23116 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 18, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 

Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 

et seq., are not applicable. 

List of Subject in 15 CFR Part 744 

Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Terrorism. 

Accordingly, part 744 of the Export 

Administration Regulations (15 CFR 

parts 730–774) is amended as follows: 

PART 744—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for 15 CFR 

part 744 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 

U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 3201 et seq.; 

42 U.S.C. 2139a; 22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22 

U.S.C. 7210; E.O. 12058, 43 FR 20947, 3 CFR, 

1978 Comp., p. 179; E.O. 12851, 58 FR 33181, 

3 CFR, 1993 Comp., p. 608; E.O. 12938, 59 

FR 59099, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 950; E.O. 

12947, 60 FR 5079, 3 CFR, 1995 Comp., p. 

356; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 

Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13099, 63 FR 45167, 3 

CFR, 1998 Comp., p. 208; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 

44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; E.O. 

13224, 66 FR 49079, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 

786; Notice of August 12, 2011, 76 FR 50661 

(August 16, 2011); Notice of September 21, 

2011, 76 FR 59001 (September, 22, 2011); 

Notice of November 9, 2011, 76 FR 70319 

(November 10, 2011); Notice of January 19, 

2012, 77 FR 3067 (January 20, 2012). 

■ 2. Supplement No. 4 to part 744 is 

amended: 

■ (a) By adding under Canada, in 

alphabetical order, two Canadian 

entities; and 

■ (b) By adding, in alphabetical order, 

the destination of Jordan under the 

Country column and one Jordanian 

entity. 

The additions read as follows: 

SUPPLEMENT NO. 4 TO PART 744—ENTITY LIST

Country Entity License requirement License review policy Federal Register 

citation 

*******

CANADA ...... Abou El-Khir Al Joundi, a.k.a., the following six 

aliases: 

For all items subject to 

the EAR. (See 

§ 744.11 of the EAR).

Presumption of denial .. 77 FR [INSERT FR 

PAGE NUMBER] 

4/18/12. 

—Abou El Kheir Joundi; 

—Abou Elkhir Al Joundi; 

—Abou Joundi Et Kheir; 

—Al Joundi; 

—Al Jundi; and 

—Elkheir Aljoundi Abou. 

2706 Carre Denise Pelletier, Montreal, Quebec, 

H4R 2T5 Canada.

*******

Canada Lab Instruments, a.k.a., the following 

alias: SCO North America.

For all items subject to 

the EAR. (See 

§ 744.11 of the EAR).

Presumption of denial .. 77 FR [INSERT FR 

PAGE NUMBER] 

4/18/12. 

5995 Gouin Ouest, #212, Montreal, Quebec, 

H4J 2P8 Canada.

*******

JORDAN ....... Masound Est. for Medical and Scientific Supplies,74 First Floor, Tla’a Al Ali Khali Al Salim 

Street, Amman, Jordon 11118.

For all items subject to 

the EAR. (See 

§ 744.11 of the EAR).

Presumption of denial .. 77 FR [INSERT FR 

PAGE NUMBER] 

4/18/12. 

*******

Dated: April 12, 2012. 

Kevin J. Wolf, 

Assistant Secretary for Export 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2012–9374 Filed 4–17–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–33–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

28 CFR Part 16 

[CPCLO Order No. 009–2012] 

Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation 

AGENCY: Department of Justice. 

ACTION: Final Rule. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Justice 

(DOJ or Department) is issuing a final 

rule for a new Department-wide Privacy 

Act system of records entitled, Debt 

Collection Enforcement System, 

JUSTICE/DOJ–016. The Department is 

exempting the Debt Collection 

Enforcement System, JUSTICE/DOJ– 

016, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j) and (k) 

from subsections (c)(3) and (4); (d)(1), 

(2), (3), and (4); (e)(1), (2), (3), (4)(G), (H) 

and (I), (5) and (8); (f) and (g) of the 

Privacy Act for the reasons set forth in 

the following text. Information in this 

system of records relates to matters of 

law enforcement efforts associated with 

debt collection purposes, and certain 

records in this system are exempt from 

certain provisions of the Privacy Act in 

order to avoid interference with such 

law enforcement functions and 

responsibilities of the DOJ. 

DATES: Effective Date: April 18, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Holley B. O’Brien, Director, Debt 

Collection Management Staff, Justice 

Management Division, Department of 

Justice, at (202) 514–5343. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice of 

the proposed rule with invitations to 

comment was published on February 

21, 2012, at 77 FR 9878. The 

Department received one comment from 

a member of the public regarding 

exemption from the access provisions of 

the Privacy Act. The Department 

accepted the comment but has declined 

to adopt the comment because the 

system of records is validly exempt from 

the access provisions of the Privacy Act 

for the reasons set forth below. In 

addition, the Department is making 

minor stylistic changes to the authority 

cited for Part 16.134 to reflect only the 

authority for the proposed rule, which 

is 5 U.S.C. 552a. Further, the 

Department is making a minor stylistic 

change to Part 16.134(a) by adding the 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 18, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 23117 

phrase ‘‘pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2)’’ 

after the phrase ‘‘[t]he following system 

of records is exempt’’ to clarify the 

statutory reason for the exemption. 

List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 16 

Administrative practices and 

procedures, Courts, Freedom of 

Information Act, Government in the 

Sunshine Act, and the Privacy Act. 

Pursuant to the authority vested in the 

Attorney General by 5 U.S.C. 552a and 

delegated to me by Attorney General 

Order 2940–2008, 28 CFR part 16 is 

amended as follows: 

PART 16—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 16 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 552, 552a, 552b(g), 

553; 18 U.S.C. 4203(a)(1); 28 U.S.C. 509, 510, 

534; 31 U.S.C. 3717, 9701. 

Subpart E—Exemption of Records 

Systems Under the Privacy Act 

■ 2. Section 16.134 is added to subpart 

E to read as follows: 

§ 16.134 Exemption of Debt Collection 

Enforcement System, Justice/DOJ–016. 

(a) The following system of records is 

exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) 

from subsections (c)(3) and (4); (d)(1), 

(2), (3), and (4); (e)(1), (2), (3), (4)(G), (H) 

and (I), (5) and (8); (f) and (g) of the 

Privacy Act. In addition, the system is 

exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2) 

from subsections (c)(3); (d)(1), (2), (3), 

and (4); (e)(1); (4)(G), (H), and (I); and 

(f). These exemptions apply only to the 

extent that information in this system is 

subject to exemption pursuant to 5 

U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) or (k)(2). Where 

compliance would not appear to 

interfere with or adversely affect the law 

enforcement purposes of this system, or 

the overall law enforcement process, the 

applicable exemption may be waived by 

the DOJ in its sole discretion. 

(b) Exemptions from the particular 

subsections are justified for the 

following reasons: 

(1) From subsection (c)(3), the 

requirement that an accounting be made 

available to the named subject of a 

record, because certain records in this 

system are exempt from the access 

provisions of subsection (d). Also, 

because making available to a record 

subject the accounting of disclosures 

from records concerning him/her would 

specifically reveal any investigative 

interest in the individual. Revealing this 

information may thus compromise 

ongoing law enforcement efforts. 

Revealing this information may also 

permit the record subject to take 

measures to impede the investigation, 

such as destroying evidence, 

intimidating potential witnesses or 

fleeing the area to avoid the 

investigation. 

(2) From subsection (c)(4) notification 

requirements because certain records in 

this system are exempt from the access 

and amendment provisions of 

subsection (d) as well as the access to 

accounting of disclosures provision of 

subsection (c)(3). 

(3) From subsections (d)(1), (2), (3), 

and (4) because access to the records 

contained in this system might 

compromise ongoing investigations, 

reveal confidential informants, or 

constitute unwarranted invasions of the 

personal privacy of third parties who 

are involved in a certain investigation. 

Amendment of the records would 

interfere with ongoing debt collection 

investigations or other law enforcement 

proceedings and impose an impossible 

administrative burden by requiring 

investigations to be continuously 

reinvestigated. 

(4) From subsection (e)(1) because it 

is not always possible to know in 

advance what information is relevant 

and necessary for law enforcement 

purposes. 

(5) From subsection (e)(2) to avoid 

impeding law enforcement efforts 

associated with debt collection by 

putting the subject of an investigation 

on notice of that fact, thereby permitting 

the subject to engage in conduct 

intended to frustrate or impede that 

investigation. 

(6) From subsection (e)(3) to avoid 

impeding law enforcement efforts in 

conjunction with debt collection by 

putting the subject of an investigation 

on notice of that fact, thereby permitting 

the subject to engage in conduct 

intended to frustrate or impede that 

investigation. 

(7) From subsection (e)(4)(G), (H) and 

(I) because portions of this system are 

exempt from the access provisions of 

subsection (d) pursuant to subsections 

(j) and (k) of the Privacy Act. 

(8) From subsection (e)(5) because 

many of the records in this system are 

records contributed by other agencies 

and the restrictions imposed by (e)(5) 

would limit the utility of the system. 

(9) From subsection (e)(8), because to 

require individual notice of disclosure 

of information due to compulsory legal 

process would pose an impossible 

administrative burden on the DOJ and 

may alert the subjects of law 

enforcement investigations, who might 

be otherwise unaware, to the fact of 

those investigations. 

(10) From subsections (f) and (g) to 

the extent that the system is exempt 

from other specific subsections of the 

Privacy Act. 

Dated: April 5, 2012. 

Nancy C. Libin, 

Chief Privacy and Civil Liberties Officer, 

United States Department of Justice. 

[FR Doc. 2012–9001 Filed 4–17–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–CN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Occupational Safety and Health 

Administration 

29 CFR Part 1926 

Rigging Equipment for Material 

Handling Construction Standard; 

Correction and Technical Amendment 

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health 

Administration (OSHA), Labor. 

ACTION: Final rule; correction and 

technical amendment. 

SUMMARY: OSHA is correcting its sling 

standard for construction titled ‘‘Rigging 

Equipment for Material Handling’’ by 

removing the rated capacity tables and 

making minor, nonsubstantive revisions 

to the regulatory text. 

DATES: The effective date for the 

corrections and technical amendment to 

the standards is April 18, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Press inquiries: Frank Meilinger, 

Director, Office of Communications, 

OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor, Room 

N–3647, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20210; telephone: (202) 

693–1999. 

General and technical information: 

Kenneth Stevanus, OSHA Office of 

Engineering Safety, OSHA, Room N– 

3621, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 

Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, 

DC 20210; telephone: (202) 693–2260. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

In OSHA’s Standards Improvement 

Project-Phase III final rule, published on 

June 8, 2011, the Agency stated that it 

was amending its standards regulating 

slings for general industry, shipyard 

employment, and construction by 

removing outdated tables that specify 

safe working loads, and revising other 

provisions that referenced the outdated 

tables (see 76 FR at 33591 and 33597). 

To replace these tables, OSHA added 

requirements that prohibit employers 

from loading slings in excess of the 

recommended safe working load 

prescribed on identification markings 

located on, or attached to, each sling; 

these requirements also prohibit the use 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES