alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- Office Home
- About Us
- Defining Racial Equity
- Remarks and Releases
- Global Anti-Racism Champions
- Key Stakeholders
- FAQs

HomeOffice of the Special Representative for Racial Equity and Justice...About Us

# 									About Us							

Now, more than ever, racism is recognized as a pressing global challenge that requires coordinated, intentional, and urgent engagement. Desirée Cormier Smith serves as the Department’s first Special Representative for Racial Equity and Justice (SRREJ). Her mandate is to advance the human rights of members of marginalized racial, ethnic, and Indigenous communities, including people of African descent, and to build global partnerships to combat systemic racism, discrimination, and xenophobia globally.

The Special Representative leads the Department’s efforts to create a world where people of all races and ethnicities are equally valued, included, and able to live up to their full potential. The position’s mandate is based upon **Executive Order 13985*****Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities*** and **Executive Order 14091*****Further Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities Through the Federal Government****.*As stated by President Biden, “Advancing equity is not a one-year project. It’s a generational commitment.”

Current strategic priorities include implementing U.S. foreign policy to (1) combat structural racism; (2) advance human rights; (3) promote democracy; (4) pursue economic equality; (5) address climate change, and/or (6) bolster peace and stability.

To learn more about the work of the Special Representative for Racial Equity and Justice, follow @US_SRREJ on Twitter. For media inquiries, please contact DRL-Press@state.gov.

Read more on Defining Racial Equity

Back to Top
#### § 548.704 Administrative collection; referral to United States Department of Justice.

In the event that the violator does not pay the penalty imposed pursuant to this part or make payment arrangements acceptable to OFAC, the matter may be referred for administrative collection measures by the Department of the Treasury or to the United States Department of Justice for appropriate action to recover the penalty in a civil suit in a federal district court.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

###### Editorial Note on Part 363

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 363 appear at 70 FR 57433, Sept. 30, 2005, 70 FR 57442, Sept. 30, 2005, and 75 FR 70815, Nov. 19, 2010.

#### § 363.57 What is the minimum amount of book-entry savings bonds that I may redeem in any one transaction?

Each redemption must be in a minimum amount of $25 redemption value, with additional one-cent increments above that amount, in any one transaction. For example, you may redeem $25.00, $25.01, $25.02, or $25.03, and so forth. Redemptions will be comprised of principal and proportionate interest.
#### § 535.503 Exclusion from licenses and authorizations.

The Secretary of the Treasury reserves the right to exclude any person from the operation of any license or from the privileges therein conferred or to restrict the applicability thereof with respect to particular persons, transactions or property or classes thereof. Such action shall be binding upon all persons receiving actual notice or constructive notice thereof.

[44 FR 66833, Nov. 21, 1979]
a
ene *YTCAN Teenen
us annua toate,
30 pc socdmee |

|
ay
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 340.8 Acceptance of bids. ( a ) *Opening of bids.* Bids will be opened at the time and place specified in the public notice.
( b ) *Method of determining accepted bids.* The lowest basis cost of money[2] computed from the date of the bonds to the date of maturity will be used in determining successful bids.
( c ) *Acceptance of successful bid.* The Secretary of the Treasury, or his representative, will notify any successful bidder of acceptance in the manner and form specified in the public notice.
Footnotes -
340.8
[2] In cases where bidders are required to specify the coupon rate, the lowest basis cost of money will be determined by reference to a specially prepared table of bond yields, a copy of which will be made available to all prospective bidders upon written request to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, or the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, Treasury Department, Washington, DC 20220. Straightline interpolation will be applied if necessary.
§ 515.210 Restrictions on lodging, paying for lodging, or making reservations at certain properties in Cuba. ( a ) Except as otherwise authorized pursuant to this part, no person subject to U.S. jurisdiction may lodge, pay for lodging, or otherwise make any reservation for or on behalf of a third party to lodge, at any property in Cuba that the Secretary of State has identified as a property that is owned or controlled by the Cuban government, a prohibited official of the Government of Cuba, as defined in § 515.337, a prohibited member of the Cuban Communist Party, as defined in § 515.338, a close relative, as defined in § 515.339, of a prohibited official of the Government of Cuba, or a close relative of a prohibited member of the Cuban Communist Party. Such properties are identified on the State Department's Cuba Prohibited Accommodations List (CPA List). This prohibition does not apply to certain transactions set forth in paragraph (b) of this section. Note 1 to paragraph ( a
):
The names, addresses, or other identifying details, as relevant, of properties that the Secretary of State has identified as meeting the criteria set forth in this section are incorporated in the CPA List as published in the Federal Register. The CPA List is also accessible through the following page on the State Department's website: *www.state.gov/cuba-sanctions/cuba-prohibited-accommodations .*
( b ) The prohibition in paragraph (a) of this section does not apply to lodging-related transactions initiated prior to the date that the property was added to the CPA List as published in the Federal Register.
[85 FR 60070, Sept. 24, 2020]
#### § 536.314 Transfer.

The term *transfer* means any actual or purported act or transaction, whether or not evidenced by writing, and whether or not done or performed within the United States, the purpose, intent, or effect of which is to create, surrender, release, convey, transfer, or alter, directly or indirectly, any right, remedy, power, privilege, or interest with respect to any property and, without limitation upon the foregoing, shall include the making, execution, or delivery of any assignment, power, conveyance, check, declaration, deed, deed of trust, power of attorney, power of appointment, bill of sale, mortgage, receipt, agreement, contract, certificate, gift, sale, affidavit, or statement; the making of any payment; the setting off of any obligation or credit; the appointment of any agent, trustee, or fiduciary; the creation or transfer of any lien; the issuance, docketing, filing, or levy of or under any judgment, decree, attachment, injunction, execution, or other judicial or administrative process or order, or the service of any garnishment; the acquisition of any interest of any nature whatsoever by reason of a judgment or decree of any foreign country; the fulfillment of any condition; the exercise of any power of appointment, power of attorney, or other power; or the acquisition, disposition, transportation, importation, exportation, or withdrawal of any security.
40255.

#### DAVIS v. HOLT.

Decided September 4, 1963.

*281*Wade H. Leonard,*for plaintiff in error.

*Hurt, Baird & Freeman, Joe C. Freeman,*contra.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

The defendant’s plea in abatement is based solely on the ground that the plaintiff had failed to pay the court costs, which accrued in the first action, before filing the second action.

In support of his contention the defendant cites *Poplarville Sawmill Co. v. Driver & Co.,*17 Ga. App. 674 (88 SE 36), a case where the plaintiff had voluntarily dismissed the first action before filing the second. As pointed out in *Dowe v. Debus Mfg. Co.,*52 Ga. App. 713 (1) (184 SE 362): “It is only where an action has been nonsuited, dismissed, or discontinued, and the dismissal or discontinuance is by the act of the plaintiff, that, as a condition precedent to recommencing the suit, the costs of the former suit must be paid, or an affidavit in forma pauperis in lieu thereof be made as provided in the Code of 1933, §§ 3-508, 3-509.” In that case the first action was dismissed after a traverse to the service had been sustained and it was held that the second action was not subject to the plea in abatement on the ground that the costs had not been paid and no pauper’s *282affidavit filed. Such case followed the decision of the Supreme Court in *Rumph v. Truelove,*66 Ga. 480, where it was held: “To fall under that section *[Code*§ 3-508] there must have been a nonsuit by the court, or a dismission, or discontinuance by the plaintiff himself.” See also *Rountree v. Key,*71 Ga. 214, which explains that cases like the one sub judice may be renewed under *Code*§ 3-808 which section does not require the payment of costs as a prerequisite, and not under *Code*§ 3-508.

In the present case the former action was, as shown by the plea, ended by the court sustaining the defendant’s plea to the jurisdiction. The trial court erred in overruling the plaintiff’s general demurrer to the defendant’s plea in abatement and the further proceedings were nugatory, and the assignments of error thereon need not be passed upon by this court.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Frankuvi and Jordan, JJ., concur.*
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2583 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2583

 To amend the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and 
    Liability Act of 1980 to prevent the construction of a thermal 
   destruction facility at the OII site east of downtown Los Angeles 
           unless the local community agrees to the location.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 2, 1995

 Mr. Martinez introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and 
    Liability Act of 1980 to prevent the construction of a thermal 
   destruction facility at the OII site east of downtown Los Angeles 
           unless the local community agrees to the location.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. USE OF FUNDS FROM SUPERFUND PROHIBITED FOR THERMAL 
              DESTRUCTION FACILITY AT OII SITE.

    Section 111 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 is amended by adding the 
following at the end thereof:
    ``(q) Use of Funds for Thermal Destruction Facilty at OII Site 
Prohibited.--No funds available in the Hazardous Substances Superfund 
may be used for the construction or operation of a thermal destruction 
facility at the site known as the OII landfill site, located 
approximately 10 miles east of downtown Los Angeles and covering 190 
acres, divided by California Highway 60 (Pomona Freeway) and adjacent 
to the City of Montebello on the South, and the City of Monterey Park 
on the North. The preceding sentence shall not apply if the City of 
Monterey Park and the Administrator enter into a written agreement 
regarding the location of the facility.''.
                                 <all>
```
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases…Bhutan National Day

# 											Bhutan National Day									

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

December 16, 2023

On behalf of the United States of America, I extend my sincere congratulations to the people of Bhutan on the celebration of the National Day of the Kingdom of Bhutan on December 17.

The peoples of our two countries share a history of warm friendship and a commitment to building a world that is more peaceful, prosperous, and equitable. The United States looks forward to continuing to strengthen the ties between our peoples and to working together to address shared challenges, such as climate change.

On behalf of the people and the Government of the United States of America, I warmly extend best wishes to the people of Bhutan as they celebrate this special occasion.

Tags

BhutanBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 361.6 Advice of shipment. ( a ) If the value of any one shipment to one consignee at one time by one consignor, except in the case of any intracity shipment or the shipment of registered securities by certified mail, or by another means providing the same protection as certified mail, equals or exceeds $10,000, immediate notice thereof shall be forwarded by the consignor to the consignee by separate mail. Such notice shall include: ( 1 ) A complete record of the contents of the shipment;
( 2 ) The method of transportation employed and the name of the carrier; and
( 3 ) The date of delivery to such carrier.
( b ) The consignee shall arrange that: ( 1 ) Shipment when received, be opened and inspected by one or more responsible employees;
( 2 ) Immediate advice of any difference between the amounts or quantity indicated in the notice by the consignor to the consignee and in the shipment when opened be forwarded to the consignor;
( 3 ) The consignor and the post office, or office of other carrier through which delivery would be made, be notified immediately in the event of the failure of the shipment to arrive in due course;
( 4 ) The consignor be advised immediately concerning any damage to the shipment; and
( 5 ) All findings of the consignee in such cases be made a matter of record subject to the inspection of the Secretary or other Government officer, in connection with any necessary investigation.
[41 FR 19302, May 12, 1976. Redesignated at 49 FR 47002, Nov. 30, 1984. Further redesignated at 50 FR 51394, Dec. 17, 1985, as amended at 51 FR 19751, June 2, 1986]
§ 549.206 Exempt transactions. ( a ) *Personal communications.* The prohibitions contained in this part do not apply to any postal, telegraphic, telephonic, or other personal communication that does not involve the transfer of anything of value.
( b ) *Information or informational materials.* ( 1 ) The importation from any country and the exportation to any country of any information or informational materials, as defined in § 549.304, whether commercial or otherwise, regardless of format or medium of transmission, are exempt from the prohibitions of this part.
( 2 ) This section does not exempt from regulation or authorize transactions related to information or informational materials not fully created and in existence at the date of the transactions, or to the substantive or artistic alteration or enhancement of informational materials, or to the provision of marketing and business consulting services. Such prohibited transactions include, but are not limited to, payment of advances for information or informational materials not yet created and completed (with the exception of prepaid subscriptions for widely circulated magazines and other periodical publications); provision of services to market, produce or co-produce, create, or assist in the creation of information or informational materials; and, with respect to information or informational materials imported from persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 549.201(a), payment of royalties with respect to income received for enhancements or alterations made by U.S. persons to such information or informational materials.
( 3 ) This section does not exempt or authorize transactions incident to the exportation of software subject to the Export Administration Regulations, 15 CFR parts 730 through 774, or to the exportation of goods, technology, or software for use in the transmission of any data, or to the provision, sale, or leasing of capacity on telecommunications transmission facilities (such as satellite or terrestrial network connectivity) for use in the transmission of any data. The exportation of such items or services and the provision, sale, or leasing of such capacity or facilities to a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 549.201(a) are prohibited.
( c ) *Travel.* The prohibitions contained in this part do not apply to any transactions ordinarily incident to travel to or from any country, including importation of accompanied baggage for personal use, maintenance within any country including payment of living expenses and acquisition of goods or services for personal use, and arrangement or facilitation of such travel including nonscheduled air, sea, or land voyages.
Need to return call by / at/between and

. Signature: Project No.: 0172.08.005.60 3 Page 1 of 1

Project Name: DMR2009 

### CBI?

Yes

No TELEPHONE CALL RECOR D

Incoming

Outgoing Date: 02/24/11 Time: 1 1:49 am

pm

Company Name: SC Dept Corr Wateree River ERG Staff Name: Kimberly Landick

Contact Name: Dale Stoudemire Contact Phone Number: ( 803)

- 898

- 4209

General Subject: 2009 DMR Mercury Discharges



### TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

On February 24, 2011 at 11:49am I called the DHEC Bureau of Water at the South Carolina Department of

Health and Environmental Control at 803

- 898

- 4300 and left a message for Tiffany Croy.

On March 1, 2011 at 3:06pm I called the DHEC Bureau of Water again and spoke w ith Dale Stoudemire (803

-

898

- 4209). He told me that he enters the data into the computer but does not analyze it. He confirmed the values

below.

Mercury Concentration: 20091130 2.85 mg/L (avg) 2.9 mg/L (max)

Flow: 20091130 0.168 MGD (avg) 0.171 MGD (max)

He also stated that their permit limit is 19 mg/L. We have these same values. He said that he would check the

paper reports to see if there was a mistake and get back to me. Mr. Stoudemire left a message at 3:29pm stating

that the concentrations shou ld be 2.85 x 10

- 6 (avg) and 2.9x10

- 6 (max) and that their permit limit is 19

micrograms per liter. Recommend changing the milligrams per liter to micrograms per liter for mercury

concentration. I called him back at 3:35pm and thanked him for the informatio n.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7763

PINMON LARRY TYLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION; R. JORDAN, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-687-5-BR) Submitted: February 25, 1999 Decided: May 20, 1999 Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Pinmon Larry Tyler, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Pinmon Larry Tyler appeals the district court’s order dismissing Tyler’s 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Tyler v. North Carolina Dep’t of Corrections , No. CA-98-687-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Nov. 16, 1998). We also deny Tyler’s motion to amend. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 542.210 Prohibited facilitation.

Except as otherwise authorized, United States persons, wherever located, are prohibited from approving, financing, facilitating, or guaranteeing a transaction by a foreign person where the transaction by that foreign person would be prohibited by §§ 542.206, 542.207, 542.208, or 542.209 of this part if performed by a United States person or within the United States.
TRAVEL DESK yj^rcn'..^m 

6921 Hampton A venue P 

Saint Louis. MO 63109 

314-352-0068 

800-288-2037 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C. 

20590 

Subject: Haneda Combination Services Allocation Proceeding DOT-OST-2010-0018 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

As a dedicated travel partner of American Airlines, I am writing in support of American's 

application to provide new service from New York's John F. Kennedy International 

Airport and Los Angeles International Airport to Tokyo international Airport at Haneda. 

I recognize and applaud you and the Obama administration for your success last 

December in reaching a landmark Open Skies agreement with Japan, which opens up 

Haneda to service by U.S. airlines. 

I encourage your selection of American Airlines to provide nonstop service from New 

York and Los Angeles to Haneda in order to provide an essential connection between 

three of the world's largest financial and commerce centers. 

Recent events, including the successful preservation of Japan Airlines' oneworld Alliance 

membership, have underscored American's strong commitment to the trans-Pacific 

market. American is likewise committed to New York and Los Angeles - both vital focal 

points of business, trade, entertainment, technology and education - providing 

unsurpassed air service since the mid-1900s 

Both the New York and Los Angeles metro areas will gain significant economic benefits 

from these proposed new flights, as will American's customers and employees. 

However, we need your help to make the JFK & LAX/Haneda connection a reality. 

Therefore, I strongly urge you to say yes to American Airlines and its request for slots to 

fly from.Kennedy and Los Angeles to Haneda! 

Sincerely, '^ ^j^ ^ Q^j ^ '
**Exhibit
      32.1**





Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
      Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the


Sarbanes
      - Oxley Act of 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of PLM Equipment Growth Fund V (the
“Partnership”), on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended September 30, 2005 as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), the undersigned, the President of the General Partner and of the
      Partnership, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:





(1)  the
      Report of the Partnership filed today fully complies with the requirements
      of
      Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.














/s/
      Paul M. Leand


Paul
      M.
      Leand


President
      of PLM Financial Services, Inc


June
      6,
      2006