alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Assistant Secretary for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Kritenbrink’s Travel to Singapore, Cambodia, Thailand, Vietnam, and Brunei

# 									Assistant Secretary for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Kritenbrink’s Travel to Singapore, Cambodia, Thailand, Vietnam, and Brunei							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

February 23, 2024

Assistant Secretary for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Daniel J. Kritenbrink will travel to Singapore; Phnom Penh, Cambodia; Bangkok, Thailand; Hanoi, Vietnam; and Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei, February 23-March 4 to underscore the United States’ strong and enduring commitment to its allies and partners in Southeast Asia.

In Singapore, Assistant Secretary Kritenbrink will co-lead the U.S.-Singapore Strategic Partnership Dialogue alongside Ministry of Foreign Affairs Permanent Secretary Albert Chua.  They will discuss the wide-ranging U.S.-Singapore partnership, including defense and security ties, economic cooperation, critical and emerging technology, and climate and energy.

In Phnom Penh, Assistant Secretary Kritenbrink will meet with Cambodian officials to advance our shared vision of a free, prosperous, secure, and resilient Indo-Pacific.  The Assistant Secretary will also underscore U.S. commitment to the Cambodian people and their aspirations for a democratic and independent country where all voices are heard and respected, and Cambodia’s sovereignty is protected.

In Bangkok, Assistant Secretary Kritenbrink will co-lead the 9th U.S.-Thailand Strategic Dialogue alongside Thai Ministry of Foreign Affairs Permanent Secretary Eksiri Pintaruchi.  He will also co-lead the Second Strategic and Defense Dialogue alongside Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Indo-Pacific Security Affairs Jedidiah Royal.  During these two dialogues, under the auspices of the U.S.-Thai Communiqué on Strategic Alliance and Partnership, the Assistant Secretary will work to advance bilateral cooperation in areas of shared interest including economic growth, climate change, global health, security cooperation, and people-to-people ties.

In Hanoi, Assistant Secretary Kritenbrink will meet with Vietnamese officials and participate in the Asia-Pacific Dialogue.  Building on the recent upgrade of U.S.-Vietnam ties to a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership, the Assistant Secretary will seek to further deepen U.S.-Vietnam relations and advance our shared vision of a prosperous, open, resilient, and peaceful Indo-Pacific Region.

In Bandar Seri Begawan, Assistant Secretary Kritenbrink will commemorate the 40th anniversary of U.S.-Brunei relations.  He will also meet with senior Bruneian officials to discuss key issues in the bilateral relationship, including economic and security initiatives, efforts to tackle climate change, and regional cooperation.

Tags

BruneiBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsCambodiaIndo-PacificOffice of the SpokespersonSingaporeSovereigntyStrategic DialogueThailandTravelVietnam

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of Park Sound Acquisition Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2017 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James Cassidy
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 Chief Financial Officer
Date: April 9, 2018
Home2016 Treaties and Agreements...Barbados (16-1125) – Agreement on Aerial Interception Assistance

# 									Barbados (16-1125) – Agreement on Aerial Interception Assistance							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

November 25, 2016

Law Enforcement:  Aerial Interception Assistance

Agreement effected by exchange of notes at Bridgetown October 7, 2011 and November 25, 2016; entered into force November 25, 2016.  With related note.

 
Download attachment						 [716 KB]

Tags

BarbadosLaw EnforcementTreaties

Back to Top
BATHYMETRIC MAP

Abhyhed ot Weshngres. DC
PARTMENT OF COMMERCE

us
HATIOMAL OCEANIC AND ATHOSTHEDC ADWNOTEATION
NATIONAL CCLAM SURVEY

ws

BANYYMETRE CONSOUE INTERVAL 50 METER fe MMADMNIAA DEPD
oPPtiatatS WY HE On TE eit

Hascieteit MERCATOR PRONTO
Sexe 1-25.90

BLAKE PLATEAU
HARRINGTON HILL

HARRINGTON HiLL
NOS NH 18-1
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2561

To provide for an exchange of lands located near Gustavus, Alaska.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 31, 1995

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

A BILL

To provide for an exchange of lands located near Gustavus,

Alaska.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Glacier Bay National

5 Park and Preserve Boundary Adjustment Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. LAND EXCHANGE.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—If the State of Alaska transfers

8 all right, title, and interest in and to the State lands de9 scribed in subsection (b)(1) to the Secretary of the Inte10 rior, the Secretary shall transfer to the State of Alaska
2

•HR 2561 IH

1 all right, title, and interest of the United States in and

2 to the Federal lands described in subsection (b)(2).

3 (b) LANDS DESCRIBED.—

4 (1) STATE LANDS.—The lands referred to in

5 subsection (a) to be transferred by the State of Alas6 ka comprise approximately 960 acres within the

7 Dude Creek Critical Habitat Area more particularly

8 described as follows:

9 Township 40 South, Range 58 East,

10 C.R.M.

11 Section 16 in its entirety.

Section 9, W1 12 ⁄2.

13 (2) FEDERAL LANDS.—The lands referred to in

14 subsection (a) to be transferred by the Secretary

15 comprise approximately 960 acres more particularly

16 described as follows:

17 In Township 39 South, Range 59 East,

18 Copper River Meridian (C.R.M.) partially sur19 veyed—

Section 36 (unsurveyed, SE1⁄4SW1 20 ⁄4,

S1⁄2SW1⁄4SW1⁄4, NE1⁄4SW1⁄4, W1⁄2W1 21 ⁄2,

NW1⁄4SE1⁄4, and S1⁄2SE1⁄4NW1 22 ⁄4, contain23 ing approximately 130 acres.

24 In Township 40 South, Range 59 East,

25 partially surveyed—
3

•HR 2561 IH

Section 1 (unsurveyed) NW1⁄4, SW1 1 ⁄4,

W1⁄2SE1⁄4, and SW1⁄4SW1⁄4NE1 2 ⁄4, exclud3 ing U.S. Survey 944 and Native Allotment

4 A–442;

5 Section 2 (unsurveyed), fractional,

6 that portion lying above the mean high tide

7 line of Icy Passage, excluding U.S. Survey

8 944 and U.S. Survey 945;

9 Section 11 (unsurveyed), fractional,

10 that portion lying above the mean high tide

11 line of Icy Passage, excluding U.S. Survey

12 944;

13 Section 12 (unsurveyed), fractional,

NW1⁄4NE1⁄4, W1⁄2NW1⁄4SW1⁄4NE1 14 ⁄4, those

portions of NW1⁄4 and SW1 15 ⁄4 lying above

16 the mean high tide line of Icy Passage, ex17 cluding U.S. Survey 944 and Native Allot18 ment A–442,

19 containing approximately 830 acres,

20 aggregating approximately 960 acres.

21 (c) GLACIER BAY NATIONAL PARK AND PRE22 SERVE.—The lands acquired from the State of Alaska

23 under this section shall be added to and administered as

24 part of the Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve, sub25 ject to valid existing rights. Upon completion of the ex-
4

•HR 2561 IH

1 change of lands under this section, the Secretary shall ad2 just the boundary of Glacier Bay National Park and Pre3 serve to include the lands acquired from the State of Alas4 ka and to exclude the lands transferred to the State of

5 Alaska under this section.

Æ
#### § 539.601 Records and reports.

For provisions relating to required records and reports, see part 501, subpart C, of this chapter. Recordkeeping and reporting requirements imposed by part 501 of this chapter with respect to the prohibitions contained in this part are considered requirements arising pursuant to this part.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 8, 2011

d0228 

# Order

March 8, 2011

139582(73)

PATRICIA PAQUETTE, Guardian and Conservator of RICHARD PAQUETTE, a Legally Incapacitated Person, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139582 COA: 279909 Macomb CC: 2 004-002787-NO STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant,

and

ARVILLA WOODS, SHANNE SMITH, and MARISSA GIBBONS, Defendants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for r econsideration of this Court’s October 26, 2010 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Assistance for Afghanistan to Respond to June 22 Earthquake

# 									Assistance for Afghanistan to Respond to June 22 Earthquake							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

June 28, 2022

The devastating June 22 earthquake that struck in eastern Afghanistan intensified the ongoing humanitarian crisis the Afghan people have endured for too long. U.S.-funded partners on the ground responded rapidly with medical care, and President Biden directed an assessment of additional needs in the wake of the natural disaster. In response, the United States will provide nearly $55 million in additional immediate humanitarian assistance through the U.S. Agency for International Development to urgently reach those most affected by the natural disaster. This new funding brings total U.S. humanitarian assistance to over $774 million in the last year.

This additional disaster relief assistance will reach people affected by the earthquake with critical relief items: shelter materials; pots for cooking; jerry cans to collect and store water; blankets; solar lamps; clothes, and other household items. Assistance will be provided for water, sanitation, and hygiene supplies to prevent waterborne disease outbreak in the aftermath of this natural disaster. The funding will also support other high need areas throughout the country.

The United States has an enduring commitment to the people of Afghanistan, and we welcome and encourage support from our international partners in this time of great need.

Tags

AfghanistanBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsHumanitarian AidNatural DisastersOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of StateU.S. Agency for International Development

Back to Top
United States Department of the Interior 

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 

·wash_i�_:gton, DC 20240 

Dr. Susan Hedman 

EPA Region 5 Administrator 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

77 West Jackson Boulevard 

Chicago, IL 60604-3507 

Dear Dr. Hedman; 

AUG 1 1 Z015 

On October 21, 2009, the then Assistant Secretary fot fish and Wildlife and Parks, Mr. Thomas 

Strickland, wrote Mr. Bharat Mathur, the Acting Region 5 Administrator at the time, to inform 

you that the Department of the Interior (DOl) had identified visibility impairment at Voyageurs 

and Isle Royale National Parks likely attributable to Xcel Energy's coal-fired Sherburne County 

Generating Station (Sherco) [Enclosed]. 

Since that time, a nun1ber of events have led or will lead to significant improvements in visibility 

at these Parks. Most recently, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has reached a 

settlement agreement with the National Parks Conservation Association, Friends of the Bonndary 

Waters, Voyageurs National Park Association, Fresh Energy, the Siena Club, and the Northern 

States Power Company Mim1esota, d/b/a Xcel Energy, concerning the operation of and emission 

levels at Sherco. The settlement agreement, which became effective on July 24, 2015 after 

notice to tl1e United States District Comt for the District of Minnesota, continues a trend of 

reducing sulfur dioxide emissions at Sherco. 

Although the settlement reaches a different result than the recommendation made in our October 

21, 2009 letter, once implemented, the settlement achieves an outcome that addresses our 

visibility concerns at Voyageurs and Isle Royale National Parks. We view the settlement as a 

reasonable compromise of emissions controls and economic flexibility. 

As EPA proceeds with amending the Minnesota Federal Implementation Plan pursuant to the 

settlement, DOl is available to work with your agency wherever we may be of help. We have 

staff dedicated to air quality modeling in Class I areas managed by DOl bureaus that may be of 

assistance to EPA in providing data and analysis for visibility metrics now and in future 

rulemakings. 
We are happy to answers questions or discuss future coordination at your convenience. Please 

contact Carol McCoy, National Park Service, at (303) 969-2096 with inquiries. 

cc: 

Sincerely, 

Michael J. Bean 

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary 

for Fish and Wildlife and Parks 

Jonathan B. Jarvis, Director, National Park Service 

1849 C. St. NW,Washington, DC, 20240 

David A Carson, Department of Justice 

Environment and Natural Resomces D ivision, South Terrace 

Suite 370, 999 18th Street Denver, CO 80202 

Matthew Marks, EPA, Office of General Counsel 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20460 

Enclosure
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 205.7 Can a Treasury-State agreement be amended? ( a ) We or a State may amend a Treasury-State agreement at any time if both we and the State agree in writing.
( b ) The effective date of an amendment shall be the date both parties agree to the amendment in writing unless otherwise agreed to by both parties.
( c ) We and a State must amend a Treasury-State agreement as needed to change or clarify its language when the terms of the existing agreement are either no longer correct or no longer applicable. A State must notify us in writing within 30 days of the time the State becomes aware of a change, describing the Federal assistance program change. The notification must include a proposed amendment for our review and a current list of all programs included in the Treasury-State agreement. Amendments may address, but are not limited to: ( 1 ) Additions or deletions of Federal assistance programs subject to this subpart A;
( 2 ) Changes in funding techniques; and
( 3 ) Changes in clearance patterns.
( d ) Additions or deletions to the list of Federal assistance programs subject to this subpart A take effect when a Treasury-State agreement is amended, unless otherwise agreed to by the parties.
( e ) Federal assistance programs that are to be added to a Treasury-State agreement are not subject to this subpart A until the Treasury-State agreement is amended, except when a Federal assistance program subject to this subpart A is being replaced by a Federal assistance program governed by subpart B of this part, in which case the replacement program is immediately subject to this subpart A.
( f ) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, if no changes to the Treasury-State agreement are required, States must notify us annually.
§ 547.407 Payments from blocked accounts to satisfy obligations prohibited. Pursuant to § 547.201, no debits may be made to a blocked account to pay obligations to U.S. persons or other persons, except as authorized by or pursuant to this part. Note 1 to § 547.407 :
*See also* § 547.502(e), which provides that no license or other authorization contained in or issued pursuant to this part authorizes transfers of or payments from blocked property or debits to blocked accounts unless the license or other authorization explicitly authorizes the transfer of or payment from blocked property or the debit to a blocked account.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Assistant Secretary Noyes Travels to Kenya

# 									Assistant Secretary Noyes Travels to Kenya							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

July 16, 2023

Assistant Secretary of State for the Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration Julieta Valls Noyes will visit Kenya on official travel from July 17 – 21.  Assistant Secretary Noyes will meet with government officials to highlight our commitment to U.S.-Kenya partnership on finding inclusive ways to protect and assist refugees.  She will also advance innovative partnerships in the refugee response in Kenya and on climate change and migration.

During her trip, Assistant Secretary Noyes will meet with government officials, international organization and NGO partners, and observe the on-the-ground impact of their work with refugee populations, conflict victims, and vulnerable migrants.  Noyes will interact with refugees in urban and rural settings and visit the U.S. Resettlement Support Center.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsBureau of Population, Refugees, and MigrationConflictsKenyaMigrationOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial International TravelRefugees

Back to Top
§ 5.5 How will Treasury entities add interest, penalty charges, and administrative costs to a Treasury debt? ( a ) *Assessment and notice.* Treasury entities shall assess interest, penalties and administrative costs on Treasury debts in accordance with the provisions of 31 U.S.C. 3717 and 31 CFR 901.9, on Treasury debts. Interest shall be charged in accordance with the requirements of 31 U.S.C. 3717(a). Penalties shall accrue at the rate of 6% per year, or such other higher rate as authorized by law. Administrative costs, that is the costs of processing and handling a delinquent debt, shall be determined by the Treasury entity collecting the Treasury debt. Treasury entities may have additional policies regarding how interest, penalties, and administrative costs are assessed on particular types of debts. Treasury entities are required to explain in the notice to the debtor described in § 5.4 of this part how interest, penalties, costs, and other charges are assessed, unless the requirements are included in a contract or repayment agreement.
( b ) *Waiver of interest, penalties, and administrative costs.* Unless otherwise required by law, Treasury entities may not charge interest if the amount due on the debt is paid within 30 days after the date from which the interest accrues. *See* 31 U.S.C. 3717(d). Treasury entities may waive interest, penalties, and administrative costs, or any portion thereof, when it would be against equity and good conscience or not in the Treasury entity's best interest to collect such charges, in accordance with Treasury guidelines for waiving claims against Treasury employees for erroneous overpayments. *See* Treasury Directive 34-01 (Waiving Claims Against Treasury Employees for Erroneous Payments) set forth at appendix A of this part and at *http://www.treas.gov/regs .* Legal counsel approval is not required to waive such charges. Cf., §§ 5.7 and 5.8 of this part, which require legal counsel approval when compromising a debt or terminating debt collection activity on a debt.
( c ) *Accrual during suspension of debt collection.* In most cases, interest, penalties and administrative costs will continue to accrue during any period when collection has been suspended for any reason (for example, when the debtor has requested a hearing). Treasury entities may suspend accrual of any or all of these charges when accrual would be against equity and good conscience or not in the Treasury entity's best interest, in accordance with Treasury guidelines for waiving claims against Treasury employees for erroneous overpayments. *See* Treasury Directive 34-01 (Waiving Claims Against Treasury Employees for Erroneous Payments), set forth at appendix A of this part and *http://www.treas.gov/regs .*
39469.

#### TAYLOR v. THE STATE.

Jordan, Judge.

Grady Taylor, under an indictment charging him with the offense of burglary, was tried and convicted in the Superior Court of Walker County. His amended motion for new trial on the general and two special grounds was denied and he excepted to that judgment. *Held:*

1. There being no evidence of a confession of the defendant adduced on the trial of this case, it was reversible error for the trial court to charge on the law of confessions. *Pressley v. State,*201 Ga. 267 (39 SE2d 478), and cases therein cited. The trial court therefore erred in denying special ground 1 of the amended motion, which assigned error on the court’s charge relating to the law of confessions as being unwarranted by the evidence. The contention of the State that this charge was authorized by the evidence relating to a declaration made by the defendant to' the arresting officer is without merit since said declaration amounted to nothing more than an incriminating admission which did not admit every material element of the crime charged against the defendant and was not therefore a confession. *Blount v. State,*213 Ga. 552 (100 SE2d 172); and *Lee v. State,*81 Ga. App. 63 (1) (57 SE2d 710). Where the accused makes only an incriminating admission, not amounting to a confession, it is error for the court to charge on the law of confessions. *Pressley v. State,*201 Ga. 267, supra.

*843Decided April 27, 1962.

*Cook & Palmour, Bobby Lee Cook, A. Cecil Palvwar,*for plaintiff in error.

*Earl B. Self, Solicitor-General,*contra.

2. The remaining special ground contended that the trial court erred in refusing to allow the defendant upon request to' be sworn and testify under oath. It is unnecessary to pass on this ground for the reason that under the act of 1962 (Ga, L. 1962, p. 133), amending *Code*§ 38-415, the defendant on the retrial of this case may elect to be sworn and testify in his own behalf.

3. The general grounds are not ruled upon since the case is to be tried again.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Frankum, J., concur.*
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

###### Editorial Note on Part 363

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 363 appear at 70 FR 57433, Sept. 30, 2005, 70 FR 57442, Sept. 30, 2005, and 75 FR 70815, Nov. 19, 2010.

#### §§ 363.211-363.249 [Reserved]