alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

Editorial Note on Part 363
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 363 appear at 70 FR 57433, Sept. 30, 2005, 70 FR 57442, Sept. 30, 2005, and 75 FR 70815, Nov. 19, 2010.

§ 363.160 What subparts govern the conversion of definitive savings bonds? ( a ) This subpart governs: ( 1 ) The process of converting definitive savings bonds of all eligible series and types of registration to book-entry bonds in TreasuryDirect ®;
( 2 ) Converted savings bonds of all series registered in the coowner form of registration, unless the non-converting coowner consents to a change in the registration of the bonds after conversion;
( 3 ) Converted savings bonds of Series E registered in the owner with beneficiary form of registration, unless the beneficiary consents to a change in the registration of the bonds after conversion; and
( 4 ) Converted savings bonds of all series that are held as gift bonds by the person who converted the bonds.
( b ) Subpart C governs: ( 1 ) Converted savings bonds of any series registered in the single owner or entity form of registration;
( 2 ) Converted Series EE and Series I savings bonds registered in the owner with beneficiary form of registration;
( 3 ) Converted Series E savings bonds registered in the owner with beneficiary form of registration, where the beneficiary has consented to a change in the registration of the bonds after conversion; and
( 4 ) Converted savings bonds of all series registered in the coowner form of registration, where the non-converting coowner has consented to a change in the registration of the bonds after conversion.
[70 FR 14943, Mar. 23, 2005, as amended at 70 FR 57347, Sept. 30, 2005; 74 FR 19420, Apr. 29, 2009]
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Art in Embassies Announces Clarice Smith Collection

# 									Art in Embassies Announces Clarice Smith Collection							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

October 19, 2023

As the United States approaches its 250th year, the State Department’s Art in Embassies program is working with cultural institutions, artists, families, and galleries to curate art collections that promote U.S. diplomacy.

The first collection, The Clarice Smith Collection, comprises 72 artworks by Washington, D.C.-based artist Clarice Smith. These pieces encompass portraits, landscapes, and still-lifes rendered in oil, pastel, and watercolor. They will immediately become available for exhibit in U.S. embassies and Ambassadors’ residences under long-term loan agreements.

Clarice Smith, a passionate advocate for U.S. diplomacy, supported cultural diplomacy through Art in Embassies’ partner, the Foundation for Art and Preservation in Embassies (FAPE). Additionally, she collaborated with her son, David Bruce Smith, on a series of engaging biographies introducing young students to leading figures who played pivotal roles in shaping our democracy.

Art in Embassies Director Megan Beyer and Chief Curator Camille Benton announced the Collection during Art in Embassies’ 60th anniversary dinner with ambassadors and cultural leaders at the Smithsonian’s National Museum of American History.

The Clarice Smith Collection is made possible by David Bruce Smith’s Grateful American Foundation.

The Office of Art in Embassies, established in 1963, plays a crucial role in U.S. public diplomacy, connecting nations through curated exhibitions. It showcases the innovation and cultural prowess of the United States and fosters cross-cultural connections.

For more information about Art in Embassies, visit art.state.gov. Press inquiries can be sent to Megan Beyer at BeyerMC@state.gov.

Tags

Bureau of Educational and Cultural AffairsCultural ObjectsCultural PropertiesDiplomacyOffice of the SpokespersonPublic Diplomacy

Back to Top
# CI2020444EN.01000401.xml

| 22.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 444/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 444/4

---

Joint declaration by the European Parliament, Council and Commission on the treatment of NGEU interest costs and repayments in the 2021-2027 MFF

(2020/C 444 I/04)

The three Institutions agree that expenditures covering the financing costs of Next Generation EU shall aim at not reducing EU programmes and funds.

The three Institutions agree that the treatment of NGEU interest costs and repayments in the 2021-2027 MFF, currently forecast at EUR 12,9 billion for the seven years, is without prejudice to how this matter will be addressed in future MFFs from 2028 onwards.

The three Institutions agree to work towards introducing sufficient new own resources with a view to covering an amount corresponding to the expected expenditure related to repayment and interest costs.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-50234

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

GUADALUPE RAUL MARTINEZ, also known as Raul Martinez-Guadalupe,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:14-CR-1394-1

Before JONES, SOUTHWICK, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Guadalupe Raul 

Martinez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Martinez has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 15, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-50234 Document: 00513308783 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/15/2015
No. 15-50234

2

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-50234 Document: 00513308783 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/15/2015
HomeBiographies...Samuel Werberg

# 				Samuel Werberg			

															Dubai Hub Director and Arabic Language Spokesperson						Office of International Media Engagement												

				August 16, 2020 -									Present							

Tags

Office of International Media EngagementState Department Official

Back to Top
§ 525.301 Blocked account; blocked property. The terms *blocked account* and *blocked property* mean any account or property subject to the prohibitions in § 525.201 held in the name of a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 525.201, or in which such person has an interest, and with respect to which payments, transfers, exportations, withdrawals, or other dealings may not be made or effected except pursuant to a license or other authorization from OFAC expressly authorizing such action. Note 1 to § 525.301 .
*See* § 525.406 concerning the blocked status of property and interests in property of an entity that is directly or indirectly owned, whether individually or in the aggregate, 50 percent or more by one or more persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 525.201.
#### § 549.406 Offshore transactions.

The prohibitions in § 549.201 on transactions or dealings involving blocked property apply to transactions by any U.S. person in a location outside the United States with respect to property held in the name of a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 549.201(a), or property in which a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 549.201(a) has or has had an interest since the effective date.
10K.Exhibit 10(b) 06.30.2012.Q4






Exhibit 10(b)
	
					
	DISCRETIONARY COMPENSATION




Because special situations occur where individual achievement may not be adequately recognized under a single incentive plan, the Compensation and Governance Committee (the "Committee"), at the beginning of each fiscal year, grants authority to the Chairman of the Board ("Chairman") and/or the President/Chief Executive Officer to distribute additional discretionary cash and/or stock compensation up to an aggregate maximum amount to eligible participants for each particular fiscal year. For fiscal year 2013, the aggregate amount of cash compensation approved by the Committee was $500,000, and the maximum number of shares approved by the Committee was 600,000 shares of Class A or Class B Common Stock. The stock compensation may be in the form of performance share award opportunities and/or outright grants of shares of Common Stock, all to be awarded under the Company's 2003 Stock Option and Incentive Plan.  Discretionary compensation is awarded based upon individual effort and is paid in amounts and at such times as the Chairman and/or President/Chief Executive Officer determine, in their sole discretion. No employee has a guaranteed right to discretionary compensation in the event that performance targets are not met.
Eligible participants include any employee of the Company, excluding the Chairman and President/Chief Executive Officer for cash or stock compensation, and excluding executive officers of the Company for stock compensation, except where approved by the Committee.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

###### Editorial Note on Part 360

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 360 appear at 79 FR 8860, Feb. 14, 2014.

#### § 360.61 Payment after death.

After the death of the ward, and at any time prior to the representative's discharge, the representative of the estate will be entitled to obtain payment of a bond to which the ward was solely entitled.
###### Editorial Note on [Subchapter A of Chapter II](/current/title-31/chapter-II/subchapter-A)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at [78 FR 60697](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/78-FR-60697), Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 306.43 Voidance of assignments.

An assignment of a security to or for the account of another person, not completed by delivery, may be voided by a disclaimer of interest from that person. This disclaimer should be executed in the presence of an officer authorized to certify assignments of securities. Unless otherwise authorized by the Bureau, the disclaimer must be written, typed, or stamped on the back of the security in substantially the following form:

The undersigned as assignee of this security hereby disclaims any interest herein.

(Signature)

I certify that the above-named person as described, whose identity is well known or proved to me, personally appeared before me the \_\_\_ day of \_\_\_\_\_\_ (Month and year) at \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ (Place) and signed the above disclaimer of interest.

(seal)

(Signature and official designation of certifying officer)

In the absence of a disclaimer, an affidavit or affidavits should be submitted for consideration explaining why a disclaimer cannot be obtained, reciting all other material facts and circumstances relating to the transaction, including whether or not the security was delivered to the person named as assignee and whether or not the affiants know of any basis for the assignee claiming any right, title, or interest in the security. After an assignment has been voided, in order to dispose of the security, an assignment by or on behalf of the owner will be required.

[[38 FR 7078](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/38-FR-7078), Mar. 15, 1973, as amended at [64 FR 38126](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/64-FR-38126), July 15, 1999]
<PAGE>
 
                      DESKTOP DATA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES     EXHIBIT 11.1
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                  (UNAUDITED)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
 
                                                               THREE MONTHS ENDED   NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                  SEPTEMBER 30,       SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                                 1996       1995      1996      1995
                                                               ---------  --------  --------  --------
<S>                                                        <C>        <C>       <C>       <C>
 
Net income                                                       $1,202    $  564     $3,065   $1,167
Accretion of dividends on Series B redeemable
  preferred stock                                                     -       (34)         -     (101)
                                                                 ------    ------     ------  -------
Net income available for common
  stockholders                                                   $1,202    $  530     $3,065   $1,066
                                                                 ======    ======     ======  =======
 
Weighted average common shares outstanding,                       8,592     5,904      8,561    3,742
  assuming conversion of Series A, Series C, and
  Series D preferred stock as of the beginning of
  the period                                                          -     1,714          -    3,128
Weighted average shares to be issued sufficient
  to generate proceeds for the payment of
  dividends on the Series A preferred stock
  payable upon the Initial Public Offering                            -        84          -      154
Common stock equivalents outstanding, pursuant
  to the treasury stock method (1)                                  203       233        250      195
                                                                 ------    ------     ------  -------
 
Weighted average number of common and
 common equivalent shares outstanding
 in 1996; Pro forma weighted average number
 of common and common equivalent shares
 outstanding in 1995                                              8,795     7,935      8,811    7,219
                                                                 ------    ------     ------  -------
 
Net income per common and common
 equivalent share in 1996; Pro forma net
 income per common and common equivalent
 share in 1995                                                    $0.14     $0.07      $0.35    $0.15
                                                                 ======    ======     ======  =======
</TABLE>



(1)  For 1995, includes common stock options issued after July 1, 1994, pursuant
to the treasury stock   method, in accordance with Securities and Exchange
Commission Rules.
40309.

#### MAZZOLA v. SWIFT MANUFACTURING COMPANY.

Decided September 13, 1963.

*Roberts & Thornton,*for plaintiff in error.

*Hatcher, Stubbs, Land & Rothschild, Albert W. Stubbs, J. Madden Hatcher, Jr.,*contra.

Eberhardt, Judge.

Excepting to a judgment overruling his amended motion for new trial, plaintiff in error has abandoned the general grounds, but insists upon the special grounds all of which complain of the failure of the court to charge certain principles of law. In none of them is set forth the pleadings or the evidence supporting the charges which it is contended the court should have given, nor is there pointed out where in the record these are to be found. Thus no question is presented for decision. *Hardwick v. Georgia Power Co.,*100 Ga. App. 38 (5) (110 SE2d 24); *Hodges v. Gay,*100 Ga. App. 210 (110 SE2d 570); *Beecher v. Farley,*104 Ga. App. 785 (123 SE2d 184); *Pendry v. Addison,*105 Ga. App. 673 (1) (125 SE2d 523); *Byck v. Lawton,*218 Ga. 858 (4) (131 SE2d 176). Accordingly, the judgment must be

*Affirmed.*

*Felton, C. J., and Bussell, J., concur.*
40051.

#### MIDDLEBROOKS v. THE STATE.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

The defendant was indicted under *Code*§ 26-1405, such indictment charging him “with the offense of assault with intent to rob, for that the said Alfred Middlebrooks, on 25th day of June, 1962, in the county aforesaid, did then and there, unlawfully and with force and arms unlawfully and maliciously make an assault and battery upon one Henry Roberts, with intent then and there to rob him, said assault being made with the hands of the accused, being offense and dangerous weapon when used in the manner in which accused so used them in said assault. . .” The defendant demurred to such indictment because it failed to set out any offense under the laws of this State because it sought to charge that the defendant intended to rob with an offensive weapon and alleging the hands of the defendant were such offensive weapon, the hands not being an offensive weapon. The demurrer was overruled and upon the trial of the case the jury returned a verdict finding the defendant guilty of assault' and battery. Thereafter, the defendant’s amended motion for new trial assigning error on the judgment of the trial court which required the defendant to be sworn before he would allow his counsel to question him in order to elicit his statement, was overruled and error is now assigned on such judgment adverse to him. *Held:*

1. “Verbal absurdities will not render an indictment or other pleadings subject to demurrer,'where the language, taken as a whole, nevertheless clearly, accurately, and definitely charges a crime.” *Mixon v. State,*7 Ga. App. 805, 806 (68 SE 315).

(a) The allegations in the indictment which referred to hands as “being an offensive and dangerous weapon when used in the manner in which the accused so used them” was mere surplusage.

2. “As a matter of right the accused [is] entitled to be questioned by his counsel to elicit his unsworn statement to the *588court and jury in his defense.” *Shoffeitt v. State,*107 Ga. App. 217 (129 SE2d 572). See also Ferguson v. Georgia, 365 US 570 (81 SC 756, 5 LE2d 783), adhered to, 216 Ga. 794 (120 SE2d 123).

Decided April 5, 1963.

*Marvin Hartley, Jr., Casey Thigpen,*for plaintiff in error.

*Walter C. McMillan, Jr., Solicitor General,*contra.

(a) The trial court erred in overruling the defendant’s amended motion for new trial, based solely on the ground that the trial court erred in requiring the defendant to be sworn before allowing his counsel to question him in order to elicit his statement.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Frankum and Jordan, JJ., concur.*
#### Lucien G. SENESE, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross Appellee, v. CHICAGO AREA I.B. OF T. PENSION FUND, Defendant-Appellee, Cross Appellant.

Nos. 99-3666, 00-1211.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Feb. 9, 2001.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 9, 2001.

Before Hon. COFFEY, Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, and Hon. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

On January 30, 2001, the plaintiff-appellant/cross appellee filed a petition for rehearing. All the judges on the original panel have voted to deny a rehearing. Accordingly, the petition for rehearing is DENIED.
§ 510.404 Transactions ordinarily incident to a licensed transaction. ( a ) Any transaction ordinarily incident to a licensed transaction and necessary to give effect thereto is also authorized, except: ( 1 ) An ordinarily incident transaction, not explicitly authorized within the terms of the license, by or with the Government of North Korea, the Workers' Party of Korea, or any other person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 510.201(a);
( 2 ) An ordinarily incident transaction, not explicitly authorized within the terms of the license, involving a debit to a blocked account or a transfer of blocked property; or
( 3 ) An ordinarily incident transaction, not explicitly authorized within the terms of the license, with a foreign financial institution that is subject to sanctions pursuant to § 510.210 when the transaction is one that is prohibited by § 510.210.
( b ) For example, a license authorizing a person to complete a securities sale involving Company A, whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 510.201(a), also authorizes other persons to engage in activities that are ordinarily incident and necessary to complete the sale, including transactions by the buyer, broker, transfer agents, and banks, provided that such other persons are not themselves persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 510.201(a).
ex10-36.htm










Exhibit 10.36




 


First Amendment to the Aceto Corporation


 


2010 Equity Participation Plan


 


(Effective as of June 12, 2012)


 


Section 15(e) of the Aceto Corporation 2010 Equity Participation Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended to add the following sentence to the end thereof:


 


“Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 15(e), unless otherwise determined by the Committee, on each date that the Company pays a dividend or other distribution in cash to holders of Common Stock occurring after June 12, 2012, the Company shall accrue on behalf of the Grantee an amount in cash equal to (i) the number of Restricted Stock Units credited to the Grantee’s bookkeeping account on such date, multiplied by (ii) the dollar amount of the per share cash dividend.  Any such accrued amount  shall be paid to the Grantee in cash (without interest) on the date of vesting of the Restricted Stock Units to which such amount relates and shall be subject to the same restrictions as such Restricted Stock Units.”


 







 


ACETO CORPORATION


 







 


By:___________________________


 


        Douglas Roth


 


        Senior VP and Chief Financial Officer
#### § 20.615 Conviction.

*Conviction* means a finding of guilt (including a plea of nolo contendere) or imposition of sentence, or both, by any judicial body charged with the responsibility to determine violations of the Federal or State criminal drug statutes.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2656 Introduced in House (IH)]

                                    

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2656

                  For the relief of Norman M. Werner.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 16, 1995

Mr. Hall of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                  For the relief of Norman M. Werner.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ENTITLEMENT TO BENEFITS UNDER MEDICARE PART A.

    Notwithstanding section 226(a)(2) of the Social Security Act, 
Norman M. Werner of Tyler, Texas, shall be entitled to hospital 
insurance benefits provided under part A of title XVIII of such Act, 
beginning on the 1st day of the 1st month after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.

SEC. 2. WAIVER OF MEDICARE PART B LATE ENROLLMENT PENALTY.

    For purposes of section 1837 of the Social Security Act, the 
initial enrollment period for Norman M. Werner shall be the 7-month 
period that begins on the 1st day of the 1st month after the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```