alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
V

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1237

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade for the vessel DOPPLER EFFECT.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 14, 1995

Mr. OBERSTAR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

DOPPLER EFFECT.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

4 Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the Act of June 19, 1886

5 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 12106 of title 46,

6 United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may

7 issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate en8 dorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the
2

•HR 1237 IH

1 vessel DOPPLER EFFECT (hull identification number

2 MY137081C787).

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR US LONG DISTANCE CORP. AND
SUBSIDIARIES AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           8,766
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,790
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,262
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                51,812
<PP&E>                                          67,438
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,520
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 104,641
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,791
<BONDS>                                         11,907
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           156
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,236
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   104,641
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               101,915
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   67,497
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,960
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 683
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,366
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,768
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,598
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,598
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
        

</TABLE>
1 

### Nesky, Anthony

To: Nesky, Anthony Subject: FW: Proposed New ISL Uranium Mining Water Pr otection Rules Hearing- please read - 6 new requests for public hearings near Crow Butte and Dewey Burdock

Attachments: EPA Letter re proposed water rules 3-20-15.pdf



### To: Ingrid Rosencrantz, Office of Radiation and Indoor Air,

Radiation Protection Di vision, Mailcode 6608T,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460; Rosencrantz.ingrid@epa.gov

.



### Dear Ms. Rosencrantz,

I am sure you are aware that the ar ea around Western Nebraska has hosted the Crow Butte ISL/ISR mine near Crawford, NE (Dawes County NE) for the past 30 years; and the renewal and expansion permits are the subject

of interventions and contentions at the ASLBP. I am sure you are aware that about 30 miles away,

Azaria/Powertech has receive d a license to develop an ISL/ISR mine at Dewey-Burdock in Fall River County, SD which abuts Dawes County, NE.

Accordingly, the public is absolutely shocked that th ere are planned public heari ngs in TX and WY but ZERO PUBLIC HEARINGS are planned for Chadron, NE - this despite the fact that NRC typically includes the Chadron, NE area in public hearings like this - like wa s done when the GSEIS heari ngs took place several years

ago

I am writing to ask you to schedule a public hearing on th e proposed EPA regulations, new Subpart F, to take place at Chadron, NE at a time that is consistent with wh en the TX and WY hearings are going to be held. The people at Pine Ridge Indian Reserva tion are severely impacted by the Crow Butte operations at Crawford, NE and will be impacted by the new EPA regulations on groundwater protection and monitoring. Accordingly, fairness dictates that the people of Pine Ridge Indian Reservation, the pe ople of Fall River and Custer County South Dakota, and the people of Dawes County, NE, be a fforded the opportunity to make their views known at a public hearing just like the peopl e in TX and WY are being given.

Kindly schedule a Chadron NE hearing for as soon as possible.

Sincerely,

David Frankel arm.legal@gmail.com

Attorney for Western Nebr aska Resources Council, Owe Aku, Aligning for Re sponsible Mining, and

Consolidated Intervenors in re: Crow Butte Renewal, in re: Crow Butte North Trend, in re: Powertech (Azarga)2 From: Lilias Jarding [ mailto:liliasjarding@gmail.com ]

Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 12:49 PM

To: Rosencrantz, Ingrid
Subject: RE: Proposed New ISL Uranium Mining Water Protection Rules Hearing



### Please see attached letter --
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned, being the Chief Financial Officer of Texas Eastern Products
Pipeline Company, LLC, the sole general partner of TEPPCO Partners, L.P. (the
Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004, filed with
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company. This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-Q. A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to TEPPCO Partners, L.P.
and will be retained by TEPPCO Partners, L.P. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. April 28, 2004   /s/ CHARLES H. LEONARD
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2007-1017 

CHARLES W. PARKER, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

MICROSOFT CORPORATION, 

Defendant. 

Charles W. Parker, of Durham, North Carolina, pro se. 

 

 

Appealed from: United States District Court for the District of Columbia 

Judge Henry H. Kennedy, Jr. 
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

 

2007-1017 

CHARLES W. PARKER, 

 Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

MICROSOFT CORPORATION, 

 Defendant. 

 __________________________ 

DECIDED: January 10, 2007 

 __________________________ 

Before LOURIE, LINN, and MOORE, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM. 

Charles W. Parker (“Parker”) appeals a final judgment of the United States 

District Court for the District of Columbia dismissing his patent infringement action 

against Microsoft Corporation as frivolous. Parker v. Microsoft Corp., No. 06-CV-00540 

(D.D.C. Mar. 23, 2006). We review a district court’s frivolousness determination for an 

abuse of discretion. Denton v. Hernadez, 504 U.S. 24, 32 (1992). Parker’s allegations 

that he has patented the “elemental atom” and that Microsoft has infringed his rights by 

using and improperly claiming inventorship of such an invention are “fanciful,” 

“fantastic,” and “delusional” contentions supporting the district court’s determination. Id.

at 33-34. On appeal, Parker provides us with no persuasive basis to conclude that the 

district court abused its discretion in dismissing the action. We affirm.
# --- -- - - - ------ --- - - - - - ---- - -------

Snowy Owl Productions

1 December 2015 U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave S.E
. Washington, D.C. 4200 James Ray Drive Suite 161 Grand Forks, ND 58202 Tel: 701-738-4825 matt@skyskopes.com

Re: Amendment to Snowy Owl Productions, LLC Exemption No. 11752 Regulatory Docket No. FM-2015-0947 Dear Sir orMadam: Snowy Owl Productions, LLC ("Snowy Owl") requests an amendment to FAA Exemption No
. 11752, DocketNo. FAA-2015-0947 for the purpose ofadding UAS flight training to the grant of exemption under the same terms and conditions expressed in exemption No. 13465 and 13465A granted to Kansas State University. Snowy Owl has previously been permitted to use the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+, DJI Inspire 1, Aeryon SkyRanger, and DJI SIOOO+ to conduct aerial data collection, and now wishes to conduct flight training withthese aircraft as they are all electric, under 30 lbs, small in size, and similar to the aircraft approved in ExemptionNo
. 13465 and 13465A. The requested amendment will permit commercial training operations with the previously approved UAs under the same training terms and conditions as those expressed in Exemption No. 13465 and 13465A granted to Kansas State University. Ifwe canprovide any additional information to assist your understanding orreview ofthis document, please do not hesitate to contact us at 701-738-4825 or via email at matt@skyskopes.com
. Thank you, 

# 11--4--
Matt Dtmlevy President and CEO
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

Editorial Note on Part 360
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 360 appear at 79 FR 8860, Feb. 14, 2014.

§ 360.0 Applicability. ( a ) The regulations in this part apply to definitive (paper) Series I savings bonds that have not been converted to book-entry bonds through TreasuryDirect®.
( b ) The regulations in 31 CFR part 363 apply to: ( 1 ) book-entry Series I savings bonds that were originally issued as book-entry bonds in TreasuryDirect®; and
( 2 ) definitive Series I savings bonds that have been converted to book-entry bonds through TreasuryDirect®.
[70 FR 14942, Mar. 23, 2005]
§ 20.2106-2 Estates of nonresidents not citizens; deductions for expenses, losses, etc. ( a ) In computing the taxable estate of a nonresident who was not a citizen of the United States at the time of his death, deductions are allowed under sections 2053 and 2054 for expenses, indebtedness and taxes, and for losses, to the following extent: ( 1 ) A pledge or subscription is deductible if it is an enforceable claim against the estate and if it would constitute an allowable deduction under paragraph (a)(2) of § 20.2106-1, relating to charitable, etc., transfers, if it had been a bequest.
( 2 ) That proportion of other deductions under sections 2053 and 2054 is allowed which the value of that part of the decedent's gross estate situated in the United States at the time of his death bears to the value of the decedent's entire gross estate wherever situated. It is immaterial whether the amounts to be deducted were incurred or expended within or without the United States. For purposes of this subparagraph, an amount which is includible in the decedent's gross estate under section 2107(b) with respect to stock in a foreign corporation shall be included in the value of the decedent's gross estate situated in the United States. No deduction is allowed under this paragraph unless the value of the decedent's entire gross estate is disclosed in the estate tax return. See paragraph (b) of § 20.2106-1.
( b ) In order that the Internal Revenue Service may properly pass upon the items claimed as deductions, the executor should submit a certified copy of the schedule of liabilities, claims against the estate, and expenses of administration filed under any applicable foreign death duty act. If no such schedule was filed, the executor should submit a certified copy of the schedule of these liabilities, claims and expenses filed with the foreign court in which administration was had. If the items of deduction allowable under section 2106(a)(1) were not included in either such schedule, or if no such schedules were filed, then there should be submitted a written statement of the foreign executor containing a declaration that it is made under the penalties of perjury setting forth the facts relied upon as entitling the estate to the benefit of the particular deduction or deductions.
[T.D. 6296, 23 FR 4529, June 24, 1958; 25 FR 14021, Dec. 31, 1960, as amended by T.D. 7296, 38 FR 34197, Dec. 12, 1973; T.D. 8612, 60 FR 43552, Aug. 22, 1995]
§ 50.100 Federal cause of action and remedy. ( a ) *General.* If the Secretary certifies an act as an act of terrorism pursuant to subpart G of this part, there shall exist a Federal cause of action for property damage, personal injury, or death arising out of or resulting from such act of terrorism, pursuant to section 107 of the Act, which shall be the exclusive cause of action and remedy for claims for property damage, personal injury, or death arising out of or relating to such act of terrorism, except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section.
( b ) *Jurisdiction.* For each determination described in paragraph (a) of this section, not later than 90 days after the Secretary certifies an act as an act of terrorism, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation shall designate a single district court or, if necessary, multiple district courts of the United States that shall have original and exclusive jurisdiction over all actions for any claim (including any claim for loss of property, personal injury, or death) relating to or arising out of an act of terrorism subject to section 107 of the Act.
( c ) *Effective period.* The exclusive Federal cause of action and remedy described in paragraph (a) of this section shall exist only for causes of action for property damage, personal injury, or death that arise out of or result from acts of terrorism during the effective period of the Program.
( d ) *Rights not affected.* Nothing in section 107 of the Act or this subpart shall in any way: ( 1 ) Limit the liability of any government, organization, or person who knowingly participates in, conspires to commit, aids and abets, or commits any act of terrorism;
( 2 ) Affect any party's contractual right to arbitrate a dispute; or
( 3 ) Affect any provision of the Air Transportation Safety and System Stabilization Act (Pub. L. 107-42; 49 U.S.C. 40101 note).
§ 31.3405(a)-1 Questions and answers relating to Federal income tax withholding on periodic retirement and annuity payments. ( a ) The questions and answers in this section relate to Federal income tax withholding on periodic payments under section 3405(a), as amended by section 11041(c)(2)(G) of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (Pub. L. 115-97, 131 Stat. 2054 (2017)). The withholding rules of section 3405(a) do not apply to periodic payments that are eligible rollover distributions (as defined in section 402(f)(2)(A)). See generally section 3405(c) and § 31.3405(c)-1 for Federal income tax withholding rules applicable to eligible rollover distributions. See section 3405(e)(13) for additional rules applicable to certain periodic payments under section 3405(a) and nonperiodic distributions under section 3405(b) that are to be delivered outside the United States and its possessions. For additional guidance regarding periodic payments, see §§ 35.3405-1 and 35.3405-1T of this chapter.
( b ) ( 1 ) Q-1: How will Federal income tax be withheld from a periodic payment?
( 2 ) A-1: In the case of a periodic payment that is subject to withholding under section 3405(a), amounts are withheld as if the payment were a payment of wages by an employer to the employee for the appropriate payroll period. If the payee has not furnished a withholding certificate, the amount to be withheld is determined in the manner described in the applicable forms, instructions, publications, and other guidance prescribed by the Commissioner. The rules for withholding when the payee has not furnished a withholding certificate apply regardless of whether the payor is aware of the payee's actual marital status or actual Federal income tax filing status.
( c ) (1) Q-2: Do rules similar to those for wage withholding apply to the furnishing of a withholding certificate for periodic payments? (2) A-2: Yes. Unless the rules of section 3405 specifically conflict with the rules of section 3402, the rules for withholding on periodic payments that are not eligible rollover distributions will parallel the rules for wage withholding. Thus, if a withholding certificate is furnished by a payee, it will generally take effect in accordance with section 3402(f)(3) and as provided in applicable forms, instructions, publications, and other guidance prescribed by the Commissioner. If no withholding certificate is furnished, the amount withheld must be determined in the manner described in the applicable forms, instructions, publications, and other guidance prescribed by the Commissioner for withholding on periodic payments when no withholding certificate is furnished.
( d ) (1) Q-3: What is the applicability date of this section?
(2) A-3: This section applies with respect to periodic payments made after December 31, 2020. [T.D. 9920, 85 FR 61815, Oct. 1, 2020]
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
PUBLIC MEETING ON THE ENER GY CONSERVATION STANDARD
PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS AND ACTIVE MODE TEST PROCEDURE NOPR FOR
FLUORESCENT LAMP BALLASTS

U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585
Room 8E-089 April 26, 2010



### Purpose The Department is holding this public meeti ng to discuss the energy conservation standard preliminary analysis and the test procedure notice of proposed rulemaking (NOPR). DOE will also explain its plans for the remaining anal yses for each rulemaking. Lastly, DOE will seek comment on both rulemakings including planned methodologies, assumptions, and data sources.



### Agenda

9:00 - 9:05 am Welcome

Linda Graves

9:05 - 9:20 am Introductions, Age nda Review, Opening Statements Linda Graves and Jim Raba, Facilitator

9:20 - 10:00 am Test Procedure: Overview and Existing Method Matthew Walker, NCI

10:00 – 10:45 am Test Procedure: Alternative Methods Matthew Walker, NCI

10:45 - 11:00 am Break

11:00 - 12:00 pm Test Procedure: Proposed Method Matthew Walker, NCI

12:00 pm - 1:00 pm Break for Lunch (on your own)

1:00 – 1:10 pm Energy Cons ervation Standard Introduction, Statute, and
Context Ali Lehr, NCI

1:10 - 1:45 pm Market and Techno logy Assessment; Screening Analysis Ali Lehr, NCI1:45 - 2:30 pm Engineering Analysis Ali Lehr, NCI

2:30 – 2:45 pm Energy Use and Markup Analysis Bob Lingard, PNNL

2:45 - 3:00 pm Break

3:00 - 3:30 pm Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period Analysis Gavin McCormick, PNNL

3:30 - 4:00 pm National Impact Analysis Gavin McCormick, PNNL

4:00 - 4:15 pm Preliminary Ma nufacturer Impact Analysis Rob Carmichael, NCI

4:15 - 4:30 pm NOPR Analyses Bob Lingard, PNNL

4:30 - 5:00 pm Final Questions / Discussion
Linda Graves

5:00pm Closing Remarks and Adjourn
Linda Graves
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

###### Editorial Note on Part 357

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 357 appear at 70 FR 57431, Sept. 30, 2005.

#### § 357.10 Laws governing a Treasury book-entry security, TRADES, and security interests or entitlements.

(a) *What law governs the rights and obligations of the United States and the Federal Reserve Banks; and the rights of any Person against the United States and the Federal Reserve Banks?* Except as we provide in paragraph (b) of this section, the following are governed solely by Treasury regulations, including the regulations of this part, the applicable offering circular (which is 31 CFR part 356, in the case of securities issued on and after March 1, 1993), the announcement of the offering, and Federal Reserve Bank Operating Circulars:

(1) The rights and obligations of the United States and the Federal Reserve Banks with respect to a Book-entry Security or Security Entitlement and the operation of TRADES, and

(2) The rights of any Person, including a Participant, against the United States and the Federal Reserve Banks with respect to a Book-entry Security or Security Entitlement and the operation of TRADES.

(b) *What law governs security interests in Security Entitlements that are not recorded on a Federal Reserve Bank's books?* See the following table:

| If a security interest in a security entitlement is— | And it is— | Then it is governed by— |
| --- | --- | --- |
| (1) in favor of a Federal Reserve Bank from a Participant | not recorded on the books of a Federal Reserve Bank pursuant to § 357.12(e)(2) | the law (not including the conflict-of-law rules) of the jurisdiction where the head office of the Federal Reserve Bank maintaining the Participant's Securities Account is located. |
| (2) in favor of a Federal Reserve Bank from a Person that is not a Participant | not recorded on the books of a Federal Reserve Bank pursuant to § 357.12(e)(2) | the law determined in the manner specified in § 357.11. |

(c) *What law governs if the jurisdiction in paragraph (b)(1) of this section did not adopt Revised Article 8, or Revised Article 8 as amended by Revised Article 9 (both incorporated by reference, see Sec. 357.2)?* The law specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this section shall be the law of that State as though that State adopted Revised Article 8.