alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 1 (Monday, January 4, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 140]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-33064]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Thirty-Eighth Meeting: RTCA Special Committee (224) Airport 
Security Access Control Systems

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of Thirty-Eighth RTCA Special Committee 224 Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
Thirty-Eighth RTCA Special Committee 224 meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held January 28, 2016 from 10:00 a.m.-3:00 
p.m.

ADDRESS: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1150 18th Street NW., 
Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, Tel: (202) 330-0680.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-
9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org or 
Karan Hofmann, Program Director, RTCA, Inc., khofmann@rtca.org, (202) 
330-0680.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of RTCA Special Committee 224. The agenda 
will include the following:

Thursday, January 28, 2016

1. Welcome/Introductions/Administrative Remarks
2. Review/Approve Previous Meeting Summary
3. Report from the TSA
4. Report on Safe Skies on Document Distribution
5. Report on TSA Security Construction Guidelines progress
6. Review of DO-230G Sections
7. Review of DO-230H Sections
8. Action Items for Next Meeting
9. Time and Place of Next Meeting
10. Any Other Business
11. Adjourn

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Plenary information will be 
provided upon request. Persons who wish to present statements or obtain 
information should contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may present a 
written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on December 29, 2015.
Latasha Robinson,
Management & Program Analyst, Next Generation, Enterprise Support 
Services Division, Federal Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2015-33064 Filed 12-31-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office

Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800

Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001

39–362 PDF 2007

S. HRG. 110–314

[ERRATA]

OVERSIGHT HEARING ON RESEARCH AND

TREATMENT FOR GULF WAR ILLNESSES

HEARING

BEFORE THE

COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS 

UNITED STATES SENATE

ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS

FIRST SESSION

SEPTEMBER 25, 2007

Printed for the use of the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

(

Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/senate 

[ERRATA] 

The referenced hearing held before the Senate Committee on 

Veterans’ Affairs was inadvertently printed with an incomplete 

Senate hearing number. The Senate hearing number is ‘‘S. HRG. 

110–314’’. Additionally, the year printed should read 

‘‘Washington : 2008’’.
## Martin, Michael (OST)
From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Cc: Subject: Attachments:
Everyone: Martin, Michael (OST) Wednesday, February 20, 2013 12:35 PM bobh@flyyra.com; Nancy Tia Brown (mayornancy@cityofcody.com) Brad Rawson; Devany, Dennis (OST) Essential Air Service at Cody SkyWest COD bid Feb2013.pdf ,.**~** ·. .-:**~·** •.

Iwould like to update you on the Essential Air Service (EAS) situation at Cody, and give you an opportunityto offerany comments on the record before we submit a recommendation to the Assistant Secretary forAviation and International Affairs. We issued Order2013-1-9, January 16,2013, requesting proposals from airlines interested in providing EAS for a newterm. In response to our request, SkyWest, the incumbent, was the onlyairline to submit a proposal.
I have attached SkyWest's proposal foryour review. I expect the proposal to be uploaded on www.regulations.gov by late this afternoon. I request thatyou reviewthe proposal and submit any commentsyou may have as soon as possible, but no laterthan Thursday, March 7. Please send yourcomments directlyto me via e-mail at michael.f.martin@dot.gov. Also, please forward this e-mail to all relevant parties that I have not included on this email.
Ifyou have any questions, feel free to contact me. Regards,
Michael Martin United States Department ofTransportation Essential Air Service (EAS) and Small CommunityAir Service Development Program (SCASDP) (202) 366-6494

1
#### § 546.307 [Reserved]
C h a r l e s R o s s V a u g h n

2 0 M a y o S t

.

A p t

. J 1

R a l e i g h

, N C 2 7 6 0 3

( 8 0 3 ) 5 3 0

­ 4 2 1 9

E x e m p t i o n :

I a m s e e k i n g a S e c t i o n 3 3 3 E x e m p t i o n t o o p e r a t e m y D J I P h a n t o m 3 P r o f e s s i o n a l c o m m e r c i a l l y

f o r f r e e l a n c e w o r k a r o u n d t h e c o u n t r y

.

A i r c r a f t :

D J I P h a n t o m 3 P r o f e s s i o n a l

R e l i e f :

I a m s e e k i n g t h i s e x e m p t i o n b e c a u s e I a m a r e s p o n s i b l e U A S p i l o t a n d v i d e o g r a p h e r w h o

w i s h e s t o e x p a n d m y s e r

v i c e s i n a r e s p o n s i b l e m a n n e r

.

W h y :

T h e r e a s o n I a m f i l i n g t h i s e x e m p t i o n i s b e c a u s e I w a n t t o u s e m y U A S t o s h o w p e o p l e h o w

b e a u t i f u l o u r w o r l d i s t h r o u g h m y v i d e o s

. I h a v e m a n y c l i e n t s t h a t r e q u e s t a e r i a l f o o t a g e t o

e n g a g e p o t e n t i a l c u s t o m e r s a n d h a v e t o d e n y t h i s s e r v i c e b e c a u s e o f t h e c u r r e n t l a w

. T h i s

e x e m p t i o n w o u l d a l l o w m e t o d e m o n s t r a t e r e s p o n s i b l e f l y i n g w h i l e s h o w i n g o f f t h e b e a u t y o f t h e

w o r l d t h r o u g h m y c l i e n t s ’ w o r k

.

S a f e t y :

I a m a l w a y s a r e s p o n s i b l e p i l o t

, n e v e r f l y i n g a b o v e t h e r e q u i r e d 4 0 0 f t a n d a l w a y s m a i n t a i n i n g

d i r e c t l i n e o f s i g h t

. B e f

o r e e a c h f l i g h t I e n s u r e p r o p e r b a t t e r y l e v e l s

, p r o p e r r a d i o

c o m m u n i c a t i o n

, I h a v e f i l e d p r o p e r S m a l l U A S C e r t i f i c a t e o f R e g i s t r a t i o n a n d f o l l o w a l l

g u i d e l i n e s s e t b y t h e F A

A

.P e r s o n a l :

T h i s e x e m p t i o n w o u l d r e a l l y m e a n a l o t t o m e

. I a m a n a s p i r i n g v i d e o g r a p h e r a n d b y g r a n t i n g

m e t h i s e x e m p t i o n

, i t w o u l d o p e n u p a w o r l d o f p o s s i b i l i t i e s

. I t a k e t h e t i m e t o b e s a f e w h e n

f l y i n g

, a n d w o u l d c o n t i n u e t o d o s o u p o n g r a n t e d e x e m p t i o n

. I a s k t h a t y o u g r a n t t h i s e x e m p t i o n

s o t h a t I c a n i n s p i r e o t h e r s t h r o u g h m y w o r k

.
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office

Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800

Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001

39–599 PDF 2007

S. HRG. 110–327

[ERRATA]

HEARING ON THE CURRENT STATE OF

AFFAIRS FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

WITH VA

HEARING

BEFORE THE

COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS 

UNITED STATES SENATE

ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS

FIRST SESSION

SEPTEMBER 19, 2007

Printed for the use of the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

(

Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/senate 

[ERRATA] 

The referenced hearing held before the Senate Committee on 

Veterans’ Affairs was inadvertently printed without the Senate 

hearing number. The Senate hearing number is ‘‘S. HRG. 110–327’’. 

Additionally, the year printed should read ‘‘Washington : 2008’’.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 161 (Friday, August 21, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42284-42288]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20008]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal Nos. 09-48]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 
601-3740.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittals 09-48 with attached transmittal and 
policy justification.

    Dated: August 12, 2009.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 42285]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21AU09.034


[[Page 42286]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21AU09.035


[[Page 42287]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21AU09.036


[[Page 42288]]


[FR Doc. E9-20008 Filed 8-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
BATHYMETRIC MAP

PILLSBURY
NOS NH 17-12
#### § 542.303 Deceptive transaction.

The term *deceptive transaction,* as used in § 542.212, means any transaction where the identity of any person subject to United States sanctions concerning Syria is withheld or obscured from other participants in the transaction or any relevant regulatory authorities.

[89 FR 48318, June 6, 2024]
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 19
- 00080
- CV

K. A. V., Appellant

v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D
- 1
- FM
- 18
- 000880 , THE HONORABLE DARL ENE B YRNE, JUDGE PRESIDIN G

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant K.A.V. filed her notice of appeal on February 6, 2019 . The appellate record was complete February 20, 2019 , making appellant’s brief due March 12, 2019

. On March 26, 2019 , t his Court ordered Harry Wa de Deckard to file appellant’s brief no later than April 10, 2019

. A supplemental clerk’s record containing a March 27, 2019 order appointing John Sigman as counsel of record was received in this Court o n April 11, 2019

.

The rules of judicial administrati on accelerate the final disposition of appeals from suits for termination of parental rights. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a) (providing 180 days for court’s final disposition). The accelerated schedule requires greater compliance with briefing
deadlines. Therefore, we order counsel to file appellant’s brief no later than April 29 , 2019 . If2

the brief is not filed by that date, counsel may be required to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of court.

It is ordered on April 12, 2019.

Before Ch ief Justice Rose, Justices Kelly and Smith
HomeDiplomatic Security Service Memorial...Robert  McCoy

# 				 Robert  McCoy			

				Third-Party Contractor			

Deceased				September 7, 2005			

**Private collection image**Back to DSS Memorial

Tags

Diplomatic Security Service MemorialIraq

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Assistant Secretary of State Satterfield Travels to Arizona and Hawaii

# 									Assistant Secretary of State Satterfield Travels to Arizona and Hawaii							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

April 17, 2024

Assistant Secretary of State for Educational and Cultural Affairs Lee Satterfield will travel to Tempe, Arizona and Honolulu, Hawaii from April 17 to April 24.

While in Arizona, Assistant Secretary Satterfield will meet with Arizona State University (ASU) officials and participants in U.S. exchange programs to thank ASU for its longstanding partnership in advancing people-to-people ties through U.S. programs.  The visit will underscore the United States’ commitment to international education as a key component of public diplomacy and highlight the value of foreign policy through domestic engagement.

While in Hawaii, Assistant Secretary Satterfield will deliver remarks on the importance of promoting connections between the United States and the Indo-Pacific region at the East-West Center Board of Governors’ meeting.  Additionally, the Assistant Secretary will also meet with INDOPACOM officials to discuss the important role Department exchange programs play in strengthening linkages between emerging leaders in government, business, and civil society across the Pacific and the United States.

For further information, please contact ECA Press at ECA-Press@state.gov or visit www.eca.state.gov.

Tags

ArizonaBureau of Educational and Cultural AffairsCivil SocietyEducationHawaiiIndo-PacificOffice of Public LiaisonOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial Domestic TravelPublic DiplomacyTravel

Back to Top
g

UNITED STATES

BATHYMETRIC MAP

WAING SEA
ZHEMCHUG SPUR

Pthtbed af Wethrgpen, If
U5. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
MATONAL OCLAMOT AMD ATMO DMEESTRATION

An SERVICE

PEARL MEFCATOR PHOWETION
eule 1.28006

ZHEMCHUG SPUR
NOS NO 1.4
#### § 510.300 Applicability of definitions.

The definitions in this subpart apply throughout the entire part.
#### RELUME CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DIALIGHT CORPORATION, Ecolux, Inc., and Precision Solar Controls, Inc., Defendants, and Lumileds Lighting BV, Philips Lighting BV, and Hewlett-Packard Company, Defendants-Cross Appellants.

Nos. 00-1164, 00-1180.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 8, 2001.

Rehearing Denied March 6, 2001.

Before CLEVENGER, SCHALL, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges.

*894CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.

Relume Corporation (“Relume”) appeals from the summary judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, holding that the defendants’ accused products do not literally infringe the asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 5,661,645 (“the ’645 patent”) or U.S. Patent No. 5,783,909 (“the ’909 patent”), both assigned to Relume, and holding that both patents are invalid. *Relume Corp. v. Dialight Corp.,*63 F.Supp.2d 788, 802 (E.D.Mich.1999). We *affirm.*

I

Relume raises several arguments on appeal: (1) whether the district court erred in its interpretation of certain limitations in the patents, (2) whether such errors in claim interpretation led to errors in the court’s analysis of the validity issues, (3) whether disputed issues of material fact preclude summary judgment on the validity issues, and (4) whether alleged errors in claim interpretation or the disputed issues of material fact undercut the district court’s judgment of no literal infringement.

II

We have fully reviewed the careful, extensive and well-crafted opinion of the district court. We have carefully examined the arguments presented by the parties in their briefs and have considered in full the arguments made by the parties at oral argument.

For the reasons stated in the opinion of the district court, we agree that all of the asserted claims of the ’645 and ’909 patents are invalid. Because we affirm the district court’s judgment on the validity issues, we need not reach the questions raised by Relume as to the judgment of noninfringement.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2630

AN ACT

To extend the deadline for commencement of conof Illinois. struction of a hydroelectric project in the State
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2630

AN ACT

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction

of a hydroelectric project in the State of Illinois.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2630 EH

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF COMMENCEMENT OF CON2 STRUCTION DEADLINE FOR HYDROELECTRIC

3 PROJECT IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the time period

5 specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16

6 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the Federal En7 ergy Regulatory Commission project numbered 3246, the

8 Commission shall, at the request of the licensee for the

9 project, in accordance with the good faith, due diligence,

10 and public interest requirements of that section and the

11 Commission’s procedures under that section, extend until

12 October 15, 1997, the time period during which the li13 censee is required to commence construction of the

14 project.

15 (b) APPLICABILITY.—Subsection (a) shall take effect

16 on the expiration of the extension, issued by the Commis17 sion under section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C.

18 806), of the period required for commencement of con19 struction of the project described in subsection (a).

20 (c) REINSTATMENT OF LICENSE.—The Commission

21 is authorized to reinstate the license for the project re-
3

•HR 2630 EH

1 ferred to in subsection (a), effective as of the date of its

2 expiration or termination.

Passed the House of Representatives April 16, 1996.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### § 558.802 Delegation of certain authorities of the Secretary of the Treasury.

Any action that the Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to take pursuant to E.O. 13664 of April 3, 2014, and any further Executive orders relating to the national emergency declared therein, may be taken by the Director of OFAC or by any other person to whom the Secretary of the Treasury has delegated authority so to act.
#### § 539.402 Effect of amendment.

Unless otherwise specifically provided, any amendment, modification, or revocation of any provision in or appendix to this part or chapter or of any order, regulation, ruling, instruction, or license issued by or under the direction of the Director of the Office of Foreign Assets Control does not affect any act done or omitted, or any civil or criminal suit or proceeding commenced or pending prior to such amendment, modification, or revocation. All penalties, forfeitures, and liabilities under any such order, regulation, ruling, instruction, or license continue and may be enforced as if such amendment, modification, or revocation had not been made.
§ 1010.930 Rewards for informants. ( a ) If an individual provides original information which leads to a recovery of a criminal fine, civil penalty, or forfeiture, which exceeds $50,000, for a violation of the provisions of the Bank Secrecy Act or of this chapter, the Secretary may pay a reward to that individual.
( b ) The Secretary shall determine the amount of the reward to be paid under this section; however, any reward paid may not be more than 25 percent of the net amount of the fine, penalty or forfeiture collected, or $150,000, whichever is less.
( c ) An officer or employee of the United States, a State, or a local government who provides original information described in paragraph (a) in the performance of official duties is not eligible for a reward under this section.
HI ——= = = — — ~ — — ——__
2 ft t » : 1 r tt * = t ; 5 T T T T T = ‘
i a gS :
LAr
=
Hi
' 1
r ry
,
iWweAe
a ‘a 3 i :
Sl ic —_—* —
é
ell
pee i
In!
1
we RATER es
i Ht il Hea il
als la Hat
hd Ti Haul aa mit itty
HE RH iit Bs id
THER ial
By i hy
ri
Hall
al
Yo
g
s a

NOS 1307N-11M
40139.

#### FITZGERALD MILLS CORPORATION v. KAUTZ et al.

Frankum, Judge.

1. In a dispossessory warrant proceeding brought by Fitzgerald Mills Corporation to recover possession of a described tract of land allegedly located in Land Lot 299 of the 4th Land District of Ben Hill County, the defendants, by counter affidavit, denied that they were holding possession of the premises described in the dispossessory warrant as tenants of the plaintiff, but that they claimed title to the property described as owners in fee simple. On the trial of the case it developed from the evidence that the real issue between the parties was as to the location of the line between their respective tracts. Both parties contended that this line was on the land lot line between Lot 299, lying to the west, and Lot 282, lying to the east. The defendants’ evidence showed clearly that they did not contend that they owned any land west of the land lot line. The case was apparently tried and the trial judge submitted the case to the jury on the theory that the only issue was the location of the land lot line between adjoining landowners, and as thus tried, the dispossessory warrant case was, in effect, converted into a processioning or ejectment case. This was not proper, as neither title to the land nor location of the land line was an issue to be sumitted to the jury in such a proceeding. *Cassidy v. Clark,*62 Ga. 412; *Jordan v. Jordan,*103 Ga. 482 (30 SE 265); *Patrick v. Cobb,*122 Ga. 80 (1) (49 SE 806); *Griffeth v. Wilmore,*46 Ga. App. 96 (166 SE 673); *Hamilton v. Darden,*58 Ga. App. 409 (198 SE 805); *Caffey v. Pattillo,*64 Ga. App. 382, 385 (13 SE2d 202).

2. The jury found in favor of the defendants and the necessary interpretation of that finding under the evidence was that the relation of landlord and tenant did not exist between the parties. We cannot say that the evidence demanded that finding, and the assignments of error in special grounds 5 and 6 of the motion complaining of portions of the charge which submitted to the jury the issue as to the location of the land lot line as though the case were one for processioning show errors which were probably harmful and confusing to the jury and which require the grant of a new trial. *Kendrick v. Blackwell,*189 Ga. 225 (5 SE2d 633). The other assignments of error relate to matters not likely to recur on another *298trial of the case and are not passed on at this time.

Decided September 10, 1963.

*McDonald, McDonald*<fc *Mills, Ben B. Mills, Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*Jay, Garden & Jay, Clayton Jay, Jr.,*contra.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.*
#### In re John A. ADAMS, Debtor. *210John A. Adams, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Council, Baradel, Kosmerl & Nolan, P.A., Defendant-Appellee, and George W. Liebmann, Party in Interest.

No. 00-2427.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 22, 2001.

Decided Feb. 27, 2001.

John A. Adams, pro se. Kevin Michael Schaeffer, Council, Baradel, Kosmerl & Nolan, P.A., Annapolis, MD, for appellee.

Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

John A. Adams appeals from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders (1) determining that his debt of attorney’s fees were nondischargeable in his bankruptcy case, and (2) denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the lower courts’ opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *Adams v. Council Baradel, 254*B.R. 857 (D.Md.2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*