alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131481 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131481 

 COA: 268710 

Kent CC: 04-002654-FC 

RANDY MARLAN HAYNES, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 24, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p1023 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2006 

 Clerk
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

###### Editorial Note on Part 360

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 360 appear at 79 FR 8860, Feb. 14, 2014.

#### § 360.65 Reissue.

A bond on which a minor or other person under legal disability is named as the owner or coowner, or in which he or she has an interest, may be reissued under the following conditions, but only in accordance with subpart H of this part:

(a) A minor for whose estate no representative has been appointed may request reissue if the minor is of sufficient competency to sign his or her name to the request and to understand the nature of the transaction.

(b) Except to the extent provided in paragraph (a) of this section, reissue will be restricted to a form of registration which does not adversely affect the existing ownership or interest of a minor or other person under legal disability. Requests for reissue should be executed by the person authorized to request payment under §§ 360.60 and 360.63, or the person who may request recognition as voluntary guardian under § 360.64.
#### § 401.2 Custody.

Each vessel, vehicle, or aircraft seized pursuant to the said act of August 9, 1939, and the regulations in this part shall forthwith be placed by the seizing officer in the custody of the District Director of Customs for the customs district in which such seizure is made. Such placing in custody shall be effected by immediate notification of the appropriate District Director of Customs of the seizure, together with a statement of the facts including a description of the vessel, vehicle, or aircraft, and the holding by the seizing officer of such vessel, vehicle, or aircraft subject to the instructions of the said district director of customs.
#### § 550.405 Setoffs prohibited.

A setoff against blocked property (including a blocked account), whether by a U.S. financial institution or other U.S. person, is a prohibited transfer under § 550.201 if effected after the effective date.
# Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali C 40/2012

| | ISSN 1977-0987
  doi:10.3000/19770987.C_2012.040.mlt |
| --- | --- |
| Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali
  tal-Unjoni Ewropea | C 40 |
| | |
| Edizzjoni bil-Malti | Informazzjoni u Avviżi | Volum 5511 ta' Frar 2012 |

ISSN 1977-0987

doi:10.3000/19770987.C_2012.040.mlt

Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali

tal-Unjoni Ewropea

C 40

Edizzjoni bil-Malti

Informazzjoni u Avviżi

Volum 5511 ta' Frar 2012

---

| Avviż Nru | Werrej | Paġna |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Avviżi |
| | PROĊEDURI AMMINISTRATTIVI |
| | Il-Parlament Ewropew |
| 2012/C 040/01 | Deċiżjoni | 1 |

Avviż Nru

Werrej

Paġna

V   Avviżi

PROĊEDURI AMMINISTRATTIVI

Il-Parlament Ewropew

2012/C 040/01

Deċiżjoni

1

| MT | |
| --- | --- |

MT

---

V Avviżi

PROĊEDURI AMMINISTRATTIVI

Il-Parlament Ewropew

| 11.2.2012 | MT | Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea | C 40/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2012

MT

Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea

C 40/1

---

DEĊIŻJONI

2012/C 40/01

IS-SEGRETARJU ĠENERALI TAL-PARLAMENT EWROPEW,

Wara li kkunsidra r-Regolamenti tal-Persunal tal-Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea u l-Kondizzjonijiet tal-Impjieg ta’ Impjegati Oħra tal-Unjoni Ewropea stabbiliti permezz tar-Regolament (KEE, Euratom, KEFA) Nru 259/68 tal-Kunsill u modifikati l-aħħar bir-Regolament (KE, Euratom) Nru 723/2004 tal-Kunsill, u partikolarment, l-Artikolu 30 ta' dawn ir-Regolamenti,

Wara li kkunsidra d-deċiżjoni tal-Bureau dwar il-ħatra tal-Awtorità tal-Ħatra modifikata l-aħħar fis-26 ta' Ottubru 2004,

Wara li kkunsidra l-avviżi ta' kompetizzjoni u ta' reklutaġġ:

PE/96/A, PE/97/A, A/94, A/95, A/96, AD/1/08, AD/3/08, AD/4/08, PE/99/S, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/106/S, PE/107/S, PE/109/S, B/174, B/175, B/176, C/348, AST/1/2005, AST/1/2006, AST/5/2008, PE/69/S, PE/96/S, PE/110/S,

Wara li kkunsidra l-opinjoni tal-Kumitat Konġunt mogħti waqt il-laqgħa tiegħu tas-26 ta' Ottubru 2011,

IDDEĊIEDA:

Artikolu Uniku

It-tul tal-validità tal-listi ta' riżerva tal-kompetizzjonijiet u tar-reklutaġġ Nri:

PE/96/A, PE/97/A, A/94, A/95, A/96, AD/1/08, AD/3/08, AD/4/08, PE/99/S, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/106/S, PE/107/S, PE/109/S, B/174, B/175, B/176, C/348, AST/1/2005, AST/1/2006, AST/5/2008, PE/69/S, PE/96/S, PE/110/S

se jiġi estiż sal-31 ta' Diċembru 2012.

Magħmul fil-Lussemburgu, it-18 ta’ Diċembru 2011.

Klaus WELLE

Segretarju Ġenerali

---
exh10-43.htm










Exhibit 10.43


 


Power of Attorney













The Educational Organization:  Shanghai Fuyi Education Information Consulting Co. Ltd. (“FUYI”)












The shareholders: Fenglong Xu and Wei Xu







The  Attorney-in-fact: Hangzhou Kunjiang Education Technology Co. Ltd., a Chinese company (“Party A”).







We, the Shareholders of FUYI, Chinese citizens, hereby irrevocably authorize Party A to exercise for and on behalf of me all voting rights that we have as FUYI Shareholders during the term of this Power of Attorney, including without limitation, proposing to convene a shareholders’ meeting, attending a shareholders’ meeting and exercising the voting rights at any and all shareholders’ meeting of FUYI.







Unless this Power of Attorney is expressly terminated by us in writing, this Power of Attorney shall be effective from the date it is signed for an indefinite period of time.












Fuyi Information Consulting USA Inc.







by:  /s/ Fenglong Xu









Great Holding Management Company Inc.







by:  /s/ Wei Xu









Effective date:  March 31, 2012
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 20, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-31001

Conference Calendar

 

THEODORE JOHNSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

STATE OF LOUISIANA, DEPARTMENT OF 

SOCIAL SERVICES, LOUISIANA REHABILITATION 

SERVICES,

Defendant-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 02-CV-3082-B

--------------------

Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Theodore Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s order

closing his lawsuit seeking review of the Secretary of the

Louisiana Department of Social Services’ decision to deny him

tuition assistance without prejudice to his right to reopen

proceedings after his state-court remedies are exhausted. 

This court must raise, sua sponte, the issue of its own

jurisdiction, if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660
No. 03-31001

-2-

(5th Cir. 1987). A timely notice of appeal is a mandatory

precondition to the exercise of appellate jurisdiction. 

Nelson v. Foti, 707 F.2d 170, 171 (5th Cir. 1983). Federal Rule

of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(1) requires that the notice of appeal

in a civil action be filed within 30 days of entry of the

judgment or order from which appeal is taken. 

Johnson did not file his notice of appeal within 30 days of

the entry of the order closing his case. The October 14, 2003,

notice of appeal is timely only as to the denial of his second

motion to reopen. However, Johnson makes no argument challenging

the denial of his motion to reopen and has thus waived the sole

ground for appeal. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25

(5th Cir. 1993); FED. R. APP. P. 28(a)(9)(A). Consequently, the

appeal is DISMISSED. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20

(5th Cir. 1983); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
[4910-13-

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

(Docket No. FAA-2010-0855j Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-066-AD; Amen

!~~~~D~P.!LI01-Iv

RlN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 737-300, -400, and -500

Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: We are superseding an existing airVolOrthinessdirective (AD) for the

e:-.~

ATE I

'"1r';lo

QliTlN(i J;YMBQL

- ~O

Nl ~.'r

QIfTJN{;SYMBQI,.

~i U

, it

Y

1

• ~

, ,

rV:>-z-' /0

OlJ"nNG SYMBOL

,

products listed above. That AD currently requires repetitive inspections for discrep ,

of the fuse pins of the inboard and outboard midspar fittings of the nacelle strut, an A'rE

corrective actions if necessary. This new AD requires replacing the midspar fuse pi FWur'NG,""HOL

with new, improved fuse pins, which would terminate the repetitive inspections. T' ,

'NrT<AUlSIG

was prompted by a report of corrosion damage of the chrome runout on the head sil\'pfu--c----

found on all four midspar fuse pins of the nacelle strut. Additionally, a large portiO~'~'~~f""I=;;-__

the chrome plate was missing from the corroded area of the shank. We are issuing ~:'~TM"Ol

'NITLALSI,LG

AD to prevent damage of the fuse pins of the inboard and outboard midspar fitting..,o"f-"th'fb'-- _

nacelle strut, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the fuse pins, andL'·"'"",,,,1"",,- __

MUTING S""BOL

consequent loss of the strut and separation of the engine from the airplane.

DATES: This AD is effective [INSERT DATE 35 DAYS AFTER DATE OF

PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER].
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM MAXXIM MEDICAL, INC'S 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED FEBRUARY 2, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-03-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-02-1997
<CASH>                                           5,614
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   85,505
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     91,515
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               195,367
<PP&E>                                         123,403
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,877
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 454,501
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           81,604
<BONDS>                                        128,750
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                     124,234
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   454,501
<SALES>                                        133,401
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               133,401
<CGS>                                          101,403
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,747
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (995)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,541
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,705
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,246
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,459
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,459
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .38
        

</TABLE>
HomeBiographies...Andrew P. Miller

# 				Andrew P. Miller			

															Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Israeli-Palestinian Affairs						Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs												

				December 5, 2022 -									Present							

Andrew P. Miller is the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Israeli-Palestinian Affairs in the Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs at the U.S. Department of State. Prior to this, he served as a Senior Policy Advisor to U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Linda Thomas-Greenfield, covering the Middle East and North Africa, counterterrorism, political-military affairs, and intelligence. From 2017 to 2020, Miller was the Deputy Director for Policy at the Project on Middle East Democracy (POMED) and a Nonresident Scholar in the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace’s Middle East Program.

Miller’s previous government assignments included serving as the Director for Egypt and Israel Military Issues on President Obama’s National Security Council from 2014 to 2017, where he was involved in deliberations regarding U.S. security assistance to Egypt and Israel and Middle East Peace, among other issues. He also worked at the U.S. Department of State in a variety of intelligence and policy roles, including in the Bureau of Intelligence and Research, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s Policy Planning Staff, and at the U.S. Embassies in Cairo and Doha. Miller earned a B.A. in Political Science from Dickinson College and an M.A. in Foreign Affairs from the University of Virginia.

Tags

Bureau of Near Eastern AffairsState Department OfficialUnited States Security Coordinator for Israel and the Palestinian Authority

Back to Top
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1253

To rename the San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge as the Don

Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 15, 1995

Mr. MINETA (for himself, Mr. DELLUMS, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. FARR, Mr. LANTOS, Mr. MILLER of California, Ms. PELOSI, and Mr. STARK) introduced

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

A BILL

To rename the San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge

as the Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SAN FRANCISCO BAY NATIONAL WILDLIFE REF4 UGE RENAMED AS DON EDWARDS SAN FRAN5 CISCO BAY NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE.

6 (a) REFUGE RENAMED.—The San Francisco Bay

7 National Wildlife Refuge (established by the Act entitled

8 ‘‘An Act to provide for the establishment of the San Fran9 cisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge’’, approved June 30,
2

•HR 1253 IH

1 1972 (86 Stat. 399 et seq.)), is hereby renamed and shall

2 be known as ‘‘the Don Edwards San Francisco Bay Na3 tional Wildlife Refuge’’.

4 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any statute,

5 rule, regulation, Executive order, publication, map, or

6 paper or other document of the United States to the San

7 Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge is deemed to refer

8 to the Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife

9 Refuge.

10 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The Act entitled

11 ‘‘An Act to provide for the establishment of the San Fran12 cisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge’’, approved June 30,

13 1972 (86 Stat. 399 et seq.), is amended by striking ‘‘San

14 Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge’’ each place it ap15 pears and inserting ‘‘Don Edwards San Francisco Bay

16 National Wildlife Refuge’’.

Æ
GAO/AIMD-00-219R Agricultural Hall of Fame

United States General Accounting Office

Washington, DC 20548

Accounting and Information

Management Division

B-285319

June 16, 2000

The Honorable Henry J. Hyde

Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary

House of Representatives

Subject: Federally Chartered Corporation: Review of the Financial Statement Audit

Report for the Agricultural Hall of Fame for 1997 and 1998

Dear Mr. Chairman:

As requested, we reviewed the audit report covering the financial statements of the

Agricultural Hall of Fame, a federally chartered corporation, for the years ended

December 31, 1997 and 1998. The Agricultural Hall of Fame was established to honor

farmers and others who have made outstanding contributions to the establishment,

development, advancement, or improvement of agriculture in the United States.

Federally chartered corporations are required under 36 U.S.C. 10101 to

• present the corporation’s assets and liabilities and reasonable detail on the corporation’s

income and expenses in annual financial statements,

• obtain an annual financial audit by an independent public accountant, and

• submit the auditor’s report and the corporation’s financial statements to the Congress.

The objective of our review was to determine whether the audit report complied with the

financial reporting requirements of the law. In carrying out our work, we reviewed the

corporation’s financial statements and the accompanying notes, performed certain analytical

procedures related to information presented in the financial statements, reviewed the

auditor’s report, and made inquiries to corporation officials or the auditor as we deemed

necessary. We did not review the auditor’s working papers. Our review disclosed no

reportable instances of noncompliance.
B-285319

Page 2 GAO/AIMD-00-219R Agricultural Hall of Fame

The audit report included the auditor’s opinion that the financial statements of the

corporation were presented fairly, in all material respects, in accordance with generally

accepted accounting principles. We are returning the audit report you sent with your letter.

Sincerely yours,

David L. Clark

Director, Audit Oversight and Liaison

w/o Enclosure

(911978)
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 354.8 Waiver of regulations.

The Secretary reserves the right, in the Secretary's discretion, to waive any provision(s) of the regulations in this part in any case or class of cases for the convenience of Sallie Mae, or in order to relieve any person or entity of unnecessary hardship, if such action is not inconsistent with law, does not adversely affect substantial existing rights, and the Secretary is satisfied that such action will not subject Sallie Mae to any substantial expense or liability.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-6672
JAMES NELSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PHYLLISS HOPKINS, Deputy Warden of Operations, Defendant - Appellee.

No. 95-7611
JAMES NELSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PHYLLISS HOPKINS, Deputy Warden of Operations, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-94-2217-2-18-AJ) Submitted: November 28, 1995 Decided: February 13, 19962 Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. No. 95-6672 dismissed and No. 95-7611 affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Nelson, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra J. Senn, STUCKEY & KOBROVSKY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint and denying hismotion to amend his complaint. We dismiss as interlocutory Appellant's first appeal of the district court's denial of his motion to amend his complaint. (No. 95-6672). In Appellant's second appeal (No. 95-7611), we have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions accepting the magistrate judge's recommendations and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Nelson v. Hopkins , No. CA-94-2217-2-18-AJ (D.S.C. Mar. 28, 1995; Sept. 29, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

No. 95-6672 - DISMISSED No. 95-7611 - AFFIRMED
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

Editorial Note on Part 353
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 353 appear at 79 FR 8859, Feb. 14, 2014.

§ 353.1 Official agencies. ( a ) The Bureau of the Fiscal Service of the Department of the Treasury is responsible for administering the Savings Bonds Program. Authority to process transactions has been delegated to the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis and may be delegated to other Federal Reserve Banks and Branches as fiscal agents of the United States. The Federal Reserve Banks and Branches, and their authority to process transactions as fiscal agents of the United States, are subject to change as determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, or his or her designee.
( b ) Information about savings bonds and savings bond transactions, including savings bond transaction forms and email contact information, is available through the Bureau of the Fiscal Service's Web site at *http://www.treasurydirect.gov .* Communications concerning transactions and requests for forms may also be addressed to: ( 1 ) The Bureau of the Fiscal Service, P.O. Box 7012, Parkersburg, WV 26106-7012; or
( 2 ) The Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Treasury Retail Securities Site, P.O. Box 214, Minneapolis, MN 55480-0214.
( c ) Notices and documents must be filed with the agencies referred to above and as indicated in these regulations.
[44 FR 76441, Dec. 26, 1979, as amended at 59 FR 10541, Mar. 4, 1994; 79 FR 8859, Feb. 14, 2014]
HomeBiographies...Geoffrey R. Pyatt

# 				Geoffrey R. Pyatt			

															Assistant Secretary						Bureau of Energy Resources												

				September 19, 2022 -									Present							

Tags

Bureau of Energy ResourcesState Department Official

Back to Top