alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2667 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2667

To allow employees of the United States Government who are placed under 
furlough to volunteer to come to work to serve the needs of the people 
                         of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

            November 19 (legislative day, November 18), 1995

    Mr. Barton of Texas (for himself, Mr. Davis, Mrs. Morella, Mr. 
  Gilchrest, Mr. Gutknecht, Mr. Ensign, and Mr. Wolf) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government 
                          Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To allow employees of the United States Government who are placed under 
furlough to volunteer to come to work to serve the needs of the people 
                         of the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF LIMITATION ON ACCEPTANCE OF VOLUNTARY SERVICES OF 
              EMPLOYEES OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT WHO ARE PLACED 
              UNDER FURLOUGH.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 1342 of title 31, United 
States Code, an officer or employee of the United States Government, or 
of the District of Columbia government, may accept the voluntary 
services of an employee of the United States Government, or an employee 
of the District of Columbia government, as the case may be, who is 
placed under furlough.
    (b) Applicability.--Subsection (a) shall apply to the acceptance of 
voluntary services of an employee of the United States Government, or 
an employee of the District of Columbia government, as the case may be, 
beginning on or after the date of the enactment of this Act and ending 
on the date on which funds are appropriated by law to provide for the 
pay of such employee, or ending on September 30, 1996, whichever occurs 
earlier.
                                 <all>
```
Appellant avers "judicial efficiency would best be served by allowing

[appellant] to move forward with this appeal."

Respondents have submitted a reply to appellant's response. 2 In their reply, respondents note that the "procedural posture in this case is flawed." Specifically, respondents indicate that rather than filing a motion for remand, they believe they should have filed a motion to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction, as the motion filed in the district court is a tolling motion, and thus the notice of appeal was premature. See NRAP 4(a)(5). Thus, as respondents note, the district court has jurisdiction to rule on the NRCP 59 motion without a remand from this court. NRAP 4(a)(6) (a premature notice of appeal does not divest the district court of jurisdiction). Thus, respondents aver that as all parties essentially want a new trial, this court should dismiss the appeal and the district court should resolve the pending tolling motion.

Appellant filed a response to respondents' motion for leave to file a reply to the motion for remand in excess of the page limit. Appellant argues that the motion should be denied as it improperly raises matters not related to the original motion or appellant's response to that motion.
See NRAP 27(a)(4) (a reply shall not present matters that do not relate to the response). While appellant is correct regarding the raising of matters not related to the response, in the interest of judicial efficiency, we elect to treat respondents' filing as a combined reply to the opposition and a motion for dismissal for lack of jurisdiction. See NRAP 2.

2 Cause appearing, we grant respondents' "Motion for Permission to File Reply in Excess of Page Limitation." NRAP 27(d)(2). Accordingly, the clerk shall file the ten-page reply that was submitted with the motion.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2
(0) 19474 enAfter consideration of all the parties' filings in this matter, we

grant respondent's motion to dismiss this appeal. As noted, the district court may resolve the pending NRCP 59 motion without a specific remand from this court. Further, either party may file a notice of appeal from any substantively appealable order entered by the district court. 

### See NRAP 3(a); NRAP 3A(b).

It is so ORDERED.

Parraguirre

cc: Eighth Judicial District Court Dept. 15 Jerry J. Kaufman, Settlement Judge Gibbs Giden Locher Turner Senet & Wittbrodt LLP Hutchison & Steffen, LLC Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3
( 1 :) 1947A at999
§ 31.6011(a)-5 Monthly returns. ( a ) *In general* — ( 1 ) *Requirement.* The provisions of this section are applicable in respect of the taxes reportable on returns required pursuant to § 31.6011(a)-1 or § 31.6011(a)-4. An employer (or other person) who is required by § 31.6011(a)-1 or § 31.6011(a)-4 to make quarterly or annual returns on any such form shall, in lieu of making such quarterly or annual returns, make returns of such taxes in accordance with the provisions of this section if the employer is so notified in writing by the IRS. Every employer (or other person) notified by the IRS shall make a return for the calendar month in which the notice is received, for each of the prior calendar months in the return period, and for each calendar month afterwards (whether or not wages are paid in any such month) until the employer has filed a final return or is required to make quarterly or annual returns pursuant to notification as provided in paragraph (a)(2) of this section. Each return required under this section shall be made on the form prescribed for making the return which would otherwise be required of the employer (or other person) under the provisions of § 31.6011(a)-1 or § 31.6011(a)-4, except that, if some other form is furnished by the IRS for use in lieu of such prescribed form, the return shall be made on such other prescribed form. The IRS may notify any employer (or other person)— ( i ) Who by reason of notification as provided in § 301.7512-1, is required to comply with the provisions of such § 301.7512-1; or
( ii ) Who failed to— ( A ) Make any return required pursuant to § 31.6011(a)-1 or § 31.6011(a)-4;
( B ) Pay tax reportable on any such form; or
( C ) Deposit any such tax as required under the provisions of § 31.6302-1.
( 2 ) *Termination of requirement.* The IRS, in its discretion, may notify the employer in writing that the employer shall discontinue the filing of monthly returns under this section. If the employer is so notified, the IRS will provide the employer with instructions for filing the final monthly return. Afterwards, the employer shall make quarterly or annual returns in accordance with the provisions of § 31.6011(a)-1 or § 31.6011(a)-4.
( b ) *Information returns on Form W-3 and Social Security Administration copies of Form W-2.* See § 31.6051-2 for requirements with respect to information returns on Form W-3 and Social Security Administration copies of Form W-2.
( c ) *Time and place for filing returns.* For provisions relating to the time and place for filing returns, see §§ 31.6071 (a)-1 and 31.6091-1, respectively.
[T.D. 6516, 25 FR 13032, Dec. 20, 1960; 25 FR 14021, Dec. 31, 1960, as amended by T.D. 7351, 40 FR 17145, Apr. 17, 1975; T.D. 7580, 43 FR 60154, Dec. 26, 1978; T.D. 8637, 60 FR 66133, Dec. 21, 1995; T.D. 9061, 68 FR 34799, June 11, 2003; T.D. 9405, 73 FR 37375, July 1, 2008]
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Barbados Independence Day

# 									Barbados Independence Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

November 30, 2021

On behalf of the United States of America, I extend my best wishes to the people of Barbados as you celebrate the 55th anniversary of your nation’s independence.

We value the strong partnership between the United States and Barbados and appreciate your continued leadership in promoting democracy, human rights, and security throughout the Caribbean.  The meeting of Prime Minister Mottley with Vice President Harris in Washington, D.C. in October served as a welcomed opportunity to discuss our shared goals and reaffirm the friendship between our countries.  We look forward to deepening our cooperation in the year ahead as we work together to ensure a full recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic, address the climate crisis, and promote a democratic, resilient, and prosperous Caribbean region.

Please accept our warmest congratulations and best wishes on this special occasion.

Tags

BarbadosBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 359.71 What is the role of Federal Reserve Banks and Branches?

(a) Federal Reserve Banks and Branches are fiscal agents of the United States. They are authorized to perform such services as we may request of them, in connection with the issue, servicing and redemption of Series I bonds.

(b) We have currently designated the following Federal Reserve Offices to provide savings bonds services:

| Servicing site | Reserve district served | Geographic area served |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Federal Reserve Bank, Buffalo Branch, 160 Delaware Avenue, Buffalo, NY 14202 | New York, Boston | Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey (Northern half), New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. |
| Federal Reserve Bank, Pittsburgh Branch, 717 Grant Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15219 | Cleveland, Philadelphia | Delaware, Kentucky (eastern half), New Jersey, (southern half), Ohio, Pennsylvania, West Virginia (northern panhandle). |
| Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, 701 East Byrd Street, Richmond, VA 23219 | Richmond, Atlanta | Alabama, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana (southern half), Maryland, Mississippi (southern half), North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee (eastern half), Virginia, West Virginia (except northern panhandle). |
| Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, MN 55401 | Minneapolis, Chicago | Illinois (northern half), Indiana (northern half), Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wisconsin. |
| Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, 925 Grand Boulevard, Kansas City, MO 64106 | Dallas, San Francisco, Kansas City, St. Louis | Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois (southern half), Indiana (southern half), Kansas, Kentucky (western half), Louisiana (northern half), Mississippi (northern half), Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Oregon, Tennessee (western half), Texas, Utah, Washington, Wyoming, Guam. |
**Exhibit 32.1**

** ** 

** ** 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

  

  

In connection with the Annual Report of Chee Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A Amendment #1 for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zhang Shufang, Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

  

 

 

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  

 

 

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

** ** 

  

  

 

 

 

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

June 30, 2020                                             By:

**/S/                      **Zhang Shufang

  

 

Name:              Zhang Shufang

  

                                                                                            Title:  President, Treasurer, Secretary and Director

                                                                                               (Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer)
g

UNITED STATES

BATHYMETRIC MAP

fasted at Wishewren. DC
US. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
WANGROAL OCEANC AND AIMOSHERIC AnMetUSTRATy
NATIONAL OCEAN 5

SEOAYHETRC CONTOUR AASTERVAL 20 MAETHAS 1D wamuninn SEI

PATI, WEAN (CWE Lore WATE

DOMENERORA WEW

‘CALIFORNIA COAST
NAVARRO CANYON

NAVARRO CANYON
(N390124W)

BATHYMETRIC MAP LMI34
HomeAssisted Schools...Banjul, The Gambia: Banjul American International School: 2024 Special Needs Profile

# 									Banjul, The Gambia: Banjul American International School: 2024 Special Needs Profile							

Special Needs Profile

Office of Overseas Schools

March 1, 2024

## 								School Contact Information							

        -  Tel: : +220-219-3800 | Overseas Schools Fact Sheet | Acting Regional Education Officer: Tim Stuart 
        -  E-mail: Director@BAISGambia.org; Admin@BAISGambia.org | Website: www.baisgambia.org 
        -  Additional details on special needs support at post found on the **School Summary Information Portal**(must have OKTA login to access).  For more information, contact A/OPR/OS (**overseasschools@state.gov** / +1-202-261-8200), MED/CFP Child and Family Program Team (**MEDCFP@state.gov**/ +1-202-663-1815), or the school directly.    

**Download the Special Needs Profile** (Banjul- 2024 Special Needs- Gambia [236 KB]) for this school to learn more about their capability to support students with exceptionalities.

**Banjul American International School** (BAIS) was founded in 1984. It is an independent, coeducational day school for English-speaking students of all nationalities from pre-Kindergarten (age 2+) through Grade 12 (age 18).  The school year extends from late August/early September to mid/late June with approximately 180 days of instruction. Official Gambian holidays are recognized, and long breaks are taken for the December/New Year and spring break.

*This is intended to provide general information. Prospective users of the schools may wish to inquire further of A/OPR/OS or contact the school directly for more specific and up-to-the-minute information. Information and statistics are current as of December 2023 and provided by the school.*

NOTE: School situations can change quickly, particularly as schools face cutbacks to learning support programs due to the pandemic, unrest, and economic uncertainty. For the most current information, work with the REO and school. Information in this document was collected by the Department of State’s Office of Overseas Schools directly from the school in December 2023 and shows the availability of services rather than an assessment of the quality of the services. The profile is intended as a jumping off point for a conversation with the REO and school to understand the best fit for your child. Definitions may vary school to school.

Tags

Office of Overseas SchoolsThe Gambia

Back to Top
§ 525.307 Licenses; general and specific. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in this part, the term *license* means any license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to this part.
( b ) The term *general license* means any license or authorization the terms of which are set forth in subpart E of this part or made available on OFAC's website: *www.treasury.gov/ofac .*
( c ) The term *specific license* means any license or authorization issued pursuant to this part but not set forth in subpart E of this part or made available on OFAC's website: *www.treasury.gov/ofac .*
Note 1 to § 525.307 .
*See* § 501.801 of this chapter on licensing procedures.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

###### Editorial Note on Part 360

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 360 appear at 79 FR 8860, Feb. 14, 2014.

#### § 360.7 Chain letters prohibited.

The issuance of bonds in the furtherance of a chain letter, pyramid, or similar scheme is against the public interest and is prohibited.
#### §§ 515.416-515.419 [Reserved]
Exhibit 32.2

                          PFO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Emclaire  Financial  Corp.  (the
Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date here (the Report), I, Shelly
L. Rhoades,  Principal  Financial  and  Accounting  Officer of the  Corporation,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(3)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(4)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,   the  financial  condition  and  result  of  operations  of  the
     Corporation.



/s/  Shelly L. Rhoades
----------------------

Shelly L. Rhoades
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer


May 14, 2004
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Assistant Secretary Kritenbrink’s Travel to the People’s Republic of China and New Zealand

# 									Assistant Secretary Kritenbrink’s Travel to the People’s Republic of China and New Zealand							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

June 3, 2023

Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Daniel J. Kritenbrink will travel to the People’s Republic of China and New Zealand from June 4–10.

In Beijing, Assistant Secretary Kritenbrink, joined by National Security Council Senior Director for China and Taiwan Affairs Sarah Beran, will discuss key issues in the bilateral relationship.

In Auckland, New Zealand, Assistant Secretary Kritenbrink will speak at the New Zealand Institute of International Affairs Conference. In Wellington, Assistant Secretary Kritenbrink will participate in the U.S.-New Zealand Strategic Dialogue to discuss issues affecting both countries like climate change, technology, economic and security cooperation, and our shared commitment to the Pacific.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsChinaClimate ChangeNew ZealandOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial International TravelPartnershipsSecurityTechnology

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
# Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs Releases

4513 items

        -    Report  		Liechtenstein	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		Denmark	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		Sweden	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		Latvia	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		Spain	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		Czech Republic	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		Slovenia	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		Kosovo	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		Italy	  April 20, 2018 
        -    Report  		Cyprus	  April 20, 2018 

previous page1…431432433434435…452next page

Back to Top
40007.

#### MOORE v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY.

Carlisle, Presiding Judge.

1. While a policy of insurance will be construed liberally in favor of the object to be accomplished, and its provisions will be strictly construed against the insurance company, and where it is susceptible of two constructions, that construction will be adopted most favorable to the insured, *Johnson v. Mutual Life Ins. Co.,*154 Ga. 653 (115 SE 14), *Penn Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Milton,*160 Ga. 168, 171 (127 SE 140, 40 ALR 1382), yet a contract of insurance should be so construed as to carry out the true intention of the parties, *Code*§ 20-702, and their rights are to be determined by its terms so far as they are lawful, and the language of the contract should be construed in its entirety, and should receive a reasonable construction and not be extended beyond what is fairly within its plain terms; and where the language fixing the extent of the liability of the insurer is unambiguous and but one reasonable construction is possible, the court must expound the contract as made. *New York Life Ins. Co. v. Thompson,*45 Ga. App. 638 (165 SE 847), and cits.; *Cato v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.,*164 Ga. 392, 398 (138 SE 787); *Wheeler v. Fidelity & Cas. Co.,*129 Ga. 237, 240 (58 SE 709).

2. Assuming, without deciding, that the son of a plaintiff was an insured, and as such covered under the terms of a policy insuring against bodily injuries by uninsured automobiles *61which stipulates that the insurer “will pay all sums which the insured shall be entitled to recover as damages from the owner or operator of an uninsured automobile because of bodily injury, sustained by the insured, caused by accident and arising out of the ownership, maintenance or use of such automobile,” and that, “all sums payable because of bodily injury, other than death, are payable to the insured, or if the insured is a minor, to his parent or guardian,” such policy does not constitute an agreement to pay damages to one “insured” for bodily injury to another “insured.” The fact that the one insured would, under ordinary rules of law, be entitled to bring a tort action against the owner or driver of the uninsured automobile to recover damages suffered by the one insured because of the bodily injury to the other insured, would not be sufficient to change the plain meaning of the terms of the policy.

Decided May 22, 1963

Rehearing denied June 19, 1963.

*Marson G. Dunaway, Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*Matthews, Maddox, Walton ■& Smith, John W. Maddox,*contra.

3. It follows that the trial court did not err in sustaining a general demurrer to a petition brought by a mother, an insured under the policy, against the insurer to recover damages for the loss of services of her minor son, alleged to be also an insured, who received bodily injuries in an automobile collision with an uninsured automobile. Whether other demurrers in the nature of general demurrers were properly sustained by the trial court is not necessary to decide.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bell and Hall, JJ., concur.*
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

JULY 30, 2009

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

 [DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 08-16046

 

D. C. Docket No. 07-02004 CV-WSD-1

BANKOLE O. OGUNBAMISE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

WELLSTAR COBB HOSPITAL,

2-South,

Defendant-Appellee.

_______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

_______________________

(July 30, 2009)

Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge, and BOWEN, District *

Judge.

Honorable Dudley H. Bowen, Jr., United States District Judge for the Southern District of *

Georgia, sitting by designation.
PER CURIAM:

Appellant Bankole Ogunbamise, pro se, appeals the district court’s grant of

summary judgment to Ogunbamise’s former employer, WellStar Health System,

Inc. (“WellStar”), in his age discrimination and retaliation suit, filed pursuant to

the Age Discrimination and Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 623(a)(1), (d)

(“ADEA”). 

We review a court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Cofield v.

Goldkist, Inc., 267 F.3d 1264, 1267 (11th Cir. 2001). 

After reviewing the record, reading the parties’ briefs, and having the

benefit of oral argument, we first conclude that the district court properly granted

summary judgment on Ogunbamise’s ADEA claim because Ogunbamise did not

establish that he was replaced by a younger individual or treated differently than a

similarly situated person.

As to Ogunbamise’s retaliation claim, we conclude from the record that the

district court properly found that Ogunbamise failed to present a prima facie case

of retaliation because he failed to show a causal connection between his protected

activity and the alleged adverse employment actions he suffered. Accordingly, we

affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of WellStar.

AFFIRMED.

2