alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- Office Home
- About Us
- Atrocity Crimes Advisory Group
- Rewards Program
- Regional Engagement
- Policy Paper Series
- Programs
- Remarks and Releases

HomeOffice of Global Criminal Justice...About Us – Office of Global Criminal Justice

# 									About Us							

Office of Global Criminal Justice

The Office of Global Criminal Justice (GCJ) – led by the Ambassador at Large for Global Criminal Justice – advises the Secretary of State and the Under Secretary of State for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights on issues related to war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide. In particular, the Office helps formulate U.S. policy on the prevention of, responses to, and accountability for mass atrocities. To this end, GCJ advises U.S. Government and foreign governments on the appropriate use of a wide range of transitional justice mechanisms, including truth and reconciliation commissions, lustrations, and reparations, in addition to judicial processes.

GCJ coordinates U.S. Government positions relating to the international and hybrid courts currently prosecuting persons responsible for genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity – not only for such crimes committed in the former Yugoslavia, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, and Cambodia – but also in the Central African Republic, Guatemala, and elsewhere in the world. The Office works closely with other governments, international institutions, and nongovernmental organizations to establish and assist international and domestic commissions of inquiry, fact-finding missions, and tribunals to investigate, document, and prosecute atrocities in every region of the globe. The Office coordinates the deployment of a range of diplomatic, legal, economic, military, and intelligence tools to help expose the truth, judge those responsible, protect and assist victims, enable reconciliation, deter atrocities, and build the rule of law.

GCJ provides advice and expertise on transitional justice, including ways to ensure justice and accountability for genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes, as well as other grave human rights violations. The Office supports U.S. diplomats operating in conflict and post-conflict scenarios by providing subject matter expertise regarding atrocity crimes. It is also the point of contact for international, hybrid, and mixed tribunals exercising jurisdiction over war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide committed around the world. The Office is also responsible for implementing the War Crimes Rewards Program that provides rewards to people who provide information leading to the capture and conviction of indicted war criminals. Finally, the Office participates in the Atrocity Early Warning Task Force, which coordinates U.S. government efforts to prevent, mitigate, and respond to atrocities.

Tags

AtrocitiesCriminal JusticeRewards for JusticeRule of Law

Back to Top
HomeBiographies...Shawn Powers

# 				Shawn Powers			

															Director for Strategic Planning and Communications						Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital Policy												

				August 15, 2022 -									Present							

Shawn Powers is the Director for Strategic Planning and Communications in the Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital Policy. Previously, he served at the U.S. Agency for Global Media’s (USAGM) Chief Strategy Officer. Powers has a Ph.D. from the Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism at the University of Southern California (USC), and from 2016-2018, he served as the Executive Director of the United States Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy at the State Department. Previously, Powers was a tenured professor at Georgia State University, where he established and led its Center for Global Information Studies, and is currently an adjunct professor-practitioner at Syracuse University.

Tags

Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital PolicyState Department Official

Back to Top
----

----

|   | (1) |   | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|-----|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) |   | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----
Exhibit 34.2 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Ernst & Young LLP) 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board of Directors 

U.S. Bank National Association 

We have examined management’s****assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment ofCompliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that U.S. Bank National Association (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the U.S.Bank Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities****Platform (the “Platform”), for which the Company provides trustee, securities administration, registrar and paying agent services, as of and for the year ended March 31, 2018, exceptfor****servicing criteria 1122 (d)(1)(i)-(v), 1122 (d)(2)(i), 1122 (d)(2)(iii), 1122 (d)(2)(v)-(vii), 1122 (d)(3)(i), and 1122 (d)(4)(i)-(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by them with respectto the servicing platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’scompliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination. 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established bythe American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with theapplicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise thePlatform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria.Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred eitherprior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that the evidencewe obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. 

Our examination does not provide a legal determination on theCompany’s compliance with the servicing criteria. 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementionedservicing criteria as of and for the year ended March 31, 2018, for the U.S. Bank Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Minneapolis,Minnesota 

May 31, 2018
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-02-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-02-1999
<CASH>                                           8,139
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  104,852
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,193
<INVENTORY>                                    125,080
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               262,771
<PP&E>                                         235,446
<DEPRECIATION>                                  48,741
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 760,622
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          116,647
<BONDS>                                        100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                     279,463
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   760,622
<SALES>                                        312,089
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               312,089
<CGS>                                          209,881
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  282,619
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,231
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,590
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,647
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,943
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,943
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .68


</TABLE>
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1276

To amend the Housing Act of 1949 to provide for private servicing of

rural housing loans made under section 502 of such Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 21, 1995

Mr. CONDIT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Banking and Financial Services

A BILL

To amend the Housing Act of 1949 to provide for private

servicing of rural housing loans made under section 502

of such Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rural Housing Loan

5 Servicing Privatization Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO TRANSFER SERVICING OF SEC7 TION 502 LOANS.

8 Section 502 of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C.

9 1473) is amended by adding at the end the following new

10 subsection:
2

•HR 1276 IH

1 ‘‘(i) TRANSFER OF LOAN SERVICING.—The Secretary

2 shall enter into contracts under section 510(k) providing

3 for the servicing of all loans made by the Secretary under

4 this section, to the extent entities qualified and experi5 enced in conducting loan servicing for residential mort6 gage loans are available and agree to enter into such con7 tracts.’’.

8 SEC. 3. ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS.

9 Section 510 of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C.

10 1480) is amended—

11 (1) in subsection (j), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the

12 end;

13 (2) by redesignating subsection (k) as sub14 section (l); and

15 (3) by inserting after subsection (j) the follow16 ing new subsection:

17 ‘‘(k) enter into contracts (having such provi18 sions as the Secretary considers appropriate) with

19 entities qualified and experienced in conducting loan

20 servicing for residential mortgage loans to conduct

21 the servicing for loans made by the Secretary under

22 this title, which shall provide for such entities to re23 ceive scheduled periodic payments from borrowers

24 pursuant to the terms of loans, including amounts

25 for any escrow accounts, and making payments of
3

•HR 1276 IH

1 principal and interest and such other payments with

2 respect to the amounts received from borrowers as

3 may be required pursuant to the terms of loans and

4 may provide for such entities to retain a fee for serv5 icing from loan payment amounts received; and’’.

Æ
HomeBureau of European and Eurasian Affairs...Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs  Releases

# Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs Releases

4504 items

        -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Moldovan President Maia Sandu Before Their Meeting	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 29, 2024Presidential BuildingChisinau, Moldova 
        -    Media Note  		Ninth Annual Nordic-Baltic + U.S. Cyber Consultation	  May 29, 2024 
        -    Remarks  		Penny Pritzker Special Representative Delivers Remarks to Council on Foreign Relations	  May 28, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Delegation Travels to WSIS+20 Forum and AI For Good Summit	  May 28, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Ambassador Fick’s Travel to Finland and Estonia	  May 28, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Azerbaijan National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 28, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		United States-Japan-Republic of Korea Trilateral Vice Foreign Minister-Level Dialogue	  May 27, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Georgia National Day 2024	  May 26, 2024 
        -    		Travel to Moldova and Czechia, May 28-31, 2024	   
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with German Foreign Minister Baerbock	  May 24, 2024 

previous page1…34567…451next page

Back to Top
#### Hesham EL-MOSALAMY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KERN MEDICAL CENTER, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 00-15061.

D.C. No. CV-99-05433-AWI.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 12, 2001.1

Decided Feb. 22, 2001.

*459Before LEAVY, THOMAS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

1

. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM2

Hesham El-Mosalamy appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment in favor of Kern Medical Center (“Kern”) in El-Mosalamy’s action alleging discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2000e-17, and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634. El-Mosalamy alleged that Kern denied his application for its medical residency training program on account of his race, national origin, religion, and age. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s summary judgment, *see Jesinger v. Nevada Fed. Credit Union,*24 F.3d 1127, 1130 (9th Cir.1994), and we affirm.

El-Mosalamy failed to demonstrate the existence of a genuine issue of material fact as to whether he was qualified for Kern’s residency program and whether Kern sought similarly qualified applicants. Due to El-Mosalamy’s lower-than-required test scores and Kern’s uncontroverted evidence that it did not seek similarly qualified candidates, on this record, the district court did not err by granting summary judgment. *See McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green,*411 U.S. 792, 802, 93 S.Ct. 1817, 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973) (explaining that to prevail on a Title VII claim of disparate treatment discrimination, the plaintiff must establish a prima facie case by showing, among other things, that he is qualified for the position sought and that the defendant sought other similarly qualified candidates); *see also Wallis v. J .R. Simplot Co.,*26 F.3d 885, 891 (9th Cir. 1994) (explaining similar test to establish an ADEA prima facie case).

*460Because El-Mosalamy failed to show that any additional discovery would have precluded summary judgment, the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying his request to permit further discovery. *See Qualls v. Blue Cross of Cal., Inc., 22*F.3d 839, 844 (9th Cir.1994) (finding abuse of discretion only where the movant (1) diligently pursued its previous discovery opportunities, and (2) shows how allowing additional discovery would have precluded summary judgment); *see also Terrell v. Brewer,*935 F.2d 1015, 1018 (9th Cir.1991) (“Denial of a Rule 56(f) application is proper where it is clear that the evidence sought is almost certainly nonexistent or is the object of pure speculation.”).

AFFIRMED.

2

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 00771**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket** **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  

### 00771\00771_CERTIFICATION STATEMENT.pdf Plant certification statement x 

### 00771\00771_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 00771\00771_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 00771\00771_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 00771\00771_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00771\00771_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00771\00771_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00771\00771_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00771\00771_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00771\Supporting Documentation\00771 Follow Up Questions.doc Draft Questions for Follow Up



### 00771\Supporting Documentation\00771_COVER LETTER FOR Kyger Creek.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 00771\Supporting Documentation\00771_Follow Up Email-1.pdf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response x 

### 00771\Supporting Documentation\00771_Follow Up Email-2.pdf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response x 

### 00771\Supporting Documentation\00771_Follow Up Question Responses.pdf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response x 

### 00771\Supporting Documentation\00771_KC ____ D2-3 EPRI Rprt 1020365.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 00771\Supporting Documentation\00771_KC 771 D-1 WB Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 00771\Supporting Documentation\00771_KC 771 D2-3 FGD WW Study Excerpt CBI.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 00771\Supporting Documentation\00771_KC 771 D2-3 FGD WW Study Sec 5 CBI.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 00771\Supporting Documentation\00771_KC 771 D2-3 FGD WW Study Tier 2 CBI.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 00771\Supporting Documentation\00771_KC Flow Diagram ICR WB - 2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 00771\Supporting Documentation\00771_KC Flow Diagram ICR WB -1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey



### 00771\Supporting Documentation\00771_Kyger Property Boundary Aerial Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 00771\Supporting Documentation\00771_WWTP Flow Diagram Kyger.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in theSteam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
#### § 544.901 Paperwork Reduction Act notice.

For approval by the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507) of information collections relating to recordkeeping and reporting requirements, licensing procedures (including those pursuant to statements of licensing policy), and other procedures, see § 501.901 of this chapter. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid control number assigned by OMB.
§ 536.503 Payments and transfers to blocked accounts in U.S. financial institutions. ( a ) Any payment of funds or transfer of credit or other financial or economic resources or assets into a blocked account in a U.S. financial institution is authorized, provided that a transfer from a blocked account pursuant to this authorization may only be made to another blocked account held in the same name on the books of the same U.S. financial institution.
( b ) This section does not authorize any transfer from a blocked account within the United States to an account held outside the United States.
Note to § 536.503 :
Please refer to § 501.603 of this chapter for mandatory reporting requirements regarding financial transfers.
[62 FR 9960, Mar. 5, 1997, as amended at 62 FR 45107, Aug. 25, 1997]
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

Editorial Note on Part 360
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 360 appear at 79 FR 8860, Feb. 14, 2014.

§ 360.22 Payment or reissue pursuant to divorce. ( a ) *Divorce.* ( 1 ) The Department of the Treasury will recognize a divorce decree that ratifies or confirms a property settlement agreement disposing of bonds or that otherwise settles the interests of the parties in a bond. Reissue of a savings bond may be made to eliminate the name of one spouse as owner, coowner, or beneficiary or to substitute the name of one spouse for that of the other spouse as owner, coowner, or beneficiary pursuant to the decree. However, if the bond is registered in the name of one spouse with another person as coowner, there must be submitted either: ( i ) A request for reissue by the other person; or
( ii ) a certified copy of a judgment, decree, or court order entered in proceedings to which the other person and the spouse named on the bond are parties, determining the extent of the interest of that spouse in the bond. Reissue will be permitted only to the extent of that spouse's interest.
( 2 ) The evidence required under § 360.23 must be submitted in every case. When the divorce decree does not set out the terms of the property settlement agreement, a certified copy of the agreement must be submitted. Payment, rather than reissue, will be made if requested.
( b ) *Date for determining rights.* When payment or reissue under this section is to be made, the rights of the parties will be those existing under the regulations current at the time of the entry of the final judgment, decree, or court order.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 306.36 Termination of interest.

Securities will cease to bear interest on the date of their maturity unless they have been called for redemption before maturity in accordance with their terms, or are presented and surrendered for redemption-exchange or exchange pursuant to an advance refunding or prerefunding offer, in which case they will cease to bear interest on the date of call, or the exchange date, as the case may be.
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 82

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 12 (legislative day, JULY 10), 1995

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Directing the Secretary of the Senate to make technical

corrections in the enrollment of S. 523.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill (S. 523)

3 to amend the Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Act

4 to authorize additional measures to carry out the control

5 of salinity upstream of Imperial Dam in a cost-effective

6 manner, and for other purposes, the Secretary of the Sen7 ate shall make the following corrections:
2

HCON 82 RDS

1 (1) In the last sentence of paragraph (1) of sec2 tion 1 of the bill (adding a new paragraph (6) to

3 section 202(a) of the Colorado River Basin Salinity

4 Control Act) insert a period after the words ‘‘sub5 mits such report’’.

6 (2) In paragraph (2)(B) of section 1 of the bill

7 (amending section 205(a)(4)(i) of the Colorado River

8 Basin Salinity Control Act) strike ‘‘section 202(a)(4)

9 and (5)’’ and insert ‘‘sections 202(a)(4) and (5)’’.

10 (3) At the end of paragraph (4) of section 1 of

11 the bill (amending section 202(b)(4) of the Colorado

12 River Basin Salinity Control Act) strike the period

13 before the closing quotation marks.

Passed the House of Representatives July 11, 1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.