alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Donald M. Earhart, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of I-Flow
Corporation;  2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;  3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;  4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;  b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and  c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and  b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: May 10, 2004 /s/ Donald M. EarhartDonald M. EarhartPresident, Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer 27
HomeBiographies...Helaina R. Matza

# 				Helaina R. Matza			

															Acting Special Coordinator						Office of the U.S. Special Coordinator for the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment												

				May 31, 2023 -									Present							

Tags

Office of the U.S. Special Coordinator for the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and InvestmentState Department Official

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Anti-Democratic Actions in Guatemala

# 									Anti-Democratic Actions in Guatemala							

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

October 1, 2023

The United States is gravely concerned with continued efforts to undermine Guatemala’s peaceful transition of power to President-elect Arévalo. Most recently, the Guatemalan Public Ministry seized electoral materials under the custody of the Supreme Electoral Tribunal (TSE). This act followed earlier attempts to strip immunity of the TSE electoral officials along with raiding their offices and storage facilities that house elections results. Such anti-democratic behavior undermines Guatemala’s democratic institutions and is inconsistent with the principles of the Inter-American Democratic Charter.

The United States stands with those seeking to safeguard democracy and rule of law in Guatemala. We are actively taking steps to impose visa restrictions on individuals who continue to undermine Guatemala’s democracy, including current and former members of Congress, judicial actors, and any others engaging in such behavior. These individuals will be ineligible for entry into the United States under Section 212(a)(3)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, which restricts visas for individuals believed to be responsible for, complicit in, or undermining democracy. The United States also supports the ongoing work of the OAS Special Mission to assist with the presidential transition, as called for by the OAS Permanent Council. The Guatemalan people have spoken. Their voice must be respected.

Tags

Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsDemocracyElectionsGuatemalaOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
§ 5.13 How will Treasury entities use administrative wage garnishment to collect a Treasury debt from a debtor's wages? ( a ) Treasury entities are authorized to collect debts from a debtor's wages by means of administrative wage garnishment in accordance with the requirements of 31 U.S.C. 3720D and 31 CFR 285.11. This part adopts and incorporates all of the provisions of 31 CFR 285.11 concerning administrative wage garnishment, including the hearing procedures described in 31 CFR 285.11(f). Treasury entities may use administrative wage garnishment to collect a delinquent Treasury debt unless the debtor is making timely payments under an agreement to pay the debt in installments (see § 5.6 of this part). At least thirty (30) days prior to initiating an administrative wage garnishment, Treasury entities will send notice to the debtor in accordance with the requirements of § 5.4 of this part, including the requirements of § 5.4(a)(10) of this part. For Treasury debts referred to the Financial Management Service under § 5.9 of this part, Treasury entities may authorize the Financial Management Service to send a notice informing the debtor that administrative wage garnishment will be initiated and how the debtor may request a hearing as described in § 5.4(a)(10) of this part. If a debtor makes a timely request for a hearing, administrative wage garnishment will not begin until a hearing is held and a decision is sent to the debtor. See 31 CFR 285.11(f)(4). If a debtor's hearing request is not timely, Treasury entities may suspend collection by administrative wage garnishment in accordance with the provisions of 31 CFR 285.11(f)(5). All travel expenses incurred by the debtor in connection with an in-person hearing will be borne by the debtor.
( b ) This section does not apply to Federal salary offset, the process by which Treasury entities collect debts from the salaries of Federal employees (see § 5.12 of this part).
HomeBiographies...Ellen Germain

# 				Ellen Germain			

															Special Envoy for Holocaust Issues						Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs												

				August 23, 2021 -									Present							

Ellen Germain assumed her duties as Special Envoy for Holocaust Issues on August 23, 2021.  She is a career member of the Senior Foreign Service.  Ms. Germain served as Deputy Chief of Mission at the U.S. Embassy in Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina from 2018-2021.  Her previous positions include director of the Office of Arabian Peninsula Affairs in the Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs (2015-2017), head of the U.S. Consulate General in Krakow, Poland (2012-2015), and postings as deputy political counselor at the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad (2007-2008) and at the U.S. Mission to the United Nations in New York (2008-2012) where she was responsible for issues relating to the Middle East, East Asia, and nonproliferation.

In Washington, DC, Ms. Germain has also held positions in the offices of Russian Affairs, Israel-Palestinian Affairs, and Maghreb Affairs.  Her other overseas tours were Tel Aviv, London, and Moscow.  She joined the Foreign Service in 1995.

Ms. Germain was born and raised in New York City. She graduated from Hunter College High School and holds a B.A. in English from Stanford University, an M.A. in English from Columbia University, and an MPhil in computer speech and language processing from Cambridge University.

Before joining the Foreign Service, Ms. Germain worked as a computer programmer and then as a science journalist.  She speaks Bosnian and Polish, has studied Russian, and thinks she still remembers some French and Hebrew.

Tags

Office of the Special Envoy for Holocaust IssuesState Department Official

Back to Top
SERVED : FEBRUAR Y 24 , 201 2 •'•rPARTMEMTO F ^•^^!SPORT/alO^ ! U.S
. DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N •)r,{-".<£ T QP^-FlMlOi^l

S " OFFIC E O FHEARING S ' " '" ^ WASHINGTON , D C ''yi ? ^E ^ ? U P 3 ' '-^

^
I N THE MATTERO F MARTINAIR E AVIATION , LL C •A A DOCICE

T NO
. [T O B E ASSIGNED ] (Civi l Penalty Action ) FDMSNO
. FAA-20iM29 5
AMENDF. D PROCEDURA LORDE R WMEREFORE , the parlie s b e an dar e hereb y ORDERE D to adher e to the followin g procedural schedule : 1
. Venu e i s Detroit , Ml. ; 2
. O n o r befor e Jun e I , 2012 , th e partie s shal l conclud e al l discovery including , but

not limite dto , depositions , documen t production , response s to productio n request s and/o r interrogatories
. I

f th e partie s canno t

resolv e adiscovery disput e they shal l submi t th e disput e to the undersigne dfo r resolutio n i

n atimel y manner : 3
. Th e partie s shal l b e prepare dt o presen t thi s cas e a

t ahearin g o

n o r afte r Jun e 1 , 201 2 , subjec t

to th e availability o f

courtroo mfacilities , 'fh e specifi c dal e andlime fo

r th e hearin g will b e forthcomin g i n aseparat e Order
. 4
. Th e remainder

o f our Procedural Orde r

shal l remai n i

n effect
.

U.S
. Administrativ e La

w Judg e Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis t

' 1 4 C.F.R
. § 13.22 1 slates : "Th

e administrativ

e la w Judg e shal l giv e eac h part y a t leas t 6 0 day s notic e o f ih e dale , tim e an dlocatio n o f th e hearing. "FDM S No
. FAA-2011-129 5 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC E US X OIUGINA L& ON E COP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Cleric , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2"W1000 ^ ON E COP Y Michae l L
. Dworkin , Respondent' s Counse l Michae l L
. Dworld n aai

dAssociate s 40 5 Californi aStreet , Suite 21 0 Sa n Francisco , C A 9410 4
. TEL : 415-421-250 0 FAX ; 415-421-256 0 Kat e Barber , Complaman t ' s Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regional Counse l Great Lake s Region , AGL-7 B Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 230 0 Eas t Devo n Avenu e DesPlaines,I L6001 8 TEL ; 847-294-786 2 FAX : 847-294-749 8 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC
. Goodwin , Administrativ e LOH ' Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 / ' U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 1200 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 ! Legal Assistan t FAX ; 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U,S
. Mail
. Fo

r servic e i n perso n o r b y expedile dcourier , as e th e followin g address : Federa

l Aviafioi J Administration

, 60 0 Independenc

e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu

r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington

, D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin

g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430
.
1

Aerial Inspection Resources,Inc.

4380 SW Macadam Ave.

Suite 515

Portland, OR 97239

Drew.p@aerialinspectionresources.com

U.S. Department of Transportation February 6, 2016

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave. S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Amendment to Aerial Inspection Resources, Inc. ExemptionNo. 11467

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0261

Dear Sir or Madam:

Aerial Inspection Resources, Inc. (AIR) is requesting an amendment to our FAA Exemption No. 

11467, Docket No. FAA-2015-0261 for the purpose of conducting commercial UAS operations. AIR 

wishes to add the DJI AGRAS MG-1.

For your ease in reviewing this request, please refer to the exhibit list which begins on page 2.

If we can provide any additional information to assist your understanding or review of this 

document, please do not hesitate to contact us at 503-312-9804 or via email at drew.p@air-uas.com. 

Thank you,

Drew Pairamore

Director of Regulatory Compliance

Aerial Inspection Resources,Inc.
2

Table of

Contents

Exhibits

Exhibit 1: DJI AGRAS MG-1Specifications.. ........Uploaded separately due to sizeconstraints
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 321.16 Report of erroneous payment.

If an agent discovers an erroneous payment of securities, it should immediately advise the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, Parkersburg, WV, as further described in the instructions and guidance issued pursuant to § 321.27.

[77 FR 16167, Mar. 20, 2012]
Faulk, Scott (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

kalena kaili-thomas <kalena.ana@icloud.com> 

Tuesday, November 26, 2013 9:13 PM 

To: EAS (OST) 

Subject: kaluapapa 

Dear Department Of Transportation, 

I am writing to support Mokulele Airline's 4 year bid to link Kalaupapa to Kahului, Honolulu and Ho'olehua. 

Mokulele is the best candidate as they have lower fares, experienced friendly agents, frequent flights, multiple 

islands 

and ease of booking via Global Distribution System (Expedia, Travelocity, Orbitz, Priceline etc.) It is important 

we have 

safe, stable & affordable service to Kalaupapa. 

Thank you, Kalena Kaili-Thomas 

0 ---·---.. --·-------·-----

1
#### § 542.534 Transactions involving persons subject to certain sanctions pursuant to this part.

Any transaction prohibited pursuant to § 542.212 due to the involvement of a person determined to be subject to the prohibitions of § 542.212 is authorized to the same extent such transaction would be authorized for a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 542.201 by a general license set forth in or issued pursuant to this part.

[89 FR 48322, June 6, 2024]
§ 23.42 Complaints. ( a ) Any person, individually or as a member of a class or on behalf of others, may file a complaint with Treasury, alleging discrimination prohibited by the Act or these regulations based on an action occurring on or after July 1, 1979. A complainant shall file a complaint within 180 days from the date the complainant first had knowledge of the alleged act of discrimination. However, for good cause shown, Treasury may extend this time limit.
( b ) Treasury will consider the date a complaint is filed to be the date upon which the complaint is sufficient to be processed.
( c ) Treasury will attempt to facilitate the filing of complaints wherever possible, including taking the following measures: ( 1 ) Accepting as a sufficient complaint any written statement that identifies the parties involved and the date the complainant first had knowledge of the alleged violation, describes generally the action or practice complained of, and is signed by the complainant.
( 2 ) Freely permitting a complainant to add information to the complaint to meet the requirements of a sufficient complaint.
( 3 ) Notifying the complainant and the recipient of their rights and obligations under the complaint procedure, including the right to have a representative at all stages of the complaint resolution process.
( 4 ) Notifying the complainant and the recipient (or their representatives) of their right to contact Treasury for information and assistance regarding the complaint resolution process.
( d ) Treasury will notify the complainant when the complaint falls outside the jurisdiction of these regulations, and will state the reason(s) why it is outside the jurisdiction of these regulations.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 315.27 Application for relief—nonreceipt of bond.

If a bond issued on any transaction is not received, the issuing agent must be notified as promptly as possible and given all information available about the nonreceipt. An appropriate form and instructions will be provided. If the application is approved, relief will be granted by the issuance of a bond bearing the same issue date as the bond that was not received.
§ 50.23 Applicability of State law requirements. ( a ) *General.* After satisfying the requirement to make available coverage for insured losses that does not differ materially from the terms, amounts, and other coverage limitations applicable to losses arising from events other than acts of terrorism, if coverage is rejected an insurer may then offer coverage that is on different terms, amounts, or coverage limitations, as long as such an offer does not violate any applicable state law requirements.
( b ) *Examples.* ( 1 ) If an insurer subject to state regulation first makes available coverage in accordance with § 50.20 and the state has a requirement that an insurer offer full coverage without any exclusion, then the requirement would continue to apply and the insurer may not subsequently offer less than full coverage or coverage with exclusions.
( 2 ) If an insurer subject to state regulation first makes available coverage in accordance with § 50.20 and the state permits certain exclusions or allows for other limitations, or an insurance policy is not governed by state law requirements, then the insurer may subsequently offer limited coverage or coverage with exclusions.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2606 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2606

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            November 18 (legislative day, November 16), 1995

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To prohibit the use of funds appropriated to the Department of Defense 
from being used for the deployment on the ground of United States Armed 
    Forces in the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina as part of any 
peacekeeping operation, or as part of any implementation force, unless 
    funds for such deployment are specifically appropriated by law.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF USE ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FUNDS FOR 
              DEPLOYMENT ON THE GROUND OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES IN 
              THE REPUBLIC OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA AS PART OF ANY 
              PEACEKEEPING OPERATION OR IMPLEMENTATION FORCE.

    None of the funds appropriated or otherwise available to the 
Department of Defense may be obligated or expended for the deployment 
on the ground of United States Armed Forces in the Republic of Bosnia 
and Herzegovina as part of any peacekeeping operation, or as part of 
any implementation force, unless funds for such deployment have been 
specifically appropriated by a law enacted after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 17, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
40151.

#### HOWES v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK & TRUST COMPANY IN MACON et al.

Decided June 18, 1963.

Russell, Judge.

Where a bill of exceptions is tendered to the trial judge and by him returned to the plaintiff in error for the purpose of correction under *Code Ann.*§ 6-909, the longest period the plaintiff in error has for this purpose, in the absence of providential cause or imperative necessity appearing from the certificate of the judge, is 30 days. *Phillips v. Taylor,*214 Ga. 221 (104 SE2d 96). In this case a motion to dismiss has been made on the ground that after the bill of exceptions was tendered to the trial judge on October 18, 1962, and after various conferences between the parties as to the contents of the record and a hearing before the trial court as to possible changes, which hearing was held on January 3, 1963, and resulted in agreement as to the contents of the record, the bill of exceptions was not thereafter retendered and certified until March 22, 1963, a period of 78 days after final agreement between the judge and the attorneys, and a period of 155 days from the first tender. Assuming that the time consumed prior to January 3 is properly accounted for, there appears no reason why the bill of exceptions should not have been retendered within a 30 day period thereafter. Under the rule stated in *Phillips v. Taylor,*214 Ga. 221,.supra, the delay has caused this court to lose jurisdiction, and the writ of error must be

*Dismissed.*

*Felton, C. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.*

*50*John Iiendrix Crutchfield, Hugh A. Wells,*for plaintiff in error.

*Jones, Sparks, Benton & Cork, Frank C. Jones,*contra.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Birch Branch, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Earnest Mathis,
Jr., Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date:    February 9, 2009
                                          /s/ Earnest Mathis, Jr.
                                          -----------------------
                                          Earnest Mathis, Jr.
                                          Chief Executive Officer and Director


<PAGE>
§ 535.329 Person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. The term *person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States* includes: ( a ) Any person wheresoever located who is a citizen or resident of the United States;
( b ) Any person actually within the United States;
( c ) Any corporation organized under the laws of the United States or of any state, territory, possession, or district of the United States; and
( d ) Any partnership, association, corporation, or other organization wheresoever organized or doing business which is owned or controlled by persons specified in paragraph (a), (b), or (c) of this section.