### 32536 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 109 / Tuesday, June 8, 2010 / Notices

Environmental Analysis (SEA) in its independent investigation) cannot be made before the exemption’s effective date. See Exemption of Outof-Service Rail Lines, 5 I.C.C.2d 377 (1989). Any request for a stay should be filed as soon as possible so that the Board may take appropriate action before the exemption’s effective date.

3 Each OFA must be accompanied by the filing fee, which is currently set at $1,500. See 49 CFR 1002.2(f)(25). 1 Foreign Tire Sales, Inc. is an importer of replacement motor vehicle equipment, incorporated under the laws of the State of New Jersey, with offices at 2204 Morris Avenue, Suite L–5, Union, New Jersey. formal expressions of intent to file an OFA under 49 CFR 11152.27(c)(2), 3 and trail use/rail banking requests under 49 CFR 1152.29 must be filed by June 18, 2010. Petitions to reopen or requests for public use conditions under 49 CFR 1152.28 must be filed by June 28, 2010, with the Surface Transportation Board, 395 E Street, SW., Washington, DC
20423–0001.

A copy of any petition filed with the Board should be sent to EJ&E’s representative: Thomas J. Healey, 17641 S. Ashland Avenue, Homewood, IL
60430.

If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, the exemption is void ab initio.

EJ&E has filed a combined environmental and historic report which addresses the effects, if any, of the abandonment on the environment and historic resources. SEA will issue an environmental assessment (EA) by June 11, 2010. Interested persons may obtain a copy of the EA by writing to SEA (Room 1100, Surface Transportation Board, Washington, DC 20423–0001) or by calling SEA, at (202) 245–0305. [Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339.] Comments on environmental and historic preservation matters must be filed within 15 days after the EA becomes available to the public.

Environmental, historic preservation, public use, or trail use/rail banking conditions will be imposed, where appropriate, in a subsequent decision.

Pursuant to the provisions of 49 CFR 1152.29(e)(2), EJ&E shall file a notice of consummation with the Board to signify that it has exercised the authority granted and fully abandoned the line. If consummation has not been effected by EJ&E’s filing of a notice of consummation by June 8, 2011, and there are no legal or regulatory barriers to consummation, the authority to abandon will automatically expire.

Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at ‘‘ http:// www.stb.dot.gov. ’’

Decided: June 2, 2010. By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of Proceedings. Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2010–13761 Filed 6–7–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4915–01–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**Executive Committee of the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee;**  **Meeting; Correction**

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

**ACTION :**  Notice of meeting; correction.

**SUMMARY :**  On June 3, 2010, the FAA published a notice of a meeting of the Executive Committee of the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee. The notice contained an inaccurate date in one section. This notice corrects that

error.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Gerri Robinson, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591, telephone (202) 267–9678; fax (202) 267–5057; e-mail Gerri.Robinson@faa.gov

.
**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  In FR Doc. 2010–13326, published June 3, 2010, (75 FR 31509) make the following correction:

On page 31509, in the second column, under the heading **SUPPLEMENTARY**
**INFORMATION** , revise the date ‘‘ December 9, 2009 ’’ to read ‘‘June 16, 2010. ’’

Issued in Washington, DC, on June 3, 2010. Pamela A. Hamilton-Powell, Executive Director, Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2010–13762 Filed 6–7–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**National Highway Traffic Safety Administration** 

**[Docket No. NHTSA–2010–0063; Notice 1]**

**Foreign Tire Sales, Inc., Receipt of Petition for Decision of**  **Inconsequential Noncompliance**

Foreign Tire Sales, Inc. (FTS) 1 , as importer of record for ProMeter brand medium truck radial replacement tires manufactured by Shandlong Linglong Rubber Company Limited has determined that certain replacement tires manufactured during the period between the 15th week of 2008 and 22nd week of 2009 do not fully comply with paragraph S6.5(d) of 49 CFR 571.119 Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 119, New Pneumatic Tires for Motor Vehicles With a GVWR of More than 4,536 Kilograms (10,000 pounds) and Motorcycles. FTS has filed an appropriate report pursuant to 49 CFR part 573, Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility and Reports.

Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) ( see implementing rule at 49 CFR part 556), FTS has petitioned for an exemption from the notification and remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the basis that this noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety.

This notice of receipt of FTS’s petition is published under 49 U.S.C. 30118 and 30120 and does not represent any agency decision or other exercise of judgment concerning the merits of the petition.

Affected are approximately 2,659 size 285/75R–24.5 14 ply (steer and drive) and 295/75R–22.5 14 ply (steer and drive) ProMeter brand medium truck radial tires manufactured during the period between the 15th week of 2008 and 22nd week of 2009 with DOT Numbers: 285/75R–24.5— OU4CFTS1508–0U4CFT2209 and

295/75R–22.5—OU34FTS1508– 0U34FTS2209. FTS stated that it believed that 100% of the 2,659 tiresinvolved contained the identified noncompliance.

FTS sold these tires to eleven customers who are distributors. Three of the eleven distributors have not sold any tires to their customers.

In a supplemental letter dated April 14, 2010, FTS submitted corrections of typographical errors in its petition and stated that subsequent to submitting its petition it had decided to remedy all of the subject tires that it held in its possession as well as those that had not been sold by its customers (tire distributers). FTS also revised its estimate of the number of affected tires that had been sold and not retrieved for remedy as 2000. Therefore, it is only those 2000 tires for which FTS is requesting exemption because it claims that the remaining 659 tires have been remedied.

Paragraph S6.5(d) of 49 CFR 571.119 (FMVSS 119) requires in pertinent part:

S6.5 Tire markings. Except as specified in this paragraph, each tire shall be marked on