alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
40451.

#### CASH v. THE STATE.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

The defendant was convicted of receiving and being in possession of stolen property under an indictment charging him with cattle stealing. The defendant filed a motion for new trial on the usual general grounds as well as a motion in arrest of judgment. On the hearing of such-motions the following judgments were rendered: “After *657careful consideration the within motion for a new trial made by and on behalf of William B. Cash, is hereby sustained and a new trial is hereby granted. Done at chambers at Claxton, Georgia, on this the 29th day of December, 1962.” “After careful consideration and a new trial having been granted in this case, it is the judgment of this court that this defendant’s motion in arrest of judgment be, and it is, hereby overruled and denied. Done at chambers at Claxton, Georgia on this 29th day of December, 1962.” Error is assigned on the judgment overruling the motion seeking to arrest the judgment. *Held:*

Decided November 14, 1963.

*John W. Underwood, J. T. Grice,*for plaintiff in error.

1. “Where a verdict in a criminal case finds the accused guilty of a crime not made in the indictment a motion in arrest of judgment will lie. *Spence v. State,*7 Ga. App. 825, 826 (68 SE2d 443).” *Waller v. State,*107 Ga. App. 609 (1) (131 SE2d 111). The indictment was in one count only and charged only cattle stealing. It did not charge the defendant with the offense of receiving stolen goods, and the verdict finding the defendant guilty of receiving stolen goods amounted to an acquittal of the offense actually charged.

2. “Where a verdict in a criminal case is in legal effect an acquittal, the accused cannot be again tried for the same offense, even though a new trial be granted upon his own motion.” *Ezzard v. State,*11 Ga. App. 30 (2) (74 SE 551). Such case distinguished cases exemplified by *Williams v. State,*121 Ga. 579 (49 SE 689).

3. The verdict in this case amounted to an acquittal of the crime charged; the verdict finding the defendant guilty of another crime not included in the indictment being void, the judgment of the trial court overruling his motion in arrest of judgment must be reversed.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Frankum and Jordan, JJ., concur.*
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2650 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2650

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 5, 1996

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to eliminate certain sentencing 
                     inequities for drug offenders.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Mandatory Federal Prison Drug 
Treatment Act of 1996''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF SENTENCING INEQUITIES FOR DRUG OFFENDERS.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (B) of section 3621(e)(2) of title 
18, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
                    ``(B) Administration of treatment programs.--The 
                Attorney General shall ensure through the use of all 
                appropriate and available incentives and sanctions that 
                eligible prisoners undergo a program of substance abuse 
                treatment.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--The heading for paragraph (2) of section 
3621(e) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking 
``Incentive for prisoners' successful completion of treatment program'' 
and inserting ``Treatment requirement''.
    (c) Eligibility.--Clause (ii) of section 3621(e)(5)(B) of title 18, 
United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
                            ``(ii) within 24 months of the date of 
                        release, or is otherwise designated by the 
                        Bureau of Prisons for participation in a 
                        residential substance abuse treatment program; 
                        and''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 4, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### § 544.411 Entities owned by one or more persons whose property and interests in property are blocked.

Persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 544.201 have an interest in all property and interests in property of an entity in which such persons directly or indirectly own, whether individually or in the aggregate, a 50 percent or greater interest. The property and interests in property of such an entity, therefore, are blocked, and such an entity is a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 544.201, regardless of whether the name of the entity is incorporated into OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List).

[87 FR 78473, Dec. 21, 2022]
§ 31.214 Limitations on concurrent activities. Treasury has determined that certain market activities by a retained entity during the arrangement are likely to cause impermissible conflicts of interest. Accordingly, the following restrictions shall apply unless waived pursuant to section 31.215, or Treasury agrees in writing to specific mitigation measures. ( a ) If the retained entity assists Treasury in the acquisition, valuation, management, or disposition of specific troubled assets, the retained entity and key individuals shall not purchase or offer to purchase such assets from Treasury, or assist anyone else in purchasing or offering to purchase such troubled assets from the Treasury, during the term of its arrangement.
( b ) If the retained entity advises Treasury with respect to a program for the purchase of troubled assets, the retained entity and key individuals shall not, during the term of the arrangement, sell or offer to sell, or act on behalf of anyone with respect to a sale or offer to sell, any asset to Treasury under the terms of that program.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998             JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          13,729                  13,729
<SECURITIES>                                    35,379                  35,379
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,231                  14,231
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,572                  67,572
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,138                   6,138
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  94,615                  94,615
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,994                  49,994
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           161                     161
<OTHER-SE>                                      42,765                  42,765
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    94,615                  94,615
<SALES>                                         19,522                  38,040
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,522                  38,040
<CGS>                                            7,751                  15,026
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,818                  48,692
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,427)                 (8,992)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       266                     846
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,693)                 (9,838)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,693)                 (9,838)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.34)                  (0.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.34)                  (0.59)
        


</TABLE>
The Honorable Joseph E. Stevens, Jr., United States District 1

Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

___________

No. 95-3324

___________

Pamela S. Freitag, *

 *

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

 * District Court for the

v. * Western District of Missouri.

 *

ELI, also known as Employer * [UNPUBLISHED]

Advantage; Wilson, Turner, Gavin,*

Inc., *

 *

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: July 1, 1996

 Filed: August 9, 1996

___________

Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Pamela Freitag brought an employment discrimination action against

ELI, also known as Employer Advantage, and Wilson, Turner, Gavin, Inc.

("WTG"). Defendants filed a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction, supported by affidavits, arguing that neither ELI nor WTG was

an "employer" within the meaning of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(b).

Freitag responded and submitted exhibits for the district court's1

evaluation. After considering the parties' submissions, the district court

granted defendants' motion. Freitag appeals.
-2-

After carefully reviewing the record and the parties' briefs, we

conclude the district court's judgment was correct. Contrary to Freitag's

argument on appeal, the district court properly considered materials

outside the pleadings without treating defendants' motion as one for

summary judgment, and could undertake its jurisdictional inquiry without

conducting a formal evidentiary hearing or forewarning the parties. See

Osborn v. United States, 918 F.2d 724, 729-30 (8th Cir. 1990).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Amendment to Planar Systems, Inc. 2009 Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.1 
 Amendment to 2009 Incentive Plan 
 Section 4.1 of the Planar Systems,
Inc. 2009 Incentive Plan is amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 
  

	 	4.1	Authorized Number of Shares 

 Subject to adjustment from time to time as provided in Section 15.1, the number of shares of Common Stock available for issuance under the Plan shall be: 

(a) 1,300,000 3,000,000 shares; plus 

(b) any shares subject to outstanding awards under the Company’s Amended and Restated 1993 Stock Incentive Plan for
Nonemployee Directors, Clarity Visual Systems, Inc. 1995 Stock Incentive Plan, Clarity Visual Systems, Inc. Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, 1996 Stock Incentive Plan, 1999 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan or 2007 New Hire Incentive Plan, or any
individual incentive award, (together, the “Prior Plans” ) on the Effective Date and any shares subject to outstanding awards under the Prior Plans on the Effective Date that cease to be subject to such awards (other than by reason
of exercise or settlement of the awards to the extent they are exercised for or settled in shares), subject to adjustment from time to time as provided in Section 15.1, which shares shall cease, as of such date, to be available for grant and
issuance under the Prior Plans, but shall be available for issuance under the Plan. 
 Shares issued under the Plan shall be
drawn from authorized and unissued shares.
HomeBiographies...David Mandel-Anthony

# 				David Mandel-Anthony			

															Deputy to the Ambassador-at-Large for Global Criminal Justice						Office of Global Criminal Justice												

				January 1, 2023 -									Present							

David Mandel-Anthony serves as the Deputy to the Ambassador-at-Large for Global Criminal Justice in the Office of Global Criminal Justice (GCJ) at the U.S. Department of State.  He provides expert policy advice to the Ambassador-at-Large and senior Department leadership. Previously, he served as Acting Director and Senior Advisor in GCJ, where he led and oversaw portfolios to advance U.S. foreign policy on transitional justice, international and hybrid courts, atrocity prevention, and international humanitarian and human rights law. In GCJ, he has also directed portfolios related to Africa, Central America, Near Eastern Affairs, and Ukraine. He has more than 15 years experience working on foreign policy, human rights, and transitional justice at  leading non-governmental organizations, the U.S. Congress, and international courts and institutions. He also taught transitional justice as an Adjunct Professor at Georgetown University Law Center. He has published on emerging trends related to accountability for atrocity crimes and is a frequent public speaker.  He holds a JD from Fordham University and a BA in Plan II from the University of Texas at Austin.

Tags

Office of Global Criminal JusticeState Department Official

Back to Top
Exhibit 99.1

            CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT


      I, Thomas O. Ryder, of The Reader's Digest Association,
Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(1)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
      ended March 31, 2003 (the "Periodic Report") which this
      statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and

(2)   information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of The Reader's Digest
      Association, Inc.

This certificate is being furnished solely for purposes of
Section 906 and is not being filed as part of the Periodic Report.


Dated:  May 5, 2003




                                        /s/ THOMAS O. RYDER
                                           Thomas O. Ryder
                                       Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to The Reader's Digest Association, Inc.
and will be retained by The Reader's Digest Association, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 160 (Thursday, August 20, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42067-42068]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19925]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL09-67-000]


City of Pasadena, CA; Notice of Filing

August 13, 2009.
    Take notice that on August 7, 2009, the City of Pasadena, 
California (Pasadena), filed a Petition for Declaratory Order, 
requesting the Commission to issue an Order to approve its revised Base 
Transmission Revenue Requirement and its High Voltage Transmission 
Revenue Requirement, to become effective October 1, 2009, pursuant to 
Rules 205 and 207 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 
18 CFR 385.205 and 385.207, and Sec.  26.1.1 of the California 
Independent System Operator Corporation Tariff.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the

[[Page 42068]]

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0f494a5d4c40616366616a5c7a7f7f607d7b4f696a7d6c21686079"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="561013041519383a3f383305232626392422163033243578313920">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on September 8, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-19925 Filed 8-19-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 548.300 Applicability of definitions.

The definitions in this subpart apply throughout the entire part.
#### Michael Shane DIGGS *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 97-1566

958 S.W.2d 303

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered February 5, 1998

*John F. Gibson, Jr.,*for appellant.

No response.

*357Per Curiam.

Appellant Michael Shane Diggs, by his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.

On May 29, 1997, the Drew County Circuit Court entered a judgment convicting appellant of burglary and theft of property. On May 30, 1997, appellant filed a motion for new trial. Appellant’s notice of appeal from the judgment of conviction was filed on June 25, 1997. Appellant’s attorney failed to file a notice of appeal after the motion for new trial was deemed denied on June 30, 1997.

Although the notice of appeal from the judgment of conviction was filed in a timely manner, appellant’s attorney, John F. Gibson, Jr., admits that a notice of appeal from the denial of appellant’s motion for new trial was not filed in a timely manner due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion, which we will treat as a motion for belated appeal. *See Terry v. State,*272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981); *In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases,*265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion for belated appeal is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 359.16 When does interest accrue on Series I savings bonds? ( a ) Interest, if any, accrues on the first day of each month; that is, we add the interest earned on a bond during any given month to its value at the beginning of the following month.
( b ) The accrued interest compounds semiannually.
#### § 510.316 Loans or other extensions of credit.

The term *loans or other extensions of credit* means any transfer or extension of funds or credit on the basis of an obligation to repay, or any assumption or guarantee of the obligation of another to repay an extension of funds or credit, including: Overdrafts; currency swaps; purchases of securities or debt securities, including securities from or issued by the Government of North Korea; purchases of a loan made by another person; sales of financial assets subject to an agreement to repurchase; renewals or refinancings whereby funds or credits are transferred or extended to a prohibited borrower or prohibited recipient; the issuance of standby letters of credit; and drawdowns on existing lines of credit.
#### § 525.303 Entity.

The term *entity* means a partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization.
§ 552.301 Blocked account; blocked property. The terms *blocked account* and *blocked property* shall mean any account or property subject to the prohibitions in § 552.201 held in the name of a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 552.201, or in which such person has an interest, and with respect to which payments, transfers, exportations, withdrawals, or other dealings may not be made or effected except pursuant to a license or other authorization from OFAC expressly authorizing such action. Note 1 to § 552.301 .
*See* § 552.411 concerning the blocked status of property and interests in property of an entity that is directly or indirectly owned, whether individually or in the aggregate, 50 percent or more by one or more persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 552.201.
#### § 510.328 U.S. financial institution.

The term *U.S. financial institution* means any U.S. entity (including its foreign branches) that is engaged in the business of accepting deposits, making, granting, transferring, holding, or brokering loans or other extensions of credit, or purchasing or selling foreign exchange, securities, commodity futures or options, or procuring purchasers and sellers thereof, as principal or agent. It includes depository institutions, banks, savings banks, trust companies, securities brokers and dealers, commodity futures and options brokers and dealers, forward contract and foreign exchange merchants, securities and commodities exchanges, clearing corporations, investment companies, employee benefit plans, and U.S. holding companies, U.S. affiliates, or U.S. subsidiaries of any of the foregoing. This term includes those branches, offices, and agencies of foreign financial institutions that are located in the United States, but not such institutions' foreign branches, offices, or agencies.
www.gpo.gov

### §154. Proceeds of sales of lands not subject to certain deductions

No part of the expenses of the public lands service shall be deducted from the proceeds of Indian lands sold through the Bureau of Land Management, except as authorized by the treaty or agreement providing for the disposition of the lands.

(July 4, 1884, ch. 180, §10, 23 Stat. 98; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §403, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7876, 60 Stat. 1100.)

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

“Bureau of Land Management” substituted in text for “General Land Office” pursuant to section 403 of Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1946, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, which established the Bureau and transferred thereto the functions of the General Land Office.