alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeBiographies...Marc Shaw

# 				Marc Shaw			

															Deputy Assistant Secretary for Regional Security Affairs						Bureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and Stability												

				January 26, 2022 -									Present							

Marc Shaw joined the Bureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and Stability as Deputy Assistant Secretary in 2022, after serving as Deputy Executive Secretary in the Department’s Executive Secretariat.  During his more than 20 years in the Foreign Service, Marc also has served in leadership positions as Director of the International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs Section at the U.S. Embassy in Kabul, Afghanistan; Deputy Chief of Mission at the U.S. Embassy in Banjul, The Gambia; and as Counselor for Political Affairs at the U.S. Embassy in Caracas, Venezuela.  Earlier in his career, Marc completed tours in Pakistan, Burma, Iraq, Japan, and Honduras.  Marc holds an M.A. in International Economics and International Relations from the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies and a B.A. in Economics from Emory University.

Tags

Bureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and StabilityState Department Official

Back to Top
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 255 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 354
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 255

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 6, 1995

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

                             March 28, 1996

               Reported by Mr. Chafee, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To designate the Federal Justice Building in Miami, Florida, as the 
           ``James Lawrence King Federal Justice Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal Justice Building located at 99 Northeast Fourth Street 
in Miami, Florida, shall be known and designated as the ``James 
Lawrence King Federal Justice Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``James Lawrence 
King Federal Justice Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 5, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.

                              By Linda Nave,

                                                          Deputy Clerk.
                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 354

104th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 255

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To designate the Federal Justice Building in Miami, Florida, as the 
           ``James Lawrence King Federal Justice Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 28, 1996

                       Reported without amendment
```
www.gpo.gov

### §4211. 50-year leasehold interest in trust or restricted lands for housing purposes

#### (a) Authority to lease

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any trust or restricted Indian lands, whether tribally or individually owned, may be leased by the Indian owners, subject to the approval of the affected Indian tribe and the Secretary of the Interior, for housing development and residential purposes.

#### (b) Term

Each lease pursuant to subsection (a) of this section shall be for a term not exceeding 50 years.

#### (c) Rule of construction

This section may not be construed to repeal, limit, or affect any authority to lease any trust or restricted Indian lands that—

(1) is conferred by or pursuant to any other provision of law; or

(2) provides for leases for any period exceeding 50 years.

#### (d) Self-implementation

This section is intended to be self-implementing and shall not require the issuance of any rule, regulation, or order to take effect as provided in section 705.

(Pub. L. 104–330, title VII, §702, Oct. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 4050.)

#### References in Text

Section 705, referred to in subsec. (d), is section 705 of Pub. L. 104–330, which is set out as an Effective Date note below.

#### Effective Date

Section 705 of title VII of Pub. L. 104–330 provided that: “This title [enacting this subchapter and amending sections 1715z–13a and 1721 of Title 12, Banks and Banking, and sections 11902 to 11905 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare] and the amendments made by this title (but not including the amendments made by section 704 [amending sections 11902 to 11905 of Title 42]) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 26, 1996].”
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2578 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2578

To clarify the provision of section 3626(b) of title 39, United States 
         Code, defining an ``institution of higher education''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 2, 1995

 Mr. Moakley introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To clarify the provision of section 3626(b) of title 39, United States 
         Code, defining an ``institution of higher education''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT.

    Paragraph (3) of section 3626(b) of title 39, United States Code, 
is amended by striking the period and inserting ``, and includes a 
nonprofit organization that coordinates a network of college-level 
courses that is sponsored primarily by nonprofit educational 
institutions for an older adult constituency.''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit
      32.2**





Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
      Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the


Sarbanes
      - Oxley Act of 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of PLM Equipment Growth Fund V (the
“Partnership”), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner and of the
      Partnership, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:





(1)  the
      Report of the Partnership filed today fully complies with the requirements
      of
      Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.














/s/
      Richard K Brock


Richard
      K
      Brock


Chief
      Financial Officer of PLM Financial Services, Inc.


(Principal
      Financial Officer)


May
      11,
      2006
```

[Federal Register: September 22, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 183)]
[Notices]               
[Page 57829-57830]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr22se10-124]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0831]

 
Airport Improvement Program (AIP): Policy Regarding Access to 
Airports From Residential Property

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).

ACTION: Notice of proposed policy; notice of proposed amendment to 
sponsor grant assurance 5; and request for public comment; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is correcting an inadvertent omission in the Privacy 
paragraph in the Notice of Proposed Policy Regarding Access to Airports 
From Residential Property that was published in the Federal Register on 
September 9, 2010 (75 FR 54946).

DATES: Effective September 22, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randall S. Fiertz, telephone: (202) 
267-3085; facsimile: (202) 267-5257; e-mail: randall.fiertz@faa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Need for Correction

    On September 9, 2010, the Federal Aviation Administration published 
a Notice of Proposed Policy in the Federal Register at 75 FR 54946 
proposing to amend and clarify FAA policy concerning through-the-fence 
access to a Federally obligated airport from an adjacent or nearby 
property, when that property is used as a residence and permits 
continuation of existing access subject to certain standards. The 
Notice also proposed to amend sponsor grant assurance 5, Preserving 
Rights and Powers, to prohibit new residential through-the-fence 
access. In that Notice, there was an inadvertent omission. Through this 
amendment, FAA is correcting the inadvertent omission. In the Privacy 
section, FAA inadvertently omitted information relative to the DOT's 
Privacy Act Statement.

Correction

    In the Notice published on September 9, 2010 (75 FR 54946) FR Doc. 
2010-22095, on page 54947 in column 1,under the heading SUPPLEMENTARY 
INFORMATION section of this document, remove the first paragraph and in 
its place add the following paragraph to read as follows:

    Privacy: We will post all comments we receive, without change, 
to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information 
you provide. Using the search function of our docket Web site, 
anyone can find and read the comments received into any of our 
dockets, including the name of the

[[Page 57830]]

individual sending the comment (or signing the comment for an 
association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's 
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on 
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 17, 2010.
Randall Fiertz,
Director, Airport Compliance and Field Operations.
[FR Doc. 2010-23728 Filed 9-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a meeting of the State Advisory Committee Chairs of the Southern Region of the Commission will convene on Wednesday, September 9, 2009 at 1 p.m. and adjourn at approximately 7 p.m. at Atlanta Marriott Marquis, 265 Peachtree Center Ave., Atlanta, Georgia. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss a region wide fact-finding activity for 2010.

                    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The comments must be received in the regional office by October 9, 2009. The address is U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 61 Forsyth St., SW., Suite 18T40, Atlanta, GA 30303. Persons wishing to e-mail their comments, or to present their comments verbally at the meeting, or who desire additional information should contact Peter Minarik, Regional Director, Southern Regional Office, at (404) 562-7000 or 800-877-8339 for individuals who are deaf, hearing impaired, and/or have speech disabilities or by e-mail to                     *pminarik@usccr.gov.*

Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.

                    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced at the Southern Regional Office, as they become available, both before and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site,                     *http://www.usccr.gov,*                     or to contact the Southern Regional Office at the above e-mail or street address.                

The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

Dated in Washington, DC, August 19, 2009.

Peter Minarik,

Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.

[FR Doc. E9-20361 Filed 8-24-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 8, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41670 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee
v. MARCO TULIO MENDOZA-GOMEZ Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:06-CR-461-1 Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing theJudgment in a Cri minal Case, Marco Tulio Mendoza-Gomez raises arguments that areforeclosed by Almendarez-Torresv. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The appellant's motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and thejudgment ofthe district court is AFFIRMED.
BATHYMETRIC MAP

Piblanad a1 Washington. DC

US. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

MANOMAL OCEANIC AND Al) ADWIRESTRATION.
TMANOMAL OCEAN SURVEY

MeSHrrMETMC CONTOUR TERNAL. $0 wMTFEL TO mation DO
OPMLAMENTED Bo Ma mARTER nal vat

DATA saben tree wa
HomeDiplomatic Security Service Memorial...Taoufik Missaoui

# 				Taoufik Missaoui			

				Local Law Enforcement			

Deceased				March 6, 2020			

Major Taoufik Missaoui, with the Tunisian Public Order Brigade, was killed on March 6, 2020, when two men on a motorcycle approached the police post protecting the main pedestrian and VIP access point for the U.S. Embassy. Major Missaoui challenged the two men, directing them to move on. The passenger detonated a suicide vest, killing Major Missaoui.

Tags

Diplomatic Security Service MemorialTunisia

Back to Top
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 160 (Thursday, August 20, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 42061]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20070]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

ACTION: Notice of Public Meeting & Hearing Agenda.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date & Time: Wednesday, September 2, 2009, 10 a.m.-12 p.m. EDT (Morning 
Session); 1 p.m.-4 p.m. EDT (Afternoon Session).

Place: U.S. Election Assistance Commission, 1225 New York Ave, NW., 
Suite 150, Washington, DC 20005 (Metro Stop: Metro Center).

Agenda: The Commission will hold a public meeting to consider 
administrative matters. The Commission will receive an update about 
UOCAVA activities. The Commission will hear panelists discuss the July 
19, 2009 NASS Resolution on Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA) Grant 
and Payment Distinction. The Commission will have a hearing regarding 
Commercial-Off-The-Shelf (COTS) Software/Hardware.
    Members of the public may observe but not participate in EAC 
meetings unless this notice provides otherwise. Members of the public 
may use small electronic audio recording devices to record the 
proceedings. The use of other recording equipment and cameras requires 
advance notice to and coordination with the Commission's Communications 
Office.*

* View EAC Regulations Implementing Government in the Sunshine Act.

    This meeting will be open to the public.

Person to Contact for Information: Bryan Whitener, Telephone: (202) 
566-3100.

Alice Miller,
Chief Operating Officer, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
[FR Doc. E9-20070 Filed 8-18-09; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-KF-P
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 351.14 When are rate announcements that apply to Series EE savings bonds announced? ( a ) The Secretary will furnish rates that apply to Series EE savings bonds in announcements published each May 1 and November 1.
( b ) If the regularly scheduled date for the announcement is a day when we are not open for business, then the Secretary will make the announcement on the next business day. However, the effective date of the rate remains the first day of the month of the announcement.
( c ) The Secretary may announce rates at any other time.
§ 535.320 Domestic bank. ( a ) The term *domestic bank* shall mean any branch or office within the United States of any of the following which is not Iran or an Iranian entity: any bank or trust company incorporated under the banking laws of the United States or of any state, territory, or district of the United States, or any private bank or banker subject to supervision and examination under the banking laws of the United States or of any state, territory or district of the United States. The Secretary of the Treasury may also authorize any other banking institution to be treated as a “domestic bank” for the purpose of this definition or for the purpose of any or all sections of this part.
( b ) For purposes of §§ 535.413, 535.508, 535.531 and 535.901, the term *domestic bank* includes any branch or office within the United States of a non-Iranian foreign bank.
[44 FR 66832, Nov. 21, 1979]
#### Rowana K. RIGGS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The BOEING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 00-3178.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Feb. 22, 2001.

Before EBEL, KELLY, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

PAUL KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. *See*Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir.R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Plaintiff Rowana K. Riggs, appearing pro se, appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to defendant, the Boeing Company, on her claim alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213. The parties are familiar with the facts and the procedural history of this case, and we will not repeat them here. On appeal, Ms. Riggs claims the district court erred in finding that her mild carpal tunnel syndrome did not rise to the level of a “disability” under the ADA and in failing to consider all of her claims and evidence.

We review the grant of summary judgment *de novo,*applying the same standard *701as the district court. *Simms v. Oklahoma ex rel. Dep’t of Mental Health & Substance Abuse Servs.,*165 F.3d 1321, 1326 (10th Cir.), *cert. denied,*528 U.S. 815, 120 S.Ct. 53, 145 L.Ed.2d 46 (1999). Summary judgment is appropriate “if the pleadings, depositions, ans2wers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. R.Civ.P. 56(c). As required, “we view the evidence and draw reasonable inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party.” *Simms,*165 F.3d at 1326. Having carefully reviewed the record in that light, we find no error, and we affirm for substantially the reasons given by the district court in its Memorandum and Order dated May 19, 2000.

AFFIRMED.

*

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir.R. 36.3.
*

 This order is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of

the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its

persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

June 20, 2011

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

BOBBY M. ELLIS,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

WARDEN DAVID PARKER,

Respondent-Appellee.

No. 11-6091

(D.C. No. 5:10-CV-00498-W)

(W.D. Okla.)

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY*

Before LUCERO, ANDERSON, and GORSUCH, Circuit Judges.

An Oklahoma jury convicted Bobby M. Ellis of first-degree rape, lewd

molestation, and preparing child pornography, a result the Oklahoma Court of

Criminal Appeals affirmed. After unsuccessfully seeking state post-conviction

relief, Mr. Ellis eventually filed a federal habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

The district court, however, dismissed Mr. Ellis’s petition after determining it was

untimely, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1), and that none of the potential grounds for

statutory or equitable tolling of the limitations period could save the petition. 
- 2 -

Seeking to appeal that dismissal, Mr. Ellis asked the district court for a certificate

of appealability (“COA”), which the court denied. Now before this court, Mr.

Ellis renews his request for a COA.

We may issue a COA only if the petitioner makes a “substantial showing of

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). And where, as here,

the district court dismisses a § 2254 petition on procedural grounds, we may issue

a COA only if “jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court

was correct in its procedural ruling.” Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000). We conclude, however, that no reasonable jurist would debate the district

court’s holding that Mr. Ellis’s petition is time-barred, and for substantially the

same reasons given by the district court. Accordingly, we deny Mr. Ellis’s

application for a COA and dismiss this appeal. We also deny his motion for leave

to proceed in forma pauperis.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Neil M. Gorsuch

Circuit Judge