alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1087 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1087

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

                                 An Act

 
                    For the relief of Nguyen Quy An.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF CERTAIN NATURALIZATION REQUIREMENTS FOR NGUYEN QUY 
              AN.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the inability of Nguyen Quy An to 
meet the requirements of section 316 of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act that relate to having the status of an alien lawfully admitted for 
permanent residence, and residence and physical presence in the United 
States, if otherwise qualified he shall be considered eligible for 
naturalization and, upon filing an application for naturalization and 
being administered the oath of renunciation and allegiance pursuant to 
section 337 of such Act, shall be naturalized as a citizen of the 
United States.
    (b) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsection (a) 
shall apply only if the application for naturalization is filed with 
appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
§ 535.217 Blocking of property of the former Shah of Iran and of certain other Iranian nationals. ( a ) For the purpose of protecting the rights of litigants in courts within the United States, all property and assets located in the United States in the control of the estate of Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, the former Shah of Iran, or any close relative of the former Shah served as a defendant in litigation in such courts brought by Iran seeking the return of property alleged to belong to Iran, is blocked as to each such estate or person, until all such litigation against such estate or person is finally terminated. This provision shall apply only to such estate or persons as to which Iran has furnished proof of service to the Office of Foreign Assets Control and which the Office has identified in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) [No persons presently listed].
( c ) The effective date of this section is January 19, 1981, except as otherwise specified after the name of a person identified in paragraph (b) of this section.
(Secs. 201-207, 91 Stat. 1626, 50 U.S.C. 1701-1706; E.O. 12170, 44 FR 65729; E.O. 12205, 45 FR 24099; E.O. 12211, 45 FR 26685; E.O. 12276, 46 FR 7913; E.O. 12279, 46 FR 7919; E.O. 12280, 46 FR 7921; E.O. 12281, 46 FR 7923; E.O. 12282, 46 FR 7925; E.O. 12283, 46 FR 7927, and E.O. 12294, 46 FR 14111)
[46 FR 26478, May 13, 1981, as amended at 61 FR 8216, Mar. 4, 1996; 61 FR 15382, Apr. 8, 1996]
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Assistant Secretary Medina’s Travel to Israel and Egypt

# 									Assistant Secretary Medina’s Travel to Israel and Egypt							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

November 2, 2022

Assistant Secretary of State for Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs and Special Envoy for Biodiversity and Water Resources Monica P. Medina will travel to Tel Aviv, Israel, from November 3-5 as part of U.S.-Israel collaboration and knowledge-sharing on water reuse issues. While in Israel, she will meet with government officials and nongovernmental organizations and visit U.S.-supported water projects.

On November 6, Assistant Secretary Medina will travel to Sharm El-Sheikh, Egypt, to join the United States delegation to the 2022 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP27). While at COP27, Assistant Secretary Medina will focus on the intersections between the climate, biodiversity, and water scarcity crises. Along with head of delegation Special Presidential Envoy for Climate John Kerry, she will work to advance climate ambition, strengthen climate resilience, and ensure a strong outcome from COP27. For media inquiries, please contact OES-PA-DG@state.gov.

Tags

Bureau of Near Eastern AffairsBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsClimate ChangeCOP27EgyptEnvironmentIsraelOceansOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial International TravelWater

Back to Top
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 347.15 Computation of interest.

Retirement savings bonds under this subpart earn interest at the same annual percentage rate as securities issued to the Government Securities Investment Fund (G Fund) in the Thrift Savings Plan for federal employees. The Secretary calculates the G Fund interest rate pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 8438(e)(2). The retirement savings bond interest rate compounds daily at 1/360 of the annual percentage rate. Retirement savings bonds will cease to accrue interest on the date of their maturity.

[82 FR 6246, Jan. 19, 2017]
#### Sadie Kaplan *vs.*Grand Department Stores, Incorporated.

Maltbie, C. J., Haines, Hinman, Banks and Avery, Js.

Argued June 8th

decided July 16th, 1934.

*John C. Blackall,*for the appellant (defendant).

*George M. Hyman,*with whom, on the brief, was *Louis M. Shats,*for the appellee (plaintiff).

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff brought this action against the proprietor of a store to recover for injuries suffered when she slipped upon a bulge in a rubber mat at the top of a stairway used by its customers, and fell down the stairs. The defendant, appealing from a judgment for the plaintiff, makes two claims, one, that the defendant not having actual notice of the defective condition of the mat, was not chargeable with knowledge of it by reason of the length of time it had existed, and the other, that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as matter of law. There was evidence from which the trial court could reasonably infer that the bulge in the mat was due to its having become loosened, because it had become so worn that the tacks which were intended to hold it in place had pulled through, and the trial court could reasonably conclude that this condition came about from wear extending over a considerable time. It might properly find that, had the defendant made reasonable inspec*715tion of its premises, it would have discovered the condition in time to have remedied it before the plaintiff’s fall. *Vinci*v. *O’Neill,*103 Conn. 647, 657, 121 Atl. 408. This was the effect of the finding of the court and it must stand. As far as the issue of the plaintiff’s contributory negligence is concerned, the trial court could reasonably conclude that the situation fell within the rule that one making the ordinary use of premises which he may properly assume to be in a reasonably safe condition is not obliged to use special care until some circumstance reasonably indicates to him the need to do so. *Smith*v. *S. S. Kresge Co.,*116 Conn. 706, 164 Atl. 206.

There is no error.
§ 501.726 Motions. ( a ) *Generally.* Unless made during a hearing or conference, a motion shall be in writing, shall state with particularity the grounds therefor, shall set forth the relief or order sought, and shall be accompanied by a written brief of the points and authorities relied upon. Motions by a respondent must be filed with the Administrative Law Judge and served upon the Director through the Office of Chief Counsel and with any other party respondent or respondent's representative, unless otherwise directed by the Administrative Law Judge. Motions by the Director must be filed with the Administrative Law Judge and served upon each party respondent or respondent's representative. All written motions must be served in accordance with, and otherwise meet the requirements of, § 501.705. The Administrative Law Judge may order that an oral motion be submitted in writing. No oral argument shall be heard on any motion unless the Administrative Law Judge otherwise directs.
( b ) *Opposing and reply briefs.* Except as provided in § 501.741(e), briefs in opposition to a motion shall be filed not later than 15 days after service of the motion. Reply briefs shall be filed not later than 3 days after service of the opposition. The failure of a party to oppose a written motion or an oral motion made on the record shall be deemed a waiver of objection by that party to the entry of an order substantially in the form of any proposed order accompanying the motion.
( c ) *Dilatory motions.* Frivolous, dilatory, or repetitive motions are prohibited. The filing of such motions may form the basis for sanctions.
( d ) *Length limitation.* Except as otherwise ordered by the Administrative Law Judge, a brief in support of, or in opposition to, a motion shall not exceed 15 pages, exclusive of pages containing any table of contents, table of authorities, or addendum.
( e ) A motion to set aside a default shall be made within a reasonable time as determined by the Administrative Law Judge, state the reasons for the failure to appear or defend, and, if applicable, specify the nature of the proposed defense in the proceeding. In order to prevent injustice and on such conditions as may be appropriate, the Administrative Law Judge, at any time prior to the filing of his or her decision, or the Secretary's designee, at any time during the review process, may for good cause shown set aside a default.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 352.13 Fiscal agents.

(a) Federal Reserve Banks and Branches, referred to below, as fiscal agents of the United States, are authorized to perform such services as may be requested of them by the Secretary of the Treasury, or his or her delegate, in connection with the issue, servicing, and redemption of Series HH bonds.

(b)

(1) The following Federal Reserve Offices have been designated to provide savings bond services:

| Servicing office | Reserve districts served | Geographic area served |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Federal Reserve Bank, Buffalo Branch, P.O. Box 961, Buffalo, NY 14240 | New York, Boston | CT, MA, ME, NH, NJ (northern half), NY (City & State), RI, VT, Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands. |
| Federal Reserve Bank, Pittsburgh Branch, P.O. Box 867, Pittsburgh, PA 15230 | Cleveland, Philadelphia | DE, KY (eastern half), NJ (southern half), OH, PA, WV (northern panhandle). |
| Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, P.O. Box 27622, Richmond, VA 23261 | Richmond, Atlanta | AL, DC, FL, LA (southern half), MD, MS (southern half), NC, SC, TN (eastern half), VA, WV (except northern panhandle). |
| Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, 250 Marquette Avenue, Minneapolis, MN 55480 | Minneapolis, Chicago | IA, IL (northern half), IN (northern half), MN, MT, ND, SD, WI. |
| Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, MO 64198 | Dallas, San Francisco, Kansas City, St. Louis | AK, AR, AZ, CA, CO, HI, ID, IL (southern half), IN (southern half), KS, KY (western half), LA (northern half), MO, MS (northern half), NE, NM, NV, OK, OR, TN (western half), TX, WA, WY, UT and GU. |

(2) Until March 1, 1996, other Federal Reserve Offices may continue to provide some savings bond services, but such services will be phased out over the period prior to that date.

[59 FR 10541, Mar. 4, 1994]
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov> To: "Smith, James R. (Randy)" <JRSmith@rrienergy.com> Date: 7/26/2010 11:26 AM Subject: Re: RRI Request for ICR Extension Attachments: pic05786.jpg; pic12263.jpg; RRI corporate Extension Request Letter.pdf

Greetings,

EPA has reviewed your extension requ est for the steam electric effluent guidelines questionnaire for the following RRI Energy Inc. facilities:

Avon Lake Plant - replied to Daniel A. Rogatto on July 20, 2010 Brunot Island - replied to Rocco Tondo on July 20, 2010 Cheswick Power Plant - replied to Daniel Griffin on July 20, 2010 Choctaw - replied to Howard Holder on July 20, 2010 Conemaugh - replied to Richard Beer on July 19, 2010 Coolwater - replied to Stephen Swift on July 22, 2010 Elrama Power Plant - replied to Rocco Tondo on July 20, 2010 Hunterstown Indian River Keystone - replied to James Lafontaine on July 20, 2010 Mandalay - replied to Thomas A. Di Ciolli on July 21, 2010 New Castle Plant - replied to Jo seph R. Dulovich on July 21, 2010 Niles - replied to Rocco Tondo on July 20, 2010 Portland - replied to William H. Wood on July 22, 2010 Seward - replied to Gregory J. Mitchell on July 20, 2010 Shawville Titus - replied to Jeffrey A. Marks on July 20, 2010

Plants that have not been replied individually are addressed in this response. The deadline for your plant to submit Version 1 or Version 2 of the completed questionnaire is extended to October 15, 2010. Please note that the deadline for Part G, if applicable, is unchanged and remains 120 days after receipt of the questionnaire. No extensions are granted for Versions 3 or 4 of the questionnaire; the deadline for plants receiving these questionnaires remains 90 days after receipt.

If you need assistance during the completion of the steam electric questionnaire, please contact the steam electric helpline via e-mail at steamhelp@erg.com or by phone at 1-877-353-7560.

Sincerely,

(Embedded image moved to file: pic05786.jpg)

From: "Smith, James R. (Randy)" <JRSmith@rrienergy.com>

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 06/25/2010 12:22 PM

Subject: RRI Request for ICR Extension(Embedded image moved to file: pic12263.jpg)

Alicea, please find attached RRI correspondence for EPA’s consideration to extend the deadline to complete and comply for the RRI steam-electric generating facilities Effluent ICR requirements.

If there are any questions, do not hesitate to contact me.

Randy Smith Engineering & Technical Services 832-357-4632 (NEW) 832-357-7420 Fax

(See attached file: RRI corporate Extension Request Letter.pdf)
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Bosnia and Herzegovina Statehood Day

# 									Bosnia and Herzegovina Statehood Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

November 25, 2022

On behalf of the United States of America, I wish the people of Bosnia and Herzegovina a heartfelt congratulations as you celebrate Statehood Day.

Bosnia and Herzegovina is at a pivotal moment in its history. In the weeks and months ahead, Bosnia and Herzegovina’s leaders have the opportunity to end the politics of division and to form stable and functioning governments able to pursue the reforms necessary to secure its rightful place in the Euro-Atlantic community of nations. The United States continues to strongly support your sovereignty, territorial integrity, and multiethnic character. I look forward to strengthening our partnership on security, energy diversification, and anticorruption in the months ahead.

Today is an opportunity to come together as a country and forge a path of reconciliation, partnership, and progress. The United States remains committed to helping advance your goals for a more secure, peaceful, and prosperous future for all.

Tags

Bosnia and HerzegovinaBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonPeaceThe Secretary of StateSecurity

Back to Top
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 17 (Wednesday, January 28, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 4950]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1971]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATE AND TIME: Wednesday, February 4, 2009, 10 a.m.-12 noon.

PLACE: U.S. Election Assistance Commission, 1225 New York Ave., NW., 
Suite 150, Washington, DC 20005, (Metro Stop: Metro Center).

AGENDA: The Commission will receive an update on the voting system 
certification program. Commissioners will install new officers for 
2009. The Commission will consider other administrative matters.
    This meeting will be open to the public.

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: Bryan Whitener, Telephone: (202) 566-
3100.

Rosemary Rodriguez,
Commissioner, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
 [FR Doc. E9-1971 Filed 1-26-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6820-KF-P
#### Michael FINCHAM, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ronald J. ANGELONE, Director, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 02-6010.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 23, 2002.

Decided June 6, 2002.

Michael Fincham, Appellant Pro Se. John H. McLees, Jr., Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

*613PER CURIAM.

Michael Fincham appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *See Fincham v. Angelone,*No. CA-01-371 (E.D.Va. Dec. 12, 2001). Finding no exceptional circumstances, we further decline to review Fincham’s claims raised for the first time on appeal. *See Muth v. United States,*1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir.1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
§ 16.8 Service of complaint. ( a ) Service of a complaint must be made by a certified or registered mail or by delivery in any manner authorized by Rule 4(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
( b ) Proof of service, stating the name and address of the person on whom the complaint was served, and the manner and date of service, may be made by— ( 1 ) Affidavit of the individual making service;
( 2 ) An acknowledged United States Postal Service return receipt card; or
( 3 ) Written acknowledgement of the defendant or his representative.
#### Starke County Board of Zoning Appeals *v.*Arnett.

[No. 20,364.

Filed September 2, 1965.]

*454
      *E. Ray Barker^*of North Judson, for appellant.

*Jack Murray,*of Knox, for appellee.

Bierly, C. J.

Appellant, pn April 8, 1965, filed a petition for extensión of time in which to file áppellant’s brief, record of transcript and assignment of •errors with bill of exceptions,'and was granted time to and including July 20,1965.

Subsequent thereto, on May 24, 1965, appellee filed a Special Appearance and Motion to Dismiss. No action was taken by the court on this motion.

Thereafter, on June 20, 1965, appellant filed a second petition for extension of time in which to file record, of transcript and assignment of errors with bill of exceptions. This petition was granted and appellant was given time to and including August 16, 1965 to file said transcript and assignment of errors.

Thence, On July 21, 1965, appellee filed Second Motion to Dismiss and Special Appearance. The court, bn July 30, 1965, entered an order that this second motion to dismiss appeal be held in abeyance pending further action by the court.

On August 26, 1965 appellee filed a third motion to dismiss.and special appearance.

The various motions are now submitted to the court for determination and action;

And the court, having examined said motions and *455having been duly advised, finds that the due date for filing transcript and assignment of errors was August 16, 1965; that appellant has, as of this date, failed to file a transcript and assignment of errors, nor has said appellant filed an information to the effect that an emergency had arisen preventing the filing of said transcript and assignment of errors within time;

And the court further finds that said appeal should be dismissed.

IT IS. THEREFORE CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED BY THE court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed, costs to be taxed against' the. appellant.

Appeal dismissed.

Note. — Reported in 209 N. E. 2d 892.
NUMBER 13-24-00319-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

IN RE ED MONCE

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Tijerina and Peña

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Contreras1

Relator Ed Monce filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel the trial 

court to vacate a temporary restraining order and an extension order; however, relator 

has now filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this petition for writ of mandamus. 

According to the unopposed motion to dismiss, relator has reached an agreement with 

real parties in interest Christopher Majka, Tressa Majka, and Esplanade Investments 

1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not 

required to do so. When granting relief, the court must hand down an opinion as in any other case.”); id. R. 

47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).
2

L.L.C. that disposes of the necessity of seeking mandamus relief.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the unopposed motion to 

dismiss, is of the opinion that it should be granted. Accordingly, we lift the stay previously 

imposed in this case, we grant the unopposed motion to dismiss, and we dismiss the 

petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10.

DORI CONTRERAS

Chief Justice

Delivered and filed on the

27th day of June, 2024.
#### § 525.503 Exclusion from licenses.

OFAC reserves the right to exclude any person, property, transaction, or class thereof from the operation of any license or from the privileges conferred by any license. OFAC also reserves the right to restrict the applicability of any license to particular persons, property, transactions, or classes thereof. Such actions are binding upon actual or constructive notice of the exclusions or restrictions.
MEMORANDUM

To: File From: Sasha Gerhard Subject: Meeting with National Association of Clean Water Agencies (NACWA) Date: 7/31/09

On May 21, 2009, EPA (Director of Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery, Division Director of Program Implementation and Informa tion Division, staff from Office of Air Quality and Planning Standards, staff from Office of Water, and Office of General Counsel) met with Chris Hornback and Keith Jones of NACWA, Doug McWilliams and Karen Winters of Squire Sanders, legal counsel for NACWA, and Bob Do minak of Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District, NACWA member. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss comments submitted by NACWA in response to EPA’s Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM). Specifically, NACWA provided additional information to EPA for sewage sludge in cinerators such as: incinerator design and emission controls and the regulations currently applicable to sewage sludge incinerators. Several handouts were provided to meeting participants and are included as attachments. They are: “Biosolids Management” Handbook; “Improvements in Biosolids Quality Due to EPA’s Pretreatment and Biosolids Programs” conference paper; and “Sewage Sludge (Biosolids) Fact Sheet.” Also, a list of participants, a meeti ng request letter from NACWA, and a post meeting letter from NACWA, accompanied by a spreadsheet containing additional emission data, are included. Attachments