alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-71,582]

Pursuant to Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated in response to a worker petition filed on July 8, 2009 on behalf of workers of Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester, New York.

The petitioning group of workers is covered by an earlier petition (TA-W-71,479) filed on June 30, 2009 that is the subject of an ongoing investigation for which a determination has not yet been issued. Further investigation in this case would duplicate efforts and serve no purpose; therefore the investigation under this petition has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of July 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-20468 Filed 8-25-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
§ 34.205 Council's audited financial statements and audits. ( a ) Not later than December 1, 2014, and each year thereafter, the Council must prepare and submit to the Secretary of the Treasury an audited financial statement for the preceding Federal fiscal year, covering all accounts and associated activities of the Council.
( b ) Each audited financial statement under this section must reflect: ( 1 ) The overall financial position of the accounts and activities covered by the statement, including assets and liabilities thereof.
( 2 ) Results of operations of the Council.
( c ) The financial statements must be prepared in accordance with the form and content of the financial statements prescribed by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget for executive agencies pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3515, consistent with applicable accounting and financial reporting principles, standards, and requirements.
( d ) The Treasury Inspector General may conduct audits and reviews of the Council's accounts and activities as the Inspector General deems appropriate.
**Exhibit 32.01**
  **Certifications
        Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**
 **As
        Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the**
 **Sarbanes—Oxley
        Act of 2002**
  I,
        Marcel
        Martin, the Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Haynes
        International, Inc., certify that (i) the quarterly report on
        Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully
        complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the
        Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
        and
        results of operations of Haynes International, Inc. as of the dates and for
        the periods set forth therein.
  /s/
                  Marcel MartinMarcel
                  Martin*Vice
                  President Finance and*
                *Chief
                  Financial Officer*May
                  8, 2008Date
   I,
        Francis J. Petro, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Haynes
        International, Inc., certify that (i) the quarterly report on
        Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully
        complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the
        Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
        and
        results of operations of Haynes International, Inc. as of the dates and for
        the periods set forth therein.
  /s/
                  Francis J. PetroFrancis
                  J. Petro*President
                  and Chief Executive Officer*May
                  8, 2008Date
#### § 546.306 Foreign person.

The term *foreign person* means any person that is not a U.S. person.

[89 FR 15748, Mar. 5, 2024]
# Bureau of African Affairs Releases

2673 items

        -    Report  		South Africa	  March 3, 2017 
        -    Report  		Somalia	  March 3, 2017 
        -    Report  		Mauritania	  March 3, 2017 
        -    Report  		Democratic Republic of the Congo	  March 3, 2017 
        -    Report  		Mali	  March 3, 2017 
        -    Report  		Comoros	  March 3, 2017 
        -    Report  		Malawi	  March 3, 2017 
        -    Report  		Chad	  March 3, 2017 
        -    Report  		Central African Republic	  March 3, 2017 
        -    Report  		Madagascar	  March 3, 2017 

previous page1…263264265266267268next page

Back to Top
§ 552.404 Transactions ordinarily incident to a licensed transaction. ( a ) Any transaction ordinarily incident to a licensed transaction and necessary to give effect thereto is also authorized, except: ( 1 ) An ordinarily incident transaction, not explicitly authorized within the terms of the license, by or with a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 552.201; or
( 2 ) An ordinarily incident transaction, not explicitly authorized within the terms of the license, involving a debit to a blocked account or a transfer of blocked property.
( b ) For example, a license authorizing a person to complete a securities sale involving Company A, whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 552.201, also authorizes other persons to engage in activities that are ordinarily incident and necessary to complete the sale, including transactions by the buyer, broker, transfer agents, and banks, provided that such other persons are not themselves persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 552.201.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 321.23 Paying agent fees and charges. ( a ) *Fees.* Fees may be paid as outlined in this section. A schedule setting out the fees, and the basis on which they are computed and paid, is separately published in the Federal Register. Current information is available from a TRS Site or online at *www.treasurydirect.gov .*
( b ) *Discontinuance, reduction, or delay in fees.* The Secretary may authorize, upon notice in the Federal Register, the discontinuance, reduction, or delay of fee payments.
( c ) *Charges to presenters.* A paying agent shall not make any charge whatever to persons entitled to request payment of securities, for redeeming them under the provisions of this part.
[77 FR 16167, Mar. 20, 2012]
HomeBiographies...Ramin Toloui

# 				Ramin Toloui			

															Assistant Secretary						Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs												

				January 24, 2022 -									Present							

*summa cum laude*

Tags

Bureau of Economic and Business AffairsState Department Official

Back to Top
§ 552.206 Exempt transactions. ( a ) *Personal communications.* The prohibitions contained in this part do not apply to any postal, telegraphic, telephonic, or other personal communication that does not involve the transfer of anything of value.
( b ) *Official business.* The prohibitions contained in § 552.201(a) do not apply to transactions for the conduct of the official business of the United States Government by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof.
EX-4.39 Addendum No. 1/Ocean Voyager Limited



 





Exhibit 4.39



[Confidential Treatment]




Addendum No. 1 to the bareboat charter dated 20 April 2004 between NCL (Bahamas) Ltd. as
charterers and Ocean Voyager Limited as owners in relation to the vessel named “MV Norwegian
Majesty” (the “Charter”)





	1.	 	The parties have agreed that the Charter Period set out in box 21 of the Charter shall
be amended to read “The Vessel shall be redelivered between [**] [Confidential Treatment]
”.






	2.	 	Save as expressly provided by this Addendum No. 1, all other terms and conditions of
the Charter shall remain unamended and in full force and effect.





Mark E.
Warren
                                                                        

For and on behalf of NCL (Bahamas) Ltd.




Date: 28 November 2006




Mark E.
Warren
                                                                               

For and on behalf of Ocean Voyager Limited




Date:
28 November  2006
586 P.2d 201

#### John R. HIXON, Appellant, v. George B. MORSE and Jeanette Sechrist, not Individually, but in their official capacities, and the State Compensation Fund of Arizona, Appellees.

No. 2 CA-CIV 2837.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.

July 5, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 5, 1978.

Review Denied Oct. 5, 1978.

*357Rabinovitz, Dix & Sands by Bernard I. Rabinovitz and Charles G. Rehling, Tucson, for appellant.

Everett, Bury & Moeller, P. C. by Leonard Everett and Marshall Humphrey III, Tucson, for appellees.

OPINION

RICHMOND, Chief Judge.

This case is a sequel to *Hixon v. State Compensation Fund,*115 Ariz. 392, 565 P.2d 898 (App.1977), in which this court affirmed dismissal of appellant’s complaint. After holding that the superior court lacked jurisdiction to review termination of appellant’s workmen’s compensation benefits, we addressed appellant’s characterization in the complaint of an alleged conspiracy by two state compensation fund employees to terminate his benefits improperly:

> “The bare allegation that the State Compensation Fund employees’ conduct was an intentional infliction of mental and emotional distress fails to state a claim for relief. While Arizona recognizes the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress, an essential element thereof is conduct so outrageous in character, and so extreme in degree, as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency, and to be regarded as atrocious and utterly intolerable in a civilized community. [Citations omitted.] The alleged issuance of a defective notice of claim status terminating benefits does not amount to the extreme or outrageous conduct required to state a claim for relief.” 115 Ariz. at 393, 565 P.2d at 899.

Appellant thereafter commenced another action, embellishing his earlier complaint with allegations that the purpose of the employees’ conspiracy “was to intentionally, maliciously, and wantonly cause [appellant], a totally disabled workman with a psychiatric disability, to be left without medical and psychiatric treatment and without a means to sustain his life,” and that the employees’ conduct “was so extreme and outrageous and beyond all possible bounds of decency, as to be regarded as atrocious and utterly intolerable in a civilized community.”

Subsequently, appellees’ motion for summary judgment was granted on the ground that appellant’s claim was barred as *res judicata.*We agree.

Regardless of the additional allegations, appellant’s claim arises solely from the termination of his workmen’s compensation benefits by an administrative decision, for which the exclusive remedy for review lay with the Industrial Commission of Arizona. *Sandoval v. Salt River Project,*117 Ariz. 209, 571 P.2d 706 (App.1977). As such, it is barred by the judgment of dis*358missal on the identical underlying facts in the previous case.

Any implication from this court’s previous opinion that a claim for relief for intentional infliction of emotional distress might arise solely from the wrongful deprivation of workmen’s compensation benefits is hereby disavowed in favor of the explicit holding in *Sandoval,*supra.

Affirmed.

HOWARD and HATHAWAY, JJ., concur.
§ 560.406 Transshipment or transit through the United States. ( a ) The prohibitions in § 560.201 apply to the importation into the United States, for transshipment or transit, of Iranian-origin goods or goods owned or controlled by the Government of Iran which are intended or destined for third countries.
( b ) The prohibitions in § 560.204 apply to the transshipment or transit of foreign goods through the United States which are intended or destined for Iran or the Government of Iran, including entities owned or controlled by the Government of Iran.
( c ) Goods in which the Government of Iran, any Iranian financial institution, or any other person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 560.211 has an interest which are imported into or transshipped through the United States are subject to the prohibitions in § 560.211.
Unassociated Document


EXHIBIT 10.1


 


 


 


 


 


WAIVER OF ANNUAL INCENTIVE







This Waiver of Annual Incentive is entered into by the undersigned participant in the [Annual Incentive Compensation Plan][Annual Performance Bonus Program] (the “Plan”) of Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) effective as of August 28, 2012.







The Compensation Committee of the Company (the “Committee”) has scheduled a special meeting of the Committee to be held on August 28, 2012 to, among other things, consider a proposal to grant an option (the “Option”) to purchase Class A Common Stock of the Company to the undersigned participant (as well as several other Company executives), subject to and conditioned upon the waiver by the undersigned participant of his or her right to receive a payout under the Plan based on performance in fiscal 2012.  The proposed terms of the Option are that the exercise price will be 120-125% (as determined by the Committee) of the closing price of the Class A Common Stock on August 28, 2012
as reported by NASDAQ, the number of shares covered by the Option will be determined by dividing the undersigned participant’s target bonus amount under the Plan for fiscal 2012 by the Black Scholes option value per share of the Option as determined by the Company’s accounting department, the term of the Option will be 5-7 years (as determined by the Committee), and the Option will become exercisable for one hundred percent of the shares on August 28, 2014 subject to continued employment with the Company.







Subject to and effective upon the grant of the Option to the undersigned participant by the Committee, and in consideration of the grant of the Option, the undersigned participant hereby irrevocably waives any and all rights he or she may have to any payout under the Plan based on the performance of the undersigned or the Company in fiscal 2012.


 


 




 



	 	 
	 
Signature

	 
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	 
Type or Print Name
#### § 549.311 U.S. financial institution.

The term *U.S. financial institution* means any U.S. entity (including its foreign branches) that is engaged in the business of accepting deposits, making, granting, transferring, holding, or brokering loans or credits, or purchasing or selling foreign exchange, securities, commodity futures or options, or procuring purchasers and sellers thereof, as principal or agent. It includes but is not limited to depository institutions, banks, savings banks, trust companies, securities brokers and dealers, commodity futures and options brokers and dealers, forward contract and foreign exchange merchants, securities and commodities exchanges, clearing corporations, investment companies, employee benefit plans, and U.S. holding companies, U.S. affiliates, or U.S. subsidiaries of any of the foregoing. This term includes those branches, offices, and agencies of foreign financial institutions that are located in the United States, but not such institutions' foreign branches, offices, or agencies.
# L_2019160EN.01001001.xml

| 18.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 160/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 160/10

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) 2019/988

of 17 June 2019

correcting the French language version of Regulation (EU) No 10/2011 on plastic materials and articles intended to come into contact with food

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 2004 on materials and articles intended to come into contact with food and repealing Directives 80/590/EEC and 89/109/EEC (1), in particular Article 5(1)(a), (d), (e), (h), (i) and (j), Article 11(3) and Article 12(6) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The French language version of Commission Regulation (EU) No 10/2011 (2) contains an error as regards the specific migration limit set out in Annex I, Table 1, point 1, row 1052. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The French language version of Commission Regulation (EU) No 10/2011 (2) contains an error as regards the specific migration limit set out in Annex I, Table 1, point 1, row 1052.

| (2) | The French language version of Regulation (EU) No 10/2011 should therefore be corrected accordingly. The other language versions are not affected. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The French language version of Regulation (EU) No 10/2011 should therefore be corrected accordingly. The other language versions are not affected.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

(does not concern the English language)

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 June 2019.

For the Commission

The President

Jean-Claude JUNCKER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 338, 13.11.2004, p. 4.

1

(2)  Commission Regulation (EU) No 10/2011 of 14 January 2011 on plastic materials and articles intended to come into contact with food (OJ L 12, 15.1.2011, p. 1).

2

---
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 245.2 Definitions. For purposes of this part: ( a ) *Agency* means each authority of the United States for which the Treasury of the United States issues checks or for which checks drawn on the Treasury of the United States are issued.
( b ) *Check* means a check drawn on the United States Treasury.
( c ) *Certifying Agency* means an agency for whom a Treasury disbursing officer or a non-Treasury disbursing officer makes payment in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3325. The responsibilities of a certifying official are set forth at 31 U.S.C. 3528.
( d ) *Commissioner* means the Commissioner of the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, Department of the Treasury, 401 14th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20227.
( e ) *Person* means an individual, a partnership, a corporation, a labor organization, a government or a subdivision or instrumentality thereof, and any other entity to which a check may be issued.
( f ) *Replacement check* means a check issued pursuant to the recertification of payment by a certifying official.
( g ) *Secretary* means the Secretary of the Treasury.
#### Leon Cooper, Respondent, *against*John Allport, Appellant.

(Decided February 6th, 1882.)

Where an infant, after a purchase of property by him, claiming the right to rescind the purchase on the ground of his infancy, restores the property to the vendor, and it is accepted by the latter, the infant may recover back money paid by him to the vendor upon the purchase.

Appeal from the judgment of a district court in the City of New York.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

Van Brunt, P. J.

The plaintiff in this action being an infant bought certain property of the defendant for the sum of $250, and paid $100 on account and gave back a mortgage for $150, and entered into possession of the property. Shortly thereafter, claiming that he was an infant, he restored the property to the defendant, who accepted the same, and brought this suit by his guardian to recover the money which he had paid on account. The justice below decided in favor of the-plaintiff, and from that judgment this appeal is taken.

It is true that Parsons lays down the rule that “ if an infant advances money on a voidable contract which he after-wards rescinds, he cannot recover the money back, because it is lost to him by his own act, and the privilege of infancy-does not extend so far as to restore this money unless it was obtained from him by fraud.” And also that “if the infant pays money on his contract and enjoys the benefit of it, and then avoids it when he becomes of age, he cannot recover back the consideration paid.” But it is equally stated by Parsons that “ an infant can rescind his purchase and recover the price he paid, only when he is ready to return the thing purchased;” and it is also held *“*that an infant has a right to avoid an ex-ecutory contract at any time before it becomes an executed contract.”

*353Although at first sight it may seem somewhat difficult to harmonize these principles, yet in the disposition of this case no difficulty stands in the way. As an infant’s executory contract is voidable he has a right to dis-affirm. Two persons, whether one is an infant and the other an adult or not, have the right to rescind a contract which had previously been made. Now, according to the evidence in this case, the contract between the infant and the defendant was by both parties rescinded, because the defendant received the property upon the admitted rescission of the infant, and he therefore accepted such rescission, and it is to be concluded from that fact that there was a mutual rescission between the parties. Under those circumstances the party who accepts the rescission is bound to pay over to the party rescinding all which he has received under the contract.

In view of this fact, the defendant having accepted his rescission, he was bound to repay that which he. has received under the contract which has been rescinded by the parties.

The judgment of the district court must therefore be affirmed.

Beach, J., concurred.

Judgment affirmed.
#### § 544.704 Administrative collection; referral to United States Department of Justice.

In the event that the violator does not pay the penalty imposed pursuant to this part or make payment arrangements acceptable to the Director of the Office of Foreign Assets Control, the matter may be referred for administrative collection measures by the Department of the Treasury or to the United States Department of Justice for appropriate action to recover the penalty in a civil suit in a federal district court.