TONIGHT’S PROTOCOL 

1. Hearings are conducted in accordance with Title 33 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 327, 

published November 13, 1986. 

2. Any person may appear at the hearing on his or her own behalf or may be represented by counsel or by 

another representative. 

3. Hearings will be conducted orderly, but expeditiously, by the presiding officer or hearing 

moderator/facilitator. 

4. After the opening remarks by the presiding officer, time may be allowed for presentation describing the 

proposed project. 

5. After the presentations, elected and appointed officials will be given an opportunity to present their 

official comments regarding the proposed project. 

6. The general public will then have an opportunity to make oral statements, present written statements, 

make oral presentations, and make recommendations as to any appropriate decision. Cross-examination 

will not be allowed. All questions will be directed to the presiding officer for the record. The hearing will 

continue until everyone (who has requested) has had a chance to speak. Exceptions to this protocol will be 

decided by the moderator. 

7. All comments, written and oral, receive equal consideration (lengthy written statements should be 

summarized orally, and the entire written statement should be submitted for the record). 

8. The presiding officer may establish reasonable time limits for (all) individual comments in order to 

ensure that all who have requested will have an opportunity to speak on the record. 

9. The hearing file will remain open for a period to be determined by the presiding officer from the date of 

the hearing for the submission of additional statements. 

10. The presiding officer will have the power to recess or suspend the hearing and, at the presiding officer’s 

discretion, reconvene it at a later date. 

11. A transcript of the hearing will be prepared. Copies may be purchased from the hearing reporter. 

SPEAKERS WILL BE CALLED IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER: 

o Members of Congress or his/her representatives

o Governor or his/her representative

o Other elected state officials

o Local elected officials

o Representatives of federal agencies

o Representatives of state agencies

o Representatives of local agencies

o All others, in the order in which cards were turned in
Environmental Impact Statement 

An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)... 

• Is prepared in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and presents the results of analyses of 

the environmental effects of a proposed action and its alternatives. 

• Requires opportunities for public involvement in agency planning. 

• Is prepared when a proposed action could cause significant environmental impacts. 

What is the proposed action of this EIS? 

The Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Commission proposed that the Army realign Fort Belvoir according to BRAC law. 

This EIS will analyze implementation of the BRAC recommendations and the relocation of approximately 22,000 workers to Fort 

Belvoir. The land use portion of the installation’s Master Plan Long Range Component needs to be updated to accommodate 

BRAC activities on Fort Belvoir. Therefore, the EIS will evaluate alternative land use plans to accommodate the following BRAC 

2005 requirements and impacts associated with siting of the BRAC activities. 

• National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) and Washington Headquarters Services (WHS) leased and governmentowned facilities within the National Capital Region (NCR) 

• Primary and secondary medical care functions from Walter Reed Medical Center to a new, expanded Dewitt Army 

Community Hospital 

• Other Army and DoD organizations from NCR leased space 

The complete Fort Belvoir Master Plan update and the National Museum of the Army are not being evaluated in this EIS, but will 

be evaluated in future NEPA studies. 

What alternatives does this EIS evaluate? 

• Town Center—new facilities primarily sited between J.J. Kingman Road on North Post and 12th Street on South Post 

• City Center—new facilities primarily sited on Engineer Proving Ground (EPG) and a 60-acre parcel owned by the 

General Services Administration (GSA) 

• Satellite Campuses—new facilities primarily sited on EPG, Davidson Army Airfield, North Post, and South Post (from 

Kingman Road to 12th Street) 

• Preferred Alternative—hybrid of first three alternatives 

• No Action Alternative— A No Action Alternative represents what would occur if the Army were not to implement 

BRAC recommendations at Fort Belvoir. Inclusion of the No Action Alternative in the EIS serves as a benchmark 

against which the potential effects of the Proposed Action and alternatives can be evaluated and is a required part of the 

environmental investigation. Implementing this alternative would require additional Congressional action. 

What impacts were identified and discussed in the EIS? 

The Army will use the results of the environmental and socioeconomic impact analysis within the EIS to determine how to 

implement the BRAC recommendations for Fort Belvoir. 

• Direct and indirect effects 

• Short-term and long-term impacts 

• Cumulative effects 

• Irreversible and irretrievable commitments of resources 

• Adverse effects that cannot be avoided 

• Short-term uses of the environment and maintenance and enhancement of long-term productivity 

Agency Coordination 

To pursue smart growth and make on-post development and transportation decisions that are strategic within a regional 

perspective, the Army continues to coordinate closely with federal, state, and local agencies and leaders including but not 

limited to 

• National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC) 

• U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) 

• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) 

• Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (VDEQ) 

• Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) 

• Virginia State Historic Preservation Office (VA SHPO) 

• Mount Vernon Council of Citizens Association 

• Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation (VDCR) 

• Fairfax County 

• Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (MWCOG) 

• Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) 

• Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) 
(More comment sheets are available if you need additional space.) 

Comment Form 

Environmental Impact Statement for Implementation of 

2005 Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Recommendations 

and Related Army Actions at Fort Belvoir, Virginia

NOTE: All information submitted will become public record. 

1. Your information: 

Name: _____________________________________________________________ 

Title: ______________________________________________________________ 

Agency/Organization: _________________________________________________ 

Address: ____________________________________________________________ 

City, State, Zip: ______________________________________________________ 

Phone: _____________________________________________________________ 

E-mail: _____________________________________________________________ 

□ Please send a CD copy of the Final EIS to me. 

2. Please check the one affiliation that best represents your role or interest in the EIS: 

□ Fort Belvoir Resident □ Recreational Organization 

□ State Government □ Private Citizen 

□ School/University □ Federal Government 

□ Civic Organization □ Business/Commercial Organization 

□ Federally Recognized Tribe □ Environmental Organization 

□ County □ Other: ____________________ 

3. EIS Areas of Concern. Please check the appropriate boxes and write your specific 

comments about the area of concern in # 4 below. More Comment Forms are 

provided at the Written Comments table if you need additional space. 

□ Construction □ Noise 

□ Traffic and Transportation □ Native American Resources 

□ Cultural Resources/Historic Properties □ Air Quality 

□ Socioeconomics □ Water Quality 

□ Wetlands, Wildlife, Endangered Species □ Other: _____________________ 
(More comment sheets are available if you need additional space.) 

4. Please write your comments in the space provided below. 

 ________________________________________________________________ 

 ________________________________________________________________ 

 ________________________________________________________________ 

 ________________________________________________________________ 

 ________________________________________________________________ 

 ________________________________________________________________ 

 ________________________________________________________________ 

 ________________________________________________________________ 

 ________________________________________________________________ 

 ________________________________________________________________ 

 ________________________________________________________________ 

 ________________________________________________________________ 

 ________________________________________________________________ 

 ________________________________________________________________ 

 ________________________________________________________________ 

 ________________________________________________________________ 

 ________________________________________________________________ 

 ________________________________________________________________ 

 ________________________________________________________________ 

 ________________________________________________________________ 

 ________________________________________________________________ 

 ________________________________________________________________ 

 ________________________________________________________________ 

 ________________________________________________________________ 

Web Site

Comments may be submitted online at: www.BelvoirBRAC-EIS.net

E-mail: Comments may be e-mailed to: environmental@belvoir.army.mil

Mail: Comments may be mailed to: 

Attn.: EIS Comments

Fort Belvoir Directorate of Public Works

9430 Jackson Loop, Suite 100

Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-5116 

All comments must be received or postmarked by May 1, 2007 to 

be considered in preparation of the Final EIS.
Fort Belvoir DEIS Resource Areas 

• Land Use - Future development on-post and off-post 

- Land use incompatibilities 

- Airspace use from Davison Army Airfield 

- Compliance with Virginia’s Coastal Zone Management Program 

• Visual Resources - Impacts of BRAC development on viewsheds 

- Impacts on areas with high scenic integrity (i.e., Accotink Creek valley) 

• Air Quality - Impacts from construction and operation activities 

- Changes in emissions from changes in traffic volume and patterns 

- Compliance with federal and state air quality regulations 

• Noise - Noise impacts from construction and operation activities 

- Changes in noise levels due to changes in traffic volume and pattern 

• Geology and Soils - Compliance with state erosion control regulations 

- Changes in land cover from development 

• Water Resources - Impacts on surface and ground water quality from development 

- Compliance with state water quality regulations 

- Changes in runoff due to development of impervious surfaces 

- Impacts on floodplains and Chesapeake Bay resource protection areas 

• Biological Resources - Impacts on wildlife, threatened and endangered species, and wetlands 

- Sustainment of Environmental Quality Corridors 

• Cultural Resources - Impacts on both on- and off-post historic resources 

- Compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act 

• Socioeconomics - Projected population and housing changes 

- BRAC regional economic impact in terms of sales volume, income, and employment 

- Projected changes in the number of school-age children 

- Potential impacts on human health and environmental conditions in minority and low-income communities 

• Transportation - Impacts on traffic volume and patterns 

- Identifying transportation improvements to offset changes in off-post traffic 

• Utilities - Changes in water, sewer, electric, gas, and solid waste generation and consumption 

- Identifying energy–efficient utility improvements to meet changes in utility demand 

• Hazardous and Toxic Substances - Corrective action activities to clean up sites proposed for BRAC development 

- Changes in hazardous waste material generation 
Transportation 

Background 

• Fairfax County has more than 1 million residents and is expected to grow to 1.3 million by 2025 

• Many existing regional transportation facilities lack sufficient levels of service 

• Previous planning efforts have identified many improvement recommendations 

BRAC Impacts 

• Approximately 22,000 employees will relocate to Fort Belvoir 

• Proposed action is within employment and population forecasts for the area 

• The vast majority of expected additional employees already live and work in the region 

Potential Improvements 

The EIS identifies transportation improvements required to mitigate the impacts of the proposed action. Improvement 

concepts and designs are likely to come from either approved planning documents or ongoing studies in the area including 

the following: 

• Improvements proposed in regional, state, and local, long-range plans 

- TransAction 2030 (regional) 

- Constrained Long Range Plan (CLRP) 

- Six-Year Improvement Program 

- Fairfax County Transportation Plan (local) 

• Improvements developed as part of ongoing studies 

- Fort Belvoir Master Plan 

- Springfield Connectivity Study 

- I-95 HOT Lanes Study 

Transportation Goals 

• Support and enhance an integrated, multimodal transportation system that includes improved transit service, increased 

road and transit capacity, and connections between potential activity centers 

• Recognize the linkage between transportation and land use 

• Develop proactive transportation management programs (i.e. “park once” strategy) 

• Promote ridesharing 

• Respect historical and environmental factors 

Commitment of Approach 

• Regional (Cumulative impacts) 

• Sub-regional (Secondary impacts) 

• Local (Access and facility design) 

• On-post (Internal circulation) 
Natural and Cultural Resources 

A detailed analysis of Fort Belvoir’s natural and cultural features are being analyzed to identify potential development 

constraints and to help determine the most suitable areas for development. 

Current Conditions 

• Fort Belvoir supports rich flora and fauna. 

- Small-whorled pogonia (state endangered, federally threatened) 

- Wood turtle (state threatened) 

- Bald eagle (federally threatened) 

- 263 species of birds including 61 Partners in Flight priority species, one of which is known to only occur at Fort 

Belvoir. 

- Wetlands (1,270 acres) 

• Fort Belvoir has a rich history and is home to a variety of historic and cultural resources. 

Analysis 

• Studies of wetlands, resource protection areas, environmental quality corridors, flora, fauna, threatened and endangered 

species, and historic and archaeological resources were undertaken. 

• The EIS used the results of these studies to determine effects of the BRAC action on natural, historic, and archaeological 

resources. 

• Areas that are considered generally not suitable for development include land within 

- Wetlands 

- Resource Protection Areas 

- Floodplains 

- Regulated wildlife habitats 

- Riparian and foraging buffer along the installation’s waterways (Dogue Creek, Potomac River, Gunston Cove, 

Accotink Bay, and Pohick Bay) 

- The forest and wildlife corridor that diagonally traverses the North Post from the installation’s boundary at 

Huntley Meadows Park to the Davison Army Airfield 

- Steep slopes (> 15 percent) 

- Regulated historic and archaeological features 

Please note: A public Section 106 meeting (to discuss BRAC impacts to cultural resources) will be held on 

May 2, 2007 at the South County Government Center (room 221C) in Alexandria from 7-9 PM. 
Cumulative Impacts 

In addition to the 20 projects being examined under the proposed action in this EIS, there are a number of other 

on-post non-BRAC projects that are being looked at as cumulative impacts. The Council on Environmental 

Quality regulations define a cumulative impact as “the impact on the environment which results from the 

incremental impact of the action when added to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions 

regardless of what agency (federal or non-federal) or person undertakes such other actions.” The cumulative 

actions include those on Fort Belvoir not related to BRAC occurring before 2015, actions on Fort Belvoir related 

to BRAC that occur after the 2011 BRAC deadline, and non-Army developments in the surrounding county 

within a 3-mile radius. The 2015 time frame captures reasonably foreseeable actions that might contribute to 

cumulative impacts associated with the proposed actions. Impacts beyond 2015 are not evaluated because their 

occurrence is too uncertain, and their prediction would be speculative. In accordance with these regulations, the 

EIS examines the cumulative effects of these types of actions on Fort Belvoir and in Fairfax County. 

Fort Belvoir is planning another 32 projects at the installation. These 32 non-BRAC projects range from smallscale projects involving only renovations of existing buildings to large projects involving the construction of new 

sizeable structures. Chief among this latter category would be proposals such as the National Museum of the U.S. 

Army and associated Museum Support Center. Each of these projects will undergo or have already undergone 

their own NEPA process. A complete list of the on-post cumulative projects is attached. 

There are 187 off-post non-Army projects planned within 3 miles of Fort Belvoir that range from building 

renovation to projects covering more than a hundred acres. A complete list of the off-post cumulative projects is 

attached. There are also a number of major proposed projects outside the 3-mile area. These include the following: 

• McLane Foodservice: Construction of distribution facility (Prince William County) 

• EnviroSolutions: Relocation of headquarters to Prince William County 

• PowerLoft: Data center under construction in new tech park (Prince William County) 

• Multiple housing developments under construction in Prince William County (future projects would be 

postponed for one year because of a moratorium on new housing construction) 

• Springfield Interchange (under construction) 

• Route 123 Bridge over the Occoquan River (under construction) 

• Woodrow Wilson Bridge (under construction) 

• Rolling Road widening to four lanes near Old Keene Mill Road (Route 644) 

• I-95/395/495 High Occupancy Toll (HOT) lanes 

• Construction of a high-capacity electrical transmission line in northern Virginia by Dominion Virginia 

Power. 
Cumulative Impacts 

Proposed on-post cumulative development projects 

Map 

number Project title 

Size 

(ft2

) 

1 Woodlawn Connector Road n/a

2 Religious Education Center 18,000

3 Physical Fitness Center (Troop Cantonment Area) 150,800

4 Marina Modernization and Dogue Creek Dredging 6,900

5 Expand Main Post Library 24,500

6 Expand Recreation Center 10,500

7 Administrative Building PEO Soldier 68,000

8 JPRA Renovation/Addition (Bldg 358) 87,742

9 Vet Clinic Addition 9,950

10 Museum Support Center (MSC) 124,800

11 Installation Industrial Support Center 53,000

12 Battalion Headquarters for 249th Engineer Battalion 14,600

13 Shoppette with Gas, Burger King, Car Wash (South Post) 7,200

14 Expand Arts/Craft/Auto 13,000

15 D.C. National Guard (DCNG) Resources Training Center 20,000

16 DLA Receiving and Screening Facility 14,800

17 Golf Clubhouse/Cart Storage < 5,000

18 Addition to MP Station < 5,000

19 Potomac Heritage National Scenic Trail n/a

20 Soldier Support Center 68,700

21 Expand Bowling Center 11,550

22 South Post Fitness Facility & Multipurpose Fields 95,300

23 Replace South Post Fire Station 17,800

24 Construct Shoppette (EPG) 17,400

25 Physical Fitness Center (EPG) 70,800

26 Museum of the U.S. Army Alternative Locations: 

(A) North Post; (B) Pence Gate 300,300

27 DCEETA Remote Delivery Facility 99,000

28 Davison Army Airfield Flight Control Tower n/a

29 Operations Security Evaluation Group Training Facility 130,000

30 Fairfax County Parkway Extension n/a

31 Information Dominance Center 300,000

32 PX Expansion 186,300
Cumulative Impacts 

Proposed off-post development projects 

Map ID Project name Total acres

1 West Springfield Business Centre Site 5 Parking Additional 5.1

2 West Springfield Business Centre Site 5 Parking Additional 6.3

3 Accotink Stream Valley Trail (Revitalization Area) 9.1

4 Accotink Park 4.8

5 PBS 4.3

6 Saint John's Lutheran Church 3.8

7 Anne Ly Estate 2 2.6

8 Northampton (formerly Overbrook) 18.3

9 Crown Royal Gate 1.3

10 Cox Communications Southeast Hub Site 0.9

11 Highlands Estates 3.9

12 Lakewood Hills Section 10 Phase 2 17.0

13 Stream Valley Estates 7.3

14 VA Tire and Auto Repair 0.4

15 Mohtaram Mozafari Residence 1.6

16 Hooes Road Park 21.4

17 Metro Park Phase Seven 3.5

18 Kingstowne Section 36A 4.5

19 Windsor Knoll 9.0

20 Provident Bank 1.1

21 Beacon Mall Prop Drive-Thru Bank and Fast Food 2.0

22 Del Ray Glass 2.0

23 Commerce Bank Beacon Hill Groveton 1.6

24 Cifuentes Property PCLS 15 and 15A 8.6

25 Mazzello Cove 3.1

26 Roxbury Mews 1.8

27 Hopkins House 1.8

28 Malcolm at Ox Road 20.2

29 Laurel Hill Golf Course Expansion 348.6

30 Telegraph Road Warehouse 5.7

31 The Fairfax Building Addition 5.2

32 Jett Mechanical 8753 Richmond Highway 2.9

33 Mount Vernon Country Club Golf Course Improvements 127.7

34 St. James Episcopal Church 5.1

35 Furnace Road Recycling Facility 9.7

36 Rock Stone and Sand Yard Inc. 1.6

37 Gunston Commerce Center Building 1 1.9

38 Lot 16 Shell Oil Park 2.8

39 Bren Mar IV 5.7

40 Residence Inn Springfield 1.3

41 Woodland Crest 2.8
Map ID Project name Total acres

42 Verizon addition to Franconia Central Office 2.0

43 Apple Federal Credit Union 1.0

44 Kendrick 3.0

45 Groveton Heights 4.6

46 Groveton Phase II 11.6

47 K and M Shopping Center 0.7

48 Beacon Mall Silver Dinner 1.1

49 Mount Calvary Baptist Church 1.5

50 7706 Gambrill Road 1.2

51 Covington Woods addition 1.9

52 Giant #149 Saratoga Shopping Center 11.3

53 Sabina Estates 3.6

54 8404 Heller Road Sanitary Sewer Service 0.0

55 UPS in Newington 21.2

56 Mount Vernon Gateway 17.0

57 Master Roofing and Siding Inc. 8463 Richmond HY 1.2

58 Laurel Overlook (Formerly Hooes Road-Blackstone) 10.1

59 Spring Hill Senior Campus Senior Housing Building 46.8

60 Hoa Nghiem Pagoda 1.3

61 Ferry Landing Preserve 5.4

62 Cranford at Gunston Cove 8.0

63 Gunston Commerce Center Land Bay D 23.7

64 Bob Evans Restaurant Old Keene Mill Road 1.6

65 Wheeler Property 0.8

66 Spicer Center 0.9

67 Rose Hill Reserve 1 23.7

68 Rose Hill Reserve 2 23.7

69 South Run Recreational Center Fitness Center Additional 182.3

70 Springfield Metro Center II Road Improvements 4.9

71 Beacon Mall Famous Daves 1.1

72 Silverbrook Farms Lot 7 1.0

73 Loyal Order of The Moose Franconia Lodge 646 Inc. 6.2

74 Hilltop Reclamation Project (3365-LF-01, for bond only) 1.0

75 8214 and 8218 Richmond Highway 1.2

76 Lofty Oaks Place Lots 41A 41B 41C 1.6

77 Inova Mount Vernon 1.7

78 Lorton Work House 52.1

79 AAA Vehicle Maintenance Facility 5.3

80 Commonwealth Construction Management Inc. 2.7

81 Halley Farm Subdivision 3.7

82 Lorton Debris Land Fill (1883-LF-002-2, for bond only) 1.0

83 Cardinal Estates 1.8

84 Old Keene Mill Professional Offices 2.3
Map ID Project name Total acres

85 Parcel 8A Shell Oil Park 6.0

86 Ricks Carpet and Floors 1.2

87 Talbert Subdivision 1.2

88 BB+T Bank Drive-thru Addition- Manchester Lakes SC 1.3

89 Wal-Mart Store #2194 Kingstowne Centre 14.8

90 First Baptist Church of Kingstowne 2.0

91 Hayfield Animal Hospital 1.5

92 Sherwood Hall Library 4.4

93 New Hope Church 8.9

94 Best Foods Inc 9525 Gunston Cove Road 5.6

95 Adkins Property 25.7

96 Epiphany Lutheran Church 3.0

97 Meadowbrook Drive Property 2.2

98 Backlick Plaza 7.8

99 6715 Commerce Street 4.4

100 Highgrove Estates Section 5 26.9

101 Jefferson at Sullivan Place 17.2

102 Devers Property 2.1

103 LDS Church Franconia Ward 7.6

104 Lakewood Hills Sect. 10 Phase I 35.1

105 Fairfax Park 5.3

106 Echo Inc. 0.9

107 VW Springfield 6.8

108 2nd Park Structure at Frank-Springfield Metro Station 0.0

109 Calvary Road Baptist Church Expansion 8.1

110 Metro Park Phase Six 11.2

111 Gayfields Road 13.9

112 Silver Lake IHOP Restaurant 1.1

113 Groveton Woods 11.6

114 Holly Acres 8.9

115 Shurgard Mount Vernon 5.3

116 Mount Vernon Square Shopping Center 8.7

117 Chilis Beacon Hill 6601 Richmond Highway 1.9

118 Chapel Bridge Estates 6.6

119 St. Raymond Penafort Church 9.9

120 Harvester Presbyterian Church 3.9

121 Covington Woods 4.7

122 Monacan Estates 3.6

123 Rolling Oaks 8.0

124 Hunter Plaza, Phase One 0.8

125 Hunter Plaza Phase 2 1.3

126 Tavares/Allen Property 11.4

127 Island Creek Elementary School 18.1
Map ID Project name Total acres

128 U-Haul Retail Center 8297 Terminal Road 2.5

129 Crown Center 13.2

130 M and S Holdings LLC (formerly Millers Office Prod.) 11.4

131 8501 Backlick Road (formerly 8521) 4.6

132 Piney Glen 9.3

133 Ashby Heights 6.1

134 Federal Reality Investment/South Valley Shop Ctr. 24.1

135 Woodlands, The 4.0

136 Evergreen Farm 2.5

137 Cecil Case Estates 8.1

138 Gallahan Property 3.4

139 Vernon Heights 7.7

140 Remington Place (formerly Cooke Property) 14.4

141 Cooke Property 10.3

142 Davison Woods 5.1

143 Nirvana Palace 30.3

144 Occoquan Overlook 100.6

145 Occoquan Park 15.8

146 Laurel Hill Land Bay A Section 1 24.5

147 Laurel Hill South Sec 1 Landbay C 24.7

148 Laurel Hill North 23.2

149 Laurel Hill South Landbay D Section 1 22.7

150 Laurel Hill South Landbay D Section 2 33.2

151 Laurel Hill South Landbays E and F, Section 1 48.0

152 Laurel Hill South Landbay E and F Section 2 33.1

153 South County High School 69.4

154 Laurel Hill Elementary School 18.5

155 Spring Hill Senior Campus 59.7

156 Laurel Hill Recreation Center 2.5

157 Pohick Road Self Storage Facility 3.9

158 Lorton Town Center Landbay D/F 18.9

159 Meeker Property 5.6

160 Laurel Ridge Crossing (formerly Pulte Plaskett Lane) 4.9

161 Lorton Town Center Landbay G 13.1

162 Grace Bible Church 3.5

163 Lorton Town Center Landbay C 3.0

164 Lorton Town Center Landbay "B-2" 1.7

165 Lorton Valley Recreation Center 0.5

166 Gunston Commons Townhouses 3.1

167 Lorton Station South Section 6 4.7

168 Barnes Property 8.7

169 Lorton Station School 12.8

170 Gunston Corner Restaurant 1.1
Map ID Project name Total acres

171 Lorton Station South Section 7 20.2

172 Cook Inlet Residential Section Three 60.6

173 Mt. Vernon Orientation Center Education Center and Museum 8.4

174 Gunston Cove Business Center 8.8

175 Evans Property 6.2

176 Gunston Square Section 2 Parcel D 0.9

177 Gunston Commerce Center Land Bay C 39.9

178 Gunston Commerce Center Land Bay B 11.7

179 Gunston Commerce Center Building 2 LB A 10.2

180 Gunston Center 14.1

181 Mid-Town Springfield Development (mixed use) 9.5

182 Springfield Mall Expansion 82.0

183 Mixed Use (Office, Hotel, Retail) 5.0

184 Mixed Use (Residential, Office, Retail, Hotel) 8.5

185 Mixed Use (Residential, Office, Recreation/Open Space, Retail) 160.5

186 Mixed Use (Office, Industrial) 117.8

187 Mixed Use (Office, Retail) 6.0
Public Meeting Attendees

April 2007
Elected Officials
Federal Officials



State Officials


Local Officials

State Agency Representatives




Local Agency Representatives











Media

Citizens