alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

Editorial Note on Part 360
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 360 appear at 79 FR 8860, Feb. 14, 2014.

§ 360.1 Official agencies. ( a ) The Bureau of the Fiscal Service of the Department of the Treasury is responsible for administering the Savings Bonds Program. Authority to process transactions has been delegated to the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis and may be delegated to other Federal Reserve Banks and Branches as fiscal agents of the United States. The Federal Reserve Banks and Branches, and their authority to process transactions as fiscal agents of the United States, are subject to change as determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, or his or her designee.
( b ) Information about savings bonds and savings bond transactions, including savings bond transaction forms and email contact information, is available through the Bureau of the Fiscal Service's Web site at *http://www.treasurydirect.gov .* Communications concerning transactions and requests for forms may also be addressed to: ( 1 ) The Bureau of the Fiscal Service, P.O. Box 7012, Parkersburg, WV 26106-7012; or
( 2 ) The Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Treasury Retail Securities Site, P.O. Box 214, Minneapolis, MN 55480-0214.
( c ) Notices and documents must be filed with the agencies referred to in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section and as indicated in the regulations in this part.
[63 FR 38049, July 14, 1998, as amended at 79 FR 8859, Feb. 14, 2014]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 28, 2015

d0420

Order 

Clerk

April 28, 2015

149308(14)

ALLAN FALK,

Plaintiff,

v SC: 149308

AGC: 0064-13

0323-13

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION,

Defendant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for review of taxation of costs is GRANTED in 

part, pursuant to MCL 600.2445(2), MCR 7.219, and MCR 7.318. In light of the unusual 

circumstances of this case, in which the Court directed the Attorney Grievance 

Commission to follow the procedures set forth in MCR 9.131, we conclude that the 

plaintiff improved his position by filing the motion to amend the complaint for 

superintending control. The Clerk is thus directed to issue a letter taxing costs of $37.50 

in favor of the plaintiff, which is one-half of the motion filing fee.
HomeBiographies...Dan Cisek

# 				Dan Cisek			

															Russian Language Spokesperson						Office of International Media Engagement												

				September 8, 2023 -									Present							

Daniel is currently the State Department’s Russian-Language Spokesperson and Deputy Director of the Brussels Media Hub. He has served previously at U.S. embassies in Moscow, Kyiv (twice), Berlin, Islamabad, and the U.S. Consulate in Mumbai. Prior to entering the Foreign Service, Daniel worked as a policy advisor in the U.S. Senate and as a print journalist. He holds an M.A. in Post-Soviet Politics and International Relations from Indiana University and a B.A. in History and Political Science from Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois, near his hometown of Chicago. In addition to Russian, he speaks German and basic French.

Tags

Office of International Media EngagementState Department Official

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Assistant Secretary Mallory Stewart Travels to Florida, February 14-15

# 									Assistant Secretary Mallory Stewart Travels to Florida, February 14-15							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

February 13, 2023

Assistant Secretary of State for Arms Control, Verification and Compliance Mallory Stewart will travel to Florida, from February 14-15, 2023, to discuss issues related to arms control treaty implementation and verification and engage with academia.

On February 14, the Assistant Secretary will meet with the leadership and staff of the Air Force Technical Applications Center at Patrick Space Force Base, Florida to exchange views related to nuclear explosion monitoring and other research and development initiatives.

On February 15, the Assistant Secretary will meet with various United States Space Force organizations at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station on issues related to space security.  She will also deliver remarks to students and faculty of the Florida Institute of Technology on the critical role academia plays in advancing our national security goals.

Tags

Arms Control and NonproliferationBureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and StabilityFloridaNuclear EnergyOffice of Public LiaisonOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial Domestic Travel

Back to Top
#### § 526.409 Credit extended and cards issued by financial institutions to a person whose property and interests in property are blocked.

The prohibition in § 526.201 on dealing in property subject to that section prohibits U.S. financial institutions from performing under any existing credit agreements, including charge cards, debit cards, or other credit facilities issued by a financial institution to a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 526.201.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2556

To redesignate the Federal building located at 345 Middlefield Road in

Menlo Park, California, and known as the Earth Sciences and Library

Building, as the ‘‘Vincent E. McKelvey Federal Building’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 30, 1995

Ms. ESHOO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To redesignate the Federal building located at 345 Middlefield Road in Menlo Park, California, and known as

the Earth Sciences and Library Building, as the ‘‘Vincent E. McKelvey Federal Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

4 The Federal building located at 345 Middlefield

5 Road, in Menlo Park, California, and known as the Earth

6 Sciences and Library Building, shall be known and des7 ignated as the ‘‘Vincent E. McKelvey Federal Building’’.
2

•HR 2556 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

4 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

5 a reference to the ‘‘Vincent E. McKelvey Federal Build6 ing’’.

Æ
HomeBiographies...Amy Holman

# 				Amy Holman			

															Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary 						Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs												

				December 4, 2023 -									Present							

Amy Holman, a career member of the Senior Foreign Service with the rank of Minister Counselor, began her assignment as Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary in the Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs in December 2023. Previously she was a Deputy Assistant Secretary in the Bureau of African Affairs handling Central Africa and Africa-China issues.

Other assignments include Deputy Chief of Mission at the U.S. Embassy in Dakar and Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary and Office Director in the Trade Policy and Programs division of the Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs. Amy also served in Kabul, Islamabad, Brussels, Lima, Lagos, and Caracas.

She holds a master’s degree from the School of International and Public Affairs at Columbia University, a B.A. from the University of Michigan, and a B.A. from L’Institut d’Etudes Politiques at the Université de Strasbourg, France. She and her fiancé Roberto Garcia Saltos share two sons and two daughters. She enjoys classical piano, Zumba, and tennis.

Back to Top
www.gpo.gov

### §1621v. Office of Indian Women's Health Care

There is established within the Service an Office of Indian Women's Health Care to oversee efforts of the Service to monitor and improve the quality of health care for Indian women of all ages through the planning and delivery of programs administered by the Service, in order to improve and enhance the treatment models of care for Indian women.

(Pub. L. 94–437, title II, §223, as added Pub. L. 102–573, title II, §216, Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4559.)
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

###### Editorial Note on Part 357

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 357 appear at 70 FR 57431, Sept. 30, 2005.

#### § 357.30 Cases of delay or suspension of payment.

If evidence required by the Department in support of a transaction request is not received by the Department at least ten (10) business days before the maturity date of the security, or if payment at maturity has been suspended pursuant to 31 CFR 370.10, in cases of reinvestment, the Department will redeem the security and hold the redemption proceeds in the same form of registration as the security redeemed, pending further disposition. No other interest shall accrue or be paid on such proceeds after the security is redeemed.

[64 FR 40487, July 26, 1999]
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2011 - 0479 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2010 -NM - 154 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Managed Pension Assets Partnership 1989-2, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of
operations  contained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended  September 30, 1998
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         27,503
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  29,706
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               57,209
<PP&E>                                         1,418,266
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,227,994)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 247,481
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,159
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     244,322
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   247,481
<SALES>                                        42,502
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               44,742
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  24,693<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (763)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (763)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (763)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>

        

</TABLE>
§ 510.312 Information or informational materials. ( a ) ( 1 ) The term *information or informational materials* includes publications, films, posters, phonograph records, photographs, microfilms, microfiche, tapes, compact disks, CD ROMs, artworks, and news wire feeds.
( 2 ) To be considered information or informational materials, artworks must be classified under heading 9701, 9702, or 9703 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States.
( b ) The term *information or informational materials,* with respect to exports, does not include items: ( 1 ) That were, as of April 30, 1994, or that thereafter become, controlled for export pursuant to section 5 of the Export Administration Act of 1979, 50 U.S.C. App. 2401-2420 (1979) (EAA), or section 6 of the EAA to the extent that such controls promote the nonproliferation or antiterrorism policies of the United States; or
( 2 ) With respect to which acts are prohibited by 18 U.S.C. chapter 37.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Aleksey Navalny Unjustly Convicted Again

# 									Aleksey Navalny Unjustly Convicted Again							

Press Statement

Ned Price, Department Spokesperson

March 22, 2022

We condemn Russian authorities’ politically-motivated conviction and sentencing of opposition leader Aleksey Navalny on additional spurious charges to nine more years in a high security prison. This outlandish prison term is a continuation of the Kremlin’s years-long assault on Navalny and on his movement for government transparency and accountability. Of course, Navalny’s true crime in the eyes of the Kremlin is his work as an anti-corruption activist and opposition politician, for which he and his associates have been branded “extremists” by Russian authorities.

Despite his near-fatal poisoning with a nerve agent in 2020 by Russia’s security services and his unjust imprisonment since January 2020, Navalny has continued to speak out against the Kremlin’s suppression of freedom of expression in Russia, and the increasing restrictions on the ability of Russia’s citizens to access information and communicate freely with each other and the outside world. This campaign has intensified as the Kremlin seeks to hide the truth of its brutal war against Ukraine from its own people. More than 15,000 citizens of Russia have been detained for taking part in anti-war protests since February 24. Russia’s communications authority has blocked access to nearly all independent news outlets and several social media platforms, and threatened journalists and average citizens alike with jail time if they dare to discuss the war against Ukraine using anything other than Kremlin-approved euphemisms.

We urge the Russian Federation to immediately and unconditionally release Aleksey Navalny and to end its campaign against his organizations and associates. Navalny’s case is sadly one of many the Kremlin continues to brazenly pursue as it systematically ignores the constitutional rights of the Russian people and its international commitments to respect and ensure human rights and fundamental freedoms. Now more than ever, the people of Russia must be able to hear voices of courage and integrity that tell the truth about the Kremlin’s wrongdoing at home and abroad.

Tags

Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsHuman RightsOffice of the SpokespersonRussia

## Related Articles

-  											 													Aleksey Navalny Unjustly Convicted Again			
Read more
 

Back to Top
40165.

#### COTTINGHAM et al. v. WELLS.

Eberhardt, Judge.

Plaintiff sued defendant beauty shop operators to recover damages for the improper application of eyebrow dye. The defendants’ agents allegedly allowed an excessive amount of the dyeing solution to get in plaintiff’s eyes, and run down the side of her face, allowed it to remain on her face too long, and further injured plaintiff in trying to remove the dye. On the trial of the case, the jury found for plaintiff. Defendants moved for a nonsuit, judgment notwithstanding the verdict and new trial, all of which were overruled. *Held:*

The basis of defendant’s motions was that beauty shop operators, being licensed under *Code Ann.*§ 84-401 et seq., should be judged by a standard of care common to other beauty shop operators, and in a manner similar to that applied to the medical profession. While there is some foreign authority to *41this effect, see Annot. 14 ALR2d 860, 866, there are no Georgia cases raising this issue.

Decided June 17, 1963.

*Anthony D. Binaldo, Lucio L. Russo,*for plaintiffs in error.

*James 0. Coggins,*contra.

To hold that beauty shop operators are entitled to the same measure of protection in this area as the medical profession requires the finding of a degree of similarity between them which we do not think exists. But, even if it did, the case here involves “negligence in the act of administering . . . treating” and, therefore “negligence and proximate cause may be proved by nonexpert witnesses.” *Caldwell v. Knight,*92 Ga. App. 747 (2b) (89 SE2d 900). Though the verdict was not demanded, there was evidence to support it.

The trial court properly overruled all of defendants’ motions.

No error appearing, the judgment is

*Affirmed.*

*Felton, C. J., and Bussell, J., concur.*
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

###### Editorial Note on Part 353

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 353 appear at 79 FR 8859, Feb. 14, 2014.

#### § 353.80 Payment to corporations or unincorporated associations.

A bond registered in the name of a private corporation or an unincorporated association will be paid to the corporation or unincorporated association upon a request for payment on its behalf by an authorized officer. The signature to the request should be in the form, for example, “The Jones Coal Company, a corporation, by John Jones, President”, or “The Lotus Club, an unincorporated association, by William A. Smith, Treasurer”. A request for payment so signed and certified will ordinarily be accepted without further evidence of the officer's authority.
AFFIDAVIT IN ATTACHMENT EXECUTED BEFORE PLAINTIFF’S ATTORNEY.

Court of Appeals for Hamilton County.

#### Joslin-Schmidt Co. v. Joseph F. Herrmann.

Decided, March 9, 1916.

*Attachment and Garnishment*— Affidavit *Made Before Plaintiff’s Attorney as Notary*— Not *Given Life by Substituting the Name of Another Attorney.*

The rule that an affidavit in attachment can not be made before a notary public who is the attorney - for one of the parties -to the action has reference to the status of the parties at the time the affidavit is made, and where the affidavit is made before plaintiff’s attorney the substitution thereafter of the name of another attorney does not give life to the action as against a motion to discharge the attachment.

*George 8. Baily*and *L. D. Oliver,*for plaintiff in error.

*Cobb, Howard & Bailey,*contra.

*349Merriman, J.

The record shows that Mr. D. -S. Oliver had been the attorney for the plaintiff for many years, having general charge of all its legal matters. -Mr. Oliver had been - consulted about bringing this suit, prepared the necessary papers, signed the petition as attorney for the plaintiff, and as a notary public swore Mr. Schmidt, treasurer of - the plaintiff company, to the affidavit in attachment. When Mr. Oliver attempted to file the petition and affidavit in the court of common pleas the clerk suggested that he was disqualified from acting as both attorney ■and notary, and he thereupon substituted the name of his brother, L. D. Oliver, as attorney, and filed the papers.

The court of common pleas discharged the attachment, and plaintiff prosecutes error'to this court.-

In *Leavitt*v. *Rosenberg,*83 Ohio St., 230, the court'held':

> ■“An affidavit in attachment can not be made before a notary 'public who is the attorney for one of the parties to-the action.”

Mr. Oliver was the attorney for the plaintiff company at the time the affidavit in attachment was made by its treasurer, Mir. Schmidt, and he acted as the attorney in preparing the petition and affidavit. ■

We think the reason for the rule, as laid down In *Ward*v. *Ward,*20 C. C., 136, and *Leavitt*v. *Rosenberg, supra,*contemplates the status of the parties at the time the affidavit is made.

The affidavit in question, therefore, never had legal existence, and no subsequent action by Mr. Oliver could give it life.

The judgment of the court of common pleas is affirmed.

Sayre, J., and Walters, J., concur.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 351.64 What is the issue date of a book-entry Series EE savings bond?

The issue date of a book-entry Series EE savings bond is the first day of the month in which the security posts to the current holdings of the account owner.

[69 FR 50308, Aug. 16, 2004]