alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

Editorial Note on Part 363
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 363 appear at 70 FR 57433, Sept. 30, 2005, 70 FR 57442, Sept. 30, 2005, and 75 FR 70815, Nov. 19, 2010.

§ 363.96 What do I need to know if I initially purchase a bond as a gift? ( a ) An entity may not purchase a gift savings bond.
( b ) The gift bond will be registered in the name of the recipient(s). The registration is irrevocable with regard to the owner named on the gift bond.
( c ) You must provide the SSN of the recipient.
( d ) You may deliver the bond upon purchase, or you may hold the bond in your TreasuryDirect ® account until you are ready to deliver the bond to the owner named on the gift bond.
( e ) If the purchaser dies before delivering a gift bond to the recipient, the bond belongs to the owner named on the gift bond, notwithstanding any testamentary attempts to the contrary by the purchaser, or any state law to the contrary. We will hold the bond until we receive instructions from the owner named on the gift bond.
[67 FR 64286, Oct. 17, 2002, as amended at 69 FR 2508, Jan. 16, 2004; 74 FR 19419, Apr. 29, 2009]
**Exhibit
      32.2**








**CERTIFICATION**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of JACOBS FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended February 29, 2008 (the “Report")
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Robert L. Neal, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)  The
      Company’s Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
                April 21, 2008/s/Robert
                L. NealRobert
                L. Neal, Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,317
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,920
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (94)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         109,563
<DEPRECIATION>                                (72,193)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  55,833
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         19,355
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,331
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    55,833
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,400
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,242
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    25
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 681
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,854
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,854
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,854
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.29


</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.3


Employment Agreement 


Between David Xu and SGOCO Group, Ltd.


 





 



    	1



    	 



    
 





 



    	2



    	 



    
 





 



    	3
§ 525.101 Relation of this part to other laws and regulations. This part is separate from, and independent of, the other parts of this chapter, with the exception of part 501 of this chapter, the recordkeeping and reporting requirements and license application and other procedures of which apply to this part. Actions taken pursuant to part 501 of this chapter with respect to the prohibitions contained in this part are considered actions taken pursuant to this part. Differing foreign policy and national security circumstances may result in differing interpretations of similar language among the parts of this chapter. No license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to those other parts authorizes any transaction prohibited by this part. No license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to any other provision of law or regulation authorizes any transaction prohibited by this part. No license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to this part relieves the involved parties from complying with any other applicable laws or regulations. Note 1 to § 525.101 .
This part has been published in abbreviated form for the purpose of providing immediate guidance to the public. OFAC intends to supplement this part with a more comprehensive set of regulations, which may include additional interpretive and definitional guidance, general licenses, and other regulatory provisions.
§ 13.6 Reimbursement of State and local governments. ( a ) State and local governments providing services, personnel, equipment, or facilities to the affected metropolitan area pursuant to § 13.5 may forward to the Assistant Secretary a bill for reimbursement for the personnel, equipment, facilities, and services utilized in meeting the extraordinary protective need. The bill shall be in accordance with the format in appendix II of this part. The Assistant Secretary will reimburse only those costs directly related to the extraordinary protective need including personnel and equipment costs resulting from assignments made to assist in providing security at an otherwise qualified location in connection with the arrival, departure, or during the visit of a foreign dignitary. Reimbursable costs will also include the costs for establishing both fixed posts at a qualified location and protective perimeters outside of a qualified location when it is clearly established to the satisfaction of the Assistant Secretary that such assignments were necessary to assure the safety of the qualified location. Overhead and administrative costs associated with an extraordinary protective need are reimbursable as either a flat 18 percent of the total extraordinary protective need costs, or, if such costs can be clearly segregated from routine police costs, on a dollar-for-dollar basis. The jurisdiction seeking such reimbursement may select either method but may not use both. For the purposes of reimbursement the Assistant Secretary will, in all cases, determine when the extraordinary protective need began and terminated.
[45 FR 30622, May 9, 1980]
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 340.2 Denominations and exchanges.

Bearer bonds with interest coupons attached, and bonds registered as to principal and interest, will be available in denominations of $500, $1,000, $5,000, $10,000, $100,000, and $1,000,000. Provisions will be made for the interchange of bonds of different denominations and of bearer and registered bonds, and for the transfer of registered bonds.
Photo 1

- RSC01L (EC1)

Photo 2 RSC01M (EC1)

Photo 3 RSC01U (EC1)

Photo 4

– RSC01L (EC4)Photo 5 RSC01M (EC4)

Photo 6

– RSC01U (EC4)

Photo 7

– WQSC01 (LB4)Photo 8

– ECSC01/WQSC02

Photo 9

– WQTC01

Photo 10

– WQTC01

- Cons tructionPhoto 11

– WQTC01

– Finished Channel

Photo 12

– ECTC02

- Pool

Photo 13

– ECTC02

– Upstream

Photo 14

– ECTC02

– DownstreamPhoto 15

– ECTC02

– Winter 2001

Photo 16

– ECTC02

– Summer 2002

Photo 17

– ECTC02

– Summer 2002Photo 18

– ECTC03

– Fall 2001

Photo 19

– ECTC03

– Fall 2002

Photo 20

- WQTC02/ECTC04 (LB2)

Photo 21

– WQTC02/ECTC04 (LB4)Photo 22

– ECTC05/WQTC03

– Summer/Flood

Photo 23

– ECTC05/WQTC03

– Summer/Dry

Photo 24

– ECTC05/WQTC03

– Winter

Photo 25

– WQTC04/ECTC06

– Winter 2001/2002Photo 26

– WQTC04/ECTC06

– Summer 2002

Photo 27

- WQTC04/ECTC06

– Pool

Photo 28

– WQTC06Photo 29

– WQTC06

Photo 30

– WQTC06

– Summer 2002

Photo 31

– WQTC07Photo 32

– WQBL01

Photo 33

– WQTC05/ECTC07

– LB4

Photo 34

– WQTC05/ECTC07

– LB1Photo 35

– WQBC06

Photo 36

– WQBC01

Photo 37

– WQBC02Photo 38

– WQBC03

Photo 39

– WQBC07

Photo 40

– WQBC05/ECBC04Photo 41

- ECBC01 Upstream

Photo 42

– ECBC01

– Pool

Photo 43

– WQBC04/ECBC02Photo 44

– ECBC03 Upper Pool

Photo 45

– ECBC03 (EC3)

Photo 46

– ECBC03 (EC4)
§ 1030.540 Voluntary information sharing among financial institutions. ( a ) Refer to § 1010.540 of this chapter.
( b ) [Reserved]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2556 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2556

To redesignate the Federal building located at 345 Middlefield Road in 
  Menlo Park, California, and known as the Earth Sciences and Library 
       Building, as the ``Vincent E. McKelvey Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 30, 1995

  Ms. Eshoo introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To redesignate the Federal building located at 345 Middlefield Road in 
  Menlo Park, California, and known as the Earth Sciences and Library 
       Building, as the ``Vincent E. McKelvey Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 345 Middlefield Road, in Menlo 
Park, California, and known as the Earth Sciences and Library Building, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Vincent E. McKelvey Federal 
Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Vincent E. 
McKelvey Federal Building''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Managed Pension Assets Partnership 1989-C, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of
operations  contained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended March 31, 1999 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         90,181
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  41,983
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               132,164
<PP&E>                                         2,319,853
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,105,949)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 346,068
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,870
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     339,198
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   346,068
<SALES>                                        9,467
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               10,753
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  7,998<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (12,466)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (12,466)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (12,466)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
§ 510.206 Prohibited exportation or reexportation of goods, services, or technology to North Korea. ( a ) The exportation or reexportation, directly or indirectly, from the United States, or by a U.S. person, wherever located, of any goods, services, or technology to North Korea is prohibited.
( b ) The prohibitions in this section apply except to the extent provided in regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this part or pursuant to the export control authorities implemented by the U.S. Department of Commerce, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted prior to the effective date.
40355.

#### WHITING v. THE STATE.

Frankum, Judge.

The defendant was convicted of larceny from the house under an indictment charging him with burglary and larceny from the house. His motion for new trial on the general grounds and on four special grounds was overruled, and he assigns error in this court on that judgment.

1. The case was not orally argued before this court. The plaintiff in error has in his brief expressly abandoned the general grounds of his motion for new trial. Special grounds 1, 3 and 4 are merely copied in the brief. This is not sufficient argument, and these grounds will be considered as abandoned also. *Bell v. Bell,*210 Ga. 295, 297 (5) (79 SE2d 524). See also *Henderson v. Lott,*163 Ga. 326, 328 (2) (136 SE 403); *Head v. Lee,*203 Ga. 191, 201 (5) (45 SE2d 666); *B-X Corp. v. Jeter,*210 Ga. 250 (4) (78 SE2d 790); *Lumbermen’s &c. Alliance v. Jessup,*100 Ga. App. 518, 533 (4) (112 SE2d 337).

2. Special ground 2 assigns error because the trial court erred in charging the jury that, if they found, in considering the evidence and the defendant’s statement, that any of the property alleged to have been taken was found recently thereafter in the possession of the defendant, they might give that circumstance such weight as they felt proper on the question of whether it established beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was the one who broke and entered the house, if they should find the house was broken and entered. The assignment of error is that the charge was not a complete and correct charge in that the judge should have charged in connection therewith the provisions of *Code*§ 38-109. “It has been repeatedly held by both this court and by the Supreme Court that an instruction correct in and of itself is not rendered erroneous by the mere failure of the trial court to give in connection therewith also another pertinent and legal instruction.” *Burton & Class v. Connell,*84 Ga. App. 106, 109 (2) (65 SE2d 620). See also *Jones v. State,*197 Ga. 604, 610 (30 SE2d 192); *Elliott v. Robinson,*198 Ga. 811 (5) (33 SE2d 95); *City of Decatur v. Robertson,*85 Ga. App. 747, 751 (5) (70 SE2d 135). Furthermore, nowhere in this ground is it alleged that the conviction of the defendant depended'wholly upon circumstantial evidence. If it did not so depend, then the failure to charge without request the *375provisions of that Code section was not error. *Johnson v. State,*40 Ga. App. 736 (4) (151 SE 405).

Decided September 24, 1963.

*D. L. Lomenick, Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*Earl B. Self, Solicitor General,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.*
OMISSION OF HOUSE NUMBER IN NOTICE OF SHERIFF’S SALE.

Court of Appeals for Hamilton County.

#### Joseph Griefenkamp v. Robert J. Cresap, William G. Meyer and the Durrell Realty Company.

Decided, May 25, 1915.

*Judicial Sales*— Sheriff’s *Sale Invalidated*— By *Omission to Give the Number of the House in Notice of Sale*— Section 11678.

Failure to give the house number in the notice of a judicial sale of improved property located within a municipality where house numbers have been assigned is an irregularity which invalidates the sale.

*C. W.*Balter, for plaintiff.

*W. G. Burrell,*W. *G. Meyer*and *T.*If. *Schmuclt,*contra.

Gorman, J.

This case is here on appeal from a decree of the common pleas court.

We are of the opinion that a decree should be entered in this court such as the one entered in the court of common pleas, upon the reasoning of the trial judge in the opinion announced by him; and for the further reason that the sale made under the proceedings to sell for the tax lien, was not in conformity with the provisions of Section 11678, which was in force at the time of the sale, 1905, and among other things provides:

> “All notices and advertisements for the sale of lands and tenements located in a city or village in this state, made by virtue of proceedings in a court of .record therein in addition to a description of such lands and .tenements, shall contain the street number or the building or buildings erected on the lands, or the ’street number of the lots offered for sale. If no such number exists then the notice or advertisement must contain the name of the street or road upon which such lands or tenements are located, together with the names of the streets or roads immediately north and south, or east and west of such lands and tenements, that cross or intersect the street or road upon which they are located.”

The advertisement made by the sheriff, in the case in which the premises were sold by him, No. 131768 court of common pleas, omitted entirely to give the house number upon the east twenty-five feet of lot No. 80, which was one of 'the lots *178sold in said proceedings and bought in by William O. Meyer. While it is true that the parties may have mistakenly believed that a vacant lot was being sold, nevertheless, as a matter of fact it was not a vacant'lot, but there was a substantial house thereon, and the failure to comply with this statute was such .an irregularity as would invalidate the same and warrant the court in setting it aside.

The defendant, William O. Meyer, under the provisions of Section 5767, General Code, is entitled to have refunded to him the amount of the purchase money with interest thereon, together with the taxes subsequently paid by him, and interest on the same from the dates of payment. This, we understand, is what the court below decree to him.

Jones (E. IT.), J., and Jones (Oliver B.), J., concur.
§ 536.702 Prepenalty notice. ( a ) *When required.* If the Director of the Office of Foreign Assets Control has reasonable cause to believe that there has occurred a violation of any provision of this part or a violation of the provisions of any license, ruling, regulation, order, direction or instruction issued by or pursuant to the direction or authorization of the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to this part or otherwise under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, and the Director determines that further proceedings are warranted, they shall issue to the person concerned a notice of their intent to impose a monetary penalty. The prepenalty notice may be issued whether or not another agency has taken any action with respect to this matter.
( b ) *Contents* — ( 1 ) *Facts of violation.* The prepenalty notice shall describe the violation, specify the laws and regulations allegedly violated, and state the amount of the proposed monetary penalty.
( 2 ) *Right to respond.* The prepenalty notice also shall inform the respondent of respondent's right to respond to the notice within 30 days of its mailing as to why a monetary penalty should not be imposed, or, if imposed, why it should be in a lesser amount than proposed.
[62 FR 9960, Mar. 5, 1997, as amended at 89 FR 15741, Mar. 5, 2024]
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40509 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JUAN MANUEL MACHADO-CARRIZALES, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas UDC No. L-96-CR-135-1

- - - - - - - - - - April 02, 1998 Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Juan Manuel Machado-Carrizales appeal his guilty-plea conviction to possession with intent to distribute approximately 377 pounds of marihuana and carrying a firearm during and in relation to a drug-trafficking crime. He contends that the district court failed to give him an opportunity to plead not guilty pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(e)(4) when it was unlikely that the district court would follow the sentencing recommendation in the plea agreement.No. 97-40509 -2-The precepts of Rule 11(e)(4) do not apply to MachadoCarrizales’ plea agreement, which was entered into pursuant to Rule 11(e)(1)(B). United States v. Babineau , 795 F.2d 518, 520 (5th Cir. 1986). This issue is without any arguable merit. The appeal is frivolous and is DISMISSED as such. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. APPEAL DISMISSED.