alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AAM-12-276-E May 31, 2012

Exemption No. 10549 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0304

Mr. David Mino

Tom Wood Aviation

9913 Willow View Road Fishers, IN 46038

Dear Mr. Mino:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated March 13, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Tom Wood Aviation for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Tom Wood Aviation, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Tom Wood Aviation.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs.2

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Tom Wood Aviation an exemption from 14 CFR part 120 to the extent necessary to allow Tom Wood Aviation, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program, subject to the conditions and limitations described below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of Tom Wood Aviation are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the Tom Wood Aviation part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on May 31, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/
James R. Fraser, M.D. Deputy Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure
HomeBiographies...Kerri Hannan

# 				Kerri Hannan			

															Deputy Assistant Secretary						Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs												

				October 18, 2021 -									Present							

Tags

Bureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsState Department Official

Back to Top
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 361.3 Shipping procedure.

Shipments of valuables shall be made so as to provide the greatest possible protection against risk of loss and destruction of, and damage to, valuables, in accordance with requirements prescribed by the consignors after notice to the Secretary.
585 P.2d 881

#### Thomas L. GRAHAM, Appellant, v. GOODYEAR AEROSPACE CORPORATION, ARIZONA DIVISION, Appellee.

No. 13775-PR.

Supreme Court of Arizona, In Banc.

Oct. 2, 1978.

Jerome & Gibson by Alan M. Schiffman, Phoenix, for appellant.

Snell & Wilmer by Daniel J. McAuliffe, Phoenix, for appellee.

STRUCKMEYER, Vice Chief Justice.

This action for breach of contract was dismissed in Superior Court. The Court of Appeals reversed. We granted review to settle an apparent conflict with *Haver v. Superior Court,*9 Ariz.App. 422, 453 P.2d 362 (1969). Opinion of the Court of Appeals, *Graham v. Goodyear Aerospace Corporation,*120 Ariz. 275, 585 P.2d 884 (App.1978) affirmed as here supplemented.

On October 2, 1975, appellant Thomas L. Graham filed a complaint asserting a breach of contract arising out of Goodyear Aerospace’s refusal to pay him disability benefits as provided by the collective bargaining agreements entered into by Goodyear and appellant’s union, the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, Aerospace Lodge No. 763. Before filing its answer, Goodyear filed a motion to dismiss. Since the motion to dismiss was supported by exhibits and an affidavit, it has been treated as a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 12(b), Rules of Civil Procedure, 16 A.R.S.

Prior to the ruling on the motion to dismiss, appellant submitted a motion to amend the complaint together with a proposed amended complaint. The amended complaint added appellant’s union as a party defendant. The Superior Court denied appellant’s motion to amend, and dismissed with prejudice his claim against Goodyear. *273It granted the motion to add as a party defendant the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers.

The Court of Appeals reversed as to Goodyear, holding that neither a motion to dismiss nor a motion for summary judgment is a responsive pleading within the meaning of Rule 15(a), Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, 16 A.R.S. We agree. To the extent that *Haver v. Superior Court,*supra, may suggest otherwise, it is overruled. Appellant, under Rule 15(a), was entitled as a matter of course to amend his complaint with respect to Goodyear.

Judgment of the Superior Court reversed.

CAMERON, C. J., and HAYS, HOLO-HAN and GORDON, JJ., concur.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases…Brunei National Day

# 											Brunei National Day									

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

February 22, 2024

On behalf of the people of the United States, congratulations to the people of Brunei Darussalam as you mark your 40th National Day on February 23.

The United States and Brunei have enjoyed a long-lasting and prosperous friendship since 1850 when we signed the Treaty of Peace, Friendship, Commerce, and Navigation. In the coming year, I look forward to broadening cooperation by promoting prosperity through economic diversification, supporting Brunei’s regional leadership on climate change, deepening our robust military partnership, and growing our strong people-to-people ties through our professional and educational exchanges.

I wish all the people of Brunei Darussalam joyful and peaceful celebrations as you come together to honor your national holiday.

Tags

BruneiBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1997 AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                            2845
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     3184
<ALLOWANCES>                                       280
<INVENTORY>                                        310
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  6270
<PP&E>                                            9452
<DEPRECIATION>                                    4653
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   12073
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             5075
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        967
<COMMON>                                          9289
<OTHER-SE>                                      (3863)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     12073
<SALES>                                             33
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  4121
<CGS>                                               24
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      870
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  3048
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (13)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    192
<INCOME-TAX>                                        77
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                115
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       115
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on July 6, 2009, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Information Card Foundation has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, ACSEL, Paris, France; and Kynetx, Lehi, UT have been added as parties to this venture. Also, Figlo, Capell a/d Yessel, The Netherlands has withdrawn as a party to this venture. In addition, Parity Communications, Inc. has changed its name to Azigo, Inc., Needham, MA.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Information Card Foundation intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On June 2, 2008, Information Card Foundation filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on July 16, 2008 (73 FR 40883).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on April 17, 2009. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on May 22, 2009 (74 FR 24037).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. E9-19884 Filed 8-20-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 255

AN ACT

To designate the Federal Justice Building in Miami, Florida,

as the ‘‘James Lawrence King Federal Justice Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Federal Justice Building located at 99 Northeast

5 Fourth Street in Miami, Florida, shall be known and des-
2

•HR 255 EH

1 ignated as the ‘‘James Lawrence King Federal Justice

2 Building’’.

3 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

4 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

5 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

6 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

7 a reference to the ‘‘James Lawrence King Federal Justice

8 Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives December 5,

1995.

Attest:

Clerk.
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 255

AN ACT

To designate the Federal Justice Building in

Federal Justice Building’’.Miami, Florida, as the ‘‘James Lawrence King
#### § 526.316 United States national.

The term *United States national* means a “national of the United States” as defined in 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(22) or 8 U.S.C. 1408, or a lawful permanent resident with significant ties to the United States.
Washington, DC - USA

Consumer Specialty Products Association

Balancing Functionality with Efficacy

Steven Bennett, Ph.D.

Senior Director of Scientific Affairs and Sustainability

July 29, 2014

Expert Public Workshop on Alternatives and Risk Reduction 

Approaches to Trichloroethylene (TCE) Use as a Degreaser
Consumer Specialty Products Association

• Over 240 companies in the manufacture, 

formulation, distribution and sale of $100 billion 

in product sales annually in the U.S.

• Household, Industrial & Institutional members

• Seven product divisions

– Aerosol

– Antimicrobial

– Air Care

– Cleaning Products

– Industrial & Automotive

– Pest Management

– Polishes and Floor Maintenance

Industrial
Information Needs

1. CSPA supports more robust reporting of chemical uses under 

TSCA

2. EPA’s work plan goals

– Identify potential consumer and worker exposures

– Understand critical safety considerations

3. Information provided was intended to:

– Ensure a more accurate understanding of uses 

– Assist EPA in refining their assessment

– Identify appropriate stewardship activities

– Clarify safety considerations (critical uses)
Usage of TCE as a Degreaser

• Limited use – Industrial

• Solvent degreaser 

– Large commercial/industrial settings

– Small commercial settings, i.e., small shops 

• Characteristics: Inflammability and 

effectiveness

– Water-based alternatives; electrical hazards

– Flammable alternatives; fire/explosive hazards
Stewardship Activities to Reduce Existing Exposure

• Restrict sales

– Commercial/Industrial supply chains

– Clearly and prominently labeled as “For Commercial Use 

Only”

• Specific “above and beyond” MSDS/SDS instructions 

– Comprehensive Hazard Identification

– Use of Personal Protection Equipment

– Air monitoring

– Warnings to fire-fighters about decomposition products
(logo)****CURCIO

+COHEN

 

 

**Report of Independent RegisteredPublic Accounting Firm**

 

Managing Member

Park Bridge Lender ServicesLLC

New York, NY

 

 

We have examinedmanagement’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Reporton Assessment of 2016 Compliance by Park Bridge Lender Services LLC withRegulation AB Servicing Criteria (“Management’s Report”),that Park Bridge Lender Services LLC (the “Company”) complied withthe servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securities andExchange Commission’s Regulation AB as of and for the year ended December31, 2016, excluding those criteria noted as not applicable (N/A) within ExhibitB to Management’s Report. The transactions covered by this report areonly those transactions processed by the Company in its capacity as trustadvisor or operating advisor for the asset backed securities transactions (the“Platform”) identified in Management’s Report. ReferenceExhibit A to Management’s Report for the transactions covered by thisexamination. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance withthe applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinionon management’s assertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicableservicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considerednecessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of a selectedsample of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whetherthe Company performed those selected activities in compliance with theapplicable servicing criteria during the specified period. Our procedures werelimited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by theCompany during the period covered by this report. Our examination was notdesigned to detect material noncompliance arising from errors that may haveoccurred prior to or subsequent to our tests, that may have affected theCompany’s servicing activities during the period covered by this report.We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’scompliance with the applicable servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementionedapplicable servicing criteria identified in Exhibit B to Management’sReport with respect to the transactions identified in Exhibit A toManagement’s Report as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, forthe Platform, is fairly stated in all material aspects.

 

 

/s/ Curcio & Cohen,CPA’s, P.C.

 

 

New York, NY

February 2, 2017

 

 

CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTSPC 7 PENN PLAZA, SUITE 1500 NEW YORK NY 10001

TEL: 212 557-9800  FAX:212 557 9819   WEBSITE: WWW.CWCCPAFIRM.COM
HomeBiographies...Mira K. Resnick

# 				Mira K. Resnick			

															Deputy Assistant Secretary for Regional Security						Bureau of Political-Military Affairs												

				January 21, 2021 -									Present							

Tags

Bureau of Political-Military AffairsState Department Official

Back to Top
**Exhibit 32.01**

 

**Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes—Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I,Marcel Martin, the Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer of HaynesInternational, Inc., certify that (i) the quarterly report onForm 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of HaynesInternational, Inc. as of the dates and for the periods set forth therein.

 
|   | /s/  Marcel Martin                                   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Marcel  Martin                                       |
|   | *Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer* |
|   |                                                 |
|   | August 5, 2010                                  |
|   | Date                                                 |

 

I,Mark Comerford, the President and Chief Executive Officer of HaynesInternational, Inc., certify that (i) the quarterly report onForm 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Haynes International, Inc.as of the dates and for the periods set forth therein.

 
|   | /s/  Mark Comerford                     |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|   | Mark  Comerford                         |
|   | *President and Chief Executive Officer* |
|   |                                    |
|   | August 5, 2010                     |
|   | Date                                    |

 

1

----
§ 551.204 Expenses of maintaining blocked tangible property; liquidation of blocked property. ( a ) Except as otherwise authorized, and notwithstanding the existence of any rights or obligations conferred or imposed by any international agreement or contract entered into or any license or permit granted prior to the effective date, all expenses incident to the maintenance of tangible property blocked pursuant to § 551.201 shall be the responsibility of the owners or operators of such property, which expenses shall not be met from blocked funds.
( b ) Property blocked pursuant to § 551.201 may, in the discretion of OFAC, be sold or liquidated and the net proceeds placed in a blocked interest-bearing account in the name of the owner of the property.
SERVED: JUNE 1, 2015 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

PROFESSIONAL FLIGHT TRANSPORT, INC. 

DOCKET NO. FAA-2015-0638 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 201480190149) has been assigned to 

Administrative Law Judge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

persons on the attached Service List. 

Ronnie A. Yoder / 

Chief Administrative La~dge 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S. W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

ONE COPY 

Docket No. F AA-2015-0638 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

Professional Flight Transport, Inc., Respondent 

DBA Windsor Jet Management 

Mark B. Goldstein, Respondent's Counsel 

2700 N. Military Trail, Suite 130 

Lilley James, Agent for Service 

Executive Airport Business Center 

1835 S. Perimeter Rd. Suite 120 

Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309 

Deitrick H. Johnson, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, ASO-7 

Boca Raton, FL 33431 

TEL: 561-989-9955 

FAX: 561-989-9966 

Federal Aviation Administration, Southern Region 

1701 Columbia Avenue 

College Park, GA 30337 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

Hon. J .E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-31 0) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-6941 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-