alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 552.401 Reference to amended sections. ( a ) Reference to any section in this part is a reference to the same as currently amended, unless the reference includes a specific date. *See* 44 U.S.C. 1510.
( b ) Reference to any ruling, order, instruction, direction, or license issued pursuant to this part is a reference to the same as currently amended unless otherwise so specified.
HomeBiographies...Elizabeth Richard

# 				Elizabeth Richard			

															Coordinator for Counterterrorism						Bureau of Counterterrorism												

				December 29, 2023 -									Present							

Ambassador Elizabeth Richard was sworn in December 29, 2023, as the Coordinator for Counterterrorism with the rank and status of Ambassador-at-Large, leading the State Department’s Counterterrorism Bureau and serving as the principal adviser to the Secretary of State on international counterterrorism matters.  In this capacity, Ambassador Richard also oversees U.S. engagement in the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS.  Ambassador Richard is a career Foreign Service Officer with the rank of Career Minister.

Prior to her current role, she was a distinguished fellow at Georgetown University’s Institute for the Study of Diplomacy.  She served as the U.S. Ambassador to the Lebanese Republic, from 2016 until 2020.  She served in the Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs as Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for U.S. Assistance from 2013 – 2016.  She was the Deputy Chief of Mission in Sanaa, Yemen, from 2010 to 2013. Ambassador Richard has also served in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Italy, and Southeast Asia.

Ambassador Richard is a graduate of the National War College in Washington DC, and of the NATO Defense College in Rome, Italy.  She has a law degree from Southern Methodist University and practiced law in Texas before joining the Foreign Service.

Tags

Bureau of CounterterrorismState Department Official

Back to Top
§ 0.208 Care of agency records. ( a ) Employees shall not remove, alter, destroy, mutilate, access, copy, or retain documents or data in the custody of the federal government or provided to them in the course of their employment, without proper authorization.
( b ) The term “documents” includes, but is not limited to, any written, printed, typed or other graphic material, recording, computer tape, disk or hard drive, storage medium, blueprint, photograph, or other physical object on which information is recorded, including all copies of the foregoing by whatever means made, and any electronic file, data, or information stored on or created on a government computer, database, application, program, network, or storage medium.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2567

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act relating to standards

for constructed water conveyances.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 1, 1995

Mr. CONDIT (for himself and Mr. MATSUI) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act relating

to standards for constructed water conveyances.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONSTRUCTED WATER CONVEYANCES.

4 Section 303(c)(2) of the Federal Water Pollution

5 Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1313(c)(2)) is amended by adding

6 at the end the following:

7 ‘‘(C) STANDARDS FOR CONSTRUCTED

8 WATER CONVEYANCES.—

9 ‘‘(i) RELEVANT FACTORS.—If a State

10 exercises jurisdiction over constructed
2

•HR 2567 IH

1 water conveyances in establishing stand2 ards under this section, the State shall

3 consider the following:

4 ‘‘(I) The existing and planned

5 uses of water transported in a convey6 ance system.

7 ‘‘(II) Any water quality impacts

8 resulting from any return flow from a

9 constructed water conveyance to navi10 gable waters and the need to protect

11 downstream users.

12 ‘‘(III) Management practices nec13 essary to maintain the conveyance

14 system.

15 ‘‘(IV) State or regional water re16 sources management and water con17 servation plans.

18 ‘‘(V) The authorized purpose for

19 the constructed conveyance.

20 ‘‘(ii) RELEVANT USES.—If a State

21 adopts or reviews water quality standards

22 for constructed water conveyances, it shall

23 not be required to establish recreational,

24 aquatic life, or fish consumption uses for

25 such systems if the uses are not existing or
3

•HR 2567 IH

1 reasonably foreseeable or such uses impede

2 the authorized uses of the conveyance sys3 tem.

4 ‘‘(iii) STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION.—

5 Nothing in this subparagraph shall be con6 strued to require a State to exercise juris7 diction over constructed water conveyances

8 in establishing standards.

9 ‘‘(iv) CONSTRUCTED WATER CONVEY10 ANCES DEFINED.—In this subparagraph,

11 the term ‘constructed water conveyance’

12 means a manmade water transport system

13 constructed for the purpose of transporting

14 water in a waterway that is not and never

15 was a natural waterway.’’.

Æ
Attachment B

Figures

Figure 2. Location of the Storm Water Tanks at the Billings Refinery

Location of the

Storm Water

Tanks
Figure 3. Storm Water Tanks and Immediate A
Large

Crude

No. 2

H

ydroNo. 2 Reformer/ G Pl t/ Crude Light Straight Run – Distillate Naphtha Light Straight Run Propane Butane

H2

H2

Atm

Resid

Unit

y

treater

Gas Plant/

No. 2 Amine

SR - Distillate

AGO Kerosene

Distillate

Reformate

Small

Crude

Unit

No. 5

Hydro- Butamer/

LS

Atmospheric Gas Oil Light Straight Run

Naphtha

Propane

Butane

Isobutane

H2

Vacuum 

Unit

Hydrotreater HF Alky

Vacuum Gas Oil

Atm Resid

p

utane

Alkylate

Diesel

Gasoline No

4

Fluid 

Catalytic

Naphtha

Vac Resid

Naphtha Propane/

Butane

Propane/Bu

Light Cycle 

Oil

Distillate

H2

Feed 

Pro

No. 4

Hydrotreater Coker Unit Catalytic Cracking/ Gas 

Recovery 

Plant

Heavy Coker Gas OilDistillate

Clarified Oil

Sweet Gas Oil

Coke

Figure 4 – Operations Flow Diagram - ConocoPhillips Refinery, Billin
...\BFDs - HSE105\45BFD200.DGN 4/6/2010 12:28:55 PM - FOR REFERENCE ONLY - OFFICIAL DOCUMENT STORED ELECTRONICALLY -

Figure 5
M

M

Oil-bearing Hazardous Secondary Material from Process Area Storm water Tanks

Feed Mix Tank

Filter Precoat Mix Tank

Filter Press

Polymers, coagulants, body feed

Feed Pump

Recoveto Refinfor Oil RTreatm

Solids 

site TS

Sludge Feed Storage Tank

Figure 6. Process Diagram - Filter Press Operation 

M

M

Oil-bearing Hazardous Secondary Material from Process Area Storm water Tanks

Feed Mix Tank

Filter Precoat Mix Tank

Filter Press

Polymers, coagulants, body feed

Feed Pump

Recoveto Refinfor Oil RTreatm

Solids site TS

Sludge Feed Storage Tank
17

18

1920

21 2322 24

25 2726 28

29 31 

12

34

5 76 8

9 11

10 12

13 14 

North TankSouth Tank

North Q1 North Q2 North Q3 North Q4South Q1 South Q2 South Q3 South Q

8 = Approximate Sample Collection Location

Figure 7. Sample Collection Locations
§ 552.507 Provision of certain legal services. ( a ) The provision of the following legal services to or on behalf of persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 552.201 is authorized, provided that any receipt of payment of professional fees and reimbursement of incurred expenses must be authorized pursuant to § 552.508, which authorizes certain payments for legal services from funds originating outside the United States; via specific license; or otherwise pursuant to this part: ( 1 ) Provision of legal advice and counseling on the requirements of and compliance with the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States, provided that such advice and counseling are not provided to facilitate transactions in violation of this part;
( 2 ) Representation of persons named as defendants in or otherwise made parties to legal, arbitration, or administrative proceedings before any U.S. federal, state, or local court or agency;
( 3 ) Initiation and conduct of legal, arbitration, or administrative proceedings before any U.S. federal, state, or local court or agency;
( 4 ) Representation of persons before any U.S. federal, state, or local court or agency with respect to the imposition, administration, or enforcement of U.S. sanctions against such persons; and
( 5 ) Provision of legal services in any other context in which prevailing U.S. law requires access to legal counsel at public expense.
( b ) The provision of any other legal services to or on behalf of persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 552.201 not otherwise authorized in this part, requires the issuance of a specific license.
( c ) U.S. persons do not need to obtain specific authorization to provide related services, such as making filings and providing other administrative services, that are ordinarily incident to the provision of services authorized by paragraph (a) of this section. Additionally, U.S. persons who provide services authorized by paragraph (a) of this section do not need to obtain specific authorization to contract for related services that are ordinarily incident to the provision of those legal services, such as those provided by private investigators or expert witnesses, or to pay for such services. *See* § 552.404.
( d ) Entry into a settlement agreement or the enforcement of any lien, judgment, arbitral award, decree, or other order through execution, garnishment, or other judicial process purporting to transfer or otherwise alter or affect property or interests in property blocked pursuant to § 552.201 is prohibited unless licensed pursuant to this part.
Note 1 to § 552.507 .
Pursuant to part 501, subpart E, of this chapter, U.S. persons seeking administrative reconsideration or judicial review of their designation or the blocking of their property and interests in property may apply for a specific license from OFAC to authorize the release of certain blocked funds for the payment of professional fees and reimbursement of incurred expenses for the provision of such legal services where alternative funding sources are not available.
#### § 501.746 Referral to United States Department of Justice; administrative collection measures.

In the event that the respondent does not pay any penalty imposed pursuant to this part within 30 calendar days of the mailing of the written notice of the imposition of the penalty, the matter may be referred for administrative collection measures or to the United States Department of Justice for appropriate action to recover the penalty in a civil suit in a Federal district court.
HexCopter 800 Flight Summary Log Version 1.0-01012013 

Dated Flight Aircraft Avionics Firmware Battery Set Engine AVO Crew Location 

APM 2.5 

Descriptions Cheddlste 

Aircraft Modifications since last flight: Checks lhitials Date 

Pre Flight 

Motor & Props 

initials: Screws 

- - --- - - ---r--- -- - Flight Objectives: 

Avionics 

CG 

--- -- - - ---- - initials: Battery(s) 

Payloads (type & Senal): Payload 

Launch Area 

Flight Notes: Flight# Duration Comments rTel File: - 1 : 

Log File: 2 : 

3 : 

4 

5 : 

6 : 

7 

WX Notes: -- - - - initials: 

Maintenance Comments: Charge Capacity Flight Battery Weight Motor Flight 

mAh Volts ~ hh:mm:IS hh:mm:sa 

Batt #1: s AC & Batt: s s 

Batt #2: E Payload: E E 

Total: c Total: c c 

Hours Airframe Avionics Motors 

This flight 

TIIS 

- - - - - - - - · - - - c- ---~ r- - - -- - - ·- - - - - -

- - -- -- - -- - - ~ - - -- - - · - - ·- ..,_ _____ TSO 

-

initials: Total Cycles 

AeroEIOiix LLC.
40284.

#### PHILLIPS v. THE STATE.

Frankum, Judge.

A ground of a motion for a new trial complaining of the admission of evidence must show that the movant objected to the evidence at the time it was offered and must set forth the objection urged before the court at the time. *Hardy v. Hardy,*149 Ga. 371 (3) (100 SE 101); *Clare v. Drexler,*152 Ga. 419 (5) (110 SE 176). Special ground 1 of the amended motion for new trial complains because the court permitted three named witnesses to give testimony about things discovered as a result of an alleged illegal search because it is contended that the warrant under which the search was conducted was issued without probable cause; special ground 2 contends that the court erred in admitting the warrant itself in evidence for the same reason; and special ground 3 complains that the court erred in admitting the warrant in evidence because the laws of Georgia do not authorize the issuance of a search warrant by a justice of the peace. None of these grounds show that any such objections were urged before the court at the time this evidence was offered, and, under the rules of law first stated, they do not, therefore, show reversible error.

*541Decided October 23, 1963.

*George G. Finch,*for plaintiff in error.

*Jeff C. Wayne, Solicitor General, C. Frank Strickland, Jr.,*contra.

Special ground 4 assigns error on a portion of the judge’s charge because it is contended that it relieved the State of the burden of establishing knowledge on the part of the defendant that the numbers on the automobile had been altered and falsified as charged in the indictment. The record shows that immediately preceding the charge thus complained of the judge instructed the jury as to the four essential elements necessary to be proved in order to authorize the conviction of the defendant. Among these elements stated by the judge was “knowledge that an identification number on the vehicle engine had been removed or falsified and with intent to conceal or misrepresent the identity of the vehicle or engine.” It was not incumbent upon the judge to repeat this requirement in connection with the portion of the charge complained of in special ground 4. *Southern R. Co. v. Gale,*103 Ga. App 87, 90 (1) (118 SE2d 742); *Williams Bros. Grocery Co. v. Blanton,*105 Ga. App. 314, 320 (5) (124 SE2d 479).

3. The evidence showed that the arresting officers drove their automobile into the driveway of the defendant’s home; that the defendant and another person, who ran from the scene, were in the carport wherein was located an automobile which had recently been stolen in Atlanta; that the identifying number located on the front doorpost of the automobile had been removed, and the body had been partially disassembled from the frame and jacked up in a manner which would enable the removal of the identifying numbers from the frame. The defendant at that time freely and voluntarily admitted his participation in the crime charged. This evidence authorized the conviction.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.*
HomeBureau of Political-Military Affairs...Bureau of Political Military Affairs  Releases

# Bureau of Political-Military Affairs Releases

334 items

        -    Fact Sheet  		U.S. Conventional Weapons Destruction in East Asia and the Pacific: Clearing Legacy Contamination, Promoting Recovery in Conflict-Affected Countries	  April 4, 2024 
        -    Fact Sheet  		U.S. Conventional Weapons Destruction in Africa: Reducing the Threat of Explosive Hazards, Promoting Recovery in Conflict-Affected Countries	  April 4, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Inaugural Plenary Meeting for the Political Declaration on Responsible Military Use of Artificial Intelligence and Autonomy	  March 29, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		U.S. Arms Restrictions on Nicaragua	  Matthew MillerMarch 14, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		United States Announces Additional Military Assistance for Ukraine	  Antony J. BlinkenMarch 12, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		The U.S.-Republic of Korea Consultation on the Special Measures Agreement	  March 4, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Department of State Concludes $51 Million Settlement Resolving Export Violations by The Boeing Company	  February 29, 2024 
        -    DipNote  		Improving Food Security in Ukraine Through Demining	  February 28, 2024 
        -    DipNote  		With U.S. Support, Mostar Now Mine-Impact Free Nearly Three Decades After War’s End	  February 27, 2024 
        -    Testimony  		Testimony Before the House Committee on Foreign Affairs “AUKUS Implementation and Challenges to International Security and Arms Control in the 21st Century”	  Bonnie Denise JenkinsFebruary 14, 2024Rayburn House Office BuildingWashington, D.C. 

previous page12345…34next page

Back to Top
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Part I Modification 1.5 $ 127.50 $ 127.50 86 $10,965.00

Part II Modification 1.5 $ 127.50 $ 127.50 86 $10,965.00

Part III 

Modification 1.5 $ 127.50 $ 127.50 105 $13,387.50

Part IV 

Modificaiton 1.5 $ 127.50 $ 127.50 105 $13,387.50

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $48,705

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                             356
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,731
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (732)
<INVENTORY>                                     44,530
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                65,300
<PP&E>                                          25,036
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,283
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 118,046
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           75,574
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           123
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,393
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   118,046
<SALES>                                         75,544
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                75,544
<CGS>                                           61,716
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   61,716
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (211)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   363
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,473
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,021)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,144)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,877)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,877)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.63)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2673 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 2673

To amend the Interjurisdictional Fisheries Act of 1986 to authorize use 
of fishery resource disaster relief funds for assisting persons engaged 
   in commercial fisheries to respond to impacts of fishery resource 
                               disasters.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 20, 1995

 Mr. DeFazio introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Interjurisdictional Fisheries Act of 1986 to authorize use 
of fishery resource disaster relief funds for assisting persons engaged 
   in commercial fisheries to respond to impacts of fishery resource 
                               disasters.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fishing Families Relief Act of 
1995''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION TO USE FISHERY RESOURCE DISASTER RELIEF FUNDS TO 
              PROVIDE ASSISTANCE.

    Section 308(d) of the Interjurisdictional Fisheries Act of 1986 (16 
U.S.C. 4107(d)) is amended--
            (1) in the heading by striking ``Grants'' and inserting 
        ``Assistance'';
            (2) in paragraph (1) by striking ``award grants to persons 
        engaged in commercial fisheries, for uninsured losses 
        determined by the Secretary to have been suffered'' and 
        inserting ``help persons engaged in commercial fisheries, 
        either directly through assistance to persons or indirectly 
        through assistance to State and local government agencies and 
        non-profit organizations, for projects or other measures 
        designed to alleviate harm determined by the Secretary to have 
        been incurred'';
            (3) in paragraph (3) by striking ``a grant under this 
        subsection'' and inserting ``assistance under this subsection, 
        if provided directly to a person,'';
            (4) by striking paragraph (4), and redesignating paragraphs 
        (5) and (6) as paragraphs (4) and (5), respectively; and
            (5) in paragraph (4) (as so redesignated) by striking ``for 
        awarding grants'' and all that follows through the end of the 
        paragraph and inserting ``for receiving assistance under this 
        subsection.''.
                                 <all>
```