alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 341.6 Nontransferability.

United States Retirement Plan Bonds are not transferable, and may not be sold, discounted or pledged as collateral for a loan or as security for the performance of an obligation, or for any other purpose.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 351.83 [Reserved]
gy

UNITED STATES

BATHYMETRIC MAP

Ptdabes co Wes

US. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
MaNIDMAL OCEASIC Ans Denise TAA TIO
MATIONAL

1983

ATANIIC OCEAN

JONES
NOS NJ 19.7
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

Certification of Senior Officer in Charge of the Servicing Function 

of the Servicer Pursuant to Rule 15d-14(d)

**CERTIFICATION**

I, KevinJ. Cullum, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Nissan Auto Receivables 2017-A Owner Trust(the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4. I amresponsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports onassessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank National Association 

Date: June 26, 2020 

 
By: /s/ Kevin J. Cullum Kevin J. Cullum President and Chief Executive Officer of Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation (senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
 
**
Office for Domestic Preparedness 

U.S. Department of Homeland 

Security 

Washington, DC 20531

ODP Information Bulletin 

No. 192 October 14, 2005 

TO All State Administrative Agency Heads 

All State Administrative Agency Points of Contact 

All State Homeland Security Directors 

All Urban Area Core City/Core County Points of Contact 

FROM: Matt A. Mayer 

Acting Executive Director 

SUBJECT: Tactical Interoperable Communications Plan (TICP) Exercise Guidance 

Urban Areas and metropolitan areas designated by their State are required to develop and test their 

Tactical Interoperable Communications Plan (TICP) with a full-scale exercise. However, with the 

cancellation of the Multi Jurisdictional Prevention and Response Plan (MPRP) (Information Bulletin 

#187- August 18, 2005), the Office of State and Local Government Coordination and Preparedness 

(SLGCP) no longer requires grantees to use the Improvised Explosives Device (IED) scenario to test 

the TICP. The IED scenario was highlighted because of the high probability of that scenario occurring. 

However, Urban Areas can validate plans and assess interoperable communications capabilities with 

alternate scenarios. In addition, Urban Areas are reminded that they must first submit their TICP 

to the State Administrative Agency (SAA) and then SLGCP for approval prior to conducting an 

exercise. 

Urban Areas may build an exercise around any of the National Planning Scenarios to test the TICP 

requirement. If Urban Areas already have other full-scale exercises planned, they may use that exercise 

to meet the test requirement as long as that exercise is consistent with the requirements of the 

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP). For more information on how to 

structure an exercise please refer to HSEEP website at: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/odp/docs/hseep.htm

The release of the National Preparedness Goal, Target Capabilities List (TCL), and Universal Task List 

(UTL) presents an opportunity to build a foundation of capabilities-based planning. The TCL: Version 

2.0 represents a significant step forward in developing those readiness targets. It identifies 36 

capabilities required to prevent, protect against, respond to, and recover from incidents of national 

significance.. As jurisdictions plan their exercises, the Interoperable Communications Target 

Capability and “designated” Critical Tasks must be incorporated into their exercise activity to test the 

TICP. Additional information on the TCL may be located at the following website: 

http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/odp/assessments/hspd8.htm

For questions or additional information, please contact the ODP Helpline at 1-800-368-6498.
#### Dr. Francisco J. Mejías, Plaintiff and Appellee, *v.*Juan Jaime, Municipal Auditor of Humacao, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 7374.

Argued December 16, 1937.

Decided January 25, 1938.

*Burset & Pérez Pimentel*for appellant. *Gonzalez Fagundo & Gonzalez, Jr.*for appellee.

Mr. Justice Hutchison

delivered the opinion of the Court.

 A municipal auditor was required by an alternative writ of mandamus dated June 22, 1936, to issue a certificate of credit or to appear on June 24 and show cause why the writ should not be made permanent. The auditor appeared June 24, stating that he had been served with the alternative writ on the night of June 22 and had been unable to consult his attorneys until the afternoon of June 23. A motion for ten days within which to answer or otherwise plead was *519denied but the hearing was postponed to the morning of June 25. The auditor appeared on June 25 and acquiesced in the writ. The court then issued a peremptory writ with costs to plaintiff. An award of costs includes attorney’s fees unless such fees are expressly excluded. The appellee has filed no brief. Appellant is right, we think, in his contention that attorney’s fees should have been excluded. See *Harris*v. *Barbosa,*27 P.R.R. 53 and *García*v. *Hernández Usera,*No. 7122, decided December 10, 1937.

The judgment will be modified accordingly, and as modified, affirmed.

Mr. Justice Córdova Dávila took no part in the decision of this case.
- PEPFAR Home
- About Us
- Our Priorities
- Where We Work
- Results and Impact
- Partnerships
- Remarks and Releases
- Reports and Guidance

HomeThe United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief...AIDS – DREAMS Supplement June 15, 2022

# 									AIDS – DREAMS Supplement June 15, 2022							

July 25, 2022

#### **AIDS – DREAMS Supplement**

**June 15, 2022 – Volume 36 – Issue Supplement 1 : AIDS (lww.com)**

**HIV prevention for adolescent girls and young women and their partners under the DREAMS partnership: assessing implementation, uptake and impact​******

 

**Editors: Saiqa Mullick and Frances M. Cowan**

**June 15, 2022 – Volume 36 – Supplement 1**
        - **Evaluating the Determined, Resilient, Empowered, AIDS-free, Mentored, and Safe programme, what’s worked and what more needs to be done?**  (Mullick, S et al.)
        - **The evolution of DREAMS: using data for continuous program improvement**  (Saul, J et al.)
        - **From policy to practice: uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis among adolescent girls and young women in United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief-supported countries, 2017–2020**  (Patel, P et al.)
        - **Awareness and uptake of the Determined, Resilient, Empowered, AIDS-free, Mentored and Safe HIV prevention package over time among population-based cohorts of young women in Kenya and South Africa**  (Gourlay, AJ et al.) ****
        - **The association of exposure to DREAMS on sexually acquiring or transmitting HIV amongst adolescent girls and young women living in rural South Africa**  (Mthiyane, N et al.)
        - **Modeling DREAMS impact: trends in new HIV diagnoses among women attending antenatal care clinics in DREAMS countries**  (Saul, J et al.)
        - **DREAMS impact on HIV status knowledge and sexual risk among cohorts of young women in Kenya and South Africa**  (Floyd, S et al.) ******Assessing layered HIV prevention programming: optimizing outcomes for adolescent girls and young women**  (Mathur, S et al.)
        - **Inroads for HIV prevention among men: findings from mixed methods research in the context of the DREAMS partnership in Southern Africa** (Gottert, A et al.)
        - **Effects of men’s lifetime adverse events experience on violence, HIV risk, and wellbeing: insights from three countries**  (Pulerwitz, J et al.)
        - **Unit costs of a community-based girl-centered HIV prevention program: a case study of Determined, Resilient, Empowered, AIDS-Free, Mentored, and Safe program**  (Okal, JO et al.)

 

Tags

Global HealthGlobal Women's IssuesHIV/AIDSThe United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS ReliefU.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief

Back to Top
# Gazzetta ufficiale C 40/2012

| | ISSN 1977-0944
  doi:10.3000/19770944.C_2012.040.ita |
| --- | --- |
| Gazzetta ufficiale
  dell'Unione europea | C 40 |
| | |
| Edizione in lingua italiana | Comunicazioni e informazioni | 55o anno11 febbraio 2012 |

ISSN 1977-0944

doi:10.3000/19770944.C_2012.040.ita

Gazzetta ufficiale

dell'Unione europea

C 40

Edizione in lingua italiana

Comunicazioni e informazioni

55o anno11 febbraio 2012

---

| Numero d'informazione | Sommario | pagina |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Avvisi |
| | PROCEDIMENTI AMMINISTRATIVI |
| | Parlamento europeo |
| 2012/C 040/01 | Decisione | 1 |

Numero d'informazione

Sommario

pagina

V   Avvisi

PROCEDIMENTI AMMINISTRATIVI

Parlamento europeo

2012/C 040/01

Decisione

1

| IT | |
| --- | --- |

IT

---

V Avvisi

PROCEDIMENTI AMMINISTRATIVI

Parlamento europeo

| 11.2.2012 | IT | Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea | C 40/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2012

IT

Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea

C 40/1

---

DECISIONE

2012/C 40/01

IL SEGRETARIO GENERALE DEL PARLAMENTO EUROPEO,

visto lo statuto dei funzionari dell'Unione europea e il regime applicabile agli altri agenti di tali Comunità, definiti dal regolamento (CEE, Euratom, CECA) n. 259/68 del Consiglio e modificati da ultimo dal regolamento (CE, Euratom) n. 723/2004 del Consiglio, in particolare l'articolo 30 di tale statuto,

vista la decisione dell'Ufficio di presidenza concernente la designazione dell'Autorità che ha il potere di nomina, modificata da ultimo il 26 ottobre 2004,

visti i bandi di concorso e di assunzione:

PE/96/A, PE/97/A, A/94, A/95, A/96, AD/1/08, AD/3/08, AD/4/08, PE/99/S, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/106/S, PE/107/S, PE/109/S, B/174, B/175, B/176, C/348, AST/1/2005, AST/1/2006, AST/5/2008, PE/69/S, PE/96/S, PE/110/S,

visto il parere della commissione paritetica emesso nella sua riunione del 26 ottobre 2011,

DECIDE:

Articolo unico

La durata di validità degli elenchi di riserva dei concorsi e di assunzione:

PE/96/A, PE/97/A, A/94, A/95, A/96, AD/1/08, AD/3/08, AD/4/08, PE/99/S, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/106/S, PE/107/S, PE/109/S, B/174, B/175, B/176, C/348, AST/1/2005, AST/1/2006, AST/5/2008, PE/69/S, PE/96/S, PE/110/S

è prorogata fino al 31 dicembre 2012.

Fatto a Lussemburgo, il 18 dicembre 2011

Klaus WELLE

Segretario generale

---
WWW.GEN-4.ORG

Molten Salt Reactor (MSR)

The Molten Salt Reactor 

(MSR) system produces fission power in 

a circulating molten salt fuel 

mixture with an epithermalspectrum reactor and a full 

actinide recycle fuel cycle. In 

the MSR system, the fuel is 

The MSR has a closed fuel 

cycle that can be tailored 

for the efficient burnup of 

plutonium and minor actinides.

a circulating liquid mixture 

of sodium, zirconium, and 

uranium fluorides. The molten 

salt fuel flows through graphite core channels, producing 

an epithermal spectrum. The 

heat generated in the molten 

salt is transferred to a second07-GA50277-07

ary coolant system through an 

intermediate heat exchanger, 

and then through a tertiary 

heat exchanger to the power 

conversion system. The reference plant has a power level of 

1,000 MWe. The system has a 

coolant outlet temperature of 

700 degrees Celsius, possibly 

ranging up to 800 degrees 

Celsius, affording improved 

thermal efficiency. The closed 

fuel cycle can be tailored for 

the efficient burnup of plutonium and minor actinides.

For more information: Ralph Bennett • 208-526-7708 • Ralph.Bennett@inl.gov

Heat Sink

Heat Exchanger

Electrical

Power

Compressor

Compressor

Intercooler

Heat

Sink

Recuperator

Generator

Turbine

Heat Exchanger

Pump

Chemical

Processing

Plant

Emergency Dump Tanks

Freeze

Plug

Reactor

Control

Rods

Coolant Salt

Fuel Salt

Purified

Salt

Pump

Pre Cooler
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 161 (Friday, August 21, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 42332]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20098]



[[Page 42332]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463 as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Site Visit review of the Materials Research Science and 
Engineering Center (MRSEC) at Carnegie Mellon University (CMU), by 
NSF Division of Materials Research (DMR) <greek-i>1203.
    Dates and Times: September 28, 2009; 7:45 a.m.-9 p.m. September 
29, 2009; 8 a.m.-3:30 p.m.
    Place: Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
    Type of Meeting: Part-open.
    Contact Person: Dr. William Brittain, Program Director, 
Materials Research Science and Engineering Centers Program, Division 
of Materials Research, Room 1065, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone (703) 292-5039.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning further support of the MRSEC at Carnegie Mellon 
University.

Agenda

Monday, September 28, 2009

7:45 a.m.-4:45 p.m. Open--Review of the CMU MRSEC.
4:45 p.m.-6 p.m. Closed--Executive Session.
6 p.m.-7 p.m. Open--Poster Session.
7 p.m.-9 p.m. Open--Dinner.

Tuesday, September 29, 2009

8 a.m.-9 a.m. Closed--Executive session.
9 a.m.-9:45 a.m. Open--Review of the Carnegie Mellon MRSEC.
9:45 a.m.-3:30 p.m. Closed--Executive Session, Draft and Review 
Report.
    Reason for Closing: The work being reviewed may include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552 b(c), (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: August 18, 2009.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-20098 Filed 8-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
1 Mears, Gilbert

From: Terrie Baumgardner <tbm2@psu.edu> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 12:35 PM To: Mears, Gilbert Subject: TRI Loophole
Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged

Please close the TRI Loophole that the oil and gas industry currently enjoys.

The public deserves to know exactly what these op erations are releasing in to our air, water and onto our land, and it is the EPA's job to ensure fairness for the public and protection for public health in the face of industry pressures.

Thank you,
Terrie Baumgardner
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 205.21 When may clearance patterns be used? ( a ) A State may develop a clearance pattern for: ( 1 ) An individual Federal assistance program;
( 2 ) A logical group of Federal assistance programs that have the same disbursement method and type of payee;
( 3 ) A bank account;
( 4 ) A specific type of payment, such as payroll or vendor payments; or
( 5 ) Anything that is agreed upon by us and a State. If a clearance pattern is used for multiple Federal assistance programs, a State must apply the clearance pattern separately to each Federal assistance program when scheduling funds transfers or calculating interest.
( b ) As set forth in § 205.9, a Treasury-State agreement must include the method a State uses to develop and maintain clearance patterns.
§ 19.705 What does the suspending official consider in issuing a suspension? ( a ) In determining the adequacy of the evidence to support the suspension, the suspending official considers how much information is available, how credible it is given the circumstances, whether or not important allegations are corroborated, and what inferences can reasonably be drawn as a result. During this assessment, the suspending official may examine the basic documents, including grants, cooperative agreements, loan authorizations, contracts, and other relevant documents.
( b ) An indictment, conviction, civil judgment, or other official findings by Federal, State, or local bodies that determine factual and/or legal matters, constitutes adequate evidence for purposes of suspension actions.
( c ) In deciding whether immediate action is needed to protect the public interest, the suspending official has wide discretion. For example, the suspending official may infer the necessity for immediate action to protect the public interest either from the nature of the circumstances giving rise to a cause for suspension or from potential business relationships or involvement with a program of the Federal Government.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

RAYMOND M. KRUSHIN,

Petitioner

v.

COMMON PLEAS COURT LUZERNE

COUNTY,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 102 MM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 16th day of August

, 2017, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process is GRANTED , and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and the

Application for an Immediate Hearing are DENIED

.
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10
- 16
- 00405
- CR IN RE DEMARCUS DONTR ELL RIDGE

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Demarcus D. Ridge’s p etition for w rit of m andamus was filed with this Court on November 29, 2016. There are numerous procedural deficiencies with the petition, including but not limited to an inadequate record and the failure to serve the trial court as the respondent or the State of Texas as the real party in interest. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.7; 52.2; 9.5(a). However, to expedite a decision in this proceeding, we use Rule 2 to suspend
the rules and overlook these and other deficiencies. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 2. Ridge contends that on October 17, 201 6, he filed a motion with the 54th District Court requesting an order to the clerk of the court to make available grand jury testimony in a particular case or explain why there is no such testimony in the court’s file. RidgeIn re Ridge Page 2

further contends that in respo nse, the court sent Ridge a list of what was contained in the reporter’s record which did not include grand jury testimony. Ridge did not include a record with his petition which would contain a file stamped copy of his motion and any response by the cour t. The need to consider and rule on a properly filed and presented document is not a discretionary act but a ministerial one, and a trial court is allowed a reasonable time within which to perform that act. In re Chavez , 62 S.W.3d 225, 228

- 229 (Tex. App.

— Amarillo 2001, orig. proceeding). However, without a record sufficient to show a violation of this duty, we cannot issue a mandamus against the trial court. See In re Wallace , No. 10

- 15

- 00065

- CR, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 2682, *2 (Tex. App.

— Waco Mar. 19,
2015 , orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). It also appears that Ridge wants the trial court and this Court to grant his motion. An appellate court can only compel a trial court to rule on a pending motion by a writ of mandamus; it cannot compel the trial court to r ule in a certain way. State ex rel. Young v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Appeals at Texarkana , 236 S.W.3d 207, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007); State ex rel. Curry v. Gray , 726 S.W.2d 125, 128 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987); In re Birdwell , 393 S.W.3d 886, 892 (Tex. App.

— Waco 2012, orig. proceeding). Further, in a mandamus proceeding alleging the trial court's failure to rule, we do not render the order or judgment the trial court should have rendered as we do in an appeal. In re Birdwell , 393
S.W.3d at 892.In re Ridge Page 3

Accord ingly, for the reasons discussed, the petition for writ of mandamus is
denied.

TOM GRAY Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Pet. denied Opinion delivered and filed December 7 , 2016 Do not publish [OT 06]
§ 50.93 Notification of recoupment. ( a ) Treasury will provide notifications of recoupment through publication of notices in the Federal Register or in another manner Treasury deems appropriate, based upon the circumstances of the certified act(s) of terrorism under consideration.
( b ) Treasury will provide reasonable advance notice to insurers of any initial Federal terrorism policy surcharge effective date. This effective date shall be January 1 of the calendar year following publication of the notice, unless such date would not provide for sufficient notice of implementation while meeting the collection timing requirements of section 103(e)(8)(E) of the Act.
( c ) Treasury will provide reasonable advance notice to insurers of any modification or cessation of the Federal terrorism policy surcharge.
( d ) Treasury will provide notification to insurers annually as to the continuation of the Federal terrorism policy surcharge.
EX-10.35



 Exhibit 10.35 

 

			
		  	 AMENDMENT NO. 3, dated as of January 02, 2012, to that Employment Agreement dated March 22, 2009 (the “Agreement”) by and
between DVID LECKEY (the “Executive”) and AMERICAN MEDIA OPERATIONS, INC. (the “Company”).


 Effective as of the date first written above, the Agreement is hereby amended as follows: 

1. Paragraph 1a of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted and the following substituted therefore: 

Employment Term. The Company shall employ Executive until March 31, 2013 (the “Employment Term”) on
the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Agreement. The Agreement shall be considered effective as of March 22, 2009 (the “Effective Time”). 

All other terms and conditions of Your Employment Agreement and any subsequent amendments of that Employment Agreement shall remain in
full force and effect (unless modified above). 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment
No. 7 as of the date first written above. 
  

			
	AMERICAN MEDIA OPERATIONS, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Daniel Rotstein
	
	/s/ David Leckey
	David Leckey