alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         224,296
<SECURITIES>                                   142,486
<RECEIVABLES>                                  335,740
<ALLOWANCES>                                    41,775
<INVENTORY>                                    356,215
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,502,161
<PP&E>                                         337,590
<DEPRECIATION>                                 304,872
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,381,031
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,730,498
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         11
<COMMON>                                         1,410
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,414,467
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,381,031
<SALES>                                      1,113,248
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,113,248
<CGS>                                          636,976
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  204,649
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   303
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             216,852
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 54,468
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             54,468
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    54,468
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.004)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.004)


</TABLE>
#### § 549.402 Effect of amendment.

Unless otherwise specifically provided, any amendment, modification, or revocation of any provision in or appendix to this part or chapter or of any order, regulation, ruling, instruction, or license issued by the Office of Foreign Assets Control does not affect any act done or omitted, or any civil or criminal proceeding commenced or pending, prior to such amendment, modification, or revocation. All penalties, forfeitures, and liabilities under any such order, regulation, ruling, instruction, or license continue and may be enforced as if such amendment, modification, or revocation had not been made.
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19

- 604 V

UNPUBLISHED

MICHAEL BRENT KLUSMAN

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: May 11, 2020

Special Processing Unit (SPU) ;

Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Guillain

- Barre Syndrome (GBS)

William Patrick Ronan, III, The Ronan Law Firm, Overland Parks, KS , for petitioner.

Ida Nassar , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On April 23, 2019

, Michael B rent Klus man filed a petition for compensation under

the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

. , 2 (the

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffer ed Guillain

- Barre Sy ndrom e ( “ GBS ” ) as

a result of an in fluenza ( “ fl u ” ) vaccination administered on November 8, 2017 . Petit ion

at 1 . The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special

Masters.

On April 30, 2020

, R espondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes

that P etitioner is entitled to compensa tion in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report

at 1. Specifically, R espondent has reviewed the petition and medical records , and it is

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am

required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Managemen t and Promotion of

Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to

the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to

redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of

privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such

material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 19 86, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755

. Hereinafter, for

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. §

300aa (2012 ).2 his position th at Petitioner suffered from GBS. Id. at 6 . Respondent further agrees that

Petitioner has satisfied the criteria set forth in the revised Vaccine Injury Table and the

Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation

. Id.

In view of R espondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that

P etitioner is entitle d to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
#### § 536.304 Foreign person.

The term *foreign person* means any citizen or national of a foreign state (including any such individual who is also a citizen or national of the United States), wherever located, or any entity not organized solely under the laws of the United States or existing solely in the United States, but does not include a foreign state.

[86 FR 26664, May 17, 2021]
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 10474 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

REGINALD KENT CANTLY

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:13

- CR

- 103

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Reginald Kent
Cantly has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632
F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Cantly has filed a response. We have reviewed
counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein , as well

as Cantly ’ s response . We concur with c ounsel’s assessment that the appeal

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 14, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-10474 Document: 00513342943 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/14/2016No. 15

- 10474

2 presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 15-10474 Document: 00513342943 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/14/2016
40128.

#### STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT v. COCHRAN et al.

Hall, Judge.

In this case the State Highway Department, as plaintiff in error in this court, argues that the trial court erred in overruling two special grounds of its motion for new trial following a verdict of $21,500 for the condemnees for the taking of approximately 28 acres of land in Laurens County. *Held:*

*62Decided June 4, 1963

Rehearing denied June 19, 1963.

1. The condemnor assigns error on an excerpt from the charge on the ground that it was misleading and suggested to the jury that they could award both actual and consequential damages for the land actually taken, and also consequential damages for depreciation in the value of the condemnee’s land not taken. This ground is without merit, particularly when the excerpt is considered in connection with the whole charge. *Venable v. Gresham,*105 Ga. App. 720, 724 (125 SE2d 507). The court’s charge made it clear that the condemnees were entitled to recover two kinds of damages— direct damages measured by the fair and reasonable value of the land taken, and consequential damages to the remaining lands that might result from locating the road through the property. The wording of the charge considered in *Wheeler v. State Hwy. Dept.,*106 Ga. App. 323 (126 SE2d 808), relied on by the condemnor, was substantially different from the charge here complained of, and that case is not applicable.

2. The condemnor contends that, because there were no unusual circumstances in this case which would authorize the jury to measure the condemnee’s damages by anything other than the fair market value of the property, the trial court erred in charging that the value of the property to the owner may be awarded as damages when the market value and the actual value are not the same. The charge excepted to is a full page in length in the record. It contains instructions that are correct and applicable, including instructions that the Constitution provides for just and adequate compensation to the owner for the taking of his property, and that generally the fair market value of the property taken is the measure of the condemnee’s loss. Therefore, even if the value to the owner theory was inapplicable and under previous decisions (see *State Hwy. Dept. v. Thomas,*106 Ga. App. 849, 852, 128 SE2d 520) should not have been charged in this case, the condemnor’s assignment of error on instructions as a whole, a part of which were authorized, is without merit. *Hubbard v. Squadrito,*107 Ga. App. 651 (131 SE2d 227).

The trial court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Carlisle, P. J., and Bell, J., concur.*

*63
      *Eugene Cook, Attorney General,*Cartel* *Goode, Richard L. Chambers, Assistant Attorneys General, H. Dale Thompson,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. W. Larsen, Jr., Daioson Kea, R. M. Daley,*contra.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2615 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2615

         To suspend temporarily the duty on dichlorofopmethyl.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 10, 1995

  Mr. Castle introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on dichlorofopmethyl.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:
    

         ``    9902.30.16     Methyl 2-[4-(2,4-                                                                 
                               dichlorophenoxy)                                                                 
                               phenoxy]                                                                         
                               propanoate                                                                       
                               (dichlorofopmeth                                                                 
                               yl) in bulk or                                                                   
                               in forms or                                                                      
                               packages for                                                                     
                               retail sale (CAS                                                                 
                               No. 51338-27-3)                                                                  
                               (provided for in                                                                 
                               subheading                                                                       
                               2918.90.20 or                                                                    
                               3808.30.15).....  Free        No change        No change       On or before      
                                                                                               12/31/98         
                                                                                                                

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 544.703 Penalty imposition.

If, after considering any written response to the Pre-Penalty Notice and any relevant facts, the Office of Foreign Assets Control determines that there was a violation by the alleged violator named in the Pre-Penalty Notice and that a civil monetary penalty is appropriate, the Office of Foreign Assets Control may issue a Penalty Notice to the violator containing a determination of the violation and the imposition of the monetary penalty. For additional details concerning issuance of a Penalty Notice, see appendix A to part 501 of this chapter. The issuance of the Penalty Notice shall constitute final agency action. The violator has the right to seek judicial review of that final agency action in federal district court.
Exhibit 10.4


 


R&S Investments, LLC


 


	 	August 28, 2012


 


Hollywood Media Corp.


2255 Glades Road, Suite 221A


Boca Raton, FL 33431


 


Re:       Contingent
Additional Payment


 


In the event of a "Change of Control"
(as defined in the following two sentences) with respect to Hollywood.com, LLC ("Hollywood.com") prior to August 31,
2015, R&S Investments, LLC ("R&S Investments") shall pay to Hollywood Media Corp. ("Hollywood Media")
the "Contingent Additional Payment" (as hereinafter defined). A "Change of Control" with respect to Hollywood.com
means the consummation of a sale of all the assets of Hollywood.com to one person or a group of persons not controlled by, directly
or indirectly, Mitchell Rubenstein ("Rubenstein") and Laurie S. Silvers ("Silvers") or their
heirs, personal representatives or affiliates. For this purpose, an entity shall be considered to be controlled by Rubenstein and
Silvers if they own, directly or through tiers of ownership, 50% or more of the total equity interests in such entity (as determined
by either fair market value or voting power) immediately after the transfer of assets. The Contingent Additional Payment will be
Three Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($3,500,000) or, if less, the amount received by R&S Investments in connection
with the Change of Control. For the avoidance of doubt, Hollywood.com and Totally Hollywood TV, LLC shall have no liability for,
and the assets of Hollywood.com and Totally Hollywood TV, LLC and membership interests therein shall not otherwise be subject to,
the contingent obligation described in this letter. There is no guaranty or assurance that a Change of Control will occur prior
to August 31, 2015, and R&S Investments shall have no obligation to seek a Change of Control.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	R&S Investments, LLC
	 	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/ Mitchell Rubenstein	 
	 	 	Mitchell Rubenstein
	 	 	Managing Member
#### § 501.720 Separation of functions.

Any officer or employee engaged in the performance of investigative or prosecutorial functions for the Department in a proceeding as defined in § 501.702 may not, in that proceeding or one that is factually related, participate or advise in the decision pursuant to Section 557 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 557, except as a witness or counsel in the proceeding.
HomeDiplomatic Security Service Memorial...Daniel  Onateh

# 				Daniel  Onateh			

				Local Guard Force			

Deceased				June 11, 2009			

**Please contact DS Public Affairs (dspublicaffairs@state.gov) if you have an image of this individual.**Back to DSS Memorial

Tags

Diplomatic Security Service MemorialNigeria

Back to Top
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-14-0153

SAT Date: 12/31/2013

Print Date: 6/4/2014

Related cases:

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 2 3

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

1 2 1 Linear

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: Yes

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: IRR/CORR-S,E,L,MM; AQUATOX

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-14-0153-56

FATE: Estimations for typical MW 

367.62

Liquid with MP < 25 C (E)

log Kow = 5.45 (E) 

S = 0.74 mg/L at 25 C; Disp. (E;ICB)

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

log Koc = 5.40 (E)

log Fish BCF = 1.89 (E)
log Fish BAF = 2.94(E) 

POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption and biodeg

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = Linear wk; Highly branched ≥ mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong

PBT Potential: Linear P1B2; Highly branched P2B3

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is poor from the skin, moderate from the GI 

tract, and good from the lung (analog). Concern for severe irritation and possible corrosion from 

the 

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 0.26 amide SAR

daphnid 48-h LC50 0.050

green algal 96-h EC50 0.018

fish _ chronic value 0.004

daphnid _ chronic 

value

0.006

algal _ chronic 

value

0.008

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for amides 

SAR chemical class = amide, MW 368; log Kow 5.67 (EPI); liquid with mp 

unknown (P); S = 3.1 mg/L or dispersible (P); effective concentrations based on 100% active 

ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC 

<2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

1

SARs amides 

SAR Class amide,

Ecotox Category 

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of Transcend Services, Inc., certifies that to
the undersigneds knowledge, the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Transcend Services, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made
solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Mark D. Meersman   
|Mark D. Meersman       
|Chief Financial Officer
|                       
|Date: April 28, 2005
HomeBiographies...Thomas Kerrihard

# 				Dr. Thomas Kerrihard			

															Deputy Chief Medical Officer for Mental Health Programs 						Bureau of Medical Services												

				September 19, 2022 -									Present							

Tags

Bureau of Medical ServicesState Department Official

Back to Top
NUMBER 13-14-00299-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

 

MARCUS ALLEN BERGH, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 24th District Court

of Victoria County, Texas.

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez, and Garza

Order Per Curiam

Appellant’s brief was originally due on August 13, 2014. Pursuant to Texas Rule 

of Appellate Procedure 38.8(b)(2), on August 19, 2014, the Clerk of the Court notified 

appellant’s counsel that the brief had not been timely filed. Appellant’s counsel filed a 

motion for extension of time to file the brief until November 7, 2014, which was granted
2

by the Court. The brief was not filed and on November 14, 2014, the Clerk of the Court 

notified appellant’s counsel that the brief had not been timely filed. Appellant’s counsel 

filed a second motion for extension of time to file the brief which was granted by order to 

file the brief on or before February 2, 2015. The order notified counsel that no further 

extensions would be granted absent exigent circumstances. Counsel has nevertheless 

failed to file an appellate brief in this matter.

Accordingly, we now ABATE this appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court 

for further proceedings pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) and (3) of the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure. Upon remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means necessary to make 

appropriate findings and recommendations concerning the following: (1) whether 

appellant desires to prosecute this appeal; (2) why appellant's counsel has failed to file a 

brief and whether counsel has effectively abandoned the appeal; (3) whether appellant 

has been denied effective assistance of counsel; (4) whether appellant's counsel should 

be removed; and (5) whether appellant is indigent and entitled to court-appointed counsel.

If the trial court determines that appellant does want to continue the appeal, that 

present counsel should be removed, and that appellant is indigent and entitled to 

court-appointed counsel, the trial court shall appoint new counsel to represent appellant 

in this appeal. If new counsel is appointed, the name, address, telephone number, email 

address, and state bar number of said counsel shall be included in an order appointing 

counsel.

The trial court shall cause its findings and recommendations, together with any 

orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues, to be included in a supplemental 
3

clerk's record. Furthermore, the trial court shall cause a supplemental reporter's record 

of any proceedings to be prepared. The supplemental clerk's record and supplemental 

reporter's record, if any, shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before the 

expiration of thirty days from the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

18th day of February, 2015.
#### § 525.501 General and specific licensing procedures.

For provisions relating to licensing procedures, see part 501, subpart E, of this chapter. Licensing actions taken pursuant to part 501 of this chapter with respect to the prohibitions contained in this part are considered actions taken pursuant to this part. General licenses and statements of licensing policy relating to this part also may be available through the Burma sanctions page on OFAC's website: *www.treasury.gov/ofac.*