alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2578

To clarify the provision of section 3626(b) of title 39, United States Code,

defining an ‘‘institution of higher education’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 2, 1995

Mr. MOAKLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

A BILL

To clarify the provision of section 3626(b) of title 39, United

States Code, defining an ‘‘institution of higher education’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT.

4 Paragraph (3) of section 3626(b) of title 39, United

5 States Code, is amended by striking the period and insert6 ing ‘‘, and includes a nonprofit organization that coordi7 nates a network of college-level courses that is sponsored

8 primarily by nonprofit educational institutions for an older

9 adult constituency.’’.

Æ
#### § 544.305 Interest.

Except as otherwise provided in this part, the term *interest*, when used with respect to property (e.g., “an interest in property”), means an interest of any nature whatsoever, direct or indirect.
§ 555.206 Exempt transactions. ( a ) *United Nations Participation Act.* The exemptions described in this section do not apply to transactions involving property or interests in property of persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to the authority of the United Nations Participation Act, as amended (22 U.S.C. 287c) (UNPA). Note 1 to paragraph ( a
):
Persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to the authority of the UNPA include those listed on *both* OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List) and the Consolidated United Nations Security Council Sanctions List (UN List) (*see https://www.un.org*), as well as persons listed on the SDN List for being owned or controlled by, or acting for or on behalf of, persons listed on *both* the SDN List and the UN List.
( b ) *International Emergency Economic Powers Act.* The prohibitions contained in this part do not apply to any transactions that are exempt pursuant to section 203(b) of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)).
HomeUnder Secretary for Arms Control and International Security...Under Secretary for Arms Control and International Security Affairs  Releases

# Under Secretary for Arms Control and International Security Releases

133 items

        -    Remarks  		Statement to the Press Following Under Secretary Jenkins’s Meeting with Moroccan Foreign Minister Nasser Bourita	  Bonnie Denise JenkinsJanuary 30, 2024Rabat, Morocco 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Jenkins Travels to Rabat and Marrakech	  January 26, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Jenkins Travels to New Orleans	  January 19, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Jenkins Travels to Geneva	  January 17, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Jenkins Travels to London	  January 10, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		The United States Announces Key Measures to Jump Start Deployments of Advanced Nuclear Energy Systems and to Secure Nuclear Fuel Supply Chains, Accelerating the Contribution of Nuclear Energy to Net Zero Goals	  December 5, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		AUKUS: A Commitment to the Future	  Bonnie Denise JenkinsNovember 27, 2023Atlantic CouncilWashington D.C. 
        -    Media Note  		Secretary’s International Security Advisory Board Releases Report on Deterrence in a World of Nuclear Multipolarity	  November 15, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		Under Secretary Jenkins Travels to Norfolk and Newport News, Virginia and Halifax, Canada, November 15-19, 2023	  November 14, 2023 
        -    Remarks  		Under Secretary Jenkins’ Remarks at the Launch Event for the Political Declaration on Responsible Military Use of Artificial Intelligence and Autonomy	  Bonnie Denise JenkinsNovember 13, 2023United Nations Headquarters BuildingNew York 

previous page12345…14next page

Back to Top
#### § 542.410 Setoffs prohibited.

A setoff against blocked property (including a blocked account), whether by a U.S. bank or other U.S. person, is a prohibited transfer under § 542.201 if effected after the effective date.
#### § 525.308 OFAC.

The term *OFAC* means the Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Larry G. Gerdes, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Transcend Services, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2009; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles; 

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: August 3, 2009
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Assistant Secretary Robinson’s Travel to San Diego

# 									Assistant Secretary Robinson’s Travel to San Diego							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

October 12, 2023

Assistant Secretary for the Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL) Todd D. Robinson will travel to San Diego October 12–15 to participate in the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) conference.

Assistant Secretary Robinson will engage with more than 200 international delegates from a variety of countries including Kazakhstan, Mexico, Nigeria, Ukraine, the Philippines, and the Dominican Republic as well as U.S. local, state, and federal law enforcement partners to discuss enhancing law enforcement capabilities in the global community.

The IACP Conference serves as a dynamic forum for law enforcement professionals to share knowledge and innovative approaches to address evolving challenges.

For further information, please contact INL-PAPD@state.gov or visit @StateINL on Twitter/X.

Tags

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsCaliforniaLaw EnforcementOffice of the SpokespersonTravel

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
HomeDiplomatic Security Service Memorial...William Michael  Sebast

# 				William Michael  Sebast			

				U.S. Military–Other/Embassy Security Operations			

Deceased				January 31, 1968			

Cpl. William Michael Sebast, U.S. Army, died on January 31, 1968, defending U.S. Embassy Saigon during a Viet Cong attack. His hometown is Albany, New York. **U.S. Government Image**

Back to DSS Memorial

Tags

Diplomatic Security Service MemorialVietnam

Back to Top
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
EVA M. FUTCH, Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP; et al., Defendants - Appellees. No. 11-17573D.C. No. 2:10-cv-02256-KJDGWF
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Kent J. Dawson, District Judge, Presiding Submitted May 15, 2014 **

San Francisco, California Before: RIPPLE, *** SILVERMAN, and GOULD, Circuit Judges. 

# FILED
MAY 19 2014 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Kenneth F. Ripple, Senior Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, sitting by designation.-2- Eva M. Futch appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing her diversity action arising out of forecl osure proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. King v. California , 784 F.2d 910, 912 (9th Cir. 1986). We affirm. The district court properly dismissed Futch’s wrongful foreclosure and quiet title claims because Futch did not allege f acts showing that she was not in default on her loan when defendants initiated non-judicial foreclosure proceedings. See Breliant v. Preferred Equities Corp ., 918 P.2d 314, 318 (Nev. 1996) (per curiam) (“In a quiet title action, the burden of proof rests with the plaintiff to prove good title in himself.”); Collins v. Union Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n , 662 P.2d 610, 623 (Nev. 1983) (wrongful foreclosure claim re quires allegation that a lender exercised the power of sale and foreclosed upon property when no failure of performance existed on the part of the borrower). The district court properly dismissed Futch’s civil conspiracy and injunctive and declaratory relief claims after dismissing the underlying causes of action. See, e.g. , Eikelberger v. Tolotti , 611 P.2d 1086, 1088 (Nev. 1980) (conspiracy action for damages generally must be based on a viable, independent cause of action). Futch’s contentions that defendants lacked standing to pursue foreclosure, and that the assignments transferring the interest in the promissory note and deed-3- of trust are invalid, in part because of the use of Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (“MERS”) as the benefi ciary of the deed of trust and lender’s nominee, are foreclosed by Edelstein v. Bank of New York Mellon , 286 P.3d 249, 259-60, 262 (Nev. 2012) (en banc) (separating the instruments does not permanently bar foreclosure, and an en tity has authority to pursue foreclosure when it is entitled to enforce both the deed of trust and the note); see also Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 656 F.3d 1034, 1044 (9th Cir. 2011) (MERS may act as a beneficiary of the trust deed). AFFIRMED.
#### § 526.802 Delegation of certain authorities of the Secretary of the Treasury.

Any action that the Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to take pursuant to E.O. 14078 of July 19, 2022, and any further Executive orders relating to the national emergency declared therein, may be taken by the Director of OFAC or by any other person to whom the Secretary of the Treasury has delegated authority so to act.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2710 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 2710

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

     To provide for the conveyance of certain land in the State of 
                 California to the Hoopa Valley Tribe.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2710

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To provide for the conveyance of certain land in the State of 
                 California to the Hoopa Valley Tribe.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Hoopa Valley Reservation South 
Boundary Adjustment Act''.

SEC. 2. LAND TRANSFER TO RESERVATION.

    (a) In General.--All right, title, and interest of the United 
States in and to the lands described in subsection (b) shall hereafter 
be held in trust by the United States for the benefit of the Hoopa 
Valley Tribe and shall be part of the Hoopa Valley Reservation.
    (b) Lands Described.--The lands referred to in subsection (a) are 
those portions of Townships 7 North and 8 North, Ranges 5 East and 6 
East, Humboldt Meridian, California, within a boundary beginning at a 
point on the current south boundary of the Hoopa Valley Indian 
Reservation, marked and identified as ``Post H.V.R. No. 8'' on the Plat 
of the Hoopa Valley Indian Reservation prepared from a field survey 
conducted by C.T. Bissel, Augustus T. Smith and C.A. Robinson, Deputy 
Surveyors, approved by the Surveyor General, H. Pratt, March 18, 1892, 
and extending from said point on a bearing of north 72 degrees 30 
minutes east, until intersecting with a line beginning at a point 
marked as ``Post H.V.R. No. 3'' on said survey and extending on a 
bearing of south 15 degrees 59 minutes east, comprising 2,641 acres 
more or less.
    (c) Boundary Adjustment.--The boundary of the Six Rivers National 
Forest shall be adjusted to exclude the lands to be held in trust for 
the benefit of the Hoopa Valley Tribe pursuant to this section.

SEC. 3. SURVEY.

    The Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Bureau of Land 
Management, shall survey and monument that portion of the boundary of 
the Hoopa Valley Reservation established by the addition of lands made 
by section 2.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 10, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
§ 510.513 Official business of the United States Government. All transactions prohibited by this part that are for the conduct of the official business of the United States Government by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof are authorized. Note 1 to § 510.513 .
Section 510.213(e) exempts transactions for the conduct of the official business of the United States Government by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof to the extent such transactions are subject to the prohibitions contained in §§ 510.201(a)(1), (a)(3)(iv) through (vi), and (d), 510.206, and 510.208 through 510.211.
[87 FR 78471, Dec. 21, 2022]
#### § 546.101 Relation of this part to other laws and regulations.

This part is separate from, and independent of, the other parts of this chapter, with the exception of part 501 of this chapter, the recordkeeping and reporting requirements and license application and other procedures of which apply to this part. Actions taken pursuant to part 501 of this chapter with respect to the prohibitions contained in this part are considered actions taken pursuant to this part. Differing foreign policy and national security circumstances may result in differing interpretations of similar language among the parts of this chapter. No license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to those other parts authorizes any transaction prohibited by this part. No license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to any other provision of law or regulation authorizes any transaction prohibited by this part. No license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to this part relieves the involved parties from complying with any other applicable laws or regulations.
§ 552.407 Payments from blocked accounts to satisfy obligations prohibited. Pursuant to § 552.201, no debits may be made to a blocked account to pay obligations to U.S. persons or other persons, except as authorized by or pursuant to this part. Note 1 to § 552.407 .
*See also* § 552.502(e), which provides that no license or other authorization contained in or issued pursuant to this part authorizes transfers of or payments from blocked property or debits to blocked accounts unless the license or other authorization explicitly authorizes the transfer of or payment from blocked property or the debit to a blocked account.
www.gpo.gov

### §1a. Transfer of activities, employees, records, etc., from Bureau of Foreign and Domestic Commerce to the United States Bureau of Mines

There is hereby transferred from the Department of Commerce, Bureau of Foreign and Domestic Commerce, to the Department of the Interior, United States Bureau of Mines, all those activities of the Minerals Division of the Bureau of Foreign and Domestic Commerce concerned with economic and statistical analyses of mineral commodities, domestic and foreign, together with all employees, records, files, equipment, publications, and funds pertaining thereto, effective immediately.

(May 9, 1935, ch. 101, §1, 49 Stat. 205; Pub. L. 102–285, §10(b), May 18, 1992, 106 Stat. 172.)

#### Change of Name

“United States Bureau of Mines” substituted in text for “Bureau of Mines” pursuant to section 10(b) of Pub. L. 102–285, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.

#### Transfer of Functions

See note set out under section 1 of this title.
#### § 542.206 Prohibited new investment in Syria.

Except as otherwise authorized, new investment, as defined in § 542.315, in Syria by a United States person, wherever located, is prohibited.

[79 FR 25416, May 2, 2014, as amended at 89 FR 48317, June 6, 2024]
#### § 544.410 Setoffs prohibited.

A setoff against blocked property (including a blocked account), whether by a U.S. bank or other U.S. person, is a prohibited transfer under § 544.201 if effected after the effective date.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Expert Panel Report on Proactive Materials Degradation Assessment  (NUREG/CR-6923)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - Abstract, Foreword, Contents, Chapters 1-4
        - Appendix A through Appendix B.7
        - Appendix B.8 through Appendix C
        - Appendices D, E, and F 

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed: March 2006 Date Published: February 2007**

**Prepared by:** P.L. Andresen, General Electric Global Research Center F.P. Ford, General Electric Global Research Center (Retired) K. Gott, Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate, Sweden R.L. Jones, Electric Power Research Institute P.M. Scott, AREVA Framatome ANP, France T. Shoji, Tohoku University, Japan R. W. Staehle, Consultant R.L. Tapping, Atomic Energy Canada Ltd., Canada

**Technical Support:** M. Subudhi, Brookhaven National Laboratory

**Facilitator:** D.J. Diamond, Brookhaven National Laboratory

Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, NY 11973-5000

J. Muscara, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:**Division of Fuel, Engineering, and Radiological Research Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code Y6868

Availability Notice

## Abstract

 This study is part of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) Proactive Materials Degradation Assessment (PMDA) program. The main objective was to identify materials and components where future degradation may occur in specific light water reactor (LWR) systems. The approach was to use a structured elicitation drawing on the knowledge of a panel of eight experts and the use of a Phenomena Identification and Ranking Table (PIRT) process. The international panel was given information on the materials, fabrication process, and operational environment for hundreds of different parts of systems in a Westinghouse four-loop design pressurized water reactor and a BWR-5 design boiling water reactor. They considered extensions to other designs as well. The panel developed metrics and used them to evaluate the susceptibility of given parts to different degradation mechanisms as well as the level of understanding for the varying degradation mechanisms for the given part. Inherent in arriving at these judgments of future behavior was an understanding of the prediction methodologies for the various degradation phenomena, calibrated by the component failures that have occurred in the past in the global LWR fleet. Also taken into account were the successes and limitations of mitigation/control approaches that have been used to date. This report includes not only the panel's scoring and their rationale for it, and the conclusions derived from this process, but also considerable documentation of the relevant issues, the latter being found in appendices.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
#### § 548.302 Construction sector of the Belarus economy.

The term *construction sector of the Belarus economy* includes the production, procurement, devising, framing, design, testing, financing, distribution, or transport involving Belarus, of goods, services, or technology to fabricate, shape, alter, maintain, or form any buildings or structures, including the on-site development, assembly, or construction of residential, commercial, or institutional buildings in Belarus; and any related activities, including the provision or receipt of goods, services, or technology involving the construction sector of the Belarus economy.