alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 341.1 Description of bonds. ( a ) *Investment yield (interest).* United States Retirement Plan Bonds, hereinafter sometimes referred to as Retirement Plan Bonds, will be issued at par. The investment yields (interest) are as follows: ( 1 ) Bonds with issue dates of January 1, 1963, through May 1, 1966—3.75 percent per annum, compounded semiannually (see Table of Redemption Values in the appendix).
( 2 ) Bonds with issue dates of June 1, 1966, through December 1, 1969—4.15 percent per annum, compounded semiannually (see Table A in the appendix).
( 3 ) Bonds with issue dates of January 1, 1970, through January 1, 1974—5 percent per annum, compounded semiannually (see Table B).
( 4 ) Bonds with issue dates of February 1, 1974, through July 1, 1979—6 percent per annum, compounded semiannually (see Table C).
( 5 ) Bonds with issue dates of August 1, 1979, through October 1, 1980—6.5 percent per annum, compounded semiannually (see Table D).
( 6 ) Bonds with issue dates of November 1, 1980, through September 1, 1981—8 percent per annum, compounded semiannually (see Table E).
( 7 ) Bonds with issue dates of October 1, 1981, or thereafter—9 percent per annum, compounded semiannually (see Table F). Interest will be paid only upon redemption of the bonds. The accrual of interest will continue until the bonds are redeemed or have reached maturity, whichever is earlier, in accordance with these regulations.
( b ) *Term.* The maturity date of any bond issued under this circular shall be indeterminate, but unless sooner redeemed in accordance with the regulations in this part, its investment yield will cease on the interest accrual date coinciding with, or, where no such coincidence occurs, the interest accrual date next preceding, the first day of the sixtieth (60th) month following the date of death of the person in whose name it is registered.
( c ) *Denominations—issue date.* Retirement Plan Bonds will be available only in registered form and in denominations of $50, $100, $500, and $1,000. At the time of issue, the issuing agent will enter in the upper right-hand portion of the bond the issue date (which shall be the first day of the month and year in which payment of the purchase price is received by an authorized issuing agent), and will imprint the agent's validating stamp in the lower right-hand portion. The issue date, as distinguished from the date in the agent's validating stamp, will determine the date from which interest will begin to accrue on the bond. A Retirement Plan Bond shall be valid only if an authorized issuing agent receives payment therefor, duly inscribes, dates, stamps, and delivers it.
[28 FR 405, Jan. 16, 1963, as amended at 46 FR 60573, Dec. 11, 1981]
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

                In connection with the QuarterlyReport of TEPPCO Partners, L.P. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterended September 30, 2005 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Tracy E. Ohmart, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adoptedpursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

                1. The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and

 

                2. The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ TRACY E. OHMART                                            |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Tracy E. Ohmart                                                |   |
| Chief Financial Officer                                        |   |
| Texas Eastern Products Pipeline  Company, LLC, General Partner |
|                                                           |   |
| October 31, 2005                                               |   |
| Date                                                           |   |

 

Thiswritten statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionas an exhibit to such Form 10-Q.  Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to TEPPCO Partners, L.P. and will be retained by TEPPCO Partners, L.P.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

 

----
|   | (1) |   | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended                September 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as                amended                (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|-----|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) |   | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                     | OP-TECH                Environmental Services,                Inc. |                                                 |
|------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                                     |                                                               |                                                 |   |
| Date:                  November 14, 2007 | By:                                                                | /s/ Jon                S. Verbeck               |   |
|                                     |                                                               | Jon                S. Verbeck                        |   |
|                                     |                                                               | Chief                Financial Officer and Treasurer |   |
|                                     |                                                               |                                                 |   |
40395.

#### PIEDMONT ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION v. WRIGHT.

Decided November 14, 1963.

*Parks & Eisenberg, David S. Eisenberg,*for plaintiff in error.

*E. E. Moore, Jr., S. S. Robinson,*contra.

Felton, Chief Judge.

This is the second appearance of this ease in this court. The law of this case, insofar as the pleadings are concerned, was established in *Wright v. Piedmont Engineering &c. Corp.,*106 Ga. App. 401 (126 SE2d 865). The ease was tried by a judge without the intervention of a jury and judgment was entered for the defendant, Grady Wright. The only question necessary for decision is whether the evidence demanded the finding that the following provision in the addendum to the contract meant that the trust provision was not to be included *650in the warranty deed. The provision is as follows: “Grady Wright shall deed in trust, by warranty deed, to Petty Bregman the property . . .” The evidence presented by the plaintiff tends to show that at the time the addendum was executed both parties construed it to mean that the trust provision was not to be included in the warranty deed. The testimony of witnesses for the defendant was to the effect that the contention of the plaintiff above stated, as to the meaning of the addendum, was not correct but that it was clearly understood before and at the time of the execution of the addendum that the defendant insisted that the provision as to the trust should be embodied in the warranty deed and that the defendant, on the advice of his attorney, expressly refused to proceed further under the contract unless the trust provision was embodied in the warranty deed. Under the conflicting evidence the judge was authorized to find that the meaning of the quoted provision of the addendum was understood by the parties to be that it was their intention that the trust provision referred to in the addendum was to be embodied in a warranty deed to the plaintiff. No law has been cited to this court which shows that such a deed would be illegal or ineffective. The trial judge was authorized to find for the defendant. He did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Eberhardt and Bussell, JJ., concur.*
#### § 515.325 National securities exchange.

The term *national securities exchange* shall mean an exchange registered as a national securities exchange under section 6 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (48 Stat. 885, 15 U.S.C. 78f).
§ 536.203 Holding of funds in interest-bearing accounts; investment and reinvestment. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraphs (e) or (f) of this section, or as otherwise directed or authorized by OFAC, any U.S. person holding funds, such as currency, bank deposits, or liquidated financial obligations, subject to § 536.201 shall hold or place such funds in a blocked interest-bearing account located in the United States.
( b ) ( 1 ) For purposes of this section, the term *blocked interest-bearing account* means a blocked account: ( i ) In a federally insured U.S. bank, thrift institution, or credit union, provided the funds are earning interest at rates that are commercially reasonable; or
( ii ) With a broker or dealer registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a *et seq.*), provided the funds are invested in a money market fund or in U.S. Treasury bills.
( 2 ) Funds held or placed in a blocked account pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section may not be invested in instruments the maturity of which exceeds 180 days.
( c ) For purposes of this section, a rate is commercially reasonable if it is the rate currently offered to other depositors on deposits or instruments of comparable size and maturity.
( d ) For purposes of this section, if interest is credited to a separate blocked account or subaccount, the name of the account party on each account must be the same.
( e ) Blocked funds held in instruments the maturity of which exceeds 180 days at the time the funds become subject to § 536.201 may continue to be held until maturity in the original instrument, provided any interest, earnings, or other proceeds derived therefrom are paid into a blocked interest-bearing account in accordance with paragraphs (a) or (f) of this section.
( f ) Blocked funds held in accounts or instruments outside the United States at the time the funds become subject to § 536.201 may continue to be held in the same type of accounts or instruments, provided the funds earn interest at rates that are commercially reasonable.
( g ) This section does not create an affirmative obligation for the holder of blocked tangible property, such as real or personal property, or of other blocked property, such as debt or equity securities, to sell or liquidate such property. However, OFAC may issue licenses permitting or directing such sales or liquidation in appropriate cases.
( h ) Funds subject to this section may not be held, invested, or reinvested in a manner that provides financial or economic benefit or access to a specially designated narcotics trafficker, nor may their holder cooperate in or facilitate the pledging or other attempted use as collateral of blocked funds or other assets.
[86 FR 26663, May 17, 2021]
#### § 539.304 Entity owned or controlled by a designated foreign person.

The term *entity owned or controlled by a designated foreign person* includes any subsidiaries and branches, wherever located, of entities that are designated foreign persons, any successors to such entities, and any persons acting or purporting to act for or on behalf of any of the foregoing.

[64 FR 8716, Feb. 23, 1999, as amended at 86 FR 73106, Dec. 27, 2021]
HomeBiographies...Matthew Graviss

# 				Dr. Matthew Graviss			

															Chief Data and Artificial Intelligence Officer						Office of Management Strategy and Solutions												

				December 1, 2020 -									Present							

In December 2020, Dr. Matthew Graviss became the Chief Data and Artificial Intelligence Officer of the Department of State. In this role, Dr. Graviss is responsible for making data accessible, interoperable, and actionable across the Department of State. He also serves as the Managing Director for the Office of Management Strategy and Solution’s Center for Analytics (CfA), which aims to imbue the Department with a data focused culture and corresponding talent, advance data governance, expand analytics capability, and modernize data technology solutions.

Prior to joining the State Department, Dr. Graviss spent 13 years in leadership positions at the Department of Homeland Security, as well as time in the private sector. Most recently, Dr. Graviss spent two and a half years as the first Chief Data Officer at U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services within DHS, where he led data management and analytics services for USCIS’ 20,000 person workforce. 

Graviss holds a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from Auburn University, a master’s degree in mechanical engineering from Texas A&M University, and a doctorate in systems engineering from George Washington University. He is a Level 3 certified acquisition professional in program management, systems engineering, and test and evaluation. He is also a graduate of American University’s Key Executive Leadership program.

Tags

Office of Management Strategy and SolutionsState Department Official

Back to Top
#### Frances A. Smith *vs.*John A. Crilly, Jr.

First Judicial District, Hartford,

March Term, 1926.

Wheeler, C. J., Curtis, Maltbie, Haines and Hinman, Js.

Argued March 2d

decided April 8th, 1926.

Action to recover damages for personal injuries, alleged to have been caused by defendant’s negligence, brought to the Superior Court in Hartford County and tried to the jury before *Simpson, J.;*verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $4,000, and appeal by defendant.

*No error.*

*Thomas Hewes,*with whom was *Richard H. Phillips,*for the appellant (defendant).

*James B. Henry,*for the appellee (plaintiff).

*740Per Curiam.

The plaintiff claimed to have proved that the injuries for which she seeks to recover damages occurred in an automobile accident and were caused by the failure of the defendant’s wife in driving his car to keep it under control in consequence of the excessive speed at which, and the manner in which, she was driving. The defendant claimed to have proved that the cause of the failure of his wife to keep the car under control was due to the binding of the steering mechanism of the car, thus causing it to become rigid. The jury might reasonably have found either theory proven, and therefore the trial court was without power to have granted defendant’s motion and set aside the verdict.

There is no error.
# L_2021382EN.01005801.xml

| 28.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 382/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 382/58

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) 2020/192 of 12 February 2020 amending Annexes II and III to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for prochloraz in or on certain products

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 40 of 13 February 2020
  )

On pages 16 and 17, in one instance each:

for:

‘[Office of Publication: please insert date 2 years after publication]’,

read:

‘
  13 February 2022
  ’

---
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 370.15 What limitations exist on liability? ( a ) We may rely on the information provided by you or anyone else authorized to provide information concerning your financial institution or deposit account to which payments are to be made. We do not need to verify this information. We are not liable for any action we may take in reliance on the information furnished.
( b ) Our liability does not extend beyond the amount of the payment due.
( c ) When you name a financial institution to receive payments on your behalf, you are appointing that institution as your agent for the receipt of payments. When a credit entry is made to your financial institution for deposit to your account following your instructions, we no longer have any further responsibility for that payment. Where your financial institution has arranged with the Federal Reserve Bank to have payments made through another financial institution, the crediting of your payment to that institution relieves us of any further responsibility for that payment.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-09-00095-CV

In re Mycal Antoine Poole a/k/a :Mycal-Antoine:Poole. 

and John Crawford Williams a/k/a :John-Crawford:Williams.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM WILLIAMSON COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

 

J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Henson

Filed: February 25, 2009
www.gpo.gov

### §4c. Investigation of sub-bituminous and lignite coal

The United States Bureau of Mines, under the general direction of the Secretary of the Interior, is authorized to conduct investigations, studies, and experiments on its own initiative and in cooperation with individuals, State institutions, laboratories, and other organizations, with a view to (1) the development of a commercially practicable carbonization method of processing sub-bituminous and lignite coal so as to convert such coal into an all-purpose fuel, to provide fertilizers, and obtain such other byproducts thereof as may be commercially valuable; (2) the development of efficient methods, equipment, and devices for burning lignite or char therefrom; and (3) determining and developing methods for more efficient utilization of such sub-bituminous and lignite coal for purposes of generating electric power.

(May 15, 1936, ch. 397, §1, 49 Stat. 1275; Pub. L. 102–285, §10(b), May 18, 1992, 106 Stat. 172.)

#### Change of Name

“United States Bureau of Mines” substituted in text for “Bureau of Mines” pursuant to section 10(b) of Pub. L. 102–285, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.

#### Transfer of Functions

See note set out under section 1 of this title.

#### Section Referred to in Other Sections

This section is referred to in section 4d of this title.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 347.11 Crediting of retirement savings bond.

Each retirement savings bond issued to the IRA custodian must be credited to a single Roth IRA established through Treasury's retirement savings program with the custodian.

[82 FR 6246, Jan. 19, 2017]
HomeBiographies...Eric Jacobstein

# 				Eric Jacobstein			

															Deputy Assistant Secretary For Central America						Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs												

				June 26, 2023 -									Present							

Tags

Bureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsState Department Official

Back to Top
#### § 535.413 Transfers between dollar accounts held for foreign banks.

Transfers authorized by § 535.901 include transfers by order of a non-Iranian foreign bank from its account in a domestic bank (directly or through a foreign branch or subsidiary of a domestic bank) to an account held by a domestic bank (directly or through a foreign branch or subsidiary) for a second non-Iranian foreign bank which in turn credits an account held by it abroad for Iran. For the purposes of this section, a non-Iranian foreign bank means a bank which is not a person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.

[44 FR 66833, Nov. 21, 1979]
HomeBiographies...Leah Bray

# 				Leah Bray			

															Acting Coordinator						Global Engagement Center												

				July 1, 2021 -									Present							

Tags

Global Engagement CenterState Department Official

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>



<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2001
<CASH>                                       7,822,681
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,237,574
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,346,085
<PP&E>                                      27,948,737
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,736,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              51,561,970
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,221,342
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        164
<COMMON>                                        49,436
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,762,320
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                51,561,970
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,251,805
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,820,559
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             605,180
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (548,424)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,305
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (561,729)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (561,729)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13








</TABLE>
§ 34.103 Allocation of funds. The amounts in the Trust Fund are allocated among the programs in § 34.1. ( a ) Available funds in the Trust Fund, other than interest, are allocated as follows: ( 1 ) Thirty-five percent in equal shares for the Gulf Coast States to be used for the Direct Component of the Gulf RESTORE Program. Section 34.302 describes the allocation for each Gulf Coast State.
( 2 ) Thirty percent for the Council to be used for the Comprehensive Plan Component of the Gulf RESTORE Program.
( 3 ) Thirty percent for formula distribution to Gulf Coast States to be used for the Spill Impact Component of the Gulf RESTORE Program.
( 4 ) Two and one-half percent to be used for the NOAA RESTORE Act Science Program.
( 5 ) Two and one-half percent in equal shares for the Gulf Coast States to be used for the Centers of Excellence Research Grants Program.
( b ) Within ten days of the close of a Federal fiscal year, available funds equal to the interest earned on the Trust Fund investments will be allocated, as follows: ( 1 ) Twenty-five percent to be used for the NOAA RESTORE Act Science Program.
( 2 ) Twenty-five percent for the Centers of Excellence Research Grants Program.
( 3 ) Fifty percent for the Comprehensive Plan Component of the Gulf RESTORE Program.