alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,042,765
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   66,004
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,108,769
<PP&E>                                      13,167,169
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,095,173
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,233,081
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          144,268
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,088,813
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,233,081
<SALES>                                      2,803,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,025,687
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,225,708
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (200,021)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (200,021)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (200,021)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (6.66)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (6.66)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 34.300 General.

This subpart describes the policies and procedures applicable to the Direct Component of the Gulf RESTORE Program. The funds made available under this subpart will be in the form of a grant.
§ 29.526 Waiver precluded. Waivers will not be offered or granted when— ( 1 ) The overpayment was obtained by fraud, misrepresentation, or by improper negotiation of checks or withdrawal of electronic fund transfer payments after the death of the payee; or
( 2 ) The overpayment was made to an estate and a timely demand for repayment is made prior to the final disbursement by the administrator or executor of the estate.
#### § 515.407 Administration of blocked estates of decedents.

With respect to transactions incident to the administration of the blocked estate of a decedent, including the appointment and qualification of personal representatives, the collection and liquidation of assets, the payment of claims, and distribution to beneficiaries, attention is directed to § 515.523, which authorizes all transactions incident to the administration and distribution of the assets of blocked estates of decedents.

[80 FR 56919, Sept. 21, 2015]
#### § 535.801 Procedures.

For license application procedures and procedures relating to amendments, modifications, or revocations of licenses; administrative decisions; rulemaking; and requests for documents pursuant to the Freedom of Information and Privacy Acts (5 U.S.C. 552 and 552a), see part 501, subpart E, of this chapter.

[62 FR 45107, Aug. 25, 1997, as amended at 68 FR 53657, Sept. 11, 2003]
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1170

AN ACT

To provide that an application for an injunction reheard and determined by a 3-judge court. tutionality of such law unless the application is not be granted on the ground of the unconsti- tion of a State law adopted by referendum may straining the enforcement, operation, or execu-
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1170

AN ACT

To provide that an application for an injunction restraining

the enforcement, operation, or execution of a State law

adopted by referendum may not be granted on the

ground of the unconstitutionality of such law unless the

application is heard and determined by a 3-judge court.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1170 EH

1 SECTION 1. 3-JUDGE COURT FOR CERTAIN INJUNCTIONS.

2 Any application for an interlocutory or permanent in3 junction restraining the enforcement, operation, or execu4 tion of a State law adopted by referendum shall not be

5 granted by a United States district court or judge thereof

6 upon the ground of the unconstitutionality of such State

7 law unless the application for the injunction is heard and

8 determined by a court of 3 judges in accordance with sec9 tion 2284 of title 28, United States Code. Any appeal of

10 a determination on such application shall be to the Su11 preme Court. In any case to which this section applies,

12 the additional judges who will serve on the 3-judge court

13 shall be designated under section 2284(b)(1) of title 28,

14 United States Code, as soon as practicable, and the court

15 shall expedite the consideration of the application for an

16 injunction.

17 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

18 As used in this Act—

19 (1) the term ‘‘State’’ means each of the several

20 States and the District of Columbia;

21 (2) the term ‘‘State law’’ means the constitu22 tion of a State, or any statute, ordinance, rule, regu23 lation, or other measure of a State that has the

24 force of law, and any amendment thereto; and

25 (3) the term ‘‘referendum’’ means the submis26 sion to popular vote of a measure passed upon or
3

•HR 1170 EH

1 proposed by a legislative body or by popular initia2 tive.

3 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

4 This Act applies to any application for an injunction

5 that is filed on or after the date of the enactment of this

6 Act.

Passed the House of Representatives September 28,

1995.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### § 548.307 Entity.

The term *entity* means a partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization.
IB

House Calendar No. 161

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2556

[Report No. 104–418]

To redesignate the Federal building located at 345 Middlefield Road in

Menlo Park, California, and known as the Earth Sciences and Library

Building, as the ‘‘Vincent E. McKelvey Federal Building’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 30, 1995

Ms. ESHOO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Transportation and Infrastructure

DECEMBER 18 (legislative day, DECEMBER 15), 1995

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To redesignate the Federal building located at 345 Middlefield Road in Menlo Park, California, and known as

the Earth Sciences and Library Building, as the ‘‘Vincent E. McKelvey Federal Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2556 RH

1 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

2 The Federal building located at 345 Middlefield

3 Road, in Menlo Park, California, and known as the Earth

4 Sciences and Library Building, shall be known and des5 ignated as the ‘‘Vincent E. McKelvey Federal Building’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

9 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

10 a reference to the ‘‘Vincent E. McKelvey Federal Build11 ing’’.

House Calendar No. 161

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2556

[Report No. 104–418]

A BILL

To redesignate the Federal building located at 345

D

Building’’.ing, as the ‘‘Vincent E. McKelvey Federalknown as the Earth Sciences and Library BuildMiddlefield Road in Menlo Park, California, and

ECEMBER 18 (legislative day, DECEMBER 15), 1995

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
#### § 19.720 How may I contest a suspension?

If you as a respondent wish to contest a suspension, you or your representative must provide the suspending official with information in opposition to the suspension. You may do this orally or in writing, but any information provided orally that you consider important must also be submitted in writing for the official record.
Exhibit 10.3


[LOGO]  Fidelity National Title              TITLE ORDER NO.____________________
          Insurance Company                  ESCROW NO._________________________


                           UNSECURED PROMISSORY NOTE
                        (Installment-Interest Separate)


$10,000.00               San Diego, California,             June 16, 2012


I promise to pay to "S" Douglas Henderson or order, at San Diego, CA the sum of
Ten thousand and no/100 DOLLARS, with interest from June 16, 2012 on unpaid
principal at the rate of 4 (four) per cent per annum, payable on the 16th day of
June, 2014.

Should default be made in payment of any installment of principal or interest
when due the whole sum of principal and interest shall become immediately due at
the option of the holder of this note. Principal and interest payable in lawful
money of the United States. If action be instituted on this note I promise to
pay such sum as the Court may fix as attorney's fees.


                                            FreeFlow, Inc.


                                            /s/ "S" Douglas Henderson
                                            --------------------------------
                                            "S" Douglas Henderson, President
#### In the Matter of Karen E. Meinzer, a Suspended Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee of the Eighth Judicial District, Petitioner.

[803 NYS2d 475]

Order of disbarment entered. Memorandum: Respondent’s unexcused failure to appear or answer the petition constitutes a default *(see Matter of Wedlock,*230 AD2d 422 [1997]; *see also Matter of Frank,*9 AD3d 916 [2004]; *Matter of Cary,*7 AD3d 24 [2004]; *Matter of Gaesser,*6 AD3d 1246 [2004]). Present—Green, J.P., Scudder, Gorski, Pine and Hayes, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [WY-923-1310-FI; WYW144810]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of proposed reinstatement of terminated oil and gas lease.

# SUMMARY:

                        Under the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 3108.2-3(a) and (b)(2), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for reinstatement from                               ( print page 42686)                            Anadarko Petroleum Corporation and Lance Oil & Gas Company for noncompetitive oil and gas lease WYW144810 for land in Johnson County, Wyoming. The petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due since the date the lease terminated under the law.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management, Carmen E. Lovett, Land Law Examiner, at (307) 775-6160.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The lessees have agreed to the amended lease terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10.00 per acre or fraction thereof, per year and 18                    2/3                     percent, respectively. The lessees have paid the required $500 administrative fee and $163 to reimburse the Department for the cost of this                     **Federal Register**                     notice. The lessees have met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in sections 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to reinstate lease WYW144810 effective April 1, 2009, under the original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above. BLM has not issued a valid lease affecting the lands.                

Carmen E. Lovett,

Land Law Examiner.

[FR Doc. E9-20324 Filed 8-21-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
HomeBiographies...Aaron Keyak

# 				Aaron Keyak			

															Deputy Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Antisemitism						Office of the Special Envoy To Monitor and Combat Antisemitism												

				November 22, 2021 -									Present							

Aaron Keyak currently serves as the Deputy Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Antisemitism at the U.S. Department of State. In helping lead this office, he works to advance U.S. foreign policy to counter antisemitism throughout the world.

Deputy Special Envoy Keyak is an experienced leader and interfaith coalition builder who has previously held senior roles advising members of Congress, the Obama Administration, and the Biden-Harris Administration transition team.

As an accomplished foreign policy hand and publicist, he has counseled various members of Congress and served as the top Middle East adviser and Communications Director for Representatives Jerry Nadler and Steve Rothman. Deputy Special Envoy Keyak serves as a term member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and was selected as a Truman National Security Project scholar. He earned his Bachelor’s degree with honors from Washington University in St. Louis.

Tags

Office of the Special Envoy To Monitor and Combat AntisemitismState Department Official

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 315.83 Reissue or payment on dissolution of corporation or partnership. ( a ) *Corporations.* A bond registered in the name of a private corporation which is in the process of dissolution will be paid to the authorized representative of the corporation upon a request for payment, supported by satisfactory evidence of the representative's authority. At the termination of dissolution proceedings, the bond may be reissued upon the request of the authorized representative in the names of those persons, other than creditors, entitled to the assets of the corporation, to the extent of their respective interests. Proof will be required that all statutory provisions governing the dissolution of the corporation have been complied with and that the persons in whose names reissue is requested are entitled and have agreed to the reissue. If the dissolution proceedings are under the direction of a court, a certified copy of an order of the court, showing the authority of the representative to make the distribution requested must be furnished.
( b ) *Partnerships.* A bond registered in the name of a partnership which has been dissolved by death or withdrawal of a partner, or in any other manner— ( 1 ) Will be paid upon a request for payment by any partner or partners authorized by law to act on behalf of the dissolved partnership, or
( 2 ) Will be paid to or reissued in the names of the persons entitled as the result of such dissolution to the extent of their respective interests, except that reissue will not be made in the names of creditors.
The request must be supported by satisfactory evidence of entitlement, including proof that the debts of the partnership have been paid or properly provided for. The appropriate form should be used.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Meredith Enterprises, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the
period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles P. Wingard, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:  November 12, 2004 |  | /s/   Charles P. Wingard
|------------------------ |  | ------------------------
|                         |  | Charles P. Wingard      
|                         |  | Chief Financial Officer
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

###### Editorial Note on Part 363

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 363 appear at 70 FR 57433, Sept. 30, 2005, 70 FR 57442, Sept. 30, 2005, and 75 FR 70815, Nov. 19, 2010.

#### § 363.18 Is Fiscal Service liable if the electronic transmission of my data is intercepted?

We are not liable for any interception of electronic data or communication.

[67 FR 64286, Oct. 17, 2002. Redesignated at 70 FR 57434, Sept. 30, 2005]
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 355.13 Are there any additional requirements related to fiscal agency checks?

We may require an indemnification agreement, with or without surety. You must provide any additional evidence we consider necessary. We will require any information necessary for the protection of the interests of the United States.
www.gpo.gov

### §3417. Assignment of Federal personnel to State Indian economic development programs

Any State with an economic development program targeted to Indian tribes shall be eligible to receive, at no cost to the State, such Federal personnel assignments as the Secretary, in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Intergovernmental Personnel Act of 1970 [42 U.S.C. 4701 et seq.], may deem appropriate to help ensure the success of such program.

(Pub. L. 102–477, §18, Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2306.)

#### References in Text

The Intergovernmental Personnel Act of 1970, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 91–648, Jan. 5, 1971, 84 Stat. 1909, as amended, which enacted sections 3371 to 3376 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, and chapter 62 (§4701 et seq.) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, amended section 1304 of Title 5 and section 246 of Title 42, repealed sections 1881 to 1888 of Title 7, Agriculture, and section 869b of Title 20, Education, and enacted provisions set out as notes under section 3371 of Title 5. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4701 of Title 42 and Tables.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 245.6 Claim by an indorser.

When one or more Treasury checks are lost, stolen or destroyed in a single incident while in the possession of a person to whom the checks have been negotiated by the payee, and if the checks have not been paid, the Commissioner may issue a replacement check to the person to whom the checks had been negotiated.
IIA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 255

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

DECEMBER 6, 1995

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

AN ACT

To designate the Federal Justice Building in Miami, Florida,

as the ‘‘James Lawrence King Federal Justice Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Federal Justice Building located at 99 Northeast

5 Fourth Street in Miami, Florida, shall be known and des-
2

HR 255 RFS

1 ignated as the ‘‘James Lawrence King Federal Justice

2 Building’’.

3 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

4 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

5 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

6 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

7 a reference to the ‘‘James Lawrence King Federal Justice

8 Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives December 5,

1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.

By LINDA NAVE,

Deputy Clerk.