alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Trover Solutions, Inc. (the
"Corporation") for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certifies
that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.



/s/ Patrick B. McGinnis
-----------------------------------------------
Patrick B. McGinnis
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
August 13, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Trover Solutions, Inc. and will be retained by Trover Solutions,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

<PAGE>

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Trover Solutions, Inc. (the
"Corporation") for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the
Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certifies that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.



/s/ Douglas R. Sharps
----------------------------------------------------
Douglas R. Sharps
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
August 13, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Trover Solutions, Inc. and will be retained by Trover Solutions,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### § 552.601 Records and reports.

For provisions relating to required records and reports, see part 501, subpart C, of this chapter. Recordkeeping and reporting requirements imposed by part 501 of this chapter with respect to the prohibitions contained in this part are considered requirements arising pursuant to this part.
PeninsularAerial Services, LLC 2445 Pimlico Lane Melbourne, FL 32934 February 10, 2015
Docket Management Facility U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Ave SE West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 Washington, D.C. 20590
On January 27 2015 I submitted a Petition for Exemption on behalfofPeninsular Aerial Services. That petitionwas assigned the following Docket ID: FAA-2015- 0189. Since submitting this petition I have realized quiet a bit ofrelevant information was omitted. I am requesting for this petition to be withdrawn in order to submit a more complete petition at a later date. Please feel free to contact me ifyou have any questions

### :hank~~?

# /~~ PeninsularAerial Services, LLC 702-604-5439 -, ·; ·._-_.,

'··
§ 539.704 Penalty imposition or withdrawal. ( a ) *No violation.* If, after considering any response to a prepenalty notice and any relevant facts, the Director of the Office of Foreign Assets Control determines that there was no violation by the respondent named in the prepenalty notice, the Director promptly shall notify the respondent in writing of that determination and that no monetary penalty will be imposed.
( b ) *Violation.* If, after considering any response to a prepenalty notice and any relevant facts, the Director of the Office of Foreign Assets Control determines that there was a violation by the respondent named in the prepenalty notice, the Director promptly shall issue a written notice of the imposition of the monetary penalty to the respondent. ( 1 ) The penalty notice shall inform the respondent that payment of the assessed penalty must be made within 30 days of the date of mailing of the penalty notice.
( 2 ) The penalty notice shall inform the respondent of the requirement to furnish the respondent's taxpayer identification number pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 7701 and that such number will be used for purposes of collecting and reporting on any delinquent penalty amount.
#### Josefa de García, Plaintiff and Appellant, *v.*Figueroa & Gautier, Augusto Gautier Mandry and the Great American Indemnity Company, Defendants and Appellees.

No. 7343.

Argued December 10, 1937.

Decided March 29, 1938.

*II. Torres Sold*for appellant. *J. Valldejuli Rodriguez*for appellees.

Mr. Justice Wolf

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The plaintiff and appellant, Josefa de García, brought a tort action in the District Court of San Juan, against the firm of Figueroa & Gautier, Augusto Gautier Mandry and .the Great American Indemnity Co., to recover the damages resulting from an accident. She alleged that she was injured by an automobile belonging to Figueroa *&*Gautier while the *866same was being negligently driven by one of the partners, Augusto Gautier Mandry. The Great American Indemnity Co. was joined as the insurer *of*the firm Figueroa *&*Gautier. After a trial, the lower court dismissed the complaint without costs.

A careful reading of the transcript of the evidence has convinced us that the facts found by the trial court with regard to the manner in which the accident occurred are supported by the preponderance of the evidence. The court found that on the day of the accident, Josefa de García was about to cross Ponce de León Avenue from north to south at a point more or less in front of the Capitol Building; that she came out on the street from the front of an automobile which was parked on the same side of the avenue looking towards San Juan; that the defendant, Augusto Gautier, was driving a car in the direction of San Juan, well to his right and at a slow rate of speed; that at the very moment in which the defendant’s- car was travelling past the parked vehicle, the plaintiff stepped out and in front of defendant making it' absolutely impossible for him to stop in túne to avoid striking her, but that he realized the moment when the front right wheel ran over the plaintiff and then stopped the car; that defendant then took plaintiff to the nearest hospital and had her attended to by a doctor.

The lower court absolved the defendant of any negligence and intimated that whatever negligence existed should be charged against' the plaintiff herself.

Appellant assigns three errors with regard to the analysis of the evidence and the final decision of the court. The case, in our opinion, does not merit a discussion of any portion of the transcript of the evidence, inasmuch as we feel that' there is no real basis on which to alter the judge’s findings of fact. None of the errors assigned were committed. *We*agree with the lower court’s statement', as follows:

> *867“The evidence as a whole shows that this was an unfortunate accident, for which the defendant are not responsible, and, therefore, the proper judgment is one dismissing the complaint without costs.”

The judgment appealed from should be affirmed.

Mr. Justice Córdova Dávila took no part in the decision of this case.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 11

                          URETHANE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

The computation of net loss per share for the quarter and nine month period
ended September 30, 1996 is as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   Quarter ended        Nine months ended
                                                                September 30, 1996     September 30, 1996
                                                                -------------------     ------------------
<S>                                                             <C>                     <C>
PRIMARY:
--------

Net Loss                                                        ($2,631,533)            ($3,358,201)
                                                                ===========             ===========
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding             10,630,737              10,503,436

Dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding                            --                      --
                                                                 ----------             -----------
Average number of common shares outstanding
 on a primary basis                                                  ($0.25)                 ($0.32)
                                                                ===========             ===========

FULLY DILUTED:
--------------

Net Loss                                                        ($2,631,533)            ($3,358,201)
                                                                ===========             ===========
Weighted average number of common 
 shares outstanding                                              10,630,737              10,503,436

Dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding                            --                      --
                                                                -----------             -----------
Average number of common shares outstanding
 on a fully diluted basis                                        10,630,737              10,503,436
                                                                ===========             ===========

Net loss per share on a fully diluted basis                          ($0.25)                 ($0.32)
                                                                ===========             ===========

</TABLE>
GAO/AIMD-00-222R National Society Daughters of the American Colonists

United States General Accounting Office

Washington, DC 20548

Accounting and Information

Management Division

B-285348

June 16, 2000

The Honorable Henry J. Hyde

Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary

House of Representatives

Subject: Federally Chartered Corporation: Review of the Financial Statement Audit

Report for the National Society Daughters of the American Colonists for Fiscal

Year 1999

Dear Mr. Chairman:

As requested, we reviewed the audit report covering the financial statements of the National

Society Daughters of the American Colonists, a federally chartered corporation, for the fiscal

year ended February 28, 1999. The corporation provides scholarships and awards, publishes

a yearbook, and participates in a variety of patriotic projects.

Federally chartered corporations are required under 36 U.S.C. 10101 to

• present the corporation’s assets and liabilities and reasonable detail on the corporation’s

income and expenses in annual financial statements,

• obtain an annual financial audit by an independent public accountant, and

• submit the auditor’s report and the corporation’s financial statements to the Congress.

The objective of our review was to determine whether the audit report complied with the

financial reporting requirements of the law. In carrying out our work, we reviewed the

corporation’s financial statements and the accompanying notes, performed certain analytical

procedures related to information presented in the financial statements, reviewed the

auditor’s report, and made inquiries to corporation officials or the auditor as we deemed

necessary. We did not review the auditor’s working papers. Our review disclosed no

reportable instances of noncompliance.
B-285348

Page 2 GAO/AIMD-00-222R National Society Daughters of the American Colonists

The audit report included the auditor’s opinion that the financial statements of the

corporation were presented fairly, in all material respects, in accordance with generally

accepted accounting principles. We are returning the audit report you sent with your letter.

Sincerely yours,

David L. Clark

Director, Audit Oversight and Liaison

w/o Enclosure

(911977)
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ARMANDO LUNA, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 14

- 00037

- CR

Appeal from

Criminal District Court No. 5

of Dallas County, Texas

(TC # F

- 1162422

- L)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 1 3 TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2015.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, J., and Barajas, C.J., (Senior Judge)

(Barajas, C.J., Senior Judge, sitting by assignment, not participating)
#### § 535.311 Property; property interests.

Except as defined in § 535.203(f) for the purposes of that section, the terms *property* and *property interest* or *property interests* shall include, but not by way of limitation, money, checks, drafts, bullion, bank deposits, savings accounts, debts, indebtedness, obligations, notes, debentures, stocks, bonds, coupons, any other financial securities, bankers' acceptances, mortgages, pledges, liens or other rights in the nature of security, warehouse receipts, bills of lading, trust receipts, bills of sale, any other evidences of title, ownership or indebtedness, powers of attorney, goods, wares, merchandise, chattels, stocks on hand, ships, goods on ships, real estate mortgages, deeds of trust, vendors' sales agreements, land contracts, real estate and any interest therein, leaseholds, grounds rents, options, negotiable instruments, trade acceptances, royalties, book accounts, accounts payable, judgments, patents, trademarks or copyrights, insurance policies, safe deposit boxes and their contents, annuities, pooling agreements, contracts of any nature whatsoever, and any other property, real, personal, or mixed, tangible or intangible, or interest or interests therein, present, future or contingent.
§ 53.6694-3 Penalty for understatement due to willful, reckless, or intentional conduct. ( a ) *In general.* A person who is a tax return preparer of any return or claim for refund of tax under Chapter 42 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) shall be subject to penalties under section 6694(b) of the Code in the manner stated in § 1.6694-3 of this chapter.
( b ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section is applicable to returns and claims for refund filed, and advice provided, after December 31, 2008.
[T.D. 9436, 73 FR 78457, Dec. 22, 2008]
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

SIMEON WASHINGTON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

Nos. 4D18-588 and 4D18-589

[July 12, 2018]

Appeal of order denying 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the 

Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Okeechobee County; Michael C. Heisey, 

Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 472005CF000344A and 472006CF000784A.

Simeon Washington, Indiantown, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
HomeBiographies...Hugo Rodriguez

# 				Hugo Rodriguez			

															Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary						Bureau of Consular Affairs												

				February 1, 2023 -									Present							

Hugo F. Rodriguez, Jr. joined the Bureau of Consular Affairs as the Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary on February 13, 2023.  Ambassador Rodriguez previously served in the Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Mexico, Central America, and Migration from April 2019 to January 2021 and as Acting Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary until December 2021.  He was nominated by President Biden as Ambassador to the Republic of Nicaragua and confirmed in September 2022.  His previous assignments include Deputy Chief of Mission and Chargé d’Affairs in Asuncion, Paraguay; Consul General in Mexico City, Mexico; and tours of duty in Lima, Peru; Rome, Italy; the Overseas Citizens Service Directorate in Consular Affairs, and two tours in the State Department Operations Center.  Ambassador Rodriguez is a career Senior Foreign Service officer and joined the State Department in 2000.  

Tags

Bureau of Consular AffairsState Department Official

Back to Top
HomeBureau of Cyberspace and Digital Policy...Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital Policy 2  Releases

# Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital Policy Releases

104 items

        -    Media Note  		Ambassador Fick and Director Easterly’s Travel to Ukraine and Poland	  February 9, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Announcement of a Visa Restriction Policy to Promote Accountability for the Misuse of Commercial Spyware	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 5, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Designating Iranian Cyber Officials	  Matthew MillerFebruary 2, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Ambassador Fick’s Travel to Singapore	  January 31, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Ambassador (Ret.) McCarthy Leads US Delegation at Negotiating Session on UN Cybercrime Convention	  January 29, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Deputy Secretary for Management and Resources Verma’s Trip to  Australia, Fiji, and Indonesia	  January 26, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		7th U.S.-ROK Cyber Policy Consultations	  January 24, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Welcoming the First Subsea Cable Between South America and the Indo-Pacific Region	  January 11, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Formalization of the Tallinn Mechanism to Coordinate Civilian Cyber Assistance to Ukraine	  December 20, 2023 
        -    Media Note  		U.S. Department of State Leads Successful U.S. Delegation to World Radiocommunication Conference in Dubai	  December 15, 2023 

previous page12345…11next page

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 210.12 RDFI's rights of recovery. ( a ) *Matters between the RDFI and its customer.* This subpart does not authorize or direct an RDFI to debit or otherwise affect the account of a recipient. Nothing in this subpart shall be construed to affect the right an RDFI has under state law or the RDFI's contract with a recipient to recover any amount from the recipient's account.
( b ) *Liability unaffected.* The liability of the RDFI under this subpart is not affected by actions taken by the RDFI to recover any portion of the outstanding total from any party.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 205.14 When does Federal interest liability accrue? ( a ) Federal interest liabilities may accrue in accordance with the following provisions: ( 1 ) The Federal Program Agency incurs interest liability if a State pays out its own funds for Federal assistance program purposes with valid obligational authority under Federal law, Federal regulation, or Federal-State agreement. A Federal interest liability will accrue from the day a State pays out its own funds for Federal assistance program purposes to the day Federal funds are credited to a State bank account.
( 2 ) If a State pays out its own funds for Federal assistance program purposes without obligational authority, the Federal Program Agency will incur an interest liability if obligational authority subsequently is established. However, if the lack of obligational authority is the result of the failure of the State to comply with a Federal Program Agency requirement established by statute, regulation, or agreement, interest liability may be denied. A Federal interest liability will accrue from the day a State pays out its own funds for Federal assistance program purposes to the day Federal funds are credited to a State bank account.
( 3 ) If a State pays out its own funds prior to the day a Federal Program Agency officially notifies the State in writing that a discretionary grant project is approved, the Federal Program Agency does not incur an interest liability, notwithstanding any other provision of this section.
( 4 ) If a State pays out its own funds prior to the availability of Federal funds authorized or appropriated for a future Federal fiscal year, the Federal Program Agency does not incur an interest liability, notwithstanding any other provision of this section.
( 5 ) If a State fails to request funds timely as set forth in § 205.29, or otherwise fails to apply a funding technique properly, we may deny any resulting Federal interest liability, notwithstanding any other provision of this section.
( b ) Federal Program Agency programs that have specific payment dates set by the Federal Program Agency that create interest liabilities are subject to this part.
( c ) States must adhere to Federal Program Agency disbursement schedules when requesting funds. Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, we may deny a State's claim for Federal interest liability for the period prior to a late drawdown request. States must time their funds drawdown so that it does not create Federal interest liability. The drawdown request must allow the Federal Program Agency sufficient time to meet its disbursement schedule. If the Federal Program Agency does not make a timely payout in accordance with the terms of the Treasury-State agreement, a State may submit a claim for interest liability.
##### 



EXHIBIT 21

Subsidiaries of the Partnership

TEPPCO Partners, L.P. (Delaware)

TEPPCO GP, Inc. (Delaware)
TE Products Pipeline Company, Limited Partnership (Delaware)
TEPPCO Colorado, LLC (Delaware)
TEPPCO Midstream Companies, L.P. (Delaware)
TEPPCO NGL Pipelines, LLC (Delaware)
Chaparral Pipeline Company, L.P. (Delaware)
Quanah Pipeline Company, L.P. (Delaware)
Panola Pipeline Company, L.P. (Delaware)
Dean Pipeline Company, L.P. (Delaware)
Wilcox Pipeline Company, L.P. (Delaware)
Val Verde Gas Gathering Company, L.P. (Delaware)
Jonah Gas Gathering Company (Wyoming general partnership)
TCTM, L.P. (Delaware)
TEPPCO Crude GP, LLC (Delaware)
TEPPCO Crude Pipeline, L.P. (Delaware)
TEPPCO Seaway, L.P. (Delaware)
TEPPCO Crude Oil, L.P. (Delaware)
Lubrication Services, L.P. (Delaware)