***E.O. 12866 Review

– Draft

– Do not quote, cite or release***

1 of 18 EO12866_Forest Roads and NPDES Permits_NPRM _20120717 6560

- 50

- P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR 122.26 [EPA
- HQ
- OW
- 2012
- 0195; FRL
- XXXX
- X 9722
- 5 ] RIN: 2040

- AF42 Notice of Proposed Revisions to Stormwater Regulations to Clarify that an NPDES Permit is not Required for Stormwater Discharges from Logging Roads

. AGENCY : Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION : Notice of Proposed Rulemaking SUMMARY: The EPA is proposing revisions to its Phase I stormwater regulations to clarify that stormwater discharges from logging roads do not constitute stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity and that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ( NPDES ) permit is not required for these stormwater discharges. DATES: Comments must be received on or before [ INSERT DATE 30 DAYS AFTER
PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER ]. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 2012

- 0195, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov . Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
M ail: Water Docket, Environmental Protection Agency, Mailcode: 2822T , 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington DC 20460, Attention Docket ID No. EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 2012

- 0195. Formatted: Font: Bold Formatted: Line spacing: Double***E.O. 12866 Review

– Draft

– Do not quote, cite or release***

2 of 18 Hand Delivery / Courier: EPA Docket Center, (EPA/DC) EPA West, Room 3334 , 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC, 20460. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket’s normal hours of operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information.

Instructions: Direct your comments to Do cket ID No. EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 20 12

- 0195

. The EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at http://www.regulations.gov , including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or other wise protected through http://www.regulations.gov or e - mail. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site is an “anonymous access” system, which means the EPA will not know your i dentity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e

- mail comment directly to the EPA without going through http://www.regulations.gov , your e - mail address will be autom atically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, the EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of yo ur comment and with any disk or CD

- ROM you submit. If the EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, the EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of specia l characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional information about the EPA's public docket, visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm

.***E.O. 12866 Review

– Draft

– Do not quote, cite or release***

3 of 18 Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some information may not be publicly available, i.e., C BI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statue. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically in http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Water Docket, EPA Docket Center, EPA/DC, EPA West, Room B102, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday throug h Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566

- 1744, and the telephone number for the Water Docket is (202) 566

- 2426. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information on this notice, you may contact Jeremy Bauer, EPA Headquarters, Office of Water, Office of Wastewater Management via email at bauer.jeremy@epa.gov or tel ephone at 202

- 564

- 2775. SUPPLMENTARY INFORMATION: I. General Information
A. Applicability This notice does not impose requirements on any entity. The action proposed is intended to clarify the status of stormwater discharges from logging roads. T hose with an interest in such discharges may be interested in this proposed action. If you have questions regarding the applicability of this notice , consult the person listed in the preceding FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. B. Copies of this Doc ument and other Information This document is available for download at http://www.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater/forestroads or under docket EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 2012

- 0195.***E.O. 12866 Review

– Draft

– Do not quote, cite or release***

4 of 18 II. Background
A. Purpose The EPA is issuing this notice to address the stormwater discharges identified under Northwest Environmental Defense Center v. Brown , 640 F.3d 1063 (9 th Cir. 2011 ) ( NEDC )

. This notice proposes adding language to existing stormwater regulations to clarify that, for the purposes of assessing whether stormwater discharges are “associated with industrial activity,” the only activities facilities under SIC code 2411 that are “industrial” are: rock crushing, gravel washing, log sorting, and log storage. The effect of this revision would be to clarify , contrary to the Ninth Circuit’s decision in NEDC, that an owner or operator of a logging road that has discharges of stormwater to waters of the United States does not generally have an obligation to seek coverage of from silviculture facilities other than the discharge under four specifically named silviculture facilities identified above do not require an NPDES permit. 1 B. Statutory Authority and Regulatory History The objective of the Clean Water Act is to restore and maintain the chemical, physical , and biological in tegrity of the nation’s waters. 33 U.S.C. § 1251(a). To that end, the Act provides that the discharge of any pollutant by any person shall be unlawful, except in compliance with other provisions of the statute. Generally, the Act provides for a permit program for the discharge addition to waters of the United States of a pollutant from a point source, defined as “any discernible, confined and discrete conveyance, including but not limited to any pipe, ditch, channel, tunnel, conduit, well, discrete fissure, container, rolling stock, concentrated animal

1 This rulemaking responds to the uncertainty created by the Ninth Circuit’s holding in NEDC that certain channeled discharges of stormwater from logging roads constitute point source discharges, bringing them within the Section 402 NPDES permitting framework. This proposed rule, by clarifying what constitutes a discharge “associated with industrial activity,” makes cl ear that such discharges do not require NPDES permits even if th ey are point source discharges. Nothing in this proposed rule should be construed as conceding that discharges of stormwater from logging roads constitute point source discharges , a question o n which the Supreme Court has granted review for the October 2012 term. Formatted: Font: 12 pt***E.O. 12866 Review

– Draft

– Do not quote, cite or release***

5 of 18 feeding operation, or vessel or other floating craft, from which pollutants are or may be discharged.” 33 U.S.C. 1362(14). In 1987 Congress amended the Clean Water Act with the addition of section 402(p) , which required NPDES permits fo r some certain categories of
stormwater point source discharges and allo wed EPA discretion to determine how pollution from other stormwater discharges would be addressed

. For the initial phase, s ection 402(p)(1) created a temporary moratorium on NPDES permits for stormwater discharges from point sources except for those listed in section 402(p)(2), which includes discharges already required to have for which a permit had already been issued ; discha rges from large municipal separate storm sewer systems; and “industrial discharges

. ” Congress did not define industrial discharges , allow ing the EPA to define the term. For subsequent phases, s ection 402(p)(5) directs the EPA to conduct studies, in consultation with the

s tates, for “identifying those stormwater discharges or classes of stormwater discharges for which permits are not required”; “determining to the maximum extent practicable, the nature and extent of pollutants i n such discharges ; ” ; and “establishing procedures and methods to control stormwater discharges to the extent necessary to mitigate impacts on water quality.” Section 402(p)(6) directs the Agency to issue regulations, in consultation with s tate and local of ficials , based on such studies. The section allows the EPA flexibility in issuing regulations to address designated stormwater discharges where appropriate and does not require the use of NPDES permits or any specific regulatory approach . Specifically, the section states that the regulations “shall establish priorities, establish requirements for state stormwater management programs, and establish expeditious deadlines” and may include “performance standards, guidelines, guidance, and management practices a nd treatment requirements, as appropriate.” 33 U.S.C. § 1342(p)(6). This flexibility is unique to stormwater discharges and is different than the treatment of***E.O. 12866 Review

– Draft

– Do not quote, cite or release***

6 of 18 stormwater discharges listed in section 402(p)(2)(B) of the Act, which requires a permit for a

s tormwater discharge “ associated with industrial activity. ” Prior to the 1987 Amendments, there were numerous questions regarding the appropriate means of regulating stormwater discharges within the NPDES program due to the serious water quality impacts of stormwater, the variable nature of stormwater, the large number of stormwater discharges , and the limited resources of per mitting agencies . The EPA undertook numerous regulatory actions, which resulted in extensive litigation, in a n attempt to address these unique discharges. EPA’s Silvicultural Rule (40 CFR 122.27) predates the 1987 amendments to the Clean Water Act that created section 402(p) for stormwater controls

. The Agency defined silvicultural point source as part of the Si lvicultural Rule to specify which silvicultural discharges were to be included in the NPDES program. The rule defines silvicultural point source to mean any “discernible, confined and discrete conveyance related to rock crushing, gravel washing, log
sortin g, or log storage facilities which are operated in connection with silvicultural activities and from which pollutants are discharged into waters of the United States” and further explain s that “the term does not include non

- point source silvicultural activ ities such as nursery operations, site preparation, reforestation and subsequent cultural treatment, thinning, prescribed burning, pest and fire control, harvesting operations, surface drainage, or road construction and maintenance from which there is natu ral runoff .” In 1990, the EPA promulgated the Phase I stormwater regulations ( 55 FR 47990 (November 16, 1990) ) following the 1987 amendments which that directed the Agency to develop regulations requiring permits for large municipal separate storm sewer systems and stormwater “discharges associated with industrial activity .” ,” the EPA promulgated the Phase I stormwater regulations

.***E.O. 12866 Review

– Draft

– Do not quote, cite or release***

7 of 18 (55 FR 47990, Novembe r 16, 1990)

. The EPA defined in the Phase I regulations “storm water discharge associated with industrial activity” which is not defined by the Act. In describing the scope of the term “associated with industrial activity , ” several members of Congress explained in the legislative history that the term applied if a discharge was “directly related to manufacturing, processing or raw materials storage areas at an industrial plant.” (Vol. 132 Cong. Rec. H10932, H10936 (daily ed. October 15, 19 86 ); Vol. 133 Cong. Rec. H176 (daily ed. January 8, 1987)). The Phase I rule clarified the regulatory definition of “associated with industrial activity” by adopting the language used in the legislative history and supplementing it with a description of various types of areas (e.g., material handling sites, sites used for the storage and maintenance of material handling equipment , etc.) that are directly related to an industrial process and to industrial facilities identified by EPA. the EPA. The supplemental language in the Phase I rule also includes the term “immediate access road.” The EPA considers “immediate access roads” to refer to roads which are exclusively or primarily dedicated for use by the industrial facility.
See 55 Fed. Reg. 47990, 48009 (Nov. 16, 1990). T hese “immediate access roads” do not include public access roads that are state, county, or federal roads such as highways or Bureau of Land Management roads which happen to be used by the facility. See id

. The Phase I regulation defines the term “storm water discharge associated with industrial activity” to include stormwater discharges from facilities identified in the rule by standard industrial classification or

“ SIC ” code at 40 CFR 122.2 6 (b)(14). The Age ncy specified in the Phase I rule that t he term does not include discharges from facilities or activities excluded from the NPDES program under other parts of the EPA’s regulations, including the Silvicultural Rule. As discussed above, the EPA had previous ly specified under the Silvicultural Rule which silvicultural discharges were to be included in the NPDES program (40 CFR 122.27). The EPA intended to regulate those same***E.O. 12866 Review

– Draft

– Do not quote, cite or release***

8 of 18 “silvicultural point source[s]” under the Phase I rule (i.e., rock crushing, gravel w ashing, log sorting, and log storage facilities) and to exclude from the Phase I regulation stormwater runoff from other silvicultural activities. For the “silvicultural point source [s]” (i.e., rock crushing, gravel washing, log sorting, and log storage fa cilities) regulated under the Phase I rule, the term “storm water discharge associated with industrial activity” includes “immediate access roads” (40 CFR 122.26(b)(14)(ii)). Unlike “immediate access roads” associated with industrial facilities, many loggi ng roads have multiple uses, including recreation and general transportation, and commonly extend over long distances (i.e.; may not provide “immediate access” to an industrial site). The intent of the EPA in this notice of proposed rulemaking is that the NPDES program requirements be implemented with regard to “immediate access roads” in the same way they were implemented prior to the decision by the Ninth Circuit.
In developing the second phase of stormwater regulations, the EPA submitted to Congress i n M arch 1995 a report that presented the nature of storm water discharges from municipal and industrial f

acilities that were not already regulated under the Phase I regulations (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water. 1995. Storm Water Discharge s Potentially Addressed by Phase II of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Storm Water Program: Report to Congress. Washington, D.C. EPA 833

– K

– 94

– 002). On December 8, 1999, the EPA promulgated the Phase II stormwater regulations to address storm water stormwater discharges from small municipal separate storm sewer systems and construction sites that disturb one to five acres. ( 64 FR 68722 ( , December 8, 1999). The EPA retains the authority to designate additional stormwater discharges for re gulation at a later date under either CWA section 402(p)(2)(E) or 402(p)(6)

.***E.O. 12866 Review

– Draft

– Do not quote, cite or release***

9 of 18 The Phase II regulations for stormwater controls were challenged in Environmental Defense
Center v. US EPA , 344 F.3d 832 (9th Cir. 2003) ( EDC v. EPA ) . In that case , petitioners contended that the EPA arbitrarily failed to regulate discharges from forest roads under the Phase II rule. The court held that the EPA failed to consider the petitioners’ comments and remanded the issue to the EPA “so that it may consider in an appropriate proceeding Petitioner’s contention that § 402(p)(6) requires the EPA to regulate forest roads. The EPA may then either accept Petitioners’ arguments in whole or in part, or reject them on the basis of valid reasons that are adequately set f

orth to permit judicial review.” Id. at 863. For purposes of the discussion in this notice, EPA uses the term “forest road” to mean a road located on forested land and “logging road” to mean a forest road that is used to support logging
activities

. That is, as used in this notice, logging roads are a subset of forest roads. However, t he Agency has not established regulator y definition s of “forest road , ” “logging road , ” or “forested land” and welcomes comment on whether and how EPA should define these ter ms. EPA is also interested to know how states , tribes , and other federal agencies currently define them. The EPA recognizes that some forest roads are built initially to support logging activities but later serve other purposes that may or may not continue to include support for logging activities

. EPA requests comment on how states , tribes , and other federal agencies distinguish between such forest roads

. More recently, i n Northwest Environmental Defense Center v. Brown , 640 F.3d 1063 (9th Cir. 2011) ( NEDC ) , a citizen suit was filed alleging violations of the Clean Water Act for discharging stormwater from ditches alongside two logging roads in state forests without a permit . The court held that because the stormwater runoff from the two roads in question is collected by and then discharged from a system of ditches , culverts and channels , there was a point source discharge of industrial stormwater for which an NPDES permit is required. As***E.O. 12866 Review

– Draft

– Do not quote, cite or release***

10 of 18 discussed above, the Clean Water Act defines point source as “any dis cernible, confined and discrete conveyance, including but not limited to any pipe, ditch, channel, tunnel, conduit, well, discrete fissure, container, rolling stock, concentrated animal feeding operation, or vessel or other floating craft, from which pollu tants are or may be discharged.” 33 U.S.C. 1362(14). As discussed above, the Agency specified in the Phase I rule that the term “storm water discharge associated with industrial activity” does not include discharges from facilities or activities
excluded f

rom the NPDES program under other parts of the EPA’s regulations, including the aforementioned Silvicultural Rule. The EPA recognizes that the current Phase I language could be clarified intends through this regulation to more clearly articulate EPA’s intent to limit Phase I applicability for to only those silvicultural activities to facilities that are “rock crushing, gravel washing, log sorting, and log storage facilities.” The Agency did not view discharges from logging roads themselves to be regulated as discharges from industrial facilities and proposes in this notice to clarify the Phase I regulatory language. In response to the partial remand under EDC v. EPA , the Agency continues to review available information on the water

- quality impacts of stormwater discharges from forest roads, which include logging roads as discussed above , as well as existing practices to control those discharges and anticipates proposing to designat e is considering a range of options to address such discharges, which could include designat ing a subset of stormwater discharges from forest roads for regulation under the A gency’s section 402(p) rulemaking authority

. The EPA believes that the broad range of flexible approaches under section 402(p)(6) may be well suited to address the complexity of forest road ownership, management, and use

. EPA is currently evaluating comments on its Notice of Intent to Revise Stormwater Regulations To Specify That an NPDES Permit is Not Required for Stormwater Discha rges From Logging Roads and To Seek Comment***E.O. 12866 Review

– Draft

– Do not quote, cite or release***

11 of 18 on Approaches for Addressing Water Quality Impacts From Forest Road Discharges (77 FR 30473, May 23, 2012), a s it considers possible next steps

. In the interim, the EPA notes that Congress has directed that permits are not required for stormwater discharges for logging roads. Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2012 ,

u ntil September 30, 2012, the Administrator may not require a n NPDES permit or directly or indirectly require any s tate to require a permit, for discharges of stormwater runoff from roads, the construction, use, or maintenance of which are associated with silvicultur al activities

. I II . Proposed Revisions and Rationale A. Propose d Revisions The EPA is proposing to revise 40 CFR 122.26(b)(14)(ii) to clarify that for the purposes of defining stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity, the only activities under SIC code 2411 that are “ industrial ” are rock crushing, gravel washing, log sortin g, and log storage. This revision does not remove any existing exemptions. Though the existing language in 40 CFR 122.26(b)(14)(ii) excepts SIC code 2434, wood kitchen cabinets, the wood kitchen cabinets category remains co vered in a separate subsection. See id

. at 122.26(b)(14)(xi) (listing “Facilities covered under Standard Industrial Classifications 20, 21, 22, 23, 2434 . . .” as engaging in industrial activity for purposes of the industrial stormwater regulations. ) B. Rational e The EPA did not intend logging roads themselves to be regulated as industrial facilities. However, in light of NEDC , the EPA recognizes the utility of clarifying the existing language in
40 CFR 122.26 (b)(14) and proposes the addition of language to that section 40 CFR 122.26(b)( 14) to clarify the Agency’s intent.***E.O. 12866 Review

– Draft

– Do not quote, cite or release***

12 of 18 The EPA believes that stormwater discharges from forest roads, including logging roads, should be evaluated under section 402(p)(6) of the Clean Water Act because the section allows for a broad range of flexible approaches that may be better suited to address the complexity of forest road ownership, mana gement, and use. C. Request for Comment The EPA requests comment on whether the proposed language sufficiently clarifies that discharges of stormwater from logging roads do not require a n NPDES permit. The EPA does not think that changes to 40 CFR 122.27 are necessary to accomplish the goal of clarifying the scope of stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity, but welcomes comments on this point and reserves the option of making changes to that section as appropriate to clearly articulate th e Agency’s intent. Although the EPA has conducted a preliminary review of the comments submitted in response to the “Notice of Intent to Revise Stormwater Regulations To Specify That an NPDES Permit is Not Required for Stormwater Discharges From Logging Roads and To Seek Com ment on Approaches for Addressing Water Quality Impacts From Forest Road Discharges” ( 77 F R

. 30473 ( , May 23, 2012), the Agency does not plan to respond to these comments when taking final action on the rule proposed in today’s notice. If you submitted com ments in response to the earlier Federal Register Notice that you believe to be relevant to the rule proposed today, please resubmit your comments in accordance with the process outlined above.
I V. Economic Impact The proposed action clarifies existing reg ulations and has no economic, public health, or environmental impacts.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Review***E.O. 12866 Review

– Draft

– Do not quote, cite or release***

13 of 18 A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this action is a " “ significant regulatory action.” Accordingly, EPA submitted this action to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review under Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2 011) and any changes made in response to OMB recommendations have been documented in the docket for this action. B. Paperwork Reduction Act The Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. ) requires the EPA to estimate the burden on regulated entities to comply with information collection requirements of the EPA ’s regulations

. This proposed action would clarify existing regulations and would have no impact on existing information collection requirements. C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) generally requires an agency to prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to notice and comment rulemaking requirements under the Administrative Procedure Act or any other statute unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small entities include small businesses, small organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions. For purposes of assessing the impacts of today's today ’ s rule on small entities, small entity is defined as: (1) a small business “as defined by the Small Business Administration’s (SBA) regulations at 13 CFR 121.201;” (2) a small governmental jurisdiction that is a government of a city, county, town, school d istrict or special district with a population of less than 50,000; and (3) a small***E.O. 12866 Review

– Draft

– Do not quote, cite or release***

14 of 18 organization that is any not

- for

- profit enterprise which is independently owned and operated and is not dominant in its field. After considering the economic impacts of to day’s proposed rule on small entities, I certify that this action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This proposed rule will not impose any requirements on small entities. Rather, the proposed rule will clarify that stormwater discharges from logging roads do not constitute stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity and that an NPDES permit is not required for these stormwater discharges. We continue to be interested in the potential impac ts of the proposed rule on small entities and welcome comments on issues related to such impacts. D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) This action contains no Federal mandates under the provisions of Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1 995 (UMRA), 2 U.S.C. 1531

- 1538 for s tate, local, or tribal governments or the private sector

. Th is action imposes no enforceable duty on any s tate, local or tribal governments or the private sector

. E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism This proposed action would not have Federalism implications. T his proposed action would clarify existing regulations and would have no economic impact. Thus, i t would not have substantial direct effects on the s tates, on the relationship between the national government and the s tates, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government as specified in Executive Order 13132. F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordin ation with Indian Tribal Governments***E.O. 12866 Review

– Draft

– Do not quote, cite or release***

15 of 18 This proposed action would not have tribal implications, as specified in Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this proposed action. G. Executive Order 130

45: Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks The proposed action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) because it is not economically significant as defined in Executive Order 12866. Moreover, this proposed action would clarify existing regulations and would have no economic, public health, or environmental impacts. H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use The proposed action is not a “significant energy action” as defined in Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001), because it is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. Add itionally, the proposed change does not involve the installation of treatment or other components that use a measurable amount of energy. I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104

- 113, 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note) directs the EPA to use voluntary consensus standards in its regulatory activities unless to do so would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical standards (e.g., materials
sp ecifications, test methods, sampling procedures, and business practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies. NTTAA directs the EPA to provide Congress, through OMB, explanations when the EPA decides not to use available a nd applicable voluntary consensus standards.***E.O. 12866 Review

– Draft

– Do not quote, cite or release***

16 of 18 The proposed action would clarify existing regulations and would make no change to existing standards. J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low

- Income Populations Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994) establishes federal executive policy on environmental justice. Its main provision directs federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law, to make environmen tal justice part of their mission. Agencies must do this by identifying and addressing as appropriate any disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs, policies, and activities on minority populations and low

- income populations in the United States. The EPA has determined that this action will not have disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority or low

- income populations because it does not affect the level of protection provided to human health or the environment. The proposed action would clarify exi sting regulations and would have no economic, public health, or environmental impacts.
K . Plain Language Executive Order 12866 requires each agency to write its rules in plain language. Readable regulations help the public find requirements quickly and understand them easily. Readable regulations may also increase compliance, strengthen enforcement, and decre ase mistakes, frustration, phone calls, appeals, and distrust of government. The EPA has made every effort to write this preamble to the proposed rule in as clear, concise, and unambiguous a manner as possible. The EPA requests comments on how to improve r ule language to enhance readability and make it easier to understand.***E.O. 12866 Review

– Draft

– Do not quote, cite or release***

17 of 18 Title: Proposed Revisions to Stormwater Regulations to Clarify that an NPDES Permit is not Required for Stormwater Discharges from Logging Roads Rule p. XXXX of XXXX List of Subjects 40 CFR Part 122 Environmental protection,

.... w ater pollution control

Dated:

Lisa P. Jackson Administrator

For the reasons set out in the preamble, 40 CFR part 1 22 is amended as follows:

PART 122

– EPA ADMINISTERED PERMIT PROGRAMS: THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM

1. The authority citation for part 1 22 continues to read as follows: Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq. Subpart B

-- [Amended]

2. Section 122.26 is amended by revising paragraph ( b ) (14)(ii) to read as follows: Formatted: Indent: First line: 0.25", Pattern: Clear (White)

Formatted: Indent: First line: 0"***E.O. 12866 Review

– Draft

– Do not quote, cite or release***

18 of 18 § 122.26 Storm water discharges (applicable to State NPDES programs, see § 123.25).

* * * * * (b) * * *
(14) * * *
(ii) Facilities classified within Standard Industrial Classification 24 , Industry Group 241 that are engaged in rock crushing, gravel washing, log sorting, or log storage activities conducted facilities operated in connection with silvicultural activities , defined in 40 CFR 122.27(b)(2)

- (3) and Industry Groups 242 through 249 ; 26 (except 265 and 267), 28 (except 283), 29, 311, 32 (except 323), 33, 3441, 373 ; (not included are all other types of si l vicu l ture facilities) ;

* * * * *