alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeDiplomatic Security Service Memorial...Richard  Bruce

# 				 Richard  Bruce			

				Third-Party Contractor			

Deceased				June 1, 2004			

**DS Public Affairs has been unable to locate the source of this image to seek permission for its use. Please contact DS Public Affairs (dspublicaffairs@state.gov) if you have additional information./strong>**Back to DSS Memorial

Tags

Diplomatic Security Service MemorialIraq

Back to Top
From: "Asselmeier, Buzz" <Buzz.Asselmeier@Illinois.gov>

To: Douglas Aburano/R5/USEPA/US@EPA, 

Cc: Andy Chang/R5/USEPA/US@EPA, "Ross, Jim" <Jim.Ross@Illinois.gov>

Date: 06/27/2012 11:16 AM

Subject: Clarification on 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS iSIP for Illinois

Doug,

We have reviewed our ambient monitoring data for PM2.5 and we have confirmed that observed

24‐hour PM2.5 concentrations have always been below 140 ug/m3 in Illinois.  Consistent with EPA’s

guidance, “Guidance on SIP Elements Required Under Sections 110(a)(1) and (2) for the 2005 24‐Hour

Fine Particle (PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)” September 25, 2009, areas that

have not observed PM2.5 concentrations above EPA’s intended significant harm level may opt to

address emergency episode requirements by attesting that concentrations had always been below 140

ug/m3.  As a result, Illinois satisfies requirements for emergency episode planning even without

contingency plan requirements specifically tailored to PM2.5.

--------------------------------------------

David "Buzz" Asselmeier

Acting Manager, Air Quality Planning Section

Bureau of Air

Illinois EPA

Phone: 217-782-0285

buzz.asselmeier@illinois.gov

--------------------------------------------
§ 50.7 Procedure for requesting determinations of controlling influence. ( a ) An insurer or insurers not having control over another insurer under § 50.4(c)(2)(i) or (ii) may make a written submission to Treasury to rebut a presumption of controlling influence under § 50.4(c)(4)(i) through (iv) or otherwise to request a determination of controlling influence. Such submissions shall be made to the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Office, Department of the Treasury, Room 1410, 1500 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20220. The submission should be entitled, “Controlling Influence Submission,” and should provide the full name and address of the submitting insurer(s) and the name, title, address and telephone number of the designated contact person(s) for such insurer(s).
( b ) Treasury will review submissions and determine whether Treasury needs additional written or orally presented information. In its discretion, Treasury may schedule a date, time, and place for an oral presentation by the insurer(s).
( c ) An insurer or insurers must provide all relevant facts and circumstances concerning the relationship(s) between or among the affected insurers and the control factors in § 50.4(c)(4)(i) through (iv); and must explain in detail any basis for why the insurer believes that no controlling influence exists (if a presumption is being rebutted) in light of the particular facts and circumstances, as well as the Act's language, structure and purpose. Any confidential business or trade secret information submitted to Treasury should be clearly marked. Treasury will handle any subsequent request for information designated by an insurer as confidential business or trade secret information in accordance with Treasury's Freedom of Information Act regulations at 31 CFR part 1.
( d ) Treasury will review and consider the insurer submission and other relevant facts and circumstances. Unless otherwise extended by Treasury, within 60 days after receipt of a complete submission, including any additional information requested by Treasury, and including any oral presentation, Treasury will issue a final determination of whether one insurer has a controlling influence over another insurer for purposes of the Program. The determination shall set forth Treasury's basis for its determination.
(Approved by the Office of Management & Budget under control number 1505-0190)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6828
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus J. W. DUNLAP, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-85-3, CR-85-7, CR-85-8, CR-85-9, CR-85-10) Submitted: September 25, 1997 Decided: November 14, 1997 Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. J. W. Dunlap, Appellant Pro Se. Harry Thomas Church, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Dunlap , Nos. CR-85-3, CR-85-7, CR-85-8, CR85-9, CR-85-10 (W.D.N.C. May 21, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
HomeBiographies...Michelle  Bernier-Toth

# 				Michelle  Bernier-Toth			

															Special Advisor for Children's Issues						Bureau of Consular Affairs												

				January 1, 2023 -									Present							

Tags

Bureau of Consular AffairsState Department Official

Back to Top
#### § 50.8 Procedure for requesting general interpretations of statute.

Persons actually or potentially affected by the Act or regulations in this Part may request an interpretation of the Act or regulations by writing to the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Office, Room 1410, Department of the Treasury, 1500 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20220, giving a detailed explanation of the facts and circumstances and the reason why an interpretation is needed. A requester should segregate and mark any confidential business or trade secret information clearly. Treasury in its discretion will provide written responses to requests for interpretation. Treasury reserves the right to decline to provide a response in any case. Except in the case of any confidential business or trade secret information, Treasury will make written requests for interpretations and responses publicly available at the Treasury Department Library, on the Treasury Web site, or through other means as soon as practicable after the response has been provided. Treasury will handle any subsequent request for information that had been designated by a requester as confidential business or trade secret information in accordance with Treasury's Freedom of Information Act regulations at 31 CFR part 1.
20

40 60 80 100Concentration (ppb) Los Angeles South Coast Air Basin

Annual NAAQS (53 ppb) 

# US EPA REGION 9 AIR QUALITY TRENDS, 1970

- 2012

ANNUAL NITROGEN DIOXIDE (NO 2 

# ) DESIGN VALUE CONCENTRATIONS BY

DESIGNATED AREA

Source: US EPA's Air Quality Systems (AQS) database (July 11, 2012 and June 25, 2013; last updated July 15, 2013). The 1971 primary national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for annual NO 2 is 53 parts per billion (ppb). The annual primary standard NO 2 design value for a

site is the valid annual mean recorded value. For annual NO 2 design values, X

- axis labels represent the design value year. All exceptional event data (e.g., high winds and wildfires) that EPA has concurred on have been excluded from design value calculations . An adequate monitoring network is not yet in place to measure for the

2010 1

- hour NO 2 standard; therefore, a trends chart for the 1

- hour NO 2 standard is not available at this time.
§ 539.506 Authorizing Certain Transactions in Support of Nongovernmental Organizations' Activities. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, all transactions prohibited by this part that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the activities described in paragraph (b) of this section by a nongovernmental organization are authorized, provided that the nongovernmental organization is not a person whose property or interests in property are blocked pursuant to this part.
( b ) The activities referenced in paragraph (a) of this section are non-commercial activities designed to directly benefit the civilian population that fall into one of the following categories: ( 1 ) Activities to support humanitarian projects to meet basic human needs, including disaster, drought, or flood relief; food, nutrition, or medicine distribution; the provision of health services; assistance for vulnerable or displaced populations, including individuals with disabilities and the elderly; and environmental programs;
( 2 ) Activities to support democracy building, including activities to support rule of law, citizen participation, government accountability and transparency, human rights and fundamental freedoms, access to information, and civil society development projects;
( 3 ) Activities to support education, including combating illiteracy, increasing access to education, international exchanges, and assisting education reform projects;
( 4 ) Activities to support non-commercial development projects directly benefiting civilians, including those related to health, food security, and water and sanitation;
( 5 ) Activities to support environmental and natural resource protection, including the preservation and protection of threatened or endangered species, responsible and transparent management of natural resources, and the remediation of pollution or other environmental damage; and
( 6 ) Activities to support disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration (DDR) programs and peacebuilding, conflict prevention, and conflict resolution programs.
( c ) This section does not authorize funds transfers initiated or processed with knowledge or reason to know that the intended beneficiary of such transfers is a person blocked pursuant to this part, other than for the purpose of effecting the payment of taxes, fees, or import duties, or the purchase or receipt of permits, licenses, or public utility services.
( d ) Specific licenses may be issued on a case-by-case basis to authorize nongovernmental or other entities to engage in other activities designed to directly benefit the civilian population, including support for the removal of landmines and economic development projects directly benefiting the civilian population.
Note 1 to § 539.506 .
This section does not relieve any person authorized thereunder from complying with any other applicable laws or regulations.
[87 FR 78485, Dec. 21, 2022]
•;;FAHTMEMT OF 

^i'\NSPORWION 

OCKET OPERATIONS 

SERVED: MARCH 28, 2012 

m i MAR 2^1 P h 35 

US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

BADGER HELICOPTERS, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMSNO FAA-2012-0201 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2011AL910019) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other 

communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing 

Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List. 

Ronnie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrativj&^Taw 

Attachment - Service List 
FDMS No. FAA-2012-0201 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL i& ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Michael Jacob, President 

Badger Helicopters, Inc., Respondent 

24564 Hv/y 16/385 

Custer, SD 57730 

Agnes M. Rodriguez, Complainant's Counsel 

Senior Attorney, Office of the Chief Counsel 

Enforcement Division, AGC-300 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

TEL: 202-267-7268 

FAX: 202-267-5106 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor: 202-366-2139 

Staff Assistant/Paralegal 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Ser\'icc was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by e.\pedilec! courier, use the following address. Federal 

Aviation Adniiiiistratiou, 600 Itxdepeudencc Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

• • -2 -
#### § 1020.640 [Reserved]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal Nos. 09-52]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601-3740.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittals 09-52 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and sensitivity of technology.

Dated: August 12, 2009.

Patricia L. Toppings,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 42260)          ( print page 42261)          ( print page 42262)          ( print page 42263)          ( print page 42264)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[FR Doc. E9-20018 Filed 8-20-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
Exhibit 10.18


SUMMARY OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER
COMPENSATION


Effective as of January 1, 2007, the following are the
annual base salaries of the Chief Executive Officer and the four other most
highly compensated executive officers of Schweitzer-Mauduit International,
Inc.  No named executive officer has an employment contract with the
company.  The named executive officers participate in various compensation
plans and other arrangements as described in the company’s 2007 Proxy
Statement.


 


	
   

  	
   

  	
  Chairman, 

  CEO

  	
   

  	
  Chief Financial 

  Officer,

  Treasurer

  	
   

  	
  President–

  Americas

  	
   

  	
  Chief Operating

  Officer

  	
   

  	
  Vice President –

   Strategic

  Planning & 

  Implementation

  	
   

  
	
  2007 Base Salary

  	
   

  	
  US$600,000

  	
   

  	
  US$312,000

  	
   

  	
  US$335,000

  	
   

  	
  E300,000

  	
   

  	
  US$330,200
ex10-1.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 


 

 


 


To view Exhibit 10.2 refer to the attached:  ex10-1_pdf.pdf
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 309.9 Tenders; acceptance by the Secretary of the Treasury.

At the time fixed for closing, as specified in the public notice, all tenders received by the Federal Reserve Banks and Branches and by the Bureau of the Fiscal Service will be opened. The Secretary of the Treasury will determine the acceptable prices offered and will make public announcement thereof those submitting tenders will be advised of the acceptance or rejection thereof, and payment on accepted tenders must be made or completed on the date specified in the public notice.
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please

2 see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. 

3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated

4 errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does

5 not include the filing date.

6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

7 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

8 Plaintiff-Appellee,

9 v. NO. 29,792 

10 KENNETH KEY,

11 Defendant-Appellant.

12 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN JUAN COUNTY

13 Thomas J. Hynes, District Judge

14 Gary K. King, Attorney General

15 Santa Fe, NM

16 Jacqueline R. Medina, Assistant Attorney General

17 Albuquerque, NM

18 for Appellee

19 Hugh W. Dangler, Chief Public Defender

20 Nancy Hewitt, Appellate Defender

21 Santa Fe, NM

22 for Appellant

23 MEMORANDUM OPINION

24 WECHSLER, Judge.
2

1 In our notice of proposed summary disposition, this Court proposed to reverse

2 the district court’s denial of Defendant’s motion to suppress his breath alcohol test

3 results. The State has filed a notice of its intent not to file a memorandum opposing

4 our proposed summary disposition. Therefore, for the reasons stated in the notice of

5 proposed summary disposition, we reverse. 

6 IT IS SO ORDERED.

7 _______________________________

8 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

9 WE CONCUR:

10 ________________________________

11 CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge

12 ________________________________

13 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
# L_2020238EN.01008201.xml

| 23.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 238/82 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 238/82

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2020/1082

of 22 July 2020

amending for the 315th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida organisations

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 of 27 May 2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida organisations (1), and in particular Article 7(1)(a) and Article 7a(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 lists the persons, groups and entities covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources under that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 lists the persons, groups and entities covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources under that Regulation.

| (2) | On 16 July 2020, the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council decided to add an entry to the list of persons, groups and entities to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 16 July 2020, the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council decided to add an entry to the list of persons, groups and entities to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply.

| (3) | Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 should therefore be amended accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 should therefore be amended accordingly.

| (4) | In order to ensure that the measures provided for in this Regulation are effective it should enter into force immediately, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

In order to ensure that the measures provided for in this Regulation are effective it should enter into force immediately,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 July 2020.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Director-General

Directorate-General for Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union

---

(1)  
  OJ L 139, 29.5.2002, p. 9.

1

---

ANNEX

In Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 the following entry is added under the heading ‘Natural persons’:

‘Noor Wali Mehsud (good quality alias Abu Mansoor Asim). Title: Mufti. Date of birth: 26.6.1978. Place of birth: Gurguray, Pakistan. Nationality: Pakistan. Other information: Leader of Tehrik-e Taliban Pakistan (TTP). Date of designation referred to in Article 7d(2)(i): 16.7.2020.’

---
l)ISMISS; Opinion tiled 1)ecdnhl)er 21, 2012

In The (!uitrt 

## f 41pra1! 

## .FiftIi 1i6trirt 

## nf xw at Jat1a No. 05-1.2-00510-CV VINCE FUI)ZIE, INI)IVI1)UALLY, ANI) TN1V, LLC D/B/A TRIUNE, Appellants V. ANCELIA WILLIAMS, Appellee On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 10-05215 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before 

### CThiefJustice Wright and Justices Francis and Lang-Miers Opinion By ChiefJustice Wright By letter dated September 27. 2012. the Court questioned itsjurisdiction over the appeal. Specifically, it appears there is no finaljudgment. We requested appellants to file, within ten days, ajurisdictional briefexplaining how this Courthasjurisdiction overthe appeal. As oftoday’sdate, appellants have not filed ajurisdictional brief. Except in circumstances not applicable here, this Court hasjurisdiction only over appeals from final judgments. See 

### Lehrnann v. F/ar-Con Coip,, 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). A final judgment is one that disposes ofall pending parties and claims. Id. Appellants are appealing the trial court’s December 20. 201] order granting the motion for summaryjudgmentfiledby Angelia Williams. one ofseveral defendants. Although the trial court’sorder disinsscx the claims ‘dgainst Ms. \ViIIiams. appellmils clmms against the other detndants remuin pendine. lor this reason. thejudgment is not tinal and appealable. CC Ie/i,iiciiin, 39 S\V.3d at 195 Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal Par want ofjurisdiction. See TEx. R. A1p. P. 42.3(a).

C ARC)I ‘N \\ Rl&Ji I (11111 JUSII(1 12951 OF,P05

## nurt ni Appcahi liftli 

## )itrict nf rxu at 

## Da11ai JUDGMENT VINCF F(J[)/IF. INDIVlD\liY. ANt) I’IVIV. ILC D/13’A TRI(‘NE. Appellants No. 05-12-00510-CV ANGELIA WILLIAMS, Appellee Appeal 1mm the 298th Judicial District Court of Dallas County. Fexas. (Tr.Ct.No. 10— 05215). Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright, Justices Francis and I ang

-Miers, participating. Based on the Court’s opinion ofthis date, the appeal is L)ISMISSED. It is ORDERFI) that appellee, Angelia Williams. recover her costs ofthe appeal from appellants. Vincc Fudzie. Individually, and TMV. IIC (I/h/a Triune. Judgment entered December 21

. 201 2.

(.\ROlYN ‘v\ RI(il 11 (1 llI1 .11 

## s I I( F’