alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-11-00504-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO

PANEL B JUNE 8, 2012

ALFREDO PECINA, APPELLANT

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

FROM THE 64TH DISTRICT COURT OF HALE COUNTY; NO. B17667-0806; HONORABLE ROBER T W. KINKAID JR., JUDGE

Before QUINN, C.J., a nd CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Alfredo Pecina, ent ered a plea of guilty to the offense of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. 1 Pursuant to a plea bar gain, appellant was placed on deferred adjudication for a period of ten years. Subsequently, the State filed a motion to adjudicate appellant. The first motion to adj udicate was dismissed. Later, the State filed another motion to adjudicate appella nt guilty and, subs equently, amended the second motion to adjudicate. Appellant pl eaded “True,” without benef it of any plea

1 See T EX

. P ENAL C ODE A NN . § 22.02(a)(2) (West 2011).2 bargain, to nearly all of the allegations pr esented against him. After finding appellant guilty of aggravated assault, the trial court conducted a hearing on punishment. The trial court assessed appellant’s punishment at confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice for eleven years. This appeal followed appellant’s conviction. We affirm.

Appellant = s attorney has filed an Anders brief and a motion to withdraw. Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed. 2d 498 (1967). In support of his motion to withdraw, counsel certifies that he has diligently reviewed the record, and in his opinion, the record reflects no reve rsible error upon which an appeal can be predicated. Id . at 744-45. In compli ance with High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 813 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978), counsel has candidly discussed why, under the controlling authorities, there is no e rror in the trial court = s judgment. Additionally, counsel has certified that he has provided appellant a copy of the Anders brief and motion to withdraw and appropriately advised appe llant of his right to file a pro se response in this matter. Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991). The court has also advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response. Appellant did not file a response. By his Anders brief, counsel reviewed all grounds that could possibly support an appeal, but concludes the ap peal is frivolous. We have reviewed these grounds and made an independent review of the entire record to dete rmine whether there are any arguable grounds which might support an appeal. See Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988); Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005). We have f ound no such arguable grounds and agree with counsel that the appeal is frivolous.3 Accordingly, counsel = s motion to withdraw is hereby granted and the trial court = s judgment is affirmed. 2

Mackey K. Hancock Justice

Do not publish.

2 Counsel shall, within five days after th is opinion is handed down, send his client a copy of the opinion and judgment, along with not ification of appellant = s right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 48.4.
HomeDiplomatic Security Service Memorial...John Eric  Branchizio

# 				John Eric  Branchizio			

				Third-Party Contractor			

Deceased				October 15, 2003			

**U.S. Government image**Back to DSS Memorial

Tags

Diplomatic Security Service MemorialPalestinian Territories

Back to Top
IB

House Calendar No. 160

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2547

[Report No. 104–417]

To designate the United States courthouse located at 800 Market Street

in Knoxville, Tennessee, as the ‘‘Howard H. Baker, Jr. United States

Courthouse’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 26, 1995

Mr. DUNCAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

DECEMBER 18 (legislative day, DECEMBER 15), 1995

Additional sponsors Mr. QUILLEN, Mr. WAMP, Mr. GORDON, Mr. HILLEARY,

Mr. TANNER, Mr. BRYANT of Tennessee, Mr. CLEMENT, and Mr. FORD

DECEMBER 18 (legislative day, DECEMBER 15), 1995

Referred to the House Calendar and order to be printed

A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse located at 800

Market Street in Knoxville, Tennessee, as the ‘‘Howard

H. Baker, Jr. United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2547 RH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The United States courthouse located at 800 Market

3 Street in Knoxville, Tennessee, shall be known and des4 ignated as the ‘‘Howard H. Baker, Jr. United States

5 Courthouse’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

9 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

10 to be a reference to the ‘‘Howard H. Baker, Jr. United

11 States Courthouse’’.

House Calendar No. 160

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2547

[Report No. 104–417]

A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse located

D

house’’.the ‘‘Howard H. Baker, Jr. United States Courtat 800 Market Street in Knoxville, Tennessee, as

ECEMBER 18 (legislative day, DECEMBER 15), 1995

Referred to the House Calendar and order to be printed
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

###### Editorial Note on Part 357

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 357 appear at 70 FR 57431, Sept. 30, 2005.

#### § 357.41 Waiver of regulations.

The Secretary reserves the right, in the Secretary's discretion, to waive any provision(s) of these regulations in any case or class of cases for the convenience of the United States or in order to relieve any person(s) of unnecessary hardship, if such action is not inconsistent with law, does not adversely affect any substantial existing rights, and the Secretary is satisfied that such action will not subject the United States to any substantial expense or liability.

[61 FR 43630, Aug. 23, 1996]
HomeBiographies...Jonathan Pratt

# 				Jonathan Pratt			

															Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary						Bureau of African Affairs												

				June 28, 2023 -									Present							

Jonathan Pratt is the Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary in the Bureau of African Affairs. Prior to that he was U.S. Ambassador to Djibouti from 2021-2023. Earlier assignments include Executive Assistant to the Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs, Deputy Chief of Mission at the U.S. Embassy in Islamabad, Pakistan, Office Director for Pakistan, Political Counselor in Islamabad, Deputy Chief of Mission in Brazzaville, Congo, Political Counselor in Khartoum, Sudan, and Management Officer in Luanda, Angola. He has also served in Amman, Jordan, Kinshasa, DRC, and the Bureau of International Organizations. He is the recipient of a Presidential Rank Award, a Distinguished Honor Award, the Director General’s Award for Reporting, and the James Clement Dunn Award for Excellence. He has an M.A. from the University of California at San Diego, a B.A. from Wesleyan University, and is an alum of Teach for America (Los Angeles) and the Peace Corps (Guinea-Bissau).

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsState Department Official

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Appointment of David Satterfield as Special Envoy for Middle East Humanitarian Issues

# 									Appointment of David Satterfield as Special Envoy for Middle East Humanitarian Issues							

Press Statement

The Secretary of State

October 15, 2023

President Biden has appointed former Ambassador David Satterfield as the Special Envoy for Middle East Humanitarian Issues. Special Envoy Satterfield will lead U.S. diplomacy to urgently address the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, including work to facilitate the provision of life-saving assistance to the most vulnerable people and promote the safety of civilians, in coordination with the United Nations and U.S. partners. He will lead a whole-of-government campaign to mitigate the humanitarian fallout of Hamas’ terrorist attack against Israel, supporting critical efforts by the U.S. Agency for International Development and the Department of State’s Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration. His role builds on the long-standing U.S. commitment to supporting peace and stability in the region.

Special Envoy Satterfield’s decades of diplomatic experience and work amidst some of the world’s most challenging conflicts will be instrumental in our continued effort to address urgent humanitarian needs. His regional experience spans over forty years including assignments in Syria, Tunisia, Saudi Arabia, and two tours in Lebanon. He has served as Acting Assistant Secretary for Near Eastern Affairs, as Director of Arab and Arab-Israeli Affairs in the Department of State, and as Director for Near Eastern Affairs on the National Security Council Staff from 1993 to 1996, where he worked primarily on the Arab-Israeli peace process. Since leaving government, Special Envoy Satterfield has served as the director of Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.

I deeply appreciate Special Envoy Satterfield’s willingness to take on this role and look forward to working with him closely in this new capacity.

Tags

Bureau of CounterterrorismBureau of Near Eastern AffairsBureau of Population, Refugees, and MigrationHumanitarian AidIsraelIsrael-Hamas ConflictOffice of the SpokespersonPalestinian TerritoriesPartnershipsPeaceRefugeesThe Secretary of StateTerrorism

Back to Top
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### §§ 359.57-359.64 [Reserved]
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-20939 Conference Calendar

THOMAS C. SAWYER ET AL., Plaintiffs, THOMAS C. SAWYER JR.; HARRY L. JACKSON, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus MICHAEL COUNTZ ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CA-H-93-3913

- - - - - - - - - - October 23, 1996 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appellant Thomas C. Sawyer, #579557, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). He contends that the district courtabused its discretion in dismissing his retaliation and denialof-access-to-the courts claims. We have reviewed the record, theNo. 95-20939 - 2 - district court’s opinion, and the brief on appeal, and find no abuse of discretion. See Whittington v. Lynaugh , 842 F.2d 818, 819-21 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 488 U.S. 840 (1988); Lewis v. Casey , 116 S. Ct. 2174, 2179-80 (1996). The brief is not signed by Harry Jackson and raises no issues relative to him. Sawyer’s motion requesting the appointment of counsel on behalf of himself and Jackson is DENIED. Jackson’s “Motion To Amend Signature” is also DENIED. AFFIRMED.
#### § 539.305 General license.

The term *general license* means any license the terms of which are set forth in this part.
#### § 526.319 Wrongful detention.

The term *wrongful detention* means a detention that the Secretary of State has determined to be wrongful consistent with section 302(a) of the Robert Levinson Hostage Recovery and Hostage-taking Accountability Act (22 U.S.C. 1741 *et seq.*).
#### § 7.465-5 Examples.

The provisions of § 7.465-1 and § 7.465-2 may be illustrated by the following examples:

# Example (1).

J and K, as equal partners, form partnership JK on January 1, 1975. Partnership JK is engaged solely in an activity described in section 465(c)(1). On January 1, 1975, each partner contributes $10,000 in cash from personal assets to JK. On July 1, 1975, JK borrows $40,000 (of which J's share is $20,000) from a bank under a nonrecourse financing arrangement secured only by the new equipment (for use in the activity) purchased with the $40,000. On September 1, 1975, JK reduces the amount due on the loan to $36,000 (of which J's share is $18,000). On October 1, 1975, JK distributes $3,000 to each partner. For taxable year 1975, JK has no income or loss. Although J's basis in the activity is $25,000 ($10,000 + $18,000—$3,000) J's amount at risk on the effective date is $7,000 determined as follows:

| Initial amount at risk | $10,000 |
| --- | --- |
| Plus: Items which increased basis other than amounts described in sec. 465(b) (3) or (4) | 0 |
| Total | 10,000 |
| Less: Distribution | 3,000 |
| J's amount at risk on effective date | 7,000 |

# Example (2).

Assume the same facts as in Example (1) except that JK has a loss (as described in section 465(d) for 1975 of which J's share is $12,000. Although J's basis in the activity is $13,000 ($10,000 + $18,000—($3,000 + $12,000)) J's amount at risk on the effective date is $7,000 determined as follows:

| Initial amount at risk | $10,000 |
| --- | --- |
| Plus: Items which increased basis other than amounts described in sec. 465(b) (3) or (4) | 0 |
| Total | 10,000 |
| Less: Distribution | 3,000 |
| Portion of loss ($12,000) in excess of portion of basis not at risk ($18,000) | 0 |
| Total | 3,000 |
| J's amount at risk on effective date | 7,000 |

# Example (3).

Assume the same facts as in Example (1) except that JK has a loss (as described in section 465(d) for 1975, and J's share is $23,000. J's basis in the activity is $2,000 ($10,000 + $18,000—($3,000 + $23,000)). The amount at risk on the effective date is determined as follows:

| Initial amount at risk | $10,000 |
| --- | --- |
| Plus: Items which increased basis other than amounts described in sec. 465(b) (3) or (4) | 0 |
| Total | 10,000 |
| Less: Distribution | 3,000 |
| Portion of loss ($23,000) in excess of portion of basis not at risk ($18,000) | 5,000 |
| Total | 8,000 |
| J's amount at risk on the effective date | 2,000 |

[T.D. 7504, 42 FR 42198, Aug. 22, 1977]
Exhibit 32.2

                          CFO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Emclaire Financial Corp. (the
Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here (the Report), I, William C.
Marsh, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,  the  consolidated  financial  condition  and
               result of operations of the Corporation.



/s/  William C. Marsh
---------------------

William C. Marsh
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

August 10, 2007
#### § 539.504 Official business of the United States Government.

All transactions prohibited by this part that are for the conduct of the official business of the United States Government by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof are authorized.

[87 FR 78472, Dec. 21, 2022]
§ 34.401 Responsibility for administration—Comprehensive Plan Component. ( a ) After selecting Comprehensive Plan projects and programs to be funded, the Council must assign primary authority and responsibility for overseeing and implementing projects and programs to a Gulf Coast State or Federal agency represented on the Council, which are called *assignees* in these regulations. In assigning responsibility, the Council must enter into a grant agreement with the Gulf Coast State or an interagency agreement with the Federal agency. Any grant agreement must be consistent with applicable Federal laws and policies on grants. The Council must specify whether any part of an assignee's responsibility may be further assigned to another entity and under what terms.
( b ) When an assignee's grant or subaward to, or cooperative agreement with, a nongovernmental entity would equal or exceed ten percent of the total amount provided to the assignee for that activity, the Council must publish in the Federal Register and deliver to the following Congressional Committees at least 30 days prior to the assignee entering into an agreement the name of the recipient or subrecipient; a brief description of the activity, including its purpose; and the amount of the award. ( 1 ) House of Representatives committees: Committee on Science, Space, and Technology; Committee on Natural Resources; Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure; Committee on Appropriations.
( 2 ) Senate committees: Committee on Environment and Public Works; Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation; Committee on Energy and Natural Resources; Committee on Appropriations.
( c ) The Council must establish and implement a program to monitor compliance with its grant agreements and interagency agreements.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                         353,590
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  489,527
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (21,516)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      34,561,831
<DEPRECIATION>                            (14,576,902)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              35,962,322
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,002,268
<BONDS>                                     23,145,265
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,814,789
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                35,962,322
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,689,958
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,824,134
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (2,656)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,306,981
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,438,501)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,438,501)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,438,501)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (8.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Bahrain National Day

# 									Bahrain National Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

December 16, 2022

On behalf of the United States of America, I wish His Majesty King Hamad and the people of the Kingdom of Bahrain a very happy National Day.

Over the last year, the relationship between the United States and Bahrain has reached even greater heights, with our second Strategic Dialogue and the visit of the Bahraini Prime Minister and Crown Prince Sheikh Salman bin Hamad Al Khalifa to Washington, D.C. We will continue to work closely together as partners on regional security, combatting trafficking in persons, and economic and business relations.

I congratulate the Bahraini people on the occasion of their National Day.

Tags

BahrainBureau of Near Eastern AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
§ 515.550 Certain vessel transactions authorized. ( a ) Unless a vessel is otherwise engaging or has otherwise engaged in transactions that would prohibit entry pursuant to § 515.207, § 515.207 shall not apply to a vessel that is: ( 1 ) Engaging or has engaged in trade with Cuba authorized pursuant to this part; Note to paragraph ( a
)(1):
The authorization in this paragraph includes, for example, trade with Cuba authorized pursuant to § 515.533, § 515.559, or § 515.582, or by specific license.
( 2 ) Engaging or has engaged in trade with Cuba that is exempt from the prohibitions of this part (see § 515.206);
( 3 ) Engaging or has engaged in the exportation or reexportation to Cuba from a third country of agricultural commodities, medicine, or medical devices that, were they subject to the Export Administration Regulations (15 CFR parts 730 through 774) (EAR), would be designated as EAR99;
( 4 ) A foreign vessel that has entered a port or place in Cuba while carrying students, faculty, and staff that are authorized to travel to Cuba pursuant to § 515.565(a); or
( 5 ) Carrying or has carried persons between the United States and Cuba or within Cuba pursuant to the authorization in § 515.572(a)(2) or, in the case of a vessel used solely for personal travel (and not transporting passengers), pursuant to a license or other authorization issued by the Department of Commerce for the exportation or reexportation of the vessel to Cuba.
( b ) Unless a vessel is otherwise engaging or has otherwise engaged in transactions that would prohibit entry pursuant to § 515.207, § 515.207(a) shall not apply to a foreign vessel that has engaged in the exportation to Cuba from a third country only of items that, were they subject to the EAR, would be designated as EAR99 or would be controlled on the Commerce Control List only for anti-terrorism reasons.
[81 FR 71376, Oct. 17, 2016]