alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 223.16 List of certificate holding companies.

A list of certificate holding companies is published annually as of August 1 in Department Circular No. 570, Companies Holding Certificates of Authority as Acceptable Sureties on Federal Bonds and as Acceptable Reinsuring Companies, with information as to underwriting limitations, areas in which listed sureties are licensed to transact surety business, and other details. If Treasury shall take any exceptions to the financial statements submitted by a company or other information pertinent to the company's financial solvency, before issuing Department Circular 570, Treasury shall give a company due notice of such exceptions. Copies of the Circular are available at *https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/surety-bonds/list-certified-companies.html,* or from the Surety Bonds Program, upon request. Bonds underwritten by certified companies on the Department Circular No. 570 list may be presented to an agency bond-approving official for acceptance. Selection of a particular qualified company from among all companies holding certificates of authority is discretionary with the principal required to furnish the bond, but the acceptance of a bond by an agency bond-approving official is subject to § 223.17.

[79 FR 62001, Oct. 16, 2014, as amended at 89 FR 48837, June 10, 2024]
EXHIBIT 32.1

                          CEO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Emclaire  Financial  Corp.  (the
Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date here (the Report),  I, David
L. Cox, Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Corporation,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  result  of
               operations of the Corporation.



/S/  DAVID L. COX
-----------------------
David L. Cox
Chief Executive Officer


November 10, 2004


                                       23
HomeAssisted Schools...Vilnius, Lithuania: American International School of Vilnius: 2024 Special Needs Profile

# 									Vilnius, Lithuania: American International School of Vilnius: 2024 Special Needs Profile							

Special Needs Profile

Office of Overseas Schools

April 11, 2024

## 								School Contact Information							

        -  Tel:+370-5-212-10-31 | Overseas Schools Fact Sheet | Acting Regional Education Officer: Andrew Hoover 
        -  E-mail: Receptionist@aisv.lt   | Website: www.aisv.lt 
        -  Additional details on special needs support at post found on the **School Summary Information Portal**(must have OKTA login to access).  For more information, contact A/OPR/OS (**overseasschools@state.gov** / +1-202-261-8200), MED/CFP Child and Family Program Team (**MEDCFP@state.gov**/ +1-202-663-1815), or the school directly. 

 

**Download the Special Needs Profile** (Vilnius 2024 Special Needs Profile Lithuania) for this school to learn more about their capability to support students with exceptionalities.

The **American International School of Vilnius**(AISV) is an independent, coeducational day school which offers an educational program from pre-K through grade 12 for students of all nationalities. The school was established in 1993.

*This is intended to provide general information. Prospective users of the schools may wish to inquire further of A/OPR/OS or contact the school directly for more specific and up-to-the-minute information. Information and statistics are current as of December 2023 and provided by the school.*

NOTE: School situations can change quickly, particularly as schools face cutbacks to learning support programs due to the pandemic, unrest, and economic uncertainty. For the most current information, work with the REO and school. Information in this document was collected by the Department of State’s Office of Overseas Schools directly from the school in December 2023 and shows the availability of services rather than an assessment of the quality of the services. The profile is intended as a jumping off point for a conversation with the REO and school to understand the best fit for your child. Definitions may vary school to school.

Tags

LithuaniaOffice of Overseas Schools

Back to Top
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donnell Decol GARDNER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-6941.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 22, 2001.

Decided Feb. 27, 2001.

Donnell Decol Gardner, pro se. Brian Lee Whisler, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, NC, for appellee.

Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Donnell Decol Gardner appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a new trial pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 33. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *United States v. Gardner,*No. CR-95-3 (W.D.N.C. filed May 31, 2000; entered June 1, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 391.2 Equitable considerations. For reasons of equity and good conscience, late charges may be waived under the circumstances identified in this section. ( a ) Where, without fault or bad faith, the debtor could not submit payment within 30 days of the interest accrual date, the mandatory waiver provision in 4 CFR 102.13(g) may be extended. Such waiver will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Examples include, but are not limited to: ( 1 ) Postal service delays in forwarding the notice of indebtedness to a new address; and
( 2 ) Late receipt of the notice of indebtedness where the debtor was away from home on an extended vacation or hospitalized.
( b ) Where an installment plan is contemplated and the amount of the late charges in relation to the amount of reasonably affordable installment payments is so large that the debt may never be paid, late charges may be waived.
#### Robert GARY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. WEST COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 99-1587.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Feb. 14, 2001.

Before BRORBY, JOHN C. PORFILIO, and BALDOCK, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unani*642mously to grant the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral argument. *See*Fed.R.App.P. 34(f); 10th Cir.R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Plaintiffiappellant Robert Gary appeals from summary judgment granted in favor of defendant/appellee U.S. West Communications, Inc. on his claims brought pursuant to sections 1132 and 1140 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461, federal common law, and state law. Our jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

The relevant facts are set forth in the district court’s thorough and well-reasoned order of November 24, 1999. On appeal, Mr. Gary argues that the district court erred in holding that: (1) his claim for benefits should be dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies; (2) his evidence was insufficient to support his claim for retaliation; and (3) dismissal of his case should be with prejudice. “We review a district court’s grant of summary judgment *de novo,*applying the same legal standard used by the district court pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c).” *Deboard v. Sunshine Mining & Refining Co.,*208 F.3d 1228, 1237 (10th Cir.2000). After reviewing the parties’ briefs and conducting a *de novo*review of the record, this court concludes that the district court correctly decided issues one and two for substantially the same reasons as stated in the district court’s order. *See*Appellant’s App. Vol. IV, at 1040-50. As U.S. West Communications points out, Mr. Gary did not appeal from the district court’s determination that, notwithstanding Mr. Gary’s failure to administratively appeal from the denial of benefits, U.S. West Communications did not abuse its discretion in denying his disability claim. Thus, dismissal of the case with prejudice was also proper.

The judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado is AFFIRMED.

*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the *642case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir.R. 36.3.
§ 28.230 Transition plans. ( a ) *Submission of plans.* An institution to which § 28.225 applies and that is composed of more than one administratively separate unit may submit either a single transition plan applicable to all such units, or a separate transition plan applicable to each such unit.
( b ) *Content of plans.* In order to be approved by the Secretary of Education, a transition plan shall: ( 1 ) State the name, address, and Federal Interagency Committee on Education Code of the educational institution submitting such plan, the administratively separate units to which the plan is applicable, and the name, address, and telephone number of the person to whom questions concerning the plan may be addressed. The person who submits the plan shall be the chief administrator or president of the institution, or another individual legally authorized to bind the institution to all actions set forth in the plan.
( 2 ) State whether the educational institution or administratively separate unit admits students of both sexes as regular students and, if so, when it began to do so.
( 3 ) Identify and describe with respect to the educational institution or administratively separate unit any obstacles to admitting students without discrimination on the basis of sex.
( 4 ) Describe in detail the steps necessary to eliminate as soon as practicable each obstacle so identified and indicate the schedule for taking these steps and the individual directly responsible for their implementation.
( 5 ) Include estimates of the number of students, by sex, expected to apply for, be admitted to, and enter each class during the period covered by the plan.
( c ) *Nondiscrimination.* No policy or practice of a recipient to which § 28.225 applies shall result in treatment of applicants to or students of such recipient in violation of §§ 28.300 through 28.310 unless such treatment is necessitated by an obstacle identified in paragraph (b)(3) of this section and a schedule for eliminating that obstacle has been provided as required by paragraph (b)(4) of this section.
( d ) *Effects of past exclusion.* To overcome the effects of past exclusion of students on the basis of sex, each educational institution to which § 28.225 applies shall include in its transition plan, and shall implement, specific steps designed to encourage individuals of the previously excluded sex to apply for admission to such institution. Such steps shall include instituting recruitment programs that emphasize the institution's commitment to enrolling students of the sex previously excluded.
- Office Home
- About Us

HomeDirectorate of Defense Trade Controls...About Us – Directorate of Defense Trade Controls

# 									About Us – Directorate of Defense Trade Controls							

Bureau of Political-Military Affairs

### Mission

Ensuring commercial exports of defense articles and defense services advance U.S. national security and foreign policy objectives.

The Department of State is responsible for the export and temporary import of defense articles and services governed by 22 U.SC. 2778 of the Arms Export Control Act (AECA) and Executive Order 13637. The International Traffic in Arms Regulations (“ITAR,” 22 CFR 120-130) implements the AECA. The Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) in the Bureau of Political-Military Affairs at the U.S. Department of State implements the ITAR including the United States Munitions List (USML).

### Structure

DDTC is comprised of three offices:
        - Defense Trade Controls Policy (DTCP)
        - Defense Trade Controls Licensing (DTCL)
        - Defense Trade Controls Compliance (DTCC)

Please see our organization chart for more detailed information.

Tags

Bureau of Political-Military AffairsDefense ArticlesDefense Trade ControlsExport Controls

Back to Top
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2602

To require country of origin labeling of perishable agricultural commodities

imported into the United States and to impose criminal fines for violations of such labeling requirements.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 9, 1995

Mr. BONO (for himself, Mr. GALLEGLY, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. HUNTER, Mr.

MOORHEAD, and Mr. STOCKMAN) introduced the following bill; which was

referred to the Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To require country of origin labeling of perishable agricultural commodities imported into the United States and

to impose criminal fines for violations of such labeling

requirements.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Imported Food Label5 ing Act of 1995’’.
2

•HR 2602 IH

1 SEC. 2. INDICATION OF COUNTRY OF ORIGIN OF IMPORTED

2 PERISHABLE AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES.

3 (a) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section, the

4 terms ‘‘perishable agricultural commodity’’, ‘‘commission

5 merchant’’, ‘‘dealer’’, and ‘‘broker’’ have the meanings

6 given such terms in section 1(b) of the Perishable Agricul7 tural Commodities Act, 1930 (7 U.S.C. 499a(b)).

8 (b) COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABEL REQUIRED.—The

9 country of origin of a perishable agricultural commodity

10 imported into the United States shall be indicated by

11 means of a label, stamp, mark, placard, or other clear and

12 visible sign on the commodity or on the package, display,

13 holding unit, or bin containing the commodity at the final

14 point of sale to consumers.

15 (c) FINES FOR VIOLATION.—Any commission mer16 chant, dealer, or broker who knowingly fails to indicate

17 the country of origin of an imported perishable agricul18 tural commodity as required by subsection (b) shall be

19 subject to a criminal fine in an amount not to exceed

20 $5,000 per violation. The Secretary of Agriculture shall

21 notify the Attorney General of suspected violations of the

22 labeling requirements of subsection (b).

23 (d) DEPOSIT OF FINES.—Fines collected under sub24 section (c) shall be deposited in the Treasury of the United

25 States as miscellaneous receipts.
3

•HR 2602 IH

1 (e) APPLICATION OF SECTION.—This section shall

2 apply with respect to perishable agricultural commodities

3 imported into the United States after the end of the six4 month period beginning on the date of the enactment of

5 this section.

Æ
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 225.5 Pledge of definitive Government obligations. ( a ) *Type and assignment.* Definitive Government obligations may be in bearer or registered form, and shall be owned by the obligor. ( 1 ) *Bearer Government obligations.* The obligor shall pledge bearer Government obligations to the bond official with all unmatured interest coupons attached.
( 2 ) *Registered Government obligations; assignment.* The obligor shall pledge registered Government obligations in the obligor's name to the bond official by assignment in accordance with subpart F of part 306 of this title and other codified procedures for issuers that apply to assignment of the registered Government obligations, except that, when so authorized under such procedures, all assignments shall be made in blank.
( b ) *Delivery to bond official; receipt.* All deliveries of definitive Government obligations from the obligor to the bond official under this part shall be made at the risk and expense of the obligor. Upon receipt of definitive Government obligations, the bond official will issue the obligor a receipt.
( c ) *Risk of loss; safekeeping.* All definitive Government obligations held by the bond official will be held at the risk of the bond official. The bond official will keep safe all definitive Government obligations and may place them with a custodian.
( d ) *Delivery to custodian; receipt.* If the bond official is in receipt of definitive Government obligations, and then places those obligations with a custodian, the expense and risk of loss in delivery will rest with the bond official. Upon the placement of definitive Government obligations with a custodian, the custodian will issue the bond official a receipt. All definitive Government obligations held by the custodian will be held at the risk of the custodian.
( e ) *Conversion to book-entry.* ( 1 ) Treasury bonds, notes, certificates of indebtedness, or bills deposited with a Federal Reserve Bank under this part may be converted into book-entry Treasury obligations in accordance with part 306 of this title, and the pertinent provisions of that part shall apply to such Treasury obligations.
( 2 ) When converting definitive Government obligations to book-entry form, a Federal Reserve Bank will act pursuant to, and in accordance with, book-entry procedures for issuers that apply to the definitive Government obligations pledged to the bond official's agency, including those set forth in part 306 of this title.
www.gpo.gov

### §183. Marriage of white men to Indian women; evidence

Whenever the marriage of any white man with any Indian woman, a member of any such tribe of Indians, is required or offered to be proved in any judicial proceeding, evidence of the admission of such fact by the party against whom the proceeding is had, or evidence of general repute, or of cohabitation as married persons, or any other circumstantial or presumptive evidence from which the fact may be inferred, shall be competent.

(Aug. 9, 1888, ch. 818, §3, 25 Stat. 392.)

#### Section Referred to in Other Sections

This section is referred to in section 181 of this title.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 205.33 How are funds transfers processed? ( a ) A State must minimize the time between the drawdown of Federal funds from the Federal government and their disbursement for Federal program purposes. A Federal Program Agency must limit a funds transfer to a State to the minimum amounts needed by the State and must time the disbursement to be in accord with the actual, immediate cash requirements of the State in carrying out a Federal assistance program or project. The timing and amount of funds transfers must be as close as is administratively feasible to a State's actual cash outlay for direct program costs and the proportionate share of any allowable indirect costs. States should exercise sound cash management in funds transfers to subgrantees in accordance with OMB Circular A-102 (For availability, see 5 CFR 1310.3.).
( b ) Neither a State nor the Federal government will incur an interest liability under this part on the transfer of funds for a Federal assistance program subject to this subpart B.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

Editorial Note on Part 360
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 360 appear at 79 FR 8860, Feb. 14, 2014.

§ 360.20 General. ( a ) The Department of the Treasury will not recognize a judicial determination that gives effect to an attempted voluntary inter vivos transfer of a bond, or a judicial determination that impairs the rights of survivorship conferred by the regulations in this part upon a coowner or beneficiary. All provisions of this subpart are subject to these restrictions, except as provided in § 360.24.
( b ) The Department of the Treasury will recognize a claim against an owner of a savings bond and conflicting claims of ownership of, or interest in, a bond between coowners or between the registered owner and the beneficiary, if established by valid, judicial proceedings specifically listed in this subpart. Escheat proceedings will not be recognized under this subpart. Section 360.23 specifies evidence required to establish the validity of judicial proceedings. Treasury may require any other evidence to establish the validity of judicial proceedings, such as evidence that the proceeding provided due process, complied with this part, and complied with relevant state law.
( c ) The Department of the Treasury and the agencies that issue, reissue, or redeem savings bonds will not accept a notice of an adverse claim or notice of pending judicial proceedings, nor undertake to protect the interests of a litigant not in possession of a savings bond.
[63 FR 38049, July 14, 1998, as amended at 80 FR 80265, Dec. 24, 2015]
§ 50.110 Cap on annual liability. Pursuant to section 103 of the Act, if the aggregate insured losses exceed $100,000,000,000 during a calendar year: ( a ) The Secretary shall not make any payment for any portion of the amount of such losses that exceeds $100,000,000,000;
( b ) An insurer that has met its insurer deductible shall not be liable for the payment of any portion of the amount of such losses that exceeds $100,000,000,000; and
( c ) The Secretary shall determine the *pro rata* share of insured losses to be paid by each insurer that incurs insured losses under the Program.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 308.4 Applicable regulations.

Except as may otherwise be provided, and in so far as applicable, the general regulations of the Treasury Department, as contained in part 306 of this subchapter, as amended or revised, shall apply to full-paid interim certificates.
Exhibit 32.1

                          CEO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Emclaire Financial Corp. (the
Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here (the Report), I, David L.
Cox, Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the consolidated financial condition and result of
          operations of the Corporation.



/s/  David L. Cox
-----------------

David L. Cox
Chief Executive Officer


May 11, 2006