alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

Editorial Note on Part 357
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 357 appear at 70 FR 57431, Sept. 30, 2005.

§ 357.24 Availability and disclosure of Legacy Treasury Direct ® records. ( a ) *General.* All records with respect to a Legacy Treasury Direct account are held confidential. Consistent with the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a), information relating to those accounts will be released only to the owner except: ( 1 ) As provided in these regulations;
( 2 ) As provided in Treasury regulations contained in 31 CFR part 323; or
( 3 ) As otherwise provided by law.
( b ) *Inquiries by owners.* Information requested will be disclosed to an owner provided that: ( 1 ) Sufficient information is provided to identify the owner; and
( 2 ) Sufficient information is provided to identify the Legacy Treasury Direct account.
( c ) *Conditions for release.* A request for information will be honored only if, in the sole judgment of the Department or the Federal Reserve Bank to which the inquiry is made, the identity and right of the requester to the information have been established.
[51 FR 18265, May 16, 1986; 51 FR 18884, May 23, 1986]
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 309.8 Tenders; when cash deposit is required.

Tenders should be submitted on the printed forms and forwarded in the special envelopes which will be supplied on application to any Federal Reserve Bank, or Branch or to the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, Washington, DC 20226. If a special envelope is not available, the inscription “Tender for Treasury Bills” should be placed on the envelope used. The instructions set forth in the public notice announcing the offering should be observed with respect to the submission of tenders. Banking institutions generally may submit tenders for account of customers provided the names of the customers are set forth in such tenders. Others than banking institutions, will not be permitted to submit tenders except for their own account. Tenders from incorporated banks and trust companies, and from responsible and recognized dealers in investment securities will be received without deposit. Tenders from all others must be accompanied by a payment of such percent of the face amount of the Treasury bills applied for as the Secretary of the Treasury may from time to time prescribe: *Provided, however,* That such deposit will not be required if the tender is accompanied by an express guaranty of payment in full by an incorporated bank or trust company. Forfeiture of the prescribed payment may be declared by the Secretary of the Treasury, if payment is not completed, in the case of accepted tenders, on the prescribed date.
GULF OF MEXICO

UNITED STATES BATHYMETRIC MAP tno

LUND
NOS NG 16-4

L850 HMETEI TO soasonnn OFTHE

Own Ow Wart

sccirad anacaron pacieection
‘Sete 1.280.000
128 STAT. 1156 PUBLIC LAW 113–104—MAY 20, 2014 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3627: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 113–286 (Comm. on the Judiciary). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: 

Vol. 159 (2013): Dec. 9, considered and passed House. 

Vol. 160 (2014): May 7, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 113–104 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To require the Attorney General to report on State law penalties for certain child 

abusers, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Kilah Davenport Child Protection 

Act of 2013’’. 

SEC. 2. ATTORNEY GENERAL REPORT. 

Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this 

Act, and again 3 years thereafter, the Attorney General shall publish and submit to the Committee on the Judiciary of the House 

of Representatives and the Committee on the Judiciary of the 

United States Senate a report on the penalties for violations of 

laws prohibiting child abuse in each of the 50 States, the District 

of Columbia, and each territory of the United States, including 

whether the laws of that State, District, or territory provides for 

enhanced penalties when the victim has suffered serious bodily 

injury, or permanent or protracted loss or impairment of any mental 

or emotional function. 

SEC. 3. EXPANSION OF PREDICATE FOR INCREASED PENALTIES FOR 

CERTAIN DOMESTIC ASSAULTS. 

Section 117(a)(1) of title 18, United States Code, is amended 

by inserting ‘‘, or against a child of or in the care of the person 

committing the domestic assault’’ after ‘‘intimate partner’’. 

Approved May 20, 2014. 

Kilah Davenport 

Child Protection 

Act of 2013. 

18 USC 1 note. 

May 20, 2014 

[H.R. 3627] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
Moffett B. Roller

mroller@rollerbauer.com Law Offices



## R OLLER 

## & B

AUER, PLLC Washington Dulles International Airport 45005 Aviation Drive; Suite 200 Dulles, VA 20166 Phone: 202-331-3300 • Fax: 202-331-3322 Lee A. Bauer lbauer@rollerbauer.com August 29, 2011

Mr. George Wellington Chief, Foreign Carrier Licensing Division Office of International Aviation U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Re: Result of Poll Relating to Application of ABC Aerolineas, S.A. de C.V., d/b/a Interjet, for an Exemption Docket DOT-OST-2011-0159 Dear Mr. Wellington: We have polled the U.S. carriers on the Service List that was attached to the Application of ABC Aerolíneas, S.A. de C.V., d/b/a Interjet, for an Exemption, that was filed in the above docket on August 23, 2011. None of those carriers has any objection to DOT approval of the Application. Interjet therefore requests expedited approval of the Application so that Interjet can promptly initiate marketing and introduce service on the Mexico City - San Antonio, Mexico City - New York, and Mexico City - Miami routes. We are serving copies of this letter by email on all parties that were served with the Application. Respectfully submitted, ROLLER & BAUER, PLLC Attorneys for ABC Aerolineas, S.A. de C.V., d/b/a Interjet

By: ___________________________ Moffett B. Roller

cc: Service List
IIA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1358

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 31, 1995

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science,

and Transportation

AN ACT

To require the Secretary of Commerce to convey to the

Commonwealth of Massachusetts the National Marine

Fisheries Service laboratory located on Emerson Avenue

in Gloucester, Massachusetts.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 1358 RFS

1 SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF NATIONAL MARINE FISH2 ERIES SERVICE LABORATORY AT GLOUCES3 TER, MASSACHUSETTS.

4 (a) CONVEYANCE REQUIRED.—

5 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Commerce

6 shall convey to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts,

7 all right, title, and interest of the United States in

8 and to the property comprising the National Marine

9 Fisheries Service laboratory located on Emerson

10 Avenue in Gloucester, Massachusetts.

11 (2) TERMS.—A conveyance of property under

12 paragraph (1) shall be made—

13 (A) without payment of consideration; and

14 (B) subject to the terms and conditions

15 specified under subsections (b) and (c).

16 (b) CONDITIONS FOR TRANSFER.—

17 (1) IN GENERAL.—As a condition of any con18 veyance of property under this section, the Common19 wealth of Massachusetts shall assume full respon20 sibility for maintenance of the property for as long

21 as the Commonwealth retains the rights and title to

22 that property.

23 (2) CONTINUED USE OF PROPERTY BY NMFS.—

24 The Secretary may enter into a memorandum of un25 derstanding with the Commonwealth of Massachu26 setts under which the National Marine Fisheries
3

HR 1358 RFS

1 Service is authorized to occupy existing laboratory

2 space on the property conveyed under this section,

3 if—

4 (A) the term of the memorandum of un5 derstanding is for a period of not longer than

6 5 years beginning on the date of enactment of

7 this Act; and

8 (B) the square footage of the space to be

9 occupied by the National Marine Fisheries

10 Service does not conflict with the needs of, and

11 is agreeable to, the Commonwealth of Massa12 chusetts.

13 (c) REVERSIONARY INTEREST.—All right, title, and

14 interest in and to all property and interests conveyed

15 under this section shall revert to the United States on the

16 date on which the Commonwealth of Massachusetts uses

17 any of the property for any purpose other than the Com18 monwealth of Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries

19 resource management program.

20 (d) RESTRICTION.—Amounts provided by the South

21 Essex Sewage District may not be used by the Common22 wealth of Massachusetts to transfer existing activities to,
4

HR 1358 RFS

1 or conduct activities at, property conveyed under this sec2 tion.

Passed the House of Representatives October 30,

1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 306.115 Definition of terms.

For the purposes of this subpart, the definitions provided in 31 CFR 357.3 are applicable, with the following additions:

*Definitive Treasury security* means a Treasury bond, note, certificate of indebtedness, or bill issued under 31 U.S.C. chapter 31 in engraved or printed form.

*Eligible book-entry Treasury security* means a security maintained in TRADES that was originally issued prior to August 15, 1986, which by the terms of its offering circular is available in either definitive or book-entry form.

[61 FR 43637, Aug. 23, 1996]
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 340.6 Submission of bids. ( a ) *General.* Bids will be received only at the place specified and not later than the time designated in the public notice. Each bid must be submitted on the official form referred to in the public notice and should be enclosed and sealed in the special envelope provided by the Treasury Department. Forms and envelopes may be obtained from any Federal Reserve Bank or Branch or the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, Treasury Department, Washington, DC 20220. Bids shall be irrevocable.
( b ) *Bidding.* Bids, except noncompetitive bids when authorized, must be expressed as a percentage of the principal amount in not to exceed five decimals, e.g., 100.01038 percent. Provisions relating to the coupon rate of interest on the bonds, if not set forth in the public notice, will be made in a supplemental announcement. The public notice will indicate the timing of any such announcement. If the bidders are required to specify the coupon rate, each bidder shall specify a single coupon rate of interest, which shall be a multiple of 1 ⁄ 8 of 1 percent but not in excess of 41 ⁄ 4 percent. The Secretary of the Treasury may limit the premium above or the discount below par.
( c ) *Group bids.* A syndicate or other group submitting a bid must act through a representative who must be a member of the group. The representative must warrant to the Secretary of the Treasury that he has all necessary power and authority to act for each member and to bind the members jointly and severally. In addition to whatever other data may be required by the Secretary of the Treasury, in the case of a syndicate, the representative must file, within one hour after the time for opening of bids, at the place specified in the public notice for receipt of bids a final statement of the composition of the syndicate membership and the amount of each member's underwriting participation.
HomeBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsRemarks & Releases...APEC First Senior Officials’ Meeting Strengthens Multilateral Cooperation

# 									APEC First Senior Officials’ Meeting Strengthens Multilateral Cooperation							

Other Release

March 3, 2023

The United States was proud to host the APEC First Senior Officials’ Meeting (SOM1), from February 14 to 28, in Palm Springs, California. More than 1,500 Senior Officials and delegates from APEC’s  21 member economies gathered to discuss substantive and cross-cutting issues for the Asia-Pacific region in more than 100 technical meetings, working groups, and workshops. They also engaged bilaterally with counterparts and participated in field trips and excursions to gain an understanding of the breadth of work being done in the United States that aligns with the APEC priorities.
        - Under the priority of “Interconnected,” they discussed how APEC could take forward work on supply chain resilience, digital trade, and connectivity including infrastructure, and expand opportunities for SMEs.
        - Under “Innovative,” they explored ways to address climate change and environmental sustainability, food security, good regulatory practices, health, anti-corruption, digitalization, and fostering an enabling environment.
        - Finally, under the third priority of “Inclusive,” they looked at how APEC can align its work on inclusive growth for workers and groups with untapped economic potential including, women, SMEs, and historically underserved and underrepresented communities.

By fostering cooperation, delegates are taking a crucial step toward promoting economic prosperity, advancing innovation, and enabling inclusive and balanced growth, making sure that all members of society can fully participate in the economy around the Asia-Pacific region.

The private sector also played an important role in these meetings as U.S. officials participated in policy partnership discussions and met with a range of representatives from area businesses, indigenous-owned businesses, and the local government and community to collaborate on advancing an innovative and practical economic agenda that benefits workers, businesses, underserved communities, women, and families in the United States and across the region.

The United States looks forward to continuing these efforts during our host year under the theme “Creating a Resilient and Sustainable Future for All” as well as to hosting further APEC meeting clusters that will lay the groundwork for ministers’ meetings and provide a forum for officials to discuss the important ongoing work. The next meetings are to take place in Detroit, Michigan (May 2023); Seattle, Washington (August 2023); and San Francisco, California (November 2023).

Learn more about the U.S. APEC 2023 host year here.

For further information, please contact the U.S. APEC Team at DOSAPEC@state.gov.

 

Tags

Asia-Pacific Economic CooperationBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsMultilateral

Back to Top
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 255 Engrossed in House (EH)]

    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 255

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To designate the Federal Justice Building in Miami, Florida, as the 
           ``James Lawrence King Federal Justice Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal Justice Building located at 99 Northeast Fourth Street 
in Miami, Florida, shall be known and designated as the ``James 
Lawrence King Federal Justice Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``James Lawrence 
King Federal Justice Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 5, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 255

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To designate the Federal Justice Building in Miami, Florida, as the 
           ``James Lawrence King Federal Justice Building''.
```
FIL ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTHCI RCUI T FEB 1, 2012 J OHN L EY CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 1- 13 34 4 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock etNo. 4 :1 0- cr-0 00 71 -RH-WCS-3 UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll Pla in ti ff-Ap pe ll ee, ve rs us SAMM Y LAMY, a.k .a. Sin m

y Lam y ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll Defen da nt -Ap pe ll an t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt forth e North ernDis tri ctof F lo rid a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ (Feb ru ary 1, 2 01 2) Befo re HULL, MARCUS an d B LACK, Circ ui t J ud ge s. PER CURI AM: Gwend ol yn S pi ve y , app oi nt edco un se l fo r Samm y Lam y inth is di rect cri m in al ap pe al , has m ov edto withd raw fro m furth er re pr es en ta ti onof t heap pe ll an t an d h as fil eda br ie f pu rs ua ntto And er s v. C al if or ni a , 38 6 U.S. 7 38 , 87 S.Ct . 13 96 , 18 L.Ed.2d49 3 (1 96 7) . Our i nd ep en de ntrev ie w of t he en ti re reco rdrev eal s t ha t co un se l’s as se ss m en t o f th e rel at iv e m eri t o f th e ap pe al is co rrec t. Bec au se in de pe nd en t ex am in at io n o f th e en ti re re co rdrev eal s n o i ss ue s o f arg uabl e m eri t, co un se l’s m ot io n t o wi th dr aw is GRANTED , andLam y ’s co nv ic ti on an d s en te nc e are AFFIRMED.

2
#### Charles J. Schmitt *et al.,*Appellants, *against*Phillip Howell, Respondent.

(Decided December 5th, 1881.)

The plaintiffs having demanded from the defendant payment of the price of goods sold, the latter claimed a deduction of the amount of a wager lost by one of the plaintiffs to a third party, who had assigned his claim to the defendant. The plaintiffs allowed the deduction. *Held,*that they could not afterwards, on the ground of illegality of the wager, sustain an action for the amount as for a balance of the price of the goods remaining unpaid.

Appeal from a judgment of the district court in the City of New York for the Sixth Judicial District.

The action was brought to recover a balance claimed to be due for poultry sold by the plaintiffs to the defendant. The defense was payment and satisfaction.

The facts disclosed were that defendant owed plaintiffs $332.48 for poultry. Charles J. Schmitt, one- of the plaintiffs, called on defendant to collect the bill. The latter refused to pay unless Mr. Schmitt allowed him $54, being the amount of a wager Schmitt had lost to another party in the market, who had assigned the claim to defendant. Schmitt agreed, received from defendant a check for $278.48, and gave a receipt in full for $332.48.

The complaint was dismissed, and judgment entered for the defendant. From the judgment the plaintiffs appealed.

*291
      *J. J.*Brady, for appellants.

*Traitel, Platzek c& Otterbourg,*for respondent.

J. F. Daly, J.

[After stating the facts as above.]—Had the allowance of $54 been upon an unobjectionable claim, it is quite certain that we could not disturb the agreement on which plaintiff, Schmitt, gave the receipt in full. The question is whether in this form of action plaintiffs can undo the transaction. I think not. The effect of the agreement between the parties was the payment of the wager Schmitt had lost. At common law no action to recover back the money so paid would lie *(Yates*v. *Foot,*12 Johns. 1). The action to recover back money lost in gambling and paid over, is given by statute, and must be brought under the statute. This is not such an action.

The plaintiff who settled with defendant might have refused to allow the wager debt, and to take less than the face of his demand, and could have sued then, as well as now, for the amount of his bill. If his anxiety to get $278.48 was so great as to induce him to settle his gambling debt, he must resort to any remedy which the statutes may afford, to re-open the transaction in respect to the latter, which, to use the language of the court in the case first cited, has been executed and ought not to be disturbed.

The judgment should be affirmed.

Van Hoesen, J., concurred.

Judgment affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 254 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 254

  To amend title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 with respect to 
    establishing an unlawful employment practice based on disparate 
                               treatment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

   Mr. Hastings of Florida introduced the following bill; which was 
    referred to the Committee on Economic Educational Opportunities

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 with respect to 
    establishing an unlawful employment practice based on disparate 
                               treatment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Disparate Treatment Employment 
Discrimination Amendment of 1995''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

    Section 706 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e-5) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(l)(1) An unlawful employment practice based on disparate 
treatment is established if--
            ``(A) the complaining party, by a preponderance of the 
        evidence, proves a prima facie case that the respondent engaged 
        in conduct that constitutes unlawful disparate treatment based 
        on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin; and
            ``(B) either--
                    ``(i) the respondent fails to produce any evidence 
                to rebut such case; or
                    ``(ii)(I) the respondent clearly articulates, and 
                produces evidence of, one or more legitimate, 
                nondiscriminatory reasons for the conduct alleged to be 
                the unlawful disparate treatment; and
                    ``(II) the complaining party demonstrates that each 
                of such reasons is not true, but a pretext for 
                discrimination that is the unlawful disparate practice.
    ``(2) Paragraph (1) shall not be construed to specify the only 
method by which an unlawful employment practice based on disparate 
treatment may be established.''.
                                 <all>
```