Facility _Information facility _id utility

_code legal_owner_nam e

legl_operator_name

legal_address_type

legal_address

legal_city legal_state legal_zip 6254 9417 Interstate Power and Light (48%)MidAmerican Energy (52%) Interstate Power and Light

operator 200 First Street SE Cedar Rapids

IA 52401

Page 1Facility _Information plant_nam e

physical_address

phyical_city

physical_state

physical_zip

ma iling_address

ma iling_city

ma iling_state

ma iling_zip Ottumwa 20775 Power Plant Road Ottumwa IA 52548-8797 20775 Power Plant Road

Ottumwa IA 52548-8797

Page 2Facility _Information RFA_small_entity

ff_fired_coal

ff_fired_oil ff_fired_ngas ff_fired_petcoke

ff_fired_other

ff_permitted_coal

ff_permitted_oil

ff_permitted_ngas No TRUE TRUE FALSE FALSE FALSE TRUE TRUE TRUE

Page 3Facility _Information ff_permitted_petcoke

ff_permitted_other

deviation_reporting

continuous_emissions

cem_provided

facility _note FALSE TRUE Excess Emission Report, Quarterly Report, Semi-annual monitoring report, Annual Compliance certification Yes Facility : OttumwaThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally, IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. The

Page 4Facility _Information Facility : OttumwaThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally, IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. The

Page 5Facility _Information Facility: OttumwaThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally, IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. The

Page 6Facility _Information Facility : OttumwaThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally, IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. The

Page 7Facility _Information Facility: OttumwaThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally, IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. The

Page 8Facility _Information Facility: OttumwaThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally, IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. The

Page 9Facility _Information Facility : OttumwaThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally, IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. The

Page 10Facility _Information Facility : OttumwaThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally, IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. The

Page 11Facility _Information Facility : OttumwaThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally, IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. The

Page 12Facility _Information Facility : OttumwaThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally, IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. The

Page 13Facility _Information Facility : OttumwaThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally, IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. The

Page 14facility _contacts facility _id contact_id contact_title contact_name

contact_phone1

contact_phone2

contact_email

contact_primary 6254 1 Manager, Environmental Service Bradley G. Pincombe 6084584928 bradleypincombe@alliantenergy .com TRUE 6254 2 Environm ental Specialist Orvella Shipm an

6417913203 orvellashipm an@alliantenergy .com FALSE

Page 15facility _coal_utilized facility _id coal_type percentage_mass percentage_btu

synfuel_type

coal_note 6254 subbituminous 100 100

Page 16facility _oil_utilized facility _id oil_type percentage_volume percentage_btu

other_type 6254 No.2 Fuel Oil (distillate) 100 100

Page 17facility _other_materials facility _id other_material

permitted_burn

actually _burn other_quantity

other_quantity

_units other_note rcra_utilize rcra_explain 6254 Boiler cleaning waste

TRUE FALSE 300000 Permitted to burn up to 300,000 Gallons every 7 years No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive 6254 Ion exchange resin

TRUE FALSE 100 Permitted to burn 100 Gallons/Year No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive 6254 Oil/water separator sludge

TRUE FALSE 1000 Permitted to burn 1000 Gallons/Year No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive 6254 Oily

water TRUE FALSE 10000 Permitted to burn 10,000 Gallons/Year No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive 6254 Switchgrass TRUE FALSE No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive 6254 Turbine cleaning waste

TRUE FALSE 8000 Permitted to burn up to 8000 Gallons every 7 years No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive 6254 Used oil TRUE FALSE 6000 Permitted to burn 6000 Gallons/Year No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive 6254 Used oil adsorbents

TRUE FALSE 1000 Permitted to burn 1000 Gallons/Year No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive 6254 Water based parts washer

TRUE FALSE 10000 Permitted to burn 10,000 Gallons/Year No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive

Page 18facility _other_materials rcra_explain CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive

Page 19boiler_information

facility _id boiler_id boiler_type boiler_other bottom_design

design_fuel heat_input max_heat_input MW e_capacity 6254 1 Tangential firing Dry Bottom coal 6969.33 7990 765.1

Page 20boiler_information

MW e_net_capacity

design_gross_efficiency

operating_gross_efficiency

design_pressure

operating_pressure

design_temp

operating_temp

design_reheat_multiple

design_reheat_temp1 723.8 85.18 84.18 2520 2366.04 1.01 1.02 FALSE 1.03

Page 21boiler_information

design_reheat_temp2

operating_reheat_multiple

operating_reheat_temp1

operating_reheat_temp2

hours_operated

vg_capacity

_factor applicable_NSPS

retirement_year

retirement_year_CBI FALSE 1.04 7343 59.25 Subpart D FALSE

Page 22boiler_information

NOx_control

SO2_control

combustion_additives Yes Yes Yes

Page 23boiler_fuels

facility _id boiler_id fuel_type fuel_year percentage_massvol percentage_btu

other_type 6254 1 coal - subbituminous 2007 99.63 6254 1 coal - subbituminous 2008 99.82 6254 1 coal - subbituminous 2009 99.77 6254 1 oil - distillate 2007 0.37 6254 1 oil - distillate 2008 0.18 6254 1 oil - distillate 2009 0.23

Page 24boiler_control_NOx

facility _id boiler_id NOx_type NOx_other NOx_online 6254 1 Low NOx Burner 6/1/2007 6254 1 Other (specify) Neural Network

5/1/2008 6254 1 Overfire Air 6/1/2007

Page 25boiler_control_SO2

facility _id boiler_id SO2_type SO2_other SO2_online 6254 1 Low Sulfur Coal 5/1/1981

Page 26boiler_additives

facility _id boiler_id boiler_additive additive_other

additive_online 6254 1 Other (specify) Soda Ash for ESP Performance

8/1/1984

Page 27facility _units facility _id unit_id 6254 1

Page 28unit_boilers

facility _id unit_id boiler_id 6254 1 1

Page 29facility _controls facility _id control_id control_group control_type

control_other

legacy _control cntrol_online

control_offline

NOx_reagent 6254 ESP PM control Electrostatic precipitator, hot side, w/ flue gas conditioning FALSE 5/1/1981

Page 30facility _controls reagent_other

NOx_ammonia

SO2_sorbent

oher_sorbent

SO2_scrubber_additive

Page 31facility _sampling_ports facility _id sampling_port_id 6254 ESP-Inlet-1E 6254 ESP-Inlet-1W 6254 ESP-Outlet-1 6254 Stack-1

Page 32facility _stacks facility _id stack_id stack_height stack_diameter

sack_gas_velocity 6254 U1-Stack 600 25

Page 33configurations

facility _id configuration_id 6254 Unit 1

Page 34configuration_components

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

order component_type port_near 6254 Unit 1 1 1 Unit 6254 Unit 1 ESP 4 PM control 6254 Unit 1 ESP-Inlet-1E 3 Sam pling Port next 6254 Unit 1 ESP-Inlet-1W 2 Sam pling Port next 6254 Unit 1 ESP-Outlet-1 5 Sam pling Port pevious 6254 Unit 1 Stack-1 6 Sam pling Port next 6254 Unit 1 U1-Stack 7 Stack

Page 35configuration_pollutants1

facility _id configuration_id

pollutant_nam e

permit_type_1

em lim it_1 em lim it_units_1 avg_period_1

em lim it_2 em lim it_units_2 6254 Unit 1 PM (Filterable) State - State Operating Permit

0.1 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) 6254 Unit 1 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) State - State Operating Permit

1.2 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

3 hours 6254 Unit 1 Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) State - State Operating Permit

0.7 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

3 hours 6254 Unit 1 Carbon Monoxide (CO) State - State Operating Permit

0.163 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

30 days 8

Page 36configuration_pollutants1

avg_period_2

em lim it_details

test_method

em rate em rate_units guarantee_level

_explain

req_monitoring

eq_recordkeeping pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) Lim it 1 - Front half is a 3 run average. See note 1.05 for Limit 2. EPA Method 5 No Stack Test twice during each Title V issuance period ESP Agency

O & M Plan. To demonstrate the compliance with the PM limit of 2,798 tons per year, the owner or operator shall maintain a record of the total PM emissions on a 12-month rolling basis, rolled monthly using the most recent stack test results or other approved emission factors. The PM emissions shall include both filterable and condensable emissions. See Notes 1.06. & 1.06.a. No CEM 40 CFR Part 75.Continuous emission monitoring is required for Opacity, Sulfur Dioxide, Nitrogen Oxides, Carbon Dioxide, Carbon Monoxide and airflow. The monitoring shall be maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the facility’s Title V Operating Permit, 40 CFR Part 75, and 40 CFR Part 60 CEM 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall maintain a record of the SOx emissions (in tons) per month and calculate a twelve-month rolling total. See Notes 1.07. & 1.07.a. & 1.07.b. No CEM 40 CFR Part 75.Continuous emission monitoring is required for Opacity, Sulfur Dioxide, Nitrogen Oxides, Carbon Dioxide, Carbon Monoxide and airflow. The monitoring shall be maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the facility’s Title V Operating Permit, 40 CFR Part 75, and 40 CFR Part 60 CEM 40 CFR 75. The owner or operator shall maintain a record of the three hour rolling average of the NOx emissions in lbs/MMBtu. See Note 1.08 No Continuous emission monitoring is required for Opacity, Sulfur Dioxide, Nitrogen Oxides, Carbon Dioxide, Carbon Monoxide and airflow. The monitoring shall be maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the facility’s Title V Operating Permit, 40 CFR Part 75, and 40 CFR Part 60 CEM 40 CFR 60

Page 37configuration_pollutants1

req_reporting ESP Agency

O & M Plan The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity, SO2, NOx, CO2 and airflow to the IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity, SO2, NOx, CO2 and airflow to the IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity, SO2, NOx, CO, CO2 and airflow to the IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75.

Page 38configuration_pollutants1
The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity, SO2, NOx, CO2 and airflow to the IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity, SO2, NOx, CO2 and airflow to the IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity, SO2, NOx, CO, CO2 and airflow to the IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75.

Page 39control_technologies

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id project_titleproject_type vendor_name

vndor_contact

vendor_phone

Page 40control_technologies

vendor_address

vndor_city

vendor_state

vendor_zip actual_start_date projected_start_date

end_date sorbent chemical_additive

Page 41control_technologies

injection_point

HAP_em ission_reduction

HAP_em ission_rate

HAP_em ission_rate_units

HAP_achieved_reduction

HAP_achieved_rate

HAP_achieved_rate_units

feed_rate feed_rate_units

Page 42control_technologies feed_rate_units

Page 43control_coal_ranks

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id coal_type

Page 44control_pollutants1

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id pollutant_nam e

Page 45control_costs

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id boiler_retrofit boiler_new_install

total_capital_investm ent

total_operating_costs

base_year

Page 46control_costs

CBI

Page 47mi sc_controls

facility _id mi sc_control_id

control_description

Page 48mi sc_control_configurations

facility _id mi sc_control_id

configuration_id

Page 49fuel_shipments

facility _id shipment_id

shipment_date

am ount_received

am ount_units

fuel_type state_country other_country

county 6254 200901-Coal 1/1/2009 145821.8 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6254 200901-Oil 1/1/2009 348.4 barrels oil 6254 200902-Coal 2/1/2009 155745.5 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6254 200903-Coal 3/1/2009 170263.4 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6254 200903-Oil 3/1/2009 4834.6 barrels oil 6254 200904-Coal 4/1/2009 158191.2 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6254 200905-Coal 5/1/2009 167920.2 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6254 200905-Oil 5/1/2009 3142.5 barrels oil 6254 200906-Coal 6/1/2009 105964.5 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6254 200906-Oil 6/1/2009 3621.6 barrels oil 6254 200907-Coal 7/1/2009 173969.9 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6254 200908-Coal 8/1/2009 162059.2 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6254 200909-Coal 9/1/2009 139926.1 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6254 200910-Coal

10/1/2009 191903.1 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6254 200911-Coal

11/1/2009 181730.7 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6254 200911-Oil 11/1/2009 3387.2 barrels oil 6254 200912-Coal

12/1/2009 155888.2 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6254 200912-Oil 12/1/2009 2168.1 barrels oil

Page 50fuel_shipments

coal_seam shipment_method WY - Campbell Unit Train

Trucks WY - Campbell Unit Train WY - Campbell Unit Train

Trucks WY - Campbell Unit Train WY - Campbell Unit Train

Trucks WY - Campbell Unit Train

Trucks WY - Campbell Unit Train WY - Campbell Unit Train WY - Campbell Unit Train WY - Campbell Unit Train WY - Campbell Unit Train

Trucks WY - Campbell Unit Train

Trucks

Page 51fuel_shipment_configurations

facility _id shipment_id

configuration_id 6254 200901-Coal

Unit 1 6254 200901-Oil Unit 1 6254 200902-Coal

Unit 1 6254 200903-Coal

Unit 1 6254 200903-Oil Unit 1 6254 200904-Coal

Unit 1 6254 200905-Coal

Unit 1 6254 200905-Oil Unit 1 6254 200906-Coal

Unit 1 6254 200906-Oil Unit 1 6254 200907-Coal

Unit 1 6254 200908-Coal

Unit 1 6254 200909-Coal

Unit 1 6254 200910-Coal

Unit 1 6254 200911-Coal

Unit 1 6254 200911-Oil Unit 1 6254 200912-Coal

Unit 1 6254 200912-Oil Unit 1

Page 52fuel_shipment_samples

facility _id shipment_id

sample_id am ount_fuel am ount_fuel_units

total_sulfur ash_content heating_value

hating_units

Page 53fuel_shipment_samples

chlorine chlorine_units fluorine fluorine_units data_provided

data_other_specified

supplier_type

supplier_name

supplier_address

Page 54fuel_shipment_samples

supplier_city

supplier_state

supplier_zip

lab_nam e lab_address lab_city lab_state lab_zip analysis_copies

Page 55fuel_shipment_samples analysis_copies

Page 56fuel_sample_pollutants

facility _id shipment_id

sample_id fuel_pollutant pollutant_conc

pollutant_conc_units

pollutant_conc_ND

pollutant_conc_MDL

Page 57test_reports

facility _id report_id report_type other_type report_description report_begin_date

report_end_date

before_control

during_deviation 6254 OGS1-CO-20060801

compliance Carbon monoxide testing 8/1/2006 8/1/2006 No No 6254 OGS1-Hg-20061012

other Diagnostic Informational diagnostic Ontario Hydro mercury testing ######## ######## No No 6254 OGS1-Hg-20070726

other Informational diagnostic Informational diagnostic Ontario Hydro mercury testing at the unit 1 ESP outlet duct 7/25/2007 7/26/2007 No No 6254 OGS1-Metals-20060615

compliance Trace metals testing at the Stack of Unit 1 - this was in conjunction with the east and west ESP inlet metals testing on the same day 6/15/2006 6/15/2006 No No 6254 OGS1-Metals-Einlet-20060615

other Engineering study Trace Metals test at the Unit 1 East ESP inlet duct - this testing was in conjunction with the Stack and W est ESP inlet duct trace metals testing on the same day

6/15/2006 6/15/2006 Yes No 6254 OGS1-Metals-W inlet-20060615

other Engineering study Trace metals test at the Unit 1 ESP W est Inlet duct - this testing was in conjunction with the Unit 1 stack and East inlet duct trace metals on the same day

6/15/2006 6/15/2006 Yes No 6254 OGS1-PM-20060615

compliance Particulate testing 6/15/2006 6/15/2006 No No 6254 OGS1-PM-20080501

compliance Particulate testing at the Unit 1 ESP outlet duct 5/1/2008 5/1/2008 No No

Page 58test_reports

deviation_reports No No No No No No No No

Page 59test_report_configurations

facility _id report_id configuration_id 6254 OGS1-CO-20060801

Unit 1 6254 OGS1-Hg-20061012

Unit 1 6254 OGS1-Hg-20070726

Unit 1 6254 OGS1-Metals-20060615

Unit 1 6254 OGS1-Metals-Einlet-20060615

Unit 1 6254 OGS1-Metals-W inlet-20060615

Unit 1 6254 OGS1-PM-20060615

Unit 1 6254 OGS1-PM-20080501

Unit 1

Page 60test_report_fuels

facility _id report_id fuel_id 6254 OGS1-CO-20060801

Subbitum inous Coal 6254 OGS1-Hg-20061012

Subbitum inous coal 6254 OGS1-Hg-20070726

Subbitum inous coal 6254 OGS1-Metals-20060615

Subbitum inuous coal 6254 OGS1-Metals-Einlet-20060615

Subbitum inous coal 6254 OGS1-Metals-W nlet-20060615

Subbitum inous coal 6254 OGS1-PM-20060615

Subbitum inous Coal 6254 OGS1-PM-20080501

Subbitum inous coal

Page 61test_report_fuel_types

facility _id report_id fuel_id fuel_type percentage_massvol percentage_btu

other_type 6254 OGS1-CO-20060801

Subbitum inous Coal

coal - subbituminous

100 100 6254 OGS1-Hg-20061012

Subbitum inous coal

coal - subbituminous

100 100 6254 OGS1-Hg-20070726

Subbitum inous coal

coal - subbituminous

100 100 6254 OGS1-Metals-20060615

Subbitum inuous coal

coal - subbituminous

100 100 6254 OGS1-Metals-Einlet-20060615

Subbitum inous coal

coal - subbituminous

100 100 6254 OGS1-Metals-W nlet-20060615

Subbitum inous coal

coal - subbituminous

100 100 6254 OGS1-PM-20060615

Subbitum inous Coal

coal - subbituminous

100 100 6254 OGS1-PM-20080501

Subbitum inous coal

coal - subbituminous

100 100

Page 62cem_data

facility _id tim e_period

cem_period_description 6254 01/01/2009 - 12/31/2009

Start date of time period for which Hg CEMs data is available reflects post-installation and QA/QC of the Tekran continuous mercury emission monitor systems for Ottumwa Unit 1. See NOTES page for additional information.

Page 63cem_data Start date of time period for which Hg CEMs data is available reflects post-installation and QA/QC of the Tekran continuous mercury emission monitor systems for Ottumwa Unit 1. See NOTES page for additional information.

Page 64cem_data Start date of time period for which Hg CEMs data is available reflects post-installation and QA/QC of the Tekran continuous mercury emission monitor systems for Ottumwa Unit 1. See NOTES page for additional information.

Page 65cem_data_pollutants1

facility _id tim e_period

pollutant_nam e 6254 01/01/2009 - 12/31/2009

Total Mercury

(Hgt)

Page 66test_report_sampling

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id point_differ point_description befre_SO2_device

point_orientation

normal_bypass_percent

testing_bypass_percent 6254 OGS1-CO-20060801

ESP-Outlet-1

No No 6254 OGS1-Hg-20061012

ESP-Outlet-1

No No 6254 OGS1-Hg-20070726

ESP-Outlet-1

No No 6254 OGS1-Metals-20060615

U1-Stack No No 6254 OGS1-Metals-Einlet-20060615

ESP-Inlet-1E

No No 6254 OGS1-Metals-W inlet-20060615

ESP-Inlet-1W

No No 6254 OGS1-PM-20060615

Stack-1 No No 6254 OGS1-PM-20080501

ESP-Outlet-1

No No

Page 67test_report_sampling

fg_fraction
100% The ESP inlet is made up of two ducts: East and W est. Both equally share flue gas flow. The unit 1 ESP is made up of two ducts: East and W est. Both equally share flue gas flow.

Page 68sampling_runs

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id run_id start_datetime end_datetim e

unit_load net_generation fg_moisture_content 6254 OGS1-CO-20060801

ESP-Outlet-1

average 8/1/2006 8/1/2006 700 10.5 6254 OGS1-Hg-20061012

ESP-Outlet-1

average ######## ######## 619 11.8 6254 OGS1-Hg-20070726

ESP-Outlet-1

average 7/25/2007 7/26/2007 717 13.6 6254 OGS1-Metals-20060615

U1-Stack average 6/15/2006 6/15/2006 703 11.4 6254 OGS1-Metals-Einlet-20060615

ESP-Inlet-1E

average 6/15/2006 6/15/2006 703 12.4 6254 OGS1-Metals-W inlet-20060615

ESP-Inlet-1W

average 6/15/2006 6/15/2006 703 12.8 6254 OGS1-PM-20060615

Stack-1 average 6/15/2006 6/15/2006 703 10.4 6254 OGS1-PM-20080501

ESP-Outlet-1

average 5/1/2008 5/1/2008 696 12.1

Page 69sampling_runs

fg_flow_rate

fg_flow_rate_units

standard_temperature

standard_pressure

normal_temperature

normal_pressure

fg_oxygen_content

fg_CO2_content

fg_temperature 1784324 dscfm 68 1 5.7 14.6 1.11 1503796 dscfm 68 1 6.5 13.2 281 1670734 dscfm 68 1 7 13.1 1.15 1765170 dscfm 68 1 6.2 12.5 1.12 892823 dscfm 68 1 4.3 15.2 1.13 923704 dscfm 68 1 4.3 15.5 1.14 1842803 dscfm 68 1 6.2 12.5 1.09 1726164 dscfm 68 1 6.7 13.5 1.16

Page 70sampling_runs

fg_pressure

Hg_loi test_method run_comments

fuel_id fuel_unit_load fuel_flow_rate

fuel_ash fuel_heating_value 0.99 Method 10 0.97 ASTM D6784-02 - Ontario Hydgro Mercury testing Subbitum inous coal

619 790000 7.1 12003 0.97 ASTM D6784-02 Subbitum inous coal 717 904533 7.75 11900 0.97 Method 29 Subbitum inuous coal 703 894667 8.49 11672 0.96 Method 29 0.96 Method 29 0.97 201A/202 Subbitum inous Coal 703 894667 8.49 11672 0.94 CTM040/202 Subbitum inous coal 696 839267 7.53 11871

Page 71sampling_runs

fuel_sulfur 0.42 0.42 0.41 0.41 0.43

Page 72sampling_run_pollutants1

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id run_id pollutant_nam e conc conc_units conc_ND conc_MDL 6254 OGS1-PM-20060615

Stack-1 average PM (Filterable) 0.0097 FALSE 6254 OGS1-PM-20060615

Stack-1 average PM (Condensable) 0.0174 FALSE 6254 OGS1-PM-20060615

Stack-1 average PM10 (Filterable) 0.0064 FALSE 6254 OGS1-CO-20060801

ESP-Outlet-1

average Carbon Monoxide (CO) 1.8 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 6254 OGS1-Metals-20060615

U1-Stack average Arsenic (As) 2.04 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 6254 OGS1-Metals-20060615

U1-Stack average Beryllium (Be) 0.16 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 6254 OGS1-Metals-20060615

U1-Stack average Cadmium (Cd) 0.521 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 6254 OGS1-Metals-20060615

U1-Stack average Chromium (Cr) 3.822 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 6254 OGS1-Metals-20060615

U1-Stack average Lead (Pb) 4.823 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 6254 OGS1-Metals-20060615

U1-Stack average Manganese (Mn) 14.542 mi crogram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 6254 OGS1-Metals-20060615

U1-Stack average Total Mercury (Hgt) 7.807 mi crogram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 6254 OGS1-Metals-20060615

U1-Stack average Nickel (Ni) 2.781 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 6254 OGS1-Metals-20060615

U1-Stack average Selenium (Se) 39.389 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 6254 OGS1-Metals-Einlet-20060615

ESP-Inlet-1E

average Arsenic (As) 77.516 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 6254 OGS1-Metals-Einlet-20060615

ESP-Inlet-1E

average Beryllium (Be) 12.632 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 6254 OGS1-Metals-Einlet-20060615

ESP-Inlet-1E

average Cadmium (Cd) 6.222 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 6254 OGS1-Metals-Einlet-20060615

ESP-Inlet-1E

average Chromium (Cr) 295.795 mi crogram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 6254 OGS1-Metals-Einlet-20060615

ESP-Inlet-1E

average Lead (Pb) 150.814 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 6254 OGS1-Metals-Einlet-20060615

ESP-Inlet-1E

average Manganese (Mn) 574.485 mi crogram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 6254 OGS1-Metals-Einlet-20060615

ESP-Inlet-1E

average Total Mercury (Hgt) 9.262 mi crogram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 6254 OGS1-Metals-Einlet-20060615

ESP-Inlet-1E

average Nickel (Ni) 135.663 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 6254 OGS1-Metals-Einlet-20060615

ESP-Inlet-1E

average Selenium (Se) 102.369 mi crogram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 6254 OGS1-Metals-W inlet-20060615

ESP-Inlet-1W

average Arsenic (As) 75.948 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 6254 OGS1-Metals-W inlet-20060615

ESP-Inlet-1W

average Beryllium (Be) 11.353 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 6254 OGS1-Metals-W inlet-20060615

ESP-Inlet-1W

average Cadmium (Cd) 5.888 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 6254 OGS1-Metals-W inlet-20060615

ESP-Inlet-1W

average Chromium (Cr) 286.225 mi crogram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 6254 OGS1-Metals-W inlet-20060615

ESP-Inlet-1W

average Lead (Pb) 149.094 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 6254 OGS1-Metals-W inlet-20060615

ESP-Inlet-1W

average Manganese (Mn) 644.94 mi crogram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 6254 OGS1-Metals-W inlet-20060615

ESP-Inlet-1W

average Total Mercury (Hgt) 9.293 mi crogram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 6254 OGS1-Metals-W inlet-20060615

ESP-Inlet-1W

average Nickel (Ni) 153.233 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 6254 OGS1-Metals-W inlet-20060615

ESP-Inlet-1W

average Selenium (Se) 94.764 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 6254 OGS1-Hg-20061012

ESP-Outlet-1

average Total Mercury (Hgt) 8.152 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6254 OGS1-Hg-20061012

ESP-Outlet-1

average Elem ental Mercury (Hg0) 6.634 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6254 OGS1-Hg-20061012

ESP-Outlet-1

average Oxidized Mercury (Hg++) 1.506 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6254 OGS1-Hg-20061012

ESP-Outlet-1

average Particulate-bound Mercury (Hgp) 0.013 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6254 OGS1-Hg-20070726

ESP-Outlet-1

average Total Mercury (Hgt) 7.418 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6254 OGS1-Hg-20070726

ESP-Outlet-1

average Elem ental Mercury (Hg0) 7.092 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6254 OGS1-Hg-20070726

ESP-Outlet-1

average Oxidized Mercury (Hg++) 0.32 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6254 OGS1-Hg-20070726

ESP-Outlet-1

average Particulate-bound Mercury (Hgp) 0.007 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6254 OGS1-PM-20080501

ESP-Outlet-1

average PM (Filterable) 0.0139 FALSE 6254 OGS1-PM-20080501

ESP-Outlet-1

average PM (Condensable) 0.025 FALSE 6254 OGS1-PM-20080501

ESP-Outlet-1

average PM10 (Filterable) 0.0065 FALSE 6254 OGS1-PM-20080501

ESP-Outlet-1

average PM2.5 (Filterable) 0.0037 FALSE

Page 73sampling_run_pollutants1

em ission_rate

em ission_rate_units

em ission_rate_ND

em ission_rate_MDL

em ission_factor

em ission_factor_units

em ission_factor_ND

em ission_factor_MDL

run_pollutant_comment 152.72 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0193 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Typical concentration for PM is presented in grains/dry standard cubic feet. Concentration for this PM (Filterable) sampling run was 0.0097 grains/dscf.PM (Filterable) values includes PM10 (Filterable) values. 274.399 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0349 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Typical concentration for PM is presented in grains/dry standard cubic feet. Concentration for this PM (Condensable) sampling run was 0.0174 grains/dscf. 101.32 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0129 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Typical concentration for PM10 is presented in grains/dry standard cubic feet. Concentration for this PM10 (Filterable) sampling run was 0.0238 grains/dscf. 13.8 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0017 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.0135 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 1.79E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.00106 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 1.4E-07 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.00344 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 4.56E-07 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.0253 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 3.35E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.0319 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 4.22E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.0962 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 1.28E-05 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.0516 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 6.84E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.0184 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 2.43E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.26 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 3.45E-05 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.259 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 6.06E-05 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.0422 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 9.88E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.0208 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 4.86E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.987 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.000231 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.503 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.000118 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 1.92 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.000449 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.031 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 7.23E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.453 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.000106 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.342 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.00008 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.263 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 5.91E-05 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.0393 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 8.84E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.0204 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 4.58E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.99 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.000223 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.516 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.000116 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 2.23 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.000502 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.0321 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 7.24E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.53 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.000119 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.328 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 7.37E-05 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.04609 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 7.32E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.03762 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 5.95E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.00841 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 1.35E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.000066 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE 1.14E-08 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.0464 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 7.04E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.0444 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 6.73E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.002 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 3.03E-07 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 4.23E-05 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE 6.47E-09 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 206.823 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0292 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Units of measure for Concentration is grains/dry standard cubic feet 369.853 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0523 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Units of measure for Concentration is grains/dry standard cubic feet 96.304 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0136 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Units of measure for Concentration is grains/dry standard cubic feet 55.272 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0078 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Units of measure for Concentration is grains/dry standard cubic feet

Page 74sampling_run_pollutants1 run_pollutant_comment Typical concentration for PM is presented in grains/dry standard cubic feet. Concentration for this PM (Filterable) sampling run was 0.0097 grains/dscf.PM (Filterable) values includes PM10 (Filterable) values. Typical concentration for PM is presented in grains/dry standard cubic feet. Concentration for this PM (Condensable) sampling run was 0.0174 grains/dscf. Typical concentration for PM10 is presented in grains/dry standard cubic feet. Concentration for this PM10 (Filterable) sampling run was 0.0238 grains/dscf.

Units of measure for Concentration is grains/dry standard cubic feet Units of measure for Concentration is grains/dry standard cubic feet Units of measure for Concentration is grains/dry standard cubic feet Units of measure for Concentration is grains/dry standard cubic feet

Page 75sampling_run_pollutants1 Typical concentration for PM is presented in grains/dry standard cubic feet. Concentration for this PM (Filterable) sampling run was 0.0097 grains/dscf.PM (Filterable) values includes PM10 (Filterable) values. Typical concentration for PM is presented in grains/dry standard cubic feet. Concentration for this PM (Condensable) sampling run was 0.0174 grains/dscf. Typical concentration for PM10 is presented in grains/dry standard cubic feet. Concentration for this PM10 (Filterable) sampling run was 0.0238 grains/dscf.

Page 76sampling_run_fuel

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id run_id fuel_pollutant fuel_conc fuel_conc_units fuel_conc_ND

fuel_conc_MDL 6254 OGS1-Hg-20061012

ESP-Outlet-1

average Mercury

(Hg) 0.1 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6254 OGS1-Hg-20070726

ESP-Outlet-1

average Mercury

(Hg) 0.05 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6254 OGS1-Metals-20060615

U1-Stack average Antim ony (Sb) 5 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6254 OGS1-Metals-20060615

U1-Stack average Chromium (Cr) 1347 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6254 OGS1-Metals-20060615

U1-Stack average Lead (Pb) 22 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6254 OGS1-Metals-20060615

U1-Stack average Manganese (Mn) 20 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6254 OGS1-Metals-20060615

U1-Stack average Mercury (Hg) 0.07 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6254 OGS1-Metals-20060615

U1-Stack average Nickel (Ni) 5 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6254 OGS1-PM-20060615

Stack-1 average Antim ony (Sb) 5 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6254 OGS1-PM-20060615

Stack-1 average Chromium (Cr) 1347 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6254 OGS1-PM-20060615

Stack-1 average Lead (Pb) 22 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6254 OGS1-PM-20060615

Stack-1 average Manganese (Mn) 20 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6254 OGS1-PM-20060615

Stack-1 average Mercury (Hg) 0.07 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6254 OGS1-PM-20060615

Stack-1 average Nickel (Ni) 5 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE

Page 77sampling_run_fuel fuel_conc_MDL

Page 78