alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 33.122 Pass-through funding for approved waivers. ( a ) *Pass-through funding.* With respect to a State's approved section 1332 waiver, under which, due to the structure of the approved State waiver plan, individuals and small employers in the State would not qualify for or would qualify for a reduced amount of premium tax credit under section 36B of the Internal Revenue Code, small business tax credit under section 45R of the Internal Revenue Code, or cost-sharing reductions under ACA part I of subtitle E for which they would otherwise be eligible, the Secretary and the Secretary of the Health and Human Services shall provide for an alternative means by which the aggregate amount of such credits or reductions that would have been paid on behalf of participants in the Exchanges had the State not received such waiver shall be paid to the State for purposes of implementing the approved State waiver plan. Such amount shall be determined annually by the Secretary and the Secretary of Health and Human Services, taking into consideration the experience of other States with respect to participation in an Exchange and credits and reductions provided under such provisions to residents of the other States. This amount can be updated to reflect applicable changes in Federal or State law.
( b ) [Reserved]
[86 FR 53502, Sept. 27, 2021]
EXHIBIT 32.2


                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of JACOBS  FINANCIAL  GROUP,  INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  February 28, 2006 (the "Report")
filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission,  I, Robert L. Neal,  Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Company's  Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



         April 19, 2006                         /s/ Robert L. Neal
                                                    --------------------------
                                                    Robert L. Neal
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. FDA-2009-D-0348]

# AGENCY:

 Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

 Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                         The Food and Drug Administration is correcting a notice that appeared in the                         **Federal Register**                         of August 3, 2009 (74 FR 38439). The document announced the availability of a draft guidance entitled “Guidance for Industry: Guide to Minimize Microbial Food Safety Hazards of Leafy Greens.” The document was published with an incorrect date for submitting written or electronic comments on the draft guidance. This document corrects that error.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Amy Green, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-317), Food and Drug Administration, 5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740, 301-436-2025.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In FR Doc. E9-18451, appearing on page 38439 in the                     **Federal Register**                     of August 3, 2009, the following correction is made:                 

                    1. On page 38439, in the third column, in the “                    **DATES**                    ” section, in the eighth line, “October 2, 2009” is corrected to read “November 2, 2009”.                

Dated: August 17, 2009.

David Horowitz,

Assistant Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-20101 Filed 8-20-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
# Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs Releases

2662 items

        -    Fact Sheet  		2024 Indo-Pacific Business Forum Forges New Collaborations, Spurs Innovation, and Drives Investment	  May 22, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		On the Situation in Burma’s Rakhine State	  Matthew MillerMay 21, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		United States, Philippines, and Japan Launch the Luzon Economic Corridor Steering Committee to Drive Infrastructure Investment	  May 21, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Special Envoy Turner’s Travel to the Republic of Korea	  May 20, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Timor-Leste National Day	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 19, 2024 
        -    Readout  		Secretary Blinken’s Call with Republic of Korea Foreign Minister Cho	  May 17, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary Toloui Travel to Japan, the Republic of Korea, Vietnam, the Philippines, Singapore, California, and New York April 22 to May 8	  May 17, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Assistant Secretary Kritenbrink’s Travel to the Philippines for the Indo-Pacific Business Forum	  May 17, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		On the Case of Zhang Zhan	  Matthew MillerMay 16, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Rewards for Justice – Reward Offer for Information on North Korean IT Workers	  May 16, 2024 

previous page12345…267next page

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the Coordinator on Global Anti-Corruption...Office of the Coordinator on Global Anti Corruption  Releases

# Office of the Coordinator on Global Anti-Corruption Releases

19 items

        -    Media Note  		Coordinator on Global Anti-Corruption Nephew’s Travel to Malaysia and Australia	  May 8, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Recognizing the 25th Anniversary of the Council of Europe’s Group of States Against Corruption	  May 1, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Designation of Former Malawi Public Officials for Significant Corruption        	  Matthew MillerApril 17, 2024 
        -    Testimony  		Testimony Before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee: Implementation of the U.S. Anti-Corruption Strategy	  Richard NephewMarch 21, 2024Senate Foreign Relations CommitteeWashington, D.C. 
        -    Press Statement  		Designation of Western Balkan Officials Due to Involvement in Significant Corruption  	  Matthew MillerMarch 18, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Coordinator on Global Anti-Corruption Richard Nephew’s Travel to Panama	  March 4, 2024 
        -    Media Note  		Coordinator on Global Anti-Corruption Nephew’s Travel to Ecuador, Peru, and Paraguay	  February 26, 2024 
        -    Press Statement  		Imposing Sanctions on Former Guatemalan Official for Corruption	  Matthew MillerJanuary 17, 2024 
        -    Fact Sheet  		Leveraging Tools to Promote Accountability and Counter Global Corruption	  December 11, 2023 
        -    Press Statement  		Promoting Accountability for Corruption Globally 	  Antony J. BlinkenDecember 11, 2023 

12next page

Back to Top
#### § 560.419 U.S. employment of persons ordinarily resident in Iran.

The prohibitions in § 560.201 make it unlawful to hire an Iranian national ordinarily resident in Iran to come to the United States solely or for the principal purpose of engaging in employment on behalf of an entity in Iran or as the employee of a U.S. person, unless authorized pursuant to § 560.505. *See also* § 560.418 with respect to the release of technology and software.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 255 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 255

  To designate the Federal Justice Building in Miami, Florida, as the 
           ``James Lawrence King Federal Justice Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

    Mr. Hastings of Florida (for himself and Mrs. Meek of Florida) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To designate the Federal Justice Building in Miami, Florida, as the 
           ``James Lawrence King Federal Justice Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal Justice Building located at 99 Northeast Fourth Street 
in Miami, Florida, shall be known and designated as the ``James 
Lawrence King Federal Justice Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``James Lawrence 
King Federal Justice Building''.

                                 <all>
```
FERPA’s Annual Notification of Rights Requirement (34 CFR § 99.7)

There are approximately 20,629 school districts and postsecondary institutions 

affected by these provisions. We estimate that an average of .25 hours (15 minutes) 

per response is required for the annual notification of rights requirement. From 

administrative experience, we have determined that, at the elementary/secondary

level, school districts (as opposed to individual schools) are the entities that typically 

issue the annual notification of FERPA rights. At the postsecondary level, it is the 

individual institutions that issue the notice. Following is a breakdown of school 

districts and postsecondary institutions:

No. School Districts: 14,166

 Burden Hours: x .25

Total Burden Hours = 3,541.50 

No. Postsec. Inst.: 6,463

Burden Hours: x .25

Total Burden Hours = 1,615.75

School District Burden Hours: 3,541.50

Postsec. Inst. Burden Hours: + 1,615.75

Grand Total Burden Hours: 5,157.25

Since most agencies and institutions met major requirements during the early years 

after FERPA’s passage in 1974 and after publication of the revised regulations in 

1988, the year-to-year cost is minimal.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 161 (Friday, August 21, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42235-42245]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20004]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal Nos. 09-35]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 
601-3740.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittals 09-35 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

    Dated: August 12, 2009.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 42236]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21AU09.018


[[Page 42237]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21AU09.019


[[Page 42238]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21AU09.020


[[Page 42239]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21AU09.021


[[Page 42240]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21AU09.022


[[Page 42241]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21AU09.023


[[Page 42242]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21AU09.024


[[Page 42243]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21AU09.025


[[Page 42244]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21AU09.026


[[Page 42245]]


[FR Doc. E9-20004 Filed 8-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2689

To designate the United States Courthouse located at 301 West Main Street

in Benton, Illinois, as the ‘‘James L. Foreman United States Courthouse’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 29, 1995

Mr. POSHARD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To designate the United States Courthouse located at 301

West Main Street in Benton, Illinois, as the ‘‘James

L. Foreman United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The United States Courthouse located at 301 West

5 Main Street in Benton, Illinois, shall be known and des6 ignated as the ‘‘James L. Foreman United States Court7 house’’.

8 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

9 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

10 paper, or other record of the United States to the building
2

•HR 2689 IH

1 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

2 to the ‘‘James L. Foreman United States Courthouse’’.

Æ
§ 562.203 Holding of funds in interest-bearing accounts; investment and reinvestment. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraphs (c) or (d) of this section, or as otherwise directed by the Office of Foreign Assets Control, any U.S. person holding funds, such as currency, bank deposits, or liquidated financial obligations, subject to § 562.201 shall hold or place such funds in a blocked interest-bearing account located in the United States.
( b ) ( 1 ) For purposes of this section, the term *blocked interest-bearing account* means a blocked account: ( i ) In a Federally-insured U.S. bank, thrift institution, or credit union, provided the funds are earning interest at rates that are commercially reasonable; or
( ii ) With a broker or dealer registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a *et seq.*), provided the funds are invested in a money market fund or in U.S. Treasury bills.
( 2 ) For purposes of this section, a rate is commercially reasonable if it is the rate currently offered to other depositors on deposits or instruments of comparable size and maturity.
( 3 ) Funds held or placed in a blocked account described in paragraph (b) of this section may not be invested in instruments the maturity of which exceeds 180 days. If interest is credited to a separate blocked account or subaccount, the name of the account party on each account must be the same.
( c ) Blocked funds held in instruments the maturity of which exceeds 180 days at the time the funds become subject to § 562.201 may continue to be held until maturity in the original instrument, provided any interest, earnings, or other proceeds derived therefrom are paid into a blocked interest-bearing account as described in paragraphs (b) or (d) of this section.
( d ) Blocked funds held in accounts or instruments outside the United States at the time the funds become subject to § 562.201 may continue to be held in the same type of accounts or instruments, provided the funds earn interest at rates that are commercially reasonable.
( e ) This section does not create an affirmative obligation for the holder of blocked tangible property, such as chattels or real estate, or of other blocked property, such as debt or equity securities, to sell or liquidate such property. However, the Office of Foreign Assets Control may issue licenses permitting or directing such sales or liquidation in appropriate cases.
( f ) Funds subject to this section may not be held, invested, or reinvested in a manner that provides immediate financial or economic benefit or access to any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 562.201, nor may their holder cooperate in or facilitate the pledging or other attempted use as collateral of blocked funds or other assets.
NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION

——. GRAVITY MAP
SEER —_——— = —_—_—_— — —— — — —
8 — Tee =
Fre et ur Lome
} er perenne nar a = T |
oa i
N
=
7
o
-
=,
i,
1
\
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
i
|
a
{
4
|
|
|
4
|
{
1
|
jn
|
|
|
|
1
1
i
|
|
|
ot hd
ir
k.
|
|
ae
wistyadale wa
L a =
i E iD
PUI DNS Its eve TT a WY EPO De L \
<<. ee

®

NOS SEAMAP SERIES
NORTH PACIFIC OCEAN

NOS 15248-14 G

meer B00

Paneenone at tombingnen.

U.S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
WATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMIAISTRATION
NATIONAL OCEAN SURVEY
1973

Lambert Conteemal Come Proyection

Semie 2: 1,000,000
[fnandaed Paraben 43? and 33")
#### Levi P. Westervelt, Respondent, *against*The Fuller Manufacturing Company, Appellant.

(Decided December 7th, 1885).

By a written agreement reciting that plaintiff was the inventor of certain improvements, he agreed to sign all papers necessary to secure a patent for the invention, to request the issue of letters patent therefor to defen*353dant, and to do all that would be necessary to vest the title to the invention in defendant; in consideration of which defendant agreed to pay him a specified sum. Ho patent was ever obtained for the invention, and it appeared that none ever could be obtained, an earlier patent therefor having been issued to another person. *Held,*that there was a total failure of consideration of the contract, which would defeat a recovery of the sum agreed to be paid.

Appeal from a judgment of the District Court in the City of New York for the Sixth Judicial District.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*E. P.*Wilder, for appellant.

*Dillaway, Davenport &*Leeds, for respondent.

Larremore, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff to recover upon an alleged contract to pay him one hundred dollars for all his right and interest in a certain invention, he to sign all.papers necessary to secure the patent.

The agreement commenced with the following recital: Whereas I am the inventor of “ certain improvements in monkey wrenches.” Five dollars Avere paid on the execution of the contract, by which it was stipulated that the further sum of ninety-five dollars should be paid thereafter. The plaintiff further agreed to sign all papers necessary to secure a patent for the invention, and to request and authorize the Commissioner of Patents to issue such letters patent unto the defendant, and to do all else that would be necessary to vest the title in said invention in the defendant.

No patent was ever obtained for the invention ; and, as apj)ears from the evidence, none could be obtained, for the reason that an earlier patent for the same invention had been issued to another party.

If a patent had been issued upon the plaintiff’s alleged invention, and the defendant had acted upon it, he would not have been allowed to question its legality, under the rulings in *Smith*v. *Standard Laundry Mach. Co.*(11 Daly *354156); *Hyatt*v. *Ingalls*(49 N. Y. Super. Ct. 375); *Union Manuf. Co. of Norwalk*v. *Lounsbury*(41 N. Y. 363).

It is apparent from the testimony in this case that the patentability of the invention was the consideration of the agreement referred to, and such patent not having been issued, there was a total failure of the consideration of the contract, which the plaintiff has never fully performed. For this reason, I think the judgment appealed from should be affirmed.

Having reached this conclusion, it is unnecessary to consider the other points raised in the case.

J. F. Daly and Van Hoesen, JJ., concurred.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 347.2 Official agencies. ( a ) Fiscal Service is responsible for administering Treasury's retirement savings program and for issuing the retirement savings bonds to the IRA custodian for Treasury's retirement savings program and to the Auto-IRA custodians for certain state Auto-IRA programs. The states are responsible for administering their Auto-IRA retirement savings programs, including the designation of Auto-IRA custodians to perform all operational responsibilities associated with the retirement savings bonds issued by Fiscal Service.
( b ) Communications concerning transactions relating to an individual's IRA should be addressed to the appropriate custodian.
[82 FR 6246, Jan. 19, 2017]
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 375.12 How do I submit an offer?

As a submitter, you must submit an offer in a tender to the Treasury via the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. You must submit any tenders in an approved format and the Bank must receive them prior to the closing time stated in the redemption operation announcement. If we do not receive your tenders timely, we will reject them. Your tenders are binding on you after the closing time specified in the redemption operation announcement. You are responsible for ensuring that we receive your tenders on time. We will not be responsible in any way for any unauthorized tender submissions or for any delays, errors, or omissions in submitting tenders.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1393

To direct the Secretary of the Army to carry out an environmental restoration

project at the Eastern Channel of the Lockwoods Folly River, Brunswick

County, North Carolina.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 4, 1995

Mr. ROSE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of the Army to carry out an environmental restoration project at the Eastern Channel of

the Lockwoods Folly River, Brunswick County, North

Carolina.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LOCKWOODS FOLLY RIVER, BRUNSWICK COUN4 TY, NORTH CAROLINA.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Army shall

6 carry out a project under section 1135 of the Water Re7 sources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4251–4252;

8 33 U.S.C. 2309a) at the Eastern Channel of the
2

•HR 1393 IH

1 Lockwoods Folly River, Brunswick County, North Caro2 lina.

3 (b) PROJECT FEATURES.—In carrying out the

4 project under subsection (a), the Secretary shall open the

5 Old Eastern Navigation Channel at the mouth of the

6 Lockwoods Folly River in Brunswick County, North Caro7 lina, and partially close the present ocean channel between

8 the west end of Sheep Island and the northeast point of

9 Holden Beach.

10 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is

11 authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section

12 $5,000,000 for fiscal years beginning after September 30,

13 1995. Such sums shall remain available until expended.

Æ