59798 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 189 / Monday, September 30, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 

holding company pursuant to section 

165(i)(2) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street 

Reform and Consumer Protection Act, 

changes in regulatory capital ratios and 

any other capital ratios specified by the 

Board of the depository institution 

subsidiary over the planning horizon, 

including an explanation of the most 

significant causes for the changes in 

regulatory capital ratios. 

(2) State member banks that are 

subsidiaries of bank holding companies. 

A state member bank that is a subsidiary 

of a bank holding company will satisfy 

the public disclosure requirements 

under section 165(i)(2) of the DoddFrank Wall Street Reform and Consumer 

Protection Act when the bank holding 

company publicly discloses summary 

results of its stress test pursuant to this 

section or section 252.148 of this part, 

unless the Board determines that the 

disclosures at the holding company 

level do not adequately capture the 

potential impact of the scenarios on the 

capital of the state member bank. In this 

case, the state member bank must make 

the same disclosure as required by 

paragraph (b)(3) of this section. 

(3) State member banks that are not 

subsidiaries of bank holding companies. 

A state member bank that is not a 

subsidiary of a bank holding company 

must disclose, at a minimum, the 

following information regarding the 

severely adverse scenario: 

(i) A description of the types of risks 

being included in the stress test; 

(ii) A summary description of the 

methodologies used in the stress test; 

(iii) Estimates of— 

(A) Aggregate losses; 

(B) Pre-provision net revenue 

(C) Provision for loan and lease losses; 

(D) Net income; and 

(E) Pro forma regulatory capital ratios 

and any other capital ratios specified by 

the Board; and 

(iv) An explanation of the most 

significant causes for the changes in 

regulatory capital ratios. 

(c) Content of results. (1) The 

disclosure of aggregate losses, preprovision net revenue, provision for 

loan and lease losses, and net income 

that is required under paragraph (b) of 

this section must be on a cumulative 

basis over the planning horizon. 

(2) The disclosure of pro forma 

regulatory capital ratios and any other 

capital ratios specified by the Board that 

is required under paragraph (b) of this 

section must include the beginning 

value, ending value and minimum value 

of each ratio over the planning horizon. 

By order of the Board of Governors of the 

Federal Reserve System, September 24, 2013. 

Robert deV. Frierson, 

Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 2013–23619 Filed 9–27–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210–01–P 

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 

13 CFR Part 125 

RIN 3245–AG22 

Small Business Subcontracting: 

Correction 

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business 

Administration. 

ACTION: Correcting amendments. 

SUMMARY: This document contains 

corrections to the final regulations [FR 

Doc. 2013–169671, which were 

published in the Federal Register on 

Tuesday, July 16, 2013 (78 FR 42391). 

The document amended SBA’s 

regulations governing small business 

subcontracting to implement provisions 

of the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010. 

This correction amends a crossreference contained in the regulations. 

DATES: Effective September 30, 2013 and 

is applicable beginning August 15, 2013. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Dean Koppel, Office of Government 

Contracting, U.S. Small Business 

Administration, 409 Third Street SW., 

8th Floor, Washington, DC 20416. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 16, 2013, at 78 FR 42392 

(available at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/

pkg/FR-2013-07-16/pdf/2013- 

16967.pdf). SBA published a final rule 

on subcontracting to implement 

provisions of the Small Business Jobs 

Act of 2010. 

The final rule established SBA’s 

policies for subcontracting compliance, 

including assignment of compliance 

responsibilities between contracting 

offices, small business offices, and 

program offices. Need for correction. 

As published, the final regulations 

contain incorrect cross-references which 

may prove to be misleading and need to 

be clarified. The cross reference in 13 

CFR section 125.3(g)(4) to ‘‘paragraphs 

(g)(2)(i) and (g)(2)(ii)’’ is corrected to 

refer to ‘‘paragraphs (g)(1)(i) and 

(g)(1)(ii).’’ 

List of Subjects in 13 CFR Part 125 

Government contracting programs, 

Small business subcontracting program. 

Accordingly, 13 CFR Part 125 is 

corrected by making the following 

correcting amendments: 

PART 125—GOVERNMENT 

CONTRACTING PROGRAMS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 125 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 15 U.S.C. 632(p), (q); 634(b)(6); 

637; 644 and 657(f); Pub. L. 111–240, section 

1321. 

§ 125.3 [Amended] 

■ 2. Amend paragraph (g)(4) of § 125.3 

to read as follows: 

§ 125.3 Subcontracting assistance. 

* * * * * 

(g) * * * 

(4) A contracting officer shall include 

a significant evaluation factor for the 

criteria described in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) 

and (g)(1)(ii) of this section in a bundled 

contract or order as defined in § 125.2. 

* * * * * 

Dated: September 19, 2013. 

Calvin Jenkins, 

Deputy Associate Administrator for 

Government Contracting and Business 

Development. 

[FR Doc. 2013–23257 Filed 9–27–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025–01–M 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2012–0985; Directorate 

Identifier 2011–NM–250–AD; Amendment 

39–17585; AD 2013–19–03] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing 

Company Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for certain 

The Boeing Company Model 737–600, 

–700, –700C, –800, –900, and –900ER 

series airplanes. This AD was prompted 

by a report of chafing damage to a wire 

bundle that was arcing to hydraulic 

tubing and caused by insufficient 

separation between the wire bundle and 

the hydraulic tubing in the main 

landing gear (MLG) wheel well. This AD 

requires an inspection for damage of 

wire bundles and hydraulic tubing on 

the right side of the forward bulkhead 

of the MLG wheel well; installation of 

new clamps; and corrective actions, as 

applicable. We are issuing this AD to 

detect and correct possible damage 

caused by insufficient separation 

between the wire bundles and hydraulic 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 189 / Monday, September 30, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 59799 

tubing to prevent electrical arcing in a 

flammable fluid leakage zone, which 

could lead to a wheel well fire. 

DATES: This AD is effective November 4, 

2013. 

The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

of a certain publication listed in the AD 

as of November 4, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: For service information 

identified in this AD, contact Boeing 

Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data 

& Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, 

MC 2H–65, Seattle, Washington 98124– 

2207; telephone 206–544–5000, 

extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; Internet 

https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You 

may review copies of the referenced 

service information at the FAA, 

Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 

Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. 

For information on the availability of 

this material at the FAA, call 425–227– 

1221. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov; or in person at the 

Docket Management Facility between 9 

a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD 

docket contains this AD, the regulatory 

evaluation, any comments received, and 

other information. The address for the 

Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is 

Document Management Facility, U.S. 

Department of Transportation, Docket 

Operations, M–30, West Building 

Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, 

DC 20590. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Marie Hogestad, Aerospace Engineer, 

Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM– 

130S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification 

Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, 

WA 98057–3356; phone: (425) 917– 

6418; fax: (425) 917–6590; email: 

marie.hogestad@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Discussion 

We issued a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR 

part 39 to include an AD that would 

apply to the specified products. The 

NPRM published in the Federal 

Register on September 20, 2012 (77 FR 

58334). The NPRM proposed to require 

an inspection for damage of wire 

bundles and hydraulic tubing on the 

right side of the forward bulkhead of the 

MLG wheel well; installation of new 

clamps; and corrective actions, as 

applicable. 

Comments 

We gave the public the opportunity to 

participate in developing this AD. The 

following presents the comments 

received on the proposal (77 FR 58334, 

September 20, 2012) and the FAA’s 

response to each comment. 

Request To Refer to Revised Service 

Information 

United Airlines (United) requested 

that we refer to the latest revision of the 

service information in this final rule. 

We agree with United’s request, since 

Boeing has issued Special Attention 

Service Bulletin 737–29–1113, Revision 

1, dated March 29, 2013. That service 

information removes airplanes from the 

effectivity, which were reworked during 

production and on which the change 

specified in Boeing Special Attention 

Service Bulletin 737–29–1113, Revision 

1, dated March 29, 2013, has already 

been incorporated. We have revised 

paragraph (g) of this final rule to refer 

to that revised service information, 

added a new paragraph (h) to this final 

rule to allow credit for previous actions 

done using Boeing Special Attention 

Service Bulletin 737–29–1113, dated 

March 23, 2011. Subsequent paragraphs 

have been redesignated accordingly. 

Request To Clarify Source of 

Applicability Exclusions 

American Airlines (American), Delta 

Airlines (Delta), and United requested 

that we revise the NPRM (77 FR 58334, 

September 20, 2012) to clarify the 

source of the airplane line numbers 

excluded from the applicability 

paragraph which do not appear in 

Boeing Special Attention Service 

Bulletin 737–29–1113, dated March 23, 

2011, or in Boeing Service Bulletin 

Information Notice 737–29–1113 IN 01, 

dated May 20, 2011, and correct the 

source of the applicability information 

in the ‘‘Differences Between the 

Proposed AD and the Service 

Information’’ paragraph. 

We partially agree. Boeing identified 

those airplanes that were reworked 

during production, and communicated 

the excluded line numbers to the FAA 

prior to the issuance of the NPRM (77 

FR 58334, September 20, 2012). Boeing 

Special Attention Service Bulletin 737– 

29–1113, Revision 1, dated March 29, 

2013, reduced the number of affected 

airplanes. We have revised paragraph (c) 

of this final rule to identify those 

airplanes which are affected by this AD. 

Because the ‘‘Differences Between 

Proposed AD and the Service 

Information’’ paragraph is not restated 

in the preamble of the final rule, we 

have not made any change to the final 

rule in that regard. 

Request To Simplify Applicability 

United requested that the 

applicability statement of the NPRM (77 

FR 58334, September 20, 2012) be 

simplified to clearly state which 

airplanes are affected by the AD. 

We agree with United’s request. We 

have revised paragraph (c) of this final 

rule to match the line numbers as listed 

in Boeing Special Attention Service 

Bulletin 737–29–1113, Revision 1, dated 

March 29, 2013. We have coordinated 

this change with Boeing. 

Request To Clarify Applicability 

United requested that the 

applicability statement of the NPRM (77 

FR 58334, September 20, 2012) be 

clarified since it differs from the service 

bulletin. United stated that Boeing 

Special Attention Service Bulletin 737– 

29–1113, dated March 23, 2011, 

contains a conditional statement for the 

required clamp installation based on 

whether there is sufficient separation 

between the wire bundle and hydraulic 

tubing. United reasoned that operators 

may elect not to install new clamps if 

they find sufficient separation between 

the wire bundling and hydraulic tubing. 

We disagree with United’s request 

because the NPRM (77 FR 58334, 

September 20, 2012) did not include the 

implied conditional applicability. This 

final rule applies to all airplanes listed 

in paragraph (c) of this AD regardless of 

separation between the hydraulic tubing 

and wire bundles. We have changed 

paragraph (c) of this AD to match the 

line numbers as listed in Boeing Special 

Attention Service Bulletin 737–29– 

1113, Revision 1, dated March 29, 2013, 

since this new revision of the service 

bulletin was released since the issuance 

of the NPRM. 

Request To Verify Excluded Airplane 

Line Numbers (L/Ns) Are Correct 

American and Delta requested that the 

FAA verify the excluded airplane L/Ns 

are correct in paragraph (c) 

‘‘Applicability’’ of the NPRM (77 FR 

58334, September 20, 2012) because 

there were discrepancies between the 

NPRM, Boeing Service Bulletin 

Information Notice (IN) 737–29–1113 IN 

01, dated May 20, 2011, and Boeing 

Special Attention Service Bulletin 737– 

29–1113, dated March 23, 2011. 

American and Delta stated they had 

airplanes that should not be included in 

the effectivity since they did not have 

the hydraulic tubing that is referred to 

in the service information installed. 

American and Delta confirmed through 

a review of the applicable airplane 

illustrated parts catalogs that certain 

L/Ns did not have the hydraulic tubing 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

59800 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 189 / Monday, September 30, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 

installed (i.e. American L/Ns 3307, 

3328, 3334, 3340, and 3347; Delta L/N 

3338). American stated that two of its 

airplanes did have the hydraulic tubing 

installed (American L/Ns 3291 and 

3298). 

We agree to provide clarification. The 

airplane L/Ns listed by both American 

and Delta are excluded airplane L/Ns. 

The FAA has verified with Boeing that 

the correct airplane L/Ns are listed in 

the NPRM (77 FR 58334, September 20, 

2012) and match the airplane L/Ns in 

Boeing Special Attention Service 

Bulletin 737–29–1113, Revision 1, dated 

March 29, 2013. As stated previously, 

we have revised paragraph (c) of this 

final rule to identify those airplanes that 

are affected by this AD. This change has 

been coordinated with Boeing. 

Request To Add Inspection for Clamps 

Already Installed 

United requested that the NPRM (77 

FR 58334, September 20, 2012) be 

revised to include an inspection to look 

for clamps already installed prior to 

performing the required work, and if 

found, to check the part number of the 

subject clamp. United stated that if the 

clamp is not a part number listed in 

Boeing Special Attention Service 

Bulletin 737–29–1113, Revision 1, dated 

March 29, 2013, it should be replaced. 

United stated it found at least one 

aircraft with clamps installed on the 

right side of the forward bulkhead of the 

MLG wheel well and that it has revised 

its work instructions to include the 

clamp installation and part number 

inspection. 

We disagree with United’s request to 

add an inspection to look for clamps 

already installed prior to performing the 

required work because Boeing has 

confirmed that the airplane mentioned 

by United is among those listed as an 

excluded line number, meaning it was 

already reworked during production. 

Because both this final rule and Boeing 

Special Attention Service Bulletin 737– 

29–1113, Revision 1, dated March 29, 

2013, require installation of new clamps 

with the correct part number, we have 

not made any change to this final rule 

in that regard. 

Statement Regarding Installation of 

Winglets 

Aviation Partners Boeing (APB) stated 

that the installation of winglets per 

supplemental type certificate (STC) 

ST00830SE (http://rgl.faa.gov/

Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/

rgstc.nsf/0/408E012E008

616A78625788800604

56C?OpenDocument&Highlight=

st00830se) does not affect the actions 

specified in the NPRM (77 FR 58334, 

September 20, 2012). 

We concur. We have redesignated 

paragraph (c) of the NPRM (77 FR 

58334, September 20, 2012) as 

paragraph (c)(1) in this final rule, added 

paragraph (c)(2) to this final rule, which 

states that STC ST00830SE (http:// 

rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_

Library/rgstc.nsf/0/408E012E008616A7

862578880060456C?OpenDocument&

Highlight=st00830se) does not affect the 

ability to accomplish the actions 

required by this AD. Therefore, for 

airplanes on which STC ST00830SE is 

installed, a ‘‘change in product’’ 

alternative method of compliance 

(AMOC) approval request is not 

necessary to comply with the 

requirements of Section 39.17 of the 

Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 

39.17). For all other AMOC requests, the 

operator must request approval of an 

AMOC in accordance with the 

procedures specified in paragraph (i) of 

this AD. 

Conclusion 

We reviewed the relevant data, 

considered the comments received, and 

determined that air safety and the 

public interest require adopting this AD 

with the changes described previously 

and minor editorial changes. We have 

determined that these minor changes: 

• Are consistent with the intent that 

was proposed in the NPRM (77 FR 

58334, September 20, 2012) for 

correcting the unsafe condition; and 

• Do not add any additional burden 

upon the public than was already 

proposed in the NPRM (77 FR 58334, 

September 20, 2012). 

We also determined that these 

changes will not increase the economic 

burden on any operator or increase the 

scope of this AD. 

Costs of Compliance 

We estimate that this AD affects 520 

airplanes of U.S. registry. 

We estimate the following costs to 

comply with this AD: 

ESTIMATED COSTS

Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per 

product 

Cost on U.S. 

operators 

Inspection and installation ................ 2 work-hours × $85 per hour = $170 ............................ $0 $170 $88,400 

We have received no definitive data 

that would enable us to provide labor 

cost estimates for the on-condition 

actions (repairing or replacing of 

damaged wire bundles and damaged 

hydraulic tubing) specified in this AD. 

According to the manufacturer, some 

of the costs of this AD may be covered 

under warranty, thereby reducing the 

cost impact on affected individuals. We 

do not control warranty coverage for 

affected individuals. As a result, we 

have included all costs in our cost 

estimate. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

This AD will not have federalism 

implications under Executive Order 

13132. This AD will not have a 

substantial direct effect on the States, on 

the relationship between the national 

government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify that this AD: 

(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866, 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 189 / Monday, September 30, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 59801 

(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), 

(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation 

in Alaska, and 

(4) Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

Adoption of the Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as 

follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new airworthiness 

directive (AD): 

2013–19–03 The Boeing Company: 

Amendment 39–17585; Docket No. 

FAA–2012–0985; Directorate Identifier 

2011–NM–250–AD. 

(a) Effective Date 

This AD is effective November 4, 2013. 

(b) Affected ADs 

None. 

(c) Applicability 

(1) This AD applies to The Boeing 

Company Model 737–600, –700, –700C, 

–800, –900, and –900ER series airplanes, 

certificated in any category, line numbers 

(L/Ns) 1060 through 3289 inclusive, and 

3294, but excluding L/Ns 3138, 3158, 3169, 

3175, 3216, 3224, 3253, and 3274. 

(2) Installation of Supplemental Type 

Certificate (STC) ST00830SE(http:// 

rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_

Library/rgstc.nsf/0/408E012E008616A786257

8880060456C?OpenDocument&Highlight

=st00830se) does not affect the ability to 

accomplish the actions required by this AD. 

Therefore, for airplanes on which STC 

ST00830SE is installed, a ‘‘change in 

product’’ alternative method of compliance 

(AMOC) approval request is not necessary to 

comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 

39.17. 

(d) Subject 

Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/ 

Air Transport Association (ATA) of America 

Code 29, Hydraulic Power. 

(e) Unsafe Condition 

This AD was prompted by a report of 

chafing damage to a wire bundle that was 

arcing to hydraulic tubing and caused by 

insufficient separation between the wire 

bundle and the hydraulic tubing in the main 

landing gear (MLG) wheel well. We are 

issuing this AD to detect and correct possible 

damage caused by insufficient separation 

between the wire bundles and hydraulic 

tubing to prevent electrical arcing in a 

flammable fluid leakage zone, which could 

lead to a wheel well fire. 

(f) Compliance 

Comply with this AD within the 

compliance times specified, unless already 

done. 

(g) Inspection and Installation 

Within 24 months after the effective date 

of this AD: Do a general visual inspection of 

hydraulic tubing having part numbers (P/Ns) 

272A4451–136 and 272A4451–137, and wire 

bundles W6128, W7122, W8122, and W8222 

for wire chafing or damage, install new 

clamps in the right MLG wheel well, and do 

all applicable corrective actions, in 

accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of Boeing Special Attention 

Service Bulletin 737–29–1113, Revision 1, 

dated March 29, 2013. All corrective actions 

must be done before further flight. 

(h) Credit for Previous Actions 

This paragraph provides credit for the 

corresponding actions specified in paragraph 

(g) of this AD, if those actions were 

performed before the effective date of this AD 

using Boeing Special Attention Service 

Bulletin 737–29–1113, dated March 23, 2011, 

which is not incorporated by reference in this 

AD. 

(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft 

Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the 

authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if 

requested using the procedures found in 14 

CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, 

send your request to your principal inspector 

or local Flight Standards District Office, as 

appropriate. If sending information directly 

to the manager of the ACO, send it to the 

attention of the person identified in 

paragraph (j)(1) of this AD. Information may 

be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOCRequests@faa.gov. 

(2) Before using any approved AMOC, 

notify your appropriate principal inspector, 

or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 

of the local flight standards district office/ 

certificate holding district office. 

(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable 

level of safety may be used for any repair 

required by this AD if it is approved by the 

Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization 

Designation Authorization (ODA) that has 

been authorized by the Manager, Seattle 

ACO, to make those findings. For a repair 

method to be approved, the repair must meet 

the certification basis of the airplane, and the 

approval must specifically refer to this AD. 

(j) Related Information 

(1) For more information about this AD, 

contact Marie Hogestad, Aerospace Engineer, 

Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM–130S, 

FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 

1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057– 

3356; phone: (425) 917–6418; fax: (425) 917– 

6590; email: marie.hogestad@faa.gov. 

(2) Service information identified in but 

not incorporated by reference in this AD may 

be obtained at the addresses specified in 

paragraphs (k)(3) and (k)(4) of this AD. 

(k) Material Incorporated by Reference 

(1) The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

(IBR) of the service information listed in this 

paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR 

part 51. 

(2) You must use this service information 

as applicable to do the actions required by 

this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. 

(i) Boeing Special Attention Service 

Bulletin 737–29–1113, Revision 1, dated 

March 29, 2013. 

(ii) Reserved. 

(3) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Boeing Commercial 

Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services 

Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65, 

Seattle, Washington 98124–2207; telephone 

206–544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766– 

5680; Internet https:// 

www.myboeingfleet.com. 

(4) You may review copies of the service 

information at the FAA, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, 

WA. For information on the availability of 

this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

(5) You may view this service information 

that is incorporated by reference at the 

National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA). For information on 

the availability of this material at NARA, call 

202–741–6030, or go to: http:// 

www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on 

September 10, 2013. 

Jeffrey E. Duven, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2013–23464 Filed 9–27–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2012–0723; Directorate 

Identifier 2011–NM–137–AD; Amendment 

39–17586; AD 2013–19–04] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; the Boeing 

Company Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for certain 

The Boeing Company Model 737–600, 

–700, –700C, –800, and –900 series 

airplanes. This AD was prompted by a 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES