alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2010

- NM

- 257

- AD

Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

TRAVIS LEE KENDRICK
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 559

[ November 22, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Krista Marx , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2016

- CF008285

- AXXX

- MB

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and David John McPherrin, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER
, C.J., L EVINE and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Mark D. Meersman, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Transcend Services, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2005;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and34-47986]; 

 

c) evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

d) disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: July 28, 2005
### NUMBER 13 - 14 - 00 299 - CR 

## COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

MARCUS ALLEN BERGH , A ppellant ,
v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, A ppellee

.

On a ppeal from the 24 th District Court of Victoria County, Texas.



## ORDER OF ABATEMENT
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez , and Garza Order Per Curiam Appellant ’ s brief was originally due on August 13, 2014

. Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(b)(2), on August 19, 2014 , the Clerk of the Court notified appellant ’ s counsel that the brief had not been timely filed

. Appellant ’ s counsel filed a motion for extension of time to file the brief until November 7, 2014, which was granted2

by the Court

. The brief was not filed and on November 14, 2014, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant’s counsel that the brief had not been time ly filed . A ppellant ’ s counsel filed a second motion for exte nsion of time to file the brief which was granted by order to file the brief on or before February 2, 2015 . The order notified counsel that no further extensions would be granted absent exigent circumstances. Counsel has nevertheless failed to file an appellate brief in this matter. Accordingly, we now ABATE this appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court for further proceedings pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) and (3) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Upon remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means necessary to make appropriate findings and recommendations concerning the following: (1) whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal; (2) why appellant's counsel has failed to file a brief and whether counsel has effectively abandoned the appeal; (3) whether appellant has been denied effective assistance of counsel; (4) whether appellant's counsel should be removed; and (5) whether appellant is indigent and entitled to court

- appointed counsel. If the trial court determines that appellant does want to continue the appeal, that present counsel should be removed, and that appellant is indigent and entitled to
court
- appointed co unsel, the trial court shall appoint new counsel to represent appellant in this appeal. If new counsel is appointed, the name, address, telephone number, email address, and state bar number of said counsel shall be included in an order appointing counsel. The trial court shall cause its finding s and recommendations, together with any orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues, to be included in a supplemental3

clerk's record. Furthermore, the trial court shall cause a supplemental reporter's r ecord of any proceedings to be prepared. The supplemental clerk's record and supplemental reporter's record, if any, shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before the expiration of thirty days from the date of this order. It is so ORDERED. PER CURIAM
Do not publish T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b)

. Delivered and filed the 18th day of February , 201 5

.
#### § 552.303 Entity.

The term *entity* means a partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization.
HomeAbout UsContact UsLinks

Site MapTopics

Newsroom
Army Earth DayAwards ProgramBookmarksEnvironmental UpdateFact SheetsOutreachPhoto LibraryPress Release ArchivesVideo Newse-mail USAEC-PAO

Subscribe**Submit articles and photos to the*Environmental Update***
**Center Spread List:** — Training and Species Flourish — Restoring the Past — Sustaining the Land — Clean Home, Green Home — Taking Control — FY08 Env. Awards — The Measure of the Land — Perchlorate — Env. Quality Transformation — FY07 Env. Awards — NHPA Game — Best Management Practices — Sustainable Range Program — FY06 Env. Awards — Army Forestry — Underground Tactics — A Fort Ahead — FY05 Env. Awards — Victory Over Hazard — Unlocking NEPA — ACUB — FY04 Env. Awards — Preserving American Heritage — Building Sustainable Machines — Endangered Species — FY03 Env. Awards

The *Environmental Update* is the Command's quarterly publication. It highlights the Army's most innovative environmental practices and successes and is distributed worldwide. Other agency publications describe elements of the Army's environmental practices from regional or program perspectives. Coverage on Soldiers Radio and Television broadcasts the Army environmental message to military installations and more than six hundred commercial media outlets worldwide.
| 2010                    | 2009                   | 2008                   |
|-------------------------|------------------------|------------------------|
| Fall/WinterSummerSpring | FallSummerSpringWinter | FallSummerSpringWinter |
| 2007                    | 2006                   | 2005                   |
| FallSummerSpringWinter  | FallSummerSpringWinter | FallSummerSpringWinter |
| 2004                    | 2003                   | 2002                   |
| FallSummerSpringWinter  | FallSummerSpringWinter | FallSummerSpringWinter |

Last modified on Problems? Suggestions?Administrative Notice
§ 544.204 Expenses of maintaining blocked physical property; liquidation of blocked property. ( a ) Except as otherwise authorized, and notwithstanding the existence of any rights or obligations conferred or imposed by any international agreement or contract entered into or any license or permit granted prior to the effective date, all expenses incident to the maintenance of physical property blocked pursuant to § 544.201(a) shall be the responsibility of the owners or operators of such property, which expenses shall not be met from blocked funds.
( b ) Property blocked pursuant to § 544.201(a) may, in the discretion of the Office of Foreign Assets Control, be sold or liquidated and the net proceeds placed in a blocked interest-bearing account in the name of the owner of the property.
www.gpo.gov

### §202. Congressional finding and declaration of policy

(a) The Congress finds that the existence, in industries engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, of labor conditions detrimental to the maintenance of the minimum standard of living necessary for health, efficiency, and general well-being of workers (1) causes commerce and the channels and instrumentalities of commerce to be used to spread and perpetuate such labor conditions among the workers of the several States; (2) burdens commerce and the free flow of goods in commerce; (3) constitutes an unfair method of competition in commerce; (4) leads to labor disputes burdening and obstructing commerce and the free flow of goods in commerce; and (5) interferes with the orderly and fair marketing of goods in commerce. That Congress further finds that the employment of persons in domestic service in households affects commerce.

(b) It is declared to be the policy of this chapter, through the exercise by Congress of its power to regulate commerce among the several States and with foreign nations, to correct and as rapidly as practicable to eliminate the conditions above referred to in such industries without substantially curtailing employment or earning power.

(June 25, 1938, ch. 676, §2, 52 Stat. 1060; Oct. 26, 1949, ch. 736, §2, 63 Stat. 910; Pub. L. 93–259, §7(a), Apr. 8, 1974, 88 Stat. 62.)

#### Amendments

1974—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 93–259 inserted finding of Congress that employment of persons in domestic service in households affects commerce.

1949—Subsec. (b). Act Oct. 26, 1949, inserted reference to regulation of commerce with foreign nations.

#### Effective Date of 1974 Amendment

Section 29(a) of Pub. L. 93–259 provided that: “Except as otherwise specifically provided, the amendments made by this Act [see Short Title of 1974 Amendment note set out under section 201 of this title] shall take effect on May 1, 1974.”

#### Effective Date of 1949 Amendment

Section 16(a) of act Oct. 26, 1949, provided that: “The amendments made by this Act [enacting section 216b of this title, amending this section and sections 203 to 208, 211 to 216, and 217 of this title, and repealing section 216a of this title] shall take effect upon the expiration of ninety days from the date of its enactment [Oct. 26, 1947]; except that the amendment made by section 4 [amending section 204 of this title] shall take effect on the date of its enactment [Oct. 26, 1949].”

#### Rules, Regulations, and Orders With Regard to Fair Labor Standards Amendments of 1974

Section 29(b) of Pub. L. 93–259 provided that: “Notwithstanding subsection (a) [set out as an Effective Date of 1974 Amendment note above], on and after the date of the enactment of this Act [Apr. 8, 1974] the Secretary of Labor is authorized to prescribe necessary rules, regulations, and orders with regard to the amendments made by this Act [see Short Title of 1974 Amendment note set out under section 201 of this title].”
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Art in Embassies Announces New Temporary Exhibitions for Chief of Mission Residences

# 									Art in Embassies Announces New Temporary Exhibitions for Chief of Mission Residences							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

August 3, 2022

Art in Embassies (AIE) recently completed the installations of three new temporary art exhibitions at Chief of Mission residences in Canada, Poland, and Slovenia. These installations reflect the Ambassadors’ backgrounds and interests and are a vital part of U.S. diplomacy, serving as touchpoints for diplomatic engagement between U.S. representatives and foreign visitors.

Ambassador David L. Cohen’s residential exhibition in Ottawa centers around works from the American Northeast, especially scenes of Philadelphia and Martha’s Vineyard. In Warsaw, Ambassador Brzezinski showcases dance, movement, and diversity in a variety of media and presentation styles, as well as in the age/generation, national origin, sexual orientation, and gender identity of the artists and their subjects. In Ljubljana, Ambassador Harpootlian’s residence features Southern artists whose works of realism and abstraction express the intersection of the natural world, the human spirit, and art.

To learn more about the exhibits, artists, and pieces, please visit:

Ottawa – https://art.state.gov/portfolio/ottawa_2022/

Warsaw – https://art.state.gov/portfolio/warsaw_2022/

Ljubljana – https://art.state.gov/portfolio/ljubljana_2022/

The U.S. Department of State established the Office of Art in Embassies in 1963, adapting a program that began ten years earlier by the Museum of Modern Art. The exhibitions and collections created by AIE play a vital role in our nation’s public diplomacy. The works are carefully selected to reflect the pride and innovation of America’s cultural sector and to make cross cultural connections in the regions and states in which they are displayed. In 2023, AIE will celebrate its 60th anniversary at the U.S. Department of State.

For further information, please contact Camille Benton at BentonSC@state.gov or visit art.state.gov.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonBureau of Overseas Buildings Operations

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000858915
<NAME> CALIFORNIA CULINARY ACADEMY, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                            3383
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2713
<ALLOWANCES>                                       280
<INVENTORY>                                        214
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  6963
<PP&E>                                            8810
<DEPRECIATION>                                    4129
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   12733
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             5976
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        988
<COMMON>                                          9112
<OTHER-SE>                                      (4051)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     12733
<SALES>                                            535
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  3529
<CGS>                                              415
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      702
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  2744
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   6
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     77
<INCOME-TAX>                                        31
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 46
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        46
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.01
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 10.2
 THIS NOTE HAS NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, OR ANY STATE
SECURITIES LAWS. THIS NOTE MAY NOT BE SOLD, OFFERED FOR SALE, PLEDGED OR HYPOTHECATED IN THE
ABSENCE OF AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION STATEMENT AS TO THIS NOTE UNDER SAID ACT AND ANY APPLICABLE
STATE SECURITIES LAWS OR AN OPINION OF COUNSEL REASONABLY SATISFACTORY TO JMAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
THAT SUCH REGISTRATION IS NOT REQUIRED.
 SECURED NON-CONVERTIBLE REVOLVING NOTE
 Parent Exhibit A Company Companies Holder Maturity Date
 Security Agreement
 Note
 ARTICLE I
CONTRACT RATE
 Contract Rate Principal Amount The Wall Street Journal Prime Rate Contract
Rate




---



##### 



Cash Portion of the Contract Rate Cash Interest Portion Repayment Date
 ARTICLE II
ADVANCE INTEREST
 Advance Interest Portion of the Contract Rate Advance Interest Portion Advance Interest Portion Payment Date
  .
 ARTICLE III
EVENTS OF DEFAULT AND DEFAULT RELATED PROVISIONS
 Events of Default Event of Default
 Default Interest
 2




---



##### 



Default Payment Default Payment Default Notice Period
 ARTICLE IV
MISCELLANEOUS
 Cumulative Remedies
 Failure or Indulgence Not Waiver
 Notices th
 Amendment Provision
 3




---



##### 



Assignability
 Cost of Collection
 Governing Law, Jurisdiction and Waiver of Jury Trial
  PROVIDED THAT FURTHER PROVIDED THAT FORUM NON CONVENIENS
 4




---



##### 



Severability
 Maximum Payments
 Security Interest and Guarantee
 Construction
 Registered Obligation 1.871-14(c)(1)(i)
  5




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 JMAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.By:
    
    /s/ Dennis E. ValentineName: Dennis E. ValentineTitle: Chief Financial OfficerWITNESS:/s/ Gary KlementJMAR/SAL NANOLITHOGRAPHY, INC.By:
    
    /s/ Dennis E. ValentineName: Dennis E. ValentineTitle: Chief Financial OfficerWITNESS:/s/ Gary KlementJSI MICROELECTRONICS, INC.By:
    
    /s/ Dennis E. ValentineName: Dennis E. ValentineTitle: Chief Financial OfficerWITNESS:/s/ Gary Klement
 6




---



##### 



JMAR RESEARCH, INC.By:
    
    /s/ Dennis E. ValentineName: Dennis E. ValentineTitle: Chief Financial OfficerWITNESS:/s/ Gary Klement
 7




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
 OTHER COMPANIES
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-50294 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff - Appellee

v. ALLAN HAWLEY Defendant - Appellant

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-93-CR-62-ALL

-------------------- October 1, 2001 Before KING, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and JONES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Allan Hawley appeals the sentence imposed as a result of the revocation of his supervised release. As there is no applicable guideline, we will uphold a sentence for a revocation of supervised release unless it is in violation of law or plainly unreasonable. See United States v. Giddings , 37 F.3d 1091, 1093 (5th Cir. 1994). The 36-month sentence does not exceed the maximum authorized sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3). Contrary to Hawley’s assertions, the entire record indicates that the district courtNo. 01-50294 -2- did consider the relevant sentencing factors in determining the sentence for revocation of Hawley’s supervised release, notwithstanding that the district court also considered that Hawley had breached the trust placed in him by the Government. The sentence is not plainly unreasonable. See United States v. Gonzalez , 250 F.3d 923, 925, 930 (5th Cir. 2001). The sentence is AFFIRMED. Without opposition, the Government seeks to have the appellee’s brief and appellant’s reply brief sealed because they refer to matters contained in sealed portions of the record. Good cause having been shown for the request, the motion is GRANTED. AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
§ 31.6694-1 Section 6694 penalties applicable to tax return preparer. ( a ) *In general.* For general definitions regarding section 6694 penalties applicable to preparers of employment tax returns or claims for refund of employment tax under chapters 21 through 25 of subtitle C of the Internal Revenue Code, see § 1.6694-1 of this chapter.
( b ) *Effective/applicability date.* Paragraph (a) of this section is applicable to returns and claims for refund filed, and advice provided, after December 31, 2008.
[T.D. 9436, 73 FR 78453, Dec. 22, 2008, as amended by T.D. 9436, 74 FR 5105, Jan. 29, 2009]
Z|
;
i

 yeog nas Dpto
mone a mE Com wt Pe men TO aR a a
rms
Loswnar Prey Ais Gc Baum SAAD Me Sate} ore pane mat Pe
oe
Coal baaskstthent tecihrieaseskebeiomrdaereeaiol
a ey ee mo MAR es Contre ee One Remsen Pope
Se wea tat eae tw Her Lemony perm fh rte
(fe CCS Chicad Satace Dagan takin hae Ae Soeeh themgemes Seren

DAL ntAld WEN Lee TER

aseronine weNCArOR MEDIATION

Sede 1280000 en ~
——Smacmsn eee rece - Sette sae. cr
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906****OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of TEPPCO Partners, L.P. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the “Report”),as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,Jerry E. Thompson, President and Chief Executive Officer of Texas EasternProducts Pipeline Company, LLC, the general partner of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ JERRY E. THOMPSON                                          |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Jerry E. Thompson                                              |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer                          |   |
| Texas Eastern Products Pipeline Company, LLC,  General Partner |

 

June 16,2006

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to TEPPCO Partners, L.P. and will be retained by TEPPCO Partners, L.P.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

----