alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 AUGUST 26, 2011

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 ________________________

 No. 10-12936 

 ________________________

 D.C. Docket Nos. 1:09-md-02036-JLK,

1:09-cv-23127-JLK

THOMAS LARSEN,

BRENT LOWE,

JENNIFER PALACIOS,

MARTIN PALACIOS,

ANGELA WALSH-DUFFY,

Plaintiffs - Appellees,

 versus

J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,

Defendant - Appellant.

______________________________

No. 10-12937 

______________________________

D.C. Docket Nos. 1:09-md-02036-JLK,

1:09-cv-23432-JLK

VALERIE WILLIAMS,
MEGAN BISS,

BILLY MARTIN RUIZ,

DEBORAH RUIZ,

JOHN KIRKLAND,

JACQUELINE MILLER,

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs - Appellees,

 versus

J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant.

________________________

 Appeals from the United States District Court

 for the Southern District of Florida

 ________________________

(August 26, 2011)

Before EDMONDSON and MARCUS, Circuit Judges, and LAWSON, District *

Judge.

PER CURIAM:

After the parties filed their appellate briefs in this case, the United States

Supreme Court decided AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 131 S. Ct. 1740

(2011). The district court’s order denying Appellant’s motion to stay the

 Honorable Hugh Lawson, United States District Judge for the Middle District of *

Georgia, sitting by designation.

2
proceedings pending arbitration is VACATED, and this case is fully REMANDED

to the district court. The District Court is to reconsider the case in the light of the

Supreme Court’s Concepcion opinion. In the district court, discovery is to be

limited to issues bearing significantly on the arbitrability of this dispute until the

question of arbitrability has been decided.

VACATED and REMANDED.

3
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2589 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2589

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To extend authorities under the Middle East Peace Facilitation Act of 
         1994 until December 31, 1995, and for other purposes.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2589

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To extend authorities under the Middle East Peace Facilitation Act of 
         1994 until December 31, 1995, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES.

    (a) In General.--Section 583(a) of the Foreign Relations 
Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995 (Public Law 103-236), as 
amended by Public Law 104-30, is amended by striking ``November 1, 
1995'' and inserting ``December 31, 1995''.
    (b) Consultation.--For purposes of any exercise of the authority 
provided in section 583(a) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, 
Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995 (Public Law 103-236) prior to November 14, 
1995, the written policy justification dated June 1, 1995, and 
submitted to the Congress in accordance with section 583(b)(1) of such 
Act, and the consultations associated with such policy justification, 
shall be deemed to satisfy the requirements of section 583(b)(1) of 
such Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 7, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
§ 535.216 Prohibition against prosecution of certain claims. ( a ) Persons subject to the jurisdiction of the United States are prohibited from prosecuting in any court within the United States or elsewhere, whether or not litigation was commenced before or after January 19, 1981, any claim against the Government of Iran arising out of events occurring before January 19, 1981 relating to: ( 1 ) The seizure of the hostages on November 4, 1979;
( 2 ) The subsequent detention of such hostages;
( 3 ) Injury to United States property or property of United States nationals within the United States Embassy compound in Tehran after November 3, 1979; or
( 4 ) Injury to United States nationals or their property as a result of popular movements in the course of the Islamic Revolution in Iran which were not an act of the Government of Iran.
( b ) Any persons who are not United States nationals are prohibited from prosecuting any claim described in paragraph (a) of this section in any court within the United States.
( c ) No further action, measure or process shall be taken after the effective date of this section in any judicial proceeding instituted before the effective date of this section which is based upon any claim described in paragraph (a) of this section, and all such proceedings shall be terminated.
( d ) No judicial order issued in the course of the proceedings described in paragraph (c) of this section shall be enforced in any way.
(Secs. 201-207, 91 Stat. 1626, 50 U.S.C. 1701-1706; E.O. 12170, 44 FR 65729; E.O. 12205, 45 FR 24099; E.O. 12211, 45 FR 26685; E.O. 12276, 46 FR 7913; E.O. 12279, 46 FR 7919; E.O. 12280, 46 FR 7921; E.O. 12281, 46 FR 7923; E.O. 12282, 46 FR 7925; E.O. 12283, 46 FR 7927, and E.O. 12294, 46 FR 14111)
[46 FR 14334, Feb. 26, 1981]
§ 49.4253-4 Exemption for servicemen in combat zone. ( a ) *In general.* The exemption provided by section 4253(d) is applicable to any payment received for any telephone or radio telephone message or call which originates within a combat zone, as defined in section 112, from a member of the Armed Forces of the United States performing service in such combat zone, if a properly executed certificate of exemption substantially in the form shown in paragraph (c) of this section is furnished to the person receiving such payment.
( b ) *Service in combat zone.* Service is performed in a combat zone only if it is performed in an area which the President of the United States has designated by Executive order, for the purpose of section 112, as an area in which Armed Forces of the United States are or have engaged in combat, and only if it is performed on or after the date designated by the President by Executive order as the date of the commencing of combatant activities in such zone and on or before the date designated by the President by Executive order as the date of the termination of combatant activities in such zone.
( c ) *Exemption certificate.* ( 1 ) The exemption certificate shall be in substantially the following form: Exemption Certificate (Overseas Telephone Calls) (Date) ____________________________ 19____ I certify that the toll charges of $__________ are for telephone or radio telephone messages originating at __________________________ (Point of origin) within a combat zone from (Name) a member of the Armed Forces of the United States performing service in such combat zone; that the transmission facilities were furnished by ____________________ (Name of carrier); and that the charges are exempt from tax under section 4253(d) of the Internal Revenue Code. (Signature of subscriber) (Address) Note:
Penalty for fraudulent use, $10,000 or imprisonment or both.
( 2 ) See § 49.4253-11 for further provisions relating to exemption certificates.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 306.22 Exchange of Treasury Bonds, Investment Series B-1975-80. Bonds of this series presented for exchange for 11 ⁄ 2 percent 5-year Treasury notes must bear duly executed assignments to “The Secretary of the Treasury for exchange for the current series of EA or EO Treasury notes to be delivered to (inserting the name and address of the person to whom the notes are to be delivered).” The notes will bear the April 1 or October 1 date next preceding the date the bonds, duly assigned with supporting evidence, if necessary, are received by the Bureau or a Federal Reserve Bank or Branch. Interest accrued at the rate of 23 ⁄ 4 percent on the bonds surrendered from the next preceding interest payment date to the date of exchange will be credited, and interest at the rate of 11 ⁄ 2 percent on the notes for the same period will be charged and the difference will be paid to the owner.
#### Porter L. Wood *vs.*Patrick Kenney.

Third Judicial District, New Haven,

January Term, 1926.

Wheeler, C. J., Curtis, Maltbie, Haines and Hinman, Js.

Argued January 20th

decided March 4th, 1926.

Action to recover damages for injuries to person and property from the alleged negligence of defendant in the operation of his automobile, brought to the Superior Court in New Haven County and tried to the jury before *Booth, J.;*verdict for defendant, and appeal by plaintiff.

*No error.*

*Porter L. Wood, pro se,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

*Walter J. Walsh,*for the appellee (defendant).

Per Curiam.

The error assigned in failing to correct the finding in accordance with exceptions one and two cannot be considered, since the appellant has not com*739plied with the requirements of our procedure. See General Statutes, §§ 5830, 5831; Rules of Supreme Court of Errors, § 11 (Practice Book, p. 309).

The fourth error assigned in denying the plaintiff’s motion in arrest is based upon the claimed misconduct of a juror. The finding of facts discloses that there was no misconduct of the juror, that the claimed misconduct was too trivial for consideration, that the act alleged was not occasioned by the prevailing party or anyone in his behalf, and that it did not unfavorably prejudice the appellant. *State*v. *Rubuka,*82 Conn. 59, 61, 72 Atl. 566; *Pettibone*v. *Phelps,*13 Conn. 444; *Wood*v. *Holah,*80 Conn. 314, 316, 68 Atl. 323. Under such circumstances the trial court could not have legally sustained the motion in arrest.

There is no error.
STATE OF MICHIGAN JENNIFER M
. GRANHOLM OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR JOHN D
. CHERRY, JR. GOVERNOR LT. GOVERNOR LANSING July 1, 2009

Mr. Bharat Mathur, Acting Regional Administrator United States Environmental ProtectionAgency Region 5 77 WestJackson Boulevard (R-19J) Chicago, IL 60604-3590 Dear Mr. Mathur: Based on assessment data provided by the Michigan Department ofEnvironmental Quality (MDEQ), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) is currently evaluatingthe St. Clair Shores Drain site in Macomb County (U.S. EPA ID: MIN000510063) for potentialinclusion on the National Priorities List (NPL). The state of Michigan hereby supports the inclusion ofthe St. Clair Shores Drain site in the next proposed NPL update. This site has been the subject ofa U.S. EPAEmergencyRemoval Action; however, considerable polychlorinated biphenyl contamination still exists atthe site and this contamination has migrated into the surface waters ofLake St. Clair and some connecting canals. A healthconsultation performed by the Michigan Department ofCommunity Healthhas determined thatthe site poses a public health hazard. A federally-funded site assessment has been completed by the MDEQ and submitted to the U.S. EPA. The site assessment concludes that this site poses a significant threat to public health and the environment and is eligible to be placed on the NPL. Placingthe site on the NPL is currently the most viable alternative for addressingthe necessary long-term response actions. Thankyou for your consideration, and please continue to coordinate your agency's activities with the MDEQ.

JMG/pd

PO. BOX 30013 • LANSING
. MICHIGAN 48909 www.michigan
.gov

### Mr. 

### Bharat Mathur 2 July 1, 2009

c: Mr. StevenE. Chester, Director, MDEQ Mr. Jim Sygo, Deputy Director, MDEQ Ms. Carol Linteau, Legislative Director, MDEQ Ms. JoAnn Merrick, Chief of Staff, MDEQ Ms. Lynelle Marolf, MDEQ Mr. 

### David Kline, MDEQ Mr. 

### Joseph, Walczak, MDEQ
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 34

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲

▲

▲ 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

05/31

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 31 May 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.77 N 77.11 W Meters AGL
#### § 35.25 Exemptive relief.

The Department of the Treasury may grant exemptions or waivers from some or all of the restrictions on share buybacks and dividend payments under this part if such exemption or waiver is necessary or appropriate to effectuate the goals of the ECIP or to protect the public interest. Such exemptions or waivers may be subject to such terms and conditions as deemed necessary or appropriate by the Department of the Treasury.
#### § 1023.315 Exemptions.

Refer to § 1010.315 of this chapter for exemptions from the obligation to file reports of transactions in currency for brokers or dealers in securities.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Assistant Secretary Nichols’ Travel to Argentina

# 									Assistant Secretary Nichols’ Travel to Argentina							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

February 2, 2024

Assistant Secretary of State for the Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs Brian A. Nichols will travel to Buenos Aires, Argentina, from February 4 to 6.  Assistant Secretary Nichols will meet with senior government officials, including President Javier Milei, Foreign Minister Diana Mondino, Security Minister Patricia Bullrich, and Economy Minister Luis Caputo, to discuss regional and global challenges, economic stabilization, and other areas of mutual interest. Assistant Secretary Nichols will also meet with private sector representatives to explore opportunities for new U.S. investments in Argentina that will enhance inclusive prosperity in both countries.  Lastly, the Assistant Secretary will meet with civil society, including union leaders, and U.S.-sponsored program alumni working to advance human rights in Argentina.

For further information, please contact WHAPress@state.gov, and follow @WHAAsstSecty on Twitter.

Tags

ArgentinaBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial International Travel

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 321.27 Instructions and guidance. ( a ) The Bureau of the Fiscal Service will provide Federal Reserve Processing Sites, TRS Sites, and paying agents with instructions and guidance on how to process redemption transactions. This information is available online at the Bureau of the Fiscal Service's Web site at *www.treasurydirect.gov*, Federal Reserve Processing Sites, and TRS Sites. Paying agents must follow these instructions and guidance.
( b ) The Federal Reserve Operating Circular sets forth additional rights and obligations of paying agents with respect to redemption transactions. Additional instructions and guidance are available online at the Federal Reserve Bank Services Web site at *www.FRBservices.org .*
( c ) Paying agents are required to process redemptions in accordance with the terms and conditions cited in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section. The Secretary of the Treasury, or a designee, reserves the right to hold an agent liable whose failure to follow these instructions results in an incorrect amount being paid for a redeemed security.
[77 FR 16167, Mar. 20, 2012]
HomeDiplomatic Security Service Memorial...Fouad  Abdou

# 				Fouad  Abdou			

				Local Guard Force			

Deceased				September 20, 1984			

**U.S. Government image**Back to DSS Memorial

Tags

Diplomatic Security Service MemorialLebanon

Back to Top
Ablited @ Weateepen, BC

US CEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

JRARONAL OCEANIC AND ATMCHNEME ADMINETRATION
ATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE

MATHML COCR wUTERERL A 1) AME TERS AS AAR DEH
SPeRMRMRY TTS WY 2 SEEN AneTVAGS
#### § 50.96 Insurer responsibility.

Notwithstanding § 50.4(o), for purposes of the collection, reporting and remittance of Federal terrorism policy surcharges to Treasury, the definition of insurer shall not include any affiliate of the insurer.
§ 19.905 Affiliate. Persons are *affiliates* of each other if, directly or indirectly, either one controls or has the power to control the other or a third person controls or has the power to control both. The ways we use to determine control include, but are not limited to— ( a ) Interlocking management or ownership;
( b ) Identity of interests among family members;
( c ) Shared facilities and equipment;
( d ) Common use of employees; or
( e ) A business entity which has been organized following the exclusion of a person which has the same or similar management, ownership, or principal employees as the excluded person.
§ 542.529 Policy on activities related to petroleum and petroleum products of Syrian origin for the benefit of the National Coalition of Syrian Revolutionary and Opposition Forces. ( a ) Specific licenses may be issued on a case-by-case basis to authorize U.S. persons to engage in any transaction otherwise prohibited by § 542.206, § 542.207, § 542.208, § 542.209, or § 542.210, including but not limited to new investment, involving the purchase, trade, export, import, or production of petroleum or petroleum products of Syrian origin for the benefit of the National Coalition of Syrian Revolutionary and Opposition Forces.
( b ) Specific licenses issued pursuant to this policy will not authorize any transaction or activity, directly or indirectly, with the Government of Syria or any other person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 542.201(a).
§ 551.405 Provision of services. ( a ) The prohibitions on transactions contained in § 551.201 apply to services performed in the United States or by U.S. persons, wherever located, including by a foreign branch of an entity located in the United States: ( 1 ) On behalf of or for the benefit of a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 551.201; or
( 2 ) With respect to property interests of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 551.201.
( b ) For example, U.S. persons may not, except as authorized by or pursuant to this part, provide legal, accounting, financial, brokering, freight forwarding, transportation, public relations, or other services to a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 551.201.
Note 1 to § 551.405 .
*See* §§ 551.507 and 551.509 on licensing policy with regard to the provision of certain legal and emergency medical services.
DETERMINATION AS TO DOWER..

Court of Appeals for Wood County

#### Samuel H. Pelton v. Edwin Smith et al.

Decided, October 24, 1912.

*Action to Fix Dower Appealable*— Mortgages *Existing Prior to Coverture Payable Before Dower is Determined.*

1. An action to determine whether plaintiff is entitled to dower in the entire proceeds from the sale, or only in the surplus after satisfying a mortgage lien, is appealable.

2. Where a mortgage was placed on the premises prior to the marriage of the plaintiff to the mortgagor, the mortgagor at no time during coverture had more than an equity of redemption in the property, and the plaintiff is therefore dowable only out of the surplus after satisfaction of the mortgage.

*Benj. F. James,*for plaintiff.

*R. D. Mooré,*e'ontfa.

*272Richards, J.

In the court of common pleas, Samuel IT. Pelton brought an action for the purpose of obtaining an assignment of dower claimed by him in a tract of land containing forty acres in this county. On the trial a decree was entered adjudging the plaintiff to be entitled to dower, but only in the surplus remaining after a certain mortgage was satisfied. From that decree the plaintiff prosecuted both error and appeal, claiming that he was entitled to dower in the entire proceeds of sale without abatement therefrom.

Under authority of *Corry*v. *Lamb,*43 O. S., 390, we hold that the case is appealable, and therefore case No. 950 will be dismissed and the question determined in the appeal case, No. 952.

It appears from the record in the ease that the plaintiff intermarried with one Mary D. Smith about August 12th, 1908, and remained her husband until the date of her death, June 30th, 1912. At the time they were married a mortgage given by her was held by the Mutual Benefit Insurance Company of New Jersey, covering the premises in which plaintiff seeks dower. In. this case, by proper decree entered in the court of common pleas, the premises have been sold and the amount found due upon the mortgage determined, that amount being some $1,558. The purchase price of the land on sale made by the sheriff amounts to the sum of $4,000.

In view of the fact that, the mortg’age was on the premises at the time the plaintiff was united in marriage with the mortgagor, she had at no time during coverture more than an equity of redemption in the property, and he therefore could only be dowable out of the surplus after the satisfaction of the mortgage. The principle enunciated in *Nichols*v. *French, Admr.,*83 O. S., 162, is applicable and controlling in the case at bar, and decree may be entered finding the plaintiff entitled to dower in the surplus remaining after the satisfaction of the mortgage indebtedness.

Wildman, J., and Kinkade., J.-, eon'cur.
AMENDMENT TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


     This Amendment (the "Amendment") is made and entered into as of the 31st
day of March, 1998 by and between WorldPort Communications, Inc., a Delaware
corporation ("WorldPort" or the "Company") and Mr. Phillip S. Magiera 
("Executive") and amends that certain Employment Agreement dated as of January
1, 1998 between the Company and Executive (the "Employment Agreement").

     WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend Section 6(f) of the Employment
Agreement;

     WHEREAS, all capitalized terms used by not defined herein shall have the
meanings given in the Employment Agreement;

     NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as
follows:

     1.   Section 6(f) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended and
restated to read in its entirety as follows:

          "(f)  The Company shall issue to the Executive an aggregate of 500,000
        shares (the "Shares") of the Company's Common Stock, par value $.0001
        per share, in exchange for $1.33 per share.  The Executive shall pay
        $50,000 of the purchase price to the Company in cash and the remaining
        $615,000 shall be paid to the Company by delivery by the Executive of a
        promissory note.  The promissory note shall accrue interest at an annual
        rate of 11%, mature on January 1, 2000 and provide for monthly payments
        of principal and accrued interest.  The promissory note shall be secured
        by a pledge to the Company of the Shares purchased by the Executive
        hereby."

     2.   Except as otherwise amended hereby, all terms and provisions of the
Employment Agreement shall continue in full force and effect as stated therein.


     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day
and year first above written.

                                   WORLDPORT COMMUNICATIONS, INC.


                                   By: 
                                   Name: 
                                   Title: 




                                   Phillip S. Magiera
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

###### Editorial Note on Part 360

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 360 appear at 79 FR 8860, Feb. 14, 2014.

#### § 360.62 Payment to minor.

If the owner of a savings bond is a minor and the form of registration does not indicate that there is a representative of the minor's estate, payment will be made to the minor upon his or her request, provided the minor is of sufficient competency to sign the request for payment and to understand the nature of the transaction. In general, the fact that the request for payment has been signed by a minor and certified will be accepted as sufficient proof of competency and understanding.