alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1363 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1363

  To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to deny citizenship at 
  birth to children born in the United States of parents who are not 
                 citizens or permanent resident aliens.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 30, 1995

Mr. Bilbray (for himself, Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Packard, Mr. Hunter, Mr. 
  Doolittle, Mrs. Roukema, Mr. Stenholm, Mr. Baker of California, Mr. 
 Calvert, Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut, Mr. Murtha, Mr. Traficant, Mr. 
Hayes, Mr. Bono, Mr. McKeon, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. Riggs, Mr. Horn, Mrs. 
Seastrand, Mr. Shadegg, and Mrs. Kelly) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to deny citizenship at 
  birth to children born in the United States of parents who are not 
                 citizens or permanent resident aliens.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Citizenship Reform Act of 1995''.

SEC. 2. PURPOSE.

    It is the purpose of this Act to deny automatic citizenship at 
birth to children born in the United States to parents who are not 
citizens or permanent resident aliens.

SEC. 3. CITIZENSHIP AT BIRTH FOR CHILDREN OF NON-CITIZEN, NON-PERMANENT 
              RESIDENT ALIENS.

    (a) In General.--Section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act 
(8 U.S.C. 1101) is amended by inserting after subsection (c) the 
following new subsection:
    ``(d) For purposes of section 301(a), a person born in the United 
States shall be considered as `subject to the jurisdiction of the 
United States' if--
            ``(1) the child was born in wedlock in the United States to 
        a parent either of whom is (A) a citizen or national of the 
        United States, or (B) an alien who is lawfully admitted for 
        permanent residence and maintains his or her residence (as 
        defined in subsection (a)(33)) in the United States; or
            ``(2) the child was born out of wedlock in the United 
        States to a mother who is (A) a citizen or national of the 
        United States, or (B) an alien who is lawfully admitted for 
        permanent residence and maintains her residence in the United 
        States.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 301 of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1401) 
is amended by inserting ``(as defined in section 101(d))'' after 
``subject to the jurisdiction thereof''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to aliens born on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 544.407 Payments from blocked accounts to satisfy obligations prohibited.

Pursuant to § 544.201, no debits may be made to a blocked account to pay obligations to U.S. persons or other persons, except as authorized by or pursuant to this part.
#### § 550.305 [Reserved]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6042

HENRY ERIC HAMILTON; CHESTER JAMES DOLES,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

SIMON WAINWRIGHT, Captain, in official and individual capacities; JUDY SMITH, Sergeant, in

official and individual capacities,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

S. MOCK, Hearing Officer,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-95-

1240-AMD)

Submitted: May 15, 1997 Decided: May 29, 1997

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Henry Eric Hamilton, Chester James Doles, Appellants Pro Se. John

Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Audrey J. S. Carrion, Glenn

T. Marrow, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore,

Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the district court's order denying relief on

their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Hamilton v. Wainwright, No. CA-95-1240-AMD (D. Md. Nov. 27, 1996).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# 440890

VENEER SHEETS AND SHEETS FOR PLYWOOD, ETC. WHETHER OR NOT PLANED, ETC., NOT OVER 6 MM (.236 IN.) THICK, OF NONCONIFEROUS WOOD, NESOI 440810 VENEER SHEETS AND SHEETS FOR PLYWOOD, ETC. WHETHER OR NOT PLANED, ETC., NOT OVER 6 MM (.236 IN.) THICK, OF CONIFEROUS WOOD 440839 VENEER SHEETS AND SHEETS FOR PLYWOOD AND OTHER WOOD SAWN LENGTHWISE, SLICED OR PEELED, THICKNESS NOT OVER 6 MM, OTHER TROPICAL WOOD, NESOI 440831 VENEER SHEETS AND SHEETS FOR PLYWOOD AND OTHER WOOD SAWN LENGTHWISE, SLICED OR PEELED, THICKNESS NOT EXCEEDING 6 MM,DARK/LIGHT MERANTI & MERANTI BAKAU **Total**

440890 440839 440831 **Total** 

# HTS - 4408: VENEER SHEETS AND SHEETS FOR PLYWOOD AND OTHER WOOD SAWN LENGTHWISE, SLICED OR PEELED, NOT MORE THAN 6 MM (.236 IN.) THICK

**HTS Number**

Sources: Data on this site have been compiled from tariff and trade data from the U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission.440890 VENEER SHEETS AND SHEETS FOR PLYWOOD, ETC. W HETHER OR NOT PLANED, ETC., NOT OVER 6 MM (.236 IN.) THICK, OF NONCONIFEROUS W OOD, NESOI 440839 VENEER SHEETS AND SHEETS FOR PLYWOOD AND OTHER W OOD SAW N LENGTHW ISE, SLICED OR PEELED, THICKNESS NOT OVER 6 MM, OTHER TROPICAL WOOD, NESOI 440831 VENEER SHEETS AND SHEETS FOR PLYWOOD AND OTHER W OOD SAW N LENGTHW ISE, SLICED OR PEELED, THICKNESS NOT EXCEEDING 6 MM,DARK/LIGHT MERANTI & MERANTI BAKAU **Subtotal square meters** 

## Quantity in square feet **Quantity (1,000's) in square feet HTS Number**  First Unit of Quantity where quantities are collected in square meters

# 2007 **In 1,000 Dollars**



# 476,115

$297,120 $48,032 $312 **$345,464** 

# HTS - 4408: VENEER SHEETS AND SHEETS FOR PLYWOOD AND OTHER WOOD SAWN LENGTHWISE, SLICED OR PEELED, NOT MORE THAN 6 MM (.236 IN.) THICK **Customs Value by Customs Value for ALL Countries**  **U.S. Imports for Consumption Annual Data** 
297,120 130,650 48,032 312

Sources: Data on this site have been compiled from tariff and trade data from the U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission.**2007**

200,168,740 

## 656,721,589 656,722 **In Actual Units of Quantity** 164,952,258 26,978 35,189,504

# HTS - 4408: VENEER SHEETS AND SHEETS FOR PLYWOOD AND OTHER WOOD SAWN LENGTHWISE, SLICED OR PEELED, NOT MORE THAN 6 MM (.236 IN.) THICK**2008 2009**  **2010 2010 YTD**  **2011 YTD Percent**  **Change YTD2010 -**  **YTD2011**

142,944,319 86,818,943 89,264,069 7,039,426 6,420,570 -8.80% 

## In Actual Units of Quantity 115,601,989 72,867,346 71,739,364 5,959,445 5,185,652 -13.00% 14.30% 70,621 2,689 108,580 0 0 N/A 27,271,709 13,948,908 17,416,125 1,079,981 1,234,918
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1311

To provide for a review of all Federal programs that assess or mitigate

the risks to women’s health from environmental exposures, and for a

study of the research needs of the Federal Government relating to

such risks.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 23, 1995

Ms. SLAUGHTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Science, for

a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for

consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To provide for a review of all Federal programs that assess

or mitigate the risks to women’s health from environmental exposures, and for a study of the research needs

of the Federal Government relating to such risks.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Risk Assess5 ment in Women’s Health Act of 1995’’.
2

•HR 1311 IH

1 SEC. 2. INTERAGENCY REVIEW.

2 The Office of Science and Technology Policy, through

3 the Federal Coordinating Council for Science, Engineer4 ing, and Technology, and in consultation with the Office

5 of Research on Women’s Health of the National Institutes

6 of Health, shall conduct a review of all Federal programs

7 that assess or mitigate the risks to women’s health from

8 environmental exposures, including programs setting

9 standards for exposure to various pollutants, toxic sub10 stances, pesticide use, and pesticide residues. The results

11 of such review, including recommendations for ensuring

12 that women’s health needs are addressed by Federal pro13 grams and policies, shall be transmitted to the Congress

14 within 6 months after the date of enactment of this Act.

15 SEC. 3. STUDY OF RESEARCH NEEDS.

16 The National Institute of Environmental Health

17 Sciences shall enter into a contract with the National Re18 search Council of the National Academy of Sciences for

19 the carrying out by such Council, in consultation with the

20 Office of Research on Women’s Health of the National

21 Institutes of Health, for a study to determine the status

22 of the science base and needs of the Federal Government

23 for research relating to the risks to women’s health from

24 environmental exposures, for the purpose of assessing and

25 mitigating such risks. The results of such study shall be
3

•HR 1311 IH

1 transmitted to the Congress within one year after the date

2 of enactment of this Act.

Æ
In the Matter of: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENTOF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC Served: March 1, 2012 FAADocketNo. (TO BE ASSIGNED) FDMS No. FAA 2011-1109 Administrative Law Judge: J. E. Sullivan QUENTON T. BROWN

NOTICE OF PROPOSED MOTION TO RESOLVE CASE COMES NOW the Complainant in this matter, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), by and through its Regional Counsel for the Central Region, and pursuantto Order Granting Motion to Deem Allegations Admitted and Granting Other Relief, issued by Administrative Law Judge J.E. SullivanonFebruary 2, 2012, hereby gives notice that the undersigned intends to file a Motion for Default Judgment onMarch 1, 2012, for the purpose ofresolving this case. Datedthis 29th day ofFebruary 2012. Respectfully submitted, 

### A. LesterHaizlip R gi nal

## Couns;J-<~ ....

## ~**·~jLf** 

# /

# ~v~~ 

# 1 1

# ~:i~rGE~:~:~nt Attorney

. Federal Aviation Administration 901 Locust Street, Room 506 Kansas City, MO 64106 (816) 329-3765; Fax (816) 329-3771 ATTORNEY FOR COMPLAINANT 

# RECEIVED

_ MAR -7 

# 2012 

# HEARING DOCKETQuenton T. Brown FDMS No. FAA 2011-1109

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have this date placed inthe United States mail, postage prepaid, a copy of NOTICE OF PROPOSED MOTION TO RESOLVE CASE addressed to: Quenton T. Brown 2440 Woodwind Trail MelboUine, FL 32953 Quenton T. Brown 622 W. Miller St.l'eet Orlando, Florida 32805-4502 I hereby certify that I have this date provided a copy, viafacsimile transmission, and placed inthe United States mail, postage prepaid, a copy, addressed to: The Honorable J. E. Sullivan Administrative LawJudge U.S. Department ofTransportation Office ofHearings, M-20 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, DC 20590 FAX: (202) 366-7536 I hereby certify that I have this date placedinthe United States mail, postage prepaid, the original and 1 copy addressed to: Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 ATTN: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building, Suite 2Wl000 Dated this 29th day ofFebruary 2012. 

# /

# 1/l!!lfi:-Pc:Z~' !JarkCamacho

- 

# 1 enior EnforcementAttorney
#### Alfred B. Dixon *vs.*Helena M. Gallon.

Third Judicial District, Bridgeport,

April Term, 1926.

Wheeler, C. J., Curtis, Maltbie, Haines and Hinman, Js.

Argued April 14th

decided May 7th, 1926.

Action by a building contractor to recover the value of extra labor and materials, alleged to have been furnished by him, at the request of the defendant, during the construction of a house for the defendant, brought to the Superior Court in New Haven County and tried to the jury before *Nickerson, J.;*verdict and judgment for the plaintiff for $1,195, and appeal by the defendant.

*Appeal dismissed.*

*Robert J. Woodruff,*for the appellant (defendant).

*James C. Shannon,*for the appellee (plaintiff).

*741Per Curiam.

The errors assigned in the appeal are from rulings on evidence and from the charge as made. Since neither appellant, nor appellee, filed a statement of what each offered evidence to prove and claimed to have proved, the trial court should have either required the parties to comply with the rules, or have refused to make a finding. It is impossible for us to pass upon either the rulings on evidence or the parts of the charge complained of without having before us a statement of the facts which each party claimed to have proved and offered evidence to prove.

The appeal is dismissed.
SFD Q1 FY13 EX 10.1




Exhibit 10.1


Certain Compensation for Named Executive Officers 
for Fiscal 2013




	
						
	Name
	Principal Position
	Annual Base Salary
	Annual Cash Incentive(1)

	C. Larry Pope
	President and Chief Executive Officer
	$
	1,100,000
	

	(2)

	Robert W. Manly, IV
	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	$
	750,000
	

	(3)

	George H. Richter
	President and Chief Operating Officer, Pork Group
	$
	800,000
	

	(4)

	Joseph B. Sebring
	President of John Morrell
	$
	735,000
	

	(5)

	Joseph W. Luter, IV
	Executive Vice President, Sales and Marketing, Pork Group
	$
	700,000
	

	(6)




_________


		
	(1)
	For the annual cash incentive awards, “pre-tax profits” are generally defined as net income before deduction for income taxes and incentive payments to key employees.




		
	(2)
	The annual cash incentive formula for Mr. Pope is equal to 1% of Company pre-tax profits subject to a cap of $8 million.




		
	(3)
	The annual cash incentive formula for Mr. Manly is equal to 0.50% of Company pre-tax profits subject to a cap of $4 million.




		
	(4)
	The annual cash incentive formula for Mr. Richter is equal to 0.50% of Pork Group pre-tax profits subject to a cap of $4 million.




		
	(5)
	The annual cash incentive formula for Mr. Sebring is equal to 0.25% of Pork Group pre-tax profits subject to a cap of $2.94 million.




(6)    The annual cash incentive formula for Mr. Luter, IV is equal to:
    
		
	•
	0.13% of the Pork Group pre-tax profits, plus 


		
	•
	0.5% of the International Group pre-tax profits, all subject to a cap of $2.8 million.
HomeDiplomatic Security Service Memorial...Curtis Lee  Hundley

# 				 Curtis Lee  Hundley			

				Third-Party Contractor			

Deceased				April 21, 2005			

**DS Public Affairs has been unable to locate the source of this image to seek permission for its use. Please contact DS Public Affairs (dspublicaffairs@state.gov) if you have additional information.**Back to DSS Memorial

Tags

Diplomatic Security Service MemorialIraq

Back to Top
NO. 

## casual 

# \iai\<\Q<t Aonlt) § INTHETEXAS^SBSiVEDJN PETITIONER § CRIMINALAPPIEALS VS. § OF 

## °EC 112015 

## THE STATE OFTEXAS, § &belAcosta, Clerk RESPONDENT § CRIMINAL APPEALS MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PDR TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS: Comes now, vi^KXXACr. />QALS
. Petitioner, and files this motion for an extension of sixty (60) days in which to file a Petition for Discretionary Review. In support ofthis motion, Petitioner shows the Court the following: 

### I. , The Petitioner was convicted in the "75 District Court of L ib fc/Rl ~7 

# County, Texas ofthe offense of flftftgviMfrU.a flpWbfc^f in Cause No. ORlA^V
.styledTheStateofTexasvs. YfcflfrAC.*. >oAL^ The Petitioner appealedto the CourtofAppeals, Supreme Judicial District, 4fiPp^l5JQ

# Q^^'DOO^X't^
. The case was COafiffief^R|MIN4^ppEALS l^fc^W l^lPVf? • DEC 112315 II. 

## The present deadline for filing the Petition for Discretionary6RVvllw' S^k 

## ffi<ft.^w£\HjffiV The Petitionerhas notrequested anyextensionpriorto this request. III. Petitioner's request for an extension is based upon the following facts: Petitioner was not informed of the decision of the Court of Appeals in affirming his case until 

## ^(rt, 10 jy-0\t>. Since that time Petitioner has been attempting to gain legal representation in this matter. His attorney on the appeal,



### •Sft-JtA U3&lLf\L- , hasinformed Petitioner that hewill not representhim
on the Petition for Discretionary Review.WHEREFORE, Petitioner prays this Court grant this motion and extend the deadhne for filing the Petition for Discretionary Review in Cause No. 

# (A^\\?i\ to i^n\io6. Respectfully submitted, 

### \<jAAACL Ao/116? Petitioner Pro Se TDCJ# Texas Department ofCriminal JusticeCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

### I, [iKflAt^L. X°^\^ , do hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing Motion for Extension of Time to File a Petition for Discretionary Review, has been forwarded by United States Mail, postage prepaid, first class, to the State Prosecuting Attorney, P. O. Box 12405, Austin, TX 78711, and the District 

## Attorney for UiWl^W County, this the "Dlo^W, \ day of on 20$2_.



### \M<Kf\C$ \<?(\&P Petitioner Pro Se
#### § 542.312 Knowingly.

The term *knowingly,* as used in § 542.201(a)(11) through (13), with respect to conduct, a circumstance, or a result, means that a person has actual knowledge, or should have known, of the conduct, the circumstance, or the result.

[89 FR 48318, June 6, 2024]
Docket No: FAA - 2015 - 3985 Dir ID: 2014 - NM - 182 - AD
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 162 (Monday, August 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 42686]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20325]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[WY-923-1310-FI; WYW144809]


Wyoming: Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and 
Gas Lease

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of proposed reinstatement of terminated oil and gas 
lease

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 
3108.2-3(a) and (b)(2), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a 
petition for reinstatement from Anadarko Petroleum Corporation and 
Lance Oil & Gas Company for noncompetitive oil and gas lease WYW144809 
for land in Johnson County, Wyoming. The petition was filed on time and 
was accompanied by all the rentals due since the date the lease 
terminated under the law.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, Carmen E. 
Lovett, Land Law Examiner, at (307) 775-6160.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The lessees have agreed to the amended lease 
terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10.00 per acre or fraction 
thereof, per year and 18\2/3\ percent, respectively. The lessees have 
paid the required $500 administrative fee and $163 to reimburse the 
Department for the cost of this Federal Register notice. The lessees 
have met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out 
in Sections 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 
U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to 
reinstate lease WYW144809 effective April 1, 2009, under the original 
terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty 
rates cited above. BLM has not issued a valid lease affecting the 
lands.

Carmen E. Lovett,
Land Law Examiner.
[FR Doc. E9-20325 Filed 8-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
HomeBiographies...Cornell Chasten, Jr.

# 				Cornell Chasten, Jr.			

															Deputy Assistant Secretary and Assistant Director of the Diplomatic Security Service for International Programs						Bureau of Diplomatic Security												

				December 16, 2020 -									Present							

Tags

Bureau of Diplomatic SecurityState Department Official

Back to Top
Counterpart for Additional Guarantors



 Exhibit 10.1 
 COUNTERPART FOR ADDITIONAL GUARANTORS 
 This COUNTERPART (this
“Counterpart”), dated August 16, 2012, is delivered pursuant to Section 16 of the Guaranty referred to below. The undersigned hereby agrees that this Counterpart may be attached to the Guaranty, dated as of July 17,
2006 (as it may be from time to time amended, modified or supplemented, the “Guaranty”; capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed therein), among the Guarantors named therein and
Wilmington Trust, National Association, as successor-in-interest to The Bank of New York Mellon as Collateral Agent, as Guarantied Party. The undersigned, by executing and delivering this Counterpart, hereby becomes an Additional Guarantor under the
Guaranty in accordance with Section 16 thereof and agrees to be bound by all of the terms thereof. 
 IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Counterpart to be duly executed and delivered by its officer thereunto duly authorized as of August 16, 2012. 

 

			
	NextWave Holdco LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Francis J. Harding

	Title:	 	 Francis J. Harding,
Treasurer



 
			
	Address:	 	12264 El Camino Road, Ste. 305
		 	San Diego, California 92130
		 	Facsimile: 858-704-7825
		 	Attention: Frank Cassou, Esq.


 
			
	
	NextWave Metropolitan Inc.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Francis J. Harding

	Title:	 	 Francis J. Harding,
President



 
			
	Address:	 	12264 El Camino Road, Ste. 305
		 	San Diego, California 92130
		 	Facsimile: 858-704-7825
		 	Attention: Frank Cassou, Esq.