alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 544.101 Relation of this part to other laws and regulations. This part is separate from, and independent of, the other parts of this chapter, with the exception of part 501 of this chapter, the recordkeeping and reporting requirements and license application and other procedures of which apply to this part. Actions taken pursuant to part 501 of this chapter with respect to the prohibitions contained in this part are considered actions taken pursuant to this part. Differing foreign policy and national security circumstances may result in differing interpretations of similar language among the parts of this chapter. No license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to those other parts authorizes any transaction prohibited by this part. No license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to any other provision of law or regulation authorizes any transaction prohibited by this part. No license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to this part relieves the involved parties from complying with any other applicable laws or regulations. Note to § 544.101 :
The sanctions implemented pursuant to the Weapons of Mass Destruction Trade Control Regulations set forth in part 539 of this chapter are separate and distinct from the sanctions implemented pursuant to this part, even though both programs have been imposed pursuant to the same declaration of national emergency in Executive Order 12938 of November 14, 1994. Accordingly, a “designated foreign person” whose goods, technology, or services are prohibited from being imported into the United States under part 539 is not necessarily a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 544.201(a). Consequently, the property and interests in property of a “designated foreign person” under part 539 are not blocked, unless the “designated foreign person” has separately become a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to § 544.201(a) or any other part of 31 CFR chapter V. Note, however, that the importation into the United States of goods, technology, or services (other than information or informational materials) produced or provided by a “designated foreign person” under part 539 is prohibited by that part.
Exhibit 34.2

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors 

U.S. Bank National Association

We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that U.S. Bank National Association (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the U.S. Bank Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities Platform (the “Platform”), for which the Company provides trustee, securities administration, registrar and paying agent services, as of and for the year ended March 31, 2018, except for servicing criteria Items 1122 (d)(1)(i)-(v), 1122 (d)(2)(i), 1122 (d)(2)(iii), 1122 (d)(2)(v)-(vii), 1122 (d)(3)(i), and 1122 (d)(4)(i)-(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by  them with respect to the servicing platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria.  Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that the evidence we obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. 

Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended March 31, 2018, for the U.S. Bank Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.  

/s/Ernst & Young LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota

May 31, 2018
§ 5.17 Will a debtor who owes a Treasury debt be ineligible for Federal loan assistance or Federal licenses, permits or privileges? ( a ) *Delinquent debtors barred from obtaining Federal loans or loan insurance or guaranties.* As required by 31 U.S.C. 3720B and 31 CFR 901.6, Treasury entities will not extend financial assistance in the form of a loan, loan guarantee, or loan insurance to any person delinquent on a debt owed to a Federal agency. This prohibition does not apply to disaster loans. Treasury entities may extend credit after the delinquency has been resolved. See 31 CFR 285.13 for standards defining when a “delinquency” is “resolved” for purposes of this prohibition.
( b ) *Suspension or revocation of eligibility for licenses, permits, or privileges.* Unless prohibited by law, Treasury entities should suspend or revoke licenses, permits, or other privileges for any inexcusable or willful failure of a debtor to pay a debt. The Treasury entity responsible for distributing the licenses, permits, or other privileges will establish policies and procedures governing suspension and revocation for delinquent debtors. If applicable, Treasury entities will advise the debtor in the notice required by § 5.4 of this part of the Treasury entities' ability to suspend or revoke licenses, permits or privileges. *See* § 5.4(a)(16) of this part.
§ 5.2 Why is the Treasury Department issuing these regulations and what do they cover? ( a ) *Scope.* This part provides procedures for the collection of Treasury debts. This part also provides procedures for collection of other debts owed to the United States when a request for offset of a Treasury payment is received by the Treasury Department from another agency (for example, when a Treasury Department employee owes a debt to the United States Department of Education).
( b ) *Applicability.* ( 1 ) This part applies to the Treasury Department when collecting a Treasury debt, to persons who owe Treasury debts, and to Federal agencies requesting offset of a payment issued by the Treasury Department as a payment agency (including salary payments to Treasury Department employees).
( 2 ) This part does not apply to tax debts nor to any debt for which there is an indication of fraud or misrepresentation, as described in § 900.3 of the FCCS, unless the debt is returned by the Department of Justice to the Treasury Department for handling.
( 3 ) This part does not apply to the Financial Management Service when acting on behalf of other Federal agencies and states to collect delinquent debt referred to the Financial Management Service for collection action as required or authorized by Federal law. *See* 31 CFR part 285.
( 4 ) Nothing in this part precludes collection or disposition of any debt under statutes and regulations other than those described in this part. *See, for example,* 5 U.S.C. 5705, Advancements and Deductions, which authorizes Treasury entities to recover travel advances by offset of up to 100% of a Federal employee's accrued pay. *See, also,* 5 U.S.C. 4108, governing the collection of training expenses. To the extent that the provisions of laws, other regulations, and Treasury Department enforcement policies differ from the provisions of this part, those provisions of law, other regulations, and Treasury Department enforcement policies apply to the remission or mitigation of fines, penalties, and forfeitures, and debts arising under the tariff laws of the United States, rather than the provisions of this part.
( c ) *Additional policies and procedures.* Treasury entities may, but are not required to, promulgate additional policies and procedures consistent with this part, the FCCS, and other applicable Federal law, policies, and procedures.
( d ) *Duplication not required.* Nothing in this part requires a Treasury entity to duplicate notices or administrative proceedings required by contract, this part, or other laws or regulations.
( e ) *Use of multiple collection remedies allowed.* Treasury entities and other Federal agencies may simultaneously use multiple collection remedies to collect a debt, except as prohibited by law. This part is intended to promote aggressive debt collection, using for each debt all available collection remedies. These remedies are not listed in any prescribed order to provide Treasury entities with flexibility in determining which remedies will be most efficient in collecting the particular debt.
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:The attached files are the following docket-related documents:
?  U.S. DOT/FAA - Notice of proposed rulemaking
?  U.S. DOT/FAA - Notice of proposed rulemaking grid
?  U.S. DOT/FAA - Economic and Regulatory Evaluation
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HAMLET PETROSYAN,

Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 19

- 71433

Agency No. A070

- 390

- 792

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 10 , 20 20 * *

Pasadena, California

Before: PAEZ and BADE , Circuit Judges, and GORDON, ** * District Judge.

Hamlet Petrosyan, a native and citizen of Armenia, petition s for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s (IJ) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Andrew P. Gordon, United States District Judge for

the District of Nevada, sitting by designation. 

# FILED

JUL 20 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2

of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). 1 We

have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252

. “We review factual findings, including

adverse credibility [findings], under the deferential substantial evidence

standard[,]” and reverse only when the evidence compels a contrary conclusion. Ai

Jun Zhi v. Holder , 751 F.3d 1088, 1091 (9th Cir. 2014). “ For applications filed

after May 11, 2005, such as [Petrosyan’s] , the credibility standards set forth in the

REAL ID Act apply. ” Id. We deny the petition.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s adverse credibi lity determination

based on Petrosyan ’s vague testimony about his past criminal history and

inconsistent testimony about whether he was physically harmed by his coworkers

and how his coworkers learned of his HIV status. The BIA found Petrosyan’s

explanation that his medication impacted his memory to be insufficient and

unpersuasive, noting that Petrosyan presented no evidence to the IJ or on appeal to

support his explanation. And the BIA rejected Petrosyan’s arguments about

interpreter issues because Petrosyan allowed the interview transcript to be admitted

into evidence and failed to identify w hat material information the interpreter

incorrectly translate d

. In the absence of credible testimony, Petros y an’s asylum

/ / / /

1 Petrosyan does not seek review of the BIA’s decision affirming the

denial of his CAT claim.3

and withholding of removal claims fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft , 348 F.3d 1153,

1156 (9th Cir. 2003).

We deny Petrosyan’s Moti on for Stay of Removal, Dkt. 5, as moot.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED

.
§ 539.308 Information or informational materials. ( a ) For purposes of this part, the term *information or informational materials* includes, but is not limited to, publications, films, posters, phonograph records, photographs, microfilms, microfiche, tapes, compact disks, CD ROMs, artworks, and news wire feeds.
( b ) To be considered information or informational materials, artworks must be classified under chapter heading 9701, 9702, or 9703 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of Transcend Services, Inc., certifies that to the undersigneds knowledge, the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, which accompanies this certification, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Transcend Services, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Lance Cornell      
|Lance Cornell          
|Chief Financial Officer

Date: November 9, 2009
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 339.1 Definitions of words and terms as used in this circular. Unless the context otherwise requires or indicates: ( a ) *Securities* mean outstanding U.S. Savings Bonds of Series E and U.S. Savings Notes (freedom shares).
( b ) *Owner* means an owner of securities, except a commercial bank in its own right (as distinguished from a representative or fiduciary capacity) and a nonresident alien who is a resident of an area with respect to which the Treasury Department restricts or regulates delivery of checks drawn against funds of the United States or any agency or instrumentality thereof. The term includes a registered owner, whether or not a natural person, either coowner (but only the *principal coowner* if Series H bonds are requested in a form of registration different from that on the securities submitted), a surviving beneficiary, or any other person who would be entitled to reissue under the regulation governing U.S. Savings Bonds,[1] such as, but not limited to, any person entitled to succeed to the estate of a deceased owner.
( c ) *Commercial bank* means a bank accepting demand deposits.
( d ) *Interest* means the increment in value on Series E savings bonds and on savings notes.
( e ) *Principal coowner* means a coowner who purchased the securities submitted for exchange with his own funds or received them as a gift, legacy or inheritance or as a result of judicial proceedings and had them reissued in coownership form, provided he has received no contribution in money or money's worth from the other coowner for designating him on the securities.
Footnotes -
339.1
[1] Department Circular No. 530, current revision (31 CFR part 315). Copies may be obtained from any Federal Reserve Bank or Branch or the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, Washington, DC 20220.
---

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                          
|---------------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. §1350,                                   
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                             
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002

In connection with the Annual Report of HEXO Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 40-F/A for the period ended July 31, 2019 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen
Burwash, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                    
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                  
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Date: October 31, 2019 | By: | /s/
      Stephen Burwash    
|---------------------- | --- | -----------------------------
|                       |     | Stephen Burwash              
|                       |     | Chief Financial Officer      
|                       |     | (Principal Financial Officer)

---
#### § 515.553 Bank accounts of official representatives in Cuba of foreign governments.

Specific licenses are issued authorizing payments from accounts of official representatives in Cuba of foreign governments for transactions which are not inconsistent with the purposes of any of the regulations in this chapter.

[39 FR 25319, July 10, 1974]
V

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2613

For the relief of Rabon Lowry.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 9, 1995

Mr. ROSE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Rabon Lowry.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SATISFACTION OF CLAIM.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Treasury

5 shall pay, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise

6 appropriated, to Rabon Lowry of Pembroke, North Caro7 lina, individually and as president of Pembroke Machine

8 Company, Inc., the sum of $9,120,000 for damages he in9 curred as a result of the breach of Government Contract

10 number DAAA09–85–C–0630 by the United States De11 partment of the Army.
2

•HR 2613 IH

1 (b) CONDITION OF PAYMENT.—The payment shall be

2 in full satisfaction of any of claims Rabon Lowry may have

3 against the United States arising from Government Con4 tract number DAAA09–85–C–0630.

5 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON AGENTS AND ATTORNEYS FEES.

6 It shall be unlawful for an amount that exceeds 10

7 percent of the sum described in section 1 to be paid to

8 or received by any agent or attorney for any service ren9 dered in connection with the benefits provided by this Act.

10 Any person who violates this section shall be guilty of an

11 infraction and shall be subject to a fine in the amount

12 provided in title 18, United States Code.

Æ
§ 30.17 Q-17: How do the effective date provisions apply with respect to the requirements under section 111 of EESA? ( a ) *General rule.* The requirements under this part with respect to sections 111(b), 111(c), 111(d) and 111(f) are effective upon June 15, 2009. The guidance under this part with respect to those sections supersedes any previous guidance applicable to a TARP recipient to the extent that guidance is inconsistent with those requirements, but supersedes that guidance only as of June 15, 2009. To the extent previous contractual provisions are not inconsistent with ARRA or the guidance under this part, those contractual provisions remain in effect and continue to apply in accordance with their terms.
( b ) *Bonus payment limitation.* The bonus payment limitation provision under § 30.10 (Q-10) of this part does not apply to bonus payments paid or accrued by TARP recipients or their employees before June 15, 2009. Certain bonus payments may relate to a service period beginning before and ending after June 15, 2009. In these circumstances, the employee will not be treated as having accrued the bonus payment on or after June 15, 2009 if the bonus payment is at least reduced to reflect the portion of the service period that occurs after June 15, 2009. If the employee is an SEO or most highly compensated employee at the time the net bonus payment after such reduction would otherwise be paid, the amount still may not be paid until such time as bonus payments to that employee are permitted.
BERING SEA
UNITED STATES BATHYMETRIC MAP

—
+ 3 at -
an ata ie Ta a] ae ea Pee ae | Sa ey er cll ice cad cel ona
Ss db Ec ee ra a a a a P SSS Sea
=- al a, Fee ee ot elie i | a . NS we | | | |
bar ; wie Pepe pee |e pel”
= Ss <4] la
Ta wile Noes | = oe |
=] R K
ys 5 oF ET : ps TT Ue a SB
=) ; | = ie
| ‘ Ls -_
Pa er
~ i re EC
=
se |
we
-_ =
a ee
| an
i -_
es
a
ll ow | =
1 ee,
a #1,
£ A | At
pate ie |e | aA pe) | ee el a all tt hal Vice a maa: | 3
Lee | | | i \ ae
Bets ia \ iF
ee a e a | rs ee ca = Ff
[wy
—
|
{

Sorter Sm ng os en Paha’ me Warren OC = ead 8 CAPE NEWENHAM WEST
meen Pompe Meme Coat, Lie SOAR Mane Tn (4 ey mee tn US DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Sons ey he es AROMAL OCEANIC AND ATOHOWERIC ADMMETEATION NOS NO 33
sae Howry ow mare som ct Wt Dos Caren a OShaad ae WATIONA: OcbaN SEmMICE

‘The paanweneey ae the meat one eee tay Hommel Lomeng aurpoume het ma Gur ponet reer

50 Ore ‘om the owen Shemp 98

HATHAMEINE CONFOW Huttinonca WF MeEND TO ntasiMiNe SEI
RULENENETED ATO TALL

Darya Mbate SOWA LOW WATER

ae oe
HomeDiplomatic Security Service Memorial...Syed Ameer  Badsha

# 				 Syed Ameer  Badsha			

				Local Law Enforcement			

Deceased				February 28, 2003			

**Please contact DS Public Affairs (dspublicaffairs@state.gov) if you have an image of this individual.**

Tags

Diplomatic Security Service MemorialPakistan

Back to Top
Exhibit 99.1

                          CEO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Emclaire Financial Corp. (the
Corporation) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here (the Report), I, David
L. Cox, Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/  David L. Cox
-----------------

David L. Cox
Chief Executive Officer


May 13, 2003