alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

###### Editorial Note on Part 353

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 353 appear at 79 FR 8859, Feb. 14, 2014.

#### § 353.44 Withdrawal of request for payment.

(a) *Withdrawal by owner or coowner.* An owner or coowner, who has surrendered a bond to a Federal Reserve Bank or Branch or to the Bureau of the Fiscal Service or to an authorized paying agent with an appropriate request for payment, may withdraw the request if notice of intent to withdraw is received by the same agency prior to payment either in cash or through the issuance of the redemption check.

(b) *Withdrawal on behalf of deceased owner or incompetent.* A request for payment may be withdrawn under the same conditions as in paragraph (a) of this section by the executor or administrator of the estate of a deceased owner or by the person or persons who could have been entitled to the bond under subpart L, or by the legal representative of the estate of a person under legal disability, unless surrender of the bond for payment has eliminated the interest of a surviving coowner or beneficiary. See § 353.70 (b) and (c).
#### § 539.310 Person.

The term *person* means an individual or entity.
IIA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1253

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

DECEMBER 13, 1995

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

AN ACT

To rename the San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge

as the Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1253 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SAN FRANCISCO BAY NATIONAL WILDLIFE REF2 UGE RENAMED AS DON EDWARDS SAN FRAN3 CISCO BAY NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE.

4 (a) REFUGE RENAMED.—The San Francisco Bay

5 National Wildlife Refuge (established by the Act entitled

6 ‘‘An Act to provide for the establishment of the San Fran7 cisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge’’, approved June 30,

8 1972 (86 Stat. 399 et seq.)), is hereby renamed and shall

9 be known as ‘‘the Don Edwards San Francisco Bay Na10 tional Wildlife Refuge’’.

11 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any statute,

12 rule, regulation, Executive order, publication, map, or

13 paper or other document of the United States to the San

14 Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge is deemed to refer

15 to the Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife

16 Refuge.

17 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The Act entitled

18 ‘‘An Act to provide for the establishment of the San Fran19 cisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge’’, approved June 30,

20 1972 (86 Stat. 399 et seq.), is amended by striking ‘‘San

21 Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge’’ each place it ap-
3

•HR 1253 RFS

1 pears and inserting ‘‘Don Edwards San Francisco Bay

2 National Wildlife Refuge’’.

Passed the House of Representatives December 12,

1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
#### § 542.302 Construction or engineering services.

The term *construction or engineering services,* as used in § 542.201(a)(13)(v), means the provision of services for the construction of buildings or structures, or for the production, procurement, devising, framing, or arranging in Syria of parts or materials to fabricate, shape, or form buildings or structures, and assistance, advisory, consultative, design, and recommendation services concerning engineering matters or during any phase of an engineering project, including the on-site design, development, assembly, or construction of residential, commercial, or institutional buildings in Syria. The term applies to engaging in new work, additions, or alterations of commercial or institutional buildings. Engineering design services may be for: the construction of foundations and building structures (*i.e.,* structural engineering); mechanical and electrical installations for buildings; the construction of civil engineering works; industrial processes and production; or other engineering designs, such as those for acoustics, vibration, traffic control systems, or prototype development for new products.

[89 FR 48318, June 6, 2024]
§ 535.440 Commercially reasonable interest rates. ( a ) For purposes of §§ 535.212 and 535.213, what is meant by “commercially reasonable rates” depends on the particular circumstances. In the case of time or savings deposits, the “commercially reasonable rate” is that rate provided for by the deposit agreement or applicable law. With respect to other obligations where the rate remains to be determined, it is presently expected that the “commercially reasonable rate” will be the rate agreed upon by the bank and Iran. However, where a deposit has in fact operated as a demand account under Treasury license, it would be appropriate to treat the deposit for purposes of §§ 535.212 and 535.213 as a non-interest bearing account. Furthermore, in the event that the Iran-U.S Claims Tribunal (the “Tribunal”) determines that interest additional to that agreed upon between the bank and Iran, or compensation or damages in lieu of interest, is due Iran, then that amount determined by the Tribunal to be owing to Iran shall be transferred as, or as part of, the interest at “commercially reasonable rates” required to be transferred pursuant to §§ 535.212 and 535.213, regardless of any settlement between the bank and Iran or any release or discharge that Iran may have given the bank.
( b ) The contingent interest of Iran in any liability for further or additional interest, or compensation or damages in lieu of interest, that may be claimed in, and determined by the Tribunal, constitutes an interest of Iran in property for purposes of this part, and no agreement between Iran and any person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States is effective to extinguish such Iranian interest in property unless so specifically licensed by the Treasury Department.
( c ) For deposits held as time deposits, no penalty shall be imposed for early withdrawal. (In this connection, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System has determined that application of the penalty for early withdrawal of time deposits transferred before maturity, pursuant to § 535.213 is not required.)
(Secs. 201-207, 91 Stat. 1626, 50 U.S.C. 1701-1706; E.O. 12170, 44 FR 65729; E.O. 12205; 45 FR 24099; E.O. 12211, 45 FR 26605; E.O. 12276, 46 FR 7913; E.O. 12277, 46 FR 7915; E.O. 12278, 46 FR 7917; E.O. 12279, 46 FR 7919; E.O. 12280, 46 FR 7921; E.O. 12281, 46 FR 7923; E.O. 12282, 46 FR 7925; and E.O. 12294, 46 FR 14111)
[48 FR 253, Jan. 4, 1983]
#### ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bambi LIZOTTE a/k/a Bambi Francis, Defendant-Appellant, Ruth Lizotte, as Administratrix of the Estate of Terry Lizotte; Ruth Lizotte, as Guardian for minor children Nicholas Lizotte, Jay Lizotte and Terry Lizotte, Jr.; Ruth Lizotte, Individually; James Mongeon; Wayne Miller; The United States of America; Bernard Chartier; Mark Brierre; Nicholas Ruggiero; Daniel Slowick; Eugene Bisson; Dolly Bisson, Defendants.

No. 00-7758.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Feb. 22, 2001.

Bambi Lizotte, East Middlebury, VT, pro se.

Patricia S. Orr, Wilson Powell & Lang, Burlington, VT, for appellee.

Present KEARSE, LEVAL, and KATZMANN, Circuit Judges.

*SUMMARY ORDER*

This cause came on to be heard on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Vermont, and was submitted by appellant *pro se*and by counsel for appellee.

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is now hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of said District Court be and it hereby is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in Chief Judge Murtha’s Ruling on Cross Motions for Summary Judgment, dated April 20, 2000.

We have considered all of appellant’s contentions on this appeal and have found them to be without merit. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
§ 542.204 Expenses of maintaining blocked physical property; liquidation of blocked property. ( a ) Except as otherwise authorized, and notwithstanding the existence of any rights or obligations conferred or imposed by any international agreement or contract entered into or any license or permit granted prior to the effective date, all expenses incident to the maintenance of physical property blocked pursuant to § 542.201 shall be the responsibility of the owners or operators of such property, which expenses shall not be met from blocked funds.
( b ) Property blocked pursuant to § 542.201 may, in the discretion of OFAC, be sold or liquidated and the net proceeds placed in a blocked interest-bearing account in the name of the owner of the property.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Lance Cornell, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Transcend Services, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2009; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles; 

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: May 11, 2009
#### Commonwealth vs. Thomas F. Sparks.

No. 96-P-1108.

February 19, 1997.

*Mayhem.*

The defendant appeals from a conviction of mayhem in violation of G. L. c. 265, § 14. The only issue on appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence of the defendant’s specific intent to maim or disfigure.

Considered in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, the jury could have found the following facts beyond a reasonable doubt. See *Commonwealth*v. *Latimore,*378 Mass. 671, 677 (1979). On the night in question, the victim, Steven Anderson, stole the defendant’s gold necklace and ran away. The defendant gave chase. He asked Anderson to give back the necklace, but Anderson attacked him. The defendant fought back. He hit Anderson with his closed hands and kicked him in the head more than once for at least five minutes.

When the police arrived at the scene, the defendant was straddling Anderson, who was unconscious and bleeding from his face. The defendant *832was also shaking and yelling at Anderson, whose blood was on his shoes, pant legs, and his right hand. Due to the considerable force of the blows, Anderson sustained a fracture to the bone around one of his eyes. His eye was set back three millimeters into its socket, and he experienced double vision.

*Daniel W. Rice*for the defendant.

*Alison M. Takacs,*Assistant District Attorney, for the Commonwealth.

Mayhem requires proof of specific intent to maim or disfigure another person. *Commonwealth*v. *Hogan,*7 Mass. App. Ct. 236, 244, *S.C.,*379 Mass. 190 (1979). Specific intent may be inferred from the nature of the injuries as well as evidence that “the injuries arose from a sustained or atrocious attack.” *Commonwealth*v. *Cleary,*41 Mass. App. Ct. 214, 217 (1996) (a single blow with an ax handle was insufficient to infer intent). See and compare *Commonwealth*v. *Farrell,*322 Mass. 606, 618-619 (1948) (victim repeatedly slashed with a razor, and the defendant’s initials burned into her skin); *Commonwealth*v. *Tucceri, 9*Mass. App. Ct. 844, 845 (1980) (victim’s face struck, and handfuls of dirt rubbed into her eyes); *Commonwealth*v. *Hamm,*19 Mass. App. Ct. 72, 80 (1984) (victim “stomped” in the head and face); *Commonwealth*v. *Mercado,*24 Mass. App. Ct. 391, 393-395 (1987) (repeated beating with a baseball bat); *Commonwealth*v. *Lazarevich,*28 Mass. App. Ct. 147, 154-155 (1989) (abusive treatment over time).

Here, the evidence, in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, was sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt. The jury could infer the defendant’s intent to maim from his *prolonged*attack and the nature of Anderson’s eye injuries. See, e.g., *Commonwealth*v. *Hamm, supra; Commonwealth*v. *Mercado, supra; Commonwealth*v. *Lazarovich, supra.*Compare *Commonwealth*v. *Cleary, supra*(where the defendant struck a *single*blow to the victim in anger “on the spur of the moment”).

*Judgment affirmed.*
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2484

To amend the Clean Air Act to modify the reformulated gas program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 17, 1995

Mr. MINGE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Clean Air Act to modify the reformulated

gas program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EPA REFORMULATED GAS PROGRAM.

4 Section 211(k)(1) of the Clean Air Act of 1955 (42

5 U.S.C. 7545(k)(1)) is amended as follows:

6 (1) By inserting ‘‘, including a requirement for

7 the use of renewable oxygenates,’’ after ‘‘establishing

8 requirements’’.
2

•HR 2484 IH

1 (2) By inserting ‘‘, including the environmental

2 importance of using renewable oxygenates’’ after

3 ‘‘environmental impacts and energy requirements’’.

Æ
#### § 539.201 Prohibited importation of goods, technology, or services.

Except as otherwise authorized, the importation into the United States, on or after the effective date, directly or indirectly, of any goods, technology, or services produced or provided by a designated foreign person, other than information or informational materials, is prohibited.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Assistant Secretary Pyatt’s Travel to Spain

# 									Assistant Secretary Pyatt’s Travel to Spain							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

October 2, 2023

Assistant Secretary of State for Energy Resources Geoffrey R. Pyatt will travel to Madrid, Spain, October 1-4. On October 2, Assistant Secretary Pyatt will deliver opening remarks for the International Climate and Energy Summit hosted by the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the Government of Spain and participate in high-level roundtable conversations with Ministers, industry, and civil society to promote clean energy progress ahead of the 28th Conference of Parties (COP28). Assistant Secretary Pyatt will also meet bilaterally with Spanish officials to welcome Spain’s progress on decarbonization, clean hydrogen, and the energy transition. Throughout the Summit, Assistant Secretary Pyatt will work with G7+ allies and partners to support a sustainable energy future for Ukraine.

For further media information, please contact ENR-PD-Clearances@state.gov

Tags

Bureau of Energy ResourcesBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial International TravelSpain

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Assistant Secretary Noyes Travel to Qatar and Albania

# 									Assistant Secretary Noyes Travel to Qatar and Albania							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

February 3, 2023

Assistant Secretary for the Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration Julieta Valls Noyes will travel to Qatar and Albania February 4-10.  In Doha, Qatar, and Tirana and Shengjin, Albania, Assistant Secretary Noyes will meet with government officials and international organization partners on our refugee processing efforts, and with Afghans awaiting resettlement to the United States.

Tags

AlbaniaBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of Near Eastern AffairsBureau of Population, Refugees, and MigrationOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial International TravelQatar

Back to Top
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [WY-923-1310-FI; WYW144811]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of proposed reinstatement of terminated oil and gas lease.

# SUMMARY:

Under the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 3108.2-3(a) and (b)(2), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for reinstatement from Anadarko Petroleum Corporation and Lance Oil & Gas Company for noncompetitive oil and gas lease WYW144811 for land in Johnson County, Wyoming. The petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due since the date the lease terminated under the law.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management, Carmen E. Lovett, Land Law Examiner, at (307) 775-6160.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The lessees have agreed to the amended lease terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10.00 per acre or fraction thereof, per year and 18                    2/3                     percent, respectively. The lessees have paid the required $500 administrative fee and $163 to reimburse the Department for the cost of this                     **Federal Register**                     notice. The lessees have met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in sections 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to reinstate lease WYW144811 effective April 1, 2009, under the original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above. BLM has not issued a valid lease affecting the lands.                

Carmen E. Lovett,

Land Law Examiner.

[FR Doc. E9-20322 Filed 8-21-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Alleged Pan Am Flight 103 Bombmaker in U.S. Custody

# 									Alleged Pan Am Flight 103 Bombmaker in U.S. Custody							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

December 12, 2022

Today is an important day for justice. Following an intensive diplomatic effort, Abu Agila Mohammad Mas’ud Kheir al-Marimi is in U.S. custody to face trial for his alleged role in the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103. The bombing resulted in the deaths of 270 people nearly 34 years ago on December 21, 1988. The victims came from 21 nations and included 35 students from Syracuse University returning home to spend the holidays with their families, two Diplomatic Security Agents from the State Department, a CIA officer, and 11 residents of Lockerbie, Scotland.

We wish to thank all those who played a role in ensuring Mas’ud faces justice in the United States. The prosecution of Mas’ud is the product of years of cooperation between U.S. and Scottish authorities and the efforts of Libyan authorities over many years. I want to particularly express my gratitude for the tireless work of the U.S. Department of Justice to pursue and prosecute Mas’ud.

The United States has never and will never stop seeking justice on behalf of the American people. My first priority is the safety and security of our citizens overseas, and we will remain clear-eyed and focused with our partners in pursuing those who would seek to do us harm.

Tags

Bureau of Near Eastern AffairsCriminal JusticeLibyaOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of StateSecurity

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 359.13 What are composite rates?

Composite rates are single, annual interest rates that reflect the combined effects of the fixed rate and the semiannual inflation rate. The composite rate will always be greater than or equal to 0.00%.

[73 FR 65544, Nov. 4, 1008]
40374.

#### FOWLER et al. v. THE STATE.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

Wendell Fowler and Dan Corbin, Jr., were jointly indicted, tried 'and convicted for the offense of burglary. They were given onet to five years on each of the five counts of the indictment. Motions for new trial, based upon the general grounds only, were filed by each defendant, each of which was overruled by the trial court. To such adverse'ruling each defendant excepts and assigns error. *Held:*

Evidence that stolen goods were found in the possession of the defendants without such possession being satisfactorily explained, along with evidence of a conspiracy existing between the defendants, coupled with the additional evidence of both defendants having fled the house where the stolen goods were located upon the approach of police officers, was sufficient to authorize the verdict.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Frankum and Jordan, JJ., concur.*

*480Decided October 15, 1963.

*Walter M. Henritze, Jr., W. L. Gower,*for plaintiffs in error.

*William T. Boyd, Solicitor General, J. Walter LeCraw, Paul Ginsberg,*contra.