alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
., 

SERVED: February 20, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

ALASKA AIRLINES, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA 2013- 0287 

NOTICE OF HEARING DATES 

The court intends to setthis matter for hearing during the month of June 2014, in Seattle, 

Washington. On or before February 28, 2014, the parties should advise the undersigned of their 

availability during the week of June 2 through June 6, June 9 through 13, June 16 through 20, or June 

23 through 27, 2014. 

Settled cases will not be removed from the docket until the Judge receives the proper p1eading(s). 

Pleadings may be forwarded by fax, express mail, courier or postal service. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
~( 

} 

SERVICE LIST 

FDMS No. FAA-2013-0287 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

TEL: 202-385-8229 · 

FAJ<: 202~493-5142 

ONE COPY 

Joanna L. Simon, Respondent's Counsel 

Morrison & Foerster, LLP 

12531 High Bluff Drive 

San Diego, CA 92130-2040 

TEL: 858.;720-51 00 

FAX: 858-720-5125 

Email: JoannaSimon@mofo.com 

Bradley Tilde, President 

Alaska Airlines, Inc., Respondent 

P.O. Box 68900 

Seattle, Washington 96168 

Robert Spitzer, Complainant's Counsel 

FAA Attorney, Office of Regional Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, Washington 98057 

TEL: 425-227-1417 

FAJ<: 425-227-1007 

E-MAIL: robert.spitzer@faa.gov 

. The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

F AJ<: 202-366-7536 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 

2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2
Exhibit 99.2

                          CFO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Emclaire Financial Corp. (the
Corporation) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here (the Report), I, William
C. Marsh, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/  William C. Marsh
---------------------

William C. Marsh
Chief Financial Officer


May 13, 2003
#### MERRILL-RUCKGABER COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES.

[49 O. Ols. It., 553; 241 U. S. R„ 387.]

*On the plaintiff’s appeal.*

The Government entered into a contract with the plaintiff to do certain construction work in the city of New York in accordance with plans and specifications made a part of the contract, and this suit is brought to recover compensation for work alleged to be extra or additional to that covered by the contract.

The court below decides:

Where the contract between the parties clearly refers to a particular building, the main rear wall of which was to be underpinned, the contractor could not be required to underpin another and distinct building under the provision of the contract that “the decision of the Supervising Architect as to the proper interpretation of the drawings and specifications shall be final.”

The parties to a contract may agree to submit differences of views in the interpretation of drawings and specifications to the decision of an architect or engineer, and the validity of such an agreement is unquestionable in the absence of bad faith, fraud, or a failure to exercise an honest judgment.

In construing a contract the court will ascertain the intention of the parties and to that end will, as far as possible, ascertain the situation of the parties, as well as the purposes had in view at the time the contract was entered into.

To ascertain the intention of a contract it is not lawful to disassociate a single phrase, term, or word from the context and give to it a meaning independent of the other terms of the instrument.

Where reading the whole contract it seems its intention was to provide for or require certain work to be done, the contractor is not entitled to recover compensation additional to the contract price for performing said work.

The decision of the court below is affirmed.

Mr. Justice McKenna

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court June 5, 1916.
§ 50.95 Remitting the surcharge. ( a ) Each insurer shall report direct written premium and Federal terrorism policy surcharges to Treasury on a monthly and annual basis during the assessment period. Reporting will be on a form prescribed by Treasury and will be due according to the following schedule: ( 1 ) *Monthly:* From the beginning of the assessment period through November, on the last business day of the calendar month following the month for which premium is reported, and
( 2 ) *Annually:* March 1 for the prior calendar year.
( b ) The monthly statements provided to Treasury will include the following: ( 1 ) Cumulative calendar year direct written premium adjusted for premium not subject to the Federal terrorism policy surcharge, summarized by policy year.
( 2 ) The aggregate Federal terrorism policy surcharge amount calculated by applying the established surcharge percentage to the insurer's adjusted direct written premium by policy year.
( 3 ) Insurer certification of the submission.
( c ) The annual statements to be provided to Treasury will include the following: ( 1 ) Direct written premium, adjusted for premium not subject to the Federal terrorism policy surcharge, summarized by policy year and by commercial line of insurance as specified in § 50.4(w).
( 2 ) The aggregate Federal terrorism policy surcharge amount calculated by applying the established surcharge percentage to the insurer's adjusted direct written premium by policy year.
( 3 ) In the case of an insurer that has chosen not to collect the Federal terrorism policy surcharge from its policyholders as provided in § 50.94(f), a certification that the expense of collecting the Surcharge during the assessment period would have exceeded the amount of the surcharges collected over the assessment period.
( 4 ) Insurer certification of the submission.
( d ) The calculated aggregate Federal terrorism policy surcharge amount, as described in paragraphs (b)(2) and (c)(2) of this section, shall be remitted to Treasury upon submission of each monthly and annual statement. Through its submitted statements, an insurer obtains credit for a refund of any Federal terrorism policy surcharge previously remitted to Treasury that was subsequently returned by the insurer to a policyholder as attributable to refunded premium under § 50.94(e). A negative calculated amount in a monthly or annual statement indicates payment from Treasury is due to the insurer.
( e ) Reporting shall continue for the one-year period following the end of the assessment period established by Treasury, unless otherwise permitted by Treasury.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2559

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an expanded medical

expenses deduction.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 30, 1995

Mr. SMITH of Michigan introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

an expanded medical expenses deduction.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Health Care Tax Eq5 uity Act of 1995.’’

6 SEC. 2. EXPANDED DEDUCTION FOR HEALTH INSURANCE

7 PREMIUMS AND MEDICAL EXPENSES.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 213 of

9 the Internal Revenue Code is amended to read as follows:

10 ‘‘(a) ALLOWANCE OF DEDUCTION.—
2

HR 2559 IH

1 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Deductions shall be allowed

2 for expenses paid during the taxable year, not com3 pensated for by insurance or otherwise, for medical

4 care of the taxpayer, his spouse, or a dependent (as

5 defined by section 152)—

6 ‘‘(A) to the extent such expenses do not ex7 ceed $1800 ($2400 in the case of a joint re8 turn); and

9 ‘‘(B) to the extent such expenses, exclud10 ing those expenses deducted under subsection

11 (a)(1)(A), exceed 7.5 percent of adjusted gross

12 income.

13 ‘‘(2) TREATMENT OF EMPLOYER- OR GOVERN14 MENT-PROVIDED MEDICAL CARE.—The deduction in

15 subsection (a)(1)(A) shall be reduced by the sum

16 of—

17 ‘‘(A) the value of employer-provided cov18 erage for medical care; and

19 ‘‘(B) the expenses paid by any government

20 (except in the capacity of an employer) of medi21 cal care.’’

22 (b) ADDITION OF EXPANDED DEDUCTION TO COM23 PUTATION OF ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME.—Subsection (a)

24 of section 62 of the Internal Revenue Code is amended

25 by inserting after paragraph (14) the following language:
3

HR 2559 IH

1 ‘‘(15) HEALTH CARE EXPENSES.—The deduc2 tion allowed by section 213 to the extent not in ex3 cess of the amount applicable under subsection

4 (a)(1)(A).’’

5 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

6 subsections (a) and (b) shall apply to taxable years begin7 ning after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 225.4 Pledge of book-entry Government obligations. ( a ) *General.* Except as otherwise provided by the Secretary in procedural instructions, an obligor, or a depositary acting as agent or sub-agent for the obligor, or the bond official, shall arrange a pledge pursuant to the prior agreement and approval of the bond official, of book-entry Government obligations. The Government obligations must be transferred to an account for the benefit of the bond official. The custodian holding the Government obligations is not required to establish that the agreement and approval of the bond official has been obtained prior to such a transfer.
( b ) *Receipt.* Upon the transfer of Government obligations to an account for the benefit of the bond official, the custodian will promptly issue a receipt or an activity statement, or both, to the bond official and to the obligor or a depositary acting as agent or sub-agent for the obligor.
( c ) *Effect of the transfer.* Book-entry Government obligations credited to an account for the benefit of the bond official shall have the effect as provided in part 357 of this title, or in other applicable regulations.
UNITED STATES:

hermes rm terse cing pod = magenta teed te He Sts Ae
Jesrtn Hhewy nt maby ay of ME Chr Emons Rall OMe Poetammes Em
om oe prevsomnd on tet mes win he hedens Imag penn toch
oe teste OCS Ores Prvvaonon Dagre pewtkle hom he timees Abemegreeee
—

(vara Fereceree Apes Poa ned Gi Zoe RIO me te dm
os

Het Reena Dense

BATHYMETRIC MAP

Pbtabed 46 Wasbrupes. 110
US DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
NATIONAL OCEANIC AMD ATMOSPHERE ADWIYETRATION
ATONAL — erect

BATIEMETIIC CONTOUE MTEBEALS 13 MTEES TO: 200 MATTER CERT,
WHERCE 0 METERS TO AMAvoiute DEPT

Uaryee fobaby GOWER LOW WATER

CAPE LOOKOUT
(n450124W)

BATHYMETRIC MAP L128
§ 54.6011-1 General requirement of return, statement, or list. ( a ) *Minimum funding standards or excess contributions for self-employed individuals and section 403(b)(7)(A) custodial accounts.* Any employer or individual liable for tax under section 4971, 4972 or 4973(a)(2) (for a custodial account under section 403(b)(7)(A)) shall file an annual return on Form 5330 and shall include therein the information required by such form and the instructions issued with respect thereto.
( b ) *Tax on prohibited transactions.* Every disqualified person (as defined in section 4975(e)(2)) liable for the tax imposed under section 4975(a) with respect to a prohibited transaction shall file an annual return on Form 5330 and shall include therein the information required by such form and the instructions issued with respect thereto. The annual return on Form 5330 shall be filed with respect to each prohibited transaction and for each taxable year (or part thereof) of the disqualified person in the taxable period (as defined in section 4975(f)(2)) beginning on the date on which such prohibited transaction occurs.
( c ) *Entity manager tax on prohibited tax shelter transactions* — ( 1 ) *In general.* Any entity manager of a tax-exempt entity described in section 4965(c)(4), (c)(5), (c)(6), or (c)(7) who is liable for tax under section 4965(a)(2) shall file a return on Form 5330, “Return of Excise Taxes Related to Employee Benefit Plans,” on or before the 15th day of the fifth month following the close of such entity manager's taxable year during which the entity entered into the prohibited tax shelter transaction, and shall include therein the information required by such form and the instructions issued with respect thereto.
( 2 ) *Transition rule.* A Form 5330, “Return of Excise Taxes Related to Employee Benefit Plans,” for an excise tax under section 4965 that was due on or before October 4, 2007, will be deemed to have been filed on the due date if it was filed by October 4, 2007, and if the section 4965 tax that was required to be reported on that Form 5330 was paid by October 4, 2007.
( d ) *Effective/applicability date.* Paragraph (c) of this section is applicable on July 6, 2007.
[T.D. 7838, 47 FR 44249, Oct. 7, 1982, as amended by T.D. 9334, 72 FR 36873, July 6, 2007; T.D. 9492, 75 FR 38708, July 6, 2010; 75 FR 46845, Aug. 4, 2010]
#### § 544.402 Effect of amendment.

Unless otherwise specifically provided, any amendment, modification, or revocation of any provision in or appendix to this part or chapter or of any order, regulation, ruling, instruction, or license issued by or under the direction of the Director of the Office of Foreign Assets Control does not affect any act done or omitted, or any civil or criminal suit or proceeding commenced or pending prior to such amendment, modification, or revocation. All penalties, forfeitures, and liabilities under any such order, regulation, ruling, instruction, or license continue and may be enforced as if such amendment, modification, or revocation had not been made.
Home2022 Certificates of Competency for Nominees to be Chiefs of Mission...Bond, Candace – Republic of Trinidad and Tobago – April 2022

# 									Bond, Candace – Republic of Trinidad and Tobago – April 2022							

Certificate of Competency

April 4, 2022

UNITED STATES SENATE

SUBJECT: Ambassadorial Nomination: Certificate of Demonstrated Competence — Foreign Service Act, Section 304(a)(4)

POST: Republic of Trinidad and Tobago

CANDIDATE: Candace Bond

Candace Bond currently serves as the President and CEO of AESA Inc., a Los Angeles-based company offering business advisory services in real estate and community development with an emphasis on environmental stability, governance, education, and health equity. As a committed social entrepreneur and corporate strategist, she has engaged in both the public and private sectors to drive community development and have a meaningful and sustainable social impact. Presently, she serves as a Board Member of California Head Start, is the Chair-Elect of the Board of the Greater LA Education Foundation, and Chair of the MLK Health and Wellness Community Development Corporation. She is a founding member of BioscienceLA, LA County’s Innovation and Catalyst Entrepreneurial Hub to accelerate growth and development of LA County’s bioscience industry. She also served on the Board of the Los Angeles County Office of Education, the nation’s largest regional education agency.

Earlier in her career she was the President and CEO of Infusion Media Partners and VP and General Manager of Essence Entertainment. She is Chair of the Malibu Foundation and Board Member of Women Founders Network, and member of the Southern California Edison Clean Energy Access Working Group. She also serves on the California State Treasurer’s Housing, Economic Development, Jobs and Opportunity Zone Ad Hoc Committee. Her wide-ranging business background, her commitment to effecting meaningful and sustained social change, and her experience in addressing issues of health, housing, education and workforce development, make her a well-qualified candidate for Ambassador to Trinidad and Tobago.

Ms. Bond graduated cum laude with her B.A. from Harvard University and her MBA from Harvard University Business School and is the recipient of a number of leadership and service awards.

Back to Top
- Division Home
- Key Topics
- Contact Us

HomeAgricultural Policy...Food Safety

# 									Food Safety							

Ensuring the health and well-being of American consumers, working to preserve market access for American agriculture producers, and protecting the integrity of our environment and natural resources are three of the office’s core missions. Our office works closely with a number of regulatory agencies to monitor food safety risks from imported products. We also support American farmers and the agricultural sector by dealing directly with trading partners and supporting negotiations to reduce or eliminate unfair barriers to trade related to food safety, animal health, and plant health.

### Protecting Consumer Health and Preserving Market Access

#### Codex Alimentarius Commission

Part of the World Health Organization (WHO) and Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Codex Alimentarius is the international food standard setting body that seeks to protect consumers worldwide and ensure fair trade practices by developing food standards and guidelines based on scientific analysis. Codex standards are used as benchmarks for national food regulatory policy around the world, particularly in developing countries. As a member of the U.S. Codex Policy Committee, the State Department’s Economic and Business Affairs Bureau works with the USDA’s U.S. Codex Office as well as other U.S. government agencies to facilitate global consensus building on standards to ensure safe food.  The Office of Agricultural Policy is a member of the U.S. Codex Technical Committee.

#### WTO Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures

Our office serves on the U.S. delegation to the WTO Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) measures, which meets three times per year in Geneva, Switzerland. There, the U.S. delegation advocates for improved market access for U.S. agricultural and food products, calls on other countries to abide by their WTO obligations, and defends U.S. agricultural and food safety policies. The delegation also meets individually with trading partners to discuss trade irritants in a less formal setting. The U.S. Trade Representative leads in WTO SPS Committee negotiations, and the Department of Agriculture, Food and Drug Administration, and Environmental Protection Agency also play an integral role.

Tags

AgricultureBureau of Economic and Business AffairsDivision for Trade Policy and NegotiationsFood and Agriculture OrganizationFood SecurityWorld Health Organization

Back to Top
40357.

#### WILLIAMS v. METROPOLITAN HOME IMPROVEMENT COMPANY.

Decided October 4, 1963.

*J. L. Jordan,*for plaintiff in error.

*Claude Hambrick,*contra.

Jordan, Judge.

Metropolitan Home Improvement Company-filed suit against George Williams in the Civil Court of Fulton County. The petition alleged that the defendant was indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $4,312.80 on a promissory note, dated September 26, 1962, which was past due and unpaid; that said note provided for the payment of attorney’s fees in the amount of 15 percent of the principal sum, if said note was collected by law; and that on January 22, 1963, the defendant was notified in writing that suit would be instituted in which recovery of said attorney’s fees would be sought if payment of the principal amount was not made within ten days of the receipt of such notice. Copies of the note and notice were attached to the petition as exhibits. The petition prayed for judgment in the amount of $4,312.80 principal, $686.80 attorney’s fees and costs of court. The defendant in his answer admitted execution of the note and receipt of said notice and filed a plea of partial failure of consideration which was later amended. The trial court after a hearing without the intervention of a jury entered judgment for the plaintiff in the amount of $2,849.05 principal and $436.05 attorney’s fees. The defendant excepted to this judgment and to the order of the trial court denying his amended motion for new trial. *Held:*

The defendant having admitted a prima facie case for recovery in the plaintiff, including the allowance of attorney’s fees as provided in the note sued upon, *Bennett v. Bennett,*50 Ga. App. 34 (2) (177 SE 90), and the trial court having granted to the defendant all the relief prayed for in his plea of partial failure of consideration, the judgment entered for the plaintiff was demanded under the record in this case and the trial court did not err in denying the amended motion for new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Frankum, J., concur.*
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 351.87 May Fiscal Service revise, supplement or amend the terms of this offering?

We may revise, supplement or amend the terms of this offering at any time.