alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 161 (Friday, August 21, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42264-42272]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20012]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal Nos. 09-42]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 
601-3740.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittals 09-42 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, and sensitivy of technology.

    Dated: August 12, 2009.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[[Page 42265]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21AU09.047


[[Page 42266]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21AU09.048


[[Page 42267]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21AU09.049


[[Page 42268]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21AU09.050


[[Page 42269]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21AU09.051


[[Page 42270]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21AU09.052


[[Page 42271]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21AU09.053


[[Page 42272]]


BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
[FR Doc. E9-20012 Filed 8-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
40475.

#### EASTERWOOD v. THE STATE.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

The defendant was indicted, tried and convicted of arson. The indictment was returned at the October, 1960 term of court and continued because of illness of the defendant or his counsel at each term of court thereafter until the April, 1963 term when counsel for the defendant was appointed by the court (the employed counsel being hospitalized at such time and the defendant having been informed at the preceding term that no further continuance would be granted). Counsel was appointed two days before the trial. *Held:*

1. The trial judge did not abuse his discretion in overruling the motion for continuance. See *Duke v. State,*104 Ga. App. 494 (122 SE2d 127), and citations.

2. The excerpt from the charge on the subject of alibi, being the same as approved by this court in *Moss v. State,*43 Ga. App. 109 (4) (158 SE 461), shows no error. See also *Eugee v. State,*159 Ga. 604 (13) (126 SE 471).

3. The evidence, while not without some conflict, was sufficient *857to authorize the conviction and the trial court did not err in overruling the defendant’s motion for new trial.

Decided January 20, 1964.

*Earl Staples,*for plaintiff in error.

*Wright Lipford, Solicitor General,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Hall and Bussell, JJ., concur.*
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed July 13, 2016.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D16-518

Lower Tribunal No. 10-26205

________________



### Tenet Hialeah Healthsystem, Inc., a Florida corporation, d/b/a

Hialeah Hospital

, Petitioner,

vs.



### Yailenis Gonzalez and Dunieski Anzon, as parents of Daniela

Anzon, a deceased minor

, Respondents.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade

County, William Thomas

, Judge.

Billing, Cochran, Lyles, Mauro & Ramsey, P.A., and Donna M. Krusbe and

Kenneth W. Morgan, Jr. (West Palm Beach), for petitioner.

Robbins & Reynolds, P.A., and Michael J. Vecchione and Robert A.

Robbins; Carlos O. Fernandez, for respondents.

Before SUAREZ, C.J., and SHEPHERD and SALTER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Tenet Hialeah Healthsystem, Inc., d/b/a Hialeah Hospital, petitions for

certiorari review of orders allowing Yailenis Gonzalez and Dunieski Anzon, asparents of Daniela Anzon, a deceased minor, to amend their complaint to allege

punitive damages in this action for mishandling of the minor’s corpse. This court

may not review an order authorizing a claim for punitive damages beyond

determining whether the trial court followed the procedural requirements. See

Globe Newspaper Co. v. King

, 658 So. 2d 518 (Fla. 1995); Parker, Landeman &

Parker, P.A. v. Riccard

, 871 So. 2d 1043 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Delta Health Grp.,

Inc. v. Jackson

, 798 So. 2d 857 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Munroe Reg’l Health Sys.,

Inc. v. Estate of Gonzales

, 795 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). Accordingly,

because the lower court complied with the procedural requirements in making its

determination in this case, we deny the petition for writ of certiorari.

Petition denied.

2
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

###### Editorial Note on Part 363

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 363 appear at 70 FR 57433, Sept. 30, 2005, 70 FR 57442, Sept. 30, 2005, and 75 FR 70815, Nov. 19, 2010.

#### § 363.132 Can the sale of the zero-percent certificate of indebtedness be suspended?

The Secretary may suspend and rescind the suspension of sales of the zero-percent certificate of indebtedness by announcement at any time.
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2010-NM-257-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
#### Federal Tire Company, Inc. et al. *v.*Wingler, Guardian.

[No. 20,432.

Filed September 23, 1965.]

*Pell & MatcheU,*of Shelbyville, and *Smith & Jones,*of Indianapolis,, for appellants. ..

*Soshniek & Brentoñ,*of Shelbyville, and *Easley, Tip-ton &■ Magnuson,*of Indianapolis, for appellee. . .

Bierly, C. J.

Appellants filed their petition for extension of time in which to file transcript and assignment of errors in this cause on August 9, 1965, which petition 'was granted and appellants were given time to and including March 1,1966.

On September 8, 1965 appellants filed a dismissal of this cause in this court, which bore the stamp of the Clerk of the Shelby Circuit Court and showing appellants’ dismissal thereof filed in said court on August 24, 1965. Appellants assert in said petition that, in this appeal, all matters in controversy have been compromised and settled.

Proof of service of a copy of appellants’ motion to dismiss was acknowledged by appellee on September 8, 1965, and therein consented and agreed to appellants’ motion to dismiss.

Appellants’ motion to dismiss, proof of service by *528appellee acknowledging said motion to dismiss, and consent in said proof to the dismissal of said cause, is now before the court for finding and determination.

AND THE COURT NOW FINDS that said motion to dismiss was filed September 8, 1965; that the written acknowledgment of said motion, with consent to said dismissal, was filed by appellee on said date; and that appellants’ motion to dismiss should be sustained.

Appeal dismissed, with costs charged to appellants.

Note. — Reported in 210 N. E. 3d 258.
HomeInternational Claims and Investment Disputes...Belgium Claims Program

# 									Belgium Claims Program							

Office of the Assistant Legal Adviser for International Claims and Investment Disputes

		Belgium Claims Program Archive		

If you have received a letter from the Government of Belgium regarding payments from the Department of State in connection with your Overseas Social Security Pension, you must forward this correspondence to:

U.S. Department of StateOffice of the Legal AdviserSuite 203, South Building2430 E Street, NWWashington, DC 20037-2851

You must forward the letter by **June 1, 2017** to receive consideration, and you must also include a copy of your driver’s license or passport.

**Please be advised that if the United States Department of State does not receive written responses by June 1, 2017, the United States of America will deem the claim waived and all potential payments will be forfeited.**

If you have any questions, please contact us, using the address above, or by phone at 202-776-8360.

Tags

BelgiumLegal Adviser

Back to Top
HomeUpdates – Office of Overseas Schools...State Magazine: Assisted School AISA celebrates its first graduates

# 									State Magazine: Assisted School AISA celebrates its first graduates							

Office of Overseas Schools

February 17, 2021

Originally published in State Magazine.

*From left: Students Anthony Carrie and Ellie Chester attend their graduation from American International School of Algiers at Embassy Algiers, June 2. Photo by Jessica Lilley*

By Jessica Lilley

This year marks a milestone for the American International School of Algiers (AISA) as the institution celebrates its first cadre of graduating middle schoolers. AISA’s success is a remarkable achievement and demonstrates how the American community in Algiers has thrived since the post became fully accompanied just four years ago.

The first American school in Algiers opened in 1963, just after Algeria won independence from France. The school closed in 1990 at the outbreak of Algeria’s civil war. The poor security situation also meant that Embassy Algiers was an unaccompanied post from 1990 until 2013.

As the country normalized after the end of the war in 2002, diplomatic missions—including the U.S. mission, international corporations, and NGOs—expanded their presence in Algiers. With more expatriates in the capital, there was an increase in demand for English-language schooling options. This need became more pressing after Embassy Algiers opened to some employee family members in 2013.

As the situation in Algeria slowly began to improve, Embassy Algiers and the Office of Overseas Schools began negotiations to open an American school in 2005. There were significant bureaucratic hurdles to overcome, but after 11 years of discussions, the two sides reached an agreement in March 2016.

AISA opened its doors on the site of a picturesque villa in August 2016. Reflecting on the many challenges the school had to overcome, AISA Director Judith Drotar noted that its success was due to the support of the U.S. and Algerian governments, a dedicated staff, and a long line of supporters. One of the many reasons why AISA prides itself on being “the little school that could.”

Education is one of the most important criteria for many families when bidding. AISA offers parents the opportunity to serve in Algiers knowing they can provide their children a genuine American education, one aligned with the common core curriculum used widely throughout the United States. The school offers grades kindergarten through eighth, and this year has an enrollment of 28 students from 13 nationalities.

Sara Chester, the mother of one of this year’s graduating eighth-graders, says their family is thrilled to have chosen AISA.

“AISA helped foster leadership skills and confidence in my daughter and provides students and families with an engaging, caring educational environment,” said Chester.

For more information about AISA, visit their website.

*Jessica Lilly is vice consul at Embassy Algiers.*

Tags

BusinessEducationOverseas SchoolsOverseas Schools Advisory CouncilSchools

Back to Top
HomeBiographies...Rena Bitter

# 				Rena Bitter			

															Assistant Secretary						Bureau of Consular Affairs												

				August 12, 2021 -									Present							

Tags

Bureau of Consular AffairsState Department Official

Back to Top
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2007-3134 

JOSEPH P. CARSON, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, 

Respondent. 

and 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, 

 Intervenor. 

Joseph P. Carson, of Knoxville, Tennessee, pro se. 

Jeffrey A. Gauger, Acting Associate General Counsel, Office of the General 

Counsel, United States Merit Systems Protection Board, of Washington, DC, for 

respondent. With him on the brief were B. Chad Bungard, General Counsel, and Rosa M. 

Koppel, Deputy General Counsel. 

Roger A. Hipp, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United 

States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, for intervenor. With him on the brief 

were Peter D. Keisler, Acting Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and 

Todd M. Hughes, Deputy Director. 

 

David B. Nolan, of Alexandria, Virginia, for amici curiae, P. Jeffrey Black, et al. 

Appealed from: United States Merit Systems Protection Board 
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2007-3134 

JOSEPH P. CARSON, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, 

Respondent. 

and 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, 

Intervenor. 

Judgment 

ON APPEAL from the United States Merit Systems Protection Board

In CASE NO(S). AT1221061125-W-1

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

Per Curiam (RADER, Circuit Judge, PLAGER, Senior Circuit Judge and MOORE, 

Circuit Judge). 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED: November 9, 2007 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

 Jan Horbaly, Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000858346
<NAME> West Coast Realty Investors, Inc.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       2,194,652
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  343,812
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,578,273
<PP&E>                                      48,278,503
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,705,984)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              48,961,501
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,275,359
<BONDS>                                     24,534,813
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        29,280
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,122,049
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                48,961,501
<SALES>                                      1,362,749
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,381,596
<CGS>                                          534,633
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  534,633
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             560,254
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                292,709
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   292,709
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10


</TABLE>
# L_2020419EN.01001201.xml

| 11.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 419/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 419/12

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2020/2022

of 4 December 2020

on the position to be adopted on behalf of the European Union within the EEA Joint Committee concerning an amendment to Annex IV (Energy) to the EEA Agreement

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 194 in conjunction with Article 218(9) thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2894/94 of 28 November 1994 concerning arrangements for implementing the Agreement on the European Economic Area (1), and in particular Article 1(3) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | The Agreement on the European Economic Area (2) (‘the EEA Agreement’) entered into force on 1 January 1994. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The Agreement on the European Economic Area (2) (‘the EEA Agreement’) entered into force on 1 January 1994.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 98 of the EEA Agreement, the EEA Joint Committee may decide to amend Annex IV to the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 98 of the EEA Agreement, the EEA Joint Committee may decide to amend Annex IV to the EEA Agreement.

| (3) | Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1222 (3) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1222 (3) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (4) | Annex IV to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Annex IV to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly.

| (5) | The position of the Union within the EEA Joint Committee should therefore be based on the draft decision of the EEA Joint Committee, |
| --- | --- |

(5)

The position of the Union within the EEA Joint Committee should therefore be based on the draft decision of the EEA Joint Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The position to be adopted, on behalf of the Union, within the EEA Joint Committee on the proposed amendment to Annex IV (Energy) to the EEA Agreement, shall be based on the draft decision of the EEA Joint Committee (4).

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 4 December 2020.

For the Council

The President

M. ROTH

---

(1)  
  OJ L 305, 30.11.1994, p. 6.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3.

2

(3)  Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1222 of 24 July 2015 establishing a guideline on capacity allocation and congestion management (OJ L 197, 25.7.2015, p. 24).

3

(4)  See document ST12929/20 at http://register.consilium.europa.eu

4

---
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 339.4 Exchanges without tax deferral. Exchanges by owners who: ( a ) Report the interest on all of their securities annually for Federal income tax purposes, or
( b ) Who elect to report all such interest in the year of the exchange, or
( c ) Who are tax-exempt under the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 and the regulations issued thereunder,
Will be handled in the same manner and will be governed by the rules prescribed for exchanges under § 339.3. However, the Series H bonds will not bear the legend referred to in § 339.3(b)(5). Any part of the cash adjustment received which represents interest previously reported for Federal income tax purposes need not be accounted for. The Series H bonds may be registered in the name of the owner of the securities submitted in exchange in any authorized form of registration.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Larry G. Gerdes, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Transcend Services, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2007; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: November 14, 2007
| **Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5131**
Hydrogeology and Hydrologic Landscape Regions of Nevada
*By* Douglas K. Maurer, Thomas J. Lopes, Rose L. Medina, and J. LaRue Smith

Prepared in cooperation with the |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|