alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 403.30 Special disposition of perishable goods.

The proceedings to enforce forfeiture of perishable goods shall, as is the case with proceedings to enforce forfeiture of nonperishable goods, be in the nature of proceedings in rem in the United States District Court for the district wherein such seizure is made. When any seized property is liable to perish or become greatly reduced in price or value by keeping, or when it cannot be kept without great expense, the Commissioner or his delegate shall advise the owner, when known, of the seizure thereof. The owner of the seized property may apply to the District Director of the internal revenue district in which the property was seized to examine the property at any time prior to referral of the property to the U.S. Marshal for disposition. If, in the opinion of the Commissioner or his delegate it is necessary that such property be sold to prevent waste or expense, the Commissioner or his delegate shall cause the property to be appraised in accordance with the procedures set forth in § 403.26(a)(2). The owner shall have such property returned to him upon giving a corporate surety bond pursuant to § 403.28 in an amount equal to the appraised value of the property, to abide the final order, decree, or judgment of the court having cognizance of the case. The bond shall be conditioned to pay the amount of the appraised value to the Commissioner or his delegate, the U.S. Marshal, or otherwise, as may be ordered and directed by the court. The bond shall be filed by the Commissioner or his delegate with the U.S. Attorney for the district in which the proceedings may be commenced. If the owner of such property neglects or refuses to give such bond within a reasonable time considering the condition of the property, the Commissioner or his delegate shall request the U.S. Marshal to proceed to sell the property at public sale as soon as practicable and to pay the proceeds of sale, less reasonable costs of the seizure and sale, to the court to abide its final order, decree, or judgment.

(Sec. 7322, 7323, 7324, 68A Stat. 869, 870, as amended; (26 U.S.C. 7322, 7323, 7324))
<TABLE> <S> <C>
   
<ARTICLE>    5   
<LEGEND>   
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION    
EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE SHEET AT 09/30/98 (UNAUDITED)    
AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED 09/30/98    
(UNAUDITED). IT IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE    
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.   
</LEGEND>   
          
<S>		                          			<C>   
<PERIOD-TYPE>		                  	9-MOS   
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>		              	DEC-31-1998   
<PERIOD-END>			                  	SEP-30-1998   
<CASH>					                                 (883)    
<SECURITIES>				                             		0   
<RECEIVABLES>				                             	0   
<ALLOWANCES>				                              	0   
<INVENTORY>					                              	0   
<CURRENT-ASSETS>				                        (883)
<PP&E>					                                31500   
<DEPRECIATION>			                            		0   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>				                       2515617   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>			                 1011797   
<BONDS>					                                  	0   
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>	                      			0   
<PREFERRED>					                               0   
<COMMON>					                              14277   
<OTHER-SE>					                          1489543   
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>		           2515617   
<SALES>					                                  	0   
<TOTAL-REVENUES>	 		                         		0   
<CGS>					                                   		0   
<TOTAL-COSTS>			                             		0   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>				                     1678000   
<LOSS-PROVISION>				                          	0   
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>				                      5025   
<INCOME-PRETAX>				                     (1683025)   
<INCOME-TAX>                              375000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>			                        	0   
<DISCONTINUED>				                            	0   
<EXTRAORDINARY>				                           	0   
<CHANGES>	                                					0   
<NET-INCOME>				                        (2058025)   
<EPS-PRIMARY>				                             	0   
<EPS-DILUTED>			                              	0   
           

</TABLE>
#### § 16.15 Ex parte contacts.

No party or person (except employees of the ALJ's office) shall communicate in any way with the ALJ on any matter at issue in a case, unless on notice and opportunity for all parties to participate. This provision does not prohibit a person or party from inquiring about the status of a case or asking routine questions concerning administrative functions or procedures.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Amendments to International Health Regulations Strengthen Global Pandemic Preparedness

# 									Amendments to International Health Regulations Strengthen Global Pandemic Preparedness							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

June 3, 2024

Late last week in Geneva, the U.S. delegation to the World Health Assembly, led by Secretary of Health and Human Services Xavier Becerra, together with delegates from other WHO-member countries, successfully adopted a number of amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR), the most significant updates to the IHR in nearly 20 years.  These amendments will:
        - Enhance transparency and timeliness of information, and make the global health security architecture stronger overall while maintaining full respect for sovereignty of individual states;
        - Improve access to critical health products, to more equitably prevent, prepare, and respond to pandemic emergencies, regardless of where they arise; and
        - Take steps to better identify and close critical gaps in health security capacities, including through the establishment of an Implementation Committee, to stop outbreaks before they threaten Americans and our security.

These developments will ensure the United States is better prepared to respond to the next international health emergency, demonstrating that countries can come together and tackle global challenges to improve the lives of people around the world and provides momentum for concluding the Pandemic Agreement, which nations agreed to finalize by May 2025.  As the world’s leading foreign assistance donor, the United States commitment to health and health security is unmatched. The United States has pledged $700 million to the new Pandemic Fund and believes in its mission to provide a dedicated stream of additional, long-term financing to strengthen core capacities in low- and middle-income countries.

For media inquiries, please contact GHSD_publicaffairs@state.gov.

Tags

Bureau of Global Health Security and DiplomacyGlobal HealthHealth and Medical CooperationHealth InformationOffice of the SpokespersonSecurity

Back to Top
#### Joe V. GONZALEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dale PATRICK; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-15809.

D.C. No. CV-99-05622-OWW/DLB.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 10, 2002.*

Decided June 17, 2002.

*326Before O’SCANNLAIN, BERZON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Federal prisoner Joe Gonzalez appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment in favor of prison officials in his retaliation action brought pursuant to *Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,*403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the summary judgment, *Margolis v. Ryan,*140 F.3d 850, 852 (9th Cir.1998), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Gonzalez failed to present evidence sufficient to demonstrate a triable issue of material fact regarding whether defendants’ actions were in retaliation for Gonzalez exercising his constitutional rights. *See Barnett v. Centoni,*31 F.3d 813, 815-16 (9th Cir.1994) (per curiam).

Gonzalez’s contention that defendants admitted to retaliatory acts by failing to respond to his Request for Admissions lacks merit because defendants responded by objecting that the Request was untimely under the March 13, 2000 scheduling order. *See*Fed.R.Civ.P. 36(a).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
ex10-7.htm


Exhibit 10.7


 


 



Amendment to License Agreement


 


 


This amendment is to the original LICENSE AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) dated as of January 11, 2012 (the “Effective Date”) and entered into between PositiveID Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“PSID”), and VeriTeQ Acquisition Corporation, a Florida corporation (“VeriTeQ”).


 


The parties intend to make an amendment to the Agreement to convert the license from a non-exclusive license to an exclusive license, subject to VeriTeQ meeting certain minimum royalty requirements in the future.


 


The amendments to the Agreement are as follows:


 



	
  

	
1.

	
Paragraph D shall be amended to strike the word “non-exclusive” and replace with the word “exclusive, subject to the minimum royalty requirements in Section 3.4.” All other wording in this paragraph remains unchanged.







 



	
  

	
2.

	
Section 2.1(a) shall be amended to strike the word “non-exclusive” and replace with the word “exclusive, subject to the minimum royalty requirements in Section 3.4.” All other wording in this section remains unchanged.







 



	
  

	
3.

	
Section 3.4 shall be added to the Agreement and it shall read: “the exclusivity under this license is subject to VeriTeQ meeting certain minimum annual royalty requirements as follows:







 




	
Year

	
Min Royalty


	
2013

	
$400,000


	
2014

	
$800,000


	
2015 and thereafter

	
$1,600,000









 



	
  

	
4.

	
Section 12.14 shall be added to the Agreement and it shall read:  “In the event PositiveID has a petition in bankruptcy filed for or against it, the “Patent Rights” and “PositiveID technology” referenced herein shall transfer to Licensee.  Licensee will own the patent rights and PositiveID technology referenced in the Agreement with full title and free and clear of any and all claims, liabilities, obligations or setoffs.”







 


All other terms of the Agreement not specifically amended herein shall remain as originally written.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement to be effective as of the date first written in the original LICENSE AGREEMENT of January 11, 2012.


 


 




	
POSITIVEID CORPORATION

	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	
By:

	
/s/William Caragol

	 	 
	Name:	
William Caragol

	 	 
	Title:	
Chief Executive Officer

	 	 
	Date:	
June 26, 2012

	 	 







 










	
VERITEQ ACQUISITION CORPORATION

	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	
By: 

	
/s/Scott R. Silverman

	 	 
	Name:	
Scott R. Silverman

	 	 
	Title:	
Chief Executive Officer

	 	 
	Date:	
June 26, 2012
HomeU.S. APEC 2023 Host Year...APEC 2023 Media Toolkit

# 									APEC 2023 Media Toolkit							

March 16, 2023

**APEC 2023 LOGO DESIGN MOTIVATION/INTENT        **

The APEC Forum logo represents the convergence of APEC member economies in a yearlong forum across the United States in Palm Springs, Detroit, Seattle, and San Francisco. 2023 marks the 30th Anniversary of the APEC collaboration, and so the logo’s inspiration draws on previous host-economies logos to represent the lasting partnership between the member economies to advance key initiatives such as economy, business, and climate.

Two shapes form a suspension bridge tower, referring specifically to the city of San Francisco, the host city for APEC Economic Leaders’ Week at the end of the year. More broadly, the bridge represents a steady, positive connection between the member economies around the Pacific Rim. The apex, the highest melting point of two separate paths, symbolizes the historic cooperation and collaboration between member economies.

By design, the icon’s simple geometry pairs seamlessly with the skylines of each host city to create additional city-specific logos. These logos create a stronger visual narrative between Forum events and the diversity of host locations across the U.S. Overall, the bridge’s apex and colors represent APEC’s goal towards a stronger, more balanced, secure, sustainable, and inclusive future.

##### *To Download Content, Go To Right Click > Save Image As.**If you find your file is downloading as an .AVIF, just go to Export > .JPEG*.

### Style Guide

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

page 5

### Logo Images

#### Main Logo

white, with no gradient

blue, with no gradient

white with gradient

blue with gradient

#### Seattle Logo

white, with no gradient

blue, with no gradient

white with gradient

blue with gradient

#### Palm Springs Logo

white, with no gradient

blue, with no gradient

white with gradient

blue with gradient

#### Detroit Logo

white, with no gradient

blue, with no gradient

white with gradient

blue with gradient

#### San Francisco Logo

white, with no gradient

blue, with no gradient

white with gradient

blue with gradient

### Zoom Backdrop

zoom backdrop

Back to Top
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2550

To prohibit the use of funds appropriated to the Department of Defense

from being used for the deployment on the ground of United States

Armed Forces in the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina as part of

any peacekeeping operation, or as part of any implementation force,

unless such deployment is specifically authorized by law.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 26, 1995

Mr. HEFLEY (for himself, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. SOLOMON, Mr. COX of

California, Mr. BROWNBACK, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Mr. STEARNS, Mr.

DREIER, Mr. BAKER of California, Mr. FUNDERBURK, Mr. ROYCE, Mr.

METCALF, Mr. HERGER, Mr. CHRISTENSEN, Mr. STUMP, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. NETHERCUTT, Mr. ROTH, Mrs. MEYERS of Kansas,

Mr. NEUMANN, Mr. BONILLA, Mrs. CUBIN, Mr. KLECZKA, Mr. DORNAN,

Mr. CHABOT, Mrs. SEASTRAND, Mr. RADANOVICH, Mr. MANZULLO, Mr.

BURTON of Indiana, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. LAHOOD, Mr. WATTS of Oklahoma, Mr. GEKAS, Mr. SANFORD, Mr. ENGLISH of Pennsylvania, Mr.

HUNTER, Mr. SALMON, Mrs. CHENOWETH, Mr. TAYLOR of North Carolina, Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, Mr. LARGENT, Mr. PETERSON of

Minnesota, Mr. PACKARD, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mr. MOORHEAD,

Mr. MCKEON, Mr. KIM, Mr. RIGGS, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. BONO, Mr.

KNOLLENBERG, Mr. UPTON, Mr. MCINNIS, Mr. BUYER, Mr. ISTOOK, Mr.

HORN, Mr. BUNNING of Kentucky, Ms. DUNN of Washington, Mr. CALVERT, and Mr. FORBES) introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on National Security, and in addition to the Committee

on International Relations, for a period to be subsequently determined by

the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To prohibit the use of funds appropriated to the Department

of Defense from being used for the deployment on the
2

•HR 2550 IH

ground of United States Armed Forces in the Republic

of Bosnia and Herzegovina as part of any peacekeeping

operation, or as part of any implementation force, unless

such deployment is specifically authorized by law.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF USE ON DEPARTMENT OF DE4 FENSE FUNDS FOR DEPLOYMENT ON THE

5 GROUND OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES

6 IN THE REPUBLIC OF BOSNIA AND

7 HERZEGOVINA AS PART OF ANY PEACEKEEP8 ING OPERATION OR IMPLEMENTATION

9 FORCE.

10 None of the funds appropriated or otherwise available

11 to the Department of Defense may be obligated or ex12 pended for the deployment on the ground of United States

13 Armed Forces in the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina

14 as part of any peacekeeping operation, or as part of any

15 implementation force, unless the deployment is specifically

16 authorized by a law enacted after the date of the enact17 ment of this Act.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 .
  1.
    
    the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the
periods presented in the Form 10-Q.
 Date:  November 14, 2008
    /s/ C. Brett BurfordC. BRETT BURFORDChief Financial Officer 4
#### People of Puerto Rico, Plaintiff and Appellee, *v.*José Cintrón Rodríguez, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 6718.

Argued November 2, 1937.

Decided November 23, 1937.

*Gelpí & Gelpí*for appellant. *B. A. Gómez, Prosecuting Attorney,*and *Luis Janer, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney,*for appellee.

*323Mr. Justice Hutchison

delivered the opinion of the Court.

 Section *4*of an Act approved July 17, 1935 (Special Session Laws, pp. 152, 154), reads as follows:

> “Every person caught carrying or conveying any slip of paper, note, ticket, notebook, list of numbers, or implements, knowing that the same are used for the illegal games of *‘bolita,’, ‘boli-pool’,*clandestine combinations related to the *pools*of the hippodromes of Puerto Rico, and clandestine lotteries; . . . shall be immediately arrested. .. *”*

José Cintron Rodriguez was convicted of a violation of this section. The only error assigned goes to the overruling of a demurrer to the complaint filed by a district chief of police. The contention is that the complaint charged more than one offense. The pertinent portion of the complaint is that defendant carried upon his person certain “lottery and *boli-pool”*tickets and stubs, more particularly described as: 29 tickets printed on yellow paper bearing specified numbers—each ticket being divided into two sections or coupons—and 34 tickets printed on blue paper bearing specified numbers—each ticket being divided into two sections or ocupons—and other specified numbers, each divided into five sections or coupons and stubs of the same colors,—-that they were being used in prohibited games, clandestine combinations, the playing of which is unlawful, that they Were for sale at five cents each to purchasers who would pay or promise to pay that amount upon the understanding that they would have a chance to obtain a prize which in this lottery amounted to $100 and upon the understanding that the winner would be the person who by chance should draw the number corresponding to the last three digits of the number in dollars as announced by radio representing the capital prize in the drawing of November 10, 1935, in the Nlational Lottery of the Dominican Republic which constituted a dis-' tribution of money in a prohibited game connected with the practice of clandestine combinations, in violation of section 4 of Act No. 25, approved July 17, 1935.

*324The complaint did not charge more than one offense. The words “or *boU-pool”*may be regarded as surplusage. The context, makes it reasonably clear that the tickets were clandestine lottery tickets, or, more specifically, tickets used in that form of clandestine lottery known as policy or “bolita”. We have heretofore repeatedly held that the rules governing indictments and informations will not be rigidly enforced when invoked as applicable to an ordinary complaint.

The judgment appealed from must be affirmed.

Mr. Justice Córdova Dávila took no part in the decision of this case.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

TRAVIS LEE KENDRICK,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-559 

[November 22, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Krista Marx, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2016-CF008285-

AXXX-MB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and David John McPherrin, 

Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

GERBER, C.J., LEVINE and FORST, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### § 129.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to provide general information on portfolio investment survey data collection programs and analyses under the International Investment and Trade in Services Survey Act ((formerly the International Investment Survey Act of 1976) (the “Act”)). The purpose of the Act is to provide for the collection of comprehensive and reliable information concerning international investment, including portfolio investment. The Act specifies that regular data collection programs and surveys specified by the Act or deemed necessary by the Secretary of the Treasury shall be conducted to secure information on international capital flows and other information related to international portfolio investment, including information that may be necessary for computing and analyzing the United States balance of payments.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 359.14 How are composite rates determined?

Composite rates are set according to the following formula (See appendix A to part 359 for examples of calculations involving composite interest rates.):

Composite rate = {(Fixed rate ÷ 2) + Semiannual inflation rate + [Semiannual inflation rate × (Fixed rate ÷ 2)]} × 2.[2]

###### Footnotes -
  359.14

[2] Example for I bonds issued May 2002-October 2002:

Fixed rate = 2.00%

Inflation rate = 0.28%

Composite rate = [0.0200 ÷ 2 + 0.0028 + (0.0028 × 0.0200 ÷ 2)] × 2

Composite rate = [0.0100 + 0.0028 + 0.000028] × 2

Composite rate = 0.012828 × 2

Composite rate = 0.025656

Composite rate = 0.0257 (rounded)

Composite rate = 2.57% (rounded)
EX-10.31



 Exhibit 10.31 

 

			
		  	 AMENDMENT NO. 7, dated as of January 02, 2012, to that Employment Agreement dated November 1, 2004 (the “Agreement”) by and
between KEVIN HYSON (the “Executive”) and AMERICAN MEDIA OPERATIONS, INC. (the “Company”).


 Effective as of the date first written above, the Agreement is hereby amended as follows: 

1. Paragraph 1a of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted and the following substituted therefore: 

Employment Term. The Company shall employ Executive until March 31, 2013 (the “Employment Term”) on
the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Agreement. The Agreement shall be considered effective as of November 1 2004 (the “Effective Time”). 

All other terms and conditions of Your Employment Agreement and any subsequent amendments of that Employment Agreement shall remain in
full force and effect (unless modified above). 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment
No. 7 as of the date first written above. 
  

			
	AMERICAN MEDIA OPERATIONS, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Daniel Rotstein


  

	
	/s/ Kevin Hyson
	Kevin Hyson