Appendices A–J

 Final

Environmental Impact Statement for

Implementation of 

2005 Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) 

Recommendations and Related Army Actions at

Fort Belvoir, Virginia

prepared by

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Mobile District

with Technical Assistance from

Tetra Tech, Inc.

Fairfax, Virginia 22030

June 2007
Final Environmental Impact Statement 

Fort Belvoir, Virginia June 2007 

Appendix-i

APPENDIX CONTENTS 

Appendix A – Notice of Intent to Prepare Environmental Impact Statements 

Appendix B – Agency Coordination and Public Meetings 

B.1 – Agency Coordination 

B.2 – Scope of Statement (July 2006) 

B.3 – Public Information Meeting (January 2007) Summary Report 

B.4 – DEIS Public Meeting (April 2007) Presentation Materials and 

Attendee Sheets 

Appendix C – Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) Consistency Determination 

for Proposed BRAC Implementation at Fort Belvoir 

Appendix D – Transportation Supporting Documentation 

Appendix E – Air Quality Supporting Documentation 

 E.1 – Draft General Conformity Determination 

 E.2 – Vehicle Microscale CO Concentration Modeling 

 E.3 – Criteria Air Pollutants—Sources and Impacts 

 E.4 – Permitted Sources of Air Emissions—Potential–to–emit 

Calculations 

E.5 – Draft Construction Performance Plan for the Reduction of Air 

Emissions 

Appendix F – Storm Water and Watershed Modeling Methodology 

Appendix G – Economic Impact Forecast System (EIFS) Analysis and 

Population Estimations 

 G.1 – EIFS Model Analysis for Fort Belvoir, Virginia 

 G.2 – Population Estimate Calculations 

Appendix H – Off-Post Cumulative Projects List 

Appendix I – GSA Parcel Feasibility Study 

Appendix J – Project Footprint Impact Maps 

Appendix K – Comments Received on Draft EIS and Responses (in separate 

volume) 
Final Environmental Impact Statement 

Fort Belvoir, Virginia June 2007 

Appendix-ii

This page is intentionally left blank. 
Final Environmental Impact Statement 

Fort Belvoir, Virginia June 2007 

A-1

Appendix A 

Intent to Prepare Environmental Impact Statements for 

Realignment Actions Resulting from the 2005 Base Closure and 

Realignment Commission’s Recommendations 
Final Environmental Impact Statement 

Fort Belvoir, Virginia June 2007 

A-2

This page is intentionally left blank. 
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 23, 2005 / Notices 70793 

ROUTINE USES OF RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE

SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATEGORIES OF USERS AND

THE PURPOSES OF SUCH USES: 

In addition to those disclosures 

generally permitted under 5 U.S.C. 

552a(b) of the Privacy Act, these records 

or information contained therein may 

specifically be disclosed outside the 

DoD as a routine use pursuant to 5 

U.S.C. 552a(b)(3) as follows: The 

‘Blanket Routine Uses’ published at the 

beginning of the Air Force’s compilation 

of record system notices apply to this 

system. 

POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR STORING, 

RETRIEVING, ACCESSING, RETAINING, AND

DISPOSING OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM: 

STORAGE: 

Maintained in file folders, note books/ 

binders, in computers and on computer 

output products. 

RETRIEVABILITY: 

Retrieved by name, Social Security 

Number and detachment number. 

SAFEGUARDS: 

Records are accessed by person(s) 

responsible for servicing the record 

system in performance of their official 

duties and by authorized personnel who 

are properly screened and cleared for 

need-to-know. records are stored in 

locked rooms and cabinets. Those in 

computer storage devices are protected 

by computer system software. 

RETENTION AND DISPOSAL: 

Records at unit of assignment are 

destroyed one year after acceptance of 

commission or one year after 

disenrollment. Records at HQ AFROTC 

for disenrolled cadets are destroyed 

after three years. Computer records are 

destroyed when no longer needed. 

Records are destroyed by tearing into 

pieces, shredding, pulping, macerating 

or burning. Computer records are 

destroyed by erasing, deleting or 

overwriting. 

SYSTEM MANAGER(S) AND ADDRESS: 

Director of Senior Program, Air Force 

Reserve Officer Training Corps, 551 East 

Maxwell Boulevard, Maxwell Air Force 

Base, AL 36112–6110, and Commander 

of appropriate AFROTC detachment. 

Official mailing addresses are 

published as an appendix to the Air 

Force’s compilation of systems of 

records notices. 

NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE: 

Individuals seeking to determine 

whether this system of records contains 

information on them should address 

inquiries to the AFROTC Detachment 

Commander at location of assignment. 

Official mailing addresses are published 

as an appendix to the Air Force’s 

compilation of system of records 

notices. 

Request for information involving an 

investigation for disenrollment should 

be addressed to Commander, Air Force 

Reserve Officer Training Corps, 551 East 

Maxwell Boulevard, Maxwell Air Force 

Base, AL 36112–6110. Requests should 

include full name and SSN. 

RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES: 

Individuals seeking to access records 

about themselves contained in this 

system should address requests to the 

AFROTC Detachment Commander at 

location of assignment. Official mailing 

addresses are published as an appendix 

to the Air Force’s compilation of 

systems of records notices. 

Request for information involving an 

investigation for disenrollment should 

be addressed to Commander, Air Force 

Reserve Officer Training Corps, 551 East 

Maxwell Boulevard, Maxwell Air Force 

Base, AL 36112–6110. Requests should 

include full name and SSN. 

CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES: 

The Air Force rules for accessing 

records, and for contesting contents and 

appealing initial agency determinations 

are published in Air Force Instruction 

33–332; 32 CFR part 806b; or may be 

obtained from the system manager. 

RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES: 

Sources of records in the system are 

educational institutions, secondary and 

higher learning; government agencies; 

civilian authorities; financial 

institutions; previous employer; 

individual recommendations, 

interviewing officers; and civilian 

medical authorities. 

EXEMPTIONS CLAIMED FOR THE SYSTEM: 

Portions of this system may be exempt 

under the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 

552a(k)(5), as applicable, but only to the 

extent that disclosure would reveal the 

identity of a confidential source. 

Parts of this system may be exempt 

pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(5), but only 

to the extent that disclosure would 

reveal the identity of a confidential 

source. 

[FR Doc. 05–23131 Filed 11–22–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Department of the Army 

Intent To Prepare Environmental 

Impact Statements for Realignment 

Actions Resulting From the 2005 Base 

Closure and Realignment 

Commission’s Recommendations 

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD. 

ACTION: Notice of intent. 

SUMMARY: The Defense Base Closure and 

Realignment (BRAC) Commissions were 

established by Public Law 101–510, the 

Defense Base Closure and Realignment 

Act of 1990 (BRAC Law), to recommend 

military installations for realignment 

and closure. The 2005 Commission’s 

recommendations were included in a 

report which was presented to the 

President on September 8, 2005. The 

President approved and forwarded this 

report to Congress on September 16, 

2005. Since a joint resolution to 

disapprove these recommendations did 

not occur within the statutorily 

provided time period, these 

recommendations have become law and 

must be implemented in accordance 

with the requirements of the BRAC Law. 

The BRAC Law exempts the decisionmaking process of the Commission from 

the provisions of the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA). The Law also relieves the 

Department of Defense from the NEPA 

requirement to consider the need for 

closing, realigning, or transferring 

functions and from looking at 

alternative installations to close or 

realign. Nonetheless, the Department of 

the Army must still prepare 

environmental impact analyses during 

the process of property disposal, and 

during the process of relocating 

functions from a military installation 

being closed or realigned to another 

military installation after the receiving 

installation has been selected but before 

the functions are relocated. These 

analyses will include consideration of 

the direct and indirect environmental 

and socioeconomic effects of these 

actions and the cumulative impacts of 

other reasonably foreseeable actions 

affecting the installations. 

The Department of the Army intends 

to prepare individual Environmental 

Impact Statements (EIS) pursuant to 

section 102(2)(C) of NEPA, regulations 

of the Council on Environmental 

Quality (40 CFR 1500–1508), and the 

Army NEPA regulation (32 CFR 651 et 

seq.) for each of the actions listed below. 

Opportunities for public participation 

will be announced in the respective 

local newspapers. The public will be 

70794 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 23, 2005 / Notices 

invited to participate in scoping 

activities for each EIS and comments 

from the public will be considered 

before any action is taken to implement 

these actions. 

Environmental Impact Statements are 

planned for each of the following 

realignment actions: 

a. Fort Meade, Maryland. The BRAC 

realignment action will co-locate and 

consolidate Department of Defense 

information and information technology 

missions at Fort Meade. 

(1) EIS alternatives could include 

evaluating siting locations for structures 

and related projects within Fort Meade 

that involve new building construction 

only or new building construction 

combined with renovation of existing 

facilities. The alternatives would 

evaluate areas to provide for 

construction of, but not be limited to, 

six to eight 4-story administration 

buidlings, a full day care child 

development center, a standard-design 

Whole Barracks Complex, and a 

physical fitness center. 

(2) The proposed BRAC action may 

have significant environmental impacts 

due to the infrastructure and facilities 

construction that will be required to 

accommodate an estimated increase of 

over 5,500 personnel. Significant issues 

to be analyzed in the EIS may include 

potential impacts to air quality from 

increased vehicle emissions, installation 

and regional traffic increases, land use 

changes, natural resources, water use, 

solid waste, cultural resources, and 

cumulative impacts from increased 

burdens to the facility based on 

projected growth. 

b. Aberdeen Proving Ground (APG), 

Maryland. APG will be receiving 

numerous Army, Navy and Air Force 

activities to transform it into a full 

spectrum research, development, 

acquisition center for Command, 

Control, Communications, Computers, 

Intelligence, Surveillance, and 

Reconnaissance (C4ISR) Defense 

Chemical and Biological Systems. The 

Army Test and Evaluation Command 

Headquarters and Civilian Personnel 

Offices will also be consolidated at 

APG. 

(1) Alternatives to be examined in the 

EIS could include alternative 

distribution of new activities between 

APG and the Edgewood Area for 

military field training exercises; 

alternative siting schemes for placement 

of buildings and related infrastructure to 

accommodate an increase of about 

15,000 Army personnel within the APG 

and Edgewood Area. These may include 

siting schemes for new building 

construction only, or new building 

construction combined with renovation 

of existing facilities. 

(2) The proposed BRAC action may 

have significant environmental impacts 

due to the large amount of infrastructure 

and facilities construction that will be 

required to accommodate an increase of 

personnel and military training 

operations. Significant issues to be 

analyzed in the EIS will include on-post 

and local air quality conditions, on-post 

and regional traffic conditions, housing, 

socioeconomics, noise due to increased 

vehicle use, threatened and endangered 

species to include bald eagle habitat, 

historic buildings and archeological 

resources, wetlands, biological 

resources, land use, and community 

facilities and services. 

c. Fort Belvoir, Virginia. Fort Belvoir 

will be receiving numerous Department 

of Defense activities from leased space 

within the National Capital Region 

(NCR); National Geospatial Intelligence 

Agency units from various NCR leased 

locations and Bethesda, Maryland; 

primary and secondary medical care 

functions from Walter Reed Medical 

Center to a new, expanded DeWitt Army 

Hospital; and inventory control point 

functions for consumable items to the 

Defense Logistics Agency from the 

Naval Support Activist, Mechanisburg 

and Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, 

Ohio. 

(1) EIS alternatives may consist of 

moving all activities to the Fort Belvoir 

Main Post, moving all activities to the 

Engineer Proving Ground (EPG), or 

moving a portion of the activities to the 

Main Point and a portion to the EPG. 

Other alternatives could include 

alternative land locations for specific 

projects within Fort Belvoir, within the 

EPG, or a combination of both; new 

construction only; new construction 

combined with renovation of existing 

facilities; alternative facility siting 

schemes, or other modifications of 

specific projects. 

(2) The proposed BRAC action may 

have significant environmental impacts 

due to the large amount of infrastructure 

and facilities construction that will be 

required to accommodate an estimated 

increase of over 18,000 personnel. 

Significant issues to be analyzed in the 

EIS will include potential impacts to air 

quality condition in the Northern 

Virginia region, transportation systems 

in the Northern Virginia region, traffic 

conditions with Fort Belvoir, threatened 

and endangered species, historic 

buildings and archeological resources, 

wetlands, biological resources, land use, 

and community facilities and services. 

d. Fort Lee, Virginia. Fort Lee will 

receive the Transportation Center and 

School from Fort Eustis, Virginia, and 

the Ordnance Center and School from 

Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland. 

These functions will be consolidated 

with the Quartermaster Center and 

School, the Army Logistics Management 

College, and Combined Arms Support 

Command to establish a Combat Service 

Support Center at Fort Lee. 

(1) Alternatives to be examined in the 

EIS may include the usage of only Fort 

Lee for field training exercises, the 

usage of other military installations 

(Fort A.P. Hill) for field training 

exercises, or a combination of both; 

alternative land locations for specific 

projects with Fort Lee and Fort A.P. 

Hill; new construction only; new 

construction combined with renovation 

of existing facilities; alternative facility 

siting schemes, or other modifications of 

specific projects. 

(2) The proposed BRAC action may 

have significant environmental impacts 

due to the large amount of infrastructure 

and facilities construction that will be 

required to accommodate an estimated 

increase of over 7,000 personnel. 

Significant issues to be analyzed in the 

EIS will include air quality conditions, 

traffic conditions, noise due to 

increased training activities, threatened 

and endangered species, historic 

buildings and archeological resources, 

wetlands, biological resources, land use, 

and community facilities and services. 

e. Fort Benning, Georgia. Fort Benning 

will receive the Armor Center and 

School from Fort Knox, Kentucky; 81st 

Regional Readiness Center from Fort 

Gillem, Georgia; and the U.S. Army 

Reserve Center from Columbus, Georgia. 

(1) Alternatives to be examined by the 

EIS may consist of alternative siting 

locations with Fort Benning for facility 

construction projects, new construction 

only, renovation and use of existing 

facilities, or a combination of both new 

construction and use of existing 

facilities, and usage of alternatives land 

locations within Fort Benning for 

training activities. 

(2) As a result of new construction 

and training activities associated with 

moving nearly 10,000 personnel to Fort 

Benning, the BRAC action has the 

potential to cause significant 

environmental impacts to threatened 

and endangered species such as the redcockaded woodpecker, archeological 

sites, wetlands, soil erosion, and 

increased noise impacts to the 

surrounding public. 

f. Fort Sam Houston, Texas. Navy and 

Air Force medical training activities 

from various locations within the U.S. 

and the 59th Medical Wing from 

Lackland Air Force Base, Texas, will 

move to Fort Sam Houston to form a 

Department of Defense medical training 

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 23, 2005 / Notices 70795 

center. The Army Installation 

Management Agency (IMA) 

Headquarters from Virginia, the 

Northwest IMA Regional office from 

Illinois, and the Army Environmental 

Center from Maryland will also move to 

Fort Sam Houston. 

(1) Alternatives to be examined in the 

EIS could consist of alternative 

locations within Fort Sam Houston for 

siting facility construction, new 

construction only, renovation and use of 

existing facilities (to include historic 

buildings), or a combination of both 

new construction and use of existing 

facilities, and usage of alternative 

locations within Camp Bullis, a sub-post 

of Fort Sam Houston, for training 

activities. 

(2) As a result of moving 

approximately 9,000 new personnel to 

Fort Sam Houston and associated new 

construction, renovation and training 

activities, implementing the proposed 

BRAC action could have potential 

significant impacts to traffic on and off 

post, air quality and historic properties, 

to include contributing elements of the 

Fort Sam Houston National Historic 

Landmark District. 

g. Fort Carson, Colorado. Fort Carson 

will receive a Heavy Brigade Combat 

team and a Unit of Employment 

Headquarters from Fort Hood, Texas, 

and the inpatient care services from the 

U.S. Air Force Academy, Colorado. 

Another Infantry Brigade Combat Team 

from overseas could also be transferred 

to Fort Carson as a result of the BRAC 

recommendation. 

(1) Alternatives that may be 

considered in the Fort Carson EIS could 

include phasing movement of units to 

the fort, alternative siting locations 

within the post of placement of new 

facilities, construction of only new 

facilities, utilization and renovation of 

existing facilities, a combination of new 

construction and utilization of existing 

facilities, and utilization of alternative 

locations within Fort Carson for training 

activities. 

(2) Fort Carson will gain 

approximately 10,000 Army personnel 

as a result of the BRAC action. 

Construction of new facilities, 

renovation of existing infrastructure and 

additional training activities could have 

significant environmental impacts on 

Fort Carson and its environs. Impacts 

could concur to local air and water 

quality, archaeological resources, noise 

and traffic. 

h. Pinion Canyon Maneuver Site, 

Colorado. Pinion Canyon Maneuver Site 

(PCMS) is a subpost of Fort Carson and 

a primary training area for units 

stationed at Fort Carson and other Army 

posts. The new combat units stationed 

at Fort Carson will increase the training 

tempo at the PCMS. 

(1) The EIS to be prepared for the 

PCMS will examine a number of 

implementation alternatives that could 

include alternative placement of new 

construction projects, alternative 

locations within the PCMS for training 

activities, and alternative timing for 

units to conduct training activities at the 

PCMS. 

(2) The Fort Carson BRAC action has 

the potential to significantly impact 

natural resources at the PCMS since the 

approximately 10,000 new personnel to 

be stationed there will now be training 

at the PCMS on a regular basis. New 

construction and increased training 

activities at the PCMS could have an 

impact on archaeological resources, 

natural resources, air and water quality, 

and soil erosion. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Public Affairs Office of the affected 

installations or the appropriate higher 

headquarters as indicated: (1) Fort 

Meade, MD—(301) 677–1301; (2) 

Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD—(410) 

278–1147; (3) Fort Belvoir, VA—(703) 

805–2583; (4) Fort Lee, VA—(804) 734–

6862; (5) Fort Benning, GA—(706) 545–

3438; (6) Fort Sam Houston, TX—(210) 

221–1099; (7) Fort Carson and Pinion 

Canyon Maneuver Site, CO—(910) 396–

2122/5600. 

Dated: November 18, 2005. 

Addison D. Davis IV, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army 

(Environment, Safety and Occupational 

Health), OASA(I&E). 

[FR Doc. 05–23162 Filed 11–22–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3710–08–M 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Defense Logistics Agency 

Privacy Act of 1974; Systems of 

Records 

AGENCY: Defense Logistics Agency. 

ACTION: Notice to add a system of 

records. 

SUMMARY: The Defense Logistics Agency 

proposes to add a system of records 

notice to its inventory of record systems 

subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 

U.S.C. 552a), as amended. 

DATES: This action will be effective 

without further notice on December 23, 

2005 unless comments are received that 

would result in a contrary 

determination. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the 

Privacy Act Officer, Headquarters, 

Defense Logistics Agency, ATTN: DP, 

8725 John J. Kingman Road, Stop 2533, 

Fort Belvoir, VA 22060–6221. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Susan Salus at (703) 767–6183. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Defense Logistics Agency notices for 

systems of records subject to the Privacy 

Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, 

have been published in the Federal 

Register and are available from the 

address above. 

The proposed system report, as 

required by 5 U.S.C. 552a(r) of the 

Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, was 

submitted on October 5, 2005, to the 

House Committee on Government 

Reform, the Senate Committee on 

Homeland Security and Governmental 

Affairs, and the Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB) pursuant to 

paragraph 4c of Appendix I to OMB 

Circular No. A–130, ‘Federal Agency 

Responsibilities for Maintaining 

Records About Individuals,’ dated 

February 8, 1996 (February 20, 1996, 61 

FR 6427). 

Dated: November 17, 2005. 

L.M. Bynum, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, 

Department of Defense. 

SYSTEM NAME: 

Information Technology Access and 

Control Records. 

SYSTEM LOCATION: 

Director, Information Operations, 

Headquarters Defense Logistics Agency, 

ATTN: J–6, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, 

Stop 6226, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060–

6221, and the Defense Logistics Agency 

field activities. Official mailing 

addresses are published as an appendix 

to DLA’s compilation of systems of 

records notices. 

CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS COVERED BY THE

SYSTEM: 

Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) 

civilian and military personnel, 

contractor employees, and individuals 

requiring access to DLA-controlled 

networks, computer systems, and 

databases. 

CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM: 

System contains documents relating 

to requests for and grants of access to 

DLA computer networks, systems, or 

databases. The records contain the 

individual’s name; social security 

number; citizenship; physical and 

electronic addresses; work telephone 

numbers; office symbol; contractor/ 

employee status; computer logon 

addresses, passwords, and user 

identification codes; type of access/ 

permissions required; verification of 

need to know; dates of mandatory 

Final Environmental Impact Statement 

Fort Belvoir, Virginia June 2007 

B-1

Appendix B 

Agency Coordination and Public Meetings 

B.1 – Agency Coordination 

B.2 – Scope of Statement (July 2006)

B.3 – Public Information Meeting (January 2007) Summary Report 

B.4 – DEIS Public Meeting (April 2007) Presentation Materials 

and Attendee Sheets
Final Environmental Impact Statement 

Fort Belvoir, Virginia June 2007 

B-2

This page is intentionally left blank. 
Final Environmental Impact Statement 

Fort Belvoir, Virginia June 2007 

B.1-1

APPENDIX B.1 

AGENCY COORDINATION 
Final Environmental Impact Statement 

Fort Belvoir, Virginia June 2007 

B.1-2

This page is intentionally left blank. 




2005 BRAC Recommendations for Fort Belvoir, Virginia 

The BRAC Commission made 35 recommendations concerning Fort Belvoir. The essence of each 

recommendation is outlined below. 

Realign Fort Belvoir, VA by relocating and consolidating Sensors, Electronics, and Electronic Warfare 

Research, Development and Acquisition activities to Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD except the Night 

Vision and Electronic Sensors Directorate (the Night Vision Lab) and the Project Manager Night 

Vision/Reconnaissance, Surveillance and Target Acquisition (PM NV/RSTA), and by relocating and 

consolidating Information Systems Research and Development and Acquisition (except for the Program 

Executive Office, Enterprise Information Systems) to Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD. 

Realign the PM Acquisition, Logistics and Technology Enterprise Systems and Services (ALTESS) 

facility at 2511 Jefferson Davis Hwy, Arlington, VA, a leased installation, by relocating and consolidating 

into the Program Executive Office, Enterprise Information Systems at Fort Belvoir, VA. 

Realign Fort Belvoir, VA, by relocating Army Prime Power School training to Fort Leonard Wood, MO. 

Realign Fort Belvoir, VA, by relocating the Army Criminal Investigation Command (CID) to Marine 

Corp Base Quantico, VA. 

Realign Ballston Metro Center, a leased installation in Arlington, VA, by relocating the U.S. Army Legal 

Agency to Fort Belvoir, VA. 

Close 1500 Wilson Boulevard and Presidential Towers, leased installations in Arlington, VA, by 

relocating offices accommodating Pentagon Renovation temporary space to Fort Belvoir, VA. 

Close Metro Park III and IV (6350 and 6359 Walker Lane), a leased installation in Alexandria, VA, by 

relocating the Defense Contract Management Agency Headquarters to Fort Lee, VA. 

Realign 400 Army Navy Drive, a leased installation in Arlington, VA, by relocating the Office of the 

Secretary of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, and the DoD Inspector General to Fort Belvoir, 

VA. 

Realign the Webb Building, a leased installation in Arlington, VA, by relocating the Department of 

Defense Education Activity and the Defense Human Resources Activity to Fort Belvoir, VA. 

Realign Rosslyn Plaza North, a leased installation in Arlington, VA, by relocating offices accommodating 

Pentagon Renovation temporary space, Washington Headquarters Services and the Defense Human 

Resources Activity to Fort Belvoir, VA. 

Realign Crystal Gateway North, a leased installation in Arlington, VA, by relocating the Office of the 

Secretary of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, and the DoD Inspector General to Fort Belvoir, 

VA. 

Realign 2001 North Beauregard Street, 621 North Payne Street, Ballston Metro Center, Crystal Square 4, 

Crystal Square 5, Crystal Plaza 6, 4015 Wilson Boulevard, Skyline 5, and Skyline 6, leased installations 

in Northern VA, by relocating the Office of the Secretary of Defense to Fort Belvoir, VA. 

Realign Crystal Mall 3, a leased installation in Arlington, VA, by relocating the Office of the Secretary of 

Defense and the Defense Finance and Accounting Service at Fort Belvoir, VA. 
Realign Hoffman 1, Crystal Gateway 1, Crystal Gateway 2, Crystal Gateway 3, and the James K. Polk 

Building, leased installations in Northern VA, by relocating the Office of the Secretary of Defense and 

Washington Headquarters Services to Fort Belvoir, VA. 

Realign the Nash Street Building, a leased installation in Arlington, VA, by relocating the Defense 

Human Resources Activity to Fort Belvoir, VA. 

Realign Alexandria Tech Center IV, a leased installation in Alexandria, VA, by relocating the Defense 

Technology Security Administration to Fort Belvoir, VA. 

Realign 1400-1450 South Eads Street, a leased installation in Arlington, VA, by relocating the DoD 

Inspector General to Fort Belvoir, VA. 

Realign 1401 Wilson Boulevard, a leased installation in Arlington, VA, by relocating the Office of the 

Secretary of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, and Defense Human Resources Activity to Fort 

Belvoir, VA. 

Realign 1555 Wilson Boulevard, a leased installation in Arlington, VA, by relocating offices of the Office 

of the Secretary of Defense and Defense Human Resources Activity to Fort Belvoir, VA. 

Realign Crystal Mall 2-3-4 and Skyline 4, leased installations in Northern VA, by relocating Washington 

Headquarters Services to Fort Belvoir, VA. 

Close the Suffolk Building, a leased installation in Falls Church, VA. Relocate all Missile Defense 

Agency (MDA) functions, except the Ballistic Missile Defense System Sensors Directorate, to Redstone 

Arsenal, AL. 

Realign176 the Space and Missile Defense Command (SMDC) Building, a leased installation in 

Huntsville, AL. Relocate all functions of the Missile Defense Agency to Redstone Arsenal, AL. 

Realign Federal Office Building 2, Arlington, VA, by relocating a Headquarters Command Center for the 

Missile Defense Agency to Fort Belvoir, VA, and by relocating all other functions of the Missile Defense 

Agency, except the Command and Control Battle Management and Communications Directorate, to 

Redstone Arsenal, AL. 

Realign Fort Belvoir, VA, by relocating Soldier Magazine to Fort Meade, MD. 

Realign Fort Belvoir, VA by relocating Army Materiel Command (AMC) and the Security Assistance 

Command (USASAC, an AMC major subordinate command) to Redstone Arsenal, AL. 

Close National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) Dalecarlia and Sumner sites, Bethesda, MD; 

Reston 1, 2 and 3, leased installations in Reston, VA; Newington buildings 8510, 8520, and 8530, 

Newington, VA; and Building 213 a leased installation at the South East Federal Center, Washington, 

DC. Relocate all functions to a new facility at Fort Belvoir, VA. Realign the National Reconnaissance 

Office facility, Westfields, VA, by relocating all NGA functions to a new facility at the Fort Belvoir, VA. 

Consolidate all NGA National Geospatial-Intelligence College functions on Fort Belvoir into the new 

facility at Fort Belvoir, VA. 

Realign Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC, as follows: relocate all tertiary (subspecialty and complex care) medical services to National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, 
establishing it as the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center Bethesda, MD; relocate Legal 

Medicine to the new Walter Reed National Military Medical Center Bethesda, MD; relocate sufficient 

personnel to the new Walter Reed National Military Medical Center Bethesda, MD, to establish a 

Program Management Office that will coordinate pathology results, contract administration, and quality 

assurance and control of DoD second opinion consults worldwide; relocate all non-tertiary (primary and 

specialty) patient care functions to a new community hospital at Ft Belvoir, VA; relocate the Office of the 

Secretary of Defense supporting unit to Fort Belvoir, VA; disestablish all elements of the Armed Forces 

Institute of Pathology except the National Medical Museum and the Tissue Repository; relocate the 

Armed Forces Medical Examiner, DNA Registry, and Accident Investigation to Dover Air Force Base, 

DE; AFIP capabilities not specified in this recommendation will be absorbed into other DoD, Federal, or 

civilian facilities, as necessary; relocate enlisted histology technician training223 to Fort Sam Houston, 

TX; relocate the Combat Casualty Care Research sub-function (with the exception of those organizational 

elements performing neuroprotection research) of the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (Forest 

Glen Annex) and the Combat Casualty Care Research sub-function of the Naval Medical Research Center 

(Forest Glen Annex) to the Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, TX; relocate Medical 

Biological Defense Research of the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (Forest Glen Annex) and 

Naval Medical Research Center (Forest Glen Annex) to Fort Detrick, MD, and consolidate it with US 

Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases; relocate Medical Chemical Defense Research of 

the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (Forest Glen Annex) to Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, and 

consolidate it with the US Army Medical Research Institute of Chemical Defense; and close the main 

post. 

Realign Fort Belvoir, VA, by relocating the Chemical Biological Defense Research component of the 

Defense Threat Reduction Agency to Edgewood Chemical Biological Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, 

MD. 

Realign Naval Support Activity Mechanicsburg, PA, as follows: relocate the Budget/Funding, 

Contracting, Cataloging, Requisition Processing, Customer Services, Item Management, Stock Control, 

Weapon System Secondary Item Support, Requirements Determination, Integrated Materiel Management 

Technical Support Inventory Control Point functions for Consumable Items, except those Navy items 

associated with Nuclear Propulsion Support, Level 1/Subsafe and Deep Submergence System Program 

(DSSP) Management, Strategic Weapon Systems Management, Design Unstable/Preproduction Test, 

Special Waivers, Major End Items and Fabricated or Reclaimed items to Defense Supply Center 

Columbus, OH, and reestablish them as Defense Logistics Agency Inventory Control Point functions; 

disestablish the procurement management and related support functions for Depot Level Reparables and 

designate them as Defense Supply Center Columbus, OH, Inventory Control Point functions; and relocate 

the oversight of Budget/Funding, Contracting, Cataloging, Requisition Processing, Customer Services, 

Item Management, Stock Control, Weapon System Secondary Item Support, Requirements 

Determination, Integrated Materiel Management Technical Support Inventory Control Point functions for 

Consumable Items and the oversight of procurement management and related support functions for Depot 

Level Reparables to the Defense Logistics Agency, Fort Belvoir, VA. 

Realign Marine Corps Base, Albany, GA, as follows: relocate the Budget/Funding, Contracting, 

Cataloging, Requisition Processing, Customer Services, Item Management, Stock Control, Weapon 

System Secondary Item Support, Requirements Determination, Integrated Materiel Management 

Technical Support Inventory Control Point functions for any residual Consumable Items to Defense 

Supply Center Columbus, OH, and reestablish them as Defense Logistics Agency Inventory Control Point 

functions; disestablish the procurement management and related support functions for Depot Level 

Reparables and designate them as Defense Supply Center Columbus, OH, Inventory Control Point 

functions; and relocate the oversight of Budget/Funding, Contracting, Cataloging, Requisition Processing, 

Customer Services, Item Management, Stock Control, Weapon System Secondary Item Support, 
Requirements Determination, Integrated Materiel Management Technical Support Inventory Control 

Point functions for Consumable Items and the oversight of procurement management and related support 

functions for Depot Level Reparables to the Defense Logistics Agency, Fort Belvoir, VA. 

Realign Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH, by relocating the oversight of Budget/Funding, 

Contracting, Cataloging, Requisition Processing, Customer Services, Item Management, Stock Control, 

Weapon System Secondary Item Support, Requirements Determination, Integrated Materiel Management 

Technical Support Inventory Control Point functions for Consumable Items and the oversight of 

procurement management and related support functions for Depot Level Reparables to the Defense 

Logistics Agency, Fort Belvoir, VA. 

Realign Fort Belvoir, VA, by assigning the oversight of Budget/Funding, Contracting, Cataloging, 

Requisition Processing, Customer Services, Item Management, Stock Control, Weapon System 

Secondary Item Support, Requirements Determination, Integrated Materiel Management Technical 

Support Inventory Control Point functions for Consumable Items and the oversight of procurement 

management and related support functions for Depot Level Reparables to the Defense Logistics Agency, 

Fort Belvoir, VA. 

Realign Fort Belvoir, VA, by relocating Defense Threat Reduction Agency National Command Region 

conventional armament Research to Eglin Air Force Base, FL. 
Enclosure 2 

List of Projects to be Analyzed in Fort Belvoir BRAC EIS 

Project 

number Project title 

Fiscal 

year 

65416 NGA Administrative Facility 2007–11 

64234 WHS Administrative Facility 2008–10 

67320 MDA Facility 2008–09 

64238 Hospital 2008–11 

64241 Dental Clinic 2010–11 

64293 Medical Guest House 2009 

65871 NARMC Headquarters Building 2009 

67959 Infrastructure 2008–09 

64076 Emergency Services Center (EPG) 2008 

65448 Network Operations Center (part of PEO EIS) 2010 

65447 USANCA Support Facility 2008 

55661 Child Development Center (NGA) 2011 

55662 Child Development Center 2011 

65450 Administrative Facility (Bldgs 211, 215, 219, 220) 2011 

63571 Access Control Point 2009 

66228 AMC Relocatables 2007 

65592/67231 PEO EIS Administrative Facility 2007 

62752 Network Enterprise Communications Facility (AKO) 2008 

61450/65747 Gunston Road Improvements 2010 

54347 Structured Parking Facility, 200 Area 2011 

62892 Modernize Barracks 2011 

64531 Expand and Renovate PX 2007 

57508 Corps of Engineers Integration Office (Temporary) 2007 

54898 MWR Family Travel Camp 2007–10 
















Information Services Order Form

Please check the services desired and provide details in the spaces provided. You do 

not have to fill in all of the spaces in order to submit the form. Due to a technical issue, 

online submission is currently unavailable, please print out and mail the form to: 

Project Review Coordinator 

DCR Division of Natural Heritage 

217 Governor St. 

Richmond, VA 23219 

Voice: (804) 786-7951 Fax: (804) 371-2674 

The following 3 services are free of charge; however, due to staff and budget 

constraints we ask that you submit serious inquiries only, please. 

Rare Vascular Plant Species of Virginia 

Rare Animal Species of Virginia 

County Lists of Natural Heritage Resources (also available on our website at 

www.dcr.state.va.us/dnh/nhrinfo.htm). 

For county lists, please specify the counties of interest: 

Fairfax County

The following services have varying charges associated with them, please read all 

the documentation carefully and be sure to fill in all the necessary fields.

Project Review.............................$60 per site; add $35 for 1-5 occurrences, $60 for 6 

or more occurrences 

Project Review 

Details: Describe project below, please include detailed project description, 

Location information, Conditions (photographs if available). Fax additional 

information as necessary. 
In order to ensure an accurate assessment, please fax a site map (preferably 

from a USGS topo) to: 

Environmental Review Coordinator @ (804) 371-2674. 

Please see attached letter and map.

Natural Heritage Resource Reports & Maps 

County Conservation Sites Maps (specify counties)...............$20/county 

Custom NHR Maps (describe, call for more information).......$60/hour 

Custom NHR Reports (describe, call for more information)....$60/hour 

Digital Conservation Sites Subscription Service (specify area of interest; 

complete license agreement) 

 Less than 1 county or 12 quads).....$1000/yr. 

 13-100 quads................................$3500/yr. 

statewide coverage........................$6000/yr. 

Please provide details below: 

Priority Service(3 day turnaround)...............$200 surcharge 

Conditions:

1. Digitized DCR natural heritage resource locational data for GIS or map 

production, whether provided by DCR digitally or entered by the client from 

tables or reports, may not be used without first completing a data licensing 
agreement with DCR Division of Natural Heritage. A License form is available 

here . 

2. Although DCR-DNH data are closely quality controlled, DCR-DNH makes no 

warranty as to the fitness of the data for any purpose. 

3. Any publication of data provided by DCR,whether as text,table or map, must 

acknowledge Virginia DCR-Natural Heritage Program, and include the date the 

data were provided by DCR. 

4. If fees are assessed, an invoice will be included with the response. Payment is due 

within 30 days of receipt. Minimum charge for hourly fees is $60. 

I understand and agree to the above conditions: Yes 

Send data and invoice (if applicable) to:

(Please be sure to include a phone number so we may contact you if we have any 

questions regarding your data needs) 

Name: Patrick Solomon 

Email: patrick.solomon@tetratech-ffx.com 

Company: Tetra Tech, Inc. 

Address: 10306 Eaton Place, Suite 340 

City: Fairfax 

State: VA 

Zip Code: 22030 

Phone: 703-385-6000 

Taxpayer ID#: 

Clear Form

Go back to the Information Services page 

Return to the Virginia Natural Heritage Program home page 
















LEGEND

For

Bald Eagle Foraging Area

/

Proposed Travel 

Camp Site

Proposed 

RIF Site

Fairfax County

Parkway ROW

0 500 1,000

Feet

0 250 500

Feet

Main Post

EPG

RIF Travel

Camp Site

EPG

Warren Rd

Tompkins

Basin

Area

Potomac River

Accotink 










From: Russell Townsend [mailto:RussellT@nc-cherokee.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 12:13 PM 

To: Holma, Marc (DHR); Kelly Yasaitis Fanizzo; 

Bill.l.sanders@belvoir.army.mil; Judith Riggin; mccatlin@earthlink.net; 

crbierce@aol.com; robertebeachaia@earthlink.net; Blank, Linda C.; 

bill_bolger@nps.gov; Betsy Merritt; Beacham, Deanna (GOV); Ross Randall 

Subject: RE: DHR letter on BRAC at Fort Belvoir 

Mr. Holma, 

 

We received today your DHC letter concerning Fort Belvoir. The Tribal 

Historic Preservation Office of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians 

appreciates the detail and accuracy of the letter. We further appreciate 

the fact that you addressed the real need for federally mandated tribal 

consultation for this project. However, Fort Belvoir is outside of the 

Traditional Aboriginal Territory of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians. 

Our area of concern includes only the westernmost 17 counties of the state 

of Virginia. Other tribes may still have concerns they would liked to have 

addressed through consultation, and we will defer to their judgment. Thank 

you again for your consideration. 

 

Sincerely, 

Russell Townsend 

EBCI THPO 

 

 

________________________________ 

From: Sanders, Bill L. 

Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 10:02 AM 

To: McLaughlin, Patrick M. FB-DPW; Manning, Derek Contractor; Edwards, Donna 

J. FB-CMDGRP 

Cc: McMullen, Claude; O'Brien, Daniel FB-DPW 

Subject: FW: DHR letter on BRAC at Fort Belvoir 

All, FYI. 

 

Donna, please provide to IC. Assume original is in the mail. 

 

vr 

________________________________ 

From: Holma, Marc (DHR) [mailto:Marc.Holma@dhr.virginia.gov] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 9:39 AM 

To: Kelly Yasaitis Fanizzo; Bill.l.sanders@belvoir.army.mil; Judith Riggin; 

mccatlin@earthlink.net; russtown@nc-cherokee.com; crbierce@aol.com; 

robertebeachaia@earthlink.net; Blank, Linda C.; bill_bolger@nps.gov; Betsy 

Merritt; Beacham, Deanna (GOV); Ross Randall 

Subject: DHR letter on BRAC at Fort Belvoir 

Attached is the Department of Historic Resources' response to the February 

9, 

2007, letter from Fort Belvoir initiation Section 106 consuation regarding 

BRAC actions on post. 

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED 

Caveats: NONE 

 Classification: UNCLASSIFIED 

Caveats: NONE