alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          4,069,233
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                                  0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                4,900,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                        0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    81,378,709
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                        286,626,576
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                          282,162,000
<LOANS>                                       128,696,595
<ALLOWANCE>                                     2,357,396
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                515,937,349
<DEPOSITS>                                    409,706,387
<SHORT-TERM>                                   62,550,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             3,451,097
<LONG-TERM>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                        4,123,128
<OTHER-SE>                                     36,105,737
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                515,937,349
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 5,707,892
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              11,861,744
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  288,396
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               17,858,032
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              9,101,957
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             10,992,846
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           6,865,186
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                           0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                      0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 2,799,635
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 4,329,151
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      4,329,151
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                    2,762,779
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0.88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.88
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       1.08
<LOANS-NON>                                       721,537
<LOANS-PAST>                                      854,812
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                2,118,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 9,595,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                2,458,777
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     101,381
<RECOVERIES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               2,357,396
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            2,357,396
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                 0
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1128 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1128

 To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide an additional place 
        for holding court in the Southern District of New York.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 3, 1995

  Mr. Gilman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide an additional place 
        for holding court in the Southern District of New York.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 112(b) of 
title 28, United States Court, is amended in the last sentence by 
striking ``and White Plains'' and inserting ``, White Plains, and the 
Town of Walkill (or a suitable site nearby)''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 515.316 License.

Except as otherwise specified, the term *license* shall mean any license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to this part.
FOR PUBLICATION

JUDICIAL COUNCIL

 OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN RE COMPLAINT OF

JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT

No. 16-90121

ORDER

Filed October 3, 2016

ORDER

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Complainant alleges that the district judge presiding over

his criminal case has acted “without lawful authority”

because the judge, upon being sworn in, gave a version of the

judicial oath that preceded the standard language prescribed

at 28 U.S.C. § 453, as amended by the Judicial Improvements

Act of 1990. Both the district court and the Ninth Circuit

Court of Appeals have previously rejected this or similar

arguments raised by complainant.

To the extent complainant alleges that the judge

improperly denied his motion to dismiss, based on a

“deficient” oath, these allegations relate directly to the merits

of the judge’s rulings and must be dismissed. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 352(b)(1)(A)(ii); In re Charge of Judicial Misconduct,

685 F.2d 1226, 1227 (9th Cir. Jud. Council 1982); JudicialConduct Rule 11(c)(1)(B).
2 IN RE COMPLAINT OF JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT

Moreover, complainant cites no authority stating that

minor variations in the phrasing of the judicial oath may be

grounds for disqualifying a judge, or could constitute

misconduct. Because complainant fails to allege any conduct

“prejudicial to the effective and expeditious administration of

the business of the courts,” these charges are dismissed. See

In re Complaint of Judicial Misconduct, 726 F.3d 1060, 1062

(9th Cir. Jud. Council 2013); Judicial-Conduct Rule

11(c)(1)(A).

DISMISSED.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The
undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Quanta, Inc. (the “Company”), certifies that, to his knowledge:



|1. | The
    report of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2021 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
    “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|2. | The
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
    the Company.                                                                                                         



|Date:
    April 15, 2022 | By: | /s/
    Arthur Mikaelian                                                          
|------------------------ | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                         |     | Arthur
    Mikaelian
    President, Chairman, Director and Chief Executive Officer
|                         |     | (Principal
    Executive Officer and Interim Principal Financial Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal Nos. 09-33]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601-3740.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittals 09-33 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

Dated: August 12, 2009.

Patricia L. Toppings,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 42246)          ( print page 42247)          ( print page 42248)          ( print page 42249)          ( print page 42250)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[FR Doc. E9-20005 Filed 8-20-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          31,529
<SECURITIES>                                     3,910
<RECEIVABLES>                                  182,424
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     18,535
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               240,827
<PP&E>                                         924,792
<DEPRECIATION>                                 212,924
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,010,276
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          215,162
<BONDS>                                        389,745
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    105,507
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     226,892
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,010,276
<SALES>                                      1,118,288
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,295,809
<CGS>                                        1,098,634
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,223,918
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,407
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 51,290
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    50,771
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.34


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

Editorial Note on Part 360
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 360 appear at 79 FR 8860, Feb. 14, 2014.

§ 360.47 Authorized reissue; during lifetime. A bond belonging to a living individual may be reissued in any form of registration authorized by the regulations in this part upon an appropriate request under the conditions and for the purposes outlined in this section. ( a ) *Single ownership.* A bond registered in single ownership form may be reissued: ( 1 ) To add a coowner or beneficiary; or
( 2 ) To name a new owner, with or without a coowner or beneficiary as requested by the new owner, but only if the previous owner and the new owner are parties to a divorce or annulment; or
( 3 ) To name as new sole owner the personal trust estate created by the previous owner or which designates as beneficiary the previous owner.
( b ) *Coownership.* During the lifetime of both coowners: ( 1 ) A coownership bond may be reissued to name a new owner, with or without a coowner or beneficiary as requested by the new owner, but only if at least one of the coowners and the new owner are parties to a divorce or annulment, but reissue is limited to the extent of that coowner's interest in the bond (See § 360.22(a)); or
( 2 ) To name as new sole owner the personal trust estate created by at least one of the coowners or which designates as beneficiary at least one of the coowners.
( c ) *Beneficiary.* A bond registered in beneficiary form may be reissued: ( 1 ) To substitute another individual as beneficiary; or
( 2 ) To eliminate the beneficiary, and, if the beneficiary is eliminated, to effect any of the reissues authorized by paragraph (a) of this section.
39957.

#### DAN E. AUSTIN, JR., *&*SONS, INC. v. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY.

Jordan, Judge.

This was a suit by the plaintiff insured to recover damages against the defendant insurance company under a policy of insurance which contained a rider insuring cattle while being transported in plaintiff’s trucks against death or destruction directly resulting from or made necessary by “collision or derailment or overturn of a vehicle upon *554which the insured property is being transported.” The petition alleged that on October 4, 1959, while said insurance was in full force and effect, two cows, being transported in one of the plaintiff’s trucks, were killed when both tires on the right rear wheel of the truck blew out, causing the vehicle to sway and overturn. The petition alleged that the cows were valued at $550, and this sum, plus the statutory penalty for bad faith and attorney’s fees, was sought as damages.

Decided April 2, 1963.

*Noah J. Stone, Hugh W. Stone,*for plaintiff in error.

*Hurt, Baird & Peek, J. Corbett Peek, Jr., Robert Todd,*contra.

The defendant filed its answer in which it denied that the loss was covered by the policy of insurance and alleged that the claim presented to it by the plaintiff varied materially from the allegations of the petition and did not show a loss within the policy coverage. The case proceeded to trial before a jury, and a verdict was returned in favor of the defendant insurance company. The plaintiff’s motion for new trial on the general grounds only was denied, and the exception is to that judgment. *Held:*

While the evidence in this case was sufficient to authorize a finding that the plaintiff’s cows died in the occurrence complained of, and that the same constituted an “overturning” or “upset” of the insured’s vehicle under the terms of the insurance policy sued upon, such finding was not demanded by the evidence; and this court cannot therefore disturb the judgment of the trial court denying the plaintiff’s motion for new trial on the general grounds only. The evidence here being in conflict as to the exact cause of the death of the cows and in other material aspects of the case, we cannot say that there was no evidence to support the verdict. Such a verdict cannot be set aside because a different verdict would have been authorized. *Scott v. Gillis,*202 Ga. 220 (2) (43 SE2d 95); *Sweet v. Awtry,*70 Ga. App. 334 (1) (28 SE2d 154); *Grace v. Grace,*92 Ga. App. 693 (2) (89 SE2d 813).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Frankum, J., concur.*
AMENDMENT TO SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE
AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment to Promissory Note Agreement
(the “Amendment”), is effective as of August 7, 2012 (the “Effective Date”), and is entered
by and between T3 Motion, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Company”), and JMJ Financial (hereinafter referred
to as the “Holder”).


 


Recitals


 


WHEREAS, Company and the Holder are parties
to that certain Secured Promissory Note Agreement dated July 10, 2012, as amended July 30, 2012 and August 3, 2012 (the “Note”);
and


 


WHEREAS, the parties now wish to amend the
Note as set forth in further detail below.


 


Agreement


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
foregoing and the mutual covenants and premises contained in this Amendment, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged,
the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


		1.	The maturity date of the Note is hereby extended from August 7, 2012, to August 10, 2012.



 


		2.	Except as provided herein, all other provisions of the Note shall remain in full force and effect until expiration or termination
as set forth therein.



 


This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts,
each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which shall together constitute one and the same agreement. Delivery of an
executed counterpart of the signature page to this Amendment by facsimile or by email of a scanned copy will be effective as delivery
of an original executed counterpart of this Amendment.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused
this Amendment to be executed as of the Effective Date.


  


	
        T3 Motion, Inc. 

         

         

        By:/s/ Domonic Carney                  

        Name:Domonic Carney

        Title:  Chief Financial Officer 

         
	
        JMJ Financial

         

         

        By:/s/ Justin Keener                  

        Name: JMJ Financial

        Title:   Its Principal
FIRST AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                              AMENDED AND RESTATED
                         LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
                                       OF
                          PLM EQUIPMENT GROWTH FUND V

         This First Amendment  ("Amendment") to the Amended and Restated Limited
Partnership   Agreement   ("Agreement")   of  PLM   Equipment   Growth   Fund  V
("Partnership") is executed as of November 21, 1996, by its general partner, PLM
Financial Services,  Inc., a Delaware corporation ("General Partner"),  pursuant
to Article XVIII of the Agreement.  All capitalized  terms not otherwise defined
herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.

                                    RECITALS

         The  Partners  entered  into  a  Limited  Partnership  Agreement  as of
November 14, 1989, and an Amended and Restated Limited Partnership  Agreement as
of April 6, 1990.

         The  General  Partner  now amends the  Agreement,  pursuant  to Article
XVIII,  paragraph two,  subsections  (i) and (ii), to add for the benefit of the
Limited Partners, to the General Partner's  representations and obligations,  to
cure any ambiguity or to correct any inconsistency that may exist among Sections
6.01,  6.02 and 9.02 of the  Agreement.  In executing this Amendment the General
Partner  represents,  warrants  and agrees,  and will take all action to ensure,
that this  Amendment  does  not,  and will not,  detrimentally  affect  the Cash
Distributions  of the Limited  Partners or  assignees or the  management  of the
Partnership by the General Partner.

         Now, therefor, the Agreement is amended as follows:

         1.       Section 6.02 is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

         "The General Partner shall not transfer its interest as General Partner
in the  Partnership  (which  transfer  shall be  deemed as  "withdrawal"  of the
General   Partner  for  purposes  of  Section  9.02)  or  its  interest  in  the
Partnership's capital,  earnings or assets (except in connection with the pledge
of the  General  Partner's  assets or right in  connection  with  loans or other
indebtedness)  except (a) upon the  approval  of a majority  in  interest of the
Limited  Partners,  or (b) to an Affiliate upon its merger,  consolidation  with
another  person  or  its  transfer  pursuant  to  a  reorganization  of  all  or
substantially  all of its assets to another  person,  and the  assumption of the
rights and duties of the General Partner by such Person; provided, however, that
such  successor  or  transferee  shall  on the  date of such  transfer,  merger,
consolidation or reorganization  assume all of the duties and obligations of the
General Partner set forth in this Agreement."

         IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  General  Partner  has  duly  executed  this
Amendment as of November 21, 1996.

PLM FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
a Delaware corporation,
General Partner and as
attorney-in-fact for and on
behalf of the Limited Partners

By:      /s/ J. Michael Allgood
         ------------------------
         Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Avaldo Austin, Appellant.

[804 NYS2d 275]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated April 28, 2003 *(People v Austin,*304 AD2d 835 [2003]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered September 26, 2000.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of.appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., Santucci, Luciano and Rivera, JJ., concur.