alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Annual Counternarcotics Working Group Meeting with the Government of India

# 									Annual Counternarcotics Working Group Meeting with the Government of India							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

July 20, 2023

On Wednesday, July 19, the United States hosted the Government of India at the U.S. Department of State for the fourth annual U.S.-India Counternarcotics Working Group (CNWG) meeting.  The U.S. and Indian delegations addressed drug regulatory issues, law enforcement cooperation and collaboration, coordination in multilateral fora, and drug demand reduction efforts.  This year’s CNWG builds on India’s participation in Secretary Blinken’s virtual ministerial launching the Global Coalition to Address Synthetic Drug Threats earlier this month.  The two delegations also discussed recommended actions on advancing the U.S.-India drug policy relationship for the coming year.

The meeting included representatives from the Government of India including Narcotics Control Bureau Director General S.N. Pradhan and Ambassador of India to the United States Taranjit Singh Sandhu, and featured participation from Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights Uzra Zeya, Ambassador to the Republic of India Eric Garcetti, the White House’s Director of National Drug Control Policy Dr. Rahul Gupta, and Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for the Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs Lisa Johnson.

The delegations look forward to continuing to collaborate on the wide range of counternarcotics efforts and to holding the next CNWG in India in 2024.

Tags

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsCounternarcoticsDrugsIndiaOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
| (logo)  WELLS FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Fl  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

** **

Referenceis hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as ofDecember 1, 2016, by and among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC.,as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, LNRPARTNERS LLC, as Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asCertificate Administrator, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trusteeand TRIMONT REAL ESTATE ADVISORS, LLC, as Operating Advisor and as AssetRepresentations Reviewer with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates Series 2016-C37 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized termsused herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuantto Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice Presidentof Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.       Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.       Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28thday of February 2018.

 

 

/s/Daniel Bober

DanielBober

ExecutiveVice President

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo)  Together we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, as Chief Financial
Officer of Transcend Services, Inc., certifies that to the undersigneds knowledge, the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Transcend Services, Inc. at the dates
and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Lance Cornell      
|Lance Cornell          
|Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 19, 2008
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 351.16 What do I need to know about the base denomination for redemption value calculations?

We base all calculations of interest on a unit with a principal amount of $12.50. We use this unit value to determine the value of bonds in higher denominations. The effect of rounding off the value of the $12.50 unit increases at higher denominations. This can work to your slight advantage or disadvantage, depending on whether the value is rounded up or down.

# Example.

The following hypothetical example illustrates the calculation: A rate of 3.25% will result in a newly purchased $12.50 unit increasing in value after six months to $12.70, when rounded to the nearest cent. Therefore, a $5,000 definitive Series EE bond (with a principal amount of $2,500) will be worth $2,540 after six months ([$2,500 divided by $12.50] × $12.70 = $2,540.) In contrast, if applied directly to a $2,500 principal amount, the rate would render a value of $2,540.63 after six months, a difference of 63 cents. (This example does not account for any interest penalty that might apply if you redeem a bond less than five years after its issue date.)
§ 535.702 Prepenalty notice. ( a ) *When required.* If the Director of the Office of Foreign Assets Control (hereinafter “Director”) has reasonable cause to believe that there has occurred a violation of any provision of this part or a violation of the provisions of any license, ruling, regulation, order, direction or instruction issued by or pursuant to the direction or authorization of the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to this part or otherwise under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, and the Director determines that further proceedings are warranted, they shall issue to the person concerned a notice of their intent to impose a monetary penalty. The prepenalty notice shall be issued whether or not another agency has taken any action with respect to this matter.
( b ) *Contents* — ( 1 ) *Facts of violation.* The prepenalty notice shall: ( i ) Describe the violation.
( ii ) Specify the laws and regulations allegedly violated.
( iii ) State the amount of the proposed monetary penalty.
( 2 ) *Right to make presentations.* The prepenalty notice also shall inform the person of their right to make a written presentation within thirty (30) days of mailing of the notice as to why a monetary penalty should not be imposed, or, if imposed, why it should be in a lesser amount than proposed.
[53 FR 7356, Mar. 8, 1988, as amended at 89 FR 15741, Mar. 5, 2024]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1325 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1325

To amend the Public Buildings Act of 1959 concerning the calculation of 
                     public building transactions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 24, 1995

Mr. Traficant introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Public Buildings Act of 1959 concerning the calculation of 
                     public building transactions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PUBLIC BUILDING TRANSACTIONS.

    Section 7 of the Public Buildings Act of 1959 (40 U.S.C. 606) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(g) Calculation of Transactions.--For purposes of calculating 
public building transactions, any contract entered into by the 
Administrator under this Act for the purchase, lease-purchase, or lease 
of a public building approved pursuant to subsection (a) shall be 
treated in the same manner as if the contract was entered into 
immediately prior to fiscal year 1991.''.
                                 <all>
```
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

###### Editorial Note on Part 363

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 363 appear at 70 FR 57433, Sept. 30, 2005, 70 FR 57442, Sept. 30, 2005, and 75 FR 70815, Nov. 19, 2010.

#### § 363.143 How do I purchase a security using the redemption proceeds of my zero-percent certificate of indebtedness?

You may purchase an eligible security by redeeming all or a portion of your zero-percent certificate of indebtedness and applying the proceeds toward the purchase of another eligible security. To do this, your zero-percent certificate of indebtedness must be of sufficient value to cover the cost of the security. If you are paying for a security using the redemption proceeds of a zero-percent certificate of indebtedness, you must pay the full amount of the purchase price of the security using the redemption proceeds.

[69 FR 50309, Aug. 16, 2004. Redesignated at 75 FR 70816, Nov. 19, 2010]
§ 510.214 Prohibitions on persons owned or controlled by U.S. financial institutions. Except as otherwise authorized pursuant to this part, any person that is owned or controlled by a U.S. financial institution and established or maintained outside the United States is prohibited from knowingly engaging in any transaction directly or indirectly with the Government of North Korea or any person designated for the imposition of sanctions with respect to North Korea described in § 510.201(a)(3)(vii) through (ix) and under an applicable Executive order (as defined in NKSPEA, as amended) or an applicable United Nations Security Council resolution (as defined in NKSPEA, as amended). Note 1 to § 510.214 :
For information regarding persons blocked pursuant to this part, or another part of 31 CFR chapter V in connection with North Korea-related activities, including identifier information for entries on the SDN List, *see* Note 4 to § 510.201(a).
Note 2 to § 510.214 :
A U.S. financial institution is subject to the civil penalties provided for in section 206(b) of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 *et seq.*) if any entity that it owns or controls violates, attempts to violate, conspires to violate, or causes a violation of the prohibitions set forth in this section. *See* § 510.701.
[85 FR 20161, Apr. 10, 2020]
§ 13.3 Eligibility to receive protection or reimbursement. ( a ) Protection, as determined by the Assistant Secretary, will be provided by the United States Secret Service Uniformed Division, pursuant to section 202 of Title 3, U.S. Code, as amended by Pub. L. 94-196, only to foreign diplomatic missions located in metropolitan areas (other than the District of Columbia) where there are located twenty or more such missions, as determined by the Secretary of State, which are headed by full time officers. According to present State Department figures, the following metropolitan areas have 20 or more such foreign diplomatic missions: Chicago, Houston, Los Angeles, Miami, New York City, New Orleans and San Francisco. The protection provided by State or local governments rather than the United States Secret Service Uniformed Division will be reimbursed pursuant to section 208(a) of Title 3, U.S. Code and §§ 13.6, 13.7 and 13.8 of this part.
( b ) Protection or reimbursement will be provided for the metropolitan areas described in paragraph (a) of this section only if: ( 1 ) The affected metropolitan area requests such protection or reimbursement;
( 2 ) The Assistant Secretary determines that an extraordinary protective need exists; and
( 3 ) The extraordinary need arises in association with a visit to or occurs at or, pursuant to § 13.6, in the vicinity of: ( i ) A permanent mission to an international organization of which the United States is a member,
( ii ) an observer mission invited to participate in the work of an international organization of which the United States is a member, or
( iii ) in the case of a visit by a foreign official or dignitary to participate in an activity of an international organization of which the United States is a member, a foreign diplomatic mission, including a consular office of the same country as the visitor.
( c ) Protection (or reimbursement) may be extended at places of temporary domicile in connection with a visit under paragraph (b) of this section.
( d ) Where an extraordinary protective need exists, protection (or reimbursement) may be extended to missions as described in §§ 13.3(b)(3) (i) and (ii) whether or not associated with a visit by a foreign dignitary.
[45 FR 30621, May 9, 1980]
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

Editorial Note on Part 363
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 363 appear at 70 FR 57433, Sept. 30, 2005, 70 FR 57442, Sept. 30, 2005, and 75 FR 70815, Nov. 19, 2010.

§ 363.40 How are payments of principal and interest made? ( a ) *Payment of a savings bond that has reached final maturity.* We will purchase a zero-percent certificate of indebtedness in your TreasuryDirect ® account using the proceeds of a matured savings bond.
( b ) *Payments of interest and principal (except a savings bond that has reached final maturity).* ( 1 ) We provide two methods of receiving payments of principal and interest: ( i ) Payment to your account at a financial institution by the ACH method, or
( ii ) Payment to your TreasuryDirect account to purchase a zero-percent certificate of indebtedness.
( 2 ) You may select different payment destinations for principal and interest for a marketable Treasury security. You may change your payment destination at any time, unless the security is in the closed book period. (See § 363.210.)
( 3 ) If we are unable to deliver a payment, we will use the payment to purchase a zero-percent certificate of indebtedness in your TreasuryDirect account.
[70 FR 57443, Sept. 30, 2005]
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 306.87 Partnerships (including nominee partnerships).

An assignment of a security registered in the name of or assigned to a partnership must be executed by a general partner. Upon dissolution of a partnership, assignment by all living partners and by the persons entitled to assign in behalf of any deceased partner's estate will be required unless the laws of the jurisdiction authorize a general partner to bind the partnership by any act appropriate for winding up partnership affairs. In those cases where assignments by or in behalf of all partners are required this fact must be shown in the assignment; otherwise, an affidavit by a former general partner must be furnished identifying all the persons who had been partners immediately prior to dissolution. Upon voluntary dissolution, for any jurisdiction where a general partner may not act in winding up partnership affairs, an assignment by a liquidating partner, as such, must be supported by a duly executed agreement among the partners appointing the liquidating partner.
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office

Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800

Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001

41–912 PDF 2008

S. HRG. 110–378

[ERRATA]

HEARING ON PENDING LEGISLATION

HEARING

BEFORE THE

COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS 

UNITED STATES SENATE

ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS

FIRST SESSION

NOVEMBER 14, 2007

Printed for the use of the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

(

Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/senate 

[ERRATA] 

The referenced hearing held before the Senate Committee on 

Veterans’ Affairs was inadvertently printed with a title error. The 

hearing’s title should read ‘‘Markup of Pending Legislation’’ both on 

the cover and on page 1.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ELSA SANCHEZ and LUIS SANCHEZ
, Appellant s ,

v.

CIT I ZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 23

- 642

[ July 19, 2023 ]

Appeal of a nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Michael A. Robinson , Judge; L.T. Case

No. CACE22011898

.

Jeremy D. Bailie of Weber, Crabb & Wein, P.A., St. Petersburg, for appellants.

Scot E. Samis, C. Ryan Jones

, and Brandon R. Christian of Traub

Lieberman Straus & Shrew s berry LLP, St. Petersburg, for appellee.

G ERBER
, J

.

The homeowners appeal from the circuit court’s non

- final order granting the insurer’s motion to stay and compel appraisal. After the

homeowners filed the ir initial brief, the insurer filed a motion to dismiss this appeal as moot, on the basis that the insurer was withdrawing its demand for appraisal and agreeing to a lift of the stay so the underlying litigation can proceed. The homeowners filed a respons e arguing that because the insurer has consented to the homeowners’ requested relief,

we should treat the insurer’s motion to dismiss as a confession of error

and reverse the circuit court’s order

.

By previous order, we agreed with the homeowners’ response, and

indicated we would treat the insurer’s motion to dismiss as a confession

of error

. See

, e.g. , Barfield v. Dep ’ t of State, Div. of Licensing , 568 So. 2d 493, 494 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990) ( where, after the appellant’s ap peal, the appellee agreed to the appellant’s requested relief, and the appellee then filed a motion to dismiss the appeal as moot, the appellate court elect ed to2 treat the appellee ’ s motion to dismiss as a confession of error, and reverse d

and remand ed th e ca se for further proceedings ).

We now reverse the circuit court’s non

- final order granting the insurer’s motion to stay and compel appraisal, and remand for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

M AY and C IKLIN
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### § 526.406 Offshore transactions involving blocked property.

The prohibitions in § 526.201 on transactions or dealings involving blocked property, as defined in § 526.301, apply to transactions by any U.S. person in a location outside the United States.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1339

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide for mandatory

coverage of services furnished by nurse practitioners and clinical nurse

specialists under State medicaid plans.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 28, 1995

Mr. RICHARDSON (for himself, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. FROST, Mr. MCHALE, Ms.

RIVERS, Mr. VENTO, Mr. MINGE, Mrs. LOWEY, Ms. PELOSI, Ms.

LOFGREN, and Mr. DELLUMS) introduced the following bill; which was

referred to the Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide

for mandatory coverage of services furnished by nurse

practitioners and clinical nurse specialists under State

medicaid plans.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1339 IH

1 SECTION 1. MEDICAID COVERAGE OF SERVICES FUR2 NISHED BY CERTIFIED NURSE PRACTITION3 ERS AND CLINICAL NURSE SPECIALISTS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1905(a)(21) of the Social

5 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d(a)(21)) is amended to read

6 as follows:

7 ‘‘(21) services furnished by a certified nurse

8 practitioner (as defined by the Secretary) or a clini9 cal nurse specialist (as defined in subsection (t))

10 which the certified nurse practitioner or clinical

11 nurse specialist is legally authorized to perform

12 under State law (or the State regulatory mechanism

13 provided by State law), whether or not the certified

14 nurse practitioner or clinical nurse specialist is

15 under the supervision of, or associated with, a physi16 cian or other health care provider;’’.

17 (b) DEFINITION OF CLINICAL NURSE SPECIALIST.—

18 Section 1905 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d) is amended

19 by adding at the end the following new subsection:

20 ‘‘(t) The term ‘clinical nurse specialist’ means an in21 dividual who has earned a master’s degree in a clinical

22 area of nursing from an accredited institution and who

23 is a registered nurse licensed to practice nursing in the

24 State in which the individual furnishes services.’’.

25 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

26 subsections (a) and (b) shall apply to calendar quarters
3

•HR 1339 IH

1 beginning on or after January 1, 1996, without regard

2 to whether or not final regulations to carry out such

3 amendments have been promulgated by such date.

®
ATIANTIC OCEAN

BATHYMETRIC MAP BALTIMORE RISE

BALTIMORE RISE
NOS NJ 18-9

oun

atone Wierd (om wares

Heri MIRCATN Med OeN
Soke 12.000
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Assistant Secretary Donfried’s Travel to the Republic of Bulgaria

# 									Assistant Secretary Donfried’s Travel to the Republic of Bulgaria							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

May 17, 2022

On May 18-19, Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Dr. Karen Donfried will visit Sofia, Bulgaria, for a series of high-level meetings to reaffirm the strong bilateral partnership between the United States and Bulgaria.  During her visit, Assistant Secretary Donfried will meet with senior Bulgarian government officials and leaders of political parties, and discuss a range of key issues, including our robust bilateral security cooperation, NATO’s unified response to Russia’s unprovoked war against Ukraine, the U.S. commitment to supporting Bulgaria’s energy security and efforts to combat corruption, and other regional issues.

This is the latest in a series of high-level engagements between the United States and Bulgaria.  Most recently, Vice President Kamala Harris, Secretary of State Antony Blinken, White House National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan, and Department of State Under Secretary for Political Affairs Victoria Nuland met with Bulgarian Prime Minister Kirill Petkov during his May 9-10 visit to Washington, D.C.  Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin visited Bulgaria in March, and State Department Counselor Derek Chollet visited Sofia in February.  Assistant Secretary Donfried’s visit will build on these recent engagements and set the stage for the next meeting of the U.S.-Bulgaria bilateral strategic dialogue later this year.

Tags

BulgariaBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial International Travel

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top