alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 163 (Tuesday, August 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 42851]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20362]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Georgia Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a meeting of the 
Georgia Advisory Committee (Committee) to the Commission will convene 
on Tuesday, September 8, 2009 at 4 p.m. and adjourn at approximately 7 
p.m. at 3593 Hemphill Street, College Park, Georgia. The purpose of the 
meeting is to discuss the Committee's report on fair housing 
enforcement and future Committee activities.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The 
comments must be received in the regional office by October 8, 2009. 
The address is U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 61 Forsyth St., SW., 
Suite 18T40, Atlanta, GA 30303. Persons wishing to e-mail their 
comments, or to present their comments verbally at the meeting, or who 
desire additional information should contact Peter Minarik, Regional 
Director, Southern Regional Office, at (404) 562-7000 or 800-877-8339 
for individuals who are deaf, hearing impaired, and/or have speech 
disabilities or by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a5d5c8cccbc4d7cccee5d0d6c6c6d78bc2cad3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e999848087889b8082a99c9a8a8a9bc78e869f">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require 
the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional 
Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the 
meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Southern Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Southern Regional Office at the above 
e-mail or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, August 19, 2009.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. E9-20362 Filed 8-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2628 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2628

 To confirm the President's commitment that the social security trust 
       funds will not be used other than for payment of benefits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 14, 1995

 Mr. Gephardt (for himself, Mr. Bonior, Mr. Fazio of California, Mrs. 
Kennelly, Mr. Matsui, Mr. Gutierrez, Ms. Kaptur, Mr. Torres, Mr. Owens, 
   Mr. Brewster, Mr. Studds, Mr. Yates, Mr. Stark, Mr. Volkmer, Mrs. 
    Thurman, Mr. Frost, Mr. Miller of California, Mr. LaFalce, Mr. 
   Oberstar, Mr. Gejdenson, Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas, Mr. 
   Lipinski, Mr. Stupak, Mr. Neal of Massachusetts, Mr. Fattah, Ms. 
   Danner, Ms. Slaughter, Mr. Thornton, Mr. Costello, Mr. Engel, Mr. 
   Mfume, Mr. Vento, Mr. Chapman, Mr. Holden, Mr. Kleczka, Mr. de la 
Garza, Mr. Poshard, Ms. Eshoo, Mr. Wise, Mr. Markey, Mr. Pete Geren of 
Texas, Mr. Coleman, Mr. Lantos, Mr. Rahall, Mr. Conyers, Mr. Klink, Ms. 
 McCarthy, Mr. Reed, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, Mr. Kennedy of Rhode 
    Island, Mr. Doyle, Ms. Harman, Mr. Deutsch, Mr. Torricelli, Mr. 
Sisisky, Ms. Woolsey, Mr. Filner, Mr. Wilson, Mr. Ackerman, Mr. Tanner, 
  Mr. Schumer, Mr. McDermott, Mr. Visclosky, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Brown of 
  Ohio, Mrs. Mink of Hawaii, Mr. Pastor, Mr. Scott, Mr. Pomeroy, Mr. 
  DeFazio, Mr. Watt of North Carolina, Mr. Barrett of Wisconsin, Ms. 
Rivers, Mr. Minge, Mrs. Lowey, Ms. Lofgren, Mr. Farr of California, Mr. 
 Menendez, Mr. Pickett, Mr. Rush, Mr. Obey, Mr. Peterson of Minnesota, 
 and Mr. Condit) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To confirm the President's commitment that the social security trust 
       funds will not be used other than for payment of benefits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RESTRICTED USE OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY TRUST FUNDS.

    The Secretary of the Treasury may not use amounts held in any 
covered Federal fund for any purpose other than paying benefits and 
related administrative expenses from such fund.

SEC. 2. CONTINUED INVESTMENT OF AMOUNTS RECEIVED BY THE SOCIAL SECURITY 
              TRUST FUNDS.

    Notwithstanding the public debt limit, the Secretary of the 
Treasury may invest amounts credited to any covered Federal fund in 
accordance with normal operating procedures as otherwise provided by 
law.

SEC. 3. COVERED FEDERAL FUND.

    For purposes of this Act, the term ``covered Federal fund'' means--
            (1) the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund;
            (2) the Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund; and
            (3) each of the railroad retirement funds and accounts.
                                 <all>
```
HomeAssisted Schools...Brasilia, Brazil: American School of Brasilia: 2024 Special Needs Profile

# 									Brasilia, Brazil: American School of Brasilia: 2024 Special Needs Profile							

Special Needs Profile

Office of Overseas Schools

February 29, 2024

## 								School Contact Information							

        -  Tel: +55-61-3442-9700 | Overseas Schools Fact Sheet | Acting Regional Education Officer: Mike Emborsky 
        -  E-mail: admissions@eabdf.br | Website: www.eabdf.br 
        -  Additional details on special needs support at post found on the **School Summary Information Portal**(must have OKTA login to access).  For more information, contact A/OPR/OS (**overseasschools@state.gov** / +1-202-261-8200), MED/CFP Child and Family Program Team (**MEDCFP@state.gov**/ +1-202-663-1815), or the school directly. 

**Download the Special Needs Profile** (Brasilia- 2024 Special Needs- Brazil) for this school to learn more about their capability to support students with exceptionalities.

The **American School of Brasilia** (EAB) is a private, English-language, International Baccalaureate (IB) School founded in 1961. We offer an educational program from K3 through grade 12 and have students from over 40 countries. We offer the opportunity for students to develop bilingualism with our strong Portuguese language program. The school year is comprised of two semesters.

*This is intended to provide general information. Prospective users of the schools may wish to inquire further of A/OPR/OS or contact the school directly for more specific and up-to-the-minute information. Information and statistics are current as of December 2023 and provided by the school.*

NOTE: School situations can change quickly, particularly as schools face cutbacks to learning support programs due to the pandemic, unrest, and economic uncertainty. For the most current information, work with the REO and school. Information in this document was collected by the Department of State’s Office of Overseas Schools directly from the school in December 2023 and shows the availability of services rather than an assessment of the quality of the services. The profile is intended as a jumping off point for a conversation with the REO and school to understand the best fit for your child. Definitions may vary school to school.

Tags

BrazilOffice of Overseas Schools

Back to Top
#### Carlos Tomas GARCIA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Glenn A. MUELLER, Warden Folsom State Prison, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 00-15520.

D.C. No. CV-98-01789-LKK.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 12, 2001.1

Decided Feb. 22, 2001.

Before LEAVY, THOMAS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

1

. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM2

Carlos Thomas Garcia, a California state inmate, appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging retaliation, without leave to amend, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) for failure to state a *465claim. *See Resnick v. Hayes,*213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000). The district court’s denial of leave to amend is reviewed for abuse of discretion, see *Lopez v. Smith,*203 F.3d 1122, 1131 (9th Cir.2000) (en banc); and the district court’s decision not to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over related state law claims is reviewed for clear error, *see Brady v. Brown,*51 F.3d 810, 816 (9th Cir.1995). We affirm.

We conclude that the district court properly dismissed Garcia’s complaint, which alleged that he was denied a hardship transfer in retaliation for filing grievances, because the prison officials’ transfer decision was based on legitimate safety concerns. See *Pratt v. Rowland,*65 F.3d 802, 806 (9th Cir.1995). Therefore, the district court did not abuse its discretion by not granting Garcia an opportunity to amend his complaint because amendment would be futile. *See Lopez v. Smith,*203 F.3d at 1131.

The district court properly declined to exercise pendant jurisdiction over Garcia’s state law claims because his federal claims were absolutely devoid of merit. *See Brady,*51 F.3d at 816.

AFFIRMED.

2

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
# C_2020145EN.01000101.xml

| 30.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 145/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 145/1

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 28 April 2020

appointing the members of the Scientific and Technical Committee

(2020/C 145/01)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 134(2) thereof,

After consulting the European Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | By Decision of 6 November 2018 (1), the Council appointed the members of the Scientific and Technical Committee (‘the Committee’) for the period from 6 November 2018 to 6 November 2023. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By Decision of 6 November 2018 (1), the Council appointed the members of the Scientific and Technical Committee (‘the Committee’) for the period from 6 November 2018 to 6 November 2023.

| (2) | Following the decease of Mr Eugenijus UŠPURAS, a seat on the Committee has become vacant. A new member should therefore be appointed for the remainder of Mr Eugenijus UŠPURAS’ term of office. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Following the decease of Mr Eugenijus UŠPURAS, a seat on the Committee has become vacant. A new member should therefore be appointed for the remainder of Mr Eugenijus UŠPURAS’ term of office.

| (3) | Following the resignation of Mr Grzegorz WROCHNA, a seat on the Committee has become vacant. A new member should therefore be appointed for the remainder of Mr Grzegorz WROCHNA’s term of office, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Following the resignation of Mr Grzegorz WROCHNA, a seat on the Committee has become vacant. A new member should therefore be appointed for the remainder of Mr Grzegorz WROCHNA’s term of office,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Egidijus URBONAVIČIUS and Mr Józef SOBOLEWSKI are hereby appointed members of the Scientific and Technical Committee until 6 November 2023.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 28 April 2020.

For the Council

The President

G. GRLIĆ RADMAN

---

(1)  Council Decision of 6 November 2018 appointing the members of the Scientific and Technical Committee (OJ C 403, 9.11.2018, p. 2).

1

---
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 359.70 May Fiscal Service waive any provision in this part? We may waive or modify any provision of this part in any particular case or class of cases for the convenience of the United States or in order to relieve any person or persons of unnecessary hardship: ( a ) If such action would not be inconsistent with law or equity;
( b ) If it does not impair any material existing rights; and
( c ) If we are satisfied that such action would not subject the United States to any substantial expense or liability.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          2,863
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     703
<ALLOWANCES>                                      274
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0
<PP&E>                                          3,465
<DEPRECIATION>                                  3,447
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  4,354
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               0
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                      4,072
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    4,354
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                1,791
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     552
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   10
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,239
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             1,239
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,239
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    6.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES


<Table>
<Caption>
                                                                         YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,                   9 MONTHS
                                              ----------------------------------------------------------------        ENDED
                                                1996          1997          1998          1999          2000      SEP. 30, 2001
                                              --------      --------      --------      --------      --------    -------------
                                                                       (in thousands)
<S>                                           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>         <C>
EARNINGS
       Income From Continuing Operations*       59,246        61,925        53,885        72,856        65,951        88,665
       Fixed Charges                            36,485        35,458        30,915        34,305        55,621        50,526
       Distributed Income of
           Equity Investment                        --            --            --            --            --        28,000
       Capitalized Interest                     (1,388)       (1,478)         (795)       (2,133)       (4,559)       (2,040)
                                              --------      --------      --------      --------      --------      --------
           Total Earnings                       94,343        95,905        84,005       105,028       117,013       165,151
                                              ========      ========      ========      ========      ========      ========

FIXED CHARGES
       Interest Expense                         34,922        33,707        29,784        31,563        48,982        47,365
       Capitalized Interest                      1,388         1,478           795         2,133         4,559         2,040
       Rental Interest Factor                      175           273           336           609         2,080         1,121
                                              --------      --------      --------      --------      --------      --------
           Total Fixed Charges                  36,485        35,458        30,915        34,305        55,621        50,526
                                              ========      ========      ========      ========      ========      ========


RATIO: EARNINGS/FIXED CHARGES                     2.59          2.70          2.72          3.06          2.10          3.27
                                              ========      ========      ========      ========      ========      ========
</Table>

       * Excludes minority interest, extraordinary loss and undistributed equity
         earnings.
#### American Building Contractors Associates, Inc., Appellant, v Mica & Wood Creations, LLC, Defendant, and Fourmen Construction, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[804 NYS2d 109]

In an action, inter alia, to recover on a payment bond for a public improvement project under State Finance Law § 137 (3), the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lefkowitz, J.), entered December 6, 2004, which granted the motion of the defendants Fourmen Construction, Inc., and Colonial Surety Company for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated insofar as asserted against the respondents.

The Supreme Court erred in concluding ás a matter of law that the appellant failed to give the requisite written notice under State Finance Law § 137 (3), on the ground that its letter dated November 12, 2002, to the defendant Fourmen Construction, Inc. (hereinafter Fourmen), its contractor, did not mention a bond claim. As the respondents correctly concede, the statute does not specifically require that a notice refer to a bond claim.

Regarding the timeliness of the plaintiff’s written notice under State Finance Law § 137 (3), the respondents made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the ground that the notice was untimely *(see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]). However, in opposition, the plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact.

*323The respondents failed to make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the ground that this action is barred by the one-year statute of limitations provided by State Finance Law § 137 (4) (b). Pursuant to that provision, the one-year limitations period accrues on the date final payment is due on the claimant’s subcontract. However, the payment bond itself, which also provided for a one-year statute of limitations, contained a possibly more liberal accrual date—the date on which the “Principal,” i.e., Fourmen, ceased work on the contract. If, on the facts of this case, the bond’s accrual provision is more favorable to the plaintiff, it governs rather than the time period prescribed by State Finance Law § 137 (4) (b) *(see A.C. Legnetto Constr. v Hartford Fire Ins. Co.,*92 NY2d 275, 279 [1998]; *Willets Point Asphalt Corp. v R.L.I. Ins. Co.,*294 AD2d 356, 357 [2002]). However, since there is a triable issue of fact as to when Fourmen ceased work on the contract, we cannot determine whether this action was timely commenced. We note that although the parties did not address the bond’s accrual provision, since that issue is “apparent on the face of the record,” we address the issue in the exercise of our discretion *(Matter of Carlton v Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Town of Bedford,*111 AD2d 169, 170; *see Weiner v MKVII-Westchester,*292 AD2d 597, 598 [2002]).

The respondents’ remaining contentions are without merit. Prudenti, P.J., H. Miller, Spolzino and Lunn, JJ., concur.
§ 5.18 How does a debtor request a special review based on a change in circumstances such as catastrophic illness, divorce, death, or disability? ( a ) *Material change in circumstances.* A debtor who owes a Treasury debt may, at any time, request a special review by the applicable Treasury entity of the amount of any offset, administrative wage garnishment, or voluntary payment, based on materially changed circumstances beyond the control of the debtor such as, but not limited to, catastrophic illness, divorce, death, or disability.
( b ) *Inability to pay.* For purposes of this section, in determining whether an involuntary or voluntary payment would prevent the debtor from meeting essential subsistence expenses (costs incurred for food, housing, clothing, transportation, and medical care), the debtor shall submit a detailed statement and supporting documents for the debtor, his or her spouse, and dependents, indicating: ( 1 ) Income from all sources;
( 2 ) Assets;
( 3 ) Liabilities;
( 4 ) Number of dependents;
( 5 ) Expenses for food, housing, clothing, and transportation;
( 6 ) Medical expenses; and
( 7 ) Exceptional expenses, if any.
( c ) *Alternative payment arrangement.* If the debtor requests a special review under this section, the debtor shall submit an alternative proposed payment schedule and a statement to the Treasury entity collecting the debt, with supporting documents, showing why the current offset, garnishment or repayment schedule imposes an extreme financial hardship on the debtor. The Treasury entity will evaluate the statement and documentation and determine whether the current offset, garnishment, or repayment schedule imposes extreme financial hardship on the debtor. The Treasury entity shall notify the debtor in writing of such determination, including, if appropriate, a revised offset, garnishment, or payment schedule. If the special review results in a revised offset, garnishment, or repayment schedule, the Treasury entity will notify the appropriate agency or other persons about the new terms.