alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                         |   |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                                                                                         |   |   |   |
| /s/                William N. Plamondon, III                                                                 |   |   |   |
| William                N. Plamondon, IIIChief                Executive OfficerAugust                20, 2007 |   |   |        |

----
Ah amit
Hh, mee EY THANE SR reactortert

Pie, a
ie

%
3

Deirnee Hester |

5 yee

ee sou . 9 * 4
- .

wart
HLA’

° i: ihe
, ' SAE Cee] cS r
; oo he tor
# i byeig __i ae 4 a"|
# s 3 4
" ' H Mectar <y n pr
f : 3
: roa
} *=&
(uae \
4 bey, WAGES HECE
A {c
f : {
ioe { oy ‘ } BATHYMETRIC MAP
et are
i} z # Mentos > CHESAPEAKE BAY
| }} | ff Cy POCOMOKE SOUND - PLATE 12 Sn
1} Gg sa ‘ | 4  Crintew vec
Vit WV , | | 4 sn (Gee | MO? 10 BE USD Fok NaMGARON J
: Nt | ‘ °
i) | M \\, ; WE ol BATHYMETRY AT 2.METER INTERVALS eclegnign
} ; (a i << REFERENCED FROM MEAN LOW WATER F
(Cit Wit Lara" in ,
['}) | | i] * @ cionocs cee UNIVERSAL TRANSVERSE MERCATOR PROJECTION Ms
: 10) ie i mann
; f if © SCALE 1:50,000 dn
eS Ou Xf é We J
\ % \ PR Led =. ah. IR: See Se eee = re 4 yr ass —
jl ee i » in een oy ee a ; : a G |
| ag / en) tw " hs } ‘_ 4 peers ma othe
“+ j | = ' at 4

BERTH GRAEHENTS. te

AATINNETEN OF C*EMAPEARE Ba
Atm, sete Wain seca ||

Es *

POCOMOKE SOUND ~ PLATE 17
once 3200

ge set
EELE'SOFLO
"O'Brien, Colin" <cobrien@nrdc.org>
11/08/2010 11:16 PM To LisaP Jackson/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Group A-AND-R-DOCKET@EPA

cc "Walke, John" < j walke@nrdc.org>, "Kar, Avinash" <akar@nrdc.org>, "Davis, Emily" <edavis@nrdc.org> bcc Subject Petition for Reconsideration of Cement Kiln NESHAP

Please find attached a petition submitted on behalf of the Natural Resources Defense Council requesting that EPA reconsider its rulemaking titled: “National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry and Standards of Performance for Portland Cement Plants.” 75 Fed. Reg. 54970 (Sept. 9, 2010).
The objection raised in this petition concerns EPA’s promulgation of an affirmative defense of malfunction. The defense was first introduced in the final rule and, in finalizing it, EPA has invented an unlawful defense that does not exist in the Clean Air Act.
Respectfully submitted,

Colin O’Brien Natural Resources Defense Council 1200 New York Ave., NW, Suite 400 Washington, DC 20005 Ph: (202) 289-6868 cobrien@nrdc.org
§ 1.6 Administrative appeals. ( a ) *Requirements for making an appeal.* Before seeking review by a court of a component's adverse determination, a requester generally must first submit a timely administrative appeal. A requester may appeal any adverse determinations denying his or her request to the official specified in the appropriate appendix to this subpart. Examples of adverse determinations are provided in § 1.4(h) of this subpart. The requester must make the appeal in writing and to be considered timely it must be postmarked, or in the case of electronic submissions, transmitted, within 90 calendar days after the date of the component's final response. The appeal letter should clearly identify the component's determination that is being appealed and the assigned request number. The requester should mark both the appeal letter and envelope, or subject line of the electronic transmission, “Freedom of Information Act Appeal.”
( b ) *Adjudication of appeals.* ( 1 ) The FOIA appeal official or designee specified in the appropriate appendix will act on all appeals under this section.
( 2 ) An appeal ordinarily will not be adjudicated if the request becomes a matter of FOIA litigation.
( 3 ) On receipt of any appeal involving classified information, the FOIA appeal official or designee must take appropriate action to ensure compliance with applicable classification rules.
( c ) *Decision on appeals.* A decision on an appeal must be made in writing by the component within 20 business days after receipt of the appeal. A decision that upholds a component's determination must contain a statement that identifies the reasons for the affirmance, including any FOIA exemptions applied. The decision must provide the requester with notification of the statutory right to file a lawsuit and will inform the requester of the mediation services offered by the Office of Government Information Services of the National Archives and Records Administration as a non-exclusive alternative to litigation. If a component's decision is remanded or modified on appeal the requester will be notified of that determination in writing. The component will then further process the request in accordance with that appeal determination and respond directly to the requester. Appeals that have not been postmarked or transmitted within the specified time frame will be considered untimely and will be administratively closed with written notice to the requester.
( d ) *Engaging in dispute resolution services provided by Office of Government Information Services (OGIS).* Mediation is a voluntary process. If a component agrees to participate in the mediation services provided by OGIS, it will actively engage as a partner to the process in an attempt to resolve the dispute.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 346.11 Use of power of attorney.

No designation of an attorney, agent, or other representative to request payment or reissue on behalf of the owner, beneficiary, or other person entitled under § 346.9, other than as provided in these regulations, will be recognized.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Assistant Secretary Michele J. Sison Attends Francophonie Organization Meeting

# 									Assistant Secretary Michele J. Sison Attends Francophonie Organization Meeting							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

January 17, 2024

Assistant Secretary of State for International Organization Affairs Ambassador Michele J. Sison will travel January 18-19 to Paris, France to lead the U.S. delegation at the Organisation Internationale de la Francophonie (OIF) meeting on Haiti.  Assistant Secretary Sison will serve as a panelist alongside the Special Representative of the Secretary General for the United Nations Integrated Office in Haiti to discuss security in Haiti and the Multinational Security Support (MSS) mission to Haiti.  Assistant Secretary Sison will also meet with the French Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs on a variety of multilateral and UN issues.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of International Organization AffairsFranceHawaiiMultilateralOffice of the SpokespersonSecurityTravelUnited Nations

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Assistant Secretary of State Satterfield to Travel to New Zealand

# 									Assistant Secretary of State Satterfield to Travel to New Zealand							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

July 21, 2023

From July 23-29, Assistant Secretary of State for Educational and Cultural Affairs Lee Satterfield will travel to Wellington, New Zealand, where she will join Secretary Blinken and attend the 2023 FIFA Women’s World Cup to cheer on the U.S. Women’s National Team (USWNT). Click here to learn more about the Secretary’s upcoming travel.

On the margins of the World Cup, Assistant Secretary Satterfield will participate in a variety of engagements with local youth, alumni of U.S. sports diplomacy exchanges, and key private-sector stakeholders of the U.S. and international sports community. She will also attend bilateral meetings with the Government of New Zealand.

The Assistant Secretary’s trip emphasizes the importance of the bilateral relationship between the United States and New Zealand, as well as the important role sports play in supporting broader U.S. foreign policy goals including increasing access to education, economic equity, and societal opportunity and inclusion worldwide.

For further information, contact ECA-Press@state.gov. Follow along on Twitter at @ECA_AS.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of Educational and Cultural AffairsCivil SocietyEconomic AffairsEducationNew ZealandOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial International TravelSports

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                      5
<LEGEND>
(Replace this text with legend, if applicable)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                                 0000857615
<NAME>                                  Redwood Equipment Leasing Income Fund
<MULTIPLIER>                                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                          U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                        JAN-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                         SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                1
<CASH>                                                 2,719,367
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             33,098
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       2,752,465
<PP&E>                                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         4,575,918
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     33,848
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           4,575,918
<SALES>                                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         276,476
<CGS>                                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          82,518
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          193,958
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      193,958
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                             193,958
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              0.000
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0.000
        


</TABLE>
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Assistant Secretary for Economic and Business Affairs Ramin Toloui to Travel to South Africa and Nigeria for AGOA Forum, Creative Industries Events

# 									Assistant Secretary for Economic and Business Affairs Ramin Toloui to Travel to South Africa and Nigeria for AGOA Forum, Creative Industries Events							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

October 31, 2023

Assistant Secretary for Economic and Business Affairs Ramin Toloui will travel to South Africa and Nigeria November 1-9 to participate in multilateral fora and conduct bilateral diplomacy.

In South Africa, Assistant Secretary Toloui will attend the 20th United States-Sub-Saharan Africa Trade and Economic Cooperation Forum (AGOA Forum) meetings in Johannesburg.  He will co-chair a breakout session entitled Diversifying Global Supply Chains during the Forum and will host roundtables with business leaders within the technology, innovation, and intellectual property enforcement ecosystem on the margins of the Forum.  He will also conduct bilateral meetings with South African counterparts and those from African Growth and Opportunity Act beneficiary countries.

In Nigeria, Assistant Secretary Toloui will deliver a keynote address at the Africa Creative Markets Conference on the importance of intellectual property protection for the creative industries.  He will then meet with other strategic partners focused on the creative industries and intellectual property in Lagos.  In Abuja, he will conduct bilateral meetings with Nigerian counterparts.

For further information, please contact the Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs Media Team at EB-Press-Inquiry@state.gov.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsBureau of Economic and Business AffairsBusinessDiplomacyEconomic AffairsNigeriaOffice of Economic Policy Analysis and Public DiplomacyOffice of the SpokespersonSouth AfricaTravel

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
40115.

#### HARRELL v. THE STATE.

Frankum, Judge.

1. A confession, as related to criminal law, means the admission of every essential element necessary to establish the crime with which the defendant is charged. Any statement of the defendant which does not include every element necessary to make out the case against the defendant cannot be said to amount to an admission of guilt. A crime consists of something more than the mere commission of an act. There must be a union of the act with intention. *Owens v. State,*120 Ga. 296, 298-9 (48 SE 21).

2. Where the State relies upon extra-judicial statements of the accused alone to show intent to commit the crime charged and no other evidence is introduced to show such intent, and where the alleged confession of the defendant and his sworn *296testimony on the trial, considered together, amount to no more than the admission of the main fact (that is, the killing of the deceased) with the qualifying exclusion of the necessary ingredient of intent, and where there was nothing in the proofs submitted by the State which materially contradicted the defendant’s account of what occurred, even though the defendant’s admission and his testimony may seem unreasonable, where it is the only explanation the State is able to offer, it is insufficient to sustain a conviction of voluntary manslaughter. *Wall v. State,*5 Ga. App. 305, 308 (4) (63 SE 27).

Decided September 10, 1963.

*Leon A. Wilson, II, J. Edwin Peavy,*for plaintiff in error.

*Dewey Hayes, Solicitor General, M. C. Pritchard,*contra.

3. The uncontradicted evidence shows that the defendant shot the deceased when the deceased grabbed a rifle and was in the process of attempting to cock it and shoot the defendant. The deceased had already made an unprovoked attack on the defendant’s father, and the defendant, in his extra-judicial statements and in his sworn testimony on the trial, stated facts in support of his conclusion that he feared for his life and that of his father. After the shooting, the defendant and his father placed the deceased in the father’s automobile and delivered him to a hospital in Way cross, departing therefrom without identifying themselves to any of the hospital personnel or offering any explanation for the shooting. Several hours thereafter the defendant was apprehended at the home of his father, and at that time refused to make any statement, saying only that he desired to consult a lawyer. Later, however, he did make a statement and voluntarily submitted to a polygraph test under an agreement entered into between the solicitor and counsel for the defendant that the results thereof would be admitted in evidence on the trial. This test tended to exonerate the defendant. Under all the facts and circumstances of this case the conviction of voluntary manslaughter was not authorized, and it is unnecessary to consider any of the special assignments of error. See *Perry v. State,*185 Ga. 408, 411 (2) (195 SE 175); *Hudson v. State,*24 Ga. App. 310 (100 SE 784); *Thomas v. State,*86 Ga. App. 15 (70 SE2d 539); *Odom v. State,*106 Ga. App. 60 (126 SE2d 472).

*Judgment reversed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.*
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 308.3 Exchanges of denominations.

Pending availability of definitive securities, exchanges of authorized denominations of interim certificates, from higher to lower will be permitted.
#### Albino v. Floyd

*R. Eric Simons,*for plaintiff.

*Buchanan, Wallover & Barrickman,*for defendant.

October 26, 1953.

McCreary, P. J.,

Preliminary objections having been filed by defendant to the complaint in assumpsit filed in this case, on the ground that the service of the complaint on defendant is defective in that it was made upon him by the Sheriff of Beaver County mailing a certified copy of the complaint by registered mail to defendant at his residence in Follansbee, West Va., it is now ordered that the preliminary objections be sustained and that the purported service be stricken as being without authority in the law, there being no statute in Pennsylvania authorizing the sheriff to serve a nonresident of the State with a certified copy of a complaint by registered mail, in an action of assumpsit.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                          26,060
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,060
<PP&E>                                       1,145,579
<DEPRECIATION>                               (106,154)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,065,385
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,641,277
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,465,975
<OTHER-SE>                                 (8,046,502)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 (575,892)
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               106,779
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                36,871
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 69,908
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    69,908
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        



</TABLE>
# C_2020391EN.01000101.xml

| 16.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 391/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 391/1

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 10 November 2020

appointing the President of the Boards of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office

(2020/C 391/01)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2017 on the European Union trade mark (1), and in particular Article 166(1) thereof,

Whereas:

On 8 June 2020, the Council received from the Management Board of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) a list of candidates proposed for the post of President of the Boards of Appeal of the EUIPO,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

1.   Mr João Nuno MAROCO AMARAL NEGRÃO, born in Lisbon (Portugal) on 2 November 1970, is hereby appointed President of the Boards of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) for a term of five years.

2.   The date on which the five-year term referred to in paragraph 1 commences shall be determined by the Management Board of the EUIPO.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 10 November 2020.

For the Council

The President

M. ROTH

---

(1)  OJ L 154, 16.6.2017, p. 1.

1

---
**
**Exhibit 31.4**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Michael J. Rispoli,certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Newmark Group, Inc.for the year ended December 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof; and 

2. Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report. 

 
/S/ MICHAEL J. RISPOLI**Michael J. Rispoli****Chief Financial Officer**Date: April 29, 2019**
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 351.70 How are redemption values calculated for book-entry Series EE savings bonds?

We base current redemption values (CRV) for book-entry Series EE savings bonds on the definitive savings bond CRV. We use the CRV for a $100 principal amount as calculated in § 351.16 to calculate a CRV prorated to the book-entry principal investment amount for the corresponding issue and redemption dates. Calculated book-entry CRV will be rounded to the nearest one cent.[2] The formula is as follows:

[Book-entry principal investment ÷ $100] × [CRV value for $100 principal amount].

[68 FR 24796, May 8, 2003, as amended at 75 FR 52460, Aug. 26, 2010]

###### Footnotes -
  351.70

[2] Example: Calculated value of $25.044 rounds to $25.04; calculated value of $25.045 rounds to $25.05.