alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

Editorial Note on Part 360
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 360 appear at 79 FR 8860, Feb. 14, 2014.

§ 360.70 General rules governing entitlement. The rules in this section govern ownership or entitlement where one or both of the persons named on a bond have died without the bond having been surrendered for payment or reissue. Appropriate proof of death will be required. ( a ) *Single owner bond.* If the owner of a bond registered in single ownership form has died, the bond becomes the property of that decedent's estate, and payment or reissue will be made as provided in this subpart.
( b ) *Coowner bond* — ( 1 ) *One coowner deceased.* If one of the coowners named on a bond has died, the surviving coowner will be recognized as the sole and absolute owner, and payment or reissue will be made as though the bond were registered in the name of the survivor alone. Any request for reissue by the surviving coowner must be supported by proof of death of the other coowner.
( 2 ) *Both coowners deceased.* If both coowners named on a bond have died, the bond becomes the property of the estate of the coowner who died last, and payment or reissue will be made as if the bond were registered in the name of the last deceased coowner alone. Proof of death of both coowners will be required to establish the order of death.
( 3 ) *Simultaneous death of both coowners.* If both coowners die under conditions where it cannot be established, either by presumption of law or otherwise, which coowner died first, the bond becomes the property of the estates of both equally, and payment or reissue will be made accordingly.
( c ) *Beneficiary bond* — ( 1 ) *Owner deceased.* If the owner of a bond registered in beneficiary form has died and is survived by the beneficiary, upon proof of death of the owner, the beneficiary will be recognized as the sole and absolute owner of the bond. Payment or reissue will be made as though the bond were registered in the survivor's name alone. A request for payment or reissue by the beneficiary must be supported by proof of death of the owner.
( 2 ) *Beneficiary deceased.* If the beneficiary's death occurs before, or simultaneously with, that of the registered owner, payment or reissue will be made as though the bond were registered in the owner's name alone. Proof of death of the owner and beneficiary is required to establish the order of death.
( d ) *Nonresident aliens.* If the person who becomes entitled to a bond because of the death of an owner is an alien who is a resident of an area with respect to which the Department of the Treasury restricts or regulates the delivery of remittances, including checks and electronic payments, drawn against funds of the United States or its agencies or instrumentalities, delivery of the redemption payment will not be made so long as the restriction applies. See Department of the Treasury Circular No. 655, current revision (31 CFR part 211).
[63 FR 38049, July 14, 1998, as amended at 70 FR 57432, Sept. 30, 2005]
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 321.8 Redemption-exchange of Series E and EE savings bonds and savings notes. ( a ) *General.* Subject to the provisions of Circular No. 2-80 (31 CFR part 352), the governing regulations, and the provisions of this part and its appendix, an agent may make payment of eligible securities presented for redemption in exchange for Series HH bonds. Securities eligible for exchange are: ( 1 ) Series EE bonds bearing issue dates of January 1, 2003, or earlier, presented no earlier than six months from their issue dates;
( 2 ) Series EE bonds bearing issue dates of February 1, 2003, or thereafter, presented no earlier than 12 months from their issue dates; and
( 3 ) Series E bonds and savings notes presented no later than one year from the month in which they reached final maturity. The total redemption value of the securities presented for exchange must be at least $500.
( b ) *Requirements for redemption-exchange.* An agent shall not accept and redeem eligible securities on exchange unless: ( 1 ) The securities are accompanied by a completed exchange subscription signed by the presenter;
( 2 ) The presenter is the owner, the legal representative (excluding a representative of a decedent's estate), the surviving coowner or beneficiary, or the principal coowner (as defined in § 352.7(e)(2) in 31 CFR part 352 (Circular No. 2-80)) of the securities presented for exchange and is to be named as owner or first-named coowner on the Series HH bonds; and
( 3 ) The request for payment on each security is signed by the presenter. A presenter who is a legal representative should show the full title adjacent to each signature and, in the case of a corporate legal representative, should show the full corporate name, as well as the title. If the name of the presenter has been changed by marriage, or if the presenter is named as beneficiary or legal representative on the securities, the agent may process the transaction in accordance with the provisions of § 321.7 (b), (d), or (e) of this part. If the agent is authorized and elects to use the special endorsement procedure, set out in 31 CFR part 330 (Circular No. 888, current revision), the requests for payment do not need to be signed; however, this special endorsement may not be used in lieu of the presenter's signature on the exchange subscription.
( c ) *Interest reporting.* To the extent that it represents interest of $10 or more, a paying agent is required to report cash, refunded in an exchange transaction, to the presenter and to the Internal Revenue Service under the provisions of 26 CFR 1.6049-4.
( d ) *Completion of transaction.* An agent shall transmit for settlement eligible securities redeemed on exchange and, at the same time, forward the exchange application (PD F 3253) and any additional cash needed to complete the transaction to a TRS Site.
[53 FR 37511, Sept. 26, 1988, as amended at 55 FR 35396, Aug. 29, 1990; 59 FR 10537, Mar. 4, 1994; 68 FR 2666, Jan. 17, 2003; 68 FR 7427, Feb. 14, 2003; 77 FR 16166, Mar. 20, 2012]
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

###### Editorial Note on Part 363

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 363 appear at 70 FR 57433, Sept. 30, 2005, 70 FR 57442, Sept. 30, 2005, and 75 FR 70815, Nov. 19, 2010.

#### § 363.201 What other regulations govern book-entry marketable book-entry Treasury bills, notes, and bonds?

(a) 31 CFR part 356 governs the sale and issue of marketable book-entry Treasury securities on or after March 1, 1993, whether held in TreasuryDirect ®, Legacy Treasury Direct, or the commercial book-entry system.

(b) 31 CFR part 357 governs holding marketable book-entry Treasury bills, notes, and bonds in the Legacy Treasury Direct system and in the commercial book-entry system.
```

[House Report 113-440]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

113th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     113-440

======================================================================

 
   PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE BILL (H.R. 4438) TO AMEND THE 
   INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OF 1986 TO SIMPLIFY AND MAKE PERMANENT THE 
                            RESEARCH CREDIT

                                _______
                                

 May 6, 2014.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

                Mr. Cole, from the Committee on Rules, 
                        submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 569]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 569, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 4438, the 
American Research and Competitiveness Act of 2014, under a 
closed rule. The resolution provides 90 minutes of debate 
equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means. The 
resolution waives all points of order against consideration of 
the bill. The resolution provides that the amendment in the 
nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Ways and 
Means now printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted 
and the bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. The 
resolution waives all points of order against provisions in the 
bill, as amended. The resolution provides one motion to 
recommit with or without instructions.

                         EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

    The waiver of all points of order against consideration of 
the bill includes a waiver of section 311 of the Congressional 
Budget Act, which prohibits consideration of legislation that 
would cause revenues to be less than the level of total 
revenues set forth in the concurrent resolution on the budget.
    Although the resolution waives all points of order against 
provisions in the bill, as amended, the Committee is not aware 
of any points of order. The waiver is prophylactic in nature.

                                  

```
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Assistant Secretary Toloui’s Travel to San Francisco, Japan, Thailand and Singapore

# 									Assistant Secretary Toloui’s Travel to San Francisco, Japan, Thailand and Singapore							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

November 10, 2022

November 10-19, Assistant Secretary of State for Economic and Business Affairs Ramin Toloui will travel to San Francisco, Japan, Thailand, and Singapore, to meet with domestic and foreign government and business partners and discuss ideas for resolving shared economic challenges that will expand economic opportunities for U.S. businesses overseas and promote job creation at home.

November 10-11, Assistant Secretary Toloui will meet with semiconductor industry leaders in San Francisco to explore supply chain issues and opportunities to improve supply chain resilience.

November 13-15 in Tokyo, Assistant Secretary Toloui will discuss bilateral economic cooperation, including supply chain issues and semiconductors with his Japanese government counterparts and private sector partners.

November 16-17, Assistant Secretary Toloui will join the APEC CEO Summit in Bangkok to bolster economic opportunities and strengthen commercial ties in the region. The Assistant Secretary will highlight the United States’ role as the APEC host economy throughout 2023, including the next APEC Economic Leaders’ Meeting and CEO Summit. He will also exchange ideas with business leaders from APEC economies, about the global economy, future trade and investment, and innovative and scalable ways in which we can build sustainable economies, businesses and societies.

November 17-19 Assistant Secretary Toloui will engage with the government and private sector partners in Singapore on supply chain issues, food security, infrastructure development, and semiconductors. For further information, please contact the Economic Bureau at eb-a-pd-clearances@state.gov.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of Economic and Business AffairsCaliforniaJapanOffice of Public LiaisonOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial Domestic TravelOfficial International TravelSingaporeThailand

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases... Acting UN Special Representative of the Secretary-General Stephanie Turco Williams 

# 									 Acting UN Special Representative of the Secretary-General Stephanie Turco Williams 							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

February 6, 2021

The United States thanks Stephanie Turco Williams for her service in advancing peace as she departs her position as Acting UN Special Representative of the Secretary-General (SRSG) and Head of the UN Support Mission in Libya (UNSMIL).  In these roles, she displayed extraordinary diplomatic skills, demonstrating both creativity and tenacity to bring together Libyan parties within the framework of the UN-facilitated political process, resulting in the October 23 nationwide ceasefire agreement, the selection of leadership for a new executive authority, and the decision to hold national elections by the end of this year.  As the leadership of UNSMIL transitions, we encourage the Libyan people to build upon their achievements and continue working towards ending the conflict.  The United States supports the Libyan vision of a peaceful, prosperous, and unified Libya with an inclusive government that can both secure the country and meet the economic and humanitarian needs of its people. Ms. Williams’ service contributed to the realization of this vision, and she deserves our deepest gratitude. 

Tags

DiplomacyOffice of the SpokespersonPeacePeacebuildingThe Secretary of StateUnited Nations

Back to Top
Order entered July 3, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00340-CR

JANINE JOYCE CHARBONEAU, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 006-80751-2012

ORDER

Appellant’s June 26, 2014 motion for an extension of the time to file an amended reply 

brief is GRANTED. Appellant is granted permission to file an amended reply brief. 

Appellant’s amended reply brief shall be due by July 14, 2014.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
Home2019 Treaties and Agreements...Argentina (19-626) – Protocol Amending the Air Transport Agreement of October 22, 1985, as Amended

# 									Argentina (19-626) – Protocol Amending the Air Transport Agreement of October 22, 1985, as Amended							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

Transportation: Aviation Transport Services

Protocol signed at Washington June 26, 2019; entered in force June 26, 2019.
Download Agreement						 [1 MB]

Tags

ArgentinaTransportationTreaties

Back to Top
**Exhibit
32.1**
 
 Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
 Sarbanes
- Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of PLM Equipment Growth Fund V (the
“Partnership”), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, the President of the General Partner and of the Partnership, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
 
 (1)  the
Report of the Partnership filed today fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.
 
 
 
 
 /s/
James A. Coyne
 James A.
Coyne
 President
of PLM Financial Services, Inc
 May 10,
2005
HomeBiographies...Afreen Akhter

# 				Afreen Akhter			

															Deputy Assistant Secretary						Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs												

				April 25, 2022 -									Present							

Afreen Akhter is a Deputy Assistant Secretary in the Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs (SCA) for Nepal, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Bhutan, and the Maldives, as well as the Office of Security and Transnational Affairs. Ms. Akhter most recently served as a Senior Advisor to SCA Assistant Secretary Don Lu. Previously, Ms. Akhter was the National Security and Foreign Affairs Adviser to U.S. Senator Chris Van Hollen. Other assignments include the State Department’s Office of Pakistan Affairs, Political-Military Affairs Bureau, U.S. Embassy Beijing and the National Security Council. She was a Presidential Management Fellow and a Fulbright Scholar to Kingston, Jamaica. Ms. Akhter hails from Oak Brook, IL. She earned her M.A. in Public Policy from the Harvard Kennedy School of Government and her B.A. from Brown University.

Tags

Bureau of South and Central Asian AffairsState Department Official

Back to Top
§ 41.6694-4 Extension of period of collection when preparer pays 15 percent of a penalty for understatement of taxpayer's liability and certain other procedural matters. ( a ) *In general.* For rules relating to the extension of period of collection when a tax return preparer who prepared a return or claim for refund for excise tax under section 4481 pays 15 percent of a penalty for understatement of taxpayer's liability, and procedural matters relating to the investigation, assessment and collection of the penalties under section 6694(a) and (b), the rules under § 1.6694-4 of this chapter will apply.
( b ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section is applicable to returns and claims for refund filed, and advice provided, after December 31, 2008.
[T.D. 9436, 73 FR 78456, Dec. 22, 2008]
HomeAssisted Schools...Tunis, Tunisia: American Cooperative School of Tunis: 2024 Special Needs Profile

# 									Tunis, Tunisia: American Cooperative School of Tunis: 2024 Special Needs Profile							

Special Needs Profile

Office of Overseas Schools

February 23, 2024

## 								School Contact Information							

        -  Tel: +216-71-760-905 | Overseas Schools Fact Sheet | Regional Education Officer: Mike Emborsky 
        -  E-mail: school@acst.net | Website: www.acst.net 
        -  Additional details on special needs support at post found on the **School Summary Information Portal**(must have OKTA login to access).  For more information, contact A/OPR/OS (**overseasschools@state.gov** / +1-202-261-8200), MED/CFP Child and Family Program Team (**MEDCFP@state.gov**/ +1-202-663-1815), or the school directly.  “In addition to what is posted about mild to moderate learning issue, we also limit those needing learning support to 15-20% of any one classroom.”–ACST Representative    

**Download the Special Needs Profile** (Tunis- 2024 Special Needs-Tunisia) for this school to learn more about their capability to support students with exceptionalities.

 

**The American Cooperative School of Tunis**(ACST) is a private, coeducational day school, which offers an educational program from pre-kindergarten through grade 12 for students of all nationalities. The school was founded in 1959. The school year comprises two terms from late August to mid-June.

*This is intended to provide general information. Prospective users of the schools may wish to inquire further of A/OPR/OS or contact the school directly for more specific and up-to-the-minute information. Information and statistics are current as of December 2023 and provided by the school.*

NOTE: School situations can change quickly, particularly as schools face cutbacks to learning support programs due to the pandemic, unrest, and economic uncertainty. For the most current information, work with the REO and school. Information in this document was collected by the Department of State’s Office of Overseas Schools directly from the school in December 2023 and shows the availability of services rather than an assessment of the quality of the services. The profile is intended as a jumping off point for a conversation with the REO and school to understand the best fit for your child. Definitions may vary school to school.

Tags

Office of Overseas SchoolsTunisia

Back to Top
§ 19.145 Does this part address persons who are disqualified, as well as those who are excluded from nonprocurement transactions? Except if provided for in subpart J of this part, this part— ( a ) Addresses disqualified persons only to— ( 1 ) Provide for their inclusion in the *EPLS;* and
( 2 ) State responsibilities of Federal agencies and participants to check for disqualified persons before entering into covered transactions.
( b ) Does not specify the— ( 1 ) Department of the Treasury transactions for which a disqualified person is ineligible. Those transactions vary on a case-by-case basis, because they depend on the language of the specific statute, Executive order, or regulation that caused the disqualification;
( 2 ) Entities to which the disqualification applies; or
( 3 ) Process that the agency uses to disqualify a person. Unlike exclusion, disqualification is frequently not a discretionary action that a Federal agency takes.
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Protein Polymer Technologies,
        Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30,
        2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
        hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
        U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
        the Company.



        /s/  J. Thomas Parmeter
        -----------------------
           J. Thomas Parmeter
           President and Chief Executive Officer
           November 13, 2002
#### Sherri Wright BUFFKIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SMITHFIELD PACKING COMPANY, INCORPORATED; Jere Null, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-1813.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 29, 2002.

Decided June 24, 2002.

*706Sherri Wright Buffkin, Appellant Pro Se. James Columcille Dever, III, Gretchen W. Ewalt, Maupin, Taylor & Ellis, P.A., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before WIDENER, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Sherri Wright Buffkin appeals the district court’s order (1) granting summary judgment in her former employer’s favor on her claims alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, on the ground that she failed to exhaust her administrative remedies, and (2) declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over her state law claims. When the district court rendered its decision, however, that court did not have the benefit of the Supreme Court’s decision in *Edelman v. Lynchburg College,*— U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 1145, 152 L.Ed.2d 188 (2002) (upholding regulation permitting verification of a timely filed charge after the time for filing has expired). We therefore vacate the district court’s order and remand for further proceedings under *Edelman.*We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*VACATED AND REMANDED.*