alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 157 (Monday, August 17, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 41374]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19676]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1641]


Expansion of Foreign-Trade Zone 57, Charlotte, North Carolina, 
Area

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, the North Carolina Department of Commerce, grantee of 
Foreign-Trade Zone 57, submitted an application to the Board for 
authority to expand its zone to include an additional site (Site 16) in 
the Charlotte, North Carolina area, adjacent to the Charlotte Customs 
and Border Protection port of entry (FTZ Docket 62-2008, filed 10/28/
08);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (73 FR 65583, 11/4/08), and the application has been processed 
pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations;
    Whereas, on April 24, 2009, the grant of authority was reissued to 
the Charlotte Regional Partnership, Inc. (Board Order 1613, 74 FR 
21622, 05/8/09); and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the 
public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to expand FTZ 57 is approved, subject to the FTZ 
Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28, and subject 
to a sunset provision that would terminate authority for Site 16 on 
August 31, 2014, if no activity has occurred under FTZ procedures 
before that date.
    Signed at Washington, DC, this 5th day of August 2009.

Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, 
Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
    Attest:
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-19676 Filed 8-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
# L_2020141DE.01003901.xml

| 5.5.2020 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 141/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2020

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 141/39

---

Berichtigung der Delegierten Verordnung (EU) 2019/981 der Kommission vom 8. März 2019 zur Änderung der Delegierten Verordnung (EU) 2015/35 zur Ergänzung der Richtlinie 2009/138/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates betreffend die Aufnahme und Ausübung der Versicherungs- und der Rückversicherungstätigkeit (Solvabilität II)

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 161 vom 18. Juni 2019
  )

Seite 64, Anhang IX zur Ersetzung von Anhang XIV der Delegierten Verordnung (EU) 2015/35 Überschrift:

Anstatt:

„
  SEGMENTIERUNG DER VERSICHERUNGS- UND -RÜCKVERSICHERUNGSVERPFLICHTUNGEN DER KRANKENVERSICHERUNG NACH ART DER SCHADENVERSICHERUNG UND STANDARDABWEICHUNGEN FÜR DAS UNTERMODUL PRÄMIEN- UND RÜCKSTELLUNGSRISIKO DER KRANKENVERSICHERUNG NACH ART DER SCHADENVERSICHERUNG
  “

muss es heißen:

„
  SEGMENTIERUNG DER VERSICHERUNGS- UND RÜCKVERSICHERUNGSVERPFLICHTUNGEN DER KRANKENVERSICHERUNG, DIE AUF VERGLEICHBARER VERSICHERUNGSTECHNISCHER BASIS BETRIEBEN WIRD WIE DIE SCHADENVERSICHERUNG, UND STANDARDABWEICHUNGEN FÜR DAS UNTERMODUL PRÄMIEN- UND RÜCKSTELLUNGSRISIKO EINER SOLCHEN KRANKENVERSICHERUNG
  “.

---
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 375.23 How does the securities delivery process work?

If any of the offers you submitted are accepted, you must transfer the correct book-entry Treasury securities in the correct par amount against the correct settlement amount on the settlement date. You must deliver the securities to the account specified in the redemption operation announcement.
#### § 50.111 Notice to Congress.

Pursuant to section 103(e)(3) of the Act, the Secretary shall provide an initial notice to Congress within 15 days of the certification of an act of terrorism, stating whether the Secretary estimates that aggregate insured losses will exceed $100,000,000,000 for the calendar year in which the event occurs. Such initial estimate may be based on insured loss amounts as compiled by insurance industry statistical organizations, data previously collected by the Secretary, and any other information the Secretary in his or her discretion considers appropriate. The Secretary shall also notify Congress if estimated or actual aggregate insured losses exceed $100,000,000,000 during any calendar year.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 215.6 Parties.

The parties to this agreement are the Secretary and the State, city or county which has entered into this agreement pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 5516, 5517, or 5520 and Executive Order 11997 (June 22, 1977).

[42 FR 33731, July 1, 1977. Redesignated at 71 FR 2150, Jan. 13, 2006]
### International strategic minerals inventory summary report; vanadium

By: I. GoldbergE.C.I. HammerbeckL.S. LabuschagneC. Rossouw

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir930K

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 351.12 What do I need to know about the long-term savings bond rate, to understand redemption value calculations in this subpart?

We determine this rate by compiling 5-year Treasury securities rates as of the close of business for each day of the previous six months and calculating the monthly average for each month, rounding each monthly average to the nearest one-hundredth of one percent. We then determine the long-term savings bond rate by taking 85 percent of the 6-month average and rounding the result to the nearest one-hundredth of one percent. For bonds entitled to interest accruals at the long-term savings bond rate, that rate applies to the bond's first full semiannual interest accrual period following each announcement of the rate.
Memo to: EPA Docket (EPA-EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0788)

Subject: Meeting on Notice of Proposed Rulemaking f or “Health and Environmental
Protection Standards for Uranium and Thorium Mill T ailings,” 40 CFR Part 192

On April 14, 2015 EPA staff members met with repres entatives of the Texas Council on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) at the Embassy Suites Hotel in Corpus Christi, Texas. to discuss the proposed rulemaking “Health and Environmental P rotection Standards for Uranium and Thorium Mill Tailings”(40 CFR Part 192). The follow ing persons participated in the meeting:

Texas Council on Environmental Quality (TCEQ):

Mr. Charles Maguire, Director, Radioactive Material s Division, Office of Waste.

Mr. Dale Kohler, Critical Infrastructure Liaison

EPA:

Anthony Nesky, Center for Radiation Information and Outreach, EPA Radiation
Protection Division

Tom Peake, Director, Center for Waste Management an d Regulations, EPA Radiation
Protection Division

Ingrid Rosencrantz, Center for Waste Management and Regulations, EPA Radiation
Protection Division

In the meeting, TCEQ representatives discussed thei r desire to see an effective regulatory framework if the proposed rulemaking were to become a final rule. EPA encouraged TCEQ to submit detailed comments on the proposal.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1346 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1346

  To amend the guarantee fee provisions of the Federal Ship Mortgage 
          Insurance program in the Merchant Marine Act, 1936.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 1995

 Mr. Spence (for himself, Mr. Dellums, Mr. Bateman, and Mr. Taylor of 
Mississippi) (all by request) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on National Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the guarantee fee provisions of the Federal Ship Mortgage 
          Insurance program in the Merchant Marine Act, 1936.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMPUTATION OF FEE FOR LOAN GUARANTEES UNDER TITLE XI OF 
              MERCHANT MARINE ACT, 1936.

    Section 1104A(e) of title XI of the Merchant Marine Act, 1936 (46 
App. U.S.C. 1274(e)) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(e) Guarantee Fees.--The Secretary is authorized to fix a fee for 
the guarantee of an obligation under this title. All guarantee fees 
shall be computed and shall be payable to the Secretary under such 
regulations as the Secretary may prescribe: Provided, That the rate 
governing such a fee shall not be less than \3/4\ of 1 percent per 
annum nor more than 1\1/2\ percent per annum; and: Provided, further, 
That when moneys are first advanced under a guaranteed obligation, the 
project's entire fee payment shall be made by the obligor to the 
Secretary in an amount equal to the sum of the present value of the 
separate products obtained by applying the guarantee fee rate to the 
projected amount of the guaranteed obligations outstanding, excluding 
the average amount (except interest) on deposit in the escrow fund 
created under section 1108 of this Act, for each year of the stated 
maturity of the guarantee obligation. Such regulations shall provide 
that the discount rate for calculating the present value of each 
product shall be a rate determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, 
taking into consideration current market yields on outstanding 
obligations of the United States of comparable maturity. Such 
regulations shall also provide a formula for determining the 
creditworthiness of obligors under which the most creditworthy obligors 
pay a fee computed on the lowest allowable percentage and the least 
creditworthy obligors pay a fee which may be computed on the highest 
allowable percentage. Under no circumstances may the Secretary refund 
the guarantee fee to the obligor. A guarantee fee paid pursuant to this 
section may be included in actual cost and is eligible to be financed 
under this title.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Sergio A. SALDIVAR, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.

No. 02-3062.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 5, 2002.

Before MAYER, Chief Judge, LOURIE, and LINN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Sergio A. Saldivar seeks review of the September 7, 2001, decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, No. DA0752980190C-1, dismissing his petition for enforcement as untimely filed. We *affirm.*

Saldivar appealed his removal from the position of customs inspector with the Department of the Treasury. Ultimately, the board ordered that he be reinstated with back pay from the date of his dismissal to the date of reinstatement. In its order, the board specifically informed Saldivar that if he believed the agency did not fully comply with its order, he could file a petition for enforcement no later than 30 days after the agency notified him that it had complied. The agency sent Saldivar a letter on November 10, 1999, informing him of the amount of back pay that it had calculated and stating that the funds would be deposited into his account. The letter also stated the agency had complied with the board’s order. After several letters from Saldivar’s representative inquiring about the amount paid, the agency sent another letter on March 3, 2000, responding that it had fully complied with the board’s order and that no further action would be taken. On July 27, 2000, Saldivar filed a petition for enforcement, which the board dismissed as untimely filed because he had failed to show good cause for the delay as required by 5 C.F.R. § 1201.182(a).

Our review is limited to setting aside any action that is “(1) arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law; (2) obtained without procedures required by law, rule, or regulation having been followed; or (3) unsupported by substantial evidence.” 5 U.S.C. § 7703(c) (2000).

Saldivar failed to show good cause why his petition was filed late. He was on notice as of November 10, 1999, that the agency believed that it had fully complied with the board’s order, yet he did not file his petition until July of the following year. “[WJhether the regulatory time limit for an appeal [of an agency action] should be waived based upon a showing of good *525cause is a matter committed to the Board’s discretion and this court will not substitute its own judgment for that of the Board.” *Mendoza v. Merit Systems Prot. Bd.,*966 F.2d 650, 653 (Fed.Cir.1992). There is no evidence that the board abused its discretion.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

O. L., 

 

 Appellant,

v.

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY 

AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-14-00184-CV

Appeal from the

65th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2012DCM09529)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS D’Anne Asleson’s first request for an extension of time within 

which to file the Reporter’s Record until July 11, 2014. NO FURTHER REQUESTS FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE REPORTER’S RECORD WILL BE CONSIDERED 

BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that D’Anne Asleson, Official Court Reporter for the 65th Child 

Protection Court for El Paso County, Texas, prepare the Reporter’s Record and forward the same 

to this Court on or before July 11, 2014.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 2

nd day of July, 2014.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera and Rodriguez, JJ.
From: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US

To: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Deirdre Murphy/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Nealson Watkins/RTP/USEPA/US@EP

Date: 01/27/2011 06:54 AM

Subject: Re: Answers to your cost questions on the CO NAAQS monitoring network

Thanks a lot Heidi. I'll lo forward to hearing from you this morning.
#### George W. Carroll *vs.*The Shetucket Realty Company et al.

Maltbie, C. J., Haines, Hinman, Banks and Avery, Js.

Argued June 13th

decided July 16th, 1934.

*George C. Morgan,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

*Arthur M. Brown,*with whom, on the brief, was *Charles V. James,*for the appellee (defendant).

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff owned certain shares of stock of the defendant The Shetucket Realty Company which he transferred to the defendant George W. Carroll, Jr. The company is in process of liquidation and *716a considerable sum of money is being held by it to be paid to the owner of the stock in question. The plaintiff brought this action in the nature of an inter-pleader claiming that the beneficial interest in the stock belonged to him. The trial court found that the plaintiff had given it to his son. The testimony was conflicting and the finding has ample support in the evidence of the son. The plaintiff, however, contends that the trial court did not properly weigh the evidence. The testimony of the plaintiff was by a deposition taken in California, whereas the son appeared in person. The trial court in its memorandum of decision commented upon the fact of the plaintiff’s failure to appear as a witness and upon the impression of veracity which the son had made. The weight to be given to the evidence of any particular witness often depends upon the impression he gives of honesty and accuracy and necessarily when a witness testifies by deposition he loses the opportunity of creating a favorable impression of that nature. It is inherent in a situation of sharp conflict in the testimony of the parties to the action, where they are substantially the only witnesses as to the essential issue, as was the situation here, that the party who gives his evidence by deposition is put at a disadvantage. The trial court went no farther in its memorandum than to recognize that fact, except perhaps for a suggestion that, had the plaintiff seen fit to appear, any disadvantage of this nature would have been avoided. We cannot find error in the manner in which the trial court weighed the evidence. 23 C. J. p. 38. So far as the other assignments of error find support in the record they are without merit and there is no need to consider claims first appearing in the briefs of counsel.

There is no error.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 306.116 Scope and effect of book-entry procedure. ( a ) Except as provided in § 306.117, the provisions of 31 CFR part 357, subparts A, B, and D apply.
( b ) This subpart is effective January 1, 1997.
[61 FR 43637, Aug. 23, 1996]
The Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission (CFTC) is the 

federal government agency 

that regulates the commodity 

futures, commodity options, 

and swaps trading markets. 

The CFTC wants you to be aware 

of a type of fraud that involves 

individuals and firms offering 

investments in commodity pools.

ContaCt us

if you have questions, are aware of suspicious 

activities, or believe you have been defrauded, 

please let the CFtC know immediately. Call the 

CFtC or visit www.cftc.gov/tiporComplaint.

Commodity Pool 

Fraud

Commodity Futures trading Commission

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

866.366.2382 (Consumer Hotline)

202.418.5514 (TTY)

consumers@cftc.gov

www.cftc.gov/consumerprotection 

Commodity Futures trading Commissio

43909_CommodityPool.indd 1 2/12/13 
Commodity Pools

 Commodity pool operators are persons or firms 

that raise funds and pool them together to 

trade commodity futures and options.

 Most fraudulent commodity pools involve 

unregistered operators.

 Many commodity pool operators advertise and 

solicit investors based on false claims of high 

profits and low risk.

 In fraudulent commodity pools, the funds 

are often misused and spent on improper 

expenses. 

signs oF a Possible Fraudulent 

sales PitCh

 Leading you to believe you can profit from current news already known to the public.

“As a result of that hurricane, the price of oil 

futures will increase substantially.”

 Made through word of mouth referrals or emails 

from friends, relatives, members of churches 

or social groups—one fraudulent pool operator 

even solicited his cancer support group.

 Claiming to know unique market trends or to 

have a record of highly profitable trading.

 Promising quick, large and guaranteed returns.

 Contacting you asking for personal information 

such as your full name, phone number, email 

or home address.

 Requesting cash immediately.

Ask how the product meets your financial needs.

43909_CommodityPool.indd 2 2/12/13
HomeBiographies...Barbara Feinstein

# 				Barbara Feinstein			

															Deputy Assistant Secretary for Caribbean Affairs and Haiti						Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs												

				March 1, 2022 -									Present							

Barbara A. Feinstein, a career member of the Senior Executive Service, is the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Caribbean Affairs and Haiti. Ms. Feinstein most recently served as Deputy Assistant Administrator for Caribbean Affairs, Haiti, Cuba, Mexico, and Central America with the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). She has held various leadership positions with USAID, including as Senior Deputy Assistant Administrator for Legislative Affairs; Deputy Chief of Staff to Administrator Rajiv Shah, Chief of Staff and Senior Policy Advisor to Acting Administrator Alonzo Fulgham; and Special Assistant to Administrator Henrietta Fore. Other assignments include service with the U.S. Departments of State and Defense.

Ms. Feinstein has served on the professional staff of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on State and Foreign Operations and the House International Relations Committee of the United States Congress.

She holds a Master’s degree in International and Public Affairs from Princeton University and a Bachelor of Arts in Latin American Studies, Spanish and Portuguese from the University of California-Berkeley.

Ms. Feinstein speaks Spanish and Portuguese.

Tags

Bureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsState Department Official

Back to Top
II

Calendar No. 277

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 111

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 8, 1995

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and

Administration

DECEMBER 14, 1995

Reported by Mr. WARNER, without amendment

JOINT RESOLUTION

Providing for the appointment of Anne D’Harnoncourt as

a citizen regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Stat4 utes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on

5 the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in

6 the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by

7 reason of the expiration of the term of Samuel Curtis
2

HJ 111 RS

1 Johnson of Wisconsin on December 4, 1995, is filled by

2 the appointment of Anne D’Harnoncourt of Pennsylvania.

3 The appointment is for a term of six years and shall take

4 effect on December 5, 1995.

Passed the House of Representatives November 7,

1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.

Calendar No. 277

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 111

JOINT RESOLUTION

Providing for the appointment of Anne

of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.D’Harnoncourt as a citizen regent of the Board

DECEMBER 14, 1995

Reported without amendment
UNITED STATES

BATHYMETRIC MAP

Puthened at Wesheupen, tC
US DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
NANOWAL DCEAMC AND PTC ADRUNISTRATION
MATONAL OCEAN SERVICT
1983

aarerartec SETUEVAL. A METERS TO MaKauue TPT
AFL TED YG oA TLA rations

wh Lew welt

GULF OF MENCO
ATWATER

ATWATER
NOS NG 16-1