# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 4- 12 95

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca

ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el le e

v.
Larry Bi g B oy

ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe ll an t

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Dis tri ct of S ou th Dako ta - Rap id Cit y

__ __ __ __ __ __ Su bm it te d: Ju ne 24 , 20 14 Fi le d: Nov em

be r 20 , 20 14 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re GRUENDER, BOW MAN, an d S HEPHERD, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __
PER CURI AM.

W hi le Larry Bi g Bo y was se rv in g a pe ri o d o f su pe rv is ed rel eas e fo ll owi ng rel eas e fro m im

pr is on m en t on a co nv i c t i o n f o r at te m pt in g to se xu al ly en ga ge inc o n t a c t w i th a m in or , th e di st ric t co ur t fo un d he ha d vi ol at ed a co nd it io n of h i s 1

s u pe rv is ed rel eas e an d im po se d a rev oc at io n se nt en ce co ns is ti ng of 6 m on th s i n pr is on an d 2 y ears of su pe rv is ed rel eas e. On ap pe al , B i g B o y’s co un se l m ov es to wit hd raw, an d rai se s two arg um en ts : (1 ) th e re v o c a t i o n pr is on se nt en ce is

un reas on ab le an d (2 ) th e co ur t ab us ed it s di sc ret io n by co nt in ui ng al l o f th e

co nd i t i o n s o f su pe rv is ed rel eas e fro m Bi g Bo y ’s or ig in al te rm , wit ho ut as se ss in g whe th er ea ch co nd it io n was st il l n eces sa ry

.

Si nc e br ie fin g i n th is cas e was co m pl et ed , co un se l fo r Bi g Bo y ad vi se d th e Co ur t th at Bi g Bo y ha s co m pl et ed hi s si x- m on th rev oc at io n pr is on se nt en ce an d th at th e is su e of th e reas on ab le ne ss of th e pr is on se nt en ce is no w m oo t. Acco rd in gl y , th e ap pe al as t o t hi s i ss ue is di sm is se d a s m oo t.

At th e rev oc at io n he ari ng , Bi g Bo y di d no t vo ic e an y c o n c e r n s ab ou t th e pr op rie t y o f t h e rei m

po se d rel eas e co nd it io ns , an d th e co ur t di d no t err, pl ai nl y or ot he rwis e, in no t ex am in in g su a sp on te whe th er th e co nd it io ns were st il l warra nt ed

. See Uni te d St at es v. Si m on s, 61 4 F.3 d 47 5, 47 8- 81 (8 th Ci r. 20 10 ); Uni te d St at es v. Leb eau , 49 0 Fed

. App x. 83 1, 83 2 (8 th Ci r. 2 0 1 2) (u np ub li sh ed pe r cu ria m ) (d efen da nt sh ou ld no t be ne fit fro m su pe rv is e d r e l e as e vi ol at io ns , whe re sp eci al

co nd it io ns of su pe rv is ed rel eas e wou ld ha ve rem ai ne d in effe ct at ti m e in qu es ti on if de fen da nt ha d n ot vi ol at ed su pe rv is ed rel eas e). Acco rd in gl y , we affi rm

.

As to co un se l’s m ot io n to wit hd r a w , w e co nc lu de th at al lo win g co un se l to

w i t hd raw at th is ti m e wou ld no t be co ns is te nt wit h th e Eig ht h Ci rcu it ’s 19 9 4 Am en dm en t to Part V of th e Pl an to Im pl em en t th e Cri m in al Ju st ic e Act of 19 64

. W e

The Hon or ab le Karen E. Sch rei er, Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e Dis tri ct 1 of So ut h Dak ot a.
-2

-th eref

or e de ny co un se l’s m ot io n to wit hd raw as pr em at ur e, wit h o u t p r e jud ic e to

co un se l re fil in g t he m ot io n u po n fu lfi ll in g t he du ti es set for th in th e Am en dm en t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-3

-