alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Assistant Secretary of State for the Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs Lu’s Travel to India and Maldives

# 									Assistant Secretary of State for the Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs Lu’s Travel to India and Maldives							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

January 26, 2024

Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asian Affairs Donald Lu will travel to India and Maldives January 26-31.

While in India, Assistant Secretary Lu will lead a U.S. delegation’s participation at the India-U.S. Forum in New Delhi.  Assistant Secretary of State for Energy Resources Geoffrey R. Pyatt will also participate.  The delegation will engage with Indian government officials and members of the private sector, academia, and media to discuss and enhance opportunities for partnership between the United States and India.

The Assistant Secretary and delegation will then travel to Maldives, where they will meet with senior Maldivian officials to build U.S.-Maldives cooperation and to advance the establishment of a permanent U.S. Embassy space in Malé.  The delegation will also engage with members of civil society and higher education officials.

For further information, please contact SCA-Press@state.gov.

Tags

Bureau of South and Central Asian AffairsIndiaMaldivesOffice of the Spokesperson

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
#### § 34.304 Grant award process—Direct Component.

Upon determining that the Multiyear Implementation Plan and the grant application meet the requirements of these regulations and the Act, Treasury will execute a grant agreement with the recipient that complies with subpart I of this part, the Act, and other Federal laws and policies on grants.
|    |                                                                                                                  |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Neon Therapeutics, Inc.; and |
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |

|                      |
|----------------------|
|                      |  |  |
| Date: April 21, 2020 | By: | /s/ Hugh O'Dowd |
|                 |   | Hugh O’Dowd |
|                 |   | President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Assistant Secretary Phee’s Travel to Namibia

# 									Assistant Secretary Phee’s Travel to Namibia							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

November 4, 2023

Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs Molly Phee will travel to Namibia from November 5 – 10, 2023. During this trip, she will consult with Namibian leaders on global and local priorities and common interests, including health, food security, and energy issues. While in Namibia, the Assistant Secretary will visit education, health, and wildlife conservation sites that receive support from the U.S. government. She will also meet with Namibian entrepreneurs and innovators.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsNamibiaOffice of the Spokesperson

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
40152.

#### HOWARD, Administrator v. PATE.

Jordan, Judge.

On June 29, 1962, George W. Howard, Jr., as temporary administrator of the estate of George W. Howard, Sr., filed an intervention in a condemnation proceeding, where the land had been taken and the purchase money paid into court, seeking to subject the funds to the payment of a judgment in favor of the decedent and against the condemnee’s grantor on the ground that the conveyance of the condemned lands to the condemnee by the judgment-debtor of the intervenor’s decedent had been made for the purpose of hindering, delaying and defrauding said deceased judgment creditor. The intervention alleged that the conveyance was made “shortly after or before said judgment” which was entered prior to the death of the judgment creditor in January, 1957; and it was further alleged that said judgment was “still in force and revivable.” The exception is to the judgment of the Superior Court of Crisp County sustaining the condemnee’s general demurrers to the petition and dismissing same.

This case was transferred to this court by the Supreme Court. See *Howard v. Pate,*218 Ga. 741 (130 SE2d 752). *Held:*

Construing the intervenor’s petition most strongly against the pleader for purposes of ruling on the demurrers, the legal effect of the allegation that the decedent’s judgment against the condemnee’s grantor was “revivable” is that said judgment was dormant at the time the intervention was filed but that the same was capable of being revived during the three-year statutory period in an appropriate action. See *Code Ann.*§§ 110-1001, 110-1002. A dormant judgment may not be enforced, however, except by scire facias to revive it or by suit on said judgment within the prescribed time. *Clark v. Shouse,*149 Ga. 59 (3) (99 SE 31).

Accordingly, the intervention which sought to subject the funds *51in the registry of the court to the payment of a dormant judgment, without any revival of said judgment and without suing upon it, was properly dismissed on demurrer. *Palmer v. Inman,*126 Ga. 519 (2) (55 SE 229).

Decided June 18, 1963.

*Benjamin Zussman,*for plaintiff in error.

*Wright & Reddick, George P. Wright,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Frankum, J., conavr.*
# Map            Iraq.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000858346
<NAME> WEST COAST REALTY

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,671,947
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  301,953
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,973,900
<PP&E>                                      41,901,909
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,550,077
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              42,156,493
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          634,619
<BONDS>                                     20,369,835
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        29,280
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,122,759
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                42,156,493
<SALES>                                      1,085,540
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,110,736
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               374,637
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             369,774
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                366,325
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            366,325
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   366,325
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 315.48 Restrictions on reissue. ( a ) *Denominational exchange.* Reissue is not permitted solely to change denominations.
( b ) *United States Treasury.* Reissue may not be made to eliminate the United States Treasury as coowner or beneficiary.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Velocity Financial, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christopher D. Farrar, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|        |               |        |        |                               |
|--------|---------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------|
|   |          |   |   |                          |
| Date:  | April 7, 2020 |   | By:    | /s/ Christopher D. Farrar     |
|   |          |   |   | Christopher D. Farrar         |
|   |          |   |   | Chief Executive Officer       |
|   |          |   |   | (Principal Executive Officer) |
Flight Checklist

LED

Motors inactive, safe to 

handle

Low battery, automatic landing

Loss of RC signal, automatic landing

System error, see troubleshooting guide

Loss of GPS signal, switch to manual

Initializing, please wait

Acquiring GPS, please wait

Autopilot ready, GPS locked

Armed

Safety Button

Motors active, deactivate before 

handling (see reverse)

Flight Modes

Return to launch

RTL

land at the launch point

Standard position 

(altitude hold mode)

STD

fly manually

Loiter mode

LTR

hover

!

Stand back!

4 6

The motors are 

now active.

Hold left stick downright until motors spin.

1 2 Power on controller;

set to STD and RTL OFF.

Arm 

motors.

Press and hold safety 

button until solid red.

Connect 

charged battery.

Choose a clear launch 

point, and face IRIS 

away from you. 

5 Check 3 LED.

Place IRIS at 

launch point.

Go outside to 

an open area!

Auto mode

AUTO

fly a mission

©2014 3D Robotics. vA. All rights reserved.

Control gimbal

TILT

tilt the camera down and up

Land

CH7

land at the current position
Press and hold until 

blinking red to deactivate.

Hold left stick downleft until motors stop. 

1 2 Disarm 

motors.

Press safety 

button. 3 Disconnect battery. 4Power off 

controller. Postflight

Controller Flight Data

Press and hold the DN button to access the flight data screens. 

Press DN again to toggle between screens.

Lower left stick below 

center to descend.

Set left stick fully down to 

land when near the ground.

Raise left stick above 

center to take off and 

gain altitude.

Move left stick left 

and right to rotate.

Use right stick to fly forward, 

backward, left, and right.

Set left stick to center 

to maintain altitude.

Flight

current flight mode

controller battery level (9-12 V)

GPS signal strength in # of 

satellites

meters from launch point

flight battery level (10.5-12.6 V)

connection strength

current latitude

current longitude

altitude in meters

flight time

altitude in meters

For customer support, contact us at help@3dr.com

or call our support line at +1 (858) 225-1414 

Monday through Friday, from 8 am to 5 pm, PST.

3dr.com/iris/info 

GPS status

speed in m/s

flight battery mAh 

consumed since armed

End your flight at 10.7 V.

Do not exceed 4000 mAh for 

a fully charged IRIS+ battery 

(80% of available capacity).

!
- Division Home
- About Us
- Remarks and Releases
- Contact Us

HomeDivision for Counter Threat Finance and Sanctions...About Us – Division for Counter Threat Finance and Sanctions

# 									About Us							

Division for Counter Threat Finance and Sanctions

Counter Threat Finance and Sanctions is composed of two offices:

The Office of Global Sanctions and Threat Finance (GST) advances policies that seek to cut off the funding available to a variety of groups that pose a threat to domestic, international, and regional security. GST coordinates the Department’s work on  global economic sanctions programs and oversees the Department’s work on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terror (AML/CFT) issues.  GST leads the Department’s participation in the Global Magnitsky sanctions program, blocking the property of persons involved in serious human rights abuse or corruption.  GST also has the primary designation authority for hostage and wrongful detention sanctions and is the Department lead for cybersecurity and elections interference sanctions programs.

The Office of Economic Sanctions Policy and Implementation (SPI) is responsible for developing and implementing country-specific sanctions policies designed to counter threats to national security.  SPI coordinates the Department’s work within the U.S. interagency and engages with partners and allies to strengthen the use and sanctions and align efforts to maximize impacts of collective efforts.

Tags

Conflict DiamondsCounterterrorismFinanceSanctionsSecurity

## Related Articles

-  											 													About Us			
Read more
 

Back to Top
HomeAssisted Schools...Managua, Nicaragua: American Nicaraguan School: 2024 Special Needs Profile

# 									Managua, Nicaragua: American Nicaraguan School: 2024 Special Needs Profile							

Special Needs Profile

Office of Overseas Schools

February 29, 2024

## 								School Contact Information							

        -  Tel: +505-8864-6368 | Overseas Schools Fact Sheet | Acting Regional Education Officer: Mike Emborsky 
        -  E-mail: communications@ans.edu.ni | Website: www.ans.edu.ni| Special needs information can be found at www.ans.edu.ni/inclusion. 
        -  Additional details on special needs support at post found on the **School Summary Information Portal**(must have OKTA login to access).  For more information, contact A/OPR/OS (**overseasschools@state.gov** / +1-202-261-8200), MED/CFP Child and Family Program Team (**MEDCFP@state.gov**/ +1-202-663-1815), or the school directly. 

**Download the Special Needs Profile (Managua- 2024 Special Needs- Nicaragua**) for this school to learn more about their capability to support students with exceptionalities.

 

The **American Nicaraguan School**(ANS) is a private, nonprofit, coeducational day school founded in 1944 to provide a college-preparatory American educational program from nursery (kindergarten age three) through grade 12 for students of all nationalities. The school community includes members of the diplomatic corps, foreign and local businesses, Nicaraguan government, and various international assistance groups working in Nicaragua.

*This is intended to provide general information. Prospective users of the schools may wish to inquire further of A/OPR/OS or contact the school directly for more specific and up-to-the-minute information. Information and statistics are current as of December 2023 and provided by the school.*

NOTE: School situations can change quickly, particularly as schools face cutbacks to learning support programs due to the pandemic, unrest, and economic uncertainty. For the most current information, work with the REO and school. Information in this document was collected by the Department of State’s Office of Overseas Schools directly from the school in December 2023 and shows the availability of services rather than an assessment of the quality of the services. The profile is intended as a jumping off point for a conversation with the REO and school to understand the best fit for your child. Definitions may vary school to school.

 

Tags

NicaraguaOffice of Overseas Schools

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 341.10 Reissue. ( a ) *Addition or change of beneficiary.* A Retirement Plan Bond will be reissued to add a beneficiary in the case of a single ownership bond, or to eliminate or substitute a beneficiary in the case of a bond registered in beneficiary form upon the owner's request on Form PD 3564. No consent will be required to support any reissue transaction from a beneficiary whose name is to be removed from the registration of a Retirement Plan Bond. If the registered owner dies after the bond has been presented and surrendered for reissue, upon receipt of notice thereof by the agency to which the request for reissue was submitted, such request shall be treated as ineffective, provided the notice of death is received by the Federal Reserve Bank or Branch or the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, Securities Transactions Branch, Washington, DC, 20226, or Bureau of the Fiscal Service, Division of Transactions and Rulings, Parkersburg, WV 26101, to which the request was sent, in sufficient time to withhold delivery, by mail or otherwise, of the reissued bond.
( b ) *Error in issue—change of name.* Reissue of a Retirement Plan Bond will be made where an error in issue has occurred, as well as in cases where the owner's name has been changed by marriage, divorce, annulment, order of court, or in any other legal manner, upon appropriate request supported by satisfactory evidence. Information as to the procedure to be followed in securing such reissue may be obtained from a Federal Reserve Bank or the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, Securities Transactions Branch, Washington, DC 20226, or Bureau of the Fiscal Service, Division of Transactions and Rulings, Parkersburg, WV 26101.
[28 FR 405, Jan. 16, 1963, as amended at 42 FR 21611, Apr. 28, 1977; 42 FR 57123, Nov. 1, 1977]
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by T.D. 9359, 72 FR 54544, Sept. 26, 2007.

§ 10.33 Best practices for tax advisors. ( a ) *Best practices.* Tax advisors should provide clients with the highest quality representation concerning Federal tax issues by adhering to best practices in providing advice and in preparing or assisting in the preparation of a submission to the Internal Revenue Service. In addition to compliance with the standards of practice provided elsewhere in this part, best practices include the following: ( 1 ) Communicating clearly with the client regarding the terms of the engagement. For example, the advisor should determine the client's expected purpose for and use of the advice and should have a clear understanding with the client regarding the form and scope of the advice or assistance to be rendered.
( 2 ) Establishing the facts, determining which facts are relevant, evaluating the reasonableness of any assumptions or representations, relating the applicable law (including potentially applicable judicial doctrines) to the relevant facts, and arriving at a conclusion supported by the law and the facts.
( 3 ) Advising the client regarding the import of the conclusions reached, including, for example, whether a taxpayer may avoid accuracy-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code if a taxpayer acts in reliance on the advice.
( 4 ) Acting fairly and with integrity in practice before the Internal Revenue Service.
( b ) *Procedures to ensure best practices for tax advisors.* Tax advisors with responsibility for overseeing a firm's practice of providing advice concerning Federal tax issues or of preparing or assisting in the preparation of submissions to the Internal Revenue Service should take reasonable steps to ensure that the firm's procedures for all members, associates, and employees are consistent with the best practices set forth in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) *Applicability date.* This section is effective after June 20, 2005.
[T.D. 9011, 67 FR 48771, July 26, 2002, as amended by T.D. 9165, 69 FR 75841, Dec. 20, 2004]
#### Mortimer Sullivan, Respondent, *against*Cornelius Farley, Appellant.

(Decided June 5th, 1882.)

A sheriff is not liable as a trespasser for levying an execution upon property exempt from levy, unless he knew that it was exempt or a claim for exemption was made to him by or on behalf of the execution debtor.

Appeal from a district court in the City of New York.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*158
      *E. P. Wilder,*for appellant.

*D. A. Spelissy,*for respondent.

Van Brunt, J.

Upon the argument of this appeal it was intimated that the case of *Twinam*v. *Swart*(4 Lans. 263), required a reversal of the judgment, unless the rule laid down in the above case was modified or controlled by the cases of *Frost*v. *Mott*(34 N. Y. 253), and *Cantrell*v. *Connor*(6 Daly 224). The reasons -requiring a claim of exemption from execution to be made by an execution debtor to the sheriff are so well stated in the case of *Twinam*v. *Swart (supra),*that it is not necessary to repeat them here, neither is it necessary to discuss the question, because such discussion would be but a mere repetition of the argument of the learned justice who wrote the opinion in tljat case. The cases of *Frost*v. *Mott*and *Cantrell*v. *Connor,*upon an examination of the same, do not conflict with the rule laid down in the case of *Twinam*v. *Swart.*

The most that can be deduced from the cases of *Frost*v. *Mott*and *Cantrell*v. *Connor*is, that where the sheriff knows that he is levying upon property which the statute exempts from execution, the execution debtor is not required to make the claim of exemption. It may' fairly be inferred that in both of these cases the Court found that the claim for exemption had been made, as in the statement of facts in the case of *Frost*v. *Mott*it is stated that the execution debtor claimed the property sued for as exempt, and in the case of *Cantrell*v. *Connor*there was positive evidence that the property sued for had been claimed by the execution debtor as exempt. It is true that there is an expression of opinion in that case that *Frost*v. *Mott*was an authority for the proposition that a failure to claim exemption would not justify or protect the sheriff in wrongfully removing and disposing of the goods by law exempt from levy and sale under legal process.

We are of opinion, therefore, that the cases of *Frost*v. *Mott*and *Cantrell*v. *Connor*are not in, conflict with the case *159of *Twinam*v. Swart, but may be reconciled with it; and that unless it is shown either that the sheriff knew that the property levied upon was .exempt from levy and sale under legal process, or a claim of exemption was made by or on behalf of the execution debtor to the sheriff, the sheriff is not a trespasser in levying upon property which upon the trial may be proved to be such, or which if the execution debtor had claimed exemption he would have had a right to have exempted from levy and sale.

Charles P. Daly, Ch. J., concurred.

Judgment reversed.