alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
** **

** **

**Certifications**

 

 

I, Richard Simpson, certifythat:

 

1.        I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D requiredto be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of CD2017-CD3 Mortgage Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.        Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.        Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this reportis included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.        Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in thisreport under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in theExchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligationsunder the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5.        All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to beincluded in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB andExchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to thisreport, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any materialinstances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed inthis report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certificationsabove, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the followingunaffiliated parties: Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, NationalAssociation; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC; Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation; Computershare Trust Company, National Association; KeyBankNational Association; Wilmington Trust, National Association; CoreLogicSolutions, LLC; AEGON USA Realty Advisors, LLC; Situs Holdings, LLC; DeutscheBank Trust Company Americas; and CWCapital Asset Management LLC.

 

 

Date:   March 29,2022

 

 

/s/ Richard Simpson

 

Richard Simpson

President, CitigroupCommercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

(senior officer in charge ofsecuritization of the depositor)
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, being the Chief Financial Officer of Texas Eastern Products
Pipeline Company, LLC, the sole general partner of TEPPCO Partners, L.P. (the
Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003, filed with
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-Q. A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to TEPPCO Partners, L.P.
and will be retained by TEPPCO Partners, L.P. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

July 30, 2003

Date

/s/ CHARLES H. LEONARDCharles H. Leonard
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Texas Eastern Products Pipeline Company, LLC, General Partner
Presidential Documents

41787 

Federal Register 

Vol. 74, No. 159 

Wednesday, August 19, 2009 

Title 3— 

The President 

Presidential Determination No. 2009–23 of July 8, 2009 

Waiver of Restriction On Providing Funds To The Palestinian 

Authority 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States of America, including section 7040(b) of the 

Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2009 (Division H, Public Law 111–8) (the ‘‘Act’’), I hereby certify 

that it is important to the national security interests of the United States 

to waive the provisions of section 7040(a) of the Act, in order to provide 

funds appropriated to carry out chapter 4 of part II of the Foreign Assistance 

Act, as amended, to the Palestinian Authority. 

You are directed to transmit this determination to the Congress, with a 

report pursuant to section 7040(d) of the Act, and to publish the determination in the Federal Register. 

[FR Doc. E9–20013 

Filed 8–18–09; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P 


CPrice-Sewell on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS6OB#1.EPS</GPH>
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 375.11 Who may participate in a redemption operation? ( a ) *Submitters.* To be a submitter, you must be an institution that the Federal Reserve Bank of New York has approved to conduct open market transactions with the Bank.
( b ) *Others.* A person or entity other than a submitter may participate only if it arranges to have an offer or offers submitted on its behalf by a submitter.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00385-CR

Willie Lee Amie, Jr.

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From Criminal District Court No. 2

of Tarrant County (1394034D)

February 25, 2016

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

 Justice Lee Gabriel
From: Szabo, Aaron <Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov> Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 11:08 AM To: Mathias, Scott; Pepple, Karl Subject: Additional Interagency Comment

Scott,
Please see below for one more small comment from the interagency review. Thanks.
We have one comment on page 81. EPA’s revised language indicated that they “attempted” to partially revoked the standard for transportation conformity purposes. We disagree with the word “attempted” as it implied the partial revocation was not a final decision. In fact, on May 21, 2012, EPA published the final Classifications Rule for the 2008 ozone NAAQS, effective July 20, 2012, which partially revoked the 1997 ozone NAAQS for conformity purposes. DOT has implemented the transportation conformity requirements based on this 2012 final.
We proposed to change the following sentences (on p.81) to read:
“The D.C. Circuit ruled that the EPA violated the CAA when it attempted to partially revoked the 1997 ozone NAAQS for transportation conformity purposes only in the Classifications Rule for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. The attempted partial revocation would have become had been in effect effective on since July 20, 2013, 1 year after the effective date of designations for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. (77 FR 30160)”
**
**Exhibit 99.7**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. §1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Amendment No.3 to the Annual Report of HEXO Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F/A forthe period ended July 31, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen Burwash, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 
(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and 

 
(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 

 
Date: December 31, 2019  By: 
/s/ Stephen Burwash
   Stephen Burwash   Chief Financial Officer   (Principal Financial Officer)**
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 249

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for coverage

under part B of the medicare program of drugs approved by the Food

and Drug Administration for the treatment of individuals with multiple

sclerosis.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. GREENWOOD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce and, in addition, to the Committee on Ways and

Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the

jurisdication of the committee concerned

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide

for coverage under part B of the medicare program

of drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration

for the treatment of individuals with multiple sclerosis.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 249 IH

1 SECTION 1. MEDICARE COVERAGE OF DRUGS FOR TREAT2 MENT OF INDIVIDUALS WITH MULTIPLE

3 SCLEROSIS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1861(s)(2) of the Social

5 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(s)(2)), as amended by sec6 tion 147(f)(6)(B) of the Social Security Act Amendments

7 of 1994, is amended—

8 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of sub9 paragraph (N);

10 (2) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of sub11 paragraph (O); and

12 (3) by inserting after subparagraph (O)

13 the following new subparagraph:

14 ‘‘(P) a drug for the treatment of individuals

15 with multiple sclerosis (if the use of the drug for

16 such purpose is approved by the Food and Drug Ad17 ministration);’’.

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

19 subsection (a) shall apply to drugs furnished on or after

20 January 1, 1996.

Æ
#### Kulick v. Kulick et al.

*Henry M. Biglctn*and *Thomas G. Gibbons,*for plaintiff.

*James L. Brown*and *Joseph V. Kasper,*for defendants.

April 7, 1953.

Valentine, P. J.,

September 25, 1951, bill filed.

February 4, 1952, answer, with new matter, filed.

September 10,1952, reply to new matter filed.

The issue is whether plaintiff is entitled to a decree directing partition of real estate.

*Findings of Fact*

1. This is a bill in equity for partition of certain real estate situate in the Borough of Dupont, bounded and described as follows: . . .

2. Title to the real estate is vested in plaintiff, Katherine Kulick, and in the following defendants: Frank J. Kulick, John F. Kulick, Stanley Kulick, Mrs. Bertha Musto, Steven Kulick, Lottie Kulick, Mrs. Victoria Kulick and Mrs. Theresa Kulick, each being the holder of a one-ninth undivided interest therein.

3. Defendant, Lottie Kulick is about 36 years of age. *604She has a low intelligence quotient and is unable to earn a livelihood.

4. Lottie Kulick lived with her mother up until the time of the latter’s death in 1943. Since that time she has lived, and is now living, with her sister, Mrs. Bertha Musto, one of the defendants. She has never been adjudged incompetent.

5. The partition of the real estate is objected to by Mrs. Musto and her husband, and also by Lottie, upon the contention that the real estate of the mother is subject to a lien for Lottie’s support and maintenance.

*Discussion*

The brief submitted by defendants’, counsel sets forth the questions involved, as follows:

> “1. Is the incompetency of defendant, Lottie Kulick, a bar to this proceeding in partition?

> *“2.*Is Lottie Kulick entitled to a children’s exemption?

> “3. Will a children’s exemption be a bar to this proceeding in partition?”

We have been referred to no authority holding that the first question should be answered in the affirmative. Had Lottie Kulick been an inmate of an institution, maintained in whole or in part by the Commonwealth, the mother would have been liable for her support: Act of June 1, 1915, P. L. 661, sec. 3. However, this liability, which , was personal, would have ceased at the mother’s death, and would not have continued against the mother’s real estate.

Almost 10 years have elapsed since the present owners, upon the death of their mother, acquired title to the real estate in question. . Apparently there has been no accounting of rents or other income from the same. To what extent, if any, the rents have been utilized for Lottie’s support does not appear. The *605rights of Lottie should be protected by the appointment of a guardian who would represent her interest.

Whether Lottie is entitled to an exemption is a matter for the orphans’ court, and not for us.

*Decree Nisi*

It is ordered, adjudged and descreed that partition be made of the real estate described in the first finding of fact.
§ 50.30 General participation requirements. ( a ) *Insurers.* As defined in § 50.4(o), all state residual market insurance entities and state workers' compensation funds are insurers under the Program even if such entities do not receive direct earned premiums.
( b ) *Mandatory participation.* State residual market insurance entities and State workers' compensation funds are mandatory participants in the Program subject to the rules issued in this Subpart.
( c ) *Identification.* Treasury maintains a list of state residual market insurance entities and state workers' compensation funds at *https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-markets-financial-institutions-and-fiscal-service/federal-insurance-office/terrorism-risk-insurance-program .* Procedures for providing comments and updates to that list are posted with the list.
[81 FR 93765, Dec. 21, 2016, as amended at 86 FR 30540, June 9, 2021]
#### In re: UNITED EDUCATION & SOFTWARE, Debtor. O. Arnold Johnson, Junior, Appellant-Appellant, v. United Education & Software, Appellee-Appellee.

No. 99-56618.

BAP No. CC-99-01291-MyBrPe.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 12, 2001.1

Decided Feb. 23, 2001.

Before LEAVY, THOMAS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

1

. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM2

O. Arnold Johnson appeals pro se the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s order dis*507missing as untimely his appeal from the Bankruptcy Court’s order that denied his administrative claim for payment. Because Johnson failed to file a timely notice of appeal in this court, we lack jurisdiction over his appeal and dismiss. *See Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corr.,*434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978); Fed. RApp. P. 4(a)(1)(A).

DISMISSED.

2

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 348.2 Redemption/call/reinvestment. ( a ) *Redemption by financial agents.* The securities may be redeemed prior to maturity by financial agents only under such terms and conditions as set forth in agreements between the financial agents and the Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Washington, DC.
( b ) *Call by the Treasury.* The securities are subject to call before maturity. The Secretary will announce such call by any means the Secretary deems appropriate.
( c ) *Reinvestment at maturity.* The securities shall be automatically redeemed at maturity and the principal amount reinvested in new securities having the same description in all material respects as the ones redeemed, except that the Secretary shall have the authority to modify the rate of interest for the re-issued securities. The securities shall be automatically redeemed and re-invested unless the agent certifies in writing, to the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Washington, DC, that it declines automatic reinvestment within seven calendar days prior to maturity date.
# L_2019246DE.01003901.xml

| 26.9.2019 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 246/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2019

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 246/39

---

Berichtigung der Delegierten Verordnung (EU) 2019/227 der Kommission vom 28. November 2018 zur Änderung der Delegierten Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1062/2014 betreffend bestimmte Kombinationen von Wirkstoff und Produktart, für welche die zuständige Behörde des Vereinigten Königreichs als bewertende zuständige Behörde benannt wurde

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 37 vom 8. Februar 2019
  )

Seite 12, Anhang zur Änderung der Tabelle in Anhang II der Delegierten Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1062/2014, Tabelle, Eintrag 1045, Spalte 2:

Anstatt:

„Zitroneneukalyptusöl, hydriert, cyclisiert“

muss es heißen:

„Zitroneneukalyptusöl, hydratisiert, cyclisiert“.

Seite 12, Anhang zur Änderung der Tabelle in Anhang II der Delegierten Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1062/2014, Tabelle, Eintrag 1046, Spalte 2:

Anstatt:

„Cymbopogon winterianus-Öl, fraktioniert, hydriert, cyclisiert“

muss es heißen:

„Cymbopogon winterianus-Öl, fraktioniert, hydratisiert, cyclisiert“.

Seite 12, Anhang zur Änderung der Tabelle in Anhang II der Delegierten Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1062/2014, Tabelle, Eintrag 1047, Spalte 2:

Anstatt:

„Zitroneneukalyptusöl und Citronellal, hydriert, cyclisiert“

muss es heißen:

„Zitroneneukalyptusöl und Citronellal, hydratisiert, cyclisiert“.

---
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 359.36 May I purchase definitive Series I savings bonds through employee thrift, savings, vacation, and similar plans?

You may purchase bonds registered in the names of employee plans in authorized denominations through a designated Federal Reserve Bank, as provided in part 360 of this chapter.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Assistant Secretary Leaf’s Travel to Egypt, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Qatar, and Oman

# 									Assistant Secretary Leaf’s Travel to Egypt, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Qatar, and Oman							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

October 10, 2022

Assistant Secretary for Near Eastern Affairs Barbara A. Leaf will travel to Egypt, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Qatar, and Oman from October 11 to October 24, to meet with a range of senior government officials, as well as non-governmental and civil society representatives.

In Egypt from October 11-14, she will discuss a range of bilateral issues, as well as our shared interests in de-escalation and maintaining regional stability.

In the United Arab Emirates from October 15-17, she will discuss our collective efforts to confront regional security challenges, including the urgent need to secure a new expanded truce agreement and broader political settlement in Yemen.

In Kuwait from October 18-19, she will raise regional developments, bilateral security cooperation, and other key issues.

In Qatar from October 19-20, she will discuss economic, security and political cooperation with the Qatari government and Qatar’s support for Afghan relocations.

In Oman from October 21-24, she will discuss Iran, Yemen, and other issues of mutual interest, and thank Oman for the important role it plays in these and other regional matters.

Tags

Bureau of Near Eastern AffairsEgyptKuwaitOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial International TravelQatarUnited Arab Emirates

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-14-0153 SAT Date: 12/31/2013

Print Date: 6/4/2014

Related cases :

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 2 3

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 1 2 1 Linear

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: Yes
Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Inhalation Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ; Keywords : Keywords: IRR/CORR-S,E,L,MM; AQUATOX
Summary of Assessment :

Fate : Fate Summary: P-14-0153-56 FATE: Estimations for typical MW 367.62 Liquid with MP < 25 C (E) log Kow = 5.45 (E) S = 0.74 mg/L at 25 C; Disp. (E;ICB) VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E) BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) log Koc = 5.40 (E) log Fish BCF = 1.89 (E)log Fish BAF = 2.94(E) POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption and biodeg Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = Linear wk; Highly branched ≥ mo Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong PBT Potential: Linear P1B2; Highly branched P2B3 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

Health : Health Summary: Absorption is poor from the skin, moderate from the GI tract, and good from the lung (analog). Concern for severe irritation and possible corrosion from the

Ecotox :
Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 0.26 amide SAR daphnid 48-h LC50 0.050 green algal 96-h EC50 0.018 fish

_ chronic value 0.004 daphnid

_ chronic value 0.006

algal

_ chronic value 0.008

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for amides SAR chemical class = amide, MW 368; log Kow 5.67 (EPI); liquid with mp unknown (P); S = 3.1 mg/L or dispersible (P); effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 1

SARs amides SAR Class amide, Ecotox Category

Ecotox Factors Comments:

SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
Exhibit
      32.1




ICONIX
      BRAND GROUP, INC.




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF




THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Iconix Brand Group, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 (the “Report”), I, Neil Cole,
      President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Neil ColeNeil
                ColePresident
                and Chief Executive OfficerDate:
                August 6, 2008
#### In the Matter of the Assignment of George Groencke to Richard L. Plahn for the Benefit of Creditors.

[Special Teem.]

(Decided December 23d, 1878.)

An assignee for the benefit of creditors and the sureties on his bond will not be discharged until after the assignee has advertised for claims, and has accounted, although a composition with all the creditors has been made and the amount thereof paid to them.

Application by an assignor and assignee under a general assignment for the benefit of creditors for the discharge of the assignee and the sureties on his bond and the re-assignment by him to the assignor of any assets of the assigned estate remaining in his hands.

The applicants showed, by affidavits, the making of the assignment, a subsequent meeting of the creditors, upon notice to all of them, the execution of a composition deed by all the creditors, and payment to them of the amount of the composition. Personal notice to all the creditors of the application was also shown.

Van Hoesen, J.

Motion for a discharge of the assignee denied. The assignee must advertise for claims. We never discharge without such an advertisement. Besides, there can be no discharge without an accounting. These *ex parte*proceedings for a composition may be right; no one can tell; but no discharge can be obtained upon them.

Application denied.