alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 16.31 Determining the amount of penalties and assessments. ( a ) In determining an appropriate amount of civil penalties and assessements, the ALJ and upon appeal, the authority head, should evaluate any circumstances that mitigate or aggravate the violation and should articulate in their opinions the reasons that support the penalties and assessments they impose. Because of the intangible costs of fraud, the expense of investigating such conduct, and the need to deter others who might be similarly tempted, double damages and a significant civil penalty ordinarily should be imposed.
( b ) Although not exhaustive, the following factors are among those that may influence the ALJ and the authority head in determining the amount of penalties and assessments to impose with respect to the misconduct (*i.e.*, the false, fictitious, or fraudulent claims or statements) charged in the complaint: ( 1 ) The number of false, fictitious, or fraudulent claims or statements;
( 2 ) The time period over which such claims or statements were made;
( 3 ) The degree of the defendant's culpability with respect to the misconduct;
( 4 ) The amount of money or the value of the property, services, or benefit falsely claimed;
( 5 ) The value of the Government's actual loss as a result of the misconduct, including foreseeable consequential damages and the costs of investigation;
( 6 ) The relationship of the amount imposed as civil penalties to the amount of the Government's loss;
( 7 ) The potential or actual impact of the misconduct upon national defense, public health or safety, or public confidence in the management of Government programs and operations;
( 8 ) Whether the defendant has engaged in a pattern of the same or similar misconduct;
( 9 ) Whether the defendant attempted to conceal the misconduct;
( 10 ) The degree to which the defendant has involved others in the misconduct or in concealing it;
( 11 ) Where the misconduct of employees or agents is imputed to the defendant, the extent to which the defendant's practices fostered or attempted to preclude such misconduct;
( 12 ) Whether the defendant cooperated in or obstructed an investigation of the misconduct;
( 13 ) Whether the defendant assisted in identifying and prosecuting other wrongdoers;
( 14 ) The complexity of the program or transaction, and the degree of the defendant's sophistication with respect to it, including the extent of the defendant's prior participation in the program or in similar transactions;
( 15 ) Whether the defendant has been found, in any criminal, civil, or administrative proceeding to have engaged in similar misconduct or to have dealt dishonestly with the Government of the United States or of a State, directly or indirectly; and
( 16 ) The need to deter the defendant and others from engaging in the same or similar misconduct.
( c ) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the ALJ or the authority head from considering any other factors that in any given case may mitigate or aggravate the offense for which penalties and assessments are imposed.
Exhibit 10.29

 

This is an English translation

 

	
Party   A:
    	
 
    	
3GUU   Mobile Entertainment Industrial Co., Ltd.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Registered   Address:
    	
 
    	
OMC   Chambers Wickhams Cay 1, Road Town, Tortola, British Virgin Islands
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Authorized   Representative:
    	
 
    	
Xian   Handi
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Party   B:
    	
 
    	
Guangzhou   Yingzheng Information Technology Co., Ltd.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Registered   Address:
    	
 
    	
Floor   15, Block A, Hua Jian Tower, No. 233, Tian Fu Road, Tianhe District,   Guangzhou
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Legal   Representative:
    	
 
    	
Wang   Yongchao
    


 

Hereinafter individually referred to as a “Party” and collectively as “Parties.”

 

Now, the Parties hereby reach a written agreement as follows:

 

1.              Party A hereby agrees and acknowledges that Party A shall be obliged to provide Party B with continuing financial support to meet the capital demands of Party B for its business operation.

 

2.              This Agreement shall take effect as of the date on which the authorized representatives of the Parties affix their signatures and seals.

 

3.              This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the PRC.

 

4.              Any dispute arising from or in connection with this Agreement shall first be settled by the Parties through friendly consultation. If the dispute cannot be settled within 30 days after one Party gives the other Party a written notice requesting for settlement through consultation, either Party may refer the dispute to China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Committee for arbitration in accordance with its then effective arbitration rules. The arbitration shall be conducted in Beijing and in Chinese language. The arbitral award shall be final and binding on both Parties.

 

5.              The Parties may amend and supplement this Agreement through reaching a written agreement. Any amendment agreement and supplementary agreement in relation to this Agreement, after being signed by the Parties, shall be an integral part of this Agreement and have the same legal effect as this Agreement.

 

(No text below)

 











 

(No text on this page. This page is the signature page to this Supplementary Agreement.)

 

 

	
Party   A:
    	
3GUU   Mobile Entertainment Industrial Co., Ltd. [Company Seal Affixed]
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Sign:
    	
/s/ Xian Handi
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Xian Handi
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Authorized   Representative
    	
 
    


 

 

	
Party B:
    	
Guangzhou Yingzheng   Information Technology Co., Ltd. [Company Seal Affixed]
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Sign:
    	
/s/ Wang Yongchao
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Wang Yongchao
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Legal   Representative
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Date of Signing:
    	
16   December 2011
    


 

2
§ 30.14 Q-14: How does section 111 of EESA operate in connection with an acquisition, merger, or reorganization? ( a ) *Special rules for acquisitions, mergers, or reorganizations.* In the event that a TARP recipient (target) is acquired by an entity that is not an affiliate of the target (acquirer) in an acquisition of any form, including a purchase of substantially all of the assets of the target, such that the acquirer after the transaction would have been treated as a TARP recipient if the target had received the TARP funds immediately after the transaction, acquirer will not become subject to section 111 of EESA merely as a result of the acquisition. If the acquirer is not subject to section 111 of EESA immediately after the transaction, then any employees of the acquirer immediately after the transaction (including target employees who were SEOs or most highly compensated employees immediately prior to the transaction and became acquirer employees as a result of the transaction) will not be subject to section 111 of EESA.
( b ) *Anti-abuse rule.* Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section, if the primary purpose of a transaction involving the acquisition, in any form, of a TARP recipient is to avoid or evade the application of any of the requirements of section 111 of EESA, the acquirer will be treated as a TARP recipient immediately upon such acquisition. In such a case, the SEOs and the most highly compensated employees to whom any of the requirements of section 111 of EESA and this Interim Final Rule apply shall be redetermined as of the date of the acquisition. The redetermined SEOs and most highly compensated employees of the post-acquisition acquirer shall consist of the PEO and PFO of the post-acquisition acquirer, plus the applicable number of next most highly compensated employees determined by aggregating the post-acquisition employees of the acquirer (to include the pre-acquisition employees of the target employed by the acquirer, or anticipated to be employed by the acquirer), and ranking such employees in order of compensation for the immediately preceding fiscal year of the pre-acquisition target or pre-acquisition acquirer, as appropriate. In the case of an asset acquisition, the entity or entities to whom the target's assets are transferred shall be treated as the direct recipient of the financial assistance for purposes of determining which other related entities are treated, in the aggregate, as the TARP recipient under the definition of “TARP recipient” in § 30.1 (Q-1).
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 351.23 Are tables of redemption values available for bonds issued prior to May 1, 1995?

You may obtain the appropriate yields and tables by downloading from our website at *www.savingsbonds.gov,* contacting us by email at *savbonds@bpd.treas.gov,* or by writing us at the following address: Bureau of the Fiscal Service, Parkersburg, West Virginia 26106-1328.
- Office Home
- About Us
- Key Topics
- Resources

HomeOffice of the Ombudsman...About Us – Office of the Ombudsman

# 									About Us – Office of the Ombudsman							

## What is the Office of the Ombudsman?

The Department of State Office of the Ombudsman handles workplace conflicts that are not currently in a formal process and helps employees identify mutually satisfactory solutions. The Department of State is a complex and far flung organization with many employees spread over 200 countries, 178 Embassies, 86 Consulates and 9 Missions. We state routinely that people are our most important asset; however there are times for nearly all of us when we need assistance or relief to solve difficulties in our work lives. When these problems defy easy categorization as potential grievances, EEO issues, or IG matters, that is precisely when you should call on the Ombudsman.

Back to Top
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

###### Editorial Note on Part 363

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 363 appear at 70 FR 57433, Sept. 30, 2005, 70 FR 57442, Sept. 30, 2005, and 75 FR 70815, Nov. 19, 2010.

#### § 363.54 What is the minimum amount of a book-entry savings bond that I must hold in my account?

Each bond held in your account must have a redemption value of at least $25. If you request a transaction that would reduce the remaining redemption value of the bond to an amount less than $25, we will not permit the transaction to occur.
#### § 501.606 Reporting and recordkeeping requirements applicable to economic sanctions programs.

The reporting and recordkeeping requirements set forth in this subpart are applicable to economic sanctions programs for which implementation and administration have been delegated to the Office of Foreign Assets Control.
|     |                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (a) | A review of the Servicer’s activities and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement during the period from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 has been made under my supervision. |

|     |                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (b) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period. |

|                                                                                                                           |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                           |
| /s/ Ryan M. Hershberger                                                                                                   |
| Ryan M. HershbergerAssistant Treasurer ofFord Motor Credit Company LLC,as Servicer of Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2017-A |
#### Julian Estrella, Plaintiff, v Manuel E. Herrera, Defendant. Alejandro Castillo et al., Respondents, v Manuel E. Herrera, Defendant, and Julian Estrella, Appellant. (And Other Actions.)

[804 NYS2d 315]

*321Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Norma Ruiz, J.), entered December 3, 2002, which, in an action for personal injuries, insofar as appealed from, granted plaintiffs’ motion for a default judgment as against defendant-appellant, and order, same court and Justice, entered March 25, 2003, which, insofar as appealable, denied defendant-appellant’s motion to renew, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant, who was given notice of plaintiffs’ motion for a default judgment *(but see*CPLR 3215 [g] [1]), opposed the motion on the ground that plaintiffs unreasonably refused to accept the answer he served some 14 months after he was served with the summons and complaint. The argument was properly rejected for failure to show a reasonable excuse for the delay *(see 114 W. 26th St. Assoc. v Fortunak,*22 AD3d 346 [2005]). We reject defendant’s alternative argument that plaintiffs waived the default by failing to return his answer, which was served after the motion for a default judgment was made. The motion for a default judgment was properly granted on the additional ground that defendant’s opposition did not contain an affidavit of merit *(see id.).*Defendant’s attempt to correct this latter defect by moving for renewal could not avail absent a concurrent showing of a reasonable excuse for the delay *(see Time Warner City Cable v Tri State Auto,*5 AD3d 153 [2004], *appeal dismissed*3 NY3d 656 [2004]). Concur—Friedman, J.P., Sullivan, Nardelli, Williams and Sweeny, JJ.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2012 - 0720 Directorate Identifier: 2012NM059AD AFMC 75FM TC - R11 - 18 --- 3/19/12 AFMC 75FM TC - R11 - 19 --- 3/19/12 AFMC 75FM TC - R11 -20 --- 3/19/12 AFMC 75FM TC - R11 -21 --- 3/19/12 AFMC 75FMA TC - R01 - 51 --- 3/19/12 AFMC 75FMA TC - R01 - 54 --- 3/19/12

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket



### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 306.19 Denominational exchanges of coupon securities.

Denominational exchanges of bearer securities are not permitted.

[64 FR 38126, July 15, 1999]
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 344.4 What are Time Deposit securities? Time Deposit securities are issued as certificates of indebtedness, notes, or bonds. ( a ) *What are the maturity periods?* The issuer must fix the maturity periods for Time Deposit securities, which are issued as follows: ( 1 ) *Certificates of indebtedness that do not bear interest.* For certificates of indebtedness that do not bear interest, the issuer can fix a maturity period of not less than fifteen days and not more than one year.
( 2 ) *Certificates of indebtedness that bear interest.* For certificates of indebtedness that bear interest, the issuer can fix a maturity period of not less than thirty days and not more than one year.
( 3 ) *Notes.* For notes, the issuer can fix a maturity period of not less than one year and one day, and not more than ten years.
( 4 ) *Bonds.* For bonds, the issuer can fix a maturity period of not less than ten years and one day, and not more than forty years.
( b ) *How do I select the SLGS rate?* For each security, the issuer shall designate an interest rate that does not exceed the maximum interest rate shown in the daily SLGS rate table as defined in § 344.1. ( 1 ) *When is the SLGS rate table released?* We release the SLGS rate table to the public by 10 a.m. Eastern time each business day or as soon as practicable thereafter. If the SLGS rate table is not available by 11 a.m. Eastern time on any given business day, the SLGS rate table for the preceding business day applies.
( 2 ) *How do I lock-in a SLGS rate?* The applicable daily SLGS rate table for a SLGSafe subscription is the one in effect on the business day that you start the subscription process. This table is shown on Fiscal Service's Application server.
( 3 ) *Where can I find the SLGS rate table?* The SLGS rate table can be obtained at Fiscal Service's Web site.
( c ) *How are interest computation and payment dates determined?* Interest on a certificate of indebtedness is computed on an annual basis and is paid at maturity with the principal. Interest on a note or bond is paid semi-annually. The issuer specifies the first interest payment date, which must be at least thirty days and less than or equal to one year from the date of issue. The final interest payment date must coincide with the maturity date of the security. Interest for other than a full interest period is computed on the basis of a 365-day or 366-day year (for certificates of indebtedness) and on the basis of the exact number of days in the half-year (for notes and bonds). See the appendix to subpart E to part 306 of this subchapter for rules regarding computation of interest.
[70 FR 37911, June 30, 2005, as amended at 89 FR 15449, Mar. 4, 2024]
**AD Economic Evaluation**



### Docket No . FAA
- 20 13
- 0119 Directorate ID : 20 11
- SW
- 034
- AD Helicopter Model: Eurocopter France Model AS350 and AS355 Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 693 Helicopters in the US Regi stry . Reason : The actions of this AD are to prevent a crack in the control lever attachment yokes, loss of tail rotor pitch control, and consequently, loss of helicopter control. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $ 37,825 to replace the tail rotor gearbox. Labor per Helicopter $ 170 to inspect the tail rotor gearbox casing assemblies. $425 to replace the tail rotor gearbox. Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $ 170 to inspect the tail rotor gearbox casing assemblies. $38,250 to replace the tail rotor gearbox. Total US Fleet Cost $ 117,810 to inspect the tail rotor gearbox casing assemblies.
Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Robert Grant
39841.

#### OCCIDENTAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA v. TEMPLETON, Executrix.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

1. The judgment of this court; *Occidental Life Ins. Co. v. Templeton,*107 Ga. App. 322 (130 *122SE2d 168), affirming the judgment of the trial court which denied the defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, having been reversed by the Supreme Court of Georgia in *Occidental Life Ins.*Co. *v. Templeton,*219 Ga. 39 (131 SE2d 530), and direction given in the remittitur to this court that “action be taken by the Court of Appeals as may be necessary to give effect to the opinion filed [by the Supreme Court] in the case,” the judgment of this court is vacated and the judgment of the trial court which denied the defendant’s motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict is reversed and direction given that such judgment be rendered in accordance with the mandate of the Supreme Court.

Decided June 27, 1963.

*Fulcher, Fulcher, Ilagler & Harper, J. Walker Harper,*for plaintiff in error.

*Jeff D. Curry, Randall Evans, Jr.,*contra.

2. In view of the direction given this court by the Supreme Court the defendant’s motion that the judgment of affirmance by this court be adhered to on other grounds must be denied.

*Judgment reversed with direction.*

*Frankum and Jordan, JJ., concur.*
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 160 (Thursday, August 20, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 42139]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20099]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement: [74 FR 41466, 
August 17, 2009].

Status: Closed Meeting.

Place: 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC.

Date and Time of Previously Announced Meeting: Thursday, August 20, 
2009 at 2 p.m.

Change in the Meeting: Cancellation of Meeting.
    The Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, August 20, 2009 at 2 
p.m. has been cancelled.
    For further information please contact the Office of the Secretary 
at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: August 18, 2009.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-20099 Filed 8-19-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 240.19 Reservation of rights.

The Secretary of the Treasury reserves the right, in the Secretary's discretion, to waive any provision(s) of this regulation not otherwise required by law.
www.gpo.gov

### §114. Payment of annuities in coin

The Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to pay in coin such of the annuities as by the terms of any treaty of the United States with any Indian tribe are required to be paid in coin.

(R.S. §2081.)

#### Codification

R.S. §2081 derived from act Mar. 3, 1865, ch. 127, §3, 13 Stat. 561.

#### Cross References

Gold coinage discontinued, see sections 5112, 5118 of Title 31, Money and Finance.