alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Assistant Secretary Witkowsky’s Travel to Sweden and France

# 									Assistant Secretary Witkowsky’s Travel to Sweden and France							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

May 19, 2023

Assistant Secretary of State for Conflict and Stabilization Operations Anne A. Witkowsky will travel to Stockholm, Sweden, and Paris, France, May 22-26 for discussions with allies and partners on a range of conflict prevention, stabilization, and strategic coordination issues.

In Stockholm, Assistant Secretary Witkowsky, USAID Assistant to the Administrator for the Bureau for Conflict Prevention and Stabilization Robert Jenkins, and Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Counternarcotics and Stabilization Policy James Saenz will participate in a meeting of the Stabilization Leaders Forum.  The Forum will explore avenues for greater collaboration, including partnership-based, long-term efforts underway through the implementation of the U.S. Strategy to Prevent Conflict and Promote Stability.

The Assistant Secretary will travel onward to Paris for high-level meetings with French government counterparts to underscore both new opportunities to collaborate through the Strategy and our deep and longstanding transatlantic commitment to European security and coordination.  She will also discuss means for further engagement with, and through, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development for the Strategy’s implementation.

Please contact CSOPublicAffairs1@state.gov for media inquiries and follow @StateCSO on Twitter for updates.

Tags

Bureau of Conflict and Stabilization OperationsEconomic AffairsFranceOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial International TravelSecuritySweden

Back to Top
# L_2020084EN.01002401.xml

| 20.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 84/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 84/24

---

Corrigendum to Commission Recommendation (EU) 2020/403 of 13 March 2020 on conformity assessment and market surveillance procedures within the context of the COVID-19 threat

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 79I of 16 March 2020
  )

In recital 21, on page 3:

for:

‘According to Article 26(4) and point 7(f) of Annex V of Regulation (EU) 2016/425’,

read:

‘According to Article 24(6) and point 4(f) of Annex V of Regulation (EU) 2016/425’.

---
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 256.50 How does Fiscal Service process back pay awards? The submitting agency may request one of two methods to process back pay awards. ( a ) One method has three parts. The first part is a payment of net back pay (and interest if authorized), which is sent to the plaintiff or to the plaintiff's attorney, as directed by the submitting agency. The second part is a payment to the agency of deductions from the net back pay. The third part is a payment of attorney fees, which is sent directly to the attorney.
( b ) Under the second method, Fiscal Service pays the entire back pay award to the agency out of whose actions the claim arose. The agency then issues amounts representing back pay (and interest if authorized) to the plaintiff and retains amounts representing deductions. Fiscal Service pays the attorney fees directly to the attorney.
[71 FR 60849, Oct. 17, 2006; 71 FR 62050, Oct. 20, 2006]
©2013 DJI Inn ovations. All Rights Reserved. 

### 1 | 

# P330CB - H3 - 2D Instruction V1.00 P330CB
- H3
- 2D Board is designed to replace the center board in side the PHANTOM. P330CB
- H3
- 2D has integrate d PMU( P ower manage unit) and GCU(Gimbal control unit) , and has add ed ports for wireless video transmission module and Z en muse H3
- 2D to enhance the compatibility with H3
- 2D. For NAZA
- M Firmware version V3.12 or above , Assistant software version V2.12 or above . 

## Introduction

In the box P330CB
- H3
- 2D Board (1), LED Board (1), 8pin cable(1), 3pin cable( 1), 3M Fixing pad (1) Spare screws: Phillips
- head screw s M2.0*6.5(5) and M1.6*4(3) 

## Self - prepared tools Allen s crew driver, Phillips
- head screw driver , soldering iron, cable ties, scissor s 

## Assembl y steps 1 、 D isassemble the 4 propellers of the PHANTOM . ( D isas sembl e 4 prop guards too if they are assembled ) 2 、 Remove screws on 4 arms to open the top cover of PHANTOM. B elow shows the positions of s crews to be removed on one arm .

Fig.1 Screws to be removed©2013 DJI Inn ovations. All Rights Reserved. 

### 2 | 3 、 Disassemble the original center board inside the P HANTOM ( 1 ) Cut off the cable ties to release the USB cable fixing to the center board. ( A1 ) ( 2 ) Disconnect the connections with the MC. (B1
- B2) ( 3 ) D e solder the ESC cables (C1
- C4) connected to the center board. ( 4 ) Remove the screws (D1
- D4) to d isassemble the original center board.

Fig.2 Disassemble items

Fig.3 Original center board is disassembled©2013 DJI Inn ovations. All Rights Reserved. 

### 3 | 4 、 Disassemble the original LED Board, assemble the new LED Board

Fig.4 Replace the LED Board 

### 5 、 Assemble P330CB - H3 - 2D ( 1 ) Remove the MC from the original center board and assemble the MC on P330CB
- H3
- 2D Board with 3M fixing pad , make sure the MC is assembled in the direction shown below. ( 2 ) Assemble the P330CB
- H3
- 2D Board with screws( D1
- D4 ). ( 3 ) Solder the ESC cables to the P330CB
- H3
- 2D Board as VCC to V and GND to G. ( 4 ) Connect the cables to the MC then tidy and check the final connections.

Fig.5 Assemble and solder©2013 DJI Inn ovations. All Rights Reserved. 

### 4 | Fig.6 Final connections 

### 6 、 Reassemble the covers and propellers, please make sure the cover points to the right nose direction and the rotating marks on propellers are in accordance with the marks on the cover.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1238 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1238

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
                 coastwise trade for each of 3 barges.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 14, 1995

   Mr. Reed introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
                 coastwise trade for each of 3 barges.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883) and 
section 12106 of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary of 
Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation with 
appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for each 
of the following barges (owned by the Harbor Marine Corporation of 
Rhode Island, incorporated under the laws of the State of Rhode Island 
and located principally in Warren, Rhode Island):
            (1) HARBOR 223 (approximately 110 feet in length).
            (2) GENE ELIZABETH (approximately 200 feet in length).
            (3) HARBOR 221 (approximately 90 feet in length).
                                 <all>
```
#### § 55.4982-1 Imposition of excise tax on undistributed income of regulated investment companies.

Section 4982 imposes an excise tax on a regulated investment company in the amount of four percent of the excess, if any, of the required distribution for a calendar year over the distributed amount for such calendar year. Section 4982 applies only to calendar years beginning after December 31, 1986.

[T.D. 8180, 53 FR 6148, Mar. 1, 1988]
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2020195EN.01011701.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 19.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 195/117 |

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/706 of 26 May 2020 amending for the 314th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida organisations

(Official Journal of the European Union
[OJ L 164, 27 May 2020](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2020_164_R_TOC)
)

On page 50, the Annex is replaced as follows:

‘ANNEX

In Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 the following entry is added under the heading “Natural persons”:

“Amir Muhammad Sa’id Abdal-Rahman al-Mawla (original script: أمیر محمد سعید عبد الرحم المولى) (good quality alias (a) Abu Ibrahim al-Hashimi al-Qurashi, (b) Hajji Abdallah, (c) Abu ‘Umar al-Turkmani, (d) Abdullah Qardash, (e) Abu ‘Abdullah Qardash, (f) al-Hajj Abdullah Qardash, (g) Hajji Abdullah Al-Afari, (h) `Abdul Amir Muhammad Sa'id Salbi, (i) Muhammad Sa'id `Abd-al-Rahman al-Mawla, (j) Amir Muhammad Sa’id ‘Abd-al-Rahman Muhammad al-Mula; low quality alias (a) Al-Ustadh, (b) Ustadh Ahmad). Date of birth: (a) 5.10.1976, (b) 1.10.1976. Place of birth: (a) Tall’Afar, Iraq, (b) Mosul, Iraq. Nationality: Iraqi. Other information: Leader of Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant, listed as Al-Qaida in Iraq. Date of designation referred to in Article 7d(2)(i): 21.5.2020.”

’

---
§ 19.845 What does the debarring official consider in deciding whether to debar me? ( a ) The debarring official may debar you for any of the causes in § 19.800. However, the official need not debar you even if a cause for debarment exists. The official may consider the seriousness of your acts or omissions and the mitigating or aggravating factors set forth at § 19.860.
( b ) The debarring official bases the decision on all information contained in the official record. The record includes— ( 1 ) All information in support of the debarring official's proposed debarment;
( 2 ) Any further information and argument presented in support of, or in opposition to, the proposed debarment; and
( 3 ) Any transcribed record of fact-finding proceedings.
( c ) The debarring official may refer disputed material facts to another official for findings of fact. The debarring official may reject any resultant findings, in whole or in part, only after specifically determining them to be arbitrary, capricious, or clearly erroneous.
Exhibit
31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Avanir Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
        Dated: February 2, 2010
    /s/ Christine G. OcampoChristine G. OcampoVice President, Finance
[Principal Financial and Accounting Officer]
#### In the Matter of the Assignment of Merwin & Co. to William S. See for the Benefit of Creditors.

[Special Term.]

(Decided September 20th, 1878.)

Upon an application for a discharge of an assignee and his sureties it must appear that creditors have been advertised for, as provided by section 4 of the Assignment Act, and that a citation to attend the accounting has been issued and served, as provided by sections 11 or 12, and that an accounting has been had, as provided by section 20.

Application for the discharge of an assignee under a general assignment for the benefit of creditors.

J. F. Daly, J.

I do not find any proof that creditors have been advertised for by the assignee under section 4 of the Act of 1877, nor that any citation has been issued under sections 13, 12, 13, &c.

The power possessed by the court or judge to grant a discharge to the assignee and his sureties, can only be exercised upon a regular proceeding for an accounting, and such proceeding must be commenced by service of a citation (§ 20, subd. 6).

If no such citation have been issued, I suggest that counsel apply under sections 11, &c. as amended by the Act of 1878, and if there be no appearance by creditors the report already made will be confirmed.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Santiago ALVARADO-GONGORA, aka Miguel Alvarado, aka Luis Ortiz-Lopez, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 99-50782.

D.C. No. CR-99-00086-AHS-2.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 12, 2001.1

Decided Feb. 22, 2001.

Before LEAVY, THOMAS and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

1

. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM2

Santiago Alvarado-Gongora appeals the sentence imposed following his conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Relying on *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), Avarado-Gongora contends that the district court erred when it increased his base offense level by 16 points, because the fact that his prior deportation followed an aggravated felony conviction was neither admitted nor proven beyond a reasonable doubt to a jury. He further contends that *Apprendi*calls into question the con*486tinuing validity of *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Alvarado-Gongora’s contentions, however, are foreclosed by our recent decision in *United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda,*234 F.3d 411, 413-14 (9th Cir.2000), *as amended*(Feb. 8, 2001).

AFFIRMED.

2

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
HomeDiplomatic Security Service Memorial...Anup Kumar  Mondal

# 				 Anup Kumar  Mondal			

				Local Law Enforcement			

Deceased				January 22, 2002			

**Kolkata Police Department image**

Tags

Diplomatic Security Service MemorialIndia

Back to Top
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1170 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1170

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 29 (legislative day, September 25), 1995

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To provide that an application for an injunction restraining the 
    enforcement, operation, or execution of a State law adopted by 
referendum may not be granted on the ground of the unconstitutionality 
of such law unless the application is heard and determined by a 3-judge 
                                 court.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 3-JUDGE COURT FOR CERTAIN INJUNCTIONS.

    Any application for an interlocutory or permanent injunction 
restraining the enforcement, operation, or execution of a State law 
adopted by referendum shall not be granted by a United States district 
court or judge thereof upon the ground of the unconstitutionality of 
such State law unless the application for the injunction is heard and 
determined by a court of 3 judges in accordance with section 2284 of 
title 28, United States Code. Any appeal of a determination on such 
application shall be to the Supreme Court. In any case to which this 
section applies, the additional judges who will serve on the 3-judge 
court shall be designated under section 2284(b)(1) of title 28, United 
States Code, as soon as practicable, and the court shall expedite the 
consideration of the application for an injunction.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    As used in this Act--
            (1) the term ``State'' means each of the several States and 
        the District of Columbia;
            (2) the term ``State law'' means the constitution of a 
        State, or any statute, ordinance, rule, regulation, or other 
        measure of a State that has the force of law, and any amendment 
        thereto; and
            (3) the term ``referendum'' means the submission to popular 
        vote of a measure passed upon or proposed by a legislative body 
        or by popular initiative.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act applies to any application for an injunction that is filed 
on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
HomeBiographies...Julieta Valls Noyes

# 				Julieta Valls Noyes			

															Assistant Secretary						Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration												

				March 31, 2022 -									Present							

Tags

Bureau of Population, Refugees, and MigrationState Department Official

Back to Top
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 254

To amend title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 with respect to establishing

an unlawful employment practice based on disparate treatment.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. HASTINGS of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Economic Educational Opportunities

A BILL

To amend title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 with

respect to establishing an unlawful employment practice

based on disparate treatment.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Disparate Treatment

5 Employment Discrimination Amendment of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

7 Section 706 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42

8 U.S.C. 2000e-5) is amended by adding at the end the fol9 lowing:
2

•HR 254 IH

1 ‘‘(l)(1) An unlawful employment practice based on

2 disparate treatment is established if—

3 ‘‘(A) the complaining party, by a preponderance

4 of the evidence, proves a prima facie case that the

5 respondent engaged in conduct that constitutes un6 lawful disparate treatment based on race, color, reli7 gion, sex, or national origin; and

8 ‘‘(B) either—

9 ‘‘(i) the respondent fails to produce any

10 evidence to rebut such case; or

11 ‘‘(ii)(I) the respondent clearly articulates,

12 and produces evidence of, one or more legiti13 mate, nondiscriminatory reasons for the con14 duct alleged to be the unlawful disparate treat15 ment; and

16 ‘‘(II) the complaining party demonstrates

17 that each of such reasons is not true, but a pre18 text for discrimination that is the unlawful dis19 parate practice.

20 ‘‘(2) Paragraph (1) shall not be construed to specify

21 the only method by which an unlawful employment prac22 tice based on disparate treatment may be established.’’.

Æ
# L_2020050EN.01002101.xml

| 24.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 50/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 50/21

---

Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/2016 of 11 March 2019 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1369 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to energy labelling of refrigerating appliances and repealing Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1060/2010

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 315 of 5 December 2019
  )

| (1) | On page 112, in Annex II, Table 1 is replaced with the following:

  ‘Table 1


  Energy efficiency classes of refrigerating appliances








  Energy efficiency class | Energy efficiency index (EEI) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| A | EEI ≤ 41 |
| B | 41 < EEI ≤ 51 |
| C | 51 < EEI ≤ 64 |
| D | 64 < EEI ≤ 80 |
| E | 80 < EEI ≤ 100 |
| F | 100 < EEI ≤ 125 |
| G | EEI > 125’ |

(1)

On page 112, in Annex II, Table 1 is replaced with the following:

‘Table 1

‘Table 1

Energy efficiency classes of refrigerating appliances

Energy efficiency classes of refrigerating appliances

Energy efficiency class

Energy efficiency class

Energy efficiency index (EEI)

Energy efficiency index (EEI)

A

EEI ≤ 41

B

41 < EEI ≤ 51

C

51 < EEI ≤ 64

D

64 < EEI ≤ 80

E

80 < EEI ≤ 100

F

100 < EEI ≤ 125

G

EEI > 125’

| (2) | On page 122, in Annex IV, under point 4(a), the formula is replaced with the following:

  ‘
  SAE = C × D × Σ n
  c = 1 Ac
  × Bc
  ×[Vc/V] × (Nc + V × rc
  × Mc)
  ’ |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On page 122, in Annex IV, under point 4(a), the formula is replaced with the following:

‘
  SAE = C × D × Σ n
  c = 1 Ac
  × Bc
  ×[Vc/V] × (Nc + V × rc
  × Mc)
  ’

SAE = C

D

Σ n

c = 1

c

Bc

[Vc

(Nc

rc

Mc

---
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 20-1120

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v.

EDWARD J. ABELL, III,

Defendant,

SHILO M. ABELL,

Claimant, Appellant.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court, issued on January 15, 2021, 

is amended as follows: 

On page 5, line 22, please replace "Victim" with 

"Victims".
The following Border Patrol Sector Points of Contact (POC) were briefed on 

September 27, 2004 concerning the availability and planned consumption of 

unspent Liberty Shield funds. All POC’s are aware funds may only be earmarked 

for state and local entities in the performance of normal duties. 

SECTOR/STATE POC PHONE NUMBER

SOUTHERN SECTORS 

Del Rio Sector – Texas – ACPA Debbie Hines (830)734-9962 

 ACPA Jim Van Gorkom (830)778-7105 

EL Paso – Texas/New Mexico – ACPA Jesse Shaw (915)834-8309 

El Centro – California ACPA Randy Stickles (760)353-3241 

Laredo – Texas ACPA John Smietana (956)764-3200 

Marfa – Texas ACPA Corrie Huffman (432)729-5200 

McAllen – Texas ACPA Cruz Rodriguez (956)984-3826 

San Diego – California ACPA Steven Kean (619)216-4005 

Tucson – Arizona ACPA Vic Manjarrez (520)670-6871 

Yuma – Arizona ACPA Kevin Jumbeck (928)341-6504 

NORTHERN SECTORS 

Blaine – Washington ACPA Erin Miller (201)332-7080 

 (360)410-7150 Cell 

 112*154*609 DC 

Buffalo – New York ACPA Mike Przybyl (716)447-3942 

Detroit – Michigan ACPA Paul McKinley (586)307-2165 

Grand Forks – N.D. WI, MN-ACPA Nick Schmitt (701)775-6250 

Havre - Montana ACPA Gill Petty (406)265-6781 

Houlton – Maine ACPA Roland Richardson (207)532-6521 

Spokane – Wash/Idaho ACPA Marvin J. Foust (509)353-2747 

 ACPA Lee Alan Pinkerton (509)353-2747 

Swanton – Vermont, NH, NY – ACPA Gary Lucui (802)868-3361 

 ACPA Leslie Lawson (802)868-3361