alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT C HUN B ING WU, Pe titione r, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 11-73787 Age n c y No. A099-672-761 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d M ay

7, 2012 ** B e fore : GOODW IN, WALLAC E, a nd GR AB ER , C irc uit Judge s. C hun B i ng W

u, a native and c itiz e n of C hina , pe titions for re vie w of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a l s’ orde r dism issing his a ppe a l from an im

m igration judge ’ s de c ision de ny ing his a pplic at ion for a s y lum , withholding of re m o va l, a nd prote c tion unde r the C onve ntion Against Torture(“ C AT” ). W e have jurisdic tion 

# FIL ED D EC 20 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re v ie w findings of fa c t for substa ntia l e vide nc e , Zhao v . Muk ase y , 540 F.3d 1027, 1030 (9th C ir. 2008), a nd we de ny

the pe tition for re vie w. W u’ s c l a im for a sy lum

re lie f fa ils be c a

u se substa

ntia l e vide nc e supports the a ge nc y ’ s de te rm i n ation tha t the ha rm W u e xpe rie nc e d did not rise to the le ve l of pa st pe rse c ution, se e Gu v . Gonzale s , 454 F.3d 1014, 1019-21 (9th C ir. 2006), a nd Wu fa ile d to de m onstra

te an obje c tive ly

re a sona ble fe ar of future pe rse c ution if re m ove d. Se e C

astro-Martine

z v . Holde r , 674 F.3d 1073, 1082 (9th C ir. 2011). B e c a use W u fa ile d to m e e t the lowe r burde n of proof for a sy lum , it follows that he ha s not m e t

the highe r sta

nda rd for withholding of rem ova l . Se e Ze haty e v . Gonzale s , 453 F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th C ir. 2006). Fina lly , substa

ntia l e v ide nc e supports the a ge nc y ’ s de nia l of C AT re lie f, be c a use W u fa ile d to e sta

blish tha t it is more like ly

tha n not tha t he will be torture d if he re turns to C hina . Se e Go v . Holde r , 640 F.3d 1047, 1053-54 (9th C i r. 2011). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D.

2
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2504 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2504

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To designate the Federal Building located at the corner of Patton 
  Avenue and Otis Street, and the United States Courthouse located on 
Otis Street, in Asheville, North Carolina, as the ``Veach-Baley Federal 
                               Complex''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2504

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To designate the Federal Building located at the corner of Patton 
  Avenue and Otis Street, and the United States Courthouse located on 
Otis Street, in Asheville, North Carolina, as the ``Veach-Baley Federal 
                               Complex''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at the corner of Patton Avenue and 
Otis Street, and the United States Courthouse located on Otis Street, 
in Asheville, North Carolina, shall be known and designated as the 
``Veach-Baley Federal Complex''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the buildings referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Veach-Baley Federal 
Complex''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 18 
      (legislative day, December 15), 1995.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
40439.

#### NEWARK INSURANCE COMPANY v. SMITH.

*840Decided January 15, 1964.

*841
      *M. L. Preston, George E. Maddox,*for plaintiff in error.

*Arthur C. Farrar,*contra.

Jordan, Judge.

The liability of the defendant insurance company under the pro rata clause of the policy sued upon was limited to the proportion of the loss which the amount insured by it bore to the whole amount of insurance on the property. This fact would not, however, preclude recovery against the defendant insurance company in the full amount of coverage afforded by the policy in question since the evidence adduced on the trial of this case in behalf of the plaintiff insured authorized the finding that the loss sustained by him was greater than the total amount of combined coverage under the policies of both the defendant insurer and the Utica Fire Insurance Company.

Under these circumstances, where the amount of the loss exceeded the amount recoverable under the combined policies, the fact that other insurance existed would not preclude recovery of the full amount of the policy sued upon, Niagara Falls Ins. Co. v. Johnson, 231 Ky. 426 (21 SW2d 794); and the release of the Utica Fire Insurance Company by the plaintiff upon settlement of his claim under the policy issued by that company would not relieve the defendant company from payment of its proportionate share of the loss under the pro rata clause of its policy which in this case constituted the total amount of coverage of said policy. 46 CJS 150, Insurance, § 1206; Rallis v. Conn. Fire Ins. Co., 46 NM 77 (120 P2d 736).

It is only where the loss sustained by the insured has been *842completely satisfied under policies of insurance with other companies that the question of the discharge of the non-participating insurer’s obligation to the insured may arise, as in *Williamsburg City Fire Ins. Co. v. Gwinn,*88 Ga. 65 (13 SE 837) and *Norwich Union Fire Ins. Society v. Wellhouse,*113 Ga. 970 (1) (39 SE 397); and not, such as here, where the finding was authorized that the loss sustained by the plaintiff insured exceeded the combined coverage of all policies of insurance and had not been completely satisfied by any prior settlement with another company. The trial court did not err therefore in denying the defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and the general grounds of its motion for new trial.

While the Act of 1960 (Ga. L. 1960, pp. 289, 502) originally provided that the amount of attorney’s fees recoverable because of the bad faith of the insurer “shall be determined by the trial court,” said provision was changed by an amendment to the Act, approved March 7, 1962 (Ga. L. 1962, p. 712; *Code Ann.*§ 56-1206) which provided that said attorney’s fees “shall be determined by the trial jury.” Accordingly, the sole special ground of the amended motion for new trial which was predicated upon the contention that the question of attorney’s fees was for the court and not the jury under the provision of the Act of 1960, supra, is without merit.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Frankum, J., concur.*
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 346.5 Limitation on holdings. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the amount of Individual Retirement Bonds which may be registered in any one individual's name is limited to the amount for which an annual deduction may be taken under either section 219 or 220 of the Internal Revenue Code.[1] These limitations are as follows: ( 1 ) In the case of an individual electing to deduct his or her bond purchase under section 219, the face amount of bonds purchased for tax deduction in any given year may not exceed 15 percent of the individual's earned income for that year or $1,500, whichever is less.
( 2 ) In the case of an individual electing to deduct his or her bond purchases under section 220, the total face amount of bonds purchased for tax deduction in any given year in the name of the individual and in the name of his or her nonworking spouse, may not exceed 15 percent of the working spouse's earned income for that year or $1,750, whichever is less.[2]
( b ) The above limitations do not apply to rollover bond purchases, as described in sections 402(a)(5), 403(a)(4), or 408(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.
(26 U.S.C. 220 and 31 U.S.C. 757)
[42 FR 37520, July 21, 1977] Footnotes -
346.5
[1] Note: Under the Internal Revenue Code, bonds issued during any given year or within 45 days thereafter may be deducted in that year.
[2] Note: Code section 220 requires, in effect, that the total IRA contributions in each spouse's name to be deducted in any one year be in equal amounts. While it is permissible for an eligible married couple to utilize several different forms of IRA investments within the same year, this means that couples investing solely in bonds must purchase equal amounts of bonds in each spouse's name.
HomeBiographies...Alicia A.  Frechette

# 				Alicia A.  Frechette			

															Executive Director						Bureau of Legislative Affairs												

				January 10, 2016 -									Present							

Alicia Frechette is the Department’s Executive Director of the Office of the Legal Adviser and Bureau of Congressional Affairs (L-H/EX).  She brings over thirteen years of executive-level experience to the joint executive office which is responsible for successfully devising and implementing the full range of management and administrative support and advice to the L and H bureaus of approximately 470 employees and contractors who provide legal advice and counsel and legislative strategy on behalf of the entire Department of State.

Ms. Frechette joined the Department of State in 1989.  In 2001, Ms. Frechette became the Deputy Executive Director of L and became the Executive Director in 2008.  Ms. Frechette also serves on a number of Departmental boards and advisory groups and is a committed champion of professional development and DEIA initiatives inside her bureaus and across the Department.

Among her previous roles, she provided expertise to the Bureau of Administration (A) as a Personnel Management Specialist, then as the SES Program Manager in the Bureau of Human Resources (HR), where she supported the Executive Resources Board, SES recruitment, Civil Service performance management and Schedule C appointments, followed by Chief of Human Resources for A, where she oversaw the provision of delegated HR services including recruitment, classification, staffing, performance management and recognition, position management, employee relations, in addition to training and development.

Ms. Frechette has a B.A. in English from the University of Maryland.  She and her husband Steve Ericson have four children.  She and her family are active volunteers in her community and her professional and personal focus has been in helping to develop women leaders and promoting opportunities for greater inclusion for those with special needs.

Tags

Bureau of Legislative AffairsState Department Official

Back to Top
GOVERNMENTOFTHEDISTRICTOFCOLUMBIADistrictDepartmentoftheEnvironment***OfficeoftheDirector__________JAN22010Mr.ShawnM.Garvin26RegionalAdministratorU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency,Region3MailCode3RAOO1650ArchStreetPhiladelphia,PASubject:SubmittalofaSIPRevisiontoIncorporatetheDistrict’sRevisedTransportationConformityRegulationsDearMr.Garvin:TheDistrictofColumbiaiscurrentlyinnonattainmentofthenationalambientairqualitystandards(NAAQS)foreight-hourozone.Inaccordancewith§110and171to193(PartD)oftheCleanAirAct,42U.S.C.§7410and7501etseq.,asamended,theDistrictmustdevelopanairqualitystateimplementationplan(SIP)thatincludesstandardsandprocedurestofollowwhenevaluatingwhetherFederally-fundedtransportationprojectsconformtoemissionlimitsestablishedtoattaintheNAAQS.SinceconformitycommitmentsintheSIPmustbeenforceable,theDistrict’sresponsibilitiesmustbecodifiedintheDistrictofColumbiaMunicipalRegulations(DCMR).TheDistrict’sgeneralconformityrequirementsinChapter4of20DCMRwereamended,andrevisionswereplacedinanewChapter15.AresolutiontoapprovetherevisedtransportationconformityregulationswaspassedbytheCounciloftheDistrictofColumbiaonNovember28,2009.ThenewregulationswereconsideredfinaluponpublicationofaNoticeofFinalRulemakingintheDCRegisteronJanuary8,2010.IhereinrequestthattheUnitedStatesEnvironmentalProtectionAgency(EPA)approvethenewtransportationconformityregulationsat20DCMRChapter15asaSIPrevision.Also,pleasefindattached(1)thenoticeoffinalrulemaking,(2)thepublichearingnoticeandaffidavitofpublication,and(3)thehearingofficer’scertification.Shouldyouhaveanyquestionsorrequireadditionalinformation,pleasecontactCecilyBeallat(202)535-2626.Sincerely,MaurnMcGon\InterimDirectorCc:DavidL.Arnold,ActingDirector,AirProtectionDivision,U.S.EPARegion3CecilyBeall,AssociateDirector,AirQualityDivision,DDOEDDDISTRICTDEPARTMENT51NSkeet,NE,5thFl.,Washington,DC20002Phone:(202)535-2250Facsimile:(202)481-3771OFTIlEENVIRONMENT
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Biden Administration Announces Additional U.S. Military Assistance for Ukraine

# 									Biden Administration Announces Additional U.S. Military Assistance for Ukraine							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

December 27, 2023

The United States is announcing the year’s final package of weapons and equipment for Ukraine.  Our assistance has been critical to supporting our Ukrainian partners as they defend their country and their freedom against Russia’s aggression.

This package provides up to $250 million of arms and equipment under previously directed drawdowns for Ukraine.  Capabilities provided in today’s package include air defense munitions, other air defense system components, additional ammunition for high mobility artillery rocket systems, 155mm and 105mm artillery ammunition, anti-armor munitions, and over 15 million rounds of ammunition.

A coalition of more than 50 countries continues to provide critical support for Ukraine’s forces.  It is imperative that Congress act swiftly, as soon as possible, to advance our national security interests by helping Ukraine defend itself and secure its future.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of Political-Military AffairsDefenseOffice of the SpokespersonPolitical-Military CooperationRussiaSecretary TripThe Secretary of StateSecurityUkraine

Back to Top
### Streamflow characteristics at hydrologic bench-mark stations

By: C.L. Lawrence

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir941

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
- Artemis Accords
- Remarks and Releases

HomeArtemis Accords...Artemis Accords – Remarks and Releases

# 						Artemis Accords – Remarks and Releases					

39 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year202420232022

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a SpeakerAntony J. BlinkenJennifer R. Littlejohn

Select a LocationAngolaArgentinaBahrainBelgiumBulgariaCzech RepublicEcuadorFranceGermanyGreeceIndiaJapanLithuaniaNetherlandsNigeriaPeruPhilippinesRomaniaRwandaSaudi ArabiaSingaporeSlovakiaSloveniaSouth KoreaSpainSwedenSwitzerlandUruguay

Select a Release TypeDipNoteDipNote: Climate and EnvironmentDipNote: Science, Technology, and InnovationFact SheetMedia NotePress StatementRemarks

Select a Bureau/OfficeBureau of African AffairsBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of Near Eastern AffairsBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsOffice of Diversity and InclusionOffice of Science and Technology CooperationOffice of Space AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

          -    Media Note  		United States Welcomes Slovakia’s Signing of the Artemis Accords	  May 30, 2024 
          -    Media Note  		United States Welcomes Peru’s Signing of the Artemis Accords    	  May 30, 2024 
          -    Media Note  		United States Welcomes Lithuania’s Signing of the Artemis Accords	  May 15, 2024 
          -    Media Note  		Joint Statement on U.S.-Philippines Space Dialogue	  May 13, 2024 
          -    Media Note  		United States Welcomes Slovenia’s Signing of the Artemis Accords	  April 22, 2024 
          -    Media Note  		United States Welcomes Switzerland and Sweden’s Signing of the Artemis Accords	  April 17, 2024 
          -    Media Note  		United States Welcomes Uruguay’s Signing of the Artemis Accords   	  February 15, 2024 
          -    Remarks  		Secretary Antony J. Blinken at the Artemis Accords Signing Ceremony With Greek Foreign Minister Georgios Gerapetritis, NASA Administrator Bill Nelson, and Dr. Daglis	  Antony J. BlinkenFebruary 9, 2024Washington, D.C. 
          -    Media Note  		United States Welcomes Greece’s Signing of the Artemis Accords	  February 9, 2024 
          -    Media Note  		United States Welcomes the Kingdom of Belgium’s Signing of the Artemis Accords	  January 24, 2024 

1234next page

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 343.1 General provisions. ( a ) *Regulations.* Tax and loss bonds are subject to the general regulations with respect to United States securities, which are set forth in the Department of the Treasury Circular No. 300 (31 CFR part 306), to the extent applicable. Copies of the circular may be obtained from the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, Division of Special Investments, Room 309, 200 Third St., P.O. Box 396, Parkersburg, WV 26106-0396 or downloaded from Fiscal Service's home page on the Internet at: *http://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/ .*
( b ) *Issuance.* Tax and loss bonds are issued in book-entry form on the books of the Treasury that are maintained by the Division of Special Investments. The bonds are issued with 10 or 20 year maturities as designated by the purchaser. These bonds are non-interest bearing. Any transfer by sale, exchange, assignment, pledge or otherwise, is prohibited. The bonds may be reissued as provided in § 343.4.
( c ) *Fiscal agents.* Selected Federal Reserve Banks and Branches, as fiscal agents of the United States, may be designated to perform such services requested of them by the Secretary of the Treasury in connection with the purchase, redemption and other transactions involving these bonds.
( d ) *Debt limit contingency.* The Department of the Treasury reserves the right to change or suspend the terms and conditions of this offering, including provisions relating to the purchase of, and redemption of, the bonds as well as notices relating hereto, at any time the Secretary determines that the issuance of obligations sufficient to conduct the orderly financing operations of the United States cannot be made without exceeding the statutory debt limit. Announcement of such changes shall be provided by such means as the Secretary deems appropriate.
( e ) *General redemption provisions.* A bond may not be called for redemption by the Secretary of the Treasury prior to maturity. When the bond matures, payment will be made of the principal amount due to the owner. A bond scheduled for maturity on a non-business day will be redeemed on the next business day.
( f ) *Reservations.* The Secretary of the Treasury may at any time, or from time to time, supplement or amend the terms of this circular or any related amendments or supplements. Transaction requests, including purchases or redemptions of bonds, are not acceptable if unsigned, inappropriately completed, or not timely submitted. Any of these actions shall be final. The authority of the Secretary to waive regulations under 31 CFR 306.126 applies to part 343.
( g ) *Forms and additional information.* The application form for subscriptions, Fedwire instructions and other information will be furnished by the Division of Special Investments upon request by writing to the Division of Special Investments or by calling (304) 480-7752. Application forms may also be downloaded from the Internet at Fiscal Service's home page at: *http://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/ .*
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 359.35 May I purchase definitive Series I savings bonds through a payroll savings plan? Treasury discontinued the issuance of definitive Series I savings bonds through a payroll savings plan: ( a ) Effective October 1, 2010, for United States government employees, and
( b ) Effective January 1, 2011, for all other employees.
[75 FR 52461, Aug. 26, 2010]