alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### International strategic minerals inventory summary report; lithium

By: T.F. AnstettU.H. KraussJ.A. OberH.W. Schmidt

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir930I

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1373

To designate the Federal Aviation Administration Technical Center located

at the Atlantic City International Airport in Pomona, New Jersey, as

the ‘‘William J. Hughes Technical Center’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 30, 1995

Mr. TRAFICANT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To designate the Federal Aviation Administration Technical

Center located at the Atlantic City International Airport

in Pomona, New Jersey, as the ‘‘William J. Hughes

Technical Center’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Federal Aviation Administration Technical Cen5 ter located at the Atlantic City International Airport in

6 Pomona, New Jersey, shall be known and designated as

7 the ‘‘William J. Hughes Technical Center’’.
2

•HR 1373 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

4 Aviation Administration Technical Center referred to in

5 section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘William

6 J. Hughes Technical Center’’.

Æ
§ 28.435 Employment assistance to students. ( a ) *Assistance by recipient in making available outside employment.* A recipient that assists any agency, organization, or person in making employment available to any of its students: ( 1 ) Shall assure itself that such employment is made available without discrimination on the basis of sex; and
( 2 ) Shall not render such services to any agency, organization, or person that discriminates on the basis of sex in its employment practices.
( b ) *Employment of students by recipients.* A recipient that employs any of its students shall not do so in a manner that violates §§ 28.500 through 28.550.
| (logo) NTS NATIONAL

TAX SEARCH, LLC | 130 S. Jefferson, Suite 300

Chicago, IL 60661

312-233-6440 |
|--------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OFCOMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION’S REGULATION ABSERVICING CRITERIA

 

 

For the calendar year endingDecember 31, 2016, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for **WellsFargo Bank** (the “Servicer”).

 

National Tax Search, LLC(“NTS”) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2016 and forthe period from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the “ReportingPeriod”) with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d)of the Code of Federal Regulations (the “CFR”). NTS has used the servicingcriteria communicated to NTS by the Servicer to assess compliance with theapplicable servicing criteria. Only servicing criteria 1122 (d) (l)(ii), 1122(d)1(iv), 1122 (d)2(ii), 1122 (d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and1122(d)(4)(xii) (the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”) are applicable to theactivities NTS performs with respect to the transactions covered by thisreport. NTS has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth inItem 1122 (d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities itperforms with respect to the transactions covered by this report. Thetransactions covered by this report include all tax payments made on behalf ofthe Servicer using NTS’s TaxQ system (the “Platform Transactions”).

 

NTS, as a vendor, has assessedits compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Periodand has concluded that NTS has complied, in all material respects, with theApplicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2016 and for the ReportingPeriod with respect to the Platform Transactions taken as a whole.

 

Plante& Moran, PLLC, anindependent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation reporton the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as ofDecember 31, 2016 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

 

National Tax Search, LLC, asVendor to Servicer

 

 

/s/ Lori D. Eshoo

Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO 

January 23, 2017
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AVANIR Pharmaceuticals (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Gerald J. Yakatan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ GERALD J. YAKATAN, PH.D.
----------------------------
    Gerald J. Yakatan, Ph.D.
    Chief Executive Officer
    February 13, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to AVANIR Pharmaceuticals and will
be retained by AVANIR Pharmaceuticals and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission upon request.
#### § 34.707 Recordkeeping—Centers of Excellence Research Grants Program.

Recipients must maintain records as prescribed by Treasury and make the records available to Treasury, including the Treasury Inspector General.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 315.45 General. Reissue of a bond may be made only under the conditions specified in these regulations, and only at: ( a ) A Federal Reserve Bank or Branch, or
( b ) The Bureau of the Fiscal Service.
Reissue will not be made if the request is received less than one full calendar month before the final maturity date of a bond. The request, however, will be effective to establish ownership as though the reissue had been made.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2489

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for coverage

under the Medicare Program of certain additional oral anticancer drugs.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 17, 1995

Mrs. VUCANOVICH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on

Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker,

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide

for coverage under the Medicare Program of certain additional oral anticancer drugs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MEDICARE COVERAGE OF CERTAIN ADDI4 TIONAL ORAL ANTICANCER DRUGS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1861 of the Social Secu6 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x) is amended—

7 (1) in subsection (s)(2)(Q)—

8 (A) by inserting ‘‘(i)’’ after ‘‘(Q)’’, and
2

•HR 2489 IH

1 (B) by adding at the end the following:

2 ‘‘and

3 ‘‘(ii) an oral drug (which is approved by the

4 Federal Food and Drug Administration) prescribed

5 for use as an anticancer nonsteroidal antiestrogen

6 and aromastase inhibitor agent for a given indica7 tion;’’; and

8 (2) in subsection (t), by inserting ‘‘or used in

9 an anticancer nonsteroidal antiestrogen and

10 aromatase inhibitor regimen’’ after ‘‘regimen’’.

11 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section

12 1834(j)(5)(F)(iv) of such Act (42 U.S.C.

13 1395m(j)(5)(F)(iv)) is amended by striking ‘‘therapeutic’’.

14 EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this

15 section shall apply to drugs furnished on or after the first

16 day of the first month that begins more than 60 days after

17 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ricky Martin, Appellant.

[803 NYS2d 920]

Application by the *498appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated February 25, 1985 *(People v Martin,*108 AD 2d 928 [1985]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered September 8, 1982.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz, 2*NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., Florio, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

TARA DENNINGTON, 

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN 

SERVICES, 

Respondent-Appellee

______________________

2024-1214

______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims 

in No. 1:18-vv-01303-ZNS, Judge Zachary N. Somers. 

______________________

O R D E R

The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that:

(1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App. 

P. 42 (b).

Case: 24-1214 Document: 11 Page: 1 Filed: 03/25/2024
2 DENNINGTON V. HHS

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

March 25, 2024

Date

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: March 25, 2024

Case: 24-1214 Document: 11 Page: 2 Filed: 03/25/2024
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 11.1
                                                                   ------------

      SLADE'S FERRY BANCORP. AND SUBSIDIARY
            QUARTERLY DATA (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         Six Months Ended June 30,               Three Months Ended June 30,
                                                          2006               2005                   2006               2005
                                                   ------------------------------------      --------------------------------------
                                                   (In thousands, except per share date)     (In thousands, except per share (date)
<S>                                                    <C>                 <C>                    <C>               <C>
Net income                                             $    1,533          $    1,948             $      626        $      848
                                                       ==========          ==========             ==========        ==========

Average common shares outstanding
                                                        4,151,091           4,094,939              4,156,481         4,112,696
                                                       ==========          ==========             ==========        ==========

Basic earnings per share                               $     0.37          $     0.48             $     0.15        $     0.21
                                                       ==========          ==========             ==========        ==========

Average common shares outstanding
                                                        4,151,091           4,094,939              4,156,481         4,112,696
Net effect of dilutive stock options
                                                           17,180              28,857                 14,129            20,016
                                                       ==========          ==========             ==========        ==========
Adjusted common shares outstanding
                                                        4,168,271           4,123,796              4,170,610         4,132,712
                                                       ==========          ==========             ==========        ==========

Diluted earnings per share                             $     0.37          $     0.47             $     0.15        $     0.21
                                                       ==========          ==========             ==========        ==========

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7181
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus GENE ELLIS WILLIAMS, a/k/a Glenn, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-86-40-P, CA-95-116-3-P) Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 11, 1996 Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Gene Ellis Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas J. Ashcraft, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Williams , Nos. CR-86-40-P; CA-95-116-3-P (W.D.N.C. June 21, 1995).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Vistra Energy Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K (as amended) forthe period ended December 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David A. Campbell, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as ofthe date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge: 

 
(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

 
(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. 

 
Date: July 19, 2019   
/s/ David A. Campbell
   David A. Campbell   Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   (Principal Financial Officer)
*The foregoing certification is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Vistra Energy Corp. under Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general incorporation language of such filing.*
**
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
QUARTERLY REPORT 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000858210                        
<NAME>                        MARRIOTT DIVERSIFIED AMERICAN HOTELS LP   
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-11-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1000
<CASH>                                         13,581
<SECURITIES>                                   2,442  <F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4,097
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               20,120
<PP&E>                                         156,236
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (50,669)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 125,687
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          990
<BONDS>                                        134,195
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (9,498) <F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   125,687
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               20,351
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  7,340
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             6,030
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                6,981
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            6,981
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   6,981
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>  THIS REPRESENTS OTHER ASSETS.
<F2>  THIS REPRESENTS PARTNERS DEFICIT.
</FN>
        



</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 206.7 Compliance. ( a ) The Service will monitor agency cash management performance. Part of the monitoring process will include establishing implementation end dates for conversion to, or expansion of, EFT mechanisms, as well as the identification of mitigating circumstances that may prevent the use of EFT.
( b ) In cases where an agency fails to meet a scheduled date within its control, or where an agency converts to a less cost-effective transfer mechanism without prior, written Service approval as determined in accordance with § 206.4(c), the Service will send a formal Notice of Deficiency to an agency's designated cash management official. A separate Notice will be sent for each initiative. ( 1 ) *Collections cash flows.* For collections cash flows, the Notice of Deficiency will include the nature of the deficiency, the amount of the proposed charge, the method of calculation, the right to file an appeal, and the date the charge will be imposed in the absence of an appeal. The amount of the charge will be equal to the cost of such noncompliance to the Treasury's General Fund.
( 2 ) *Payments cash flows.* [Reserved]
#### Steven EDWARDS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michael YORK, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 02-6241.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 30, 2002.

Decided June 6, 2002.

Steven Edwards, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, Office of The Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

*74Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Steven Edwards seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). Appellant’s case was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1994). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Appellant that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Appellant failed to object to the magistrate judge’s recommendation.

The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. *See Wright v. Collins,*766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir.1985); *see also Thomas v. Arn,*474 U.S. 140, 106 S.Ct. 466, 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985). Appellant has waived appellate review' by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. We accordingly deny Appellant’s motion to proceed in for-ma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 256.40 When must an agency reimburse the Judgment Fund?

Agencies are required to reimburse the Judgment Fund for payments made pursuant to the Contract Disputes Act (CDA), 41 U.S.C. 612, and payments made pursuant to the Notification and Federal Employees Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 (No FEAR), 5 U.S.C. 2301 note. The TFM, available on the Judgment Fund Web site at *http://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/judgefund*, contains more information about how Fiscal Service bills agencies and collects such reimbursements.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 347.34 Payment (redemption). The issuance and redemption of a retirement savings bond is conditioned on an Auto-IRA custodian certifying compliance with these regulations and with any additional program instructions identified by Fiscal Service that pertain to that bond. ( a ) *Payment upon maturity.* Payment of retirement savings bonds will be made to an Auto-IRA custodian upon the custodian's submission of a request for redemption to Fiscal Service. The custodian shall request the redemption of all retirement savings bonds at their respective maturity. The custodian shall request the full or partial redemption of a bond held on behalf of a participant upon the request of the participant or other authorized person entitled to amounts in the IRA. Retirement savings bond redemptions will be rounded to the nearest one cent.
( b ) *Payment upon call.* Final interest on any called bonds will be paid with the principal (amount contributed minus withdrawals taken) at redemption and rounded to the nearest one cent.