alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1346

To amend the guarantee fee provisions of the Federal Ship Mortgage

Insurance program in the Merchant Marine Act, 1936.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 29, 1995

Mr. SPENCE (for himself, Mr. DELLUMS, Mr. BATEMAN, and Mr. TAYLOR of

Mississippi) (all by request) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on National Security

A BILL

To amend the guarantee fee provisions of the Federal Ship

Mortgage Insurance program in the Merchant Marine

Act, 1936.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. COMPUTATION OF FEE FOR LOAN GUARAN4 TEES UNDER TITLE XI OF MERCHANT MA5 RINE ACT, 1936.

6 Section 1104A(e) of title XI of the Merchant Marine

7 Act, 1936 (46 App. U.S.C. 1274(e)) is amended to read

8 as follows:
2

•HR 1346 IH

1 ‘‘(e) GUARANTEE FEES.—The Secretary is author2 ized to fix a fee for the guarantee of an obligation under

3 this title. All guarantee fees shall be computed and shall

4 be payable to the Secretary under such regulations as the

5 Secretary may prescribe: Provided, That the rate governing such a fee shall not be less than 3 6 ⁄4 of 1 percent per

annum nor more than 11 7 ⁄2 percent per annum; and: Pro8 vided, further, That when moneys are first advanced under

9 a guaranteed obligation, the project’s entire fee payment

10 shall be made by the obligor to the Secretary in an amount

11 equal to the sum of the present value of the separate prod12 ucts obtained by applying the guarantee fee rate to the

13 projected amount of the guaranteed obligations outstand14 ing, excluding the average amount (except interest) on de15 posit in the escrow fund created under section 1108 of

16 this Act, for each year of the stated maturity of the guar17 antee obligation. Such regulations shall provide that the

18 discount rate for calculating the present value of each

19 product shall be a rate determined by the Secretary of the

20 Treasury, taking into consideration current market yields

21 on outstanding obligations of the United States of com22 parable maturity. Such regulations shall also provide a

23 formula for determining the creditworthiness of obligors

24 under which the most creditworthy obligors pay a fee com25 puted on the lowest allowable percentage and the least
3

•HR 1346 IH

1 creditworthy obligors pay a fee which may be computed

2 on the highest allowable percentage. Under no cir3 cumstances may the Secretary refund the guarantee fee

4 to the obligor. A guarantee fee paid pursuant to this sec5 tion may be included in actual cost and is eligible to be

6 financed under this title.’’.

Æ
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES



<Table>
<Caption>
                                                             YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,                     6 MONTHS
                                            --------------------------------------------------------        ENDED
                                                1996       1997        1998       1999       2000       JUNE 30, 2001
                                            --------    --------    --------    --------    --------    -------------
                                                                 (in thousands)
<S>                                         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>
EARNINGS
       Income From Continuing Operations*     59,246      61,925      53,885      72,856      65,951           59,851
       Fixed Charges                          36,485      35,458      30,915      34,305      55,621           33,375
       Distributed Income of
          Equity Investment                       --          --          --          --          --           17,600
       Capitalized Interest                   (1,388)     (1,478)       (795)     (2,133)     (4,559)            (935)
                                            --------    --------    --------    --------    --------    -------------
          Total Earnings                      94,343      95,905      84,005     105,028     117,013          109,891
                                            ========    ========    ========    ========    ========    =============

FIXED CHARGES
       Interest Expense                       34,922      33,707      29,784      31,563      48,982           31,686
       Capitalized Interest                    1,388       1,478         795       2,133       4,559              935
       Rental Interest Factor                    175         273         336         609       2,080              754
                                            --------    --------    --------    --------    --------    -------------
          Total Fixed Charges                 36,485      35,458      30,915      34,305      55,621           33,375
                                            ========    ========    ========    ========    ========    =============


RATIO:  EARNINGS / FIXED CHARGES                2.59        2.70        2.72        3.06        2.10             3.29
                                            ========    ========    ========    ========    ========    =============
</Table>

       * Excludes minority interest, extraordinary loss and undistributed equity
earnings.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 347.31 Crediting of retirement savings bond.

Each retirement savings bond issued to an Auto-IRA custodian must be credited to an IRA under the state Auto-IRA program with the custodian.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 132 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 132

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a refundable 
        income tax credit for the recycling of hazardous wastes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

 Mr. Solomon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a refundable 
        income tax credit for the recycling of hazardous wastes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Hazardous Waste Recycling Tax Credit 
Act of 1995''.

SEC. 2. CREDIT FOR RECYCLING HAZARDOUS WASTES.

    (a) In General.--Subpart C of part IV of subchapter A of chapter 1 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to refundable credits) 
is amended by redesignating section 35 as section 36 and by inserting 
after section 34 the following new section:

``SEC. 35. CREDIT FOR RECYCLING HAZARDOUS WASTES.

    ``(a) In General.--There shall be allowed as a credit against the 
tax imposed by this subtitle for the taxable year an amount equal to 2 
cents for each pound of qualified hazardous waste recycled by the 
taxpayer during the taxable year.
    ``(b) Qualified Hazardous Waste.--For purposes of this section, the 
term `qualified hazardous waste' means any substance--
            ``(1) which is listed by the Environmental Protection 
        Agency under section 3001 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, or 
        the characteristics of which are identified under such section 
        3001, and
            ``(2) which is a waste product generated by the taxpayer in 
        a trade or business conducted by the taxpayer.''
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for such subpart C 
is amended by striking the item relating to section 35 and inserting 
the following new items:

                              ``Sec. 35. Credit for recycling hazardous 
                                        wastes.
                              ``Sec. 36. Overpayment of taxes.''
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to substances recycled after the date of the enactment of this 
Act in taxable years ending after such date.
                                 <all>
```
### Geophysics and petrology of the deep crust and upper mantle; a workshop

By: S. H. KirbyJ. E. Nielson-Pike

Edited by: Jay S. Noller

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir956

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
www.gpo.gov

### §760. Education and training program; purposes; subjects; transportation; subsistence; contracts; other education programs

Prior to the issuance of a proclamation in accordance with the provisions of section 757 of this title, the Secretary is authorized to undertake, within the limits of available appropriations, a special program of education and training designed to help the members of the tribe to earn a livelihood, to conduct their own affairs, and to assume their responsibilities as citizens without special services because of their status as Indians. Such program may include language training, orientation in non-Indian community customs and living standards, vocational training and related subjects, transportation to the place of training or instruction, and subsistence during the course of training or instruction. For the purposes of such program the Secretary is authorized to enter into contracts or agreements with any Federal, State, or local governmental agency, corporation, association, or person. Nothing in this section shall preclude any Federal agency from undertaking any other program for the education and training of Indians with funds appropriated to it.

(Sept. 1, 1954, ch. 1207, §23, 68 Stat. 1104.)
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

** **

** **

Reference is herebymade to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 1,2017, by and among BARCLAYS COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES LLC, as Depositor,WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITALADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asCertificate Administrator, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trusteeand PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and as AssetRepresentations Reviewer with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates, Series 2017-C1 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized termsused herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in theAgreement.

 

Pursuant to Section11.09 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.      Areview of the activities of the Servicer during the period from January 1, 2018through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance perthe Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2.      To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all ofits obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

Leslie Hayton

Managing Director

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
#### § 1023.313 Aggregation.

Refer to § 1010.313 of this chapter for reports of transactions in currency aggregation requirements for brokers or dealers in securities.
#### § 29.515 Judicial review.

An individual whose request for reconsideration has been denied (in whole or part) in a final decision by the Department under § 29.513 may, within 180 days of the date of the final decision, file a civil action in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Any such civil action must be filed in accordance with the rules of that court.
§ 3.5 Limitations on authority to approve claims. ( a ) All proposed awards, compromises or settlements in excess of $25,000 require the prior written approval of the Attorney General.
( b ) All claims which fall within the provisions of 28 CFR 14.6(b) require referral to and consultation with the Department of Justice.
( c ) Any claim which falls within paragraph (a) or (b) of this section shall be reviewed by the General Counsel. If the claim, award, compromise, or settlement receives the approval of the General Counsel and the head of the bureau or office or his designee, a letter shall be prepared for the signature of the General Counsel transmitting to the Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division, Department of Justice, the case for approval or consultation as required by 28 CFR 14.6. Such letter shall conform with the requirements set forth in 28 CFR 14.7.
265-/5

ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA #14-13-00900-CR OFFENSE: Capital Murder

STYLE: Lakendrick Earl Jacobs v The State of Texas COUNTY: Harris

COA DISPOSITION: Affirmed th TRIAL COURT: 3381" District Court

DATE: February 19, 2015 Publish: No TC CASE #: 1289471

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

STYLE: Lakendrick Earl Jacobs v The State of Texas

CCA #

PkO SE Petition CCA Disposition:

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: DATE:

a4*5W/

DATE: Obl&tUr

JUDGE: ^R'>***•

JUDGE:.

SIGNED:

PUBLISH:

PC:

DNP:

FOR REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

MOTION FOR

ELECTRONIC RECORD
# L_2020009DE.01007501.xml

| 15.1.2020 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 9/75 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2020

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 9/75

---

Berichtigung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) 2019/1213 der Kommission vom 12. Juli 2019 zur näheren Regelung der Sicherstellung einheitlicher Bedingungen für die Verwirklichung der Interoperabilität und Kompatibilität bordeigener Wiegesysteme nach der Richtlinie 96/53/EG des Rates

(Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 192 vom 18. Juli 2019)

Seite 2, Artikel 1 Absatz 2:

Anstatt:

„Für Mitgliedstaaten, die nicht nach Artikel 10d Absatz 1 der Richtlinie 96/53/EG für die Einführung bordeigener Wiegesysteme optiert haben, sollte diese Verordnung nicht gelten.“

muss es heißen:

„Diese Verordnung gilt nicht für Mitgliedstaaten, die nicht nach Artikel 10d Absatz 1 der Richtlinie 96/53/EG für die Einführung bordeigener Wiegesysteme optiert haben.“

---
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 159 (Wednesday, August 19, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 41967]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19912]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6731]


Waiver of Restriction on Assistance to the Central Government of 
Turkmenistan

    Pursuant to section 7088(c)(2) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2009 (Division H, 
Pub. L. 111-8) (``the Act''), and Department of State Delegation of 
Authority Number 245-1, I hereby determine that it is important to the 
national interest of the United States to waive the requirements of 
section 7088(c)(1) of the Act with respect to the Government of 
Turkmenistan, and I hereby waive such restriction.
    This determination shall be reported to the Congress, and published 
in the Federal Register.

     Dated: Jul 14 2009.
Jacob L. Lew,
Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. E9-19912 Filed 8-18-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-46-P
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 24, 2023

NO. 03

- 21

- 00514

- CV

The State of Texas , Appellant

v.

Elgin Independent School District; Board of Trustees of Elgin Independent School District;

Dr. Jodi Duron in her Official Capacity as Superintendent of the Elgin Independent School

District; and Byron Mitchell, Beth Walterscheidt, Angie Edmon, Juanita Valarie Neidig,

Pete Bega, JD Harkins, and David Glass in their Official Capacities as Trustees of the

Elgin Inde pendent School District , Appellee s

APPEAL FROM THE 21ST DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND THEOFANIS

VACATED AND DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE THEOFANIS

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the district court on October 6 , 202 1 . Having

reviewed the record, it appears that appell ant ’s claims have become moot. Therefore, the Court

vacates the district court’s judgment and di smisses the c ase for want of jurisdiction. Appellant

shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, b oth in this Court and in the court below.
#### Douglas L. Evans, as Administrator of the Estate of Isaac A. Evans, Deceased, Appellant, v Prudential Financial, Inc., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant. (Action No. 1.) Laurie L. Willard, as Coadministrator of the Estate of Robert W. Willard, Deceased, Appellant, v Douglas L. Evans, as Administrator of the Estate of Isaac A. Evans, Deceased, et al., Defendants, and Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company et al., Respondents. (Action No. 2.)

[803 NYS2d 452]

Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County (Rose H. Sconiers, J.), entered November 19, 2004. The order granted the motion of defendants Prudential Financial, Inc., Frederick W. Ingles and Shirley J. Ingles for summary judgment dismissing the complaints and cross claims against them and declared that defendant Prudential Financial, Inc. has no obligation to defend or indemnify any of the remaining defendants.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by vacating the declaration and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted the motion of defendants Prudential Financial, Inc. (Prudential), Frederick W. Ingles and Shirley J. Ingles for summary judgment dismissing the complaints and cross claims against them. Plaintiffs lack standing to bring actions against Prudential because they have not obtained a judgment against Prudential’s insureds *(see*Insurance Law § 3420 [b] [1]; *Lang v Hanover Ins. Co.,*3 NY3d 350, 354-355 [2004]). Because plaintiffs lack standing, the court erred in declaring the rights of the parties *(see Lang,*3 NY3d at 355), and we therefore modify the order accordingly. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Gorski, Martoche, Pine and Lawton, JJ.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 138

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to require that courts, upon the

criminal conviction under that Act, notify the employer of the convicted

person.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. SOLOMON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to require that

courts, upon the criminal conviction under that Act, notify the employer of the convicted person.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Employer Notification

5 Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ACT.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Controlled Substances Act is

8 amended by adding at the end of part D the following:
2

•HR 138 IH

1 ‘‘NOTIFICATION OF EMPLOYERS

2 ‘‘SEC. 423. Upon the conviction of a person for an

3 offense under this title or title III, the court shall notify

4 the employer of such person of that conviction.’’.

5 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents

6 of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control

7 Act of 1970 is amended by inserting after the item relat8 ing to section 422 the following:

‘‘Sec. 423. Notification of employers.’’.

Æ
§ 57.6302-1 Method of paying the health insurance providers fee. ( a ) *Fee to be paid by electronic funds transfer.* Under the authority of section 6302(a), the fee imposed on covered entities engaged in the business of providing health insurance for United States health risks under section 9010 and § 57.4 must be paid by electronic funds transfer as defined in § 31.6302-1(h)(4)(i) of this chapter, as if the fee were a depository tax. For the time for paying the fee, see § 57.7.
( b ) *Effective/Applicability date.* This section applies with respect to any fee that is due on or after September 30, 2014.
#### Sheila Femia, Respondent, v Steven Femia, Appellant.

[805 NYS2d 217]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Herkimer County (Michael E. Daley, J.), entered March 29, 2005. The order, inter alia, awarded temporary custody of the parties’ children to plaintiff.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Herkimer County, for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: Supreme Court erred in, inter alia, awarding temporary custody of the parties’ children to plaintiff during the pendency of this divorce action without conducting an evidentiary hearing *(see Van Etten v Van Etten,*207 AD2d 992 [1994]; *see generally Matter of Smith v Brown,*272 AD2d 993 [2000]; *Matter of Smith v Patrowski,*226 AD2d 1073, 1073-1074 [1996]). Thus, we reverse the order and remit the matter to Supreme Court for a hearing and a new determination with findings of fact. Fresent—Hurlbutt, J.P., Scudder, Gorski, Smith and Lawton, JJ.