alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DAPHNEY D. WILLIAMS,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-844

[December 12, 2019]

Appeal from the State of Florida, Department of Health; L.T. Case Nos. 

DOAH 18-002826, DOH 2017-10803.

Kenneth S. Mair of Law Offices of Kenneth Mair, Fort Lauderdale, for 

appellant.

Sarah Young Hodges, Chief Appellate Counsel, Florida Department of 

Health Prosecution Services Unit, Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, GERBER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### § 28.600 Notice of covered programs.

Within 60 days of September 29, 2000, each Federal agency that awards Federal financial assistance shall publish in the Federal Register a notice of the programs covered by these Title IX regulations. Each such Federal agency shall periodically republish the notice of covered programs to reflect changes in covered programs. Copies of this notice also shall be made available upon request to the Federal agency's office that enforces Title IX.
HomeBiographies...Beth Van Schaack

# 				Beth Van Schaack			

															Ambassador-at-Large for Global Criminal Justice						Office of Global Criminal Justice												

				March 17, 2022 -									Present							

Dr. Beth Van Schaack was sworn in as the Department’s sixth Ambassador-at-Large for Global Criminal Justice (GCJ) on March 17, 2022. In this role, she advises the Secretary of State and other Department leadership on issues related to the prevention of and response to atrocity crimes, including war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide.

Ambassador Van Schaack served as Deputy to the Ambassador-at-Large in GCJ from 2012 to 2013. Prior to returning to public service in 2022, Ambassador Van Schaack was the Leah Kaplan Visiting Professor in Human Rights at Stanford Law School, where she taught international criminal law, human rights, human trafficking, and a policy lab on Legal & Policy Tools for Preventing Atrocities. In addition, she directed Stanford’s International Human Rights & Conflict Resolution Clinic. Ambassador Van Schaack began her academic career at Santa Clara University School of Law, where, in addition to teaching and writing on international human rights issues, she served as the Academic Adviser to the United States interagency delegation to the International Criminal Court Review Conference in Kampala, Uganda. Earlier in her career, she was a practicing lawyer at Morrison & Foerster, LLP; the Center for Justice & Accountability, a human rights law firm; and the Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunals for Rwanda and the Former Yugoslavia in The Hague.

Ambassador Van Schaack has published numerous articles and papers on international human rights and justice issues, including her 2020 thesis, Imagining Justice for Syria (Oxford University Press). From 2014 to 2022, she served as Executive Editor for Just Security, an online forum for the analysis of national security, foreign policy, and rights. She is a graduate of Stanford (BA), Yale (JD) and Leiden (PhD) Universities.

Tags

Office of Global Criminal JusticeState Department Official

Back to Top
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

EIT HOLDINGS LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

YELP!, INC., 

Defendant-Appellee. 

____________________ 

2012-1192 

______________________

 

 Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of California in No. 10-CV-5623, Judge 

William H. Alsup. 

______________________ 

JUDGMENT 

______________________ 

ALISA A. LIPSKI, Goldstein & Lipski, PLLC, of 

Houston, Texas, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With her 

on the brief was EDWARD W. GOLDSTEIN. 

DARALYN J. DURIE, Durie Tangri LLP, of San 

Francisco, California, argued for defendant-appellee. 

With her on the brief were RYAN M. KENT and EUGENE 

NOVIKOV. 

______________________ 
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, LINN and WALLACH, 

Circuit Judges). 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 October 9, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

 Date Jan Horbaly 

 Clerk
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 315.22 Payment or reissue pursuant to judgment. ( a ) *Divorce.* The Department of the Treasury will recognize a divorce decree that ratifies or confirms a property settlement agreement disposing of bonds or that otherwise settles the interests of the parties in a bond. Reissue of a savings bond may be made to eliminate the name of one spouse as owner, coowner, or beneficiary, or to substitute the name of one spouse for that of the other spouse as owner, coowner, or beneficiary pursuant to the decree. However, if the bond is registered in the name of one spouse with another person as coowner, there must be submitted either: ( 1 ) A request for reissue by the other person or
( 2 ) A certified copy of a judgment, decree, or court order entered in proceedings to which the other person and the spouse named on the bond are parties, determining the extent of the interest of that spouse in the bond. Reissue will be permitted only to the extent of that spouse's interest. The evidence required under § 315.23 must be submitted in every case. When the divorce decree does not set out the terms of the property settlement agreement, a certified copy of the agreement must be submitted. Payment, rather than reissue, will be made if requested.
( b ) *Gift causa mortis.* A savings bond belonging solely to one individual will be paid or reissued at the request of the person found by a court to be entitled by reason of a gift causa mortis from the sole owner.
( c ) *Date for determining rights.* When payment or reissue under this section is to be made, the rights of the parties will be those existing under the regulations current at the time of the entry of the final judgment, decree, or court order.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 235.6 Implementing instructions.

Procedural instructions implementing these regulations will be issued by the Commissioner of the Bureau of the Fiscal Service in volume I, part 4 of the Treasury Financial Manual.

[54 FR 35642, Aug. 29, 1989]
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-14-0000874

22-JUN-2017

11:35 AM
Exhibit 10.2 - Chief Financial Officer and Other Named Officer Compensation

         The Bank's Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Executive
Officer Compensation Committee, approved 2006 bonuses for the Chief Financial
Officer and one named officer, both of whom are participants in the
discretionary executive bonus pool and whose bonuses are not subject to
predetermined formulas, as follows: Donald A. Pitcher -- $105,000; and Thomas M.
Shepherd -- $120,000.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 341.4 Proof of purchase.

At the time a Retirement Plan Bond is issued, the issuing agent will furnish therewith to the purchaser, and in cases where the purchaser is different from the person in whose name the bond is inscribed, to the registered owner as well, proof of the purchase on Form PD 3550. The form will show the names and addresses of the purchaser and of the registered owner, the latter's date of birth, social security account number and his classification (*i.e.*, self-employed individual or employee) the number of bonds issued, a description thereof by issue date, serial numbers, denominations, and registration, together with information as to the amount of his contributions (if any) toward the purchase price of the bonds.
#### Adams *v.*Leath.

[No. 20,222.

Filed March 17, 1965.]

*David Adams, pro se.*

*Kenneth A. King,*of Kendallville, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Appellee herein on January 15, 1965, filed a verified motion to dismiss this appeal for the reason that appellant’s brief was not filed within thirty days after submission as required by Rule 2-15 of the Supreme Court, 1964 Revision.

The record discloses that the transcript and the assignment of errors herein were filed with the Clerk of this Court on October 12, 1964. On November 6, 1964, appellant filed his petition for extension of time to file brief. On November 10, 1964, appellant’s petition for extension of time was granted to and including *84December 11, 1964. No brief has been filed by appellant in this appeal.

Rule 2-15, *supra,*provides that if the brief is not filed within the time limited the Clerk shall enter an order dismissing the appeal unless petition for extension of time is on file. *Members, etc.*v. *Adams*(1960), 240 Ind. 280, 282, 163 N. E. 2d 745.

Appellee’s verified motion to dismiss is hereby sustained; and the Clerk of this court is hereby ordered to dismiss the appeal herein for failure to comply with Rule. 2-15, *supra.*

Note. — Reported in 205 N. E. 2d 178.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 306.78 Nontransferable securities.

The provisions of this subpart, so far as applicable, govern assignments of Treasury Bonds, Investment Series B-1975-80.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 134508 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, GERALD KREMPOSKI, as Personal Justices 

Representative of the Estate of IRENE

KREMPOSKI, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 134508 

 COA: 275522 

Gogebic CC: 06-000277-NH 

MARSHFIELD CLINIC and MARVIN 

E. KUEHNER, M.D.,

Defendants-Appellants, 

and 

SUPERIOR HOME NURSING AND 

HOSPICE and ST. JOSEPH’S HOSPITAL,

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Chief Justice, a stipulation signed by counsel for the parties 

agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the 

application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs. 

d1023 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 26, 2007 

Clerk
| 1. | I am a duly authorized officer of BMW Financial Services NA, LLC; |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | I have reviewed the terms of that certain Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 30, 1995 (the “Basic Servicing Agreement”), between Financial Services Vehicle Trust (the                  “Trust”) and BMW Financial Services NA, LLC, as servicer (in such capacity, the “Servicer”), as supplemented by the 2017-1 Servicing Supplement, dated as of March 22, 2017 (together with the Basic Servicing Agreement, the “Servicing                  Agreement”), among the Trust, BMW Manufacturing L.P., as grantor and initial beneficiary of the Trust, and BMW Financial Services NA, LLC, as sponsor and as Servicer, and I have made, or have caused to be made under my supervision, a                  review of the activities of the Servicer and the performance of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement during the period from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018; and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | to the best of my knowledge, based on the review described in paragraph 2 above, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all                  material respects during the period from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-2863

___________

Woodrow Anderson, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

James Purkett, Superintendent, * Appeal from the United States

ERDCC; Terry Bishop, RN; Deborah * District Court for the

Carter, RN, * Eastern District of Missouri.

*

Defendants, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

CMS; Charles Chastain, Doctor; *

Donna Adams, RN; Tina Hayes, RN; *

Tymber Spray, RN, Director of *

Nursing, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: October 21, 2009

Filed: November 9, 2009

___________

Before MURPHY, COLLOTON and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.
1

The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri.

-2-

Missouri inmate Woodrow Anderson appeals following the district court’s1

adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having carefully

reviewed the record, see Johnson v. Blaukat, 453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir. 2006)

(standard of review), we conclude that summary judgment was properly granted and

that the district court did not err in denying Anderson’s discovery motions and his

motions for appointment of counsel. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 21, 2012

d0514 

# Order

May 21, 2012

144393

RONELY DESHON CHAMBERS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 144393 COA: 302064 Oakland CC: 2009-103537-CK JEFFREY B. HOLLANDER and LAW OFFICES OF JEFF REY B. HOLLANDER, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 12, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM LIDAK
PHARMACEUTICALS FIRST QUARTER FISCAL 1998 10Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH DECEMBER 31, 1997 10Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          13,093
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      211
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,494
<PP&E>                                           1,352
<DEPRECIATION>                                     480
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,443
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,252
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        57,937
<OTHER-SE>                                     (46,746)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,443
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   220
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,561
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  35
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,341)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,341)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.03)
        

</TABLE>
Union Calendar No. 72

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1077

[Report No. 104–155]

A BILL

To authorize the Bureau of Land Management.

JUNE 22, 1995

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Commitordered to be printed tee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and
IB

Union Calendar No. 72

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1077

[Report No. 104–155]

To authorize the Bureau of Land Management.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 28, 1995

Mr. HANSEN (for himself, Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, Mr. REGULA, Mr. HEFLEY,

Mr. TORKILDSEN, Mr. COOLEY, Mrs. SMITH of Washington, and Mr.

SHADEGG) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

JUNE 22, 1995

Additional sponsors: Mr. ALLARD, Mr. RADANOVICH, Mr. WATTS of Oklahoma, Mr. HERGER, Mr. STUMP, Mr. EMERSON, Mr. SKEEN, Mr.

CREMEANS, and Mrs. WALDHOLTZ

JUNE 22, 1995

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic]

A BILL

To authorize the Bureau of Land Management.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That (a) subsection (a) of section 318 of the Federal Land
2

•HR 1077 RH

1 Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1748)

2 is amended to read as follows:

3 ‘‘(a) There are authorized to be appropriated such

4 sums as may be necessary to carry out this Act.’’.

5 (b) Subsection (b) of such section is repealed, and

6 subsections (c) and (d) of such section are redesignated

7 as subsections (b) and (c), respectively.

8 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE AND STATUTORY REFERENCE.

9 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the

10 ‘‘BLM Reauthorization Act of 1995’’.

11 (b) STATUTORY REFERENCE.—As used in this Act, the

12 term ‘‘the Act’’ means the Federal Land Policy and Man13 agement Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.).

14 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION AND FUTURE REAUTHORIZA15 TIONS.

16 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—Section 318(a) of the Act (43

17 U.S.C. 1748(a)) is amended by striking out ‘‘October 1,

18 1978’’ and by inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘October 1, 2001’’.

19 (b) FUTURE REAUTHORIZATIONS.—Section 318(b) of

20 the Act is amended by striking ‘‘May 15, 1977, and not

21 later than May 15 of each second even numbered year there22 after’’ and by inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘January 1, 1999,

23 and January 1 of each third odd-numbered year there24 after’’.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Assistant Secretary Phee’s Travel to Nigeria

# 									Assistant Secretary Phee’s Travel to Nigeria							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

December 7, 2023

Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs Molly Phee will travel to Nigeria on December 8, 2023, to engage with regional leaders who will be gathering for the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS)’s December 10 Heads of State Summit.  During her visit, she will consult with West African leaders on how the United States can best support regional efforts to return Niger to a democratic path and to promote security, stability, prosperity, and democracy in the Sahel.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsNigeriaOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,870
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,942
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (64)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         103,950
<DEPRECIATION>                                (74,163)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,952
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         13,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,278
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,952
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,770
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,784
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    27
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 269
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    667
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                667
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       667
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06


</TABLE>