alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Pension Assets Partnership  1989-C,  Ltd.'s  balance  sheet and  statement  of
operations contained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2000 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         60,280
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  39,008
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               99,288
<PP&E>                                         2,321,432
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,143,220)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 277,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,179
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     273,321
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   277,500
<SALES>                                        16,544
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               17,400
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  6,824<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,982)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,982)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,982)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>



</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 328.5 Forms of endorsement. ( a ) *When presented by banks* — ( 1 ) *For payment or exchange.* The endorsement placed on a bearer security presented for payment or exchange by a bank should be in the following form: For presentation to the Federal Reserve Bank of __________, Fiscal Agent of the United States, for redemption or in exchange for securities of a new issue, in accordance with written instructions submitted by __________. (Insert name of presenting bank)
( 2 ) *For redemption at par.* The endorsement placed on a bearer security presented for redemption at par in payment of Federal estate taxes should be in the following form: For presentation to the Federal Reserve Bank of ________, Fiscal Agent of the United States, for redemption at par in payment of Federal estate taxes, in accordance with written instructions submitted by ________________. (Insert name of presenting bank)
( b ) *For conversion to book-entry securities.* The endorsement placed on a bearer security presented for conversion to a book-entry security shall be in the following form: For presentation to the Federal Reserve Bank of _________, Fiscal Agent of the United States, for conversion to book-entry securities by _________. (Insert name of presenting bank)
( c ) *When presented by Service Center Directors or District Directors, Internal Revenue Service.* The endorsement placed on a bearer security by a Service Center Director or a District Director, Internal Revenue Service, should be in the following form:
For presentation to the Federal Reserve Bank of _______;, Fiscal Agent of the United States, for redemption, the proceeds to be credited to the account of the Service Center Director, Internal Revenue Service, at _____, for credit on the Federal _________ (Income, gifts, or other) taxes due from _________. (Name and address)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0368

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

THOMAS WILLIAM SIGEA,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including November 2, 2020, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 23 2020

09/23/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0368
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Ambassador Fick’s Travel to India and Sri Lanka

# 									Ambassador Fick’s Travel to India and Sri Lanka							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

August 16, 2023

From August 17 to 23, 2023, Ambassador at Large for Cyberspace and Digital Policy Nathaniel C. Fick will travel to India and Sri Lanka.

In India from August 17 to 20, Ambassador Fick will head the U.S. delegation to the G20 Digital Economy Ministerial Meeting in Bengaluru.  He will highlight U.S. views on digital economy topics including priority areas set by India’s G20 presidency: digital public infrastructure, security in the digital economy, and digital skilling.  Ambassador Fick will also meet with technology entrepreneurs and other representatives from industry and civil society.

Ambassador Fick will then travel to Sri Lanka from August 20 to 23.  He will hold bilateral consultations in Colombo with a range of counterparts in government, the private sector, and think tanks on cybersecurity, information and communications technologies, and digital freedom.

Follow the Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital Policy on Twitter @StateCDP.

Tags

Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital PolicyBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsIndiaOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial International TravelSri Lanka

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
40472.

#### RICHARDSON v. ANDERSON.

Hall, Judge.

The parties in this appeal claim title to real estate which the Housing Authority of the City of Atlanta brought an action to condemn. The defendant in error filed an answer in the condemnation suit praying (a) that fee simple title to the tract of land be decreed in her and (b) that she have judgment awarding her the fund found to be the value of the tract. The plaintiff in error prayed for similar relief. It was stipulated that the construction of the will, which was all of the evidence in the case, was the sole issue to be determined by the judge without a jury. The trial court entered up a judgment construing the will in favor of *843the defendant in error; however, the record does not show that there has been a condemnation award. The writ of error to the Supreme Court (construction of a will) was transferred to this court by a holding that “The sole question was who was entitled to the funds. . . ” There being no final judgment as yet on this question, the writ of error must be dismissed for lack of a final judgment over which this court has jurisdiction. *Code Ann.*§ 6-701.

Decided January 16, 1964.

*Scott, Scroggins, Cash & Crim, Frank T. Cash,*for plaintiff in error.

*Foster & Fudge, Norman H. Fudge,*contra.

*Writ of error dismissed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Bussell, J., concur.*
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1364 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1364

  To amend the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act to provide for community 
  approval before Indian class III gaming operations may take effect.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 30, 1995

  Mr. Everett (for himself Mr. Bachus, Mr. Browder, Mr. Hancock, Mr. 
LaFalce, Mr. Saxton, Mr. Smith of Michigan, and Mr. Talent) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act to provide for community 
  approval before Indian class III gaming operations may take effect.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMMUNITY APPROVAL OF TRIBAL-STATE COMPACTS.

    Section 11(d) of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 
2710(d)) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(10)(A) A Tribal-State compact may not take effect until after--
            ``(i) the elected governing body and elected executive 
        officials (including the city council, county commissioner, 
        mayor, and similar positions) in the political jurisdiction in 
        which a class III gaming activity under the compact is to occur 
        have approved the compact; and
            ``(ii) the compact is then approved by majority vote in a 
        referendum held in each such political subdivision in the first 
        general election (with respect to which the filing deadline has 
        not passed) occurring after the date on which the compact is 
        approved under clause (i).
    ``(B) For the purposes of subparagraph (A), a Tribal-State compact 
includes a compact approved under paragraph (8) or consented to under 
paragraph (7)(B)(vi), and the procedures for a class III gaming 
activity prescribed under paragraph (7)(B)(vii).''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act shall apply to any Tribal-State 
compact which has not been entered into under the Indian Gaming 
Regulatory Act before January 1, 1994.
                                 <all>
```
IV

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 55

Requesting the President to return the enrolled bill (H.R. 831), and providing

for its reenrollment without the targeted tax benefit contained therein.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 4, 1995

Mr. DEUTSCH submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the

Committee on House Oversight, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Requesting the President to return the enrolled bill (H.R.

831), and providing for its reenrollment without the targeted tax benefit contained therein.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the President of the United States is

3 requested to return to the House of Representatives the

4 enrolled bill (H.R. 831) to amend the Internal Revenue

5 Code of 1986 to permanently extend the deduction for the

6 health insurance costs of self-employed individuals, to re7 peal the provision permitting nonrecognition of gain on

8 sales and exchanges effectuating policies of the Federal
2

•HCON 55 IH

1 Communications Commission, and for other purposes. The

2 Clerk of the House is authorized to receive such bill if

3 it is returned when the House is not in session. Upon the

4 return of such bill, the action of the Speaker of the House

5 of Representatives and the Acting President pro tempore

6 of the Senate in signing it shall be deemed rescinded and

7 the Clerk of the House shall reenroll the bill with the fol8 lowing corrections: In subparagraph (B) of section 2(d)(2)

9 of the bill (relating to sales contingent on issuance of cer10 tificate)—

11 (1) strike clause (ii), and

12 (2) strike

13 ‘‘(B) SALES CONTINGENT ON ISSUANCE OF

14 CERTIFICATE.—

15 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—A contract’’

16 and insert

17 ‘‘(B) SALES CONTINGENT ON ISSUANCE OF

18 CERTIFICATE.—A contract’’.

Æ
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rodrigo Garcia, Appellant.

[804 NYS2d 273]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Boklan, J.), rendered July 17, 2002, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on this direct appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1900]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

The defendant has not raised any nonfrivolous issue in his supplemental pro se brief which can be reviewed on this direct *676appeal. Florio, J.P.E, Krausman, Crane, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur.
# L_2023142DE.01004501.xml

| 1.6.2023 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 142/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2023

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 142/45

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) 2020/852 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 18. Juni 2020 über die Einrichtung eines Rahmens zur Erleichterung nachhaltiger Investitionen und zur Änderung der Verordnung (EU) 2019/2088

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 198 vom 22. Juni 2020
  )

Seite 27, Artikel 2 Nummer 22 Buchstabe a

Anstatt:

| „a) | im Fall von Oberflächengewässern, sowohl ein „gutes ökologisches Potenzial“ im Sinne des Artikels 2 Nummer 22 der Richtlinie 2000/60/EG als auch einen „guten chemischen Zustand des Oberflächengewässers“ gemäß Artikel 2 Nummer 24 jener Richtlinie;“ |
| --- | --- |

„a)

im Fall von Oberflächengewässern, sowohl ein „gutes ökologisches Potenzial“ im Sinne des Artikels 2 Nummer 22 der Richtlinie 2000/60/EG als auch einen „guten chemischen Zustand des Oberflächengewässers“ gemäß Artikel 2 Nummer 24 jener Richtlinie;“

muss es heißen:

| „a) | im Fall von Oberflächengewässern, sowohl einen „guten ökologischen Zustand“ im Sinne des Artikels 2 Nummer 22 der Richtlinie 2000/60/EG als auch einen „guten chemischen Zustand des Oberflächengewässers“ gemäß Artikel 2 Nummer 24 jener Richtlinie;“ |
| --- | --- |

„a)

im Fall von Oberflächengewässern, sowohl einen „guten ökologischen Zustand“ im Sinne des Artikels 2 Nummer 22 der Richtlinie 2000/60/EG als auch einen „guten chemischen Zustand des Oberflächengewässers“ gemäß Artikel 2 Nummer 24 jener Richtlinie;“

Seite 27, Artikel 2 Nummer 22 Buchstabe b

Anstatt:

| „b) | im Fall von Grundwasser, sowohl „einen „guten chemischen Zustand des Grundwassers“ im Sinne des Artikels 2 Nummer 25 der Richtlinie 2000/60/EG als auch einen „guten mengenmäßigen Zustand“ gemäß Artikel 2 Nummer 28 jener Richtlinie;“ |
| --- | --- |

„b)

im Fall von Grundwasser, sowohl „einen „guten chemischen Zustand des Grundwassers“ im Sinne des Artikels 2 Nummer 25 der Richtlinie 2000/60/EG als auch einen „guten mengenmäßigen Zustand“ gemäß Artikel 2 Nummer 28 jener Richtlinie;“

muss es heißen:

| „b) | im Fall von Grundwasser, sowohl einen „guten chemischen Zustand des Grundwassers“ im Sinne des Artikels 2 Nummer 25 der Richtlinie 2000/60/EG als auch einen „guten mengenmäßigen Zustand“ gemäß Artikel 2 Nummer 28 jener Richtlinie;“ |
| --- | --- |

„b)

im Fall von Grundwasser, sowohl einen „guten chemischen Zustand des Grundwassers“ im Sinne des Artikels 2 Nummer 25 der Richtlinie 2000/60/EG als auch einen „guten mengenmäßigen Zustand“ gemäß Artikel 2 Nummer 28 jener Richtlinie;“

---
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 159 (Wednesday, August 19, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 41907]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19847]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. [thinsp]225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than September 3, 2009.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Steve Foley, Vice President) 
1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:
    1. Richard Franklin Combs, Braselton, Georgia; to retain voting 
shares of Verity Capital Group, Inc., Dahlonega, Georgia, and thereby 
indirectly retain voting shares of Verity Bank, Winder, Georgia.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacqueline G. King, 
Community Affairs Officer) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 
55480-0291:
    1. Dennis G. Bilski, individually and as part of a group acting in 
concert along with the Marsha L. Ritt Revocable Living Trust, co-
trustees Marsha L. Ritt, Dennis G. Bilski, Londa G. Bilksi, all of 
Plymouth, Minnesota; Gerald A. Bilksi, Sandra J. Bilski, Michael A. 
Adducci, Debra J. Adducci, John C. Holper, Linda M. Holper, all of 
Woodbury, Minnesota; Michael A. Bilski and Jacqueline S. Bilski, both 
of Fridley, Minnesota; to retain voting shares of N.A. Corporation, and 
thereby indirectly retain voting shares of North American Banking 
Company, both of Roseville, Minnesota.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 14, 
2009.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-19847 Filed 8-18-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Angola National Day

# 									Angola National Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

November 10, 2021

On behalf of the American people and the Government of the United States, I offer congratulations to all Angolans as you celebrate your independence.

The United States appreciates the strong bilateral relationship between our two countries, and we look forward to continued strategic dialogue and cooperation. I commend Angola on its continued economic reforms and diversification efforts, and we applaud your commitment to combatting corruption and holding accountable those who have profited at the expense of the Angolan people. 

Also, as we continue to respond to challenges presented by the COVID-19 pandemic, I affirm our shared commitment to health security and regional stability.

Best wishes as you commemorate this important day.

Tags

AngolaBureau of African AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
Exhibit 32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of HQ Sustainable Maritime Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10Q for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Norbert Sporns, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002, to
the best of his knowledge, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 15, 2007



/s/ Norbert SpornsNorbert SpornsChief Executive Officer
#### Gressel et vir v. The Polish-American Association

*C. Salkind,*for plaintiffs.

*R. S. Croskey,*for defendant.

November 4, 1953.

Smith, P. J.,

This matter comes before the court on plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial. The action was in trespass. Wife plaintiff claims that she was caused to be injured as the result of an act of negligence on the part of defendant in spreading and allowing to remain a large quantity of wax on a dance floor on which she was dancing. The jury after a careful charge by the trial judge, Alessandroni, J., brought in a verdict for husband plaintiff for the full amount of his medical expenses in the sum of $376.50, but in the wife’s case brought in a verdict for defendant.

The trial Judge in part of his charge clearly stated *86the issue. He said, “Only in the event that you find the floor was so waxed by a servant or employe of the club as to create a dangerous condition, should you consider a verdict for plaintiffs.” The jury by its one verdict clearly indicates that there was no negligence on the part of defendant or else a contributory negligence on the part of female plaintiff. Yet it at the same time reimbursed husband plaintiff for his medical expenses. These two verdicts do not come within the realms of logic or common sense and cannot hold. The whole matter was left to the jury. It was their problem and they have brought in an inconsistent verdict which cannot be reconciled by the court. A case somewhat similar is Ernst et al. v. Houser, 7 D. & C. 488, where a minor son was injured in an automobile accident. The jury brought in a verdict of $1 for father plaintiff, whose medical expenses were in the sum of $269.12, and for defendant in the action where the minor son was plaintiff. The court held:

“The uncontradicted evidence submitted to establish the damages of Albert Ernst in his own right shows his loss to have been $269.12. The jury’s award of $1, based upon this testimony, however inadequate it may appear to be, nevertheless, convicts the defendant of negligence. For the pain and suffering endured by Jeremiah Ernst, properly proved, the jury awarded nothing. He was entitled to some damages.

“The verdict of the jury is inconsistent, and the damages awarded are inadequate. It was rendered in disregard of the evidence, and the law, and the charge of the court. A new trial is, therefore, granted. See Bradwell v. Railway Co., 139 Pa. 405, 413, 414; Hammaker v. Watts Township, 71 Pa. Superior Ct. 554, 558. Rule for a new trial is hereby made absolute.”

We are of the opinion that the verdicts must be set aside and a new trial had.
Home...Acting Deputy Secretary Bass Travels to New York

# 									Acting Deputy Secretary Bass Travels to New York							

Office of the Spokesperson

February 24, 2023

Acting Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources John R. Bass will travel to New York February 27 for meetings at the United Nations and the U.S. Mission to the United Nations.  Acting Deputy Secretary Bass will meet with UN Under-Secretary-General for Management Strategy, Policy, and Compliance Catherine Pollard to renew the longstanding U.S. commitment to the United Nations.  Acting Deputy Secretary Bass will meet with the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) to reiterate the U.S. commitment to the humanitarian relief efforts in Türkiye and Syria.  He will also meet with senior leadership at the U.S. Mission to the United Nations, including Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield and Ambassador to the UN for Management and Reform Christopher Lu.

Media inquiries may be submitted to the Office of Press Relations.

Tags

Deputy Secretary of State for Management and ResourcesNew YorkOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top