alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Les Juncaj, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[803 NYS2d 768]

Mercure, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 3, 2004, which, inter alia, suspended claimant’s right to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he lost his employment due to an industrial controversy.

Claimant, a unionized employee, worked as a general helper performing maintenance on a fleet of delivery trucks for his employer, a baked goods company. His union called for a strike in response to the employer’s plan to downsize its operations. Claimant participated in the strike and, although he expected to be laid off, was retained at the conclusion of the strike.

Nevertheless, claimant applied for and received unemployment insurance benefits during the strike, representing in his application that his separation from employment was due to the elimination of his position. Subsequently, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board suspended claimant’s benefits on the ground that his separation from employment was the result of an industrial controversy. Claimant was charged with a recoverable overpayment pursuant to Labor Law § 597 (4), and his right to receive future benefits was reduced by eight days because of his willful misrepresentation of the reason for his loss of employment. Claimant now appeals.

*778The record reflects that claimant did not work from February 7, 2003 through March 26, 2003 because he was participating in the strike. Thus, substantial evidence supports the Board’s determination suspending benefits on the ground that claimant lost his employment due to an industrial controversy *(see*Labor Law § 592 [1]; *Matter of Reardon [Commissioner of Labor],*16 AD3d 859, 860 [2005]). Moreover, claimant’s position was not eliminated prior to or during the strike and, indeed, claimant was advised by both his union and his employer that participating in the strike might affect his eligibility for unemployment benefits and that he should disclose all of the circumstances surrounding his unemployment. Nonetheless, in his application for benefits, claimant stated that his loss of employment was due to the elimination of his position and he did not disclose that there was an ongoing industrial controversy in which he was participating. Under these circumstances, the Board’s determination that claimant was chargeable with a recoverable overpayment of benefits, as well as a forfeiture of eight days of future benefits, was proper *(see*Labor Law § 597 [4]; *Matter of Reardon [Commissioner of Labor], supra*at 861; *Matter of Spangler [Commissioner of Labor],*7 AD3d 848, 849 [2004]; *see also Matter of Runco [Commissioner of Labor],*23 AD3d 776 [2005] [decided herewith]).

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2541

To establish an Assistant Secretary of State for Diplomatic Security.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 26, 1995

Mr. GILMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on International Relations

A BILL

To establish an Assistant Secretary of State for Diplomatic

Security.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF ASSISTANT SECRETARY

4 OF STATE FOR DIPLOMATIC SECURITY.

5 There shall be in the Department of State an Assist6 ant Secretary of State for Diplomatic Security who shall

7 be responsible to the Secretary of State for matters relat8 ing to diplomatic security. The Assistant Secretary shall

9 have substantial professional qualifications in the field of

10 law enforcement, intelligence, or security and shall be ap11 pointed and compensated as provided under section
2

•HR 2541 IH

1 1(c)(1) of the State Department Basic Authorities Act of

2 1956.

Æ
# L_2022277DE.01031501.xml

| 27.10.2022 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 277/315 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2022

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 277/315

---

Berichtigung der Delegierten Verordnung (EU) 2019/625 der Kommission vom 4. März 2019 zur Ergänzung der Verordnung (EU) 2017/625 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates hinsichtlich der Anforderungen an den Eingang von Sendungen bestimmter für den menschlichen Verzehr bestimmter Tiere und Waren in die Union

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 131 vom 17. Mai 2019
  )

Seite 27, Artikel 9 Absatz 2:

Anstatt:

„(2)   Nach Erstellung der in Artikel 8 Absatz 1 genannten Listen und wenn die zuständigen Behörden des Drittlandes ausreichende Garantien betreffend die Verwaltung und Überwachung der in ihre Zuständigkeit fallenden Erzeugungsgebiete geben, muss ein Kontrollbesuch der Kommission vor Ort erst stattfinden, wenn ein neues Erzeugungsgebiet in eine bestehende Liste gemäß Artikel 5 aufgenommen wird.“

muss es heißen:

„(2)   Nach Erstellung der in Artikel 8 Absatz 1 genannten Listen und wenn die zuständigen Behörden des Drittlandes ausreichende Garantien betreffend die Verwaltung und Überwachung der in ihre Zuständigkeit fallenden Erzeugungsgebiete geben, ist ein Kontrollbesuch der Kommission vor Ort vor der Aufnahme eines neuen Erzeugungsgebiets in eine bestehende Liste gemäß Artikel 5 nicht erforderlich.“

---
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Acting Assistant Secretary Lempert’s Trip to Tunisia and Libya

# 									Acting Assistant Secretary Lempert’s Trip to Tunisia and Libya							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

October 21, 2021

Acting Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Yael Lempert visited Tunisia and Libya October 19-21.  During her trip to Tunisia, Acting Assistant Secretary Lempert met with Tunisian government officials, including Foreign Minister Othman Jerandi, welcoming Tunisia’s newly formed government and reiterated that the U.S. looks forward to the establishment of a broadly inclusive process for a rapid return to constitutional order. She also discussed Libya and other regional issues. Acting Assistant Secretary Lempert also met withyoung Tunisian civil society representatives and women entrepreneurs who are playing a key role in Tunisia’s economic future.  

In Libya, accompanied by U.S. Special Envoy and Ambassador to Libya Richard Norland, Acting Assistant Secretary Lempert represented the United States at the Libya Stabilization Conference in Tripoli. She also participated in bilateral meetings with senior Libyan officials, including Prime Minister Dabaiba and Foreign Minister Mangoush, and a range of other foreign delegations to the conference, emphasizing the importance of Libya’s efforts to prepare for free and fair national elections in December, and U.S. support for the withdrawal of all foreign forces, fighters, and mercenaries from Libya.

Tags

Bureau of Near Eastern AffairsLibyaOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial International TravelTanzania

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
- Artemis Accords
- Remarks and Releases

HomeArtemis Accords...Artemis Accords – Remarks and Releases

# 						Artemis Accords – Remarks and Releases					

39 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year202420232022

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a SpeakerAntony J. BlinkenJennifer R. Littlejohn

Select a LocationAngolaArgentinaBahrainBelgiumBulgariaCzech RepublicEcuadorFranceGermanyGreeceIndiaJapanLithuaniaNetherlandsNigeriaPeruPhilippinesRomaniaRwandaSaudi ArabiaSingaporeSlovakiaSloveniaSouth KoreaSpainSwedenSwitzerlandUruguay

Select a Release TypeDipNoteDipNote: Climate and EnvironmentDipNote: Science, Technology, and InnovationFact SheetMedia NotePress StatementRemarks

Select a Bureau/OfficeBureau of African AffairsBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of Near Eastern AffairsBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsBureau of South and Central Asian AffairsBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsOffice of Diversity and InclusionOffice of Science and Technology CooperationOffice of Space AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

          -    Fact Sheet  		The United States and Angola: Partnering for Prosperity	  January 24, 2024 
          -    Media Note  		United States Welcomes the Republic of Angola’s Signature of the Artemis Accords	  December 4, 2023 
          -    Media Note  		United States Welcomes the Republic of Bulgaria to the Artemis Accords	  November 9, 2023 
          -    Media Note  		United States Welcomes the Kingdom of the Netherlands to the Artemis Accords	  November 7, 2023 
          -    Media Note  		United States Welcomes Germany’s Signing of the Artemis Accords	  September 15, 2023 
          -    Media Note  		Argentina Signs the Artemis Accords	  July 27, 2023 
          -    Media Note  		The Republic of India Signs the Artemis Accords	  June 24, 2023 
          -    Media Note  		The Republic of Ecuador Signs the Artemis Accords	  June 22, 2023 
          -    Media Note  		Kingdom of Spain Signs the Artemis Accords	  May 30, 2023 
          -    Press Statement  		United States Leads in Space with Diplomacy	  Antony J. BlinkenMay 30, 2023 

previous page1234next page

Back to Top
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 19 (Friday, January 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5648-5649]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-2034]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Availability for Non-Exclusive, Exclusive, or Partially Exclusive 
Licensing of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Concerning Treatment 
of the CNS for Status Epilepticus Due to Organophosphate Exposure

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Announcement is made of the availability for licensing of the 
invention set forth in U.S. Provisional Patent Application Serial No. 
61/104,311 entitled `` * * * Treatment of the CNS for Status 
Epilepticus Due to Organophosphate Exposure,'' filed October 10, 2008. 
The United States Government, as represented by the Secretary of the 
Army, has rights in this invention.

ADDRESSES: Commander, U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, 
ATTN: Command Judge Advocate, MCMR-JA, 504 Scott Street, Fort Detrick, 
Frederick, MD 21702-5012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For patent issues, Ms. Elizabeth 
Arwine, Patent Attorney, (301) 619-7808. For licensing issues, Dr. Paul 
Mele, Office of Research & Technology Assessment, (301) 619-6664, both 
at telefax (301) 619-5034.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The invention is a method of post exposure 
treatment for chemical warfare nerve agent or organophosphate induced 
seizure/status epilepticus and neuropathology. The method of treatment 
utilizes a specific blood-brain

[[Page 5649]]

barrier penetrating oxime. The administration of this oxime initiates 
the reactivation of the central nervous system cholinesterases (AChE 
and BChE) for pesticide and OP induced central nervous system (and 
peripherally) inhibited AChE.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
 [FR Doc. E9-2034 Filed 1-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-P
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 161 (Friday, August 21, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 42229]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20122]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: Bureau of Economic Analysis.
    Title: Quarterly Survey of Insurance Transactions by U.S. Insurance 
Companies with Foreign Persons.
    OMB Control Number: 0608-0066.
    Form Number(s): BE-45.
    Type of Request: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Burden Hours: 9,600.
    Number of Respondents: 1,200.
    Average Hours per Response: 8.
    Needs and Uses: The U.S. Government requires data from the BE-45, 
Quarterly Survey of Insurance Transactions by U.S. Insurance Companies 
with Foreign Persons, to obtain accurate and up-to-date information on 
transactions in reinsurance and other insurance transactions between 
U.S. insurance companies and foreign persons. The data collected will 
be used in monitoring U.S. exports and imports of insurance services; 
analyzing their impact on the U.S. and foreign economies; supporting 
U.S. international commercial policy on such services; compiling the 
international transactions; national income and product, and input-
output accounts of the United States; assessing U.S. competitiveness in 
international trade in services; and improving the ability of U.S. 
businesses to identify and evaluate market opportunities.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit organizations.
    Frequency: Quarterly.
    Respondents Obligation: Mandatory.
    Legal Authority: Title 22 U.S.C., sections 3101-3108, as amended.
    OMB Desk Officer: Paul Bugg, (202) 395-3093.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal may be obtained 
by writing Departmental Paperwork Clearance Officer, Diana Hynek, 
Department of Commerce, Room 7845, 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20230 or via the Internet at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ed89a594838886ad89828ec38a829b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="44200c3d2a212f04202b276a232b32">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Send comments on the proposed information collection within 30 days 
of publication of this notice to Paul Bugg, OMB Desk Officer, via e-
mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e29280978585a28d8f80cc878d92cc858d94"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2e5e4c5b49496e41434c004b415e00494158">[email protected]</span></a> or by fax at (202) 395-7245.

    Dated: August 18, 2009.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-20122 Filed 8-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-06-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 1010.950 Availability of information—general. ( a ) The Secretary has the discretion to disclose information reported under this chapter, other than information reported pursuant to § 1010.380, for any reason consistent with the purposes of the Bank Secrecy Act, including those set forth in paragraphs (b) through (d) of this section. FinCEN may disclose information reported pursuant to § 1010.380 only as set forth in § 1010.955, and paragraphs (b) through (f) of this section shall not apply to the disclosure of such information.
( b ) The Secretary may make any information set forth in any report received pursuant to this chapter available to another agency of the United States, to an agency of a state or local government or to an agency of a foreign government, upon the request of the head of such department or agency made in writing and stating the particular information desired, the criminal, tax or regulatory purpose for which the information is sought, and the official need for the information.
( c ) The Secretary may make any information set forth in any report received pursuant to this chapter available to the Congress, or any committee or subcommittee thereof, upon a written request stating the particular information desired, the criminal, tax or regulatory purpose for which the information is sought, and the official need for the information.
( d ) The Secretary may make any information set forth in any report received pursuant to this chapter available to any other department or agency of the United States that is a member of the Intelligence Community, as defined by Executive Order 12333 or any succeeding executive order, upon the request of the head of such department or agency made in writing and stating the particular information desired, the national security matter with which the information is sought and the official need therefor.
( e ) Any information made available under this section to other department or agencies of the United States, any state or local government, or any foreign government shall be received by them in confidence, and shall not be disclosed to any person except for official purposes relating to the investigation, proceeding or matter in connection with which the information is sought.
( f ) The Secretary may require that a State or local government department or agency requesting information under paragraph (b) of this section pay fees to reimburse the Department of the Treasury for costs incidental to such disclosure. The amount of such fees will be set in accordance with the statute on fees for government services, 31 U.S.C. 9701.
[75 FR 65812, Oct. 26, 2010, as amended at 88 FR 88808, Dec. 22, 2023]
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 306.111 Procedure for applying for relief. Prompt report of the loss, theft, destruction, mutilation or defacement of a security should be made to the Bureau. The report should include: ( a ) The name and present address of the owner and his address at the time the security was issued, and, if the report is made by some other person, the capacity in which he represents the owner.
( b ) The identity of the security by title of loan, issue date, interest rate, serial number and denomination, and in the case of a registered security, the exact form of inscription and a full description of any assignment, endorsement or other writing.
( c ) A full statement of the circumstances.
All available portions of a mutilated, defaced or partially destroyed security must also be submitted.
#### § 1010.312 Identification required.

Before concluding any transaction with respect to which a report is required under § 1010.311, § 1010.313, § 1020.315, § 1021.311 or § 1021.313 of this chapter, a financial institution shall verify and record the name and address of the individual presenting a transaction, as well as record the identity, account number, and the social security or taxpayer identification number, if any, of any person or entity on whose behalf such transaction is to be effected. Verification of the identity of an individual who indicates that he or she is an alien or is not a resident of the United States must be made by passport, alien identification card, or other official document evidencing nationality or residence (*e.g.,* a Provincial driver's license with indication of home address). Verification of identity in any other case shall be made by examination of a document, other than a bank signature card, that is normally acceptable within the banking community as a means of identification when cashing checks for nondepositors (*e.g.,* a driver's license or credit card). A bank signature card may be relied upon only if it was issued after documents establishing the identity of the individual were examined and notation of the specific information was made on the signature card. In each instance, the specific identifying information (*i.e.,* the account number of the credit card, the driver's license number, *etc.*) used in verifying the identity of the customer shall be recorded on the report, and the mere notation of “known customer” or “bank signature card on file” on the report is prohibited.
40022.

#### LOUDERMILK v. ASSOCIATES DISCOUNT CORPORATION.

Decided April 3, 1963.

Felton, Chief Judge.

1. A prima facie defense to a suit against a bankrupt on a debt existing at the time of filing the petition in bankruptcy is made out by the introduction in evidence of the order of discharge in bankruptcy, the burden being then cast upon the plaintiff to show, in such a case as this, that the debt was not scheduled, and that if it was not, he had no notice of the bankruptcy proceedings. *Bell v. Georgia Chemical Works,*33 Ga. App. 286 (125 SE 871); *Coppedge v. Aycock Mortgage &c. Corp.,*51 Ga. App. 248 (179 SE 909); *Coppedge v. Aycock Mortgage Acc. Corp.,*54 Ga. App. 437 (188 SE 311); *Tyler v. Jones County Bank,*78 Ga. App. 741 (1) (52 SE2d 547); *Beck & Gregg Hdw. Co. v. Crum,*127 Ga. 94 (56 SE 242); *Huff v. Porter,*89 Ga. App. 345 (79 SE2d 334).

2. Under the foregoing authorities it was error for the court to overrule the certiorari from the Civil Court of Fulton County for the reason that the debtor made out a prima facie defense against the plaintiff’s action and there was no evidence introduced by the plaintiff or defendant to the effect that the debt was not scheduled and that if it was not the plaintiff had no knowledge of the bankruptcy proceedings.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Eberhardt and Russell, JJ., concur.*

*575*Oze R. Horton,*for plaintiff in error.

*M. Alvin Levy,*contra.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 315.70 General rules governing entitlement. The following rules govern ownership or entitlement where one or both of the persons named on a bond have died without the bond having been surrendered for payment or reissue: ( a ) *Single owner bond.* If the owner of a bond registered in single ownership form has died, the bond becomes the property of that decedent's estate, and payment or reissue will be made as provided in this subpart.
( b ) *Coowner bond* — ( 1 ) *One coowner deceased.* If one of the coowners named on a bond has died, the surviving coowner will be recognized as its sole and absolute owner, and payment or reissue will be made as though the bond were registered in the name of the survivor alone. Any request for reissue by the surviving coowner must be supported by proof of death of the other coowner.
( 2 ) *Both coowners deceased.* If both coowners named on a bond have died, the bond becomes the property of the estate of the coowner who died last, and payment or reissue will be made as if the bond were registered in the name of the last deceased coowner alone. Proof of death of both coowners will be required to establish the order of death.
( 3 ) *Simultaneous death of both coowners.* If both coowners die under conditions where it cannot be established, either by presumption of law or otherwise, which coowner died first, the bond becomes the property of both equally, and payment or reissue will be made accordingly.
( c ) *Beneficiary bond* — ( 1 ) *Owner deceased.* If the owner of a bond registered in beneficiary form has died and is survived by the beneficiary, upon proof of death of the owner, the beneficiary will be recognized as the sole and absolute owner of the bond. Payment or reissue will be made as though the bond were registered in the survivor's name alone. A request for payment or reissue by the beneficiary must be supported by proof of death of the owner.
( 2 ) *Beneficiary deceased.* If the beneficiary's death occurs before, or simultaneous with, that of the registered owner, payment or reissue will be made as though the bond were registered in the owner's name alone. Proof of death of the owner and beneficiary is required to establish the order of death.
( d ) *Nonresident aliens.* If the person who becomes entitled to a bond because of the death of an owner is an alien who is a resident of an area with respect to which the Department of the Treasury restricts or regulates the delivery of checks drawn against funds of the United States or its agencies or instrumentalities, delivery of the redemption check will not be made so long as the restriction applies. See Department of the Treasury Circular No. 655, current revision (31 CFR part 211).