alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1349 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1349

 To authorize expenditures for fiscal year 1996 for the operation and 
        maintenance of the Panama Canal, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 1995

 Mr. Spence (for himself, Mr. Dellums, Mr. Bateman, and Mr. Taylor of 
Mississippi) (all by request) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on National Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize expenditures for fiscal year 1996 for the operation and 
        maintenance of the Panama Canal, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Panama Canal Commission 
Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 1996''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF EXPENDITURES.

    (a) Except as specified in subsection (b), the Panama Canal 
Commission is authorized to make such expenditures within the limits of 
funds and borrowing authority available to it in accordance with law, 
and to make such contracts and commitments, without regard to fiscal 
year limitations, and to be derived from the Panama Canal Commission 
Revolving Fund, as may be necessary under the Panama Canal Act of 1979 
(22 U.S.C. 3601), for the operation, maintenance, and improvement of 
the Panama Canal for fiscal year 1996.
    (b) For fiscal year 1996, the Panama Canal Commission is authorized 
to make expenditures from the Panama Canal Commission Revolving Fund 
for administrative expenses, not to exceed $50,741,000 (including not 
to exceed $11,000 for official reception and representation expenses of 
the Board; not to exceed $5,000 for official reception and 
representation expenses of the Secretary; and not to exceed $30,000 for 
official reception and representation expenses of the Administrator).
    (c) Funds available to the Panama Canal Commission shall be 
available for the purchase of not to exceed 38 passenger motor vehicles 
for replacement only (including large heavy-duty vehicles used to 
transport Commission personnel across the Isthmus of Panama), the 
purchase price of which shall not exceed $19,500 per vehicle.

SEC. 3. GENERAL PROVISIONS.

    Expenditures authorized under this Act may be made only in 
accordance with the Panama Canal Treaty of 1977 and related agreements, 
and any law of the United States implementing those agreements.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of TEPPCO Partners, L.P. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the “Report”), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Tracy E. Ohmart,
Acting Chief Financial Officer, Controller, Assistant Treasurer and Assistant
Secretary of Texas Eastern Products Pipeline Company, LLC, the general partner
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




1. The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2. The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the
Company.






/s/  TRACY
E. OHMART


Tracy E.
Ohmart


Acting
Chief Financial Officer, Controller, Assistant


Treasurer
and Assistant Secretary


Texas
Eastern Products Pipeline Company, LLC, General Partner




May 11,
2009






A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
TEPPCO Partners, L.P. and will be retained by TEPPCO Partners, L.P. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
February 13, 2017

Mr. Mark Baker

President and Chief Executive Officer

Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association

421 Aviation Way

Frederick, MD 21701

Mr. Jack Pelton

Chief Executive Officer & Chairman of the Board

Experimental Aircraft Association

3000 Poberezny Road

Oshkosh, WI 54902

Dear Mr. Baker and Mr. Pelton:

This is a response to your letter posted to the public docket on March 22, 2012, docket 

number FAA-2012-0350, petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf 

of the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) and the Experimental Aircraft 

Association (EAA) for an exemption from §§ 61.3 and 61.23 of Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow members represented by 

AOPA and EAA to operate aircraft recreationally without having to hold an FAA-issued 

medical certificate of any class under certain operational limitations and restrictions.

The Federal Aviation Administration Extension, Safety, and Security Act of 2016 (Public 

Law 114-190) (FESSA) was enacted on July 15, 2016. Section 2307 of the FESSA, Medical 

certification of certain small aircraft pilots, directed the FAA to issue or revise regulations to 

ensure that an individual may operate as pilot-in- command (PIC) of a covered aircraft if the 

pilot and aircraft meet certain prescribed conditions. The FAA was required to codify the 

relief in FESSA no later than 180 days. A copy of Public Law 114-190 is enclosed for your 

information.

On January 10, 2017, the FAA issued the Medical Certification of Small Aircraft Pilot 

(BasicMed) final rule (Docket No. FAA-2016-9157) allowing general aviation pilots to fly 

without holding an FAA medical certificate under certain circumstances outlined in Public 

Law 111-190. Effective May 1, 2017, those pilots may take advantage of the regulatory relief 
2

in the BasicMed rule or opt to continue to use their FAA medical certification. A copy of 

BasicMed is enclosed for your information.

Because the relief you seek is now covered under the new rule, we will take no further action 

on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Director, Flight Standards Service
|     |  |                                                                                                           |  |             
|---- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------
|     |  |                                                                                                           |  | Exhibit 35.6
|LOGO |  | Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1050-084, 8th Fl
401 South Tryon Street Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334 |  |             



ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2016, by and among DEUTSCHE
MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, WELLS FARGO BANK,
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series
2016-CD2 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 10.11 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify
that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such
period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2018.





LOGO

|                        
|------------------------
|Daniel
Bober            
|Executive Vice President
|Wells Fargo Bank        







|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6544

MICHAEL MCEVILY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GENE M. JOHNSON,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (2:03-cv-00135-HCM)

Submitted: July 20, 2006 Decided: July 27, 2006

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael McEvily, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen R. McCullough, Assistant

Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Michael McEvily seeks to appeal the district court’s

order treating his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as a successive 28

U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition, and dismissing it on that basis.

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000); Reid v. Angelone, 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that McEvily has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal.

Additionally, we construe McEvily’s notice of appeal and

informal brief as an application to file a second or successive

petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. United States v. Winestock, 340

F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003). In order to obtain authorization to

file a successive § 2254 petition, a prisoner must assert claims
- 3 -

based on either: (1) a new rule of constitutional law, previously

unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on

collateral review; or (2) newly discovered evidence, not previously

discoverable by due diligence, that would be sufficient to

establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for

constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found the

petitioner guilty of the offense. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2) (2000).

McEvily’s claims do not satisfy either of these criteria.

Therefore, we deny authorization to file a successive § 2254

petition.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
V

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1156

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade for the vessel BIG DAD.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 7, 1995

Mr. SHAW introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

BIG DAD.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

4 Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the Act of June 19, 1886

5 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 12106 of title 46,

6 United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may

7 issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate en-
2

•HR 1156 IH

1 dorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the

2 vessel BIG DAD (United States official number 565022).

Æ
# RECEIVED
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

### li.~9l1 

# 281

IN THE MATTER OF: ELITE AIR, INC. Respondent OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, D. C. 

# HIARING DOCKET

DOCKET NO. FAA-2011-1125 FAA CASE NO. 201080150236 Judge J.E. Sullivan

Draft Joint Section 13.217/Rule 26(f) Report Submitted by ComplainantFAA and Respondent Elite Air, Inc. 1. Pursuant to 14 C.P.R. § 13.217 and Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(£), a teleconference was held on February 15, 2012, and was attended by (I) Ryan Landers, counsel for Complainant, and (2) B. Gray Gibbs, counsel for Respondent. 2. The parties have discussed settlement, but have not reached a settlement. Settlement discussions will continuethrough the discoveryphase. 3. The parties will exchange the discovery disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1) by March 5, 2012. 4. The parties agree that initial discovery requests will be made by March 12, 2012. The parties will have until April 13, 2012, to respond to initial discoveryrequests. 5. The parties agree that follow-up discovery requests will be made byApril 24, 2012. The parties have until May 8, 2012, to respond to follow-up discovery requests. 6. Any objections to discovery requests must be made to the requesting party within two weeks ofthe discoveryrequest. 7. The parties agree that all dispositive motions mustbe filed byJune 8, 2012.8. The parties agree that a trial the week ofJuly 23, 2012. inthe Tampa, Florida area wonlei bebest for them. Respectively submitted this 17th day ofJanuary, 2012.
/) f:'/**~··-:"'" .~1/Y\**  /' r'**k<""~~'"** .**___.-;::;~~** 

# Rf<tll M. Landers Counsel for Complainant

Gray Gibbs Counsel for RespondentCERTIFICATE OF SERVICR I hereby certify that the foregoing Section 13.217/Rule 26(f) Report was sent as follows: original and one copyvia certifiedmail and Federal Express to: Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur WrightBuilding- Suite 2Wl000
one copyvia facsimile, certifiedmail, andFederal Express to: The Honorable J.E. Sullivan Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20, RoomE12-320 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE East Building Ground Floor Washington, DC 20590 facsimile: (202) 366-7536
one copyvia certified mail andregularmail to: B. Gray Gibbs, Esq. 100 Second Avenue South Suite 101-S St. Petersburg, FL 33701

Le a ssi ant Office ofthe Regional Counsel 

## FEB 1 ? i[ll? Dated
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Food and Nutrition Service

# AGENCY:

Food and Nutrition Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Department of Agriculture's Food and Nutrition Service published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         on August 7, 2009, concerning requests for comments on the Summer Food Service Program Claim for Reimbursement, Form FNS-143. The document contained an incorrect date.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mrs. Lynn Rodgers-Kuperman at (703) 305-2590.

## Correction

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of August 7, 2009, in FR/Vol. 74, No. 151 on page 39609, the second column, correct the “Expiration Date” caption to read: Expiration Date: January 31, 2010.                    

Dated: August 11, 2009.

Julia Paradis,

Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.

[FR Doc. E9-19766 Filed 8-17-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-30-P
§ 31.6302-2 Deposit rules for taxes under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act (RRTA). ( a ) *General rule.* Except as otherwise provided in this section, the rules of § 31.6302-1 determine the time and manner of making deposits of employee tax withheld under section 3202 and employer tax imposed under sections 3221 (a) and (b) attributable to payments made after December 31, 1992. Railroad retirement taxes described in section 3221(c) arising during the month must be deposited on or before the first date after the 15th day of the following month on which taxes are otherwise required to be deposited under § 31.6302-1.
( b ) *Separate application of deposit rules.* A person who accumulates tax under sections 3202 or 3221 shall not take that tax into account for purposes of determining when taxes described in paragraph (e) of § 31.6302-1 must otherwise be deposited.
( c ) *Modification of Monthly rule determination* — ( 1 ) *General rule.* Except as otherwise provided in this section, any person is allowed to use the Monthly rule of § 31.6302-1(c)(1) for an entire calendar year unless the amount of R.R.T.A. taxes required to be deposited under this section during the lookback period was more than $50,000. The lookback period is defined as the calendar year preceding the calendar year just ended. Thus, for purposes of determining if an R.R.T.A. employer qualifies to use the Monthly rule for calendar year 1993, a lookback must be made to calendar year 1991. New employers shall be treated as having employment tax liabilities of zero for any calendar year during which the employer did not exist.
( 2 ) *Exception.* An employer shall immediately cease to be allowed to use the Monthly rule after any day on which that employer is subject to the One-Day rule set forth in § 31.6302-1(c)(3). Such employer immediately becomes subject to the Semi-Weekly rule of § 31.6302-1(c)(2) for the remainder of the calendar year and the following calendar year.
( d ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section applies to deposits and payments made after December 31, 2010.
[T.D. 8436, 57 FR 44105, Sept. 24, 1992, as amended by T.D. 9507, 75 FR 75903, Dec. 7, 2010]
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.6103(l)(2)-1 Disclosure of returns and return information to Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation for purposes of research and studies. ( a ) *General rule.* Pursuant to the provisions of section 6103(l)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code and subject to the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section, officers and employees of the Internal Revenue Service may disclose returns and return information (as defined by section 6103(b)) to officers and employees of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation for purposes of, but only to the extent necessary in, conducting research and studies authorized by title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.
( b ) *Procedures and restrictions.* Disclosure of returns or return information by officers or employees of the Service as provided by paragraph (a) of this section will be made only upon written request to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue by the Executive Director of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation describing the returns or return information to be disclosed, the taxable period or date to which such returns or return information relates, and the purpose for which the returns or return information is needed in the administration of title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, and designating by title the officers and employees of such corporation to whom such disclosure is authorized. No such officer or employee to whom returns or return information is disclosed pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (a) shall disclose such returns or return information to any person, other than the taxpayer by whom the return was made or to whom the return information relates or other officers or employees of such corporation whose duties or responsibilities require such disclosure for a purpose described in paragraph (a), except in a form which cannot be associated with, or otherwise identify, directly or indirectly, a particular taxpayer.
(Secs. 6103 and 7805 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (90 Stat. 1667, 68A Stat. 917; 26 U.S.C. 6103 and 7805))
[T.D. 7723, 45 FR 65570, Oct. 3, 1980]
#### § 31.3306(b)(3)-1 Retirement payments.

The term “wages” does not include any payment made by an employer to an employee (including any amount paid by an employer for insurance or annuities, or into a fund, to provide for any such payment) on account of the employee's retirement. Thus payments made to an employee on account of his retirement are excluded from wages under this exception even though not made under a plan or system.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases…Announcement of Safe Mobility Office in Ecuador

# 											Announcement of Safe Mobility Office in Ecuador									

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

October 19, 2023

The United States is pleased to partner with Ecuador to establish Safe Mobility Offices (SMOs) in Ecuador. These offices, once fully operational in the coming weeks, will assist and guide migrants and refugees toward authorized channels of lawful migration.

This pioneering initiative, with offices already in operation in Colombia, Costa Rica, and Guatemala, streamlines access to lawful pathways to the United States and other countries, including expedited refugee processing and various humanitarian and employment opportunities. During its initial phase, Ecuador’s SMO services will prioritize Cuban, Haitian, Nicaraguan, Venezuelan, and Colombian nationals present in Ecuador as of October 18 and who qualify as asylum petitioners or have registered with Ecuador’s Ministry of Interior for a Certificate of Migratory Permanence.

For more information on the Safe Mobility initiative, please visit Movilidad Segura.

Tags

AsylumBureau of Population, Refugees, and MigrationBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsEcuadorImmigrationMigrationOffice of the Spokesperson

Back to Top