alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeThe Secretary of StateRemarks & Releases...Announcing the Fallon Smart Policy – Visa Restrictions on Foreign Government Officials Who Have Assisted Fugitives in Evading the U.S. Justice System

# 									Announcing the Fallon Smart Policy – Visa Restrictions on Foreign Government Officials Who Have Assisted Fugitives in Evading the U.S. Justice System							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

June 21, 2023

The Department of State is committed to deterring and promoting accountability for extraordinary foreign government involvement in aiding fugitives to evade the U.S. justice system.

Under Section 212(a)(3)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, I am announcing a new policy of visa restrictions on foreign government officials and agents who have intervened in a manner beyond the reasonable provision of consular services to assist fugitives accused or convicted of serious crimes to evade the U.S. justice system.  Such individuals are subject to the “Fallon Smart Policy.”  Immediate family members of such individuals may also be subject to this policy.

This policy is named in honor of Fallon Smart, a 15-year-old who was killed in a hit-and-run incident in 2016.  The foreign national accused of causing Fallon Smart’s death fled the United States to avoid being tried for manslaughter.

The visa restriction policy announced today is specific to foreign government officials and agents, and their immediate family members, as described above. The decision to impose visa restrictions reflects the commitment of the United States to support aspirations of fair judicial process and strengthen democracy and the rule of law.

Tags

Bureau of Consular AffairsHuman Rights and DemocracyOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
HomeBiographies...Julie Turner

# 				Julie Turner			

															Special Envoy on North Korean Human Rights Issues						Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs												

				October 13, 2023 -									Present							

Ambassador Julie Turner was sworn in as the U.S. Special Envoy for North Korean Human Rights Issues on October 13, 2023. Ambassador Turner is globally recognized an expert in the area of human rights and democracy and has worked over the past 20 years to strengthen democratic institutions and promote human rights throughout the East Asia and Pacific Region. Most recently, she served as the Office Director in the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor (DRL) Office of East Asia and the Pacific at the U.S. Department of State and previously was the Director for Southeast Asia at the National Security Council. During her time at the State Department, she served as the special assistant to the first U.S. Special Envoy for North Korean Human Rights and worked as a program analyst in the Bureau of Information Resource Management Office of eDiplomacy. As a career civil service employee and former Presidential Management Fellow, Ambassador Turner has dedicated her career to advancing human rights around the world. Ambassador Turner is a graduate of Pepperdine University and the University of Maryland.

Tags

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsState Department Official

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A25A0030. PATRICIA BECKFORD v. U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL

ASSOCIATION, AS OWNER TRUSTEE FOR RCF 2 ACQUSITION

TRUST.

Non-party Patricia Beckford moved in the trial court to intervene in this quiet

title action. The court denied the motion. Beckford filed a motion for reconsideration

and a motion to remove the case from the trial calendar. The court denied the motion

for reconsideration and found that Beckford did not have standing to seek a

continuance. Beckford appeals. We, however, lack jurisdiction.

Under OCGA§ 5-6-34 (a) (1), direct appeals generally may be taken from “[a]ll

final judgments, that is to say, where the case is no longer pending in the court

below[.]” Here, the record reflects that the case remains pending below. To obtain

immediate reviewofthe trial court’s order, therefore, Beckfordwas required to follow

the interlocutory appeal procedures set forth in OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), which include

obtaining a certificate ofimmediate reviewfromthe trial court.See Islamkhan v.Khan,

299 Ga. 548, 551 (2) (787 SE2d 731) (2016); see also Morman v. Bd. of Regents of the

Univ. System of Ga., 198 Ga. App. 544, 544 (402 SE2d 320) (1991) (“The denial of a

motion to intervene is not a final judgment and thus, is reviewable under the

interlocutory appeal procedure[s]” delineated in OCGA § 5-6-34 (b)). Beckford’s 

August 15, 2024
failure to follow those procedures deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which

is hereby DISMISSED.

1

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

1 Not only could Beckford have sought an interlocutory appeal under OCGA

§ 5-6-34 (b), the denial of her motion to intervene may be reviewable as part of the

timely review of a subsequent final judgment. See Davis v. Deutsche Bank Nat’l Trust

Co., 285 Ga. 22, 24 n. 1 (673 SE2d 221) (2009).

08/15/2024
HomeAntarctica Recent Actions...Antarctic Treaty – Annex V to Protocol on Environmental Protection – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Belarus, November 4, 2019

# 									Antarctic Treaty – Annex V to Protocol on Environmental Protection – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Belarus, November 4, 2019							

Office of Treaty Affairs

Download Attachment						 [89 KB]

Tags

Belarus

Back to Top
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 359.45 How are book-entry Series I savings bonds purchased and held?

Book-entry bonds must be purchased and held online through your New Treasury Direct account. We provide instructions for opening an account online at *http://www.fiscal.treasury.gov.*
WFLBP99L SON

NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION

“teu Ti An

et tn AAA EMEA dT, Se Se

NOS 16648-14M

PRICE 8200

NOS SEAMAP SERIES
NORTH PACIFIC OCEAN

rmorae of meemrates. it 6
US DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
WATIONAL GCEANIC ANO ATHCSPNERIC ADMONISTRATION
MATIONAL OSKAN SURVEY

1973

1s — fore vent Cami Contorma Conde Projection
= = ~— salu 1. 3,000,000
vo —— Nags Yate {Sitancand Patents 2° ad 93%
Appendix B 

MAPS OF ELBA EXPRESS PIPELINE, 

ABOVEGROUND FACILITIES, 

AND WAREHOUSE/STORAGE YARD LOCATIONS 
Non-Internet Public 

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE 

PROPOSED ELBA III PROJECT 

Docket Nos. CP06-470-000, CP06-471-000, CP06-472-000, 

CP06-473-000, and CP06-474-000 

APPENDIX B 

MAPS OF ELBA EXPRESS PIPELINE, 

ABOVEGROUND FACILITY, AND WAREHOUSE/STORAGE 

YARD LOCATIONS 

Pages 1-34 

Public access for the above information is available only 

through the Public Reference Room, or by e-mail at 

public.referenceroom@ferc.gov.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Fl  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Trust and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 28, 2016, byand among J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., as Depositor,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Servicer, Aegon USA Realty Advisors,LLC, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCertificate Administrator and Wilmington Trust, National Association, asTrustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series2016-HHV (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein nototherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 13.7 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.  A review of theactivities of the Servicer during the period from November 28, 2016 throughDecember 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per theAgreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2.  To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

3.  A statement that aregistered public accounting firm that is a member of the American Institute ofCertified Public Accountants has issued an attestation report on such ReportingServicer’s assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria asof and for such period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President 

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go  far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
124 STAT. 4130 PUBLIC LAW 111–379—JAN. 4, 2011 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 3592: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010): 

Dec. 16, considered and passed Senate. 

Dec. 17, 21, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–379 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 100 Commerce 

Drive in Tyrone, Georgia, as the ‘‘First Lieutenant Robert Wilson Collins Post 

Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. FIRST LIEUTENANT ROBERT WILSON COLLINS POST 

OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 100 Commerce Drive in Tyrone, Georgia, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘First Lieutenant Robert Wilson 

Collins Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘First Lieutenant Robert Wilson Collins Post Office Building’’. 

Approved January 4, 2011. 

Jan. 4, 2011 

[S. 3592] 


anorris on DSK5R6SHH1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### §§ 351.52-351.59 [Reserved]
#### Robert S. ORTLOFF, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John McCAIN; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-17130.

D.C. No. CV-00-00211-MHM(JRI).

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 10, 2002 *.

Decided June 17, 2002.

Before O’SCANNLAIN, BERZON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument and denies Ortloffs request for oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Arizona state prisoner Robert S. Ortloff appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing without leave to amend his action alleging that various state and federal officials violated his constitutional rights in connection with his criminal conviction, various civil actions and criminal investigations, and the denial of parole. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Resnick v. Hayes,*213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000), and may affirm on any basis fairly supported by the record, *Beezley v. Fremont Indem. Co.,*804 F.2d 530, 530 n. 1 (9th Cir.1986) (per curiam). We affirm.

We affirm the district court’s dismissal of Ortloffs amended claims pertaining to the 1984-85 investigation of a murder and arson for which he was never indicted, and a Texas state malpractice action and Arizona state wrongful death and conversion action, because those claims are time-barred. *See W. Ctr. for Journalism v. Cederquist,*235 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (applying state’s personal injury statute of limitation to *Bivens*claim); *TwoRivers v. Lewis,*174 F.3d 987, 991 (9th Cir.1999) (applying Arizona’s two-year personal injury statute of limitation to section 1983 claim).

The district court properly dismissed Ortloffs amended claim pertaining to his 1986 conviction for a mail bombing and 1988 conviction for possession of an unregistered firearm because success on those claims would necessarily imply the invalidity of his conviction for those crimes. *See Heck v. Humphrey,*512 U.S. 477, 486-87 n. 6, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994).

The district court properly dismissed Ortloffs amended claim pertaining to the denial of parole because “few things implicate the validity of continued confinement more directly than the allegedly improper denial of parole.” *Butterfield v. Bail,*120 F.3d 1023, 1024 (9th Cir.1997).

The district court properly dismissed Ortloffs amended claim concerning defendants’ filing of allegedly frivolous civil state court actions against him because such a claim is not cognizable under section 1983. *See Paskaly v. Seale,*506 F.2d 1209, 1212 (9th Cir.1974).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1454

BETTY L. LOVE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; MADELINE

O'BRIEN; ANTHONY SANCHEZ; CARY LEVANTHAL;

DUANE A. CEASAR; DEBBIE ANDERSON; PATRICIA D.

COLEMAN; MABLE E. MACKALL,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA96-3554-S)

Submitted: August 14, 1997 Decided: August 20, 1997

Before NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Betty L. Love, Appellant Pro Se. Allen F. Loucks, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing her

civil action for lack of jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P.

12(b)(1). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. To the extent Appellant

alleges a claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act, the district

court lacked jurisdiction because she failed to file an administrative claim with the appropriate federal agency. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 2675(a) (1994); Ahmed v. United States, 30 F.3d 514, 516 (4th

Cir. 1994) (requirement of filing an administrative claim is jurisdictional and may not be waived). To the extent Appellant alleges

a claim under the Federal Employees Compensation Act (FECA), the

district court lacked jurisdiction to review such claims. See 5

U.S.C. § 8128(b) (1994); Hanauer v. Reich, 82 F.3d 1304, 1307 (4th

Cir. 1996) (absent the agency exceeding its scope of authority,

judicial review of FECA claims is barred).

Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
§ 510.301 Arms or related materiel. The term *arms or related materiel* means arms or related materiel of all types, including any battle tanks, armored combat vehicles, large caliber artillery systems, combat aircraft, attack helicopters, warships, missiles or missile systems, or related materiel including spare parts. Note 1 to § 510.301 :
For additional guidance as to items that constitute *arms or related materiel,* please see determinations by the United Nations Security Council or its committee created pursuant to United Nations Security Council Resolution 1718, as well as designations by the Secretary of State of defense articles and defense services pursuant to the Arms Export Control Act and listed on the United States Munitions List (USML). In addition, items on the Commerce Control List as well as certain uncontrolled items that are subject to the Export Administration Act may be considered *related materiel.*
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Ambassador-at-Large for Global Women’s Issues Rao Gupta Travels to Seattle for the APEC Women and the Economy Forum

# 									Ambassador-at-Large for Global Women’s Issues Rao Gupta Travels to Seattle for the APEC Women and the Economy Forum							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

August 17, 2023

U.S. Ambassador-at-Large for Global Women’s Issues Dr. Geeta Rao Gupta will travel to Seattle August 17-20 to participate in the APEC Women and the Economy Forum (WEF) and related events during the Third APEC Senior Officials’ Meeting and Related Meetings (SOM3).  As part of the 2023 U.S. host year, the United States will host the WEF for the first time since former Secretary Clinton launched this annual forum in 2011.  Ambassador Rao Gupta will join the U.S. WEF Chair, Assistant to the President and Director of the White House Gender Policy Council Jennifer Klein, in multi-day WEF sessions focused on sustainability and inclusion, with four APEC WEF core themes:  1) the gender/climate nexus and building resilient communities; 2) digital inclusion and innovation; 3) the care economy; and 4) equity and equality in global value chains.

On August 18-19, Ambassador Rao Gupta will deliver remarks at WEF Policy Partner discussions on “Innovations in Care,” “Climate Change and Women’s Health,” and “Indigenous Women, Food Security, and Climate Change.”  On the margins of the WEF, the Ambassador will also engage in meetings with regional partners on bilateral efforts to advance women’s economic security, along with participating in the August 18 U.S.-Japan-Republic of Korea Trilateral Meeting on Women’s Economic Empowerment.

On August 20, following the High-Level Policy Dialogue on Women and the Economy (HLPDWE) led by U.S. WEF Chair Klein, Ambassador Rao Gupta will join U.S. Under Secretary of Commerce for International Trade Marisa Lago to co-chair the HLPDWE and Small & Medium Enterprises Ministerial Meeting (SMEMM) Joint Session.  Jointly organized by the U.S. Departments of State and Commerce, this meeting is the first-ever minister-level APEC ministerial meeting to highlight the role of women as entrepreneurs, innovators, and business owners.  Discussion topics will include expanding women-owned businesses’ access to global value chains, promoting entrepreneurship through e-commerce, and women innovators and creating climate resilience.  The Ambassador and Under Secretary Lago will later co-chair a Joint Gala to elevate women-owned, led, and managed small businesses.

For media inquiries, please contact stategwi@state.gov.

Tags

Asia-Pacific Economic CooperationBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of Economic and Business AffairsEconomic Prosperity and Trade PolicyJapanOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial Domestic TravelSouth KoreaWashingtonWomen's IssuesWomen’s Economic Empowerment

Back to Top
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.7214-1 Offenses by officers and employees of the United States.

Any officer or employee of the United States acting in connection with any revenue law of the United States required to make a written report under the provisions of section 7214(a)(8) shall submit such report to the Commissioner, or to a regional commissioner or district director.
§ 34.303 Application procedure—Direct Component. The entities identified in § 34.302 are eligible to apply for their allocation as a grant. Treasury has developed an application process for grants available under this subpart that is consistent with the Act and Federal laws and policies on grants. The application process includes the following requirements: ( a ) Before an eligible entity may receive a Direct Component activity grant, the grant applicant must submit a Multiyear Implementation Plan describing each activity for which it seeks funding under the Direct Component. Applications to fund preparation and amendment of the Multiyear Implementation Plan are exempt from this requirement.
( b ) For each activity, the Multiyear Implementation Plan must include a narrative description demonstrating: ( 1 ) The need for, purpose, and objectives of the activity;
( 2 ) How the activity is eligible for funding and meets all requirements;
( 3 ) Location of the activity;
( 4 ) Budget for the activity;
( 5 ) Milestones for the activity;
( 6 ) Projected completion dates for the activity;
( 7 ) Criteria the applicant will use to evaluate the success of each activity in helping to restore and protect the Gulf Coast Region impacted by the *Deepwater Horizon* oil spill;
( 8 ) The plan was made available for public review and comment for a minimum of 45 days in a manner calculated to obtain broad-based participation from individuals, businesses, Indian tribes, and non-profit organizations; and
( 9 ) Each activity in the plan was approved after consideration of meaningful input from the public. Treasury may require a standard format and additional information in the plans. Plans can be phased and incremental and may be modified later by the applicant. If the applicant has requested or anticipates requesting funding for any part of the activity from other sources, including other components in the Act, the applicant must identify the source, state the amount of funding, and provide the current status of the request. For the State of Louisiana parishes, the applicant must submit information demonstrating compliance with § 34.302(f).
( c ) Material modifications to a Multiyear Implementation Plan are subject to all applicable requirements in paragraph (b) of this section.
( d ) The applicant must include supporting information in each grant application that: ( 1 ) Proposed activities meet the statutory requirements for eligibility; and
( 2 ) Each activity designed to protect or restore natural resources is based on best available science.
( e ) An applicant may satisfy some or all of the requirements in this section and § 34.802(a) through (e) if it can demonstrate in its application to Treasury that before July 6, 2012: ( 1 ) The applicant established conditions to carry out activities that are substantively the same as the requirements in this section and § 34.802(a) through (e).
( 2 ) The applicable activity qualified as one or more of the eligible activities in § 34.201.