alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 515.579 Funds transfers for third-country official missions and certain intergovernmental organizations. ( a ) Depository institutions, as defined in § 515.333, are authorized to process funds transfers for the operating expenses or other official business in Cuba of third-country official missions or any intergovernmental organization in which the United States is a member or holds observer status.
( b ) Depository institutions, as defined in § 515.333, are authorized to process funds transfers and maintain accounts for the personal expenditures of the employees, grantees, and contractors, or persons who share a common dwelling as a family member of such employees, grantees, and contractors, of third-country official missions or any intergovernmental organization in which the United States is a member or holds observer status in Cuba.
[80 FR 2301, Jan. 16, 2015]
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 355.6 What happens if the presenting bank breaches its warranty?

If the presenting bank breaches its warranty, the payor Reserve Bank may either return the check to the presenting bank or send notice of the breach to the presenting bank. If the presenting bank does not make prompt restitution when it receives the returned check or notice of breach, we may begin appropriate collection procedures.
www.gpo.gov

### §3804. Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this chapter. Funds provided under this chapter are to be considered nonreimbursable.

(Pub. L. 103–302, §5, Aug. 23, 1994, 108 Stat. 1563.)
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
  /s/ Donald M. Earhart
 
 /s/ James R. Talevich
 
 Note:
    
    A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to I-Flow Corporation and will
be retained by I-Flow Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
HomeDiplomatic Security Service Memorial...Obaid  Ullah

# 				Obaid  Ullah			

				Local Law Enforcement			

Deceased				June 14, 2002			

**Please contact DS Public Affairs (dspublicaffairs@state.gov) if you have an image of this individual.**Back to DSS Memorial

Tags

Diplomatic Security Service MemorialPakistan

Back to Top
JUDGMENT

Court of Appeals 

 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-14-00311-CV

CHRISTINA BOB, Appellant

V.

CYPRESSWOOD COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, Appellee

Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3 of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 

1036047).

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on January 

6, 2014. After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly 

raised by the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment contains no reversible 

error. Accordingly, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that the appellant, Christina Bob, pay all appellate costs.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered May 28, 2015.

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland, and Massengale. Opinion delivered by Justice 

Bland.
_—~- PACIFIC OCEAN
UNITED STATES BATHYMETRIC MAP BUSHNELL KNOLL

fs 2 Pe we
cs | . RNS ES = yuh,

ie

= BUSHNELL KNOLL
NOS NH IT-1

Pedaed oo Wusrhagion, OC
US. GEPARTMENE OF COMMERCE
NARONAL OCEANIC AMD AIMOGRUERC aDAiNGTEATICN
NATIONAL OCEAN S88VECE
1985

AatMAlTR® COntoMe netbeval. 9 METS TO ManMUN Der

TRAnSNURSE AABCANCN MUCH
Seok (380.000 as
www.gpo.gov

### §§853 to 859. Repealed, Pub. L. 97–300, title I, §184(a)(1), Oct. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1357

Section 853, Pub. L. 93–203, title II, §231, as added Pub. L. 95–524, §2, Oct. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 1957, set out the Congressional statement of purpose for transitional employment opportunities for the economically disadvantaged.

Section 854, Pub. L. 93–203, title II, §232, as added Pub. L. 95–524, §2, Oct. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 1958, related to financial assistance to prime sponsors for transitional public service employment for economically disadvantaged persons who are unemployed.

Section 855, Pub. L. 93–203, title II, §233, as added Pub. L. 95–524, §2, Oct. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 1958; amended Pub. L. 96–583, §3(b), Dec. 23, 1980, 94 Stat. 3376, related to allocation of funds for carrying out of transitional employment opportunities for the economically disadvantaged.

Section 856, Pub. L. 93–203, title II, §234, as added Pub. L. 95–524, §2, Oct. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 1959, related to expenditure of funds by prime sponsors for purposes of transitional employment opportunities for economically disadvantaged.

Section 857, Pub. L. 93–203, title II, §235, as added Pub. L. 95–524, §2, Oct. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 1959, related to applicability of section 966 of this title to transitional employment opportunities for economically disadvantaged.

Section 858, Pub. L. 93–203, title II, §236, as added Pub. L. 95–524, §2, Oct. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 1959, related to eligibility for transitional employment opportunities for economically disadvantaged.

Section 859, Pub. L. 93–203, title II, §237, as added Pub. L. 95–524, §2, Oct. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 1960, related to payment of wages to economically disadvantaged individuals employed in transitional public service employment.

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Section 184(a) of Pub. L. 97–300 provided that the repeal of these sections is effective Oct. 13, 1982.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          32,376
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,255,654
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (139,949)
<INVENTORY>                                    295,356
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,747,273
<PP&E>                                         149,927
<DEPRECIATION>                                 254,136
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,161,710
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,785,588<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,394
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,325,573
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,161,710
<SALES>                                      1,461,797
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,572,411
<CGS>                                          662,704
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,420,493
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             119,585
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (849,682)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (848,082)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.050)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.050)
<FN>
<F1>Notes payable to stockholders of $922,359 are convertible to units of common
stock at the option of the noteholders over various dates through March 31,
1998.  On average 89% convert to stock.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
HomeBiographies...Barbara A. Leaf

# 				Barbara A. Leaf			

															Assistant Secretary						Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs												

				May 31, 2022 -									Present							

Barbara A. Leaf became Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs on May 31, 2022. Assistant Secretary Leaf previously served as Special Assistant to President Biden and the Senior Director for the Middle East and North Africa at the White House’s National Security Council (NSC).

Assistant Secretary Leaf served as the U.S. ambassador to the United Arab Emirates from 2014-2018 and was the Ruth and Sid Lapidus Fellow at The Washington Institute and director of the Beth and David Geduld Program on Arab Politics from 2018 until joining the Biden administration in January 2021. As former Senior Foreign Service Officer, Leaf served in high-level positions at the State Department and abroad. Before arriving in Abu Dhabi in 2014, she served as Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for the Arabian Peninsula and as Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Iraq; directed the U.S. Provincial Reconstruction Team in Basrah, Iraq; and served as the department’s first director of the Office of Iranian Affairs. In addition, she had postings in Rome, Sarajevo, Paris, Cairo, Tunis, Jerusalem, and Port-au-Prince.

A graduate of the College of William and Mary, she holds a master’s degree in foreign affairs from the University of Virginia. She speaks Arabic, French, Italian, and Serbo-Croatian.

Tags

Bureau of Near Eastern AffairsState Department Official

Back to Top
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 110 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 110

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow employers a tax 
                credit for hiring displaced homemakers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

Mr. Bilirakis introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow employers a tax 
                credit for hiring displaced homemakers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISPLACED HOMEMAKERS ESTABLISHED AS A TARGETED GROUP FOR 
              PURPOSES OF COMPUTING THE CREDIT FOR EMPLOYMENT OF 
              CERTAIN NEW EMPLOYEES.

    (a) General Rule.--Paragraph (1) of section 51(d) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to members of targeted groups) is 
amended by striking ``or'' at the end of subparagraph (I), by striking 
the period at the end of subparagraph (J) and inserting ``, or'', and 
by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(K) a displaced homemaker.''
    (b) Displaced Homemaker Defined.--Section 51(d) of such Code 
(relating to members of targeted groups) is amended by redesignating 
paragraphs (13), (14), (15), and (16) as paragraphs (14), (15), (16), 
and (17), respectively, and by adding after paragraph (12) the 
following new paragraph:
            ``(13) Displaced homemaker.--The term `displaced homemaker' 
        means an individual who--
                    ``(A) has not worked in the labor force for at 
                least 5 years but has, during those years, worked in 
                the home providing unpaid services for family members, 
                and
                    ``(B)(i) has been dependent on public assistance or 
                on the income of another family member but is no longer 
                supported by that income, or (ii) is receiving public 
                assistance on account of dependent children in the 
                home.''
    (c) Termination Not To Apply.--Paragraph (4) of section 51(c) of 
such Code (relating to termination) is amended by adding at the end 
thereof the following new sentence: ``The preceding sentence shall not 
apply in the case of any displaced homemaker.''
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to amounts paid or incurred after the date of enactment of this 
Act to individuals who begin work for the employer after such date.
                                 <all>
```
Amendment Number One to the Founding Investor Rights Agreement



 Exhibit 10.14 

AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE 
 TO THE 
 FOUNDING INVESTOR RIGHTS AGREEMENT 

This Amendment Number One (the “Amendment”) to the Founding Investor Rights Agreement dated January 1,
2009 (the “Investor Rights Agreement”) is entered into as of the 7th day of June, 2010 (the “Effective Date”) by and among ALNYLAM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., a Delaware corporation, with
its principal place of business at 300 Third Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142 (“Alnylam”), ISIS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., a Delaware corporation, with its principal place of business at 1896 Rutherford
Road, Carlsbad, California 92008 (“Isis”, and each of Alnylam and Isis, a “Licensor” and together, the “Licensors”), and REGULUS THERAPEUTICS INC. (formerly Regulus
Therapeutics LLC), a Delaware corporation, with its principal place of business at 1896 Rutherford Road, Carlsbad, California 92008 (“Regulus”). 
 RECITALS 
 WHEREAS, Regulus, Isis and Alnylam entered
into the Investor Rights Agreement; 
 WHEREAS, Isis, Alnylam, and Regulus now desire to amend the Investor Rights
Agreement as provided herein. 
 AGREEMENT 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt
and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Isis, Alnylam and Regulus each agrees as follows: 
 1. DEFINITIONS

 Capitalized terms used herein and not defined elsewhere herein have the meanings set forth in the Investor Rights Agreement.

 2. DELETION OF BUY-OUT PROVISION 
 2.1 Elimination of Buy-Out Provision. Section 4 of the Investor Rights Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: “[Deliberately Omitted]”

 2.2 Elimination of Exhibit D. Exhibit D of the Investor Rights Agreement shall be deleted in its
entirety and replaced with the following: “[Deliberately Omitted]” 







 3. MISCELLANEOUS 
 3.1 Other Terms. All other terms and conditions of the Investor Rights Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 

3.2 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which will be deemed an
original, and all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument. 
 [Remainder of Page Intentionally Left
Blank] 

  
 2 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereby execute this Amendment Number One to the Founding
Investor Rights Agreement as of the Effective Date. 
  

			
	ALNYLAM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Barry Greene
		 	Name: Barry Greene
		 	Title: President and Chief Operating Officer
	
	ISIS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ B. Lynne Parshall
		 	Name: B. Lynne Parshall
		 	Title: Chief Operating Officer and CFO
	
	REGULUS THERAPEUTICS INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Kleanthis G. Xanthopoulos
		 	Name: Kleanthis G. Xanthopoulos, Ph.D.
		 	Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
ex10-2.htm


Exhibit 10.2


 


CONTINGENT ADDENDUM TO LEASE AGREEMENT



 


ADDENDUM TO LEASE DATED 16 OF DECEMBER, 2010, BETWEEN HENRY AMALGAMATED LLC, (LESSOR)  ANGIE’S LIST, INC., (LESSEE), And DATED MARCH 1, 2009 (LEASE AGREEMENT) IS MADE AND ENTERED INTO AS OF DECEMBER 15, 2010.


 


WHEREAS, Lessor and Lessee entered into the lease agreement dated March 1, 2009 for office space.


 


NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed that the Lease Agreement is hereby modified and amended in the following respects to be effective April 1, 2012. WIT:


 



	  	
1.

	
Paragraph (1) (Description of Premises) Lessor hereby leases additional space known as the following to the lessee:  25 Pine Street Indianapolis IN 46202













	  	
2.

	
Paragraph (4) (Rent) The amount for the additional twenty-three parking spaces will be $1,311.00 a month.







 


Except as specifically mentioned herein, all other terms and conditions of the original Lease Agreement shall remain the same and unchanged


 


Henry Amalgamated LLC


Lessor



	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  
	
/s/ Karl Northern

	  	  	  	
Date:

	  	
4/10/2012







 


Angie’s List, Inc


Lessee



	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  
	
/s/ Robert R. Millard

	  	  	  	
Date:

	  	
4/10/2012
Order entered September 3, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00418-CR

No. 05-14-00419-CR

DIANA FLORES PEINADO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F10-25782-L, F12-00406-L

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeals.

On August 6, 2014, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant’s 

brief has not been filed. We ADOPT the findings that: (1) appellant desires to pursue the 

appeals; (2) appellant is indigent and represented by court-appointed counsel Jeffery Buchwald; 

(3) Mr. Buchwald’s explanation for the delay in filing appellant’s brief is his workload and 

family medical issues; and (4) Mr. Buchwald requested a sixty day extension of time from the 

August 28, 2014 hearing to file appellant’s brief.

We ORDER appellant to file his brief by OCTOBER 27, 2014. Due to the length of the 

extension and the fact that appellant’s brief is already two months overdue, no further extensions 
will be granted. If the brief is not filed by the date specified, we will order Jeffrey Buchwald 

removed as appellant’s counsel and will order the trial court to appoint new counsel to represent 

appellant in these appeals.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the 

Honorable Carter Thompson, Presiding Judge, Criminal District Court No. 5; and to counsel for 

all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
HomeBiographies...Brett M. Holmgren

# 				Brett M. Holmgren			

															Assistant Secretary						Bureau of Intelligence and Research												

				September 15, 2021 -									Present							

Brett M. Holmgren was sworn in as Assistant Secretary of State for Intelligence and Research on September 15, 2021.

Prior to assuming this position as Assistant Secretary, Mr. Holmgren served for 14 years in key leadership positions in the Intelligence Community (IC), the White House and at the Department of Defense, as well as three years in the private sector.

During the Obama administration, Mr. Holmgren served on the National Security Council staff as Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director for Intelligence Programs, Senior Policy Advisor to the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism, and Director for Counterterrorism. At the Department of Defense, he served as Special Assistant to the Deputy Secretary of Defense, where he was responsible for the intelligence, cybersecurity, technology and special operations portfolios.

Mr. Holmgren also served for eight years in the IC as a senior analyst at the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and, prior to that, as a counterterrorism analyst at the Defense Intelligence Agency. As an analyst, he deployed to warzones to provide support to counterterrorism operations.

Mr. Holmgren most recently served as Deputy for Nominations on the Biden-Harris Transition Team, and prior to that as Vice President for Technology Risk Management at Capital One Financial from 2017 to 2020.

Mr. Holmgren is the recipient of multiple honors and awards, including the Director of National Intelligence Superior Service Award, the CIA Director’s Award, the CIA Hostile Action Service Medal, and the Secretary of Defense Meritorious Civilian Service Award. He holds a B.A. in political science and journalism from the University of Wisconsin-Madison and a M.A. in global security studies, summa cum laude, from the Johns Hopkins University.

Tags

Bureau of Intelligence and ResearchState Department Official

Back to Top
#### Juan Ramón Ruberté, et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, *v.*The American Railroad Company, Defendant and Appellee.

No. 6846.

Argued November 1, 1937.

Decided November 30, 1937.

*361
      *Fernando B. Fornaris, B. Hernández Matos*and *E. Huertas Zayas*for appellants; *Mariano Acosta Velarde*for appellee.

Mr. Justice Wolf

delivered the opinion of the Court.

We adhere to onr conclusion that the rights of travellers .on the highroad are superior to those of a railway automobile when the tracks are out of use by reason of the season of the year and no crops are moving. Cases of accidents at ordinary intersections of highroads do not apply. Indeed, the duties of the driver of a railway automobile under the conditions seems to us analogous to those of a pedestrian or traveller approaching a used railway track when there would arise in such driver a duty to stop, look and listen.

The defendant insists that the holding of this court, on the matter of negligence, is a variance from the averments of the complaint. Defendant maintains that where specific averments are made, the proof should be limited to such averments and that the opinion of this court was based on a distinct ground. The most pertinent matter was that the complaint charged the defendant with running at high speed and our opinion was not based on that ground or any specified in the complaint, but on another. Perhaps any action taking the railway automobile into part of the crossing is moving too fast but we base our holding on other grounds. In our rendered opinion all the facts on which the railway company relied were considered. The latter does not deny but affirms that it stopped just on penetrating the highway. This is admitted. So that the pleadings may be considered as amended to cover our point of view, clearly before the court, *362that the railway automobile had under the conditions no right to enter on the highroad. That the pleadings may be considered as amended is the basis of various decisions of this court. See: *F. Gavilán & Co.*v. *Garriga e Hijos,*38 P.R.R. 372; *Frangui*v. *Fuertes Hnos.*41 P.R.R. 221, and others.

We did not base our reversal, as the appellee assumed, solely on a duty of said company to send someone ahead, but the ground of our decision was the duty of defendant to take some precaution on crossing the highroad.

We still hold that the act of the driver of the Graham Paige truck was one in emergency and the action of defendant was the proximate cause of the accident. We find no negligence in the driver of that truck.

With respect to the driver of the Ford truck we might have some doubts, but such doubts would only affect his supposed contributory negligence. The negligence of defendant would still justify the driver of the Graham Paige truck in taking the course he did.

We consider the other questions sufficiently discussed in our main opinion and the motion for reconsideration should be denied.

Mr. Justice Córdova Dávila took no part in the decision of this case.
HomeDiplomatic Security Service Memorial...Esmaeel Ali Ahmed  Al-Ansi

# 				Esmaeel Ali Ahmed  Al-Ansi			

				Local Law Enforcement			

Deceased				September 17, 2008			

**Yemeni Government image**

Tags

Diplomatic Security Service MemorialYemen

Back to Top
#### § 25.406 Savings clause.

Nothing in this rule is intended to authorize any person or entity to engage in any activity not otherwise authorized or permitted for such person or entity under any applicable laws of the United States, any territory or possession of the United States, any State, or the District of Columbia.