alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Assignment of Rudolph Marklin *et al.*to William P. Wilder for the Benefit of Creditors.

[Special Term.]

(Decided February, 1883.)

Where an assignee for the benefit of creditors carries on the former business of the assignor, and it does not appear that such continuance was a benefit to the estate, he will not be allowed the expenses thereby incurred.

Payments made by the assignee in such case as wages for work done both before and after the assignment, will not be allowed him without proper vouchers, although made to persons who could not write, and in a business where it was not customary to give or take receipts therefor. Nor can the portions of such payments made on account of preferences in the assignment be allowed, where the amounts paid thereon are not shown in the account.

Application to confirm the report of a referee upon an accounting by an assignee under a general assignment for the benefit of creditors.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

Van Brunt, J.

It is apparent from an examination of the evidence in this case, that the assignee, in conducting the business, did so for the purpose of enabling the assignors to make a compromise with their creditors, rather than because such continuance would be of advantage or benefit to the estate.

There is no evidence in this case that such continuance was an advantage or benefit to the estate. The amounts disbursed for such continuance were greater than the amounts received ; consequently, the business was conducted at a loss. What amount of merchandise was consumed in the carrying on of the business, does not appear, and under these circumstances, the assignee must be chargeable with the expenses incurred during the carrying on of such business.

It further appears that no proper vouchers have been fur*123nished by the assignee for a large number of the payments made by him.

It is claimed that the payments made for wages due both before and after the assignment were made to persons, some of whom could not write, and in the course of business it was not customary to give or take receipts therefor. This is no excuse to the assignee. There is nothing shown upon the account as to what was paid as a preference and what was paid for work done subsequent to the assignment. These items in this state of the account must necessarily be disallowed.

If the assignee thinks that he can furnish competent proof of these items, separating those which are claimed to be on account of the preference contained in the assignment, from those which were made on account of work done subsequent to the assignment, he may have an order referring the case back to the referee for the purpose of taking such proof: the expense of such additional reference, however, to be a personal charge as against the said assignee, and not a charge as against the estate. Unless such reference back is made, the objections to those items of the account for which no sufficient vouchers have been furnished, are sustained, as well as the objection to those items of the account which appear to have been incurred in the continuance of the business.

Order accordingly.
- Executive Secretariat Home
- About Us
- Leadership

HomeExecutive Secretariat...About Us – Executive Secretariat

# 									About Us – Executive Secretariat							

Executive Secretariat

The Executive Secretariat (S/ES), comprised of the Executive Secretary, four Deputy Executive Secretaries, and their staff, is responsible for coordination of the work of the Department internally, serving as the liaison between the Department’s bureaus and the offices of the Secretary, Deputy Secretary, and Under Secretaries. It also handles the Department’s relations with the White House, National Security Council, and other Cabinet agencies.

The Secretariat Staff (S/ES-S) partners with the various offices of the Department to task, track, edit, and review policy memoranda and briefing materials for the Secretary, Deputy Secretary, Under Secretary for Political Affairs, and Counselor.  The S/ES-S Records Division coordinates and substantively reviews written materials submitted by all Department bureaus and offices for the attention of the other Department Principals and maintains the Department’s official historical records and processes of FOIA requests for information from the Secretary, Deputy Secretary, Under Secretary for Political Affairs, and the Counselor. S/ES-S staff also is responsible for advancing the Secretary’s official trips — domestic and international — by managing the Secretary’s travel schedule and arranging the run-of-show and logistics for Secretary visits.

The Operations Center (S/ES-O) is the Secretary’s and the Department’s communications and crisis management center. Working 24 hours a day, the Operations Center monitors world events, prepares briefings for the Secretary and other Department principals, and facilitates communication between the Department and the rest of the world. The Operations Center also coordinates the Department’s response to crises and supports task forces, monitoring groups, and other crisis-related activities.

The S/ES Executive Technology (ExecTech) strives to digitally advance diplomacy by driving the exchange of knowledge and communication through transformative  information technology (IT) solutions. ExecTech supports the DoS senior leadership,  the Executive Secretariat, and other offices under the administrative umbrella of S/ES. We provide round-the-clock IT and communications services with outstanding customer service rooted in a boutique approach to meet the unique needs of the “7th floor.”

Back to Top
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 5, 2014

No. 04-14-00348-CR

Jacob KLEIN,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR2866

Honorable Pat Priest, Judge Presiding

ORDER

 Appellant’s brief is currently due August 11, 2014. On August 1, 2014, appellant filed a 

second motion to extend time to file his brief, asking for an extension of thirty days. We 

GRANT appellant’s motion. Accordingly, appellant’s brief is due on or before September 10, 

2014.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 5th day of August, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE
  (1)  The undersigned has caused a review of the activities of the Company, in its capacity as Servicer, during the period March 28, 2017 through March 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 28, 2017 (the “Agreement”), by and among the Company, individually and as servicer, Nissan Auto Receivables Corporation II, as seller, and Nissan Auto Receivables 2017-A Owner Trust, to be conducted under his supervision; and
 (2)  To the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
  rd
 /s/ Mark KaczynskiMark KaczynskiPresident and Chief Executive Officer
 22
HomeBiographies...Francisco O. Mora

# 				Francisco O. Mora			

															U.S. Ambassador to the Organization of American States						Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs												

				December 30, 2022 -									Present							

Tags

Bureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsState Department Official

Back to Top
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Motor vehicle use map. PayetteNational Forest, Idaho**
 
2012:Front | Back
2013:Front | Back
2015:Front | Back
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.28:P 29/30/
Item Number:0080-G (online)
CGP systemNumber:000926456
 
January 10, 2018
Home2001 Treaties and Agreements...Belarus (01-1221) – Foreign Assistance

# 									Belarus (01-1221) – Foreign Assistance							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

December 21, 2001

Foreign Assistance

Agreement signed at Minsk July 18, 1996; entered into force provisionally July 18, 1996, definitively December 21, 2001.
Download Agreement						 [4 MB]

Tags

BelarusTreaties

Back to Top
#### Kevin Glassman, Respondent, v ProHealth Ambulatory Surgery Center, Inc., et al., Appellants.

[806 NYS2d 648]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of an employment contract, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Warshawsky, J.), entered February 5, 2004, as denied those branches of their motion which were for leave to amend the answer to include counterclaims, among other things, to recover damages for breach of the employment contract, conversion, money had and received, unjust enrichment, and fraud, and to add a claim for punitive damages, and (2) an order of the same court entered May 26, 2004, as, upon reargument, adhered to the prior determination.

Ordered that the appeal from the order entered February 5, 2004, is dismissed, as the portions of the order appealed from were superseded by the order entered May 26, 2004, made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order entered May 26, 2004, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the plaintiff.

*523While leave to amend an answer to include a counterclaim should be liberally granted *(see*CPLR 3025 [b]), such leave should be denied where, as was the case with several of the proposed counterclaims here, the counterclaim is “palpably insufficient as a matter of law or is totally devoid of merit” *(Hartford Cas. Ins. Co. v Vengroff Williams & Assoc.,*306 AD2d 435, 436 [2003]). Indeed, while the defendants sought permission to assert a counterclaim to recover damages for the plaintiff’s alleged breach of a provision in the employment agreement which, in essence, provided that the plaintiff, an anesthesiologist, turn over to the defendant ProHealth Ambulatory Surgery Center, Inc. (hereinafter ProHealth ASC), fees earned for anesthesiology services that were performed outside of its ambulatory surgical center, such a provision is illegal and unenforceable. It enables ProHealth ASC, which was only authorized to provide certain medical services at its center *(see*10 NYCRR 401.2 [b]), to obtain fees for medical services that it was never authorized to provide *(see Accident Claims Determination Corp. v Durst,*224 AD2d 343 [1996]; *cf.*Education Law § 6512 [1]; *Schorr v Bernarr Macfadden Found.,*5 AD2d 151 [1958]; *Accetta v Zupa,*54 App Div 33 [1900]). Moreover, since some of the other proposed counterclaims were duplicative of this proposed counterclaim *(see Hynes v Griebel,*300 AD2d 628 [2002]; *Hassett-Belfer Senior Hous. v Town of N. Hempstead,*270 AD2d 306 [2000]), they are likewise palpably insufficient as a matter of law or totally devoid of merit *(see Hartford Cas. Ins. Co. v Vengroff Williams & Assoc., supra*at 436).

The defendants’ remaining contentions are either without merit or do not require reversal. H. Miller, J.P., Luciano, Dillon and Covello, JJ., concur.
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by T.D. 9359, 72 FR 54544, Sept. 26, 2007.

§ 10.69 Representation; ex parte communication. ( a ) *Representation.* ( 1 ) The Internal Revenue Service may be represented in proceedings under this part by an attorney or other employee of the Internal Revenue Service. An attorney or an employee of the Internal Revenue Service representing the Internal Revenue Service in a proceeding under this part may sign the complaint or any document required to be filed in the proceeding on behalf of the Internal Revenue Service.
( 2 ) A respondent may appear in person, be represented by a practitioner, or be represented by an attorney who has not filed a declaration with the Internal Revenue Service pursuant to § 10.3. A practitioner or an attorney representing a respondent or proposed respondent may sign the answer or any document required to be filed in the proceeding on behalf of the respondent.
( b ) *Ex parte communication.* The Internal Revenue Service, the respondent, and any representatives of either party, may not attempt to initiate or participate in ex parte discussions concerning a proceeding or potential proceeding with the Administrative Law Judge (or any person who is likely to advise the Administrative Law Judge on a ruling or decision) in the proceeding before or during the pendency of the proceeding. Any memorandum, letter or other communication concerning the merits of the proceeding, addressed to the Administrative Law Judge, by or on behalf of any party shall be regarded as an argument in the proceeding and shall be served on the other party.
( c ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section is applicable beginning August 2, 2011.
[T.D. 9527, 76 FR 32310, June 3, 2011, as amended by 76 FR 49650, Aug. 11, 2011]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       3,586,732
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,190,537
<ALLOWANCES>                                    71,193
<INVENTORY>                                  5,630,776
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,271,667
<PP&E>                                       5,597,780
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,288,217
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,402,977
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,824,810
<BONDS>                                        301,301
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       180,338
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,096,528
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,402,977
<SALES>                                     13,464,482
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,464,482
<CGS>                                        9,833,182
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,833,182
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,454,404
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                52,823
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             108,102
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (857,358)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (857,358)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (857,358)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)


</TABLE>
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 03235**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket** **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 03235\03235_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03235\03235_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 03235\03235_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 03235\03235_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03235\03235_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03235\03235_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03235\03235_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03235\03235_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03235\03235_Part F.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03235\03235_Part G.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03235\03235_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

03235\Certification Statement Plant ID 03235.pdf Plant certification statement x 03235\Supplemental Documents\03235_Part_A-0_Final_CGS.pdf Plant submitted survey file 

### x 03235\Supplemental Documents\03235_Part_A-1_CGS_Map-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 03235\Supplemental Documents\03235_Part_A-2_CGS_ Water_ Balance_ Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03235\Supplemental Documents\03235_Part_B_Final_CGS.pdf Plant submitted survey file x 03235\Supplemental Documents\03235_Part_C-0_Final_CGS.pdf Plant submitted survey file

03235\Supplemental Documents\03235_Part_C_Q C2-31 - CGS3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 03235\Supplemental Documents\03235_Part_C_Q C2-31 - CGS4.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03235\Supplemental Documents\03235_Part_D-0_Final_CGS.pdf Plant submitted survey file x 03235\Supplemental Documents\03235_Part_D-1_CGS_ Pond_System_ Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03235\Supplemental Documents\03235_Part_D-2_CGS_WWT_System_ Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03235\Supplemental Documents\03235_Part_E_Final_CGS.pdf Plant submitted survey file x 03235\Supplemental Documents\03235_Part_F-0_Final_CGS.pdf Plant submitted survey file x 03235\Supplemental Documents\03235_Part_F-1_CGS NPDES and POZ Wellsymbols.jpg Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03235\Supplemental Documents\03235_Part_F-2_CGS NPDES and POZ Wellsymbols.pdf.jpg Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03235\Supplemental Documents\03235_Part_G_Final_CGS.pdf Plant submitted survey file x 03235\Supplemental Documents\03235_Part_H_Final_CGS.pdf Plant submitted survey file x 03235\Supplemental Documents\Part_C-1_CGS_Map-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in theSteam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Schedule of Director Annual Fees



 EXHIBIT 10.33 
 SUMMARY SCHEDULE OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION 
 Directors of Placer Sierra Bancshares (except management directors)
receive annual fees for service on the Board and a Chairman fee as follows: 
  

			
	 Annual Retainer
	 	$60,000
		
	 Fee for Chairman of the Board
	 	$1,500 per month

 Each of the directors are also eligible to participate in the PLSB 2002 Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan and
may also participate in health care plans.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

###### Editorial Note on Part 353

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 353 appear at 79 FR 8859, Feb. 14, 2014.

#### § 353.38 Payment during lifetime of owner of beneficiary bond.

A savings bond registered in beneficiary form will be paid to the registered owner during his or her lifetime upon surrender with an appropriate request. Upon payment (as determined in § 353.43) the beneficiary will cease to have any interest in the bond.
§ 23.44 Investigation. ( a ) *Informal investigation.* ( 1 ) Treasury will investigate complaints that are unresolved after mediation or are reopened because of a violation of a mediation agreement.
( 2 ) As part of the initial investigation, Treasury will use informal fact finding methods, including joint or separate discussions with the complainant and recipient, to establish the facts and, if possible, settle the complaint on terms that are mutually agreeable to the parties. Treasury may seek the assistance of any involved State agency.
( 3 ) Any settlement agreement will be put in writing and the parties will sign it.
( 4 ) The settlement shall not affect the operation of any other enforcement effort of Treasury, including compliance reviews and investigation of other complaints that may involve the recipient.
( 5 ) The settlement is not a finding of discrimination against a recipient.
( b ) *Formal investigation.* If Treasury cannot resolve the complaint through informal investigation, it will begin to develop formal findings through further investigation of the complaint. If the investigation indicates a violation of these regulations, Treasury will attempt to obtain voluntary compliance. If Treasury cannot obtain voluntary compliance, it will begin enforcement as described in § 23.46
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Assistant Secretary Holmgren’s Travel to Seattle

# 									Assistant Secretary Holmgren’s Travel to Seattle							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

April 14, 2023

From April 17-18, Assistant Secretary of State for Intelligence and Research (INR) Brett Holmgren will travel to Seattle, Washington.  He will deliver remarks on INR’s mission at the Henry M. Jackson School of International Studies at the University of Washington and will participate in recruitment activities, meeting with faculty and students to highlight the opportunities and rewards of public service careers in intelligence and foreign affairs.  While in the Seattle area, Assistant Secretary Holmgren will also meet with U.S. military counterparts to engage on collaborative support to diplomacy.

More information on U.S. Department of State careers is available at careers.state.gov.

For press inquiries, contact INRPublicAffairs@state.gov.

Tags

Bureau of Intelligence and ResearchOffice of Public LiaisonOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial Domestic TravelWashington

Back to Top