alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Assistant Secretary Stewart Travels to the United Kingdom

# 									Assistant Secretary Stewart Travels to the United Kingdom							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

December 8, 2023

Assistant Secretary of State for Arms Control, Deterrence, and Stability Mallory Stewart will travel to the United Kingdom December 11-15 to meet with counterparts based in London, Paris, and Geneva on a range of multilateral nuclear affairs issues.  For the remainder of the week, she will participate in discussions on risk reduction, nonproliferation, and arms control at Wilton Park.

Tags

Arms ControlArms Control and NonproliferationBureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and StabilityBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsNuclear NonproliferationOffice of the SpokespersonTravelUnited Kingdom

Back to Top
#### In the Matter of Erik M. and Another, Infants. Oneida County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Gerald M., Appellant.

[804 NYS2d 884]

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oneida County (John E. Flemma, J.H.O.), entered April 23, 2003 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10. The order adjudged the subject children to be neglected children as defined in Family Court Act § 1012 (f) (i) (A).

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the petition is dismissed.

Memorandum: On appeal from an order finding that he had neglected his children, respondent father contends that the evidence concerning the conditions of his residence was insufficient to establish neglect under Family Court Act § 1012 (f) (i) (A) *1057and that Family Court’s finding is against the weight of the evidence. We agree. This is not a case in which the conditions of respondent’s residence were “deplorable and unsanitary” (Matter *of Todd D.,*9 AD3d 462, 463 [2004]; *see Matter of Jessica DiB.,*6 AD3d 533, 534 [2004]). Rather, although respondent’s residence was in a state of disarray and was generally messy, there was no evidence of unsanitary or unsafe conditions warranting a finding of neglect *(cf. Jessica DiB.,*6 AD3d at 534; *Matter of Shavon H.,*1 AD3d 123 [2003]; *Matter of Mariah CC.,*302 AD2d 799, 801 [2003]; *Matter of Noemi B.,*273 AD2d 304 [2000]; *Matter of Lillian H.,*254 AD2d 237 [1998]; *Matter of Kathleen GG. v Kenneth II.,*254 AD2d 538, 539-540 [1998]; *Matter of Billy Jean II.,*226 AD2d 767 [1996]). The fact that the court did not credit the testimony of either respondent or the children’s mother concerning the reason for the state of disarray of the residence “does not obviate the need for affirmative proof of neglect” *(Matter of Kenneth*V [appeal No. 2], 307 AD2d 767, 769 [2003]). We therefore reverse the order and dismiss the petition. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Kehoe, Martoche and Pine, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2513 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2513

To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand eligibility for burial 
  benefits to include certain veterans who die in State nursing homes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 19, 1995

  Mr. Stump (for himself, Mr. Montgomery, Mr. Everett, and Mr. Evans) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand eligibility for burial 
  benefits to include certain veterans who die in State nursing homes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF BURIAL BENEFITS.

    Section 2303(a) of title 38, United States Code, is amended to read 
as follows:
    ``(a)(1) When a veteran dies in a facility described in paragraph 
(2), the Secretary shall--
            ``(A) pay the actual cost (not to exceed $300) of the 
        burial and funeral or, within such limits, may make contracts 
        for such services without regard to the laws requiring 
        advertisement for proposals for supplies and services for the 
        Department; and
            ``(B) when such a death occurs in a State, transport the 
        body to the place of burial in the same or any other State.
    ``(2) A facility described in this paragraph is--
            ``(A) a Department facility (as defined in section 1701(4) 
        of this title) to which the deceased was properly admitted for 
        hospital, nursing home, or domiciliary care under section 1710 
        or 1711(a) of this title; or
            ``(B) an institution at which the deceased veteran was, at 
        the time of death, receiving--
                    ``(i) hospital care in accordance with section 1703 
                of this title;
                    ``(ii) nursing home care under section 1720 of this 
                title; or
                    ``(iii) nursing home care pursuant to payments made 
                under section 1741 of this title.''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-4135

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

HENRY MORRIS HAYES, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, 

District Judge. (1:12-cr-00177-CCE-1)

Submitted: September 13, 2013 Decided: October 3, 2013

Before AGEE, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jorgelina E. Araneda, ARANEDA LAW FIRM, P.C., Raleigh, North 

Carolina, for Appellant. Ripley Rand, United States Attorney, 

Frank J. Chut, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, 

Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Henry Morris Hayes pled guilty to two counts of 

embezzlement by a bank officer, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 656 

(2006), and was sentenced to twenty-seven months in prison. On 

appeal, Hayes argues that the district court erred by: (1) 

enhancing his offense level two levels under U.S. Sentencing 

Guidelines Manual (“USSG”) § 3B1.3 (2011), because the district 

court determined that Hayes abused a position of trust; and (2) 

refusing to grant him a downward departure sentence based on his 

alleged “extraordinary acceptance of responsibility.” We 

affirm. 

We find no clear error in the district court’s 

decision to enhance Hayes’ offense level under USSG § 3B1.3. 

See United States v. Ebersole, 411 F.3d 517, 535-36 (4th Cir. 

2005) (providing standard). Rather, the record reveals that 

Hayes’ business banker position aided his crimes and provided 

him with authority beyond “an ordinary bank teller.” USSG § 

3B1.3 cmt. n.1 (2011).

Moreover, we decline to review the district court’s 

denial of Hayes’ motion for a downward departure because the 

district court gave no indication that it did not understand its 

authority to depart downward. See United States v. Brewer, 520 

F.3d 367, 371 (4th Cir. 2008) (“We lack the authority to review 

a sentencing court’s denial of a downward departure unless the 
3

court failed to understand its authority to do so.”). In fact, 

the district court explicitly acknowledged the reasons Hayes 

believed he was entitled to a departure sentence and, although 

the district court stated it took these reasons into account, it 

explained that it believed a sentence at the top of Hayes’ 

Guidelines range was more appropriate because of the nature and 

circumstances of the offense. Because the district court 

clearly understood its authority to depart from Hayes’ 

Guidelines range, but nonetheless rejected Hayes’ request that 

it impose a lesser sentence, we will not disturb the district 

court’s refusal to impose a departure sentence.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

 DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CATHERINE PATRICE PAIGE,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D23-129

LT Case No. 16-2018-CF-3145

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Decision filed June 27, 2023

Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Duval County,

London M. Kite, Judge.

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, 

and Ross S. Haine, II, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for 

Appellant. 

No Appearance for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LAMBERT, C.J., BOATWRIGHT and KILBANE, JJ., concur.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 256.34 Does the Judgment Fund pay all litigation costs?

Fiscal Service certifies for payment only those costs that are enumerated in the cost statute, 28 U.S.C. 1920, or as set forth under a statute that specifically governs payment of the award.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1203

To provide an exemption for small cargo tank vehicles of 3,500 gallons

or less, transporting petroleum products, from certain hazardous material

transportation regulations.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 10, 1995

Mr. FRANKS of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. ALLARD, Mr. BEREUTER, and

Mr. LAHOOD) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To provide an exemption for small cargo tank vehicles of

3,500 gallons or less, transporting petroleum products,

from certain hazardous material transportation regulations.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hazardous Materials

5 Regulatory Relief Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. CARGO TANK EXEMPTION.

7 The Secretary of Transportation shall exclude from

8 the provisions of part 180 of title 49 of the Code of Fed-
2

•HR 1203 IH

1 eral Regulations, any cargo tank vehicle of 3500 gallons

2 or less of capacity, used to transport petroleum products

3 in intrastate or interstate transportation within 100 air

4 miles of the principal place of business of the owner or

5 lessee of the vehicle.

Æ
§ 34.302 Allocation of funds—Direct Component. The amounts made available in any fiscal year from the Trust Fund and allocated to this component will be available in equal shares for the Gulf Coast States for expenditure on eligible activities. The following entities are eligible to receive Direct Component grants. ( a ) The amounts available to Alabama will be provided directly to the Alabama Gulf Coast Recovery Council, or such administrative agent as it may designate. All administrative duties of the Alabama Gulf Coast Recovery Council must be performed by public officials and employees that are subject to the ethics laws of the State of Alabama.
( b ) Of the amounts available to Florida, 75 percent of funding will be provided directly to the eight disproportionately affected counties. Each disproportionately affected county's share is as follows: Bay County, 15.101453044%; Escambia County, 25.334760043%; Franklin County, 8.441253238%; Gulf County, 6.743202296%; Okaloosa County, 15.226456794%; Santa Rosa County, 10.497314919%; Wakulla County, 4.943148294%; and Walton County, 13.712411372%.
( c ) Of the amounts available to Florida, 25 percent of funding will be provided directly to the nondisproportionately impacted counties. Each nondisproportionately impacted county's share is as follows: Charlotte County, 5.162%; Citrus County, 4.692%; Collier County, 7.019%; Dixie County, 3.484%; Hernando County, 4.982%; Hillsborough County, 13.339%; Jefferson County, 3.834%; Lee County, 8.776%; Levy County, 3.894%; Manatee County, 6.809%; Monroe County, 8.297%; Pasco County, 7.079%; Pinellas County, 11.002%; Sarasota County, 7.248%; and Taylor County, 4.383%.
( d ) Of the amounts available to Louisiana, 70 percent will be provided directly to the Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority Board of Louisiana, through the Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority of Louisiana.
( e ) Of the amounts available to Louisiana, 30 percent will be provided directly to the coastal zone parishes. Each coastal zone parish's share is as follows: Ascension, 2.42612%; Assumption, 0.93028%; Calcasieu, 5.07063%; Cameron, 2.10096%; Iberia, 2.55018%; Jefferson, 11.95309%; Lafourche, 7.86746%; Livingston, 3.32725%; Orleans, 7.12875%; Plaquemines, 17.99998%; St. Bernard, 9.66743%; St. Charles, 1.35717%; St. James, 0.75600%; St. John the Baptist, 1.11915%; St. Martin, 2.06890%; St. Mary, 1.80223%; St. Tammany, 5.53058%; Tangipahoa, 3.40337%; Terrebonne, 9.91281%; and Vermilion, 3.02766%.
( f ) No parish will receive funds until the parish chief executive has certified to the Governor of Louisiana, in a form satisfactory to the Governor or the Governor's designee, that the parish has completed a comprehensive land use plan that is consistent with, or complementary to, the most recent version of the state's Coastal Master Plan approved by the Louisiana legislature.
( g ) The amounts available to Mississippi will be provided directly to the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality.
( h ) The amounts available to Texas will be provided directly to the Office of the Governor or to an appointee of the Office of the Governor.
Home1997 Treaties and Agreements...Argentina (97-826) – Agreement Regarding Mutual Assistance Between Customs Services

# 									Argentina (97-826) – Agreement Regarding Mutual Assistance Between Customs Services							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

August 26, 1997

Law Enforcement:  Customs Administrations

Signed at Buenos Aires December 4, 1990; entered into force August 26, 1997.
Download attachment						 [966 KB]

Tags

ArgentinaLaw EnforcementTreaties

Back to Top
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2504 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2504

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

                                 An Act

 
To designate the Federal building located at the corner of Patton Avenue 
   and Otis Street, and the United States courthouse located on Otis 
   Street, in Asheville, North Carolina, as the ``Veach-Baley Federal 
                               Complex''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at the corner of Patton Avenue and 
Otis Street, and the United States courthouse located on Otis Street, 
in Asheville, North Carolina, shall be known and designated as the 
``Veach-Baley Federal Complex''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the buildings referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Veach-Baley Federal 
Complex''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Home2023 Treaties and Agreements...Bahrain (23-1020) – Comprehensive Security Integration and Prosperity Agreement

# 									Bahrain (23-1020) – Comprehensive Security Integration and Prosperity Agreement							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

September 13, 2023

Defense

Signed at Washington September 13, 2023; entered into force October 20, 2023.
Download Agreement						 [792 KB]

Tags

BahrainDefenseSecurityTreaties

Back to Top
HomeBiographies...Rachel Schiller

# 				Rachel Schiller			

															Deputy Assistant Secretary for Programs and Operations						Bureau of Political-Military Affairs												

				June 20, 2023 -									Present							

Tags

Bureau of Political-Military AffairsState Department Official

Back to Top
HomeRecent Actions for Treaties for Which the United States is Depositary...Antarctica Recent Actions

# 									Antarctica Recent Actions							

Depositary Actions - Treaty Affairs

Office of Treaty Affairs

Antarctic Treaty – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Saudi Arabia, May 22, 2024

Antarctic Treaty – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; San Marino, February 14, 2023

Antarctic Treaty – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Slovenia, April 22, 2019

Antarctic Treaty: Annex V to Protocol on Environmental Protection – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Belarus, November 4, 2019

Antarctica – Protocol on Environmental Protection – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Colombia, Feb. 13, 2020

**Antarctic Treaty – Protocol on Environmental Protection – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Austria – July 27, 2021**

Antarctica – Amendment of Annex II to Protocol on Environmental Protection – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Canada February 23, 2022

Antarctica – Annex V to Protocol on Environmental Protection – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Canada, February 23, 2022

Antarctica – Antarctica Treaty – Notification of Deposit of Instrument; Costa Rica, August 11, 2022

Tags

AntarcticMultilateralTreaties

Back to Top
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 362.2 Amendments.

The Secretary of the Treasury may, at any time, or from time to time, make supplemental or amendatory declaration of valuables.

[4 FR 3796, Sept. 1, 1939, as amended at 5 FR 2653, July 25, 1940. Redesignated at 49 FR 47002, Nov. 30, 1984. Further redesignated at 50 FR 51394, Dec. 17, 1985]
§ 28.415 Access to course offerings. ( a ) A recipient shall not provide any course or otherwise carry out any of its education program or activity separately on the basis of sex, or require or refuse participation therein by any of its students on such basis, including health, physical education, industrial, business, vocational, technical, home economics, music, and adult education courses.
( b ) ( 1 ) With respect to classes and activities in physical education at the elementary school level, the recipient shall comply fully with this section as expeditiously as possible but in no event later than one year from September 29, 2000. With respect to physical education classes and activities at the secondary and post-secondary levels, the recipient shall comply fully with this section as expeditiously as possible but in no event later than three years from September 29, 2000.
( 2 ) This section does not prohibit grouping of students in physical education classes and activities by ability as assessed by objective standards of individual performance developed and applied without regard to sex.
( 3 ) This section does not prohibit separation of students by sex within physical education classes or activities during participation in wrestling, boxing, rugby, ice hockey, football, basketball, and other sports the purpose or major activity of which involves bodily contact.
( 4 ) Where use of a single standard of measuring skill or progress in a physical education class has an adverse effect on members of one sex, the recipient shall use appropriate standards that do not have such effect.
( 5 ) Portions of classes in elementary and secondary schools, or portions of education programs or activities, that deal exclusively with human sexuality may be conducted in separate sessions for boys and girls.
( 6 ) Recipients may make requirements based on vocal range or quality that may result in a chorus or choruses of one or predominantly one sex.
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Charles Lee Levan, Jr.

, * From the 29 th District Court

of Palo Pinto County,

Trial Court No. 11,625

.

Vs. No. 11

- 2 3

- 00 2 86

- C R * January 4 , 20 2 4

The State of Texas

, * Memorand um Opinion by Bailey

, C. J.

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the appeal

should be dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the appeal

is dismissed.
#### JENNIE A. WILLINK, EXECUTRIX, v. THE UNITED STATES.

[38 C. Cls. R., 693; 49 C. Cls. R., 701; 240 U. S. R., 572.]

*On the plamtifs appeal.*

The officer of engineers in charge of the improvement of the harbor of Savannah enters into a contract for widening the river by-cutting away the claimant’s land, but the contractor does not enter or encroach upon the property. The officer also notifies the claimant to cease making improvements necessary for carrying on his business upon his river frontage, and the United States district attorney writes the claimant a letter intimating that if he does not comply with the officer’s demand proceedings will be instituted against him to recover the penalties prescribed by the act, 19th September, 1890. 26 Stat. L., 453. The claimant desists, to the great injury of his business. He sues for constructive use and occupation during a period of five years, at the expiration of which time the old harbor line is reestablished by the Secretary of War.

On the first trial of this case, 38 C. Cls. R., 693, judgment was rendered for plaintiff. Defendants’ motion for new trial was allowed. Thereafter the case was heard again by the court and the petition was dismissed without an opinion.

The judgment of the court below is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Yah Devanter

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court April 3, 1916.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 226.6 Financial reports.

Financial reports of Insurance Organizations shall be submitted to the Treasury at the same intervals they are submitted to State regulatory authorities. However, they need not be submitted more frequently than quarterly but, as a minimum, shall be submitted annually. The Treasury may prescribe the format of such reports.
#### § 150.1 Scope.

The assessments contained in this part are made pursuant to the authority contained in 12 U.S.C. 5345.
Exhibit 4.3

 





Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated August 28, 2012, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-183320) of Smart Trust, Diversified
Income and Growth Trust, Series 3.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


Grant
Thornton LLP


Chicago, Illinois


August 28, 2012
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 370.14 Can substitute payment procedures be used?

We may use substitute payment procedures, instead of ACH, if we consider it to be necessary. Any such action is final.