42804 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 163 / Tuesday, August 25, 2009 / Proposed Rules 

maintain accurate records and accounts 

that will document that they meet all 

eligibility requirements specified 

herein, as may be requested. Such 

records and accounts must be retained 

for 2 years after the date of the final 

payment to the producer under this 

program. 

(b) At all times during regular 

business hours, authorized 

representatives of the U.S. Department 

of Agriculture or any agency thereof, the 

Comptroller General of the United 

States shall have access to the premises 

of the producer in order to inspect, 

examine, and make copies of the books, 

records, and accounts, and other written 

data as specified in paragraph (a) of this 

section. 

(c) Audits of certifications of average 

adjusted gross income may be 

conducted as necessary to determine 

compliance with the requirements of 

this subpart. As a part of this audit, 

income tax forms may be requested and 

if requested, must be supplied. If a 

producer has submitted information to 

FSA, including a certification from a 

certified public accountant or attorney, 

that relied upon information from a 

form previously filed with the Internal 

Revenue Service, such producer shall 

provide FSA a copy of any amended 

form filed with the Internal Revenue 

Service within 30 days of the filing. 

(d) If requested in writing by the U.S. 

Department of Agriculture or any 

agency thereof, or the Comptroller 

General of the United States, the 

producer shall provide all information 

and documentation the reviewing 

authority determines necessary to verify 

any information or certification 

provided under this subpart, including 

all documents referred to in 

§ 1580.301(c) of this title, within 30 

days. Acceptable production 

documentation may be submitted by 

facsimile, in person, or by mail and may 

include copies of receipts, ledgers, 

income statements, deposit slips, 

register tapes, invoices for custom 

harvesting, records to verify production 

costs, contemporaneous measurements, 

truck scale tickets, fish tickets, landing 

reports, and contemporaneous diaries 

that are determined acceptable. Failure 

to provide necessary and accurate 

information to verify compliance, or 

failure to comply with this part’s 

requirements, will result in ineligibility 

for all program benefits subject to this 

part for the year or years subject to the 

request. 

§ 1580.503 Recovery of overpayments. 

(a) If the Administrator (FAS) 

determines that any producer has 

received any payment under this 

program to which the producer was not 

entitled, or has expended funds 

received under this program for any 

purpose that was not approved by the 

Administrator (FAS) such producer will 

be liable to repay such amount. The 

Administrator (FAS) may waive such 

repayment if it is determined that: 

(1) The payment was made without 

fault on the part of the producer; and 

(2) Requiring such repayment would 

be contrary to equity and good 

conscience. 

(b) Unless an overpayment is 

otherwise recovered, or waived under 

paragraph (a) of this section, the 

Administrator (FAS) shall recover the 

overpayment as a debt following the 

procedures in 7 CFR part 3. The 

requirement for demand and notice and 

opportunity for a hearing under the debt 

collection procedures in 7 CFR part 3 

shall satisfy the notice and hearing 

requirements under 19 U.S.C. 2401f(c), 

and the appeal procedures in § 1580.505 

of this title shall not apply to collection 

of overpayments. 

§ 1580.504 Debarment and suspension 

and penalties. 

(a) Generally. The regulations 

governing Governmentwide Debarment 

and Suspension (Nonprocurement), 7 

CFR part 3017, and Government 

Requirements for Drug-Free Workplace 

(Financial Assistance), 7 CFR part 3021, 

apply to this part. 

(b) Additional specific suspension 

and debarment provision for this 

program. In addition to any other 

debarment or suspension of a producer 

under paragraph (a) of this section, in 

connection with this program, if the 

Administrator (FAS) or a court of 

competent jurisdiction determines that a 

producer: 

(1) Knowingly has made, or caused 

another to make, a false statement or 

representation of a material fact, or 

(2) Knowingly has failed, or caused 

another to fail, to disclose a material 

fact; and, as a result of such false 

statement or representation, or of such 

nondisclosure, such producer has 

received any payment under this 

program to which the producer was not 

entitled, the Administrator (FAS) shall 

suspend and debar such producer from 

any future payments under this 

program, as provided in 19 U.S.C. 

2401f(b). 

(c) Criminal penalty. Whoever makes 

a false statement of a material fact 

knowing it to be false, or knowingly 

fails to disclose a material fact, for the 

purpose of obtaining or increasing for 

himself or for any other producer any 

payments authorized to be furnished 

under this program shall be fined not 

more than $10,000 or imprisoned for not 

more than 1 year, or both. 

§ 1580.505 Appeals. 

(a) A producer adversely affected by 

a determination with respect to their 

application for trade adjustment 

assistance under § 1580.301 or with 

respect to the receipt of technical 

assistance or payments under 

§ 1580.302 may file a notice of appeal 

within 30 days of the date that the 

notification of the adverse 

determination was sent. The notice of 

appeal should indicate whether the 

producer is requesting a hearing. 

(b) Any hearing conducted under 

paragraph (a) of this section, shall be in 

accordance with instructions issued by 

the Administrator (FAS). 

(c) A producer may not seek judicial 

review of any adverse decision under 

this paragraph without receiving a final 

determination pursuant to this 

paragraph. 

§ 1580.506 Judicial review. 

Any producer aggrieved by a final 

agency determination under this part 

may appeal to the U.S. Court of 

International Trade for a review of such 

determination in accordance with its 

rules and procedures. 

§ 1580.602 Paperwork Reduction Act 

assigned number. 

The information collection 

requirements contained in these 

regulations (7 CFR part 1580) have been 

approved by the Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB) under the provisions 

of 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35 and been 

assigned OMB control number 0551– 

0040. 

Dated: June 10, 2009. 

Michael V. Michener, 

Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service. 

[FR Doc. E9–20345 Filed 8–24–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–10–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2009–0717; Directorate 

Identifier 2009–NM–002–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model 

A310 Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 163 / Tuesday, August 25, 2009 / Proposed Rules 42805 

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for the 

products listed above. This proposed 

AD results from mandatory continuing 

airworthiness information (MCAI) 

originated by an aviation authority of 

another country to identify and correct 

an unsafe condition on an aviation 

product. The MCAI describes the unsafe 

condition as: 

Following scheduled maintenance, an 

A310 operator reported finding cracks 

around the wing top skin panels fastener 

holes at Rib 2 (LH or RH) [left-hand or righthand], between stringers 2 and 14 on some 

of its aircraft. 

This condition, if not corrected, may lead 

to degradation of the structure in this area. 

An inspection programme is necessary to 

restore and retain the structural integrity. 

* * * * * 

The proposed AD would require 

actions that are intended to address the 

unsafe condition described in the MCAI. 

DATES: We must receive comments on 

this proposed AD by September 24, 

2009. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by 

any of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Fax: (202) 493–2251. 

• Mail: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 

Washington, DC 20590. 

• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–40, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 

Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. 

For service information identified in 

this proposed AD, contact Airbus, 

Airbus SAS–EAW (Airworthiness 

Office), 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 

31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone 

+33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 

51; e-mail: account.airwortheas@airbus.com; Internet http:// 

www.airbus.com. You may review 

copies of the referenced service 

information at the FAA, Transport 

Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind 

Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221 

or 425–227–1152. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http:// 

www.regulations.gov; or in person at the 

Docket Operations office between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. The AD docket 

contains this proposed AD, the 

regulatory evaluation, any comments 

received, and other information. The 

street address for the Docket Operations 

office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in 

the ADDRESSES section. Comments will 

be available in the AD docket shortly 

after receipt. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan 

Rodina, Aerospace Engineer, 

International Branch, ANM–116, 

Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 

1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 

Washington 98057–3356; telephone 

(425) 227–2125; fax (425) 227–1149. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

We invite you to send any written 

relevant data, views, or arguments about 

this proposed AD. Send your comments 

to an address listed under the 

ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No. 

FAA–2009–0717; Directorate Identifier 

2009–NM–002–AD’’ at the beginning of 

your comments. We specifically invite 

comments on the overall regulatory, 

economic, environmental, and energy 

aspects of this proposed AD. We will 

consider all comments received by the 

closing date and may amend this 

proposed AD based on those comments. 

We will post all comments we 

receive, without change, to http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information you provide. We 

will also post a report summarizing each 

substantive verbal contact we receive 

about this proposed AD. 

Discussion 

The European Aviation Safety 

Agency, which is the Technical Agent 

for the Member States of the European 

Community, has issued EASA 

Airworthiness Directive 2008–0211, 

dated December 4, 2008 (referred to 

after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an 

unsafe condition for the specified 

products. The MCAI states: 

Following scheduled maintenance, an 

A310 operator reported finding cracks 

around the wing top skin panels fastener 

holes at Rib 2 (LH or RH) [left-hand or righthand], between stringers 2 and 14 on some 

of its aircraft. 

This condition, if not corrected, may lead 

to degradation of the structure in this area. 

An inspection programme is necessary to 

restore and retain the structural integrity. 

For the reason described above, this AD 

requires the implementation of an inspection 

programme that will ensure that any visible 

cracks in the wing top skin panels 1 and 2 

along Rib 2 are detected in time and repaired 

appropriately. 

Note: The General Visual Inspection 

requested by the existing and applicable 

Airworthiness Limitation Items (ALI) tasks 

may not be adequate to detect these cracks. 

You may obtain further information 

by examining the MCAI in the AD 

docket. 

Relevant Service Information 

Airbus has issued Mandatory Service 

Bulletin A310–57–2096, dated May 6, 

2008. The actions described in this 

service information are intended to 

correct the unsafe condition identified 

in the MCAI. 

FAA’s Determination and Requirements 

of This Proposed AD 

This product has been approved by 

the aviation authority of another 

country, and is approved for operation 

in the United States. Pursuant to our 

bilateral agreement with the State of 

Design Authority, we have been notified 

of the unsafe condition described in the 

MCAI and service information 

referenced above. We are proposing this 

AD because we evaluated all pertinent 

information and determined an unsafe 

condition exists and is likely to exist or 

develop on other products of the same 

type design. 

Differences Between This AD and the 

MCAI or Service Information 

We have reviewed the MCAI and 

related service information and, in 

general, agree with their substance. But 

we might have found it necessary to use 

different words from those in the MCAI 

to ensure the AD is clear for U.S. 

operators and is enforceable. In making 

these changes, we do not intend to differ 

substantively from the information 

provided in the MCAI and related 

service information. 

We might also have proposed 

different actions in this AD from those 

in the MCAI in order to follow FAA 

policies. Any such differences are 

highlighted in a note within the 

proposed AD. 

Costs of Compliance 

Based on the service information, we 

estimate that this proposed AD would 

affect about 66 products of U.S. registry. 

We also estimate that it would take 

about 2 work-hours per product to 

comply with the basic requirements of 

this proposed AD. The average labor 

rate is $80 per work-hour. Based on 

these figures, we estimate the cost of the 

proposed AD on U.S. operators to be 

$10,560, or $160 per product. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
42806 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 163 / Tuesday, August 25, 2009 / Proposed Rules 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We determined that this proposed AD 

would not have federalism implications 

under Executive Order 13132. This 

proposed AD would not have a 

substantial direct effect on the States, on 

the relationship between the national 

Government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify this proposed regulation: 

1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 

2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and 

3. Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

We prepared a regulatory evaluation 

of the estimated costs to comply with 

this proposed AD and placed it in the 

AD docket. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 

39 as follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new AD: 

Airbus: Docket No. FAA–2009–0717; 

Directorate Identifier 2009–NM–002–AD. 

Comments Due Date 

(a) We must receive comments by 

September 24, 2009. 

Affected ADs 

(b) None. 

Applicability 

(c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A310– 

203, –204, –221, –222, –304, –322, –324, and 

–325 airplanes; certificated in any category. 

Subject 

(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 57: Wings. 

Reason 

(e) The mandatory continuing 

airworthiness information (MCAI) states: 

Following scheduled maintenance, an 

A310 operator reported finding cracks 

around the wing top skin panels fastener 

holes at Rib 2 (LH or RH) [left-hand or righthand], between stringers 2 and 14 on some 

of its aircraft. 

This condition, if not corrected, may lead 

to degradation of the structure in this area. 

An inspection programme is necessary to 

restore and retain the structural integrity. 

For the reason described above, this AD 

requires the implementation of an inspection 

programme that will ensure that any visible 

cracks in the wing top skin panels 1 and 2 

along Rib 2 are detected in time and repaired 

appropriately. 

Note: The General Visual Inspection 

requested by the existing and applicable 

Airworthiness Limitation Items (ALI) tasks 

may not be adequate to detect these cracks. 

Actions and Compliance 

(f) Unless already done, do the following 

actions: 

(1) Do a detailed visual inspection around 

fastener holes in the wing top skin panels 1 

and 2, along rib 2 between the right side and 

left side of the front and rear spars, at the 

applicable compliance time in Table 1 of this 

AD; as applicable to the airplane model and 

Short Range (SR) use, average flight time 

(AFT) equal to or less than 4 hours; or Long 

Range (LR) use, AFT exceeding 4 hours; in 

accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of Airbus Mandatory Service 

Bulletin A310–57–2096, dated May 6, 2008. 

Note 1: To establish the AFT, take the 

accumulated flight time (counted from the 

take-off up to the landing) and divide by the 

number of accumulated flight cycles. This 

gives the average flight time per flight cycle. 

TABLE 1—COMPLIANCE TIMES FOR DETAILED VISUAL INSPECTION

Model Compliance time 

(whichever occurs later) 

(i) A310–203, A310–204, A310-221, and A310–222 airplanes.(A) Prior to the accumulation of 18,700 flight cycles or 37,400 flight hours since first 

flight of the airplane, whichever occurs first; or 

(B) Within 430 flight cycles or 860 flight hours, whichever occurs first, after the effective date of this AD. 

(ii) ‘SR’ A310–304, A310–322, A310–324, and A310– 

325 short range airplanes.

(A) Prior to the accumulation of 17,300 flight cycles or 48,400 flight hours since first 

flight of the airplane, whichever occurs first; or 

(B) Within 400 flight cycles or 1,100 flight hours, whichever occurs first, after the effective date of this AD. 

(iii) ‘LR’ A310–304, A310–322, A310-324, and A310– 

325 long range airplanes.

(A) Prior to accumulation of 12,800 flight cycles or 64,300 flight hours since first flight 

of the airplane, whichever occurs first; or 

(B) Within 300 flight cycles or 1,450 flight hours, whichever occurs first, after the effective date of this AD. 

(2) As of the effective date of this AD, if 

any repair has already been done as a result 

of finding skin cracks at rib 2 in the area to 

be inspected, the inspection requirements of 

this AD are not required for the repaired area. 

Instead, for previously repaired areas, 

continue the inspection in accordance with 

the procedures specified in paragraph (g) of 

this AD. The rest of the rib 2 area not covered 

by the repair must be inspected in 

accordance with the requirements of this AD. 

(3) If no crack is found, repeat the 

inspection required by paragraph (f)(1) of this 

AD thereafter at the intervals not to exceed 

those specified in Table 2 of this AD, as 

applicable. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 163 / Tuesday, August 25, 2009 / Proposed Rules 42807 

TABLE 2—COMPLIANCE TIMES FOR REPETITIVE INSPECTION INTERVAL

Model Repetitive inspection interval 

A310–203, A310–204, A310-221, and A310–222 airplanes .................... Within 1,700 flight cycles or 3,500 flight hours, whichever occurs first. 

‘SR’ A310–304, A310–322, A310–324, and A310–325 short range airplanes.Within 1,600 flight cycles or 4,600 flight hours, whichever occurs first. 

‘LR’ A310–304, A310–322, A310-324, and A310–325 long range airplanes.Within 1,200 flight cycles or 6,100 flight hours, whichever occurs first. 

(4) If any crack is found during any 

inspection required by paragraph (f)(1) or 

(f)(3) of this AD, before further flight, repair 

in accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of Airbus Mandatory Service 

Bulletin A310–57–2096, dated May 6, 2008. 

Instead, for previously repaired areas, 

continue the inspection in accordance with 

the procedures specified in paragraph (g) of 

this AD. 

(5) After each inspection required by this 

AD, submit an inspection report in 

accordance with Airbus Mandatory Service 

Bulletin A310–57–2096, dated May 6, 2008; 

at the times specified in paragraphs (f)(5)(i) 

or (f)(5)(ii) of this AD, as applicable. 

(i) If the inspection was done after the 

effective date of this AD: Submit the report 

within 30 days after the inspection. 

(ii) If the inspection was accomplished 

prior to the effective date of this AD: Submit 

the report within 30 days after the effective 

date of this AD. 

FAA AD Differences 

Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI 

and/or service information as follows: No 

differences. 

Other FAA AD Provisions 

(g) The following provisions also apply to 

this AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, International 

Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, FAA, has the authority to 

approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. 

Send information to ATTN: Dan Rodina, 

Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, 

ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 

Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425) 

227–2125; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using 

any approved AMOC on any airplane to 

which the AMOC applies, notify your 

principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or 

principal avionics inspector (PAI), as 

appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector, 

your local Flight Standards District Office. 

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement 

in this AD to obtain corrective actions from 

a manufacturer or other source, use these 

actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective 

actions are considered FAA-approved if they 

are approved by the State of Design Authority 

(or their delegated agent). You are required 

to assure the product is airworthy before it 

is returned to service. 

(3) Reporting Requirements: For any 

reporting requirement in this AD, under the 

provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 

the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 

has approved the information collection 

requirements and has assigned OMB Control 

Number 2120–0056. 

Related Information 

(h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation 

Safety Agency Airworthiness Directive 2008– 

0211, dated December 4, 2008; and Airbus 

Mandatory Service Bulletin A310–57–2096, 

dated May 6, 2008, for related information. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 

17, 2009. 

Ali Bahrami, 

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. E9–20352 Filed 8–24–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2009–0718; Directorate 

Identifier 2009–NM–025–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Boeing 

Model 747 Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for all 

Boeing Model 747 airplanes. This 

proposed AD would require one-time 

detailed and high frequency eddy 

current inspections for cracks in the 

wing and horizontal stabilizer side-ofbody joints and the fuselage skin 

circumferential splices, and repair if 

necessary. This proposed AD would 

also require, for certain airplanes, 

repetitive detailed inspections for cracks 

of the fuselage skin circumferential 

splices, and repair if necessary. This 

proposed AD results from Boeing 

analysis indicating that the wing and 

horizontal stabilizer side-of-body joints, 

and the fuselage skin circumferential 

splices are susceptible to fatigue 

cracking due to high cyclic loads on the 

airplane. We are proposing this AD to 

detect and correct fatigue cracking at 

multiple adjacent locations in the 

subject areas, which could connect to 

form large cracks and result in reduced 

structural integrity leading to rapid 

decompression and consequent loss of 

control of the airplane. 

DATES: We must receive comments on 

this proposed AD by October 9, 2009. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by 

any of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Fax: 202–493–2251. 

• Mail: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 

Washington, DC 20590. 

• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 

Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. 

For service information identified in 

this proposed AD, contact Boeing 

Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data 

& Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, 

MC 2H–65, Seattle, Washington 98124– 

2207; telephone 206–544–5000, 

extension 1, fax 206–766–5680; e-mail 

me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet 

https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You 

may review copies of the referenced 

service information at the FAA, 

Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 

Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. 

For information on the availability of 

this material at the FAA, call 425–227– 

1221 or 425–227–1152. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http:// 

www.regulations.gov; or in person at the 

Docket Management Facility between 9 

a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD 

docket contains this proposed AD, the 

regulatory evaluation, any comments 

received, and other information. The 

street address for the Docket Office 

(telephone 800–647–5527) is in the 

ADDRESSES section. Comments will be 

available in the AD docket shortly after 

receipt. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ivan 

Li, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS