### 9527 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 41 / Wednesday, March 3, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

Global Plus 2 (MC2008–7,

CP2008–48 and CP2008–49) Inbound International Inbound Direct Entry Contracts

with Foreign Postal Administrations

Inbound Direct Entry Contracts with Foreign Postal Administrations (MC2008–6, CP2008–14 and MC2008–15)Inbound Direct Entry Contracts with Foreign Postal Administrations 1 (MC2008– 6 and CP2009–62)International Business Reply Service Competitive Contract 1 (MC2009–14 and CP2009–20) Competitive Product Descriptions Express Mail [Reserved for Group Description] Express Mail [Reserved for Product Description] Outbound International Expedited

Services [Reserved for Product Description] Inbound International Expedited

Services [Reserved for Product Description] Priority [Reserved for Product Description] Priority Mail [Reserved for Product Description]Outbound Priority Mail International [Reserved for Product Description] Inbound Air Parcel Post [Reserved for Product Description] Parcel Select [Reserved for Group Description] Parcel Return Service [Reserved for Group Description] International [Reserved for Group Description] International Priority Airlift (IPA) [Reserved for Product Description] International Surface Airlift (ISAL) [Reserved for Prduct Description] International Direct Sacks—M–

Bags [Reserved for Product Description]Global Customized Shipping Services [Reserved for Product Description]International Money Transfer Service [Reserved for Product Description] Inbound Surface Parcel Post (at

non-UPU rates) [Reserved for Product Description] International Ancillary Services [Reserved for Product Description] International Certificate of Mailing [Reserved for Product Description] International Registered Mail [Reserved for Product Description] International Return Receipt [Reserved for Product Description] International Restricted Delivery [Reserved for Product Description] International Insurance [Reserved for Product Description] Negotiated Service Agreements [Reserved for Group Description] Domestic [Reserved for Product Description] Outbound International [Reserved for Group Description]Part C—Glossary of Terms and Conditions [Reserved]Part D—Country Price Lists for International Mail [Reserved]

[FR Doc. 2010–4410 Filed 3–2–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 7710–FW–S**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**40 CFR Part 180**

**[EPA–HQ–OPP–2008–0750; FRL–8800–9]**

**Trichoderma asperellum strain ICC 012; Exemption from the Requirement**  **of a Tolerance**

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Final rule.

**SUMMARY :**  This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of the Trichoderma asperellum strain ICC 012 on all food/feed commodities when applied pre-harvest in accordance with good agricultural practices. Isagro, S.p.A. submitted a petition to EPA under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. This regulation eliminates the need to establish a maximum permissible level for residues of Trichoderma asperellum strain ICC 012.

**DATES :**  This regulation is effective March 3, 2010. Objections and requests for hearings must be received on or before May 3, 2010, and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the **SUPPLEMENTARY**
**INFORMATION** ).

**ADDRESSES :**  EPA has established a docket for this action under docket identification (ID) number EPA–HQ– OPP–2008–0750. All documents in the docket are listed in the docket index available at http://www.regulations.gov

. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available in the electronic docket at http://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard copy, at the OPP Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S– 4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket Facility telephone number is (703) 305–

5805.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Susanne Cerrelli, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division (7511P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone number: (703) 308–8077; e-mail address: cerrelli.susanne@epa.gov

. **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 

I. General Information A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:

• Crop production (NAICS code 111).

• Animal production (NAICS code 112).

• Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).

• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).

This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the person listed under **FOR FURTHER**
**INFORMATION CONTACT**

. B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies of this Document?

You may access a frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 through the Government Printing Office’s e-CFR site at http:// www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr

. C. Can I File an Objection or Hearing Request?

Under section 408(g) of FFDCA, 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a hearing on those objections. The EPA procedural regulations which govern the submission of objections and requests for hearings appear in 40 CFR part 178. You must file your objection or request a hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure


### 9528 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 41 / Wednesday, March 3, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

proper receipt by EPA, you must identify docket ID number EPA–HQ– OPP–2008–0750 in the subject line on the first page of your submission. All requests must be in writing, and must be mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk on or before May 3, 2010.

In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of the filing that does not contain any CBI for inclusion in the public docket that is described in

**ADDRESSES** . Information not marked confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice. Submit your copies, identified by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–2008–0750, by one of the following methods.

• Federal eRulemaking Portal : http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.

• Mail : Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.

• Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S–4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only accepted during the Docket Facility’s normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays). Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The Docket Facility telephone number is (703) 305–5805. II. Background and Statutory Findings

In the Federal Register of November 12, 2008 (73 FR 66897) (FRL–8386–8), EPA issued a notice pursuant to section 408(d)(3) of FFDCA, 21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide tolerance petition (PP 8F7326) by Isagro, S.p.A., Via Caldera 21, fabbricato D, la 3, 20153 Milano, Italy. The petition requested that 40 CFR part 180 be amended by establishing an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of Trichoderma asperellum strain ICC 012 (originally classified as Trichoderma harzianum ). The docket for this notice (EPA–HQ– OPP–2008–0750) included a summary of the petition prepared by the petitioner Isagro, S.p.A. An anonymous American citizen commented that only zero residue should be allowed and expressed concern about toxic chemicals found in the bodies of Americans. Pursuant to its authority under FIFRA, the Agency conducted a rigorous assessment of Trichoderma asperellum strain ICC 012 and concluded that it is not expected to cause any unreasonable adverse effects to human health or the environment. The Agency is establishing an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for this active ingredient, as neither toxicity nor pathogenicity were observed for this active ingredient in submitted laboratory studies.

Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish an exemption from the requirement for a tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that the exemption is ‘‘ safe. ’’ Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ‘‘ safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable information. ’’ This includes exposure through drinking water and in residential settings, but does not include occupational exposure. Pursuant to section 408(c)(2)(B) of FFDCA, in establishing or maintaining in effect an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance, EPA must take into account the factors set forth in sections 408(b)(2)(C) and (D) of FFDCA, which require EPA to give special consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and

to ‘‘ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . . . ’’ Additionally, section 408(b)(2)(D) of FFDCA requires that the Agency consider ‘‘available information concerning the cumulative effects ’’ of a particular pesticide’s residues and

‘‘ other substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity. ’’

EPA performs a number of analyses to determine the risks from aggregate exposure to pesticide residues. First, EPA determines the toxicity of pesticides. Second, EPA examines exposure to the pesticide through food, drinking water, and through other exposures that occur as a result of pesticide use in residential settings. III. Toxicological Profile

Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D) of FFDCA, EPA has reviewed the available scientific data and other relevant information in support of this action and considered its validity, completeness, and reliability and the relationship of this information to human risk. EPA has also considered available information concerning the variability of the sensitivities of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and children.

Trichoderma asperellum strain ICC 012 was isolated from a suppressive soil in central Italy. Trichoderma asperellum strain ICC 012 is used for control of many soil borne fungal plant pathogens i.e., Pythium species (spp.), Phytophthora spp., Sclerotinia spp., Sclerotium spp., Thielaviopsis basicola, Rhizoctonia spp., Verticillium spp. Trichoderma asperellum strain ICC 012 acts as a pathogen antagonist, colonizing in soil and roots to compete with plant pathogenic fungi for space and nutrients. Moreover, Trichoderma asperellum strain ICC 012 also attacks the cell walls of pathogens with

enzymes.

Toxicological data on the active ingredient, submitted by the manufacturer, Isagro, S.p.A., has been accepted to support the current exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues and various registrations.

EPA review of these studies indicated that the active ingredient was not toxic to test animals when administered via the oral, dermal, intraperitoneal or pulmonary routes of exposure. The active ingredient was not infective or pathogenic to test animals when administered via the pulmonary route. This pulmonary clearance is enough evidence to demonstrate no infectivity. No reports of hypersensitivity have been recorded from personnel working with this organism. Based on these data, the Agency has concluded that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure to residues of Trichoderma asperellum strain ICC 012, including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable information. Thus, under the standard in section 408(c)(2) of FFDCA, an exemption from the requirement for a tolerance is appropriate. Studies on the active ingredient include the following:

In an acute oral toxicity study Master Record Identification Number (MRID 47345901), groups of fasted, 6-7 week old rats (5/sex) were given a single oral dose of Trichoderma asperellum strain ICC 012 ( Trichoderma asperellum conidia 4.2 x 10 9 CFU/g) in 0.9% NaCl solution at a dose of 2,000 milligrams/ kilograms (mg/kg) of body weight (bw) in a limit test. The animals were then observed for a period of 14 days. The following Oral lethal dose (LD) 50 findings for males, females, and combined were reported: Males > 2,000 mg/kg of bw, females > 2,000 mg/kg of bw, combined > 2,000 mg/kg of bw. No mortality occurred during the study. Based on the results of this study,


### 9529 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 41 / Wednesday, March 3, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

Trichoderma asperellum strain ICC 012 was not toxic at 2,000 mg/kg of bw.

In an acute intraperitoneal injection toxicity study (MRID 47345902), groups of fasted, 6-7 week old rats (3/sex) were injected with Trichoderma asperellum strain ICC 012 ( Trichoderma asperellum conidia 4.2 x 10 9 CFU/g) in 0.9% NaCl solution at a dose of 1 x 10 8 CFU/g in a limit test. Animals were then observed for up to 21 days. Control animals were injected with 0.9% NaCl solution only. Trichoderma asperellum strain ICC 012 is not toxic based on these results.

In an acute pulmonary toxicity/ pathogenicity study (MRID’s 47345903, 47345904), groups of fasted, 44-55 day old rats (31/sex) were exposed by the intratracheal route to Trichoderma asperellum strain ICC 012 ( Trichoderma asperellum conidia 4.2 x 10 9 CFU/g) in a 0.1% solution of Tween 20 in water for injection at a dose of 1 x 10 8 CFU/ animal. Animals were then observed for up to 22 days. Rats in the control group were administered the vehicle only. Rats in the reference groups were administered inactivated test item. There were no treatment related clinical signs or changes in bw. Samples of feces, lungs, lymph nodes, kidneys, brain, liver, spleen, and blood were taken for the determination of microbial enumeration. The viable count was 4.2

x 10 9 CFU/g and the greatest density was detected in lung tissue. The pulmonary LD 50 observed was: Males >

1 x 10 7 CFU/animal, females > 1 x 10 7 CFU/animal, combined > 1 x 10 7 CFU/ animal. No mortalities occurred during the study. Based on these results, Trichoderma asperellum strain ICC 012 is of low toxicity and is not infective or pathogenic in the rat.
IV. Aggregate Exposures

In examining aggregate exposure, section 408 of FFDCA directs EPA to consider available information concerning exposures from the pesticideresidue in food and all other nonoccupational exposures, including drinking water from ground water or surface water and exposure through pesticide use in gardens, lawns, or buildings (residential and other indoor uses).
A. Dietary Exposure

Dietary exposure to the microbial pesticide is likely to occur. However, the lack of acute oral toxicity, infectivity, and pathogenicity support the establishment of an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for Trichoderma asperellum strain ICC 012.

1. Food. Dietary exposure to the microbe is expected to be minimal. The product is typically applied to soil and sometimes may be applied when the crops are growing in the field, resulting in residues on the crops. The Agency expects residues on food to be minimal because this pesticide is typically applied to soil, rather than crops. Moreover, Trichoderma lives in soils and is unlikely to live on the plants because any spores that do end up on the plant due to application will likely decrease over time due to weathering, desiccation and ultraviolet radiation which can kill even quiescent forms of the fungus. In the unlikely event that the applied fungus can grow on edible portions of the treated crop, there is no hazard present in these residues, as demonstrated by the results of testing which show no toxicity or pathogenicity in treated animals when dosed with the fungus at orders of magnitude above any expected exposure to the microbial pesticide.

2. Drinking water exposure . Drinking water exposure is expected to be negligible because Trichoderma asperellum strain ICC 012 is not applied to water, nor is it expected to proliferate in aquatic environments because Trichoderma asperellum lives in soil. Moreover, the Agency believes that Trichoderma within the soil will not likely percolate into water because of the large size of the fungal spores and the fact that they adhere to soil particles. Even if oral exposure should occur through drinking water, the Agency concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from the exposure to the residues of Trichoderma asperellum in all the anticipated drinking water exposures because of the lack of acute oral toxicity/pathogenicity to mammals, as previously described. B. Other Non-Occupational Exposure

Trichoderma asperellum strain ICC 012 is a naturally occurring microbe and is ubiquitous in the environment. Trichoderma asperellum strain ICC 012 will be applied to substrate mixes, ornamental plants, agricultural fields, turf, and various plants grown in greenhouses. Although some applications to turf or ornamental plants may be in residential areas, non-dietary exposure would be expected to be below the Agency’s level of concern because of its low toxicity classification, and because the lab results indicate Trichoderma asperellum strain ICC 012 is not pathogenic to mammals.

V. Cumulative Effects

Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires the Agency to consider the cumulative effect of exposure to Trichoderma asperellum strain ICC 012 and to other substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity. These considerations include the possible cumulative effects of such residues on infants and children. Based on tests in mammalian systems, Trichoderma asperellum strain ICC 012 does not appear to be toxic to humans via dietary and pulmonary exposure. Therefore, the requirement to consider cumulative effects does not apply. VI. Determination of Safety for U.S. Population, Infants and Children

Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA, as amended by the Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) of 1996, provides that EPA shall assess the available information about consumption patterns among infants and children, special susceptibility of infants and children to pesticide chemical residues, and the cumulative effects on infants and children of the residues and other substances with a common mechanism of toxicity. In addition, section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA provides that EPA shall apply an additional tenfold margin of safety for infants and children in the case of threshold effects to account for prenatal and postnatal toxicity and the completeness of the database unless EPA determines that a different margin of safety will be safe for infants and children.

Based on the acute toxicity information discussed in this unit, EPA concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure to the United States population, including infants and children, to residues of Trichoderma asperellum strain ICC 012. This includes all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable information. The Agency has arrived at this conclusion because the data available on Trichoderma asperellum strain ICC 012 demonstrate a low toxicity/ pathogenicity potential. Trichoderma asperellum strain ICC 012 is not a human pathogen and has not been implicated in human disease. Thus, there are no threshold effects of concern and, as a result, the provision requiring an additional margin of safety does not apply.

VII. Other Considerations A. Endocrine Disruptors

The Agency has no information to suggest that Trichoderma asperellum strain ICC 012 has an effect on the endocrine system. No specific tests have been conducted with Trichoderma asperellum strain ICC 012 to determine such effects. However, the submitted


### 9530 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 41 / Wednesday, March 3, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

toxicity/pathogenicity studies in rodents indicated that following several routes of exposure, the immune system is still intact and able to process and clear the active ingredient. Trichoderma asperellum strain ICC 012 is a ubiquitous organism in the environment and there have been no reports of the organism affecting endocrine systems. Therefore, it is unlikely that this organism would have estrogenic or endocrine effects, and it is practically non-toxic to mammals. B. Analytical Method

The Agency proposes to establish an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance without any numerical limitation; therefore, the Agency has concluded that an analytical method is not required for enforcement purposes for Trichoderma asperellum strain ICC

012.

C. Codex Maximum Residue Level

No Codex maximum residue level exists for Trichoderma asperellum

. VIII. Conclusions

There is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure to the U.S. population, including infants and children, to residues of Trichoderma asperellum strain ICC 012 in or on all food and feed commodities. This includes all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable information. The Agency has arrived at this conclusion because, as discussed in Unit III. no toxicity or pathogenicity to mammals has been observed in test animals. IX. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

This final rule establishes an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance under section 408(d) of FFDCA in response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from review under Executive Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this final rule has been exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this final rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This final rule does not contain any information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq ., nor does it require any special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).

Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis of a petition under section 408(d) of FFDCA, such as the exemption in this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq .) do not apply.

This final rule directly regulates growers, food processors, food handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this action alter the relationships or distribution of power and responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions of section 408(n)(4) of FFDCA. As such, the Agency has determined that this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or tribal governments, on the relationship between the national government and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this final rule. In addition, this final rule does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public Law 104–4).

This action does not involve any technical standards that would require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104–113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). X. Congressional Review Act

The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq ., generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of this final rule in the Federal Register . This final rule is not

a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Dated: February 4, 2010. Steven Bradbury, Acting Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.

■ Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:

**PART 180—[AMENDED]**

■ 1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.

■ 2. Section 180.1294 is added to subpart D to read as follows:

**§ 180.1294 Trichoderma asperellum strain ICC 012; exemption from the requirement of**  **a tolerance.**

Trichoderma asperellum strain ICC 012 is exempted from the requirement of a tolerance in or on all food and feed commodities when applied pre-harvest and used in accordance with good agricultural practices.

[FR Doc. 2010–3854 Filed 3–2–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–S**

**FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION** 

**47 CFR Part 73**

**[DA 10–196, MB Docket No. 07–296, RM– 11412]** 

**FM TABLE OF ALLOTMENTS, French Lick, Indiana, and Irvington, Kentucky.** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Communications Commission.

**ACTION :**  Final rule.

**SUMMARY :**  The staff grants a rulemaking petition filed by L. Dean Spencer to allot FM Channel 261A at Irvington, Kentucky, as a first local service. To accommodate this new allotment, the staff modifies the license of Station WFLQ(FM), French Lick, Indiana, to specify operation on Channel 229A in lieu of Channel 261A.

**DATES :**  Effective March 15, 2010.

**ADDRESSES :**  Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20554.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Andrew J. Rhodes, Media Bureau, (202)

418–2180.