# L_2020170EN.01001701.xml

| 2.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 170/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 170/17

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2020/727

of 29 May 2020

terminating the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of continuous filament glass fibre products originating in Bahrain and Egypt

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (1) (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 5 thereof,

Whereas:

1.   PROCEDURE

PROCEDURE

1.1.   Initiation

Initiation

| (1) | On 3 May 2019, the European Commission initiated an anti-dumping investigation with regard to imports into the European Union of continuous filament glass fibre products (‘GFR’) originating in Bahrain and Egypt (the ‘countries concerned’) pursuant to Article 5 of the basic Regulation. It published a Notice of Initiation in the Official Journal of the European Union (2) (the ‘Notice of Initiation’). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 3 May 2019, the European Commission initiated an anti-dumping investigation with regard to imports into the European Union of continuous filament glass fibre products (‘GFR’) originating in Bahrain and Egypt (the ‘countries concerned’) pursuant to Article 5 of the basic Regulation. It published a Notice of Initiation in the Official Journal of the European Union (2) (the ‘Notice of Initiation’).

Official Journal of the European Union

2

| (2) | The Commission initiated the investigation following a complaint lodged on 21 March 2019 by the European Glass Fibre Producers Association (‘the complainant’ or ‘APFE’) on behalf of producers representing more than 25 % of total Union production. Producers representing 71 % of the total Union production of continuous filament glass fibre products supported the complaint. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Commission initiated the investigation following a complaint lodged on 21 March 2019 by the European Glass Fibre Producers Association (‘the complainant’ or ‘APFE’) on behalf of producers representing more than 25 % of total Union production. Producers representing 71 % of the total Union production of continuous filament glass fibre products supported the complaint.

1.2.   Investigation period and period considered

Investigation period and period considered

| (3) | The investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 April 2018 to 31 March 2019 (the ‘investigation period’ or the ‘IP’). The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of injury covered the period from 1 January 2016 to the end of the investigation period (the ‘period considered’). |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 April 2018 to 31 March 2019 (the ‘investigation period’ or the ‘IP’). The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of injury covered the period from 1 January 2016 to the end of the investigation period (the ‘period considered’).

1.3.   Interested parties

Interested parties

| (4) | In the Notice of Initiation, interested parties were invited to contact the Commission in order to participate in the investigation. In addition, the Commission specifically informed the complainant, other known Union producers, the known exporting producers, the known importers, suppliers and users, traders, as well as associations known to be concerned about the initiation of the investigation and invited them to participate. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

In the Notice of Initiation, interested parties were invited to contact the Commission in order to participate in the investigation. In addition, the Commission specifically informed the complainant, other known Union producers, the known exporting producers, the known importers, suppliers and users, traders, as well as associations known to be concerned about the initiation of the investigation and invited them to participate.

| (5) | Interested parties had an opportunity to comment on the initiation of the investigation and to request a hearing with the Commission and/or the Hearing Officer in trade proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

Interested parties had an opportunity to comment on the initiation of the investigation and to request a hearing with the Commission and/or the Hearing Officer in trade proceedings.

1.4.   Sampling

Sampling

| (6) | In its Notice of Initiation, the Commission stated that it might sample interested parties in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

In its Notice of Initiation, the Commission stated that it might sample interested parties in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.

1.4.1.   Sampling of Union producers

Sampling of Union producers

| (7) | In its Notice of Initiation, the Commission stated that it had provisionally selected a sample of Union producers. The Commission selected the sample on the basis of the highest representative quantity of production which could reasonably be investigated within the time available. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

In its Notice of Initiation, the Commission stated that it had provisionally selected a sample of Union producers. The Commission selected the sample on the basis of the highest representative quantity of production which could reasonably be investigated within the time available.

| (8) | No comments on the sample selection were received. |
| --- | --- |

(8)

No comments on the sample selection were received.

1.4.2.   Sampling of unrelated importers

Sampling of unrelated importers

| (9) | To decide whether sampling was necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the Commission asked unrelated importers to provide the information specified in the Notice of Initiation. |
| --- | --- |

(9)

To decide whether sampling was necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the Commission asked unrelated importers to provide the information specified in the Notice of Initiation.

| (10) | Given that only two unrelated importers provided completed sampling forms, sampling was not applied. |
| --- | --- |

(10)

Given that only two unrelated importers provided completed sampling forms, sampling was not applied.

1.4.3.   Sampling of exporting producers in Bahrain and Egypt

Sampling of exporting producers in Bahrain and Egypt

| (11) | The Commission did not resort to sampling in relation to exporting producers in Bahrain and Egypt as there is only one exporting producer in each country. |
| --- | --- |

(11)

The Commission did not resort to sampling in relation to exporting producers in Bahrain and Egypt as there is only one exporting producer in each country.

1.4.4.   Questionnaire replies and verification visits

Questionnaire replies and verification visits

| (12) | The Commission sent questionnaires to the two exporting producers, to the three sampled Union producers, and to the two unrelated importers. A questionnaire was provided for users to complete, if they so wished, rather than making a submission. |
| --- | --- |

(12)

The Commission sent questionnaires to the two exporting producers, to the three sampled Union producers, and to the two unrelated importers. A questionnaire was provided for users to complete, if they so wished, rather than making a submission.

| (13) | The Commission received questionnaire replies from both exporting producers, all sampled Union producers and both unrelated importers. The Commission also received questionnaire replies from two users. |
| --- | --- |

(13)

The Commission received questionnaire replies from both exporting producers, all sampled Union producers and both unrelated importers. The Commission also received questionnaire replies from two users.

| (14) | The Commission sought and verified all the information deemed necessary for a determination of dumping, resulting injury and Union interest. |
| --- | --- |

(14)

The Commission sought and verified all the information deemed necessary for a determination of dumping, resulting injury and Union interest.

| (15) | The methodology and correctness of the data gathered by the complainants for the purposes of the macroeconomic indicators was subject to a verification visit under Article 16 of the basic Regulation carried out at the premises of the lawyers of the complainants. |
| --- | --- |

(15)

The methodology and correctness of the data gathered by the complainants for the purposes of the macroeconomic indicators was subject to a verification visit under Article 16 of the basic Regulation carried out at the premises of the lawyers of the complainants.

| (16) | Verification visits under Article 16 of the basic Regulation were carried out at the premises of the following companies: | Union producers and related companies:






  — | 3B Fibreglass, Battice, Belgium, |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

(16)

Verification visits under Article 16 of the basic Regulation were carried out at the premises of the following companies:

Union producers and related companies:

—

3B Fibreglass, Battice, Belgium,

| — | Johns Manville Slovakia a.s., Trnava, Slovak Republic, |
| --- | --- |

—

Johns Manville Slovakia a.s., Trnava, Slovak Republic,

| — | European Owens Corning Fibreglass SPRL, Watermael-Boitsfort, Belgium |
| --- | --- |

—

European Owens Corning Fibreglass SPRL, Watermael-Boitsfort, Belgium

| | Unrelated importers in the Union:






  — | Euroresins UK Limited, Ellesmere Port, UK, |
| --- | --- | --- |

Unrelated importers in the Union:

—

Euroresins UK Limited, Ellesmere Port, UK,

| — | Helm AG, Hamburg, Germany |
| --- | --- |

—

Helm AG, Hamburg, Germany

| | Unrelated users in the Union:






  — | Polykemi, Ystad, Sweden, |
| --- | --- | --- |

Unrelated users in the Union:

—

Polykemi, Ystad, Sweden,

| — | Company A (3) |
| --- | --- |

—

Company A (3)

3

| | Exporting producer in Egypt and related companies:






  — | Jushi Group: |
| --- | --- | --- |

Exporting producer in Egypt and related companies:

—

Jushi Group:

| — | Jushi Egypt for Fiberglass Industry S.A.E., Egypt, |
| --- | --- |

—

Jushi Egypt for Fiberglass Industry S.A.E., Egypt,

| — | Jushi France SAS, France, |
| --- | --- |

—

Jushi France SAS, France,

| — | Jushi Italia srl, Italy, |
| --- | --- |

—

Jushi Italia srl, Italy,

| — | Jushi Spain SA, Spain |
| --- | --- |

—

Jushi Spain SA, Spain

| | Exporting producer in Bahrain and related companies:






  — | CPIC Group






  — | CPIC Abahsain Fiberglass W.L.L., Bahrain, |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

Exporting producer in Bahrain and related companies:

—

CPIC Group

—

CPIC Abahsain Fiberglass W.L.L., Bahrain,

| — | CPIC Europe B.V., the Netherlands. |
| --- | --- |

—

CPIC Europe B.V., the Netherlands.

2.   PRODUCT CONCERNED AND LIKE PRODUCT

PRODUCT CONCERNED AND LIKE PRODUCT

2.1.   Product under investigation

Product under investigation

| (17) | The product subject to this investigation is chopped glass fibre strands, of a length of not more than 50 mm (‘chopped strands’); glass fibre rovings, excluding glass fibre rovings which are impregnated and coated and have a loss on ignition of more than 3 % (as determined by the ISO Standard 1887) (‘rovings’); and mats made of glass fibre filaments excluding mats of glass wool (‘mats’), (‘the product under investigation’). The product under investigation is known as ‘glass fibre reinforcements’ or ‘GFR’. |
| --- | --- |

(17)

The product subject to this investigation is chopped glass fibre strands, of a length of not more than 50 mm (‘chopped strands’); glass fibre rovings, excluding glass fibre rovings which are impregnated and coated and have a loss on ignition of more than 3 % (as determined by the ISO Standard 1887) (‘rovings’); and mats made of glass fibre filaments excluding mats of glass wool (‘mats’), (‘the product under investigation’). The product under investigation is known as ‘glass fibre reinforcements’ or ‘GFR’.

| (18) | The product concerned is the product under investigation originating in Bahrain and Egypt. |
| --- | --- |

(18)

The product concerned is the product under investigation originating in Bahrain and Egypt.

| (19) | The product concerned is currently falling under CN codes 7019 11 00, ex 7019 12 00, 7019 31 00 (TARIC codes 7019120022, 7019120025, 7019120026 and 7019120039). |
| --- | --- |

(19)

The product concerned is currently falling under CN codes 7019 11 00, ex 7019 12 00, 7019 31 00 (TARIC codes 7019120022, 7019120025, 7019120026 and 7019120039).

2.2.   Like product

Like product

| (20) | The investigation showed that the following products have the same basic physical, chemical, and technical characteristics as well as the same basic uses:






  (a) | the product concerned; |
| --- | --- | --- |

(20)

The investigation showed that the following products have the same basic physical, chemical, and technical characteristics as well as the same basic uses:

(a)

the product concerned;

| (b) | the product produced and sold on the domestic market of Bahrain and Egypt; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the product produced and sold on the domestic market of Bahrain and Egypt;

| (c) | the product produced and sold in the Union by the Union industry. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

the product produced and sold in the Union by the Union industry.

| (21) | The Commission decided that, for the purpose of this investigation, those products are therefore like products within the meaning of Article 2(c) of the basic Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(21)

The Commission decided that, for the purpose of this investigation, those products are therefore like products within the meaning of Article 2(c) of the basic Regulation.

3.   PROCEDURE

PROCEDURE

| (22) | In its letter to the Commission of 19 March 2020 the complainant withdrew its complaint. |
| --- | --- |

(22)

In its letter to the Commission of 19 March 2020 the complainant withdrew its complaint.

| (23) | In accordance with Article 9(1) of the basic Regulation, when the complainant withdraws its complaint, the proceeding may be terminated unless such termination would not be in the Union interest. |
| --- | --- |

(23)

In accordance with Article 9(1) of the basic Regulation, when the complainant withdraws its complaint, the proceeding may be terminated unless such termination would not be in the Union interest.

| (24) | The Commission considered that the anti-dumping proceeding should be terminated since the investigation had not brought to light any considerations demonstrating that such termination would not be in the Union interest. |
| --- | --- |

(24)

The Commission considered that the anti-dumping proceeding should be terminated since the investigation had not brought to light any considerations demonstrating that such termination would not be in the Union interest.

| (25) | Interested parties were informed accordingly and were given an opportunity to comment. The Commission received no comments which would lead to the conclusion that such termination would not be in the Union interest. |
| --- | --- |

(25)

Interested parties were informed accordingly and were given an opportunity to comment. The Commission received no comments which would lead to the conclusion that such termination would not be in the Union interest.

| (26) | The Commission therefore concludes that the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports into the Union of GFR originating in Bahrain and Egypt should be terminated. |
| --- | --- |

(26)

The Commission therefore concludes that the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports into the Union of GFR originating in Bahrain and Egypt should be terminated.

| (27) | This Decision is in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 15(1) of the basic Regulation, |
| --- | --- |

(27)

This Decision is in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 15(1) of the basic Regulation,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports into the Union of chopped glass fibre strands, of a length of not more than 50 mm (‘chopped strands’); glass fibre rovings, excluding glass fibre rovings which are impregnated and coated and have a loss on ignition of more than 3 % (as determined by the ISO Standard 1887) (‘rovings’); and mats made of glass fibre filaments excluding mats of glass wool (‘mats’), originating in Bahrain and Egypt and currently falling under CN codes 7019 11 00, ex 7019 12 00, 7019 31 00 (TARIC codes 7019120022, 7019120025, 7019120026 and 7019120039), is hereby terminated.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 29 May 2020.

For the Commission

The President

Ursula VON DER LEYEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 151, 3.5.2019, p. 4.

2

(3)  Company A requested anonymity on the grounds that they would expose themselves to a significant risk of commercial retaliation should it be perceived by certain producers to act in a manner that runs counter to their interests.

3

---