alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeBiographies...Anne A. Witkowsky

# 				Anne A. Witkowsky			

															Assistant Secretary						Bureau of Conflict and Stabilization Operations												

				January 10, 2022 -									Present							

Anne Witkowsky was sworn in as the Assistant Secretary for the Bureau of Conflict and Stabilization Operations on January 10, 2022.  Before then, she was most recently a non-resident Senior Democracy Fellow at Freedom House, where she co-directed the joint Freedom House, Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), and McCain Institute Task Force on the U.S. Strategy to Support Democracy and Counter Authoritarianism.  Assistant Secretary Witkowsky previously served in government as Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Stability and Humanitarian Affairs (2014-2016) in the Office of the Under Secretary for Defense for Policy; as Acting Principal Deputy Coordinator in the State Department’s Bureau of Counterterrorism (2012-2013); and as the Bureau of Counterterrorism’s Deputy Coordinator for Homeland Security and Multilateral Affairs (2009-2013).  She also served as Director for Defense Policy and Arms Control on the White House National Security Council staff (1993-2000) and spent her early government career in the Office of the Secretary of Defense for Policy.

Assistant Secretary Witkowsky holds a Bachelor of Arts in Russian and East European studies from Yale University and a Master in Public Administration with a concentration in international security from Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of Government.  She is the recipient of several State Department Superior and Meritorious Honor Awards, the Department of Defense Medal for Distinguished Civilian Service, and the Secretary of Defense Medal for Outstanding Public Service.

Tags

Bureau of Conflict and Stabilization OperationsState Department Official

Back to Top
HomeReports and Guidance – PEPFAR...Annual Reports to Congress on the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief

# 									Annual Reports to Congress on the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief							

The United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief

These reports are prepared by the Office of the United States Global AIDS Coordinator in collaboration with the United States Departments of State (including the United States Agency for International Development), Defense, Commerce, Labor, Health and Human Services (including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Food and Drug Administration, the Health Resources and Services Administration, the National Institutes of Health, and the Office of Global Health Affairs), and the Peace Corps.

### Nineteenth Annual Report to Congress (2023)

When President George W. Bush announced the creation of the U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) in his 2003 State of the Union address, and the U.S. Congress quickly followed by passing the United States Leadership Against HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria Act of 2003 in strong bipartisan fashion, it fundamentally changed the course of public health history.

Since then, the U.S. government, with the strong, unwavering support of the U.S. Congress, has proudly invested nearly $100 billion in the global AIDS response through PEPFAR and the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (Global Fund). On World AIDS Day 2022, President Biden announced that the U.S. government, through PEPFAR, has saved more than 25 million lives, and more than 20 PEPFAR-supported countries have now achieved epidemic control of HIV or reached the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) 90-90-90 HIV treatment targets, even without a vaccine or a cure.

Reaching these goals was virtually unimaginable when PEPFAR began, and a series of other countries are also on pace to attain them soon. These are also critical milestones toward achieving the Sustainable Development Goal 3 target of ending the AIDS epidemic as a public health threat by 2030.

Report – Implementation of Assistance to Combat HIV-AIDS [1 MB]

Supporting Appendices- Implementation of Assistance to Combat HIV-AIDS [5 MB]

>> Reports of Previous Years

Tags

Global HealthThe United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief

Back to Top
§ 129.2 Definitions. For purposes of the Act and for reporting requirements under this Part: ( a ) *United States,* when used in a geographic sense, means the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the territories and possessions of the United States.
( b ) *Foreign,* when used in a geographic sense, means that which is situated outside the United States or which belongs to or is characteristic of a country other than the United States.
( c ) *Person* means any individual, branch, partnership, associated group, association, estate, trust, corporation, or other organization (whether or not organized under the laws of any State), and any government (including a foreign government, the United States Government, a State or local government, and any agency, corporation, financial institution, or other entity or instrumentality thereof, including a government-sponsored agency).
( d ) *United States person* means any person resident in the United States or subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.
( e ) *Foreign person* means any person resident outside the United States or subject to the jurisdiction of a country other than the United States.
( f ) *Foreign parent* means any foreign person who owns or controls, directly or indirectly, 10 percent or more of the voting securities of an incorporated United States business enterprise, or an equivalent interest in an unincorporated United States business enterprise.
( g ) *Reporter* means a United States person required to file a report.
( h ) *Foreign official institution* means central governments of foreign countries and their possessions, including recognized central banks of issue.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

###### Editorial Note on Part 363

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 363 appear at 70 FR 57433, Sept. 30, 2005, 70 FR 57442, Sept. 30, 2005, and 75 FR 70815, Nov. 19, 2010.

#### § 363.34 What happens if an owner becomes incompetent after opening a TreasuryDirect ® account?

If we receive notice that the owner of a TreasuryDirect account has become incompetent, we will suspend all transactions in the account until we establish the authority of another person to act in his or her behalf.

[67 FR 64286, Oct. 17, 2002, as amended at 68 FR 24807, May 8, 2003]
```

[House Document 107-35]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

                                     

107th Congress, 1st Session - - - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 107-35

 
                       AN IMMEDIATE HELPING HAND

                               __________

                             COMMUNICATION

                                  from

                   THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

                              transmitting

   A REPORT TO PROVIDE IMMEDIATE ASSISTANCE TO HELP CERTAIN MEDICARE 
                  BENEFICIARIES BUY PRESCRIPTION DRUGS

January 30, 2001.--Referred jointly to the Committees on Ways and Means 
           and Energy and Commerce, and ordered to be printed
                                           The White House,
                                      Washington, January 29, 2001.
Hon. J. Dennis Hastert,
Speaker of the House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
    Dear Mr. Speaker: Enclosed please find the blueprint for my 
program to provide immediate assistance to help certain 
Medicare beneficiaries buy prescription drugs. I look forward 
to working with the Congress to enact these principles into law 
and to working together on comprehensive Medicare reform.
            Sincerely,
                                                    George W. Bush.


```
#### § 15.737-22 Depositions.

Depositions for use at a hearing may, with the consent of the parties in writing or the written approval of the Administrative Law Judge, be taken by either the Director or the respondent or their duly authorized representatives. Depositions may be taken upon oral or written interrogatories, upon not less than 10 days' written notice to the other party before any officer duly authorized to administer an oath for general purposes or before an officer or employee of the Department who is authorized to administer an oath. Such notice shall state the names of the witnesses and the time and place where the depositions are to be taken. The requirement of 10 days' notice may be waived by the parties in writing, and depositions may then be taken from the persons and at the times and places mutually agreed to by the parties. When a deposition is taken upon written interrogatories, any cross-examination shall be upon written interrogatories. Copies of such written interrogatories shall be served upon the other party with the notice, and copies of any written cross-interrogation shall be mailed or delivered to the opposing party at least 5 days before the date of taking the depositions, unless the parties mutually agree otherwise. A party upon whose behalf a deposition is taken must file it with the Administrative Law Judge and serve one copy upon the opposing party. Expenses in the reporting of depositions shall be borne by the party at whose instance the deposition is taken.
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Avanir Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Dated: May 8, 2009
    /s/ Keith A. KatkinKeith A. KatkinPresident and Chief Executive Officer
[Principal Executive Officer]
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-5125

JOHN B. MORRIS and GEORGENE T. MORRIS,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in 07-CV-405, Judge Lawrence

J. Block.

ON MOTION

ORDER 

The appellants move without opposition for a 6-day extension of time, until April

21, 2009, to file their response to the court's November 7, 2008 order.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted.

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Jan Horbaly 

Jan Horbaly

Clerk	FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

APR 17 2009

iRh mew

CLERK

APR 1 7 2009

Date

cc:	Sallie W. Gladney, Esq.

Deborah K. Snyder, Esq.

s20
#### § 1029.400 General.

Loan or finance companies are subject to the recordkeeping requirements set forth and cross referenced in this subpart. Loan or finance companies should also refer to subpart D of part 1010 of this chapter for recordkeeping requirements contained in that subpart which apply to loan or finance companies.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 27, 2014

NO. 03-12-00713-CR

Daniel Joe Hernandez, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 167TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. The 

appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 27, 2014

NO. 03-12-00714-CR

Daniel Joe Hernandez, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 167TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. The 

appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
BATHYMETRIC MAP

Ree mos ate mtes ling thre me remind te Se Meme Chere bemooe
Fe tee mary oe omaed Sea MOE Crd ogreahn enter upwienented be bere
Fagen ems bom tr ferent aw cea MOT Peaageantoe hes sa lane
=

errr Fomeerae Meme Gh Feo 6 RIE mee H4H4 1 we es mt te

nee ote fete rena on a hem Meret i
re Howry on auare ot MM Show Conner trod free Prva

The peomectons we aa ae aut ba Peds Lome furan tech prpeery ate
2 EEL Gre Renee Beer eeeare bem Annet rane ba

— ae
=

ta

reseseeaaiazsinits | tf

ALASKA PENINSULA
TRINITY ISLANDS

Pobbahed et Woxhingron, OC
US DEPARTMENT OF COMmMEICE

NANOMAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSIERIC ADMINISTRATION
(RATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE

W987
BAINeMENNE CONTOUE INTEREALS 90 METERL TD 200 wehTHE SAT

‘SUPTLEMENTED Be 3 sR WWTHRVNLS THEDICE Bt mS 11 MAAN an
FI MLM EAM 1 make na

DATUM. ahs LOWEN LOW watt

Seve 125,000

TRINITY ISLANDS
NOS NO 5-7
#### ACTON LIMITED, a British Virgin Islands corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ethlyn E. HARSH, as Executrix of Harsh Estate on behalf of Edward J. Harsh, deceased, the heirs, beneficiaries, and devisees of Edward J. Harsh, deceased; The Edward J. Harsh Family Trust, under Trust Agreement dated 08/22/77; Nevada National Bank; Gary Michael O’Brien; Anita O’Brien, a/k/a Anita Gross, a/k/a Anita LeClerq; United States of America, the Internal Revenue Service, and any and all other persons unknown claiming any estate, right, title, interest or lien in the real property described in the complaint in the above entitled action, or any cloud upon Plaintiffs title thereto. Defendants-Appellees.

No. 99-16608.

D.C. No. CV-95-00472-HDM/RAM.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 2001.*

Decided Feb. 23, 2001.

Before ALARCÓN, KOZINSKI, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel finds this case appropriate for submission without oral argument pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

The district court properly granted summary judgment to the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) in the Nevada quiet title action brought by Acton Limited (“Acton”). Even assuming that the original assignment from Edward and Ethlyn Harsh to the Edward J. Harsh Family Trust (the “Trust”) described the land sales contract with Gary and Anita O’Brien (the “O’Brien Contract”), it conveyed only a “beneficial interest” in such contract. This term refers to the “profit, benefit or advantage resulting from a contract or the ownership of an estate, as distinct from legal ownership or control.” Black’s Law Dictionary 156 (6th ed. 1990); *see also General Electric Credit Corp. v. Andreen,*74 Nev. 199, 326 P.2d 731, 733 (Nev.1958) (drawing distinction between beneficial in*530terest and legal interest in the context of a conditional sale of personal property). Therefore, pursuant to the assignment, the Trust acquired the right to receive the installment payments under the O’Brien Contract, but the Harshes retained bare legal title in the land.

Although the Trust later assigned all of its “right, title and interest” in the O’Brien Contract to Acton, the Trust could not convey more than it owned, and all it received under the original assignment was the beneficial interest in the contract. As such, the Harshes continued to own legal title to the property at the time the IRS liens were filed, and the IRS was entitled to summary judgment.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                         774
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         162,829
<DEPRECIATION>                                 114,266
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 49,337
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          98,941
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       4,635
<OTHER-SE>                                     (54,239)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   49,337
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               875
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               8,361
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4,542
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (12,028)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (12,028)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (12,028)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .0
        


</TABLE>
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1006

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide housing benefits for

the purchase of residential cooperative apartment units.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 21, 1995

Mrs. MALONEY (for herself, Mr. DAVIS, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. DOYLE, Mr.

FROST, and Mr. ACKERMAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide housing

benefits for the purchase of residential cooperative apartment units.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Housing

5 Fairness Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. RESIDENTIAL COOPERATIVE HOUSING UNITS.

7 (a) LOANS.—Section 3710(a) of title 38, United

8 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the

9 following:
2

•HR 1006 IH

1 ‘‘(12) To purchase residential property in a de2 velopment, project, or structure of a cooperative

3 housing corporation if the development, project, or

4 structure is approved by the Secretary under criteria

5 which the Secretary shall prescribe by regulations.’’.

6 (b) DEFINITION.—Section 3701(b) of such title is

7 amended by adding at the end thereof the following:

8 ‘‘(6)(A) The term ‘residential property’ includes

9 stock or membership in a cooperative housing cor10 poration (as defined in section 216 of the Internal

11 Revenue Code of 1986) the permanent occupancy of

12 the dwelling units of which is restricted to members

13 of such corporation where the purchase of such stock

14 or membership will entitle the purchaser to the per15 manent occupancy of one of such units.

16 ‘‘(B) For the purposes of subparagraph (A)—

17 ‘‘(i) the term ‘cooperative housing corpora18 tion’ has the same meaning given such term by

19 section 216 of the Internal Revenue Code of

20 1986;

21 ‘‘(ii) the term ‘property’ includes the dwell22 ing unit in such a cooperative; and
3

•HR 1006 IH

1 ‘‘(iii) the term ‘value of the property’ in2 cludes the appraised value of the dwelling unit

3 in the cooperative housing corporation.’’.

Æ
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

BLAKE JOSEPH CLARK, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 19-0254 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2013-000545-001 DT

The Honorable M. Scott McCoy, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix

By Andrea L. Kever

Counsel for Respondent

Blake Joseph Clark, Buckeye

Petitioner

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Lawrence F. Winthrop, Judge Maria Elena Cruz and 

Judge David B. Gass delivered the decision of the Court.

FILED 3-5-2020
STATE v. CLARK

Decision of the Court

2

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Petitioner Blake Joseph Clark seeks review of the superior 

court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant 

to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is petitioner’s second 

successive petition.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will 

not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction 

relief. State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner’s 

burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying 

the petition for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, 

538, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of 

discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the 

petition for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse 

of discretion.

¶4 We grant review but deny relief.
Home2021 Treaties and Agreements...Andorra (21-222) – Extension of Memorandum of Understanding on the Fulbright Exchange Program

# 									Andorra (21-222) – Extension of Memorandum of Understanding on the Fulbright Exchange Program							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

February 22, 2021

Education

Exchange of notes at Barcelona December 23, 2020 and Andorra la Vella February 22, 2021; entered into force February 22, 2021; with effect from December 31, 2020.

Extension of memorandum of understanding signed February 2, 2015: TIAS 15-1201.
Download Agreement						 [460 KB]

Tags

AndorraEducationFulbright ProgramTreaties

Back to Top
#### § 1028.410 Recordkeeping.

Refer to § 1010.410 of this Chapter.