alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Shawn POORE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Cecil H. UNDERWOOD, Governor; William S. Haines, Warden, Huttonsville Correctional Center; Sandra Ilderton, Chairperson, West Virginia Parole Board; John Rapp; George Sidiropolis; Quewanncoii C. Stephens; Deborah Huck, Parole Board Members, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 00-7036.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 23, 2001.

Decided Feb. 12, 2001.

*156Shawn Poore, pro se.

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Shawn Poore seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his complaint without prejudice as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp.2000). Poore challenges the West Virginia Parole Board’s actions in denying him parole in 1998 and 1999 despite his statutory eligibility.

An inmate has no constitutional right to parole. *Greenholtz v. Inmates of Nebraska Penal & Corr. Complex,*442 U.S. 1, 7, 99 S.Ct. 2100, 60 L.Ed.2d 668 (1979). Federal courts must allow state parole authorities wide discretion. *Franklin v. Shields,*569 F.2d 784, 800 (4th Cir.1977). Even if a parole statute creates a liberty interest, an inmate is entitled to only minimal procedure — at most, a statement of reasons for the denial of parole. *Vann v. Angelone,*73 F.3d 519, 522 (4th Cir.1996). A federal court must not involve itself in “the merits of either the state’s parole statute or its individual parole decisions.” *Id.*Under W.Va.Code Ann. § 62-12-13(a) (Michie 2000), the parole board has discretion to grant parole to those eligible, “whenever it is of the opinion that the best interests of the state and of the inmate will be served.”

Poore received a statement of the reasons that the parole board cited in denying him parole, and was notified of the next date he would be eligible to apply for parole. Thus, the board complied with the *157state statute and provided Poore with all the process to which he was entitled. The district court did not err in dismissing Poore’s complaint. We deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
## U NITED 

## S TATES 

## A IR 

## F ORCE 

## C OURT OF 

## C RIMINAL 

## A PPEALS

________________________ No. ACM 39414

________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee

v. Alexander M. FRESCATORE Senior Airman (E

- 4 ) , U.S. Air Force, Appellant

________________________ Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary

Decided 1 7 December 2018

________________________ Military Judge: Shell y W. Schools

. Approved sentence: Bad

- conduct discharge , confinement for 7 mo nths , and reduction to E

- 1

. Sentence adjudged 24 October 2017 by GCM convened at Holloman Air Force Base, New Mexico

. For App ellant: Major Rebecca J. Otey, USAF; Captain Dustin J. Weisman , USAF. For Appellee: Lieutenant Colonel Joseph J. Kubler, USAF; Mary Ellen Payne , Esquire

. Before HUYGEN, MINK , and POSCH , Appellate Military Judges

.

________________________ This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as precedent under AFCCA Rule o f Practice and Procedure 18.4.

________________________ PER CURIAM :The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’ s substantial rights occurred. ArticlesUnited States v. Frescatore , No. ACM 39414

2 59(a) and 66(c), U niform Code of Military Justice , 10 U.S.C. §§ 85 9(a), 866( c). Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT

CAROL K. JOYCE Clerk of the Court
#### People of Puerto Rico, Plaintiff and Appellee, *v.*Justino Rohena, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 6720.

Argued November 4, 1937.

Decided November 22, 1937.

*302
      *C. Iriarte*and *Hector Gonzalez Blanes*for appellant. *R. A. Gómez, Prosecuting Attorney,*and *Luis Jcmer, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney,*for appellee.

Mr. Justice Travieso

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Justino Rohena was charged with an offense of abandonment of minors, consisting in his having failed to provide necessary food, clothing, and medical attention for his alleged daughter Maria Antonia, without lawful excuse for such abandonment. As- his defense he averred that he was not the father of the child in question. The District Court of San Juan found him guilty and sentenced him to 15 days, in jail, suspending the sentence, however, so long as the defendant should pay $1.50 weekly to his alleged child. The defendant appealed, assigning as error that the lower court had found in its judgment that the defendant is the father of the child, notwithstanding the fact that such .relationship had not been recognized in an authentic document, or previously established in an action for the recognition of such minor as the natural daughter of the defendant.

Appellant’s principal contention is that no. one.may be. convicted of an offense of abandonment of minors (Penal Code, sec. 263), unless the relationship of father and natpral child between the defendant and the minor has not been previously established by judgment in a proper filiation proceeding.

We do no.t agree with this -contention of the appellant. The . fact, of parentage,- that is, .the. .relationship of father and natural, child which may exist between the defendant and the minor María Antonia,, is -a f-act which-,could *303have been shown in this criminal proceeding. See: Sections 128 and 129 of the Civil Code (ed. 1930).

In this case, the evidence offered by the prosecuting attorney consisted in the testimony of the mother of the child and of the child herself. Such testimony is clearly insufficient to show the relationship of parent and child between the defendant and the minor Maria Antonia.

We are in agreement with the Prosecuting Attorney that the record before us does not present a case in which the guilt of the defendant appears as a fact established beyond a reasonable doubt.

The judgment appealed from must be reversed.

Mr. Justice Wolf concurs in the result.

Mr. Justice Córdova Dávila took no part in the decision of this case.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,958
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,552
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (103)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         110,253
<DEPRECIATION>                                (67,439)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  63,098
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         25,553
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,636
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    63,098
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,193
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,958
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    46
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,526
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,066
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,066
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,066
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16
        

</TABLE>
BATHYMETRIC MAP

Manebes of Woven
US. DEPARTMENT OF

sarinnwernss roOR NLS nO 2a METER. DLT
SUP DOE 5 Th 5 METER: TO tank
auth OFF UPR BMENEHL) WY 16 Ma HnPRIOTAG

Dana GU COAST Low Watte

suririens metcaICe MEECIOM
Seve 1.290000

GULF OF MEXICO
HOWELL HOOK

HOWELL HOOK
NOS NG 16-9
§ 33.124 State reporting requirements. ( a ) *Quarterly reports.* A State must submit quarterly reports to the Secretary of Health and Human Services in accordance with the terms and conditions of the State's section 1332 waiver. These quarterly reports must include, but are not limited to, reports of any ongoing operational challenges and plans for and results of associated corrective actions.
( b ) *Annual reports.* A State must submit an annual report to the Secretary of Health and Human Services documenting all of the following: ( 1 ) The progress of the section 1332 waiver.
( 2 ) Data on compliance with section 1332(b)(1)(A) through (D) of the Affordable Care Act.
( 3 ) A summary of the annual post-award public forum, held in accordance with § 33.120(c), including all public comments received at such forum regarding the progress of the section 1332 waiver and action taken in response to such concerns or comments.
( 4 ) Other information consistent with the State's approved terms and conditions.
( c ) *Submitting and publishing annual reports.* A State must submit a draft annual report to the Secretary of Health and Human Services no later than 90 days after the end of each waiver year, or as specified in the waiver's terms and conditions. ( 1 ) Within 60 days of receipt of comments from the Secretary of Health and Human Services, a State must submit to the Secretary of Health and Human Services a final annual report for the waiver year.
( 2 ) The draft and final annual reports are to be published on a State's public Web site within 30 days of submission to and approval by the Secretary of Health and Human Services, respectively.
NO. 12-15-00169-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT TYLER

EARL ANDERSON, CARRIE BELL SCOTT, SHARON ANDERSON, 

EVANCE ANDERSON, BILL BURTON, WILLIE MAE ANDERSON

AND JERRY J. ANDERSON (SMITH),

Appellants,

V.

ROBERT LOUIS DURHAM AND FRANK L. ZELLERS, III,

Appellees

______________________________________________________________

 On appeal from the 173 District Court rd

Henderson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012A-0662 

______________________________________________________________

APPELLANTS’ SUPPLEMENT TO APPELLANTS’ BRIEF

______________________________________________________________

COME NOW APPELLANTS, EARL ANDERSON, ET AL, and file their

supplement to Appellants’ Brief as follows:

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

Certificate of Compliance with Type-Volume Limitation, 

Typeface Requirements, and Type-Style Requirements

1. This brief complies with the type-volume limitation of

TEX. R. APP. P 9.4(i)(3) because

 [x] this brief contains ____2181__ words, excluding

the parts of the brief exempted by TEX. R. APP. P., or

ACCEPTED

12-15-00169CV

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

8/31/2015 4:17:18 PM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 8/31/2015 4:17:18 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
 

2. This brief complies with the page requirements of

TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4(i)(2) because:

 [x] this brief contains 10 pages.

Respectfully submitted,

__________________________________

LANA JOHNSON

Texas Bar No. 10763650

P. O. Box 816325

Dallas, TX 75381-6325

Tel. (903) 646-0672

Fax. (866) 447-7148

Attorney for Appellants

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on August 30, 2015 a true and correct copy of 

SUPPLEMENT TO APPELLANT'S BRIEF was served by e-mail on the Cope

Law Firm.

_________________________________

LANA JOHNSON

APPELLANTS’ SUPPLEMENT Page 2

 Lana Johnson Lana Johnson
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 351.34 What are the maturity periods of Series EE bonds with issue dates of May 1, 2005, or thereafter? ( a ) *Original maturity.* Bonds reach original maturity at 20 years after the issue date.
( b ) *Final maturity.* Bonds reach final maturity at 30 years after the issue date. Bonds cease to earn interest at final maturity.
[70 FR 17288, Apr. 9, 2005]
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 159 (Wednesday, August 19, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41881-41882]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19829]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-1554-000]


RMH Energy, LP; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based 
Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

August 12, 2009.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
RMH Energy. LP's application for market-based rate authority, with an 
accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a 
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is September 1, 2009.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the

[[Page 41882]]

FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic 
service, persons with Internet access who will eFile a document and/or 
be listed as a contact for an intervenor must create and validate an 
eRegistration account using the eRegistration link. Select the eFiling 
link to log on and submit the intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#12545740515d7c7e7b7c77416762627d606652747760713c757d64"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="165053445559787a7f787345636666796462567073647538717960">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-19829 Filed 8-18-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

**Scientific Investigations Report 2008–5159**

**U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY  Scientific Investigations Report 2008–5159**

# Preliminary Volcano-Hazard Assessment for Gareloi Volcano, Gareloi Island, Alaska

**By Michelle L. Coombs, Robert G. McGimsey, and Brandon L. Browne**

## Summary of Volcano Hazards at Gareloi Volcano

Gareloi Volcano (178.794°W and 51.790°N) is located on Gareloi Island in the Delarof Islands group of the Aleutian Islands, about 2,000 kilometers west-southwest of Anchorage and about 150 kilometers west of Adak, the westernmost community in Alaska. This small (about 8×10 kilometer) volcano has been one of the most active in the Aleutians since its discovery by the Bering expedition in the 1740s, though because of its remote location, observations have been scant and many smaller eruptions may have gone unrecorded. Eruptions of Gareloi commonly produce ash clouds and lava flows. Scars on the flanks of the volcano and debris-avalanche deposits on the adjacent seafloor indicate that the volcano has produced large landslides in the past, possibly causing tsunamis. Such events are infrequent, occurring at most every few thousand years. The primary hazard from Gareloi is airborne clouds of ash that could affect aircraft. In this report, we summarize and describe the major volcanic hazards associated with Gareloi.

## Contents

Summary of Volcano Hazards at Gareloi Volcano  Introduction  Physical Setting and Features of Gareloi Volcano  Eruptive Activity of Gareloi Volcano  Volcano Hazards at Gareloi Volcano  Event Frequency and Risk at Gareloi Volcano  Hazard Warning and Mitigation  Acknowledgments  References CitedGlossary

This report is available online in Portable Document Format (PDF). If you do not  have the **Adobe Reader**, it is available for free download from Adobe Systems  Incorporated.

#### **Download  the report (PDF, 3.6 MB)**

#### **Download Plate 1 (PDF, 1.25 MB)**

Document Accessibility:  Adobe Systems Incorporated has information about PDFs and the visually impaired.  This information provides tools to help make PDF files accessible. These tools  convert Adobe PDF documents into HTML or ASCII text, which then can be read  by a number of common screen-reading programs that synthesize text as audible  speech. In addition, an accessible version of Adobe Reader 8.0 for Windows  (English only), which contains support for screen readers, is available. These  tools and the accessible reader may be obtained free from Adobe at **Adobe  Access**.

Send questions or comments about this report to the author, **M.L. Coombs**, (907) 786-7403.

For more information about USGS activities in Alaska, visit the **USGS Alaska Science Center home page**.

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey    URL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2008/5159    Page Contact Information: Publications Team    Page Last Modified:    Thursday, 10-Jan-2013 18:54:01 EST
# {:"AA-2DI 0 --Ol'l{ Contacts. With whom outside the FAA hasthis proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted 

## Date Response N:1tio1l31

Business Aircraft .-\ssociation Eli CoW 8/4/09 

## - Regional Airline Association D3••.. C Loiterer 8/4/09 

## - Aircraft Owners & ]'ilots AssociatlOIl Roberl Hackman 8/4/09

- 

### ATA Craig Fabhm 8/4/09

- 

### ATA !VILopez 8/4/09 

## - 09/29/06
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of BMW Vehicle Lease Trust 2017-1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);
  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
          under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
  4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation
          AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and
 5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be
          included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
          described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.
    
 BMW FINANCIAL SERVICES NA, LLCBy:
          /s/ Stefan KramerName:
          Stefan KramerTitle:
          Vice President – Finance & CFO
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 315.42 Nonreceipt or loss of check issued in payment.

If a Treasury check in payment of a bond surrendered for redemption is not received within a reasonable time or is lost after receipt, notice should be given to the same agency to which the bond was surrendered for payment. The notice should give the date the bond was surrendered for payment, and describe the bond by series, denomination, serial number, and registration, including the taxpayer identifying number of the owner.
§ 33.112 State public notice requirements. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) Prior to submitting an application for a new section 1332 waiver to the Secretary of Health and Human Services for review and consideration, a State must provide a public notice and comment period sufficient to ensure a meaningful level of public input for the application for a section 1332 waiver.
( 2 ) Such public notice and comment period shall include, for a State with one or more Federally-recognized Indian tribes within its borders, a separate process for meaningful consultation with such tribes.
( b ) *Public notice and comment period.* The State shall make available at the beginning of the public notice and comment period, through its Web site or other effective means of communication, and shall update as appropriate, a public notice that includes all of the following: ( 1 ) A comprehensive description of the application for a section 1332 waiver to be submitted to the Secretary of Health and Human Services including information and assurances related to all statutory requirements and other information consistent with guidance provided by the Secretary and the Secretary of Health and Human Services.
( 2 ) Information relating to where copies of the application for a section 1332 waiver are available for public review and comment.
( 3 ) Information relating to how and where written comments may be submitted and reviewed by the public, and the timeframe during which comments will be accepted.
( 4 ) The location, date, and time of public hearings that will be convened by the State to seek public input on the application for a section 1332 waiver.
( c ) *Public hearings.* ( 1 ) After issuing the public notice and prior to submitting an application for a new section 1332 waiver, a State must conduct public hearings regarding the State's application.
( 2 ) Such public hearings shall provide an interested party the opportunity to learn about and comment on the contents of the application for a section 1332 waiver.
( 3 ) Such public hearings shall be conducted in an in-person, virtual (that is, one that uses telephonic, digital, and/or web-based platforms), or hybrid (that is, one that provides for both in-person and virtual attendance) format.
( d ) *Submission of initial application.* After the State public notice and comment period has concluded, the State may submit an application to the Secretary of Health and Human Services for an initial waiver in accordance with the requirements set forth in § 33.108.
[77 FR 11715, Feb. 27, 2012, as amended at 89 FR 26418, Apr. 15, 2024]