alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Opinion issued April 5 , 2022

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 22 - 001 36 - CR NO. 01 - 22 - 001 37 - CR NO. 01 - 22 - 001 38 - CR NO. 01 - 22 - 001 39 - CR NO. 01 - 22 - 001 40 - CR

——————————— IN RE CASEY RAY BROWN , Relat or Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

MEMORANDU M OPINION2

Casey Ray Brown, acting pro se, has filed an original petition for writ of habeas corpus seeking bail reduction in the underlying cases
. 1 We dismiss the petition for want of jurisdiction. In criminal matters, this Court ’ s habeas corpus jurisdiction is appellate only, and we do not have original habeas corpus jurisdiction. See T EX . G OV ’ T C ODE § 22.221(d); Ex parte Denby , 627 S.W.2d 435, 435 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 1981, orig. proceeding); see also Chavez v. State , 132 S.W.3d 509, 510 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, no pet.) (citing T EX . G OV ’ T C ODE § 22.221 ) (“A court of appeals does not have original habeas corpus jurisdiction in felony cases.”). Original jurisdiction to grant a writ of habeas corpus in a criminal case is vested in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the district courts, the county courts, or a judge in those courts. See T EX . C ODE C RIM . P ROC . art. 11; Ex parte Hawkins , 885 S.W.2d 586, 588 (Tex. App.

—

El Paso 1994, orig. proceeding) . We thus lack jurisdiction over this attempt to seek habeas relief directly from this Court. See , e.g., In re B uchanan , No. 01

- 19

- 00378

- CR, 2019 WL 3127092, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] July 16, 2019, orig. proceeding) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (dismissing

1 No record was filed with the petition. The underlying case s are The State of Texas v. Casey Ray Brown , cause numbers 1706825, 1711705, 1711718, 1714981, and 1714982, pending in the 208th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Greg Glass presiding.3

petition for writ of habeas corpus because court lacks original habeas corpus jurisdi ction in criminal cases). Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for writ of habeas corpus for want of jurisdiction. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Landau, Hightower, and Rivas

- Molloy
. Do not publish. T EX . R. A PP . P . 47.2(b).
**
**Exhibit 23.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8No. 333-222790) pertaining to the ARMO BioSciences, Inc. 2018 Equity Incentive Plan, the ARMO BioSciences, Inc. 2018 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the ARMO BioSciences, Inc. 2012 Stock Incentive Planof ARMO BioSciences, Inc. of our report dated March 30, 2018, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of ARMO BioSciences, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year endedDecember 31, 2017. 

 
/s/ Ernst & Young LLPRedwood City, CaliforniaMarch 30, 2018**
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jerome Jones, Appellant.

[808 NYS2d 84]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Ohlig, J.), rendered October 30, 1998, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that he was denied a fair trial by the trial court’s questioning of the police witness, whereby testimony was elicited that the officer had prior dealings with the defendant. Upon the defense counsel’s objection, the trial court immediately stopped its questioning. Thereafter, the defendant chose not to move for a mistrial and declined the trial court’s offer for curative instructions to the jury. Accordingly, the issue was not preserved for appellate review *(see People v Etheridge,*160 AD2d 1020 [1990]).

The defendant also contends that the prosecutor improperly introduced evidence of an uncharged crime. To the extent that this issue is preserved for appellate review, any error was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt *(see People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230 [1975]).

The defendant further contends that the trial court improperly denied his request for a missing witness charge. We note that the People cannot raise the issue of untimeliness of the request for the first time on appeal *(see People v Young,*4 AD3d 441 [2004]; *People v Martin,*208 AD2d 770 [1994]; *People v Farrow,*187 AD2d 667 [1992]). Nor may they argue, for the first time on appeal, that the defendant failed to establish that the uncalled witness had knowledge of a material issue, or that the People established that he had no non-cumulative evidence to offer *(see People v Gonzalez,*68 NY2d 424, 430 [1986]; *People v Sims,*226 AD2d 564, 565 [1996]).

However, as the defendant failed to demonstrate that the witness would naturally be expected to provide testimony favorable to the prosecution, the trial court properly denied the request *(see People v Macana,*84 NY2d 173, 177 [1994]; *People v*
      *400
      *Gonzalez, supra*at 428; *People v Farrow, supra*at 667; *cf. People v Jefferson,*281 AD2d 433, 434 [2001]; *People v Creeden,*210 AD2d 422, 423 [1994]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Luciano and Lifson, JJ., concur.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 351.85 May Fiscal Service waive any provision in this part? We may waive or modify any provision of this part in any particular case or class of cases for the convenience of the United States or in order to relieve any person or persons of unnecessary hardship: ( a ) If such action would not be inconsistent with law or equity;
( b ) If it does not impair any material existing rights; and
( c ) If we are satisfied that such action would not subject the United States to any substantial expense or liability.
#### § 54.6011-2 General requirement of return, statement, or list.

Effective for any Form 8928 that is due on or after January 1, 2010, any person liable for tax under section 4980B, 4980D, 4980E, or 4980G of the Code shall file a return with respect to the tax on Form 8928. The return must include the information required by Form 8928 and the instructions issued with respect to it.

[T.D. 9457, 74 FR 45999, Sept. 8, 2009]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 15.1

August 12, 2005

AVANIR Pharmaceuticals
San Diego, California

We have made a review, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States), of the unaudited interim financial
information of AVANIR Pharmaceuticals and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2005 and
for the periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, as indicated in our report dated
August 12, 2005; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on
that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-71276, 33-94370,
333-83089, 333-84183, 333-38094, 333-108716 and 333-125743 on Form S-8 and
Registration Statement Nos. 33-49082, 33-76094, 333-24549, 333-76641, 333-77925,
333-31442, 333-32776, 333-34958, 333-35934, 333-107820, 333-111680, 333-114389,
333-123867, 333-124230 and 333-125979 on Form S-3.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

Yours truly,

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Aug. 13, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey

Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 Re: Amendment to Exemption 11842 ProFly Drones DJ I Inspire This is a request for an amendment to Exemption No. 11842 Regulatory Docket No. FAA

–2015

– 1148 , granted to ProFl y Drones . This amendment will provide for the addition of the DJ I Inspire multirotor sUAS aircraft to the inventory of approved aircraft for use during VLOS operations currentl y covered under Exemption 11842 . The se airframes are commerciall y available to the general public, as are all components used to complete them. In addition, all configurations of these components follow standard, well established practices. No aspect of these aircraft is proprietary to ProFl y Drones in design or manufacture. ProFly Drones requests that the FAA accept the ProFl y Drones Inspire sUAS and issue an amendment to Exemption 11842 allowing operation as set forth therein. DJI Innovations Model Inspire 1 N592GT Inspire Operation manual: http://download.dji innovations.com/downloads/inspire_1/en/Inspire_1_User_Manual_v1.0_en.pdf
HomeAssisted Schools...Quito, Ecuador: Academia Cotopaxi American International School: 2024 Special Needs Profile

# 									Quito, Ecuador: Academia Cotopaxi American International School: 2024 Special Needs Profile							

Special Needs Profile

Office of Overseas Schools

February 29, 2024

## 								School Contact Information							

        -  Tel: +593-2-382-3270 | Overseas Schools Fact Sheet | Acting Regional Education Officer: Mike Emborsky 
        -  E-mail: director@cotopaxi.k12.ec | Website: www.cotopaxi.k12.ec|Special needs information can be found at cotopaxi.k12.ec/es/inclusion . 
        -  Additional details on special needs support at post found on the **School Summary Information Portal**(must have OKTA login to access).  For more information, contact A/OPR/OS (**overseasschools@state.gov** / +1-202-261-8200), MED/CFP Child and Family Program Team (**MEDCFP@state.gov**/ +1-202-663-1815), or the school directly. 

**Download the Special Needs Profile** (Quito- 2024 Special Needs- Ecuador) for this school to learn more about their capability to support students with exceptionalities.

**Academia Cotopaxi American International School**is a private, independent, coeducational American international day school serving students from preschool (beginning at 12 months) through grade 12 for all nationalities. The school was founded in 1959 and is located in the northern part of Quito. The academic year begins in late August and ends in June. The school is accredited by the New England Association of Schools and Colleges as well as by the International Baccalaureate Office and recognized by the Ecuadorian Ministry of Education. The school is a member of the Association of American Schools in South America (AASSA).

*This Fact Sheet is intended to provide general information. Prospective users of the schools may wish to inquire further of A/OPR/OS or contact the school directly for more specific and up-to-the-minute information. Information and statistics are current as of December 2023 and provided by the school.*

NOTE: School situations can change quickly, particularly as schools face cutbacks to learning support programs due to the pandemic, unrest, and economic uncertainty. For the most current information, work with the REO and school. Information in this document was collected by the Department of State’s Office of Overseas Schools directly from the school in December 2023 and shows the availability of services rather than an assessment of the quality of the services. The profile is intended as a jumping off point for a conversation with the REO and school to understand the best fit for your child. Definitions may vary school to school.

Tags

EcuadorOffice of Overseas Schools

Back to Top
Exhibit 15

August 26, 2015

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549

We are aware that Iconix Brand Group, Inc. has incorporated by reference in its Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-128425, 333-137383, 333-139575, 333-146288, 333-159640, and 333-158861) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-184313, 333-27655, 333-49178, 333-68906, 333-75658, 333-127416, 333-138134, and 333-161419) our report dated August 12, 2015, relating to the Company’s unaudited interim consolidated financial statements appearing in its quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2015. Pursuant to Regulation C under the Securities Act of 1933, that report is not considered a part of the registration statement prepared or certified by our firm or a report prepared or certified by our firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act. It should be noted that we have not performed any procedures subsequent to August 12, 2015.

/s/ BDO USA, LLP

New York, New York
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2013-0119 Directorate ID: 2011-SW-034-AD

Helicopter Model: Eurocopter France Model AS350 and AS355 Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 693 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are to prevent a crack in the control lever attachment yokes, loss 

of tail rotor pitch control, and consequently, loss of helicopter control. 

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $37,825 to replace the tail rotor gearbox.

Labor per Helicopter $170 to inspect the tail rotor gearbox casing 

assemblies.

$425 to replace the tail rotor gearbox. 

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $170 to inspect the tail rotor gearbox casing 

assemblies.

$38,250 to replace the tail rotor gearbox. 

Total US Fleet Cost $117,810 to inspect the tail rotor gearbox casing 

assemblies.

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Robert Grant
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 321.12 Redemption value of securities.

The redemption value of each savings security is determined by the terms of its offering and the length of time it has been outstanding. The Bureau of the Fiscal Service determines redemption values for Series A-E bonds, eligible Series EE and I bonds, and savings notes, that should be used in redeeming savings securities.

[63 FR 38042, July 14, 1998]
#### § 31.3121(i)-3 Computation of remuneration for service performed by an individual as a volunteer or volunteer leader within the meaning of the Peace Corps Act.

In the case of an individual performing service in his capacity as a volunteer or volunteer leader within the meaning of the Peace Corps Act (see section 31.3121(p)), the term “wages” shall, subject to the provisions of section 3121(a)(1) (see § 31.3121(a)-1), include as such individual's remuneration for such service only amounts paid pursuant to section 5(c) or section 6(1) of the Peace Corps Act (22 U.S.C. 2501; 75 Stat. 612).

[T.D. 6744, 29 FR 8315, July 2, 1964]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1253 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 290
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1253

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 13, 1995

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

                           December 19, 1995

               Reported by Mr. Chafee, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To rename the San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge as the Don 
          Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SAN FRANCISCO BAY NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE RENAMED AS DON 
              EDWARDS SAN FRANCISCO BAY NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE.

    (a) Refuge Renamed.--The San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge 
(established by the Act entitled ``An Act to provide for the 
establishment of the San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge'', 
approved June 30, 1972 (86 Stat. 399 et seq.)), is hereby renamed and 
shall be known as ``the Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife 
Refuge''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in any statute, rule, regulation, 
Executive order, publication, map, or paper or other document of the 
United States to the San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge is 
deemed to refer to the Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife 
Refuge.
    (c) Conforming Amendment.--The Act entitled ``An Act to provide for 
the establishment of the San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge'', 
approved June 30, 1972 (86 Stat. 399 et seq.), is amended by striking 
``San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge'' each place it appears 
and inserting ``Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife 
Refuge''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 12, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 290

104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1253

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To rename the San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge as the Don 
          Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           December 19, 1995

                       Reported without amendment
```
|    |                                                                                            |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of SEACOR Marine Holdings Inc.; |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. |

|                  |
|------------------|
|                  |  |  |
| Date:            | April 11, 2018 |
|             |
| /s/ Jesus Llorca |
| Name:            | Jesus Llorca |
| Title:           | Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer) |
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of
China Green Agriculture, Inc. (the “Company”), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)
 The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Dated:
November 12, 2009





/s/ Tao LiTao
      LiPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer(principal
      executive officer)





This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
---

Exhibit 99.8

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Erik Mickels, the Chief
Financial Officer of Trilogy International Partners Inc. (the Company), hereby
certify that, to my knowledge:

|1. | The Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended
      December 31, 2016 (the Report) of the Company fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                              

Date: March 27, 2017

Signature: /s/ Erik MickelsErik MickelsSenior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

---