alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Fl  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2016, byand among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, CWCAPITAL ASSETMANAGEMENT LLC, as Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asCertificate Administrator, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asTrustee  and TRIMONT REAL ESTATE ADVISORS, LLC, as Operating Advisor andas Asset Representations Reviewer with respect to Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates  Series 2016-NXS6 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.          Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from October1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and ofits performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and 

 

2.          Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President                       

Wells Fargo Bank 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

Editorial Note on Part 360
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 360 appear at 79 FR 8860, Feb. 14, 2014.

§ 360.63 Payment to a parent or other person on behalf of a minor. ( a ) If the owner of a savings bond is a minor and the form of registration does not indicate that there is a representative of his or her estate, and if the minor is not of sufficient competency to sign the request for payment and to understand the nature of the transaction, payment will be made to either parent with whom the minor resides or to whom legal custody has been granted. If the minor does not reside with either parent, payment will be made to the person who furnishes the chief support for the minor.
( b ) The request must appear on the back of the bond in one of the following forms: ( 1 ) Request by parent: I certify that I am the mother of John C. Jones (with whom he resides) (to whom legal custody has been granted). He is __ years of age and is not of sufficient understanding to make this request. Mary Jones on behalf of John C. Jones
( 2 ) Request by other person:
I certify that John C. Jones does not reside with either parent and that I furnish his chief support. He is __ years of age and is not of sufficient understanding to make this request. Alice Brown, grandmother, on behalf of John C. Jones
Homeland Security Exercise Evaluation

Training

AGENDA

DAY 1: 8:00am-5:00pm

(Registration and Continental Breakfast 7:00 - 8:00)

Section I: Overview of Course and HSEEP

Welcome and Introduction to Exercise Evaluation

Section II: Exercise Evaluation Methodology

Introduction and Purpose of Evaluation

Activity 1 – Understanding Levels of Analysis

Overview of Exercise Evaluation Process

LUNCH

Section III: Data Collection and Analysis Process

Step 1: Plan and Organize the Evaluation

Activity 2 – Evaluation Planning

A: Review exercise documents

B: Determine EEGs for EOC observation

C: Develop observation plan

D: Homework – Study for assigned observation area
DAY 2: 8:00am - 5:00pm

(Continental Breakfast - 7:30am)

Section III: Data Collection and Analysis Process, continued

Step 2: Exercise Observation

Activity 3 – Video Observation

Step 3: Data Analysis

Activity 4 – Data Analysis

LUNCH

Step 3: (cont.) Integrated Analysis

Activity 5 – Integrated Analysis

Step 4: After Action Report

Activity 6 – Part A: Current AAR Formats

Activity 6 – Part B: New AAR Approach

DAY 3: 8:00 am - Noon

(Continental Breakfast - 7:30am)

Section III: Data Collection and Analysis Process, continued

Activity 6 – Part C: AAR Worksheet

Tabletop Exercises

Activity 7 – Tabletop EEGs

Section IV: Improving Preparedness

Course Wrap-up / Feedback
#### § 501.803 Amendment, modification, or revocation.

Except as otherwise provided by law, the provisions of each part of this chapter and any rulings, licenses (whether general or specific), authorizations, instructions, orders, or forms issued thereunder may be amended, modified or revoked at any time.

[63 FR 35809, July 1, 1998]
- Bureau Operations
- About Us

HomeBureau Operations...About Us – Bureau Operations

# 									About Us							

**Bureau Operations**

The Bureau’s operational units and offices, including the Legislative Reference Unit, Congressional Correspondence Unit, and Congressional Travel Office, provide critical support to the Department’s on-going engagement with Congress, promote effective coordination, and facilitate Congressional oversight.

**Legislative Reference Unit**

The Legislative Reference Unit (LRU) oversees the coordination and clearance functions of the Bureau of Legislative Affairs with respect to legislation and reports. The office monitors all significant legislation involving the Department and serves as the liaison in the legislative clearance process, coordinating views between OMB, National Security Council, and other executive agencies. The process used for coordinating views is the Legislative Reference Memorandum (LRM). Items sent through this process include: proposed or draft legislation, executive orders, proclamations, Statements of Administration Policy (SAP), enrolled bills, Administration testimony for Congressional hearings, and reports required by legislative activities. In addition, the LRU is responsible for coordinating and maintaining the system that identifies and tasks reports to Congress, required by law and by legislative history, which are prepared for signature and submission by the Secretary of State or his or her designee(s).

**Congressional Correspondence Unit**

The Congressional Correspondence Unit (CCU) receives and tracks all written correspondence from Members of Congress. The CCU coordinates Questions for the Record (QFRs) for all Department witnesses and assists in the confirmation process for ambassadorial nominations. In addition, the CCU responds to telephone inquiries from congressional offices seeking information related to Department programs, policies, and publications.

**Congressional Travel Office**

The Congressional Travel Office (CTO) facilitates official foreign travel arrangements for Members’ of Congress and their staff. The CTO is responsible for all logistical aspects of Congressional travel including notification to Posts abroad, compilation of itineraries and scheduling.

Back to Top
g

west OF Hawal
UNITED STATES BATHYMETRIC MAP JAGGAR SEAMOUNT

Aaatares at Warhegper DC LOW ERONAL vite

im JAGGAR SEAMOUNT
US DEPARIMENT OF stores) stad (N190156W)
BATHYMETRIC MAP LM122

fatwruriee Content

DTU sand Lever Lhe WA

ts
izes

TaFRR ATOR

i

“CHa OE
UNITED STATES

“|

mslicad Mattel Montes

tne moe remnant athyemtn. samy by She Hen Chm Beret bee

(Ok Srbapagtn ney someones oo PyonageAen Aetna ea teat

beymae cme” tama 1E maert tw BOE meer epee hepssenemned Oy 2 nese:

wns. Sane St meet ee tonto Aes mages TE me here

erry

Ln leoeehadinticateett ete
Let of wm a9 omens Yow map copeees tn net} goaemtee tom oa
Nw cranes hone Ww sereg 0: wages dase terre ot nae wore
see! roca TAs om ge orp roe fe geestie camane antes

a Pe

EeALUAnGN OF SuevtY ACCURACY

sane | whee | aang!

BATHYMETRIC

-
|

wee) eae | doo

ae

OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
MATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSFHERIC ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL OCEAN SURVEY
vers
Prbbehed on Wunbangren. OC

UNITED STALES OUPANTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT

‘MANeHOERTE AURCATDR PROMI
‘Soxe 1.250.000

EAST BREAKS - GULF OF MEXICO

EAST BREAKS

NOS NGI5-)

LOCATION DUGAN

{OCs}
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 6689** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. EVERTON BARTLEY, a/k/a Frederick Alexander Martin, a/k/a John , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte
. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. ( 3:00

- cr - 00210

- FDW

- 4 )

Submitted : September 26, 2013 Decided: September 30, 2013

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Everton Bartley, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Everton Bartley appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

e rror. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Bartley , No. 3:00

- cr - 00210

- FDW

- 4 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 14, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in th e materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Description of Executive Bonus Plan



 Exhibit 10.7 
 Description of Executive Bonus Plan 
 Fiscal Year 2013 Annual Bonus Plan 

The Board of Directors approved a Fiscal Year 2013 Annual Bonus Plan covering Messrs. Wang, Laplante, Kohn, Legall and Day. The target
bonus for Dr. Wang is 50% of his annual base salary. The target bonus for Messrs. Laplante, Kohn, Legall and Day is 30% of their respective annual base salaries. Payouts, if any, are to be determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board
of Directors under the terms of the plan. In making its determination, the Compensation Committee will consider the Company’s performance against revenue and profitability metrics established by the Board of Directors. The Compensation
Committee will also consider each executive’s performance against management objectives. The performance weighting is 60% for the revenue metric, 30% for the profitability metric and 10% for the management objective metrics. On target
performance is intended to result in a payout at target levels. Above target performance is intended to result in payment above target levels, with a maximum payout equal to twice the annual targeted payout. Any annual bonus plan payouts will be
made no later than 2 and one-half months following the end of the Company’s 2013 fiscal year.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996             SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                               0                 115,199
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0               2,043,535
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                   5,790
<INVENTORY>                                          0               4,406,383
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0               6,609,086
<PP&E>                                               0               1,919,890
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0               1,344,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0               9,679,421
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0               1,969,901
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                  27,281
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0               9,679,421
<SALES>                                      2,236,282               6,143,783
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,236,282               6,143,783
<CGS>                                        1,414,224               4,127,099
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,929,025               5,430,361
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                78,113                 139,075
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              70,850                 122,411
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                229,144                 574,347  
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            229,144                 574,347
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   229,144                 574,347
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08                     .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08                     .19
<FN> 
<F1> The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral
part of these statements.
</FN> 
         

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2547 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 2547

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 18, 1995

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the United States courthouse located at 800 Market Street 
 in Knoxville, Tennessee, as the ``Howard H. Baker, Jr. United States 
                             Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 800 Market Street in 
Knoxville, Tennessee, shall be known and designated as the ``Howard H. 
Baker, Jr. United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Howard H. 
Baker, Jr. United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 18 
      (legislative day, December 15), 1995.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

###### Editorial Note on Part 363

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 363 appear at 70 FR 57433, Sept. 30, 2005, 70 FR 57442, Sept. 30, 2005, and 75 FR 70815, Nov. 19, 2010.

#### § 363.176 May a converted savings bond be pledged or used as collateral?

A converted savings bond may not be pledged or used as collateral for the performance of an obligation.
#### Elliott C. Harry, Respondent, against, Edward G. Hilton, Impleaded, &c., Appellant.

(Decided November 17th, 1882.)

A client is responsible for the fees of a stenographer employed by his attorney to take minutes of a proceeding under a suggestion to which the client accedes. Whether or not such proceeding was instituted by him is immaterial.

Appeal from the judgment of a district court in the City of New York.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*Charles W. Seymour,*for appellant.

*Frank P. Slade,*for respondent.

*233Van Brunt, J.

The question involved in this appeal is, whether a client is responsible for stenographer’s fees in a case where such stenographer is employed by attorneys to take the minutes of the proceedings before an auditor, to whom the Surrogate has referred an executor’s account. The counsel for the respondent relies upon the decisions of the courts which held that when an attorney orders notes of a case from a stenographer the client is presumably liable and not the attorney, because the relation of principal and agent exists.

These cases introduce no new rule in the law regarding contracts, but simply enforce an old one. Their significance, however, lies in the fact that, in the decision of these cases, the courts assume that such action upon the part of the attorney is presumably within the scope of the authority conferred upon him when he is retained by his client, and that the attorney has the right to bind his client for any service which may be necessary and proper not only for the preparation of the case for trial, but for the convenient conduct of such trial, and the proceedings thereafter taken *(Covel*v. *Hart,*14 Hun 254).

In the case of the *First National Bank of Cooperstown*v. *Tomajo*(77 N. Y. 476), the right of the attorney to make agreements which enhance the burden and costs of litigation is directly recognized.

We are of the opinion, therefore, that the attorney does bind a client for the payment of stenographer’s fees where he is employed during the progress of a proceeding under a suggestion to which he accedes.

The objection raised to the ruling of the court in excluding the question as to whether the defendant Hilton instituted the proceedings or filed objections to the account is not well taken. The fact that Hilton was attending such accounting by his counsel was conceded. He was attending such accounting by his attorney as a party in interest. He thereby became a party to the proceeding, and it was.immaterial whether he instituted it or not.

The judgment should be affirmed.

*234J. F. Daly, J., concurred.

Judgment affirmed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 28, 2010 

d0621 

Order 

 

June 28, 2010 

140222 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140222 

 COA: 293425 

Wayne CC: 08-004412 

AARON NICHOLAS HERNANDEZ, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 16, 2009 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
HomeBiographies...Jessica Lewis

# 				Jessica Lewis			

															Assistant Secretary						Bureau of Political-Military Affairs												

				September 30, 2021 -									Present							

Jessica Lewis started her tenure as Assistant Secretary of State for Political-Military Affairs in October 2021. Under her leadership, the Bureau has provided over $46 billion in security assistance to Ukraine, dramatically increased grant assistance to transition countries off Russian defense equipment and provided de-mining assistance to Ukraine. In the Indo-Pacific, the PM bureau has implemented new security assistance to Taiwan, with the first provision of grant funding for Taiwan, as well as authorizing billions in foreign military sales. Assistant Secretary Lewis’ team has also strengthened U.S. security relationships in the Indo-Pacific and around the world by negotiating a record number of security cooperation agreements, including in Europe and the Pacific Islands.

Assistant Secretary Lewis also leads the effort to provide seamless defense trade with Australia and UK in the AUKUS agreements through her team’s innovate use of available authorities while working with Congress to create a new statutory basis for AUKUS defense trade. She has led the Department’s efforts to improve the Foreign Military Sales process and is implementing the Department’s FMS 2023 plan.

Prior to her appointment to the State Department, Assistant Secretary Lewis spent nearly 20 years working on Capitol Hill where she served as the Democratic Staff Director of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee from fall 2016 to 2021. From 2007 to 2016, she was the Senior National Security Advisor and Foreign Policy Advisor to Senate Majority/Minority Leader Harry Reid.

Earlier, Assistant Secretary Lewis was the Democratic Staff Director for the Western Hemisphere Subcommittee of the House International Relations Committee. She also worked at the Organization of American States leading education and training programs at Net Corps America.

Assistant Secretary Lewis taught third grade for four years, as well as graduate level classes for teachers at Johns Hopkins University.

Assistant Secretary Lewis received a Master’s in Public Administration from Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of Government and a Master’s in Teaching from Johns Hopkins University. She completed her undergraduate degree at Haverford College.

Tags

Bureau of Political-Military AffairsState Department Official

Back to Top
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 223.5 Business.

A company holding a certificate of authority, or its agent, may only execute (sign or otherwise validate) a surety bond in favor of the United States in a state where it is licensed to do surety business. It need not be licensed in the state or other area in which the principal resides or where the contract is to be performed. The term *other area* includes the District of Columbia, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

[89 FR 48832, June 10, 2024]
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### §§ 359.51-359.52 [Reserved]