alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 215.11 Miscellaneous provisions. Nothing in this agreement shall be deemed: ( a ) To require collection by agencies of the United States of delinquent tax liabilities of Federal employees or members of the Armed Forces, or
( b ) To consent to the application of any provision of law of the State, city or county which has the effect of: ( 1 ) Imposing more burdensome requirements upon the United States than it imposes on other employers, or
( 2 ) Subjecting the United States or any of its officers or employees to any penalty or liability, or
( c ) To consent to procedures for withholding, filing of returns, and payment of the withheld taxes to a State, city or county that do not conform to the usual fiscal practices of agencies, or
( d ) To permit withholding of a city or county tax from the pay of a Federal employee who is not a resident of, or whose regular place of Federal employment is not within, the State in which the city or county is located, unless the employee consents to the withholding, or
( e ) To permit the withholding of city or county income or employment taxes from the pay of members of the Armed Forces of the United States, or
( f ) To allow agencies to accept compensation from a State, city or county for services performed in withholding of State or city or county income or employment taxes.
(Pub. L. 95-365, 92 Stat. 599 (5 U.S.C. 5520))
[42 FR 33731, July 1, 1977, as amended at 44 FR 4670, Jan. 23, 1979. Redesignated at 71 FR 2150, Jan. 13, 2006]
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 340.4 Acceptance as security for public deposits.

The bonds will be acceptable to secure deposits of public moneys.
g

CAUFORMA COAST

UNITED STATES BATHYMETRIC MAP PIONEER CANYON

PIONEER CANYON
(N370123W)

BATHYMETRIC MAP LM135
|EISENHOWERCultural Landscape Report, Volumes 1 and 2NPS Logo                                                                                                                               | EISENHOWERCultural Landscape Report, Volumes 1 and 2 | NPS Logo
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------- | --------
|EISENHOWERCultural Landscape Report, Volumes 1 and 2                                                                                                                                        | NPS Logo                                             
|CULTURAL LANDSCAPE REPORTforEisenhower National Historic Site                                                                                                                               
|book cover                                                                                                                                                                                   | book cover                                           
|Volume 1: Site History, Existing Conditions, and AnalysisVolume 2: Treatment2006Olmsted Center for Landscape PreservationNational Park ServiceBoston, MassachusettsTABLE OF CONTENTS
|clr/index.htmLast Updated: 09-Apr-2007
Order issued January 12 , 201 5 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

________________________________________

No. 05

- 1 4

- 0 0 356

- CR

________________________________________

PAUL LEWIS WARREN , Appellant



### V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee



### O R D E R

Before Justices Francis, Evans, and Stoddart

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we GRANT the August 19, 2014 motion of

Steven R. Miears for leave to withdraw as appointed counsel on appeal. We DIRECT the Clerk

of the Court to remove Steven R. Miears as counsel of record for appellant. We DIRECT the

Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order and all future correspondence to Paul Lewis

Warren, 202 Jefferson Street, McKinney, Texas, 75069.

/ David Evans/

DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.2
 
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
 Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of PLM Equipment Growth Fund V (the Partnership), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner and of the Partnership, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
 
 (1)  the Report of the Partnership filed today fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 
 
 
 
 /s/ Richard K Brock
 Richard K Brock
 Chief Financial Officer of PLM Financial Services, Inc.
 (Principal Financial Officer)
 August 12, 2004
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 339.8 Reservation as to terms of offer.

The Secretary of the Treasury reserves the right to reject any exchange subscription for Series H bonds, in whole or in part, and to refuse to issue or permit to be issued hereunder any such bonds in any case or any class or classes of cases if he deems such action to be in the public interest, and his action in any such respect shall be final.

The foregoing revision and amendment is made for the purpose of granting to owners of savings notes the same privilege afforded owners of Series E savings bonds for exchanging their securities for Series H bonds with or without tax deferral. As good cause exists for making this change, which involves public property and contracts relating to the fiscal and monetary affairs of the United States, I find that notice and public procedures are unnecessary. This action is effected under the provisions of sections 18, 20, and 22 of the Second Liberty Bond Act, as amended (40 Stat. 1309, 48 Stat. 343, 49 Stat. 21, 73 Stat. 621, all as amended; 31 U.S.C. 753, 754b, 757c), and 5 U.S.C. 301.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1165

To amend the Appalachian Regional Development Act of 1965 to include

Montgomery, Roanoke, and Rockbridge Counties, Virginia, as part of

the Appalachian region.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 8, 1995

Mr. GOODLATTE (for himself and Mr. BOUCHER) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To amend the Appalachian Regional Development Act of

1965 to include Montgomery, Roanoke, and Rockbridge

Counties, Virginia, as part of the Appalachian region.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INCLUSION OF MONTGOMERY, ROANOKE, AND

4 ROCKBRIDGE COUNTIES, VIRGINIA, AS PART

5 OF APPALACHIAN REGION.

6 The 12th undesignated paragraph of section 403 of

7 the Appalachian Regional Development Act of 1965 (40

8 U.S.C. App. 403) is amended—
2

•HR 1165 IH

1 (1) by inserting ‘‘Montgomery,’’ after ‘‘Lee,’’;

2 and

3 (2) by inserting ‘‘Roanoke, Rockbridge,’’ after

4 ‘‘Pulaski,’’.

Æ
#### § 1010.300 General.

Each financial institution (as defined in 31 U.S.C. 5312(a)(2) or (c)(1)) should refer to its chapter X part for any additional reporting requirements. Unless otherwise indicated, the reporting requirements contained in this subpart C apply to all financial institutions.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 351.47 May I purchase definitive Series EE savings bonds through a payroll savings plan? Treasury discontinued the issuance of definitive Series EE savings bonds through a payroll savings plan: ( a ) Effective October 1, 2010, for United States government employees, and
( b ) Effective January 1, 2011, for all other employees.
[75 FR 52460, Aug. 26, 2010]
Harris County,



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

July 23, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00287

- CV

Cecil ADAMS and Maxine Adams,

Appellant s

v.

HARRIS COUNTY , Rebecca Ross, Kathleen Keese and Christopher A. Prine, Clerk of the

Court,

Appellee s

From the 269th Distr ict Court, Harris County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- 35653

Honorable Dan Hinde, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellee ’ s Motion to Withdraw Mo tion to Dismiss is GRANTED.

_________________________________ Jason Pulliam, J ustice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 23rd day of July, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Cle rk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of NELX,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended November 30, 2003 (the "Report") filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission,  I, John M. Jacobs, Chief Executive Officer
and Principal Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Company's  Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



         January 19, 2004                         /s/ John M. Jacobs
                                                    --------------------------
                                                    John M. Jacobs
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                                    Principal Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,003
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,581
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (104)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         108,878
<DEPRECIATION>                                (73,917)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,377
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         17,420
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,744
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    51,377
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,608
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,781
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    47
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 992
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,654
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,654
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,654
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25


</TABLE>
AAM-13-274-E April 17, 2013

Exemption No. 10292A Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-0595

Mr. Bartley J. Hallinan Port Towsend Air, LLC. Jefferson Co. International Airport 191 Airport Rd Port Townsend, WA 98368

Dear Mr. Hallinan:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 10292. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions and

limitations.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letters dated February 28 and March 11, 2013 letter, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Port Townsend Air, LLC (PTA) for an extension of Exemption No. 10292. That exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows PTA to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program while operating under separate parts of the regulation.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to PTA.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10292 remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions and limitations.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of Port Townsend Air are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol program must be implemented under the auspices of the Port Townsend Air part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on July 31, 2015, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/
James R. Fraser, M.D. Deputy Federal Air Surgeon
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 248.8 Inquiries.

Claimants should direct any inquiries regarding the application of these regulations to the department or agency or disbursing officer concerned.
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.6223(a)-1 Notice sent to tax matters partner. ( a ) *In general.* For purposes of subchapter C of chapter 63 of the Internal Revenue Code, a notice is treated as mailed to the tax matters partner on the earlier of— ( 1 ) The date on which the notice is mailed to “THE TAX MATTERS PARTNER” at the address of the partnership (as provided on the partnership return, except as updated under § 301.6223(c)-1); or
( 2 ) The date on which the notice is mailed to the person who is the tax matters partner at the address of that person (as provided on the partner's return, except as updated under § 301.6223(c)-1) or the partnership. See § 301.6223(c)-1 for rules relating to the information used by the Internal Revenue Service in providing notices, etc.
( b ) *Example.* The provisions of this section may be illustrated by the following example: Example. Partnership P designates B as its tax matters partner in accordance with § 301.6231(a)(7)-1(b). On December 1 a notice of the beginning of an administrative proceeding is mailed to “THE TAX MATTERS PARTNER” at the address of P. On January 10, a copy of the notice is mailed to B at B's address. December 1 is treated as the date that the notice was mailed to the tax matters partner.
( c ) *Effective date.* This section is applicable to partnership taxable years beginning on or after October 4, 2001. For years beginning prior to October 4, 2001, see § 301.6223(a)-1T contained in 26 CFR part 1, revised April 1, 2001.
[T.D. 8965, 66 FR 50547, Oct. 4, 2001]
Sustainable & Healthy Communitie

Office of Research & Development

Michael Slimak, Ph.D. 

National Program Director 
A Sustainable Community 

Conceptual Framework

Role of Collective Role of Individ

Natural Capital Conserved 

Communitylevel Economic Resilience

Better Health Outcomes and Increased Wellbeing

Role of Individ

Human Beha

Role of Collective

Human Behavior
Sustainability and Communities 

A Sustainable Community

– Protects and improves the health and well-being of al– Provides opportunities for public & private investment– Social equity enhanced –

Conserves its natural resources and promotes open s

Communities rarely focus on all of these objectiveSHC is based on the principle that a systems-app

will improve a community’s ability to simultaneoaddress all of these objectives 
Research Designed Around 4 

Themes

Theme 1: Data and Tools to 

Support Sustainable 

Community Decisions

Theme 2: Forecasting and 

Assessing Ecological and 

Community Health

Theme 3: Near-te

Approaches f

Sustainable Solu

Theme 4: Integrated 

Solutions for Sustainable 

Outcomes

As described in the Strategic Research Action Plan 2012-2016
2002 Amended Servicing Agreement



 Exhibit 10.23 
 EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO THE 2002 AMENDED SERVICING AGREEMENT 
 THIS AMENDMENT (“Amendment”) is made this 15th day of December, 2006 to that certain 2002 Amended Servicing Agreement (“Agreement”) by and between BOSTON SERVICE COMPANY, INC. (“BSC”) and AUTO LENDERS LIQUIDATION CENTER,
INC. (“Auto Lenders”). 
 BACKGROUND 
 BSC and Auto Lenders wish to amend the Amended Servicing Agreement by changing language in the Second Amendment to the 2002 Servicing Agreement and inserting additional language to Paragraph 4 –
Delivery & Reconditioning of Vehicles and by inserting the agreed upon Servicing Fee for calendar year 2009 within Paragraph 9. All other terms and conditions remain in full force and effect. 
 Change to Fourth Amendment to the Amended Servicing Agreement 
 Amendment to Paragraph 4 – Delivery and Reconditioning of Vehicles 
 The paragraph will limit the amount of reimbursed
expense by BSC to Auto Lenders covering the period of 01/01/07 through 12/31/07 to $675,000 per month. 
 Amendment to Paragraph 9 – Consideration

 This Paragraph shall be amended as it pertains to the Guarantee Fees found under Paragraph B (iv) in which the agreed upon
Guarantee Fee for the calendar year 2009 will appear as follows: 
 The Guarantee Fee will be $250,000 per month for the period 01/01/09
through 12/31/09. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, BSC and Auto Lenders have caused this Eighth Amendment to the 2002 Amended Servicing Agreement to be executed by
their duly authorized corporate officers and their corporate seals to be affixed hereto the day and year written beneath their signatures below; each intending this Amendment shall become effective on the date first written above. 
  

									
		 		 	AUTO LENDERS LIQUIDIATION CENTER, INC.
					
	Attest:	 	/s/ Beverly Shoemaker	 		 	By:	 	/s/ Michael Wimmer
	[Assistant] Secretary	 		 	Title:	 	Pres\CEO
				
	(Corp. Seal)	 		 	Dated:	 	12/18/06
			
		 		 	 BOSTON SERVICE COMPANY, INC. t/a
 HANN
FINANCIAL SERVICE CORP.

					
	Attest:	 	Laura Fields	 		 	By:	 	/s/ Charles Dovico
	[Assistant] Secretary	 		 	Title:	 	President & CEO
				
	(Corp. Seal)	 		 	Dated:	 	12/18/06
# LI2020128EN.01000101.xml

| 23.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | LI 128/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.4.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

LI 128/1

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2020/556

of 21 April 2020

extending the temporary derogation from the Council’s Rules of Procedure introduced by Decision (EU) 2020/430 in view of the travel difficulties caused by the COVID-19 pandemic in the Union

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 240(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Council Decision (EU) 2020/430 (1) introduced a one-month derogation from the first subparagraph of Article 12(1) of the Council’s Rules of Procedure (2) as regards decisions to use the ordinary written procedure, where those decisions are taken by the Committee of the Permanent Representatives of the Governments of the Member States (Coreper). That derogation expires on 23 April 2020. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Council Decision (EU) 2020/430 (1) introduced a one-month derogation from the first subparagraph of Article 12(1) of the Council’s Rules of Procedure (2) as regards decisions to use the ordinary written procedure, where those decisions are taken by the Committee of the Permanent Representatives of the Governments of the Member States (Coreper). That derogation expires on 23 April 2020.

| (2) | Decision (EU) 2020/430 provides that, if justified by continued exceptional circumstances, the Council may renew that Decision. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Decision (EU) 2020/430 provides that, if justified by continued exceptional circumstances, the Council may renew that Decision.

| (3) | Given that the exceptional circumstances caused by the COVID-19 pandemic continue, with a number of extraordinary preventive and containment measures taken by Member States still in place, it is necessary to extend the derogation provided for in Article 1 of Decision (EU) 2020/430 for a further period of one month, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Given that the exceptional circumstances caused by the COVID-19 pandemic continue, with a number of extraordinary preventive and containment measures taken by Member States still in place, it is necessary to extend the derogation provided for in Article 1 of Decision (EU) 2020/430 for a further period of one month,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The derogation provided for in Article 1 of Decision (EU) 2020/430 is hereby extended for a period of one month from 23 April 2020.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the date of its adoption.

It shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 21 April 2020.

For the Council

The President

G. GRLIĆ RADMAN

---

(1)  Council Decision (EU) 2020/430 of 23 March 2020 on a temporary derogation from the Council’s Rules of Procedure in view of the travel difficulties caused by the COVID-19 pandemic in the Union (OJ L 88I, 24.3.2020, p. 1).

1

(2)  Council Decision 2009/937/EU of 1 December 2009 adopting the Council’s Rules of Procedure (OJ L 325, 11.12.2009, p. 35).

2

---