alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTH CI RCUI T J ULY 30, 2009 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

No. 0 8- 16 04 6
D. C. Dock etNo. 0 7- 02 00 4 C V-W SD-1 BANKOLE O. OGUNBAMISE, Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll an t,
ve rs us W ELLSTAR COBB HOSPITAL, 2- So ut h, Defen da nt -Ap pe ll ee.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Nor th ern Dis tri ctof Ge or gi a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ (J ul y 30 , 20 09 ) Befo re DUBINA, Ch ie f Ju dg e, TJOFLAT, Cir cu itJu dg e, an d B OW EN, Dis tri ct * Ju dg e.
Honora

ble Dudley H. Bow en, J r., United States District J udg e for the Southern District of * Geor g ia, sitting by

desig nation.PER CURI AM:

App el la ntBan ko le Ogu nb am is e, pr o s e , app eal s t he di st ric t co ur t’s g ran t o f
su m m ary jud gm en t t o Og un ba m is e’s fo rm er em pl oyer, W el lS ta r Heal th Sy st em , In c. (“ W el lS ta r”), i n h is ag e d is cri m in at io n a ndret al ia ti on su it , fil edpu rs ua ntto th e Age Dis cri m in at io n a ndEm pl oym en t Act , 29 U.S.C. § 6 23 (a)( 1) , (d) (“ ADEA”). W e rev ie w a co ur t’s g ran t o f su m m ary jud gm en t de no vo . Co fi eld v

. Goldkis t, In c. , 26 7 F .3d12 64 , 12 67 (11 th Cir . 20 01 ). Afte r rev ie win g t he reco rd , read in g t he pa rti es ’ br ie fs , andha vi ng th e be ne fitof o ral arg um en t, we fi rs t co nc lu de th atth e d is tri ctco urt p ro pe rly gran te d
su m m ary jud gm en t o n Og un ba m is e’s ADEA clai m be cau se Ogu nb am is e d idno t
es tabl is h t ha t h e was rep la cedby a y ou ng er i nd iv idua l o r tr eat eddi ffer en tl y th an a si m il arl y si tu at edpe rs on . As t o Og un ba m is e’s ret al ia ti on cla im , we con cl ud e fro m th e rec or d t ha t t he di st ric t co ur t p ro pe rly fou ndth atOgu nb am is e fai le d t o p res en t a p rima facie cas e of ret al ia ti on be cau se he fai le d t o s ho w a cau sa l co nn ect io n b etweenhi s p ro te ct ed act iv it y an d t he all eg edad ve rs e em pl oym en t ac ti on s h e su ffer ed . Accor di ng ly, we affi rm th e d is tri ctco ur t’s g ran t o f su m m ary jud gm en t i n fa vo r of W el lS ta r. AFFIRMED.
2
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1372

To authorize appropriations for the Federal Election Commission for fiscal

year 1996.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 30, 1995

Mr. THOMAS of California introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on House Oversight

A BILL

To authorize appropriations for the Federal Election

Commission for fiscal year 1996.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the second sentence of section 314 of the Federal

4 Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 439c) is amend5 ed by striking out ‘‘and’’ after ‘‘1978,’’ and by inserting

6 after ‘‘1981’’ the following: ‘‘, and $27,634,000 for the

7 fiscal year ending September 30, 1996’’.

Æ
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 351.42 What is the issue date of a definitive series EE savings bond?

The issue date of a definitive bond is the first day of the month in which an authorized issuing agent received payment of the issue price.

[76 FR 66855, Oct. 28, 2011]
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Assistant Secretary Stewart Travels to South Africa and Egypt

# 									Assistant Secretary Stewart Travels to South Africa and Egypt							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

May 5, 2023

From May 6-12, 2023, Assistant Secretary for Arms Control, Verification and Compliance Mallory Stewart will travel to Cape Town and Pretoria, South Africa, and Cairo, Egypt, to meet with leaders in government and academia, as well as NGO officials.

In Cape Town, she will conduct briefings and speak with faculty and graduate students at Saldanha Bay Military Academy, Stellenbosch University. Later that afternoon, the Assistant Secretary will deliver a speech at the South African Institute of International Affairs, Western Cape Branch.

In Pretoria, May 9-10, Assistant Secretary Stewart will hold talks with several officials at the Department of International Relations and Cooperation Republic of South Africa (DIRCO). Briefings and discussions will center around emerging technology, nonproliferation, risk reduction and space affairs. In Cairo, Egypt, she will conclude her trip with meetings at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and with the Assistant Secretary General of the League of Arab States.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsBureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and StabilityBureau of Near Eastern AffairsEgyptOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial International TravelSouth Africa

Back to Top
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1334

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide a financial incentive

for States to reduce expenditures under the medicaid program, and

for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 28, 1995

Ms. MOLINARI (for herself, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. KING, Mr. MCHUGH, Mr.

PAXON, Mr. SKEEN, and Mr. UNDERWOOD) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide

a financial incentive for States to reduce expenditures

under the medicaid program, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State Medicaid Savings

5 Incentive Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. MEDICAID COST CONTAINMENT INCENTIVE PAY7 MENTS.

8 (a) INCENTIVE PAYMENTS.—Section 1903(a) of the

9 Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396b(a)) is amended—
2

•HR 1334 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (7), by striking the period and

2 inserting ‘‘; plus’’; and

3 (2) by adding at the end the following new

4 paragraph:

5 ‘‘(8) in the case of a State to which subsection (x)

6 applies, the amount of the incentive payment determined

7 under such subsection.’’.

8 (b) INCENTIVE PAYMENT.—Section 1903 of the So9 cial Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396b) is amended by adding

10 at the end the following new subsection:

11 ‘‘(x)(1) For purposes of subsection (a)(8), if a State

12 achieves a rate of growth for a fiscal year which is less

13 than the State baseline rate of growth for such fiscal year

14 established under paragraph (3), the Secretary shall make

15 an incentive payment to the State for the fiscal year in

16 the amount determined under paragraph (2).

17 ‘‘(2) The amount of any incentive payment shall be

18 equal to the amount that is 20 percent of the difference

19 between the amount that the Federal Government would

20 have paid to a State in a fiscal year for providing medical

21 assistance in accordance with this title, if State expendi22 tures for providing such assistance had increased by the

23 State baseline rate of growth established under paragraph

24 (3) for such fiscal year, and the amount that the Federal

25 Government paid to such State in the fiscal year for pro-
3

•HR 1334 IH

1 viding medical assistance in accordance with this title

2 using the actual State rate of growth for State expendi3 tures for providing such assistance.

4 ‘‘(3) At the beginning of each fiscal year, the Sec5 retary shall determine for that fiscal year a baseline rate

6 of growth for medicaid expenditures for each State with

7 a State plan approved under this title based on—

8 ‘‘(A) the historical rate of growth for such ex9 penditures in the State; and

10 ‘‘(B) such other factors as the Secretary deems

11 appropriate.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 31

Certifications

I, Richard Simpson, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2016-P6 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association; CWCapital Asset Management LLC; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC; Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas; Principal Real Estate Investors, LLC; Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; KeyBank National Association; CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc.; National Tax Search, LLC; Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC; Trimont Real Estate Advisors, LLC; AEGON USA Realty Advisors, LLC; and LNR Partners, LLC.

Date:March 27, 2020

|  | /s/ Richard Simpson ___________________Richard SimpsonPresident, Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor) |
|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

CGCMT 2016-P6 Certifications
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Assistant Secretary Pyatt’s Travel to Trinidad and Tobago and Guyana

# 									Assistant Secretary Pyatt’s Travel to Trinidad and Tobago and Guyana							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

May 5, 2023

Department of State Bureau of Energy Resources (ENR) Assistant Secretary Geoffrey R. Pyatt will travel to Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago, and Georgetown, Guyana, May 8-10.  The Assistant Secretary will promote regional energy security and advance the clean energy transition in the Caribbean, key goals of the U.S.-Caribbean Partnership to Address the Climate Crisis 2030 (PACC 2030).

In Port of Spain, he will meet with government officials and energy stakeholders to identify and expand on areas of cooperation for clean energy.  Assistant Secretary Pyatt also will participate in a Women in Energy Roundtable to highlight the contributions of women to the energy industry in Trinidad and Tobago.

In Georgetown, Assistant Secretary Pyatt will meet with Guyanese government officials, business leaders, and American companies to discuss bilateral cooperation on the full range of energy issues.

For further media information, please contact ENR-PD-Clearances@state.gov

Tags

Bureau of Energy ResourcesBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsClimate ChangeEnergyGuyanaOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial International TravelTrinidad and Tobago

Back to Top
From:

"Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

To:

David Cozzie/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Amy Hambrick/RTP/USE PA/US@EPA, Gerain Perry/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Jim

Berlow/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date:

06/11/2012 08:05 PM

Subject:

FW: E.O. 12866 Meeitng on the NSPS and EG: Commerci al and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units: R econsideration and

Proposed Amendments; Non-Hazardous Secondary Materi als That Are Solid Waste: Proposed Rule

Hi all,

Consistent with EO 12866, attached are the handouts from today’s meeting.

Regards,

Cortney

-----Original Appointment-----

From: Echols, Mabel E.

Subject: E.O. 12866 Meeitng on the NSPS and EG: Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units: Reco nsideration and

Proposed Amendments; Non-Hazardous Secondary Materi als That Are Solid Waste: Proposed Rule

When: Monday, June 11, 2012 1:00 PM-1:30 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).

Where: Room 10103 New Executive Office Building

This meeting has been requested by Jane Luxton, Pep per Hamilton LLP on behalf of the Treated Wood Coun cil. 

# (See attached file: 2060-AR15_2012_6_11_Wood_Handou t4.pdf)

(See attached file: 2060-AR15_2012_6_11_Wood_Handou t3.pdf)

(See attached file: 2060-AR15_2012_6_11_Wood_Handou t2.pdf)

(See attached file: 2060-AR15_2012_6_11_Wood_Handou t1.pdf)
HomeThe Secretary of StateRemarks & Releases…Biden Administration Announces Additional U.S. Security Assistance for Ukraine

# 											Biden Administration Announces Additional U.S. Security Assistance for Ukraine									

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

December 6, 2023

The United States is today announcing a new package of weapons and equipment to support the people of Ukraine as they defend their country and their freedom against Russia’s aggression.This package, which uses the limited resources that remain available to help Ukraine, provides up to $175 million of arms and equipment under previously directed drawdowns. Capabilities provided in today’s package include air defense munitions, additional ammunition for High Mobility Artillery Rockets Systems, artillery ammunition, High-speed Anti-Radiation Missiles, anti-armor missiles, small arms ammunition, demolitions munitions for obstacle clearing, equipment to protect critical national infrastructure, and spare parts, ancillary equipment, services, training, and transportation.Until Russia ends this war by stopping its brutal attacks and withdrawing its forces from Ukraine, it is critical for the United States to continue to lead the coalition we have built of more than 50 countries standing strongly with Ukraine.

Unless Congress acts to pass the President’s national security supplemental funding request, this will be one of the last security assistance packages we can provide to Ukraine. Helping Ukraine defend itself against Russian aggression and secure its future advances our national security interests and contributes to global stability around the world, and we need Congress to act immediately.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of Political-Military AffairsHuman Rights and DemocracyInternational SecurityOffice of the SpokespersonPolitical-Military CooperationRussiaThe Secretary of StateStabilizationUkraine

Back to Top
www.gpo.gov

### §119. Allotment of tribal funds to individual Indians

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized, in his discretion, from time to time, to designate any individual Indian belonging to any tribe or tribes whom he may deem to be capable of managing his or her affairs, and he may cause to be apportioned and allotted to any such Indian his or her pro rata share of any tribal or trust funds on deposit in the Treasury of the United States to the credit of the tribe or tribes of which said Indian is a member, and the amount so apportioned and allotted shall be placed to the credit of such Indian upon the books of the Treasury, and the same shall thereupon be subject to the order of such Indian: *Provided*, That no apportionment or allotment shall be made to any Indian until such Indian has first made an application therefor: *Provided further*, That the Secretaries of the Interior and of the Treasury are directed to withhold from such apportionment and allotment a sufficient sum of the said Indian funds as may be necessary or required to pay any existing claims against said Indians that may be pending for settlement by judicial determination in the United States Court of Federal Claims or in the Executive Departments of the Government, at time of such apportionment and allotment.

(Mar. 2, 1907, ch. 2523, §1, 34 Stat. 1221; Pub. L. 97–164, title I, §160(a)(7), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 48; Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, §902(b)(1), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4516.)

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–572 substituted “United States Court of Federal Claims” for “United States Claims Court”.

1982—Pub. L. 97–164 substituted “United States Claims Court” for “Court of Claims”.

#### Effective Date of 1992 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 102–572 effective Oct. 29, 1992, see section 911 of Pub. L. 102–572, set out as a note under section 171 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

#### Effective Date of 1982 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 97–164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as a note under section 171 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### Cross References

Trust funds on deposit in Treasury, see sections 1321 and 1322 of Title 31, Money and Finance.
Skip to Content

NLM Home
About the Archives

Home**NLM Archives**

**Document content is not current. Links may be broken.**
DISMISS and Opinion Filed December 19, 2018 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00252-CV 

STEVEN N. HALL, Appellant 

V. 

PATRICIA HALL, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DF-17-09911 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Evans, and Justice Brown 

Opinion by Chief Justice Wright 

Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. By order dated August 2, 2018, we granted 

appellant’s third motion to extend time to file his brief and ordered his brief to be filed by August 

31, 2018. By postcard dated October 26, 2018, we notified appellant the time for filing his brief 

had expired. We directed appellant to file a brief and an extension motion within ten days. We 

cautioned appellant that failure to file a brief and an extension motion would result in the dismissal 

of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not filed his brief nor otherwise 

corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. 

 
 –2– 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), (c).

180252F.P05 

 

/Carolyn Wright/ 

CAROLYN WRIGHT 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

STEVEN N. HALL, Appellant 

No. 05-18-00252-CV V. 

PATRICIA HALL, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DF-17-09911. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. 

Justices Evans and Brown participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. 

 It is ORDERED that appellee PATRICIA HALL recover her costs of this appeal from 

appellant STEVEN N. HALL. 

Judgment entered December 19, 2018.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

###### Editorial Note on Part 353

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 353 appear at 79 FR 8859, Feb. 14, 2014.

#### § 353.12 Disposition of excess.

If any person at any time has savings bonds issued during any one calendar year in excess of the prescribed amount, the Bureau of the Fiscal Service reserves the right to take any action that it deems necessary to adjust the excess. Instructions for adjustment of the excess can be obtained by email at *savbonds@bpd.treas.gov* or by writing to Bureau of the Fiscal Service, Parkersburg, WV 26106-1328.

[68 FR 24805, May 8, 2003]
#### Daniel Zapata, Respondent, v County of Suffolk et al., Appellants.

[806 NYS2d 597]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Burke, J.), dated February 21, 2003, which denied their motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff failed to comply with General Municipal Law § 50-h.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint dismissed.

The plaintiff did not appear for his scheduled General Municipal Law § 50-h hearing because he was incarcerated at a correctional facility upstate. In response to the plaintiffs inquiry, the County of Suffolk advised him that he was responsible for taking the necessary steps to arrange for his attendance at the municipal hearing in accordance with Civil Rights Law § 79. No *554further action was taken by either party until the plaintiff commenced this action.

A party who has failed to comply with General Municipal Law § 50-h is precluded from commencing an action against a municipality *(see Patterson v Ford,*255 AD2d 373 [1998]; *Heins v Board of Trustees of Inc. Vil. of Greenport,*237 AD2d 570 [1997]; *Arcila v Incorporated Vil. of Freeport,*231 AD2d 660 [1996]). We disagree with the Supreme Court’s conclusion that the plaintiffs incarceration constituted an exceptional circumstance excusing his failure to appear for the repeatedly adjourned hearing and that the municipal defendant was obligated to arrange for his attendance at the hearing *(see Scalzo v County of Suffolk,*306 AD2d 397 [2003]; Civil Rights Law § 79).

We reject the plaintiffs contention that the appeal should be dismissed as untimely taken as there is no evidence as to when the order with notice of entry was allegedly served upon the defendants *(see Deshler v East W. Renovators,*259 AD2d 351, 352 [1999]; *Sandcham Realty Corp. v Taub,*299 AD2d 220, 221 [2002]). S. Miller, J.P., Krausman, Rivera and Co vello, JJ., concur.