alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
39945, 39946.

#### IRVIN v. AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS; and vice versa.

Russell, Judge.

A motion to dismiss the bill of exceptions has been filed by counsel for the defendant in error on the ground that when the bill of exceptions was presented to the trial judge and the certificate thereon signed by him it was not itself signed by either the movant, his counsel, or anyone for him. The motion is supported by affidavits of the trial judge and the Clerk of the Superior Court of Richmond County to the effect that the bill of exceptions was not signed when it was presented to the judge, when the certificate was signed by him, or when it was presented to the clerk to be filed, but that the clerk “later” called the attention of the movant to the omission and the signature was then affixed. These facts are not disputed either in the briefs or in the argument of the case.

This court is loth, except upon the most demanding of precedents, to dismiss a case here on appeal for a technicality so apparently trivial as the order in which the signatures of the movant and the judge respectively were affixed to the bill of exceptions. The writ appears on its face to be in proper form on its arrival here. Nevertheless, examination of the original record in *Sumner v. Sumner,*116 Ga. 798 (43 SE 57) as well as the discussion of that case in *O’Connell Bros. v. Friedman, Keiler & Co.,*117 Ga. 948 (43 SE 1001) reveals that the procedures followed here and in *Sumner*are identical—that is, a motion to dismiss on the stated ground *265supported by the affidavits of the trial judge and the clerk of the court, and not denied by counter-affidavit. Since the unsigned paper tendered to the trial judge was not in fact a valid bill of exceptions, and the addition of the signature at a later time could not transform it into one *(Code Ann.*§ 6-901; *Graham v. Continental Cas. Co.,*96 Ga. App. 495, 100 SE2d 597; *Sumner v. Sumner,*supra), it follows that both the main bill and cross-bill of exceptions must be

Decided January 25, 1963.

*Claud B. Caldwell,*for plaintiff in error.

*Bell*.efe *Bell, John C. Bell, Congdon & Holley, B. Eugene Holley,*contra.

*Dismissed.*

*Felton, C. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.*
Exhibit 32



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Transcend Services, Inc., certifies that the Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2003, which accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Transcend Services, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section
1350 of the United States Code and is subject to the knowledge and willfulness qualifications contained in Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350(c).



|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                   
|/s/    Larry G. Gerdes                                             
|                                                                   
|Larry G. Gerdes Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer



Date:
October 31, 2003
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO**
** **
**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
** **
**AS      ADOPTED **

**PURSUANT      TO**
** **
**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Registrant. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                JAMES B. MCCCARTHY              |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                               |   |
| James                B. McCarthy                   |   |
| Interim                Principal Financial Officer |   |
| May                20, 2008                        |   |

----
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2011-0479 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2010-NM-154-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 355.10 What happens if I present my check to the payor Reserve Bank more than six months after the issue date of the check? If the payor Reserve Bank refuses payment on a fiscal agency check solely because it is presented more than six (6) months after the issue date of the check, a replacement check will be issued if you: ( a ) Surrender the original check; and
( b ) Executive the required indemnification agreement.
# Third Court ofAppeals

RECEIPT FOR CHECK-OUT RECORD (CLOSED CASES) 

# /RECEIVED^ MAR 0 3 2015 THIRDCOURTOFAPPEALS 

### ^ (FFFRFYD.KYLE /
This is to acknowledge that I have takenreceipt of thefollowing itemsof this record. I understand that I am fully responsible for the care and custody of these items. These items will be returned no later than the due date shown below. These items were received by me in good condition, properly bound and certified by the appropriate Clerk or Court Reporter if applicable.

Cause Number: 03-10-00016-CV Retention Center No.: 

### Name ofCause: TJFA, L.P. et al v TX Comm on Environmental Quality & Waste Mgmt ofTX Items Checked out: 3 boxes of administrative record

Date Items Cheeked Out: Requested By: Attorney: Signature: Bar Card Number: Firm/Agency: Environmental Protection Division Address: P.O. Box 12548 Phone Number: 512-463-2012 Date Items are due: PERMANENT

Driver Lie.:

*************************************************************************** Approved By: Jeff Kyle

*********************************************************************************************************** Dates Items Returned: PERMANENT
HomeBiographies...Ian Moss

# 				Ian Moss			

															Deputy Coordinator for Counterterrorism						Bureau of Counterterrorism												

				April 11, 2022 -									Present							

Tags

Bureau of CounterterrorismState Department Official

Back to Top
(logo) pwc

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

To Management of AEGON USARealty Advisors, LLC

 

We have examined management’s assertion,included in the accompanying *Report on Assessment of Compliance withApplicable Servicing Criteria Pursuant to Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB underthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934*, that AEGON USA Realty Advisors, LLC(“AEGON” or the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth inItem 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for thecommercial mortgage backed securities transactions listed in management’sassertion (the “Platform”), as of December 31, 2016 and for the year thenended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i), 1122(d)(3)(ii),1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x),1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), 1122(d)(4)(xiii), 1122(d)(4)(xiv) and 1122(d)(4)(xv),which AEGON has determined are not applicable to the servicing activitiesperformed by it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for theCompany’s compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is toexpress an opinion on management’s assertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in thecircumstances. Our examination included testing of selected asset-backedtransactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selectedservicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether theCompany processed those selected transactions and performed those selectedactivities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedureswere limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed bythe Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were notdesigned to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurredprior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances oramounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by thisreport. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for ouropinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on theCompany’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’sassertion that AEGON complied with the aforementioned applicable servicingcriteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 for the Platform isfairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

February 28, 2017

 

 

*PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,1100 Walnut Street, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106*

*T: (816) 472 7921, F:(816)218 1890,*www.pwc.com/us
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001045548
<NAME>  TE PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LIMITED PARTNER.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          26,796
<SECURITIES>                                     2,105
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,263
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     22,174
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                68,261
<PP&E>                                         744,483
<DEPRECIATION>                                 176,058
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 690,391
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,788
<BONDS>                                        389,699
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     229,654
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   690,391
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                50,205
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,691
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,156
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,289
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,155
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (72,767)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (59,612)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.75)
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 203.1 Scope.

The regulations in this part govern the processing by financial institutions of electronic and paper-based deposits and payments of Federal taxes; the operation of the Treasury Tax and Loan (TT&L) program; the designation of TT&L depositaries; and the operation of the investment program. A financial institution may participate in the TT&L program by participating in the investment program or by accepting Federal tax payments, or both. A financial institution that accepts Federal tax payments may do so through the paper tax system (PATAX), or Electronic Federal Tax Payment System (EFTPS), or both. However, a financial institution is not designated as a TT&L depositary if it only processes EFTPS payments.
Am pert bok seeped ty he

(oe Nay ine mabe hoes of SUAS Ces Caroma tot head Pater Deg

Ths geteecwor on oa maa re rs Vetoes mney Brett fr mee ree

joe Srepres esas bee ted Mewwte mmyenee tree

BATHYMETRIC MAP

Nested 21 Warrges, OC
US. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
SATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATWOSHE
MATIONAL OCEAN SE
1984

METRE CORTOUR INTERVAL 90 ANE TERS TE) tannotons DEPTHS
PPLRManetnS Ay 1D METRE WTRIEALS

CATIA LOWE

CRDRNTRRE AAIRCAION FEES
Seale 1780000

‘GULF OF MEXICO
WALKER RIDGE

WALKER RIDGE
NOS NG 15-6
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

Editorial Note on Part 353
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 353 appear at 79 FR 8859, Feb. 14, 2014.

§ 353.88 Payment to a State claiming title to abandoned bonds. ( a ) *General.* The Department of the Treasury may, in its discretion, recognize an escheat judgment that purports to vest a State with title to a definitive savings bond that has reached final maturity and is in the State's possession, when the State presents evidence satisfactory to Treasury that the bond has been abandoned by all persons entitled to payment under Treasury regulations. A State claiming title to a definitive savings bond as the heir to a deceased owner must comply with the requirements of subpart L, and not this section. Treasury will not recognize an escheat judgment that purports to vest a State with title to a bond that has not reached its final maturity. Treasury also will not recognize an escheat judgment that purports to vest a State with title to a bond that the State does not possess, or a judgment that purports to grant the State custody of a bond, but not title.
( b ) *Due process.* At a minimum, a State requesting payment under this section must demonstrate to Treasury's satisfaction that it made reasonable efforts to provide actual and constructive notice of the escheat proceeding to all persons listed on the face of the bond and all persons who may have an interest in the bond, and that those persons had an opportunity to be heard before the escheat judgment was entered.
( c ) *Fulfillment of obligation.* Payment to a State claiming title under this section fulfills the United States' obligations to the same extent as if payment had been made to the registered owner.
[80 FR 80264, Dec. 24, 2015]
UNITED STATES BATHYMETRIC FISHING MAP EWING DANK NW.

iWeziyll
cinta

yt

Ri
Het
rat

Py saw

Pore ecteectitcarkaanastiontiourti tiered ona SMR. Pibdsted we Wuttogier OC
bem eprny chee aty a gach gmp anne Len ann we Nhe apap on a EWING BANK NW
Ne Maen ~e Someta inetd _
Stead aaron teciomane samen meemos alice cca Seve BATHYMETRIC FISHING MAP
Net Ne mee Cid ae ILO tee Tah te Sie ed me - Lad sa
Hom one A etn (Beserrabie” CERISE PETREVALS 7 MfTHE KD dnanunane (rR ee es wore
Pe rie ae ae ee te ee im a . MGPeLE woth Pe MERU TEVA =~ 5
neers te lees tas cabana © A] Oe! Conta
Noval ear poeeen Wich bomen ese een alee he Sneesitl ——
Piscent ven dptare thor Atenas sad 2 “Nine mins Ceo A wat - sf
Wee ree ’ —
atuaesin Toes aasvert pengiencne
het ot = Serie
oH ? r ; 7 ’ oT 7 r “+
= ee = + T any t —*t >
r Terry rT.

NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATIO
Whe chet segmomng ote areas Nan Wn 4 0" sete
et Sega a pro tel 8) Shen = Beran nmr

om
be Seep © te wit cate we Se betes Hey
PT THT se 1

tet
—
# C_2020250EN.01000501.xml

| 30.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 250/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 250/5

---

Commission Declaration accompanying the Commission Implementing Regulation on the collection and sharing of user statistics and feedback on the services of the single digital gateway in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2018/1724 of the European Parliament and of the Council

(2020/C 250/05)

The Commission intends to explore, together with the Member States in the framework of the gateway coordination group, the feasibility of and the demand for a common EU level service, managed by the Commission, or another solution to facilitate the collection and transmission of statistics related to webpages that are part of the gateway and are under the responsibility of municipal authorities.

---
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 359.47 How is payment made for purchases of book-entry Series I savings bonds?

You may only purchase book-entry Series I savings bonds online through your New Treasury Direct account. You may pay for your securities through a debit to your designated account at a United States depository financial institution, or by applying the redemption proceeds of a certificate of indebtedness held in your New Treasury Direct account.

[69 FR 50308, Aug. 16, 2004]
(Superior Court of Cincinnati,

1899.)

#### KEUHTER v. TEMMEN ET AL.

. *Creditor acquiring interest by garnishment may enter superior court in litigation affect*| *ing such*interest—

A creditor, who by garnishment in common pleas court acquires an interest in moneys, credits or choses -in action which are being litigated in the superior court of Cincinnati, is entitled to come into the case in the latter court and protect his rights therein.

*O’Hiara & Jordan,*for the Motion.

*R. E. Werner,*contra.

Dempsey, J.

Werner, ’by his garnishment in the common pleas-, acquired an interest, by way of assign- • ment, in whatever moneys, credits or choses I in action might be due from the Temmens, executors herein, to Kuehter. Kuehter is lit- ! ¡gating in this court those claims; Werner is j certainly entitled to come in and protect his ’ rights in those claims.

Motion of Temmen, etc., overruled.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Larry G. Gerdes, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Transcend Services, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2004; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];

 

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrols over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: April 30, 2004