alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1031

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 27, 1996

Received

AN ACT

For the relief of Oscar Salas-Velazquez.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 1031 RDS

1 SECTION 1. WAIVER OF GROUNDS FOR DISAPPROVAL OF

2 REQUESTS FOR CLASSIFICATION AND AD3 JUSTMENT OF STATUS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 204(c) of

5 the Immigration and Nationality Act, the Attorney Gen6 eral may not disapprove a petition for classification of

7 Oscar Salas-Velazquez under section 201(b)(2)(A)(i) of

8 such Act, or an application for adjustment of the status

9 of Oscar Salas-Velazquez under section 245 of such Act,

10 on any ground relating to a determination that the mar11 riage of Oscar Salas-Velazquez and Jennifer Christine

12 Brady was entered into for the purpose of evading the im13 migration laws.

14 (b) WAIVER OF INADMISSIBILITY.—Notwithstanding

15 subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) of section 212(a)(6) of

16 the Immigration and Nationality Act, Oscar Salas17 Velazquez may not be considered to be within a class of

18 excludable aliens at any time on or after the date of the

19 enactment of this Act on any ground relating to—

20 (1) a determination that the marriage of Oscar

21 Salas-Velazquez and Jennifer Christine Brady was

22 entered into for the purpose of evading the immigra23 tion laws; or

24 (2) the deportation of Oscar Salas-Velazquez on

25 February 9, 1995.
3

HR 1031 RDS

1 (c) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

2 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural

3 parents, brothers, and sisters of Oscar Salas-Velazquez

4 shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any

5 right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Na6 tionality Act.

7 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

8 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res9 idence to Oscar Salas-Velazquez, the Secretary of State

10 shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, for the

11 current or next following fiscal year, the worldwide level

12 of family-sponsored immigrants under section

13 201(c)(1)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act.

Passed the House of Representatives September 27,

1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
Exhibit 35.9  LOGO

CommercialMortgageServicing D1050-084, 8th Fl
401 South Tryon Street Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334 ANNUAL
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement date d as of November 1, 2016, by
and among CCRE COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, L.P., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, AEGON USA REALTY ADVISORS, LLC, as Potomac Mills Special Servicer,
WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer with
respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, CFCRE 2016-C6 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. Pursuant to Section 10.11 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:  1.
A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2018 through December 31,
2018 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and  2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations
under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has
executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019. LOGOLeslie Hayton
Managing Director
Wells Fargo Bank  Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


LOGO
39883.

#### CHUPP v. DeKALB COUNTY.

Decided February 8, 1963.

*E. T. Hendon, Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*George P. Dillard, Hubert 0. Edwards, Robert E. Mosley,*contra.

Jordan, Judge.

This case being controlled by *Anderson v. DeKalb County,*ante, the judgment of the trial court sustaining the general demurrer to the petition is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Frankum, J., concur.*
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 345.4 Redemption/reinvestment. ( a ) *At maturity.* A certificate may not be called for redemption by the Secretary of the Treasury prior to maturity except when the amount of the unexpended portion of the loan from the Rural Electrification Administration or Rural Telephone Bank is less than the face amount of the certificate. Unless the Treasury has received from the owner, at least one week prior to the maturity date of a certificate, a written request for payment at maturity, it shall automatically redeem the same at maturity, and reinvest in the owner's name the principal amount in a new certificate having the same description in all material respects as the one redeemed. No such automatic reinvestment shall be made, however, in excess of the amount of the unexpended portion of the loan from the Rural Electrification Administration or the Rural Telephone Bank.
( b ) *Prior to maturity.* A certificate may be redeemed prior to maturity at par and accrued interest at the owner's option on one week's notice in writing after one month from the issue date. A certificate issued upon reinvestment, as provided in paragraph (a) of this section, shall not be subject to the one-month holding period. A notice to redeem a certificate prior to its maturity date must be given by the official authorized to redeem it, as shown in the subscription for purchase, to the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, Division of Securities Operations, Washington, DC 20226, by letter or wire.
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.9000-5 Written statement required for requests or demands in non-IRS matters. ( a ) *Written statement.* A request or demand for IRS records or information for use in a non-IRS matter shall be accompanied by a written statement made by or on behalf of the party seeking the testimony or disclosure of IRS records or information, setting forth— ( 1 ) A brief description of the parties to and subject matter of the proceeding and the issues;
( 2 ) A summary of the testimony, IRS records or information sought, the relevance to the proceeding, and the estimated volume of IRS records involved;
( 3 ) The time that will be required to present the testimony (on both direct and cross examination);
( 4 ) Whether any of the IRS records or information is a return or is return information (as defined in section 6103(b) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code)), or tax convention information (as defined in section 6105(c)(1) of the Code), and the statutory authority for the disclosure of the return or return information (and, if no consent to disclose pursuant to section 6103(c) of the Code accompanies the request or demand, the reason consent is not necessary);
( 5 ) Whether a declaration of an IRS officer, employee or contractor under penalties of perjury pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746 would suffice in lieu of deposition or trial testimony;
( 6 ) Whether deposition or trial testimony is necessary in a situation in which IRS records may be authenticated without testimony under applicable rules of evidence and procedure;
( 7 ) Whether IRS records or information are available from other sources; and
( 8 ) A statement that the request or demand allows a reasonable time (generally at least fifteen business days) for compliance.
( b ) *Permissible waiver of statement.* The requirement of a written statement in paragraph (a) of this section may be waived by the authorizing official for good cause.
[T.D. 9178, 70 FR 7397, Feb. 14, 2005]
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1242

To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991

to repeal the provisions relating to the use of asphalt payment containing

recycled rubber.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 15, 1995

Ms. PRYCE (for herself, Mr. PARKER, Mr. MCINNIS, Mr. LINDER, Mr. BAKER

of California, and Mr. OXLEY) introduced the following bill; which was

referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency

Act of 1991 to repeal the provisions relating to the

use of asphalt payment containing recycled rubber.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Highway Mandates

5 Repeal Act of 1995’’.
2

•HR 1242 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF USE OF ASPHALT PAVEMENT CONTAIN2 ING RECYCLED RUBBER.

3 Section 1038(d) of the Intermodal Surface Transpor4 tation Efficiency Act of 1991 (23 U.S.C. 109 note; 105

5 Stat. 1987–1990) is repealed.

Æ
#### § 1023.300 General.

Brokers or dealers in securities are subject to the reporting requirements set forth and cross referenced in this subpart. Brokers or dealers in securities should also refer to subpart C of part 1010 of this chapter for reporting requirements contained in that subpart which apply to brokers or dealers in securities.
Exhibit 35.20



|     |  |  |  |                                                                                                                        
|---- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  |  |  | Corporate Trust Services 
MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045 
Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax:
410 715 2380

Citibank, National Association

388 Greenwich Street

14th Floor

New York, New York 10013



|Re: | Annual Statement of Compliance for CFCRE 2016-C6 Mortgage Trust Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-C6
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2016 (the Agreement), the undersigned, a duly authorized
officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator (Wells Fargo), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the Reporting Period):

(a) A review of Wells Fargos activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such
officers supervision; and

(b) To the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of
its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

March 1, 2017



LOGO

|              
|--------------
|BRIAN SMITH   
|Vice President



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 352.6 [Reserved]
§ 11.4 Establishing vending facilities. ( a ) Treasury bureaus shall not acquire a building by ownership, rent, or lease, or occupy a building to be constructed, substantially altered, or renovated unless it is determined that such buildings contain or will contain a “satisfactory site,” as defined in 34 CFR 395.1(q), for the location and operation of a blind vending facility.
( b ) In accordance with 34 CFR 395.31, Treasury bureaus shall provide the appropriate State licensing agency with written notice of the intention to acquire or otherwise occupy such building. Providing notification shall be the responsibility of the bureau on-site property management official.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1026

To designate the United States Post Office building located at 201 East

Pikes Peak Avenue in Colorado Springs, Colorado, as the ‘‘Winfield

Scott Stratton Post Office’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 23, 1995

Mr. HEFLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

A BILL

To designate the United States Post Office building located

at 201 East Pikes Peak Avenue in Colorado Springs,

Colorado, as the ‘‘Winfield Scott Stratton Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The United States Post Office building located at 201

5 East Pikes Peak Avenue, Colorado Springs, Colorado,

6 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Winfield Scott

7 Stratton Post Office’’.
2

•HR 1026 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the building

4 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

5 to the ‘‘Winfield Scott Stratton Post Office’’.

Æ
#### Jon-Marc DOBRIN, a Professional Corporation, individually and as the assignee of James W. Coulter, Chapter 11 Trustee for Gente Unida, Inc., Western Realty, Glover Russell Cogar, Jr., the Cogar Family Trust and Sunshine Diversified, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 99-55300.

D.C. No. CV-97-09015-CBM.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Dec. 6, 2000.

Decided Feb. 6, 2001.

Before D.W. NELSON, BRUNETTI, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

For the reasons stated in the district court’s orders of May 18 and December 3, 1998, we affirm the court’s finding that res judicata bars the instant action. In so doing, we reject appellant’s contention that a recent change in the controlling principles of law supporting the original judgment precludes the application of res judicata here. *See*18 Charles Alan Wright, Arthur R. Miller & Edward H. Cooper, *Federal Practice and Procedure*§ 4415 (1981) (“Change in the controlling principles of law ordinarily does not warrant denial of claim preclusion.”) (citing cases).

AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
NUMBER 13

- 19

- 00 583

- CR



### COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

JOE ANGEL VILLARREAL

, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 156 th District Court

of Bee County, Texas.



### ORDER

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Hinojosa

Order Per Curiam

Currently pending before the Court is appellant's request to review the record in

the above

- referenced cause. Appellant's counsel has filed an Anders brief herein and

appellant has been unable to examine the record so that he can file a pro se brief.2 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the trial court ensure that appellant has

the opportunit y to fully examine the appellate record on or before May 1, 2020, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the trial court notify this Court as to the date upon which the

appellate record was made available to appellant. See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313

(Tex. Cri m. App. 2014).

Appellant shall have thirty (30) days from the day the appellate record was first

made available to him to file his pro se brief with this Court. The State shall have twenty

days thereafter to file its response, if any.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed t he

7t h day of April, 2020.
#### § 17.101 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to effectuate section 119 of the Rehabilitation, Comprehensive Services, and Developmental Disabilities Amendments of 1978, which amended section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (“section 504”) to prohibit discrimination on the basis of handicap in programs or activities conducted by Executive agencies or the United States Postal Service.
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002I, C.Neil Beer, certify that: 1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of JMAR Technologies, Inc.;  2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this quarterly report (based on such evaluation);and  c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and 5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.         By:                                                            /s/ C.Neil Beer    C. Neil Beer    Chief Executive Officer   November 13, 2006
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF 10-Q REPORT

OF

WESTERN GAS RESOURCES, INC.

 

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2004

 

1.                                       Theundersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer ofWestern Gas Resources, Inc.  ThisCertification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002.  This Certification accompanies the10-Q Report of Western Gas Resources, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2004.

 

2.                                       Wecertify that such 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained in such 10-Q Report fairly represents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Western Gas Resources, Inc.

 

This Certification is executedas of August 9, 2004.

 

 
|   | /s/  PETER A. DEA                                                     |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Peter A.  Dea, Chief Executive Officer                                     |
|   | and  President                                                             |
|   |                                                                       |
|   |                                                                       |
|   | /s/  WILLIAM J. KRYSIAK                                               |   |
|   | William J.  Krysiak, Executive Vice President  and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
§ 28.520 Job classification and structure. A recipient shall not: ( a ) Classify a job as being for males or for females;
( b ) Maintain or establish separate lines of progression, seniority lists, career ladders, or tenure systems based on sex; or
( c ) Maintain or establish separate lines of progression, seniority systems, career ladders, or tenure systems for similar jobs, position descriptions, or job requirements that classify persons on the basis of sex, unless sex is a bona fide occupational qualification for the positions in question as set forth in § 28.550.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0098 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. LIVORIO LOERA,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including August 9 , 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 28 2024

06/28/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0098
#### Jose RESOLME, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

No. 01-3044.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Jan. 18, 2001.

*ORDER*

On December 4, 2000, the court issued an order directing “Resolme ... to show *820cause within 30 days why the Board’s decision should not be summarily affirmed”. The petitioner has failed to respond to that order.'

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The Board’s decision is summarily affirmed.

(2) Resolme’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is moot.

(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 347.1 Applicability.

The regulations in this part apply to retirement savings bonds issued, on behalf of participants, to the IRA custodian for Treasury's retirement savings program and to the Auto-IRA custodians for state Auto-IRA programs.

[82 FR 6246, Jan. 19, 2017]