alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          35,663
<SECURITIES>                                    10,174
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,854
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     17,679
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                84,786
<PP&E>                                         723,522
<DEPRECIATION>                                 159,638
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 662,236
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           48,364
<BONDS>                                        309,512
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     297,841
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   662,236
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               108,074
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   62,613
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,971
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 31,236
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             30,920
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    30,920
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.99
        

</TABLE>
- Home
- Leadership
- Resources
- Remarks and Releases
- Assembly of Local Leaders
- Contact Us

HomeSubnational Diplomacy Unit...Assembly of Local Leaders

# 											Assembly of Local Leaders									

Subnational Diplomacy Unit

The Assembly of Local Leaders (ALL or the Assembly) is a cohort of mayors, governors, and other local officials in the United States. The Assembly is a new venue for the Department of State to engage with local leaders on key issues — the climate crisis, public health, foreign investment, economic development — that affect their communities.

The Assembly includes 22 members from state and local governments in the United States. 

## Membership 

          - Karen Bass, Mayor of Los Angeles, California 
          - Ravinder Bhalla, Mayor of Hoboken, New Jersey 
          - Justin Bibb, Mayor of Cleveland, Ohio 
          - Jerry Dyer, Mayor of Fresno, California 
          - Kate Gallego, Mayor of Phoenix, Arizona 
          - Abdullah Hammoud, Mayor of Dearborn, Michigan 
          - Bruce Harrell, Mayor of Seattle, Washington 
          - David Holt, Mayor of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 
          - Tim Kelly, Mayor of Chattanooga, Tennessee 
          - Quinton Lucas, Mayor of Kansas City, Missouri 
          - Mary Jo McGuire, Commissioner of Ramsey County, Minnesota 
          - Dillon Meek, Mayor of Waco, Texas 
          - Phil Murphy, Governor of New Jersey 
          - Ron Nirenberg, Mayor of San Antonio, Texas 
          - Mattie Parker, Mayor of Fort Worth, Texas 
          - Shawyn Patterson-Howard, Mayor of Mount Vernon, New York 
          - Satya Rhodes-Conway, Mayor of Madison, Wisconsin 
          - Regina Romero, Mayor of Tucson, Arizona 
          - Katie Rosenberg, Mayor of Wausau, Wisconsin 
          - Hillary Schieve, Mayor of Reno, Nevada 
          - Caroline Simmons, Mayor of Stamford, Connecticut 
          - Levar Stoney, Mayor of Richmond, Virginia

## Meetings 

The Assembly meets quarterly to share perspectives on global issues. Summaries of these meetings are publicly available and can be found below.

## Contact Us

If you have further questions about the Assembly, please contact the Subnational Diplomacy Unit via email: **Subnational@state.gov**.

Tags

Subnational Diplomacy Unit

Back to Top
H. R. 1380

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the fourth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-five

An Act

To provide a moratorium on certain class action lawsuits relating to the Truth

in Lending Act.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Truth in Lending Class Action

Relief Act of 1995’’.

SEC. 2. MORATORIUM.

Section 130 of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1640)

is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

‘‘(i) CLASS ACTION MORATORIUM.—

‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—During the period beginning on the date

of the enactment of the Truth in Lending Class Action Relief

Act of 1995 and ending on October 1, 1995, no court may

enter any order certifying any class in any action under this

title—

‘‘(A) which is brought in connection with any credit

transaction not under an open end credit plan which is

secured by a first lien on real property or a dwelling and

constitutes a refinancing or consolidation of an existing

extension of credit; and

‘‘(B) which is based on the alleged failure of a creditor— ‘‘(i) to include a charge actually incurred (in connection with the transaction) in the finance charge

disclosed pursuant to section 128;

‘‘(ii) to properly make any other disclosure required

under section 128 as a result of the failure described

in clause (i); or

‘‘(iii) to provide proper notice of rescission rights under section 125(a) due to the selection by the creditor

of the incorrect form from among the model forms

prescribed by the Board or from among forms based

on such model forms.

‘‘(2) EXCEPTIONS FOR CERTAIN ALLEGED VIOLATIONS.—Paragraph (1) shall not apply with respect to any action—

‘‘(A) described in clause (i) or (ii) of paragraph (1)(B),

if the amount disclosed as the finance charge results in

an annual percentage rate that exceeds the tolerance provided in section 107(c); or
H. R. 1380—2

‘‘(B) described in paragraph (1)(B)(iii), if—

‘‘(i) no notice relating to rescission rights under

section 125(a) was provided in any form; or

‘‘(ii) proper notice was not provided for any reason

other than the reason described in such paragraph.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

April 19, 2024

CR-2022-1164

Reginald Lamar Bonner v. State of Alabama (Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court: 

CC-21-240 and CC-21-242 

NOTICE 

You are hereby notified that on April 19, 2024, the following action was taken 

in the above-referenced cause by the Court of Criminal Appeals:

Application for Rehearing Overruled.

D. Scott Mitchell, Clerk
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 380.4 What collateral may I pledge instead of a surety bond under 31 CFR part 225, and what value will you assign to it?

Unless we specify otherwise, we will list the types and valuation of acceptable collateral in Treasury procedural instructions. We will also post updated information and guidance on Treasury's Bureau of the Fiscal Service website at *fiscal.treasury.gov*.

[89 FR 3353, Jan. 18, 2024]
www.gpo.gov

### §1027. Retention of records

Every person subject to a requirement to file any report or to certify any information therefor under this subchapter or who would be subject to such a requirement but for an exemption or simplified reporting requirement under section 1024(a)(2) or (3) of this title shall maintain records on the matters of which disclosure is required which will provide in sufficient detail the necessary basic information and data from which the documents thus required may be verified, explained, or clarified, and checked for accuracy and completeness, and shall include vouchers, worksheets, receipts, and applicable resolutions, and shall keep such records available for examination for a period of not less than six years after the filing date of the documents based on the information which they contain, or six years after the date on which such documents would have been filed but for an exemption or simplified reporting requirement under section 1024(a)(2) or (3) of this title.

(Pub. L. 93–406, title I, §107, Sept. 2, 1974, 88 Stat. 850; Pub. L. 105–34, title XV, §1503(d)(5), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 1062.)

#### Amendments

1997—Pub. L. 105–34 struck out “description or” after “requirement to file any”.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

MEMORANDUM 

Subject: 

From: 

To: 

ummary of takeholder Meetings 

Carissa Cyran 

Dockets EPA-IIQ-OAR-20 13-0602. EPA-HQ-OAR-20 13-0603. and EPA-HQOAR-20 13-0495 

This memorandum summarizes meetings with stakeholders during the week of June 8, 2015. 

On June 9. Acting Assistant Administrator lo r Air and Radiation Janet McCabe and Associate 

Assistant Administrator for Climate and enior Counsel for Air and Radiation Joseph GotTman 

spoke with Tom Lawler. 

On June 9, Acti ng Assistant Administrator lor Air and Radiation Janet McCabe and Associate 

Assistant Administrator for Climate and Senior Counsel for Air and Radiation Joseph Goffman 

met with Michael Bradley. President of M.J. Bradley and Associates LLC. 

On June 9. Administrator Gina McCarthy. Acting Assistant Admi nistrator for Air and Radiati on 

Janet McCabe and Associate Assistant Administrator lor Climate and Senior Counsel for Air and 

Radiation Joseph Goffman met with Greg Abel of Berkshire Hathaway Energy. 

Internet Address (URLJ • hllp //www epa gov 

Recyc led/Rec yc lable • Pnnted W•th Vegetable Otl Based Inks on 100"• Postconsumer Process Chlo,ne Free Recycled Paper
Exhibit 32.1

                          CEO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Emclaire Financial Corp. (the
Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here (the Report), I, David L.
Cox, Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Corporation.


/s/ David L. Cox
----------------

David L. Cox
Chief Executive Officer


August 11, 2005
#### Sue HUNT, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Douglas Richard LAINER, Plaintiff, v. Frederick P. TURNER; David C. Henderson; John M. Haynes; Raymond P. Gonzales; Phil Coleman; Davis Police Department; City of Davis, California; County of Yolo, Sacramento, Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 98-17050, 98-17256.

D.C. No. CV-94-00183-WBS.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 12, 2001.1

Decided Feb. 21, 2001.

Before LEAYY, THOMAS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM2

In these consolidated appeals, Sue Hunt appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of the defendants and from the district court’s order denying her motion to retax costs imposed against her. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

We review for an abuse of discretion evidentiary questions, even those decided in the context of summary judgment. *See School Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah*
      *435
      *County, Or. v. ACandS, Inc.,*5 F.3d 1255, 1261 (9th Cir.1993).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in determining that Hunt’s documents submitted in opposition to summary judgment were not sufficiently authenticated. *See Beyene v. Coleman Sec. Servs., Inc.,*854 F.2d 1179, 1181 (9th Cir.1988) (holding it was not sufficient authentication merely to attach an affidavit to evidence referring to the documents as true copies).

Hunt contends that the district court erred in not allowing her additional time to correct the authentication problem. This contention lacks merit because Hunt did not ask for additional time before the summary judgment order issued. In addition, the district court was not required to provide guidance to Hunt regarding the evidentiary issue. *See Jacobsen v. Filler,*790 F.2d 1362, 1364 (9th Cir.1986).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Hunt’s motion for reconsideration from the summary judgment order. *See School Dist. No. 1J,*5 F.3d at 1262.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in taxing the deposition costs to Hunt. *See Alflex Corp. v. Underwriters Labs., Inc.,*914 F.2d 175, 177 (9th Cir.1990) (per curiam).

AFFIRMED.

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
§ 33.132 Waiver extension. ( a ) *Extension.* A State may request continuation of an approved section 1332 waiver, and such request shall be deemed granted unless the Secretary and the Secretary of Health and Human Services, within 90 days after the date of submission of a complete waiver extension request to the Secretary and the Secretary of Health and Human Services, either denies such request in writing or informs the State in writing with respect to any additional information that is needed in order to make a final determination with respect to the request.
( b ) [Reserved]
[86 FR 53502, Sept. 27, 2021]
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 370.35 Does the Bureau of the Fiscal Service accept all electronically signed transaction requests?

An electronic signature will not be accepted if it has not been accomplished through a method that has been approved for specific purposes by us.
Exhibit 32.1
                                                               ------------

             STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
             SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, Mary Lynn D. Lenz, is the President and Chief Executive
Officer of Slade's Ferry Bancorp. (the "Company"). This statement is being
furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the
"Report").

By execution of this statement, I certify that:

      1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
            U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

      2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
            covered by the Report.

This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so
that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not
intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


DATE:  May 12, 2005                    /S/ MARY LYNN D. LENZ
       ------------                    -------------------------------------
                                       MARY LYNN D. LENZ
                                       PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


<PAGE>
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 134

To suspend Federal education benefits to individuals convicted of drug

offenses.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. SOLOMON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities

A BILL

To suspend Federal education benefits to individuals

convicted of drug offenses.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR DRUG4 RELATED OFFENSES.

5 Section 484 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20

6 U.S.C. 1091) is amended by adding at the end thereof

7 the following new subsection:

8 ‘‘(q) SUSPENSION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR DRUG9 RELATED OFFENSES.—
2

•HR 134 IH

1 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—An individual student who

2 has been convicted of any offense under any Federal

3 or State law involving the possession or sale of a

4 controlled substance shall not be eligible to receive

5 any grant, loan, or work assistance under this title

6 during the period beginning on the date of such con7 viction and ending after the interval specified in the

8 following table:

‘‘If convicted of an offense involving:

The possession of a controlled substance: Ineligibility period is:

1st offense ................................................ 1 year

2nd offense ............................................... 2 years

3rd offense ................................................ indefinite

The sale of a controlled substance:

1st offense ................................................ 2 years

2nd offense ............................................... indefinite

9 ‘‘(2) REHABILITATION.—A student whose eligi10 bility has been suspended under paragraph (1) may

11 resume eligibility before the end of the period deter12 mined under such paragraph if the student satisfac13 torily completes a drug rehabilitation program that

14 complies with such criteria as the Secretary shall

15 prescribe for purposes of this paragraph.

16 ‘‘(3) DEFINITIONS.—As used in this subsection,

17 the term ‘controlled substance’ has the meaning

18 given in section 102(6) of the Controlled Substances

19 Act (21 U.S.C. 802(6)).’’.
3

•HR 134 IH

1 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 The amendment made by section 1 shall apply with

3 respect to financial assistance to cover the costs of attend4 ance for periods of enrollment beginning after the date

5 of enactment of this Act.

Æ
§ 510.517 Certain transactions related to patents, trademarks, copyrights, and other intellectual property. ( a ) All of the following transactions in connection with a patent, trademark, copyright, or other form of intellectual property protection in the United States or North Korea are authorized, including exportation of services to North Korea, payment for such services, and payment to persons in North Korea directly connected to such intellectual property protection: ( 1 ) The filing and prosecution of any application to obtain a patent, trademark, copyright, or other form of intellectual property protection;
( 2 ) The receipt of a patent, trademark, copyright, or other form of intellectual property protection;
( 3 ) The renewal or maintenance of a patent, trademark, copyright, or other form of intellectual property protection; and
( 4 ) The filing and prosecution of any opposition or infringement proceeding with respect to a patent, trademark, copyright, or other form of intellectual property protection, or the entrance of a defense to any such proceeding.
( b ) This section authorizes the payment of fees to the U.S. Government or the Government of North Korea, and of the reasonable and customary fees and charges to attorneys or representatives within the United States or North Korea, in connection with the transactions authorized in paragraph (a) of this section, except that payment effected pursuant to the terms of this paragraph (b) may not be made from a blocked account.
Exhibit 10.21


AMENDMENT TO CHANGE IN CONTROL SEVERANCE AGREEMENT

 


AMENDMENT dated as of February 22, 2007 to Change in Control
Severance Agreement (the “Severance Agreement”) between Pfizer Inc.
(the “Company”)
and ______________ (the “Executive”).


WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive entered into the Severance Agreement; and 


WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive wish to amend the provision of the Severance Agreement relating to the severance payment; 


NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed as follows: 

	
1.     	
The first sentence of the first paragraph of Section 4(iv)(B) of the Severance Agreement is amended in its entirety to read as follows: “The Company shall pay you, on a date that is no later than the fifth day
following the Date of Termination, as severance pay to you a severance payment equal to 2.99 times the sum of (i) your full base salary and (ii) your annual incentive payment, in each case in effect at the time the Notice of Termination is
given.”

  
	 
	
2.	
The second paragraph of Section 4(iv)(B) of the Severance Agreement is deleted in its entirety.

  
	 
	
3.	
The Severance Agreement, as previously amended and as amended in Sections 1 and 2 hereof, shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.

  



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Executive have voluntarily caused this Amendment to be signed as of the day and year first above written. 


PFIZER INC. 

	By	
 


	 
	 	 Margaret M. Foran
  	 
	 	 Senior Vice President-Corporate Governance,
  	 
	 	 Associate General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
  	 
	 	 

  	 
	 	 

  	 
	 	 

  	 
	 	 

  	 
	
    EXECUTIVE
#### § 29.352 Refunded contributions.

For any given pay period, employee contributions are considered to have been made before the freeze date if the pay date was on or before June 30, 1997. As a result, for calendar year 1997, Treasury will fund refunds of employee contributions made by teachers through pay period 12 and fund refunds of employee contributions made by police officers and firefighters through pay period 13. If pay period records are unavailable for calendar year 1997, and the participant separated on or before June 30, 1997, Treasury will fund 100 percent of the refund of retirement contributions. If pay period records are unavailable for calendar year 1997, and the participant was hired before January 1, 1997, and separated after December 31, 1997, Treasury will fund 50 percent of the refund of retirement contributions made to teachers in calendar year 1997, and 48 percent of the retirement contributions made to police officers or firefighters in calendar year 1997. Otherwise, if the participant separated after June 30, 1997, the percent of contributions made in calendar year 1997 funded by Treasury is assumed to be the ratio where the numerator is the number of days before July 1 the participant was employed in calendar year 1997 and the denominator is the number of days the participant was employed in calendar year 1997.