alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 50.12 Clear and conspicuous disclosure. ( a ) *General.* Whether a disclosure is clear and conspicuous depends on the totality of the facts and circumstances of the disclosure. See § 50.16 for model forms.
( b ) *Description of premium.* An insurer may describe the premium charged for insured losses covered by the Program as a portion or percentage of a policy premium, if consistent with standard business practice and provided that the amount of policy premium or the method of determining the policy premium is also stated. An insurer may not describe the premium in a manner that is misleading in the context of the Program, such as by characterizing the premium as a “surcharge.”
( c ) *Method of disclosure.* Subject to § 50.10(b), an insurer may provide disclosures using normal business practices, including forms and methods of communication used to communicate similar policyholder information to policyholders.
( d ) *Use of producer.* If an insurer normally communicates with a policyholder through an insurance producer or other intermediary, an insurer may provide disclosures through such producer or other intermediary. If an insurer elects to make the disclosures through an insurance producer or other intermediary, the insurer remains responsible for ensuring that the disclosures are provided by the insurance producer or other intermediary to policyholders in accordance with the Act.
( e ) *Demonstration of compliance.* An insurer may demonstrate that it has satisfied the requirement to provide clear and conspicuous disclosure as described in § 50.10 through use of appropriate systems and normal business practices that demonstrate a practice of compliance.
( f ) *Certification of compliance.* An insurer must certify that it has complied with the requirement to provide disclosure to the policyholder on all policies that form the basis for any claim that is submitted by an insurer for Federal payment under the Program.
InThe Matter Of: 

### SERVED: AUGUST 9, 2013 U.S. DEPARTMENTOF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC

DocketNo. FAA-2012-0477 LIBERTY FOUNDATION, INC. ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2011 GL-03-0070 Respondent ' > ,-

. •\ .

·-**~·** ·._.!**~**

ORDERTEMPORARILY GRANTING RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO STAYTIME TO FILE ANSWERAND RESERVING RULING ON OTHERREQUESTED RELIEF On July 31, 2013 the FAA filed an Amendment to Complaint. On August 5, 2013 an Order Granting Respondent's Motionto Compel was filed. OnAugust 7, 2013 the Respondent filed Respondent's Motion to Stay orRevise Scheduling Order due to NewAllegations in Complainant's Amendment to Complaint, [Motion] to Allow Respondent to Take Discovery on the NewIssues Raised inthe Complaint, [Motion] to Order Complainantto Disclose its Witnesses and Documents Related to the Amendment, and [Motion] to Stay the Requirement to Answerthe Amendment Pending Resolution ofthis Motion. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §13.214 and 14 C.F.R. §13.218(d), and afterreviewing all relevant caselaw, decisions, regulation, statutory authority, motions, pleadings, and being fully advised;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Respondent's Motionto Stay Time to File Answer is partially granted. The twenty daytime for the Respondent to file an Answer to the FAA's Amended Complaint is temporarily stayed pending the FAA's filing ofa Response to the Motions and the administrative court's ruling upon the same. 2. August 17,2013: FAA Motion Response Deadline. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §13.21S(d), the FAA shall its Response to the Respondent's August 7, 2013 Motions onorbeforeAugust 17, 2013.3. The Respondent's otherrequests for relief, contained inthe Respondent's August 7, 2013 Motion filing, are reserved for ruling pending receipt ofthe FAA's Response to the Motions.

Attachment: Service ListFDMS No. FAA-2012-0477 SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration1 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000

Mr. Christopher Stevenson, Esq. Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel P.O. Box 20636 Atlanta, GA 30320 TEL: 404-305-5200 FAX: 404-305-5223 Mr. Stuart A. Goldstein, Esq. Respondent's Counsel StuartA. Goldstein, P.A. 9350 South Dixie Highway, lOth Floor Miami, FL 33156 TEL: 305-670-1222 FAX: 305-670-7065 Judge J.E. Sullivan U S. Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation ONE COPY

1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2132 FAX: 202-366-7536

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
§ 29.342 Computed annuity exceeds the statutory maximum. ( a ) In cases in which the total computed annuity exceeds the statutory maximum: ( 1 ) Federal Benefit Payments may equal total benefits even if the employee had service after June 30, 1997.
( 2 ) If the employee had sufficient service as of June 30, 1997, to qualify for the maximum annuity under the plan, the Federal Benefit Payment is the maximum annuity under the plan. This will be the entire benefit except for any amount in excess of the normal maximum due to unused sick leave, which is the responsibility of the District. (See example 3, of appendix A of this subpart.)
( b ) If the employee did not perform sufficient service as of June 30, 1997, to reach the statutory maximum benefit, but has sufficient service at actual retirement to exceed the statutory maximum, the Federal Benefit Payment is the amount earned through June 30, 1997. The District benefit payment is the amount by which the total benefit payable exceeds the Federal Benefit Payment.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

###### Editorial Note on Part 357

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 357 appear at 70 FR 57431, Sept. 30, 2005.

#### § 357.29 Time required for processing transaction request.

For purposes of a transaction request affecting payment instructions with respect to a security, a proper request must be received not less than ten (10) business days preceding the next payment date. If a transaction request is received less than ten (10) business days preceding a payment date, the Department may in its discretion act on such request if sufficient time remains for processing. If a transaction request is received too late for completion of the requested transaction, the transaction request will be acted upon with respect to future payments only.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1535-0068)

[51 FR 18265, May 16, 1986, as amended at 62 FR 18694, Apr. 16, 1997]
HomeDiplomatic Security Service Memorial...Charles Wayne  Turberville

# 				Charles Wayne  Turberville			

				U.S. Military–Marine Security Guard			

Deceased				September 26, 1971			

**U.S. Government image**Back to DSS Memorial

Tags

CambodiaDiplomatic Security Service Memorial

Back to Top
BATHYMETRIC MAP

st,

.

oa mat Ales iat] ieee | aaa) pee | cae a) id. “venil rer
: . . howe | tae | pe am
” “ wv - o * eo = = ” ” wr a | =
| ; Rae . 7 P = 7 | = 7 > 7
x == we. Em
“ ” « Le * - - = “ - we “\ t | We ~ " | & a pe
= P| =
7) — 2.
a a eo Mr) the ac We [os [one | mc] pm! bone cf ane
\ .
\ ‘ =
we [cia tm Povee | uae | pe Xx = Ca ae
we) ve Sl ie aa | ae) toe
ra arr a eee | eek] ae | aoe
. : .
we | see Taar | pee []oaen aoe | oer
bel a | ae we | ae on ~ |
wy | se | am | oe [ae | aw “pe
a0) ame pw | ae) baer as = | ae
oe | me | ae ts -— |) =) ae
od call MI tl oe 0 Be)
.
TN ee ar ener
ee ee) “
a wy a ee ee =
we a | eae
beat Mibaidl [Aeneid Wana TM Ue 98) lconcll iG, Ec TN
7 | er
| ow
a ab
om | te
oe | ena)
a Lu
a
ice = ea a

at

ne me termes vain terhymaiy nat cept Oy 2 Reena terra
<n —_

Some ee ee ereves snes mae MES phase weny mame iene
we
bo co) ‘Sere - _

noe ne 2 ae ee oe tee Thy me te ee a

wae
Nene Tresteres Mower Chad bene) VD mer tots | on phone am

Dhyhe ew eran herve ima em = St, remedy et Ur Myr Se
ae meet er teen mene! a haw Caroma baw Dea Reenaee Drage
Fo aren a mew ow he Rae Leng potatoe PO tr at
02 Sco Orie! Fametr Dagon talenme ben te Moweh Mmm See =

Ridlahed oo Wonherguey BIE

US DEPARFMENT OF COMMERCE

WANOWAL OCEANIC AND AIMDUPENT ADWNEETEATION
WATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE

AAITYMETET CONTOUR HATERAALA 10 METERS TO MAMMAL DEE
Wr Meen er) METER ETHIE

DATUM SEAM LOMER LOW wate

‘TekeivOnE MERCATOR PRDLECTON
Sead Nase

ST. PAUL NORTH

NOS NO 2-4
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Chaz Zachary, Appellant.

[808 NYS2d 99]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered October 11, 2001, convicting him of manslaughter in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The testimony of a detective that the defendant’s name came up in the course of investigating the criminal occurrence was not improper *(see People v Brown,*262 AD2d 570 [1999], *affd*95 NY2d 776 [2000]; *People v Williams,*193 AD2d 826, 827-828 [1993]; *People v Armstead,*134 AD2d 601 [1987]). Also, the trial court promptly cured any prejudice resulting from the detective’s testimony about a reference to the defendant made by a nontestifying witness when it instructed the jury to consider this evidence only for the purpose of understanding the detective’s conduct in response thereto *(see People v Elliott,*256 AD2d 418 [1998]; *People v Griffin,*246 AD2d 668 [1998]).

*507The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Schmidt, J.P., Cozier, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2554 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2554

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
    coastwise trade and on the Great Lakes and their tributary and 
 connecting waters in trade with Canada for the vessel M/V MARION C II.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 26, 1995

  Mr. Saxton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
    coastwise trade and on the Great Lakes and their tributary and 
 connecting waters in trade with Canada for the vessel M/V MARION C II.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883) and 
sections 12106 and 12107 of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary 
of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation with 
appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade and on 
the Great Lakes and their tributary and connecting waters in trade with 
Canada for the vessel M/V MARION C II (United States official number 
570892).
                                 <all>
```
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 380.1 What special definitions apply to this part?

Special definitions that may apply to this part are contained in 31 CFR parts 202, 203 and 225.
HomeReports – Bureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and Stability...Adherence to and Compliance with Arms Control, Nonproliferation, and Disarmament Agreements and Commitments

# 									Adherence to and Compliance with Arms Control, Nonproliferation, and Disarmament Agreements and Commitments							

Report

Pursuant to statute (22 U.S.C. § 2593a), the Department of State prepares a report providing a detailed assessment of the adherence of the United States and other nations to obligations undertaken in all arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament agreements or commitments to which the United States is a participating state. The report is prepared with the concurrence of the U.S. Intelligence Community and in consultation with the U.S. Departments of Defense and Energy, and the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

## 2024 Compliance Report

        -  2024 Adherence to and Compliance with Arms Control, Nonproliferation, and Disarmament Agreements and Commitments 
        - Condition 10(c) Report
        - New START Implementation Report

## 2023 Compliance Report

        - 2023 Adherence to and Compliance with Arms Control, Nonproliferation, and Disarmament Agreements and Commitments [534 KB]
        - Condition 10(c) Report
        - New START Implementation Report [510 KB]

## 2022 Compliance Report

        - 2022 Adherence to and Compliance with Arms Control, Nonproliferation, and Disarmament Agreements and Commitments [556 KB]
        - Condition 10 (c) Report [2 MB]
        - Condition 5 (c) Report [187 KB]
        - New START Treaty Implementation Report [202 KB]

## 2021 Compliance Report

        - 2021 Adherence to and Compliance With Arms Control, Nonproliferation, and Disarmament Agreements and Commitments
        - 2021 Adherence to and Compliance with Arms Control, Nonproliferation, and Disarmament Agreements and Commitments [571 KB]
        - Condition 10 (c) Report [1 MB]
        - Condition 5 (c) Report [288 KB]
        - New START Treaty Annual Implementation Report [249 KB]

## 2020 Compliance Reports

        - 2020 Adherence to and Compliance with Arms Control, Nonproliferation, and Disarmament Agreements and Commitments [695 KB]
        - Executive Summary of the 2020 Compliance Report
        - Condition 10 (c) Report [5 MB]
        -  Condition 5 (c) Report [185 KB]

Compliance, 10(c) and 5 (c) Reports 2017-2020Compliance, 10(c) and 5 (c) Reports 2012-2016***Note: the 2012 page has links to some reports before 2011.***

Tags

Bureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and Stability

Back to Top
§ 19.350 What must I do if I learn of information required under § 19.335 after entering into a covered transaction with the Department of the Treasury? At any time after you enter into a covered transaction, you must give immediate written notice to the Department of the Treasury office with which you entered into the transaction if you learn either that— ( a ) You failed to disclose information earlier, as required by § 19.335; or
( b ) Due to changed circumstances, you or any of the principals for the transaction now meet any of the criteria in § 19.335.
577 P.2d 275

#### STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Joe Donald WALKER, Appellant.

No. 1 CA-CR 2736.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department C.

March 28, 1978.

*425Bruce E. Babbitt, Atty. Gen., William J. Schafer, III, Chief Counsel, Criminal Division, Phoenix, for appellee.

Ross P. Lee, Maricopa County Public Defender by Michael G. Sullivan, Deputy Public Defender, Phoenix, for appellant.

OPINION

WREN, Judge.

Defendant through his court appointed counsel has filed an appeal under *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), requesting a review by this Court of the revocation proceedings as to his probation and the sentence which followed.

On June 28, 1976 defendant was placed on probation for a period of three years. The petition to revoke alleged that defendant had violated the following terms of probation:

> Term No. 1: “At all times to be a law-abiding citizen.”

> Term No. 2: “Report to the probation officer at least once each month in writing or in person and at all other times directed by the probation officer.”

> Term No. 7: “Make and pay restitution . in the amount of $50.00. . . ”

The petition further stated that appellant had violated Term No. 1 in that he committed an armed robbery on March 21, 1977. It also alleged that he violated Term No. 2 by failing to report to the probation officer during December of 1976 and February 1977; and finally that he had violated Term No. 7 by failing to make restitution.

Defendant, although the matter is not urged as “arguable error”, points to the fact that the armed robbery charge had been dismissed twice at the preliminary hearing stage and yet the alleged robbery victim was presented as a witness at the revocation proceedings and the trial court found a violation of Term No. 1 as a result thereof.

The point, if such be intended, is not well taken. The nature of a preliminary hearing, the issues involved, and the quantum of proof required for a determination of probable cause as to armed robbery presented no double jeopardy or res judicata problems as to whether defendant had violated the condition of being a law abiding citizen. *See Russ*v. *State,*313 So.2d 758 (Fla.1975), cert. den. 423 U.S. 924, 96 S.Ct. 267, 46 L.Ed.2d 250 (1975). *See also*Annot., 76 A.L.R.3d 564 (1977).

Moreover, there was adequate evidence to support the court’s determination that defendant had also violated Terms No. 2 and No. 7. These together or alone would have justified the revocation.

This Court has reviewed the transcripts of the proceedings. We have determined that the requirements of Rule 27 were fully complied with and that a sentence within the statutory limits'was imposed.

The applicant himself was given an opportunity to file a supplemental memorandum raising any points he might have wished to call to our attention but has failed to do so.

We have therefore determined that the appeal is without merit and affirm.

DONOFRIO, P. J., and SCHROEDER, J., concur.
42264 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 161 / Friday, August 21, 2009 / Notices 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 

[FR Doc. E9–20018 Filed 8–20–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal Nos. 09–42] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601– 

3740. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittals 09–42 

with attached transmittal, policy 

justification, and sensitivy of 

technology. 

Dated: August 12, 2009. 

Patricia L. Toppings, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, 

Department of Defense. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 161 / Friday, August 21, 2009 / Notices 42265 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICESEN21AU09.047</GPH>
42266 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 161 / Friday, August 21, 2009 / Notices 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICESEN21AU09.048</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 161 / Friday, August 21, 2009 / Notices 42267 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICESEN21AU09.049</GPH>
42268 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 161 / Friday, August 21, 2009 / Notices 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICESEN21AU09.050</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 161 / Friday, August 21, 2009 / Notices 42269 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICESEN21AU09.051</GPH>
42270 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 161 / Friday, August 21, 2009 / Notices 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICESEN21AU09.052</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 161 / Friday, August 21, 2009 / Notices 42271 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICESEN21AU09.053</GPH>
42272 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 161 / Friday, August 21, 2009 / Notices 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 

[FR Doc. E9–20012 Filed 8–20–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE BILLING 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal Nos. 09–40] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601– 

3740. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittals 09–40 

with attached transmittal, policy 

justification, and Sensitivity of 

Technology. 

Dated: August 12, 2009. 

Patricia L. Toppings, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, 

Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2504 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 2504

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 18, 1995

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To designate the Federal Building located at the corner of Patton 
  Avenue and Otis Street, and the United States Courthouse located on 
Otis Street, in Asheville, North Carolina, as the ``Veach-Baley Federal 
                               Complex''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at the corner of Patton Avenue and 
Otis Street, and the United States Courthouse located on Otis Street, 
in Asheville, North Carolina, shall be known and designated as the 
``Veach-Baley Federal Complex''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the buildings referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Veach-Baley Federal 
Complex''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 18 
      (legislative day, December 15), 1995.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```