alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      15,888,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       4,986,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             1,341,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 49,683,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      20,195,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        20,032,000
<LOANS>                                    183,011,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,974,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             287,167,000
<DEPOSITS>                                 230,750,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                13,277,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          3,118,000
<LONG-TERM>                                 18,067,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,932,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             287,167,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              7,749,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,743,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               441,000
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             9,933,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           4,511,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,186,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        4,747,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  234,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              4,953,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,003,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,003,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   625,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.26
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.86
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,455,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   138,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              2,897,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,915,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  203,000
<RECOVERIES>                                    28,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,974,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,974,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      1,974,000


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000             SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         958,676                 958,676
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   57,030                  57,030
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,015,706               1,015,706
<PP&E>                                       2,135,739               2,135,739
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,859,291               1,859,291
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,489,132               1,489,132
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          789,647                 789,647
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                  8,062,272               8,062,272
<COMMON>                                    31,590,356              31,590,356
<OTHER-SE>                                (39,369,810)            (39,369,810)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,489,132               1,489,132
<SALES>                                              0                   3,011
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               125,876                 664,445
<CGS>                                                4                       4
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               852,578               2,788,760
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,441                   6,124
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (726,702)             (2,124,315)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (726,702)             (2,124,315)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (726,702)             (2,124,315)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.04)                  (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)                  (0.13)


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Julio Medina, Appellant.

[803 NYS2d 909]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ira Globerman, J.), rendered on or about June 26, 2003, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Friedman, Sullivan and Malone, JJ.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1223

To amend the Act of June 15, 1938, to extend the authority of the Secretary

of Agriculture to purchase lands within the boundaries of certain National Forests in the State of California to include the Angeles National

Forest and to expand the purposes for which such purchases may be

made.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 14, 1995

Mr. BROWN of California introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Resources

A BILL

To amend the Act of June 15, 1938, to extend the authority

of the Secretary of Agriculture to purchase lands within

the boundaries of certain National Forests in the State

of California to include the Angeles National Forest and

to expand the purposes for which such purchases may

be made.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1223 IH

1 SECTION 1. LAND ACQUISITION AUTHORITY FOR SAN

2 BERNARDINO, CLEVELAND, AND ANGELES

3 NATIONAL FORESTS, CALIFORNIA.

4 The Act of June 15, 1938 (Chapter 438; 52 Stat.

5 699), as amended by the Act of May 26, 1944 (58 Stat.

6 227), is further amended—

7 (1) by striking ‘‘San Bernardino and Cleve8 land’’ and inserting ‘‘San Bernardino, Cleveland,

9 and Angeles’’;

10 (2) by striking ‘‘county of Riverside’’ each place

11 it appears and inserting ‘‘counties of Riverside and

12 San Bernardino’’; and

13 (3) by striking ‘‘as to minimize soil erosion and

14 flood damage’’ and inserting ‘‘for National Forest

15 System purposes’’.

Æ
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1099

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to limit the applicability

of the generation-skipping transfer tax.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 1, 1995

Mr. HOUGHTON (for himself, Mr. BREWSTER, Mr. SHAW, and Mr. JACOBS)

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on

Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to limit the

applicability of the generation-skipping transfer tax.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON APPLICABILITY OF GENERA4 TION-SKIPPING TRANSFER TAX.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2651 of the Internal Rev6 enue Code of 1986 (relating to generation assignment) is

7 amended by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (f),

8 and by inserting after subsection (d) the following new

9 subsection:
2

•HR 1099 IH

1 ‘‘(e) SPECIAL RULE FOR PERSONS WITH A DE2 CEASED PARENT.—

3 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of determin4 ing whether any transfer is a generation-skipping

5 transfer, if—

6 ‘‘(A) an individual who has an interest in

7 property is a descendant of a parent of the

8 transferor (or the transferor’s spouse or former

9 spouse), and

10 ‘‘(B) such individual’s parent who is a lin11 eal descendant of the parent of the transferor

12 (or the transferor’s spouse or former spouse) is

13 dead at the time the transfer from which such

14 interest is established or derived is subject to a

15 tax imposed by chapter 11 or 12 upon the

16 transferor (and if there shall be more than 1

17 such time, then at the latest such time),

18 such individual shall be treated as if such individual

19 were a member of the generation which is 1 genera20 tion below the lower of the transferor’s generation or

21 the generation assignment of the youngest living an22 cestor of such individual who is also a descendant of

23 the parent of the transferor (or the transferor’s

24 spouse or former spouse), and the generation assign-
3

•HR 1099 IH

1 ment of any descendant of such individual shall be

2 adjusted accordingly.

3 ‘‘(2) LIMITED APPLICATION OF SUBSECTION TO

4 COLLATERAL HEIRS.—This subsection shall not

5 apply to any individual who is not a lineal descend6 ant of the transferor (or the transferor’s spouse or

7 former spouse) if, at the time of the transfer, such

8 transferor has any living lineal descendant.’’

9 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

10 (1) Section 2612(c) of the Internal Revenue

11 Code of 1986 (defining direct skip) is amended by

12 striking paragraph (2) and by redesignating para13 graph (3) as paragraph (2).

14 (2) Section 2612(c)(2) of such Code (as so re15 designated) is amended by striking ‘‘section

16 2651(e)(2)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 2651(f)(2)’’.

17 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

18 this section shall apply to terminations, distributions, and

19 transfers occurring on or after January 1, 1995.

Æ
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID** 

### 07278 **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  

### 07278\07278_ Completeness Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 07278\07278_ HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted 

### x 07278\07278_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook 

### x 07278\07278_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 07278\07278_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 07278\07278_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 07278\Supporting Documents\07278_Aerial Map of PRL.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 07278\Supporting Documents\07278_Water Balance Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey



### 07278\07278_Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement 

### 07278\07278_Cover Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Exhibit 10.1


Named
Executive Officer Salary Actions


 


	
  Name

  	
   

  	
  2006 Salary

  	
   

  	
  Increase

  	
   

  	
  Percentage Increase

  	
   

  	
  2007 Salary*

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  John D. Finnegan

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  1,275,000

  	
   

  	
  —

  	
   

  	
  —

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  1,275,000

  	
   

  
	
  John J. Degnan

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  645,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  32,250

  	
   

  	
  5

  	
  %

  	
  $

  	
  677,250

  	
   

  
	
  Thomas F. Motamed

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  725,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  36,250

  	
   

  	
  5

  	
  %

  	
  $

  	
  761,250

  	
   

  
	
  Michael O’Reilly

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  670,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  33,500

  	
   

  	
  5

  	
  %

  	
  $

  	
  703,500

  	
   

  
	
  Paul J. Krump

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  438,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  13,000

  	
   

  	
  3

  	
  %

  	
  $

  	
  451,000

  	
   

  







*       Salary increases take effect April 1,
2007.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Acting Assistant Secretary Littlejohn’s Travel to Seattle for APEC SOM3

# 									Acting Assistant Secretary Littlejohn’s Travel to Seattle for APEC SOM3							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

August 4, 2023

Acting Assistant Secretary for Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs Jennifer R. Littlejohn will travel to Seattle August 5-8, 2023, for the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation Third Senior Officials’ Meeting (APEC SOM3).

She will attend the APEC Policy Partnership in Science, Technology, and Innovation (PPSTI) and present the APEC Science Prize for Innovation, Research and Education (ASPIRE), which recognizes young scientists who have demonstrated a commitment to both excellence in scientific research and cooperation with scientists from other APEC member economies.  She will also attend the Women in STEM Principles and Actions meeting to exchange best practices for inclusivity in STEM with colleagues from across the APEC region.

While in Seattle, Acting Assistant Secretary Littlejohn will meet local government officials, business leaders, and innovators to discuss how policy and science and technology innovation are crucial to growing a sustainable economy and to solving global challenges such as wildlife trafficking, illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing, and plastic pollution.

APEC is the premier platform for the United States to advance economic policies in the Asia-Pacific region to promote free, fair, and open trade and investment and advance inclusive, resilient, and sustainable growth.

For media inquiries, please contact OES-PA-DG@state.gov.

Tags

Asia-Pacific Economic CooperationBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial Domestic TravelScienceScientific and Technological CooperationWashington

Back to Top
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 330.11 Supplements, amendments, or revisions.

The Secretary of the Treasury may, at any time, or from time to time, revise, supplement, amend or withdraw, in whole or in part, the provisions of this part.
IV

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 51

Expressing the sense of the Congress relating to the removal of Russian

troops from Kaliningrad.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 28, 1995

Mr. COX of California submitted the following concurrent resolution; which

was referred to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress relating to the removal

of Russian troops from Kaliningrad.

Whereas the historic Konigsberg area in the Baltic, now

known as Kaliningrad, belonged to Germany prior to

World War II;

Whereas after Germany’s defeat in World War II the victorious countries agreed at the Potsdam Conference that the

Konigsberg area would be administered by the Soviet

Union pending the signing of a formal peace treaty, at

which time sovereignty over the Konigsberg area would

be decided;

Whereas because of the advent of the cold war, a peace treaty

with Germany was not signed until 1990, at which time

Germany relinquished its claims to the Konigsberg area
2

•HCON 51 IH

but German sovereignty was not transferred to any other

country;

Whereas from 1945 until its demise, the Soviet Union destroyed the historical sites of Konigsberg, renamed the

area Kaliningrad, removed its population by extermination and deportation, caused substantial environmental

damage, and caused the area to become a military outpost consisting of 200,000 military personnel in an area

of 15,100 square kilometers;

Whereas the Russian Federation has succeeded to the obligations of the Soviet Union in this area; and

Whereas the existence of the Kaliningrad military outpost

poses a threat to the peace and security of the Baltic region and Europe, particularly to Lithuania which finds

itself perilously located between Kaliningrad and Belarus,

two of the most militarized regions of the world: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) the Kaliningrad/Konigsberg area should be

4 made into a demilitarized zone, and the Russian

5 Federation should remove all its military forces from

6 such area;

7 (2) the administration of the Kaliningrad/

8 Konigsberg area should be transferred from the

9 Russian Federation to an international body; and

10 (3) appropriate international and regional agen11 cies should be requested to conduct and implement
3

•HCON 51 IH

1 studies to restore the environmental integrity of the

2 area.

Æ
#### In the Matter of Leede A. De Lagarde II, Appellant, v New York State Division of Parole, Respondent.

[803 NYS2d 820]

Rose, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Ceresia, Jr., J.), entered February 8, 2005 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Petitioner was convicted in 1987 of murder in the second degree after he fatally shot a man following a dispute over a debt. He was sentenced to 15 years to life in prison. In January 2004, he made his fourth appearance before the Board of Parole for parole release. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Board denied his request and ordered him held for an additional 24 months. After the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding. Following joinder of issue, Supreme Court dismissed the petition, and petitioner now appeals.

Parole release decisions are discretionary and will not be disturbed provided that they comply with the requirements of Executive Law § 259-i (see *Matter of Mendez v New York State Bd. of Parole,*20 AD3d 742, 743 [2005]; *Matter of Zayd WW. v Travis,*17 AD3d 755, 755 [2005], *lv denied*5 NY3d 706 [2005]). We reiterate that the Board is not required to specifically set forth each statutory factor it considered in making its decision nor must it accord each factor equal weight *(see Matter of Wan Zhang v Travis,*10 AD3d 828, 829 [2004]; *Matter of De La Cruz v Travis,*10 AD3d 789, 790 [2004]). Here, the transcript of the parole hearing reveals that, in addition to the circumstances of the crime, the Board took into account petitioner’s encouraging program participation, his good disciplinary record, postrelease employment prospects as an optician and proposed living arrangements with family. Upon review, however, we cannot say that its decision denying petitioner release on parole evinced *877“ ‘irrationality bordering on impropriety’ ” *(Matter of Silmon v Travis,*95 NY2d 470, 476 [2000], quoting *Matter of Russo v New York State Bd. of Parole,*50 NY2d 69, 77 [1980]). Nor can we conclude that this decision is the result of an executive policy of denying parole to violent felons *(see Matter of Cartagena v New York State Bd. of Parole,*20 AD3d 751, 752 [2005]; *Matter of Davis v New York State Bd. of Parole,*17 AD3d 970 [2005]). Therefore, we decline to disturb Supreme Court’s dismissal of the petition.

Crew III, J.P., Peters, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
#### § 0.218 General conduct prejudicial to the government.

An employee shall not engage in criminal, infamous, dishonest, immoral, or notoriously disgraceful conduct, or other conduct prejudicial to the government.
II

Calendar No. 290

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1253

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

DECEMBER 13, 1995

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

DECEMBER 19, 1995

Reported by Mr. CHAFEE, without amendment

AN ACT

To rename the San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge

as the Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SAN FRANCISCO BAY NATIONAL WILDLIFE REF4 UGE RENAMED AS DON EDWARDS SAN FRAN5 CISCO BAY NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE.

6 (a) REFUGE RENAMED.—The San Francisco Bay

7 National Wildlife Refuge (established by the Act entitled

8 ‘‘An Act to provide for the establishment of the San Fran-
2

HR 1253 RS

1 cisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge’’, approved June 30,

2 1972 (86 Stat. 399 et seq.)), is hereby renamed and shall

3 be known as ‘‘the Don Edwards San Francisco Bay Na4 tional Wildlife Refuge’’.

5 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any statute,

6 rule, regulation, Executive order, publication, map, or

7 paper or other document of the United States to the San

8 Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge is deemed to refer

9 to the Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife

10 Refuge.

11 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The Act entitled

12 ‘‘An Act to provide for the establishment of the San Fran13 cisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge’’, approved June 30,

14 1972 (86 Stat. 399 et seq.), is amended by striking ‘‘San

15 Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge’’ each place it ap16 pears and inserting ‘‘Don Edwards San Francisco Bay

17 National Wildlife Refuge’’.

Passed the House of Representatives December 12,

1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.

Calendar No. 290

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1253

AN ACT

To rename the San Francisco Bay National WildBay National Wildlife Refuge. life Refuge as the Don Edwards San Francisco

DECEMBER 19, 1995

Reported without amendment