alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
g ALEUTIAN ISLANDS

UNITED STATES BATHYMETRIC MAP UNALASKA

= we 4

ae ae ee Ptuved at Werteagen, DC
US, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

HANORAL DEEANL AND AMAOGMIEC ARMIETEATION
i MATIOMAL OCEAN SERVICE

acten part,

DATING MLA (OWNER (Clee WATTS

aseleteal MERCATOR MRECMCTON
Seay ba90900
www.gpo.gov

### §1704. Advisory boards and committees

The Secretary is authorized to make use of advisory committees in connection with the operation of the Job Corps, and the operation of Job Corps centers, whenever the Secretary determines that the availability of outside advice and counsel on a regular basis would be of substantial benefit in identifying and overcoming problems, in planning program or center development, or in strengthening relationships between the Job Corps and agencies, institutions, or groups engaged in related activities.

(Pub. L. 97–300, title IV, §434, Oct. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1378.)
§ 513.6 Pensions and life annuities. ( a ) Pensions, other than pensions paid by the Government of the United States to individuals in respect of services rendered thereto in the discharge of governmental functions, and any life annuity, derived from sources within the United States in taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 1951, by a nonresident alien individual who is resident in Ireland for the purposes of Irish tax are exempt from United States tax under the provisions of Article XII of the convention.
( b ) To obviate withholding at the source in the case of such exempt income the nonresident alien individual who is resident in Ireland for the purposes of Irish tax shall notify the withholding agent by letter in duplicate that such income is exempt from United States tax under the provisions of Article XII of the convention. The letter of notification shall be signed by the owner of the income, shall show the name and address of both the payer and the owner, and shall contain a statement that the owner, an individual, is neither a citizen nor a resident of the United States but is resident in Ireland for the purposes of Irish tax. This letter shall constitute authorization for the payment of such income without deduction of the tax at source unless the Commissioner of Internal Revenue subsequently notifies the withholding agent that the tax should be withheld from payments of such income made after receipt of such notice. If, after filing a letter of notification, the owner of the income ceases to be eligible for the benefit of the convention, he must promptly notify the withholding agent by letter in duplicate.
( c ) Each letter of notification, or the duplicate thereof, must be immediately forwarded by the withholding agent to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Clearing Branch, Washington 25, D.C.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 159 (Wednesday, August 19, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 41967]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19915]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6732]


Waiver of Restriction on Assistance to the Central Government of 
Maldives

    Pursuant to section 7088(c)(2) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2009 (Division H, 
Pub. L. 111-8) (``the Act''), and Department of State Delegation of 
Authority Number 245-1, I hereby determine that it is important to the 
national interest of the United States to waive the requirements of 
section 7088(c)(1) of the Act with respect to the Government of the 
Republic of Maldives, and I hereby waive such restriction.
    This determination shall be reported to the Congress, and published 
in the Federal Register.

    Dated: July 29, 2009.
Jacob J. Lew,
Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. E9-19915 Filed 8-18-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-26-P
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Krupp Government Income Trust (the
"Trust") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alan
Reese, Chief Accounting Officer of the Trust, certify, pursuant to U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Trust as of September 30, 2003 (the last
                  date of the period covered by the Report).


/s/ Alan Reese
-------------------
Alan Reese
Chief Accounting Officer

Date: October 30, 2003


                                      -18-
#### § 15.737-9 Receipt of information concerning former Treasury employee.

If an officer or employee of the Department has reason to believe that a former officer or employee of the Department has violated 18 U.S.C. 207 (a), (b) or (c), or if any such officer or employee receives information to that effect, he/she shall promptly make a written report thereof, which report or a copy thereof shall be forwarded to the Inspector General, Department of the Treasury. If any other person has information of such violations, he/she may make a report thereof to the Inspector General or to any officer or employee of the Department. The Inspector General shall refer any information he/she deems warranted to the Director.
EPA EDIR# 4250(a) 

Received: August 5, 2011
EPA EDIR# 4250(a) 

Received: August 5, 2011
EPA EDIR# 4250(a) 

Received: August 5, 2011
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1298 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1298

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to exempt fluid milk 
   standards of the State of California from preemption in order to 
    guarantee the same high quality fluid milk to the consumers of 
             California that they have received since 1961.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 22, 1995

  Mr. Thomas (for himself and Mr. Moorhead) introduced the following 
         bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to exempt fluid milk 
   standards of the State of California from preemption in order to 
    guarantee the same high quality fluid milk to the consumers of 
             California that they have received since 1961.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CALIFORNIA FLUID MILK STANDARDS.

    Section 403A(a)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 
U.S.C. 343-1(a)) is amended by striking ``does not apply to a standard 
of identity of a State or political subdivision of a State for maple 
syrup that is of the type required by sections 401 and 403(g)'' and 
inserting the following: ``does not apply to--
            ``(A) a standard of identity of a State or political 
        subdivision of a State for maple syrup that is of the type 
        required by sections 401 and 403(g), or
            ``(B) a standard of identity for fluid milk of the State of 
        California that--
                    ``(i) was in existence on November 7, 1990,
                    ``(ii) is of the type required by sections 401 and 
                403(g),
                    ``(iii) was included within a State petition filed 
                under subsection (b) before October 1, 1993, and
                    ``(iv) specifies a higher minimum level of milk 
                components than is provided for in the corresponding 
                standard of identity promulgated under section 401.
For purposes of subparagraph (B), the term `fluid milk' means liquid 
milk in final packaged form for beverage use and does not include dry 
milk, manufactured milk products, or tanker bulk milk.''.
                                 <all>
```
HomeBiographies...Douglas D. Jones

# 				Douglas D. Jones			

															Deputy Assistant Secretary						Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs												

				September 27, 2021 -									Present							

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsState Department Official

Back to Top
UNITED STATES BATHYMETRIC MAP COLD BAY

[he Sepoeequales ora Lpwowt bebvenenhihodeapeadscertotend

ATES STI
Pn Revyeery tees toe MER Syoagrine pave aes fo sae nh coy _
3 =
ee edt estes ade werneme Toe Sm at stp Se ao Weikogien, OC
— fa US. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ou
Front ammeter Crt fee 4 ew Sy ft eee mike i sonmui nen eens
mn ite pom mak somo 8 te it An ee ay
Sear canoe tre 0 Stes Oop Gomes tes One menage, #
Serer eatecpenn rs a2 a
to Oh eee rodents bes me Absoren Managemen Rewrew == RATUTIN COTO PATERVALL: (0 ATRL 1G Wrenn UHFTH.
ie Sumriemanentn rr wbren mertiach Ta my fe
iin i Danan mata LCAWE LW WATER ow,
a ES - -
£3 Taser retSe MERCATOR FOCI TEN re \ei
——} # _, Sele 178.008 “esses i i
_ 4 # ee ~ Bie, eS
= 3 Ease : Sa t Aa ws

Sa
NOTICE: NOT FOR PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE

LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE

BRADLEY J. FOLKESTAD, M.D. and LISA FOLKESTAD, husband and 

wife; BRADLEY J. FOLKESTAD, M.D., L.T.D., an Arizona professional 

corporation, Petitioners,

v.

THE HONORABLE MICHAEL J. HERROD, Judge of the SUPERIOR 

COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA, in and for the County of

MARICOPA, Respondent Judge,

MARVIN L. ERICKSON, M.D., an individual; DAMIAN J. BASS, M.D., an 

individual; DANIEL H. HU, M.D., an individual, Real Parties in Interest.

No. 1 CA-SA 14-0105

Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CV2008-026970

The Honorable Michael J. Herrod, Judge

JURISDICTION ACCEPTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Gillespie Shields & Durrant, Phoenix

By Dan M. Durrant

Counsel for Petitioner
2

Beus Gilbert PLLC, Phoenix

By Leo R. Beus, Thomas A. Connelly, Sarah S. Letzkus

Counsel for Real Parties in Interest

DECISION ORDER

Presiding Judge Patricia K. Norris delivered the decision of the Court, in 

which Judge Samuel A. Thumma and Judge Kent E. Cattani joined.

N O R R I S, Judge:

¶1 This special action arises out of an order entered by the 

superior court setting this matter for trial to the court with an advisory 

jury. The court, Presiding Judge Patricia K. Norris, and Judges Samuel A. 

Thumma and Kent E. Cattani, participating, has considered the parties 

written submissions. Because an order denying or granting a jury trial is 

not separately appealable, see Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101 (Supp. 2013), a 

petition for special action is an appropriate method of seeking review. 

Hoyle v. Superior Court, 161 Ariz. 224, 226, 778 P.2d 259, 261 (App. 1989).

Accordingly, we accept jurisdiction but deny relief. 

¶2 Even if the court assumes the parties agreed to waive their 

right to request a jury trial, Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure 39(m) 

authorizes a superior court in an action not triable of right by a jury to, on 

its own initiative, try any issue with an advisory jury. Thus, the superior 

court did not abuse its discretion in setting this matter for trial with an 

advisory jury. Cf. Ringling Bros. & Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc. v. 

Superior Court, 140 Ariz. 38, 42, 680 P.2d 174, 178 (App. 1984) (superior 

court has discretion to submit jurisdictional issue to advisory jury).
#### § 15.737-29 Review by the General Counsel.

In my proceeding before the Department, if an initial decision is made with respect to the disqualification of a representative or attorney for a party on the grounds of 18 U.S.C. 207(a), (b) or (c), such decision may be appealed to the General Counsel, who will make the agency decision on the issue.
HomeBiographies...Roger D. Carstens

# 				Roger D. Carstens			

															Special Presidential Envoy for Hostage Affairs												

				March 2, 2020 -									Present							

Tags

Office of the Special Presidential Envoy for Hostage AffairsState Department Official

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Birch Branch, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert Lazzeri, Chief
Financial Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date:    May 15, 2009
                                            /s/ Robert Lazzeri
                                            ------------------
                                            Robert Lazzeri
                                            Chief Financial Officer and Director
**
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Vistra Energy Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K (as amended) forthe period ended December 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Curtis A. Morgan, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the datehereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge: 

 
(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

 
(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. 

 
Date: July 19, 2019   
/s/ Curtis A. Morgan
   Curtis A. Morgan   President and Chief Executive Officer   (Principal Executive Officer)
*The foregoing certification is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Vistra Energy Corp. under Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general incorporation language of such filing.*

 
**
#### § 34.307 Recordkeeping—Direct Component.

Recipients must maintain records as prescribed by Treasury, and make the records available to Treasury, including the Treasury Inspector General.
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report
of TEPPCO Partners, L.P. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2008 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, Jerry E. Thompson, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Texas Eastern Products Pipeline Company, LLC, the general
partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and





2. The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.











/s/  JERRY E.
THOMPSON


Jerry E.
Thompson


President
and Chief Executive Officer


Texas
Eastern Products Pipeline Company, LLC, General Partner





November
7, 2008








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
TEPPCO Partners, L.P. and will be retained by TEPPCO Partners, L.P. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
§ 515.330 Person within the United States. ( a ) The term *person within the United States,* includes: ( 1 ) Any person, wheresoever located, who is a resident of the United States;
( 2 ) Any person actually within the United States;
( 3 ) Any corporation, partnership, association, or other organization organized under the laws of the United States or of any State, territory, possession, or district of the United States; and
( 4 ) Any corporation, partnership, association, or other organization, wherever organized or doing business, which is owned or controlled by any person or persons specified in paragraphs (a)(1) or (a)(3) of this section.
( b ) [Reserved]
[28 FR 6974, July 9, 1963, as amended at 68 FR 14145, Mar. 24, 2003]
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 341.0 Offering of bonds. The Secretary of the Treasury, under the authority of the Second Liberty Bond Act, as amended, and pursuant to the Self-Employed Individuals Tax Retirement Act of 1962, offers for sale, effective as of January 1, 1963, bonds of the United States, designated as United States Retirement Plan Bonds. The bonds will be available for investment only to: ( a ) Bond purchase plans and
( b ) Pension and profit-sharing plans, as described in sections 405 and 401, respectively, of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.
This offering of bonds will terminate on April 30, 1982. [28 FR 405, Jan. 16, 1963, as amended at 47 FR 18596, Apr. 30, 1982]
40299.

#### HOLLIS v. ST. JOSEPH INFIRMARY, INC.

Decided September 12, 1963.

*George F. Wheeler, Jr., William M. Redman, Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*Lohey & Bowden, Charles M. Lohey,*contra.

Eberhardt, Judge.

The defendant’s motion for summary judgment was granted in this malpractice case. The only affidavit produced by the plaintiff was her own, which largely dealt with admitted facts and was impeaching of Dr. Bregman, one of the defendant’s affiants. Assuming that the issue of this witness’s credibility was properly raised, invoking the trial judge’s discretion, see *Darby v. Interstate Life &c. Ins. Co.,*107 Ga. App. 409, 410 (2) (130 SE2d 360), the plaintiff still failed to carry the burden of producing proof by other physicians of the want of care, skill or diligence on the part of defendant’s staff physician. *Shea v. Phillips,*213 Ga. 269 (2) (98 SE2d 552). In this situation, we have no choice but to rule that the summary judgment was properly granted. See *Hayes v. Brown,*108 Ga. App., post.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Felton, C. J., and Russell, J., concur.*
GULP OF ALASKA

UNITED STATES BATHYMETRIC MAP KODIAK

sro bes gy + =

NS lS WE Se ET, get Be | be Fh Tl ee
= Foe ° 2 RAR LAS

KODIAK ISLAND

Pubbihed ot Weiboepen, DIC
US DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

MATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERE ADWHSTEATION
NATIONAL OCLAM SERVICE
1985

KODIAK
NOS NO 5-6

METRE: CONTOUR PMTERVALS, 10 ACTER 1 200 METER DEPT
\EOMIPsTED AY $ SeETER PVTERVALS THENCE St METERS TC MANMLING
CPIM, SAPP CAASCTTED A LO maT SseTFAWAGS

CATUM, MEAN LOWER Lom ATER
40308.

#### NATIONAL HOMES, INC. v. CITY PLUMBING & HEATING SUPPLY COMPANY.

Decided October 9, 1963

Rehearing denied October 18, 1963.

*520*Brannon, Brannon & Schuder, Robert E. Knox,*for plaintiff in error.

*Howard Oliver, Jr.,*contra.

Hall, Judge.

We recognize the authorities holding that the authority of an agent “ . . . may be established by the principal’s conduct and course of dealing, and if one holds out another as his agent, and by his course of dealing indicates that the agent has certain authority, and thus induces another to deal with his agent as such, he is estopped to deny that the agent has any authority which, as reasonably deducible from the conduct of the parties, the agent apparently has.” *Equitable Credit Corp. v. Johnson,*86 Ga. App. 844, 847 (72 SE2d 816); *Sinclair Refining Co. v. First Nat. Bank,*45 Ga. App. 769 (165 SE 860). An estoppel will arise when a principal places an agent in a position of apparent authority, so that a person of ordinary prudence conversant with business usages and the nature of the particular business is justified in assuming that such agent has authority to perform a particular act and deals with the agent upon that assumption. *Commercial Credit Corp. v. Noles,*85 Ga. App. 392, 396 (69 SE2d 309). For a definition of “apparent authority,” see *U. S. Fidelity*&c. *Co. v. Hilliard,*107 Ga. App. 266, 269 (129 SE2d 559). To create an estoppel by conduct of the principal it must be shown that the complaining party dealt with the sup*521posed agent in reliance upon the authority which the- principal apparently conferred upon him, and changed his position as a result of such reliance. 2 CJS 1217 et seq., § 96; 3 Am. Jur. 2d 477, § 75 et seq.; accord *Piedmont Operating Co. v.*Cummings, 40 Ga. App. 397 (149 SE 814).

The evidence in this case failed to show that the plaintiff changed his position in reliance on any conduct of the principal apparently conferring authority on an agent.

The case of *Greensboro Bonded Warehouse v. Klein Mfg. Co.,*35 Ga. App. 515 (134 SE 140), relied on by the plaintiff, is not applicable because it was not proved in the present case that Edge was the agent of the Knox Corporation.

The trial court erred, therefore, in overruling the defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The remaining assignments of error become moot.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Bell, P. J., and Panned, J., concur.*
www.gpo.gov

### §2015. Uniform education procedures and practices

The Secretary shall cause the various divisions of the Bureau to formulate uniform procedures and practices with respect to such concerns of those divisions as relate to education, and shall report such practices and procedures to the Congress.

(Pub. L. 95–561, title XI, §1135, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title III, §381, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 4010.)

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2015, Pub. L. 95–561, title XI, §1135, Nov. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 2327, related to recruitment policy for Indian educators and promotion plan for Bureau employees, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 103–382.

#### Section Referred to in Other Sections

This section is referred to in section 2019 of this title.