alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

###### Editorial Note on Part 360

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 360 appear at 79 FR 8860, Feb. 14, 2014.

#### § 360.42 Nonreceipt or loss of remittance issued in payment.

If a remittance in payment of the redemption value of a bond surrendered for redemption is not received within a reasonable time or is lost after receipt, notice should be given to the same agency to which the bond was surrendered for payment. The notice should give the date the bond was surrendered for payment and describe the bond by series, denomination, serial number, and registration, including the taxpayer identifying number of the owner.
§ 16.41 Stay pending appeal. ( a ) An initial decision is stayed automatically pending disposition of a motion for reconsideration or of an appeal to the authority head.
( b ) No administrative stay is available following a final decision of the authority head.
**Exhibit 10.1**

 

**AttachmentC**

**Amendmentsto TEPPCO Employee Benefit Plans**

 

1.

 

2.

 

3.

 

4.                                       TEPPCO Retirement Cash Balance Plan

 

(a)                                  Effective May 31, 2005 participation is “frozen,” i.e.,no employee who is not a participant on May 31, 2005 shall be eligible tobecome covered by (become a participant in) the plan after that date.

 

(b)                                 Effective December 31, 2005 (i) all benefitsaccrued as of that date shall be “frozen,” i.e., no employer contributioncredits shall be credited for any period after that date, and (ii) allparticipants shall be 100% vested regardless of their years of service.

 

(c)                                  The Plan is terminated effective as of January 1, 2006.

 

5.                                       TEPPCO Supplemental Benefit Plan

 

(a)                                  A Participant’s employment with EPCO, Inc. or anaffiliate of EPCO, Inc. shall be deemed to be employment with TEPPCO.

 

(b)                                 The Plan shall be terminated on or before December 31,2005.

 

(c)                                  Upon termination of the Plan, all benefits shall be paid ina lump sum in 2005.

 

6.

 

7.

 

8.

 

9.

 

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6445
JAMIE LAMONT MILES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WELLS, Doctor/Dentist; MAYHUE, Doctor/Dentist, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-05-98-2) Submitted: May 19, 2005 Decided: May 26, 2005 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jamie Lamont Miles, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Jamie Lamont Miles appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. “No action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions under section 1983 . . . by a prisoner confined in any jail, p rison, or other correctional facility until such administrative remedies as are available are exhausted.” 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) (2000). We find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s dismissal of the complaint without prejudice to allow Miles an opportunity to exhaust his administrative remedies, as required by § 1997e(a). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 31.1
 
 CONTROL CERTIFICATION
 
 I, James A. Coyne, certify that:
 
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of PLM Equipment Growth Fund V.
 
 2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report.
 
 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.
 
 4.  The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and
 
 b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation.
 
 5.  The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.
 
 6.  The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
 
 
 
 Date: August 12, 2004  By:  /s/ James A. Coyne
 James A. Coyne
 President
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 204 (Wednesday, October 22, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 63207]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25171]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 8925]

In the Matter of the Designation of Sangeen Zadran as a Specially 
Designated Global Terrorist Pursuant to Section 1(b) of Executive Order 
13224, as Amended

    In accordance with section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224 of 
September 23, 2001, as amended (``the Order''), I hereby determine that 
the individual known as Sangeen Zadran, also known as other aliases and 
transliterations, no longer meets the criteria for designation under 
the Order, and therefore I hereby revoke the designation of the 
aforementioned individual as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist 
pursuant to section 1(b) of the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: October 10, 2014.
John F. Kerry,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-25171 Filed 10-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
- TE Home
- About
- Remarks
- Technology Solutions
- Programs
- Defeat Disinfo
- Resources
- Events
- Contact Us

HomeTechnology Engagement Division...About Us – Technology Engagement Division

# 									About Us							

## 								TE Director's Box							

        -  *The TE looks forward to engaging with interagency and foreign government partners as well as academia and private industry representatives. We are all in this effort together and can achieve the best results when we combine and learn from each other’s creativity, determination, and capabilities*.” — **Patricia Watts, Director of the Technology Engagement Team**    

### The Threats: Foreign Propaganda and Disinformation

        - Adversaries who produce propaganda disseminate misleading, deceptive, or inaccurate information with the intent to sway consumers’ beliefs, opinions, and perceptions.
        - Actors who disseminate information they  know to be inaccurate  are engaging in disinformation campaigns, whereas actors who spread false information, but  do not demonstrate a clear intention to mislead , are spreading misinformation.

### Defending Against the Threats

        - Identify, assess, and categorize novel technologies in this field.
        - Match technologies to the most timely and acute needs of the U.S. government.
        - Maintain a technology portal for testing and assessing these tools and technologies.
        - Broker constructive engagements between the U.S. government and the tech sector to identify, expose, and defend against foreign propaganda and disinformation.

### Locations

## Related Articles

-  											 													About Us			
Read more
 

Back to Top
§ 16.28 Motions. ( a ) Any application to the ALJ for an order or ruling shall be by motion. Motions shall state the relief sought, the authority relied upon, and the facts alleged, and shall be filed with the ALJ and served on all other parties.
( b ) Except for motions made during a prehearing conference or at the hearing, all motions shall be in writing. The ALJ may require that oral motions be reduced to writing.
( c ) Within 15 days after a written motion is served, or such other time as may be fixed by the ALJ, any party may file a response to such motion.
( d ) The ALJ may not grant a written motion before the time for filing responses thereto has expired, except upon consent of the parties or following a hearing on the motion, but may overrule or deny such motion without awaiting a response.
( e ) The ALJ shall make a reasonable effort to dispose of all outstanding motions prior to the beginning of the hearing.
§ 29.512 Reconsideration by the Benefits Administrator. ( a ) *Right to reconsideration of overpayment determinations.* Individuals who receive a demand letter and who wish to contest the existence or amount of the overpayment may ask the Benefits Administrator to reconsider the determination.
( b ) *Requests for waiver or compromise.* Individuals who wish to seek waiver or compromise of the overpayment may file such requests with the Department under § 29.514. An individual may file a request for reconsideration in addition to a request for waiver or compromise.
( c ) *Form and timing of requests for reconsideration.* ( 1 ) A request for reconsideration must be in writing and must state the basis for the request. Individuals requesting reconsideration will be given a full opportunity to present any pertinent information and documentation supporting their position and should, to the extent possible, include such information and documentation in their request.
( 2 ) A request for reconsideration must be received by the Benefits Administrator within 60 calendar days of the date of the demand letter. The Department may extend the time limit for filing when the individual shows that he or she was not notified of the time limit and was not otherwise aware of it, or that he or she was prevented by circumstances beyond his or her control from making the request within the time limit, or for other good and sufficient reason.
( 3 ) When a request for reconsideration covered by this subpart is properly filed before the death of the debtor, it will be processed to completion unless the relief sought is nullified by the debtor's death.
( d ) *Reconsideration decisions.* ( 1 ) The Benefits Administrator's decision on a request for reconsideration will be based upon the individual's written submissions, evidence of record, and other pertinent available information.
( 2 ) A reconsideration decision by the Benefits Administrator must— ( i ) Be in writing;
( ii ) Provide notice of the extent of the individual's liability for the overpayment, if any;
( iii ) If the individual is determined to be liable for all or a portion of the overpayment, reaffirm or modify the conditions for the collection of the overpayment previously proposed in the demand letter;
( iv ) Provide notice of the right to appeal the Benefits Administrator's decision to the Department, the address to which such an appeal must be submitted, and the time limits applicable to such an appeal; and
( v ) State that a timely appeal of the Benefits Administrator's decision to the Department will suspend action to collect the debt.
( e ) *Appeal of reconsideration decisions.* The Department will review an appeal of a reconsideration decision under § 29.513.
#### § 30.8 Q-8: What actions are necessary for a TARP recipient to comply with the standards established under section 111(b)(3)(B) of EESA (the “clawback” provision requirement)?

To comply with the standards established under section 111(b)(3)(B) of EESA, a TARP recipient must ensure that any bonus payment made to a SEO or the next twenty most highly compensated employees during the TARP period is subject to a provision for recovery or “clawback” by the TARP recipient if the bonus payment was based on materially inaccurate financial statements (which includes, but is not limited to, statements of earnings, revenues, or gains) or any other materially inaccurate performance metric criteria. Whether a financial statement or performance metric criteria is materially inaccurate depends on all the facts and circumstances. However, for this purpose, a financial statement or performance metric criteria shall be treated as materially inaccurate with respect to any employee who knowingly engaged in providing inaccurate information (including knowingly failing to timely correct inaccurate information) relating to those financial statements or performance metrics. Otherwise, with respect to a performance criteria, whether the inaccurate measurement of the performance or inaccurate application of the performance to the performance criteria is material depends on whether the actual performance or accurate application of the actual performance to the performance criteria is materially different from the performance required under the performance criteria or the inaccurate application of the actual performance to the performance criteria. The TARP recipient must exercise its clawback rights except to the extent it demonstrates that it is unreasonable to do so, such as, for example, if the expense of enforcing the rights would exceed the amount recovered. For the purpose of this section, a bonus payment is deemed to be made to an individual when the individual obtains a legally binding right to that payment.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Assistant Secretary Witkowsky’s Travel to Germany

# 									Assistant Secretary Witkowsky’s Travel to Germany							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

April 1, 2022

Assistant Secretary of State for Conflict and Stabilization Operations Anne Witkowsky will travel to Berlin, Germany, from April 3-7, 2022.

In Berlin, Assistant Secretary Witkowsky will lead a delegation to the Stabilization Leaders Forum along with representatives from Australia, Canada, Denmark, the European Union, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. The meeting, organized by the German Ministry of Foreign Affairs, will explore perspectives and priorities for stabilization and conflict prevention efforts. Examining lessons from past conflict environments, the Assistant Secretary’s visit will highlight how academics, civil society leaders, and policy experts can contribute to stabilization operations in the future. Her interactions will build upon years of U.S. engagement in a variety of settings with the goal of preventing conflict and promoting stability.

Tags

Bureau of Conflict and Stabilization OperationsBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsGermanyOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial International Travel

Back to Top
#### Donald B. HARGET, Jr., as surviving spouse and next of kin of Vickey Lynn Harget, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROBERT F. SHARPE & CO., INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 01-5863.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

June 20, 2002.

Before BOGGS, SILER, and MOORE, Circuit Judges.

*788Donald Harget, a Tennessee litigant, appeals a district court summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Robert F. Sharpe *&*Co., Inc., in this survivor action brought under the civil enforcement section of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132. The parties have expressly waived oral argument, and this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed in this case. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

The record indicates that Vicky Harget joined Sharpe & Co. on April 7, 1997, but that she signed her insurance enrollment form enrolling in the company’s life insurance policy on December 16, 1997, more than thirty-one days after she began work for the company. After her employment with Sharpe & Co. began, Vicky Harget developed a medical condition that ultimately led to her death on January 21, 1999. As a result of Vicky Harget’s delay in enrolling in the company’s life insurance program, Principal Life Insurance Company denied Mrs. Harget’s husband’s claim for life insurance benefits. Donald Harget, as the surviving spouse of his late wife, sought $42,422.96 in life insurance benefits that were allegedly withheld from him due to the defendant’s negligence. The district court granted summary judgment to the defendant after concluding that Harget failed to come forward with any evidence of material fact sufficient to preclude summary judgment. This timely appeal followed.

Upon de novo review, *see Brooks v. Am. Broad. Cos.,*932 F.2d 495, 500 (6th Cir. 1991), we affirm the judgment for the reasons stated by the district court in its order filed May 30, 2001. Even if the affidavit testimony offered by the defendant is excluded, Donald Harget provided no proof that Sharpe *&*Co. ever breached any duty it owed to Vicky Harget. Without evidence permitting an inference that Sharpe *&*Co. breached some duty to Vicky Harget, there is no genuine issue of material fact with regard to Sharpe & Co.’s liability in this matter. *See*Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e). The nonmoving party may not rest on the mere allegations in the pleadings. *See*Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e); *Celotex Corp. v. Catrett,*477 U.S. 317, 324, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986). Accordingly, summary judgment for the defendant was proper.

Accordingly, the district court’s judgment should be affirmed.'
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 354.5 Obligations of Sallie Mae; no adverse claims. ( a ) Except in the case of a security interest in favor of the United States or a Federal Reserve Bank or otherwise as provided in § 354.4(c)(1), for the purposes of this part 354, Sallie Mae and the Federal Reserve Banks shall treat the Participant to whose Securities Account an interest in a Book-entry Sallie Mae Security has been credited as the person exclusively entitled to issue a Transfer Message, to receive interest and other payments with respect thereof and otherwise to exercise all the rights and powers with respect to such Security, notwithstanding any information or notice to the contrary. Neither the Federal Reserve Banks nor Sallie Mae is liable to a Person asserting or having an Adverse Claim to a Security Entitlement or to a Book-entry Sallie Mae Security in a Participant's Securities Account, including any such claim arising as a result of the transfer or disposition of a Book-entry Sallie Mae Security by a Federal Reserve Bank pursuant to a Transfer Message that the Federal Reserve Bank reasonably believes to be genuine.
( b ) The obligation of Sallie Mae to make payments of interest and principal with respect to Book-entry Sallie Mae Securities is discharged at the time payment in the appropriate amount is made as follows: ( 1 ) Interest on Book-entry Sallie Mae Securities is either credited by a Federal Reserve Bank to a Funds Account maintained at such Bank or otherwise paid as directed by the Participant.
( 2 ) Book-entry Sallie Mae Securities are redeemed at maturity or pursuant to a call for redemption in accordance with their terms by a Federal Reserve Bank withdrawing the securities from the Participant's Securities Account in which they are maintained and by either crediting the amount of the redemption proceeds, including both principal and interest where applicable, to a Funds Account at such Bank or otherwise paying such principal and interest, as directed by the Participant.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1261 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1261

  To provide for duty free treatment for entries and- withdrawals of 
 tamoxifen citrate after December 31, 1993, and before January 1, 1995.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 1995

  Mr. Moakley (for himself, Mr. Rangel, Mrs. Kennelly, Mrs. Meyers of 
   Kansas, Ms. Pryce, and Mr. Neal of Massachusetts) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for duty free treatment for entries and- withdrawals of 
 tamoxifen citrate after December 31, 1993, and before January 1, 1995.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DUTY FREE TREATMENT OF CERTAIN ENTRIES AND WITHDRAWALS.

    Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 
1514) or any other provision of law, upon a request filed with the 
Customs Service before the 90th day after the date of the enactment of 
this Act, any entry or withdrawal from warehouse for consumption of 
tamoxifen citrate (provided for in subheading 2922.19.10 of the 
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, as in effect on 
December 1, 1994)--
            (1) which was made after December 31, 1993, and before 
        January 1, 1995, and
            (2) with respect to which there would have been no duty if 
        such entry or withdrawal had been made on or after January 1, 
        1995,
shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such entry or withdrawal 
had been made on or after January 1, 1995.
                                 <all>
```