alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. R. 1225

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the fourth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-five

An Act

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to exempt employees who perform

certain court reporting duties from the compensatory time requirements applicable

to certain public agencies, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Court Reporter Fair Labor

Amendments of 1995’’.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON OVERTIME COMPENSATION FOR COURT

REPORTERS.

Section 7(o) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C.

207(o)) is amended—

(1) by redesignating paragraph (6) as paragraph (7); and

(2) by inserting after paragraph (5) the following new paragraph:

‘‘(6) The hours an employee of a public agency performs court

reporting transcript preparation duties shall not be considered as

hours worked for the purposes of subsection (a) if—

‘‘(A) such employee is paid at a per-page rate which is

not less than—

‘‘(i) the maximum rate established by State law or

local ordinance for the jurisdiction of such public agency,

‘‘(ii) the maximum rate otherwise established by a

judicial or administrative officer and in effect on July 1,

1995, or

‘‘(iii) the rate freely negotiated between the employee

and the party requesting the transcript, other than the

judge who presided over the proceedings being transcribed,

and

‘‘(B) the hours spent performing such duties are outside

of the hours such employee performs other work (including

hours for which the agency requires the employee’s attendance)

pursuant to the employment relationship with such public

agency.

For purposes of this section, the amount paid such employee in

accordance with subparagraph (A) for the performance of court

reporting transcript preparation duties, shall not be considered

in the calculation of the regular rate at which such employee

is employed.’’.
H. R. 1225—2

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

The amendments made by section 2 shall apply after the date

of the enactment of this Act and with respect to actions brought

in a court after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-13-0799 SAT Date: 8/16/2013 Print Date: 9/30/2013
Related cases : Health related cases : Ecotox related cases: Analogs:

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1 3

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 2 11

Exposure Based Review : Health: Ecotox: N o Routes of exposure : Health: N o exposures needed Ecotox: Fate: ; Keywords : Keywords: AQUATOX Summary of Assessment : Fate : Fate Summary: P-13-0799 FATE:

log Koc = 1.78 (E) log Fish BCF = 2.94 (E) log Fish BAF = 2.19 (E)POTW removal (%) = 76 via sorption Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = mo Sorption to soils/sediments = strong PBT Potential: P2B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl - slow
Health : Health Summary: N ot absorbed through the skin as the neat material; p oo r absorption through the skin if in solution; moderate absorption from the lung and GI tract ( p che m ). N o significant health concerns.
Ecotox : Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments
fish 96-h LC50 0.26 daphnid 48-h LC50 0.21 green algal 96-h EC50 0.045 fish

_ chronic value 0.008 daphnid

_ chronic value 0.084 algal

_ chronic value 0.15 Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for ; SAR chemical class = ; MW (P); p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;
Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 1

SARs SAR Class Ecotox Category N one Ecotox Factors Comments: SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
# L_2020244EN.01000801.xml

| 29.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 244/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 244/8

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2020/1111

of 20 July 2020

on the signing, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Government of the People’s Republic of China on cooperation on, and protection of, geographical indications

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 207(4), in conjunction with Article 218(5) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 10 September 2010, the Council authorised the Commission to open negotiations with the Government of the People’s Republic of China for an Agreement on cooperation on, and protection of, geographical indications. The negotiations were successfully concluded by the initialling of the Agreement between the European Union and the Government of the People’s Republic of China on cooperation on, and protection of, geographical indications (‘the Agreement’). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 10 September 2010, the Council authorised the Commission to open negotiations with the Government of the People’s Republic of China for an Agreement on cooperation on, and protection of, geographical indications. The negotiations were successfully concluded by the initialling of the Agreement between the European Union and the Government of the People’s Republic of China on cooperation on, and protection of, geographical indications (‘the Agreement’).

| (2) | The Agreement seeks to obtain the highest possible level of protection for geographical indications and to provide instruments to counter deceptive practices and wrongful uses of geographical indications. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Agreement seeks to obtain the highest possible level of protection for geographical indications and to provide instruments to counter deceptive practices and wrongful uses of geographical indications.

| (3) | The Agreement should be signed on behalf of the Union, subject to its conclusion at a later date, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Agreement should be signed on behalf of the Union, subject to its conclusion at a later date,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The signing on behalf of the Union of the Agreement between the European Union and the Government of the People’s Republic of China on cooperation on, and protection of, geographical indications is hereby authorised, subject to the conclusion of the said Agreement (1).

Article 2

The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to sign the Agreement on behalf of the Union.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 20 July 2020.

For the Council

The President

J. KLOECKNER

---

(1)  The text of the Agreement will be published together with the decision on its conclusion.

1

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 8, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41670

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARCO TULIO MENDOZA-GOMEZ

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:06-CR-461-1

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgmentin a Criminal Case, Marco Tulio Mendoza-Gomez

raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523

U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision

and not a separate criminal offense. The appellant's motion for summary

disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000857501 
<NAME>                        Nelx, Inc.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                         15,063
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         193,829
<DEPRECIATION>                                 114,266
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 94,626
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          113,275
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       4,635
<OTHER-SE>                                     (50,875)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   (44,490)
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               6,913
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (6,913)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,913)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,913)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
#### Walter J. Kosinski *vs.*Genevieve Kosinski.

Maltbie, C. J., Haines, Hinman, Banks and Avery, Js.

Argued May 2d

decided June 5th, 1934.

*Thomas C. Flood,*for the appellant (defendant).

*Leonard O. Ryan,*for the appellee (plaintiff).

Per Curiam.

The jury might reasonably have found the following facts: The plaintiff on the morning of November 29th, 1932, went with the defendant, his daughter, to the garage to help her start her car. He told her to put it in high gear and then while she sat in it he pushed it out of the garage. After he had succeeded in pushing it to a point where the rear end was six or seven feet outside of the garage, the engine caught and he stepped back. Then suddenly the car backed and pinned him between the right rear corner of the car and the door of the garage. The defendant did not testify, and no evidence was in any *702way produced to dispute the plaintiff’s testimony. From the fact that the plaintiff had been able unaided to push the car out of the garage while in gear, the jury might reasonably have inferred that the surface of the ground in front of the garage did not slope markedly toward it. With that in mind, taken together with the fact that, when the car backed, it did so suddenly, the jury were entitled to infer that the cause of the backing was that the defendant put the car in reverse and did not have it under proper control. They might reasonably have concluded that the defendant was guilty of negligence. The plaintiff testified that when the car started to back, he was only five or six feet behind it and it came so quickly that he could not get out of the way. Confronted as he was by an emergency, the jury might well have found that he was not guilty of contributory negligence.

The plaintiff was a storekeeper and he testified that he was compelled on account of his injuries to hire his son, who was about twenty-one years old, to carry on the business for him for seven weeks, agreeing to pay him $25 a week, and also to perform certain services for eight weeks thereafter, for which he agreed to pay $4 or $5 a week. The jury might reasonably have accepted this testimony. Taking into consideration the expenses thereby incurred by the plaintiff, certain other special damages he proved and the personal injuries he suffered, the trial court might reasonably conclude that the jury was justified in returning a verdict in the amount they did.

There is no error.
No. 76-1354.

#### Angle, dba Kansas Refined Helium Co. *v.*National Labor Relations Board et al.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
# L_2020212EN.01000101.xml

| 3.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 212/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 212/1

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2020/947

of 26 June 2020

on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union and its Member States, of a Protocol amending the Common Aviation Area Agreement between the European Union and its Member States and the Republic of Moldova, to take account of the accession to the European Union of the Republic of Croatia

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 100(2), in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a) thereof,

Having regard to the Act of Accession of Croatia, and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 6(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Having regard to the consent of the European Parliament (1),

Whereas:

| (1) | In accordance with Council Decision (EU) 2015/1389 (2), the Protocol amending the Common Aviation Area Agreement between the European Union and its Member States and the Republic of Moldova (3), to take account of the accession to the European Union of the Republic of Croatia (‘the Protocol’) has been signed, subject to its conclusion. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In accordance with Council Decision (EU) 2015/1389 (2), the Protocol amending the Common Aviation Area Agreement between the European Union and its Member States and the Republic of Moldova (3), to take account of the accession to the European Union of the Republic of Croatia (‘the Protocol’) has been signed, subject to its conclusion.

| (2) | The Protocol should be approved, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Protocol should be approved,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Protocol amending the Common Aviation Area Agreement between the European Union and its Member States and the Republic of Moldova, to take account of the accession to the European Union of the Republic of Croatia (4) is hereby approved on behalf of the Union and its Member States.

Article 2

The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to deposit, on behalf of the Union and its Member States, the instrument of approval provided for in Article 3 of the Protocol.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 26 June 2020.

For the Council

The President

A. METELKO-ZGOMBIĆ

---

(1)  Consent of 17 June 2020 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

1

(2)  Council Decision (EU) 2015/1389 of 7 May 2015 on the signing, on behalf of the Union and its Member States, and provisional application of a Protocol amending the Common Aviation Area Agreement between the European Union and its Member States and the Republic of Moldova, to take account of the accession to the European Union of the Republic of Croatia (OJ L 215, 14.8.2015, p. 1).

2

(3)  The text of the Agreement is published in OJ L 292, 20.10.2012, p. 3.

3

(4)  The text of the Protocol was published in OJ L 215 of 14 August 2015, together with the decision on its signing.

4

---
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2541 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2541

 To establish an Assistant Secretary of State for Diplomatic Security.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 26, 1995

  Mr. Gilman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                  Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To establish an Assistant Secretary of State for Diplomatic Security.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF STATE FOR DIPLOMATIC 
              SECURITY.

    There shall be in the Department of State an Assistant Secretary of 
State for Diplomatic Security who shall be responsible to the Secretary 
of State for matters relating to diplomatic security. The Assistant 
Secretary shall have substantial professional qualifications in the 
field of law enforcement, intelligence, or security and shall be 
appointed and compensated as provided under section 1(c)(1) of the 
State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; P01 Application.                    

*Date:*                         October 28, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Bethesda Marriott Suites, 6711 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20817.                    

*Contact Person:*                         D. G. Patel, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Room 756, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 594-7682,                         *pateldg@niddk.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: August 11, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-19889 Filed 8-18-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Acting Special Coordinator for the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment Matza’s Travel to Brazil 

# 											Acting Special Coordinator for the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment Matza’s Travel to Brazil 									

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

April 24, 2024

Acting Special Coordinator for the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment (PGI) Helaina Matza will travel to Rio de Janeiro and Brasilia April 24-26 to advance ongoing PGI-led efforts to facilitate strategic infrastructure investments in green transportation and logistics, critical minerals supply chains, and accelerating clean energy transformation in sectors such as agriculture and clean fuels.

PGI is working to expand its global economic corridor approach and identify quality, sustainable infrastructure opportunities in the Western Hemisphere.  While in Brazil, Acting Special Coordinator Matzawill meet with government officials as well as private sector partners to discuss potential infrastructure projects and financing opportunities.

Tags

BrazilBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonOffice of the U.S. Special Coordinator for the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and InvestmentOfficial International Travel

Back to Top
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1335

AN ACT

To provide for the extension of a hydroelectric project located

in the State of West Virginia.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the time period

5 specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16

6 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the Federal En7 ergy Regulatory Commission project numbered 7307, the
2

•HR 1335 EH

1 Commission shall, upon the request of the licensee for the

2 project, in accordance with the good faith, due diligence,

3 and public interest requirements of that section and the

4 Commission’s procedures under that section, extend the

5 time period during which the licensee is required to com6 mence construction of the project so as to terminate on

7 September 26, 1999.

8 (b) APPLICABILITY.—Subsection (a) shall take effect

9 for the project described in subsection (a) upon the expira10 tion of the extension, issued by the Commission under sec11 tion 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806), of the

12 period required for commencement of construction of the

13 project.

14 (c) REINSTATEMENT OF EXPIRED LICENSE.—If a li15 cense for the project described in subsection (a) has ex16 pired prior to the date of enactment of this Act, the Com17 mission shall reinstate the license effective as of the date

18 of its expiration and extend the time required for com19 mencement of construction of the project until September

20 26, 1999.

Passed the House of Representatives November 13,

1995.

Attest:

Clerk.
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1335

AN ACT

To provide for the extension of a hydroelectric

project located in the State of West Virginia.