alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2012 - 0 810 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2011 -NM - 1 95 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR - M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Man ager**  **Date**
. AC NO: *e-33*

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

SUBJECT: TECJ!INICAL INFORMATION REGARDING CIVIL AERONAUTICS

l@NWLS 1, 3, 4% 4b 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 13, ad 14

1 l PURPOSE. This circular is to advise the public that such policy

information as is contained in Civil Aeronautics Manuals (CAMS)

1, 3, L+a, &b, 5, 6, 7, 9, 13, and 14, may be used in conjunction with

specific sections of the Federal Aviation Regulations which correspond

with the sections of the Civil Air Regulations to which the policies

are applicable, upon recodification effective February 1, 1965.

CAM 8 may be used in conjunction with FAR 21.25, FAR 21,185, and

FAR 21.187 for restricted category certification of small agricultural

airplanes only.

2 l CANCELLATION. AC No. 2O+A dated 3/7/75 is cancelled. The reference

to CAM 8 has been reinstated for small agricultural airplanes.

3 l INFDRMATION.

a. Civil Aeronautics Manual policies provide detailed technical

information on acceptable methods of complying with the regulations. Such policies are for the guidance of the public and

are not mandatory.

b . CAMs covering the certification of products should not be

discarded by interested persons upon recodification, because

the rules contained therein, and accompanying policies, will

continue to apply to products which have been certificated

thereunder.

CO Policies applicable to sections of the Federal Aviation

Regulations will be contained in the future Advisory Circular

issuances, which will update and replace the CAM materials.

-/ I-Acting Director, Flight Standards Service

. Initiated by: AFs480

38881
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Ref: 8P-AR REGION 8 1595 Wynkoop Street DENVER, CO 80202-1129 Phone 800-227-8917 http://www

.epa.gov/region08

Mr. Dave Klemp, Bureau Chief Air Resources Management B\1reau Montana Department ofEnvironmental Quality Post Office Box 200901 Helena, Montana 59620-0901
Dear Mr. Klemp:
Thank you for submitting the 2015 MontanaAnnual Monitoring Network Plan (AMNP), the 5-Year Monitoring Network Assessment and associated cover letter dated July 1, 2015. Region 8has reviewed the submitted documents and found that all ofthe requirements specified in 40 CFRPart 58.10, as well as the 105 grant commitment to conduct a review annually and an assessment every 5 years,have been met with the submission ofthese documents. Region 8 approves the proposed network changes, described in Section II, Subsection B ofthe AMNP, to the PM2.s monitoring network as specified in the table below:
Site Name AQS ID Number Change St Luke's 30-111-0085 Remove non-FEM/FRM monitor, install FEM to collect regulatory data Removed Co-located Met One BAM. No longer Missoula- Boyd Park 30-063-0024 required by CFR {PM2.s will still be monitored atthis site) Helena Rossiter 30-049-0026 Add Met One BAM from Boyd Park site for comparison against the Thermo 5014i BAM Region 8 appreciates the effort that Montanaput into its 5-Year Monitoring Network Assessment. The Assessment is an important tool for states to (1) re-evaluate the objectives and budget for air monitoring, (2) evaluate a network's effectiveness and efficiency relative to its objectives and costs, and (3) develop recommendations for network reconfigurations and improvements. While this Assessment did not propose any immediate changes to the network, it shows the effort that Montanahas made in future planning oftheir ambient air monitoring network.Ifyou have any questions, contact me at (303) 312-6416 or Joshua

# Ricka**d,** ofmy staff, at (303) 312- 6460. I

cc: Annette Williams, MTDEQ Doug Kuenzli, MTDEQ

# CJ~ Carl Daly,

# Direc**~** Air Program
39998, 40011.

#### ETHERIDGE MOTORS, INC. v. HAYNIE; and vice versa.

Decided April 2, 1963

Rehearing denied April 24, 1963.

*Merritt .& Pruitt, Glyndon C. Pruitt,*for plaintiff in error.

*Joseph E. Cheeley, Hamilton Lohey,*contra..

•Eberhardt, Judge.

The motion was granted on ground 5 only, wherein error was assigned upon the charge that “if the plaintiff, by the exercise of ordinary care, *and by the use of his sight,*could have avoided the negligence of the defendant, if any, and if you find from the'evidence in this case that the plaintiff *675herein has *failed to use his sense of sight,*then he could not be entitled to recover, even though you might find that the defendant was negligent.” (Emphasis added). Apparently the trial judge concluded that this charge had the effect, in the event the jury should find that the plaintiff had failed to use his sense of sight to discover defendant’s negligence, of removing the issue of comparative negligence from their consideration, and further had the effect of instructing the jury that the exercise of ordinary care would necessarily include his use of the sense of sight.

We agree that the charge was erroneous. It is the province of the jury to determine what act or failure to act may have constituted ordinary care under the circumstances. “For the Judge to tell the jury that under such circumstances it was the duty of the defendant to ‘keep a reasonable lookout,’ ‘to give warning signals such as will apprise them of an approaching train,’ and ‘to moderate the speed of its train so as to enable them to escape injury,’ was in effect telling them what acts consituted ordinary care and as such was erroneous, [citations]” *Hunt v. Pollard,*55 Ga. App. 423, 427 (190 SE 71).

In his cross-bill of exceptions plaintiff assigns error upon the denial of a new trial on the three remaining special grounds, all of which are exceptions to portions of the charge in which the court gave the legal definition of a “licensee” and stated the duty owing by the owner or occupier of premises to a licensee. It is asserted that since this court held on the previous appeal that under the facts pleaded plaintiff was an invitee and not a mere licensee, and since the evidence supporting the allegations there dealt with (see third division of the former opinion, 103 Ga. App. 676, 680, supra) was uncontradicted, the issue of whether plaintiff was a licensee was not in the case and, in that respect, the charge was not adjusted to the evidence. We agree that these grounds of the amended motion are also meritorious and that a new trial should have been granted on them as well as on ground 5. *Carmichael v. Silvers,*90 Ga. App. 804, 819 (2) (84 SE2d 668). Moreover, it was uncontradicted that the agent in charge of the defendant’s place of business was aware of the presence of plaintiff on the premises and under this circumstance the duty owed to him, whether a licensee or an invitee, *676was that of ordinary care. *Herrin v. Lamar,*106 Ga. App. 91 (1) (126 SE2d 454).

*Judgment affirmed on main bill of exceptions; reversed on cross-bill.*

*Felton, C. J., and Russell, J., concur.*
# Waiver of Restriction On Providing Funds To The Palestinian Authority

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State

 By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 7040(b) of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2009 (Division H, Public Law 111-8) (the “Act”), I hereby certify that it is important to the national security interests of the United States to waive the provisions of section 7040(a) of the Act, in order to provide funds appropriated to carry out chapter 4 of part II of the Foreign Assistance Act, as amended, to the Palestinian Authority.

                    You are directed to transmit this determination to the Congress, with a report pursuant to section 7040(d) of the Act, and to publish the determination in the                     *Federal Register*.                

[FR Doc. E9-20013

Billing code 4710-10-P
|                                          |
|------------------------------------------|
|                                          |  |  |
|                                     |   |   |
| Entity                                   |   | State of Formation |
| R/C IV Non-U.S. LOS Corp                 |   | Delaware |
| Liberty Oilfield Services New HoldCo LLC |   | Delaware |
| Liberty Oilfield Services LLC            |   | Delaware |
| LOS Acquisition CO I LLC (1)             |   | Delaware |
| Titan Frac Services LLC (2)              |   | Delaware |
| LOS Cibolo RE Investments, LLC           |   | Texas |
| LOS Odessa RE Investments, LLC           |   | Texas |
# Federal Aviation Administration

RGL Home **Advisory Circular****Advisory Circular Information****Advisory Circular Information**** ****AC Number:**AC 20-35C**Date:**07/12/1983** ****Change Description:**** ****Subject:**Tiedown Sense** ****Related Regulation(s):**Unknown Part**Section Number(s):**Unknown Section** ****Cancels:****Initiating Office:**AFS-340** ****Advisory Circular in PDF Format:**** ****Comments****Comments**
Comments:
FAA.gov Home |			Privacy Policy |			Web Policies & Notices |			Contact Us |			Help

**Readers & Viewers:**PDF Reader | MS Word Viewer | MS PowerPoint Viewer | MS Excel Viewer | Zip
Order entered January 11 , 2023

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 22

- 00354

- CV

PAMELLA JOINER , Appellant

V.

THE WEITZMAN GROUP, INC. , Appellee

On Appeal from the 68t h Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 19

- 16489

O RDER

Before the Court is appellant’s January 9, 2023 fourth motion for extension

of time to file her brief. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to January

30, 2023 . We caution appellant that further extension requests will be disfavored.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
HomeAssisted Schools...Rome, Italy: American Overseas School of Rome: 2024 Special Needs Profile

# 									Rome, Italy: American Overseas School of Rome: 2024 Special Needs Profile							

Special Needs Profile

Office of Overseas Schools

February 22, 2024

## 								School Contact Information							

        -  Tel: + 39-06-3343-8331 | Overseas School Fact Sheet | Regional Education Officer: Tim Stuart 
        -  E-mail: communications@aosr.org,admissions@aosr.org | Website: www.aosr.org 
        -  Additional details on special needs support at post found on the **School Summary Information Portal**(must have OKTA login to access).  For more information, contact A/OPR/OS (**overseasschools@state.gov** / +1-202-261-8200), MED/CFP Child and Family Program Team (**MEDCFP@state.gov**/ +1-202-663-1815), or the school directly.    

**Download the Special Needs Profile** (Rome AOSR 2024 Special Needs Italy) for this school to learn more about their capability to support students with exceptionalities.

 

The **American Overseas School of Rome** is an independent, coeducational day school for students of all nationalities from prekindergarten through grade 12 and post-graduate year. The school was founded in 1947. The school year comprises two semesters extending from September through January and from January through June.

*This is intended to provide general information. Prospective users of the schools may wish to inquire further of A/OPR/OS or contact the school directly for more specific and up-to-the-minute information. Information and statistics are current as of December 2023 and provided by the school.*

NOTE: School situations can change quickly, particularly as schools face cutbacks to learning support programs due to the pandemic, unrest, and economic uncertainty. For the most current information, work with the REO and school. Information in this document was collected by the Department of State’s Office of Overseas Schools directly from the school in December 2023 and shows the availability of services rather than an assessment of the quality of the services. The profile is intended as a jumping off point for a conversation with the REO and school to understand the best fit for your child. Definitions may vary school to school.

Tags

ItalyOffice of Overseas Schools

Back to Top
STATES

UNITED

BATHYMETRIC MAP

Pibtubes ce Washagran DE
US. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
MATIORUAL OCEANEC AND ATMOREHEDC ACWINEETRATION
WADONAL GCEAN SRvICE
1908

SATHYMETRE CONTOUR MNTTIVAYS SE MAETERS TO Mnatonnsns [HFT

DATUnh WEAN LOWER SOW WANE

PUNTER MERCATDE PICTON.
Seale 1250.00

PACIRC OCEAN
PATTON RIDGE

PATTON RIDGE
NOS NI 10-12
# L_2021065DE.01007901.xml

| 25.2.2021 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 65/79 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2021

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 65/79

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) 2020/2229 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 23. Dezember 2020 zur Änderung des Beschlusses Nr. 445/2014/EU zur Einrichtung einer Aktion der Europäischen Union ür die „Kulturhauptstädte Europas“ im Zeitraum 2020 bis 2033

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 437 vom 28. Dezember 2020
  )

Seite „Inhalt“ und Seite 116, Titel:

Anstatt:

„Verordnung (EU) 2020/2229 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 23. Dezember 2020 zur Änderung des Beschlusses Nr. 445/2014/EU zur Einrichtung einer Aktion der Europäischen Union ür die ‚Kulturhauptstädte Europas‘ im Zeitraum 2020 bis 2033“

muss es heißen:

„Beschluss (EU) 2020/2229 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 23. Dezember 2020 zur Änderung des Beschlusses Nr. 445/2014/EU zur Einrichtung einer Aktion der Europäischen Union für die ‚Kulturhauptstädte Europas‘ im Zeitraum 2020 bis 2033“.

---
#### § 50.101 State causes of action preempted.

All State causes of action of any kind for property damage, personal injury, or death arising out of or resulting from an act of terrorism that are otherwise available under state law are preempted, except that, pursuant to section 107(b) of the Act, nothing in this section shall limit in any way the liability of any government, organization, or person who knowingly participates in, conspires to commit, aids and abets, or commits the act of terrorism certified by the Secretary.
BATHYMETRIC MAP

PERVENETS CANYON EAST
NOS NO 1-2

BATIPAMETIIC CONTOUR MUTERVALA 11) METRES TO Menton PIMA
‘Summ rneNTE We > AMETER aTERCALS.

Daca. ALANS LOWEN LD WATE

asain UiRAton LAST
t = Pimadla meses = ponnee
—4.
§ 15.737-19 Administrative Law Judge. ( a ) *Appointment.* An Administrative Law Judge appointed as provided by 5 U.S.C. 3105 (1966), shall conduct proceedings upon complaints for the administrative disciplinary proceedings under this part.
( b ) *Power of Administrative Law Judge.* Among other powers, the Administrative Law Judge shall have authority, in connection with any proceeding assigned or referred to him/her, to do the following: ( 1 ) Administer oaths and affirmations;
( 2 ) Make rulings upon motions and requests, which rulings may not be appealed from prior to the close of a hearing except, at the discretion of the Administrative Law Judge, in extraordinary circumstances;
( 3 ) Determine the time and place of hearing and regulate its course and conduct;
( 4 ) Adopt rules of procedure and modify the same from time to time as occasion requires for the orderly disposition of proceedings;
( 5 ) Rule upon offers of proof, receive relevant evidence, and examine witnesses;
( 6 ) Take or authorize the taking of depositions;
( 7 ) Receive and consider oral or written argument on facts or law;
( 8 ) Hold or provide for the holding of conferences for the settlement or simplification of the issues by consent of the parties;
( 9 ) Assess the responsible party extraordinary costs attributable to the location of a hearing;
( 10 ) Perform such acts and take such measures as are necessary or appropriate to the efficient conduct of any proceeding; and
( 11 ) Make initial decisions.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 158 (Tuesday, August 18, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 41741]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19626]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

United States Parole Commission


Public Announcement: Pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine 
Act (Pub. L. 94-409) [5 U.S.C. Section 552b]

Agency Holding Meeting: Department of Justice, United States Parole 
Commission.

Date and Time: 2 p.m., Thursday, August 20, 2009.

Place: U.S. Parole Commission, 5550 Friendship Boulevard, 4th Floor, 
Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815.

Status: Closed.

Matters Considered: The following matter will be considered during the 
closed meeting: One consideration of an original jurisdiction case 
pursuant to 28 CFR 2.27.

Agency Contact: Thomas W. Hutchison, Chief of Staff, United States 
Parole Commission, (301) 492-5990.

    Dated: August 11, 2009.
Rockne Chickinell,
General Counsel, U.S. Parole Commission.
[FR Doc. E9-19626 Filed 8-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-31-M
Motion Granted and Order filed May 17, 2013 .

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14 - 12 - 003 48 - CV

____________ SUSAN MEEK, M.D. , Appellant

V. ROCKNE ONSTAD INDIVI DUALLY AND D/B/A THE ONSTAD LAW FIRM AND JOYCE STAMP LILL Y INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A JOYCE

STAMP LILLY, RN, JDP C , Appellee s

&

____________ NO. 14 - 12 - 00463 - CV

____________ ROCKNE ONSTAD INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A THE ONSTAD LAW FIRM AND JOYCE STAMP LILLY INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A JOYCE

STAMP LILLY, RN, JDPC, Appell ants

V. SUSAN MEEK, M.D., AppelleeOn Appeal from the 268th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 07 - DCV - 156522

ORDER On April 11, 2012, Susan Meek, M.D., filed a notice of appeal from the judgment signed December 29, 2011, and the ap peal was assigned to this court under our appellate number 14

- 12

- 00348

- CV. On May 9, 2012, Rockne Onstad Individually and d/b/a The Onstad Law Firm and Joyce Stamp Lilly, Individually and d/b/a Joyce Stamp Lilly, RN, JDPC, filed a notice of cross

- appeal f rom the same judgment, which was assigned to this court under our appellate number 14

- 12

- 00

- 463

- CV. On April 22, 201 3 , Rockne Onstad Individually and d/b/a The Onstad Law Firm and Joyce Stamp Lilly, Individually and d/b/a Joyce Stamp Lilly, RN, JDPC, file d a motion to consolidate the related appeals. The motion is GRANTED and we issue the following order: We order the appeals pending under our appellate case numbers 14

- 12

- 00 348

- CV and 14

- 12

- 00 463

- CV CONSOLIDATED. Further, in appeal 14

- 12

- 00348

- CV, appellant’s brief is due May 24, 2013
. In appeal 14

- 12

- 00463

- CV, appellee’s brief is due June 3, 2013.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Jamison, and Busby.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 315.72 [Reserved]
#### Janice Calendar, Respondent, v Gregory Mnasin et al., Appellants.

[806 NYS2d 629]

In an action to recover damages for negligence, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruditzky, J.), dated July 19, 2004, as denied that branch of their motion which was to compel the plaintiff to execute an authorization for the release of her medical records at St. Mary’s Hospital.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The records of the plaintiffs treatment for drug addiction which the defendants sought and which were the subject of their motion to compel are not relevant to the injuries the plaintiff sustained since the plaintiff did not place her mental or emotional condition at issue in this action *(see Goldberg v Fenig,*300 AD2d 439 [2002]; *Carboni v New York Med. Coll.,*290 AD2d 473 [2002]; *Cottrell v Weinstein,*270 AD2d 449 [2000]). Thus, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the defendants’ motion which was to compel the plaintiff to execute an authorization for the release of her medical records at St. Mary’s Hospital *(see Gandy v Larkins,*165 AD2d 862 [1990]). H. Miller, J.P., S. Miller, Goldstein, Mastro and Lifson, JJ., concur.
Rasheed at Wathinger, DC

= oe

ap sme ron ne Sede mr St US. DEFARTMENT GF COMMERCE
Foe a py dae So arms Toe tones 9 ae cae be oro NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMCHAWEEIC ADWHISTAATION
oe NATIONAL OCEAN SFRMICE
et a nn
met om serie mt - 1988
wet ery toe ee a ON Doe Caremeal Sd Dts Pewee Doge
So ponent On mer ne att Peart comy beatin Ne ah pe ie is
exes Ciiaes Serene Seren petits hen te comes tgemenee tems BATHEMERNIC CONPOUE REIRVALS. 1 MAINES TO WAILMUIM SEFTIY
is Bove aratty ar) eet nettevLt
— ANN Saban YOR AEt me WATE
araveane rec xvER PRONCO
‘Seale 1330000 ‘a
Tene prem raed = bo yl eer
Tae al 1 in = 3 wee

4 r : = es
**Exhibit
32.1**
 
 Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
 Sarbanes
- Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of PLM Equipment Growth Fund V (the
“Partnership”), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, the President of the General Partner and of the Partnership, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
 
 (1)  the
Report of the Partnership filed today fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.
 
 
 
 
 /s/
James A. Coyne
 James A.
Coyne
 President
of PLM Financial Services, Inc
 August
10, 2005