alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                             |
|---------------------------------------------|
|                                             |  |  |
| Entity                                      |   | Jurisdiction |
|                                        |   |   |
| Canada Goose Inc.                           |   | Ontario |
| Canada Goose Trading Inc.                   |   | Ontario |
| Canada Goose International Holdings Limited |   | United Kingdom |
| Canada Goose US, Inc.                       |   | Delaware |
| Canada Goose Europe AB                      |   | Switzerland |
| Canada Goose International AG               |   | Zug (Switzerland) |
| Canada Goose Services Limited               |   | United Kingdom |
| Canada Goose UK Retail Limited              |   | United Kingdom |
Exhibit 10.11


Employment Agreement Termination


  


TERMINATION AGREEMENT


 


This termination agreement represents
the mutual agreement by Access National Bank and Charles Wimer ("Employee") to terminate the employment agreement dated
December 15, 1999 between Access National Bank and Charles Wimer ("Original Agreement"). This termination is effective
June 4, 2012. Both parties agree that all of the terms and obligations under the Original Agreement will be of no further force
and effect, and that the Employee may continue employment with Access National Bank as an at-will employee.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto
have each executed this termination agreement on June 4, 2012.


 


Access National Bank


 


	 	/s/Martin S. Friedman	 	/s/Michael W. Clarke
	By:	Martin S. Friedman	 	Michael W. Clarke
	 	Chair, Compensation Committee	 	President, CEO


 


	/s/Charles Wimer	 
	Charles Wimer
#### § 34.506 Reports—Spill Impact Component.

Recipients must submit reports as prescribed by the Council or Treasury. In addition, the Council must submit reports as prescribed by Treasury.
- Under Secretary Home
- About Us
- Remarks and Releases
- Supply Chain Ministerial
- Americas Partnership
- I2U2
- Minerals Security Partnership

HomeUnder Secretary for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment...About Us – Under Secretary for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment

# 									About Us							

Under Secretary for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment

The Under Secretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment (E) leads the State Department’s efforts to develop and implement international policies related to economic growth, energy, agriculture, the ocean, the environment, and science and technology.

The Assistant Secretaries of the functional bureaus and offices in the E family advise the Under Secretary and guide the policy direction within their jurisdiction. They include the following:
        - Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs
        - Bureau of Energy Resources
        - Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs
        - Office of Global Food Security
        - Office of Global Partnerships
        - Office of the Chief Economist
        - Office of the Science and Technology Adviser

These officials work closely under the leadership of the Under Secretary and with the Department’s regional bureaus and U.S. embassies and Consulates overseas to:
        - Advance the Department’s economic development agenda;
        - Elevate and intensify our efforts related to energy security, clean energy, and environmental sustainability; and
        - Foster innovation through robust science, entrepreneurship, and technology policies.

In order to effectively advance U.S. economic diplomacy and ensure close coordination on economic policy, a deputy assistant secretary (DAS) in each of the Department’s regional bureaus is designated as the bureau lead on economic issues. These “Economic DASes” also serve as their bureau’s primary contact on regional and cross-cutting economic issues with the E Family.

Management of economic affairs within a regional bureau is determined by the regional assistant secretary. All senior officials will generally maintain the lead on economic issues within their specific portfolio. The economic DASes are the respective bureau’s senior lead on cross-cutting and regional economic issues.

Back to Top
UNITED STATES BATHYMETRIC MAP HYDROGRAPHER CANYON

ae

—_ bide ot Warrkergton OC {
=| > : us Deeanilent OF Coueace ra —— HYDROGRAPHER CANYON
S| 35 wanonal Gcenne aha Muda ABMET#ATON pean

1978

iC CONTOUR AUTERVALS. 10 METERS 5D 700 sattte DERM
: SUPREUENTED fF 2 SAETER WATTEVALS THENCE 50) METERS 7D WAX
= UM Derm

DATUM. MEAN LOW warte me |

eAAeTvENRE MERCATOR RALECTION
Sinle L2sn0Ce
#### Robert J. CHIDLOW, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, Respondent.

No. 00-3199.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 9, 2001.

Before MAYER, Chief Judge, MICHEL and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges.

Judgment

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having .been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

*AFFIRMED. See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by T.D. 9359, 72 FR 54544, Sept. 26, 2007.

§ 10.53 Receipt of information concerning practitioner. ( a ) *Officer or employee of the Internal Revenue Service.* If an officer or employee of the Internal Revenue Service has reason to believe a practitioner has violated any provision of this part, the officer or employee will promptly make a written report of the suspected violation. The report will explain the facts and reasons upon which the officer's or employee's belief rests and must be submitted to the office(s) of the Internal Revenue Service responsible for administering or enforcing this part.
( b ) *Other persons.* Any person other than an officer or employee of the Internal Revenue Service having information of a violation of any provision of this part may make an oral or written report of the alleged violation to the office(s) of the Internal Revenue Service responsible for administering or enforcing this part or any officer or employee of the Internal Revenue Service. If the report is made to an officer or employee of the Internal Revenue Service, the officer or employee will make a written report of the suspected violation and submit the report to the office(s) of the Internal Revenue Service responsible for administering or enforcing this part.
( c ) *Destruction of report.* No report made under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section shall be maintained unless retention of the report is permissible under the applicable records control schedule as approved by the National Archives and Records Administration and designated in the Internal Revenue Manual. Reports must be destroyed as soon as permissible under the applicable records control schedule.
( d ) *Effect on proceedings under subpart D.* The destruction of any report will not bar any proceeding under subpart D of this part, but will preclude the use of a copy of the report in a proceeding under subpart D of this part.
( e ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section is applicable beginning August 2, 2011.
[T.D. 9527, 76 FR 32308, June 3, 2011]
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Attack on the African Union Transition Mission in Somalia

# 									Attack on the African Union Transition Mission in Somalia							

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

May 26, 2023

The United States strongly condemns today’s attack by Al-Shabaab in Buulo Mareer on the Ugandan peacekeeping forces deployed to the African Union Transition Mission (ATMIS) in Somalia.  We express our deepest condolences to the victims’ families and friends and wish a full recovery to those injured.  The United States commends the bravery and sacrifice of the troops participating in this important mission.  We stand with our Somali and African Union partners in the fight to defeat terrorism and to advance peace and stability for the Somali people.

Tags

African UnionBureau of African AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonSomaliaUganda

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>    5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such on Form 10-QSB
for the nine months period ended September 30, 1996.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         188,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  556,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               744,000
<PP&E>                                      55,286,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              38,833,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,197,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       28,641,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                  (11,444,000)
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,197,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,044,000
<CGS>                                        1,049,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,566,000                     
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,751,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,766,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,522,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,522,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,522,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Artemis Accords Foster Peaceful Space Cooperation

# 									Artemis Accords Foster Peaceful Space Cooperation							

Fact Sheet

Office of the Spokesperson

May 11, 2022

The Artemis Accords bring together nations through a common set of principles to guide civil space exploration, setting the stage for peaceful, responsible, and productive cooperation in space affairs. Through robust space diplomacy from the Department of State and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), and the leadership of Vice President Kamala Harris, the Accords have grown to 19 national signatories from nearly every region of the world.

As of May 10, 2022, signatories include Australia, Bahrain, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Israel, Italy, Japan, the Republic of Korea, Luxembourg, Mexico, New Zealand, Poland, Romania, Singapore, Ukraine, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.  By signing the Artemis Accords, these nations affirm their commitment to key principles, grounded in the Outer-Space Treaty of 1967:  peaceful purposes, transparency, interoperability, emergency assistance, registration of space objects, release of scientific data, protection of space heritage, safe and sustainable use of space resources, deconfliction of activities, and mitigation of orbital debris, including disposal of spacecraft.

Artemis Accords signatories hope to facilitate further peaceful collaboration in space, including through NASA’s Artemis program which seeks to put the first woman and first person of color on the Moon and build the foundation for human missions to Mars.  The Artemis program will be the broadest and most diverse international human space exploration coalition in history.

The principles of the Artemis Accords play a significant role in our civil space cooperation and diplomacy efforts, and cooperation between Accords signatories is not limited to the Artemis program.  Such collaboration between signatories ranges from space and Earth science to aeronautics research.

The United States will continue encouraging more nations to sign the Artemis Accords, and in doing so, build a more peaceful, cooperative space future.

For media inquiries, please contact OES-PA-DG@state.gov.

Tags

Artemis AccordsBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonSpace

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 315.5 General rules. ( a ) *Registration is conclusive of ownership.* Savings bonds are issued only in registered form. The registration must express the actual ownership of, and interest in, the bond. The registration is conclusive of ownership, except as provided in § 315.49.
( b ) *Requests for registration.* Registrations requested must be clear, accurate and complete, conform substantially with one of the forms set forth in this subpart, and include the taxpayer identifying number of the owner or first-named coowner. The taxpayer identifying number of the second-named coowner or beneficiary is not required but its inclusion is desirable. The registration of all bonds owned by the same person, organization, or fiduciary should be uniform with respect to the name of the owner and any description of the fiduciary capacity. An individual should be designated by the name he or she is ordinarily known by or uses in business, including at least one full given name. The name may be preceded or followed by any applicable title, such as *Miss, Mr., Mrs., Ms., Dr., Rev., M.D.,* or *D.D..* A suffix, such as *Sr.* or *Jr.,* must be included when ordinarily used or when necessary to distinguish the owner from another member of his family. A married woman's own given name, not that of her husband, must be used; for example, *Mary A. Jones* or *Mrs. Mary A. Jones,* NOT *Mrs. Frank B. Jones.* The address must include, where appropriate, the number and street, route, or any other local feature, city, State, and ZIP Code.
Motion Granted , Appeal Dismisse d, and Memorandum Opinion filed

September 14 , 2021
.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 2 0

- 00 374

- CV

MCLANE COMPANY, INC. ; MCLANE FOODSERVICE, INC .; AND

GABRIEL A. GUAJARDO , Appellant s

V.
DANA MCCANN , Appellee
On Appeal from the 2 34 th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2019

- 62897

MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an interlocutory appeal from a n order signed March 24 , 202 0 denying a motion to compel arbitration . On August 27 , 2021, appellant s filed a n unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1 (a)(1) . The motion is granted , and the appeal is dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Panel c onsists of Justices Jewell, Spain, and Wilson

.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 344.9 How do I redeem a Demand Deposit security? ( a ) *When must I notify Treasury to redeem a security?* Demand Deposit securities can be redeemed at the owner's option, if we receive a request for redemption not less than: ( 1 ) One business day before the requested redemption date for total redemptions by an owner of $10 million or less;
( 2 ) Three business days before the requested redemption date for total redemptions by an owner of more than $10 million but less than $500 million; and
( 3 ) Five business days before the requested redemption date for total redemptions by an owner of $500 million or more.
( b ) *Can I request partial redemption of a security balance?* You may request partial redemptions in any amount. If your account balance is less than $1,000, it must be redeemed in total.
( c ) *Do I have to submit a request for redemption?* Yes. An official authorized to redeem the securities must submit an electronic request through SLGSafe. The request must show the Taxpayer Identification Number of the issuer, the security number, and the dollar amount of the securities to be redeemed. Fiscal Service must receive the request by 3 p.m., Eastern time on the required day. You cannot cancel the request.
[70 FR 37911, June 30, 2005, as amended at 89 FR 15450, Mar. 4, 2024]
IB

Union Calendar No. 173

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1366

[Report No. 104–322]

To authorize the extension of time limitation for the FERC-issued

hydroelectric license for the Mt. Hope Waterpower Project.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 30, 1995

Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Commerce

NOVEMBER 7, 1995

Additional sponsors: Mr. PAYNE of New Jersey, Mr. SAXTON, Mr. SMITH of

New Jersey, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. ZIMMER, Mr. ANDREWS, and Mr. MARTINI

NOVEMBER 7, 1995

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union

and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To authorize the extension of time limitation for the FERCissued hydroelectric license for the Mt. Hope Waterpower

Project.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1366 RH

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FERC PROJECT.

2 Notwithstanding the time limitations specified in sec3 tion 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806), the

4 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, upon the request

5 of the licensee for FERC Project No. 9401 (and after rea6 sonable notice), is authorized, in accordance with the good

7 faith, due diligence, and public interest requirements of

8 such section 13 and the Commission’s procedures under

9 such section, to extend the time required for commence10 ment of construction of such project until August 3, 1999.

Union Calendar No. 173

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1366

[Report No. 104–322]

A BILL

To authorize the extension of time limitation for

Hope Waterpower Project.the FERC-issued hydroelectric license for the Mt.

NOVEMBER 7, 1995

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Assistant Secretary Phee’s Travel to Nigeria, Chad, and Ghana

# 									Assistant Secretary Phee’s Travel to Nigeria, Chad, and Ghana							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

August 25, 2023

Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs Molly Phee will travel to Nigeria, Chad, and Ghana from August 25-29, 2023.  During this trip, she will engage with regional heads of state to discuss U.S. support for ECOWAS and regional leadership in responding to the crisis in Niger.  In Chad, she will review ongoing developments with neighbors, Niger and Sudan, as well as Chad’s political transition.  In all her conversations, she will raise the shared goals of preserving Niger’s hard-earned democracy and achieving the immediate release of President Bazoum, his family, and those members of his government unjustly detained.  Assistant Secretary Phee is also consulting with senior officials in Benin, Cote d’Ivoire, Senegal, and Togo, emphasizing U.S. support for the principled stand taken by ECOWAS in defense of democracy and constitutional order.

Tags

Bureau of African AffairsChadDemocracyGhanaNigeriaOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial International TravelRegional Issues

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
AAM-12-276-E 

May 31, 2012 

 Exemption No. 10549 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0304 

Mr. David Mino 

Tom Wood Aviation 

9913 Willow View Road 

Fishers, IN 46038 

Dear Mr. Mino: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated March 13, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Tom Wood Aviation for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Tom Wood Aviation, which 

is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees 

under one drug and alcohol testing program. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Tom Wood Aviation. 

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into 

one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that 

provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden 

the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs. 
2 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 9703; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 

also apply to the situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Tom Wood Aviation an exemption from 14 CFR 

part 120 to the extent necessary to allow Tom Wood Aviation, which is operating under 

separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing 

program, subject to the conditions and limitations described below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Tom Wood Aviation are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at 

all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

 2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the 

Tom Wood Aviation part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

This exemption terminates on May 31, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

James R. Fraser, M.D. 

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon 

Enclosure
City of Alpena 

ptfcMr X0^%- G'^O ^ 

C!TY HALL « 208 NORTH FIRST AVENUE * ALPENA, MICHIGAN 49707-2885 

www.alpena.mi.us 

United States of America 

Department of Transportation 

Office of the Secretary 

Washington, D.C. 

Kevin Adams, en 

As the newly elected Mayor of Alpena, I am requesting an extension to the RFP 

regarding Essential Air Service to Alpena, MI. I feel that our city council was not as 

involved in this process as they should have been, likely due to the fact that the airport is 

located outside of our city limits and they were under the impression that it was the 

responsibility of other entities. 

Any amount of time you can afford us would give me time to ensure that I have done 

everything I can for our community. I appreciate your consideration. 

Sincerely, 

Matthew J. Waligora 

Mayor of Alpena 

ALPENA