alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Partnership's  audited financial statements for the quarter ended April 30, 1997
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                                1,000
       
<S>                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                          APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                                      1,061
<SECURITIES>                                                5,603
<RECEIVABLES>                                              18,555
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            1,229
<PP&E>                                                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             25,771
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          64
<BONDS>                                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                                     0
<COMMON>                                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                                 25,707
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               25,771
<SALES>                                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            1,637
<CGS>                                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 345
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             1,292
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         1,292
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 0
<CHANGES>                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                                1,292
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                2.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                2.32
        

</TABLE>
§ 601.102 Classification of taxes collected by the Internal Revenue Service. ( a ) *Principal divisions.* Internal revenue taxes fall generally into the following principal divisions: ( 1 ) Taxes collected by assessment.
( 2 ) Taxes collected by means of revenue stamps.
( b ) *Assessed taxes.* Taxes collected principally by assessment fall into the following two main classes: ( 1 ) Taxes within the jurisdiction of the U.S. Tax Court. These include: ( i ) Income and profits taxes imposed by Chapters 1 and 2 of the 1939 Code and taxes imposed by subtitle A of the 1954 Code, relating to income taxes.
( ii ) Estate taxes imposed by Chapter 3 of the 1939 Code and Chapter 11 of the 1954 Code.
( iii ) Gift tax imposed by Chapter 4 of the 1939 Code and Chapter 12 of the 1954 Code.
( iv ) The tax on generation-skipping transfers imposed by Chapter 13 of the 1954 Code.
( v ) Taxes imposed by Chapters 41 through 44 of the 1954 Code.
( 2 ) Taxes not within the jurisdiction of the U.S. Tax Court. Taxes not imposed by Chapter 1, 2, 3, or 4 of the 1939 Code or Subtitle A or Chapter 11 or 12 of the 1954 Code are within this class, such as: ( i ) Employment taxes.
( ii ) Miscellaneous excise taxes collected by return.
( 3 ) The difference between these two main classes is that only taxes described in subparagraph (1) of this paragraph, i.e., those within the jurisdiction of the Tax Court, may be contested before an independent tribunal prior to payment. Taxes of both classes may be contested by first making payment, filing claim for refund, and then bringing suit to recover if the claim is disallowed or no decision is rendered thereon within six months.
[32 FR 15990, Nov. 22, 1967, as amended at 35 FR 7111, May 6, 1970; 46 FR 26053, May 11, 1981; T.D. 8685, 61 FR 58008, Nov. 12, 1996]
HomeDiplomatic Security Service Memorial...Kassem  Ayache

# 				Kassem  Ayache			

				Local Guard Force			

Deceased				September 20, 1984			

**U.S. Government image**Back to DSS Memorial

Tags

Diplomatic Security Service MemorialLebanon

Back to Top
§ 29.521 Conditions for waiver and other adjustments. ( a ) *General.* Overpayments made from the Retirement Funds will be recovered unless there is substantial evidence that the individual from whom recovery is to be made is eligible for waiver.
( b ) *Waiver.* The Department may waive an overpayment from the Retirement Funds (provided there is no indication of fraud, misrepresentation, or lack of good faith on the part of the debtor) under sections 11021(3) or 11251(c)(2)(B) of the Act when it is established by substantial evidence that the individual from whom recovery is to be made— ( 1 ) Is not at fault in causing or contributing to the overpayment, and
( 2 ) Recovery would be against equity and good conscience.
( c ) *Adjustment in the installment schedule.* ( 1 ) ( i ) An overpayment will not be waived because of financial hardship if a reasonable installment schedule can be established for repayment of the debt by adjusting the installment schedule originally established.
( ii ) For example, if the Department finds that the original installment schedule—24 installments at $125 each—causes the debtor financial hardship, but that repayment in 60 installments at $50 each does not, it may adjust the installments and recover the debt in full.
( 2 ) Where it has been determined that an individual is ineligible for a waiver, but the individual has shown that collection action pursuant to the original installment schedule would cause him or her financial hardship, the Department may— ( i ) Adjust the installment schedule if the individual shows that it would cause him or her financial hardship to make payments at the rate initially scheduled by the Department; or
( ii ) Terminate the collection action under 31 CFR 903.3 if the costs of collecting the debt are anticipated to exceed the amount recoverable.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Integrated Chemical Effects Test Project (NUREG/CR-6914)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Order filed June 10, 2014

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 13

- 01086

- CR DERRICK BROOKS , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 178th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1326207



### ORDER

On June 4, 2014 , this Court issued an order abating the appeal and directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the reason for the failure to file appellant’ s brief. On June 5, 2014, appellant filed a motion to withdraw that order,
as well as his brief and a motion to extend time to file the brief.

The motion s are granted. Our order of June 4, 2014, is withdrawn and t he appeal is reinstated. The State’s brief is due thirty days after the date of this order.

. PER CURI AM
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed July 13, 2016.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D16-518

Lower Tribunal No. 10-26205

________________

Tenet Hialeah Healthsystem, Inc., a Florida corporation, d/b/a

Hialeah Hospital,

Petitioner,

vs.

Yailenis Gonzalez and Dunieski Anzon, as parents of Daniela

Anzon, a deceased minor,

Respondents.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade

County, William Thomas, Judge.

Billing, Cochran, Lyles, Mauro & Ramsey, P.A., and Donna M. Krusbe and

Kenneth W. Morgan, Jr. (West Palm Beach), for petitioner.

Robbins & Reynolds, P.A., and Michael J. Vecchione and Robert A.

Robbins; Carlos O. Fernandez, for respondents.

Before SUAREZ, C.J., and SHEPHERD and SALTER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Tenet Hialeah Healthsystem, Inc., d/b/a Hialeah Hospital, petitions for

certiorari review of orders allowing Yailenis Gonzalez and Dunieski Anzon, as
parents of Daniela Anzon, a deceased minor, to amend their complaint to allege

punitive damages in this action for mishandling of the minor’s corpse. This court

may not review an order authorizing a claim for punitive damages beyond

determining whether the trial court followed the procedural requirements. See

Globe Newspaper Co. v. King, 658 So. 2d 518 (Fla. 1995); Parker, Landeman &

Parker, P.A. v. Riccard, 871 So. 2d 1043 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Delta Health Grp.,

Inc. v. Jackson, 798 So. 2d 857 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Munroe Reg’l Health Sys.,

Inc. v. Estate of Gonzales, 795 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). Accordingly,

because the lower court complied with the procedural requirements in making its

determination in this case, we deny the petition for writ of certiorari.

Petition denied.

2
§ 40.6696-1 Claims for credit or refund by tax return preparers. ( a ) *In general.* The rules under § 1.6696-1 of this chapter will apply for claims for credit or refund by a tax return preparer who prepared a return or claim for refund of any tax to which this part 40 applies.
( b ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section is applicable to returns and claims for refund filed, and advice provided, after December 31, 2008.
[T.D. 9436, 73 FR 78455, Dec. 22, 2008; 74 FR 5106, Jan. 29, 2009]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<CIK>                         0000858800
<NAME>                        EMCLAIRE FINANCIAL CORP.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         6,308
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         305
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    31,288
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         2,273
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           2,264
<LOANS>                                        146,191
<ALLOWANCE>                                    1,354
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 194,585
<DEPOSITS>                                     168,895
<SHORT-TERM>                                   2,420
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            770
<LONG-TERM>                                    2,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,745
<OTHER-SE>                                     18,755
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 194,585
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                2,919
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              544
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               12
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               3,475
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             5,533
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,367
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          2,108
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  46
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                1,711
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                554
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     554
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   163
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.29
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 4.73
<LOANS-NON>                                    609
<LOANS-PAST>                                   84
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               1,373
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  80
<RECOVERIES>                                   15
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              1,354
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           828
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        526



</TABLE>
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Belarus’s Involvement in Russia’s Systematic Relocation of Ukraine’s Children

# 									Belarus’s Involvement in Russia’s Systematic Relocation of Ukraine’s Children							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

November 16, 2023

The Conflict Observatory, a program supported by the U.S. Department of State, today released a report detailing Belarus’s involvement in Russia’s systematic removal of children from Ukraine amid Russia’s illegal and unprovoked war.

According to the Yale Humanitarian Research Lab, a program partner, more than 2,400 children between the ages of six and 17 have been transported from Russia-occupied regions of Ukraine to Dubrava and 12 other facilities in Belarus, where many undergo political and cultural re-education and military training to serve the political interests of Belarus and Russia.  The report concludes that these operations are coordinated at the highest levels of both governments and facilitated by each country’s security forces and ultranationalist militant groups.

The report also finds that officials involved in these relocation operations target children from vulnerable populations, including children with disabilities, children from low-income families, children with military parents, and purported orphans.  These children are relocated to Belarus or Russia, potentially without the consent of their families or a clear path to return home.

These revelations of Belarusian involvement are part of a broader campaign directed by Russia. Members of Russia’s military and government have deported hundreds of thousands of Ukraine’s civilians to Russia, including children who have been forcibly separated from their families.  The United States will continue to pursue accountability for actors involved in abuses connected with Russia’s war against Ukraine.

For more information, see https://hub.conflictobservatory.org/portal/apps/sites/#/home/pages/belarus-children-deportation.

Tags

BelarusBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsChild ProtectionOffice of the SpokespersonRussiaUkraine

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
HomeOffice to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in PersonsRemarks & Releases...About Us – Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons

# About Us – Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons

							Bureau Home							

## 						The U.S. Department of State leads the United States’ global engagement to combat human trafficking and supports the coordination of anti-trafficking efforts across the U.S. government. 					

Within the Department of State, and under the direction of Ambassador-at-Large Cindy Dyer, the Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons (TIP Office) partners with foreign governments, international organizations, other federal agencies, civil society, the private sector, and survivors of human trafficking to develop and implement effective strategies to confront human trafficking. The TIP Office is responsible for bilateral and multilateral diplomacy, targeted foreign assistance, and public engagement on trafficking in persons.

The TIP Office was established in accordance with the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 (TVPA). The TIP Office upholds the “3P” paradigm of prosecuting trafficking cases, protecting victims, and preventing trafficking, consistent with the *United Nations Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime* (Palermo Protocol). The TIP Office is organized into five sections: Reports and Political Affairs, International Programs, Public Engagement, Intergovernmental Affairs, and Resource Management and Planning.

## 					Discover More				

		Reports and Political Affairs		Read more 

		International Programs		Read more 

		Public Engagement		Read more 

		Intergovernmental Affairs		Read more 

		Resource Management and Planning		Read more 

Back to Top
#### § 30.2 Q-2: To what entities does this part apply?

This part applies to any TARP recipient, provided that the requirements of sections 111(b) (portions of § 30.4 (Q-4), § 30.5 (Q-5) and § 30.7 (Q-7), as applicable, § 30.6 (Q-6), and § 30.8 (Q-8) through § 30.11 (Q-11), and § 30.15 (Q-15)), and section 111(e) (§ 30.13 (Q-13)) apply only during the period during which any obligation to the Federal government arising from financial assistance provided under the TARP remains outstanding. For a TARP recipient that has had an obligation to the Federal government arising from financial assistance provided under the TARP, and no further financial assistance under the TARP, the requirements of section 111(c) (including portions of § 30.4 (Q-4), § 30.5 (Q-5) and § 30.7 (Q-7), as applicable) and section 111(d) (§ 30.12 (Q-12)) apply through the last day of the period during which that obligation remains outstanding; for a TARP recipient that has never had an obligation to the Federal government arising from financial assistance provided under the TARP, the requirements of section 111(c) (including portions of § 30.4 (Q-4), § 30.5 (Q-5) and § 30.7 (Q-7), as applicable) and section 111(d) (§ 30.12 (Q-12)) apply through the last day of the TARP recipient's fiscal year including the sunset date. For this purpose, an obligation includes the ownership by the Federal government of common stock of a TARP recipient.

[74 FR 28405, June 15, 2009, as amended at 74 FR 63992, Dec. 7, 2009]
### IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. NOLAN EXCELL PIPPEN

Circuit Court for Marshall County

No. 2014CR12

No. M2015

- 00828

- CCA

- R3

- CD

– Filed January 28, 2016

J OHN E VERETT W ILLIAMS

, J., concurring and dissenting

.

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that the trial court erred by denying the defendant’s motion to suppress. I concur with the majority’s conclusion that the evidence was insufficient to support the defendant’s conviction for public int oxication

as indicted , but I would uphold his conviction for simple possession of marijuana

.

Our supreme court has stated that “the strength of evidence necessary to establish probable cause to arrest is significantly less than the strength of evidence necessary to find a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.” State v. Bishop , 431 S.W.3d 22 , 41 (Tenn. 2014). Both officers testified that the defendant appeared to be intoxicated, smelled of alcohol, and was unsteady on his feet. According to Officer Fender, the defendant was “staggering a little bit” and was “making several steps trying to k eep his balance.” Emotionally, the defendant “seemed to be upset.” Both officers testified that in their opinion, the defendant was intoxicated and therefore a danger to himself and to

others. The defendant also indicated that he had been in an altercat ion involving two

individuals , and he pointed out these individuals in the parking lot. At this point, based upon the available information and their interaction with the defendant, the officers had sufficient probable cause to arrest the defendant for pu blic intoxication. Officers then discovered marijuana in the defendant’s pocket during a search incident to a lawful arrest for public intoxication. Accordingly, I conclude that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s motion to suppress.

_________________________________ JOHN EVERETT WILLIAM S

, JUDGE
i

UNITED STATES BATHYMETRIC MAP DESTIN DOME-GULF OF MEXICO

991 HN SON

($00)

WUREAU OF [AND MANAGEMENT

Hearerenels MincAtoR PRCURCTION
fede 1280000 "

aw oa
ee mreng meme rene bys Nene! cm oe a feo SURVEY HEN commer:
Pferiae aria 7aa hear avers Aptian Pang Da a BEA UATION OF  — OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF RESOURCE MANAGEMENT MAP . = . . } DESTIN DOME
emymes cans wt 1 tars ss a 300 ah gt, soon yf wee i = UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMEACE be TT i] a af “|
—=o om ae = NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION \| a NOS NH 16-8 (OCS)
Leen naleteehactenttaoinaderintatemtatemens 4 NATIONAL OCEAN SURVEY +
meu ~ Gar a 1975 -|
(onc =e = libel so entingin Oi in ed | -
ian senhbarhiccaaniaieyy oS UNITED STATES OEPAKIVENT OF THE nTENCR | —— |
i an]
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2563

To authorize certain operations of Canadian oil spill response and recovery

vessels in waters of the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 31, 1995

Mr. LONGLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To authorize certain operations of Canadian oil spill response

and recovery vessels in waters of the United States.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. USE OF CANADIAN OIL SPILL RESPONSE AND

4 RECOVERY VESSELS.

5 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, oil spill

6 response and recovery vessels documented under the laws

7 of Canada may operate in waters of the United States ad8 jacent to the border between Canada and the United

9 States, on an emergency and temporary basis, for the pur10 pose of recovering, transporting, and unloading in a
2

•HR 2563 IH

1 United States port oil discharged (or that there is a threat

2 will be discharged) in or near such waters, if the Federal

3 On-Scene Coordinator for a discharge or threat of a dis4 charge of oil determines that an adequate number and

5 type of oil spill response and recovery vessels documented

6 under the laws of the United States cannot be engaged

7 to recover oil in or near those waters in a timely manner.

Æ
#### § 525.802 Delegation of certain authorities of the Secretary of the Treasury.

Any action that the Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to take pursuant to Executive Order 14014 of February 10, 2021, and any further Executive orders issued pursuant to the national emergency declared therein, may be taken by the Director of OFAC or by any other person to whom the Secretary of the Treasury has delegated authority so to act.
U. S. Department of Homeland Security 

 Office for Domestic Preparedness

 Washington, D.C. 20531 

ODP Information Bulletin 

No. 109 May 4, 2004

TO: All Interested Parties 

FROM: C. Suzanne Mencer 

 Director

SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2004 Competitive Training Grants Program (CTGP) 

The Office for Domestic Preparedness, United States Department of Homeland Security, is 

pleased to announce the FY2004 Competitive Training Grants Program (CTGP). The grants 

funded by this program will expand ODP’s mission to prepare the nation’s emergency 

responders to prevent, deter, respond to, and recover from incidents of Weapons of Mass 

Destruction terrorism in the United States. 

Enclosed in this packet is the Grant Application Kit with guidance for submitting materials 

through the Grants Management System, as well as the FY2004 CTGP Fact Sheet to assist 

applicants in understanding the process through which applications will be evaluated. 

ODP appreciates your interest in the FY2004 Competitive Training Grants Program and in 

expanding upon existing capacities for training for emergency responders throughout the United 

States. If you have any further questions regarding the grant program, please contact ODP’s 

Centralized Scheduling and Information Desk at 1-800-368-6498.