alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 510.306 Financial, material, or technological support.

The term *financial, material, or technological support,* as used in § 510.201(a), means any property, tangible or intangible, including currency, financial instruments, securities, or any other transmission of value; weapons or related materiel; chemical or biological agents; explosives; false documentation or identification; communications equipment; computers; electronic or other devices or equipment; technologies; lodging; safe houses; facilities; vehicles or other means of transportation; or goods. “Technologies” as used in this definition means specific information necessary for the development, production, or use of a product, including related technical data such as blueprints, plans, diagrams, models, formulae, tables, engineering designs and specifications, manuals, or other recorded instructions.

[83 FR 9187, Mar. 5, 2018, as amended at 85 FR 20162, Apr. 10, 2020]
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

###### Editorial Note on Part 363

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 363 appear at 70 FR 57433, Sept. 30, 2005, 70 FR 57442, Sept. 30, 2005, and 75 FR 70815, Nov. 19, 2010.

#### § 363.207 Can I transfer my marketable Treasury security from my TreasuryDirect ® account to another TreasuryDirect account?

After the initial 45-calendar day holding period for your marketable Treasury security (see § 363.203) you can transfer your security to another TreasuryDirect account in increments of $1000.
# L_2020410EN.01010601.xml

| 7.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 410/106 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 410/106

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision (EU) 2020/1532 of 12 October 2020 on the position to be taken, on behalf of the European Union, in the 66th session of the Harmonized System Committee of the World Customs Organization in relation to the envisaged adoption of Classification Opinions, classification decisions, amendments to the Harmonized System Explanatory Notes or other advice on the interpretation of the Harmonized System, and of recommendations to secure uniformity in the interpretation of the Harmonized System under the Harmonized System Convention

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 406 of 3 December 2020
  )

This corrigendum should be considered null and void.

---
HomeBiographies...James P.  DeHart

# 				James P.  DeHart			

															U.S. Coordinator for the Arctic Region						Office of the U.S. Coordinator for the Arctic Region												

				July 27, 2020 -									Present							

Tags

Office of the U.S. Coordinator for the Arctic RegionState Department Official

Back to Top
§ 515.509 Entries in certain accounts for normal service charges. ( a ) Any banking institution within the United States is hereby authorized to: ( 1 ) Debit any blocked account with such banking institution (or with another office within the United States of such banking institution) in payment or reimbursement for normal service charges owed to such banking institution by the owner of such blocked account.
( 2 ) Make book entries against any foreign currency account maintained by it with a banking institution in a designated foreign country for the purpose of responding to debits to such account for normal service charges in connection therewith.
( b ) As used in this section, the term *normal service charge* shall include charges in payment or reimbursement for interest due; cable, telegraph, or telephone charges; postage costs; custody fees; small adjustment charges to correct bookkeeping errors; and, but not by way of limitation, minimum balance charges, account carrying charges, notary and protest fees, and charges for reference books, photostats, credit reports, transcripts of statements, registered mail insurance, stationery and supplies, check books, and other similar items.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Antigua and Barbuda Independence Day

# 									Antigua and Barbuda Independence Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

November 1, 2021

On behalf of the government of the United States and the American people, I congratulate the people of Antigua and Barbuda on the 40th anniversary of your independence.

The United States values the partnership of Antigua and Barbuda to create a healthier, safer, and more prosperous Caribbean.  Our work together to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic delivered personal protective equipment to frontline workers, procured equipment for COVID-19 detection and patient monitoring, and facilitated the provision of tens of thousands of vaccines by the U.S. government to the people of Antigua and Barbuda.  Our juvenile justice and crime prevention programs continue to build safer communities.  We are proud that U.S. technology and innovation support power generation in Antigua and Barbuda and a path to reducing carbon emissions.

Confident in our friendship and our shared democratic values, I wish the people of Antigua and Barbuda a happy Independence Day.

Tags

Antigua and BarbudaBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Belgium’s National Day

# 									Belgium’s National Day							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

July 21, 2023

On behalf of the Government of the United States of America, I send my warm wishes to the people of the Kingdom of Belgium as you celebrate your National Day.

Our deep friendship with Belgium is based on our common values and strong commitment to democracy.  We have stood shoulder to shoulder in shared sacrifice during two world wars.  As founding members of NATO, we established a cornerstone of peace, prosperity, and stability, which the Transatlantic community has enjoyed for more than 70 years.  Our close cooperation in response to Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine has deepened our bilateral ties.

Our strong trade and investment relationship has continued to flourish on both sides of the Atlantic, including through the U.S.-EU partnership; we look forward to Belgium’s January – June 2024 presidency of the Council of the European Union.  We recognize Belgium’s support of resilient pharmaceutical supply chains, expertise in the clean energy transition and semiconductors, and increased commitment to defense investments and efforts to counter terrorism.  Our common commitment to human rights, equity, diversity, and the environment makes us natural partners.

We are a proud partner of Belgium on a broad range of issues that are important to our people, and we have a shared commitment to creating opportunities for our joint security and prosperity.  I look forward to our continued collaboration in the coming year to create a more secure and prosperous future for our citizens.  Best wishes to the people of Belgium on the occasion of your National Day.

Tags

BelgiumBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
C

# (~ FORT WAYNE-ALLEN COUNTY 

### AIRPORT AUTHORITY FORTWAYNE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT .//''''-' SMITH FiElD AIRPORT

.,

# ~lb'~ 

# ............ February 24,2010 The Honorable Raymond H. LaHood Secretary U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey AvW SE
. Washington, DC 20590 Docket DOT-OST-201 0-'" Dear Mr. Secretary: Thankyou for the opportunity to express our support for the application for antitrust immunity and proposedjointbusiness agreement filed by American Airlines and Japan Airlines. The proposed alliance between these two airlines is vital for the oneworld alliance to compete effectively with the Star and SkyTeam alliances. This increased alliance competition will in tum enhance the benefits ofthe Department's Open Skies policy**~first** by solidifying U.S.**~** Japan Open Skies, then by serving as a foundation for further liberalization across Asia. After athorough review, we encourage the Department ofTransportation to approve this application as itwould enable these oneworld alliance airlines to work closely together to deliver highly competitive airtransportation services. Approval for AAIJAL alliance will have a positive impact on airtravel to Fort Wayne, Indiana residents and visitors by offering customers more service, scheduling and pricing options, and will help to ensure that customers continue to benefit from the competition afforded by three competitive air alliances. We respectfully urge you to quickly approve this application.

Torrance A. Richardson, A.A.E. Executive Director ofAirports Fort Wayne-Allen County Airpo,rt Authority

3801 W. Ferguson Rd"Ste. 209 • Fort Wayne, ,iN 46\lO9-3194 • Ph:26()'747c4146 • Fox:260-747-1762 • Web:www./wgirport.com
IB

House Calendar No. 157

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2481

[Report No. 104–414]

To designate the Federal Triangle Project under construction at 14th Street

and Pennsylvania Avenue Northwest, in the District of Columbia, as

the ‘‘Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 13, 1995

Mrs. SEASTRAND (for herself, Mr. GILCHREST, Mr. COX of California, Ms.

DUNN of Washington, Mr. DAVIS, Mr. SAXTON, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Mr.

OXLEY, Mr. DORNAN, Mr. HOKE, Mr. TIAHRT, Mr. BARTON of Texas,

Mr. WALKER, Mr. BAKER of California, Mr. LEWIS of California, Mr.

ROHRABACHER, Mrs. KELLY, Mr. KIM, Mr. HALL of Texas, Mr. LIVINGSTON, Mr. TAYLOR of North Carolina, Mr. MCKEON, Mr. BILBRAY, Mr.

KING, Mr. HERGER, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. BARRETT of Nebraska, Mr.

YOUNG of Alaska, Mr. LAUGHLIN, Mr. KNOLLENBERG, Mr. MOORHEAD,

Mr. HASTERT, Mr. COOLEY, Mr. RADANOVICH, Mrs. CHENOWETH, Mrs.

CUBIN, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. HUNTER, Mr. HORN, and Mr. RIGGS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

DECEMBER 18 (legislative day, DECEMBER 15), 1995

Additional sponsors: Mr. PACKARD, Mr. LIPINSKI, and Mr. MARTINI

DECEMBER 18 (legislative day, DECEMBER 15), 1995

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To designate the Federal Triangle Project under construction

at 14th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue Northwest, in
2

•HR 2481 RH

the District of Columbia, as the ‘‘Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Federal Triangle Project under construction at

5 14th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, Northwest, in the

6 District of Columbia, shall be known and designated as

7 the ‘‘Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade

8 Center’’.

9 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

10 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

11 paper, or other record of the United States to the building

12 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

13 to the ‘‘Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade

14 Center’’.

House Calendar No. 157

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2481

[Report No. 104–414]

A BILL

To designate the Federal Triangle Project under

D

Trade Center’’.the ‘‘Ronald Reagan Building and Internationalenue Northwest, in the District of Columbia, asconstruction at 14th Street and Pennsylvania AvECEMBER 18 (legislative day, DECEMBER 15), 1995

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 359.67 Does Fiscal Service prohibit the issuance of Series I savings bonds in a chain letter scheme?

We do not permit bonds to be issued in a chain letter or pyramid scheme. We authorize an issuing agent to refuse to issue a bond or accept a purchase order if there is reason to believe that a purchase is connected with a chain letter. The agent's decision is final.
www.gpo.gov

### §187. Omitted

#### Codification

Section, R.S. §2121, which directed the Superintendent of Indian Affairs to suspend a trespasser (as described in section 186 of this title) who is the chief or headman of a band or tribe from his office for 3 months and to deprive him of all benefits and emoluments of such office during that time but allowed the Superintendent to restore him to his office sooner if the Superintendent should so decide, was omitted in view of the repeal of section 186 of this title.
EX-10.17



 Exhibit 10.17 

 

			
		  	 AMENDMENT NO. 3, dated as of October 27, 2006, to that Employment Agreement dated October 22, 2004 (the “Agreement”) by and
between John Swider (the “Executive”) and AMERICAN MEDIA OPERATIONS, INC. (the “Company”).


 Effective as of the date first written above, the Agreement is hereby amended as follows: 

1. Paragraph 2b of the Agreement, as amended, is hereby deleted and the following substituted therefore: 

During the Contract Term, Executive will devote Executive’s full business time and best efforts to the performance of
Executive’s duties hereunder and will not engage in any other business, profession or occupation for compensation which would conflict with the rendition of such services either directly or indirectly, without the prior consent of the
Company’s Chief Executive Officer; provided that, Executive may be an officer/managing member of a company/LLC which is involved in the horse/horse racing industry, so long as such activities do not materially interfere with the performance of
Executive’s duties hereunder. 
 All other terms and conditions of Executive’s Employment Agreement and any subsequent
amendments of that Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have
duly executed this Amendment No. 3 as of the date first written above. 
  

					
	AMERICAN MEDIA OPERATIONS, INC.	 	
			
	 By:
	 	/s/ David Rotstein	 	10/30/06
		 		 	Date


 
			
		
	/s/ John Swider	 	10/27/06
	John Swider	 	Date
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Oscar Urena, Appellant.

[806 NYS2d 611]

Appeal by the defen*588dant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Starkey, J.), rendered November 26, 2002, convicting him of murder in the second degree, attempted murder in the second degree (three counts), robbery in the first degree, attempted robbery in the first degree (two counts), robbery in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The majority of the defendant’s contentions, related to the prosecution’s elicitation of testimony from a police witness which allegedly improperly bolstered the identifications of him by two civilian prosecution witnesses, are unpreserved for appellate review as they were not raised before the trial court (see *People v Malizia,*62 NY2d 755 [1984], *cert denied*469 US 932 [1984]; *People v Martinez,*1 AD3d 611 [2003]; *People v Stephens,*274 AD2d 487 [2000]). In any event, any error was harmless in light of the overwhelming proof of guilt (see *People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230 [1975]).

The defendant also contends that he was denied the effective assistance of trial counsel. However, to prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show that the defense counsel failed to provide meaningful representation *(see People v Henry,*95 NY2d 563, 565 [2000]; *People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137 [1981]; *People v Myers,*220 AD2d 461 [1995]). After a review of the record in its entirety and without giving undue significance to retrospective analysis, we are satisfied that the defendant received the effective assistance of trial counsel *(id.).*Adams, J.P., S. Miller, Ritter and Lifson, JJ, concur.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Assistant Secretary of State Satterfield to Travel to the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan

# 									Assistant Secretary of State Satterfield to Travel to the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

May 16, 2023

Assistant Secretary of State for Educational and Cultural Affairs Lee Satterfield will travel to Jordan from May 17-20, 2023. While in Jordan, Assistant Secretary Satterfield will advance key bilateral U.S.-Jordan public diplomacy efforts— such as promoting inclusive economic growth and education and exchange opportunities. She will also highlight the importance of cultural diplomacy as a key component of the creative economy, as well as cultural heritage protection and preservation, which is critical to Jordan’s tourism sector. In addition, the Assistant Secretary will participate in discussions on expanding access to economic and educational opportunities for women and girls through science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM).

Assistant Secretary Satterfield will also deliver remarks at the celebration of the 30th anniversary of the Jordanian-American Commission for Educational Exchange (JACEE), which administers the Fulbright Program with Jordan. In addition, she will participate in bilateral meetings with senior government officials; visit Ambassador’s Fund for Cultural  Preservation projects; and meet with American and Jordanian exchange participants and program alumni.

For further information, contact ECA-Press@state.gov. Follow along on Twitter at @ECA_AS.

Tags

Bureau of Educational and Cultural AffairsBureau of Near Eastern AffairsCultural PropertiesDiplomacyEconomic AffairsEducationJordanOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial International Travel

Back to Top
40037.

#### KEITH v. STREICHER MANUFACTURING COMPANY.

Decided June 25, 1963

Rehearing denied July 11, 1963.

*Oze B. Horton,*for plaintiff in error.

*Lvpshutz, Macey, Zusmann <& Sikes, John M. Sikes, Jr., Bobert A. Eisner,*contra.

Frankum, Judge.

1. Where plaintiff’s original petition alleged that the defendant was indebted to the plaintiff in the amount of $338.50, as shown by reference to a bill of particulars attached, and where the bill of particulars referred to five notes aggregating the sum sued for, and where the notes were not themselves attached to the petition, and where the defendant demurred to the original petition and to the exhibit on the ground that there was nowhere therein set out “copies of the notes upon which the action is based and which are written instruments, and he prays . . . that the plaintiff be required to attach copies of such notes to the petition as exhibits or the petition be dismissed,” and where thereafter the plaintiff amended the petition to meet this demurrer and attached copies of the promissory notes sued on, the court did not err in allowing the amendment over the objection that the amendment set forth a new and distinct cause of action.

2. The defendant’s unsworn answer merely denied the allegations of the plaintiff’s petition with respect to the indebtedness sued upon. This did not constitute an issuable defense to the suit upon promissory notes. *Bowden v. Davison-Paxon Co.,*71 Ga. App. 379, 382 (2) (31 SE2d 83); *Johnson v. Cobb,*100 Ga. 139 (28 SE 72); *Pyron v. Ruohs,*120 Ga. 1060, 1065 (5) (48 SE 434). No issuable defense having been filed, the trial judge did not err in rendering judgment for the plaintiff in the amount sued for. *Code Ann.*§ 110-406.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.*
§ 515.333 Depository institution. The term *depository institution* means any of the following: ( a ) An insured bank as defined in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act;
( b ) An insured institution as defined in section 408(a) of the National Housing Act;
( c ) An insured credit union as defined in section 101 of the Federal Credit Union Act; or
( d ) Any other institution that is carrying on banking activities pursuant to a charter from a Federal or state banking authority.
[57 FR 53997, Nov. 16, 1992]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Hector Rosario, Appellant.

[803 NYS2d 910]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William A. Wetzel, J.), rendered on or about October 24, 2003, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (see *Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Marlow, Ellerin, Gonzalez and McGuire, JJ.
8884 Rossman Hwy 

Dimondale, MI 48821 

February 8, 2012 

Docket Management Facility 

U.S. Dept. of Transportation 

Docket No. FAA-2012-0089 

1200 New Jersey Ave. SE 

West Building Grand Floor 

RoomW-=120140 

Washington DC 20590 L.vJ rSO O 

To tlie Department of Transportation authorities: 

This letter is heiog sent to urge you to support Sun Country 

Airline's appeal to keep flyiog from Lansing to Washington, D. C. 

Please authorize an additional slot under an exemption rule. 

This action would greatly benefit our efforts to improve the 

economic development of greater Lansing and the central 

Michigan area. The airline has been a welcome carrier for our 

airport and has established an excellent record of safety and 

service since last Aprtl. 

Thank you for your attention! 

Sincerely, 

'v ,^1 ^ 

James and Sherrill Zehnder
§ 401.4 Duties of Bureau of Customs. With respect to every vessel, vehicle, and aircraft seized and placed in the custody of a district director of customs pursuant to the said act of August 9, 1939, and the regulations in this part, the appropriate officials of the Bureau of Customs are hereby authorized and designated as the officers who shall perform such administrative duties in connection with— ( a ) The summary and judicial forfeiture and condemnation of such vessel, vehicle, or aircraft;
( b ) The disposition of such vessel, vehicle, or aircraft or the proceeds from the sale thereof;
( c ) The remission or mitigation of the forfeiture of such vessel, vehicle, or aircraft; and
( d ) The compromise of claims and the award of compensation to informers in respect to such vessel, vehicle, or aircraft;
as may be necessary and proper by virtue of the provisions of said act of August 9, 1939, and by virtue of the provisions of the customs laws which the said act makes applicable in connection with seizures and forfeitures incurred or alleged to have been incurred under the said act and the regulations in this part. In the performance of said administrative duties the said appropriate officials of the Bureau of Customs shall be governed by the procedures established by the customs regulations, insofar as such procedures are applicable and not inconsistent with the provisions of the said act of August 9, 1939, and the regulations in this part. Powers of the character of those exercised by the Secretary of the Treasury and Commissioner of Customs is connection with the remission or mitigation of forfeitures under the customs laws and in connection with the compromise of claims and the award of compensation to informers under the customs laws shall be exercised by the Secretary of the Treasury in connection with the remission or mitigation of forfeitures under the said act of August 9, 1939, and in connection with the compromise of claims and the award of compensation to informers under the said act.