alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE of Arkansas *v.*Murray ARMSTRONG

97-1565

960 S.W.2d 451

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered January 29, 1998

*Winston Bryant,*Att’y Gen., by: O. *Milton Fine II,*Asst. Att’y Gen., for appellant.

*Sam Heuer,*for appellee.

Per Curiam.

The State has filed a motion for clarification inquiring about the presiding trial judge in a petition for writ of habeas corpus, Case No. LCIV 97-98-3, filed by appellee Murray Armstrong in Lincoln County Circuit Court on October 8, 1997.

Appellee had been previously charged by felony information in Lincoln County Circuit Court with multiple counts of theft of property in Case Nos. LCR 96-6-1, LCR 96-17-1, and LCR 96-18-1. After all of the circuit judges in the Eleventh Judicial District recused from these cases, the Chief Justice, pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 16-10-101 (b) (1987), assigned the Hon. John Cole of the Seventh Judicial Circuit to hear the cases. The assignment order, No. 97-035, was entered on January 31, 1997.

When appellee filed the petition for writ of habeas corpus at issue, the case was assigned to the Third Division of Lincoln County Circuit Court. This case, No. LCIV 97-98-3, was then merely forwarded to Judge Cole pursuant to Assignment Order No. 97-035.

*295The State now asks us to clarify whether Assignment Order 97-035 covers the adjudication of appellee’s habeas corpus petition. If the there is a recusal by all of the circuit judges in the Eleventh Judicial District, we will follow the procedure as set forth in Ark. Code Ann. § 16-10-101 (b) (1987), whereby the Chief Justice will assign a special judge to hear LCIV 97-98-3.

Motion granted.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 315.75 Payment or reissue during the existence of the fiduciary estate. ( a ) *Payment or reissue before maturity* — ( 1 ) *Request from the fiduciary named in the registration.* A request for reissue or payment prior to maturity must be signed by all of the fiduciaries unless by statute, decree of court, or the terms of the governing instrument, any lesser number may properly execute the request. If the fiduciaries named in the registration are still acting, no further evidence will be required. In other cases, evidence to support the request will be required, as specified: ( i ) *Fiduciaries by title only.* If the bond is registered only in the titles, without the names, of fiduciaries not acting as a board, satisfactory evidence of their incumbency must be furnished, except in the case of bonds registered in the title of public officers as trustees.
( ii ) *Boards, committees, commissions, etc.* If a bond is registered in the name of a governing body which is empowered to act as a unit, and which holds title to the property of a religious, educational, charitable or nonprofit organization or a public corporation, the request should be signed in the name of the body by an authorized person. Ordinarily, a signed and certified request will be accepted without further evidence.
( iii ) *Corporate fiduciaries.* If a bond is registered in the name of a public or private corporation or a governmental body as fiduciary, the request must be signed by an authorized officer in the name of the organization as fiduciary. Ordinarily, a signed and certified request will be accepted without further evidence.
( 2 ) *Trustee of a common trust fund.* A bond held by a financial institution in a fiduciary capacity may be reissued in the name of the institution as trustee of its common trust fund to the extent that participation in the common trust fund is authorized by law or regulation. The request for reissue should be executed by the institution and any cofiduciary.
( 3 ) *Successor fiduciary.* If the fiduciary in whose name the bond is registered has been replaced by another fiduciary, satisfactory evidence of successorship must be furnished.
( b ) *Payment at or after final maturity.* At or after final maturity, a request for payment signed by any one or more of the fiduciaries will be accepted. Payment will be made by check drawn as the bond is registered.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 253

To amend the Act commonly referred to as the ‘‘Johnson Act’’ to limit

the authority of States to regulate gambling devices on vessels.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Ms. HARMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To amend the Act commonly referred to as the ‘‘Johnson

Act’’ to limit the authority of States to regulate gambling

devices on vessels.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AUTHORITY OF STATES TO

4 REGULATE GAMBLING DEVICES ON VESSELS.

5 Section 5(b)(2) of the Act of January 2, 1951 (15

6 U.S.C. 1175(b)(2)), commonly referred to as the ‘‘John7 son Act’’, is amended by adding at the end the following:

8 ‘‘(C) EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN VOYAGES

9 AND SEGMENTS.—Except for a voyage or seg10 ment of a voyage that occurs within the bound-
2

•HR 253 IH

1 aries of the State of Hawaii, a voyage or seg2 ment of a voyage is not described in subpara3 graph (B) if it includes or consists of a seg4 ment—

5 ‘‘(i) that begins and ends in the same

6 State;

7 ‘‘(ii) that is part of a voyage to an8 other State or to a foreign country; and

9 ‘‘(iii) in which the vessel reaches the

10 other State or foreign country within 3

11 days after leaving the State in which it

12 begins.’’.

Æ
# Journal officiel C 30A/2012

| | ISSN 1977-0936
  doi:10.3000/19770936.CA2012.030.fre |
| --- | --- |
| Journal officiel
  de l'Union européenne | C 30A |
| | |
| Édition de langue française | Communications et informations | 55e année3 février 2012 |

ISSN 1977-0936

doi:10.3000/19770936.CA2012.030.fre

Journal officiel

de l'Union européenne

C 30A

Édition de langue française

Communications et informations

55e année3 février 2012

---

| Numéro d'information | Sommaire | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Avis |
| | PROCÉDURES ADMINISTRATIVES |
| 2012/C 030A/01 | Liste de réserve — Concours général EPSO/AD/202/10 — Juristes de formation juridique française (AD 5) | 1 |

Numéro d'information

Sommaire

page

V   Avis

PROCÉDURES ADMINISTRATIVES

2012/C 030A/01

Liste de réserve — Concours général EPSO/AD/202/10 — Juristes de formation juridique française (AD 5)

1

HISTORIQUE DES JOURNAUX OFFICIELS, SÉRIE A CONCOURS

Vous trouverez ci-dessous la liste des JO C A publiés dans l'année en cours.

Sauf indication contraire, les Journaux officiels sont publiés dans toutes les versions linguistiques.

| 8 | (DA/EL/HU/IT/MT/PL) |
| --- | --- |
| 10 | |
| 17 | (LT) |
| 20 | (EN) |
| 22 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (FR) |

8

(DA/EL/HU/IT/MT/PL)

10

17

(LT)

20

(EN)

22

(DE/EN/FR)

27

30

(FR)

| FR | |
| --- | --- |

FR

---

V Avis

PROCÉDURES ADMINISTRATIVES

| 3.2.2012 | FR | Journal officiel de l'Union européenne | CA 30/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2012

FR

Journal officiel de l'Union européenne

CA 30/1

---

LISTE DE RÉSERVE (1)

CONCOURS GÉNÉRAL EPSO/AD/202/10

JURISTES DE FORMATION JURIDIQUE FRANÇAISE (AD 5)

(2012/C 30 A/01)

| CHANTRE | Stéphanie |
| --- | --- |
| MEYER | Raphaël |
| SIMONETTI | Florence |

CHANTRE

Stéphanie

MEYER

Raphaël

SIMONETTI

Florence

La validité de la liste expirera le 12 janvier 2015.

---

(1)  À la demande expresse d'un lauréat, son nom n'est pas publié.

---
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6040** 

CASEY RAFAEL TYLER , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

CARLTON B. JOYNER; MARSHALL PIKE; FREDERICK STRICKLAND; ANNETTE JONES; CATHY JUDGE; TALENA LEE; RYAN SMITH; ABRAHAM MONK; DENNIS ROWLAND; KEITH GRANDERSON; KATHERINE MITCHELL , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 5:14

- ct

- 03044

- BO )

Submitted : June 29, 2015 Decided: July 31, 2015

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Casey Rafael Tyler, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Casey Rafael Tyler appeals the district court ’ s order s dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (20 12 ) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (20 12 ) and denying his motion to alter or amend
under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) . We have reviewed th e record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Tyler v.
Joyner , No. 5:14

- ct

- 03044

- BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 1, 2014) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

c ontentions are adequately presented in the materials before

th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 161 (Friday, August 21, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 42233]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20097]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XR02


New England Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of a public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The New England Fishery Management Council (Council) is 
scheduling a joint public meeting of its Whiting Committee and Advisory 
Panel in September, 2009 to consider actions affecting New England 
fisheries in the exclusive economic zone (EEZ). Recommendations from 
this group will be brought to the full Council for formal consideration 
and action, if appropriate.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Monday, September 14, 2009 at 10 
a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Holiday Inn, 31 Hampshire 
Street, Mansfield, MA 02048: telephone: (508) 339-2200; fax: (508) 339-
1040.
    Council address: New England Fishery Management Council, 50 Water 
Street, Mill 2, Newburyport, MA 01950.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul J. Howard, Executive Director, 
New England Fishery Management Council; telephone: (978) 465-0492.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Oversight Committee and Advisory Panel 
will begin developing draft alternatives for Amendment 17, which would 
revise regulations for small mesh groundfish (whiting and red hake). 
Included in the amendment will be alternatives for annual catch limits 
(ACLs) and accountability measures (AMs), limited access, catch 
allocations, and possibly measures to minimize bycatch. A report from 
the Whiting PDT will be given. Other related issues may be discussed.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained in this agenda may come 
before this group for discussion, those issues may not be the subject 
of formal action during this meeting. Action will be restricted to 
those issues specifically listed in this notice and any issues arising 
after publication of this notice that require emergency action under 
section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, provided the public has 
been notified of the Council's intent to take final action to address 
the emergency.

Special Accommodations

    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Paul J. Howard, Executive Director, at (978) 465-
0492, at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.

    Authority:  16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: August 18, 2009.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E9-20097 Filed 8-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
EXHIBIT 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of JACOBS  FINANCIAL  GROUP,  INC. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended  November 30, 2008 (the  "Report")
filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission,  I, John M. Jacobs,  Chief
Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Company's  Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



Date: January 20, 2009


                                /s/John M. Jacobs
                                ----------------------------------------
                                John M. Jacobs,  Chief Executive Officer
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Assistant Secretary Witkowsky’s Travel to the United Kingdom

# 									Assistant Secretary Witkowsky’s Travel to the United Kingdom							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

February 9, 2024

Assistant Secretary of State for Conflict and Stabilization Operations Anne A. Witkowsky will travel to the United Kingdom February 11-14 for a dialogue on approaches to conflict resolution hosted by the Foreign, Commonwealth, & Development Office.

Assistant Secretary Witkowsky will represent the United States at Wilton Park and participate in multilateral discussions on enhancing collaboration among state actors, multilateral organizations, and the peacebuilding NGO community.  She will chair a panel on adapting future conflict resolution efforts to shifting geopolitics and emerging technology.

While in the United Kingdom, Assistant Secretary Witkowsky will also meet with multilateral and non-governmental organizations on conflict prevention and mediation initiatives worldwide, including efforts under the U.S. Strategy to Prevent Conflict and Promote Stability.

For more information, follow @StateCSO on X or contact CSO at CSOPublicAffairs1@state.gov.

Tags

Bureau of Conflict and Stabilization OperationsBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonTravelUnited Kingdom

Back to Top
www.gpo.gov

### §312. Rights-of-way for railway, telegraph, and telephone lines; town-site stations

A right of way for a railway, telegraph, and telephone line through any Indian reservation in any State or Territory, except Oklahoma, or through any lands reserved for an Indian agency or for other purposes in connection with the Indian service, or through any lands which have been allotted in severalty to any individual Indian under any law or treaty, but which have not been conveyed to the allottee with full power of alienation, is granted to any railroad company organized under the laws of the United States, or of any State or Territory, which shall comply with the provisions of sections 312 to 318 of this title and such rules and regulations as may be prescribed thereunder: *Provided*, That no right of way shall be granted under said sections until the Secretary of the Interior is satisfied that the company applying has made said application in good faith and with intent and ability to construct said road, and in case objection to the granting of such right of way shall be made, said Secretary shall afford the parties so objecting a full opportunity to be heard: *Provided further*, That where a railroad has heretofore been constructed, or is in actual course of construction, no parallel right of way within ten miles on either side shall be granted by the Secretary of the Interior unless, in his opinion, public interest will be promoted thereby: *Provided, also*, That as a condition precedent to each and every grant of a right of way under authority of said sections, each and every railway company applying for such grant shall stipulate that it will construct and permanently maintain suitable passenger and freight stations for the convenience of each and every town site established by the Government along said right of way.

(Mar. 2, 1899, ch. 374, §1, 30 Stat. 990; Feb. 28, 1902, ch. 134, §23, 32 Stat. 50; June 25, 1910, ch. 431, §16, 36 Stat. 859.)

#### Cross References

Acquisition of lands for reservoirs or materials, see section 320 of this title.

Pueblo Indians of New Mexico, application of section, see section 322 of this title.

Rights of way for—

Pipelines, see section 321 of this title.

Telephone and telegraph lines, see section 319 of this title.

#### Section Referred to in Other Sections

This section is referred to in sections 314, 316, 317, 318, 322, 353, 406, 564h, 697, 747, 797, 843 of this title.
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appea **ls**

**San Antonio, Texas**

July 22, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00315

- CR

Paulino FLORES

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR1058

Honorable George H. Godwin, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The court reporter’s second request for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record is

GRANTED. The reporter’s record is due on August 18, 2014

. No further extensions will be

granted.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the sai d

court on this 22nd day of July, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
§ 34.603 Limitations on activities—NOAA RESTORE Act Science Program. None of the Trust Fund amounts may be used for the following activities: ( a ) For any existing or planned research led by NOAA, unless agreed to in writing by the grant recipient.
( b ) To implement existing regulations or initiate new regulations promulgated or proposed by NOAA.
( c ) To develop or approve a new limited access privilege program (as that term is used in section 303A of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act [16 U.S.C. 1853(a)]) for any fishery under the jurisdiction of the South Atlantic, Mid-Atlantic, New England, or Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Councils.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Terry LITTLE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-6917.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 11, 2002.

Decided June 21, 2002.

James Terry Little, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller, Office of the United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina; David Bernard Smith, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

James Terry Little seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on the reasoning of the district court. *See San Miguel v. Dove,*291 F.3d 257 (4th *698Cir.2002). Although we grant leave to file a supplemental brief, we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 347.36 Maturity.

The maturity date for retirement savings bonds is indeterminate and may be different for each bond issued, but shall not exceed the sum of an original maturity period of 20 years and an extended maturity period of 10 years. A retirement savings bond purchased by the Auto-IRA custodian on behalf of a participant will mature at the earlier of 30 years from the date the bond is first issued to the custodian on behalf of the participant or when its value reaches $15,000.
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 15

- 00410

- CV

CAROLINE H. MARTINEZ , INDIVIDUALLY AND TRUSTEE OF THE C AROLINE H. MARTINEZ REVOCABLE L IVING TRUST , Appellant s

v.

ROBERT MARTINEZ , Appellee

From the 170th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2014

- 1202

- 4

ORDER

On March 3, 2016, counsel for Appellee Robert Martinez filed a motion to dismiss

that has been carried with the appeal

. Th e appeal has not yet been decided.
On February 28, 2017, we received a pro se letter from Robert Martinez requesting

that the motio n to dismiss be reviewed and that the case be dismissed “without delay.”

O n March 3, 2017, we then received a second pro se letter from Robert Martinez requestingMartinez v. Martinez Page 2

a “change in venue” in part “due to the excessive time this Court has taken to respond to

the Motion to Dismiss.”
Only the Texas Supreme Court has the authority to transfer an appeal from one

court of appeals district to another. Miles v. Fo rd Motor Co. , 914 S.W.2d 135, 137 (Tex.
1995) (“Only the Supreme Court is authorized to transfer appellate cases.”); see T EX

. G OV ’ T

C ODE A NN

. § 73.001 (West 2013 ). Furthermore, Robert Martinez is represented by

counsel. And a party is entitled to represe nt himself or to be represented by an attorney,
but he is not entitled to representation partly by counsel and partly pro se

. Posner v. Dallas
County Child Welfare Unit of Tex. Dep’t of Human Servs. , 784 S.W.2d 585, 588 (Tex. App.

—
Eastland 1990, writ deni ed).
Accordingly, we dismiss Robert Martinez’s pro se requests.

PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis , and Justice Scoggins Order issued and filed March 22, 2017 Do not publish
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Assistant Secretary of State for International Organization Affairs Sison’s Travel to Qatar

# 									Assistant Secretary of State for International Organization Affairs Sison’s Travel to Qatar							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

March 4, 2023

Assistant Secretary of State for International Organization Affairs Michele Sison will travel to Doha, Qatar, March 5-7, 2023, for a series of meetings with delegates to the 5th United Nations Conference on the Least Developed Countries (LDC5). Assistant Secretary Sison will underscore U.S. support for LDCs in their efforts to advance the UN Sustainable Development Goals and implement the 10-year LDC5 Doha Program of Action. The Assistant Secretary will also participate in discussions regarding current and potential partnerships to mitigate the effects of climate change, recover from the pandemic and build resilience against future shocks, and leverage science, technology, and innovation for sustainable development. Assistant Secretary Sison will also advocate for the U.S. candidate for Director General of the International Organization for Migration, Amy Pope.

For updates, follow @State_IO on Twitter.

Tags

Bureau of Near Eastern AffairsClimate ChangeOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial International TravelPartnershipsQatarScienceSustainable DevelopmentTechnology

Back to Top