T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T R AF AE L R OA - F I GU E R OA , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 73316 A ge nc yN o. A 073- 806- 103 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d June 26, 2012 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , H A W K IN S , an dG O U L D , C i rcu i tJu d g es. R a f a e l R oa - F i gue r oa , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l fr om an im m ig r a tio n ju d g e ’s d e c is io n d e n y in g h is ap p lic a tio n f o rc an c e lla tio n o f

r e m o v a l. We h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r8 U. S . C . § 1 2 5 2 . We r e v i e w d e n o v o q u e s t i o n s o f l a w, 

# FI LED JU L 02 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 73316 2 V asqu ezde A lcantar v. H older , 64 5 F . 3d 10 97 , 10 99 (9th C i r. 20 11 ), and revi ew fo r su b st an t i al ev i d en ce th e ag en cy’ s factu al fi n d i n g s, L o p ez -A lv a ra do v . A s h c r o ft , 3 8 1 F . 3 d8 4 7 , 8 5 0 - 5 1 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 4 ) . We d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T he a ge nc ypr ope r l yc onc l ude d tha tR oa - F i gue r oaw a s i ne l i gi bl e f or c a nc e l l a t i on of

r e m ova l be c aus e he f

a i l e d t o m e e tthe s e ve n- y e a rc ont i nuous p h y s ic a l p r e s e n c e r e q u ir e m e n t. See 8 U . S . C . § 1 22 9b (a )( 2), (d)( 1) (r equi ri ng se ven y e a r s of c ont i nuous r e s i de nc e a f t e rha vi ng be e n “ a dm i tt e d i n a nys t a tus ” a nd st op pi ng ac crual up on se rvi ce of a N ot i ce t o A pp ear ( “N T A ”) ). S ub st ant i alevi dence s up po rt s the agency’ s f i nd i ng thatR oa-F i gu er oa w as p r o p e r lys e rv e dw ith h is N T A w h e r e th e s ig n e dc e rtif ic a te o f s e rv ic e in d ic a te s it w a s p e r s o n a llys e rv e do n h im . See 8 C . F . R . § 1003. 13; Koh l iv. G on zales , 473 F . 3d 1061, 1068 ( 9th C i r . 2007) ( appl y i ng apr e s um pt i on of r e gul a r i tyr e ga r di ng the offi ci alac t s of pub l i c off i ce rs ). R oa-F i gu er oa’ s c on t ent i on thathi s N T A w as i nva l i d be c aus e i tdi d nots pe c i f ythe t i m e a nd pl a c e of

hi s i ni t i a l r e m ova l he a r i ng i s fo recl o sedb y P op a v. H older , 57 1 F . 3d 89 0, 89 5-96 (9th C i r. 20 09 ). N e i the rR oa - F i gue r oa ’ s f i l i ng of a n appl i c a t i on f

orl e ga l pe rm a ne nt resi d en ce n o r h i s recei p to f ad v an cedp aro l e co n st i tu t e ad m i ssi o n “ i n an y st atu s” f o rp u rp o s e s o f

c a n c e lla tio n o f

r e m o v a l. See V

as quezde A lc antar , 64 5 F . 3d at 11 03 (m er e f

i l i ng for l egalperm anentre si dence s t atus do es no tconst i tut e an08- 73316 3 a d m is s io n “in a n ys ta tu s ” ) ; A l tam i rano v. G on zales , 4 2 7 F .3 d5 8 6 , 5 9 0 - 9 1 & n .4 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) ( ap a r o le e h a s n e ith e rb e e n a d m itte dn o rm a d e alaw f u l e n tryin to the U ni t ed S t at es ). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.