alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# LI2019046EN.01000101.xml

| 18.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | LI 46/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

LI 46/1

---

COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2019/270

of 18 February 2019

implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1686 imposing additional restrictive measures directed against ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaeda and natural and legal persons, entities or bodies associated with them

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) 2016/1686 of 20 September 2016 imposing additional restrictive measures directed against ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaeda and natural and legal persons, entities or bodies associated with them (1), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 20 September 2016 the Council adopted Regulation (EU) 2016/1686. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 20 September 2016 the Council adopted Regulation (EU) 2016/1686.

| (2) | In view of the continued threat posed by ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaeda and natural and legal persons, entities or bodies associated with them, one person should be added to the list of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies set out in Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2016/1686. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In view of the continued threat posed by ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaeda and natural and legal persons, entities or bodies associated with them, one person should be added to the list of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies set out in Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2016/1686.

| (3) | Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2016/1686 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2016/1686 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2016/1686 is amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 February 2019.

For the Council

The President

F. MOGHERINI

---

(1)  
  OJ L 255, 21.9.2016, p. 1.

1

---

ANNEX

The following person is added to the list set out in Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2016/1686:

| ‘4. | Brahim el KHAYARI; date of birth: 7 May 1992; place of birth: Nîmes (France); nationality: French.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘4.

---
#### Glenn Franklin ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 00-5107.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 6, 2001.

Rehearing Denied March 5, 2001.

Before LOURIE, GAJARSA, and DYK, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

*AFFIRMED. See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2020013DE.01005801.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 17.1.2020 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 13/58 |

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) 2019/876 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 20. Mai 2019 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 575/2013 in Bezug auf die Verschuldungsquote, die strukturelle Liquiditätsquote, Anforderungen an Eigenmittel und berücksichtigungsfähige Verbindlichkeiten, das Gegenparteiausfallrisiko, das Marktrisiko, Risikopositionen gegenüber zentralen Gegenparteien, Risikopositionen gegenüber Organismen für gemeinsame Anlagen, Großkredite, Melde- und Offenlegungspflichten und der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 648/2012

(Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 150 vom 7. Juni 2019)

Auf Seite 104, Absatz 5:

Anstatt:

| | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| „(5) | Für Risikopositionen in Eigenkapitalinstrumenten berechnen Institute die JTD-Bruttobeträge nicht anhand der in den Absätzen 1 und 2 genannten Formeln, sondern wie folgt: | | | | --- | --- | | | JTDshort = min {LGD · V + P&Lshort + Adjustmentshort; 0} | | | | | --- | --- | | | JTDshort = min {LGD · V + P&Lshort + Adjustmentshort; 0}“ | |

muss es heißen:

| | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| „(5) | Für Risikopositionen in Eigenkapitalinstrumenten berechnen Institute die JTD-Bruttobeträge nicht anhand der in den Absätzen 1 und 2 genannten Formeln, sondern wie folgt: | | | | --- | --- | | | JTDlong = min {LGD · V + P&Llong + Adjustmentlong; 0} | | | | | --- | --- | | | JTDshort = min {LGD · V + P&Lshort + Adjustmentshort; 0}“. | |

---
40296.

#### CAPITOL ENTERPRISES, INC. v. MOORE.

Pannell, Judge.

A petition in trover brought by a plaintiff (Capitol Enterprises, Inc.) against a defendant (Henry T. Moore) alleging, “First: Henry T. Moore of said county, the defendant herein, is in possession of the following property, to wit: Wittnauer Camera and Projector serial number 34010 as described in a Conditional Sales Contract dated September 8, 1961 executed by said Henry T. Moore of the value of $443.88 to which plaintiff claims title or a valuable interest *578therein and the right of possession.- Second: That said defendant refuses to deliver the above -described property to petitioner or pay it the profits thereof,” is in conformity with what is known as the statutory, or “Jack Jones” form of pleadings (Ga. L. 1847, p. 490), and is not subject to general demurrer. *Macon &c. R. Co. v. Meador Bros.,*67 Ga. 672; *Dugas v. Hammond,*130 Ga. 87 (60 SE 268); *Crews v. Roberson,*62 Ga. App. 855 (1) (10 SE2d 114); *Breen v. Barfield,*80 Ga. App. 615 (56 SE2d 791); *Greenwood v. Stewart,*86 Ga. App. 764 (72 SE2d 539); *Hurt & Quinn, Inc. v. Keen,*89 Ga. App. 4 (1), 5 (78 SE2d 345); *Abney v. Thomas Auto Sales Co.,*93 Ga. App. 224 (2) (91 SE2d 189); *Herrington v. Cason Goins, Inc.,*97 Ga. App. 747 (1) (104 SE2d 502); *Allen v. Harvey Motor Co.,*103 Ga. App. 277 (1) (119 SE2d 50). The additional phrase, “as described in a conditional sales contract dated September 8, 1961, executed by Henry T. Moore,” is what it purports to be, descriptive only, *Breen v. Barfield,*80 Ga. App. 615, supra, and is not an additional allegation of evidentiary fact from which inferences may legitimately arise adverse to the plaintiff’s right to recover; nor is the petition made ambiguous by such additional averments, nor are such allegations in direct conflict with the plaintiff’s right of recovery, as was true in *Hurt & Quinn, Inc. v. Keen,*89 Ga. App. 4 (2, 3), supra; *Abney v. Thomas Auto Sales Co.,*93 Ga. App. 224 (3), supra; *General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Jones,*98 Ga. App. 391 (106 SE2d 67); nor would said allegation convert said action into an action in trover based on a conditional sales contract in which instance it would be necessary to allege a default by the defendant giving the holder a right to possession upon demand. See *American Nat. Bank*&c. *Co. v. Davis,*104 Ga. App. 586 (122 SE2d 477).

Decided October 18, 1963

Rehearing denied October 30, 1963.

*Doyle C. Brown, Andrew A. Smith, Marvin O’Neal, Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*Edwards, Bentley*efe *Awtrey, A. Sidney Parker,*contra.

It follows, therefore, that the trial judge erred in sustaining the general demurrer to the petition in the instant case.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Bell, P. J., and Hall, J., concur.*
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Assistant Secretary of State for Consular Affairs Bitter Travels to Chicago, Detroit, and Lansing

# 									Assistant Secretary of State for Consular Affairs Bitter Travels to Chicago, Detroit, and Lansing							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

May 23, 2022

Assistant Secretary of State for Consular Affairs Rena Bitter will travel May 23-24 to Chicago, Detroit, and Lansing.  In Chicago and Detroit, she will observe U.S. passport facility operations and meet with staff.  In Lansing, she will observe operations at the National Passport Information Center and meet with staff.

For press inquiries please contact CAPRESSREQUESTS@state.gov.

Tags

Bureau of Consular AffairsIllinoisMichiganOffice of Public LiaisonOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial Domestic Travel

Back to Top
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Advancing Technology Governance to Protect Rights and Safety

# 											Advancing Technology Governance to Protect Rights and Safety									

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

November 13, 2023

The United States prioritizes working with global partners to advance rights-respecting technology governance through multistakeholder and multilateral fora. 

To further these efforts, U.S. Special Envoy and Coordinator for Digital Freedom Eileen Donahoe joined French Minister for Digital Transition and Telecommunications Jean-Noël Barrot, State Secretary for Children Charlotte Caubel, and Ambassador for Digital Affairs Henri Verdier on November 9 to announce U.S. support for the Children Online Protection Laboratory.  This announcement, by Special Envoy Donahoe, occurred at the inaugural high-level year in review event for the multistakeholder initiative of the same name led by the French government to improve the safety of digital services for vulnerable users.  Protecting children online is a core principle of the Biden-Harris Administration’s technology platform accountability efforts, and especially critical as we work to advance safe and responsible development of new and emerging technologies, like artificial intelligence.  The United States remains steadfast in our call for stronger privacy and online protections for children and young people, and committed to preventing and addressing their exploitation, harassment and abuse. Special Envoy Donahoe also announced on November 13 the United States will co-chair, along with France, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)’s DIS/MIS Information Resource Hub.  The Hub is a key multistakeholder platform for cooperation with OECD member states and non-member states, at which decision makers, along with representatives of civil society, academia, and the private sector will meet to discuss challenges including the role of generative AI, share best practices, and find effective and rights-respecting solutions to countering mis- and disinformation.

Promoting online safety and preventing the erosion of information integrity are central U.S. government priorities.  President Biden and Secretary Blinken have made it clear that the United States should engage globally to advance solutions to these critical challenges that promote safety and accountability while protecting freedom of expression.

As Special Envoy and Coordinator for Digital Freedom, Donahoe leads the Department of State’s efforts to engage foreign partners to advance the innovative design, application, and governance of technology to advance digital freedom, anchored in international law and rights-respecting values.

Tags

Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital PolicyChild ProtectionCyber SecurityOffice of the Special Envoy for Critical and Emerging TechnologyOffice of the SpokespersonScience, Technology, and InnovationThe Secretary of StateTechnology

Back to Top
#### § 515.408 Access to certain safe deposit boxes prohibited.

Section 515.201 prohibits access to any safe deposit box within the United States in the custody of any designated national or containing any property in which any designated national has any interest or which there is reasonable cause to believe contains property in which any such designated national has any interest. Attention is directed to § 515.517 which authorizes access to such safe deposit boxes under certain conditions.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 22-50246

Summary Calendar

Nancy Alanis, 

Plaintiff—Appellant,

versus

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.; Wells Fargo Bank, National 

Association, As Trustee for The Pooling and Servicing 

Agreement Dated as of October 1, 2006 Securitized 

Asset Backed Receivables LLC Trust 2006-NC3 Mortgage 

Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-NC3; Mackie 

Wolf Zientz & Mann, P.C, As Debt Collector; Mark D. 

Cronenwett; Richard Dwayne Danner, 

Defendants—Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC 5:21-CV-1261

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 22, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-50246 Document: 00516587377 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/22/2022
No. 22-50246

2

Before Jones, Stewart, and Haynes, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Nancy Alanis appeals the district court’s orders (1) granting 

Defendants’ motions to dismiss and denying her motion to amend her 

complaint, (2) granting Defendants’ motion to declare her a vexatious 

litigant, and (3) denying her motion to alter the judgment. Alanis’s dismissed 

suit is at least her sixth in eleven years against Defendants and her second in 

federal court. All concern the same foreclosure dispute.

The court has carefully considered this appeal in light of the briefs, the 

record, and the opinions of the district court. Having done so, we find no 

reversible error of fact or law and AFFIRM for essentially the reasons stated 

in the district court’s thorough and well-reasoned opinions. 

Accordingly, Alanis’s numerous pending motions are DENIED AS 

MOOT. 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

Case: 22-50246 Document: 00516587377 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/22/2022
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense Billing

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal Nos. 09-40]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601-3740.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittals 09-40 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

Dated: August 12, 2009.

Patricia L. Toppings,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 42273)          ( print page 42274)          ( print page 42275)          ( print page 42276)          ( print page 42277)          ( print page 42278)          ( print page 42279)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[FR Doc. E9-20011 Filed 8-20-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Assistant Secretary of State Satterfield Travels to Los Angeles

# 									Assistant Secretary of State Satterfield Travels to Los Angeles							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

January 31, 2024

From January 31 – February 5, 2024, Assistant Secretary of State for Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Lee Satterfield will travel to Los Angeles to build on Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s recent launch of the Global Music Diplomacy Initiative and expand it by engaging with leaders in the music industry, as well as attend the 66th Annual GRAMMY Awards presented by The Recording Academy®.

In September 2023, Secretary Blinken launched the Global Music Diplomacy Initiative, and outlined three initial efforts by the United States to elevate music as a diplomatic tool, including a new public-private partnership with The Recording Academy® and the creation of the American Music Mentorship Program; expanded efforts to use music to teach English globally; and the Fulbright-Kennedy Center Visiting Scholar Award in Arts and Science. In addition, music icon Quincy Jones was awarded the first-ever Peace through Music Award. Click here to learn more.

The Global Music Diplomacy Initiative and the American Music Mentorship Program, a Partnership between the U.S. Department of State and The Recording Academy, builds on the bipartisan PEACE Through Music Diplomacy Act, which President Biden signed into law and called on the Department to expand public-private partnerships in support of music diplomacy. In addition, American Music Abroad, Arts Envoy, Center Stage, Next Level, and OneBeat are all key components of the Global Music Diplomacy Initiative.

For more information, contact ECA-Press@state.gov.

Tags

Bureau of Educational and Cultural AffairsCaliforniaMusic DiplomacyOffice of Public LiaisonOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial Domestic TravelPublic-Private Partnerships

Back to Top
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATIONS OF ALLEN K.
MEREDITH AND CHARLES P. WINGARD



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Meredith Enterprises, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Allen K. Meredith, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    ALLEN K.
MEREDITHAllen K. Meredith




A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Meredith Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Meredith Enterprises, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



1



---



Exhibit 99.1
(cont.)



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Meredith Enterprises, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles P. Wingard, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    CHARLES P.
WINGARDCharles P. Wingard




A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Meredith Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Meredith Enterprises, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



2
§ 23.49 Alternate funds disbursal procedure. ( a ) When Treasury withholds funds from a recipient under these regulations, the Secretary may disburse the withheld funds directly to an alternate recipient, where appropriate: Any public or non-profit private organization or agency, or State or political subdivision of the State.
( b ) The Secretary will require any alternate recipient to demonstrate: ( 1 ) The ability to comply with these regulations; and
( 2 ) The ability to achieve the goals of the Federal statute authorizing the Federal financial assistance.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 347.41 Additional requirements; bond of indemnity. The Commissioner of the Fiscal Service may require: ( a ) Such additional evidence to support a requested action as he or she may consider necessary or advisable; or
( b ) A bond of indemnity, with or without surety, in any case in which he or she may consider such a bond necessary for the protection of the interests of the United States.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 203.18 Scope of the subpart.

This subpart governs the operation of the investment program, including the rules that TT&L depositaries must follow in crediting and debiting TIP main account balances, SDI account balances, and TIO account balances, and pledging collateral security.
40184.

#### WADDELL v. CITY OF ATLANTA et al.

Felton, Chief Judge.

1. In a joint and several tort action against several defendants the judgment sustaining special demurrers filed by one of the defendants with leave to amend is not reviewable by this court. *Code Ann.*§ 81-1001 and cases cited under catchword “Demurrers.”

2. In such an action the judgment sustaining special demurrers of another defendant, the grounds of which were multifariousness and misjoinder of parties defendant, is not a final judgment reviewable by this court. In such a case the plaintiff has an election (1) by amendment to strike such causes of *104action and parties defendant as will meet the judgment on demurrers or (2) to refuse to amend, invoke a final judgment dismissing the actions and have reviewed the final judgment dismissing the actions and the antecedent judgment requiring the election as to causes of action and parties defendant. *Spence v. Rodgers,*61 Ga. App. 854 (7 SE2d 787). “Misj oinder of parties or causes of action must be taken advantage of by special demurrer, and is not ground for general demurrer.” *Waters v. DeKalb County,*208 Ga. 741 (3) (69 SE2d 274).

Decided June 25, 1963.

*Oze R. Horton, Charles W. Anderson,*for plaintiff in error.

*Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Mwrphy, Lokey & Bowden, Charles M. Lokey, Edward E. Dorsey, John T. Marshall,*contra.

Since there is no final judgment and since the action is still pending in the trial court as to all of the defendants the writ of error must be dismissed. *Bagley v. Bagley,*194 Ga. 154 (20 SE2d 760).

*Writ of error dismissed.*

*Eberhardt and Russell, JJ., concur.*