alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 346.10 Reissue. ( a ) *Addition or change of beneficiary.* An Individual Retirement Bond will be reissued to add a beneficiary in the case of a single ownership bond, or to eliminate or substitute a beneficiary in the case of a bond registered in beneficiary form upon the owner's request on Form PD 3564. No consent will be required to support any reissue transaction from a beneficiary whose name is to be removed from the registration of an Individual Retirement Bond. If the registered owner dies after the bond has been presented and surrendered for reissue, upon receipt of notice thereof by the agency to which the request for reissue was submitted, such request shall be treated as ineffective, provided the notice of death is received by the Federal Reserve Bank or the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, Division of Transactions and Rulings, Parkersburg, WV 26101, to which the request was sent, in sufficient time to withhold delivery, by mail or otherwise, of the reissued bond.
( b ) *Error in issue—change of name.* Reissue of an Individual Retirement Bond will be made where an error in issue has occurred, as well as in cases where the owner's name has been changed by marriage, divorce, annulment, order of court, or in any other legal manner upon an appropriate request. Information as to the procedure to be followed in securing such reissue may be obtained from a Federal Reserve Bank or the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, Division of Transactions and Rulings, Parkersburg, WV 26101.
(26 U.S.C. 220 and 31 U.S.C. 757)
[40 FR 4240, Jan. 28, 1975, as amended at 42 FR 37520, July 21, 1977]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 8, 2011 

p0228 

Order 

 

March 8, 2011 

142000 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142000 

 COA: 299681 

Calhoun CC: 2009-002988-FC 

VERNON WATTS TURMAN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 21, 2010 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

Editorial Note on Part 363
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 363 appear at 70 FR 57433, Sept. 30, 2005, 70 FR 57442, Sept. 30, 2005, and 75 FR 70815, Nov. 19, 2010.

§ 363.126 Under what circumstances will payment be made? We will make payment: ( a ) Upon your request for redemption prior to maturity;
( b ) When the bond reaches final maturity; and
( c ) If a person who becomes entitled to the bond is unable, unwilling or ineligible to open a TreasuryDirect ® account.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

###### Editorial Note on Part 363

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 363 appear at 70 FR 57433, Sept. 30, 2005, 70 FR 57442, Sept. 30, 2005, and 75 FR 70815, Nov. 19, 2010.

#### § 363.164 Is a converted savings bond eligible to be converted back into a definitive bond?

Once a definitive savings bond has been converted to a book-entry bond, it may not be converted back into a definitive bond.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of Transcend Services, Inc., certifies that to the undersigneds knowledge, the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the
information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Transcend Services, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made
solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Larry G. Gerdes    
|Larry G. Gerdes        
|Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 9, 2010
PUBLIC LAW 110–200—APR. 18, 2008 122 STAT. 695 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5813: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008): 

Apr. 16, considered and passed House. 

Apr. 17, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–200 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To amend Public Law 110–196 to provide for a temporary extension of programs 

authorized by the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 beyond 

April 18, 2008. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF AGRICULTURAL 

PROGRAMS AND SUSPENSION OF PERMANENT PRICE 

SUPPORT AUTHORITIES. 

Effective as of April 18, 2008, section 1 of Public Law 110– 

196 (122 Stat. 653) is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘the Secretary of Agriculture shall carry out the authorities, until April 18, 2008’’ 

and inserting ‘‘the authorities shall be carried out, until April 

25, 2008’’; and 

(2) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘April 18, 2008’’ and 

inserting ‘‘April 25, 2008’’. 

Approved April 18, 2008. 

Effective date. 

Apr. 18, 2008 

[H.R. 5813] 


dkrause on GSDDPC29 with PUBLIC LAWS
_________________________________________ 

 

 

___________________________________ 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

June 20, 2008 

136217 

MARK ANDERSON, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

 SC: 136217 

 CoA: 281128 

On order of the Chief Justice, plaintiff-appellant having failed to pay the 

entry fee, the application for leave to appeal is dismissed. 

jm 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 20, 2008 

Clerk
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodrigo ENCISO-ACEVES, a/k/a Francisco Carreon Robles, a/k/a Manuel Lopez Casillas, a/k/a Manuel Morales Gonzalez, a/k/a Rodrigo Enciso Aceves, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 99-50431.

D.C. No. CR-98-01218-CM-1.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 12, 2001.1

Decided Feb. 21, 2001.

Before LEAVY, THOMAS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

1

. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM2

Rodrigo Enciso-Aceves appeals his conviction, pursuant to a guilty plea, and sentence for being a deported alien found in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Relying on *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), Enciso-Aceves contends that the district court erred when it increased his base offense level by 16 points, because the fact that his prior deportation followed an aggravated felony conviction was neither admitted nor proven beyond a reasonable doubt to a jury. He further contends that *Apprendi*calls into question the continuing validity of *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Enciso-Aceves’s contentions, however, are foreclosed by our recent decision in *United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda,*234 F.3d 411, 413-14 (9th Cir.2000).

AFFIRMED.

2

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
EPA EDIR# 4250(a) Received: August 5, 2011EPA EDIR# 4250(a) Received: August 5, 2011EPA EDIR# 4250(a) Received: August 5, 2011
From: Chuck French/RTP/USEPA/US

To: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Amy Branning/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Paula VanLare/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Sharon

Nizich/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Steve Fruh/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 04/07/2010 03:34 PM

Subject: RE: Interagency comments under EO 12866 on the Gold Ore Processing

NESHAP Draft NPRM

Hi Heidi,

We added the percent costs to the slide to answer your question (shown below).See

attached. I am also working on getting the information together on CEMs and hope

to send you that info soon.

Thanks.

Chuck

(See attached file: Gold Mines

‐ emissions

‐ reductions

‐ costs

‐ each

‐ affected

source.ppt)

From: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov>

To: Chuck French/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Steve Fruh/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Sharon Nizich/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Amy

Branning/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Paula VanLare/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 04/07/2010 01:49 PM

Subject: RE: Interagency comments under EO 12866 on the Gold Ore Processing

NESHAP Draft NPRM

Thanks Chuck, this is a great breakout of emissions and potential reductions by

process group. Is it possible to show what percentage of the cost is associated

with each process group?

I believe we also look forward to learning more about CEMs for Mercury in the US.

Thank you,

heidiAffected ProcessesMercury emissions inyear 2007, baseline forMACT rule (in lbs/yr)Estimated Reductionsby MACT (lb/yr)% Reduction from2007 emissions(post-MACT)Ore Pre-treatmentprocesses3,3832,15064%Carbon processes1,5371,39791%Non-carbonprocesses13912590%Total5,0593,67273%EstimatedMercuryEmissionsandEmissionsReductionsEstimatesofCostsandCostEffectivenessCapital costTotal annualized costAverage cost effectiveness$4.8 million$2.3 million/year$1,400/lb HgEstimated Percent of the Costs for each Affected SourceGroup% of total costCarbon60Non-carbon concentrate8Ore pretreatment32
#### § 28.210 Military and merchant marine educational institutions.

These Title IX regulations do not apply to an educational institution whose primary purpose is the training of individuals for a military service of the United States or for the merchant marine.
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 06-2472

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v.

RASHAUN JONES,

Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on April 11, 2008, is

amended as follows:

On page 24, line 9: "3,321.16 kilograms" should be

"3,348.16 kilograms."
Exhibit
31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Avanir Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Dated: February 2, 2010
    /s/ Keith A. KatkinKeith A. KatkinPresident and Chief Executive Officer
[Principal Executive Officer]
#### § 525.314 U.S. financial institution.

The term *U.S. financial institution* means any U.S. entity (including its foreign branches) that is engaged in the business of accepting deposits, making, granting, transferring, holding, or brokering loans or other extensions of credit, or purchasing or selling foreign exchange, securities, commodity futures or options, or procuring purchasers and sellers thereof, as principal or agent. It includes depository institutions, banks, savings banks, trust companies, securities brokers and dealers, futures and options brokers and dealers, forward contract and foreign exchange merchants, securities and commodities exchanges, clearing corporations, investment companies, employee benefit plans, and U.S. holding companies, U.S. affiliates, or U.S. subsidiaries of any of the foregoing. This term includes those branches, offices, and agencies of foreign financial institutions that are located in the United States, but not such institutions' foreign branches, offices, or agencies.
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 162 (Monday, August 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 42670]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-20235]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 1494-348-OK]

Grand River Dam Authority; Notice of Availability of 
Environmental Assessment

August 14, 2009.

    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's regulations, 18 CFR part 
380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47879), the Office of Energy Projects has 
reviewed Grand River Dam Authority's proposed shoreline management plan 
(SMP) for the Pensacola Hydroelectric Project, located on the Grand 
River in Craig, Delaware, Mayes, and Ottawa Counties, Oklahoma, and has 
prepared an environmental assessment (EA) on the SMP.
    A copy of the EA is on file with the Commission and is available 
for public inspection. The EA may also be viewed on the Commission's 
Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the 
docket number (P-1494) excluding the last three digits in the docket 
number field to access the document. For assistance, contact FERC 
Online Support at [email protected] or toll-free at 1-866-208-
3676, or for TTY, (202) 502-8659.
    Any comments on the EA should be filed by September 14, 2009, and 
should be addressed to the Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Room 1-A, Washington, DC 20426. 
Please reference the project name and project number (P-1494-348) on 
all comments. Comments may be filed electronically via the Internet in 
lieu of paper. The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings. 
See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's 
Web site under the ``eFiling'' link. For further information, contact 
Brian Romanek at (202) 502-6175.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-20235 Filed 8-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
```

[110th Congress Public Law 312]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ312.110]

[[Page 122 STAT. 3013]]

Public Law 110-312
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To provide for the continued performance of the functions of the United 
     States Parole Commission. <<NOTE: Aug. 12, 2008 -  [S. 3294]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress <<NOTE: United 
States Parole Commission Extension Act of 2008. 18 USC 3551 
note.>> assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``United States Parole Commission 
Extension Act of 2008''.
SEC. 2. AMENDMENT OF SENTENCING REFORM ACT OF 1984.

    For purposes of section 235(b) of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 
(18 U.S.C. 3551 note; Public Law 98-473; 98 Stat. 2032), as such section 
relates to chapter 311 of title 18, United States Code, and the United 
States Parole Commission, each reference in such section to ``21 years'' 
or ``21-year period'' shall be deemed a reference to ``24 years'' or 
``24-year period'', respectively.

    Approved August 12, 2008.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 3294:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008):
            July 21, considered and passed Senate.
            July 29, 31, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-20076 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. JUAN CARLOS MEDELLIN-TORRES Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:07-CR-291-1
Before WIENER, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Juan Carlos Medellin-Torres (Medellin) appeals his guilty plea convictions and sentences for possession of a firearm by an illegal alien and possession ofa firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) and (5). He argues that his convictions and sentences, which were based on possession ofthe same weapon, are multiplicitous and violate doublejeopardy. The Government concedes that our decision in United Statesv. Munoz-Romo, 989 F.2d 757, 759-60 United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D September 22, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 08-20076

2 (5th Cir. 1993), is controlling. Medellin is correct that his convictions for illegal alien in possession of a firearm and felon in possession of a firearm violate his rights against doublejeopardy. See Munoz-Romo, 989 F.2d at 759-60

. In light of Munoz-Romo, we remand the case so that the district court may vacate one of the convictions and resentence Medellin. See id. Medellin also asserts that the district court erred by imposing a four-level sentencing enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(6), based on a finding that Medellin possessed the firearm “in connection with” another felony. He asserts that there was no evidence presented at rearraignment or sentencing to establish that the firearm was “in close proximity” to the drugs and drug paraphernalia found in his home. See § 2K2.1, comment. (n.14(B)(ii)). Because “we have remanded for resentencing, and it is likely that this same issue will recur,” we will address the claim at this time. See United States v. Buchanan, 485 F.3d 274, 286 (5th Cir. 2007). Medellin did not challenge the imposition of the enhancement in the district court on this ground; we therefore review for plain error. See United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 731-37 (1993); U nited States v. Krout, 66 F.3d 1420, 1434 (5th Cir. 1995). Because Medellin is raising
a factual question that could have been resolved with a proper objection, he cannot establish plain error. See United States v. Vital , 68 F.3d 114, 119 (5th Cir. 1995); United States v. Condren, 18 F.3d 1190, 1199-1200 (5th Cir. 1994). The district court should resentence Medellin in accordance w ith this opinion after vacating one of the convictions. See Buchanan, 485 F.3d at 288. REMANDED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from CSA
Income Fund IV Limited Partnership's Statement of Financial Position as
of June 30, 1997 and Statement of Operations for the six months then
ended and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         763,616
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,197,513
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      51,878,542
<DEPRECIATION>                              28,418,521
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,421,150
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,081,364
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,421,150
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,535,905
<CGS>                                        3,958,579
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,368,115
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               135,210
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             274,326
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,691,395
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,691,395
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,691,395
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.30
<FN>
<F1>The Registrant maintains an unclassified Statement of Financial
Position.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
ALEUTIAN ISLANDS:
BATHYMETRIC MAP TALSe PASS

Oi is | her
eas tar aaa

Prclhed at Weshngren. 0.6
US, DEPARTMENT GF COMMERCE
MAMONAL OCEANOC ANT AIVCUVERC ADWENIEANGH
HATICRAL OCTAN SERVICE
yous

Pityeewerane Conmoue iivteinnies 0 weteNS fo) 2am MetiR OHFTHE
‘ivmCMbeiTED AY mOETER PeTUReRiS THENCE Sd) WATERS 10 tance
ETH SLAMLEMENCED OF 1D METER deTERVALS

Datum wears LOWER GOW WartT

DEEL