alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
31.2**





Certification
Pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)


As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the


Sarbanes
- Oxley Act of 2002





I,
Richard K Brock, certify that:





1.  I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of PLM Equipment Growth Fund V
(the Registrant).





2.  Based on
my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report.





3.  Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.





4.  The
Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:





a)  designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;





b)  evaluated
the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and





c)  disclosed
in this quarterly report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.





5.  The
Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the
Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a)  all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





b)  any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controls over financial
reporting.














Date:
November 11, 2005  By:  /s/
Richard K Brock


Richard K
Brock


Chief
Financial Officer


(Principal
Financial Officer)
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 351.81 Is the Education Savings Bond Program available for Series EE savings bonds?

You may be able to exclude from income for Federal income tax purposes all or part of the interest received on the redemption of qualified bonds during the year. To qualify for the program, you or the coowner (in the case of definitive savings bonds) must have paid qualified higher education expenses during the same year. You also must have satisfied certain other conditions. This exclusion is known as the Education Savings Bond Program. Information about the program can be found in Internal Revenue Service Publications. (For example, see Publication 17, “Your Federal Income Tax,” Publication 550, “Investment Income and Expenses,” and Publication 970, “Tax Benefits for Higher Education.”) These publications are available on the IRS Web site at *http://www.irs.gov.*
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1011 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Union Calendar No. 168
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1011

                          [Report No. 104-317]

 To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act applicable to the 
     construction of a hydroelectric project in the State of Ohio.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 22, 1995

  Mr. Sawyer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Commerce

                            November 7, 1995

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act applicable to the 
     construction of a hydroelectric project in the State of Ohio.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE.

    Notwithstanding the time limitations of section 13 of the Federal 
Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 
upon the request of the licensee for FERC Project No. 9423 (and after 
reasonable notice), is authorized, in accordance with the good faith, 
due diligence, and public interest requirements of such section 13 and 
the Commission's procedures under such section, to extend the time 
required for commencement of construction for the project for up to a 
maximum of 3 consecutive 2-year periods. This section shall take effect 
for the project upon the expiration of the extension (issued by the 
Commission under such section 13) of the period required for 
commencement of construction of such project.
                                     

                                                 Union Calendar No. 168

104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1011

                          [Report No. 104-317]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act applicable to the 
     construction of a hydroelectric project in the State of Ohio.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            November 7, 1995

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

                         CERTIFICATION OF VICE-PRESIDENT
                               BIRCH BRANCH, INC.
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Birch Branch, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George
Powell, Vice-President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ George A. Powell
--------------------------------------
George A. Powell
Vice-President, Secretary and Director
November 13, 2006







                                       13
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 224.7 Where can I find a list of United States district court offices?

A list of the divisional offices of the court in each judicial district may be obtained from the Federal Judiciary, U.S. Courts Web page at *http://www.uscourts.gov*, or by mail by writing to: Office of Public Affairs, Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, Washington, DC 20544.
# LI2020172EN.01001501.xml

| 3.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | LI 172/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

LI 172/15

---

COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING DECISION (CFSP) 2020/733

of 2 June 2020

implementing Decision (CFSP) 2016/849 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 31(2) thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/849 of 27 May 2016 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea and repealing Decision 2013/183/CFSP (1), and in particular Article 33(1) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 27 May 2016, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2016/849. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 27 May 2016, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2016/849.

| (2) | On 11 May 2020, the United Nations Security Council (‘UNSC’) Committee established pursuant to UNSC Resolution 1718 (2006) updated the information relating to one entity subject to restrictive measures. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 11 May 2020, the United Nations Security Council (‘UNSC’) Committee established pursuant to UNSC Resolution 1718 (2006) updated the information relating to one entity subject to restrictive measures.

| (3) | Annex I to Decision (CFSP) 2016/849 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex I to Decision (CFSP) 2016/849 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Annex I to Decision (CFSP) 2016/849 is hereby amended as set out in the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 2 June 2020.

For the Council

The President

G. GRLIĆ RADMAN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 141, 28.5.2016, p. 79.

1

---

ANNEX

In Decision (CFSP) 2016/849, Annex I, Part B (‘Entities’), entry 75 is replaced by the following:

| ‘75. | YUK TUNG ENERGY PTE LTD | | 80 Raffles Place, #17-22 UOB Plaza, Singapore, 048624, Singapore | 30.3.2018 | Ship manager and commercial manager of the YUK TUNG, which conducted ship-to-ship transfer of refined petroleum product.’ |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |

‘75.

YUK TUNG ENERGY PTE LTD

80 Raffles Place, #17-22 UOB Plaza, Singapore, 048624, Singapore

30.3.2018

Ship manager and commercial manager of the YUK TUNG, which conducted ship-to-ship transfer of refined petroleum product.’

---
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 332.11 Reservation as to issue of bonds.

The Secretary of the Treasury reserved the right to reject any application for Series H bonds, in whole or part, and to refuse to issue or permit to be issued hereunder any such bonds in any case or any class or classes of cases, if such action was deemed to be in the public interest. Any action in any such respect was final.
§ 1024.540 Voluntary information sharing among financial institutions. ( a ) Refer to § 1010.540 of this chapter.
( b ) [Reserved]
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

Editorial Note on Part 356
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 356 appear at 70 FR 57439, Sept. 30, 2005.

§ 356.25 How does the settlement process work? Securities bought in the auction must be paid for by the issue date. The payment amount for awarded securities will be the settlement amount as defined in § 356.2. (See formulas in appendix B.) There are several ways to pay for securities: ( a ) *Payment by debit entry to a deposit account.* If you are paying by debit entry to a deposit account as provided for in § 356.17(b), we will charge the settlement amount to the specified account on the issue date.
( b ) *Payment by authorized charge to a funds account.* Where the submitter's method of payment is an authorized charge to the funds account of a depository institution as provided for in § 356.17(c), we will charge the settlement amount to the specified funds account on the issue date.
( c ) *Payment through a certificate of indebtedness.* If you are paying with the redemption proceeds of your certificate of indebtedness as provided for in § 356.17(b), we will redeem the certificate of indebtedness for the settlement amount of the security and apply the proceeds on the issue date.
[69 FR 45202, July 28, 2004, as amended at 70 FR 57440, Sept. 30, 2005; 73 FR 14938, Mar. 20, 2008; 87 FR 40440, July 7, 2022]
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SHUYING LIANG,

Petitioner,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 15

- 71224

Agency No. A099

- 903

- 949

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 7, 2018 **
Pasadena, California

Before: GRABER, W. FLETCHER, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Shuying Liang, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration

j udge’s (“IJ”) denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the

Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We review for substantial evidence the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAR 12 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2

agency’ s factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility

determinati ons created by the REAL ID Act. Shrestha v. Holder , 590 F.3d 1034,

1039

- 40 (9th Cir. 2010). As the parties are familiar with the facts , we do not

recount them here. We deny the petition.

S ubstantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination

based on inconsistencies between Liang’s testimony and the household registries,

and Liang’s inconsistent testimony as to whether she was under residential

surveillance following h er release from detention

. See id. at 1048 ( holding that the

adverse credibility finding was reasonable under the totality of the circumstances).

Liang’s explanations for the inconsistencies do not compel a contrar y result. See

Zamanov v. Holder , 64 9 F.3d 969, 974 (9th Cir. 2011). Contrary to Liang’s

contention, the agency was entitled to discount the abortion certificate she

submitted because the document was issued sixteen years after her alleged forced

abortion and was obtained through suspect me ans. See Lin v. Gonzales , 434 F.3d

1158, 1162 (9th Cir. 2006) (noting that the agency may discount the probative

value of documents if the record “include[s] some evidence undermining their

reliability, such that a reviewing court can objectively verify w hether the IJ has a

legitimate basis to distrust the documents ” (citation and internal quotation marks

omitted)).3

In the absence of credible testimony, Liang’s asylum and withholding of

removal claims fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft , 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003).

Finally, Liang’s CAT claim also fails because it rests on the same evidence

the agency found not credible, and Liang points to no other evidence in the record

that compels the conclusion that it is more likely than not s he would be torture d by

,

or with the consent or acquiescence of

, a public official in China. See id . at 1156

-

57.

PETITION DENIED

.
mJl. Jtj k fk~.~.ft/i&oB~ 

!DC- ~-I}/~ 11 #;1\os ?111rJ 

R-l 2..- ~ ¥o/'oO 

Zo lfl(A_J Zo IS r)akvt"//fZ..I 'fi:x-~s 7{7.SC)'7 

11 c-., f'Lr.· , 11+-- ~~ l1AJ-·~s~~~33, ULc, , ~~Cj P f{')·Lu£- 31, 

~ /ft'rl-1- tL C.tvd?t¥1 Co f ~ b b fh j (flo/£wt 6Ul halu M 

C(flfWO CL-~ { M t!ow.f (!{)p.a.e no.s Lvo7-oofu'fs-sUD; Luo1-

1J 1~9-5 (A-); t~o'7-1 19?o-5(A) ;· ~ t;Jo?-'7/CJCJo--s (A))J ~- J 

{Lepv, Nawrof ,.,..) Cof~ ba.ck ;''IJ& doh ~f'J/ 1/J .J IIR[J=-htl-

~· o!Jfc£- ~blTI~J {YI£_' h{y<N; ~b J. ~~J o._ ''fkJ.>k 

Atur"f cr ~ 0 f'J .JLd10ALJ ~ (T'e_ J ..J !YL ud-.tJPrd CL t ~ fJ ., .J 

JiJ W~ ) ) ()vtJ naue (\~ .IIJ_c£wt} tJtvO ~Ofj ~ULj 11/J 

' 

o6 ' ~-

..Jp :Jf/1(_ h4\r<_ ~d_; .~ ;} j. fT'f) f~o-:u? MM~ 

-t/w rh.f~!:'J !ld<.c.e- ~/{_ !JVvc6cfJ oPf !jOlvl ~<-L o,.-,e/ 

46&1\h ~ ft;, ~-

RECEIVED lN 

COURT OF CRIMINAt A.PP!AlJ\. 

MAY 2R 2015 

Abet Acosta, Clerl' 

W!&J~> . 

zs· "').·-
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 316.7 Delivery of bonds.

Issuing agents were authorized to deliver Series E bonds either over-the-counter in person, or by mail at the risk and expense of the United States, to the address given by the purchaser, but only within the United States, its territories and possessions, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. No mail deliveries elsewhere were made. If purchased by citizens of the United States temporarily residing abroad, the bonds were delivered to such address in the United States as the purchaser directed.
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1225

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 3 (legislative day, JULY 10), 1995

Received

AN ACT

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to exempt

employees who perform certain court reporting duties

from the compensatory time requirements applicable to

certain public agencies, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1225 RDS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Court Reporter Fair

3 Labor Amendments of 1995’’.

4 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON OVERTIME COMPENSATION FOR

5 COURT REPORTERS.

6 Section 7(o) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938

7 (29 U.S.C. 207(o)) is amended—

8 (1) by redesignating paragraph (6) as para9 graph (7); and

10 (2) by inserting after paragraph (5) the follow11 ing new paragraph:

12 ‘‘(6) The hours an employee of a public agency per13 forms court reporting transcript preparation duties shall

14 not be considered as hours worked for the purposes of sub15 section (a) if—

16 ‘‘(A) such employee is paid at a per-page rate

17 which is not less than—

18 ‘‘(i) the maximum rate established by

19 State law or local ordinance for the jurisdiction

20 of such public agency,

21 ‘‘(ii) the maximum rate otherwise estab22 lished by a judicial or administrative officer and

23 in effect on July 1, 1995, or

24 ‘‘(iii) the rate freely negotiated between the

25 employee and the party requesting the tran-
3

•HR 1225 RDS

1 script, other than the judge who presided over

2 the proceedings being transcribed, and

3 ‘‘(B) the hours spent performing such duties

4 are outside of the hours such employee performs

5 other work (including hours for which the agency re6 quires the employee’s attendance) pursuant to the

7 employment relationship with such public agency.

8 For purposes of this section, the amount paid such em9 ployee in accordance with subparagraph (A) for the per10 formance of court reporting transcript preparation duties,

11 shall not be considered in the calculation of the regular

12 rate at which such employee is employed.’’.

13 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

14 The amendments made by section 2 shall apply after

15 the date of the enactment of this Act and with respect

16 to actions brought in a court after the date of the enact17 ment of this Act.

Passed the House of Representatives August 1,

1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
#### § 34.505 Use of funds—Spill Impact Component.

An activity may be funded in whole or in part if the applicable requirements of subparts C and F of this part are met.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Acting Deputy Secretary of State Nuland’s Travel to Türkiye

# 									Acting Deputy Secretary of State Nuland’s Travel to Türkiye							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

January 27, 2024

Acting Deputy Secretary of State Victoria Nuland will travel to Ankara, Türkiye January 28-29.  While in Ankara, Acting Deputy Secretary Nuland will meet with senior government officials and business leaders to discuss the full range of bilateral, regional, and global issues on which we work together.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonPartnershipsTravelTurkey

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

Editorial Note on Part 353
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 353 appear at 79 FR 8859, Feb. 14, 2014.

§ 353.10 Amounts which may be purchased. The amount of savings bonds of Series EE and HH which may be purchased and held, in the name of any one person in any one calendar year, is computed according to the provisions of § 353.11 and is limited as follows: ( a ) *Series EE* — ( 1 ) *General annual limitation.* $5,000 (principal amount).
( 2 ) *Special limitation.* $4,000 (face amount) multiplied by the highest number of employees participating in an eligible employee plan, as defined in § 353.13, at any time during the calendar year in which the bonds are issued.
( b ) *Series HH* — ( 1 ) *General annual limitation.* $20,000 (face amount).
( 2 ) *Special limitation.* $200,000 (face amount) for bonds received in a calendar year as gifts by an organization which at the time of purchase was an exempt organization under the terms of 26 CFR 1.501(c)(3)-1.
[44 FR 76441, Dec. 26, 1979, as amended at 68 FR 24805, May 8, 2003; 72 FR 67853, Dec. 3, 2007]
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 332.4 Registration.

Series H bonds were permitted to be registered as set forth in subpart B of 31 CFR part 315, also published as Department of the Treasury Circular No. 530.
§ 29.405 Appeals to the Department. ( a ) *Who may file.* Any claimant whose claim for a Federal Benefit Payment has been denied (in whole or part) by the Benefits Administrator in a reconsideration decision under § 29.404(d) may appeal that decision to the Department.
( b ) *Form of appeal.* An appeal must be in writing, must include the claimant's name, address, date of birth and claim number, if applicable, and must state the basis for the appeal.
( c ) *Time limits on Appeals.* ( 1 ) An appeal must be received by the Department within 30 calendar days from the date of the reconsideration decision under § 29.404(d).
( 2 ) The Department may extend the time limit for filing when the claimant shows that he or she was not notified of the time limit and was not otherwise aware of it, or that he or she was prevented by circumstances beyond his or her control from making the request within the time limit, or for other good and sufficient reason.
( d ) *Final decision.* After consideration of the appeal, the Department will issue a final decision. The Department's decision must be in writing, must fully set forth the Department's findings and conclusions on the appeal, and must contain notice of the right to judicial review provided in § 29.406. Copies of the final decision must be sent to the claimant seeking appeal, to any competing claimants (*see* § 29.407) and to the Benefits Administrator.