42086 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 160 / Thursday, August 20, 2009 / Notices 

1Public Law 107–71, 115 Stat. 597 (November 19, 

2001). 

2See 49 U.S.C. 114(d). The TSA Assistant 

Secretary’s current authorities under ATSA have 

been delegated to her/him by the Secretary of 

Homeland Security. Section 403(2) of the Homeland 

Security Act (HSA) of 2002, Public Law 107–296, 

116 Stat. 2315 (2002), transferred all functions of 

TSA, including those of the Secretary of 

Transportation and the Under Secretary of 

Transportation of Security related to TSA, to the 

Secretary of Homeland Security. Pursuant to DHS 

Delegation Number 7060.2, the Secretary delegated 

to the Assistant Secretary (then referred to as the 

Administrator of TSA), subject to the Secretary’s 

guidance and control, the authority vested in the 

Secretary with respect to TSA, including that in 

section 403(2) of the HSA. 

3 49 U.S.C. 114(f)(3). 

4 49 U.S.C. 114(f)(11). 

5 49 U.S.C. 114(f)(15). 

Dated: August 14, 2009. 

Sunday Aigbe, 

Chief, Regulatory Products Division, U.S. 

Citizenship and Immigration Services, 

Department of Homeland Security. 

[FR Doc. E9–19909 Filed 8–19–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9111–97–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Transportation Security Administration 

Intent To Request Approval From OMB 

of One New Public Collection of 

Information: Pipeline Corporate 

Security Review 

AGENCY: Transportation Security 

Administration, DHS. 

ACTION: 60-Day notice. 

SUMMARY: The Transportation Security 

Administration (TSA) invites public 

comment on an information collection 

requirement abstracted below that we 

will submit to the Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB) for approval in 

compliance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act. The collection will 

assess the current security practices in 

the pipeline industry by way of its 

Pipeline Corporate Security Review 

(PCSR) program, which encompasses 

site visits and interviews, and is part of 

the larger domain awareness, 

prevention, and protection program 

supporting TSA’s and the Department of 

Homeland Security’s (DHS’) missions. 

DATES: Send your comments by October 

19, 2009. 

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed 

or delivered to Ginger LeMay, PRA 

Officer, Office of Information 

Technology, Transportation Security 

Administration, 601 South 12th Street, 

Arlington, VA 20598–6011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Ginger LeMay, PRA Officer, Office of 

Information Technology, TSA–11, 

Transportation Security Administration, 

601 South 12th Street, Arlington, 

Virginia 20598–6011; telephone (571) 

227–3616; e-mail: 

ginger.lemay@dhs.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

In accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 

et seq.), an agency may not conduct or 

sponsor, and a person is not required to 

respond to, a collection of information 

unless it displays a valid OMB control 

number. Therefore, in preparation for 

OMB review and approval of the 

following information collection, TSA is 

soliciting comments to— 

(1) Evaluate whether the proposed 

information requirement is necessary for 

the proper performance of the functions 

of the agency, including whether the 

information will have practical utility; 

(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden; 

(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

(4) Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including using 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology. 

Information Collection Requirement 

The Pipeline Corporate Security 

Review is a new information collection 

request that will assess domain 

awareness, threat prevention, and 

security awareness at various pipeline 

sites across the nation. TSA’s pipeline 

subject matter expert(s) will visit sites, 

interview pipeline operators and/or 

system owners, and use a pipeline 

security review form to gather 

information. 

Under the Aviation and 

Transportation Security Act (ATSA) 1

and delegated authority from the 

Secretary of Homeland Security, TSA 

has broad responsibility and authority 

for ‘‘security in all modes of 

transportation * * * including security 

responsibilities * * * over modes of 

transportation that are exercised by the 

Department of Transportation.’’ 2 TSA 

has additional authorities as well. TSA 

is specifically empowered to develop 

policies, strategies, and plans for 

dealing with threats to transportation,3

oversees the implementation and 

ensures the adequacy of security 

measures at transportation facilities,4

and carries out other appropriate duties 

relating to transportation security.5

Purpose and Description of Data 

Collection 

One way TSA carries out these 

responsibilities in the pipeline mode is 

by assessing current industry security 

practices by way of its PCSR. The PCSR 

encompasses site visits and interviews 

and is one piece of a much larger 

domain awareness, prevention, and 

protection program in support of TSA’s 

and DHS’ missions. TSA is seeking 

OMB approval for this information 

collection so that TSA can ascertain 

minimum security standards and 

identify coverage gaps, activities that are 

critical to carrying out its transportation 

security mission. 

The PCSR is an ‘‘instructive’’ review 

that provides TSA with an 

understanding of certain surface 

transportation owners’/operators’ 

security programs, if they have 

voluntarily adopted such programs. In 

carrying out PCSRs, subject matter 

experts from TSA’s Pipeline Security 

Division conduct site visits of pipeline 

operators throughout the nation that 

elected to adopt security plans. The 

TSA representatives analyze the 

owner’s/operator’s security plan and 

determine if the mitigation measures 

included in the plan are being properly 

implemented. In addition to examining 

the security plan document, TSA 

reviews one or more assets of the 

owner/operator. TSA conducts this 

collection of information on security 

measures to identify security gaps. The 

discussions also provide TSA with a 

method to encourage the pipeline 

owners/operators affected by the PCSRs 

to be diligent in implementing and 

maintaining security-related 

improvements. 

During the pipeline site visits, TSA 

talks with the owner/operator and 

completes a PCSR form, which asks 

questions concerning the following 

topics: (1) Management and oversight of 

the security plan, (2) threat assessment, 

(3) criticality, (4) vulnerability 

assessment, (5) credentialing, (6) 

training, (7) physical security 

countermeasures, (8) information 

technology security, (9) security 

exercises and drills, and (10) incident 

management and communications. TSA 

conducts this collection through 

voluntary face-to-face visits, usually at 

the headquarters facility of the pipeline 

owners/operator. Typically, TSA sends 

one to three employees to conduct a 

three to four hour interview with 

representatives from the owner/ 

operator. TSA then visits one or two of 

the owners/operators assets to further 

assess the implementation of the 

owner’s/operator’s security plan. TSA 


sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 160 / Thursday, August 20, 2009 / Notices 42087 

plans to collect information from 

pipeline operators of all sizes in the 

course of conducting these PCSRs. 

Use of Results 

This program provides TSA with realtime information on current security 

practices within the pipeline mode of 

the surface transportation sector. This 

information allows TSA to adapt 

programs to the changing security 

threat, while incorporating an 

understanding of the improvements 

owners/operators make in their security 

measures. Without this information, the 

ability of TSA to perform its security 

mission would be severely hindered. 

Additionally, the relationships these 

face-to-face contacts foster are critical to 

the Federal government’s ability to 

reach out to the pipeline stakeholders 

affected by the PCSRs. The relationships 

foster a sense of trust and a willingness 

to share information with the Federal 

government. TSA assures respondents 

that the portion of their responses that 

is deemed Sensitive Security 

Information (SSI) will be protected in 

accordance with procedures meeting the 

transmission, handling, and storage 

requirements of SSI set forth in 49 CFR 

parts 15 and 1520. 

The annual hour burden for this 

information collection is estimated to be 

100 hours. While TSA estimates a total 

of 2,200 potential respondents, this 

estimate is based on TSA conducting 12 

visits per year and each visit lasting 8 

hours. There is no cost burden to 

respondents. 

Issued in Arlington, Virginia, on August 

14, 2009. 

Ginger LeMay, 

Paperwork Reduction Act Officer, Office of 

Information Technology. 

[FR Doc. E9–19959 Filed 8–19–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–05–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

Notice of Cancellation of Customs 

Broker Licenses 

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection, U.S. Department of 

Homeland Security. 

ACTION: General notice. 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 641 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, (19 

U.S.C. 1641) and the Customs 

Regulations (19 CFR 111.51), the 

following Customs broker licenses and 

all associated permits are cancelled 

without prejudice. 

Name License No. Issuing port 

Rafael I. Morales ...................................................................................................................................................... 13682 Laredo. 

Deborah C. Martin .................................................................................................................................................... 11423 Los Angeles. 

Thomas Tello ............................................................................................................................................................ 06319 Los Angeles. 

Thomas Tello & Co., Inc .......................................................................................................................................... 09841 Los Angeles. 

World International Freight Forwarders, Inc ............................................................................................................ 04187 New Orleans. 

Kay Diamond, Ltd. dba Salviati & Santori ............................................................................................................... 15788 New York. 

Pronto Cargo Brokers, Inc ....................................................................................................................................... 06437 Miami. 

Dated: August 11, 2009. 

Daniel Baldwin, 

Assistant Commissioner, Office of 

International Trade. 

[FR Doc. E9–20036 Filed 8–19–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9111–14–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

Notice of Cancellation of Customs 

Broker Licenses Due to Death of the 

License Holder 

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection, U.S. Department of 

Homeland Security. 

ACTION: General notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, 

pursuant to Title 19 of the Code of 

Federal Regulations at section 111.51(a), 

the following individual Customs broker 

license and any and all permits have 

been cancelled due to the death of the 

broker: 

Name License # Port name 

Sandra P. Brown .. 06855 Charlotte. 

Dated: August 11, 2009. 

Daniel Baldwin, 

Assistant Commissioner, Office of 

International Trade. 

[FR Doc. E9–20035 Filed 8–19–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9111–14–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

Notice of Issuance of Final 

Determination Concerning 

Multifunctional Machines 

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection, Department of Homeland 

Security. 

ACTION: Notice of final determination. 

SUMMARY: This document provides 

notice that U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (‘‘CBP’’) has issued a final 

determination concerning the country of 

origin of certain multifunctional 

machines which may be offered to the 

United States Government under a 

government procurement contract. 

Based upon the facts presented, in the 

final determination CBP concluded that 

Japan is the country of origin of the 

multifunctional machines for purposes 

of U.S. Government procurement. 

DATES: The final determination was 

issued on August 12, 2009. A copy of 

the final determination is attached. Any 

party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR 

177.22(d), may seek judicial review of 

this final determination within 

September 21, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Karen S. Greene, Valuation and Special 

Programs Branch, Regulations and 

Rulings, Office of International Trade 

(202–325–0041). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is 

hereby given that onlllll, 

pursuant to subpart B of part 177, 

Customs Regulations (19 CFR part 177, 

subpart B), CBP issued a final 

determination concerning the country of 

origin of certain multifunctional 

machines which may be offered to the 

United States Government under a 

government procurement contract. This 

final determination, in HQ H039856, 

was issued at the request of Sharp 

Electronics Corporation under 

procedures set forth at 19 CFR part 177, 

subpart B, which implements Title III of 

the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 2511–18). In the 

final determination, CBP concluded 

that, based upon the facts presented, 


sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES