alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1026.100 Definitions. Refer to § 1010.100 of this chapter for general definitions not noted herein. To the extent there is a differing definition in § 1010.100 of this chapter, the definition in this section is what applies to part 1026. Unless otherwise indicated, for the purposes of this part: ( a ) *Account.* For purposes of § 1026.220: ( 1 ) *Account* means a formal relationship with a futures commission merchant, including, but not limited to, those established to effect transactions in contracts of sale of a commodity for future delivery, options on any contract of sale of a commodity for future delivery, or options on a commodity.
( 2 ) *Account* does not include: ( i ) An account that the futures commission merchant acquires through any acquisition, merger, purchase of assets, or assumption of liabilities; or
( ii ) An account opened for the purpose of participating in an employee benefit plan established under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.
( b ) *Commodity* means any good, article, service, right, or interest described in Section 1a(4) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1a(4)).
( c ) *Contract of sale* means any sale, agreement of sale or agreement to sell as described in Section 1a(7) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1a(7)).
( d ) *Customer.* For purposes of § 1026.220: ( 1 ) *Customer* means: ( i ) A person that opens a new account with a futures commission merchant; and
( ii ) An individual who opens a new account with a futures commission merchant for: ( A ) An individual who lacks legal capacity; or
( B ) An entity that is not a legal person.
( 2 ) *Customer* does not include: ( i ) A financial institution regulated by a Federal functional regulator or a bank regulated by a state bank regulator;
( ii ) A person described in § 1020.315(b)(2) through (4) of this Chapter; or
( iii ) A person that has an existing account, provided the futures commission merchant or introducing broker has a reasonable belief that it knows the true identity of the person.
( 3 ) When an account is introduced to a futures commission merchant by an introducing broker, the person or individual opening the account shall be deemed to be a *customer* of both the futures commission merchant and the introducing broker for the purposes of this section.
( e ) *Financial institution* is defined at 31 U.S.C. 5312(a)(2) and (c)(1).
( f ) *Futures commission merchant* means any person registered or required to be registered as a futures commission merchant with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) under the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1 *et seq.*), except persons who register pursuant to Section 4f(a)(2) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 6f(a)(2)).
( g ) *Introducing broker* means any person registered or required to be registered as an introducing broker with the CFTC under the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1 *et seq.*), except persons who register pursuant to Section 4f(a)(2) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 6f(a)(2)).
( h ) *Option* means an agreement, contract or transaction described in Section 1a(26) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1a(26)).
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 316.12 Fiscal agents.

(a) Federal Reserve Banks and Branches referred to below, as fiscal agents of the United States, are authorized to perform such services as may be requested of them by the Secretary of the Treasury in connection with the redemption and payment of Series E bonds.

(b)

(1) The following Federal Reserve Offices have been designated to provide savings bond services:

| Servicing office | Reserve districts served | Geographic area served |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Federal Reserve Bank, Buffalo Branch, P.O. Box 961, Buffalo, NY 14240 | New York, Boston | CT, MA, ME, NH, NJ (northern half), NY (City & State), RI, VT, Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands. |
| Federal Reserve Bank, Pittsburgh Branch, P.O. Box 867, Pittsburgh, PA 15230 | Cleveland, Philadelphia | DE, KY (eastern half), NJ (southern half), OH, PA, WV (northern panhandle). |
| Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, P.O. Box 27622, Richmond, VA 23261 | Richmond, Atlanta | AL, DC, FL, LA (southern half), MD, MS (southern half), NC, SC, TN (eastern half), VA, WV (except northern panhandle). |
| Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, 250 Marquette Avenue, Minneapolis, MN 55480 | Minneapolis, Chicago | IA, IL (northern half), IN (northern half), MN, MT, ND, SD, WI. |
| Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, MO 64198 | Dallas, San Francisco, Kansas City, St. Louis | AK, AR, AZ, CA, CO, HI, ID, IL (southern half), IN (southern half), KS, KY (western half), LA (northern half), MO, MS (northern half), NE, NM, NV, OK, OR, TN (western half), TX, WA, WY, UT and GU. |

(2) Until March 1, 1996, other Federal Reserve Offices may continue to provide some savings bond services, such services will be phased out over the period prior to that date.

[59 FR 10535, Mar. 4, 1994]
#### Edwin GOTTLIEB, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 99-56273.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 9, 2001.*

Decided Feb. 13, 2001.

*356Before LEAVY, TROTT, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Appellant Edwin Gottlieb appeals the district court’s dismissal of his claims under 26 U.S.C. §§ 7432 and 7433 as time-barred. This court has jurisdiction to review the district court’s final order under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

Because the parties are familiar with the facts, we will not set them out in detail. On appeal, Gottlieb concedes that his claim under § 7432, relating to the IRS’s wrongful failure to release the tax liens, is barred by statute of limitations. However, he contends that the IRS’s repeated refusal to acknowledge that Gottlieb is “off the hook” for the settled tax liabilities constitutes a “continuing wrong”, tolling the two year limitations period under § 7433. We disagree.

Section 7433(d)(3) clearly provides that claims arising from the IRS’s wrongful collection activities “may be brought only within 2 years after the date of the right of action accrues.” As the district court correctly explained, Gottlieb’s claim accrued once he “had a reasonable opportunity to discover all essential elements of a possible cause of action.” 26 C.F.R. § 301.7433-1(g)(2). Accordingly, we agree with the district court that Gottlieb’s claim accrued, at the latest, on November 7, 1995, the date on which the IRS responded unfavorably to his request for administrative relief.

To toll the limitations period under the “continuing wrong” doctrine, Gottlieb must establish that the IRS engaged in repeated collection efforts, occurring after November 7, 1995. *See Nesovic v. United States,*71 F.3d 776, 778 (9th Cir.1995). However, contrary to Gottlieb’s counsel’s assertions,1 the record does not demonstrate that the IRS engaged in any collection activities after November 7,1995. Thus, the district court correctly held that Gottlieb’s claim, filed on December 1, 1998, was barred by the two-year statute of limitations under § 7433.

Alternatively, Gottlieb argues that the six-year statute of limitations under 28 U.S.C. § 2401(a) applies. We disagree. In the absence of a separate statute imposing its own limitations period, § 2401(a) requires that all civil actions against the United States be brought within six years. However, Gottlieb brought his claim under § 7433, and therefore its two-year limitations period applies.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

1

. Gottlieb argues that the tax lien releases, dated January 26, 1998, "still contain a statement that the settled tax year’s tax liability is still owing.” The releases say nothing of the kind. To the contrary, the lien releases conclusively establish that the referenced tax liabilities for 1988, 1989, and 1990 have been satisfied.
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTHCI RCUI T AUGUST 26, 2011 J OHN L EY CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE U

NITED STATE S COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 0- 12 93 6

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock etNos . 1: 09 -m d- 02 03 6- JLK,

1: 09 -cv -2 31 27 -J LK THOMAS LARSEN, BRENT LOW E, JENNIFER P ALACIOS, MARTIN PALACIOS, ANGELA WALSH-DUFFY, Pl ai nt iff s - Ap pe ll ees , vers us J.P. M ORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A ., Defen da nt- App el la nt
.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 0- 12 93 7

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock etNos . 1: 09 -m d- 02 03 6- JLK,

1: 09 -cv -2 34 32 -J LK
VALERIE W ILLIAMS,MEGAN BISS,

BILLY MARTIN RUIZ, DEBORAH RUIZ, JOHN KIRKLAND, JAC QUELINE MILLER, ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pl ai nt iff s - Ap pe ll ees , ver su s J.P. M ORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A ., ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defen da nt- App el la nt
.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal s fr om

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t forth e So ut he rn Dis tri ctof F lo rid a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ (Au gu st26 , 20 11 ) Befo re EDMONDSON an d M ARCUS, Ci rcu itJu dg es , andLAW SON, Dis tri ct * Ju dg e. PER CURI AM: Afte r th e p art ie s fi le d t he ir app el la te bri efs in th is cas e, th e Uni te d S ta te s Supr em e Co ur t d eci de d AT& T Mob il it y LLC v. Co nc ep ci on , 13 1 S . Ct. 1 74 0 (2 01 1) . The d is tri ctco ur t’s o rd er d en y in g Ap pe ll an t’s m ot io n t o s ta y th e

Honora ble Hugh L awson, United States District Judge for the Middle D istrict of * Geor g ia, sitting by

desig nation. 2pr oc eed in gs pe nd in g a rb it rat io n i s VACATED, andth is cas e is ful ly REMANDED

to th e d is tri ctco ur t. The Dis tri ctCo ur t i s t o re co ns id er t he cas e in th e li gh t o f th e Supr em e Co ur t’s Co nc ep ci on op in io n. In th e d is tri ctco ur t, d is co ve ry is to be li m it edto is su es be ari ng si gn ifi can tl y on th e arb it rab il it y

of t hi s d is pu te un ti l t he qu es ti on of a rb it rab il it y

ha s b een de ci de d. VACATED andREMANDED.

3
HomeOffice of Global Criminal JusticeRemarks & Releases...Ambassador Beth Van Schaack’s Video Remarks for Commemoration of Yezidi Genocide

# 									Ambassador Beth Van Schaack’s Video Remarks for Commemoration of Yezidi Genocide							

Video Remarks

Beth Van Schaack, Ambassador-at-Large for Global Criminal JusticeOffice of Global Criminal Justice

August 1, 2023

Tags

Office of Global Criminal Justice

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
See below from Region 2.

Juan

----- Forwarded by Juan Santiago/RTP/USEPA/US on 12/14/2010 09:56 AM ----- From: Steven Riva/R2/USEPA/US To: Juan Santiago/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Raymond W erner/R2/USEPA/US@EPA, Umesh Dholakia/R2/USEPA/US@EPA,

Frank Jon/R2/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 12/14/2010 07:15 AM Subject: Re: Need some additional information from regions on title V narrowing Juan, This is to confirm that Puerto Rico should be moved to the no - narrowing group because they presently don't have the legal authority to regulated GHG's in their title V program. Although they are in the process of revising their regulations to obtain this authority, this change will not occur by January 2, 2011. W e don't expect to have these regulations in place until March/April of 2011. Please see the attached email from Luis Sierra, Air Director at the PREQB, for their time - table. If you have any ques tions or need any additional information, please give me a call at (212) 637 -4074.

------------------ From: "Sierra Torres, Luis R." <LuisSierra@jca.gobierno.pr> To: Umesh Dholakia/R2/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: "Delgado Medero, Leimarys" <LeimarysDelgado@jca.gobierno.pr>, Richard

Ruvo/R2/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 12/10/2010 02:50 PM Subject: RE: EPA's Tailoring Rule for the GHGs

Umesh: My apologies for the delay. We are waiting for the Public Hearing Office to assign date of the hearing. Once we obtain the date, ther e will be around 5 days for Notice, 30 days for comments, 1 day for public hearing, 30 days for public hearing report, 5 - 10 days for Governing Board approval and 5 - 10 days for submission to State Department and 1 - 5 days for submissions to EPA. Since we ha ve been unable to obtain the date, I could only provide with time table instead of dates. As soon as we have a date confirmed for the public hearing, we will provide more accurate information. Also, I want to mention that based on EPA comments, EQB subst antially modify the amendments. We are including the document that was sent for publication. Any comments from EPA will be incorporated as part of the public hearing process.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 315.10 Limitations.

Specific limitations have been placed on the amounts of bonds of each series and savings notes that might be purchased in any one year in the name of any one person or organization. The amounts applicable to each series of bonds and savings notes for each specific year, which has varied from time to time, can be found in the appropriate offering circulars, as revised and amended.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

128866 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 128866 

 COA: 251808 

Ingham CC: 03-000405-FC

MICHAEL PARKS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 10, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would hold this case in abeyance for People v Drohan, lv gtd 472 Mich 

881 (2005). 

t1024 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2005 

Clerk
**Exhibit
      32.2**





Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
      Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the


Sarbanes
      - Oxley Act of 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of PLM Equipment Growth Fund V (the
“Partnership”), on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended September 30, 2005 as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner
      and of the Partnership, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:





(1)  the
      Report of the Partnership filed today fully complies with the requirements
      of
      Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.














/s/
      Richard K Brock


Richard
      K
      Brock


Chief
      Financial Officer of PLM Financial Services, Inc.


(Principal
      Financial Officer)


June
      6,
      2006
Record ofDiscussion Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD



### With whom outsidetheFAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)?

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED Boeing Bob Takara May 14,2013 Concur. Other /Additional Information:



### 8
§ 1.29 Records transferred to Federal Records Center or National Archives of the United States. ( a ) *Records transferred for storage in the Federal Records Center.* Records pertaining to an identifiable individual which are transferred to the Federal Records Center in accordance with 44 U.S.C. 3103 must, for the purposes of the Privacy Act, be considered to be maintained by the component which deposited the record and must be subject to the provisions of the Privacy Act and this subpart. The Federal Records Center must not disclose such records except to Treasury or to others under rules consistent with the Privacy Act. These rules may be established by Treasury or a component. If such records are retrieved for the purpose of making a determination about an individual, Treasury or the relevant component must review them for accuracy, relevance, timeliness, and completeness.
( b ) *Records transferred to the National Archives of the United States* — ( 1 ) *Records transferred to National Archives prior to September 27, 1975.* Records pertaining to an identifiable individual transferred to the National Archives prior to September 27, 1975, as a record which has sufficient historical or other value to warrant its continued preservation by the United States Government, are deemed records maintained by the National Archives, and: ( i ) Must not be subject to the Privacy Act.
( ii ) Except, that a statement describing such records (modeled after 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4)(A) through (G)) must be published in the Federal Register.
( 2 ) *Records transferred to National Archives on or after September 27, 1975.* Records pertaining to an identifiable individual transferred to the National Archives as a record which has sufficient historical or other value to warrant its continued preservation by the United States Government, on or after September 27, 1975, must be deemed records maintained by the National Archives, and: ( i ) Must not be subject to the Privacy Act.
( ii ) Except, that a statement describing such records in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4)(A) through (G) must be published in the Federal Register and rules of conduct and training in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(e)(9) are to be established by the National Archives. (*See* 5 U.S.C. 552a(e).)
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 306.38 Interest on bearer securities.

Unless the offering circular and notice of call provide otherwise, interest on coupon securities is payable in regular course of business upon presentation and surrender of the interest coupons as they mature. Such coupons are payable at participating Federal Reserve banks or by the Bureau.[8] Interest on Treasury bills, and any other bearer securities which may be sold and issued on a discount basis and which are payable at par at maturity, is represented by the difference between the purchase price and the par value, and no coupons are attached.

[38 FR 7078, Mar. 15, 1973, as amended at 64 FR 38126, July 15, 1999]

###### Footnotes -
  306.38

[8] Banking institutions will usually cash the coupons without charge as an accommodation to their customers.
§ 1010.430 Nature of records and retention period. ( a ) Wherever it is required that there be retained either the original or a copy or reproduction of a check, draft, monetary instrument, investment security, or other similar instrument, there shall be retained a copy of both front and back of each such instrument or document, except that no copy need be retained of the back of any instrument or document which is entirely blank or which contains only standardized printed information, a copy of which is on file.
( b ) Records required by this chapter to be retained by financial institutions may be those made in the ordinary course of business by a financial institution. If no record is made in the ordinary course of business of any transaction with respect to which records are required to be retained by this chapter, then such a record shall be prepared in writing by the financial institution.
( c ) The rules and regulations issued by the Internal Revenue Service under 26 U.S.C. 6109 determine what constitutes a taxpayer identification number and whose number shall be obtained in the case of an account maintained by one or more persons.
( d ) All records that are required to be retained by this chapter shall be retained for a period of five years. Records or reports required to be kept pursuant to an order issued under § 1010.370 of this chapter shall be retained for the period of time specified in such order, not to exceed five years. All such records shall be filed or stored in such a way as to be accessible within a reasonable period of time, taking into consideration the nature of the record, and the amount of time expired since the record was made.
[75 FR 65812, Oct. 26, 2010, as amended at 81 FR 76864, Nov. 4, 2016]
HomeOffice of Diversity and InclusionRemarks & Releases...Allyship Disability Inclusion: From State’s Leaders and Colleagues

# 									Allyship Disability Inclusion: From State’s Leaders and Colleagues							

Other Release

December 5, 2022

Tags

Office of Diversity and Inclusion

Back to Top
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

08/04

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 04 Aug 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL
§ 29.522 Fault. ( a ) *General rule.* A debtor is considered to be at fault if he or she, or any other person having an interest in obtaining a waiver of the claim, caused or contributed to the accrual of the overpayment. The Department considers a debtor or any other person having an interest in obtaining a waiver of the claim to have caused or contributed to the accrual of an overpayment if— ( 1 ) Payment resulted from the individual's incorrect but not fraudulent statement, which the individual knew or should have known to be incorrect; or
( 2 ) Payment resulted from the individual's failure to disclose facts in his or her possession which the individual knew or should have known were material, when the Department has identified that the individual has a duty to report and has clearly notified the individual of this reporting requirement.
( 3 ) The following factors may affect the decision as to whether the debtor is or is not at fault where the debtor submitted an incorrect statement, or the debtor failed to disclose material facts in his or her possession— ( i ) The debtor's age;
( ii ) The debtor's physical and/or mental condition; and
( iii ) The availability and nature of the information provided to the debtor by the Department.
( b ) *Knowledge of an overpayment.* ( 1 ) Individuals who are aware that they are not entitled to a payment or are aware that a payment is higher than the payment to which they are entitled are not considered to have contributed to the overpayment if they promptly contact the Benefits Administrator and question the correctness of the payment and take no further action in reliance of the overpayment.
( 2 ) Any contact made with the Benefits Administrator concerning the overpayment within 60 days of receipt (if the overpayment is a recurring payment, contact must be made within 60 days of the initial payment) will satisfy the prompt notification requirement.
( c ) *Reasonable person standard.* The Department will use a reasonable person standard to determine whether an individual should have known that a statement was incorrect or that material facts in the individual's possession should have been disclosed. The reasonable person standard will take into account the objective factors set forth is paragraph (a)(3) of this section.
§ 19.430 How do I check to see if a person is excluded or disqualified? You check to see if a person is excluded or disqualified in two ways: ( a ) You as an agency official must check the *EPLS* when you take any action listed in § 19.425.
( b ) You must review information that a participant gives you, as required by § 19.335, about its status or the status of the principals of a transaction.