alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6648

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

THEODORE ACKERS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,

District Judge. (CR-94-208, CA-96-755-6)

Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: September 3, 1998

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Theodore Ackers, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Francis Joseph, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Ackers, Nos. CR-94-208; CA-96-755-6 (M.D.N.C. Apr.

6, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### In the Matter of Wadsworth Avenue Associates, L.P., on Application of Robert H. Haggerty, Appellant, v Kenneth L. Maynard, Respondent.

[803 NYS2d 909]

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Rolando T. Acosta, J.), entered on or about November 19, 2004, which, in an action by a limited partner against a general partner of a certain partnership, inter alia, denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment removing defendant as general partner, unanimously dismissed, with costs in favor of defendant, payable by plaintiff.

The interlocutory order and judgment denying plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is no longer reviewable on direct appeal, a final, unappealed judgment having since been entered on May 23, 2005 disposing of the action *(see Kirby v Turner Constr. Co.,*286 AD2d 618 [2001]). Were the appeal properly before us, we would find it to be without merit. There was no evidentiary support for plaintiff’s claim that defendant had committed theft. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Marlow, Ellerin, Gonzalez and McGuire, JJ.
```

[Federal Register: September 29, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 188)]
[Notices]               
[Page 60159]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr29se10-117]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7189]

 
Determination Concerning the Bolivian Military and Police Under 
the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs 
Appropriations Act, 2010

    Pursuant to the authority vested in the Secretary of State, 
including under the heading ``International Narcotics Control and Law 
Enforcement'' of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and 
Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2010 (Div. F, Pub. L. 111-117), I 
hereby determine that the Government of Bolivia is investigating, 
prosecuting, and punishing military and police personnel who have been 
credibly alleged to have violated internationally recognized human 
rights.
    This Determination shall be transmitted to the Congress and 
published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: September 17, 2010.
Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-24418 Filed 9-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-29-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1253 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1253

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
  the fourth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-five

                                 An Act

 
  To rename the San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge as the Don 
           Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SAN FRANCISCO BAY NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE RENAMED AS DON 
              EDWARDS SAN FRANCISCO BAY NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE.

    (a) Refuge Renamed.--The San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge 
(established by the Act entitled ``An Act to provide for the 
establishment of the San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge'', 
approved June 30, 1972 (86 Stat. 399 et seq.)), is hereby renamed and 
shall be known as ``the Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife 
Refuge''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in any statute, rule, regulation, 
Executive order, publication, map, or paper or other document of the 
United States to the San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge is 
deemed to refer to the Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife 
Refuge.
    (c) Conforming Amendment.--The Act entitled ``An Act to provide for 
the establishment of the San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge'', 
approved June 30, 1972 (86 Stat. 399 et seq.), is amended by striking 
``San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge'' each place it appears 
and inserting ``Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife 
Refuge''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

CELEBRATION CRUISE LINE, LLC
, Appellant,

v.

OLEKSANDR DOBRIANSKIY; CELEBRATION CRUISE LINE, INC.; GUNEHR SHIPPING LIMITED; and XYZ CORP.
, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 17

- 514

[ August 9, 2017 ]

Appeal of a non

- final order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Michael L. Gates , Judge; L.T. Case No.

15

- 021864 CACE (12)

.

Michael J. Dono, Jerry D. Hamilton and Robert M. Oldershaw of Hamilton, Miller & Birthisel LLP, Miami, for appellant.

No brief filed on behalf of appellees.

P ER C URIAM

.

Celebration Cruise Line, LLC appeals an order denying its motion to dismiss a personal injury suit based upon forum non conveniens.

Because the trial court did not conduct t he analysis required by Kinney System, Inc. v. Continental Ins. Co. , 674 So. 2d 86 (Fla. 1996) , or provide any explanation for denial, we reverse.

A cruise ship employee is suing for negligence under the Jones Act and unseaworthiness after the employee lost a finger and permanently damaged three other fingers while mooring a supply vessel. Appellant moved to dismiss arguing in part that Broward Coun ty is an inconvenient forum and Florida has no nexus to this suit. Appellant provided affidavits and contracts to show that Celebration Cruise Holdings, Inc. sold the ship for scrap before the employee, a Ukrainian citizen, was hired by another company in the Ukraine to help transport the ship from the Bahamas to India. On route to India, he was injured in Namibia. Appellant alleged that it did not own or have control of the ship, it did not hire the employee, the ship was never in Florida after it2 was s old, the employee did not receive medical treatment in Florida, and there are no witnesses here. Appellant was mistakenly listed as the ship owner on the employment contract, but the ship had been sold and delivered to the buyer, Gunehr Shipping, Ltd., be fore the employee was

recruited.

The employee did not provide any evidence to the contrary. He argued that resolution of this issue was premature until he conducted further discovery.

The court did not weigh the Kinney factors at the hearing on the

mo tion to dismiss or make any findings in its order. See also Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.061(a) (codifying the Kinney factors). The court simply denied the motion without explanation.

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. See, e.g., Sybac Solar AG, Co. v. Falz , 174 So. 3d 383 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015)

.

Reversed and remanded.

G ERBER
, C.J., W ARNER and C IKLIN
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 312.5 Fiscal agents to serve without compensation.

All of the fiscal agency employment mentioned in this part shall be performed without compensation, reimbursement for expenses, or allowance of service charges.
#### § 41.6109-1 Identifying numbers.

Every person required under § 41.6011(a)-1 to make a return must provide the identifying number required by the instructions to the form on which the return is made.

[T.D. 8879, 65 FR 17155, Mar. 31, 2000]
AMENDMENT TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


     This Amendment (the "Amendment") is made and entered into as of the 31st
day of March, 1998 by and between WorldPort Communications, Inc., a Delaware
corporation ("WorldPort" or the "Company") and Mr. Paul A. Moore  ("Executive")
and amends that certain Employment Agreement dated as of January 1, 1998 between
the Company and Executive (the "Employment Agreement").

     WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend Section 6(f) of the Employment
Agreement;

     WHEREAS, all capitalized terms used by not defined herein shall have the
meanings given in the Employment Agreement;

     NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as
follows:

     1.   Section 6(f) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended and
restated to read in its entirety as follows:

          "(f)  The Company shall issue to the Executive an aggregate of 500,000
        shares (the "Shares") of the Company's Common Stock, par value $.0001
        per share, in exchange for $1.33 per share.  The Executive shall pay
        $50,000 of the purchase price to the Company in cash and the remaining
        $615,000 shall be paid to the Company by delivery by the Executive of a
        promissory note.  The promissory note shall accrue interest at an annual
        rate of 11%, mature on January 1, 2000 and provide for monthly payments
        of principal and accrued interest.  The promissory note shall be secured
        by a pledge to the Company of the Shares purchased by the Executive
        hereby."

     2.   Except as otherwise amended hereby, all terms and provisions of the
Employment Agreement shall continue in full force and effect as stated therein.


     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day
and year first above written.

                                   WORLDPORT COMMUNICATIONS, INC.


                                   By: 
                                   Name: 
                                   Title: 




                                   Paul A. Moore
- Division Home
- Key Topics
- Contact Us

HomeDivision for Trade Policy and Negotiations...Agricultural Policy

# Agricultural Policy

## The Office of Agricultural Policy supports American agriculture while protecting U.S. national security.

AGP’s work contributes to the strong performance of the American agricultural sector, which exported $177 billion in 2021.

Advancing sustainable, agricultural-led growth increases the availability of food, keeps food affordable, and raises the incomes of the poor. AGP works together with the Office of Global Food Security and the United States Agency for International Development’s (USAID) to advance Feed the Future (FTF), the U.S. government’s global hunger and food security initiative, to combat acute food insecurity and the G-7 New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition, a partnership among G-7 and African governments, and the private sector.

## 							Discover More						

		Agricultural Trade		Read more 

		Biotechnology		Read more 

		Food Security		Read more 

		Food Safety		Read more 

		Feed the Future		Read more 

Back to Top
#### § 16.43 Collection of civil penalties and assessments.

Sections 3806 and 3808(b) of title 31, United States Code, authorize actions for collection of civil penalties and assessments imposed under this part and specify the procedures for such actions.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Announcement of Visa Restriction Policy to Promote Peace, Security, and Stability in the West Bank

# 									Announcement of Visa Restriction Policy to Promote Peace, Security, and Stability in the West Bank							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

December 5, 2023

The United States has consistently opposed actions that undermine stability in the West Bank, including attacks by Israeli settlers against Palestinians, and Palestinian attacks against Israelis. We have underscored to the Israeli government the need to do more to hold accountable extremist settlers who have committed violent attacks against Palestinians in the West Bank. As President Biden has repeatedly said, those attacks are unacceptable. Last week in Israel, I made clear that the United States is ready to take action using our own authorities.

Today, the State Department is implementing a new visa restriction policy targeting individuals believed to have been involved in undermining peace, security, or stability in the West Bank, including through committing acts of violence or taking other actions that unduly restrict civilians’ access to essential services and basic necessities.  Immediate family members of such persons also may be subject to these restrictions.

We will continue to seek accountability for all acts of violence against civilians in the West Bank, regardless of the perpetrator or the victim. We also continue to engage with the Israeli leadership to make clear that Israel must take additional measures to protect Palestinian civilians from extremist attacks. We will also continue to engage the Palestinian Authority to make clear it must do more to curb Palestinian attacks against Israelis. Both Israel and the Palestinian Authority have the responsibility to uphold stability in the West Bank. Instability in the West Bank both harms the Israeli and Palestinian people and threatens Israel’s national security interests. Those responsible for it must be held accountable.

Tags

Bureau of Near Eastern AffairsIsraelIsrael-Hamas ConflictOffice of the SpokespersonPalestinian TerritoriesPeaceThe Secretary of StateSecurityStabilizationVisas

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 14-15248

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cv-02572-AT

NATHAN E. OHUCHE, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BANK OF AMERICA , N.A., 

BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP, 

f.k.a. Countrywide Home Loan Servicing LP, 

FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, 

MCCALLA RAYMER LLC, 

 Defendants - Appellees,

MICHAEL ALLENGOOD,

Individually,

 Defendant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

________________________

(June 17, 2016)

Case: 14-15248 Date Filed: 06/17/2016 Page: 1 of 2 
2

Before HULL and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges, and MORENO,

* District Judge.

PER CURIAM: 

After review of the record and the parties’ briefs, with the benefit of oral 

argument, and for the reasons fully explored at oral argument, we find no 

reversible error in (i) the district court’s October 22, 2014 order denying plaintiff 

Ohuche’s motion for reconsideration (of the district court’s September 10, 2014 

order dismissing certain claims, remanding certain state law claims to the Superior 

Court of Fulton County, and denying Ohuche’s motion to amend his complaint), 

and (ii) “all other orders and judgments of the [district] court.”

As aptly stated by the district court, “after numerous attempts to amend his 

Complaint and refine his theory of liability,” Ohuche appears to “have no other 

valid claims, or at least no valid federal claims that are not time-barred.” Thus,

under these circumstances, Ohuche’s “remaining state law claims would be best 

litigated in state court, where this case originated.”

AFFIRMED.

 

*

Honorable Federico A. Moreno, United States District Judge for the Southern District of 

Florida, sitting by designation.

Case: 14-15248 Date Filed: 06/17/2016 Page: 2 of 2
# L_2020381EN.01002201.xml

| 13.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 381/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 381/22

---

COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2020/1699

of 12 November 2020

amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 26 July 2010 the Council adopted Decision 2010/413/CFSP (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 26 July 2010 the Council adopted Decision 2010/413/CFSP (1).

| (2) | On 18 June 2020 the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2020/849 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 18 June 2020 the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2020/849 (2).

| (3) | Following the judgment of the General Court in Case T-490/18 (3), Neda Industrial Group should be removed from the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures set out in Annex II to Decision 2010/413/CFSP. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Following the judgment of the General Court in Case T-490/18 (3), Neda Industrial Group should be removed from the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures set out in Annex II to Decision 2010/413/CFSP.

| (4) | Annex II to Decision 2010/413/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Annex II to Decision 2010/413/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Annex II to Decision 2010/413/CFSP is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 12 November 2020.

For the Council

The President

M. ROTH

---

(1)  Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP of 26 July 2010 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Common Position 2007/140/CFSP (OJ L 195, 27.7.2010, p. 39).

1

(2)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/849 of 18 June 2020 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ L 196, 19.6.2020, p. 8).

2

(3)  Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2020, Neda Industrial Group v Council of the European Union, T-490/18, ECLI:EU:T:2020:318.

3

Neda Industrial Group v Council of the European Union

---

ANNEX

In Decision 2010/413/CFSP, Annex II, part I, Section B (Entities), the following entry is deleted:

| ‘47. | Neda Industrial Group’. |
| --- | --- |

‘47.

Neda Industrial Group’.

---
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 210.14 Erroneous death information. ( a ) *Notification of error to the agency.* If, after the RDFI responds fully to the notice of reclamation, the RDFI learns that the recipient or beneficiary is not dead or legally incapacitated or that the date of death is incorrect, the RDFI shall inform the agency that certified the underlying payment(s) and directed the Service to reclaim the funds in dispute.
( b ) *Resolution of dispute.* The agency that certified the underlying payment(s) and directed the Service to reclaim the funds will attempt to resolve the dispute with the RDFI in a timely manner. If the agency determines that the reclamation was improper, in whole or in part, the agency shall notify the RDFI and shall return the amount of the improperly reclaimed funds to the RDFI. Upon certification by the agency of an improper reclamation, the Service may instruct the appropriate Federal Reserve Bank to credit the account utilized by the RDFI at the Federal Reserve Bank in the amount of the improperly reclaimed funds.
[64 FR 17487, Apr. 9, 1999, as amended at 69 FR 13189, Mar. 19, 2004]
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit _____________________ 

No. 15-8022 

IN RE: MANUEL R. SUAREZ-JIMENEZ 

Respondent 

__________________

Before 

Torruella, Thompson and Kayatta, 

Circuit Judges. 

__________________ 

ORDER OF COURT 

Entered: February 3, 2017 

 Petitioner seeks rehearing based on his claim that the per curiam opinion did not address 

his argument that Puerto Rico's code of professional ethics could not be applied to him because 

the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution preempts any Commonwealth rule that conflicts 

with the rules of Florida adopted by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. 

The per curiam opinion rejected this "due process violation" as exceeding the scope of due process 

protections afforded to the respondent in an attorney disciplinary proceeding. In any event, the 

argument is without basis in law or fact. Petitioner neither entered an appearance nor was 

authorized to appear or practice in Florida. Plus, he points to no pertinent conflict between the 

Florida and Puerto Rico rules of conduct, presumably because the pertinent rules in all relevant 

U.S. jurisdictions allow for suspensions for, among other things, gross negligence and misleading 

clients. The petition for rehearing is denied. 

By the Court: 

 /s/ Margaret Carter, Clerk 

cc: 

Manuel R. Suarez-Jimenez 

Clerk, Puerto Rico Supreme Court
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 
 CLIENT LICENSE AGREEMENT AMENDMENT 
 Re: License Agreement, dated as of 04/25/2011,
by and between Immune Cellular Therapeutics, as Client and Regent Business Centers Woodland Hills, LLC, as Licensor. 
 The above referenced
Agreement is hereby amended subject to the following modifications or revisions: 
  

	 	1.	The term set forth in the Agreement is hereby extended. The renewal term will commence on 07/01/2012 and will expire on 06/30/2013.


  

	 	2.	The Fixed Monthly Office Fee for the Office #3090/93/94/95 shall be $4,410.00 subject to any modifications and/or revisions, which may be agreed to by
both Regent and Client. 

  

	 	3.	The contents of the Office as set forth in the License Agreement are unchanged. 


 

	 	4.	Refundable Retainer in the amount of $44.00 is required. 

 All capitalized terms used in this Agreement shall have the same meamng as set forth in and defined in the License Agreement. 
 Except as set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the License Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
 Agreed to: 

Dated:                        

  

			
	ImmunoCellular Therapeutics, Ltd.
		
	By:	 	  

	Name:	 	  

	
	Regent Business Centers Woodland Hills, LLC.
		
	By:	 	  

	Name: