alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN

NO. 03-0 8 -00 329 -CR
Laqu int on D av on Spe lls , A ppe lla nt

v . The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF B ELL COUNTY , 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 6198 1 , HO NORAB LE JO E CARROLL , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N Ap pe lla nt L a qu int on

Da vo n Sp e lls ple a de d guil ty to a n in dic tme nt a c c us inghim of delivering mor e than one g ram of c ocaine
. SeeTex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.112 (West 2003)
. T h e court adjudge d him guilty and asse ssed punishment, enhanc ed by a pre vious felony conviction, at twelve y ear s’ in prison. Ap pe lla nt’ s c ourt -a

pp ointe d atto rne y

fi le d a br ie f c on c lud ingthat th e a pp e a l is frivolous and without merit. The brie f mee ts the require ments of An de rs v . Ca lif or nia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by

prese nting a

profe ssional evaluation of the rec ord demonstrating wh y t h er e are no arguable g rounds to be adva nced. Se e als o Pe ns on v . O hio , 4 8 8 U
. S
. 75 (1 98 8) ; Hi gh v . S tate , 57 3 S. W.2 d 8 07 (T e x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 78 ); Cur rie v . S tate , 516 S.W .2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); J ac k so n v . S tate , 4 85 S.W. 2d

55 3 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 72 ); G a i n o u s v . S ta te , 4 3 6 S.W .2d 1372

(Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Appellant re ceive d a copy of counse l’s brief a

nd was advised of hi s rig ht to examine the appellate r ecor d and to file a pro se br ief. No pr o se brief has bee n filed. We have r eviewe d the re c o r d and counse l’s brief a

nd ag ree that the appe al is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the r ecor d that might arguably support the appe al. Counsel’s motion to wit hdrawis gr anted.

The judg ment of convic tion is affirmed.

__________________________________________ W. Kenneth L aw, Chief Justice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Pury ear and Pember

ton Affir med Filed: September

11, 2008 Do No t Pu

bli sh
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: 

Federal Maritime Commission.

# TIME AND DATE: 

August 19, 2009—10 a.m.

# PLACE: 

800 North Capitol Street, NW., First Floor Hearing Room, Washington, DC.

# Status: 

A portion of the meeting will be in Open Session and the remainder of the meeting will be in Closed Session

## Matters To Be Considered

### Open Session

                    1.                     *Docket No. 08-04: Tienshan, Inc.*                     v.                     *Tianjin Hua Feng Transportation Agency Co., Ltd.*                    —Request for Extension of Time.                

2. FY 2009 Budget Status Update.

### Closed Session

                    1.                     *Docket No. 08-05:*                     City of Los Angeles, California, Harbor Department of the City of Los Angeles, Board of Harbor Commissioners of the City of Los Angeles, City of Long Beach, California, Harbor Department of the City of Long Beach, and the Board of Harbor Commissioners of the City of Long Beach—Possible Violations of the Sections 10(b)(10), 10(d)(1) and 10(d)(4) of the Shipping Act of 1984.                

2. Internal Administrative Practices and Personnel Matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Karen V. Gregory, Secretary, (202) 523-5725.

Karen V. Gregory,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-19656 Filed 8-12-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
Exhibit 35.19  LOGO

CommercialMortgageServicing D1050-084, 8th Fl
401 South Tryon Street Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334 ANNUAL
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2016, by and
among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS LLC, as Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, WILMINGTON
TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee and TRIMONT REAL ESTATE ADVISORS, LLC, as Operating Advisor and as Asset Representations Reviewer with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2016-C37 (the Agreement).
Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. Pursuant to Section 11.09 of this
Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:  1.
A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2018 through December 31,
2018 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and  2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations
under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has
executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019. LOGOLeslie Hayton
Managing Director
Wells Fargo Bank  Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


LOGO
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPI RES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, ) as Successor by Merger to the Bank of ) New York, as Trustee for the benefit of ) the asset-backed Certificates, ) Series 2007-2, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D15-1527 ) HENRY RUIZ, ) ) Appellee. ) ________________________________ )

Opinion filed July 15, 2016.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Perry A. Little, Senior Judge.

Susan B. Morrison and Lauren E. Wages of Law Office of Daniel C. Consuegra, P.L., Tampa (withdrew after briefing); Kimberly N. Hopkins of Shapiro, Fishman & Gache, LLP, Tampa (substituted as counsel of record), for Appellant.

Nick Fowler and Sami Thalji of Stamatakis, Thalji, Bonanno, Tampa, for Appellee.- 2 - KELLY, Judge.

The Bank of New York Mellon appeals from the order dismissing its

foreclosure action against Henry Ruiz based on the Bank's alleg ed failure to comply

with the notice requirements of paragraph twenty-two of the mor tgage. Because the

Bank's letter substantially complied with its notice obligation s under the terms of the

mortgage, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. See G reen Tree

Servicing, LLC v. Milam, 177 So. 3d 7, 13 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015).

Reversed and remanded.

CASANUEVA and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases…Announcing the Renaming of the Bureau of Arms Control, Verification and Compliance to the Bureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and Stability

# 											Announcing the Renaming of the Bureau of Arms Control, Verification and Compliance to the Bureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and Stability									

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

November 13, 2023

Today the Department of State is officially announcing the Bureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and Stability (ADS), the new name of the Bureau of Arms Control, Verification and Compliance. This name change reflects the full scope of this Bureau’s long-standing work and its role in addressing new challenges posed by emerging security technologies and domains. ADS leads Department of State efforts on developing, negotiating, implementing, and verifying compliance with a range of arms control and disarmament agreements and arrangements; extended deterrence; missile defense; confidence- and security-building measures (CSBMs); risk reduction; and crisis communications. Working with others in the Department, ADS has grown its capacity to respond to issues relating to artificial intelligence, biotechnology, and quantum computing. Today, the Bureau is playing a key role in establishing and promoting norms of responsible behavior in outer space, cyberspace, and with artificial intelligence and other emerging technologies. Diplomatic efforts advancing these issues contribute to integrated deterrence, global stability, and international security.

This change reflects a broader effort within the Department to address emerging 21st century national security challenges. While the core functions of ADS remain the same – to use diplomacy to reduce risks and avoid miscalculations – we recognize how we must modernize our approaches and expand our thinking to help build a more stable, peaceful world.

Tags

Arms Control and NonproliferationArtificial IntelligenceBureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and StabilityCyber SecurityInternational SecurityOffice of the SpokespersonStabilizationTechnologyUnder Secretary for Arms Control and International Security

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<PAGE>

<ARTICLE>           5

<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial 
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for P-B Capital Return Futures Fund 3, L.P.
                    and is qualified in its entirety by reference
                    to such financial statements
</LEGEND>

<RESTATED>          

<CIK>               0000857850

<NAME>              P-B Capital Return Futures Fund 3, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>        1

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1996

<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-1-1996

<PERIOD-END>                    Sep-30-1996

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS

<CASH>                          3,384,947

<SECURITIES>                    17,726,849

<RECEIVABLES>                   0

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                21,111,796

<PP&E>                          0

<DEPRECIATION>                  0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  21,111,796

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           929,220

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      20,182,576

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    21,111,796

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                3,245,727

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                2,131,822

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    1,113,905

<EPS-PRIMARY>                   8.59

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1383 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1383

 To amend the formula for determining the Official Mail Allowance for 
     Members of the House of Representatives, and to require that 
unobligated funds in the Official Mail Allowance of Members be used to 
                      reduce the Federal deficit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 4, 1995

 Mr. Hutchinson (for himself, Mr. Inglis of South Carolina, Mr. Canady 
   of Florida, Mr. Hoekstra, Mr. Poshard, Mr. Goss, Mr. Parker, Ms. 
 Danner, Mr. Dickey, Mr. Jacobs, Mr. Wamp, Mr. Hastings of Washington, 
and Mr. Christensen) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                  to the Committee on House Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the formula for determining the Official Mail Allowance for 
     Members of the House of Representatives, and to require that 
unobligated funds in the Official Mail Allowance of Members be used to 
                      reduce the Federal deficit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FORMULA REDUCTION.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 311(e) of the Legislative 
Branch Appropriations Act, 1991 (2 U.S.C. 59e(e)(2)) is amended by 
adding at the end, as a flush sentence, the following:
``The words `3 times the' in clause (i) of subparagraph (B) shall, for 
purposes of applying such subparagraph with respect to--
            ``(i) the session of Congress beginning in January 1996, be 
        deemed to read `1.35 times the';
            ``(ii) the session of Congress beginning in January 1997, 
        be deemed to read `1.2 times the'; and
            ``(iii) any session of Congress thereafter, be deemed to 
        read `the'.
    (b) Technical Amendment.--Clause (i) of section 311(e)(2)(B) of 
such Act is amended by striking ``mail, and'' and inserting ``mail 
(subject to the last sentence of this paragraph), and''.

SEC. 2. DEFICIT REDUCTION.

    Any unobligated funds remaining in the Official Mail Allowance of a 
Member of the House of Representatives at the end of the period of time 
for which they are available for obligation shall be deposited into the 
general fund of the Treasury of the United States and applied toward 
the reduction of the Federal budget deficit.
                                 <all>
```
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 256.31 How does Fiscal Service compute interest on payments?

Fiscal Service computes interest according to the terms of the statute that waives sovereign immunity for interest to be awarded against the Federal government. The statute that allows interest must be cited on the appropriate Judgment Fund form.
§ 34.202 Eligible activities for the Comprehensive Plan Component. The Council may expend funds that are available under the Comprehensive Plan Component for eligible activities under 33 U.S.C. 1321(t)(2) and (3), including the following: ( a ) The Council may expend funds to carry out activities in the Gulf Coast Region that are included in the Comprehensive Plan, as described in 33 U.S.C. 1321(t)(2). An activity selected by the Council is carried out in the Gulf Coast Region when, in the reasonable judgment of the Council, each severable part of the activity is primarily designed to restore or protect that geographic area. The Council must document the basis for its judgment when it selects the activity.
( b ) The Council may expend funds to develop and publish the proposed and initial Comprehensive Plans, and to implement, amend, and update the Comprehensive Plan as required by the Act or as necessary.
( c ) The Council may expend funds to prepare annual reports to Congress, and other reports and audits required by the Act, these regulations, and other Federal law.
( d ) The Council may expend funds to establish and operate one or more advisory committees as may be necessary to assist the Council.
( e ) The Council may expend funds to collect and consider scientific and other research associated with restoration of the Gulf Coast ecosystem, including research, observation, and monitoring.
( f ) Administrative expenses.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Blackhawk Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Todd J.
James, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/Todd J. James
--------------------------------
Todd J. James
Executive Vice President and CFO
May 3, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Blackhawk Bancorp, Inc. and will
be retained by Blackhawk Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 316.13 Reservation as to terms of offer.

The Secretary of the Treasury may at any time, or from time to time, supplement or amend the terms of this offering of bonds, or of any amendments or supplements thereto.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 339.7 Preservation of rights.

The provisions of Treasury Department Circulars Nos. 530, 653, and 905, as currently revised, are hereby modified and amended to the extent that they are not in accordance with this circular. However, nothing contained herein shall limit or restrict rights which owners of Series H bonds received in earlier exchanges have heretofore acquired.
SCWC-12-0000724 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI 

STATE OF HAWAIʻI, 

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, 

vs. 

HERBERT BROWN, 

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant. 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS 

(CAAP-12-0000724; CR. NO. 03-1-0926) 

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI 

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.) 

 

 Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Herbert Brown’s 

Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on December 26, 2015, 

is hereby rejected. 

 DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, February 8, 2016. 

Barry L. Sooalo 

for petitioner 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald 

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack 

/s/ Michael D. Wilson 

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-12-0000724

08-FEB-2016

12:13 PM
TERRY ASHLEY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-5888

_____________________________/

Opinion filed May 1, 2017.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Mark J. Borello, Judge.

Terry Ashley, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Bryan Jordan, Senior Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., MAKAR and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

###### Editorial Note on Part 353

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 353 appear at 79 FR 8859, Feb. 14, 2014.

#### § 353.86 Reissue upon termination of investment agency.

A bond registered in the name of a financial institution, or individual, as agent for investment purposes only, under an agreement with a religious, an educational, a charitable, or a nonprofit organization, may be reissued in the name of the organization upon termination of the agency. The former agent should request such reissue and should certify that the organization is entitled by reason of the termination of the agency. If such request and certification are not obtainable, the bond will be reissued in the name of the organization upon its own request, supported by satisfactory evidence of the termination of the agency. The appropriate form should be used.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                                         2787
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2787
<PP&E>                                         49764
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 52551
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          92904
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       4460
<OTHER-SE>                                     (44813)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   52551
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               4967
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4967)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4967)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4967)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.0)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.0)



</TABLE>
#### § 16.25 Fees.

The party requesting a subpoena shall pay the cost of the fees and mileage of any witness subpoenaed in the amounts that would be payable to a witness in a proceeding in United States District Court. A check for witness fees and mileage shall accompany the subpoena when served, except that when a subpoena is issued on behalf of the authority, a check for witness fees and mileage need not accompany the subpoena.