Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 158 / Tuesday, August 18, 2009 / Notices 41689 

Reporting 

Under previous IHAs, CALTRANS 

submitted weekly marine mammal 

monitoring reports for the time when 

pile driving was commenced. In August 

2006, CALTRANS submitted its 

Hydroacoustic Measurement at Piers T1 

and E2 report. This report is available 

by contacting NMFS (see ADDRESSES) or 

on the Web at http://biomitigation.org. 

Under the proposed IHA, 

coordination with NMFS will occur on 

a weekly basis. During periods with 

open-water pile driving activity, weekly 

monitoring reports will be made 

available to NMFS and the public at 

http://biomitigation.org. These weekly 

reports will include a summary of the 

previous week monitoring activities and 

an estimate of the number of seals and 

sea lions that may have been disturbed 

as a result of pile driving activities. 

In addition, CALTRANS will to 

provide NMFS’ Southwest Regional 

Administrator with a draft final report 

within 90 days after completion of the 

westbound Skyway contract and 90 

days after completion of the Suspension 

Span foundations contract. This report 

should detail the monitoring protocol, 

summarize the data recorded during 

monitoring, and estimate the number of 

marine mammals that may have been 

harassed due to pile driving. If no 

comments are received from NMFS 

Southwest Regional Administrator 

within 30 days, the draft final report 

will be considered the final report. If 

comments are received, a final report 

must be submitted within 30 days after 

receipt of comments. 

National Environmental Policy Act 

(NEPA) 

NMFS prepared an Environmental 

Assessment (EA) for the take of marine 

mammals incidental to construction of 

the East Span of the SF-OBB and made 

a Finding of No Significant Impact 

(FONSI) on November 4, 2003. Due to 

the modification of part of the 

construction project and the mitigation 

measures, NMFS reviewed additional 

information from CALTRANS regarding 

empirical measurements of pile driving 

noises for the smaller temporary piles 

without an air bubble curtain system 

and the use of vibratory pile driving. 

NMFS prepared a Supplemental 

Environmental Assessment (SEA) and 

analyzed the potential impacts to 

marine mammals that would result from 

the modification of the action. A 

Finding of No Significant Impact 

(FONSI) was signed on August 5, 2009. 

A copy of the SEA and FONSI is 

available upon request (see ADDRESSES). 

Endangered Species Act (ESA) 

On October 30, 2001, NMFS 

completed consultation under section 7 

of the ESA with the Federal Highway 

Administration (FHWA) on the 

CALTRANS’ construction of a 

replacement bridge for the East Span of 

the SF-OBB in California. Anadromous 

salmonids are the only listed species 

which may be affected by the project. 

The finding contained in the Biological 

Opinion was that the proposed action at 

the East Span of the SF-OBB is not 

likely to jeopardize the continued 

existence of listed anadromous 

salmonids, or result in the destruction 

or adverse modification of designated 

critical habitat for these species. Listed 

marine mammals are not expected to be 

in the area of the action and thus would 

not be affected. 

NMFS proposed issuance of an IHA to 

CALTRANS constitutes an agency 

action that authorizes an activity that 

may affect ESA-listed species and, 

therefore, is subject to section 7 of the 

ESA. The effects of the activities on 

listed salmonids were analyzed during 

consultation between the FHWA and 

NMFS, and the underlying action has 

not changed from that considered in the 

consultation. Therefore, the effects 

discussion contained in the Biological 

Opinion issued to the FHWA on 

October 30, 2001, pertains also to this 

action. NMFS has determined that 

issuance of an IHA for this activity does 

not lead to any effects on listed species 

apart from those that were considered in 

the consultation on FHWA’s action. 

Determinations 

For the reasons discussed in this 

document and in previously identified 

supporting documents, NMFS has 

preliminarily determined that the 

impact of pile driving and other 

activities associated with construction 

of the East Span Project should result, 

at worst, in the Level B harassment of 

small numbers of California sea lions, 

Pacific harbor seals, harbor porpoises, 

and potentially gray whales that inhabit 

or visit SFB in general and the vicinity 

of the SF-OBB in particular. While 

behavioral modifications, including 

temporarily vacating the area around the 

construction site, may be made by these 

species to avoid the resultant visual and 

acoustic disturbance, the availability of 

alternate areas within SFB and haul-out 

sites (including pupping sites) and 

feeding areas within the Bay has led 

NMFS to determine that this action will 

have a negligible impact on California 

sea lion, Pacific harbor seal, harbor 

porpoises, and gray whale populations 

along the California coast. 

In addition, no take by Level A 

harassment (injury) or death is 

anticipated and harassment takes 

should be at the lowest level practicable 

due to incorporation of the mitigation 

measures mentioned previously in this 

document. The activity will not have an 

unmitigable adverse impact on 

subsistence uses of marine mammals 

described in MMPA section 

101(a)(5)(D)(i)(II). 

Authorization 

NMFS has issued an IHA to 

CALTRANS for the potential 

harassment of small numbers of harbor 

seals, California sea lions, harbor 

porpoises, and gray whales incidental to 

construction of a replacement bridge for 

the East Span of the San FrancisoOakland Bay Bridge in California, 

provided the previously mentioned 

mitigation, monitoring, and reporting 

requirements are incorporated. 

Dated: August 12, 2009. 

James H. Lecky, 

Director, Office of Protected Resources, 

National Marine Fisheries Service. 

[FR Doc. E9–19771 Filed 8–17–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–22–S 

COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER 

SUPERVISION AGENCY 

Privacy Act of 1974; System of 

Records; Notice 

AGENCY: Court Services and Offender 

Supervision Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

Authority: The Privacy Act of 1974 (5 

U.S.C. 552a) and Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) Circular No. A–130. 

SUMMARY: CSOSA is proposing to 

establish blanket routine uses in order 

to: (1) Better meet our agency mission, 

particularly to increase public safety, 

prevent crime, and reduce recidivism by 

enhancing information sharing with our 

law enforcement partners; and (2) lessen 

the administrative burden on CSOSA by 

reducing the number of single requests 

for information from our law 

enforcement partners. 

Unless indicated otherwise by another 

public notice, these blanket routine uses 

will apply to following CSOSA systems 

of records: 

CSOSA–9 Supervision Offender Case File 

CSOSA–11 Supervision & Management 

Automated Record Tracking 

DATES: CSOSA must forward this Notice 

to the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) ten (10) days before CSOSA 

submits the Notice to the Federal 

Register. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
41690 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 158 / Tuesday, August 18, 2009 / Notices 

CSOSA must receive public 

comments on or before September 17, 

2009. 

This Notice will be effective October 

1, 2009 unless public comments are 

received that warrant a contrary 

determination. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments to CSOSA, 

Office of the General Counsel, 633 

Indiana Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 

20004. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Rorey Smith, Assistant General Counsel, 

202–220–5797. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None. 

CSOSA Blanket Routine Uses 

Subject: Blanket Routines Uses 

Applicable to More than One CSOSA 

Privacy Act System of Records. 

Applicability: The following routine 

uses describe those types of disclosures 

which are common to more than one 

CSOSA Privacy Act system of records 

for which CSOSA is establishing as 

‘‘blanket’’ routine uses. These blanket 

routine uses supplement but do not 

replace any routine uses that are 

separately published in the notices of 

individual record systems to which the 

blanket routine uses apply. 

Routine Uses of Records Maintained 

in CSOSA Systems, Including Categories 

of Users and the Purposes of Such Uses: 

System records may be disclosed to the 

following persons or entities under the 

circumstances or for the purposes 

described below to the extent such 

disclosures are compatible with the 

purposes for which the information was 

collected. 

CSOSA–9 (Supervision Offender Case 

File) 

A. To any civil or criminal law 

enforcement agency, whether Federal, 

State, or local or foreign, which requires 

information relevant to a civil or 

criminal investigation to the extent 

necessary to accomplish their assigned 

duties unless prohibited by law or 

regulation. 

B. To a Federal, State, local, foreign, 

or international law enforcement agency 

to assist in the general crime prevention 

and detection efforts of the recipient 

agency or to provide investigative leads 

to such agency. 

C. To the appropriate Federal, State, 

local, foreign or other public authority 

responsible for investigating, 

prosecuting, enforcing or implementing 

a statute, rule, regulation, or order 

where CSOSA becomes aware of an 

indication of a violation or potential 

violation of civil or criminal law or 

regulation unless prohibited by law or 

regulation. 

CSOSA–11 (Supervision & Management 

Automated Record Tracking) 

A. To any civil or criminal law 

enforcement agency, whether Federal, 

State, or local or foreign, which requires 

information relevant to a civil or 

criminal investigation to the extent 

necessary to accomplish their assigned 

duties. 

B. To the appropriate Federal, State, 

local, foreign or other public authority 

responsible for investigating, 

prosecuting, enforcing or implementing 

a statute, rule, regulation, or order 

where CSOSA becomes aware of an 

indication of a violation or potential 

violation of civil or criminal law or 

regulation. 

C. To a Federal, State, local, foreign, 

or international law enforcement agency 

to assist in the general crime prevention 

and detection efforts of the recipient 

agency or to provide investigative leads 

to such agency. 

D. To Federal, State, and local 

authorities participating in the JUSTIS 

database system through database access 

to limited information to permit a 

determination of an individual’s status 

under-supervision and the assigned 

supervision officer to the extent 

necessary for the accomplishment of the 

participating authorities’ assigned 

duties. 

The participants in the JUSTIS 

database that will have limited access to 

CSOSA’s SMART information are the 

Federal Bureau of Prisons, the DC 

Department of Corrections, the DC 

Superior Court, the Metropolitan Police 

Department, the DC Pretrial Services 

Agency, the United States Attorney’s 

Office for the District of Columbia, the 

United States Marshals Service, and the 

United States Parole Commission. 

CSOSA Records Systems to Which 

These Blanket Routine Uses Do Not 

Apply: These blanket routine uses shall 

not apply to the following CSOSA 

Privacy Act systems of records. Only 

those routine uses established in the 

records system notice for the particular 

system shall apply. 

CSOSA–1—Public Affairs File 

CSOSA–2—Background Investigation 

CSOSA–3—Employee Credential System 

CSOSA–4—Proximity Card System 

CSOSA–5—Budget System 

CSOSA–6—Payroll and Leave Records 

CSOSA–7—Time and Attendance Records 

CSOSA–8—Training Management System 

CSOSA–10—Pre-sentence Investigations 

CSOSA–12—Recidivism Tracking Database 

CSOSA–13—Freedom of Information-Privacy 

Act System 

CSOSA–15—Substance Abuse Treatment 

Database 

CSOSA–16—Screener Database 

CSOSA–17—Office of Professional 

Responsibility Record 

CSOSA–18—Sex Offender Registry 

CSOSA–19 —Drug Free Workplace Program 

Dated: August 10, 2009. 

Patricia A. Capers, 

Records Manager. 

[FR Doc. E9–19739 Filed 8–17–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3129–04–P 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

Notice of Proposed Information 

Collection Requests 

AGENCY: Department of Education. 

SUMMARY: The Director, Information 

Collection Clearance Division, 

Regulatory Information Management 

Services, Office of Management, invites 

comments on the proposed information 

collection requests as required by the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

DATES: Interested persons are invited to 

submit comments on or before October 

19, 2009. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 

3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 

1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires 

that the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) provide interested 

Federal agencies and the public an early 

opportunity to comment on information 

collection requests. OMB may amend or 

waive the requirement for public 

consultation to the extent that public 

participation in the approval process 

would defeat the purpose of the 

information collection, violate State or 

Federal law, or substantially interfere 

with any agency’s ability to perform its 

statutory obligations. The Director, 

Information Collection Clearance 

Division, Regulatory Information 

Management Services, Office of 

Management, publishes that notice 

containing proposed information 

collection requests prior to submission 

of these requests to OMB. Each 

proposed information collection, 

grouped by office, contains the 

following: (1) Type of review requested, 

e.g., new, revision, extension, existing 

or reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) Summary 

of the collection; (4) Description of the 

need for, and proposed use of, the 

information; (5) Respondents and 

frequency of collection; and (6) 

Reporting and/or Recordkeeping 

burden. OMB invites public comment. 

The Department of Education is 

especially interested in public comment 

addressing the following issues: (1) Is 

this collection necessary to the proper 

functions of the Department; (2) will 

this information be processed and used 

in a timely manner; (3) is the estimate 

of burden accurate; (4) how might the 

Department enhance the quality, utility, 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES