alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
39927.

#### STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT v. KING.

Decided January 16, 1963.

*Eugene Cook, Attorney General, Carter Goode, Richard L. Chambers, Assistant Attorneys General, Ernest McDonald,*for plaintiff in error.

*McCamy, Minor ■& Vining, Carlton McCamy,*contra.

Eberhardt, Judge.

The State Highway Department selected John Planzer as its assessor in a condemnation proceeding against J. E. King. Two> other assessors were regularly selected, and after hearing evidence as contemplated by the three-assessor *221statute. Planzer joined with the others in making an award of $12,500 for the lands taken and for consequential damages. On appeal to a jury in the superior court Planzer was called as a witness and he testified that in his opinion the consequential damages amounted to approximately $50,000. The condemnor offered in evidence the oath which the witness had signed as an assessor “to do equal and exact justice between the parties according to law” *(Code*§ 36-403), and his signature to the award of $12,500 for the purpose of impeachment. Planzer testified, in explanation, “Well, I would like to make it clear on that, if the court will allow me. On that particular thing there, I was of the opinion at the time that [the award] was signed, that that was satisfactory to [the condemnee] or I would not have signed it. I was down there representing the State and I was sent down there by the State and not by Mr. King or anyone else, other than the State.”

Planzer did not *testify*before the assessors when the hearing was held. Rather, it appears that when the other assessors were willing to make an award of $12,500, he, feeling it his duty as an assessor for the State to hold the award down rather than to try to raise it in amount, readily agreed to and did join with them. He may have had an erroneous concept of his duty, but nothing here indicates any wilful or conscious purpose on the part of Planzer to give false testimony on the trial before the jury or that he had at any time previously testified in the same case to a state of facts contradictory to his testimony upon the present trial. Thus, we find no error in the failure of the court, without request, to charge relative to the matter of a witness who swears “wilfully and knowingly falsely” as provided in *Code*§ 38-1806. *Smaha v. George,*195 Ga. 412 (24 SE2d 385).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Felton, C. J., and Russell, J., concur.*
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 321.24 Claims on account of lost securities.

If a security redeemed by an agent is lost, stolen or destroyed while in its custody or in transit prior to settlement, the agent's claim for reimbursement of the missing security's redemption value on the original payment date will be considered, provided the security can be identified by serial number.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       3,597,943
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  620,489
<ALLOWANCES>                                    67,743
<INVENTORY>                                    619,818
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,682,405
<PP&E>                                         576,278
<DEPRECIATION>                                 316,997
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,288,076
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          898,962
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         19
<COMMON>                                         9,093
<OTHER-SE>                                      76,905
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   528,807
<SALES>                                      1,497,223
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,497,223
<CGS>                                        1,078,854
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,148,478
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,096,729
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             153,138
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,150,006
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,150,006
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,150,006
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                5,318,992
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

###### Editorial Note on Part 353

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 353 appear at 79 FR 8859, Feb. 14, 2014.

#### § 353.85 Reissue in name of trustee or agent for reinvestment purposes.

A bond registered in the name of a religious, educational, charitable or nonprofit organization, whether or not incorporated, may be reissued in the name of a financial institution, or an individual, as trustee or agent. There must be an agreement between the organization and the trustee or agent holding funds of the organization, in whole or in part, for the purpose of investing and reinvesting the principal and paying the income to the organization. Reissue should be requested on behalf of the organization by an authorized officer using the appropriate form.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 159 (Wednesday, August 19, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 41907]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19902]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreements Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may 
submit comments on the agreements to the Secretary, Federal Maritime 
Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within ten days of the date this 
notice appears in the Federal Register. Copies of the agreements are 
available through the Commission's Web site (www.fmc.gov) or by 
contacting the Office of Agreements at (202) 523-5793 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dda9afbcb9b8bcb3bcb1a4aeb4ae9dbbb0bef3bab2ab"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="057177646160646b64697c766c76456368662b626a73">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Agreement No.: 012036-001.
    Title: Maersk Line/MSC TP5 Space Charter Agreement.
    Parties: A.P. Moeller-Maersk A/S and Mediterranean Shipping Company 
S.A.
    Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; Sher & Blackwell LLP; 1850 M 
Street, NW., Suite 900; Washington, DC 20036.
    Synopsis: The amendment adds the People's Republic of China to the 
geographic scope of the agreement and adds the consent of Maersk Line 
to certain sub-chartering of space by MSC.

    Agreement No.: 012075.
    Title: MSC/CMA CGM North Europe-U.S. Atlantic and Gulf Vessel 
Sharing Agreement.
    Parties: CMA CGM S.A. and Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A.
    Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; Sher & Blackwell LLP; 1850 M 
Street, NW., Suite 900; Washington, DC 20036.
    Synopsis: The agreement authorizes the parties to share vessel 
space in the trades between U.S. Atlantic Coast and Gulf Coast ports 
and ports in North Europe, the Bahamas, and on the Caribbean Coast of 
Mexico.

    By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.
Karen V. Gregory,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-19902 Filed 8-18-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### THE YAZOO AND MISSISSIPPI VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES.

[No. 31134.

Decided December 7, 1914.]

*On the Proofs.*

Where the statute directs a method of ascertaining the average weight of mail carried and prescribes a maximum compensation therefor, the Postmaster General can pay less, but not more, than the maximum fixed by the statute. This case, being similar, is controlled by the principles announced in the *Chicago & Alton case,*49 0. Cls., 463.

*The Reporter's*statement of the case:

The facts in this case are the same as the facts found by the court in the *Chicago c& Alton case,*49 C. Cls., 463.

*Messrs. Alex.*Britton, *John 8.*Barbour, and *8. A. Put-man*for the plaintiff. *Mr. R. Walton Moore*and *Britton <& Gray*were on the briefs.

*Mr. Assistant Attorney General Huston Thompson*and *Mr. Joseph Stewart*(Second Assistant Postmaster-General) for the defendants.

Campbell, *Chief*Justice,

delivered the opinion of the court:

This case is controlled by the same principles which govern the *Chicago & Alton case.*

The claimant contends that it is not bound by the terms of the *“*distance circular ” sent out by the Postmaster General. It hence follows that any right of recovery rests either upon the ground that the law fixes the compensation to which it is entitled for carrying the mails or upon the ground that it is entitled to reasonable compensation for the services rendered in said matter. We may dismiss the last suggestion because, aside from any other consideration, the record does not disclose evidence upon which the court could proceed in that regard. We do not think that the statute fixed a rate of compensation absolutely; but, on the contrary, we think the statute directed a method of ascertaining the average weight of mail carried and prescribed a maximum price which the Postmaster General was authorized to pay *16for the carriage of the average weights of mails ascertained according to the provisions of the statute. The Postmaster General could pay less, but not more, than the maximum fixed by law. The railroad company could refuse to agree to the Postmaster General’s proposals, but a mere protest was not sufficient.

The petition will be dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of JACOBS  FINANCIAL  GROUP,  INC. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended  February 28, 2010 (the  "Report")
filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission,  I, John M. Jacobs,  Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Company's  Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



Date: May 27, 2010


                      /s/John M. Jacobs
                      --------------------------------------------
                      John M. Jacobs,  Chief Executive Officer and
                      Chief Financial Officer
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Assistant Secretary O’Brien’s Travel to Azerbaijan and Romania

# 									Assistant Secretary O’Brien’s Travel to Azerbaijan and Romania							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

December 4, 2023

Assistant Secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs James C. O’Brien will travel to Baku, Azerbaijan and Bucharest and Tulcea, Romania, December 6-8.  While in Baku, the Assistant Secretary will meet with Azerbaijani officials on strengthening bilateral relations and supporting the peace between Azerbaijan and Armenia.  In Romania, Assistant Secretary O’Brien will participate in a summit on grain exports alongside high-level officials from Romania, Ukraine, Moldova, and the European Commission, and will discuss issues of mutual interest in our strong bilateral relationship with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

Tags

AzerbaijanBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial International TravelRomania

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
HomeKey Topics – Office of Overseas Schools...Assisted Schools

# 						Assisted Schools					

							The U.S. Department of State provides assistance to overseas schools through direct and indirect support programs designed to promote an American-style program.						

191 items
Clear All Filters

## View collection by:

Select a Year20242023

Select a MonthJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Select a LocationAlbaniaAlgeriaAngolaArgentinaArmeniaArubaAustriaAzerbaijanBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBeninBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBotswanaBrazilBulgariaBurkina FasoBurmaCambodiaCameroonChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCuracaoCzech RepublicCôte d'IvoireDemocratic Republic of the CongoDenmarkDjiboutiDominican RepublicEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEstoniaEswatiniEthiopiaFijiFinlandFranceGeorgiaGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuineaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHungaryIcelandIndiaIndonesiaIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKosovoKyrgyzstanLaosLatviaLebanonLesothoLiberiaLithuaniaMadagascarMalawiMalaysiaMaliMaltaMauritaniaMexicoMoldovaMongoliaMontenegroMoroccoMozambiqueNamibiaNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigerNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorwayOmanPakistanPanamaParaguayPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalQatarRomaniaRwandaSaudi ArabiaSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSlovakiaSouth AfricaSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenTaiwanTajikistanTanzaniaThailandThe BahamasThe GambiaTimor-LesteTrinidad and TobagoTunisiaTurkeyTurkmenistanUgandaUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited KingdomUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamZambiaZimbabwe

Select a Release TypeOverseas Schools Fact Sheet

Select a Bureau/OfficeOffice of Overseas Schools

          -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire: International Community School of Abidjan: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  October 4, 2023 
          -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Abu Dhabi, UAE: American Community School of Abu Dhabi: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  October 4, 2023 
          -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Abuja, Nigeria: American International School of Abuja: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  October 4, 2023 
          -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Accra, Ghana: Lincoln Community School Accra: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  October 4, 2023 
          -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: International Community School of Addis Ababa: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  October 4, 2023 
          -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Alexandria, Egypt: Schutz American School: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  October 4, 2023 
          -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Algiers, Algeria: American International School of Algiers: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  October 5, 2023 
          -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Almaty, Kazakhstan: QSI International School of Almaty: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  October 5, 2023 
          -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Amman, Jordan: American Community School: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  October 5, 2023 
          -    Overseas Schools Fact Sheet  		Amsterdam, Netherlands: The International School of Amsterdam: 2023-2024 Fact Sheet	  March 6, 2023 

123…20next page

Back to Top
HomeActions to Impose Additional Visa Restrictions in Response to Anti-Democratic Actions in Guatemala

# 									Actions to Impose Additional Visa Restrictions in Response to Anti-Democratic Actions in Guatemala							

Press Statement

Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson

November 16, 2023

The United States stands with those seeking to safeguard democracy and rule of law in Guatemala.  Under Section 212(a)(3)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, we are taking steps to impose visa restrictions on eleven individuals for undermining democracy and the rule of law.  This brings the total recent visa restrictions imposed under this authority to 25, and the United States will continue to take steps to impose such restrictions on additional individuals who continue to undermine Guatemala’s democracy.

The United States unequivocally rejects continued, brazen efforts to undermine Guatemala’s peaceful transition of power to President-elect Bernardo Arévalo.  This includes Public Ministry officials’ plans to file charges against President-elect Arevalo and Vice President-elect Herrera, as well as members of the Semilla party and other opposition members.  We also condemn the politically motivated raids and arrests targeting members of the Semilla party.

These repeated and egregious anti-democratic acts undermine Guatemala’s democratic institutions and threaten the stability of Guatemala and the region as a whole.  We join the Organization of American States in calling for a transfer of power that respects popular will, is consistent with the Inter-American Democratic Charter, and adheres to the rule of law in Guatemala.  The Guatemalan people have spoken.  Their voices must be respected.

Tags

DemocracyGuatemalaHuman RightsHuman Rights and DemocracyRule of LawVisas

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
Exhibit 10.3

 



 

August 16, 2012

 

John Cooley

FX Alliance Inc.

909 Third Avenue

10th Floor

New York, New York 10022

 

Dear John:

 

FXall has made some commitments to you about bonuses, and we want to put them in writing. In recognition of your achievements in the first half of 2012 and continued commitment towards helping FXall reach its objectives, I am very pleased to advise you of the following:

 

·                  You will be entitled to receive a discretionary bonus for the calendar year 2012 of $800,000 (USD) (the “Discretionary Target Bonus”), as more fully described in the bullets below.

 

·                  The bonus described in this letter will be paid to you on or before the 50th day following the Closing Date (as defined in the Agreement and Plan of Merger with Thomson Reuters Corporation and certain of its subsidiaries) (the “Payment Date”).

 

·                  To be eligible to receive the bonus described in this letter, you must remain an employee in good standing and have not tendered your resignation on or prior to the Payment Date. However, if you are terminated as a direct consequence of the merger agreement between FXall and Thomson Reuters (i.e., not because of performance or for cause) prior to the Payment Date, you will receive $800,000 (USD) in the first practical payroll after your last date of employment.

 

·                  In the event of your termination in circumstances which would give rise to severance benefits under your Employment Agreement, as amended (your “Employment Agreement”), that, in part, contemplate payment of a pro-rata portion of your 2012 bonus, then payment of the full Discretionary Target Bonus as contemplated above shall be deemed to have satisfied the payment of such pro-rata portion of your 2012 bonus. For the avoidance of doubt, benefits that contemplate payment of a pro-rata 

 











 

portion of your 2012 bonus include the payments contemplated in Section 6.f.(ii)(B) and in Section 6.f.(iv)(D) of your Employment Agreement.

 

Once again, thank you for all your accomplishments and your contribution in building FXall to the company it is today.

 

 

	
Regards,
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ Philip Weisberg
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Philip   Weisberg, CEO
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
AGREED   TO AND ACKNOWLEDGED:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/   John W. Cooley
    	
 
    
	
John   W. Cooley
§ 23.41 Compliance reviews. ( a ) Treasury may conduct compliance reviews and pre-award reviews or use other similar procedures that will permit it to investigate and correct violations of the Act and these regulations. Treasury may conduct these reviews even in the absence of a complaint against a recipient. The reviews may be as comprehensive as necessary to determine whether a violation of the Act or these regulations has occurred.
( b ) If a compliance review or pre-award review indicates a violation of the Act or these regulations, Treasury will attempt to achieve voluntary compliance. If voluntary compliance cannot be achieved, Treasury will arrange for enforcement as described in § 23.46.
#### § 30.13 Q-13: What actions are necessary for a TARP recipient to comply with section 111(e) of EESA (the shareholder resolution on executive compensation requirement)?

As provided in section 111(e) of EESA, any proxy or consent or authorization for an annual or other meeting of the shareholders of any TARP recipient that occurs during the TARP period must permit a separate shareholder vote to approve the compensation of executives, as required to be disclosed pursuant to the Federal securities laws (including the compensation discussion and analysis, the compensation tables, and any related material). To meet this standard, a TARP recipient must comply with any rules, regulations, or guidance promulgated by the SEC that are applicable to the TARP recipient.

[74 FR 63992, Dec. 7, 2009]