alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In the Matter of: 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENTOF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

Served: March 1, 2012 

FAA Docket No. (TO BE ASSIGNED) 

FDMS No. FAA 2011-1109 

Administrative Law Judge: J. E. Sullivan 

QUENTON T. BROWN 

NOTICE OF PROPOSED MOTION TO RESOLVE CASE 

COMES NOW the Complainant in this matter, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), by 

and through its Regional Counsel for the Central Region, and pursuant to Order Granting Motion to 

Deem Allegations Admitted and Granting Other Relief, issued by Administrative Law Judge J.E. 

Sullivan on February 2, 2012, hereby gives notice that the undersigned intends to file a Motion for 

Default Judgment on March 1, 2012, for the purpose of resolving this case. 

Dated this 29th day of February 2012. 

Respectfully submitted, 

A. Lester Haizlip 

R gi nal Couns;J-<~ .... ~ 

·~jLf / 

~v~~ 

1

1 

~:i~rGE~:~:~nt Attorney 

. Federal Aviation Administration 

901 Locust Street, Room 506 

Kansas City, MO 64106 

(816) 329-3765; Fax (816) 329-3771 

ATTORNEY FOR COMPLAINANT 

RECEIVED 

_ MAR -7 2012 

HEARING DOCKET 
Quenton T. Brown FDMS No. FAA 2011-1109 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have this date placed in the United States mail, postage prepaid, a copy of 

NOTICE OF PROPOSED MOTION TO RESOLVE CASE addressed to: 

Quenton T. Brown 

2440 Woodwind Trail 

MelboUine, FL 32953 

Quenton T. Brown 

622 W. Miller St.l'eet 

Orlando, Florida 32805-4502 

I hereby certify that I have this date provided a copy, via facsimile transmission, and placed in the 

United States mail, postage prepaid, a copy, addressed to: 

The Honorable J. E. Sullivan 

Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

FAX: (202) 366-7536 

I hereby certify that I have this date placed in the United States mail, postage prepaid, the 

original and 1 copy addressed to: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

ATTN: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building, Suite 2Wl 000 

Dated this 29th day of February 2012. 

/ 1/l!!lfi:-Pc:Z~' !Jark Camacho -

1 enior Enforcement Attorney
§ 15.737-28 Notice of disciplinary action. ( a ) Upon the issuance of a final order suspending a former officer or employee from practice before the Department or a separate statutory agency thereof, the Director shall give notice thereof to appropriate officers and employees of the Department. Officers and employees of the Department shall refuse to participate in any appearance by such former officer or employee or to accept any communication which constitutes the prohibited practice before the Department or separate statutory agency thereof during the period of suspension.
( b ) The Director shall take other appropriate disciplinary action as may be required by the final order.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1143 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1143

    To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to witness 
                              retaliation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 1995

   Mr. Fox of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to witness 
                              retaliation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 1513 of 
title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
    ``(c) If the retaliation occurred because of attendance at or 
testimony in a criminal case, the maximum term of imprisonment which 
may be imposed for the offense under this section shall be the higher 
of that otherwise provided by law or the maximum term that could have 
been imposed for any offense charged in such case.''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 12.1****GTECH HOLDINGS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES****COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**           (Unaudited)   Three Months Ended   May 27,  May 28,   2006  2005   (Dollars in thousands) Earnings:        Income before income taxes $72,364  $85,694 Add:        Interest on indebtedness  7,453   7,265 Equity income, net of distributions  266   (1,787)Minority losses  720   1,309 Portion of rents representative of the interest factor  288   315 Amortization of capitalized interest  195   199        Earnings available for fixed charges $81,286  $92,995                 Fixed charges:        Interest on indebtedness  7,453   7,265 Portion of rents representative of the interest factor  288   315 Capitalized interest  369   —        Total fixed charges $8,110  $7,580                 Ratio of earnings to fixed charges  10.02   12.27
§ 31.3306(c)(6)-1 Services in employ of United States or instrumentality thereof. ( a ) *Services in employ of United States or wholly-owned instrumentality thereof.* Services performed in the employ of the United States Government, except as provided in section 3306(n) (see § 31.3306(n)-1), are excepted from employment. Services performed in the employ of an instrumentality of the United States which is wholly owned by the United States also are excepted from employment.
( b ) *Services in employ of instrumentality not wholly owned by United States* — ( 1 ) *Services performed after 1961.* Services performed after 1961 in the employ of an instrumentality of the United States which is partially owned by the United States are excepted from employment, if the remuneration for such service is paid after 1961. Services performed after 1961 in the employ of an instrumentality of the United States which is neither wholly owned nor partially owned by the United States are excepted from employment if ( i ) the instrumentality is exempt from the tax imposed by section 3301 by virtue of any provision of law which specifically refers to section 3301 or the corresponding section of prior law in granting exemption from such tax, and
( ii ) the remuneration for such service is paid after 1961. For provisions which make general exemptions from Federal taxation ineffectual as to the tax imposed by section 3301, see § 31.3308-1.
( 2 ) *Services performed before 1962.* Services performed in the employ of an instrumentality of the United States which is not wholly owned by the United States are excepted from employment if the instrumentality is exempt from the tax imposed by section 3301 by virtue of any other provision of law, and ( i ) the services are performed before 1962 or
( ii ) remuneration for the services is paid before 1962.
[T.D. 6658, 28 FR 6638, June 27, 1963]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF WORLDPORT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,068
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,963
<ALLOWANCES>                                       280
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,914
<PP&E>                                           1,237
<DEPRECIATION>                                     337
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 108,998
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          153,622
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                     (50,694)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   108,998
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                65,263
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   44,860
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                41,459
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   295
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              44,190
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (95,501)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (94,656)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (94,656)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (4.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (4.26)


</TABLE>
- Office Home
- About Us
- Key Topics

HomeOffice of Cooperative Threat Reduction...About Us – Office of Cooperative Threat Reduction

# 									About Us – Office of Cooperative Threat Reduction							

The Office of Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) is funded by the nonproliferation, anti-terrorism, demining and related programs (NADR) account, and manages the Global Threat Reduction program. CTR efforts include disrupting the funding, transport, and acquisition of WMD material, technology, and expertise by proliferator states such as China, DPRK, Iran, Russia, and Syria, as well as preventing WMD attacks by ISIS and other terrorist actors.

Back to Top
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SHANG ZHE PIAO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 10-70568

Agency No. A098-660-735

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 17, 2012** 

Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Shang Zhe Piao, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen

removal proceedings based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We have

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of

FILED

JUL 24 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-70568

a motion to reopen, and review de novo claims of due process violations.

Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir. 2003). We deny the petition for

review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Piao’s motion to reopen on

the ground that he presented insufficient evidence to establish prejudice resulting

from the alleged errors of his former counsel. See id at 900-02 (requiring prejudice

to prevail on an ineffective assistance claim). 

In light of our disposition, we need not address Piao’s remaining contention

that the BIA erred in requiring him to comply with Matter of Lozada, 19 I. & N.

Dec. 637 (BIA 1988).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Presidential Documents

41325 

Federal Register 

Vol. 74, No. 156 

Friday, August 14, 2009 

Title 3— 

The President 

Notice of August 13, 2009 

Continuation of Emergency Regarding Export Control Regulations 

On August 17, 2001, consistent with the authority provided to the President 

under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 

et seq.), the President issued Executive Order 13222. In that order, he declared 

a national emergency with respect to the unusual and extraordinary threat 

to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States 

in light of the expiration of the Export Administration Act of 1979, as 

amended (50 U.S.C. App. 2401 et seq.). Because the Export Administration 

Act has not been renewed by the Congress, the national emergency declared 

on August 17, 2001, must continue in effect beyond August 17, 2009. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act 

(50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency 

declared in Executive Order 13222. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to 

the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

August 13, 2009. [FR Doc. E9–19775 

Filed 8–13–09; 1:30 pm] 

Billing code 3195–W9–P 


mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PRESDOCO0OB#1.EPS</GPH>
EXHIBIT 10.19(b)

2007 AMENDMENT TO
 EMISPHERE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 2002 BROADBASED STOCK OPTION PLAN

          The Board amends the Plan, effective February 12, 2007, as follows:

          Section 12(a) is hereby amended by replacing the current text with the following text:

          Changes in Capitalization.  The number of shares of Common Stock covered by each outstanding Option, and the number of shares of Common Stock which have been authorized for issuance under the Plan but as to which no Options have yet been granted or which have been returned to the Plan upon cancellation or expiration of an Option, as well as the price per share of Common Stock covered by each such outstanding Option, shall be proportionately adjusted for any increase or decrease in the number of issued shares of Common Stock resulting from a stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividend, combination or reclassification of the Common Stock, or any other increase or decrease in the number of issued shares of Common Stock effected without receipt of consideration by the Company; provided, however, that conversion of any convertible securities of the Company shall not be deemed
to have been “effected without receipt of consideration.”  All such adjustments shall be made by the Administrator and effected in a manner that precludes the enlargement of rights and benefits under the Options.  Except as expressly provided herein, no issuance by the Company of shares of stock of any class, or securities convertible into shares of stock of any class, shall affect, and no adjustment by reason thereof shall be made with respect to, the number or price of shares of Common Stock subject to an Option.
#### § 48.4062(b)-1 Rebuilt parts or accessories sold on an exchange basis.

The sale price of a rebuilt part or accessory on which the tax is to be computed shall not include the value of a like part or accessory accepted in exchange. The total amount charged in excess of the amount allowed for a like article accepted in an exchange will be the basis for tax. For example, if a rebuilt automobile engine is sold for $100, plus another automobile engine, the tax on the rebuilt engine will be computed on the basis of $100.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                           GTECH HOLDINGS CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GTECH Holdings Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 24, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the Date hereof (the "Report"), I, W.
Bruce Turner, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C section 1350, as adopted pursuant to sections 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.

                                    GTECH HOLDINGS CORPORATION

Date: July 3, 2003                  By /s/ W. Bruce Turner
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    W. Bruce Turner
                                    President and Chief Executive Officer
#### §§ 1028.310-1028.320 [Reserved]
# L_2020317DE.01004001.xml

| 1.10.2020 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 317/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.10.2020

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 317/40

---

Berichtigung der Delegierten Verordnung (EU) 2019/2018 der Kommission vom 11. März 2019 zur Ergänzung der Verordnung (EU) 2017/1369 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates im Hinblick auf die Energieverbrauchskennzeichnung von Kühlgeräten mit Direktverkaufsfunktion

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 315 vom 5. Dezember 2019
  )

Auf Seite 174, Anhang IV, Tabelle 4, erhalten die Zeilen „Vertikale und kombinierte Gefrierschränke für Supermärkte“ und „Horizontale Gefrierschränke für Supermärkte“ folgende Fassung:

| „Vertikale und kombinierte Gefrierschränke für Supermärkte | L1 | ≤ – 15 | n. a. | ≤ – 18 | 1,00 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| L2 | ≤ – 12 | n. a. | ≤ – 18 | 0,90 |
| L3 | ≤ – 12 | n. a. | ≤ – 15 | 0,90 |
| Horizontale Gefrierschränke für Supermärkte | L1 | ≤ – 15 | n. a. | ≤ – 18 | 1,00 |
| L2 | ≤ – 12 | n. a. | ≤ – 18 | 0,92 |
| L3 | ≤ – 12 | n. a. | ≤ – 15 | 0,92“ |

„Vertikale und kombinierte Gefrierschränke für Supermärkte

L1

≤ – 15

n. a.

≤ – 18

1,00

L2

≤ – 12

n. a.

≤ – 18

0,90

L3

≤ – 12

n. a.

≤ – 15

0,90

Horizontale Gefrierschränke für Supermärkte

L1

≤ – 15

n. a.

≤ – 18

1,00

L2

≤ – 12

n. a.

≤ – 18

0,92

L3

≤ – 12

n. a.

≤ – 15

0,92“

---
#### § 25.402 Transferability.

Each Private Loan Note, with the Guaranty attached, shall be fully and freely transferable to any Permitted Guaranty Holder.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Desmond Juwon Woods, Appellant

No. 06-15-00063-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 76th District Court of 

Morris County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

10,920CR). Memorandum Opinion 

delivered by Justice Moseley, Chief Justice 

Morriss and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Desmond Juwon Woods, has adequately indicated his inability 

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED DECEMBER 29, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
#### Mark J. Fuzak, as Executor of George T. Fuzak, Deceased, Appellant, v Kerry E. Donohue, Respondent.

[803 NYS2d 454]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Nelson H. Cosgrove, J.), entered December 8, 2004. The order granted defendant’s motion for an order compelling plaintiff to forward to defendant’s attorneys an authorization to allow them to obtain all medical records and the autopsy report from the no-fault file of decedent.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the motion is denied.

Memorandum: Plaintiff appeals from an order of Supreme Court that granted the motion of defendant and ordered plaintiff to “forward to defendant’s attorneys an authorization to allow [them] to obtain all medical records and the autopsy report from the no-fault file of the decedent, Geroge T. Fuzak.” We agree with plaintiff that the court erred in granting that motion because a note of issue and statement of readiness had been filed and defendant failed to “establish that ‘unusual or unanticipated circumstances develop[ed] subsequent to the filing of [the] note of issue and [statement] of readiness which require additional pretrial proceedings to prevent substantial prejudice’ ” *(Di Matteo v Grey,*280 AD2d 929, 930 [2001], quoting 22 NYCRR 202.21 [d]; *see Kephart v Burke,*306 AD2d 924, *1023925 [2003]). Even though defendant is correct that an authorization is a means by which to obtain discovery and thus does not itself constitute discovery, defendant moved for the authorization in order to obtain specific records, and the order granting that motion explicitly authorized defendant’s attorneys “to obtain all medical records and the autopsy report from the no-fault file of the decedent.” Those records are discoverable materials, and defendant failed to establish the unusual or unanticipated circumstances needed to obtain such discoverable materials at this time.

We reject the further contention of defendant that she sought the records for trial. Defendant requested that the records be given to her attorneys, and the court ordered plaintiff to forward the necessary authorization to allow defendant’s attorneys to obtain those records. Trial subpoenas duces tecum require that records be sent to the court *(see*CPLR 2301), while discovery subpoenas duces tecum permit the records to be sent to counsel *(see*CPLR 3120). We therefore reverse the order and deny the motion. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Martoche, Pine and Hayes, JJ.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases…Acting Assistant Secretary Littlejohn’s Travel to Australia, New Caledonia, and Fiji

# 											Acting Assistant Secretary Littlejohn’s Travel to Australia, New Caledonia, and Fiji									

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

October 19, 2023

Acting Assistant Secretary of State for Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs Jennifer R. Littlejohn will travel to Australia, New Caledonia, and Fiji from October 21-31 to lead the U.S. delegation to the Pacific Community (SPC) conference and show strong U.S. support for the region and its climate resilience, oceans, and science and technology goals. The visit builds on strong U.S. engagement with partners in the region, including at the 52nd Pacific Island Forum Leaders Meeting and Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s upcoming State Visit to Washington, D.C.

While in Fiji, the Acting Assistant Secretary will launch a new Gender Equity and Equality Action (GEEA) Fund grant in support of Pacific women’s and girls’ crucial role in climate and clean energy solutions.

For media inquiries, please contact OES-PA-DG@state.gov.

Tags

AustraliaBureau of East Asian and Pacific AffairsBureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific AffairsClimate ChangeEnergyFijiGenderOffice of the SpokespersonRacial Equity and JusticeThe Ocean and Polar AffairsU.S.-Pacific Island Country SummitU.S.-Pacific Island Forum Leader's SummitWomen’s Economic Empowerment

Back to Top