alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CATHERINE PATRICE PAIGE

,

Appellant

,

v. Case No. 5D 23

- 129

LT Case No. 16

- 2018

- CF

- 3145

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. ________________________________/

Decision filed June 27, 2023

Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Duval County

, London M. Kite , Judge.

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender,

and Ross S. Haine, II, Assistant

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for

Appel lant

.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LAMBERT, C.J.

, BOATWRIGHT and KILBANE , JJ., co ncur.
124 STAT. 4066 PUBLIC LAW 111–367—JAN. 4, 2011 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 6392: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010): 

Nov. 29, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 16, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–367 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 5003 Westfields Boulevard in Centreville, Virginia, as the ‘‘Colonel George Juskalian Post 

Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. COLONEL GEORGE JUSKALIAN POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 5003 Westfields Boulevard in Centreville, Virginia, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Colonel George 

Juskalian Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Colonel George Juskalian Post Office Building’’. 

Approved January 4, 2011. 

Jan. 4, 2011 

[H.R. 6392] 


dkrause on GSDDPC29PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Acting Deputy Secretary Nuland’s Call with Pakistani Caretaker Foreign Minister Jilani

# 									Acting Deputy Secretary Nuland’s Call with Pakistani Caretaker Foreign Minister Jilani							

Readout

Office of the Spokesperson

October 26, 2023

The below is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller:

Acting Deputy Secretary of State and Under Secretary for Political Affairs Victoria Nuland spoke today with Pakistani Caretaker Foreign Minister Jalil Abbas Jilani to discuss critical issues in the U.S.-Pakistan partnership. Acting Deputy Secretary Nuland and Foreign Minister Jilani discussed our mutual interest in facilitating the safe and timely resettlement of eligible Afghans to the United States. They also agreed on the importance of free and fair elections that are inclusive and held in a manner consistent with Pakistan’s laws.

Both the Acting Deputy Secretary and Foreign Minister Jilani discussed the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas. Acting Deputy Secretary highlighted the United States’ call for the release of all hostages and the protection of civilians from harm. Acting Deputy Secretary Nuland and Foreign Minister Jilani also agreed on the need for a continuous flow of humanitarian aid to civilians in Gaza and to prevent the conflict from spreading.

Tags

Bureau of South and Central Asian AffairsDeputy Secretary of StateOffice of the SpokespersonPakistanUnder Secretary for Political Affairs

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 316.11 Reservation as to issue of bonds.

The Secretary of the Treasury reserved the right to reject any application for purchase of Series E bonds, in whole or in part, and to refuse to issue, or permit to be issued hereunder, any such bonds in any case or any class or classes of cases if such action was deemed to be in the public interest. Any action in any such respect was final.
§ 156.6695-1 Other assessable penalties with respect to the preparation of tax returns or claims for refund for other persons. ( a ) *In general.* A person who is a tax return preparer of any return or claim for refund of tax under section 5881 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) shall be subject to penalties for failure to furnish a copy to the taxpayer under section 6695(a) of the Code, failure to sign the return under section 6695(b) of the Code, failure to furnish an identification number under section 6695(c) of the Code, failure to retain a copy or list under section 6695(d) of the Code, failure to file a correct information return under section 6695(e) of the Code, and negotiation of a check under section 6695(f) of the Code, in the manner stated in § 1.6695-1 of this chapter.
( b ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section is applicable to returns and claims for refund filed after December 31, 2008.
[T.D. 9436, 73 FR 78462, Dec. 22, 2008]
#### § 1010.821 Penalty adjustment and table.

(a) *Inflation adjustments.* In accordance with the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990, 28 U.S.C. 2461 note, (“FCPIA Act”), as further amended by the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015, FinCEN has set forth in paragraph (b) of this section adjusted maximum penalty amounts for each civil monetary penalty provided by law within its jurisdiction that is subject to the FCPIA Act. The adjusted civil monetary penalty amounts replace the amounts published in the statutes authorizing the assessment of penalties.

(b) *Maximum civil monetary penalties.* The statutory penalty provisions and their adjusted maximum amounts or range of minimum and maximum amounts are set out in Table 1. The last column in the table provides the newly effective maximum penalty amounts or range of minimum and maximum amounts. These maximum penalty amounts do not, however, limit the total amount of a penalty in the case of a penalty that may be imposed for each day a violation continues.

| U.S. Code citation | Civil monetary penalty description | Penalties as last
amended by statute | Maximum penalty amounts or range of minimum and maximum penalty amounts for penalties assessed on or after January 25, 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 12 U.S.C. 1829b(j) | Relating to Recordkeeping Violations for Funds Transfers | $10,000 | $25,597 |
| 12 U.S.C. 1955 | Willful or Grossly Negligent Recordkeeping Violations | 10,000 | 25,597 |
| 31 U.S.C. 5318(k)(3)(C) | Failure To Terminate Correspondent Relationship with Foreign Bank | 10,000 | 17,315 |
| 31 U.S.C. 5321(a)(1) | General Civil Penalty Provision for Willful Violations of Bank Secrecy Act Requirements | 25,000-100,000 | 69,733-278,937 |
| 31 U.S.C. 5321(a)(5)(B)(i) | Foreign Financial Agency Transaction—Non-Willful Violation of Transaction | 10,000 | 16,117 |
| 31 U.S.C. 5321(a)(5)(C)(i)(I) | Foreign Financial Agency Transaction—Willful Violation of Transaction | 100,000 | 161,166 |
| 31 U.S.C. 5321(a)(6)(A) | Negligent Violation by Financial Institution or Non-Financial Trade or Business | 500 | 1,394 |
| 31 U.S.C. 5321(a)(6)(B) | Pattern of Negligent Activity by Financial Institution or Non-Financial Trade or Business | 50,000 | 108,489 |
| 31 U.S.C. 5321(a)(7) | Violation of Certain Due Diligence Requirements, Prohibition on Correspondent Accounts for Shell Banks, and Special Measures | 1,000,000 | 1,731,383 |
| 31 U.S.C. 5330(e) | Civil Penalty for Failure To Register as Money Transmitting Business | 5,000 | 10,289 |
| 31 U.S.C. 5336(h)(3)(A)(i) | Civil Penalty for Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Violation | 500 | 591 |
| 31 U.S.C. 5336(h)(3)(B)(i) | Civil Penalty for Unauthorized Disclosure or Use of Beneficial Ownership Information | 500 | 591 |

Table 1 to § 1010.821—Penalty Adjustment Table

[81 FR 42505, June 30, 2016, as amended at 82 FR 10439, Feb. 10, 2017; 83 FR 11881, Mar. 19, 2018; 85 FR 9371, Feb. 19, 2020; 86 FR 7349, Jan. 28, 2020; 86 FR 7810, Feb. 2, 2021; 87 FR 3434, Jan. 24, 2022; 88 FR 3312, Jan. 19, 2023; 88 FR 7357, Feb. 3, 2023; 89 FR 4821, Jan. 25, 2024]
#### § 31.3121(a)(9)-1 [Reserved]
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 306.105 Requests for suspension of transactions in registered securities. ( a ) *Timely notice.* If prior to the time a registered security bearing an apparently valid assignment has been functioned, a claim is received from the owner or his authorized representative showing that: ( 1 ) The security was lost, stolen, or destroyed and that it was unassigned, or not so assigned as to have become in effect payable to bearer, or
( 2 ) The assignment was affected by fraud, the transaction for which the security was received will be suspended. The interested parties will be given a reasonable period of time in which to effect settlement of their interests by agreement, or to institute judicial proceedings.
( b ) *Late notice.* If, after a registered security has been transferred, exchanged, or redeemed in reliance on an apparently valid assignment, an owner notifies the Bureau that the assignment was affected by fraud or that the security had been lost or stolen, the Department will undertake only to furnish available information.
( c ) *Forged assignments.* A claim that an assignment of a registered security is a forgery will be investigated. If it is established that the assignment was in fact forged and that the owner did not authorize or ratify it, or receive any benefit therefrom, the Department will recognize his ownership and grant appropriate relief.
- Office Home
- About Us

HomeOffice of the Chief Economist...About Us – Office of the Chief Economist

# 									About Us – Office of the Chief Economist							

Office of the Chief Economist

The Office of the Chief Economist (OCE) was created in 2011 as an essential tool for advancing economic statecraft as a U.S. foreign policy priority. The Chief Economist reports to the Secretary of State through the Under Secretary for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment.

Our mission in OCE has three parts: strategic advice, capacity building and outreach. Our first role is to provide expert analysis and timely advice to the Secretary and other senior leaders across the Department. For this purpose staff economists engage in several analytical tasks. OCE monitors and explains current economic and financial trends in key countries and regions. We also analyze contemporaneous, hot-button issues of high priority where economics and foreign policy intersect and Department officials need real-time understanding. Finally, we engage in deeper research into longer term, thematic global trends with economic underpinnings that promise to affect economic diplomacy in the future.

OCE is part of the “E” family of offices and bureaus in the State Department focused broadly on international economics and economic development. Our office serves as an analytical resource for the whole Department, including our embassies and consulates overseas. Our relationship with regional bureaus is especially important as we seek to integrate economic issues more closely with the Department’s strategic objectives.

OCE also promotes economic capacity building. We collaborate with our colleagues at the Foreign Service Institute on training for Department staff and advising on specialized programs. We serve as a liaison with the academic community, international organizations, and other federal agencies, both by contributing to advances in the field of international economics and by bringing cutting-edge researchers in to share their insights with Department policy experts. In short, we engage in research and outreach to ensure that the nation’s Foreign Service Officers build the networks and experiences needed to advance U.S. economic and commercial goals.

Lastly, the Office of the Chief Economist works to amplify our economic and commercial outreach through making public speeches and issuing reports and working papers of general interest. We also interact closely with students at numerous universities and colleges who are interested in analyzing key aspects of current international economic questions.

Back to Top
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 37 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 37

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
    provide for a balanced budget for the United States Government.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

Mr. Orton introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
    provide for a balanced budget for the United States Government.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution if 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after its submission to the States for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Total outlays of the United States for any fiscal year 
shall not exceed total receipts to the United States for that fiscal 
year.
    ``Section 2. Prior to each fiscal year, the President shall 
transmit to the Congress a proposed budget for the United States 
Government for that fiscal year in which total outlays do not exceed 
total receipts.
    ``Section 3. For any fiscal year in which actual outlays exceed 
actual receipts, the Congress shall provide by law for the repayment in 
the ensuing fiscal year of such excess outlays. If Congress fails to 
provide by law for repayment, within fifteen days after Congress 
adjourns to end a session, there shall be a sequestration of all 
outlays to eliminate a budget deficit.
    ``Section 4. The provisions of this article may be waived for any 
fiscal year only if Congress so provides by law by a majority of the 
whole number of each House. Such waiver shall be subject to veto by the 
President.
    ``Section 5. Total receipts shall include all receipts of the 
United States Government except those derived from borrowing. Total 
outlays shall include all outlays of the United States Government, 
except for those for repayment of debt principal.
    ``Section 6. This article shall take effect beginning with fiscal 
year 2002 or with the second fiscal year beginning after its 
ratification, whichever is later.''.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2023039EN.01006701.xml

| 9.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 39/67 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 39/67

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2019/1242 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 setting CO2 emission performance standards for new heavy-duty vehicles and amending Regulations (EC) No 595/2009 and (EU) 2018/956 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Directive 96/53/EC

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 198 of 25 July 2019
  )

On page 236, Annex I, point 5.2 ‘Emission credits and emission debts in each reporting period’:

for:

‘If CO2Y > TY for the years 2025 to 2029:

Y

Y

| | dCO2Y = (CO2Y – TY) × VY and |
| --- | --- |

dCO2Y = (CO2Y – TY) × VY and

dCO2Y

Y

Y

Y

| | dCO2Y = 0’ |
| --- | --- |

dCO2Y = 0’

Y

read:

‘If CO2Y > TY for the years 2025 to 2029:

Y

Y

| | dCO2Y = (CO2Y – TY) × VY and |
| --- | --- |

dCO2Y = (CO2Y – TY) × VY and

dCO2Y

Y

Y

Y

| | cCO2Y = 0’ |
| --- | --- |

cCO2Y = 0’

Y

---
# L_2020342EN.01003101.xml

| 16.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 342/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 342/31

---

Corrigendum to Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1436 of 12 October 2020 authorising Germany to apply a reduced rate of taxation to electricity directly provided to vessels at berth in a port, in accordance with Article 19 of Directive 2003/96/EC

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 331 of 12 October 2020
  )

On the cover, in the table of contents, on page 30, in the title, and on page 31, in the concluding formula:

for:

‘
  12 October 2020
  ’,

read:

‘
  7 October 2020
  ’.

---
- Office Home
- About Us
- Remarks and Releases
- 2017-2021 Archive

HomeOffice of the Special Envoy To Monitor and Combat Antisemitism...Antisemitism Conference 2020

# 									Ancient Hatred, Modern Medium: Conference on Internet Antisemitism							

Office of the Special Envoy To Monitor and Combat Antisemitism

In October 2020, the Department hosted the first-ever U.S. Government conference focused on combatting online antisemitism. Organized by the Office of the Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Antisemitism, the virtual conference aimed to explore the threats posed by antisemitism on the internet and social media and to consider practical responses for governments and civil society.

The conference was subsequently screened virtually on the State Department website on October 21 and 22. The views expressed in the conference are those of the speakers and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of the State Department.

To learn more about the conference and to watch the virtual sessions visit: https://2017-2021.state.gov/anti-semitism-conference/.

Tags

AntisemitismTechnologyTelecommunications

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 205.3 What Federal assistance programs are subject to this subpart A? ( a ) Generally, this subpart prescribes the rules that apply to Federal assistance programs which: ( 1 ) Are listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance;
( 2 ) Meet the funding threshold for a major Federal assistance program; and
( 3 ) Are included in a Treasury-State agreement or default procedures.
( b ) Upon a State's request, we will make additional Federal assistance programs subject to subpart A by lowering the funding threshold in the Treasury-State agreement. All of a State's programs that meet this lower threshold would be subject to this subpart A.
( c ) We may make additional Federal assistance programs subject to subpart A if a State or Federal Program Agency fails to comply with subpart B of this part.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 210.4 Authorizations and revocations of authorizations. ( a ) *Requirements for authorization.* Each debit and credit entry subject to this part shall be authorized in accordance with the applicable ACH Rules and the following additional requirements: ( 1 ) The agency or the RDFI that accepts the recipient's authorization shall verify the identity of the recipient and, in the case of a written authorization requiring the recipient's signature, the validity of the recipient's signature.
( 2 ) Unless authorized in writing, or similarly authenticated, by an agency, no person or entity shall initiate or transmit a debit entry to that agency, other than a reversal of a credit entry previously sent to the agency.
( b ) *Terms of authorizations.* By executing an authorization for an agency to initiate entries, a recipient agrees: ( 1 ) To the provisions of this part;
( 2 ) To provide accurate information;
( 3 ) To verify the recipient's identity to the satisfaction of the RDFI or agency, whichever has accepted the authorization;
( 4 ) That any new authorization inconsistent with a previous authorization shall supersede the previous authorization; and
( 5 ) That the Federal Government may reverse any duplicate or erroneous entry or file as provided in § 210.6(f) of this part.
( c ) *Termination and revocation of authorizations.* An authorization shall remain valid until it is terminated or revoked by: ( 1 ) With respect to a recipient of benefit payments, a change in the recipient's ownership of the deposit account as reflected in the deposit account records, including the removal of the name of the recipient, the addition of a power of attorney, or any action which alters the interest of the recipient;
( 2 ) The death or legal incapacity of a recipient of benefit payments or the death of a beneficiary;
( 3 ) The closing of the recipient's account at the RDFI by the recipient or by the RDFI. With respect to a recipient of benefit payments, if an RDFI closes an account to which benefit payments currently are being sent, it shall provide 30 calendar days written notice to the recipient prior to closing the account, except in cases of fraud; or
( 4 ) The RDFI's insolvency, closure by any state or Federal regulatory authority or by corporate action, or the appointment of a receiver, conservator, or liquidator for the RDFI. In any such event, the authorization shall remain valid if a successor is named. The Federal Government may temporarily transfer authorizations to a consenting RDFI. The transfer is valid until either a new authorization is executed by the recipient, or 120 calendar days have elapsed since the insolvency, closure, or appointment, whichever occurs first.
§ 0.102 Applicability. ( a ) Unless otherwise specified, the regulations in this part apply to all employees of the Department at all times, regardless of whether they are on duty or on leave, including leave without pay.
( b ) The regulations in this part may be supplemented by regulations, interpretive guidelines and procedures issued by the Department's offices and bureaus. The absence of a specific published rule of conduct covering an action or omission does not validate that action or omission nor indicate that the action or omission would not result in corrective or disciplinary action.
#### Frank PALUMBO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sanford I. WEILL et al., Defendants-Appellees.

Docket No. 01-7942.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

June 18, 2002.

Present MINER, CABRANES and POOLER, Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of said District Court be and is AFFIRMED.

Frank Palumbo, proceeding pro se, appeals from a March 20, 2001, order the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Janet Bond Arterton, *Judge),*granting various defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaint and denying his various cross-motions for leave to amend and supplement the complaint and for sanctions against various defendants and non-parties. Appellee Sylvester Cocivi moves to dismiss the appeal.

We affirm for substantially the reasons stated in the District Court’s March 20, 2001, Ruling on Pending Motions. *See Palumbo v. Weil,*No. 3:98cv1411, slip op. (March 20, 2001). Cocivi’s motion to dismiss the appeal is dismissed as moot.