alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Jesus Jose Lacer v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 7

- 0 02 67

- CR

Trial court case number: 44479

Trial court: 33rd District Court of Burnet County

On November 21, 2017, the Court issued an order noting that certain exhibits, marked by

the official court reporter as follows, were not included as part of the reporter’s record forwarded

to this Court on appeal.

1. Defendant’s sealed Exhibit 2 ( video recording containing pornographic material) ;

2. Defendant’s sealed Exhibit 3 ( video recording containing pornographic material )

.

Thus, we ordered the District Clerk of Burnet County or the court reporter, if the exhibits

were still in her possession, to del iver to the Clerk of this Court the original above described sealed

exhibits. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 34.5(c), 34.5(f), 34.6(d), 34.6(g). The District Clerk of Burnet

County or the court reporter was also directed to include a copy of the trial court’s order sealing

Defendant’s Exhibits 2 and 3. The court reporter has now notified the Court that she filed the

above described sealed exhibits with the District Clerk of Burnet County and no longer has access

to them.

Accordingly, we again ORDER the District Clerk o f Burnet C ounty to deliver to the Clerk

of this Court the original above described sealed exhibits. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 34.5 (c) , 34.5(f),

34.6(d) , 34.6(g) . The District Clerk of Burnet County should also include a copy of the trial court’ s

order s ealing Defendant’s Exhibits 2 and 3.

The Clerk of this Court is directed to recei ve, maintain, and keep safe the original sealed

exhibit s ; to deliver them to the justices of this Court for their inspection; and, upon completion of

inspection, to return the original s of the above described sealed exhibits to the District Clerk of

Burnet County

.

The sealed exhibits shall be filed in the First Court of Appea ls within 5 days of the dateof this order

. If the District Clerk of Burnet County is unable to file the sealed exhibits within 5

days, the District Clerk is directed to file an information sheet or certified statement informing the

Court of the status of the exhibits.



### It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: January 11, 2 018
§ 44.4412-1 Registration. ( a ) *In general.* Every person required to pay the special tax imposed by section 4411 shall register and file a return on Form 11-C. For provisions relating to the general requirement for filing a return, see § 44.6011(a)-1.
( b ) *Information to be reported on Form 11-C.* ( 1 ) Every person required to make a return on Form 11-C shall report thereon his full name and place of residence. A person doing business under an alias, style, or trade name shall give his true name, followed by his alias, style, or trade name. In the case of a partnership, association, firm, or company, other than a corporation, the style or trade name shall be given, also the true name of each member and his place of residence. In the case of a corporation, the true name and title of each officer and his place of residence shall be shown.
( 2 ) Each person engaged in the business of accepting wagers on his own account shall report on Form 11-C the name and address of each place where such business will be conducted and the name, address, and number appearing on the special (occupational) stamp of each agent or employee who may receive wagers on his behalf. Thereafter, a return shall be filed on Form 11-C, marked “Supplemental”, each time an additional employee or agent is engaged to receive wagers. Such supplemental return shall be filed not later than 10 days after the date such additional employee or agent is engaged to receive wagers and shall show the name, address, and number appearing on the special (occupational) stamp of each such agent or employee. As to a change of address, see § 44.4905-2.
( 3 ) Each agent or employee who receives wagers for or on behalf of a person engaged in the business of accepting wagers on his own account shall report on Form 11-C the name and residence address of each person (i.e., individual, partnership, corporation, etc.) on whose behalf wagers are to be received. Thereafter, the agent or employee shall file a return on Form 11-C, marked “Supplemental”, each time he is engaged or employed to receive wagers for a person or persons other than the person or persons previously reported on Form 11-C. Such supplemental return shall be filed not later than 10 days after the date he is engaged to receive wagers and shall show the name, business address, or, if none, the residence address of the person or persons by whom he is engaged to receive wagers. As to a change of address, see § 44.4905-2.
( c ) *Time and place for filing Form 11-C.* For provisions relating to the time for filing Form 11-C (other than Form 11-C marked “Supplemental”), see section 6071 and § 44.6071-1. For provisions relating to the place for filing Form 11-C, see section 6091 and § 44.6091-1.
:U-00&

NO. 15-0069

CLIFFORD FAIRFAX

v.

BRAD LIVINGSTON, ET AL.

•1L£ COPY

ILEDuicbuRTOFAPPiALS

'^h^CourtolAEoealsDisUict

) COURT OF TEXAS

9 2015;

c.,thy ^LUS^CJ

Anderson Count

12th District.

U<

May 8, 2015

Petitioner's petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case,

having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.

••••••••••

I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify

that the above and attached is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of

Texas in the case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of

said Court under the date shown.

WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this

the 19th day ofJune, 2015.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. FDA-2008-N-0077]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “MedWatch: Food and Drug Administration Medical Products Reporting Program” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Elizabeth Berbakos, Office of Information Management (HFA-710), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857,                         *Elizabeth.Berbakos@fda.hhs.gov*, 301-796-3792.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of September 24, 2008 (73 FR 55111), the agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0291. The approval expires on December 31, 2011. A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at                     *http://www.reginfo.gov/​public/​do/​PRAMain*.                

Dated: August 13, 2009.

Jeffrey Shuren,

Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.

[FR Doc. E9-19980 Filed 8-19-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
§ 1021.330 Exceptions to the reporting requirements of 31 U.S.C. 5331. ( a ) *Receipt of currency by certain casinos having gross annual gaming revenue in excess of $1,000,000* —*In general.* If a casino receives currency in excess of $10,000 and is required to report the receipt of such currency directly to the Treasury Department under § 1010.306, § 1021.311, or § 1021.313 and is subject to the recordkeeping requirements of § 1021.410, then the casino is not required to make a report with respect to the receipt of such currency under 31 U.S.C. 5331 and this section.
( b ) *Casinos exempt under § 1010.970(c) .* Pursuant to § 1010.970, the Secretary may exempt from the reporting and recordkeeping requirements under § 1010.306, § 1021.311, § 1021.313 or § 1021.410 casinos in any state whose regulatory system substantially meets the reporting and recordkeeping requirements of this chapter. Such casinos shall not be required to report receipt of currency under 31 U.S.C. 5331 and this section.
( c ) *Reporting of currency received in a non-gaming business.* Non-gaming businesses (such as shops, restaurants, entertainment, and hotels) at casino hotels and resorts are separate trades or businesses in which the receipt of currency in excess of $10,000 is reportable under section 5331 and these regulations. Thus, a casino exempt under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section must report with respect to currency in excess of $10,000 received in its non-gaming businesses.
( d ) *Example.* The following example illustrates the application of the rules in paragraphs (a) and (c) of this section:
Example. A and B are casinos having gross annual gaming revenue in excess of $1,000,000. C is a casino with gross annual gaming revenue of less than $1,000,000. Casino A receives $15,000 in currency from a customer with respect to a gaming transaction which the casino reports to the Treasury Department under §§ 1010.306, 1021.311, and 1021.313. Casino B receives $15,000 in currency from a customer in payment for accommodations provided to that customer at Casino B's hotel. Casino C receives $15,000 in currency from a customer with respect to a gaming transaction. Casino A is not required to report the transaction under 31 U.S.C. 5331 or this section because the exception for certain casinos provided in paragraph (a) of this section (“the casino exception”) applies. Casino B is required to report under 31 U.S.C. 5331 and this section because the casino exception does not apply to the receipt of currency from a nongaming activity. Casino C is required to report under 31 U.S.C. 5331 and this section because the casino exception does not apply to casinos having gross annual gaming revenue of $1,000,000 or less which do not have to report to the Treasury Department under §§ 1010.306, 1021.311, and 1021.313.
HomeThe United States President's Emergency Plan for AIDS ReliefRemarks & Releases...After Losing His Mother to AIDS, HIV-Positive Boy Finds Hope

# 									After Losing His Mother to AIDS, HIV-Positive Boy Finds Hope							

Stories of Hope

At age 7, Tanzanian Gilbert Maiko lost his mother to AIDS. Abandoned by his father, Gilbert went to live with his grandmother. When Gilbert’s health started to noticeably deteriorate, a neighbor advised his aunt to get him tested for HIV.

Gilbert was diagnosed HIV-positive, but his aunt didn’t share the results with him. After a few weeks of medication, his health improved.

“I told my grandmother I was cured,” Gilbert, now 14, said. “I argued I no longer needed the pills as I was doing so well, but she insisted I keep taking them.”

Sometimes Gilbert acted like he was taking the medicine, but threw it away once his aunt wasn’t looking. Because Gilbert started getting sick again, his aunt suspected he had stopped taking his medicine. One day, she hid and caught him tossing his pills.

It was at this point when he was 9 years old that Gilbert’s family decided to tell him his HIV status. Remembering his mother’s death, Gilbert was frightened. He did not fully understand HIV and continued taking his antiretroviral medication sporadically.

But Gilbert’s understanding of HIV and adherence to treatment changed dramatically when he visited a treatment clinic at Nyangao Hospital. There he discovered a club for children living with HIV.

The club was organized by Miriam Chilumba, a psychosocial support nurse affectionately known as Mama. She explained to parents, guardians, and children that the clubs allow children living with HIV to share experiences with each other. They also learn more about the virus and the importance of treatment.

“I look forward to the club meetings and never forget the day,” Gilbert said. “At the Ariel Club, I learned my role in maintaining my health. Since then, I have not missed my clinic appointments and I never skip my medicine.”

“Neither my aunt nor my grandmother has to remind me of my appointment,” he said. “I do all this by myself. I know when I skip taking medicine I will get sick, and my ability to fight other infections will be damaged.”

Ariel Clubs are named in memory of the daughter of Elizabeth Glaser, the cofounder of the Elizabeth Glaser Pediatrics AIDS Foundation.

Tags

The United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief

Back to Top
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-4258

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

ERIC LAMONTE DAVIS, a/k/a Eric Davis,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, 

District Judge. (3:12-cr-00058-GMG-DJJ-3)

Submitted: September 25, 2013 Decided: November 6, 2013

Before KEENAN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nicholas Forrest Colvin, THE LAW OFFICE OF NICHOLAS COLVIN, 

ESQ., PLLC, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellant. Stephen 

Donald Warner, Assistant United States Attorney, Elkins, West 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Eric Lamonte Davis appeals his conviction and 

ninety-two month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to 

possession with intent to distribute cocaine base, in violation 

of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Davis’ counsel has filed a brief 

pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), 

concluding that there are no meritorious issues for appeal. 

Davis was notified of his right to file a supplemental pro se 

brief but has not done so. Following careful review of the 

record, we affirm. 

Before accepting Davis’ guilty plea, the district 

court conducted a thorough plea colloquy, fully complying with 

Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 and ensuring that Davis’ plea was knowing 

and voluntary and supported by an independent factual basis. 

See United States v. DeFusco, 949 F.2d 114, 116, 119-20 (4th 

Cir. 1991). The court subsequently followed all necessary 

procedural steps in sentencing Davis, properly calculating his 

Guidelines range, considering the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors 

and the parties’ arguments, and providing an individualized 

assessment based on the facts presented. See Gall v. United 

States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). Davis’ within-Guidelines 

sentence is presumed substantively reasonable on appeal, and he 

has not met his burden to rebut this presumption. See United 

States v. Montes-Pineda, 445 F.3d 375, 379 (4th Cir. 2006). 
3

In accordance with Anders, we have reviewed the record 

and have found no meritorious issues. We therefore affirm the 

district court’s judgment and deny counsel’s request to withdraw 

from representation. This court requires that counsel inform 

Davis, in writing, of the right to petition the Supreme Court of 

the United States for further review. If Davis requests that a 

petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition 

would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for 

leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must 

state that a copy thereof was served on Davis. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           9,632
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,459
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (40)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,710
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,379
<PP&E>                                           9,628
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,806)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 100,834
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,227
<BONDS>                                         69,384
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,813
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   100,834
<SALES>                                         15,826
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,826
<CGS>                                            9,752
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,752
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,525
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,417
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (732)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (732)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (732)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Flavio J. Caserta et al. *v.*Herbert E. Wetmore

*Valentino D. Clementino,*for the appellee (defendant).

*Thomas P. PLeslin,*for the appellants (plaintiffs).

Argued November 5

decided November *5,*1963

The motion by the defendant to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County is granted.
§ 16.12 Notice of hearing. ( a ) When the ALJ receives the complaint and answer, the ALJ shall promptly serve a notice of hearing upon the defendant and the agency representative in the manner prescribed by § 16.8.
( b ) Such notice shall include— ( 1 ) The tentative time and place, and the nature of the hearing;
( 2 ) The legal authority and jurisdiction under which the hearing is to be held;
( 3 ) The matters of fact and law to be asserted;
( 4 ) A description of the procedures for the conduct of the hearing;
( 5 ) The names, addresses, and telephone numbers of the representatives of the Government and of the defendant, if any; and
( 6 ) Such other matters as the ALJ deems appropriate.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

DANIEL LEE WHITE,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D22-1677

LT Case No. 2010-CF-4908-A

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/ 

Decision filed January 10, 2023 

Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Seminole County, 

William S. Orth, Judge. 

Daniel Lee White, Lake Butler, pro se. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Whitney Brown 

Hartless, Assistant Attorney General, 

Daytona Beach, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. 

LAMBERT, C.J., EDWARDS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
#### § 1022.600 General.

Money services businesses are subject to the special standards of diligence; prohibitions; and special measures requirements set forth and cross referenced in this subpart. Money services businesses should also refer to subpart F of part 1010 of this chapter for special standards of diligence; prohibitions; and special measures contained in that subpart which apply to money services businesses.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

## IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-30573 SANDRA ROBERT JACOB; KIRT JACOB, JR., INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF DECEDENT KIRT JACOB SR.; TINA JACOB BROUWER Plaintiffs-Appellants v. GRAND CASINOS OF MISSISSIPPI, LLC-GULFPORT, DOING BUSINESS AS GRAND CASINO GULFPORT Defendant-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, New Orleans

No. 2:05-CV-805 Before JONES, Chief Judge, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * 

### There being no reversible error, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. See 5 TH 

### C IRCUIT 

### L OC

### . R ULE 

### 47.6. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D June 6, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 157 (Monday, August 17, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 41464]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19631]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>11837 and <greek-i>11838]


Nebraska Disaster Number NE-00027

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Nebraska 
(FEMA-1853-DR), dated 07/31/2009.
    Incident: Severe storms, tornadoes, and flooding.
    Incident Period: 06/05/2009 through 06/26/2009.
    Effective Date: 08/10/2009.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 09/29/2009.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/03/2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of 
Nebraska, dated 07/31/2009, is hereby amended to include the following 
areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

Primary Counties: Chase, Deuel, Lincoln, Perkins.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-19631 Filed 8-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P