Final 

Third Quarter 2013 - Quarterly 

Groundwater Monitoring Report 

Inside Tunnel Wells 

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Oahu, Hawaii 

DOH Facility ID: 9-102271 

DOH Release ID: 990051, 010011, and 020028 

September 2013 

Department of the Navy 

Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Hawaii 

400 Marshall Road 

JBPHH HI 96860-3139 

Contract Number N62742-12-D-1853, CTO 0002 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank. 
Final 

Third Quarter 2013 - Quarterly 

Groundwater Monitoring Report 

Inside Tunnel Wells 

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Oahu, Hawaii 

DOH Facility ID: 9-102271 

DOH Release ID: 990051, 010011, and 020028 

September 2013 

Prepared for: 

Department of the Navy 

Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Hawaii 

400 Marshall Road 

JBPHH, HI 96860-3139 

Prepared by: 

Environmental Science International, Inc. 

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304 

Kailua, HI 96734 

Prepared under: 

Contract Number N62742-12-D-1853, CTO 0002
This Page Intentionally Left Blank. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 3Q2013 Status Report Page v September 2013 

Inside Tunnel Wells 

FINAL 

THIRD QUARTER 2013 - QUARTERLY GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT 

INSIDE TUNNEL WELLS 

RED HILL BULK FUEL STORAGE FACILITY

Long-Term Groundwater and Soil Vapor Monitoring 

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

Joint-Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Oahu, Hawaii 

Prepared for: 

Department of the Navy 

Commanding Officer, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Hawaii 

400 Marshall Road 

JBPHH, HI 96860-3139 

Prepared by: 

Environmental Science International, Inc. 

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304 

Kailua, HI 96734 

(808) 261-0740 

Prepared under: 

Contract Number: N62742-12-D-1853 

Contract Task Order: 0002 

Approval Signature: 

 Darren Uchima, Navy Technical Representative Date 

Approval Signature: 

 Robert Chong, ESI Project Manager Date 

 

Approval Signature: 

 Iris van der Zander, ESI QA Manager Date 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 3Q2013 Status Report Page vi September 2013 

Inside Tunnel Wells 

This Page Intentionally Left Blank. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 3Q2013 Status Report Page vii September 2013 

Inside Tunnel Wells 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

Section Title Page

ES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-1

 

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1

1.1 Site Description 1-1

1.2 Physical Settings 1-2

1.3 Background 1-3

 

2.0 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING 2-1

2.1 Groundwater Sampling 2-1

2.2 Analytical Results 2-1

2.3 Groundwater Contaminant Trends 2-2

2.4 Waste Disposal 2-3

3.0 DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT 3-1

3.1 Data Validation and Assessment 3-1

3.2 Data Assessment and Usability Conclusions 3-4

 

4.0 SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4-1

 

5.0 FUTURE WORK 5-1

 

6.0 REFERENCES 6-1
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 3Q2013 Status Report Page viii September 2013 

Inside Tunnel Wells 

LIST OF TABLES 

Number Title Page

1.1 Current Status of USTs 1-2

2.1 Analytical Results for Groundwater Sampling (July 22 and 23, 2013) 2-5

3.1 Quality Control Results for Groundwater Sampling (July 22, 2013) 3-5

 

 

LIST OF FIGURES 

Number Title 

1 Site Location 

2 Site Layout 

 

 

APPENDICES 

Appendix Title 

A Groundwater Sampling Logs 

B Field Notes 

C Laboratory Reports 

D Historical Groundwater Exceedance Trends 

E Waste Disposal Manifest 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 3Q2013 Status Report Page ix September 2013 

Inside Tunnel Wells 

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS 

ACRONYMS/ 

ABBREVIATIONS DEFINITION/MEANING 

% percent 

bgs below ground surface 

BTEX benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene 

COPC Contaminant of Potential Concern 

DLNR State of Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources 

DOH State of Hawaii Department of Health 

DON Department of the Navy 

EAL Environmental Action Level 

EPA Environmental Protection Agency 

ESI Environmental Science International 

F-76 Marine Diesel Fuel 

ID Identification 

JBPHH Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam 

JP-5 Jet Fuel Propellant-5 

JP-8 Jet Fuel Propellant-8 

LCS Laboratory Control Sample 

LCSD Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate 

LOD Limit of Detection 

LOQ Limit of Quantitation 

μg/L micrograms per liter 

MS Matrix Spike 

MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate 

NAVFAC Naval Facilities Engineering Command 

NAVSUP FLC Naval Supply Systems Command Fleet Logistics Center 

PAH Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons 

PARCCS Precision, Accuracy, Representativeness, Completeness, Comparability, 

and Sensitivity 

pH hydrogen activity 

RHSF Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

RPD Relative Percent Difference 

SAP Sampling and Analysis Plan 

TEC The Environmental Company, Inc. 

TPH Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 

TPH-d Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as diesel 

TPH-g Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline 

U.S. United States of America 

UST Underground Storage Tank 

VOC Volatile Organic Compound 

WP Work Plan 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 3Q2013 Status Report Page x September 2013 

Inside Tunnel Wells 

This Page Intentionally Left Blank. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 3Q2013 Status Report ES-1 September 2013

Inside Tunnel Wells 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 

This quarterly groundwater monitoring report presents the results of the third quarter 2013 

groundwater sampling conducted on July 22 and 23, 2013, at the Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage 

Facility [RHSF], Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam [JBPHH], Hawaii. The RHSF is located in 

Halawa Heights on the Island of Oahu. There are 18 active and 2 inactive Underground Storage 

Tanks [USTs] located at the RHSF. The State of Hawaii Department of Health [DOH] Facility 

Identification [ID] number is 9-102271. The DOH Release ID numbers are 990051, 010011, and 

020028. 

The groundwater sampling was conducted as part of the long-term groundwater and soil vapor 

monitoring at the RHSF, under Naval Facilities Engineering Command [NAVFAC] Contract 

Number N62742-12-D-1853. The sampling was conducted in accordance with the approved 

Work Plan [WP]/Sampling and Analysis Plan [SAP] prepared by Environmental Science 

International [ESI]. 

On July 22 and 23, 2013, ESI personnel collected groundwater samples from five monitoring 

wells at the RHSF (wells RHMW01, RHMW02, RHMW03, RHMW05, and RHMW2254-01). A 

summary of the analytical results is provided below. 

 RHMW01 – Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as diesel [TPH-d] (99 micrograms per liter 

[μg/L]) and naphthalene (0.048 μg/L) were detected. None of the chemical constituents 

analyzed for were detected at concentrations above the DOH Environmental Action Levels 

[EALs]. 

 

 RHMW02 – TPH-d (2,500 μg/L), Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline [TPH-g] 

(55 μg/L), acenaphthene (0.52 μg/L), fluorene (0.23 μg/L), 1-methylnaphthalene (21 μg/L), 

2-methylnaphthalene (9.1 μg/L), naphthalene (73 μg/L), ethylbenzene (0.17 μg/L), and 

xylenes (0.45 μg/L), and dissolved lead (0.135 μg/L) were detected. TPH-d, 

1-methylnaphthalene, and naphthalene were detected at concentrations above the DOH 

EALs for both drinking water toxicity and gross contamination. 

 RHMW03 – TPH-d (48 μg/L) and naphthalene (0.064 μg/L) were detected. None of the 

chemical constituents analyzed for were detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

 RHMW05 – Naphthalene (0.033 μg/L) was detected. None of the chemical constituents 

analyzed for were detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

 RHMW2254-01 – Total lead (0.300 μg/L) and naphthalene (0.099 μg/L) were detected. 

None of the chemical constituents analyzed for were detected at concentrations above the 

DOH EALs. 

Since the wells were last sampled (April 2013), groundwater contaminant concentrations in four 

wells (RHMW01, RHMW03, RHMW05, and RHMW2254-01) remained at low concentrations 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 3Q2013 Status Report ES-2 September 2013

Inside Tunnel Wells 

and did not change significantly, or were not detected. Only the groundwater samples from 

RHMW02 showed concentrations of contaminants of potential concern [COPCs] exceeding the 

DOH EALs. 

TPH-d concentrations detected in well RHMW01 during the last sampling (April 2013) event 

increased above the DOH EALs for both drinking water toxicity and gross contamination for the 

first time since February 2012. During this round of sampling, TPH-d was detected at a 

concentration just below the DOH EAL for gross contamination, but well below the drinking 

DOH EALs. 

2-Methylnaphthalene concentrations detected in the primary and duplicate samples collected 

from well RHMW02 during this sampling event decreased to concentrations below the DOH 

EALs. TPH-d concentrations detected in the samples collected from well RHMW02 decreased, 

but still exceeded the EALs and were consistent with previous analytical data. This decrease is 

consistent with a decrease in TPH-d concentration in well RHMW01 during this event. 

With the exception of 2-methylnaphthalene, concentration of COPCs in well RHMW02 have not 

changed significantly. TPH-d, 1-methylnaphthalene, 2-methylnaphthalene, and naphthalene 

concentrations have been decreasing since groundwater monitoring was initiated in 2005. This 

is the first sampling event since July 2012 that 2-methylnaphthalene concentrations have been 

detected below both the drinking water toxicity and gross contamination DOH EALs. 

Based on the results of the groundwater monitoring, continuing the groundwater monitoring 

program at the RHSF is recommended. If TPH-d concentrations in well RHMW02 significantly 

increase, the monitoring frequency should be increased to monthly in accordance with the 

RHSF Groundwater Protection Plan. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 3Q2013 Status Report 1-1 September 2013

Inside Tunnel Wells 

SECTION 1 – INTRODUCTION 

This quarterly groundwater monitoring report presents the results of the third quarter 2013 

groundwater sampling conducted on July 22 and 23, 2013, at the RHSF, JBPHH. The RHSF is 

located in Halawa Heights on the Island of Oahu. The purpose of the sampling is to (1) assess 

the condition of groundwater beneath the RHSF with respect to chemical constituents 

associated with jet fuel propellant and marine diesel fuel, and (2) to ensure the Navy remains in 

compliance with DOH UST release response requirements as described in Hawaii 

Administrative Rules 11-281 Subchapter 7, Release Response Action. The DOH Facility ID 

number for the RHSF is 9-102271. The DOH Release ID numbers are 990051, 010011, and 

020028. 

The groundwater sampling was conducted as part of the long-term groundwater and soil vapor 

monitoring at the RHSF, under NAVFAC Contract Number N62742-12-D-1853. The sampling 

was conducted in accordance with the approved WP/SAP prepared by ESI (ESI, 2012). 

1.1 SITE DESCRIPTION

The RHSF is located on federal government land (zoned F1- Military and Federal), located in 

Halawa Heights, approximately 2.5 miles northeast of Pearl Harbor (Figure 1). It is located on a 

low ridge on the western edge of the Koolau Mountain Range that divides Halawa Valley from 

Moanalua Valley. The RHSF is bordered on the north by Halawa Correctional Facility and 

private businesses, on the west by the United States of America [U.S.] Coast Guard reservation, 

on the south by residential neighborhoods, and on the east by Moanalua Valley. A quarry is 

located less than a quarter mile away to the northwest. The RHSF occupies 144 acres of land 

and the majority of the site is at an elevation of approximately 200 to 500 feet above mean sea 

level. 

The RHSF contains 18 active and 2 inactive USTs that are operated by Naval Supply Systems 

Command Fleet Logistics Center [NAVSUP FLC] Pearl Harbor (formerly Fleet and Industrial 

Supply Center). Each UST has a capacity of approximately 12.5 million gallons. The RHSF is 

located approximately 100 feet above the basal aquifer. The USTs contain Jet Fuel Propellant-5 

[JP-5], Jet Fuel Propellant-8 [JP-8], and Marine Diesel Fuel [F-76]. The current status of the 

USTs are summarized in Table 1.1. 

Five groundwater monitoring wells (wells RHMW01, RHMW02, RHMW03, RHMW05, and 

RHMW2254-01) are located within the RHSF lower access tunnel (Figure 2). Two groundwater 

monitoring wells (wells HDMW2253-03 and OWDFMW01) are located outside of the RHSF 

tunnel system. Monitoring data for the two wells located outside the tunnel are included in a 

separate report. 

Monitoring wells RHMW01, RHMW02, RHMW03, and RHMW05 are located inside the 

underground tunnels. Monitoring well RHMW2254-01 is located inside the infiltration gallery of 

the Department of the Navy [DON] Well 2254-01. The DON Well 2254-01 is located 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 3Q2013 Status Report 1-2 September 2013

Inside Tunnel Wells 

approximately 2,400 feet downgradient of the USTs and provides approximately 24 percent [%] 

of the potable water to the Pearl Harbor System, which serves approximately 52,200 military 

customers. NAVFAC Public Works Department operates the infiltration gallery and DON Well 

2254-01. 

TABLE 1.1 

Current Status of the USTs 

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

July 2013 Quarterly Monitoring Report 

Tank Identification Fuel Type Status Capacity 

F-1 None Inactive 12.5 million gallons 

F-2 JP-8 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-3 JP-8 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-4 JP-8 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-5 JP-8 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-6 JP-8 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-7 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-8 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-9 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-10 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-11 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-12 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-13 F-76 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-14 F-76 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-15 F-76 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-16 F-76 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-17 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-18 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-19 None Inactive 12.5 million gallons 

F-20 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-76 Marine Diesel Fuel 

JP-5 Jet Fuel Propellant-5 

JP-8 Jet Fuel Propellant-8 

1.2 PHYSICAL SETTING

Climatological conditions in the area of the RHSF consist of warm to moderate temperatures 

and low to moderate rainfall. The RHSF is leeward of the prevailing northeasterly trade winds. 

The average annual precipitation is approximately 40 inches, which occurs mainly between 

November and April (State of Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources [DLNR], 

1986). Annual pan evaporation is approximately 75 inches (DLNR, 1985). Average 

temperatures range from the low 60’s to high 80’s (degrees Fahrenheit) (Atlas of Hawaii, 1983). 

Oahu consists of the eroded remnants of two shield volcanoes, Waianae and Koolau. The 

RHSF is located on the southwest flank of the Koolau volcanic shield. Lavas erupted during the 

shield-building phase of the volcano belong to the Koolau Volcanic Series (Stearns and Vaksvik, 

1935). Following formation of the Koolau shield, a long period of volcanic quiescence occurred, 

during which the shield was deeply eroded. Following this erosional period, eruptive activity 

resumed. Lavas and pyroclastic material erupted during this period belong to the Honolulu 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 3Q2013 Status Report 1-3 September 2013

Inside Tunnel Wells 

Volcanic Series (Stearns and Vaksvik, 1935). 

In the immediate area of the RHSF, Koolau Volcanic Series lavas dominate, although there are 

consolidated and unconsolidated non-calcareous deposits in the vicinity that consist of alluvium 

generated during erosion of the Koolau volcanic shield. South-southwest of the RHSF, and in 

isolated exposures to the west, are pyroclastic deposits formed during eruptions from three 

Honolulu Volcanic Series vents, Salt Lake, Aliamanu, and Makalapa (Stearns and Vaksvik, 

1935). Based on established geology and records of the drilled wells (Stearns and Vaksvik, 

1938), the RHSF is underlain by Koolau Volcanic Series basalts. The area of the RHSF is 

classified as Rock Land, where 25-90% of the land surface is covered by exposed rock and 

there are only shallow soils (Foote, et al., 1972). 

Groundwater in Hawaii exists in two principal types of aquifers. The first and most important 

type, in terms of drinking water resources, is the basal aquifer. The basal aquifer exists as a 

lens of fresh water floating on and displacing seawater within the pore spaces, fractures, and 

voids of the basalt that forms the underlying mass of each Hawaiian island. In parts of Oahu, 

groundwater in the basal aquifer is confined by the overlying caprock and is under pressure. 

Waters that flow freely to the surface from wells that tap the basal aquifer are referred to as 

artesian. 

The second type of aquifer is the caprock aquifer, which consists of various kinds of unconfined 

and semi-confined groundwater. Commonly, the caprock consists of a thick sequence of nearly 

impermeable clays, coral, and basalt, which separates the caprock aquifer from the basal 

aquifer. The impermeable nature of these materials and the artesian nature of the basal aquifer 

severely restrict the downward migration of groundwater from the upper caprock aquifer. In the 

area of the RHSF, there is no discernible caprock. 

Groundwater in the area of the RHSF is part of the Waimalu Aquifer System of the Pearl Harbor 

Aquifer Sector. The aquifer is classified as a basal, unconfined, flank-type; and is currently used 

as a drinking water source. The aquifer is considered fresh with less than 250 milligrams per 

liter of chloride and is considered an irreplaceable resource with a high vulnerability to 

contamination (Mink and Lau, 1990). 

The nearest drinking water supply well is DON Well 2254-01, located in the infiltration gallery 

within the RHSF. The DON Well 2254-01 is located approximately 2,400 feet downgradient of 

the USTs (Figure 2). 

1.3 BACKGROUND

The RHSF was constructed by the U.S. Government in the early 1940s. Twenty USTs and a 

series of tunnels were constructed. The USTs were constructed of steel and they currently 

contain JP-5, JP-8, and F-76. Several tanks in the past have stored DON special fuel oil, DON 

distillate, aviation gasoline, and motor gasoline (Environet, 2010). The fueling system is a selfcontained underground unit that was installed into native rock comprised primarily of basalt with 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 3Q2013 Status Report 1-4 September 2013

Inside Tunnel Wells 

some interbedded tuffs and breccias (Environet, 2010). Each UST measures approximately 245 

feet in height and 100 feet in diameter. The upper domes of the tanks lie at a depth varying 

between 100 feet and 200 feet below ground surface [bgs]. 

In 1998, Earth Tech conducted a Phase II remedial investigation/feasibility study for the Oily 

Waste Disposal Facility located within the RHSF. The study involved installing well 

OWDFMW01 (which was originally MW08) (Earth Tech, 1999). 

In February 2001, the DON installed groundwater monitoring well RHMW01 to monitor for 

contamination in the basal aquifer beneath the RHSF. Well RHMW01 was installed 

approximately 100 feet below grade within the lower access tunnel. The depth to water was 

measured at 86 feet below grade at the time of the well completion. In February 2001, a 

groundwater sample was collected from the well. Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons [TPH] and lead 

were detected in the samples. Lead was detected at a concentration above the DOH EAL (The 

Environmental Company, Inc. [TEC], 2009; DOH, 2000). 

In 2005, the RHSF groundwater monitoring program was initiated. It involved routine 

groundwater sampling of wells RHMW01 and RHMW2254-01. Samples were collected in 

February, June, September, and December of 2005. Lead was detected at concentrations 

above the DOH EAL in samples collected in February and June. The samples collected in 

February and June were not filtered prior to analysis, whereas the samples collected in 

September and December were filtered prior to analysis. Since the samples collected in 

February and June were not filtered prior to analysis, the lead results were not considered 

appropriate for a risk assessment (TEC, 2008). 

Between June and September 2005, TEC installed three groundwater monitoring wells (wells 

RHMW02, RHMW03, and RHMW04) within the RHSF (TEC, 2008). Well RHMW04 was 

installed upgradient of the USTs to provide background geochemistry information for water 

moving through the basal aquifer beneath the RHSF. Wells RHMW02 and RHMW03 were 

installed approximately 125 feet below grade within the RHSF lower tunnel and well RHMW04 

was installed to a depth of approximately 300 feet bgs outside of the RHSF tunnels. In 

September 2005, groundwater samples were collected from the three newly installed 

groundwater monitoring wells (wells RHMW02, RHMW03, and RHMW04) along with the two 

existing wells (wells RHMW01 and RHMW2254-01). The COPCs with concentrations exceeding 

DOH EALs are summarized below. 

 

 RHMW01 – TPH-d was detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL. 

 RHMW02 – TPH-g, TPH-d, naphthalene, trichloroethylene, 1-methylnaphthalene, and 

2-methylnaphthalene were detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

 RHMW03 – TPH-d was detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL. 

In 2006, TEC installed dedicated sampling pumps in the five wells (wells RHWM01, RHWM02, 

RHMW03, RHWM04,and RHMW2254-01). In July and December of 2006, groundwater 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 3Q2013 Status Report 1-5 September 2013

Inside Tunnel Wells 

samples were collected from the five wells. The COPCs with concentrations exceeding DOH 

EALs are summarized below. 

 RHMW01 – TPH-d and naphthalene were detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

 RHMW02 – TPH-g, TPH-d, and naphthalene were detected at concentrations above the 

DOH EALs. 

 RHMW03 – TPH-d was detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL. 

In 2007, groundwater samples were collected from the four wells RHWM01, RHWM02, 

RHMW03, and RHMW2254-01. Samples were collected in March, June, and September of 

2007. The COPCs with concentrations exceeding DOH EALs are summarized below. 

 RHMW01 – TPH-d was detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL. 

 RHMW02 – TPH-g, TPH-d, naphthalene, 1-methylnaphthalene, and 2-methylnaphthalene 

were detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

 RHMW03 – TPH-d was detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL. 

In 2008, groundwater samples were collected from wells RHWM01, RHWM02, RHMW03, and 

RHMW2254-01. Samples were collected in January, April, July, and October of 2008. The 

COPCs with concentrations exceeding DOH EALs are summarized below. In addition, a 

groundwater protection plan (TEC, 2008) was prepared. 

 RHMW01 – TPH-d was detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL. 

 RHMW02 – TPH-d, naphthalene, 1-methylnaphthalene, and 2-methylnaphthalene were 

detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

 RHMW03 – TPH-d was detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL. 

In April 2009, groundwater monitoring well RHMW05 was installed downgradient of the USTs, 

within the lower access tunnel between RHMW01 and RHMW2254-01. It was installed to 

identify the extent of contamination downgradient of the USTs. Well RHMW05 was added to the 

quarterly groundwater sampling program. In 2009, quarterly groundwater samples were collect 

from wells RHMW01, RHMW02, RHMW03, RHMW05, and RHMW2254-01. Samples were 

collected in February, May, July, and October of 2009. The COPCs with concentrations 

exceeding DOH EALs are summarized below. 

 RHMW01 – TPH-d and 1-methylnaphthalene were detected at concentrations above the 

DOH EAL. 

 RHMW02 – TPH-d, naphthalene, 1-methylnaphthalene, and 2-methylnaphthalene were 

detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

 RHMW03 – TPH-d was detected at a concentration above the DOH EAL. 

 RHMW05 – TPH-d was detected at a concentration above the DOH EAL. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 3Q2013 Status Report 1-6 September 2013

Inside Tunnel Wells 

In 2010, groundwater samples were collected from wells RHMW01, RHMW02, RHMW03, 

RHMW05, and RHMW2254-01. Samples were collected in January, April, July, and October. 

The COPCs with concentrations exceeding DOH EALs are summarized below. 

 RHMW01 – TPH-d was detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL. 

 RHMW02 – TPH-g, TPH-d, naphthalene, and 1-methylnaphthalene were detected at 

concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

 RHMW03 – TPH-d was detected at a concentration above the DOH EAL. 

 RHMW05 – TPH-d was detected at a concentration above the DOH EAL. 

In 2011, quarterly groundwater samples were collected from wells RHMW01, RHMW02, 

RHMW03, RHMW05, and RHMW2254-01. Samples were collected in January, April, July, and 

October. The COPCs with concentrations exceeding DOH EALs are summarized below. 

 RHMW01 – TPH-d was detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL. 

 RHMW02 – TPH-d, naphthalene, indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene, and 1-methylnaphthalene were 

detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

In 2012, quarterly groundwater samples were collected from wells RHMW01, RHMW02, 

RHMW03, RHMW05, and RHMW2254-01. Samples were collected in February, April, July, and 

November. The COPCs with concentrations exceeding DOH EALs are summarized below. 

 RHMW01 – TPH-d was detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL. 

 RHMW02 – TPH-d, TPH-g, naphthalene, 1-methylnaphthalene, and 2-methylnaphthalene 

were detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

In January 2013, quarterly groundwater samples were collected from wells RHMW01, 

RHMW02, RHMW03, RHMW05, and RHMW2254-01. The COPCs with concentrations 

exceeding DOH EALs are summarized below. 

 RHMW02 – TPH-d, TPH-g, naphthalene, 1-methylnaphthalene, and 2-methylnaphthalene 

were detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

In April 2013, quarterly groundwater samples were collected from wells RHMW01, RHMW02, 

RHMW03, RHMW05, and RHMW2254-01. The COPCs with concentrations exceeding DOH 

EALs are summarized below. 

 RHMW01 – TPH-d was detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL. 

 RHMW02 – TPH-d, naphthalene, 1-methylnaphthalene, and 2-methylnaphthalene 

were detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

1.3.1 Previous Reports 

The following groundwater monitoring reports were previously submitted to the DOH: 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 3Q2013 Status Report 1-7 September 2013

Inside Tunnel Wells 

1. Groundwater Sampling Report, First Quarter 2005 (submitted April 2005). 

2. Groundwater Sampling Report, Second Quarter 2005 (submitted August 2005). 

3. Groundwater Sampling Report, Third Quarter 2005 (submitted November 2005). 

4. Groundwater Sampling Report, Fourth Quarter 2005 (submitted February 2006). 

5. Groundwater Monitoring Results, July 2006 (submitted September 2006). 

6. Groundwater Monitoring Results, December 2006 (submitted January 2007). 

7. Groundwater Monitoring Results, March 2007 (submitted May 2007). 

8. Groundwater Monitoring Results, June 2007 (submitted August 2007). 

9. Groundwater Monitoring Results, September 2007 (submitted October 2007). 

10. Groundwater Monitoring Report, January 2008 (submitted March 2008). 

11. Groundwater Monitoring Report, April 2008 (submitted May 2008). 

12. Groundwater Monitoring Report, July 2008 (submitted October 2008). 

13. Groundwater Monitoring Report, October and December 2008 (submitted February 2009). 

14. Groundwater Monitoring Report, February 2009 (submitted May 2009). 

15. Groundwater Monitoring Report, May 2009 (submitted July 2009). 

16. Groundwater Monitoring Report, July 2009 (submitted September 2009). 

17. Groundwater Monitoring Report, October 2009 (submitted December 2009). 

18. Groundwater Monitoring Report, January, February, and March 2010 (submitted April 2010). 

19. Groundwater Monitoring Report, April 2010 (submitted May 2010). 

20. Groundwater Monitoring Report, July 2010 (submitted August 2010). 

21. Groundwater Monitoring Report, October 2010 (submitted December 2010). 

22. Groundwater Monitoring Report, January 2011 (submitted March 2011). 

23. Groundwater Monitoring Report, April 2011 (submitted June 2011). 

24. Groundwater Monitoring Report, July 2011 (submitted September 2011). 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 3Q2013 Status Report 1-8 September 2013

Inside Tunnel Wells 

25. Groundwater Monitoring Report, October 2011 (submitted December 2011). 

26. Groundwater Monitoring Report, January-February 2012 (submitted March 2012). 

27. Groundwater Monitoring Report, April 2012 (Submitted July 2012). 

28. Groundwater Monitoring Report, October 2012 (Submitted in January 2013). 

29. Groundwater Monitoring Report, January 2013 (Submitted in April 2013). 

30. Groundwater Monitoring Report, April 2013 (Submitted in July 2013). 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 3Q2013 Status Report 2-1 September 2013

Inside Tunnel Wells 

SECTION 2 – GROUNDWATER SAMPLING 

On July 22 and 23, 2013, ESI personnel collected groundwater samples from five monitoring 

wells at the RHSF (wells RHMW01, RHMW02, RHMW03, RHMW05, and RHMW2254-01). The 

samples were collected in accordance with DOH UST release response requirements (DOH, 

2000) and the RHSF Groundwater Protection Plan (TEC, 2008). Prior to purging and sampling, 

the depth to groundwater and the depth to the bottoms of the wells were measured using a 

Geotech oil/water interface probe. No measurable product, sheen, or petroleum hydrocarbon 

odor was detected in any of the wells with the exception of RHMW02. A slight petroleum 

hydrocarbon odor was noticed when collecting groundwater samples from RHMW02. 

2.1 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING

Prior to collecting groundwater samples, the monitoring wells were purged of water in the well 

casings. Each well contains a dedicated bladder pump which was used to purge the well and to 

collect samples. To operate the pump, a portable air compressor with an in-line filter was 

connected to a QED MP50 MicroPurge Basics Controller box, which was then connected to the 

pump. The compressor was turned on to power the pump and the controller was used to adjust 

the pumping rate to less than one liter of water per minute. 

Water quality parameters were monitored on a periodic basis during well purging. The water 

quality parameters that were measured included hydrogen activity [pH], temperature, 

conductivity, dissolved oxygen, and oxidation reduction potential. The water quality parameters 

were evaluated to assess whether the natural characteristics of the aquifer formation water were 

present within the monitoring wells before collecting the samples. At least four readings were 

collected during the purging process. Purging was considered complete when at least three 

consecutive water quality measurements stabilized within approximately 10%. The readings 

were recorded on groundwater monitoring logs. The groundwater monitoring logs are included 

in Appendix A. In addition, field notes were taken to document the sampling event. The field 

notes are included in Appendix B. 

When the water quality parameters stabilized, groundwater samples were collected from the 

wells using the bladder pumps. The groundwater samples were collected no more than two 

hours after purging was completed to decrease groundwater interaction with the monitoring well 

casing and atmosphere. Prior to collecting the sample, the water level in the monitoring wells 

was measured and recorded to ensure that water was not drawn down. The groundwater 

samples were collected at flow rates of approximately 0.10 to 0.33 liters per minute. Samples 

collected for dissolved lead analysis were filtered in the field using 0.45 micron filters. 

2.2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS

The samples were analyzed for TPH-d using U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [EPA] 

Method 8015M, TPH-g and Volatile Organic Compounds [VOCs] using EPA Method 8260B, 

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons [PAHs] using EPA Method 8270C SIM, dissolved lead using 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 3Q2013 Status Report 2-2 September 2013

Inside Tunnel Wells 

EPA Method 6020, and total lead using EPA Method 200.8. The sample collected from well 

RHMW2254-01 was analyzed for total lead (unfiltered) as DON Well 2254-01 is a drinking water 

supply well. The analytical results are summarized below and in Table 2.1. A copy of the 

laboratory report is included in Appendix C. 

 RHMW01 – TPH-d (99 μg/L) and naphthalene (0.048 μg/L) were detected. None of the 

chemical constituents analyzed for were detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

 RHMW02 – TPH-d (2,500 μg/L), TPH-g (55 μg/L), acenaphthene (0.52 μg/L), fluorene 

(0.23 μg/L), 1-methylnaphthalene (21 μg/L), 2-methylnaphthalene (9.1 μg/L), naphthalene 

(73 μg/L), ethylbenzene (0.17 μg/L), xylenes (0.45 μg/L), and dissolved lead (0.135 μg/L) 

were detected. TPH-d, 1-methylnaphthalene, and naphthalene were detected at 

concentrations above the DOH EALs for both drinking water toxicity and gross 

contamination. 

 RHMW03 – TPH-d (48 μg/L) and naphthalene (0.064 μg/L) were detected. None of the 

chemical constituents analyzed for were detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

 RHMW05 – Naphthalene (0.033 μg/L) was detected. None of the chemical constituents 

analyzed for were detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

 RHMW2254-01 – Total lead (0.300 μg/L) and naphthalene (0.099 μg/L) were detected. 

None of the chemical constituents analyzed for were detected at concentrations above the 

DOH EALs. 

2.3 GROUNDWATER CONTAMINANT TRENDS

Historical groundwater contaminant concentration trends of COPCs that exceeded the DOH 

EALs are presented in Appendix D. A summary of groundwater contaminant trends is provided 

below. 

 RHMW01 – COPCs detected during this round of quarterly sampling were consistent with 

historical data. TPH-d has historically been detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL 

for both drinking water toxicity and gross contamination. TPH-d concentrations showed a 

decreasing trend from 1,500 μg/L in February 2005 to 79 μg/L in February 2013. The TPH-d 

concentration increased to 340 μg/L in April 2013, but decreased to 99 μg/L during this 

sampling event below both DOH EALs. 

 RHMW02 – TPH-d, TPH-g, 1-methylnaphthalene, 2-methylnaphthalene, and naphthalene 

have historically been detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. TPH-d 

concentrations during the last several rounds of sampling have shown an increasing trend, 

but concentrations have been lower than the high of 5,420 μg/L in October 2008 and 

decreased slightly during this sampling event. 1-Methylnaphthalene and naphthalene 

concentrations remained consistent with the last event in April 2013. The concentration of 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 3Q2013 Status Report 2-3 September 2013

Inside Tunnel Wells 

2-Methylnaphthalene dropped below the DOH EALs. TPH-g concentrations remained 

consistent and below the DOH EALs during the last two rounds of sampling, indicating the 

high concentrations detected in October 2012 and January 2013 may be anomalous. 

 RHMW03 – COPCs detected during this round of quarterly sampling were consistent with 

historical data. TPH-d has historically been detected at concentrations above the DOH 

EALs; however, it has not been detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs since 

October 2010. 

 RHMW05 – COPCs detected during this round of quarterly sampling were consistent with 

historical data. TPH-d has historically been detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL 

for both drinking water toxicity and gross contamination; however, it has not been detected 

at concentrations above the DOH EALs since January 2010. 

 RHMW2254-01 – COPCs detected during this round of quarterly sampling were consistent 

with historical data. TPH-d was detected at a concentration above the DOH EAL for gross 

contamination in January 2008; however, it has not been detected at concentrations above 

the DOH EALs since then. 

Historical groundwater contaminants concentrations above the DOH EALs for both drinking 

water toxicity and gross contamination are presented in Appendix D. 

2.4 WASTE DISPOSAL

The purged groundwater and decontamination water generated during sampling of the inside 

tunnel wells was stored in a 55-gallon drum along with the purged water and decontamination 

water from the outside tunnel wells. The water was disposed of following receipt of the analytical 

results for the outside tunnel wells. The drum was stored onsite at Adit 3. On August 23, 2013, 

the drum of water was picked up by Pacific Commercial Services, LLC, and disposed of at 

Unitek Solvent Services, Inc. The waste disposal manifest is included in Appendix E. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 3Q2013 Status Report 2-4 September 2013

Inside Tunnel Wells 

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 

Red Hill LTM, 3Q2013 Status Report 2-5 Inside Tunnel Wells 

TABLE 2.1 

Analytical Results for Groundwater Sampling (July 22 and 23, 2013) 

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

July 2013 Quarterly Monitoring Report 

Method Chemical 

DOH EALs RHMW2254-01 (ES032) RHWM01 (ES028) RHMW02 (ES

Drinking Water 

Toxicity

Gross 

Contamination Results Q LOQ LOD DL Results Q LOQ LOD DL Results Q LOQ 

EPA 8015B TPH-d 190 100 N.D. U 50 20 15 99 HD 50 20 15 2,500 HD 50 EPA 8260B TPH-g 100 100 N.D. U 50 30 13 N.D.1 U 50 30 13 551 50 EPA 8270C 

Acenaphthene 370 20 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.021 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.021 0.52 0.2 Acenaphthylene 240 2,000 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.018 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.018 N.D. U 0.2 Anthracene 1,800 22 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.034 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.034 N.D. U 0.2 Benzo[a]anthracene 0.092 4.7 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.024 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.024 N.D. U 0.2 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 1,500 0.13 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.022 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.022 N.D. U 0.2 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.2 0.81 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.036 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.036 N.D. U 0.2 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.092 0.75 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.025 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.025 N.D. U 0.2 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.92 0.4 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.023 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.023 N.D. U 0.2 Chrysene 9.2 1 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.019 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.019 N.D. U 0.2 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 0.0092 0.52 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.027 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.027 N.D. U 0.2 Fluoranthene 1,500 130 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.027 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.027 N.D. U 0.2 Fluorene 240 950 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.024 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.024 0.23 0.2 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 0.092 0.095 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.022 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.022 N.D. U 0.2 1-Methylnaphthalene 4.7 10 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.028 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.028 21 2 2-Methylnaphthalene 24 10 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.026 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.026 9.1 0.2 Naphthalene 17 21 0.099 J 0.2 0.05 0.023 0.048 J 0.2 0.05 0.023 73 2 Phenanthrene 240 410 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.03 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.031 N.D. U 0.2 Pyrene 180 68 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.025 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.025 N.D. U 0.2 

EPA 8260B 

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 200 970 N.D. U 5 0.5 0.3 N.D. U 5 0.5 0.3 N.D. U 5 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 5 50,000 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.38 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.38 N.D. U 1 1,1-Dichloroethane 2.4 50,000 N.D. U 5 0.5 0.28 N.D. U 5 0.5 0.28 N.D. U 5 1,1-Dichloroethylene 7 1,500 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.43 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.43 N.D. U 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 0.6 50,000 N.D. U 5 1 0.64 N.D. U 5 1 0.64 N.D. U 5 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 70 3,000 N.D. U 5 1 0.5 N.D. U 5 1 0.5 N.D. U 5 1,2-Dibromo-3- chloropropane 0.04 10 N.D. U 10 2 1.2 N.D. U 10 2 1.2 N.D. U 10 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.04 50,000 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.24 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.24 N.D. U 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 600 10 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.46 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.46 N.D. U 1 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.15 7,000 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.24 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.24 N.D. U 1 1,2-Dichloropropane 5 10 N.D. U 5 0.5 0.42 N.D. U 5 0.5 0.42 N.D. U 5 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 180 5 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.4 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.4 N.D. U 1 1,3-Dichloropropene (total of cis/trans) 0.43 50,000 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.25 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.25 N.D. U 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 75 5 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.43 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.43 N.D. U 1 Acetone 22,000 20,000 N.D. U 20 10 6 N.D. U 20 10 6 N.D. U 20 Benzene 5 170 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.14 N.D.1 U 1 0.5 0.14 N.D.1 U 1 Bromodichloromethane 0.12 50,000 N.D. U 5 0.5 0.21 N.D. U 5 0.5 0.21 N.D. U 5 Bromoform 80 510 N.D. U 10 1 0.5 N.D. U 10 1 0.5 N.D. U 10 Bromomethane 8.7 50,000 N.D. U 20 5 3.9 N.D. U 20 5 3.9 N.D. U 20 Carbon Tetrachloride 5 520 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.23 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.23 N.D. U 1 Chlorobenzene 100 50 N.D. U 5 0.5 0.17 N.D. U 5 0.5 0.17 N.D. U 5 Chloroethane 21,000 16 N.D. U 10 5 2.3 N.D. U 10 5 2.3 N.D. U 10 Chloroform 70 2,400 N.D. U 5 0.5 0.46 N.D. U 5 0.5 0.46 N.D. U 5 Chloromethane 1.8 50,000 N.D. U 10 2 1.8 N.D. U 10 2 1.8 N.D. U 10 cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 70 50,000 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.48 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.48 N.D. U 1 Dibromochloromethane 0.16 50,000 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.25 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.25 N.D. U 1 Ethylbenzene 700 30 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.14 N.D.1 U 1 0.5 0.14 0.171 J 1 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.86 6 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.32 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.32 N.D. U 1 Methyl ethyl ketone (2-Butanone) 7,100 8,400 N.D. U 10 5.0 2.2 N.D. U 10 5.0 2.2 N.D. U 10 Methyl isobutyl ketone (4-Methyl-2-Pentanone) 2,000 1300 N.D. U 10 5.0 4.4 N.D. U 10 5.0 4.4 N.D. U 10 Methyl tert-butyl Ether 12 5 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.31 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.31 N.D. U 1 Methylene chloride 4.8 9,100 N.D. U 5 1.0 0.64 N.D. U 5 1.0 0.64 N.D. U 5 Styrene 100 10 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.17 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.17 N.D. U 1 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- 0.52 50,000 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.4 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.4 N.D. U 1 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- 0.067 500 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.41 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.41 N.D. U 1 Tetrachloroethylene 5 170 N.D. U 5 0.5 0.39 N.D. U 5 0.5 0.39 N.D. U 5 Toluene 1,000 40 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.24 N.D.1 U 1 0.5 0.24 N.D.1 U 1 trans-1,2- Dichloroethylene 100 260 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.37 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.37 N.D. U 1 Trichloroethylene 5 310 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.37 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.37 N.D. U 1 Vinyl chloride 2 3,400 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.3 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.3 N.D. U 1 Xylenes 10,000 20 N.D. U 11 1.5 0.23 N.D.1 U 1 0.5 0.23 0.451 J 11 

EPA 6020 Dissolved Lead 15 50,000 - - - - - N.D. U 1 0.2 0.0898 0.135 J 1 EPA 200.8 Total Lead 15 50,000 0.300 J 1.0 -* 0.0898 - - - - - - - - The data are in micrograms per liter (μg/L). Shaded values exceeded the DOH EALs. - Not Analyzed * This sample was analyzed by EPA Method 200.8 and therefore does not have an LOD LOD Limit of Detection 1 These results may be biased low due to exceeding the hold time by one day. LOQ Limit of Quantitation 

DL Detection Limit or Method Detection Limit (MDL) N.D. Not Detected DOH EALs DOH Tier 1 Environmental Action Levels for groundwater where groundwater is a current drinking water source and surface water is greater than 150 meters from the site (DOH, Fall 2011). Q Qualifiers EPA Environmental Protection Agency TPH-d Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as diesel HD The chromatographic pattern was inconsistent with the profile of the reference fuel standard. TPH-g Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline J Analyte was detected at a concentration below the LOQ and above the DL. Reported value is estimated. U Undetected at DL and is reported as less than the L
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 

Red Hill LTM, 3Q2013 Status Report 2-6 Inside Tunnel Wells 

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 3Q2013 Status Report 3-1 September 2013

Inside Tunnel Wells 

SECTION 3 – DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT 

A data quality assessment, which consists of a review of the overall groundwater sample 

collection and analysis process, was performed in order to determine whether the analytical 

data generated meets the quality objectives for the project. The data quality assessment was 

performed in accordance with the approved WP/SAP prepared by ESI (ESI, 2012). The field 

quality control program consisted of standardized sample collection and management 

procedures, and the collection of field duplicate samples, matrix spike samples, and trip blank 

samples. The laboratory quality assurance program consisted of the use of standard analytical 

methods and the preparation and analyses of Matrix Spike [MS]/Matrix Spike Duplicate [MSD] 

samples, surrogate spikes, blanks, and Laboratory Control Samples [LCSs]. 

3.1 Data Validation and Assessment 

The objective of data validation is to provide data of known quality for project decisions. Data 

quality is judged in terms of Precision, Accuracy, Representativeness, Completeness, 

Comparability, and Sensitivity [PARCCS]. A number of factors may affect the quality of data, 

including: sample collection methods, sample analysis methods, and adherence to established 

procedures for sample collection, preservation, management, shipment, and analysis. 

Precision 

Precision is defined as the reproducibility of replicate measurements. Precision is evaluated by 

Relative Percentage Difference [RPD] of field duplicates and laboratory LCS/Laboratory Control 

Sample Duplicates [LCSDs] or MS/MSD results. Field duplicate and MS/MSD samples were 

collected at a rate of approximately 10% of primary samples. Field duplicates were sent to the 

laboratory along with the primary samples. 

The RPDs of primary and field duplicate samples are provided in Table 3.1. With the exception 

of 2-methylnaphthalene, all duplicate RPDs are less than 20% (below 50% as recommended in 

the NAVFAC Project Procedures Manual [DON 2007]), and therefore, the data precision is 

considered acceptable. The concentration of 2-methylnaphthalene detected in the primary 

sample ES029 (9.1 μg/L) was close to the DOH EAL for gross contamination (10 μg/L). 

However, the concentration detected in the field duplicate sample ES030 (6.6 μg/L) was well 

below the DOH EALs. Because of this and the fact that 1-methylnaphthalene and TPH-d were 

detected in sample ES029 at concentrations exceeding the DOH EALs, the high RPD is unlikely 

to affect data usability. 

The RPD of the MS/MSD results for 2-methylnaphthalene was above the acceptable maximum 

of 20%. This is in line with the field duplicate sample RPD results. Also, the high sample 

concentration in the MS/MSD samples relative to the spike amounts, likely resulted in the low 

precision of the recovery. All other RPDs for MS/MSD and LCS/LCSD pairs were within the 

acceptance range. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 3Q2013 Status Report 3-2 September 2013

Inside Tunnel Wells 

Accuracy 

Accuracy is defined as the degree of conformity of a measurement to a standard or true value. 

Accuracy is evaluated through measurement of the percent recovery of an analyte in a 

reference standard or spiked sample. Accuracy limits for surrogates, laboratory control spike, 

MS, and MSD samples are established by the individual laboratory. 

Between July 2006 and July 2010, naphthalene was analyzed for by both EPA Methods 8260B 

and 8270C, and both results were reported. In September 2005 and in all data beginning in 

October 2010, only results using EPA Method 8270C were reported. Naphthalene has 

historically only been detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs in well RHMW02. In this 

well, concentrations of naphthalene detected in each sample by EPA Method 8260B were 

generally two to three times higher than those detected by EPA Method 8270C. We assume this 

is due to the better preservation of VOCs associated with the use of EPA Method 8260B. This 

suggests that the naphthalene results provided by EPA Method 8270C may be biased low. 

Since October 2012, naphthalene concentrations in RHMW02 have exceeded DOH EALs for 

both gross contamination and drinking water toxicity. The naphthalene concentration detected in 

July 2012 (17 μg/L) was equal to the DOH EAL for drinking water (17 μg/L) but below the DOH 

EAL for gross contamination (21 μg/L); it is possible that accounting for the low bias, the actual 

naphthalene concentration detected during this event exceeded both EALs. Naphthalene 

concentrations between April 2011 and April 2012 were all an order of magnitude below both 

EALs, and it is unlikely that decisions based on these data are significantly affected by the low 

bias 

Results for TPH-d in samples ES028, ES029, ES030, and ES031 were flagged “HD.” The 

laboratory indicated a mismatch between the calibration standard and the TPH-d 

chromatographic profile. Mismatches of this type are not uncommon. The chromatograms are 

not part of the standard laboratory package and were not reviewed by ESI. 

All surrogate spike recoveries for analyzed constituents were within acceptable percent 

recovery limits. All LCS recoveries were within recovery limits. Naphthalene, 

2-methylnaphthalene and 1-methylnaphthalene concentrations for ES029, the primary sample 

on which the MS/MSD were performed, were significantly higher than the added spike 

concentration, which prevented an accurate evaluation of the MS/MSD recovery for these 

analytes. 

All other MS and MSD recoveries were within acceptable recovery limits, therefore, the data 

accuracy for this monitoring event is considered acceptable. 

Representativeness 

Representativeness is the degree that data accurately and precisely represents a characteristic 

of a population, parameter variations at a sampling point, or an environmental condition. 

Representativeness was achieved by conducting sampling in compliance with the sample 

collection procedures described in the WP/SAP (ESI, 2012). 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 3Q2013 Status Report 3-3 September 2013

Inside Tunnel Wells 

Representativeness is also evaluated via compliance with established sample holding time and 

sample preservation, and through the analysis of blank samples, including method blank and 

trip blank samples. The hold time for VOC/TPH-g analysis for samples ES028, ES029, ES030, 

and ES031 were exceeded by one day. According to Standard Operative Procedure II-B, 

Standard and Full Data Validation Procedure for GC/MS Volatile Organics by SW-846 8260B, in 

the Navy Project Procedure Manual, the hold time exceedance only affects aromatic volatiles 

(benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene [BTEX] compounds and the BTEX portion of 

TPH-g) (DoN 2007). A footnote has been added to the affected results in Tables 2-1 and 3-1 to 

indicate a possible low bias; however, due to the low BTEX concentrations detected during this 

event and in previous events, this is unlikely to affect project decisions. It is unlikely that the 

samples were significantly affected by this delay in analysis and therefore, the groundwater 

sample data are considered representative of the groundwater quality on site. All other sample 

holding time and sample preservation were in compliance with EPA guidance. 

For this sampling event, one trip blank was collected. TPH-g (21 μg/L) was detected in the trip 

blank at a concentration below the limit of detection [LOD]. TPH-g was detected in samples 

ES029 and ES030. In ES029 and ES030, the TPH-g is likely attributable to the gasoline-range 

organics associated with the high concentrations of TPH-d and is consistent with TPH-g 

concentrations detected during the last sampling event. However, concentrations of TPH-g 

detected in the samples were no more than approximately half of the EAL, and it is unlikely the 

contamination in the trip blank significantly affects data usability. Therefore, the groundwater 

sample data are considered representative of the groundwater quality on site. The quality 

control results are provided in Table 3.1. 

Completeness 

Completeness is defined as the overall percentage of valid analytical results (including 

estimated results) compared to the total number of analytical results reported by the analytical 

laboratory. No data were rejected for this project, and therefore the completeness goal for this 

project (90%), was successfully met. 

Comparability 

Comparability expresses the confidence with which one data set can be compared to another 

data set. Comparability can be related to accuracy and precision because these quantities are 

measures of data reliability. Data, with acceptable precision and accuracy, are considered 

comparable if collection techniques, analytical procedures, methods and reporting are 

equivalent. 

Between July 2006 and July 2010, naphthalene was analyzed for by both EPA Methods 8260B 

and 8270C, and both results were reported. In September 2005 and in all data beginning in 

October 2010, only results using EPA Method 8270C were reported. In general, EPA Method 

8260B resulted in higher, and as discussed above likely more accurate, results than EPA 

Method 8270C. However, for the sake of comparability with results from recent events, EPA 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 3Q2013 Status Report 3-4 September 2013

Inside Tunnel Wells 

Method 8270C was used for naphthalene analysis in this event. Consequently, the low bias 

associated with Method 8270C should be considered when making project decisions. 

All TPH-g data through July 2010 were analyzed by EPA Method 8015; beginning in October 

2010, EPA Method 8260B was used. There was no event where both methods were used; 

consequently, there is no way to directly compare the results obtained by method and to assess 

potential bias. However, there is no reason to believe that using either method should bias the 

data, and the TPH-g data for all events should be comparable. 

Other than the naphthalene bias discussed above, no issues with comparability were identified. 

The results are considered comparable within this data set and with the data collected from 

recent sampling events. 

Sensitivity 

The limits of quantitation [LOQs] are established by the laboratory based on the LODs or 

instrument detection limits, historical data, and EPA limits established for the methods. The 

LOQs for samples may require adjustment due to matrix interference or if high levels of target 

analytes necessitate dilution before analysis. Matrix interference and sample dilutions have the 

effect of increasing the LOQs. Laboratory LODs and LOQs for several analytes differed from the 

LODs and LOQs in the WP/SAP because the laboratory updates them quarterly and in some 

cases, dilution was necessary due to the presence of high concentrations of analytes. 

LODs and LOQs for several analytes were greater than the DOH EALs (as stated in the 

WP/SAP), and therefore it is not possible to determine whether the analytes are present at 

concentrations greater than or equal to the DOH EALs. As suggested by the DOH Technical 

Guidance Manual, when the LOQ exceeds the DOH EAL, the project action level will be the 

LOQ for these analytes. The affected analytes for this monitoring event are 1,1-dichloroethane, 

1,2,3-trichloropropane, 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane, 1,2-dibromoethane, 1,2-dichloroethane, 

1,3-dichloropropene, bromodichloromethane, bromomethane, chloromethane, dibromochloromethane, hexachlorobutadiene, methylene chloride, 1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2-

tetrachloroethane, benzo[a]anthracene, benzo[g,h,i]perylene, benzo[b]fluoranthene, 

benzo[k]fluoranthene, dibenzo[a,h]anthracene, and ideno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene. 

3.2 Data Assessment and Usability Conclusions 

The PARCCS criteria were evaluated, and with a few exceptions, all criteria were met. TPH-g 

contamination in the trip blank shows that there may be a slight high bias in the TPH-g 

groundwater sample results; however, it is unlikely that this affects the usability of the data for 

making project decisions. Other analytes that had issues causing concentrations to be biased 

high or low were either not detected in groundwater samples, or were detected at 

concentrations well below project action levels. The data assessment concludes that all data 

generated during this event are usable for the intended purpose. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 

Red Hill LTM, 3Q2013 Status Report 3-5 Inside Tunnel Wells 

TABLE 3.1 

Quality Control Results for Groundwater Sampling (July 22, 2013) 

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

July 2013 Quarterly Monitoring Report 

Method Chemical Constituent 

DOH EALs RHMW02 (ES029) RHMW02 (ES030) (DUP) 

Drinking Water 

Toxicity 

Gross 

Contamination Result Q LOQ LOD DL Result Q LOQ LO

EPA 8015B TPH-d 190 100 2,500 HD 50 20 15 2,600 HD 50 2EPA 8260B TPH-g 100 100 551 50 30 13 611 50 3EPA 8270C 

Acenaphthene 370 20 0.52 0.2 0.05 0.021 0.51 0.2 0.Acenaphthylene 240 2,000 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.018 N.D. U 0.2 0.Anthracene 1,800 22 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.034 N.D. U 0.2 0.Benzo[a]anthracene 0.092 4.7 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.024 N.D. U 0.2 0.Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 1,500 0.13 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.022 N.D. U 0.2 0.Benzo[a]pyrene 0.2 0.81 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.036 N.D. U 0.2 0.Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.092 0.75 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.025 N.D. U 0.2 0.Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.92 0.4 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.023 N.D. U 0.2 0.Chrysene 9.2 1 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.019 N.D. U 0.2 0.Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 0.0092 0.52 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.027 N.D. U 0.2 0.Fluoranthene 1,500 130 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.027 N.D. U 0.2 0.Fluorene 240 950 0.23 0.2 0.05 0.024 0.22 0.2 0.Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 0.092 0.095 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.022 N.D. U 0.2 0.1-Methylnaphthalene 4.7 10 21 2 0.5 0.28 18 2 02-Methylnaphthalene 24 10 9.1 0.2 0.05 0.026 6.6 0.2 0.Naphthalene 17 21 73 2 0.5 0.23 67 2 0Phenanthrene 240 410 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.03 N.D. U 0.2 0.Pyrene 180 68 N.D. U 0.2 0.05 0.025 N.D. U 0.2 0.

EPA 8260B 

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 200 970 N.D. U 5 0.5 0.3 N.D. U 5 01,1,2-Trichloroethane 5 50,000 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.38 N.D. U 1 01,1-Dichloroethane 2.4 50,000 N.D. U 5 0.5 0.28 N.D. U 5 01,1-Dichloroethylene 7 1,500 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.43 N.D. U 1 01,2,3-Trichloropropane 0.6 50,000 N.D. U 5 1 0.64 N.D. U 5 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 70 3,000 N.D. U 5 1 0.5 N.D. U 5 1 1,2-Dibromo-3- chloropropane 0.04 10 N.D. U 10 2 1.2 N.D. U 10 2 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.04 50,000 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.24 N.D. U 1 01,2-Dichlorobenzene 600 10 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.46 N.D. U 1 01,2-Dichloroethane 0.15 7,000 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.24 N.D. U 1 01,2-Dichloropropane 5 10 N.D. U 5 0.5 0.42 N.D. U 5 01,3-Dichlorobenzene 180 5 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.4 N.D. U 1 01,3-Dichloropropene (total of cis/trans) 0.43 50,000 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.25 N.D. U 1 01,4-Dichlorobenzene 75 5 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.43 N.D. U 1 0Acetone 22,000 20,000 N.D. U 20 10 6 N.D. U 20 1Benzene 5 170 N.D.1 U 1 0.5 0.14 N.D.1 U 1 0Bromodichloromethane 0.12 50,000 N.D. U 5 0.5 0.21 N.D. U 5 0Bromoform 80 510 N.D. U 10 1 0.5 N.D. U 10 1 Bromomethane 8.7 50,000 N.D. U 20 5 3.9 N.D. U 20 5 Carbon Tetrachloride 5 520 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.23 N.D. U 1 0Chlorobenzene 100 50 N.D. U 5 0.5 0.17 N.D. U 5 0Chloroethane 21,000 16 N.D. U 10 5 2.3 N.D. U 10 5 Chloroform 70 2,400 N.D. U 5 0.5 0.46 N.D. U 5 0Chloromethane 1.8 50,000 N.D. U 10 2 1.8 N.D. U 10 2 cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 70 50,000 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.48 N.D. U 1 0Dibromochloromethane 0.16 50,000 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.25 N.D. U 1 0Ethylbenzene 700 30 0.171 J 1 0.5 0.14 0.191 J 1 0Hexachlorobutadiene 0.86 6 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.32 N.D. U 1 0Methyl ethyl ketone (2-Butanone) 7,100 8,400 N.D. U 10 5.0 2.2 N.D. U 10 5Methyl isobutyl ketone (4-Methyl-2-Pentanone) 2,000 1300 N.D. U 10 5.0 4.4 N.D. U 10 5Methyl tert-butyl Ether 12 5 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.31 N.D. U 1 0Methylene chloride 4.8 9,100 N.D. U 5 1.0 0.64 N.D. U 5 1Styrene 100 10 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.17 N.D. U 1 0Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- 0.52 50,000 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.4 N.D. U 1 0Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- 0.067 500 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.41 N.D. U 1 0Tetrachloroethylene 5 170 N.D. U 5 0.5 0.39 N.D. U 5 0Toluene 1,000 40 N.D.1 U 1 0.5 0.24 N.D.1 U 1 0trans-1,2- Dichloroethylene 100 260 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.37 N.D. U 1 0Trichloroethylene 5 310 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.37 N.D. U 1 0Vinyl chloride 2 3,400 N.D. U 1 0.5 0.3 N.D. U 1 0Xylenes 10,000 20 0.451 J 11 1.5 0.23 0.501 J 11 1

EPA 6020 Lead 15 50,000 0.135 J 1 0.2 0.0898 N.D. U 1 0The data are in micrograms per liter (μg/L). Shaded values exceeded the DOH EALs. - Not Analyzed LOQ Limit of Quantitation 1 These results may be biased low due to exceeding the hold time by one day. NA Both results for duplicate pair were non-detect, no RP

DOH EALs DOH Tier 1 Environmental Action Levels for groundwater where groundwater is a current drinking water source and surface water is greater than 150 meters from the site (DOH, Fall 2011). N.D. Not Detected DL Detection Limit or Method Detection Limit (MDL) Q Qualifiers EPA Environmental Protection Agency TPH-g Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline HD The chromatographic pattern was inconsistent with the profile of the reference fuel standard. TPH-d Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as diesel J Analyte was detected at a concentration below the LOQ and above the DL. Reported value is estimated. U Undetected at DL and is reported as less than the LOLOD Limit of Detection 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 

Red Hill LTM, 3Q2013 Status Report 3-6 Inside Tunnel Wells 

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 3Q2013 Status Report 

Inside Tunnel Wells 

4-1 September 2013 

SECTION 4 – SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

On July 22 and 23, 2013, ESI personnel collected groundwater samples from five monitoring 

wells at the RHSF (wells RHMW01, RHMW02, RHMW03, RHMW05, and RHMW2254-01). 

The groundwater sampling was conducted as part of the long-term groundwater and soil vapor 

monitoring at the RHSF, under NAVFAC Contract Number N62742-12-D-1853. The sampling 

was conducted in accordance with the approved WP/SAP prepared by ESI. A summary of the 

analytical results is provided below. 

 RHMW01 – TPH-d (99 μg/L) and naphthalene (0.048 μg/L) were detected. None of the 

chemical constituents analyzed for were detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

 RHMW02 – TPH-d (2,500 μg/L), TPH-g (55 μg/L), acenaphthene (0.52 μg/L), fluorene 

(0.23 μg/L), 1-methylnaphthalene (21 μg/L), 2-methylnaphthalene (9.1 μg/L), naphthalene 

(73 μg/L), ethylbenzene (0.17 μg/L), xylenes (0.45 μg/L), and dissolved lead (0.135 μg/L) 

were detected. TPH-d, 1-methylnaphthalene, and naphthalene were detected at 

concentrations above the DOH EALs for both drinking water toxicity and gross 

contamination. 

 

 RHMW03 – TPH-d (48 μg/L) and naphthalene (0.064 μg/L) were detected. None of the 

chemical constituents analyzed for were detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

 RHMW05 – Naphthalene (0.033 μg/L) was detected. None of the chemical constituents 

analyzed for were detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

 RHMW2254-01 – Total lead (0.300 μg/L) and naphthalene (0.099 μg/L) were detected. 

None of the chemical constituents analyzed for were detected at concentrations above the 

DOH EALs. 

Groundwater Contaminant Trends 

 RHMW01 – COPCs detected during this round of quarterly sampling were consistent with 

historical data. TPH-d has historically been detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL 

for both drinking water toxicity and gross contamination. TPH-d concentrations showed a 

decreasing trend from 1,500 μg/L in February 2005 to 79 μg/L in February 2013. The TPH-d 

concentration increased to 340 μg/L in April 2013, but decreased to 99 μg/L during this 

sampling event below both DOH EALs. 

 RHMW02 – TPH-d, TPH-g, 1-methylnaphthalene, 2-methylnaphthalene, and naphthalene 

have historically been detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. TPH-d 

concentrations during the last several rounds of sampling have shown an increasing trend, 

but concentrations have been lower than the high of 5,420 μg/L in October 2008 and 

decreased slightly during this sampling event. 1-Methylnaphthalene concentrations 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 3Q2013 Status Report 

Inside Tunnel Wells 

4-2 September 2013 

remained consistent with the last event in April 2013. TPH-g concentrations remained below 

the DOH EALs during the last two rounds of sampling, indicating the high concentrations 

detected in October 2012 and January 2013 may be anomalous. Naphthalene 

concentrations decreased slightly since the last event in April 2013. 

 RHMW03 – COPCs detected during this round of quarterly sampling were consistent with 

historical data. TPH-d has historically been detected at concentrations above the DOH 

EALs; however, it has not been detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs since 

October 2010. 

 RHMW05 – COPCs detected during this round of quarterly sampling were consistent with 

historical data. TPH-d has historically been detected at concentrations above the DOH EAL 

for both drinking water toxicity and gross contamination; however, it has not been detected 

at concentrations above the DOH EALs since January 2010. 

 RHMW2254-01 – COPCs detected during this round of quarterly sampling were consistent 

with historical data. TPH-d was detected at a concentration above the DOH EAL for gross 

contamination in January 2008; however, it has not been detected at concentrations above 

the DOH EALs since then. 

Conclusions and Recommendations 

Since the wells were last sampled (April 2013), groundwater contaminant concentrations in four 

wells (RHMW01, RHMW03, RHMW05, and RHMW2254-01) remained at low concentrations 

and did not change significantly, or were not detected. Only the groundwater samples from 

RHMW02 had concentrations of COPCs exceeding the DOH EALs. 

TPH-d concentrations detected in well RHMW01 during the last sampling (April 2013) event 

increased above the DOH EALs for both drinking water toxicity and gross contamination for the 

first time since February 2012. During this round of sampling, TPH-d was detected at a 

concentration just below the DOH EAL for gross contamination, but well below the drinking 

DOH EALs. 

2-Methylnaphthalene concentrations detected in the primary and duplicate samples collected 

from well RHMW02 during this sampling event decreased to concentrations below the DOH 

EALs. TPH-d concentrations detected in the samples collected from well RHMW02 decreased, 

but still exceeded the EALs and were consistent with previous analytical data. This decrease is 

consistent with a decrease in TPH-d concentration in well RHMW01 during this event. 

With the exception of 2-methylnaphthalene, concentration of COPCs in well RHMW02 have not 

changed significantly. TPH-d, 1-methylnaphthalene, 2-methylnaphthalene, and naphthalene 

concentrations have been decreasing since groundwater monitoring was initiated in 2005. This 

is the first sampling event since July 2012 that 2-methylnaphthalene concentrations have been 

detected below both the drinking water toxicity and gross contamination DOH EALs. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 3Q2013 Status Report 

Inside Tunnel Wells 

4-3 September 2013 

Based on the results of the groundwater monitoring, continuing the groundwater monitoring 

program at the RHSF is recommended. If TPH-d concentrations in well RHMW02 significantly 

increase, the monitoring frequency should be increased to monthly in accordance with the 

RHSF Groundwater Protection Plan. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 3Q2013 Status Report 

Inside Tunnel Wells 

4-4 September 2013 

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 3Q2013 Status Report 

Inside Tunnel Wells 

5-1 September 2013

SECTION 5 – FUTURE WORK 

GROUNDWATER SAMPLING

Future work includes the fourth quarter 2013 groundwater monitoring which is scheduled for 

October 2013. It is anticipated that the quarterly groundwater monitoring status report will be 

submitted in November 2013. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 3Q2013 Status Report 

Inside Tunnel Wells 

5-2 September 2013

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 3Q2013 Status Report 

Inside Tunnel Wells 

6-1 September 2013

SECTION 6 – REFERENCES 

Atlas of Hawaii, 1983, Department of Geography, University of Hawaii Press. 

DLNR, 1985, Pan Evaporation: State of Hawai’i 1894-1983: Report R74, Division of Water and 

Land Development, August 1995. 

DLNR, 1986, Rainfall Atlas of Hawaii: Report R76, Division of Water and Land Development, 

June 1986. 

DOH, 2000, Hawaii Department of Health, Technical Guidance Manual for Underground 

Storage Tank Closure and Release Response, March 2000. 

DOH, 2011, Screening for Environmental Hazards at Sites with Contaminated Soil and 

Groundwater, Hawai'i Department of Health, Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response, 

December 2011. 

DON, 2007, Project Procedures Manual, U.S. Navy Installation Restoration Program, NAVFAC 

Pacific, Prepared for Pacific Division, Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC Pacific), 

February 2007. 

Earth Tech, 1999, Remedial Investigation, Phase II Technical Report, Red Hill Oily Waste 

Disposal Facility, Halawa, Oahu, Hawaii, Prepared for Naval Facilities Engineering Command, 

Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, 1999. 

Environet, 2010, Work Plan, Long-Term Monitoring, Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Pearl 

Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii, September 2010. 

ESI, 2012, Work Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Pearl 

Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii, October 2012. 

ESI, 2013a, Fourth Quarter 2012 - Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Inside Tunnel 

Wells, Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Pearl Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii, January 2013. 

ESI, 2013b, First Quarter 2013 - Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Inside Tunnel Wells, 

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Pearl Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii, April 2013. 

ESI, 2013c, Second Quarter 2013 - Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Inside Tunnel 

Wells, Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Pearl Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii, July 2013. 

Foote et al., 1972, Soil Survey of the Islands of Kauai, Oahu, Maui, Molokai, and Lanai, State of 

Hawaii. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 3Q2013 Status Report 

Inside Tunnel Wells 

6-2 September 2013

Mink, J. F. and Lau, L. S., 1990, Aquifer Identification and Classification for Oahu: Groundwater 

Protection Strategy for Hawaii: Water Resources Research Center Technical Report No. 179, 

February 1990. 

Stearns, H. T. and Vaksvik, K. N., 1935, Geology and Groundwater Resources of the Island of 

Oahu, Hawaii: Hawaii Div. Hydrogr. Bull. 

Stearns, H. T. and Vaksvik, K. N., 1938, Records of the Drilled Wells on the Island of Oahu, 

Hawaii: Hawaii Div. Hydrogr. Bull. 4, 213 p. 

TEC, 2008, Final Groundwater Protection Plan, Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility, Prepared for 

Navy Region Hawaii, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, January 2008. 

TEC, 2009, Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report, Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility, Prepared 

for Navy Region Hawaii, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, September 2009. 
FIGURES 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
KAENA POINT KAHUKU MAKAHA MAILI NANAKULI WAIANAE BARBERS POINT EWA BEACH HONOLULU INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WAIKIKI DIAMOND HICKAM AFB KAPOLEI EWA MOKULEIA HALEIWA WAIMEA POINT LAIE PUNALUU KAAAWA WAIAHOLE KANEOHE BAY KANEOHE MOKAPU KAILUA WAIMANALO MAKAPUU POINT HAWAII KAHALA KAI HONOLULU WAHIAWA SCHOFIELD BARRACKS PEARL CITY 83 930 803 99 80 780 83 61 63 78 72 61 83 836 76 63 780 93 930 750 99 H3 H1 H1 H1 H2 (RESIDENTIAL HOUSING) 

LAWA 

ONAL 

ILITY NAVY FIRING RANGE RED HILL BULK FUEL STORAGE FACILITY 

GRAPHIC SCALE 900 0 900 Scale in Feet The accuracy of this document is limited to the quality and scale of the source information. This document is not a legal representation of an engineered survey. NOTES SOURCES Pearl Harbor Base Map Navy GIS files PROJECT LOCATION FIGURE 1 SITE LOCATION GROUNDWATER MONITORING RED HILL BULK FUEL STORAGE FACILITY NAVAL SUPPLY SYSTEM COMMAND (NAVSUP) FLEET LOGISTICS CENTER JBPHH, OAHU, HAWAII
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
SVMP04 SVMP06 SVMP12 SVMP14 SVMP16 SVMP18 SVMP20 SVMP17 SVMP15 SVMP11 SVMP09 SVMP07 SVMP05 SVMP03 (RESIDENTIAL HOUSING) RED HILL BULK FUEL STORAGE FACILITY SVMP13 SVMP08 HALAWA 

CTIONAL 

ACILITY NAVY FIRING RANGE 

SVMP02 SVMP10 

HDMW2253-03 

RHMW05 RHMW01 RHMW02 RHMW03 RHMW04 GRAPHIC SCALE 1,200 0 1,200 Scale in Feet The accuracy of this document is limited to the quality and scale of the source information. This document is not a legal representation of an engineered survey. NOTES RED HILL BULK FUEL STORAGE FACILITY HALAWA CORRECTIONAL FACILITY HALAWA STREAM BUILDING ROAD ABOVEGROUND STORAGE TANK WATER TANK SOIL VAPOR MONITORING POINT GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL LOCATED INSIDE TUNNEL GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL LOCATED OUTSIDE TUNNEL BOARD OF WATER SUPPLY PUMP STATION LEGEND SOURCES Pearl Harbor Base Map Navy GIS files FIGURE 2 SITE LAYOUT GROUNDWATER MONITORING RED HILL BULK FUEL STORAGE FACILITY NAVAL SUPPLY SYSTEM COMMAND (NAVSUP) FLEET LOGISTICS CENTER JBPHH, OAHU, HAWAII
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
APPENDIX A 

Groundwater Sampling Logs 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Groundwater Sampling Log

Well ID: Location: Project No.:

Initial Water Level: Time:

Total Depth of Well: Personnel Involved:

Length of Saturated Zone: Weather Conditions:

Volume of Water to be Removed: Method of Removal:

Water Level After Purging: Pumping Rate:

Well Purge Data:

Sample Withdrawal Method:

Appearance of Sample:

Color:

Turbidity:

Sediment:

Other:

Laboratory Analysis Parameters and Preservatives:

Number and Types of Sample Containers:

Sample Identification Numbers:

Decontamination Procedures:

Notes:

Sampled by:

Sampled Delivered to: Transporters:

Date: Time: 7/23/2013 1400

Bladder Pump

Triple Rinsed

YSI did not have salinity parameter.

Branden Ibara, Tina Alder

Calscience Environmental Lab FedEx

None

TPH-d - 8015; TPH-g, VOCs - 8260; PAHs - 8270c sim;

lead - 6020

6 - 40ml VOAs, 2 - 1L amber jar, 1 - 500ml amber jar, 1 - 250ml HDPE

ES028 [0920]

Clear

Low

None

99.2

100.9

118.3

112.7

109.3

- 107.3

25.67 -

-

-

-

-

24.27

24.31

24.32

24.40

24.59

0.46

3.31

0.89

0.74

0.79

0.48

0.317

0.317

0.314

0.310

0.0 L

1.0 L

2.0 L

3.0 L

4.0 L

5.0 L

900

907

915

922

84.35 ft 0.10 L/min

-

-

835

845

8.70

7.12

0.294

0.301

Salinity

Redox (ORP) 

(mV)

Capacity of Casing (Gallons/Linear Feet)

2"-0.16• 4"-0.65 • 8"-2.61 • 10"-4.08 • 12"-5.87

6.89

7.19

6.90

6.84

97.40 ft

Time

Volume 

Removed pH

Conductivity 

(mS/cm) DO (mg/l)

Branden Ibara, Tina Alder

-

Bladder Pump

Temperature

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 112066

84.29 ft Date: 7/22/2013 810

RHMW01
Groundwater Sampling Log

Well ID: Location: Project No.:

Initial Water Level: Time:

Total Depth of Well: Personnel Involved:

Length of Saturated Zone: Weather Conditions:

Volume of Water to be Removed: Method of Removal:

Water Level After Purging: Pumping Rate:

Well Purge Data:

Sample Withdrawal Method:

Appearance of Sample:

Color:

Turbidity:

Sediment:

Other:

Laboratory Analysis Parameters and Preservatives:

Number and Types of Sample Containers:

Sample Identification Numbers:

Decontamination Procedures:

Notes:

Sampled by:

Sampled Delivered to: Transporters:

Date: Time:

Calscience Environmental Lab FedEx

7/23/2013 1400

Capacity of Casing (Gallons/Linear Feet)

2"-0.16• 4"-0.65 • 8"-2.61 • 10"-4.08 • 12"-5.87

lead - 6020

ES029 [1015], ES029 MS/MSD [1015], ES030 (Dup) [1100]

Triple Rinsed

YSI did not have salinity parameter.

Branden Ibara, Tina Alder

16 - 40ml VOAs, 6 - 1L amber jar, 4 - 500ml amber jar, 4 - 500ml HDPE

Clear

Low

None

Slight PHC Odor

TPH-d - 8015; TPH-g, VOCs - 8260; PAHs - 8270c sim;

Bladder Pump

1012 5.0 L 6.30 0.528 1.49 23.96 - 98.4

- 113.4

1009 4.0 L 6.30 0.529 1.58 23.97 - 100.6

1006 3.0 L 6.37 0.527 1.60 23.98

- 140.6

1003 2.0 L 6.50 0.527 1.58 24.05 - 123.1

957 0.0 L 6.91 0.514 2.13 24.24

86.96 ft 0.33 L/min

Time

Volume 

Removed pH

Conductivity 

(mS/cm) DO (mg/l) Temperature Salinity

Redox (ORP) 

(mV)

94.35 ft Branden Ibara, Tina Alder

- -

5.0 L Bladder Pump

RHMW02 Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 112066

86.96 ft Date: 7/22/2013 950
Groundwater Sampling Log

Well ID: Location: Project No.:

Initial Water Level: Time:

Total Depth of Well: Personnel Involved:

Length of Saturated Zone: Weather Conditions:

Volume of Water to be Removed: Method of Removal:

Water Level After Purging: Pumping Rate:

Well Purge Data:

Sample Withdrawal Method:

Appearance of Sample:

Color:

Turbidity:

Sediment:

Other:

Laboratory Analysis Parameters and Preservatives:

Number and Types of Sample Containers:

Sample Identification Numbers:

Decontamination Procedures:

Notes:

Sampled by:

Sampled Delivered to: Transporters:

Date: Time:

Calscience Environmental Lab FedEx

7/23/2013 1400

Capacity of Casing (Gallons/Linear Feet)

2"-0.16• 4"-0.65 • 8"-2.61 • 10"-4.08 • 12"-5.87

lead - 6020

6 - 40ml VOAs, 2 - 1L amber jar, 1 - 500ml amber jar, 1 - 250ml HDPE

ES031 [1145]

Triple Rinsed

YSI did not have salinity parameter.

Branden Ibara, Tina Alder

Clear

Low

None

None

TPH-d - 8015; TPH-g, VOCs - 8260; PAHs - 8270c sim;

Bladder Pump

- 72.7

1157 6.0 L 6.49 0.657 1.64 26.37 - 71.7

1154 5.0 L 6.50 0.660 1.48 26.29

- 71.1

1151 4.0 L 6.55 0.666 1.49 26.49 - 73.6

1148 3.0 L 6.55 0.670 1.85 26.92

- 75.2

1145 2.0 L 6.69 0.678 2.46 26.97 - 68.2

1130 0.0 L 9.24 0.667 5.27 27.76

103.23 ft 0.22 L/min

Time

Volume 

Removed pH

Conductivity 

(mS/cm) DO (mg/l) Temperature Salinity

Redox (ORP) 

(mV)

110.12 ft Branden Ibara, Tina Alder

- -

6.0 L Bladder Pump

RHMW03 Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 112066

103.23 ft Date: 7/22/2013 1122
Groundwater Sampling Log

Well ID: Location: Project No.:

Initial Water Level: Time:

Total Depth of Well: Personnel Involved:

Length of Saturated Zone: Weather Conditions:

Volume of Water to be Removed: Method of Removal:

Water Level After Purging: Pumping Rate:

Well Purge Data:

Sample Withdrawal Method:

Appearance of Sample:

Color:

Turbidity:

Sediment:

Other:

Laboratory Analysis Parameters and Preservatives:

Number and Types of Sample Containers:

Sample Identification Numbers:

Decontamination Procedures:

Notes:

Sampled by:

Sampled Delivered to: Transporters:

Date: Time:

Calscience Environmental Lab FedEx

7/23/2013 1400

Capacity of Casing (Gallons/Linear Feet)

2"-0.16• 4"-0.65 • 8"-2.61 • 10"-4.08 • 12"-5.87

lead - 6020

6 - 40ml VOAs, 2 - 1L amber jar, 1 - 500ml amber jar, 1 - 250ml HDPE

ES033 [1045]

Triple Rinsed

YSI did not have salinity parameter.

Branden Ibara, Tina Alder

Clear

Clear

None

None

TPH-d - 8015; TPH-g, VOCs - 8260; PAHs - 8270c sim;

Bladder Pump

- 61.6

1039 5.0 L 7.42 0.809 7.15 22.49 - 61.4

1036 4.0 L 7.46 0.808 6.99 22.51

- 64.9

1033 3.0 L 7.66 0.808 6.74 22.59 - 62.1

1030 2.0 L 8.05 0.813 5.98 22.77

- 71.4

1027 1.0 L 8.29 0.826 5.61 22.97 - 67.6

1024 0.0 L 8.83 0.879 5.28 23.14

82.85 ft 0.33 L/min

Time

Volume 

Removed pH

Conductivity 

(mS/cm) DO (mg/l) Temperature Salinity

Redox (ORP) 

(mV)

- Branden Ibara, Tina Alder

- -

- Bladder Pump

RHMW05 Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 112066

83.85 ft Date: 7/23/2013 1016
Groundwater Sampling Log

Well ID: Location: Project No.:

Initial Water Level: Time:

Total Depth of Well: Personnel Involved:

Length of Saturated Zone: Weather Conditions:

Volume of Water to be Removed: Method of Removal:

Water Level After Purging: Pumping Rate:

Well Purge Data:

Sample Withdrawal Method:

Appearance of Sample:

Color:

Turbidity:

Sediment:

Other:

Laboratory Analysis Parameters and Preservatives:

Number and Types of Sample Containers:

Sample Identification Numbers:

Decontamination Procedures:

Notes:

Sampled by:

Sampled Delivered to: Transporters:

Date: Time:

Calscience Environmental Lab FedEx

7/23/2013 1400

Capacity of Casing (Gallons/Linear Feet)

2"-0.16• 4"-0.65 • 8"-2.61 • 10"-4.08 • 12"-5.87

lead - 200.8

6 - 40ml VOAs, 2 - 1L amber jar, 1 - 500ml amber jar, 1 - 250ml HDPE

ES032, ES032 UF [0930]

Triple Rinsed

YSI did not have salinity parameter.

Branden Ibara, Tina Alder

Clear

Clear

None

None

TPH-d - 8015; TPH-g, VOCs - 8260; PAHs - 8270c sim;

Bladder Pump

919 4.0 L 7.30 0.519 5.57 21.88 - 71.2

- 70.7

916 3.0 L 7.32 0.519 5.54 21.98 - 70.3

913 2.0 L 7.33 0.523 5.40 22.16

- 22.7

910 1.0 L 7.48 0.522 5.21 23.09 - 71.8

902 0.0 L 6.39 0.289 2.03 26.23

- 0.24 L/min

Time

Volume 

Removed pH

Conductivity 

(mS/cm) DO (mg/l) Temperature Salinity

Redox (ORP) 

(mV)

- Branden Ibara, Tina Alder

- -

- Bladder Pump

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 112066

82.56 ft Date: 7/23/2013 845

RHMW2254-01
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
APPENDIX B 

Field Notes 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.


APPENDIX C 

Laboratory Reports 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
WORK ORDER NUMBER: 13-07-1671

Analytical Report For

Client: Environmental Science International, Inc.

Client Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066

Attention: Robert Chong

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Approved for release on by:

Richard Villafania

Project Manager

AIR SOIL WATER MARINE CHEMISTRY

Calscience Environmental Laboratories, Inc. (Calscience) certifies that the test results provided in this report meet all NELAC requirements for parameters for which

accreditation is required or available. Any exceptions to NELAC requirements are noted in the case narrative. The original report of subcontracted analyses, if any,

is attached to this report. The results in this report are limited to the sample(s) tested and any reproduction thereof must be made in its entirety. The client or

recipient of this report is specifically prohibited from making material changes to said report and, to the extent that such changes are made, Calscience is not

responsible, legally or otherwise. The client or recipient agrees to indemnify Calscience for any defense to any litigation which may arise.

08/01/2013

Page 1 of 48
Contents

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Client Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066

Work Order Number: 13-07-1671

1 Work Order Narrative. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

2 Client Sample Data. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

2.1 EPA 8015B (M) TPH Diesel (Aqueous). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

2.2 EPA 6020 ICP/MS Metals (Aqueous). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

2.3 EPA 8270C SIM PAHs (Aqueous). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

2.4 GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics (Aqueous). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

3 Quality Control Sample Data. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30

3.1 MS/MSD. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30

3.2 PDS/PDSD. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35

3.3 LCS/LCSD. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36

4 Sample Analysis Summary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41

5 Glossary of Terms and Qualifiers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42

6 Chain of Custody/Sample Receipt Form. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43

Page 2 of 48
Condition Upon Receipt:

Samples were received under Chain of Custody (COC) on 07/25/13. They were assigned to Work Order 13-07-1671.

Unless otherwise noted on the Sample Receiving forms all samples were received in good condition and within the

recommended EPA temperature criteria for the methods noted on the COC. The COC and Sample Receiving Documents are

integral elements of the analytical report and are presented at the back of the report.

Holding Times:

All samples were analyzed within prescribed holding times (HT) and/or in accordance with the Calscience Sample Acceptance

Policy unless otherwise noted in the analytical report and/or comprehensive case narrative, if required.

Any parameter identified in 40CFR Part 136.3 Table II that is designated as "analyze immediately" with a holding time of <= 15

minutes (40CFR-136.3 Table II, footnote 4), is considered a "field" test and the reported results will be qualified as being

received outside of the stated holding time unless received at the laboratory within 15 minutes of the collection time.

Quality Control:

All quality control parameters (QC) were within established control limits except where noted in the QC summary forms or

described further within this report.

Additional Comments:

Solid - Unless otherwise indicated, solid sample data is reported on a wet weight basis, not corrected for % moisture. All QC

results are always reported on a wet weight basis.

Due to analytical instrument issues for the GRO/Volatiles analysis, samples ES 028, ES 029, ES 030, and ES 031 were not

analyzed within the recommended holding time of 7 days for unpreserved samples. The samples were analyzed on the 8th

day after the sample collection date. Calscience is evaluating contingency measures to prevent similar issues going forward

though recommends that an additional set of HCl-preserved sample vials be collected to extend the analytical holding time if

needed.

Subcontractor Information:

Unless otherwise noted below (or on the subcontract form), no samples were subcontracted.

Work Order Narrative

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Work Order: 13-07-1671 Page 1 of1

Return to Contents

Page 3 of 48
Client Sample Number Lab Sample

Number

Date/Time

Collected

Matrix Instrument Date

Prepared

Date/Time

Analyzed

QC Batch ID

ES 028 13-07-1671-2-H 07/22/13

09:20

Aqueous GC 45 07/26/13 07/26/13

23:58

130726B04

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

- TPH as DRO is quantified in the carbon range C10-C28.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

TPH as Diesel 99 15 20 50 1 HD

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

n-Octacosane 91 51-141

ES 029 13-07-1671-3-H 07/22/13

10:15

Aqueous GC 45 07/26/13 07/27/13

00:14

130726B04

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

- TPH as DRO is quantified in the carbon range C10-C28.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

TPH as Diesel 2500 15 20 50 1 HD

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

n-Octacosane 92 51-141

ES 030 13-07-1671-4-H 07/22/13

11:00

Aqueous GC 45 07/26/13 07/27/13

00:33

130726B04

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

- TPH as DRO is quantified in the carbon range C10-C28.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

TPH as Diesel 2600 15 20 50 1 HD

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

n-Octacosane 97 51-141

ES 031 13-07-1671-5-H 07/22/13

11:45

Aqueous GC 45 07/26/13 07/27/13

00:50

130726B04

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

- TPH as DRO is quantified in the carbon range C10-C28.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

TPH as Diesel 48 15 20 50 1 HD,J

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

n-Octacosane 91 51-141

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 07/25/13

Work Order: 13-07-1671

Preparation: EPA 3510C

Method: EPA 8015B (M)

Units: ug/L

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 1 of2

Return to Contents

Page 4 of 48
Client Sample Number Lab Sample

Number

Date/Time

Collected

Matrix Instrument Date

Prepared

Date/Time

Analyzed

QC Batch ID

ES 032 13-07-1671-6-G 07/23/13

09:30

Aqueous GC 45 07/26/13 07/27/13

01:08

130726B04

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

- TPH as DRO is quantified in the carbon range C10-C28.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

TPH as Diesel <20 15 20 50 1 U

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

n-Octacosane 79 51-141

ES 033 13-07-1671-8-H 07/23/13

10:45

Aqueous GC 45 07/26/13 07/27/13

01:25

130726B04

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

- TPH as DRO is quantified in the carbon range C10-C28.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

TPH as Diesel <20 15 20 50 1 U

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

n-Octacosane 82 51-141

Method Blank 099-15-516-52 N/A Aqueous GC 45 07/26/13 07/26/13

22:31

130726B04

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

TPH as Diesel <20 15 20 50 1 U

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

n-Octacosane 83 51-141

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 07/25/13

Work Order: 13-07-1671

Preparation: EPA 3510C

Method: EPA 8015B (M)

Units: ug/L

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 2 of2

Return to Contents

Page 5 of 48
Client Sample Number Lab Sample

Number

Date/Time

Collected

Matrix Instrument Date

Prepared

Date/Time

Analyzed

QC Batch ID

ES 028 13-07-1671-2-G 07/22/13

09:20

Aqueous ICP/MS 03 07/26/13 07/26/13

16:11

130726L03D

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

Lead <0.200 0.0898 0.200 1.00 1 U

ES 029 13-07-1671-3-G 07/22/13

10:15

Aqueous ICP/MS 03 07/26/13 07/26/13

16:08

130726L03D

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

Lead 0.135 0.0898 0.200 1.00 1 J

ES 030 13-07-1671-4-G 07/22/13

11:00

Aqueous ICP/MS 03 07/26/13 07/26/13

16:20

130726L03D

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

Lead <0.200 0.0898 0.200 1.00 1 U

ES 031 13-07-1671-5-G 07/22/13

11:45

Aqueous ICP/MS 03 07/26/13 07/26/13

16:23

130726L03D

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

Lead <0.200 0.0898 0.200 1.00 1 U

ES 033 13-07-1671-8-G 07/23/13

10:45

Aqueous ICP/MS 03 07/26/13 07/26/13

16:29

130726L03D

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

Lead <0.200 0.0898 0.200 1.00 1 U

Method Blank 099-14-497-41 N/A Aqueous ICP/MS 03 07/26/13 07/26/13

15:44

130726L03D

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

Lead <0.200 0.0898 0.200 1.00 1 U

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 07/25/13

Work Order: 13-07-1671

Preparation: EPA 3020A Total

Method: EPA 6020

Units: ug/L

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 1 of1

Return to Contents

Page 6 of 48
Client Sample Number Lab Sample

Number

Date/Time

Collected

Matrix Instrument Date

Prepared

Date/Time

Analyzed

QC Batch ID

ES 028 13-07-1671-2-I 07/22/13

09:20

Aqueous GC/MS AAA 07/26/13 07/29/13

18:15

130726L03

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

Naphthalene 0.048 0.023 0.050 0.20 1 J

2-Methylnaphthalene <0.050 0.026 0.050 0.20 1 U

1-Methylnaphthalene <0.050 0.028 0.050 0.20 1 U

Acenaphthylene <0.050 0.018 0.050 0.20 1 U

Acenaphthene <0.050 0.021 0.050 0.20 1 U

Fluorene <0.050 0.024 0.050 0.20 1 U

Phenanthrene <0.050 0.031 0.050 0.20 1 U

Anthracene <0.050 0.034 0.050 0.20 1 U

Fluoranthene <0.050 0.027 0.050 0.20 1 U

Pyrene <0.050 0.025 0.050 0.20 1 U

Benzo (a) Anthracene <0.050 0.024 0.050 0.20 1 U

Chrysene <0.050 0.019 0.050 0.20 1 U

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene <0.050 0.023 0.050 0.20 1 U

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene <0.050 0.025 0.050 0.20 1 U

Benzo (a) Pyrene <0.050 0.036 0.050 0.20 1 U

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene <0.050 0.022 0.050 0.20 1 U

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene <0.050 0.027 0.050 0.20 1 U

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene <0.050 0.022 0.050 0.20 1 U

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

Nitrobenzene-d5 74 28-139

2-Fluorobiphenyl 68 33-144

p-Terphenyl-d14 81 23-160

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 07/25/13

Work Order: 13-07-1671

Preparation: EPA 3510C

Method: EPA 8270C SIM PAHs

Units: ug/L

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 1 of7

Return to Contents

Page 7 of 48
Client Sample Number Lab Sample

Number

Date/Time

Collected

Matrix Instrument Date

Prepared

Date/Time

Analyzed

QC Batch ID

ES 029 13-07-1671-3-I 07/22/13

10:15

Aqueous GC/MS AAA 07/26/13 07/29/13

18:41

130726L03

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

2-Methylnaphthalene 9.1 0.026 0.050 0.20 0.99

Acenaphthylene <0.050 0.018 0.050 0.20 0.99 U

Acenaphthene 0.52 0.021 0.050 0.20 0.99

Fluorene 0.23 0.024 0.050 0.20 0.99

Phenanthrene <0.050 0.030 0.050 0.20 0.99 U

Anthracene <0.050 0.034 0.050 0.20 0.99 U

Fluoranthene <0.050 0.027 0.050 0.20 0.99 U

Pyrene <0.050 0.025 0.050 0.20 0.99 U

Benzo (a) Anthracene <0.050 0.024 0.050 0.20 0.99 U

Chrysene <0.050 0.019 0.050 0.20 0.99 U

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene <0.050 0.023 0.050 0.20 0.99 U

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene <0.050 0.025 0.050 0.20 0.99 U

Benzo (a) Pyrene <0.050 0.036 0.050 0.20 0.99 U

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene <0.050 0.022 0.050 0.20 0.99 U

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene <0.050 0.027 0.050 0.20 0.99 U

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene <0.050 0.022 0.050 0.20 0.99 U

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

Nitrobenzene-d5 88 28-139

2-Fluorobiphenyl 74 33-144

p-Terphenyl-d14 79 23-160

ES 029 13-07-1671-3-I 07/22/13

10:15

Aqueous GC/MS AAA 07/26/13 07/30/13

16:10

130726L03

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

Naphthalene 73 0.23 0.50 2.0 9.9

1-Methylnaphthalene 21 0.28 0.50 2.0 9.9

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

Nitrobenzene-d5 62 28-139

2-Fluorobiphenyl 80 33-144

p-Terphenyl-d14 83 23-160

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 07/25/13

Work Order: 13-07-1671

Preparation: EPA 3510C

Method: EPA 8270C SIM PAHs

Units: ug/L

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 2 of7

Return to Contents

Page 8 of 48
Client Sample Number Lab Sample

Number

Date/Time

Collected

Matrix Instrument Date

Prepared

Date/Time

Analyzed

QC Batch ID

ES 030 13-07-1671-4-I 07/22/13

11:00

Aqueous GC/MS AAA 07/26/13 07/29/13

19:07

130726L03

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

2-Methylnaphthalene 6.6 0.027 0.050 0.20 1

Acenaphthylene <0.050 0.018 0.050 0.20 1 U

Acenaphthene 0.51 0.021 0.050 0.20 1

Fluorene 0.22 0.025 0.050 0.20 1

Phenanthrene <0.050 0.031 0.050 0.20 1 U

Anthracene <0.050 0.034 0.050 0.20 1 U

Fluoranthene <0.050 0.027 0.050 0.20 1 U

Pyrene <0.050 0.025 0.050 0.20 1 U

Benzo (a) Anthracene <0.050 0.024 0.050 0.20 1 U

Chrysene <0.050 0.019 0.050 0.20 1 U

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene <0.050 0.023 0.050 0.20 1 U

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene <0.050 0.025 0.050 0.20 1 U

Benzo (a) Pyrene <0.050 0.037 0.050 0.20 1 U

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene <0.050 0.022 0.050 0.20 1 U

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene <0.050 0.027 0.050 0.20 1 U

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene <0.050 0.022 0.050 0.20 1 U

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

Nitrobenzene-d5 85 28-139

2-Fluorobiphenyl 73 33-144

p-Terphenyl-d14 77 23-160

ES 030 13-07-1671-4-I 07/22/13

11:00

Aqueous GC/MS AAA 07/26/13 07/30/13

16:36

130726L03

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

Naphthalene 67 0.23 0.50 2.0 10

1-Methylnaphthalene 18 0.28 0.50 2.0 10

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

Nitrobenzene-d5 58 28-139

2-Fluorobiphenyl 78 33-144

p-Terphenyl-d14 80 23-160

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 07/25/13

Work Order: 13-07-1671

Preparation: EPA 3510C

Method: EPA 8270C SIM PAHs

Units: ug/L

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 3 of7

Return to Contents

Page 9 of 48
Client Sample Number Lab Sample

Number

Date/Time

Collected

Matrix Instrument Date

Prepared

Date/Time

Analyzed

QC Batch ID

ES 031 13-07-1671-5-I 07/22/13

11:45

Aqueous GC/MS AAA 07/26/13 07/29/13

19:34

130726L03

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

Naphthalene 0.064 0.023 0.050 0.20 1.01 J

2-Methylnaphthalene <0.050 0.027 0.050 0.20 1.01 U

1-Methylnaphthalene <0.050 0.029 0.050 0.20 1.01 U

Acenaphthylene <0.050 0.018 0.050 0.20 1.01 U

Acenaphthene <0.050 0.021 0.050 0.20 1.01 U

Fluorene <0.050 0.025 0.050 0.20 1.01 U

Phenanthrene <0.050 0.031 0.050 0.20 1.01 U

Anthracene <0.050 0.034 0.050 0.20 1.01 U

Fluoranthene <0.050 0.027 0.050 0.20 1.01 U

Pyrene <0.050 0.025 0.050 0.20 1.01 U

Benzo (a) Anthracene <0.050 0.024 0.050 0.20 1.01 U

Chrysene <0.050 0.019 0.050 0.20 1.01 U

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene <0.050 0.024 0.050 0.20 1.01 U

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene <0.050 0.025 0.050 0.20 1.01 U

Benzo (a) Pyrene <0.050 0.037 0.050 0.20 1.01 U

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene <0.050 0.022 0.050 0.20 1.01 U

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene <0.050 0.027 0.050 0.20 1.01 U

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene <0.050 0.022 0.050 0.20 1.01 U

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

Nitrobenzene-d5 73 28-139

2-Fluorobiphenyl 63 33-144

p-Terphenyl-d14 77 23-160

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 07/25/13

Work Order: 13-07-1671

Preparation: EPA 3510C

Method: EPA 8270C SIM PAHs

Units: ug/L

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 4 of7

Return to Contents

Page 10 of 48
Client Sample Number Lab Sample

Number

Date/Time

Collected

Matrix Instrument Date

Prepared

Date/Time

Analyzed

QC Batch ID

ES 032 13-07-1671-6-I 07/23/13

09:30

Aqueous GC/MS AAA 07/26/13 07/29/13

20:00

130726L03

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

Naphthalene 0.099 0.023 0.050 0.20 0.99 J

2-Methylnaphthalene <0.050 0.026 0.050 0.20 0.99 U

1-Methylnaphthalene <0.050 0.028 0.050 0.20 0.99 U

Acenaphthylene <0.050 0.018 0.050 0.20 0.99 U

Acenaphthene <0.050 0.021 0.050 0.20 0.99 U

Fluorene <0.050 0.024 0.050 0.20 0.99 U

Phenanthrene <0.050 0.030 0.050 0.20 0.99 U

Anthracene <0.050 0.034 0.050 0.20 0.99 U

Fluoranthene <0.050 0.027 0.050 0.20 0.99 U

Pyrene <0.050 0.025 0.050 0.20 0.99 U

Benzo (a) Anthracene <0.050 0.024 0.050 0.20 0.99 U

Chrysene <0.050 0.019 0.050 0.20 0.99 U

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene <0.050 0.023 0.050 0.20 0.99 U

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene <0.050 0.025 0.050 0.20 0.99 U

Benzo (a) Pyrene <0.050 0.036 0.050 0.20 0.99 U

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene <0.050 0.022 0.050 0.20 0.99 U

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene <0.050 0.027 0.050 0.20 0.99 U

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene <0.050 0.022 0.050 0.20 0.99 U

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

Nitrobenzene-d5 75 28-139

2-Fluorobiphenyl 66 33-144

p-Terphenyl-d14 83 23-160

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 07/25/13

Work Order: 13-07-1671

Preparation: EPA 3510C

Method: EPA 8270C SIM PAHs

Units: ug/L

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 5 of7

Return to Contents

Page 11 of 48
Client Sample Number Lab Sample

Number

Date/Time

Collected

Matrix Instrument Date

Prepared

Date/Time

Analyzed

QC Batch ID

ES 033 13-07-1671-8-I 07/23/13

10:45

Aqueous GC/MS AAA 07/26/13 07/29/13

20:26

130726L03

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

Naphthalene 0.033 0.023 0.051 0.20 1.01 J

2-Methylnaphthalene <0.051 0.027 0.051 0.20 1.01 U

1-Methylnaphthalene <0.051 0.029 0.051 0.20 1.01 U

Acenaphthylene <0.051 0.018 0.051 0.20 1.01 U

Acenaphthene <0.051 0.021 0.051 0.20 1.01 U

Fluorene <0.051 0.025 0.051 0.20 1.01 U

Phenanthrene <0.051 0.031 0.051 0.20 1.01 U

Anthracene <0.051 0.035 0.051 0.20 1.01 U

Fluoranthene <0.051 0.028 0.051 0.20 1.01 U

Pyrene <0.051 0.025 0.051 0.20 1.01 U

Benzo (a) Anthracene <0.051 0.024 0.051 0.20 1.01 U

Chrysene <0.051 0.019 0.051 0.20 1.01 U

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene <0.051 0.024 0.051 0.20 1.01 U

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene <0.051 0.025 0.051 0.20 1.01 U

Benzo (a) Pyrene <0.051 0.037 0.051 0.20 1.01 U

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene <0.051 0.022 0.051 0.20 1.01 U

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene <0.051 0.027 0.051 0.20 1.01 U

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene <0.051 0.022 0.051 0.20 1.01 U

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

Nitrobenzene-d5 71 28-139

2-Fluorobiphenyl 63 33-144

p-Terphenyl-d14 73 23-160

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 07/25/13

Work Order: 13-07-1671

Preparation: EPA 3510C

Method: EPA 8270C SIM PAHs

Units: ug/L

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 6 of7

Return to Contents

Page 12 of 48
Client Sample Number Lab Sample

Number

Date/Time

Collected

Matrix Instrument Date

Prepared

Date/Time

Analyzed

QC Batch ID

Method Blank 099-15-148-16 N/A Aqueous GC/MS AAA 07/26/13 07/29/13

11:33

130726L03

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

Naphthalene <0.050 0.023 0.050 0.20 1 U

2-Methylnaphthalene <0.050 0.026 0.050 0.20 1 U

1-Methylnaphthalene <0.050 0.028 0.050 0.20 1 U

Acenaphthylene <0.050 0.018 0.050 0.20 1 U

Acenaphthene <0.050 0.021 0.050 0.20 1 U

Fluorene <0.050 0.024 0.050 0.20 1 U

Phenanthrene <0.050 0.031 0.050 0.20 1 U

Anthracene <0.050 0.034 0.050 0.20 1 U

Fluoranthene <0.050 0.027 0.050 0.20 1 U

Pyrene <0.050 0.025 0.050 0.20 1 U

Benzo (a) Anthracene <0.050 0.024 0.050 0.20 1 U

Chrysene <0.050 0.019 0.050 0.20 1 U

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene <0.050 0.023 0.050 0.20 1 U

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene <0.050 0.025 0.050 0.20 1 U

Benzo (a) Pyrene <0.050 0.036 0.050 0.20 1 U

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene <0.050 0.022 0.050 0.20 1 U

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene <0.050 0.027 0.050 0.20 1 U

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene <0.050 0.022 0.050 0.20 1 U

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

Nitrobenzene-d5 74 28-139

2-Fluorobiphenyl 75 33-144

p-Terphenyl-d14 82 23-160

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 07/25/13

Work Order: 13-07-1671

Preparation: EPA 3510C

Method: EPA 8270C SIM PAHs

Units: ug/L

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 7 of7

Return to Contents

Page 13 of 48
Client Sample Number Lab Sample

Number

Date/Time

Collected

Matrix Instrument Date

Prepared

Date/Time

Analyzed

QC Batch ID

ES Trip 13-07-1671-1-A 07/22/13

08:30

Aqueous GC/MS LL 07/30/13 07/30/13

20:47

130730L02

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

Acetone <10 6.0 10 20 1 U

Benzene <0.50 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 U

Bromodichloromethane <0.50 0.21 0.50 5.0 1 U

Bromoform <1.0 0.50 1.0 10 1 U

Bromomethane <5.0 3.9 5.0 20 1 U

2-Butanone <5.0 2.2 5.0 10 1 U

Carbon Tetrachloride <0.50 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 U

Chlorobenzene <0.50 0.17 0.50 5.0 1 U

Chloroethane <5.0 2.3 5.0 10 1 U

Chloroform <0.50 0.46 0.50 5.0 1 U

Chloromethane <2.0 1.8 2.0 10 1 U

Dibromochloromethane <0.50 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <2.0 1.2 2.0 10 1 U

1,2-Dibromoethane <0.50 0.36 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 0.46 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1-Dichloroethane <0.50 0.28 0.50 5.0 1 U

1,2-Dichloroethane <0.50 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1-Dichloroethene <0.50 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 U

c-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 0.48 0.50 1.0 1 U

t-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2-Dichloropropane <0.50 0.42 0.50 5.0 1 U

c-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 U

t-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 U

Ethylbenzene <0.50 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 U

Methylene Chloride <1.0 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 U

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone <5.0 4.4 5.0 10 1 U

Styrene <0.50 0.17 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 0.41 0.50 1.0 1 U

Tetrachloroethene <0.50 0.39 0.50 5.0 1 U

Toluene <0.50 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <1.0 0.50 1.0 5.0 1 U

1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.50 0.30 0.50 5.0 1 U

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene <0.50 0.32 0.50 1.0 1 U

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 07/25/13

Work Order: 13-07-1671

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

Units: ug/L

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 1 of16

Return to Contents

Page 14 of 48
Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.50 0.38 0.50 1.0 1 U

Trichloroethene <0.50 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.0 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 U

Vinyl Chloride <0.50 0.30 0.50 1.0 1 U

p/m-Xylene <1.0 0.30 1.0 10 1 U

o-Xylene <0.50 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 U

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) <0.50 0.31 0.50 1.0 1 U

Gasoline Range Organics 21 13 30 50 1 J

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

Dibromofluoromethane 93 80-126

1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 88 80-134

Toluene-d8 99 80-120

Toluene-d8-TPPH 95 88-112

1,4-Bromofluorobenzene 92 80-120

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 07/25/13

Work Order: 13-07-1671

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

Units: ug/L

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 2 of16

Return to Contents

Page 15 of 48
Client Sample Number Lab Sample

Number

Date/Time

Collected

Matrix Instrument Date

Prepared

Date/Time

Analyzed

QC Batch ID

ES 028 13-07-1671-2-A 07/22/13

09:20

Aqueous GC/MS LL 07/30/13 07/30/13

21:15

130730L02

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

- Sample extracted outside recommended holding time.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

Acetone <10 6.0 10 20 1 U

Benzene <0.50 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 U

Bromodichloromethane <0.50 0.21 0.50 5.0 1 U

Bromoform <1.0 0.50 1.0 10 1 U

Bromomethane <5.0 3.9 5.0 20 1 U

2-Butanone <5.0 2.2 5.0 10 1 U

Carbon Tetrachloride <0.50 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 U

Chlorobenzene <0.50 0.17 0.50 5.0 1 U

Chloroethane <5.0 2.3 5.0 10 1 U

Chloroform <0.50 0.46 0.50 5.0 1 U

Chloromethane <2.0 1.8 2.0 10 1 U

Dibromochloromethane <0.50 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <2.0 1.2 2.0 10 1 U

1,2-Dibromoethane <0.50 0.36 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 0.46 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1-Dichloroethane <0.50 0.28 0.50 5.0 1 U

1,2-Dichloroethane <0.50 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1-Dichloroethene <0.50 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 U

c-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 0.48 0.50 1.0 1 U

t-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2-Dichloropropane <0.50 0.42 0.50 5.0 1 U

c-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 U

t-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 U

Ethylbenzene <0.50 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 U

Methylene Chloride <1.0 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 U

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone <5.0 4.4 5.0 10 1 U

Styrene <0.50 0.17 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 0.41 0.50 1.0 1 U

Tetrachloroethene <0.50 0.39 0.50 5.0 1 U

Toluene <0.50 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <1.0 0.50 1.0 5.0 1 U

1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.50 0.30 0.50 5.0 1 U

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 07/25/13

Work Order: 13-07-1671

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

Units: ug/L

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 3 of16

Return to Contents

Page 16 of 48
Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene <0.50 0.32 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.50 0.38 0.50 1.0 1 U

Trichloroethene <0.50 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.0 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 U

Vinyl Chloride <0.50 0.30 0.50 1.0 1 U

p/m-Xylene <1.0 0.30 1.0 10 1 U

o-Xylene <0.50 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 U

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) <0.50 0.31 0.50 1.0 1 U

Gasoline Range Organics <30 13 30 50 1 U

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

Dibromofluoromethane 92 80-126

1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 89 80-134

Toluene-d8 100 80-120

Toluene-d8-TPPH 96 88-112

1,4-Bromofluorobenzene 91 80-120

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 07/25/13

Work Order: 13-07-1671

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

Units: ug/L

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 4 of16

Return to Contents

Page 17 of 48
Client Sample Number Lab Sample

Number

Date/Time

Collected

Matrix Instrument Date

Prepared

Date/Time

Analyzed

QC Batch ID

ES 029 13-07-1671-3-A 07/22/13

10:15

Aqueous GC/MS LL 07/30/13 07/30/13

21:43

130730L02

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

- Sample extracted outside recommended holding time.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

Acetone <10 6.0 10 20 1 U

Benzene <0.50 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 U

Bromodichloromethane <0.50 0.21 0.50 5.0 1 U

Bromoform <1.0 0.50 1.0 10 1 U

Bromomethane <5.0 3.9 5.0 20 1 U

2-Butanone <5.0 2.2 5.0 10 1 U

Carbon Tetrachloride <0.50 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 U

Chlorobenzene <0.50 0.17 0.50 5.0 1 U

Chloroethane <5.0 2.3 5.0 10 1 U

Chloroform <0.50 0.46 0.50 5.0 1 U

Chloromethane <2.0 1.8 2.0 10 1 U

Dibromochloromethane <0.50 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <2.0 1.2 2.0 10 1 U

1,2-Dibromoethane <0.50 0.36 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 0.46 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1-Dichloroethane <0.50 0.28 0.50 5.0 1 U

1,2-Dichloroethane <0.50 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1-Dichloroethene <0.50 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 U

c-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 0.48 0.50 1.0 1 U

t-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2-Dichloropropane <0.50 0.42 0.50 5.0 1 U

c-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 U

t-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 U

Ethylbenzene 0.17 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 J

Methylene Chloride <1.0 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 U

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone <5.0 4.4 5.0 10 1 U

Styrene <0.50 0.17 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 0.41 0.50 1.0 1 U

Tetrachloroethene <0.50 0.39 0.50 5.0 1 U

Toluene <0.50 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <1.0 0.50 1.0 5.0 1 U

1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.50 0.30 0.50 5.0 1 U

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 07/25/13

Work Order: 13-07-1671

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

Units: ug/L

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 5 of16

Return to Contents

Page 18 of 48
Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene <0.50 0.32 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.50 0.38 0.50 1.0 1 U

Trichloroethene <0.50 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.0 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 U

Vinyl Chloride <0.50 0.30 0.50 1.0 1 U

p/m-Xylene <1.0 0.30 1.0 10 1 U

o-Xylene 0.45 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 J

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) <0.50 0.31 0.50 1.0 1 U

Gasoline Range Organics 55 13 30 50 1

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

Dibromofluoromethane 97 80-126

1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 92 80-134

Toluene-d8 98 80-120

Toluene-d8-TPPH 94 88-112

1,4-Bromofluorobenzene 95 80-120

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 07/25/13

Work Order: 13-07-1671

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

Units: ug/L

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 6 of16

Return to Contents

Page 19 of 48
Client Sample Number Lab Sample

Number

Date/Time

Collected

Matrix Instrument Date

Prepared

Date/Time

Analyzed

QC Batch ID

ES 030 13-07-1671-4-A 07/22/13

11:00

Aqueous GC/MS LL 07/30/13 07/30/13

22:11

130730L02

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

- Sample extracted outside recommended holding time.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

Acetone <10 6.0 10 20 1 U

Benzene <0.50 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 U

Bromodichloromethane <0.50 0.21 0.50 5.0 1 U

Bromoform <1.0 0.50 1.0 10 1 U

Bromomethane <5.0 3.9 5.0 20 1 U

2-Butanone <5.0 2.2 5.0 10 1 U

Carbon Tetrachloride <0.50 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 U

Chlorobenzene <0.50 0.17 0.50 5.0 1 U

Chloroethane <5.0 2.3 5.0 10 1 U

Chloroform <0.50 0.46 0.50 5.0 1 U

Chloromethane <2.0 1.8 2.0 10 1 U

Dibromochloromethane <0.50 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <2.0 1.2 2.0 10 1 U

1,2-Dibromoethane <0.50 0.36 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 0.46 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1-Dichloroethane <0.50 0.28 0.50 5.0 1 U

1,2-Dichloroethane <0.50 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1-Dichloroethene <0.50 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 U

c-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 0.48 0.50 1.0 1 U

t-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2-Dichloropropane <0.50 0.42 0.50 5.0 1 U

c-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 U

t-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 U

Ethylbenzene 0.19 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 J

Methylene Chloride <1.0 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 U

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone <5.0 4.4 5.0 10 1 U

Styrene <0.50 0.17 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 0.41 0.50 1.0 1 U

Tetrachloroethene <0.50 0.39 0.50 5.0 1 U

Toluene <0.50 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <1.0 0.50 1.0 5.0 1 U

1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.50 0.30 0.50 5.0 1 U

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 07/25/13

Work Order: 13-07-1671

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

Units: ug/L

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 7 of16

Return to Contents

Page 20 of 48
Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene <0.50 0.32 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.50 0.38 0.50 1.0 1 U

Trichloroethene <0.50 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.0 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 U

Vinyl Chloride <0.50 0.30 0.50 1.0 1 U

p/m-Xylene <1.0 0.30 1.0 10 1 U

o-Xylene 0.50 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 J

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) <0.50 0.31 0.50 1.0 1 U

Gasoline Range Organics 61 13 30 50 1

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

Dibromofluoromethane 93 80-126

1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 92 80-134

Toluene-d8 98 80-120

Toluene-d8-TPPH 94 88-112

1,4-Bromofluorobenzene 94 80-120

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 07/25/13

Work Order: 13-07-1671

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

Units: ug/L

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 8 of16

Return to Contents

Page 21 of 48
Client Sample Number Lab Sample

Number

Date/Time

Collected

Matrix Instrument Date

Prepared

Date/Time

Analyzed

QC Batch ID

ES 031 13-07-1671-5-A 07/22/13

11:45

Aqueous GC/MS LL 07/30/13 07/30/13

22:38

130730L02

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

- Sample extracted outside recommended holding time.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

Acetone <10 6.0 10 20 1 U

Benzene <0.50 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 U

Bromodichloromethane <0.50 0.21 0.50 5.0 1 U

Bromoform <1.0 0.50 1.0 10 1 U

Bromomethane <5.0 3.9 5.0 20 1 U

2-Butanone <5.0 2.2 5.0 10 1 U

Carbon Tetrachloride <0.50 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 U

Chlorobenzene <0.50 0.17 0.50 5.0 1 U

Chloroethane <5.0 2.3 5.0 10 1 U

Chloroform <0.50 0.46 0.50 5.0 1 U

Chloromethane <2.0 1.8 2.0 10 1 U

Dibromochloromethane <0.50 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <2.0 1.2 2.0 10 1 U

1,2-Dibromoethane <0.50 0.36 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 0.46 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1-Dichloroethane <0.50 0.28 0.50 5.0 1 U

1,2-Dichloroethane <0.50 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1-Dichloroethene <0.50 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 U

c-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 0.48 0.50 1.0 1 U

t-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2-Dichloropropane <0.50 0.42 0.50 5.0 1 U

c-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 U

t-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 U

Ethylbenzene <0.50 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 U

Methylene Chloride <1.0 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 U

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone <5.0 4.4 5.0 10 1 U

Styrene <0.50 0.17 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 0.41 0.50 1.0 1 U

Tetrachloroethene <0.50 0.39 0.50 5.0 1 U

Toluene <0.50 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <1.0 0.50 1.0 5.0 1 U

1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.50 0.30 0.50 5.0 1 U

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 07/25/13

Work Order: 13-07-1671

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

Units: ug/L

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 9 of16

Return to Contents

Page 22 of 48
Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene <0.50 0.32 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.50 0.38 0.50 1.0 1 U

Trichloroethene <0.50 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.0 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 U

Vinyl Chloride <0.50 0.30 0.50 1.0 1 U

p/m-Xylene <1.0 0.30 1.0 10 1 U

o-Xylene <0.50 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 U

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) <0.50 0.31 0.50 1.0 1 U

Gasoline Range Organics <30 13 30 50 1 U

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

Dibromofluoromethane 89 80-126

1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 89 80-134

Toluene-d8 98 80-120

Toluene-d8-TPPH 95 88-112

1,4-Bromofluorobenzene 89 80-120

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 07/25/13

Work Order: 13-07-1671

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

Units: ug/L

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 10 of16

Return to Contents

Page 23 of 48
Client Sample Number Lab Sample

Number

Date/Time

Collected

Matrix Instrument Date

Prepared

Date/Time

Analyzed

QC Batch ID

ES 032 13-07-1671-6-A 07/23/13

09:30

Aqueous GC/MS LL 07/30/13 07/30/13

23:06

130730L02

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

Acetone <10 6.0 10 20 1 U

Benzene <0.50 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 U

Bromodichloromethane <0.50 0.21 0.50 5.0 1 U

Bromoform <1.0 0.50 1.0 10 1 U

Bromomethane <5.0 3.9 5.0 20 1 U

2-Butanone <5.0 2.2 5.0 10 1 U

Carbon Tetrachloride <0.50 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 U

Chlorobenzene <0.50 0.17 0.50 5.0 1 U

Chloroethane <5.0 2.3 5.0 10 1 U

Chloroform <0.50 0.46 0.50 5.0 1 U

Chloromethane <2.0 1.8 2.0 10 1 U

Dibromochloromethane <0.50 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <2.0 1.2 2.0 10 1 U

1,2-Dibromoethane <0.50 0.36 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 0.46 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1-Dichloroethane <0.50 0.28 0.50 5.0 1 U

1,2-Dichloroethane <0.50 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1-Dichloroethene <0.50 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 U

c-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 0.48 0.50 1.0 1 U

t-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2-Dichloropropane <0.50 0.42 0.50 5.0 1 U

c-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 U

t-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 U

Ethylbenzene <0.50 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 U

Methylene Chloride <1.0 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 U

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone <5.0 4.4 5.0 10 1 U

Styrene <0.50 0.17 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 0.41 0.50 1.0 1 U

Tetrachloroethene <0.50 0.39 0.50 5.0 1 U

Toluene <0.50 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <1.0 0.50 1.0 5.0 1 U

1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.50 0.30 0.50 5.0 1 U

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 07/25/13

Work Order: 13-07-1671

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

Units: ug/L

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 11 of16

Return to Contents

Page 24 of 48
Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene <0.50 0.32 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.50 0.38 0.50 1.0 1 U

Trichloroethene <0.50 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.0 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 U

Vinyl Chloride <0.50 0.30 0.50 1.0 1 U

p/m-Xylene <1.0 0.30 1.0 10 1 U

o-Xylene <0.50 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 U

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) <0.50 0.31 0.50 1.0 1 U

Gasoline Range Organics <30 13 30 50 1 U

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

Dibromofluoromethane 90 80-126

1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 91 80-134

Toluene-d8 99 80-120

Toluene-d8-TPPH 95 88-112

1,4-Bromofluorobenzene 91 80-120

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 07/25/13

Work Order: 13-07-1671

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

Units: ug/L

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 12 of16

Return to Contents

Page 25 of 48
Client Sample Number Lab Sample

Number

Date/Time

Collected

Matrix Instrument Date

Prepared

Date/Time

Analyzed

QC Batch ID

ES 033 13-07-1671-8-A 07/23/13

10:45

Aqueous GC/MS LL 07/30/13 07/30/13

23:33

130730L02

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

Acetone <10 6.0 10 20 1 U

Benzene <0.50 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 U

Bromodichloromethane <0.50 0.21 0.50 5.0 1 U

Bromoform <1.0 0.50 1.0 10 1 U

Bromomethane <5.0 3.9 5.0 20 1 U

2-Butanone <5.0 2.2 5.0 10 1 U

Carbon Tetrachloride <0.50 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 U

Chlorobenzene <0.50 0.17 0.50 5.0 1 U

Chloroethane <5.0 2.3 5.0 10 1 U

Chloroform <0.50 0.46 0.50 5.0 1 U

Chloromethane <2.0 1.8 2.0 10 1 U

Dibromochloromethane <0.50 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <2.0 1.2 2.0 10 1 U

1,2-Dibromoethane <0.50 0.36 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 0.46 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1-Dichloroethane <0.50 0.28 0.50 5.0 1 U

1,2-Dichloroethane <0.50 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1-Dichloroethene <0.50 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 U

c-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 0.48 0.50 1.0 1 U

t-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2-Dichloropropane <0.50 0.42 0.50 5.0 1 U

c-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 U

t-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 U

Ethylbenzene <0.50 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 U

Methylene Chloride <1.0 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 U

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone <5.0 4.4 5.0 10 1 U

Styrene <0.50 0.17 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 0.41 0.50 1.0 1 U

Tetrachloroethene <0.50 0.39 0.50 5.0 1 U

Toluene <0.50 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <1.0 0.50 1.0 5.0 1 U

1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.50 0.30 0.50 5.0 1 U

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 07/25/13

Work Order: 13-07-1671

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

Units: ug/L

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 13 of16

Return to Contents

Page 26 of 48
Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene <0.50 0.32 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.50 0.38 0.50 1.0 1 U

Trichloroethene <0.50 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.0 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 U

Vinyl Chloride <0.50 0.30 0.50 1.0 1 U

p/m-Xylene <1.0 0.30 1.0 10 1 U

o-Xylene <0.50 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 U

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) <0.50 0.31 0.50 1.0 1 U

Gasoline Range Organics <30 13 30 50 1 U

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

Dibromofluoromethane 93 80-126

1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 93 80-134

Toluene-d8 97 80-120

Toluene-d8-TPPH 93 88-112

1,4-Bromofluorobenzene 91 80-120

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 07/25/13

Work Order: 13-07-1671

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

Units: ug/L

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 14 of16

Return to Contents

Page 27 of 48
Client Sample Number Lab Sample

Number

Date/Time

Collected

Matrix Instrument Date

Prepared

Date/Time

Analyzed

QC Batch ID

Method Blank 099-13-057-26 N/A Aqueous GC/MS LL 07/30/13 07/30/13

20:20

130730L02

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

Acetone <10 6.0 10 20 1 U

Benzene <0.50 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 U

Bromodichloromethane <0.50 0.21 0.50 5.0 1 U

Bromoform <1.0 0.50 1.0 10 1 U

Bromomethane <5.0 3.9 5.0 20 1 U

2-Butanone <5.0 2.2 5.0 10 1 U

Carbon Tetrachloride <0.50 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 U

Chlorobenzene <0.50 0.17 0.50 5.0 1 U

Chloroethane <5.0 2.3 5.0 10 1 U

Chloroform <0.50 0.46 0.50 5.0 1 U

Chloromethane <2.0 1.8 2.0 10 1 U

Dibromochloromethane <0.50 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <2.0 1.2 2.0 10 1 U

1,2-Dibromoethane <0.50 0.36 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 0.46 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1-Dichloroethane <0.50 0.28 0.50 5.0 1 U

1,2-Dichloroethane <0.50 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1-Dichloroethene <0.50 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 U

c-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 0.48 0.50 1.0 1 U

t-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2-Dichloropropane <0.50 0.42 0.50 5.0 1 U

c-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 U

t-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 U

Ethylbenzene <0.50 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 U

Methylene Chloride <1.0 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 U

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone <5.0 4.4 5.0 10 1 U

Styrene <0.50 0.17 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 0.41 0.50 1.0 1 U

Tetrachloroethene <0.50 0.39 0.50 5.0 1 U

Toluene <0.50 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <1.0 0.50 1.0 5.0 1 U

1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.50 0.30 0.50 5.0 1 U

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene <0.50 0.32 0.50 1.0 1 U

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 07/25/13

Work Order: 13-07-1671

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

Units: ug/L

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 15 of16

Return to Contents

Page 28 of 48
Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.50 0.38 0.50 1.0 1 U

Trichloroethene <0.50 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.0 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 U

Vinyl Chloride <0.50 0.30 0.50 1.0 1 U

p/m-Xylene <1.0 0.30 1.0 10 1 U

o-Xylene <0.50 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 U

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) <0.50 0.31 0.50 1.0 1 U

Gasoline Range Organics <30 13 30 50 1 U

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

Dibromofluoromethane 91 80-126

1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 88 80-134

Toluene-d8 99 80-120

Toluene-d8-TPPH 95 88-112

1,4-Bromofluorobenzene 92 80-120

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 07/25/13

Work Order: 13-07-1671

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

Units: ug/L

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 16 of16

Return to Contents

Page 29 of 48
Quality Control Sample ID Matrix Instrument Date Prepared Date Analyzed MS/MSD Batch Number

ES 029 Aqueous GC 45 07/26/13 07/26/13 23:23 130726S04

Parameter Sample

Conc.

Spike

Added

MS

Conc.

MS

%Rec.

MSD

Conc.

MSD

%Rec.

%Rec. CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers

TPH as Diesel 2535 4000 6971 111 7134 115 55-133 2 0-30

Quality Control - Spike/Spike Duplicate

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 07/25/13

Work Order: 13-07-1671

Preparation: EPA 3510C

Method: EPA 8015B (M)

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 1 of5

 RPD: Relative Percent Difference. CL: Control Limits

Return to Contents

Page 30 of 48
Quality Control Sample ID Matrix Instrument Date Prepared Date Analyzed MS/MSD Batch Number

ES 029 Aqueous ICP/MS 03 07/26/13 07/26/13 15:53 130726S03

Parameter Sample

Conc.

Spike

Added

MS

Conc.

MS

%Rec.

MSD

Conc.

MSD

%Rec.

%Rec. CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers

Lead ND 100.0 107.2 107 107.4 107 80-120 0 0-20

Quality Control - Spike/Spike Duplicate

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 07/25/13

Work Order: 13-07-1671

Preparation: EPA 3020A Total

Method: EPA 6020

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 2 of5

 RPD: Relative Percent Difference. CL: Control Limits

Return to Contents

Page 31 of 48
Quality Control Sample ID Matrix Instrument Date Prepared Date Analyzed MS/MSD Batch Number

ES 029 Aqueous GC/MS AAA 07/26/13 07/29/13 20:52 130726S03

Parameter Sample

Conc.

Spike

Added

MS

Conc.

MS

%Rec.

MSD

Conc.

MSD

%Rec.

%Rec. CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers

Naphthalene 72.61 2.000 49.72 0 54.10 0 21-133 8 0-25 3

2-Methylnaphthalene 9.123 2.000 6.340 0 8.854 0 21-140 33 0-25 3,4

1-Methylnaphthalene 20.68 2.000 16.50 0 19.27 0 20-140 16 0-25 3

Acenaphthylene ND 2.000 1.429 71 1.477 74 33-145 3 0-25

Acenaphthene 0.5233 2.000 1.783 63 1.858 67 49-121 4 0-25

Fluorene 0.2334 2.000 1.635 70 1.667 72 59-121 2 0-25

Phenanthrene ND 2.000 1.303 65 1.307 65 54-120 0 0-25

Anthracene ND 2.000 1.145 57 1.143 57 27-133 0 0-25

Fluoranthene ND 2.000 1.453 73 1.436 72 26-137 1 0-25

Pyrene ND 2.000 1.354 68 1.361 68 18-168 0 0-25

Benzo (a) Anthracene ND 2.000 1.423 71 1.410 70 33-143 1 0-25

Chrysene ND 2.000 1.315 66 1.315 66 17-168 0 0-25

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene ND 2.000 1.460 73 1.442 72 24-159 1 0-25

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene ND 2.000 1.512 76 1.496 75 24-159 1 0-25

Benzo (a) Pyrene ND 2.000 1.562 78 1.540 77 17-163 1 0-25

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene ND 2.000 1.441 72 1.418 71 10-171 2 0-25

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene ND 2.000 1.247 62 1.226 61 10-219 2 0-25

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene ND 2.000 1.149 57 1.136 57 10-227 1 0-25

Quality Control - Spike/Spike Duplicate

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 07/25/13

Work Order: 13-07-1671

Preparation: EPA 3510C

Method: EPA 8270C SIM PAHs

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 3 of5

 RPD: Relative Percent Difference. CL: Control Limits

Return to Contents

Page 32 of 48
Quality Control Sample ID Matrix Instrument Date Prepared Date Analyzed MS/MSD Batch Number

ES 029 Aqueous GC/MS LL 07/30/13 07/31/13 00:01 130730S01

Parameter Sample

Conc.

Spike

Added

MS

Conc.

MS

%Rec.

MSD

Conc.

MSD

%Rec.

%Rec. CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers

Acetone ND 50.00 56.35 113 53.65 107 40-140 5 0-20

Benzene ND 50.00 43.99 88 42.32 85 80-120 4 0-20

Bromodichloromethane ND 50.00 41.56 83 39.91 80 75-120 4 0-20

Bromoform ND 50.00 45.53 91 46.60 93 70-130 2 0-20

Bromomethane ND 50.00 43.11 86 45.93 92 30-145 6 0-20

2-Butanone ND 50.00 44.17 88 43.75 87 30-150 1 0-20

Carbon Tetrachloride ND 50.00 41.55 83 39.40 79 65-140 5 0-20

Chlorobenzene ND 50.00 41.39 83 40.04 80 80-120 3 0-20

Chloroethane ND 50.00 43.09 86 40.13 80 60-135 7 0-20

Chloroform ND 50.00 41.61 83 39.28 79 65-135 6 0-20

Chloromethane ND 50.00 41.74 83 41.92 84 40-125 0 0-20

Dibromochloromethane ND 50.00 44.69 89 43.90 88 60-135 2 0-20

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane ND 50.00 42.44 85 42.37 85 50-130 0 0-20

1,2-Dibromoethane ND 50.00 43.55 87 42.66 85 80-120 2 0-20

1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 50.00 41.09 82 40.48 81 70-120 2 0-20

1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 50.00 40.24 80 39.76 80 75-125 1 0-20

1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 50.00 42.49 85 41.50 83 75-125 2 0-20

1,1-Dichloroethane ND 50.00 40.08 80 39.00 78 70-135 3 0-20

1,2-Dichloroethane ND 50.00 43.15 86 40.49 81 70-130 6 0-20

1,1-Dichloroethene ND 50.00 40.26 81 38.57 77 70-130 4 0-20

c-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 50.00 41.65 83 41.94 84 70-125 1 0-20

t-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 50.00 42.20 84 41.02 82 60-140 3 0-20

1,2-Dichloropropane ND 50.00 43.38 87 42.24 84 75-125 3 0-20

c-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 50.00 47.25 95 45.13 90 70-130 5 0-20

t-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 50.00 36.39 73 35.86 72 55-140 1 0-20

Ethylbenzene ND 50.00 43.76 88 42.27 85 75-125 3 0-20

Methylene Chloride ND 50.00 43.54 87 41.43 83 55-140 5 0-20

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone ND 50.00 41.16 82 40.02 80 60-135 3 0-20

Styrene ND 50.00 44.64 89 42.93 86 65-135 4 0-20

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 50.00 45.22 90 43.52 87 80-130 4 0-20

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 50.00 42.00 84 42.52 85 65-130 1 0-20

Tetrachloroethene ND 50.00 47.51 95 45.16 90 45-150 5 0-20

Toluene ND 50.00 43.07 86 40.88 82 75-120 5 0-20

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 50.00 44.11 88 43.90 88 65-135 0 0-20

1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 50.00 40.83 82 38.50 77 65-130 6 0-20

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene ND 50.00 41.67 83 41.24 82 50-140 1 0-20

1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 50.00 45.10 90 42.48 85 75-125 6 0-20

Quality Control - Spike/Spike Duplicate

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 07/25/13

Work Order: 13-07-1671

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 4 of5

 RPD: Relative Percent Difference. CL: Control Limits

Return to Contents

Page 33 of 48
Parameter Sample

Conc.

Spike

Added

MS

Conc.

MS

%Rec.

MSD

Conc.

MSD

%Rec.

%Rec. CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers

Trichloroethene ND 50.00 42.89 86 41.05 82 70-125 4 0-20

1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 50.00 44.34 89 41.24 82 75-125 7 0-20

Vinyl Chloride ND 50.00 40.78 82 39.52 79 50-145 3 0-20

p/m-Xylene ND 100.0 85.40 85 81.08 81 75-130 5 0-20

o-Xylene ND 50.00 42.06 84 39.60 79 80-120 6 0-20 3

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) ND 50.00 37.84 76 37.64 75 65-125 1 0-20

Quality Control - Spike/Spike Duplicate

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 07/25/13

Work Order: 13-07-1671

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 5 of5

 RPD: Relative Percent Difference. CL: Control Limits

Return to Contents

Page 34 of 48
Quality Control Sample ID Matrix Instrument Date Prepared Date Analyzed PDS/PDSD Batch Number

ES 029 Aqueous ICP/MS 03 07/26/13 00:00 07/26/13 15:59 130726S03

Parameter Sample Conc. Spike Added PDS Conc. PDS %Rec. %Rec. CL Qualifiers

Lead ND 100.0 100.8 101 75-125

Quality Control - PDS/PDSD

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 07/25/13

Work Order: 13-07-1671

Preparation: EPA 3020A Total

Method: EPA 6020

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 1 of1

 RPD: Relative Percent Difference. CL: Control Limits

Return to Contents

Page 35 of 48
Quality Control Sample ID Matrix Instrument Date Prepared Date Analyzed LCS/LCSD Batch Number

099-15-516-52 Aqueous GC 45 07/26/13 07/26/13 22:47 130726B04

Parameter Spike

Added

LCS

Conc.

LCS

%Rec.

LCSD

Conc.

LCSD

%Rec.

%Rec. CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers

TPH as Diesel 4000 4620 116 4498 112 60-132 3 0-11

Quality Control - LCS/LCSD

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 07/25/13

Work Order: 13-07-1671

Preparation: EPA 3510C

Method: EPA 8015B (M)

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 1 of5

 RPD: Relative Percent Difference. CL: Control Limits

Return to Contents

Page 36 of 48
Quality Control Sample ID Matrix Instrument Date Analyzed LCS Batch Number

099-14-497-41 Aqueous ICP/MS 03 07/26/13 15:50 130726L03D

Parameter Spike Added Conc. Recovered LCS %Rec. %Rec. CL Qualifiers

Lead 100.0 96.90 97 80-120

Quality Control - LCS

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 07/25/13

Work Order: 13-07-1671

Preparation: EPA 3020A Total

Method: EPA 6020

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 2 of5

 RPD: Relative Percent Difference. CL: Control Limits

Return to Contents

Page 37 of 48
Total number of LCS compounds: 18

Total number of ME compounds: 0

Total number of ME compounds allowed: 1

LCS ME CL validation result: Pass

Quality Control Sample ID Matrix Instrument Date Analyzed LCS Batch Number

099-15-148-16 Aqueous GC/MS AAA 07/29/13 11:59 130726L03

Parameter Spike Added Conc. Recovered LCS %Rec. %Rec. CL Qualifiers

Naphthalene 2.000 1.641 82 21-133

2-Methylnaphthalene 2.000 1.737 87 21-140

1-Methylnaphthalene 2.000 1.598 80 20-140

Acenaphthylene 2.000 1.600 80 33-145

Acenaphthene 2.000 1.610 81 55-121

Fluorene 2.000 1.671 84 59-121

Phenanthrene 2.000 1.481 74 54-120

Anthracene 2.000 1.351 68 27-133

Fluoranthene 2.000 1.473 74 26-137

Pyrene 2.000 1.584 79 45-129

Benzo (a) Anthracene 2.000 1.568 78 33-143

Chrysene 2.000 1.502 75 17-168

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene 2.000 1.631 82 24-159

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene 2.000 1.633 82 24-159

Benzo (a) Pyrene 2.000 1.698 85 17-163

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene 2.000 1.545 77 25-175

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene 2.000 1.326 66 25-175

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene 2.000 1.241 62 25-157

Quality Control - LCS

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 07/25/13

Work Order: 13-07-1671

Preparation: EPA 3510C

Method: EPA 8270C SIM PAHs

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 3 of5

 RPD: Relative Percent Difference. CL: Control Limits

Return to Contents

Page 38 of 48
Quality Control Sample ID Matrix Instrument Date Prepared Date Analyzed LCS/LCSD Batch Number

099-13-057-26 Aqueous GC/MS LL 07/30/13 07/30/13 18:56 130730L02

Parameter Spike

Added

LCS

Conc.

LCS

%Rec.

LCSD

Conc.

LCSD

%Rec.

%Rec. CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers

Acetone 50.00 75.72 151 N/A N/A 40-140 N/A 0-20

Benzene 50.00 53.87 108 N/A N/A 80-120 N/A 0-20

Bromodichloromethane 50.00 50.21 100 N/A N/A 75-120 N/A 0-20

Bromoform 50.00 58.22 116 N/A N/A 70-130 N/A 0-20

Bromomethane 50.00 58.56 117 N/A N/A 30-145 N/A 0-20

2-Butanone 50.00 59.63 119 N/A N/A 30-150 N/A 0-20

Carbon Tetrachloride 50.00 50.51 101 N/A N/A 65-140 N/A 0-20

Chlorobenzene 50.00 50.85 102 N/A N/A 80-120 N/A 0-20

Chloroethane 50.00 51.79 104 N/A N/A 60-135 N/A 0-20

Chloroform 50.00 49.70 99 N/A N/A 65-135 N/A 0-20

Chloromethane 50.00 51.81 104 N/A N/A 40-125 N/A 0-20

Dibromochloromethane 50.00 54.93 110 N/A N/A 60-135 N/A 0-20

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 50.00 48.78 98 N/A N/A 50-130 N/A 0-20

1,2-Dibromoethane 50.00 54.27 109 N/A N/A 80-120 N/A 0-20

1,2-Dichlorobenzene 50.00 50.66 101 N/A N/A 70-120 N/A 0-20

1,3-Dichlorobenzene 50.00 51.06 102 N/A N/A 75-125 N/A 0-20

1,4-Dichlorobenzene 50.00 53.41 107 N/A N/A 75-125 N/A 0-20

1,1-Dichloroethane 50.00 50.23 100 N/A N/A 70-135 N/A 0-20

1,2-Dichloroethane 50.00 49.86 100 N/A N/A 70-130 N/A 0-20

1,1-Dichloroethene 50.00 49.81 100 N/A N/A 70-130 N/A 0-20

c-1,2-Dichloroethene 50.00 52.16 104 N/A N/A 70-125 N/A 0-20

t-1,2-Dichloroethene 50.00 53.49 107 N/A N/A 60-140 N/A 0-20

1,2-Dichloropropane 50.00 53.34 107 N/A N/A 75-125 N/A 0-20

c-1,3-Dichloropropene 50.00 59.86 120 N/A N/A 70-130 N/A 0-20

t-1,3-Dichloropropene 50.00 46.32 93 N/A N/A 55-140 N/A 0-20

Ethylbenzene 50.00 54.54 109 N/A N/A 75-125 N/A 0-20

Methylene Chloride 50.00 54.06 108 N/A N/A 55-140 N/A 0-20

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 50.00 54.61 109 N/A N/A 60-135 N/A 0-20

Styrene 50.00 55.76 112 N/A N/A 65-135 N/A 0-20

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 50.00 53.71 107 N/A N/A 80-130 N/A 0-20

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 50.00 54.37 109 N/A N/A 65-130 N/A 0-20

Tetrachloroethene 50.00 53.54 107 N/A N/A 45-150 N/A 0-20

Toluene 50.00 52.86 106 N/A N/A 75-120 N/A 0-20

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 50.00 57.01 114 N/A N/A 65-135 N/A 0-20

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 50.00 48.94 98 N/A N/A 65-130 N/A 0-20

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene 50.00 54.06 108 N/A N/A 50-140 N/A 0-20

1,1,2-Trichloroethane 50.00 53.95 108 N/A N/A 75-125 N/A 0-20

Quality Control - LCS/LCSD

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 07/25/13

Work Order: 13-07-1671

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 4 of5

 RPD: Relative Percent Difference. CL: Control Limits

Return to Contents

Page 39 of 48
Parameter Spike

Added

LCS

Conc.

LCS

%Rec.

LCSD

Conc.

LCSD

%Rec.

%Rec. CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers

Trichloroethene 50.00 52.76 106 N/A N/A 70-125 N/A 0-20

1,2,3-Trichloropropane 50.00 51.92 104 N/A N/A 75-125 N/A 0-20

Vinyl Chloride 50.00 50.66 101 N/A N/A 50-145 N/A 0-20

p/m-Xylene 100.0 106.1 106 N/A N/A 75-130 N/A 0-20

o-Xylene 50.00 51.18 102 N/A N/A 80-120 N/A 0-20

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) 50.00 47.32 95 N/A N/A 65-125 N/A 0-20

Gasoline Range Organics 1000 1013 101 939.9 94 80-120 8 0-20

Quality Control - LCS/LCSD

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 07/25/13

Work Order: 13-07-1671

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 5 of5

 RPD: Relative Percent Difference. CL: Control Limits

Return to Contents

Page 40 of 48
Method Extraction Chemist ID Instrument Analytical Location

EPA 6020 EPA 3020A Total 598 ICP/MS 03 1

EPA 8015B (M) EPA 3510C 682 GC 45 1

EPA 8270C SIM PAHs EPA 3510C 773 GC/MS AAA 1

GC/MS / EPA 8260B EPA 5030C 670 GC/MS LL 2

Sample Analysis Summary Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Work Order: 13-07-1671 Page 1 of1

 Location 1: 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841

 Location 2: 7445 Lampson Avenue, Garden Grove, CA 92841

Return to Contents

Page 41 of 48
Qualifiers Definition

* See applicable analysis comment.

< Less than the indicated value.

> Greater than the indicated value.

1 Surrogate compound recovery was out of control due to a required sample dilution. Therefore, the sample data was reported without further

clarification.

2 Surrogate compound recovery was out of control due to matrix interference. The associated method blank surrogate spike compound was

in control and, therefore, the sample data was reported without further clarification.

3 Recovery of the Matrix Spike (MS) or Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) compound was out of control due to suspected matrix interference. The

associated LCS recovery was in control.

4 The MS/MSD RPD was out of control due to suspected matrix interference.

5 The PDS/PDSD or PES/PESD associated with this batch of samples was out of control due to suspected matrix interference.

6 Surrogate recovery below the acceptance limit.

7 Surrogate recovery above the acceptance limit.

B Analyte was present in the associated method blank.

BU Sample analyzed after holding time expired.

BV Sample received after holding time expired.

DL The Detection Limit (DL) is the smallest analyte concentration that can be demonstrated to be different from zero or a blank concentration at

the 99% level of confidence.

E Concentration exceeds the calibration range.

ET Sample was extracted past end of recommended max. holding time.

HD The chromatographic pattern was inconsistent with the profile of the reference fuel standard.

ICH Initial calibration verification recovery is above the control limit for this analyte.

ICJ Initial calibration verification recovery is below the control limit for this analyte.

IH Calibration verification recovery is above the control limit for this analyte.

IJ Calibration verification recovery is below the control limit for this analyte.

J Analyte was detected at a concentration below the LOQ and above the DL. Reported value is estimated.

LOD The Limit of Detection (LOD) is the smallest amount or concentration of a substance that must be present in a sample in order to be

detected at 99% confidence level.

LOQ The Limit of Quantitation (LOQ) is the lowest concentration of a substance that produces a quantitative result within specified limits of

precision and bias.

Q Spike recovery and RPD control limits do not apply resulting from the parameter concentration in the sample exceeding the spike

concentration by a factor of four or greater.

SG The sample extract was subjected to Silica Gel treatment prior to analysis.

U Undetected at Detection Limit (DL) and is reported as less than the Limit of Detection (LOD).

X % Recovery and/or RPD out-of-range.

Z Analyte presence was not confirmed by second column or GC/MS analysis.

Solid - Unless otherwise indicated, solid sample data is reported on a wet weight basis, not corrected for % moisture. All QC results are

reported on a wet weight basis.

Any parameter identified in 40CFR Part 136.3 Table II that is designated as "analyze immediately" with a holding time of <= 15 minutes

(40CFR-136.3 Table II, footnote 4), is considered a "field" test and the reported results will be qualified as being received outside of the

stated holding time unless received at the laboratory within 15 minutes of the collection time.

A calculated total result (Example: Total Pesticides) is the summation of each component concentration and/or, if "J" flags are reported,

estimated concentration. Component concentrations showing not detected (ND) are summed into the calculated total result as zero

concentrations.

Glossary of Terms and Qualifiers

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Work Order: 13-07-1671 Page 1 of1

Return to Contents

Page 42 of 48
Return to Contents

Page 43 of 48
Return to Contents

Page 44 of 48
Return to Contents

Page 45 of 48
Return to Contents

Page 46 of 48
Return to Contents

Page 47 of 48
Return to Contents

Page 48 of 48
WORK ORDER NUMBER: 13-07-1671

Analytical Report For

Client: Environmental Science International, Inc.

Client Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066

Attention: Robert Chong

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Approved for release on by:

Richard Villafania

Project Manager

AIR SOIL WATER MARINE CHEMISTRY

Calscience Environmental Laboratories, Inc. (Calscience) certifies that the test results provided in this report meet all NELAC requirements for parameters for which

accreditation is required or available. Any exceptions to NELAC requirements are noted in the case narrative. The original report of subcontracted analyses, if any,

is attached to this report. The results in this report are limited to the sample(s) tested and any reproduction thereof must be made in its entirety. The client or

recipient of this report is specifically prohibited from making material changes to said report and, to the extent that such changes are made, Calscience is not

responsible, legally or otherwise. The client or recipient agrees to indemnify Calscience for any defense to any litigation which may arise.

08/01/2013

Supplemental Report 1

Page 1 of 14
Contents

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Client Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066

Work Order Number: 13-07-1671

1 Work Order Narrative. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

2 Client Sample Data. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

2.1 EPA 200.8 ICP/MS Metals (Aqueous). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

3 Quality Control Sample Data. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

3.1 MS/MSD. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

3.2 LCS/LCSD. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

4 Sample Analysis Summary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

5 Glossary of Terms and Qualifiers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

6 Chain of Custody/Sample Receipt Form. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

Page 2 of 14
Condition Upon Receipt:

Samples were received under Chain of Custody (COC) on 07/25/13. They were assigned to Work Order 13-07-1671.

Unless otherwise noted on the Sample Receiving forms all samples were received in good condition and within the

recommended EPA temperature criteria for the methods noted on the COC. The COC and Sample Receiving Documents are

integral elements of the analytical report and are presented at the back of the report.

Holding Times:

All samples were analyzed within prescribed holding times (HT) and/or in accordance with the Calscience Sample Acceptance

Policy unless otherwise noted in the analytical report and/or comprehensive case narrative, if required.

Any parameter identified in 40CFR Part 136.3 Table II that is designated as "analyze immediately" with a holding time of <= 15

minutes (40CFR-136.3 Table II, footnote 4), is considered a "field" test and the reported results will be qualified as being

received outside of the stated holding time unless received at the laboratory within 15 minutes of the collection time.

Quality Control:

All quality control parameters (QC) were within established control limits except where noted in the QC summary forms or

described further within this report.

Additional Comments:

Solid - Unless otherwise indicated, solid sample data is reported on a wet weight basis, not corrected for % moisture. All QC

results are always reported on a wet weight basis.

Due to analytical instrument issues for the GRO/Volatiles analysis, samples ES 028, ES 029, ES 030, and ES 031 were not

analyzed within the recommended holding time of 7 days for unpreserved samples. The samples were analyzed on the 8th

day after the sample collection date. Calscience is evaluating contingency measures to prevent similar issues going forward

though recommends that an additional set of HCl-preserved sample vials be collected to extend the analytical holding time if

needed.

Subcontractor Information:

Unless otherwise noted below (or on the subcontract form), no samples were subcontracted.

Work Order Narrative

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Work Order: 13-07-1671 Page 1 of1

Return to Contents

Page 3 of 14
Client Sample Number Lab Sample

Number

Date/Time

Collected

Matrix Instrument Date

Prepared

Date/Time

Analyzed

QC Batch ID

ES 032 UF 13-07-1671-7-A 07/23/13

09:30

Aqueous ICP/MS 03 07/26/13 07/26/13

16:26

130726L01

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

Parameter Result RL MDL DF Qualifiers

Lead 0.300 1.00 0.0898 1

Method Blank 099-10-008-2405 N/A Aqueous ICP/MS 03 07/26/13 07/26/13

14:07

130726L01

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

Parameter Result RL MDL DF Qualifiers

Lead <0.0898 1.00 0.0898 1 U

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 07/25/13

Work Order: 13-07-1671

Preparation: N/A

Method: EPA 200.8

Units: ug/L

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 1 of1

 RL: Reporting Limit. DF: Dilution Factor. MDL: Method Detection Limit.

Return to Contents

Page 4 of 14
Quality Control Sample ID Matrix Instrument Date Prepared Date Analyzed MS/MSD Batch Number

13-07-1774-1 Aqueous ICP/MS 03 07/26/13 07/26/13 14:16 130726S01

Parameter Sample

Conc.

Spike

Added

MS

Conc.

MS

%Rec.

MSD

Conc.

MSD

%Rec.

%Rec. CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers

Lead ND 100.0 110.0 110 107.1 107 80-120 3 0-20

Quality Control - Spike/Spike Duplicate

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 07/25/13

Work Order: 13-07-1671

Preparation: N/A

Method: EPA 200.8

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 1 of1

 RPD: Relative Percent Difference. CL: Control Limits

Return to Contents

Page 5 of 14
Quality Control Sample ID Matrix Instrument Date Analyzed LCS Batch Number

099-10-008-2405 Aqueous ICP/MS 03 07/26/13 14:13 130726L01

Parameter Spike Added Conc. Recovered LCS %Rec. %Rec. CL Qualifiers

Lead 100.0 96.79 97 80-120

Quality Control - LCS

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 07/25/13

Work Order: 13-07-1671

Preparation: N/A

Method: EPA 200.8

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 1 of1

 RPD: Relative Percent Difference. CL: Control Limits

Return to Contents

Page 6 of 14
Method Extraction Chemist ID Instrument Analytical Location

EPA 200.8 N/A 598 ICP/MS 03 1

Sample Analysis Summary Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Work Order: 13-07-1671 Page 1 of1

 Location 1: 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841

Return to Contents

Page 7 of 14
Qualifiers Definition

* See applicable analysis comment.

< Less than the indicated value.

> Greater than the indicated value.

1 Surrogate compound recovery was out of control due to a required sample dilution. Therefore, the sample data was reported without further

clarification.

2 Surrogate compound recovery was out of control due to matrix interference. The associated method blank surrogate spike compound was

in control and, therefore, the sample data was reported without further clarification.

3 Recovery of the Matrix Spike (MS) or Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) compound was out of control due to suspected matrix interference. The

associated LCS recovery was in control.

4 The MS/MSD RPD was out of control due to suspected matrix interference.

5 The PDS/PDSD or PES/PESD associated with this batch of samples was out of control due to suspected matrix interference.

6 Surrogate recovery below the acceptance limit.

7 Surrogate recovery above the acceptance limit.

B Analyte was present in the associated method blank.

BU Sample analyzed after holding time expired.

BV Sample received after holding time expired.

E Concentration exceeds the calibration range.

ET Sample was extracted past end of recommended max. holding time.

HD The chromatographic pattern was inconsistent with the profile of the reference fuel standard.

HDH The sample chromatographic pattern for TPH matches the chromatographic pattern of the specified standard but heavier hydrocarbons

were also present (or detected).

HDL The sample chromatographic pattern for TPH matches the chromatographic pattern of the specified standard but lighter hydrocarbons were

also present (or detected).

J Analyte was detected at a concentration below the reporting limit and above the laboratory method detection limit. Reported value is

estimated.

ME LCS Recovery Percentage is within Marginal Exceedance (ME) Control Limit range (+/- 4 SD from the mean).

ND Parameter not detected at the indicated reporting limit.

Q Spike recovery and RPD control limits do not apply resulting from the parameter concentration in the sample exceeding the spike

concentration by a factor of four or greater.

SG The sample extract was subjected to Silica Gel treatment prior to analysis.

U Undetected at the laboratory method detection limit.

X % Recovery and/or RPD out-of-range.

Z Analyte presence was not confirmed by second column or GC/MS analysis.

Solid - Unless otherwise indicated, solid sample data is reported on a wet weight basis, not corrected for % moisture. All QC results are

reported on a wet weight basis.

Any parameter identified in 40CFR Part 136.3 Table II that is designated as "analyze immediately" with a holding time of <= 15 minutes

(40CFR-136.3 Table II, footnote 4), is considered a "field" test and the reported results will be qualified as being received outside of the

stated holding time unless received at the laboratory within 15 minutes of the collection time.

A calculated total result (Example: Total Pesticides) is the summation of each component concentration and/or, if "J" flags are reported,

estimated concentration. Component concentrations showing not detected (ND) are summed into the calculated total result as zero

concentrations.

Glossary of Terms and Qualifiers

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Work Order: 13-07-1671 Page 1 of1

Return to Contents

Page 8 of 14
Return to Contents

Page 9 of 14
Return to Contents

Page 10 of 14
Return to Contents

Page 11 of 14
Return to Contents

Page 12 of 14
Return to Contents

Page 13 of 14
Return to Contents

Page 14 of 14
APPENDIX D 

Historical Groundwater Exceedance Trends 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
0

5

101520253035404550556065707580859095

100105

2/17/2005

6/28/2005

9/8/2005

  9/20/2005

12/6/2005

  7/10/2006

12/5/2006

3/27/2007

6/12/2007

9/10/2007

1/15/2008

4/15/2008

7/29/2008

10/22/2008

2/4/2009

5/13/2009

7/15/2009

10/14/2009

1/27/2010

4/13/2010

7/13/2010

11/3/2010

1/20/2011

4/28/2011

7/20/2011

11/2/2011

2/14/2012

4/17/2012

7/20/2012

10/22/2012

2/4/2013

4/22/2013

7/22/2013

Concentration (μg/L)

Date

TPH‐g Concentrations for RHMW01

DOH EAL Gross C

Drinking Water T

TPH‐g using EPA TPH‐g using EPA 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
0

50

100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950

10001050110011501200125013001350140014501500

2/17/2005

6/28/2005

9/8/2005

9/20/2005

12/6/2005

  7/10/2006

12/5/2006

3/27/2007

6/12/2007

9/10/2007

1/15/2008

4/15/2008

7/29/2008

10/22/2008

2/4/2009

5/13/2009

7/15/2009

10/14/2009

1/27/2010

4/13/2010

7/13/2010

11/3/2010

1/20/2011

4/28/2011

7/20/2011

11/2/2011

2/14/2012

4/17/2012

7/20/2012

10/22/2012

2/4/2013

4/22/2013

7/22/2013

Concentration (μg/L)

Date

TPH‐d Concentrations for RHMW01

DOH EAL GDOH EAL DTPH‐d (μg/L
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
0

123456789

10

2/17/2005

6/28/2005

9/8/2005

9/20/2005

12/6/2005

  7/10/2006

12/5/2006

3/27/2007

6/12/2007

9/10/2007

1/15/2008

4/15/2008

7/29/2008

10/22/2008

2/4/2009

5/13/2009

7/15/2009

10/14/2009

1/27/2010

4/13/2010

7/13/2010

11/3/2010

1/20/2011

4/28/2011

7/20/2011

11/2/2011

2/14/2012

4/17/2012

7/20/2012

10/22/2012

2/4/2013

4/22/2013

7/22/2013

Concentration (μg/L)

Date

1‐Methylnaphthalene Concentrations for RHMW01

DOH EAL GDOH EAL D1‐Methylna
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
0

255075

100125150175200225250275300325350375400425450475500525550575600625650675

9/20/2005

7/10/2006

12/5/2006

3/27/2007

6/12/2007

9/10/2007

1/15/2008

4/15/2008

7/29/2008

10/22/2008

2/4/2009

5/13/2009

7/15/2009

10/13/2009

1/26/2010

4/13/2010

7/13/2010

10/18/2010

1/18/2011

4/19/2011

7/19/2011

10/24/2011

1/26/2012

4/16/2012

7/18/2012

10/22/2012

1/28/2013

4/22/2013

7/22/2013

Concentration (μg/L)

Date

TPH‐g Concentrations for RHMW02

DOH EAL Gross C

Drinking Water T

TPH‐g using EPA TPH‐g using EPA 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
0

200400600800

100012001400160018002000220024002600280030003200340036003800400042004400460048005000520054005600

9/20/2005

7/10/2006

12/5/2006

3/27/2007

6/12/2007

9/10/2007

1/15/2008

4/15/2008

7/29/2008

10/22/2008

2/4/2009

5/13/2009

7/15/2009

10/13/2009

1/26/2010

4/13/2010

7/13/2010

10/18/2010

1/18/2011

4/19/2011

7/19/2011

10/24/2011

1/26/2012

4/16/2012

7/18/2012

10/22/2012

1/28/2013

4/22/2013

7/22/2013

Concentration (μg/L)

Date

TPH‐d Concentrations for RHMW02

DOH EAL GDOH EAL DTPH‐d (μg/L
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
0

255075

100125150175200225250275300325

9/20/2005

7/10/2006

12/5/2006

3/27/2007

6/12/2007

9/10/2007

1/15/2008

4/15/2008

7/29/2008

10/22/2008

2/4/2009

5/13/2009

7/15/2009

10/13/2009

1/26/2010

4/13/2010

7/13/2010

10/18/2010

1/18/2011

4/19/2011

7/19/2011

10/24/2011

1/26/2012

4/16/2012

7/18/2012

10/22/2012

1/28/2013

4/22/2013

7/22/2013

Concentration (μg/L)

Date

Trichloroethylene Concentrations for RHMW02

DOH EAL GDOH EAL DTrichloroet
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
0

102030405060708090

100110

9/20/2005

7/10/2006

12/5/2006

3/27/2007

6/12/2007

9/10/2007

1/15/2008

4/15/2008

7/29/2008

10/22/2008

2/4/2009

5/13/2009

7/15/2009

10/13/2009

1/26/2010

4/13/2010

7/13/2010

10/18/2010

1/18/2011

4/19/2011

7/19/2011

10/24/2011

1/26/2012

4/16/2012

7/18/2012

10/22/2012

1/28/2013

4/22/2013

7/22/2013

Concentration (μg/L)

Date

1‐Methylnaphthalene Concentrations for RHMW02

DOH EAL GrDOH EAL Dr1‐Methylna
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
0

102030405060708090

9/20/2005

7/10/2006

12/5/2006

3/27/2007

6/12/2007

9/10/2007

1/15/2008

4/15/2008

7/29/2008

10/22/2008

2/4/2009

5/13/2009

7/15/2009

10/13/2009

1/26/2010

4/13/2010

7/13/2010

10/18/2010

1/18/2011

4/19/2011

7/19/2011

10/24/2011

1/26/2012

4/16/2012

7/18/2012

10/22/2012

1/28/2013

4/22/2013

7/22/2013

Concentration (μg/L)

Date

2‐Methylnaphthalene Concentrations for RHMW02

DOH EAL GrDOH EAL Dr2‐Methylna
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
0

102030405060708090

100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350

9/20/2005

7/10/2006

12/5/2006

3/27/2007

6/12/2007

9/10/2007

1/15/2008

4/15/2008

7/29/2008

10/22/2008

2/4/2009

5/13/2009

7/15/2009

10/13/2009

1/26/2010

4/13/2010

7/13/2010

10/18/2010

1/18/2011

4/19/2011

7/19/2011

10/24/2011

1/26/2012

4/16/2012

7/18/2012

10/22/2012

1/28/2013

4/22/2013

7/22/2013

Concentration (μg/l)

Date

Naphthalene Concentrations for RHMW02

DOH EAL GrosDOH EAL DrinkNaphthalene uNaphthalene u
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
0

5

101520253035404550556065707580859095

100105

9/21/2005

7/10/2006

12/5/2006

3/27/2007

6/12/2007

9/10/2007

1/15/2008

4/15/2008

7/29/2008

10/22/2008

2/4/2009

5/13/2009

7/15/2009

10/14/2009

1/27/2010

4/13/2010

7/13/2010

10/18/2010

1/19/2011

4/20/2011

7/19/2011

10/24/2011

1/26/2012

4/16/2012

7/18/2012

10/22/2012

1/28/2013

4/22/2013

7/22/2013

Concentration (μg/L)

Date

TPH‐g Concentrations for RHMW03

DOH EAL 

DOH EAL 

TPH‐g usiTPH‐g usi
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
0

255075

100125150175200225250275300325350

9/21/2005

7/10/2006

12/5/2006

3/27/2007

6/12/2007

9/10/2007

1/15/2008

4/15/2008

7/29/2008

10/22/2008

2/4/2009

5/13/2009

7/15/2009

10/14/2009

1/27/2010

4/13/2010

7/13/2010

10/18/2010

1/19/2011

4/20/2011

7/19/2011

10/24/2011

1/26/2012

4/16/2012

7/18/2012

10/22/2012

1/28/2013

4/22/2013

7/22/2013

Concentration (μg/L)

Date

TPH‐d Concentrations for RHMW03

DOH EAL GDOH EAL DTPH‐d (μg/L
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
0

5

101520253035404550556065707580859095

100105

5/13/2009

7/15/2009

10/13/2009

1/26/2010

4/13/2010

7/13/2010

10/20/2010

1/19/2011

4/20/2011

7/19/2011

10/25/2011

2/1/2012

4/16/2012

7/17/2012

10/22/2012

1/29/2013

4/23/2013

7/23/2013

Concentration (μg/L)

Date

TPH‐g Concentrations for RHMW05

DOH EAL Gross C

Drinking Water T

TPH‐g using EPA TPH‐g using EPA 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
0

100200300400500600700800900

100011001200130014001500160017001800190020002100

5/13/2009

7/15/2009

10/13/2009

1/26/2010

4/13/2010

7/13/2010

10/20/2010

1/19/2011

4/20/2011

7/19/2011

10/25/2011

2/1/2012

4/16/2012

7/17/2012

10/22/2012

1/29/2013

4/23/2013

7/23/2013

Concentration (μg/L)

Date

TPH‐d Concentrations for RHMW05

DOH EAL GDOH EAL DTPH‐d (μg/L
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
0

5

101520253035404550556065707580859095

100105

9/19/2005

7/10/2006

12/5/2006

3/27/2007

6/12/2007

9/10/2007

1/15/2008

4/15/2008

7/29/2008

10/22/2008

12/16/2008

2/4/2009

5/13/2009

7/15/2009

10/14/2009

1/27/2010

4/13/2010

7/13/2010

10/19/2010

1/20/2011

4/19/2011

7/20/2011

10/25/2011

2/1/2012

4/17/2012

7/17/2012

10/22/2012

1/29/2013

4/23/2013

7/23/2013

Concentration (μg/L)

Date

TPH‐g Concentrations for RHMW2254‐01

DOH EAL Gross C

Drinking Water T

TPH‐g using EPA TPH‐g using EPA 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
0

102030405060708090

100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330

9/19/2005

7/10/2006

12/5/2006

3/27/2007

6/12/2007

9/10/2007

1/15/2008

4/15/2008

7/29/2008

10/22/2008

12/16/2008

2/4/2009

5/13/2009

7/15/2009

10/14/2009

1/27/2010

4/13/2010

7/13/2010

10/19/2010

1/20/2011

4/19/2011

7/20/2011

10/25/2011

2/1/2012

4/17/2012

7/17/2012

10/22/2012

1/29/2013

4/23/2013

7/23/2013

Concentration (μg/L)

Date

TPH‐d Concentrations for RHMW2254‐01

DOH EAL GDOH EAL DTPH‐d (μg/L
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
APPENDIX E 

Waste Disposal Manifest 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.