alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than September 2, 2009.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco**                     (Kenneth Binning, Vice President, Applications and Enforcement) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, California 94105-1579:                

*1. Alan Isaac Rothenberg*, Beverly Hills, California; to acquire at least 10 percent of the voting shares of 1st Century Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of 1st Century Bank, N.A., both of Los Angeles, California.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 13, 2009.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. E9-19743 Filed 8-17-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
IIA

Calendar No. 18

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 1

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 27 (legislative day, JANUARY 10), 1995

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution

of the United States.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission

9 to the States for ratification:
2

•HJ 1 PCS

1 ‘‘ARTICLE—

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. Total outlays for any fiscal year shall

3 not exceed total receipts for that fiscal year, unless three4 fifths of the whole number of each House of Congress shall

5 provide by law for a specific excess of outlays over receipts

6 by a rollcall vote.

7 ‘‘SECTION 2. The limit on the debt of the United

8 States held by the public shall not be increased, unless

9 three-fifths of the whole number of each House shall pro10 vide by law for such an increase by a rollcall vote.

11 ‘‘SECTION 3. Prior to each fiscal year, the President

12 shall transmit to the Congress a proposed budget for the

13 United States Government for that fiscal year in which

14 total outlays do not exceed total receipts.

15 ‘‘SECTION 4. No bill to increase revenue shall become

16 law unless approved by a majority of the whole number

17 of each House by a rollcall vote.

18 ‘‘SECTION 5. The Congress may waive the provisions

19 of this article for any fiscal year in which a declaration

20 of war is in effect. The provisions of this article may be

21 waived for any fiscal year in which the United States is

22 engaged in military conflict which causes an imminent and

23 serious military threat to national security and is so de24 clared by a joint resolution, adopted by a majority of the

25 whole number of each House, which becomes law.
3

•HJ 1 PCS

1 ‘‘SECTION 6. The Congress shall enforce and imple2 ment this article by appropriate legislation, which may rely

3 on estimates of outlays and receipts.

4 ‘‘SECTION 7. Total receipts shall include all receipts

5 of the United States Government except those derived

6 from borrowing. Total outlays shall include all outlays of

7 the United States Government except for those for repay8 ment of debt principal.

9 ‘‘SECTION 8. This article shall take effect beginning

10 with fiscal year 2002 or with the second fiscal year begin11 ning after its ratification, whichever is later.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives January 26,

1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
Calendar No. 18

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 1

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the

Constitution of the United States.

JANUARY 27 (legislative day, JANUARY 10), 1995

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1123

To repeal statutory limitations on the transportation of chemical munitions.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 3, 1995

Mr. BROWDER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on National Security

A BILL

To repeal statutory limitations on the transportation of

chemical munitions.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF STATUTORY LIMITATIONS ON THE

4 TRANSPORTATION OF CHEMICAL MUNI5 TIONS.

6 (a) PUBLIC LAW 103–335.—Section 8088 of the De7 partment of Defense Appropriations Act, 1995 (Public

8 Law 103–335; 108 Stat. 2638), is repealed.

9 (b) PUBLIC LAW 103–337.—Section 143 of the Na10 tional Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995
2

•HR 1123 IH

1 (Public Law 103–337; 108 Stat. 2689; 50 U.S.C. 1512a),

2 is repealed.

Æ
39803.

#### MITCHELL v. THE STATE.

Frankum, Judge.

Where a consignor delivered property for the purpose of sale to a consignee under an oral agreement that the consignee was to hold and remit to the consignor the wholesale price of the property at designated times after the sale thereof, but where subsequently to such agreement the consignor accompanied the consignee to a bank and consented to the consignee’s executing a bill of sale to secure debt to the bank transferring title to the property in question for the purpose of securing a loan; and where the consignor further signed as surety on the note evidencing the debt, the actions of the consignor were inconsistent with and abrogated the previous oral contract of consignment because the contract of consignment presupposed that legal title would remain in the consignor until payment for the goods delivered under the consignment. The relationship between the consignor and consignee was converted by such acts of the consignor to that of debtor and creditor. Consequently, in this case the evidence showing the foregoing facts was insufficient to support a conviction of the defendant under an indictment which charged him with larceny after trust, in that he converted the proceeds of the sale of the property in question, title to which was alleged in the indictment to have been in the consignor, since the evidence showed that title to the property was in the bank, and the failure of the defendant to pay the consignor the price thereof amounted to the mere failure of the defendant to pay a debt.

*260Decided January 25, 1963.

*Robert E. Lanyon,*for plaintiff in error.

*William M. West, Solicitor General, Jack J. Gautier,*contra.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.*
DENY Nunc Pro Tunc; and Opinion Filed December 16, 2013.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-13-01443-CV

IN RE THOMAS J. ELLIS, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-1010227

MEMORANDUM OPINION NUNC PRO TUNC

Before Justices O'Neill, Lang-Miers, and Evans 

Opinion by Justice O'Neill

Relator contends the trial judge erred in granting summary judgment. The facts and 

issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record 

before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). 

Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

131443F.P05

/Michael J. O'Neill/

MICHAEL J. O'NEILL

JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 154 (Wednesday, August 12, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 40596]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19301]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. [thinsp]225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than August 25, 2009.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston (Richard Walker, Community 
Affairs Officer) P.O. Box 55882, Boston, Massachusetts 02106-2204:
    1. Warbury Pincus Private Equity X, L.P., and Warbury Pincus X 
Partners, L.P., and their controlling affiliates which consist of, 
Warburg Pincus X, L.P., general partner of notificants, Warbury Pincus 
and Co., Warburg Pincus Partners, LLC, Warburg Pincus X, LLC, and 
Warburg Pincus LLC; to acquire additional voting shares of Webster 
Financial Corporation, Waterbury, Connecticut and thereby indirectly 
acquire Webster Bank, National Association, Waterbury, Connecticut.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Glenda Wilson, Community 
Affairs Officer) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:
    1. Thomas H. Smith, Melinda G. Smith and Kerry A. Smith, all of 
Lawrenceburg, Kentucky; to acquire control of Century Bancshares, Inc., 
Lawrenceburg, Kentucky and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of 
Century Bank of Kentucky, Inc., Lawrenceburg, Kentucky.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 7, 
2009.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-19301 Filed 8-11-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
#### § 1026.313 Aggregation.

Refer to § 1010.313 of this chapter for reports of transactions in currency aggregation requirements for futures commission merchants and introducing brokers in commodities.

[76 FR 10521, Feb. 25, 2011]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1163 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1163

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 8, 1995

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To authorize the exchange of National Park Service land in the Fire 
   Island National Seashore in the State of New York for land in the 
            Village of Patchogue, Suffolk County, New York.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF EXCHANGE.

    The Secretary of the Interior may exchange all right, title, and 
interest of the United States in and to certain National Park Service 
lands in the Fire Island National
Seashore in the State of New York, described in section 2, for all 
right, title, and interest of the Village of Patchogue, Suffolk County, 
New York, in and to certain lands in the Village of Patchogue, 
described in section 2, without further consideration.

SEC. 2. DESCRIPTION OF LANDS TO BE EXCHANGED.

    (a) National Park Lands.--The National Park Service lands in the 
Fire Island National Seashore, in the State of New York, referred to in 
section 1 are the lands generally depicted on the map entitled ``Fire 
Island National Seashore Land Exchange--Proposed'', dated October 1994.
    (b) Village of Patchogue Lands.--The lands in the Village of 
Patchogue, Suffolk County, New York, referred to in section 1 are the 
lands generally depicted on the map entitled ``Village of Patchogue 
Land Exchange--Proposed'', dated October 1994.
    (c) Maps.--The maps referred to in subsections (a) and (b) shall be 
on file and available for inspection in the Office of the Director of 
the National Park Service.

SEC. 3. LANDS ACQUIRED BY SECRETARY.

    The lands in the Village of Patchogue that are acquired by the 
Secretary of the Interior under section 1 shall be added to and 
administered as part of the Fire Island National Seashore.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 7, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
bdco_ex106.htm


EXHIBIT 10.6


 


July 30, 2012


 


Lazarus Energy LLC



801 Travis, Suite 2100


Houston, Texas   77002


Attention:  Jonathan Carroll







GEL Tex Marketing, LLC


Milam Services, Inc.


919 Milam, Suite 2100


Houston, Texas   77002


Attention:  Steve Nathanson


 


Re:     Amendment to Letter Agreement Regarding Expenses Payments and Reservation of Rights







Gentlemen:


 


Reference is made to that certain (i) Joint Marketing Agreement, dated August 12, 2011 (as amended, restated or supplemented from time to time, the "JMA"), by and between Lazarus Energy LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Lazarus"), and GEL Tex Marketing, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("GEL"), (ii) Construction and Funding Contract, dated August 12, 2011 (as amended, restated or supplemented fi:om time to time, the "CFC"), by and between Lazarus and Milam Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("MSI") and (i) Letter Agreement dated June 25, 2012 by and between GEL, MSI and Lazarus regarding expense payments and reservations of rights ("June Letter Agreement"). Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the CFC.


 


Lazarus, GEL and MSI hereby agree to amend the June Letter Agreement by (i) deleting the reference to "Monday July 30, 2012" in the fust sentence of the second paragraph and substituting therefor "Friday August 31, 2012" and (ii) agreeing that the Payments previously made or to be made can be made by either MSI or GEL as determined by MSI and GEL.


 


By execution of this Letter Agreement, Lazarus agrees and acknowledges that the Payments are not an obligation of GEL under this Letter Agreement or the June 25 Letter Agreement and may be discontinued by GEL in its sole discretion at any time.


 


NOTHING IN THIS LETTER AGREEMENT NOR THE  PAYMENT OF THE EXPENSE PAYMENTS TO LAZARUS SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO WAIVE, AMEND OR OTHERWISE MODIFY ANY RIGHTS OR REMEDIES AVAIALBLE TO LAZARUS, GEL OR MSI PURSUANT TO THE JMA, THE CFC, THE JUNE 25 LETTER AGREEMENT OR ANY OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENT OR BY OPERATION OF LAW OR OTHERWISE (WHICH RIGHTS SHALL BE CUMULATIVE), OR RELEASE GEL, MSJ OR LAZARUS FROM ANY OBLIGATIONS RELATING THERETO.  The terms of the JMA, the CFC, the June 25 Letter Agreement (such June 25 Letter Agreement, as amended hereby) and all other Contract Documents shall remain in full force and effect and continue to be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of Lazarus, GEL and MSI and their respective successors and assigns.







[Signature page follows.]


 




  





 











  











IN  WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Letter Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives effective as of the date first written above.
§ 17.110 Self-evaluation. ( a ) The agency shall, by two years after the effective date of this part, evaluate its current policies and practices, and the effects thereof, to determine if they meet the requirements of this part. To the extent modification of any such policy and practice is required, the agency shall proceed to make the necessary modifications.
( b ) The agency shall provide an opportunity to interested persons, including individuals with handicaps or organizations representing individuals with handicaps, to participate in the self-evaluation process.
( c ) The agency shall, until three years following the completion of the self-evaluation, maintain on file and make available for public inspection: ( 1 ) A description of areas examined and any problems identified; and
( 2 ) A description of any modifications made; and
( 3 ) A list of participants in the self-evaluation process.
SERVED: JUNE 1, 2015 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC IN THEMATTER OF PROFESSIONAL FLIGHT TRANSPORT, INC. DOCKETNO. FAA-2015-0638 (Civil Penalty Action)
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 201480190149) has been assignedto Administrative Law Judge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, the FAAHearing Docket, and the other persons onthe attached Service List.

Ronnie A. Yoder / ChiefAdministrative



### La~dge Attachment
- Service ListSERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL
Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 ORIGINAL & ONE COPY

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 ONE COPY DocketNo. FAA-2015-0638 (Civil Penalty Action)

Professional Flight Transport, Inc., Respondent DBA Windsor Jet Management Mark B. Goldstein, Respondent's Counsel 2700 N. Military Trail, Suite 130 Lilley James, Agent for Service Executive Airport Business Center 1835 S. Perimeter Rd. Suite 120 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309 Deitrick H. Johnson, Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel, ASO-7 BocaRaton, FL 33431 TEL: 561-989-9955 FAX: 561-989-9966

Federal Aviation Administration, Southern Region 1701 ColumbiaAvenue College Park, GA 30337 TEL: 404-305-5200 FAX: 404-305-5223 Hon. J.E. Sullivan,Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAX: 202-366-7536

1 Service was byU.S. Mail. For service inperson or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-
INJUNCTION AGAINST ENCROACHMENT ON STREET.

Court of Appeals for Hamilton County.

#### Peter Dreidame, a Tax-Payer, v. the City of Cincinnati, Frederick S. Spiegel, Christian R. Holmes, Harry L. Laws and Louis S. Levi, Constituting the Board of Hospital Commissioners of Said City.*

Decided, February 14, 1916.

*Vacation of Part of Street*— For *Use of Municipal Hospital*— Enjoined *on Petition of Tax-Payer*— On *the Ground that No Public Necessity for the Vacation Exists.*

The benefit which would result to the lawn and grounds of a municipal hospital by enclosing therein a part of a public street does not afford a sufficient reason for vacation of the street and consequent injury to the public, and such use of the street will be enjoined upon the petition of a tax-payer.

*Wm. Thorndylce,*for plaintiff.

*Walter M.*Schoenle, City Solicitor, and *Saul*Zielonka, Assistant City Solicitor, contra.

Jones (E. H.), P. J.

This case comes into this court on appeal from the court of common pleas.

*

 Motion for an order directing the Court of Appeals to certify its record overruled by the Supreme Court, June 6, 1916.

The plaintiff, Peter Dreidame, first asked the city solicitor of Cincinnati to bring the action, and upon the refusal of that official brought the action in his own name as a tax-payer. He seeks to enjoin the maintaining of an iron fence on the north curb line of Goodman street in the city of Cincinnati, between Burnét and Eden avenues.'

At the request of the trustees of the new city hospital the portion of Goodman street, between the north line of the street and the north curb line thereof and extending from Burnet avenue to Eden avenue, was vacated by the ordinance of the *608city council. This was clone at the instance and request of the trustees of said hospital, so as to permit them to enclose the strip so vacated and make it a part of the grounds or lawn of the hospital.

The case was submitted to us upon an agreed statement of facts. The ordinance vacating the portion of the street above described was repealed by the city council after the iron fence was built and the strip vacated was enclosed. ’ Later this action -was brought for injunction.

There was no showing made that there is any pubic necessity for the.vacation of said portion of the street or for the taking of this ground by the hospital authorities. By the ereetion of the fence the street at this point has been considerably narrowed and obstructed.

We are inclined to the opinion that under the circumstances as shown to the court an injury has thus been caused the general public here represented by plaintiff, for which there is no corresponding public necessity or demand for' the ground taken which had been dedicated to1 the general public for street purposes.' A permanent injunction will therefore be allowed against the maintenance of the iron fence and against the encroachment upon, and the obstruction of the street -caused thereby.

•Jones (Oliver B.), J., and Gorman, J., concur.