alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.8



LOGO

2016 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)

Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the Pooling and Servicing Agreement) dated as of December 1, 2016 by and among Morgan Stanley
Capital I Inc., as Depositor, Midland Loan Services, A Division of PNC Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Certificate Administrator and Trustee
and Park Bridge Lender Services, LLC as Operating Advisor Asset Representations Reviewer relating to the Morgan Stanley Capital I Trust 2016-UBS12, Commercial Mortgage Pass-through Certificates, Series 2016-UBS12

(MCSI 2016-UBS12)

The undersigned, a duly
authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the Special Servicer) herein certifies to the following:



| | 1. | All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of December 7, 2016 to December 31, 2016 (the Reporting Period) in accordance with the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and
if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof has been specifically identified herein.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|              |  |                                |  |  |  |                    
|------------- |  | ------------------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------
|Certified by: |  | /s/ Adam Singer                |  |  |  | Date: March 1, 2017
|              |  | Adam Singer, Managing Director |  |  |  |
#### § 403.25 Personal property subject to seizure.

Personal property may be seized by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue or his delegate for forfeiture to the United States when involved, used, or intended to be used, in violation of the internal revenue laws, other than chapters 51 (distilled spirits), 52 (tobacco) and 53 (firearms) of the I.R.C. (Sec. 7321, 68A Stat. 869; 26 U.S.C. 7321.)

(Sec. 7325, 68A Stat. 870, as amended (26 U.S.C. 7325 (1), (4)); sec. 7326, 72 Stat. 1429, as amended (26 U.S.C. 7326(a))

[T.D. 7433, 41 FR 39312, Sept. 15, 1976, as amended by T.D. 7525, 42 FR 64344, Dec. 23, 1977]
~'El(.Oyd.c* eo,,-k.,+S

+AA-2oI0-0Qsc.f

With whom Qll/sitle t/le FAA has Ihis proposal been discussed (Le. ATAJ R.4A, ALPA, etc.)?

NOTE: TIlts item should be completed prior to submission oftlte AD Proposal Worksheet.

Orr:ulIizatiOll

HawkcrBeechcraft

Person Contacted

Quentin Coon

Reaction
SERVED SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

THOMAS LYNCH 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP05SO0008 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS FAA-2005-20547 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

On September 29, 2004, the Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter 

"Complainant") and Thomas Lynch (hereinafter "Respondent") filed a joint Withdrawal of 

Complaint and Request for Hearing. 

14 C.F.R. § 13.215 states: "At any time before or during a hearing, an agency attorney 

may withdraw a complaint or party may withdraw a request for a hearing without the 

consent of the administrative law judge. If an agency attorney withdraws the complaint or 

a party withdraws the request for a hearing and the answer, the administrative law judge 

shall dismiss the proceedings under this subpart with prejudice." 

WHEREFORE, the within filed Withdrawal of Complaint and Request for Hearing 

having been read and considered, it is ORDERED as follows: 

1. The request to withdraw be and is hereby granted; 

2. This proceeding be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice; and 

gen/y counsel shall send to the Judge and the Hearing Docket a copy of any 

ordenthat the settlement produced. 

MicHar30 Goodwilti.Jl^ 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachments - Service List
Amendment No. 1 to Exponent, Inc. 1999 Stock Option Plan



 EXHIBIT 10.25 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO 
 EXPONENT, INC. 
 1999 STOCK OPTION PLAN 
 RECITALS: 
 A. The Board of Directors of Exponent, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), previously adopted the 1999 Stock Option Plan (the
“1999 Plan”), which was approved by the stockholders of the Company on May 5, 1999. 
 B. In light of revised proxy
statement disclosure requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, on January 29, 2007 the Board of Directors approved the following amendment to the definition of “Fair Market Value” in the 1999 Plan. 
 AMENDMENT: 
 1.
DEFINITION OF “FAIR MARKET VALUE” 
 Effective as of
January 29, 2007, Section 2(m) of the 1999 Plan is hereby amended and restated as follows: 
 “(m) “Fair
Market Value” means, as of any date, the value of Common Stock determined as follows: 
 (i) If the Common Stock is
listed on any established stock exchange or a national market system, including without limitation the Nasdaq Global Market or The Nasdaq Global Select Market, its Fair Market Value shall be the closing price for the Common Stock as quoted on such
exchange or system on the date of determination, or if the Shares are not trading on such date, then the closing price for the Common Stock on the last preceding trading day on which sales of the Shares are reported as having occurred, as reported
in The Wall Street Journal or such other source as the Administrator deems reliable; 
 (ii) If the Common Stock is regularly
quoted by a recognized securities dealer but selling prices are not reported, the Fair Market Value of a Share of Common Stock shall be the mean between the closing high bid and low asked prices for the Common Stock on the date of determination, or
if no prices are quoted for such date, then the mean between the closing high bid and low asked prices on the last preceding trading day on which any bid and asked prices were quoted, as reported in The Wall Street Journal or such other source as
the Administrator deems reliable; or 
 (iii) In the absence of an established market for the Common Stock, the Fair Market
Value shall be determined in good faith by the Administrator.” 
 2. MISCELLANEOUS 
 Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, the terms of the 1999 Plan remain in full force and effect.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 155 (Thursday, August 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 40811]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19287]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Eastern Arizona Counties Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Eastern Arizona Counties Resource Advisory Committee will 
meet in Show Low, Arizona. The purpose of the meeting is to review 
organizational processes, operating guidelines, and legal requirements 
of Resource Advisory Committee members in accordance with Public Law 
110-343 (the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self Determination 
Act).

DATES: The meeting will be held August 24, 2009 starting at 1 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in the conference room at the 
Holiday Inn Express, 151 West Deuce of Clubs, Show Low, Arizona 85901. 
Send written comments to Robert Dyson, Eastern Arizona Counties 
Resource Advisory Committee, c/o Forest Service, USDA, P.O. Box 640, 
Springerville, Arizona 85938 or electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6614021f15090826001548000302481315"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="41332538322e2f0127326f2724256f3432">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Dyson, Public Affairs Officer, 
Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests, (928)333-4301.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. This is 
an administrative and organizational meeting only and no project 
proposals will be reviewed. Committee discussion is limited to Forest 
Service staff and Committee members. However, persons who wish to bring 
Public Law 110-343 related matters to the attention of the Committee 
may file written statements with the Committee staff before or after 
the meeting. Opportunity for public input will be provided.

    Dated: August 6, 2009.
Chris Knopp,
Forest Supervisor, Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests.
[FR Doc. E9-19287 Filed 8-12-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Mel A. MARIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LASALLE NATIONAL BANK, N.A.; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-17237.

D.C. No. CV-01-00050-RCC.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 10, 2002.*

Decided June 13, 2002.

Before O’SCANNLAIN, BERZON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Mel A. Marin appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment for LaSalle National Bank and others alleging breach of contract, violation of the National Bank Act, and violation of the Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Relief Act in connection with the handling of a mortgage. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the district court’s summary judgment de novo, *Del E. Webb McQueen Dev. Corp. v. Resolution Trust Corp.,*69 F.3d 355, 358 (9th Cir.1995), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment to Defendants on all claims because Marin is not a party to the con*315tract under which he seeks redress. *See*12 U.S.C. § 86; 50 App.U.S.C. §§ 526, 581; *Leal v. Allstate Ins. Co.,*199 Ariz. 250, 17 P.3d 95, 99 (Ariz.Ct.App.2000); *Echols v. Beauty Built Homes, Inc.,*132 Ariz. 498, 647 P.2d 629, 631 (Ariz.1982).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Amendment No.1 to Exponent, Inc. 1999 Restricted Stock Plan



 EXHIBIT 10.26 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO 
 EXPONENT, INC. 
 RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD PLAN 
 RECITALS: 
 A. The Board of Directors of Exponent, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”), previously adopted the Restricted Stock Award Plan (the “Plan”), which was approved by the stockholder of the Company on May 5, 1999. 
 B. In light of revised proxy statement disclosure requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, on January 29, 2007 the Board of Directors
approved the following amendment to the definition of “Fair Market Value” in the Plan. 
 AMENDMENT:

 1. DEFINITION OF “FAIR MARKET VALUE” 
 Effective as of January 29, 2007, Section 2(n) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated as follows: 
 “(m) “Fair Market Value” means, as of any date, the value of Common Stock determined as follows: 
 (i) If the Common Stock is listed on any established stock exchange or a national market system, including without limitation the Nasdaq
Global Market or The Nasdaq Global Select Market, the Fair Market Value of a Share of Common Stock shall be the closing sales price for the Common Stock as quoted on such exchange or system on the date of determination, or if the Shares are not
trading on such date, then the closing sales price for the Common Stock on the last preceding trading day on which sales of the Common Stock are reported as having occurred, as reported in The Wall Street Journal or such other source as the
Administrator deems reliable; 
 (ii) If the Common Stock is regularly quoted by a recognized securities dealer but selling
prices are not reported, the Fair Market Value of a Share of Common Stock shall be the mean between the high bid and low asked prices for the Common Stock on the date of determination, or if no prices are quoted for such date, then the mean between
the high bid and low asked prices for the Common Stock on the last preceding trading day on which any bid and asked prices were quoted, as reported in The Wall Street Journal or such other source as the Administrator deems reliable; or 

(iii) In the absence of an established market for the Common Stock, the Fair Market Value shall be determined in good faith by the
Administrator.” 
 2. MISCELLANEOUS 
 Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, the terms of the Plan remain in full force and effect.
Summary of Bonuses



 Exhibit 10.2 
 Summary of Bonuses Awarded to Executive Officers of 
 Allin Corporation in Respect of 2006 
 On February 13, 2007, the Board of Directors of Allin Corporation awarded bonuses to its executive officers for the year ended December 31,
2006 as follows: 
 Richard W. Talarico, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President - $20,000 
 Dean C. Praskach, Chief Financial Officer - $5,000
Order entered July 1 8 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 00634
- CV TODD PRUETT, Appellant

V. MICHAEL PITTMAN, M.D . , Appellee On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Ca use No. DC
- 12
- 07463



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s July 15, 2013 motion for an extension of time to file a brief. Appellant explains that he needs the extension because he is trying to obtain a reporter’s record from a hearing in the 265th Judici al District Court of Dallas County, Texas . By order dated June 13, 2013, this Court denied appellant’s request that we order the court reporter of the 265th Judicial District Court to file the reporter’s record from a hearing held in that Court on Septemb er 13, 2013. Appellant is appealing the trial court’s order granting appellee’s motion to dismiss. The trial court conducted a hearing on appellee’s motion on January 22, 2013. By letter dated June 17, 2013, Stephanie Moses, Official Court Reporter for the 193rd Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas , inform ed this Court that no record was made of the January 22, 2013hearing. Accordingly, w e GRANT appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file a brief.

Appellant shall file his brief on or before August 16, 2013. We caution appellant that no further extension of time will be granted in this accelerated appeal absent extraordinary circumstances.
/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
www.gpo.gov

### §450e–1. Grant and cooperative agreements

The provisions of this subchapter shall not be subject to the requirements of chapter 63 of title 31: *Provided*, That a grant agreement or a cooperative agreement may be utilized in lieu of a contract under sections 450f and 450g 1 of this title when mutually agreed to by the appropriate Secretary and the tribal organization involved.

(Pub. L. 93–638, §9, as added Pub. L. 98–250, §1, Apr. 3, 1984, 98 Stat. 118; amended Pub. L. 101–301, §2(a)(5), May 24, 1990, 104 Stat. 206.)

#### References in Text

Section 450g of this title, referred to in text, was in the original “section 103 of this Act”, meaning section 103 of Pub. L. 93–638, the Indian Self-Determination Act. Section 103(a) and (b) and the first sentence of section 103(c) of Pub. L. 93–638, were repealed, and the remainder of section 103(c) of Pub. L. 93–638, was redesignated as section 102(d) of Pub. L. 93–638 (section 450f(d) of this title), by Pub. L. 100–472, title II, §201(b)(1), Oct. 5, 1988, 102 Stat. 2289. Section 104 of Pub. L. 93–638 was renumbered as section 103 of Pub. L. 93–638 by section 202(a) of Pub. L. 100–472, and is classified to section 450h of this title.

#### Amendments

1990—Pub. L. 101–301 substituted “chapter 63 of title 31” for “the Federal Grant and Cooperative Agreement Act of 1977 (Pub. L. 95–224; 92 Stat. 3)”.

#### Section Referred to in Other Sections

This section is referred to in section 450b of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.
(logo) C-III | C-IIIAsset Management 

 

 

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

**C-III Asset Management LLC**

 

 

The undersigned, Barry Davis,President of C-III Asset Management LLC (*f/k/a Centerline Servicing LLC*),the Special Servicer under that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement datedas of December 1, 2016, relating to the **Wells Fargo Commercial MortgageTrust 2016-LC25, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-LC25**(the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”), hereby certifies as follows:

 

1.       a review of the activities of the Special Servicer andof its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement during a portionof the preceding calendar year 2018 (July 19,2018 – December 31, 2018) (the“Reporting Period”) has been made under the undersigned’s supervision;

 

2.       to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based onsuch review, the Special Servicer maintained an effective internal controlsystem relating to its servicing of the Mortgage Loans serviced by it and hasfulfilled in all material respects its obligations under the Pooling andServicing Agreement throughout the Reporting Period.

 

Capitalized terms nototherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given them in the Pooling andServicing Agreement.

 

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, as of the 1st day of March, 2019, I havehereuntosigned my name.

 

 

/s/ Barry Davis

**Barry Davis**, President

C-III Asset Management LLC, a

Delaware limited liabilitycompany 

 

 

WFCM 2016-LC25
#### § 1022.310 Reports of transactions in currency.

The reports of transactions in currency requirements for money services businesses are located in subpart C of part 1010 of this chapter and this subpart.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 160 (Monday, August 19, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 50373]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-20226]

========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 160 / Monday, August 19, 2013 / 
Notices

[[Page 50373]]

BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS

Sunshine Act Meeting

DATE AND TIME: Wednesday, August 21, 2013, 8:30 a.m. EDT.

PLACE: Cohen Building, Room 3321, 330 Independence Ave. SW., 
Washington, DC 20237.

SUBJECT: Notice of Meeting of the Broadcasting Board of Governors.
SUMMARY: The Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) will be meeting at 
the time and location listed above. The BBG will consider the minutes 
of Board meetings from December 2012 to June 2013, a resolution to 
change meeting dates for the remaining calendar year, and resolutions 
honoring former members for their service on the Board.
    The public may attend this meeting in person at the address listed 
above as seating capacity permits. Member of the public seeking to 
attend the meeting in person must register at http://bbgboardmeetingaugust2013.eventbrite.com by 12:00 p.m. (EDT) on August 
20. For more information, please contact BBG Public Affairs at (202) 
203-4400 or by email at pubaff@bbg.gov. This meeting will also be 
available for public observation via streamed webcast, both live and 
on-demand, on the BBG's public Web site at www.bbg.gov. Information 
regarding this meeting, including any updates or adjustments to its 
starting time, can also be found on the Agency's public Web site.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Persons interested in obtaining 
more information should contact Paul Kollmer-Dorsey at (202) 203-4545.

Paul Kollmer-Dorsey,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2013-20226 Filed 8-15-13; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8610-01-P
```
#### Marzili v. Marzili

*Duffy, McTighe & McElhome,*for plaintiff.

*S. B. Cooper,*for Master.

*556November 10, 1953.

Knight, P. J.,

In this contested divorce case the master held 10 hearings at which 528 pages of testimony were taken.

The master filed his report recommending that the complaint be dismissed and a divorce refused for lack of jurisdiction in this court because plaintiff had not been a bona fide resident for at least one year in this Commonwealth before filing his complaint.

Exceptions were filed by plaintiff, which were subsequently withdrawn.

The master has received the usual fee of $100 and now asks additional compensation in the sum of $400.

In fixing additional compensation for the master, two facts must be taken into consideration: (1) The amount of time, learning and labor expended by the master in the case; (2) the ability of the person called upon to pay to comply with the order.

As to factor number one, there is no doubt that the master has well earned the additional compensation he requests.

As to factor number two, the answer to the petition for additional compensation sets forth that while employed, plaintiff earned $3,092.40 per annum net, but since January 2,1953, he has been in business for himself on a purely commission basis from which he has received to September 1, 1953, $2,864.42, from which must be deducted expenses of approximately $200 per month, or $1,600.

For our present purpose we must assume that these figures are true and correct.

Under these circumstances, we are all of the opinion that the additional compensation of the master should be $250.

And now, November 10,1953, the rule to show cause why additional compensation should not be awarded the master is made absolute and the additional compensation is fixed at $250.
#### § 19.920 Civil judgment.

*Civil judgment* means the disposition of a civil action by any court of competent jurisdiction, whether by verdict, decision, settlement, stipulation, other disposition which creates a civil liability for the complained of wrongful acts, or a final determination of liability under the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1988 (31 U.S.C. 3801-3812).
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

,

Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 5, 2017

t1212 

# Order

Clerk January 5, 2017

154169

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 154169

COA: 325895

Wayne CC: 14

- 006314

- FH

MARCUS HIGHTOWER, a/k/a MARCUS

ORLANDO HIGHTOWER, a/k/a MARCUS

O LAND O HIGHTOWER,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 21, 2016

judgment of t he Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.