alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463 as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Site Visit review of the Partnership for Research and Education in Materials (PREM) at Jackson State University, Jackson MS (DMR) #1203.                    

*Dates & Times:*                         Monday, March 9, 2009; 7:45 a.m.-9 p.m.; Tuesday, March 10, 2009; 8 a.m.-3:30 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         Jackson State University, Jackson MS.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Part-open.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. William Brittain, Program Director, Materials Research Science and Engineering Centers Program, Division of Materials Research, Room 1065, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone (703) 292-5039.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning further support of the Partnership for Research and Education in Materials (PREM) at Jackson State University, Jackson MS.                    

*Agenda:*

## Monday, March 9, 2009

7:45 a.m.-9 a.m. Closed—Executive Session

9 a.m.-4 p.m. Open—Review of the Jackson State PREM

4 p.m.-6 p.m. Closed—Executive Session

6 p.m.-9 p.m. Open—Poster Session and Dinner

## Tuesday, March 10, 2009

8 a.m.-9 a.m. Closed—Executive Session

9 a.m.-10 a.m. Open—Review of the Brown MRSEC

10 a.m.-3:30 p.m. Closed—Executive Session, Draft and Review Report

*Reason For Closing:*                         The work being reviewed may include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552 b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: January 27, 2009.

Susanne Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

 [FR Doc. E9-1997 Filed 1-29-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1240 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1240

 To combat crime by enhancing the penalties for certain sexual crimes 
                           against children.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 15, 1995

 Mr. McCollum (for himself, Mrs. Vucanovich, Mr. Coble, Mr. Bryant of 
    Tennessee, Mr. Schiff, Mr. Heineman, Mr. Chabot, and Mr. Barr) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To combat crime by enhancing the penalties for certain sexual crimes 
                           against children.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Sexual Crimes Against Children 
Prevention Act of 1995''.

SEC. 2. INCREASED PENALTIES FOR CERTAIN CONDUCT IN SEXUAL EXPLOITATION 
              OF CHILDREN.

    The United States Sentencing Commission shall amend the sentencing 
guidelines to increase the base offense level for offenses under 
section 2251 or 2252 by at least 2 levels.

SEC. 3. INCREASED PENALTIES FOR USE OF COMPUTERS IN SEXUAL EXPLOITATION 
              OF CHILDREN.

    The United States Sentencing Commission shall amend the sentencing 
guidelines with respect to an offense under--
            (1) section 2251(c)(1)(A); or
            (2) any of paragraphs (1) through (3) of section 2252(a);
of title 18, United States Code, to increase the offense level by at 
least 2 levels if a computer was used to transmit the notice or 
advertisement to the intended recipient or to transport or ship the 
visual depiction.

SEC. 4. INCREASED PENALTIES FOR TRANSPORTATION OF CHILDREN WITH INTENT 
              TO ENGAGE IN CRIMINAL SEXUAL ACTIVITY.

    The United States Sentencing Commission shall amend the sentencing 
guidelines to increase the base offense level for an offense under 
section 2423(a) by at least 3 levels.

SEC. 5. PREDICATE OFFENSES FOR RICO.

    Section 1961(1)(B) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``sections 1461-1465 (relating to obscene matter)'' and 
inserting ``chapter 71 (relating to obscenity)''.

SEC. 6. TECHNICAL CORRECTION.

    Section 2423(b) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``2245'' and inserting ``2246''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1023.100 Definitions. Refer to § 1010.100 of this chapter for general definitions not noted herein. To the extent there is a differing definition in § 1010.100 of this chapter, the definition in this section is what applies to part 1023. Unless otherwise indicated, for purposes of this part: ( a ) *Account.* For purposes of § 1023.220: ( 1 ) Account means a formal relationship with a broker-dealer established to effect transactions in securities, including, but not limited to, the purchase or sale of securities and securities loaned and borrowed activity, and to hold securities or other assets for safekeeping or as collateral.
( 2 ) *Account* does not include: ( i ) An account that the broker-dealer acquires through any acquisition, merger, purchase of assets, or assumption of liabilities; or
( ii ) An account opened for the purpose of participating in an employee benefit plan established under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.
( b ) *Broker-dealer* means a person registered or required to be registered as a broker or dealer with the Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 77a *et seq.*), except persons who register pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 78o(b)(11).
( c ) *Commission* means, for the purposes of § 1023.220, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
( d ) *Customer.* For purposes of § 1023.220: ( 1 ) *Customer* means: ( i ) A person that opens a new account; and
( ii ) An individual who opens a new account for: ( A ) An individual who lacks legal capacity; or
( B ) An entity that is not a legal person.
( 2 ) *Customer* does not include: ( i ) A financial institution regulated by a Federal functional regulator or a bank regulated by a state bank regulator;
( ii ) A person described in § 1020.315(b)(2) through (4) of this Chapter; or
( iii ) A person that has an existing account with the broker-dealer, provided the broker-dealer has a reasonable belief that it knows the true identity of the person.
( e ) *Financial institution* is defined at 31 U.S.C. 5312(a)(2) and (c)(1).
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jermaine Smith, Appellant.

[804 NYS2d 774]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme *417Court, Kings County (Kreindler, J.), rendered February 26, 2003, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt is only partially preserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Gray,*86 NY2d 10 [1995]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

The defendant’s claim that the jury’s verdict was repugnant is unpreserved for appellate review (CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Alfaro,*66 NY2d 985 [1985]). In any event, the verdict was not repugnant since the acquittal on the counts of attempted murder in the second degree and assault in the first degree did not negate any of the elements of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree *(see People v Gatling,*222 AD2d 606 [1995]). Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Krausman and Covello, JJ., concur.
#### § 19.600 How do suspension and debarment actions start?

When we receive information from any source concerning a cause for suspension or debarment, we will promptly report and investigate it. We refer the question of whether to suspend or debar you to our suspending or debarring official for consideration, if appropriate.
EXHIBIT 32.2

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                               BIRCH BRANCH, INC.
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Birch Branch, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
Lazzeri, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Robert Lazzeri
------------------
Robert Lazzeri
Chief Financial Officer
May 31, 2007
§ 19.610 What procedures does the Department of the Treasury use in suspension and debarment actions? In deciding whether to suspend or debar you, we handle the actions as informally as practicable, consistent with principles of fundamental fairness. ( a ) For suspension actions, we use the procedures in this subpart and subpart G of this part.
( b ) For debarment actions, we use the procedures in this subpart and subpart H of this part.
March 30, 2011

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Incorporation by Reference of Previous Utility Rulemaking Dockets in the Toxics Rule Docket, EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234

FROM: William H. Maxwell OAQPS/SPPD/ESG

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234

The following dockets are incorporated by referen ce into the subject curre nt rulemaking docket:

 Docket Number A-92-55; Electric Utili ty Hazardous Air Pollutant Emission Study

 E-Docket Number OAR-2002-0056 a nd Docket Numb er EPA-HQ-OAR2002-0056; Revision of December 2000 Clean Air Act Section 112(n) Finding Regarding Electric Utility Steam Gene rating Units (“Section 112(n) Revision Rule”); and Standards of Performance for New and Existing Electric Utility Steam Generating Units (“Cl ean Air Mercury Rule”)
HomeAssisted Schools...Paris, France: American School of Paris: 2024 Special Needs Profile

# 									Paris, France: American School of Paris: 2024 Special Needs Profile							

Special Needs Profile

Office of Overseas Schools

February 13, 2024

## 								School Contact Information							

        -  Tel: +33-1-41-12-82-82 | Regional Education Officer: Tim Stuart 
        -  E-mail: admissions@asparis.fr | Website: www.asparis.org| Special needs information can be found at www.asparis.org/academics/support. 
        -  Additional details on special needs support at post found on the **School Summary Information Portal**(must have OKTA login to access).  For more information, contact A/OPR/OS (**overseasschools@state.gov** / +1-202-261-8200), MED/CFP Child and Family Program Team (**MEDCFP@state.gov**/ +1-202-663-1815), or the school directly.    

**Download the Special Needs Profile** (Paris- 2024 Special Needs Profile- France) for this school to learn more about their capability to support students with exceptionalities.

The **American School of Paris**is an independent, coeducational day school, which offers an educational program from an early childhood three-year-old class through grade 12 for students of all nationalities. The school was founded in 1946 and was the first of its kind in Europe. The school year, extending from late August to mid-June, is comprised of two semesters.

*This is intended to provide general information. Prospective users of the schools may wish to inquire further of A/OPR/OS or contact the school directly for more specific and up-to-the-minute information. Information and statistics are current as of December 2023 and provided by the school.*

NOTE: School situations can change quickly, particularly as schools face cutbacks to learning support programs due to the pandemic, unrest, and economic uncertainty. For the most current information, work with the REO and school. Information in this document was collected by the Department of State’s Office of Overseas Schools directly from the school in December 2023 and shows the availability of services rather than an assessment of the quality of the services. The profile is intended as a jumping off point for a conversation with the REO and school to understand the best fit for your child. Definitions may vary school to school.

Tags

FranceOffice of Overseas Schools

Back to Top
Motion Denied; Order filed April 23 , 2015.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00893

- CR NO. 14

- 14

- 0089 4

- CR

____________ CHARLES EDWARD BELL, Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 182nd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . 1412841 & 1413580



### ORDER

Appellant is represented by appointed counsel, Patricia Sedita . Appellant ’ s brief was originally due January 5, 2015

. We granted a total of 90 days extension of time to file appellant ’ s brief until April 6, 2015. When we granted the last extension, we noted that no further extensions would be granted absent exceptional
circumstances. No brief was filed. O n April 17, 2015 , counsel filed a furtherrequest for extension of time to file appellant ’ s brief. Counsel did not allege any

exceptional circumstances in the request.
We deny the request for extension and issue the following order.
Accordingly, we order Patricia Sedita to file a brief with the clerk of this

c ourt on or before May 5, 2015 . If counsel does not timely file appellant’s brief as ordered, the c ourt will issue an order abating the appeal and directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to dete rmine the reason for the failure to file the brief and the consideration of sanctions, appointment of new counsel, or other appropriate relief.

PER CURIAM
February 27, 1998

Mr. Jim Hendrickson
6266 Braidwood Run
Acworth, Georgia 30101
Tel: 770-424-5739

Dear Jim:

WorldPort is pleased to provide you with the following offer to become its Vice
President of Technology and Strategic Planning.  We look forward to your
positive response to this offer and we look forward to having you as a member of
the WorldPort team!

Terms of Employment:

Title:              Vice President of Technology & Strategic Planning

Reporting:          You will report to the President and Chief Operating
                    Officer.

Responsibilities:   You will be responsible for all aspect s of the Company s
                    corporate technology strategy, product development, office
                    automation and administrative systems, technology platforms,
                    business plan development, security and fraud control,
                    project planning, and project implementation.

Compensation:       Base Salary:                   $125,000

                    Signing Bonus:                  $25,000
                       $12,500 to be paid on your Start Date.
                       $12,500 to be paid within 90 days of the Start Date.

                    Semi-Annual Performance Bonus:          50% of Base Salary
                       Based on objectives to be agreed to
                       by Dan Wickersham and the Board of Directors.
                       Such objectives will be established within
                       90 days of the Start Date.


                    Five Year Options to purchase:           150,000 shares

                       Options to purchase 150,000 shares of Stock
                       will vest and be issued 1/3, 1/3, 1/3 on the
                       first, second and third anniversary of the Start Date
                       at a strike price equal to $3.50 per share.

                       Upon a change of control of the Company, all options 
                    shall vest                 immediately.

Benefits:           You will receive a full health benefits package
                    of the same type held by all WorldPort executives.

Start Date:         March 9, 1998.

Termination:        In the event that you are terminated without cause, you
                    shall receive a severance payment equal to 50% of your
                    annual salary.

Jim, if you are in agreement with these terms, please place your signature in
the space provided below, and fax this letter back to me.  We look forward to
working with you.

                         Sincerely,



                         Paul A. Moore
                         Chief Executive Officer

I hereby accept the above employment terms:


___________________________________          Date:  __________________
Jim Hendrickson
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2015-8467 Directorate Identifier: 2014-NM-107-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Modification 20 $1,700.0

0

$140 $1,840.00 5 $9,200.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $9,200

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
# L_2019085EN.01001601.xml

| 27.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 85/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 85/16

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2019/507

of 26 March 2019

amending for the 297th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida organisations

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 of 27 May 2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida organisations (1), and in particular Article 7(1)(a) and Article 7a(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 lists the persons, groups and entities covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources under that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 lists the persons, groups and entities covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources under that Regulation.

| (2) | On 22 March 2019, the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council decided to add one entry to the list of persons, groups and entities to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply. Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 should therefore be amended accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 22 March 2019, the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council decided to add one entry to the list of persons, groups and entities to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply. Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 should therefore be amended accordingly.

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 March 2019.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Head of the Service for Foreign Policy Instruments

---

(1)  
  OJ L 139 29.5.2002, p. 9.

1

---

ANNEX

In Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 the following entry is added under the heading ‘Legal persons, groups and entities’:

‘Tariq Gidar Group (TGG) (alias: (a) Tehrik-e-Taliban-Tariq Gidar Group (b) TTP-Tariq Gidar Group (c) Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan Geedar Group (d) TTP Geedar Group (e) Tariq Geedar Group (f) Commander Tariq Afridi Group (g) Tariq Afridi Group (h) Tariq Gidar Afridi Group (i) The Asian Tigers. Address: (Afghanistan/Pakistan border region). Other information: Splinter group of Tehrik-e Taliban Pakistan (TTP). The group was formed in Darra Adam Khel, Federally Administered Tribal Area (FATA), Pakistan, in 2007. Date of designation referred to in Article 7d(2)(i): 22.3.2019.’

---