alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 2

Expressing the sense of the Congress that retirement benefits for Members

of Congress should not be subject to cost-of-living adjustments.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. COBLE submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight and, in addition,

to the Committee on House Oversight, for a period to be subsequently

determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that retirement benefits

for Members of Congress should not be subject to costof-living adjustments.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that re3 tirement benefits should not, to the extent that they are

4 based on the service of an individual as a Member of Con5 gress, be subject to cost-of-living adjustments.

Æ
## Max observed concentrations (regulatory monitors only)

Max 1- hour Max 1-

hour Max 1-

hour Max 1-

hourMax 24-

hourMax 24-

hourMax 24-

hourMax 24-

hour Max Annual
mean Max Annual
mean Max Annual
mean Max Annual
meanMax 1-hourMax 1-hourMax 1-hourMax 1-hour

2011 2012 2013 2014 2011 2012 2013 2014* 2011 2012 2013 2014* 2011 2012 2013 2014*
Washoe 7.6 6.9 8 6.9 3.1 2.2 4.4 2.7 0.52 0.39 0.51 .38* 0.86 0.94 0.83 0.81

Clark 8.7 9.1 9.1 7.2 5 5.3 5 4.1 1.22 1.35 1.53 1.42* 0.108 0.105 0.092 0.091

NDEP n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.094 0.099 0.083 0.079

* 2014 data is preliminary and only represents data submitted as of 9/24/2014



## Max site locations

Max 1- hour Max 1-

hour Max 1-

hour Max 1-

hourMax 24-

hourMax 24-

hourMax 24-

hourMax 24-

hour Max Annual
mean Max Annual
mean Max Annual
mean Max Annual
meanMax 1-hourMax 1-hourMax 1-hourMax 1-hour

2011 2012 2013 2014 2011 2012 2013 2014* 2011 2012 2013 2014* 2011 2012 2013 2014*

Washoe Reno3

32-031- 0016 Reno3 32-031- 0016 Reno3 32-031- 0016 Reno3 32-031- 0016 Reno3 32-031- 0016 Reno3 32-031- 0016 Reno3 32-031- 0016 Reno3 32-031- 0016 Reno3 32-031- 0016 Reno3 32-031- 0016 Reno3 32-031- 0016 Reno3 32-031- 0016 Sparks

32-031- 1005 South Reno

32-031- 0020 Toll Road

32-031- 0025 Reno3

32-031- 0016

Clark Jerome

Mack 32-003- 0540 Jerome

Mack 32-003- 0540 Jerome

Mack 32-003- 0540 Jerome

Mack 32-003- 0540 Jerome

Mack 32-003- 0540 Jerome

Mack 32-003- 0540 Jerome

Mack 32-003- 0540 Jerome

Mack 32-003- 0540 Jerome

Mack 32-003- 0540 Jerome

Mack 32-003- 0540 Jerome

Mack 32-003- 0540 Jerome

Mack 32-003- 0540 Walter

Johnson 32-003- 0071 Joe Neal

32-003- 0075 Walter

Johnson 32-003- 0071 Joe Neal

32-003- 0075

NDEP none none none none none none none none none none none none Fernley 32-019- 0006 Great Basin

NP 32-033- 0101 Great Basin

NP 32-033- 0101 Fernley

32-019- 0006 O3 (ppm) SO2 (ppb)

SO2 (ppb) O3 (ppm)
EXHIBIT 31.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Michael Schumacher, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Birch Branch, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date.

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  November 21, 2005


/s/ Michael Schumacher
-----------------------------------------------
Michael Schumacher
President, Treasurer, Chief Executive Officer,
 Chief Financial Officer and Director
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2021158DE.01002301.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 6.5.2021 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 158/23 |

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) 2019/1149 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 20. Juni 2019 zur Errichtung einer Europäischen Arbeitsbehörde und zur Änderung der Verordnungen (EG) Nr. 883/2004, (EU) Nr. 492/2011 und (EU) 2016/589 sowie zur Aufhebung des Beschlusses (EU) 2016/344

(
[Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 186 vom 11. Juli 2019](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2019_186_R_TOC)
)

Seite 36, Artikel 13 Absatz 5, Satz 2

Anstatt:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „(5) | ...Sachverständige der Kommission können in beratender Funktion an dieser zweiten Phase der Mediation teilnehmen.“ |

muss es heißen:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „(5) | ... Sachverständige der Kommission und der Behörde können in beratender Funktion an dieser zweiten Phase der Mediation teilnehmen.“ |

---
#### § 1028.330 Reports relating to currency in excess of $10,000 received in a trade or business.

Refer to § 1010.330 of this Chapter for rules regarding the filing of reports relating to currency in excess of $10,000 received by operators of credit card systems.
Amendment to Trust Agreement Establishing the Deferred Compensation Plans Trust



 EXHIBIT 10.12 
 AMENDMENT TO THE TRUST AGREEMENT 
 Establishing the 
 ZIONS BANCORPORATION DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLANS TRUST 
 WHEREAS, the Zions Bancorporation Deferred Compensation Plans Trust (hereinafter called the “Trust”) was established by and between Zions Bancorporation (hereinafter called the “Employer”), and Prudential
Bank & Trust, FSB, a federal savings bank with its principal office and place of business in the City of Hartford, Connecticut; in connection with and as part of the Zions Bancorporation Deferred Compensation Plans (hereinafter called the
“Plan”); and 
 WHEREAS, effective September 1, 2006, the Employer wishes to amend the Schedule of Covered Plans (Exhibit A of the Trust
Agreement) to remove plans held under the trust; 
 NOW THEREFORE, the Trust Agreement is hereby amended effective September 1, 2006 as follows:

  

	 	1.	The Schedule of Covered Plans (Exhibit A of the Trust Agreement) is deleted in its entirety and replaced by the updated Schedule of Covered Plans attached hereto and forms a part
hereof. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment has been executed on the dates indicated below. 
  

									
	EMPLOYER	 		 	PRUDENTIAL BANK & TRUST, FSB
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Diana M. Anderson
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Andrew Levesque

	Its:	 	SVP, Director fo Corp. Benefits	 		 	Its:	 	Trust Officer
	Date:	 	2/15/2007	 		 	Date:	 	2/16/2007








 EXHIBIT A 
 SCHEDULE OF COVERED PLANS 
  

	 	1.	Zions Bancorporation Excess Benefit Plan 

  

	 	2.	Zions Bancorporation Post 2004 Excess Benefit Plan
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1170 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1170

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To provide that an application for an injunction restraining the 
    enforcement, operation, or execution of a State law adopted by 
referendum may not be granted on the ground of the unconstitutionality 
of such law unless the application is heard and determined by a 3-judge 
                                 court.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1170

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To provide that an application for an injunction restraining the 
    enforcement, operation, or execution of a State law adopted by 
referendum may not be granted on the ground of the unconstitutionality 
of such law unless the application is heard and determined by a 3-judge 
                                 court.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 3-JUDGE COURT FOR CERTAIN INJUNCTIONS.

    Any application for an interlocutory or permanent injunction 
restraining the enforcement, operation, or execution of a State law 
adopted by referendum shall not be granted by a United States district 
court or judge thereof upon the ground of the unconstitutionality of 
such State law unless the application for the injunction is heard and 
determined by a court of 3 judges in accordance with section 2284 of 
title 28, United States Code. Any appeal of a determination on such 
application shall be to the Supreme Court. In any case to which this 
section applies, the additional judges who will serve on the 3-judge 
court shall be designated under section 2284(b)(1) of title 28, United 
States Code, as soon as practicable, and the court shall expedite the 
consideration of the application for an injunction.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    As used in this Act--
            (1) the term ``State'' means each of the several States and 
        the District of Columbia;
            (2) the term ``State law'' means the constitution of a 
        State, or any statute, ordinance, rule, regulation, or other 
        measure of a State that has the force of law, and any amendment 
        thereto; and
            (3) the term ``referendum'' means the submission to popular 
        vote of a measure passed upon or proposed by a legislative body 
        or by popular initiative.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act applies to any application for an injunction that is filed 
on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
§ 100.7 Treasury's redemption process. ( a ) Lawful holders of mutilated currency may receive a redemption at full value when: ( 1 ) Clearly more than 50% of a note identifiable as United States currency is present along with sufficient remnants of any relevant security feature; or
( 2 ) Fifty percent or less of a note identifiable as United States currency is present and the method of mutilation and supporting evidence demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Treasury that the missing portions have been totally destroyed.
( b ) No redemption will be made when: ( 1 ) A submission, or any portion thereof, demonstrates a pattern of intentional mutilation or an attempt to defraud the United States. In such instances, the entire submission will be destroyed or retained as evidence.
( 2 ) A submission appears to be part of, or intended to further, any criminal scheme. In such instances, the entire submission will be destroyed or retained as evidence.
( 3 ) A submission contains a material misrepresentation of facts.
( 4 ) Fragments and remnants presented are not identifiable as United States currency; or
( 5 ) Fragments and remnants presented which represent 50% or less of a note are identifiable as United States currency but the method of destruction and supporting evidence do not satisfy the Treasury that the missing portion has been totally destroyed.
( c ) Lawfully held mutilated currency in a submission that also contains counterfeit currency may be destroyed or retained as evidence, at the discretion of the Director of the Bureau of Engraving and Printing.
( d ) All cases will be handled under proper procedures to safeguard the funds and interests of the submitter of lawfully held mutilated currency. In some cases, the amount redeemed will be less than the amount estimated by the submitter. In other cases, the amount redeemed may be greater. The amount redeemed will be determined by an examination made by trained mutilated currency examiners and governed by the above criteria.
( e ) The Director of the Bureau of Engraving and Printing shall have final authority with respect to redemptions of mutilated currency submissions.
( f ) All submissions for review shall include an estimate of the value of the currency and an explanation of how it came to be mutilated. The submission should also contain the bank account number and routing number for an account of a United States bank since all redemptions of $500 or more shall be made through Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT).
U. S. Department of Homeland Security

 Office for Domestic Preparedness

 Washington, D.C. 20531

ODP Information Bulletin

No. 97 January 23, 2004

TO: All State Administrative Agency Heads

All State Administrative Agency Points of Contact

All State Homeland Security Directors

FROM: C. Suzanne Mencer

Director

SUBJECT: Cost Incurred During High (ORANGE) Threat Levels

The Department of Homeland Security recognizes the significant financial impact that periods of

High (ORANGE) threat levels have had on state and local governments and is engaged in an

ongoing effort to assess this financial burden. It is imperative that we have input from our state

and local partners in order to accurately determine these costs. Consequently, we are requesting

a report of actual expenses that were incurred by your state agencies and local jurisdictions for

critical infrastructure protection during the latest Orange level period, which began on December

21, 2003 and ended on January 9, 2004. For those jurisdictions that were requested to maintain

additional protective measures at specified infrastructures beyond January 9th, separate guidance

will be provided for reimbursing these expenses at a future date.

Attached is a sample template for reporting actual costs incurred at specific site locations within

your state. This completed template, with site location, amount, and category noted, will serve

as the detailed budget worksheet for the expenditure of critical infrastructure protection funds

within the State Homeland Security Grant Program (SHSGP) – Part II and operational costs as

defined in the Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI) – Part II. As indicated in the grant

guidance, states should consider sites identified by the Information Analysis and Infrastructure

Protection (IAIP) Directorate within DHS, as well as additional sites that if attacked, would

result in catastrophic loss of life and/or catastrophic economic loss. Attached to this bulletin is

additional site eligibility information.

Please submit the requested information via email to ruth.carradice@dhs.gov no later than

February 23, 2004. Questions regarding this report may be addressed to your ODP program

manager.

Thank you for your continued efforts and cooperation.
# CI2020432EN.01000101.xml

| 14.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 432/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 432/1

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 11 December 2020

appointing members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Freedom of Movement for Workers for Cyprus

(2020/C 432 I/01)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement for workers within the Union (1), and in particular Articles 23 and 24 thereof,

Having regard to the lists of candidates submitted to the Council by the Governments of the Member States,

Whereas:

| (1) | By its Decision of 21 September 2020 (2), the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Freedom of Movement for Workers for the period from 25 September 2020 to 24 September 2022. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By its Decision of 21 September 2020 (2), the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Freedom of Movement for Workers for the period from 25 September 2020 to 24 September 2022.

| (2) | The Government of Cyprus has submitted nominations for several posts to be filled, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Government of Cyprus has submitted nominations for several posts to be filled,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following are hereby appointed members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Freedom of Movement for Workers for the period ending on 24 September 2022:

| I. | GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES







  Country | Members | Alternate members |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Cyprus | Mr Prodromos CHRYSANTHOU
  Ms Alexia TSAOUSI | Ms Yolanda IOANNIDOU |

I.

GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES

Country

Members

Alternate members

Cyprus

Mr Prodromos CHRYSANTHOU

Ms Alexia TSAOUSI

Ms Yolanda IOANNIDOU

| II. | TRADE UNION REPRESENTATIVES







  Country | Members | Alternate members |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Cyprus | Mr Christos KARYDIS
  Ms Marina STAVRINOU | Mr Stelios CHRISTODOULOU |

II.

TRADE UNION REPRESENTATIVES

Country

Members

Alternate members

Cyprus

Mr Christos KARYDIS

Ms Marina STAVRINOU

Mr Stelios CHRISTODOULOU

| III. | EMPLOYERS' ASSOCIATIONS REPRESENTATIVES







  Country | Members | Alternate members |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Cyprus | Mr Aimilios MICHAEL
  Ms Lena PANAYIOTOU | |

III.

EMPLOYERS' ASSOCIATIONS REPRESENTATIVES

Country

Members

Alternate members

Cyprus

Mr Aimilios MICHAEL

Ms Lena PANAYIOTOU

Article 2

The Council shall appoint the members and alternate members not yet nominated at a later date.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 11 December 2020.

For the Council

The President

M. ROTH

---

(1)  OJ L 141, 27.5.2011, p. 1.

1

(2)  Council Decision of 21 September 2020 appointing the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Freedom of Movement for Workers (OJ C 315 I, 23.9.2020, p. 5)

2

---
- Office
- About Us
- Key Topics
- Programs

HomeScience...About Us

# 									About Us							

Office of Science and Technology Cooperation

Science, technology, and innovation are cornerstones of the American economy. The Office of Science and Technology Cooperation (STC) negotiates and oversees bilateral Science and Technology Agreements worldwide.  These agreements, and their associated expert meetings, strengthen international cooperation in scientific areas aligned with American interests, ensure open data practices, promote reciprocity, extend U.S. norms and principles, and protect American intellectual property.

We recognize that not every country shares American values – in fact, some attempt to illicitly acquire America’s intellectual property and proprietary information. As such, STC works with foreign allies and federally funded scientists to ensure the United States rightfully reaps the benefits of international science and technology cooperation and that those with whom we cooperate adhere to the rules-based order. STC monitors worldwide trends in science and technology to retain U.S. advantages over strategic competitors and improve our understanding of how they may influence—or undermine—American strategies and programs.

We execute public diplomacy programs that highlight American leadership in science and technology and we implement economic programs in emerging markets that connect American businesses with young science and technology entrepreneurs. Our efforts contribute to scientific enterprises that hasten American economic growth and advance American foreign policy priorities. Our ultimate goal is to ensure the United States has access to the best researchers, facilities, and opportunities.

Tags

ScienceTechnology

Back to Top