alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-30169 Conference Calendar

SIDNEY RAIFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus KEVIN BERGERS; Q. TRAN, Dr.; MEDICAL STAFF AVOYELLES CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CV-559
- - - - - - - - - - August 21, 1996 Before KING, DUHÉ, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Sidney Raiford, #268777, appeals from the district court’s dismissal without prejudice of his civil rights complaint for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. Raiford contends that he exhausted his administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and Raiford’s brief and AFFIRM the district court’s judgment for essentially the same reasons adopted by the districtNo. - 2 - court. See Raiford v. Tran et al. , No. CV95-0559-A (W.D. La. Dec. 26, 1995).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                         (1,094)
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      500
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 (594)
<PP&E>                                       4,730,931
<DEPRECIATION>                                 145,151
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,277,199
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          535,863
<BONDS>                                      1,606,837
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,965
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,132,534
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,277,199
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                            1,800
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                97,058
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (98,858)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1326 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1326

To authorize and request the President to award the Congressional Medal 
 of Honor posthumously to Brevet Brigadier General Strong Vincent for 
    his actions in the defense of Little Round Top at the Battle of 
                       Gettysburg, July 2, 1863.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 28, 1995

 Mr. English of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on National Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize and request the President to award the Congressional Medal 
 of Honor posthumously to Brevet Brigadier General Strong Vincent for 
    his actions in the defense of Little Round Top at the Battle of 
                       Gettysburg, July 2, 1863.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
That the President is authorized and requested to award (in accordance 
with award criteria applicable at the time) the Congressional Medal of 
Honor posthumously to Brevet Brigadier General Strong Vincent, of the 
State of Pennsylvania, for his actions in the defense of Little Round 
Top at the Battle of Gettysburg on July 2, 1863. Such an award may be 
made under without regard to the provisons of section 3744 of title 10, 
United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
§ 31.3131-1 Recapture of credits. ( a ) *Recapture of erroneously refunded credits.* Any amount of credits for qualified sick leave wages under section 3131(a), including any increase to the amount of the credits under sections 3131(d), 3131(e), and 3133, that are treated as overpayments and refunded or credited to an employer under section 6402(a) or 6413(b) and to which the employer is not entitled, resulting in an erroneous refund to the employer, shall be treated as an underpayment of the taxes imposed under section 3111(b) and so much of the taxes imposed under section 3221(a) as are attributable to the rate in effect under section 3111(b), as applicable, and may be assessed and collected by the Secretary in the same manner as the taxes.
( b ) *Advance credit amounts erroneously refunded.* The determination of any amount of credits erroneously refunded as described in paragraph (a) of this section must take into account any amount of credits advanced to an employer under the process established by the Internal Revenue Service in accordance with section 3131(b)(4)(B) and 3131(g)(6).
( c ) *Third party payors.* For purposes of this section, employers against whom an erroneous refund of the credits under section 3131 (including any increases in those credits under section 3133) can be assessed as an underpayment of the taxes imposed under section 3111(b) and so much of the taxes imposed under section 3221(a) as are attributable to the rate in effect under section 3111(b), as applicable, include persons treated as the employer under sections 3401(d), 3504, and 3511, consistent with their liability for the section 3111(b) or 3221(a) taxes against which the credit applied, and also include those persons' common law employer clients that remain subject to all provisions of law applicable to employers with respect to the payment of wages or compensation, as applicable.
( d ) *Applicability date.* This section applies to all credit refunds under section 3131 (including any increases in those credits under section 3133), advanced or paid on or after September 8, 2021.
[T.D. 9978, 88 FR 48124, July 26, 2023]
§ 31.6109-2 Tax return preparers furnishing identifying numbers for returns or claims for refund. ( a ) *In general.* Each employment tax return or claim for refund of employment tax under chapters 21 through 25 of subtitle C of the Internal Revenue Code prepared by one or more signing tax return preparers must include the identifying number of the preparer required by § 1.6695-1(b) of this chapter to sign the return or claim for refund in the manner stated in § 1.6109-2 of this chapter.
( b ) *Effective/applicability date.* Paragraph (a) of this section is applicable to returns and claims for refund filed after December 31, 2008.
[T.D. 9436, 73 FR 78453, Dec. 22, 2008]
§ 28.510 Recruitment. ( a ) *Nondiscriminatory recruitment and hiring.* A recipient shall not discriminate on the basis of sex in the recruitment and hiring of employees. Where a recipient has been found to be presently discriminating on the basis of sex in the recruitment or hiring of employees, or has been found to have so discriminated in the past, the recipient shall recruit members of the sex so discriminated against so as to overcome the effects of such past or present discrimination.
( b ) *Recruitment patterns.* A recipient shall not recruit primarily or exclusively at entities that furnish as applicants only or predominantly members of one sex if such actions have the effect of discriminating on the basis of sex in violation of §§ 28.500 through 28.550.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 308.5 Reservations.

The Secretary of the Treasury reserves the right to withdraw or amend at any time or from time to time any or all of the provisions of this part.
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Each of the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of SEACOR Marine Holdings Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge and belief, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K /A of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2017 (the “Annual Report”) accompanying this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  This certification is provided solely for purposes of complying with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not intended to be used for any other purpose.


Date:April 11, 2018/s/JOHN GELLERTName:John GellertTitle:President, Chief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer)





Date:April 11, 2018/s/ Jesus LlorcaName:Jesus LlorcaTitle:Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
----

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(2006/C 291/06)

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/

----
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 225.8 Bond official duties and responsibilities. The bond official's duties and responsibilities are as follows: ( a ) Approving the bond secured by Government obligations after determining its sufficiency;
( b ) Verifying ownership of any registered definitive Government obligations given, and ensuring that those Government obligations are properly assigned;
( c ) Approving establishment of a book-entry account for the benefit of the bond official;
( d ) Providing the custodian, when appropriate, with clear and concise instructions;
( e ) Taking all reasonable and appropriate steps to ensure that all procedures or transactions conform with the provisions of this part; and
( f ) Notifying the Secretary of the Treasury, or his designee, upon an obligor's default, and, unless otherwise provided by law, applying any part of the proceeds in excess of the amount required to assure payment of any costs incurred by the United States related to the default to satisfy any claim of the United States against the obligor.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Byron Lawrence AYERS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-50560.

D.C. No. CR-01-00286-MLR-01.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*922Submitted June 7, 2002 *.

Decided June 18, 2002.

Before FERNANDEZ, WARDLAW, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Byron Lawrence Ayers appeals his conviction and sentence for entering a bank with the intent to commit a felony. *See*18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). We reverse.

We agree with Ayers that the district court erred when it refused to allow a half-day continuance so that Ayers’ mental health expert could testify. *See United States v. Zamora-Hemandez,*222 F.3d 1046, 1049 (9th Cir.2000), *cert. denied,*531 U.S. 1200, 121 S.Ct. 1208, 149 L.Ed.2d 122 (2001); *United States v. Flynt,*756 F.2d 1352, 1358-59 (9th Cir.), *amended by*764 F.2d 675 (9th Cir.1985); *see also Smith v. Ford Motor Co.,*215 F.3d 713, 722 (7th Cir.2000). It also erred when it excluded all testimony from witnesses who had seen Ayers’ behavior at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Los Angeles in the weeks following the offense. *See United States v. Ives,*609 F.2d 930, 932-33 (9th Cir.1979). Moreover, it erred when it answered a jury question by stating that there was no evidence of Ayers’ mental capacity for the jury to consider. In fact, his behavior at and after the offense could be considered. *See United States v. McIver,*186 F.3d 1119, 1130 (9th Cir.1999); *United States v. Hartfield,*513 F.2d 254, 260 (9th Cir.1975) *abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Sneezer,*900 F.2d 177 (9th Cir.1990). The concatenation of all of these errors deprived Ayers of his only defense — lack of mental capacity to form the specific intent required for conviction of the offense in question. Thus, reversal of his conviction is required.1*See Thomas v. Hubbard,*273 F.3d 1164, 1179-80 (9th Cir.2001); *United States v. Frederick,*78 F.3d 1370, 1381 (9th Cir.1996).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. Because we overturn the conviction, we do not consider the alleged sentencing errors.
#### § 31.3404-1 Return and payment by governmental employer.

If the United States, or a State, Territory, Puerto Rico, or a political subdivision thereof, or the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of any one or more of the foregoing, is an employer required to deduct and withhold tax under Chapter 24, the return of the amount deducted and withheld as such tax may be made by the officer or employee having control of the payment of the wages or other officer or employee appropriately designated for that purpose. (For provisions relating to the execution and filing of returns, see Subpart G of the regulations in this part.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      11,567,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       2,872,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               397,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 53,931,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      18,826,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        18,379,000
<LOANS>                                    192,556,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,015,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             300,319,000
<DEPOSITS>                                 234,316,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                21,702,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,958,000
<LONG-TERM>                                 18,167,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,153,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             300,319,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              4,049,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,001,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                48,000
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             5,098,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,220,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,777,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,321,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   90,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,402,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                378,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     252,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   252,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.25
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,071,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   411,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              1,980,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,996,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   74,000
<RECOVERIES>                                     3,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,015,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         2,015,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      2,015,000


</TABLE>
§ 44.4901-1 Payment of special tax. ( a ) *Condition precedent to carrying on business.* No persons shall engage in the business of accepting wagers subject to the tax imposed by section 4401 until he has filed a return on Form 11-C and paid the special tax imposed by section 4411. Likewise, no person shall engage in receiving wagers for or on behalf of any person engaged in the business of accepting wagers until he has filed a return on Form 11-C and paid the special tax imposed by section 4411. For provisions relating to the tax imposed by section 4401 and the special tax imposed by section 4411, see Subparts B and C of this part, respectively.
( b ) *Computation of special tax.* ( 1 ) Section 4411 imposes a special tax of $50 per year which is required to be paid by each person who is liable for the tax imposed by section 4401 (tax on wagers) or who is engaged in receiving wagers for or on behalf of any person who is liable for the tax imposed by section 4401. A person engaged both in accepting wagers on his own account and in receiving wagers for or on behalf of some other person is required to purchase but one special tax stamp.
( 2 ) The tax year begins July 1 and ends June 30 of the following calendar year. Persons commencing business between August 1 and June 30 (both dates inclusive) shall pay a proportionate part of the annual tax. “Commencing business” means the initial acceptance by a person of a wager subject to the tax imposed by section 4401 or the initial receiving of a taxable wager by an agent or employee for or on behalf of some other person. Persons in business for only a portion of a month are liable for tax for the full month, i.e., a person first becoming subject to the special tax on, for example, the 20th day of a month, is liable for tax for the entire month.
( c ) *Tax payment evidenced by special tax stamp.* ( 1 ) Upon receipt of a return on Form 11-C, together with remittance of the full amount of tax due, the district director will issue a special tax stamp as evidence of payment of the special tax.
( 2 ) District directors will distinctly write or print on the stamp before it is delivered or mailed to the taxpayer the following information: ( i ) The taxpayer's registered name, and
( ii ) the business or office address of the taxpayer if he has one; if not, the residence address. Special tax stamps will be transmitted by ordinary mail, unless it is requested that they be transmitted by registered mail in which case additional cost to cover registry fee shall be remitted with the return.
( 3 ) District directors and their collection officers are forbidden to issue receipts in lieu of stamps representing the payment of special taxes.
( d ) *Cross references.* For provisions relating to registration and information required to be reported on Form 11-C, see § 44.4412-1. For other provisions relating to Form 11-C, see §§ 44.6011(a)-1 (relating to returns), 44.6071-1 (time for filing returns and other documents), and 44.6091-1 (place for filing returns or other documents).
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1202 KA 11-02400 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

VAN T. CUNG, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (ROBERT L. KEMP OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (DAVID PANEPINTO OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Deborah A. Haendiges, J.), rendered September 21, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of criminal contempt in the second degree. It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Same Memorandum as in People v Cung ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Dec. 27, 2013]).

Entered: December 27, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
§ 149.3 Maximum obligation limitation. The FDIC shall not, in connection with the orderly liquidation of a covered financial company, issue or incur any obligation, if, after issuing or incurring the obligation, the aggregate amount of such obligations outstanding for each covered financial company would exceed— ( a ) An amount that is equal to 10 percent of the total consolidated assets of the covered financial company, based on the most recent financial statement available, during the 30-day period immediately following the date of appointment of the FDIC as receiver (or a shorter time period if the FDIC has calculated the amount described under paragraph (b) of this section); and
( b ) The amount that is equal to 90 percent of the fair value of the total consolidated assets of each covered financial company that are available for repayment, after the time period described in paragraph (a) of this section.