41936 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 19, 2009 / Notices 

Manpower and Spherion, Janesville, 

WI, May 22, 2008. 

TA–W–70,714; Johnson Controls Interior 

Manufacturing, LLC (McAllenUSA), Automotive Experience, 

McAllen, TX, May 27, 2008. 

TA–W–70,873; Group Dekko, Inc., 

Murray Plant, Leased Workers of 

Grapevine Staffing and Advance 

Services, Murray, IA, May 20, 2008. 

TA–W–70,887; Berryville Graphics, 

Arvato Division, Leased Workers 

From Axion Staffing, Berryville, VA, 

June 2, 2008. 

TA–W–70,914; Gilmour Manufacturing 

Company, Division of Robert Bosch 

Tool, Rugierri Enterprises, etc, 

Somerset, PA, June 1, 2008. 

TA–W–70,970, General Dynamics Itonix 

Corporation, C4 Systems, Spokane 

Valley, WA, May 18, 2008. 

TA–W–71,076; ITT Corporation, FMC– 

Interconnect Solutions, First Choice 

Staffing, Santa Ana, CA, June 8, 

2008. 

TA–W–71,180; Bracalente 

Manufacturing Company, 

Trumbaursville, PA, June 1, 2008. 

TA–W–71,181; Philips Electronics, 

Philips Oral Healthcare, Leased 

Workers from Adecco NA, 

Snoqualmie, WA, June 10, 2008. 

TA–W–70,410; Avnet Grapevine 

Assembly Facility, Leased Workers 

From Kelly Services, Grapevine, TX, 

May 19, 2008. 

TA–W–70,086; EBI Holding, LLC, Health 

Insurance Verification and Billing 

Department, dba Biomet Spine, 

Parsippany, NJ, May 18, 2008. 

TA–W–70,321; Leggett and Platt, Inc., 

Leggett Wood Division Office, 

Wilkes-Barre, PA, May 18, 2008. 

TA–W–70,496; Tektronix, Inc., 

Information Technology Division, 

Data Center Operations Group, 

Beaverton, OR, May 21, 2008. 

TA–W–70,662; Berry Floor USA, Inc., 

Racine, WI, May 27, 2008. 

TA–W–70,506; Ecolab, Inc., Accounts 

Receivable Department, Eagan, MN, 

May 18, 2008. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(b) (adversely affected workers in 

public agencies) of the Trade Act have 

been met. 

None. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers 

are certified eligible to apply for TAA) 

of the Trade Act have been met. 

TA–W–70,029; Chick Machine Co., Inc., 

Butler, PA May 18, 2008. 

TA–W–70,077; Carrick Turning Works, 

Inc., High Point, NC, May 18, 2008. 

TA–W–70,209; AGC Flat Glass North 

America, Inc., Jerry Run Facility, 

Bridgeport, WV, May 18, 2008. 

TA–W–70,411; Tarkio Corporation, dba 

Proco Manufacturing, Beaverton, 

OR, May 19, 2008. 

TA–W–70,528; Allegheny Ludlum 

Corporation, A Division of 

Allegheny Technologies, Midland, 

PA, May 22, 2008. 

TA–W–70,568; Mount Vernon Mills, 

Brentex Division, Williamston 

Plant, Williamston, SC, May 22, 

2008. 

TA–W–70,649; Mount Vernon Mills, 

Curo Plant, Brentex Division, Cuero 

Plant, Cuero, TX, May 22, 2008. 

TA–W–70,902; Tech Molded Plastics, 

LP, Kelly Services, Career Concepts, 

Select Staffing, Meadville, PA, May 

27, 2008. 

TA–W–70,977; Top Notch, Inc., Fort 

Payne, AL, June 2, 2008. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(c) (downstream producer for a firm 

whose workers are certified eligible to 

apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have 

been met. 

TA–W–70,670; PIHT, LLC,: A Subsidiary 

of Bluewater Thermal Processing, 

Saint Marys, PA, May 20, 2008. 

TA–W–70,742; Hanes Dye and Finishing 

Co., A Subsidiary of Leggett and 

Platt, Winston Salem, NC, May 27, 

2008. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(f) (firms identified by the 

International Trade Commission) of the 

Trade Act have been met. 

TA–W–70,702; Wheatland Tube 

Company, Sharon, PA, March 13, 

2009. 

TA–W–71,199; Appleton Papers, Inc., 

Appleton, WI, November 20, 2007. 

Negative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, the 

investigation revealed that the eligibility 

criteria for worker adjustment assistance 

have not been met for the reasons 

specified. 

The investigation revealed that the 

criterion under paragraph (a)(1), or 

(b)(1), or (c)(1) (employment decline or 

threat of separation) of section 222 has 

not been met. 

None. 

The investigation revealed that the 

criteria under paragraphs (a)(2)(A)(i) 

(decline in sales or production, or both) 

and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or 

services to a foreign country) of section 

222 have not been met. 

None. 

The investigation revealed that the 

criteria under paragraphs (a)(2)(A) 

(increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift 

in production or services to a foreign 

country) of section 222 have not been 

met. 

None. 

The investigation revealed that the 

criteria under paragraphs (b)(2) and 

(b)(3) (public agency acquisition of 

services from a foreign country) of 

section 222 have not been met. 

None. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria of Section 222(c)(2) has not been 

met. The workers’ firm (or subdivision) 

is not a Supplier to or a Downstream 

Producer for a firm whose workers were 

certified as eligible to apply for TAA. 

None. 

I hereby certify that the aforementioned 

determinations were issued during the period 

of June 15 through June 26, 2009. Copies of 

these determinations are available for 

inspection in Room N–5428, U.S. Department 

of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20210 during normal 

business hours or will be mailed to persons 

who write to the above address. 

Dated: August 3, 2009. 

Linda G. Poole, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E9–19832 Filed 8–18–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Notice of Determinations Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 

U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor 

herein presents summaries of 

determinations regarding eligibility to 

apply for trade adjustment assistance for 

workers (TA–W) number and alternative 

trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by 

(TA–W) number issued during the 

period of July 20 through July 24, 2009. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for workers of 

a primary firm and a certification issued 

regarding eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of section 222(a) 

of the Act must be met. 

I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must 

be satisfied: 

A. a significant number or proportion of 

the workers in such workers’ firm, or an 

appropriate subdivision of the firm, have 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 19, 2009 / Notices 41937 

become totally or partially separated, or are 

threatened to become totally or partially 

separated; 

B. the sales or production, or both, of such 

firm or subdivision have decreased 

absolutely; and 

C. increased imports of articles like or 

directly competitive with articles produced 

by such firm or subdivision have contributed 

importantly to such workers’ separation or 

threat of separation and to the decline in 

sales or production of such firm or 

subdivision; or 

II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following 

must be satisfied: 

A. a significant number or proportion of 

the workers in such workers’ firm, or an 

appropriate subdivision of the firm, have 

become totally or partially separated, or are 

threatened to become totally or partially 

separated; 

B. there has been a shift in production by 

such workers’ firm or subdivision to a foreign 

country of articles like or directly 

competitive with articles which are produced 

by such firm or subdivision; and 

C. One of the following must be satisfied: 

1. the country to which the workers’ firm 

has shifted production of the articles is a 

party to a free trade agreement with the 

United States; 

2. the country to which the workers’ firm 

has shifted production of the articles to a 

beneficiary country under the Andean Trade 

Preference Act, African Growth and 

Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin 

Economic Recovery Act; or 

3. there has been or is likely to be an 

increase in imports of articles that are like or 

directly competitive with articles which are 

or were produced by such firm or 

subdivision. 

Also, in order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for 

secondarily affected workers of a firm 

and a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of section 222(b) 

of the Act must be met. 

(1) Significant number or proportion of the 

workers in the workers’ firm or an 

appropriate subdivision of the firm have 

become totally or partially separated, or are 

threatened to become totally or partially 

separated; 

(2) the workers’ firm (or subdivision) is a 

supplier or downstream producer to a firm 

(or subdivision) that employed a group of 

workers who received a certification of 

eligibility to apply for trade adjustment 

assistance benefits and such supply or 

production is related to the article that was 

the basis for such certification; and 

(3) either— 

(A) the workers’ firm is a supplier and the 

component parts it supplied for the firm (or 

subdivision) described in paragraph (2) 

accounted for at least 20 percent of the 

production or sales of the workers’ firm; or 

(B) a loss or business by the workers’ firm 

with the firm (or subdivision) described in 

paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the 

workers’ separation or threat of separation. 

In order for the Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance to issue a 

certification of eligibility to apply for 

Alternative Trade Adjustment 

Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, 

the group eligibility requirements of 

section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act 

must be met. 

1. Whether a significant number of 

workers in the workers’ firm are 50 

years of age or older. 

2. Whether the workers in the 

workers’ firm possess skills that are not 

easily transferable. 

3. The competitive conditions within 

the workers’ industry (i.e., conditions 

within the industry are adverse). 

Affirmative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The date following the company 

name and location of each 

determination references the impact 

date for all workers of such 

determination. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of section 

222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the 

Trade Act have been met. 

None. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of section 

222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the 

Trade Act have been met. 

None. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of section 

222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers 

are certified eligible to apply for TAA) 

of the Trade Act have been met. 

None. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of section 

222(b) (downstream producer for a firm 

whose workers are certified eligible to 

apply for TAA based on increased 

imports from or a shift in production to 

Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act 

have been met. 

None. 

Affirmative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The date following the company 

name and location of each 

determination references the impact 

date for all workers of such 

determination. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of section 

222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and 

section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act 

have been met. 

TA–W–65,867; Vanguard Supreme, 

Division of Monarch Knitting 

Machinery Corp., Monroe, NC: April 

28, 2008 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of section 

222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and 

section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act 

have been met. 

None. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of section 

222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers 

are certified eligible to apply for TAA) 

and section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade 

Act have been met. 

None. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of section 

222(b) (downstream producer for a firm 

whose workers are certified eligible to 

apply for TAA based on increased 

imports from or a shift in production to 

Mexico or Canada) and section 

246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have 

been met. 

None. 

Negative Determinations for Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, it has been 

determined that the requirements of 

246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for 

the reasons specified. 

The Department has determined that 

criterion (1) of section 246 has not been 

met. The firm does not have a 

significant number of workers 50 years 

of age or older. 

None. 

The Department has determined that 

criterion (2) of section 246 has not been 

met. Workers at the firm possess skills 

that are easily transferable. 

None. 

The Department has determined that 

criterion (3) of section 246 has not been 

met. Competition conditions within the 

workers’ industry are not adverse. 

None. 

Negative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, the 

investigation revealed that the eligibility 

criteria for worker adjustment assistance 

have not been met for the reasons 

specified. 

Because the workers of the firm are 

not eligible to apply for TAA, the 

workers cannot be certified eligible for 

ATAA. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.) 

(employment decline) have not been 

met. 

None. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
41938 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 19, 2009 / Notices 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or 

production, or both, did not decline) 

and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production 

to a foreign country) have not been met. 

None. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased 

imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in 

production to a foreign country) have 

not been met. 

TA–W–65,758; Paul Mueller Company, 

Osceola, IA 

The workers’ firm does not produce 

an article as required for certification 

under section 222 of the Trade Act of 

1974. 

None. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria of section 222(b)(2) has not been 

met. The workers’ firm (or subdivision) 

is not a supplier to or a downstream 

producer for a firm whose workers were 

certified eligible to apply for TAA. 

None. 

I hereby certify that the aforementioned 

determinations were issued during the period 

of July 20 through July 24, 2009. Copies of 

these determinations are available for 

inspection in Room N–5428, U.S. Department 

of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20210 during normal 

business hours or will be mailed to persons 

who write to the above address. 

Dated: August 3, 2009. 

Linda G. Poole, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E9–19833 Filed 8–18–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Occupational Safety and Health 

Administration 

[Docket No. OSHA–2009–0018] 

Federal Advisory Council on 

Occupational Safety and Health 

(FACOSH) 

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health 

Administration (OSHA), Labor. 

ACTION: Announcement of special 

meeting. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Advisory Council 

on Occupational Safety and Health 

(FACOSH) will hold a special meeting 

on September 15, 2009, in Washington, 

DC, to review a draft report from the 

FACOSH Emerging Issues Workgroup 

on activities related to Federal agency 

pandemic-H1N1 influenza preparedness 

planning for the Federal workforce. 

DATES: FACOSH meeting: FACOSH will 

meet from 1 p.m. to 4:30 p.m., Tuesday, 

September 15, 2009. 

Submission of comments, requests to 

speak, and requests for special 

accommodations: Comments, requests 

to speak at the FACOSH meeting, and 

requests for special accommodations 

must be submitted (postmarked, sent, 

transmitted) by September 8, 2009. 

ADDRESSES: FACOSH meeting: FACOSH 

will meet in Rooms N–4437 B/C/D, U.S. 

Department of Labor, 200 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. 

Submission of comments and requests 

to speak: Comments and requests to 

speak at the FACOSH meeting, 

identified by Docket No. OSHA–2009– 

0018, may be submitted by any of the 

following methods: 

Electronically: You may submit 

materials, including attachments, 

electronically at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, the Federal 

eRulemaking Portal. Follow the online 

instructions for making submissions. 

Facsimile: If your submission, 

including attachments, does not exceed 

10 pages, you may fax it to the OSHA 

Docket Office at (202) 693–1648. 

Mail, express delivery, hand delivery, 

messenger or courier service: You must 

submit three copies of your submissions 

to the OSHA Docket Office, Room N– 

2625, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 

DC 20210; telephone (202) 693–2350 

(TTY (877) 889–5627). Deliveries (hand, 

express mail, messenger and courier 

service) are accepted during the 

Department of Labor’s and OSHA 

Docket Office’s normal business hours, 

8:15 a.m.–4:45 p.m., e.t. 

Requests for special accommodations 

for FACOSH meeting: Submit requests 

for special accommodations by 

telephone, e-mail or hard copy to Ms. 

Veneta Chatmon, OSHA, Office of 

Communications, Room N–3647, U.S. 

Department of Labor, 200 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210; 

telephone (202) 693–1999; e-mail 

chatmon.veneta@dol.gov. 

Instructions: All comments, requests 

to speak, and requests for special 

accommodations must include the 

Agency name and docket number for 

this Federal Register notice (Docket No. 

OSHA–2009–0018). Because of securityrelated procedures, submissions by 

regular mail may result in a significant 

delay in their receipt. Please contact the 

OSHA Docket Office, at the address 

above, for information about security 

procedures for making submissions by 

hand delivery, express delivery, and 

messenger or courier service. For 

additional information on submitting 

comments and requests to speak, see the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

below. 

Comments and requests to speak, 

including any personal information 

provided, will be posted without change 

at http://www.regulations.gov. 

Therefore, OSHA cautions interested 

parties about submitting certain 

personal information such as social 

security numbers and birth dates. 

Docket: To read or download 

submissions in response to this Federal 

Register notice, go to Docket No. 

OSHA–2009–0018 at http:// 

www.regulations.gov or the OSHA 

Docket Office at the address above. All 

documents in the docket are listed in 

the http://www.regulations.gov index. 

Although listed in the index, some 

documents (e.g., copyrighted material) 

are not publicly available to read or 

download through http:// 

www.regulations.gov. All submissions, 

including copyrighted material, are 

available for inspection and copying at 

the OSHA Docket Office. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

For press inquiries: Ms. Jennifer 

Ashley, OSHA, Office of 

Communications, U.S. Department of 

Labor, Room N–3647, 200 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210; 

telephone (202) 693–1999. 

For general information: Mr. Francis 

Yebesi, OSHA, Office of Federal Agency 

Programs, U.S. Department of Labor, 

Room N–3622, 200 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210; 

telephone (202) 693–2122; e-mail 

ofap@dol.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FACOSH 

will hold a special meeting on Tuesday, 

September 15, 2009, in Washington, DC. 

FACOSH meetings are open to the 

public. 

FACOSH is authorized by 5 U.S.C. 

7902, section 19 of the Occupational 

Safety and Health Act of 1970 (OSH 

Act) (29 U.S.C. 668), and Executive 

Order 12196 to advise the Secretary of 

Labor on all matters relating to the 

occupational safety and health of 

Federal employees. This includes 

providing advice on how to reduce and 

keep to a minimum the number of 

injuries and illnesses in the Federal 

workforce and how to encourage each 

Federal Executive Branch Department 

and Agency to establish and maintain 

effective occupational safety and health 

programs. 

The tentative agenda for this special 

FACOSH meeting is consideration of 

and deliberation on a draft report from 

the FACOSH Emerging Issues 

Workgroup on activities related to 

Federal agency pandemic-H1N1 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES