alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Rev 0 (9/08)

Comments in Response to 

“Final rule; request for comments”

Docket: FAA-2012-0037 Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-003-AD

Comments have been received in response to: “Final rule; request for comments,”

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket and Directorate Identifier entered above. 

(Project engineer: Please review any comments to determine if additional action is warranted.

Once you have made your determination, please fill in the commenter(s) name(s) and check the 

appropriate response below. Include additional information following the appropriate response, 

if necessary. Then include your name and the date in the spaces provided, and return it to the 

AD directorate focal.

The FAA has reviewed comment(s) related to the above FAA Docket that we received from: One 

commenter (Anonymous) requested that we revise the AD to address the reporting requirement. 

The service bulletin incorporated by reference, 84-24-52 has a reporting requirement in step (5) 

of accomplishment instructions. B, Porcedures, and the AD does not contain the required 

language for reporting as specificed in manual FAA-IR-M-8040.1C. page 53.

(Please check one)

 These comments have not been found to contain any information to warrant reconsideration 

or change of this AD.

 These comments have been found to contain information that warrants consideration of 

additional regulatory action. (SEE Airworthiness Directives Manual 

FAA-IR-M-8040.1 FOR ADDITIONAL ACTION.)

______Assata Dessaline_____ 04/26/2012__

Name: Date:

(This form is part of the official docket file for this AD action.)
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Appointment of Desirée Cormier Smith as the Special Representative for Racial Equity and Justice

# 									Appointment of Desirée Cormier Smith as the Special Representative for Racial Equity and Justice							

Press Statement

June 17, 2022

This Administration has consistently sought to confront systemic racism and injustice around the world, and, to that end, I have appointed Desirée Cormier Smith as the State Department’s first Special Representative for Racial Equity and Justice. Serving in this role, Special Representative Cormier Smith will lead our efforts to protect and advance the human rights of people belonging to marginalized racial and ethnic communities and combat systemic racism, discrimination, and xenophobia around the world.

The State Department strives to promote and protect the rights of individuals and communities who are oppressed because of their race or ethnicity and create a just world where all people are valued, included, and able to live up to their full potential.  Special Representative Cormier Smith will also ensure that our own policies are protecting and advancing the rights of people belonging to marginalized racial and ethnic communities. Embedding equity across our work is imperative to ensuring better-informed and more effective foreign policies and programs that support all people regardless of their race or ethnicity.

Special Representative Cormier Smith is a recognized racial justice expert with a deep and steadfast commitment to equity and justice for all. Prior to this appointment, she served as the Senior Advisor in the Department’s Bureau of International Organization Affairs along with previous stints in the advocacy and private sectors. Ms. Desirée Cormier Smith began her career as a Foreign Service Officer at the State Department. I am thrilled to welcome her back to the Department in this new and historic role.

Tags

Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborHuman Rights and DemocracyOffice of the Special Representative for Racial Equity and JusticeOffice of the SpokespersonRacial Equity and Justice

Back to Top
dara_104.htm


Exhibit 10.4


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1


TO


DARA BIOSCIENCES, INC. 2008


EMPLOYEE, DIRECTOR AND CONSULTANT STOCK PLAN







Amendment No. 1 (the “Amendment”), dated May 15, 2012, to 2008 Employee, Director and Consultant Stock Plan (the “Existing Plan”; as amended hereby, the “Plan”), of DARA BioSciences, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”).


 


Statement of Purpose







The Plan was approved by the Company’s Board of Directors on December 5, 2007, and by its stockholders on February 12, 2008, and became effective on such date.  The Company wishes to amend the Plan to increase the number of shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $.01, authorized for issuance under the Plan.







NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual agreements contained herein, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:







1.           Capitalized Terms.  All capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings given thereto in the Existing Plan.







2.           Amendment to Existing Plan.  The first paragraph of Section 4.  STOCK SUBJECT TO PLAN is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:







“Subject to adjustment as provided in this Section 4, the aggregate number of shares of Stock which may be delivered under the Plan (the “Maximum Plan Shares”) shall not exceed 1,995,098; provided, however, that, as of January 1 of each calendar year, commencing with the year 2013, the maximum number of shares of Stock which may be delivered under the Plan shall automatically increase by a number sufficient to cause the number of shares of Stock covered by the Plan to equal 15% of the total number of shares of Stock then outstanding, assuming for this purpose the conversion into Stock of all outstanding securities that are convertible by their terms (directly or indirectly) into Stock. The maximum aggregate number of shares of Stock which may be delivered under the Plan to employees in the form of Incentive Stock Options is the lesser of (1) the Maximum Plan Shares and (2) 10,000,000.”







3.           Reference to and Effect on the Plan.  The Plan, as amended hereby, and all other documents, instruments and agreements executed and/or delivered in connection therewith, shall remain in full force and effect, and are hereby ratified and confirmed.







4.           Governing Law.  This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware.







*           *           *







Approved effective May 15, 2012
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 203.10 Electronic payment methods. ( a ) *General.* Electronic payment methods for Federal tax payments available under this subpart include ACH debit entries, ACH credit entries, and same-day payments.
( b ) *Conditions to making an electronic payment.* This part does not affect the authority of financial institutions to enter into contracts with their customers regarding the terms and conditions for processing payments, as long as the terms and conditions of those contracts are not inconsistent with this part and with any laws that apply to the particular transactions.
( c ) *Payment of interest for time value of funds held.* Treasury will not pay interest on any payment that a financial institution erroneously originates and that subsequently is refunded.
EXHIBIT 10.1

 

AMENDMENT TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

THIS AMENDMENT to the employment agreement by and between THE BON-TON STORES, INC., a Pennsylvania corporation (the “Company”), and STEPHEN BYERS (the “Employee”), entered into as of the 1st day of May, 2011 (the “Employment Agreement”), is hereby made for purposes of compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).

 

W  I  T  N  E  S  S  E  T  H:

 

WHEREAS, Employee is currently party to the Employment Agreement; and

 

WHEREAS, the Company and Employee have agreed to modify the Employment Agreement to comply with Code Section 409A, as permitted pursuant to IRS Notice 2010-6 (the “IRS Notice”).

 

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein and intending to be legally bound hereby, the Company and Employee agree as follows:

 

1.              Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Employment Agreement, all payments to be provided upon the Employee’s separation from service, as set forth in Section 8 that are subject to Code Section 409A shall be made in equal installments in accordance with the Company’s regular payroll practices and shall be paid at the time and manner as such payments would have been paid had all payments under Section 8 been paid in such equal installments; provided, however, that any payments that are not exempt under the separation pay exemption from Code Section 409A that would

 











 

otherwise be paid during the six month period following the Employee’s separation from service shall be deferred until the end of such six month period to the extent necessary to avoid a violation of Code Section 409A(a)(2)(B)(i).

 

2.              In all other respects, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect without change.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, have duly executed and delivered, in Wisconsin, this Agreement as of the 20th day of August, 2012.

 

 

	
 
    	
THE   BON-TON STORES, INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/Brendan   L. Hoffman
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Brendan   L. Hoffman
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
President   and Chief Executive Officer
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
EMPLOYEE:
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
/s/Stephen   Byers
    
	
 
    	
Stephen   Byers
    


 

2
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 205.12 What funding techniques may be used? ( a ) We and a State may negotiate the use of mutually agreed upon funding techniques. We may deny interest liability if a State does not use a mutually agreed upon funding technique. Funding techniques should be efficient and minimize the exchange of interest between States and Federal agencies.
( b ) We and a State may base our agreement on the sample funding techniques listed in paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(5) of this section, or any other technique upon which both parties agree. ( 1 ) Zero balance accounting means that a Federal Program Agency transfers the actual amount of Federal funds to a State that are paid out by the State each day.
( 2 ) Projected clearance means that a Federal Program Agency transfers to a State the projected amount of funds that the State pays out each day. The projected amount paid out each day is determined by applying a clearance pattern to the total amount the State will disburse.
( 3 ) Average clearance means that a Federal Program Agency, on the dollar-weighted average day of clearance of a disbursement, transfers to a State a lump sum equal to the actual amount of funds that the State is paying out. The dollar-weighted average day of clearance is the day when, on a cumulative basis, 50 percent of the funds have been paid out. The dollar-weighted average day of clearance is calculated from a clearance pattern, consistent with § 205.20.
( 4 ) Cash advance (pre-issuance or post-issuance) funding means that a Federal Program Agency transfers the actual amount of Federal funds to a State that will be paid out by the State, in a lump sum, not more than three business days prior to the day the State issues checks or initiates EFT payments.
( 5 ) Reimbursable funding means that a Federal Program Agency transfers Federal funds to a State after that State has already paid out the funds for Federal assistance program purposes.
§ 34.802 Certifications. At a minimum, grant applications and agreements for the Direct Component, Comprehensive Plan Component, and Spill Impact Component must contain the following certifications. The certification must be signed by an authorized senior official of the entity receiving grant funds who can legally bind the organization or entity, and who has oversight for the administration and use of the funds in question. The certification in paragraph (c) of this section does not apply to planning assistance funds for the preparation and amendment of the Multiyear Implementation Plan. ( a ) I certify that each activity funded under this Agreement has been designed to plan for or undertake activities to restore and protect the natural resources, ecosystems, fisheries, marine and wildlife habitats, beaches, coastal wetlands, or economy of the Gulf Coast Region.
( b ) I certify that each activity funded under this Agreement is designed to carry out one or more of the eligible activities for this component.
( c ) I certify that each activity funded under this Agreement was part of a plan made available for public review and comment in a manner calculated to obtain broad-based participation from individuals, businesses, Indian tribes, and nonprofit organizations, and that the activity was selected after consideration of meaningful input from the public, as described in the grant application.
( d ) I certify that each activity funded under this Agreement that protects or restores natural resources is based on the best available science, as that term is defined in 31 CFR part 34.
( e ) I certify that this recipient has procedures in place for procuring property and services under this award that are consistent with the procurement standards applying to Federal grants. This recipient agrees that it will not request funds under this award for any contract unless this certification remains true and accurate.
( f ) I certify that a conflict of interest policy is in effect and covering each activity funded under this Agreement.
( g ) I make each of these certifications based on my personal knowledge and belief after reasonable and diligent inquiry, and I affirm that this recipient maintains written documentation sufficient to support each certification made above, and that this recipient's compliance with each of these certifications is a condition of this recipient's initial and continuing receipt and use of the funds provided under this Agreement.
October 1 , 2014

Mr. Paul Gretch

Director

, Office of International Aviation

United States Department of Transportation

12 00 New Jersey Ave. , S. E

. Washington, D.C. 2059 0

Re: American Airlines’ Application for an Exemption and

Frequency Allocation

(Dallas/Ft. Worth, Texas

– Beijing, People’s Republic of China)

Dear Mr. Gretch:

We have polled the air carriers on the attached service list regarding

American Airlines’ A pplication for an Exemption and Allocation of Frequencies

(DFW

- PEK) . We received no objections.

Accordingly, we respectfully request expedited allocation of the Exemption

and Frequencies requested in the Application.

Sincerely,

Howard Kass

Vice Pre sident

– Regulatory Affairs

Robert A. Wirick,

Managing Director, Regulatory and

International Affairs

Abigail Donovan

Director, Congressional and Federal Affairs

11 01 17 th Street NW, Washington, DC 20036 ( 202 ) 326

- 5 15 3 Fax: ( 202 ) 898

- 4810CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that, on O c tober 1 , 2014 , I caused to be serve d a copy of the

foregoing Letter by email upon those addressees listed below:

englets@state.gov (Department of State)

cristinasa@state.gov (Department of State)

paul.gretch@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

brian.hedberg@dot.gov (Department of Trans portation)

todd.homan@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

peter.irvine@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

laura.remo@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

brett.kruger@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

john.allen@faa.gov (Federal Aviation Administration)

dan.weiss@united.com (United)

steve.morrissey@united.com (United)

gmurphy@crowell.com (Counsel for United)

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com (Delta)

chris.walker@delta.com (Delta)

jhill@ cooley .com (Counsel for Hawaiian)

perkmann@ cooley .c om (Counsel for Hawaiian)

______________ ________

Abigail Donovan
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

                                                                      Exhibit 27

                             FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         243,582
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               243,582
<PP&E>                                     108,657,491
<DEPRECIATION>                              36,787,452
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              72,464,719
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       29,419,393
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,219,525
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                72,464,719
<SALES>                                      7,135,542
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,136,542
<CGS>                                        2,852,464
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,852,464
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,943,972
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             842,920
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               9370,154
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (370,154)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (370,154)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (6.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (6.44)



</TABLE>
www.gpo.gov

### §309a. Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated for the purposes of sections 309 and 309a of this title the sum of $25,000,000 for each fiscal year, and not to exceed $1,500,000 of such sum shall be available for administrative purposes.

(Aug. 3, 1956, ch. 930, §2, 70 Stat. 986; Pub. L. 87–273, Sept. 22, 1961, 75 Stat. 571; Pub. L. 88–230, §1(b), Dec. 23, 1963, 77 Stat. 471; Pub. L. 89–14, Apr. 22, 1965, 79 Stat. 74; Pub. L. 90–252, Feb. 3, 1968, 82 Stat. 4.)

#### Amendments

1968—Pub. L. 90–252 increased appropriation from $15,000,000 to $25,000,000.

1965—Pub. L. 89–14 increased appropriation from $12,000,000 to $15,000,000.

1963—Pub. L. 88–230 increased appropriation from $7,500,000 to $12,000,000 and amount available for administrative purposes from $1,000,000 to $1,500,000.

1961—Pub. L. 87–273 increased appropriation to $7,500,000 and amount available for administrative purposes to $1,000,000.

#### Section Referred to in Other Sections

This section is referred to in section 13e of this title.
#### § 31.1 General.

This part sets forth regulations to implement and administer the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (Pub. L. 110-343; 122 Stat. 3765).
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 137

To increase opportunities for veterans with service-connected disabilities to

participate in Department of Defense procurement actions.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. SOLOMON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on National Security

A BILL

To increase opportunities for veterans with service-connected

disabilities to participate in Department of Defense procurement actions.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This title may be cited as the ‘‘Procurement Opportu5 nities for Disabled Service Personnel Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. ENHANCED PARTICIPATION BY VETERANS IN DE7 FENSE PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS.

8 (a) VETERANS WITH SERVICE-CONNECTED DISABIL9 ITIES TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR SDB PROGRAM.—For pur10 poses of section 2323(a)(1)(A) of title 10, United States
2

•HR 137 IH

1 Code, an individual who is a veteran with a service-con2 nected disability (as determined by the Secretary of Veter3 ans Affairs) shall be deemed to be a socially and economi4 cally disadvantaged individual.

5 (b) IMPLEMENTATION.—Not later than 90 days after

6 the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of

7 Defense shall revise the regulations prescribed under sec8 tion 2323 of title 10, United States Code (and such other

9 regulations as may be necessary) in order to take into ac10 count the provisions of subsection (a) with respect to fiscal

11 years 1996 and 1997.

Æ
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 206.6 Cash management planning and review. ( a ) An agency shall periodically perform cash management reviews to identify areas needing improvement.
( b ) As part of its cash management review process, an agency is expected to document cash flows in order to provide an overview of its cash management activities and to identify areas that will yield savings after cash management initiatives are implemented. The Service will evaluate an agency's EFT policy and application, to include mitigating circumstances that may prevent the use of EFT, as part of the cash management reviews.
( c ) An agency's cash management reviews will provide the basis for identification of improvements and preparation of cash flow reports for submission to the Service as prescribed by I TFM 6-8000. That Chapter provides requirements for an agency in performing periodic cash management reviews, identifying improvements, and preparing cash flow reports. In addition, the Chapter describes the timing and content of periodic reports that must be submitted by an agency to the Service on progress made in implementing cash management initiatives and associated savings.
( d ) The Service will periodically review an agency's cash management program to ensure that adequate progress is being made to improve overall cash management at an agency. As part of its oversight authority, the Service may visit an agency and review all or specific cash management activities of an agency. An agency will be notified in advance of the Service's review and will be required to provide the Service with documentation of the agency cash management review within the timeframes required by I TFM 6-8000.