39920 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 141 / Friday, July 23, 1999 /Rules and Regulations

competition, jobs, the environment,

public health, or State, local, or tribal

governments or communities. The Mint

does not anticipate that the rule will

result in inconsistency, interfere with

another agency’s actions, materially

alter the budgetary impact of

entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan

programs or the rights and obligations of

recipients thereof, or raise novel legal or

policy issues arising out of legal

mandates, the President’s priorities, or

the principles set forth in Executive

Order 12866. It is hereby certified that

this regulation will not have a

significant economic impact on a

significant number of small entities.

Accordingly, a regulatory flexibility

analysis is not required. Lots of fused

and mixed coins recorded together as a

group constituted approximately 1% or

less of the total coin lots redeemed for

each of calendar 1996, 1997 and the

period ending July 31, 1998, amounting

to 23, 19 and 13 lots, respectively, of

fused and mixed coins. Although the

Mint does not maintain records which

consistently indicate the business or

personal nature of the transactions

conducted by individuals or entities

tendering coins for redemption, the

majority of these lots were submitted by

individuals transacting with the Mint in

their own name. Even if each such

individual were a ‘‘small entity’’ within

the meaning of 5 U.S.C. 604(a), the Mint

does not believe that this quantity of

lots indicates that a significant number

of small entities will be significantly

impacted if the Mint were to require

sorting of coins previously accepted as

mixed and discontinue accepting fused

coins.

List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 100

Currency, Gold.

For the reasons set forth in the

preamble, the United States Mint

amends 31 CFR Part 100 as follows:

PART 100—EXCHANGE OF PAPER

CURRENCY AND COIN

Subpart C—Exchange Of Coin

1. The authority citation for Part 100

is revised to read as follows:

Authority: 31 U.S.C. 321.

2. Revise § 100.11(b) to read as

follows:

§ 100.11 Exchange of bent and partial

coins.

* * * * *

(b) Redemption basis. Bent and partial

coins shall be presented separately by

denomination category in lots of at least

one pound for each category. Bent and

partial coins shall be redeemed on the

basis of their weight and denomination

category rates (which is the weight

equivalent of face value). If not

presented separately by denomination

category, bent and partial coins will not

be accepted for redemption.

Denomination categories and rates are

Cents, @ $1.4585 per pound; Nickels,

@ $4.5359 per pound; Dimes, Quarters,

Halves, and Eisenhower Dollars @

$20.00 per pound; and Anthony Dollars

@ $56.00 per pound. Copper plated zinc

cents shall be redeemed at the face

value equivalent of copper one cent

coins.

* * * * *

3. Revise § 100.12(b) to read as

follows:

§ 100.12 Exchange of fused and mixed

coins.

* * * * *

(b) The United States Mint will not

accept fused or mixed coins for

redemption.

Philip N. Diehl,

Director.

[FR Doc. 99–18849 Filed 7–22–99; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810–37–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[CA 71–154a; FRL6400–1]

Clean Air Act Approval and

Promulgation of California State

Implementation Plan for the San

Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution

Control District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final

action on revisions to the California

State Implementation Plan (SIP). The

revisions are rules from the San Joaquin

Valley Unified Air Pollution Control

District (District). These rules were

submitted by the State on behalf of the

District to provide general permitting

requirements and general provisions for

the implementation of NSR and other

SIP requirements for stationary sources

in the District.

This approval action will incorporate

these rules into the federally approved

SIP. EPA is approving these rules to

support District new source review

(NSR) rules that are required by section

110(a) and part D of Clean Air Act as

amended in 1990 (CAA or Act). These

other rules, which are required for areas

that have not attained the national

ambient air quality standards (NAAQS)

for one or more pollutants, will be the

subject of a subsequent rulemaking

action. Thus, EPA is finalizing the

approval of these general provisions and

general permitting rules into the

California SIP under provisions of the

CAA regarding EPA action on SIP

submittals, SIPs for national primary

and secondary ambient air quality

standards, and plan requirements for

nonattainment areas.

DATES: This rule is effective on

September 21, 1999 without further

notice, unless EPA receives adverse

comments by August 23, 1999. If EPA

receives such comment, it will publish

a timely withdrawal in the Federal

Register informing the public that EPA’s

approval of these rules will not take

effect.

ADDRESSES: Comments must be

submitted in writing to Ed Pike at the

Region IX mailing address listed below.

Copies of the rules and EPA’s evaluation

report are available for public

inspection at EPA’s Region IX office

during normal business hours. Copies of

the submitted rules are available for

inspection at the following locations:

Permits Office (AIR–3), Air Division,

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San

Francisco, CA 94105

Environmental Protection Agency, Air

Docket (6102), 401 ‘‘M’’ Street, SW,

Washington, DC 20460

California Air Resources Board,

Stationary Source Division, Rule

Evaluation Section, 2020 ‘‘L’’ Street,

Sacramento, CA 95814

San Joaquin Valley Unified Air

Pollution Control District, Central

Region, 1990 E. Gettysburg Avenue,

Fresno CA 93726

A courtesy copy of these rules may be

available via the Internet at http://

arbis.arb.ca.gov/drdb/sju/cur.htm.

However, these versions of the District

rules may be different than the versions

submitted to EPA for approval. Readers

are cautioned to verify that the adoption

date of the rule listed is the same as the

rule submitted to EPA for approval. The

official submittal is only available at the

four agency addresses listed above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ed

Pike, (telephone 415/744–1211), Air

Division (Air–3), U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, Region IX, 75

Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA

94105–3901, or pike.ed@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

I. Applicability

The rules being approved into the

California SIP in this action are District

Rules 1110, 1140, 1150, 2010, 2031,
Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 141 / Friday, July 23, 1999 /Rules and Regulations 39921

1This District includes the portion of Kern

County defined in District rule 1020 section 3.44

(adopted November 13, 1996 and approved at 64 FR

13514).

2Each County SIP generally contains a rule

corresponding to each of the current District rules

that EPA is taking action on, although the current

rules have been renumbered.

2040, 2070, 2080, and 2092. Rules 1110,

1140, 1150, 2010, and 2040 were

adopted by the District Board of

Directors on December 17, 1992, and

submitted to EPA by the California Air

Resources Board (CARB) as a revision to

the SIP on September 28, 1994. Rules

2031, 2070, 2080, and 2092 were

adopted by the District on December 17,

1992, and submitted to EPA by CARB

on November 18, 1993.

The District is composed of Fresno

County, a portion of Kern County 1,

Kings County, Madera County, Merced

County, San Joaquin County, Stanislaus

County, and Tulare County. The eight

former County air pollution

management agencies merged to form

the unified Valley-wide District in 1992.

The District is designated as a serious

nonattainment area for ozone and

particulate matter less than ten microns

in diameter (PM10). The District is

designated attainment for the nitrogen

dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and

carbon monoxide (CO) NAAQS,

although nitrogen oxides (including

NO2) and sulfur oxide (including SO2)

are regulated as precursors to other

nonattainment pollutants. For the

detailed area designations that apply to

the District, please refer to 40 CFR

81.305. The CAA air quality planning

requirements for nonattainment NSR are

set out in part D of Title I of the Act,

with implementing regulations at 40

CFR 51.160 through 51.165.

II. Summary of Rule Contents

Prior to the formation of the current

District in 1992, EPA had approved

separate SIPs for each of the eight

individual Counties.2 Today’s action

eliminates minor variations in the eight

separate County SIPs by approving one

set of rules that apply across all eight

counties. This action will provide

consistency and clarity by allowing

regulated sources of air pollution, the

public, and regulatory agencies to refer

to one set of rules for the entire District

rather than eight sets of rules.

District Rule 1110, ‘‘Circumvention,’’

prohibits concealment or dilution of

emissions to circumvent statutory or

regulatory requirements. District Rule

1140, ‘‘Applicability of Emission

Limits,’’ states that a source subject to

multiple emission limits must comply

with the most stringent applicable

emission or concentration rate unless

specifically exempted. Rule 1150,

‘‘Separation and Combination,’’

specifies how compliance is determined

for emission streams that are combined

prior to release to the atmosphere. These

rules are contained in the General

Provisions section of the District

regulations. They contain the

procedures for implementing other

requirements, but do not contain or

directly impose numerical air pollutant

limitations.

District Rule 2010, ‘‘Permits

Required,’’ contains the general

requirement to (1) obtain an Authority

to Construct permit for a new or

modified source; and (2) obtain a Permit

to Operate prior to operation. District

Rule 2031, ‘‘Transfer of Permits,’’

requires District approval for the

transfer of a permit to a different person

or piece of equipment. District Rule

2040, ‘‘Applications,’’ requires that

applicants submit all necessary

information and specifies the

administrative process for the District to

act on the application. District Rule

2070, ‘‘Standards for Granting

Applications,’’ explains the procedures

for the District to approve or deny an

application for an Authority to

Construct or Permit to Operate. District

Rule 2080, ‘‘Conditional Approval,’’

grants the District authority to issue or

revise specific written conditions on an

Authority to Construct or a Permit to

Operate to assure compliance with air

contaminant emission standards or

limitations. District Rule 2092,

‘‘Standards for Permits to Operate,’’

defines the conditions which must be

met in order for the District to issue a

Permit to Operate.

III. EPA Evaluation and Action

The air quality planning requirements

for nonattainment NSR are set out in

part D of title I of the Clean Air Act. EPA

has issued a ‘‘General Preamble’’

describing EPA’s preliminary views on

how EPA intends to review SIPs and SIP

revisions submitted under part D,

including those State submittals

containing nonattainment NSR SIP

requirements (see 57 FR 13498 (April

16, 1992) and 57 FR 18070 (April 28,

1992)). Because EPA is describing its

interpretations here only in broad terms,

the reader should refer to the General

Preamble for a more detailed discussion.

EPA has also proposed regulations to

implement the changes under the 1990

Amendments in the NSR provisions in

part D of Title I of the Act. (See 61 FR

38249 (July 23, 1996)). Upon final

promulgation of those regulations, EPA

will review those NSR SIP submittals on

which it has already taken final action

to determine whether additional SIP

revisions are necessary.

This rulemaking replaces rules from

the following SIPs: Fresno County, Kern

County, Kings County, Madera County,

Merced County, San Joaquin County,

Stanislaus County, and Tulare County.

EPA’s approval of the following rules

replaces similar categories of rules in

the individual County SIPs:

Circumvention (Rule 1110),

Applicability of Emission Limits (Rule

1140), Separation and Combination

(Rule 1150), Permits Required (Rule

2010), Transfer of Permits (Rule 2031),

Applications (2040), Standards for

Granting Applications (Rule 2070), and

Standards for Permits to Operate (Rule

2092). Please see the Technical Support

Document for a complete list of the SIP

rules that EPA is replacing.

EPA has evaluated District Rules 110,

1140, 1150, 2010, 2031, 2040, 2070,

2080, and 2092 and has determined that

each rule is consistent with the CAA,

EPA regulations and EPA policy. These

general provisions and permitting rules

will support permitting requirements for

major and minor sources in the District

(updates to District New Source Review

requirements will be the subject of

subsequent EPA rulemaking action).

Therefore, these rules are being

approved under section 110(k)(3) of the

CAA as consistent with the

requirements of section 110(a),

including section 110(a)(2)(C), and part

D of Title I of the Act. For additional

description of these Rules and EPA’s

approval action, please refer to the

Technical Support Document for this

action.

EPA is publishing this direct final

approval without prior proposal because

the Agency views this SIP revision as a

noncontroversial revision and

anticipates no adverse comments.

However, in the proposed rules section

of this Federal Register publication,

EPA is publishing a separate document

that will serve as the proposal to

approve the SIP revision should adverse

comments be filed. This direct final

approval will be effective September 21,

1999 without further notice unless the

Agency receives adverse comments by

August 23, 1999.

If the EPA receives such comments,

then EPA will publish a timely

withdrawal in the Federal Register

informing the public that the rule will

not take effect. All public comments

received will then be addressed in a

subsequent final rule based on the

proposed rule. The EPA will not

institute a second comment period on

this rule. Any parties interested in

commenting on this rule should do so

at this time. If no such comments are
39922 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 141 / Friday, July 23, 1999 /Rules and Regulations

received, the public is advised that this

direct final approval will be effective on

September 21, 1999 and no further

action will be taken on the proposed

rule.

IV. Administrative Requirements

A. Executive Order 12866

The Office of Management and Budget

(OMB) has exempted this regulatory

action from Executive Order (E.O.)

12866, Regulatory Planning and Review.

B. Executive Order 12875

Under Executive Order 12875,

Enhancing the Intergovernmental

Partnership, EPA may not issue a

regulation that is not required by statute

and that creates a mandate upon a State,

local or tribal government, unless the

Federal government provides the funds

necessary to pay the direct compliance

costs incurred by those governments, or

EPA consults with those governments. If

EPA complies by consulting, Executive

Order 12875 requires EPA to provide to

the Office of Management and Budget a

description of the extent of EPA’s prior

consultation with representatives of

affected State, local and tribal

governments, the nature of their

concerns, copies of any written

communications from the governments,

and a statement supporting the need to

issue the regulation. In addition,

Executive Order 12875 requires EPA to

develop an effective process permitting

elected officials and other

representatives of State, local and tribal

governments ‘‘to provide meaningful

and timely input in the development of

regulatory proposals containing

significant unfunded mandates.’’

Today’s rule does not create a mandate

on State, local or tribal governments.

The rule does not impose any

enforceable duties on these entities.

Accordingly, the requirements of

section 1(a) of E.O. 12875 do not apply

to this rule.

C. Executive Order 13045

Protection of Children from

Environmental Health Risks and Safety

Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),

applies to any rule that: (1) is

determined to be ‘‘economically

significant’’ as defined under E.O.

12866, and (2) concerns an

environmental health or safety risk that

EPA has reason to believe may have a

disproportionate effect on children. If

the regulatory action meets both criteria,

the Agency must evaluate the

environmental health or safety effects of

the planned rule on children, and

explain why the planned regulation is

preferable to other potentially effective

and reasonably feasible alternatives

considered by the Agency. This rule is

not subject to E.O. 13045 because it does

not involve decisions intended to

mitigate environmental health or safety

risks.

D. Executive Order 13084

Under Executive Order 13084,

Consultation and Coordination with

Indian Tribal Governments, EPA may

not issue a regulation that is not

required by statute, that significantly or

uniquely affects the communities of

Indian tribal governments, and that

imposes substantial direct compliance

costs on those communities, unless the

Federal government provides the funds

necessary to pay the direct compliance

costs incurred by the tribal

governments, or EPA consults with

those governments. If EPA complies by

consulting, Executive Order 13084

requires EPA to provide to the Office of

Management and Budget, in a separately

identified section of the preamble to the

rule, a description of the extent of EPA’s

prior consultation with representatives

of affected tribal governments, a

summary of the nature of their concerns,

and a statement supporting the need to

issue the regulation. In addition,

Executive Order 13084 requires EPA to

develop an effective process permitting

elected officials and other

representatives of Indian tribal

governments ‘‘to provide meaningful

and timely input in the development of

regulatory policies on matters that

significantly or uniquely affect their

communities.’’ Today’s rule does not

significantly or uniquely affect the

communities of Indian tribal

governments. Accordingly, the

requirements of section 3(b) of E.O.

13084 do not apply to this rule.

E. Regulatory Flexibility Act

The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

generally requires an agency to conduct

a regulatory flexibility analysis of any

rule subject to notice and comment

rulemaking requirements unless the

agency certifies that the rule will not

have a significant economic impact on

a substantial number of small entities.

Small entities include small businesses,

small not-for-profit enterprises, and

small governmental jurisdictions. This

final rule will not have a significant

impact on a substantial number of small

entities because SIP approvals under

section 110 and subchapter I, part D of

the Clean Air Act do not create any new

requirements but simply approve

requirements that the State is already

imposing. Therefore, because the

Federal SIP approval does not create

any new requirements, I certify that this

action will not have a significant

economic impact on a substantial

number of small entities. Moreover, due

to the nature of the Federal-State

relationship under the Clean Air Act,

preparation of flexibility analysis would

constitute Federal inquiry into the

economic reasonableness of state action.

The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base

its actions concerning SIPs on such

grounds. Union Electric Co., v. U.S.

EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255–66 (1976); 42

U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).

F. Unfunded Mandates

Under section 202 of the Unfunded

Mandates Reform Act of 1995

(‘‘Unfunded Mandates Act’’), signed

into law on March 22, 1995, EPA must

prepare a budgetary impact statement to

accompany any proposed or final rule

that includes a Federal mandate that

may result in estimated annual costs to

State, local, or tribal governments in the

aggregate; or to the private sector, of

$100 million or more. Under section

205, EPA must select the most costeffective and least burdensome

alternative that achieves the objectives

of the rule and is consistent with

statutory requirements. Section 203

requires EPA to establish a plan for

informing and advising any small

governments that may be significantly

or uniquely impacted by the rule.

EPA has determined that the approval

action promulgated does not include a

Federal mandate that may result in

estimated annual costs of $100 million

or more to either State, local, or tribal

governments in the aggregate, or to the

private sector. This Federal action

approves pre-existing requirements

under State or local law, and imposes

no new requirements. Accordingly, no

additional costs to State, local, or tribal

governments, or to the private sector,

result from this action.

G. Submission to Congress and the

Comptroller General

The Congressional Review Act, 5

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small

Business Regulatory Enforcement

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides

that before a rule may take effect, the

agency promulgating the rule must

submit a rule report, which includes a

copy of the rule, to each House of the

Congress and to the Comptroller General

of the United States. EPA will submit a

report containing this rule and other

required information to the U.S. Senate,

the U.S. House of Representatives, and

the Comptroller General of the United

States prior to publication of the rule in

the Federal Register. This rule is not a

‘‘major’’ rule as defined by 5 U.S.C.

804(2).
Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 141 / Friday, July 23, 1999 /Rules and Regulations 39923

1For a description of the boundaries of the Los

Angeles-South Coast Air Basin, see 40 CFR 81.305.

The nonattainment area includes all of Orange

County and the more populated portions of Los

Angeles, San Bernardino, and Riverside Counties.

2The South Coast plan sometimes substitutes the

term Reactive Organic Gases (ROG) for VOC. These

terms are essentially synonymous.

3CARB submitted the Executive Order on May

20, 1999. We found the submittal complete on May

20, 1999. We adopted the completeness criteria on

February 16, 1990 (55 FR 5830) and, pursuant to

section 110(k)(1)(A) of the CAA, revised the criteria

on August 26, 1991 (56 FR 42216).

H. Petitions for Judicial Review

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of

this action must be filed in the United

States Court of Appeals for the

appropriate circuit by September 21,

1999. Filing a petition for

reconsideration by the Administrator of

this final rule does not affect the finality

of this rule for the purposes of judicial

review nor does it extend the time

within which a petition for judicial

review may be filed, and shall not

postpone the effectiveness of such rule

or action. This action may not be

challenged later in proceedings to

enforce its requirements. (See section

307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

Environmental protection, Air

pollution control, General provisions,

Hydrocarbons, Incorporation by

reference, Intergovernmental relations,

New source review, Nitrogen dioxide,

Particulate matter, Permits, Reporting

and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur

dioxide, Volatile organic compounds.

Note: Incorporation by reference of the

State Implementation Plan for the State of

California was approved by the Director of

the Federal Register on July 1, 1982.

Dated: July 7, 1999.

Felicia Marcus,

Regional Administrator, Region IX.

Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code

of Federal Regulations is amended as

follows:

PART 52—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for Part 52

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart F—California

2. Section 52.220 is amended by

adding paragraphs (c)(194)(i)(C)(4) and

(c)(199)(i)(D)(6) to read as follows:

§ 52.220 Identification of plan.

* * * * *

(c) * * *

(194) * * *

(i) * * *

(C) * * *

(4) Rules 2031, 2070, 2080, and 2092

adopted on May 21, 1992 and amended

on December 17, 1992.

* * * * *

(199) * * *

(i) * * *

(D) * * *

(6) Rules 1110, 1140, 1150, 2010, and

2040 amended on December 17, 1992.

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 99–18600 Filed 7–22–99; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[CA–227–151; FRL–6378–2]

Approval and Promulgation of State

Implementation Plans; California—

South Coast

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: EPA is concluding the Public

Consultative Process (PCP) on mobile

source emission reductions needed for

attainment of the 1-hour ozone national

ambient air quality standard (NAAQS)

in the Los Angeles-South Coast Air

Basin Area (South Coast). EPA is also

approving the State’s update to the state

implementation plan (SIP) for ozone in

the South Coast to reflect the outcome

of this process and the implementation

status of some of the control measures.

Finally, EPA is approving the State’s

joint commitment with EPA to issue

regulations to eliminate the remaining

SIP shortfall as determined appropriate

for each agency. EPA is taking these

actions under provisions of the Clean

Air Act (CAA) regarding EPA action on

SIP submittals, SIPs for NAAQS, and

plan requirements for nonattainment

areas.

EFFECTIVE DATE: This rule is effective on

August 23, 1999.

ADDRESSES: The rulemaking docket for

this rule is available for public

inspection during normal business

hours at EPA’s Region IX office, Air

Division, 75 Hawthorne Street, San

Francisco, CA 94105–3901. A

reasonable fee may be charged for

copying parts of the docket.

Electronic availability: This document

is also available as an electronic file on

EPA’s Region 9 Web Page at http://

www.epa.gov/region09.

Copies of related materials are also

available for inspection at the following

location: California Air Resources

Board, 2020 L Street, Sacramento,

California.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dave Jesson, EPA Region IX Air

Planning Office, (415) 744–1288, or

jesson.david@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. EPA’s Final Action

We are concluding the Public

Consultative Process on mobile source

reductions needed for attainment of the

1-hour ozone NAAQS in the South

Coast.1 During this process, we have

issued or are in the process of issuing

regulations which are expected to

reduce emissions of nitrogen oxides

(NOX) in the South Coast in 2010 by

approximately 94 tons per day (tpd),

and reduce emissions of volatile organic

compounds (VOC) by about 39 tpd.2

This is roughly 85 percent of the Federal

emission reductions identified in the

1994 ozone SIP submittal for the South

Coast.

To achieve the remaining reductions

(15 tpd of NOX and 8 tpd of VOC), we

intend to continue a focused

cooperative effort with California to

resolve remaining issues and to agree

upon the best approach for achieving

the balance of reductions still

unaccomplished. We will complete by

December 31, 2001, any actions

identified as appropriate for our

rulemaking under our existing

commitment, promulgated when we

approved the 1994 ozone SIP (40 CFR

52.238).

We are approving a similar

commitment by the California Air

Resources Board (CARB). The State

included this commitment in Executive

Order G–99–037, dated May 20, 1999.3

In the order, CARB ‘‘commits to

continue working with U.S. EPA and

the affected parties to achieve the

emission reductions identified in the

SIP for federal measures, and to (a)

adopt by December 31, 2000, and

submit as a SIP revision, a revised

attainment demonstration for the federal

one-hour ozone standard in the South

Coast Air Basin, and (b) adopt by

December 31, 2001, control measures

needed to achieve any additional

emission reductions which are

determined to be appropriate for ARB.’’

This State commitment replaces a

commitment made at the beginning of

the Public Consultative Process in 1996,

and codified at 40 CFR 52.220(c)(235).

We are therefore rescinding that prior

commitment.

Finally, we are approving the State’s

update on the status of CARB control

measures in the 1994 ozone SIP,

included as Attachment A to the

Executive Order. This update displays