alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 131

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1996, and for

other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 13, 1995

Mr. GEPHARDT (for himself, Mr. OBEY, and Mr. MURTHA) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on National Security, for a

period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for

consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

1996, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FURTHER CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS.

4 Section 106(c) of Public Law 104–56 is amended by

5 striking ‘‘December 15, 1995’’ and inserting ‘‘January 26,

6 1996’’.
2

•HJ 131 IH

1 SEC. 2. MILITARY PAY RAISE FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996.

2 (a) WAIVER OF SECTION 1009 ADJUSTMENT.—Any

3 adjustment required by section 1009 of title 37, United

4 States Code, in elements of compensation of members of

5 the uniformed services to become effective during fiscal

6 year 1996 shall not be made.

7 (b) INCREASE IN BASIC PAY AND BAS.—Effective on

8 January 1, 1996, the rates of basic pay and basic allow9 ance for subsistence of members of the uniformed services

10 are increased by 2.4 percent.

11 (c) INCREASE IN BAQ.—Effective on January 1,

12 1996, the rates of basic allowance for quarters of members

13 of the uniformed services are increased by 5.2 percent.

14 SEC. 3. ELIMINATION OF DISPARITY BETWEEN EFFECTIVE

15 DATES FOR MILITARY AND CIVILIAN RE16 TIREE COST-OF-LIVING ADJUSTMENTS FOR

17 FISCAL YEAR 1996.

18 (a) IN GENERAL.—The fiscal year 1996 increase in

19 military retired pay shall (notwithstanding subparagraph

20 (B) of section 1401a(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code)

21 first be payable as part of such retired pay for the month

22 of March 1996.

23 (b) DEFINITIONS.—For the purposes of subsection

24 (a):

25 (1) The term ‘‘fiscal year 1996 increase in mili26 tary retired pay’’ means the increase in retired pay
3

•HJ 131 IH

1 that, pursuant to paragraph (1) of section 1401a(b)

2 of title 10, United States Code, becomes effective on

3 December 1, 1995.

4 (2) The term ‘‘retired pay’’ includes retainer

5 pay.

6 (c) FINANCING.—The Secretary of Defense shall

7 transfer, from any other funds made available to the De8 partment of Defense, such sums as may be necessary for

9 payment to the Department of Defense Military Retire10 ment Fund solely for the purpose of offsetting the esti11 mated increase in outlays to be made from such Fund in

12 fiscal year 1996 by reason of the provisions of subsection

13 (a). Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the trans14 fer authority made available to the Secretary in Public

15 Law 104–61 or any other law shall be increased by the

16 amounts required to carry out the provisions of this sec17 tion.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1324 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1324

 To enforce the law regulating the height of buildings in the District 
 of Columbia by prohibiting the District of Columbia from issuing any 
 building or occupancy permit for the proposed development located at 
 1328 G Street Northwest unless the development is modified to conform 
                              to such law.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 24, 1995

  Mr. Stark introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To enforce the law regulating the height of buildings in the District 
 of Columbia by prohibiting the District of Columbia from issuing any 
 building or occupancy permit for the proposed development located at 
 1328 G Street Northwest unless the development is modified to conform 
                              to such law.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITING DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FROM ISSUING BUILDING OR 
              OCCUPANCY PERMIT.

    The District of Columbia may not issue any building or occupancy 
permit for the proposed development located at 1328 G Street Northwest, 
as described in D.C. Act 10-395, unless the development is modified so 
that the height of the building proposed to be constructed under the 
development does not exceed 110 feet.
                                 <all>
```
§ 19.425 When do I check to see if a person is excluded or disqualified? As an agency official, you must check to see if a person is excluded or disqualified before you— ( a ) Enter into a primary tier covered transaction;
( b ) Approve a principal in a primary tier covered transaction;
( c ) Approve a lower tier participant if agency approval of the lower tier participant is required; or
( d ) Approve a principal in connection with a lower tier transaction if agency approval of the principal is required.
###### Editorial Note on [Subchapter A of Chapter II](/current/title-31/chapter-II/subchapter-A)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at [78 FR 60697](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/78-FR-60697), Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 205.5 What are the thresholds for major Federal assistance programs?

(a) Table A of this section defines major Federal assistance programs based on the dollar amount of an individual Federal assistance program and the dollar amount of all Federal assistance being received by a State for all Federal assistance programs including non-cash programs. A State must locate the appropriate row in Column A based upon the total amount of Federal assistance received. In that same row, a State must apply the percentage from Column B to the dollar value of all its Federal assistance programs to determine the State's threshold for major Federal assistance programs. For example, if the total amount received by a State for all Federal assistance programs is $50 million, then that State's threshold for major Federal assistance programs is 6% of $50 million or $3 million. A State which receives more than $10 billion under Federal assistance programs will have a minimum default threshold of $60 million.

(b) To ensure adequate coverage of all State programs, a State must, on an annual basis, compare its program coverage using the percentage obtained from Table A to the program coverage which would result using a percentage which is half of the percentage obtained from Table A. For example, a State receiving $1 billion in Federal Assistance would use Table A to learn that its threshold level would be .60 percent of $1 billion. A State would compare program coverage at .60 percent of $1 billion to program coverage at .30 percent of $1 billion.

(c) If the comparison conducted under [paragraph (b)](/on/2024-09-17/title-31/section-205.5#p-205.5(b)) of this section results in a reduction of program coverage that is greater than 10%, a State must lower its threshold, or add programs, until the difference is less than or equal to 10%.

(d) In accordance with [§ 205.3(b)](/on/2024-09-17/title-31/section-205.3#p-205.3(b)), a State may lower its threshold to include additional programs. All of a State's programs that meet this lower threshold would be subject to this subpart A.

(e) Unless specified otherwise, major Federal assistance programs must be determined from the most recent Single Audit data available.

Table A to [§ 205.5](/on/2024-09-17/title-31/section-205.5)

| Column A Total amount of Federal Assistance for all programs per State: | Column B Major Federal Assistance Program means any Federal assistance program that exceed these levels: |
| --- | --- |
| Between zero and $100 million inclusive | 6.00 percent of the total amount of Federal assistance. |
| Over $100 million but less than or equal to $10 billion | 0.60 percent of the total amount of Federal assistance. |
| Over $10 billion | The greater of 0.30 percent of the total Federal assistance of $60 million. |
§ 1010.840 Criminal penalty. ( a ) Any person who willfully violates any provision of Title I of Public Law 91-508, or of this chapter authorized thereby may, upon conviction thereof, be fined not more than $1,000 or be imprisoned not more than 1 year, or both. Such person may in addition, if the violation is of any provision authorized by Title I of Public Law 91-508 and if the violation is committed in furtherance of the commission of any violation of Federal law punishable by imprisonment for more than 1 year, be fined not more than $10,000 or be imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.
( b ) Any person who willfully violates any provision of Title II of Public Law 91-508, or of this chapter authorized thereby, may, upon conviction thereof, be fined not more than $250,000 or be imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.
( c ) Any person who willfully violates any provision of Title II of Public Law 91-508, or of this chapter authorized thereby, where the violation is either ( 1 ) Committed while violating another law of the United States, or
( 2 ) Committed as part of a pattern of any illegal activity involving more than $100,000 in any 12-month period, may, upon conviction thereof, be fined not more than $500,000 or be imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.
( d ) Any person who knowingly makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statement or representation in any report required by this chapter may, upon conviction thereof, be fined not more than $10,000 or be imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.
# L_2020419EN.01001501.xml

| 11.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 419/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 419/15

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2020/2025

of 4 December 2020

on the position to be adopted, on behalf of the European Union, within the EEA Joint Committee concerning an amendment to Annex IV (Energy) to the EEA Agreement

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 194 in conjunction with Article 218(9) thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2894/94 of 28 November 1994 concerning arrangements for implementing the Agreement on the European Economic Area (1), and in particular Article 1(3) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | The Agreement on the European Economic Area (2) (‘the EEA Agreement’) entered into force on 1 January 1994. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The Agreement on the European Economic Area (2) (‘the EEA Agreement’) entered into force on 1 January 1994.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 98 of the EEA Agreement, the EEA Joint Committee may decide to amend Annex IV to the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 98 of the EEA Agreement, the EEA Joint Committee may decide to amend Annex IV to the EEA Agreement.

| (3) | Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 (3) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 (3) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (4) | Annex IV to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Annex IV to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly.

| (5) | The position of the Union within the EEA Joint Committee should therefore be based on the draft decision of the EEA Joint Committee, |
| --- | --- |

(5)

The position of the Union within the EEA Joint Committee should therefore be based on the draft decision of the EEA Joint Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The position to be adopted, on behalf of the Union, within the EEA Joint Committee on the proposed amendment to Annex IV (Energy) to the EEA Agreement, shall be based on the draft decision of the EEA Joint Committee (4).

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 4 December 2020.

For the Council

The President

M. ROTH

---

(1)  
  OJ L 305, 30.11.1994, p. 6.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3.

2

(3)  Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 of 23 November 2017 establishing a guideline on electricity balancing (OJ L 312, 28.11.2017, p. 6).

3

(4)  See document ST 12942/20 at http://register.consilium.europa.eu

4

---
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1290 Engrossed in House (EH)]

    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1290

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To reinstate the permit for, and extend the deadline under the Federal 
Power Act applicable to the construction of, a hydroelectric project in 
                    Oregon, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REINSTATEMENT OF PERMIT EXTENSION DEADLINE.

    Notwithstanding the expiration of the permit and notwithstanding 
the time period specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 
U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission project numbered 7829, the Commission shall, at the request 
of the licensee for the project, reinstate the permit effective May 23, 
1993, and extend the time period during which the licensee is required 
to commence the construction of the project so as to terminate on May 
25, 1999.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 13, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
                                     

104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1290

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To reinstate the permit for, and extend the deadline under the Federal 
Power Act applicable to the construction of, a hydroelectric project in 
                    Oregon, and for other purposes.
```
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 156 (Friday, August 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 41176]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19627]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]


U.S. Canadian Minerals, Inc.; Order of Suspension of Trading

August 12, 2009.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
U.S. Canadian Minerals, Inc. (OTC Bulletin Board symbol: USCN), a 
Nevada corporation. Questions have been raised about the accuracy and 
adequacy of publicly disseminated information concerning, among other 
things, U.S. Canadian Minerals' liabilities, stock issuances, recent 
merger transaction, business prospects, and recently acquired purported 
assets.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of U.S. Canadian Minerals, Inc.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the 
above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT, 
August 12, 2009, through 11:59 p.m. EDT, on August 25, 2009.

    By the Commission.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-19627 Filed 8-12-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
www.gpo.gov

### §315. Time for completion of road; forfeiture

If any such company shall fail to construct and put in operation one-tenth of its entire line in one year, or to complete its road within three years after the approval of its map of location by the Secretary of the Interior, the right of way granted shall be deemed forfeited and abandoned ipso facto as to that portion of the road not then constructed and in operation: *Provided*, That the Secretary may, when he deems proper, extend, for a period not exceeding two years, the time for the completion of any road for which right of way has been granted and a part of which shall have been built.

(Mar. 2, 1899, ch. 374, §4, 30 Stat. 991.)

#### Cross References

Pueblo Indians of New Mexico, application of section, see section 322 of this title.

#### Section Referred to in Other Sections

This section is referred to in sections 312, 314, 316, 317, 318, 322 of this title.
Exhibit 31.2CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002I, Dennis E. Valentine, certify that: 1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of JMARTechnologies, Inc.;  2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;  3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report(based on such evaluation); and  c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and 5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.         By:  /s/ Dennis E. Valentine    Dennis E. Valentine    Chief Financial Officer   November 13, 2006
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Rafael GARCIA-ZUNIGA, also known as Robert Farias, also known as Zuniga Erasmo Rodriguez, Appellant.

No. 02-1585.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted June 11, 2002.

Filed June 20, 2002.

Before LOKEN, BYE, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Rafael Garcia-Zuniga pleaded guilty to re-entering the United States illegally after deportation, following his conviction for an aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b). The district court1 departed upward, finding that Gareia-Zuniga’s criminal history was underrepresented, and sentenced him to 68 months imprisonment and 2 years supervised release. On appeal, counsel has moved to withdraw under *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and has filed a brief arguing that the district court erred in departing upward.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by departing upward. *See United States v. Levi,*229 F.3d 677, 679 (8th Cir.2000). It properly considered Garcia-Zuniga’s past charged and uncharged conduct, as outlined in the unobjected-to presentence report. *See*U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3; *Levi*229 F.3d at 679; *United States v. Beatty,*9 F.3d 686, 690 (8th Cir.1993); *United States v. Davila,*964 F.2d 778, 784-85 (8th Cir.), *cert. denied,*506 U.S. 964, 113 S.Ct. 438, 121 L.Ed.2d 358 (1992). Further, following our independent review, *see Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues.

Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

1

. The HONORABLE MARK W. BENNETT, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa.
www.gpo.gov

### §168a. Repealed. Pub. L. 98–621, §10(d)(1), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3379

Section, act Aug. 4, 1947, ch. 478, §2, 61 Stat. 751; 1970 Reorg. Plan No. 2, §102, eff. July 1, 1970, 35 F.R. 7959, 84 Stat. 2085, related to payment by executive departments for care of patients of Saint Elizabeths Hospital for whom they were responsible.

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1987, see section 12(b) of Pub. L. 98–621, set out as an Effective Date note under section 225 of this title.
www.gpo.gov

### §684. Per capita payment to tribal members; installments; rules and regulations

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to withdraw as much as may be necessary from the fund on deposit in the Treasury of the United States arising from the proceeds of the sale of timber and lumber within the Red Lake Reservation in Minnesota, according to the provisions of the Act of May 18, 1916 (39 Stat. 137), to the credit of the Red Lake Indians in Minnesota, and to pay therefrom $50 to each member of the Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians of Minnesota who is living on August 27, 1954. Such payment shall be made in two installments of $25 each, the first to be made within thirty days of ratification by the Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians of Minnesota as provided for in section 685 of this title, the second installment ninety days thereafter, and under such other rules and regulations as the Secretary of the Interior may prescribe.

(Aug. 27, 1954, ch. 1011, §1, 68 Stat. 878.)

#### References in Text

Act of May 18, 1916, referred to in text, is act May 18, 1916, ch. 125, 39 Stat. 123. Provisions of the act relating to sale of timber are set out at 39 Stat. 137 and were not classified to the Code.

#### Section Referred to in Other Sections

This section is referred to in sections 685, 686 of this title.