alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-24,164-02

EX P ARTE DENNIS LE VECE MAYES, Appl icant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. W12-53766-K (A) IN CRIMINA L DIST RICT COURT NO. 4

F ROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Applicant was convicted of ag g rava ted sexual assault of a ch i l d and sentenc ed to life imprisonment. The Fifth Court of Appea ls aff irmed his conviction. Ma ye s v. State , No. 05-16- 00490-CR (Tex. App.—Dallas May 23, 2017) (not desig nated for publication). Applicant filed this application for a writ of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district cler k forwa rded it to thi s Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. Applicant contends that trial counsel failed, among other things, to reque st that the State elec t which incident it would re ly on and to object to the a dmission of e x trane ous misconduct evidenc e beca use no notice was provided. Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to relief

. Strickland v. W

ashington , 466 U.S. 668 (1984). Acc ording ly , the rec ord should be develope d. The2

trial court is the appropr iate forum for finding s of fac t. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to the above claims. I n developing the rec ord, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). I f the trial court elec ts to hold a hear ing, it shall dete rmine whe ther Applica nt is indi g ent. I f Applica nt is indi g ent and wants to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to repr esent him at the hear ing. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. I f counsel is appointed or reta ined, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name

. The trial court shall make finding s of fac t and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel’s perf ormanc e was defic ient and Appl i ca n t wa s p rejudice d. The trial court may make any other finding s and conc lusions that it deems a ppropriate in response to Applica nt’s claims. The t ri al court shall make findings of fac t and conclusions of l aw within ninety day s from the date of this order

. The district cler k shall then immediately forwa rd to this Court the trial court’s finding s and conclusions and the rec ord develope d on rema nd, including, among other things, aff idavits, motions, objections, proposed finding s and conclusions, o rders, and transcr ipts from hear ings and depositions. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4). Any extensions of time must be reque sted by the trial cour

t and obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: Apr il 15, 2020 Do not publish
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: The regulations contained in this part have been recodified in 46 CFR part 287.

§ 2.1-24 Extent of tax liability. ( a ) *Declared value excess-profits tax.* Gain which is includible in gross income under § 2.1-23 shall be included in gross income for all income and excess-profits tax purposes, but not for the purposes of the declared value excess-profits tax and the capital stock tax as provided in section 511(i) of the Act. In lieu of any adjustment with respect to such declared value excess-profits tax, there is imposed for any taxable year ending on or before June 30, 1945, in which the gain is realized an additional tax of 1.1 percent of the amount of the gain. No additional capital stock tax liability is incurred.
( b ) *Improper deposits.* In the case of deposits in the construction reserve fund of amounts derived from sources other than those specified in section 511 of the Act, or in the case of failure to deposit an amount equal to the “net proceeds” or “net indemnity” within the period prescribed in section 511(c) of the Act and § 2.1-15, the taxpayer obtains no suspension or postponement of any tax liability and the tax is collectible without regard to the provisions of section 511(c) of the Act.
( c ) *Time for filing claim subsequent to election under section 511(c)(2).* If an election is made under section 511(c)(2) of the Act and paragraph (a)(2) of § 2.1-12, and if computation or recomputation in accordance therewith is otherwise allowable but is prevented, on the date of filing of notice of such election, or within six months thereafter, by any statute of limitation; such computation or recomputation nevertheless shall be made notwithstanding such statute if a claim therefor is filed within six months after the date of making such election. If as the result of such computation or recomputation an overpayment is disclosed a claim for refund should be made in accordance with § 301.6402-3 within such six months' period. For other rules applicable to the filing of claims for credit or refund of an overpayment of tax, see § 301.6402-2 of this chapter (Regulations on Procedure and Administration), relating to claims for credit or refund.
[T.D. 6820, 30 FR 6030, Apr. 29, 1965, as amended by T.D. 7410, 41 FR 11020, Mar. 16, 1976]
#### § 19.360 What happens if I fail to disclose the information required under § 19.355?

If we later determine that you failed to tell the person at the higher tier that you were excluded or disqualified at the time you entered into the covered transaction with that person, we may pursue any available remedies, including suspension and debarment.
IB

Union Calendar No. 42

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1218

[Report No. 104–88]

To extend the authority of the Federal Communications Commission to use

competitive bidding in granting licenses and permits.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 13, 1995

Mr. BLILEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Commerce

MARCH 23, 1995

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union

and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To extend the authority of the Federal Communications

Commission to use competitive bidding in granting licenses and permits.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1218 RH

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.

2 Section 309(j)(11) of the Communications Act of

3 1934 (47 U.S.C. 309(j)(11)) is amended by striking ‘‘Sep4 tember 30, 1998’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2000’’.

Union Calendar No. 42

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1218

[Report No. 104–88]

A BILL

To extend the authority of the Federal Communicagranting licenses and permits. tions Commission to use competitive bidding in

MARCH 23, 1995

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                              Exhibit 11
                              Bankers Corp.
                              Computation of Earnings Per Share


                                                Three Months Ended          
                                                    March 31,
                                                __________________

(in thousands, except per share data)          1997        1996      
<S>                                            <C>         <C>
Primary:
    Average shares outstanding                 12,378       12,901
    Net effect of the assumed exercise of
    stock options-based on the treasury
    stock method using average market
    price                                         270          261
                                              _______      _______
       Total                                   12,648       13,162
                                               ======       ======
                                                   
    Net income                                $ 7,113      $ 6,207
                                              =======      =======                                   
                                                           

    Net income per share                      $  0.56      $  0.47
                                                  
                                                      
Fully Diluted:
    Average shares outstanding                 12,378       12,901   
    Net effect of the assumed exercise of
    stock options-based on treasury
    stock method using average market price
    or period-end market price, whichever
    is higher                                     275          261
                                              _______      _______   

                                 Total         12,653       13,162
                                               ======       ======                                             
                                                                       
     Net income                               $ 7,113     $  6,207
                                               ======        =====             
                
    Net income per share                      $  0.56     $   0.47
                                                =====        =====
                                                                          
</TABLE>
NO. 07-12-0365-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

DECEMBER 20, 2012

______________________________

NORTHERN LAW FIRM, P.C. AND

VAN W. NORTHERN, INDIVIDUALLY, APPELLANTS

V.

YELLOW BOOK SALES AND DISTRIBUTION COMPANY, INC., APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 098953-00-1; HONORABLE W.F. “CORKY” ROBERTS, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

**MEMORANDUM OPINION**

****Appellants, Northern Law Firm, P.C. and Van W. Northern, Individually, filed this appeal complaining of the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of Appellee, Yellow Book Sales and Distribution Company, Inc.  Pending in this Court is an agreed motion signed by both parties in which they represent the trial court committed reversible error by granting summary judgment when a fact issue existed.  They request the trial court’s judgment be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

	Pursuant to Rule 43.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we grant the motion.[footnoteRef:1]  Accordingly, the trial court’s judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. [1: See also Tex. R. App. P. 42.1 (Notes and Comments) (noting that a new trial may not be ordered by agreement of the parties absent reversible error.] 

							Patrick A. Pirtle

							      Justice

2
2011 authorization from Decision XXI/11

U.S. authorization from Decision XXI/11 2,055,200 8.1% 2,055,200 8.1%

- Maximum allowable new production/import 1,855,200 7.3% 1,855,200 7.3%

= Minimum allowable CSA 200,000 0.8% 200,000 0.8%

Calculate supply chain factor

U.S. authorization (1) 2,055,200 8.1% 2,055,200 8.1%

 - Reduction for uptake of alternatives 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

 = One year's CUE need 2,055,200 8.1% 2,055,200 8.1%

x Percentage of year's production to recover 58% 58%

= SCF to meet that need 1,192,000 4.7% 1,192,000 4.7%

Calculate stocks (= CSA)

Existing pre-phaseout inv on 1/1/10 ("ES") 3,062,674 1,802,715

- 2010 CSA Use ("D") 719,676

- 2010 Group II Use 804,000 3.1% 0.0%

- SCF (6) or Group 2 max 1,192,000 4.7% 1,192,000 4.7%

= stocks = CSA 346,998 1.4% 610,715 2.4%

Calculate carryover

Reported as produced/imported in 2009 2,273,600 2,273,600

- Reported as sold in 2009 2,200,733 2,200,733

= Unsold carryover 72,867 72,867

Calculate new production (=CUA)

Total U.S. authorization (1) 2,055,200 8.1% 2,055,200 8.1%

- CSA (10) 346,998 1.4% 610,715 2.4%

- Carryover (13) 72,867 0.3% 72,867 0.3%

- Research 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

- uptake of alternatives 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

= New production 1,635,335 6.4% 1,371,618 5.4%

Calculate total amount allocated

CUA (14) 1,635,335 6.4% 1,371,618 5.4%

 + CSA (3) 346,998 1.4% 610,715 2.4%

= Total 1,982,333 7.8% 1,982,333 7.8%

Initial Calculation Calculation with New Inventory
### SERV:EJJ: 

### JUNE**21~** 

### 2012 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

·WASHINGTON, DC IN THEMATTER OF AIRAMBULANCE BYAIR TREK, INC. FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BEASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2011-1003 

### ORDER OF CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE LAWJUDGE EXTENDING DATE FORSUBMISSION OF STIPULATIONS OnJune 18, 2012, Respondent filed and served a Joint Request for an extension ofthe June 15,2012, date for filing stipulations. 1 

### Theparties assert that Complainant's Counsel has been traveling extensively and that this has "impeded completing a list ofstipulations."2 

### Respondent states that granting the request will not otherwise affect the schedule previously**estab~** 

### lished for this case.3 

### Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT

### 1.. For good cause shown, the deadline for filing stipulations is extended from June 15, 2012, to June 25, 2012. 

### SO ORDERED

ChiefAdministrativ.

1Joint Request for ExtensionofTime to File Stipulations at 1. 2 /d. 3 B,y Order dated March 1, 2012, theparties haduntil (1) April13, 2012 to exchange exhibits and complete discovery; (2) May 15, 2012, to exchange lists ofwitnesses and a summary ofeach witness's proposed testimony; (3) June 15, 2012to file stipulations. See Order ofChiefAdministrativeLawJudge Establishing Procedural Schedule at 1. Complainant submitted its list ofexhibits and witnesses onMay 1, 2012. 0·**3~** t• • 0CORRECTED SERVICE LIST Federal Aviation Administration 800 fudependence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591. ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-· Suite 2Wl000 4 . ONE COPY Gregory S. Winton, Respondent's Counsel The Aviation Law Firm One Research Court, Suite 450 Rockville, MD 20850 TEL: 301-294-8550 FAX: 301-294-2525Stephen W. Brice, Complainant's Counsel Office of the Regional Counsel Eastern Region, AEA-7 Federal Aviation Administration 1 AViation Plaza, Room 561 Jamaica, NY 11434 TEL: 718-553-3268 FAX: 718-533-5699

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder, Chief Administrative Law Judge U.S. Department of Transportation Office of Hearings, M-20

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2142 FAX: 202-366-7536

FDMS NO. FAA-2011-1003 (Civil Penalty Action) 4 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the folloWing address: Federal Aviation**A~ministration,** 600Jndependence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WlOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. -2-
#### § 1022.315 Exemptions.

Refer to § 1010.315 of this chapter for exemptions from the obligation to file reports of transactions in currency for money services businesses.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of HQ Sustainable Maritime Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10Q for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, JeanPierre Dallaire, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
SarbanesOxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 15, 2007



/s/ Jean-Pierre DallaireJean-Pierre DallairePrincipal Financial and Accounting Officer
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1309

To amend title 49, United States Code, to require the use of child safety

restraint systems approved by the Secretary of Transportation on commercial aircraft.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 23, 1995

Mr. LIGHTFOOT (for himself, Mr. LAZIO of New York, Mr. CLINGER, Mr.

DORNAN, Mr. LANTOS, Mrs. MEEK of Florida, Mrs. MALONEY, Mr.

NADLER, Mr. RAHALL, Mr. SCHAEFER, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. STARK, Mr.

VENTO, Mr. WELDON of Florida, and Mr. WYNN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To amend title 49, United States Code, to require the use

of child safety restraint systems approved by the Secretary of Transportation on commercial aircraft.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CHILD RESTRAINT SYSTEMS ON COMMERCIAL

4 AIRCRAFT.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 447 of title 49, United

6 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the follow7 ing new section:
2

•HR 1309 IH

1 ‘‘§ 44724. Child restraint systems

2 ‘‘Not later than 90 days after the date of the enact3 ment of this section, the Secretary shall issue regulations

4 requiring the use of child safety restraint systems ap5 proved by the Secretary on any aircraft operated by an

6 air carrier in providing interstate air transportation, intra7 state transportation, or overseas air transportation. Such

8 regulations shall establish age or weight limits for children

9 who are to use such systems.’’.

10 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

11 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding

12 at the end the following new item:

‘‘44724. Child restraint systems.’’.

13 SEC. 2. INTERNATIONAL STANDARD.

14 It is the sense of Congress that the United States

15 representative to the International Civil Aviation Organi16 zation should seek an international standard to require

17 that passengers on a civil aviation aircraft be restrained

18 on takeoff and landing and when directed by the captain

19 of such aircraft.

Æ
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

JULY 16, 2008

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 07-14900

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 06-00246-CR-CLS-HGD

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

KERI TYWARREN TARTT, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Alabama

_________________________

(July 16, 2008)

Before CARNES, BARKETT and COX, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Samuel R. Holmes, appointed counsel for Keri Tywarren Tartt, has filed a
motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent

review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of

the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals

no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and

Tartt’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Elizabeth Copeland v. Barry Copeland

Appellate case number: 01-14-00680-CV

Trial court case number: 2012-39055

Trial court: 311th District Court of Harris County

On December 19, 2014, Beth Watkins and Malanie Bragg, counsel for appellant, filed (1) 

a Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Appellant Elizabeth Copeland, and (2) an Unopposed 

Third Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief of Appellant. The motions are GRANTED.

The deadline for appellant to file a brief is extended to February 4, 2015. No further 

extensions will be granted.

In accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.5(c), withdrawing counsel for 

appellant Elizabeth Copeland is ORDERED to immediately notify appellant, in writing, of the 

granting of this motion to withdraw, the extension of the deadline to file a brief, and any other 

deadlines or settings that have not previously been disclosed to appellant. A copy of that written 

notice is to be filed with the Clerk of this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(c). 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: __/s/ Rebeca Huddle

X Acting individually 

Date: December 30, 2014
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 245.1 Introductory. This part governs the issuance of replacement checks for checks drawn on the United States Treasury, when ( a ) The original check has been lost, stolen, destroyed or mutilated or defaced to such an extent that it is rendered non-negotiable;
( b ) The original check has been negotiated and paid on a forged or unauthorized indorsement, and
( c ) The original check has been cancelled pursuant to § 204.4 of this chapter.
EXHIBIT 10.1


 


[TRANSLATION FROM HEBREW]


 


STATE OF ISRAEL


 


 


MINISTRY OF ENERGY AND WATER


LICENSING AUTHORITY NATURAL RESOURCES


 


Oil and Gas


12 August 2012


Oil_688_2012


 





	Mr Richard Rinberg,CEO
 Zion Oil & Gas, Inc
 22 Bareket Northern Industrial Zone
 Caesarea 38900	Fax: 04/6231427







 


Dear Sir


 


Re: Joseph License/339- Extending the Validity 


Your letter dated July 17, 2012


 


In view of your above mentioned request, I hereby extend the
above referenced license for an additional year up to April 10, 2013. During the extension period your company shall execute the
following work program:


 


		a.	Obtain the seismic survey, process the data and submit
the process report and ancillary material to the National archives at the Geophysics Institute as defined in the guidelines for
transferring seismic data, by October 15, 2012.



		b.	Interpret the new seismic survey and integrate the
data with old seismic lines, update the geophysical maps and submit a geophysical summary report by December 15, 2012.



		c.	Identify and prepare a drilling prospectus that includes
a description of the geological background, the purposes and desired drilling depths and the petroleum system/s that are related
therein and a geological forecast and engineering plan for the proposed drilling by January 15,2013.



		d.	Execute a contract with a drilling contractor to drill
a new well or drill the existing well by - 15 February 2013.



 


 


 


Alexander Varshavsky


Commissioner of Petroleum Affairs