alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 316.9 Taxation. ( a ) *General.* For the purpose of determining taxes and tax exemptions, the increment in value represented by the difference between the price paid for Series E bonds and the redemption value received therefor constitutes interest. Such interest is subject to all taxes imposed under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The bonds are subject to estate, inheritance, gift, or other excise taxes, whether Federal or State, but are exempt from all other taxation now or hereafter imposed on the principal or interest thereof by any State, or any of the possessions of the United States, or by any local taxing authority.
( b ) *Federal income tax on bonds.* An owner of Series E bonds who is a cash-basis taxpayer may use either of the following two methods of reporting the increase in the redemption value of the bonds for Federal income tax purposes: ( 1 ) Defer reporting the increase to the year of final maturity, actual redemption, or other disposition, whichever is earlier; or
( 2 ) Elect to report the increases each year as they accrue, in which case the election applies to all Series E bonds then owned and those subsequently acquired, as well as to any other similar obligations purchased on a discount basis. If the method in paragraph (b)(1) of this section is used, the taxpayer may change to the method in paragraph (b)(2) of this section without obtaining permission from the Internal Revenue Service. However, once the election to use the method in paragraph (b)(2) of this section is made, the taxpayer may not change the method of reporting without permission from the Internal Revenue Service. For further information on Federal income taxes, the Service Center Director, or District Director, Internal Revenue Service, of the taxpayer's district may be contacted.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 131 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                               H. R. 131

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the child care 
    credit for lower-income working parents, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

 Mr. Solomon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the child care 
    credit for lower-income working parents, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Child Care Tax Credit Reform Act of 
1995''.

SEC. 2. CHILD CARE CREDIT AMENDMENTS.

    (a) Increase in Amount of Employment-Related Expenses Taken Into 
Account.--
            (1) 1 qualifying individual.--Paragraph (1) of section 
        21(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to dollar 
        limit on amount creditable) is amended by striking ``$2,400'' 
        and inserting ``$3,600''.
            (2) 2 or more qualifying individuals.--Paragraph (2) of 
        section 21(c) of such Code (relating to dollar limit on amount 
        creditable) is amended by striking ``$4,800'' and inserting 
        ``$5,400''.
    (b) Denial of Credit to Taxpayers Whose Adjusted Gross Income is 
$50,000 or More.--Paragraph (2) of section 21(a) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (defining applicable percentage) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(but not below 20 percent)'' and 
        inserting ``(but not below zero)'', and
            (2) by striking ``1 percentage point for each $2,000 (or 
        fraction thereof)'' and inserting ``1\1/2\ percentage points 
        for each full $2,000''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1995.
                                 <all>
```
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****The Medical Department.**
 
Parts: One | Two | Three | Four
 
SuDoc Number:D 114.7:M 46/
Item Number:0345 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000929659
 
January 12, 2018
- Office Home
- About Us
- What We Do

HomeOffice of Security Assistance...About Us – Office of Security Assistance

# 									About Us							

Office of Security Assistance

Bureau of Political-Military Affairs

The Office of Security Assistance (SA) has two core functions: (1) managing State Department Title 22 military grant assistance – to include directing approximately $6.5 billion in annual Foreign Military Financing (FMF), International Military Education and Training (IMET), and Peacekeeping Operations (PKO) funding for allies and partners through policy development, budget formulation, and program oversight, and (2) jointly formulating programs and managing Secretary of State concurrence and coordination for more than twenty different Department of Defense (DoD) Title 10 authorities worth approximately $15 million annually.

PM/SA is comprised of four teams.  Three teams oversee regional and bilateral security assistance programs, with one team responsible for East Asia and the Pacific (EAP) and South and Central Asia (SCA), one for Africa (AF) and the Western Hemisphere (WHA), and one for Europe and Eurasia (EUR) and the Near East (NEA).  The EAP/SCA/Title 10 team also facilitates office and Department-wide input into DoD security cooperation programs and fields DoD requests for Secretary of State concurrence and coordination.  The AF/WHA/PKO team provides overall strategic planning and budgetary oversight for the global PKO account.  The Global Strategy and Oversight team is responsible for providing cross-cutting, global policy guidance and budget oversight for the FMF and IMET accounts; developing and implementing global programs; and conducting FMF and IMET assessment, monitoring, and evaluation (AM&E) activities.

Director:  Greg HermsmeyerOffice contact number:  202-663-3040

Tags

Bureau of Political-Military AffairsPolitical-Military Cooperation

Back to Top
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             809
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,518
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,489
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,460
<PP&E>                                           7,614
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,456
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,828
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,656
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        38,624
<OTHER-SE>                                         615
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,828
<SALES>                                         21,387
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,387
<CGS>                                            8,380
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,391
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   450
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 354
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,632
<INCOME-TAX>                                        86
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,546
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,546
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17


</TABLE>
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1225

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to exempt employees

who perform certain court reporting duties from the compensatory time

requirements applicable to certain public agencies, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 14, 1995

Mr. FAWELL (for himself, Mr. BARRETT of Nebraska, Mr. ANDREWS, Mr.

HOEKSTRA, and Mr. CHRISTENSEN) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities

A BILL

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to exempt

employees who perform certain court reporting duties

from the compensatory time requirements applicable to

certain public agencies, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘The Court Reporter

5 Fair Labor Amendments of 1995’’.
2

•HR 1225 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON COMPENSATORY TIME FOR COURT

2 REPORTERS.

3 Section 7(o) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938

4 (29 U.S.C. 207(o)) is amended—

5 (1) by redesignating paragraph (6) as para6 graph (7); and

7 (2) by inserting after paragraph (5) the follow8 ing new paragraph:

9 ‘‘(6) A public agency may not be considered to be

10 in violation of subsection (a) with respect to an employee

11 who performs court reporting transcript preparation du12 ties if such public agency and such employee have an un13 derstanding that the time spent performing such duties

14 outside of normal working hours or regular working days

15 is not considered as hours worked for the purposes of sub16 section (a).’’.

17 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE OF AMENDMENTS.

18 The amendments made by section 2 shall take effect

19 as if included in the provisions of the Fair Labor Stand20 ards Act of 1938 to which such amendments relate, except

21 that such amendments shall not apply to an action—

22 (1) that was brought in a court involving the

23 application of section 7(a) of such Act to an em24 ployee who performed court reporting transcript

25 preparation duties; and
3

•HR 1225 IH

1 (2) in which a final judgment has been entered

2 on or before the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
**Section	333	Exemption	Request**

**Operator	Name:** Jesse	Hammett **Operator	Address:** 504	Lakewinds	Blvd

Inman,	SC	29349 **Reason	for	Exemption	Request:** To	be	able	to	continue	to	provide	drone videography	services	to	clients. **Safety	Precautions:** The	operator	will	maintain	an	equivalent	level	of	safety	by always	being	aware	of	surroundings,	keeping	within	line	of	sight	of	the	aircraft,	and informing	people	in	the	area	of	the	presence	of	the	aircraft. **Public	Interest:** Granting	the	exemption	would	b e	in	the	public	interest	because	it would	allow	the	operator	to	provide	commercial	videography	services	to	clients, adding	value	to	the	American	economy. **Proposed	Operations:** Drone	videography	services	for	clients. **Aircraft	Make	and	Model:** DJI	Phantom	3	Professional
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 66 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 66

 Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States with 
 respect to the number of terms of office of Members of the Senate and 
                       House of Representatives.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 27, 1995

   Mr. Deal of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Minge, Mr. Meehan, and Mr. 
Kingston) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States with 
 respect to the number of terms of office of Members of the Senate and 
                       House of Representatives.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each house 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years from the date of its submission by the Congress:

                              ``Article--

    ``No person who has been elected to the Senate two times shall be 
eligible for election or appointment to the Senate. No person who has 
been elected to the House of Representatives six times shall be 
eligible for election to the House of Representatives. A State may 
establish limitations on the length of service for Members of Congress 
from that State provided said limitations do not exceed the limits set 
forth in this article.''.
                                 <all>
```
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Advancing the Minerals Security Partnership with Argentina and the Private Sector

# 									Advancing the Minerals Security Partnership with Argentina and the Private Sector							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

May 11, 2023

To advance the goals of the Minerals Security Partnership (MSP), a collaboration of 13 governments to catalyze public and private investment in critical mineral supply chains globally, Under Secretary Jose W. Fernandez convened an online discussion with Argentine Secretary of Mining María Fernanda Ávila, international private sector representatives, and MSP partners to discuss critical minerals projects in Argentina.  This meeting served to familiarize MSP partners and the private sector with Argentina’s critical minerals sector and projects of potential interest for investment and support.  Engagements like these help promote the clean energy transition, further mobilizing resources towards diversifying mineral supply chains and advancing the Biden Administration’s priority of regional collaboration on securing responsible and sustainable minerals.

To learn more about MSP, visit https://www.state.gov/minerals-security-partnership/.  For press inquiries, contact: E_Communications@state.gov. Stay updated by following Under Secretary Fernandez on Twitter: @State_E, Facebook: @StateDeptE, and LinkedIn: @State-E.

Tags

ArgentinaBureau of Energy ResourcesBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsEnergyInvestmentsOffice of the Spokesperson

## Related Articles

-  											 									
Read more
 

Back to Top
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 339.2 Denominations.

Series H bonds, available for use hereunder, are in denominations of $500, $1,000, $5,000 and $10,000.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 250.1 Scope of regulations.

The regulations in this part govern payment by the Department of the Treasury on awards made and certified to the Secretary of the Treasury by the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission under the International Claims Settlement Act of 1949, as amended (22 U.S.C. 1621 *et seq.*), and Title II of the War Claims Act of 1948 (50 U.S.C. App. 2017 *et seq.*).

[34 FR 1897, Feb. 8, 1969]
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Angola Presidential Elections

# 									Angola Presidential Elections							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

September 9, 2022

We congratulate President-elect Joao Lourenco on his election as Angola’s next president. We look forward to working with him to strengthen the vital relationship between Angola and the United States. We will continue to collaborate closely with the Angolan government and the Angolan people to promote our shared goals as we work together to advance a more sustainable, secure, inclusive, and prosperous future.

We commend the millions of Angolan voters who cast their ballots in this election, and in doing so demonstrated their commitment to strengthening democracy. We look forward to working in partnership with Angola’s elected leaders to forge a better tomorrow for all Angolans and Americans.

Tags

AngolaBureau of African AffairsDemocracyElectionsOffice of the SpokespersonThe Secretary of State

Back to Top
#### Joseph Kilroy, Appellant, v S.K. Kum Gang San New York, Inc., et al., Defendants, and S.K. New York, Inc., Respondent. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[806 NYS2d 618]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Glover, J.), dated June 1, 2004, as granted the cross motion of the defendant S.K. New York, Inc., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is modified by deleting the provision thereof granting that branch of the cross motion which was to dismiss the cause of action pursuant to Labor Law § 240 (1) insofar as asserted against S.K. New York, Inc., and substituting therefor a provision denying that branch of the cross mo*529tion; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant S.K. New York, Inc. (hereinafter SKNY), failed to establish its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law with respect to the plaintiffs cause of action pursuant to Labor Law § 240 (1). The showing of SKNY with respect to the placement of the scaffold in relation to the ditch and the adjacent pile of dirt onto which the plaintiff allegedly had to jump in order to descend from the scaffold was insufficient to establish that the plaintiffs injury was not caused by the kind of elevation-related risk contemplated by the statute *(see Desousa v City of New York,*267 AD2d 195 [1999]; *Binetti v MK W. St. Co.,*239 AD2d 214 [1997]), or that the plaintiffs actions in jumping onto the dirt mound were the sole proximate cause of the accident *(cf. Blake v Neighborhood Hous. Servs. of N.Y. City,*1 NY3d 280, 289-292 [2003]; *George v State of New York,*251 AD2d 541, 542 [1998]).

The plaintiffs remaining contentions are without merit. Cozier, J.P., Ritter, Spolzino and Lunn, JJ., concur.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-1726

_____________________________

STEVEN DAWAYNE BANKS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

John F. Simon, Jr., Judge.

April 16, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, RAY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Steven Dawayne Banks, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 315.51 Requests for reissue.

A request for reissue of bonds in coownership form during the lifetime of the coowners must be signed by both coowners, except that a request solely to eliminate the name of one coowner may be signed by that coowner only. A bond registered in beneficiary form may be reissued upon the request of the owner, supported by the certified consent of the beneficiary or by proof of his or her death. Fiscal Service forms are available for requesting reissue.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 205.29 What are the State oversight and compliance responsibilities? ( a ) A State must designate an official representative with the statutory or administrative authority to coordinate all interaction with the Federal government concerning this subpart A, and must notify us in writing of the representative's name and title. A State must notify us immediately of any change in the official representative.
( b ) A State must maintain records supporting interest calculations, clearance patterns, Interest Calculation Costs, and other functions directly pertinent to the implementation and administration of this subpart A for audit purposes. A State must retain the records for each fiscal year for three years from the date the State submits its Annual Report, or until any pending dispute or action involving the records and documents is completed, whichever is later. We, the Comptroller General, and the Inspector General or other representative of a Federal Program Agency must have the right of access to, and may require submission of, all records for the purpose of verifying interest calculations, clearance patterns, interest calculation cost claims, and the State's accounting for Federal funds.
( c ) A State's implementation of this subpart A is subject to audit in accordance with 31 U.S.C. Chapter 75, “Requirements for Single Audits.”
( d ) If a State repeatedly or deliberately fails to request funds in accordance with the procedures established for its funding techniques, as set forth in § 205.11, § 205.12, or a Treasury-State agreement, we may deny the State payment or credit for the resulting Federal interest liability, notwithstanding any other provision of this part.
( e ) If a State materially fails to comply with this subpart A, we may, in addition to the action described in paragraph (d) of this section, take one or more of the following actions, as appropriate under the circumstances: ( 1 ) Deny the reimbursement of all or a part of the State's interest calculation cost claim;
( 2 ) Send notification of the non-compliance to the affected Federal Program Agency for appropriate action, including, where appropriate, a determination regarding the impact of non-compliance on program funding;
( 3 ) Request a Federal Program Agency or the General Accounting Office to conduct an audit of the State to determine interest owed to the Federal government, and to implement procedures to recover such interest;
( 4 ) Initiate a debt collection process to recover claims owed to the United States; or
( 5 ) Take other remedies legally available.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-14-0000336 24-JUN-2015 08:26 AM