alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Francis H. Leggett *et*al., Respondents, *against*Annie E. Cochrane *et*al., Appellants.

(Decided December 5th, 1881.)

The payee of a promissory note cannot sustain an action on the note against an indorser who stands apparently in the place of a second indorser, where it does not appear that the latter indorsed the note before its delivery to the payee, nor that he indorsed it at the request of the maker, and there is no other evidence that the indorsement was made to give the maker credit with the payee.

Appeal from a judgment of the district court in the City of New York for the Sixth Judicial District.

The action was brought to recover the amount of three promissory notes, made by the defendant Cochrane to the order of the plaintiffs, and indorsed by the defendant Walker. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiffs against both the defendants. From the judgment the defendant Walker appealed to this court.

*H. Hoyt,*for appellant.

*J. B. Lord,*for respondent.

J. F. Daly, J.

The action was by the payees of the notes against one who stood apparently in the place of a second in*271dorser, but no evidence was given to show that he indorsed the notes to give the maker credit with the payee, which alone would entitle the latter to recover against him *(Moore*v. *Cross,*19 N. Y. 227). The notes in this case were not indorsed l?y the payees, and when the defendant Walker indorsed them he saw and knew that fact of course; but that does not in itself show any right in the payees to recover against Walker. It does not appear that the latter indorsed the notes before they were delivered to the payees; nor that he indorsed them at the request of the maker. The case is barren, in fact, of any proof of the transaction.

Respondent contends, under *Hall*v. *Newcomb*(7 Hill, 420), that the payee may indorse “ without recourse,” and the note being thus payable to bearer, he may, as such, recover upon it like any other holder, against all the parties. But the authority cited states that the payee may so indorse *“*without recourse” and recover against the other indorser, in two cases, viz.: “ Where such a note is presented to the *accommodation indorser*and is indorsed by him without having been previously indorsed by the person to whose order the same is made payable,” and where *“*the object of the second indorser was to enable the drawer to obtain money from the payee of the note.” It will be seen that even when the note is not indorsed by the payee when presented to the other indorser, the latter must be shown to be an accommodation indorser. It is not to be presumed from the indorsement. As the payee claims the right to make the restrictive indorsement now, or to have the court regard it as having been made, he is bound to support his right by proof that Walker is an accommodation indorsor. In the language of the learned court in *Moore*v. Cross, such indorsement may be made “ if a right to so indorse appears ” (p. 230).

The judgment must be reversed, with costs.

Wait Hoesen, J., concurred.

Judgment reversed, with costs.;
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Protein Polymer Technologies,
     Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003
     as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
     (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
     Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
     of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.



     /s/ J. Thomas Parmeter
     ----------------------
     J. Thomas Parmeter
     President and Chief Executive Officer
     May 13, 2003
HomeAssisted Schools...Nouakchott, Mauritania: American International School of Nouakchott: 2024 Special Needs Profile

# 									Nouakchott, Mauritania: American International School of Nouakchott: 2024 Special Needs Profile							

Special Needs Profile

Office of Overseas Schools

April 4, 2024

## 								School Contact Information							

        -  Tel: +222-4525-2967 | Overseas Schools Fact Sheet | Acting Regional Education Officer: Tim Stuart 
        -  E-mail: director@aisnmauritania.com | Website: www.aisnmauritania.com| “Our small school is open to working students with needs; however, our most successful plans include digital support from speech and other learning support professionals through Zoom.” –AISN Representative 
        -  Additional details on special needs support at post found on the **School Summary Information Portal**(must have OKTA login to access).  For more information, contact A/OPR/OS (**overseasschools@state.gov** / +1-202-261-8200), MED/CFP Child and Family Program Team (**MEDCFP@state.gov**/ +1-202-663-1815), or the school directly.    

**Download the Special Needs Profile** (Nouakchott- 2024 Special Needs- Mauritania) for this school to learn more about their capability to support students with exceptionalities.

The **American International School of Nouakchott**(AISN), founded in 1978, is a nonprofit, private, coeducational day school that offers an educational program to students from pre-K through grade 12. The school year runs from August through June.

*This is intended to provide general information. Prospective users of the schools may wish to inquire further of A/OPR/OS or contact the school directly for more specific and up-to-the-minute information. Information and statistics are current as of December 2023 and provided by the school.*

NOTE: School situations can change quickly, particularly as schools face cutbacks to learning support programs due to the pandemic, unrest, and economic uncertainty. For the most current information, work with the REO and school. Information in this document was collected by the Department of State’s Office of Overseas Schools directly from the school in December 2023 and shows the availability of services rather than an assessment of the quality of the services. The profile is intended as a jumping off point for a conversation with the REO and school to understand the best fit for your child. Definitions may vary school to school.

Tags

MauritaniaOffice of Overseas Schools

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 328.8 Loss, theft, or destruction of securities bearing restrictive endorsements. ( a ) *General.* Relief will be provided on account of securities bearing restrictive endorsements proved to have been lost, stolen or destroyed, upon the owner's application, in the same manner as registered securities which have not been assigned. (See subpart N of the current revision of Department Circular No. 300, the general regulations governing United States securities.) Except for bearer securities submitted for redemption at par in payment of Federal estate taxes, a bank will be considered the owner of securities handled on behalf of customers unless it otherwise requests. The application for relief (Form PD 2211) and instructions will be furnished by the Federal Reserve banks.
( b ) *Bond of indemnity.* Where securities bearing restrictive endorsements shipped by a bank have been lost, stolen, or destroyed, a bond of indemnity with surety satisfactory to the Secretary of the Treasury will be required from the owner. If such bond is executed by a bank or other corporation, the execution must be authorized by general or special resolution of the board of directors, or other body exercising similar functions under its bylaws. Ordinarily, no surety will be required on a bond executed by a presenting bank. The Secretary of the Treasury reserves the right, however, to require a surety in any case in which he considers such action necessary for the protection of the United States.
From: Buckingham, Wendy [mailto:wendy.buckingham@HQ.DHS.GOV]

Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 9:06 AM

To: Buckingham, Wendy

Subject: National Consultation Proposed DHS Supplemental Ethics Regulation

From: Livoti, Carmen

Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 8:47 AM

To: 'ncrinbox@afge.org'

Cc: David Cann; Candace Archer

Subject: National Consultation Proposed DHS Supplemental Ethics Regulation

Dear Mr. Cox

The Department of Homeland Security’s proposed Supplemental Ethics Regulation i s hereby provided in

accordance with 5 U.S.C. § 7113(b)(1). Please provide your comments and/or recommendations to me by

April 13, 2015. If you have any questions or require further information, please contact me. You can

reach me at 202

- 357

- 8175 and vi a e

- mail at carmen.livoti@hq.dhs.gov

.

Respectfully,

Carmen Livoti

Senior Labor & Employee Relations Advisor

MGMT/OCHCO/ HCPP

U.S. Department of Homeland Security

202

- 357

- 8175/202

- 573

- 3445(bb)
exv10w2xby



 






Exhibit 10.2(b)




AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




        THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of March 5, 2007, by and
between MetroPCS Texas, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Company”), and J. Braxton
Carter, II, an individual (the “Executive”).



        WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive have entered into that certain Employment Agreement,
dated March 31, 2005 (the “Agreement”);



        WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Agreement as as set forth below.



        NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the respective covenants and promises
contained herein, and for other goods and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which are hereby acknowledged, the parties, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree to amend
the Agreement as follows:


1.     For purposes of this Amendment, all capitalized terms used herein which are not defined herein
shall have the meanings ascribed to such capitalized terms in the Agreement.



2.     In the heading for Section 2.5.3, delete the words “Non-Renewal” in their entirety.



3.     In Section 2.5.3, delete the last paragraph in its entirety and substitute the
following:





	      	 	If Executive terminates Executive’s employment for Good Reason then (i) the Company’s
obligations under this Agreement shall immediately cease, (ii) all vesting of vested stock
options, if any, shall immediately cease as of the date of the termination, and (iii)
Executive shall be entitled to receive payment of the aggregate amount of (A) Executive’s
Base Salary then earned but unpaid; (B) bonus, if any, pursuant to the terms of the
Company’s Bonus Plan; (C) vested benefits, if any, under any employee benefit plan
applicable to Executive; (D) any other benefits earned, accrued, and unpaid prior to the
date of termination; and (E) unreimbursed expenses, if any, incurred by Executive as of the
date of such termination. In addition, subject to Executive’s execution of a General
Release, Executive shall be entitled to severance and the Option Extension, each as
provided in Section 2.5.2 hereof, if Executive resigns for Good Reason. Such
payment shall be paid to Executive in a lump sum and shall commence only in accordance with
the terms of the General Release.
















 






4.     Except as expressly modified or amended herein, the Agreement shall remain unmodified
and in full force and effect.




        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Employment Agreement to be executed on
the date first written above.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	“COMPANY”

MetroPCS Texas, LLC


	 
	 	By:  	/s/  Roger D. Linquist	 
	 	Name:  Roger D. Linquist 	 	 
	 	Title:    President/COB & CEO 	 
	 


	 	“EXECUTIVE”


	 
	 	/s/  J. Braxton Carter, II	 
	 	J. Braxton Carter, II
1 

### B E C K H A M , L I SA S u b j ec t: A Z NS R R ul es L o c a t io n: Te l ec o nf e r e n ce , 866

- 299

- 3188 , C o d e 257

- 6554 S t a r t: T hu 2 / 26 / 2015 10 : 00 AM E nd: T hu 2 / 26 / 2015 10 : 30 AM S h o w Ti me A s: Te nt a ti ve R ec u rre n ce: (n o n e) M ee t i ng S t a tu s: N o t y e t r e s po nd ed Or g a n i z er: B E C KH AM , LISA R e qu i re d Att e nd ee s: St e v e B urr; R9

- C o nfLin e - Ca rd 1

- A I R

_ O nl y /C o nf

- Lin e/ R e gi o n - 9

- R ES T R I CT ED R e s o u rce s: R 9

- Roo m - 1819

- 8

- R ac h e l Ca r s o n / R e gi o n -9



### H i S te v e – I w o u l d lik e t o g i v e y o u a fi n al upd a t e o n w h e r e w e a r e w i t h o u r p a ck a g e . N o t h i ng y o u n e e d t o r e v i e w i n a d v a n c e . I ’ m p r et t y fr e e t o mo r r o w – s o f ee l fr e e t o s u gg e s t a d iff e r e n t t i m e – o r m a y e v e n e arl y o n F ri d a y .
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
  /s/ Donald M. Earhart
 
 /s/ James R. Talevich
HomeAssisted Schools...Ashgabat, Turkmenistan: Ashgabat International School: 2024 Special Needs Profile

# 									Ashgabat, Turkmenistan: Ashgabat International School: 2024 Special Needs Profile							

Special Needs Profile

Office of Overseas Schools

February 29, 2024

## 								School Contact Information							

        -  Tel: +993-12-48-9027 | Overseas Schools Fact Sheet | Acting Regional Education Officer: Andrew Hoover 
        -  E-mail: ashgabat@qsi.org | Website: www.ashgabat.qsi.org| 
        -  Additional details on special needs support at post found on the **School Summary Information Portal**(must have OKTA login to access).  For more information, contact A/OPR/OS (**overseasschools@state.gov** / +1-202-261-8200), MED/CFP Child and Family Program Team (**MEDCFP@state.gov**/ +1-202-663-1815), or the school directly. 

 

**Special Needs**: Download the Special Needs Profile (Ashgabat 2024 Special Needs Profile Turkmenistan [190 KB]) for this school to learn more about their capability to support students with exceptionalities.

Founded in 1994, **Ashgabat International School** (AIS) is a non-profit U.S. accredited school offering educational programs from age two through High School. The 180-day school year extends from August to mid-June and includes a one-week fall break, a three-week winter break, a one-week spring break and observes Turkmen holidays. Status reports are distributed to parents five times per year at the completion of each quintile.

*This is intended to provide general information. Prospective users of the schools may wish to inquire further of A/OPR/OS or contact the school directly for more specific and up-to-the-minute information. Information and statistics are current as of December 2023 and provided by the school.*

NOTE: School situations can change quickly, particularly as schools face cutbacks to learning support programs due to the pandemic, unrest, and economic uncertainty. For the most current information, work with the REO and school. Information in this document was collected by the Department of State’s Office of Overseas Schools directly from the school in December 2023 and shows the availability of services rather than an assessment of the quality of the services. The profile is intended as a jumping off point for a conversation with the REO and school to understand the best fit for your child. Definitions may vary school to school.

Tags

Office of Overseas SchoolsTurkmenistan

Back to Top
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 212.4 Initial action upon receipt of a garnishment order. ( a ) *Examination of order for Notice of Right to Garnish Federal Benefits.* Prior to taking any other action related to a garnishment order issued against a debtor, and no later than two business days following receipt of the order, a financial institution shall examine the order to determine if the United States or a State child support enforcement agency has attached or included a Notice of Right to Garnish Federal Benefits, as set forth in Appendix B to this part.
( b ) *Notice of Right to Garnish Federal Benefits is attached to or included with the order.* If a Notice of Right to Garnish Federal Benefits is attached to or included with the garnishment order, then the financial institution shall follow its otherwise customary procedures for handling the order and shall not follow the procedures in § 212.5 and § 212.6.
( c ) *No Notice of Right to Garnish Federal Benefits.* If a Notice of Right to Garnish Federal Benefits is not attached to or included with the garnishment order, then the financial institution shall follow the procedures in § 212.5 and § 212.6.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 158 (Tuesday, August 18, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 41740]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19756]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLCAN00000.L18200000.XZ0000]


Notice of Public Meeting: Northeast California Resource Advisory 
Council

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Public Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
of 1976 (FLPMA), and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), 
the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) 
Northeast California Resource Advisory Council will meet as indicated 
below.

DATES: The RAC will meet Wednesday and Thursday, Sept. 9 and 10, 2009, 
at the BLM Eagle Lake Field Office, 2950 Riverside Dr., Susanville, 
Calif. On Sept. 9, the council meets at 10 a.m. for a field tour of 
public lands managed by the Eagle Lake Field Office. Members of the 
public are welcome; they must provide their own transportation and 
lunch. On Sept. 10, the meeting begins at 8 a.m. in the Conference Room 
of the Eagle Lake Field Office, and is open to the public. Public 
comments will be heard at 11 a.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Haug, BLM Northern California 
District manager, (530) 221-1743; or BLM Public Affairs Officer Joseph 
J. Fontana, (530) 252-5332.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 15-member council advises the Secretary 
of the Interior, through the BLM, on a variety of planning and 
management issues associated with public land management in Northeast 
California and the northwest corner of Nevada. At this meeting, agenda 
topics an update on the proposed Kramer Ranch land exchange, a status 
report on alternative energy development proposals, an update on 
American Reinvestment and Recovery Act projects, a discussion of a 
sage-grouse translocation project, and updates from managers of the BLM 
Alturas, Eagle Lake and Surprise field offices. Members of the public 
may present written comments to the council. Each formal council 
meeting will have time allocated for public comments. Depending on the 
number of persons wishing to speak, and the time available, the time 
for individual comments may be limited. Members of the public are 
welcome on field tours, but they must provide their own transportation 
and lunch. Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, 
such as sign language interpretation and other reasonable 
accommodations, should contact the BLM as provided above.

    Dated: August 10, 2009.
Joseph J. Fontana,
Public Affairs Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-19756 Filed 8-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-P
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Jesus Jose Lacer v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-17-00267-CR

Trial court case number: 44479

Trial court: 33rd District Court of Burnet County

On November 21, 2017, the Court issued an order noting that certain exhibits, marked by 

the official court reporter as follows, were not included as part of the reporter’s record forwarded 

to this Court on appeal.

1. Defendant’s sealed Exhibit 2 (video recording containing pornographic material);

2. Defendant’s sealed Exhibit 3 (video recording containing pornographic material).

Thus, we ordered the District Clerk of Burnet County or the court reporter, if the exhibits 

were still in her possession, to deliver to the Clerk of this Court the original above described sealed 

exhibits. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c), 34.5(f), 34.6(d), 34.6(g). The District Clerk of Burnet 

County or the court reporter was also directed to include a copy of the trial court’s order sealing 

Defendant’s Exhibits 2 and 3. The court reporter has now notified the Court that she filed the 

above described sealed exhibits with the District Clerk of Burnet County and no longer has access 

to them.

Accordingly, we again ORDER the District Clerk of Burnet County to deliver to the Clerk 

of this Court the original above described sealed exhibits. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c), 34.5(f), 

34.6(d), 34.6(g). The District Clerk of Burnet County should also include a copy of the trial court’s 

order sealing Defendant’s Exhibits 2 and 3.

The Clerk of this Court is directed to receive, maintain, and keep safe the original sealed

exhibits; to deliver them to the justices of this Court for their inspection; and, upon completion of 

inspection, to return the originals of the above described sealed exhibits to the District Clerk of 

Burnet County.

The sealed exhibits shall be filed in the First Court of Appeals within 5 days of the date 
of this order. If the District Clerk of Burnet County is unable to file the sealed exhibits within 5 

days, the District Clerk is directed to file an information sheet or certified statement informing the 

Court of the status of the exhibits.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: January 11, 2018
#### § 19.1000 Respondent.

*Respondent* means a person against whom an agency has initiated a debarment or suspension action.