alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                     SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                24,287
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              0
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     133,226
<PP&E>                                                93,934
<DEPRECIATION>                                        55,013
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    14,768,735
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              3,211,036
<BONDS>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                               14
<COMMON>                                               6,149
<OTHER-SE>                                        11,551,536
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      14,768,735
<SALES>                                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           0
<CGS>                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   6,355,388
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       1,721
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   (2,197)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (6,354,912)
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (6,354,912)
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (6,354,912)
<EPS-BASIC>                                            (.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (.44)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial 
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for P-B Capital Return Futures Fund 3, L.P.
                    and is qualified in its entirety by reference
                    to such financial statements
</LEGEND>

<RESTATED>          
<CIK>               0000857850
<NAME>              P-B Capital Return Futures Fund 3, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>        1

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1997

<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-1-1997

<PERIOD-END>                    Sep-30-1997

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS

<CASH>                          18,734,248

<SECURITIES>                    167,775

<RECEIVABLES>                   0

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                18,902,023

<PP&E>                          0

<DEPRECIATION>                  0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  18,902,023

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           805,168

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      18,096,855

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    18,902,023

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                408,510

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                2,087,983

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    (1,679,473)

<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (14.75)

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 245.4 Advice of nonreceipt or loss. ( a ) In the event of the nonreceipt, loss or destruction of a check drawn on the United States Treasury, or the mutilation or defacement of such a check to an exent which renders it nonnegotiable, the claimant should immediately notify the agency that authorized the issuance of such check, describing the check, stating the purpose for which it was issued and giving, if possible, its date, amount, Treasury symbol and number.
( b ) In cases involving mutiliated or defaced checks, the claimant should enclose the mutilated or defaced check with his communication to the agency.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Acting Special Coordinator for the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment Matza’s Travel to Angola, Zambia, DRC, and Belgium

# 									Acting Special Coordinator for the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment Matza’s Travel to Angola, Zambia, DRC, and Belgium							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

October 16, 2023

Acting Special Coordinator for the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment (PGI) Helaina Matza will travel to Luanda, Angola; Lusaka, Zambia; Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of the Congo; and Brussels, Belgium October 16-26 to advance ongoing PGI-led investments developing the Lobito Corridor and the Zambia-Lobito greenfield railway—a transformative economic link connecting the African continent from west to east via rail through the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Zambia and Angola.

During her trip, Acting Special Coordinator Matza will also attend the European Union’s Global Gateway Forum which will bring together government representatives, the private sector, civil society members, financing institutions, and international organizations to discuss global infrastructure investment and opportunities for collaboration.

Tags

AngolaBelgiumBureau of African AffairsBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsDemocratic Republic of the CongoOffice of the SpokespersonOffice of the U.S. Special Coordinator for the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and InvestmentZambia

Back to Top
| 1. | Such      Quarter Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,      2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in such Quarter Report on Form 10-Q for      the period ending September 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      Birch Branch, Inc. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Date:        November 15, 2010   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|   |                                       |
|   | /s/ Wang      Feng                         |
|   | Wang      FengChief      Executive Officer |
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by T.D. 9359, 72 FR 54544, Sept. 26, 2007.

§ 10.28 Return of client's records. ( a ) In general, a practitioner must, at the request of a client, promptly return any and all records of the client that are necessary for the client to comply with his or her Federal tax obligations. The practitioner may retain copies of the records returned to a client. The existence of a dispute over fees generally does not relieve the practitioner of his or her responsibility under this section. Nevertheless, if applicable state law allows or permits the retention of a client's records by a practitioner in the case of a dispute over fees for services rendered, the practitioner need only return those records that must be attached to the taxpayer's return. The practitioner, however, must provide the client with reasonable access to review and copy any additional records of the client retained by the practitioner under state law that are necessary for the client to comply with his or her Federal tax obligations.
( b ) For purposes of this section, *Records of the client* include all documents or written or electronic materials provided to the practitioner, or obtained by the practitioner in the course of the practitioner's representation of the client, that preexisted the retention of the practitioner by the client. The term also includes materials that were prepared by the client or a third party (not including an employee or agent of the practitioner) at any time and provided to the practitioner with respect to the subject matter of the representation. The term also includes any return, claim for refund, schedule, affidavit, appraisal or any other document prepared by the practitioner, or his or her employee or agent, that was presented to the client with respect to a prior representation if such document is necessary for the taxpayer to comply with his or her current Federal tax obligations. The term does not include any return, claim for refund, schedule, affidavit, appraisal or any other document prepared by the practitioner or the practitioner's firm, employees or agents if the practitioner is withholding such document pending the client's performance of its contractual obligation to pay fees with respect to such document.
20

40

60

80

100

Concentration (ppb)

Los Angeles South Coast Air Basin

Annual NAAQS (53 ppb)

US EPA REGION 9 AIR QUALITY TRENDS, 1970-2012

ANNUAL NITROGEN DIOXIDE (NO2) DESIGN VALUE CONCENTRATIONS BY 

DESIGNATED AREA

Source: US EPA's Air Quality Systems (AQS) database (July 11, 2012 and June 25, 2013; last updated July 15, 2013).

The 1971 primary national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for annual NO2 is 53 parts per billion (ppb). The annual primary standard NO2 design value for a 

site is the valid annual mean recorded value. For annual NO2 design values, X-axis labels represent the design value year. All exceptional event data (e.g., high winds 

and wildfires) that EPA has concurred on have been excluded from design value calculations. An adequate monitoring network is not yet in place to measure for the 

2010 1-hour NO2standard; therefore, a trends chart for the 1-hour NO2standard is not available at this time.
www.gpo.gov

### §414. Right to copies of collective bargaining agreements

It shall be the duty of the secretary or corresponding principal officer of each labor organization, in the case of a local labor organization, to forward a copy of each collective bargaining agreement made by such labor organization with any employer to any employee who requests such a copy and whose rights as such employee are directly affected by such agreement, and in the case of a labor organization other than a local labor organization, to forward a copy of any such agreement to each constituent unit which has members directly affected by such agreement; and such officer shall maintain at the principal office of the labor organization of which he is an officer copies of any such agreement made or received by such labor organization, which copies shall be available for inspection by any member or by any employee whose rights are affected by such agreement. The provisions of section 440 of this title shall be applicable in the enforcement of this section.

(Pub. L. 86–257, title I, §104, Sept. 14, 1959, 73 Stat. 523.)
#### § 25.2704-3 Effective date.

Section 25.2704-1 applies to lapses occurring after January 28, 1992, of rights created after October 8, 1990. Section 25.2704-2 applies to transfers occurring after January 28, 1992, of property subject to applicable restrictions created after October 8, 1990. In determining whether a voting right or a liquidation right has lapsed prior to that date, and for purposes of determining whether the lapse is subject to section 2704(a), taxpayers may rely on any reasonable interpretation of the statutory provisions. For transfers of interests occurring before January 28, 1992, taxpayers may rely on any reasonable interpretation of the statutory provisions in detemining whether a restriction is an applicable restriction that must be disregarded in determining the value of the transferred interest. For these purposes, the provisions of the proposed regulations and the final regulations are considered a reasonable interpretation of the statutory provisions.

[T.D. 8395, 57 FR 4277, Feb. 4, 1992; T.D. 8395, 57 FR 11265, Apr. 2, 1992]
40029.

#### BENNETT v. OVERBY.

Bell, Judge.

The bill of exceptions states that the trial judge “passed an order sustaining said motion for new trial on general grounds.” The order of the trial judge granting the new trial showed conclusively that the grant was “based on the general grounds.” *478“The first grant of a new trial shall not be disturbed by the appellate court if said new trial is granted in the discretion of the judge on general grounds, unless the plaintiff in error shall show that the judge abused his discretion in granting it and that the law and facts require the verdict notwithstanding the judgment of the trial court.” *Code Ann.*§ 6-1608 (Ga. L. 1950, pp. 353, 354); *Cox v. Independent Life &c. Ins. Co.,*101 Ga. App. 211, 216 (113 SE2d 228).

Decided March 12, 1963.

*Bose ■& Lappas, Frank P. Lappas,*for plaintiff in error.

*E. B. Judge,*contra.

The trial judge did not abuse his discretion in granting the new trial. A verdict is not demanded as a matter of law for either party. Judgment of the trial court granting the motion for new trial on the general grounds is

*Affirmed.*

*Carlisle, P. J., and Hall, J., concur.*
p. 1 of 1 

From: Ruhl, Karen I. [mailto:Karen.Ruhl@alcoa.com] 

Sent: Friday, January 03, 2014 2:35 PM 

To: Putney, David 

Subject: RE: Draft emissions file for the Alcoa primary aluminum facilities 

Hi David, 

Attached are the updates you requested. I would like to 

note that we only have a total POM. For the Bake Furnace 

and the pitch tanks, this number is very close to the sum 

of the speciated POM in the spreadsheet; however, for the 

paste plant there is a drastic difference. The total POM 

we have for the paste plant is 10.96 typ. The sum of the 

speciated POM is .29 

tpy. 

 

Also in the noncategory tab, the Calciner and Cooler is not 

a MACT regulated source and should be deleted. It is noted 

on the spreadsheet. 

If you have any additional questions, please let me know. 

Thanks, 

Karen 

Karen Ruhl 

EHS Manager 

Alcoa Primary Metals - Carbon Products 

3943 Granger Road, Lake Charles 70605 

Office 337-480-7656 

Cell 337-263-0452
#### § 29.406 Judicial review.

An individual whose claim for a Federal Benefit Payment has been denied (in whole or part) in a final decision by the Department under § 29.405 may, within 180 days of the date of the final decision, file a civil action in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Any such civil action must be filed in accordance with the rules of that court.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 205.15 When does State interest liability accrue? ( a ) *General rule.* State interest liability may accrue if Federal funds are received by a State prior to the day the State pays out the funds for Federal assistance program purposes. State interest liability accrues from the day Federal funds are credited to a State account to the day the State pays out the Federal funds for Federal assistance program purposes.
( b ) *Refunds.* ( 1 ) A State incurs interest liability on refunds of Federal funds from the day the refund is credited to a State account to the day the refund is either paid out for Federal assistance program purposes or credited to the Federal government.
( 2 ) We and a State may agree, in a Treasury-State agreement, that a State does not incur an interest liability on refunds in refund transactions under $50,000.
( c ) *Exception to the general rule.* A State does not incur an interest liability to the Federal government if a Federal statute requires the State to retain or use for Federal assistance program purposes the interest earned on Federal funds, notwithstanding any other provision in this section.
( d ) *Mandatory matching of Federal funds.* In programs utilizing mandatory matching of Federal funds with State funds, a State must not arbitrarily assign its earliest costs to the Federal government. A State incurs interest liabilities if it draws Federal funds in advance and/or in excess of the required proportion of agreed upon levels of State contributions in programs utilizing mandatory matching of Federal funds with State funds.
#### § 34.502 Allocation of funds—Spill Impact Component.

The Council will allocate amounts to the Gulf Coast States based on the Act and regulations promulgated by the Council. The Council will make allocated funds available through grants for activities described in a State Expenditure Plan approved by the Council.
#### § 34.801 Grant agreements.

The grant agreements used must conform to the Act and Federal laws and policies on grants, including audit requirements.
#### § 1021.600 General.

Casinos and card clubs are subject to the special standards of diligence; prohibitions; and special measures requirements set forth and cross referenced in this subpart. Casinos and card clubs should also refer to subpart F of part 1010 of this chapter for special standards of diligence; prohibitions; and special measures contained in that subpart which apply to casinos and card clubs.
#### In the Matter of All County Ready Mix Corp., Petitioner, v Raymond P. Martinez, Respondent.

[804 NYS2d 409]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the State of New York Department of Motor Vehicles Appeals Board, dated October 30, 2003, which confirmed the determination of an Administrative Law Judge, dated January 16, 2003, made after a hearing, finding that the petitioner violated New York City Traffic Rules and Regulations (34 RCNY) § 4-15 (b) (9), and imposed a penalty.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The petitioner, which owned a truck that was stopped by Officer Brice of the New York City Police Department, Truck Enforcement Unit, at a weigh station, contends that while Officer Brice and other officers at the weigh station might have been stopping trucks pursuant to a nondiscriminatory pattern of selection *(see People v Scott,*63 NY2d 518, 524-525 [1984]), the petitioner’s truck, which was found to have exceeded certain weight limitations, was not stopped in accordance with that plan. However, this specific contention, which is raised for the first time in this proceeding, is not properly before the Court *(see Matter of Willets Point Contr. Corp. v Department of Motor*
      *555
      *Vehs. of State of N.Y.,*227 AD2d 411 [1996]). In any event, the contention is without merit, as the determination of the Administrative Law Judge that the petitioner’s truck was stopped in accordance with the plan was supported by substantial evidence *(see Matter of Metro Demolition Contr. Corp. v Martinez,*12 AD3d 513, 513-514 [2004]; *Matter of Masons v Martinez,*8 AD3d 671, 672 [2004]; *Matter of City Hawk Indus, v Martinez,*2 AD3d 635, 635-636 [2003]). Florio, J.P., Krausman, Skelos and Covello, JJ., concur.
§ 23.32 Notice to subrecipients and beneficiaries. ( a ) Where a recipient passes on Federal financial assistance from Treasury to subrecipients, the recipient shall provide the subrecipients written notice of their obligations under the Act and these regulations.
( b ) Each recipient shall make necessary information about the Act and these regulations available to its program beneficiaries to inform them about the protections against discrimination provided by the Act and these regulations.
# CI2020298EN.01000101.xml

| 8.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 298/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 298/1

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 4 September 2020

adopting the Council’s position on draft amending budget No 7 of the European Union for the financial year 2020

(2020/C 298 I/01)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 314 thereof, in conjunction with the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,

Having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union, amending Regulations (EU) No 1296/2013, (EU) No 1301/2013, (EU) No 1303/2013, (EU) No 1304/2013, (EU) No 1309/2013, (EU) No 1316/2013, (EU) No 223/2014, (EU) No 283/2014, and Decision No 541/2014/EU and repealing Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 (1), and in particular Article 44 thereof,

Whereas:

| — | the Union’s budget for the financial year 2020 was definitively adopted on 27 November 2019 (2), |
| --- | --- |

—

the Union’s budget for the financial year 2020 was definitively adopted on 27 November 2019 (2),

| — | on 6 July 2020, the Commission submitted a proposal containing draft amending budget No 7 to the general budget for the financial year 2020, |
| --- | --- |

—

on 6 July 2020, the Commission submitted a proposal containing draft amending budget No 7 to the general budget for the financial year 2020,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The Council's position on draft amending budget No 7 of the European Union for the financial year 2020 was adopted on 4 September 2020.

The full text can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the Council's website: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/

Done at Brussels, 4 September 2020.

For the Council

The President

M. ROTH

---

(1)  OJ L 193, 30.7.2018, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 57, 27.2.2020, p. 1.

2

---