alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered April 22, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-01439-CR

GUILLERMO DE JES BERRIOS-HERNANDEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F14-76828-Y

ORDER

The reporter’s record is overdue in this appeal. Additionally, the clerk’s record does not 

contain the trial court’s certification of appellant’s right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a), 

(d); Cortez v. State, 420 S.W.3d 803 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013).

Accordingly, we ORDER the trial court to prepare a certification of appellant’s right to 

appeal that accurately reflects the trial court proceedings.

We further ORDER the trial court to make findings of fact regarding whether appellant 

has been deprived of the reporter’s record because of ineffective counsel, indigence, or for any 

other reason.

 The trial court shall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal. If 

the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute the appeal, it shall 

make a finding to that effect.
 If the trial court determines that appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, it shall next 

determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs 

for the reporter’s record. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, the 

trial court shall make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial 

court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective 

representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds 

appellant is not indigent, it shall determine whether retained counsel has abandoned the 

appeal.

 The trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who 

recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) the court reporter’s explanation for the delay 

in filing the reporter’s record; and (3) the earliest date by which the reporter’s record can 

be filed. 

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record, containing the written findings of fact, 

any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date 

of this order. The supplemental record shall also contain the trial court’s certification of 

appellant’s right to appeal.

The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal 

shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, 

whichever is earlier.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
Docket Number FAA-2014-0229
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

RONALD PERREAULT,

Appellant,

v.

CRYSTAL COURT NO. 4 CONDOMINIUM INC.,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-3410

[August 10, 2023]

Appeal of a nonfinal order from the County Court for the Seventeenth 

Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Ellen Feld, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

COWE20002412.

Ronald Perreault, Plantation, pro se. 

Kevin M. Kennedy and Cory B. Kravit of Kravit Law, P.A., Boca Raton, 

for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
H. J. Res. 175

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

Joint Resolution

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1996, and for other

purposes.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law

104–99 is further amended by striking out ‘‘April 24, 1996’’ in

sections 106(c), 112, 126(c), 202(c), and 214 and inserting in lieu

thereof ‘‘April 25, 1996’’; and that Public Law 104–92 is further

amended by striking out ‘‘April 24, 1996’’ in section 106(c) and

inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘April 25, 1996’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
NO. 07-01-0243-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL A

	JUNE 27, 2001

	______________________________

	JOEL TORRES SILVA, APPELLANT

	V.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 110TH DISTRICT COURT OF FLOYD COUNTY;

	NO. 3883; HONORABLE JOHN R. HOLLUMS, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.

	After a plea of not guilty, appellant Joel Torres Silva was found guilty of the offense of possession of a controlled substance and was sentenced to 20 years confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.  The judgment was rendered and the sentence imposed on October 9, 2000.  No motion for new trial was filed.  Appellant filed his notice of appeal on June 5, 2001.

	A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court.  Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1).  If a motion for new trial is filed, the notice of appeal is due 90 days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court.  Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(2).  The record reveals that appellant was brought into open court and the sentence was pronounced on October 9, 2000.  Therefore, the notice of appeal filed over seven months later is untimely. 

	 A timely notice of appeal is essential to invoke the jurisdiction of a court of appeals.  Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996).  If an appeal is not timely perfected, a court of appeals is not vested with jurisdiction and, consequently, can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal.  Id. at 523.  An appellate court may extend the time to file a notice of appeal if, within 15 days after the deadline for filing the notice, the party files a notice of appeal in the trial court and a motion to extend time in the appellate court.  Tex. R. App. P. 26.3.  However, no motion for extension of time has been filed, and this court therefore lacks jurisdiction to consider the appeal.  See Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522.

	Because the notice of appeal was untimely filed, we are without jurisdiction to consider this appeal.  We note that appellant’s notice of appeal states he “was not allowed an opportunity to file a direct appeal”; however, it contains no explanation of what prevented him from filing a timely notice of appeal and the record does not support that contention.  Even if there was supporting evidence, it would not vest this court with jurisdiction and appellant’s sole remedy would be by post-conviction habeas corpus relief.  See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07, § 2 (Vernon Supp. 1994). 

	Accordingly, we must, and do, dismiss the appeal.  

							John T. Boyd

							 Chief Justice

Do not publish.
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 157 (Monday, August 17, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41397-41398]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19665]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security

Materials Technical Advisory Committee; Notice of Partially 
Closed Meeting

    The Materials Technical Advisory Committee will meet on September 
10, 2009, 10 a.m., Herbert C. Hoover Building, Room 3884, 14th Street 
between Constitution & Pennsylvania Avenues, NW., Washington, DC. The 
Committee advises the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Export 
Administration with respect to technical questions that affect the 
level of export controls applicable to materials and related 
technology.

Agenda

Open Session

1. Opening Remarks and Introduction.
2. Presentation on recently mandated changes to the interagency 
Commodity Jurisdiction review process.
3. Report on recent changes to the Commerce Control List based on 
Australia Group Regime list changes.
4. Report of Composite Working group and ECCN review subgroup.
5. New business.
6. Public comments from teleconference and physical attendees.
7. Closed session to follow.

Closed Session

8. Discussion of matters determined to be exempt from the provisions 
relating to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. app. 2 section 10(a)(1) 
and 10(a)(3).

    The open session will be accessible via teleconference to 20 
participants on a first come, first serve basis. To join the 
conference, submit inquiries to Ms. Yvette Springer at 
[email protected] no later than September 3, 2009.
    A limited number of seats will be available during the public 
session of the meeting. Reservations are not accepted. To the extent 
time permits, members of the public may present oral statements to the 
Committee. Written statements may be submitted at any time before or 
after the meeting. However, to facilitate distribution of public 
presentation materials to Committee members, the materials should be 
forwarded prior to the meeting to Ms. Springer via e-mail.
    The Assistant Secretary for Administration, with the concurrence of 
the delegate of the General Counsel, formally determined on October 1, 
2008, pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 
as amended, that the portion of the meeting dealing with matters the 
premature disclosure of which would likely frustrate the implementation 
of a proposed agency action as described in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B) 
shall be exempt from the provisions relating to public meetings found 
in 5 U.S.C. app. 2 Sec.  Sec.  10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3). The remaining 
portions of the meeting will be open to the public.
    For more information, call Yvette Springer at (202) 482-2813.

[[Page 41398]]

    Dated: August 12, 2009.
Yvette Springer,
Committee Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-19665 Filed 8-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-JT-P
```
Amendment No.1 to the Shared Facilities and Services Agreement



 Exhibit 10.34 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE SHARED FACILITIES AND SERVICES AGREEMENT 
 between 
 TABERNA REALTY FINANCE TRUST 
 and

 COHEN BROTHERS, LLC 
 Dated as of April 28, 2006 
 BACKGROUND 
 WHEREAS Taberna Realty Finance Trust (“Taberna”) and Cohen Brothers, LLC (“Cohen”) are party to that certain Shared Facilities and Services Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of
April 28, 2005; and 
 WHEREAS the Agreement’s term expires on April 28, 2006; and 
 WHEREAS, Taberna and Cohen desire to extend the term of the Agreement for one year pursuant to the terms hereof. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement, the parties hereto agree as follows: 

DEFINITIONS 
 Terms used herein but not defined
shall have the meaning assigned such terms in the Agreement. 
 AGREEMENT 
 A. The terms of the Agreement are incorporated herein by reference and shall control unless modified hereby. 
 B. The Agreement as amended and renewed will hereinafter be referred to as the Shared Services Agreement. 
 C. All references and provisions pertaining to Facilities in the Agreement are deleted. 
 D. The Term is hereby extended to July 1, 2008. 
 E. Schedule A of the Agreement is hereby replaced in its entirety with Schedule A to this Amendment No. 1. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment No.1 to the Shared Facilities and Services
Agreement to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written. 
  

			
	COHEN BROTHERS, LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Michael Shenkman

	Name:	 	Michael Shenkman
	Title:	 	Chief Financial Officer
	
	TABERNA REALTY FINANCE TRUST
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Raphael Licht

	Name:	 	Raphael Licht
	Title:	 	 Chief Administrative Officer and
 Chief Legal
Officer



  

 2 








 SCHEDULE A 
 Summary Description of Services 
 RMBS/CMBS/Residential Whole Loan Services 
  

	•	 	 Structuring and managing investments in RMBS, CMBS and residential whole loans 


 Other Services 
  

	•	 	 - Software licensing; 


  

	•	 	 Human resources and other administrative services; and 


  

	•	 	 Other services as is necessary. 


 Service Fee

 Amount: 
 The annual fee for RMBS, CMBS and
residential whole loan Services will be as follows: 
  

	 	•	 	 20 basis points on the amount of the investments in BBB-rated, CMBS and RMBS; 


  

	 	•	 	 10 basis points on the amount of the investments in A-rated, CMBS and RMBS; 


  

	 	•	 	 2 basis points on the amount of the investments in AA/AAA-rated, CMBS and RMBS; 


  

	 	•	 	 1.5 basis points on the amount of the investments in residential whole loans. 


 Other Services shall be provided on an as needed basis at a price not to exceed Cohen Bros.’ costs plus an amount equal to 10% of such costs. 
 Amendment: The Service Fee set forth above may be amended from time to time upon the deletion of any Services pursuant to Section 3.1 of the Agreement. 
  

 3
Exhibit 10.2










Exhibit 10.2


COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS


 
Director Cash Fees
 
Each Non-Employee Director is paid an annual retainer of $55,000, payable quarterly in advance (February 1st, May 1st, August 1st and November 1st). 


 In addition, each Audit Committee member will receive a yearly retainer of $15,000, and each Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee member will receive a yearly retainer of $10,000. All such retainers are payable quarterly in advance (February 1st, May 1st, August 1st and November 1st).
  
The Chair of the Audit Committee receives an annual fee of $30,000, and the Chairs of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Compensation Committee each receive an annual fee of $20,000.


Grant of Restricted Shares of Common Stock 
 
Each Non-Employee Director receives an annual grant in connection with the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of restricted shares of ANN INC. (the “Company”) Common Stock (“Common Stock”) valued at $115,000 on the “grant date” (determined in accordance with the Policy on Grant of Equity Awards).  The number of shares granted to each such Director is determined by using the “fair market value” of the Common Stock on the grant date.  The “fair market value” is the closing price of the Common Stock on the preceding business day.  The restricted shares of Common Stock vest on the date of the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders. If a Director ceases to be a Director for any reason prior to the date of the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the unvested restricted shares will be forfeited.


Non-Executive Chairman Fees


The Non-Executive Chairman of the Board receives an annual retainer of $125,000, comprised of $60,000 in cash and a grant of restricted shares of Common Stock valued at $65,000 on the “grant date”.  The number of shares granted to the Non-Executive Chairman is determined by the same method as the annual grant to Non-Employee Directors.  The restricted shares of Common Stock vest on the date of the next annual meeting of the Board of Directors.  If the Non-Executive Chairman ceases to be the Non-Executive Chairman for any reason prior to the date of the next annual meeting of the Board of Directors, the unvested restricted shares will be forfeited.


Travel Expense Reimbursements and Other Benefits
 
Directors are entitled to reimbursement of their reasonable travel expenses for attending Board of Directors and Board Committee meetings.  


Non-Employee Directors are also eligible to receive discounts on their purchases of the Company's products under the same terms and conditions available to Company associates.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-22-00439-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2

Denton County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV-2022-03570-JP 

Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

Justice Womack concurs without opinion.

KIMBERLY JOHNSON, Appellant

V. 

ONM LIVING LLC, Appellee
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Kimberly Johnson attempts to appeal the trial court’s order declaring 

that she was able to pay court costs and an appeal bond in her eviction case. See Tex. 

R. Civ. P. 510.9.

“As a general rule, appeals may be taken only from final judgments.” Sabre 

Travel Int’l, Ltd. v. Deutsche Lufthansa AG, 567 S.W.3d 725, 730 (Tex. 2019). “Unless a 

statute authorizes an interlocutory appeal, appellate courts generally only have 

jurisdiction over final judgments.” CMH Homes v. Perez, 340 S.W.3d 444, 447 (Tex. 

2011).

We notified Johnson that we were concerned that we might not have 

jurisdiction over this appeal because the order being appealed was not a final 

judgment or an appealable interlocutory order and because the rules applicable to 

eviction suits do not otherwise provide a mechanism for appeal of such an order to

this court.

1 See Tex. R. Civ. P. 500.3(e), 510.9(c)(3); Ferguson v. Self, No. 02-21-00279-

CV, 2021 WL 4783163, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Oct. 14, 2021, no pet.) 

(per curiam) (mem. op.). We stated that unless Johnson filed a response showing 

1

On November 21, 2022, while this appeal was pending, we received another 

notice of appeal and a copy of a final judgment signed by the trial court in the 

underlying eviction suit. The appeal from that final judgment is a separate appeal from 

the appeal of this order. Because Johnson paid the bond and the county court 

accepted the appeal of the eviction judgment, this bond appeal is also moot. See

Meeker v. Tarrant Cnty. Coll. Dist., 317 S.W.3d 754, 759 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2010, 

pet. denied) (“An issue may become moot when a party seeks a ruling on some matter 

that, when rendered, would not have any practical legal effect on a then-existing 

controversy.”).
3

grounds for continuing the appeal, this appeal could be dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 44.3. We have received no response from 

Johnson.

We therefore dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.3(a), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Delivered: December 22, 2022
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 316.1 Offering of bonds.

The Secretary of the Treasury offered for sale to the people of the United States, United States Savings Bonds of Series E, hereinafter generally referred to as “Series E bonds” or “bonds”.

This offer was terminated as of December 31, 1979, except that, as to bonds purchased under payroll savings plans and employee plans, the offer was terminated as of June 30, 1980.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1236 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1236

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
                 coastwise trade for the vessel DANTE.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 14, 1995

  Mrs. Lowey introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
                 coastwise trade for the vessel DANTE.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the 
Act of June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 12106 of title 
46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may issue a 
certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for 
employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel DANTE (United States 
official number 556188).
                                 <all>
```
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1241

To improve the capability to analyze deoxyribonucleic acid.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 15, 1995

Mr. MCCOLLUM introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To improve the capability to analyze deoxyribonucleic acid.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘DNA Identification

5 Grants Improvement Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. DNA IDENTIFICATION GRANTS.

7 Section 1001(a) of the Omnibus Crime Control and

8 Safe Streets Act is amended by striking paragraph (22)

9 and inserting the following:

10 ‘‘(22) There are authorized to be appropriated

11 to carry out part X—

12 ‘‘(A) $8,000,000 for fiscal year 1996;
2

•HR 1241 IH

1 ‘‘(B) $12,000,000 for fiscal year 1997;

2 ‘‘(C) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 1998;

3 ‘‘(D) $6,000,000 for fiscal year 1999; and

4 ‘‘(E) $4,000,000 for fiscal year 2000.’’.

5 SEC. 3. ADVISORY BOARD AND DNA INDEX.

6 Section 210306 of the Violent Crime Control and

7 Law Enforcement Act of 1994 is amended by striking

8 paragraphs (1) through (5) and inserting the following:

9 ‘‘(1) $4,000,000 for fiscal year 1996;

10 ‘‘(2) $4,500,000 for fiscal year 1997;

11 ‘‘(3) $5,000,000 for fiscal year 1998;

12 ‘‘(4) $5,500,000 for fiscal year 1999; and

13 ‘‘(5) $6,000,000 for fiscal year 2000.’’.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 92 Engrossed in House (EH)]

    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
104th Congress
  1st Session
 H. CON. RES. 92

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCUREENT RESOLUTION
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Friday, August 
4, 1995, pursuant to a motion made by the Majority Leader, or his 
designee, it stand adjourned until noon on Wednesday, September 6, 
1995, or until noon on the second day after Members are notified
to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this resolution, whichever 
occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns on any day 
beginning on Saturday, August 5, 1995, through Saturday, August 19, 
1995, pursuant to a motion made by the Majority Leader, or his 
designee, in accordance with this resolution, it stand recessed or 
adjourned until noon on Tuesday, September 5, 1995, or until such time 
on that day as may be specified by the Majority Leader or his designee 
in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second day 
after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, 
in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives August 4 (legislative 
      day, August 3), 1995.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
104th Congress

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 92

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

            Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.
```