alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #11707 and #11708]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

 Amendment 5.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of North Dakota (FEMA—1829—DR), dated 04/10/2009.

*Incident:*                         Severe storms and flooding.                    

*Incident Period:*                         03/13/2009 and continuing through 08/10/2009.                    

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         08/10/2009.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         08/10/2009.                    

*EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         01/11/2010.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for the State of North Dakota, dated 04/10/2009 is hereby amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning 03/13/2009 and continuing through 08/10/2009.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,

Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-19632 Filed 8-14-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Elizabeth A. Kubiak, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[804 NYS2d 478]

*981Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 27, 2004, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

In October 2003, claimant began experiencing headaches and sensitivity to a coworker’s fragrance. She reported this to her laboratory supervisor, who spoke with the coworker, and the coworker ceased wearing the perfume. Claimant continued to experience problems and, on January 12, 2004, resigned. Claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits on the basis that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. This decision was upheld by the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board initially and again upon reconsideration. Claimant now appeals.

We affirm. Inasmuch as claimant’s resignation was not based upon the advice of a physician *(see Matter of Karastathis [Commissioner of Labor],*298 AD2d 822, 823 [2002]) and was done before affording the employer the opportunity to remedy the situation *(see Matter of Estrada [Commissioner of Labor],*261 AD2d 760 [1999]), the Board could find that she left her employment for personal and noncompelling reasons. Claimant admitted that her doctor did not advise her to quit her job, and there was testimony that the employer suggested other options to address the problem, such as relocating claimant to another work station. Claimant, however, resigned before trying these options; in fact, she prepared her letter of resignation before even returning to work following her medical leave of absence. Under the circumstances presented, substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Carpinello and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
409 3rd Street, SW, Suite 210  Washington, DC 20024  202-205-3850 (p)  202-205-6825 (f)  www.nwbc.gov

Numbers and Characteristics 

 There are 911,728 African American women-owned businesses1

 in the United States. This reflects a 

tremendous 66.7% increase in number since 2002 and a 191.4% increase since 1997. In comparison, African 

American men-owned businesses grew 93.1% from 1997 to 2007. 

 African American women-owned firms across the country have total receipts of $36.8 billion. The total 

receipts of African American women-owned firms grew 78.1% since 2002. 

 Women-owned firms make up 47.4% of all African American nonfarm businesses across the country.

 A full 96.5% of these firms are non-employer firms, with average receipts of $15,618.

 The remaining 3.5% of the firms have paid employees, employing a total of 245,474 people across the 

country with a payroll of $5.6 billion. These employer firms have average receipts of $718,374. 

Geography 

 Slightly more than one in 10 (11.7%) of all women-owned firms across the country are owned by African 

American women. 

 The South has the highest representation (17.2%) followed by the Midwest and Northeast (both 11.1%), 

and the West (4.4%).

 The states with the largest number of African American women-owned businesses are: New York 

(98,877), Georgia (88,920), and Florida (86,001).

Industry 

 The top industries for African American women include: health care and social assistance (32.3% of all 

African American WOBs are in this sector), other services (23.0%), and administrative and support and 

waste management and remediation services (9.8%).

 Industries least represented by African American WOBs include management of companies and 

enterprises (less than .01%), utilities (.04%), agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting (.08%), and 

manufacturing (.68%). 

The National Women’s Business Council is a non-partisan federal government council created to serve as an independent source of advice and 

counsel to the President, Congress, and the U.S. Small Business Administration on economic issues of importance to women business owners. 

Members of the Council are prominent women business owners and leaders of women’s business organizations. 

SOURCE: All data comes from the US Census’ 2007 Survey of Business Owners. 

1

 Nonfarm businesses only. Women-owned defined as a woman or women owning 51% or more of the company. 

African American Women-Owned Businesses 

2012
§ 27.1 Purpose. ( a ) The regulations in this part implement the provisions of 31 U.S.C. 333(c), which authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to assess a civil penalty against any person who has misused the words, titles, abbreviations, initials, symbols, emblems, seals, or badges of the Department of the Treasury or any subdivision thereof in violation of 31 U.S.C. 333(a), in accordance with that section and this part.
( b ) The regulations in this part do not apply to the extent that the Secretary or his/her designee has specifically authorized the person to manufacture, produce, sell, possess, or use the words, titles, abbreviations, initials, symbols, emblems, seals, or badges by written contract, agreement, or letter.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

David Eugene Rivard, Appellant

No. 06

- 15

- 00011

- CV v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the County Court at Law of Fannin County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No s . 47,493; 47,676 ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed

for want of jurisdiction . Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the appellant, David Eugene Rivard, has adequately indicated his inability to

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED APRIL 24, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
#### § 55.4981-2 Imposition of excise tax with respect to certain undistributed income of real estate investment trusts; calendar years beginning after December 31, 1986.

Section 4981, as amended by the Tax Reform Act of 1986, imposes an excise tax on a real estate investment trust in the amount of four percent of the excess, if any, of the required distribution for a calendar year over the distributed amount for such calendar year. Section 4981, as so amended, applies only to calendar years that begin after December 31, 1986.

[T.D. 8180, 53 FR 6148, Mar. 1, 1988, as amended by T.D. 9849, 84 FR 9239, Mar. 14, 2019]
39472.

#### FULLER, Administrator v. WEEKES, Guardian.

Decided January 8, 1963.

*Ben F. Sweet,*for plaintiff in error.

*Weekes*cfc *Candler, John Wesley Weekes,*contra.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

The judgment of this court *(Fuller v. Weekes,*105 Ga. App. 790, 125 SE2d 662), reversing the judgment of the trial court, having been reversed by the Supreme Court of Georgia on certiorari *(Weekes v. Fuller,*218 Ga. 515, 128 SE2d 715), the said judgment of this court is vacated and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with the judgment of the Supreme Court.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Frankum and Jordan, JJ., concur.*
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 19 - 0157

_________________ ST ATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JACQUELINE BLACK,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of r ecord and to the Honorable Ray Dayton , District Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 3 2021

03/03/2021
Case Number: DA 19-0157
[Cite as State ex rel. Epps v. Saffold, 2012-Ohio-4612.]

Court of Appeals of Ohio 

EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT 

COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA 

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION 

No. 98684 

STATE EX REL. CARLTON EPPS 

RELATOR 

vs. 

JUDGE SHIRLEY STRICKLAND SAFFOLD 

RESPONDENT 

JUDGMENT: 

WRIT DENIED 

Writ of Procedendo 

Motion No. 457344 

Order No. 458923 

RELEASE DATE: October 3, 2012 
FOR RELATOR 

Carlton Epps 

2000 South Avon Belden Road 

Grafton, Ohio 44044 

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT 

Timothy J. McGinty 

Cuyahoga County Prosecutor 

By: James E. Moss 

Assistant Prosecuting Attorney 

The Justice Center 

1200 Ontario Street, 8th Floor 

Cleveland, Ohio 44113 
JAMES J. SWEENEY, P.J.: 

{¶1} On July 17, 2012, the relator, Carlton Epps, commenced this procedendo 

action against the respondent, Judge Shirley Strickland Saffold, to compel the judge to 

state the number of days he spent in jail in the underlying case, State v. Epps, Cuyahoga 

C. P. No. CR-546428. On February 14, 2012, and June 20, 2012, he filed motions for 

jail-time credit with the respondent. On August 1, 2012, the respondent moved for 

summary judgment on the grounds of mootness. Attached to the dispositive motion 

was a copy of certified journal entry, file-stamped July 24, 2012, in the underlying case, 

granting Epps 66 days of credit. This journal entry establishes that Epps has received 

his requested relief and that the action is, therefore, moot. State ex rel. Corder v. 

Wilson, 68 Ohio App.3d 567, 589 N.E.2d 113 (10th Dist. 1991). Epps never filed a 

response to the motion for summary judgment. 

{¶2} Accordingly, the court grants the respondent’s motion for summary 

judgment and denies the application for a writ of procedendo. Each side to bear their 

own costs. This court directs the clerk of court to serve all parties notice of this 

judgment and its date of entry upon the journal as required by Civ.R. 58(B). 

{¶3} Writ denied. 

 

 

JAMES J. SWEENEY, PRESIDING JUDGE 

COLLEEN CONWAY COONEY, J., and 

SEAN C. GALLAGHER, J., CONCUR
| (logo)  WELLS FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

ReferenceisherebymadetothatcertainPooling and Servicing Agreement dated asofOctober1,2016,byandamongWELLSFARGOCOMMERCIALMORTGAGESECURITIES,INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, CWCAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, asSpecial Servicer, WELLS FARGOBANK,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Trustee and TRIMONT REAL ESTATE ADVISORS, LLC, as OperatingAdvisor and as Asset Representations Reviewer with respect to CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2016-NXS6 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuantto Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice Presidentof Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period fromJanuary 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision,and

 

2.To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the ReportingPeriod.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasexecuted this Certificate as of the 28th day of February2018.

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells  Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|------------------------------------|
# CI2020270EN.01000101.xml

| 17.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 270/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 270/1

---

Commission statement regarding Directive (EU) 2019/1937 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law

(2020/C 270 I/01)

At the time of the review to be conducted in accordance with Article 27 of Directive (EU) 2019/1937 of the European Parliament and the of the Council of 23 October 2019 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law (1), the Commission will consider the possibility of proposing to extend its scope of application to certain acts based on Articles 153 TFEU and 157 TFEU, after consulting the social partners, where appropriate, in accordance with Article 154 TFEU.

---

(1)  OJ L 305, 26.11.2019, p. 17.

---
# CI2020444EN.01000201.xml

| 22.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 444/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 444/2

---

Joint declaration by the European Parliament, Council and Commission on the use of reflows from the ACP Investment Facility to the benefit of the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument

(2020/C 444 I/02)

The Council agrees that an amount of up to EUR 1 billion (in 2018 prices) stemming from the reflows under the ACP Investment Facility for operations under the 9th, 10th, and 11th European Development Funds will be used for the benefit of the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument in the period of 2021-2027. The three Institutions agree that the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument should allow for the reception of those funds.

---
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1225

AN ACT

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938

and for other purposes.quirements applicable to certain public agencies,reporting duties from the compensatory time reto exempt employees who perform certain court
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1225

AN ACT

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to exempt

employees who perform certain court reporting duties

from the compensatory time requirements applicable to

certain public agencies, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1225 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Court Reporter Fair

3 Labor Amendments of 1995’’.

4 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON OVERTIME COMPENSATION FOR

5 COURT REPORTERS.

6 Section 7(o) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938

7 (29 U.S.C. 207(o)) is amended—

8 (1) by redesignating paragraph (6) as para9 graph (7); and

10 (2) by inserting after paragraph (5) the follow11 ing new paragraph:

12 ‘‘(6) The hours an employee of a public agency per13 forms court reporting transcript preparation duties shall

14 not be considered as hours worked for the purposes of sub15 section (a) if—

16 ‘‘(A) such employee is paid at a per-page rate

17 which is not less than—

18 ‘‘(i) the maximum rate established by

19 State law or local ordinance for the jurisdiction

20 of such public agency,

21 ‘‘(ii) the maximum rate otherwise estab22 lished by a judicial or administrative officer and

23 in effect on July 1, 1995, or

24 ‘‘(iii) the rate freely negotiated between the

25 employee and the party requesting the tran-
3

•HR 1225 EH

1 script, other than the judge who presided over

2 the proceedings being transcribed, and

3 ‘‘(B) the hours spent performing such duties

4 are outside of the hours such employee performs

5 other work (including hours for which the agency re6 quires the employee’s attendance) pursuant to the

7 employment relationship with such public agency.

8 For purposes of this section, the amount paid such em9 ployee in accordance with subparagraph (A) for the per10 formance of court reporting transcript preparation duties,

11 shall not be considered in the calculation of the regular

12 rate at which such employee is employed.’’.

13 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

14 The amendments made by section 2 shall apply after

15 the date of the enactment of this Act and with respect

16 to actions brought in a court after the date of the enact17 ment of this Act.

Passed the House of Representatives August 1,

1995.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### In the Matter of Philip Bustos, Petitioner, v City of Rochester et al., Respondents.

[804 NYS2d 227]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County [Thomas A. Stander, J], entered April 11, 2005) to annul the determination of respondents. Respondents terminated petitioner’s employment with the Rochester Police Department.

It is hereby ordered that the determination be and the same hereby is unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed.

Memorandum: Petitioner, a former police officer with respon*1049dent Rochester Police Department, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul the determination terminating his employment after he was found guilty of misconduct. According to petitioner, the penalty of termination is shocking to one’s sense of fairness, particularly in view of the fact that the Hearing Officer recommended only a 60-day suspension. We reject that contention. Following the hearing on the charges, the Hearing Officer found, inter alia, that petitioner documented false information on a police report regarding cash seized from a suspect’s vehicle incident to an arrest. In addition, the Hearing Officer found that, during a locker search, five dime bags of cocaine were discovered in the pocket of petitioner’s winter service coat located in petitioner’s locker. Moreover, when the charges at issue herein arose, petitioner and his partner were the subject of an undercover integrity operation run by the New York State Police. In light of the severity of the charges sustained herein and in view of the fact that petitioner previously pleaded guilty to making a false report, we conclude that the penalty imposed is not shocking to one’s sense of fairness *(see Matter ofAlfieri v Murphy,*38 NY2d 976 [1976]; *see generally Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County,*34 NY2d 222, 234-235 [1974]; *Matter of Jordan v Daly,*302 AD2d 862, 863 [2003]). Finally, to the extent that petitioner contends that the charges sustained are not supported by substantial evidence, we conclude that his contention is lacking in merit *(see generally 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights,*45 NY2d 176, 181-182 [1978]). Present—Green, J.P., Gorski, Smith, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 256.33 For what period of time is interest computed under 31 U.S.C. 1304(b)?

Interest is computed from the date that Fiscal Service receives the copy of the judgment until the date preceding the appellate court's affirmative ruling. If the United States files a Notice of Appeal which it later withdraws, interest is paid on the award through the date before the withdrawal of the Notice of Appeal.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Roberta Shifreen, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[803 NYS2d 328]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 31, 2005, as resettled by a decision filed February 7, 2005, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant resigned from her part-time employment as a library clerk at a correctional facility after her repeated requests for an increase in hours were denied by the employer due to budget constraints. Notwithstanding other complaints about her employment, claimant testified that she would have continued working had her hours been increased. Inasmuch as dissatisfaction with one’s work schedule does not constitute good cause for *824leaving employment (see *Matter of La Clair [Research Found. of State Univ. of N.Y.—Commissioner of Labor],*281 AD2d 677 [2001]; *Matter of Cudnik [Sweeney],*235 AD2d 888 [1997]), we find no reason to disturb the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Spain, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.