alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
40109.

#### BROWN et al. v. SEABOARD SURETY COMPANY.

Hall, Judge.

Error is assigned on a judgment sustaining the general demurrer to an action against the surety on a highway contractor’s bonds. *Held:*

*Code Ann.*§ 23-1705 requires a highway contractor to furnish a surety bond for the protection of “all subcontractors and all persons supplying labor, materials, machinery, and equipment in the prosecution of the work provided for in said contract.” *Code Ann.*§ 23-1708 (2) gives persons protected by the bond, but having no contractual relationship with the prime contractor, the right to sue on the payment bond after giving notice to the prime contractor “stating with substantial accuracy the amount claimed and the name of the party to whom the material was furnished or supplied or for whom the labor was performed or done . . .” The bonds sued on themselves state that they are to be construed as being “in compliance with and subject to the provisions of subparagraphs (1) and (2) of Section 1 of the Act of the General Assembly of Georgia, approved February 27, 1956, amending Section 23-1705 of the Code of Georgia of 1933, as amended (Georgia Laws 1956, pages 340 et seq), as well as the other applicable provisions of the aforesaid 1956 act . . .”, which provisions include *Code Ann.*§ 23-1708, supra.

The petition alleges that a subcontractor on the highway con*821struction projects covered by the bonds engaged the plaintiffs to do maintenance and repair work on the subcontractor’s equipment being used in the two highway construction projects covered by the bonds; that the plaintiffs gave written notices to the prime contractor of their claims for this maintenance and repair work, for which the subcontractor had not paid; and that the notices were acknowledged by the prime contractor. The alleged notices attached to the petition as exhibits refer to project numbers different from or in addition to those covered by the bonds sued on, and show different amounts claimed from the amounts alleged in the petition as sued for under the respective bonds. Neither the alleged notices nor the alleged acknowledgments can be sufficiently identified with the claims alleged as recoverable under the bonds to comply with the statutory requirement of “stating with substantial accuracy the amount claimed.”

Decided May 23, 1963.

*Parker, Howard & Parker, Richard L. Parker, R. E. Fendler, M. E. Thompson, Jr.,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Wiggins & Smith, M. T. Simmons, Jr.,*contra.

While the contractor’s bond statute should be liberally construed for the protection of those who do work or furnish materials for public works, *Ingalls Iron Works v. Standard Ins. Co.,*107 Ga. App. 454, 458, 461 (130 SE2d 606), even giving the statute the most liberal construction possible, this petition fails to show that the condition precedent of notice before suit on the bonds has been substantiálly complied with.

The trial court did not err in sustaining the general demurrer.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Carlisle, P. J.y and Bell, J., concur.*
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1097

To terminate the Office of the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 1, 1995

Mr. GRAHAM (for himself, Mr. TAUZIN, Mr. BALLENGER, Mr. JONES, and Mr.

TAYLOR of North Carolina) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To terminate the Office of the Surgeon General of the Public

Health Service.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That all authorities, funds, and personnel of the Office

4 of the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service are

5 transferred to the Assistant Secretary for Health of the

6 Department of Health and Human Services, and such Of7 fice, and the position of such Surgeon General, are termi8 nated.

Æ
§ 29.322 Disability benefits. If an employee separates for disability retirement after June 30, 1997, and, on the date of separation, the employee— ( a ) Satisfies the age and service requirements for optional retirement, the Federal Benefit Payment commences immediately, that is, the Federal Benefit Payment is calculated as though the employee retired under optional retirement rules using only service through June 30, 1997 (See examples 7A and 7B of appendix A of this subpart); or
( b ) Does not satisfy the age and service requirements for optional retirement, the Federal Benefit Payment begins when the disability retiree reaches deferred retirement age. (See § 29.343.)
All Requirements for Credit Must Be Satisfied by June 30, 1997
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Acting Special Coordinator for the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment Matza’s Travel to Brazil

# 									Acting Special Coordinator for the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment Matza’s Travel to Brazil							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

January 16, 2024

Acting Special Coordinator for the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment (PGI) Helaina Matza will travel to Brasilia and Sao Paulo January 16-18 to advance ongoing PGI-led efforts to facilitate strategic infrastructure investments in critical minerals, clean hydrogen, clean energy infrastructure, and e-mobility.

PGI is working to expand its global economic corridor approach and identify quality, sustainable infrastructure opportunities in the Western Hemisphere. While in Brazil, Acting Special Coordinator Matza will meet with government officials as well as private sector partners to discuss potential infrastructure projects and financing.

Tags

BrazilBureau of Western Hemisphere AffairsOffice of the SpokespersonOffice of the U.S. Special Coordinator for the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and InvestmentOfficial International Travel

Back to Top
§ 29.302 Definitions. In this subpart (including appendix A of this subpart)— *Deferred retirement* means retirement under section 4-623 of the D.C. Code (1997) (under the Police and Firefighters Plan) or section 31-1231(a) of the D.C. Code (1997) (under the Teachers Plan).
*Deferred retirement age* means the age at which a deferred annuity begins to accrue, that is, age 55 under the Police and Firefighters Plan and age 62 under the Teachers Plan.
Department service or departmental service means any period of employment in a position covered by the Police and Firefighters Plan or Teachers Plan. Department service or departmental service may include certain periods of military service that interrupt a period of employment under the Police and Firefighters Plan or the Teachers Plan.
*Disability retirement* means retirement under section 4-615 or section 4-616 of the D.C. Code (1997) (under the Police and Firefighters Plan) or section 31-1225 of the D.C. Code (1997) (under the Teachers Plan), regardless of whether the disability was incurred in the line of duty.
*Enter on duty* means commencement of employment in a position covered by the Police and Firefighters Plan or the Teachers Plan.
Excess leave without pay or excess LWOP means a period of time in a non-pay status that in any year is greater than the amount creditable as service under § 29.105(d).
*Hire date* means the date the employee entered on duty.
*Military service* means- ( 1 ) For the Police and Firefighters Plan, military service as defined in section 4-607 of the D.C. Code (1997) that is creditable as other service under section 4-602 or section 4-610 of the D.C. Code (1997); and
( 2 ) For the Teachers Plan, military service as described in section 31-1230(a)(4) of the D.C. Code (1997).
*Optional retirement* means regular longevity retirement under section 4-618 of the D.C. Code (1997) (under the Police and Firefighters Plan) or section 31-1224(a) of the D.C. Code (1997) (under the Teachers Plan).
*Other service* means any period of creditable service other than departmental service or unused sick leave. Other service includes service that becomes creditable upon payment of a deposit, such as service in another school system (under section 31-1208 of the D.C. Code (1997)) (under the Teachers Plan) or prior governmental service (under the Teachers Plan and the Police and Firefighters Plan); and service that is creditable without payment of a deposit, such as military service occurring prior to employment (under the Teachers Plan and the Police and Firefighters Plan).
*Pre-80 hire* means an individual whose annuity is computed using the formula under the Police and Firefighters Plan applicable to individuals hired before February 15, 1980.
*Pre-96 hire* means an individual whose annuity is computed using the formula under the Teachers Plan applicable to individuals hired before November 1, 1996.
*Sick leave* means unused sick leave, which is creditable in a retirement computation, as calculated under § 29.105(c).
General Principles for Determining Service Credit To Calculate Federal Benefit Payments
39672.

#### ROYAL FINANCE COMPANY v. KNIPHER et al.

Felton, Chief Judge.

The plaintiff in error obtained a money judgment in a trover action against the defendants in error and levy was made on a ñ. fa. which included principal, hire and costs. The property was stolen from the sheriff’s custody *713and the defendants could not be located so, a year later, the clerk of the court issued a fi. fa. against the plaintiff for these same costs plus attorney’s fees for the plaintiff’s attorney. The plaintiff’s affidavit of illegality to the execution, attacking the claim for attorney’s fees, was overruled, to which judgment it excepts.

Decided October 4, 1962.

*E. L. Stephens, Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*Hicks & Hicks, H. T. Hicks, H. Arnold Hicks,*contra.

“Costs” in judicial proceedings includes all charges, fixed by statute, as compensation for services rendered by officers of the court in the progress of the cause, and does not embrace fees, to which counsel prosecuting or defending may be entitled by contract, express or implied, between them and their clients. *Davis v. State of Georgia,*33 Ga. 531, 533; *Markham v. Ross,*73 Ga. 105 (1b). Although a court of equity can in its discretion allow attorney’s fees, this principle does not apply in ordinary adversary proceedings. *Eckford v. Borough of Atlanta,*173 Ga. 650, 652 (160 SE 773). Regardless of whether or not the fi. fa. was properly issued against the plaintiff for the proper costs under *Code*§ 24-3411, which provides for such fi. fa. when the execution is returned “no property to be found,” which question is not here decided, the inclusion of attorney’s fees in the fi. fa. was illegal because the fi. fa. was not issued on any judgment for attorney’s fees in favor of the plaintiff’s attorney against the plaintiff. There is no provision in the Georgia law whereby the clerk of a court can issue a fi. fa. for attorney’s fees against a party in favor of his attorney where there has been no judgment or adjudication in favor of the attorney for such fees upon which to base the execution.

The court erred in its judgment dismissing the affidavit of illegality.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Bell and Hall, JJ., concur.*
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 309.1 Authority for issue and sale.

The Secretary of the Treasury is authorized by the Second Liberty Bond Act, as amended, to issue Treasury bills of the United States on an interest-bearing basis, on a discount basis, or on a combination interest-bearing and discount basis, at such price or prices and with interest computed in such manner and payable at such time or times as he may prescribe; and to fix the form, terms, and conditions thereof, and to offer them for sale on a competitive or other basis, under such regulations and upon such terms and conditions as he may prescribe. Pursuant to said authorization, the Secretary of the Treasury may, from time to time, by public notice, offer Treasury bills for sale, and invite tenders therefor, through the Federal Reserve Banks and branches and through the Department of the Treasury, Bureau of the Fiscal Service. The Treasury bills so offered, and the tenders made, will be subject to the terms and conditions and to the general rules and regulations herein set forth, except as they may be modified in the public notices issued by the Secretary of the Treasury in connection with particular offerings.[1]

###### Footnotes -
  309.1

[1] Accordingly, these regulations do not constitute a specific offering of Treasury bills.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ No. 1D 18

- 4491

_____________________________ D OUGLAS R ATCLIFFE , J R

. , Petitioner ,

v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Certio rari

— Original Jurisdiction

.
December 7, 2018

P ER C URIAM

. D ISMISSED

. M AKAR , O STERHAUS , and W INSOR , JJ., concur
.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331
.

______ _______________________
Douglas Ratcliffe, Jr., pro se , Petitioner

.2 Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent

.
§ 509.120 Double taxation claims. ( a ) *General.* Under Article XVII of the convention, where the taxpayer shows proof that the action of the tax authorities of the United States or Switzerland has resulted, or will result, in double taxation contrary to the provisions of the convention, he is entitled to present the facts to the country of which he is a citizen; or, if he is not a citizen of either country, to the country of which he is a resident; or, if the taxpayer is a corporation or other entity, to the country in which it is created or organized. The article provides that, should the taxpayer's claim be deemed worthy of consideration, the competent authority of the country to which the facts are presented shall undertake to come to an agreement with the competent authority of the other country with a view to equitable avoidance of the double taxation in question.
( b ) *Manner of filing claim.* Such a claim on behalf of a United States citizen, corporation, or other entity, or on behalf of a resident of the United States who is not a Swiss citizen, shall be filed with the Commissioner. The claim shall be set up in the form of a letter addressed to “The Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Washington, D.C.” and shall show fully all facts and laws on the basis of which the claimant alleges that such double taxation has resulted or will result. If the Commissioner determines that there is an appropriate basis for the claim under the convention, he shall take up the matter with the Director of the Federal Tax Administration with a view to arranging an agreement of the character contemplated by Article XVII.
EX-10.44



 





EXHIBIT 10.44




BASE SALARIES FOR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS




     On January 22, 2007, the Compensation and Benefits Committee of the Board of Directors of
American Express Company (the “Company”) approved the annual base salaries (effective as of such
date) of the Company’s executive officers after a review of performance and competitive market
data. The following table sets forth the annual base salary levels of the Company’s Named
Executive Officers (which officers were determined by reference to the Company’s proxy statement,
dated March 17, 2006) for 2007 and 2006:



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Name and Position	 	Year	 	 	Base Salary	 
	Kenneth I. Chenault
	 	 	2007	 	 	$	1,250,000	 
	Chairman and Chief
	 	 	2006	 	 	$	1,100,000	 
	Executive Officer
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Gary L. Crittenden (1)
	 	 	2007	 	 	$	675,000	 
	Former Executive Vice President
	 	 	2006	 	 	$	575,000	 
	and Chief Financial Officer;

Head, Global Network

Services
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Edward P. Gilligan
	 	 	2007	 	 	$	725,000	 
	Group President
	 	 	2006	 	 	$	575,000	 
	American Express International

and Global Corporate Services
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Alfred F. Kelly, Jr.
	 	 	2007	 	 	$	725,000	 
	Group President
	 	 	2006	 	 	$	575,000	 
	Consumer, Small

Business and Merchant Services
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Louise M. Parent
	 	 	2007	 	 	$	525,000	 
	Executive Vice President
	 	 	2006	 	 	$	500,000	 
	and General Counsel
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 









 




			
	(1)	 	Mr. Crittenden resigned from the Company effective February 23, 2007.
#### § 29.525 Ordinary and necessary living expenses.

An individual's ordinary and necessary living expenses include rent, mortgage payments, utilities, maintenance, transportation, food, clothing, insurance (life, health, and accident), taxes, installment payments for which the individual is already liable, medical expenses, support expenses for which the individual is legally responsible, and other miscellaneous expenses that the individual can establish as being ordinary and necessary.
#### § 20.100 What does this part do?

This part carries out the portion of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (41 U.S.C. 701 *et seq.,* as amended) that applies to grants. It also applies the provisions of the Act to cooperative agreements and other financial assistance awards, as a matter of Federal Government policy.
•>'k^SPOR!7\TfO N



### - - "^^sJLa^^w

^ <iJOPFRAlt t '^r¥ ^ I-J: I -H--fr-r- 7 7U~7s " )fU< J£ ^ ^^C<**^-V4!#tt^ur ^-^^tAjC-^^jlZ.ypLC^ 4iJ<€f^^tti>ij2t ^ a^Mui ? £iL^tf^4A£A;ti:^^ ^ ^ c^t ^ ^^-x^S ^ j^„^ ^



# - ..^ ^ yi ^ si^uctc^ ' . -

-ft f ^^l^Ju^tau^^^e ^ ' ^ Ayp ^ .JA< ^. G-TUU ^ /d-o^t ^ ytc^l^^-£ ^ ^M'^^ ^ A- £(Lc^^<^oi^'££y*i

^ T^Ccd f a^-e^^^^^ia-^c^O-K

^ 4Z^<i ^ 'T^^d' O Z?-^^-^:- ^ _ ^^^t.<- ^ <i*< .

### ^ ^ , Leonor e Frie z

Qf \1132 Fairwa

y Dr. Pierre , S D 57501-573 2 £2011 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Managed Pension Assets Partnership 1989-C, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of
operations  contained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended  September 30, 1999
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         73,518
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  47,611
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               121,129
<PP&E>                                         2,320,406
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,123,823)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 317,712
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,220
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     314,492
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   317,712
<SALES>                                        52,922
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               56,089
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  25,872<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,084)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,084)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,084)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>



</TABLE>
#### § 1022.313 Aggregation.

Refer to § 1010.313 of this chapter for reports of transactions in currency aggregation requirements for money services businesses.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 71**  **83**

JERRY ALEXANDER CANZATER , Plaintiff

- Appell ant ,

v.

WARDEN A. J. PADULA, Lee Correctional Institution; MS. BELL, Associate Warden Lee Correctional Institution; MR. OBERMAN, Classification; MS. HILTON, Classification , Defendant s - Appell ees .

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Rock Hill

. Henry M. Herlong, Jr. , Senior District Judge. ( 0:09

- cv - 02197

- HMH )

Subm itted : February 2 8 , 2011 Decided: March 8, 2011

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges

.

Affirm ed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Jerry Alexander Canzater , Appellant Pro Se. Walker Heinitsh Willcox, WILLCOX BUYCK & WIL LIAMS, PA, Florence, South Carolina , for Appellee s .
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jerry Alexander Canzater appeals the district court ’ s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Canzater v. Padula , No. 0:09

- cv - 02197

- HMH (D.S.C. Aug. 9, 2010). We dis pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED