alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order 2013

- 6

- 2

Served: June 5, 2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation

on the 5 th day of June

, 2013

In the matter of the cancelation of the certificate authority issued to

COLGAN AIR , INC.

under 49 U.S.C. § 41102 Docket DOT

- OST

- 20 07

- 28807
Docket DOT

- OST

- 2007

- 28808
Docket DOT

- OST

- 2007

- 0084

ORDER CANCELING CERTIFICATE AUTHORITY

Summary

By this order, we cancel the interstate and foreign sc heduled certificate s issued to Colgan

Air

, Inc. ( “ Colgan ” )

.

Background

By Order 2007

- 11

- 12 , issued November 26, 2007

, Colgan was issued a certificate of public convenience and necessity authorizing it to engage in interstate scheduled air transportation of persons, property, and mail

. B y Order 200 8

- 1

- 17 , the air carrier was issued a companion certificate authorizing it to engage in foreign scheduled air transportation of persons, property, and mail between a point or points in the United States and a poi nt or points in Canada. Subsequent to the air carrier’s initial receipt of foreign certificate authority, by Order 200 8

- 10

- 8, Colgan received additional foreign certificate authority authorizing it to engage in foreign scheduled air transportation between the United States and any foreign country that has entered into an open skies agreement with the United States. The air carrier operated under th e s e certificate s until September 5, 2012 , when it ceased all of its operations.

On February 25, 2013, counse l for Colgan notified the Department that the air carrier had surrendered its Air Carrier Certificate and Operation Specifications to the Federal Aviation

Administration and that Colgan did not oppose cancelation of the air carrier’s economic authority

.

T herefore

, by this order we cancel the interstate and foreign certificate authority held by Colgan

. This action is without prejudice to the company’s filing for new certificate authority in the

future.2

ACCORDINGLY

,

1. We cancel the certificate s of public convenience and necessity issued to Colgan Air

, Inc., by

Order 200 7

- 11

- 12 , Order 2008

- 1

- 17, and Order 2008

- 10

- 8, authorizing it to engage in interstate and foreign scheduled air transportation o f persons, property, and mail.

2

. We will serve a copy of th is order on the persons listed in Attachment A.

By:

SUSAN L. KURLAND Assistant Secretary

for Aviation and International Affairs

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at http://www.regulations.govAttachment A

SERVICE LIST FOR COLGAN AIR , INC.

BRIAN T HUNT

GENERAL COUNSEL

COLGAN AIR INC

1689 NONCONNAH BOULEVARD

SUITE 111

MEMPHIS TN 38132 OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION

DOT/RSPA/B TS E

- 36

1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE

WASHINGTON DC 20590

MARK MAZOR

CERTIFICATION SECTION MANAGER

FAA AFS

- 900 45005 AVIATION DRIVE, SUITE 131

DULLES VA 20166 PETER LYNCH AGC

- 300

ASST CHIEF COUNSEL FOR ENFORCEMENT FEDER

AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

800 INDEPEND ENCE AVE SW

WASHINGTON DC 20591
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1253 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1253

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To rename the San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge as the Don 
          Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1253

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To rename the San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge as the Don 
          Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SAN FRANCISCO BAY NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE RENAMED AS DON 
              EDWARDS SAN FRANCISCO BAY NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE.

    (a) Refuge Renamed.--The San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge 
(established by the Act entitled ``An Act to provide for the 
establishment of the San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge'', 
approved June 30, 1972 (86 Stat. 399 et seq.)), is hereby renamed and 
shall be known as ``the Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife 
Refuge''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in any statute, rule, regulation, 
Executive order, publication, map, or paper or other document of the 
United States to the San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge is 
deemed to refer to the Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife 
Refuge.
    (c) Conforming Amendment.--The Act entitled ``An Act to provide for 
the establishment of the San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge'', 
approved June 30, 1972 (86 Stat. 399 et seq.), is amended by striking 
``San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge'' each place it appears 
and inserting ``Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife 
Refuge''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 12, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2021373EN.01009501.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 21.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 373/95 |

---

Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/2018 of 11 March 2019 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1369 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to energy labelling of refrigerating appliances with a direct sales function

(
[Official Journal of the European Union L 315 of 5 December 2019](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2019_315_R_TOC)
)

On page 174, in Annex IV, in Table 4, Section (a) Supermarket cabinets, is replaced with the following:

| | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | | --- | --- | | ‘(a) | Supermarket cabinets | | | | | | |
| Category | Temperature class | Highest temperature of warmest M-package (°C) | Lowest temperature of coldest M-package (°C) | Highest minimum temperature of all M-package (°C) | Value for C |
| Vertical, combined supermarket refrigerator cabinets | M2 | ≤ +7 | ≥ –1 | n.a. | 1,00 |
| H1 and H2 | ≤ +10 | ≥ –1 | n.a. | 0,82 |
| M1 | ≤ +5 | ≥ –1 | n.a. | 1,15 |
| Horizontal supermarket refrigerator cabinets | M2 | ≤ +7 | ≥ –1 | n.a. | 1,00 |
| H1 and H2 | ≤ +10 | ≥ –1 | n.a. | 0,92 |
| M1 | ≤ +5 | ≥ –1 | n.a. | 1,08 |
| Vertical and combined supermarket freezer cabinets | L1 | ≤ –15 | n.a. | ≤ –18 | 1,00 |
| L2 | ≤ –12 | n.a. | ≤ –18 | 0,90 |
| L3 | ≤ –12 | n.a. | ≤ –15 | 0,90 |
| Horizontal supermarket freezer cabinets | L1 | ≤ –15 | n.a. | ≤ –18 | 1,00 |
| L2 | ≤ –12 | n.a. | ≤ –18 | 0,92 |
| L3 | ≤ –12 | n.a. | ≤ –15 | 0,92 ’ |

---
1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS

No. 123,994

In the Matter of MANDEE ROWAN PINGEL,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DISCHARGE FROM PROBATION

On November 19, 2021, the court ordered Mandee Rowan Pingel suspended from 

the practice of law in the state of Kansas, in accordance with Supreme Court Rule 

225(a)(3) (2021 Kan. S. Ct. R. at 275), for a one-year period. The court then stayed the 

suspension pending Pingel's successful completion of the agreed 12-month probation 

plan. In re Pingel, 314 Kan. 347, 498 P.3d 744 (2021).

On November 22, 2022, Pingel filed a motion to be discharged from probation

along with a supporting affidavit in compliance with Supreme Court Rule 227(g)(1)

(2022 Kan. S. Ct. R. at 284). The Office of the Disciplinary Administrator responded that 

Pingel has fully complied with the conditions of the agreed probation plan, confirmed 

Pingel's eligibility for discharge from probation, and voiced no objection to such 

discharge. 

The court, having reviewed the motion, the supporting affidavit, and the response 

grants Pingel's motion for discharge from probation.

The court orders Pingel fully discharged from probation and closes this 

disciplinary proceeding.
2

The court orders the publication of this order in the Kansas Reports and assesses 

any remaining costs of this proceeding to Pingel.

Dated this 21st day of December 2022.
#### § 26.2641-1 Applicable rate of tax.

The rate of tax applicable to any GST (applicable rate) is determined by multiplying the maximum Federal estate tax rate in effect at the time of the GST by the inclusion ratio (as defined in § 26.2642-1). For this purpose, the maximum Federal estate tax rate is the maximum rate set forth under section 2001(c) (without regard to section 2001(c)(2)).
EXHIBIT 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of JACOBS  FINANCIAL  GROUP,  INC. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  August 31, 2006 (the  "Report")
filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission,  I, John M. Jacobs,  Chief
Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Company's  Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



         October 16, 2006                         /s/ John M. Jacobs
                                                    -------------------------
                                                    John M. Jacobs
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 17

- 00382

- CR

A RCHER B ERNARD J OHNSON

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from

Criminal District Court No. 2

of Tarrant County (1452126D)

September 12, 2019

Opinion by Justice Womack

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judg ment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dana Womack

Justice Dana Womack
#### In the Matter of Mary P. Mitchell, Respondent, v City of New York Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Appellant.

[808 NYS2d 107]

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review certain assessments on the petitioner’s property pursuant to Administrative Code of City of NY § 17-151, the City of New York Department of Health and Mental Hygiene appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jacobson, J.), dated November 24, 2003, which granted the petition and vacated the assessments.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed.

As set forth in the answer to the petition, it is undisputed that the City of New York Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (hereinafter the DOH) sent invoices to the petitioner on or before January 30, 2001, for cleaning and exterminating services it performed on her premises in order to abate a nuisance. The petitioner never denied receipt of these invoices, and her submissions to the court acknowledged that she was aware of these charges. Accordingly, her commencement of this proceeding on or about March 28, 2003, challenging the propriety of those charges was untimely *(see*CPLR 217; *Matter of Cauldwest Realty Corp. v City of New York,*160 AD2d 489*476[1990]; *see generally Matter of Giordano v City of N.Y. Dept. of Fin.,*253 AD2d 432 [1998]; *Matter of 105th St. Dev. Corp. v Commissioner of Dept. of Health of City of N.Y.,*189 Misc 2d 342, 345 [2001]). Moreover, the petitioner’s subsequent correspondence with the DOH and her receipt of additional documents from it regarding the work performed did not serve to toll or revive the limitations period *(see Matter of M & D Contrs. v New York City Dept. of Health,*233 AD2d 230, 231 [1996]; *Matter of Cauldwest Realty Corp. v City of New York, supra*at 491). Therefore, the Supreme Court should have dismissed the proceeding as time-barred. Adams, J.P., Crane, S. Miller and Mastro, JJ, concur.
Exhibit 10.3


AMENDMENT 1


TO


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


 


WHEREAS, Magyar Bancorp,
Inc. (the “Company”) and John S. Fitzgerald (“Executive”) entered into an employment agreement dated November
1, 2007 (the “Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS, the Company and
the Executive wish to amend the Agreement to reflect the Executive’s promotion to President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company.


 


NOW THEREFORE, the Agreement
is hereby amended as follows:


 


	 	1.           Section 1, “Position and Responsibilities” is hereby amended as follows:




 


During the period
of his employment hereunder, Executive agrees to serve as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Bank. The
Executive shall serve under the direction of the Board of Directors, and shall report directly to the Board of Directors. During
said period, Executive also agrees to serve, if elected, as an officer and director of any subsidiary or affiliate of the Company.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
Company and the Executive have adopted this Amendment on the latest date set forth below.


 


 


 


	 	 	 	MAGYAR BANCORP, INC.
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	July 26, 2012	 	By:	/s/ Joseph J. Lukas, Jr.
	 	Date	 	 	Joseph J. Lukas, Jr.
	 	 	 	 	Chairman of the Board
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	EXECUTIVE
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	July 26, 2012	 	By:	/s/ John S. Fitzgerald
	 	Date	 	 	John S. Fitzgerald
- Office Home
- About Us
- Key Topics

HomeScience...About Us

# 									About Us							

Office of Space Affairs

A primary goal of OES is to advance American space leadership by pursing and maintaining a rules-based international framework for the long-term sustainability, commercialization and utilization of space, and by strengthening America’s role in coalitions and bilateral engagements that extend human presence deeper into outer space for long-term exploration and utilization.  The Office of Space Affairs (OES/SA) pursues this goal by:
        - Seeking international support for commercial exploitation of space that ensures responsible behavior while placing minimal burden on the U.S. private sector.
        - Consulting with other nations on the enhanced civil use of space for science, Earth observation, civil positioning, navigation, and timing, and other space-based applications.
        - Pursuing agreement among space-faring nations and commercial interests on an approach to post-International Space Station exploration, to include plans for space-based platforms for further exploration.

OES/SA leads the U.S. delegation to the United Nations Committee on the Peaceful uses of Outer Space; maintains the official U.S. registry of objects launched into outer space; oversees implementation of the 1998 Intergovernmental Agreement on the International Space Station;  and leads U.S Government consultations with other countries and international organizations on space policy and law.  OES/SA also leads interagency coordination on all civil space-related international agreements implementing important NASA, NOAA, and USGS cooperation with other space agency partners, and plays a key role in the implementation of National Space Policy focused on dual-use space applications such as global navigation satellite systems (GNSS), satellite-based earth observation, and the monitoring of physical phenomena in the Sun-Earth system (space weather).

Back to Top
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1235

To terminate the price support program for honey.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 14, 1995

Mr. ZIMMER (for himself, Mr. ARMEY, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. MILLER of Florida,

Mr. UPTON, and Mr. FAWELL) introduced the following bill; which was

referred to the Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To terminate the price support program for honey.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF HONEY PRICE SUPPORT

4 PROGRAM.

5 (a) TERMINATION.—Sections 207 and 405A of the

6 Agricultural Act of 1949 (7 U.S.C. 1446h and 1425a, re7 spectively) are repealed.

8 (b) PAYMENT LIMITATIONS.—Section 1001(2) of

9 the Food Security Act of 1985 (7 U.S.C. 1308(2)) is

10 amended—
2

•HR 1235 IH

1 (1) in subparagraph (B)(iii), by striking ‘‘(other

2 than honey)’’; and

3 (2) by striking subparagraph (C).

4 (c) DESIGNATED NONBASIC AGRICULTURAL COM5 MODITIES.—Section 201(a) of the Agricultural Act of

6 1949 (7 U.S.C. 1446(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘honey,’’.

7 (d) OTHER NONBASIC AGRICULTURAL COMMOD8 ITIES.—Section 301 of the Agricultural Act of 1949 (7

9 U.S.C. 1447) is amended by inserting after ‘‘nonbasic ag10 ricultural commodity’’ the following: ‘‘(other than

11 honey)’’.

12 (e) DEFINITIONS.—Section 408(k) of the Agricul13 tural Act of 1949 (7 U.S.C. 1428(k)) is amended by strik14 ing ‘‘honey,’’ each place it appears.

15 (f) POWERS OF COMMODITY CREDIT CORPORA16 TION.—Section 5(a) of the Commodity Credit Corporation

17 Charter Act (15 U.S.C. 714c(a)) is amended by inserting

18 after ‘‘agricultural commodities’’ the following: ‘‘(other

19 than honey)’’.

20 (g) TRANSITION.—The amendments made by this

21 section shall not affect the liability of any person under

22 any provision of law as in effect before the effective date

23 of this section.

24 (h) PROHIBITION ON SUBSEQUENT PRICE SUP25 PORT.—After the effective date of this section, notwith-
3

•HR 1235 IH

1 standing any other provision of law, the Secretary of Agri2 culture shall not provide price support, loans, or payments

3 for honey by using the funds of the Commodity Credit

4 Corporation or under the authority of any law.

5 (i) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section and the amend6 ments made by this section shall take effect on enactment.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6042

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. RICHARDE DANIEL CARTER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (3:04-cr-00094-RLV-CH-1; 3:07-cv-00292-RLV) Submitted: May 22, 2008 Decided: May 28, 2008 Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richarde Daniel Carter, Appellant Pro Se. Robert John Gleason, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Richarde Daniel Carter seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Carter has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and di smiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Umanzor, Appellant.

[804 NYS2d 264]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated May 10, 2004 *(People v Umanzor,*7 AD3d 646 [2004]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, rendered October 31, 2000.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., Florio, Cozier and Mastro, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, August 20, 2009 at 2 p.m.

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.

Chairman Schapiro, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session.

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, August 20, 2009 will be: 

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions; 

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings; and 

Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: August 13, 2009.

Elizabeth M. Murphy, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-19798 Filed 8-13-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P