**UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION**

**Washington, D.C. 20549**

**FORM 10-K**

(Mark One)

**x****  ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

**For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021or**

**o**** ****TRANSITIONREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

**For the transition period from _____ to _____Commission file number of the issuing entity: 333-190246-18**

**Central Index Key Number of the issuing entity:0001656088**

**JPMBB Commercial MortgageSecurities Trust 2015-C33**

**(exact name of the issuing entity as specified in itscharter)**

** **

**Central Index Key Number of the depositor: 0001013611**

**J.P. Morgan Chase CommercialMortgage Securities Corp.**

**(exact name of the depositor as specified in itscharter)**

** **

**Central Index Key Number of the sponsor: 0000835271**

**JPMorgan Chase Bank, NationalAssociation**

**(exact name of the sponsor as specified in its charter)**

** **

**Central Index Key Number of the sponsor: 0000312070**

**Barclays Bank PLC**

**(exact name of the sponsor as specified in its charter)**

** **

**Central Index Key Number of the sponsor: 0001541468**

**Ladder Capital Finance LLC**

**(exact name of the sponsor as specified in its charter)**

** **

**Central Index Key Number of the sponsor: 0001567746**

**Redwood Commercial MortgageCorporation**

**(exact name of the sponsor as specified in its charter)**

** **

| **New York****(State or other jurisdiction of  incorporation or organization of**

**the issuing entity)** | **38-3984612**

**38-3984613**

**38-7143658**

**(I.R.S. Employer**

**Identification Numbers)** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**c/o Wells Fargo Bank, National Association**

**as Certificate Administrator**

**9062 Old Annapolis Road**

**Columbia, MD**

**(Address of principalexecutive offices of the issuing entity)**

**21045**

**(Zip Code)**

**Registrant’s telephone number,including area code:**

**(212) 834-5467**

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

| Title of each class | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of each  exchange on which registered |
|---------------------|-------------------|--------------------------------------------|
| None                |              |                                       |

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of theAct:  None.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-knownseasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  o Yes ⌧No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required tofile reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  o Yes ⌧No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filedall reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter periodthat the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has beensubject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  ⌧ Yes oNo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submittedelectronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every InteractiveData File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 ofRegulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and postsuch files).

Not applicable.

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filerspursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this chapter) is notcontained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’sknowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated byreference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form10-K.   

Not applicable.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a largeaccelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reportingcompany, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “largeaccelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large acceleratedfiler        o                                                                                                       Acceleratedfiler                                     o

Non-acceleratedfiler          ⌧  (Do not check ifa smaller reporting company)                          Smaller reportingcompany                    o

                                                                                                                                                       Emerging growthcompany                    o

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if theregistrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complyingwith any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant toSection 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed areport on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectivenessof its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of theSarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firmthat prepared or issued its audit report. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shellcompany (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  o Yes ⌧ No

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-votingcommon equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price atwhich the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price ofsuch common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s mostrecently completed second fiscal quarter.

Not applicable.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed alldocuments and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securitiesunder a plan confirmed by a court.  oYes oNo

Not applicable.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of theregistrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Not applicable.

**DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE**

** **

List hereunder the following documents if incorporated byreference and the Part of the Form 10-K (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) intowhich the document is incorporated: (1) Any annual report to security holders;(2) Any proxy or information statement; and (3) Any prospectus filed pursuantto Rule 424(b) or (c) under the Securities Act of 1933. The listed documentsshould be clearly described for identification purposes (e.g., annual report tosecurity holders for fiscal year ended December 24, 1980).

Not applicable.

 

** **

**EXPLANATORY NOTES**

The 32 Avenue of the Americas Mortgage Loanand the DoubleTree Anaheim - Orange County Mortgage Loan, which constitutedapproximately 16.4% and 3.9%, respectively, of the asset pool of the issuingentity as of its cut-off date, are each an asset of the issuing entity and areeach part of a loan combination that includes (a) with respect to the 32 Avenueof the Americas Mortgage Loan, four other *pari passu* loans, which arenot assets of the issuing entity and (b) with respect to the DoubleTree Anaheim- Orange County Mortgage Loan, one other *pari passu* loan, which is notan asset of the issuing entity. These loan combinations, including the 32Avenue of the Americas Mortgage Loan and the DoubleTree Anaheim - Orange CountyMortgage Loan, are being serviced and administered pursuant to the Pooling andServicing Agreement, which is incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.1 to thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K. 

The Exhibit Index describesexhibits provided by certain parties (in their capacities indicated on the ExhibitIndex) with respect to the New Center One Building Mortgage Loan, whichconstituted approximately 2.5% of the asset pool of the issuing entity as ofits cut-off date.  The New Center One Building Mortgage Loan is an assetof the issuing entity and is part of a loan combination that includes the NewCenter One Building Mortgage Loan and one other *pari passu* loan, whichis not an asset of the issuing entity. The other *pari passu* portion ofthe loan combination was securitized in the JPMBB Commercial MortgageSecurities Trust 2015-C32 transaction, Commission File Number 333-190246-17(the “JPMBB 2015-C32 Transaction”). This loan combination, including theNew Center One Building Mortgage Loan, is being serviced and administeredpursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement for the JPMBB 2015-C32Transaction, which is incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.2 to this AnnualReport on Form 10-K.

The master servicer of a poolingand servicing agreement or trust and servicing agreement also functions as theprimary servicer of the related mortgage loans serviced and administeredpursuant to such agreement unless a separate primary servicer is identifiedherein.  If this report does not identify a separate primary servicer, theservicer compliance statement provided by the master servicer under any suchagreement also encompasses its responsibilities as primary servicer of therelated mortgage loan or mortgage loans.

Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation is the master servicer and certificate administrator of themortgage loans serviced under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and theprimary servicer of the New Center One Building Mortgage Loan. As a result,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association is a “servicer” as defined in Item1108(a)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB, in the capacities described above, because itis servicing mortgage loans that constituted 10% or more of the assets of theissuing entity as of its cut-off date. The assessments of compliance withapplicable servicing criteria, accountants’ attestation reports and servicercompliance statements delivered by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association inthe capacities described above are listed in the Exhibit Index.

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association is the custodian ofthe mortgage loans serviced under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and theNew Center One Building Mortgage Loan.  As a result, Wells Fargo Bank,National Association is a servicing function participant in the capacities describedabove, because it is servicing mortgage loans that constituted 5% or more ofthe assets of the issuing entity as of its cut-off date. The assessments ofcompliance with applicable servicing criteria and accountants’ attestationreports delivered by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association in the capacitiesdescribed above are listed in the Exhibit Index.

Pentalpha Surveillance LLC is the senior trust advisor of themortgage loans serviced under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and the NewCenter One Building Mortgage Loan.  As a result, Pentalpha SurveillanceLLC is a servicing function participant in the capacities described above,because it is servicing mortgage loans that constituted 5% or more of theassets of the issuing entity as of its cut-off date. The assessments ofcompliance with applicable servicing criteria and accountants’ attestationreports delivered by Pentalpha Surveillance LLC in the capacities describedabove are listed in the Exhibit Index.

Wilmington Trust, National Associationacts as trustee of  the mortgage loans serviced under the Pooling andServicing Agreement and the New Center One Building Mortgage Loan. Pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and the pooling and servicingagreement for the JPMBB 2015-C32 Transaction, the trustee is required toprovide an assessment of compliance with applicable servicing criteria solelywith respect to Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB (regarding advances offunds or guarantees regarding collections, cash flows or distributions, and anyinterest or other fees charged for such advances, are made, reviewed andapproved as specified in the transaction agreements). However, during thereporting period, the trustee did not perform any servicing function withrespect to the servicing criteria specified in Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) ofRegulation AB.  The master servicer or the special servicer, to the extentrequired, performed the servicing function identified with respect to Item1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB, and each such party included Item1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB in the assessment of compliance withapplicable servicing criteria and accountant’s attestation report for thesubject transaction.  As a result, this Annual Report on Form 10-K doesnot include an assessment of compliance with applicable servicing criteria ofthe trustee. One or more other servicers of  the mortgage loans servicedunder the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and the New Center One BuildingMortgage Loan have delivered one or more assessments of compliance with respectto Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB.

This Annual Report on Form 10-Kincludes assessments of compliance with applicable servicing criteria andaccountants’ attestation reports from CoreLogic Solutions, LLC. This entity wasengaged by the master servicer under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement andthe primary servicer of the New Center One Building Mortgage Loan to remit taxpayments received from the escrow accounts of borrowers to local taxingauthorities, to report tax amounts due, to verify tax parcel information, andto verify non-escrow tax payments. These servicing functions are includedwithin the servicing criteria set forth in Items 1122(d)(4)(xi) and1122(d)(4)(xii) of Regulation AB.  Therefore, under the principles-baseddefinition of “servicer” set forth in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB that looksto the functions that an entity performs, this vendor is a “servicer” for thepurposes of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.  *See* Compliance andDisclosure Interpretations, Section 301.01 (Item 1101(j)).

This Annual Report on Form 10-Kincludes an assessment of compliance with applicable servicing criteria,accountants’ attestation report and servicer compliance statement fromComputershare Trust Company, National Association (“CTCNA”).  CTCNAwas engaged by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo”),in its capacity as certificate administrator and custodian, to perform certainspecified servicing functions identified in the assessment of compliance withapplicable servicing criteria and accountants’ attestation reports.  WellsFargo engaged CTCNA in connection with the sale of Wells Fargo’s corporatetrust services business to CTCNA and its affiliates.  Further, under theprinciples-based definition of “servicer” set forth in Item 1101(j) ofRegulation AB that looks to the functions that an entity performs, this partyis a “servicer” for the purposes of Item 1123 of Regulation AB.  SeeCompliance and Disclosure Interpretations, Section 301.01 (Item 1101(j)).

The assessmentof compliance with applicable servicing criteria, accountants’ attestationreport and servicer compliance statement of the certificate administrator ofthe New Center One Building Mortgage Loan is omitted from this Annual Report onForm 10-K as the certificate administrator pursuant to the related pooling andservicing agreement or trust and servicing agreement does not perform anyactivities that address servicing criteria with respect to the issuing entityand because it is not a “servicer” that meets the criteria in Item1108(a)(2)(i) through (iii) of Regulation AB.

With respect to the *pari passu*loan combination that includes the New Center One Building Mortgage Loan, (i)the report on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria and attestationreport on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria of LNR Partners, LLCas special servicer of the New Center One Building Mortgage Loan, listed on theExhibit Index are omitted from this Annual Report on Form 10-K as they are notrequired to be included on this Annual Report on Form 10-K per Instruction 3 toItem 1122 of Regulation AB because it is a party performing activities thataddress servicing criteria relating to 5% or less of the assets of the issuingentity; and (ii) the servicer compliance statement of LNR Partners, LLC asspecial servicer of the New Center One Building Mortgage Loan, listed on theExhibit Index is omitted from this Annual Report on Form 10-K as it is notrequired by Item 1123 of Regulation AB to be included on this Annual Report onForm 10-K because it is an unaffiliated party that is not a “servicer” thatmeets the criteria in Item 1108(a)(2)(i) through (iii) of Regulation AB.

**PART I**

**Item 1.  Business.**

Omitted.

**Item 1A.  Risk Factors.**

Omitted.

**Item 1B.  Unresolved Staff Comments.**

None.

**Item 2.  Properties.**

Omitted.

**Item 3.  Legal Proceedings.**

Omitted.

**Item 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures.**

Not applicable.

**PART II**

**Item 5.  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity,Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.**

Omitted.

**Item 6.  Selected Financial Data.**

Omitted.

**Item 7.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis ofFinancial Condition and Results of Operations.**

Omitted.

**Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative DisclosuresAbout Market Risk.**

Omitted.

**Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.**

Omitted.

**Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements WithAccountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.**

Omitted.

**Item 9A.  Controls and Procedures.**

Omitted.

**Item 9B.  Other Information.**

None.

**PART III**

**Item 10.  Directors, Executive Officers and CorporateGovernance.**

Omitted.

**Item 11.  Executive Compensation.**

Omitted.

**Item 12.  Security Ownership of Certain BeneficialOwners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.**

Omitted.

**Item 13.  Certain Relationships and RelatedTransactions, and Director Independence.**

Omitted.

**Item 14.  Principal Accounting Fees and Services.**

Omitted.

**ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURE ITEMS FOR REGULATION AB**

**Item 1112(b) of Regulation AB, Significant ObligorFinancial Information.**

The 32 Avenue of the AmericasMortgage Loan (Loan # 1 on Annex A-1 of the prospectus supplement of theregistrant relating to the issuing entity filed on November 30, 2015 pursuantto Rule 424(b)(5)) constitutes a significant obligor within the meaning of Item1101(k)(2) of Regulation AB as disclosed in the prospectus supplement. Inaccordance with Item 1112(b) of Regulation AB, the most recent unaudited netoperating income of the significant obligor was $43,245,785.06 for the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2021.

**Item 1114(b)(2) of Regulation AB, Significant EnhancementProvider Financial Information.**

No entity or group of affiliated entities provides any external creditenhancement or other support for the certificates within this transaction asdescribed under Item 1114(a) of Regulation AB.

**Item 1115(b) of Regulation AB, Certain DerivativesInstruments (Financial Information).**

No entity or group of affiliated entities provides anyderivative instruments or other support for the certificates within thistransaction as described under Item 1115 of Regulation AB.

**Item 1117 of Regulation AB, Legal Proceedings.**

The registrant knows of no material pending legal proceedinginvolving the trust or any party related to the trust, other than routinelitigation incidental to the duties of those respective parties, and thefollowing, with respect to Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCertificate Administrator and Custodian, and CWCapital Asset Management LLC, asSpecial Servicer.

 

In December 2014, Phoenix Light SFLimited and certain related entities and the National Credit UnionAdministration (NCUA) filed complaints in the United States District Court forthe Southern District of New York against Wells Fargo Bank, alleging claimsagainst Wells Fargo Bank in its capacity as trustee for a number of residentialmortgage-backed securities trusts. Complaints raising similar allegations havebeen filed by Commerzbank AG in the Southern District of New York and by IKBInternational and IKB Deutsche Industriebank in New York state court. In eachcase, the plaintiffs allege that Wells Fargo Bank, as trustee, caused losses toinvestors, and plaintiffs assert causes of action based upon, among otherthings, the trustee’s alleged failure to notify and enforce repurchase obligationsof mortgage loan sellers for purported breaches of representations andwarranties, notify investors of alleged events of default, and abide byappropriate standards of care following alleged events of default. Wells FargoBank previously settled two class action lawsuits with similar allegations thatwere filed in November 2014 and December 2016 by institutional investors in theSouthern District of New York and New York state court, respectively. Inaddition, Park Royal I LLC and Park Royal II LLC have filed complaints in NewYork state court alleging Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee, failed to takeappropriate actions upon learning of defective mortgage loan documentation. InMarch 2021, the Company entered into an agreement to resolve the case filed bythe NCUA.

 

In addition to the foregoingcases, in August 2014 and August 2015 Nomura Credit & Capital Inc. (“Nomura”)and Natixis Real Estate Holdings, LLC (“Natixis”) filed a total of seventhird-party complaints against Wells Fargo Bank in New York state court. In theunderlying first-party actions, Nomura and Natixis have been sued for allegedbreaches of representations and warranties made in connection with residentialmortgage-backed securities sponsored by them. In the third-party actions, Nomuraand Natixis allege that Wells Fargo Bank, as master servicer, primary serviceror securities administrator, failed to notify Nomura and Natixis of their ownbreaches, failed to properly oversee the primary servicers, and failed toadhere to accepted servicing practices. Natixis additionally alleges that WellsFargo Bank failed to perform default oversight duties. Wells Fargo Bank hasasserted counterclaims alleging that Nomura and Natixis failed to provide WellsFargo Bank notice of their representation and warranty breaches. 

With respect to each of the foregoing litigations, WellsFargo Bank believes plaintiffs' claims are without merit and intends to contestthe claims vigorously, but there can be no assurances as to the outcome of thelitigations or the possible impact of the litigations on Wells Fargo Bank orthe related RMBS trusts.

From time to time, CWCapital Asset Management LLC, a Delawarelimited liability company (“CWCAM”), is a party to lawsuits and otherlegal proceedings as part of its duties as a special servicer (e.g.,enforcement of loan obligations) and/or arising in the ordinary course ofbusiness.  Other than as set forth in the following paragraphs, there arecurrently no legal proceedings pending, and no legal proceedings known to becontemplated by governmental authorities, against CWCAM or of which any of itsproperty is the subject, that are material to the certificateholders.

On December 17, 2015, U.S. Bank National Association, thetrustee under five pooling and servicing agreements for (i) Wachovia BankCommercial Mortgage Trust 2007-C30, (ii) COBALT CMBS Commercial Trust 2007-C2,(iii) Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-C31, (iv) ML-CFC CommercialMortgage Trust 2007-5 and (v) ML-CFC Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-6 commenceda proceeding with the Second Judicial District Court of Ramsey County,Minnesota (the “State Court”) for a declaratory judgment as to theproper allocation of certain proceeds (“Disputed Proceeds”) received byCWCAM in connection with the sale of the Peter Cooper Village and StuyvesantTown property in New York, New York securing loans held by those trusts. CWCAM was the special servicer of such property.  The petition requeststhe State Court to instruct the trustee, the trust beneficiaries, and any otherinterested parties as to the amount of the Disputed Proceeds, if any, thatconstitute penalty interest and/or the amount of the Disputed Proceeds, if any,that constitute gain-on-sale proceeds, with respect to each trust.  OnFebruary 24, 2016, CWCAM made a limited appearance with the State Court to filea motion to dismiss this proceeding based on lack of jurisdiction, mootness,standing and forum non conveniens.  On July 19, 2016, the State Courtdenied CWCAM’s motion to dismiss.  On July 22, 2016, the action wasremoved to federal court in Minnesota (“Federal Court”).  OnOctober 21, 2016, the Federal Court held a hearing on the motion to transferthe action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of NewYork (“SDNY Court”), a motion to remand to state court and a motion tohear CWCAM’s request for reconsideration of the motion to dismiss.  OnMarch 14, 2017, the Federal Court reserved the determination on the motion tohear CWCAM’s request for reconsideration of the motion to dismiss, denied themotion to remand the matter to state court and granted the motion to transferthe proceeding to the SDNY Court.  Cross motions for judgment on thepleadings were filed but the SDNY Court was unable to decide the case based onthe pleadings and the SDNY Court ordered discovery.  All fact discoverywas completed in December, 2018 and expert discovery was completed on March 15,2019.  The parties submitted cross motions for summary judgment, and onMarch 19, 2020, the SDNY Court entered an opinion andorder in which it granted summary judgment in CWCAM’s favor and held that CWCAMwas entitled to the entire amount of penalty interest and that CWCAM’sdetermination of Yield Maintenance was correct.  In the 127-page opinion,the SDNY Court found for CWCAM on every issue presented by the trustee’spetition, namely, that the funds in dispute constitute penalty interest andyield maintenance, not gain-on-sale proceeds, and that the amount of penaltyinterest and yield maintenance was correctly calculated. An appeal of the SDNYCourt’s decision was taken on April 29, 2020.  Oral argument on the appealoccurred on June 21, 2021. The parties await the decision of the appealscourt.  

On December 1, 2017, a complaint against CWCAM and others wasfiled in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New Yorkstyled as CWCapital Cobalt Vr Ltd. v. CWCapital Investments LLC, et al., No.17-cv-9463 (the “Original Complaint”). The gravamen of theOriginal  Complaint alleged breaches of a contract and fiduciary duties byCWCAM’s affiliate, CWCapital Investments LLC in its capacity as collateralmanager for the collateralized debt obligation transaction involving CWCapitalCobalt Vr, Ltd. In total, there are 14 counts pled in the Original Complaint.Of those 14, 5 claims were asserted against CWCAM for aiding and abettingbreach of fiduciary duty, conversion and unjust enrichment. On May 23, 2018,the Original Complaint was dismissed for lack of subject matterjurisdiction.   On June 28, 2018, CWCapital Cobalt Vr Ltd. filed asubstantially similar complaint in the Supreme Court of the State of New York,County of New York styled as CWCapital Cobalt Vr Ltd. v. CWCapital InvestmentsLLC, et al., Index No. 653277/2018 (the “New Complaint”).  The gravamenof the New Complaint is the same as the previous complaint filed in the UnitedState District Court for the Southern District of New York.  In totalthere are 16 counts pled in the New Complaint. Of those 16 counts, 5 claimswere asserted against CWCAM for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty,conversion and unjust enrichment, 1 count seeks a declaratory judgement thatthe plaintiff has the right to enforce the contracts in question and 1 countseeks an injunction requiring the defendants to recognize the plaintiff as thedirecting holder for the trusts in question. On January 11, 2019, the plaintiffdismissed with prejudice the declaratory judgment and injunction counts. The New Complaint and related summons was not served on the defendants untilJuly 13, 2018 and July 16, 2018.  The plaintiff’s motion for a preliminaryinjunction was denied by the court on July 31, 2018.  On August 3, 2018,the defendants, including CWCAM, filed a motion to dismiss the New Complaint inits entirety. On August 20, 2019, the court entered an order grantingdefendants’ motion almost in its entirety, dismissing 11 of the 16 counts andpartially dismissing 2 additional counts.  Of the remaining counts, 2 areasserted against CWCAM for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty andunjust enrichment.  On September 19, 2019, CWCapital Cobalt Vr Ltd. fileda notice of appeal relating to the August 20, 2019 dismissal order and onSeptember 26, 2019, filed an amended complaint against CWCI and CWCAMattempting to address deficiencies relating to certain of the claims dismissedby the August, 20, 2019 order.  CWCI and CWCAM filed its Motion to Dismissthe amended complaint on October 28, 2019.  The court heard argument onthe Motion to Dismiss the amended complaint on January 22, 2020 and on October23, 2020, the court granted the motion dismissing the amended claims.  OnNovember 30, 2020, CWCapital Cobalt Vr Ltd filed a notice of appeal relating tothe October 23, 2020 dismissal order.  On April 27, 2021, the First Departmentaffirmed the dismissal as to claims against CWCAM that were part of the August20, 2019 dismissal, but reversed the dismissal of two counts for breach of theCollateral Management Agreement against CWCI.  CWCI has sought leave tofile an appeal of the decision.  Both requests for leave were denied bythe First Department.  The plaintiff has also sought leave to appeal thedismissal of the claims against CWCAM.  CWCAM believes that it hasperformed its obligations under the related pooling and servicing agreements ingood faith and the remaining allegations in the New Complaint are withoutmerit.  

On January 24, 2016 PSW NYC LLC commenced a complaint (the“PSW Complaint”) with the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of NewYork (the “PSW Court”) against Bank of America, N.A. as trustee under thepooling and servicing agreements for Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust2007-C30 and COBALT CMBS Commercial Trust 2007-C2, U.S. Bank NationalAssociation as trustee under the pooling and servicing agreements for WachoviaBank Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-C31, ML-CFC Commercial Mortgage Trust2007-5 and ML-CFC Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-6 (collectively, the “PSWTrusts”), PCV-M Holdings LLC and CWCapital Asset Management LLC, individually andas special servicer for the PSW Trusts (collectively, the “Defendants”) seekingeither (a) damages in an amount to be determined by the PSW Court but allegedby the plaintiffs to be approximately $500,000,000 – such amount being theamount PSW NYC LLC alleges would have been recovered on certain mezzanine loans(the “PCVST Mezzanine Loans”) related to the Peter Cooper Village andStuyvesant Town property (the “PCVST Property”) in New York City which PSW NYCLLC sold to an entity related to the Defendants pursuant to a settlementagreement related to certain prior litigation (the “2010 Settlement Agreement”)or (b) the rescission of the 2010 Settlement Agreement which would result in,among other things, the rescission of the sale of the PCVST Mezzanine Loans anda claim for certain proceeds from the sale of the PCVST Property. PSW NYC LLCalleges that the Defendants procured the 2010 Settlement Agreement by fraud andfurther that the terms of the 2010 Settlement Agreement were breached by theDefendants. On February 26, 2016, CWCAM on behalf of itself and the otherDefendants filed a motion to dismiss the PSW Complaint (the “CWCAM Motion toDismiss”). On April 11, 2016, PSW NYC LLC opposed the CWCAM Motion to Dismissand cross-moved for a partial summary judgment on liability regardingallegations of breach of the 2010 Settlement Agreement (the “PSWCross-Motion”). On May 5, 2016, the Defendants subsequently filed its reply andopposition to the PSW Cross-Motion. On August 23, 2016, oral arguments were providedto the PSW Court regarding the PSW Complaint, the CWCAM Motion to Dismiss andthe PSW Cross-Motion and the PSW Court took such arguments under advisement. OnOctober 31, 2016, the PSW Court issued an order granting the CWCAM Motion toDismiss, denying the PSW Cross-Motion and dismissing the PSW Complaint withprejudice. Subsequently, PSW NYC LLC filed a notice of appeal relating to suchorder. On February 21, 2017, PSW NYC LLC filed its appeal and supporting briefarguing that the PSW Court erred by finding no breach of the assignmentagreement and no fraudulent inducement. Oral argument was heard on May 4, 2017at which point the court took the arguments under advisement. On May 25, 2017,the New York 1st Department appellate court affirmed the dismissalof all PSW claims and denied a request for leave to appeal to the New YorkCourt of Appeals on September 12, 2017.  

On March 31, 2016, RAIT Preferred Funding II LTD. (“RAITPreferred Funding”) commenced a complaint (“RAIT Complaint”) withthe Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York (the “RAITCourt”), claiming it owns $18,500,000 of a mortgage loan secured by thedevelopment of the One Congress Street Property in Boston, Massachusetts (the “Loan”)and seeking (a) a declaratory judgment stating that RAIT Preferred Funding isthe directing lender under a co-lender agreement dated March 28, 2007 and apooling and servicing agreement dated March 1, 2007 (collectively, the “OperativeAgreements”) and was the directing lender at the time of the impropermodification of the Loan, (b) a declaratory judgment stating that RAITPreferred Funding has the right to terminate the special servicer, (c) monetarydamages for the value of the bonds and fees paid to CWCAM as the specialservicer of the Loan and (d) other things.  On May 17, 2016, CWCAM filed amotion to dismiss the RAIT Complaint (“Motion to Dismiss”) stating thatthe RAIT Complaint did not state a claim and the essential facts of the RAITComplaint are negated by affidavits and evidentiary materials submitted withthe RAIT Complaint.  On June 14, 2016, RAIT Preferred Funding filed aMemorandum of Law in Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss (“Opposition”)stating that the claims in the RAIT Complaint were properly stated.  OnJune 30, 2016, CWCAM filed a reply in support of the Motion to Dismiss and inresponse to the Opposition, stating that each of CWCAM’s arguments is supportedby the express language of the agreements between the parties, the documentaryevidence and New York case law.  On September 30, 2016, RAIT PreferredFunding and CWCAM entered into a confidential Settlement Agreement (the “2016Settlement”), which provides for a stay of the RAIT Preferred Fundinglitigation (the “Litigation Stay”) through August 25, 2017. Pursuant to the terms of the 2016 Settlement, upon satisfaction of a term ofthe 2016 Settlement by August 25, 2017 (or such later date agreed to by theparties), the RAIT Preferred Funding litigation will be dismissed, withprejudice.  On May 19, 2017 the Borrower repaid the Loan in accordancewith the terms of the notes and satisfied the condition to dismissal withprejudice.  RAIT has refused to dismiss the case and is claiming that theB Note should be paid in full.  CWCAM believes that it has performed itsobligations under the Operative Agreements in good faith, and that the actionshould be dismissed with prejudice.  On August 29, 2017, the RAIT Courtgranted leave to RAIT Preferred Funding to amend its complaint.  OnSeptember 20, 2017, RAIT Preferred Funding filed an Amended Complaint (the “RAITAmended Complaint”), which omits its original claims, adds Wells Fargo Bankas a defendant, and seeks (a) specific performance requiring repayment of the$18,500,000 principal amount of the B Note or, in the alternative, monetarydamages, including the $18,500,000 principal amount of the B Note, in an amountto be determined at trial, (b) monetary damages on any fees paid to CWCAM asspecial servicer or Wells Fargo Bank as master servicer in connection with theborrower’s repayment of the Loan, (c) a declaratory judgment that RAITPreferred Funding is entitled to recover the full $18,500,000 principal amountof the B Note, (d) punitive damages against CWCAM, and (e) other things. On October 11, 2017, CWCAM filed a motion to dismiss the RAIT Amended Complaint(“CWCAM Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint”) stating that the RAITAmended Complaint did not state a claim and the essential facts of the RAITAmended Complaint are negated by the Operative Agreements and other admissibleevidentiary materials.  On November 13, 2017, Wells Fargo Bank filed amotion to dismiss the RAIT Amended Complaint (the “Wells Fargo Motion toDismiss Amended Complaint”) and joined the CWCAM Motion to Dismiss AmendedComplaint.  On January 29, 2018, the court dismissed all claims but forbreach of contract and discovery has commenced.  CWCAM filed a Motion forSummary Judgement on March 18, 2019.   This matter was settled andthe case dismissed on May 15, 2019.

**Item 1119 of Regulation AB, Affiliations and CertainRelationships and Related Transactions.**

The information regarding this Item has been previouslyprovided in a prospectus supplement of the Registrant relating to the issuingentity filed on November 30, 2015 pursuant to Rule 424(b)(5).

**Item 1122 of Regulation AB, Compliance with ApplicableServicing Criteria.**

The reports on assessments of compliance with the servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities and related attestation reports on suchassessments of compliance with respect to the mortgage loans are attachedhereto under Item 15 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Attached as Exhibit AAto the Pooling and Servicing Agreement incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.1to this Annual Report on Form 10-K is a chart identifying the entities participatingin a servicing function for the transaction responsible for each applicableservicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d).

The reports on assessments of compliance with the servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities and related attestation reports on suchassessments of compliance with respect to the New Center One Building MortgageLoan, which is being serviced and administered pursuant to the pooling andservicing agreement for the JPMBB 2015-C32 Transaction, are attached heretounder Item 15 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Attached as Exhibit AA to thepooling and servicing agreement for the JPMBB 2015-C32 Transaction incorporatedby reference as Exhibit 4.2 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K is a chartidentifying the entities participating in a servicing function for the JPMBB2015-C32 Transaction responsible for each applicable servicing criteria setforth in Item 1122(d).

**Item 1123 of Regulation AB, Servicer Compliance Statement.**

The servicer compliance statements are attached as Exhibitsto this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

**PART IV**

**Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules**

(a) The following is a list of documents filed as part ofthis Annual Report on Form 10-K:

(1) Not applicable

(2) Not applicable

(3) See below

 

4.1          Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of November 1,2015, by and among J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., asDepositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer,Torchlight Loan Services, LLC, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Certificate Administrator, Wilmington Trust, NationalAssociation, as Trustee, and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Senior TrustAdvisor (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-Kfiled on November 30, 2015 under Commission File No. 333-190246-18 andincorporated by reference herein).

4.2          Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 1,2015, by and among J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., asDepositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, LNRPartners, LLC, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCertificate Administrator, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee,and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor (filed as Exhibit 4.2to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 30, 2015 underCommission File No. 333-190246-18 and incorporated by reference herein).

4.3          Co-Lender Agreement, dated as of November 17, 2015, byand among JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as Initial Note A-1Holder, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as Initial Note A-2 Holder, JPMorganChase Bank, National Association, as Initial Note A-3 Holder, German AmericanCapital Corporation, as Initial Note A-4 Holder, and German American CapitalCorporation, as Initial Note A-5 Holder (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to theregistrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 30, 2015 underCommission File No. 333-190246-18 and incorporated by reference herein).

4.4          Co-Lender Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2015, byand between JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as Initial Note A-1Holder, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as Initial Note A-2Holder (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filedon November 30, 2015 under Commission File No. 333-190246-18 and incorporatedby reference herein).

4.5          Co-Lender Agreement, dated as of October 29, 2015, by andbetween JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as Initial Note A-1 Holder,and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as Initial Note A-2 Holder(filed as Exhibit 4.5 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November30, 2015 under Commission File No. 333-190246-18 and incorporated by referenceherein).

 

31           Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

33           Reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities.

33.1        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as MasterServicer

33.2        CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicer

33.3        Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee (Omitted. See ExplanatoryNotes.)

33.4        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCertificate Administrator

33.5        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCustodian

33.6        Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor

33.7        CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant

33.8        Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Certificate Administrator on andafter November 1, 2021

33.9        Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian on and after November 1,2021

33.10      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as PrimaryServicer of the 32 Avenue of the Americas Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.1)

33.11      CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicerof the 32 Avenue of the Americas Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.2)

33.12      Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee of the 32 Avenue of theAmericas Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)

33.13      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCustodian of the 32 Avenue of the Americas Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.5)

33.14      Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Senior Trust Advisorof the 32 Avenue of the Americas Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.6)

33.15      CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant of the 32 Avenue of the Americas Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.7)

33.16      Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian on and after November 1,2021 (see Exhibit 33.9)

33.17      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as PrimaryServicer of the DoubleTree Anaheim - Orange County Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit33.1)

33.18      CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicerof the DoubleTree Anaheim - Orange County Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.2)

33.19      Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee of the DoubleTree Anaheim -Orange County Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)

33.20      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCustodian of the DoubleTree Anaheim - Orange County Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit33.5)

33.21      Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Senior Trust Advisorof the DoubleTree Anaheim - Orange County Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.6)

33.22      CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant of the DoubleTree Anaheim - Orange County Mortgage Loan (seeExhibit 33.7)

33.23      Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian on and after November 1,2021 (see Exhibit 33.9)

33.24      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as PrimaryServicer of the New Center One Building Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.1)

33.25      LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer of the New Center One Building MortgageLoan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)

33.26      Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee of the New Center OneBuilding Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)

33.27      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCustodian of the New Center One Building Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.5)

33.28      Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Senior Trust Advisorof the New Center One Building Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.6)

33.29      CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant of the New Center One Building Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.7)

33.30      Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian on and after November 1,2021 (see Exhibit 33.9)

34           Attestationreports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities.

34.1        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as MasterServicer

34.2        CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicer

34.3        Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee (Omitted. See ExplanatoryNotes.)

34.4        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCertificate Administrator

34.5        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCustodian

34.6        Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor

34.7        CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant

34.8        Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Certificate Administrator on andafter November 1, 2021

34.9        Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian on and after November 1,2021

34.10      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as PrimaryServicer of the 32 Avenue of the Americas Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.1)

34.11      CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicerof the 32 Avenue of the Americas Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.2)

34.12      Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee of the 32 Avenue of theAmericas Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)

34.13      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCustodian of the 32 Avenue of the Americas Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.5)

34.14      Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Senior Trust Advisorof the 32 Avenue of the Americas Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.6)

34.15      CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant of the 32 Avenue of the Americas Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.7)

34.16      Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian on and after November 1,2021 (see Exhibit 34.9)

34.17      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as PrimaryServicer of the DoubleTree Anaheim - Orange County Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit34.1)

34.18      CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicerof the DoubleTree Anaheim - Orange County Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.2)

34.19      Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee of the DoubleTree Anaheim -Orange County Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)

34.20      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCustodian of the DoubleTree Anaheim - Orange County Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit34.5)

34.21      Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Senior Trust Advisorof the DoubleTree Anaheim - Orange County Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.6)

34.22      CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant of the DoubleTree Anaheim - Orange County Mortgage Loan (seeExhibit 34.7)

34.23      Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian on and after November 1,2021 (see Exhibit 34.9)

34.24      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as PrimaryServicer of the New Center One Building Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.1)

34.25      LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer of the New Center One Building MortgageLoan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)

34.26      Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee of the New Center OneBuilding Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)

34.27      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCustodian of the New Center One Building Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.5)

34.28      Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Senior Trust Advisorof the New Center One Building Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.6)

34.29      CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing Function Participantof the New Center One Building Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.7)

34.30      Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian on and after November 1,2021 (see Exhibit 34.9)

35           Servicer compliance statements.

35.1        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as MasterServicer

35.2        CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicer

35.3        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCertificate Administrator

35.4        Computershare Trust Company, National Association, asServicing Function Participant for the Certificate Administrator on and afterNovember 1, 2021

35.5        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as PrimaryServicer of the 32 Avenue of the Americas Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 35.1)

35.6        CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicerof the 32 Avenue of the Americas Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 35.2)

35.7        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as PrimaryServicer of the DoubleTree Anaheim - Orange County Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit35.1)

35.8        CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicerof the DoubleTree Anaheim - Orange County Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 35.2)

35.9        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as PrimaryServicer of the New Center One Building Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 35.1)

35.10      LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer of the New Center One Building MortgageLoan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)

99.1         Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of November30, 2015, between J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp. andJPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association (filed as Exhibit 99.1 to theregistrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 30, 2015 underCommission File No. 333-190246-18 and incorporated by reference herein)

99.2         Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 30,2015, between J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp. andBarclays Bank PLC (filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the registrant’s Current Report onForm 8-K filed on November 30, 2015 under Commission File No. 333-190246-18 andincorporated by reference herein)

99.3         Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of November30, 2015, among J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., Ladder CapitalFinance LLC, Ladder Capital Finance Holdings LLLP, Series TRS of Ladder CapitalFinance Holdings LLLP, and Series REIT of Ladder Capital Finance Holdings LLLP(filed as Exhibit 99.3 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed onNovember 30, 2015 under Commission File No. 333-190246-18 and incorporated byreference herein)

99.4         Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of November30, 2015, among J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., RedwoodCommercial Mortgage Corporation and Redwood Trust, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 99.4to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 30, 2015 underCommission File No. 333-190246-18 and incorporated by reference herein)

 (b) The exhibits required to be filed by the Registrant pursuant to Item 601 ofRegulation S-K are listed above.

(c)  Not Applicable.

 

**SIGNATURES**

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report tobe signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

J.P. Morgan Chase CommercialMortgage Securities Corp.(Depositor)

/s/ KunalK. Singh

Kunal K.Singh, President and Chief Executive Officer

(senior officer in charge ofsecuritization of the depositor)

Date: March 21, 2022