alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
114 STAT. 1416 PUBLIC LAW 106–368—OCT. 27, 2000

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3236:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 106–742 (Comm. on Resources).

SENATE REPORTS: No. 106–434 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):

July 25, considered and passed House.

Oct. 13, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 106–368

106th Congress

An Act

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to enter into contracts with the Weber

Basin Water Conservancy District, Utah, to use Weber Basin Project facilities

for the impounding, storage, and carriage of nonproject water for domestic, municipal, industrial, and other beneficial purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the

Secretary of the Interior may enter into contracts with the Weber

Basin Water Conservancy District or any of its member unit contractors under the Act of February 21, 1911 (43 U.S.C. 523), for—

(1) the impounding, storage, and carriage of nonproject

water for domestic, municipal, industrial, and other beneficial

purposes, using facilities associated with the Weber Basin

Project, Utah; and

(2) the exchange of water among Weber Basin Project contractors, for the purposes set forth in paragraph (1), using

facilities associated with the Weber Basin Project, Utah.

Approved October 27, 2000.

Oct. 27, 2000

[H.R. 3236]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>  
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM FORM 10-Q OF BERLITZ INTERNATIONAL, INC. FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>      1,000
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       38,260
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                47,894
<ALLOWANCES>                                  2,389
<INVENTORY>                                   8,526
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            109,804
<PP&E>                                       48,409
<DEPRECIATION>                               17,103
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              671,890
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       102,181
<BONDS>                                           0
<COMMON>                                      1,003
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                  351,002
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                671,890
<SALES>                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            289,582
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               172,064
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              9,826
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            5,504
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              10,722
<INCOME-TAX>                                  7,329
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           2,945
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             (6,285)
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                (3,340)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (0.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (0.35)
        

</TABLE>
#### §§ 17.161-17.169 [Reserved]
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 315.37 Payment during lives of both coowners.

A savings bond registered in coownership form will be paid to either coowner upon surrender with an appropriate request, and, upon payment (as determined in § 315.43), the other coowner will cease to have any interest in the bond. If both coowners request payment and payment is to be made by check, the check will be drawn in the form, “John A. Jones and Mary C. Jones”.
----

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the Proposal for a Council Regulation on the establishment of a Joint Undertaking to develop the new generation European Air Traffic Management System (SESAR)

COM(2005) 602 final — 2005/0235 (CNS)

(2006/C 309/27)

On 4 January 2006 the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 171 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the abovementioned proposal.

The Section for Transport, Energy, Infrastructure and the Information Society, which was responsible for preparing the Committee's work on the subject, adopted its opinion on 30 May 2006. The rapporteur was Mr McDonogh.

At its 428th plenary session, held on 5 and 6 July 2006 (meeting of 6 July 2006), the European Economic and Social Committee adopted the following opinion by 37 votes to one with three abstentions.

1.   Introduction

2.   Recommendations and comments

Brussels, 6 July 2006.

The President

of the European Economic and Social Committee

Anne-Marie SIGMUND

----
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 14

- 00342

- CR

DERIK MCLENNAN

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the County Court at Law No 1
McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- 5025

- CR1

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Derik McLennan attempts to appeal from his conviction entered in the County

Court at Law #1 in McLennan, County. The sentence was imposed on August 6, 2014,

and McLennan filed his notice of appeal in the County Clerk’s office on November 10,

2014. The notice of appeal must be filed within 90 days after the date sentence is

imposed or suspended in open court if the defendant timely files a motion for new trial.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 26.2(a)(2). McLennan’s notice of appeal is untimely. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

.

26.2(a)(2 ).McLennan v. State Page 2

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. 1

AL SCOGGINS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,
Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed November 20, 2014 Do not publish
[CR25]

1 A motion for rehearing may be filed within 15 days after the judgment or order of this Court is

rendered. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 49.1. If the appellant desires to have the decision of this Court reviewed by filing a petition for discretionary review, that petition must be filed in the Court of Criminal Appeals within 30 days after either the day the court of appeals’ judgment was rendered or the day the last timely motion for rehearing was overruled by the court of appeals. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 68.2 (a).
(November 10, 2005)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ronnie Cunningham, Appellant.

[803 NYS2d 788]

Cardona, P.J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Franklin County (Main, Jr., J.), rendered July 21, 1997, which revoked defendant’s probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

*755In June 1996, defendant was convicted of burglary in the third degree and sentenced to a five-year period of probation. In April 1997, he was charged with violating two conditions of his probation after he failed to successfully complete an alcohol and substance abuse treatment program and was arrested for second degree rape, second degree sodomy and endangering the welfare of a child. A fact-finding hearing was subsequently conducted on the violation petition. Because he was convicted in May 1997 of sexual misconduct as a result of the behavior leading to his April 1997 arrest, defendant pleaded guilty to violating the condition of his probation requiring him to remain arrest and conviction free. In return, the prosecution agreed to recommend a sentence of one year in jail. County Court, however, declined to follow the prosecution’s recommendation and sentenced him to 1 to 3 years in prison.

Defendant’s sole contention on appeal is that his plea was not knowingly, voluntarily or intelligently entered into because he was under the influence of phenobarbital at the time and County Court failed to make an appropriate inquiry to ascertain that he fully understood the proceedings. Initially, we note that insofar as defendant failed to move to withdraw the plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction, he has not preserved his claim for our review (see *People v Sharlow,*12 AD3d 724, 725 [2004], *lv denied*4 NY3d 748 [2004]; *People v Keyes,*300 AD2d 909, 909-910 [2002]). Moreover, the exception to the preservation requirement is not applicable as defendant’s factual recitation did not cast significant doubt on his guilt thereby imposing an obligation upon the court to make a further inquiry (see *People v Keyes, supra*at 910; *People v Jaworski,*296 AD2d 597, 598 [2002]). In any event, defendant’s argument is without merit. County Court questioned defendant when he indicated during the plea proceedings that he was taking phenobarbital and he responded that it was prescribed for seizures. Defendant further provided coherent answers to County Court’s other questions and stated that he was entering his plea voluntarily and without coercion. Under these circumstances, we conclude that defendant’s guilty plea was not affected by his medication *(see People v Fuller,*245 AD2d 987 [1997], *lv denied*91 NY2d 941 [1998]; *People v Passero,*222 AD2d 858, 859 [1995], *lv denied*88 NY2d 851 [1996]; *People v Ackerman,*199 AD2d 576 [1993], *lv denied*83 NY2d 848 [1994]).

Mercure, Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
September 20, 2016

Exemption No. 15254B

Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–6303

Mr. Anthony Longo

Bell Air LLC

11 Estes Street

Ipswich, MA 01938

Dear Mr. Longo:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition for an amendment. It explains 

the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists any changes to the original conditions 

and limitations.

By letter posted to the public docket on July 22, 2016, you petitioned the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) on behalf of Bell Air LLC (hereinafter petitioner or operator) for an 

amendment to your current exemption. That exemption from §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 

61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows the petitioner to conduct UAS operations. You 

requested an amendment to change the company name from BirdsEye Cinematography to

Bell Air LLC.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested amendment to the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner. 

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 15254A

remains valid and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority contained 
2

in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, the operator is 

granted an amendment to change the operator name.

The operator shall add this amendment to its original exemption.

 

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of amendment, Bell Air LLC is hereafter referred to as the operator. All 

conditions and limitations within Grant of Exemption No. 15254A remain in effect.

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be 

grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption. 

This exemption terminates on March 31, 2018, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Director, Flight Standards Service
EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                               BIRCH BRANCH, INC.
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Birch Branch, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Earnest
Mathis, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Earnest Mathis
------------------
Earnest Mathis
President
May 31, 2007







<PAGE>
IA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 61

Naming the CVN–76 aircraft carrier as the U.S.S. Ronald Reagan.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 23, 1995

Mr. DORNAN (for himself, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, and Mr. CALLAHAN) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on National Security

JOINT RESOLUTION

Naming the CVN–76 aircraft carrier as the U.S.S. Ronald

Reagan.

Whereas President Ronald Reagan served his country with

honor and distinction as the 40th President of the United

States;

Whereas President Reagan initiated defense policies that restored the military power and prestige of the United

States;

Whereas President Reagan’s policy of peace through

strength, invigorated by an increase and strengthening of

the Armed Forces of the United States under his leadership, led to the demise of Soviet bloc communism and the

expansion of democracy around the world;
2

•HJ 61 IH

Whereas President Reagan made a lifelong commitment to

rallying the free world to support men and women elsewhere around the world who are struggling to obtain

freedom and democracy;

Whereas President Reagan in every way honored the men

and women who have volunteered to wear the uniforms

of the Armed Forces of the United States;

Whereas President Reagan kept faith with the men and

women veterans of service in the Armed Forces of the

United States;

Whereas President Reagan served as Commander in Chief of

the Armed Forces of the United States with unmatched

dignity, style, and grace;

Whereas President Reagan supported a strong Navy and a

global United States military presence; and

Whereas President Reagan paid homage to, and symbolized,

the American Dream: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the CVN–76, a nuclear powered aircraft carrier of

4 the Navy, shall be named the U.S.S. Ronald Reagan.

Æ
#### In the Matter of the Assignment of Israel Yeager *et al.*to Henry Eisner for the Benefit of Creditors.

[Special Term.]

(Decided June 25th, 1878.)

Until there has been an accounting by an assignee for the benefit of creditors, the assignee and the sureties on his bond will not be discharged, even after a composition by all the creditors.

Application by an assignee under a general assignment for the benefit of creditors for the discharge of himself and the sureties on 1ns bond.

The application was made upon the petition of Henry Eisner, the assignee, showing that a composition agreement had been signed by all the creditors of the assignors, Israel Yeager and Seligman Bauer, that they had all received the amounts payable to them respectively upon the composition, and had consented in writing that the assignee reconvey to the assignors the assigned property; and the petitioner asked leave so to reconvey, and that he and his sureties should be discharged. No notice to creditors to present their claims to the assignee appeared to have been published.

Van Hoesen, J.

On this application the release can only be from liability to the compounding creditors, who appear and who have been cited to appear on this application. If the bond is to be cancelled and the sureties discharged, there must be an accounting. It will be merely formal, perhaps, but it *8must be had. The court will not discharge the bond, except after an accounting.

Application denied.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 223.19 Treasury-initiated revocation proceedings. Whenever Treasury has reason to believe that a company is not complying with the requirements of 31 U.S.C. 9304-9308 and/or the regulations under this part, including but not limited to a failure to satisfy corporate and financial standards, Treasury shall: ( a ) Notify the company of the facts or conduct which indicate such non-compliance, and provide the company an opportunity to respond, and
( b ) Revoke a company's certificate of authority after providing notice to the company if: ( 1 ) The company does not respond satisfactorily to Treasury's notification of non-compliance, or
( 2 ) The company responded, was provided an opportunity to demonstrate or achieve compliance, and failed to do so.
[79 FR 62001, Oct. 16, 2014, as amended at 89 FR 48837, June 10, 2024]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Nadja B., Appellant.

[805 NYS2d 549]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Resnik, J.), rendered July 20, 2004, convicting her of burglary in the second degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing a determinate sentence of SVs years’ imprisonment.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, the conviction is deemed vacated and replaced with a finding that the defendant is a youthful offender *(see*CPL 720.20 [3]), and the sentence is reduced to a period of six months’ imprisonment to run concurrently with, and as a condition of, a term of five years’ probation, and the matter is remitted to County Court, Rockland County, to set the terms and conditions of probation, if any.

Under the particular circumstances of this case “the interests of justice would be served by relieving the [defendant] from the onus of a criminal record” (CPL 720.20 [1] [a]). The sentence imposed is excessive to the extent indicated. H. Miller, J.P., Cozier, Ritter and Dillon, JJ., concur.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 250.3 Voucher applications. ( a ) *Execution of voucher by person named.* No payment of any part of the amount due on account of an award will be made unless a voucher application therefor properly executed (preferably in ink or indelible pencil) is received by the Treasury Department. A voucher application for each payment on account of an award must be signed by each person whose name appears on such voucher application as payee exactly as his name appears thereon, with the following two exceptions: ( 1 ) If only the name of the payee, and not his identity, has changed, the payee shall sign the voucher application with his changed name and return it to the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, Treasury Department, Hyattsville, MD 20782; the voucher application shall be accompanied by an explanatory affidavit and appropriate supporting documents, e.g., a copy of a marriage certificate or court order of change of name.
( 2 ) If the identity of the payee has changed, paragraph (b) of this section shall apply. A signature by mark (X) must be witnessed by two persons; the signature and address of each must appear on the voucher application. In the case of a corporation the voucher application must be signed by an appropriate officer thereof having authority to do so, whose authority to sign on behalf of the corporation must be duly certified to thereon over the seal of the corporation.
( b ) *Execution of voucher by other person.* If the person named in the voucher application as payee is no longer the proper person to receive the payment by reason of assignment, incompetency or death, or of termination of a partnership or corporation named, the voucher shall be executed by the person entitled to payment as provided in 250.4 and returned to the Credit Accounting Branch with the relevant information and the appropriate supporting documents required by that section.
[31 FR 9418, July 9, 1966, as amended at 49 FR 47001, Nov. 30, 1984; 58 FR 4578, Jan. 15, 1993]
Exhibit 35.11



LOGO

2016 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)

Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the Pooling and Servicing Agreement) dated as of November 1, 2016 by and among Citigroup Commercial Mortgage
Securities, Inc. as Depositor, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc. as Operating Advisor and Asset
Representations Reviewer, Citibank, N.A. as Certificate Administrator, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as Trustee, relating to the Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2016-C3, Commercial Mortgage
Pass-through Certificates, Series 2016-C3 (CGCMT 2016-C3)

The
undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the Special Servicer) herein certifies to the following:



| | 1. | All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of November 17, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the Reporting Period), under the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects throughout the Reporting
Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof has been specifically identified herein.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|              |  |                                |  |  |  |                    
|------------- |  | ------------------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------
|Certified by: |  | /s/ Adam Singer                |  |  |  | Date: March 1, 2017
|              |  | Adam Singer, Managing Director |  |  |  |