alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.6096-1 Designation by individuals for taxable years beginning after December 31, 1972. ( a ) *In general.* Every individual (other than a nonresident alien) whose income tax liability, as defined in paragraph (b) of this section, is one dollar or more may, at his option, designate that one dollar shall be paid over to the Presidential Election Campaign Fund, in accordance with the provisions of section 9006. In the case of a joint return of a husband and wife, each spouse may designate that one dollar be paid to the fund as provided in this paragraph only if the joint income tax liability of the husband and wife is two dollars or more.
( b ) *Income tax liability.* For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, the income tax liability of an individual for any taxable year is the amount of the tax imposed by chapter 1 on such individual for the taxable year (as shown on his or her return) reduced by the sum of the credits (as shown on his or her return) allowable under sections 33, 37, 38, 40, 41, 42, 44, and 44A.
( c ) *Manner and time of designation.* ( 1 ) A designation under paragraph (a) of this section may be made with respect to any taxable year at the time of the filing of the return of the tax imposed by chapter 1 for such taxable year, and shall be made either on the first page of the return or on the page bearing the taxpayer's signature, in accordance with the instructions applicable thereto.
( 2 ) With respect to any taxable year beginning after December 31, 1972 for which no designation was made under paragraph (c)(1) of this section, a designation may be made on the form furnished by the Internal Revenue Service for such purpose, filed within 20 and one half months after the due date for the original return for such taxable year. In the case of a joint return where neither spouse made a designation or where only one spouse made a designation, a designation may be made, as provided in this subparagraph, by the spouse or spouses who had not previously made a designation.
( 3 ) A designation once made, whether by an original return or otherwise, may not be revoked.
( d ) *Effective date.* This section shall apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1972.
[T.D. 7304, 39 FR 4476, Feb. 4, 1974, as amended by T.D. 7643, 44 FR 50338, Aug. 28, 1979] Miscellaneous provisions
#### In the Matter of the Assignment of Worthley for the Benefit of Creditors.

[Special Term.]

In the decree entered upon the final accounting of an assignee for the benefit of creditors, all amounts to be paid must be specified.

Allowances for legal services rendered to the assignee, are made to the assignee and not to counsel.

Application for a decree upon the final accounting of an assignee under a general assignment for the benefit of creditors.

Van Hoesen, J.

I will not sign the proposed decree. The amounts must be specified. No such looseness can be permitted as the proposed decree makes .possible. It is .not enough *13that the amounts are small, and the counsel reputable. If this decree is signed, it becomes a precedent, and it may result in loss to some estate where the parties are .different from those wno propose this decree.

Again, I cannot allow anything to Lindsay & Flammer. The allowance is to the assignee, and is made as one of the expenses of his execution of the trust.

There will be no difficulty in having a proper decree signed.
Exhibit 35.5



|     |  |                                                                                                          
|---- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1050-084, 8th Fl
401 South Tryon Street Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2016, by and among DEUTSCHE
MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, WELLS FARGO BANK,
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-CD2 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 10.11 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify
that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from December 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such
period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of
February 2017.



|                        
|------------------------
|LOGO                    
|Daniel Bober            
|Executive Vice President
|Wells Fargo Bank        



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
NO. 07-05-0142-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

NOVEMBER 29, 2005

______________________________

TERRY L. MATTHEWS, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. ONE OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 2004-487343; HONORABLE L.B. RUSTY LADD, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before REAVIS and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

ABATEMENT AND REMAND

Following a plea of not guilty, appellant Terry L. Matthews was convicted by a jury

of driving while intoxicated, enhanced by a prior conviction for driving while intoxicated, and

punishment was assessed at 120 days confinement in the county jail. Both the clerk’s

record and reporter’s record have been filed. Appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed
2

on August 24, 2005. Three extensions of time have been granted and the brief has yet to

be filed. Retained counsel was notified by letter dated October 25, 2005, that failure to file

the brief by November 9, 2005, would result in application of Rule 38.8(b) of the Texas

Rules of Appellate Procedure. Counsel did not respond and the brief remains outstanding.

Therefore, we now abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for

further proceedings pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) and (3) of the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure. Upon remand, the trial court shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be

given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to determine the following: 

1. whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal;

2. whether appellant is indigent and entitled to appointed counsel;

3. whether retained counsel for appellant has abandoned the appeal;

and

4. whether appellant has been denied effective assistance of counsel 

given counsel’s failure to file a brief.

The trial court shall cause a hearing to be transcribed. Should it be determined that

appellant does want to continue the appeal and the court determines that present counsel

should be replaced, the name, address, telephone number, and state bar number of the

newly-appointed or newly-retained counsel shall be provided to the Clerk of this Court.

Finally, the trial court shall execute findings of fact, conclusions of law, and any necessary

orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues and cause its findings and

conclusions to be included in a supplemental clerk's record. A supplemental record of the
3

hearing shall also be included in the appellate record. Finally, the trial court shall file the

supplemental clerk's record and the supplemental reporter's record with the Clerk of this

Court by Friday, December 30, 2005.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1015

To provide for the temporary suspension of the reformulated gasoline rules

under the Clean Air Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 22, 1995

Mr. KLECZKA (for himself, Mr. BARRETT of Wisconsin, Mr. PETRI, and Mr.

SENSENBRENNER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To provide for the temporary suspension of the reformulated

gasoline rules under the Clean Air Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF REFORMULATED GASOLINE

4 RULES.

5 Upon the enactment of this Act, the Environmental

6 Protection Agency rules under section 211(k) of the Clean

7 Air Act shall be suspended. Such suspension shall remain

8 in effect until such time as the Administrator—

9 (1) demonstrates, after notice and opportunity

10 for hearing, that reformulated gasoline manufac-
2

•HR 1015 IH

1 tured and distributed in accordance with such rules

2 does not cause adverse health effects; or

3 (2) revises such rules to eliminate any such ad4 verse health effects, and

5 submits a report to the appropriate committees of Con6 gress setting forth the steps taken under paragraph (1)

7 or (2).

Æ
#### § 601.508 Dispute between recognized representatives of a taxpayer.

Where there is a dispute between two or more recognized representatives concerning who is entitled to represent a taxpayer in a matter pending before the Internal Revenue Service (or to receive a check drawn on the United States Treasury), the Internal Revenue Service will not recognize any party. However, if the contesting recognized representatives designate one or more of their number under the terms of an agreement signed by all, the Internal Revenue Service will recognize such designated recognized representatives upon receipt of a copy of such agreement according to the terms of the power of attorney.

[56 FR 24009, May 28, 1991]
39802.

#### ROOKS v. WHITE et al.

Russell, Judge.

The bill of exceptions assigning error on the judgment of the trial court sustaining the defendants’ motion for summary judgment recites that at the hearing on said motion “defendants introduced testimony and records of the Workmen’s Compensation Board of the State of Georgia which were considered by the court.” It further specifies as material to a clear understanding of the errors complained of a copy of the record of the proceedings before the Workmen’s Compensation Board and copy of a designated petition filed by the plaintiff in the Superior Court of Fulton County. The record certified by the Clerk of the Superior Court of DeKalb County and attached to the bill of exceptions fails to include this documentary evidence, but on the contrary recites that it does not appear as a part of the record in the case in the trial court. Further, the certificate of the trial court recites that the bill of exceptions specifies all material necessary to a clear understanding of the errors complained of “except a brief of the evidence introduced at the hearing on motion for summary judgment on July 2, 1962.” It thus affirmatively appears that evidence was introduced at the hearing resulting *85in the judgment complained of; that such evidence is not in the record before this court, and that it was considered both by the trial judge and the plaintiff in error to be material to a consideration of the errors complained of. It follows that in the absence of a brief of evidence this court cannot reach any decision on the merits of the appeal.

Decided November 29, 1962.

*George F. Wheeler, Jr., William M. Redman, Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*Glenn Frick, Lokey & Bowden, Hamilton Lokey,*contra.

When the error assigned cannot be determined without a consideration of evidence, and the bill of exceptions neither contains nor specifies a brief of evidence as a part of the record in the case, the proper judgment is not a dismissal of the writ of error but an affirmance of the judgment of the trial court. *Code Ann.*§ 70-301.1; *Whitner v. Whitner,*207 Ga. 97, 100 (60 SE2d 464); *Pierce v. Felts,*146 Ga. 716 (92 SE 212); *White v. Hornsby,*191 Ga. 462 (2) (12 SE2d 875); *Walker v. Hamilton,*209 Ga. 735, 738 (76 SE2d 12); *Lewis*& *Matthews v. Sams & Son,*22 Ga. App. 222 (95 SE 764).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Carlisle, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.*
4/22/2015 TDCJ Offender Details 

### Ea^j.ij^uiuM.iJ.yiMJMMiL-ya TDCJ Home B5S New Offender Search



# Offender Information Details 

# ~n moz-Wj>

Return to Search list

SID Number: TDCJ Number: Name: Race: Gender: DOB: Maximum Sentence Date: 

### Current Facility: Projected Release Date: Parole Eligibility Date: Offender Visitation Eligible: 05608874 01957729 HARPER.DARRELL B M 1963-07-24 2017-01-30 ELLIS 2017-01-30 NOT AVAILABLE YES 

### Informationprovidedis updated once daily during weekdays and multipletimes perday on visitation days. Because this information is subject to change, family members and 

### friends are encouragedto callthe unitpriorto travelingfor a visit

SPECIAL INFORMATION FOR SCHEDULED RELEASE: Scheduled Release Date: 

### Scheduled Release Type: Scheduled Release Location: 

# Parole Review Information Offender is not scheduled for release at this time. Will be determined when release date is scheduled. Will be determined when release date is scheduled.

Offense History: 

### Offense r»««„e« Sentence nniinUl raea Mn Sentence (YY-MW1-



# Date 0ffense Date County CaseNo" DD)
2010-06-22 TERRORISTIC THREAT 2012-01-27 TRAVIS D-1-DC-11- 904087 6-00-00 D-1-DC-11- http://offender.tdcj.state.tx.us/OffenderSearch/offenderDetail.action?sid=05608874 1/2
#### In the Matter of Margaret Hiler, Respondent, v Board of Education of the Byron-Bergen Central School District, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[804 NYS2d 283]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Genesee County (Robert C. Noonan, A.J.), entered August 4, 2004 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment, inter alia, granted the petition to the extent of directing respondent to provide petitioner copay benefits equivalent to active employees.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court. Present—Green, J.P., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Gorski, JJ.
ex10-8.htm


 


Exhibit 10.8










Service Agreement


And


Directors Fee (LCGRC)












CANYON GOLD CORP. (CGCC) herewith engages the Services of Harold Schneider (Schneider) to assist EMAC Handels AG with the dissemination of the Financials Statements and all pertinent documentation as required by CGCC’s auditors for the Company’s Quarterly and Annual filings.







Schneider shall be paid as follows:








	
a)  

	
Starting on May 01, 2011








	
b)  

	
A monthly fee of $ 2,500.00












In the event that CGCC is not able to make the cash payments as given in a) and b) above, the fees shall be accrued as payable on the books of the company and shall be paid at the earliest possible time.







The common stock of the company shall be issued to Schneider within 30 days from completion of a one year service and or within 30 days from termination of the service by Schneider to CGCC.







No Interest consideration on any accrued payable.







In addition to above Harold Schneider shall be paid a Directors Fees totalling $ 7,500.00 for his service as President and Director of Long Canyon Gold Resources Corp. for the period May 2011 to Dec. 2011.







Agreed to and signed this 30th day of April 2011.







CANYON GOLD CORP.







/s/Delbert Blewett


Delbert Blewett, President & CEO







Harold Schneider
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 91 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 91

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
allow the States to limit the period of time United States Senators and 
                       Representatives may serve.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 1995

   Mr. Sanford introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
allow the States to limit the period of time United States Senators and 
                       Representatives may serve.
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section  1. Each State or the people thereof may prescribe the 
maximum number of terms to which a person may be elected or appointed 
to the Senate of the United States.
    ``Section  2. Each State or the people thereof may prescribe the 
maximum number of terms to which a person may be elected to the House 
of Representatives of the United States.
    ``Section  3. This article shall become inoperative unless it shall 
have been ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 
States within seven years from the date of its submission to the States 
by the Congress.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1026.520 Special information sharing procedures to deter money laundering and terrorist activity for futures commission merchants and introducing brokers in commodities. ( a ) Refer to § 1010.520 of this chapter.
( b ) [Reserved]
Exhibit 31.4

CERTIFICATION

I, Michael J. Rispoli,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Newmark Group, Inc.
for the year ended December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report.



/S/ MICHAEL J. RISPOLIMichael J. RispoliChief Financial OfficerDate: April 30, 2018
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**Certification of Chief FinancialOfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

** **

In connection with theQuarterly  Report on Form 10-Q ofMerit Medical Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31,2009 (the “Report”), I, Kent W. Stanger, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of myknowledge:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: May  8, 2009 |   | /s/ Kent W. Stanger                                    |
|-------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                    |   | Kent W. Stanger                                        |
|                    |   | Chief Financial Officer  (principal financial officer) |

 

This certificationaccompanies the foregoing Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 andshall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, bedeemed filed by the Registrant for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  A signed original of thiscertification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by theCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

 

----
Exhibit No. 32.1
Form 10-QSB
Universal Express, Inc.
File No. 0-18094



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Express, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Richard Altomare, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: November 21, 2005             By:  /s/ Richard Altomare
                                          --------------------------
                                          Richard Altomare
                                          Chief Executive Officer and
                                          Chief Accounting Officer


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.





                                      -17-