alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1.66-1 Treatment of community income. ( a ) *In general.* Married individuals domiciled in a community property state who do not elect to file a joint individual Federal income tax return under section 6013 generally must report half of the total community income earned by the spouses during the taxable year except at times when one of the following exceptions applies: ( 1 ) The spouses live apart and meet the qualifications of § 1.66-2.
( 2 ) The Secretary denies a spouse the Federal income tax benefits resulting from community property law under § 1.66-3, because that spouse acted as if solely entitled to the income and failed to notify his or her spouse of the nature and amount of the income prior to the due date for the filing of his or her spouse's return.
( 3 ) A requesting spouse qualifies for traditional relief from the Federal income tax liability resulting from the operation of community property law under § 1.66-4(a).
( 4 ) A requesting spouse qualifies for equitable relief from the Federal income tax liability resulting from the operation of community property law under § 1.66-4(b).
( b ) *Applicability.* ( 1 ) The rules of this section apply only to community income, as defined by state law. The rules of this section do not apply to income that is not community income. Thus, the rules of this section do not apply to income from property that was formerly community property, but in accordance with state law, has ceased to be community property, becoming, e.g., separate property or property held by joint tenancy or tenancy in common.
( 2 ) When taxpayers report income under paragraph (a) of this section, *all* community income for the calendar year is treated in accordance with the rules provided by section 879(a). Unlike the other provisions under section 66, section 66(a) does not permit inclusion on an item-by-item basis.
( c ) *Transferee liability.* The provisions of section 66 do not negate liability that arises under the operation of other laws. Therefore, a spouse who is not subject to Federal income tax on community income may nevertheless remain liable for the unpaid tax (including additions to tax, penalties, and interest) to the extent provided by Federal or state transferee liability or property laws (other than community property laws). For the rules regarding the liability of transferees, see sections 6901 through 6904 and the regulations thereunder.
[T.D. 9074, 68 FR 41070, July 10, 2003]
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 08, 2020.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, September 08, 2020

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A21D0035. ARTURO GRISALES v. DIANA GRISALES.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

20F005200
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-1817

EDDIE LAREECE PITTMAN, 

 Plaintiff – Appellant, 

 v. 

HUNT CONSTRUCTION GROUP, (in care of CEO Robert G. Hunt), in 

its official capacity, 

 Defendant – Appellee, 

 and 

CHRIS ARMSTRONG, Manager for Hunt Project in Chapel Hill, in 

his official capacity; BILLY STEWARD, Superintendent of Hunt 

Project in Chapel Hill, in his official capacity, 

 Defendants. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, 

District Judge. (4:07-cv-00001-D) 

Submitted: January 15, 2009 Decided: January 21, 2009 

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Eddie LaReece Pittman, Appellant Pro Se. Nicole A. Crawford, 

BROOKS, PIERCE, MCLENDON, HUMPHREY & LEONARD, Greensboro, North 
Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

2 
3 

PER CURIAM: 

Eddie LaReece Pittman appeals the district court’s 

order denying relief on his civil action alleging employment 

discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act 

of 1964, as amended. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Pittman v. Hunt Constr. Group, No. 4:07-

cv-00001-D (E.D.N.C. June 26, 2008). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
#### § 19.525 Whom do I ask if I have questions about a person in the EPLS?

If you have questions about a person in the *EPLS,* ask the point of contact for the Federal agency that placed the person's name into the *EPLS.* You may find the agency point of contact from the *EPLS.*
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 2023

- 1726

_____________________________ S TEVEN D AWAYNE B ANKS , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. John F. Simon, Jr. , Judge

. April 16, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. B.L. T HOMAS , R AY , and K ELSEY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Steven Dawayne Banks, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 202.3 Authorization. ( a ) *To accept deposits covered by the appropriate Federal or State insurer.* Every depositary is authorized to accept a deposit of public money in an official account, other than an account in the name of the United States Treasury, in which the maximum balance does not exceed the “Recognized Insurance Coverage.” “Recognized Insurance Coverage” means the insurance provided by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the National Credit Union Administration, and by insurance organizations specifically qualified by the Secretary of the Treasury.
( b ) *To perform other services.* ( 1 ) The Secretary of the Treasury may authorize a depositary to perform other services including, but not limited to: ( i ) The maintenance of official accounts in which balances will be in excess of the applicable Federal or State insurance coverage;
( ii ) The maintenance of accounts in the name of the United States Treasury;
( iii ) The acceptance of deposits for credit of the United States Treasury;
( iv ) The furnishing of bank drafts in exchange for collections.
( 2 ) To obtain authorization to perform services, a depositary must: ( i ) File with the Secretary of the Treasury an appropriate agreement and resolution of its board of directors authorizing the agreement (both on forms prescribed by the Bureau of the Fiscal Service and available from Federal Reserve Banks), and
( ii ) Pledge collateral security as provided for in § 202.6.
[32 FR 14215, Oct. 13, 1967, as amended at 44 FR 53066, Sept. 11, 1979; 49 FR 47001, Nov. 30, 1984; 62 FR 45521, Aug. 27, 1997]
Franklin Credit Management Corporation 10-12G


Exhibit 10.14


Exhibit 4.1 

RELEASE,
CANCELLATION AND DISCHARGE
OF
LIMITED RECOURSE
GUARANTY
OF
FRANKLIN CREDIT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION


KNOW ALL MEN BY
THESE PRESENTS: 

WHEREAS, FRANKLIN CREDIT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
(“FCMC”), entered into a Limited Recourse Guaranty dated March 31,
2009 (the “Guaranty”), with THE HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK, as
administrative agent (in such capacity, the “Administrative Agent”) for
the Lenders (as defined below), to guarantee the payment of the obligations of
Franklin Credit Asset Corporation, Tribeca Lending Corp. and their Subsidiaries
as borrowers (collectively the “Borrowers”, pursuant to (a) a
certain Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among the Borrowers, the
financial institutions party thereto from time to time as lenders (each, a
“Lender”, and, collectively, the “Lenders”), and the
Administrative Agent, dated as of March 31, 2009, and all amendments,
modifications, and supplements thereto from time to time, and (b) various
promissory notes executed by the Borrowers dated various dates; and 

WHEREAS, the Administrative Agent wishes to release, cancel
and discharge the Guaranty. 

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the
receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Administrative Agent does hereby
release, cancel and discharge Franklin Credit Management Corporation from all of
its duties and obligations to the Administrative Agent and the Lenders under the
Guaranty, and the Guaranty is hereby released, cancelled and discharged. 



 










 




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Administrative Agent has caused
this instrument to be executed in its corporate name, by its duly authorized
officer as of the 22nd day of September,
2010. 


	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	THE HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK,
as
      Administrative Agent	 	 
	
       
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
       
	 	By: 	/s/ David L. Abshier 	 	 
	
       
	 	 	Its:	  Authorized Signer	 	 
	
       
	 	 	 	
       
	 	 



AGREED AND
CONSENTED: 

FRANKLIN CREDIT
HOLDING CORPORATION 


	 	 	 	 	 
	
      By:
	 	/s/ Thomas J. Axon	 	 
	
       
	 	
      /s/
       
Thomas J. Axon, President
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

August 8, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136175 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

AUTO CLUB GROUP INSURANCE Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, COMPANY, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 136175 

 COA: 279537 

Midland CC: 06-001195-CK 

ZACHARIAH M. BRALEY, a developmentally 

disabled person, by his court-appointed guardian, 

ROBERT J. BRALEY, JR., MIDLAND 

COUNTY EDUCATION SERVICE AGENCY,

MIDLAND PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT, 

MARK MOODY, MICHELLE RENEE MILLER,

WAYNE STUART DRAVES, CHRISTOPHER 

COLIN MOE, JAMES ROBERT MOE, and 

SANDRA ELAINE MOE,

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Chief Justice, a stipulation signed by counsel for the parties 

agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the 

application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs. 

p0806 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

August 8, 2008 

Clerk
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Properties III
L.P. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 29, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Neal Ludeke, Chief Financial Officer of Richman Housing Credits
Inc., general partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties III L.P., general partner
of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant
to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrant.



/s/ Neal Ludeke
----------------------------------------------
Neal Ludeke
Chief Financial Officer of Richman Housing
Credits Inc., general partner of Richman
Tax Credit Properties III L.P., general partner
of the Registrant
November 13, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 158 (Tuesday, August 18, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 41710]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19787]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2008-N-0354]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office 
of Management and Budget Approval; Mental Models Study of Farmers' 
Understanding and Implementation of Good Agricultural Practices

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information entitled ``Mental Models Study of Farmers' 
Understanding and Implementation of Good Agricultural Practices'' has 
been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel Gittleson, Office of 
Information Management (HFA-710), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fabe9b94939f96d4bd938e8e969f899594ba9c9e9bd4929289d49d958c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5e1a3f30373b327019372a2a323b2d31301e383a3f7036362d70393128">[email protected]</span></a>, 301-
796-5156.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of March 24, 2009 
(74 FR 12364), the agency announced that the proposed information 
collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 
U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays 
a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the 
information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0639. 
The approval expires on July 31, 2012. A copy of the supporting 
statement for this information collection is available on the Internet 
at http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.

    Dated: August 11, 2009.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. E9-19787 Filed 8-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 19.630 May the Department of the Treasury impute conduct of one person to another? For purposes of actions taken under this rule, we may impute conduct as follows: ( a ) *Conduct imputed from an individual to an organization.* We may impute the fraudulent, criminal, or other improper conduct of any officer, director, shareholder, partner, employee, or other individual associated with an organization, to that organization when the improper conduct occurred in connection with the individual's performance of duties for or on behalf of that organization, or with the organization's knowledge, approval or acquiescence. The organization's acceptance of the benefits derived from the conduct is evidence of knowledge, approval or acquiescence.
( b ) *Conduct imputed from an organization to an individual, or between individuals.* We may impute the fraudulent, criminal, or other improper conduct of any organization to an individual, or from one individual to another individual, if the individual to whom the improper conduct is imputed either participated in, had knowledge of, or reason to know of the improper conduct.
( c ) *Conduct imputed from one organization to another organization.* We may impute the fraudulent, criminal, or other improper conduct of one organization to another organization when the improper conduct occurred in connection with a partnership, joint venture, joint application, association or similar arrangement, or when the organization to whom the improper conduct is imputed has the power to direct, manage, control or influence the activities of the organization responsible for the improper conduct. Acceptance of the benefits derived from the conduct is evidence of knowledge, approval or acquiescence.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Thomas Williams, Appellant.

[803 NYS2d 482]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Mario J. Rossetti, A.J.), rendered May 19, 2003. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted rape in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed *(see People v Hidalgo,*91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]). Present—Green, J.P., Scudder, Kehoe, Martoche and Hayes, JJ.
IA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 77

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States with

respect to the terms of Senators and Representatives.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 8, 1995

Mr. MCCOLLUM (for himself, Mr. HOKE, Mr. WAMP, and Mr. FOLEY) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States with respect to the terms of Senators and Representatives.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission

9 for ratification:
2

•HJ 77 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE—

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. The term of office of a Representative

3 in Congress shall be four years and shall coincide with

4 the term of the President of the United States.

5 ‘‘SECTION 2. No person who has been elected for a

6 full term to the Senate two times shall be eligible for elec7 tion or appointment to the Senate. No person who has

8 been elected for a full term to the House of Representa9 tives three times shall be eligible for election to the House

10 of Representatives.

11 ‘‘SECTION 3. No person who has served as a Senator

12 for more than three years of a term shall subsequently

13 be eligible for election to the Senate more than once. No

14 person who has served as a Representative for more than

15 two years shall subsequently be eligible for election to the

16 House of Representatives more than two times.

17 ‘‘SECTION 4. No election or service occurring before

18 this article becomes operative shall be taken into account

19 when determining eligibility for election under this article.

20 ‘‘SECTION 5. No Member of one House of Congress

21 may, except in the final year of that Member’s current

22 term, qualify under applicable State law as a candidate

23 for the other House of Congress, unless that Member has

24 resigned from the House in which that Member currently

25 serves.
3

•HJ 77 IH

1 ‘‘SECTION 6. This article shall apply with respect to

2 terms of office of Representatives and Senators beginning

3 after the first day of the year immediately following the

4 first presidential election after ratification of this article.’’.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1253 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1253

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 13, 1995

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To rename the San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge as the Don 
          Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SAN FRANCISCO BAY NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE RENAMED AS DON 
              EDWARDS SAN FRANCISCO BAY NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE.

    (a) Refuge Renamed.--The San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge 
(established by the Act entitled ``An Act to provide for the 
establishment of the San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge'', 
approved June 30, 1972 (86 Stat. 399 et seq.)), is hereby renamed and 
shall be known as ``the Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife 
Refuge''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in any statute, rule, regulation, 
Executive order, publication, map, or paper or other document of the 
United States to the San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge is 
deemed to refer to the Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife 
Refuge.
    (c) Conforming Amendment.--The Act entitled ``An Act to provide for 
the establishment of the San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge'', 
approved June 30, 1972 (86 Stat. 399 et seq.), is amended by striking 
``San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge'' each place it appears 
and inserting ``Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife 
Refuge''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 12, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                              
<ARTICLE>                          5
<LEGEND>                        
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Partnership's  audited  financial  statements  for the quarter ended January 31,
1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>                       
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
                                    
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                       JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                  3,617
<SECURITIES>                            5,937
<RECEIVABLES>                          18,886
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        3,786
<PP&E>                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         29,014
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      69
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                             28,945
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           29,014
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        1,109
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             235
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           874
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       874
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                              874
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            1.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                            1.57
        

</TABLE>