alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 158 (Tuesday, August 18, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 41701]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19743]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. [thinsp]225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than September 2, 2009.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Kenneth Binning, Vice 
President, Applications and Enforcement) 101 Market Street, San 
Francisco, California 94105-1579:
    1. Alan Isaac Rothenberg, Beverly Hills, California; to acquire at 
least 10 percent of the voting shares of 1st Century Bancshares, Inc., 
and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of 1st Century Bank, N.A., 
both of Los Angeles, California.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 13, 
2009.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-19743 Filed 8-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 235.4 Check Forgery Insurance Fund.

The Check Forgery Insurance Fund, established pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3343, shall be available for use by the Commissioner, Bureau of the Fiscal Service, and accountable officers of the United States for the purpose of providing funding for settlements made to a payee or special indorsee pursuant to these regulations.

[40 FR 6785, Feb. 14, 1975, as amended at 49 FR 47001, 47002, Nov. 30, 1984]
#### § 25.403 Registration.

The Guaranty shall cease to be effective with respect to the Private Loan or any Private Loan Portion or any Derivative to the extent that the Private Loan or the respective Private Loan Portion or the respective Derivative, as the case may be, is used to provide significant support for a Non-Registered Obligation.
§ 49.4254-1 Computation of tax. ( a ) *General rule.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, when a bill is rendered to the taxpayer covering charges for general telephone service, toll telephone service, or telegraph service, with respect to which a tax is imposed by section 4251, the amount upon which the tax with respect to such services shall be based shall be the sum of all such charges for such services included in the bill.
( b ) *Special rule in certain cases.* When a bill is rendered to the taxpayer covering charges for general telephone service, toll telephone service, or telegraph service, with respect to which a tax is imposed by section 4251, by a person who groups individual items for purposes of rendering the bill and computing the tax, then the amount on which the tax with respect to each such group shall be based shall be the sum of all items within that group, and the tax on remaining items not included in any such group shall be based on the charge for each item separately.
#### § 48.4091-3 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Protein Polymer
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and





(2)
            The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the
Company.







/s/ JAMES
B. MCCCARTHY


James B.
McCarthy


Interim
Principal Financial Officer


May 20,
2009
enterologic_ex1023.htm


EXHIBIT 10.23


 


This letter Agreement is dated as of July 31, 2012 and is entered into between Enterologics, Inc., a Nevada corporation with an address at 1264 University Avenue West, Suite 404 - St. Paul MN 55104 with an additional address at 20 East Sunrise Hwy, Valley Stream, NY 11581 and Corporate Debt Consultants, LLC with an address of c/o 2071 Flatbush Avenue Suite 166 Brooklyn, NY 11234.


 


WHEREAS


 


Enterologics, Inc seeks to borrow certain funds for its operational needs and;


 


WHEREAS


 


Corporate Debt Consultants, LLC is willing and able  to provide a bridge loan, the total not to exceed Two   Hundred Thousand and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000) and;


 


WHEREAS


 


The parties have agreed to certain terms of the loan(s) as more fully described in the Promissory Loan Agreement of even date


 


THEREFORE


 


For good and valuable consideration, the parties hereby agree as follows: agreement,


 



	
1.  

	
Corporate Debt Consultants, LLC will loan Enterologics, Inc. a total of $250,000 on an as need basis;








	
2.  

	
The first loan is in the amount of $15,000 will be advanced on or before August 2, 2012;








	
3.  

	
A second  loan in the amount of $25,000 may be called for any time after August 15,  2012;








	
4.  

	
A third loan in the amount of 25,000 may be called any time  after August 31, 2012;








	
5.  

	
The fourth loan in the amount of $35,000 may be called for any time after September 15,  2012;








	
6.  

	
The final loan in the amount of $150,000 must be called by September 30, 2012;








	
7.  

	
The commitment for funding under this Letter Agreement will expire on October 1, 2012;








	
8.  

	
Interest and other terms are outlined in each Promissory Note;








	
9.  

	
Each successive loan will be documented by a new Promissory Note;








	
10.  

	
The overall consideration for this first loan and for any successive loans is 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock;








	
11.  

	
It is understood that each loan and the total of all loans, is backed by the Promissory Notes only and are unsecured;








	
12.  

	
The total of the compensation is being given concurrent with the first loan;








	
13.  

	
It is understood and agreed to that the stock portion of the consideration will not increase or decrease based on future loans and that the consideration is for the first loan and for a commitment to fund additional loans when and given necessary.

















Agreed:


 




	 	 	 	 	 
	
/s/ Robert Hoerr 

	 	 	
/s/ Alex Englard

	 
	
Robert Hoerr 

	 	 	
Alex Englard

	 
	
CEO 

	 	 	
Managing Member
§ 19.740 Are suspension proceedings formal? ( a ) Suspension proceedings are conducted in a fair and informal manner. The suspending official may use flexible procedures to allow you to present matters in opposition. In so doing, the suspending official is not required to follow formal rules of evidence or procedure in creating an official record upon which the official will base a final suspension decision.
( b ) You as a respondent or your representative must submit any documentary evidence you want the suspending official to consider.
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

March 04, 2011

Mr. William Richard Thompson II

750 N. St. Paul Street, Suite 1800

Dallas, TX 75201

Mr. Greg White

P.O. Box 1470

Waco, TX 76703-1470

Ms. Kimberly S. Keller

234 W. Bandera Road, #120

Boerne, TX 78006

Mr. Eddie Vassallo

3710 Rawlins, Suite 1200

Dallas, TX 75219-6410

Mr. John Aldrich Wright

2711 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1032

Dallas, TX 75234

RE:Case Number:  10-0386

Court of Appeals Number:  05-10-00515-CV

Trial Court Number:  CC-09-01417-B

Style:IN RE  DALLAS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT D/B/A PARKLAND HEALTH & HOSPITAL SYSTEM

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas granted the Agreed Motion to Abate and issued the enclosed abatement order in the above-referenced case.  The case is removed from the Court’s active docket until **March 9, 2011**, by which the parties must file either a status report or motion to dismiss.

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosure

**Case No. 10-0386Page 2**
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Timothy Michael BAKER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-6434.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 13, 2002.

Decided June 19, 2002.

*662Timothy Michael Baker, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard, Office of the United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Timothy Michael Baker seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the order denying his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001) motion and for a certificate of appealability.* We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *See United States v. Baker,*Nos. CR-96-820; CA-99-4093-6-13AK (D.S.C. filed Jan. 9, 2002; entered Jan. 10, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*

*

 Baker's appeal is limited to the January 10, 2002, order denying his motion for reconsideration and for a certificate of appealability. Baker’s motion for reconsideration was not the functional equivalent of a notice of appeal from the July 30, 2001, order and judgment denying his § 2255 motion.
Page 1 of 1 

Updated PM Results PPL Montana 

Parker, James M 

to: 

Vanessa Hinkle 

02/29/2012 11 :27 AM 

Cc: 

Aaron Worstell 

Hide Details 

From: "Parker, James M" <jmparker@pplweb.com> 

To: Vanessa Hinkle/R8/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: Aaron WorsteIIlR8/USEPA/US@EPA 

I Attachment 

PM Summary.xls 

Hi Vanessa - here is an updated spreadsheet of particulate matter results from our coal fired plants. 

As you can see, the condensable fraction appears to have some variability. This variability has surprised us, but since 

we've only recently started measuring the condensable fraction, we're not sure what to make of this variability ­

whether it is an artifact of the new method being used or true variability in the condensable fraction. At this point, we 

know of nothing to indicate these results are in error. 

I will be out of the office this Friday, through Monday, March 12. If you should have any questions about this or other 

items, please contact Reid Clemmer (61 0-774-5475) or Gordon Criswell (406-237-6952) 

Thanks 

Jim 

The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the 

recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible 

for del ivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in 

error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying ofthis message is strictly prohibited. If you 

have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the original message. 

file://C:\Documents and Settings\vhinkle\Local Settings\Temp\notes7A42A6\~web9330.htm 3/6/2012 
PPL Montana 

Summary of EPA Method 202 Particulate Stack Test Results 

Novemser, 2011 

Revised Februray, 2012 

Filterable Condensable 

Particulate Particulate Total Particulate 

Unit Date (#/MMBtu) (#/MMBtu) (#/MMBtu) Comments 

Avg of 3 runs. Due to the 

proportion of condensable 

particulate and variability between 

runs, results are in question and 

Colstrip 1 Apr-11 0.0155 0.0214 0.0369 will be verified 

Re-test to verify condensible 

Nov-11 0.057 0.014 0.071 fraction 

Avg of 3 runs. Submitted in 

Colstrip 3 Jun-10 0.0226 0.0049 0.0275 response to Utility MACT ICR 

Nov-11 0.021 0.011 0.031 Re-test to verify results 

Corette Apr-11 0.07 0.007 0.077 Avg of 4 runs 

Condensible to 

Total Ratio 

Condensible 

to Filterable 

Ratio 

0.58 1.38 

0.20 0.25 

0.18 

0.35 

0.09 

0.22 

0.52 

0.10
August 13, 2012


 


Via E-Mail


 


Elkhorn Goldfields Inc.


1610 Wynkoop Street


Suite 400


Denver, CO


80202


 


Attention:Robert Trenaman


 


Dear Sirs:


 


Purchase of Gold Stream from Elkhorn
Goldfields LLC (“Elkhorn”)


 


Further to our recent
discussions and at your request, this binding letter of intent sets forth the general terms and conditions pursuant to which it
is proposed that Black Diamond Financial Group LLC (“BDFG”), as the Manager of Black Diamond Holdings LLC, (“BDH”)
has proposed to expand the existing Mineral Purchase Contract between Elkhorn and BDH.


 


Based upon the success
of marketing the revised Mineral Purchase Agreement, the number of ounces purchased under the contract will be increased by an
additional 38,000 ozs to 71,000 ozs of payable gold (the “BDFG Payable Gold”). The upfront for this purchase
shall be increased up to $12,500,000 which shall be advanced in several tranches as per a schedule to be agreed on between BDFG,
BDH, and Elkhorn. The BDFG Payable Gold under the Mineral Purchase Agreement will be reduced from 80% to 50%. After the Golden
Dream has produced 142,000 ozs resulting in the fulfillment of 71,000 ozs of delivered as per the contract, there will be no BDFG
Payable Gold until such time as the Golden Dream has produced a total of 250,000 ounces. After the Golden Dream Mine has produced
250,000 ounces, BDFG will be entitled to 15% of gold produced over the remaining life of the Golden Dream Mine.


 


The existing Mineral
Purchase Agreement will be amended to serve as a Master Mineral Purchase Agreement to allow for Sub-Mineral Purchase Contracts.


 


BDFG will be responsible
as the Manager of BDH for the construction, finalization and funding of the agreement contemplated hereunder. Under the Advisory
Agreement between BDFG and Elkhorn, BDFG will be paid a fee of up to $1,140,000, and will be responsible for all expenses relative
to the expanded contract.


 


 


 





1610 Wynkoop
Street, Suite 400, Denver, CO 80202


Phone 303
893 2334


Fax 303.957.5536
׀ www.bdfin.com 



    	 



    	 



    



 


 


 


If you are in agreement
with the terms set forth, please sign below. It is acknowledged that this Letter of Intent shall be subject to Board Approval of
Elkhorn Goldfields Inc. and Eastern Resources Inc. and the Board of BDFG, and BDH.


 


Sincerely,


 


BLACK DIAMOND FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC


 


 


 


By:                                                            


Name:Patrick W.M. Imeson


Title:Managing Director/Principal


 


 


ACCEPTED AND AGREED


as of this day of August, 2012.


 


 


ELKHORN GOLDFIELDS INC.


 


 


 


By:                                                           


Name:Robert Trenaman


Title:President


 


 


 


 





1610 Wynkoop
Street, Suite 400, Denver, CO 80202


Phone 303
893 2334


Fax 303.957.5536
׀ www.bdfin.com
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 340.9 Bids—revocations—rejections—postponements—reoffers.

The Secretary of the Treasury, in his discretion, may (a) revoke the public notice of invitation to bid at any time before opening bids, (b) return all bids unopened either at or prior to the time specified for their opening, (c) reject any or all bids, (d) postpone the time for presentation and opening of bids, and (e) waive any immaterial or obvious defect in any bid. Any action the Secretary of the Treasury may take in these respects shall be final. In the event of a postponement, known bidders will be advised thereof and their bids returned unopened.
www.gpo.gov

### §288k. Extension of certain privileges, exemptions, and immunities to Hong Kong Economic and Trade Offices

#### (a) Application of International Organizations Immunities Act

The provisions of the International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288 et seq.) may be extended to the Hong Kong Economic and Trade Offices in the same manner, to the same extent, and subject to the same conditions as such provisions may be extended to a public international organization in which the United States participates pursuant to any treaty or under the authority of any Act of Congress authorizing such participation or making an appropriation for such participation.

#### (b) Application of international agreement on certain State and local taxation

The President is authorized to apply the provisions of Article I of the Agreement on State and Local Taxation of Foreign Employees of Public International Organizations, done at Washington on April 21, 1994, to the Hong Kong Economic and Trade Offices.

#### (c) “Hong Kong Economic and Trade Offices” defined

The term “Hong Kong Economic and Trade Offices” refers to Hong Kong's official economic and trade missions in the United States.

(Pub. L. 105–22, §1, June 27, 1997, 111 Stat. 236.)

#### References in Text

The International Organizations Immunities Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is title I of act Dec. 29, 1945, ch. 652, 59 Stat. 669, as amended, which is classified principally to this subchapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 288 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the International Organizations Immunities Act which comprises this subchapter.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 306.16 Exchanges of registered securities. No assignments will be required for: ( a ) Authorized denominational exchanges of registered securities for like securities in the same names and forms of registration and
( b ) Redemption-exchanges, or prefundings, or advance refundings in the same names and forms as appear in the registration or assignments of the securities surrendered.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Ambassador-at-Large for Global Women’s Issues Rao Gupta Travels to Iceland

# 											Ambassador-at-Large for Global Women’s Issues Rao Gupta Travels to Iceland									

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

November 13, 2023

U.S. Ambassador-at-Large for Global Women’s Issues Dr. Geeta Rao Gupta will travel to Reykjavik, Iceland from November 13 to 15.  On November 14, Ambassador-at-Large Rao Gupta will speak at the Reykjavik Global Forum-Women Leaders, a conference co-hosted by the Government of Iceland and the Parliament of Iceland, in partnership with Women Political Leaders, a global network of women politicians.  At this Forum, Ambassador Rao Gupta will engage with women leaders from diverse sectors to exchange best practices on the advancement of gender equality and women’s meaningful political participation and leadership.  While in Reykjavik, the Ambassador will also meet with ambassadors and counterparts from various countries.

For media inquiries, please contact stategwi@state.gov.

Tags

Bureau of European and Eurasian AffairsGenderGlobal Women's IssuesIcelandOffice of Global Women’s IssuesOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial International TravelWomen's IssuesWomen's RightsWomen’s Economic Empowerment

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Birch Branch, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Earnest Mathis,
Jr., Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date:    February 14, 2008
                                           /s/ Earnest Mathis, Jr.
                                           ------------------------
                                              Earnest Mathis, Jr.
                                     Chief Executive Officer and Director


<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Protein Polymer Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
        Company.



/s/ J. Thomas Parmeter
----------------------
J. Thomas Parmeter
President and Chief Executive Officer
May 14, 2004



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Protein Polymer Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
        Company.



/s/ Janis Y. Neves
------------------
Janis Y. Neves
Director of Finance and Assistant Secretary
May 14, 2004