alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 3.4**

TEXAS EASTERNPRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC

Consent of SoleMember

March 22,2005

Theundersigned, EPE Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Company”),constituting the general partner of Enterprise GP Holdings L.P., a Delawarelimited partnership (“Enterprise Holdings”), does hereby approve of thefollowing recitals and resolutions in its capacity as general partner ofEnterprise Holdings:

WHEREAS,pursuant to Section 9(g)(ii) of the TEPPCO GP LLC Agreement, anymember of the TEPPCO Board who is not an employee or affiliate of TEPPCO GPshall retire at the first meeting of the TEPPCO Board following attainment ofthe age of 70 years; and

WHEREAS,the Company, in its capacity as general partner of Enterprise Holdings, has determinedthat it is advisable and in the best interest of TEPPCO GP and TEPPCO LP toamend the TEPPCO GP LLC Agreement to delete Section 9(g)(ii) in itsentirety.

**Amendmentto TEPPCO GP LLC Agreement**

RESOLVED,that the TEPPCO GP LLC Agreement is hereby amended by deleting Section 9(g)(ii) inits entirety;

**Miscellaneous**

RESOLVED,that all lawful actions heretofore taken by the Company, in its capacity asgeneral partner of Enterprise Holdings, related to or in connection with thetransactions contemplated by these resolutions, including, without limitation,the execution and delivery of any agreements, instruments or other documents asthe Company deemed necessary, proper or advisable, are hereby adopted,ratified, confirmed and approved in all respects; and

RESOLVED,that the Company, in its capacity as general partner of Enterprise Holdings, beand is, authorized and directed to take any and all such further action, toprepare, amend, execute and deliver all such further agreements, instrumentsand documents, for and in the name and on behalf of the Company, in itscapacity as general partner of Enterprise Holdings, and to pay all suchexpenses as in its discretion may be necessary, proper or advisable to carryinto effect the purposes and intentions of this and each of the foregoingresolutions.

----

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this written consent effective asof the date first above written.
|        | ENTERPRISE GP HOLDINGS L.P.                                     |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (Sole Member of Texas Eastern Products Pipeline   Company, LLC) |
|   |                                                            |   |   |
|   | By:                                                             | EPE Holdings, LLC, its general partner |   |
|   |                                                            |   |   |
|   | By:                                                             | /s/ RICHARD H. BACHMANN |   |
|   |                                                            | Richard H. Bachmann |   |
|   |                                                            | Executive Vice President |   |

 

2

----
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 15

- 00399

- CR

Jeff P. Wright

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From Criminal District Court No. 1

o f Tarrant County (1405168D )

November 3, 2016

Opinion by Justice Meier

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment s . It is ordered that the judgment s

of the trial court are affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bill Meier

Justice Bill Meier
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       3,695,978
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,949,587
<ALLOWANCES>                                    43,369
<INVENTORY>                                  5,511,280
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,083,333
<PP&E>                                       5,770,670
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,152,565
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,503,733
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,500,876
<BONDS>                                        453,859
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       180,309
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,368,689
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,503,733
<SALES>                                      6,695,465
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,695,465
<CGS>                                        5,032,576
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,032,576
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,231,237
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              40,651
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (593,405)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (593,405)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (593,405)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 1.8 Scope.

The regulations in this subpart concern access to information and records other than under 5 U.S.C. 552. This subpart is applicable to the Departmental Offices and to the bureaus of the Department as defined in § 1.1(a) of this part, except to the extent that bureaus of the Department have adopted separate guidance governing the subject matter of a provision of this subpart.

[69 FR 54003, Sept. 7, 2004]
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 321.25 Payment and retention of definitive securities.

The definitive security must be presented and surrendered to the paying agent in order to receive payment. An agent is prohibited from accepting an image, or other copy or reproduction of the definitive security, for redemption or processing. To ensure that all transactions processed by agents are properly validated, agents must establish and comply with a retention period for definitive securities that are truncated and converted to an electronic image. At a minimum, the agent must retain such securities for a period of thirty calendar days following the date that the agent submitted the electronic image of the paid security to a Federal Reserve Processing Site. Agents may establish longer retention periods for definitive securities at their discretion.

[77 FR 16167, Mar. 20, 2012]
#### § 31.3112-1 Instrumentalities of the United States specifically exempted from the employer tax.

Section 3112 makes ineffectual as to the employer tax imposed by section 3111 those provisions of law which grant to an instrumentality of the United States an exemption from taxation, unless such provisions grant a specific exemption from the tax imposed by section 3111 by an express reference to such section or the corresponding section of prior law (section 1410 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939). Thus, the general exemptions from Federal taxation granted by various statutes to certain instrumentalities of the United States without specific reference to the tax imposed by section 3111 or by section 1410 of the 1939 Code are rendered inoperative insofar as such exemptions relate to the tax imposed by section 3111. For provisions relating to the exception from employment of services performed in the employ of an instrumentality of the United States specifically exempted from the employer tax, see § 31.3121(b)(5)-1. For provisions relating to services performed for an instrumentality exempt on December 31, 1950, from the employer tax, see paragraph (c) of § 31.3121 (b) (6)-1.
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Assistant Secretary Noyes’ Travel to New York

# 									Assistant Secretary Noyes’ Travel to New York							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

May 17, 2022

Assistant Secretary of State for Population, Refugees, and Migration Julieta Valls Noyes will travel to New York, New York, May 18-20, where she will attend the International Migration Review Forum (IMRF) to discuss international cooperation on migration and meet with UN and government officials.

This inaugural meeting is the first quadrennial IMRF since UN Member States endorsed the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration (GCM) in December 2018. The IMRF will consist of four interactive multi-stakeholder roundtable discussions and policy debates, and a General Debate (plenary). The GCM outlines 23 objectives covering all aspects of migration and is based on a collective realization that no single government can effectively govern migration alone.

For additional information on the GCM, visit https://www.state.gov/global-compact-for-safe-orderly-and-regular-migration-gcm/. The IMRF will be broadcast live on UN WebTV at https://media.un.org/en/webtv 

Tags

Bureau of Population, Refugees, and MigrationMigrationNew YorkOffice of the SpokespersonOfficial Domestic Travel

Back to Top
1

Pallarino, Bob

From: Poentis, Aaron Y CIV NAVFAC HI, EV <aaron.poentis@navy.mil>

Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 10:25 AM

To: Richard Takaba (richard.takaba@doh.hawaii.gov); roxanne.kwan@doh.hawaii.gov

Cc: stuart.yamada@doh.hawaii.gov; steven.chang@doh.hawaii.gov; Linder, Steven; Pallarino, 

Bob; Lovgren, Andrew C LCDR, NAVSUP FLCPH C700; Shimabuku, June T. CIV NAVFAC 

HI, EV4; Tsutsui, Bruce O CIV NAVFAC HI, OPHE3; Kishaba, Raelynn I CIV NAVFAC HI, 

EV4; Mizuno, Arleen M CIV NAVFAC HI, PRJ412

Subject: RED HILL STATUS REPORT - February 10, 2015

Signed By: aaron.poentis@navy.mil

Hi Richard/Roxanne: 

Attached are the updated information for the weekly progress report from Navy Region Hawaii, and the Fleet Logistic 

Center Pearl Harbor for the week of February 3, 2015. In a process to ease reading, only sections with changes will be 

annotated. 

1. Preliminary Work Plan 

Action complete. 

2. Release Response Action Items (initiate immediately, complete as soon as practicable) 

a. Action 1 - Provide a schedule for the ventilation of Tank 5 and an estimated date to commence the investigation 

of release point(s) within Tank 5. 

Action complete. 

b. Action 2 - The rate of vertical migration for the released JP-8 free product is unknown. Information from the 

previously collected basalt cores could be used for initial modeling of vertical migration. This information is necessary to 

protect drinking water resources from petroleum contamination. Prepare models for petroleum JP-8 releases of 10,000, 

20,000 and 30,000 gallons from points at 25% intervals from the bottom to the top of Tank 5. 

No change. 

c. Action 3 - Removal of petroleum free product from the area outside the tank will reduce downward migration of 

the released JP-8 free product. Characterization of the free product plume and recovery of free product with increased 

monitoring are required to address this plume. 

No change. 

d. Action 4 - Additional studies and procedures are required to address the potential and impact of any future 

releases from the USTs within the Complex. This will require new financial and personnel resources to complete. 

Funding for the preliminary work plan and all necessary following work is critical. 

d.(1) Groundwater Monitoring Wells 

No change. 

d.(2) Site Characterization 
2

No change. 

d.(3) AOC/SOW 

Discussions are ongoing. 

d.(4) Request for Additional Information 

No change. 

d.(5) BWS/USGS Groundwater Flow Study 

No change. 

Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions. 

v/r, 

Aaron
#### In the Matter of Richard I. Romanoff, Appellant, v Raymond Kelly, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, Respondent.

[806 NYS2d 6]

Judgment (denominated an order), Supreme Court, New York County (Paviola A. Soto, J.), rendered April 20, 2004, which dismissed the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 challenging the revocation of petitioner’s license to carry a handgun, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We agree with petitioner that one of respondent’s bases for the revocation of his pistol permit was incorrect. Penal Law § 400.00 (1) (e) applies only in conjunction with the application of the Criminal Procedure Law and Family Court Act sections cited therein, which deal with orders of protection, and provides that a person who has previously had a firearms license revoked pursuant to those sections is ineligible to hold such a license. Since petitioner’s Westchester County pistol permit revocation had nothing to do with an order of protection, it could not, in and of itself, render him ineligible to continue to hold a firearms license.

Nevertheless, respondent’s additional finding that petitioner lacks the requisite character to possess firearms under Penal Law § 400.00 (1) (b) is supported by evidence that petitioner failed to inform licensing authorities regarding his license revocation in another jurisdiction and is a sufficient basis, in and of itself, for revocation *(see Matter of Perlov,*21 AD3d 270 [2005]).

We reject petitioner’s claim that the penalty imposed is disproportionate to his infractions or shocking to the conscience. We note, in particular, that the Westchester revocation *(Matter of Romanoff v Lange,*281 AD2d 551 [2001]) was, itself, based on dishonest acts by petitioner. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Tom, Andrias, Sullivan and Malone, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. FDA-2009-N-0336]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Food and Drug Administration is correcting a notice entitled that appeared in the                         **Federal Register**                         of August 3, 2009 (74 FR 38429). The document announced the Fiscal Year 2010 fee rates for the Animal Drug User Fee Act. The document was published with a typographical error. This document corrects that error.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

David Miller, Office of Financial Management (HFA-100), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-3917.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In FR Doc. E9-18459, appearing on page 38429 in the                     **Federal Register**                     of Monday, August 3, 2009, the following correction is made:                

                    1. On page 38429, in the third column, in the first sentence of the last paragraph under                     **Background**                    , “$209,400” is corrected to read “$290,400”.                

Dated: August 12, 2009.

Jeffrey Shuren,

Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.

[FR Doc. E9-19779 Filed 8-17-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
124 STAT. 4054 PUBLIC LAW 111–362—JAN. 4, 2011 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5606: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010): 

Sept. 28, 29, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 16, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–362 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 47 South 

7th Street in Indiana, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘James M. ‘Jimmy’ Stewart Post 

Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. JAMES M. ‘‘JIMMY’’ STEWART POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 47 South 7th Street in Indiana, Pennsylvania, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘James M. ‘Jimmy’ Stewart 

Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘James M. ‘Jimmy’ Stewart Post Office Building’’. 

Approved January 4, 2011. 

Jan. 4, 2011 

[H.R. 5606] 


dkrause on GSDDPC29PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 354.7 Withdrawal of eligible Book-entry Sallie Mae Securities for conversion to definitive form. ( a ) Eligible Book-entry Sallie Mae Securities may be withdrawn from the Book-entry System by requesting delivery of like Definitive Sallie Mae Securities.
( b ) A Federal Reserve Bank shall, upon receipt of appropriate instructions to withdraw Eligible Book-entry Sallie Mae Securities from book-entry in the Book-entry System, convert such securities into Definitive Sallie Mae Securities and deliver them in accordance with such instructions. No such conversion shall affect existing interests in such Sallie Mae Securities.
( c ) All requests for withdrawal of Eligible Book-entry Sallie Mae Securities must be made prior to the maturity or date of call of such securities.
( d ) Sallie Mae Securities which are to be delivered upon withdrawal may be issued in either registered or bearer form, to the extent permitted by the applicable Securities Documentation.
Exhibit 10.1




Promissory Note
On this date of
July 17, 2012, in return for valuable consideration received, the undersigned borrower jointly and severally promise to pay to John W. Roblin, the
"Lender", the sum of $400,000.00, together with interest thereon at the rate of 9% per annum.


Terms of Repayment: This loan shall be repaid under the following terms: the earlier
 the borrower receives the payment from Old Republic of $896,000 due October 31, 2012 or sooner.  All payments shall be first applied to interest and
the balance to principal.


Borrower's Address - The Borrower shall provide to provide prompt written notice to the
Lender of any change of address. 


Prepayment - This Note may be prepaid in whole or in part at any time without premium or
penalty. All prepayments shall first be applied to interest, and then to principal payments in the order of their maturity.



Default - In the event of default, the
borrower agrees to pay all costs and expenses incurred by the Lender, including all reasonable attorney fees (including both hourly and contingent attorney fees
as permitted by law) for the collection of this Note upon default, and including reasonable collection charges (including, where consistent with industry
practices, a collection charge set as a percentage of the outstanding balance of this Note) should collection be referred to a collection agency.



Modification - No modification or waiver of
any of the terms of this Agreement shall be allowed unless by written agreement signed by both parties. No waiver of any breach or default hereunder shall be
deemed a waiver of any subsequent breach or default of the same or similar nature.


Transfer of the Note - The borrowers hereby waive any notice of the transfer of this Note by
the Lender or by any subsequent holder of this Note, agree to remain bound by the terms of this Note subsequent to any transfer, and agree that the terms of
this Note may be fully enforced by any subsequent holder of this Note.


Severability of Provisions - In the event that any portion of this Note is deemed
unenforceable, all other provisions of this Note shall remain in full force and effect.


Choice of Law - All terms and conditions of this Note shall be interpreted under the laws of
the State of New Jersey.



Signed Under Penalty of Perjury, this 17 day of July, 2012,

_______________________________________

Ann F. Massey

Chief Financial
Officer

Cover-All
Technologies Inc.
99–008 

112TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 112–14 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE SENATE AMENDMENT TO THE 

BILL (H.R. 514) TO EXTEND EXPIRING PROVISIONS OF THE USA PATRIOT 

IMPROVEMENT AND REAUTHORIZATION ACT OF 2005 AND INTELLIGENCE REFORM AND TERRORISM PREVENTION ACT OF 2004 RELATING TO ACCESS TO BUSINESS RECORDS, INDIVIDUAL TERRORISTS AS 

AGENTS OF FOREIGN POWERS, AND ROVING WIRETAPS UNTIL DECEMBER 8, 2011 

FEBRUARY 15, 2011.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. DREIER, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 93] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 93, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of the Senate 

amendment to H.R. 514, to extend expiring provisions of the USA 

PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 and Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 relating to 

access to business records, individual terrorists as agents of foreign 

powers, and roving wiretaps until December 8, 2011. The resolution makes in order a motion offered by the chair of the Committee 

on the Judiciary that the House concur in the Senate amendment 

to H.R. 514. The resolution waives all points of order against consideration of the motion. The resolution provides that the Senate 

amendment and the motion shall be considered as read. The resolution provides for one hour of debate on the motion with 40 minutes equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary and 20 minutes 

equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority 

member of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

Although the rule waives all points of order against consideration 

of the motion, the Committee is not aware of any points of order 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with HEARING
2 

against consideration of the motion. The waiver of all points of 

order against consideration of the motion is prophylactic. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with HEARING
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

 Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 

January 5, 2017

t1212

Order 

Clerk

January 5, 2017

154169

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 154169

COA: 325895 

Wayne CC: 14-006314-FH

MARCUS HIGHTOWER, a/k/a MARCUS

ORLANDO HIGHTOWER, a/k/a MARCUS

OLANDO HIGHTOWER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 21, 2016 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.