alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex10-1.htm







Exhibit 10.1


 


 



EXHIBIT A












FIRST AMENDMENT


TO


GLYECO, INC.







2012 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN


 


This First Amendment (the “Amendment”) to the GlyEco, Inc., 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is adopted as of the 13th day of July, 2012.


 


 


1.           Section 4.1 of the Plan is hereby amended to increase the number of shares reserved for issuance under the Plan from Three Million Five Hundred Thousand (3,500,000) shares to Six Million Five Hundred Thousand (6,500,000) shares.


 


 


2.           Except as set forth in this Amendment, all terms and conditions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.


 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, GlyEco, Inc. hereby adopts this Amendment as of the date hereof.


 


GLYECO, INC., a Nevada corporation













	 	
By: /s/ John Lorenz

	 
	 	
John Lorenz

	 
	 	
President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000857571
<NAME> AEP GENERATING COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      362,518
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          6
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          39,191
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         1,564
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                   6,044
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 409,323
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       36,235
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                              2,422
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  39,657
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            44,790
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               8,175
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                        972
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                   430
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 315,299
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  409,323
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      167,596
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             2,458
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     158,679 
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     161,137
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          6,459
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               2,457
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   8,916
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         2,494
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,422
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    6,422
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         6,528
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          40,583
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1> All common stock owned by parent company; no EPS required.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 165

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the

fiscal year 1996, and for other purposes.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 165

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

1996, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Public Law 104–99 is further amended by striking

4 out ‘‘March 22, 1996’’ in sections 106(c), 112, 126(c),

5 202(c) and 214 and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘March 29,
2

•HJ 165 EH

1 1996’’, and that Public Law 104–92 is further amended

2 by striking out ‘‘March 22, 1996’’ in section 106(c) and

3 inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘April 3, 1996’’.

Passed the House of Representatives March 21,

1996.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 32

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 (the Form 10-Q), of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 5, 2015



| |  |  |  |     |  |                                      
| |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
| |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Jochen E. Tilk                   
| |  |  |  |     |  | Jochen E. Tilk                       
| |  |  |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 5, 2015



| |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                
| |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
| |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Wayne R. Brownlee                                          
| |  |  |  |     |  | Wayne R. Brownlee                                              
| |  |  |  |     |  | Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K,
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2016, byand among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS LLC, asSpecial Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as CertificateAdministrator, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee  andTRIMONT REAL ESTATE ADVISORS, LLC, as Operating Advisor and as AssetRepresentations Reviewer with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through CertificatesSeries 2016-C37 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein nototherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.            A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period fromDecember 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and 

 

2.            To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

  

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day ofFebruary 2017.

 

 

/s/Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President                       

Wells Fargo Bank 

 

  

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 223.6 [Reserved]
### SERVED: 

## JUNE 11, 

### 2012

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF PLATINUM AIR SERVICE, INC. FAA DOCKETNo. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Case) FDMS FAA-2012-0025
ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

# , c

0

## .\RTMENT OF**.~.-·.** r.**'~"'P''R-·A-1"'**

### 'J ,**--~··,:·!\::,** V. 

### I ,I.LW. 

## ·-_,- ET OPERATIONS ?3!

### Z.!Uil I2 P I: 48

On January 20, 2012, the Federal Aviation Administration ("Complainant") filed a Complaint. On January 9, 2012, Platinum Air Service, Inc. ("Respondent") had filed a Request for Hearing. OnJune 4, 2012, the partiesjointly sent a facsimile letter stating that the matter had settled. Complainant has withdrawn its Complaint and has moved for termination of the proceedings. ...._**~** 14 C.P.R.§ 13.215 states: "At any time before or during a hearing, an agency attorney may withdraw a complaint or party may withdraw a request for a hearing without the consent ofthe administrative lawjudge. Ifan agency attorney withdraws the complaint or a party withdraws the request for a hearing and the answer, the administrative lawjudge shall dismiss the proceedings under this subpart with prejudice." WHEREFORE, the within filed Withdrawal ofComplaint having been read and considered, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Complainant's Withdrawal ofComplaint and Motion to Terminate Proceeding be and is hereby grarited; and2 2. This proceeding be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

# ~~-bJ**C,~lfJ,** Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge ' Attachment

- Service List.r 

# .

SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 ONE COPY Arthur Wasserman, Respondent's Counsel Law Office ofArthur Wasserman 16380 Roscoe Boulevard, Suite 120 Van Nuys, CA 91406-1221 TEL: 818-895-8234 FAJ(: 818-895-0675 Nicholas R. Milliard, Complainant's Counsel Attorney, Enforcement Division, AGC-300 Office ofthe ChiefCounsel Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W
.

. Washington, DC 20591

TEL: 202-267-3452 FAJ(: 202-267-5106 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (£11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAJ(: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2012-0025 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service inperson orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
June 15, 2015

Mr. Marc Ellis 

12911 50th Court East 

Parrish, FL 34219 

Dear Mr. Ellis : 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your June 4, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

2094), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does 

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
# THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 349TH DISTRIC T COURT OF HOUSTON C OUNTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 2 7th
day of February, 2015 , the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

ZELDA ROBINSON LEWIS , Appellant

NO. 12

- 15

- 00030

- CR; Trial Court No. 14CR157

By per curiam opinion.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order i n t hese words:

“ THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this court is without jurisdiction of the appeal, and that the appeal should be dismissed. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJ UDGED and DECREED by this court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction ; and that this decision be certified to

the court below for observance. ”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appe als for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN , Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District , with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Tyler, this the 4 th day of Ma y, 2015.

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By:

_______________________________ Chief Deputy Clerk
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Winton Financial Corporation (the
"Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this Certification (the
"Report"), I, Jill M. Burke, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                                 /s/Jill M. Burke
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Jill M. Burke
                                                 Chief Financial Officer

                                                 Date: May 14, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Winton Financial Corporation and will be retained by Winton
Financial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 61 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 61

    Naming the CVN-76 aircraft carrier as the U.S.S. Ronald Reagan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 23, 1995

   Mr. Dornan (for himself, Mr. Burton of Indiana, and Mr. Callahan) 
 introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on National Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Naming the CVN-76 aircraft carrier as the U.S.S. Ronald Reagan.

Whereas President Ronald Reagan served his country with honor and distinction as 
        the 40th President of the United States;
Whereas President Reagan initiated defense policies that restored the military 
        power and prestige of the United States;
Whereas President Reagan's policy of peace through strength, invigorated by an 
        increase and strengthening of the Armed Forces of the United States 
        under his leadership, led to the demise of Soviet bloc communism and the 
        expansion of democracy around the world;
Whereas President Reagan made a lifelong commitment to rallying the free world 
        to support men and women elsewhere around the world who are struggling 
        to obtain freedom and democracy;
Whereas President Reagan in every way honored the men and women who have 
        volunteered to wear the uniforms of the Armed Forces of the United 
        States;
Whereas President Reagan kept faith with the men and women veterans of service 
        in the Armed Forces of the United States;
Whereas President Reagan served as Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces of the 
        United States with unmatched dignity, style, and grace;
Whereas President Reagan supported a strong Navy and a global United States 
        military presence; and
Whereas President Reagan paid homage to, and symbolized, the American Dream: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the CVN-76, a nuclear 
powered aircraft carrier of the Navy, shall be named the U.S.S. Ronald 
Reagan.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered March 2, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 20
- 00025
- CV SHANNON RICE, Appellant

V. PATRICIA WOOD, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law N o. 4

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 19
- 03744
- D

O RDER The clerk’s record in this case is overdue. By postcard dated January 10,
20 20 , we notified th e Dallas County Clerk that the clerk’s record was overdue. We
directed the County Clerk to file the record within thirty days. To date, the County Clerk has not filed the clerk’s record nor otherwise responded to our notice. Accordingly, we ORDER the County District Clerk to file, within TEN DAYS of the date of this order, either (1) the cl erk’s record, or (2) written verification that appellant is not entitled to proceed without payment of costs andhas not paid for or made arrange ments to pay for the record. We notify appellant

that if we receive verification she is not entitled to proc ee d without payment of costs and has not paid for or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record, we will, without further notice, dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b).
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to:

John Warren Dallas C ounty Clerk All parties /s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Sinclair, Appellant.

[806 NYS2d 609]

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Firetog, J.), dated August 6, 2003, which, after a hearing pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.

Ordered that the order is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the hearing court should not have considered his 1984 violent felony conviction in determining his risk assessment is unpreserved for appellate review *(see People v Cureton,*299 AD2d 532 [2002]) and, in any event, without merit *(see People v Victor R.,*186 Misc 2d 28, 35-36 [2000]). Moreover, the prosecution presented clear and convincing evidence to support a risk level three classification, including the risk assessment instrument and case summary prepared by the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders *(see People v Burgess,*6 AD3d 686 [2004]; *People v Moore,*1 AD3d 421 [2003]).

We note that the defendant’s risk assessment instrument pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act *(see*Correction Law article 6-C [hereinafter SORA]) failed to reflect a 10-point reduction granted by the Supreme Court at the SORA hearing to take into account the defendant’s acceptance of responsibility for his acts. However, the defendant’s score, as corrected, remains within the range of a level three sex offender.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Schmidt, J.P., Cozier, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. FDA-2008-N-0657]

# AGENCY:

 Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

 Notice.

# SUMMARY:

 The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “Recommendations for Early Food Safety Evaluation of New Non-Pesticidal Proteins Produced by New Plant Varieties Intended for Food Use” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Daniel Gittleson, Office of Information Management (HFA-710), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857,                         *Daniel.Gittleson@fda.hhs.gov*                         301-796-5156.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of April 17, 2009 (74 FR 17868), the agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0583. The approval expires on July 31, 2012. A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at                     *http://www.reginfo.gov/​public/​do/​PRAMain.*

Dated: August 11, 2009.

Jeffrey Shuren,

Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.

[FR Doc. E9-19784 Filed 8-17-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S