alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Searched for **http://www.ncix.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.ncix.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
§ 56.6107-1 Tax return preparer must furnish copy of return and claim for refund to taxpayer and must retain a copy or record. ( a ) *In general.* A person who is a signing tax return preparer of any return or claim for refund of tax under Chapter 41 of subtitle D of the Internal Revenue Code shall furnish a completed copy of the return or claim for refund to the public charity and retain a completed copy or record in the manner stated in § 1.6107-1 of this chapter.
( b ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section is applicable to returns and claims for refund filed after December 31, 2008.
[T.D. 9436, 73 FR 78460, Dec. 22, 2008]
Exhibit 34.2

 

|  |   |  |
|--|--------|--|

 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To CWCapital Asset Management LLC

We have examined management of CWCapital Asset Management LLC ("CWCAM")'s assertion that CWCAM complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC")'s Regulation AB for the commercial mortgage-backed securitization trusts included in the accompanying Management's Assertion on Compliance with Regulation AB Criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019. CWCAM's management is responsible for its assertion. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about CWCAM's compliance with the specified requirements based on our examination.

Management has determined that the criteria set forth in Sections 1122 (d)(1)(iii), (d)(3)(i)(B), (d)(3)(i)(C), (d)(3)(i)(D), (d)(3)(ii), (d)(3)(iii), (d)(3)(iv), (d)(4)(v), (d)(4)(ix), (d)(4)(x), (d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii), (d)(4)(xiii), (d)(4)(xiv), and (d)(4)(xv) are not applicable to the activities performed by CWCAM, as a special servicer, with respect to CWCAM's Platform. The commercial mortgage-backed securities transactions covered by this Platform are those specified in Appendix B in the accompanying Management's Assertion on Compliance with Regulation AB Criteria.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the examination to obtain reasonable assurance about whether management's assertion about compliance with the specified requirements is fairly stated, in all material respects. An examination involves performing procedures to obtain evidence about whether management's assertion is fairly stated, in all material respects. The nature, timing, and extent of the procedures selected depend on our judgment, including an assessment of the risks of material misstatement of management's assertion, whether due to fraud or error. We believe that the evidence we obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Our examination does not provide a legal determination on CWCAM's compliance with the specified requirements.

In our opinion, management's assertion that CWCAM complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. SEC's Regulation AB for the commercial mortgage-backed securitization trusts included in the accompanying Management's Assertion on Compliance with Regulation AB Criteria is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/CohnReznick LLP

Bethesda, Maryland February 25, 2020

(Except for Assertion 3 on the Management’s Assertion on

Compliance with Regulation AB Criteria for which is dated

March 23, 2020)
#### § 1026.410 Recordkeeping.

Refer to § 1010.410 of this chapter.
#### § 20.301 [Reserved]
#### Eugene R. DANIELS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. H. MOORE, Lieutenant; M. Brown, Correctional Officer; A. Smith, Correctional Officer; Scott Johnson, Grievance Clerk, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-6624.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 30, 2002.

Decided June 19, 2002.

Eugene R. Daniels, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Thomas King, Jay Hupfer, Willcox, Buyck *&*Williams, P.A., Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Eugene R. Daniels appeals from the district court’s order dismissing without prej*671udice his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”) requires that a prisoner exhaust administrative remedies before filing a § 1983 action concerning his confinement. 42 U.S.C.A. § 1997e(a) (West Supp.2001). In *Booth v. Churner,*532 U.S. 731, 121 S.Ct. 1819, 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001), the Supreme Court held that the PLRA requires a prisoner to exhaust administrative remedies regarding his excessive force claims, even if the prisoner seeks only money damages and such relief is not available under the administrative process. *Id.*at 741, 121 S.Ct. 1819. More recently, in *Porter v. Nussle,*534 U.S. 516, 122 S.Ct. 983, 152 L.Ed.2d 12 (2002), the Supreme Court held that the PLRA’s exhaustion requirement applies to all inmate suits about prison life, whether they involve general circumstances or particular episodes, and whether they allege excessive force or some other wrong. 534 U.S. at-,122 S.Ct. at 992.

There is evidence in the record that Daniels pursued administrative remedies and it is not clear from the district court’s opinion whether the district court considered this evidence. Therefore, although we express no opinion as to whether Daniels in fact has demonstrated exhaustion of administrative remedies, we vacate the district court’s order dismissing the action without prejudice and remand to enable the district court to make such a determination. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*VACATED AND REMANDED.*
§ 80.37 Treatment of batch pending certification. Immediately after the sample that is to accompany a request for certification of a batch of color additive is taken, the batch shall be: ( a ) Stored in containers of such kind as to prevent change in composition.
( b ) Held under the control of the person requesting certification until certified.
( c ) Marked, by labeling or otherwise, in a manner such that there can be no question as to the identity of the batch and no question that it is not to be used until the requested certificate has been issued.
V

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1177

For the relief of Debra Bargeski.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 8, 1995

Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Debra Bargeski.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PAYMENT OF CLAIM.

4 The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of any

5 money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to

6 Debra Bargeski of Braddock Heights, Maryland, the sum

7 of $29,000 and interest on such sum, calculated at the

8 rate established under section 6621(a)(2) of the Internal

9 Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 6621(a)(2)) and

10 compounded daily, for the period beginning on March 9,

11 1988, and ending on the date on which the payment is

12 made. The payment required by this section shall be in
2

•HR 1177 IH

1 full satisfaction of all claims that Debra Bargeski may

2 have against the United States with respect to the taxable

3 year ending December 31, 1981.

4 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON AGENT AND ATTORNEY FEES.

5 It shall be unlawful for an amount exceeding 10 per6 cent of the payment required by section 1 to be paid to

7 or received by any agent or attorney for any service ren8 dered in connection with the payment. Any person who

9 violates this section shall be guilty of an infraction and

10 shall be subject to a fine in the amount provided in title

11 18, United States Code.

Æ
# L_2020419EN.01001401.xml

| 11.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 419/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 419/14

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2020/2024

of 4 December 2020

on the position to be adopted, on behalf of the European Union, within the EEA Joint Committee concerning an amendment to Annex IV (Energy) to the EEA Agreement

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 194 in conjunction with Article 218(9) thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2894/94 of 28 November 1994 concerning arrangements for implementing the Agreement on the European Economic Area (1), and in particular Article 1(3) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | The Agreement on the European Economic Area (2) (‘the EEA Agreement’) entered into force on 1 January 1994. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The Agreement on the European Economic Area (2) (‘the EEA Agreement’) entered into force on 1 January 1994.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 98 of the EEA Agreement, the EEA Joint Committee may decide to amend Annex IV to the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 98 of the EEA Agreement, the EEA Joint Committee may decide to amend Annex IV to the EEA Agreement.

| (3) | Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/1719 (3) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/1719 (3) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (4) | Annex IV to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Annex IV to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly.

| (5) | The position of the Union within the EEA Joint Committee should therefore be based on the draft decision of the EEA Joint Committee, |
| --- | --- |

(5)

The position of the Union within the EEA Joint Committee should therefore be based on the draft decision of the EEA Joint Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The position to be adopted, on behalf of the Union, within the EEA Joint Committee on the proposed amendment to Annex IV (Energy) to the EEA Agreement, shall be based on the draft decision of the EEA Joint Committee (4).

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 4 December 2020.

For the Council

The President

M. ROTH

---

(1)  
  OJ L 305, 30.11.1994, p. 6.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3.

2

(3)  Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/1719 of 26 September 2016 establishing a guideline on forward capacity allocation (OJ L 259, 27.9.2016, p. 42).

3

(4)  See document ST12938/20 at http://register.consilium.europa.eu

4

---
# • FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION COMPLIANC E WITH E.O . 12866 Section 6(0)(3)(£) of E.o. 12866 requires agencies to identify for thepublic. in a complete, clear, Gnd simple manner, those changes in a regulatOlY action made at rhe suggestion or recolllmendation oflhe Office of information and RegulatOlYAffairs (OIRA). Office of Management and Budget. Place a copy of thisform in the docket and in the project folder. Title of Rul emakin g : Regulato ry Id entification Number : OIRA did not review the rulemaking document.

OIRA reviewed the rulemaking document, but did not suggest or recommend any changes. OIRA reviewed the rulemaking document, and we have documented the changes we made at OIRA's suggestion or 

### recommendation in an attachment to this sheet.

/0- 

# «- zP/o Date Attachment [Attach a list of the changes we have made to the rulemaking document at the suggestion or recommendation ofOIRA
. Use a list rather than a redline/strikeout version of the document.)RI N No. 2120-AJ68 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Overflight Fees FAA Compliance with E.O. 12866, Section 6(a)(3) (E) The FAA made the following change to the NPRM based on OMB ' s suggestion. Paperwork Reduction Act. The FAA noted that the infonnation used to track and bill overflights , including the information collection necessary to implement this proposal, is accessed from fl ight plans filed with the FAA under OMB Collection Control # 2120- 0026. The FAA seeks comment on whether a revis ion to this infonnation collection would be necessary as a result ofthis proposal.
Exhibit
      32.2




ICONIX
      BRAND GROUP, INC.




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF




THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Iconix Brand Group, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 (the "Report"), I, Warren
      Clamen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
        Warren Clamen
 
 Warren
      Clamen


Chief
      Financial Officer




Date:
      August 7, 2007
February 21, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JAIME RICARDO PEREZ, Appellant

NO. 14-11-01102-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### U.S. Customs and Border Protection

# AGENCY:

U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security.

# ACTION:

Notice of accreditation and approval of Intertek USA, Inc., as a commercial gauger and laboratory.

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13, Intertek USA, Inc., 4951A East Adamo Drive, Suite 130, Tampa, FL 33605, has been approved to gauge and accredited to test petroleum and petroleum products, organic chemicals and vegetable oils for customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory analyses and gauger services should request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is accredited or approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific test or gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquires regarding the specific test or gauger service this entity is accredited or approved to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to                         *cbp.labhq@dhs.gov*. Please reference the Web site listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories.                         *http://cbp.gov/​xp/​cgov/​import/​operations_​support/​labs_​scientific_​svcs/​commercial_​gaugers/​*.                    

# DATES:

The accreditation and approval of Intertek USA, Inc., as commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on June 03, 2009. The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for June 2012.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Anthony Malana, Laboratories and Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-1060.

Dated: August 4, 2009.

Ira S. Reese,

Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.

[FR Doc. E9-19385 Filed 8-12-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1129

To amend the National Trails Systems Act to designate the route from

Selma to Montgomery as a National Historic Trail.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 3, 1995

Mr. LEWIS of Georgia (for himself, Mr. HILLIARD, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr.

BALDACCI, Mr. BARRETT of Wisconsin, Mr. BISHOP, Ms. BROWN of

Florida, Mr. BRYANT of Texas, Mr. CLAY, Mrs. CLAYTON, Mr. CLYBURN,

Mrs. COLLINS of Illinois, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. DELLUMS,

Mr. DEFAZIO, Ms. DELAURO, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. FARR, Mr. FATTAH, Mr.

FILNER, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. FRAZER, Mr.

FROST, Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. JACOBS, Ms.

JACKSON-LEE, Mr. JEFFERSON, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of

Texas, Mr. KILDEE, Ms. LOFGREN, Mrs. LOWEY, Mrs. MALONEY, Mr.

MCDERMOTT, Mrs. MEEK of Florida, Mr. MILLER of California, Mr.

OWENS, Mr. PAYNE of New Jersey, Ms. PELOSI, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. RICHARDSON, Mr. RUSH, Mr. SANDERS, Mrs. SCHROEDER, Mr. SCOTT, Mr.

STUPAK, Mr. THOMPSON, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. TUCKER, Mr. UNDERWOOD,

Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. WILLIAMS, Mr. WARD, Mr. WATT of North Carolina, Mr. WYNN, Mr. REYNOLDS, Miss COLLINS of Michigan, Ms.

MCKINNEY, Mr. MFUME, Ms. WATERS, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mr.

STOKES, and Mr. DIXON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

A BILL

To amend the National Trails Systems Act to designate

the route from Selma to Montgomery as a National

Historic Trail.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1129 IH

1 That section 5(a) of the National Trails System Act (16

2 U.S.C. 1244(a)) is amended by adding at the end thereof

3 the following new paragraph:

4 ‘‘( ) The Selma to Montgomery National Historic

5 Trail, consisting of 54 miles of city streets and United

6 States Highway 80 from Brown Chapel to A.M.E. Church

7 in Selma to the State Capitol Building in Montgomery,

8 Alabama, traveled by voting rights advocates during

9 March 1965 to dramatize the need for voting rights legis10 lation, as generally described in the report of the Secretary

11 of the Interior prepared pursuant to subsection (b) of this

12 section entitled ‘Selma to Montgomery’ and dated April

13 1993. Maps depicting the route shall be on file and avail14 able for public inspection in the Office of the National

15 Park Service, Department of the Interior. The trail shall

16 be administered by the Secretary of the Interior. In the

17 administration of the trail, the Secretary shall cooperate

18 with State and local authorities to preserve historic sites,

19 including (but not limited to) the Edmund Pettus Bridge

20 and the Brown Chapel AME Church.’’.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 8 Introduced in House (IH)]

                                     

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 8

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
limit the terms of office for Representatives and Senators in Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

Mrs. Fowler (for herself, Mr. Jones, Mr. Weldon of Florida, Mr. Canady, 
 Mr. Deutsch, Mr. Goss, Mr. Meehan, Mr. Smith of Michigan, Mr. Ganske, 
Ms. Danner, and Mr. Hancock) introduced the following joint resolution; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
limit the terms of office for Representatives and Senators in Congress.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article --

    ``No person may serve more than four consecutive terms as 
Representative or two consecutive terms as Senator, not counting any 
term that began before the adoption of this article of amendment.''.
                                 <all>
```
ACCEPTED

03-13-00403-CR

8261707

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

12/16/2015 11:44:01 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 12/16/2015 11:44:01 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk