alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATION

I, Howard W. Lutnick,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Newmark Group, Inc.
for the year ended December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report.



/s/ HOWARD W. LUTNICKHoward W. LutnickChairmanDate: April 30, 2018
§ 19.515 What specific information is in the EPLS? ( a ) At a minimum, the *EPLS* indicates— ( 1 ) The full name (where available) and address of each excluded or disqualified person, in alphabetical order, with cross references if more than one name is involved in a single action;
( 2 ) The type of action;
( 3 ) The cause for the action;
( 4 ) The scope of the action;
( 5 ) Any termination date for the action;
( 6 ) The agency and name and telephone number of the agency point of contact for the action; and
( 7 ) The Dun and Bradstreet Number (DUNS), or other similar code approved by the GSA, of the excluded or disqualified person, if available.
( b ) ( 1 ) The database for the *EPLS* includes a field for the Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) (the social security number (SSN) for an individual) of an excluded or disqualified person.
( 2 ) Agencies disclose the SSN of an individual to verify the identity of an individual, only if permitted under the Privacy Act of 1974 and, if appropriate, the Computer Matching and Privacy Protection Act of 1988, as codified in 5 U.S.C. 552(a).
# L_2020257EN.01003901.xml

| 6.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 257/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 257/39

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1146 of 31 July 2020 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1956 as regards harmonised standards for certain household appliances, thermal-links, equipment in cable networks for television signals, sound signals and interactive services, circuit breakers, arc quenching and welding, installation couplers intended for permanent connection in fixed installations, transformers, reactors, power supply units and combinations, electric vehicle conductive charging system, cable ties and management, control circuit devices, switching elements, emergency lighting, electronic circuits used with luminaires and discharge lamps

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 250 of 3 August 2020
  )

On page 124, Articles 1 and 2:

for:

‘Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1956’,

read:

‘Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1956’.

---
(logo)****CURCIO

+COHEN

 

 

**Report of Independent RegisteredPublic Accounting Firm**

 

Managing Member

Park Bridge Lender ServicesLLC

New York, NY

 

 

We have examined management’sassertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Assessment of 2016Compliance by Park Bridge Lender Services LLC with Regulation AB ServicingCriteria (“Management’s Report”), that Park Bridge Lender Services LLC (the“Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) ofthe U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB as of and for theyear ended December 31, 2016, excluding those criteria noted as not applicable(N/A) within Exhibit B to Management’s Report. The transactions covered by thisreport are only those transactions processed by the Company in its capacity astrust advisor or operating advisor for the asset backed securities transactions(the “Platform”) identified in Management’s Report. Reference Exhibit A toManagement’s Report for the transactions covered by this examination.Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the applicableservicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’sassertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in thecircumstances. Our examination included testing of a selected sample of theservicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether the Companyperformed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria during the specified period. Our procedures were limited to theselected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company duringthe period covered by this report. Our examination was not designed to detectmaterial noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to orsubsequent to our tests, that may have affected the Company’s servicingactivities during the period covered by this report. We believe that ourexamination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination doesnot provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with theapplicable servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’sassertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicableservicing criteria identified in Exhibit B to Management’s Report with respectto the transactions identified in Exhibit A to Management’s Report as of andfor the year ended December 31, 2016, for the Platform, is fairly stated in allmaterial aspects.

 

 

/s/ Curcio & Cohen, CPA’s,P.C.

 

 

New York, NY

February 2, 2017

 

 

CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTSPC 7 PENN PLAZA, SUITE 1500 NEW YORK NY 10001

TEL: 212 557-9800  FAX:212 557 9819   WEBSITE: WWW.CWCCPAFIRM.COM
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R06-0AR-2005-NM-0007; FRL - _

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; New Mexico;

Transportation Conformity Requirement for Bernalillo County

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve a revision to the New Mexico State

Implementation Plan (SIP) at New Mexico Administrative Code 20.11.3, concerning

transportation conformity rules for Bernalillo County, New Mexico. The plan revision

is intended to ensure consistency with amendments to the federal Transportation

Conformity Rule. These plan revisions meet statutory and regulatory requirements, and

are consistent with EPA's guidance.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before [Insert date 30 days

from date of publication in the Federal Register].
2

ADDRESSES: Please see the related direct final rule, which is located in the "Rules

and Regulations" section ofthis Federal Register, for detailed instructions on how to

submit comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Riley, Air Planning Section

(6PD-L), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700,

Dallas, Texas 75202-2733, telephone 214-665-8542; fax number 214-665-7263; e-mail

address riley.jeffrey@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This document proposes to take action on SIP revisions submitted by the

Governor ofNew Mexico on behalf ofthe Albuquerque Environmental Health

Department. We have published a direct final rule approving the State's SIP revisions

in the "Rules and Regulations" section ofthis Federal Register because we view this as

a noncontroversial action and anticipate no adverse comment. We have explained our

reasons for this action in the preamble to the direct final rule.

If we receive no adverse comment, we will not take further action on this

proposed rule. Ifwe receive adverse comment, we will withdraw the direct final rule

and it will not take effect. We would address all public comments in any subsequent

final rule based upon this proposed rule.
We do not intend to institute a second comment period on this action. Any

parties interested in commenting must do so at this time. For further information,

please see the information provided in the ADDRESSES section ofthis document.

3

Lawrence E. Starfield,

r

Dated:

Acting Regional Administrator,

Region 6.
§ 801.5 Employee satisfaction measures. ( a ) The employee satisfaction numerical ratings to be given to a Business Operating Division (BOD) or equivalent office within the IRS will be determined on the basis of information gathered through various methods. For example, questionnaires, surveys, and other information gathering mechanisms may be employed to gather data regarding satisfaction. The information gathered will be used to measure, among other factors bearing upon employee satisfaction, the quality of supervision, and the adequacy of training and support services. All full and part-time permanent employees of a BOD or equivalent office who are in pay and duty status will have an opportunity to provide information regarding employee satisfaction under conditions that guarantee them confidentiality.
( b ) This section applies to the reporting of employee satisfaction information that occurs on or after March 7, 2018.
[T.D. 9831, 83 FR 9700, Mar. 7, 2018]
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 151 (Friday, August 7, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 39699]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19079]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION


Farm Credit Administration Board; Sunshine Act; Regular Meeting

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the 
Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), of the regular meeting of the Farm 
Credit Administration Board (Board).

Date and Time: The regular meeting of the Board will be held at the 
offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on 
August 13, 2009, from 9 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes its 
business.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roland E. Smith, Secretary to the Farm 
Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 883-4056.

ADDRESSES: Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, 
Virginia 22102-5090.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This meeting of the Board will be open to 
the public (limited space available). In order to increase the 
accessibility to Board meetings, persons requiring assistance should 
make arrangements in advance. The matters to be considered at the 
meeting are:

Open Session

A. Approval of Minutes
    <bullet> July 9, 2009
B. New Business
    <bullet> Farm Credit Administration Board Meetings--12 CFR Part 
604--Direct Final Rule
C. Reports
    <bullet> Office of Management Services Quarterly Report

    Dated: August 5, 2009.
Roland E. Smith,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. E9-19079 Filed 8-5-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1305

To require employers to notify workers before health care benefits or

retirement benefits are terminated.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 23, 1995

Mr. COSTELLO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities

A BILL

To require employers to notify workers before health care

benefits or retirement benefits are terminated.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Retired Worker Health

5 Security Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. BENEFIT NOTICE.

7 No employer may terminate the health care benefits

8 or retirement benefits it provides its employees before the

9 end of a 60-day period after the employer serves written
2

•HR 1305 IH

1 notice of such termination to the employees and to the

2 labor organization representatives of such employees.

3 SEC. 3. DEFINITION.

4 For purposes of section 2, the term ‘‘employer’’

5 means any business enterprise which has 100 or more em6 ployees or 500 or more employees who have retired and

7 receive or will receive health and pension benefits from

8 such enterprise.

9 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

10 Section 2 shall take effect 180 days after the date

11 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

The Honorable Barry Ted Moskowitz, United States District Judge for ***

the Southern District of California, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CLIFFORD CHEW,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

GUY HALL, Warden, TRCI,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 09-35801

D.C. No. 6:07-cv-01330-AA

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Ann L. Aiken, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 9, 2010** 

Seattle, Washington

Before: O’SCANNLAIN and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges, and MOSKOWITZ,

District Judge.*** 

FILED

DEC 16 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

Chew claims that the trial court violated his Sixth Amendment rights when it

appointed Earl Woods to advise his brother Rodney before Rodney testified. 

However, Chew did not object to the court’s decision at trial, and he did not fairly

present his claim of trial court error on direct appeal to the Oregon Court of

Appeals or the Oregon Supreme Court. He failed to reference federal law or the

United States Constitution in his Balfour brief, and he cited no cases in support of

his claim that would have alerted those courts to the federal nature of his claim. 

See Fields v. Waddington, 401 F.3d 1018, 1021 (9th Cir. 2005). Oregon law

therefore barred Chew from bringing this claim of trial court error in state postconviction review proceedings. See Palmer v. State, 867 P.2d 1368, 1373 (Or.

1994). 

Because Chew was procedurally barred from raising the issue in state postconviction review, his federal claim is likewise procedurally defaulted. Coleman v.

Thompson, 501 U.S. 722, 728–29 (1991). Chew has not demonstrated cause for

the default or actual prejudice as a result of the alleged violation of federal law. Id.

at 750. Nor has Chew shown that “failure to consider the claims would result in a

fundamental miscarriage of justice.” Id.

Insofar as Chew claims that Woods violated his Sixth Amendment right to

conflict-free counsel by advising Rodney, Chew fails to state a viable Sixth
3

Amendment claim. Mickens v. Taylor, 535 U.S. 162, 174 (2002). Woods did not

represent Chew at trial, and had not represented Chew for the six weeks before

trial. Therefore, Chew cannot possibly show that an “actual conflict of interest

adversely affected his lawyer’s performance.” Cuyler v. Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335,

349 (1980) (emphasis added).

AFFIRMED
October 9, 2012

VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION Federal Aviation Administration c/o U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 800 Independence Avenue Washington, D.C. 2059 1 - 0004 Re: Petition for Renewal of Exemption Number 10205 Regulatory

Docket Number FAA- 2011 - 0003 To Whom It May

Concern: This letter serves as a petition to renew Exemption Number 10205, Docket Number FAA 2011 - 003 issued to the Texas Aviation Hall of Fame, home of the Lone Star Flight Museum, which exempts the operation of our Boeing B - 17 Flying Fortress (N900RW), North American B - 25 Mitchell (N333RW) and North American TF - 51 Mustang (N4151D) aircraft from 14 C.F.R. § 91.315 while conducting instructional flights . The Texas Aviation Hall of Fame has held this exemption for conducting instructional flights in the above Limited Category Aircraft since 2011 and has operated these aircraft at an equivalent level of safety without incident or compromise to aviation safety . There has not been any significant change to the reasons relative to the public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption . We have successfully operated under the conditions and limitations contained in the original exemption and believe they

achieve an increased level of safety for the public. Therefore, we respectfully request that the Exemption No. 10205 be renewed in its current form and that its effectiveness be extended until January 31, 2015. If there are any

questions or need for additional information, pl e ase contact me at 409 - 740 - 7722 or via email at larry@lonestarflight.org . Regards, Larry Gregory President Texas Aviation Hall of Fame **Texas A viation Hall of Fame**  P.O. Box 3099  Galveston, Texas 77552  Tel: (409)740 - 7722  Fax: (409)740 - 7612  Em ail: flight@lonestarflight.org
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1218 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  Union Calendar No. 42
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1218

                          [Report No. 104-88]

To extend the authority of the Federal Communications Commission to use 
         competitive bidding in granting licenses and permits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 13, 1995

  Mr. Bliley introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Commerce

                             March 23, 1995

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the authority of the Federal Communications Commission to use 
         competitive bidding in granting licenses and permits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.

    Section 309(j)(11) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 
309(j)(11)) is amended by striking ``September 30, 1998'' and inserting 
``September 30, 2000''.
                                     

                                                  Union Calendar No. 42

104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1218

                          [Report No. 104-88]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To extend the authority of the Federal Communications Commission to use 
         competitive bidding in granting licenses and permits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 23, 1995

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1059 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1059

     To require the Secretary of Agriculture to extend a nutrition 
     assistance program to American Samoa, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 27, 1995

 Mr. Faleomavaega introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                      the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To require the Secretary of Agriculture to extend a nutrition 
     assistance program to American Samoa, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF NUTRITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM TO AMERICAN SAMOA.

    The first sentence of section 601(c) of Public Law 96-597 (48 
U.S.C. 1469d(c)) is amended by inserting before the period at the end 
the following: ``, and the Secretary of Agriculture shall extend a 
nutrition assistance program conducted under the Food Stamp Act of 1977 
(7 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.) to American Samoa''.
                                 <all>
```
p130176.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0176 Focus Ready Draft 1/10/2013

ENGINEER: El-Zoobi \ AHp130176.eng

Consumer Use: No

SAT (concerns) (01/04/2013): Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info:

Migration to groundwater: Negligible PBT rating: P3B3T1 PMN: P3B1T1. Deg Pdt: P3B3T1. Health: 1 Not Required Eco: 1 No releases to Water

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1B

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0176

Page 2p130176.eng

Page 3
II

Calendar No. 234

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1051

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 14, 1995

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar

AN ACT

To provide for the extension of certain hydroelectric projects

located in the State of West Virginia.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the time period

5 specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16

6 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to Federal Energy

7 Regulatory Commission projects numbered 6901 and
2

HR 1051 PCS

1 6902, the Commission shall, upon the request of the li2 censee for those projects, in accordance with the good

3 faith, due diligence, and public interest requirements of

4 that section, the Commission’s procedures under that sec5 tion, and the procedures specified in that section, extend

6 the time period during which the licensee is required to

7 commence construction of those projects so as to termi8 nate on October 3, 1999.

9 (b) APPLICABILITY.—Subsection (a) shall take effect

10 for the projects upon the expiration of the extension, is11 sued by the Commission under section 13 of the Federal

12 Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806), of the period required for

13 commencement of construction of the projects.

14 (c) REINSTATEMENT OF EXPIRED LICENSE.—If a li15 cense for a project described in subsection (a) has expired

16 prior to the date of enactment of this Act, the Commission

17 shall reinstate the license effective as of the date of its

18 expiration and extend the time required for commence19 ment of construction of the project until October 3, 1999.

Passed the House of Representatives November 13,

1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.

Calendar No. 234

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1051

AN ACT

To provide for the extension of certain hydroelectric

projects located in the State of West Virginia.

NOVEMBER 14, 1995

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar
#### § 521.110 Government wages, salaries, pensions and similar remuneration.

Under Article X (1) of the convention any wage, salary, similar compensation or pension paid by the Government of Denmark or by any other public authority within Denmark to an individual in the United States is exempt from Federal income tax for taxable years beginning on and after January 1, 1948. By reason, however, of the application of Article XV (a) of the convention, such exemption does not apply to recipients of such income who are either citizens of the United States or alien residents therein. As to the taxation generally of compensation of alien employees of foreign governments, see section 116(h) of the Internal Revenue Code and § 29.116-2 of Regulations 111 (26 CFR 1949 ed. Supps. 29.116-2) [and § 39.116-2 of Regulations 118 (26 CFR, Rev. 1953, Parts 1-79, and Supps.)].