alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1203 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1203

To provide an exemption for small cargo tank vehicles of 3,500 gallons 
   or less, transporting petroleum products, from certain hazardous 
                  material transportation regulations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 1995

 Mr. Franks of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. Allard, Mr. Bereuter, and 
 Mr. LaHood) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide an exemption for small cargo tank vehicles of 3,500 gallons 
   or less, transporting petroleum products, from certain hazardous 
                  material transportation regulations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Hazardous Materials Regulatory 
Relief Act of 1995''.

SEC. 2. CARGO TANK EXEMPTION.

    The Secretary of Transportation shall exclude from the provisions 
of part 180 of title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations, any cargo 
tank vehicle of 3500 gallons or less of capacity, used to transport 
petroleum products in intrastate or interstate transportation within 
100 air miles of the principal place of business of the owner or lessee 
of the vehicle.
                                 <all>
```
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

VALENCIA GARNER, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-4809 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Respondent. ) ) Opinion filed May 1, 2019. Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Thomas P. Barber, Judge. Julianne M. Holt, Public Defender, Tampa, for Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kiersten E. Jensen, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Denied.

LaROSE, C.J., and VILLANTI and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 205.13 How do you determine when State or Federal interest liability accrues? ( a ) State or Federal interest liability may or may not accrue when mutually agreed to funding techniques are applied, depending on the terms of the Treasury-State agreement.
( b ) We and a State may agree in a Treasury-State agreement that no State or Federal interest liability will accrue for indirect costs or indirect allocated costs based on an indirect cost rate. This indirect cost must be consistent with OMB Circular A-87 (For availability, see 5 CFR 1310.3.) and be in accordance with this subpart A. The indirect cost rate may be a Statewide indirect cost rate or a public assistance cost rate, where appropriate.
#### § 29.104 Schedule for Federal Benefit Payments.

Federal Benefit Payments are payable on the first business day of the month following the month in which the benefit accrues. (See § 29.105(b).)
#### § 3.23 Approval of claims.

Claims shall be approved, disapproved, or compromised by the head of the bureau or office or his designee, taking into consideration the recommendation of the legal division.
§ 22.12 Effect on other regulations, forms, and instructions. ( a ) *Effect on other regulations.* All regulations, orders, or like directions issued before the effective date of this part by any officer of the Department of the Treasury which impose requirements designed to prohibit any discrimination against individuals on the grounds of race, color, or national origin under any program to which this part applies, and which authorize the suspension or termination of or refusal to grant or to continue federal financial assistance to any applicant for a recipient of such assistance for failure to comply with such requirements, are hereby superseded to the extent that such discrimination is prohibited by this part, except that nothing in this part may be considered to relieve any person of any obligation assumed or imposed under any such superseded regulation, order, instruction, or like direction before the effective date of this part. Nothing in this part, however, supersedes any of the following (including future amendments thereof): ( 1 ) Executive Order 11246 (3 CFR, 1965 Supp., p. 167) and regulations issued thereunder; or
( 2 ) Any other orders, regulations, or instructions, insofar as such orders, regulations, or instructions prohibit discrimination on the ground of race, color, or national origin in any program or situation to which this part is inapplicable, or prohibit discrimination on any other ground.
( b ) *Forms and instructions.* The designated Agency official shall issue and promptly make available to all interested persons forms and detailed instructions and procedures for effectuating this part as applied to programs to which this part applies and for which the designated Agency official is responsible.
( c ) *Supervision and coordination.* The designated Agency official may from time to time assign to officials of the Agency, or to officials of other departments or agencies of the Government with the consent of such departments or agencies, responsibilities in connection with the effectuation of the purposes of Title VI and this part (other than responsibility for final decision as provided in § 22.10), including the achievement of effective coordination and maximum uniformity within the Agency and within the Executive Branch of the Government in the application of Title VI and this part to similar programs and in similar situations. Any action taken, determination made or requirement imposed by an official of another department or agency acting pursuant to an assignment of responsibility under this paragraph shall have the same effect as though such action had been taken by the designated Agency official of the Department.
#### § 1029.100 Definitions.

Refer to § 1010.100 of this Chapter for general definitions not noted herein.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Hiki Alston, Appellant.

[808 NYS2d 86]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Silverman, J.), rendered June 7, 1999, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Martin, J.), of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence and his statements to law enforcement authorities. By decision and order dated March 11, 2002 [292 AD2d 457], this Court remitted the matter to the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hall, J.), to hear and report on the issue of whether a memo book of one of the *488arresting police officers was available, and if not, what efforts were made by the respondent to locate the memo book, and the appeal was held in abeyance in the interim.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, there was reasonable suspicion to stop him. The defendant and a companion, who were the only persons on the street, were spotted in the area where, just moments before, the police officers heard gun shots *(see*CPL 140.50 [1]; *Terry v Ohio,*392 US 1 [1968]; *People v De Bour,*40 NY2d 210 [1976]). The defendant’s failure to respond to the police officers’ question upon being approached, and his actions, consisting of turning and placing his hand on his waistband while engaging in a shoving motion, justified the initial frisk *(see People v Benjamin,*51 NY2d 267 [1980]; *People v Celaj,*306 AD2d 71 [2003], *affd*1 NY3d 588 [2004]; *Matter of Jakiyo L.,*256 AD2d 466 [1998]; *People v Sanders,*235 AD2d 507 [1997]; *People v McDonald,*227 AD2d 309 [1996]). The defendant’s subsequent attempt to evade being frisked and his striking of one of the police officers justified the more intrusive search that followed his arrest. Accordingly, the motion to suppress was properly denied.

Following remittitur for a hearing on the facts regarding the availability of a memo book of one of the arresting police officers *(see People v Alston,*292 AD2d 457 [2002]), we reject the defendant’s contention that a sanction should be imposed for the inadvertent loss of the memo book, under the circumstances of this case, where the defendant failed to demonstrate any prejudice owing to the loss *(see People v Banch,*80 NY2d 610, 616 [1992]; *People v Haupt,*71 NY2d 929, 931 [1988]). Moreover, the drastic remedy of dismissal of the indictment was not warranted under the circumstances of this case *(see People v Haupt, id.; People v Kelly,*62 NY2d 516, 521 [1984]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Goldstein and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
#### § 21.410 Enforcement.

The head of each agency shall take such actions as are necessary to ensure that the provisions herein are vigorously implemented and enforced in that agency.
#### § 601.522 Power of attorney.

Except as otherwise provided in this section, a power of attorney, or copy thereof, will be required for a representative of a principal (a) to perform the acts specified in paragraph (c)(1) of § 601.502; or (b) to sign any application, bond, notice, return, report, or other document required by, or provided for in, regulations issued pursuant to chapter 51 (Distilled Spirits, Wines, and Beer), Chapter 52 (Cigars, Cigarettes, and Cigarette Papers and Tubes), and chapter 53 (Machine Guns, Destructive Devices, and Certain Other Firearms), Internal Revenue Code, title 1 of the Gun Control Act of 1968, or the Federal Alcohol Administration Act, which is filed with or acted on by (1) the office of a regional regulatory administrator in the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, or (2) the Director, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms. The power of attorney may be executed on Form 1534, copies of which may be obtained from the regional regulatory administrator in the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms. A power of attorney will not be required for a person authorized to sign on behalf of the principal by articles of incorporation, bylaws, or a board of directors, where an acceptable copy of such authorization is on file in the office of the regional regulatory administrator or of the Director. A power of attorney filed under the provisions of this section may cover one or more acts for which a power of attorney is required and will continue in effect with respect to such acts until revoked as provided in § 601.526. The exceptions to the requirements for a power of attorney contained in paragraph (c) (3) and (4) of § 601.502 are applicable to powers of attorney under this section.

[34 FR 14603, Sept. 19, 1969, as amended at 45 FR 7259, Feb. 1, 1980]
#### § 1023.600 General.

Brokers or dealers in securities are subject to the special standards of diligence; prohibitions; and special measures requirements set forth and cross referenced in this subpart. Brokers or dealers in securities should also refer to subpart F of part 1010 of this chapter for special standards of diligence; prohibitions; and special measures contained in that subpart which apply to brokers or dealers in securities.
#### The North Rollingwood Property Owners Association et al. *v.*The City Plan Commission of the City of New Britain et al.

*Austin K. Wolf,*with whom was *John F. Downes,*for the appellee (defendant Daughters of Mary of Immaculate Conception, Inc.); with him also was *Algert F. Politis,*for the appellee (named defendant).

*John D. Bagdasarian,*for the appellants (plaintiffs).

Argued April 7

decided April 7, 1964

The motion by the defendants to dismiss the appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Hartford County is denied.
NOTICE: NOT FOR PUBLICATION.
UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE
LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS
D IVISION O NE

BRADLEY J. FOLKESTAD, M.D. and LISA FOLKESTAD, husband and wife; BRADLEY J. FOLKESTAD, M.D., L.T.D., an Arizona professional corporation
, P etitioner s ,

v.

THE HONORABLE MICHAEL J. HERROD, Judge of the SUPERIOR
COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA, in and for the C ounty of MARICOPA, Respondent Judge

,

MARVIN L. ERICKSON, M.D., an individual; DAMIAN J. BASS, M.D., an

individual; DANIEL H. HU, M.D., an individual, Real Parties in Interest

.

N o . 1 CA

- SA 14

- 0 105

Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County
No. CV 2008

- 026970 The Honorable Michael J. Herrod

, Judge

JURISDICTION ACCEPTE D; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Gillespie Shields & Durrant , Phoenix By Dan M. Durrant Counsel for P etitioner2 Beus Gilbert P LLC

, Phoenix By Leo R. Beus, Thomas A. Connelly , Sarah S. Letzkus C ounsel for Real Parties in Interest

DECISION ORDER

Presiding Judge Patricia K. Norris delivered the decision of the Court, in which Judge Samuel A . Thumma and Judge Kent E. Cattani joined.

N O R R I S , Judge:

¶1 This special action arises out of an order entered by the superior court setting this matter for trial to the court with an advisory jury. The court, Presiding Judge Patricia K. Norris, and Judges Samuel A. Thumma and Kent E. Cattani, participating, has c onsidered the parties written submissions. Because an order denying or granting a jury trial is not separately appealable

, see A riz

. R ev

. S tat . § 12

- 2101 (Supp. 2013), a petition for special action is an appropriate method of seeking review. Hoyle v. Sup erior Cour t , 161 Ariz. 224, 226, 778 P.2d 259, 261 (App. 1989)

. Accordingly

, we accept jurisdiction but deny relief.

¶2 Even if the court assumes the parties agreed to waive their right to request a jury trial, Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure 39(m) author izes a superior court in an action not triable of right by a jur y to, on its own initiative, try any issue with an advisory jury. T hus, t he superior court did not abuse its discretion in setting this matter for trial with an advisory jury. Cf. Ringling B ros. & Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc. v. Superior Court , 140 Ariz. 38, 42, 680 P.2d 174, 178 (App. 1984) ( superior court has discretion to submit jurisdictional issue to advisory jury).
- Office Home
- About Us
- Priority Areas
- Remarks and Releases

HomeOffice of the U.S. Special Coordinator for the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment...About Us

# 									About Us							

Office of the U.S. Special Coordinator for the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment

At the June 2022 G7 Leaders’ Summit, President Biden and G7 leaders formally launched the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment (PGI) — a values-driven, high-impact, and transparent infrastructure partnership to meet the enormous infrastructure needs of low- and middle-income countries and support the United States’ and its allies’ economic and national security interests.

PGI offers a positive alternative to models of infrastructure financing and delivery that are often opaque, fail to uphold environmental and social standards, exploit workers, and leave the recipient countries worse off. The U.S. government aims to offer a credible alternative that can leverage public and private financing around priority areas of clean energy supply chains, trusted information and communications technology networks, connective transportation infrastructure such as railroads and ports, and resilient health systems while advancing gender equality and equity; raising labor and environmental standards; and promoting transparency, governance, and anticorruption measures.

At the G7 Summit in 2022, President Biden announced that the United States aims to mobilize $200 billion for PGI over the next 5 years through grants, Federal financing, and leveraging private sector investments. Together with G7 partners and programs such as the EU’s Global Gateway and the UK’s British International Investment, PGI aims to mobilize $600 billion by 2027 in global infrastructure investments, including from other like-minded partners, multilateral development banks, development finance institutions, sovereign wealth funds, and more.

Back to Top
§ 49.4252-5 Teletypewriter exchange service. ( a ) *In general.* The term “teletypewriter exchange service” means any service where a teletypewriter (or similar device) may be connected, directly or indirectly, to an exchange operated by a person engaged in the business of furnishing communication service, if by means of such connection communication may be established with any other teletypewriter (or similar device). If the teletypewriter or similar device used in conjunction with such service may be connected to such an exchange, the service constitutes teletypewriter exchange service whether or not it is the practice of the subscriber to the service to make such connection, and whether or not the person engaged in the business of furnishing communication service permits the subscriber to make such connection.
( b ) *Amounts paid.* In determining the amount of tax due, the amount paid for the service shall include all charges made in connection with the furnishing of any teletypewriter exchange service, such as salaries of operators, if in the employ of the person furnishing such service, charges for equipment, instruments, and other apparatus. In cases where a person leases lines or channels, equipment, and other facilities used in conjunction with teletypewriter exchange service, the amounts paid by such person for such lines or channels, equipment, and other facilities constitute amounts paid for teletypewriter exchange service, notwithstanding the fact that the lines or channels, equipment, and other facilities used in conjunction with such service are supplied by different persons or in part by the user of such service.
( c ) *Exemptions.* For exemptions from the tax imposed on amounts paid for teletypewriter exchange service, see sections 4253, 4292, 4293, and 4294, and the regulations thereunder contained in this part.
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY


ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Invitation Homes Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ernest M. Freedman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|   |                                                                                                                      
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:/s/ Ernest M. FreedmanErnest M. FreedmanChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)








March 30, 2017





A signed original of this certification required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.














001409-0025-11741-Active.21201846.1
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 226.3 Application—termination. ( a ) Every Insurance Organization applying for recognition as a qualified insurer of financial institutions designated as Treasury tax and loan depositaries shall address a written request to the Assistant Commissioner, Comptroller, Bureau of the Fiscal Service, Department of the Treasury, Washington, DC 20226, who will notify the applicant of the data which is necessary to make application. If the Secretary of the Treasury is satisfied that: ( 1 ) One or more institutions insured by the applicant otherwise meet the Secretary's requirements for designation as a Treasury tax and loan depositary or Federal tax depositary,
( 2 ) The insurance provided by the applicant covers public money of the United States, and
( 3 ) The insurance coverage provided affords adequate security to the Government's deposits, the Secretary shall recognize the applicant as a qualified insurer of financial institutions designated as Treasury tax and loan depositaries.
( b ) If and when the Secretary of the Treasury determines that a qualified insurance organization's financial condition is such that it no longer provides adequate security or that it is not complying with the regulations of this part, the Secretary will notify the Insurance Organization of the facts or conduct which cause him to make such determination, and in those cases where the safety of the Government's funds allows, provide the Insurance Organization with an opportunity to correct the deficiency. When any deficiency has not been corrected to his satisfaction or, where the safety of Government funds makes immediate revocation imperative, the Secretary will revoke the recognition previously granted.
Note:
For a delegation of authority to perform the functions described in §§ 226.3 and 226.4, see 44 FR 19406 of the Federal Register of April 3, 1979.
[43 FR 18972, May 2, 1978, as amended at 44 FR 19406, Apr. 3, 1979; 49 FR 47002, Nov. 30, 1984]