alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo)  PNC

           REAL ESTATE |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

 

 MIDLANDLOAN SERVICES

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE

of

PNC BANK, NATIONALASSOCIATION

d/b/a MIDLAND LOANSERVICES

 

 

Pursuantto the requirements of the applicable Servicing Agreement for the transactions listedon Schedule I hereto, the undersigned, Timothy Steward, as Senior VicePresident of Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, NationalAssociation, hereby certifies, subject to any limitations listed on Schedule Ihereto, as of the date hereof, solely in his capacity as an officer and not inhis individual capacity, as follows:

 

1.      Areview of the Servicer’s activities during the calendar year 2018 (the“Reporting Period”) and of its performance under the Agreement has been madeunder the undersigned officer’s supervision; and

 

2.      To thebest of the undersigned officer’s knowledge, based on such review, the Servicerhas fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all materialrespects throughout the Reporting Period. except for the following materialinstance of noncompliance with Regulation AB servicing criteria1122(d)(3)(i)(A), which is applicable to all transactions serviced on theEnterprise! Loan Management System (the “Platform”) during the year endedDecember 31, 2018, as follows:

 

“1122(d)(3)(i) –Reports to investors, including those to be filed with the Commission, aremaintained in accordance with the transaction agreements and applicableCommission requirements. Specifically, such reports: (A) Are prepared inaccordance with timeframes and other terms set forth in the transactionagreements.”

 

 

Dated:March 1, 2019

 

PNCBank, National Association 

d/b/aMidland Loan Services

 

/s/Timothy Steward

TimothySteward

SeniorVice President

 

**Memberof The PNC Financial Services Group**

10851Mastin Boulevard Overland Park, Kansas 66210

800-327-8083

www.pnc.com/midland

 

 

**ScheduleI**

**CCRECommercial Mortgage Securities LP**

| **Recipient  Role**                                                                                   | **Deal  Name**                          | **Series  Number** | **Midland  Role**           |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|--------------------|-----------------------------|
| Depositor                                                                                             | CCRE Commercial Mortgage Securities, LP | Series 2016-C7     | Master and Special Servicer |
| Depositor                                                                                             | CCRE Commercial Mortgage Securities, LP | Series 2017-C8     |                        |
| Master and Special Servicer on the Google Kirkland Campus Phase  II loan under the CFCRE 2016-C7 PSA. |

** **
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                          42,714
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     19,676
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                65,124
<PP&E>                                       1,040,640
<DEPRECIATION>                                 139,833
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,350,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          557,358
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,617,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,383,727)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,350,219
<SALES>                                        771,171
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               771,171
<CGS>                                          581,212
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  581,212
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               325,950
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (38,538)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (233,253)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (233,253)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (233,253)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)
        

</TABLE>
# L_2020166EN.01000101.xml

| 28.5.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 166/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 166/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2020/708

of 19 May 2020

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Brousse du Rove’ (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, France’s application to register the name ‘Brousse du Rove’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, France’s application to register the name ‘Brousse du Rove’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Brousse du Rove’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Brousse du Rove’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Brousse du Rove’ (PDO) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.3. Cheeses, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 May 2020.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 26, 27.1.2020, p. 8.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
Exhibit 32.2
                                                           ------------


             STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
             SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      The undersigned, Deborah A. McLaughlin, is the Chief Financial
Officer and Chief Operating Officer of Slade's Ferry Bancorp. (the
"Company"). This statement is being furnished in connection with the
filing by the Company of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report").

By execution of this statement, I certify that:

A)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)
      or 78o(d)); and

B)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
      covered by the Report.

      This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the
Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as
the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350. It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be
filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

Date:  November 10, 2004               /s/ Deborah A. McLaughlin
       -----------------               --------------------------------
                                       Deborah A. McLAughlin
                                         Chief Financial Officer/Chief
                                       Operating Officer


<PAGE>
```

[106th Congress Public Law 368]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ368.106]

[[Page 114 STAT. 1416]]

Public Law 106-368
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to enter into contracts with 
  the Weber Basin Water Conservancy District, Utah, to use Weber Basin 
    Project facilities for the impounding, storage, and carriage of 
    nonproject water for domestic, municipal, industrial, and other 
      beneficial purposes. <<NOTE: Oct. 27, 2000 -  [H.R. 3236]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Secretary of 
the Interior may enter into contracts with the Weber Basin Water 
Conservancy District or any of its member unit contractors under the Act 
of February 21, 1911 (43 U.S.C. 523), for--
            (1) the impounding, storage, and carriage of nonproject 
        water for domestic, municipal, industrial, and other beneficial 
        purposes, using facilities associated with the Weber Basin 
        Project, Utah; and
            (2) the exchange of water among Weber Basin Project 
        contractors, for the purposes set forth in paragraph (1), using 
        facilities associated with the Weber Basin Project, Utah.

    Approved October 27, 2000.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3236:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 106-742 (Comm. on Resources).
SENATE REPORTS: No. 106-434 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):
            July 25, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 13, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
www.gpo.gov

### §763. Transferred

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 93–112, title II, §203, Sept. 26, 1973, 87 Stat. 376, relating to making of grants and contracts for training of personnel involved in vocational services to handicapped individuals, was redesignated as section 304 of Pub. L. 93–112 and transferred to section 774 of this title.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 157 (Monday, August 17, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 41413]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19609]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13410-000]


Clean River Power MR-9, LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit 
Application Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To 
Intervene, and Competing Applications

August 6, 2009.
    On March 25, 2009, Clean River Power MR-9, LLC filed an 
application, pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act, 
proposing to study the feasibility of the Ellis Lock and Dam Water 
Power Project, to be located at the State of Ohio's Ellis lock and dam 
on the Muskingum River in Muskingum County, Ohio.
    The proposed Ellis Lock and Dam Project would consist of: (1) The 
existing 15.3-foot-high, 340-foot-long concrete dam; (2) the existing 
352-acre reservoir with a 1,461 acre-foot storage capacity; (3) a new 
150-foot-long, 100-foot-wide intake structure; (4) a 40-foot-long, 100-
foot-wide power canal; (5) a new powerhouse containing four proposed 
generating units with a total installed capacity of 2.4 megawatts; (6) 
a new 200-foot-long tailrace; (7) a new switchyard containing a single 
three-phase step-up transformer; and (8) a new 100-foot-long, 34.5-
kilovolt overhead transmission line. The project would have an 
estimated average annual generation of 9,700 megawatt-hours.
    Applicant Contact: Mr. Alan Skelly, 8425 Beechmont Avenue, 
Cincinnati, OH 45255, phone (513) 375-9242.
    FERC Contact: Michael Spencer, (202) 502-6093.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing 
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file 
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice. 
Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing 
applications may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site 
under the ``e-Filing'' link. If unable to be filed electronically, 
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight 
copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For 
more information on how to submit these types of filings please go to 
the Commission's Web site located at http:[sol][sol]www.ferc.gov/
filing-comments.asp. More information about this project can be viewed 
or printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of Commission's Web site at 
http:[sol][sol]www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the docket 
number (P-13410) in the docket number field to access the document. For 
assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-19609 Filed 8-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
www.gpo.gov

### §1621i. Managed care feasibility study

(a) The Secretary, acting through the Service, shall conduct a study to assess the feasibility of allowing an Indian tribe to purchase, directly or through the Service, managed care coverage for all members of the tribe from—

(1) a tribally owned and operated managed care plan; or

(2) a State licensed managed care plan.

(b) Not later than the date which is 12 months after October 29, 1992, the Secretary shall transmit to the Congress a report containing—

(1) a detailed description of the study conducted pursuant to this section; and

(2) a discussion of the findings and conclusions of such study.

(Pub. L. 94–437, title II, §210, as added Pub. L. 102–573, title II, §206(b), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4549.)
#### WILLIAM FRYE WHITE, RECEIVER, v. THE UNITED STATES.

[48 C. Cls. R., 169; 241 U. S. R., 149.]

The contract in this case relates to a filtration plant in the District of Columbia. The claimant contracts to build certain embankments and to fill in earth “ *and all other fills and embankments shown by the plan or directed to be made by the*
      *493
      *engineer officer in charge.”*The contractor is not ordered to build a roadway, but the engineers from time to time furnish him with lines showing the direction of the road and stakes showing the grade. The work is done under their inspection. Vouchers for it are given and he is paid about $12,000 on account of work done on said roadway and on estimates made by the Government engineers. It is then held that the Government was not liable under the contract for building the road, and in the final settlement the $12,000 previously paid is deducted and withheld.

The court below decides:

Where the provision in a contract for filling in earth is specific in character, it excludes every other kind of filling unless there be some clearly shown by specifications.

It is a well-settled rule that when there is a conflict between the contract and the specifications, the contract must govern; but if the deduction from the contract is only by inference and the specifications are clear and beyond question a different rule will prevail.

In this case the court compares the contract and the specifications and holds that though different in form they have a common object, and that no conflict exists between them.

Where a contractor was not required or authorized by the contract to construct a roadway, but did so with his waste material, which he had to dispose of; and he would have been compelled to pay for a place to deposit it on if he had not been allowed to construct the roadway with it, his doing so must be regarded as enjoyment of a privilege and not as work done under an implied contract. The officers of the Government who permitted it were justified in overseeing and directing the work to the end that it should not interfere with the general plan of the project.

The allowance for a time by the engineers in charge of this work as work to be paid for is not a practical construction of the contract, if it was, during the progress of the work, reversed. The rule prevails only where the contract is susceptible of more than one interpretation.

Where the work was voluntarily done by a party without authority, he can not recover upon *quantum meruit*if the work involved no extra expense to himself.

The decision of the court below is reversed.

Mr. Justice McKenna

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court May 1,1916.
#### § 3.3 Legal review.

Any claim that exceeds $500, involves personal injuries or automobile damage, or arises out of an incident that is likely to result in multiple claimants, shall be forwarded to the legal division of the bureau or office out of whose activities the claim arose. The claim, together with the reports of the employee and the investigation, shall be reviewed in the legal division which shall thereupon make a recommendation that the claim be approved, disapproved, or compromised, and shall advise on the need for referral of the claim to the Department of Justice. This recommendation and advice, together with the file, shall be forwarded to the head of the bureau or office or his designee.

[35 FR 6429, Apr. 22, 1970, as amended at 48 FR 16253, Apr. 15, 1983]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Transportation Safety Board

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Vicky D'Onofrio, (202) 314-6410.

Dated: August 14, 2009.

Vicky D'Onofrio,

Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. E9-19900 Filed 8-14-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7533-01-P
NUMBER 13-19-00583-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

JOE ANGEL VILLARREAL, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 156th District Court

of Bee County, Texas.

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Hinojosa

Order Per Curiam

Currently pending before the Court is appellant's request to review the record in 

the above-referenced cause. Appellant's counsel has filed an Anders brief herein and 

appellant has been unable to examine the record so that he can file a pro se brief. 
2

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the trial court ensure that appellant has 

the opportunity to fully examine the appellate record on or before May 1, 2020, and it is 

FURTHER ORDERED that the trial court notify this Court as to the date upon which the 

appellate record was made available to appellant. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

Appellant shall have thirty (30) days from the day the appellate record was first 

made available to him to file his pro se brief with this Court. The State shall have twenty 

days thereafter to file its response, if any.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

7th day of April, 2020.
#### Linda STREET and Jesse Dewayne WICKLIFFE *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 97-1 and CR 96-108

959 S.W.2d 744

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered January 21, 1998

*140Per Curiam.

In our order issued January 16, 1998, we issued a bench warrant for the arrest and immediate detention of A. Wayne Davis, counsel for Appellant Linda Street, pursuant to Davis’s failure to appear before this court on January 15, 1998, to show cause why he should not be held in contempt for his failure to perfect Street’s appeal in a timely manner. *See Street v. State,*330 Ark. 853, 956 S.W.2d 866 (1997) *(per*curiam); *Street v. State,*331 Ark. 138, 957 S.W.2d 187 (1998) *(per curiam).*

Similarly, we had previously issued an order requiring Davis, as counsel for Appellant Jesse Dewayne Wickliffe, to appear before this court on October 16, 1997, and show cause why he should not be held in contempt for his failure to perfect Wickliffe’s appeal in a timely manner. *See Wickliffe v. State,*330 Ark. 97, 952 S.W.2d 144 (1997).

A hearing was conducted on each of these matters on this date, during which this court granted Davis’s motion to have the issues in each case resolved simultaneously. Davis then entered pleas of guilty for his failure to perfect both appeals. We accepted Davis’s guilty pleas and, pursuant to the request of Davis and his attorney, John Wesley Hall Jr., we have agreed to allow Davis the opportunity to submit to this court affidavits in mitigation for his failure to perfect the appeals, provided that such affidavits are filed with the clerk of this court by 5:00 p.m., January 27, 1998. The matter will be taken under advisement pending the receipt of the affidavits.

Additionally, Davis entered a plea of not guilty to the failure to appear before this court as scheduled at 9:00 a.m. on January 15, 1998, and offered an explanation for his absence. Notwithstanding, we find Davis to be in direct contempt of this court for his failure to appear as scheduled. We wifi, however, permit Davis to submit an affidavit in mitigation (if he so desires) as to the finding of contempt, provided that such affidavit is filed with the clerk of this court by 5:00 p.m., January 27, 1998. We wifi reserve any decision as to the appropriate sanction for the contempt pending the receipt of such affidavit.

We further direct the Sheriff of Pulaski County to release Davis from custody, resulting from our bench order issued on January 16, 1998, subject to any other outstanding detainers or warrants, if any, of which the Sheriff is aware.