alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
O pinion filed Ju ly 28 , 201 6



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

___ ___ ____ No. 11

- 1 6

- 00 0 85

- C V

____ __ ____ IN THE INTEREST OF D.F.M. AND Z.M.C. , CHILD REN

On Appeal from the 318th District Court Midland County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. FM 58,607

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N This is an appeal from an order in which the trial court terminat ed the parental rights of the mother and the fathers of D.F.M. and Z.M.C

. The mo ther filed a notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal.
The mo ther’s court

- appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw and a supporting brief in which he professionally and conscientiously examines the record and applicable law and conclude s that the appeal is frivolous. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See In re Schulman , 252 S.W.3d 403 , 406

– 08 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008); High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807 , 812 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978).2

In light of a recent holding by the Texas Supreme Court, however, an Anders motion
to withdraw “ may be premature ” if filed in the court of appeals u nder the circumstances presented in this case. See In re P.M. , No. 15

- 0171, 2016 WL 1274748, at *3 (Tex. Apr. 1, 2016). The court in P.M. stated that “a ppointed
counsel ’ s obligations can be satisfied by filing a petition for review that satisfies the
standards for an Anders brief. ” I d. Appellant’s counsel provided Appellant with a copy of the brief and the
motion to withdraw and informed Ap pellant of h er right to review the record and file

a pro se response to counsel’s brief. In compliance with Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d
313 , 318

– 20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014), counsel provided Appellant with a form motion
to file in this court to obtain access to the reporter’s record and the clerk’s record.
W e conclude that Appellant’s counsel has satisfied his dut ies under Anders , Schulman , and Kelly

. We note that Appellant did not file in this court th e pro se motion for access to the appellate record . Nor did she file a pro se response to
counsel’s Anders brief. Following the procedures outlined in Anders and Schulman , we have independently reviewed the record, and we agree that the appeal is without merit and
should be dismissed. See Schulman , 252 S.W.3d at 409. However, in light of P.M. ,

we deny the motion to withdraw that was filed by Appellant’s court

- appointed
counsel. See P.M. , 2016 WL 1274748, at *3.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is denie d, and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Ju ly 28 , 2016
Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson, J. , and Bailey, J.
#### § 34.606 Recordkeeping—NOAA RESTORE Act Science Program.

Recipients and other entities receiving funds under the NOAA RESTORE Act Science Program must maintain records as prescribed by NOAA and make the records available to NOAA.
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.6014-1 Income tax return—tax not computed by taxpayer.

For provisions relating to the election not to show on an income tax return the amount of tax due in connection therewith, see §§ 1.6014-1 and 1.6014-2 of this chapter (Income Tax Regulations).

[T.D. 7102, 36 FR 5498, Mar. 24, 1971]
PUBLIC LAW 106–389—OCT. 29, 2000 114 STAT. 1551

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.J. Res. 119:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):

Oct. 29, considered and passed House and Senate.

Æ

Public Law 106–389

106th Congress

Joint Resolution

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and for other

purposes.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law

106–275, is further amended by striking the date specified in section

106(c) and inserting ‘‘October 30, 2000’’.

Approved October 29, 2000.

Ante, pp. 810,

866, 1073, 1318,

1397, 1398, 1450,

1550.

Oct. 29, 2000

[H.J. Res. 119]
Searched for **http://www.fcc.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.fcc.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
ATLANTIC OCEAN

UNITED STATES

BEAUFORT

BATHYMETRIC FISHING MAP

SOUTH CAROLINA

3
;

;
:
5

(sapere

i
|
c
i

pee was
a

Aercae EDL, Ranymeny rometed Soe WO byang meme
seins Weert fiom fem aw te ate of arene He

pomnr vende trgraenae Saat

(Tn MEANY Or LCror WATER

‘teat ee n00
—o

+

FOR_NAVIGATION|

OT TO BE USED

ae

Makara weeD scat

sheers

|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT 99.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Winton Financial Corporation (the
"Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this Certification (the
"Report"), I, Jill M. Burke, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          1.   The Report  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
               15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the Company.



                                          /s/Jill M. Burke
                                          -----------------------------
                                          Jill M. Burke
                                          Chief Financial Officer

                                          Date:  August 14, 2002
#### § 34.705 Ineligible activities—Centers of Excellence Research Grants Program.

Any activity that is not authorized under the provisions of § 34.704 is ineligible for funding under this subpart.
EXHIBIT
32.1
  CERTIFICATION
OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Protein Polymer
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 /s/ JAMES
B. MCCARTHY
 
 James B.
McCarthy
 Interim
Chief Executive Officer
 Date:
August 19, 2009
www.gpo.gov

### §118. Payments in satisfaction of judgments

Payments to Indians made from moneys appropriated by Congress in satisfaction of the judgment of any court shall be made under the direction of the officers of the Interior Department charged by law with the supervision of Indian affairs, and all such payments shall be accounted for to the Treasury in conformity with law.

(Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 210, §28, 36 Stat. 1077.)

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

Transfer of disbursement functions of all Government agencies with certain exceptions to the Fiscal Service, Department of the Treasury, see note set out under section 53 of this title.

#### Cross References

Public accounts to be settled in General Accounting Office, see section 3526 of Title 31, Money and Finance.

#### Section Referred to in Other Sections

This section is referred to in section 86 of this title.
DISMISS and Opinion Filed April 18, 2013

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-12-01682-CV

MARY L. CATHCART, Appellant

V.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-12-00007-E

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Lang-Miers and Lewis 

Opinion by Chief Justice Wright

Before the Court is appellee’s March 27, 2013 motion to dismiss. Appellee contends the 

appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Appellant did not file a response to the 

motion.

By letter dated February 12, 2013, the Court informed appellant that her brief was past 

due. We instructed appellant to file her brief along with an extension motion within ten days. 

We cautioned appellant that failure to file her brief with an extension motion within the time 

specified would result in dismissal of her appeal without further notice. As of today’s date, 

appellant has not filed a brief. Accordingly, we grant appellee’s motion and dismiss the appeal. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1) & 42.3(c). 

121682F.P05

/Carolyn Wright/

CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
1201682.R.docx –2–

Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

MARY L. CATHCART, Appellant

No. 05-12-01682-CV V.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law 

No. 5, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-12-00007-E.

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. 

Justices Lang-Miers and Lewis, 

participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee, WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., recover its costs of this 

appeal from appellant, MARY L. CATHCART.

Judgment entered April 18, 2013.

/Carolyn Wright/

CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
Jump to In This Section

      - Home
      - Under Secretary for Management
      - Bureau of Information Resource Management

## Accessibility at the Department

Share

## 	Welcome to IMPACT

The Department of State IRM Program for Accessible Computer/Communication Technology (IMPACT) serves as the Department's resource for achieving program, technology, and information accessibility for all employees, customers, and general public. This includes providing assistance to all bureaus in their implementation of Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act as legislatively mandated.

## 	Section 508

The Section 508 statute, PDF, requires that Federal agencies' Electronic and Information Technology (E&IT) is accessible to people with disabilities, including employees and members of the public.

Section 508 establishes requirements for any Electronic and Information Technology developed, maintained, procured, or used by the federal government. The term "Electronic and Information Technology" has been defined by the US Access Board, that is consistent with section 5002(3) of the Clinger-Cohen Act of 1996 (40 U.S.C. 1401(3)), in regulations published December 21, 2001, CFR 36 Part 1194, under the subparagraph 'Definitions". The Access Board, also, established the criteria to meet the requirements of paragraph 1 on the Workforce Investment Act, Section 508, Electronic and Information Technology.

For More Information:
            -  Section 508 Final Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Rule
            -  Guide to Standards

Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

If you require additional assistance, please contact IMPACT at SECTION508@state.gov.

### In This Section:

            -  Accessibility Events and News 
            -  Accessible ICT How-To Resources 
            -  U.S. Disability Legislation 
            -  Section 508 and Procurement 
            -  Federal IT Accessibility Initiative 
            -  The U.S. Access Board 
            -  Computer/Electronic Accommodations Program (CAP) 

### Highlights

### Learn More
EX-4.42 Addendum No. 1/ Norwegian Pearl



 





Exhibit 4.42




DELIVERY DATE ADDENDUM



Addendum
to the Contract (as amended and supplemented from time to time, the “Contract”) dated
as of 24 December 2004 and made between Jos. L. Meyer GmbH, Norwegian Pearl, Ltd. (formerly known
as Hull 669 Ltd.) and NCL Corporation Ltd. in respect of the construction of Hull No. S .669,




It is hereby agreed as follows:





	1.	 	The date specified in the first line of Clause 1.1 of Article 7 of the Contract is hereby
amended to read 28 November 2006.
	 
	2.	 	The date specified in the last line of Clause 2.1 (i) of Article 9 of the Contract is hereby
amended to read 28 November 2006.





Authorised Signatures




Signed by:
/s/ Jos. L. Meyer

for and on behalf of

Jos. L. Meyer GmbH on 14th February 2006




Signed by:
/s/ Colin Veitch

for and on behalf of

Norwegian Pearl, Ltd. on 13th February 2006




Signed by:
/s/ Colin Veitch

for and on behalf of

NCL Corporation Ltd. on 13th February 2006




End of Addendum.
§ 1010.331 Reports relating to currency in excess of $10,000 received as bail by court clerks. ( a ) *Reporting requirement* — ( 1 ) *In general.* Any clerk of a Federal or State court who receives more than $10,000 in currency as bail for any individual charged with a specified criminal offense must make a report of information with respect to that receipt of currency. For purposes of this section, a clerk is the clerk's office or the office, department, division, branch, or unit of the court that is authorized to receive bail. If someone other than a clerk receives bail on behalf of a clerk, the clerk is treated as receiving the bail for purposes of this paragraph (a).
( 2 ) *Certain financial transactions.* Section 6050I of title 26 of the United States Code requires clerks to report information about financial transactions to the IRS, and 31 U.S.C. 5331 require clerks to report the same information to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. This information shall be reported on the same form as prescribed by the Secretary.
( b ) *Meaning of terms.* The following definitions apply for purposes of this section— ( 1 ) The term *currency* means— ( i ) The coin and currency of the United States, or of any other country, that circulate in and are customarily used and accepted as money in the country in which issued; and
( ii ) A cashier's check (by whatever name called, including treasurer's check and bank check), bank draft, traveler's check, or money order having a face amount of not more than $ 10,000.
( 2 ) The term *specified criminal offense* means— ( i ) A Federal criminal offense involving a controlled substance (as defined in section 802 of title 21 of the United States Code), provided the offense is described in Part D of Subchapter I or Subchapter II of title 21 of the United States Code;
( ii ) Racketeering (as defined in section 1951, 1952, or 1955 of title 18 of the United States Code);
( iii ) Money laundering (as defined in section 1956 or 1957 of title 18 of the United States Code); and
( iv ) Any State criminal offense substantially similar to an offense described in this paragraph (b)(2) of this section.
( c ) *Time, form, and manner of reporting.* — ( 1 ) *In general.* The reports required by paragraph (a) of this section must be made by filing a Form 8300, as specified in 26 CFR 1.6050I-2(c)(2). The report must be filed at the time and in the manner specified in 26 CFR 1.6050I-2(c)(1) and (3), respectively.
( 2 ) *Verification of identity.* A clerk required to make a report under this section must, in accordance with 26 CFR 1.6050I-2(c)(3)(ii), verify the identity of each payor of bail listed in the report.
[77 FR 33637, June 7, 2012]
IB

Private Calendar No. 3

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1315

[Report No. 104–360]

For the relief of Kris Murty.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 23, 1995

Mr. COLEMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

NOVEMBER 28, 1995

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House and ordered to be printed

A BILL

For the relief of Kris Murty.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RELOCATION EXPENSES FOR KRIS MURTY.

4 For the purpose of receiving reimbursement for relo5 cation expenses under sections 5724 and 5724a of title

6 5, United States Code, Kris Murty of El Paso, Texas, an

7 employee of the Department of the Army, is deemed to

8 have been an employee transferred by the Department of
2

HR 1315 RH

1 the Army from one official station to another for perma2 nent duty when he relocated from Houston, Texas, to Fort

3 Bliss, Texas, in February 1985.

4 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON AGENTS AND ATTORNEYS FEES.

5 No amount exceeding 10 percent of a payment made

6 pursuant to section 1 may be paid to or received by any

7 agent or attorney in consideration for services rendered

8 in connection with the payment. Any person who violates

9 the provisions of this section shall be guilty of an infrac10 tion and shall be subject to a fine in the amount provided

11 under title 18, United States Code.

Private Calendar No. 

3

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1315

[Report No. 104–360]

A BILL

For the relief of Kris Murty.

NOVEMBER 28, 1995

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House and

ordered to be printed
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 323.5 Fees. The fees provided in part 1 of title 31 of the CFR (32 FR 9562, July 1, 1967), shall apply to all requests for identifiable records under this part except as follows: ( a ) No charge will be made for verifying the record of a savings bond or note identified by series and denomination and either the registration and issue date or the serial number at the request of the owner, coowner, or surviving beneficiary or person entitled to the security under the applicable regulations.
( b ) No charge will be made for verifying the record of a registered Treasury security, other than a savings bond or note, or a registered security of a Government agency or a wholly or partially Government-owned corporation, identified as to loan and registration for an owner, joint owner or person entitled to the security under the applicable regulations.
( c ) No charge will be made for advising a person who has submitted satisfactory evidence of ownership as to the status of a bearer Treasury security or a bearer security of a Government agency or a wholly or partially Government-owned corporation.
( d ) No charge will be made for furnishing an owner, coowner, joint owner, surviving beneficiary, or person who is entitled to the security under the applicable regulations a photocopy or similar reproduction of any Treasury security, with any necessary supporting documents, which it is alleged was improperly paid or was reissued, transferred or redeemed on a forged or defective request, endorsement, or assignment.
( e ) Fees may be waived for other classes of requested records upon a finding by the Commissioner of the Fiscal Service that the person requesting the information is entitled to the record requested without charge.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-50914

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROBERTO BARRIOS-MARQUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. P-95-CV-27

- - - - - - - - - -

September 18, 1996

Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Roberto Barrios-Marquez, # 64496-080, appeals the district

court’s denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his

sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Barrios-Marquez argues

that the district court erred because he was denied effective

assistance of counsel and because his fourth amendment rights

were violated. Barrios-Marquez contends that he was entitled to

an evidentiary hearing on his § 2255 motion. We have reviewed
No. 95-50914

- 2 -

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States

v. Barrios-Marquez, No. P-95-CA-27 (W.D. Tx. Nov. 29, 1995). 

Barrios-Marquez was not entitled to an evidentiary hearing on the

asserted issues. See United States v. Briggs, 939 F.2d 222,

228-29 (5th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1067 (1993). The

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

AFFIRMED.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2016, byand among GS MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORPORATION II, as Depositor, WELLS FARGOBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, ADIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION , as General Special Servicer, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as AMA Plaza Special Servicer, AEGON USAREALTY ADVISORS, LLC, as 225 Bush Street Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Trustee and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as OperatingAdvisor and as Asset Representations Reviewer with respect to CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2016-GS4 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Marthinsen, Managing Director of Special Servicing dohereby certify that:

 

1.            A review of the activities of the AMA Plaza Special Servicer during the periodfrom November 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the “ReportingPeriod”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period hasbeen made under my supervision, and 

 

2.            To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the AMA Plaza SpecialServicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in allmaterial respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day ofFebruary 2017.

 

/s/ Daniel Marthinsen

Daniel Marthinsen

Managing Director

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|