alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CI2020138EN.01000101.xml

| 28.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 138/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 138/1

---

Statement of the Commission relating to Regulation (EU) 2020/560 of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) No 508/2014 and (EU) No 1379/2013 as regards specific measures to mitigate the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak in the fishery and aquaculture sector

(2020/C 138 I/01)

The Commission welcomes the swift adoption by the European Parliament and the Council of its proposal to modify the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund to mitigate the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak and help our fishermen and women and aquaculture producers.

The Commission wishes to underline that fisheries control and the collection of scientific data are of great importance for the sustainable management of fish stocks on the basis of the best available scientific advice and reliable enforcement. The reduction of financial resources thereto should not lead to deterioration of the outcome of these essential elements of the Common Fisheries Policy.

The Commission wishes to stress that its proposal, as well as the amendments made to it, address the unique crisis situation caused by the COVID-19 outbreak and the exceptional and immediate need for support to address the consequences of that outbreak. They cannot prejudge the future Regulation on the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund.

---
§ 49.4253-2 Exemption for news services. ( a ) *In general.* The exemption for news services provided by section 4253(b) is applicable to payments for services of the kind listed in section 4251, except general telephone service. The exemption will apply only with respect to payments for services which are utilized exclusively: ( 1 ) In the collection of news for the public press or radio or television broadcasting or in the dissemination of news through the public press or by means of radio or television broadcasting; or
( 2 ) In the collection or dissemination of news by a news ticker service furnishing a general news service similar to that of the public press. For the exemption to apply, the charge for the services must be billed in writing to the person paying for the services and such person must certify in writing that the services are so utilized.
( b ) *Scope of the exemption.* ( 1 ) The exemption applies to amounts charged for messages from any newspaper, press association, radio or television news broadcasting agency, or news ticker service, to any other newspaper, press association, radio or television news broadcasting agency, or news ticker service or to or from their bona fide correspondents, which messages deal exclusively with the collection of news items for, or the dissemination of news items through, the public press, radio or television broadcasting, or a news ticker service furnishing a general news service similar to that of the public press. The exemption does not extend to messages of an administrative nature such as messages transmitting funds to correspondents, messages to correspondents relating to assignments or hotel accommodations, etc.
( 2 ) The exemption does not extend to the collection and dissemination of information or matters for publication in magazines, periodicals, and trade and scientific publications issued to supply information on certain subjects of interest to particular groups; or to amounts paid by newspapers, press associations, radio or television news broadcasting agencies or networks, or news ticker services, for general telephone service taxable under section 4251.
#### § 21.405 Penalty procedures.

Agencies shall impose and collect civil penalties pursuant to the provisions of the Program Fraud and Civil Remedies Act, 31 U.S.C. sections 3803 (except subsection (c)), 3804, 3805, 3806, 3807, 3808, and 3812, insofar as these provisions are not inconsistent with the requirements herein.
HomeLocal Guard Force...Ahmad Firooz Azizy

# 									Ahmad Firooz Azizy							

DS Memorial

September 13, 2013

		Diplomatic Security Memorial		

**Local Guard Force****Year of Death: 2013**

Ahmad Firooz Azizy (Firooz Aziz), Local Guard Force, died on September 13, 2013, in Herat, Afghanistan. He was killed in an attack on U.S. Consulate Herat.

**Photo: U.S. Government image**

Tags

AfghanistanDS Local Guard Force

Back to Top
800 Independence Ave., S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

January 20, 2011 

Mr. William P. Rourke 

1200 Hwy 74 South, Suite 6 

Peachtree City, GA 30269 

Dear Mr. Rourke: 

This letter is in response to your April 21, 2009 petition for rulemaking to establish a new 

special airworthiness primary category, called “owner-maintenance” airworthiness 

category. You are petitioning to allow the pilot/owner or a hired certified mechanic to 

perform work on the airplane. In addition, you propose to allow a licensed mechanic or 

the pilot/owner to be able to sign the maintenance release form to return the airplane to 

service. 

We use the following criteria to determine which petitions for rulemaking are of 

sufficient priority to initiate a rulemaking action: 

1) the immediacy of the safety concerns the petition raises; 

2) the priority of other Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) rulemaking issues; 

and 

3) the resources we have available to address these issues. 

Based on the criteria above, we have reviewed your petition and determined that you 

have not raised a safety concern and our limited rulemaking resources are being applied 

to critical safety regulations, some of which were recently mandated by Congress through 

legislation. 

Your petition for rulemaking relates to certification standards found in Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 21 and maintenance regulations found in 14 CFR part 

43. As proposed in your petition, a new category of aircraft that includes maintenance 

requirements would essentially interrupt the structure and distinction that currently exists 

between certification and operating regulations. In addition, we believe that existing 

certification standards (14 CFR part 21) address the issuance of special airworthiness 

certificates for new, imported, standard, and other aircraft, and further rulemaking on this 

subject is not warranted. 
2

Our maintenance regulations (14 CFR part 43) and more specifically § 43.3, concerns 

persons authorized to perform maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, and 

alterations on aircraft. Section 43.3(g) sets forth provisions for pilots performing 

preventive maintenance; while paragraph (f) provides for persons authorized to approve 

aircraft for return to service after preventive maintenance has been performed under 

paragraph (g). The amendment you request would allow individuals other than 

certificated mechanics to perform maintenance in flight critical areas of the aircraft and to 

sign a maintenance release form to return the aircraft to service. The FAA has 

determined that these actions would not be in the public interest and would not enhance 

safety -- two important areas that must be substantiated before the FAA could undertake 

rulemaking. 

In consideration of the foregoing and pursuant to the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 

§§ 40113 and 33701, delegated to me by the Administrator, your petition for rulemaking 

is hereby denied. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Raymond Towles 

Acting Director, Flight Standards Service
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Stephen M. Dyott, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ACG Holdings, Inc. and AmericanColor Graphics, Inc., (collectively the “Company”);
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and
c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date: February 14, 2005           /s/ Stephen M. Dyott        Stephen M. Dyott        Chief Executive Officer  
43
#### § 28.305 Preference in admission.

A recipient to which §§ 28.300 through 28.310 apply shall not give preference to applicants for admission, on the basis of attendance at any educational institution or other school or entity that admits as students only or predominantly members of one sex, if the giving of such preference has the effect of discriminating on the basis of sex in violation of §§ 28.300 through 28.310.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Managed Pension Assets Partnerhsip 1989-2, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of
operations  contained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended March 31, 1999 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         1,000
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  25,393
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               26,393
<PP&E>                                         1,424,360
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,290,887)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 159,866
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,098
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     155,768
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   159,866
<SALES>                                        6,493
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6,598
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5,091<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,598)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,598)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,598)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
www.gpo.gov

### §2718. Authorization of appropriations

(a) Subject to section 2717 of this title, there are authorized to be appropriated, for fiscal year 1998, and for each fiscal year thereafter, an amount equal to the amount of funds derived from the assessments authorized by section 2717(a) of this title.

(b) Notwithstanding section 2717 of this title, there are authorized to be appropriated to fund the operation of the Commission, $2,000,000 for fiscal year 1998, and $2,000,000 for each fiscal year thereafter. The amounts authorized to be appropriated in the preceding sentence shall be in addition to the amounts authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a) of this section.

(Pub. L. 100–497, §19, Oct. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 2485; Pub. L. 102–238, §2(b), Dec. 17, 1991, 105 Stat. 1908; Pub. L. 105–83, title I, §123(b), Nov. 14, 1997, 111 Stat. 1566; Pub. L. 105–119, title VI, §627, Nov. 26, 1997, 111 Stat. 2522.)

#### Amendments

1997—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 105–119 amended subsec. (a) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (a) read as follows: “Subject to the provisions of section 2717 of this title, there are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 1998, and for each fiscal year thereafter, an amount equal to the amount of funds derived from the assessments authorized by section 2717(a) of this title for the fiscal year immediately preceding the fiscal year involved, for the operation of the Commission.”

Pub. L. 105–83, §123(b)(1), substituted “for fiscal year 1998, and for each fiscal year thereafter, an amount equal to the amount of funds derived from the assessments authorized by section 2717(a) of this title for the fiscal year immediately preceding the fiscal year involved,” for “such sums as may be necessary”.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 105–83, §123(b)(2), added subsec. (b) and struck out former subsec. (b) which read as follows: “Notwithstanding the provisions of section 2717 of this title, there are hereby authorized to be appropriated not to exceed $2,000,000 to fund the operation of the Commission for each of the fiscal years beginning October 1, 1988, and October 1, 1989. Notwithstanding the provisions of section 2717 of this title, there are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to fund the operation of the Commission for each of the fiscal years beginning October 1, 1991, and October 1, 1992.”

1991—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 102–238 inserted at end “Notwithstanding the provisions of section 2717 of this title, there are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to fund the operation of the Commission for each of the fiscal years beginning October 1, 1991, and October 1, 1992.”

#### Section Referred to in Other Sections

This section is referred to in section 2717 of this title.
1 | Building Technologies Program eere.energy.gov

Example: Cost-Efficiency data and

CSLs for DL7 (75 kVA, 1-phase)

$500 

$1,500 

$2,500 

$3,500 

$4,500 

$5,500 

$6,500 

$7,500 

$8,500 

$9,500 

97.80% 98.00% 98.20% 98.40% 98.60% 98.80% 99.00% 99.20% 99.40% 99.60%

Manufacturer Selling Price ($)

Efficiency at 35% Load, Temperature Corrected

M12_AlAl_bl_3leg

M12_CuAl_bl_3leg

M6_AlAl_bl_3leg

M6_AlAl_fm_3leg

M4_CuAl_fm_3leg

M3_AlAl_fm_3leg

M3_AlAl_slm_3leg

M3_AlAl_dgw_3leg

H0_AlAl_fm_3leg

H0_AlAl_slm_3leg

ZDMH_AlAl_dgw_3leg

H0_CuCu_fm_3leg

SA1_AlAl_dgw_5leg

SA1_CuCu_dgw_5leg

CSLs

CSL 0 CSL 1 CSL 2 CSL 3

NEMA Pr.

CSL 4 CSL 5 CSL 6 CSL 7
2 | Building Technologies Program eere.energy.gov

• National impacts depend on the choice of TSL

– Energy savings

– Net present economic value

– Emissions and social cost of carbon

– Manufacturer impacts

– Demand for new materials

• Certain TSLs are analyzed for most rule-making processes

– “Max Tech” required by law

– Maximum NPV (typically the minimum LCC)

– Maximum energy savings with non-negative LCC

• Additional TSLs are defined as appropriate

– Technology break-points

– Fill in gaps in the design space

Analysis Results for draft TSLs
3 | Building Technologies Program eere.energy.gov

• TSLs so far –

– MAX TECH, (COMPLETE)

– MAX NET PRESENT VALUE, (COMPLETE)

– MAXIMUM ENERGY SAVINGS WITH POSITIVE LIFE CYCLE 

COST, BASELINE (no standard standard), (COMPLETE)

– HIGHEST ENERGY SAVINGS WITH MULTIPLE CORE 

MATERIAL SUPPLIERS,

– HIGHEST ENERGY SAVINGS WITH MULTIPLE COMPETITIVE 

CORE MATERIAL SUPPLIERS, 

– SOME ASPECT OF ANNUAL ELECTRICITY BILL SAVINGS 

(eg, 30% OR 50%),

– GAP FILL AS NECESSARY.

Potential TSLs
40080.

#### GENTRY v. GEORGIA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY et al.

Decided May 2, 1963

Rehearing denied May 20, 1963, and June 12, 1963.

*889*Wade H. Leonard,*for plaintiff in error.

*Wilson, Branch, Barwick & Vandiver, M. Cook Barwick, Thomas S. Bentley,*contra.

Felton, Chief Judge.

1. The effect of the award in this case is to award compensation at 15% loss of use of an arm beginning as of the date of the injury, with credit allowed for all weeks already paid. There is no authority of law for such a retroactive award on a hearing for change in condition. With reference to an award of compensation or an approved agreement this court has repeatedly held that such award or agreement is res judicata that the amount of the award or agreement is owed the employee until the award or agreement is changed in a manner prescribed by law. *Pacific Employers Ins. Co. v. Shoemake,*105 Ga. App. 432 (2) (124 SE2d 653) and cases cited; *Sanders v. American Mut. &c. Co.,*105 Ga. App. 472 (1) (124 SE2d 923) and cases *890cited. *The rule is the same whether general disability or injury to specific member alone is involved.*This court has not had occasion to rule on this specific question except in *Continental Cas. Co. v. Haynie,*51 Ga. App. 650 (181 SE 126), and *Travelers Ins. Co. v. Reid,*54 Ga. App. 13 (186 SE 887). In the *Reíd*case the court ruled that the judgment remanding the case was tíre law of the case. It is not the law generally. The Supreme Court has clearly and unequivocally settled the exact question in *Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Clay,*180 Ga. 294 (1) (178 SE 736), and *Continental Cas. Co. v. Haynie,*182 Ga. 608 (186 SE 683). A reading of these cases will leave no doubt on the subject. The board erred in not approving the payment of the agreed compensation until the duty to pay under the agreement was changed as provided by law to take effect as provided by law. It is not necessary to rule on some of the other contentions made. The evidence authorized the finding that the employee had improved so that he only had a 15% loss of use of his arm. While the award used the words “permanent partial disability” to the arm this expression is construed to mean permanent partial loss of use of the arm. The shoulder, as we construe the law, is not a part of the arm. The findings were authorized that the only trouble with the employee’s shoulder was temporaiy and was due to the immobility of the shoulder while the arm was in a cast and that there was no superadded compensable injury due to injury to the shoulder. The contention that the deputy director should have participated in the review by the board is without merit. There is no such provision of law.

The judgment is reversed with direction that the case be remanded to the board with direction that an award be made not inconsistent with this opinion.

*Judgment reversed with directions.*

*Eberhardt and Russell, J.J., concur.*
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Winton Financial Corporation (the
"Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this Certification (the
"Report"), I, Robert L. Bollin, the President of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          1.   The Report  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
               15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the Company.




                                            /s/Robert L. Bollin
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Robert L. Bollin
                                            President
                                            (Chief Executive Officer)

                                            Date:  February 14, 2003
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CertificationPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, we, the undersigned Chief ExecutiveOfficer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Community FirstBankshares, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify:

 

1)              That theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period endedSeptember 30, 2003 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2)              Thatinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  November 7, 2003 | /s/ Mark A.  Anderson                                 |   |
|------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                         | Mark A.  Anderson                                     |   |
|                         | President  and Chief Executive Officer                |
|                         |                                                  |
|                         |                                                  |
| Date: November  7, 2003      | /s/ Craig A.  Weiss                                   |   |
|                         | Craig A.  Weiss                                       |   |
|                         | Executive  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----