alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 28.135 Designation of responsible employee and adoption of grievance procedures. ( a ) *Designation of responsible employee.* Each recipient shall designate at least one employee to coordinate its efforts to comply with and carry out its responsibilities under these Title IX regulations, including any investigation of any complaint communicated to such recipient alleging its noncompliance with these Title IX regulations or alleging any actions that would be prohibited by these Title IX regulations. The recipient shall notify all its students and employees of the name, office address, and telephone number of the employee or employees appointed pursuant to this paragraph.
( b ) *Complaint procedure of recipient.* A recipient shall adopt and publish grievance procedures providing for prompt and equitable resolution of student and employee complaints alleging any action that would be prohibited by these Title IX regulations.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1051 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 234
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1051

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 14, 1995

            Received; read twice and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To provide for the extension of certain hydroelectric projects located 
                     in the State of West Virginia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the time period specified in 
section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 
otherwise apply to Federal Energy Regulatory Commission projects 
numbered 6901 and 
6902, the Commission shall, upon the request of the licensee for those 
projects, in accordance with the good faith, due diligence, and public 
interest requirements of that section, the Commission's procedures 
under that section, and the procedures specified in that section, 
extend the time period during which the licensee is required to 
commence construction of those projects so as to terminate on October 
3, 1999.
    (b) Applicability.--Subsection (a) shall take effect for the 
projects upon the expiration of the extension, issued by the Commission 
under section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806), of the 
period required for commencement of construction of the projects.
    (c) Reinstatement of Expired License.--If a license for a project 
described in subsection (a) has expired prior to the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Commission shall reinstate the license effective as of 
the date of its expiration and extend the time required for 
commencement of construction of the project until October 3, 1999.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 13, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 234

104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1051

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To provide for the extension of certain hydroelectric projects located 
                     in the State of West Virginia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 14, 1995

            Received; read twice and placed on the calendar
```
Exhibit 35.15  LOGO OFFICERS CERTIFICATE C-III Asset Management LLC The undersigned, Barry Davis, President of C-III Asset Management LLC (f/k/a Centerline Servicing LLC), the
Special Servicer under that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2016, relating to the Morgan Stanley Capital I Trust 2016-BNK2, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-BKN2(the
Pooling and Servicing Agreement), hereby certifies as follows:  1.
a review of the activities of the Special Servicer and of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement during the calendar year 2018 (the Reporting Period) has been made under the undersigneds supervision;  2.
to the best of the undersigneds knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer maintained an
effective internal control system relating to its servicing of the Mortgage Loans serviced by it and has fulfilled in all material respects its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement throughout the Reporting Period. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given them in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,as of the 1st day of March, 2019, I have hereunto signed my name.  /s/ Barry DavisBarry Davis, PresidentC-III Asset Management LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company
(Vinton County Common Pleas.)

#### D. A. MARTINDILL, as treasurer of Vinton county O., v. SARAH A. SANGER, et al., widow and heirs at law of Jacob Sanger, dec’d.

Where ministerial section number twenty-nine in. the Ohio Company’s Purchase was held under a lease for ninety-nine years, renewable forever, but subject to revaluation every fifteen, years, and against which taxes assessed upon the fee stood charged on the duplicate in the name of the widow and heirs at law of the lessee, in an action brought by the county treasurer against said widow and heirs at law to recover judgment for the taxes so assessed and subject said lands to the payment thereof,. Held:

1. That said lands are not subject to_ taxation and said assessment was unauthorized.

2. That section 2733, Revised Statutes, only *507imposes a tax on the lessee’s interest in the lands described therein, and it does not apply to a lease of such lands, although for a term of more than fourteen years, if by the stipulations of the lease the lands, as between the lessor and lessee, are subject to revaluation.

3. That if section 2733 was applicable to such case, the lands being subject to revaluation every fifteen years, the lessee’s interest is not regarded as of substantial value and there is nothing to tax.

(For full text of opinion see *ante*549.)
Exhibit
      32(a)








This
      Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise
      subject to the liability of that section. This Certification shall not be
      incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document
      pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in such
      filing.








Certification
      Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63


of
      Title
      18 of the United States Code








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of the Companies (as defined below) on
      Form
      10-Q (the “Reports”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael G. Morris,
      the chief executive officer of





AEP
      Generating Company





(the
      “Companies”), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i)
      the Reports fully comply with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the
      Reports fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and
      results of operations of the Companies.








/s/
      Michael G. Morris


Michael
      G. Morris


Chief
      Executive Officer








May
      4,
      2007








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      American Electric Power Company, Inc. and will be retained by American Electric
      Power Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or
      its staff upon request.
Exhibit 11.1
                                                                ------------


                    SLADE'S FERRY BANCORP. AND SUBSIDIARY
                      COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                                 (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                         Six Months Ended           Three Months Ended
                                                             June 30,                    June 30,
                                                     ------------------------    ---------------------
(Dollars in thousands, except for per share data)       2005          2004          2005          2004
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                                  <c>           <c>           <c>           <c>
Net income                                           $    1,948    $    1,210    $      848    $      625
                                                     ==========    ==========    ==========    ==========

Average shares outstanding                            4,094,939     4,028,706     4,112,969     4,044,758
                                                     ==========    ==========    ==========    ==========

Basic earnings per share                             $     0.48    $     0.30    $     0.21    $     0.15
                                                     ==========    ==========    ==========    ==========

Average shares outstanding                            4,094,939     4,028,706     4,112,969     4,044,758

Net effect dilutive stock options                        28,857        48,500        19,743        43,410
                                                     ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------

Adjusted shares outstanding                           4,123,796     4,077,206     4,132,712     4,088,168
                                                     ==========    ==========    ==========    ==========

Diluted earnings per share                           $     0.47    $     0.30    $     0.21    $     0.15
                                                     ==========    ==========    ==========    ==========
</TABLE>


<PAGE>  36
From:   Chuck French/RTP/USEPA/US   

   

To: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov>  

   

Cc: Amy Branning/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Paula VanLare/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Sharon

Nizich/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Steve Fruh/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

   

Date:   04/07/2010 03:34 PM   

   

Subject:   RE: Interagency comments under EO 12866 on the Gold Ore Processing

NESHAP Draft NPRM

Hi Heidi,

We added the percent costs to the slide to answer your question (shown below).See

attached.  I am also working on getting the information together on CEMs and hope

to send you that info soon.

Thanks.

Chuck

(See attached file: Gold Mines‐emissions‐reductions‐costs‐each‐affected

source.ppt)

   

From:   "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov>  

   

To: Chuck French/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA  

   

Cc: Steve Fruh/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Sharon Nizich/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Amy

Branning/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Paula VanLare/DC/USEPA/US@EPA  

   

Date:   04/07/2010 01:49 PM   

   

Subject:   RE: Interagency comments under EO 12866 on the Gold Ore Processing

NESHAP Draft NPRM

Thanks Chuck, this is a great breakout of emissions and potential reductions by

process group.  Is it possible to show what percentage of the cost is associated

with each process group?

I believe we also look forward to learning more about CEMs for Mercury in the US.

Thank you,

heidi
Affected Processes

Mercury emissions in 

year 2007, baseline for 

MACT rule (in lbs/yr)

Estimated Reduction

by MACT (lb/yr)

Ore Pre-treatment processes 3,383 2,150 

Carbon processes 1,537 1,397 

Non-carbon processes 139 125 Total 5,059 3,672 

Estimated Mercury Emissions and Emissio

Estimates of Costs and Cost Effective

Capital cost Total annualized cost Average c

$4.8 million $2.3 million/year $1

Estimated Percent of the Costs for each Affecte

Group % of totCarbon 60Non-carbon concentrate 8Ore pretreatment 32
#### § 1.9004-3 Statutes of limitation.

The period within which the assessment of any deficiency or the credit or refund of any overpayment attributable to the election may be made shall not expire sooner than one year after December 11, 1961. Thus, if assessment of a deficiency or credit or refund of an overpayment, whichever is applicable, is not prevented on September 26, 1961, the time for making assessment or credit or refund shall not expire for at least one year after December 11, 1961, notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary. Even though assessment of a deficiency is prevented on September 26, 1961, if commencement of a suit for recovery of a refund under section 7405 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 may be made on such date, then any deficiency resulting from the election may be assessed at any time within 1 year after December 11, 1961. If a taxpayer makes the election, he shall be deemed to have consented to the application of the provisions of the Act extending the time for assessing a deficiency attributable to the election. The Act does not shorten the periods of limitation otherwise applicable. An agreement may be entered into under section 6501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 and corresponding provisions of prior law to extend the period for assessment.

(75 Stat. 674; 26 U.S.C. 613 note)

[T.D. 6575, 26 FR 9632, Oct. 12, 1961]
Exhibit 32.1
                                                               ------------


             STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
             SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      The undersigned, Mary Lynn D. Lenz, is the President and Chief
Executive Officer of Slade's Ferry Bancorp. (the "Company"). This statement
is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2004 (the "Report").

By execution of this statement, I certify that:

A)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or
      78o(d)); and

B)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the
      Report.

      This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the
Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the
Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It
is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

Date:  November 10, 2004               /s/ Mary Lynn D. Lenz
       -----------------               -----------------------------
                                       Mary Lynn D. Lenz
                                       President and Chief Executive
Officer


<PAGE>
II

Calendar No. 236

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1335

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 14, 1995

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar

AN ACT

To provide for the extension of a hydroelectric project located

in the State of West Virginia.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the time period

5 specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16

6 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the Federal En7 ergy Regulatory Commission project numbered 7307, the
2

HR 1335 PCS

1 Commission shall, upon the request of the licensee for the

2 project, in accordance with the good faith, due diligence,

3 and public interest requirements of that section and the

4 Commission’s procedures under that section, extend the

5 time period during which the licensee is required to com6 mence construction of the project so as to terminate on

7 September 26, 1999.

8 (b) APPLICABILITY.—Subsection (a) shall take effect

9 for the project described in subsection (a) upon the expira10 tion of the extension, issued by the Commission under sec11 tion 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806), of the

12 period required for commencement of construction of the

13 project.

14 (c) REINSTATEMENT OF EXPIRED LICENSE.—If a li15 cense for the project described in subsection (a) has ex16 pired prior to the date of enactment of this Act, the Com17 mission shall reinstate the license effective as of the date

18 of its expiration and extend the time required for com19 mencement of construction of the project until September

20 26, 1999.

Passed the House of Representatives November 13,

1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.

Calendar No. 236

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1335

AN ACT

To provide for the extension of a hydroelectric

project located in the State of West Virginia.

NOVEMBER 14, 1995

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar
www.gpo.gov

### §1750b. Ratification

The United States approves, ratifies, and confirms the Settlement Agreement.

(Pub. L. 105–83, title VII, §704, Nov. 14, 1997, 111 Stat. 1625.)
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 96-31215 Summary Calendar

_____________________

KARAM BEDI, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus ANDRE GRONDIN, LEONARD A. RADLAUER, and CARLOS E. ZELEDON, Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(96-CV-2846-E)

_________________________________________________________________ September 5, 1997 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

K aram Bedi, p ro se , appeals from the district court’s
dismissal of his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

We affirm for essentially the reasons stated by the district court. Andre Grondin’s motion to dismiss, Bedi’s motion for hearing en banc, and Leonard A. Radlauer’s and Carlos E. Zeledon’s motion
for sanctions are DENIED

. AFFIRMED; MOTIONS DENIED
#### In the Matter of the Assignment of John L. Parker to Henry A. Marriotte for the Benefit of Creditors.

[Special Term.]

(Decided December 5th, 1878.)

Where, after an assignor for benefit of creditors has failed to file the required inventory of his estate, the assignee also neglects to file such inventory, and to give a bond, the assignee should not, on his own motion, be permitted to re-assign the assigned property to the assignor and be discharged. The proper course is to remove him and hold him to account for the assigned estate.

Application by an assignee under a general assignment for the benefit of creditors for his discharge.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*Miron Winslow,*for the application.

Van Hoesen, J.

On the first of November, 1878, Parker made an assignment to Marriotte, which was, on that day, duly filed in the office of the county clerk. It was the duty of Parker to make an inventory of his estate within twenty days thereafter, but if he failed to do so, the duty of making such inventory was then devolved by law upon Marriotte. Marriotte could have applied to this court for ara order compelling Parker to appear, and to disclose under oath all he knew concerning the assigned estate. Instead of doing his duty, Marriotte says that he thought he would wait until Parker provided sureties for his (Marriotte’s) bond as assignee, but as Parker fails to produce sureties for him, he asks to be discharged, and for leave of the court to re-assign the assigned estate to Parker. Marriotte evidently views the assignment as a matter in which only Parker and himself have an interest, and he does not see why Parker’s creditors should be consulted or be paid. Instead of granting Marriotte’s application for a discharge, and for leave to re-assign the property to Parker, the proper course is to remove him and to hold him to a strict *17accountability for the assigned estate. Any creditor of Parker may now apply to the court for Marriotte’s removal, for an accounting, and for the examination of Parker and his books. The application of Marriotte is denied.

Application denied.
§ 19.925 Conviction. *Conviction* means— ( a ) A judgment or any other determination of guilt of a criminal offense by any court of competent jurisdiction, whether entered upon a verdict or plea, including a plea of nolo contendere; or
( b ) Any other resolution that is the functional equivalent of a judgment, including probation before judgment and deferred prosecution. A disposition without the participation of the court is the functional equivalent of a judgment only if it includes an admission of guilt.
§ 19.400 May I enter into a transaction with an excluded or disqualified person? ( a ) You as an agency official may not enter into a covered transaction with an excluded person unless you obtain an exception under § 19.120.
( b ) You may not enter into any transaction with a person who is disqualified from that transaction, unless you obtain a waiver or exception under the statute, Executive order, or regulation that is the basis for the person's disqualification.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 156 (Friday, August 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41164-41165]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19552]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Foreign Claims Settlement Commission

[F.C.S.C. Meeting Notice No. 5-09]


Issuance of Proposed Decisions in Claims Against Albania and 
Libya

    The Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, pursuant to its 
regulations (45 CFR part 504) and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 
U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the scheduling of 
meetings for the transaction of Commission business and other matters 
specified, as follows:
    Date and Time: Thursday, August 20, 2009, at 11 a.m.
    Subject Matter: Issuance of Proposed Decisions in claims against 
Albania and Libya.

[[Page 41165]]

    Status: Open.
    All meetings are held at the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 
600 E Street, NW., Washington, DC. Requests for information, or advance 
notices of intention to observe an open meeting, may be directed to: 
Administrative Officer, Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 600 E 
Street, NW., Room 6002, Washington, DC 20579. Telephone: (202) 616-
6975.

Mauricio J. Tamargo,
Chairman.
[FR Doc. E9-19552 Filed 8-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-P