alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Meredith L. VANHOOSE, Plaintiff-Appellant, and David D. Ashworth; Dennis S. Sullivan; Gary Lee Basenback; Dennis P. Woodard; John E. Workman; Frankie Kuhn; Robert Crum, Plaintiffs, v. Dan FERGUSON, Administrator; Donald Stepp; Hercil Gartin, Defendants-Appellees, and Cabell County Jail; Dallan Fields, Defendants.

No. 02-6581.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 13, 2002.

Decided June 19, 2002.

Meredith L. Vanhoose, Appellant Pro Se. Theresa Marlene Kirk, Pullin, Knopf, Fowler & Flanagan, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Meredith Vanhoose appeals the district court’s judgment order granting summary judgment to Cabell County Jail and certain of its employees. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s memorandum order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Vanhoose v. Ferguson,*No. CA-00-200 (S.D.W.Va. Mar. 29, 2002). We also deny Vanhoose’s motion for appointment of counsel and/or attorney’s fees. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1143

To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to witness retaliation.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 7, 1995

Mr. FOX of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to

witness retaliation.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 1513 of title 18, United States Code, is

4 amended by adding at the end the following:

5 ‘‘(c) If the retaliation occurred because of attendance

6 at or testimony in a criminal case, the maximum term of

7 imprisonment which may be imposed for the offense under

8 this section shall be the higher of that otherwise provided

9 by law or the maximum term that could have been im10 posed for any offense charged in such case.’’.

Æ
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Accountability for War Crimes and Other Atrocities in Ukraine: Recent Reporting on Unjust Detentions and Disappearances in Kherson Oblast

# 									Accountability for War Crimes and Other Atrocities in Ukraine: Recent Reporting on Unjust Detentions and Disappearances in Kherson Oblast							

Media Note

Office of the Spokesperson

November 18, 2022

The Conflict Observatory, a program supported by the U.S. Department of State, released an independent report today that details numerous instances of unjust detentions and disappearances in Kherson, Ukraine, as they relate to Russia’s ongoing filtration operations.  Russia must halt these operations and withdraw its forces to end a needless war that it cannot and will not win – no matter how despicable and desperate its tactics.

Prepared by Conflict Observatory partner Yale Humanitarian Research Lab, the new report is available at ConflictObservatory.org.  It presents publicly available information about the experiences of more than 220 individuals who are victims, survivors, or witnesses to torture and other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment, including gender-based violence, at the hands of Russia and Russia-backed forces.  Survivors and witnesses identified at least five individuals who died, as a result of their mistreatment in detention.  The report also identifies 12 detention and checkpoint locations across Kherson oblast and Crimea, and notes a disproportionately high incidence of reported mistreatment of members of the Crimean Tatar community.

The Conflict Observatory is a program that independently compiles and documents evidence to support investigations of those responsible for abuses.  This report and others like it demonstrate and strengthen U.S. and international resolve to pursue accountability for war crimes and other atrocities in Ukraine.  The United States supports unified and coordinated action for all existing efforts to examine mounting evidence of atrocities in Ukraine, including the International Criminal Court, the UN Commission of Inquiry, the UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine, the expert missions established under the OSCE’s Moscow Mechanism, and the Joint Investigative Team coordinated through Eurojust.  Additionally, through the Atrocity Crimes Advisory Group, the United States is working closely with Ukraine and our partners to support Ukraine’s domestic war crimes investigations and prosecutions of perpetrators.

The United States remains unwavering in its support of the government and people of Ukraine as they defend their country and their freedom.  There is only one country waging this unprovoked, premeditated war of choice with willful disregard for human life: Russia.  The United States is committed to holding those responsible to account, no matter how long that takes.  The people of Ukraine demand and deserve justice.

Tags

Bureau of Conflict and Stabilization OperationsBureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and LaborBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsBureau of Population, Refugees, and MigrationOffice of Global Criminal JusticeOffice of the SpokespersonUkraine

Back to Top
#### § 1022.530 [Reserved]
**Exhibit 35.3**

OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE 

I, Karen Montbach, aManaging Director of Citibank, N.A. (the “Company”), hereby certify, with respect to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2016 (the “Agreement”), by and among Citigroup Commercial Mortgage SecuritiesInc., as depositor, Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association, as master servicer, CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as special servicer, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as operating advisor and asset representationsreviewer, Citibank, N.A., as certificate administrator (the “Certificate Administrator”), and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, the following: 

1.     A review of the Company’s activities as Certificate Administrator during the reporting period endingDecember 31, 2016 and its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision. 

2.    To the bestof my knowledge, based on such review, as of and for the reporting period ending December 31, 2016, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period. 

This statement is given by the undersigned as an authorized officer of the Company and not in the undersigned’s individual capacity. 

Date:    February 27, 2017 

 

CGCMT 2016-P6
|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                William N. Plamondon, III                                                                                      |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  William                N. Plamondon, III Principal                Financial Officer August                20, 2007     |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           5             
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         Feb-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            Feb-23-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              Aug-30-1997
<CASH>                                         11,943
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  99,124
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                    43,912
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              191,629
<PP&E>                                      1,305,490
<DEPRECIATION>                                682,379
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              1,041,567
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         158,407
<BONDS>                                       459,889
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          439
<OTHER-SE>                                    380,945
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                1,041,567
<SALES>                                        36,912
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              471,981
<CGS>                                          20,497
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 320,760
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             14,592
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                64,828
<INCOME-TAX>                                   25,283
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            39,545
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   39,545
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .94
        


</TABLE>
Home2004 Treaties and Agreements...African Union (04-906) – Defense Cooperation

# 									African Union (04-906) – Defense Cooperation							

TIAS

Office of Treaty Affairs

September 6, 2004

## 								Summary							

        - 

Defense:  Cooperation

Agreement effected by exchange of notes at Addis Ababa August 27 and September 6, 2004; entered into force September 6, 2004.
Download Agreement						 [243 KB]

Tags

DefenseTreaties and International Agreements

Back to Top
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane lunani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T SA N D EEP K A U R, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , Jr ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 10- 72432 A ge nc yN o. A 075- 247- 196 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r9, 2012 ** B efo re: R A W L IN S O N , M U R G U IA , an dW A T F O R D , C i rcu i tJu d g es. S andeep K aur, a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f I nd i a, pet i t i on s f or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order denyi ng her m ot i on t o reopen rem ov al pr oc e e di ngs . W e have j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f orabus e of 

# FI LED OC T 12 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 72432 2 d is c r e tio n th e B I A ’s d e n ia l o f am o tio n to r e o p e n . T

ou f i gh iv. Mukasey , 538 F . 3d 9 8 8 , 9 9 2 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 8 ) . We d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T he B IA di d n otabuse i t s di sc re t i on i n d enyi ng K aur’ s m ot i on t o reopen as un t i m el y w here the m ot i on w as fi l ed ov erse ven years af t erthe B IA ’ s f

i nalorder, se e 8 C . F . R . § 1003. 2( c ) ( 2) , and K aurf a i l e d t o pr e s e nts uf

f i c i e nte vi de nc e of c h an g e dc i r c u ms t an c e s i n I n d i at o qu a l i f yf o rth e r e g u l a t o rye x c e p t i o n t o th e t i me lim it f o rf ilin g m o tio n s to r e o p e n , se e 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( c ) ( 3 ) ( ii) ; see a l so T ouf i ghi , 5 3 8 F .3 da t 9 9 6 - 9 7 ( e v id e n c e o f c h an g e dc o n d itio n s m u s t b e m a te r ia l) . K aur ’ s c ont e nt i on tha tthe B I A i gnor e d e vi de nc e i s nots upport e d bythe r e c or d. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
September 2 0 , 2016

Exemption No. 15254B

Regulatory Docket No

. FAA

– 2015

– 6303

Mr. Anthony Longo

Bell Air LLC

11 Estes Street

Ipswich, MA 01938

Dear Mr. Longo :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition for an amendment. It explains

the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists any changes to the original conditions

and limitations.

By letter posted to the public docket on July 22, 2016 , you pe titioned the Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA) on behalf of Bell Air LLC (hereinafter petitioner or operator) for an

amendment to your current exemption . That exemption from §§ 61.23(a) and ( c ),

61.101(e)(4 ) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a) , 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1),

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows the petitioner to conduct UAS operations

. You

requested an amendment to change the company name f rom BirdsEye Cinematography to

Bell Air LLC

.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested amendment to the exemption would not set a

precedent, and any delay in acting on this pe tition would be detrimental to the petitioner

.

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 15254A

remains valid and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority contained2

in 49 U.S.C

. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, the operator is

granted an amendment to change the operator name

.

The operator shall add this amendment to its original exemption.

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of amendment, Bell Air LLC is hereafter referred to as the operator. All

conditions and limitations within Grant of Exemption No. 15254A remain in effect

.

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be

grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption.

T his exemption terminates on March 31, 2018 , unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/ s/

John S. Duncan

Di rector, Flight Standards Service
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Norman Scullark, Appellant.

[805 NYS2d 7]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce Allen, J.), rendered May 6, 2003, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of sexual abuse in the second degree and endangering the welfare of a child, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of six months to be served intermittently on weekends and three years’ probation, unanimously affirmed. The matter is remitted to Supreme Court, New York County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility *(see People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94 [1903]). The victim provided a highly reliable account of the incident.

*217Defendant’s challenge to a portion of the People’s expert’s testimony is without merit. The challenged testimony was elicited by defendant on cross-examination and, in any event, was properly received since it explained one of the bases upon which the expert formulated her opinion regarding the likelihood of physical findings in sexual abuse cases (see *People v Bennett,*79 NY2d 464, 473 [1992]).

By failing to include, in the record on appeal, minutes of proceedings concerning the People’s application for a limited closure of the courtroom, defendant has failed to provide an adequate record for review of his challenge to the court’s ruling excluding members of his family during the victim’s testimony (see *People v Olivo,*52 NY2d 309, 320 [1981]). The limited record provided by defendant reveals that the behavior of members of defendant’s family caused the victim to break down during defendant’s first trial, resulting in a mistrial. Based upon the testimony of the victim’s treating psychologist, that she would likely suffer another breakdown if forced to testify before members of defendant’s family, the court properly found that there was an overriding interest justifying the exclusion at issue (see *People v Ming Li,*91 NY2d 913, 917 [1998]; see *also People v Joseph,*59 NY2d 496 [1983]).

The challenged portions of the prosecutor’s summation remarks were responsive to the defense summation and constituted fair comment based upon the evidence (see *People v Overlee,*236 AD2d 133 [1997], *lv denied*91 NY2d 976 [1998]).

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

Defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P, Saxe, Ellerin, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.
Exhibit
      32(b)








This
      Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise
      subject to the liability of that section. This Certification shall not be
      incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document
      pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in such
      filing.








Certification
      Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63


of
      Title
      18 of the United States Code








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of the Companies (as defined below) on
      Form
      10-Q (the “Reports”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Holly Keller
      Koeppel, the chief financial officer of





AEP
      Generating Company





(the
      “Companies”), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i)
      the Reports fully comply with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the
      Reports fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and
      results of operations of the Companies.








/s/
      Holly Keller Koeppel


Holly
      Keller Koeppel


Chief
      Financial Officer








May
      4,
      2007








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      American Electric Power Company, Inc. and will be retained by American Electric
      Power Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or
      its staff upon request.
www.gpo.gov

### §4166. GAO audits

To the extent that the financial transactions of Indian tribes and recipients of grant amounts under this chapter relate to amounts provided under this chapter, such transactions may be audited by the Comptroller General of the United States under such rules and regulations as may be prescribed by the Comptroller General. The representatives of the General Accounting Office shall have access to all books, accounts, records, reports, files, and other papers, things, or property belonging to or in use by such tribes and recipients pertaining to such financial transactions and necessary to facilitate the audit.

(Pub. L. 104–330, title IV, §406, Oct. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 4041.)

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1997, except as otherwise expressly provided, see section 107 of Pub. L. 104–330, set out as a note under section 4101 of this title.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 281.9 General provisions. ( a ) Nothing contained in this part shall be construed as having the effect of superseding or amending the provisions of any regulations issued or approved by the Secretary pursuant to the Act of December 23, 1944, as amended (67 Stat. 61).
( b ) The Secretary may waive, withdraw, or amend at any time or from time to time any or all of the provisions of the regulations of this part.
( c ) Implementing regulations within the framework of this circular will be issued by the Fiscal Assistant Secretary of the Treasury. All communications pertaining to the administration of the provisions of this part shall be directed to the Fiscal Assistant Secretary.
##### 



Exhibit 10.2 CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
OF
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
JMAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Adopted in accordance with the provisions of
Section 242 of the General Corporation Law
of the State of Delaware   The undersigned, Joseph G. Martinez , Senior Vice President and Secretary
of JMAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a corporation existing under the laws of the State
of Delaware (hereinafter referred to as the Corporation), does hereby certify
as follows: FIRST: That at a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Corporation
resolutions were duly adopted setting forth a proposed amendment of the
Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, declaring said amendment to be
advisable and directing that the amendment be considered at the next annual
meeting of the stockholders. The resolution setting forth the proposed
amendment is as follows: RESOLVED: That Article FOURTH of the Certificate of Incorporation is
amended to read in its entirety as follows: The total number of shares of all classes of stock which
the Corporation shall have authority to issue is Eighty-Five
Million (85,000,000) shares, of which Eighty Million
(80,000,000) shares shall be Common Stock, par value $0.01
per share and Five Million (5,000,000) shares shall be
Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, issuable in one
or more series. SECOND: That thereafter, pursuant to resolution of its Board of Directors,
the amendment was considered at the next annual meeting of the stockholders and
the necessary number of shares as required by statute were voted in favor of
the amendment. THIRD: That such amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the
provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate of
Amendment to its Certificate of Incorporation to be executed on its behalf by
its Senior Vice President and Secretary this 12th day of November, 2004. /s/ JOSEPH G. MARTINEZJoseph G. Martinez, Senior Vice President
& Secretary