alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
www.gpo.gov

### §286e–1k. Capital stock increase

#### (a) Increase authorized

The United States Governor of the Bank is authorized—

(1) to vote for an increase of 620,000 shares in the authorized capital stock of the Bank; and

(2) to subscribe on behalf of the United States to 116,262 additional shares of the capital stock of the Bank, except that any subscription to such additional shares shall be effective only to such extent or in such amounts as are provided in advance in appropriations Acts.

#### (b) Authorization of appropriations

In order to pay for the increase in the United States subscription to the Bank provided for in this section, there are authorized to be appropriated, without fiscal year limitation, $14,025,266,370, for payment by the Secretary of the Treasury.

(July 31, 1945, ch. 339, §53, as added Pub. L. 100–461, title V, §555, Oct. 1, 1988, 102 Stat. 2268–36.)

#### Codification

Section 53 of act July 31, 1945, is based on section 1 of H.R. 4645, One Hundredth Congress, as reported Sept. 28, 1988, and enacted into law by Pub. L. 100–461.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1037 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1037

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include liability to pay 
    compensation under workmen's compensation acts within the rules 
          relating to certain personal liability assignments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 24, 1995

  Mr. Jacobs introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include liability to pay 
    compensation under workmen's compensation acts within the rules 
          relating to certain personal liability assignments.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ASSIGNMENT OF WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION LIABILITY ELIGIBLE FOR 
              EXCLUSION RELATING TO PERSONAL INJURY LIABILITY 
              ASSIGNMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (c) of section 130 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to certain personal injury liability 
assignments) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``, or as compensation under any workmen's 
        compensation act,'' after ``(whether by suit or agreement)'' in 
        the material preceding paragraph (1),
            (2) by inserting ``or the workmen's compensation claim,'' 
        after ``agreement,'' in paragraph (1), and
            (3) by striking ``section 104(a)(2)'' in paragraph (2)(D) 
        and inserting ``paragraph (1) or (2) of section 104(a)''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to claims under workmen's compensation acts filed after the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1202

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit interstate-connected

conduct relating to exotic animals.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 10, 1995

Mr. BROWN of California (for himself, Mr. GOSS, Mr. MEEHAN, Mr. YATES,

Mr. CLAY, Mr. BEILENSON, Mrs. MALONEY, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. JACOBS, Mr. MOORHEAD, Mr. STARK, Mr. NADLER, Mr. OWENS, Mr. LANTOS, Mrs. LOWEY, Mr. WILSON, Mr. TORRES, Mr. GEJDENSON, Mr.

SHAYS, Mr. PORTER, Ms. PELOSI, Mr. MILLER of California, Ms.

ESHOO, Mr. GALLEGLY, Mr. WAXMAN, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Mr.

DEFAZIO, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mr. MINETA, Mr. COYNE, Mr.

GUTIERREZ, and Mr. WELDON of Pennslyvania) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit interstateconnected conduct relating to exotic animals.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Captive Exotic Animal

5 Protection Act of 1995’’.
2

•HR 1202 IH

1 SEC. 2. TRANSPORT OR POSSESSION OF EXOTIC ANIMALS

2 FOR PURPOSES OF KILLING OR INJURING

3 THEM.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 3 of title 18, United

5 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the follow6 ing:

7 ‘‘§ 48. Exotic animals

8 ‘‘(a) Whoever, in or affecting interstate or foreign

9 commerce, knowingly transfers, transports, or possesses a

10 confined exotic animal, for the purposes of allowing the

11 killing or injuring of that animal for entertainment or the

12 collection of a trophy, shall be fined under this title or

13 imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

14 ‘‘(b) As used in this section—

15 ‘‘(1) the term ‘confined exotic animal’ means a

16 mammal of a species not historically indigenous to

17 the United States that in fact has been held in cap18 tivity for the shorter of—

19 ‘‘(A) the greater part of the animal’s life;

20 or

21 ‘‘(B) a period of one year;

22 whether or not the defendant knew the length of the

23 captivity; and

24 ‘‘(2) the term ‘captivity’ does not include any

25 period during which the animal—
3

•HR 1202 IH

1 ‘‘(A) lives as it would in the wild, surviving

2 primarily by foraging for naturally occurring

3 food, roaming at will over an open area of at

4 least 1,000 acres; and

5 ‘‘(B) has the opportunity to avoid hun6 ters.’’.

7 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

8 at the end of chapter 3 of title 18, United States Code,

9 is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

‘‘48. Exotic animals.’’.

Æ
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1218

To extend the authority of the Federal Communications Commission to use

competitive bidding in granting licenses and permits.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 13, 1995

Mr. BLILEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Commerce

A BILL

To extend the authority of the Federal Communications

Commission to use competitive bidding in granting licenses and permits.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.

4 Section 309(j)(11) of the Communications Act of

5 1934 (47 U.S.C. 309(j)(11)) is amended by striking ‘‘Sep6 tember 30, 1998’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2000’’.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 146 Introduced in House (IH)]

  2d Session
H. J. RES. 146

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1996, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 1996

Mr. Obey introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1996, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That section 106(c) of Public 
Law 104-56 is amended by striking ``December 15, 1995'' and inserting 
``May 31, 1996''.
                                 <all>
```
V

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1239

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade for the vessel DORDY III.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 14, 1995

Mr. ROHRABACHER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

DORDY III.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

4 Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the Act of June 19, 1886

5 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 12106 of title 46,

6 United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may

7 issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate en8 dorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the
2

•HR 1239 IH

1 vessel DORDY III (United States official number

2 286553).

Æ
# L_2019168EN.01001601.xml

| 25.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 168/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 168/16

---

Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/981 of 8 March 2019 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/35 supplementing Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 161 of 18 June 2019
  )

On page 33, Article 1(48):

for:

| ‘(48) | in Article 199, the following paragraphs 12 and 13 are added:

  “12.   Notwithstanding paragraphs 2 to 11, exposures referred to Article 192(3) shall be assigned a probability of default equal to 0,002 %.


  13.   Notwithstanding paragraphs 2 to 12, exposures referred to Article 192(3a) shall be assigned a probability of default equal to 0,001 %.”;’, |
| --- | --- |

‘(48)

“12.   Notwithstanding paragraphs 2 to 11, exposures referred to Article 192(3) shall be assigned a probability of default equal to 0,002 %.

13.   Notwithstanding paragraphs 2 to 12, exposures referred to Article 192(3a) shall be assigned a probability of default equal to 0,001 %.”;’,

read:

| ‘(48) | in Article 199, the following paragraphs 12 and 13 are added:

  “12.   Notwithstanding paragraphs 2 to 11, exposures referred to Article 192(3) shall be assigned a probability of default equal to 0,002 %.


  13.   Notwithstanding paragraphs 2 to 12, exposures referred to Article 192(3a) shall be assigned a probability of default equal to 0,01 %.”;’. |
| --- | --- |

‘(48)

“12.   Notwithstanding paragraphs 2 to 11, exposures referred to Article 192(3) shall be assigned a probability of default equal to 0,002 %.

13.   Notwithstanding paragraphs 2 to 12, exposures referred to Article 192(3a) shall be assigned a probability of default equal to 0,01 %.”;’.

---
§ 19.365 What must I do if I learn of information required under § 19.355 after entering into a covered transaction with a higher tier participant? At any time after you enter into a lower tier covered transaction with a person at a higher tier, you must provide immediate written notice to that person if you learn either that— ( a ) You failed to disclose information earlier, as required by § 19.355; or
( b ) Due to changed circumstances, you or any of the principals for the transaction now meet any of the criteria in § 19.355.
September 9, 2013

Mr. Craig Devenport

West Bend Air, Inc.

P.O. Box 409

West Bend, WI 53095

Dear Mr. Devenport:

This is in response to your July 11, 2013 letter sent to the public docket (No. FAA-2009-

0990) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration on behalf of West Bend Air, Inc. (WB 

Air) for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). 

That exemption, if granted, would allow WB Air to cover its safety-sensitive employees 

under one testing program.

On July 15, 2013, the FAA published the Combined Drug and Alcohol Testing Programs 

final rule (78 FR 41999) relating to air carrier operators and commuter or on-demand 

operators that also conduct commercial air tour operations to combine the drug and alcohol 

testing required for each operation into one testing program. A copy of this rule change is 

enclosed for your information.

If you have any questions, please contact the FAAs Drug Abatement Division at (202) 267-

8442 or drugabatement@faa.gov. Because the relief you seek is now covered under the new 

rule, we will take no further action on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/

Ida M. Klepper

Manager, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      15,201,292
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 68,086,191
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      17,736,079
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        17,944,595
<LOANS>                                    221,456,300
<ALLOWANCE>                                  3,727,341
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             336,703,127
<DEPOSITS>                                 298,983,848
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,314,641
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,830,944
<LONG-TERM>                                  4,451,548
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        34,583
<OTHER-SE>                                  30,087,563
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             336,703,127
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              4,768,939
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,193,818
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               104,039
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             6,066,796
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,607,655
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,700,945
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,365,851
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  150,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             291,566
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,423,463
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,407,981
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,407,981
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   872,442
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.43
<LOANS-NON>                                  2,997,563
<LOANS-PAST>                                   287,309
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             3,569,282
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    3,870
<RECOVERIES>                                    11,929
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            3,727,341
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         3,727,341
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Properties III L.P.
(the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 30, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, James Hussey, Chief Financial Officer of Richman Housing Credits Inc.,
general partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties III L.P., general partner of
the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.




/s/James HusseyJames
      HusseyChief
      Financial Officer of RichmanHousing
      Credits Inc., general partnerof
      Richman Tax Credit Properties IIIL.P.,
      General Partner of the RegistrantFebruary
      10, 2010
#### In the Matter of Maurice T., Appellant, v Mark P., Respondent, et al., Respondent.

[804 NYS2d 785]

In a paternity proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 5, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Silber, J.), dated February 2, 2005, which, without a hearing, dismissed the petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The subject child was born on January 14, 1999. The name of the respondent Mark E was listed on her birth certificate, and Mark E and the mother subsequently married and had another child together. Mark E, the mother, and the two girls lived together until his incarceration in 2002. Shortly thereafter, the mother became gravely ill and voluntarily placed the children in foster care due to her inability to care for them. Mark P. maintained contact with the subject child through visitation and, upon his release from prison, presented himself to the appropriate agency and began to plan for the children’s future. Early in 2004, the petitioner, Maurice T., met the subject child for the first time. At that time, Mark E informed the subject child that Maurice T., and not Mark E, might be her biological father. The child cried inconsolably. The mother died a few months later. Subsequently, Maurice T. commenced this paternity proceeding and requested DNA testing.

The Family Court properly dismissed the petition based on equitable estoppel. “The paramount concern in applying equitable estoppel in [paternity] cases has been, and continues to be, the best interests of the child” *(Jean Maby H. v Joseph H.,*246 AD2d 282, 285 [1998]; *see Matter of Kump v Basnight,*297 AD2d 639 [2002]; *Matter of Ettore I. v Angela D.,*127 AD2d 6, 14 [1987]). The Family Court was presented with sufficient evidence to make a determination as to the child’s best interests and, contrary to Maurice T.’s contention, it was within the Family Court’s discretion to do so without a hearing (see *Matter of Griffin v Marshall,*294 AD2d 438, 439 [2002]; *David L. v Cindy Pearl L.,*208 AD2d 502, 504 [1994]). Crane, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein and Lifson, JJ., concur.
www.gpo.gov

### §5341. Short title

This subchapter may be cited as the “Primary Dealers Act of 1988”.

(Pub. L. 100–418, title III, §3501, Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1386.)

#### References in Text

This subchapter, referred to in text, was in the original “this subtitle”, meaning subtitle F (§§3501, 3502) of title III of Pub. L. 100–418, which enacted this subchapter.
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

39–011 2014

113th Congress, 2d Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 113–115 

DEPLOYMENT OF U.S. MILITARY PERSONNEL TO 

CHAD 

COMMUNICATION 

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRANSMITTING

A LETTER INFORMING THE CONGRESS THAT APPROXIMATELY 80 

U.S. ARMED FORCES PERSONNEL WERE DEPLOYED TO CHAD AS 

PART OF THE U.S. EFFORTS TO LOCATE AND SUPPORT THE 

SAFE RETURN OF OVER 200 SCHOOLGIRLS WHO ARE REPORTED 

TO HAVE BEEN KIDNAPPED IN NIGERIA 

MAY 21, 2014.—Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs and ordered 

to be printed 


dlhill on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with HEARINGE:\Seals\Congress.#13

dlhill on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with HEARING
(1) 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, May 21, 2014. 

Hon. JOHN BOEHNER, 

Speaker of the House of Representatives, 

Washington, DC. 

DEAR MR. SPEAKER: Approximately 80 U.S. Armed Forces personnel have deployed to Chad as part of the U.S. efforts to locate 

and support the safe return of over 200 schoolgirls who are reported to have been kidnapped in Nigeria. These personnel will 

support the operation of intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance aircraft for missions over northern Nigeria and the surrounding area. The force will remain in Chad until its support in 

resolving the kidnapping situation is no longer required. 

This action has been directed in furtherance of U.S. national security and foreign policy interests, pursuant to my constitutional 

authority to conduct U.S. foreign relations and as Commander in 

Chief and Chief Executive. 

I am providing this report as part of my efforts to keep the Congress fully informed, consistent with the War Powers Resolution 

(Public Law 93–148). I appreciate the support of the Congress in 

these actions. 

Sincerely, 

BARACK OBAMA. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with HEARING
www.gpo.gov

### §784. Appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated the sum of $325,000 to remain available until expended, for necessary expenses incident to the distribution of funds authorized by sections 781 to 785 of this title.

(Aug. 1, 1955, ch. 444, §5, 69 Stat. 432; Pub. L. 86–229, Sept. 8, 1959, 73 Stat. 456.)

#### Amendments

1959—Pub. L. 86–229 increased appropriation authorization from $200,000 to $325,000.

#### Section Referred to in Other Sections

This section is referred to in sections 782, 783, 785 of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1196 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1196

To extend the deadline for the conversion of the vessel M/V TWIN DRILL.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 1995

  Mr. Fowler introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the deadline for the conversion of the vessel M/V TWIN DRILL.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR CONVERSION OF VESSEL M/V TWIN 
              DRILL.

    Section 601(d) of Public Law 103-206 (107 Stat. 2445) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (3), by striking ``1995'' and inserting 
        ``1996''; and
            (2) in paragraph (4) by striking ``12'' and inserting 
        ``24''.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by T.D. 9359, 72 FR 54544, Sept. 26, 2007.

§ 10.62 Contents of complaint. ( a ) *Charges.* A complaint must name the respondent, provide a clear and concise description of the facts and law that constitute the basis for the proceeding, and be signed by an authorized representative of the Internal Revenue Service under § 10.69(a)(1). A complaint is sufficient if it fairly informs the respondent of the charges brought so that the respondent is able to prepare a defense.
( b ) *Specification of sanction.* The complaint must specify the sanction sought against the practitioner or appraiser. If the sanction sought is a suspension, the duration of the suspension sought must be specified.
( c ) *Demand for answer.* The respondent must be notified in the complaint or in a separate paper attached to the complaint of the time for answering the complaint, which may not be less than 30 days from the date of service of the complaint, the name and address of the Administrative Law Judge with whom the answer must be filed, the name and address of the person representing the Internal Revenue Service to whom a copy of the answer must be served, and that a decision by default may be rendered against the respondent in the event an answer is not filed as required.
( d ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section is applicable beginning August 2, 2011.
[T.D. 9527, 76 FR 32309, June 3, 2011]