alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PROMISSORY NOTE


                                                                     Dated as of
$532,100                                                           April 1, 1998


          FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Phillip S. Magiera ("Maker"),
hereby promises to pay to the order of WorldPort Communications, Inc., a
Delaware corporation ("Payee"), its successors and assigns, the principal amount
of FIVE HUNDRED THIRTY-TWO THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($532,100).  Interest
shall accrue on the unpaid principal at a rate of nine percent (9%) per annum. 
The principal amount of this Note shall be paid in 23 monthly installments of
$22,170 each, with the first such payment being made on September 1, 1998 and
each subsequent payment being made on the first day of each month thereafter
plus a final payment of $22,190 which shall be made on August 1, 2000.  Accrued
and unpaid interest shall be paid with each principal payment.

          Payment for both principal and interest is to be made in lawful money
of the United States of America by bank draft or certified check.  This Note may
be prepaid in whole or in part at any time without premium or penalty.

          In addition to and not in limitation of the foregoing, Maker hereby
agrees, subject only to any limitation imposed by applicable law, to pay all
reasonable expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees and legal expenses,
incurred by the holder of this Note in endeavoring to collect any amounts
payable hereunder which are not paid when due.

          All parties hereto, whether as makers, endorsers, or otherwise,
severally waive presentment for payment, demand, protest, and notice of
dishonor.

          THIS NOTE IS MADE UNDER AND GOVERNED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
DELAWARE, WITHOUT REGARD TO CONFLICT OF LAWS PRINCIPLES.




                                   Phillip S. Magiera
Exhibit 11.0


                    SLADE'S FERRY BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
                      COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                                 (Unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                              Three months ended
                                                   March 31,
                                          -------------------------
                                              2003          2002
                                          -------------------------

                                          
            <c>
Net Income                                $ (692,180)    $  781,922
                                          -------------------------
Average shares outstanding                 3,948,584      3,879,855
                                          -------------------------
Basic earnings per share                  $    (0.18)    $     0.20
                                          -------------------------

Net Income                                $ (692,180)    $  781,922
                                          -------------------------
Average shares outstanding                 3,948,584      3,879,855
Net effect of dilutive stock options          26,213         33,714
                                          -------------------------
Adjusted shares outstanding                3,974,797      3,913,569
                                          -------------------------
Diluted earnings per share                $    (0.17)    $     0.20
                                          -------------------------

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                           MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                                       3,624
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                1,370
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   340
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 0
<PP&E>                                                      11,521
<DEPRECIATION>                                              11,305
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               9,961
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            0
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                                   9,332
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 9,961
<SALES>                                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               836
<CGS>                                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  453
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                383
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            383
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   383
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 1.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

                        CERTIFICATION OF VICE-PRESIDENT
                              BIRCH BRANCH, INC.
                     PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Birch Branch, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
George A. Powell, Vice President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ George A. Powell
George A. Powell
Vice-President, Secretary and Director
February 21, 2005
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 323.2 Rules governing availability of information. ( a ) *General.* The records of the Bureau of the Fiscal Service required by 5 U.S.C. 552 to be made available to the public shall be made available in accordance with the regulations on the Disclosure of Records of the Office of the Secretary issued under 5 U.S.C. 552 and published as part I of title 31 of the Code of Federal Regulations, 32 FR 9562, July 1, 1967, except as specifically provided in this part.
( b ) *Limitations on the availability of records relating to securities.* Records relating to the purchase, ownership of, and transactions in Treasury securities or other securities handled by the Bureau of the Fiscal Service for government agencies or wholly or partially Government-owned corporations will ordinarily be disclosed only to the owners of such securities, their executors, administrators or other legal representatives or to their survivors or to investigative and certain other agencies of the Federal and State governments, to trustees in bankruptcy, receivers of insolvents' estates or where a proper order has been entered requesting disclosure of information to Federal and State courts. These records are confidential because they relate to private financial affairs of the owners under this part. In addition, the information falls within the category of “personnel and medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy” under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(6). FOIA Exemption (b)(6) protects the privacy of living persons who own securities as well as the close survivors of deceased owners. Privacy interests, in the sense of the right to control, use, or disclose information about oneself, cease at death. However, the exemption protects the deceased person's family-related privacy interests that survive death where disclosure would cause embarrassment, pain, grief, or disrupt the peace of mind, of the surviving family. The Bureau of the Fiscal Service will determine, under FOIA exemption (b)(6), whether disclosure of the records is in the public interest by balancing the surviving family members' privacy interest against the public's right to know the information.
[32 FR 9967, July 7, 1967, as amended at 68 FR 67944, Dec. 5, 2003]
Source Categories

Emissions 

(tons/yr) %

Cumulative 

%

Agricultural Chemicals and Pesticides 1.75E-02 0.00 0.00

Chemical Preparations 1.58E+01 1.39 1.39

Chemicals and Allied Products Manufacturing 2.50E-01 0.02 1.41

Commercial Sterilization Facilities 4.24E+01 3.72 5.13

Cyclic Crude and Intermediate Production [1] 6.59E-01 0.06 5.18

Electronic Components, nec 4.85E-02 0.00 5.19

Hospital Sterilizers 9.97E+02 87.41 92.60

Hydrochloric Acid Production 1.11E-01 0.01 92.61

Industrial Gases Manufacturing 1.84E+00 0.16 92.77

Industrial Organic Chemicals Manufacturing 1.49E+01 1.31 94.08

Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing (MON) 1.21E+00 0.11 94.18

Pharmaceuticals Production 5.29E-01 0.05 94.23

Plastic Material and Resins Manufacturing [2] 2.50E-03 0.00 94.23

Polyether Polyols Production 1.82E+01 1.60 95.83

Prepared Feeds Manufacturing 2.65E+00 0.23 96.06

Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW) 1.12E+01 0.98 97.04

Refuse Systems 2.00E-02 0.00 97.04

Soap and Other Detergents Manufacturing 3.82E-01 0.03 97.07

Special Industry Machinery, nec 1.02E+01 0.90 97.97

Surface Active Agents Manufacturing 2.01E+01 1.76 99.73

Surgical and Medical Instruments Manufacturing 1.03E+00 0.09 99.82

Wet Corn Milling 2.01E+00 0.18 100.00

Total Emissions 1140.52 100.00

Foot Notes

[1] Cyclic Crude and Intermediate Production was titled Cyclic 

Crude and Intermediate Production (not subject to petroleum 

refining MACT) in the May 1999 Report

[2] Plastics Materials and Resins Manufacturing (Nov. 2002 

Inventory) was titled Polymers and Resins (I,II,IV) in the May 

1999 Report

Ethylene Oxide
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 205.17 Are funds transfers delayed by automated payment systems restrictions based on the size and timing of the drawdown request subject to this part?

Funds transfers delayed due to payment processes that automatically reject drawdown requests that fall outside a pre-determined set of parameters are subject to this part.
IV

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 71

Providing a sense of the Congress that the concurrent resolution on the

budget for fiscal year 1996 should reach a balanced Federal budget

by fiscal year 2001 through expenditure reductions and not tax increases.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 23, 1995

Mr. PICKETT submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on the Budget

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing a sense of the Congress that the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 1996 should reach

a balanced Federal budget by fiscal year 2001 through

expenditure reductions and not tax increases.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 1996

4 should reach a balanced Federal budget by fiscal year

5 2001 through expenditure reductions without tax in6 creases by providing that annual Federal budget deficits

7 may not exceed the following amounts:

8 (1) $175 billion in fiscal year 1996.
2

•HCON 71 IH

1 (2) $140 billion in fiscal year 1997.

2 (3) $105 billion in fiscal year 1998.

3 (4) $70 billion in fiscal year 1999.

4 (5) $35 billion in fiscal year 2000.

5 (6) $0 billion in fiscal year 2001.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

GREG FERGUSON; FERGUSON & 

ASSOCIATES, PA,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

RICHARD J. MAITA, Esq.; LISA N.

HOOPER; ALICE COPE; GOLDSTAR

MORTGAGE COMPANY, INCORPORATED;  No. 00-2242

TROY DILLS; FIRST GREENSBORO

HOME EQUITY INCORPORATED;

RIDGEVIEW MORTGAGE ASSOCIATES,

INCORPORATED; FIDELITY NATIONAL

TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW

YORK,

Defendants-Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville.

Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge.

(CA-99-225-1-T)

Submitted: May 22, 2001

Decided: July 25, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

COUNSEL

John N. Ellison, ANDERSON, KILL & OLICK, P.C., Philadelphia,

Pennsylvania, for Appellants. Robert B. Long, Jr., Phillip S. Ander-
son, LONG, PARKER, WARREN & JONES, P.A., Asheville, North

Carolina; James W. Williams, ROBERTS & STEVENS, P.A., Asheville, North Carolina; Ervin L. Ball, Jr., BALL, BARDEN & BELL,

P.A., Asheville, North Carolina; David W. Cartner, CARTNER &

CARTNER, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellees. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c). 

OPINION

PER CURIAM: 

Greg Ferguson and Ferguson & Associates, P.A. ("Appellants"),

appeal the district court’s order, which accepted in part and rejected

in part the magistrate judge’s recommendation, granting Defendants/Appellees’ motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), and dismissing Appellants’ claims alleging violations of the Racketeer

Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 1962(c), (d)

(West 2000), and the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1125(a) (West 1998

& Supp. 2000). The district court declined to exercise supplemental

jurisdiction over Appellants’ state law claims and denied Appellants’

motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. We have previously granted the motion to submit the case for a decision on the

briefs, without oral argument. 

This court reviews de novo the district court’s order granting a

Rule 12(b)(6) motion and reviews for an abuse of discretion the

court’s denial of a motion to amend the complaint. GE Inv. Private

Placement Partners II v. Parker, ___ F.3d ___, 2001 WL 392413, at

*2-*3 (4th Cir. Apr. 18, 2001). We have reviewed the parties’ briefs,

the joint appendix, the district court’s opinion, and Appellants’ supplemental material submitted in accordance with Fed. R. App. P.

28(j), in light of the applicable standards of review and find no reversible error in the district court’s decision to grant the Rule 12(b)(6)

motion. Nor do we find any abuse of discretion in the court’s denial

2 FERGUSON v. MAITA
of the motion to amend. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. Ferguson v. Maita, No. CA-99-225-1-T (W.D.N.C.

Aug. 24, 2000). 

AFFIRMED

FERGUSON v. MAITA 3
Fw: please forward to Cortney 

 Bill Maxwell 

 to: Cortney_Higgins 

 02/23/2011 05:58 PM 

 Cc: RobertJ Wayland, Ron Evans 

Cortney -- 

As requested during today's meeting. 

Thanks. 

Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt 

Bill Maxwell 

Energy Strategies Group 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

U.S. EPA Mail Code D243-01 

109 T.W. Alexander Drive 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

Phone: 919-541-5430 

FAX: 919-541-5450 

----- Forwarded by Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/23/2011 05:57 PM ----- 

From: Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US 

To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Larry Sorrels/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Jim 

DeMocker/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Rob Brenner/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 02/23/2011 04:10 PM 

Subject: please forward to Cortney 

Bob, during the call just now Amanda Lee asked about documentation for 

changes in the EMPAX model to reflect the benefits side. Here is a copy 

of the final SAB review draft of the 812 report which contains the 

explanation. The discussion of benefits adjustments to EMPAX begins on 

page 8-13 (p.204 of the pdf). Please forward this to Cortney. 

The link is http://www.epa.gov/oar/sect812/aug10/fullreport.pdf
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7574
EUGENE NESBITT, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MICHAEL G. BERG, Defendant - Appellee, PARRIS N. GLENDENING; MARTIN O’MALLEY; EDWARD T. NORRIS, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (1:06-cv-01605-WMN) Submitted: March 29, 2007 Decided: April 4, 2007 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eugene Nesbitt, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Eugene Nesbitt, Jr. appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Nesbitt v. Berg , No. 1:06-cv-01605-WMN (D. Md. Aug. 30, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

SERGEI KOVALEV,

Petitioner

v.

BOARD OF REVISION OF TAXES CITY OF 

PHILADELPHIA,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 3 EAL 2020 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Unpublished Order of the 

Superior Court at No. 2898 EDA 

2019 entered on December 3, 2019, 

quashing the Order of the 

Philadelphia County Court of 

Common Pleas at No. 190801135 

entered on September 23, 2019 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of July, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

GRANTED, and the order of the Superior Court is VACATED. See Grant v. Blaine, 868 

A.2d 400, 402 (Pa. 2005) (holding that “an order denying in forma pauperis status is a

final, appealable order”). The matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court for 

consideration of the propriety and advisability of a transfer of the appeal to the 

Commonwealth Court, see 42 Pa.C.S. §704(a), as well as further proceedings, in one of 

those courts, on the underlying appeal. 

The Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis is GRANTED, limited to the filing of 

the Petition for Allowance of Appeal.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>    5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such on Form 10-QSB
for the six months period ended June 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          16,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  621,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               637,000
<PP&E>                                      57,568,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              39,606,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,599,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       31,650,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                  (13,051,000)
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,599,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,105,000
<CGS>                                          874,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,067,000                     
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             600,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (962,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (962,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (962,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                   GTECH HOLDINGS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                            (Unaudited)
                                                                        Three Months Ended
                                                                      -----------------------
                                                                       May 28,       May 29,
                                                                        2005          2004
                                                                      ---------     ---------
                                                                      (Dollars in thousands)
<S>                                                                   <C>           <C>
Earnings:
 Income before income taxes                                           $  85,694     $  85,103
 Add:
   Interest on indebtedness                                               7,265         4,336
   Equity income, net of distributions                                   (1,787)         (494)
   Minority losses                                                        1,309           353
   Portion of rents representative of the interest factor                   315           329
   Amortization of capitalized interest                                     199           169
                                                                      ---------     ---------
      Earnings available for fixed charges                            $  92,995     $  89,796
                                                                      =========     =========

Fixed charges:
    Interest on indebtedness                                              7,265         4,336
    Portion of rents representative of the interest factor                  315           329
    Capitalized interest                                                      -           146
                                                                      ---------     ---------
      Total fixed charges                                             $   7,580     $   4,811
                                                                      =========     =========

        Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                12.27         18.66
                                                                      =========     =========
</TABLE>