alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1116 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1116

  To amend title 10, United States Code, to increase the educational 
 assistance allowance with respect to skills or specialties for which 
               there is a critical shortage of personnel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 2, 1995

  Mr. Montgomery (for himself, Mr. Stump, Mr. Buyer, Ms. Waters, Mr. 
  Evans, Mr. Clyburn, and Mr. Mascara) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on National Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 10, United States Code, to increase the educational 
 assistance allowance with respect to skills or specialties for which 
               there is a critical shortage of personnel.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 16131 of 
title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
    ``(j) In the case of an individual who has a skill or specialty 
designated by the Secretary concerned as a skill or specialty in which 
there is a critical shortage of personnel or for which it is difficult 
to recruit, the Secretary concerned, under regulations prescribed by 
the Secretary of Defense, may increase the rate of the educational 
assistance allowance applicable to such individual to such rate in 
excess of the rate prescribed under subparagraphs (A) through (D) of 
subsection (b)(1) as the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate, 
but the amount of any such increase may not exceed $350 per month.''.
                                 <all>
```
(logo) pwc

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

 

To the Board of Directors andshareholders of CoreLogic, Inc.:

 

We have examined management’sassertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance,that CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc. (the "Company"),a subsidiary of CoreLogic, Inc. complied with the servicing criteria set forth inItem 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for allloans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Companyserved as the commercial tax service provider (the "Platform"), as ofDecember 31, 2016 and for the year then ended, only including 1122(d)(1)(iv),1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(2)(v), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi),1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which the Company has determined areapplicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to thePlatform. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with theservicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management'sassertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicableservicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considerednecessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selectedservicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether theCompany performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicableservicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected servicingactivities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errorsthat may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may haveaffected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company duringthe period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides areasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legaldetermination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementionedapplicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016for all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which theCompany served as the commercial tax service provider is fairly stated, in allmaterial respects.

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers

 

February 6, 2017

 

 

*PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 1800, Dallas TX 75201-2997*

*T: 214-746-6500, F:214-712-6660,*www.pwc.com
Exhibit 35.21



|     |  |                                                                                                          
|---- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1050-084, 8th Fl
401 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2016, by and among WELLS FARGO
COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as General Master Servicer, CWCAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, as General Special Servicer, NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BANK, N.A., as NCB Master Servicer and as NCB
Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, and PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Operating Advisor and as Asset Representations Reviewer with respect to
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2016-LC25 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify
that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the General Master Servicer during the period from December 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the Reporting Period) , and of its performance per the Agreement during
such period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the General Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of
February 2017.



|                        
|------------------------
|LOGO                    
|Daniel Bober            
|Executive Vice President
|Wells Fargo Bank        



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
**Exhibit 32**

 

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, we, theundersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively,of Community First Bankshares, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify:

 

1)              That the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofthe Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2)              That information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  August 6, 2004 |                                                  |
|---------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                            | /s/ Mark A. Anderson                                  |   |
|                            | Mark A. Anderson                                      |
|                            | President and Chief Executive Officer                 |
|                            |                                                  |
|                            |                                                  |
| Date: August 6, 2004       |                                                  |
|                            | /s/ Craig A. Weiss                                    |   |
|                            | Craig A. Weiss                                        |
|                            | Executive Vice President and Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Geology and uranium deposits of the Laguna district, New 
Mexico

#### Professional Paper 519

Tweet


#### Links

- Document: **Document**                                 
  (19033 pdf)
- Plates:
- **Plate 1**                                 
    (1326 pdf)
- **Plate 2**                                 
    (1287 pdf)
- **Plate 3**                                 
    (1989 pdf)
- **Plate 4**                                 
    (1728 pdf)
- **Plate 5**                                 
    (2277 pdf)
- **Plate 6**                                 
    (3328 pdf)
- **Plate 7**                                 
    (298 pdf)
- **Plate 8**                                 
    (4490 pdf)
- **Plate 9**                                 
    (1053 pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp519 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 
2012 00:06:02
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1154

To amend the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972

to prohibit the ocean dumping of radioactive waste, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 7, 1995

Mr. WELDON of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. MANTON, Mr.

STUDDS, Mr. UNDERWOOD, Mr. BEILENSON, and Mr. FIELDS of Texas)

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on

Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To amend the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries

Act of 1972 to prohibit the ocean dumping of radioactive

waste, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ocean Radioactive

5 Dumping Ban Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE OCEAN DUMPING ACT.

7 The Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries

8 Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1401 et seq.) is amended—

9 (1) in section 3 (33 U.S.C. 1402), by—
2

HR 1154 IH

1 (A) striking paragraph (j); and

2 (B) redesignating the following paragraphs

3 accordingly;

4 (2) by altering any reference to the paragraphs

5 redesignated under paragraph (1) of this Act;

6 (3) in section 102(a) (33 U.S.C. 1412(a)), by

7 striking ‘‘high-level’’ before ‘‘radioactive waste’’; and

8 (4) in section 104 (33 U.S.C. 1414), by striking

9 subsection (i).

10 SEC. 3. CLARIFICATION.

11 Nothing in this Act shall affect the transportation of

12 material containing de minimis levels of radioactivity for

13 the purpose of dumping it into ocean waters under the

14 Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of

15 1972.

Æ
#### § 48.6416(b)(3)-1 Tax-paid articles used for further manufacture and causing overpayments of tax.

In the case of any payment of tax under chapter 32 that is determined to be an overpayment under section 6416(b)(3) and § 48.6416(b)(3)-2 by reason of the sale of an article (other than coal taxable under section 4121), directly or indirectly, by the manufacturer of the article to a subsequent manufacturer who uses the article in further manufacture of a second article or who sells the article with, or as a part of, the second article manufactured or produced by the subsequent manufacturer, the subsequent manufacturer may file claim for refund of the overpayment or may claim credit for the overpayment on any return of tax under this subpart subsequently filed. No interest shall be paid on any credit or refund allowed under this section. For provisions relating to the evidence required in support of a claim for credit or refund, see § 301.6402-2 of this chapter (Regulations on Procedure and Administration) and §§ 48.6416(a)-3 and 48.6416(b)(3)-3. For provisions authorizing the taking of a credit in lieu of filing a claim for refund, see section 6416(d) and § 48.6416(f)-1.

[T.D. 8043, 50 FR 32030, Aug. 8, 1985]
Exhibit 32.2
                                                                ------------


             STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
             SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


The undersigned, Deborah A. McLaughlin, is the Chief Financial Officer and
Chief Operating Officer of Slade's Ferry Bancorp. (the "Company").  This
statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of
the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2005  (the "Report").

By execution of this statement, I certify that:

      1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
            or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
            78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

      2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
            covered by the Report.

This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so
that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not
intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date:  August 15, 2005                 /s/ Deborah A. McLaughlin
       -----------------------         ------------------------------------
                                                      Deborah A. McLaughlin
                                                   Executive Vice President
                                                   Chief Financial Officer/
                                                   Chief Operations Officer


<PAGE>  40
§ 19.115 How does an exclusion restrict a person's involvement in covered transactions? With the exceptions stated in §§ 19.120, 19.315, and 19.420, a person who is excluded by the Department of the Treasury or any other Federal agency may not: ( a ) Be a participant in a(n) Department of the Treasury transaction that is a covered transaction under subpart B of this part;
( b ) Be a participant in a transaction of any other Federal agency that is a covered transaction under that agency's regulation for debarment and suspension; or
( c ) Act as a principal of a person participating in one of those covered transactions.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000857953
<NAME> JMAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       3,540,929
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,158,168
<ALLOWANCES>                                    71,193
<INVENTORY>                                  6,599,851
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,201,560
<PP&E>                                       6,367,745
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,512,871
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,930,760
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,508,374
<BONDS>                                        589,155
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       180,435
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,652,796
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,930,760
<SALES>                                     18,141,946
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,141,946
<CGS>                                       12,900,413
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,900,413
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,596,882
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             180,214
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,296,255)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,296,255)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,296,255)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Micky Fong, Appellant.

[803 NYS2d 436]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunlop, J.), rendered February 20, 2003, convicting him of promoting prostitution in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish that he managed, supervised, or controlled a prostitution business is unpreserved for appellate *398review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Gray,*86 NY2d 10, 19 [1995]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see*CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Florio, J.P., Crane, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.
39726.

#### KREUTZ et al. v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN.

Decided February 7, 1963.

*317
      *H. Dale Thompson,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Wm. Malcolm Towson,*contra.

Ehankum, Judge.

It is apparent that in rendering the judgment on the condemnees’ application for distribution of the fund paid into the registry of the court pursuant to the award of the assessors and the judgment of condemnation, the court acted on the theory that the condemnor was concerned with the distribution of said fund. This was an erroneous theory. “Where the condemnor pays the amount of the award of the assessors into the registry of the court as provided by Chapter 36-11 of the Code, the condemnor is not thereafter concerned with its distribution. *Code*§ 36-1113.” *State Highway Dept. v. Taylor,*216 Ga. 90 (3), supra. See *State Highway Dept. v. Taylor,*102 Ga. App. 15 (115 SE2d 703). As stated in *State Highway Dept. v. Hendrix,*215 Ga. 821, 826 (113 SE2d 761): “, . . [T]he purpose and the mandatory requirement of the amended act [Chapter 36-11 of the Code of 1933, as amended] is for the condemnor to pay the same [the amount of the award] into the registry of the court so that it may be. disbursed after a judgment ■ has been taken against the property described in the petition and to those responding parties whom the judge, after hearing their respective claims thereto, finds to be justly entitled.”

There were no claims to the fund in question other than the claims designated in the condemnees’ application. Accordingly, the court erred in rendering the judgment requiring the condemnees and their attorney to give a bond payable to the condemnor as a condition precedent to receiving the full amount of the fund aforesaid to which they were entitled.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.*
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Winton Financial Corporation (the
"Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this Certification (the
"Report"), I, Robert L. Bollin, the President of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
     the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




                                     /s/ Robert L. Bollin
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Robert L. Bollin
                                     President
                                     (Chief Executive Officer)

                                     Date:  August 13, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Winton Financial Corporation and will be retained by Winton
Financial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.