alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2020155DE.01005101.xml

| 18.5.2020 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 155/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.5.2020

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 155/51

---

Berichtigung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) 2019/1746 der Kommission vom 1. Oktober 2019 zur Änderung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) 2017/1185 mit Durchführungsbestimmungen zu den Verordnungen (EU) Nr. 1307/2013 und (EU) Nr. 1308/2013 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates in Bezug auf die Übermittlung von Informationen und Dokumenten an die Kommission

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 268 vom 22. Oktober 2019
  )

Seite 12, Anhang I zur Änderung von Anhang I der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) 2017/1185, Nummer 7 („Milch und Milcherzeugnisse“) Absatz 1:

Anstatt:

„
  Gegenstand der Mitteilung: Preise für Molkenpulver, Magermilchpulver, Vollmilchpulver, Butter, Rahm, Trinkmilch und Industriekäse, ausgedrückt je 100 kg des Erzeugnisses.“

muss es heißen:

„
  Gegenstand der Mitteilung: Preise für Molkenpulver, Magermilchpulver, Vollmilchpulver, Butter, Rahm, Konsummilch und Industriekäse, ausgedrückt je 100 kg des Erzeugnisses.“

---
SMITH COUNTY COURTHOUSE

100 N. BROADWAY 4 th Floor TYLER, TEXAS 75702
April Allison Sikes, First Assistant 

# D. Matt Bingham Criminal District Attorney Smith County TELEPHONE: (903) 535-0520 TELECOPIER: (903) 590-1719 Jennifer Barfield, Office Manager Michael J. West. Appellate Chief Ms. Pam Estes, Clerk 12 th Court of Appeals 1517 W Front St., Ste. 354 Tyler, TX 75701 September 30, 2015
RE: Barrett v. State, Cause Number 12-15-00146-CR

Dear Ms. Lusk:
The State acknowledges receipt of the brief filed by Appellant’s counsel pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in the above-listed cause(s). The brief presents no claims of error; therefore, the State has no points to which to respond. See T EX

. R. A

PP

. P. 38.2(a)(2). The State will not file any further response unless the Court decides that the appeal is not frivolous and orders one. See Anders , 386 U.S. at 744; High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 810 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978). Respectfully submitted,

D. MATT BINGHAM Criminal District Attorney Smith County, Texas

_______________________ Michael J. West Assistant Criminal District Attorney SBOT# 21203300 ACCEPTED 12-15-00146-CR TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS 9/30/2015 9:34:18 AM

Pam Estes CLERKC E R T I F I C A T E O F S E R

V I C E

I h e r e by c e r

t i f y t ha t a c opy of t h e S t a

t e ’ s a c k now le dg m e nt of f i li ng o f a n A nde rs
b r i e f w a s s e r

v e d by e l e c t r oni c f

i l i ng on S e p t e m

be r 30, 2015, o n M

r

. J a m e s H ug g l e r , A t t or ne y a t L a w , 100 E a s t F e r g

us o n, S t e . 805, T

y l e r , T e x a s 75702.

_ ________________________ M i c ha e l J . W

e s t A s s i s t a nt C r i m i n a l D i s t r i c t A

tt or ne y S B O T # 21203300 1 00 N . B r oa dw

a y , 4t h F l

. T y l e r , T e x a s 75702 ( 9 03) 590- 1720 ( 9 03) 590- 1719 ( f

a x )

m w e s t @ s m i t h-c ount y.c om
§ 53.4941(f)-1 Effective dates. ( a ) *In general.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, §§ 53.4941(a)-1 through 53.4941(e)-1 shall apply to all acts of self-dealing engaged in after December 31, 1969.
( b ) *Transitional rules* — ( 1 ) *Commitments made prior to January 1, 1970, between private foundations and government officials.* Section 4941 shall not apply to a payment for one or more purposes described in section 170(c) (1) or (2)(B) made on or after January 1, 1970, by a private foundation to a government official, if such payment is made pursuant to a commitment entered into prior to such date, but only if such commitment was made in accordance with the foundation's usual practices and is reasonable in amount in light of the purposes of the payment. For purposes of this subparagraph, a commitment will be considered entered into prior to January 1, 1970, if prior to such date, the amount and nature of the payments to be made and the name of the payee were entered on the records of the payor, or were otherwise adequately evidenced, or the notice of the payment to be received was communicated to the payee in writing.
( 2 ) *Special transitional rule.* In the case of an act of self-dealing engaged in prior to July 5, 1971, section 4941(a) (1) shall not apply if: ( i ) The participation (as defined in § 53.4941(a)-1(a)(3)) by the disqualified person in such act is not willful and is due to reasonable cause (as defined in § 53.4941(a)-1(b) (4) and (5)),
( ii ) The transaction would not be a prohibited transaction if section 503(b) applied, and
( iii ) The act is corrected (within the meaning of § 53.4941(e)-1(c)) within a period ending [insert 90 days after date on which final regulations under section 4941 are filed by the Federal Register], extended (prior to the expiration of the original period) by any period which the Commissioner determines is reasonable and necessary (within the meaning of § 53.4941(e)-1(d)) to bring about correction of the act of self-dealing.
Tunnel

0.2

0.3

0.3

0.4

0.2

0.9

0.1

0.8

0.1

0.9

0.6

Lake Trail

Cross Country Trail

Kendall Lake Shelter

Kendall

Lake

Pine 

Hollow

Crow

Foot

Gulley

to Pine Grove

and Ledges Trails

Truxell Road

Quick Road

0

0

0.25 Kilometers

0.25 Miles

to 

Peninsula

to 

Akron

Salt Run Trail

Akron Peninsula 

Road

White Oak

Spring

KENDALL HILLS

Short 

Cut

Dam

Kendall Park Road

to

Route 8

Map

Available

Salt Run Trail

Connector Trails

Lake Trail

Other Trails

Streams

Trailhead

Parking

Picnic Area

Restrooms

Contour lines at 10-foot intervals. 

Trail locations approximate.

Shelter

Sledding

Cross Country

Skiing

Distance between arrows (in miles) 0.2

North

Map updated 8/2013.

Salt Run and Lake Trails

National Park Service

U.S. Department of the Interior

Cuyahoga Valley National Park

SALT RUN TRAIL

Distance .........................3.3 miles

Time ................................. 2 hours

Rating ....... moderate to difcult

Elevation Change ...........160 feet

LAKE TRAIL

Distance ............................. 1 mile

Time ........................... 45 minutes

Rating ................................... easy

Elevation Change ............ 20 feet
**Exhibit 32**

 

# **CertificationPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. §1350, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial Officer, respectively, of Community First Bankshares, Inc. (the“Company”), hereby certify:

 

1)              Thatthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period endedMarch 31, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2)              Thatinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  May 6, 2004 | /s/ Mark A. Anderson |                                                  |
|-------------------------|----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                    |                 | Mark A. Anderson                                      |
|                    |                 | President and Chief Executive Officer                 |
|                    |                 |
|                    |                 |
| Date: May 6, 2004       | /s/ Craig A. Weiss   |                                                  |
|                    |                 | Craig A. Weiss                                        |
|                    |                 | Executive Vice President and Chief  Financial Officer |
|                         |                      |                                                       |  |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1207 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1207

  To revise the master plan of Voyageurs National Park, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 1995

 Mr. Oberstar introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To revise the master plan of Voyageurs National Park, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited at the ``Voyageurs National Park 
Revitalization Act of 1995''.
    Sec. 2. The Act entitled ``An Act to authorize the establishment of 
the Voyageurs National Park in the State of Minnesota, and for other 
purposes'', approved January 8, 1971 (84 Stat. 1971), as amended, is 
amended by adding the following new section at the end of the Act:

                       ``revision of master plan

    ``Sec. 501. (a) Prohibition of Wilderness Designation.--The 
Secretary shall not take any action to further the designation of any 
area within Voyageurs National Park as wilderness under the Wilderness 
Act (78 Stat. 890).
    ``(b) Recreational Activities.--The Secretary shall permit access 
and use of motorboats, aircraft, hiking, and skiing, on all major lakes 
and bays within the park and at least the following interior lakes--
Beast, Cruiser, Oslo, Locator, War Club, Quill, Loiten, Shoepack, 
Little Trout, and Mukooda.
    ``(c) Snowmobile Use.--Notwithstanding any provision of law, 
including but not limited to the Endangered Species Act (87 Stat. 884), 
the Secretary shall permit access and use of snowmobiles to the lakes 
listed in subsection (b) of this section.
    ``(d) Study on Future Development.--The Secretary shall undertake a 
study on the cost of constructing and maintaining additional cross-
country ski routes, snowmobile trails, hiking trails, camp sites, and 
overnight ski huts to allow access to and use of the lakes listed in 
subsection (b) of this section. The Secretary shall complete such study 
and report to Congress on the results thereof within six months of the 
date of enactment of this Act.
    ``(e) Houseboat Use.--The Secretary shall authorize at least 200 
houseboats to operate within the boundaries of the park.
    ``(f) Revision of Master Plan.--Within one year from the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall revise the master plan for 
the park to incorporate changes mandated by this Act.''.
                                 <all>
```
### -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74 38 39 40 41 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 08/23 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 23 Aug 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.86 N 77.06 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
**
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Ben C. Rodgers,certify that: 

 
1.
I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form10-K of Altus Midstream Company; and 

 
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. 

 

/s/ Ben C. Rodgers
Ben C. RodgersChief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
Date: April 5, 2019 
**
# L_2020344EN.01003501.xml

| 19.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 344/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/35

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/1482 of 14 October 2020 amending Decision (CFSP) 2018/1544 concerning restrictive measures against the proliferation and use of chemical weapons

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 341 of 15 October 2020
  )

On page 11, in the Annex, first column of the table, 'Name':

for:

| '11. | Sergei Vladilenovich KIRIYENKO
  (Сергей Вадиленович КИРИЕНКО)', |
| --- | --- |

'11.

(Сергей Вадиленович КИРИЕНКО)',

read:

| '11. | Sergei Vladilenovich KIRIYENKO
  (Сергей Владиленович КИРИЕНКО)' |
| --- | --- |

'11.

(Сергей Владиленович КИРИЕНКО)'

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 23, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-11291

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JACK EDWARD BALL,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:04-CR-93-ALL-P

--------------------

Before SMITH, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jack Edward Ball appeals the sentence imposed following his

guilty-plea conviction for two counts of theft or receipt of

stolen mail matter, arguing that it violates the Sixth Amendment

rule announced in Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004). 

Ball’s Blakely objection in the district court preserved whether

Ball’s sentence violated United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220

(2005), for appeal. Accordingly, we review for harmless error,

which requires a showing beyond a reasonable doubt that the
No. 04-11291

-2-

district court would have imposed the same sentence if it had

been operating under an advisory guidelines system. See United

States v. Pineiro, 410 F.3d 282, 284 (5th Cir. 2005). 

Our review of the record convinces us that the error in this

case cannot be considered harmless. Although the district court

sentenced Ball at the top of the guideline range authorized by

the then-mandatory guidelines range, that fact is insufficient,

standing alone, to satisfy the Government’s burden. See United

States v. Woods, 440 F.3d 255, 258-59 (5th Cir. 2006). The

district court’s comments about the seriousness of Ball’s offense

and the impact of his offense shed no additional light on what

the court would have done if the Guidelines had been advisory;

they may simply reflect why the court believed the sentence was

appropriate within the mandatory guidelines framework. Cf.

United States v. Garza, 429 F.3d 165, 170 (5th Cir. 2005), cert.

denied, 126 S. Ct. 1444 (2006). 

Ball has abandoned on appeal his challenge to the district

court’s calculation of his criminal history score. See United

States v. Valdiosera-Godinez, 932 F.2d 1093, 1099 (5th Cir.

1991). 

SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.
EXHIBIT C

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Blackhawk Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, R.
Richard Bastian, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ R. Richard Bastian, III
---------------------------
R. Richard Bastian, III
President and Chief Executive Officer
August 8,  2002
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 112 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 112

 To amend section 223 of the Communications Act of 1934 to prevent the 
        harassment by computer modem or other electronic device.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

  Mr. Mfume introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 223 of the Communications Act of 1934 to prevent the 
        harassment by computer modem or other electronic device.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Electronic Anti-Stalking Act of 
1995''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

    Section 223(a) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 223(a)) 
is amended by adding at the end thereof the following new sentence: 
``For purposes of subparagraphs (B), (C), and (D), the terms 
`telephone' and `telephone call' include communications by means of 
computer modem or any other two-way wire or radio telecommunications 
device.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Roshanda D., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[804 NYS2d 919]

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Harold J. Lynch, J.), entered on or about June 16, 2004, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that she had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and placed her with the Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning credibility *(see People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94 [1903]). The credible evidence disproved the defense of justification beyond a reasonable doubt. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Tom, Mazzarelli, Marlow and Catterson, JJ.
Chenega Bay 

prince william soun.d 

ECONOMIC 

DEVELOPMENT 

DISTRICT 

December 3, 2014 

Kevin Schlemmer, Chief, EAS Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U. S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S. E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

',_,: 

RE: Continuation of Alaska Airlines' Essential Air Service at Cordova, Gustavus, Petersburg, 

Wrangell, and Yakutat, Alaska, Docket OST-1998-4899 

Dear Mr. Schlemmer: 

On behalf of Prince William Sound Economic Development District, I would like to offer our 

strong support for the selection of Alaska Airlines to continue providing essential air service to 

our community of Cordova. Alaska Airlines provides non-stop flights to and from Anchorage, 

as well as service to other communities in Southeast Alaska, including our capital city, Juneau. 

From the major hubs, Alaska Airlines connects with other major national and international air 

carriers. 

Cordova's world famous Copper River Red salmon is quickly transported to major cities across 

our nation every May/June, as a premium quality seafood, by Alaska Airlines. Tourism is 

enhanced by Alaska Airlines flights to Cordova, including world-class heli-skiing available each 

winter, and the annual spring Prince William Sound Shorebird Festival. Alaska Airlines aircraft 

are equipped with Required Navigation Performance Technology, which enables the airline to 

reliably access the airport during inclement weather, an important safety factor. 

Alaska Airlines has served our community exceptionally well for years, therefore we support 

their application to provide Essential Air Service to Prince William Sound and Southeast Alaska. 

Thank you for considering our request. 

s~c 

Sue Cogswell, Executive~ 

ALASKA REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION 

Cordova 

Tatitlek 

Valdez 

Whittier 

2207 Spenard Rd., Suite 207 ·Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Phone (907) 222-2440 ·FAX (907) 222-2411 ·Cell (907) 223-7672 ·Email: pwsedd@gci.net
§ 49.4251-1 Imposition of tax. ( a ) *In general.* Section 4251 imposes a tax on amounts paid for general telephone service; toll telephone service; telegraph service; teletypewriter exchange service; wire mileage service; and wire and equipment service. See § 49.4251-2 for rate and application of tax.
( b ) *Termination of tax on general telephone service.* ( 1 ) Except as otherwise provided in subparagraph (2) of this paragraph, no tax is imposed on amounts paid on or after July 1, 1965, for general telephone service rendered on or after such date.
( 2 ) In the case of amounts paid pursuant to bills rendered on or after July 1, 1965, for general telephone service for which no previous bill was rendered, no tax is imposed on that portion of the amount paid pursuant to such bill or bills as is attributable to general telephone service rendered subsequent to April 30, 1965. However, the tax applies to that portion of the amount paid pursuant to any such bill or bills as is attributable to general telephone service rendered prior to May 1, 1965. The tax also applies to amounts paid for general telephone service pursuant to bills rendered before July 1, 1965, without regard to when the payment is made or the service is rendered.
[T.D. 6664, 28 FR 7252, July 16, 1963, as amended by T.D. 6694, 28 FR 12929, Dec. 5, 1963; T.D. 6753, 29 FR 12718, Sept. 9, 1964]
§ 53.4965-4 Definition of tax-exempt party to a prohibited tax shelter transaction. ( a ) *In general.* For purposes of sections 4965 and 6033(a)(2), a tax-exempt entity is a party to a prohibited tax shelter transaction if the entity— ( 1 ) Facilitates a prohibited tax shelter transaction by reason of its tax-exempt, tax indifferent or tax-favored status; or
( 2 ) Is identified in published guidance, by type, class or role, as a party to a prohibited tax shelter transaction.
( b ) Published guidance may identify which tax-exempt entities, by type, class or role, will not be treated as a party to a prohibited tax shelter transaction.
( c ) *Example.* The following example illustrates the principle of paragraph (a)(1) of this section: Example. A tax-exempt entity enters into a transaction (Transaction A) with an S corporation. Transaction A is the same as or substantially similar to the transaction identified by the Secretary as a listed transaction in Notice 2004-30 (2004-1 CB 828). The tax-exempt entity's role in Transaction A is similar to the role of the tax-exempt party, as described in Notice 2004-30. Under the terms of the transaction, as described in Notice 2004-30, the tax-exempt entity receives the S corporation stock and purports to aid the S corporation and its shareholders in avoiding taxable income. The tax-exempt entity facilitates Transaction A by reason of its tax-exempt, tax indifferent or tax-favored status. Accordingly, the tax-exempt entity is a party to Transaction A for purposes of sections 4965 and 6033(a)(2). *See* § 601.601(d)(2)(ii)( b ) of this chapter.
( d ) *Effective/applicability dates.* See § 53.4965-9 for the discussion of the relevant effective and applicability dates.
[T.D. 9492, 75 FR 38702, July 6, 2010]