alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOffice of the SpokespersonPress Releases...Arrival of Wheat-Carrying Brave Commander to East Africa from Ukraine

# 									Arrival of Wheat-Carrying Brave Commander to East Africa from Ukraine							

Press Statement

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

August 30, 2022

The United States welcomes the arrival in Djibouti of 23,300 metric tons of Ukrainian grain aboard the ship *Brave Commander*. This grain will be distributed within the Horn of Africa*, a region that is dangerously food insecure after four years of drought. The United States is grateful for the important role Djibouti has played facilitating the flow of humanitarian goods to the region. The United States is grateful for the important role Djibouti has played facilitating the flow of humanitarian goods to the region.

As part of a more than $68 million recent contribution by the United States to the World Food Program (WFP), this grain is among the first shipments of Ukrainian agricultural products exported from the Black Sea to reach some of the world’s most food insecure countries since the beginning of Russia’s unjustified, full-scale attack on Ukraine on February 24. The United States is the largest contributor to the WFP, having provided $5.7 billion to the organization since October 2021. Since February, the United States has provided over $5.4 billion in humanitarian assistance to scale up emergency food security operations in food insecure countries globally.

Ukrainian agricultural products are critical to global food security. The United States supports the Turkey and UN-brokered deal between Ukraine and Russia to resume Ukrainian agricultural exports via the Black Sea, and we are closely monitoring Russia’s adherence to the deal’s terms. We call on Russia to immediately cease its war on Ukraine, which would do much to address the recent spike in global food insecurity.

**Updated 31 August to specific region*

 

Tags

AgricultureBureau of African AffairsBureau of European and Eurasian AffairsFood SecurityOffice of Global Food SecurityOffice of the SpokespersonRussiaThe Secretary of StateSomaliaUkraine

Back to Top
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 306.126 Waiver of regulations.

The Secretary of the Treasury reserves the right, in his discretion, to waive or modify any provision or provisions of these regulations in any particular case or class of cases for the convenience of the United States or in order to relieve any person or persons of unnecessary hardship, if such action is not inconsistent with law, does not impair any existing rights, and he is satisfied that such action would not subject the United States to any substantial expense or liability.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 February 28, 2014

p0224

Order 

Clerk

February 28, 2014

148166 & (21)

JOSEPH ZIEGLER,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v SC: 148166

COA: 314686

Ingham CC: 12-000449-AA

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH,

Respondent-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion to strike is DENIED. The application for leave 

to appeal the October 17, 2013 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is 

DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed 

by this Court.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

§ 306.117 Withdrawal of eligible book-entry Treasury securities for conversion to registered form. ( a ) Eligible book-entry Treasury securities may be withdrawn from TRADES by requesting delivery of like definitive Treasury securities.
( b ) Fiscal Service shall, upon receipt of appropriate instructions to withdraw eligible book-entry Treasury securities from book-entry form in TRADES, convert such securities into registered Treasury securities and deliver them in accordance with such instructions; no such conversion shall affect existing interests in such Treasury securities.
( c ) All requests for withdrawal of eligible book-entry Treasury securities must be made prior to the maturity or date of call of the securities.
( d ) Treasury securities which are to be delivered upon withdrawal may be issued in registered form, to the extent permitted by the applicable offering circular.
[61 FR 43637, Aug. 23, 1996; 64 FR 38126, July 15, 1999]
# Cit

y o f Alpena ptfcM r X0^% - G'^O ^

C!T Y HAL L « 20 8 NORT H FIRS T AVENU E * ALPENA , MICHIGA N 49707-288 5 www.alpena.mi.u s

Unite dState s o f

Americ a Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Offic e o f th e Secretary Washington , D.C . Kevi n Adams , e n A s th e newl y electe dMayo r o f Alpena , I amrequestin g an extensio n t o th e RF P regardin g Essentia l Ai r

Servic e t o Alpena , MI . I fee l that ou r city counci l was no t

a s involve di n thi s proces s a s the y shoul dhav e been , likel y du e t o th e fac t tha t th e airport

i s locate doutsid e o f

ou r city limit s an dthe y wer e unde r th e impressio n tha t

i t wa s th e responsibility o f

othe r entities . An y amoun t

o f tim e yo u can affor

du s woul dgiv e me tim e t o ensur e tha t I hav e don e everythin g I can for

ou r community . I appreciat e you r consideration . Sincerely , Matthe w J . Waligor a Mayo r o f Alpen a



# ALPEN A
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1387 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1387

To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to establish a process to 
                 identify and control tax expenditures.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 4, 1995

Mr. Barrett of Wisconsin (for himself and Mrs. Maloney) introduced the 
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Budget, and 
in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
  provisons as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to establish a process to 
                 identify and control tax expenditures.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Tax Expenditure Control Act of 
1995''.

SEC. 2. TAX EXPENDITURES INCLUDED IN BUDGET RESOLUTION.

    Section 301 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(2) by inserting after ``Federal 
        revenues'', both places it appears, the following: ``and tax 
        expenditures (including income tax expenditures or other 
        equivalent base narrowing tax provisions applying to other 
        Federal taxes)''; and
            (2) in subsection (a)(4) by inserting after ``budget 
        outlays,'' the following: ``tax expenditures (including income 
        tax expenditures or other equivalent base narrowing tax 
        provisions applying to other Federal taxes),''.

SEC. 3. TAX EXPENDITURE ANALYSIS IN REPORT ACCOMPANYING BUDGET 
              RESOLUTION.

    Section 301(e)(1) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 is 
amended by inserting after ``revenues'' the following: ``and tax 
expenditures''.

SEC. 4. RECONCILIATION MAY INCLUDE TAX EXPENDITURE CHANGES.

    Section 310(a)(2) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 is 
amended by inserting after ``revenues'' the following: ``and tax 
expenditures''.

SEC. 5. CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE REPORT.

    Section 202(f)(1) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 is 
amended in the matter following subparagraph (B) by striking ``and 
budget outlays'' and inserting ``, budget outlays, and tax 
expenditures''.

SEC. 6. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect on 
the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2020020EN.01002601.xml

| 24.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 20/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 20/26

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2019/2033 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2019 on the prudential requirements of investment firms and amending Regulations (EU) No 1093/2010, (EU) No 575/2013, (EU) No 600/2014 and (EU) No 806/2014

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 314 of 5 December 2019
  )

On page 58, Article 63(4)(e):

for:

‘paragraph 7 is replaced by the following:

“7.   ESMA, in consultation with EBA, shall develop draft regulatory technical standards to specify the information that the applicant third‐country firm is to provide in the application for registration referred to in paragraph 4 and the information to be reported in accordance with paragraph 6a.

ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 26 September 2021.

Power is delegated to the Commission to supplement this Regulation by adopting the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.”;’,

read:

‘paragraph 7 is replaced by the following:

“7.   ESMA, in consultation with EBA, shall develop draft regulatory technical standards to specify the information that the applicant third-country firm is to provide in the application for registration referred to in paragraph 4 and the information to be reported in accordance with paragraph 6a.

ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 26 September 2020.

Power is delegated to the Commission to supplement this Regulation by adopting the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.”;’.

On page 58, Article 63(4)(f):

for:

‘8.   ESMA shall develop draft implementing technical standards to specify the format in which the application for registration referred to in paragraph 4 is to be submitted and the information referred to in paragraph 6a is to be reported.

ESMA shall submit those draft implementing technical standards to the Commission by 26 September 2021.

Power is conferred on the Commission to supplement this Regulation by adopting the implementing technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.’,

read:

‘8.   ESMA shall develop draft implementing technical standards to specify the format in which the application for registration referred to in paragraph 4 is to be submitted and the information referred to in paragraph 6a is to be reported.

ESMA shall submit those draft implementing technical standards to the Commission by 26 September 2020.

Power is conferred on the Commission to supplement this Regulation by adopting the implementing technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.’.

---
14910-1J-Pj



# ~.,- ." 

# • • 

## • • Simultaneous loss of alleast two Main Pwnps along with other potential failures related 10the tn-service event may lead to adual engine loss_ 

# I 

# • • 1 condition on an aviation product The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as:

[f"",,1t h'>«f'}f?5 

### "fil.'''''V;: P-:¥ '4;'1<{

# "c"" rtt>l(/Jwr-"]~~'( An A340·642 operator TlfPorted a Main-Fuel-Pump-4-fault"that CIl:Cll rred--durirrg"descent'l Anerwardsit"was-foHmved-by-a-2"li'i'irusEiTg 4~Fg~-Me~ al1-d. finally theengineh~~anauto sh~utdown 

### [,J),"iJ With M~l. £..b..-.M

## meJr i;~,I"L"f !,c"I] .<U.A~ . 

## • 

# • •• 

# • •• AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportalion ACTION: Final rule; request for comments. SUMMARY: We are adopting anew airworthiness directive (AD) for the products 1 above. This AD results from m~datory continuing airworthiness information (MeA



# I originated 

### by an aviation authority ofanother country to identify and correct an unsa R1N 2120-AA64
(DOT). Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A340~500 and A340-600 Series Airplanes 14CFR Part 39 (Docket No. 

## FAA-2olo..1J1QDir«torate Identifier 2010-NM-052-AD; 

# /1-511 

# 'I :23-;)7 Amendment 39•.".11(."..,,; AD 20'O-H_U' DEPARTMENT OF TRANSiRT ATION Federal Aviation Administration

This AD requires actions that are intended 10address the unsafe condition described in
FAA Form 136D·14.1 (6-89) ilCIAL ALECOPY 1>'U.S. GO\i1ORNMENl PRINTI"G OFFIC~, \!rS~, 11'9_,"
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 2011

- NM

- 115

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 337.2 Transportation charges and risks.

Debentures presented for redemption at call or maturity, or for authorized prior purchase, or for conversion to book-entry form, must be delivered at the expense and risk of the holder. Debentures bearing restricted assignments may be forwarded by registered mail, but for the owner's protection debentures bearing unrestricted assignments should be forwarded by insured registered mail.

[66 FR 56432, Nov. 8, 2001]
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

** **

 

Reference is herebymade to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1,2016, by and among Banc of America Merrill Lynch Commercial Mortgage Inc, asDepositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, MidlandLoan Services, A Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as SpecialServicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator,Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee and Park Bridge LenderServices LLC, as Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer withrespect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2016-C32 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. 

 

Pursuant to Section11.09 of the Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that: 

 

1. A review of theactivities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2018through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance perthe Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2. To the best ofmy knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all ofits obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period. 

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day ofFebruary 2019. 

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

Leslie Hayton 

Managing Director 

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Birch Branch, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Earnest Mathis,
Jr., Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date:    November 7, 2008
                                      /s/ Earnest Mathis, Jr.
                                      -----------------------
                                      Earnest Mathis, Jr.
                                      Chief Executive Officer and Director


<PAGE>
(Superior Court of Cincinnati,

1901.)

#### CARTER v. ENQUIRER CO.

The qualifying provision in sec. 5099 R. S., ■extending the right to address interrogatories to corporations, that in such case the answer under oath shall be by the president, secretary •or other officer thereof as the parties propounding shall require, does not limit the right to require answer only in cases where the ■opposite party designates an officer to answer. Answer may be addressed to the corporation itself where it is apparent that the information is in the possession of all the officers of the corporation.

Alex Murry, for Demurrer.

D. T. Wright, Jr., contra.

Dempsey, J.

Defendant is a corporation, and demurs to •certain interrogatories annexed to plaintiff’s petition, because plaintiff does not designate 'by what officer of defendant company they shall be answered. After a somewhat extended examination of the section of the code providing for such interrogations, (5099), I am of opinion the demurrer ought to be denied.

The code as originally passed March 11 1853, made no provision for interrogatories. See section 105, 51 O. L., p. 74.) In 1857, this defect if defect it was, was cured by an amendment to section 105, which provided that such interrogatories might be annexed, by any party, whether plaintiff or defendant, “in all cases in which he would have the right to use the deposition of an adverse party.” (54 Ohio Laws, 23; S. & C., 982.)

This limitation on the right excluded as a necessary consequence the right to propound interrogatories to corporations because in the nature of things' their depositions could not be taken, and could not be used against them .

To remedy this, the legislature amended the act in 1873, *(70*O. L., 54), so as to extend the right as against corporations. The qualifying clause that “if such party is a corporation,” the answer under oath shall be “by the president, secretary, or other officer thereof, as the party propounding requires,” does not in my opinion limit the right to require answers only in cases where he opposite party designates an officer to answer.

The remedy for failure to answer provided for in section 5101 was a part of original section 105, and one of the penalties was by attachment against a contumacious party.

This remedy, of course, could not apply to the corporation itself, and, in order to make this remedy as effectual against corporations as individuals, an election or choice was given to the interrogating party to select any officer of the corporation whom he could require to make answer. Any other construction of this section would deprive a party, where the very nature of the case would show the information sought to be in the possession of the corporation from the chief down to answer the questions, and that would- be so impracticable that it surely was not the intention of the legislature to enact such a,rule. That it is entirely feasible and practicable to address interrogatories to the corporation itself and procure answers thereto is well .sustained in the well considered cases of Blair v. Sioux City R. R., 73 N. W. 1053, and I. C. R. R. v. Sandford, 75 Miss, 862.

The demurrer is overruled.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 10

- 00316

- CV

JOY NALL APPELLANT

V.

CLOVER HILL APARTMEN TS APPELLEE

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

-- ----------

On September 10, 2010, and September 27, 2010 , we notified appellant,

in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this

appeal unless the $175 filing fee was paid. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). O n

October 27, 2 010, we called the phone number that appellant listed on her notice

of appeal , but t he phone number is no longer in service. We also contacted the

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

trial court clerk and verified that the trial court has the same address as our court

and that there is not a forwarding address for appellant

.

Appellant has not paid the $175 filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

Because appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of

appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court ’s order of August 28 , 2007, 2

we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GAR D N ER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DELIVERED : November 4 , 2 010

2 See Supreme Court of Tex., Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil

Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial

Panel on Multidistrict Litigation , Misc. Docket No. 07

- 9138 (Aug. 28, 2007) (listi ng

fees in courts of appeals).