alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Winton Financial Corporation (the
"Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this Certification (the
"Report"), I, Robert L. Bollin, the President of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                                 /s/Robert L. Bollin
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Robert L. Bollin
                                                 President
                                                 (Chief Executive Officer)

                                                 Date: May 14, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Winton Financial Corporation and will be retained by Winton
Financial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 18 (Thursday, January 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 5173]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1966]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Initial Review Group, Biobehavioral and Behavioral 
Sciences Subcommittee.
    Date: February 24-25, 2009.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites Washington DC, 1250, 22nd Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20037.
    Contact Person: Marita R. Hopmann, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-6911, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1f77706f727e7171725f727e76733171767731787069"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="442c2b3429252a2a290429252d286a2a2d2c6a232b32">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 23, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-1966 Filed 1-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         32,145
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,207,355
<ALLOWANCES>                                   71,429
<INVENTORY>                                    8,201,045
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               12,468,015
<PP&E>                                         1,676,506
<DEPRECIATION>                                 488,640
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 29,112,990
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          13,096,164
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    602
<COMMON>                                       335,101
<OTHER-SE>                                     9,709,675
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   29,112,990
<SALES>                                        7,355,636
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7,444,380
<CGS>                                          7,352,213
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  14,517,042
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             652,212
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,612,704)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,612,704)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,612,704)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.25)
        


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2836

JANETTE MOSLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LOW COUNTRY MEDIA, INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.

(CA-94-2317-2-18)

Submitted: February 27, 1996 Decided: March 21, 1996

Before HALL and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Janette Mosley, Appellant Pro Se. Henry Ellerbe Grimball, GRIMBALL

& CABANISS, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing

her employment discrimination suit as untimely. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Mosley v. Low Country Media, No. CA-94-2317-2-18 (D.S.C. Sept. 13,

1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### In the Matter of Daleesa Mc., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[808 NYS2d 105]

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Pearl, J.), dated July 19, 2004, which, upon a *474fact-finding order of the same court dated May 11, 2004, made after a hearing, finding that the appellant had committed acts, which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree (two counts), adjudged her to be a juvenile delinquent and, inter alia, placed her on probation for a period of 18 months. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order dated May 11, 2004.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the presentment agency *(Matter of David H.,*69 NY2d 792 [1987]; *cf People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish that the appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, under counts five and six of the petition *(see People v Westbrook,*177 AD2d 1039 [1991]; *People v McCall,*137 AD2d 561 [1988]). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the finding was not against the weight of the evidence *(see Matter of Ibrahim D.,*18 AD3d 659 [2005]; *cf.*CPL 470.15 [5]). Schmidt, J.P., S. Miller, Santucci and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2379

RICKY W. CAMPBELL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Sr.,

District Judge. (CA-93-586-2, CA-94-606-2, CA-95-880-1)

Submitted: January 23, 1997 Decided: January 29, 1997

Before RUSSELL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ricky W. Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. Martin K. LaPointe, Terrill

Elise Pierce, ADLER, KAPLAN & BEGY, Chicago, Illinois, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his

consolidated civil actions for failure to comply with the rules of

the court. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. Campbell v. Federal Express Corp., Nos. CA93-586-2; CA-94-606-2; CA-95-880-1 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 6, 1996). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
www.gpo.gov

### §286e–1j. Additional increase in capital stock of Bank; subscription to additional shares; authorization of appropriations

(a) The United States Governor of the Bank is authorized—

(1) to vote for an increase of seventy thousand shares in the authorized capital stock of the Bank; and

(2) to subscribe on behalf of the United States to twelve thousand four hundred and fifty-three additional shares of the capital stock of the Bank, except that any subscription to such additional shares shall be effective only to such extent or in such amounts as are provided in advance in appropriations Acts.

(b) In order to pay for the increase in the United States subscription to the Bank provided for in this section, there are authorized to be appropriated, without fiscal year limitation, $1,502,267,655 for payment by the Secretary of the Treasury.

(July 31, 1945, ch. 339, §51, as added Pub. L. 99–190, §101(i) [title I, (a)], Dec. 19, 1985, 99 Stat. 1291, 1294.)

#### Codification

Section 51 of act July 31, 1945, is based on section 301 of title III of H.R. 2253, Ninety-ninth Congress, as reported May 15, 1985, and enacted into law by Pub. L. 99–190.
#### § 1010.310 Reports of transactions in currency.

Sections 1010.310 through 1010.314 set forth the rules for the reporting by financial institutions of transactions in currency. Unless otherwise indicated, the transactions in currency reporting requirements in §§ 1010.310 through 1010.314 apply to all financial institutions. Each financial institution should refer to subpart C of its chapter X part for any additional transactions in currency reporting requirements.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6117
ROBERT L. IRELAND, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JAMES PEGUESE, Warden; SHAVELLA WATKINS, Sergeant; FRANK SIZER, Commissioner; ARC COORDINATOR; OFFICER WALKER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:05-cv-01387-WDQ) Submitted: October 18, 2007 Decided: October 23, 2007 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert L. Ireland, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Robert L. Ireland appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ireland v. Peguese , No. 1:05-cv-01387-WDQ (D. Md. Dec. 18, 2006). We deny Ireland’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

** **

** **

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Referenceis hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as ofDecember 1, 2016, by and among CREDIT SUISSE COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.,    as  Depositor,  WELLS  FARGO BANK,  NATIONAL  ASSOCIATION,  as Master Servicer,TORCHLIGHT LOAN SERVICES, LLC, as Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,  as  Trustee  and  PARK  BRIDGE LENDER  SERVICES  LLC,  as Operating Advisor and Asset RepresentationsReviewer with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series2016-NXSR (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein nototherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuantto Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President ofCommercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.       Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.       Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, hasfulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28thday of February 2018.

 

/s/Daniel Bober

DanielBober

ExecutiveVice President 

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo)  Together we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-5678-16T1

CAVALRY SPV I, LLC AS 

ASSIGNEE OF FIA CARD

SERVICES, N.A./BANK OF 

AMERICA, N.A.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

ESTIMÉ DIEUVEILLE,

Defendant-Respondent.

______________________________

Submitted September 18, 2018 - Decided 

Before Judges Yannotti, Rothstadt and Gilson. 

On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law 

Division, Hudson County, Docket No. L-1447-16. 

Maurice Wutscher LLP, attorneys for appellant 

(Donald S. Maurice, Jr., and Thomas R. Dominczyk, on 

the brief).

Stern Thomasson LLP, attorneys for respondent (Philip 

D. Stern and Andrew T. Thomasson, on the brief). 

PER CURIAM

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the 

internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.

September 21, 2018
2

A-5678-16T1

Appellant Cavalry SPV I, LLC has advised the court that it wishes to 

withdraw its appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with prejudice and 

without costs.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 13-668V

Filed: June 4, 2014

Not for Publication

*************************************

GERALD LEONARDI, III, *

*

 Petitioner, * Attorneys’ fees and costs decision based on

 * stipulation of fact

v. *

 *

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

 *

 Respondent. *

*

*************************************

Jeffrey S. Pop, Beverly Hills, CA, for petitioner.

Ryan D. Pyles, Washington, DC, for respondent.

MILLMAN, Special Master

DECISION AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1

On June 4, 2014, the parties filed a stipulation of fact in which they agreed on an 

appropriate amount for attorneys’ fees and costs in this case. 

In accordance with the General Order #9 requirement, petitioner asserts that he did not 

incur any costs in pursuit of his petition. Petitioner submitted his request for attorneys’ fees and 

costs to respondent. During informal discussions, respondent raised objections to certain items in

petitioner’s application. Based on these objections, petitioner amends his application for 

 

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master’s action in this 

case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal 

Claims’s website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 

2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made 

available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is 

privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and 

move to redact such information prior to the document=s disclosure. If the special master, upon review, 

agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall 

redact such material from public access.
2

attorneys’ fees and costs to $18,029.46. Respondent does not object to this amount. The 

undersigned finds this amount to be reasonable. Accordingly, the court awards $18,029.46, 

representing reimbursement for attorneys’ fees and costs. The award shall be in the form of a 

check payable jointly to petitioner and Jeffrey S. Pop & Associates, in the amount of $18,029.46.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the 

court is directed to enter judgment herewith.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 4, 2014 s/ Laura D. Millman

 Laura D. Millman

 Special Master

 

2

Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party, either separately or 

jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
www.gpo.gov

### §768. Rules and regulations

The Secretary may make such rules and regulations as are necessary to carry out the purposes of this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 96–227, §9, Apr. 3, 1980, 94 Stat. 322.)
#### Anneke FREEMAN, Appellant v. Mark H. MURRAY, Trooper w/PA State Police; Harriet L. Earnest, CPA; Marsch-Kellogg American Legion Post; County of Pike

No. 01-3740.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) June 11, 2002.

Filed June 18, 2002.

*50Before SLOVITER, ROTH *&*McKEE, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

McKEE, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff Anneke Freeman, appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of each of the defendants and against plaintiff Freeman in the civil rights action she filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. We will affirm.

Inasmuch as we write only for the parties, we need not recite the factual or procedural background of this dispute. We have reviewed the thorough and thoughtful Memorandum which the district court filed on August 30, 2001. We believe that that Memorandum adequately addresses all of the issues plaintiff has presented on appeal, and little can be gained by attempting to add to the discussion the district court has already set forth explaining the reasons for granting defendants’ motions for summary judgment. Accordingly, we will affirm substantially for the reasons set forth in the district court’s Memorandum of August 30, 2001.
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by T.D. 9359, 72 FR 54544, Sept. 26, 2007.

§ 10.65 Supplemental charges. ( a ) *In general.* Supplemental charges may be filed against the respondent by amending the complaint with the permission of the Administrative Law Judge if, for example— ( 1 ) It appears that the respondent, in the answer, falsely and in bad faith, denies a material allegation of fact in the complaint or states that the respondent has insufficient knowledge to form a belief, when the respondent possesses such information; or
( 2 ) It appears that the respondent has knowingly introduced false testimony during the proceedings against the respondent.
( b ) *Hearing.* The supplemental charges may be heard with other charges in the case, provided the respondent is given due notice of the charges and is afforded a reasonable opportunity to prepare a defense to the supplemental charges.
( c ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section is applicable beginning August 2, 2011.
[T.D. 9359, 72 FR 54552, Sept. 26, 2007, as amended by T.D. 9527, 76 FR 32309, June 3, 2011]
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1096

To assure compliance with the guarantees of the 5th, 14th, and 15th amendments to the Constitution by prohibiting the intentional creation of

legislative districts based on race, color, or language minority status

of voters within such districts.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 1, 1995

Mr. FRANKS of Connecticut introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To assure compliance with the guarantees of the 5th, 14th,

and 15th amendments to the Constitution by prohibiting

the intentional creation of legislative districts based on

race, color, or language minority status of voters within

such districts.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION.

4 It shall be unlawful for any State or political subdivi5 sion, in the establishment of districts for the election of

6 members to any Federal, State, or local multi-member

7 body with legislative functions, to create any such district
2

•HR 1096 IH

1 with the intent to assure that a majority of the voters in

2 that district are people of a particular race or color or

3 language minority (as such term is used in title I of the

4 Voting Rights Act of 1965).

5 SEC. 2. CIVIL ACTION.

6 Any person who is aggrieved by a violation of section

7 1 may, in a civil action, obtain appropriate relief.

Æ