alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
10-QSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 FOR DBS INDUSTRIES, INC. AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          24,568
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   74,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               202,987
<PP&E>                                          73,277
<DEPRECIATION>                                  53,433
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,079,141
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,290,425
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,429
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,943,012
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,079,141
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               993,793
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,313,332)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,265
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,317,597)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,317,597)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.22)
        

</TABLE>
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Please see attached.
EXHIBIT 1EXHIBIT 2EXHIBIT 3EXHIBIT 4EXHIBIT 5
t

m

T

6

@

c

m

E

f

|D

Jv

N

q

mx

T

t

=

z

--{

m

c

f

o

w

L

@

=>=

dia

; aa

3+d ^=.=

<.4; -*

-=+

Psd

6'9 o

i;g

ags

Ffrs

=sg

6 > q -ID

_\o+

F"8 3

-s=8

ooQ

foJ

oQ o

<Yf

=HA rgi

-'= d

5dE

d'a;

#E e

sqf

.gr $9l

o-r omc(,(,-

u

O)

w 'Tl

=F

m

{

I

mrfl

r

'Tl

5

q

o

n z m > o l

a o -lz

n >

> r

- J

6 <

z >

< =

x

a

z

q

q

Ol

o

o

m

!

{

3 . mz

o {

se

+; r >

o z >-42

m9t

^4m Yi? >6;

Vzj 9+u

>mO TOI ;flHm-+

c)>i

",SY --t =

e.i

1 z

= >

:g

za

l

o

z

gUP

zoF.

J Ai^7

=*H o i-.i r

F"r 't2A

oUP c

(gA

o-l

A A

; z

3

o

o

o

q,

=.

o

=

\

e

>

o

s

b

1

I

>

a

o

^ =

Oc)

O n

> I

-

am

v

-

z

o

o)

{

o

3

C

@

o

o

qt

i'

di; lgs gse

u$s$3$

i isE gli iffiF

iEEEFi:*g

iqa g ' F P O

ro(.)i

3=;

EZF

3g

=

q

q

o)

o

o
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Election Assistance Commission

# AGENCY:

U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting.

# DATE AND TIME: 

Wednesday, February 4, 2009, 10 a.m.-12 noon.

# PLACE: 

U.S. Election Assistance Commission, 1225 New York Ave., NW., Suite 150, Washington, DC 20005, (Metro Stop: Metro Center).

# AGENDA: 

The Commission will receive an update on the voting system certification program. Commissioners will install new officers for 2009. The Commission will consider other administrative matters.

This meeting will be open to the public.

# FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Bryan Whitener, Telephone: (202) 566-3100.

Rosemary Rodriguez,

Commissioner, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

 [FR Doc. E9-1971 Filed 1-26-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6820-KF-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

______________________________ RAFIQ BIN BASHIR BIN : JALLUL ALHAMI, et al., : : Petitioners, : : v. : Civil Action No. 05-359 (GK) : BARACK H. OBAMA, et al., : : Respondents. : ______________________________: ORDER A Motions Heari n g w a s h e ld in this case on March 19, 2009, which too k p l a c e i n part in open court and in part in a sealed courtroom due to the discussion of classif i e d information. The matt e r i s before the Court on Petitioners’ Motion for Summary J u d g m e nt [Dkt. No. 74]. Upon consideration of the Motion, Opposition, Reply, oral argument, and the entire record herein, and for the reasons set forth below, it is hereby ORDERED , that Petitioners’ Motion f o r Summary Judgment is denied . As stated in open court, and as stated in more detail in closed sessio n , this decision rests on two bases. First, as a procedural matter, summary judgment is inappropriate because Petitioners’ Motion focuses on the wrong record. Petitioners rely on the record as it existed before the fi l i n g of amended factual returns, and therefore make their case without due consideration of the additions and modifications that the Government mad e in its amended returns. Second, material factual disputes exist, as-2-

i n d i c a ted in the Government’s Opposition and as specified in the closed session; and it is further ORDERED , that this case shall proceed under the Court’s Case Management Order. Accordingly, the Government mu s t produce exculpatory evidence by April 10, 2009 ; and it is further ORDERED , that parties shall file by April 23, 2009 , a Joint Status Report, indicating the progress that has been made regarding discovery; and it is further ORDERED , that a Status Conference shall be held on April 27, 2009, at 1:30 p.m .

/ s / March 19, 2009 Gladys Kessler United States District Judge Copies to: Attorneys of Record via ECF
The Honorable Stephen Reasoner, Chief Judge, United States

1

District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the

report and recommendations of the Honorable H. David Young, United

States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

___________

No. 95-2256

___________

Larry Friar, *

 *

Appellant, *

 *

v. * Appeal from the United States

 * District Court for the

Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas * Eastern District of Arkansas.

Department of Correction, *

 * [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: March 5, 1996

 Filed: March 11, 1996

___________

Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas inmate Larry Friar appeals from the district court's denial 1

of his petition for habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

Having reviewed the record, we conclude no error of law appears and we

affirm the judgment of the district court for the reasons set forth in its

opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny Friar's motion for appointment of

counsel.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 32.2





ICONIX BRAND GROUP, INC.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,





AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF





THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Iconix Brand Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period June 30, 2011 (the “Report”), I, Warren Clamen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Warren ClamenWarren ClamenExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate: August 9, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS THREE MONTH YEAR TO DATE SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM AMERICAN BIOGENETIC SCIENCES, INC. 2000 10-Q FOR THE FIRST
QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       4,157,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  284,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    513,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,022,000
<PP&E>                                       2,318,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,865,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,368,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          829,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        44,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,469,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,368,000
<SALES>                                        383,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               959,000
<CGS>                                          156,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  156,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               261,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (498,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (498,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (498,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)



</TABLE>
IA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 56

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to restrict

the requirement of citizenship at birth by virtue of birth in the United

States to persons with a legal resident mother or father.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 19, 1995

Mr. BEILENSON introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States to restrict the requirement of citizenship at birth

by virtue of birth in the United States to persons with

a legal resident mother or father.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several
2

•HJ 56 IH

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission

2 for ratification:

3 ‘‘ARTICLE—

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. All persons born in the United States,

5 and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, of a mother or fa6 ther who is a legal resident of the United States and all

7 persons naturalized in the United States are citizens of

8 the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

9 The first sentence of section 1 of the fourteenth article

10 of amendment to the Constitution of the United States

11 is hereby repealed.

12 ‘‘SECTION 2. The Congress shall have power to en13 force before this article by appropriate legislation.

14 ‘‘SECTION 3. This article shall apply to persons born

15 after the date of its ratification.’’.

Æ
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ronell Peterkin, Appellant.

[804 NYS2d 269]

Appeal by the defendant from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (J. Goldberg, J.), rendered August 25, 2003, convicting him of assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a *679weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence, and (2) an amended sentence of the sainé court imposed November 13, 2003.

Ordered that the judgment and the amended sentence are affirmed.

The defendant’s contention concerning the trial court’s charge on the issue of justification is unpreserved for appellate review, and we decline to review this issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction *(see People v Holmes,*12 AD3d 532 [2004]; *cf. People v Feuer,*11 AD3d 633 [2004]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Luciano, J.P., Crane, Fisher and Lifson, JJ., concur.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23

- 7129

JULIUS ANDREW REASON, III , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. WARDEN JANSON , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence

. Bruce H. Hendricks , District Judge. ( 4:23

- cv - 01894

- BHH )

Submitted : April 1 8 , 2024 Decided: April 19, 2024

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER , and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Julius Andrew Reason, III, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-7129 Doc: 7 Filed: 04/19/2024 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Julius Andrew Reason, III, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing without prejudice Reason’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in which he sought to challenge his convictions by way of the savings clause in 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (e) . In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in
Jones v. Hendrix , 599 U.S. 465, 477

- 80 (2023) (holding that petitioner cannot use § 2241 petition to mount successive collateral challenges to federal convictions or se ntence) , we conclude that Reason cannot pursue his c hallenges in a § 2241 petition. Accordingly, we
affirm the district court’s order. Reason v. Janson , No. 4:23

- cv - 01894

- BHH (D.S.C. Oct.
20 , 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 23-7129 Doc: 7 Filed: 04/19/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
www.gpo.gov

### §4357. Definitions

For purposes of this chapter—

(1) the term “Advisory Committee” means the Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic Documentation for the Department of State;

(2) the term “Historian” means the Historian of the Department of State or any successor officer of the Department of State responsible for carrying out the functions of the Office of the Historian, Bureau of Public Affairs, of the Department of State, as in effect on October 28, 1991;

(3) the term “originating agency” means, with respect to a record, the department, agency, or entity of the United States (or any officer or employee thereof of acting in his official capacity) that originates, develops, publishes, issues, or otherwise prepares that record or receives that record from outside the United States Government; and

(4) the term “record” includes any written material (including any document, memorandum, correspondence, statistical data, book, or other papers), map, photograph, machine readable material, or other documentary material, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by an agency of the United States Government under Federal law or in connection with the transaction of public business and preserved or appropriate for preservation by that agency or its legitimate successor as evidence of the organization, functions, policies, decisions, procedures, operations, or other activities of the Government or because of the informational value in them, and such term does not include library or museum material made or acquired and preserved solely for reference or exhibition purposes, any extra copy of a document preserved only for convenience of reference, or any stocks of publications or of processed documents.

(Aug. 1, 1956, ch. 841, title IV, §407, as added Pub. L. 102–138, title I, §198(a), Oct. 28, 1991, 105 Stat. 690.)

#### Authority of Secretary of State

Except as otherwise provided, Secretary of State to have and exercise any authority vested by law in any official or office of Department of State and references to such officials or offices deemed to refer to Secretary of State or Department of State, as appropriate, see section 2651a of this title and section 161(d) of Pub. L. 103–236, set out as a note under section 2651a of this title.
<PAGE>
                                                                  Exhibit 10.6.3

                        ALPHA SECURITY GROUP CORPORATION
                              328 West 77th Street
                            New York, New York 10024


                                                                February 8, 2007


Mr. Steven M. Wasserman
328 West 77th Street
New York, New York 10024

Dear Mr. Wasserman:

         By signing and dating this letter where indicated below, you hereby
agree with Alpha Security Group Corporation ("Alpha") as follows:

         1.       You shall loan to Alpha, upon Alpha's request, up to Two
                  Hundred Thousand ($200,000) Dollars (the "Loan"), in addition
                  to any and all sums previously advanced by you to Alpha, to be
                  utilized by Alpha for the payment of costs and expenses
                  associated with the offer and sale by Alpha of 6,000,000
                  shares of its common stock in a public offering underwritten
                  by Maxim Group LLC and I-Banker Securities, Inc. (the
                  "Offering").

         2.       No interest shall accrue on the unpaid principal balance of
                  the Loan.


         3.       The principal balance of this Loan shall be repayable within
                  ninety (90) days of the date on which Alpha consummates the
                  Offering, from interest earned on the trust account, as set
                  forth in the Registration Statement on Form S-1 relating to
                  the Offering.


         4.       This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and
                  enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of New York,
                  without regard to the principles of conflicts of laws.

         5.       Any provision contained in this Agreement which is prohibited
                  or unenforceable in any jurisdiction shall, as to such
                  jurisdiction, be ineffective to the extent of such prohibition
                  or unenforceability without invalidating the remaining
                  provisions hereof, and any such prohibition or
                  unenforceability in any jurisdiction shall not invalidate or
                  render unenforceable such provision in any other jurisdiction.


         6.       This agreement supercedes in its entirety that certain letter
                  agreement regarding the Loan dated January 12, 2007



                                                 ALPHA SECURITY GROUP
                                                 CORPORATION


                                                 By: /s/ Robert B. Blaha
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     Robert B. Blaha
                                                     Chief Management Officer
ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:


/s/ Steven M. Wasserman
-----------------------------
Steven M. Wasserman
Date: February 8, 2007
#### § 1028.400 General.

Operators of credit card systems are subject to the recordkeeping requirements set forth and cross referenced in this subpart. Operators of credit card systems should also refer to Subpart D of Part 1010 of this Chapter for recordkeeping requirements contained in that subpart which apply to operators of credit card systems.
39824.

#### BOZE v. ATLANTA VETERANS TRANSPORT, INC. et al.

Russell, Judge.

1. “Where a judge of the superior court signs a bill of exceptions as of a certain date, there is no provision of law for him to give a supplemental certificate as to the time when and the circumstances under which he signed the orig*91inal certificate, with a view to determining whether the bill of exceptions was tendered within the time required by law. By signing the first certificate the judge exhausts his power in that regard, and can not add a supplementary certificate explanatory of the first.” *Grant v. Southern Bell Tel. &c. Co.,*145 Ga. 298 (2) (89 SE 364) and citations.

Decided November 29, 1962.

*Ernest Bostick, Raymond R. Burgess,*for plaintiff in error.

*Nall, Miller, Cadenhead & Dennis, A. Paul Cadenhead, Thomas A. Rice, Hansell, Post, Brandon & Dorsey, Jule W. Felton, Jr., W. Dent Aeree,*contra.

2. Where the trial judge fails to sign the bill of exceptions within the time provided by law or within a reasonable time thereafter, and the party presenting it for certification takes no appropriate and available action to have him certify it sooner, and it does not appear from the certificate that the delay was not due to negligence or laches on the part of counsel for the movant, the delay must be considered inexcusable, and a timely motion to dismiss the writ of error must be granted. *Gilbert v. Moody,*209 Ga. 637 (74 SE2d 879) and cits.

The delay between the tender of the bill of exceptions to the trial judge and his signature on the certificate in *Gilbert*was 59 days; in the present case the delay consisted of 53 days. What may constitute a “reasonable time after” the 10 days allowed by law is not necessary to be decided here, because the time involved in the two cases is so nearly identical as to make the cited decision controlling on the question. It follows that the bill of exceptions must be

*Dismissed.*

*Carlisle,*P.«/., *and Eberhardt, J., concur.*