alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SECOND
                                  AMENDMENT TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


     This Second Amendment (the "Amendment") is made and entered into as of the
1st day of April, 1998 by and between WorldPort Communications, Inc., a Delaware
corporation ("WorldPort" or the "Company") and Mr. Paul A. Moore  ("Executive")
and amends that certain Employment Agreement dated as of January 1, 1998 between
the Company and Executive (the "Employment Agreement").

     WHEREAS, the parties executed an Amendment to Employment Agreement as of
March 31, 1998 (the "First Amendment") which amended Section 6(f) of the
Employment Agreement;

     WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend Section 6(a) and to again amend
Section 6(f) of the Employment Agreement;

     WHEREAS, all capitalized terms used by not defined herein shall have the
meanings given in the Employment Agreement;

     NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as
follows:

     1.   Section 6(a) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended and
restated to read in its entirety as follows:

          "(a)  Commencing on the date hereof, and during Executive's
     employment, the Company shall pay to the Executive an annual salary of
     $300,000 per annum.  The Board, in its sole discretion, may increase the
     annual salary of the Executive based upon satisfactory performance and the
     Executive's salary may be increased from time to time in accordance with
     normal business practices of the Company at the full discretion of the
     Board."

     2.   Section 6(f) of the Employment Agreement (as amended by the First
Amendment) is hereby amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows:

          "(f)  The Company shall issue to the Executive an aggregate of 125,000
     shares (the "Shares") of the Company's Series B Convertible Preferred
     Stock, par value $.0001 per share, in exchange for $5.36 per share.  The
     Executive shall pay $184,600 of the purchase price to the Company in cash
     and the remaining $485,400 shall be paid to the Company by delivery by the
     Executive of a promissory note.  The promissory note shall accrue interest
     at an annual rate of 9%, mature on August 1, 2000 and provide for monthly
     payments of principal and accrued interest beginning on September 1, 1998. 
     The promissory note shall be secured by a pledge to the Company of the
     Shares purchased by the Executive hereby."

     3.   Except as otherwise amended hereby, all terms and provisions of the
Employment Agreement shall continue in full force and effect as stated therein.


     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day
and year first above written.

                                   WORLDPORT COMMUNICATIONS, INC.


                                   By: 
                                   Name: 
                                   Title: 
                                   Paul A. Moore
#### § 48.4217-1 Lease considered as sale.

For purposes of Chapter 32 of the Code, the lease of an article by a manufacturer, producer, or importer shall be considered a sale of the article. The term “lease” means a contract or agreement, written or verbal, which gives the lessee an exclusive, continuous right to the possession or use of a particular article for a period of time. The term includes any renewal or extension of a lease or any subsequent lease of the article. However, in the case of the lease of an automobile the sale of which by the manufacturer would be taxable under section 4064, the term includes only the first lease (excluding any renewal or extension of the lease) of such automobile by the manufacturer.

[T.D. 7536, 43 FR 13521, Mar. 31, 1978, as amended by T.D. 8036, 50 FR 29963, July 23, 1985]
§ 20.200 What must I do to comply with this part? There are two general requirements if you are a recipient other than an individual. ( a ) First, you must make a good faith effort, on a continuing basis, to maintain a drug-free workplace. You must agree to do so as a condition for receiving any award covered by this part. The specific measures that you must take in this regard are described in more detail in subsequent sections of this subpart. Briefly, those measures are to— ( 1 ) Publish a drug-free workplace statement and establish a drug-free awareness program for your employees (see §§ 20.205 through 20.220); and
( 2 ) Take actions concerning employees who are convicted of violating drug statutes in the workplace (see § 20.225).
( b ) Second, you must identify all known workplaces under your Federal awards (see § 20.230).
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1051

AN ACT

To provide for the extension of certain hydroelectric projects

located in the State of West Virginia.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the time period

5 specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16

6 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to Federal Energy

7 Regulatory Commission projects numbered 6901 and
2

•HR 1051 EH

1 6902, the Commission shall, upon the request of the li2 censee for those projects, in accordance with the good

3 faith, due diligence, and public interest requirements of

4 that section, the Commission’s procedures under that sec5 tion, and the procedures specified in that section, extend

6 the time period during which the licensee is required to

7 commence construction of those projects so as to termi8 nate on October 3, 1999.

9 (b) APPLICABILITY.—Subsection (a) shall take effect

10 for the projects upon the expiration of the extension, is11 sued by the Commission under section 13 of the Federal

12 Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806), of the period required for

13 commencement of construction of the projects.

14 (c) REINSTATEMENT OF EXPIRED LICENSE.—If a li15 cense for a project described in subsection (a) has expired

16 prior to the date of enactment of this Act, the Commission

17 shall reinstate the license effective as of the date of its

18 expiration and extend the time required for commence19 ment of construction of the project until October 3, 1999.

Passed the House of Representatives November 13,

1995.

Attest:

Clerk.

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1051

AN ACT

To provide for the extension of certain hydroelectric

projects located in the State of West Virginia.
----

Order of the President of the Court of 22 November 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-216/06) (1)

(2006/C 331/55)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

----

(1)OJ C 165, 15.7.2006.

----
July 2, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

HERITAGE OPERATING, L.P., Appellant

NO. 14-14-00187-CV V.

BARBER HILL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT; CHAMBERS COUNTY,

AND THE CITY OF MONT BELVIEU, Appellees

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Barber Hill 

Independent School District; Chambers County, and the City of Mont Belvieu, 

signed February 6, 2014, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have 

inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of 

the court below AFFIRMED.

We order appellant, Heritage Operating, L.P., to pay all costs incurred in this 

appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
### MA**TERIA LS NOT INCLUDED IN** 

**AI RWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (A**  **D) DOCKET**

FAA - 2012 - 0177 Docket Number

2009 - SW - 59 - AD Directorate Identifier Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained

in the Supplemental AD Docket Emerge ncy Alert Service Bulletin No. 04A009, Revision 1, dated June 24, 2009 Alert Service Bulletin No. 25 - 095, dated June 25, 2009
**MA Y BE VIEWED AT:**  Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region Rules Docket 2601 Meacham Blvd., R oom 663 Fort W orth, Texas 76137 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002



---

In connection with the Quarterly Report of HQ Sustainable Maritime Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jean-Pierre Dallaire, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 11, 2006



/s/ Jean-Pierre DallaireJean-Pierre DallairePrincipal Financial and Accounting Officer
_______________________________________ __ 

# Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

October 4, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 129880(76) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver INTERNATIONAL UNION UNITED Marilyn Kelly AUTOMOBILE AEROSPACE & Maura D. Corrigan AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA and UN ITED BROADCASTING NETWORK, INC.,Plaintiffs-CounterdefendantsRobert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

Appellants,

v SC: 129880 COA: 248412 Washtenaw CC: 97-008442-CB HELEN DORSEY, PAT CHOATE, and EDWARD MILLER,Defendants-Counterplaintiffs/ThirdParty Plaintiffs-Appellees, and

KAY CASEY, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and

DANIEL SHERRICK, R OY WYSE, and JOYCE FRANK, Third-Party Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for re consideration of this Court’s March 29, 2006 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

T AYLOR , C.J., concurs and states as follows:

This Court reversed the Court of Appeals “for the reason s stated in the partial dissent” at the Court of Appeals (emphasis a dded). Defendants have filed affidavits and a docket sheet which call into question one of the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals partial dissent. I concur with the order denying the motion for reconsideration because the second reason stated in th e Court of Appeals partial disse nt is an independent reason supporting our earlier reversal of the Court of Appeals.

d0927 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 4, 2006

Clerk
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6548** 

FRANK FURTICK, JR. , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. WARDEN OF LEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION , Respondent

– Appellee, and
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA , Respondent.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Anderson

. Mary G. Lewis , District Judge. ( 8:13

- cv - 00079

- MGL )

Submitted : August 28, 2014 Decided: September 3, 2014

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Frank Furtick, Jr. , Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Senior Assistant Attorney General , William Edgar Salter, III , Assistant Attorney General , Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee

.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Frank Furtick, Jr. , seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrati ng that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court de nies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Furtick has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal4 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 54 (Tuesday, March 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16316-16317]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6737]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7811]

Shipping Coordinating Committee; Notice of Committee Meeting

    The Shipping Coordinating Committee (SHC) will conduct an open 
meeting at 9:30 a.m. on Tuesday, April 24, 2012, in Room 6103 of the 
United States Coast Guard Headquarters Building, 2100 Second Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20593-0001. The primary purpose of the meeting is 
to prepare for the forty-third Session of the International Maritime 
Organization's (IMO) Sub-Committee on Standards of Training and 
Watchkeeping (STW) to be held at the IMO Headquarters, United Kingdom, 
April 30-May 4, 2012.
    The primary matters to be considered include:
    Validation of model training courses.
    Development of an e-navigation strategy implementation plan.
    Development of training standards for recovery systems.
    Preparation of guidelines for the implementation of the medical 
standards of the 2010 amendments.
    Development of guidance for the implementation of the 2010 Manila 
amendments.
    Role of the human element.
    Members of the public may attend this meeting up to the seating 
capacity of the room. To facilitate the building security process, and 
to request reasonable accommodation, those who plan to attend should 
contact the meeting coordinator, Ms. Zoe Goss, by email at 
zoe.a.goss@uscg.mil, by phone

[[Page 16317]]

at (202) 372-1425, by fax at (202) 372-1926, or in writing at 
Commandant (CG-52), U.S. Coast Guard, 2100 2nd Street, SW., Stop 7126, 
Washington, DC 20593-7126 not later than April 17, 2012, 7 days prior 
to the meeting. Requests made after April 17, 2012 might not be able to 
be accommodated. Please note that due to security considerations, two 
valid, government issued photo identifications must be presented to 
gain entrance to the Headquarters building. The Headquarters building 
is accessible by taxi and privately owned conveyance (public 
transportation is not generally available). However, parking in the 
vicinity of the building is extremely limited. Additional information 
regarding this and other IMO SHC public meetings may be found at: 
www.uscg.mil/imo.

    Dated: March 9, 2012.
Brian Robinson,
Executive Secretary, Shipping Coordinating Committee, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 2012-6737 Filed 3-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-09-P
```
#### § 57.9 Refund claims.

Any claim for a refund of the fee must be made by the entity that paid the fee to the government and must be made on Form 843, “Claim for Refund and Request for Abatement,” in accordance with the instructions for that form.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 19 (Friday, January 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 5677]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1977]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 731-TA-1146-1147 (Final)]


1-Hydroxyethylidene-1,1-Diphosphonic Acid (HEDP) From China and 
India

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Revised schedule for the subject investigations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: Effective Date: January 15, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nathanael Comly (202-205-3174), Office 
of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain 
information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal 
on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need 
special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact 
the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information 
concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its 
internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). The public record for these 
investigations may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket 
(EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Effective October 21, 2008, the Commission 
established a schedule for the conduct of the final phase of the 
subject investigations (73 FR 67545, November 14, 2008). As a result of 
subsequent events, however, the Commission is revising its schedule.
    The Commission's new schedule for the investigations is as follows: 
The Commission will make its final release of information on March 30, 
2009; and final party comments are due on April 1, 2009.
    For further information concerning these investigations see the 
Commission's notice cited above and the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and 
part 207, subparts A and C (19 CFR part 207).

    Authority: These investigations are being conducted under 
authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is 
published pursuant to section 207.21 of the Commission's rules.

    By order of the Commission.
    Issued: January 15, 2009.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
 [FR Doc. E9-1977 Filed 1-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 18 (Thursday, January 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 5206]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1930]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Delegation of Authority No. 322]


Re-Delegation From the Deputy Secretary of State of Certain 
Authorities Vested in the Under Secretary for Economic, Energy and 
Agricultural Affairs

    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of State by the 
laws of the United States, including Section 1 of the State Department 
Basic Authorities Act (22 U.S.C. 2651a), and delegated to me by 
Delegation of Authority 245, dated April 23, 2001, I hereby delegate to 
the Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for the Bureau of 
Economic, Energy, and Business Affairs, to the extent authorized by 
law, all authorities vested in the Under Secretary of State for 
Economic, Energy and Agricultural Affairs, including all authorities 
vested in the Secretary of State that have been or may be delegated or 
redelegated to that Under Secretary.
    Any authorities covered by this delegation are also hereby 
delegated to the Deputy Secretary for Management and Resources, the 
Under Secretary for Political Affairs and the Under Secretary for 
Management, and may also be exercised by the Secretary and the Deputy 
Secretary. Nothing in this delegation of authority shall be deemed to 
supersede any existing delegation of authority, which shall remain in 
full force and effect during and after this delegation.
    This delegation shall become effective at noon on January 20, 2009, 
and shall expire upon the appointment and entry upon duty of a 
subsequently appointed individual to serve as Under Secretary for 
Economic, Energy and Agricultural Affairs.
    This memorandum shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: January 16, 2009.
John D. Negroponte,
Deputy Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. E9-1930 Filed 1-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-13-0018

SAT Date: 10/23/2012

Print Date: 12/6/2012

Related cases:

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1-2 2

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

2 12

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Drinking Water Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: CARDIO, BLOOD, BONE, ONCO-BONE, DEVEL, KIDNEY, 

MUSCLE, AQUATOX-A,C

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-13-0018

FATE: 

Solid with MP = 348 C (E)

log Kow = -14.8 (E) 

S > 10 g/L at 25 C (E)

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

log Koc = 3.57 (E)

log Fish BCF = 0.50 (E)
log Fish BAF = -0.05 (E) 

POTW removal (%) = 0-25 via biodeg

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = moderate

PBT Potential: P2B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = moderate

 Health:

 Health Summary: Not absorbed from the skin, absorbed from the lung, 

absorbed from the GI tract (pchem). 

Concern for blood toxicity, cardio toxicity, inhibited muscle functioning, bone 

toxicity, bone cancer, developmental toxicity, and kidney toxicity based on chelation potential 

and analogs, such as, 

Low moderate concern.

 Test Data: (-) Salmonella with and without activation; (-) E. coli 

with and without activation;

no skin sensitization in guinea pigs using the Magnusson-Kligman assay

rat developmental toxicity test via the oral route with doses = 1000, 400, and 100 mg/kg/d with 

NOEL = 100 mg/kg/d based on no reported effects at this dose; LOEL = 400 mg/kg/d based on 

skeletal retardation; more severe and significant effects at 1000 mg/kg/d;

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 >100

daphnid 48-h LC50 >100

green algal 96-h EC50 5.2

fish _ chronic value >10

daphnid _ chronic 

value

>10

algal _ chronic 

value

2.0

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SAR-nearest analog method for 

 MW 459; solid (P) with 

mp = unk °C (P); S > 450 g/L at 20 C (M); pH7; effective concentrations based on 100% active 

ingredients and nominal concentrations; DWhardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and DWTOC 

<2.0 mg/L;
Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

200

SARs

SAR Class

Ecotox Category 

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: Becky Jones