alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                           GTECH HOLDINGS CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of GTECH Holdings Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending November 26, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the Date hereof (the "Report"), I, W.
Bruce Turner, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: January 4, 2006                      /s/ W. Bruce Turner
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           W. Bruce Turner
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
OFFICEOFl-HEATfORN~ GENERALOF**AUSTIN**

RonorablsQeorgeB. Sh8ppard CctmptPolle~

0r Public**Aot3oImta** AUUtAn, Taca6

near 8lr: oplnlcul Ho. o-4014 Rer Does the groas reoaiptstax leviedby ArtloleX. B. B. 8,
on nev radiorapply to the prooeedu fPem the 8alo of the entire ooetblnation 8et or only to that POPtlon PepParented**by** the sale of the radio?

we ar8 in reoelptOS ycmr letter o? 8epteabor, 17, l!J'U, vhiah i8 as ?ollovst

th%S dO&nU'tWllt

ilth eePteilISUdi0 dealeM U to Vh&hOPS OglbiartiO!l I&i, tb&18,8 l'8db-@CliW,
**orar8dla-~-~aOrd~~rr** orszud&O-phOJlOreoord ohanger-reoordw shouldbe hued upon the full 8mount reeaetved for the **80@8t~** odplbirtcrtlon orvhether the tax ahouldapply only to the mount OF prooesdrrecalvod fer the mdio in thr oembinw tiOll 8Ot. I&t%U

the iniO?sU6tiOll

giVSUi thi8 dOpaPtmoat, the set is sold as a aoauplete unit and the prliae i8 not broken dovm a8 to whet portien Of the rebkiptei&for the radio. Ammtber 0r rsdio dealer8 81% OOntendingth8t thi8 tax vould not loOru8
on the anttrepmceeds. We we thereforerequmt- ,.Ilg JrOUr OplniOIl

a8 t0 Vh&WP thr iMU am1108 t0 the proceeds frcm!

the rale of the 8ntlFs oombinatiG%l set OF VhOth8P it em1198 OlirJ t0 thatpOrti0lS X'OpFO8ented

by the UtiQ 0f the PPd%O."HonorableCoorge Ii. shoppard,P8ge 2

UpOn thi8 8filbtO

Of fkWt8yOU 8UkdU%t the fOlloU~ qW8tiOnt

DQO8 th8 -088 P%WiptCbt4IX 1Wbd by Al%iOl*x Of Eouse Bill 8, on new radios apply to the proceed8iram the **8618 or**  thb entire aombiartlOn8Ot 

### or only to tb8t portiOn rSpm8Onted by the 8ale Of the radio?

section 1, of Artiole 7047-1, **ROVi8ed** gtatUte80r !hexIII,

being m%Oie X Or IiOU80 Bill 8 Of th6 47th hgiSi&tWO, provld~san follovsr

"'IWoh PeX'rOZL,

mnhip, a8800i8ttioll, Or oorpor8tlon88lllagatmtall new F6dlor 

### or x18w 008WtiO8, 8ha11 make i$ltbl'tWly Oilth8 ftF8t 6578 of January,

### April,July uui October of uoh year, a report to the Comptroller, wxdec +2x of th8 

### ovwr, manager, oc If a oorparation, an officer thW3Of, 8hOViI3gi&# 4SggPOg9tO gr088 WWipt8 AXE the 8a8 0fq0r th0ab0~-2~4~d ~~CIIU r0rth8 qwrtesnextpmoedlngt and8hallatthe 888OtilR8 .prytot.ha cemptrolleFal~exolBa tJbxoqmlt0 tvo (2)

### par sent of **aaid** -88 Nwlpt8 88 8hovn by aaid report ."

v8 iLOt* **iroap JWUl** **’ letkl**  **tbot YOU**  **8ay, %lWlB**  **tfu in**  fOI'58tiOn giVOXi t&$8 mt, ths Set 18 8old 60 0 OUQl&O unit 8nd the prior 18 not bMcen dovn e8 to vhat pOrtion **0s** the **lWWtpt8** 18 h' th@ l'UitO.* m hing th0 WM **it** 18 Ooc OpiniOXtpnd YOU aF8 80 dV18ti that th0 tax k&.crd w BOOtbX& 1 **Of** Ax'tlols

X **Of** Hourr.

Bill 8 8hOUld b0 pald M th0 bM18 Of the proueedsderived fraa the eale of the entire eombinetlrm 88t.
IB

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 50

JOINT RESOLUTION

To designate the visitor center at the Channel Islands National Park, California, as the ‘‘Robert J. Lagomarsino

Visitor Center’’.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The visitor center at the Channel Islands National

5 Park, California, is designated as the ‘‘Robert J. Lago6 marsino Visitor Center’’.
2

•HJ 50 EH

1 SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in any law, regulation, document,

3 record, map, or other paper of the United States to the

4 visitor center referred to in section 1 is deemed to be a

5 reference to the ‘‘Robert J. Lagomarsino Visitor Center’’.

Passed the House of Representatives February 1,

1995.

Attest:

Clerk.

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 50

JOINT RESOLUTION

To designate the visitor center at the Channel IsJ. Lagomarsino Visitor Center’’. lands National Park, California, as the ‘‘Robert
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1129

AN ACT

To amend the National Trails System Act to desa National Historic Trail. ignate the route from Selma to Montgomery as
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1129

AN ACT

To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the

route from Selma to Montgomery as a National Historic

Trail.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 5(a) of the National Trails System Act (16
2

•HR 1129 EH

1 U.S.C. 1244(a)) is amended by adding at the end thereof

2 the following new paragraph:

3 ‘‘( ) The Selma to Montgomery National Historic

4 Trail, consisting of 54 miles of city streets and United

5 States Highway 80 from Brown Chapel A.M.E. Church

6 in Selma to the State Capitol Building in Montgomery,

7 Alabama, traveled by voting rights advocates during

8 March 1965 to dramatize the need for voting rights legis9 lation, as generally described in the report of the Secretary

10 of the Interior prepared pursuant to subsection (b) of this

11 section entitled ‘Selma to Montgomery’ and dated April

12 1993. Maps depicting the route shall be on file and avail13 able for public inspection in the Office of the National

14 Park Service, Department of the Interior. The trail shall

15 be administered in accordance with this Act, including sec16 tion 7(h). The Secretary of the Interior, acting through

17 the National Park Service, which shall be the lead Federal

18 agency, shall cooperate with other Federal, State and local

19 authorities to preserve historic sites along the route, in-
3

•HR 1129 EH

1 cluding (but not limited to) the Edmund Pettus Bridge

2 and the Brown Chapel A.M.E. Church.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives May 14, 1996.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Enrique Zayas, Appellant.

[804 NYS2d 812]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flaherty, J), rendered May 14, 2001, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, criminal mischief in the third degree, possession of burglar’s tools, and resisting arrest, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel claiming, inter alia, that his attorney in the Supreme Court did not move for a pretrial hearing to determine whether statements he made to the police were voluntary, and he did not request an instruction charging the jurors to consider the voluntariness of his statements. The defendant also asserts that he was wrongly sentenced as a persistent violent felony offender because, inter alia, the court did not warn him that his pleas of guilty in the prior cases might be used to enhance his sentence if he were to commit a felony in the future.

Viewed in its totality (see *People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]), the defendant was afforded effective assistance of counsel at trial.

The defendant’s contention that he was wrongly sentenced is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, is without merit *(see People v Sullivan,*153 AD2d 223, 232 [1990]; *People v Depeyster,*115 AD2d 613 [1985]). Crane, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein and Lifson, JJ, concur.
40090.

#### MANGHAM v. HOTEL & RESTAURANT SUPPLY COMPANY.

Franicum, Judge.

Where one person executes and delivers to another separate and distinct promissory notes, each note constitutes a separate and distinct cause of action, and after maturity of all the notes the payee may bring separate suits upon them, or he may exercise the privilege of joinder accorded by *’Code*§ 3-113, and sue upon all of the notes in one action. *Parris v. Hightower,*76 Ga. 631 (2); *Starnes v. Mutual Loan &c. Co.,*102 Ga. 597, 598 (5) (29 SE 452); *International Agric. Corp. v. Powell,*31 Ga. App. 348, 349 (5) (120 SE 668); *Morrow v. Fitzpatrick,*34 Ga. App. 801 (131 SE 189). Therefore, the defendant’s plea in which he contended that the plaintiff’s suit upon a promissory note in this case was barred because the plaintiff had previously sued him on *883two other promissory notes at a time when the note sued upon in this case was “past due”; and that the failure of the plaintiff to include in the previous action the note sued upon in this case amounted to splitting a cause of action, set up no valid defense, and the court did not err in dismissing the plea (it being the only defense filed) and in rendering judgment in favor of the plaintiff. *Lawrence v. Stephens,*20 Ga. App. 279 (92 SE 952).

Decided June 4, 1963.

*Claude Hambrick,*for plaintiff in error.

*Sam G. Dettelbach,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.*
#### In the Matter of Maria Velasquez, Appellant, v Tino Hernandez, as Chair of the New York City Housing Authority, et al., Respondents.

[806 NYS2d 474]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marylin G. Diamond, J), entered August 23, 2004, which denied petitioner’s application to annul respondent Housing Authority’s determi*314nation terminating petitioner’s tenancy upon her third default in appearing at an administrative hearing, and directed the Clerk to dismiss the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

No basis exists to disturb respondent’s summary rejection of the same excuse petitioner had used a year earlier in vacating her second default (see *Matter of Daniels v Popolizio,*171 AD2d 596 [1991]), namely, that she did not have a mailbox key and did not retrieve the hearing notice until after the scheduled hearing date. As the application court noted, petitioner did not explain how she could have gone without access to her mailbox for so long, or suggest that she did not receive other mailings from respondent, including the Hearing Officer’s decision vacating her second default. We have considered petitioner’s other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Friedman, J.P., Sullivan, Nardelli, Williams and Sweeny, JJ.
# L_2021309DE.01003601.xml

| 2.9.2021 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 309/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2021

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 309/36

---

Berichtigung der Delegierten Verordnung (EU) 2019/2018 der Kommission vom 11. März 2019 zur Ergänzung der Verordnung (EU) 2017/1369 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates im Hinblick auf die Energieverbrauchskennzeichnung von Kühlgeräten mit Direktverkaufsfunktion

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 315 vom 5. Dezember 2019
  )

Auf Seite 174, in Anhang IV, Tabelle 4, erhält der Eintrag für „Horizontale Kühlschränke für Supermärkte“ folgende Fassung:

| „Horizontale Kühlschränke für Supermärkte | M2 | ≤ +7 | ≥ –1 | n.a. | 1,00 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| H1 and H2 | ≤ +10 | ≥ –1 | n.a. | 0,92 |
| M1 | ≤ +5 | ≥ –1 | n.a. | 1,08“ |

„Horizontale Kühlschränke für Supermärkte

M2

≤ +7

≥ –1

n.a.

1,00

H1 and H2

≤ +10

≥ –1

n.a.

0,92

M1

≤ +5

≥ –1

n.a.

1,08“

---
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1078

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for coverage

of beta interferons approved by the FDA for self-administration for

treatment of multiple sclerosis under the Medicare program, and for

other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 28, 1995

Mr. LAFALCE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce and, in addition, to the Committees on Ways and

Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide

for coverage of beta interferons approved by the FDA

for self-administration for treatment of multiple sclerosis

under the Medicare program, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Multiple Sclerosis

5 Home Treatment Act of 1995’’.
2

HR 1078 IH

1 SEC. 2. COVERAGE AND PAYMENT OF SELF-ADMINISTERED

2 BETASERON UNDER MEDICARE.

3 Section 1861(s)(2) of the Social Security Act (42

4 U.S.C. 1395x(s)(2)) is amended—

5 (1) By striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of subpara6 graph (P);

7 (2) By striking the period at the end of sub8 paragraph (Q) and adding in lieu thereof, ‘‘; and’’;

9 and

10 (3) By adding at the end the following new sub11 paragraph:

12 ‘‘(R) beta interferons approved by the Food and

13 Drug Administration (FDA) for self-administration

14 by patients with multiple sclerosis competent to use

15 such biological without medical supervision with re16 spect to the administration of such biological, sub17 ject to methods and standards established by the

18 Secretary by regulation for the safe and effective use

19 of beta interferons.’’

20 SEC. 3. REGULATIONS.

21 The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall

22 issue final regulations setting forth standards and meth23 ods for safe and effective use of beta interferons for pur24 poses of payments under section 2 of this Act. The Sec25 retary shall issue such regulations not later than 150 days

26 after the date of enactment of this Act for any beta
3

HR 1078 IH

1 interferon approved by the FDA on or before the date of

2 enactment of this Act, and not later than 60 days after

3 the date of approval for any beta interferon approved by

4 the FDA after the date of enactment of this Act.

5 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

6 The amendments made by section 2 of this Act shall

7 apply to payments for items and services furnished on or

8 after October 1, 1995.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1082 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1082

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that certain cash 
rentals of farmland will not cause recapture of the special estate tax 
                               valuation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 28, 1995

 Mr. Roberts introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that certain cash 
rentals of farmland will not cause recapture of the special estate tax 
                               valuation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN CASH RENTALS OF FARMLAND NOT TO CAUSE RECAPTURE OF 
              SPECIAL ESTATE TAX VALUATION.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (c) of section 2032A of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to tax treatment of dispositions and 
failures to use for qualified use) is amended by adding at the end 
thereof the following new paragraph:
            ``(8) Certain cash rental not to cause recapture.--For 
        purposes of this subsection, a qualified heir shall not be 
        treated as failing to use property in a qualified use solely 
        because such heir rents such property on a net cash basis to a 
        member of the decedent's family, but only if, during the period 
        of the lease, such member of the decedent's family uses such 
        property in a qualified use.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to rentals occurring after December 31, 1976.
                                 <all>
```
IA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 127

Proposing a religious liberties amendment to the Constitution of the United

States to secure the people’s right to acknowledge God according to

the dictates of conscience.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 28, 1995

Mr. ISTOOK (for himself, Mr. BACHUS, Mr. BAKER of California, Mr.

BALLENGER, Mr. BARR of Georgia, Mr. BARRETT of Nebraska, Mr. BARTON of Texas, Mr. BLILEY, Mr. BONILLA, Mr. BUNNING of Kentucky,

Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. CALLAHAN, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mrs.

CHENOWETH, Mr. CHRISTENSEN, Mr. CHRYSLER, Mr. COBLE, Mr.

COBURN, Mr. COLLINS of Georgia, Mr. CONDIT, Mr. COOLEY, Mr.

CRANE, Mr. CRAPO, Mrs. CUBIN, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Mr. DEAL of Georgia, Mr. DICKEY, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. DORNAN, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. EMERSON, Mr. EVERETT, Mr. FORBES, Mr. FUNDERBURK, Mr. GRAHAM,

Mr. GUTKNECHT, Mr. HALL of Texas, Mr. HANCOCK, Mr. HANSEN, Mr.

HASTERT, Mr. HAYWORTH, Mr. HEFLEY, Mr. HEINEMAN, Mr. HERGER,

Mr. HILLEARY, Mr. HUNTER, Mr. INGLIS of South Carolina, Mr. SAM

JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. JONES, Mr. KASICH, Mr. KIM, Mr. KINGSTON,

Mr. LARGENT, Mr. LAUGHLIN, Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky, Mr. LIGHTFOOT,

Mr. LINDER, Mr. LIVINGSTON, Mr. LUCAS, Mr. MCCOLLUM, Mr.

MCCRERY, Mr. MCHUGH, Mr. MCINTOSH, Mr. MCNULTY, Mr. MONTGOMERY, Mr. MOORHEAD, Mr. MYERS of Indiana, Mrs. MYRICK, Mr.

NORWOOD, Mr. OXLEY, Mr. PACKARD, Mr. PARKER, Mr. PAXON, Mr.

POMBO, Mr. RADANOVICH, Mr. RAHALL, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr.

ROHRABACHER, Mr. ROTH, Mr. SCARBOROUGH, Mr. SKEEN, Mr. SMITH

of New Jersey, Mrs. SMITH of Washington, Mr. SMITH of Michigan, Mr.

SOLOMON, Mr. SPENCE, Mr. STEARNS, Mr. STENHOLM, Mr. STOCKMAN,

Mr. TATE, Mr. TAUZIN, Mr. TAYLOR of North Carolina, Mr. TAYLOR of

Mississippi, Mr. TIAHRT, Mr. TRAFICANT, Mrs. VUCANOVICH, Mr. WAMP,

Mr. WATTS of Oklahoma, Mr. WHITFIELD, Mr. WICKER, Mr. YOUNG of

Florida, and Mr. YOUNG of Alaska) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
2

•HJ 127 IH

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing a religious liberties amendment to the Constitution

of the United States to secure the people’s right to

acknowledge God according to the dictates of conscience.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the follow4 ing article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitu5 tion of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents

6 and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by

7 the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States with8 in seven years after the date of its submission for ratifica9 tion:

10 ‘‘ARTICLE —

11 ‘‘To secure the people’s right to acknowledge God ac12 cording to the dictates of conscience: Nothing in this Con13 stitution shall prohibit acknowledgments of the religious

14 heritage, beliefs, or traditions of the people, or prohibit

15 student-sponsored prayer in public schools. Neither the

16 United States nor any State shall compose any official

17 prayer or compel joining in prayer, or discriminate against

18 religious expression or belief.’’.

Æ
#### § 1022.420 Additional records to be maintained by providers and sellers of prepaid access.

With respect to transactions relating to providers and sellers of prepaid access described in § 1010.100(ff)(4) and (7) that are subject to the requirements of this chapter, each provider of prepaid access shall maintain access to transactional records for a period of five years. The provider of prepaid access, as defined in § 1010.100(ff)(4), shall maintain access to transactional records generated in the ordinary course of business that would be needed to reconstruct prepaid access activation, loads, reloads, purchases, withdrawals, transfers, or other prepaid-related transactions.

[76 FR 45420, July 29, 2011]
Amendment No. 2 to the Unified Grocers, Inc. Employee Savings Plan



 Exhibit 10.3 
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 
 TO THE 

UNIFIED GROCERS, INC. 
 EMPLOYEE SAVINGS PLAN 
 Unified Grocers, Inc. (the “Company”)
hereby amends the above-named plan (the “Plan”), effective (except as otherwise provided below) as of the Effective Date, as defined in the Plan document, dated December 30, 2010, as follows: 

1. The following new sentence is added to the end of Section 3.7(e) of the Plan: 

“In addition, in accordance with the Regulations, Deemed Elective Contributions and Additional Contributions cannot be taken into
account for a Plan Year for a Non-Highly Compensated Employee to the extent such contributions exceed the product of the Non-Highly Compensated Employee’s Compensation and the greater of 5% or two times the Plan’s representative
contribution rate.” 
 2. The following new sentence is added to the end of Section 3.8(f)(vii): 

“In addition, in accordance with the Regulations, any such contributions cannot be taken into account for an applicable year for a
Non-Highly Compensated Employee to the extent such contributions exceed the product of such Non-Highly Compensated Employee’s Compensation and the greater of 5% or two times the Plan’s representative contribution rate.” 

3. Subsection (i) of Section 6.7(e) of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 

“(i) $20,000 (before April 1, 2011) or $50,000 (after March 31, 2011), reduced, in either case, by the
excess (if any) of (A) the highest outstanding balance of all loans from the Trust to such Participant during the one-year period ending on the day before the date on which such loan is made, over (B) the outstanding balance of all loans
from the Trust to such Participant on the date on which such loan is made; or” 
 4. Subsection (ii) of
Section 6.9(a) of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 
 “(ii) the current
value of such Participant’s Deferred Income Account (excluding any Deemed Elective Contributions or Additional Contributions); or” 
 5. The fourth sentence of Section 7.3(b) of the Plan is amended by deleting the reference to “separation from service” and replacing it with “severance from employment.”

 * * * * * 

  
 -1-









 The Company has caused this Amendment No. 2 to be signed on the date indicated below,
to be effective as indicated above. 
  

					
		  	“Company”
		
		  	UNIFIED GROCERS, INC.
			
	 Dated: May 7, 2012
	  	By:	 	 /s/ Robert M. Ling, Jr.

			
		  	Its:	 	    President


  
 -2-