alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Cement 

LAFARGE NORTH AMERICA INC. 

12950 Worldgate Dr. Suite 500, Herndon, VA 20170 

(703)480-3600 

June 15, 2010 

Ms. Charlene Spells 

Natural Resource and Commerce Group 

Sector Policies and Programs Division (E-143-03) 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

Re: Request for Extension to the Comment Period for Proposed CISWI Rule 

Dear Ms. Spells 

Lafarge North America (Lafarge) is requesting an extension to the proposed rule entitled “Standards of

Performance for New Stationary Sources and Emission Guidelines for Existing Sources: Commercial 

and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units; Proposed Rule” which as published in the Federal Register 

on Friday, June 4, 2010. 

Lafarge is aware that EPA has extended the proposed comment period from 45 days to 60 days in a 

subsequent Federal Register notification. However, 60 days is still not ample time to adequately review a 

rulemaking with such far-reaching effects to Lafarge, the entire cement industry, and several other 

impacted industries. EPA has been working on developing this rulemaking since the 2007 vacatur of the

2005 rule. In this period, EPA has had the opportunity to evaluate a significant volume of information 

that went into its reasoning for developing this proposal. To provide the public only 60 days to review 

all of the information that EPA evaluated for nearly 3 years, and prepare relevant comments does not 

seem appropriate or reasonable. 

In addition to this rulemaking, Lafarge and the cement industry is actively working on several other rules 

underway at EPA. The resources necessary to manage and coordinate the comments and data collection 

obligations for these rules is enormous. Therefore, Lafarge requests that EPA extend the current 60-day 

comment period to at least 90 days to allow for a reasonable time to properly assess this rulemaking. 

Thank you for considering our views on this matter. If you have any questions, please contact me at 

(816) 251-2122 or by e-mail at michael.pelan@lafarge-na.com. 

Respectfully, 

Michael L. Pelan 

Regional Environmental Manager 

Lafarge North America – Cement Division
#### § 31.3211-3 Employee representative supplemental tax.

See paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of § 31.3221-3 for rules applicable to the supplemental tax for each work-hour for which compensation is paid to an employee representative for services rendered as an employee representative.

[T.D. 8525, 59 FR 9666, Mar. 1, 1994]
IV

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 153

Authorizing the use of the Capitol grounds for the Greater Washington

Soap Box Derby.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 22, 1996

Mr. HOYER (for himself, Mrs. MORELLA, Mr. WYNN, Ms. NORTON, Mr.

WOLF, Mr. MORAN, and Mr. DAVIS) submitted the following concurrent

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and

Infrastructure

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of the Capitol grounds for the Greater

Washington Soap Box Derby.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF SOAP BOX DERBY RACES

4 ON CAPITOL GROUNDS.

5 The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby Associa6 tion (hereinafter in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘As7 sociation’’) shall be permitted to sponsor a public event,

8 soap box derby races, on the Capitol grounds on July 13,

9 1996, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House
2

•HCON 153 IH

1 of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the

2 Senate may jointly designate.

3 SEC. 2. CONDITIONS.

4 The event to be carried out under this resolution shall

5 be free of admission charge to the public and arranged

6 not to interfere with the needs of Congress, under condi7 tions to be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol and

8 the Capitol Police Board; except that the Association shall

9 assume full responsibility for all expenses and liabilities

10 incident to all activities associated with the event.

11 SEC. 3. STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.

12 For the purposes of this resolution, the Association

13 is authorized to erect upon the Capitol grounds, subject

14 to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, such stage,

15 sound amplification devices, and other related structures

16 and equipment as may be required for the event to be car17 ried out under this resolution.

18 SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

19 The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police

20 Board are authorized to make any such additional ar21 rangements that may be required to carry out the event

22 under this resolution.

Æ
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Christopher Pagan, Appellant.

[805 NYS2d 557]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Ohlig, J), rendered May 25, 1999, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The factual findings and credibility determinations of a hearing court are entitled to great deference on appeal and will not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(People v Cameron,*6 AD3d 546 [2004]; *People v Chapman,*277 AD2d 392 [2000]). The record supports the County Court’s determination to credit the police officer’s testimony, which indicated that there was probable cause for the search of the defendant’s vehicle *(see People v Torres,*74 NY2d 224 [1989]; *People v Blasich,*73 NY2d 673 [1989]; *People v Goldring,*186 AD2d 675 [1992]). Consequently, the County Court properly denied that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Krausman and Covello, JJ., concur.
§ 48.6427-6 Limitation on credit or refund of tax paid on fuel used in intercity, local or school buses after July 31, 1984. ( a ) *Limitation on amount of credit or refund* — ( 1 ) *In general.* In the case of fuel sold or used after July 31, 1984, on which tax was imposed under section 4041(a), the amount of credit or refund under section 6427(b)(1) shall not exceed 12 cents per gallon except where fuel is used in a bus while such bus is being operated as a “qualified local bus” in which case the credit or refund shall be the full amount of tax paid under section 4041(a) on such fuel.
( 2 ) *Qualified local bus.* A bus is considered to be operated as a “qualified local bus” if such bus— ( i ) Is engaged in furnishing (for compensation) intracity passenger land transportation that is available to the general public and is scheduled and along regular routes,
( ii ) Has a seating capacity of at least 20 adults (not including the driver), and
( iii ) Is under contract with (or is receiving more than a nominal subsidy from) any State or local government (as defined in section 4221(d)(4)) to furnish such transportation. A company that operates qualified local buses is eligible for a full refund or credit only with respect to fuel used while such buses are operating as qualified local buses. For example, a company that operates its buses along subsidized intracity routes and also on intercity or unsubsidized intracity routes may obtain a full refund or credit only with respect to fuel used while operating the subsidized intracity routes.
( b ) *Meaning of terms* — ( 1 ) *Contract with a State or local government.* A bus is under contract with a State or local government only if the contract imposes a bona fide obligation on the operator of the bus to furnish the transportation to which the contract relates.
( 2 ) *More than a nominal subsidy.* A subsidy is more than nominal if the subsidy is reasonably expected to exceed an amount equal to 3 cents multiplied by the number of gallons of fuel used while operating on subsidized routes.
( 3 ) *Intracity passenger land transportation.* The term “intracity passenger land transportation” means the land transportation of passengers to and from points located within the same metropolitan area. The term includes transportation along routes that cross State, city or county boundaries provided such routes remain within the metropolitan area.
[T.D. 8027, 50 FR 21252, May 23, 1985]
#### Lucas-Plaza Housing Development Corporation et al., Appellants, v Richard G. Corey et al., Respondents.

[805 NYS2d 9]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard B. Lowe, III, J.), entered November 17, 2004, which, inter alia, granted *218defendants’ motions to dismiss the amended complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

This litigation concerns the refinancing of long-term tax-exempt bonds issued in 1982 to finance construction of a low-income housing, project in Toledo, Ohio. Plaintiffs, government agencies providing public housing in Ohio, reissued the bonds in 1992 to take advantage of declining interest rates, and retained defendants to structure the refinancing of the bonds. In accordance with the relevant closing documents, the newly issued bonds were sold to defendant UBS’s predecessor firm in May 1992, and then assigned to defendant FHA/GNMA Funding I, Inc. (FHA/GNMA), which defeased the bonds in July 1992 by replacing the public housing project with United States Treasury bonds as security for the reissued bonds, thereby enhancing the value of the bonds. FHA/GNMA then resold the defeased bonds and realized a significant profit, which plaintiffs maintain was improper.

The IAS court properly granted defendants’ motions to dismiss the action as untimely because the alleged misconduct occurred in 1992 and plaintiffs did not commence this action, asserting causes for breach of contract and fraud, governed by six-year limitations periods (CPLR 213 [2], [8]), until October 2003. Plaintiffs’ contention, that the action was timely because they did not learn of the alleged fraudulent scheme until July 2002 when the IRS completed an investigation into several of the defendants, is unavailing, since the record establishes that in 1995, plaintiffs’ counsel questioned defendants about the defeasance of the newly issued bonds and whether plaintiffs were entitled to share in the monies generated by the remarketed bonds. “In order to start the limitations period regarding discovery, a plaintiff need only be aware of enough operative facts so that, with reasonable diligence, [it] could have discovered the fraud” *(Watts v Exxon Corp.,*188 AD2d 74, 76 [1993] [citation and internal quotation marks omitted]; *see also*CPLR 203 [g]). Nor, contrary to plaintiffs’ contention, were defendants equitably estopped from relying on the statute of limitations defense. “[E]quitable estoppel does not apply where the misrepresentation or act of concealment underlying the estoppel claim is the same act which forms the basis of plaintiffs underlying substantive cause of action” *(Kaufman v Cohen,*307 AD2d 113, 122 [2003]).

We have considered plaintiffs’ remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Ellerin, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.
| (logo) ncb  National Cooperative Bank    | 2011 Crystal Drive  Suite, 8oo  Arlington, Virginia 22202 |
|-----------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|

**FORM OF ANNUAL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

** **

CERTIFICATION

 

Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust 2016-LC25,Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-LC25 (the “Trust”)

 

I, Karyn Mann, on behalf of National Cooperative Bank,N.A., as NCB Special Servicer (the “Certifying Servicer”), certify toWells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. and its officers, directorsand affiliates, and with the knowledge and intent that they will rely upon thiscertification, that:

 

1.         I (or Servicing Officers under my supervision) have reviewed the Certifying Servicer’s activitiesduring the preceding calendar year between January 1, 2017 and December 31,2017 (the “Reporting Period”) and the CertifyingServicer’s performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement; and

 

2.         To the best of my knowledge, basedon such review, the Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligationsunder the Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respects during the Reporting Period. 

 

 

Date: February 6, 2018

 

 

National Cooperative Bank, N.A., as NCB Special Servicer

 

By:/s/ Karyn Mann

Name: Karyn Mann

Title: Senior Vice President
# L_2019019EN.01000301.xml

| 22.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 19/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 19/3

---

COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2019/93

of 21 January 2019

implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1509 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People's Republic of Korea

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1509 of 30 August 2017 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People's Republic of Korea and repealing Regulation (EC) No 329/2007 (1), and in particular Article 47(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 30 August 2017, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) 2017/1509. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 30 August 2017, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) 2017/1509.

| (2) | Two natural persons designated in Annex XV to Regulation (EU) 2017/1509 are deceased, and their entries should be removed from that Annex. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Two natural persons designated in Annex XV to Regulation (EU) 2017/1509 are deceased, and their entries should be removed from that Annex.

| (3) | Annex XV to Regulation (EU) 2017/1509 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex XV to Regulation (EU) 2017/1509 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex XV to Regulation (EU) 2017/1509 is amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the date following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 January 2019.

For the Council

The President

F. MOGHERINI

---

(1)  
  OJ L 224 31.8.2017, p. 1.

1

---

ANNEX

In Regulation (EU) 2017/1509, Annex XV, Part (a), the following entries are removed:

| 2. | CHU Kyu-Chang (D.O.B. 25.11.1928) |
| --- | --- |

2.

CHU Kyu-Chang (D.O.B. 25.11.1928)

| 4. | KIM Yong-chun (D.O.B. 4.3.1935). |
| --- | --- |

4.

KIM Yong-chun (D.O.B. 4.3.1935).

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### U.S. Customs and Border Protection

# AGENCY:

U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security.

# ACTION:

Notice of approval of Petrospect, Inc., as a commercial gauger.

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.13, Petrospect, Inc., 499 N. Nimitz Pier 21, Honolulu, HI 96817, has been approved to gauge petroleum, petroleum products, organic chemicals and vegetable oils for customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct gauger services should request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquires regarding the specific gauger service this entity is approved to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to                         *cbp.labhq@dhs.gov.*                         Please reference the Web site listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories.                         *http://cbp.gov/​xp/​cgov/​import/​operations_​support/​labs_​scientific_​svcs/​commercial_​gaugers/​.*

# DATES:

The approval of Petrospect, Inc., as commercial gauger became effective on May 21, 2009. The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for May 2012.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Anthony Malana, Laboratories and Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-1060.

Dated: August 4, 2009.

Ira S. Reese,

Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.

[FR Doc. E9-19388 Filed 8-12-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
www.gpo.gov

### §286e–13. Approval of fund pledge to sell gold to provide resources for Reserve Account of Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility Trust

The Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to instruct the United States Executive Director of the Fund to vote to approve the Fund's pledge to sell, if needed, up to 3,000,000 ounces of the Fund's gold, to restore the resources of the Reserve Account of the Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility Trust to a level that would be sufficient to meet obligations of the Trust payable to lenders which have made loans to the Loan Account of the Trust that have been used for the purpose of financing programs to Fund members previously in arrears to the Fund.

(July 31, 1945, ch. 339, §58, as added Pub. L. 102–511, title X, §1001, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3357.)
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 123 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con. Res.123
                                              Agreed to January 22, 1996

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. APPROVAL OF REGULATIONS.

    The regulations applicable to employing offices which are not the 
House of Representatives or the Senate and covered employees who are 
not the employees of the House of Representatives or the Senate which 
are to be issued by the Office of Compliance before January 23, 1996, 
are hereby approved on a provisional basis until such time as such 
regulations are approved in accordance with section 304(c) of the 
Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1384(c)).
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
www.gpo.gov

### §564a. Definitions

For the purposes of this subchapter:

(a) “Tribe” means the Klamath Tribe of Indians consisting of the Klamath and Modoc Tribes and Yahooskin Band of Snake Indians.

(b) “Secretary” means the Secretary of the Interior.

(c) “Lands” means real property, interests therein, or improvements thereon, and include water rights.

(d) “Tribal property” means any real or personal property, including water rights, or any interest in real or personal property, that belongs to the tribe and either is held by the United States in trust for the tribe or is subject to a restriction against alienation imposed by the United States.

(e) “Adult” means a person who is an adult according to the law of the place of his residence.

(Aug. 13, 1954, ch. 732, §2, 68 Stat. 718; Pub. L. 85–132, §1(f), Aug. 14, 1957, 71 Stat. 348.)

#### Amendments

1957—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 85–132 substituted provision defining adult as a person who is an adult according to the law of the place of his residence, for provision defining adult as a member of the tribe who has attained the age of twenty-one years.

#### Cross References

Modoc Tribe and its members, inapplicability of this subchapter to, see section 861a of this title.
#### Angela Mora Diaz et al., Respondents, v Harold Siegel et al., Appellants.

[806 NYS2d 9]

*252Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marylin G. Diamond, J.), entered on or about September 15, 2004, which, insofar as appealed from, denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ cause of action for breach of a written contract, unanimously modified, on the law, to grant the motion insofar as made on behalf of the individual defendant, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The parties’ conflicting affidavits raise an issue of fact as to whether the subject written contract was orally modified, as defendants claim. In any event, there are triable factual issues as to whether the written contract was breached. However, summary judgment should have been granted in favor of the individual defendant since he signed the contract in his capacity as the corporate defendant’s president, and there are no allegations of fraud or other wrongful conduct warranting a piercing of the corporate veil *(see Sheridan Broadcasting Corp. v Small,*19 AD3d 331 [2005]). We have reviewed defendants’ remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, Williams and Malone, JJ.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to this park navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to this park information section
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Cuyahoga Valley
National ParkOhio