alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 195 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                             H. J. RES. 195

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 Recognizing the end of slavery in the United States, and the true day 
                 of independence for African-Americans.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 195

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing the end of slavery in the United States, and the true day 
                 of independence for African-Americans.

Whereas ``Juneteenth'' celebrations have been held informally for over 130 years 
        to commemorate the strong survival instincts of African-Americans who 
        were first brought to this country stacked in the bottoms of slave ships 
        during a month-long journey across the Atlantic Ocean known as the 
        ``Middle Passage'';
Whereas the Civil War was fueled by the economic and social divide caused by 
        slavery;
Whereas on January 1, 1863, President Abraham Lincoln signed the Emancipation 
        Proclamation, the enforcement thereof occurred only in those Confederate 
        States under the control of the Union Army;
Whereas on January 31, 1863, Congress passed the Thirteenth Amendment to the 
        Constitution abolishing slavery throughout the United States and its 
        territories;
Whereas on April 9, 1865, when General Robert E. Lee surrendered on behalf of 
        the Confederate States at Appomattox, the Civil War was nonetheless 
        prolonged in the Southwest;
Whereas news of the Emancipation Proclamation reached each State at different 
        times;
Whereas the Emancipation Proclamation was not enforced in the Southwest until 
        June 19, 1865, when Union General Gordon Granger landed at Galveston, 
        Texas, to present and read General Order No. 3;
Whereas former slaves in the Southwest began celebrating the end of slavery and 
        recognized ``Juneteenth Independence Day''; and
Whereas ``Juneteenth'' allows us to look back on the past with an increased 
        appreciation for the strength of the men, women, and children who for 
        generations endured unspeakable cruelties in bondage: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the end of slavery in the 
United States should be celebrated and recognized.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 26, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
.. . 

CAS RN: Trade Name: 

-L 

Molecular Formula: 

Case Role --. e- Case Role -@ . 

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 7
STRUCTURE ACTIVITY TEAM REPORT CBI 04/2 0/99 

CASE NLXSER: P99-0669 

WTE: X4N is blocked: EO capped by PO 

RELATED CASES I 

CONCLUSIONS/DISCUSSIONS 

TYPE OF CONCERN: 

LEVEL OF CONCERN: 

IG3YWORDS: LUNG IRR-E,S,m 

AQUATOX 

SUMMARY OF ASSESSmNT 

FATE: Liquid 

HEALTH 

1-2 

i. 

- 

-.. 

ECOTOX 

2 

- 

LogKow =-2.31(E); S (mg/L, 25'C) = 628/Disp. (E); H < 1.00EMP (C) = <20(E); BP (C) > 400(E); VP @ 25C (m) < 1.OE-6(E) 

LogKoc = 1.00(E); LogBCF = 1.08(E); 

POTW removal .(%) 

301D(Closed Bottle): 8.2% biodeg in 28d, 

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg 2 mo 

PBT Potential: P2BlT1 

= 0-25 via.possible part biodeg; OECD 

Readily Biodegradable. 

Sorption to soils/sediments = low 

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = rapid 

HEALTH: 

tract, and good from the lung (analog). 

effects on the lung; irritation to eye, skin (chronic), mucous 

membranes and lung based on surfactant properties of the compounds. 

Absorption is poor from the skin, moderate from the GI 

Concern for surfactant - 

*CEB HEALTH: Low moderate concern (Dermal, inhalation) 

Test data with purity >99%: rat oral LD, = 2000 mg/kg; eye 

irritation in rabbits, cleared by day 5; no skin irritation in 

rabbits 

ECOTOX: 

(ppm) are: 

fish (ZF) 96-h Le50 = 29.0 M S,M p99 

daphnid 48-h LC50 = 40.0 P 

green algal 95-h EC50 = 40.0 P 

ss bact. 3-21 EC50 > 100.0 P S,N p>99 

fish chronic value - 8.0 P 

fish Ch'J = 6.0 P ZF96/ACR5 

daphnid ChV - 8.0 P 

Predicted ('P) and measured (M) toxicity values in mg/L 

fish 96-h LC50 = 40.0 P 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 7
algal ChV = 1o:o P 

ss bact. ChV >= 100.0 M S,N p>99 

ss bact. 3-’n SUECIECO) = 100.0 M S,N p99 

Predictions are based on SARs €or 

SAR cheloical class = 

log Xow of the hydrophobe%y 

ClogP is equivalent to 8 linear carbons; ith 35% <1ooc 

hilrdness <180.0 

and 23%<500; pH7; effective concentrations based on l-GO% act:-*-e 

ingredients and mean measured concentrations; 

mg/L as CaC03; 

moderate concern for toxicity; 

assessment factor = 10.0 

concern concentration = 0.600 based on TD 

*CEB ECOTOX: All releases to water 

and TOC <2.0 mg/L;. 

SAT Co-chair: Leonard Keifer 260-1548 

3 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 7
EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 7
3 

n 

* 

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 7
Y 

BEST COPY AVAfMBLE 

IF or mula: IEq Wt: - 

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 7
CREMI S TRY F 

/' 

 reg Fritz 

Prec? Met2 

- 

EWIRONMENTAL FATE 

Bob Boethling 

David Lynch 

Gary Thorn 

HEALTH -2 atherine Anitole 

Michael Chino 

- Leonard Keif er 

- David Lai 

Jim Murphy 

Deborah Norris 

Rcnald Ward 

Yin Tak Woo 

- 

- 

ENVIRONMENTAL EZTECTS 

Sordon Cash 

VLnce Nabholz 

xiaggis Wilson 

SAT CKAIRPERSON/#TKER 

- .- Xebecca Zones 

, inze Nahholz 

Leonard Xeifer . _- J *- ~ 

- I 'I 

EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 7
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION OF SENIOR OFFICER IN CHARGE OF THE SERVICING FUNCTION OF THE SERVICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Kim Taylor, certify that:





1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Huntington Auto Trust 2016-1 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");





2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on the information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.








By:     /s/ Kim Taylor


Name:     Kim Taylor


Title:       Senior Vice President, The Huntington National Bank, as Servicer





Date: March 15, 2018
#### Caroline Delran, Appellant, v Prada USA Corp., Respondent.

[804 NYS2d 243]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter B. Tolub, J.), entered August 6, 2004, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, dismissed count one of the complaint, pursuant to CFLR 3211 (a) (7), for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

While it is true that in considering a motion to dismiss brought pursuant to CFLR 3211 (a) (7), the court must presume the facts pleaded to be true and must accord them every favorable inference *(Cron v Hargro Fabrics,*91 NY2d 362, 366 [1998]; *Hispanic AIDS Forum v Estate of Bruno,*16 AD3d 294, 295 [2005]), factual allegations that do not set forth a viable cause of action, or that consist of bare legal conclusions, are not entitled to such consideration *(Skillgames, LLC v Brody,*1 AD3d 247, 250 [2003]; *Caniglia v Chicago Tribune-N.Y. News Syndicate,*204 AD2d 233 [1994]).

In this matter, we agree with the motion court that plaintiffs allegations do not fall within the ambit of the statute and, therefore, fail to state a cause of action. Concur—Sullivan, J.P., Ellerin, Nardelli and Sweeny, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 203 Received in Senate (RDS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 203

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 26, 1996

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
            Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, in consonance with section 132(a) of the Legislative 
Reorganization Act of 1946, when the House adjourns on the legislative 
day of Thursday, August 1, 1996, Friday, August 2, 1996, or Saturday, 
August 3, 
1996, pursuant to a motion made by the Majority Leader or his designee, 
it stand adjourned until noon on Wednesday, September 4, 1996, or until 
noon on the second day after Members are notified to reassemble 
pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs 
first; and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of 
business on Thursday, August 1, 1996, Friday, August 2, 1996, Saturday, 
August 3, 1996, or Sunday, August 4, 1996, pursuant to a motion made by 
the Majority Leader or his designee in accordance with this resolution, 
it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Tuesday, September 3, 
1996, or until such time on that day as may be specified by the 
Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or 
until noon on the second day after Members are notified to reassemble 
pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs 
first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, 
in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 26, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.

                              By Linda Nave,

                                                          Deputy Clerk.
```
§ 48.6416(b)(2)-4 Supporting evidence required in case of special fuels tax involving exportations, uses, sales, or resales of special fuels. ( a ) *Evidence to be submitted by claimant.* No claim for credit or refund of an overpayment, within the meaning of section 6416(b)(2) and § 48.6416(b)(2)-2 of tax under section 4041 (a)(1) or (b)(2) shall be allowed unless the person who paid the tax submits with the claim the evidence required by paragraph (b)(2) of § 48.6416(a)-2 and a statement, supported by sufficient available evidence— ( 1 ) Showing the amount claimed in respect of each category of exportations, uses, sales, or resales on which the claim is based and which give rise to right of credit or refund under section 6416(b)(2) and § 48.6416(b)(2)-1,
( 2 ) Identifying the fuel, both as to nature and quantity, in respect of which credit or refund is claimed,
( 3 ) Showing the amount of tax paid in respect of the fuel and the dates of payment, and
( 4 ) Indicating that the fuel has been exported, or has been used, sold, or resold in a manner or for a purpose which gives rise to an overpayment within the meaning of section 6416(b)(2) and § 48.6416(b)(2)-2.
( b ) *Evidence required to be in possession of claimant.* ( 1 ) The evidence required to be retained by the person who paid the tax, as provided in paragraph (a)(4) of this section, must, in the case of fuel exported, consist of proof of exportation or must, in the case of other fuel sold tax-paid by that person, consist of a certificate, executed and signed by the person who purchased the fuel in a resale or for the use which gave rise to the overpayment.
( 2 ) The certificate must identify the fuel, both as to nature and quantity, in respect of which credit or refund is claimed; show the address of the purchaser; show the name and address of the person from whom the fuel was purchased and the date or dates on which the fuel was purchased; and show that the fuel was resold and the date of the resale.
( 3 ) If the claim is not based on resale of the fuel, the certificate must describe the use actually made of the fuel in sufficient detail to establish that credit or refund is due. However, the use to be made of the fuel must be described in lieu of actual use if the claim is made by reason of the sale of the fuel for a specified use which gives rise to an overpayment under § 48.6416(b)(2)-2.
( 4 ) If the certificate sets forth the use to be made of the fuel, rather than its actual use, it must show that the purchaser has agreed to notify the claimant if the fuel is not in fact used as specified in the certificate.
( 5 ) The certificate must also contain a statement that the purchaser has not previously executed a certificate in respect of the fuel and understands that any party may, for fraudulent use of the certificate, be subject under section 7201 to a fine of not more than $10,000, or imprisonment for not more than 5 years, or both, together with the costs of prosecution.
[T.D. 8043, 50 FR 32030, Aug. 8, 1985]
Proposed Rule: Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions 

Meeting Documentation: Electronics Manufacturing Stakeholder Outreach Call Date Staff Contact Information Name of 

Organization 

Summary of Discussion Written Commen

Provided? Did they also submit to Docke

April 15, 2010 Kirsten Cappel 

(202) 343-9556 cappel.kirsten@epa.gov 

Identified below. 

Stakeholder outreach call on the Electronics Manufacturing section of the proposed rule “Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases: Additional Sources of Fluorinated GHGs.” PowerPoint presentation included in the docket. 

NA 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EPA Participants: 

Kirsten Cappel 

Diane McConkey 

Sally Rand 

Paul Gunning 

Participants that confirmed their participation: 

Contact Name Organization Email Address 

Brian R. Keck Air Products KECKBR@airproducts.com 

Dina Schiller Applied Materials Dina_Schiller@amat.com 

Donna Sadowy AMD donna.sadowy@amd.com 

Dorothea Blouin U.S. Department of Commerce dorothea.blouin@trade.gov 

David Lancaster Fairchild Semiconductor david.lancaster@fairchildsemi.com 

Laura Mendicino Freescale Laura.Mendicino@freescale.com 

Reed M. Content GlobalFoundaries reed.content@globalfoundries.com 

Heather O'Cleirigh GlobalFoundaries heather.ocleirigh@globalfoundries.com 

David Speed IBM speed@us.ibm.com 

Janet Doyle IBM jmdoyle@us.ibm.com 

Jay Dietrich IBM jdietric@us.ibm.com 

Tim Higgs Intel tim.g.higgs@intel.com 

Laurie Beu ISMI- Consultant Laurie.Beu@ismi.sematech.org 

Ron Remke ISMI ron.remke@ismi.sematech.org 

Alan Abbott Microchip alan.abbott@microchip.com 

Bob Hearn Micron whearn@micron.com 

Chris Dott Micron cdott@micron.com 

Mike McIntyre Micron mmcintyre@micron.com 

Staci O'Connell ON Semiconductor Staci.OConnell@onsemi.com 

Krista Johnston ON Semiconductor Krista.Johnston@onsemi.com 

Katherine Stainken SEIA KStainken@seia.org 

Monique Hanis SEIA mhanis@seia.org 

Sanjay Baliga SEMI sbaliga@semi.org 

Mike Sherer 

Sherer Consulting Services, 

Inc. Msherereng@aol.com 

Tom Diamond SIA tdiamond@sia-online.org 

Don Magid Solvay Fluorides, LLC don.magid@solvay.com 

Linda Perry-Lynch SunPower Corp. 

Linda.PerryLynch@sunpowercorp.com 

Revati Pradhan-Kasmalkar Tantra Consulting revati.kasmalkar@yahoo.com 

Sébastien Raoux 

Transcarbon International 

Corp. sraoux@transcarbon.com 

Tina Gilliand TI t-gilliland@ti.com 

Cynthia Johnson TI ckjohnson@ti.com 

Laurie Lehmberg TI l-lehmberg@ti.com 

Joe Van Gompel joe.van.gompel@gmail.com 

Scott Inloes WaferTech SInloes@wafertech.com
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Foster, Appellant.

[803 NYS2d 808]

Lahtinen, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Breslin, J.), rendered January 28, 2004, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Pursuant to a plea agreement, defendant pleaded guilty to criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree in satisfaction of several charges contained in two separate indict*840ments pending against him in Albany County, with the understanding that a prison sentence of 6 to 18 years would be imposed. Prior to sentencing, defendant moved to withdraw his plea, claiming that he had not had enough time to consider the offer and that he was innocent. County Court denied defendant’s motion and proceeded to sentence him as agreed. Defendant now appeals.

Review of the record confirms that defendant’s plea was knowing, voluntary and intelligent. County Court informed defendant of the rights he was relinquishing by pleading guilty and the ramifications thereof. Defendant acknowledged that he understood those rights, that he had not been threatened or coerced into entering the plea and that he had been afforded adequate time to discuss his choice with counsel representing him on each of the indictments. Additionally, during the plea colloquy defendant unequivocally admitted the alleged conduct and his subsequent claims of innocence were not substantiated by anything other than his own conclusory statements. Under these circumstances, County Court’s denial of defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea was proper *(see People v King,*20 AD3d 580, 581 [2005], *lv denied*5 NY3d 829 [2005]; *People v Coss,*19 AD3d 943, 943-944 [2005], *lv denied*5 NY3d 805 [2005]; *People v Watson,*8 AD3d 911, 911-912 [2004]). Given defendant’s knowing, voluntary and intelligent plea and waiver of the right to appeal, we will not review his contention that his sentence was harsh and excessive *(see People v Mondore,*18 AD3d 961, 962 [2005]; *People v Frazier, 17*AD3d 869, 869 [2005]; *People v Clow,*10 AD3d 803, 804-805 [2004]).

Cardona, P.J., Mugglin, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1074 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1074

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for uniform 
 coverage under part B of the medicare program of blood-testing strips 
                     for individuals with diabetes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 28, 1995

    Ms. Furse (for herself, Mr. Gejdenson, Mr. Nethercutt, and Mr. 
  Lipinski) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Commerce and, in addition, to the Committee on Ways and 
 Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for uniform 
 coverage under part B of the medicare program of blood-testing strips 
                     for individuals with diabetes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MEDICARE COVERAGE OF BLOOD-TESTING STRIPS FOR INDIVIDUALS 
              WITH DIABETES.

    (a) Including Strips as Durable Medical Equipment.--Section 1861(n) 
of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(n)) is amended by striking 
the semicolon in the first sentence and inserting the following: ``, 
and includes blood-testing strips for individuals with diabetes without 
regard to whether the individual has Type I or Type II diabetes (as 
determined under standards established by the Secretary in consultation 
with the American Diabetes Association);''.
    (b) Payment for Strips Based on Methodology for Inexpensive and 
Routinely Purchased Equipment.--Section 1834(a)(2)(A) of such Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395m(a)(2)(A)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' at the end of clause (ii);
            (2) by adding ``or'' at the end of clause (iii); and
            (3) by inserting after clause (iii) the following new 
        clause:
                            ``(iv) which is a blood-testing strip for 
                        an individual with diabetes,''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to blood-testing strips furnished on or after January 1, 1996.
                                 <all>
```