alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 31.3402(f)(3)-1 When withholding allowance certificate takes effect. ( a ) *No withholding allowance certificate on file.* A withholding allowance certificate furnished to the employer in any case in which no previous withholding allowance certificate is in effect with such employer, takes effect as of the beginning of the first payroll period ending, or the first payment of wages made without regard to a payroll period, on or after the date on which such certificate is so furnished.
( b ) *Withholding allowance certificate on file.* Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, a withholding allowance certificate furnished to the employer in any case in which a previous withholding allowance certificate is in effect with such employer takes effect as of the beginning of the first payroll period ending (or the first payment of wages made without regard to a payroll period) on or after the 30th day after the day on which such certificate is so furnished. However, the employer may elect to put a withholding allowance certificate into effect earlier, beginning with any payment of wages on or after the day on which the certificate is so furnished.
( c ) *Withholding allowance certificate furnished to take effect in next calendar year.* A withholding allowance certificate furnished to the employer pursuant to section 3402(f)(2)(C) (see § 31.3402(f)(2)-1(e) or § 31.3402(l)-1(c)) which effects a change for the next calendar year, does not take effect, and may not be made effective, with respect to the calendar year in which the certificate is furnished.
( d ) *Applicability date.* The provisions of this section apply on and after October 6, 2020. Taxpayers may choose to apply this section on or after January 1, 2020 and before October 6, 2020. For rules that apply before October 6, 2020, see 26 CFR part 31, revised as of April 1, 2020.
[T.D. 9924, 85 FR 63031, Oct. 6, 2020]
#### Sheila Neckles, Respondent, v VW Credit, Inc., Appellant and Third-Party Plaintiff, et al., Defendants, et al., Third-Party Defendant.

[803 NYS2d 531]

*192Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J-), entered January 5, 2005, which granted plaintiffs motion to sever the third-party complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, and the motion denied.

The motion court erred in granting plaintiffs motion to sever the main action from the third-party action. The main and third-party actions involve common factual and legal issues which should be tried together *(see Stark v Greenberg, Dauber & Epstein,*219 AD2d 571 [1995]; *see also Vitiello v Mayrich Constr. Corp.,*255 AD2d 182, 184 [1998]). Furthermore, plaintiff does not claim that further disclosure is required *(compare 17 Vista Fee Assoc. v Teachers Ins. & Annuity Assn. of Am.,*226 AD2d 298 [1996]), or that the trial in the main action otherwise will be delayed if the motion is denied. Moreover, denial of plaintiffs motion to sever will allow the third-party defendant, who may be liable for indemnification to appellant, to participate in the damages phase of the first-party action *(see Graziano v 118-17 Liberty Ave. Mgt. Corp.,*209 AD2d 582, 583 [1994]). Finally, plaintiffs claim of prejudice is speculative and unsupported by the record. Concur—Friedman, J.P., Marlow, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

CHARLENE COLLINS LEE
, Plaintiff
,

v.

UNITED STATES TREASURY DEPARTMENT
, Defendant

. Criminal Action No. 22

- 1835 ( RDM )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Plaintiff C h arlene C ollins Lee , proceeding pro se , brought this action against the U.S.

Treasury Department “in conjunction with the Secret Service” seeking among other things,

“several hearings to ward off any lingering federal and state employment stalking s.” Dkt. 1 at 1 ;

Dkt. 1

- 2 a t 1 . For the following reasons, the Court will sua sponte dismiss the complaint without

prejudice.

Complaints by pro se litigants are held to “less stringent standards than formal pleadings

drafted by lawyers.” Haines v. Kerner , 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even a pro se litigant,

however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch , 656 F. Supp

. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a

complaint contain “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to

relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). This requirement “ensures that the opposing party will receive ‘fair

notice of what the . . . claim is and the grounds upon which it rests.’” Jones v. Changsila , 271 F.

Supp. 3d 9, 21 (D.D.C. 2017) (quoting Erickson v. Pardus , 551 U.S. 89, 93 (2007)). “Where a

complaint is insufficien tly focused, it places an undue burden on the defendant to answer or2 move[,] and it invites unnecessary delay and confusion in the proceedings.” Achagzai v. Broad.

Bd. of Governors , 109 F. Supp. 3d 67, 71 (D.D.C. 2015). In addition, Rule 12(b)(6) entitle s an
opposing party to dismissal if the complaint “fail[s] to state a claim upon which relief can be

granted.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). “ To survive a motion to dismiss, a complaint must contain

sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’”

Ashcroft v. Iqbal , 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly , 550 U.S. 544,

570 (2007)).

Plaintiff’s complaint fails to comply with Rules 8 and 12(b)(6) because it does not alleg e
any facts that would allow the Court to discern the substance of Plaintiff’s claims or to determine

whether, if true, h er allegations would entitle h er to relief. See Brown v. Wash. Metro. Area

Transit Auth., 164 F. Supp. 3d 33, 35 (D.D.C. 2016). The C ourt will, therefore, sua sponte

dismiss the complaint without prejudice. See Fontaine v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. , 42 F.

Supp. 3d 102, 109 n.3 (D.D.C. 2014).

A separate order will issue.

/s/ Randolph D. Moss RANDOLPH D. MOSS United States District Judge

Date: July 6, 2022
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Richard Rubin, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of American BiogeneticSciences, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the  issuer as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4. The  issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as 4efined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the  issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the  issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or causedsuch internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the  issuer's disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the  issuer's internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the  issuer's most recentfiscal quarter (the  issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the  issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The  issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the  issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the  issuer's board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the  issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether r not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the  issuer's internal control overfinancial reporting.

Date: August 14, 2009

/s/ Richard RubinCEO, CFO and Chairman
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1177 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1177

                   For the relief of Debra Bargeski.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 1995

   Mr. Bartlett of Maryland introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                   For the relief of Debra Bargeski.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAYMENT OF CLAIM.

    The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of any money in the 
Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to Debra Bargeski of Braddock 
Heights, Maryland, the sum of $29,000 and interest on such sum, 
calculated at the rate established under section 6621(a)(2) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 6621(a)(2)) and compounded 
daily, for the period beginning on March 9, 1988, and ending on the 
date on which the payment is made. The payment required by this section 
shall be in full satisfaction of all claims that Debra Bargeski may 
have against the United States with respect to the taxable year ending 
December 31, 1981.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON AGENT AND ATTORNEY FEES.

    It shall be unlawful for an amount exceeding 10 percent of the 
payment required by section 1 to be paid to or received by any agent or 
attorney for any service rendered in connection with the payment. Any 
person who violates this section shall be guilty of an infraction and 
shall be subject to a fine in the amount provided in title 18, United 
States Code.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                           GTECH HOLDINGS CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GTECH Holdings Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 24, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the Date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jaymin
B. Patel, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C section 1350, as adopted pursuant to sections 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.

                                    GTECH HOLDINGS CORPORATION

Date: July 3, 2003                  By /s/ Jaymin B. Patel
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Jaymin B. Patel, Senior Vice President and
                                    Chief Financial Officer
Attachment 4 Production volume explaination

Sanitized
www.gpo.gov

### §564c. Personal property rights; restrictions; tax exemption

Upon publication in the Federal Register of the final roll as provided in section 564b of this title, the rights or beneficial interests in tribal property of each person whose name appears on the roll shall constitute personal property which may be inherited or bequeathed, but shall not otherwise be subject to alienation or encumbrance before the transfer of title to such tribal property as provided in section 564e of this title without the approval of the Secretary. Any contract made in violation of this section shall be null and void. Property which this section makes subject to inheritance or bequest and which is inherited or bequeathed after August 13, 1954, and prior to the transfer of title to tribal property as provided in section 564e of this title shall not be subject to State or Federal inheritance, estate, legacy, or succession taxes.

(Aug. 13, 1954, ch. 732, §4, 68 Stat. 718; Pub. L. 85–731, §2, Aug. 23, 1958, 72 Stat. 818.)

#### Amendments

1958—Pub. L. 85–731 inserted provision that property which is inherited or bequeathed after Aug. 13, 1954, and prior to transfer of title to tribal property should not be subject to taxes.

#### Revolving Fund: Interest-Free Loans to Klamath Indians; Refinancing Lending Agency Loans

Use of Revolving Loan Fund for Indians to assist Klamath Indians during period for terminating Federal supervision, see note set out under section 564 of this title.
IA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 65

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to limit

the terms of Representatives and Senators, to provide for a four-year

term for Representatives, and to provide for campaign contribution limitations with respect to elections for Federal office.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 26, 1995

Mr. THORNTON introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States to limit the terms of Representatives and Senators, to provide for a four-year term for Representatives, and to provide for campaign contribution limitations with respect to elections for Federal office.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the follow4 ing article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitu5 tion of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents

6 and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by

7 the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States with-
2

•HJ 65 IH

1 in seven years after the date of its submission by the Con2 gress:

3 ‘‘ARTICLE—

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. The term of office of a Member of the

5 House of Representatives shall be four years, beginning

6 with the first election of Representatives occurring after

7 this article becomes valid as a part of the Constitution.

8 The House of Representatives shall adopt procedures to

9 ensure that one half of the House of Representatives is

10 elected every two years and that, as much as possible, one

11 half of each State’s delegation is elected every two years.

12 ‘‘SECTION 2. A person may not be elected to serve

13 a term as a Representative if the person has been elected

14 to serve as a Representative for the twelve consecutive

15 years that immediately precede the term. A person may

16 not be elected to serve a term as a Senator if the person

17 has been elected to serve as a Senator for the twelve con18 secutive years that immediately precede the term.

19 ‘‘Service as a Representative or Senator after Janu20 ary 1, 1995, shall be included in determining the number

21 of years to which the person has been elected to serve as

22 a Representative or Senator.

23 ‘‘SECTION 3. Beginning with the first election after

24 this article becomes valid as a part of the Constitution,

25 no person or entity may make contributions, solicit or re-
3

•HJ 65 IH

1 ceive contributions, or make expenditures, with respect to

2 a candidate for the office of either Representative or Sen3 ator earlier than eighteen months before the ending of the

4 term then being served, if the candidate is an incumbent

5 of either the office of Representative or Senator.

6 ‘‘The Congress shall have the power, by appropriate

7 legislation, to establish additional limitations on contribu8 tions and expenditures, including the expenditure of per9 sonal funds by the candidate, with respect to an election

10 for any Federal office.’’.

Æ
www.gpo.gov

### §203. Availability of funds

Funds authorized for,1 forest development roads and trails, public lands development roads and trails, park road, parkways, Indian reservation roads, and public lands highways shall be available for contract upon apportionment, or on October 1 of the fiscal year for which authorized if no apportionment is required. Any amount remaining unexpended for a period of three years after the close of the fiscal year for which authorized shall lapse. The Secretary of the Department charged with the administration of such funds is granted authority to incur obligations, approve projects, and enter into contracts under such authorizations and his action in doing so shall be deemed a contractual obligation of the United States for the payment of the cost thereof and such funds shall be deemed to have been expended when so obligated. Any funds heretofore or hereafter authorized for any fiscal year for,1 forest development roads and trails, public lands development roads and trails, park road, parkways, Indian roads and public lands highways shall be deemed to have been expended if a sum equal to the total of the sums authorized for such fiscal year and previous fiscal years since and including the fiscal year ending June 30, 1955, shall have been obligated. Any of such funds released by payment of final voucher or modification of project authorizations shall be credited to the balance of unobligated authorizations and be immediately available for expenditure.

(Pub. L. 85–767, Aug. 27, 1958, 72 Stat. 906; Pub. L. 86–657, §8(b), July 14, 1960, 74 Stat. 524; Pub. L. 87–866, §7, Oct. 23, 1962, 76 Stat. 1147; Pub. L. 94–280, title I, §117(b), May 5, 1976, 90 Stat. 437; Pub. L. 97–424, title I, §126(f), Jan. 6, 1983, 96 Stat. 2116; Pub. L. 102–240, title I, §1032(f), Dec. 18, 1991, 105 Stat. 1975.)

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–240 struck out “forest highways” before “, forest development roads” in two places.

1983—Pub. L. 97–424 substituted “park road” for “park roads and trails” wherever appearing.

1976—Pub. L. 94–280 substituted “or on October 1” for “or a date not earlier than one year preceding the beginning” in first sentence and “three years” for “two years” in second sentence.

1962—Pub. L. 87–866 inserted “public lands development roads and trails,” before “park roads and trails” in two places.

1960—Pub. L. 86–657 substituted “Funds authorized” for “Funds now authorized” in first sentence.

#### Effective Date of 1991 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 102–240 effective Dec. 18, 1991, and applicable to funds authorized to be appropriated or made available after Sept. 30, 1991, and, with certain exceptions, not applicable to funds appropriated or made available on or before Sept. 30, 1991, see section 1100 of Pub. L. 102–240, set out as a note under section 104 of this title.

1 So in original. The comma probably should not appear.
#### § 403.55 Alternative methods of sale.

When personal property forfeited administratively is to be sold, the Commissioner or his delegate shall cause a notice of sale to be placed in a newspaper of general circulation published in the judicial district wherein the seizure was made. The sale shall occur not less than 10 days from the date of the publication of the notice. At the discretion of the Commissioner or his delegate the forfeited personal property may be sold at public auction to the highest bidder on open, competitive bids, or sold to the highest bidder on sealed, competitive bids.

(Sec. 7325, 68A Stat. 870, as amended; (26 U.S.C. 7325))
Amendment Number 1, dated January 3, 2007



 EXHIBIT 10.8.1 
 Amendment Number 1 to 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED 
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 James J. Bryja

 THIS AMENDMENT, is made effective as of January 3, 2007, by and between Foundation Coal Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”) and (“Executive”). 
 WHEREAS, the Company and Executive previously entered into an Amended and
Restated Employment Agreement, dated March 13, 2006 (the “Employment Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (“Committee”) has considered the annual bonus percentage of base salary for obtaining target performance contained in the Employment Agreement; and 
 WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee requested a report from its independent compensation consultant regarding the appropriate percentage level of base
salary for obtaining target performance; and 
 WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee has reviewed the information provided by independent
compensation consultant and has determined it would be in the best interest of the Company and its Stockholders to amend the Employment Agreement to revise the percentage level of base salary for obtaining target performance. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the parties agree as follows:

 Section 4. Annual Bonus. The Percent of Base Salary is revised for obtaining 100% of Target Performance as shown: 

From: 
  

							
	 Company
 Performance
	  	 Percent of
Base Salary
	  	 Individual
 Performance
	  	 Percent of
 Base Salary

	 100% of Target
	  	33.33%	  	Target	  	16.67%

 To: 
  

							
	 Company
 Performance
	  	 Percent of
Base Salary
	  	 Individual
 Performance
	  	 Percent of
Base Salary

	 100% of Target
	  	43.5%	  	Target	  	21.5%

  

 1 








 Except as otherwise noted in this Amendment Number 1, all other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement remain
as originally written. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms of this Amendment Number 1 and the terms of the Employment Agreement, the terms of this Amendment Number 1 shall be controlling. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. 
  

									
	FOUNDATION COAL CORPORATION	 		 	JAMES J. BRYJA
					
	  	 	/S/ MICHAEL R. PEELISH        	 		 	  	 	/S/ JAMES J. BRYJA        
	 By:
 Title:
	 	 Michael R. Peelish
 SVP Safety and Human
Resources
	 		 		 	

  

 2