alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1129 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1129

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 15, 1996

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the route from 
           Selma to Montgomery as a National Historic Trail.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 5(a) of 
the National Trails System Act (16 
U.S.C. 1244(a)) is amended by adding at the end thereof the following 
new paragraph:
    ``( ) The Selma to Montgomery National Historic Trail, consisting 
of 54 miles of city streets and United States Highway 80 from Brown 
Chapel A.M.E. Church in Selma to the State Capitol Building in 
Montgomery, Alabama, traveled by voting rights advocates during March 
1965 to dramatize the need for voting rights legislation, as generally 
described in the report of the Secretary of the Interior prepared 
pursuant to subsection (b) of this section entitled `Selma to 
Montgomery' and dated April 1993. Maps depicting the route shall be on 
file and available for public inspection in the Office of the National 
Park Service, Department of the Interior. The trail shall be 
administered in accordance with this Act, including section 7(h). The 
Secretary of the Interior, acting through the National Park Service, 
which shall be the lead Federal agency, shall cooperate with other 
Federal, State and local authorities to preserve historic sites along 
the route, including (but not limited to) the Edmund Pettus Bridge and 
the Brown Chapel A.M.E. Church.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 14, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-7006

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

CHRISTOPHER MITCHELL, a/k/a Hassan Jones, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern 

District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, 

Jr., District Judge. (2:90-cr-00020-2) 

Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 27, 2009 

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, 

Senior Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Christopher Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. John J. Frail, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 Christopher Mitchell appeals the district court’s 

order granting in part and denying in part his motion for 

reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. United States v. Mitchell, No. 2:90-cr-00020-2 (S.D.W. 

Va. May 8, 2009). We deny Mitchell’s motion for appointment of 

counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 157 (Monday, August 17, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41415-41416]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19604]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13405-000]


Clean River Power MR-1, LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit 
Application Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To 
Intervene, and Competing Applications

August 6, 2009.
    On March 25, 2009, Clean River Power MR-1, LLC filed an 
application, pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act, 
proposing to study the feasibility of the Devola Lock and Dam Water 
Power Project, to be located at the State of Ohio's Devola lock and dam 
on the Muskingum River in Washington County, Ohio.
    The proposed Devola Lock and Dam Project would consist of: (1) The 
existing 17.5-foot-high, 587-foot-long concrete dam; (2) the existing 
301-acre reservoir with a 3,024 acre-foot storage capacity; (3) a new 
175-foot-long, 120-foot-wide intake structure; (4) a 120-foot-long, 
120-foot-wide power canal; (5) a new powerhouse containing three 
proposed generating units with a total installed capacity of 4.3 
megawatts; (6) a new 250-foot-long tailrace; (7) a new switchyard 
containing a single three-phase step-up transformer; and (8) a new 
4,000-foot-long, 34.5-kilovolt overhead transmission line. The project 
would have an estimated average annual generation of 17,300 megawatt-
hours.
    Applicant Contact: Mr. Alan Skelly, 8425 Beechmont Avenue, 
Cincinnati, OH 45255, phone (513) 375-9242.
    FERC Contact: Michael Spencer, (202) 502-6093.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing 
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file 
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice. 
Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing 
applications may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site 
under the ``e-Filing'' link. If unable to be filed electronically, 
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight 
copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For 
more information on how to submit these types of filings please go to 
the Commission's Web site located at http://www.ferc.gov/filing-comments.asp. More information about this project can be viewed or 
printed on

[[Page 41416]]

the ``eLibrary'' link of Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number (P-13405) in the 
docket number field to access the document. For assistance, call toll-
free 1-866-208-3372.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-19604 Filed 8-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
§ 601.108 Review of overpayments exceeding $200,000. ( a ) *General.* Section 6405(a) of the Code provides that no refund or credit of income, war profits, excess profits, estate, or gift taxes or any tax imposed by Chapters 41 through 44, including penalties and interest, in excess of $200,000 may be made until after the expiration of 30 days from the date a report is made to the Joint Committee on Taxation. Taxpayers, in cases requiring review by the Joint Committee, are afforded the same appeal rights as other taxpayers. In general, these cases follow regular procedures, except for preparation of reports to and review by the Joint Committee.
( b ) *Reports to Joint Committee.* In any case in which no protest is made to Appeals and no petition docketed in the Tax Court, the report to the Joint Committee is prepared by a Joint Committee Coordinator, who is an Examination Division regional specialist. In cases in which a protest has been made, the report to the Joint Committee is prepared by an Appeals officer; in cases in which a petition is docketed, either an Appeals officer or a Counsel attorney prepares the report, depending on the circumstances.
( c ) *Procedure after report to Joint Committee.* After compliance with section 6405 of the Code, the case is processed for issuance of a certificate of overassessment, and payment or credit of any overpayment. If the final determination involves a rejection of a claimed overpayment in whole or in part, a statutory notice of disallowance will be sent by certified or registered mail to the taxpayer, except where the taxpayer has filed a written waiver of such notice of disallowance.
[32 FR 15990, Nov. 22, 1967, as amended at 42 FR 46519, Sept. 16, 1977; 43 FR 44503, Sept. 28, 1978; 43 FR 53030, Nov. 15, 1978; 45 FR 7255, Feb. 1, 1980]
www.gpo.gov

### §485. Payment to assignment holders of moneys collected for use of subsurface rights

The Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe are authorized to pay to each holder of an exchange assignment of tribal lands all moneys collected by the tribe for the lease or use of subsurface rights in such lands.

(July 14, 1954, ch. 472, §2, 68 Stat. 468.)

#### Section Referred to in Other Sections

This section is referred to in section 486 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,502
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,061
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      3,618
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          28,062
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            27,838
<LOANS>                                        273,666
<ALLOWANCE>                                        872
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 317,392
<DEPOSITS>                                     234,140
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,798
<LONG-TERM>                                     57,897
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,557
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 317,392
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 16,507
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  824
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   768
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                18,099
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               8,836
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,030
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            7,069
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  36
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,325
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,566
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,347
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,347
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.18
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.21
<LOANS-NON>                                        396
<LOANS-PAST>                                       201
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    385
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   857
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        5
<RECOVERIES>                                        20
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  872
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            872
        

</TABLE>
#### § 1010.220 Customer identification program requirements.

Each financial institution (as defined in 31 U.S.C. 5312(a)(2) or (c)(1)) should refer to subpart B of its chapter X part for any additional customer identification program requirements.
#### § 1026.600 General.

Futures commission merchants and introducing brokers in commodities are subject to the special standards of diligence; prohibitions; and special measures requirements set forth and cross referenced in this subpart. Futures commission merchants and introducing brokers in commodities should also refer to subpart F of part 1010 of this chapter for special standards of diligence; prohibitions; and special measures contained in that subpart which apply to futures commission merchants and introducing brokers in commodities.
ROCKY EUGENE JACKSON

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 4668

___ __________________________/

Opinion filed June 5, 2017.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County

. Keith Brace , Judge

.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender

, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pa mela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, ROWE, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1011 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1011

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act applicable to the 
     construction of a hydroelectric project in the State of Ohio.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1011

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act applicable to the 
     construction of a hydroelectric project in the State of Ohio.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE.

    Notwithstanding the time limitations of section 13 of the Federal 
Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 
upon the request of the licensee for FERC Project No. 9423 (and after 
reasonable notice), is authorized, in accordance with the good faith, 
due diligence, and public interest requirements of such section 13 and 
the Commission's procedures under such section, to extend the time 
required for commencement of construction for the project for up to a 
maximum of 3 consecutive 2-year periods. This section shall take effect 
for the project upon the expiration of the extension (issued by the 
Commission under such section 13) of the period required for 
commencement of construction of such project.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 13, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
§ 31.3306(b)(8)-1 Payments to employees for non-work periods. The term “wages” does not include any payment (other than vacation or sick pay) made by an employer to an employee after the calendar month in which the employee attains age 65, if— ( a ) Such employee does no work (other than being subject to call for the performance of work) for such employer in the period for which such payment is made; and
( b ) The employer-employee relationship exists between the employer and employee throughout the period for which such payment is made.
Vacation or sick pay is not within this exclusion from wages. If the employee does any work for the employer in the period for which the payment is made, no remuneration paid by such employer to such employee with respect to such period is within this exclusion from wages. For example, if employee A, who attained the age of 65 in January 1955, is employed by the X Company on a stand-by basis and is paid $200 by the X Company for being subject to call during the month of February 1955 and an additional $25 for work performed for the X Company on one day in February 1955, then none of the $225 is excluded from wages under this exception. [T.D. 6516, 25 FR 13032, Dec. 20, 1960, as amended by T.D. 6708, 29 FR 3199, Mar. 10, 1964]
[SPECIMEN COMMON STOCK CERTIFICATE]


 


	NUMBER_______	_______SHARES


 


NET ELEMENT INTERNATIONAL, INC.

INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

COMMON STOCK


 


SEE REVERSE FOR


CERTAIN DEFINITIONS


 


CUSIP: _______


 


THIS CERTIFIES
THAT _________________________ is the owner of ___________________________

FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE OF $0.0001 PER SHARE, OF



 


NET
ELEMENT INTERNATIONAL, INC.


(THE
“CORPORATION”)






transferable on the
books of the Corporation in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed. This certificate
is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar. Witness the seal of the Corporation and
the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers.


 


Dated:


[Corporate Seal]


Delaware


 


	 	 	 
	Secretary	 	President


 



    	 



    	 



    

 


NET ELEMENT INTERNATIONAL, INC.


The following abbreviations, when used in
the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable
laws or regulations:


 


	TEN COM	 	—	  as tenants in common	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT —	
                         
        Custodian                  

        

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	TEN ENT	 	—	  as tenants by the entireties	 	
            (Cust)                           
        (Minor)

        

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	JT TEN	 	—	  as joint tenants with right	 	under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act____
	 	 	 	  of survivorship and not as tenants in 	 	 
	 	 	 	  common 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	(State)


Additional abbreviations may also be used
though not in the above list.


 


For value received,                                                             
hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto





(PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER(S)
OF ASSIGNEE(S))


________________________________


________________________________


 ________________________________ 


(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES), INCLUDING
ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE(S))


________________________________


                                                                                
Shares of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably
constitutes and appoints ________________________________Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named
Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. 


 


Dated: _______________


  


NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE(S) TO THIS ASSIGNMENT
MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT
OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.


Signature(s) Guaranteed:


                                                             


 


 THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR
INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE
MEDALLION PROGRAM, PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2127

H. JAY SPIEGEL & ASSOCIATES, P.C.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

STEVEN M. SPIEGEL,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior

District Judge. (1:08-cv-00949-JCC-TRJ)

Submitted: October 14, 2010 Decided: November 8, 2010

Before DUNCAN, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

H. Jay Spiegel, Appellant Pro Se. Steven M. Spiegel, Appellee 

Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

H. Jay Spiegel appeals the district court’s order 

entering judgment against him on his trademark infringement

claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. H. Jay Spiegel & Assocs. v. Spiegel, No. 1:08-

cv-00949-JCC-TRJ (E.D. Va. Aug. 26, 2009). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 1025.300 General.

Insurance companies are subject to the reporting requirements set forth and cross referenced in this subpart. Insurance companies should also refer to subpart C of part 1010 of this chapter for reporting requirements contained in that subpart which apply to insurance companies.
V

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1009

For the relief of Lloyd B. Gamble.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 21, 1995

Mr. DAVIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Lloyd B. Gamble.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS.

4 (a) PAYMENT.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall

5 pay, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise ap6 propriated, to Lloyd B. Gamble of Fairfax, Virginia, the

7 sum of $253,488.

8 (b) BASIS.—The payment required by subsection (a)

9 shall be to compensate Lloyd B. Gamble for the injuries

10 sustained by him as a result of the administration to him,

11 without his knowledge, of lysergic acid diethylamide by

12 United States Army personnel in 1957.
2

•HR 1009 IH

1 SEC. 2. SATISFACTION OF CLAIMS.

2 The payment made pursuant to section 1 shall be in

3 full satisfaction of all claims Lloyd B. Gamble may have

4 against the United States for any injury described in such

5 section.

6 SEC. 3. INELIGIBILITY FOR ADDITIONAL BENEFITS.

7 Upon payment of the sum referred to in section 1,

8 Lloyd B. Gamble shall not be eligible for any compensa9 tion or benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs

10 or the Department of Defense for any injury described in

11 such section.

12 SEC. 4. LIMITATION OF AGENTS AND ATTORNEYS FEES.

13 It shall be unlawful for an amount of more than 10

14 percent of the amount paid pursuant to section 1 to be

15 paid to or received by any agent or attorney for any service

16 rendered to Lloyd B. Gamble in connection with the bene17 fits provided by this Act. Any person who violates this sec18 tion shall be guilty of an infraction and shall be subject

19 to a fine in the amount provided in title 18, United States

20 Code.

Æ