alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1025 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1025

     To rescind the Federal implementation plan promulgated by the 
  Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency for the South 
          Coast, Ventura, and Sacramento areas of California.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 23, 1995

   Mr. Bilbray (for himself, Mr. Kim, Mr. Moorhead, Mr. Dreier, Mr. 
 Cunningham, Mr. Packard, Mr. Cox of California, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. 
Dornan, Mr. Royce, Mr. McKeon, Mr. Thomas, Mr. Baker of California, Mr. 
    Doolittle, Mr. Herger, Mr. Radanovich, Mr. Bono, Mr. Riggs, Mr. 
 Gallegly, Mr. Calvert, Mrs. Seastrand, Mr. Horn, Mr. Pombo, Mr. Lewis 
of California, and Mr. Hunter) introduced the following bill; which was 
                 referred to the Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To rescind the Federal implementation plan promulgated by the 
  Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency for the South 
          Coast, Ventura, and Sacramento areas of California.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FEDERAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR CERTAIN AREAS IN CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Congressional Findings.--The Congress finds that the 1990 
amendments to the Clean Air Act (Public Law 101-549) superseded prior 
requirements of the Clean Air Act regarding the demonstration of 
attainment of national ambient air quality standards and eliminated the 
obligation of the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency 
to promulgate a Federal implementation plan under section 110(c) of the 
Clean Air Act for the South Coast, Ventura, or Sacramento areas of 
California.
    (b) Effect of FIP.--Upon the enactment of this Act, any Federal 
implementation plan that has been promulgated by the Administrator of 
the Environmental Protection Agency under the Clean Air Act for the 
South Coast, Ventura, or Sacramento areas of California pursuant to a 
court order or settlement agreement shall be rescinded and shall have 
no further force and effect.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.2



Certification of Vice President Finance & Administration,
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform
and Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Jeffrey L. Garon, the Vice President
Finance & Administration, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. (the "Company"),
hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2002, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.2 (the "Periodic Report"),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and
2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period
covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered
by the Periodic Report.

Dated: November 13, 2002.







| |                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | By: /s/ JEFFREY L. GARON

                                    Jeffrey L. Garon
Vice President Finance & Administration,
                                       Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.9001-2 Definitions. The terms enumerated in this section are to be defined for the purposes of §§ 301.9001-1, 301.9001-2, and 301.9001-3 in the following manner: ( a ) “Barrel” means 42 United States gallons at 60 degrees Fahrenheit.
( b ) “Oil” means petroleum, including crude oil or any fraction or residue therefrom, and natural gas condensate, except that the term does not include natural gas.
( c ) “Person” means an individual, firm, corporation, association, partnership, consortium, joint venture, or governmental entity.
( d ) “Outer Continental Shelf” means all submerged lands lying seaward and outside of the area of lands beneath navigable waters as defined in section 1301 of title 43 and of which the subsoil and seabed appertain to the United States and are subject to its jurisdiction and control;
(Sec. 302(d) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act Amendments of 1978 (92 Stat. 672) and sec. 7805 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (68A Stat. 917; 26 U.S.C. 7805))
[T.D. 7697, 45 FR 33976, May 21, 1980]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1014 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1014

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 15, 1995

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
      To authorize extension of time limitation for a FERC-issued 
                         hydroelectric license.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
the time limitation of section 13 of the Federal Power Act, the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, upon the request of the licensee for FERC 
Project No. 3701, is authorized, in accordance with the good faith, due 
diligence, and public interest requirements 
of section 13 and the Commission's procedures under such section, to 
extend the time required for the licensee to commence the construction 
of such project for up to a maximum of 3 consecutive 2-year periods. 
This section shall take effect for the project upon the expiration of 
the extension (issued by the Commission under section 13) of the period 
required for commencement of construction of such project. If the 
license for FERC Project 3701 should expire prior to the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Commission is authorized and directed to 
reinstate effective June 1, 1995, the license previously issued for 
such project.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 13, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### Laura E. Feitner, Appellant, v Town of Smithtown et al., Respondents.

[808 NYS2d 93]

*432In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Oliver, J.), dated January 13, 2005, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Although the defendants’ motion for summary judgment was technically premature since issue had not yet been joined *(see*CPLR 3212 [a]), under the particular facts of this case, where the plaintiff was clearly on notice that the motion was made pursuant to CPLR 3212, submitted opposition papers thereto, and “ ‘deliberately charter[ed] a summary judgment course,’ ” the Supreme Court properly entertained the motion *(Hickey v Travelers Ins. Co.,*158 AD2d 112, 114 [1990], quoting *Four Seasons Hotels v Vinnik,*127 AD2d 310, 320 [1987]; Siegel, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C3212:12, at 21).

On the merits, the Supreme Court correctly granted the motion dismissing the complaint *(see*Workers’ Compensation Law § 29 [6]). The plaintiff and the defendant Thomas J. Karthaus were acting within the scope of their employment, as co-employees, at the time of the subject accident *(see Macchirole v Giamboi,*97 NY2d 147, 150 [2001]; *Roman v Ainechi,*15 AD3d 562 [2005]). Thus, workers’ compensation is the plaintiff’s exclusive remedy and she is barred from maintaining this action.

The plaintiffs remaining contentions are without merit. H. Miller, J.P., Krausman, Rivera and Dillon, JJ., concur.
APPLICATION 

UNDER THE 

SMALL 

COMMUNITY 

AIR 

SERVICE 

DEVELOPMENT 

PROGRAM

SIOUX 

GATEWAY 

AIRPORT / COL. BUD 

DAY FIELD

Summary Information

A. Applicant Information:

X Not a Consortium Interstate Consortium Intrastate Consortium

X Community now receives EAS subsidy

X

Community (or Consortium member) previously received a Small 

Community Grant; If previous recipient,

Date of grant: Sep 2004 Oct 2010

Expiration date of grant: Sep 2006 May 2012

Federal funds requested: $609,800 $500,000

Carrier(s) service obtained: N/A N/A

Destination(s) served: N/A N/A

B. Public/Private Partnerships:

Public Private

1. City of Sioux City 1. The Siouxland Initiative

2. Sioux Gateway Airport/Col. Bud 

Day Field

2. Siouxland Chamber of Commerce

C. Project Proposal:

X Marketing Start-Up Cost Offset

Travel Bank Secure Additional Service

Surface Transportation New Route

Launch New Carrier Subsidy

X Study Revenue Guarantee

Upgrade Aircraft First Service

Service Restoration

Other (explain below): Regional Service

D. Existing Landing Aids at Local Airport:

X Full ILS X Published Instrument Approach

Localizer Outer/Middle Marker

Other (specify):

E. Project Cost:

Line Description

Sub

Total

Total

Amount

1 Federal amount requested $160,000

2 State cash financial contribution $28,000

Local cash financial contribution

3a Airport cash funds $7,000

3b Non-airport cash funds $5,000

3 Total local cash funds (3a+3b) $12,000

4 TOTAL CASH FUNDING (1+2+3) $200,000

In-Kind contribution

5a Airport In-Kind contribution** $0

5b Other In-Kind contribution** $40,000

5 TOTAL IN-KIND CONTRIBUTION 

(5a+5b) $40,000

6 TOTAL PROJECT COST (4+5) $240,000

F. In-Kind Contributions:

For funds in lines 5a (Airport In-Kind contribution) and 5b (Other In-Kind contribution), 

please describe the source(s) of fund(s) for each.

5b. 25% match from local media outlets that are part of the publicprivate partnership.

G. Is this application subject to review by State under Executive Order 

12372 process?

a. This application was made available to the State under the Executive 

Order 12372. Process for review on (date) _____________.

b. Program is subject to E.O. 12372, but has not been selected for 

review.

c. Program is not covered by E.O. 12372.

H. Is the Applicant delinquent on any Federal debt? (if “yes”, provide 

explanation)

No

Yes (explain)

X

X
February 22, 2011

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2007-28819

Mr. Jackson Seltzer

Continental Airlines 17441 John F. Kennedy Boulevard Houston, TX 77032

Dear Mr. Seltzer:

On August 7, 2007, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) granted Continental Airlines (Continental) an exemption from §§ 121.391(a) and 121.393(b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). Exemption No. 9460 allowed Continental to substitute a pilot for one required flight attendant crewmember during boarding at an intermediate stop and to reduce the number of required flight attendants on board during the deplaning of passengers at an intermediate stop, subject to certain conditions and limitations. This exemption terminated on August 31, 2009.

On the date the exemption was scheduled to terminate, the FAA was actively engaged in rulemaking regarding revisions to crewmember requirements when passengers are onboard an airplane. The FAA found it appropriate to extend the exemption while rulemaking efforts were completed. Therefore, in a letter dated June 11, 2009, the FAA extended the termination date of Exemption No. 9460 to August 31, 2011, unless sooner superseded or

rescinded.

On November 5, 2010, the FAA published a final rule (Crewmember Requirements When Passengers are Onboard) regarding crewmember requirements when passengers are onboard an airplane, which became effective January 4, 2011 (75 FR 68189) (copy enclosed). The final rule substantially addresses the relief granted in Exemption No. 9460. Therefore, the FAA is rescinding Exemption No. 9460A on April 29, 2011.2 A copy of this letter will be placed onto the docket (Docket No. FAA-2007-28819).

Sincerely,

/s/ Raymond Towles Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service

Enclosure3 Project No.: AFS-09-238-E

Project Officer: _______________

ARM-101:KJones:02/04/2011:Doc#31939 ARM-1/100/101:Program Office AFS-200

Statistics: Continental Airlines Supplemental Letter.DOC, 271 words Original, 04 Feb 2011 10:29 Style Index 33 Good for a Legal Document Average Sentence Length 18 Excellent

Passive Index 33 Excellent

MR JACKSON SELTZER

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES

17441 JOHN F KENNEDY BOULEVARD

HOUSTON TX 77032
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                          
<ARTICLE>                      5
                                
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                           335,441
<SECURITIES>                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                           0
<INVENTORY>                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       0
<PP&E>                         19,331,038
<DEPRECIATION>                 4,361,603
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 15,390,689
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  0
<BONDS>                        5,580,272
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<COMMON>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                             0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   15,390,689
<SALES>                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 764,371
<CGS>                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    695,631
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               110,013
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (41,273)
<INCOME-TAX>                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                     (41,273)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      (2.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (2.50)
        

</TABLE>
file:///J|/INITENG/P13%20cases/p130455.eng.txt[7/2/2013 7:20:48 AM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0455 Focus Ready Draft 6/6/2013 ENGINEER: Arnold \ DDH PV (kg/yr): SUBMITTER: Henkel Corporation

MSDS: Yes Label: No Gen Eqpt: Use chemical resistant, impermeable clothing including gloves and either an apron or body suit to prevent skin contact. Neoprene, Butyl-rubber, or nitrile-rubber gloves./ Chemical splash goggles or safety glasses with side shields. Full face protection should be used if the potential for splashing or spraying of product exists/ Local exhaust ventilation is recommended when general ventilation is not sufficient to control airborne contamination Respirator: Use a NIOSH approved respirator if ventilation is inadequate Health Effects: causes eye, skin and respiratory tract irritation/ may cause allergic skin and respiratory reaction/ may be harmful is swallowed, absorbed through skin or inhaled| irritant to skin/ eyes/ lungs/ mucous membrane TLV/PEL: none establishedfile:///J|/INITENG/P13%20cases/p130455.eng.txt[7/2/2013 7:20:48 AM] SAT (concerns) (05/29/2013): Migration to groundwater: Slow to moderate PBT rating: P2B1T1 Health: 1-2 Dermal, Inhalation Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 1 ppb) OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1B NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.file:///J|/INITENG/P13%20cases/p130455.eng.txt[7/2/2013 7:20:48 AM] EXPOSURE -BASED REVIEW: No INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0455file:///J|/INITENG/P13%20cases/p130455.eng.txt[7/2/2013 7:20:48 AM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0455file:///J|/INITENG/P13%20cases/p130455.eng.txt[7/2/2013 7:20:48 AM]file:///J|/INITENG/P13%20cases/p130455.eng.txt[7/2/2013 7:20:48 AM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0455file:///J|/INITENG/P13%20cases/p130455.eng.txt[7/2/2013 7:20:48 AM] CBI: Yes MEMORANDUM of CBI TELEPHONE CONVERSATION CALL BY: Daryl Hudson Organization: ERG for EPA/OPPT/CEB CALL TO: Timothy Pratt Organization: Henkel Corporation Date: 05/30/2013 Time: 11:30 AM
Concerning what TSCA CBI? PMN: 13-0455file:///J|/INITENG/P13%20cases/p130455.eng.txt[7/2/2013 7:20:48 AM]
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merit Medical Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”), I, Kent W. Stanger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:   May 9, 2011 | /s/   Kent W. Stanger           |
|--------------------------|---------------------------------|
|                     | Kent   W. Stanger               |
|                     | Chief   Financial Officer       |
|                     | (principal   financial officer) |

 

This certification accompanies the foregoing Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Registrant for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
#### §§ 1060.100-1060.200 [Reserved]
#### § 1023.400 General.

Brokers or dealers in securities are subject to the recordkeeping requirements set forth and cross referenced in this subpart. Brokers or dealers in securities should also refer to subpart D of part 1010 of this chapter for recordkeeping requirements contained in that subpart which apply to brokers or dealers in securities.
IA

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 149

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1996, and for

other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 3, 1996

Mr. OBEY introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Appropriations

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

1996, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 106(c) of Public Law 104–56 is amended by

4 striking ‘‘December 15, 1995’’ and inserting ‘‘August 31,

5 1996’’.

Æ
INVENTORY EXPERT SERVICE REPORT

Please print the above CA Index Name on the appropriate page of your PMN.

If this box is checked, CAS has made correction(s) marked in red to your IES order. 

Please make the same corrections to your PMN before submitting it to the EPA.

A	division	of	the	American	Chemical	Society	 Phone:	800-631-1884,	614-447-3870

Fax:	614-447-3747

E-mail: answers@cas.org

Web: www.cas.org/products/other-cas-products/client-services/

InventoryExpertService

CAS					•					2540 Olentangy River Road					•					P.O. Box 3343					•					Columbus, OH		43210-0334					•					USA

,(62UGHU1XPEHU

5HJLVWU\1XPEHU

&$,QGH[1DPH

3\ULGLQHFDUER[\OLFDFLGWULFKORUR
Employment Letter Agreement between NewPage Corp. and Douglas K. Cooper



 EXHIBIT 10.20 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 TO 
 EMPLOYMENT LETTER AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment No. 1 is made effective as of January 28, 2007, and modifies and amends the Employment Letter Agreement dated November 1, 2005 (“Agreement”) between NewPage
Corporation (“Company”) and Douglas K. Cooper (“Executive”). Terms defined in the Agreement have the same meaning when used in this Amendment unless otherwise indicated. For good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged, Company and Executive agree as follows: 
  

	1.	Section 2(c) of the Agreement is amended in its entirety to read as follows: 

 “(c) Annual Bonus. For performance periods during the Term, Executive will be entitled to participate in the NewPage Corporation management incentive or bonus plan or plans approved annually by the Board
of Directors of the Company (the “Annual Incentive Plan”). Executive’s target bonus will be 45% of Base Salary for achieving targets set annually pursuant to the terms the Annual Incentive Plan. Each annual bonus (“Annual
Bonus”) will be paid on or before March 15th of the year following the tax year in which the relevant services required for payment have been performed. There will be no cap on the amount of any Annual Bonus.” 
  

	2.	Except as modified by this Amendment, the Agreement remains in full force and effect. 

  


					
	Company:	 	Executive:
	NewPage Corporation	 	
			
	By:	 	 /s/ Mark A. Suwyn
	 	 /s/ Douglas K. Cooper

		 		 	Douglas K. Cooper
	Title:	 	Chairman and CEO