alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1127 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1127

        To limit the issuance of patents on medical procedures.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 3, 1995

 Mr. Ganske (for himself and Mr. Wyden) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To limit the issuance of patents on medical procedures.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medical Procedures Innovation and 
Affordability Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON ISSUANCE OF PATENTS.

    On or after the date of the enactment of this Act, a patent may not 
be issued for any invention or discovery of a technique, method, or 
process for performing a surgical or medical procedure, administering a 
surgical or medical therapy, or making a medical diagnosis, except that 
if the technique, method, or process is performed by or as a necessary 
component of a machine, manufacture, or composition of matter or 
improvement thereof which is itself patentable subject matter, the 
patent on such machine, manufacture, or composition of matter may claim 
such technique, method, or process.
                                 <all>
```
www.gpo.gov

### §286e–7. Supplementary Financing Facility

#### (a) Availability of resources

For the purpose of participation of the United States in the Supplementary Financing Facility (hereinafter referred to as the “facility”) established by the decision numbered 5508–(77/127) of the Executive Directors of the Fund, the Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to make resources available as provided in the decision numbered 5509–(77/127) of the Fund, in an amount not to exceed the equivalent of 1,450 million Special Drawing Rights.

#### (b) Adjustments in the value of monetary assets

The Secretary of the Treasury shall account, through the fund established by section 5302 of title 31, for any adjustment in the value of monetary assets held by the United States in respect of United States participation in the facility.

#### (c) Authorization of appropriations

Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, the authority of the Secretary to enter into agreements making resources available under this section shall be limited to such amounts as are appropriated in advance in appropriation Acts. Effective October 1, 1978, there are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of the Treasury, without fiscal year limitation, such sums as are necessary to carry out subsection (a) of this section, but not to exceed an amount of dollars equivalent to 1,450 million Special Drawing Rights.

(July 31, 1945, ch. 339, §28, as added Pub. L. 95–435, §1, Oct. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 1051.)

#### Codification

In subsec. (b), “section 5302 of title 31” substituted for “section 10 of the Gold Reserve Act of 1934, as amended (31 U.S.C. 822a)” on authority of Pub. L. 97–258, §4(b), Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1067, the first section of which enacted Title 31, Money and Finance.
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 21, 2015

No. 04-15-00020-CR

Corey DENTS,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR7707

Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The trial court’s certification states that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has 

NO right of appeal” and “defendant has waived the right of appeal.” We therefore ORDER the

trial court clerk to file, within ten days of the date of this order, a clerk’s record containing the 

following documents:

1. All pre-trial motions and the orders on those motions, if any;

2. all documents relating to the defendant’s plea bargain, including the 

court’s admonishments, the defendant’s waiver and consent to stipulation 

of testimony, and any other stipulations;

3. the judgment;

4. all post-judgment motions and the orders on those motions, if any;

5. the notice(s) of appeal;

6. the trial court’s certification of defendant’s right of appeal; 

7. the criminal docket sheet; and

8. the bill of costs.
All other appellate deadlines are suspended pending further order of this court. The clerk of this 

court is ORDERED to send a copy of this order to the attorneys of record, the trial court clerk, 

and the court reporter(s) responsible for preparing the reporter’s record in this appeal.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of January, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 35 (Thursday, February 21, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 12056]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-04028]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9783-1]

National Environmental Education Advisory Council

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of meeting(s).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, EPA gives notice of 
a series of teleconference meetings of the National Environmental 
Education Advisory Council (NEEAC). The NEEAC was created by Congress 
to advise, consult with, and make recommendations to the Administrator 
of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on matters related to 
activities, functions and policies of EPA under the National 
Environmental Education Act (the Act).
    The purpose of these teleconference(s) is to discuss specific 
topics of relevance for consideration by the council in order to 
provide advice and insights to the Agency on environmental education.

DATES: The National Environmental Education Advisory Council will hold 
a public teleconference(s) on Wednesday, February 27, 2013, March 27, 
2013, May 22, 2013, June 19, 2013 and July 24, 2013, from 12:00 p.m. 
until 1:00 p.m. Eastern Time.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Javier Araujo, Designated Federal 
Officer, araujo.javier@epa.gov, 202-564-2642, U.S. EPA, Office of 
Environmental Education, Ariel Rios North Room 1426, 1200 Pennsylvania 
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Members of the public wishing to gain access 
to the teleconference, make brief oral comments, or provide a written 
statement to the NEEAC must contact Javier Araujo, Designated Federal 
Officer, at araujo.javier@epa.gov or 202-564-2642 by 10 business days 
prior to each regularly scheduled meeting.
    Meeting Access: For information on access or services for 
individuals with disabilities or to request accommodations please 
contact Javier Araujo at araujo.javier@epa.gov or 202-564-2642, 
preferably at least 10 days prior to the meeting, to give EPA as much 
time as possible to process your request.

Stephanie Owens,
Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of External Affairs and 
Environmental Education.
[FR Doc. 2013-04028 Filed 2-20-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-24-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-27-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-27-2000
<CASH>                                          12,679
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  117,330
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     72,870
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               243,383
<PP&E>                                       1,251,221
<DEPRECIATION>                                 884,026
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 904,433
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          199,750
<BONDS>                                        362,100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           442
<OTHER-SE>                                     309,749
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   904,433
<SALES>                                         19,367
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               241,998
<CGS>                                           15,811
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  158,574
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,035
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 33,161
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,932
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,229
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,229
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .58


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of JACOBS  FINANCIAL  GROUP,  INC. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended  November 30, 2010 (the  "Report")
filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission,  I, John M. Jacobs,  Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The  Company's  Report  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



Date: January 19, 2011


                                 /s/John M. Jacobs
                                 ----------------------------------------
                                 John M. Jacobs,  Chief Executive Officer
                                 and Chief Financial Officer
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o
. 0 9

- 5 0 5 2 8 C o n f e r e n c e C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v
. M A R C E L I N O M O N D R A G O N

- F I G U E R O A , a l s o k n o w n a s J a v i e r P e r e z , D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e W e s t e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o
. 1 : 0 9

- C R

- 8 9

- 1

B e f o r e S M I T H , P R A D O , a n d H A Y N E S , C i r c u i t J u d g e s
. P E R C U R I A M : *
T h e F e d e r a l P u b l i c D e f e n d e r a p p o i n t e d t o r e p r e s e n t M a r c e l i n o M o n d r a g o n - F i g u e r o a h a s m o v e d f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w a n d h a s f i l e d a b r i e f i n

a c c o r d a n c e w i t h A n d e r s v
. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. M o n d r a g o n - F i g u e r o a h a s n o t f

i l e d a r e s p o n s e
. O u r i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w o f t h e r e c o r d a n d c o u n s e l ’ s b r i e f d i s c l o s e s n o n o n f r i v o l o u s i s s u e f

o r a p p e a l

. A c c o r d i n g l y , c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a n d t h e A P P E A L I S D I S M I S S E D

. S e e 5 T H C I R

. R

. 4 2

. 2

. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D April 20 , 20 10 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R
. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 09-50528 Document: 00511086250 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2010
§ 100.5 Mutilated paper currency. ( a ) *General.* Lawfully held mutilated paper currency of the United States may be submitted for examination in accord with the provisions in this subpart. Such currency may be redeemed at face amount if sufficient remnants of any relevant security feature and clearly more than one-half of the original note remains. Fragments of such mutilated currency which are not clearly more than one-half of the original whole note or are lacking sufficient remnants of any relevant security feature will be redeemed at face value only if the Director, Bureau of Engraving and Printing, Department of the Treasury, is satisfied that the missing portions have been totally destroyed. The Director's judgment shall be based on such evidence of total destruction as is necessary and shall be final. Any submission under this subpart shall be deemed an acceptance of all provisions contained herein.
( b ) *Definitions.* The following definitions are used in this subpart: *Mutilated currency* is currency which has been damaged to the extent that: ( i ) One-half or less of the original note remains; or
( ii ) Its condition is such that its value is questionable and the currency must be forwarded to the Department of the Treasury for the examination by trained experts before any redemption is made.
*Unfit currency* is currency which is unfit for further circulation because of its physical condition such as torn, dirty, limp, worn or defaced. Unfit currency should not be forwarded to the Department of the Treasury, but may be exchanged at commercial banks.
#### § 13.5 Utilization of the services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of State and local governments.

The Assistant Secretary may decide to utilize, on a reimbursable basis, the services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of State and local governments of the affected metropolitan area desiring to provide protection, or he may utilize the United States Secret Service Uniformed Division, or both. If the United States Secret Service Uniformed Division is utilized to meet all the extraordinary protective need, the governments of the affected metropolitan area will not be reimbursed. If the United States Secret Service Uniformed Division is utilized to meet part of the extraordinary protective needs, the governments of the affected metropolitan area will be reimbursed for that qualifying portion of the protection which is provided by State and local police authorities. If the Assistant Secretary decides to utilize, with their consent, the services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of such State and local governments to meet the extraordinary protective need, he will so notify the government as soon as possible after receipt of a request for protection or an advance notice of a reimbursement request made pursuant to § 13.4.

[45 FR 30622, May 9, 1980]
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2019259EN.01008601.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 10.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 259/86 |

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1688 of 8 October 2019 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and definitively collecting the provisional duty imposed on imports of mixtures of urea and ammonium nitrate originating in Russia, Trinidad and Tobago and the United States of America

(Official Journal of the European Union L 258 of 9 October 2019)

On page 62, recital 301:

for:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(301) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 15(1) of the basic Regulation,’, |

read:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(301) | The Committee established by Article 15(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 did not deliver an opinion,’. |

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SWIFT ENERGY
MANAGED PENSION ASSETS PARTNERSHIP 1989-2 LTD'S BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS CONTAINED IN ITS FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEP-30-1996.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,406
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,214
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                47,620
<PP&E>                                       1,527,868
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,132,296)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 443,192
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,847
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     440,345
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   443,192
<SALES>                                        155,824
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               155,904
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   63,631<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 66,364
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             66,364
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    66,364
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES LEASE OPERATING EXPENSES, PRODUCTION TAXES AND DEPRECIATION AND
AMORTIZATION EXPENSE. EXCLUDES GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE AND INTEREST EXPENSE.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
§ 11.7 Enforcement procedures. ( a ) The State licensing agency shall attempt to resolve day-to-day problems pertaining to the operation of the vending facility in an informal manner with the participation of the blind vendor and the on-site property management officials of the respective Treasury bureaus who are responsible for the Treasury-controlled property.
( b ) Unresolved disagreements concerning the terms of the permit, the Act, or the regulations in this part and any other unresolved matters shall be reported in writing to the State licensing agency supervisory personnel by the bureau on-site supervisory property management official in an attempt to resolve the issue.
#### § 12.1 Purpose.

This part contains regulations implementing the “Prohibition of Cigarette Sales to Minors in Federal Buildings Act,” Public Law 104-52, Section 636, with respect to buildings under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Treasury.
#### Rose Schwartz, Respondent, v City of New York, Respondent, and Keyspan Energy Corporation, Appellant.

[804 NYS2d 684]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Keyspan Energy Corporation appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Fartnow, J.), dated May 28, 2004, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint and all cross claims are dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellant, and the action against the remaining defendant is severed.

The appellant met its burden of proving, prima facie, that it did not create the allegedly dangerous condition upon which the plaintiff tripped and fell, and the plaintiff failed to raise any triable issue of fact in opposition *(see Verdes v Brooklyn Union Gas Co.,*253 AD2d 552 [1998]; *Curci v City of New York,*240 AD2d 460 [1997]). Accordingly, the appellant’s motion for summary judgment should have been granted. Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Krausman and Covello, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
      32.2







ICONIX
      BRAND GROUP, INC.




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF




THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Iconix Brand Group, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 (the "Report"), I, Warren
      Clamen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.






/s/
      Warren
      Clamen


Warren
      Clamen


Chief
      Financial Officer




Date:
      November 7, 2006
§ 16.33 Witnesses. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, testimony at the hearing shall be given orally by witnesses under oath or affirmation.
( b ) At the discretion of the ALJ, testimony may be admitted in the form of a written statement or deposition. Any such written statement must be provided to all other parties along with the last known address of such witness, in a manner which allows sufficient time for other parties to subpoena such witness for cross-examination at the hearing. Prior written statements of witnesses proposed to testify at the hearing and deposition transcripts shall be exchanged as provided in § 16.22(a).
( c ) The ALJ shall exercise reasonable control over the mode and order of interrogating witnesses and presenting evidence so as to— ( 1 ) Make the interrogation and presentation effective for the ascertainment of the truth,
( 2 ) Avoid needless consumption of time, and
( 3 ) Protect witnesses from harassment or undue embarrassment.
( d ) The ALJ shall permit the parties to conduct such cross examination as may be required for a full and true disclosure of the facts.
( e ) At the discretion of the ALJ, a witness may be cross-examined on matters relevant to the proceeding without regard to the scope of his or her direct examination. To the extent permited by the ALJ, cross-examination on matters outside the scope of direct examination shall be conducted in the manner of direct examination and may proceed by leading questions only if the witness is a hostile witness, an adverse party, or a witness identified with an adverse party.
( f ) Upon motion of any party, the ALJ shall order witnesses excluded so that they cannot hear the testimony of other witnesses. This rule does not authorize exclusion of— ( 1 ) A party who is an individual;
( 2 ) In the case of a party that is not an individual, an officer or employee of the party designated by the party's representative; or
( 3 ) An individual whose presence is shown by a party to be essential to the presentation of its case, including an individual employed by the Government engaged in assisting the representative for the Government.