Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 158 / Tuesday, August 18, 2009 / Notices 41679 

*An SME is defined as a firm with 500 or fewer 

employees or that otherwise qualifies as a small 

business under SBA regulations (see http:// 

www.sba.gov/services/contracting opportunities/ 

sizestandardstopics/index.html). Parent companies, 

affiliates, and subsidiaries will be considered when 

determining business size. The dual pricing 

schedule reflects the Commercial Service’s user fee 

schedule that became effective May 1, 2008 (for 

additional information see http://www.export.gov/

newsletter/march2008/initiatives.html). 

• Participation in industry receptions 

in New Delhi and Chennai and a 

financing roundtable luncheon in 

Mumbai; and 

• Meetings with CS India’s energy 

efficiency industry specialists in New 

Delhi, Chennai and Mumbai. 

Proposed Mission Timetable 

Companies will be encouraged to 

arrive Saturday to allow time to rest 

after their long trip and adjust to the 

time change before the mission program 

begins on Monday, November 16. 

Monday November 16 ................. New Delhi Welcome briefing by U.S. Departments of Commerce and State, Participation in DOE/AID

Energy Efficiency Conference, One-on-one business matchmaking appointments, Networking reception. 

Tuesday November 17 ................. New Delhi Participation in DOE/AID Energy Efficiency Conference, One-on-one business matchmaking appointments. 

Wednesday November 18 ........... New Delhi/Chennai Morning flight to Chennai, One-on-one business matchmaking appointments, 

Networking reception. 

Thursday November 19 ............... Chennai/Mumbai One-on-one business matchmaking appointments, Optional site visit, Evening flight 

to Mumbai. 

Friday November 20 .................... Mumbai One-on-one business matchmaking appointments, Roundtable on financing mechanisms for

energy efficiency projects in India. 

Participation Requirements 

All parties interested in participating 

in the Energy Efficiency Trade Mission 

to India must complete and submit an 

application for consideration by the 

Department of Commerce. All 

applicants will be evaluated on their 

ability to meet certain conditions and 

best satisfy the selection criteria as 

outlined below. The mission will be 

open on a first come first served basis 

to 12 qualified U.S. companies. 

Fees and Expenses: 

After a company has been selected to 

participate on the mission, a payment to 

the Department of Commerce in the 

form of a participation fee is required. 

The participation fee will be $3,500 for 

small or medium-sized enterprises 

(SME),* and $4,200 for large firms, 

which includes one principal 

representative. The fee for each 

additional firm representative (large 

firm or SME) is $750. Expenses for 

lodging, some meals, incidentals, and 

travel (except for transportation to and 

from airports in-country, previously 

noted) will be the responsibility of each 

mission participant. The conference fee 

is included in the trade mission cost. 

Conditions for Participation: 

• An applicant must submit a 

completed and signed mission 

application and supplemental 

application materials, including 

adequate information on the company’s 

products and/or services, primary 

market objectives, and goals for 

participation. 

• Each applicant must also certify 

that the products and services it seeks 

to export through the mission are either 

produced in the United States, or, if not, 

marketed under the name of a U.S. firm 

and have at least fifty-one percent U.S. 

content. 

Selection Criteria for Participation: 

Selection will be based on the 

following criteria: 

• Suitability of a company’s products 

or services to the mission’s goals 

• Applicant’s potential for business 

in India, including likelihood of exports 

resulting from the trade mission 

• Consistency of the applicant’s goals 

and objectives with the stated scope of 

the trade mission 

Any partisan political activities 

(including political contributions) of an 

applicant are entirely irrelevant to the 

selection process. 

Timeframe for Recruitment and 

Applications 

Mission recruitment will be 

conducted in an open and public 

manner, including publication in the 

Federal Register, posting on the 

Commerce Department trade mission 

calendar (http://www.ita.doc.gov/

doctm/tmcal.html) and other Internet 

Web sites, press releases to general and 

trade media, direct mail, notices by 

industry trade associations and other 

multiplier groups, and publicity at 

industry meetings, symposia, 

conferences, and trade shows. 

Recruitment for the mission will begin 

immediately and conclude no later than 

September 30, 2009. The mission will 

be open on a first come first served 

basis. Applications received after that 

date will be considered only if space 

and scheduling constraints permit. 

Contacts: 

Houston Export Assistance Center: 

Ms. Nyamusi Igambi, 

Nyamusi.Igambi@mail.doc.gov, Ph: 

713–209–3112, Fax: 713–209–3135. 

U.S. Commercial Service in India: Mr. 

Vaidyanathan Purushothaman, U.S. 

Commercial Service Chennai, Ph: 91– 

44–2857–4031, Fax: 91–44–2857–4212, 

Vaidyanathan.purushothaman

@mail.doc.gov. 

Sean Timmins, 

Global Trade Programs, Commercial Service 

Trade Missions Program. 

[FR Doc. E9–19777 Filed 8–17–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–FP–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–863] 

Seventh Administrative Review of 

Honey From the People’s Republic of 

China: Extension of Time Limit for the 

Preliminary Results 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: August 18, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Blaine Wiltse, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 9, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, 

Washington DC 20230; telephone- (202) 

482–6345. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On February 2, 2009, the Department 

of Commerce (‘‘Department’’) published 

a notice of initiation of an 

administrative review of honey from the 

People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’), 

covering the period December 1, 2007 

through November 30, 2008. See 

Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Requests for Revocation in 

Part, 74 FR 5821 (February 2, 2009). On 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
41680 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 158 / Tuesday, August 18, 2009 / Notices 

1Sixty days from September 2, 2009, is November 

1, 2009. However, Department practice dictates that 

where a deadline falls on a weekend, the 

appropriate deadline is the next business day. See 

Notice of Clarification: Application of ‘‘Next 

Business Day’’ Rule for Administrative 

Determination Deadlines Pursuant to the Tariff Act 

of 1930, As Amended, 70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2005). 

March 6, 2009, after receiving comments 

on U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

data, the Department selected Anhui 

Native Produce Import & Export Corp. 

(‘‘Anhui Native’’) and Qinhuangdao 

Municipal Dafeng Industrial Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘QMD’’) as the mandatory respondents 

for this review. 

The Department sent its antidumping 

questionnaire to Anhui Native and QMD 

on March 9, 2009. The Department was 

unable to deliver its questionnaire to 

QMD due to incorrect addresses. See 

Memorandum to the File from Blaine 

Wiltse, Case Analyst, RE: Seventh 

Administrative Review of Honey from 

the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’): 

Incorrect Addresses for QMD, dated 

March 27, 2009. On March 30, 2009, 

Dongtai Peak Honey Industry Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Dongtai Peak’’) requested treatment as 

a voluntary respondent, and submitted 

its Section A response to the 

Department. On April 13, 2009, the 

Department selected Dongtai Peak as a 

voluntary respondent for this review. 

On April 14, 2009, Dongtai Peak 

submitted its Sections C and D response 

to the Department. On April 15, 2009, 

Anhui Native withdrew its participation 

from the current review. On June 8, 

2009, and June 16, 2009, the Department 

sent its Supplemental Sections A, C, 

and D Questionnaire and its Importer 

Specific Supplemental Questionnaire to 

Dongtai Peak. On July 8, 2009, and July 

13, 2009, Dongtai Peak submitted its 

response to the Department’s Importer 

Specific Supplemental Questionnaire 

and Supplemental Sections A, C, and D 

Questionnaire. The preliminary results 

of this administrative review are 

currently due on September 2, 2009. 

Extension of Time Limit for the 

Preliminary Results 

The Department determines that 

completion of the preliminary results of 

this review within the statutory time 

period is not practicable. The 

Department requires more time to gather 

and analyze surrogate value information 

pertaining to this company. 

Additionally, the Department intends to 

provide additional time for interested 

parties to provide comments on 

supplemental questionnaires and 

suggested surrogate values. Lastly, the 

Department requires additional time to 

analyze the questionnaire responses and 

to issue additional supplemental 

questionnaires, if necessary. Therefore, 

in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(‘‘Act’’), we are extending the time 

period for issuing the preliminary 

results of review by 60 days until 

November 2, 2009.1 The final results 

continue to be due 120 days after the 

publication of the preliminary results. 

This notice is published pursuant to 

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.213(h)(2). 

Dated: August 12, 2009. 

John M. Andersen, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. E9–19780 Filed 8–17–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–201–836] 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Changed Circumstances Review: 

Light–Walled Rectangular Pipe and 

Tube From Mexico 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On June 18, 2009, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) made its preliminary 

determination that Ternium Mexico 

S.A. de C.V. (Ternium) is the successor– 

in-interest to Hylsa S.A. de C.V. (Hylsa) 

and should be treated as such for 

antidumping duty cash deposit 

purposes. See Notice of Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty Changed 

Circumstances Review: Light–Walled 

Rectangular Pipe and Tube from 

Mexico, 74 FR 28887 (June 18, 2009) 

(Preliminary Results). For purposes of 

these final results of review, the 

Department has determined that 

Ternium is the successor–in-interest to 

Hylsa and, as a result, should be 

accorded the same treatment previously 

accorded to Hylsa in regard to the 

antidumping duty order on light–walled 

rectangular pipe and tube (LWRPT) 

from Mexico as of the date of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register. 

DATES: Effective Date: August 18, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

Drury or Brian Davis, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 7, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–0195 or (202) 482– 

7924, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On September 3, 2008, Ternium 

requested that the Department conduct 

a changed circumstances review of the 

antidumping duty order of LWRPT from 

Mexico to determine whether Ternium 

is the successor–in-interest to Hylsa and 

should be treated as such for 

antidumping duty cash deposit 

purposes. See Notice of Initiation of 

Antidumping Duty Changed 

Circumstances Review: Light–Walled 

Rectangular Pipe and Tube from 

Mexico, 73 FR 63686 (October 27, 2008) 

(Notice of Initiation). On June 18, 2009, 

the Department preliminarily 

determined that Ternium is the 

successor–in-interest to Hylsa and 

should be treated as such for 

antidumping duty cash deposit 

purposes. See Preliminary Results. 

On July 13, 2009, the Department 

published in the Federal Register a 

notice extending the time limit for these 

final results to August 17, 2009. See 

Light–Walled Rectangular Pipe and 

Tube from Mexico; Extension of Time 

Limit for Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 

74 FR 33406 (July 13, 2009). 

In the Preliminary Results, we stated 

that interested parties could request a 

hearing no later than 30 days after the 

publication of the Preliminary Results, 

submit case briefs to the Department no 

later than 30 days after the publication 

of the Preliminary Results, and submit 

rebuttal briefs, limited to the issues 

raised in those case briefs, five days 

subsequent to the case briefs’ due date. 

We did not receive any hearing requests 

or comments on the Preliminary Results. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to this order 

is certain welded carbon quality light– 

walled steel pipe and tube, of 

rectangular (including square) cross 

section, having a wall thickness of less 

than 4 mm. 

The term carbon–quality steel 

includes both carbon steel and alloy 

steel which contains only small 

amounts of alloying elements. 

Specifically, the term carbon–quality 

includes products in which none of the 

elements listed below exceeds the 

quantity by weight respectively 

indicated: 1.80 percent of manganese, or 

2.25 percent of silicon, or 1.00 percent 

of copper, or 0.50 percent of aluminum, 

or 1.25 percent of chromium, or 0.30 

percent of cobalt, or 0.40 percent of 

lead, or 1.25 percent of nickel, or 0.30 

percent of tungsten, or 0.10 percent of 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES