alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 35 Introduced in House (IH)]

                                     

104d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 35

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
   provide that expenditures for a fiscal year shall neither exceed 
 revenues for such fiscal year nor 19 per centum of the Nation's gross 
national product for the last calendar year ending before the beginning 
                          of such fiscal year.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

   Mr. McCrery introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
   provide that expenditures for a fiscal year shall neither exceed 
 revenues for such fiscal year nor 19 per centum of the Nation's gross 
national product for the last calendar year ending before the beginning 
                          of such fiscal year.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Except as provided in this article, outlays of the 
United States Government for any fiscal year may not exceed its 
receipts for that fiscal year.
    ``Section 2. Expect as provided in this article, the outlays of the 
United States Government for a fiscal year may not exceed 19 per centum 
of the Nation's gross national product for that fiscal year.
    ``Section 3. The Congress may, by law, provide for suspension of 
the effect of sections 1 or 2 of this article for any fiscal year for 
which three-fifths of the whole number of each House shall provide, by 
a rollcall vote, for a specific excess of outlays over receipts or over 
19 per centum of the Nation's gross national product.
    ``Section 4. Total receipts shall include all receipts of the 
United States except those derived from borrowing and total outlays 
shall include all outlays of the United States except those for the 
repayment of debt principal.
    ``Section 5. This article shall apply to the second fiscal year 
beginning after its ratification and to subsequent fiscal years, but 
not to fiscal years beginning before October 1, 2002''.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-01-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,184,321
<SECURITIES>                                    41,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,370,342
<ALLOWANCES>                                   156,775
<INVENTORY>                                  2,197,715
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,623,629
<PP&E>                                         577,211
<DEPRECIATION>                                 223,562
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,507,189
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,657,461
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         11
<COMMON>                                         8,834
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,836,936
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,507,189
<SALES>                                      2,104,314
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,104,314
<CGS>                                        1,978,979
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,335,543
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,776
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,423
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,211,984)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       994
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,212,978)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,212,978)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6297

STEPHEN YAGMAN, 

 Petitioner – Appellant, 

 v. 

TRACY JOHNS, 

 Respondent – Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, 

District Judge. (5:08-hc-02103-D) 

Submitted: June 9, 2009 Decided: July 7, 2009 

Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Erwin Chemerinsky, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE SCHOOL OF 

LAW, Irvine, California, for Appellant. Christina Ann Thompson, 

BUREAU OF PRISONS, Butner, North Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Stephen Yagman, a federal prisoner, appeals the 

district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 

(2006) petition and denying his motion for sanctions. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Yagman 

v. Johns, No. 5:08-hc-02103-D (E.D.N.C. Feb. 12, 2009). We deny 

Yagman’s motion to schedule oral argument and dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
§ 150.4 Calculation of assessment basis. For each assessment period, the Department will calculate an assessment basis that shall be sufficient to replenish the Financial Research Fund to a level equivalent to the sum of: ( a ) Budgeted operating expenses for the OFR for the applicable assessment period;
( b ) Budgeted operating expenses for the Council for the applicable assessment period;
( c ) Budgeted capital expenses for the OFR for the 12-month period beginning on the first day of the applicable assessment period;
( d ) Budgeted capital expenses for the Council for the 12-month period beginning on the first day of the applicable assessment period; and
( e ) An amount necessary to reimburse reasonable implementation expenses of the Corporation as provided under section 210(n)(10) of the Dodd-Frank Act.
#### Caryn Rosen, Respondent, v Richard D. Moss, M.D., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

[808 NYS2d 15]

*290Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered on or about April 6, 2005, which denied defendants’ motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Triable issues of negligence and causation are raised by plaintiffs expert’s affidavit that plaintiffs complaints of missed periods warranted a blood work-up, which would have revealed elevated levels of FSH and led to discovery of the FSH-secreting pituitary tumor; that plaintiffs continued complaints of abdominal pain and distension warranted a pelvic ultrasound, which would have revealed the presence of ovarian cysts associated with the tumor; that the tumor existed for over a year prior to its discovery; and that bromocriptine has been shown to be successful in treating small FSH pituitary adenomas and avoiding the need for neurosurgery. On this record, it is possible to find that if the adenoma had been diagnosed earlier, it would have been smaller, allowing for its resection, which in turn would have stopped the formation of ovarian cysts associated with FSH secretion from the tumor and necessitating emergency gynecological surgery. Defendants’ request for a *Frye*hearing on the efficacy of bromocriptine in treating FSH-secreting pituitary adenomas does not appear to have been considered by the motion court. This is a matter for the trial court. We do note, however, that even if drug therapy were not indicated and neurosurgery were an inevitability, triable issues would remain as to defendants’ negligence, raised by evidence that blood work would have led to an earlier discovery of the tumor, permitting its surgical removal before its FSH secretion had caused the formation of ovarian cysts. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Friedman, Sullivan and Malone, JJ.
#### § 1010.200 General.

Each financial institution (as defined in 31 U.S.C. 5312(a)(2) or (c)(1)) should refer to subpart B of its chapter X Part for any additional program requirements. Unless otherwise indicated, the program requirements contained in this subpart B apply to all financial institutions (as defined in 31 U.S.C. 5312(a)(2) or (c)(1)).
IA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 17

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States allowing

an item veto in appropriations bills.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. EMERSON introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States allowing an item veto in appropriations bills.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes

6 as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legisla7 tures of three-fourths of the several States:
2

HJ 17 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE—

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. The President shall have the power to

3 disapprove any appropriation or provision and approve any

4 other appropriation or provision in the same appropriation

5 bill. In such case he shall, in signing the bill, designate

6 the appropriations and provisions disapproved; and shall

7 return a copy of such appropriations and provisions, with

8 his objections, to the House in which the bill shall have

9 originated; and the same proceedings shall then be had

10 as in case of other bills disapproved by the President.

11 ‘‘SECTION 2. This article shall be inoperative unless

12 it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Con13 stitution by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

14 States within seven years from the date of its submis15 sion.’’.

Æ
§ 48.4073-4 Other tax-free sales. ( a ) *Cross references.* For provisions relating to tax-free sales of articles referred to in section 4071, see: ( 1 ) Section 4221, relating to certain tax-free sales, and the regulations thereunder in subpart H;
( 2 ) Section 4222, relating to registration, and the regulations thereunder in subpart H;
( 3 ) Section 4223, relating to special rules pertaining to further manufacture, and the regulations thereunder in subpart H; and
( 4 ) 28 FR 348, January 12, 1963, relating to the authorization of an exemption from the tax imposed by section 4071 by the Secretary of the Treasury under section 4293 for sales of certain tires and inner tubes sold to the American Red Cross on or after March 1, 1963.
(Secs. 4071(b), 4071(c), 4073(c), and 7805, Internal Revenue Code of 1954; 80 Stat. 331, 26 U.S.C. 4071(b); 68A Stat. 482, 26 U.S.C. 4071(c); 70 Stat. 389, 26 U.S.C. 4073(c); 68A Stat. 917, 26 U.S.C. 7805)
[T.D. 7809, 47 FR 6008, Feb. 10, 1982]
Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement - John LaCorte



 Exhibit 10.23 
 January 25, 2007 
 John LaCorte 
 12014 Granite
Woods Loop 
 Venice, FL 34292 
 Re: Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement 
 Dear John: 
 This document is intended to memorialize the amendment of your Employment Agreement, dated July 10, 2006. 
 Our signatures below confirm that we have agreed to modify the Employment Agreement in Sections 1 and 4 only as described below as follows: 
 1.
EMPLOYMENT; DUTIES. 
 The provision, as originally written has been deleted in its entirety and is amended to read as follows: 

The Company shall employ Executive as Vice President of Global logistics and Business Development, and Executive accepts such employment under the terms and
conditions set forth in this Agreement. Executive’s duties shall be consistent with those of such a position as defined from time to time by the Company’s board of directors (the “Board”) and the Chief Executive Officer.

  

					
	APPROVED AND AGREED:	 		 	
			
	DATE: __________________	 		 	John LaCorte
		 		 	  
		 		 	
		 		 	
	DATE: __________________	 		 	Sun Energy Solar, Inc.
			
		 		 	  
		 		 	Carl L. Smith
		 		 	 Chairman and Chief Executive
     Officer
TS-ASLT40/50 

### Attachment #3 Pt. 1, Sec. B CAS Inventory Expert Servic e Reports and Chemical Struct ures of the New Chemical Substances The following page gives the CAS Inventory Expert Service (IES) Reports on the new chemical substances. The chemical structures of the compounds are also provided.4 . 1 '4 . 3 '4 . 5 '5 . 1 '5 . 3 '5 . 5 '
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                   GTECH HOLDINGS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                  (Unaudited)
                                                                               Three Months Ended
                                                                       -----------------------------------
                                                                         May 24,                 May 25,
                                                                          2003                    2002
                                                                       ---------                ----------
                                                                      (Dollars in thousands, except ratios)
<S>                                                                    <C>                      <C>
Earnings:
   Income before income taxes                                           $ 65,120                $ 46,841
   Add:
      Interest on indebtedness                                             2,306                   2,925
      Equity income, net of distributions                                   (959)                    215
      Minority losses                                                        575                     329
      Portion of rents representative of the interest factor               1,611                   1,611
      Amortization of capitalized interest                                   211                     312
                                                                        --------                --------
         Adjusted earnings                                              $ 68,864                $ 52,233
                                                                        ========                ========
Fixed charges:
      Interest on indebtedness                                             2,306                   2,925
      Portion of rents representative of the interest factor               1,611                   1,611
      Capitalized interest                                                   407                       -
                                                                        --------                --------
         Total fixed charges                                            $  4,324                $  4,536
                                                                        ========                ========


           Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                              15.93                   11.52
                                                                        ========                ========
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 155 (Thursday, August 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40831-40832]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19387]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection


Accreditation and Approval of Inspectorate America Corporation, 
as a Commercial Gauger and Laboratory

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of accreditation and approval of Inspectorate America 
Corporation, as a commercial gauger and laboratory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 
CFR 151.13, Inspectorate America Corporation, 2947 Duttons Mill Road, 
Suite A-1, Aston, PA 19014, has been approved to gauge and accredited 
to test petroleum and petroleum products, organic chemicals and 
vegetable oils for customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions 
of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this 
entity to conduct laboratory analyses and gauger services should 
request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is 
accredited or approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to 
conduct the specific test or gauger service requested. Alternatively, 
inquires regarding the specific test or gauger service this entity is 
accredited or approved to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs 
and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also 
be sent to

[[Page 40832]]

<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6c0f0e1c42000d0e041d2c08041f420b031a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6c0f0e1c42000d0e041d2c08041f420b031a">[email protected]</span></a>. Please reference the Web site listed below for a 
complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories. 
http://cbp.gov/xp/cgov/import/operations_support/labs_scientific_svcs/commercial_gaugers/.

DATES: The accreditation and approval of Inspectorate America 
Corporation, as commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on 
June 11, 2009. The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for 
June 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony Malana, Laboratories and 
Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-
1060.

    Dated: August 4, 2009.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
[FR Doc. E9-19387 Filed 8-12-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 43

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States allowing

the President to veto any item of appropriation or any provision in

any Act or joint resolution containing an item of appropriation.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. STUMP (for himself and Mr. SOLOMON) introduced the following joint

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States allowing the President to veto any item of appropriation or any provision in any Act or joint resolution

containing an item of appropriation.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when
2

•HJ 43 IH

1 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

2 States:

3 ‘‘ARTICLE—

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. The President may disapprove, in any

5 Act or joint resolution containing an item of appropria6 tion, any item of appropriation or any provision. If an Act

7 or joint resolution is approved by the President, any item

8 of appropriation or provision contained in the Act or joint

9 resolution that is not disapproved shall become law. The

10 President shall return, with his objections, any dis11 approved item of appropriation or provision to the House

12 in which the Act or joint resolution containing such item

13 or provision originated, and may group such disapproved

14 items or provisions for reconsideration by the Congress.

15 The Congress may reconsider any item of appropriation

16 or provision disapproved under this article in the manner

17 prescribed under section 7 of article I for Acts disapproved

18 by the President. The Congress may consider such dis19 approved items or provisions separately or as grouped by

20 the President upon return of the disapproved items, but

21 may not consider such disapproved items or provisions in

22 any other grouping.
3

•HJ 43 IH

1 ‘‘SECTION 2. This article shall take effect at noon on

2 the third day of January of the first odd-numbered year

3 beginning after the date of the ratification of this article.’’.

Æ
IA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 47

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States allowing

an item veto in appropriations bills and an item veto of contract authority

or taxation changes in any other bill.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. ZIMMER introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States allowing an item veto in appropriations bills and

an item veto of contract authority or taxation changes

in any other bill.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several
2

•HJ 47 IH

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission

2 for ratification:

3 ‘‘ARTICLE—

4 ‘‘The President shall have the power to disapprove

5 in whole or in part any appropriation, any authority for

6 the United States to enter into a contract, or any change

7 in the rate or incidence of taxation on any special class

8 of taxpayers and approve any other provision in the same

9 bill. In such case he shall, in signing the bill, designate

10 the appropriations, contract authority, or tax provisions

11 disapproved, and shall return a copy of such disapproved

12 appropriations, contract authority, or tax provisions, with

13 his objections, to the House in which the bill shall have

14 originated; and the same proceedings shall then be had

15 as in the case of other bills disapproved by the President.’’.

Æ