alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2019223EN.01000701.xml

| 27.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 223/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 223/7

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2019/1375

of 26 August 2019

amending for the 305th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures against certain persons and entities associated with the ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida organisations

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 of 27 May 2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida organisations (1), and in particular Article 7(1)(a) and Article 7a(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 lists the persons, groups and entities covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources under that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 lists the persons, groups and entities covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources under that Regulation.

| (2) | On 20 August 2019, the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council decided to amend one entry in the list of persons, groups and entities to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 20 August 2019, the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council decided to amend one entry in the list of persons, groups and entities to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply.

| (3) | Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 August 2019.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Head of the Service for Foreign Policy Instruments

---

(1)  
  OJ L 139, 29.5.2002, p. 9.

1

---

ANNEX

Annex I to Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 is amended as follows:

The identifying data for the following entry under the heading ‘Natural persons’ are amended as follows:

‘BAH AG MOUSSA (Good quality alias: a) Ag Mossa b) Ammi Salim). Nationality: Malian. Date of designation referred to in Article 7d(2)(i): 14.8.2019.’ is replaced by the following:

‘BAH AG MOUSSA (Good quality alias: a) Ag Mossa b) Ammi Salim). Date of birth: a) 1.1.1958, b) 31.12.1952, c) 28.10.1956. Nationality: Malian. Date of designation referred to in Article 7d(2)(i): 14.8.2019.’

---
NO. 06- 14 -00109- CR

STATE OF TEXAS § IN THE

§

VS. § 6th COURT

§

MARLO DONTA PERSONS § OF APPEALS

MOTION TO WITHDRAW AFTER APPEAL

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT:

Now comes Elisha Hollis, Movant and attorney of record for Defendant,

Marlo Donta Persons, brings this Motion to Withdraw After Appeal as counsel and

in support thereof shows:

1. Movant was appointed by the Court to represent Defendant in the

appeal of this cause.

2. Defendant, Marlo Donta Persons, was convicted Possession o f

cocaine in an amount of 400 grams or more on June 05, 2014.

3. The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas affirmed the

judgment of the trial court on June 02, 2015.

4. Tara Long, a licensed attorney in Texas is seeking to substitute in to

represent the Defendant. Defendant request the Court allow Ms. Long to substitute

in and represent the Defendant in his Petition for Discretionary Review in this

case. Ms. Long's bar number is 24032680. Her contact information is as follows:

2656 South Loop W, Ste. 103 ACCEPTED

06-14-00109-CR

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

6/17/2015 4:52:47 PM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERKHouston, TX 75054

Phone: 713

- 349

- 8896

Fax: 713

- 349

- 8863

5. Movant has advised Defendant of his right to file a Petition for

Discretionary Revie w.

6. A copy of this motion will be mailed to the Defenda nt at his last known

address:

Marlo Persons

ID # 1939454

Eastham Unit

2665 Prison Rd. # 1

Lovelady, TX 75851

PRAYER

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Movant prays that the

Court allow Elisha Hollis to withdraw as counsel for Marlo Donta Persons and

from any further representation of Marlo Donta Persons in this cause. Defendant

and Movant further pray the Court Attorney Tara Long to represent Defendant in

the petition for discretionary review of this case.

Respectfully submitted,

The Law Office of Elisha Hollis

2608 Stonewall Street

Greenville, Texas 75401

Tel: (903) 450

- 2473

Fax: (903) 200

- 1290ElishaHollis@gmail.com

By: /s/ Elisha Hollis

Elisha Hollis

State Bar No. 24083189

Attorney for Marlo Persons

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on June 17, 2015, a true and correct copy of the above

and foregoing document was served on the District Attorney's Office, Hunt

County, 2507 Lee Street, Greenville, TX, by hand delivery.

By: /s/ Elisha Hollis

Elisha Hollis

State Bar No. 24083189
Subject:

From:

# ~J 

# Memorandum U.s.Departmentof**Z'::~** 

### NCV 30 P 1+: 

## 20 Transportation Officeof the Secretary ofTransportation Granting Request for Extension for Submission ofProposals for Essential**~ir ~eOeVcMuscle**  Shoals, Alabama

# ~tany, Chirl EAS & Domestic Analysis Division, X-53 Date: November 30,2010

Reply to Attn.

of:

To: Dockets Operations, M-30

By Order 2010-10-13, October 19, 2010, we requested proposals from carriers interested in providing EAS at Muscle Shoals, Alabama, no later than November 22. On November 22, Gulfstream International Airlines requested an extension to submit subsidyproposals and we granted the request, through December 3. Byemail on November 30, the Airport Manager at Northwest Alabama Regional Airport requested an additional 14-dayextension in order to attract more interest from potential carriers that may be interested in providing EAS at Muscle Shoals.
We hereby grant the community's request for an extension for all potential applicants. Proposals are now due no later than 

### December 17,2010.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1031 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1031

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

                                 An Act

 
                 For the relief of Oscar Salas-Velazquez.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF GROUNDS FOR DISAPPROVAL OF REQUESTS FOR 
              CLASSIFICATION AND ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 204(c) of the Immigration 
and Nationality Act, the Attorney General may not disapprove a petition 
for classification of Oscar Salas-Velazquez under section 
201(b)(2)(A)(i) of such Act, or an application for adjustment of the 
status of Oscar Salas-Velazquez under section 245 of such Act, on any 
ground relating to a determination that the marriage of Oscar Salas-
Velazquez and Jennifer Christine Brady was entered into for the purpose 
of evading the immigration laws.
    (b) Waiver of Inadmissibility.--Notwithstanding subparagraphs (A), 
(B), and (C) of section 212(a)(6) of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act, Oscar Salas-Velazquez may not be considered to be within a class 
of excludable aliens at any time on or after the date of the enactment 
of this Act on any ground relating to--
        (1) a determination that the marriage of Oscar Salas-Velazquez 
    and Jennifer Christine Brady was entered into for the purpose of 
    evading the immigration laws; or
        (2) the deportation of Oscar Salas-Velazquez on February 9, 
    1995.
    (c) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Oscar Salas-
Velazquez shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any 
right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Oscar Salas-Velazquez, the 
Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, 
for the current or next following fiscal year, the worldwide level of 
family-sponsored immigrants under section 201(c)(1)(A) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-10029

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUAN MANUEL PENA

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:06-CR-59-3

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, STEWART and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Juan Manuel Pena appeals the 33-month sentence he received following

his conviction for conspiracy to utter and possess counterfeit obligations of an

organization and for possession of counterfeit securities, in violation of

18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 513(a). He argues, for the first time on appeal, that the

district court erred in assessing one criminal history point for his

November 2004 criminal trespass conviction as well as one point for his

November 2005 conviction for driving with a suspended license. To the extent

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

January 23, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-10029

2

that Pena argues that trial counsel was ineffective in failing to raise the

objection at sentencing, the argument will not be reviewed on direct appeal. See

United States v. Miller, 406 F.3d 323, 335-36 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 929

(2005); see also Massaro v. United States, 538 U.S. 500, 503-04 (2003).

We review Pena’s argument for plain error, which requires him to show

that“(1)there was an error; (2) the error was clear and obvious; and (3)the error

affected the defendant’s substantial rights.” United States v. Villegas,

404 F.3d 355, 358 (5th Cir. 2005). The court exercises its discretion to correct

such error only if it“seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation

of judicial proceedings.” Id. at 358-59.

As the Government concedes, the inclusion in Pena’s criminal history

computation of his prior misdemeanor convictions for criminal trespass and

driving with a suspended license, for which he received nonprobated sentences

of less than 30 days each, was clear or obvious error under U.S.S.G.

§ 4A1.2(c)(1). Nevertheless, the error did not affect Pena’s substantial rights

because the same sentence could be imposed on remand under the correctly

calculated guidelines range. See United States v. Wheeler, 322 F.3d 823, 828

(5th Cir. 2003); see also United States v. Alford, 142 F.3d 825, 830

(5th Cir. 1998).

Pena’s argument that his sentence must be vacated as “procedurally

unreasonable” either ignores or is an attempt to circumvent plain-error review,

which review survives Booker and is distinct from reasonableness review. See

Booker v. United States, 543 U.S. 220, 268 (2005); United States v. Mares,

402 F.3d 511, 520 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 828 (2005). Because Pena has

not met his burden of showing reversible plain error, the district court’s

judgment is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                    
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997  
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996  
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996  
<CASH>                                          24,870  
<SECURITIES>                                         0  
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,412  
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0  
<INVENTORY>                                     24,461  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                78,521  
<PP&E>                                          19,404  
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 126,477  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,157  
<BONDS>                                        100,000  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0  
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                        20,001  
<OTHER-SE>                                    (21,599)  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   126,477  
<SALES>                                         78,850  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                78,850  
<CGS>                                           45,354  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,354  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,410  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,287  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,607  
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,136  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,471  
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0  
<CHANGES>                                            0  
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,471  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0  
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

Mary Lynn D. Lenz, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Deborah A.
McLaughlin Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Slade's
Ferry Bancorp (the "Company"), each hereby certifies, pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the
best of her knowledge:

      1)    this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
            quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 fully complies with
            the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
            Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d); and

      2)    the information contained in this Form 10-Q fairly represents in
            all material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company.



November 12,  2003                     /s/ Mary Lynn D. Lenz
-------------------------              ----------------------------------------
(Date)                                 (Signature)            Mary Lynn D. Lenz
                                              President/Chief Executive Officer


November 12, 2003                      /s/ Deborah A. McLaughlin
-------------------------              ----------------------------------------
(Date)                                 (Signature)        Deborah A. McLaughlin
                                                       Chief Operating Officer/
                                                        Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>  32
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION OF SENIOR OFFICER IN CHARGE OF THE SERVICING FUNCTION OF THE SERVICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Kim Taylor, certify that:





1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Huntington Auto Trust 2016-1 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");





2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on the information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.








By:  /s/ Kim Taylor


Name:  Kim Taylor


Title:    Senior Vice President, The Huntington National Bank, as Servicer





Date: March 12, 2020
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 13, 2023. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, November 13, 2023 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A24I0063. NEWBERRY-WILLIAMS FARMS, INC. v. ELIZABETH TOMLIN.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 20CV00300
Exhibit No. 32.1
Form 10-QSB
Universal Express, Inc.
File No. 0-18094


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Express, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Richard Altomare, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: November 13, 2006             By: /s/ Richard Altomare
                                         ---------------------------
                                         Richard Altomare
                                         Chief Executive Officer and
                                         Chief Accounting Officer


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
#### Dorothy Greenberg et al., Appellants, v Sean Kruse et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

[804 NYS2d 98]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Shapiro, J.), dated September 17, 2004, which granted the motion of the defendants J.C. Hambone & Company, Inc., doing business as Flanigan’s Bar, and John Cunningham to change venue from Bronx County to Putnam County, and denied their cross motion to retain venue in Bronx County or, in the alternative, to change venue to New York County.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

CPLR 503 (a) provides, in pertinent part, “except where otherwise prescribed by law, the place of trial shall be in the county in which one of the parties resided when [the action] was commenced.” Since it is undisputed that none of the parties resided in Bronx County at the time of commencement of this action, the plaintiffs’ choice of venue in the county where the accident occurred was improper *(see Fisher v Finnegan-Curtis,*8 AD3d 527, 528 [2004]; *Figueroa v Mari,*5 AD3d 629 [2004]; *Mei Ying Wu v Waldbaum, Inc.,*284 AD2d 434, 435 [2001]; *Dalton v Barrett,*275 AD2d 297, 298 [2000]; *DelValle v Baldor Elec. Co.,*265 AD2d 445, 445-446 [1999]). Moreover, by improperly commencing this action in Bronx County, the plaintiffs forfeited the right to select venue *(see Fisher v Finnegan-Curtis, supra*at 528; *Figueroa v Mari, supra; Mei Ying Wu v Waldbaum, Inc., supra*at 435; *Dalton v Barrett, supra*at 298; *DelValle v Baldor Elec. Co., supra).*

The defendants J.C. Hambone & Company, Inc., doing business as Flanigan’s Bar, and John Cunningham (hereinafter collectively the defendants) properly served a demand to change venue before they answered *(see*CPLR 511 [a]) and timely moved to change venue to Putnam County, where most of the defendants resided *(see*CPLR 503 [a]; 510, 511).

In cross moving to retain venue in Bronx County or, alternatively, to transfer venue to New York County based on the con*348venience of material nonparty witnesses, the plaintiffs failed, to sufficiently demonstrate, inter alia, the manner in which the prospective witnesses would be inconvenienced if venue was not retained in Bronx County or, alternatively, transferred to New York County *(see*CPLR 510 [3]; *O’Brien v Vassar Bros. Hosp.,*207 AD2d 169, 172 [1995]). Under the circumstances, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the defendants’ motion and denying the plaintiffs’ cross motion *(cf. Jarrett v Berner,*8 AD3d 236, 237 [2004]; *Small v Chrysler Corp.,*288 AD2d 208 [2001]; *Blumberg v Salem Truck Leasing,*276 AD2d 577 [2000]; *Mallory v Long Is. R.R.,*245 AD2d 493 [1997]; *Feldman v North Shore Univ. Hosp.,*157 AD2d 831, 832 [1990]). Cozier, J.P., Santucci, Luciano, Fisher and Covello, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

EDWARD GOLPHIN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 203 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 15th day of September, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED

.