### Syngenta 5307

- EPA

- 7 242 of 590 

## Section G. Proposed Experimental Program

G.1 .a

. Participants in the Experimental Program

Table 1

. List of Participants who will supervise experimental work conducted under this

EUP. All Participants are research scientists employed by Syngen ta Seeds , Inc

. or its

affiliate companies.



## Name /

Affiliation Address Position

Kevin Barber /

Syngenta Seeds 12101 Thorps Road

Clinton, IL 61727 Agronomist

Bruce Battles /

Syngenta Seeds 2369 330th St.

P.O. Box 500

Ames, IA 50014 Agromony manager

Eric Boudreau /

Syngenta

Biotechnology P.O. Box 12257

3054 E. Cornwallis Rd

RTP, NC 27709

- 2257 Project Leader

Jim Elliot /

Syngenta Crop

Protection PO Box 959

Minneapolis, MN

55440

- 0959 Agronomist

Wayne Fithian /

Syngenta Se eds 100 JC Robinson Blvd

Waterloo, NE 68069 Product Manager

Eric Ford /

Syngenta Seeds 7500 Olson Memorial Highway

Golden Valley, MN 55427 Product Manager

Ijaz Hussain /

Syngenta Seeds 2369 330th Street

Slater, IA 50244 Plant breeder

Wendelyn Jones /

Syngenta

Biotechnology P.O. Box 12257

3054 E. Cornwallis Rd

RTP, NC 27709

- 2257 Regulatory Affairs

Manager

Von Kaster /

Syngenta Seeds 2369 330th Street

Slater, IA 50244 Entomologist

Ryan Kurtz /

Syngenta

Biotechnology P.O. Box 12257

3054 E. Cornw allis Rd

RTP, NC 27709

- 2257 IRM manager

Mitch Meehan /

Syngenta Seeds 2369 330th Street

Slater, IA 50244 Entomologist

Moez Meghji /

Syngenta Seeds 14658 E. 925 North Rd,

Bloomington, IL 61704 Plant breeder

Al Mousel /

Syngenta Seeds 317 330th Street

Stanton, MN 55018 Plant breeder

### Syngenta 5307

- EPA

- 7 243 of 590 

## Name /

Affiliation Address Position

Steve Mroczkiewicz /

Syngenta Crop

Protection 7755 Office Plaza Drive North

Suite 105

West Des Moines, IA 50266 Entomologist

Craig Nichols /

Syng enta Crop

Protection 7755 Office Plaza Drive North

Suite 105

West Des Moines, IA 50266 R&D Scientist

Greg Parker /

Syngenta Seeds 2369 330th Street

Slater, IA 50244 Plant breeder

Lisa Phelps /

Syngenta

Biotechnoloy P.O. Box 12257

3054 E. Cornwallis Rd

RTP, NC 27709

- 2257 Regulatory Field

Program

Coordinator

Doug Plaisted /

Syngenta Seeds 6338 Highway 20

- 26

Nampa, ID 83687 Plant breeder

Brian Potter /

Syngenta

Biotechnology P.O. Box 12257

3054 E. Cornwallis Rd

RTP, NC 27709

- 2257 Regulatory Sample

Coordinator

Chris Reitan /

Syngenta Seeds 340 Southside Drive

Henderson, KY 42420 Plant breeder

Jon Sagers /

Syngenta Seeds 317 330th Street Stanton, MN

55018 Entomologist

Richard Smelser /

Syngenta Seeds 1 00 JC Robinson Blvd

Waterloo, NE 68069 Agronomist

Henry

- York Steiner /

Syngenta

Biotechnology P.O. Box 12257

3054 E. Cornwallis Rd

RTP, NC 27709

- 2257 Regulatory Affair

Manager

Jon Stocker /

Syngenta Seeds 7050 Kaumualii Highway

Box 823

Kekaha, Kauai, H I 96752 HI Event Selection

Lead

Luis Vendrell/

Syngenta Seeds Bo. Coqui, Road #3

Salinas, Puerto Rico PR Conv. Lead

Leslie Westgate/

Syngenta Seeds 7050 Kaumualii Highway

Box 823

Kekaha, Kauai, HI 96752 Head, Hawaii

Conv ersion

James White /

Syngenta Seeds 14658 E. 925 North Rd,

Bloomington, IL 61704 Entomologist

Fasica Woldeyes /

Syngenta

Biotechnology P.O. Box 12257

3054 E. Cornwallis Rd

RTP, NC 27709

- 2257 Regulatory Test

Substance

Coordinator

### Syngenta 5307

- EPA

- 7 244 of 590 

## Name /

Affiliation Address Position

Tyler Y onemori /

Syngenta Seeds 94

- 889 Kunia Road

Kunia, HI 96759 Oahu Conv ersion

Lead

Hua

- Ping Zhou /

Syngenta Seeds 2369

- 330th St.

Slater, IA 50244 Scientist

### Syngenta 5307

- EPA

- 7 245 of 590 

## G.1.b

. Cooperators in the Experimental Program

The names, addresses and contact information of the Cooperators involved in this

experimental program will be provided to the Agency prior to planting.

Table 2. List of Cooperators (r eserved )

### Syngenta 5307

- EPA

- 7 246 of 590 

## G.1.c. Counties where experimental trials will likely be conducted

Experimental trials may be condu cted in the following counties.

AR CA CO FL

Clay Fresno Adams Collier

Crittenden King Arapahoe Glade

Independence Madera Baca Hendry

Lonoke San Jaoquin Bent Indian River

Prairie Santa Clara Cheyenne Manatee

Jackson Tulare Crowley Miami Dade

Lee Yolo Douglas Okeechobee

Washington El Paso Palm Beach

Elbert

Kiowa

Kit Carson

Larimer

Las Animas

Lincoln

Logan

Morgan

Otero

Phillips

Prowers

Pueblo

Sedgwick

Washington

Weld

Yuma

### Syngenta 5307

- EPA

- 7 247 of 590 

## GA HI IA

Burke Honolulu Adair Davis

Decatur Kauai Adams Decatur

Grady Maui Allamakee Delaware

Mitchell Appanoose Des Moines

Pike Audubon Dickinson

Sumter Benton Dubuque

Tift Black Hawk Emmet

Turner Boone Fayette

Union Bremer Fl oyd

Buchanan Franklin

Buena Vista Fremont

Butler Greene

Calhoun Grundy

Carroll Guthrie

Cass Hamilton

Cedar Hancock

Cerro Gordo Hardin

Cherokee Harrison

Chickasaw Henry

Clarke Howard

Clay Humbolt

Clayton Ida

Clinton Iowa

Crawford Jackson

Dallas Jasper

### Syngenta 5307

- EPA

- 7 248 of 590 

## IA (continued) ID IL

Jefferson Polk Ada Adams

Johnson Pottawattamie Canyon Alexander

Jones Poweshiek Bond

Keokuk Ringgold Boone

Kossuth Sac Brown

Lee Scott Bureau

Linn Shelby Calhoun

Louisa Sio ux Carroll

Lucas Story Cass

Lyon Tama Champaign

Madison Taylor Christian

Mahaska Union Clark

Marion Van Buren Clay

Marshall Wapello Clinton

Mills Warren Coles

Mitchell Washington Crawford

Monona Wayne Cumberland

Monroe Webster Dekalb

Montgomery Winnebago Dewitt

Muscatine Winneshiek Douglas

O’Brien Woodbury Edgar

Osceola Worth Edwards

Page Wright Effingham

Palo Alto Fayette

Plymouth Ford

Pocahontas Franklin

### Syngenta 5307

- EPA

- 7 249 of 590 

## IL (continued) IN

Fulton Macoupin Saline Adams

Gallatin Madison Sangamon Allen

Greene Marion Schuyler Bartholomew

Grundy Marshall Scott Benton

Hamilton Mason Shelby Blackford

Hancock Massac St. Clair Boone

Hardin McDonough Stark Brown

Henderson McHenry Stephenson Carroll

Henry McLean Tazewell Cass

Iroquois Menard Union Clark

Jackson Mercer Vermilion Clay

Jasper Monroe Wabash Clinton

Jefferson Montgomery Warren Crawford

Jersey Morgan Washington Daviess

Jo Daviess Moultrie Wayne De Kalb

Johnson Ogle White Dearborn

Kane Peoria Whiteside De catur

Kankakee Perry Will Delaware

Kendall Piatt Williamson Dubois

Knox Pike Winnebago Elkhart

La Salle Pope Woodford Fayette

Lawrence Pulaski Floyd

Lee Putnam Fountain

Livingston Randolph Franklin

Logan Richland Fulton

Macon Rock Island Gibs on

### Syngenta 5307

- EPA

- 7 250 of 590 

## IN (continued) KS

Grant Monroe Tipton Allen

Greene Montgomery Union Anderson

Hamilton Morgan Vanderburgh Atchison

Hancock Newton Vermillion Barber

Harrison Noble Vigo Barton

Hendricks Ohio Wabash Bourbon

Henry Orange Brown

Howard Owen Bu tler

Huntington Parke Chase

Jackson Perry Chautauqua

Jasper Pike Cherokee

Jay Posey Cheyenne

Jefferson Pulaski Clark

Jennings Putnam Clay

Johnson Randolph Cloud

Knox Ripley Coffey

Kosciusko Rush Comanche

Lafayette Scott Cowley

La Porte Shelby Crawford

Lagrange Spencer Decatur

Lawrence St. Joseph Dickinson

Madison Starke Doniphan

Marion Steuben Douglas

Marshall Sullivan Edwards

Martin Switzerland Elk

Miami Tippecanoe Ellis

### Syngenta 5307

- EPA

- 7 251 of 590 

## KS (continued) KY

Ellsworth Linn Rice Balla rd

Finney Logan Riley Caldwell

Ford Lyon Rooks Calloway

Franklin Marion Rush Carlisle

Geary Marshall Russell Christian

Gove McPherson Saline Crittenden

Graham Meade Scott Daviess

Grant Miami Sedgwick Fayette

Gray Mitchell Seward Fulton

Greeley Mon tgomery Shawnee Graves

Greenwood Morris Sheridan Henderson

Hamilton Morton Sherman Hickman

Harper Nemaha Smith Hopkins

Harvey Neosho Stafford Livingston

Haskell Ness Stanton Lyon

Hodgeman Norton Stevens Marshall

Jackson Osage Sumner McCracken

Jewel l Osborne Thomas McLean

Johnson Ottawa Trego Muhlenberg

Lane Rawlins Wilson Ohio

Kearny Pawnee Wabaunsee Todd

Kingman Phillips Wallace Trigg

Kiowa Pottawatomie Washington Union

Leavenworth Reno Woodson Warren

Labette Pratt Wichita Webster

Lincoln R epublic Wyandotte

### Syngenta 5307

- EPA

- 7 252 of 590 

## LA MD MI MN

Catahoula Caroline Calhoun Anoka

Concordia Cecil Gratiot Becker

Franklin Howard Ingham Benton

Lincoln Kent Isabella Big Stone

Ouachita Prince George’s Kent Blue Earth

Rapides Queen Anne Lenawee Brown

St. Landry Wa shington Muskegon Carlton

Wicomico Sanilac Chippewa

Tuscola Chisago

Clay

Cottonwood

Dakota

Dodge

Douglas

Faribault

Fillmore

Freeborn

Goodhue

Grant

Hennepin

Houston

Isanti

Jackson

Kanabec

Kandiyohi

Lac Qui Parle

### Syngenta 5307

- EPA

- 7 253 of 590 

## MN (continued) MO

Le Sueur Stearns Adair Howard

Lincoln Steele Andrew Jackson

Lyon Stevens Atchison Jefferson

Martin Swift Audrain Johnson

McLeod Todd Barton Knox

Meeker Traverse Boone Lafayette

Mille Lacs Wabas ha Buchanan Lewis

Morrison Wadena Butler Lincoln

Mower Waseca Caldwell Linn

Murray Washington Callaway Livingston

Nicolett Watonwan Carroll Macon

Nobles Wilkin Cass Maries

Norman Winona Chariton Marion

Olmsted Wright Clark Miller

Otter Tail Yellow Medicine Clay Monjteau

Pine Clinton Monroe

Pipestone Cole Montgomery

Pope Cooper Morgan

Ramsey Daviess Nodaway

Redwood Dekalb Osage

Renville Franklin Pettis

Rice Gasconade Pike

Rock Gentry Platte

Scott Grundy Putnam

Sherburne Harrison R alls

Sibley Holt Randolph

### Syngenta 5307

- EPA

- 7 254 of 590 

## MO MS NC NE

Saline Bolivar Camden Adams

Scotland Humphrey Durham Antelope

St. Charles Issaquena Guilford Boone

Shelby Sharkey Martin Buffalo

Schuyler Sunflower Orange Burt

Ray Washington Pasquotank Butler

St. Louis Perquimens Cass

Stoddard Washington Cedar

Sullivan Wake Chase

Warren Wayne Clay

Worth Colfax

Mississippi Cuming

Vernon Custer

Dakota

Dawson

Dixon

Dodge

Douglas

Dundy

Fillmore

Franklin

Frontier

Furnas

Gage

Garfield

Gosper

### Syngenta 5307

- EPA

- 7 255 of 590 

## NE (continued) NY OH

Greeley Polk Columbia Adams

Hall Red Willow Cortland Allen

Hamilton Richardson Tomkins Ashland

Harlan Saline Athens

Hayes Sarpy Auglazie

Hitchcock Saunders Brown

Holt Scottsbluff Butler

Howard Seward Campaign

Jefferson Sherman Clark

Johnson Stanton Clermont

Kearney Thayer Clinton

Keith Thurston Coshocton

Knox Valley Crawford

Lancaster Washington Darke

Lincoln Wayne Defiance

Madison Webster Delaware

Merrick Wheeler Erie

Morrill York Fairfield

Nance Fayette

Nemaha Franklin

Nuckolls Fulton

Otoe Gallia

Pawnee Greene

Perkins Hamilton

Phelps Hancock

Pierce Hardin

Platte Henry

### Syngenta 5307

- EPA

- 7 256 of 590 

## OH (continued) OK PR

Highland Richland Caddo Guayama

Hocking Ros s Juana Diaz

Holmes Sandusky Sabana Grande

Huron Scioto Salinas

Jackson Seneca Santa Isabel

Knox Shelby

Lawrence Stark

Licking Union

Logan VanWert

Lucas Vinton

Madison Warren

Marion Wayne

Marrow Williams

Medina Wood

Mei gs Wyandot

Mercer

Miami

Montgomery

Morgan

Muskingum

Ottawa

Paulding

Perry

Pickaway

Pike

Preble

Putnam

### Syngenta 5307

- EPA

- 7 257 of 590 

## SC SD TX

Barnwell Aurora Lake Bee

Beadle Lincoln Brazos

Bon Homme Marshall Castro

Brookin gs McCook Dallam

Brown McPherson Deaf Smith

Brule Miner Ellis

Buffalo Minnehaha Falls

Charles Mix Moody Fort Bend

Clark Roberts Hale

Clay Spink Harris

Codington Turner Hidalgo

Davison Union Hill

Day Yankton Lamb

Deuel Lubbock

Douglas Medina

Edmunds Moore

Faulk Nueces

Grant Ochiltree

Gregory Potter

Hamlin Randall

Hand Swisher

Hanson Uvalde

Hutchinson Victoria

Hyde Wharton

Jerauld Williamson

Kingsbury

### Syngenta 5307

- EPA

- 7 258 of 590 

## WA WI

Franklin Adams Lafayette Waukesha

Gra nt Barron Lincoln Waupaca

Brown Manitowoc Waushara

Buffalo Marathon Winnebago

Calumet Marquette Wood

Chippewa Milwaukee

Clark Monroe

Columbia Outagame

Crawford Ozaukee

Dane Pepin

Dodge Pierce

Door Polk

Dunn Portage

Dutagamie Racine

Eau Claire Richland

Fon Du Lac Rock

Grant Rusk

Green Sauk

Green Lake Shawano

Iowa Sheboygan

Jackson St. Croix

Jefferson Taylor

Juneau Trempealeau

Kenosha Vernon

Kewaunee Walworth

La Crosse Washington

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 259 of 590 

## G .2

. Acreage and Seed Q uantities by State or Territory for E UP Program

The acres and seed quantities defined in the tables below will be needed to achieve the

objectives of the experimental program (see Section G.4).

The PIP materials (containing one or more PIP trait s ) included in th e experimental

program are as follows (inclusive) . An asterisk (*) following the material indicates a

registered PIP or PIP combination

.

**•** Bt11 *

**•** DAS

- 59122

- 7 *

**•** MIR162 *

**•** MIR60 4 *

**•** TC1507 *

**•** 5307

**•** Bt11 x MIR162 *

**•** Bt11 x MIR604 *

**•** Bt11 x TC1507

**•** Bt11 x 5307

**•** DAS

- 59122

- 7 x MIR604

**•** TC1507 x DAS

- 59122

- 7 *

**•** DAS

- 59122

- 7 x 5307

**•** MIR162 x TC1507

**•** MIR604 x 5307

**•** MIR604x TC1507

**•** Bt11 x DAS

- 59122

- 7 x TC1507

**•** Bt11 x MIR162 x MIR604 *

**•** Bt11 x MIR162 x TC1507

**•** B t11 x MIR604 x TC1507

**•** Bt11 x MIR604 x 5307

**•** DAS59122 x MIR604 x TC1507

**•** MIR604 x TC1507 x 5307

**•** MIR162 x TC1507x 5307

**•** Bt11 x DAS

- 59122

- 7 x MIR162 x TC1507

**•** Bt11 x DAS

- 59122

- 7 x MIR604 x TC1507

**•** Bt11 x MIR162 x MIR604 x TC1507

**•** Bt11 x MIR162 x MIR604 x 5307

**•** Bt1 1 x MIR604 x TC1507 x 5307

**•** MIR162 x MIR604 x TC1507 x 5307

**•** Bt11 x DAS

- 59122

- 7 x MIR162 x MIR604 x TC1507

**•** Bt11 x MIR162 x MIR604 x TC1507 x 5307

**•** Bt11 x DAS

- 59122

- 7 x MIR162 x MIR604 x TC1507 x 5307

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 260 of 590 

## Syngenta has endeavored to forecast its acreage needs an d fi eld testing program for the

2010 and 2011 calendar year s . Table 3 provide s a listing of acres by state and PIP trait

needed to accommodate the experimental program. The acreage estimates in Table 3 are

for both PIP and non

- PIP plantings

. The total num ber of acres planted will not exceed

the acres sp ecified in Table 3 for each state . The allocation of acres among PIPs and

protocols represent s best estimates as of this date. Environmental conditions, including

but not limited to weather and pest infesta tion, land availability, and other factors may

necessitate small reallocation s of acres between protocols and traits. Tables 4

- 69 provi de

a listing of acreage planned for planting of the EUP trials organized by protocol type and

state/territory.

EUP acr eage is computed by summing PIP and non

- PIP acreage within trial plots and

blocks (trial blocks are contiguous experimental acres within which test plants are

planted). Acres planted to non

- PIP corn and intended for crosses with a PIP are cou nted

as PIP ac res. Conventional corn or other non

- PIP corn planted within the trial block as a

control (e.g.

, in yield or efficacy trials) or as an insecticide

- treated control is captured

under ‘non

- PIP’ acres. Border acres include perimeter or buffer rows of conventio nal

corn and are calculated on the basis of a four

- row border in which the rows are separated

by 30 inches. Border acres are captured under ‘non

- PIP’ acres.

Many PIP breeding stacks in this experimental program are inbred intermediate stacks.

They are pr oduced in the process of bringing together more than two PIP traits into a

single hybrid. Many of these will not become commercial products. Despite the

multitude of intermediate inbred stacks produced under the program , the number of acres

per intermedi ate is relatively small.

Total quantities of the following protein active ingredient s have been computed for the

program: Cry1Ab, Cry34Ab1, Cry35Ab1, Vip3A20, mCry3A, Cry1F and eCry3.1Ab

. Amounts a re calculated as a sum of the planting seed of all events that produce this

protein per state ( Tables 70 and 71 ). This is based on the amount of active ingredient

calculated per PIP product per state ( Tables 4

- 69 ). The c alculation for each protein

below is based on a maximum expression level of that protein in corn seed on a dry

weight basis for Cry1Ab, Cry3 4Ab1, Cry35Ab1, Vip3A20, mCry3A and Cry1F

. The

value for eCry3.1Ab w as based on the highest plant tissue expression level. Expression

levels for calculation of each protein quantity are as follows:

Protein : Expression level (μg/g):

Cry1Ab 0.16



## Cry34Ab1 117



## Cry35Ab1 1.61



## Vip3A20 4.03



## mCry3A 3.13



## Cry1F 2.55



## eCry3.1Ab 146.7



## Note: Total values in Tables 70 and 71 may differ slightly from the sum of individual

values due to rounding.

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 261 of 590 

## Table 3. Tabulation of proposed planting acreage for the 2010 and 2011 growing seasons.

Bt11 DAS

- 59122

- 7 MIR162 MIR604 TC1507 5307

State 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011

AR 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

CA 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

CO 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 6

FL 4 4 6 6 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

GA 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

HI 23 23 18 18 12 12 17 17 23 23 23 17

IA 26 26 17 17 21 21 15 15 18 18 38 41

ID 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

IL 30 30 22 22 28 28 29 29 30 30 30 31

IN 8 8 6 6 6 6 7 7 6 6 8 7

KS 7 7 4 4 6 6 4 4 6 6 7 6

KY 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

LA 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

MD 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

MI 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

MN 17 17 11 11 17 17 15 15 17 17 17 15

MO 10 10 8 8 6 6 8 8 8 8 10 12

MS 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

NC 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 6

NE 20 20 16 16 11 11 20 20 22 22 28 27

NY 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

OH 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 6

OK 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

PR 21 21 15 15 18 18 15 15 25 25 25 17

SC 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

SD 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 6

TX 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 6

WA 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

WI 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 6

Totals 242 242 199 199 205 205 210 210 235 235 266 265

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 262 of 590 

## Table 3 (continued). Tabulation of proposed planting acreage for the 2010 and 2011 growing seasons.

Bt11 x MIR162 Bt11 x MIR604 Bt11 x TC1507 Bt11 x 53 07 DAS

- 59122

- 7 x

MIR604 DAS

- 59122

- 7 x

TC1507

State 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011

AR 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

CA 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

CO 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

FL 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

GA 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

HI 41 41 18 18 16 16 15 15 12 12 18 18

IA 30 30 18 18 19 19 30 30 16 16 14 14

ID 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

IL 29 29 30 30 29 29 30 30 16 16 15 15

IN 6 6 8 8 6 6 6 6 4 4 4 4

KS 6 6 4 4 6 6 4 4 4 4 4 4

KY 9 9 4 4 9 9 4 4 4 4 4 4

LA 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

MD 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

MI 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

MN 15 15 17 17 15 15 17 17 11 11 7 7

MO 10 10 10 10 10 10 6 6 6 6 4 4

MS 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

NC 6 6 4 4 6 6 4 4 4 4 6 6

NE 30 30 28 28 23 23 19 19 10 10 12 12

NY 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

OH 7 7 4 4 7 7 4 4 4 4 4 4

OK 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

PR 20 20 25 25 15 15 16 16 10 10 13 13

SC 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

SD 6 6 4 4 6 6 4 4 4 4 4 4

TX 6 6 4 4 6 6 4 4 4 4 4 4

WA 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

WI 6 6 4 4 6 6 4 4 4 4 4 4

Totals 283 283 238 238 235 235 223 223 169 169 173 173

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 263 of 590 

## Table 3 (continued). Tabulation of proposed planting acreage for the 2010 and 2011 growing seasons.

DAS

- 59122

- 7 x 5307 MIR162 x TC1507 MIR604 x 5307 MIR604x TC1507 Bt11 x DAS

- 59122

- 7 x

TC1507

State 2010 2011 2010 2011 2 010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011

AR 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

CA 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

CO 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

FL 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

GA 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

HI 10 10 18 18 13 13 18 18 18 18

IA 14 14 20 20 30 30 20 20 20 20

ID 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

IL 16 16 27 27 29 29 27 27 27 27

IN 4 4 8 8 6 6 8 8 8 8

KS 4 4 8 8 6 6 8 8 8 8

KY 4 4 12 12 9 9 12 12 12 12

LA 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

MD 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

MI 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

MN 8 8 21 21 17 17 21 21 21 21

MO 4 4 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

MS 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

NC 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

NE 8 8 30 30 27 27 30 30 30 30

NY 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

OH 4 4 6 6 4 4 6 4 6 6

OK 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

PR 10 10 24 24 14 14 24 24 24 24

SC 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

SD 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 4 4 4

TX 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

WA 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

WI 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

Totals 158 158 256 256 238 238 256 254 256 256

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 264 of 590 

## Table 3 (continued). Tabulation of proposed planting acreage for the 2010 and 2011 growing seasons.

Bt11 x MIR162 x MIR604 Bt11 x MIR162 x

TC1507 Bt11 x MIR604 x

5307 DAS5912 2 x MIR604 x

TC1507 MIR604 x TC1507 x

5307

State 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011

AR 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

CA 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

CO 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

FL 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

GA 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

HI 26 26 13 13 18 18 26 26 62 62

I A 19 19 30 30 30 30 30 30 66 66

ID 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

IL 18 18 29 29 29 29 30 30 47 47

IN 4 4 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

KS 4 4 6 6 4 4 8 8 6 6

KY 5 5 11 11 4 4 14 14 12 12

LA 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

MD 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

MI 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

MN 9 9 17 17 15 15 24 24 24 24

MO 6 6 12 12 10 10 12 12 12 12

MS 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

NC 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 6 6

NE 14 14 27 27 27 27 30 30 47 47

NY 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

OH 4 4 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

OK 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

PR 12 12 15 15 14 14 18 18 33 33

SC 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

SD 4 4 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

TX 4 4 8 8 6 6 6 6 6 6

WA 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

WI 4 4 4 4 4 4 6 6 4 4

Totals 195 195 250 250 239 239 282 282 399 399

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 265 of 590 

## Table 3 (continued). Tabulation of proposed planting acreage for the 2010 and 2011 growing seasons.

MIR16 2 x TC1507x 5307 Bt11 x DAS

- 59122

- 7 x MIR162 x

TC1507 Bt11 x DAS

- 59122

- 7 x MIR604

x TC1507 Bt11 x MIR162 x MIR604 x

TC1507

State 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011

AR 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

CA 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

CO 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

FL 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

GA 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

HI 4 4 4 4 15 15 10 10

IA 4 4 4 4 41 41 16 16

ID 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

IL 4 4 4 4 29 29 18 18

IN 4 4 4 4 8 8 4 4

KS 4 4 4 4 8 8 4 4

KY 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

LA 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

MD 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

MI 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

MN 4 4 4 4 21 21 8 8

MO 4 4 4 4 12 12 4 4

MS 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

NC 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

NE 4 4 4 4 29 29 8 8

NY 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

OH 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

OK 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

PR 4 4 4 4 14 14 6 6

SC 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

SD 4 4 4 4 8 8 4 4

TX 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

WA 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

WI 4 4 4 4 8 8 4 4

Totals 116 116 116 116 265 265 158 158

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 266 of 590 

## Table 3 (continued). Tabulation of proposed planting acreage for the 2010 and 2011 growing seasons.

Bt11 x MIR162 x MIR604 x 5307 Bt11 x MIR604 x TC1507 x 5307 MIR162 x MIR604 x TC1507 x 5307

State 2010 2 011 2010 2011 2010 2011

AR 4 4 4 4 4 4

CA 4 4 4 4 4 4

CO 4 4 4 4 4 4

FL 4 4 4 4 4 4

GA 4 4 4 4 4 4

HI 12 12 14 14 4 4

IA 16 16 22 22 4 4

ID 4 4 4 4 4 4

IL 18 18 34 34 4 4

IN 4 4 6 6 4 4

KS 4 4 6 6 4 4

KY 4 4 7 7 4 4

LA 4 4 4 4 4 4

MD 4 4 4 4 4 4

MI 4 4 4 4 4 4

MN 8 8 19 19 4 4

MO 4 4 10 10 4 4

MS 4 4 4 4 4 4

NC 4 4 4 4 4 4

NE 6 6 15 15 4 4

NY 4 4 4 4 4 4

OH 4 4 4 4 4 4

OK 4 4 4 4 4 4

PR 6 6 13 13 4 4

SC 4 4 4 4 4 4

SD 4 4 6 6 4 4

TX 4 4 4 4 4 4

WA 4 4 4 4 4 4

WI 4 4 6 6 4 4

Tot als 158 158 226 226 116 116

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 267 of 590 

## Table 3 (continued). Tabulation of proposed planting acreage for the 2010 and 2011 growing seasons.

Bt11 x DAS

- 59122

- 7 x MIR162 x MIR604

x TC1507 Bt11 x MIR162 x MIR604 x TC1507 x 5307 Bt11 x DAS

- 59122

- 7 x MIR162 x

MIR604 x T C1507 x 5307

State 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011

AR 4 4 4 4 4 4

CA 4 4 4 4 4 4

CO 4 4 4 4 4 4

FL 4 4 4 4 4 4

GA 4 4 4 4 4 4

HI 13 13 13 13 13 13

IA 39 39 39 39 28 28

ID 4 4 4 4 4 4

IL 29 29 34 34 29 29

IN 6 6 6 6 6 6

KS 4 4 6 6 4 4

KY 6 6 6 6 5 5

LA 4 4 4 4 4 4

MD 4 4 4 4 4 4

MI 4 4 4 4 4 4

MN 16 16 17 17 17 17

MO 10 10 10 10 10 10

MS 4 4 4 4 4 4

NC 4 4 4 4 6 6

NE 29 29 15 15 19 19

NY 4 4 4 4 4 4

OH 4 4 4 4 4 4

OK 4 4 4 4 4 4

PR 13 13 12 12 13 13

SC 4 4 4 4 4 4

SD 6 6 6 6 6 6

TX 5 5 4 4 4 4

WA 4 4 4 4 4 4

WI 4 4 4 4 4 4

Totals 244 244 236 236 224 224

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 268 of 590 

## Table 4. Estimated acreage utilization for Bt11 plantings presented by state and trial

type for 2010. Non

- PIP acres include plantings with conventional lines used as controls

or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 10 7 3 3 13 10

IA 8 6 6 6 14 12

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 10 8 6 6 16 14

IN 2 2 2 2 4 4

KS 2 1 2 2 4 3

KY 1 1 1 1 2 2

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 6 5 3 3 9 8

MO 3 3 2 2 5 5

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 6 6 4 4 10 10

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 10 5 3 3 13 8

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 1 1 1 1 2 2

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2010 Totals 77 63 51 51 128 114

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 269 of 590 

## Table 5. Estimated acreage utilization for Bt11 plantings presented by state and trial

type for 2011. Non

- PIP acres include plantings with conventional lines used as con trols

or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 10 7 3 3 13 10

IA 8 6 6 6 14 12

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 10 8 6 6 16 14

IN 2 2 2 2 4 4

KS 2 1 2 2 4 3

KY 1 1 1 1 2 2

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 6 5 3 3 9 8

MO 3 3 2 2 5 5

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 6 6 4 4 10 10

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 10 5 3 3 13 8

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 1 1 1 1 2 2

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2011 Totals 77 63 51 51 128 114

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 270 of 590 

## Table 6. Estimated acreage utilization for DAS

- 59122

- 7 plantings presented by state

and trial type for 2010. Non

- PIP acres include plantings with conventional li nes used as

controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 2 2 3 3

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 7 5 3 3 10 8

IA 5 4 4 4 9 8

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 10 8 2 2 12 10

IN 2 2 1 1 3 3

KS 1 1 1 1 2 2

KY 1 1 1 1 2 2

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 5 4 1 1 6 5

MO 2 2 2 2 4 4

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 6 6 2 2 8 8

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 5 4 3 3 8 7

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 1 1 1 1 2 2

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2010

Totals 63 56 40 40 103 96

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 271 of 590 

## Table 7. Estimated acreage utilization for DAS

- 59122

- 7 plantings presented by state

and trial type for 2011. Non

- PIP acres include plantings with conventi onal lines used as

controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 2 2 3 3

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 7 5 3 3 10 8

IA 5 4 4 4 9 8

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 10 8 2 2 12 10

IN 2 2 1 1 3 3

KS 1 1 1 1 2 2

KY 1 1 1 1 2 2

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 5 4 1 1 6 5

MO 2 2 2 2 4 4

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 6 6 2 2 8 8

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 5 4 3 3 8 7

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 1 1 1 1 2 2

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2011

Totals 63 56 40 40 103 96

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 272 of 590 

## Table 8. Estimated acreage utilization for MIR162 plantings presented by state and

trial type for 2010. Non

- PIP acres include plantings with conve ntional lines used as

controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 3 3 3 3 6 6

IA 6 5 5 5 11 10

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 1 0 8 5 5 15 13

IN 2 1 2 1 4 2

KS 2 1 2 1 4 2

KY 1 1 1 1 2 2

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 6 5 3 3 9 8

MO 2 2 1 1 3 3

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 3 2 3 3 6 5

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 7 5 3 3 10 8

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 1 1 1 1 2 2

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2010

Totals 61 52 47 45 108 97

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 273 of 590 

## Table 9 . Estimated acreage utilization for MIR162 plantings presented by state and

trial type for 2011 . Non

- PIP acres include plantings wit h conventional lines used as

controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 3 3 3 3 6 6

IA 6 5 5 5 11 10

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 10 8 5 5 15 13

IN 2 1 2 1 4 2

KS 2 1 2 1 4 2

KY 1 1 1 1 2 2

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 6 5 3 3 9 8

MO 2 2 1 1 3 3

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 3 2 3 3 6 5

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 7 5 3 3 10 8

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 1 1 1 1 2 2

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2011

Totals 61 52 47 45 108 97

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 274 of 590 

## Table 10 . Estimated acreage utilization for MIR604 plantings presented by state

and trial type for 2010 . Non

- PIP acres include planti ngs with conventional lines

used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 7 4 3 3 10 7

IA 5 4 3 3 8 7

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 9 8 6 6 15 14

IN 2 2 2 1 4 3

KS 1 1 1 1 2 2

KY 1 1 1 1 2 2

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 5 4 3 3 8 7

MO 2 2 2 2 4 4

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 5 5 5 5 10 10

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 5 5 3 2 8 7

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 1 1 1 1 2 2

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2010

Totals 61 55 48 46 109 101

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 275 of 590 

## Table 11 . Estimated acreage utilization for MIR604 plantings presented by state

and trial type for 2011 . Non

- PIP acres include plantings with conventional lines

used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 7 4 3 3 10 7

IA 5 4 3 3 8 7

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 9 8 6 6 15 14

IN 2 2 2 1 4 3

KS 1 1 1 1 2 2

KY 1 1 1 1 2 2

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 5 4 3 3 8 7

MO 2 2 2 2 4 4

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 5 5 5 5 10 10

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 5 5 3 2 8 7

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 1 1 1 1 2 2

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2011

Totals 61 55 48 46 109 101

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 276 of 590 

## Table 12 . Estimated acreage utilization for TC1507 plantings presented by state

and trial type for 2010 . Non

- PIP acres include plantings with conventional lines

used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 10 7 3 3 13 10

IA 5 5 4 4 9 9

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 10 8 6 6 16 14

IN 2 2 1 1 3 3

KS 2 1 2 1 4 2

KY 1 1 1 1 2 2

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 6 5 3 3 9 8

MO 2 2 2 2 4 4

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 7 6 5 4 12 10

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

O K 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 12 7 3 3 15 10

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 1 1 1 1 2 2

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2010

Totals 76 63 49 47 125 110

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 277 of 590 

## Table 13 . Estimated acreage utilization for TC1507 plantings presented by state

and trial type for 2011 . No n

- PIP acres include plantings with conventional lines

used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 10 7 3 3 1 3 10

IA 5 5 4 4 9 9

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 10 8 6 6 16 14

IN 2 2 1 1 3 3

KS 2 1 2 1 4 2

KY 1 1 1 1 2 2

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 6 5 3 3 9 8

MO 2 2 2 2 4 4

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 7 6 5 4 12 10

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 12 7 3 3 15 10

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 1 1 1 1 2 2

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2011

Totals 76 63 49 47 125 110

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 278 of 590 

## Table 14 . Estimated acreage utilization for 5307 plantings presented by state and

trial type fo r 2010 . Non

- PIP acres include plantings with conventional lines used as

controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 1 0 7 3 3 13 10

IA 12 10 8 8 20 18

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 10 8 6 6 16 14

IN 2 2 2 2 4 4

KS 2 1 2 2 4 3

KY 1 1 1 1 2 2

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 6 5 3 3 9 8

MO 3 3 2 2 5 5

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 8 8 6 6 14 14

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 12 7 3 3 15 10

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 1 1 1 1 2 2

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2010

Totals 85 71 55 55 140 126

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 279 of 590 

## Table 15 . Estimated acreage utilization for 5307 plantings presented by state and

trial type for 2011 . Non

- PIP acres include plantings with conventional lines used as

controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 2 2 3 3

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 7 4 3 3 10 7

IA 12 11 9 9 21 20

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 9 8 7 7 16 15

IN 2 2 2 1 4 3

KS 2 1 2 1 4 2

KY 1 1 1 1 2 2

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 5 4 3 3 8 7

MO 3 3 3 3 6 6

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 2 2 3 3

NE 8 7 6 6 14 13

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 2 2 1 1 3 3

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 7 4 3 3 10 7

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 2 2 1 1 3 3

TX 2 2 1 1 3 3

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 2 2 1 1 3 3

2011

Totals 79 68 60 58 139 126

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 280 of 590 

## Table 16 . Estimated acreage utilization for Bt11 x MIR162 plantings prese nted by

state and trial type for 2010

. Non

- PIP acres include plantings with conventional

lines used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 20 5 10 6 30 11

IA 10 8 6 6 16 14

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 9 8 6 6 15 14

IN 2 2 1 1 3 3

KS 2 2 1 1 3 3

KY 4 3 1 1 5 4

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 6 5 2 2 8 7

MO 3 3 2 2 5 5

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 2 2 3 3

NE 10 8 6 6 16 14

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 2 2 2 1 4 3

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 9 5 3 3 12 8

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 2 2 1 1 3 3

TX 2 2 1 1 3 3

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 2 2 1 1 3 3

2010

Totals 98 72 59 54 157 126

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 281 of 590 

## Table 17 . Estimated acreage utilization for Bt11 x MIR162 plantings presented by

state and trial type for 2011

. Non

- PIP acres include plantings with conventional

lines used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 20 5 10 6 30 11

IA 10 8 6 6 16 14

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 9 8 6 6 15 14

IN 2 2 1 1 3 3

KS 2 2 1 1 3 3

KY 4 3 1 1 5 4

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 6 5 2 2 8 7

MO 3 3 2 2 5 5

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 2 2 3 3

NE 10 8 6 6 16 14

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 2 2 2 1 4 3

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 9 5 3 3 12 8

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 2 2 1 1 3 3

TX 2 2 1 1 3 3

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 2 2 1 1 3 3

2011

Totals 98 72 59 54 157 126

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 282 of 590 

## Table 18 . Estimat ed acreage utilization for Bt11 x MIR604 plantings presented by

state and trial type for 2010

. Non

- PIP acres include plantings with conventional

lines used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PI P PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 7 5 3 3 10 8

IA 5 5 4 4 9 9

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 10 8 6 6 16 14

IN 2 2 2 2 4 4

KS 1 1 1 1 2 2

KY 1 1 1 1 2 2

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 6 5 3 3 9 8

MO 3 3 2 2 5 5

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 8 8 6 6 14 14

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 12 7 3 3 15 10

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 1 1 1 1 2 2

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2010 Totals 74 64 50 50 124 114

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 283 of 590 

## Table 19 . Estimated acreage utilization for Bt11 x MIR604

plantings presented by state and trial type for 2011

. Non

- PIP acres

include plantings with conventional lines used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 7 5 3 3 10 8

IA 5 5 4 4 9 9

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 10 8 6 6 16 14

IN 2 2 2 2 4 4

KS 1 1 1 1 2 2

KY 1 1 1 1 2 2

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 6 5 3 3 9 8

MO 3 3 2 2 5 5

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 8 8 6 6 14 14

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 12 7 3 3 15 10

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 1 1 1 1 2 2

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2011 Totals 74 64 50 50 124 114

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 284 of 590 

## Table 20 . Estimated acreage utilization for Bt11 x TC1507 plantings presented by

state and trial type for 2010

. Non

- PIP acres include plantings with conventional

lines used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 5 5 3 3 8 8

IA 5 5 5 4 10 9

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 9 8 6 6 15 14

IN 2 2 1 1 3 3

KS 2 2 1 1 3 3

KY 4 3 1 1 5 4

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 6 5 2 2 8 7

MO 3 3 2 2 5 5

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 2 2 3 3

NE 9 6 4 4 13 10

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 2 2 2 1 4 3

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 5 4 3 3 8 7

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 2 2 1 1 3 3

TX 2 2 1 1 3 3

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 2 2 1 1 3 3

2010 Totals 73 66 49 47 122 113

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 285 of 590 

## Table 21 . Estimated acreage utilization for Bt11 x TC1507 plantings

presented by state and trial type for 2011

. Non

- PIP acres include

plantings with conventional li nes used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 5 5 3 3 8 8

IA 5 5 5 4 10 9

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 9 8 6 6 15 14

IN 2 2 1 1 3 3

KS 2 2 1 1 3 3

KY 4 3 1 1 5 4

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 6 5 2 2 8 7

MO 3 3 2 2 5 5

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 2 2 3 3

NE 9 6 4 4 13 10

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 2 2 2 1 4 3

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 5 4 3 3 8 7

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 2 2 1 1 3 3

TX 2 2 1 1 3 3

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 2 2 1 1 3 3

2011 Totals 73 66 49 47 122 113

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 286 of 590 

## Table 22 . Estimated acreage utilization for Bt11 x 5307 plantings presented by state

and trial type for 2010

. Non

- PIP acres include plantings with conventional lines

used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 5 4 3 3 8 7

IA 10 8 6 6 16 14

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 10 8 6 6 16 14

IN 2 2 1 1 3 3

KS 1 1 1 1 2 2

KY 1 1 1 1 2 2

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 6 5 3 3 9 8

MO 2 1 2 1 4 2

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 6 5 4 4 10 9

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 5 5 3 3 8 8

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 1 1 1 1 2 2

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2010 Totals 67 59 49 48 116 107

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 287 of 590 

## Table 23 . Estimated acreage utilization for Bt11 x 5307 plantings

presented by state and trial type for 2011

. Non

- PIP acres include

plantings with conventional lines used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 5 4 3 3 8 7

IA 10 8 6 6 16 14

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 10 8 6 6 16 14

IN 2 2 1 1 3 3

KS 1 1 1 1 2 2

KY 1 1 1 1 2 2

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 6 5 3 3 9 8

MO 2 1 2 1 4 2

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 6 5 4 4 10 9

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 5 5 3 3 8 8

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 1 1 1 1 2 2

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2011 Totals 67 59 49 48 116 107

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 288 of 590 

## Table 24 . Estimated acreage utilization for DAS

- 59122

- 7 x MIR604 plantings

presented by stat e and trial type for 2010

. Non

- PIP acres include plantings with

conventional lines used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 4 4 2 2 6 6

IA 5 5 3 3 8 8

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 5 5 3 3 8 8

IN 1 1 1 1 2 2

KS 1 1 1 1 2 2

KY 1 1 1 1 2 2

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 3 2 3 3 6 5

MO 1 1 2 2 3 3

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 2 2 3 3 5 5

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 4 2 2 2 6 4

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 1 1 1 1 2 2

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2010 Totals 46 43 40 40 86 83

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 289 of 590 

## Table 25 . Estimated acreage utilization for DAS

- 59122

- 7 x MIR604 plantings

presented by state and trial type for 2011

. Non

- PIP acres include plantings with

conventional lines used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 4 4 2 2 6 6

IA 5 5 3 3 8 8

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 5 5 3 3 8 8

IN 1 1 1 1 2 2

KS 1 1 1 1 2 2

KY 1 1 1 1 2 2

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 3 2 3 3 6 5

MO 1 1 2 2 3 3

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 2 2 3 3 5 5

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 4 2 2 2 6 4

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 1 1 1 1 2 2

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2011

Totals 46 43 40 40 86 83

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 290 of 590 

## Table 26 . Estimated acreage utilization for TC1507 x DAS

- 59122

- 7 plantings

presented by state and trial type for 2010

. Non

- PIP acres include plantings with

conventional lines used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PI P Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 8 6 2 2 10 8

IA 6 4 2 2 8 6

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 5 5 3 2 8 7

IN 1 1 1 1 2 2

KS 1 1 1 1 2 2

KY 1 1 1 1 2 2

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 3 2 1 1 4 3

MO 1 1 1 1 2 2

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 2 2 3 3

NE 5 3 2 2 7 5

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 6 3 2 2 8 5

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 1 1 1 1 2 2

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2010 Totals 56 46 36 35 92 81

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 291 of 590 

## Table 27 . Estimated acreage utilization for TC1507 x DAS

59122

- 7 plantings presented by state and trial type for 2011

. Non

- PIP acres include plantings with conventional lines used as

controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 8 6 2 2 10 8

IA 6 4 2 2 8 6

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 5 5 3 2 8 7

IN 1 1 1 1 2 2

KS 1 1 1 1 2 2

KY 1 1 1 1 2 2

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 3 2 1 1 4 3

MO 1 1 1 1 2 2

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 2 2 3 3

NE 5 3 2 2 7 5

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 6 3 2 2 8 5

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 1 1 1 1 2 2

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

201 1 Totals 56 46 36 35 92 81

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 292 of 590 

## Table 28 . Estimated acreage utilization for DAS

- 59122

- 7 x 5307 plantings

presented by state and trial type for 2010

. Non

- PIP acres include plantings with

conventional lines used as controls or borders.

Effi cacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 3 2 3 2 6 4

IA 4 4 3 3 7 7

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 5 5 3 3 8 8

IN 1 1 1 1 2 2

KS 1 1 1 1 2 2

KY 1 1 1 1 2 2

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 2 2 2 2 4 4

MO 1 1 1 1 2 2

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 2 2 2 2 4 4

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 4 2 2 2 6 4

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 1 1 1 1 2 2

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2010 Totals 43 40 38 37 81 77

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 293 of 590 

## Table 29 . Estimated acreage utilization for DAS

- 59122

- 7 x 5307

plantings presented by state and trial type for 2011

. Non

- PIP acres

include plantings with conventional lines used as controls or

borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 3 2 3 2 6 4

IA 4 4 3 3 7 7

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 5 5 3 3 8 8

IN 1 1 1 1 2 2

KS 1 1 1 1 2 2

KY 1 1 1 1 2 2

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 2 2 2 2 4 4

MO 1 1 1 1 2 2

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 2 2 2 2 4 4

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 4 2 2 2 6 4

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 1 1 1 1 2 2

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2011

Totals 43 40 38 37 81 77

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 294 of 590 

## Table 30 . Estimated acreage utilization for MIR162 x TC1507 plantings presented

by state and trial type for 2010

. Non

- PIP acres include plantings with conventional

lines used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 7 5 3 3 10 8

IA 7 5 4 4 11 9

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 10 5 6 6 16 11

IN 2 2 2 2 4 4

KS 2 2 2 2 4 4

KY 5 3 2 2 7 5

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 10 5 3 3 13 8

MO 3 3 2 2 5 5

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 10 8 6 6 16 14

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 2 2 1 1 3 3

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 10 8 3 3 13 11

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 1 1 1 1 2 2

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2010

Totals 86 66 52 52 138 118

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 295 of 590 

## Table 31 . Estimated acreage utilization for MIR162 x TC1507 plantings presented

by state and trial type for 2011

. Non

- PIP acres include plantings with conventional

lines used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 7 5 3 3 10 8

IA 7 5 4 4 11 9

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 10 5 6 6 16 11

IN 2 2 2 2 4 4

KS 2 2 2 2 4 4

KY 5 3 2 2 7 5

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 10 5 3 3 13 8

MO 3 3 2 2 5 5

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 10 8 6 6 16 14

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 2 2 1 1 3 3

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 10 8 3 3 13 11

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 1 1 1 1 2 2

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2011

Totals 86 66 52 52 138 118

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 296 of 590 

## Table 32 . Estimated acreage utilization for MIR604 x TC1507 plantings presented

by state and trial ty pe for 2010

. Non

- PIP acres include plantings with conventional

lines used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 7 5 3 3 10 8

IA 7 5 4 4 11 9

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 10 5 6 6 16 11

IN 2 2 2 2 4 4

KS 2 2 2 2 4 4

KY 5 3 2 2 7 5

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 10 5 3 3 13 8

MO 3 3 2 2 5 5

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 10 8 6 6 16 14

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 2 2 1 1 3 3

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 10 8 3 3 13 11

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 1 1 1 1 2 2

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2010

Totals 86 66 52 52 138 118

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 297 of 590 

## Table 33 . Estimated acreage utilization for MIR604 x TC1507 plant ings presented

by state and trial type for 2011

. Non

- PIP acres include plantings with conventional

lines used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 7 5 3 3 10 8

IA 7 5 4 4 11 9

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 10 5 6 6 16 11

IN 2 2 2 2 4 4

KS 2 2 2 2 4 4

KY 5 3 2 2 7 5

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 10 5 3 3 13 8

MO 3 3 2 2 5 5

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 10 8 6 6 16 14

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 10 8 3 3 13 11

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 1 1 1 1 2 2

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2011

Totals 85 65 52 52 137 117

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 298 of 590 

## Table 34 . Estimated acreage utilization f or MIR604 x 5307 plantings presented by

state and trial type for 2010

. Non

- PIP acres include plantings with conventional

lines used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 5 4 2 2 7 6

IA 10 8 6 6 16 14

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 9 8 6 6 15 14

IN 2 2 1 1 3 3

KS 2 2 1 1 3 3

KY 4 3 1 1 5 4

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 6 5 3 3 9 8

MO 3 3 2 2 5 5

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 8 7 6 6 14 13

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 5 3 3 3 8 6

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 2 1 1 1 3 2

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2010

Totals 74 64 50 50 124 114

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 299 of 590 

## Table 35 . Es timated acreage utilization for MIR604 x 5307 plantings presented by

state and trial type for 2011

. Non

- PIP acres include plantings with conventional

lines used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 5 4 2 2 7 6

IA 10 8 6 6 16 14

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 9 8 6 6 15 14

IN 2 2 1 1 3 3

KS 2 2 1 1 3 3

KY 4 3 1 1 5 4

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

M N 6 5 3 3 9 8

MO 3 3 2 2 5 5

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 8 7 6 6 14 13

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 5 3 3 3 8 6

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 2 1 1 1 3 2

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2011

Totals 74 64 50 50 124 114

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 300 of 590 

## Table 36 . Estimated acreage utilization for Bt11 x DAS

- 59122

- 7 x TC1507

plantings presented by state and trial type for 2010

. Non

- PIP acres include

plantings with conventional lines used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 7 5 3 3 10 8

IA 7 5 4 4 11 9

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 10 5 6 6 16 11

IN 2 2 2 2 4 4

KS 2 2 2 2 4 4

KY 5 3 2 2 7 5

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 10 5 3 3 13 8

MO 3 3 2 2 5 5

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 10 8 6 6 16 14

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 2 2 1 1 3 3

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 10 8 3 3 13 11

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 1 1 1 1 2 2

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

W I 1 1 1 1 2 2

2010 Totals 86 66 52 52 138 118

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 301 of 590 

## Table 37 . Estimated acreage utilization for Bt11 x DAS

- 59122

- 7 x TC1507

plantings presented by state and trial type for 2011

. Non

- PIP acres include

plantings with conventional lines used as controls or bo rders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 7 5 3 3 10 8

IA 7 5 4 4 11 9

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 10 5 6 6 16 11

IN 2 2 2 2 4 4

KS 2 2 2 2 4 4

KY 5 3 2 2 7 5

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 10 5 3 3 13 8

MO 3 3 2 2 5 5

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 10 8 6 6 16 14

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 2 2 1 1 3 3

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 10 8 3 3 13 11

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 1 1 1 1 2 2

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2011

Totals 86 66 52 52 138 118

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 302 of 590 

## Table 38 . Estimated acreage utilization for Bt11 x MIR162 x MIR604 plantings

presented by state and trial type for 2010

. Non

- PIP acres include plantings with

convention al lines used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 2 1 1 1 3 2

GA 2 1 1 1 3 2

HI 12 8 3 3 15 11

IA 8 5 3 3 11 8

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 7 5 3 3 10 8

IN 1 1 1 1 2 2

KS 1 1 1 1 2 2

KY 2 1 1 1 3 2

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 4 3 1 1 5 4

MO 1 3 1 1 2 4

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 7 3 2 2 9 5

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 5 3 2 2 7 5

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 1 1 1 1 2 2

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2010 Totals 69 52 37 37 106 89

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 303 of 590 

## Table 39 . Estimated acreage utilization for Bt11 x MIR162 x

MIR604 plantings presented by state and trial type for 2011

. Non

- PIP ac res include plantings with conventional lines used as

controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 2 1 1 1 3 2

GA 2 1 1 1 3 2

HI 12 8 3 3 15 11

I A 8 5 3 3 11 8

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 7 5 3 3 10 8

IN 1 1 1 1 2 2

KS 1 1 1 1 2 2

KY 2 1 1 1 3 2

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 4 3 1 1 5 4

MO 1 3 1 1 2 4

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 7 3 2 2 9 5

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 5 3 2 2 7 5

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 1 1 1 1 2 2

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2011 Totals 69 52 37 37 106 89

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 304 of 590 

## Table 40 . Estimated acreage utilization for Bt11 x MIR162 x TC1507 plantings

presented by state and trial typ e for 2010

. Non

- PIP acres include plantings with

conventional lines used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 4 3 3 3 7 6

IA 10 8 6 6 16 14

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 9 8 6 6 15 14

IN 2 2 1 1 3 3

KS 2 2 1 1 3 3

KY 4 3 2 2 6 5

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 6 5 3 3 9 8

MO 3 3 3 3 6 6

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 8 7 6 6 14 13

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 2 2 1 1 3 3

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 5 4 3 3 8 7

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 2 2 1 1 3 3

TX 2 2 2 2 4 4

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2010

Totals 75 67 54 54 129 121

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 305 of 590 

## Table 41 . Estimated acreage utilization for Bt11 x MIR162 x TC1507 plantin gs

presented by state and trial type for 2011

. Non

- PIP acres include plantings with

conventional lines used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 4 3 3 3 7 6

IA 10 8 6 6 16 14

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 9 8 6 6 15 14

IN 2 2 1 1 3 3

KS 2 2 1 1 3 3

KY 4 3 2 2 6 5

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 6 5 3 3 9 8

MO 3 3 3 3 6 6

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 8 7 6 6 14 13

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 2 2 1 1 3 3

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 5 4 3 3 8 7

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 2 2 1 1 3 3

TX 2 2 2 2 4 4

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2011

Totals 75 67 54 54 129 121

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 306 of 590 

## Table 42 . Estimated acreage utilization for Bt11 x MIR604 x TC1507 plantings

presented by state and trial type for 2010

. Non

- PIP acres include plantings with

conventional lines used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 7 5 3 3 10 8

IA 10 8 6 6 16 14

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 9 8 6 6 15 14

IN 2 2 1 1 3 3

KS 2 2 1 1 3 3

KY 3 2 1 1 4 3

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 6 5 3 3 9 8

MO 3 3 3 3 6 6

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 8 7 6 6 14 13

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 5 4 3 3 8 7

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 2 2 1 1 3 3

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2010 Totals 75 66 52 52 127 118

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 307 of 590 

## Table 43 . Estimated acreage utilization for Bt11 x MIR604 x TC1507 plantings

presented by state and trial type for 2011

. Non

- PIP acres include plantings with

conventional lines used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acre s

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 7 5 3 3 10 8

IA 10 8 6 6 16 14

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 9 8 6 6 15 14

IN 2 2 1 1 3 3

KS 2 2 1 1 3 3

KY 3 2 1 1 4 3

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 6 5 3 3 9 8

MO 3 3 3 3 6 6

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 8 7 6 6 14 13

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 5 4 3 3 8 7

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 2 2 1 1 3 3

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2011

Totals 75 66 52 52 127 118

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 308 of 590 

## Table 44 . Estimated acreage utilization for Bt11 x MIR604 x 5307 plantings

presented by state and trial type for 2010

. Non

- PIP acres include plantings with

conventional lines used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 7 5 3 3 10 8

IA 8 6 8 8 16 14

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 9 8 6 6 15 14

IN 2 2 1 1 3 3

KS 1 1 1 1 2 2

KY 1 1 1 1 2 2

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 6 5 2 2 8 7

MO 3 3 2 2 5 5

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 8 7 6 6 14 13

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 2 2 1 1 3 3

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 5 3 3 3 8 6

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 2 2 1 1 3 3

TX 2 2 1 1 3 3

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2010

Totals 72 63 52 52 124 115

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 309 of 590 

## Table 45 . Estimated acreage utilization for Bt11 x MIR604 x 5307 plantings

presented by state and trial type for 2011

. Non

- PIP acres include plantings with

conventional lines us ed as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 7 5 3 3 10 8

IA 8 6 8 8 16 14

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 9 8 6 6 15 14

I N 2 2 1 1 3 3

KS 1 1 1 1 2 2

KY 1 1 1 1 2 2

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 6 5 2 2 8 7

MO 3 3 2 2 5 5

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 8 7 6 6 14 13

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 2 2 1 1 3 3

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 5 3 3 3 8 6

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 2 2 1 1 3 3

TX 2 2 1 1 3 3

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2011

Totals 72 63 52 52 124 115

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 310 of 590 

## Table 46 . Estimated acreage utilization for DAS

- 59122

- 7 x MIR604 x TC1507

plantings presented by state and trial type for 2010

. Non

- PIP acres include

pla ntings with conventional lines used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 10 8 4 4 14 12

IA 10 8 6 6 16 14

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 10 8 6 6 16 14

IN 2 2 1 1 3 3

KS 2 2 2 2 4 4

KY 7 5 1 1 8 6

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 10 8 3 3 13 11

MO 3 3 3 3 6 6

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 10 8 6 6 16 14

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 2 2 1 1 3 3

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 7 5 3 3 10 8

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 2 2 1 1 3 3

TX 2 2 1 1 3 3

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 2 2 1 1 3 3

2010

Totals 94 80 54 54 148 134

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 311 of 590 

## Table 47 . Estimated acreage utilization for DAS

- 59122

- 7 x MIR604 x TC1507

plantings presented by state and trial type for 2011

. Non

- PIP acres include

plantings with conventional lines used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

G A 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 10 8 4 4 14 12

IA 10 8 6 6 16 14

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 10 8 6 6 16 14

IN 2 2 1 1 3 3

KS 2 2 2 2 4 4

KY 7 5 1 1 8 6

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 10 8 3 3 13 11

MO 3 3 3 3 6 6

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 10 8 6 6 16 14

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 2 2 1 1 3 3

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 7 5 3 3 10 8

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 2 2 1 1 3 3

TX 2 2 1 1 3 3

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 2 2 1 1 3 3

2011

Totals 94 80 54 54 148 134

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 3 12 of 590 

## Table 48 . Estimated acreage utilization for MIR162 x TC1507 x 5307 plantings

presented by state and trial type for 2010

. Non

- PIP acres include plantings with

conventional lines used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 1 1 1 1 2 2

IA 1 1 1 1 2 2

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 1 1 1 1 2 2

IN 1 1 1 1 2 2

KS 1 1 1 1 2 2

KY 1 1 1 1 2 2

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 1 1 1 1 2 2

MO 1 1 1 1 2 2

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 1 1 1 1 2 2

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 1 1 1 1 2 2

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 1 1 1 1 2 2

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2010

Totals 29 29 29 29 58 58

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 313 of 590 

## Table 49 . Estimated acreage util ization for MIR162 x TC1507 x 5307 plantings

presented by state and trial type for 2011

. Non

- PIP acres include plantings with

conventional lines used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 1 1 1 1 2 2

IA 1 1 1 1 2 2

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 1 1 1 1 2 2

IN 1 1 1 1 2 2

KS 1 1 1 1 2 2

KY 1 1 1 1 2 2

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 1 1 1 1 2 2

MO 1 1 1 1 2 2

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 1 1 1 1 2 2

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 1 1 1 1 2 2

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 1 1 1 1 2 2

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2011

Totals 29 29 29 29 58 58

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 314 of 590 

## Table 50 . Est imated acreage utilization for MIR604 x TC1507 x 5307 plantings

presented by state and trial type for 2010

. Non

- PIP acres include plantings with

conventional lines used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 30 20 6 6 36 26

IA 30 20 8 8 38 28

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 20 15 6 6 26 21

IN 2 2 1 1 3 3

KS 2 2 1 1 3 3

KY 5 3 2 2 7 5

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 10 8 3 3 13 11

MO 3 3 3 3 6 6

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 2 2 3 3

NE 20 15 6 6 26 21

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 2 2 1 1 3 3

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 15 12 3 3 18 15

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 2 2 1 1 3 3

TX 2 2 1 1 3 3

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2010

Totals 159 122 59 59 218 181

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 315 of 590 

## Table 51 . Estimated acreage utilization for MIR604 x TC1507 x 5307 plantings

presented by state and trial type for 2011

. Non

- PIP acres include plantings with

conventional lines used as controls or borders.

Effic acy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 30 20 6 6 36 26

IA 30 20 8 8 38 28

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 20 15 6 6 26 21

IN 2 2 1 1 3 3

KS 2 2 1 1 3 3

KY 5 3 2 2 7 5

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 10 8 3 3 13 11

MO 3 3 3 3 6 6

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 2 2 3 3

NE 20 15 6 6 26 21

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 2 2 1 1 3 3

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 15 12 3 3 18 15

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 2 2 1 1 3 3

TX 2 2 1 1 3 3

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2011

Totals 159 122 59 59 218 181

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 316 of 590 

## Table 52 . Estimated acreage utilization for Bt11 x DAS59122

- 7 x MIR162 x

TC1507 plantings presented by state and trial type for 2010

. Non

- PIP acres include

plantings with conventional lines used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 1 1 1 1 2 2

IA 1 1 1 1 2 2

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 1 1 1 1 2 2

IN 1 1 1 1 2 2

KS 1 1 1 1 2 2

KY 1 1 1 1 2 2

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 1 1 1 1 2 2

MO 1 1 1 1 2 2

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 1 1 1 1 2 2

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 1 1 1 1 2 2

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 1 1 1 1 2 2

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2010 Totals 29 29 29 29 58 58

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 317 of 590 

## Table 53 . Estimated acreage utilization for Bt11 x DAS59122

- 7

x MIR162 x TC1507 plantings presented by state and t rial

type for 2011

. Non

- PIP acres include plantings with

conventional lines used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 1 1 1 1 2 2

IA 1 1 1 1 2 2

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 1 1 1 1 2 2

IN 1 1 1 1 2 2

KS 1 1 1 1 2 2

KY 1 1 1 1 2 2

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 1 1 1 1 2 2

MO 1 1 1 1 2 2

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 1 1 1 1 2 2

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 1 1 1 1 2 2

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 1 1 1 1 2 2

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2011 Totals 29 29 29 29 58 58

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 318 of 590 

## Table 54 . Estimated acreage utilization for Bt11 x DAS59122

- 7 x MIR604 x

T C1507 plantings presented by state and trial type for 2010

. Non

- PIP acres include

plantings with conventional lines used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 7 4 2 2 9 6

IA 12 11 9 9 21 20

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 9 8 6 6 15 14

IN 2 2 2 2 4 4

KS 2 2 2 2 4 4

KY 1 1 1 1 2 2

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 7 6 4 4 11 10

MO 3 3 3 3 6 6

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 8 7 7 7 15 14

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 6 4 2 2 8 6

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 2 2 2 2 4 4

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 2 2 2 2 4 4

2010 Totals 78 69 59 59 137 128

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 319 of 590 

## Table 55

. Estimated acreage utilization for Bt11 x DAS59122

- 7

x MIR604 x TC1507 plantings presented by state and trial

type for 2011

. Non

- PIP acres include plantings with

conventional lines used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

S tate PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 7 4 2 2 9 6

IA 12 11 9 9 21 20

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 9 8 6 6 15 14

IN 2 2 2 2 4 4

KS 2 2 2 2 4 4

KY 1 1 1 1 2 2

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 7 6 4 4 11 10

MO 3 3 3 3 6 6

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 8 7 7 7 15 14

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 6 4 2 2 8 6

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 2 2 2 2 4 4

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 2 2 2 2 4 4

2011 Totals 78 69 59 59 137 128

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 320 of 590 

## Table 56 . Estimated acreage utilization for Bt11 x MIR162 x MIR604 x TC1507

plantings presented by state and trial type for 2010

. Non

- PIP acres include

plantings with conventional lines used as controls o r borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 3 3 2 2 5 5

IA 5 5 3 3 8 8

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 5 5 4 4 9 9

IN 1 1 1 1 2 2

KS 1 1 1 1 2 2

KY 1 1 1 1 2 2

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 3 3 1 1 4 4

MO 1 1 1 1 2 2

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 2 2 2 2 4 4

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 2 2 1 1 3 3

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 1 1 1 1 2 2

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2010 Totals 43 43 36 36 79 79

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 321 of 590 

## Table 57 . Estimated acreage utilization for Bt11 x MIR162 x MIR604 x TC1507

plantings presented by state and trial type for 2011

. Non

- PIP acres include

plantings with c onventional lines used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 3 3 2 2 5 5

IA 5 5 3 3 8 8

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

I L 5 5 4 4 9 9

IN 1 1 1 1 2 2

KS 1 1 1 1 2 2

KY 1 1 1 1 2 2

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 3 3 1 1 4 4

MO 1 1 1 1 2 2

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 2 2 2 2 4 4

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 2 2 1 1 3 3

S C 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 1 1 1 1 2 2

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2011

Totals 43 43 36 36 79 79

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 322 of 590 

## Table 58 . Estimated acreage utilization for Bt11 x MIR162 x MIR604 x 5307

plantings presented by state and trial type for 2010

. Non

- PIP acre s include

plantings with conventional lines used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 3 3 3 3 6 6

IA 5 5 3 3 8 8

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 5 5 4 4 9 9

IN 1 1 1 1 2 2

KS 1 1 1 1 2 2

KY 1 1 1 1 2 2

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 3 3 1 1 4 4

MO 1 1 1 1 2 2

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 2 2 1 1 3 3

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 2 2 1 1 3 3

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 1 1 1 1 2 2

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2010 Totals 43 43 36 36 79 79

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 323 of 590 

## Table 59 . Estimated acreage utilization for Bt11 x MIR162 x

MIR604 x 5307 plantings presented by stat e and trial type for

2011

. Non

- PIP acres include plantings with conventional lines

used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 3 3 3 3 6 6

IA 5 5 3 3 8 8

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 5 5 4 4 9 9

IN 1 1 1 1 2 2

KS 1 1 1 1 2 2

KY 1 1 1 1 2 2

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 3 3 1 1 4 4

MO 1 1 1 1 2 2

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 2 2 1 1 3 3

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 2 2 1 1 3 3

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 1 1 1 1 2 2

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2011 Totals 43 43 36 36 79 79

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 324 of 590 

## Table 60 . Estimated acreage utilization for Bt11 x MIR604 x TC1507 x 5307

plantings presented by state and trial type for 2010

. Non

- PIP acres include

plantings with conventional lines used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 5 3 3 3 8 6

IA 7 5 5 5 12 10

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 12 10 6 6 18 16

IN 2 2 1 1 3 3

KS 2 2 1 1 3 3

KY 3 2 1 1 4 3

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 6 5 4 4 10 9

MO 3 3 2 2 5 5

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 5 4 3 3 8 7

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 5 4 2 2 7 6

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 2 2 1 1 3 3

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 2 2 1 1 3 3

Totals 71 61 47 47 118 108

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 325 of 590 

## Table 61 . Estimated acreag e utilization for Bt11 x MIR604 x

TC1507 x 5307 plantings presented by state and trial type for

2011

. Non

- PIP acres include plantings with conventional lines

used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP No n

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 5 3 3 3 8 6

IA 7 5 5 5 12 10

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 12 10 6 6 18 16

IN 2 2 1 1 3 3

KS 2 2 1 1 3 3

KY 3 2 1 1 4 3

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 6 5 4 4 10 9

MO 3 3 2 2 5 5

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 5 4 3 3 8 7

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 5 4 2 2 7 6

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 2 2 1 1 3 3

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 2 2 1 1 3 3

2011 Totals 71 61 47 4 7 118 108

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 326 of 590 

## Table 62 . Estimated acreage utilization for MIR162 x MIR604 x TC1507 x 5307

plantings presented by state and trial type for 2010

. Non

- PIP acres include

plantings with conventional lines used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regula tory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 1 1 1 1 2 2

IA 1 1 1 1 2 2

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 1 1 1 1 2 2

IN 1 1 1 1 2 2

KS 1 1 1 1 2 2

KY 1 1 1 1 2 2

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 1 1 1 1 2 2

MO 1 1 1 1 2 2

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 1 1 1 1 2 2

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 1 1 1 1 2 2

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 1 1 1 1 2 2

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2010 Totals 29 29 29 29 58 58

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 327 of 590 

## Table 63 . Estimated acreage utilization for MIR162 x MIR604

x TC1507 x 5307 plantings presented by state and trial type

for 2011

. Non

- PIP acres include plantings with conventional

lines used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 1 1 1 1 2 2

IA 1 1 1 1 2 2

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 1 1 1 1 2 2

IN 1 1 1 1 2 2

KS 1 1 1 1 2 2

KY 1 1 1 1 2 2

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 1 1 1 1 2 2

MO 1 1 1 1 2 2

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 1 1 1 1 2 2

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 1 1 1 1 2 2

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 1 1 1 1 2 2

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2011 Totals 29 29 29 29 58 58

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 328 of 590 

## Table 64 . Estimated acreage utilization for BT11 x MIR162 x MIR604 x TC1507 x

5307 plantings presented by state and trial type for 2010

. Non

- PIP acres include

plantings with conventional lines used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 5 4 2 2 7 6

IA 12 11 8 8 20 1 9

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 12 10 6 6 18 16

IN 2 2 1 1 3 3

KS 2 2 1 1 3 3

KY 2 2 1 1 3 3

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 6 5 3 3 9 8

MO 3 3 2 2 5 5

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 5 4 3 3 8 7

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 5 3 2 2 7 5

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 2 2 1 1 3 3

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2010 Totals 74 66 48 48 122 114

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 329 of 590 

## Table 65 . Estimated acreage utilization for Bt11 x MIR162 x

MIR604 x TC1507 x 5307 plantings presen ted by state and

trial type for 2011

. Non

- PIP acres include plantings with

conventional lines used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 5 4 2 2 7 6

IA 12 11 8 8 20 19

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 12 10 6 6 18 16

IN 2 2 1 1 3 3

KS 2 2 1 1 3 3

KY 2 2 1 1 3 3

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 6 5 3 3 9 8

MO 3 3 2 2 5 5

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 5 4 3 3 8 7

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 5 3 2 2 7 5

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 2 2 1 1 3 3

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2011 Totals 74 66 48 48 122 114

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 330 of 590 

## Table 66 . Estimated acreage utilization for Bt11x DAS

- 59122

- 7 x MIR162 x

MIR604 x TC1507 plantings presented by state and trial type for 2010

. Non

- PIP

acres include plantings with conventional lines used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 5 4 2 2 7 6

IA 12 11 8 8 20 19

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 9 8 6 6 15 14

IN 2 2 1 1 3 3

KS 1 1 1 1 2 2

KY 2 2 1 1 3 3

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 5 5 3 3 8 8

MO 3 3 2 2 5 5

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 8 7 7 7 15 14

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 5 4 2 2 7 6

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 2 2 1 1 3 3

TX 1 2 1 1 2 3

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2010 Totals 72 68 52 52 124 120

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 331 of 590 

## Table 67 . Estimated acreage utilization for Bt11x DAS

- 59122

- 7

x MIR162 x MIR604 x TC1507 plantings presented by state

and trial type for 2011

. Non

- PIP acres include plantings with

conventional lines used as controls or borders.

Eff icacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 5 4 2 2 7 6

IA 12 11 8 8 20 19

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 9 8 6 6 15 14

IN 2 2 1 1 3 3

KS 1 1 1 1 2 2

K Y 2 2 1 1 3 3

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 5 5 3 3 8 8

MO 3 3 2 2 5 5

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 1 1 2 2

NE 8 7 7 7 15 14

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 5 4 2 2 7 6

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 2 2 1 1 3 3

TX 1 2 1 1 2 3

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2011

Totals 72 68 52 52 124 120

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 332 of 590 

## Table 68 . Estimated acreage utilization for Bt11x DAS

- 59122

- 7 x MIR162 x

MIR604 x TC1507 x 5307 plantings presented by state and trial type for 2010

. Non

PIP acres include plantings wit h conventional lines used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 5 4 2 2 7 6

IA 9 7 6 6 15 13

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 9 8 6 6 15 14

IN 2 2 1 1 3 3

KS 1 1 1 1 2 2

KY 2 1 1 1 3 2

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 6 5 3 3 9 8

MO 3 3 2 2 5 5

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 2 2 3 3

NE 6 5 4 4 10 9

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 5 4 2 2 7 6

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 2 2 1 1 3 3

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2010

Totals 68 60 48 48 116 108

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 333 of 590 

## Table 69 . Estimated acreage utilization for Bt11x DAS

- 59122

- 7 x MIR162 x

MIR604 x TC1507 x 5307 plantings presented by state and trial type for 2011

. Non

PIP acres include plantings with conventional lines used as controls or borders.

Efficacy Regulatory Total Acres

State PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP PIP Non

- PIP

AR 1 1 1 1 2 2

CA 1 1 1 1 2 2

CO 1 1 1 1 2 2

FL 1 1 1 1 2 2

GA 1 1 1 1 2 2

HI 5 4 2 2 7 6

IA 9 7 6 6 15 13

ID 1 1 1 1 2 2

IL 9 8 6 6 15 14

IN 2 2 1 1 3 3

KS 1 1 1 1 2 2

KY 2 1 1 1 3 2

LA 1 1 1 1 2 2

MD 1 1 1 1 2 2

MI 1 1 1 1 2 2

MN 6 5 3 3 9 8

MO 3 3 2 2 5 5

MS 1 1 1 1 2 2

NC 1 1 2 2 3 3

NE 6 5 4 4 10 9

NY 1 1 1 1 2 2

OH 1 1 1 1 2 2

OK 1 1 1 1 2 2

PR 5 4 2 2 7 6

SC 1 1 1 1 2 2

SD 2 2 1 1 3 3

TX 1 1 1 1 2 2

WA 1 1 1 1 2 2

WI 1 1 1 1 2 2

2011

Totals 68 60 48 48 116 108

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 334 of 590 

## Table 70

. Proposed Active Ingredient Quantities by State for 2010 planting y ear.

Active Ingredient in the Planting Seed (g)

State 

### Planting

Seed (lb) Cry1Ab Cry34 Cry35 Vip3A mCry3A Cry1F eCry3.1Ab

AR 

### 1320 0.10 70.20 0.97 2.42 1.88 1.53 88.02

CA 

### 1320 0.10 70.20 0.97 2.42 1.88 1.53 88.02

CO 

### 1320 0.10 70.20 0.97 2.42 1.88 1. 53 88.02

FL 

### 1360 0.10 72.33 1.00 2.49 1.93 1.58 90.69

GA 

### 1340 0.10 71.26 0.98 2.45 1.91 1.55 89.35

HI 

### 6540 0.48 347.81 4.79 11.98 9.30 7.58 436.10

IA 

### 8340 0.61 443.54 6.10 15.28 11.87 9.67 556.13

ID 

### 1320 0.10 70.20 0.97 2.42 1.88 1.53 88.02

IL 

### 8820 0 .64 469.06 6.45 16.16 12.55 10.22 588.13

IN 

### 1980 0.14 105.30 1.45 3.63 2.82 2.30 132.03

KS 

### 1840 0.13 97.85 1.35 3.37 2.62 2.13 122.69

KY 

### 2260 0.16 120.19 1.65 4.14 3.22 2.62 150.70

LA 

### 1320 0.10 70.20 0.97 2.42 1.88 1.53 88.02

MD 

### 1320 0.10 70.20 0.97 2 .42 1.88 1.53 88.02

MI 

### 1320 0.10 70.20 0.97 2.42 1.88 1.53 88.02

MN 

### 5280 0.38 280.80 3.86 9.67 7.51 6.12 352.08

MO 

### 2760 0.20 146.78 2.02 5.06 3.93 3.20 184.04

MS 

### 1320 0.10 70.20 0.97 2.42 1.88 1.53 88.02

NC 

### 1420 0.10 75.52 1.04 2.60 2.02 1.65 94.69

N E 

### 7060 0.51 375.46 5.17 12.93 10.04 8.18 470.77

NY 

### 1320 0.10 70.20 0.97 2.42 1.88 1.53 88.02

OH 

### 1540 0.11 81.90 1.13 2.82 2.19 1.79 102.69

OK 

### 1320 0.10 70.20 0.97 2.42 1.88 1.53 88.02

PR 

### 5720 0.42 304.20 4.19 10.48 8.14 6.63 381.42

SC 

### 1320 0.10 70.20 0.97 2.42 1.88 1.53 88.02

SD 

### 1600 0.12 85.09 1.17 2.93 2.28 1.85 106.69

TX 

### 1460 0.11 77.65 1.07 2.67 2.08 1.69 97.36

WA 

### 1320 0.10 70.20 0.97 2.42 1.88 1.53 88.02

WI 

### 1440 0.10 76.58 1.05 2.64 2.05 1.67 96.02

2010

Totals 

### 76600 5.57 4073.73 56.06 140.32 108.98 88.79 5107.83

### Syngenta 5 307

- EPA

- 7 Page 335 of 590 

## Table 71

. Proposed Active Ingredient Quantities by State for 2011 planting year.

Active Ingredient in the Planting Seed (g)

State 

### Planting

Seed (lb) Cry1Ab Cry34 Cry35 Vip3A mCry3A Cry1F eCry3.1Ab

AR 

### 1320 0.10 70.20 0.97 2.42 1.88 1.53 88.02

CA 

### 1320 0.10 70.20 0.97 2.42 1.88 1.53 88.02

CO 

### 1340 0.10 71.26 0.98 2.45 1.91 1.55 89.35

FL 

### 1360 0.10 72.33 1.00 2.49 1.93 1.58 90.69

GA 

### 1340 0.10 71.26 0.98 2.45 1.91 1.55 89.35

HI 

### 6480 0.47 344.62 4.74 11.87 9.22 7.51 432.10

I A 

### 8360 0.61 444.60 6.12 15.31 11.89 9.69 557.46

ID 

### 1320 0.10 70.20 0.97 2.42 1.88 1.53 88.02

IL 

### 8820 0.64 469.06 6.45 16.16 12.55 10.22 588.13

IN 

### 1980 0.14 105.30 1.45 3.63 2.82 2.30 132.03

KS 

### 1840 0.13 97.85 1.35 3.37 2.62 2.13 122.69

KY 

### 2260 0.16 12 0.19 1.65 4.14 3.22 2.62 150.70

LA 

### 1320 0.10 70.20 0.97 2.42 1.88 1.53 88.02

MD 

### 1320 0.10 70.20 0.97 2.42 1.88 1.53 88.02

MI 

### 1320 0.10 70.20 0.97 2.42 1.88 1.53 88.02

MN 

### 5260 0.38 279.74 3.85 9.64 7.48 6.10 350.75

MO 

### 2780 0.20 147.85 2.03 5.09 3.96 3. 22 185.38

MS 

### 1320 0.10 70.20 0.97 2.42 1.88 1.53 88.02

NC 

### 1440 0.10 76.58 1.05 2.64 2.05 1.67 96.02

NE 

### 7060 0.51 375.46 5.17 12.93 10.04 8.18 470.77

NY 

### 1320 0.10 70.20 0.97 2.42 1.88 1.53 88.02

OH 

### 1540 0.11 81.90 1.13 2.82 2.19 1.79 102.69

OK 

### 1320 0. 10 70.20 0.97 2.42 1.88 1.53 88.02

PR 

### 5620 0.41 298.88 4.11 10.29 8.00 6.51 374.75

SC 

### 1320 0.10 70.20 0.97 2.42 1.88 1.53 88.02

SD 

### 1620 0.12 86.15 1.19 2.97 2.30 1.88 108.02

TX 

### 1480 0.11 78.71 1.08 2.71 2.11 1.72 98.69

WA 

### 1320 0.10 70.20 0.97 2.42 1.8 8 1.53 88.02

WI 

### 1460 0.11 77.65 1.07 2.67 2.08 1.69 97.36

2011

Totals 

### 76560 5.57 4071.60 56.03 140.24 108.92 88.74 5105.16

### Syngenta 5307

- EPA

- 7 Page 336 of 590 

# THIS PAGE

INTENTIONALLY

BLANK

### Syngenta 5307

- EPA

- 7 Page 337 of 590 

## G.3

. Details of the Proposed Progra m

Crop:

Corn ( Zea mays L.)

Event 5307 corn: Coleopteran

- protected corn, transformed with vector pSYN 12274

encoding an eCry3.1Ab insecticidal protein. eCry3.1Ab is an engineered chimera of

mCry3A and Cry1Ab. Th e proposed program contains inbreds and hybrids of Event

5307 corn, and hybrids created by crossing Event 5307 to other transgenic cor n events:

Bt11 (EPA Reg. No. 67979

- 1), DAS

- 59122

- 7 ( EPA Reg

. No. 68467

- 5 ), MIR162 ( EPA

Reg

. No. 67979

- 14 ), MIR604 (EPA Reg. No. 67979

- 5), TC1507 ( EPA Reg

. No. 68467

-

2 ), and other transgenic lines of corn not regulated by EPA (e.g.

, herbicide tolerant lines ).

Syngenta Seeds, Inc.

- NAFTA has used conventional breeding techniques to develop the

single

- and combined

- trait corn products described above as PIP test materials (Section

G.2. Acreage, Seed and Active Ingredient Quantities by State or Territory ). T he PIP test

materials protect corn from insect feeding damage

. Each biotechnology

- derived trait

contributes specific insecticidal benefits to the final combined

- trait product. Event Bt11

produces a European corn borer ( Ostrinia nubilalis ) insecticidal Cr y1Ab protein derived

from Bacillus thuringiensis. DAS

- 59122

- 7 produces the Bacillus thuringiensis strain

PS149B1 Cry34Ab1 and Cry35Ab1 proteins that protect s against feeding damage caused

by coleopteran pests such as corn rootworm s

. MIR162 produces the Bacillus

thuringiensis Vip3Aa20 insecticidal protein that protects against feeding damage caused

by many lepidopteran insect pests: Spodoptera frugiperda (fall armyworm), Pseudaletia

unipunctata (armyworm), Spodoptera exigua (beet armyworm), Helicoverpa ze a (corn

earworm / cotton bollworm), Agrotis ipsilon (black cutworm), and Striacosta albicosta

(western bean cutworm). MIR604 produces a modified Bacillus thuringiensis m Cry3Aa2

protein that protect s against feeding damage caused corn rootworm s . TC1507 pr oduces

the Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1F protein that protects against feeding damage caused by

European corn borer ( Ostrinia nubilalis ) and other lepidopteran insect s

.

Target Pests:

Spodoptera frugiperda (fall armyworm)

Psuedaletia unipunctata (armyworm )

Spodoptera exigua (beet armyworm)

Helicoverpa zea (corn earworm, cotton bollworm)

Agrotis ipsilon (black cutworm)

Striacosta albicosta (western bean cutworm)

Ostrinia nubilalis (European corn borer)

Diatraea saccharalis (sugar cane borer)

Pepaipema nebri s (common stalk borer)

Diatraea grandiosella (southwestern corn borer)

Diatraea crambidoides ( southern cornstalk borer)

Diabrotica virgifera virgifera (western corn rootworm)

Diabrotica barberi (northern corn rootworm)

### Syngenta 5307

- EPA

- 7 Page 338 of 590 

## Diabrotica virgifera zeae (Mexican co rn rootworm)

Diabrotica undecimpunctata howardi (Southern corn rootworm)

Other minor agronomic pests

Geographic Areas:

28 states and Puerto Rico, representing diverse agronomic zones

Sites:

Research stations, seed production fields, privately owned far ms, and university farms.

Period of Use:

March 1, 2010 to February 28, 2012

Protocols for Field Experimentation:

Research planned under the experimental program will be conducted under the following

two protocols:

Protocol # 1

– Efficacy evaluation

Pr otocol # 2

– Regulatory studies

### Syngenta 5307

- EPA

- 7 Page 339 of 590 

## G.3. a

. Protocol # 1 : Efficacy Evaluation

Objectives

**•** Produce PIP inbred lines and hybrids suitable for efficacy evaluation

.

**•** Determine the insecticidal spectrum of activity for Event 5307 corn under diverse

environmental conditions in a representative range of genetic backgrounds

.

**•** Determine the insecticidal spectrum of activity in breeding stack combinations of

the PIPs Bt11, DAS

- 59122

- 7

, MIR162

, MIR604

, TC1507 and Event 5307 corn

under diverse environmental conditions in a re presentative range of genetic

backgrounds

.

**•** Evaluate insecticidal efficacy of Event 5307 and PIP breeding stacks under

diverse environmental conditions and in a representative range of genetic

backgrounds.

**•** Evaluate effects of chemical seed treatments, in co mbination with PIP corn, on

corn rootworm s and other ground dwelling insect pests.

Description

Conversion of existing inbred lines to lines containing the 5307 PIP will take place using

conventional breeding techniques. An inbred containing 5307, the do nor parent, will be

crossed to a recipient inbred line, the recurrent parent

. The donor parent may contain

other registered PIPs (e.g. MIR604 or TC1507). Backcrossing of the progeny to the

recurrent parent will be conducted over multiple (4

- 7) generation s. At any time during

this process, a partially or fully converted inbred line may be used as a donor for

additional inbred lines. After obtaining the desired phenotype and/or genotype, repetitive

generations of self

- pollination will be conducted to fix the trans genes in a homozygous

state and to produce enough seed for subsequent uses. Converted inbred lines will then

be crossed to tester inbred lines to produce new hybrids for evaluation. The conversion

and testing of a single inbred line typically re quires planting more than 500 rows over the

course of line development. Plant tissues will be sampled in order to conduct various

types of laboratory analyses to determine phenotype and/or genotype (marker assisted

breeding)

.

Test crosses of converted i nbred lines containing Event 5307 and other PIPS that may

also have been in the donor parent and maintained during backcrossing will be made via

hand pollinations to other inbred lines to produce hybrids suitable for efficacy

evaluations

. Crosses of conve rted inbreds to other lines containing registered PIPs (e.g.

Bt11, MIR162, MIR604, TC1507, or DAS

- 59122

- 7) will be made to produce combined

trait hybrids suitable for efficacy evaluations.

Converted inbred lines and test hybrids will be evaluated for bo th trait and agronomic

performance. Evaluation for trait performance will be carried out under standard

protocols for evaluating field insecticidal efficacy. These trials will generally be

### Syngenta 5307

- EPA

- 7 Page 340 of 590 

## performed in replicated small plots, in field strip plots, or in large blocks. Comparisons of

insect feeding damage will frequently be made to untreated c onventional corn

, conventional corn treated with conventional insecticide s or other PIP varieties. Natural

or artificial infestations of target insects will be employ ed. Leaf, stalk, ear, and/or root

damage may be evaluated using standardized rating systems. Insecticidal efficacy will

also be indirectly assessed by in

- field observations of target pest frequency or by

qualitative or quantitative assessment of plant agronomic performa nce and health.

The target pests for Event 5307 and PIP breeding stacks that are part of this experimental

program are found over a wide geography. Some pests are only found in very limited

geographies (e.g.

, southern corn rootworms). Therefore, trial s will be conducted at

multiple locations over a wide geography under diverse environmental conditions that

collectively comprise the corn growing regions of the U.S.

Control of weeds and other pests in the trials will be managed by conventional

h erbici de s , insecticide s , and fungicides. Pesticide applications, as well as fertilizer use,

will be according to local growing practices.

Schedule

For the continental U.S., planting of trials will take place between February and June.

Observations and harves ting will occur from planting through August to November. For

Hawaii and Puerto Rico, there will be multiple plantings that occur throughout the year.

Harvest Procedures

Test plots will be harvested by hand or mechanically. Ears harvested by hand will be

placed in containers of suitable construction such that loss of seed outside the container is

prevented. Ears harvested by machine will be shelled as part of the process and remnant

seed/grain disposed of as per the gene containment guidelines describe d below (G.3.f.

Containment Procedures). Harvest machinery will be thoroughly cleaned prior to exiting

the test plot area.

### Syngenta 5307

- EPA

- 7 Page 341 of 590 

## G.3. b Protocol # 2 : Regulatory S tudies

Objectives

**•** Produce PIP inbred lines and hybrids suitable for regulatory and benefits stu dies

.

**•** Collect plant tissue samples from PIP hybrids for use in regulatory

characterization studies , including studies to quantify insecticidal protein levels

.

**•** Conduct insect resistance management field trials.

**•** Gather field ecological data for potential use in an environmental risk assessment.

**•** Produce grain or other plant tissues (e.g.

, pollen) for use in animal feeding

studies.

**•** Conduct yield trials, both small plot and field level, for purposes of evaluating

product benefits.

Description

Conversion of e xisting inbred lines to lines containing the 5307 PIP will take place using

conventional breeding techniques. An inbred containing 5307, the donor parent, will be

crossed to a recipient inbred line, the recurrent parent

. The donor parent may contain

othe r registered PIPs (e.g. MIR604 or TC1507). Backcrossing of the progeny to the

recurrent parent will be conducted over multiple (4

- 7) generations. At any time during

this process, a partially or fully converted inbred line may be used as a donor for

addit ional inbred lines. After obtaining the desired phenotype and/or genotype, repetitive

generations of self

- pollination will be conducted to fix the genes in a homozygous state

and to produce enough self

- pollinated seed for subsequent uses. Converted inbre d lines

will t hen be crossed to tester inbred lines to produce new hybrids for evaluation. The

conversion and testing of a single inbred line typically requires planting more than 500

rows over the course of line development. Plant tissues will be sample d to conduct

various types of laboratory analyses to determine phenotype and/or genotype (marker

assisted breeding)

Test crosses of converted inbred lines containing Event 5307 and other PIPS that may

also have been in the donor parent and maintained dur ing backcrossing will be made via

hand pollinations to other inbred lines to produce hybrids suitable for efficacy and other

evaluations

. Crosses of converted inbred lines to other lines containing registered PIPs

(e.g. Bt11, MIR162, MIR604, TC1507, or DA S

- 59122

- 7) will be made to produce

combined trait hybrids suitable for regulatory studies and yield trials

. Converted inbred

lines and test hybrids will be evaluated for yield potential and used in multiple regulatory

studies.

Yield trials will be cond ucted at multiple locations over a wide geography under diverse

environmental conditions that collectively comprise the corn growing regions of the U.S.

Yield will be assessed in multiple varieties under standard agronomic testing protocols.

Comparative yield data will be used to estimate PIP benefits as part of a risk

- benefit

analysis as typically required for any conditionally registered pesticide.

### Syngenta 5307

- EPA

- 7 Page 342 of 590 

## The small replicated plots planted at multiple locations will be used to produce plant

tissues for regul atory characterization studies (e.g. quantification of PIP insecticidal

proteins). PIP seed will be planted in large blocks to produce grain and/or forage for use

in animal feeding studies.

Control of weeds and other pests in the trials will be managed b y conventional

h erbicide s , insecticide s , and fungicides. Pesticide applications, as well as fertilizer use,

will be according to local growing practices.

Schedule

For the continental U.S., planting of trials will take place between February and June.

F or Hawaii and Puerto Rico, there will be multiple plantings that occur throughout the

year.

Harvest Procedures

Test plots will be harvested by hand or mechanically. Ears harvested by hand will be

placed in containers of suitable construction such that l oss of seed outside the container is

prevented. Ears harvested by machine will be shelled as part of the process and remnant

seed/grain disposed of as per the gene containment guidelines described below (G.3.f.

Containment Procedures). Harvest machinery will be thoroughly cleaned prior to exiting

the test plot area.

### Syngenta 5307

- EPA

- 7 Page 343 of 590 

## G.3. c

. Containment Procedures

The storage area used for test seed shall be a fully enclosed space (e.g. filing cabinet,

office, closet). The storage area shall be m anaged so as to prevent unintended release of

the regulated article into the environment. Access doors shall be lockable. Windows shall

be closed and locked. The storage area shall be used exclusively for regulated articles and

labeled accordingly. All tes t seed bags will be color coded, marked, tagged, or otherwise

distinguished to allow immediate recognition. Storage of Test Seed

The risk of inadvertent release of the regulated materials during transport will be

minimized by employing the following procedure s: Transportation

Shipment of small quantities (< 50 lb):

• The seed material shall be secured within a primary container. The container shall

be a plastic bag of no less than 5 mil thickness or a sealed envelope or package

constructed of tear

- and moisture

- resistan t material.

• The primary container shall be placed within a sealed, leak

- proof (in terms of seed)

secondary container that shall be contained within a sealed, leaf

- proof (in terms of

seed) tertiary container. The secondary container shall be resistant to breakage or

water damage and shall be constructed of materials such as shrink

- wrap plastic,

corrugated fiberboard, corrugated cardboard, wood, or other material of

equivalent strength; the secondary container shall be placed in a tertiary container.

The tertiary container shall be resistant to breakage or water damage and shall be

constructed of corrugated fiberboard, corrugated cardboard, wood, or other

material of equivalent strength.

• Primary, secondary, and tertiary containers used to transport re gulated seed shall

be sanitized prior to filling and after the seed has been removed.

• USDA notifi cation and EUP numbers must be displayed on the outermost

shipping containers.

Shipment of large quantities (> 50 lbs):

• The regulated seed material s hall be secured within a primary container. The

primary container shall be a plastic bag of no les than 5 mil thickness or an

alternative that is tear

- and moisture

- resistant and of equivalent strength.

• The sealed primary container shall be placed with in a sealed, leaf

- proof secondary

container. The secondary container shall be resistant to breakage or water damage

and shall be constructed of metal, heavy plastic, or material of equivalent

strength.

• Regulated seed or propagable plant material shall not be transported in containers

that are not secure or enclosed.

• Containers used to transport the seed material shall be cleaned prior to filling and

after seed is removed.

• USDA notification and EUP numbers must be displayed on the outermost

### Syngenta 5307

- EPA

- 7 Page 344 of 590 

## ship ping containers. EUP pesticide labels shall be placed on the primary

containers.

Shipment of extra large quantities (> 10,000 lbs)

• The shipment of regulated shelled seed or grain material shall be in a secured

primary container. The primary container shall be placed in a fully enclosed or

securely covered transport trailer.

• Shipment of harvested ears may occur in leak proof (in terms of regulated

material) grain haulers tightly covered with a sturdy tarp.

• Regulated seed or propagable plant mat erial shall not be transported in containers

that are not secure, covered, or enclosed.

• Containers used to transport the seed material shall be cleaned prior to filling and

after seed is removed.

• USDA notification and EUP numbers must be displayed on the outermost

shipping containers. EUP pesticide labels shall be placed on the primary

containers.

The possibility of pollen

- mediated gene flow outside of the trial area will be minimized

by one or more of the following practices: Gene Containment

• Spatial isolation: A distance of at least 660 feet must separate the regulated

transgenic corn from any sexually compatible corn that is not part of this research

program; open pollinated ears of any nonresearch corn within 660 feet of

transgenic plants must be destroyed. Regulated plots may be located within 660

feet of conventional corn in a breeding nursery, provided the ear shoots of the

conventional corn are covered for the period during which the silks are viable.

• Temporal isolation (allowed in HI and PR only): The 660 feet isolation may be

waived if there is assurance that there are no receptive silks on conventional corn

that has the potential of entering the food and feed supply chain during the time of

pollen shed from the regulated transgen ic corn.

• Detass e ling : Removal of all tassels from regulated corn plants prior to anthesis.

• Early Crop Destruct: Regulated field trials shall be reproductively isolated from

other sexually compatible species that are not part of the trial by destro ying the

regulated plants on the trial site prior to anthesis

.

All experimental plots will be uniquely identified and under the control of the Cooperator

and/or Participant. Identification

• The identity of the regulated transgenic material must be mai ntained by planting in

distinct plots.

• All machinery that may retain regulated transgenic corn seed or grain must be

cleaned after use.

• Complete records must be kept of material received, planted, harvested, shipped and

destroyed.

### Syngenta 5307

- EPA

- 7 Page 345 of 590 

## Disposition of plant materials at conclusion of a trial will be in accordance with the

provisions of section G.7. Trial sites must be managed for volunteer plants to prevent

persistence of Event 5307 corn in the environment. Tr ial sites will be monitored for one

year after harvest. Any volunteer plants found must be destroyed using an appropriate

herbicide or by mechanical means before reaching their reproductive stage. The need for

volunteer monitoring of fields will cease on ce Event 5307 corn is declared nonregulated

by USDA. Post

- Planting and Post

- Harvest Containment

G.4

. Objectives of the Proposed Program

Corn i s grown in varying quantities i n every state of the U.S. and Puerto Rico. The

contiguous lower 48 states are divided into seven maturity zones linked to latitude and

climate. Over decades of successful breeding, corn varieties have been adapted for

optimal performance in each of these maturity zones. These breeding efforts have

resulted in the development of varieties that reach maturity in the cooler climates and

shorter growing seasons of northern states and the warmer climates and longer growing

seasons of southern states. A large percentage of these varieties contain one or more

registered PIP genes ( i ncluding Bt11, MIR162 and MIR604 ).

Syngenta Seeds has developed and maintains a portfolio of corn varieties comprised of

thousands of inbred and hybrid lines. Event 5307 will be offered in many of these

varieties as will breeding stacks of the other PIP events included in this application.

Evalua ting the performance of the insecticidal trait(s) in a representative number of these

varieties is an important objective of the experimental program. Morphologic and growth

characteristics of different plant varieties, as well as environmental factors, c an influence

susceptibility of a plant to insect feeding damage. These factors need to be considered in

the trait efficacy evaluation program. A large number of locations are needed to

encompass the wide range of environmental conditions under which the insecticidal trait

is expected to perform.

A second objective of this experimental program is to conduct regulatory and product

benefit studie s to support registration of the PIP under section 3 of the Act.

### Syngenta 5307

- EPA

- 7 Page 346 of 590 

## G.5

. Program Quantities

Achieving the objectives of this experimental program require planting of PIP corn on a

maximum of 3830 acres and planting of non

- PIP corn on up to 3481 acres in 2010

. A

maximum of 3828 acres of PIP corn and up to 348 0 acres non

- PIP corn are needed for

planting in 20 1 1

. See Section G.2 for an accounting of acres by test entry, state, and

protocol.

Th e requested acreage is ne eded to adequately test these corn traits under a wide range of

environmental conditions, in diverse germplasm, under different levels of insec t pressure,

and to meet the extensive program objectives. Tables 70 and 71 summarize the

maximum seed quantities and amounts of PIP active ingredients that will be deployed in

this experimental program. Additionally, Table 72 p rovides the total acreage fo r each PIP

test material. Table 73 provides additional information regarding the use of the non

- PIP

corn acres. The highest EUP acreage requested for any unregistered PIP in this program

is 218

. The acreage requested for each individual PIP event and PI P breeding stack is

relatively limited.

G.6

. Proposed Duration of Program

March 1, 2010 to February 28, 2012

### Syngenta 5307

- EPA

- 7 Page 347 of 590 

## Table 72

. Estimated acreage utilization by PIP test material

2010 2011

PIP Non

PIP PIP Non

PIP

Bt11 128 114 128 114

DAS

- 59122

- 7 10 3 96 103 96

MIR162 108 97 108 97

MIR604 109 101 109 101

TC1507 125 110 125 110

5307 140 126 139 126

Bt11 x MIR162 157 126 157 126

Bt11 x MIR604 124 114 124 114

Bt11 x TC1507 122 113 122 113

Bt11 x 5307 116 107 116 107

DAS

- 59122

- 7 x MIR604 86 83 86 83

DAS

- 59122

- 7 x TC1507 92 81 92 81

DAS

- 59122

- 7 x 5307 81 77 81 77

MIR162 x TC1507 138 118 138 118

MIR604 x 5307 124 114 124 114

MIR604x TC1507 138 118 137 117

Bt11 x DAS

- 59122

- 7 x TC1507 138 118 138 118

Bt11 x MIR162 x MIR604 106 89 106 89

Bt11 x MIR162 x TC1507 129 121 129 121

Bt11 x MIR604 x TC1507 127 118 127 118

Bt11 x MIR604 x 5307 124 115 124 115

DAS59122 x MIR604 x TC1507 148 134 148 134

MIR604 x TC1507 x 5307 218 181 218 181

MIR162 x TC1507x 5307 58 58 58 58

Bt11 x DAS

- 59122

- 7 x MIR 162 x TC1507 58 58 58 58

Bt11 x DAS

- 59122

- 7 x MIR604 x TC1507 137 128 137 128

Bt11 x MIR162 x MIR604 x TC1507 79 79 79 79

Bt11 x MIR162 x MIR604 x 5307 79 79 79 79

Bt11 x MIR604 x TC1507 x 5307 118 108 118 108

MIR162 x MIR604 x TC1507 x 5307 58 58 58 58

Bt11 x DAS

- 59122

- 7 x MIR162 x MIR604 x TC1507 124 120 124 120

Bt11 x MIR162 x MIR604 x TC1507 x 5307 122 114 122 114

Bt11 x DAS

- 59122

- 7 x MIR162 x MIR604 x TC1507 x 5307 116 108 116 108

Total 3830 3481 3828 3480

### Syngenta 5307

- EPA

- 7 Page 348 of 590 

## Table 73. A dditional informati on regarding the use of the non

- PIP corn acres by

State

.

State 

### PIP Further details on Non

PIP acres

State 

### PIP Further details on Non

PIP acres

Non

PIP Border Total

Non

PIP Non

PIP Border Total

Non

- PIP

AR 

### 66 36 30 66 AR 

### 66 36 30 66

CA 

### 66 36 30 66 CA 

### 66 36 30 66

CO 

### 66 32 34 66 CO 

### 67 32 35 67

FL 

### 68 32 35 67 FL 

### 68 32 35 67

GA 

### 67 36 30 66 GA 

### 67 36 30 66

HI 

### 327 121 130 251 HI 

### 324 118 130 248

IA 

### 417 180 187 367 IA 

### 418 180 189 369

ID 

### 66 36 30 66 ID 

### 66 36 30 66

IL 

### 441 180 208 388 IL 

### 441 180 209 389

IN 

### 99 46 50 96 IN 

### 99 45 50 95

KS 

### 92 46 40 86 KS 

### 92 45 40 85

KY 

### 113 45 50 95 KY 

### 113 45 50 95

LA 

### 66 36 30 66 LA 

### 66 36 30 66

MD 

### 66 36 30 66 MD 

### 66 36 30 66

MI 

### 66 36 30 66 MI 

### 66 36 30 66

MN 

### 264 104 120 224 MN 

### 263 103 120 223

MO 

### 138 60 78 138 MO 

### 139 60 7 9 139

MS 

### 66 36 30 66 MS 

### 66 36 30 66

NC 

### 71 35 36 71 NC 

### 72 36 36 72

NE 

### 353 155 161 316 NE 

### 353 155 160 315

NY 

### 66 36 30 66 NY 

### 66 36 30 66

OH 

### 77 38 37 75 OH 

### 77 38 37 75

OK 

### 66 36 30 66 OK 

### 66 36 30 66

PR 

### 286 103 121 224 PR 

### 281 100 121 221

SC 

### 66 36 30 66 S C 

### 66 36 30 66

SD 

### 80 44 35 79 SD 

### 81 45 35 80

TX 

### 73 44 30 74 TX 

### 74 45 30 75

WA 

### 66 36 30 66 WA 

### 66 36 30 66

WI 

### 72 36 36 72 WI 

### 73 36 37 73

2010

Totals 

### 3830 1733 1748 3481 2011

Totals 

### 3828 1727 1753 3480

### Syngenta 5307

- EPA

- 7 Page 349 of 590 

## G.7

. Method of Disposition of Plant Materials

Disposition of plant materials at the conclusion of the testing program will be as follows.

Unused planting seed may be used for:

• further research trials;

• returned to a secure on

- site storage location;

• returned to Syngenta or seed company partner s/affiliates;

• destroyed by incineration, autoclaving, or burial in the test field.

Seed, grain, and other plant materials may be harvested for further research or returned to

Syngenta or its seed partners. Harvested grain and other plant material may b e used for:

• further research trials;

• future planting seed;

• experimental animal feeding studies.

Additionally, u nused planting seed and harvested grain and other plant material from

Bt11, MIR162, MIR604, Bt11 x MIR162; Bt11 x MIR604 and Bt11 x M IR 162 x

MIR604 may be used for food or feed. T he noted single event corn and combined trait

corn have previously been granted a tolerance exemption and are deregulated.

After h arvest or completion of data collection, all corn plants in the trial will be

destroyed. Standard methods for the area will be employed and conducted in compliance

with local plow down regulations. Waste plant materials may be plowed under or

otherwise dev italized.

### Syngenta 5307

- EPA

- 7 Page 350 of 590 

## Appendix I: Additional Copies of the Proposed Labels