alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# LI2019316EN.01000301.xml

| 6.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | LI 316/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

LI 316/3

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2019/787 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on the definition, description, presentation and labelling of spirit drinks, the use of the names of spirit drinks in the presentation and labelling of other foodstuffs, the protection of geographical indications for spirit drinks, the use of ethyl alcohol and distillates of agricultural origin in alcoholic beverages, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 110/2008

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 130 of 17 May 2019
  )

On page 30, Article 51(2):

for:

‘2.   Nothwithstanding paragraph 1, Article 16, point (c) of Article 20, Articles 21, 22 and 23, Article 24(1), (2) and (3), the first and second subparagraphs of Article 24(4), Article 24(8) and (9), Articles 25 to 42, Articles 46 and 47, Article 50(1), (4) and (6), points 39(d) and 40(d) of Annex I and the definitions set out in Article 3 relating to those provisions shall apply from 8 June 2019.’,

read:

‘2.   Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Article 14(2), Article 16, point (c) of Article 20, Articles 21, 22 and 23, Article 24(1), (2) and (3), the first and second subparagraphs of Article 24(4), Article 24(8) and (9), Articles 25 to 42, Articles 46 and 47, Article 50(1), (4) and (6), points 39(d) and 40(d) of Annex I and the definitions set out in Article 3 relating to those provisions shall apply from 8 June 2019.’.

On page 32, Annex I, point 4 ‘Wine spirit’, point (a)(i):

for:

| ‘(i) | it is produced exclusively by the distillation at less than 86 % vol. of wine, wine fortified for distillation or wine distillate distilled at less than 86 % vol.;’, |
| --- | --- |

‘(i)

it is produced exclusively by the distillation at less than 86 % vol. of wine, wine fortified for distillation or wine distillate distilled at less than 86 % vol.;’,

read:

| ‘(i) | it is produced exclusively by the distillation at less than 86 % vol. of wine, wine fortified for distillation or wine distillate;’. |
| --- | --- |

‘(i)

it is produced exclusively by the distillation at less than 86 % vol. of wine, wine fortified for distillation or wine distillate;’.

---
Opinion issued April 5, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-22-00136-CR

NO. 01-22-00137-CR

NO. 01-22-00138-CR

NO. 01-22-00139-CR

NO. 01-22-00140-CR

———————————

IN RE CASEY RAY BROWN, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

MEMORANDUM OPINION
2

Casey Ray Brown, acting pro se, has filed an original petition for writ of 

habeas corpus seeking bail reduction in the underlying cases.

1 We dismiss the 

petition for want of jurisdiction.

In criminal matters, this Court’s habeas corpus jurisdiction is appellate only, 

and we do not have original habeas corpus jurisdiction. See TEX. GOV’T CODE § 

22.221(d); Ex parte Denby, 627 S.W.2d 435, 435 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 

1981, orig. proceeding); see also Chavez v. State, 132 S.W.3d 509, 510 (Tex. App.—

Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, no pet.) (citing TEX. GOV’T CODE § 22.221) (“A court of 

appeals does not have original habeas corpus jurisdiction in felony cases.”). Original 

jurisdiction to grant a writ of habeas corpus in a criminal case is vested in the Texas 

Court of Criminal Appeals, the district courts, the county courts, or a judge in those 

courts. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11; Ex parte Hawkins, 885 S.W.2d 586, 588 

(Tex. App.—El Paso 1994, orig. proceeding). We thus lack jurisdiction over this 

attempt to seek habeas relief directly from this Court. See, e.g., In re Buchanan, No. 

01-19-00378-CR, 2019 WL 3127092, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] July 

16, 2019, orig. proceeding) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (dismissing 

1 No record was filed with the petition. The underlying cases are The State of Texas 

v. Casey Ray Brown, cause numbers 1706825, 1711705, 1711718, 1714981, and 

1714982, pending in the 208th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the 

Honorable Greg Glass presiding.
3

petition for writ of habeas corpus because court lacks original habeas corpus 

jurisdiction in criminal cases).

Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for writ of habeas corpus for want of 

jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Landau, Hightower, and Rivas-Molloy.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Krupp Government Income Trust (the
"Trust") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alan
Reese, Chief Accounting Officer of the Trust, certify, pursuant to U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Trust as of June 30, 2003 (the last date of the period
            covered by the Report).


/s/ Alan Reese
------------------------
Alan Reese
Chief Accounting Officer
August 6, 2003


                                      -18-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           5,472
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  220,069
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     39,983
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               265,524
<PP&E>                                         990,653
<DEPRECIATION>                               (297,628)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,038,541
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          275,449
<BONDS>                                        369,333
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            3,218
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           416
<OTHER-SE>                                     351,309
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,038,541
<SALES>                                      1,381,366
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,369,522
<CGS>                                        1,257,453
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,257,453
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               110,176
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,118
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (23,225)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,450
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (14,775)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,107)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,882)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.74)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.74)


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Fiscal Service

# AGENCY:

Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This is Supplement No. 2 to the Treasury Department Circular 570, 2009 Revision, published July 1, 2009, at 74 FR 31536.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6850

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A Certificate of Authority as an acceptable surety on Federal bonds is hereby issued under 31 U.S.C. 9305 to the following company:

National Trust Insurance Company (NAIC #20141). Business Address: 6300 University Parkway, Sarasota, FL 34240. Phone: (800) 226-3224. Underwriting Limitation b/: $3,108,000. Surety Licenses C/: AZ, FL, GA, IL, IN, IA, KY, MD, MI, MS, MO, NE, NC, OK, SC, TN. Incorporated in: Tennessee.

Federal bond-approving officers should annotate their reference copies of the Treasury Circular 570 (“Circular”), 2009 Revision, to reflect this addition.

Certificates of Authority expire on June each year, unless revoked prior to that date. The Certificates are subject to subsequent annual renewal as long as the companies remain qualified (31 CFR part 223). A list of qualified companies is published annually as of July 1st in the Circular, which outlines details as to the underwriting limitations, areas in which companies are licensed to transact surety business, and other information.

                    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet at                     *http://www.fms.treas.gov/​c57O*.                

Questions concerning this Notice may be directed to the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial Accounting and Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West Highway, Room 6F01, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

Dated: August 6, 2009.

Kevin L. Mcintyre,

Acting Director, Financial Accounting and Services Division.

[FR Doc. E9-19685 Filed 8-17-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Demaine Jackson, Appellant.

[803 NYS2d 471]

Appeal from an amended sentence of the Genesee County Court (Robert C. Noonan, J.), rendered June 25, 2002. The amended sentence ordered defendant to pay restitution.

It is hereby ordered that the amended sentence so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Contrary to defendant’s contention, it was not necessary for County Court, “in ordering restitution in addition to imprisonment, to consider defendant’s ability to pay” *(People v Emmi,*254 AD2d 840, 840 [1998], *lv denied*92 NY2d 949 [1998]; *see People v Holmes,*300 AD2d 1072, 1073 [2002]; *People v Weinberg,*213 AD2d 506, 507 [1995], *lv denied*88 NY2d 970 [1996]; *see generally*Penal Law § 60.27 [1]). Defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for our review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]) and, in any event, would not require vacatur of the restitution order under the circumstances of this case. Defendant expressly stated that he would not challenge the amount of restitution recommended by the Hearing Officer and imposed by the court *(see generally People v Horne,*97 NY2d 404, 414 n 3 [2002]; *People v Callahan,*80 NY2d 273, 280-281 [1992]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Kehoe, Martoche and Pine, JJ.
#### § 1026.310 Reports of transactions in currency.

The reports of transactions in currency requirements for futures commission merchants and introducing brokers in commodities are located in subpart C of part 1010 of this chapter and this subpart
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,525
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          24,385
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     16,509
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          16,290
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           148,847
<LOANS>                                        222,630
<ALLOWANCE>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 438,742
<DEPOSITS>                                     260,238
<SHORT-TERM>                                    19,200
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             22,918
<LONG-TERM>                                    110,421
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,252
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,713
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  25,965
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  4,394
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,581
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   108
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 7,083
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,551
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,162
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,921
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       75
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 249
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,594
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    939
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       711
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .33
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.13
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,859
<LOANS-PAST>                                         9
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    67
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,755
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       48
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,782
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,070
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            712
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Bruce Madonna et al., Appellants, v Town of Riverhead et al., Respondents.

[806 NYS2d 75]

In a hybrid proceeding, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Town Board of the Town of Riverhead dated August 20, 2002, reaffirming an earlier acceptance of a road known as Centre Street, as a Town highway, and an action for a judgment declaring, among other things, that the Town of Riverhead had no right, title, or interest in the subject road, the petitioners separately appeal, as limited by their briefs, from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Lifson, J.), entered August 6, 2003, as, in effect, granted the respondents’ motion to dismiss the petition pursuant to, among other things, CPLR 217, 3211 (a) (5), (7); 7804 (f), and dismissed the hybrid proceeding.

Ordered that the order and judgment is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR 7804 (h).

The petitioners own neighboring parcels of land in the Town of Riverhead. Part of the subject road, Centre Street, cuts between the petitioners’ parcels. Both petitioners claim that their respective property lines extend to the centerline of Centre Street. The respondents contend that the petitioners’ fee rights extend only to the edges of Centre Street which bound their respective parcels, not to its centerline. The petitioners challenge, inter alia, the respondents’ contention regarding their fee rights.

There are triable issues of fact relating to the asserted dedication of the disputed part of Centre Street and the alleged acquisition by the Town of prescriptive rights in the subject *389road by public use *(see generally*CPLR 7804 [h]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court should not have dismissed the petition without holding an evidentiary hearing *(see*CPLR 7804 [h]; *Matter of Archer v Town of Wheatfield,*300 AD2d 1108 [2002]; *Goldrich v Franklin Gardens Corp.,*282 App Div 698, 699 [1953]).

The respondents’ remaining contentions are without merit. H. Miller, J.P., Santucci, Goldstein and Dillon, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 155 Introduced in House (IH)]

  2d Session
H. J. RES. 155

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1996, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 1996

 Ms. Jackson-Lee introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1996, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FURTHER CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS.

    (a) Extension of Period.--Section 106(c) of Public Law 104-56 is 
amended by striking ``December 15, 1995'' and inserting ``January 19, 
1996''.
    (b) Modification in Rate of Operations Reduction Applicable to 
Certain Programs.--Section 111 of Public Law 104-56 is amended in the 
last sentence by striking ``25 percent'' and inserting ``10 percent''.

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF LAPSE IN APPROPRIATIONS.

    (a) Compensation of Furloughed Personnel.--Any officer or employee 
of the United States Government or of the District of Columbia 
government who was furloughed for any period as a result of a lapse in 
appropriations occurring after December 15, 1995, and before the 
enactment of this joint resolution, shall be compensated at the 
standard rate of compensation for such officer or employee for such 
period.
    (b) Ratification of Obligations.--All obligations that were 
incurred in anticipation of the appropriations made and authority 
granted by the enactment of this joint resolution, and that were for 
the purpose of maintaining the level of activity essential to protect 
life and property and to bring about the orderly termination of 
government functions, are hereby ratified and approved if otherwise in 
accord with the provisions of Public Law 104-56, as amended by this 
joint resolution.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 26 Introduced in House (IH)]

                                     

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 26

 Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States with 
                     respect to the right to life.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

Mr. Dornan (for himself, Mr. Hancock, Mr. Burton of Indiana, Mr. Smith 
of New Jersey, Mr. Hyde, and Mrs. Vucanovich) introduced the following 
 joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States with 
                     respect to the right to life.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The right to life is the paramount and most 
fundamental right of a person.
    ``Section 2. With respect to the right to life guaranteed to 
persons by the fifth and fourteenth articles of amendment to the 
Constitution, the word `person' applies to all human beings, 
irrespective of age, health, function, or condition of dependency, 
including their unborn offspring at every stage of their biological 
development including fertilization.
    ``Section 3. No unborn person shall be deprived of life by any 
person: Provided, however, That nothing in this article shall prohibit 
a law allowing justification to be shown for only those medical 
procedures required to prevent the death of either the pregnant woman 
or her unborn offspring, as long as such law requires every reasonable 
effort be made to preserve the life of each.
    ``Section 4. The Congress and the several States shall have power 
to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.''.
                                 <all>
```