alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2019084EN.01000101.xml

| 26.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 84/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 84/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2019/486

of 19 March 2019

entering the name ‘Schaf-Heumilch’/‘Sheep's Haymilk’/‘Latte fieno di pecora’/‘Lait de foin de brebis’/‘Leche de heno de oveja’ (TSG) in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Austria's application to register the name ‘Schaf-Heumilch’/‘Sheep's Haymilk’/‘Latte fieno di pecora’/‘Lait de foin de brebis’/‘Leche de heno de oveja’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Austria's application to register the name ‘Schaf-Heumilch’/‘Sheep's Haymilk’/‘Latte fieno di pecora’/‘Lait de foin de brebis’/‘Leche de heno de oveja’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Schaf-Heumilch’/‘Sheep's Haymilk’/‘Latte fieno di pecora’/‘Lait de foin de brebis’/‘Leche de heno de oveja’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Schaf-Heumilch’/‘Sheep's Haymilk’/‘Latte fieno di pecora’/‘Lait de foin de brebis’/‘Leche de heno de oveja’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Schaf-Heumilch’/‘Sheep's Haymilk’/‘Latte fieno di pecora’/‘Lait de foin de brebis’/‘Leche de heno de oveja’ (TSG) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.4. — Other products of animal origin (eggs, honey, various dairy products except butter, etc.), as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 March 2019.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 400, 6.11.2018, p. 3.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1027

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the provision which

includes unemployment compensation in income subject to tax.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 23, 1995

Mrs. KENNELLY (for herself, Mr. OLVER, Mr. RAHALL, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE

JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr.

TORRES, Mr. FROST, Mr. ANDREWS, Ms. LOFGREN, Mr. EVANS, Mr.

ACKERMAN, Ms. PELOSI, Mr. STUPAK, Mr. MARTINEZ, and Mr. SAXTON)

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on

Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal

the provision which includes unemployment compensation

in income subject to tax.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF TAXATION OF UNEMPLOYMENT

4 COMPENSATION.

5 (a) GENERAL RULE.—Section 85 of the Internal

6 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to unemployment com7 pensation) is hereby repealed.
2

•HR 1027 IH

1 (b) REPEAL OF REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.—Sec2 tion 6050B of such Code (relating to returns relating to

3 unemployment compensation) is hereby repealed.

4 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.—

5 (1) The table of sections for part II of sub6 chapter B of chapter 1 of such Code is amended by

7 striking the item relating to section 85.

8 (2) The table of sections for subpart B of part

9 III of subchapter A of chapter 61 of such Code is

10 amended by striking the item relating to section

11 6050B.

12 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

13 this section shall apply to payments received after Decem14 ber 31, 1994.

Æ
§ 1010.970 Exceptions, exemptions, and reports. ( a ) The Secretary, in his sole discretion, may by written order or authorization make exceptions to or grant exemptions from the requirements of this chapter. Such exceptions or exemptions may be conditional or unconditional, may apply to particular persons or to classes of persons, and may apply to particular transactions or classes of transactions. They shall, however, be applicable only as expressly Stated in the order of authorization, and they shall be revocable in the sole discretion of the Secretary.
( b ) The Secretary shall have authority to further define all terms used herein.
( c ) ( 1 ) The Secretary may, as an alternative to the reporting and recordkeeping requirements for casinos in §§ 1010.306(a), 1021.311, and 1021.410, grant exemptions to the casinos in any State whose regulatory system substantially meets the reporting and recordkeeping requirements of this chapter.
( 2 ) In order for a State regulatory system to qualify for an exemption on behalf of its casinos, the State must provide: ( i ) That the Treasury Department be allowed to evaluate the effectiveness of the State's regulatory system by periodic oversight review of that system;
( ii ) That the reports required under the State's regulatory system be submitted to the Treasury Department within 15 days of receipt by the State;
( iii ) That any records required to be maintained by the casinos relevant to any matter under this chapter and to which the State has access or maintains under its regulatory system be made available to the Treasury Department within 30 days of request;
( iv ) That the Treasury Department be provided with periodic status reports on the State's compliance efforts and findings;
( v ) That all but minor violations of the State requirements be reported to Treasury within 15 days of discovery; and
( vi ) That the State will initiate compliance examinations of specific institutions at the request of Treasury within a reasonable time, not to exceed 90 days where appropriate, and will provide reports of these examinations to Treasury within 15 days of completion or periodically during the course of the examination upon the request of the Secretary. If for any reason the State were not able to conduct an investigation within a reasonable time, the State will permit Treasury to conduct the investigation.
( 3 ) Revocation of any exemption under this subsection shall be in the sole discretion of the Secretary.
EXHIBIT 34.1





Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





To Management and the Board of Directors of The Huntington National Bank





We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that The Huntington National Bank (the “Bank”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the Consumer Automotive Receivables Platform (the “Platform”), as of December 31, 2016 and for the year then ended excluding criteria 1122(d)1(iii), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)3(i.D), 1122(d)4(ix), 1122(d)4(x), 1122(d)4(xi), 1122(d)4(xii), 1122(d)4(xiii), and 1122(d)4(xv), which the Bank has determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Appendix B to management's assertion identifies the individual asset-backed transactions and securities defined by management as constituting the Platform. Management is responsible for the Bank's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.





Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Bank’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Bank processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Bank during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Bank during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Bank’s compliance with the servicing criteria.





In our opinion, management’s assertion that The Huntington National Bank complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 for the Consumer Automotive Receivables Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.





/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP





Columbus, Ohio


March 16, 2017
IA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 82

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating

to the terms of office of Senators, Representatives, and the President

and Vice President.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 29, 1995

Mr. MASCARA introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States relating to the terms of office of Senators, Representatives, and the President and Vice President.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the follow4 ing article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitu5 tion of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents

6 and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by

7 the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States with8 in seven years after the date of its submission for ratifica9 tion:
2

•HJ 82 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE—

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. The term of office of a Representative

3 in Congress shall be four years.

4 ‘‘SECTION 2. No person who has been elected to the

5 Senate two times shall thereafter be eligible for election

6 or appointment to the Senate. No person who has been

7 elected to the House of Representatives a total of three

8 four-year terms, shall thereafter be eligible for election to

9 the House of Representatives.

10 ‘‘SECTION 3. For the purposes of determining eligi11 bility for election under section 2, service of more than

12 three years of a Senate term to which some other person

13 was elected, or service of more than two years of a House

14 term, shall count as an election.

15 ‘‘SECTION 4. No election or service occurring before

16 this article becomes operative shall be taken into account

17 when determining eligibility for election under this article.

18 ‘‘SECTION 5. The term of office of President and Vice

19 President shall be six years. No person who has been elect20 ed President or Vice President for a six-year term shall

21 thereafter be eligible for election to the office of President

22 or Vice President.
3

•HJ 82 IH

1 ‘‘SECTION 6. This article shall apply with respect to

2 terms of office beginning more than one year after the

3 date of the ratification of this article.’’.

Æ
Elizabeth A. Young, CSR, RPR



### Official Court Reporter

P. O. Box 747

Belton, Texas 76513

254 933-5268

August 13, 2015

Mr. Jeffrey D. Kyle

Clerk, Court of Appeals

P. O. Box 12547

Austin, Texas 78711-2547

tel 512 463-1733

fax 512 463-1685

In re: State vs John Lee Bowman

COA: 03-15-00263-CR TC # 73061

Attn: Chris Knowles

Dear Chris,

I am requesting an extension to complete this reporter's

record by September 15, 2015.

Sincerely,

/s/ Elizabeth A. Young

Elizabeth A. Young
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      15,377,100
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         106,688
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             6,500,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 39,474,364
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      21,839,269
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        21,880,356
<LOANS>                                    206,279,861
<ALLOWANCE>                                  3,437,489
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             300,456,068
<DEPOSITS>                                 271,850,769
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,725,211
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,019,740
<LONG-TERM>                                  1,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        32,082
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,828,266
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             300,456,068
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              9,132,947
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,746,044
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               366,462
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            11,245,453
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           5,051,211
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,125,202
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        6,120,251
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  300,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             229,550
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              4,468,272
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,228,659
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   2,228,659
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,334,541
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.47
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.49
<LOANS-NON>                                  4,970,325
<LOANS-PAST>                                   279,942
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                300,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             3,354,311
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  235,125
<RECOVERIES>                                    18,303
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            3,437,489
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         3,437,489
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Jose Guillermo RAMIREZ-ARCE, aka Jose Antonio Guillermo Ramirez-Arce, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 01-50281.

D.C. No. CR-00-03307-MLH.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted June 3, 2002.

Decided June 6, 2002.

*863Before O’SCANNLAIN, RYMER, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Jose Guillermo Ramirez-Arce (Ramirez) was indicted for drug-smuggling based in part on a confession that he allegedly gave to a Customs agent. The district court granted Ramirez’s motion to suppress the confession, because it found that the government had not carried its burden of proving that Ramirez had knowingly and voluntarily waived his *Miranda*rights. This is the government’s interlocutory appeal of the district court’s suppression order. We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3731, and we affirm.

At the suppression hearing, the district court heard sharply conflicting testimony as to whether Ramirez’s *Miranda*rights had been fully respected. The district court found that the government had not carried its burden of proving that Ramirez’s *Miranda*waiver had been knowing and voluntary. *See Colorado v.*Connelly, 479 U.S. 157, 167, 107 S.Ct. 515, 93 L.Ed.2d 473 (1986). In view of the conflicting testimony, this finding was not clearly erroneous. *See United States v. Andaverde,*64 F.3d 1305, 1313 (9th Cir.1995) (whether defendant’s *Miranda*waiver was knowing and intelligent is question of fact subject to dear-error review).

Contrary to the government’s main argument, nothing in the district court’s ruling suggests that it misunderstood the standard for a valid *Miranda*waiver.

The government waived any objection to the evidentiary hearing by failing to object in the district court.

AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 2012

- NM

- 002

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
DONGGUAN SUNRISE FUR NITURE CO., LTD., TAICANG FAIRMONT DESIGNS FURNITURE CO ., LTD., MEIZHOU SUNRIS E FURNITURE CO., LTD ., TAICANG SUNRISE WOOD INDUSTRY CO., LTD., Plaintiffs

- Appellants

LONGRANGE FURNITURE CO., LTD., LANGFANG TIANCHENG FURNITURE CO., LTD., Plaintiffs

COASTER COMPANY OF A MERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
UNITED STATES, AMERI CAN FURNITURE MANUFACTURERS COMMIT TEE FOR LEGAL TRADE, VAUGHAN

- BASSETT FURNITURE COMPANY, INC., Defendants

- Appellees

______________________
2015

- 1450

______________________ Appeals from the United States Court of International Trade in No s . 1:10

- cv

- 00254

- JAR, 1:10

- cv

- 00258

- JAR, 1:10

- cv

- 00285

- JAR, 1:10

- cv

- 00287

- JAR, Senior Judge Jane A. Restani.______________________
JUDGMENT

______________________
P ETER J. K OENIG , Squire Sanders (US) LLP, Washin gton, DC, for plaintiffs

- appellants Dongguan Sunrise Furniture Co., Ltd., Taicang Fairmont Designs Furniture Co., Ltd., Meizhou Sunrise Furniture Co., Ltd., Taicang Sunrise Wood Industry Co., Ltd.

K RISTIN H EIM M OWRY , Mowry & Grimson, PLLC, Washington, DC, for plaintif f- appellee Coaster Company of America. Also represented by J ILL A. C RAMER , J EFFREY S. G RIMSON , S ARAH M. W YSS

.
S TEPHEN C ARL T OSINI , Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for defendant

- appellee Un ited States. Also represented by B ENJAMIN C. M IZER , J EANNE E. D AVIDSON , P ATRICIA M. M C C ARTHY ; R EBECCA C ANTU , Office of the Chief Counsel for Import Administration, United States Department of Commerce, Washington, DC.

J AMES M ICHAEL T AYLOR , King & Spalding LLP, Was hington, DC, for defendants

- appellees American Furniture Manufact urers Committee for Legal Trade, Vaughan

Bassett Furniture Company, Inc. Also represented by D ANIEL S CHNEIDERMAN

.

______________________
T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :3

P ER C URIAM (L OURIE , M AYER , and O’M ALLEY , Circuit Judges ).
AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

October 12, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

*Cancellation:*                     The notice was originally published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on July 21, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 138] [page 35877]. The following panels are cancelled: N, O and P.                

*Contact Person for More Information:*                     Brenda Colley-Gilbert, Ph.D., Director, Extramural Research Program Office, CCCH, 4770 Buford Highway, MS K-92, Atlanta, GA 30341, Telephone (770) 488-6295.                

                    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                     **Federal Register**                     notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                

Elaine L. Baker,

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. E9-19501 Filed 8-13-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P