alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 76 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 76

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
     limiting the terms of office of Senators and Representatives.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 1995

 Mr. Hilleary (for himself, Mr. Nethercutt, Mrs. Myrick, Mr. McIntosh, 
  Mr. Bryant of Tennessee, Mr. Graham, Mr. Royce, Mr. LaTourette, Mr. 
 Kingston, Mr. Wamp, Mr. Tate, Mr. Salmon, Mr. Weller, Mrs. Waldholtz, 
Mr. Latham, Mr. Christensen, Mr. Norwood, Mr. Brownback, Mr. Bass, Mr. 
  Neumann, Mrs. Smith of Washington, Mr. Thornberry, Mr. Largent, Mr. 
   Coburn, Mr. Tiahrt, Mr. Hutchinson, Mr. Stockman, Mr. Paxon, Mr. 
    Dickey, Mr. Klug, and Mr. Peterson of Minnesota) introduced the 
following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
     limiting the terms of office of Senators and Representatives.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. No person who has been elected to the Senate two times 
shall be eligible for election or appointment to the Senate. No person 
who has been elected to the House of Representatives six times shall be 
eligible for election to the House of Representatives.
    ``Section 2. Election as a Senator or Representative before this 
Article is ratified shall not be taken into account for purposes of 
section 1, except that any State limitation on service for Members of 
Congress from that State, whether enacted before, on, or after the date 
of the ratification of this Article shall be valid, if such limitation 
does not exceed the limitation set forth in section 1.''.
                                 <all>
```
40110.

#### WARREN et al. v. HIERS.

Carlisle, Presiding Judge.

A petition against an agent of one of the contracting parties seeking to recover damages for the fraudulent procurement of a contract to purchase certain insulating material, alleging that false representations as to the quality of the material were fraudulently made by the agent *888of the seller and relied upon by the plaintiff purchaser to plaintiff’s damage, does not set forth a cause of action where the contract itself contains no provision as to the quality of the material, but does contain a provision that, “It constitutes the sole agreement, either written or verbal, existing between the parties on the subject matter mentioned herein, and any agreements or representations made by” seller “or its agents, other than that specifically set out herein, shall in no way be recognized or become binding upon either of the parties,” and where it is not alleged in the petition that the plaintiff was induced to sign the contract by reason of fraud, accident or mistake which prevented his knowing the contents. *Alpha Kappa Psi Bldg. Corp. v. Kennedy,*90 Ga. App. 587 (83 SE2d 580). *Willis v. Brooks*&c. *Motor Co.,*101 Ga. App. 248, 249 (113 SE2d 403).

Decided June 11, 1963.

*A. A. Roberts,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Brooks & McGregor, William T. Brooks,*contra.

The court did not err in dismissing the action on general demurrer.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bell and Hall, JJ., concur.*
# L_2021380EN.01002301.xml

| 27.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 380/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 380/23

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2019/876 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2019 amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 as regards the leverage ratio, the net stable funding ratio, requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities, counterparty credit risk, market risk, exposures to central counterparties, exposures to collective investment undertakings, large exposures, reporting and disclosure requirements, and Regulation (EU) No 648/2012

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 65 of 25 February 2021
  )

This corrigendum should be considered null and void.

---
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 5

To make majority party appointments to Senate Committees under paragraph

2 of rule XXV for the One Hundred Third Congress.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 1993

Mr. MITCHELL submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

To make majority party appointments to Senate Committees

under paragraph 2 of rule XXV for the One Hundred

Third Congress.

1 Resolved, That the following shall constitute the ma2 jority party’s membership on the standing committees for

3 the One Hundred Third Congress, or until their successors

4 are chosen:

5 COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE, NUTRITION, AND

6 FORESTRY: Mr. Leahy (Chairman), Mr. Pryor, Mr. Boren,

7 Mr. Heflin, Mr. Harkin, Mr. Conrad, Mr. Daschle, Mr.

8 Baucus, Mr. Kerrey, and Mr. Feingold.

9 COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS: Mr. Byrd (Chair10 man), Mr. Inouye, Mr. Hollings, Mr. Johnston, Mr.
2

SRES 5 ATS

1 Leahy, Mr. Sasser, Mr. DeConcini, Mr. Bumpers, Mr.

2 Lautenberg, Mr. Harkin, Ms. Mikulski, Mr. Reid, Mr.

3 Kerrey, Mr. Kohl, Ms. Murray, and Ms. Feinstein.

4 COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES: Mr. Nunn (Chair5 man), Mr. Exon, Mr. Levin, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Bingaman,

6 Mr. Glenn, Mr. Shelby, Mr. Byrd, Mr. Graham, Mr. Robb,

7 and Mr. Lieberman.

8 COMMITTEE ON BANKING, HOUSING, AND URBAN

9 AFFAIRS: Mr. Riegle (Chairman), Mr. Sarbanes, Mr.

10 Dodd, Mr. Sasser, Mr. Shelby, Mr. Kerry, Mr. Bryan,

11 Mrs. Boxer, Mr. Campbell, Ms. Moseley-Braun, and Ms.

12 Murray.

13 COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANS14 PORTATION: Mr. Hollings (Chairman), Mr. Inouye, Mr.

15 Ford, Mr. Exon, Mr. Rockefeller, Mr. Bentsen, Mr. Kerry,

16 Mr. Breaux, Mr. Bryan, Mr. Robb, and Mr. Dorgan.

17 COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES:

18 Mr. Johnston (Chairman), Mr. Bumpers, Mr. Ford, Mr.

19 Bradley, Mr. Bingaman, Mr. Conrad, Mr. Akaka, Mr.

20 Shelby, Mr. Wellstone, Mr. Campbell, and Mr. Mathews.

21 COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS:

22 Mr. Moynihan (Chairman), Mr. Mitchell, Mr. Baucus, Mr.

23 Lautenberg, Mr. Reid, Mr. Graham, Mr. Lieberman, Mr.

24 Metzenbaum, Mr. Wofford, and Mrs. Boxer.
3

SRES 5 ATS

1 COMMITTEE ON FINANCE: Mr. Bentsen (Chairman),

2 Mr. Moynihan, Mr. Baucus, Mr. Boren, Mr. Bradley, Mr.

3 Mitchell, Mr. Pryor, Mr. Riegle, Mr. Rockefeller, Mr.

4 Daschle, and Mr. Breaux.

5 COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS: Mr. Pell

6 (Chairman), Mr. Biden, Mr. Sarbanes, Mr. Dodd, Mr.

7 Kerry, Mr. Simon, Mr. Moynihan, Mr. Robb, Mr. Wofford,

8 Mr. Feingold, and Mr. Mathews.

9 COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS: Mr.

10 Glenn (Chairman), Mr. Nunn, Mr. Levin, Mr. Sasser, Mr.

11 Pryor, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. Akaka, and Mr. Dorgan.

12 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY: Mr. Biden (Chair13 man), Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Metzenbaum, Mr. DeConcini,

14 Mr. Leahy, Mr. Heflin, Mr. Simon, Mr. Kohl, Ms. Fein15 stein, and Ms. Moseley-Braun.

16 COMMITTEE ON LABOR AND HUMAN RESOURCES:

17 Mr. Kennedy (Chairman), Mr. Pell, Mr. Metzenbaum, Mr.

18 Dodd, Mr. Simon, Mr. Harkin, Ms. Mikulski, Mr. Binga19 man, Mr. Wellstone, and Mr. Wofford.

Æ
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Salaheddin Benyoussef, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[803 NYS2d 811]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 2, 2004, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Claimant, a waiter, left his job at a New York City restaurant after three weeks because he was not working enough hours to earn a sufficient wage. He did not, however, address the issue with the general manager prior to leaving. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualified him from receiving unemployment insurance benefits on the ground that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Claimant appeals.

We affirm. Dissatisfaction with one’s wages or hours does not constitute good cause for leaving a job *(see Matter of Bratmeyer [Commissioner of Labor],*7 AD3d 874, 874 [2004]; *Matter of Greco [Commissioner of Labor],*286 AD2d 796 [2001]). Here, claimant admitted that he quit his job because he had been scheduled to work only lunches and was not earning adequate compensation to meet his monthly expenses. He did not seek the general manager’s assistance in resolving the problem because he did not want to interfere with the chain of command. In view of claimant’s admissions, substantial evidence *903supports the Board’s finding that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Wednesday, September 16, 2015

1:47 PM
§ 1021.540 Voluntary information sharing among financial institutions. ( a ) Refer to § 1010.540 of this Chapter.
( b ) [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Birch Branch, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
Lazzeri, Chief Financial Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date:    May 15, 2007
                                                     /s/ Robert Lazzeri
                                                     ------------------
                                                     Robert Lazzeri
                                                     Chief Financial Officer and
                                                     Director
February 27, 1998


Mr. James Sever
104 Sever Lane
West Newton, PA 15089

Dear Jim:

WorldPort is pleased to provide you with the following offer to become its
Senior Vice President of Network Operations.  We look forward to your positive
response to this offer and we look forward to having you as a member of the
WorldPort team!

Terms of Employment:

Title:              Senior Vice President of Network Operations

Reporting:          You will report to the President and Chief Operating
                    Officer.

Responsibilities:   You will be responsible for all aspects of the design,
                    development and operation of WorldPort s global
                    telecommunications network.  In addition, you will be
                    responsible for the development of carrier and interconnect
                    agreements, billing operations, help desks, and data base
                    management.

Compensation:       Base Salary:                   $150,000

                    Signing Bonus:                  $50,000
                       $25,000 to be paid on your Start Date.
                       $25,000 to be paid within 90 days of the Start Date.

                    Annual Performance Bonus:             50% of Base Salary
                       Based on objectives to be agreed to
                       by Dan Wickersham and the Board of Directors.
                       Such objectives will be established within
                       90 days of the Start Date.

                    Five Year Options to purchase:         400,000 shares

                       Options to purchase 100,000 shares of Stock
                       will vest and be issued 1/3, 1/3, 1/3 on the
                       first, second and third anniversary of the Start Date
                       at a strike price equal to $2.00 per share.

                       Options to purchase 300,000 shares of Stock
                       will vest and be issued 1/3, 1/3, 1/3 on the
                       first, second and third anniversary of the Start Date
                       at a strike price equal to $3.50 per share.

                       Upon a change of control of the Company, all options 
                    shall vest                 immediately.

Benefits:           You will receive a full health benefits package
                    of the same type held by all WorldPort executives.

Start Date:         March 16, 1998.

Termination:        In the event that you are terminated without cause, you
                    shall receive a severance payment equal to 50% of your
                    annual salary.

Jim, if you are in agreement with these terms, please place your signature in
the space provided below, and fax this letter back to me.  We look forward to
working with you.

                         Sincerely,



                         Paul A. Moore
                         Chief Executive Officer

I hereby accept the above employment terms:


___________________________________          Date:  __________________
James Sever
Cash Compensation for Non-Employee Directors



 Exhibit 10.22 
 Cash Compensation for Non-Employee Directors 
 Power Integrations non-employee board members shall receive the following cash compensation
for the services performed, which cash compensation is cumulative: 
 Retainers: 
  

				
	 Service as a non-employee director:
	  	$	 5,000 per quarter
	 Service as chairman of the audit committee:
	  	$	 5,000 per quarter
	 Service as chairman of the compensation committee:
	  	$	 1,875 per quarter
	 Service as chairman of the nominating committee:
	  	$	 1,250 per quarter

 Meeting attendance fees: 
  

				
	 Board meeting in person:
	  	$	 1,500
	 Board meeting telephonically:
	  	$	750
	 Audit, Compensation, or Nominating Committee meeting in person:
	  	$	1,000
	 Audit, Compensation, or Nominating Committee meeting telephonically:
	  	$	500
	 One-time Special Committee fees (Messrs. Iyer and Fiebiger):
	  	$	25,000

 In addition, non-employee directors shall be reimbursed for all reasonable travel and related expenses incurred in
connection with attending board and committee meetings.
EXHIBIT
10.1


Identification of
Criteria under the 2003 Senior Executive Incentive Plan, as amended


The Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Compensation Committee”) of Iron
Mountain Incorporated (the “Company”) established the criteria that will be
used to determine the annual bonus payable to the Chief Executive Officer of
the Company under the Company’s 2003 Senior Executive Incentive Plan, as
amended. The categories of criteria, are as follows: (1) achieving gross
revenue targets, (2) achieving operating income before depreciation and
amortization (OIBDA) targets, and (3) achievement of other corporate goals. The
category “achievement of other corporate goals” includes various strategic
initiatives of the Company. The bonus may be reduced in the discretion of the
Compensation Committee, after consultation with the Chairs of the Audit and
Executive Committees of the Board of Directors, in accordance with the Company’s
2003 Senior Executive Incentive Plan, as amended.
IV

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 202

Expressing the sense of the Congress that United States companies should

acquire technology that was developed by United States companies from

those companies instead of from their overseas competitors.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 25, 1996

Mr. FRANKS of Connecticut submitted the following concurrent resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that United States

companies should acquire technology that was developed

by United States companies from those companies instead of from their overseas competitors.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that,

3 when a United States company acquires technology that

4 has been developed by other United States companies with

5 the assistance of taxpayer dollars, that company should

6 acquire the technology from the company that developed

7 it instead of from overseas sources, so long as the United
2

•HCON 202 IH

1 States source is offering a comparable product in terms

2 of both performance and cost.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 156 (Friday, August 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 41110]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19464]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Notice of Sanders County Resource Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community 
Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393) the Lolo and Kootenai 
National Forests' Sanders County Resource Advisory Committee will meet 
on August 20 at 7 p.m. in Thompson Falls, Montana for a business 
meeting. The meeting is open to the public.

DATES: August 20, 2009.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Thompson Falls Courthouse, 
1111 Main Street, Thompson Falls, MT 59873.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randy Hojem, Designated Federal 
Official (DFO), District Ranger, Plains Ranger District, Lolo National 
Forest at (406) 826-3821.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agenda topics include recommendations on new 
RAC project proposals, reviewing progress on current projects, and 
receiving public comment. If the meeting location is changed, notice 
will be posted in the local newspapers, including the Clark Fork Valley 
Press, and Sanders County Ledger.

    Dated: July 30, 2009.
Randy Hojem,
DFO, Plains Ranger District, Lolo National Forest.
[FR Doc. E9-19464 Filed 8-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 15

- 00385

- CR

Willie Lee Amie, Jr.

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From Criminal District Court No. 2

o f Tarrant County (1394034D )

February 25, 2016

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is af firmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

Justice Lee Gabriel
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1009 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 1009

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 22, 1996

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
                   For the relief of Lloyd B. Gamble.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS.

    (a) Payment.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of any 
money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to Lloyd B. Gamble of 
Fairfax, Virginia, the sum of $253,488.
    (b) Basis.--The payment required by subsection (a) shall be to 
compensate Lloyd B. Gamble for the injuries sustained by him as a 
result of the administration to him, without his knowledge, of lysergic 
acid diethylamide by United States Army personnel in 1957.

SEC. 2. SATISFACTION OF CLAIMS.

    The payment made pursuant to section 1 shall be in full 
satisfaction of all claims Lloyd B. Gamble may have against the United 
States for any injury described in such section.

SEC. 3. INELIGIBILITY FOR ADDITIONAL BENEFITS.

    Upon payment of the sum referred to in section 1, Lloyd B. Gamble 
shall not be eligible for any compensation or benefits from the 
Department of Veterans Affairs or the Department of Defense for any 
injury described in such section.

SEC. 4. LIMITATION OF AGENTS AND ATTORNEYS FEES.

    It shall be unlawful for an amount of more than 10 percent of the 
amount paid pursuant to section 1 to be paid to or received by any 
agent or attorney for any service rendered to Lloyd B. Gamble in 
connection with the benefits provided by this Act. Any person who 
violates this section shall be guilty of an infraction and shall be 
subject to a fine in the amount provided in title 18, United States 
Code.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 21, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.

                              By Linda Nave,

                                                          Deputy Clerk.
```
39996.

#### BROWN v. THE STATE.

Franicum, Judge.

1. The- defendant was convicted in the City Court of Sandersville of possessing nontax-paid liquor. Her motion for a new trial was overruled and the assignment of error here is on that judgment. In the first ground of her motion she assigned error on the admission in evidence over timely objection of the affidavit and search warrant under which officers entered and searched her house. The substance of the objection to this document was that the warrant was void because the affidavit was made merely on information and belief of the affiant and the warrant was issued by the justice of the peace without a showing of probable cause for the issuance of the warrant having been made before him. The affidavit and warrant, copies of which were incorporated in this ground of the motion, were substantially the same as those in *Smoot v. State,*160 Ga. 744 (128 SE 909, 41 ALR 1633), and under the ruling therein the warrant was in fact a void warrant. The admission in evidence of the affidavit and warrant over the objection made was erroneous and presumptively harmful to the defendant, and cause- for reversal of the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial.

2. Where the trial court charged the jury that the defendant entered upon the trial with a presumption of innocence in her favor; that this presumption remained with her during *673the trial until overcome by evidence on the part of the State sufficient to convince the jury to a moral certainty and beyond a reasonable doubt of the guilt of the defendant as charged, the failure of the court to charge without request that the *burden*was upon the State to produce evidence sufficient to convince the jury to a moral certainty and beyond a reasonable doubt of the defendant’s guilt was not cause for reversal. *Bryant v. State,*153 Ga. 534 (1) (113 SE 4); *Swint v. State,*203 Ga. 430 (5) (47 SE2d 65); *Rhodes v. State,*64 Ga. App. 367 (13 SE2d 201).

Decided April 23, 1963.

*Marvin Hartley, Jr., Casey Thigpen,*for plaintiff in error.

*Thomas A. Hutcheson, Solicitor,*contra.

3. The general grounds of the motion for a new trial are not passed upon since the evidence on another trial may not be the same.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.*