alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
39938.

#### SCHIMMEL v. GREENWAY.

Decided January 24, 1963.

*Wheeler, Robinson & Thompson, B. Carl Buice,*for plaintiff in error.

*Brannon, Brannon & Schuder, Everett C. Brannon, Jr.,*contra.

*258Bell, Judge.

The sole question raised by this appeal is whether the statute of limitation bars the plaintiff’s cause of action. *Code*§ 3-1004 provides that actions for injuries to the person shall be brought within 2 years after the right of action accrues except for injuries to the reputation which shall be brought within one year. Under this statute, it is clear the action is barred if the injury to the plaintiff’s husband which resulted in loss of consortium to the wife is an injury to the person of the plaintiff. On the other hand if the plaintiff's loss of consortium of the husband is a property right, the action was seasonably filed, as actions for injuries to property rights may be brought within 4 years of the time of the accrual of the cause of action. *Code*§ 3-1002. In *Brown v. Georgia-Tennessee Coaches, Inc.,*88 Ga. App. 519 (77 SE2d 24), this court, for the first time, held that a wife could recover for the loss of consortium and companionship of the husband by reason of negligent injuries inflicted upon him by third persons. In reaching that conclusion this court held that the loss of services is an outworn fiction and the wife’s interest in the undisturbed relation with her consort is no less worthy than that given the husband. “Nor is any valid reason apparent for allowing her recovery for a direct interference by alienation of affections, and denying it for more indirect harm through personal injury to the husband, where no such distinction is made in his action.” Ibid., p. 530. The opinion went on to hold that the right to recover for loss of the husband’s earnings and earning capacity was confined to the husband alone. Ibid., p. 532. In *Hosford v. Hosford,*58 Ga. App. 188 (198 SE 289), the question was presented whether an action for alienation of affections was an injury to the person within *Code*§ 3-1004. This court held that it was an injury to the person which must be brought within two years.

While there is no direct holding in this State that an action brought by the wife for the loss of consortium of the husband through negligent infliction of injuries is an action for injury to the person, under the *Brovm*and *Hosford*cases we deem it abundantly clear that such an action is basically for the same loss sustained by the wife as in actions for alienation of affections. *259In the reverse situation where the action was brought by the husband for loss of consortium of the wife through negligence it was held that action was one for injury to the person of the husband and barred under a statute of limitation having almost identical language with that of our statute of limitation. Rex v. Hutner, 26 N.J. 489 (140 A2d 753). See also 108 ALR 526.

Since the action here was for an injury to the person, it was barred by the two-year statute of limitation. The trial judge, therefore, erred in overruling the defendant’s demurrers.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Carlisle, P. J., and Hall, J., concur.*
# Amtsblatt C 33A/15.

| | ISSN 1725-2407 |
| --- | --- |
| Amtsblatt
  der Europäischen Union | C 33A |
| | |
| Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache | Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen | 50. Jahrgang15. Februar 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2407

Amtsblatt

der Europäischen Union

C 33A

Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache

Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen

50. Jahrgang15. Februar 2007

---

| Informationsnummer | Inhalt | Seite |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| 2007/C 033A/01 | Hinweis für die Leser | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Inhalt

Seite

2007/C 033A/01

Hinweis für die Leser

1

| | Berichtigungen |
| --- | --- |
| 2007/C 033A/02 | Berichtigung der Reserveliste der Bekanntmachung des allgemeinen Auswahlverfahrens EPSO/AD/43/06 — Rechts- und Sprachsachverständige (AD7) bulgarischer Sprache (ABl. C 22 A vom 31.1.2007) | 3 |

Berichtigungen

2007/C 033A/02

Berichtigung der Reserveliste der Bekanntmachung des allgemeinen Auswahlverfahrens EPSO/AD/43/06 — Rechts- und Sprachsachverständige (AD7) bulgarischer Sprache (ABl. C 22 A vom 31.1.2007)

3

| DE | |
| --- | --- |

DE

---

15.2.2007

| 15.2.2007 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | CA 33/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

CA 33/1

---

HINWEIS FÜR DIE LESER

Image

---

Berichtigungen

| 15.2.2007 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | CA 33/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2007

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

CA 33/3

---

Berichtigung der Reserveliste der Bekanntmachung des allgemeinen Auswahlverfahrens EPSO/AD/43/06 — Rechts- und Sprachsachverständige (AD7) bulgarischer Sprache

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 22 A vom 31. Januar 2007
  )

(2007/C 33 A/01)

Die Reserveliste des allgemeinen Auswahlverfahrens EPSO/AD/43/06 — Rechts- und Sprachsachverständige (AD7) bulgarischer Sprache, Zweig „Gerichtshof“ muss heißen:

RESERVELISTEN
   (1)

ALLGEMEINES AUSWAHLVERFAHREN EPSO/AD/43/06

RECHTS- UND SPRACHSACHVERSTÄNDIGE (AD7)

BULGARISCHER SPRACHE (BG)

Zweig „Gerichtshof“

| ABADHJIEVA | STANISLAVA |
| --- | --- |
| ALEXOVA | SIMONA |
| ANGUELOVA | ANTONIA |
| BOYADJIEVA | NEDIALKA |
| GEORGIEVA | TANJA |
| GROZEV | ROSSEN |
| GUEORGIEVA | DEANA |
| HADJIYSKA | NEVYANA |
| KALINOV | ANGEL |
| KOLEVA | KATERINA |
| MITREV | GEORGI |
| OBAYDI | SIVIYA |
| PARVANOV | PETRE |
| RADEVA | DIANA |

ABADHJIEVA

STANISLAVA

ALEXOVA

SIMONA

ANGUELOVA

ANTONIA

BOYADJIEVA

NEDIALKA

GEORGIEVA

TANJA

GROZEV

ROSSEN

GUEORGIEVA

DEANA

HADJIYSKA

NEVYANA

KALINOV

ANGEL

KOLEVA

KATERINA

MITREV

GEORGI

OBAYDI

SIVIYA

PARVANOV

PETRE

RADEVA

DIANA

---

(1)  Auf ausdrücklichen Wunsch einer erfolgreichen Prüfungsteilnehmerin oder eines erfolgreichen Prüfungsteilnehmers wird ihr bzw. sein Name nicht veröffentlicht.

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.6501(n)-1 Special rules for chapter 42 and similar taxes. ( a ) *Return filed by private foundation, plan, trust, or other organization.* ( 1 ) A return filed by a private foundation, plan, trust, or other organization (as the case may be) with respect to any act giving rise to a tax imposed by chapter 42 (other than a tax imposed by section 4940), or by section 4975 shall be considered, for purposes of section 6501, to be the return of all persons required to file a return with respect to any such tax arising from such act, notwithstanding that all such persons have not signed the return. In the case of a private foundation that files a Form 990-PF (or a Form 5227 in the case of a nonexempt foundation described in section 4947(a)(2)), which contains questions with respect to such taxes, the filing of such form by such foundation shall constitute the filing of a return with respect to any such act, even though the foundation incorrectly answered such questions.
( 2 ) For purposes of section 4940, the return referred to in this section is the return filed by the private foundation for the taxable year for which the tax is imposed.
( b ) *Failure of private foundation plan, trust, or other organization to file.* The period of limitations on assessment and collection described in section 6501 does not begin with respect to any person liable for tax under chapter 42 (other than section 4940) or section 4975 arising from a given act, where the private foundation, plan, trust, or other organization (as the case may be) has not filed its required return that reports such act for the year in which the act (or failure to act) giving rise to liability for such tax occurred.
( c ) *Example.* The provision of this section may be illustrated by the following example:
Example. In 1973, D, an individual taxpayer who was a disqualified person under the provisions of section 4946(a)(1), participated in an act of self-dealing with a private foundation and incurred a tax under section 4941(a)(1). On May 15, 1974, the private foundation files a Form 990-PF and answers all the questions thereon with regard to any acts of self-dealing (as defined in section 4941(d)) in which it may have engaged in 1973. Assuming that the foundation's return was not a false or fraudulent return nor made with the willful attempt to defeat tax, the period of limitations on assessment and collection under section 6501(a) shall start with respect to any tax under section 4941(a) or section 4941(b) imposed on D arising out of that transaction with such foundation.
[T.D. 7838, 47 FR 44251, Oct. 7, 1982, as amended by T.D. 8920, 66 FR 2171, Jan. 10, 2001]
NOTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ KATHE BURGER, PHILIP J. BURGER, SARAH B. BURGER, PETER M. BURGER, ELIZABETH A. BURGER, CHAPMAN/SPRING GARDEN, LLC, CHANEY

- FRYE #4, LLC, LAROSE PROPERTIES, INC., MICHELLE AGAPION MORGAN, ESTATE OF RICHARD AUSTIN LANE, THOMAS G. HAYES, individually and on be half of the Personal Representative of the Estate of Harold W. Hayes, HISTORIC WAFCO CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Plaintiff

- Appellee

EMILY ELIZABETH OWEN, GCP REAL IV, LLC, GUILFORD BUILDERS SUPPLY CO., JESC, LLC, Plaintiffs

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant

- Appellant

______________________
2024

- 1249

______________________ Case: 24-1249 Document: 21 Page: 1 Filed: 03/13/2024B URGER V

. US 2

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:19

- cv

- 01596

- LAS, 1:19

- cv

- 01942

- LAS

, Senior Judge Loren A. Smith.

______________________ O R D E R The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that: (1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App. P. 42 (b). (2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

March 13, 2024 Date

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: March 13, 2024 Case: 24-1249 Document: 21 Page: 2 Filed: 03/13/2024
Exhibit
      32.1




ICONIX
      BRAND GROUP, INC.




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF




THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Iconix Brand Group, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2007 (the "Report"), I, Neil Cole,
      President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Neil ColeNeil
                  Cole
                President
                  and Chief Executive Officer




Date:
      September 24, 2007
# L_2020272EN.01000101.xml

| 19.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 272/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 272/1

---

Corrigendum to definitive adoption (EU, Euratom) 2020/1078 of amending budget No 4 of the European Union for the financial year 2020

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 254 of 4 August 2020
  )

On page 36, row ‘Total’, in column ‘Budget 2020 – Payments’:

for:

‘
  167 248 223 575
  ’,

read:

‘
  150 948 403 832
  ’;

on page 36, row ‘Total’, in column ‘New amount – Payments’:

for:

‘
  167 520 721 783
  ’,

read:

‘
  151 220 902 040
  ’.

---
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed 

October 6, 2020.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-20-00417-CV

SIGNATURE CONCRETE OF HOUSTON, LLC AND CLAY HUDSON, 

Appellants

V.

SUNCOAST POST-TENSION LTD., Appellee

On Appeal from the 164th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2019-12429

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment signed April 30, 2020. On September 18, 

2020, appellants filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1

(a)(1). The motion is granted. 

We dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Spain, Hassan, and Poissant.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2020076EN.01003601.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 12.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 76/36 |

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/1966 of 27 November 2019 amending and correcting Annexes II, III and V to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on cosmetic products

(
[Official Journal of the European Union L 307 of 28 November 2019](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2019_307_R_TOC)
)

On page 20, point 2 of Annex 1 is replaced as follows:

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| “(2) | Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 is amended as follows: Entry 98 is replaced by the following: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | ‘98 | Benzoic acid, 2-hydroxy-[(1)](#ntr1-L_2020076EN.01003601-E0001) | Salicylic acid | 69-72-7 | 200-712-3 | | | | | --- | --- | | (a) | Rinse-off hair products | | | | | --- | --- | | (b) | Other products except body lotion, eye shadow, mascara, eyeliner, lipstick, roll-on deodorant | | | | | | --- | --- | | (a) | 3,0 % | | | | | --- | --- | | (b) | 2,0 % | | Not to be used in preparations for children under 3 years of age. Not to be used in applications that may lead to exposure of the end-user’s lungs by inhalation. Not to be used in oral products. For purposes other than inhibiting the development of micro-organisms in the product. This purpose has to be apparent from the presentation of the product. | Not to be used for children under 3 years of age[(2)](#ntr2-L_2020076EN.01003601-E0002) | |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-L_2020076EN.01003601-E0001)  For use as a preservative see Annex V, No 3.

[(2)](#ntc2-L_2020076EN.01003601-E0002)  Solely for products which might be used for children under 3 years of age.’
”

---
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1127

To limit the issuance of patents on medical procedures.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 3, 1995

Mr. GANSKE (for himself and Mr. WYDEN) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To limit the issuance of patents on medical procedures.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medical Procedures

5 Innovation and Affordability Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON ISSUANCE OF PATENTS.

7 On or after the date of the enactment of this Act,

8 a patent may not be issued for any invention or discovery

9 of a technique, method, or process for performing a sur10 gical or medical procedure, administering a surgical or

11 medical therapy, or making a medical diagnosis, except

12 that if the technique, method, or process is performed by
2

•HR 1127 IH

1 or as a necessary component of a machine, manufacture,

2 or composition of matter or improvement thereof which

3 is itself patentable subject matter, the patent on such ma4 chine, manufacture, or composition of matter may claim

5 such technique, method, or process.

Æ
II

Calendar No. 488

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1014

[Report No. 104–313]

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 15, 1995

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural

Resources

JUNE 28, 1996

Reported by Mr. MURKOWSKI, without amendment

AN ACT

To authorize extension of time limitation for a FERC-issued

hydroelectric license.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding the time limitation of section 13 of

4 the Federal Power Act, the Federal Energy Regulatory

5 Commission, upon the request of the licensee for FERC

6 Project No. 3701, is authorized, in accordance with the

7 good faith, due diligence, and public interest requirements

8 of section 13 and the Commission’s procedures under such
2

HR 1014 RS

1 section, to extend the time required for the licensee to

2 commence the construction of such project for up to a

3 maximum of 3 consecutive 2-year periods. This section

4 shall take effect for the project upon the expiration of the

5 extension (issued by the Commission under section 13) of

6 the period required for commencement of construction of

7 such project. If the license for FERC Project 3701 should

8 expire prior to the date of enactment of this Act, the Com9 mission is authorized and directed to reinstate effective

10 June 1, 1995, the license previously issued for such

11 project.

Passed the House of Representatives November 13,

1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.

Calendar No. 488

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1014

[Report No. 104–313]

AN ACT

To authorize extension of time limitation for a

FERC-issued hydroelectric license.

JUNE 28, 1996

Reported without amendment
40136.

#### WEIGHT v. THE STATE.

Frankum, Judge.

The evidence authorized the conviction of the defendant. The sole special ground of the defendant’s motion for new trial assigns error on the admission of certain testimony over objection. The record shows that the trial *801judge, in ruling on the objection, reserved his decision until later in the trial. It does not appear that any further objection to this testimony was made or that the matter was thereafter called to the judge’s attention. It was not incumbent upon the judge to bear the matter in mind and on his own motion exclude that which had been conditionally admitted. If counsel desired some further ruling, he should have invoked it by calling the matter to the court’s attention. *Gibson v. State,*178 Ga. 707, 708 (2) (174 SE 354); *Griffin v. State,*85 Ga. App. 602, 604 (6) (69 SE2d 665). The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Decided May 21, 1963.

*Walter O. Allanson,*for plaintiff in error.

*William T. Boyd, Solicitor General, Frank S. French, Eugene L. Tiller,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.*
Elizabeth A. Young, CSR, RPR 

Official Court Reporter

P. O. Box 747

Belton, Texas 76513

254 933-5268

August 13, 2015

Mr. Jeffrey D. Kyle

Clerk, Court of Appeals

P. O. Box 12547

Austin, Texas 78711-2547

tel 512 463-1733

fax 512 463-1685

In re: State vs John Lee Bowman

 COA: 03-15-00263-CR TC # 73061

Attn: Chris Knowles

Dear Chris,

I am requesting an extension to complete this reporter's 

record by September 15, 2015.

Sincerely,

/s/ Elizabeth A. Young

Elizabeth A. Young
#### § 509.109 Interest.

The rate of United States tax imposed by the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 upon interest on bonds, securities, notes, debentures, or on any other form of indebtedness, including interest on obligations of the United States, obligations of instrumentalities of the United States, and mortgages and bonds secured by real property, which is derived from sources within the United States by a nonresident alien individual who is a resident of Switzerland, or by a Swiss corporation or other entity, shall not exceed 5 percent under the provisions of Article VII of the convention, if such alien, corporation, or other entity at no time during the taxable year in which such interest is derived has a permanent establishment in the United States.
<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                            Exhibit 11.1
                                                                                                            ------------

                                          SLADE'S FERRY BANCORP. AND SUBSIDIARY
                                               QUARTERLY DATA (UNAUDITED)


                                           Three Months Ended September 30,           Nine Months Ended September 30,
                                               2006                2005                  2006                2005
                                         -------------------------------------     -------------------------------------
                                         (In thousands, except per share date)     (In thousands, except per share date)
<S>                                         <C>                 <C>                   <C>                 <C>
Net income                                  $    1,043          $      900            $    2,576          $    2,848
                                            ==========          ==========            ==========          ==========

Average common shares outstanding            4,162,753           4,122,631             4,079,396           4,104,304
                                            ==========          ==========            ==========          ==========

Basic earnings per share                    $     0.25          $     0.22            $     0.62          $     0.69
                                            ==========          ==========            ==========          ==========


Average common shares outstanding            4,162,753           4,122,631             4,079,396           4,104,304
Net effect of dilutive stock options            11,707              22,935                15,356              27,824
                                            ----------          ----------            ----------          ----------
Adjusted common shares outstanding           4,174,460           4,145,566             4,094,752           4,132,128
                                            ==========          ==========            ==========          ==========

Diluted earnings per share                  $     0.25          $     0.22            $     0.62          $     0.69
                                            ==========          ==========            ==========          ==========

                                                           45
</TABLE>
§ 54.6011-1T General requirement of return, statement, or list (temporary). ( a ) *Tax on reversions of qualified plan assets to employer.* Every employer liable for the tax imposed under section 4980(a) with respect to an employer reversion (as defined in section 4980(c)(2)) shall file a quarterly return on Form 5330 and shall include therein the information required by such form and the instructions issued with respect thereto. The quarterly return on Form 5330 shall be filed with respect to employer reversions from each qualified plan (as defined in section 4980(c)(1)).
( b ) [Reserved]
[T.D. 8133, 52 FR 10563, Apr. 2, 1987, as amended by T.D. 9334, 72 FR 36873, July 6, 2007; 72 FR 45895, Aug. 16, 2007; T.D. 9492, 75 FR 38709, July 6, 2010]