alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 175 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                             H. J. RES. 175

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1996, and 
                          for other purposes.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 175

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1996, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, 

                   TITLE I--Continuing Appropriations

    Section 101. Public Law 104-99 is further amended by striking out 
``April 24, 1996'' in sections 106(c), 112, 126(c), 202(c), and 214 and 
inserting in lieu thereof ``April 25, 1996''; and that Public Law 104-
92 is further amended by striking out ``April 24, 1996'' in section 
106(c) and inserting in lieu thereof ``April 25, 1996''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 24, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
§ 1010.912 Persons who may issue summons. For purposes of this chapter, the following officials are hereby designated as delegates of the Secretary who are authorized to issue a summons under § 1010.911, solely for the purposes of civil enforcement of this chapter: ( a ) *FinCEN.* The Director, FinCEN.
( b ) *Internal Revenue Service.* Except with respect to § 1010.340 of this chapter, the Commissioner, the Deputy Commissioner, or a delegate of either official, and, for the purposes of perfecting seizures and forfeitures related to civil enforcement of this chapter, the Chief (Criminal Investigation) or a delegate.
( c ) *Customs and Border Protection.* With respect to § 1010.340 of this chapter, the Commissioner, the Deputy Commissioner, the Assistant Commissioner (Enforcement), Regional Commissioners, Assistant Regional Commissioners (Enforcement), and Special Agents in Charge.
RTI CONTACT REPORT

0210426.004.006 

From: Cindy Hancy, RTI International 

Date of Contact: July 7, 2010 

Contacted by: Telephone 

Company/Agency: EPI, New Berlin WI

Telephone Number: (262) 786-9330 

Person Contacted: Larry Abbott 

CONTACT SUMMARY:

Mr. Abbott was contacted to discuss costs for EPI’s PFOS and non-PFOS based wetting 

agents for the technology review and residual risk assessment of chromium 

electroplating. Mr. Abbott provided costs for both types of wetting agents but stated that 

EPI no longer sells PFOS based wetting agents and therefore the PFOS based costs were 

a few years old. 

Non PFOS based wetting agent: Emist 7 

5 Gallon Container – Price Per Gallon: $65.64 

55 Gallon Drum – Price Per Gallon: $48.88 

PFOS based wetting agent:

5 Gallon Container - Price Per Gallon: $60.25 

55 Gallon Drum – Price Per Gallon: Not Available

Mr. Abbott was asked if he could provide costs in units of price per amp hour or if he had 

any type of usage information for the two types of wetting agent. Mr. Abbott did not 

have a price per amp hour because according to him it varies too much to calculate, but 

did provide a usage of 0.1 -0.3% volume for Emist 7. Mr. Abbott did not have a usage 

for the PFOS based wetting agent but assumed it to be similar to Emist 7. Mr. Abbott also 

pointed out that these wetting agents are sold mostly to the decorative chrome plating 

industry. 

1
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1155 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1155

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
               coastwise trade for the vessel FIFTY ONE.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 1995

   Mr. Shaw introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
               coastwise trade for the vessel FIFTY ONE.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the 
Act of June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 12106 of title 
46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may issue a 
certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for 
employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel FIFTY ONE (United 
States official number 1020419).
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Ernest Scott, Appellant, v New York State Division of Parole et al., Respondents.

[805 NYS2d 440]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Ceresia, Jr., J.), entered February 8, 2005 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

In 1999, petitioner pleaded guilty to manslaughter in the second degree after he was accused of conspiring with an ac*951quaintance to kill his business partner. Following a heated argument with the victim, petitioner drove the acquaintance to the victim’s home and provided him with a gun, whereupon the acquaintance fatally shot the victim and injured the victim’s girlfriend by shooting her in the head. Petitioner confessed to his involvement in the crime more than four years later after he was arrested for felony marihuana possession. He was sentenced to 5 to 15 years in prison and made his first appearance before the Board of Parole in December 2003. The Board denied petitioner’s request for parole release and its decision was affirmed on administrative appeal. Petitioner then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging that decision. Supreme Court dismissed the petition, resulting in this appeal.

Contrary to petitioner’s claim, the Board took into account the relevant factors in denying his request for parole release, including the serious nature of his crime as well as his receipt of a certificate of earned eligibility, remorse for his conduct, program accomplishments, vocational skills, clean disciplinary record and postrelease plans for employment and residence (see Executive Law § 259-i [1] [a]; [2] [c] [A]; *see also Matter of Davis v New York State Bd. of Parole,*17 AD3d 970, 970 [2005]; *Matter of Aulet v Travis,*17 AD3d 883, 884 [2005]). Furthermore, there is nothing to substantiate petitioner’s claim that the Board’s decision was part of an executive policy to deny release to violent felons (see *Matter of Davis v New York State Bd. of Parole, supra*at 970). On the record as a whole, we do not find that the Board’s decision exhibits “ ‘irrationality bordering on impropriety’ ” *(Matter of Silmon v Travis,*95 NY2d 470, 476 [2000], quoting *Matter of Russo v New York State Bd. of Parole,*50 NY2d 69, 77 [1980]) and, therefore, we decline to disturb it. We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be unavailing.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
Order filed August 30, 2012.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 12

- 00169

- CV

____________ LAMBERT ADUMEKWE , Appellant

V.
NEW HAMPHIRE INSURAN CE COMPANY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 269th District Court

Harris County, Texas Tria l Court Cause No. 2010

- 81456



### O R D E R
Appellant = s brief was due August 13, 2012

. No brief or motion for extension of time has been filed.
Unless appellant files his brief with the clerk of this court on or before September 12, 2012 , the court will dis miss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Joseph, Appellant.

[802 NYS2d 685]

*175Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Herbert I. Altman, J.), rendered February 20, 2002, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of five years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly declined to submit assault in the third degree as a lesser included offense. Contrary to defendant’s unpreserved arguments, there was no reasonable view of the evidence *(see People v Negron,*91 NY2d 788 [1998]) that the victim’s injuries were caused by something other than being struck by a bottle, or that the bottle was not a dangerous instrument.

The court’s *Sandoval*ruling balanced the appropriate factors and was a proper exercise of discretion *(see People v Hayes,*97 NY2d 203 [2002]; *People v Walker,*83 NY2d 455, 458-459 [1994]). The court permitted the People to elicit that defendant had one unspecified felony conviction and four unspecified misdemeanor convictions, and that he had used five aliases. These matters were highly relevant to defendant’s credibility, and were not excessively numerous. Concur—Sullivan, J.P., Ellerin, Williams, Gonzalez and McGuire, JJ.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Israel CERVANTES-PIMENTAL, aka Jose Luis Madrigal, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 01-10528.

D.C. No. CR-01-00563-PGR-01.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 10, 2002 *.

Decided June 18, 2002.

Before RYMER, T.G. NELSON and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Israel Cervantes-Pimental appeals his conviction, pursuant to a guilty plea, and sentence for illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) with a sentencing enhancement pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2).

Cervantes-Pimental’s attorney has filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and has moved to withdraw as counsel of record. Cervantes-Pimental has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

*906Because our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), indicates that the plea agreement, including the waiver of the right to appeal, was entered knowingly and voluntarily, *United States v. Aguilar-Muniz,*156 F.3d 974, 976 (9th Cir.1998) (waiver of right to appeal is valid if knowing and voluntary), we enforce the waiver, grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and dismiss the appeal.

DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
# L_2019134EN.01001201.xml

| 22.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 134/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 134/12

---

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) 2019/821

of 12 March 2019

amending Regulation (EU) 2016/1076 of the European Parliament and of the Council in order to include the Independent State of Samoa in Annex I

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2016/1076 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 applying the arrangements for products originating in certain states which are part of the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) Group of States provided for in agreements establishing, or leading to the establishment of, Economic Partnership Agreements (1), and in particular Article 2(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2016/1076 lists the countries to which the market access arrangements provided for by that Regulation apply. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2016/1076 lists the countries to which the market access arrangements provided for by that Regulation apply.

| (2) | On 6 December 2018, the Council approved, on behalf of the Union, the accession of Samoa to the interim Economic Partnership Agreement between the Union and the Pacific States. Following Samoa's deposition of its Act of Accession, the interim Economic Partnership Agreement is provisionally applied between the Union and Samoa from 31 December 2018. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 6 December 2018, the Council approved, on behalf of the Union, the accession of Samoa to the interim Economic Partnership Agreement between the Union and the Pacific States. Following Samoa's deposition of its Act of Accession, the interim Economic Partnership Agreement is provisionally applied between the Union and Samoa from 31 December 2018.

| (3) | Therefore the Independent State of Samoa should be included in Annex I, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Therefore the Independent State of Samoa should be included in Annex I,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2016/1076 the following is inserted after the words ‘SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES’:

‘THE INDEPENDENT STATE OF SAMOA’.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 March 2019.

For the Commission

The President

Jean-Claude JUNCKER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 185, 8.7.2016, p. 1.

1

---
1 MEMORANDUM

From: Office of Air Qual ity Planning and Standards U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

To: EGU NSPS Docket (EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0044)

Date: March, 2013

Subject: Monitoring Requirements for Facilities with PM CEMS that Co mmenced Construction, Reconstruction, or Modification prior to May 4, 2011

In paragraph 60.48Da(f), we have changed “have non- out-of-control data for at least 18 hours of unit operation during which the standard applies” to “have out-of-control periods totaling no more than 6 hours of unit operation during which the standard applies” to make the rule more readable and eliminated the requirement to roll emissions data reco rded on days without sufficient data to determine a daily average to the following operating day. Upon fu rther evaluation, we have concluded that this provision would be rarely used, and the 90% data av ailability requirement in paragraph 60.48Da(p)(5) is sufficient now, given our current understanding of PM CEMS operation, to assure adequate monitoring for program purposes.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      11,435,509
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       4,101,647
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             1,935,658
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  8,413,014
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      29,081,903
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        28,345,000
<LOANS>                                    140,810,932
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,458,972
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             198,761,022
<DEPOSITS>                                 156,113,356
<SHORT-TERM>                                13,066,997
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          3,060,887
<LONG-TERM>                                  3,950,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,913
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,546,869
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             198,761,022
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              5,255,823
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,207,965
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                97,900
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             6,561,708
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,670,212
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,101,422
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,460,266
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   74,657
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,543,247
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,496,190
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     967,401
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   967,401
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .41
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.45
<LOANS-NON>                                    334,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   472,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               632,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,185,672
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  166,148
<RECOVERIES>                                    19,675
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,458,972
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,458,972
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      1,458,972
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                   5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Partnership's  unaudited financial  statements for the quarter ended October 31,
1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 Jul-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                      Oct-31-1999
<CASH>                                  1,548
<SECURITIES>                            2,528
<RECEIVABLES>                          18,101
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        1,691
<PP&E>                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         22,310
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      62
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                             22,248
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           22,310
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          438
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             127
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           311
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       311
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                              311
<EPS-BASIC>                            0.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0.56


</TABLE>
Searched for **https://www.healthcare.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.healthcare.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 16, 2015

s0909

Order 

Clerk

September 16, 2015

150984

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 150984

COA: 325002

Kent CC: 14-008489-FH

JUAN VALENTIN CUBUR-TOCAY,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 10, 2014 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Andrew J. Newman, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[803 NYS2d 741]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 6, 2004, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he failed to comply with certification and registration requirements.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits effective November 10, 2003 through November 16, 2003 because he failed to certify for that benefit week within the seven-day period for certification, and effective November 17, 2003 through December 28, 2003 because he failed to comply with the registration requirements. It is well settled that registering and certifying for benefits in accordance with the Labor Law and the applicable regulations is a necessary prerequisite to eligibility for benefits *(see Matter of Paterson [Commissioner of Labor],*14 AD3d 751, 752 [2005]; *Matter of Prieto [Commissioner of Labor],*255 AD2d 859, 860 [1998]). Whether a claimant has demonstrated good cause to excuse any noncompliance with the registration regulations is a question for the Board to resolve *(see Matter of Larkin [Commissioner of Labor],*12 AD3d 829, 830 [2004]; *Matter of Brady [Commissioner of Labor],*5 AD3d 838, 839 [2004]). Here, although claimant contends that he misunderstood the information in the unemployment insurance information handbook as to how to proceed with reopening his original claim for benefits, the record establishes that claimant did not promptly contact the local unemployment insurance office to inquire about the status of his request to reopen his original claim despite not receiving any benefits checks. Under these circumstances, we find that there is substantial evidence to support the Board’s decision and it will not be disturbed *(see Matter of Collier [Commissioner of Labor],*19 AD 3d 792, 793 [2005]; *Matter of Lang*
      *817
      *[Commissioner of Labor],*9 AD3d 648, 649 [2004]; *Matter of Chen [Commissioner of Labor],*307 AD2d 580 [2003]).

Peters, J.P., Spain, Carpinello, Mugglin and Rose, JJ, concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.