alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IB

Union Calendar No. 317

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 182

[Report No. 104–634]

Disapproving the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (most-favorednation treatment) to the products of the People’s Republic of China.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 13, 1996

Mr. ROHRABACHER (for himself, Mr. SOLOMON, Mr. GILMAN, Ms. PELOSI,

Mr. COX of California, Mr. WOLF, Mr. LANTOS, Mr. HUNTER, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. FAZIO of

California, Mr. TRAFICANT, Mr. DORNAN, Mr. FUNDERBURK, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. BUNNING of Kentucky, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. SCARBOROUGH, Mr.

DIAZ-BALART, Mr. ROSE, Mr. STOCKMAN, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Ms. ROSLEHTINEN, Ms. MCKINNEY, Mr. STEARNS, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. STARK,

Mrs. SCHROEDER, Mr. EVANS, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. MILLER of California,

Mr. BAKER of California, and Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts) introduced

the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on

Ways and Means

JUNE 25, 1996

Additional sponsors: Mr. SPRATT, Mr. HALL of Ohio, Mr. DELLUMS, and Mr.

ENGEL

Deleted sponsor: Mr. FAZIO of California (added June 13, 1996; deleted June

18, 1996)

JUNE 25, 1996

Reported adversely from the Committee on Ways and Means, committed to

the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
2

•HJ 182 RH

JOINT RESOLUTION

Disapproving the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment

(most-favored-nation treatment) to the products of the

People’s Republic of China.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the Congress does not approve the extension of the

4 authority contained in section 402(c) of the Trade Act of

5 1974 recommended by the President to the Congress on

6 May 31, 1996, with respect to the People’s Republic of

7 China.

Union Calendar No. 317

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 182

[Report No. 104–634]

JOINT RESOLUTION

Disapproving the extension of nondiscriminatory

products of the People’s Republic of China.treatment (most-favored-nation treatment) to the

JUNE 25, 1996

Reported adversely from the Committee on Ways and

printedHouse on the State of the Union, and ordered to beMeans, committed to the Committee of the Whole
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph W. Aveni, Appellant.

[804 NYS2d 275]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated May 10, 2004 *(People v Aveni,*7 AD3d 632 [2004]), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered March 15, 2002.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see *Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Crane, J.P., S. Miller, Ritter and Rivera, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1052 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1052

    To amend the Clean Air Act to repeal the reformulated gasoline 
  provisions and the provisions relating to work-related vehicle trip 
                   reduction, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 24, 1995

Mr. Neumann (for himself, Mr. Sensenbrenner, and Mr. Petri) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Clean Air Act to repeal the reformulated gasoline 
  provisions and the provisions relating to work-related vehicle trip 
                   reduction, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF CERTAIN CLEAN AIR PROVISIONS.

    (a) Reformulated Gasoline.--Section 211(k) of the Clean Air Act 
(relating to reformulated gasoline) is hereby repealed.
    (b) Employee Trip Reduction.--Section 182(d)(1)(B) of such Act is 
repealed and section 108(f)(1)(A) of such Act is amended by striking 
clause (iii).
                                 <all>
```
#### Shared Communications Services of ESR, Inc., Appellant, v Goldman Sachs & Co., Respondent.

[803 NYS2d 512]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard B. Lowe, III, J.), entered November 4, 2004, dismissing the complaint, unanimously modified, on the law, the cause of action for tortious interference with contract reinstated, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered November 1, 2004, which granted defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 to dismiss the complaint, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.

*163The substantive law of New York applies to the analysis of plaintiffs claims on defendant’s motion to dismiss. Plaintiff clearly and unambiguously argued in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, on its application to have this case remanded to state Supreme Court, that its complaint only alleged causes of action arising under state law, and thus New York law was properly applied *(see American Fuel Corp. v Utah Energy Dev. Co., Inc., 122*F3d 130, 134 [2d Cir 1997]).

The claim for tortious interference with prospective business relations failed to include the necessary allegation that defendant’s conduct was motivated solely by malice or to inflict injury by unlawful means, beyond mere self-interest or other economic considerations *(see Prestige Foods v Whale Sec. Co.,*243 AD2d 281, 282 [1997]). On the other hand, the allegations of tortious interference with contract set forth a cognizable claim, for which malice is not a necessary element *(see Lama Holding Co. v Smith Barney,*88 NY2d 413, 424 [1996]; *Snyder v Sony Music Entertainment,*252 AD2d 294, 299 [1999]). Finally, civil conspiracy is not recognized as an independent tort in this State *(see Bell v Alden Owners,*299 AD2d 207, 209 [2002], *lv denied*100 NY2d 506 [2003]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Tom, Mazzarelli, Marlow and Catterson, JJ.
Exhibit 11.0


                    SLADE'S FERRY BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
                      COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                                 (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                            Three months ended             Nine months ended
                                               September 30,                 September 30,
                                         -------------------------------------------------------
                                            2003           2002           2003           2002
                                         -------------------------------------------------------


                                      <c>            <c>            <c>            <c>
Net Income                               $  699,345     $1,250,997     $1,616,861     $2,089,673
                                         -------------------------------------------------------
Average shares outstanding                3,976,557      3,917,902      3,963,167      3,900,580
                                         -------------------------------------------------------
Basic earnings per share                 $     0.18     $     0.32     $     0.40     $     0.54
                                         -------------------------------------------------------

Net Income                               $  699,345     $1,250,997     $1,616,861     $2,089,673
                                         -------------------------------------------------------
Average shares outstanding                3,976,557      3,917,902      3,963,167      3,900,580
Net effect of dilutive stock options         46,247         26,679         31,344         29,180
                                         -------------------------------------------------------
Adjusted shares outstanding               4,022,804      3,944,581      3,994,511      3,929,760
                                         -------------------------------------------------------
Diluted earnings per share               $     0.17     $     0.32     $     0.41     $     0.53
                                         -------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>


<PAGE>  29
Video: Multiflume runoff eve nt August 1, 1990 This video is available at the following website: http://www.tucson.ars.ag.gov/unit/WGWebcam/WalnutGulchWebcam.htm . The direct link to the video is: http://www.tucson.ars.ag.gov/unit/Movies/Aug_1_1990_with_animation.wmv . This document can also be viewed at the USEPA Docket Center, Public Readi ng Room. Address: USEPA West, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Room 3334, Washington, DC 20004. Telephone: 202 - 566 - 1744; Email: docket - customerservice@epa.gov.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**Certification of Principal ExecutiveOfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

** **

In connection with theQuarterly  Report on Form 10-Q ofMerit Medical Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31,2009 (the “Report”), I, Fred P. Lampropoulos, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of myknowledge:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: May  8, 2009 |   | /s/ Fred P.  Lampropoulos                                             |
|-------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                    |   | Fred P. Lampropoulos                                                  |
|                    |   | President and Chief  Executive Officer  (principal executive officer) |

 

This certificationaccompanies the foregoing Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 andshall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, bedeemed filed by the Registrant for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  A signed original of thiscertification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by theCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

 

----
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

** **

Reference is herebymade to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1,2016, by and among Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., as Depositor, Wells FargoBank, National Association, as Master Servicer, LNR Partners, LLC as SpecialServicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator,Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee and Park Bridge LenderServices LLC, as Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer withrespect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2016-C30 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 of theAgreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Servicesdo hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of theactivities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2017through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance perthe Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best ofmy knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all ofits obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February2018.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive VicePresident 

Wells Fargo Bank

 

  

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 10, 2017

No. 04-17-00400-CR, 04-17-00401-CR, 04-17-00402-CR, 04-17-00403-CR, 04-17-00404-CR

Logan FIELD,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 5810, 5811, 5812, 5813 & 5814

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant filed his notice of appeal on May 8, 2017. On June 28, 2017, we notified the 

trial court clerk that the clerk’s record was late, and to either file a Notification of Late Record 

within ten days or the clerk’s record within thirty days. To date, neither the clerk’s record nor a 

Notification of Late Record has been filed. 

It is therefore ORDERED that the trial court clerk file the record in this court no later 

than August 30, 2017. If the record is not received by such date, an order may issue directing 

Jan Davis to appear and show cause why she should not be held in contempt for failing to file the 

record. The clerk of this court is instructed to cause a copy of this order to be served on Ms. 

Davis by certified mail, return receipt requested, with delivery restricted to addressee only, or to 

give other personal notice of this order with proof of delivery.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of August, 2017.
___________________________________

Luz Estrada

Chief Deputy Clerk
In the Senate of the United States,

December 21, 1995.

Resolved, That the resolution from the House of Representatives (H.J. Res. 132) entitled ‘‘Joint resolution affirming that budget negotiations shall be based on the most recent technical and economic assumptions of the Congressional

Budget Office and shall achieve a balanced budget by fiscal

year 2002 based on those assumptions’’ do pass with the following

AMENDMENT:

Amend the preamble as follows:

1 Page 2, line 2, strike out øOffice¿ and insert: Office,

2 and the President and the Congress agree that the balanced

3 budget must protect future generations, ensure medicare sol4 vency, reform welfare, and provide adequate funding for

5 medicaid, education, agriculture, national defense, veterans,

6 and the environment. Further, the balanced budget shall

7 adopt tax policies to help working families and to stimulate

8 future economic growth

Attest:

Secretary.
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. Res. 132

AMENDMENT
! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 !
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 "
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 #
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 $
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 %
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 &
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 '
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 (
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 )
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 !
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 "
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 #
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 $
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 %
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 &
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 '
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 (
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 ! )
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 ! 
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 ! !
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 ! "
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 ! #
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 ! $
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 ! %
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 ! &
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 ! '
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 ! (
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 " )
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 " 
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 " !
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 " "
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 " #
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 " $
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 " %
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 " &
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 " '
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 " (
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 # )
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 # 
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 # !
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 # "
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 # #
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 # $
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 # %
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 # &
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 # '
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 # (
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 $ )
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 $ 

3 0 , *( )0 3 06 2 6 7 6 8 9 0 )7
 ! "# $ & '( )*+ , - . / 01 20 3 4 0 ) 5 ! . 5 ! 5 $ !

: 0' ;< =0 > ? & @ A > B > ? @C D E B > A E F B @ G @ B B H C > ? &

B H E H ? ? > B D D I J ? H E D E I ? & K L ! K H B M / @ A J > ? > ? /

? @C D E & F H N F / / D F H M & ? H H O I D / @D P P > / @? G D E > N H
# L_2019203EN.01000101.xml

| 1.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 203/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 203/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2019/1288

of 25 July 2019

entering a name in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed ‘Rögös túró’ (TSG)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Hungary's application to register the name ‘Rögös túró’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Hungary's application to register the name ‘Rögös túró’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Rögös túró’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Rögös túró’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Rögös túró’ (TSG) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.3 — Cheeses, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 July 2019.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 111, 25.3.2019, p. 5.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
# C_2020165EN.01003201.xml

| 13.5.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.5.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/32

---

Corrigendum to statement of revenue and expenditure of the European GNSS Agency for the financial year 2019 – amending budget No 1

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 107 of 31 March 2020
  )

(2020/C 165/08)

On the last page of the table of content:

for:

‘Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European GNSS Agency for the financial year 2019 – amending budget No 1’,

read:

‘Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European GNSS Agency for the financial year 2020 – amending budget No 1’.

On page 262, title:

for:

‘Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European GNSS Agency for the financial year 2019 – amending budget No 1’,

read:

‘Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European GNSS Agency for the financial year 2020 – amending budget No 1’.

---
§ 44.4403-1 Daily record. Every person liable for tax under section 4401 shall keep such records as will clearly show as to each day's operations: ( a ) The gross amount of all wagers accepted;
( b ) The gross amount of each class or type of wager accepted on each separate event, contest, or other wagering medium. For example, in the case of wagers accepted on a horse race, the daily record shall show separately the gross amount of each class or type of wagers (straight bets, parlays, “if” bets, etc.) accepted on each horse in the race. Similarly, in the case of the numbers game, the daily record shall show the gross amount of each class or type of wager accepted on each number.
For additional provisions relating to records, see section 6001 and § 44.6001-1.