alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 1

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution

of the United States.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission

9 to the States for ratification:
2

•HJ 1 EH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE—

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. Total outlays for any fiscal year shall

3 not exceed total receipts for that fiscal year, unless three4 fifths of the whole number of each House of Congress shall

5 provide by law for a specific excess of outlays over receipts

6 by a rollcall vote.

7 ‘‘SECTION 2. The limit on the debt of the United

8 States held by the public shall not be increased, unless

9 three-fifths of the whole number of each House shall pro10 vide by law for such an increase by a rollcall vote.

11 ‘‘SECTION 3. Prior to each fiscal year, the President

12 shall transmit to the Congress a proposed budget for the

13 United States Government for that fiscal year in which

14 total outlays do not exceed total receipts.

15 ‘‘SECTION 4. No bill to increase revenue shall become

16 law unless approved by a majority of the whole number

17 of each House by a rollcall vote.

18 ‘‘SECTION 5. The Congress may waive the provisions

19 of this article for any fiscal year in which a declaration

20 of war is in effect. The provisions of this article may be

21 waived for any fiscal year in which the United States is

22 engaged in military conflict which causes an imminent and

23 serious military threat to national security and is so de24 clared by a joint resolution, adopted by a majority of the

25 whole number of each House, which becomes law.
3

•HJ 1 EH

1 ‘‘SECTION 6. The Congress shall enforce and imple2 ment this article by appropriate legislation, which may rely

3 on estimates of outlays and receipts.

4 ‘‘SECTION 7. Total receipts shall include all receipts

5 of the United States Government except those derived

6 from borrowing. Total outlays shall include all outlays of

7 the United States Government except for those for repay8 ment of debt principal.

9 ‘‘SECTION 8. This article shall take effect beginning

10 with fiscal year 2002 or with the second fiscal year begin11 ning after its ratification, whichever is later.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives January 26,

1995.

Attest:

Clerk.
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 1

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the

Constitution of the United States.
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1114

AN ACT

To authorize minors who are under the child labor

tute design safety standards.appropriate American National Standards Instimaterials into balers and compacters that meet1938 and who are under 18 years of age to loadprovisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1114

AN ACT

To authorize minors who are under the child labor provisions

of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 and who are

under 18 years of age to load materials into balers

and compacters that meet appropriate American National

Standards Institute design safety standards.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1114 EH

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR 16 AND 17 YEAR OLDS TO

2 LOAD MATERIALS INTO SCRAP PAPER

3 BALERS AND PAPER BOX COMPACTORS.

4 (a) GENERAL RULE.—In the administration and en5 forcement of the child labor provisions of the Fair Labor

6 Standards Act of 1938, employees who are 16 and 17

7 years of age shall be permitted to load materials, but not

8 operate or unload materials, into scrap paper balers and

9 paper box compactors—

10 (1) that are safe for 16 and 17 year old em11 ployees loading the scrap paper balers or paper box

12 compactors, and

13 (2) that cannot operate while being loaded.

14 (b) DEFINITION.—For purposes of subsection (a),

15 scrap paper balers and paper box compactors shall be con16 sidered safe for 16 or 17 year old employees to load only

17 if—

18 (1) such scrap paper balers and paper box com19 pactors are in compliance with the current safety

20 standard established by the American National

21 Standards Institute;

22 (2) such scrap paper balers and paper box com23 pactors include an on-off switch incorporating a key24 lock or other system and the control of such system

25 is maintained in the custody of employees who are

26 18 years of age or older;
3

•HR 1114 EH

1 (3) the on-off switch of such scrap paper balers

2 and paper box compactors is maintained in an off

3 condition when such scrap paper balers and paper

4 box compactors are not in operation; and

5 (4) the employer of 16 and 17 year old employ6 ees provides notice, and posts a notice, on such

7 scrap paper balers and paper box compactors stating

8 that—

9 (A) such scrap paper balers and paper box

10 compactors meet the current safety standard

11 established by the American National Stand12 ards Institute;

13 (B) 16 and 17 year old employees may

14 only load such scrap paper balers and paper

15 box compactors; and

16 (C) any employee under the age of 18 may

17 not operate or unload such scrap paper balers

18 and paper box compactors.
4

•HR 1114 EH

1 SEC. 2. CONSTRUCTION.

2 Section 1 is not to be construed as affecting the ex3 emption for apprentices and student learners published at

4 29 Code of Federal Regulations 570.63.

Passed the House of Representatives October 24,

1995.

Attest:

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS NINE MONTH YEAR TO DATE SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM AMERICAN BIOGENETIC SCIENCES, INC. 2000 10-Q FOR THE THIRD
QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       2,083,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  340,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    562,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,000
<PP&E>                                       2,346,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,919,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,170,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          483,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        44,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,630,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,170,000
<SALES>                                      1,211,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,853,000
<CGS>                                          447,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  447,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               940,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,529,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,529,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,529,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.12)



</TABLE>
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 51

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress concerning

ment, and stability in the Baltic region.economic development, environmental improve-
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 51

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Whereas from 1945 to the early 1990’s Kaliningrad was

2 a Russian military outpost consisting of as many as

3 200,000 Russian military personnel concentrated in

4 an area of 15,000 square kilometers and Kaliningrad

5 has suffered substantial environmental damage as a

6 result of this military presence;
2

•HCON 51 EH

1 Whereas since this time the number of Russian military

2 personnel in Kaliningrad has declined significantly, al3 though the number of such personnel in the region

4 is still substantial;

5 Whereas polls conducted by the Kaliningrad Sociological

6 Center have shown that over 60 percent of the

7 Kaliningrad public favors development of Kaliningrad

8 as an economic bridge between Europe and Russia;

9 Whereas establishment of Kaliningrad as a free economic

10 zone by the Russian Government in 1994 represents

11 a positive step toward Kaliningrad’s integration into

12 the Baltic and European economies and toward giving

13 Kaliningrad an opportunity to flourish economically

14 and to contribute substantially to the well-being of the

15 Baltic region; and

16 Whereas Russian economic analysts at the Russian For17 eign Policy Foundation have noted that militarization

18 of Kaliningrad ‘‘corresponded neither to the needs of

19 the population of the region itself, nor to the neces20 sities of its economic development’’: Now, therefore,

21 be it

22 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

23 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

24 (1) Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia have the

25 right to self-determination which extends to the con-
3

•HCON 51 EH

1 duct of their foreign policy regarding membership in

2 the North Atlantic Treaty Organization;

3 (2) development of the Kaliningrad region as a

4 free trade zone will help ensure the freedom and fu5 ture prosperity and stability of the Baltic region;

6 and

7 (3) continued military reductions in and envi8 ronmental restoration of the Kaliningrad region will

9 greatly facilitate economic development and prosper10 ity in Kaliningrad.

Passed the House of Representatives September 26,

1996.

Attest:

Clerk.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1025

To rescind the Federal implementation plan promulgated by the Administrator

of the Environmental Protection Agency for the South Coast, Ventura,

and Sacramento areas of California.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 23, 1995

Mr. BILBRAY (for himself, Mr. KIM, Mr. MOORHEAD, Mr. DREIER, Mr.

CUNNINGHAM, Mr. PACKARD, Mr. COX of California, Mr. ROHRABACHER,

Mr. DORNAN, Mr. ROYCE, Mr. MCKEON, Mr. THOMAS, Mr. BAKER of

California, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. HERGER, Mr. RADANOVICH, Mr. BONO,

Mr. RIGGS, Mr. GALLEGLY, Mr. CALVERT, Mrs. SEASTRAND, Mr. HORN,

Mr. POMBO, Mr. LEWIS of California, and Mr. HUNTER) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To rescind the Federal implementation plan promulgated

by the Administrator of the Environmental Protection

Agency for the South Coast, Ventura, and Sacramento

areas of California.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FEDERAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR CER4 TAIN AREAS IN CALIFORNIA.

5 (a) CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS.—The Congress finds

6 that the 1990 amendments to the Clean Air Act (Public
2

•HR 1025 IH

1 Law 101–549) superseded prior requirements of the Clean

2 Air Act regarding the demonstration of attainment of na3 tional ambient air quality standards and eliminated the

4 obligation of the Administrator of the Environmental Pro5 tection Agency to promulgate a Federal implementation

6 plan under section 110(c) of the Clean Air Act for the

7 South Coast, Ventura, or Sacramento areas of California.

8 (b) EFFECT OF FIP.—Upon the enactment of this

9 Act, any Federal implementation plan that has been pro10 mulgated by the Administrator of the Environmental Pro11 tection Agency under the Clean Air Act for the South

12 Coast, Ventura, or Sacramento areas of California pursu13 ant to a court order or settlement agreement shall be re14 scinded and shall have no further force and effect.

Æ
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-20640

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

GERMAN DUQUE,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:90-CR-424-2

Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

German Duque, federal prisoner # 54991-079, appeals the district court’s

summary denial of his challenge to the validity of his indictment, filed pursuant

to FED. R. CRIM. P. 12(b)(3)(B). Duque filed this motion after his conviction was

affirmed on appeal and the expiration of the time for seeking certiorari. Because

the criminal proceedings were no longer pending, this motion was unauthorized

and without a jurisdictional basis. See United States v. Early, 27 F.3d 140, 142

(5th Cir. 1994). Because Duque was not challenging his sentence, his motion

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

May 28, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 09-20640 Document: 00511125131 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/28/2010
No. 09-20640

2

could not be construed as arising under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 or FED. R. CRIM. P. 35.

Moreover, it cannot be construed as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set

aside, or correct his sentence because Duque has already filed one § 2255 motion

that was addressed on the merits and a new motion would be subject to the

jurisdictional bar of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A). See United States v. Key, 205 F.3d

773, 774 (5th Cir. 2000).

Duque has thus “appealed from the denial of a meaningless, unauthorized

motion.” Early, 27 F.3d at 142. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court

denying relief on Duque’s motion is AFFIRMED. See id.

Case: 09-20640 Document: 00511125131 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/28/2010
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 108

To modify the provision of law which provides a permanent appropriation

for the compensation of Members of Congress, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. BILIRAKIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Rules and, in addition, to the Committee on Appropriations for

a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for

consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To modify the provision of law which provides a permanent

appropriation for the compensation of Members of Congress, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Congressional Pay For

5 Performance Act’’.
2

•HR 108 IH

1 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF PERMANENT APPROPRIATION

2 FOR MEMBERS’ PAY.

3 Subsection (c) of section 130 of the joint resolution

4 entitled ‘‘Joint resolution making continuing appropria5 tions for the fiscal year 1982, and for other purposes’’

6 (Public Law 97–51; 2 U.S.C. 31 note) is amended by

7 striking out ‘‘Effective’’ and by inserting ‘‘(1) Except to

8 the extent provided by paragraph (2), effective’’ and by

9 inserting at the end the following new paragraph:

10 ‘‘(2) If Congress has not passed all general appro11 priation bills before the beginning of a fiscal year, then

12 the appropriation contained in paragraph (1) shall not be

13 effective with respect to such fiscal year.’’.

14 SEC. 3. CONSIDERATION OF THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH AP15 PROPRIATION.

16 It shall not be in order in either the House of Rep17 resentatives or the Senate to consider the general appro18 priation bill making appropriations for the legislative

19 branch for any fiscal year unless and until other general

20 appropriation bills for such fiscal year have been presented

21 to the President for signature under section 7 of Article

22 I of the Constitution.

Æ
**Exhibit 35.12**

OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE 

I, Karen Montbach, aManaging Director of Citibank, N.A. (the “Company”), hereby certify, with respect to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2016 (the “Agreement”), by and among Citigroup Commercial Mortgage SecuritiesInc., as depositor, Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association, as master servicer, LNR Partners, LLC, as special servicer, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as operating advisor, Citibank, N.A., as certificate administrator(the “Certificate Administrator”), and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, the following: 

1.     A review of the Company’s activities as Certificate Administrator during the reporting period endingDecember 31, 2016 and its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision. 

2.    To the bestof my knowledge, based on such review, as of and for the reporting period ending December 31, 2016, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period. 

This statement is given by the undersigned as an authorized officer of the Company and not in the undersigned’s individual capacity. 

Date: February 27, 2017
EX 35.22

 

| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. 

1585 BROADWAY

NEW YORK, New York 10036-8200

 

Re:          Annual Statement of Compliance for Morgan Stanley Capital I Trust 2016-UBS12,Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2016-UBS12

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of December 1, 2016 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a)      A review of Wells Fargo's activities during theReporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made undersuch officer's supervision; and

 

(b)     To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, WellsFargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all materialrespects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

  

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 138 Introduced in House (IH)]

  2d Session
H. J. RES. 138

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1996, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 1996

Mr. Obey introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1996, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That section 106(c) of Public 
Law 104-56 is amended by striking ``December 15, 1995'' and inserting 
``January 12, 1996''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Krupp Government Income Trust II (the
"Trust") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alan
Reese, Chief Accounting Officer of the Trust, certify, pursuant to U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Trust as of March 31, 2003 (the last date of
                  the period covered by the Report).


  /s/ Alan Reese
---------------------------------
Alan Reese,
Chief Accounting Officer