alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
THIRD
                                  AMENDMENT TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


         This Third  Amendment (the  "Amendment") is made and entered into as of
the 29th day of September, 1998 by and between WorldPort Communications, Inc., a
Delaware  corporation  ("WorldPort" or the "Company") and Mr. Phillip S. Magiera
("Executive") and amends that certain  Employment  Agreement dated as of January
1, 1998 between the Company and Executive (the "Employment Agreement").

         WHEREAS,  the parties executed an Amendment to Employment  Agreement as
of March 31, 1998 (the "First  Amendment")  which  amended  Section  6(f) of the
Employment  Agreement and executed a Second Amendment to Employment Agreement as
of April 1, 1998 (the "Second  Amendment")  which amended Section 6(a) and again
amended Section 6(f) of the Employment Agreement;

          WHEREAS, the parties desire to further amend a portion of Section 6(f)
of the Employment Agreement;

         NOW  THEREFORE,  for good and valuable  consideration,  the receipt and
sufficiency  of  which is  hereby  acknowledged,  the  parties  hereto  agree as
follows:

         1. The third sentence of Section 6(f) of the  Employment  Agreement (as
amended by the First  Amendment and the Second  Amendment) is hereby amended and
restated to read in its entirety as follows:

                  "The  promissory  note shall accrue interest at an annual rate
         of 9% and  mature on August 1,  2000,  at which  time all  payments  of
         principal and accrued interest shall be made."

         2. Except as otherwise amended hereby,  all terms and provisions of the
Employment  Agreement,  as amended  previously  shall continue in full force and
effect as stated therein. All capitalized terms used by not defined herein shall
have the meanings given in the Employment Agreement

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the parties have executed this Agreement as of the
day and year first above written.

                                                WORLDPORT COMMUNICATIONS, INC.


                                                By:
                                                Name:
                                                Title:



                                                Phillip S. Magiera
# Journal officiel C 33A/15 f

| | ISSN 1725-2431 |
| --- | --- |
| Journal officiel
  de l'Union européenne | C 33A |
| | |
| Édition de langue française | Communications et informations | 50e année15 février 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2431

Journal officiel

de l'Union européenne

C 33A

Édition de langue française

Communications et informations

50e année15 février 2007

---

| Numéro d'information | Sommaire | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| 2007/C 033A/01 | Avis au lecteur | 1 |

Numéro d'information

Sommaire

page

2007/C 033A/01

Avis au lecteur

1

| | Rectificatifs |
| --- | --- |
| 2007/C 033A/02 | Rectificatif à la liste de réserve du concours général EPSO/AD/43/06 — Juristes linguistes (AD7) de langue bulgare (JO C 22 A du 31.1.2007) | 3 |

Rectificatifs

2007/C 033A/02

Rectificatif à la liste de réserve du concours général EPSO/AD/43/06 — Juristes linguistes (AD7) de langue bulgare (JO C 22 A du 31.1.2007)

3

| FR | |
| --- | --- |

FR

---

15.2.2007

| 15.2.2007 | FR | Journal officiel de l'Union européenne | CA 33/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

FR

Journal officiel de l'Union européenne

CA 33/1

---

AVIS AU LECTEUR

Image

---

Rectificatifs

| 15.2.2007 | FR | Journal officiel de l'Union européenne | CA 33/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2007

FR

Journal officiel de l'Union européenne

CA 33/3

---

Rectificatif à la liste de réserve du concours général EPSO/AD/43/06 — Juristes linguistes (AD7) de langue bulgare

(
  «Journal officiel de l'Union européenne» C 22 A du 31 janvier 2007
  )

(2007/C 33 A/01)

La liste de réserve du concours général EPSO/AD/43/06 — Juristes linguistes (AD7) de langue bulgare, filière «Cour de justice», se lit comme suit:

LISTE DE RÉSERVE
   (1)

CONCOURS GÉNÉRAL EPSO/AD/43/06

JURISTES LINGUISTES (AD7)

DE LANGUE BULGARE (BG)

Filière «Cour de justice»

| ABADHJIEVA | STANISLAVA |
| --- | --- |
| ALEXOVA | SIMONA |
| ANGUELOVA | ANTONIA |
| BOYADJIEVA | NEDIALKA |
| GEORGIEVA | TANJA |
| GROZEV | ROSSEN |
| GUEORGIEVA | DEANA |
| HADJIYSKA | NEVYANA |
| KALINOV | ANGEL |
| KOLEVA | KATERINA |
| MITREV | GEORGI |
| OBAYDI | SIVIYA |
| PARVANOV | PETRE |
| RADEVA | DIANA |

ABADHJIEVA

STANISLAVA

ALEXOVA

SIMONA

ANGUELOVA

ANTONIA

BOYADJIEVA

NEDIALKA

GEORGIEVA

TANJA

GROZEV

ROSSEN

GUEORGIEVA

DEANA

HADJIYSKA

NEVYANA

KALINOV

ANGEL

KOLEVA

KATERINA

MITREV

GEORGI

OBAYDI

SIVIYA

PARVANOV

PETRE

RADEVA

DIANA

---

(1)  À la demande expresse d'un lauréat, son nom n'est pas publié.

1

---
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2016, by andamong WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS LLC, asSpecial Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as CertificateAdministrator, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee  andTRIMONT REAL ESTATE ADVISORS, LLC, as Operating Advisor and as AssetRepresentations Reviewer with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates Series 2016-C37 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized termsused herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in theAgreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.            A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period fromDecember 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the “ReportingPeriod”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period hasbeen made under my supervision, and 

 

2.            To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

  

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day ofFebruary 2017.

 

 

/s/Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President                       

Wells Fargo Bank 

 

  

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by T.D. 9359, 72 FR 54544, Sept. 26, 2007.

§ 10.29 Conflicting interests. ( a ) Except as provided by paragraph (b) of this section, a practitioner shall not represent a client before the Internal Revenue Service if the representation involves a conflict of interest. A conflict of interest exists if— ( 1 ) The representation of one client will be directly adverse to another client; or
( 2 ) There is a significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be materially limited by the practitioner's responsibilities to another client, a former client or a third person, or by a personal interest of the practitioner.
( b ) Notwithstanding the existence of a conflict of interest under paragraph (a) of this section, the practitioner may represent a client if— ( 1 ) The practitioner reasonably believes that the practitioner will be able to provide competent and diligent representation to each affected client;
( 2 ) The representation is not prohibited by law; and
( 3 ) Each affected client waives the conflict of interest and gives informed consent, confirmed in writing by each affected client, at the time the existence of the conflict of interest is known by the practitioner. The confirmation may be made within a reasonable period after the informed consent, but in no event later than 30 days.
( c ) Copies of the written consents must be retained by the practitioner for at least 36 months from the date of the conclusion of the representation of the affected clients, and the written consents must be provided to any officer or employee of the Internal Revenue Service on request.
( d ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section is applicable on September 26, 2007.
[T.D. 9359, 72 FR 54549, Sept. 26, 2007]
#### § 48.0-1 Introduction.

The regulations in this part 48 are designated “Manufacturers and Retailers Excise Tax Regulations.” The regulations relate to the excise taxes imposed by chapter 31 and 32 of the Internal Revenue Code. Chapter 31 (relating to retail taxes) imposes tax on certain luxury items, special fuels, fuel used in commercial transportation on inland waterways, and heavy trucks and trailers. Chapter 32 (relating to manufacturers taxes) imposes tax on gas guzzler automobiles, highway-type tires, taxable fuel, aviation fuel, coal, certain vaccines, sporting goods, and taxable medical devices. Although chapter 32 also imposes a tax on firearms, this tax is under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms. See part 40 of this chapter for regulations relating to returns, payments, and deposits of taxes imposed by chapters 31 and 32 (other than the tax on firearms imposed by section 4181).

[T.D. 8442, 57 FR 48186, Oct. 22, 1992, as amended by T.D. 8659, 61 FR 10453, Mar. 14, 1996; T.D. 9604, 77 FR 72934, Dec. 7, 2012]
www.gpo.gov

### §1141. Distribution of funds; attorney's fees and expenses

The funds on deposit in the Treasury of the United States to the credit of the Emigrant New York Indians that were appropriated by the Act of May 29, 1967 (81 Stat. 50), to pay a judgment by the Indian Claims Commission in Docket Numbered 75, and the interest thereon, after payment of attorney fees and expenses, shall be distributed as determined in sections 1144 and 1145 of this title.

(Pub. L. 90–93, §1, Sept. 27, 1967, 81 Stat. 229.)

#### References in Text

Act of May 29, 1967, referred to in text, is act May 29, 1967, Pub. L. 90–21, 81 Stat. 50. That portion of the act which appropriated the funds referred to was not classified to the Code.

The Indian Claims Commission, referred to in text, terminated Sept. 30, 1978. See Codification note set out under former section 70 et seq. of this title.
DENY Nunc Pro Tunc ; and Opinion Filed December 16 , 2013. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 01443

- CV

IN RE THOMAS J. ELLIS , Relator
Original Proceeding from the 101st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 1010227


### MEMORANDUM OPINION N UNC PRO TUNC Before Justices O'Neill, Lang

- Miers, and Evans Opinion by Justice O'Neill Relator contends the trial judge erred in gr anting summary judgment. The facts and
issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record
before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 52.8(a); Walke r v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 839

- 40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding).
Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

131443F.P05 /Michael J. O'Neill/ MICHAEL J. O'NEILL JUSTICE
§ 19.855 Who has the burden of proof in a debarment action? ( a ) We have the burden to prove that a cause for debarment exists.
( b ) Once a cause for debarment is established, you as a respondent have the burden of demonstrating to the satisfaction of the debarring official that you are presently responsible and that debarment is not necessary.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1149

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for the nonrecognition of gain on the sale of a principal residence if the taxpayer is

unemployed.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 7, 1995

Mr. LAZIO of New York (for himself, Ms. MOLINARI, Mr. FORBES, Mr. TRAFICANT, Mr. KING, Mr. FOX, of Pennsylvania, Mr. PACKARD, Mr. SAXTON,

Mr. ACKERMAN, Mrs. MALONEY, Ms. LOFGREN, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr.

SERRANO, Mr. ENGLISH of Pennsylvania, and Mr. MCCRERY) introduced

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and

Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

for the nonrecognition of gain on the sale of a principal

residence if the taxpayer is unemployed.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. NONRECOGNITION OF GAIN ON SALE OF PRIN4 CIPAL RESIDENCE IF TAXPAYER IS UNEM5 PLOYED.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (d) of section 121 of

7 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to one-time
2

•HR 1149 IH

1 exclusion of gain from sale of principal residence by indi2 vidual who has attained age 55) is amended by adding

3 at the end the following new paragraph:

4 ‘‘(10) SPECIAL RULES FOR RESIDENCE SOLD

5 DURING PERIOD OF UNEMPLOYMENT.—

6 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a)(1)

7 shall not apply to the sale or exchange of any

8 residence during a period while the taxpayer or

9 the taxpayer’s spouse is unemployed.

10 ‘‘(B) DETERMINATION OF UNEMPLOY11 MENT.—For purposes of subparagraph (A), an

12 individual shall be treated as unemployed dur13 ing any period—

14 ‘‘(i) for which such individual is re15 ceiving unemployment compensation (as

16 defined in section 85(b)), or

17 ‘‘(ii) for which such individual would

18 have been entitled to receive unemployment

19 compensation (as so defined) but for—

20 ‘‘(I) the termination of the period

21 during which such compensation was

22 payable, or

23 ‘‘(II) an exhaustion of such indi24 vidual’s rights to such compensation.
3

•HR 1149 IH

1 ‘‘(C) REDUCTION IN MAXIMUM EXCLU2 SION.—In the case of a sale or exchange of any

3 residence to which subparagraph (A) applies,

4 the amount of the gain excluded from gross in5 come under subsection (a) shall not exceed the

6 excess (if any) of—

7 ‘‘(i) the applicable dollar amount con8 tained in subsection (b)(1), over

9 ‘‘(ii) the aggregate amount of gain ex10 cluded from gross income under subsection

11 (a) with respect to all prior sales and ex12 changes (other than a sale or exchange

13 which is not taken into account by reason

14 of subsection (b)(3)).

15 ‘‘(D) ADDITIONAL ELECTION.—Any elec16 tion under this section with respect to any resi17 dence to which subparagraph (A) applies shall

18 not be taken into account in determining

19 whether any other election may be made under

20 this section.’’

21 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

22 this section shall apply to sales and exchanges after the

23 date of the enactment of this Act in taxable years ending

24 after such date.

Æ
AARON COREY DAVIS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-4596

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 7, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

J. Bradford Stetson, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Danielle Jorden, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Samuel B. Steinberg, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, SWANSON, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-02-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-01-1997
<CASH>                                          30,147
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,580
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    616,713
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               686,469
<PP&E>                                         709,248
<DEPRECIATION>                                 228,723
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,174,682
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          652,200
<BONDS>                                        293,990
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           169
<OTHER-SE>                                   (237,637)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,174,682
<SALES>                                      1,686,645
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,686,645
<CGS>                                        1,233,288
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,233,288
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               509,603
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,884
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (89,130)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (89,430)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (89,430)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (5.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (5.29)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1176 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1176

  To nullify an executive order that prohibits Federal contracts with 
   companies that hire permanent replacements for striking employees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 1995

Mr. Goodling (for himself, Mr. Fawell, Mr. Ballenger, Mr. Hoekstra, Mr. 
  Cunningham, Mr. McKeon, Mrs. Roukema, Mr. Gunderson, Mr. Barrett of 
Nebraska, Mr. Castle, Mrs. Meyers of Kansas, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, 
Mr. Greenwood, Mr. Hutchinson, Mr. Knollenberg, Mr. Graham, Mr. Weldon 
 of Florida, Mr. Funderburk, Mr. Souder, Mr. Norwood, Mr. Boehner, Mr. 
 Stenholm, Mr. Dooley, Mr. Parker, Mr. Deal of Georgia, Mr. Brewster, 
Mr. Hancock, Mr. Zeliff, Mr. Rohrabacher, and Mr. Ewing) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Economic and 
                       Educational Opportunities

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To nullify an executive order that prohibits Federal contracts with 
   companies that hire permanent replacements for striking employees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NULLIFICATION OF ORDER.

    Any executive order, or other rule or order, that prohibits Federal 
contracts with, or requires the debarment of, or imposes other sanction 
on, a contractor on the basis that such contractor or organizational 
unit thereof has permanently replaced lawfully striking workers shall 
have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
§ 16.26 Form, filing and service of papers. ( a ) *Form.* ( 1 ) Documents filed with the ALJ shall include an original and two copies.
( 2 ) Every pleading and paper filed in the proceeding shall contain a caption setting forth the title of the action, the case number assigned by the ALJ, and a designation of the paper (e.g., motion to quash subpoena).
( 3 ) Every pleading and paper shall be signed by, and shall contain the address and telephone number of the party or the person on whose behalf the paper was filed, or his or her representative.
( 4 ) Papers are considered filed when they are mailed. Date of mailing may be etablished by a certificate from the party or its representative or by proof that the document was sent by certified or registered mail.
( b ) *Service.* A party filing a document with the ALJ shall, at the time of filing, serve a copy of such document on every other party. Service upon any party of any document other than the complaint or notice of hearing shall be made by delivering or mailing a copy to the party's last known address. When a party is represented by an attorney, service shall be made upon such representative in lieu of the actual party.
( c ) *Proof of service.* A certificate of the individual serving the document by personal delivery or by mail, setting forth the manner of service, shall be proof of service.
# L_2019154EN.01003401.xml

| 12.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 154/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 154/34

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2019/954

of 22 May 2019

conferring protection under Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the name ‘La Jaraba’ (PDO)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1), and in particular Article 99 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | In accordance with Article 97(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the Commission has examined the application to register the name ‘La Jaraba’ sent by Spain and has published it in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In accordance with Article 97(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the Commission has examined the application to register the name ‘La Jaraba’ sent by Spain and has published it in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | No statement of objection has been received by the Commission under Article 98 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

No statement of objection has been received by the Commission under Article 98 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.

| (3) | In accordance with Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the name ‘La Jaraba’ should be protected and entered in the register referred to in Article 104 of that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In accordance with Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the name ‘La Jaraba’ should be protected and entered in the register referred to in Article 104 of that Regulation.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘La Jaraba’ (PDO) is hereby protected.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 May 2019.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 57, 13.2.2019, p. 5.

2

---
#### § 5c.44F-1 Leases and qualified research expenses.

For purposes of section 44F(b)(2)(A)(iii), the determination of whether any amount is paid or incurred to another person for the right to use personal property in the conduct of qualified research shall be made without regard to the characterization of the transaction as a lease under section 168(f)(8). See § 5c.168(f)(8)-1(b).