### 26515 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 85 / Tuesday, May 3, 2016 / Proposed Rules

crossing over the Micaville, Bakersville, Huntdale (southeastern corner), and Burnsville maps, then back onto the Huntdale map and continuing along the Mitchell/Yancy County line, crossing onto the Chestoa map, to the intersection of the Mitchell/Yancey County line with the Mitchell/Unicoi County line, which is concurrent with the Tennessee/North Carolina State line; then

(34) Proceed northeasterly along the Mitchell/Unicoi County line, crossing back over the Huntsdale (northwestern corner) map and onto the Unicoi map, and returning to the beginning point.

Signed: April 25, 2016. Mary G. Ryan, Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2016–10291 Filed 5–2–16; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4810–31–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**40 CFR Part 52**

**[EPA–R04–OAR–2015–0839; FRL–9945–89– Region 4]** 

**Determination of Attainment; Atlanta, Georgia; 2008 Ozone National Ambient**  **Air Quality Standards**

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency.

**ACTION :**  Proposed rule.

**SUMMARY :**  The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to determine that the Atlanta, Georgia, 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) Moderate Nonattainment Area (‘‘Atlanta Area’’ or the ‘‘Area’’) has attained the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. This proposed determination is based upon complete, quality-assured, and certified ambient air monitoring data showing that the Area has monitored attainment of the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS for the 2013–2015 monitoring period. If EPA finalizes this proposed action, the requirement for this Area to submit an attainment demonstration and associated reasonably available control measures (RACM), reasonable further progress (RFP) plans, contingency measures, and other planning state implementation plans (SIPs) related to attainment of the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS will be suspended until EPA redesignates the Area to attainment, approves a redesignation substitute, or determines that the Area has violated the 2008 8- hour ozone NAAQS. This proposed attainment determination does not constitute a redesignation to attainment. The Atlanta Area will remain in nonattainment status for the 2008 8- hour ozone NAAQS until such time as the State requests a redesignation to attainment and EPA determines that the Atlanta Area meets the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) requirements for redesignation, including an approved maintenance plan.

**DATES :**  Comments must be received on or before June 2, 2016.

**ADDRESSES :**  Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04– OAR–2015–0839, at http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ commenting-epa-dockets.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Jane Spann, Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Ms. Spann can be reached via phone at (404) 562–9029 or via electronic mail at spann.jane@epa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  I. Background

On March 12, 2008, EPA revised both the primary and secondary NAAQS for ozone to a level of 0.075 parts per million (ppm) (annual fourth-highest daily maximum 8-hour average concentration, averaged over three years) to provide increased protection of public health and the environment. See 73 FR 16436 (March 27, 2008). The 2008 ozone NAAQS retains the same general form and averaging time as the 0.08 ppm NAAQS set in 1997, but is set at a more protective level. Effective July 20, 2012, EPA designated any area that was violating the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS based on the three most recent years (2008–2010) of air monitoring data as a nonattainment area. See 77 FR 30088 (May 21, 2012). The Atlanta Area, consisting of Bartow, Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, Coweta, DeKalb, Douglas, Fayette, Forsyth, Fulton, Gwinnett, Henry, Newton, Paulding, and Rockdale counties, was designated as a marginal ozone nonattainment area. See 40 CFR 81.311. Areas that were designated as marginal ozone nonattainment areas were required to attain the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS no later than July 20, 2015, based on 2012–2014 monitoring data. The Atlanta Area did not attain the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS by July 20, 2015, and therefore on April 11, 2016, the EPA Administrator signed a final rule reclassifying the Atlanta Area from a marginal nonattainment area to a moderate nonattainment area for the2008 8-hour ozone standard. A prepublication version of the final rule can be found at EPA’s Web site at: https:// www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/ 2016-04/documents/20160411fr.pdf. Moderate areas are required to attain the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS by no later than July 20, 2018, six years after the effective date of the initial nonattainment designations. See 40 CFR 51.1103. Air quality monitoring data from the 2013–2015 monitoring period show that the Atlanta Area is now attaining the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS.

Under the provisions of EPA’s ozone implementation rule for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS (40 CFR part 51, subpart AA), if EPA issues a determination that an area is attaining the relevant standard, also known as a Clean Data Determination, the area’s obligations to submit an attainment demonstration and associated RACM, RFP, contingency measures, and other planning SIPs related to attainment of the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS are suspended until EPA: (i) Redesignates the area to attainment for the standard or approves a redesignation substitute, at which time those requirements no longer apply; or (ii) EPA determines that the area has violated the standard, at which time the area is again required to submit such plans. See 40 CFR 51.1118. While these requirements are suspended, EPA is not precluded from acting upon these elements at any time if submitted to EPA for review and approval.

An attainment determination is not equivalent to a redesignation under section 107(d)(3) of the CAA. The designation status of the Atlanta Area will remain nonattainment for the 2008


### 26516 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 85 / Tuesday, May 3, 2016 / Proposed Rules

8-hour ozone NAAQS until such time as EPA determines that the Area meets the CAA requirements for redesignation to attainment, including an approved maintenance plan, and redesignates the Area. Additionally, the determination of attainment is separate from, and does not influence or otherwise affect, any future designation determination or requirements for the Atlanta Area based on any new or revised ozone NAAQS, and the determination of attainment remains in effect regardless of whether EPA designates this Area as a nonattainment area for purposes of any new or revised ozone NAAQS. II. EPA’s Analysis

The 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS are met at a monitor when the 3-year average of the annual fourth-highest daily maximum 8-hour average ozone concentrations at the ozone monitor is less than or equal to 0.075 ppm based on complete, consecutive calendar years of certified, quality-assured ambient air monitoring data. See 40 CFR 50.15; 40 CFR part 50, appendix P. This 3-year average is referred to as the design value. When the design value is less than or equal to 0.075 ppm at each monitor within the area, then the area is attaining the NAAQS. Also, the data completeness requirement is met when the average percent of days with valid ambient monitoring data is greater than or equal to 90 percent, and no single year has less than 75 percent data completeness as determined in 40 CFR part 50, appendix P. The data must be collected and quality-assured in accordance with 40 CFR part 58 and recorded in the EPA Air Quality System (AQS).

EPA has reviewed the complete, quality-assured, and certified ozone ambient air monitoring data for the 2013–2015 monitoring period for the Atlanta Area. The design values for each monitor for this period are less than or equal to 0.075 ppm, and all of the monitors meet the data completeness requirements ( see Table 1, below). Based on this data and consistent with the requirements contained in 40 CFR part 50, EPA has preliminarily concluded that this Area has attained the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS.



### TABLE 

### 1—ATLANTA 

### A REA 

### 4TH 

### H IGHEST 

### D AILY 

### M AXIMUM 

### OZONE 

### 8-H OUR 

### AVERAGES AND 

### 8-H OUR 

### OZONE 

### D ESIGN 

### VALUES FOR 

### 2013–2015

County Monitor ID 4th Highest daily maximum value Design value (2013–2015) 2013 2014 2015

Cobb ..................................................................................... 130670003 67 * 63 66 * 65 Coweta ................................................................................. 130770002 53 67 66 62 Dawson ................................................................................ 130850001 63 66 63 64 DeKalb ................................................................................. 130890002 62 70 71 67 Douglas ................................................................................ 130970004 63 65 70 66 Fulton ................................................................................... 131210055 69 73 77 73 Gwinnett ............................................................................... 131350002 69 68 71 69 Henry .................................................................................... 131510002 70 75 70 71 Paulding ............................................................................... 132230003 62 59 65 62 Pike ...................................................................................... 132319991 64 66 68 66 Rockdale .............................................................................. 132470001 71 79 68 72

* Georgia temporarily shut down the monitor during a portion of the 2014 monitoring season due to construction at the National Guard Depot.

The data in Table 1 are taken from EPA’s AQS database, available at: https://www.epa.gov/aqs. The AQS report with this data is available in the docket for this rulemaking.
III. Proposed Action

EPA is proposing to determine that the Atlanta Area has attained the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. This proposed determination is based upon complete, quality assured, and certified ambient air monitoring data showing that the Atlanta Area has monitored attainment of the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS for the 2013–2015 monitoring period. If EPA finalizes this proposal, the requirement for this Area to submit an attainment demonstration and associated RACM, a RFP plan, contingency measures, and other planning SIPs related to attainment of the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS will be suspended until EPA redesignates the Area to attainment, approves a redesignation substitute, or determines that the Area has violated the standard. IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

This proposed attainment determination would, if finalized, result in the suspension of certain federal requirements and would not impose any additional requirements. For that reason, this proposed action:

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);

• Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. );

• Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. );

• Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); • Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);

• Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);

• Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);

• Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and

• Will not have disproportionate human health or environmental effects under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000) and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law


### 26517 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 85 / Tuesday, May 3, 2016 / Proposed Rules

because it merely makes a determination based on air quality data. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: April 20, 2016. Heather McTeer Toney, Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2016–10167 Filed 5–2–16; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION**

**46 CFR Part 502**

**[Docket No. 16–08]**

**RIN 3072–AC64**

**Rules of Practice and Procedure; Presentation of Evidence in**  **Commission Proceedings**

**AGENCY :**  Federal Maritime Commission.

**ACTION :**  Notice of proposed rulemaking. **SUMMARY :**  The Federal Maritime Commission is proposing to reorganize several subparts of its Rules of Practice and Procedure and revise its rules regarding presentation of evidence in Commission proceedings.

**DATES :**  Submit comments on or before July 5, 2016.

**ADDRESSES :**  You may submit comments, identified by the docket number in the heading of this document, by any of the following methods:

• Email: secretary@fmc.gov. Include in the subject line: ‘‘Docket No. 16–08, Commenter/Company Name.’’ Comments should be attached to theemail as a Microsoft Word or textsearchable PDF document. Comments containing confidential information should not be submitted by email.

• Mail: Karen V. Gregory, Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, 800 North Capitol Street NW., Washington, DC 20573–0001.

• Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to: http:// www.fmc.gov/16-08.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Karen V. Gregory, Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, 800 North Capitol Street NW., Washington, DC 20573–0001, Phone: (202) 523–5725, Email: secretary@fmc.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  The Commission is proposing to update or reorganize several subparts of 46 CFR part 502, its Rules of Practice and Procedure, and to substantively revise the subpart regarding how hearings are conducted to improve guidance concerning the presentation of evidence in Commission proceedings. Certain current rules would also be removed to clarify current practice and eliminate duplication.
Reorganization of Part 502

Part 502 sets out the rules governing procedure in all types of Commission proceedings. However, after years of revisions, some users find the grouping and ordering of the subparts confusing. The Commission proposes to reorder and rename certain subparts to better reflect the chronology of a typical adjudication, and to distinguish other types of proceedings, as enumerated in this table:

Current 46 CFR part 502 Proposed New 46 CFR part 502 Revisions

Subpart A, General Information ......................... ...................................................................... Redesignate § 502.141 as § 502.14. Subpart E, Proceedings; Pleadings; Motions;

Replies. Subpart E, Private Complaints and Commission Investigations. Separate subpart E in to subparts E and F,relocate and regroup rules within both subparts. Subpart F, Settlement; Prehearing Procedure ... Subpart F, Petitions, Exemptions and Orders to Show Cause. Separate subpart E in to subparts E and F,relocate and regroup rules within both subparts.Subpart J, Hearings; Presiding Officers; Evidence. Subpart L, Presentation of Evidence ............... Revise several sections and relocate all (see Table below). Subpart K, Shortened Procedure ....................... Subpart K [Reserved] ...................................... Remove subpart K in its entirety. Subpart L, Disclosures and Discovery ............... Subpart J, Disclosures and Discovery ............. Relocate and redesignate al l rules to subpart J.Subpart M, Briefs; Requests for Findings; Decisions; Exceptions. Subpart M; Decisions, Appeals, Exceptions .... Relocate § 502.153, remove § 502.222 and retitle.

Subpart A

In subpart A several cross references would be corrected and current § 502.141 that establishes the Commission may hold hearings that are not part of an adjudicatory process, would be moved to this subpart as general information and retitled. Subpart D

Cross references are corrected in subpart D. Subpart E

Subpart E, currently ‘‘Proceedings, Pleading, Motions, Replies’’ would apply only to adjudications of private complaints and Commission investigations and would be renamed ‘‘Private Complaints and Commission Investigations.’’ Revised subpart E would contain the procedures for institution of those proceedings, motions practice, opportunity for settlement, and other related rules. Section 502.61 which opens the subpart would be revised by moving and amending a rule on notice of hearings from subpart J.
Subpart F

Current subpart F addresses Settlement and Prehearing Procedure. Inasmuch as those subject areas are part of the process in adjudicatory proceedings, they would be divided and moved into subpart E and a revised subpart L governing presentation of evidence. Subpart F would be revised to apply to proceedings other than private complaints and Commission investigations, titled: ‘‘Petitions, Exemptions, and Orders to Show Cause.’’ These types of proceedings are generally distinct from complaint and investigation proceedings. With clear headings, the proposed rules are intended to be easier for the user to locate. Revised subpart F would encompass current §§ 502.73 through
502.77. Subparts J, and L

The Commission proposes changes to subpart J, ‘‘Hearings; Presiding Officers; Evidence’’, and subpart L, ‘‘Disclosure and Discovery’’ to more logically and chronologically group the processes