alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Blackhawk Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, R.
Richard Bastian, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ R. Richard Bastian III
----------------------------------------
R. Richard Bastian, III
President and Chief Executive Officer
August 5, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Blackhawk Bancorp, Inc. and will
be retained by Blackhawk Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.7326-1 Disposal of forfeited or abandoned property in special cases. ( a ) *Coin-operated gaming devices.* For regulations relating to the disposal of coin-operated gaming devices, see § 172.65 of this chapter (Disposition of Seized Personal Property).
( b ) *Narcotics.* For regulations relating to the disposal of forfeited narcotic drugs, see 21 CFR 302.56. For the disposal of forfeited marihuana, see 26 CFR (1939) 152.99 and 152.100 (Regulations under the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937, as amended).
( c ) *Firearms.* For regulations relating to the disposal of forfeited firearms or ammunition, see § 178.166 of this chapter (Commerce in Firearms and Ammunition), and § 179.182 of this chapter (Machine Guns, Destructive Devices, and Certain Other Firearms).
[32 FR 15241, Nov. 3, 1967, as amended by T.D. 7188, 37 FR 12796, June 29, 1972]
Incentive Awards Amendment 10.2






TFS Financial Corporation                                EXHIBIT 10.2
2008 Equity Incentive Plan
First Amendment to Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement


THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into effective this [____] day of [_______________], 2012, by and between [_____________] (“Participant”) and TFS Financial Corporation, a Federal corporation (the “Company”), pursuant to the provisions of the TFS Financial Corporation 2008 Equity Incentive Plan.


W I T N E S S E T H:


WHEREAS, the Company and Participant are party to that certain Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement, effective as of May 12, 2009 (the “Agreement”); and


WHEREAS, the Company and Participant desire to amend the Agreement as set forth herein.


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals, and of the premises, covenants, terms and conditions contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:


1.Terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement.
        
2.Section 3 of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


3.    Timing of Payout.  Payout of all vested RSUs shall occur as soon as administratively feasible following Participant's Termination of Service with the Company or its Subsidiaries, but in no event later than sixty (60) days after the effective date of termination; provided, however, that if the Participant is then a “Specified Employee” under Section 409A, the RSUs shall be paid out in accordance with Section 8.1(pp)(v) of the Plan.  Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, upon the vesting of any RSUs, the Company may, in its sole discretion, distribute Stock of the Company subject to vested RSUs to pay Federal Insurance Contributions Act (“FICA”) tax imposed under Section 3101, Section 3121(a) and Section 3121(v)(2) on the vesting of RSUs and to pay income tax at source on wages imposed under Section 3401 or the corresponding provisions of applicable state, local, or foreign tax laws as a result of the payment of the FICA amount and, pursuant to Section 13(c) of this Agreement, the Company may retain such Stock to satisfy the minimum amount of such required tax withholding.


3.This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which will constitute an original and all of which together will constitute one agreement.  The signature page of any individual or entity, or copies or facsimiles thereof, may be appended to any counterpart of this Amendment and when so appended will constitute an original.


4.Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, all terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect and are unmodified hereby.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed or caused this Amendment to be executed as of the day and year first above written.





















TFS Financial Corporation




By:                     
Name:                     
Title:                    
                                            


                                            
[_________________]
#### § 1020.314 Structured transactions.

Refer to § 1010.314 of this chapter for rules regarding structured transactions for banks.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 30, 2009

d1217 

# Order

December 30, 2009

139601

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139601 COA: 282100 Oakland CC: 2006-212089-FH ANTHONY KEITH WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 6, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

K ELLY 

### , C.J., would grant leave to appeal.
Exhibit 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of NELX,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB  for the  period  ended  August 31,  2004 (the  "Report")  filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission,  I, John M. Jacobs, Chief Executive Officer
and Principal Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Company's  Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



         October 20, 2004                         /s/ John M. Jacobs
                                                    --------------------------
                                                    John M. Jacobs
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                                    Principal Financial Officer
#### § 1021.640 [Reserved]
§ 19.945 Excluded or exclusion. *Excluded or exclusion* means— ( a ) That a person or commodity is prohibited from being a participant in covered transactions, whether the person has been suspended; debarred; proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4; voluntarily excluded; or
( b ) The act of excluding a person.
(Superior Court of Cincinnati,

1901.)

#### JACOB ELLIN MOSES v. MARIENTHAL et al.

(1) A contract of sale which does not specify the number or amount of the articles to be sold and bought, or from which such cannot be ascertained to a reasonable degree of certainty is void.

(2) A contract of sale for “about” 500 of a certain article means 500 of the articles.

(3) Where a custom of trade is relied on it should be pleaded.

Dempsey. , J.

The petition avers, in substance, that by a contract between plaintiff, and defendants plaintiff agreed to deliver, and defendants agreed to accept, the following articles:— “about 500 huffhides, *is*— io^c; *2s*— 9^jc; 1 calfskins 13c; *2s*— iiyí; 1 kips 10J2C; *2s*— 9c

That the price was as indicated in the foregoing agreement; that plaintiff on a certain day, in accordance with the agreement, was able, ready and willing to deliver 69 No. 1, calf skins; 20 No. 2, calf skins; 13 No. 1 kips; 5 No. 2 kips; 158 No. 1, huffhides, and 200 No. 2 huffhides, but that defendants without cause refused to accept the same or any part thereof, to plaintiff’s damage in the sum of $106.02, for which he asks judgment. Defendants demur. Treating the alleged contract as one, several in its nature, without passing upon the point, the stipulations as to calf skins and kips violate the rule of certainty as to subject matter which is applicable to all contracts. There must be certainty as to the subí ect matter of the contract; in other words, the subject matter of the agreement must be expressed by the parties in such terms that it can be ascertained to a reasonable degree of certainty, — and in sales, or contracts to sell, the thing sold or to be sold, is a part of the element of the subject matter. And in agreements of the character of the one at bar, the obligation must be certain, or capable bf *405'being made certain, in regard to the quantity which the merchant agrees to sell, or the vendee agrees to buy. Ashcroft v. Butterworth, 136 Mass., 511 — at 514. No quantity is stipulated here; hence the vendee has not bound himself to accept any specified, nor has the vendor bound himself to deliver any quantity. As to the huffhides, passing the question .as to how they should be distributed and tendered as to No. i’s, and No. 2’s, the petition shows that altogether but 358 were offered. The contract calls for about 500. Under the rules laid down in Brawley v. Wright, 115 U. S., 188, and followed in 89 Fed., 907, the plaintiff was bound to tender 500 hides, or what would be substantially 500. The addition of the word “about’ is only “for the purpose of providing against accidental variations, arising from slight and unimportant excesses or •deficiencies in number, measure or weight.” See, Benjamin on Sales (7th Ed.) 713.

F. Seinsheimer, for plaintiff.

Edw. Barton, for defendants.

The question as to “custom” made in plaintiff’s brief is not raised by the record; customs must be pleaded in order to be brought to the .attention, of the court.

Demurrer sustained.
§ 129.3 Reporting requirements. ( a ) Notice of specific reporting requirements, including who is required to report, the information to be reported, the manner of reporting, and the time and place of filing reports, will be published by the Secretary of the Treasury in the Federal Register prior to the implementation of each survey or study.
( b ) Written responses are required from all reporters.
( c ) Information required from reporters shall be furnished under oath.
§ 58.6061-1 Signing of returns and other documents. ( a ) *In general.* Any stock repurchase excise tax return (as defined in § 58.6011-1(b)), statement, or other document required to be made with respect to the tax imposed by chapter 37 of the Internal Revenue Code must be signed by the person required to file the return, statement, or other document, or by the persons required or duly authorized to sign in accordance with the regulations, forms, or instructions prescribed with respect to such return, statement, or document. An individual's signature on such a return, statement, or other document is prima facie evidence that the individual is authorized to sign the return, statement, or other document.
( b ) *Applicability date.* This section applies to stock repurchase excise tax returns, statements, or other documents that are required to be made with respect to the tax imposed by chapter 37 and required to be filed after June 28, 2024, and during taxable years ending after June 28, 2024.
# L_2020038EN.01003901.xml

| 11.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 38/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 38/39

---

Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/907 of 14 March 2019 establishing a Common Training Test for ski instructors under Article 49b of Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the recognition of the professional qualifications

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 145 of 4 June 2019
  )

On page 11, in Annex I:

for:

| ‘Denmark | Euro Ski Pro | Den Danske Skiskole’ |
| --- | --- | --- |

‘Denmark

Euro Ski Pro

Den Danske Skiskole’

read:

| ‘Denmark | Professional Ski Instructor | Den Danske Skiskole’ |
| --- | --- | --- |

‘Denmark

Professional Ski Instructor

Den Danske Skiskole’

On page 12, in Annex I:

for:

| ‘Hungary | Síoktató **** | Síktatók Magyarországi Szövetsége’ |
| --- | --- | --- |

‘Hungary

Síoktató ****

Síktatók Magyarországi Szövetsége’

read:

| ‘Hungary | Síoktató **** | Síoktatók Magyarországi
  Szövetsége’ |
| --- | --- | --- |

‘Hungary

Síoktató ****

Síoktatók Magyarországi

Szövetsége’

---
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Poolingand Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2016, by and among WELLS FARGOCOMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as SpecialServicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator,WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, and PARK BRIDGE LENDERSERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and as Asset Representations Reviewer withrespect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2016-BNK1 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 of thisAgreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Servicesdo hereby certify that:

 

1.       Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.       To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasexecuted this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells  Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
§ 19.310 What must I do if a Federal agency excludes a person with whom I am already doing business in a covered transaction? ( a ) You as a participant may continue covered transactions with an excluded person if the transactions were in existence when the agency excluded the person. However, you are not required to continue the transactions, and you may consider termination. You should make a decision about whether to terminate and the type of termination action, if any, only after a thorough review to ensure that the action is proper and appropriate.
( b ) You may not renew or extend covered transactions (other than no-cost time extensions) with any excluded person, unless the Department of the Treasury grants an exception under § 19.120.
#### § 1024.300 General.

Mutual funds are subject to the reporting requirements set forth and cross referenced in this subpart. Mutual funds should also refer to subpart C of part 1010 of this chapter for reporting requirements contained in that subpart which apply to mutual funds.
# FILED
November 6, 1997 Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Cou rt Clerk IN THE COURT OF CR IMINAL A PPEALS OF TENN ESSEE AT NASHVILLE MAY 1997 SESSION

STATE OF TENN ESSEE, ) ) C.C.A. No. 01C01-9604-CC-00151 Appellee, ) ) Dickson County V. ) ) Honorable Leo nard W. Martin, Judge ) DOROTHY SHELDON, ) (Forgery) ) Appellant. )

OPINION CO NCURRING IN RESULTS
I concur in the result r

eached by the majority. I write separately however because I have reached the conc lusion that venue is proper in this case through a somewhat different rationale than that expressed in the majori ty opinion.
The indictment in the instant case provides: The Grand Jurors for the State of Tennessee , duly elected, impaneled, sworn, and charged to i nquire in and for the body o f the County of Dickson, in the State aforesai d, upon their oaths, present: Than DOROTHY SHELTON, A/K/A VIRGINIA SHELDON, A/K/A DOROTHY SPANN, A/K/A VICTORIA SPANN , heretofore, to-wit; on or about the 10th day of August, 1993, and prior to the finding of this Indictment, in the County of Dickson aforesaid, then and there unlawfully, and with intent to defraud Tennessee Credit Corporat ion, Renee Reeves, Agent and Victoria D. Spann of the sum of nine hundred seventy ($970.00) dollars, did forge and make, without t he authorization of the said Tennes see Credit Corporation, Ren ee Reeves, Agent and Vict oria D. Spann, a certain paper writi ng, to-wit: a Retai l Installment Contract and Security Agreement, so that the said paper writing purported to bear the signature of the said Victoria D. Spann as drawer, in viol ation of T.C.A. 39-14-114, all of which is agai nst the peace and dignity of the State of Tennessee. Thus, Appellant was charg ed with “ making ” forged documents to wit: a retail sales contract and a securi ty agreement. The proof show ed that those document were prepared in Dickson County based on false informat ion submitted by Appellant-2-

who later signed the do cuments in Humphreys County . The majority concludes t hat the clerk at

Leader Furn iture Compan y who fill ed out the cr

edit applic

ation became the unwitting agent of Appe llant, and that it was t hrough this agent that the mental element of forgery was co mmitted in Dickson County . In my view how ever, the making of the documents in Dickson Count y by an innocent agent based on the false information submitted by Appel lant constituted part of the actus reus of the offense as charged in the indictment , and this action is sufficient to establish venue in Dickson County.

For these reasons I concur in the result reached by the Court.

____________________________________ JERRY L. SMITH, JUD GE
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 203

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 203

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That, in consonance with section 132(a) of

3 the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946, when the

4 House adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, August

5 1, 1996, Friday, August 2, 1996, or Saturday, August 3,
2

•HCON 203 EH

1 1996, pursuant to a motion made by the Majority Leader

2 or his designee, it stand adjourned until noon on Wednes3 day, September 4, 1996, or until noon on the second day

4 after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to sec5 tion 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first;

6 and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close

7 of business on Thursday, August 1, 1996, Friday, August

8 2, 1996, Saturday, August 3, 1996, or Sunday, August

9 4, 1996, pursuant to a motion made by the Majority Lead10 er or his designee in accordance with this resolution, it

11 stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Tuesday, Sep12 tember 3, 1996, or until such time on that day as may

13 be specified by the Majority Leader or his designee in the

14 motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second

15 day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to

16 section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs

17 first.

18 SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority

19 Leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with

20 the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority Lead21 er of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House
3

•HCON 203 EH

1 and Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in their

2 opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Passed the House of Representatives July 26, 1996.

Attest:

Clerk.
www.gpo.gov

### §1707. Purchase and transfer of private settlement lands

#### (a) Determination by Secretary; assignment of settlement lands to State Corporation

When the Secretary determines that the State Corporation described in section 1706(a) of this title has been created and will accept the settlement lands, the Secretary shall exercise within sixty days the options entered into pursuant to section 1704 of this title and assign the private settlement lands thereby purchased to the State Corporation.

#### (b) Moneys remaining in fund

Any moneys remaining in the fund established by section 1703 of this title after the purchase described in subsection (a) of this section shall be returned to the general Treasury of the United States.

#### (c) Duties and liabilities of United States upon discharge of Secretary's duties; restriction on conveyance of settlement lands; affect on easements for public or private purposes

Upon the discharge of the Secretary's duties under sections 1704, 1705, 1706, and 1707 of this title, the United States shall have no further duties or liabilities under this subchapter with respect to the Indian Corporation or its successor, the State Corporation, or the settlement lands: *Provided, however*, That if the Secretary subsequently acknowledges the existence of the Narragansett Tribe of Indians, then the settlement lands may not be sold, granted, or otherwise conveyed or leased to anyone other than the Indian Corporation, and no such disposition of the settlement lands shall be of any validity in law or equity, unless the same is approved by the Secretary pursuant to regulations adopted by him for that purpose: *Provided, however*, That nothing in this subchapter shall affect or otherwise impair the ability of the State Corporation to grant or otherwise convey (including any involuntary conveyance by means of eminent domain or condemnation proceedings) any easement for public or private purposes pursuant to the laws of the State of Rhode Island.

(Pub. L. 95–395, §8, Sept. 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 816.)