alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

Memo 

To: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0799 

From: Joseph McDonald, U.S. EPA-OTAQ-ASD 

CC: Ed Nam, U.S. EPA-OTAQ-ASD 

Date: October 6, 2010 

Re: Technical Papers on Advanced Gasoline Engines 

Hard copies of technical papers on advanced gasoline engines are available within EPA’s Docket 

Center. The specific citations are: 

• Yi., J., Wooldridge, S., Coulson, G., Hilditch, J., Iyer, C., Moilanen, P., Papaioannou, G., 

Reiche, D., Shelby, M. VanDerWege, B., Wearver, C., Xu, Z., Davis, D., Hinds, B., Schamel, 

A. "Development and Optimization of the Ford 3.5L V6 EcoBoost Combustion System," SAE 

Technical Paper Series, No. 2009-01-1494. 

• Turner, J.W.G., Pearson, R.J., Curtis, R. Holland, B. "Sabre: a cost effective engine technology 

combination for high efficiency, high performance and low CO2 emissions," Low Carbon 

Vehicles 2009: Institution of Mechanical Engineers conference proceedings, May 2009. 

• Lumsden, G. OudeNijeweme, D., Fraser, N., Blaxill, H. "Development of a Turbocharged 

Direct Injection Downsizing Demonstrator Engine," SAE Technical Paper Series, No. 2009-01-

1503, 2009. 

• Kirwan, J.E., Shost, M., Zizelman, J. "3-Cylinder Turbocharged Gasoline Direct Injection: A 

High Value Solution for Low CO2 and Low NOx Emissions," SAE Technical Paper Series, No. 

2010-01-0590, 2010. 

• Kaiser, M., Krueger, U., Harris, R., Cruff, L. "Doing More with Less - The Fuel Economy 

Benefits of Cooled EGR on a Direct Injected Spark Ignited Boosted Engine," SAE Technical 

Paper Series, No. 2010-01-0589. 

• Kapus, P.E., Fraidl, G.K., Prevedel, K., Fuerhapter, A. "GDI Turbo - The Next Steps," JSAE 

Technical Paper No. 20075355, 2007. 

• Cruff, L., Kaiser, M., Krause, S., Harris, R., Krueger, U., Williams, M. "EBDI - Application of a 

Fully Flexible High BMEP Downsized Spark Ignited Engine," SAE Technical Paper Series, No. 

2010-01-0587. 

• Taylor, J., Fraser, N., Wieske, P. "Water Cooled Exhaust Manifold and Full Load EGR 

Technology Applied to a Downsized Direct Injection Spark Ignition Engine," SAE Technical 

Paper Series, No. 2010-01-0356. 

The documents have been copyrighted and are not available within the electronic docket. Parties that 

wish to view hard copies of these documents can do so at the at the EPA Docket Center: Air and 

Radiation Docket and Information Center, EPA/DC, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., 
z Page 2 

NW, Washington DC. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-

1744, and the telephone number for the Air Docket is (202) 566-1742.
#### Leland H. CHIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART,* Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 01-16645.

D.C. No. CV-00-03105-TEH.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 10, 2002 **.

Decided June 18, 2002.

Before O’SCANNLAIN, BERZON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 Jo Anne B. Barnhart is substituted for her predecessor as Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

**

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

Leland H. Chin appeals the district court’s summary judgment upholding the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s decision denying him disability insurance benefits. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). We review de novo the district court’s decision, and we review for substantial evidence and legal error the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) decision. *Tackett v. Apfel,*180 F.3d 1094, 1097 (9th Cir.1999).

We conclude that substantial evidence supports the ALJ’s finding that Chin was not disabled. *See id.*at 1098.

We also conclude that although the ALJ improperly discredited Chin’s pain testimony based on his daily activities, *see Vertigan v. Halter,*260 F.3d 1044, 1049-50 (9th Cir.2001), there remains substantial evidence in the record supporting the ALJ’s decision, *see Tackett,*180 F.3d at 1097.

Chin’s remaining contentions lack merit.

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without **

oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

EH/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

DELORES ENOS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-10024

D.C. No. 2:07-cr-01222-NVW

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Neil V. Wake, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 17, 2009** 

Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

Delores Enos appeals from the district court’s order denying her motion to

modify a condition of probation that prohibits her from having contact with

FILED

DEC 14 2009

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
EH/Research 2 09-10024

children under the age of 13 without prior permission from the court. We have

jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Enos contends that the district court erred by declining to modify the

condition of probation because the condition is different from that to which the

parties stipulated in her Rule 11(c)(1)(C) plea agreement. The district court did not

err in denying Enos’ motion to modify the conditions of her probation. See 18

U.S.C. § 3563(c). 

AFFIRMED.
#### In the Matter of Derrick McM., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[808 NYS2d 106]

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (O’Donoghue, J.), dated December 17, 2004, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court, dated December 7, 2004, made after a hearing, finding that the appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of robbery in the second degree, robbery in the third degree, grand larceny in the fourth degree (two counts), criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, petit larceny, and attempted assault in the third degree, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent and placed him on probation for a period of 12 months. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order dated December 7, 2004.

Ordered that the order of disposition is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the fact-finding order is vacated, and the petition is dismissed.

*475To sustain a determination based upon accessorial liability, the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the presentment agency, must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused acted with the mental culpability necessary to commit the act charged and that, in furtherance thereof, he solicited, requested, commanded, importuned, or intentionally aided the principal to commit such act. Mere presence at the scene of the incident is insufficient to establish the appellant’s guilt as an accessory *(see Matter of Bianca*W., 267 AD2d 463 [1999]; *Matter of Peter J.,*184 AD2d 511, 512 [1992]; *cf. People v Sanchez,*167 AD2d 489, 491 [1990]; *People v Bennett,*160 AD2d 949, 950-951 [1990]). In this case, the presentment agency failed to adduce legally sufficient evidence that the appellant was anything more than a bystander at the scene of a robbery perpetrated by several other individuals. Notably, the complainant was unable to identify the appellant and the eyewitness was unable to attribute any culpable behavior to the appellant. Therefore, the dispositional order must be reversed, and the petition dismissed. Adams, J.P., Crane, S. Miller and Mastro, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Christopher Lathrop, Appellant.

[804 NYS2d 272]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Rosenwasser, J.), rendered May 6, 2004, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Adams, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein, Skelos and Dillon, JJ., concur.
www.gpo.gov

### §1742. Definitions

For purposes of this part—

(1) The term “Miccosukee Tribe” means the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida, a tribe of American Indians recognized by the United States and organized under section 476 of this title and recognized by the State of Florida pursuant to chapter 285, Florida Statutes.

(2) The term “State of Florida” means the State of Florida, its agencies, political subdivisions, constitutional officers, officials of its agencies and subdivisions, and the South Florida Water Management District.

(3) The term “Secretary” means the Secretary of the Interior.

(4) The term “lands or natural resources” means any real property or natural resources, or any interest in or right involving any real property or natural resources including but not limited to minerals and mineral rights, timber and timber rights, water and water rights, and rights to hunt and fish.

(5) The term “lawsuit” means the action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, entitled Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida against State of Florida, et al., Case No. 79–253–CIV–JWK.

(6) The term “Lease Agreement” means that perpetual lease granted by the State of Florida to the Miccosukee Tribe, involving a specifically described area in South Florida, title to which is held by the State of Florida and in which the Miccosukee Tribe is granted certain express rights and interests.

(7) The term “settlement funds” means those amounts of money which the State of Florida has agreed to pay to the Miccosukee Tribe under the Settlement Agreement in partial consideration for the settlement of the lawsuit and the extinguishment of rights to all potential or unsettled claims which the Miccosukee Tribe may have to lands or natural resources in the State of Florida.

(8) The term “Settlement Agreement” means those documents entitled “Settlement Agreement between the Miccosukee Tribe and the State of Florida” executed on April 16, 1982, by representatives of the State of Florida and representatives of the Miccosukee Tribe and filed with the secretary of state of the State of Florida which incorporate the Lease Agreement described in paragraph (6) of this section.

(9) The term “transfer” includes but is not limited to any sale, grant, lease, allotment, partition, or conveyance, any transaction the purpose of which was to effect a sale, grant, lease, allotment, partition, or conveyance, or any event or events that resulted in a change of possession or control of lands or natural resources.

(Pub. L. 97–399, §3, Dec. 31, 1982, 96 Stat. 2012.)
IA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 16

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating

to voluntary school prayer.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. EMERSON (for himself and Mr. HANSEN) introduced the following joint

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States relating to voluntary school prayer.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is hereby proposed as an amendment to the

5 Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to

6 all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution if rati7 fied by the legislatures of at least three-fourths of the sev-
2

HJ 16 IH

1 eral States within seven years from the date of its proposal

2 to the States by the Congress:

3 ‘‘ARTICLE—

4 ‘‘Nothing in this Constitution shall be construed to

5 prohibit individual or group prayer in public schools or

6 other public institutions. No person shall be required by

7 the United States or by any State to participate in prayer.

8 Neither the United States nor any State shall prescribe

9 the content of any such prayer.’’

Æ
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Motor vehicle use map. AshleyNational Forest, Utah. Vernal Ranger District East**
 
2013:Front | Back
2014:Front | Back
2016:Front | Back
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.28:AS 3/11/
Item Number:0080-G (online)
CGP systemNumber:000924147
 
January 4, 2018
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 158 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 158

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               March 27 (legislative day, March 26), 1996

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 To recognize the Peace Corps on the occasion of its 35th anniversary 
      and the Americans who have served as Peace Corps volunteers.

Whereas the Peace Corps has become a powerful symbol of America's commitment to 
        expand hope, create opportunity, and encourage development at the grass 
        roots level in the developing world;
Whereas more than 140,000 Americans have served as Peace Corps volunteers in 
        more than 125 countries in Africa, Asia and the Pacific, Central Asia, 
        Eastern and Central Europe, and the Western Hemisphere since 1961, and 
        have strengthened the ties of friendship and understanding between the 
        people of the United States and those of other countries;
Whereas Peace Corps volunteers have made significant and lasting contributions 
        around the world in agriculture, business development, education, the 
        environment, health, and youth development, and have improved the lives 
        of individuals and communities around the world;
Whereas Peace Corps volunteers, enriched by their experiences overseas, have 
        brought to their communities throughout the United States a deeper 
        understanding of other cultures and traditions;
Whereas Peace Corps volunteers embody and represent many of America's most 
        enduring values, such as service, commitment to the poor, and friendship 
        among nations;
Whereas the Peace Corps continues to receive broad, bipartisan support in 
        Congress and from the American people; and
Whereas March 1, 1996 will mark the 35th anniversary of the founding of the 
        Peace Corps: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the achievements and 
contributions of the Peace Corps over the past 35 years be celebrated; 
that the dedication and sacrifice of Peace Corps volunteers be 
recognized and their continued contributions be acknowledged not only 
for their service in other countries but in their own communities; and 
that the President is requested to honor Peace Corps volunteers and 
reaffirm our Nation's commitment to international peace and 
understanding.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 26, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1113

To suspend until January 1, 1998, the duty on Fluridone aquatic herbicide.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 2, 1995

Mr. BURTON of Indiana introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend until January 1, 1998, the duty on Fluridone

aquatic herbicide.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AQUATIC WEED CONTROL HERBICIDE.

4 Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tar5 iff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting

6 in numerical sequence the following new heading:

‘‘ 9902.31.12 1–methyl–3–phenyl–5–

(3–(trifluoro-methyl)

phenyl)–4(1H)–

pyridinone (Fluridone)

(provided for in subheading 2933.39.25) ...... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/97 ’’.
2

•HR 1113 IH

1 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 The amendment made by section 1 shall apply with

3 respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse

4 for consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date

5 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by T.D. 9359, 72 FR 54544, Sept. 26, 2007.

§ 10.78 Decision on review. ( a ) *Decision on review.* On appeal from or review of the decision of the Administrative Law Judge, the Secretary of the Treasury, or delegate, will make the agency decision. The Secretary of the Treasury, or delegate, should make the agency decision within 180 days after receipt of the appeal.
( b ) *Standard of review.* The decision of the Administrative Law Judge will not be reversed unless the appellant establishes that the decision is clearly erroneous in light of the evidence in the record and applicable law. Issues that are exclusively matters of law will be reviewed de novo. In the event that the Secretary of the Treasury, or delegate, determines that there are unresolved issues raised by the record, the case may be remanded to the Administrative Law Judge to elicit additional testimony or evidence.
( c ) *Copy of decision on review.* The Secretary of the Treasury, or delegate, will provide copies of the agency decision to the authorized representative of the Internal Revenue Service and the respondent or the respondent's authorized representative.
( d ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section is applicable beginning August 2, 2011.
[T.D. 9359, 72 FR 54555, Sept. 26, 2007, as amended by T.D. 9527, 76 FR 32310, June 3, 2011]
(logo) C-III | C-III AssetManagement

 

 

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

**C-III Asset Management LLC**

 

 

The undersigned, Barry Davis,President of C-III Asset Management LLC *(f/k/a Centerline Servicing LLC)*,the Special Servicer under that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement datedas of November 1, 2016, relating to the **Morgan Stanley Capital I Trust2016-BNK2, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-BKN2**(the“Pooling and Servicing Agreement”), hereby certifies as follows:

 

1.       areview of the activities of the Special Servicer and of its performance underthe Pooling and Servicing Agreement during the calendar year 2017 (the"Reporting Period") has been made under the undersigned'ssupervision;

 

2.       to thebest of the undersigned's knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicermaintained an effective internal control system relating to its servicing ofthe Mortgage Loans serviced by it and has fulfilled in all material respectsits obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement throughout theReporting Period.

 

Capitalized terms nototherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given them in the Pooling andServicing Agreement.

 

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, as of the 1st day of March, 2018, I havehereuntosigned my name.

 

 

/s/ Barry Davis

**Barry Davis**, President

C-III Asset Management LLC, a

Delaware limited liabilitycompany

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MSC 2016-BNK2
Exhibit 32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of HQ Sustainable Maritime Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Norbert Sporns, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002, to
the best of his knowledge, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 14, 2008



/s/ Norbert SpornsNorbert SpornsChief Executive Officer
www.gpo.gov

### §683. Payments not “other income and resources”

Payments made under sections 681 to 683 of this title shall not be held to be “other income and resources” as that term is used in sections 302(a)(7), 602(a)(7),1 and 1202(a)(8) of title 42.

(June 19, 1952, ch. 445, §3, 66 Stat. 140.)

#### References in Text

Section 602 of title 42, referred to in text, was repealed and a new section 602 enacted by Pub. L. 104–193, title I, §103(a)(1), Aug. 22, 1996, 110 Stat. 2112, and, as so enacted, subsec. (a)(7) no longer contains the term “other income and resources”.

#### Section Referred to in Other Sections

This section is referred to in section 682 of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.