alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Malik JARMON, Appellant.

No. 02-1667.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted June 18, 2002.

Filed June 21, 2002.

Before LOKEN, BYE, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Malik Jarmon appeals the sentence imposed by the district court1 upon his guilty plea to a drug offense. Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief challenging the harshness of Jarmon’s 70-month prison sentence. We affirm.

We will not entertain counsel’s argument because Jarmon entered into a plea agreement wherein he specifically agreed to the prison sentence he received. *See United States v. Nguyen,*46 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir.1995) (defendant who voluntarily exposes himself to specific sentence may not challenge that punishment on appeal). Further, Jarmon’s sentence was within the applicable and unobjected-to Guidelines range. *See United States v. Woodrum,*959 F.2d 100, 101 (8th Cir.1992) (per curiam) (sentence is not reviewable merely because it is at top of properly calculated Guidelines range).

Having reviewed the record independently pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues.

Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

1

. The Honorable Lyle E. Strom, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.
#### § 15.737-15 Reply to answer.

No reply to the respondent's answer shall be required, and new matter in the answer shall be deemed to be denied, but the Director may file a reply in his/her discretion or at the request of the Administrative Law Judge.
#### In the Matter of the Assignment of Cassius B. Elmore *et al.*to David Crossman for the Benefit of Creditors.

[Special Term.]

(Decided March 8th, 1880.)

The expense of the accounting of an assignee for the benefit of creditors is a proper charge against the estate ; and where a retiring assignee has done his duty, and has"paid over to his successor the whole estate, the fees of the referee upon his accounting may he paid *by*the new assignee out of the funds in his hands.

Application to confirm the report of a referee upon an accounting by a retiring assignee under a general assignment for the benefit of creditors.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

Van Hoesen, J.

The usual course is to charge the as signed estate with the expenses of the accounting. This is so, because to render an account is a necessary part of the duty of a trustee, and the law does not require that the expenses of executing the trust shall be borne by him. Our law requires an accounting before an assignee can be discharged, and the accounting is for the benefit of those having an interest in the assigned estate. This is so, though incidentally the sureties.of an assignee are benefited by an accounting, inasmuch as it is indispensable to their release from liability on their bond. The accounting of a retiring assignee is to be considered as part of the expenses of appointing a new assignee; and the rule is, that “the expenses of appointing new trustees, when necessary and proper, must unquestionably be borne out of the *corpus*of the trust estate.” (Hill on Trustees, marg. p. 189.)

In the first instance the new assignee who has the funds in Ms hands will pay the fees of the referee who audits the accounts of the retiring assignee, and if it should appear on the hearing of the motion to confirm the report that the retiring assignee ought to be compelled to pay the expenses of the ac*49counting, the proper order may be made to charge him. Where the retiring assignee retains any of the funds of the estate the rule might be different.

The report is required by the court, and the referee cannot be required to tile it till his fees have been paid. When the retiring assignee has done his duty, and has paid over to his successor the whole assigned estate, there is no sense in compelling him to pay the referee and thereby make himself a creditor of the assigned estate.

The motion is granted.

Application granted.
#### § 1026.400 General.

Futures commission merchants and introducing brokers in commodities are subject to the recordkeeping requirements set forth and cross referenced in this subpart. Futures commission merchants and introducing brokers in commodities should also refer to subpart D of part 1010 of this chapter for recordkeeping requirements contained in that subpart which apply to futures commission merchants and introducing brokers in commodities.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 21, 2012 

d0514 

Order 

 

May 21, 2012 

144393 

RONELY DESHON CHAMBERS, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 144393 

 COA: 302064 

Oakland CC: 2009-103537-CK 

JEFFREY B. HOLLANDER and 

LAW OFFICES OF JEFFREY B. HOLLANDER, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 12, 2011 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Managed Penions Assets Partnership 1989-C, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of
operations  contained  in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         304,944
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  75,006
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               379,950
<PP&E>                                         2,305,737
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,939,902)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 745,785
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,579
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     741,206
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   745,785
<SALES>                                        111,387
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               117,387
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  32,873<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                55,673
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            55,673
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   55,673
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expenses, production taxes and depreciation,
depletion and amortization expense.  Excludes general and administrative and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1061

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to more accurately codify

the depreciable life of semiconductor manufacturing equipment.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 27, 1995

Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut (for herself, Mr. MATSUI, Mr. CRANE, Mrs.

KENNELLY, and Ms. ESHOO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to more accurately codify the depreciable life of semiconductor manufacturing equipment.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Semiconductor Invest5 ment Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. 3-YEAR DEPRECIABLE LIFE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR

7 MANUFACTURING EQUIPMENT.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) of section

9 168(e)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating
2

HR 1061 IH

1 to classification of property) is amended by striking ‘‘and’’

2 at the end of clause (i), by striking the period at the end

3 of clause (ii) and inserting ‘‘, and’’, and by adding at the

4 end thereof the following new clause:

5 ‘‘(iii) any semiconductor manufacturing

6 equipment.’’

7 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

8 (1) Subparagraph (B) of section 168(e)(3) of

9 such Code is amended by striking clause (ii) and by

10 redesignating the succeeding clauses accordingly.

11 (2) Subparagraph (B) of section 168(g)(3) of

12 such Code is amended by striking the following:

‘‘(B)(ii) ............................................................................... 5’’

13 and inserting in lieu thereof the following:

‘‘(A)(iii) ............................................................................... 3’’.

14 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

15 this section shall apply to equipment placed in service

16 after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### § 129.4 Recordkeeping requirement.

Reporters shall maintain all information used in preparing a report under this part for the period specified in the notice published by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to section 129.3, and shall make this information available for review and inspection at the request of the Department of the Treasury.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1257 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1257

     To amend the Solid Waste Disposal Act, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 1995

  Mr. Dicks introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Solid Waste Disposal Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Landfill Technological Improvement 
Act of 1995''.

SEC. 2. USE OF ORGANIC SORBENTS.

    Section 3004(c)(2) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act (42 U.S.C. 
6924(c)(2)) is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence following subparagraph (B) by 
        striking ``during'' and inserting in lieu thereof ``in the 
        anaerobic environment of''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following: ``Notwithstanding 
        any regulations implementing subparagraph (B) of this paragraph 
        to the contrary, nothing in this section shall prohibit usage 
        in hazardous waste landfills of sorbents manufactured from 
        processed organic materials that would not be expected to 
        degrade in an anaerobic environment, until such time as the 
        Administrator issues final regulations concerning anaerobic 
        landfill conditions and the usage of organic sorbents in 
        landfills.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 69 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
H. J. RES. 69

   Providing for the reappointment of Homer Alfred Neal as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 24, 1995

Mr. Mineta (for himself, Mr. Livingston, and Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas) 
 introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on House Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
   Providing for the reappointment of Homer Alfred Neal as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 
43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian 
Institution, in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by 
reason of the expiration of the term of Homer Alfred Neal of Michigan 
on December 6, 1995, is filled by the reappointment of the incumbent 
for a term of six years, effective December 7, 1995.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,215,820
<SECURITIES>                                 1,837,120
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,495,890
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,737,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          274,319
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,793,712
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,737,300
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               145,340
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               431,710
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,346,520)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,346,520)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,346,520)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (35.81)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (35.81)<F1>
<FN>
<F1>EPS IS NET LOSS PER $1,000 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP UNIT
</FN>


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0652

IN THE MATTER OF:

C.L.D.,

A Youth in Need of Care.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the State’s Unopposed Motion to Supplement the 

Record on Appeal, submitted by the Appellee, and good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is granted: the briefing 

schedule is stayed and the record on appeal shall be supplemented with the 

following Thirteenth Judicial District Court record: State v. [N.J.D.], Cause No. 

DC-21-0508.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall serve all parties 

of record and the Clerk of District Court, Yellowstone County, with this Order. 

KFS

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 8 2022

02/08/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0652
§ 36.3121(l)(5)-1 Effect of termination. ( a ) *Termination of entire agreement.* ( 1 ) If the effective period of an agreement entered into by a domestic corporation as provided in § 36.3121(l)(1)-1 is terminated by the domestic corporation, pursuant to § 36.3121(l)(3)-1(a), with respect to all foreign subsidiaries named in the agreement, including any amendment thereof, an agreement may not again be entered into by the domestic corporation under the provisions of section 3121(l)(1).
( 2 ) If the effective period of an agreement entered into by a domestic corporation as provided in § 36.3121(l)(1)-1 is terminated by the Commissioner, pursuant to § 36.3121(l)(4)-1 (a), an agreement may not again be entered into by the domestic corporation under the provisions of section 3121(l)(1).
( 3 ) If the effective period of an agreement entered into by a domestic corporation as provided in § 36.3121(l)(1)-1 is terminated automatically by reason of a change in stock ownership (see § 36.3121(l)(3)-1(b)) with respect to all foreign corporations named in the agreement, including any amendment thereof, a new agreement may be entered into by the domestic corporation, as provided in § 36.3121(l)(1)-1, with respect to any foreign corporation which is a foreign subsidiary of the domestic corporation.
( b ) *Partial termination of agreement.* ( 1 ) If the effective period of an agreement entered into by a domestic corporation as provided in § 36.3121(l)(1)-1 is terminated by the domestic corporation, pursuant to § 36.3121(l)(3)-1(a), with respect to one or more foreign subsidiaries named in the agreement, including any amendment thereof, the period for which the agreement is in effect will continue with respect to any other foreign subsidiary or subsidiaries named in the agreement (or amendment). However, the agreement may not thereafter be amended to include any foreign subsidiary with respect to which the effective period of the agreement has been terminated.
( 2 ) If the effective period of an agreement entered into by a domestic corporation as provided in § 36.3121(l)(1)-1 is terminated automatically by reason of a change in stock ownership (see § 36.3121(l)(3)-1(b)) with respect to a foreign corporation which has ceased to be a foreign subsidiary of the domestic corporation, but the period for which the agreement is in effect continues with respect to one or more other foreign subsidiaries, the agreement may not thereafter be amended to include such foreign corporation even though the foreign corporation may again become a foreign subsidiary of the domestic corporation.
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-14-0513 SAT Date: 5/6/2014 Print Date: 6/4/2014
Related cases :

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 3

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 2 11

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: Yes Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Drinking Water Inhalation Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ;

P 2 Rec Comments : Comment: Forward with no comments Keywords : Keywords: Sens- Lung / Skin, Muta, Onco, Dev, Repro, Liver, Kidney, Aquatox Summary of Assessment : Fate : Fate Summary: P-14-0513 FATE: Estimations for typical n = 1, log Kow = 5.45 (E); VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) log Koc = 4.27 (E) log Fish BCF = 3.26 (E) log Fish BAF = 2.29 (E) POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption. OECD 301B (Mod Sturm CO2 ev): 0%/31d; OECD 301B (Mod Sturm CO2 ev): 0%/35d. Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = mo Sorption to soils/sediments = strong PBT Potential: P2B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = slow
Health : Health Summary: Absorption is poor all routes based on physical/chemical p roperties. Concerns are skin and lung sensitization, mutagenicity, oncogenicity, developmental toxicity, male reproductive, liver and kidney toxicity based on the moiety. Concern is low - moderate.
Ecotox : Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments
fish 96-h LC50 0.21 daphnid 48-h LC50 0.26 green algal 96-h EC50 0.21 fish

_ chronic value 0.004 daphnid

_ chronic value 0.018 algal

_ chronic value 0.021 Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _
Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for SAR chemical class = log Kow = 5.45 (EPI, n=0); with mp unknown (P); p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L; Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 1
SARsSAR Class Ecotox Category N one Ecotox Factors Comments: SAT Chair: Doritza Pagan-Rodriguez
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1070 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1070

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 20 (legislative day, June 19), 1995

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the reservoir created by Trinity Dam in the Central Valley 
               project, California, as ``Trinity Lake''.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF TRINITY LAKE.

    (a) Designation.--The reservoir created by Trinity Dam in the 
Central Valley project, California, and designated as ``Clair Engle 
Lake'' by Public Law 88-662 (78 Stat. 1093) is hereby redesignated as 
``Trinity Lake''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in any law, regulation, document, 
record, map, or other paper of the United States to the reservoir 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be considered to be a reference to 
``Trinity Lake''.
    (c) Conforming Amendment.--Public Law 88-662 (78 Stat. 1093) is 
repealed.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 15, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```