alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1030 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1030

                  For the relief of John M. Ragsdale.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 23, 1995

 Mr. Calvert introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                  For the relief of John M. Ragsdale.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMPENSATION FOR WORK-RELATED INJURY.

    (a) Authorization of Payment.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall 
pay, out of money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, the sum 
of $48,128.09 to John M. Ragsdale as compensation for injuries 
sustained by John M. Ragsdale in June and July of 1952 while John M. 
Ragsdale was employed by the National Bureau of Standards.
    (b) Settlement of Claims.--The payment made under subsection (a) 
shall be a full settlement of all claims by John M. Ragsdale against 
the United States for the injuries referred to in subsection (a).

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON AGENTS AND ATTORNEYS' FEES.

    It shall be unlawful for an amount that exceeds 10 percent of the 
amount authorized by section 1 to be paid to or received by any agent 
or attorney in consideration of services rendered in connection with 
this Act. Any person who violates this section shall be guilty of an 
infraction and shall be subject to a fine in the amount provided in 
title 18, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
(Hamilton County Common Pleas,

1901.)

#### HARRIET N. JOHNSON v. ANNIE M. GRUNKENMEYER.

The liability for injuries caused by defects In a sidewalk outside of a municipal corporation rests on the land-owner to whom power is given to build it in the first instance, not on the •county commissioners or township trustees.

Charles P. Mackelfresh and Charles T. Dumont, for plaintiff.

Tafel & Schott, contra.

Spiegel, J.

Plaintiff alleges that the plaintiff is the owner of a lot abutting on Spring Grove avenue, in Millcreek township in this countv; that in front of said premises there was a defective -sidewalk, upon which plaintiff walked, and without fault on her part, but solely by reason ■of defendant’s negligence in not keeping the sidewalk in repair, fell, was injured, and sustained damages in the sum of $550. To all •of which the defendant demurs.

It is a well settled rule that in municipal •corporations an owner is not liable for accidents arising from the defective condition, of ■sidewalks, unless he was guilty of affirmative negligence and active wrongful acts; otherwise the municipal corporation is liable. This is ■due to the fact that the care, supervision and control- of sidewalks, and the duty to keep -them in repair and free from nuisance, is imposed upon the council of municipal corporations. (See sections 2328 and 2640, Revised Statutes). No such duty is cast upon county •commissioners or township trustees; but, on the contrary, section 4909-1, Revised Statutes, authorizes a land owner abutting upon any highway outside a municipal corporation, to build and improve his own sidewalk, to be approved by the township trustees, and gives him an action for damages against any. person ■who maliciously injures the sidewalk.

It is true that section 845, Revised Statutes, defining powers and duties of county commissioners, has been amended as follows: “And any such board of county commissioners shall be liable in their official capacity for any damages received by reason of the negligence or carelessness of said commissioners in keeping any such road or bridge in proper repair;” but as neither tl#s section, nor any other, authorizes either county commissioners or township trustees to build sidewalks upon county roads, this right being exclusively granted to private property owners, the liability for neglect to keep such sidewalks in proper repair must rest upon those to whom power is given to build them in the first instance. County commissioners and township trustees are quasi corporations, and their powers must be strictly construed. The latter, certainly, can not be enlarged by judicial construction, in order to hold them liable for negligence upon improvements not erected by them nor placpd under their control by direct enactment.

The demurrer is, therefore, overruled.
Reaffirmation of Guaranty that reaffirms Manitex, LLC's obligation



 Exhibit 10.5 
 REAFFIRMATION OF GUARANTY 
 This Reaffirmation of Guaranty is made
by the undersigned in favor of COMERICA BANK, a Texas banking association (“Bank”). The undersigned acknowledges that MANITEX LIFTKING, ULC, a corporation incorporated under the provincial laws of Alberta (“Borrower”) and Bank
have executed that certain Amendment No. 1 to Note dated August 10, 2012 (“Amendment”), which amends that certain US$6,500,000.00 Amended and Restated Master Revolving Note dated December 23, 2011 by Borrower payable to Bank
(as amended, the “Revolving Note”) to increase the face amount of the Revolving Note to US$8,000,000. 
 The
undersigned consents to Borrower’s execution of the Amendment, ratifies its obligations under its Guaranty dated December 23, 2011 executed and delivered to Bank (“Guaranty”), confirms that the Guaranty remains in full force and
effect with respect to the Revolving Note, as amended by the Amendment, and certifies that it does not have any defense or setoff to its obligations under the Guaranty. 
 The undersigned certifies to Bank that its (i) Articles of Organization and Operating Agreement, and (ii) Corporate Resolutions and Incumbency Certification (Authority to Support Another’s
Borrowings) dated December 23, 2011, each previously delivered to Bank: (x) remain in full force and effect, (y) have not been amended, rescinded or repealed in any respect, and (z) may continue to be relied upon by Bank until
express written notice to the contrary is delivered to Bank. 
 Execution of this Reaffirmation does not amend or modify any of
the terms and conditions of the Guaranty, and Bank may continue to rely thereon without qualification. 
 Dated: August 10, 2012

  

			
	 MANITEX, LLC

		
	By:	 	/s/ David H. Gransee
		 	  

	Name:	 	David H.Gransee
	Its:	 	VP & CFO
#### § 1023.200 General.

Brokers or dealers in securities are subject to the program requirements set forth and cross referenced in this subpart. Brokers or dealers in securities should also refer to subpart B of part 1010 of this chapter for program requirements contained in that subpart which apply to brokers or dealers in securities.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Krupp Government Income Trust (the
"Trust") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas
Krupp, Chief Executive Officer of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Trust as of September 30, 2004 (the last date of the period
            covered by the Report).


/s/ Douglas Krupp
-----------------
Douglas Krupp,
Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 11, 2004


                                      -15-
02/05/2015 10:29 4252271007



### David Shayne FAAOffice ofRegional Counsel 160! 

### Lind Ave. SW Renton, Washington 98057 

### Telephone: (425) 227.2165 

### Facsimile: (425) 227-1007 ANM7



## UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

In the Matter

### of" FAA DOCKET NO. FAA 20)4"0116 

### Joseph Maridon, Sr. Judge Richard Goodwin NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY

TO: Joseph Maridon, Sr.: PAGE 02103



### PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Federal Aviation Administration by 

### and through the undersigned counsel will be unavailable the following dates: Febmary JO, 2015 

### through Jvfarch 1, 2015. 

### Respectfully submitted this 

## s'h day ofFebruary

### 2015.

David -· ayne FAA Attorney

NOTICE OFUNAVAILABIUTY Page 1of2 DAVID F. SHI\YNB,FAA ATTORNEY TEL: (425) 227-2165: F.".X: (425) 227-100702/05/2015 10:29 4252271007

**AN~~7**

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that the foregoing Notice ofUnavailability has been served

### via facsimile and/or electronic mail this date, to the following: Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur WrightBuilding-Suite2W1000 Fax: (202) 493-5142 

### Han. Richard C. Goodwin Office 

### ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Ave, S.E. EastBuilding Ground Floor, RoomEl2-230 Washington, D.C. 20590 Fax: (202) 366-7536 Joseph 

### R Maridon, 

### Jr. Respondent's Counsel 6130 Elton Ave Las 

### Vegas, NV 89107 Fax: (702) 410-6396 WalterL. Ayers Respondent's Counsel 13435 North Whitehouse Court Spokane, WA 99208 Walter_ayers@msn..com Datedthis 

### 510 day ofFebruary2015.

erri Kirk Office ofRegional Counsel (ANM-7) Federal Aviation Administration 160! Lind Ave. 

### SW Renton, WA 98057 ( 425) 227-2007 PAGE 03/03

NOTICE OF UNA V41LABJU1T DAVID F. SHAYNE. FAA ATTORN.EY Page2 of2 TEL (425) 227-2165; FAX (425) 227-100702/05/2015 10:29 4252271007 ANM7



### FACSIMILE MESSAGE DAVID F. SHAYNE FEDERALAVIATION ADMmiSTRATION OFFICE OF REGIONAL COUNSEL ANM-7 1601 LmD AVENUE S.W. RENTON, WASHINGTON 

### 98057 PAGE 01/03

The information contained inthis facsimile message is legally privileged a.nd confidential information and 

### is intended only for the use of

### the individual named on this cover 

### sheet Ifthe reader ofthis message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified

### that any 

### use, dissemination, distribution, or copy ofthis facsimile 

### is strictly prohibited. 

### Ifyou have received this facsimile in error, please immediately notifyus by telephone at 425-227-2007,


### DATE: TO: FAX NO.: PHONE NO.: RE:Joseph Maridon 

### Sr. FAA 2014·0116 

### February 5, 2015 FAA 

## (202) 267-1293 Email: 

### NO. PAGES: 

## FROM: FAX NO.: jPHONENO.: 

## 3 including cover David F. Shayne 425-227-2165 425-227-2160

I
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1129 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1129

 To amend the National Trails Systems Act to designate the route from 
           Selma to Montgomery as a National Historic Trail.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 3, 1995

  Mr. Lewis of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Hilliard, Mr. Ackerman, Mr. 
 Baldacci, Mr. Barrett of Wisconsin, Mr. Bishop, Ms. Brown of Florida, 
Mr. Bryant of Texas, Mr. Clay, Mrs. Clayton, Mr. Clyburn, Mrs. Collins 
  of Illinois, Mr. Conyers, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Dellums, Mr. DeFazio, Ms. 
 DeLauro, Mr. Engel, Mr. Farr, Mr. Fattah, Mr. Filner, Mr. Flake, Mr. 
Frank of Massachusetts, Mr. Frazer, Mr. Frost, Mr. Gene Green of Texas, 
  Mr. Hinchey, Mr. Jacobs, Ms. Jackson-Lee, Mr. Jefferson, Ms. Eddie 
  Bernice Johnson of Texas, Mr. Kildee, Ms. Lofgren, Mrs. Lowey, Mrs. 
Maloney, Mr. McDermott, Mrs. Meek of Florida, Mr. Miller of California, 
    Mr. Owens, Mr. Payne of New Jersey, Ms. Pelosi, Mr. Rangel, Mr. 
   Richardson, Mr. Rush, Mr. Sanders, Mrs. Schroeder, Mr. Scott, Mr. 
    Stupak, Mr. Thompson, Mr. Towns, Mr. Tucker, Mr. Underwood, Ms. 
  Velazquez, Mr. Williams, Mr. Ward, Mr. Watt of North Carolina, Mr. 
Wynn, Mr. Reynolds, Miss Collins of Michigan, Ms. McKinney, Mr. Mfume, 
    Ms. Waters, Mr. Hastings of Florida, Mr. Stokes, and Mr. Dixon) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the National Trails Systems Act to designate the route from 
           Selma to Montgomery as a National Historic Trail.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 5(a) of 
the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 1244(a)) is amended by adding 
at the end thereof the following new paragraph:
    ``(    ) The Selma to Montgomery National Historic Trail, 
consisting of 54 miles of city streets and United States Highway 80 
from Brown Chapel to A.M.E. Church in Selma to the State Capitol 
Building in Montgomery, Alabama, traveled by voting rights advocates 
during March 1965 to dramatize the need for voting rights legislation, 
as generally described in the report of the Secretary of the Interior 
prepared pursuant to subsection (b) of this section entitled `Selma to 
Montgomery' and dated April 1993. Maps depicting the route shall be on 
file and available for public inspection in the Office of the National 
Park Service, Department of the Interior. The trail shall be 
administered by the Secretary of the Interior. In the administration of 
the trail, the Secretary shall cooperate with State and local 
authorities to preserve historic sites, including (but not limited to) 
the Edmund Pettus Bridge and the Brown Chapel AME Church.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### John J. Napolitano, Appellant, v Anthony Polichetti, Respondent.

[806 NYS2d 629]

In an action, inter alia, for an accounting, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Austin, J), dated January 26, 2005, as denied that branch of his motion which was to strike the first affirmative defense alleging unclean hands based upon the defendant’s alleged failure to comply with a demand for a verified bill of particulars with respect to that defense.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The defendant’s verified bill of particulars was sufficient to “amplify the pleadings, limit proof and prevent surprise at trial” with respect to the defense of unclean hands; it is not a func*535tion of a bill of particulars to furnish evidentiary material *(see Kenler v Weissbach,*61 AD2d 976, 977 [1978]). Consequently, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was to strike the affirmative defense alleging unclean hands based upon the defendant’s alleged failure to comply with the demand for a verified bill of particulars with respect to that defense. Crane, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein and Lifson, JJ., concur.
## Court of Appeals of the State of Geo rgia

ATLA NTA,

_________________ ___ The Court of

Appeals he reby passes

the followi

ng order: A15D0062. NADINE MARIE JACKSON-RONE v. JP MORGAN C HASE BANK,N.A. et al. Nadine Jackson-Rone filed suit against JP Morgan Chas e Bank and Johnson & Freedm

an, LL C, alle ging, inter a lia, a quiet title claim. A fter the trial court dismissed the compl aint, Jac kson-Ronefiled an application for discretionary appeal in this Cour

t. The Supreme Court, however , has orig inal appe llate jurisdiction over cases involvingtitle to land. See Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI , Par. III(1). Be cause this appeal involves title to land, jurisdiction appears to lie in the Supreme Court. See Tharp v. Harpagon Co ., 278 Ga. 654, 655 (1) (604 SE2d 156 ) (20 04) . Acco rdi ngl y, this applic ation is her

eby T RANSF ERRED to the Supreme Court for disposition. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, At

lanta,_____

_______________ I certify t

hat the abo ve is a true extrac t fro m the minutes of the Court

of Appeals

of Georgia. Witness my signature a nd the seal of said court hereto aff

ixed the day and year last above writt

en. , Clerk. 10/01/2014 October 01, 2014
#### In the Matter of Lyndell C., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[804 NYS2d 313]

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Mary E. Bednar, J.), entered on or about September 20, 2004, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of attempted grand larceny in the fourth degree, and imposed a conditional discharge for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly denied appellant’s motion to suppress his statements to the police. The evidence established that appellant was questioned in a designated juvenile room in the presence of his mother, and that he knowingly and intelligently waived his *Miranda*rights *(see Fare v Michael C.,*442 US 707, 725-728 [1979]). Appellant clearly and unequivocally stated that he understood each right, and gave no indication to the contrary.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The evidence, including appellant’s voluntary and reliable statement, established his accessorial liability beyond a reasonable doubt. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Ellerin, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.

<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                        Jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                     Sep-30-1996
<CASH>                            3,224,055
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                          1,150,342
<ALLOWANCES>                        (24,817)
<INVENTORY>                       2,496,438
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  8,009,179
<PP&E>                            2,861,228
<DEPRECIATION>                          (309,495)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        11,837,399
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             3,522,941
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                                 113,516
<OTHER-SE>                                0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          11,837,399
<SALES>                           7,781,405
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 14,791,932
<CGS>                             4,732,773
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          5,780,097
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  9,758,624
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        84,181
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (718,561)
<INCOME-TAX>                         91,776
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (626,785)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                       (626,785)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               (0.6)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (0.6)
        

</TABLE>
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **CMBS Department**

 

MAC N9401-011

1055 10th Avenue SE

Minneapolis, MN 55414 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. 

1585 BROADWAY

NEW YORK, New York 10036-8200

 

RE: Annual Statement ofCompliance for Morgan Stanley Capital I Trust 2016- UBS12, Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates Series 2016-UBS12

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of December 1, 2016 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the yearending December 31, 2016 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

/s/ Gail Vannest

GAIL VANNEST

Vice President

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

TERRANCE SALTERS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-3117

[October 3, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Tim Bailey, Judge; L.T. Case No. 16-12036 CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Mara C. Herbert, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, TAYLOR and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.