alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             2157427
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       500000
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   2700232
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     2705362
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               168183
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                              1088
<OTHER-SE>                                         2536091
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       2705362
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     29959
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       288970
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    3283
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (262294)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (262294)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (262294)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.03)
        


</TABLE>
**
**Exhibit 31**

**Certifications**

I,Richard Simpson, certify that: 

1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Kand all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2016-P6 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2.    Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.    Based on my knowledge, all of thedistribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4.    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of RegulationAB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and 

5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their relatedattestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described insuch reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above,I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association; CWCapital Asset Management LLC; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC; Deutsche Bank TrustCompany Americas; Principal Real Estate Investors, LLC; Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; KeyBank National Association; CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc.; National Tax Search, LLC; Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC; Trimont RealEstate Advisors, LLC; AEGON USA Realty Advisors, LLC; and LNR Partners, LLC. 

Date:    March 28, 2019 

 

/s/ Richard Simpson

Richard Simpson

President, Citigroup CommercialMortgage Securities Inc. (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)

 

 
CGCMT 2016-P6 Certifications (2018) 

**
www.gpo.gov

### §1750c. Authority of Secretary

As Trustee for the Miccosukee Tribe, the Secretary shall—

(1)(A) aid and assist in the fulfillment of the Settlement Agreement at all times and in a reasonable manner; and

(B) to accomplish the fulfillment of the Settlement Agreement in accordance with subparagraph (A), cooperate with and assist the Miccosukee Tribe;

(2) upon finding that the Settlement Agreement is legally sufficient and that the State of Florida has the necessary authority to fulfill the Agreement—

(A) sign the Settlement Agreement on behalf of the United States; and

(B) ensure that an individual other than the Secretary who is a representative of the Bureau of Indian Affairs also signs the Settlement Agreement;

(3) upon finding that all necessary conditions precedent to the transfer of Miccosukee land to the Florida Department of Transportation as provided in the Settlement Agreement have been or will be met so that the Agreement has been or will be fulfilled, but for the execution of that land transfer and related land transfers—

(A) transfer ownership of the Miccosukee land to the Florida Department of Transportation in accordance with the Settlement Agreement, including in the transfer solely and exclusively that Miccosukee land identified in the Settlement Agreement for transfer to the Florida Department of Transportation; and

(B) in conjunction with the land transfer referred to in subparagraph (A), transfer no land other than the land referred to in that subparagraph to the Florida Department of Transportation; and

(4) upon finding that all necessary conditions precedent to the transfer of Florida lands from the State of Florida to the United States have been or will be met so that the Agreement has been or will be fulfilled but for the execution of that land transfer and related land transfers, receive and accept in trust for the use and benefit of the Miccosukee Tribe ownership of all land identified in the Settlement Agreement for transfer to the United States.

(Pub. L. 105–83, title VII, §705, Nov. 14, 1997, 111 Stat. 1625.)

#### Section Referred to in Other Sections

This section is referred to in section 1750d of this title.
#### § 26.1 Purpose.

This part prescribes procedures for the environmental review of, and comment by Federal agencies and the public on, proposed projects of multilateral development banks (MDBs).
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 116

To limit State authority to regulate certain activities on vessels, and for

other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. BILBRAY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To limit State authority to regulate certain activities on

vessels, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘California Cruise

5 Industry Revitalization Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. LIMITATION OF CERTAIN STATE AUTHORITY OVER

7 VESSELS.

8 Section 5(b)(2) of the Act of January 2, 1951 (15

9 U.S.C. 1175(b)(2), commonly referred to as the ‘‘Johnson

10 Act’’ is amended by adding at the end the following:
2

•HR 116 IH

1 ‘‘(C) EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN VOYAGES

2 AND SEGMENTS.—Except for a voyage or seg3 ment of a voyage that occurs within the bound4 aries of the State of Hawaii, a voyage or seg5 ment of a voyage is not described in subpara6 graph (B) if it includes or consists of a seg7 ment—

8 ‘‘(i) that begins and ends in the same

9 State;

10 ‘‘(ii) that is part of a voyage to an11 other State or to a foreign country; and

12 ‘‘(iii) in which the vessel reaches the

13 other State or foreign country within 3

14 days after leaving the State in which it

15 begins.’’.

Æ
|   | (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

| By:    | /s/ Feng Wang                         |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Feng Wang                             |   |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|   |                                  |   |

----
§ 1023.520 Special information sharing procedures to deter money laundering and terrorist activity for brokers or dealers in securities. ( a ) Refer to § 1010.520 of this chapter.
( b ) [Reserved]
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

CELEBRATION CRUISE LINE, LLC,

Appellant,

v.

OLEKSANDR DOBRIANSKIY; CELEBRATION CRUISE LINE, INC.; 

GUNEHR SHIPPING LIMITED; and XYZ CORP.,

Appellees.

No. 4D17-514

[August 9, 2017]

Appeal of a non-final order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth 

Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael L. Gates, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

15-021864 CACE (12).

Michael J. Dono, Jerry D. Hamilton and Robert M. Oldershaw of 

Hamilton, Miller & Birthisel LLP, Miami, for appellant.

No brief filed on behalf of appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Celebration Cruise Line, LLC appeals an order denying its motion to 

dismiss a personal injury suit based upon forum non conveniens. 

Because the trial court did not conduct the analysis required by Kinney 

System, Inc. v. Continental Ins. Co., 674 So. 2d 86 (Fla. 1996), or provide 

any explanation for denial, we reverse. 

A cruise ship employee is suing for negligence under the Jones Act 

and unseaworthiness after the employee lost a finger and permanently 

damaged three other fingers while mooring a supply vessel. Appellant 

moved to dismiss arguing in part that Broward County is an 

inconvenient forum and Florida has no nexus to this suit. Appellant 

provided affidavits and contracts to show that Celebration Cruise 

Holdings, Inc. sold the ship for scrap before the employee, a Ukrainian 

citizen, was hired by another company in the Ukraine to help transport 

the ship from the Bahamas to India. On route to India, he was injured in 

Namibia. Appellant alleged that it did not own or have control of the 

ship, it did not hire the employee, the ship was never in Florida after it 
2

was sold, the employee did not receive medical treatment in Florida, and 

there are no witnesses here. Appellant was mistakenly listed as the ship 

owner on the employment contract, but the ship had been sold and 

delivered to the buyer, Gunehr Shipping, Ltd., before the employee was 

recruited. 

The employee did not provide any evidence to the contrary. He argued 

that resolution of this issue was premature until he conducted further 

discovery. 

The court did not weigh the Kinney factors at the hearing on the 

motion to dismiss or make any findings in its order. See also Fla. R. Civ. 

P. 1.061(a) (codifying the Kinney factors). The court simply denied the 

motion without explanation. 

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. See, e.g., 

Sybac Solar AG, Co. v. Falz, 174 So. 3d 383 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015). 

Reversed and remanded.

GERBER, C.J., WARNER and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 195 Received in Senate (RDS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 195

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 27, 1996

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing the end of slavery in the United States, and the true day 
                 of independence for African-Americans.

Whereas ``Juneteenth'' celebrations have been held informally for over 130 years 
        to commemorate the strong survival instincts of African-Americans who 
        were first brought to this country stacked in the bottoms of slave ships 
        during 

a month-long journey across the Atlantic Ocean known as the ``Middle 
Passage'';

Whereas the Civil War was fueled by the economic and social divide caused by 
        slavery;
Whereas on January 1, 1863, President Abraham Lincoln signed the Emancipation 
        Proclamation, the enforcement thereof occurred only in those Confederate 
        States under the control of the Union Army;
Whereas on January 31, 1863, Congress passed the Thirteenth Amendment to the 
        Constitution abolishing slavery throughout the United States and its 
        territories;
Whereas on April 9, 1865, when General Robert E. Lee surrendered on behalf of 
        the Confederate States at Appomattox, the Civil War was nonetheless 
        prolonged in the Southwest;
Whereas news of the Emancipation Proclamation reached each State at different 
        times;
Whereas the Emancipation Proclamation was not enforced in the Southwest until 
        June 19, 1865, when Union General Gordon Granger landed at Galveston, 
        Texas, to present and read General Order No. 3;
Whereas former slaves in the Southwest began celebrating the end of slavery and 
        recognized ``Juneteenth Independence Day''; and
Whereas ``Juneteenth'' allows us to look back on the past with an increased 
        appreciation for the strength of the men, women, and children who for 
        generations endured unspeakable cruelties in bondage: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the end of slavery in the 
United States should be celebrated and recognized.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 26, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 6 Introduced in House (IH)]

                                     

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 6

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
             allowing an item veto in appropriations bills.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

 Mr. Archer (for himself, Mr. Calvert, Mr. Barton of Texas, Mr. Burton 
 of Indiana, Mr. Leach, Mr. Crane, Mr. Combest, Ms. Pryce, Mr. McHugh, 
Mr. Portman, Mr. Wolf, Mr. Smith of Texas, Mr. Bonilla, Mr. Oxley, Mr. 
  Shays, Mr. Ganske, Mr. Foley, Mr. Hansen, Mr. Paxon, Mr. Royce, Mr. 
 Coble, Mr. Ramstad, Mr. Gallegly, Mr. Goss, Mr. Greenwood, Mr. Stump, 
Mr. Montgomery, Mr. Moorhead, Mr. Petri, Mr. Goodling, Ms. Harman, Mr. 
 Livingston, Mr. Stearns, Mr. Bereuter, Mr. Saxton, Mr. Bilirakis, Mr. 
 Hancock, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. Condit, Mr. Franks, Mr. Klug, 
 Mr. Quillen, Mr. Shaw, Mr. Young of Florida, Mr. Baker of California, 
   Mr. Bunning of Kentucky, Mr. Packard, Mr. Roth, and Mr. Poshard) 
 introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
             allowing an item veto in appropriations bills.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution, which shall be valid to all intents and 
purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures 
of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The President shall have the power to disapprove any 
appropriation or provision and approve any other appropriation or 
provision in the same appropriation bill. In such case he shall, in 
signing the bill, designate the appropriations and provisions 
disapproved, and shall return a copy of such appropriations and 
provisions, with his objections, to the House in which the bill shall 
have originated; and the same proceedings shall then be had as in the 
case of other bills disapproved by the President.
    ``Section 2. This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have 
been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures 
of three-fourths of the several States within seven years from the date 
of its submission.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
       
<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                     JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                                950349
<SECURITIES>                                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                              0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                           0
<PP&E>                                                                     0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                             0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                        950349
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                      0
<BONDS>                                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                                0
<COMMON>                                                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                                            883408
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                          950349
<SALES>                                                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                       26063
<CGS>                                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                       71064
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                      (45001)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                  (45001)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                                         (45001)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                         (0.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1





ICONIX BRAND GROUP, INC.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,





AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF





THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Iconix Brand Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011 (the “Report”), I, Neil Cole, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Neil ColeNeil ColePresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate: August 9, 2011
Order entered July 15 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 15
- 00737
- CV JOHN CRUZ, Appellant

V. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND C O., Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause N o. C
- 13
- 04113
- B



### O RDER The Court has reviewed the clerk’s record and supplemental clerk’s record in this case. The appellant’s notice of appeal states appellant wishes to appeal the trial court’s order signed March 3, 2015 granting appellee’s motion for summary judgment. Although the clerk’s record includes an order signed March 3, 2015 denying appellant’s motion for summary judgment, the clerk’s record does not include the March 3, 2015 order granting appellee’s motion for summary judgment. Accordingly , we ORDER John Warren, Dallas County Clerk, to prepare and certify within five (5) days of the date of this order a supplemental clerk’s record including the trial court’s March 3, 2015 order granting appellee’s motion for summary judgment.

/ s/ CAROLYN WR IGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.6103(p)(4)-1 Procedures relating to safeguards for returns or return information.

For security guidelines and other safeguards for protecting returns and return information, see guidance published by the Internal Revenue Service. For procedures for administrative review of a determination that an authorized recipient has failed to safeguard returns or return information, see § 301.6103(p)(7)-1.

[T.D. 9445, 74 FR 6830, Feb. 11, 2009]