alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000856751
<NAME> FIRST KEYSTONE FINANCIAL INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,843
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           8,918
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     83,661
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          26,622
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            25,860
<LOANS>                                        182,899
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,574
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 320,797
<DEPOSITS>                                     228,747
<SHORT-TERM>                                    50,200
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,322
<LONG-TERM>                                     12,088
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,197
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,243
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  23,440
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 10,748
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,616
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   195
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                16,559
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,774
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,198
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            7,361
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      173
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  12
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,026
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,156
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,156
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,941
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.64
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.37
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,286
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,624
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,225
<RECOVERIES>                                         2
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,574
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,067
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            507
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Andre P. Lampkin, Appellant.

[803 NYS2d 480]

Appeal from a judgment of the Niagara County Court (Peter L. Broderick, Sr., J.), rendered July 16, 2003. The judgment revoked defendant’s probation and imposed a term of imprisonment.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed *(see People v Pedraza,*66 NY2d 626, 627 [1985]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Gorski, Smith and Lawton, JJ.
**Incorporation by Reference Do**  **cket ID No. EPA -**  **HQ -**  **OAR -**  **201 1**  **- 0147** 

**May 10, 2012** The contents of the following docket s are hereb y incorporated b y reference into and are considered to be included in, contained in and to have been placed in Docket EPA - HQ - OAR 2011 - 0147 (Technical Corrections, Clarifying and Other Amendments Package ): 1) EPA - HQ - OAR- 2008 - 0508 (Greenhouse Gas Mandatory Reporting) 2) EPA - HQ - OAR- 2009 - 0923 (Oil and Natural Gas Systems) 3) EPA - HQ - OAR- 2009 - 0924 (Confidential Business Information) 4) EPA - HQ - OAR- 20 09 - 0927 (Additional Sources of Fluorinated Gases) 5) EPA - HQ - OAR- 2010 - 0109 (Technical Corrections of Certain GHG MRR Provisions) 6) EPA - HQ - OAR- 2010 - 0929 (Change to the Reporting Date for Inputs to Equations) 7) EPA - HQ - OAR- 2011 - 0028 (Proposed Confidentiality Determin ations for 8 Subparts) 8) EPA - HQ - OAR- 2011 - 0417 (Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases: Petroleum and Natural Gas S ys tems: Revisions to Best Available Monitoring Method Provisions) 9) EPA - HQ - OAR- 2011 - 0512 (Technical Revisions for Subpart I and W of the Greenhou se Gas Reporting Rule) Accessing dockets: Publicly available docket materials are available either electronicall y through www.regulations.gov or in hard cop y at EPA’s Docket Center, Public Reading Room, EPA West Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW , Washington, DC 20004. This Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday , excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566 - 1744, and the telephone number for the Air Docket is (202) 566 - 1742.
_____________ No. 96-2717MN

_____________ John Kittel; Karen Kittel, * * Appellants, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the District v. * of Minnesota. * Dayton Hudson Corporation, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

_____________ Submitted: February 13, 1997 Filed: March 5, 1997

_____________ Before McMILLIAN, JOHN R. GIBSON, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. John Kittel and Karen Kittel appeal the district court's grant o f summary judgment in favor of Dayton Hudson Corporation. The district cour t granted summary judgment because John Kittel did not meet his employer's requirement that he be at work on the day the benefits were scheduled to com mence or any time afterwards, the enrollment forms he signed clearl y stated the terms of the benefits, and his Family Medical Leave Act claim failed because he did not work for his employer for twelve months. Having considered the record and the parties' briefs, we are satisfied th e distri ct court's judgment was correct and further discussion is no t warr anted. We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court' s opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### § 54.4980G-7 Special comparability rules for qualified HSA distributions contributed to HSAs on or after December 20, 2006 and before January 1, 2012.

Q-1 How do the comparability rules of section 4980G apply to qualified HSA distributions under section 106(e)(2)?

A-1: The comparability rules of section 4980G do not apply to amounts contributed to employee HSAs through qualified HSA distributions. However, in order to satisfy the comparability rules, if an employer offers qualified HSA distributions, as defined in section 106(e)(2), to any employee who is an eligible individual covered under any HDHP, the employer must offer qualified HSA distributions to all employees who are eligible individuals covered under any HDHP. However, if an employer offers qualified HSA distributions only to employees who are eligible individuals covered under the employer's HDHP, the employer is not required to offer qualified HSA distributions to employees who are eligible individuals but are not covered under the employer's HDHP.

Q-2: What is the effective date for the rules in this section?

A-2: The rules in this section are effective for are effective for employer contributions made for calendar years beginning on or after January 1, 2010.

[T.D. 9457, 74 FR 45999, Sept. 8, 2009]
www.gpo.gov

### §450e–2. Use of excess funds

Beginning in fiscal year 1998 and thereafter, where the actual costs of construction projects under self-determination contracts, compacts, or grants, pursuant to Public Laws 93–638, 103–413, or 100–297, are less than the estimated costs thereof, use of the resulting excess funds shall be determined by the appropriate Secretary after consultation with the tribes.

(Pub. L. 105–83, title III, §310, Nov. 14, 1997, 111 Stat. 1590.)

#### References in Text

Public Law 93–638, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 93–638, Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2203, as amended, known as the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act, which is classified principally to this subchapter (§450 et seq.). For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 450 of this title and Tables.

Public Law 103–413, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 103–413, Oct. 25, 1994, 108 Stat. 4250, known as the Indian Self-Determination Act Amendments of 1994, which is classified principally to part D (§458aa et seq.) of this subchapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 1994 Amendment note set out under section 450 of this title and Tables.

Public Law 100–297, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 100–297, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 130, as amended, known as the Augustus F. Hawkins-Robert T. Stafford Elementary and Secondary School Improvement Amendments of 1988. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 1988 Amendments note set out under section 6301 of Title 20, Education, and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Department of the Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1998, and not as part of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act which comprises this subchapter.

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:

Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title I, §101(d) [title III, §310], Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–181, 3009–221.

Pub. L. 104–134, title I, §101(c) [title III, §310], Apr. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 1321–156, 1321–197; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 104–140, §1(a), May 2, 1996, 110 Stat. 1327.
Exhibit 32.1

                                  Certification
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                                   As Adopted
                         Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                                   Sarbanes -
                                Oxley Act of 2002

         In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of HQ  Sustainable  Maritime
Industries,  Inc. (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September
30, 2004, as filed with the  Securities and Exchange  Commission  ("SEC") on the
date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned  officer of the Company  certifies,
pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:


         1.       the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

         A signed  original of this written  statement  has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and will be  furnished to the SEC or
its staff upon request.

 /s/ Norbert Sporns
-----------------------
Norbert Sporns
Chief Executive Officer

November 15, 2004




         This  Certification of Chief Executive  Officer pursuant to Section 906
of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002. This exhibit is not "filed" for purposes of
Section 18 of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 but is instead  furnished as
provided by applicable rules of the Securities Exchange Commission.
Revised Schedule to Severance Agreements



 Exhibit 10.12(a) 
 Revised Schedule to Severance Agreement 
 Horace Mann Educators Corporation (“HMEC”) entered into severance
agreements with the following persons on the dates shown. These agreements are substantially identical to the one included as Exhibit 10.7 to HMEC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 except that (1) the
multiple of the highest annual compensation received by the employee in the five preceding years used to determine a one-time cash payment is equal to the duration listed below and (2) the specified period during which such employee’s
insurance benefits would continue is equal to the duration below, and except as indicated in footnote (a). 
  

					
	Employee	  	Duration	  	Agreement Date
	Louis G. Lower II (a)	  	3 years	  	02-01-2000
			
	Ann M. Caparrós	  	2.9 years	  	03-07-1994
	Peter H. Heckman	  	2.9 years	  	04-10-2000
	Douglas W. Reynolds	  	2.9 years	  	11-12-2001
	Paul D. Andrews	  	2 years	  	07-02-2001
	Bret A. Conklin	  	2 years	  	01-14-2002
	Dwayne D. Hallman	  	2 years	  	01-21-2003
	Deborah F. Kretchmar	  	2 years	  	06-17-2002
	Ricky A. Renner	  	2 years	  	07-09-2001
	Robert E. Rich	  	2 years	  	02-19-2001



	(a)	HMEC entered into a severance agreement with Louis G. Lower II as set forth in the Lower Employment Agreement contained in Exhibit 10.12 to HMEC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1999.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,376,163
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          60,068
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             2,040,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,570,286
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       6,851,670
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         7,205,971
<LOANS>                                     30,573,076
<ALLOWANCE>                                    332,606
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              44,046,978
<DEPOSITS>                                  36,767,010
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            336,443
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       458,888
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,484,637
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              44,046,978
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,624,275
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              201,860
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               119,807
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             1,945,942
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             708,679
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             708,679
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,237,263
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   90,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              26,244
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                721,958
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                770,907
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     770,907
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   532,850
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.08
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.51
<LOANS-NON>                                    118,455
<LOANS-PAST>                                    25,478
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                725,581
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               273,406
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   58,954
<RECOVERIES>                                    28,154
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              332,606
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           332,606
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
* The case is unanimously ordered submitted without oral argument pursuant to

Fed. R. App. P. 34(a) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### MAR 17 1997 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DANNA J. HELMS, Defendant - Appellant. No. 96-3168 (D.C. No. 94-CR-10117-02) (District of Kansas)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before TACHA , BALDOCK and LUCERO , Circuit Judges.

Defendant Danna Helms pleaded guilty to interstate transportation in aid of a racketeering enterprise. The sentencing guidelin es yielded a range of imprisonment of 87 to 108 months. See II R., doc. 148 at 2-3. The maximum penalty established by statute, however, was 60 mon ths. See 18 U.S.C. § 1952(a)(3)(A) The district court sentenced defenda nt below the statutory- 2 -

maximum, to 54 months, because she was a minor part icipant in the offense, the offense was aberrant behavior for her and was cause d by her desire to feed her drug addiction. On appeal, defendant challenges the degree of the d istrict court's downward departure from the sentencing guidelines. She argu es that the district court should have relied on a combination of factors, inc luding her low degree of culpability, her difficult childhood and psychologi cal problems, to depart even further. It is well settled that, absent incorrect application of the guidelines, we lack jurisdiction to review defendant's challenge t o the degree of downward departure from the sentencing guidelines. United S tates v. Bromberg , 933 F.2d 895, 896-97 (10th Cir. 1991); 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a). Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Carlos F. Lucero Circuit Judge
IA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 29

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to limit

terms of Representatives and Senators.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Ms. FURSE introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States to limit terms of Representatives and Senators.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission

9 for ratification:
2

HJ 29 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE—

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. A person may not be elected to serve

3 a term as a Representative if the person has been elected

4 to serve as a Representative for each of the three terms

5 that immediately precede the term.

6 ‘‘SECTION 2. A person may not be elected to serve

7 a term as a Senator if the person has been elected to serve

8 as a Senator for each of the two terms that immediately

9 precede the term.

10 ‘‘SECTION 3. For purposes of this article, the election

11 or appointment of a person to fill a vacancy in the rep12 resentation of a State in the House of Representatives

13 shall be included as one term in determining the number

14 of times the person has been elected as a Representative

15 if the person fills the vacancy for less than two years, and

16 the election or appointment of a person to fill a vacancy

17 in the representation of a State in the Senate shall be in18 cluded as one term in determining the number of times

19 the person has been elected as a Senator if the person

20 fills the vacancy for less than six years.

21 ‘‘SECTION 4. For the purposes of this article, an elec22 tion which occurs before the date of the ratification of this

23 article shall not be included in determining the number
3

HJ 29 IH

1 of times a person has been elected as a Representative

2 or Senator.’’.

Æ
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Karl Muench, Appellant.

[804 NYS2d 258]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Hudson, J.), rendered January 20, 2004, convicting him of attempted rape in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Florio, J.P., Crane, Krausman, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur.
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________ No. 2 2

- 1 0470 Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus JAMIE JOS E PH MANZ ,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 8 : 18

- cr
- 00 477

- WFJ

- SPF

- 1

____________________ USCA11 Case: 22-10470 Date Filed: 07/29/2022 Page: 1 of 22 2

- 1 0470 Opinion of the Court 2

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, WILSON and A N DERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Jenny Devine , appointed counsel for Jamie Manz in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and Manz ’s rev ocation of supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED. USCA11 Case: 22-10470 Date Filed: 07/29/2022 Page: 2 of 2