alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>5
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         837,732
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  332,455
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (56,706)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      18,500,870
<DEPRECIATION>                             (9,334,100)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,871,287
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          804,248
<BONDS>                                     10,018,564
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,048,475
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,871,287
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,143,522
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,702,636
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,448
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             354,640
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 65,798
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             65,798
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    65,798
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .40
        

</TABLE>
#### § 20.660 Recipient.

*Recipient* means any individual, corporation, partnership, association, unit of government (except a Federal agency) or legal entity, however organized, that receives an award directly from a Federal agency.
www.gpo.gov

### §1135. Rules and regulations

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to prescribe rules and regulations to carry out the provisions of this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 89–660, §5, Oct. 14, 1966, 80 Stat. 911.)
§ 132.4 Exemptions. ( a ) *Automated clearing house systems.* The participants processing a particular transaction through an automated clearing house system are exempt from this regulation's requirements for establishing written policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent or prohibit restricted transactions with respect to that transaction, except for— ( 1 ) The receiving depository financial institution and any third-party processor receiving the transaction on behalf of the receiver in an ACH credit transaction;
( 2 ) The originating depository financial institution and any third-party processor initiating the transaction on behalf of the originator in an ACH debit transaction; and
( 3 ) The receiving gateway operator and any third-party processor that receives instructions for an ACH debit transaction directly from a foreign sender (which could include a foreign banking office, a foreign third-party processor, or a foreign originating gateway operator).
( b ) *Check collection systems.* The participants in a particular check collection through a check collection system are exempt from this regulation's requirements for establishing written policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent or prohibit restricted transactions with respect to that check collection, except for the depositary bank.
( c ) *Money transmitting businesses.* The participants in a money transmitting business are exempt from this regulation's requirements for establishing written policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent or prohibit restricted transactions, except for the operator.
( d ) *Wire transfer systems.* The participants in a particular wire transfer through a wire transfer system are exempt from this regulation's requirements for establishing written policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent or prohibit restricted transactions with respect to that transaction, except for the beneficiary's bank.
#### In the Matter of the Assignment of Julius Goldschmidt to Jacob Wolf for the Benefit of Creditors.

[Special Term.]

(Decided November, 1879.)

Where an action is pending, brought by an assignee for the benefit of creditors against the sheriff for taking property of the assigned estate under warrants of attachment obtained by creditors of the assignor, and an offer of compromise is made by such creditors to the assignee, leave to accept it will not be given him if the compromise is opposed by other creditors who are preferred in the assignment, and whose testimony will be available to the assignee on the trial of the pending action.

Application by an assignee under a general assignment for the benefit of creditors for leave to accept an offer of compromise by creditors of the assignor.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

J. F. Daly, J.

The assignee has done his duty in bringing the proposed offer of compromise on the part of attaching creditors to the attention of the court and inviting the persons interested in the estate to consider it. The opposition to the proposed compromise is general on the part of the preferred creditors, however. And. as they are most interested in the result of the pending action against the sheriff, and their testimony is available for the assignee on the trial, he should proceed with the suit.

Motion denied, without costs.
§ 53.4960-6 Applicability date. ( a ) *General applicability date.* Sections 53.4960-0 through 53.4960-4 apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2021. Taxpayers may choose to apply §§ 53.4960-0 through 53.4960-4 to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, and on or before December 31, 2021, provided the taxpayer applies §§ 53.4960-0 through 53.4960-4 in their entirety and in a consistent manner.
( b ) [Reserved]
[T.D. 9938, 86 FR 6219, Jan. 19, 2021]
#### Francis Marinaro et al., Respondents, v Barbara Radolinski, as Executor of Eugene Zarazinski, Deceased, Appellant.

*1079(Appeal No. 1.)

[803 NYS2d 498]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Peter J. Notaro, J.), entered August 11, 2004. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied defendant’s motion to set aside a jury verdict and grant a new trial.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs *(see Smith v Catholic Med. Ctr. of Brooklyn & Queens,*155 AD2d 435 [1989]; *see also*CPLR 5501 [a] [1], [2]). Present—Scudder, J.P., Martoche, Pine, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.
#### ZEMON *v.*WAYNE CIRCUIT JUDGE.

Mandamus — Receivers — Appeal and Error — Final Order — Remedy by Appeal Adequate.

A refusal to appoint a receiver in a judgment creditor’s suit is not reviewable on mandamus.

Mandamus by David S. Zenlon and another against Henry A. Mandel, one of the circuit judges for the county of Wayne, to compeLrespóndent to appoint a receiver in a judgment creditor’s suit.

Submitted June 11, 1912.

(Calendar No. 25,208.)

Writ denied July 22, 1912.

*Bernard B. Belling,*for relators.

*Berry & McCredie,*for respondent.

Brooke, J.

Upon the application of relators, respondent refused to appoint a receiver as prayed in a judgment creditors’ bill. Relators thereupon applied to this court for an order against respondent to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not issue directing him to set aside his order refusing to appoint a receiver and further directing him to appoint a receiver. The order to show cause issued, and the return is now before us.

We are met at the outset by the claim on the part of the respondent that mandamus is not the proper remedy. We are of opinion that respondent is correct in this contention. If the order in question is to be regarded as a final order, an appeal will lie. If not, the case may proceed to final decree in the court below, which decree may be reviewed by appeal. The attitude of the court upon the question of reviewing interlocutory orders by mandamus where there is another adequate remedy has frequently been made known. See *Mardian*v. *Wayne Circuit Judge,*118 *590Mich. 353 (76 N. W. 497), and cases cited; *Tarsney*v. *Wayne Circuit*Judge, 152 Mich. 641 (116 N. W. 465), and cases cited.

The writ is denied.

Moore, C. J.,- and Steere, McAlvay, Stone, Ostrander, and Bird, JJ., concurred. Blair, J., did not sit.
LA
      JOLLA
      COVE INVESTORS, INC.

    7817
      Herschel Ave., Suite 200

    LA
      JOLLA,
      CALIFORNIA 92037

    TELEPHONE:
      (415) 409-8703

    FACSIMILE:
      (415) 409-8704

    E-MAIL:
      LJCI@PACBELL.NET

    
      	
              LA
                JOLLA 

            	
              www.ljcinvestors.com


            	
              SAN
                FRANCISCO

            


    

     

    February
      28, 2007

     

    


    W.
      Gerald
      Newmin

    MultiCell
      Technologies, Inc.

    701
      George Washington Highway

    Lincoln,
      Rhode Island 02865

    


    Dear
      Gerald:

    


    Reference
      is made to the $100,000 Convertible Debenture dated February 28, 2007 issued
      by
      MultiCell Technologies, Inc. (“Company”) to La Jolla Investors, Inc. (“Holder”).
      All terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the
      definitions set forth in the Convertible Debenture.

    


    Beginning
      one year from the Closing Date, Holder shall submit Debenture conversion notices
      and related Warrant exercise notices in an amount such that Holder receives
      a
      total of 1% of the outstanding shares of the Company every calendar quarter
      for
      a period of one year, provided that Holder is able to sell such shares under
      Rule 144. Beginning two years from the Closing Date, Holder shall convert $5,000
      of the Debenture and exercise 500,000 Warrant Shares each calendar month,
      provided that Holder is able to sell such shares under Rule 144(k). If Holder
      converts more than such minimum amounts, the excess shall be credited against
      the next period’s minimum. In the event Holder does not convert and exercise the
      minimum amounts set forth in the first two sentences of this paragraph, the
      Company’s remedy shall be limited to Holder not being entitled to collect
      interest on the Debenture for that calendar quarter or calendar month, as
      applicable.

    


    Sincerely,

    


    /s/T.W.
      Huff

    


    Travis
      W.
      Huff

    Portfolio
      Manager

    


    


    MultiCell
      Technologies, Inc.

    


    By:
      /s/Stephen
      MW Chang

    


    Title:
      President
      & CEO
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1026 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1026

To designate the United States Post Office building located at 201 East 
  Pikes Peak Avenue in Colorado Springs, Colorado, as the ``Winfield 
                     Scott Stratton Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 23, 1995

  Mr. Hefley introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the United States Post Office building located at 201 East 
  Pikes Peak Avenue in Colorado Springs, Colorado, as the ``Winfield 
                     Scott Stratton Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States Post Office building located at 201 East Pikes 
Peak Avenue, Colorado Springs, Colorado, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Winfield Scott Stratton Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Winfield Scott Stratton Post 
Office''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 44 (Monday, March 7, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11791-11792]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-05033]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0844; FRL-9942-69]

Imidacloprid Registration Review; Draft Pollinator Ecological 
Risk Assessment; Extension of Comment Period

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice; extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA issued a notice in the Federal Register of January 15, 
2016, opening a comment period for a draft pollinator-only ecological 
risk assessment for the registration review of imidacloprid. This 
document extends the comment period for 30 days, from March 15, 2016 to 
April 14, 2016. This comment period is being extended in response to a 
number of extension requests from various stakeholders.

DATES: Comments, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA-
HQ-OPP-2008-0844, must be received on or before April 14, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Follow the detailed instructions provided under ADDRESSES in 
the Federal Register document of January 15, 2016 (81 FR 2212) (FRL-
9940-82).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kelly Ballard, Pesticide Re-Evaluation 
Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental 
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001; telephone number: (703) 305-8126; email address: 
ballard.kelly@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    This document extends the public comment period established in the

[[Page 11792]]

Federal Register document of January 15, 2016 (81 FR 2212) (FRL-9940-
82). In that document, EPA opened a comment period for a draft 
pollinator-only ecological risk assessment for the registration review 
of imidacloprid. EPA is hereby extending the comment period, which was 
set to end on March 15, 2016, to April 14, 2016.
    To submit comments, or access the docket, please follow the 
detailed instructions provided under ADDRESSES in the Federal Register 
document of January 15, 2016. If you have questions, consult the person 
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.

    Dated: February 29, 2016.
Yu-Ting Guilaran,
Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2016-05033 Filed 3-4-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
# L_2019177EN.01008101.xml

| 2.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 177/81 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 177/81

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2019/1126

of 25 June 2019

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications ‘Jambon du Kintoa’ (PDO)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, France's application to register the name ‘Jambon du Kintoa’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, France's application to register the name ‘Jambon du Kintoa’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Jambon du Kintoa’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Jambon du Kintoa’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Jambon du Kintoa’ (PDO) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.2. – Meat products (cooked, salted, smoked, etc.), as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 June 2019.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 36, 29.1.2019, p. 19.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
§ 19.110 What is the purpose of the nonprocurement debarment and suspension system? ( a ) To protect the public interest, the Federal Government ensures the integrity of Federal programs by conducting business only with responsible persons.
( b ) A Federal agency uses the nonprocurement debarment and suspension system to exclude from Federal programs persons who are not presently responsible.
( c ) An exclusion is a serious action that a Federal agency may take only to protect the public interest. A Federal agency may not exclude a person or commodity for the purposes of punishment.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                    6474178
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                             3995959
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                0
<PP&E>                                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           10474322
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           0
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                               10161119
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             10474322
<SALES>                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          1549163
<CGS>                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           301880
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           1247283
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       1247283
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                              1247283
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               17.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer of HQ Sustainable Maritime Industries, Inc. (the Company), certifies that, to his knowledge
on the date of this certification:



|1. | This Quarterly Report on Form 10Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The foregoing certifications are made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350) and shall
not be relied upon for any other purpose.

Dated: August 9, 2010



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Norbert Sporns     
|Norbert Sporns         
|Chief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0033

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

JUSTIN LEE LONGTINE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 15, 2020, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 11 2020

05/11/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0033