alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2022002DE.01000901.xml

| 6.1.2022 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 2/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.1.2022

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 2/9

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) 2019/1009 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 5. Juni 2019 mit Vorschriften für die Bereitstellung von EU-Düngeprodukten auf dem Markt und zur Änderung der Verordnungen (EG) Nr. 1069/2009 und (EG) Nr. 1107/2009 sowie zur Aufhebung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 2003/2003

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 170 vom 25. Juni 2019
  )

Seite 37, Anhang I Teil I Nummer 1 Buchstabe C Ziffer II Buchstabe a:

Anstatt:

| „a) | Anorganisches Einnährstoff-Düngemittel“ |
| --- | --- |

„a)

Anorganisches Einnährstoff-Düngemittel“

muss es heißen:

| „a) | Anorganisches Einnährstoff-Spurennährstoff-Düngemittel“ |
| --- | --- |

„a)

Anorganisches Einnährstoff-Spurennährstoff-Düngemittel“

Seite 44, Anhang I Teil II unter PFC 1(C): ANORGANISCHES DÜNGEMITTEL in Nummer 2:

Anstatt:

„...

die Anforderung erfüllen, dass in einem anorganischen Düngemittel enthaltene Krankheitserreger dürfen die in der folgenden Tabelle aufgeführten Grenzwerten nicht überschreiten:“

muss es heißen:

„...

die Anforderung erfüllen, dass in einem anorganischen Düngemittel enthaltene Krankheitserreger die in der folgenden Tabelle aufgeführten Grenzwerte nicht überschreiten dürfen:“

Seite 78, Anhang I Teil II unter PFC 1(C)(II)(A) in der Überschrift:

Anstatt:

„PFC 1(C)(II)(A): ANORGANISCHES EINNÄHRSTOFF-DÜNGEMITTEL“

muss es heißen:

„PFC 1(C)(II)(a): ANORGANISCHES EINNÄHRSTOFF-SPURENNÄHRSTOFF-DÜNGEMITTEL“

---
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 101 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 101

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             February 2 (legislative day, January 30), 1995

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To transfer a parcel of land to the Taos Pueblo Indians of New Mexico.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAND TRANSFER.

    (a) Transfer.--The parcel of land described in subsection (b) is 
hereby transferred without consideration to the Secretary of the 
Interior to be held in trust for the Pueblo de Taos. Such parcel shall 
be a part of the Pueblo de Taos Reservation and shall be managed in 
accordance with section 4 of the Act of May 31, 1933 (48 Stat. 108) (as 
amended, including as amended by Public Law 91-550 (84 Stat. 1437)).
    (b) Land Description.--The parcel of land referred to in subsection 
(a) is the land that is generally depicted on the map entitled ``Lands 
transferred to the Pueblo of Taos--proposed'' and dated September 1994, 
comprises 764.33 acres, and is situated within sections 25, 26, 35, and 
36, Township 27 North, Range 14 East, New Mexico Principal Meridian, 
within the Wheeler Peak Wilderness, Carson National Forest, Taos 
County, New Mexico.
    (c) Conforming Boundary Adjustments.--The boundaries of the Carson 
National Forest and the Wheeler Peak Wilderness are hereby adjusted to 
reflect the transfer made by subsection (a).
    (d) Resolution of Outstanding Claims.--The Congress finds and 
declares that, as a result of the enactment of this Act, the Taos 
Pueblo has no unresolved equitable or legal claims against the United 
States on the lands to be held in trust and to become part of the 
Pueblo de Taos Reservation under this section.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 1, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
ex10-55.htm


Exhibit 10.55







ASSIGNMENT OF PURCHASE CONTRACT












THIS ASSIGNMENT (the "Assignment") is made effective as of this 6th day of July, 2012, by and between APPLE SUITES REALTY GROUP, INC., a Virginia corporation ("Assignor"), and APPLE TEN HOSPITALITY OWNERSHIP, INC., a Virginia corporation ("Assignee").


 


RECITALS


 


A.           Pursuant to that certain Purchase Contract dated as of July 7, 2011  (the “Purchase Contract”), between certain persons and entities set forth on Item 2(a) of Schedule 1 of the Purchase Contract (the “Interest Owners”), Sunbelt-CNB, LLC, an Alabama limited liability company (the “Company”) and Assignor, the Interest Owners agreed to sell all of their interests in the Company to the Assignor.


 


B.           Assignor now desires to assign its rights under the Purchase Contract to Assignee.


 


WITNESSETH


 


FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) cash in hand paid, other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


1.           Assignment.                      Assignor hereby assigns and conveys to Assignee all of its right, title, and interest in, to, and under the Purchase Contract.  This Assignment shall not relieve Assignor of its obligations and liabilities under the Purchase Contract.


 


2.           Assumption.  Assignee hereby assumes and agrees to perform all of Assignor's obligations under the Purchase Contract.


 




  





1











  






 


3.           Reimbursement.  Assignee hereby agrees to reimburse Assignor the amount of the Earnest Money Deposit paid by Assignor pursuant to Section 2.5 of the Purchase Contract.


 


4.           The rights and obligations of the parties hereunder shall extend to, be binding upon and inure to the benefit of their respective successors and assigns.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Assignment as of the date first above written.







ASSIGNOR:


 


APPLE SUITES REALTY GROUP, INC., a Virginia corporation

















By:           /s/ Justin G. Knight                                  


Name:      Justin G. Knight                                        


Title:        President                                                     












ASSIGNEE:







APPLE TEN HOSPITALITY OWNERSHIP, INC.


a Virginia corporation












By:           /s/ David Buckley                                     


Name:      David Buckley                                          


Title:        Vice President                                            














  





2
# L_2019332EN.01001401.xml

| 23.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 332/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 332/14

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2019/2204

of 16 December 2019

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Κρασοτύρι Κω’ (Krasotiri Ko)/‘Τυρί της Πόσιας’ (Tiri tis Possias) (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Greece’s application to register the name ‘Κρασοτύρι Κω’ (Krasotiri Ko)/‘Τυρί της Πόσιας’ (Tiri tis Possias) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Greece’s application to register the name ‘Κρασοτύρι Κω’ (Krasotiri Ko)/‘Τυρί της Πόσιας’ (Tiri tis Possias) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Κρασοτύρι Κω’ (Krasotiri Ko)/‘Τυρί της Πόσιας’ (Tiri tis Possias) (PGI) should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Κρασοτύρι Κω’ (Krasotiri Ko)/‘Τυρί της Πόσιας’ (Tiri tis Possias) (PGI) should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Κρασοτύρι Κω’ (Krasotiri Ko)/‘Τυρί της Πόσιας’ (Tiri tis Possias) (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.3. Cheeses, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 December 2019.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 283, 21.8.2019, p. 3.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Donna R. Gilman, Appellant, v Champlain Valley Physicians Hospital et al., Respondents. Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent.

[804 NYS2d 123]

Peters, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensa*861tion Board, filed May 3, 2004, which ruled that claimant had no further work-related disability subsequent to August 5, 2003 and discontinued her workers’ compensation benefits.

Claimant was awarded workers’ compensation benefits for an injury to her neck and back sustained in February 2000 when, while working as a nurse, she repeatedly lifted and moved a heavy patient. In September 2003, claimant’s benefits were suspended pending further development of the record regarding the causal relationship between her February 2000 work-related injury and her current disability. After a hearing, a Workers’ Compensation Law Judge determined that several of claimant’s current medical conditions were not causally related to the February 2000 work-related injury, but that she remains disabled and in need of medical treatment as a result of that injury, and benefits were, therefore, continued. Upon review, the Workers’ Compensation Board found that claimant’s February 2000 work-related injury had resolved, her medical conditions and disability subsequent to August 5, 2003 were not causally related to that injury and it modified the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Law Judge accordingly. Claimant appeals.

So long as the Board’s determination is supported by substantial evidence it will be upheld *(see Matter of Cunningham v Wessanen USA, Inc., 20*AD3d *651, 652*[2005]; *Matter of Thomas v City of Albany School Dist.,*307 AD2d 664, 664 [2003]). Upon review of the entire record in this case, it is clear that there are conflicting medical opinions. The employer’s medical expert testified that claimant’s current medical complaints and disability are not causally related to the February 2000 work-related injury, while claimant’s treating physician opined that there is a causal relationship. It is well settled that the resolution of such conflicting medical opinions lies within the province of the Board *(see Matter of Cunningham v Wessanen USA, Inc., supra*at 652; *Matter of Thomas v City of Albany School Dist., supra*at 664; *Matter of Panagiotatos v Eastman Kodak Co.,*222 AD2d 877, 878 [1995]). Here, the Board found the opinion of the employer’s expert more credible than that of claimant’s expert. There being substantial evidence supporting the Board’s determination, we will not disturb it despite the existence of evidence which would support the opposite conclusion *(see Matter of Thomas v City of Albany School Dist., supra*at 664-665; *Matter of Harrington v Whitford Co.,*302 AD2d 645, 647-648 [2003]).

Crew III, J.P., Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-2836
JANETTE MOSLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LOW COUNTRY MEDIA, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-94-2317-2-18) Submitted: February 27, 1996 Decided: March 21, 1996 Before HALL and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Janette Mosley, Appellant Pro Se. Henry Ellerbe Grimball, GRIMBALL & CABANISS, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing her employment discrimination suit as untimely. We have reviewedthe record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mosley v. Low Country Media , No. CA-94-2317-2-18 (D.S.C. Sept. 13, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 191 Received in Senate (RDS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 191

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 18, 1996

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  To confer honorary citizenship of the United States on Agnes Gonxha 
                 Bojaxhiu, also known as Mother Teresa.

Whereas the United States has conferred honorary citizenship on only three 
        occasions in its more than two hundred years, and honorary citizenship 
        is and should remain an extraordinary honor not lightly conferred nor 
        frequently granted;
Whereas Agnes Gonxha Bojaxhiu, better known throughout the world as Mother 
        Teresa, has worked tirelessly with orphaned and abandoned children, the 
        poor, the sick, and the dying;
Whereas Mother Teresa founded the Missionaries of Charity in 1950, and has taken 
        in those who have been rejected as ``unacceptable'' and cared for them 
        when no one else would, regardless of race, color, creed, or condition;
Whereas Mother Teresa has deservedly received numerous honors, including the 
        1979 Nobel Peace Prize and the 1985 Presidential Medal of Freedom;
Whereas Mother Teresa has worked in areas all over the world, including the 
        United States, to provide comfort to the world's neediest; and
Whereas Mother Teresa through her Missionaries of Charity has established within 
        the United States numerous soup kitchens, emergency shelters for women, 
        shelters for unwed mothers, shelters for men, after-school and summer 
        camp programs for children, homes for the dying, prison ministry, 
        nursing homes, and hospital and shut-in ministry: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Agnes Gonxha Bojaxhiu, 
also known as Mother Teresa, is proclaimed to be an honorary citizen of 
the United States of America.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 17, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
§ 513.9 Information to be furnished in ordinary course. In compliance with the provisions of Article XX of the convention the Commissioner of Internal Revenue will transmit to the Irish Revenue Commissioners, as soon as practicable after the close of the calendar year 1952 and of each subsequent calendar year during which the convention is in effect, the following information relating to such preceding calendar year: ( a ) The name and address of each person whose address as disclosed on each available Form 1042 is in Ireland deriving from sources within the United States dividends, interest, rent, royalties, salaries, wages, pensions, annuities, and other fixed or determinable annual or periodical income; and the amount of such income as disclosed on such form with respect to each such person.
( b ) The duplicate copy of each available ownership certificate, Form 1001-IR, filed pursuant to § 513.3(b), and substitute Form 1001-IR, filed pursuant to § 513.7(a), in connection with coupon bond interest.
Exhibit
32.2




ICONIX
BRAND GROUP, INC.




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF




THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Iconix Brand Group, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”), I, Warren
Clamen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Warren ClamenWarren
      ClamenExecutive
      Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:
      August 6, 2009
#### § 31.6404(a)-1 Abatements.

For regulations under section 6404 of general application to the abatement of taxes, see § 301.6404-1 of this chapter (Regulations on Procedure and Administration). Every claim filed by an employer for abatement of employee tax under section 3101 or section 3201, or a corresponding provision of prior law, shall be made in the manner and subject to the conditions stated in paragraphs (a) (2) and (c) of § 31.6402(a)-2, as if the claim for abatement were a claim for refund.
#### § 509.110 Patent and copyright royalties and film rentals.

Royalties and other amounts representing consideration for the right to use copyrights, artistic and scientific works, patents, designs, plans, secret processes and formulae, trademarks, and other like property and rights, including rentals and like payments in respect to motion picture films or for the use of industrial, commercial, or scientific equipment, which are derived from sources within the United States by a nonresident alien individual who is a resident of Switzerland, or by a Swiss corporation or other entity, are exempt from United States tax under the provisions of Article VIII of the convention if such alien, corporation, or other entity at no time during the taxable year in which such items of income are derived has a permanent establishment in the United States.
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant To**

**Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-OxleyAct Of 2002**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as adoptedpursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned interimChief Executive Officer of VirtualFund.com, Inc. (the “Company”), herebycertify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for thequarterly period ended September 30, 2002 (the “Report”) fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 
| Date:  January 13, 2003 | /s/ Joseph D. Pupel                                                                             |
|------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                         | Joseph D. Pupel,                                                                                |
|                         | Interim Chief Executive  Officer (principal executive officer and principal accounting officer) |

 

----
§ 156.6071-1 Time for filing returns relating to greenmail. ( a ) *In general.* Returns required by § 156.6011-1 (relating to liability for tax on greenmail under section 5881) shall be filed on or before the ninetieth day following receipt of any portion of the greenmail. Greenmail is considered to be received when gain or other income is realized, as determined according to the taxpayer's method of accounting, without regard to any provision of the Code providing for deferral of recognition.
( b ) *Returns relating to greenmail received before the date these regulations become final.* Returns required by § 156.6011-1 that relate to greenmail received on or before December 18, 1991, shall be filed on or before March 18, 1992.
IB

Union Calendar No. 170

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1051

[Report No. 104–319]

To provide for the extension of certain hydroelectric projects located in the

State of West Virginia.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 24, 1995

Mr. MOLLOHAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Commerce

NOVEMBER 7, 1995

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union

and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To provide for the extension of certain hydroelectric projects

located in the State of West Virginia.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the time period

5 specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16

6 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to Federal Energy
2

•HR 1051 RH

1 Regulatory Commission projects numbered 6901 and

2 6902, the Commission shall, upon the request of the li3 censee for those projects, in accordance with the good

4 faith, due diligence, and public interest requirements of

5 that section, the Commission’s procedures under that sec6 tion, and the procedures specified in that section, extend

7 the time period during which the licensee is required to

8 commence construction of those projects so as to termi9 nate on October 3, 1999.

10 (b) APPLICABILITY.—Subsection (a) shall take effect

11 for the projects upon the expiration of the extension, is12 sued by the Commission under section 13 of the Federal

13 Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806), of the period required for

14 commencement of construction of the projects.

15 (c) REINSTATEMENT OF EXPIRED LICENSE.—If a li16 cense for a project described in subsection (a) has expired

17 prior to the date of enactment of this Act, the Commission

18 shall reinstate the license effective as of the date of its

19 expiration and extend the time required for commence20 ment of construction of the project until October 3, 1999.

Union Calendar No. 170

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1051

[Report No. 104–319]

A BILL

To provide for the extension of certain hydroelectric

projects located in the State of West Virginia.

NOVEMBER 7, 1995

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union and ordered to be printed