[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 156 (Friday, August 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41171-41172]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19521]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Treatment of Pension Rollover Distributions

AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration, Department of Labor.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Employment and Training Administration has provided 
guidance to State workforce agencies on an amendment to Federal 
unemployment compensation (UC) law that prohibits the reduction of UC 
due to nontaxable pension rollover distributions. This continuing 
guidance was issued on May 4, 2009 as UIPL No. 10-09 and is published 
below to inform the public. It rescinds UIPL No. 22-87, Change 2.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

UIPL 10-09: Treatment of Pension Rollover Distributions

    1. Purpose. To advise States of an amendment to Federal 
unemployment compensation (UC) law that prohibits the reduction of UC 
due to nontaxable pension rollover distributions.
    2. References. Sections 3304(a)(15) of the Federal Unemployment Tax 
Act (FUTA); Public Law 109-280, the Pension Protection Act of 2006; 
Public Law 110-458, the Worker, Retiree, and Employer Recovery Act of 
2008; Unemployment Insurance Program Letter (UIPL) 22-87 and Changes 1 
(60 FR 55,604 (1995)) and 2 (68 FR 15,241 (2003)); Internal Revenue 
Service (IRS) Publications 575 and 590; and IRS Tax Topic 413--
Rollovers from Retirement Plans.
    3. Background. As a result of an amendment made by the Worker, 
Retiree, and Employer Recovery Act of 2008, States are now prohibited 
from reducing UC due to nontaxable pension rollover distributions. 
Whether to reduce UC due to receipt of taxable distributions remains a 
matter for the State to determine. This UIPL is issued to explain the 
amendment and its effect.
    Based on information available to the Department, only one State 
currently reduces UC due to any pension rollovers. However, all States 
should review their laws regarding treatment of

[[Page 41172]]

rollovers to assure State law is consistent with the amendment.
    4. Amendment to Federal Law. Section 3304(a)(15), FUTA, requires, 
as a condition of employers in a State receiving credit against the 
Federal unemployment tax, that the State law provide that the amount of 
UC payable to an individual be reduced for any week which begins in a 
period with respect to which the individual is ``receiving a 
governmental or other pension, retirement or retired pay, annuity, or 
any other similar periodic payment which is based on the previous work 
of such individual . * * *'' This section goes on to provide certain 
exceptions to this requirement that are not relevant here.
    The Pension Protection Act of 2006 added new language to the end of 
section 3304(a), FUTA, providing that UC ``shall not be reduced under 
paragraph (15)'' due to any retirement payment ``not includible in 
gross income of the individual for the taxable year in which paid 
because it was part of a rollover distribution.'' The Worker, Retiree, 
and Employer Recovery Act of 2008 deleted this language, redesignated 
existing provisions of section 3304(a)(15), FUTA, and added the 
following new language:

    (B) the amount of compensation shall not be reduced on account 
of any payments of governmental or other pensions, retirement or 
retired pay, annuity, or other similar payments which are not 
includible in the gross income of the individual for the taxable 
year in which it was paid because it was part of a rollover 
distribution * * *.

    5. Effect of Amendment. Prior to the 2006 amendment, States were 
free to determine whether rollover distributions would cause a 
reduction in UC. (See UIPL 22-87, Change 2, which this UIPL rescinds.) 
The effect of the 2006 amendment was ambiguous as it was unclear 
whether it prohibited the reduction of UC due to rollover distributions 
or merely clarified that FUTA did not require this reduction. The 2008 
amendment is clear that States may not reduce UC due to payments 
``which are not includible in the gross income of the individual for 
the taxable year in which it was paid because it was part of a rollover 
distribution . * * * '' In summary, as a result of the 2008 amendment, 
States are prohibited from reducing UC due to these nontaxable 
distributions; whether to reduce taxable distributions remains a matter 
for the State to determine.
    Whether a rollover distribution is ``not includible in the gross 
income of the individual'' for a taxable year is determined under IRS 
guidelines. In general, a distribution from an eligible retirement plan 
is not includible in gross income when the taxpayer ``rolls over'' the 
distribution to another eligible retirement plan within 60 days.
    Rollovers may occur in two ways. If the distribution is rolled over 
directly from one eligible retirement plan to another, the amount will 
not be includible in gross income, and FUTA therefore prohibits 
reduction of UC due to this rollover. If the distribution is paid 
directly to the individual, any amount of the requested distribution 
the individual pays into a qualified retirement plan within 60 days is 
not includible in gross income, meaning that a State may not reduce UC 
by that amount. Conversely, any amount distributed to the individual 
that the individual does not timely pay into another eligible 
retirement plan is includible in gross income; States may therefore 
elect to either reduce the individual's UC by that amount or not.
    For further information on rollovers and their tax status, see IRS 
Tax Topic 413--Rollovers from Retirement Plans and IRS Publications 575 
and 590. These documents are available at http://www.irs.gov.
    As noted above, States remain free to determine whether to reduce 
UC due to a taxable distribution. If a State chooses to reduce UC due 
to taxable distributions, it must determine that a distribution is in 
fact taxable. Making this determination can be highly technical and 
time consuming, especially because the distribution's tax status is 
controlled by the 60-day timeframe, with the result that the tax status 
of the distribution may not be known until well after the initial 
payment of UC has been made.
    6. Effective Date. According to section 112 of the Worker, Retiree, 
and Employer Recovery Act of 2008, the amendment ``shall take effect as 
if included in the provisions of'' the Pension Protection Act of 2006 
``to which the amendments relate.'' Because the Department recognizes 
that States that are not able to make the change through administrative 
interpretation may need time to introduce and enact conforming 
legislation to meet the requirements of Public Law 110-458, the 
Department will take no enforcement action prior to October 31, 2009.
    7. Effect of Redesignation on Departmental Issuances. As noted 
above, the Worker, Retiree, and Employer Recovery Act of 2008 
redesignated existing provisions of section 3304(a)(15), FUTA. As a 
result, the Department's previous issuances on this section no longer 
necessarily cite the correct paragraphs, clauses, and subclauses. The 
redesignation of these provisions does not affect the Department's 
interpretation of the requirements of Federal law as contained in UIPL 
22-87, its changes, or other departmental issuances, except that UIPL 
22-87, Change 2, has been rescinded.
    8. Action. State administrators should review existing State law 
provisions to assure consistency with Federal UC law requirements and 
take appropriate action to obtain any needed legislation.
    9. Inquiries. Please direct any questions to your Regional Office.

    Dated: This tenth day of August 2009.
Jane Oates,
Assistant Secretary of Labor, Employment and Training Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-19521 Filed 8-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FW-P