alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1055

To amend title 5, United States Code, to clarify that the Government in

the Sunshine Act applies to the Federal Open Market Committee.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 24, 1995

Mr. TRAFICANT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

A BILL

To amend title 5, United States Code, to clarify that the

Government in the Sunshine Act applies to the Federal

Open Market Committee.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sunshine on the Fed5 eral Open Market Committee Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY OF GOVERNMENT IN THE SUN7 SHINE ACT TO THE FEDERAL OPEN MARKET

8 COMMITTEE.

9 Section 552b(a)(1) of title 5, United States Code, is

10 amended by inserting ‘‘and, notwithstanding any other
2

•HR 1055 IH

1 provision of this chapter, includes the Federal Open Mar2 ket Committee’’ before the semicolon at the end.

Æ
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

February 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

128626 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 128626 

 COA: 250332 

Kent CC: 02-011062-FC 

NGOC PHAT TRAN, a/k/a QUANG HANG, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 10, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would hold this case in abeyance for People v Drohan, lv gtd 472 Mich 

881 (2005). 

t0221 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

February 27, 2006 

Clerk
§ 31.3306(c)-1 Employment; services performed before 1955. ( a ) Services performed after 1938 and before 1955 constitute employment under section 3306(c) if such services were employment under the law applicable to the period in which they were performed.
( b ) The tax applies with respect to remuneration paid by an employer after 1954 for services performed after 1938 and before 1955, as well as for services performed after 1954, to the extent that the remuneration and services constitute wages and employment. See §§ 31.3306(b)-1 to 31.3306(b)(8)-1, inclusive, relating to wages.
( c ) Determination of whether services performed after 1938 and before 1955 constitute employment shall be made in accordance with the provisions of law applicable to the period in which they were performed and of the regulations thereunder. The regulations applicable in determining whether services performed after 1938 and before 1955 constitute employment are as follows: ( 1 ) Services performed in 1939—26 CFR (1939) Part 400 (Regulations 90).
( 2 ) Services performed after 1939 and before 1955—26 CFR (1939) Part 403 (Regulations 107).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,487,732
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          37,580
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             2,340,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,529,513
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       6,852,109
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         7,312,281
<LOANS>                                     33,639,096
<ALLOWANCE>                                    342,711
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              47,271,382
<DEPOSITS>                                  39,721,519
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            363,199
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       458,888
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,727,776
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               7,186,664
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              2,513,957
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              310,195
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               134,884
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             2,959,036
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,069,375
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,069,836
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,889,200
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  135,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              26,244
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,099,715
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,182,604
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,182,604
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   819,524
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.64
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.99
<LOANS-NON>                                    119,254
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                818,911
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               273,406
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  104,821
<RECOVERIES>                                    39,126
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              342,711
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           342,711
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### MOSTEN MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC.; Real Estate Operations, Inc., Plaintiffs—Appellees, v. ZURICH-AMERICAN INSURANCE GROUP, Defendant—Appellant. Mosten Management Company, Inc.; Real Estate Operations, Inc., Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. Zurich-American Insurance Group, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 00-15406, 00-15510.

D.C. No. CV-89-03475-CW/PJH.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Feb. 12, 2002.

Decided June 20, 2002.

Before WALLACE, KOZINSKI and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

The district court erred in awarding Mosten attorneys’ fees under *Brandt v.*
      *943
      *Superior Court,*37 Cal.3d 813, 210 Cal.Rptr. 211, 693 P.2d 796 (1985). Mosten initially brought both tort and contract claims against Zurich, but the district court granted Zurich summary judgment as to the latter claim; the only remaining claim was for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. However, *Brandt*fees may not be awarded for recovery on such claims. *Burnaby v. Standard Fire Ins. Co.,*40 Cal.App.4th 787, 47 Cal.Rptr.2d 326, 329 (Ct.App.1995); *United Servs. Auto. Ass’n v. Dalrymple,*232 Cal.App.3d 182, 283 Cal.Rptr. 330, 332 (Ct.App.1991).

Because Mosten can’t satisfy the *Brandt*requirements for its trial fees, it can’t satisfy the same requirements for fees on appeal. The district court therefore did not err in denying Mosten’s application for appellate *Brandt*fees.

AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part. No costs.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts *943of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Circuit Rule 36-3.

PAEZ, Circuit Judge,

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent. I would affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s Order Regarding Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses and Pre-judgment Interest (April 10, 1996), Order Regarding Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses (February 6, 1997), Order Regarding Mosten’s Application for Post-trial *Brandt*Fees and Expenses (December 23, 1998), and Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Application for Appellate *Brandt*Fees (January 28, 2000).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>    5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such on Form 10-QSB
for the nine months period ended September 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           7,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  551,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               558,000
<PP&E>                                      58,173,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              39,983,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,748,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       32,291,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                  (13,543,000)
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,748,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,436,000
<CGS>                                        1,373,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,890,000                     
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,926,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,454,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,454,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,454,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
§ 31.6694-4 Extension of period of collection when tax return preparer pays 15 percent of a penalty for understatement of taxpayer's liability and certain other procedural matters. ( a ) *In general.* For rules relating to the extension of period of collection when a tax return preparer who prepared a return or claim for refund for employment tax under chapters 21 through 25 of subtitle C of the Internal Revenue Code pays 15 percent of a penalty for understatement of taxpayer's liability and procedural matters relating to the investigation, assessment and collection of the penalties under section 6694(a) and (b), the rules under § 1.6694-4 of this chapter will apply.
( b ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section is applicable to returns and claims for refund filed, and advice provided, after December 31, 2008.
[T.D. 9436, 73 FR 78454, Dec. 22, 2008]
# LI2020179EN.01000101.xml

| 9.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | LI 179/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

LI 179/1

---

COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2020/754

of 8 June 2020

extending the mandate of the Head of Mission of the European Union Advisory Mission for Civilian Security Sector Reform Ukraine (EUAM Ukraine)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union and in particular Articles 42(4) and 43(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 22 July 2014, the Council adopted Decision 2014/486/CFSP (1) on the European Union Advisory Mission for Civilian Security Sector Reform Ukraine (EUAM Ukraine). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 22 July 2014, the Council adopted Decision 2014/486/CFSP (1) on the European Union Advisory Mission for Civilian Security Sector Reform Ukraine (EUAM Ukraine).

| (2) | On 13 May 2019, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2019/761 (2) extending the mandate of the Mission until 31 May 2021. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 13 May 2019, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2019/761 (2) extending the mandate of the Mission until 31 May 2021.

| (3) | On 4 June 2019, the Political and Security Committee adopted Decision (CFSP) 2019/992 (3) appointing Mr Antti HARTIKAINEN as Head of Mission for the period from 1 July 2019 until 30 June 2020. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On 4 June 2019, the Political and Security Committee adopted Decision (CFSP) 2019/992 (3) appointing Mr Antti HARTIKAINEN as Head of Mission for the period from 1 July 2019 until 30 June 2020.

| (4) | On 14 May 2020, the Political and Security Committee agreed that Mr Antti HARTIKAINEN should continue to perform this function until 31 May 2021, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

On 14 May 2020, the Political and Security Committee agreed that Mr Antti HARTIKAINEN should continue to perform this function until 31 May 2021,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The mandate of Mr Antti HARTIKAINEN as Head of Mission of EUAM Ukraine is hereby extended until 31 May 2021.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

It shall apply from 1 July 2020.

Done at Brussels, 8 June 2020.

For the Council

The President

A. METELKO-ZGOMBIĆ

---

(1)  Council Decision 2014/486/CFSP of 22 July 2014 on the European Union Advisory Mission for Civilian Security Sector Reform Ukraine (EUAM Ukraine) (OJ L 217, 23.7.2014, p. 42).

1

(2)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/761 of 13 May 2019 amending Decision 2014/486/CFSP on the European Union Advisory Mission for Civilian Security Sector Reform Ukraine (EUAM Ukraine) (OJ L 125, 14.5.2019, p. 16).

2

(3)  Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2019/992 of 4 June 2019 on the appointment of the Head of Mission of the European Union Advisory Mission for Civilian Security Sector Reform Ukraine (EUAM Ukraine) (EUAM Ukraine/1/2019) (OJ L 160, 18.6.2019, p. 24).

3

---
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 78 FR 60697, Oct. 2, 2013.

#### § 245.9 Procedural instructions.

The Commissioner of the Bureau of the Fiscal Service may issue procedural instructions, implementing these regulations, in Volume I, Part 4 of the Treasury Financial Manual.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134256 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134256 

 COA: 275626 

Muskegon CC: 02-047857-FC

ALPHONSO SONES, SR.,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 12, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

t1022 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 29, 2007 

 Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SIX MONTH YEAR TO DATE SUMMARY FINANCIAL INORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM AMERICAN BIOGENETIC SCIENCES,INC. 1998 10-Q FOR THE SECOND
QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1998
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       7,661,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  306,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    445,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,435,000
<PP&E>                                       2,325,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,628,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,649,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,213,000
<BONDS>                                      3,802,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,445,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,649,000
<SALES>                                        441,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               441,000
<CGS>                                          142,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  142,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,076,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             176,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,913,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,913,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,913,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.14)
        

</TABLE>
www.gpo.gov

### §653. Statutes of limitations unavailable against claims; amount of decree; set-off

If any claim or claims be submitted to said courts, they shall settle the equitable rights therein, notwithstanding lapse of time or statutes of limitation or the fact that the said claim or claims have not been presented to any other tribunal, including the commission created by the Act of March 3, 1851 (Ninth Statutes at Large, page 631): *Provided*, That any decree for said Indians shall be for an amount equal to the just value of the compensation provided or proposed for the Indians in those certain eighteen unratified treaties executed by the chiefs and head men of the several tribes and bands of Indians of California and submitted to the Senate of the United States by the President of the United States for ratification on the 1st day of June, 1852, including the lands described therein at $1.25 per acre. Any payment which may have been made by the United States or moneys heretofore or hereafter expended to date of award for the benefit of the Indians of California, made under specific appropriations for the support, education, health, and civilization of Indians in California, including purchases of land, shall not be pleaded as an estoppel but may be pleaded by way of set-off.

(May 18, 1928, ch. 624, §3, 45 Stat. 602.)

#### References in Text

Act of March 3, 1851, referred to in text, is act Mar. 3, 1851, ch. 41, 9 Stat. 631, which was not classified to the Code.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 111 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 277
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 111

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 8, 1995

    Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and 
                             Administration

                           December 14, 1995

               Reported by Mr. Warner, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for the appointment of Anne D'Harnoncourt as a citizen regent 
        of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 
43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian 
Institution, in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by 
reason of the expiration of the term of Samuel Curtis 
Johnson of Wisconsin on December 4, 1995, is filled by the appointment 
of Anne D'Harnoncourt of Pennsylvania. The appointment is for a term of 
six years and shall take effect on December 5, 1995.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 7, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 277

104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 111

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

Providing for the appointment of Anne D'Harnoncourt as a citizen regent 
        of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           December 14, 1995

                       Reported without amendment
```