alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 7378

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. KENDRICK WILLIAMS , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Terrence W. Boyle , Chief District Judge. ( 5:15

- cr - 00031

- BO

- 1; 5:19

- cv - 00071

- BO )

Submitted : February 18, 2020 Decided: March 30, 2020

Before KEENAN and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Kendrick Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kendrick Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 225 5 (201 8 ) motion . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)( B ) (201 8 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of th e denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (201 8 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find the district court’s assessment of the constit utional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v.
Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the motion s tates a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473,
484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argumen t would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
#### In the Matter of Ryon J.G., Appellant, v Carlton D.S., Respondent.

[803 NYS2d 467]

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Onondaga County (William J. Burke, J.H.O.), entered July 26, 2004 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 5. The order dismissed the petition.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is denied, the petition is reinstated and the matter is remitted to Family Court, Onondaga County, for further proceedings on the petition.

Memorandum: The record before us contains no order of reference, nor does it indicate that the parties consented to submit the proceeding to a Judicial Hearing Officer (JHO). We therefore conclude that the JHO was without authority to dismiss the petition *{see Nguyen v Prime Residential Bronx R&R V,*307 AD2d 201 [2003]; *Fernald v Vinci,*303 AD2d 547 [2003]; *Matter of Myndi O. v Ronald K.,*180 Misc 2d 608, 611-612 [1999]). Thus, we reverse the order, deny respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition, reinstate the petition, and remit the matter to Family Court for further proceedings on the petition. Present—Green, J.P., Gorski, Smith, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Delegation of Authority No. 321]

      ( print page 5207)    
By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of State by the laws of the United States, including the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, the Arms Export Control Act, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998, and Section 1 of the State Department Basic Authorities Act (22 U.S.C. 2651a), and delegated to me by Delegation of Authority 245, dated April 23, 2001, I hereby delegate to Stephen D. Mull of the Office of the Under Secretary for Political Affairs, to the extent authorized by law, all authorities vested in the Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security, including all authorities vested in the Secretary of State that have been or may be delegated or redelegated to that Under Secretary.

Any authorities covered by this delegation are also hereby delegated to the Deputy Secretary for Management and Resources, the Under Secretary for Political Affairs and the Under Secretary for Management, and may also be exercised by the Secretary and the Deputy Secretary. Nothing in this delegation of authority shall be deemed to supersede any existing delegation of authority, which shall remain in full force and effect during and after this delegation.

This delegation shall become effective at noon on January 20, 2009, and shall expire upon the appointment and entry upon duty of a subsequently appointed individual to serve as Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security.

                    This memorandum shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: January 16, 2009.

John D. Negroponte,

Deputy Secretary of State.

[FR Doc. E9-1935 Filed 1-28-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
#### § 31.6011(a)-10 Instructions to forms may waive filing requirement in case of no liability tax returns.

Notwithstanding provisions in this part which require that a tax return be filed, the instructions to the form on which a return of tax is otherwise required by this part to be made may waive such requirement with respect to a particular class or classes of no liability tax returns. Returns in a class for which such requirement has been so waived need not be made.

This Treasury decision is not adverse to any taxpayer. For this reason, it is found unnecessary to issue this Treasury decision with notice and public procedure under subsection (b) of section 553 of title 5 of the United States Code or subject to the effective date limitation of subsection (d) of that section.

[T.D. 8229, 53 FR 35811, Sept. 15, 1988]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 149 Introduced in House (IH)]

  2d Session
H. J. RES. 149

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1996, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 1996

Mr. Obey introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1996, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That section 106(c) of Public 
Law 104-56 is amended by striking ``December 15, 1995'' and inserting 
``August 31, 1996''.
                                 <all>
```
IB

Union Calendar No. 171

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1290

[Report No. 104–320]

To reinstate the permit for, and extend the deadline under the Federal

Power Act applicable to the construction of, a hydroelectric project in

Oregon, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 22, 1995

Mr. COOLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Commerce

NOVEMBER 7, 1995

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic]

A BILL

To reinstate the permit for, and extend the deadline under

the Federal Power Act applicable to the construction

of, a hydroelectric project in Oregon, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1290 RH

1 SECTION 1. REINSTATEMENT OF PERMIT EXTENSION

2 DEADLINE.

3 Notwithstanding the expiration of the permit and

4 notwithstanding the time period specified in section 13 of

5 the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would other6 wise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

7 project numbered 7829, the Commission shall, at the re8 quest of the licensee for the project, reinstate the permit

9 effective May 23, 1993, and extend the time period during

10 which the licensee is required to commence the construc11 tion of the project to the date that is 4 years after the

12 date of the enactment of this Act.

13 SECTION 1. REINSTATEMENT OF PERMIT EXTENSION

14 DEADLINE.

15 Notwithstanding the expiration of the permit and not16 withstanding the time period specified in section 13 of the

17 Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise

18 apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

19 project numbered 7829, the Commission shall, at the request

20 of the licensee for the project, reinstate the permit effective

21 May 23, 1993, and extend the time period during which

22 the licensee is required to commence the construction of the

23 project so as to terminate on May 25, 1999.

Union Calendar No. 171

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1290

[Report No. 104–320]

A BILL

To reinstate the permit for, and extend the deadline

egon, and for other purposes.construction of, a hydroelectric project in Orunder the Federal Power Act applicable to the

NOVEMBER 7, 1995

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Commitordered to be printed tee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and
# Continuation of Emergency Regarding Export Control Regulations

                        On August 17, 2001, consistent with the authority provided to the President under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701*et seq.),*                         the President issued Executive Order 13222. In that order, he declared a national emergency with respect to the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States in light of the expiration of the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended (50 U.S.C. App. 2401                         *et seq.).*                         Because the Export Administration Act has not been renewed by the Congress, the national emergency declared on August 17, 2001, must continue in effect beyond August 17, 2009. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13222.                    

                        This notice shall be published in the                         *Federal Register*                         and transmitted to the Congress.                    

[FR Doc. E9-19775

Billing code 3195-W9-P
§ 16.38 Reconsideration of initial decision. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, any party may file a motion for reconsideration of the initial decision within 20 days of receipt of the initial decision. If service was made by mail, receipt will be presumed to be five days from the date of mailing in the absence of contrary proof.
( b ) Every such motion must set forth the matters claimed to have been erroneously decided and the nature of the alleged errors. Such motion shall be accompanied by a supporting brief.
( c ) Responses to such motions shall be allowed only upon request of the ALJ.
( d ) No party may file a motion for reconsideration of an initial decision that has been revised in response to a previous motion for reconsideration.
( e ) The ALJ may dispose of a motion for reconsideration by denying it or by issuing a revised initial decision.
( f ) When a motion for reconsideration is made, the time periods for appeal to the authority head contained in § 16.38, and for finality of the initial decision in § 16.36(d), shall begin on the date the ALJ issues the denial of the motion for reconsideration or a revised initial decision, as appropriate.
DAVID F. SHAYNE FAA OFFICE OF REGIONAL COUNSEL 1601 LIND AVE., SW RENTON, WASlUNGTON 98057 TELEPHONE: (425) 227-2165 FACSIMILE: (425)227-1007 

## -**~** 

## 20!5 HEARING

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Inthe Matter of: William A. Curtright DocketNo. FAA-2015-1319 FAA Case No. 2014NM090046 Judge J. E. Sullivan COMPLAINANT'S SUPPEMENTAL PLEADING Complainant hereby responds to the ALJ's Order ofOctober 21,2015, inthe above-captioned matter as follows: 1. Proofofservice via certifiedmail return receipt requested is attached hereto. 2. Complainant acknowledges that the ALJ's calculation ofRespondent's last day to have filed a timely Answer as being June 23, 2015 is correct. Forthe reasons previously set forth, Complainant requests its Motionto Dismiss the appeal be granted.**Respectfullys~bmitted** this 291 h day ofOctober 2015. r;


### DAVID F. SHAYNE FAAAttorney

COMPLAINANT'S SUPPLEMENTAL PLEADING FAAv. William A. Curtright DocketNo. FAA-2015-13!9 FAA Case No. 20!4NM090046 Page I of2 DAVID F. SHAYNE. FAA ATTORNEY TEL: (425) 227-2165; FAX: (425) 227-1007

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certifY thatthe foregoing Complainant's Supplemental Pleading has been served as designated by the recipient this date, to the following: Judge J.E. Sullivan (Facsimile and First Class Mail) U.S. Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Ave., S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, D.C. 20590 Fax: (202) 366-7536 Federal Aviation Administration (Facsimile and First Class Mail) 800 Independence Avenue SW Washington, D.C. 20591 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2W1000 Fax: (202) 267-1293 William A. Curtright (First Class Mail) P.O. Box 1350 Jefferson, OR 97352 Dated this 291 h day ofOctober 2015.

Terri Kirk ' Office ofRegional Counsel (ANM-7) Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Ave. SW Renton, WA 98057 (425) 227-2007

COMPLAJNANT"S SUPPLEMENTAL PLEADING FAAv. William A. Curtright DAVIDF. SHAYNE. FAAATTORNEY TEL: (425) 227-2165; FAX: (425) 227-1007 Docket No. FAA-2015-1319 FAA Case No. 20 14NM090046 Page 2 of2SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION • Complete items 1,

**2~** and 3. Also complete

item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. • Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. • Attach this card to the back ofthe mailpiece,

or on the .front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: 

### William

### A. Curtright P.O. Box 1350 Jefferson, OR 97352 COMPLETETHIS SECTION ON DELIVERY Agent Addressee

3. Service Type

**~Certified** MaiJ® 0 Priority Mail Express""' D Registered 0 Return Receipt for Merchandise D Insured Mail 0 Collect on Delivery 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ,[] ye!" 2. Article Number (Transferfrom service fat 

### 7013 2250 0002 0203 0485 PS Form 3811, July 2013 

### D

**~** Domestic Return Receipt 

### Clc.'>'Yt "f:CA·;,_)----
September 20, 2016

Exemption No. 13057B

Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–2881

Mr. Jeff Taylor

VP of Insurance Services Office, Inc.

Insurance Services Office, Inc.

1122 W Traverse Pkwy

Lehi, UT 84043

Dear Mr. Taylor:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition for an amendment. It explains 

the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists any changes to the original conditions 

and limitations.

By letter dated March 22, 2016, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Insurance Services Office, Inc. (hereinafter petitioner or operator) for an amendment 

to your current exemption. That exemption from §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 

61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 

91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 

allows the petitioner to conduct UAS operations. You requested an amendment to change the 

company name from Xactware Solutions, Inc. to Insurance Services Office, Inc.1

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested amendment to the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner. 

 

1 The petitioner also requested to add aircraft. At this time, the FAA is unable to act on this request. When the 

FAA is ready to act, we will proceed accordingly and no further action will be required by the petitioner.
2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 13057A

remains valid and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority contained 

in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, the operator is 

granted an amendment to change the operator name.

The operator shall add this amendment to its original exemption.

 

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of amendment, Insurance Services Office, Inc. is hereafter referred to as the 

operator. All conditions and limitations within Grant of Exemption No. 13057A remain in 

effect. 

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be 

grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption. 

This exemption terminates on October 31, 2017, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Director, Flight Standards Service
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                    5


<S>                                                  <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                         MAR-31-2001
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     1,600
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                2,000,625
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1,100
<COMMON>                                             186
<OTHER-SE>                                           (2,000,311)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         1,600
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     77,225
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (77,225)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (78,025)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      971,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         892,975
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (6.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (6.07)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.22


    
      

    


    Exhibit
      10.22

    


    Summary
      of Director Compensation for Fiscal 2007

    


    Each
      member of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) who is not an employee of
      Tredegar or any of its subsidiaries receives
      $1,500 for attendance at each Board meeting with respect to which such director
      participates. The non-executive/non-employee Chairman of the Board of Directors
      receives an additional $500 for attendance at each Board meeting. Each director
      who is a member of Tredegar’s Audit Committee, Executive Committee (non-employee
      directors only), Executive Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance
      Committee (the “Committees”), including the chairperson of each such Committee,
receives
      $1,250 for attendance at each meeting of the Committee with respect to which
      such director participates. A
      director who participates in a Board or Committee meeting by telephone receives
      $500 for such meeting, with the exception of any Committee chairperson who
      is
      paid $750 for telephonic participation.

    


    In
      addition to individual meeting fees, each Board member receives an annual
      retainer of $16,000 plus 400 shares of Tredegar common stock. The
      non-executive/non-employee Chairman of the Board receives an additional annual
      retainer of $8,000. These retainers are payable in equal quarterly
      installments.

    


    In
      addition to individual Committee meeting fees, the Committee chairpersons
      receive the following annual retainers, payable in equal quarterly installments
      commencing after their election to such position by the Board:

    


    
      	
              Audit
                Committee Chairperson

            	 	
              $

            	
              5,000

            	 
	
              Executive
                Compensation Committee Chairperson

            	 	
              $

            	
              2,000

            	 
	
              Nominating
                & Governance Committee Chairperson

            	 	
              $

            	
              2,000