alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting.

*Time and Dates:*

9 a.m.-5 p.m., August 5, 2009 (closed).

9 a.m.-5 p.m., August 6, 2009 (closed).

9 a.m.-5 p.m., August 7, 2009 (closed).

*Place:*                         Westin Hotel, 3377 Peachtree Road, NE., Atlanta, GA, 30326, Telephone (678) 500-3100.                    

*Status:*                         The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.                    

*Matters To Be Discussed:*                         The meeting will include the review, discussion, and evaluation of the application received in response to “Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Research Centers, Special Interest Project Competitive Supplements (SIPS) (U48 Panels N, O and P), RFA-DP09-101SUPP09, initial review.”                    

*Contact Person for More Information:*                         Brenda Colley-Gilbert, Ph.D., Director, Extramural Research Program Office, CCH, 47770 Buford Highway, MS K-92, Atlanta, GA 30341, Telephone (770) 488-8390.                    

                        The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                    

Elaine L. Baker,

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. E9-19293 Filed 8-12-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
MEMORANDUM

TO: Air and Radiation Docket EPA - HQ - OAR- 2012 - 0401 FROM: EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality DATE: December 19 , 2013 SUBJECT: Teleconference with Edeniq, Inc. On December 9, 2013, Office of Transportation and Air Quality (OTAQ) staff held a teleconference with staff of Edeniq, Inc. This memorandum provides written documentation and a brief summary

of this teleconference. This teleconference discussed Edeniq technologies used to convert cellulosic material to ethanol as relative to the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: RFS Pathways II and Technical Amendments to the RFS 2 Standards (Docket ID EPA - HQ - OAR2012 - 0401 ). OTAQ staff participating included Dallas Burkholder, Shary n Lie, Vincent Camobreco, Robert Larson, Christopher Ramig, Jon Monger, Aaron Levy, Michael Prince, and AAAS fellows Lauren Rafelski and David Babson. Edeniq repr esentatives included Tom Griffin, CTO; Scott Crane, SVP North America; Steve Rust, VP Sales & Marketing; Dan Michalopoulos, VP of Technology ; Richard Woods - VP of Commercialization; Ed Childs, Director of Engineering; and Kris Ramos, R&D Section Head.
§ 54.9801-5 Evidence of creditable coverage. ( a ) *In general.* The rules for providing certificates of creditable coverage and demonstrating creditable coverage have been superseded by the prohibition on preexisting condition exclusions. *See* section 2704 of the Public Health Service Act, incorporated into section 9815 of the Code, and its implementing regulations for rules prohibiting the imposition of a preexisting condition exclusion.
( b ) *Applicability.* The provisions of this section apply beginning December 31, 2014.
[T.D. 9656, 79 FR 10305, Feb. 24, 2014]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1107 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1107

 To direct the Secretary of the Army to develop a watershed management 
   plan for the Lake George area of Indiana, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 1, 1995

Mr. Visclosky introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of the Army to develop a watershed management 
   plan for the Lake George area of Indiana, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Secretary of 
the Army, in cooperation with the Soil Conservation Service of the 
Department of Agriculture, shall develop a watershed management plan 
for the Deep River Basin, Indiana, which includes Deep River, Lake 
George, Turkey Creek, and other related tributaries in Indiana. The 
plan developed by the Secretary shall address specific concerns related 
to the Deep River Basin area, including sediment flow into Deep River, 
Turkey Creek, and other tributaries; control of sediment quality in 
Lake George; flooding problems; the safety of the Lake George Dam; and 
wetlands management.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 49.0-1 Introduction.

The regulations in this part 49 are designated “Facilities and Services Excise Tax Regulations.” The regulations relate to the taxes on communications and transportation by air imposed by chapter 33 of the Internal Revenue Code and the taxes on indoor tanning services imposed by section 5000B. See part 40 of this chapter for regulations relating to returns, payments, and deposits of these taxes.

[T.D. 9621, 78 FR 34876, June 11, 2013]
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Fl  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Trust and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 26, 2016, byand among J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., as Depositor,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Servicer and Special Servicer, WellsFargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator and WilmingtonTrust, National Association, as Trustee with respect to Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates Series 2016-NINE (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 13.7 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.            A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from September 26,2016 through December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and 

 

2.            To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
#### Holup v. Holup et al.

*Stephen E. Gombar,*for plaintiff.

*Martin J. Kushmeriok,*for defendants.

December 17, 1952.

Eagen, J.,

This is a motion for judgment upon the pleadings in an action to quiet title.

The facts are set forth in a previous opinion filed in this case as of October 24,1952. The legal question raised is whether or not a sale of realty by the county commissioners with the approval of the court under *366the provisions of the Act of May 21, 1937, P. L. 787, as amended, 72 PS *§5878(a)*et seq., of land bought in at tax sale, to one of several former record owners or cotenants inures to the benefit of all such owners. We are all of the one mind that it does.

It is clearly the law in Pennsylvania that where real property is purchased at a tax sale by any political subdivision, any person having the right to redeem the property retains such right so long as the title remains in the political subdivision. Where one of several co-tenants of realty so sold for taxes redeems it during such period, he does so for the benefit of all eotenants. The purchasing cotenant acquires no greater interest in the property than held before, except the added right and claim against the other cotenants for reimbursement. Under such circumstances, it is presumed that the one acts for all: Hunt et vir v. Mestrezat, 361 Pa. 415.

Plaintiff’s counsel ingeniously argues that under the provisions of the Act of 1937, supra, the court may direct in the present instance, that the county convey complete title to one of the former record owners to the exclusion of all other tenants in common. We do not agree that this is so despite the language of the statute involved.

Within our knowledge, no case has specifically ruled upon the legal effect of such a conveyance under the Act of 1937 and its amendments. However, considering the history of and the reason for the rule and the extent to which the Pennsylvania appellate courts have gone in protecting the relationship existing among cotenants, we believe that one cotenant cannot even, under the Act of 1937, purchase the land and hold adversely against his fellow owners.

Therefore, December 17, 1952, judgment in favor of defendant Anna Holup Gavala is entered upon the pleadings.
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Corey Smith, Respondent.

[808 NYS2d 8]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ruth Pickholz, J.), rendered February 1, 2005, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3V2 years, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of vacating the sentence and remanding to Supreme Court for resentencing in accordance with the decision herein, and otherwise affirmed.

Defendant committed this crime before the effective date of the Drug Law Reform Act (L 2004, ch 738) but was sentenced after that date. The sentencing court erred when it invoked the amelioration doctrine of *People v Behlog*(74 NY2d 237 [1989]) *281to give defendant the benefit of the reduced penalty contained in the new law. We have concluded that for purposes of the Drug Law Reform Act, the Legislature intended to negate the amelioration doctrine *(People v Nelson,*21 AD3d 861 [2005]). Accordingly, we remand for resentencing in accordance with the law applicable at the time of the crime. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, Gonzalez and Malone, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Karrielinn M. Cable, Respondent, v Thomas L. Hill, Appellant.

[804 NYS2d 429]

*653In a support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, Thomas L. Hill appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Blass, J.), dated March 15, 2005, which confirmed a determination of the same court (Buetow, S.M.) dated February 25, 2005, finding, after a hearing, that he willfully failed to pay court-ordered child support, adjudicated him in contempt, and thereupon committed him to a period of incarceration of six months unless he purged himself of contempt by paying the sum of $19,774.65.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

A Support Magistrate may assume an active role in the examination of witnesses where proper or necessary to facilitate or expedite the orderly progress of the hearing *(see Bielicki v T.J. Bentey, Inc.,*267 AD2d 266, 267 [1999]; *Givens v Sinert,*243 AD2d 443, 444 [1997]; *Accardi v City of New York,*121 AD2d 489, 491 [1986]). As the Support Magistrate asked questions in order to clarify the appellant’s testimony, she did not unduly interfere with the presentation of the appellant’s case or indicate any partiality or bias which would warrant reversal.

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Cozier, J.P., Krausman, Skelos and Lunn, JJ., concur.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19-604V

UNPUBLISHED

MICHAEL BRENT KLUSMAN,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: May 11, 2020

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS)

William Patrick Ronan, III, The Ronan Law Firm, Overland Parks, KS, for petitioner.

Ida Nassar, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On April 23, 2019, Michael Brent Klusman filed a petition for compensation under 

the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2 (the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered Guillain-Barre Syndrome (“GBS”) as 

a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccination administered on November 8, 2017. Petition 

at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special 

Masters.

On April 30, 2020, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes

that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report

at 1. Specifically, Respondent has reviewed the petition and medical records, and it is 

 1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am 

required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the EGovernment Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to 

the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to 

redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of 

privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such 

material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
2

his position that Petitioner suffered from GBS. Id. at 6. Respondent further agrees that 

Petitioner has satisfied the criteria set forth in the revised Vaccine Injury Table and the

Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation. Id.

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7294

ROBERTO ORTEGA,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

SHERWOOD R. MCCABE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District

Judge. (CA-03-975)

Submitted: December 9, 2004 Decided: December 15, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roberto Ortega, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Roberto Ortega, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the

district court’s order accepting the report and recommendation of

a magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(2000) petition. An appeal may not be taken from the final order

in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Ortega has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1108 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1108

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
    coastwise trade and on the Great Lakes and their tributary and 
     connecting waters in trade with Canada for each of two barges.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 1, 1995

   Mr. Roth introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
    coastwise trade and on the Great Lakes and their tributary and 
     connecting waters in trade with Canada for each of two barges.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the 
Act of June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and sections 12106 and 12107 
of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may 
issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for 
employment in the coastwise trade and on the Great Lakes and their 
tributary and connecting waters in trade with Canada, for each of two 
barges owned by Roen Salvage (a company incorporated under the laws of 
the State of Wisconsin and having its principal place of business in 
Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin) and numbered 103 and 203 by Roen Salvage.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 157 (Monday, August 17, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 41420]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19611]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13403-000]


Clean River Power MR-4, LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit 
Application Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To 
Intervene, and Competing Applications

August 6, 2009.
    On March 25, 2009, Clean River Power MR-4, LLC filed an 
application, pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act, 
proposing to study the feasibility of the Luke's Chute Lock and Dam 
Water Power Project, to be located at the State of Ohio's Luke's Chute 
Lock and Dam on the Muskingum River in Washington County, Ohio.
    The proposed Luke's Chute Lock and Dam Project would consist of: 
(1) The existing 19.7-foot-high, 546-foot-long concrete dam; (2) the 
existing 490-acre reservoir with a 3,345 acre-foot storage capacity; 
(3) a new 150-foot-long, 120-foot-wide intake structure; (4) a 200-
foot-long, 120-foot-wide power canal; (5) a new powerhouse containing 
three proposed generating units with a total installed capacity of 3.9 
megawatts; (6) a new 150-foot-long tailrace; (7) a new switchyard 
containing a single three-phase step-up transformer; and (8) a new 
1,500-foot-long, 34.5-kilovolt overhead transmission line. The project 
would have an estimated average annual generation of 15,600 megawatt-
hours.
    Applicant Contact: Mr. Alan Skelly, 8425 Beechmont Avenue, 
Cincinnati, OH 45255, phone (513) 375-9242.
    FERC Contact: Michael Spencer, (202) 502-6093.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing 
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file 
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice. 
Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing 
applications may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site 
under the ``e-Filing'' link. If unable to be filed electronically, 
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight 
copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For 
more information on how to submit these types of filings please go to 
the Commission's Web site located at http://www.ferc.gov/filing-comments.asp. More information about this project can be viewed or 
printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number (P-
13403) in the docket number field to access the document. For 
assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-19611 Filed 8-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. REVISED JANUARY 22, 1999

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-20142 Summary Calendar

BILLY ROSS SIMS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus L. BAIRD; ET AL, Defendants, M. LILES; J. GODWIN; RICHARD G. BELANGER; JERRY PETERSON; BEVERLY STEWART; CHARLES D. ADAMS; BOYD, Captain, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-91-CV-2250

- - - - - - - - - - December 18, 1998 Before DAVIS, DUHE’, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Billy Ross Sims, Texas prisoner # 511649, appeals the district
court’s grant of s ummary judgment dismissing his claims under 42
U.S.C. § 1983. Sims's motion to strike the appellees' brief isDENIED. Having reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties

and finding no error, we AFFIRM.
AFFIRMED; MOTION TO STRIKE BRIEF DENIED.