alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 509.108 Dividends. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) The rate of United States tax imposed by the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 upon dividends derived from sources within the United States by a nonresident alien individual who is a resident of Switzerland, or by a Swiss corporation or other entity, shall not exceed 15 percent under the provisions of Article VI of the convention, if such alien, corporation, or other entity at no time during the taxable year in which such dividends are derived has a permanent establishment in the United States.
( 2 ) If, for example, a nonresident alien individual who is a resident of Switzerland performs personal services within the United States during the taxable year, but has at no time during such year a permanent establishment within the United States, he is entitled to the reduced rate of tax with respect to dividends derived in that year from United States sources, as provided in Article VI of the convention, even though under the provisions of section 871(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 he has engaged in trade or business within the United States during such year by reason of his having performed personal services therein.
( b ) *Dividends paid by related corporation.* The rate of United States tax imposed by the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 upon dividends derived from sources within the United States by a Swiss corporation shall not exceed 5 percent under the provisions of Article VI (2) of the convention if: ( 1 ) The Swiss corporation is a shareholder which controls, directly or indirectly, at the time the dividend is paid 95 percent or more of the entire voting power in the corporation paying the dividend;
( 2 ) Not more than 25 percent of the gross income of the paying corporation for the three-year period immediately preceding the taxable year in which the dividend is paid consists of dividends and interest (other than dividends and interest received by such paying corporation from its own subsidiary corporations, if any);
( 3 ) The relationship between the paying corporation and the Swiss corporation has not been arranged or maintained primarily with the intention of securing the reduced rate of 5 percent; and
( 4 ) The Swiss corporation at no time during the taxable year in which such dividends are derived has a permanent establishment in the United States.
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.6656-1 Abatement of penalty. ( a ) *Exception for first time depositors of employment taxes* — ( 1 ) *Waiver.* The Secretary will generally waive the penalty imposed by section 6656(a) on a person's failure to deposit any employment tax under subtitle C of the Internal Revenue Code if— ( i ) The failure is inadvertent;
( ii ) The person meets the requirements referred to in section 7430(c)(4)(A)(ii) (relating to the net worth requirements applicable for awards of attorney's fees);
( iii ) The failure occurs during the first quarter that the person is required to deposit any employment tax; and
( iv ) The return of the tax is filed on or before the due date.
( 2 ) *Inadvertent failure.* For purposes of paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section, the Secretary will determine if a failure to deposit is inadvertent based on all the facts and circumstances.
( b ) *Deposit sent to Secretary.* The Secretary may abate the penalty imposed by section 6656(a) if the first time a taxpayer is required to make a deposit, the amount required to be deposited is inadvertently sent to the Secretary rather than deposited by electronic funds transfer.
( c ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section applies to deposits and payments made after December 31, 2010.
[T.D. 8725, 62 FR 39118, July 22, 1997. Redesignated by T.D. 8947, 66 FR 32542, June 15, 2001; T.D. 9507, 75 FR 75904, Dec. 7, 2010]
## F IFTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE O F 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D 20 23-2 974 LT Case No. 2 023

- CF-0 00794

_____________________________ W ILLIE B. L AWSON , Appella nt,

v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee

.

_____________________________

On a ppeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County. Lisa D. Herndon, Judge.
Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and John M. Selden, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley M oody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Daniel P. Caldwell , Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. August 1 6, 2024

W ALLIS , J.
In this Anders appeal, 1 we affirm Appellant’s judgment and sentence. However, the written judgment reads that Appellant

1 Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967).2 “entered a plea of Not Guilty” to the crime of “Grand Theft of Motor Vehicle.” The record establishes that Appellant proceeded to a trial where he was found guilty of the crime of Theft of Statutory Property

— Motor Vehicle. Accordingly , we remand this case for the trial court to correct the scrivener’s error in the written judgment to reflect the crime for which Appellant was found and adjudicated guilty , after a trial, of Theft of Statutory Property

— Motor Vehicle

. See Anderson v. State , 374 So. 3d 940 ( Fla. 5th DCA 2023).
A FFIRMED

. R EMANDED with instructions.

H ARRIS and B OATWRIGHT , JJ., concur
.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331
.

_____________________________
Statement Pursuant to Section
906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, Richard Rubin, CEO, CFO and
Chairman of American Biogenetic Sciences, Inc, a Delaware corporation, hereby makes the
following certification as required by Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
with respect to the following of this report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934: Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June
30, 2007.

The undersigned certifies that the above
quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the above report fairly presents, in
all respects, the financial condition of American Biogenetic Sciences, Inc. and results of
its operations.

Date: August 12, 2008/s/ Richard RubinCEO, CFO and Chairman
39585.

#### UNITED STATES CASUALTY COMPANY et al. v. THOMAS et al.

Decided January 9, 1963.

*Woodruff, Latimer, Saveli, Lane & Williams, John M. Williams,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Clyde W. Henley, Leon 8. Epstein,*contra.

Per Curiam.

The judgment of this court (106 Ga. App. 441, 127 SE2d 169) having been reversed by the Supreme Court of Georgia *(Thomas v. U. S. Cas. Co.,*218 Ga. 493, 128 SE2d 749), our judgment is hereby vacated, and the judgment of the superior court is affirmed in accordance with that of the Supreme Court.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Carlisle, P. J., Eberhardt and Bussell, JJ., concur.*
ATTACHMENT B: IEPS REPORTING SYSTEM PROPOSED SCREENS

INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL 

PUBLIC POLICY (IIPP)

POSTGRADUATE

AGGREGATE DATA

CFDA NUMBER: 84.269A

IEPS REPORTING SYSTEM PROPOSED

SCREENS
IIPP Project Director - Postgraduate Aggregate Data for Award Number: ___________

The Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008 requires that the Secretary of Education assist grantees in developing a survey to

administer to students to determine postgraduate employment, education, or training. Grantees are required to administer the survey

once every two years and report the results to the Secretary.

Click on the Post Aggregate Data link below to access the screen to enter your survey data. Click here to view sample survey

questions that you may use. You are welcome to add questions to the survey. The survey will not be administered via IRIS. You

should use your own survey process for reaching former fellows. Only the aggregate results of your survey will be reported in

IRIS.

Click on the List of Fellows link to download an Excel spreadsheet of your fellows. Note that the spreadsheet is a cumulative list

of fellows for successive reporting periods.

Action Award Period Due Date Download

Postgraduate Aggregate Data 2009-2010 10/1/2011 List of Fellows

Postgraduate Aggregate Data 2009-2012 10/1/2013 List of Fellows

Postgraduate Aggregate Data 2009-2014 10/1/2015 List of Fellows

Postgraduate Aggregate Data 2009-2016 10/1/2017 List of Fellows

Postgraduate Aggregate Data 2009-2018 10/1/2019 List of Fellows

IEPS - International Resource Information System (IRIS)
IIPP Postgraduate Aggregate Data

Please complete the information below. Click here to view a list of suggested survey questions.

Employment:

How many fellows did you contact?

How many responded?

How many are currently employed?

 Of the number employed, how many indicated they are using the training they received during their IIPP fellowship?

Please fill in the fellows’ employment sectors in the table below.

Sector Bachelor's Master's Doctorate

Elementary or secondary education

Federal government

Foreign government

Graduate study

Higher education

International organization (in U.S.)

International organization (outside U.S.)

Private sector (for profit)

Private sector (non-profit)

State or local government

Unemployed or out of job market

Unknown

U.S. military

Total Students Placed

Total Students Awarded Degrees 0 0 0

IEPS - International Resource Information System (IRIS)
Please indicate the languages studies by the fellows who responded to the survey.

Language Number of Fellows

Education or Training:

Which degrees did the fellows receive as a result of IIPP support?

Discipline Bachelor's Master's Doctorate

How many received additional degrees or certificates?

Bachelor's Master's Doctorate

How many additional degrees or certificates had a language component?

How many additional degrees or certificates had an area or international studies component?

IEPS - International Resource Information System (IRIS)
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1014 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1014

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

                                 An Act

 
      To authorize extension of time limitation for a FERC-issued 
                         hydroelectric license.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
the time limitation of section 13 of the Federal Power Act, the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, upon the request of the licensee for FERC 
Project No. 3701, is authorized, in accordance with the good faith, due 
diligence, and public interest requirements of section 13 and the 
Commission's procedures under such section, to extend the time required 
for the licensee to commence the construction of such project for up to 
a maximum of 3 consecutive 2-year periods. This section shall take 
effect for the project upon the expiration of the extension (issued by 
the Commission under section 13) of the period required for 
commencement of construction of such project. If the license for FERC 
Project 3701 should expire prior to the date of enactment of this Act, 
the Commission is authorized and directed to reinstate effective June 
1, 1995, the license previously issued for such project.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

June 26, 2012

Order 

June 26, 2012

Rehearing No. 582

4 December 2011

142615

DOREEN JOSEPH,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 142615

v COA: 302508

Macomb CC: 2009-005726-CK

A.C.I.A.,

Defendant-Appellant.

_______________________________

On order of the Court, the motion for rehearing is considered, and it is DENIED.

CAVANAGH, MARILYN KELLY and HATHAWAY, JJ., would grant rehearing.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Environmental Protection Agency [FRL-8940-5]
 AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
 ACTION: Notice of availability.
 SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of the administrative record file for comment on 8 TMDLs and the calculations for these TMDLs prepared by EPA Region 6 for waters listed in the State of Arkansas under Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act (CWA).
 DATES: Comments must be submitted in writing to EPA on or before September 11, 2009.
 ADDRESSES: Comments on the 8 TMDLs should be sent to Ms. Diane Smith, Environmental Protection Specialist, Water Quality Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 6, 1445 Ross Ave., Dallas, TX 75202-2733, facsimile (214) 665-7373, or e-mail: 
                        *smith.diane@epa.gov.*
                         For further information, contact Diane Smith at (214) 665-2145. Documents from the administrative record file for these TMDLs are available for public inspection at this address as well. Documents from the administrative record file may be viewed at 
                        *http://www.epa.gov/​region6/​water/​npdes/​tmdl/​index.htm,*
                         or obtained by calling (214) 665-2145 or writing Ms. Smith at the above address. Please contact Ms. Smith to schedule an inspection.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diane Smith at (214) 665-2145.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  EPA Seeks Comments on 8 TMDLs By this notice EPA is seeking comment on the following 8 TMDLs for waters located within the State of Arkansas: Segment-Reach
Waterbody name
Pollutant08020301-010
Cypress Bayou
Fecal coliform and E. coli.08020301-011
Cypress Bayou
Fecal coliform and E. coli.08020301-012
Cypress Bayou
Fecal coliform and E. coli.11110103-029
Clear Creek
Fecal coliform and E. coli.
 EPA requests that the public provide EPA with any water quality related data and information that may be relevant to the calculations for these 8 TMDLs. EPA will review all data and information submitted during the public comment period and revise the TMDLs where appropriate. EPA will then forward the TMDLs to the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ). The ADEQ will incorporate the TMDLs into its current water quality management plan. Dated: July 28, 2009. Bill Luthans, Acting Director, Water Quality Protection Division, Region 6.


[FR Doc. E9-19319 Filed 8-11-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
§ 53.7701-1 Tax return preparer. ( a ) *In general.* For the definition of a tax return preparer, see § 301.7701-15 of this chapter.
( b ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section is applicable to returns and claims for refund filed, and advice provided, after December 31, 2008.
[T.D. 9436, 73 FR 78458, Dec. 22, 2008]
www.gpo.gov

### §290k–3. Opposition to certain guarantees or investment promotions; independent evaluation of guaranteed investments

Consistent with the purposes of section 290k–2 of this title, the Secretary of the Treasury shall—

(1) instruct the United States Director to oppose, and to actively seek the concurrence of other members of the Board of Directors in opposing, any guarantee or other investment promotion under consideration by the Agency if the proposed investment would—

(A) be in any country which is not a beneficiary developing country for purposes of title V of the Trade Act of 1974 [19 U.S.C. 2461 et seq.] because it has not taken or is not taking steps to afford internationally-recognized workers’ rights to workers in that country;

(B) be subject to trade-distorting performance requirements imposed by the host country that are likely to result in a significant net reduction in—

(i) employment in the United States; or

(ii) other trade benefits likely to accrue to the United States from the investment; or

(C) likely increase a country's productive capacity in an industry already facing excess worldwide capacity for the same, similar or competing product, and cause substantial injury to producers of such products in the United States; and

(2) within 12 months after the United States becomes a member of the Agency and each year thereafter for the 3 succeeding years, conduct an independent evaluation of the United States investments which have been guaranteed by the Agency to determine—

(A) the anticipated net impact of such investments on employment in and exports from the United States, and

(B) the extent to which such investments were made in countries which had not taken or are not taking steps to afford internationally-recognized workers’ rights to workers in those countries.

In the course of conducting each evaluation required under paragraph (2), the Secretary shall actively solicit and take into account the views of United States labor organizations. The Secretary shall furnish a copy of each such evaluation on its completion to the Congress.

(Pub. L. 100–202, §101(e) [title I], Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1329–131, 1329–134.)

#### References in Text

The Trade Act of 1974, referred to in par. (1)(A), is Pub. L. 93–618, Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 1978, as amended. Title V of the Trade Act of 1974 is classified generally to subchapter V (§2461 et seq.) of chapter 12 of Title 19, Customs Duties. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 2101 of Title 19 and Tables.

#### Codification

Section is based on section 406 of title IV of H.R. 3750, One Hundredth Congress, as introduced Dec. 11, 1987, and enacted into law by Pub. L. 100–202.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5                        
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1997             
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         510,379
<SECURITIES>                                   7,075,778
<RECEIVABLES>                                  27,618
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    380,118
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               8,868,992
<PP&E>                                         815,686
<DEPRECIATION>                                 295,468
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 9,911,709
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          764,309
<BONDS>                                        2,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       286,614
<OTHER-SE>                                     6,860,786
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   9,911,709
<SALES>                                        58,693
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               58,693
<CGS>                                          25,313
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,857,948
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (95,547)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             74,338
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,778,046)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,778,046)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,778,046)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 31.3402(d)-1 Failure to withhold.

If the employer in violation of the provisions of section 3402 fails to deduct and withhold the tax, and thereafter the income tax against which the tax under section 3402 may be credited is paid, the tax under section 3402 shall not be collected from the employer. Such payment does not, however, operate to relieve the employer from liability for penalties or additions to the tax applicable in respect of such failure to deduct and withhold. The employer will not be relieved of his liability for payment of the tax required to be withheld unless he can show that the tax against which the tax under section 3402 may be credited has been paid. See § 31.3403-1, relating to liability for tax.