alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
www.gpo.gov

### §590a. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation; credit of funds

The funds on deposit in the United States Treasury to the credit of the Lemhi Tribe, represented by the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of Indians of the Fort Hall Reservation, Idaho, appropriated by the Act of May 25, 1971 (Public Law 92–18), to pay a judgment of $4,500,000 entered by the Indian Claims Commission in docket numbered 326–I, and interest thereon less attorneys’ fees and expenses shall be credited to the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation for the claims of said tribes enumerated in docket numbered 326–I.

(Pub. L. 92–442, §1, Sept. 29, 1972, 86 Stat. 743.)

#### References in Text

Act of May 25, 1971, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 92–18, May 25, 1971, 85 Stat. 40, known as the Second Supplemental Appropriation Act, 1971, which was not classified to the Code.

The Indian Claims Commission, referred to in text, terminated Sept. 30, 1978. See Codification note set out under former section 70 et seq. of this title.

#### Section Referred to in Other Sections

This section is referred to in sections 590b, 590c of this title.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Victor Jorge, Appellant.

[805 NYS2d 46]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Thomas Farber, J.), rendered February 11, 2004, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of two counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and two counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 4x/2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant claims that the court should have made a more thorough inquiry of a juror who closed his eyes at points during the summation by codefendant’s counsel and the court’s charge and who was being elbowed by a juror in the next seat. This claim is waived and unpreserved. Defendant’s counsel sought no such inquiry, took the position that the juror was not sleeping, and agreed that the juror should not be discharged *(see People v Farmer,*295 AD2d 290 [2002], *lv denied*98 NY2d 768 [2002]). We reject defendant’s arguments on the preservation issue, and we decline to reach defendant’s claim in the interest of justice. Were we to reach this claim, we would find that the record amply supports the conclusion that the juror was not sleeping. The juror denied that he had been sleeping on the one occasion the court addressed him on the subject; with respect to this and the other occasions on which his eyes were closed, the court, the prosecutor, the codefendant’s counsel and defendant’s counsel all agreed that the juror had not been sleeping. Accordingly, there is no basis to conclude that the court was required to make further inquiry *(see e.g. People v Sanabria,*266 AD2d 41 [1999], *lv denied*94 NY2d 884 [2000]; *People v Cruz,*225 AD2d 325 [1996], *lv denied*88 NY2d 965 [1996]; *People v*
      *255
      *Ferguson,*165 AD2d 789 [1990], *lv denied*77 NY2d 838 [1991]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Nardelli, Williams, Gonzalez and McGuire, JJ.
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1163

AN ACT

To authorize the exchange of National Park Service

Patchogue, Suffolk County, New York.State of New York for land in the Village ofland in the Fire Island National Seashore in the
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1163

AN ACT

To authorize the exchange of National Park Service land

in the Fire Island National Seashore in the State of

New York for land in the Village of Patchogue, Suffolk

County, New York.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF EXCHANGE.

4 The Secretary of the Interior may exchange all right,

5 title, and interest of the United States in and to certain

6 National Park Service lands in the Fire Island National
2

•HR 1163 EH

1 Seashore in the State of New York, described in section

2 2, for all right, title, and interest of the Village of

3 Patchogue, Suffolk County, New York, in and to certain

4 lands in the Village of Patchogue, described in section 2,

5 without further consideration.

6 SEC. 2. DESCRIPTION OF LANDS TO BE EXCHANGED.

7 (a) NATIONAL PARK LANDS.—The National Park

8 Service lands in the Fire Island National Seashore, in the

9 State of New York, referred to in section 1 are the lands

10 generally depicted on the map entitled ‘‘Fire Island Na11 tional Seashore Land Exchange—Proposed’’, dated Octo12 ber 1994.

13 (b) VILLAGE OF PATCHOGUE LANDS.—The lands in

14 the Village of Patchogue, Suffolk County, New York, re15 ferred to in section 1 are the lands generally depicted on

16 the map entitled ‘‘Village of Patchogue Land Exchange—

17 Proposed’’, dated October 1994.

18 (c) MAPS.—The maps referred to in subsections (a)

19 and (b) shall be on file and available for inspection in the

20 Office of the Director of the National Park Service.

21 SEC. 3. LANDS ACQUIRED BY SECRETARY.

22 The lands in the Village of Patchogue that are ac23 quired by the Secretary of the Interior under section 1
3

•HR 1163 EH

1 shall be added to and administered as part of the Fire

2 Island National Seashore.

Passed the House of Representatives November 7,

1995.

Attest:

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet and statement of income and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<CIK>0000857264
<NAME>KRUPP GOVERNMENT INCOME TRUST
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          Sep-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               Sep-30-1998
<CASH>                                      10,217,678
<SECURITIES>                               160,322,640<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,047,078
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,155,030<F2>
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             176,742,426
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,713,316<F3>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   169,536,534
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,492,576<F4>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               176,742,426
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,948,412<F5>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,209,700<F6>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             14,738,712
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         14,738,712
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                14,738,712
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Includes Participating Insured Mortgage Investments ("PIMIs") (insured
mortgages of $75,488,620 and Additional Loans of $13,358,208), Participating 
Insured Mortgages ("PIMs") of $47,834,126 and Mortgage-backed Securities ("MBS")
of $23,641,686.,
<F2>Includes prepaid acquisition fees and expenses of $12,266,450 net of 
accoumulated amortization of $8,604,734 and prepaid participation servicing fees
of $4,088,713 net of accumulated amortization of $2,595,399.
<F3>Includes deferred income on Additional Loans of $5,688,346.
<F4>Unrealized gain on MBS.
<F5>Represents interest income on investments in mortgages and cash.
<F6>Includes $2,702,839 of amortization of prepaid fees and expenses.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
www.gpo.gov

### §1122. Payment and distribution of judgment funds

The funds appropriated by the Acts of July 22, 1969 (83 Stat. 49), and January 8, 1971 (84 Stat. 1981), to pay judgments awarded to the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma and the Miami Indians of Indiana in Indian Claims Commission dockets numbered 255 and 124–C, dockets numbered 256, 124–D, E, and F, and dockets numbered 131 and 253, and to pay a judgment awarded to the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma in docket numbered 251–A, together with interest thereon, after payment of attorney fees and litigation expenses, shall be distributed as provided in sections 1122 to 1130 of this title.

(Pub. L. 92–309, §1, June 2, 1972, 86 Stat. 199.)

#### References in Text

Acts of July 22, 1969, and January 8, 1971, referred to in text, are Pub. L. 91–47, July 22, 1969, 83 Stat. 49, and Pub. L. 91–665, Jan. 8, 1971, 84 Stat. 1981, respectively, which were not classified to the Code.

The Indian Claims Commission, referred to in text, terminated Sept. 30, 1978. See Codification note set out under former section 70 et seq. of this title.

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of Pub. L. 89–659, Oct. 14, 1966, 80 Stat. 909, which comprises this subchapter.

#### Section Referred to in Other Sections

This section is referred to in sections 1123, 1129, 1130 of this title.
§ 16.16 Disqualification of reviewing official or ALJ. ( a ) A reviewing official or ALJ in a particular case may disqualify himself or herself at any time.
( b ) A party may file with the ALJ a motion for disqualification of a reviewing official or an ALJ. Such motion shall be accompanied by an affidavit alleging personal bias or other reason for disqualification.
( c ) Such motion and affidavit shall be filed promptly upon the party's discovery of reasons requiring disqualification, or such objections shall be deemed waived.
( d ) Such affidavit shall state specific facts that support the party's assertion that personal bias or other reason for disqualification exists and the time and circumstances of the party's discovery of such facts. It shall be accompanied by a certificate of the representative of record that it is made in good faith.
( e ) Upon the filing of such a motion and affidavit, the ALJ shall proceed no further in the case until he or she resolves the matter of disqualification in accordance with paragrpah (f) of this section.
( f ) ( 1 ) If the ALJ determines that a reviewing official is disqualified, the ALJ shall dismiss the complaint without prejudice.
( 2 ) If the ALJ disqualifies himself or herself, the agency shall seek to have the case promptly reassigned to another ALJ.
( 3 ) If the ALJ denies a motion to disqualify, the authority head may determine the matter only as part of his or her review of the initial decision upon appeal, if any.
§ 1.641(a)-0 Scope of subchapter J. ( a ) *In general.* Subchapter J (sections 641 and following), chapter 1 of the Code, deals with the taxation of income of estates and trusts and their beneficiaries, and of income in respect of decedents. Part I of subchapter J contains general rules for taxation of estates and trusts (subpart A), specific rules relating to trusts which distribute current income only (subpart B), estates and trusts which may accumulate income or which distribute corpus (subpart C), treatment of excess distributions by trusts (subpart D), grantors and other persons treated as substantial owners (subpart E), and miscellaneous provisions relating to limitations on charitable deductions, income of an estate or trust in case of divorce, and taxable years to which the provisions of subchapter J are applicable (subpart F). Part I has no application to any organization which is not to be classified for tax purposes as a trust under the classification rules of §§ 301.7701-2, 301.7701-3, and 301.7701-4 of this chapter (Regulations on Procedure and Administration). Part II of subchapter J relates to the treatment of income in respect of decedents. However, the provisions of subchapter J do not apply to employee trusts subject to subchapters D and F, chapter 1 of the Code, and common trust funds subject to subchapter H, chapter 1 of the Code.
( b ) *Scope of subparts A, B, C, and D.* Subparts A, B, C, and D (section 641 and following), part I, subchapter J, chapter 1 of the Code, relate to the taxation of estates and trusts and their beneficiaries. These subparts have no application to any portion of the corpus or income of a trust which is to be regarded, within the meaning of the Code, as that of the grantor or others treated as its substantial owners. See subpart E (section 671 and following), Part I, subchapter J, chapter 1 of the Code, and the regulations thereunder for rules for the treatment of any portion of a trust where the grantor (or another person) is treated as the substantial owner. So-called alimony trusts are treated under subparts A, B, C, and D, except to the extent otherwise provided in section 71 or section 682. These subparts have no application to beneficiaries of nonexempt employees' trusts. See section 402(b) and the regulations thereunder.
( c ) *Multiple trusts.* Multiple trusts that have: ( 1 ) No substantially independent purposes (such as independent dispositive purposes),
( 2 ) The same grantor and substantially the same beneficiary, and
( 3 ) The avoidance or mitigation of (*i*) the progressive rates of tax (including mitigation as a result of deferral of tax) or (*ii*) the minimum tax for tax preferences imposed by section 56 as their principal purpose,
shall be consolidated and treated as one trust for the purposes of subchapter J. [T.D. 6500, 25 FR 11814, Nov. 26, 1960, as amended by T.D. 6989, 34 FR 731, Jan. 17, 1969; T.D. 7204, 37 FR 17158, Aug. 25, 1972]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

SHEILA SUMMERS,

 Respondent Below-

 Appellant,

v.

CHARLES GARRISON,

 Petitioner Below-

 Appellee.

§

§ No. 373, 2017

§

§

§ Court Below—Family Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ File No. CN15-06533

§ Pet Nos. 17-12801 and

§ 17-15979

§

Submitted: November 20, 2017

 Decided: November 30, 2017

O R D E R

This 30th day of November 2017, it appears to the Court that, on October 31, 

2017, the Chief Deputy Clerk issued a notice to the appellant to show cause why her

appeal should not be dismissed for her failure to pay the Family Court appeal fee 

and for failure to file a completed motion to proceed in forma pauperis as directed 

by the Court. The appellant failed to respond to the notice to show cause within the 

required ten-day period. Dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, under Supreme Court 

Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the within appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr.

Justice
H. Con. Res. 192 Agreed to June 27, 1996

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

Concurrent Resolution

Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legislative days of

Thursday, June 27, 1996, or Friday, June 28, 1996, pursuant to

a motion made by the Majority Leader or his designee, it stand

adjourned until noon on Monday, July 8, 1996, or until noon on

the second day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant

to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first;

and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of

business on Thursday, June 27, 1996, Friday, June 28, 1996, Saturday, June 29, 1996, or Sunday, June 30, 1996, pursuant to a

motion made by the Majority Leader or his designee in accordance

with this resolution, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon

on Monday, July 8, 1996, or until such time on that day as may

be specified by the Majority Leader or his designee in the motion

to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second day after Members

are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent

resolution, whichever occurs first.

SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader

of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority

Leader of the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall

notify the Members of the House and Senate, respectively, to
H. Con. Res. 192—2

reassemble whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall

warrant it.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
#### CHARLES B. MASON, EXECUTOR OF THOMAS MASON, DECEASED, v. THE UNITED STATES.

[46 C. Cls. R., 393; 47 C. Cls. R., 31; 227 U. S. R., 486.]

*On the defendant's appeal.*

This case, decided adversely to the claimant (46 C. CIs. B., 393), is again brought before the court by a motion for a new trial on precisely the same facts, and is reconsidered on the single question of the true interpretation to be given to the act 16th April, 1908 (S. 5). In the former decision it was held that the advance of rank and pay given by the act i6th April, 1908, is limited by the words *“when retired.”*Also that the advancement of a retired officer under, an exceptional act, the act 25th February, 1905, will not increase his pay under the later act of 1908. Also that the advance in rank and pay intended by this act must be reckoned at the time of the retirement and can not be reckoned upon the rank acquired by virtue of a statute passed for his benefit after his retirement.

*507The court below decides:

I. The *act 16 April, 1908*(35 Stat. L., p. 61), provides that certain, officers of the Revenue-Cutter Service “ *shall when retired have the ranlc and receive three-fourths of the duty pay and inorease of the newt higher grade; and the provisions of this section shall apply to officers of the said service now on the retired list.”*The words “ *shall when retired have the ranlc and receive three-fourths of the duty pay and increase of the newt higher grade*” being unambiguous, must be held to relate to retirements subsequent to the passage of the act.

II. The concluding words of the fifth section, “ *the provisions of this1 section shall apply to officers of the said service now on the retired list,”*recognized the status, rank, and grade of the officers as they existed at the time of the passage of the act. They therefore can not be applied to. the time when the officers retired from active service.

The decision of the court below is reversed on the ground that section 5 of the act of April 16, 1908, 85 Stat. L., 61, c. 345, providing for rank and pay of retired officers of the Revenue-Cutter Service, did not give in this case an additional step forward in pay to a retired officer who had already been advanced one step in grade gratuitously.

February 24, 1913.

Mr. Justice Lur'ton

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court
Order issued December 2, 2013

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

________________________________________ 

No. 05-13-00256-CR 

________________________________________ 

RICHARD GONZALES, JR., Appellant 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 

O R D E R 

Before Justices Francis, Lang-Miers, and Lewis 

 Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we GRANT the July 22, 2013 motion of 

Christopher A. Routt for leave to withdraw as appointed counsel on appeal. We DIRECT the 

Clerk of the Court to remove Christopher A. Routt as counsel of record for appellant. We 

DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order and all future correspondence to 

Richard Gonzales, Jr., TDCJ #1835502, Hutchins State Jail, 1500 East Langdon Road, Dallas, 

Texas, 75241. 

/Molly Francis/ 

MOLLY FRANCIS 

JUSTICE
# LI2020047EN.01000501.xml

| 20.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | LI 47/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

LI 47/5

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU, Euratom) 2020/233

of 17 February 2020

appointing a member, proposed by the French Republic, of the European Economic and Social Committee

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 302 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the French Government,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 18 September 2015 and 1 October 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU, Euratom) 2015/1600 (1) and (EU, Euratom) 2015/1790 (2) appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2015 to 20 September 2020. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 18 September 2015 and 1 October 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU, Euratom) 2015/1600 (1) and (EU, Euratom) 2015/1790 (2) appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2015 to 20 September 2020.

| (2) | A member’s seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Christophe HILLAIRET, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member’s seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Christophe HILLAIRET,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Maximin CHARPENTIER, Membre du bureau de l’Assemblée permanente des chambres d’agriculture, is hereby appointed as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 20 September 2020.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 17 February 2020.

For the Council

The President

J. BORRELL FONTELLES

---

(1)  Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2015/1600 of 18 September 2015 appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2015 to 20 September 2020 (OJ L 248, 24.9.2015, p. 53).

1

(2)  Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2015/1790 of 1 October 2015 appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2015 to 20 September 2020 (OJ L 260, 7.10.2015, p. 23).

2

---
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2014-0132

Directorate Identifier: 2012NM007AD

A330-32-3173, R04 --- 6/12/06

A330-32-3173, R03 --- 3/13/06

A330-32-3173, R02 --- 5/11/05

A330-32-3173, R01 --- 6/16/04

A330-32-3173 --- 12/17/03

A330-32-3180, R04 --- 7/30/13

A330-32-3180, R03 --- 1/28/11

A330-32-3180, R02 --- 4/4/2007

A330-32-3180, R01 --- 8/15/05

A340-32-4212, R04 --- 6/12/06

A340-32-4212, R03 --- 3/13/06

A340-32-4212, R02 --- 5/11/05

A340-32-4212, R01 --- 6/16/04

A340-32-4212 --- 12/17/03

A340-32-4222, --- 9/20/04

A340-32-4222, R01 --- 8/15/05

A340-32-4222, R02 --- 4/4/07

A340-32-4222, R03 --- 1/28/11

MESS-DOWTY A33/34-32-222, R5 --- 5/1/07

MESS-DOWTY A33/34-32-222 --- 12/6/03

MESS-DOWTY A33/34-32-223, R1 --- 9/27/05

MESS-DOWTY A33/34-32-227, R2 --- 12/9/10
Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008