Order: 20 10

- 5

- 22 Served: May 19 , 20 1 0



### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation on the 19 th day of May , 20 10

DOT

- OST

- 2003

- 14528 DOT

- OST

- 2004

- 17617 DOT

- OST

- 2003

- 15553

DOT

- OST

- 2003

- 14950 DOT

- OST

- 1997

- 2523

ORDER REQUESTING PROPOSALS

Summary By this order

, the Department is requesting proposals from carriers interested in providing essential air service (EAS) at Bradford

, DuBois, and Oil City/Franklin, Pennsylvania, and Jamestown, New York , for the next two

- year period from October 1, 2010, t hrough September 30 , 2012 , with or without subsidy . Proposals are due June 22

, 20 1 0. ( See Appendix A for an area map.)

Background By two Orders 1

1 Order 2008

- 5

- 3, May 6, 2008, for DuBois, Oil City/Franklin, and Greenbrier/White Sulphur Springs, and Order 2008

- 6

- 37, June 25, 2008, for Bradford and Jamestown. , the Department selected Gulfstream International Airlines, Inc. (Gulfstream) to provide subsidized EAS at the above

- captioned communities. Order 2008

- 6

- 37, June 25, 2008, selected Gulfstream to provide EAS at Bradford and Jamestown for the two

- year period from October 1, 2008, through September 30, 2010. Order 2008

- 5

- 3, May 6, 2008 , selected Gulfstream to pr ovide EAS at DuBois, Oil City/Franklin, and Greenbrier/White Sulphur Springs, for a two

- year period beginning when the carrier inaugurated service through the end of the 24 th Essential Air Service at

BRADFORD, PENNSYLVANIA DuBOIS, PENNSYLVANIA GREENBRIER/W HITE SULPHUR SPRINGS, WEST VIRGINIA JAMESTOWN, NEW YORK OIL CITY/FRANKLIN, PENNSYLVANIA

under 49 U.S.C. 41731 et seq.- 2

-

month thereafter. Gulfstream inaugurated service at those three communities on S eptember 3, 2008, thus setting an expiration date of September 30, 2010, the same as Bradford and Jamestown’s. Service to all five communities consist s of service to Cleveland Hopkins International Airport as Continental Connection, using 19

- passenger Bee chcraft 1900 aircraft

. The service provided and subsidy amounts are summarized in the chart below.

Number of weekly Community round trips Annual subsidy & notes Bradford 18 $2,701,605 (includes Jamestown) DuBois 24 $2,020,095 Oil City/Franklin 12 $1,226,773 Jamestown 18 $2,701,605 (includes Bradford) Greenbrier/W. Sulphur 13 $2,330,725 Springs

W e are not soliciting proposals for Greenbrier/White Sulphur Springs, West Vir ginia (Greenbrier). In Order 2008

- 5

- 3, May 6, 2008, Greenbrier was included under the same contract as DuBois and Oil City/Franklin. However, on June 10, 2010, Atlantic Southeast Airlines (ASA) and Pinnacle Airlines, both operating as Delta Connection

, will inaugurate subsidy

- free service from Greenbrier Valley Airport to both Atlanta

- Hartsfield Jackson International Airport and New York LaGuardia Airport with 50

- seat Canadair CRJ

- 200 aircraft. Delta Connection will provide one daily nonstop round trip in the Greenbrier

- Atlanta market and one daily nonstop round trip in the Greenbrier

- New York LaGuardia market. That level of service fully meets Greenbrier ’s EAS requirements, so, consistent with longstanding program practice, we will simply rely on Delta Connection’s subsidy

- free service and not request proposals. We will continue to compensate Gulfstream for its service at Greenbrier through the end of the current contract period

– September 30, 2010. Despite not receiving an EAS subsidy, Greenbrier wil l remain a designated

- EAS community , and, should Delta Connection subsequently decide to terminate service in either market, it would first have to file a 90

- day notice of its intent to suspend service.

Special discussion concerning Bradford and Oil City/ Franklin Based on the most recent 12

- month period for which data are available (April 1, 2009

, through March 31, 2010), 5,157 passengers were enplaned and deplaned at Bradford, while 2,785 passengers were enplaned and deplaned at Oil City/Franklin. The an nual subsidy amount for Bradford is $1,350,803 and Oil City/Franklin’s is $1,226,773. Therefore, the subsidy per passenger at Bradford is $262 and $440 at Oil City/Franklin. The Department is prohibited from subsidizing air service at a community where t he subsidy per passenger exceeds $200, unless the community is more than 210 highway miles from the nearest large or medium hub airport 2

. Bradford and Oil City/Franklin exceed the $200 per passenger cap and both are fewer than 210 miles from a large or medium hub. Bradford is 84 miles from Buffalo Niagara International Airport (BUF) and Oil City/Franklin is 100 miles from Pittsburgh International Airport (PIT).

In Order 2 008

- 5

- 3, we expressed our concern that the subsidy level for Oil City/Franklin was high when viewed in the context of passenger usage. The Department encouraged the

2 Congress first established the $200 ceiling under P.L. 101

- 164 for fiscal year 1990, and reestablished it in fiscal years 1994

- 1999. The ceiling was made permanent by P.L. 106

- 69, the Departmen t of Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriations Act of 2000.- 3

-

community and Gulfstream to work together to maximize use of the service to avoid exceedi ng the $200 per passenger cap. Rather than termina te service eligibility at either communit y , at this stage, the Department will solicit proposals for EAS at both, but the Department will evaluate all proposals submitted before committing to a two

- year contract or making a final determination on Bradford and Oil City/Franklin’s continuing eligibility. During the 30

- day window for proposals, we expect both communities to work aggressively with all potential applicants to mitigate some of the risks that the carriers may face in an attempt to lower their sub sidy levels.

Request for Proposals As the end of the current rate term s approac h , we are here requesting proposals from carriers interested in providing service at Bradford, DuBois, Jamestown, and /or Oil City/Franklin , with or without subsidy, to be file d no later than June 22 , 20 1 0

. A fter that date, our staff will docket the proposals, thereby making them public, and direct each carrier to serve a copy of its proposal on the civic parties and other applicants. Shortly afterwards, we will provide a summa ry of the proposals to the communit ies and ask them to submit their final comments. We will give full consideration to all proposals that are timely filed. 3

Interested carriers should prepare their proposals with every expectation that their initial pr oposals will represent their final and only proposals. However, we retain the discretion to negotiate proposals with carriers when we deem it desirable. We also retain the discretion to reject outright all unreasonable or unrealistic proposals and sol ici t a new round of proposals.

We are here providing interested carriers with some basic information to serve as guidance when they prepare their proposals, but we will not prescribe a precise format for their proposals. We expect proposals to adequately describe the service being proposed and the annual amount of subsidy being requested. The applicants can make their own judgments as to the level of detail they wish to present; however, they might want to include proposed schedules as well as supporting d ata for their subsidy requests, such as projected block hours, revenues and expenses. We strongly encourage clear, well

- documented proposals that will facilitate their evaluation by the affected communities and the Department. 4

With respect to DuBois, w e ask that carriers submit proposals for t wo round trips per day (12 total round trips per week) with 3 0

- seat or larger aircraf t or three round trips per day ( 18 total round trips per week) with 15

- seat or larger aircraft to Cleveland, Detroit, Washington, D.C. or another suitable hub where numerous connections to the national air transportation system can be made. Service may be non

- stop or one

- stop, rout ed through a nearby community. The

3 Carriers should not expect the Department to accept late filings. In cases where a carrier proposes to provide essential air service without subsidy and we determine that service can b e reliably provided without such compensation, we do not proceed with the carrier

- selection case. Instead, we simply rely on that carrier’s subsidy

free service as proposed. 4 In selecting a carrier to provide subsidized essential air service, 49 U.S.C. 4 1733(c) (1) directs us to consider four factors : (1) service reliability; (2) contractual and marketing arrangements with a larger carrier at the hub; (3) interline arrangements with a larger carrier at the hub; and (4) community views

. In addition , the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008, Public Law 110

- 161

, provides that when selecting a carrier to provide EAS, the Department may consider the relative subsidy requirements, thus codifying a factor that we have considered since the inception of the prog ram. Interested carriers should also be aware that our general provisions governing essential air service will be included in the selection order as part of our authorization of subsidy for the selected service. Appendix C of this order contains those ge neral provisions.- 4

-

Depar tment may consider subsidizing four round trips per day if two or more o f the proposed round trips are linked with another community.

For Oil City/Franklin, we are requesting two round trips per day (12 total per week) of either nonstop or one stop service to a suitable hub airport. While Oi l City/Franklin is en titled to service with 1 5

- seat or larger aircraft, the extremely low traffic levels may be better suited to service with smaller aircraft s eating fewer than 15 passengers . If a proposal is submitted for service offering fewer than 15

- seats , we will consid er subsidizing one additional daily round trip (for a total of 18 per week).

With respect to Bradford and Jamestown, we ask that carriers submit proposals for two nonstop round trips per day (12 total round trips per week) wi th 15

- seat or larger aircraft. An additional frequency may be subsidized (for a total of 18 per week) if it is linked with another community, as Bradford and Jamestown’s service has been historically.

As stated above, we will evaluate all proposals submitted before committing to a tw o

- year contract or making a final determination on Bradford and Oil City/Franklin’s continuing eligibility.

We would also entertain proposals for eight

- or nine

- seat aircraft with an additional frequency for any or all of the four communities. In that ev ent, a nd the community ultimately supports the service, in effect waiving their right to 15

- seat or larger aircraft, we would consider the waiver to apply only to the two

- year carrier

- selection at hand, i.e. we would not assume that the community waives their rights for all time. A s always, we will formally solicit the communit ies’ views on any service options we receive before making a long

- te rm carrier selection decision.

The c ommunities and air carrier s are encouraged to work together in advance of the due date for proposals to craft a service pattern that is desirable to the community and meets the operational needs of the airline inter ested in submitting a proposal. In addition, carriers should be ve ry clear as to whether a specific community’s proposal is on a stand

- alone basis, or whether it is part of a larger, inseparable package with other communities.

We encourage proposals that meet these requirements in an efficient manner. Carriers are also welcome to propose more than one service option, if they choose; they need not limit themselves to those requirements if they envision other, potentially more attractive service possibilities

-- different hubs, for example

-- with subsidy requirements tha t remain competitive.

New Filing Procedures Carrier proposals s hould be s ubmitted to the Department with all materials merged into a single document. The document will be published on Regulations.gov and each page should be formatted to be viewed online. Service and Traffic History

For the year ending March 31, 20 10

, th e most recent period for which traffic data are available, Bradford averaged 8.2 enplanements a day , DuBois 16.3

, Jamestown 11.4 , and Oil City/Franklin 4.4

. 5

5 See Appendix B for historical traffic data. Enplanements represent one

- half of total origin

- and

- destination traffic, and average enplanements per day are based on 77 weekdays and weekends each quarter , except as noted. In order to assist carriers in making their traffic and revenue forecasts, we have included historical traffic data in Appendix B.- 5

-

Other Carrier Requirements The Department is responsible for implementing various Federal statutes governing lobbying activities, drug

- free workplaces, and nondiscrimination. 6 Consequently, all carriers receiving Federal subsidy for essential air service must certify that they are in compliance with Department regulations regarding drug

- free workplaces and nondiscrimination, and those carriers whose subsidies exceed $100,000 over the life of the rate term must also certify that they are in compliance with the regulations governing lobbying activities . Because the Department is prohibited from paying subsidy to carriers that do not submit these documents, all carriers that plan to submit proposals involving subsidy should be aware that the selected carrier will be required to complete the required cer tifications. Interested carriers requiring more detailed information regarding these requirements should contact the Office of Aviation Analysis at (202) 366

- 5903. 7

Community and State Comments The communit ies and state s are welcome to submit comments on the proposals at any time. As noted earlier, however, we will provide a summary of the proposals to the civic parties and ask them to submit their final comments shortly after June 22

, the due date for proposals.

This order is issued under authority delegated in 49 CFR 1.56a(f) and re

- delegated to the Director, Office of Aviation Analysis.

ACCORDINGLY, 1. We request that carriers interested in providing essential air service at Bradford

, DuBois, and Oil City/Franklin, Pen nsylvania, and Jamestown, New York

, for the two

- year period from October 1, 2010, through September 30 , 2012

, submit their proposals, with or without requests for subsidy, no later than June 22 , 20 1 0

. The proposals should be e

- mailed to EAS@dot.gov

, with the title: “Proposal to Provide Essential Air Service at Bradford (Docket DOT

- OST

- 2003

- 14528) DuBois (DOT

- OST

- 2004

- 17617), Oil City/Franklin (DOT

- OST

- 1997

- 2523) and/or Jamestown (DOT

- OST

- 2003

- 14950) ; 8

2. Th ese docket s will remain open until furthe r order of the Department; and

3 . We will serve co pies of this order on the Mayor s of Bradford, DuBois, Oil City, Franklin, White Sulphur Springs, and Jamestown, the managers of Bradford Regional Airport, DuBois Regional Airport, Venango Regional Airport (Oil City/Franklin), Greenbrier Valley Airport

, Chautauqua County/Jamestown Airport, and the parties listed in Appendix D

.

6 The regulati ons applicable to these areas are: (1) 49 CFR Part 20

– New restrictions on lobbying; (2) 49 CFR Part 21

– Nondiscrimination in federally

- assisted programs of the Department of Transportation

– Effectuation of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; 49 CFR Part 27

– Nondiscrimination on the basis of disability in programs and activities receiving or benefiting from Federal financial assistance; and 14 CFR Part 382

– Nondiscrimination on the basis of disability in air travel; and (3) 49 CFR Part 29

– Gove rnment

- wide debarment and suspension (non

procurement) and government

- wide requirements for drug

- free workplace (grants).
7 The certifications are also available on the web at http://ostpxweb.dot.gov/aviation/index.html.
8 Questions regarding filings in response to this order may be directed via electronic mail to Kevin Schlemmer at kevin.schlemmer@dot.gov or via phone at (202) 366

- 3176.- 6

-

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of this order under the Department’s Aviation Economic Regulations, 14 CFR 385.50, must file such petitions within ten (10) days after the date of service of this order.

This order will be effective immediately, and the filing of a petition for review shall not preclude its effectiveness.

By:

TODD M. HOMAN Director Office of Aviation Analysis

(SEAL)

An electronic version of this document is available on the Internet at http://www.regulations.govAppendix A



## AREA MAP

This map is provided by Sabre ® AirVision TM Profit Essentials and is being used with express permission of the copyright holder, Sabre Airline Solutions®.Appendix B Page 1 of 4

Traffic History *

Oil City/Franklin , Pennsylvania ( FKL )

Year Quarter Carrier Deplaned Enplaned Totals
2006 2 Air Midwest Inc. 498 505 1,003
2006 3 Air Midwest Inc. 520 555 1,075
2006 4 Air Midwest Inc. 429 458 887
2007 1 Air Midwest Inc. 351 384 735 3,700

2007 2 Air Midwest Inc. 393 390 783
2007 3 Air Midwest Inc. 399 396 795
2007 4 Air Midwest Inc. 340 321 661
2008 1 Air Midwest Inc. 174 195 369 2,608

2008 2 Air Midwest Inc. 106 92 198
2008 3 Gulfstream Int 289 87 376
2008 4 Gulfstream Int 1,156 299 1,455
2009 1 Gulfstream Int 1,047 322 1,369 3,398

2009 2 Gulfstream Int 351 376 727
2009 3 Gulfstream Int 362 362 724
2009 4 Gulfstream Int 387 376 763
2010 1 Gulfstream Int 287 284 571 2,785

Average daily enplanements at Oil City/Franklin ( 12

- months ending 3/31/2010 )

– 4.4 **

* Source

– T

- 100 Market Report, Passengers in Scheduled Passenger Service, includes traffic for Air Midwest, Inc. and Gulfstream International Airlines only.

**Average daily enplanements = total traffic for the most recent year divided by 313 service days divided by 2

.Appendix B Page 2 of 4

Traffic History*

DuBois, Pennsylvania (DUJ)

Year Quarter Carrier Deplaned Enplaned Totals
2006 2 Air Midwest Inc. 2,087 2,116 4,203
2006 3 Air Midwest Inc. 2,249 2,267 4,516
2006 4 Air Midwest Inc. 2,033 2,143 4,176
2007 1 Air Midwest Inc. 1,745 1,869 3,614 16,509

2007 2 Air Midwest Inc. 1,813 1,897 3,710
2007 3 Air Midwest Inc. 1,659 1,839 3,498
2007 4 Air Midwest Inc. 1,486 1,563 3,049
2008 1 Air Midwest Inc. 960 1,122 2,082 12,339

2008 2 Air Midwest Inc. 509 538 1,047
2008 3 Gulfstream Int 205 309 514
2008 4 Gulfstream Int 907 1,248 2,155
2009 1 Gulfstream Int 810 1,161 1,971 5,687

2009 2 Gulfstream Int 1,309 1,316 2,625
2009 3 Gulfstream Int 1,342 1,373 2,715
2009 4 Gulfstream Int 1,301 1,238 2,539
2010 1 Gulfstream Int 1,128 1,221 2,349 10,228

Average daily enplanements at DuBois (12

- months ending 3/31/2010)

– 16.3**

*Source

– T

- 100 Market Report, Passengers in Scheduled Passenger Service, includes traffic for Air Midwest, Inc. and Gulfstream International Airlines only.

**Average daily enplan ements = total traffic for the most recent year divided by 313 service days divided by 2

.Appendix B Page 3 of 4

Traffic History*

Jamestown, New York (JHW)

Year Quarter Uniquecarriername Deplaned Enplaned Totals
2006 2 Colgan Air 1,344 1,022 2,366
2006 3 Colgan Air 1,355 1,278 2,633
2006 4 Colgan Air 1,058 1,014 2,072
2007 1 Colgan Air 873 862 1,735 8,806

2007 2 Colgan Air 1,240 1,104 2,344
2007 3 Colgan Air 1,251 1,263 2,514
2007 4 Colgan Air 845 785 1,630
2008 1 Colgan Air 817 1,038 1,855 8,343

2008 2 Colgan Air 621 1,254 1,875
2008 3 Colgan Air 661 1,329 1,990
2008 4 Gulfstream Int 1,421 786 2,207
2009 1 Gulfstream Int 1,136 692 1,828 7,900

2009 2 Gulfstream Int 876 827 1,703
2009 3 Gulfstream Int 1,109 1,138 2,247
2009 4 Gulfstream Int 865 875 1,740
2010 1 Gulfstream Int 663 760 1,423 7,113

Average daily enplanements at Jamestown (12

- months ending 3/31/2010)

– 11.4**

*Source

– T

- 100 Market Report, Passengers in Scheduled Passenger Service, includes traffic for Air Midwest, Inc. and Gulfstream International Airlines only.

**Average daily enplanements = total traffic for the most recent year divided by 313 service days divided by 2

.Appendix B Page 4 of 4

Traffic History*

Bradford, Pennsylvania (BFD)

Year Quarter Carrier Deplaned Enplaned Totals
2006 2 Colgan Air 857 949 1,806
2006 3 Colgan Air 858 949 1,807
2006 4 Colgan Air 822 815 1,637
2007 1 Colgan Air 709 866 1,575 6,825

2007 2 Colgan Air 808 778 1,586
2007 3 Colgan Air 697 711 1,408
2007 4 Colgan Air 586 682 1,268
2008 1 Colgan Air 807 1,050 1,857 6,119

2008 2 Colgan Air 1,023 1,599 2,622
2008 3 Colgan Air 958 1,578 2,536
2008 4 Gulfstream Int 492 589 1,081
2009 1 Gulfstream Int 421 471 892 7,131

2009 2 Gulfstream Int 608 592 1,200
2009 3 Gulfstream Int 787 777 1,564
2009 4 Gulfstream Int 665 693 1,358
2010 1 Gulfstream Int 506 529 1,035 5,157

Average daily enplanements at Bradford (12

- months ending 3/31/2010)

– 8.2**

*Source

– T

- 100 Market Report, Passengers in Scheduled Passenger Service, includes traffic for Air Midwest, Inc. and Gulfstream International Airlines only.

**Average daily enplanements = total traffic for the most recent year divided by 313 service days divided by 2

.Appendix C

Example of General Terms and Conditions for Essential Air Service

The carrier understands that it may forfeit its compensation for any flights that it does not operate in conformance with the terms and stipulations of the rate o rder, including the service plans outlined in the order and any other significant elements of the required service, without prior approval. The carrier understands that an aircraft take

- off and landing at its scheduled destination constitutes a completed flight; absent an explanation supporting subsidy eligibility for a flight that has not been completed, such as certain weather cancellations, only completed flights are considered eligible for subsidy. In addition, if the carrier does not schedule or oper ate its flights in full conformance with the order for a significant period, it may jeopardize its entire subsidy claim for the period in question. If the carrier contemplates any such changes beyond the scope of the order during the applicable period of these rates, it must first notify the Office of Aviation Analysis in writing and receive written approval from the Department to be ensured of full compensation. Should circumstances warrant, the Department may locate and select a replacement carrier to p rovide service on these routes. The carrier must complete all flights that can be safely operated; flights that overfly points for lack of traffic will not be compensated. In determining whether subsidy payment for a deviating flight should be adjusted o r disallowed, the Department will consider the extent to which the goals of the program are met and the extent of access to the national air transportation system provided to the community.

If the Department unilaterally, either partially or completely, terminates or reduces payments for service or changes service requirements at a specific location provided for under this order, then, at the end of the period for which the Department does make payments in the stipulated amounts or at the stipulated servi ce levels, the carrier may cease to provide service to that specific location without regard to any requirement for notice of such cessation. Those adjustments in the levels of subsidy and/or service that are mutually agreed to in writing by the Departmen t and carrier do not constitute a total or partial reduction or cessation of payment.

Subsidy contracts are subject to, and incorporate by reference, relevant statutes and Department regulations, as they may be amended from time to time. However, any suc h statutes, regulations, or amendments thereto shall not operate to controvert the foregoing paragraph.

Funds are not currently available for performance under this solicitation beyond [DATE]

. The Government’s obligation for perform ance under this solici tation beyond [DATE] , is contingent upon the availability of appropriated funds from which payment for services can be made. No legal liability on the part of the Government for any payment may arise for performance under this order beyond [DATE] , until f unds are made available to the Department for performance. If funds are not made available for performance beyond [DATE] , the carrier will receive notice in writing by the Department.

All claims for payment must be submitted within 60 days of the last da y of service provided under this order

.Appendix D
Distribution Air Sunshine, Inc. Intrepid Internatl Air, Rick Eyk Air Sunshine, Mirmohammad Adili Island Air Charters, Linda House Air West, Inc., John Raatz Jet Air, Daniel Wolford Air Wisconsin, Annette Daly Kenmore Air, Tim Brooks Airline Associates, Bill Mishk McCall Aviation and Salmon Air, Dan Scott Alaska Airlines, Jeff Cole McCall Aviation, Michelle Alaska Airlines, Sandy Sinick Mesa, Jonathan Ornstein Allegiant Air, Robert Ashscroft Mesa, Michael Lotz American Airlines, Carl Nelson Mesa, Mike Holcomb American Eagle, Jeffrey Hartz Mesaba, John Spanjers Atlantic Southeast, Jon Lindlief Mesaba, Max Shemesh Atlantis Southeast, Roger Weston Midstar Airlines, Jeffrey Fonner Bemidji Aviation, Cori Rude Midwest Airlines, Greg Aretakis Bemidji Aviation , Arlen Rinkenberger MN Aviation, Jose Maldonado Cape Air, Andrew Bonney Multi Aero, Darnea Cape Air, Dan Wolf Multi Aero, Shane Storz Cape Air, J. Flaherty Northwest, Tim McDonald Classic Aviation, Tony Henderson NYDC, Henok Araya Colgan Air, Mike Colgan OST, Brian Swanson CommutAir, Andy Price OST, Dennis DeVany CommutAir, Joel Raymond OST, Kevin Adams Consultant, Robert Silverberg OST, Kevin Schlemmer Continental, Bruce Keiner OST, Michael Martin Continental, Dan Weiss OST, Renee Williams Continental, Lorry Halloway Pacific Wings, Frank Ford Delta, Amy Martin Pacific Wings, Greg Kahlstorf Delta, Dan Shuman PenAir, Danny Seybert Delta, Jeff Morgan PenAir, Scott Bloomquist Delta, Joe Esposito Pinnacle Airlines, Joe Williams Delta, Karen Zachary Pinnacle Airlines, Phil Reed Delta, Sascha Vanderbellen Public Charters, Jim Gallagher Dorado Jets Scenic, Mary Schneider Dorado Jets, Mark McKenna Scenic, Mitzi Daines Era Aviation, Mike Lenorman Seaborne Airlines, Wayne D'Amico Executive Airlines, Kate Soled SeaPort Airlines, Jim Day Frontier Flying, Bob Hajducovich SeaPort Airlines, Rob McKinney Gem Air, Dan Schroeder Shuttle America, Jerry Balsano Gem Air, JoAnn Wolters SkyWest, Eric Christensen Great Lakes, Chuck Howell SkyWest, Michael Thompson Great Lakes, Doug Voss Sovereign Air, Bob Karns Great Lakes, Greg Stephens Sovereign Air, Lois R. Barton Gulfstream, Dave Hackett Tradewind, Eric Zipkin Gulfstream, Mickey Bowman TransStates, Fred Oxley Gulfstream, T. Cooper TransStates, Gerry Wigmore Homeland Security, Bill Ragan United, Alicia Gabriel Homeland Security, David Bernier United, James Starnes Homeland Security, Randy Webb US Airways, Benjamin Slocum Horizon Air, Dan Russo US Airways, Howard Kass Horizon Air, Jennifer Thompson US Airways, Jason Reisinger Horizon Air, Jeff Cole Warbelows Air Ventures, Art Warbelow ICEPR, Luis Irizarry Wings Air (Air Greco), Aaron Goerlich