alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 19.415 What must I do if a Federal agency excludes the participant or a principal after I enter into a covered transaction? ( a ) You as an agency official may continue covered transactions with an excluded person, or under which an excluded person is a principal, if the transactions were in existence when the person was excluded. You are not required to continue the transactions, however, and you may consider termination. You should make a decision about whether to terminate and the type of termination action, if any, only after a thorough review to ensure that the action is proper.
( b ) You may not renew or extend covered transactions (other than no-cost time extensions) with any excluded person, or under which an excluded person is a principal, unless you obtain an exception under § 19.120.
**
**Exhibit 31**

**Certifications**

I,Richard Simpson, certify that: 

1.    I have reviewed this report onForm 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report onForm 10-K of Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2016-P6 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4.    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of RegulationAB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and 

5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their relatedattestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reportshave been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I havereasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association; CWCapital Asset Management LLC; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC; Deutsche Bank Trust CompanyAmericas; Principal Real Estate Investors, LLC; Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; KeyBank National Association; CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc.; National Tax Search, LLC; Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC; Trimont Real EstateAdvisors, LLC; AEGON USA Realty Advisors, LLC; and LNR Partners, LLC. 

Date:     November 27, 2019 

 

/s/ Richard Simpson

Richard Simpson

President, Citigroup CommercialMortgage Securities Inc. (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)

 
CGCMT 2016-P6 Certifications (2018) 

**
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 155 (Thursday, August 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 40823]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19425]



[[Page 40823]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the 
Board of Scientific Counselors, NIAAA.
    The meeting will be open to the public as indicated below, with 
attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend 
and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or 
other reasonable accommodations, should notify the Contact Person 
listed below in advance of the meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in 
accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of 
individual intramural programs and projects conducted by the National 
Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, including consideration of 
personnel qualifications and performance, and the competence of 
individual investigators, the disclosure of which would constitute a 
clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Board of Scientific Counselors, NIAAA.
    Date: September 23-24, 2009.
    Open: September 23, 2009, 8:15 a.m. to 8:30 a.m.
    Agenda: Program reports and presentations.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, 
Bethesda, MD 20892.

    Closed: September 23, 2009, 8:30 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate the Laboratory of Membrane 
Biochemistry and Biophysics (LMBB).
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, 
Bethesda, MD 20892.

    Closed: September 24, 2009, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate the Laboratory of Molecular 
Signaling and Metabolic Control.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, 
Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Trish Scullion, Chief of Administrative Branch, 
National Institute of Health, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse, 
and Alcoholism, 5635 Fishers Lane, Room 3061, Rockville, MD 20852. 
301-443-6076.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants; 93.701, ARRA Related Biomedical 
Research and Research Support Awards, National Institutes of Health, 
HHS)


    Dated: August 6, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-19425 Filed 8-12-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### § 0.106 Corrective action.

An employee's violation of generally accepted rules of conduct, the standards in this part, or the standards in other applicable regulations may result in appropriate corrective or disciplinary action, in addition to any penalty prescribed by law.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ENGINEERS

Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc. (Williamson) hereby consents to the
reference to Williamson and our report entitled "Evaluation of Oil and Gas
Reserves to the Interests of Western Gas Resources, Inc. in the Black Lake
Field, Natchitoches Parish, Louisiana, Effective June 30, 1996, for Disclosure
to the Securities and Exchange Commission, Williamson Project 6.8418" in the
Western Gas Resources, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly report ended September
30, 1996 to be filed on November 8, 1996.



                                          WILLIAMSON PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS, INC.



Houston, Texas
November 7, 1996
u L.'^y.^L ^ Jk. 

," V-7 C<^ sj^ MAC "-it-*^ 

ICICLE 

January 12,2011 

3-007 

"PARTMENT Of 

AI'ISPORTATION 

:•: J OPERATiONS 

JAN i 3 P 3: U2 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary 

U.S. Dept of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.B. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Re: Continuation of Alaska Airlines' Essential Air Service to Cordova, Gustavus, Petersburg, Wnu^ell, 

and Yakutat, Docket OST-1998-4899 

usseni 

Dear Secretary LaHood, 

I am writing in support of the continuation of Alaska Airlines' essential air service to Petersburg, Alaska. 

As the largest employer and air freight customer in Petersburg, we are critically aware of the continued 

need for the Jet service Alaska Airlines has provided to our community for well over thirty years. 

Seafood is the economic engine of our community. Moving products to markets, transporting employees 

and connecting fishermen with needed parts b crucial to the economic well being of our company and 

community as it allows us to be competitive with other ports. Alaska Airlines provides service that 

allows us to easily connect with other flights throughout Alaska and to the other 49 states. Their 

investment in navigation technology has resulted m improved reliability during inclement weather. 

Reducing flight diversions and cancellations helps Petersburg's businesses and passengers. The 737-400 

"combi" aiiaaft used by Alaska Airlines allows for passenger, mail, freight and cargo service that is very 

dependable. A non-jet carrier would simply be unable to provide this same level of service. 

We respectfully encourage you to continue Alaska Airlme's essential air service in Southeast Alaska. 

Thank you for your consideration. 

Sincerely, 

KrisNorosz 

Qovemment Affairs 

cc: Ms. Susan Kurland, Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs 

Mr. Dennis DeVany, Chief, EAS and Domestic Analysis 

The Honorable Sean Pamell, Govemor, State of Alaska 

Marc A. Luiken, Commissioner, Alaska State Department of Transportation and Public Facilities 

PETERSBURG RSHERIES 

A DIVISION OF ICICLE SEAFOODS, INC. 

P.O. Box 1147 • Petersburg, AK 99833 • Tel: 907-772-4294 • Fax: 907-772-4472
#### § 1.312-4 Examples of adjustments provided in section 312(c).

The adjustments provided in section 312(c) may be illustrated by the following examples:

# Example 1.

On December 2, 1954, Corporation X distributed to its sole shareholder, A, an individual, as a dividend in kind a vacant lot which was not an inventory asset. On that date, the lot had a fair market value of $5,000 and was subject to a mortgage of $2,000. The adjusted basis of the lot was $3,100. The amount of the earnings and profits was $10,000. The amount of the dividend received by A is $3,000 ($5,000, the fair market value, less $2,000, the amount of the mortgage) and the reduction in the earnings and profits of Corporation X is $1,100 ($3,100, the basis, less $2,000, the amount of mortgage).

# Example 2.

The facts are the same as in *Example (1)* above with the exception that the amount of the mortgage to which the property was subject was $4,000. The amount of the dividend received by A is $1,000, and there is no reduction in the earnings and profits of the corporation as a result of the distribution (disregarding such reduction as may result from an increase in tax to Corporation X because, of gain resulting from the distribution). There is a gain of $900 recognized to Corporation X, the difference between the basis of the property ($3,100) and the amount of the mortgage ($4,000), under section 311(c) and an increase in earnings and profits of $900.

# Example 3.

Corporation A, having accumulated earnings and profits of $100,000, distributed in kind to its shareholders, not in liquidation, inventory assets which had a basis to it on the “Lifo” method (section 472) of $46,000 and on the basis of cost or market (section 471) of $50,000. The inventory had a fair market value of $55,000 and was subject to a liability of $35,000. This distribution results in a net decrease in earnings and profits of Corporation A of $11,000, (without regard to any tax on Corporation A) computed as follows:

| “Fifo” basis of inventory | $50,000 | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Less: “Lifo” basis of inventory | 46,000 | |
| Gain recognized—addition to earnings and profits (section 311(b)) | $4,000 |
| Adjustment to earnings and profits required by section 312(b)(1)(A): | | |
| Fair market value of inventory | $55,000 | |
| Less: “Lifo” basis plus adjustment under section 311(b) | 50,000 | 5,000 |
| Total increase in earnings and profits | 9,000 |
| Decrease in earnings and profits—under section 312(b)(1)(B)(i) | $55,000 | |
| Less: Liability assumed | 35,000 | |
| Net amount of distribution (decrease in earnings) | 20,000 |
| Net decrease in earnings and profits | 11,000 |
39905.

#### MANION v. KNIGHT et al.

Jordan, Judge.

This was a bail trover action filed in the Civil and Criminal Court of DeKalb County on August 28, 1962, by Louis L. Manion against Brady Knight. The defendant on October 1, 1962, filed his answer to the petition and on the same date the Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance Company filed an intervention in the action. Subsequently, the plaintiff demurred to the defendant’s answer and filed a motion to disallow and strike the intervention. The exception is to the judgment of the trial court of October 29, 1962, overruling the plaintiff’s demurrer to the answer and denying the motion to disallow and strike the intervention. *Held:*

“This court will take notice of its own lack of jurisdiction and, where such lack appears, will dismiss the writ of error even without a motion to that effect by the defendant in error.” *Personal Credit Corp. v. Goldwire,*88 Ga. App. 125 (76 SE2d 129). Accordingly, where the only assignments of error in the bill of exceptions before this court are to the orders of the trial court overruling the plaintiff’s demurrer to the defendant’s answer and denying the plaintiff’s motion to disallow and strike an intervention by a third party, neither of which is a final judgment within the purview of *Code Ann.*§ 6-701; *Personal Credit Corp. v. Goldwire,*supra; *Gay v. Greene,*91 Ga. App. 78 (1) (84 SE2d 847); *Sundy v. Allgood,*93 Ga. App. 741 (92 SE2d 726); *Pope v. Pope,*207 Ga. 240 (1) (60 SE2d 376); *Edward v. Bynum,*48 Ga. App. 149 (1) (172 SE 117), this court is without jurisdiction to entertain the writ of error and it must be dismissed.

*271Decided January 28, 1963.

*Joseph C. Rary,*for plaintiff in error.

*Powell, Goldstein, Frazer •& Murphy, James K. Rankin, James K. Mozely,*contra.

*Writ of error dismissed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Frankum, J., concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000857507
<NAME>                        ENEX 88-89 INCOME & RETIREMENT FUND-SERIES 5, L.P.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   mar-31-1997
<CASH>                                         8643
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  22577
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               31220
<PP&E>                                         1011033
<DEPRECIATION>                                 958602
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 83651
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          28847
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     54804
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   83651
<SALES>                                        16711
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               16711
<CGS>                                          2402
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2402
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   11709
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
August 31, 2015 Court of Appeals Third District of Texas P.O
. Box 12547 Austin , Tx. 78711 Tom McMinn Official Court Reporter County Court at Law No . 4 405 MLK, Box 17 Georgetown, Tx 78626 (512)943- 1682

RE : Court of Appeals No. 03- 15-00379-CV Trial Court Case No. 15-0748-CC4 Style : Adrian Sanchez, et al v. Yellow Orchid, LLC Dear M s. Strother, I am in receipt of your letting concerning the above cause . The record was due August 10, 2015 . It is now due September 4, 2015. While appellants did contact me regarding the Reporter's Record, as ofyet no arrangement of payment has been made. The record is not long and will not take long to prepare once payment is made. Sincerely, Tom McMinn 

# ..
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                           JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                                       3,737
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                1,294
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   335
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 0
<PP&E>                                                      10,354
<DEPRECIATION>                                              10,223
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               8,839
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            0
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                                   8,319
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 8,839
<SALES>                                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             1,755
<CGS>                                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  758
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                24
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                997
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            997
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   997
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 4.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0
        

</TABLE>
#### Thomas M. HACKLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of NORTH CAROLINA; Ronald L. Moore, District Attorney; John Joseph Miller, III, Buncombe County Sheriff, Buncombe County Sheriffs Office; Bobby Lee Medford, Defendants-Appellees. Thomas M. Hackler, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of North Carolina; Buncombe County Sheriff, Buncombe County Sheriffs Office; John Joseph Miller, III; Ronald L. Moore, District Attorney; Bobby Lee Medford, Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 02-6353, 02-6358.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 30, 2002.

Decided June 6, 2002.

Thomas M. Hackler, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM Opinion.

*621PER CURIAM.

Thomas M. Hackler appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaints. We have reviewed the records and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm both orders on the reasoning of the district court. *See Hackler v. North Carolina,*Nos. CA-02-20-MU-1-2 & CA-02-23-1-2-MU (W.D.N.C., filed Jan. 31, 2002; entered Feb. 4, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Telex Communications Intermediate
Holdings, LLC and Telex Communications, Inc. (collectively, the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic Report"), Raymond V.
Malpocher, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Gregory W. Richter, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

      (1) The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company as of June 30, 2005.

/s/ Raymond V. Malpocher
---------------------------

Raymond V. Malpocher
President and Chief Executive Officer
Dated: July 29, 2005

/s/ Gregory W. Richter
---------------------------

Gregory W. Richter
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Dated: July 29, 2005