alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Pamela Gascoyne et al., Plaintiffs, v Occidental Chemical Corporation, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Joseph Davis, Inc., Third-Party Defendant, and Transcontinental Insurance Company, Also Known as CNA Insurance Company, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

[804 NYS2d 176]

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Amy J. Fricano, J.), entered November 23, 2004. The judgment, inter alia, granted the motion of defendant and third-party plaintiff for summary judgment and denied the cross motion of third-party defendant Transcontinental Insurance Company, also known as CNA Insurance Company, for summary judgment.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action seeking damages for injuries sustained by Pamela Gascoyne (plaintiff) when she slipped on an icy road while wallring to her work site. Defendant, the owner of the work site, commenced a third-party action against plaintiffs employer and Transcontinental Insurance Company, also known as CNA Insurance Company (CNA), which had issued a policy to plaintiffs employer for the project. Supreme Court properly granted the motion of defendant and third-party plaintiff for summary judgment declaring that CNA is obligated to defend and indemnify it in the underlying action *1022commenced by plaintiffs. The insurance policy at issue covered “ ‘employees’ ... for acts within the scope of their employment ... or while performing duties related to the conduct of . . . business.” Contrary to CNA’s contention, plaintiff was engaged in an act within the meaning of that policy language at the time of her injury. It is undisputed that plaintiff had signed in at a guard shack and was walking toward trailers at her work site when she slipped and fell. “[B]ecause [plaintiffs] work necessarily required [her] to use the [road] to . . . reach and leave [her] workplace, the injuries in the underlying action arose out of the work [within the meaning of the policy language]” *(Daily News v OCS Sec.,*280 AD2d 576, 577 [2001]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Martoche, Pine and Hayes, JJ.
www.gpo.gov

### §608a. Sale of tribal trust lands, etc.

#### (a) Title subsequent to sale

Title to tribal trust lands, interests, improvements, or rights sold by the Secretary to individual members of the Yakima Tribes or exchanged by the Secretary for lands held under trust patent or other restrictions against alienation by individual members of the tribes and other Indians or for lands in heirship status shall be held by the United States in trust for the individual Indian or Indians concerned.

#### (b) Credit of proceeds to tribal funds

Sums derived from the sale of tribal trust lands interests, improvements, and rights shall be credited to the tribal funds of the Yakima Tribes.

(July 28, 1955, ch. 423, §2, 69 Stat. 393; Pub. L. 88–540, §2, Aug. 31, 1964, 78 Stat. 748.)

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of act Aug. 9, 1946, ch. 933, 60 Stat. 968, which comprises this subchapter.

#### Amendments

1964—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 88–540 struck out provisions that title to lands, interests, improvements, or rights acquired under section 608 of this title by the Secretary for the Yakima Tribes through purchase or exchange shall be held by the United States in trust for the Yakima Tribes.

#### Section Referred to in Other Sections

This section is referred to in sections 465, 608, 608b, 608c of this title.
#### April WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA; Stanislaus County Superior Court, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-16569.

D.C. No. CV-00-07171-REC.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 10, 2002.*

Decided June 17, 2002.

Before O’SCANNLAIN, BERZON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

April Williams appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing for failure to state a claim her action alleging that the Stanislaus County Superior Court violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), Rehabilitation Act, and 14th Amendment when it declined to appoint her counsel in a civil action despite her partial mental handicap. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

We review de novo the district court’s dismissal under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). *Zimmerman v. City of Oakland,*255 F.3d 734, 737 (9th Cir.2001). The district court properly determined that Williams’s ADA and Rehabilitation Act claims fail because she did not allege that she was denied appointed counsel on the basis of her disability. *See Weinreich v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority,*114 F.3d 976, 978 (9th Cir.1997). The district court properly determined that Williams’s 14th Amendment claim was fatally flawed because a court is not considered a “person” under the law. *See Greater Los Angeles Council on Deafness, Inc. v. Zolin,*812 F.2d 1103, 1110 (9th Cir.1987). For these reasons, the district court properly determined that amendment of Williams’s complaint would be futile. *See Cato v. United States,*70 F.3d 1103, 1106 (9th Cir.1995).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Williams in forma pauperis status after determining she could afford to pay its filing fee. *See O’Loughlin v. Doe,*920 F.2d 614, 616-17 (9th Cir. 1990).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying appointed counsel because Williams did not show exceptional circumstances. *See Bums v. County of King,*883 F.2d 819, 823 (9th Cir.1989).

Williams’s remaining contentions lack merit.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### § 1020.300 General.

Banks are subject to the reporting requirements set forth and cross referenced in this subpart. Banks should also refer to Subpart C of Part 1010 of this chapter for reporting requirements contained in that subpart which apply to banks.
IA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 58

Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution of the United

States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 19, 1995

Mr. HOKE introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution

of the United States.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission

9 for ratification:
2

•HJ 58 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE—

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. Congress may not increase the limit on

3 the debt of the United States held by the public without

4 the approval of three-fifths of the whole number of each

5 House of Congress.

6 ‘‘SECTION 2. No bill to increase tax revenue shall be7 come law unless approved by three-fifths of the whole

8 number of each House of Congress.

9 ‘‘SECTION 3. Congress may waive the provisions of

10 this Article for any fiscal year in which a declaration of

11 war is in effect. The provisions of this Article may be

12 waived for any fiscal year in which the United States faces

13 an imminent and serious military threat to national secu14 rity and is so declared by a joint resolution, adopted by

15 a majority of the whole number of each House, which be16 comes law.

17 ‘‘SECTION 4. Congress shall enforce and implement

18 this Article by appropriate legislation.

19 ‘‘SECTION 5. This Article shall take effect for the fis20 cal year 2002 or for the second fiscal year beginning after

21 its ratification, whichever is later.’’.

Æ
# L_2019037EN.01011201.xml

| 8.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 37/112 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 37/112

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2019/231

of 7 February 2019

on the minimum selling price for skimmed milk powder for the 32nd partial invitation to tender within the tendering procedure opened by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1),

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1240 of 18 May 2016 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to public intervention and aid for private storage (2), and in particular Article 32 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080 (3) has opened the sale of skimmed milk powder by a tendering procedure. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080 (3) has opened the sale of skimmed milk powder by a tendering procedure.

| (2) | In the light of the tenders received for the 32nd partial invitation to tender, a minimum selling price should be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In the light of the tenders received for the 32nd partial invitation to tender, a minimum selling price should be fixed.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 32nd partial invitation to tender for the selling of skimmed milk powder within the tendering procedure opened by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080, in respect of which the period during which tenders were to be submitted ended on 5 February 2019, the minimum selling price shall be 162,20 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 February 2019.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Jerzy PLEWA

Director-General

Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 206, 30.7.2016, p. 71.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080 of 25 November 2016 opening the sale of skimmed milk powder by a tendering procedure (OJ L 321, 29.11.2016, p. 45).

3

---
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1128

To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide an additional place for

holding court in the Southern District of New York.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 3, 1995

Mr. GILMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide an additional place for holding court in the Southern District

of New York.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 112(b) of title 28, United States Court, is

4 amended in the last sentence by striking ‘‘and White

5 Plains’’ and inserting ‘‘, White Plains, and the Town of

6 Walkill (or a suitable site nearby)’’.

Æ
79–008 

111TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 111–263 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE BILL (H.R. 324) 

TO ESTABLISH THE SANTA CRUZ VALLEY NATIONAL 

HERITAGE AREA, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2009.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. CARDOZA, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 760] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 760, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 324, the Santa 

Cruz Valley National Heritage Area Act, under a closed rule. The 

resolution provides for one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Natural Resources. 

The resolution waives all points of order against consideration of 

the bill except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The 

resolution provides that the amendment printed in this report shall 

be considered as adopted and provides that the bill, as amended, 

shall be considered as read. The resolution waives all points of 

order against provisions of the bill, as amended. This waiver does 

not affect the point of order available under clause 9 of rule XXI 

(regarding earmark disclosure). The resolution provides one motion 

to recommit with or without instructions. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

Although the rule waives all points of order against consideration 

of the bill (except for those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule 

XXI), and all points of order against provisions in the bill, as 

amended, the Committee is not aware of any points of order 

against the bill or its consideration. The waivers are prophylactic. 


bajohnson on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with REPORTS
2 

COMMITTEE VOTES

The results of each record vote on an amendment or motion to 

report, together with the names of those voting for and against, are 

printed below: 

Rules Committee record vote No. 251 

Date: September 22, 2009. 

Measure: H.R. 324. 

Motion by: Mr. Dreier. 

Summary of motion: To grant an open rule. 

Results: Defeated 2–6. 

Vote by Members: McGovern—Nay; Hastings—Nay; Matsui— 

Nay; Cardoza—Nay; Arcuri—Nay; Pingree—Nay; Dreier—Yea; 

Foxx—Yea. 

SUMMARY OF THE AMENDMENT TO BE CONSIDERED AS ADOPTED

Provides that nothing in the bill modifies, alters, or amends any 

border enforcement authority. 

TEXT OF THE AMENDMENT TO BE CONSIDERED AS 

ADOPTED 

Page 15, line 25, strike ‘‘or’’. 

Page 16, line 3, strike the period and insert ‘‘; or’’. 

Page 16, after line 3, insert the following: 

(4) modifies, alters, or amends any border enforcement authority. 

Æ 


bajohnson on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with REPORTS
# L_2021355DE.01014201.xml

| 7.10.2021 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 355/142 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.10.2021

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 355/142

---

Berichtigung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) 2019/1163 der Kommission vom 5. Juli 2019 zur Änderung und Festlegung einer einzigen Liste der Anhänge mit den Kontaktdaten der zuständigen Behörden der Mitgliedstaaten und der Anschrift für Notifikationen an die Europäische Kommission über bestimmte Verordnungen über restriktive Maßnahmen

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 182 vom 8. Juli 2019
  )

Seite 38, Anhang:

Anstatt:

„DEUTSCHLAND

http://www.bmwi.de/DE/Themen/Außenwirtschaft/außenwirtschaftsrecht,did=404888.html“

muss es heißen:

„DEUTSCHLAND

http://www.bmwi.de/DE/Themen/Aussenwirtschaft/aussenwirtschaftsrecht,did=404888.html“.

---
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Properties III
      L.P.
      (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 29, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Neal Ludeke, Chief Financial Officer of Richman Housing Credits Inc., general
      partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties III L.P., general partner of the
      Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Registrant.






/s/
      Neal
      Ludeke





Neal
      Ludeke


Chief
      Financial Officer of Richman


Housing
      Credits Inc., general partner


of
      Richman Tax Credit Properties III


L.P.,
      General Partner of the Registrant


March
      14,
      2008
IA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 72

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States with

respect to the right to life.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 1, 1995

Mr. OBERSTAR (for himself, Mr. BURTON, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, and Mr. SMITH of New Jersey) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States with respect to the right to life.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein, That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, to be valid only if ratified

6 by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States

7 within seven years after the date of final passage of this

8 joint resolution:
2

HJ 72 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE—

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. With respect to the right to life, the

3 word ‘person’ as used in this article and in the fifth and

4 fourteenth articles of amendment to the Constitution of

5 the United States applies to all human beings irrespective

6 of age, health, function, or condition of dependency, in7 cluding their unborn offspring at every stage of their bio8 logical development.

9 ‘‘SECTION 2. No unborn person shall be deprived of

10 life by any person: Provided, however, That nothing in this

11 article shall prohibit a law permitting only those medical

12 procedures required to prevent the death of the mother.

13 ‘‘SECTION 3. The Congress and the several States

14 shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate leg15 islation.’’.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Health Resources and Services Administration 

# For Further Information Contact:

                        Anyone requiring information regarding the ACCV should contact Kay Cook, DVIC, HSB, HRSA, Room 11C-26, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857; telephone (301) 443-6593 or e-mail:                         *kcook@hrsa.gov*.                    

Dated: August 4, 2009. 

Alexandra Huttinger, 

Director, Division of Policy Review and Coordination. 

 [FR Doc. E9-19109 Filed 8-10-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4165-15-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.6333-1 Production of books.

If a levy has been made or is about to be made on any property or rights to property, any person, having custody or control of any books or records containing evidence or statements relating to the property or rights to property subject to levy, shall, upon demand of the internal revenue officer who has made or is about to make the levy, exhibit such books or records to such officer.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

SHEILA SUMMERS

,

Respondent Below

- Appellant,

v.

CHARLES GARRISON

,

P etitioner Below

- Appellee. §

§ No. 373 , 2017

§

§

§ Court Below

— Family Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§

§ File No. CN15

- 06533

§ Pet Nos. 17

- 12801 and

§ 17

- 15979

§

Submitted: November 20 , 2017

Decided: November 30 , 2017

O R D E R

This 30 th day of November 2017

, it appears to the Court that, on October 31

,

2017, the C hief Deputy Clerk issued a notice to the appellant to show cause why h er

appeal should not be dismissed for her fail ure to pay the Family Court appeal fee

and for failure to file a completed motion to proceed in forma pauperis as directed

by the Court

. T he a ppellant failed to re spond to the notice to show cause within the

required ten

- day period. Dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, under Supreme Court

Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the within appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr.

Justice
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 69 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J. Res.69

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
  the fourth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-five

                            Joint Resolution

 
Providing for the reappointment of Homer Alfred Neal as a citizen regent 
         of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 
43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian 
Institution, in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by 
reason of the expiration of the term of Homer Alfred Neal of Michigan 
on December 6, 1995, is filled by the reappointment of the incumbent 
for a term of six years, effective December 7, 1995.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```