alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 50 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                        Calendar No. 70
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 50

                          [Report No. 104-47]

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             February 2 (legislative day, January 30), 1995

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

                April 7 (legislative day, April 5), 1995

              Reported by Mr. Murkowski, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 To designate the visitor center at the Channel Islands National Park, 
      California, as the ``Robert J. Lagomarsino Visitor Center''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The visitor center at the Channel Islands National Park, 
California, is designated as the ``Robert J. Lagomarsino Visitor 
Center''.

SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

    Any reference in any law, regulation, document, record, map, or 
other paper of the United States to the visitor center referred to in 
section 1 is deemed to be a reference to the ``Robert J. Lagomarsino 
Visitor Center''.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 1, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                     

                                                        Calendar No. 70

104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 50

                          [Report No. 104-47]

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 To designate the visitor center at the Channel Islands National Park, 
      California, as the ``Robert J. Lagomarsino Visitor Center''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                April 7 (legislative day, April 5), 1995

                      Reported without amendment
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jarvis J. Streeter, Appellant.

[803 NYS2d 474]

Appeal from a judgment of the Wayne County Court (Dennis M. Kehoe, J.), rendered March 3, 2004. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts).

*1114It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: By failing to move to withdraw his plea of guilty or to vacate the judgment of conviction, defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that the plea colloquy was factually insufficient *(see People v Johnson,*82 NY2d 683, 685 [1993]; *People v Lopez,*71 NY2d 662, 665-666 [1988]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the plea colloquy does not call into question the voluntariness of the plea, and thus the narrow exception to the preservation requirement does not apply herein *(see Lopez,*71 NY2d at 666). Contrary to defendant’s further contention, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Hurlbutt, Gorski and Smith, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.6229(f)-1 Special rule for partial settlement agreements. ( a ) *In general.* If a partner enters into a settlement agreement with the Internal Revenue Service with respect to the treatment of some of the partnership items or partnership-level determinations of any penalty, addition to tax, or additional amount in dispute for a partnership taxable year, but one or more other partnership items or determinations remain in dispute, the period of limitations for assessing any tax attributable to the settled items shall be determined as if such agreement had not been entered into.
( b ) *Other items remaining in dispute.* Pursuant to section 6226(c), a partner is a party to a partnership-level judicial proceeding with respect to partnership items and partnership-level determinations of penalties, additions to tax or additional amounts. When a partner settles partnership items, the settled partnership items convert to nonpartnership items under section 6231(b)(1)(C) and will not be subject to any future or pending partnership-level proceeding pursuant to section 6226(d)(1). The remaining unsettled partnership items, as well as any unsettled penalty, addition to tax, or additional amount that relates to an adjustment to a partnership item (regardless of whether the partnership item to which it relates has been settled), however, will remain subject to determination under partnership-level administrative and judicial procedures. Consequently, any remaining unsettled items, including any unsettled penalty, addition to tax, or additional amount that relates to an adjustment to a partnership item, will be deemed to remain in dispute. Thus, the period for assessing any tax attributable to the settled items will be governed by the period for assessing any tax attributable to the remaining unsettled items.
( c ) *Effective date.* This section is applicable to partnership taxable years beginning on or after October 4, 2001. For years beginning prior to October 4, 2001, see § 301.6229(f)-1T contained in 26 CFR part 1, revised April 1, 2001.
[T.D. 8965, 66 FR 50555, Oct. 4, 2001]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0000857507
<NAME>                          Enex 88-89 Income & Retirement Fund - Sr 5, L.P.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   sep-30-1996
<CASH>                                         4840
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  15597
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               20437
<PP&E>                                         1011033
<DEPRECIATION>                                 958275
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 73195
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          36010
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     37185
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   73195
<SALES>                                        44891
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               44891
<CGS>                                          842
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  20294
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               19452
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   24597
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned
officers of Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 (the Form 10-Q), of the Company fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: July 30, 2013



By:

/s/ William J. DoyleWilliam J. DoylePresident and Chief Executive Officer


Date: July 30, 2013



By:

/s/ Wayne R. BrownleeWayne R. BrownleeExecutive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of
Regulation S-K, section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
#### In the Matter of Rashaan Williams, Appellant, v Robert Dennison, as Chairman of New York State Division of Parole, Respondent.

[803 NYS2d 468]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County (Mark H. Dadd, A.J.), entered August 3, 2004 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment dismissed the petition to review the determination of respondent denying petitioner’s request for release to parole.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs as moot *(see Matter of Ansari v Travis,*9 AD3d 901 [2004], *lv denied*3 NY3d 610 [2004]). Present—Green, J.P., Gorski, Smith, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.
Attachment E-2: AWS Facilities to be Audited under the SPCC Protocol

1

Number Address City State Zipcode

1 5515 LA PALMA AVENUE ANAHEIM CALIFORNIA 92807

2 300 KINETIC DR OXNARD CALIFORNIA 93030

3 1750 HOWE AVENUE SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA 95825

4 7480 CONVOY COURT SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA 92111

5 I-80 AND RATTLESNAKE ROAD SIGNAL PEAK SODA SPRINGS CALIFORNIA 95728

6 6855 WEST EIGHT MILE ROAD STOCKTON CALIFORNIA 95219

7 12150 RESEARCH PKWY ORLANDO FLORIDA 32826

8 16182 COMMONWEALTH AVE N POLK CITY FLORIDA 33868

9 500 KAHELU AVE MILILANI HAWAII 96789

10 KUKAIAU RANCH PAAUILO HAWAII 96776

11 7336 E 90TH ST INDIANAPOLIS INDIANA 46256

12 4157 109TH ST URBANDALE IOWA 50322

13 12 SAUNDERS WAY WESTBROOK MAINE 04092

14 9000 Mendenhall Court COLUMBIA MARYLAND 21045

15 155 NORTHBOROUGH DRIVE SOUTHBOROUGH MASSACHUSETTS 01772

16 3422 LOUSMA DR WYOMING MICHIGAN 49548

17 5451 PHANTOM DRIVE HAZELWOOD MISSOURI 63042

18 118 S 19TH STREET OMAHA NEBRASKA 68102

19 745 EAST TROPICANA AVENUE LAS VEGAS NEVADA 89119

20 198 ARMSTRONG RD NEW HYDE PARK NEW YORK 11040

21 3709 Wireless Drive GREENSBORO NORTH CAROLINA 27407

22 2002 Pisgah Church Rd GREENSBORO NORTH CAROLINA 27455

23 3201 QUAIL SPRINGS PKWY OKLAHOMA CITY OKLAHOMA 73134

24 270 BILMAR DR PITTSBURGH PENNSYLVANIA 15205

25 485 LASLEY AVE WILKES-BARRE PENNSYLVANIA 18706

26 5177 Commerce Drive YORK PENNSYLVANIA 17408

27 279 JENCKES HILL ROAD SMITHFIELD RHODE ISLAND 02917

28 4400 STAGGERBRUSH ROAD AUSTIN TEXAS 78749

29 13733 NEUTRON DRIVE FARMERS BRANCH TEXAS 75244

30 900 DOROTHY DRIVE RICHARDSON TEXAS 75081

31 978 Regional Park Road LEBANON VIRGINIA 24266

32 20307 North Creek Parkway Bothell WASHINGTON 98011
Attachment E-2: AWS Facilities to be Audited under the SPCC Protocol

2

Number Address City State Zipcode

33 3755 MONTE VILLA PKWY BOTHELL WASHINGTON 98021

34 14520 NE 87th STREET REDMOND WASHINGTON 98052

35 SEGELSON RIDGE OFF SWEDE HEAVEN RD DARRINGTON WASHINGTON 98241

36 1.25 MILES SOUTH SOUTHEAST OF SKYKOMISH SKYKOMISH WASHINGTON 98288

37 10906 E MARIETTA AVE SPOKANE WASHINGTON 99206

38 757 S FAWCETT AVE TACOMA WASHINGTON 98402

39 955 BROADWAY TACOMA WASHINGTON 98402

40 2975 BENEDICT RD CULLODEN WEST VIRGINIA 25526

41 5825 NORTH 99TH ST MILWAUKEE WISCONSIN 53225
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 175 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J. Res.175

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

                            Joint Resolution

 
 Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1996, and 
                           for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 104-99 is 
further amended by striking out ``April 24, 1996'' in sections 106(c), 
112, 126(c), 202(c), and 214 and inserting in lieu thereof ``April 25, 
1996''; and that Public Law 104-92 is further amended by striking out 
``April 24, 1996'' in section 106(c) and inserting in lieu thereof 
``April 25, 1996''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23
- 40630 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,** versus **Rodolfo Carranza Maldonado,** Defendant

— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:23
- CR
- 474 - 1

**__________ ____________________**  Before **King, Haynes,** and **Graves,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rodolfo Carranza Maldonado has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Carranza Maldonado has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brie f and the relevant portions of the

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 6, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-40630 Document: 46-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/06/2024No. 23
- 40630

2 record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED** . See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2 . Case: 23-40630 Document: 46-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/06/2024
39818.

#### WHITEHEAD v. THE STATE.

Decided November 14, 1962.

*Kimzey & Kimzey, Irwin B. Kimzey, Herbert B. Kimzey,*for plaintiff in error.

*Ben F. Carr, Solicitor General,*contra.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

1. It appears that the first excerpt is taken from § 5 of the act of 1939 (Ga. L. 1939, p. 288), and was given in charge as it appears in *Code Ann.*§ 42-714, while the second excerpt is taken from § 7 of such act and was given in charge as it appears in *Code Ann.*§ 42-9925. Ordinarily a charge in the exact language of the law is not confusing or misleading to the jury. However, there are exceptions and “where the charge in a criminal case is so obscure or confused as not to enlighten the jury on the law of the case a new trial will result.” *Thomas v. State,*67 Ga. 767. And, as was said by Judge Powell in *Holland v. State,*3 Ga. App. 465 (5) (60 SE 205): “The court in his instructions to the jury should be careful to guard against using abstract legal quotations and senten*16tious judicial utterances in such manner as to make them misleading under the particular circumstances of the case.”

Nowhere in the charge was the jury informed as to what drugs were set forth in *Code Ann.*§ 42-709 as being dangerous, nor was the jury informed as to what the provisions of §§ 42-708 to 42-716 were. The charges complained of were not explained elsewhere in the instructions and such charges as given would not enlighten the jury but would tend to be confusing. Accordingly, the trial court erred in overruling the defendant’s amended motion for new trial.

2. In as much as the evidence may not be the same on another trial the general grounds of the motion for new trial are not passed upon.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Frankum and Jordan, JJ., concur.*
# L_2019314EN.01017301.xml

| 5.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 314/173 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 314/173

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1982 of 28 November 2019 making certain imports of threaded tube or pipe cast fittings, of malleable cast iron and spheroidal graphite cast iron originating in the People’s Republic of China subject to registration following the re-opening of the investigation in order to implement the judgment of 20 September 2019, in case T-650/17, with regard to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1146 re-imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of threaded tube or pipe cast fittings, of malleable cast iron and spheroidal graphite cast iron, originating in the People’s Republic of China, manufactured by Jinan Meide Castings Co., Ltd

(Official Journal of the European Union L 308 of 29 November 2019)

Recital (8) is replaced with the following:

| ‘(8) | Following the General Court’s judgment, the Commission decided by means of a Notice (*1) (‘the re-opening Notice’), to partially re-open the anti-dumping investigation concerning imports of threaded tube or pipe cast fittings, of malleable cast iron, that led to the adoption of the anti-dumping Regulation at issue and to resume it at the point at which the irregularity occurred. The re-opening is limited in scope to the implementation of the judgment of the General Court with regard to Jinan Meide. |
| --- | --- |

‘(8)

Following the General Court’s judgment, the Commission decided by means of a Notice (*1) (‘the re-opening Notice’), to partially re-open the anti-dumping investigation concerning imports of threaded tube or pipe cast fittings, of malleable cast iron, that led to the adoption of the anti-dumping Regulation at issue and to resume it at the point at which the irregularity occurred. The re-opening is limited in scope to the implementation of the judgment of the General Court with regard to Jinan Meide.

---

(*1)  Notice of re-opening the investigation following the judgment of 20 September 2019, in Case T‐650/17, with regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1146 of 28 June 2017 re-imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of threaded tube or pipe cast fittings, of malleable cast iron and spheroidal graphite cast iron, originating in the People's Republic of China, manufactured by Jinan Meide Castings Co., Ltd (OJ C 403, 29.11.2019, p. 63).’

*1

---
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 01435

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 01435\01435_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

01435\01435_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

01435\01435_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 01435\01435_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01435\01435_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01435\01435_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01435\01435_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01435\01435_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

01435\Certification Statement Plant ID 01435.pdf Plant certification statement

x 01435\Revised Part A\01435_Part A_Revised.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01435\Revised Part A\Correspondance - Revised Outfall Coordinates.pdf

Email communications regarding questions on the 

survey response

x 01435\Revised Part A\Telecon - Revised Outfall Coordinates.doc Technical Review Correspondence

x 01435\Supplemental Documents\01435_A5-2 Map-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01435\Supplemental Documents\01435_A5-3 WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01435\Supplemental Documents\01435_C2-31 Fly Ash System Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

01435\Supplemental Documents\01435_C3-23 Bottom Ash System Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01435\Supplemental Documents\01435_D3-1 Pond-1 D-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01435\Supplemental Documents\01435_D3-1 Pond-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01435\Supplemental Documents\01435_Follow Up Questions.doc Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

01435\Supplemental Documents\01435_Submittal Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1192

To amend the Export Administration Act of 1979 to grant a private right

of action to persons injured by reason of a violation of the anti-boycott

provisions, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 9, 1995

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations, and in addition to the Committee on

the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker,

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To amend the Export Administration Act of 1979 to grant

a private right of action to persons injured by reason

of a violation of the anti-boycott provisions, and for

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION.

4 Section 11 of the Export Administration Act of 1979

5 (50 U.S.C. App. 2410) is amended by adding at the end

6 the following:
2

•HR 1192 IH

1 ‘‘(j) PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION.—Any person in2 jured in his or her business or property by reason of a

3 violation of the regulations issued pursuant to section 8(a)

4 may sue therefor in any appropriate United States district

5 court against the United States person committing the

6 violation and shall recover the damages such person sus7 tains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attor8 ney’s fee. In any such action the court may award punitive

9 damages. An action may be brought under this subsection

10 against a United States person whether or not the United

11 States person has been determined under this section to

12 have committed the violation on account of which the ac13 tion is brought.’’.

14 SEC. 2. CIVIL PENALTY FOR ANTI-BOYCOTT VIOLATION.

15 Section 11(c)(1) of the Export Administration Act of

16 1979 (50 U.S.C. App. 2410(c)(1)) is amended—

17 (1) by inserting ‘‘(A)’’ after ‘‘except that’’; and

18 (2) by striking the period at the end and insert19 ing ‘‘, and (B) the civil penalty for each such viola20 tion of the regulations issued under section 8 may

21 not exceed $50,000.’’.

Æ