alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 25.2524-1 Extent of deductions.

Under the provisions of section 2524, the charitable deduction provided for in section 2522 and the marital deduction provided for in section 2523 are allowable only to the extent that the gifts, with respect to which those deductions are authorized, are included in the “total amount of gifts” made during the “calendar period” (as defined in § 25.2502-1(c)(1)), computed as provided in section 2503 and § 25.2503-1 (i.e., the total gifts less exclusions). The following examples (in both of which it is assumed that the donor has previously utilized his entire $30,000 specific exemption provided by section 2521, which was in effect at the time) illustrate the application of the provisions of this section:

# Example (1).

A donor made transfers by gift to his spouse of $5,000 cash on January 1, 1971, and $1,000 cash on April 5, 1971. The donor made no other transfers during 1971. The first $3,000 of such gifts for the calendar year is excluded under the provisions of section 2503(b) in determining the “total amount of gifts” made during the first calendar quarter of 1971. The marital deduction for the first calendar quarter of $2,500 (one-half of $5,000) otherwise allowable is limited by section 2524 to $2,000. The amount of taxable gifts is zero ($5,000−$3,000 (annual exclusion) −$2,000 (marital deduction)). For the second calendar quarter of 1971, the marital deduction is $500 (one-half of $1,000); the amount excluded under section 2503(b) is zero because the entire $3,000 annual exclusion was applied against the gift in the first calendar quarter of 1971; and the amount of taxable gifts is $500 ($1,000−$500 (marital deduction)).

# Example (2).

The only gifts made by a donor to his spouse during calendar year 1969 were a gift of $2,400 in May and a gift of $3,000 in August. The first $3,000 of such gifts is excluded under the provisions of section 2503(b) in determining the “total amount of gifts” made during the calendar year. The marital deduction for 1969 of $2,700 (one-half of $2,400 plus one-half $3,000) otherwise allowable is limited by section 2524 to $2,400. The amount of taxable gifts is zero ($5,400−$3,000 (annual exclusion) −$2,400 (marital deduction)).

[T.D. 7238, 37 FR 28734, Dec. 29, 1972, as amended by T.D. 7910, 48 FR 40375, Sept. 7, 1983]
Letter Agreement between Robert Woods and SunGard Data Systems Inc.



 Exhibit 10.2 
 SUNGARD 
 June 26, 2012 
 Mr. Robert Woods 
 [address] 
 Dear Bob: 
 The following information summarizes the effect of your separation of employment,
effective July 1, 2012, on your SunGard Benefits and the terms that the Company has agreed to relative to extension of benefits: 
  

	 	•	 	 Your current Medical, Prescription Drug and Dental coverage will continue until July 31, 2012. 



 

	 	•	 	 All other current benefits will terminate as summarized in the attached Separation of Benefits Guide. 



 

	 	•	 	 Effective August 1, 2012, you are eligible for continued medical, dental and prescription drug coverage for a period of two years (until
July 31, 2014) under the following conditions: 


  

	 	•	 	 SunGard will issue you a check in the amount of $18,504.00 grossed up for applicable taxes. This amount represents the employer portion of the current
monthly premium for the CDHP Medical Plan (including prescription drug coverage) and the Dental Plan for you and your spouse for 24 months. 


  

	 	•	 	 You will submit a monthly payment to SunGard for the total monthly premium (employee and employer portion) as detailed in the attached letter from
Sandy Garcia 


  

	 	•	 	 During this two-year period, should the healthcare plans or providers change, you will be eligible for the same plans offered to the active employee
population. 


  

	 	•	 	 Effective August 1, 2014, for a period of up to 18 months, you have a right to continue your coverage for medical, prescription drugs and dental
under COBRA. It is your obligation to ensure that you elect COBRA coverage and pay the full cost of this coverage. A COBRA notification and election form will be sent to you separately by the Company’s third party COBRA administrator in advance
of the August 1, 2014 effective date. 


  

	 	•	 	 Effective February 1, 2016, after the COBRA period expires, you will be eligible to participate in the Retiree Health Access (RHA) pre- and
post-age 65 retiree medical plans, subject to the terms of such plans. These plans are not subsidized by the Company, so you will pay the total monthly premiums based upon the plans that you select. RHA reserves the right to amend or terminate such
plans at any time. While it is SunGard’s intention to continue access to these plans, the Company reserves the right to modify or terminate access to such plans at any time. An enrollment packet will be sent to you by RHA’s third party
administrator in advance of the effective date of this coverage. 


 If you have any questions, please feel free to contact
Michelle Bruno at 484-582-5636. 
 Sincerely, 
 /s/ Kathleen Weslock 
 Kathleen Weslock 
 chief human resources officer
## NUMBER 13
- 2 2
- 0 0 2 5 1
- CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ KYLE TRAMMELL , Appellant ,

v.
KYLIE TRAMMELL , Appellee

.

_ ___________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the County Court at Law of Aransas County, Texas.

_ ___________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Tijerina

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina
This matter is before the Court on appellant’s handwritten note received on May
31, 2022, which the Court construes as a motion for extension of time to file a notice of
appeal. We now dismiss the matter for lack of jurisdiction.2

On April 21 , 202 1 , the trial court signed a final protective order . Appellant filed a

no tice of appeal with the trial court on May 3 1, 2022 . On June 2 , 2022 , the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that it appeared that the appeal was not timely perfected. Appellant was advised that the appeal would be dismissed if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of the Court ’ s directive.
Appellant ’s motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal is untimely, as it

was filed more than fifteen days after the deadline for filing the notice of appeal

. T EX

. R

. A PP

. P. 26.3. We are to construe the rules of appellate procedure reasonably and liberally so that the right to appeal is not lost by imposing requirements not absolutely necessary

to effectuate the purpose of a rule. See Verburgt v. Dorner , 959 S.W.2d 6 15, 616

-
17 (Tex. 1997). Nevertheless, we are prohibited from enlarging the scope of our jurisdiction by enlarging the time for perfecting an appeal in a civil case in a manner not provided for by rule. See Tex. R. App. P. 2; In re T.W., 89 S.W.3d 641, 642 (Tex. App.

– Amarillo 2002, no pet.). Appellant’s notice of appeal was untimely , by more than a year , and appellant’s motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal is also untimely ; therefore, we lack
jurisdiction over the appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss appellant’s motion and entire cause

for lack of jurisdiction

. JAIME TIJERINA Justice

D elivered and filed on the 30th day of June , 202 2

.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OPEN-FILE REPORT 89-12
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PLATE 2

153 00

156 00 i 155 00 15e db
TM 69 00

69 00)

at Ane! 48 ia od : Pingaluliest | aS ‘pono iN
gee BES Z4us a ry 25 K Be & Ree gens 2644
é ES jae ARBRE et yes 8S, poe Reo c Aeczs aS (gesz Sd his eae R pa
A Uap 2381 : ~ Ke a8 2214 gars |
99 404 * 27 Agen age ¢ 2497 A288 252 . an wats Rife 0 17 16 a2 BA" 210,
78 C3 a
2090 2600 agers 7S ae A gies gf Bes amg ae Aza ateg, an,
: 2 - |
72 * 21a gi81 ° 2189
a7) | pgore zoos A428, gen a9 AbS89? re! 180 Ave AR? sod gn ui
Blog wt ; B77 Ee pit A e Ce. air7ygi7® , eyes ltl genes (tated yam ae Ais Ro ee aie
s ; ages = ia Ridge ei bie Sie
\ we ( ¢ 2386,
7-4 a 29 5 oe
Su, ars f mo 7yggioo a (MBB iap aAice BH lo, a as > gee)
po A A ARse9 3 ee ao Fae & ro 2 ne Sah ae Bate Ley <n ern REZ, ya S ,
a A |
a gs, a
ages gm Bae | ; 2202 Ae" y TM { ae Baws g308 4 5 zai jpygaie RE,
eee ee fe Am ba age i oa By oi Rn Ogee e Sz, irl
we fw Best ng an foe ny BP aitgaee eee Se ee
So L_twotuk AAgeee, Boas t
/ | ga , ne mat ;
201 gor? Ty peor 66 fee ? Se A pg203 Agee
on me Mem ge | a a sana com ts
la | : : ’ - aa
> i 276 > = .
Agen a B® pore Ais 27 tas azo MBIT? ie diss ie AR0e2 2420 ae oe
= gee aS is 2000 go79 geet 64 Aeais iKiktens ae? ae nt 1g.
oat ves ee gs weg oe
Z gi, aise ta ze as
“aa Laer agin AD as ol  G offe® ve (
feos Mes ae add a ans eK AN gow Ly pate mes ) a oe
ic SOUTH ROPNDARY UMIAT (ERUDIAN . Ayga7 kK : a
=) ne

fee at, el el eT | ge i‘ ant
mS a ( 5 AES,

of
5

ee GATES OE PH 5 CA ROE 2) NATION Ab PAR K

BREET ES
EXPLANATION
Stream Sediment Sample Localities

A Minus-100-mesh Samples
( LASL, 1982 )

SATES. OF THERRUTIOY
NATIONAL PARK

68 00 68 00

156 00 1 153 00
155 00 154 00
; SCALE 1:250 000 . . _ Fs a heomeciten
se from U.S. Geological Survey This map is preliminary and has no i
iB : = ma = oa ze _ 20 = aa 45 or reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological
it 7 5 Zz ij _ Survey editorial standards.
5 i?) 5 10 15 25 MILES
——— —= = == 5

SAMPLE LOCALITY MAP OF THE NURE STREAM-SEDIMENT SAMPLES FROM THE KILLIK RIVER QUADRANGLE, ALASKA
BY

J. M. MOTOOKA, E. M. ADRIAN, S. E. CHURCH, C. M. MCDOUGAL AND J. B. FIFE
II

Calendar No. 230

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 79

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 29 (legislative day, JUNE 19), 1995

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

NOVEMBER 9, 1995

Reported by Mr. HATCH, without amendment

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States authorizing the Congress and the States to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United

States.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the

4 following article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several
2

HJ 79 RS

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission

2 for ratification:

3 ‘‘ARTICLE—

4 ‘‘The Congress and the States shall have power to

5 prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United

6 States.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives June 28, 1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.

Calendar No. 230

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 79

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the

flag of the United States.States to prohibit the physical desecration of theUnited States authorizing the Congress and the

NOVEMBER 9, 1995

Reported without amendment
H. J. Res. 69

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the fourth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-five

Joint Resolution

Providing for the reappointment of Homer Alfred Neal as a citizen regent of the

Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance

with section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States

(20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other than Members of Congress,

occurring by reason of the expiration of the term of Homer Alfred

Neal of Michigan on December 6, 1995, is filled by the reappointment of the incumbent for a term of six years, effective December

7, 1995.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
No. 76-6449.

#### Hooper *v.*Virginia.

Sup. Ct. Va. Certiorari denied.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1139

To amend the Atlantic Striped Bass Conservation Act, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 6, 1995

Mr. SAXTON (for himself and Mr. STUDDS) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Resources

A BILL

To amend the Atlantic Striped Bass Conservation Act, and

for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as ‘‘The Striped Bass Act of

5 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. ATLANTIC STRIPED BASS CONSERVATION ACT

7 AMENDMENTS.

8 Section 7(a) of the Atlantic Striped Bass Conserva9 tion Act (Public Law 98–613, 16 U.S.C. 1851 note) is

10 amended by striking ‘‘1986’’ and all that follows through

11 ‘‘1994’’, and inserting instead ‘‘1995 and 1996’’.
2

HR 1139 IH

1 SEC. 3. ANADROMOUS FISH CONSERVATION ACT AMEND2 MENTS.

3 Section 7(d) of the Anadromous Fish Conservation

4 Act (16 U.S.C. 757g(d)) is amended by striking ‘‘1991,

5 1992, 1993, and 1994’’ and inserting instead ‘‘1995 and

6 1996’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT 10.11


 


PROMISSORY NOTE SECOND EXTENSION AGREEMENT


 





This Promissory Note Extension Agreement,
hereinafter referred to as “Extension”, entered into this Tenth day of August, 2012, by and among Intellinetics, Inc,
hereinafter called “Maker” and Alpharion Capital Partners, hereinafter called “Lender”.


 


WHEREAS, Maker and
Lender have entered into a Promissory Note and Subscription Agreement dated November 15, 2011 for the amount of THREE HUNDRED THOUSAND
AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($300,000), hereinafter referred to as “Note”. Said Note was originally due one hundred eighty days
from its issuance.


 


WHEREAS, Maker and
Lender have entered into a Promissory Note Extension Agreement dated May 7, 2012 for the amount of THREE HUNDRED THOUSAND AND NO/100
DOLLARS ($300,000), hereinafter referred to as the “Note Extension”. Said Note Extension was originally due two-hundred
seventy days from its issuance.


 


WHEREAS, Maker and
Lender desire to enter into this Second Extension Agreement in order to extend the due date of the Note.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, it
is dually agreed by both Maker and Lender to extend the due date of the Note from two hundred seventy days to a due date of July
1, 2013.


 


All other provisions
of the original Promissory Note, Subscription Agreement and Promissory Note Extension Agreement shall prevail unless otherwise
written.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the undersigned Maker and Lender has duly executed this Note as of the day and year above first written.


 


 


	 	INTELLINETICS, INC.	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ William J. Santiago	 
	 	Name: William J. Santiago	 
	 	Title: President and CEO	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	ALPHARION CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC.	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Rick Hughes	 
	 	Name: Rick Hughes	 
	 	Title: CEO
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

** **

** **

Reference is herebymade to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1,2016, by and among J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., asDepositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, MidlandLoan Services, A Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as SpecialServicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator,Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, and Pentalpha SurveillanceLLC, as Operating Advisor and as Asset Representations Reviewer, with respectto Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2016-C4 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section11.09 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.           A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period fromJanuary 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.           To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day ofFebruary 2019.

 

 

/s/ Leslie Hayton

Leslie Hayton 

Managing Director 

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 156 (Friday, August 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41109-41110]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19484]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Natural Resources Conservation Service

RIN 0578-AA48

Conservation Practice Technical Assistance

AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States 
Department of Agriculture.

ACTION: Notice; reopening of public comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On June 12, 2009, the Natural Resources Conservation Service 
(NRCS) published in the Federal Register a notice for the purpose of: 
(1) Notifying the public about the results of NRCS compliance with 
section 1242(h) of the Food Security Act of 1985, as amended; and (2) 
to solicit public comment about how to improve agency conservation 
practice standards. The public comment period closed on August 11, 
2009. NRCS is hereby reopening the public comment period and amending 
the closing date September 14, 2009 to ensure the agency has received 
comments from a broad segment of the agriculture sector.

DATES: Submit comments on or before September 14, 2009.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments using any of the following methods:
     Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending comments 
electronically.
     Mail: Norman Widman, National Agronomist, Ecological 
Sciences

[[Page 41110]]

Division, Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation 
Service, Conservation Practice Standard Comments, PO Box 2890, 
Washington, DC 20013.
     Fax: (202) 720-5334.
     E-mail: [email protected].
     Hand Delivery: USDA South Building, 1400 Independence 
Avenue, SW., Room 5234, Washington, DC 20250, between 9 a.m. and 4 
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays. Please ask the 
guard at the entrance to the South Building to call (202) 720-4630 in 
order to be escorted into the building.
     This notice may be accessed via Internet. Users can access 
the NRCS homepage at: http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/ gov/; select the Farm Bill 
link from the menu; select the Notices link under the heading Farm Bill 
Public Comments Links. Persons with disabilities who require 
alternative means for communication (Braille, large print, audio tape, 
etc.) should contact the USDA TARGET Center at: (202) 720-2600 (voice 
and TDD).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Norman Widman, National Agronomist, 
Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1400 
Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20250; Phone: (202) 720-3783; 
Fax: (202) 720-2646; or e-mail: [email protected].

    Signed this 7th day of August, 2009, in Washington, DC.
Virginia L. Murphy,
Acting Chief, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
[FR Doc. E9-19484 Filed 8-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-P
```
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 105

To amend the Act of September 30, 1961, to exclude professional baseball

from the antitrust exemption applicable to certain television contracts.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. BILIRAKIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Act of September 30, 1961, to exclude professional baseball from the antitrust exemption applicable

to certain television contracts.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Baseball Antitrust

5 Restoration Amendment of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS.

7 The Act of September 30, 1961 (15 U.S.C. 1291–

8 1294) is amended—

9 (1) in the first section by striking ‘‘baseball,’’

10 each place it appears,
2

•HR 105 IH

1 (2) in sections 4 and 6 by striking ‘‘baseball,’’

2 each place it appears, and

3 (3) by adding at the end the following:

4 ‘‘SEC. 7. The antitrust laws referred to in section 1

5 shall apply with respect to joint agreements of the kind

6 described in such section entered into by or among persons

7 engaging in or conducting the organized professional team

8 sport of baseball.’’.

9 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.

10 (a) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Except as provided in sub11 section (b), this Act and the amendments made by this

12 Act shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this

13 Act.

14 (b) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.—With respect

15 to joint agreements entered into before the date of the

16 enactment of this Act, the amendments made by section

17 2 shall not apply until the expiration of the 1-year period

18 beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
§ 1010.314 Structured transactions. No person shall for the purpose of evading the transactions in currency reporting requirements of this chapter with respect to such transaction: ( a ) Cause or attempt to cause a domestic financial institution to fail to file a report required under the transactions in currency reporting requirements of this chapter;
( b ) Cause or attempt to cause a domestic financial institution to file a report required under the transactions in currency reporting requirements of this chapter that contains a material omission or misstatement of fact; or
( c ) Structure (as that term is defined in § 1010.100(xx)) or assist in structuring, or attempt to structure or assist in structuring, any transaction with one or more domestic financial institutions.