alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 88 (Tuesday, May 7, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 26635]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-10795]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Paducah

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of Open Meeting: Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On April 29, 2013, the Department of Energy (DOE) published a 
notice of open meeting announcing a meeting on May 16, 2013 of the 
Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Paducah (78 FR 
25064). This document makes a correction to that notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rachel Blumenfeld, Deputy Designated 
Federal Officer, Department of Energy Paducah Site Office, Post Office 
Box 1410, MS-103, Paducah, Kentucky 42001, (270) 441-6806.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of April 29, 2013, in FR Doc. 2013-10035, 
on page 25064, please make the following correction:
    In that notice under DATES, second column, second paragraph, the 
meeting time has been changed. The new time is 5:30 p.m. instead of 
6:00 p.m.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on May 2, 2013.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-10795 Filed 5-6-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

October 4, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00280

- CR

Edgar Mario MORENO
, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 111th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas Trial Court No. 2017C RF

- 001147

- D2 Honorable Monica Z. Notzon, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

After we granted Appellant’s first

, second , and third motion s for extension of time to file the brief, A ppellant’s brief was due on September 27 , 2019

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(a). Before the t hr ice

- extended due date

, Appellant filed a fourth motion for a n extension of time to file the brief until Octo ber 7 , 2019.

Because of the unanticipated circumstances affecting counsel’s family, Appellant’s motion is GRANTED ; the brief is due on Octo ber 7
, 2019

. Any further motion for extension of time to fil e Appellant’s brief will be disfavored.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, JusticeIN WITNESS WHER EOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 4th day of October, 2019

.

___________________________________ LUZ ESTRADA
, Chief Deputy Clerk
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0597

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

CAVEY LITTLE ROSSBACH,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 2, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 24 2023

04/24/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0597
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         582,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    377,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,159,000
<PP&E>                                       2,520,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,956,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,799,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,575,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    11,308,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (12,119,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,799,000
<SALES>                                      2,101,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,101,000
<CGS>                                        1,899,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,899,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             130,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,277,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (971,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,306,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,306,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.19)
        

</TABLE>
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 112

To amend section 223 of the Communications Act of 1934 to prevent the

harassment by computer modem or other electronic device.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. MFUME introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Commerce

A BILL

To amend section 223 of the Communications Act of 1934

to prevent the harassment by computer modem or other

electronic device.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Electronic Anti-Stalk5 ing Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

7 Section 223(a) of the Communications Act of 1934

8 (47 U.S.C. 223(a)) is amended by adding at the end there9 of the following new sentence: ‘‘For purposes of subpara10 graphs (B), (C), and (D), the terms ‘telephone’ and ‘tele-
2

HR 112 IH

1 phone call’ include communications by means of computer

2 modem or any other two-way wire or radio telecommuni3 cations device.’’.

Æ
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JODY MAX GOODE,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 11

- 00282

- CR

Appeal from the

112 th District Court

of Upton County, Texas

(TC# 10

- 12

- U970

- DPO)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 9 TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2013.

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodrigu ez, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Blackhawk Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Todd J. James, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Todd J. James
--------------------------------
Todd J. James
Executive Vice President and CFO
November 12, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Blackhawk Bancorp, Inc. and will
be retained by Blackhawk Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
THIRD
                                  AMENDMENT TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


         This Third  Amendment (the  "Amendment") is made and entered into as of
the 29th day of September, 1998 by and between WorldPort Communications, Inc., a
Delaware  corporation  ("WorldPort"  or the  "Company")  and Mr.  Paul A.  Moore
("Executive") and amends that certain  Employment  Agreement dated as of January
1, 1998 between the Company and Executive (the "Employment Agreement").

         WHEREAS,  the parties executed an Amendment to Employment  Agreement as
of March 31, 1998 (the "First  Amendment")  which  amended  Section  6(f) of the
Employment  Agreement and executed a Second Amendment to Employment Agreement as
of April 1, 1998 (the "Second  Amendment")  which amended Section 6(a) and again
amended Section 6(f) of the Employment Agreement;

          WHEREAS, the parties desire to further amend a portion of Section 6(f)
of the Employment Agreement;

         NOW  THEREFORE,  for good and valuable  consideration,  the receipt and
sufficiency  of  which is  hereby  acknowledged,  the  parties  hereto  agree as
follows:

         1. The third sentence of Section 6(f) of the  Employment  Agreement (as
amended by the First  Amendment and the Second  Amendment) is hereby amended and
restated to read in its entirety as follows:

                  "The  promissory  note shall accrue interest at an annual rate
         of 9% and  mature on August 1,  2000,  at which  time all  payments  of
         principal and accrued interest shall be made."

         2. Except as otherwise amended hereby,  all terms and provisions of the
Employment  Agreement,  as amended  previously  shall continue in full force and
effect as stated therein. All capitalized terms used by not defined herein shall
have the meanings given in the Employment Agreement

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the parties have executed this Agreement as of the
day and year first above written.

                                               WORLDPORT COMMUNICATIONS, INC.


                                               By:
                                               Name:
                                               Title:



                                               Paul A. Moore
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU NE 12, 2015

NO. 03

- 13

- 00507

- CR

John Joe Garcia, Jr., Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF COMAL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment of conviction . Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of

conviction

. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, bot h in this Court and in the

court below.
#### Maria Cox et al., Respondents, v Ivelisse A. Nunez, Defendant, and Lawrence Cox, Appellant.

[805 NYS2d 604]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Lawrence Cox appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Burke, J.), dated April 5, 2004, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs to the respondents.

The plaintiffs were injured in a collision involving a vehicle operated by the defendant Lawrence Cox, in which they were passengers, and a vehicle operated by the defendant Ivelisse Nunez. The accident occurred at a four-way intersection controlled by stop signs on each corner. As Cox made a left turn into the intersection, Nunez’s vehicle collided with the driver’s side of his vehicle.

Cox moved for summary judgment based on evidence that he stopped at the stop sign before entering the intersection and that Nunez’s failure to stop was the sole proximate cause of the accident.

There can be more than one proximate cause of an accident *(see Forte v City of Albany,*279 NY 416, 422 [1939]; *Deshaies v Prudential Rochester Realty,*302 AD2d 999 [2003]). The fact that Nunez allegedly “ran” the stop sign would not preclude a finding that comparative negligence by Cox contributed to the accident *(see Romano v 202 Corp.,*305 AD2d 576, 577; *Bodner v Greenwald,*296 AD2d 564 [2002]; *Siegel v Sweeney,*266 AD2d 200 [1999]). A driver with the right-of-way has a duty to use reasonable care to avoid a collision *(id.).*

*428Accordingly, evidence that Nunez failed to stop at the stop sign would not preclude a finding that negligent conduct by Cox contributed to the accident *(see Romano v 202 Corp., supra; Bodner v Greenwald, supra).*As there are triable issues of fact as to whether Cox used reasonable care to avoid the collision *(see Romano v 202 Corp., supra; Siegel v Sweeney,*supra; Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1142 [a]), the Supreme Court properly denied Cox’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him. Florio, J.P., Krausman, Skelos and Covello, JJ., concur.
#### § 1023.311 Filing obligations.

Refer to § 1010.311 of this chapter for reports of transactions in currency filing obligations for brokers or dealers in securities.
ERBA DIAGNOSTICS, INC.


 


The Corporation will
furnish without charge to each stockholder who so requests a statement of the designations, powers, preferences and relative participating,
optional or other special rights of each class of stock or series thereof of the Corporation and the qualifications, limitations
or restrictions of such preferences and/or rights. Such request may be made to the Corporation or the Transfer Agent.


 


The following abbreviations,
when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according
to applicable laws or regulations:


 


	TEN COM	— as tenants in common	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT—________________Custodian____________
	 	 	                                                             (Cust)                                            (Minor)      
	TEN ENT	— as tenants by the entireties	                                         under Uniform Gifts to Minors
	 	 	 
	JT TEN	— as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common	
                                                 Act__________________________________

                                                 (State)



 


Additional abbreviations may also be used
though not in the above list.


 


For Value Received, ___________________
HEREBY SELL, ASSIGN AND TRANSFER UNTO


 


	PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER	 
	IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE	 
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 


 


______________________________________________________________________________________of
the shares represented by the within certificate and do hereby irrevocably constitute and


 


appoint______________________________________________________________________________________attorney
to transfer the said shares on the books of the within named corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.


 


dated_____________________________


 


	 	 
	NOTICE: 	THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST
    CORRESPOND     WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR
    ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE     WHATEVER.


 


SIGNATURE(S) GUARANTEED:


 


	 	 
	THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR
    INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE
    GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
www.gpo.gov

### §66. Duties of agency devolved on superintendent of Indian school

The Commissioner of Indian Affairs, with the approval of the Secretary of the Interior, may devolve the duties of Indian agency or part thereof upon the superintendent of the Indian school located at such agency or part thereof whenever in his judgment such superintendent can properly perform the duties of such agency.

The pay of any superintendent who performs agency duties in addition to those of his superintendency may be increased by the Commissioner of Indian Affairs, in his discretion, to an extent not exceeding $300 per annum.

(Mar. 1, 1907, ch. 2285, 34 Stat. 1020; Pub. L. 92–310, title II, §229(d), June 6, 1972, 86 Stat. 208.)

#### Amendments

1972—Pub. L. 92–310 struck out provisions which required the superintendent of the Indian school to give a bond as other Indian agents.

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
EX 10.2






Exhibit 10.2



July 30, 2012
Ascension Health
4600 Edmundson Road
St. Louis, Missouri 63134


		
	Attention:
	Robert Smith


JulieAnn Broyles


Re:  Notice Period for non-Renewal
Dear Bob and Julie:
Thank you for your continued effort and diligence regarding the completion of our renewal.
Paragraph 27.04 of the amended and restated Master Services Agreement by and between Ascension Health and Accretive Health dated December 13, 2007 (“MSA”) requires a party to provide 180 days notice prior to the end of the Master Term (as defined in the MSA), if such party does not intend to renew the MSA.  This letter confirms Accretive Health's agreement that Ascension Health may provide notice of its election not to renew the MSA to Accretive Health at any time on or before August 6, 2012, notwithstanding the 180 days requirement in paragraph 27.04.
Accordingly, if Ascension Health provides such notice, Accretive Health agrees that the MSA shall expire at the end of the Master Term, which is December 31, 2012.  Accretive Health further agrees that this letter does not limit or affect any rights that Ascension Health may have under the MSA.
Please let me know if you need anything further on this issue.
Best regards,
/s/ Greg Kazarian
Greg Kazarian
Accretive Health, Inc.
Senior Vice President
401 N Michigan Ave
Suite 2700
Chicago, IL 60611
312.324.7820
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1117 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1117

   To provide for the establishment of the Margaret Walker Alexander 
               National African-American Research Center.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 2, 1995

  Mr. Parker introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
          Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide for the establishment of the Margaret Walker Alexander 
               National African-American Research Center.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE MARGARET WALKER ALEXANDER NATIONAL 
              AFRICAN-AMERICAN RESEARCH CENTER.

    (a) Establishment.--In recognition of, and to commemorate, the 
literary contributions of Margaret Walker Alexander, the Secretary of 
Education shall make a grant to Jackson State University to establish 
the Margaret Walker Alexander National African-American Research Center 
(hereafter in this Act referred to as the ``Center''). The Center shall 
be located at Jackson State University in Jackson, Mississippi.
    (b) Requirements for Grant.--A grant may not be made under 
subsection (a) unless an application is made to the Secretary of 
Education at such time and in such manner as the Secretary may require. 
The application shall contain provisions designed to ensure that--
            (1) the Center will be located in the building known as 
        ``Ayer Hall'' on the campus of Jackson State University;
            (2) the building will serve as a national center for the 
        study, research, and teaching of African-American literature 
        and history and as a repository for papers and memorabilia 
        relating to the life of Margaret Walker Alexander and other 
        individuals noted for their work in African-American literature 
        and history; and
            (3) such other conditions as the Secretary requires.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    (a) Amount.--There are authorized to be appropriated not to exceed 
$8,000,000 for fiscal year 1996.
    (b) Availability of Funds.--Funds appropriated pursuant to this Act 
are authorized to remain available until expended.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 55.6165-1 Bonds where time to pay tax or deficiency has been extended.

If an extension of time for payment of tax or deficiency is granted under section 6161, the district director or the director of the service center may, if he deems it necessary, require a bond for the payment of the amount in respect of which the extension is granted in accordance with the terms of the extension. However, the bond shall not exceed double the amount with respect to which the extension is granted. For provisions relating to form of bonds, see the regulations under section 7101 contained in part 301 of this chapter (Regulations on Procedure and Administration).
**Exhibit 35.20**

OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE 

I, Karen Montbach, aManaging Director of Citibank, N.A. (the “Company”), hereby certify, with respect to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2016 (the “Agreement”), by and among Citigroup Commercial Mortgage SecuritiesInc., as depositor, Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association, as master servicer, LNR Partners, LLC, as special servicer, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as operating advisor, Citibank, N.A., as certificate administrator(the “Certificate Administrator”), and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, the following: 

1.     A review of the Company’s activities as Certificate Administrator during the reporting period endingDecember 31, 2016 and its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision. 

2.    To the bestof my knowledge, based on such review, as of and for the reporting period ending December 31, 2016, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period. 

This statement is given by the undersigned as an authorized officer of the Company and not in the undersigned’s individual capacity. 

Date:    February 27, 2017 

 

CGCMT 2016-P5
#### § 40.6302(a)-1 Voluntary payments of excise taxes by electronic funds transfer.

Any person may voluntarily remit by electronic funds transfer any payment of tax to which this part 40 applies. Such payment must be made in accordance with procedures prescribed by the Commissioner.

[T.D. 8828, 64 FR 37677, July 13, 1999]