alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 230 Agreed to House (ATH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 230

Providing for the sine die adjournment of the second session of the One 
                        Hundred Fourth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 28, 1996

  Mr. Armey submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for the sine die adjournment of the second session of the One 
                        Hundred Fourth Congress.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Monday, 
September 30, 1996, or on Tuesday, October 1, 1996, on a motion offered 
pursuant to this concurrent resolution by the majority leader, or his 
designee, it stand adjourned sine die, or until noon on the second day 
after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution, and that when the Senate adjourns on Monday, 
September 30, 1996, or Tuesday, October 1, 1996, on a motion offered 
pursuant to this concurrent resolution by the majority leader, or his 
designee, it stand adjourned sine die, or until noon on the second day 
after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1171

CHRISTOPHER G. HICKS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg,

District Judge. (1:06-cv-00222)

Submitted: September 19, 2007 Decided: October 10, 2007

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George L. Fitzgerald, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant.

Gretchen C.F. Shappert, United States Attorney, Sidney P.

Alexander, Assistant United States Attorney, Dino Trubiano, Special

Assistant United States Attorney, Robert J. Triba, SOCIAL SECURITY

ADMINISTRATION, Boston, Massachusetts, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Christopher G. Hicks appeals the district court’s order

dismissing this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Hicks v. Commissioner, No. 1:06-cv-00222 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 24,

2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 153 (Tuesday, August 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 40189]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19172]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. [thinsp]225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than August 26, 2009.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Steve Foley, Vice President) 
1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:
    1. Don Arthur Barnette, Jonesboro, Georiga; to acquire additional 
voting shares of CCB Financial Corporation, and thereby indirectly 
acquire additional voting shares of Community Capital Bank, both of 
Jonesboro, Georgia.
    2. Odric Gregory, individually, and as Chief Manager of Gregory 
Investments LLC, both of Gallatin, Tennessee; to acquire additional 
voting shares of Macon Banctrust, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire 
additional voting shares of Macon Bank and Trust Company, both of 
Lafayette, Tennessee.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (E. Ann Worthy, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Harold Ira Kane, Corpus Christi, Texas; to retain voting shares 
of Charter Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly retain voting 
shares of Charter Alliance Bank (de novo), both of Corpus Christi, 
Texas, Charter IBHC, Inc., Wilmington, Delaware, and Charter Bank, 
Corpus Christi, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 6, 
2009.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-19172 Filed 8-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
39607.

#### AAA AMUSEMENTS, INC. v. STATE OF GEORGIA.

Carlisle, Presiding Judge.

A petition to condemn a certain pinball machine which alleges that it is a device being operated in a public place by which the patron can, by inserting a nickel coin in a slot, secure three balls which can then be shot by a plunger; that if certain bumpers are struck by the balls, or if the balls go into certain holes on the board, the patron secures a score registered on the front of the machine; that if the score obtained by the patron is of a certain value free games register on the scoreboard of the machine and the patron thereby obtains from one to twenty free games, and that said machine constitutes a device for the purpose of maintaining and carrying on a lottery, scheme and device, as against a mere general demurrer, states sufficient facts to authorize the condemnation of such machine under the provisions of *Code Ann.*§ 26-6508 in that the described machine constitutes a scheme or device for the hazarding of money or a valuable thing, and the general demurrer to such petition was properly overruled. “Lottery” imports a scheme or device for the hazarding of money or other thing of value *by chance*and as against a mere general demurrer the allegation that the machine sought to be condemned constitutes a device for the purpose of maintaining a lottery sufficiently alleged that the element of chance was involved in the use of the machine and the petition was not generally demurrable for failure to expressly allege chance. *Jorman v. State,*54 Ga. App. 738, 740 (188 SE 925); *Barker v. State,*56 Ga. App. 705 (193 SE 605); *Thompson v.*Ledbetter, 74 Ga. App. 427 (39 SE2d 720); *Code*§ 26-6502. It matters not that the value of the thing hazarded is small or infinitesimal if in fact it does have some value. The device described in the petition in this case permits the patron, when he obtains the required score, to have *664the amusement of playing the game from one to twenty additional times without cost whereas the ordinary cost of playing the game and partaking of this amusement is five cents. What is given is certainly a thing of value and the machine was subject to condemnation under the statute. See *Brockett v. State,*33 Ga. App. 57 (125 SE 513); and *Jenner v. State,*173 Ga. 86 (159 SE 564).

Decided September 7, 1962

Rehearing denied October 1, 1962.

*Jean E. Johnson, Wendell C. Lindsay, Bloch, Hall, Groover & Hawkins,*for plaintiff in error.

*Ben F. Smith, Assistant Solicitor General,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Eberhardt and Russell, JJ., concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                              
<ARTICLE>                                          5
                                                    
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                       sep-30-1997
<CASH>                                                      3,315,738
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 508,715
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                    0
<PP&E>                                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             22,920,832
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                               0
<BONDS>                                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                                 19,218,166
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               22,920,832
<SALES>                                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            6,609,112
<CGS>                                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            4,396,164
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               43,337
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            259,436
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             1,910,175
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         1,910,175
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                1,910,175
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0
        
 

</TABLE>
#### § 31.6001-6 Notice by district director requiring returns, statements, or the keeping of records.

The district director may require any person, by notice served upon him, to make such returns, render such statements, or keep such specific records as will enable the district director to determine whether or not such person is liable for any of the taxes to which the regulations in this part have application.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                              5                        
<MULTIPLIER>                                       1,000
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            Feb-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                               Feb-23-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 May-31-1997
<CASH>                                            15,139
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    109,120
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                       39,197
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 196,233
<PP&E>                                         1,237,422
<DEPRECIATION>                                   644,496
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,009,989
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            154,914
<BONDS>                                          445,986
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                             438
<OTHER-SE>                                       362,078
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,009,989
<SALES>                                           19,241
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 245,171
<CGS>                                             11,328
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    168,043
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 6,676
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   32,200
<INCOME-TAX>                                      12,880
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               19,320
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                      19,320
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        .46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        .46
        

</TABLE>
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certainTrust and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 6, 2016, by and among DEUTSCHEMORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, AEGON USA REALTY ADVISORS, LLC, asSpecial Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, and WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agentand Custodian with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,Hudson Yards 2016-10HY Mortgage Trust (the "Agreement"). Capitalizedterms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in theAgreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.07 of thisAgreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Servicesdo hereby certify that:

 

1.       Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.       To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasexecuted this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells  Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
From: Nicholas Swanson/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Cortney

_Higgins@omb.eop.gov Date: 07/10/2012 02:13 PM Subject: Pulp and Paper (subpart S) notes

________________________________________ Cortney , Attached are some notes on the Pulp and Paper industry and our current status. Thank you.

------- Nicholas B. Swanson OAQPS/ SPPD/ Natural Resources Group U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 109 T. W. Alexander Drive (E140

- L) Research Triangle, NC 27711 Office: (919) 541

- 4080
§ 20.7520-4 Transitional rules. ( a ) *Reliance.* If the valuation date is after April 30, 1989, and before June 10, 1994, an executor can rely on Notice 89-24, 1989-1 C.B. 660, or Notice 89-60, 1989-1 C.B. 700 (See § 601.601(d)(2)(ii)( b ) of this chapter), in valuing the transferred interest.
( b ) *Effective date.* This section is effective as of May 1, 1989.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6078

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CHARLES EDWARD YOUNG,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. Margaret B. Seymour, District

Judge. (CR-97-128; CA-03-137-6-24)

Submitted: June 22, 2005 Decided: July 20, 2005

Before WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Edward Young, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*

To the extent that Young attempts to raise issues in his

informal brief that were not properly presented to the district

court, we note that he cannot raise them for the first time on

appeal. See Muth v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir.

1993).

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Charles Edward Young, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal

the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final

order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims

addressed by a district court absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable

jurists would find both that his constitutional claims are

debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the

district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v.

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S.

473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Young

has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.*

 We dispense
- 3 -

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
(logo) pwc

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

To the Board of Directors, PNCFinancial Services Group, Inc.:

 

We have examined management’sassertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance withRegulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Midland Loan Services, a division of PNCBank, National Association (“Midland” or the “Company”) complied with theservicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and ExchangeCommission's Regulation AB for all transactions serviced on the *Enterprise!*Loan Management System (the “Platform”), as of December 31, 2016 and for theyear then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(B),1122(d)(3)(i)(C), 1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii),1122(d)(3)(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are notapplicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to thePlatform. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with theservicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management'sassertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in thecircumstances. Our examination included testing of selected asset-backedtransactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selectedservicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether theCompany processed those selected transactions and performed those selectedactivities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedureswere limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed bythe Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were notdesigned to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurredprior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances oramounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by thisreport. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for ouropinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on theCompany’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assertionthat Midland complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria asof and for the year ended December 31, 2016 for the Platform is fairly stated,in all material respects.

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

February 17, 2017

 

 

*PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,1100 Walnut Street, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106*

*T: (816) 472 7921, F: (816)218 1890 www.pwc.com/us*