40000 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 152 / Monday, August 10, 2009 / Notices 

thence leaving the existing centerline, 

South 84 degrees 53 minutes 12 seconds 

East 65.00 feet to a point 65.00 feet right 

of station 32+50.00, said point being on 

the grantor’s western property line and 

the existing Right-of-Way of and the 

proposed Limited Access Right-of-Way 

of S.R. 741 and the western line of an 

existing channel easement owned by the 

State of Ohio, conveyed by M.F.# 78– 

638 E02, in the Montgomery County 

Recorder’s Office; 

thence leaving the existing Right-of-Way 

and the proposed Limited Access Rightof-Way and crossing the existing 

channel easement owned by the State of 

Ohio, South 84 degrees 53 minutes 12 

seconds East 15.00 feet to a point 

located 80.00 feet right of station 

32+50.00, said point being on the 

eastern line of an existing channel 

easement owned by the State of Ohio 

and the true point of beginning of the 

following described parcel: 

thence along the existing channel 

easement owned by the State of Ohio, 

North 34 degrees 33 minutes 31 seconds 

East 30.51 feet to an iron pin to be set 

95.00 feet right of station 32+76.57, said 

point being the intersection of the 

existing channel easement owned by the 

State of Ohio and the proposed channel 

easement; 

thence leaving the existing channel 

easement owned by the State of Ohio 

and along the proposed channel 

easement, South 05 degrees 06 minutes 

48 seconds West 136.57 feet to an iron 

pin to be set 95.00 feet right of station 

31+40.00; 

thence continuing along the proposed 

channel easement, North 84 degrees 53 

minutes 12 seconds West 15.07 feet to 

an iron pin to be set 79.93 feet right of 

station 31+40.00, said point being the 

intersection of the proposed channel 

easement and the eastern line of an 

existing channel easement owned by the 

State of Ohio; 

thence along the eastern line of an 

existing channel easement owned by the 

State of Ohio, North 05 degrees 08 

minutes 51 seconds East 110.00 feet to 

the point of beginning. 

The above described area is located 

within Montgomery County Auditor’s 

Permanent Parcel Numbers K45 02602 

0010 and K45 02602 0015. The parcel 

contains 0.042 acres, more or less, of 

which 0.038 acres is contained within 

K45 02602 0010, and 0.004 acres is 

contained within K45 02602 0015. 

Parcel 126 CH–2 

Situated in the State of Ohio, in the 

County of Montgomery, in the 

Township of Miami, in section 10, 

Town 2, Range 5 M.R.S. and being a part 

of a tract of land currently owned by 

The City of Dayton as currently 

described in the reference instrument 

M.F. #74–023 D06. 

Being a parcel of land lying on the 

right side of the centerline of existing 

S.R. 741 of Project MOT–75–0.75, made 

by the Ohio Department of 

Transportation in Book 207, Page 12A, 

B, & C, of the records of Montgomery 

County, and being located within the 

following described points in the 

boundary thereof: 

Beginning for reference at the 

proposed centerline monument located 

at the intersection of the MiamisburgSpringboro Pike (C.R. 166), station 

178+80.09 and S.R. 741, station 

39+56.49, said point having the 

following project adjusted coordinates: 

North 586268.7404; East 1481449.0814; 

thence along the existing centerline of 

S.R. 741, South 05 degrees 06 minutes 

48 seconds West 158.41 feet to a point 

located at station 37+98.08; 

thence leaving the existing centerline, 

South 84 degrees 53 minutes 12 seconds 

East 60.00 feet to an iron pin to be set 

60.00 feet right of station 37+98.08, said 

point being the intersection of the 

grantor’s western property line and the 

existing Limited Access Right-of-Way of 

S.R. 741 and proposed Limited Access 

Right-of-Way of Miamisburg-Springboro 

Pike (C.R. 166) and the western line of 

an existing channel easement owned by 

the State of Ohio, conveyed by M.F.# 

78–638 E02, in the Montgomery County 

Recorder’s Office; 

thence along the proposed Limited 

Access Right-of-Way, North 74 degrees 

08 minutes 39 seconds East 5.35 feet to 

an iron pin to be set 65.00 feet right of 

station 38+00.00, said point being the 

intersection of the eastern line of an 

existing channel easement owned by the 

State of Ohio and the proposed Limited 

Access Right-of-Way and the true point 

of beginning of the following described 

parcel: 

thence along proposed Limited Access 

Right-of-Way, North 74 degrees 08 

minutes 39 seconds East 68.01 feet to an 

iron pin to be set 128.51 feet right of 

station 38+24.34; 

thence continuing along proposed 

Limited Access Right-of-Way, South 88 

degrees 30 minutes 19 seconds East 

12.30 feet to an iron pin to be set 140.79 

feet right of station 38+25.12, said point 

being the intersection of the proposed 

Limited Access Right-of-Way and the 

proposed channel easement; 

thence leaving the proposed Limited 

Access Right-of-Way and along the 

proposed channel easement, South 05 

degrees 06 minutes 48 seconds West 

467.44 feet to an iron pin to be set 

140.79 feet right of station 33+57.68; 

thence continuing along the proposed 

channel easement, South 34 degrees 33 

minutes 31 seconds West 52.46 feet to 

an iron pin to be set 115.00 feet right of 

station 33+12.00, said point being the 

intersection of the proposed channel 

easement and the western line of an 

existing channel easement owned by the 

State of Ohio; 

thence along the existing channel 

easement owned by the State of Ohio, 

North 44 degrees 42 minutes 27 seconds 

West 58.90 feet to point located 70.00 

feet right of station 33+50.00; 

thence continuing along the existing 

channel easement owned by the State of 

Ohio, North 04 degrees 28 minutes 36 

seconds East 450.03 feet to the point of 

beginning. 

The above described area is located 

within Montgomery County Auditor’s 

Permanent Parcel Number K45 02602 

0015. The parcel contains 0.810 acres, 

more or less. 

Issued in Romulus, Michigan on July 17, 

2009. 

Matthew J. Thys, 

Manager, Detroit Airports District Office, 

FAA, Great Lakes Region. 

[FR Doc. E9–19030 Filed 8–7–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY 

Supplemental Environmental Impact 

Statement for a Single Nuclear Unit at 

the Bellefonte Site 

AGENCY: Tennessee Valley Authority. 

ACTION: Notice of Intent. 

SUMMARY: This notice of intent (NOI) is 

provided in accordance with the 

Council on Environmental Quality’s 

regulations (40 CFR parts 1500–1508) 

and Tennessee Valley Authority’s (TVA) 

procedures for implementing the 

National Environmental Policy Act 

(NEPA). TVA will prepare a 

Supplemental Environmental Impact 

Statement (SEIS) to update information 

in the 1974 Final Environmental 

Statement for Bellefonte Nuclear Plant 

Units 1 and 2 (1974 FES) and other 

pertinent environmental reviews, in 

order to address the potential 

environmental impacts associated with 

its proposal to operate a single nuclear 

generation unit at the Bellefonte Nuclear 

Plant (BLN) site located in Jackson 

County, Alabama. Currently, there are 

two partially constructed units at the 

BLN site. TVA may choose to complete 

and operate either one of these partially 

constructed units or construct and 


rmajette on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 152 / Monday, August 10, 2009 / Notices 40001 

operate one new technology unit. 

Operation of one nuclear unit capable of 

producing approximately 1,100 

megawatts (MW) of power would help 

address the need for additional base 

load generation in the TVA power 

service area; meet TVA’s goal to have at 

least 50 percent of its generation 

portfolio comprised of low or zero 

carbon-emitting sources by the year 

2020; and make beneficial use of 

existing assets at the BLN site. 

DATES: Comments on the draft SEIS will 

be invited from the public. It is 

anticipated that the draft SEIS will be 

available in fall 2009. A notice of 

availability of a draft SEIS will be 

published in the Federal Register, as 

well as announced in the local news 

media. 

ADDRESSES: Information about the SEIS 

may be obtained by contacting Ruth M. 

Horton, Senior NEPA Specialist, 

Tennessee Valley Authority, 400 West 

Summit Hill Drive, Mail Stop WT 11D, 

Knoxville, Tennessee 37902; by emailing to blnp@tva.gov; or by visiting 

the project Web site at http:// 

www.tva.gov/blnp. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

information about nuclear plant 

construction and operation, contact 

Andrea Sterdis, Nuclear Generation 

Development and Construction, 

Tennessee Valley Authority, 1101 

Market Street, Mail Stop LP 5A, 

Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402 (e-mail: 

alsterdis@tva.gov). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

TVA Power System 

TVA is an agency and instrumentality 

of the United States, established by an 

act of Congress in 1933, to foster the 

social and economic welfare of the 

people of the Tennessee Valley region 

and to promote the proper use and 

conservation of the region’s natural 

resources. One component of this 

mission is the generation, transmission, 

and sale of reliable and affordable 

electric energy. TVA operates the 

nation’s largest public power system, 

producing 4 percent of all electricity in 

the nation. TVA provides electricity to 

most of Tennessee and parts of Virginia, 

North Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, 

Mississippi, and Kentucky. It serves 

about 9 million people in this sevenstate region through 158 power 

distributors and 58 directly served large 

industries and federal facilities. The 

TVA Act requires the TVA power 

system to be self-supporting and 

operated on a nonprofit basis, and the 

TVA Act directs TVA to sell power at 

rates as low as are feasible. 

Dependable capacity on the TVA 

power system is about 37,000 MW. TVA 

generates most of this power with three 

nuclear plants, 11 coal-fired plants, nine 

combustion-turbine plants, a combinedcycle plant, 29 hydroelectric dams, a 

pumped-storage facility, a wind farm, a 

methane-gas cofiring facility, and 

several small renewable generating 

facilities. A portion of delivered power 

is obtained through long-term power 

purchase agreements. About 60 percent 

of TVA’s annual generation is from 

fossil fuels, predominantly coal; 30 

percent is from nuclear; and the 

remainder is from hydro and other 

renewable energy resources. TVA 

transmits electricity from these facilities 

over almost 16,000 miles of 

transmission lines. Like other utility 

systems, TVA has power interchange 

agreements with utilities surrounding 

the Tennessee Valley region and 

purchases and sells power on an 

economic basis almost daily. 

In the mid-1990s, TVA developed an 

Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) with 

extensive public involvement. This 

process was completed with publication 

of the Energy Vision 2020 Integrated 

Resource Plan and Final Environmental 

Impact Statement (IRP/FEIS) in 1995 

and the associated record of decision 

(ROD) in 1996. Based on the extensive 

evaluation, TVA decided to adopt a 

flexible portfolio of supply- and 

demand-side energy resource options to 

meet the growing demand for electricity 

in the region and achieve the goals of 

the TVA Act and other congressional 

directives. The portfolio of alternatives 

analyzed in the IRP/FEIS encompassed 

the current proposal to complete one 

nuclear unit at the BLN site. On June 15, 

2009, TVA announced its intent to 

conduct a new comprehensive study 

and environmental impact statement 

(EIS) entitled the Integrated Resource 

Plan. The proposal set out in this NOI 

also supports TVA’s goal of reducing its 

carbon footprint by 2020 and the need 

to make beneficial use of the existing 

infrastructure at the BLN site. 

Bellefonte Nuclear Plant 

The BLN site is located in northeast 

Alabama on 1,600 acres adjacent to the 

Tennessee River at Mile 392, near the 

cities of Hollywood and Scottsboro in 

Jackson County. The site includes two 

partially completed Babcock and Wilcox 

(B&W) pressurized water reactors 

known as BLN Units 1 and 2 (BLN 1&2), 

with a capacity of about 1,200 MW each. 

The then Atomic Energy Commission 

(now called the Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission or NRC) issued 

construction permits for BLN 1&2 on 

December 24, 1974. When TVA halted 

construction activities in 1988, in 

response to decreased power demand, 

BLN 1 was approximately 90 percent 

compete, and BLN 2 was approximately 

58 percent complete. 

TVA maintained the plant in deferred 

status until November 2005, when 

TVA’s Board of Directors approved the 

cancellation of BLN 1&2 in order to 

facilitate consideration of the BLN site 

for other possible uses. TVA submitted 

a Site Redress Plan to the NRC, along 

with a request for withdrawal of the 

construction permits. Under the redress 

plan, TVA maintained environmental 

permits and equipment associated with 

ongoing activities at BLN, including a 

training center and a substation. The 

construction permits were withdrawn 

by the NRC in September 2006. 

Subsequent asset recovery activities, 

along with more recent inspections of 

remaining equipment, resulted in BLN 

1&2 now being considered 

approximately 55 percent and 35 

percent complete, respectively. 

In 2006, TVA joined NuStart Energy 

Development LLC (NuStart), a 

consortium of 10 utility companies and 

two reactor vendors, to demonstrate the 

feasibility of processing a combined 

construction and operating license 

application (COLA) under 10 CFR Part 

52 and to complete the design 

engineering for the Westinghouse 

AP1000 advanced design for a 

pressurized water reactor. Preliminary 

designs for two new reactors at BLN, 

known as Units 3 and 4 (BLN 3&4), were 

developed as part of the application 

process. In choosing the BLN 3&4 

proposal as a COLA candidate, NuStart 

recognized that a substantial portion of 

the existing BLN 1&2 equipment and 

ancillary structures (e.g., cooling towers, 

intake structure, transmission 

switchyards) could be used to support 

such a new facility and that their use 

could reduce the cost of new 

construction. The COLA for BLN 3&4 

was submitted to the NRC in October 

2007 with TVA as the applicant of 

record. The COLA described the siting 

of two AP1000 reactors with an 

estimated thermal reactor power level of 

3,400 MW and a net electrical output of 

at least 1,100 MW from each reactor. 

Although TVA is the applicant of record 

for the NuStart demonstration, TVA has 

not decided to construct these advanced 

reactors at the BLN site. 

In August 2008, in response to 

changes in power generation economics 

since 2005 and the possible effects of 

constraints on the availability of the 

worldwide supply of components 

needed for new generation 

development, TVA requested 

reinstatement of the construction 


rmajette on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
40002 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 152 / Monday, August 10, 2009 / Notices 

permits for BLN 1&2. Reinstatement 

would allow TVA to return the units to 

deferred status; resume preservation and 

maintenance activities; and determine 

whether the completion of construction 

and operation of the units would be a 

viable option. The NRC reinstated 

TVA’s construction permits for BLN 1&2 

in terminated plant status in March 

2009. TVA is currently working to 

return the plant to deferred plant status. 

In addition to this current SEIS, TVA is 

conducting a Detailed Scoping, 

Estimating, and Planning (DSEP) study 

to further explore the feasibility of 

completing BLN 1 or BLN 2. 

In April 2009, NuStart transferred the 

initial licensing efforts and reference 

plant designation for the AP1000 from 

BLN 3&4 to Southern Nuclear’s Plant 

Vogtle. The transfer of the reference 

designation will help the NRC complete 

the reference plant licensing process 

sooner and help move the industry 

closer to new plant construction and 

commercial operation of the AP1000 

technology. Notwithstanding the 

transfer of the reference plant 

designation to Plant Vogtle, TVA is 

continuing to pursue a combined 

operating license for BLN 3&4 to 

preserve future base load generation 

options. 

Proposed Action and Alternatives 

To address the need for additional 

low or zero carbon-emitting base load 

generation in the 2017 to 2020 time 

frame, TVA proposes to supplement the 

1974 FES and other pertinent 

environmental reviews discussed in 

related documents identified below. The 

SEIS will evaluate the Action 

Alternatives of (1) completing and 

operating one partially completed B&W 

unit and (2) constructing and operating 

one new Westinghouse AP1000 unit. 

For either of these two Action 

Alternatives, use of the BLN site offers 

TVA the opportunity to maximize the 

value of existing assets, minimize 

environmental disturbance from new 

plant construction, and utilize licensing 

processes that are already underway. 

TVA will also consider the No Action 

Alternative. 

Under both Action Alternatives, the 

existing 161-kilovolt (kV) and 500-kV 

switchyards constructed on the BLN site 

would be refurbished and reenergized; 

four 500-kV transmission lines that 

terminate in the BLN switchyard would 

be reestablished; the right-of-way would 

be brought back to current TVA 

standards; the capacity of nine existing 

transmission lines would be increased; 

and two 161-kV transmission lines that 

supply a 161-kV switchyard to provide 

site power would be reestablished. TVA 

owns and operates the regional 

transmission system. 

No decision to build any new 

generating capacity at the BLN site has 

been made at this time. TVA is 

preparing this SEIS to supplement the 

original 1974 FES and update the 

information in related documents 

discussed below in order to inform 

decision makers and the public about 

the potential for environmental impacts 

associated with a decision to complete 

(or construct) and operate one unit at 

the BLN site. The draft SEIS will be 

made available for public comment. In 

making its final decision, the TVA 

Board will consider the assessment in 

this SEIS, including input provided by 

reviewing agencies and the public, as 

well as the information in the DSEP 

study and the cost and engineering 

studies for the AP1000. 

Summary of Relevant Environmental 

Reviews 

Several evaluations in the form of 

environmental reviews, studies, and 

white papers have been prepared for 

actions related to the construction and 

operation of a nuclear plant or 

alternative power generation source at 

the BLN site. As provided in the 

regulations (40 CFR Part 1502) for 

implementing NEPA, this SEIS will 

update, tier from, and incorporate by 

reference information contained in these 

documents about the BLN site and about 

nuclear plant construction and 

operation. 

The environmental consequences of 

constructing and operating BLN 1&2 

were addressed comprehensively in the 

1974 FES. In 1993, TVA issued a white 

paper in support of TVA’s 120-day 

notice to NRC for resumption of plant 

construction. The white paper reviewed 

10 aspects of TVA’s proposal in the 

1974 FES that had changed or were 

likely to change. TVA subsequently 

chose not to resume construction. 

Environmental conditions at the BLN 

site have been comprehensively 

reviewed three more times since 1993. 

The 1997 FEIS for the Bellefonte 

Conversion Project considered 

construction and operation of five types 

of fossil fuel generation, four of which 

involved plants with total electricity 

production capacity equivalent to BLN 

1&2 (approximately 2,400 MW). The 

proposed combustion turbine plant was 

not constructed. 

TVA participated as a cooperating 

agency with the Department of Energy 

(DOE) in preparing an EIS evaluating 

the production of tritium at one or more 

commercial light water reactors to 

ensure safe and reliable tritium supply 

for U.S. defense needs. The FEIS for the 

Production of Tritium in a Commercial 

Light Water Reactor addressed the 

completion and operation of BLN 1&2 

and updated the environmental record 

with regard to their operation. TVA 

adopted this FEIS in May 2000. DOE did 

not select BLN for tritium production, 

and TVA’s current proposal to complete 

additional generating capacity at BLN 

does not involve the production of 

tritium. The tritium production FEIS 

included pertinent information on spent 

nuclear fuel management, health and 

safety, decommissioning, as well as 

other topics. 

Most recently in 2007, as a part of the 

COLA for BLN 3&4, TVA, as a member 

of the NuStart consortium, prepared and 

submitted a comprehensive 

environmental report (ER) entitled 

Bellefonte Nuclear Plant Units 3&4, COL 

Application, Part 3, Environmental 

Report (COLA ER), for the construction 

and operation of two Westinghouse 

AP1000 nuclear plants at the BLN site. 

In addition to updating the description 

of environmental conditions at BLN and 

some operational aspects related to the 

cooling water system, this report fully 

describes the environmental effects of 

constructing and operating BLN 3&4. It 

also contains a discussion of alternative 

sites and energy resource options. 

In addition to documents directly 

related to the BLN site, two other TVA 

documents are relevant to this SEIS. 

First is the above-mentioned 1995 IRP/ 

FEIS. Deferral and completion of BLN 

1&2 were among the suite of alternatives 

evaluated in the IRP/FEIS, but not as 

part of the preferred alternative. This 

was because in the IRP’s economic 

analyses, TVA made conservative 

assumptions about the capacity factor 

(roughly how much a unit would be 

able to run) achieved by nuclear units. 

TVA’s nuclear units, consistent with 

U.S. nuclear industry performance, now 

routinely exceed this earlier assumed 

capacity factor, which will be taken into 

account in the current consideration of 

completing or constructing a single 

nuclear unit at the BLN site. 

In February 2004, TVA issued the 

Reservoir Operations Study 

Programmatic Environmental Impact 

Statement evaluating the potential 

environmental impacts of alternative 

ways for operating the agency’s 

reservoir system to produce overall 

greater public value for the people of the 

Tennessee Valley. This FEIS evaluated, 

among other things, the adequacy of the 

water supply necessary for reliable, 

efficient operation of TVA generating 

facilities within the operating limits of 

their National Pollutant Discharge 

Elimination System permits and other 

permits. A ROD for this FEIS was issued 


rmajette on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 152 / Monday, August 10, 2009 / Notices 40003 

in May 2004. TVA will incorporate 

assumptions for reservoir operations 

resulting from this FEIS review in the 

present evaluation. 

Need for Power 

The proposal under consideration by 

TVA is to meet the demand for 

additional base load capacity on the 

TVA system and maximize the use of 

existing assets by either completing one 

of the unfinished B&W units or by 

constructing one new AP1000 unit. The 

environmental impacts of other energy 

resource options were evaluated as part 

of TVA’s IRP/FEIS and in the COLA ER. 

This proposal also helps achieve TVA’s 

goal to have at least 50 percent of its 

generation portfolio comprised of low or 

zero carbon-emitting sources by 2020. 

Demand for energy in the TVA power 

service area is expected to grow at an 

average rate of approximately 1.1 

percent per year over the next 20 years. 

In addition, TVA continues to set new 

peaks for power demand on its system, 

including a new all-time winter peak. 

TVA’s current plan to meet growing 

demand includes a diversified 

expansion portfolio of market purchases 

(including up to 2,000 MW of renewable 

energy through a public request for 

proposal), intermediate and peaking gasfired capacity, continued modernization 

of TVA’s hydro plants to increase their 

power producing capacity, and 

expansion of TVA’s Generation Partners 

Program. Combined with these actions, 

TVA anticipates having to add new base 

load capacity to its system no later than 

the 2017–2020 time frame. As part of 

this SEIS, TVA will update the Need for 

Power analysis, as well as consider any 

new environmental information. 

Preliminary Identification of 

Environmental Issues 

This SEIS will update the analyses of 

potential environmental, cultural, 

recreational, and socioeconomic 

impacts resulting from completion (or 

construction), operation, and 

maintenance of one nuclear unit and of 

reenergizing and upgrading the existing 

transmission system. The impact 

analyses will include, but not 

necessarily be limited to, the potential 

impacts on water quality and use; 

vegetation; wildlife; aquatic ecology; 

endangered and threatened species; 

floodplains; wetlands; land use; 

recreational and managed areas; visual, 

archaeological, and historic resources; 

noise; socioeconomics; solid and 

hazardous waste; geology and 

seismology; meteorology, air quality, 

and climate change; uranium fuels cycle 

effects and radiological impacts; nuclear 

plant safety and security including 

design basis accidents; and severe 

accidents and intentional destructive 

acts. Information from TVA’s and NRC’s 

previous environmental reviews 

(described above) relevant to the current 

assessment will be incorporated by 

reference and summarized in the SEIS. 

Public and Agency Participation 

This SEIS is being prepared to update 

information and to inform decision 

makers and the public about the 

potential environmental impacts of 

completing and operating a single 

nuclear unit at the BLN site. The SEIS 

process also will provide the public an 

opportunity to comment on TVA’s 

analyses. Other federal, state, and local 

agencies and governmental entities will 

be asked to comment, including the U.S. 

Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Fish and 

Wildlife Service, the Alabama 

Department of Environmental 

Management, and Alabama Department 

of Conservation and Natural Resources. 

TVA will invite the review agencies 

and the public to submit written, verbal, 

e-mail, or online comments on the draft 

SEIS. It is anticipated that the draft SEIS 

will be released in fall 2009. Notice of 

availability of the draft SEIS will be 

published in the Federal Register, as 

well as announced in local news media. 

TVA expects to release a final SEIS in 

early spring 2010. 

Dated: August 4, 2009. 

Anda A. Ray, 

Senior Vice President & Environmental 

Executive, Office of Environment and 

Research, Tennessee Valley Authority. 

[FR Doc. E9–19045 Filed 8–7–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8120–08–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request 

August 3, 2009. 

The Department of Treasury will 

submit the following public information 

collection requirement(s) to OMB for 

review and clearance under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 

Public Law 104–13 on or after the date 

of publication of this notice. Copies of 

the submission(s) may be obtained by 

calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance 

Officer listed. Comments regarding this 

information collection should be 

addressed to the OMB reviewer listed 

and to the Treasury Department 

Clearance Officer, Department of the 

Treasury, Room 11000,1750 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20220. 

DATES: Written comments should be 

received on or before September 9, 2009 

to be assured of consideration. 

Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade 

Bureau (TTB) 

OMB Number: 1513–XXXX. 

Type of Review: New Information 

Collection Activity. 

Title: Certificate of Taxpaid Alcohol. 

Description: TTB F 5100.4 

consolidates taxes paid on distilled 

spirits used in the manufacture of 

nonbeverage products for exportation. 

The form is completed by TTB industry 

members to receive back $1 for each 

proof gallon of nonbeverage products 

exported. The form is certified by TTB 

as proof that the taxes have been paid 

and not previously received back. The 

completed form is sent to the Director 

of Customs and Border Patrol who 

processes it and returns the $1 per proof 

gallon. 

Respondents: Businesses or other forprofits. 

Estimated Total Burden Hours: 1,000 

hours. 

Clearance Officer: Frank Foote (202) 

927–9347, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax 

and Trade Bureau, Room 200 East, 1310 

G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005. 

OMB Reviewer: Shagufta Ahmed (202) 

395–7873, Office of Management and 

Budget, Room 10235, New Executive 

Office Building, Washington, DC 20503. 

Robert Dahl, 

Treasury PRA Clearance Officer. 

[FR Doc. E9–19074 Filed 8–7–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810–31–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Office of Foreign Assets Control 

Update to Identifying Information 

Associated With Two Entities 

Previously Designated Pursuant to 

Executive Order 13382 

AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets 

Control, Treasury. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Treasury Department’s 

Office of Foreign Assets Control 

(‘‘OFAC’’) has made changes to the 

identifying information associated with 

the following two entities, previously 

designated pursuant to Executive Order 

13382 of June 28, 2005, ‘‘Blocking 

Property of Weapons of Mass 

Destruction Proliferators and Their 

Supporters.’’ 

FIRST PERSIA EQUITY FUND (a.k.a. 

FIRST PERSIAN EQUITY FUND; 

a.k.a. FPEF), Rafi Alley, Vali Asr 

Avenue, Nader Alley, P.O. Box 


rmajette on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICES