alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

          The undersigned Chief Financial Officer of First Keystone Financial,
Inc. (the "Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.


                                        /s/ Rose M. DiMarco
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name: Rose M. DiMarco
                                        Title: Chief Financial Officer

Date: February 14, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to First Keystone Financial, Inc. and will
be retained by First Keystone Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 0.217 Nondiscrimination. ( a ) Employees shall not discriminate against or harass any other employee, applicant for employment, contractor, or person dealing with the Department on official business on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, age, disability, political affiliation, marital status, parental status, veterans status, or genetic information.
( b ) Supervisors shall not retaliate against an employee for complaining about suspected unlawful discrimination or harassment, seeking accommodation for a disability, or otherwise exercising their right to be free from unlawful discrimination.
( c ) An employee who engages in discriminatory or retaliatory conduct may be disciplined under these regulations, as well as other applicable laws. However, this section does not create any enforceable legal rights in any person.
I, Richard A. Altomare, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Universal
Express, Inc.:

      2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this quarterly report fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

      4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

      a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

      5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

      a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

      6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


                                          /s/ Richard A. Altomare
                                          -----------------------
                                          Richard A. Altomare, Chief
                                          Executive Officer and Chief
                                          Financial Officer

Dated: November 19, 2004
§ 31.0-1 Introduction. ( a ) *In general.* The regulations in this part relate to the employment taxes imposed by subtitle C (chapters 21 to 25, inclusive) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended. References in the regulations to the “Internal Revenue Code” or the “Code” are references to the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, unless otherwise indicated. References to the Federal Insurance Contributions Act, the Railroad Retirement Tax Act, and the Federal Unemployment Tax Act are references to chapters 21, 22, and 23, respectively, of the Code. References to sections of law are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code unless otherwise indicated. The regulations in this part also provide rules relating to the deposit of other taxes by electronic funds transfer.
( b ) *Division of regulations.* The regulations in this part are divided into 7 subparts. Subpart A contains provisions relating to general definitions and use of terms, the division and scope of the regulations in this part, and the extent to which the regulations in this part supersede prior regulations relating to employment taxes. Subpart B relates to the taxes under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act. Subpart C relates to the taxes under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act. Subpart D relates to the tax under the Federal Unemployment Tax Act. Subpart E relates to the collection of income tax at source on wages under chapter 24 of the Code. Subpart F relates to the provisions of chapter 25 of the Code which are applicable in respect of the taxes imposed by chapters 21 to 24, inclusive, of the Code. Subpart G relates to selected provisions of subtitle F of the Code, relating to procedure and administration, which have special application in respect of the taxes imposed by subtitle C of the Code. Inasmuch as these regulations constitute Part 31 of title 26 of the Code of Federal Regulations, each section of the regulations is preceded by a section symbol and 31 followed by a decimal point (§ 31.). Sections of law or references thereto are preceded by “Sec.” or the word “section”.
[T.D. 6516, 25 FR 13032, Dec. 20, 1960, as amended by T.D. 8723, 62 FR 37492, July 14, 1997]
# Úřední věstník C 29A/9. ú

| | ISSN 1725-5163 |
| --- | --- |
| Úřední věstník
  Evropské unie | C 29A |
| | |
| České vydání | Informace a oznámení | Svazek 509. února 2007 |

ISSN 1725-5163

Úřední věstník

Evropské unie

C 29A

České vydání

Informace a oznámení

Svazek 509. února 2007

---

| Oznámeníč. | Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Oznámení |
| | SPRÁVNÍ POSTUPY |
| | Evropská agentura pro chemické látky |
| 2007/C 029A/01 | Vyhlášení výběrového řízení na místo výkonného ředitele Evropské agentury pro chemické látky (ECHA) v Helsinkách (Třída AD 15) | 1 |

Oznámeníč.

Obsah

Strana

V   Oznámení

SPRÁVNÍ POSTUPY

Evropská agentura pro chemické látky

2007/C 029A/01

Vyhlášení výběrového řízení na místo výkonného ředitele Evropské agentury pro chemické látky (ECHA) v Helsinkách (Třída AD 15)

1

| CS | |
| --- | --- |

CS

---

V Oznámení

SPRÁVNÍ POSTUPY

Evropská agentura pro chemické látky

| 9.2.2007 | CS | Úřední věstník Evropské unie | CA 29/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2007

CS

Úřední věstník Evropské unie

CA 29/1

---

Vyhlášení výběrového řízení na místo výkonného ředitele Evropské agentury pro chemické látky (ECHA) v Helsinkách (Třída AD 15)

(2007/C 29 A/01)

Dne 1. června 2007 vstoupí v platnost nařízení REACH, které v Evropské unii vytvoří nový právní rámec pro chemické látky. Významnou součástí nařízení REACH je zřízení Evropské agentury pro chemické látky (ECHA) ve finských Helsinkách. Agentura ECHA bude řídit technické, vědecké a administrativní stránky nařízení REACH a bude zajišťovat jeho jednotné používání. Bude členským státům a orgánům EU poskytovat nejlepší možné vědecké a technické poradenství o chemických látkách.

Evropská komise hledá uchazeče o místo výkonného ředitele, kteří by byli schopni vést jednu z nejvýznamnějších regulačních agentur EU v klíčových prvních letech její existence a kteří by dokázali vyřešit vědecké, technické a organizační problémy související se zavedením složitého regulačního procesu do politicky citlivé oblasti, která má zásadní význam pro lidské zdraví, životní prostředí, konkurenceschopnost a inovaci. Uchazeči by měli mít dobré vedoucí zkušenosti v příslušných vědeckých nebo technických oblastech.

Výkonného ředitele jmenuje správní rada agentury na základě seznamu uchazečů, které vybere Evropská komise. V souladu s čl. 2 písm. a) Pracovního řádu ostatních zaměstnanců Evropských společenství bude jmenován jako dočasný zaměstnanec třídy AD 15 na dobu pěti let, která může být jednou prodloužena maximálně o pět let.

Oznámení o nabízeném místě a formulář přihlášky do výběrového řízení najdete na adresách

http://www.ec.europa.eu/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm

a

http://www.ec.europa.eu/enterprise/reach/prep_jobs_en.htm

Posledním dnem pro podávání přihlášek je 23. březen 2007.

---
§ 31.3401(a)(8)(C)-1 Remuneration for services performed in Puerto Rico by citizen of the United States. ( a ) Remuneration paid for services performed within Puerto Rico for an employer (other than the United States or any agency thereof) by a citizen of the United States does not constitute wages and hence is not subject to withholding, if it is reasonable to believe that during the entire calendar year the employee will be a bona fide resident of Puerto Rico. The reasonable belief contemplated by section 3401(a)(8)(C) may be based upon any evidence reasonably sufficient to induce such belief, even though such evidence may be insufficient upon closer examination by the district director or the courts finally to establish that the employee was a bona fide resident of Puerto Rico for the entire calendar year.
( b ) The employer may, in the absence of cause for a reasonable belief to the contrary, presume that an employee will be a bona fide resident of Puerto Rico during the entire calendar year. ( 1 ) Unless the employee is known by the employer to have maintained his abode at a place outside Puerto Rico at some time during the current or the preceding calendar year; or
( 2 ) In any case where the employee files with the employer a statement (containing a declaration under the penalties of perjury that such statement is true to the best of the employee's knowledge and belief) that such employee has at all times during the current calendar year been a bona fide resident of Puerto Rico and that he intends to remain a bona fide resident of Puerto Rico during the entire remaining portion of such current calendar year.
( c ) This section has no application to remuneration paid to a citizen of the United States for services performed in Puerto Rico as an employee of the United States or any agency thereof.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 90 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 90

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
                       protect the right to life.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 1995

    Mr. Dornan introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
                       protect the right to life.
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission by the Congress:

                              ``Article--
    ``Section 1. The paramount right to life is vested in each human 
being at fertilization.''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .


                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1


                   GTECH HOLDINGS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                         (Unaudited)
                                                                      Nine Months Ended
                                                                ------------------------------
                                                                November 26,      November 27,
                                                                    2005             2004
                                                                ------------      ------------
                                                                    (Dollars in thousands)
<S>                                                             <C>               <C>
Earnings:
   Income before income taxes                                   $    229,550      $    237,803
   Add:
     Interest on indebtedness                                         23,162            11,743
     Equity income, net of distributions                                (612)            1,071
     Minority losses                                                   2,287             2,178
     Portion of rents representative of the interest factor              944               986
     Amortization of capitalized interest                                596               502
                                                                ------------      ------------
       Earnings available for fixed charges                     $    255,927      $    254,283
                                                                ============      ============

Fixed charges:
     Interest on indebtedness                                         23,162            11,743
     Portion of rents representative of the interest factor              944               986
     Capitalized interest                                                 13               650
                                                                ------------      ------------
       Total fixed charges                                      $     24,119      $     13,379
                                                                ============      ============

         Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                            10.61             19.01
                                                                ============      ============
</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Andre Walker, Appellant.

[805 NYS2d 398]

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Berry, J.), rendered July 30, 2004, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that he violated a condition thereof, upon his admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

The defendant did not appeal from the original judgment convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree. Accordingly, on this appeal from the amended judgment, the defendant is jurisdictionally foreclosed from challenging the propriety of the original judgment *(see People v Oquendo,*286 AD2d 740 [2001]; *People v Augustin,*286 AD2d 442 [2001]; *589
      *People v Riddick,*269 AD2d 472 [2000]; *People v Moore,*261 AD2d 421 [1999]).

The defendant’s valid waiver of the right to appeal *(see People v Kemp,*94 NY2d 831, 833 [1999]; *People v Muniz,*91 NY2d 570, 575 [1998]) precludes review of his challenge to the amended judgment *(see People v Gorovoy,*309 AD2d 764 [2003]; *People v Bennett,*269 AD2d 401 [2000]). H. Miller, J.P., Crane, Krausman, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
133054 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 133054 COA: 273734 Jackson CC: 05-006863-FH WALTER JAMES KYES, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the December 7, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

s0416 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 24, 2007

Clerk
GRANT THORNTON LLP	

1100 Peachtree St. NE

Atlanta, GA 30309

D +1 404 330 2000

F +1 404 475 0107

|        |     |     |      |
|--------|-----|-----|------|
| D   +1 | 404 | 330 | 2000 |
| F   +1 | 404 | 475 | 0107 |

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors of BellOak, LLC

 

We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria (“Management’s Report”), that BellOak, LLC (the “Company” or “BellOak”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Items 1122(d)(3)(i)(A-B) and 1122(d)(4)(vii) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the Senior Trust Advisor, Trust Advisor, and Operating Advisor Services Platform (the “Platform”) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2023. The Platform consists of the asset-backed transactions and securities as defined by management in Appendix B of Management’s Report. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Platform based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Platform and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities constituting the Platform and evaluating whether the Company performed servicing activities related to those transactions and securities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the period covered by this report. Accordingly, our testing may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed transaction or security constituting the Platform. Further, our examination was not designed to detect material noncompliance that may have occurred prior to the period covered by this report and that may have affected the Company’s servicing activities during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria.

 

We are required to be independent and to meet our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with relevant ethical requirements relating to the engagement.

 

 

----

In our opinion, management’s assertion that BellOak, LLC complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2023, for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 

 

Atlanta, Georgia

February 19, 2024

 

----
EXHIBIT 10.2


IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN


_____________________________


2002 AMENDMENT


_____________________________


Iron Mountain Incorporated (the “Company”) hereby amends the Iron
Mountain Incorporated Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) as set
forth below.


*   *  
*   *   *


1.  Eligibility to Participate.  Section 4.1 of the Plan shall be amended,
effective February 1, 2002, to read in its entirety as follows:


4.1  Eligibility
to Participate.  Except as the
Committee in its discretion may otherwise determine, each management employee
and highly compensated employee of the Company or a Subsidiary who is exempt
from the minimum wage and overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act
of 1938, as amended, and whose base salary for the preceding year is at least
equal to the amount currently in effect under Section 414(q)(1)(B) of the Code
($85,000 for 2001) shall be eligible to participate in the Plan.


*   *   *  
*   *


2.  Further Amendments.  Except as hereinabove specifically amended,
all provisions of the Plan shall continue in full force and effect; provided,
however, that the Company hereby reserves the power from time to time to
further amend the Plan.


*   *   *  
*   *


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this 2002 Amendment to be
executed in its name and on its behalf this 28th day of January, 2002.


	
  

  	
  IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ C. Richard Reese

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
      C. Richard Reese