alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14 AND 15d-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 AND SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 I, Thomas M. Kelly certify that:1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of First Keystone Financial, Inc. (the
Registrant);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the
audit committee of Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date:  August 14, 2007
    /s/Thomas M. KellyThomas M. KellyPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of HQ Sustainable Maritime Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, JeanPierre Dallaire, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
SarbanesOxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 14, 2008



/s/ Jean-Pierre DallaireJean-Pierre DallairePrincipal Financial and Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>   5

<S>                                             <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                            OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                              DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                        177,686
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 632,096
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  182,400
<INVENTORY>                                                    98,849
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            2,851,766
<PP&E>                                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                126,071
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              5,414,992
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       4,769,036
<BONDS>                                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                       66,000
<OTHER-SE>                                                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                5,414,992
<SALES>                                                     1,395,557
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            1,395,557
<CGS>                                                         926,998
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 926,998
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            1,344,592
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              1,110
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              (877,143)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          (877,143)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 (877,143)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                     (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      (0)





</TABLE>
§ 1.6049(d)-5T Reporting by brokers of interest and original issue discount on and after January 1, 1986 (temporary). For purposes of § 1.6049-5 (c), relating to original issue discount treated as interest subject to reporting, on and after January 1, 1986, a payor who is a broker or middleman holding as a nominee— ( a ) A bank certificate of deposit (without regard to whether the broker or middleman sold the certificate of deposit to the owner), or
( b ) Any other original issue discount debt instrument that is specified by the Commissioner,
must determine whether that obligation is one that was issued at a discount and the amount of discount that is includible in the income of the owner. However, before January 1, 1987, reporting is required only with respect to certificates of deposit (or any such other obligations) held by a broker or middleman as a nominee on or after June 1, 1986, that were sold by the broker or middleman (whether for the broker's account or as an agent of the issuer) to the owner. The preceding two sentences do not apply to certificates of deposit (or any such other obligations) held on or after January 1, 1986, but disposed of before June 1, 1986; reporting requirements with respect to such certificates of deposit (or any other such obligations) shall be determined under the provisions of § 1.6049-5 (c) as in effect immediately prior to publication of this § 1.6049-5T. [T.D. 8109, 51 FR 45106, Dec. 17, 1986. Redesignated by T.D. 9658, 79 FR 12800, Mar. 6, 2014]
Calendar No. 203

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 91

RESOLUTION

To refer S. 745 entitled ‘‘A Bill for the Relief of

United States Court of Federal Claims.Hardwick, Inc.’’, to the Chief Judge of the

SEPTEMBER 20 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 7), 1993

Reported without amendment
III

Calendar No. 203

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 91

To refer S. 745 entitled ‘‘A Bill for the Relief of Hardwick, Inc.’’, to

the Chief Judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 2 (legislative day, MARCH 3), 1993

Mr. SIMON submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

SEPTEMBER 20 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 7), 1993

Reported by Mr. BIDEN, without amendment

RESOLUTION

To refer S. 745 entitled ‘‘A Bill for the Relief of Hardwick,

Inc.’’, to the Chief Judge of the United States Court

of Federal Claims.

1 Resolved, That the bill S. 745 entitled ‘‘A Bill for the

2 Relief of Hardwick, Inc.’’, now pending in the Senate, to3 gether with all accompanying papers, is referred to the

4 Chief Judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims.

5 The Chief Judge shall proceed with consideration of such

6 case in accordance with the provisions of sections 1492

7 and 2509 of title 28, United States Code (notwithstanding
2

•SRES 91 RS

1 any other appeal, statute, case law, or regulations, includ2 ing section 1500 of title 28, United States Code, that may

3 limit in any way the jurisdiction or authority of the court),

4 and report thereon to the Senate at the earliest practicable

5 date giving findings of fact and conclusions thereon as

6 shall be sufficient to inform the Congress of the nature

7 and character of the demand as a claim, legal or equitable

8 against the United States, and the amount, if any, legally

9 or equitably due to the claimants from the United States.
728 P.2d 469

#### In the Matter of Steven F. GROVER, III, an Attorney Admitted to Practice Before the Courts of the State of New Mexico.

No. 16712.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Nov. 19, 1986.

ORDER

This matter coming on for consideration by the Court upon Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board, and the Court having considered the matter and being sufficiently advised, Chief Justice Riordan, Senior Justice Sosa, Justice Federici, Justice Stowers and Justice Walters concurring;

On April 16, 1986, Attorney Steven F. Grover, III, did plead guilty to the crime of misappropriation by Bankruptcy Trustee and, thereafter, received a sentence of three year’s imprisonment and was ordered to make restitution in the amount of $40,-000.00, as well as to pay a penalty assessment of $50.00.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board are hereby adopted, Steven F. Grover, III having submitted a Conditional Admission and Consent to Discipline dated June 19, 1986 after consultation with his attorney, and the said Steven F. Grover, III is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in all Courts of the State of New Mexico, and costs are hereby assessed against Steven F. Grover, III in the amount of $25.50 to be paid to the Disciplinary Board on or before December 1, 1986.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is hereby authorized and directed to publish this Order in the *New Mexico Reports*and *News and Views.*
#### Sandro Farduchi, Plaintiff, v United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc., et al., Appellants, and Construction of New York, Inc., Respondent, et al., Defendants.

[804 NYS2d 786]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc., and Street Retail Forest Hills I, LLC, appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golar, J.), dated April 14, 2004, which denied their motion for summary judgment on their cross claims for common-law and contractual indemnification, including insurance and defense costs, insofar as asserted against the defendant Pepeo Construction of New York, Inc.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied summary judgment to United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc., and Street Retail Forest Hills I, LLC (hereinafter collectively the Owners), on their cross claims against the general contractor, Pepeo Construction of New York, Inc. (hereinafter Pepeo), because a triable issue of fact existed as to Pepco’s alleged negligence and that of its subcontractors and sub-subcontractors, and as to whether Pepeo exclusively supervised and controlled the work area where the accident occurred. Thus, even though the Owners’ liability was purely statutory and vicarious, conditional summary judgment for common-law indemnification would have been premature *(see Perri v Gilbert Johnson Enters., Ltd.,*14 AD3d 681, 685 [2005]; *Hernandez v Two E. End Ave. Apt. Corp.,*303 AD2d 556, 558 [2003]). Moreover, because the subject contract required indemnification only where there was negligence on the part of the contractor or its agents, summary judgment for contractual indemnification would also have been premature *(see Kader v City of N.Y., Hous. Preserv. & Dev.,*16 AD3d 461, 463 [2005]).

The plaintiffs contention that he is entitled to summary judgment on his cause of action alleging a violation of Labor Law § 241 (6) is not properly before this Court *(see Dunham v Hilco Constr. Co.,*89 NY2d 425 [1996]). Schmidt, J.P., S. Miller, Santucci and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 (the Form 10-Q), of the Company fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





|                  |  |     |  |                                                                
|----------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 3, 2016 |  | By: |  | /s/ Jochen E. Tilk                                             
|                  |  |     |  | Jochen E. Tilk                                                 
|                  |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer                          
|Date: May 3, 2016 |  | By: |  | /s/ Wayne R. Brownlee                                          
|                  |  |     |  | Wayne R. Brownlee                                              
|                  |  |     |  | Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K, Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly,
is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
#### § 47.5000D-0 Table of contents.

This section lists the table of contents for §§ 47.5000D-1 through 47.5000D-4.

## § 47.5000D-1 Introduction.

(a) In general.

(b) Applicability date.

## §§ 47.5000D-2—47.5000D-4 [Reserved]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 11 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 11

 Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the expression of self-
              determination by the people of Puerto Rico.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

 Mr. Serrano submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
referred to the Committee on International Relations and, in addition, 
    to the Committee on Resources, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the expression of self-
              determination by the people of Puerto Rico.

Whereas the people of Puerto Rico are natural-born citizens of the United States 
        but do not enjoy all of the individual rights and liberties accorded to 
        other American citizens under the United States Constitution;
Whereas the future status of Puerto Rico remains under discussion among 
        residents of the Island of Puerto Rico and among Puerto Ricans residing 
        in the 50 States of the United States; and
Whereas the Charter of the United Nations, a treaty to which the United States 
        is a signatory, expresses the right of self-determination, that is the 
        right of a people to decide for themselves the political status under 
        which they live: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) reaffirms the commitment of the people of the United 
        States to the principle of self-determination;
            (2) reasserts the principle, first articulated by the 
        Congress in its ratification of the Charter of the United 
        Nations, that with respect to territories whose peoples have 
        not yet attained a full measure of self-government, the 
        interests of the inhabitants of such territories are paramount; 
        and
            (3) endorses the right of the people of Puerto Rico to 
        political self-determination.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                                   As Adopted
                         Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Process Equipment, Inc., now known as
HQ Sustainable Maritime Industries, Inc. (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the
period  ended  October  31,  2003 as filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission on December 23, 2003 (the "Report"),  the undersigned  officer of the
Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

         1.       the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the  Company and will be  furnished  to the SEC or its staff
upon request.


 /s/ Lillian Wang
------------------------
Lillian Wang
Acting Chief Financial Officer
September 10, 2004



         This  Certification  of Acting  Chief  Financial  Officer  pursuant  to
Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 is not  "filed" for  purposes of
Section 18 of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 but is instead  furnished as
provided by the applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
#### § 509.106 Control of a United States enterprise by a Swiss enterprise.

In effect, Article IV of the convention provides that, if a Swiss enterprise by reason of its control of a United States enterprise imposes on the latter enterprise conditions different from those which would result from normal business relations between independent enterprises, the accounts between the enterprises shall be adjusted in order to ascertain the true taxable income of each enterprise. The purpose is to place the controlled United States enterprise on a tax parity with an uncontrolled United States enterprise by determining, according to the standard of an uncontrolled enterprise, the true taxable income from the property and business of the controlled enterprise. The basic objective of the article is that, if the accounting records do not truly reflect the taxable income from the property and business of the United States enterprise, the Commissioner shall intervene and, by making such distributions, apportionments, or allocations as he may deem necessary of gross income, deductions, credits, or allowances, or of any item or element affecting taxable income, between the United States enterprise and the Swiss enterprise by which it is controlled or directed, shall determine the true taxable income of the United States enterprise. The provisions of section 482 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, and the regulations thereunder, shall, insofar as applicable, be followed in the determination of the taxable income of the United States enterprise.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                        5
<LEGEND>               THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
                       INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 10Q DATED
                       JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
                       ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
                       STATEMENTS
<MULTIPLIER>                     1000

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                     JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                           247265
<SECURITIES>                     1063989
<RECEIVABLES>                    106690
<ALLOWANCES>                     4626
<INVENTORY>                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 1525552
<PP&E>                           179929
<DEPRECIATION>                   115592
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   2133180
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            197050
<BONDS>                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>            0
<PREFERRED>                      0
<COMMON>                         225
<OTHER-SE>                       1701073
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     2133180
<SALES>                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 254265
<CGS>                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    191438
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  74004
<INCOME-TAX>                     32200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              31544
<DISCONTINUED>                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                  0
<CHANGES>                        0
<NET-INCOME>                     31544
<EPS-BASIC>                    1.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                    1.40



</TABLE>
Appeal Dismissed and Opinion Filed September 13, 2012

In The 

## (!tnurt nfAppiats 3JiftI! Diztrict nf ixa at atIa No. 05-12-00698-CR DAVE OSCAR-RAMOGI JUMA, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 001-85018-2011



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before ChiefJustice Wright and Justices Bridges and Myers Appellant, who is representinghimself, has filed amotionto dismissthe appeal. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS thatthe be appeal DISMISSED andthis decisionbe certified below for observance. See TEx. R. App. P. 42.2(a). PER CURTAM Do Not Publish TEx. R. App. P. 47