alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

     The undersigned Chief Financial Officer of First Keystone Financial, Inc.
(the "Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.


                                        /s/ Rose M. DiMarco
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name: Rose M. DiMarco
                                        Title: Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 15, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to First Keystone Financial, Inc. and will
be retained by First Keystone Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 521.115 Credit against United States tax liability for Danish tax.

For the purpose of avoidance of double taxation, Article XV provides that, on the part of the United States, there shall be allowed against the United States income tax a credit for the amount of Danish taxes described in Article I of the convention imposed on income derived from sources within Denmark for taxable years beginning on and after January 1, 1948. Such credit, however, is subject to the limitations provided in section 131 of the Internal Revenue Code (relating to the credit for foreign taxes). See §§ 29.131-1 to 29.131-10 of Regulations 111 (26 CFR 1949 ed. Supps. 29.131-1 to 29.131-10) [and §§ 39.131(a) 1 to 39.131(j)-1 of Regulations 118 (26 CFR, Rev. 1953, Parts 1-79, and Supps.)].
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-26-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-27-1999
<CASH>                                           7,750
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  132,757
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     59,142
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               244,885
<PP&E>                                       1,193,454
<DEPRECIATION>                                 818,005
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 882,649
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          192,291
<BONDS>                                        385,900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           442
<OTHER-SE>                                     257,073
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   882,649
<SALES>                                        101,521
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               743,615
<CGS>                                           70,505
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  491,772
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,402
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                107,573
<INCOME-TAX>                                    44,105
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             63,468
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    63,468
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.73


</TABLE>
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 70

JOINT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity to esthe District of Columbia or its environs. tablish a memorial to Martin Luther King, Jr. in
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 70

JOINT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity to establish a

memorial to Martin Luther King, Jr. in the District

of Columbia or its environs.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HJ 70 EH

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH MEMORIAL.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity

3 is authorized to establish a memorial on Federal land in

4 the District of Columbia or its environs to honor Martin

5 Luther King, Jr.

6 (b) COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS FOR COMMEMO7 RATIVE WORKS.—The establishment with the Act entitled

8 ‘‘An Act to provide standards for placement of commemo9 rative works on certain Federal lands in the District of

10 Columbia and its environs, and for other purposes’’ ap11 proved November 14, 1986 (40 U.S.C. 1001, et seq.).

12 SEC. 2. PAYMENT OF EXPENSES.

13 The Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity shall be solely re14 sponsible for acceptance of contributions for, and payment

15 of the expenses of, the establishment of the memorial. No

16 Federal funds may be used to pay any expense of the es17 tablishment of the memorial.

18 SEC. 3. DEPOSIT OF EXCESS FUNDS.

19 If, upon payment of all expenses of the establishment

20 of the memorial (including the maintenance and preserva21 tion amount provided for in section 8(b) of the Act re22 ferred to in section 1(b), or upon expiration of the author23 ity for the memorial under section 10(b) of that Act, there

24 remains a balance of funds received for the establishment

25 of the memorial, the Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity shall

26 transmit the amount of the balance to the Secretary of
3

•HJ 70 EH

1 the Treasury for deposit in the account provided for in

2 section 8(b)(1) of that Act.

Passed the House of Representatives September 27,

1996.

Attest:

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 4 Introduced in House (IH)]

                                     

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 4

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
             allowing an item veto in appropriations bills.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

    Mr. Allard (for himself, Mr. Bachus, Mr. Barcia, Mr. Barrett of 
Nebraska, Mr. Bartlett of Maryland, Mr. Barton of Texas, Mr. Bereuter, 
   Mr. Burton of Indiana, Mr. Condit, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Cunningham, Mr. 
   Doolittle, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Emerson, Mr. Franks of New Jersey, Mr. 
  Gallegly, Mr. Gilchrest, Mr. Goodlatte, Mr. Hefley, Mr. Hunter, Mr. 
Knollenberg, Ms. Molinari, Mr. Oxley, Mr. Quillen, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. 
   Roth, Mr. Royce, Mr. Schaefer, Mr. Schiff, Mr. Sensenbrenner, Mr. 
Stump, Mr. Talent, Mr. Walsh, and Mr. Wilson) introduced the following 
 joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
             allowing an item veto in appropriations bills.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution, which shall be valid to all intents and 
purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures 
of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The President shall have the power to disapprove any 
appropriation or provision and approve any other appropriation or 
provision in the same appropriation bill. In such case he shall, in 
signing the bill, designate the appropriations and provisions 
disapproved, and shall return a copy of such appropriations and 
provisions, with his objections, to the House in which the bill shall 
have originated; and the same proceedings shall then be had as in the 
case of other bills disapproved by the President.
    ``Section 2. This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have 
been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures 
of three-fourths of the several States within seven years from the date 
of its submission.''.
                                 <all>
```
A jury found Applicant guilty of the felony offense of evading arrest or detention. 1

Subsequently, the trial court sentenced Applicant to thirty-five years’ confinement. The First

Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction but reversed and remanded for a new trial on

punishment. See Crawford v. State, No. 01-05-00292-CR (Tex. App.– Houston [1st Dist.] April

6, 2006, no pet.). The trial court conducted the new punishment hearing without a jury. The

Applicant was sentenced to eighteen years’ confinement. 

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,444

EX PARTE JOSEPH ANTHONY CRAWFORD, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 994680 IN THE 185th DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of evading arrest

and sentenced to eighteen years’ imprisonment. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his 1
2

conviction. Crawford v. State, No. 14-06-00818-CR (Tex. App.–Houston [14 Dist.], delivered

th

September 13, 2007, pet. ref’d). 

Applicant contends that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because she failed

to lodge a timely objection in order to preserve Applicant’s right to have a jury assess punishment

after remand from the intermediate appellate court.

The trial court, based upon the record and an affidavit filed by counsel, has determined that

the Applicant was denied his right to have a jury assess punishment after remand due to counsel’s

failure to timely object. We find, therefore, that the Applicant is entitled to a new punishment

hearing in the judgment of conviction in Case No. 994680 from the 185th Judicial District Court of

Harris County, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the sheriff of Harris County so that a

new punishment hearing may be held.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: November 10, 2010

Do Not Publish
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

I, Craig W. Packer, Chief Executive Officer of Owl Rock Capital Corporation II, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Owl Rock Capital Corporation II (the “registrant”) for the year ended December 31, 2017; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report. 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

| Date: March 2, 2018 |   | By:    | /s/ Craig W. Packer |
|---------------------|--------|--------|--------------------------|
|                |   |   | Craig W. Packer          |
|                |   |   | Chief Executive Officer  |
#### § 31.3402(h)(2)-1 Withholding on basis of annualized wages.

An employer may determine the amount of tax to be deducted and withheld upon a payment of wages to an employee by taking the following steps:

*Step 1.* Multiply the amount of the employee's wages for the payroll period by the number of such periods in the calendar year.

*Step 2.* Determine the amount of tax which would be required to be deducted and withheld upon the amount determined in Step 1 if that amount constituted the actual wages for the calendar year and the payroll period of the employee were an annual payroll period.

*Step 3.* Divide the amount of tax determined in Step 2 by the number of periods by which the employee's wages were multiplied in Step 1.

# Example.

On July 1, 1970, A, a single person who is on a weekly payroll period and claims one exemption, receives wages of $100 from X Co., his employer. X Co. multiplies the weekly wage of $100 by 52 weeks to determine an annual wage of $5,200. It then subtracts $650 for A's withholding exemption and arrives at a balance of $4,550. The applicable table in section 3402(a) for annual payroll periods indicates that the amount of tax to be withheld thereon is $376 plus $314.50 (17 percent of excess over $2,700), or a total of $690.50. The annual tax of $690.50, when divided by 52 to arrive at the portion thereof attributable to the weekly payroll period, equals $13.28. X Co. may, if it chooses, withhold $13.28 rather than the amount specified in section 3402 (a) or (c) for a weekly payroll period.

[T.D. 7053, 35 FR 11627, July 21, 1970]
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 6 (Friday, January 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 978]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-193]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed the Week Ending December 
6, 2008

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the Sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation 
Act, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1382 and 1384) and procedures governing 
proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 
days after the filing of the application.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2008-0375.
    Date Filed: December 3, 2008.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: Mail Vote 578--Resolution 010g, TC23 Middle East-TC3, 
Special Passenger Amending Resolution (Memo 0400).
    Intended Effective Date: 1 April 2009.

Barbara J. Hairston,
Supervisory Dockets Officer, Alternate Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. E9-193 Filed 1-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
Stock Certificate


    Exhibit 4.1

    

      NOT
        VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED BY TRANSFER AGENT. INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS
        OF THE
        STATE OF DELAWARE.

      


      Number
        Fluid Media Networks, Inc. Shares AUTHORIZED COMMON STOCK: 100,000,000 SHARES
        PAR VALUE: $.0001 SHARES CUSIP NO. xxxxxx xx xx

      


      This
        Certifies that

      


      Is
        The Record Holder Of 

      Shares
        of FLUID MEDIA NETWORKS, INC. Common Stock transferable on the books of the
        Corporation by the holder hereof, in person or by duly authorized attorney,
        upon
        surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not
        valid
        until countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar.
        Witness the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures
        of
        its duly authorized officers. Dated: /s/ Michael D. Raeford, Jr. Secretary
        /s/
        Justin Becket President
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

# DATES:

Written comments should be received on or before September 9, 2009 to be assured of consideration.

## Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB)

*OMB Number:*                     1513-XXXX.                

*Type of Review:*                     New Information Collection Activity.                

*Title:*                     Certificate of Taxpaid Alcohol.                

*Description:*                     TTB F 5100.4 consolidates taxes paid on distilled spirits used in the manufacture of nonbeverage products for exportation. The form is completed by TTB industry members to receive back $1 for each proof gallon of nonbeverage products exported. The form is certified by TTB as proof that the taxes have been paid and not previously received back. The completed form is sent to the Director of Customs and Border Patrol who processes it and returns the $1 per proof gallon.                

*Respondents:*                     Businesses or other for-profits.                

*Estimated Total Burden Hours:*                     1,000 hours.                

*Clearance Officer:*                     Frank Foote (202) 927-9347, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Room 200 East, 1310 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005.                

*OMB Reviewer:*                     Shagufta Ahmed (202) 395-7873, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.                

Robert Dahl,

Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. E9-19074 Filed 8-7-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-31-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ronnie Slaughter, Appellant.

[805 NYS2d 615]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldberg, J.), rendered May 25, 2004, convicting him of assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, his absence from the *Ventimiglia*hearing (see *People v Ventimiglia,*52 NY2d 350 [1981]) does not warrant reversal. The People sought to introduce evidence that the complaining witness had seen the defendant selling drugs on many occasions. The Supreme Court ruled that the witness could not testify that he had observed the defendant selling drugs, but that he could testify he had seen the defendant hundreds of times outside his window, that the defendant had been making noise with a group of friends, and that the witness had asked him to move on.

The first part of the ruling was decided wholly in the defendant’s favor *(see People v Favor,*82 NY2d 254, 268 [1993]) and thus, the defendant’s presence would not have contributed to the advancing of his case *(see People v Dokes,*79 NY2d 656, 660 [1992]; *People v Tellier,*232 AD2d 509 [1996]; *People v Baum,*222 AD2d 444 [1995]). The second part of the ruling involved a purely legal question of whether the witness’ prior observations of the defendant could be admitted on the issue of *503identity *(see People v Dokes, supra*at 660). Further, contrary to the defendant’s contention, his conduct in making noise did not rise to the level of disorderly conduct *(see*Penal Law § 240.20 [2]; *People v Bakolas,*59 NY2d 51, 55 [1983]; *People v Munafo,*50 NY2d 326, 331 [1980]) or otherwise constitute a bad act. Since the prospective use of prior bad acts of the defendant was not at issue during that portion of the hearing, the defendant’s presence was not required *(cf. People v Spotford,*85 NY2d 593, 597 [1995]). Schmidt, J.P., S. Miller, Santucci and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
June 30, 2015

Mr. Joseph Capone

Sky Has No Limits Productions

Webier Consulting

22 River Stres Suite 10

Braintree, MA 02184

Dear Mr. Capone:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your March 26, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-0767), 

but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not 

comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any 

further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure