alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by T.D. 9359, 72 FR 54544, Sept. 26, 2007.

§ 10.31 Negotiation of taxpayer checks. ( a ) A practitioner may not endorse or otherwise negotiate any check (including directing or accepting payment by any means, electronic or otherwise, into an account owned or controlled by the practitioner or any firm or other entity with whom the practitioner is associated) issued to a client by the government in respect of a Federal tax liability.
( b ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section is applicable beginning June 12, 2014.
[T.D. 9668, 79 FR 33693, June 12, 2014]
#### § 20.6314-1 Duplicate receipts for payment of estate taxes.

The internal revenue officer with whom the estate tax return is filed will, upon request, give to the person paying the tax duplicate receipts, either of which will be sufficient evidence of such payment and entitle the executor to be credited with the amount by any court having jurisdiction to audit or settle his accounts.

[T.D. 7238, 37 FR 28724, Dec. 29, 1972]
www.gpo.gov

### §288f–4. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources; extension of privileges, exemptions, and immunities

The International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources shall be considered to be an international organization for the purposes of this subchapter and may be extended the provisions of this subchapter in the same manner, to the same extent, and subject to the same conditions, as such provisions may be extended to a public international organization in which the United States participates pursuant to any treaty or under the authority of any Act of Congress authorizing such participation or making an appropriation for such participation.

(Dec. 29, 1945, ch. 652, title I, §14, as added Pub. L. 103–236, title IV, §426, Apr. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 458.)
(logo) pwc

  

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

To the Board of Directors, PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.:

 

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association (“Midland” or the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for all transactions serviced on the *Enterprise!*LoanManagement System (the “Platform”), as of December31, 2015 and for the year then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C), 1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Companyhas determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform.Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testingof selected servicingactivities related to the Platform, and determining whetherthe Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management's assertion that Midland complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 for the Platformis fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

February 25, 2016

 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 1100 Walnut Street, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106 

*T: (816) 472 7921, F: (816) 218 1890 www.pwc.com/us*
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Fl  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2016, byand among CREDIT SUISSE COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP., as Depositor,WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, TORCHLIGHT LOANSERVICES, LLC, as Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asCertificate Administrator, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trusteeand PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and AssetRepresentations Reviewer with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,Series 2016-NXSR (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein nototherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial MortgageServices do hereby certify that:

 

1.  A review of theactivities of the Master Servicer during the period from December 1, 2016through December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performanceper the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2.  To the best ofmy knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all ofits obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

                                                                                               

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President                       

Wells Fargo Bank 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
(Hamilton County Common Pleas.)

#### JOHN LACKER v. CHARLES EWALD

An infant is responsible for his own torts, and a father can not be held for the independent wrong of its child, but the father is liable if he was in any way connected with the infant’s doing wrong, either actively or passively.

SPIEGEL, J.

The demurrer must be sustained. The general rule is that an infant is responsible for his own torts, and that a father can not be held for the independent wrong of his child, but the father is liable if he was in any way connected with the infant’s wrongdoing, either actively or passively.

In this case the petition charges the infant with wilfully and maliciously shooting and killing a taxed and licensed dog, the gun having been carelessly and negligently left exposed by the father, by reason of which the infant, without any participation of the father, got hold of the gun.

Negligence is defined as follows by Shearman and Radfield: “Negligence constituting a cause of oivil action is such an omission by a responsible person, to use that degree of care, diligence and skill, which it was his legal duty to use for the protection of other person from injury as, in a natural and continuous sequence causes unintended damage to the latter.”

Was the exposure of the gun such a natural and continuous sequence, uninterruptedly connecting the breach of, duty with the damage, as cause and effect? I do not think so, and the demurrer must be sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           3,284
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   65,665
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     69,813
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               147,950
<PP&E>                                          49,305
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 286,577
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           78,792
<BONDS>                                        325,625
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,838
<OTHER-SE>                                   (128,931)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   286,577
<SALES>                                         87,392
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                87,392
<CGS>                                           55,085
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,218
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,469)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,068
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,490
<INCOME-TAX>                                       210
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,280
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,280
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

No. DA 23-0449 

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

vs. 

AMANDA SHARYCE WALTON, 

Defendant and Appellant. 

FILE 

DEC 21 2023 

Bowen Grewswood 

Clerk of Supreme Court 

Stata of Montana 

GRANT 

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until January 26, 2024, to 

prepare, file, and serve the Appellant's opening brief. 

12/21/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0449
# L_2021186EN.01003201.xml

| 27.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 186/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 186/32

---

Corrigendum to to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/238 of 8 February 2019 amending Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 to classify the substance ovotransferrin as regards its maximum residue limit

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 39 of 11 February 2019
  )

On page 6, in the annex, in the amendment to Table 1 of the Annex to Regulation (EU) No 37/2010:

for:

‘Not for use in animals from which eggs are produced’,

read:

‘Not for use in animals from which eggs are produced for human consumption’.

---
# !LED DEC 02 nu Emma BROV414 OF UPREME COufri

CLERK IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
No. 85664 CHARLES N. BELSSNER, I, Appellant, vs. SIERRA COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT, Res•ondent.

ORDERDISMISSINGAPPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from an "Order Re: Affidavit Seeking Disqualification of Judge." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Jerry A. Wiese, Judge.

Review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals ajurisdictional defect. Specifically, theorderdesignated in the notice of appeal is not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b). This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013). No statute or court rule provides for an appeal from an order denyingdisqualification ofajudge. See Towbin Dodge, LLC v. Dist. Ct., 121 Nev. 5, 112 P. 3d 1063 (2005) (noting that a
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 

# zwrit petition is the appropriate vehicle for challenging judicial

disqualification rulings).

This court lacksjurisdiction and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.1

Cadish

Sr. J.

cc: Hon. JerryA. Wiese, ChiefJudge Charles N. Belssner Hutchison & Steffen, LLC/LasVegas Eighth District Court Clerk

1The Honorable Mark Gibbons, Senior Justice, participated in this matter under a general order ofassignment.
2
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 154 (Wednesday, August 12, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 40605]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19328]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel, Long-term Outcomes of Delirium.
    Date: October 23, 2009.
    Time: 12 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892. (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Jeannette L. Johnson, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, National Institutes on Aging, National Institutes of 
Health, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-
402-7705. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a9e3e6e1e7fae6e7e390e9e7e0e887e7e0e187eee6ff"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5d171215130e121317641d13141c73131415731a120b">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel, Nursing Home Research.
    Date: October 27, 2009.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892. (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Jeannette L. Johnson, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, 
7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892. 301-402-
7705. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a0eaefe8eef3efeeea99e0eee9e18eeee9e88ee7eff6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="206a6f686e736f6e6a19606e69610e6e69680e676f76">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 6, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-19328 Filed 8-11-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
39946 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 152 / Monday, August 10, 2009 / Notices 

[FR Doc. E9–18966 Filed 8–7–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal Nos. 09–24] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601– 

3740. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittals 09–24 

with attached transmittal and policy 

justification. 

Dated: July 28, 2009. 

Patricia L. Toppings, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, 

Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 


rmajette on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICESEN10AU09.015</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 152 / Monday, August 10, 2009 / Notices 39947 


rmajette on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICESEN10AU09.011</GPH>
39948 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 152 / Monday, August 10, 2009 / Notices 

[FR Doc. E9–18964 Filed 8–7–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal Nos. 09–29] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601– 

3740. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittals 09–29 

with attached transmittal and policy 

justification. 

Dated: July 28, 2009. 

Patricia L. Toppings, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, 

Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 


rmajette on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICESEN10AU09.012</GPH>
# Euroopa Liidu C 3/2007

| | ISSN 1725-5171 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopa Liidu
  Teataja | C 3 |
| | |
| Eestikeelne väljaanne | Teave ja teatised | 50. köide6. jaanuar 2007 |

ISSN 1725-5171

Euroopa Liidu

Teataja

C 3

Eestikeelne väljaanne

Teave ja teatised

50. köide6. jaanuar 2007

---

| Teatis nr | Sisukord | Lehekülg |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Teave |
| | TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT JA ORGANITELT |
| | Komisjon |
| 2007/C 003/01 | Euro vahetuskurss | 1 |

Teatis nr

Sisukord

Lehekülg

IV   Teave

TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT JA ORGANITELT

Komisjon

2007/C 003/01

Euro vahetuskurss

1

| ET | |
| --- | --- |

ET

---

IV Teave

TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT JA ORGANITELT

Komisjon

| 6.1.2007 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | C 3/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.1.2007

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

C 3/1

---

Euro vahetuskurss (1)

5. jaanuar 2007

(2007/C 3/01)

1 euro=

| | Valuuta | Kurss |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | USA dollar | 1,3084 |
| JPY | Jaapani jeen | 154,55 |
| DKK | Taani kroon | 7,4532 |
| GBP | Inglise nael | 0,67470 |
| SEK | Rootsi kroon | 9,0726 |
| CHF | Šveitsi frank | 1,6097 |
| ISK | Islandi kroon | 92,14 |
| NOK | Norra kroon | 8,2830 |
| BGN | Bulgaaria lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Küprose nael | 0,5783 |
| CZK | Tšehhi kroon | 27,635 |
| EEK | Eesti kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Ungari forint | 253,63 |
| LTL | Leedu litt | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Läti latt | 0,6979 |
| MTL | Malta liir | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Poola zlott | 3,8731 |
| RON | Rumeenia leu | 3,3877 |
| SKK | Slovakkia kroon | 34,425 |
| TRY | Türgi liir | 1,8762 |
| AUD | Austraalia dollar | 1,6697 |
| CAD | Kanada dollar | 1,5374 |
| HKD | Hong Kongi dollar | 10,1914 |
| NZD | Uus-Meremaa dollar | 1,8885 |
| SGD | Singapuri dollar | 2,0084 |
| KRW | Korea won | 1 222,57 |
| ZAR | Lõuna-Aafrika rand | 9,3518 |
| CNY | Hiina jüaan | 10,2117 |
| HRK | Horvaatia kuna | 7,3710 |
| IDR | Indoneesia ruupia | 11 791,96 |
| MYR | Malaisia ringit | 4,5958 |
| PHP | Filipiini peeso | 63,915 |
| RUB | Vene rubla | 34,5230 |
| THB | Tai baht | 46,841 |

Valuuta

Kurss

USD

USA dollar

1,3084

JPY

Jaapani jeen

154,55

DKK

Taani kroon

7,4532

GBP

Inglise nael

0,67470

SEK

Rootsi kroon

9,0726

CHF

Šveitsi frank

1,6097

ISK

Islandi kroon

92,14

NOK

Norra kroon

8,2830

BGN

Bulgaaria lev

1,9558

CYP

Küprose nael

0,5783

CZK

Tšehhi kroon

27,635

EEK

Eesti kroon

15,6466

HUF

Ungari forint

253,63

LTL

Leedu litt

3,4528

LVL

Läti latt

0,6979

MTL

Malta liir

0,4293

PLN

Poola zlott

3,8731

RON

Rumeenia leu

3,3877

SKK

Slovakkia kroon

34,425

TRY

Türgi liir

1,8762

AUD

Austraalia dollar

1,6697

CAD

Kanada dollar

1,5374

HKD

Hong Kongi dollar

10,1914

NZD

Uus-Meremaa dollar

1,8885

SGD

Singapuri dollar

2,0084

KRW

Korea won

1 222,57

ZAR

Lõuna-Aafrika rand

9,3518

CNY

Hiina jüaan

10,2117

HRK

Horvaatia kuna

7,3710

IDR

Indoneesia ruupia

11 791,96

MYR

Malaisia ringit

4,5958

PHP

Filipiini peeso

63,915

RUB

Vene rubla

34,5230

THB

Tai baht

46,841

---

(1)

Allikas: EKP avaldatud viitekurss.

---
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC
Chandler Air Service, COMPLAINANT City ofChandler, AZ RESPONDENT. FAADocketNo.l6-l3-05

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME
This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based onthe abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance withFAA Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted AirportEnforcementProceedings, 14 CFR, Part 16. Pursuantto 14 CFR Part 16, subpart B, the date bywhichthe Director's Determination will be issued inthis matter is hereby extended to July 30,2015. An extension oftime is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this case.



### R~dall S. Fiertz ' Director, Airport Compliance

and Management Analysis 

## :fat-.C 

# 2_, 1 

### 20/'r. DateCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that onJune 26, 2015, I caused to be placed inthe United States mail (first class mail, postage paid) a true copy ofthe Notice ofExtension ofTime to July 30, 2015, for FAA Docket 16-13-08 addressed to: Timothy I. McCulloch Gordon & Rees LLP 111 W. Momoe Street, Suite 1600 Phoenix, AZ 85003 W. Eric Pilsk Daoiel S. Reimer Kaplao Kirsch & Rockwell, LLP 101 Connecticut Avenue NW Suite 800 Washington, DC 20036

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket FAA Airport Compliance and Maoagement Analysis, AC0-100 FAA Airports District Office, Phoenix, AZ



# e~.u~-~ ClaudiaRoberts Office ofAirport Compliance aod

Maoagement Analysis
#### § 1022.312 Identification required.

Refer to § 1010.312 of this chapter for identification requirements for reports of transactions in currency filed by money services businesses.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 22

- 0406

_________________ MONTANA TROUT UNLIMITED, MONTANA ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION CENTER, TROUT UNLIMITED, EARTHWORKS, and AMERICAN RIVERS,

Plaint iffs and Appellees,

v. MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY and TINTINA MONTANA INC.,

Defendant s and Appellant s , AND STATE OF MONTANA, by and through THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL , and MEAGHER COUNTY AND BROADWATER COUNTY, Defendants

- Intervenors and Appellants. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for oral argument before the Court sitting en banc and is hereby set for argument on Wednesday, June 2 1 , 2023 , at 9:30 a.m. in the c ourtroom of the Montana Supreme Court, Joseph P. Mazurek Justice Building, Helena, Montana. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to M. R. App. P. 17(3), oral argument times in this cause number shall be forty (40) minutes for the Appellants and thirty (30) minutes for the Appellees. Counsel should be mindful of the provisions of M. R. App. P. 17(6). The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the Honorable Katherine M. Bidegaray, District Judge.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 28 2023

04/28/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0406