alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 34

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 15, 1995

Received and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Ringling

Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus Anniversary Commemoration.

Whereas Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus celebrates its 125th year on April 10, 1995, during its engagement in our Nation’s Capital;

Whereas Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus represents a 200-year tradition of circus in America;

Whereas Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus demonstrates to children of all ages that humans and animals

can work together in harmony and cooperation; and
2

HCON 34 RFS

Whereas Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus is committed to its goal of educating the people of the United

States as to the need to conserve endangered species:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),

3 SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR RINGLING

4 BROS. AND BARNUM & BAILEY CIRCUS ANNI5 VERSARY COMMEMORATION.

6 Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus (herein7 after in this resolution referred to as ‘‘Ringling Bros.’’)

8 shall be permitted to sponsor a public event, with circus

9 elephants and performers, on the Capitol Grounds on

10 April 3, 1995, or on such other date as the Speaker of

11 the House of Representatives and the President pro tem12 pore of the Senate may jointly designate.

13 SEC. 2. CONDITIONS.

14 The event to be carried out under this resolution shall

15 be free of admission charge to the public and arranged

16 not to interfere with the needs of Congress, under condi17 tions to be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol and

18 the Capitol Police Board; except that Ringling Bros. shall

19 assume full responsibility for all expenses and liabilities

20 incident to all activities associated with the event.
3

HCON 34 RFS

1 SEC. 3. STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.

2 For the purposes of this resolution, Ringling Bros.

3 is authorized to erect upon the Capitol grounds, subject

4 to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, such stage,

5 sound amplification devices, and other related structures

6 and equipment as may be required for the event to be car7 ried out under this resolution.

8 SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

9 The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police

10 Board are authorized to make any such additional ar11 rangements that may be required to carry out the event

12 under this resolution.

13 SEC. 5. LIMITATION ON REPRESENTATIONS.

14 Ringling Bros. shall not represent, either directly or

15 indirectly, that this resolution or any activity carried out

16 under this resolution in any way constitutes approval or

17 endorsement by the Federal Government of Ringling Bros.

18 or any product or service offered by Ringling Bros.

Passed the House of Representatives March 14,

1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kenneth Roberts, Appellant.

[803 NYS2d 502]

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Richard A. Keenan, J.), rendered November 8, 2002. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of sexual abuse in the first degree, attempted sexual abuse in the first degree, endangering the welfare of a child, and assault in the third degree (two counts).

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him following a jury trial of sexual abuse in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.65 [1]), attempted sexual abuse in the first degree (§§ 110.00, 130.65 [1]), endangering the welfare of a child (§ 260.10 [1]), and two counts of assault in the third degree (§ 120.00 [1]). We reject the contention of defendant that County Court erred in denying his motion for a mistrial based on testimony elicited by the People regarding a prior bad act by defendant. “The court’s curative instruction alleviated any prejudice to defendant resulting from that testimony, and thus the court properly exercised its discretion in denying his motion” *(People v Colon,*13 AD3d 1198, 1198-1199 [2004], *lv denied*4 NY3d 829 [2005]). The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. We have considered the issues raised in defendant’s pro se supplemental brief and conclude that none warrants reversal. Present—Green, J.P., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Gorski, JJ.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T GI L B E R T O G OME Z - C OT A, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 73289 A ge nc yN o. A 078- 978- 274 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r13, 2010 ** B efo re: S IL V E R M A N , C A L L A H A N , an dN . R . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. G i lbe rt o G om e z - C ot a , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l fr om an im m ig r a tio n ju d g e ’s d e c is io n d e n y in g h is ap p lic a tio n f o rc an c e lla tio n o f

r e m o v a l. O urj ur i s di c t i on i s gove rne d by8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w de novo que s t i ons of 

# FI LED SEP 30 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 73289 2 law . Ra m v . I

NS , 2 4 3 F . 3 d5 1 0 , 5 1 6 (9 thC i r. 2 0 0 1 ). W e d en y i n p artan dd i sm i ss i n p artth e p e t i t i o n f

o rr e v i e w. G o m ez-C o t a’ s co n t en t i o n th atth e B IA ’ s o rd er w as i n ad equ at e fai l s b ecau se the B IA order c on t ai ned “ a s t at em entof i t s r ea sons for denyi ng [G om ez -C ot a] re l i ef adequat e f

or us t o con du ctou r r evi ew . ” Se e G h a l yv . I NS , 58 F . 3d 1425, 14 30 (9th C i r. 19 95 ). W e l ac k j uri sdi ct i on t o revi ew the agency’ s di sc re t i on ary det erm i nat i on that G om e z - C ot af

a i l e d t o s how e xc e pt i ona l and e xtr e m e l yunus ua l har ds hi p t o a qu a lif y in g r e la tiv e . See M

art i nez-R osas v. G on zales , 42 4 F . 3d92 6, 93 0 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 5 ) .P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; D IS M IS S E D i n p art.
§ 26.6694-1 Section 6694 penalties applicable to tax return preparer. ( a ) *In general.* For general definitions regarding section 6694 penalties applicable to preparers of generation-skipping transfer tax returns or claims for refund, see § 1.6694-1 of this chapter.
( b ) *Effective/applicability date.* Paragraph (a) of this section is applicable to returns and claims for refund filed, and advice provided, after December 31, 2008.
[T.D. 9436, 73 FR 78452, Dec. 22, 2008, as amended at 74 FR 5105, Jan. 29, 2009]
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Re:          Annual Statement of Compliance for CFCRE 2016-C6 Mortgage Trust CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-C6

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of November 1, 2016 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer'sknowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 58 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 58

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Friday, April 7, 
1995, it stand adjourned until 12:30 p.m. on Monday, May 1, 1995, or 
until noon on the second day after Members are notified to reassemble 
pursuant to section 3 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs 
first; and that when the Senate adjourns or recesses at the close of 
business on Thursday, April 6, 1995, Friday, April 7, 1995, Saturday, 
April 8, 1995, 
Sunday, April 9, 1995, or Monday, April 10, 1995, pursuant to a motion 
made by the majority leader, or his designee, in accordance with this 
concurrent resolution, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on 
Monday, April 24, 1995, or such time on that day as may be specified by 
the majority leader or his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, 
or until noon on the second day after Members are notified to 
reassemble pursuant to section 3 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. When the House adjourns on the legislative day of 
Wednesday, May 3, 1995, it stand adjourned until 12:30 p.m. on Tuesday, 
May 9, 1995, or until noon on the second day after Members are notified 
to reassemble pursuant to section 3 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 3. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble 
whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 6, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 58

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

            Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.6012-1 Persons required to make returns of income.

For provisions with respect to persons required to make returns of income, see §§ 1.6012-1 to 1.6012-4, inclusive, of this chapter (Income Tax Regulations).
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 153 (Tuesday, August 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40179-40180]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19131]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. OR09-23-000]

BP West Coast Products LLC, Complainant, v. Calnev Pipe Line, 
L.L.C., Respondent; Notice of Complaint

August 4, 2009.
    Take notice that on July 31, 2009, pursuant to Rule 206 of the 
Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission (Commission), 18 CFR 385.206, section 343.2 of the 
Procedural Rules Applicable to Oil Pipeline Proceedings, 18 CFR 343.2, 
sections 1(5), 8, 9, 13, 15, and 16 of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 
U.S.C. App. 1(5), 8, 9, 13, 15, and 16 (1988) and section 1803 of the 
Energy Policy Act of 1992, BP West Coast Products LLC (Complainant) 
filed a formal complaint against Calnev Pipe Line, L.L.C. (Respondent) 
challenging the justness and reasonableness of the index rate increases 
placed into effect by the Respondent's 2009 index rate filing in Docket 
No. IS09-377-000, tendering FERC Tariff Nos. 26 and 27 (superseding 
FERC Tariff Nos. 24 and 25, respectively).
    The Complainant certifies that copies of the complaint were served 
on both counsel for the Respondent and contacts listed on the 
Commission's list of Corporate Officials.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent's 
answer

[[Page 40180]]

and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before the 
comment date. The Respondent's answer, motions to intervene, and 
protests must be served on the Complainants.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible online at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
[email protected], or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on August 20, 2009.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-19131 Filed 8-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
§ 48.4073-1 Exemption of tires of certain sizes. The tax does not apply to sales of tires of all-rubber construction (whether hollow center or solid) if they have no fabric or metal reinforcement and do not exceed either of these measurements: (a) 20 inches in diameter measured to the outside circumferences, and (b) 13 ⁄ 4 inches in cross-section. The exemption provided by section 4073(a) is to be determined solely on the measurements of the tire and not on the purpose for which it is designed or used. (Secs. 4071(b), 4071(c), 4073(c), and 7805, Internal Revenue Code of 1954. (80 Stat. 331, 26 U.S.C. 4071(b); 68A Stat. 482, 26 U.S.C. 4071(c); 70 Stat. 389, 26 U.S.C. 4073(c); 68A Stat. 917, 26 U.S.C. 7805))
[T.D. 7809, 47 FR 6007, Feb. 10, 1982]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Be th Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 28, 2015

p0720 

# Order

Clerk July 28, 2015

150464

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

P laintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 150464

COA: 322848

Jackson CC: 09

- 005355

- FH

TRENT ALLEN GARDNER

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 7, 2014

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
#### Brian Marucheau, Appellant, v Suffolk County Community College et al., Respondents.

[808 NYS2d 119]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Burke, J.), dated October 14, 2004, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The plaintiff, a student at Suffolk County Community College, was injured during his elective course, a “Stage Combat” acting class, when he slipped in the gymnasium while participating in an activity he referred to as a “suicide run.” The defendants established, prima facie, that the plaintiff voluntarily participated in this activity and assumed the risks associated with it *(see Benitez v New York City Bd. of Educ.,*73 NY2d 650, 658 [1989]; *Turcotte v Fell,*68 NY2d 432, 439 [1986]; *see also Morlock v Town of N. Hempstead,*12 AD3d 652 [2004]; *Kazlow v City of New York,*253 AD2d 411 [1998]; *Schlein v White Plains City School Dist.,*292 AD2d 367 [2002]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact.

The theory of inherent compulsion does not apply under the circumstances of this case *(see Benitez v Board of Educ., supra; see also Verduce v Board of Higher Educ. in City of N.Y.,*9 AD2d 214, 219 [1959] [dissenting opn], *revd on dissenting opn*8 NY2d 928 [I960]; *Weber v William Floyd School Dist., UFSD,*272 AD2d 396 [2000]).

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit. Goldstein, J.P., Skelos, Fisher and Lunn, JJ., concur.
----

----

|   | EXHIBIT                32 |
|--------|---------------------------|

| 1.   | The                Report fully complies with the                requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                Act of                1934; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The                information contained in the                Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition                and results of operations of                Gateway. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                Ronald M.                DinerRonald                M. DinerPresidentRaymond                James Tax Credit Funds, Inc.(the                Managing General Partner)February                14, 2008                                                 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
| /s/                Jonathan                OorlogJonathan                OorlogVice                President and Chief Financial OfficerRaymond                James Tax Credit Funds, Inc.(the                Managing General Partner)February                14, 2008 |
§ 31.3306(b)(5)-1 Payments from or to certain tax-exempt trusts, or under or to certain annuity plans or bond purchase plans. ( a ) *Payments from or to certain tax-exempt trusts.* The term “wages” does not include any payment made— ( 1 ) By an employer, on behalf of an employee or his beneficiary, into a trust, or
( 2 ) To, or on behalf of an employee or his beneficiary from a trust, if at the time of such payment the trust is exempt from tax under section 501(a) as an organization described in section 401(a). A payment made to an employee of such a trust for services rendered as an employee of the trust and not as a beneficiary thereof is not within this exclusion from wages.
( b ) *Payments under or to certain annuity plans.* ( 1 ) The term “wages” does not include any payment made after December 31, 1962— ( i ) By an employer, on behalf of an employee or his beneficiary, into an annuity plan, or
( ii ) To, or on behalf of, an employee or his beneficiary under an annuity plan, if at the time of such payment the annuity plan is a plan described in section 403(a).
( 2 ) The term “wages” does not include any payment made before January 1, 1963— ( i ) By an employer, on behalf of an employee or his beneficiary, into an annuity plan, or
( ii ) To, or on behalf of, an employee or his beneficiary under an annuity plan, if at the time of such payment the annuity plan meets the requirements of section 401(a) (3), (4), (5), and (6).
( c ) *Payments under or to certain bond purchase plans.* The term “wages” does not include any payment made after December 31, 1962— ( 1 ) By an employer, on behalf of an employee or his beneficiary, into a bond purchase plan, or
( 2 ) To, or on behalf of, an employee or his beneficiary under a bond purchase plan,
if at the time of such payment the plan is a qualified bond purchase plan described in section 405(a). [T.D. 6658, 28 FR 6636, June 27, 1963]
Order entered January 13, 2020

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 01528
- CV
KEN PAXTON IN HIS OF FICIAL CAPACITY AS A TTORNE Y GENERAL OF THE

STATE OF TEXAS AND THE STA TE OF TEXAS, Appellant s V. ARNIEKA SIMMONS, Appellee On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 18
- 07822



### O RDER The reporter’s record in this accelerated appeal is overdue. Accordingly, we ORDER
Antio nette Reagor, Official Court Reporter for the 68th Judicial District Court, to file the reporter’s record by January 23, 2020

. We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Reagor and all parties.
/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JU STICE