alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.7507-3 Segregated or transferred assets. ( a ) *In general.* In a case involving segregated or transferred assets, it is not necessary, for application of section 7507, that the assets shall technically constitute a trust fund. It is sufficient that segregated assets be definitely separated from other assets of the bank and that transferred assets be definitely separated both from other assets of the bank and from other assets held or owned by the trustee or agent to whom assets of the bank have been transferred; that the bank be wholly or partially released from liability for repayment of deposits as such; and that the depositors have claims against the separated assets. Any excess of separated assets over the amount necessary for payment of such depositors will be available for tax collection after full payment of depositors' claims under the agreement against such assets. But see paragraph (a) of § 301.7507-9.
( b ) *Corporate transferees.* Where the segregated assets are transferred to a separate corporate trustee or corporate agent, the assets and earnings therefrom are within the protection of the section, until full payment of depositors' claims against such assets and earnings, no matter by whom the stock of such corporation is held, and no matter whether the assets be liquidated or operated or held for benefit of the depositors.
(logo) GREYSTONE

 

C-III ASSET MANAGEMENT LLCd/b/a

GREYSTONE SPECIAL SERVICING

5221 N. O’Connor Blvd., Suite800

Irving, Texas 75039

Phone: 972-868-5300

Fax: 972-868-5303

 

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

**C-III Asset Management LLC**

 

The undersigned, Barry Davis,Vice President of C-III Asset Management LLC, the current Special Servicerunder that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1,2016, relating to **the  Morgan Stanley Capital I Trust 2016-BNK2,Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-BKN2** (the“Pooling and Servicing Agreement”), hereby certifies as follows:

 

1.  a review of theactivities of the Special Servicer and of its performance under the Pooling andServicing Agreement during the calendar year 2019 (the “Reporting Period”) hasbeen made under the undersigned’s supervision;

 

2.  to the best of theundersigned’s knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer maintainedan effective internal control system relating to its servicing of the MortgageLoans serviced by it and has fulfilled in all material respects its obligationsunder the Pooling and Servicing Agreement throughout the Reporting Period.

 

Capitalized terms nototherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given them in the Pooling andServicing Agreement.

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, as of the 1st day of March, 2020, I have hereuntosigned my name.

 

/s/ Barry Davis

**Barry Davis**, Vice President
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7026

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

DAVID CARL THOMPSON, JR.,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, 

Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:03-cr-00477-NCT-1)

Submitted: October 22, 2013 Decided: October 25, 2013

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Carl Thompson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett 

Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

David Carl Thompson, Jr., appeals the district court’s 

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United 

States v. Thompson, No. 1:03-cr-00477-NCT-1 (M.D.N.C. June 10, 

2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

AFFIRMED
§ 41.6695-1 Other assessable penalties with respect to the preparation of tax returns for other persons. ( a ) *In general.* A person who is a tax return preparer of any return or claim for refund of excise tax under section 4481 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) shall be subject to penalties for failure to furnish a copy to the taxpayer under section 6695(a) of the Code, failure to sign a return under section 6695(b) of the Code, failure to furnish an identification number under section 6695(c) of the Code, failure to retain a copy or list under section 6695(d) of the Code, failure to file a correct information return under section 6695(e) of the Code, and negotiation of a check under section 6695(f) of the Code, in the manner stated in § 6695-1 of this chapter.
( b ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section is applicable to returns and claims for refund filed after December 31, 2008.
[T.D. 9436, 73 FR 78456, Dec. 22, 2008; 74 FR 5106, Jan. 29, 2009]
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.6501(f)-1 Personal holding company tax.

If a corporation which is a personal holding company for any taxable year fails to file with its income tax return for such year a schedule setting forth the items of gross income described in section 543(a) received by the corporation during such year, and the names and addresses of the individuals who owned, within the meaning of section 544, at any time during the last half of such taxable year, more than 50 percent in value of the outstanding capital stock of the corporation, the personal holding company tax for such year may be assessed, or a proceeding in court for the collection thereof may be begun without assessment, at any time within 6 years after the return for such year was filed.
§ 31.6682-1 False information with respect to withholding. ( a ) *Civil penalty.* If any individual makes a statement under section 3402 (relating to income tax collected at source) which results in a lesser amount of income tax actually deducted and withheld than is properly allowable under section 3402 and, at the time the statement was made, there was no reasonable basis for the statement, the individual shall pay a penalty of $500 for the statement. There was a reasonable basis for a statement of the number of exemptions an individual claimed on a Form W-4, if the individual properly completed the Form W-4 by taking into account only allowable amounts for items which are allowable and by computing the number of exemptions in accordance with the instructions on the Form W-4. This penalty is in addition to any criminal penalty provided by law. This penalty may be assessed at any time after the statement is made, until the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations.
( b ) *Deficiency procedures not to apply.* The civil penalty imposed by section 6682 may be assessed and collected without regard to the deficiency procedures provided by Subchapter B of Chapter 63 of the Code.
[T.D. 7963, 49 FR 28706, July 16, 1984]
§ 20.2016-1 Recovery of death taxes claimed as credit. In accordance with the provisions of section 2016, the executor (or any other person) receiving a refund of any State death taxes or foreign death taxes claimed as a credit under section 2011 or section 2014 shall notify the district director of the refund within 30 days of its receipt. The notice shall contain the following information: ( a ) The name of the decedent;
( b ) The date of the decedent's death;
( c ) The property with respect to which the refund was made;
( d ) The amount of the refund, exclusive of interest;
( e ) The date of the refund; and
( f ) The name and address of the person receiving the refund.
If the refund was in connection with foreign death taxes claimed as a credit under section 2014, the notice shall also contain a statement showing the amount of interest, if any, paid by the foreign country on the refund. Finally, the person filing the notice shall furnish the district director such additional information as he may request. Any Federal estate tax found to be due by reason of the refund is payable by the person or persons receiving it, upon notice and demand, even though the refund is received after the expiration of the period of limitations set forth in section 6501 (see section 6501(c)(5)). If the tax found to be due results from a refund of foreign death tax claimed as a credit under section 2014, such tax shall not bear interest for any period before the receipt of the refund, except to the extent that interest was paid by the foreign country on the refund.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: G. H. v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-13-00422-CV and 01-13-00423-CV

Trial court case number: MH4237 and MH4237A

Trial court: Probate Court of Galveston County

Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to consolidate the appeals. The motion is 

denied. Appellant may, however, file one brief for both cause numbers, if appellant so

chooses, and the appeals will be submitted to the same panel on the same date. Briefing 

deadlines are suspended in each appeal and will be set once the record is complete. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: June 6, 2013
#### Daveretta A. HAYES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MASS TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 02-1291.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 13, 2002.

Decided June 18, 2002.

Daveretta A. Hayes, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Jessie Lyons Crawford, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Daveretta A. Hayes appeals the district court’s order and order on reconsideration granting summary judgment to the Appellee in her employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *644
      *Hayes v. Mass Transit Admin.,*No. CA-00-3790-AMD (D. Md. Jan. 22 *&*Feb. 6, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6494

CARL BARLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KEITH ADAMS, Inmate Officer; KEITH BROWN, Sgt.; JAMES WOODWARD, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-01-995-7) Submitted: June 20, 2002 Decided: June 26, 2002 Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Carl Barley, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Carl Barley seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because Barley’s notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on February 7, 2002. Barley’s notice of appeal was filed on March 18, 2002. Because Barley failed to file a timely notice of appeal or move for and obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Dominic J. Carilli *v.*City of Hartford

*Joseph J. Burns,*on the motion.

Submitted September 13

decided September 18, 1963

The motion by the defendant for an extension until September 30, 1963, of the time heretofore limited by this court for the filing of the defendant’s brief on reargument of its appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Hartford County is granted.
Gibbons Pickering Hardesty , C.J. 

# pc, jag Pa uirre

il 

### \i-r/ft J. Douglas J.

Saitta

J. J. 533.450(1) and (9) (governing appeal rights in water law cases). Accordingly, writ relief is precluded, and we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

cc: Hon. Robert E. Estes, Senior Judge Attorney General/Carson City Dana R. Walsh Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP/Las Vegas Taggart & Taggart, Ltd. Gregory J. Walch Weinstein, Pinson & Riley Alexander, Berkey, Williams & Weathers LLP Iris Thornton J. Mark Ward Rhodes Law Office, Ltd. Lionel Sawyer & Collins/Las Vegas Echo Hawk Law Office Kaempfer Crowell/Reno Simeon M. Herskovits Holland & Hart LLP/Reno O'Reilly Law Group McCracken, Stemerman & Holsberry White Pine County Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF 2 NEVADA

(0) 1947A AtMo
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets and unaudited condensed
consolidated statements of income found on pages 3 and 4 of the Company's Form
10-QSB for the year to date, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             852
<SECURITIES>                                         0      
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   852
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     852
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,687
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       163,188
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (146,353)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       852 
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   702
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (702)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (702)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

</TABLE>
Exhibit 35.24  LOGO ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE OF LNR PARTNERS, LLC The undersigned, Job Warshaw,
being the President of LNR Partners, LLC (the Special Servicer), as special servicer under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the transactions listed on Schedule I hereto, hereby certifies, subject to any
limitations listed on Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, on behalf of the Special Servicer, solely in his capacity as an authorized officer of the Special Servicer and not in his individual capacity, as follows:  1.
A review of the activities performed by the Special Servicer during the period commencing on January 1,
2018 and ending on December 31, 2018 (or any other shorter period set forth on Schedule I hereto) (the Reporting Period), and of the Special Servicers performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made
under my supervision; and  2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review and using the applicable servicing criteria under Item 1122
of Regulation AB, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.  LNR PARTNERS, LLC, a Florida
limited liability companyBy:

/s/ Job WarshawJob WarshawPresident
 Dated: February 19, 2019   1601 Washington Avenue  Suite 700
 Miami Beach, Florida 33139-3164 Telephone: (305) 695-5600  Fax: (305) 695-5601




---

Schedule I WFCM 2016-C37 Wells
Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust 2016-C37, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-C37 (Quantum Park- CGCMT 2016-P6, CGCMT 2016-C3) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 9062 Old Annapolis Road ATTN: WFCM 2016-C37 Columbia MD 21045 1951 Corporate Trust (CMBS) Bond Group Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 9062 Old Annapolis Road Columbia MD 21045 Group Notices Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. c/o Wells Fargo
Securities, LLC 375 Park Avenue, 2nd Floor J0127-023 New York NY 10152 A.J. Sfarra Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. Wells Fargo Law Department D1053-300 301 South
College St., Charlotte NC 28288 Jeff D. Blake Wilmington Trust, National Association Global Capital Markets Structured Finance 1100 N. Market Street- 5th Floor Wilmington DE 19890 Beverly D. Capers Wilmington Trust, National Association 1100 North Market Street Wilmington DE 19890 Group Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc. 388 Greenwich
Street, 11th Floor New York NY 10013
Order: 2014

- 1

- 18

Served January 28 , 2014



### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation

on the 28th day of January , 2014

Essential Air Service at

KINGMAN, ARIZONA

Under 49 U.S.C. 41731 et seq

. DOCKET DOT

- OST

- 1996

- 1899



### ORDER APPROVING ALTERNATE SERVICE PATTERN

Summary

By this Order, the Department is approving the request of Great Lakes Aviat ion, Ltd. (Great

Lakes) to change par t of its service pattern at Kingman , Arizo na

, to include the option of one

stop service to Denver International Airport (Denver) via Telluride, Colorado

, effective

January 3 1, 2014.

Background

By Order 2013

- 3

- 4, (June 3, 2013) , the Department re

- selected Gr eat Lakes to provide

subsidized Essential Air Service (EAS) at Kingman for the two

- year period through

April 30, 2015 . That Order establis hed a n annual subsidy rate of $1,635,180 for service

consisting of 12 weekly nonstop round trips to either Los Angeles International Airport (Los

Angeles) or Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (Phoenix)

.

Airline Proposal

As a result of the severe pilot shortage at Great Lakes

, the airline has requested that the

De partment allow the m the option to serve Kingman from i t s Denver hub, effective

January 3 1, 2014.

Community Comments

David C. French, Executive Director of Kingman Airport Authority

, submitted comments on

January 2 1, 2014 , stating that he conc urred with Great Lakes ’ request to include Denver as a

hub from which to serve Kingman

.- 2

-

Decision

We will approve Great Lakes’ request, which meets the three conditions necessary for approval

under authority assigned under 14 CFR Part 385.12 (k)(3) of the Department ’s Regu l at ions: (1)

the alternate service pattern is equal or greater than that determined to be essential; (2) the

community does not object to the alternate service pattern; and (3) the alternate service pattern

will not increase Great Lakes’ subsidy.

T his Order is issued under authority delegated in 14 CFR Part 385.12k(3).

ACCORDINGLY,

1. We hereby approve the alternate service pattern requested by Grea t Lak es Aviation, Ltd., to

serve Kingman , Arizona

, from the hubs of Denver (via Telluride, Colorado), Los Angeles , and

Phoenix effective January 3 1, 2014 through April 30 , 2015 ;

2

. This docket will remain open until further order of the Department; and

3. The Department will serve a copy of this O rder on the Mayor and the Executive Director of

Kingman Airport Authority , and Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd.

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of this O rder under the Department’s

Regulations, 14 CFR Part 385.31 (a) , mus t file such petitions within seven (7 ) days aft er the

date of service of this O rder.

This O rder will be effective immediately, and the filing of a petition for review shall not

preclude its effectiveness.

By:

TODD M. HOMAN

Director

Office of Aviation Analysis

(SEAL)
www.gpo.gov

### §282k. Securities issued by Corporation

#### (a) Exemption from securities laws; reports to Securities and Exchange Commission

Any securities issued by the Corporation (including any guaranty by the Corporation, whether or not limited in scope) and any securities guaranteed by the Corporation as to both principal and interest shall be deemed to be exempted securities within the meaning of section 77c(a)(2) of title 15 and section 78c(a)(12) of title 15. The Corporation shall file with the Securities and Exchange Commission such annual and other reports with regard to such securities as the Commission shall determine to be appropriate in view of the special character of the Corporation and its operations and necessary in the public interest or for the protection of investors.

#### (b) Authority of Securities and Exchange Commission to suspend exemption; reports to Congress

The Securities and Exchange Commission, acting in consultation with the National Advisory Council on International Monetary and Financial Problems, is authorized to suspend the provisions of subsection (a) of this section at any time as to any or all securities issued or guaranteed by the Corporation during the period of such suspension. The Commission shall include in its annual reports to the Congress such information as it shall deem advisable with regard to the operations and effect of this section.

(Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 788, §13, as added Pub. L. 101–513, title V, §562(e)(1)(A), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 2037.)