alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### II**~** I! [ I I Ii 

## ! 

# I

,**~SI~I'l"~**

# (~ DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES

Devon Hill Keller & HecmanLLP 100I G Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 E-mail: hill@khlaw.com

Dear Mr. Hill: April 14, 2011 Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 5100 Paint Branch Parkway College Park, MD 20740

This letteris in response to your**~ubmission,** received on March 8, 20II,requesting on behalfofNalco Company, FDA's concurrence that chlorourearesidues are not expected to become components offood as a result ofthe use ofa urea-stabilized sodium hypochlorite solution as an anti-microbial in the wetend manufacture offood contactpaper and paperboard. Your request has been logged in under correspondence tracking system as CTS 2011-1877

.. You provided for our review a narrative ofthe intended use regarding the fate· ofchlorourea !esidues in the paper making process. N-chlorourea and N,N' -dichlorourea are residues formed bythe reaction of urea and sodium hypochlorite. Urea.is listed as GRAS under 21 CFR 184.1923 and sodium hypochlorite is listed under 21 CFR 178.1010 (sanitizing solutions). Based on the reaction you described, we believe that when chlorourearesidues are formed in the presence ofsodium hydroxide, there is apossibility that hydrazine and semicarbazide which are known carcinogens may be formed as well. We requested on March 28, 2011 that you address the likelihood that residual hydrazine and semicarbazide could remain in the fmished paper and paperboard. You submitted your response on April 8, 2011. Based on this response, we have concluded that although it is possible to synthesize hydrazine and samicarbazide from these materials, the conditions in the head box ofpaper making are not conducive to such synthesis; the pH used in the paperprocessing is not nearly high enough and the materials are quite dilute. Based on all the information you provided, we have determined that most ofthe chlorourearesidues is expected to be consumed bythe oxidant demand ofthe paper manufacturing system, or to hydrolyze rather than to become a component ofthe pulp or paper. Further, any chlorourearesidue that does become incorporated into the paper is expected to volatilize or decompose when the sheet is stearn dried at high temperatores in the paper making process. Therefore, 

### we have concluded that chlorourea : residues are not expected to become components offood as aresult ofyour proposed use as a biocide, at levels not to exceed 10 ppm (mglkg), in the manufacture offood-contact paper and paperboard.Page 2

- Mr. Hill

Ifyou have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact us.

# s~_,, __

# ~ Francis Lin, Ph.D. Director Division ofFood Contact Notifications, HFS-275 Office ofFood Additive Safety Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT TONY ASB ERR

Y, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. PHELPS, De fe nda

nt - Appe lle e . No. 13-16899 D.C . No. 2:09-c v-01494-M C EKJN M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Ea ste rn Distric t of C a lifornia M orrison C . Engla

nd, Jr., C hie f Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

Nove m b e r 18, 2014 ** B e fore : LEAVY, FISHER , a nd N.R . SM ITH, C irc uit Judge s. C a lifornia sta te prisone r Tony

Asbe rry a ppe a ls pro se from

the distric t c ourt’ s sum

m ary judgm e nt in his 42 U.S.C . § 1983 a c tion a lle ging viola tions of his right to e qua l prote c tion under the Fourte e nth Am e ndm e nt in c onne c tion with his prison housing a ssignm e nts. W e have jurisdic tion under 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e 

# F IL ED DEC 04 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).re vie w de novo, FDIC v . He nde rson , 940 F.2d 465, 471 (1991), a n d we a ffirm . The distric t c ourt prope rly grante d sum

m a ry judgm e nt be c a

use Asbe rry fa ile d to ra ise a

ge nuine disputeof m ate ria l fa c t a s to whe the r de fe nda nt inte ntiona lly

disc rim inate d a ga inst him on the ba sis of ra c e . Se eBarre n v . Harrington , 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th C ir. 1998) (orde r) (a § 1983 e qua l prote c tion c la im re quire s showing tha

t the de fe n da

nt “ a c te d with a

n inte nt or purposeto disc rim inate a ga inst thepla intiff ba se d upon m e m be rship in a

prote c te d c la ss” ); se e also C afasso, U.S. e

x re l. v . Ge n. Dy namic

s C 4 Sy s., Inc . , 637 F.3d 1047, 1061 (9th C ir. 2011) (“ To survivesum m ary judgm e nt, a

pla intiff m

ust se t forth non-spe c ulat ive e vide nc e of spe c ific fa c ts, not swe e ping c onc lusory a lle gations.” ). W e do not c onside r m atte rs not spe c ific a lly an d distinc tly

ra i se d a nd a rgue d in the ope ning brie f. Se ePadge tt v . W right , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th C ir. 2009) (pe r c uriam ). De fe nda nt’ s unoppose d m otion to supple m e nt the re c ord, file d on June9, 2014, is gra

nte d. AFFIRM E D.

1 3 - 1 6 8 9 9 2
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 152 (Monday, August 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 39964]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19080]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Clinical Center; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the NIH 
Advisory Board for Clinical Research.
    The meeting will be open to the public as indicated below, with 
attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend 
and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or 
other reasonable accommodations, should notify the Contact Person 
listed below in advance of the meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended 
to discuss personnel matters, the disclosure of which would constitute 
a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.

    Name of Committee: NIH Advisory Board for Clinical Research.
    Date: September 21, 2009.
    Open: 10 a.m. to 1:15 p.m.
    Agenda: To review the Clinical Center budget plans and updates 
on selected organizational initiatives.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Building 10, 10 Center 
Drive, CRC Medical Board Room 4-2551, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Closed: 1:15 p.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate to discuss personnel matters.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Building 10, 10 Center 
Drive, CRC Medical Board Room 4-2551, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Maureen E Gormley, Executive Secretary, Mark O. 
Hatfield, Clinical Research Center, National Institutes of Health, 
Building 10, Room 6-2551, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-2897.
    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.
    In the interest of security, NIH has instituted stringent 
procedures for entrance onto the NIH campus. All visitor vehicles, 
including taxicabs, hotel, and airport shuttles will be inspected 
before being allowed on campus. Visitors will be asked to show one 
form of identification (for example, a government-issued photo ID, 
driver's license, or passport) and to state the purpose of their 
visit.


    Dated: August 4, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-19080 Filed 8-7-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                   GTECH HOLDINGS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                (Unaudited)
                                                                             Nine Months Ended
                                                                      --------------------------------
                                                                      November 22,        November 23,
                                                                          2003                2002
                                                                      -----------         -----------
                                                                   (Dollars in thousands, except ratios)
<S>                                                                   <C>                 <C>
Earnings:

   Income before income taxes                                         $   214,871         $   161,419
   Add:
      Interest on indebtedness                                              6,997               8,371
      Equity income, net of distributions                                    (263)                559
      Minority interests                                                    3,540               1,548
      Portion of rents representative of the interest factor                4,833               4,833
      Amortization of capitalized interest                                    540                 925
                                                                      -----------         -----------
         Adjusted earnings                                            $   230,518         $   177,655
                                                                      ===========         ===========

FIXED CHARGES:
      Interest on indebtedness                                              6,997               8,371
      Portion of rents representative of the interest factor                4,833               4,833
      Capitalized interest                                                  1,376                  21
                                                                      -----------         -----------
         Total fixed charges                                          $    13,206         $    13,225
                                                                      ===========         ===========

           Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                               17.46               13.43
                                                                      ===========         ===========
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000855876
<NAME> CITIZENS BANCSHARES INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          29,309
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             255
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,050
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    302,725
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          53,485
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            53,382
<LOANS>                                        605,067
<ALLOWANCE>                                     11,439
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,011,258
<DEPOSITS>                                     714,791
<SHORT-TERM>                                   153,935
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              7,613
<LONG-TERM>                                     43,813
<COMMON>                                        16,514
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      73,965
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,011,258
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 14,264
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,986
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    37
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                19,287
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,792
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,815
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           10,472
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      418
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,250
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,156
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       6,156
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,109
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .70
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.52
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,693
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,125
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   411
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,348
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                11,350
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      573
<RECOVERIES>                                       244
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               11,439
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,059
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          9,380
        

</TABLE>
[Cite as Groves v. Mallory, 125 Ohio St.3d 160, 2010-Ohio-1805.]

G ROVES , A PPELLANT , v. M ALLORY , J UDGE , A PPELLEE . [Cite as Groves v. Mallory, 125 Ohio St.3d 160, 2010-Ohio-1805.] Appeal from dismissal of a petition for a writ of mandamus — Timely appeal not filed — Judgment affirmed. (No. 2009-2256

— Submitted April 20, 2010

— Decided April 28, 2010.)
A PPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, No. C-090777.

__________________ Per Curiam. {¶ 1} We dismiss the appeal of a ppellant, Larry Groves, because although he challenges the court of appeals’ Septembe r 2009 judgment dismissing his petition for a writ of mandamus, he did not file a timely appeal from that judgment. S.Ct.Prac.R. 2.2(A)(1)(a) (“To perfect an appeal from a court of appeals to the Supreme Court * * *, the appe llant shall file a notice of appeal in the Supreme Court within forty-five days from the entry of the judgment being appealed”); State ex rel. Martin v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. , 124 Ohio St.3d 63, 2009-Ohio-6164, 918 N.E.2d 1005, ¶ 1. Neither the court of appeals’ November 2009 entry striking Groves’s initial notice of appeal, which was erroneously filed by him in the court of appeals instead of this court, nor the court of appeals’ November 2009 entry denying his motion for reconsideration of its dismissal of the mandamus petition extended his time to appeal the court of appeals’ September 2009 judgment dismissi ng his mandamus petition. Id. Appeal dismissed.
P FEIFER , A CTING C.J., and L UNDBERG S TRATTON , O’C ONNOR , O’D ONNELL , L ANZINGER , and C UPP , JJ., concur.
The late C HIEF J USTICE T HOMAS J. M OYER did not participate in the
decision in this case.S UPREME C OURT OF O HIO

2 __________________ Larry Groves, pro se. Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Pr osecuting Attorney, and Phillip R. Cummings, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

__________________
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 13

- 00114

- CV

PATRICK LEE MULLINS

, Appellant

v.

THE HONORABLE MARK H OLT

, Appellee

From the Justice of the Peace Court

Precinct 3

Walker County, Texas

ORDER

Subsequent to the issuance of an opinion on May 9, 2013 in which we dismissed

Patrick Lee Mullins’s appeal as frivolous, Mullins presented two motions for filing with

the Court:

1. “Appellants Late Motio n for Leave to File Affidavit of Indigence so as

to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal;” and

2. “Appellant’s First Verified Motion to Suspend Rule 9.5, Tex. R. App.

Pro.”Mullins v. Holt Page 2

We have processed Mullins’s appeal as if Mullins was pro se as was made quite

clear i n his initial filings. Further, Mullins’s appeal was processed on the limited

number of copies we received.

Accordingly, Mullins’s belated motion for leave to proceed as a pauper is

unnecessary; and we dismiss both the motion for leave to file and the mo tion to waive

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.5 as moot.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motions dismissed

Order issued and filed May 2 3 , 2013
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.7429-1 Review of jeopardy and termination assessment and jeopardy levy procedures; information to taxpayer.

Not later than 5 days after the day on which an assessment is made under section 6851(a), 6852(a), 6861(a), or 6862, or a levy is made under section 6331(a) without complying with the notice before levy provisions of section 6331(d), the district director shall provide the taxpayer a written statement setting forth the information upon which the district director relies in authorizing such assessment or levy.

[T.D. 8453, 57 FR 58985, Dec. 14, 1992]
EXHIBIT 32.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS


Solely for the purposes of complying with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, we, William D. Gehl, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer,
and Kenneth P. Hahn, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer, of
Gehl Company, certify, based on our knowledge, that:

     (1)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 28, 2003
          (the "Periodic Report") to which this statement is an exhibit fully
          complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and

     (2)  information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Gehl Company.

Dated:  August 11, 2003

                                  /s/ William D. Gehl
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                 William D. Gehl

                                  /s/ Kenneth P. Hahn
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                 Kenneth P. Hahn
MARTHA VIGIL, ANDY BLACKLEDGE and ROBIN SILVER, Petitioners, v.

MICHAEL O. LEAVITT, * Administrator, United States Environmental Protection

Agency; WAYNE NASTRI, Regional Administrator, Region IX; and UNITED

STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondents.

* Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 43(c), Michael O. Leavitt is automatically

substituted as a party respondent for Christie Whitman.

No. 02-72424

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

381 F.3d 826; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 18495

September 1, 2004, Decided

PRIOR HISTORY: [**1] On Petition for Review of

an Order of the Environmental Protection Agency.

Vigil v. Leavitt, 366 F.3d 1025, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS

9069 (9th Cir., 2004)

JUDGES: Before: Susan P. Graber, Kim McLane

Wardlaw, and Jay S. Bybee, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

[*829] ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND

GRANTING IN PART RESPONDENTS' MOTION

FOR CLARIFICATION OR FOR REHEARING BY

THE PANEL

The opinion, filed May 10, 2004, slip opinion 595,

and appearing at 366 F.3d 1025 (9th Cir. 2004), is

amended as follows:

1. At slip op. 5967, first full paragraph, line 25; 366

F.3d at 1033, second full paragraph, line 39, delete "and

applied here in the approval of Arizona's SIP."

2. At slip op. 5967, first full paragraph, line 26; 366

F.3d at 1033, second full paragraph, line 41, insert the

following: "We need not resolve the question whether the

EPA's interpretation of the Act in the course of approving

Arizona's SIP is entitled to Chevron deference, because

the result in the present case would be the same under

any standard of deference."

With these amendments, the panel has voted to grant

in part respondents' motion for clarification or for

rehearing by the panel. Respondents' Motion for

Clarification or for Rehearing by the Panel has been

considered and [**2] it is GRANTED IN PART. No

further petitions for rehearing may be filed.

Page 1
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel:  410 884 2000  Fax:  410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial MortgageSecurities Corp.

383 Madison Avenue

31st Floor

New York, New York 10179

 

Re:  Annual Statement ofCompliance for JPMCC Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2016-JP3 CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-JP3

 

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of September 1, 2016 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the

"Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|