alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 20.2056A-9 Designated Filer.

Section 2056A(b)(2)(C) provides special rules where more than one QDOT is established with respect to a decedent. The designation of a person responsible for filing a return under section 2056A(b)(2)(C)(i) (the Designated Filer) must be made on the decedent's federal estate tax return, or on the first Form 706-QDT that is due and is filed by its prescribed date, including extensions. The Designated Filer must be a U.S. Trustee. If the U.S. Trustee is an individual, that individual must have a tax home (as defined in section 911(d)(3)) in the United States. At least sixty days before the due date for filing the tax returns for all of the QDOTs, the U.S. Trustee(s) of each of the QDOTs must provide to the Designated Filer all of the necessary information relating to distributions from their respective QDOTs. The section 2056A estate tax due from each QDOT is allocated on a pro rata basis (based on the ratio of the amount of each respective distribution constituting a taxable event to the amount of all such distributions), unless a different allocation is required under the terms of the governing instrument or under local law. Unless the decedent has provided for a successor Designated Filer, if the Designated Filer ceases to qualify as a U.S. Trustee, or otherwise becomes unable to serve as the Designated Filer, the remaining trustees of each QDOT must select a qualifying successor Designated Filer (who is also a U.S. Trustee) prior to the due date for the filing of Form 706-QDT (including extensions). The selection is to be indicated on the Form 706-QDT. Failure to select a successor Designated Filer will result in the application of section 2056A(b)(2)(C).

[T.D. 8612, 60 FR 43550, Aug. 22, 1995]
#### § 48.4061(b)-1 Imposition of tax.

(a) *In general.* Section 4061(b) imposes a tax on the sale by the manufacturer, producer, or importer of parts or accessories (other than tires and inner tubes and other than automobile radio and television receiving sets) for any of the articles enumerated in section 4061 (a) (see paragraph (a) of § 48.4061 (a)-1).

(b) *Rates of tax.* Tax is imposed on the sale of parts or accessories for any of the articles enumerated in section 4061(a) at the rates specified below:

| | *Percent* |
| --- | --- |
| (1) Parts or accessories sold during the period January 1, 1959, to June 30, 1965, inclusive | 8 |
| (2) Parts or accessories sold on or after July 1, 1965 | 5 |

The tax is computed by applying to the price for which the part or accessory is sold the rate in effect at the time of the sale. For definition of the term “price” see section 4216 and the regulations thereunder contained in Subpart M of this part.

(c) *Liability for tax.* The tax imposed by section 4061(b) is payable by the manufacturer, producer, or importer making the sale.

[T.D. 6648, 28 FR 3633, Apr. 13, 1963, as amended by T.D. 6753, 29 FR 12717, Sept. 9, 1964]
MEMORANDUM

TO: Record

FROM: James K. O’Connell, ERG

DATE: 18 February 2015

SUBJECT: 2014 IWC Webinars Materials (DCN SGE01068)

On April 21st, ERG attended the 2014 IWC Webinar. The webinar materials in the 

following table are provided as attachments:
Memorandum

18 February 2015

Page 2 of 3

Attachment 

DCN Presenter Name and Affiliation Presentation Title Abstract

SGE01068.A01

Huffmyer, Russell; John VanGehuchten; 

James Silva – Nuverra Environmental 

Solutions, Inc.; HD Engineering Inc.

Best of IWC Webinar: Frac 

Water

Conference Proceedings from IWC 2013 

discussing drilling fluid composition, example 

treatment data, well drilling fluid treatment 

drill cuttings treatment, drilling mud 

treatment, drilling wstewater treatment, and 

example treatment facility.

SGE01068.A02 Silva, James; Rachel Gettings; William 

Kostedt; Vicki Watkins

Pretreatment Targets for 

Salt Recovery from 

Marcellus Shale Gas 

Produced Water

Conference Proceedings from IWC 2013 

discussing determing pretreatment target and 

extent of crystal treatment needed to reduce 

Ba and Ra levels in PA Marcellus produced 

water using Aspen Plus/OLI crystallizer 

model.

SGE01068.A03

Huffmyer; John Van Gehuchten –

Heckmann Water Resources; HDR 

Engineering Inc.

Recovering Valuable 

Byproducts from Oil and 

Gas Wastes

Conference Proceedings from IWC 2013 

discussing recovery of valuable mud and 

wastewater components during treatment and 

disposal of oil and gas wells for sale and 

reuse.

SGE01068.A04 Schubert, P.E., John – HDR

Prepared Discussion of: 

Recovering Valuable 

Byproducts from Oil and 

Gas Wastes

Discussion of questions raised in the report 

"Recovering Valuable Byproducts from Oil 

and Gas Wastes: (see DCN SGE01068.A03).

SGE01068.A05

Silva, James; Rachel Gettings; William 

Kostedt; Vicki Watkins – GE Global 

Resarch Center

Pretreatment Targets for 

Salt Recovery from 

Marcellus Shale Gas 

Produced Water

Discussion of methodology for defining 

pretreatment targets for Ba and Ra and 

showing that water and salt ecovery from 

Marcellus produced water is economically 

attractive.

SGE01068.A06 Penland, Jerry L. – Chester Engineers

Prepared Discussion of: 

Pretreatment Targets for 

Salt Recovery from 

Marcellus Shale Gas 

Produced Water

Discussion of questions raised in the report 

"Pretreatment Targets for Salt Recovery from 

Marcellus Shale Gas Produced Water (see 

SGE01068.A02).
Memorandum

18 February 2015

Page 3 of 3

ATTACHMENTS
**Exhibit 32.1**

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of HQ Sustainable Maritime Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Norbert Sporns, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: November 13, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8063 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8063

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To authorize the Secretary of the Army to posthumously award the 
   Distinguished Service Cross to William D. Owens for his valorous 
 actions from June 6, 1944, to June 8, 1944, during World War II at La 
    Fiere Bridge in Normandy, France, while serving with the 505th 
                          Parachute Infantry.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION FOR POSTHUMOUS AWARD OF THE DISTINGUISHED 
              SERVICE CROSS TO WILLIAM D. OWENS FOR ACTS OF VALOR AT LA 
              FIERE BRIDGE.

    (a) Waiver of Time Limitations.--Notwithstanding the time 
limitations specified in section 7274 of title 10, United States Code, 
or any other time limitation with respect to the awarding of certain 
medals to persons who served in the Armed Forces, the Secretary of the 
Army may award the Distinguished Service Cross under section 7272 of 
such title to William D. Owens for the acts of valor at La Fiere Bridge 
described in subsection (b).
    (b) Acts of Valor Described.--The acts of valor referred to in 
subsection (a) are the actions of William D. Owens from June 6, 1944, 
to June 8, 1944, at La Fiere Bridge for which he was previously awarded 
the Bronze Star Medal.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 8, 2024.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 8063

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To authorize the Secretary of the Army to posthumously award the 
   Distinguished Service Cross to William D. Owens for his valorous 
 actions from June 6, 1944, to June 8, 1944, during World War II at La 
    Fiere Bridge in Normandy, France, while serving with the 505th 
                          Parachute Infantry.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,597,578
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  939,160
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,119,675
<PP&E>                                       2,046,871
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,065,576
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,146,477
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,477,331
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,178
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,651,968
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,141,477
<SALES>                                      3,673,672
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,673,672
<CGS>                                        1,964,421
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,964,421
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               773,451
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                935,800
<INCOME-TAX>                                   346,246
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            589,554
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   589,554
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05


</TABLE>
L^i.."' i i.;

- I 

# DECEIVE D Oc C 

### 2 2 U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATION * A o i KI/- * r»r\/>ly^r-r

OFFir FO FTTFAPTNn S "^-ARIN GDOCKE T OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C

I NTH EMATTE RO FC J SYSTEM S AVIATIO NGROUP , INC. , Respondent . FA A Docke t

No . CP09EA002 0 DM S No . FAA-2009-058 4 (Civi l Penalt y Proceeding ) Judg e Isaa c D . Benki n

MOTIO NFO RCONTINUANC E Respondent , C J System s Aviatio nGroup , Inc . ("C J Systems") , hereb y respectfull y request s apostponemen t o f th e hearin g schedule dfor Januar y 5 , 2010 , i nthi s matter . Counse l fo r

th e Complainant , Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio n("FAA") , join s i n thi s request . Responden t

ha s bee nengage di ndiscussion s withth e FA A regardin g thi s an d othe r pendin g an dpotentia l enforcemen t matter s relatin g t o C J Systems . Rathe r than addres s thes e item s o napiecemea l basis , th e partie s ar e attemptin g t o an dma y conclud e abroade r arrangemen t

resolvin g thi s an dothe r

matters . Consequently , i nth e interes t o f judicia l econom y an defficiency , th e hearin g i nthi s matte r shoul db e postpone dt o enabl e th e partie s tim e t o eithe r

settl e thi s cas e individuall y o r a s par t o f abroade r

settlement . I f however , neithe r

i s possibl e withi n4 5 days , th e partie s wil l provid e You r Hono r wit hastatu s report . Respectfiill y submitted , SILVERBERG , GOLDMA N& BIKOFF , L.L.P . Attorney s for

C J System s Aviatio nGroup , Inc .

Rober t P . Silverber g 110 1 30* ^ Stree t N.W. , Suit e 12 0 Washington , D.C . 2000 7 Tel : (202 ) 944-330 0 Fax : (202 ) 944-330 6CERTIFICAT EO FSERVIC E I hereb y certif

y tha t I hav e thi s 14 * da y o f

December , 2009 , serve dth e foregoin g Motio nfo r

Continuanc e b y Firs t Clas s Mai l t o th e followin g address : Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio n 80 0 Independenc e Ave. , S.W . Washington , D.C . 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W100 0 b y Facsimil e an dFirs t

Clas s Mai l t o th e followin g address : Th e Honorabl e Isaa c D . Benkin , Administrativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D.C . 2059 0 Fax : (202 ) 366-753 6 an db y E-mai l an dFirs t

Clas s Mai l t o th e followin g address : Christia nL . Leweren z Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counse l EasternRegio n Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio n 1 Aviatio nPlaz a Jamaica , N Y 1143 4 christian.lewerenz@faa . go v 

# L.^/ . Robert P . Silverber g
#### Gladys A. MCALISTER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE; G. Simms, Officer; County of Riverside Sheriffs Department, a political subdivision of the State of California; Los Angeles County, Defendants—Appellees, and Daniel Freeman Hospital; Exodus Recovery, Inc., a corporation doing business in the City of Los Angeles; Judy Fair Weather; David Wehmeyer, Defendants.

No. 01-55480.

D.C. No. CV-99-06152-ABC.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 10, 2002.*

Decided June 13, 2002.

*311Before O’SCANNLAIN, BERZON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Gladys McAlister appeals pro se the district court’s order dismissing her first amended complaint alleging conspiracy pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985, and several state law claims. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dep't,*901 F.2d 696, 699 (9th Cir. 1988), and we affirm.

McAlister faded to allege any facts from which a conspiracy between defendants could be inferred, and her mere allegations do not set forth a constitutional deprivation under any cognizable theory. *See id.*Because McAlister was informed of the deficiencies of her complaint and her amended complaint failed to cure the deficiencies, the district court properly dismissed McAlister’s federal conspiracy claim without leave to amend. *See id.*

The district court did not abuse its discretion by declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims after the dismissal of the sole federal claim. *See Acri v. Vanan Assocs., Inc.,*114 F.3d 999, 1001 (9th Cir.1997).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
```

[113th Congress Public Law 91]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 128 STAT. 1038]]

Public Law 113-91
113th Congress

                            Joint Resolution

 
Providing for the reappointment of John W. McCarter as a citizen regent 
of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. <<NOTE: Mar. 21, 
                        2014 -  [S.J. Res. 32]>> 

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on the 
Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other than 
Members of Congress, occurring by reason of the expiration of the term 
of John W. McCarter of Illinois on March 14, 2014, is filled by the 
reappointment of the incumbent. The reappointment is for a term of 6 
years, beginning on March 15, 2014, or the date of enactment of this 
joint resolution, whichever occurs later.

    Approved March 21, 2014.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S.J. Res. 32:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014):
            Mar. 11, considered and passed Senate.
            Mar. 13, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
#  Designation of Officers of the Office of Science and Technology Policy to Act as Director 

# Memorandum for the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy 

                    By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998, 5 U.S.C. 3345*et seq*., it is hereby ordered that:                

**Section 1.***Order of Succession.*                    Subject to the provisions of section 2 of this memorandum, the following officials of the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), in the order listed, shall act as and perform the functions and duties of the office of the Director of OSTP (Director), during any period in which the Director has died, resigned, or otherwise become unable to perform the functions and duties of the office of the Director, until such time as the Director is able to perform the functions and duties of that office:                

(a) Associate Director (National Security and International Affairs);

(b) Associate Director (Technology);

(c) Associate Director (Science); and

(d) Associate Director (Environment).

**Sec. 2.***Exceptions.*

(a) No individual who is serving in an office listed in section 1 in an acting capacity, by virtue of so serving, shall act as Director pursuant to this memorandum.

(b) No individual listed in section 1 shall act as Director unless that individual is otherwise eligible to so serve under the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998.

(c) Notwithstanding the provisions of this memorandum, the President retains the discretion, to the extent permitted by law, to depart from this memorandum in designating an acting Director.

**Sec. 3.***Revocation.*                    The President's memorandum of December 11, 2002 (Designation of Officers of the Office of Science and Technology Policy to Act as Director), is hereby revoked.                

**Sec. 4.**                     This memorandum is intended to improve the internal management of the executive branch and is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.                

**Sec. 5.**                     You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the                     *Federal Register*.                

[FR Doc. E9-19231

Billing code 3170-W9-P
#### § 25.6019-2 Returns required in case of consent under section 2513.

Except as otherwise provided in this section, the provisions of § 25.6019-1 (other than paragraph (d) of § 25.6019-1) apply with respect to the filing of a gift tax return or returns in the case of a husband and wife who consent (see § 25.2513-1) to the application of section 2513. If both spouses are (without regard to the provisions of section 2513) required under the provisions of § 25.6019-1 to file returns, returns must be filed by both spouses. If only one of the consenting spouses is (without regard to the provisions of section 2513) required under § 25.6019-1 to file a return, a return must be filed by that spouse. In the latter case if, after giving effect to the provisions of section 2513, the other spouse is considered to have made a gift not excluded from the total amount of such other spouse's gifts for the taxable year by reason of section 2503 (b) or (e) (relating, respectively, to certain gifts of $10,000 per donee and the exclusion for certain educational or medical expenses), a return must also be filed by such other spouse. Thus, if during a calendar year beginning after December 31, 1981, the first spouse made a gift of $18,000 to a child (the gift not being either a future interest in property or an amount excluded under section 2503(e)) and the other spouse made no gifts, only the first spouse is required to file a return for that calendar year. However, if the other spouse had made a gift in excess of $2,000 to the same child during the same calendar year or if the gift made by the first spouse had amounted to $21,000, each spouse would be required to file a return if the consent is signified as provided in section 2513.

[T.D. 8522, 59 FR 9664, Mar. 1, 1994]
(logo) Rialto

CAPITAL

 

 

**2018 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item1123)**

 

 

Pooling and ServicingAgreement (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement") dated as of April1, 2017 by and amongWells Fargo CommercialMortgage Securities, Inc. as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Associationas MasterServicer, Rialto CapitalAdvisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC as OperatingAdvisor andAsset RepresentationsReviewer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Certificate AdministratorandWilmington Trust, National Associationas Trustee relating to the BANK 2017-BNK4, Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates, Series 2017-BNK4 **(BANK 2017-BNK4)**

 

The undersigned, a dulyauthorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the"Special Servicer")hereincertifies to the following:

 

1.       All servicing activities and performanceof such servicing activities under the Pooling and ServicingAgreement are performed on behalf of the SpecialServicer.

 

2.       A review of the servicing activities andperformance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1, 2018to December 31, 2018 (the "Reporting Period")in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement hasbeen conducted under my supervision.

 

3.       To the best of my knowledge, based on suchreview, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligationsunder the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement,in all material respects for the Reporting Periodand if there has been a failure to fulfill any suchobligations in any material respect, each failure and thenature and status thereof has been specificallyidentified herein.

 

 

Certified by: /s/ Adam Singer

Adam Singer, Managing Director 

 

Date: March 1, 2019
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of J.Jill, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
period ending January 28, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: April 28, 2017 |  | By: |  | /s/ Paula Bennett      
|                     |  |     |  | Paula Bennett          
|                     |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer