alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>            5
<LEGEND>

This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Partnership's  unaudited  financial  statements  for the quarter ended April 30,
2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   Jul-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        Apr-30-2000
<CASH>                                    693
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                          10,713
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          769
<PP&E>                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         11,431
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      27
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                             11,404
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           11,431
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        1,710
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             430
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         1,280
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     1,280
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                            1,280
<EPS-BASIC>                              2.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                            2.29


</TABLE>
#### §§ 1.7872-1-1.7872-4 [Reserved]
IA

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 190

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to provide

that no person born in the United States will be a United States

citizen on account of birth in the United States unless both parents

are either United States citizens or aliens lawfully admitted for permanent residence at the time of the birth.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 5, 1996

Mr. BARR of Georgia introduced the following joint resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States to provide that no person born in the United

States will be a United States citizen on account of

birth in the United States unless both parents are either

United States citizens or aliens lawfully admitted for

permanent residence at the time of the birth.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the follow4 ing article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitu5 tion of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents

6 and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by
2

•HJ 190 IH

1 the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States with2 in seven years after the date of its submission for ratifica3 tion:

4 ‘‘ARTICLE—

5 ‘‘SECTION 1. No person born in the United States

6 after the date of the ratification of this article shall be

7 a citizen of the United States, or of any State, on account

8 of birth in the United States unless the mother and father

9 of the person are either citizens of the United States or

10 aliens lawfully admitted for permanent residence at the

11 time of the birth.

12 ‘‘SEC. 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce

13 this article by appropriate legislation.’’.

Æ
**FERPA’s Annual Notification of Rights Requirement (34 CFR § 99.7)**

There are approximately

20,629 school districts and postsecondary institutions affected b y these provisions. We estimate that an average of .25 hours (15 minutes) per response is required f or the annual notification of rights requirement. From administrative experience, we have determined that, at the elementary /secondary level, school districts (as opposed to individual schools) are the entities that ty picall y issue the annual notification of FERPA rights. At the postsecondary level, it is the individual institutions that issue the notice. Following is a breakdown of school districts and postsecondary institutions: No. School Districts: 14,166 Burden Hours: x .25 To tal Burden Hours = 3,541.50 No. Postsec. Inst.: 6,463 Burden Hours: x .25 Total Burden Hours = 1,615.75 School District Burden Hours: 3,541.50 Postsec. I nst. Burden Hours: + 1,615.75 Grand Total Burden Hours: 5,157.25 Since most agencies and institutions met major requirements during the early ye ars after FERPA’s passage in 1974 and after publication of the revised regulations in 1988, the y ear - to

- year cost is minimal.
IA

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 172

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating

to contributions and expenditures intended to affect elections.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 18, 1996

Mr. ENGLISH of Pennslyvania introduced the following joint resolution; which

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States relating to contributions and expenditures intended to affect elections.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the follow4 ing article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitu5 tion of the United States, to be valid only if ratified by

6 the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States with7 in seven years after the date of final passage of this joint

8 resolution:
2

•HJ 172 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE—

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. Congress shall have power to set reason3 able limits on campaign expenditures by, in support of,

4 or in opposition to, any candidate in any primary or other

5 election for Federal office.

6 ‘‘SECTION 2. The States shall have power to set rea7 sonable limits on campaign expenditures by, in support of,

8 or in opposition to, any candidate in any primary or other

9 election for State or local office.

10 ‘‘SECTION 3. Congress shall have power to implement

11 and enforce this article by appropriate legislation.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 10.2

                     WRITTEN DESCRIPTION OF LEASE AGREEMENT

LEASE  AGREEMENT  ENTERED BY AVI  FRIEDMAN,  (HEREINAFTER  "LESSOR"),  AND BY VB
TRADE, INC.  (HEREINAFTER THE "LESSEE"),  SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING  RECITALS AND
CLAUSES:

     1.- LESSOR states that:

     1.1 It is the owner of the premises at #2 Egoz Street, P.O. Box 106, Moshav
Beni Zion, Israel, 60910

     2.- LESSEE states that:

     2.1 It is a company  incorporated  according to the laws of Nevada by means
of its articles of incorporation dated July 6, 2005.

     3.- Both parties state that:

     3.1 They agree to submit  themselves  to the  provisions  contained  in the
following:

                                  C L A U S E S

FIRST.-  SUBJECT  MATTER  OF THE  LEASE.-  LESSOR  leases  to  LESSEE an area of
approximately  300 square feet located at #2 Egoz Street,  P.O. Box 106,  Moshav
Beni Zion, Israel, 60910, to carry out its business.

Likewise,  LESSOR grants the access and use to LESSEE to carry out its business,
being at LESSEE's sole cost and expense, without any responsibility for LESSOR.

SECOND.-  PRICE OF THE LEASE.-  LESSEE is not obliged to pay to LESSOR any money
per month.

THIRD.- TERM OF THE LEASE.- The term of the lease will be INDEFINITE,  any party
may  terminate  the same by giving  written  notice  to the  other  with 30 days
advance notice. The Lease will be effective as of February 1, 2007.

FOURTH.- LESSEE agrees that all permanent works and improvements  carried out in
the leased premises will remain for the benefit of LESSOR.

FIFTH.- LESSEE is obliged to maintain the leased premises and return them at the
conclusion of the lease in good  conditions  of  conservation  and  maintenance,
normal  tear and wear  excepted.  Likewise,  LESSEE  should  deliver  the leased
premises  free  of  any  claim  or  liability   whether  of  labor,   fiscal  or
administrative nature or obligations against third parties.

SIXTH.- For the  interpretation  and fulfillment of this agreement,  the parties
submit themselves to the laws and jurisdiction of Israel.
§ 48.6421-7 Records to be kept in substantiation of credits or payments. ( a ) *In general.* Every person making a claim for credit or payment under section 6421 must keep records sufficient to enable the district director to determine whether the person is entitled to credit or payment under section 6421 and, if so, the amount of the credit or payment. No particular form is prescribed for keeping the records, but the records must include a copy of any statement or document submitted with the return or claim. The records must also show with respect to the period covered by the claim— ( 1 ) The number of gallons of gasoline purchased and the dates of purchase,
( 2 ) The name and address of each vendor from whom gasoline was purchased and the total number of gallons purchased from each,
( 3 ) The number of gallons of gasoline purchased by the claimant and used during the period covered by the claim for nonhighway purposes or in intercity, local or school buses,
( 4 ) Other information as necessary to establish the correctness of the claim.
( b ) *Acceptable records.* ( 1 ) Evidence of purchases of gasoline, and the purposes for which it was used, to substantiate claims may include paid duplicate sales invoices or tickets from the gasoline dealer or other vendor, and detailed records of all fuel used which show the amount used for the prescribed purpose and the amount used for other purposes.
( 2 ) Records maintained for Federal or State income tax purposes, or to support claims for refund of a State tax on gasoline, may be used to the extent that they contain the information necessary to substantiate the accuracy of the claim for credit under section 6421. However, the records must show separately the number of gallons of gasoline used for nonhighway purposes or in intercity, local, or school buses during the period covered by the claim.
( c ) *Place and period for keeping records.* ( 1 ) All records required by this section must be kept by the claimant at a convenient and safe location within the United States which is accessible to internal revenue officers and shall during normal business hours be available for inspection by internal revenue officers. If the claimant has a principal place of business in the United States, the records must be kept at that place of business.
( 2 ) Records required to substantiate a claim under section 6421 must be maintained for a period of at least 3 years from the last date prescribed for the filing of the claim for credit or payment.
[T.D. 8043, 50 FR 32043, Aug. 8, 1985]
#### Terence Clark, Appellant, v Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[806 NYS2d 633]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), entered October 26, 2004, which denied his motion to restore the action and, in effect, to vacate any purportedly automatic dismissal of the action pursuant to CPLR 3404.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with one bill of costs, the motion is granted, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court for further proceedings, including the completion of discovery.

*511Since no note of issue was ever filed in this action, it was never on the trial calendar. In a prior order entered February 21, 2002, the Supreme Court marked the action off the “active” calendar due to discovery delays and the addition of a party defendant. In that order, the Supreme Court stated that if the action were not restored within one year, it would be “deemed dismissed” pursuant to CPLR 3404.

After the plaintiffs original attorney was suspended from the practice of law and the plaintiff retained new counsel, new counsel moved to “restore” the action and for further relief including vacating any automatic dismissal. The Supreme Court denied the motion on the ground that discovery had not been completed.

CPLR 3404 does not apply to this pre-note of issue action *(see Lopez v Imperial Delivery Serv.,*282 AD2d 190 [2001]). Further, there was no 90-day notice pursuant to CPLR 3216, and there was no order dismissing the complaint pursuant to 22 NYCRR 202.27. Accordingly, there was no basis for the court to deny the motion *(see Torres v Nu-Way Mach. Corp. Co.,*296 AD2d 545 [2002]).

We reject the defendants’ contention that the doctrine of law of the case should apply to the Supreme Court’s prior order entered February 21, 2002. The doctrine of law of the case does not apply to rulings, such as action management decisions, which are based on the discretion of the court *(see Latture v Smith,*304 AD2d 534 [2003]; *Brothers v Bunkoff Gen. Contrs.,*296 AD2d 764, 765 [2002]). In any event, this Court is not bound by the determinations of the trial court *(see Latture v Smith, supra; Keith v Schulman,*265 AD2d 380 [1999]; *Fabbricatore v Lindenhurst Union Free School Dist.,*259 AD2d 659 [1999]). Adams, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein, Skelos and Dillon, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Foued Abdallah, Also Known as Tom Cruise, Appellant.

[803 NYS2d 484]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Donald J. Wisner, J.), rendered July 8, 1996. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of murder in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of murder in the first degree (Penal Law § 125.27 [1] [a] [vii]). Defendant failed to move to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction and thus failed to preserve for our review his contention that the plea allocution is factually insufficient *(see People v Lopez,*71 NY2d 662, 665 [1988]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, this case does not fall within the narrow exception to the preservation doctrine set forth in *Lopez (see id.*at 666). Present—Kehoe, J.P., Martoche, Pine, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.
§ 1.956-1T Shareholder's pro rata share of the average of the amounts of United States property held by a controlled foreign corporation (temporary). ( a ) - ( e ) (4) [Reserved] (5) *Exclusion for certain recourse obligations.* For purposes of § 1.956-1(e)(1) of the regulations, in the case of an investment in United States property consisting of an obligation of a related person, as defined in section 954(d)(3) and paragraph (f) of § 1.954-1, a liability will not be recognized as a specific charge if the liability representing the charge is with recourse with respect to the general credit or other assets of the investing controlled foreign corporation.
( e ) (6) [Reserved] For further guidance, see § 1.956-1(e)(6).
( f ) *Effective/applicability date.* Paragraph (e)(5) of this section applies to investments made on or after June 14, 1988.
( g ) - ( h ) [Reserved]
[T.D. 9792, 81 FR 76507, Nov. 3, 2016; 81 FR 95471, Dec. 28, 2016]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer
of ACG Holdings, Inc. and American Color Graphics, Inc., collectively (the
"Company") that the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period
ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the
information contained herein fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: February 12, 2004                      /s/ Stephen M. Dyott
                                             -----------------------------------
                                                 Stephen M. Dyott
                                                 Chief Executive Officer

Date: February 12, 2004                      /s/ Patrick W. Kellick
                                             -----------------------------------
                                                 Patrick W. Kellick
                                                 Chief Financial Officer



                                       51
§ 0.104 Definitions. The following definitions are used throughout this part: ( a ) *Bureau* means: ( 1 ) Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau;
( 2 ) Bureau of Engraving and Printing;
( 3 ) Bureau of the Fiscal Service;
( 4 ) Departmental Offices;
( 5 ) Financial Crimes Enforcement Network;
( 6 ) Internal Revenue Service;
( 7 ) Office of the Comptroller of the Currency;
( 8 ) Office of the Inspector General;
( 9 ) Office of the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program;
( 10 ) Office of the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration;
( 11 ) United States Mint; and
( 12 ) Any other organization designated as a bureau by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to appropriate authority.
( b ) *Person* means an individual, corporation, company, association, firm, partnership, society, joint stock company, or any other entity, organization, or institution.
( c ) *Employee* means an officer or employee of the Department regardless of grade, status or place of employment, including an employee on leave with pay or on leave without pay. Unless stated otherwise, employee shall include a special government employee.
( d ) *Special government employee* means an officer or employee of the Department who is retained, designated, appointed, or employed, regardless of type of appointment, to perform temporary duties on a full-time or intermittent basis, with or without compensation, for not to exceed 130 days during any period of 365-consecutive days. 18 U.S.C. 202(a).
( e ) *On Department property* means present in a building, on property, or in space owned by, leased by, occupied by, or under the control of the Department.
#### William Lucadamo, Respondent, v Bridge To Life, Inc., Appellant.

[804 NYS2d 273]

In an action, inter alia, to recover misappropriated corporate funds, the defendant appeals from four orders of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Taylor, J.), dated December 17, 2003, January 23, 2004, January 23, 2004, and March 31, 2004, respectively, and a judgment of the same court entered March 12, 2004.

Ordered that the appeals are dismissed, with costs, for failure to perfect the same in accordance with the CFLR and the rules *628of this Court *(see*CPLR 5528 [a]; 5529 [b], [c]; 22 NYCRR 670.10-b [c]).

“ ‘ “An appellant who perfects an appeal by using the appendix method must file an appendix that contains all the relevant portions of the record in order to enable the court to render an informed decision on the merits of the appeal” ’ ” *(Lucadamo v Bridge To Life, Inc.,*12 AD3d 422, 422 [2004], quoting *Svoboda v Svoboda,*275 AD2d 742, 742 [2000]; *see Patel v Patel,*270 AD2d 241 [2000]). The appellant failed to provide this Court with an appendix containing copies of the motion papers, affidavits, and transcripts that are relevant to the orders and judgment appealed from. H. Miller, J.P., Luciano, Dillon and Covello, JJ., concur.
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.6223(a)-2 Withdrawal of notice of the beginning of an administrative proceeding. ( a ) *In general.* If the Internal Revenue Service, within 45 days after the day on which the notice specified in section 6223(a)(1) is mailed to the tax matters partner, decides not to propose any adjustments to the partnership return as filed, the Internal Revenue Service may withdraw the notice specified in section 6223(a)(1) by mailing a letter to that effect to the tax matters partner within that 45-day period. Even if the Internal Revenue Service does not withdraw the notice specified in section 6223(a)(1), the Internal Revenue Service is not required to issue a notice of final partnership administrative adjustment. If the Internal Revenue Service withdraws the notice specified in section 6223(a)(1), neither the Internal Revenue Service nor the tax matters partner is required to furnish any notice with respect to that proceeding to any other partner. Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, a notice specified in section 6223(a)(1) which has been withdrawn shall be treated for purposes of subchapter C of chapter 63 of the Internal Revenue Code as if that notice had never been mailed to the tax matters partner.
( b ) *Internal Revenue Service may not reissue notice except under certain circumstances.* If the notice specified in section 6223(a)(1) was mailed to the tax matters partner with respect to a partnership taxable year and that notice was later withdrawn as provided in paragraph (a) of this section, the Internal Revenue Service shall not mail a second notice specified in section 6223(a)(1) with respect to that taxable year unless— ( 1 ) There is evidence of fraud, malfeasance, collusion, concealment, or misrepresentation of a material fact;
( 2 ) The prior proceeding involved the misapplication or erroneous interpretation of an established Internal Revenue Service position existing at the time of the previous examination, or the failure to make an adjustment based on such a position; or
( 3 ) Other circumstances exist which indicate that failure to reissue the notice would be a serious administrative omission.
( c ) *Effective date.* This section is applicable to partnership taxable years beginning on or after October 4, 2001. For years beginning prior to October 4, 2001, see § 301.6223(a)-2T contained in 26 CFR part 1, revised April 1, 2001.
[T.D. 8965, 66 FR 50547, Oct. 4, 2001]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                           270,696
<SECURITIES>                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                           0
<INVENTORY>                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       0
<PP&E>                                 0
<DEPRECIATION>                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   721,873
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  0
<BONDS>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<COMMON>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                             0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     721,873
<SALES>                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               2,688,389
<CGS>                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  2,442,059
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               1,470,915
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               303,349
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (1,527,934)
<INCOME-TAX>                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                  (1,527,934)
<EPS-BASIC>                     (92.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                     (92.46)


</TABLE>