alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2019023EN.01001801.xml

| 25.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 23/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 23/18

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2019/112

of 24 January 2019

on the minimum selling price for skimmed milk powder for the 31st partial invitation to tender within the tendering procedure opened by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1),

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1240 of 18 May 2016 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to public intervention and aid for private storage (2), and in particular Article 32 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080 (3) has opened the sale of skimmed milk powder by a tendering procedure. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080 (3) has opened the sale of skimmed milk powder by a tendering procedure.

| (2) | In the light of the tenders received for the 31st partial invitation to tender, a minimum selling price should be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In the light of the tenders received for the 31st partial invitation to tender, a minimum selling price should be fixed.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 31st partial invitation to tender for the selling of skimmed milk powder within the tendering procedure opened by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080, in respect of which the period during which tenders were to be submitted ended on 22 January 2019, the minimum selling price shall be 158,50 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 January 2019.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Jerzy PLEWA

Director-General

Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 206, 30.7.2016, p. 71.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080 of 25 November 2016 opening the sale of skimmed milk powder by a tendering procedure (OJ L 321, 29.11.2016, p. 45).

3

---
IA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 22

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to require

a balanced budget.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. VOLKMER introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States to require a balanced budget.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the follow4 ing article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitu5 tion, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as

6 part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures

7 of three-fourths of the several States within seven years

8 after the date of its submission to the States for ratifica9 tion:
2

HJ 22 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE—

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. Total outlays for any fiscal year shall

3 not exceed total receipts for that fiscal year, unless three4 fifths of the whole number of each House of Congress shall

5 provide by law for a specific excess of outlays over receipts

6 by a rollcall vote.

7 ‘‘SECTION 2. The limits on the debt of the United

8 States held by the public shall not be increased, unless

9 three-fifths of the whole number of each House shall pro10 vide by law for such an increase by a rollcall vote.

11 ‘‘SECTION 3. Prior to each fiscal year, the President

12 shall transmit to the Congress a proposed budget for the

13 United States Government for that fiscal year, in which

14 total outlays do not exceed total receipts.

15 ‘‘SECTION 4. No bill to increase revenue shall become

16 law unless approved by a majority of the whole number

17 of each House by a rollcall vote.

18 ‘‘SECTION 5. The Congress may waive the provisions

19 of this article for any fiscal year in which a declaration

20 of war is in effect. The provisions of this article may be

21 waived for any fiscal year in which the United States is

22 engaged in military conflict which causes an imminent and

23 serious military threat to national security and is so de24 clared by a joint resolution, adopted by a majority of the

25 whole number of each House, which becomes law.
3

HJ 22 IH

1 ‘‘SECTION 6. The Congress shall enforce and imple2 ment this article by appropriate legislation, which may rely

3 on estimates of outlays and receipts.

4 ‘‘SECTION 7. Total receipts shall include all receipts

5 of the United States Government except for those for re6 payment of debt principal.

7 ‘‘SECTION 8. This article shall take effect beginning

8 with fiscal year 2001 or with the second fiscal year begin9 ning after its ratification, whichever is later.’’.

Æ
39563.

#### JOHNSTON v. BOSTON-OLD COLONY INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

Bell, Judge.

The testimony of a physician who examined and treated the- claimant Was that she had an arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease and that he knew of no evidence to indicate that exercise or exertion caused the disease. This evidence justified the board in finding that there was no evidence of exertion which caused thé condition from which the claimant is suffering; that she did not sustain an accidental injury arising out of'an'd in the course-of her employment; and in denying compensation. The statute excludes disease- in any form, except as otherwise provided, unless the disease results naturally and unavoidably from the accident. *Code Ann.*§ 114-102. ■

Neither the occupational disease statute nor any other provision of the Workmen’s Compensation Act includes- disability resulting from the disease the claimant here has, which was not produced or aggravated by the employment.

The board was authorized to find that the claimant at the time of her purported accident had arteriosclerotic heart disease which had developed slowly over the years to a point where it was detrimental to her to engage in work which entailed enough exertion to cause angina pectoris, or pains in the chest and arms, and that since the exertion did not cause damage to the heart which caused the disability there was no accidental injury under the law. The fact.that the exertion required by the job caused the employee pain does not constitute an accidental injury. The legal cause of the pain in such a case is the physical condition of the employee and not the exertion on the job. This case is not like the cases where exertion on the job causes heart damage which incapacitates the employee. Here there is no heart damage except from disease. Pain suffered by an employee because he engages in an occupation which he is physically unable to perform is not an accidental- injury. Where there is no causal relation between the accidental injury and the disability, cases such as *Davis v. Bibb Mfg. Co., 75*Ga. App. 515, 518 (43 SE2d 780), are neither applicable nor controlling.

The superior court properly affirmed the denial of compensation by the State Board of Workmen’s Compensation.

*411Decided July 16, 1962

Rehearing denied July 26, 1962.

*Smith, Field, Ringel, Martin •& Carr, Charles L. Drew, Charles H. Edwards,*for plaintiff in error.

*Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Mtorphy, Frank Love, Jr.,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Felton, C. J:, and Hall, J., concur.*
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent ,

v. JESSE JAMES ABBOTT , Petitioner

. N o . 1 CA

- CR 1 9

- 0164 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Mohave County

No. S8015CR201501152 The Honorable Richard D. Lambert , Judge
REVIEW GRANTED; RELI EF DENIED

COUNSEL
Mohave C ounty Attorney’s Office, Kingman By Matthew J. Smith Counsel for Respondent
The Stavris Law Firm, P

. L

. L

. C

. , Scottsdale By Alison Stavris Counsel for Petitioner FILED 10-31-2019STATE v. ABBOTT D ecision of the Court

2 MEMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge Kenton D. Jones, Judge James B. Morse Jr. , and Judge Diane M. Johnsen delivered the decision of the Court.

P E R C U R I A M : ¶1 Jesse Abbott seeks review of the superior court’s order dismissing his petition for post

- conviction relief (PCR) , filed pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is the petitioner’s first PCR petition

. ¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this Court will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post

- conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 576

- 77, ¶ 19 (2012). It is the petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion in denying the petition. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 2011). ¶3 We have reviewed the record i n this matter, the superior court’s order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief, and the pe tition for review. We find that the petitioner has not shown any abuse of discretion. ¶4 Accordingly, we grant review and deny relief.
#### § 101.5 Payment of smelting costs.

The petitioner shall be required to pay all reasonable costs incurred in extracting the bullion from the counterfeit coins, as shall be determined by the Assistant Secretary. Payment must be made prior to the return of the gold bullion to the petitioner.
§ 53.6081-1 Automatic extension of time for filing the return to report taxes due under section 4951 for self-dealing with a nuclear decommissioning fund. ( a ) *In general.* A “disqualified person” for purposes of section 4951(e)(4) who engaged in self-dealing with a Nuclear Decommissioning Fund, and must report tax due under section 4951 on Form 1120-ND, “Return for Nuclear Decommissioning Funds and Certain Related Persons,” will be allowed an automatic 6-month extension of time to file the return after the date prescribed for filing the return if the disqualified person files an application under this section in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section. For guidance on requesting an extension of time to file Form 1120-ND for purposes of reporting contributions received, income earned, administrative expenses of operating the fund, and the tax on modified gross income, see § 1.6081-3 of this chapter.
( b ) *Requirements.* To satisfy this paragraph (b), a disqualified person must— ( 1 ) Submit a complete application on Form 7004, “Application for Automatic Extension of Time to File Certain Business Income Tax, Information, and Other Returns,” or in any other manner prescribed by the Commissioner;
( 2 ) File the application on or before the date prescribed for filing the return with the Internal Revenue Service office designated in the application's instructions; and
( 3 ) Remit the amount of the properly estimated unpaid tax liability on or before the date prescribed for payment.
( c ) *No extension of time for the payment of tax.* An automatic extension of time for filing a return granted under paragraph (a) of this section will not extend the time for payment of any tax due on such return.
( d ) *Termination of automatic extension.* The Commissioner may terminate an automatic extension at any time by mailing to the disqualified person a notice of termination at least 10 days prior to the termination date designated in such notice. The Commissioner must mail the notice of termination to the address shown on the Form 7004 or to the disqualified person's last known address. For further guidance regarding the definition of last known address, see § 301.6212-2 of this chapter.
( e ) *Penalties.* See section 6651 for failure to file or failure to pay the amount shown as tax on the return.
( f ) *Effective/applicability dates.* This section is applicable for applications for an automatic extension of time to file a return to report taxes due under section 4951 for self-dealing with a Nuclear Decommissioning Fund filed after July 1, 2008.
[T.D. 9407, 73 FR 37369, July 1, 2008]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6731
MARTINA VAN HOEF, Petitioner - Appellant, versus U.S. IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-04-76) Submitted: September 16, 2004 Decided: September 28, 2004 Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Martina Van Hoef, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Martina Van Hoef seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint which the district court construed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. SeeVan Hoef v. U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement , No. CA-04-76 (E.D. Va. Mar. 23, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### In the Matter of Maeghan Mc. Nassau County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Marguerite Mc. et al., Appellants.

[803 NYS2d 443]

In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the parents appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Nassau County (Balkin, J), dated May 11, 2004, as, after a hearing, found the subject child to be educationally neglected.

Ordered that the order of fact-finding and disposition is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The petitioner met its burden of establishing educational neglect by a preponderance of the evidence *(see Matter of Nicole A.,*305 AD2d 1039 [2003]; *Matter of Fatima A.,*276 AD2d 791 [2000]).

The appellants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Florio, J.P., Goldstein, Fisher and Covello, JJ., concur.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Wells Fargo CommercialMortgage Securities, Inc.

375 PARK AVE FL 2

Wells Fargo Securities, LLC

NEW YORK, New York 10152-0002

 

 

Re: Annual Statement of Compliancefor Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust 2016-C37, Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-C37

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of December 1, 2016 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go  far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
§ 41.6694-2 Penalties for understatement due to an unreasonable position. ( a ) *In general.* A person who is a tax return preparer of any return or claim for refund of excise tax under section 4481 shall be subject to penalties under section 6694(a) in the manner stated in § 1.6694-2 of this chapter.
( b ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section is applicable to returns and claims for refund filed, and advice provided, after December 31, 2008.
[T.D. 9436, 73 FR 78456, Dec. 22, 2008]
0\••FlictorVISIDnAbove&beyondU.S.DepartmentofTransportationDocketManagementSystem1200NewJerseyAve.,SEWashington,DC20590September24.2015Re:AmendmenttoExemption11067issuedpursuanttoSection333oftheFAAReformActandPartIIoftheFederalAviationRegulationsinRegulatoryDocketNo.FAA-2014-0357.DearSirorMadam;PictorvisionInc.wasissuedanExemptionnumberedII067(hereinaftertheExemption)forthepurposeofconductingscripted,closed-setfilmingforthemotionpictureandtelevisionindustry.PictorvisionInc.herbyrequestsanamendmenttotheExemptiontoallow3additionalmodelsofunmannedaircraftsystem(UAS)thatfullycomplieswiththeconditionsoftheExemption.PictorvisionInc.wishestooperatethreeadditionalvariationsofthesUAS(modelsFreeflyAlta,DJIInspireI,and3DRSolo)underthesametermsandconditionscontainedintheExemption.Attachedhereto,andsubmittedasaconfidentialdocument.istheFlightOperationsandProceduresManual(FOPM)fortheadditionalUAS.AlloperationsoftheadditionalUASwillbeinfullcompliancewiththetermsoftheExemption.Asthisisanamendmenttoanexistingexemptionaskingfortheadditionof3similarmodelsofunmannedaerialvehicle,PictorvisionInc.respectfullysubmitsthatgoodcauseexistssothatnoticedoesnotneedtobepublishedintheFederalRegisterfortherequestedamendment.PleasecontacttheundersignedshouldyouhaveanyquestionconcerningthisrequestforanamendmenttotheExemption.TomHallmanPresidentPictorvisionInc818-785-9282cc:RobertPappasJakeTroutman16238RaymerStreet,VanNuys,Calilotnia91406P:81878S.IJ282F.818.785.9787www.Pictorvision.com
§ 48.6715-1 Penalty for misuse of dyed fuel. ( a ) *In general.* If any person willfully alters, or attempts to alter, the strength or composition of any dye or marking done pursuant to § 48.4082-1 in any dyed fuel, then section 6715(a)(3) provides that such person shall pay a penalty in addition to any tax. The penalty imposed by section 6715(a)(3) will not apply in the following cases: ( 1 ) Diesel fuel or kerosene that satisfies the dyeing and marking requirements of § 48.4082-1 (b) and (c) is blended with any undyed liquid and the resulting product satisfies the dyeing and marking requirements of § 48.4082-1 (b) and (c).
( 2 ) Diesel fuel or kerosene that satisfies the dyeing and marking requirements of § 48.4082-1 (b) and (c) is blended with any other liquid (other than diesel fuel or kerosene) that contains the type and amount of dye and marker required for diesel fuel or kerosene dyed and marked in accordance with § 48.4082-1 (b) and (c).
( 3 ) The alteration or attempted alteration occurs in an exempt area of Alaska after September 30, 1996.
( 4 ) Diesel fuel or kerosene that does not satisfy the dyeing and marking requirements of § 48.4082-1 (b) and (c) is blended with diesel fuel or kerosene that satisfies the dyeing and marking requirements of § 48.4082-1 (b) and (c) and the blending occurs as part of a use described in § 48.4082-4(c) or § 48.6427-8(b)(1)(vii)(C) or (D).
( b ) *Effective date.* This section is effective January 1, 1994.
[T.D. 8659, 61 FR 10465, Mar. 14, 1996, as amended by T.D. 8685, 61 FR 58007, Nov. 12, 1996; T.D. 8748, 63 FR 26, Jan. 2, 1998; T.D. 8879, 65 FR 17163, Mar. 31, 2000]
IA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 134

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1996, and for

other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 20, 1995

Mr. LIVINGSTON introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Appropriations

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

1996, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the following sums are hereby appropriated, out of

4 any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated,

5 and out of applicable corporate or other revenues, receipts,

6 and funds, for the several departments, agencies, corpora7 tions and other organizational units of Government for the

8 fiscal year 1996, and for other purposes, namely:
2

HJ 134 IH

1 SEC. 101. ENSURED PAYMENT DURING FISCAL YEAR 1996

2 OF VETERANS’ BENEFITS IN EVENT OF LACK

3 OF APPROPRIATIONS.

4 (a) PAYMENTS REQUIRED.—In any case during fiscal

5 year 1996 in which appropriations are not otherwise avail6 able for programs, projects, and activities of the Depart7 ment of Veterans Affairs, the Secretary of Veterans Af8 fairs shall nevertheless ensure that—

9 (1) payments of existing veterans benefits are

10 made in accordance with regular procedures and

11 schedules and in accordance with eligibility require12 ments for such benefits; and

13 (2) payments to contractors of the Veterans

14 Health Administration of the Department of Veter15 ans Affairs are made when due in the case of serv16 ices provided that directly relate to patient health

17 and safety.

18 (b) FUNDING.—There is hereby appropriated such

19 sums as may be necessary for the payments pursuant to

20 subsection (a), including such amounts as may be nec21 essary for the costs of administration of such payments.

22 (c) CHARGING OF ACCOUNTS WHEN APPROPRIA23 TIONS MADE.—In any case in which the Secretary uses

24 the authority of subsection (a) to make payments, applica25 ble accounts shall be charged for amounts so paid, and

26 for the costs of administration of such payments, when
3

HJ 134 IH

1 regular appropriations become available for those pur2 poses.

3 (d) EXISTING BENEFITS SPECIFIED.—For purposes

4 of this section, existing veterans benefits are benefits

5 under laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Af6 fairs that have been adjudicated and authorized for pay7 ment as of—

8 (1) December 15, 1995; or

9 (2) if appropriations for such benefits are avail10 able (other than pursuant to subsection (b)) after

11 December 15, 1995, the last day on which appro12 priations for payment of such benefits are available

13 (other than pursuant to subsection (b)).

Æ