alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 44.4402-1 Exemptions. ( a ) *Parimutuel wagering enterprises.* Section 4402 provides that no tax shall be imposed by section 4401 on any wager placed with, or on any wager placed in a wagering pool conducted by, a parimutuel wagering enterprise licensed under State law.
( b ) *Wagering machines* — ( 1 ) *In general.* Section 4402 provides that no tax shall be imposed by section 4401 on any wager placed in a coin-operated device (as defined in section 4462 as in effect for years beginning before July 1, 1980), or on any amount paid, in lieu of inserting a coin, token, or similar object, to operate a device described in section 4462(a)(2) (as so in effect). These devices include: ( i ) So-called “slot” machines that operate by means of the insertion of a coin, token, or similar object and that, by application of the element of chance, may deliver, or entitle the person playing or operating the machine to receive cash, premiums, merchandise, or tokens; and
( ii ) Machines that are similar to machines described in paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section and are operated without the insertion of a coin, token, or similar object.
( 2 ) *Examples.* The following devices and machines are examples of the devices referred to in paragraph (b)(1) of this section: ( i ) A machine that is operated by means of the insertion of a coin, token, or similar object and that, even though it does not dispense cash or tokens, has the features and characteristics of a gaming device whether or not evidence exists as to actual payoffs.
( ii ) A so-called crane machine, claw, digger, or rotary merchandising type device that is operated by the insertion of a coin and adjustment of a control lever for the purpose or removing from the machine, by gripping, pushing, or other manipulation articles such as figurines, lighters, etc., in the machine.
( iii ) A pinball machine equipped with a pushbutton for releasing free plays and a meter for recording the plays so released, or equipped with provisions for multiple coin insertion for increasing the odds.
( iv ) Pinball machines in connection with which free plays are redeemed in cash, tokens, or merchandise, or prizes are offered to any person for the attainment of designated scores.
( v ) A coin-operated machine that displays a poker hand or delivers a ticket with a poker hand symbolized on it that entitles the player to a prize if the poker hand displayed by the machine or symbolized on the ticket constitutes a winning hand.
[T.D. 8328, 56 FR 188, Jan. 3, 1991; Redesignated and amended by T.D. 8442, 57 FR 48186, Oct. 22, 1992]
IB

House Calendar No. 55

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1070

[Report No. 104–134]

To designate the reservoir created by Trinity Dam in the Central Valley

project, California, as ‘‘Trinity Lake’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 28, 1995

Mr. HERGER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

JUNE 7, 1995

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To designate the reservoir created by Trinity Dam in the

Central Valley project, California, as ‘‘Trinity Lake’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF TRINITY LAKE.

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The reservoir created by Trinity

5 Dam in the Central Valley project, California, and des-
2

•HR 1070 PCH

1 ignated as ‘‘Clair Engle Lake’’ by Public Law 88–662 (78

2 Stat. 1093) is hereby redesignated as ‘‘Trinity Lake’’.

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, regula4 tion, document, record, map, or other paper of the United

5 States to the reservoir referred to in subsection (a) shall

6 be considered to be a reference to ‘‘Trinity Lake’’.

7 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Public Law 88–662

8 (78 Stat. 1093) is repealed.

House Calendar No. 55

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1070

[Report No. 104–134]

A BILL

To designate the reservoir created by Trinity Dam

‘‘Trinity Lake’’.in the Central Valley project, California, as

JUNE 7, 1995

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
IA

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 177

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States authorizing

the Congress and the States to prohibit the physical desecration of

the flag of the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 30, 1996

Mr. MCDADE introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States authorizing the Congress and the States to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United

States.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several
2

•HJ 177 IH

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission

2 for ratification:

3 ‘‘ARTICLE—

4 ‘‘The Congress and the States shall have power to

5 prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United

6 States.’’.

Æ
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George Wilson MCGRAW, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George Wilson McGraw, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 01-4516, 01-4517.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 31, 2002.

Decided June 20, 2002.

*687Tracy Weese, Shepherdstown, West Virginia, for Appellant. Kasey Warner, United States Attorney, Samuel D. Marsh, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

George Wilson McGraw appeals the district court’s revocation of his supervised release and related imposition of a twelvemonth sentence. McGraw claims that there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that he violated a condition of his supervised release and that the district court erred in failing to specify in its order which state law McGraw violated. We review these challenges for abuse of discretion. *United States v. Copley,*978 F.2d 829, 831 (4th Cir.1992). After carefully reviewing the record and the district court’s order, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion.

The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the Government, proved that McGraw placed a telephone call to his ex-wife, Rebecca McCoy, reminding her of his prior threat to return from prison and kill her. McCoy felt sufficiently threatened to call the police to report the threat and request protection. The district court explicitly stated that the issue amounted to a credibility determination and credited the testimony of McCoy and the Government witnesses over McGraw and his witnesses. Because the decision rests upon the district court’s credibility determination, its decision may not be disturbed. *United States v. Saunders,*886 F.2d 56, 60 (4th Cir.1989).

We also conclude that the district court did not err by referencing the violation alleged in the petition for revocation of supervised release instead of reciting the specific violation of state law alleged.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1039 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1039

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the estate and 
        gift taxes and the tax on generation-skipping transfers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 24, 1995

    Mr. Crane (for himself, Mr. Blute, Mr. McKeon, and Mr. Hancock) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the estate and 
        gift taxes and the tax on generation-skipping transfers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That (a) chapter 11 of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to estate tax) is hereby 
repealed.
    (b) Chapter 12 of such Code (relating to gift tax) is hereby 
repealed.
    (c) Chapter 13 of such Code (relating to tax on generation-skipping 
transfers) is hereby repealed.
    (d)(1) The repeal made by subsection (a) shall apply to the estates 
of decedents dying after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (2) The repeals made by subsections (b) and (c) shall apply with 
respect to transfers made after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

February 6, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

135007 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,
Justices

v SC: 135007 COA: 277736 Wayne CC: 05-005879-01 ANTHONY TYRONE SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 30, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND th is case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted, of: (1) whether the circuit court erred in admitting the testimony of Latrice Lewis un der MRE 404(b); (2) whether the error in admitting the testimony, if any, was reversible; (3) whet her the testimony was admissible under MCL 768.27a; and (4) whether the prosecution’s fa ilure to rely on MCL 768.27a precludes sustaining its admission ba sed on that provision.

s0130 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 6, 2008

Clerk
Exhibit 35.9  LOGO ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE OF LNR PARTNERS, LLC The
undersigned, Job Warshaw, being the President of LNR Partners, LLC (the Special Servicer), as special servicer under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the transactions listed on Schedule Ihereto, hereby
certifies, subject to any limitations listed on Schedule Ihereto, as of the date hereof, on behalf of the Special Servicer, solely in his capacity as an authorized officer of the Special Servicer and not in his individual capacity, as
follows:  1.
A review of the activities performed by the Special Servicer during the period commencing on January 1, 2018
and ending on December 31, 2018 (or any other shorter period set forth on Schedule Ihereto) (the Reporting Period), and of the Special Servicers performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my
supervision; and  2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review and using the applicable servicing criteria under Item 1122
of Regulation AB, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.  LNR PARTNERS, LLC, a Florida
limited liability companyBy:

\s\ Job WarshawJob WarshawPresident
 Dated: February 19, 2019    1601 Washington Avenue ● Suite 700 ● Miami Beach, Florida 33139-3164 Telephone: (305) 695-5600 ● Fax: (305) 695-5601




---

Schedule I CGCMT 2016-P5 Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2016-P5, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-P5 Citibank,N.A., Global Transaction Services 388 Greenwich Street, 14th Floor New York NY 10013 John Hannon Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc. 390 Greenwich
Street, 5th Floor New York NY 10013 Paul Vanderslice Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc. 388 Greenwich
Street, 19th Floor New York NY 10013 Richard Simpson Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc. 388 Greenwich
Street, 17th Floor New York NY 10013 Ryan M. OConnor Park Bridge Lender Services LLC 600 Third Avenue, 40th
Floor Att: CGCMT 2016-P5 New York NY 10016 Park Bridge Lender Services LLC 600 Third Avenue, 40th Floor New York NY 10016 Group Notices Park Bridge Lender Services LLC 600 Third Avenue, 40th Floor New York NY 10016 David Rogers
§ 56.4911-1 Tax on excess lobbying expenditures. ( a ) *In general.* Section 4911(a) imposes an excise tax of 25 percent on the excess lobbying expenditures (as defined in paragraph (b) of this section) for a taxable year of an organization for which the expenditure test election under section 501(h) is in effect (an “electing public charity”). An electing public charity's annual limit on expenditures for influencing legislation (*i.e.*, the amount of lobbying expenditures on which no tax is due) is the lobbying nontaxable amount or, on expenditures for influencing legislation through grass roots lobbying, the grass roots nontaxable amount (see paragraph (c) of this section). For rules concerning the application of the excise tax imposed by section 4911(a) to the members of an affiliated group of organizations (as defined in § 56.4911-7(e)), see § 56.4911-8.
( b ) *Excess lobbying expenditures.* For any taxable year for which the expenditure test election under section 501(h) is in effect, the amount of an electing public charity's excess lobbying expenditures is the greater of— ( 1 ) The amount by which the organization's lobbying expenditures (within the meaning of § 56.4911-2(a)) exceed the organization's lobbying nontaxable amount, or
( 2 ) The amount by which the organization's grass roots expenditures (within the meaning of §§ 56.4911-2(a)) exceed the organization's grass roots nontaxable amount.
( c ) *Nontaxable amounts* — ( 1 ) *Lobbying nontaxable amount.* Under section 4911(c)(2), the lobbying nontaxable amount for any taxable year for which the expenditure test election is in effect is the lesser of— ( i ) $1,000,000, or
( ii ) To the extent of the electing public charity's exempt purpose expenditures (within the meaning of § 56.4911-4) for that year, the sum of 20 percent of the first $500,000 of such expenditures, plus 15 percent of the second $500,000 of such expenditures, plus 10 percent of the third $500,000 of such expenditures, plus 5 percent of the remainder of such expenditures.
( 2 ) *Grass roots nontaxable amount.* Under section 4911(c)(4), an electing public charity's grass roots nontaxable amount for any taxable year is 25 percent of its lobbying nontaxable amount for that year.
( d ) *Examples.* The provisions of this section are illustrated by the examples in § 1.501(h)-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         168,379
<SECURITIES>                                   632,912
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       6,440,912
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,242,094
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,141
<BONDS>                                        544,637
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,687,175
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,242,094
<SALES>                                      1,805,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               236,097
<CGS>                                        1,407,343
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,570,890
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                43,712
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                192,385
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            192,385
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   192,385
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    30.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 18 (Thursday, January 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 5207]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1935]



[[Page 5207]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Delegation of Authority No. 321]


Re-Delegation From the Deputy Secretary of State of Certain 
Authorities Vested in the Under Secretary for Arms Control and 
International Security

    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of State by the 
laws of the United States, including the Foreign Assistance Act of 
1961, the Arms Export Control Act, the Foreign Affairs Reform and 
Restructuring Act of 1998, and Section 1 of the State Department Basic 
Authorities Act (22 U.S.C. 2651a), and delegated to me by Delegation of 
Authority 245, dated April 23, 2001, I hereby delegate to Stephen D. 
Mull of the Office of the Under Secretary for Political Affairs, to the 
extent authorized by law, all authorities vested in the Under Secretary 
of State for Arms Control and International Security, including all 
authorities vested in the Secretary of State that have been or may be 
delegated or redelegated to that Under Secretary.
    Any authorities covered by this delegation are also hereby 
delegated to the Deputy Secretary for Management and Resources, the 
Under Secretary for Political Affairs and the Under Secretary for 
Management, and may also be exercised by the Secretary and the Deputy 
Secretary. Nothing in this delegation of authority shall be deemed to 
supersede any existing delegation of authority, which shall remain in 
full force and effect during and after this delegation.
    This delegation shall become effective at noon on January 20, 2009, 
and shall expire upon the appointment and entry upon duty of a 
subsequently appointed individual to serve as Under Secretary of State 
for Arms Control and International Security.
    This memorandum shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: January 16, 2009.
John D. Negroponte,
Deputy Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. E9-1935 Filed 1-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1006 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1006

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide housing benefits for 
        the purchase of residential cooperative apartment units.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 21, 1995

Mrs. Maloney (for herself, Mr. Davis, Mr. Rangel, Mr. Doyle, Mr. Frost, 
and Mr. Ackerman) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide housing benefits for 
        the purchase of residential cooperative apartment units.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Housing Fairness Act''.

SEC. 2. RESIDENTIAL COOPERATIVE HOUSING UNITS.

    (a) Loans.--Section 3710(a) of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(12) To purchase residential property in a development, 
        project, or structure of a cooperative housing corporation if 
        the development, project, or structure is approved by the 
        Secretary under criteria which the Secretary shall prescribe by 
        regulations.''.
    (b) Definition.--Section 3701(b) of such title is amended by adding 
at the end thereof the following:
            ``(6)(A) The term `residential property' includes stock or 
        membership in a cooperative housing corporation (as defined in 
        section 216 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986) the permanent 
        occupancy of the dwelling units of which is restricted to 
        members of such corporation where the purchase of such stock or 
        membership will entitle the purchaser to the permanent 
        occupancy of one of such units.
            ``(B) For the purposes of subparagraph (A)--
                    ``(i) the term `cooperative housing corporation' 
                has the same meaning given such term by section 216 of 
                the Internal Revenue Code of 1986;
                    ``(ii) the term `property' includes the dwelling 
                unit in such a cooperative; and
                    ``(iii) the term `value of the property' includes 
                the appraised value of the dwelling unit in the 
                cooperative housing corporation.''.
                                 <all>
```
www.gpo.gov

### §451. Donations for Indians; use of gifts; annual report to Congress

The Secretary of the Interior may accept donations of funds or other property for the advancement of the Indian race, and he may use the donated property in accordance with the terms of the donation in furtherance of any program authorized by other provision of law for the benefit of Indians. An annual report shall be made to the Congress on donations received and allocations made from such donations. This report shall include administrative costs and other pertinent data.

(Feb. 14, 1931, ch. 171, 46 Stat. 1106; Pub. L. 90–333, June 8, 1968, 82 Stat. 171.)

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Johnson-O'Malley Act which comprises this part, nor as part of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act which comprises this subchapter.

#### Amendments

1968—Pub. L. 90–333 expanded area of permissible uses to which Secretary may put donated property by substituting provisions allowing inclusion of programs otherwise authorized by law intended to benefit Indians for provisions limiting permissible uses to programs otherwise authorized by law only if it could be shown that property would benefit a particular Indian institution or individual, and inserted provisions for an annual report to Congress on donations received and allocations made from such donations.

#### Cross References

Deposit of funds received in Treasury as trust funds, see section 1321 of Title 31, Money and Finance.

#### Section Referred to in Other Sections

This section is referred to in title 22 section 2124c.