alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Properties III
L.P. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, David Salzman, Chief Executive Officer of Richman Housing Credits
Inc., general partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties III L.P., general partner
of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant
to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrant.


/s/ David Salzman
---------------------------------------
David Salzman
Chief Executive Officer of
Richman Housing Credits Inc.,
general partner of
Richman Tax Credit Properties III L.P.,
General Partner of the Registrant
February 13, 2006
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

ADRIAN AGUILAR-RIVERA,

a.k.a. Julio Cesar Castaneda,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-50560

D.C. No. 3:10-cr-02273-H

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Marilyn L. Huff, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 2, 2011** 

Before: RYMER, IKUTA, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Adrian Aguilar-Rivera appeals from the 30-month sentence imposed

following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found in the United

States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

FILED

AUG 11 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-50560

§ 1291 and we affirm in part, vacate in part and remand for resentencing.

Aguilar-Rivera first contends the district court erred in holding that his prior

conviction for grand theft, in violation of California Penal Code § 487(a), qualified

as an aggravated felony under the modified-categorical approach. Aguilar-Rivera

is correct; the record before the district court does not establish Aguilar-Rivera

admitted to all of the elements of generic theft. See United States v. Vidal, 504

F.3d 1072, 1086 (9th Cir. 2007) (en banc) (“A prior conviction based on an overly

inclusive criminal statute that resulted from a guilty plea rather than a jury verdict

will support a sentence enhancement only if the record confirms that the plea

necessarily rested on the fact identifying the [offense] as generic.”) (internal

quotation marks omitted) (quoting Shepard v. United States, 544 U.S. 13, 21

(2005)); Carrillo-Jaime v. Holder, 572 F.3d 747, 751 (9th Cir. 2009).

Aguilar-Rivera’s contention concerning Almendarez-Torres is foreclosed. 

See United States v. Valdovinos-Mendez, 641 F.3d 1031, 1036 (9th Cir. 2011).

As the government has not met its burden of demonstrating that AguilarRivera’s § 487(a) conviction qualified as an aggravated felony, we vacate the

sentence and remand for resentencing. See United States v. Matthews, 278 F.3d

880, 885-86 (9th Cir. 2002) (en banc).

AFFIRMED in part; VACATED in part; and REMANDED.
Exhibit No. 32.1
Form 10-QSB
Universal Express, Inc.
File No. 0-18094



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Express, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
Altomare, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: May 21, 2007                       By:  /s/ Richard Altomare
                                               --------------------------
                                               Richard Altomare
                                                 Chief Executive Officer and
                                                 Chief Accounting Officer


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
~t....... 

STATE OF MISSOURI Jeremiah W (Jay) Nixon, Governor • Sara Parker Pauley, Director 

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 


www.dnr.mo.gov 

April 19, 2016 

Mr. Mark Hague 

Acting Regional Administrator 

U.S. EPA, Region VII 

11201 Renner Boulevard 

Lenexa, KS 66219 

Re: Missouri Department ofNatural Resources' (department) Response to U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) proposed area designations 

Dear Mr. Hague: 

This letter and attached enhanced technical analysis is in response to EPA's February 16, 

2016 letter and Technical Support Document (TSD) titled "Missouri Area Designations for 

the 2010 S02 Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standard." EPA's letter served as 

notification to the state that EPA intends to modify Missouri's original recomn1endation. 

This letter and attachments reaffirm and supplement our previously submitted 

recommendations dated September 25,2015. The enclosed technical analysis provides 

detailed information that supports Missouri's original recommendation as well as addresses 

the concerns and issues raised by EPA in the received letter and TSD. Missouri's 

supplemental technical support documentation is contained in Attachment 1. 

The table below summarizes our area recommendations for the July 2, 2016 round of 

designations. 

lssoun'A rea R ecommend a'lons f b or th e 2010 1 h - our SO 2 S d J I tan d ar : uy 2016 D eSlgnatlons . 

Area Designation Affected Area Recommended Boundary Recommendations 

Sikeston All of Scott County Attainment 

Sibley Portion ofJackson County Attainment 

Labadie N/A Unclassifiable 

o Rl"',Hlrd I'"p(-r 
Mr. Mark Hague 

Page Two 

Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have any questions regarding this 

submittal, please contact Ms. Darcy Bybee with the Missouri Department of Natural 

Resources' Air Pollution Control Program at P.o. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102 or by 

telephone at (573) 751-4817. 

Sincerely, 

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAM 

Kyra L. Moore 

Director 

KLM:akc 

Enclosures: 

Attachments 1-3 

Electronic copy of the letter and attachments 

c: Missouri Air Conservation Commission 

Project# 201 0-SOr4 Consent Decree
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Re:          Annual Statement of Compliance for CSAIL 2016-C7 Commercial Mortgage Trust,Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-C7

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of November 1, 2016 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a)           A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of itsperformance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision;and

 

(b)          To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
Amendment No. 2 to the 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Directors


 Exhibit 10.2 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 TO THE 2006 LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN FOR 
 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS OF THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. 
 WHEREAS, The Cooper Companies, Inc. (the “Company”) has adopted the 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Directors of the Cooper Companies, Inc. (the “Plan”); and 
 WHEREAS, Section 11 of the Plan permits the Board of Directors of the Company to amend the Plan, subject to certain limitations; and

 WHEREAS, the Board of the Company desires to amend the Plan to provide minimum vesting periods for restricted stock awards;

 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 
 FIRST: By substituting the following for Section 6(d) of the Plan: 
 “(d) Removal of
Restrictions. Subject to the provisions of paragraph (f) of this Section 6, restrictions imposed under subsection (c) hereof upon Restricted Stock Grants and the underlying Restricted Stock shall lapse, and the Restricted Stock
underlying a particular Restricted Stock Grant shall become nonforfeitable and freely transferable as follows: 
 Restrictions
on Restricted Stock purchased pursuant to each Annual Restricted Stock Grant or Mid-Year Restricted Stock Grant shall be removed upon the earlier to occur of the following after the date of grant: (a) the date the Average Closing Price equals
or exceeds 10% over the Fair Market Value of the Stock on the date of grant; provided, that if such event occurs prior to the first anniversary of the date of grant, that such restrictions shall not be removed until the first anniversary of the date
of grant, or (b) five years.” 
 SECOND: The provisions of the First Paragraph hereof shall be effective March 5, 2007.

 THIRD: Except to the extent herein above set forth, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of Directors of the Company has caused this Amendment to the Plan to be executed by a duly authorized officer of the
Company as of March 5, 2007. 
  

			
	 	 	THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Carol R. Kaufman

		 	Carol R. Kaufman
	Title:	 	Senior Vice President of Legal Affairs, Secretary and Chief Administrative Officer
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

ReferenceisherebymadetothatcertainPooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2016, by and amongWELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGOBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asGeneralMaster Servicer, C-III ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, as General Special Servicer,NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BANK, N.A., as NCB Master Servicer and as NCB SpecialServicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator,WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee and PARK BRIDGE LENDERSERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and as Asset Representations Reviewer withrespect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2016-C36 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 of this Agreement,I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services dohereby certify that:

 

1.A review of the activities of the General Master Servicer during the periodfrom January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and ofits performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision,and

 

2.To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the General Master Servicerhas fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all materialrespects throughout the ReportingPeriod.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasexecuted this Certificate as of the 28th day ofFebruary2018.

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells  Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       5,643,919
<SECURITIES>                                10,666,605
<RECEIVABLES>                                  259,186
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,208,632
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,319,268
<PP&E>                                       8,898,184
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,319,797
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,806,252
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,467,298
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    82,705,340
<OTHER-SE>                                  59,499,662
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,806,252
<SALES>                                         82,570
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,560,084
<CGS>                                           31,221
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,189,405
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,629,321)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,629,321)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,629,321)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.27)
<FN>
<F1> THIS REPRESENTS DEFICIT ACCUMULATED DURING DEVELOPMENT STAGE.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.6503(b)-1 Suspension of running of period of limitation; assets of taxpayer in control or custody of court.

Where all or substantially all of the assets of a taxpayer are in the control or custody of the court in any proceeding before any court of the United States, or of any State of the United States, or of the District of Columbia, the period of limitations on collection after assessment prescribed in section 6502 is suspended with respect to the outstanding amount due on the assessment for the period such assets are in the control or custody of the court, and for 6 months thereafter. In the case of an estate of a decedent or an incompetent, the period of limitations on collection is suspended only for periods beginning after November 2, 1966, during which assets are in the control or custody of a court, and for 6 months thereafter.

[T.D. 7121, 36 FR 10782, June 3, 1971]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 163 Received in Senate (RDS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 163

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               March 14 (legislative day, March 13), 1996

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1996, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 104-99 is 
amended by striking out ``March 15, 1996'' in sections 106(c), 112, 
126(c), 202(c) 
and 214 and inserting in lieu thereof ``March 22, 1996'', and by 
inserting in section 101(a) after ``The Department of the Interior and 
Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1996'' the following ``, H.R. 
1977'', and by inserting in section 101(a) after ``The Departments of 
Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education and Related Agencies 
Appropriations Act, 1996'' the following ``, H.R. 2127'', and that 
Public Law 104-92 is amended by striking out ``March 15, 1996'' in 
section 106(c) and inserting in lieu thereof ``March 22, 1996''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 14, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
DATOS

RÁPIDOS

Departamento del Trabajo de EE.UU.

www.osha.gov (800) 321-OSHA

Para información más completa:

Administración de 

Seguridad y Salud 

Ocupacional

Protéjase

Equipo de Protección

Personal en la

Construcción

Protección Para los Ojos y la Cara

• Las gafas de seguridad o caretas se usan siempre que las

operaciones en el trabajo puedan causar que objetos

extraños entren a los ojos. Por ejemplo, cuando se esté

soldando, cortando, puliendo, clavando (o cuando se esté

trabajando con concreto y/o químicos peligrosos o

expuesto a partículas que vuelan). Utilícelos cuando esté

expuesto a cualquier riesgo eléctrico, incluyendo el trabajar en sistemas eléctricos energizados (vivos).

• Protectores para ojos y cara – se seleccionan en base a los

riesgos anticipados.

Protección para los Pies

• Los trabajadores de la construcción deben utilizar zapatos

o botas de trabajo con suelas resistentes a resbalones y

perforaciones.

• El calzado con punta de metal es usado para prevenir que

los dedos de los pies queden aplastados cuando se trabaja alrededor de equipo pesado u objetos que caen.

Protección para las Manos

• Los guantes deben ajustar cómodamente.

• Los trabajadores deben usar los guantes correctos para el

trabajo que van a hacer (ejemplos: guantes de goma de

alta resistencia para trabajos con concreto, guantes de

soldar para soldaduras, guantes y mangas con aislamiento cuando se esté expuesto a riesgos eléctricos).

Protección para la Cabeza

• Use cascos de seguridad donde haya potencial de que

objetos caigan desde arriba, de golpes en la cabeza por

objetos fijos o contacto accidental de la cabeza con riesgos eléctricos.

• Cascos de seguridad – inspecciónelos rutinariamente

para detectar abolladuras, grietas o deterioro.

Reemplácelos después de que hayan recibido un golpe

fuerte o descarga eléctrica. Manténgalos en buenas

condiciones.

Protección para los Oídos

• Use tapones para oídos/orejeras en áreas de trabajo de

alto ruido donde se usen sierras de cadena o equipo

pesado. Limpie o reemplace los tapones para oídos regularmente.
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.6511(d)-3 Special rules applicable to credit against income tax for foreign taxes. ( a ) *Period in which claim may be filed.* In the case of an overpayment of income tax resulting from a credit, allowed under the provisions of section 901 or under the provisions of any treaty to which the United States is a party, for taxes paid or accrued to a foreign country or possession of the United States, a claim for credit or refund must be filed by the taxpayer within 10 years from the last date prescribed for filing the return (determined without regard to any extension of time for filing such return) for the taxable year with respect to which the claim is made. Such 10-year period shall be applied in lieu of the 3-year period prescribed in section 6511(a).
( b ) *Limit on amount to be credited or refunded.* In the case of a claim described in paragraph (a) of this section, the amount of the credit or refund allowed or made may exceed the portion of the tax paid within the period prescribed in section 6511 (b) or (c), whichever is applicable, to the extent of the amount of the overpayment attributable to the allowance of a credit against income tax referred to in paragraph (a) of this section.
IA

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 186

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States restoring

the right of Americans to pray in public institutions, including public

school graduation ceremonies and athletic events.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 23, 1996

Mr. HEFNER introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States restoring the right of Americans to pray in public

institutions, including public school graduation ceremonies and athletic events.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is hereby proposed as an amendment to the

5 Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to

6 all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution if rati7 fied by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several
2

HJ 186 IH

1 States within 7 years from the date of its submission to

2 the States by the Congress:

3 ‘‘ARTICLE—

4 ‘‘Nothing in this Constitution shall be construed to

5 prohibit voluntary individual or group prayer in public

6 schools or other public institutions, or to prohibit prayer

7 at public school baccalaureate services, athletic events, or

8 other extracurricular activities. No person shall be re9 quired by the United States or by any State to participate

10 in prayer or to be present during any prayer. Neither the

11 United States nor any State shall compose the words of

12 any prayer to be said in public schools or other public in13 stitutions, or at events sponsored by public schools or

14 other public institutions.’’.

Æ