alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Proposed Rule: Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gas EmissionsMeeting Documentation: Applied Materials (AMAT)DateStaff ContactInformationName of OrganizationSummary of DiscussionWrittenCommentsProvided?Did they alsosubmit to Docket?Date sent toEPA- CCD06/01/10Shep Burtonsburton@icfi.com415 902 5504Shep Burtonsburton@icfi.com415 902 5504Applied Material (AMAT),Santa Clara, CAPhil Chandler,Phil_Chandler@amat.comDan Clark,Daniel_Clark@amat.comMehran Moalem ,Mehran_Moalem@amat.comDiscussed NF3RPS emissions factors published inEPA’s Notice of Data Availability (NODA).Attention given to the breadth of emission factors(EFs) presented in NODA as evidenced by anunexpectedly large coefficient variation for thevalues received and tabulated and whether EFs for200 mm and 300 mm wafer technology should differon average. Discussed potential that EF data setmight include outliers and, if so, what might explainthem. AMAT participants believed EFs >0.1 werelikely outliers, which may have been measuredincorrectly or measured correctly but wereunrepresentative of currently installed RPStechnology (either because the technology was not inuse or system was poorly maintained). Among thereasons AMAT representatives expected a smallercoefficient of variation (COV) for in-use NF3RPStechnology was the similarity in commerciallyavailable and installed technologies for both 200mm and 300 mm wafer technologies. Even thoughflow rates for 300 mm technology exceedscorresponding flow rates for 200 mm technology,the RF power to sustain the plasma is increased inthe 300 mm systems to achieve the same NF3destruction efficiency. AMAT is the market leader isNF3RPS technology. AMAT did not believe that, onaverage, EFs for 200 mm and 300 mm should differor that the COV of EFs for each wafer technologyshould differ.AMATsubmittedcomments to thedocket.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL WILLIAMSON; et al.,

 Plaintiffs - Appellants,

 v.

ERICK GEISLER; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 14-55843

D.C. No. 2:12-cv-08056-DSF-JC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 8, 2016

Pasadena, California

Before: CLIFTON and IKUTA, Circuit Judges and BLOCK,** Senior District

Judge.

 

Michael Williamson and Dwight Lay appeal the district court’s denial of

their motion for class certification pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. 

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. 

FILED

MAR 15 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The Honorable Frederic Block, Senior District Judge for the U.S.

District Court for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.
The district court did not abuse its discretion in holding that the appellants

failed to meet their burden of demonstrating that their proposed class met the

numerosity and superiority requirements of Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure. See Gen. Tel. Co. of the Nw., Inc. v. EEOC, 446 U.S. 318, 330 & n.14

(1980); Harik v. Cal. Teachers Ass’n, 326 F.3d 1042, 1051–52 (9th Cir. 2003); see

also Wolin v. Jaguar Land Rover N. Am., LLC, 617 F.3d 1168, 1175 (9th Cir.

2010). Although appellants argue on appeal that the proposed class contains in

excess of 100 members, their argument to the district court indicated a class size in

the neighborhood of 40 to 50 members. Numerosity is far from clear with numbers

in that range. Gen. Tel., 446 U.S. at 330 n.14. Moreover, nothing in the record

contradicted the appellees’ evidence that a majority of prospective class members

had signed individual releases of their claims, see Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes,

131 S. Ct. 2541, 2551 (2011), and the appellants failed to provide any evidence

supporting their argument that the individual releases were invalid under section

206.5(a) of the California Labor Code. 

AFFIRMED. 

2
§ 57.10 Applicability date. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, §§ 57.1 through 57.9 apply to any fee that is due on or after September 30, 2014.
( b ) *Paragraphs (b)(3) and (c)(3)(ii) of § 57.2.* Paragraphs (b)(3) and (c)(3)(ii) of § 57.2 apply on February 22, 2018.
( c ) Section 57.3(a)(2)(ii) applies to Forms 8963, including corrected Forms 8963, filed after December 31, 2019.
[T.D. 9711, 80 FR 10335, Feb. 26, 2015, as amended by T.D. 9830, 83 FR 8175, Feb. 26, 2018; T.D. 9881, 84 FR 61547, Nov. 13, 2019]
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**               ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

** **

Reference is hereby made to that certain Poolingand Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2016, by and among WELLS FARGOCOMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as General Master Servicer, CWCAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, asGeneral Special Servicer, NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BANK, N.A., as NCB MasterServicer and as NCB Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,as Certificate Administrator, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asTrustee, and PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Operating Advisor and as AssetRepresentations Reviewer with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates Series 2016-LC25 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized termsused herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuantto Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice Presidentof Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.           Areview of the activities of the General Master Servicer during the period fromJanuary 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”) , and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision,and

 

2.          Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the General Master Servicer,has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all materialrespects throughout the ReportingPeriod.

 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersignedhas executed this Certificate as of the 28th day ofFebruary2018.

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1074

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for uniform

coverage under part B of the medicare program of blood-testing strips

for individuals with diabetes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 28, 1995

Ms. FURSE (for herself, Mr. GEJDENSON, Mr. NETHERCUTT, and Mr. LIPINSKI) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Commerce and, in addition, to the Committee on Ways and Means,

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the

committee concerned

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide

for uniform coverage under part B of the medicare program of blood-testing strips for individuals with diabetes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MEDICARE COVERAGE OF BLOOD-TESTING

4 STRIPS FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH DIABETES.

5 (a) INCLUDING STRIPS AS DURABLE MEDICAL

6 EQUIPMENT.—Section 1861(n) of the Social Security Act
2

•HR 1074 IH

1 (42 U.S.C. 1395x(n)) is amended by striking the semi2 colon in the first sentence and inserting the following: ‘‘,

3 and includes blood-testing strips for individuals with dia4 betes without regard to whether the individual has Type

5 I or Type II diabetes (as determined under standards es6 tablished by the Secretary in consultation with the Amer7 ican Diabetes Association);’’.

8 (b) PAYMENT FOR STRIPS BASED ON METHODOLOGY

9 FOR INEXPENSIVE AND ROUTINELY PURCHASED EQUIP10 MENT.—Section 1834(a)(2)(A) of such Act (42 U.S.C.

11 1395m(a)(2)(A)) is amended—

12 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of clause (ii);

13 (2) by adding ‘‘or’’ at the end of clause (iii);

14 and

15 (3) by inserting after clause (iii) the following

16 new clause:

17 ‘‘(iv) which is a blood-testing strip for

18 an individual with diabetes,’’.

19 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

20 this section shall apply to blood-testing strips furnished

21 on or after January 1, 1996.

Æ
§ 48.4218-2 Business or personal use of articles. ( a ) *Business use.* Section 4218 applies to the use by a person, in the operation of any business in which he is engaged, of a taxable article which has been manufactured, produced, or imported by him or his agent. For example, a person engaged in the operation of a dairy business incurs liability for tax with respect to a truck body manufactured by him and used in the operation of his dairy business.
( b ) *Personal use.* The tax on use of a taxable article does not attach in cases where an individual incidentally manufactures, produces, or imports a taxable article for his personal use or causes a taxable article to be manufactured, produced, or imported for his personal use.
[T.D. 6687, 28 FR 11781, Nov. 5, 1963]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF JUNE 30, 2000 AND FOR THE 3 AND 6 MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      13,551,065
<SECURITIES>                                 2,970,186
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,095,742
<PP&E>                                       8,094,195
<DEPRECIATION>                             (6,568,440)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              26,173,546
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,149,654
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       382,536
<OTHER-SE>                                 153,096,739
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                26,173,546
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               677,858
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,837,709
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              84,655
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (8,355,564)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (8,355,564)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,355,564)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.22)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1113 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1113

    To suspend until January 1, 1998, the duty on Fluridone aquatic 
                               herbicide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 2, 1995

Mr. Burton of Indiana introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend until January 1, 1998, the duty on Fluridone aquatic 
                               herbicide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AQUATIC WEED CONTROL HERBICIDE.

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new heading:
    

``  9902.31.12  1-methyl-3-phenyl-5- (3-                                                                        
                 (trifluoro-methyl)                                                                             
                 phenyl)-4(1H)-pyridinon                                                                        
                 e (Fluridone) (provided                                                                        
                 for in subheading                                                                              
                 2933.39.25)............  Free             No change        No change        On or before 12/   
                                                                                              31/97             
                                                                                                              ''

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 1 shall apply with respect to goods 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 
15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
39691.

#### PORTER v. BENNETT.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

1. “ ‘Instructions to a jury, even if not in all respects correct, afford no cause for a new trial where they are manifestly harmless to the complaining party.’ *Martin v. Gibbons,*14 Ga. App. 136 (80 SE 522); *Williams v. State,*180 Ga. 595 (3) (180 SE 101). See also *Faires v. Central of Ga. R. Co.,*19 Ga. App. 121 (91 SE 241).” *Kimball v. State,*63 App. 183, 187 (10 SE2d 240). Accordingly, the excerpt from the charge complained of in the first special ground of the motion for new trial which instructed the jury upon the act of 1955 (Ga. L. 1955, p. 454; *Code Ann.*§ 68-301), declared unconstitutional in the case of *Frankel v. Cone,*214 Ga. 733 (107 SE2d 819), was not harmful to the defendant where the undisputed evidence showed the driver of the defendant’s automobile to be his servant and employee engaged in the scope of his employment at the time complained of.

2. “Plaintiff in error cannot complain of a charge contended for and invited by [his] pleadings and unobjected to by the plaintiff [defendant-in-error].” *Young v. Cedartown Block*&c. *Co.,*89 Ga. App. 509, 511 (2b) (79 SE2d 828). Therefore, the excerpt from the charge of the court complained of in the second special ground of the motion for new trial, which was in accordance with the defendant’s answer shows no harmful error to the defendant.

3. “ ‘Special grounds of a motion for new trial complaining that the court failed to charged on certain controlling issues in the case, but which neither set forth in substance any pleadings or evidence raising such issues, nor refer to and identify the same by page number in the record, are too incomplete for consideration by this court. *Maxwell v. Hollis,*214 Ga. 358 (104 SE2d 893); *Kirby v. Whitlock-Dobbs, Inc.,*97 Ga. App. 159 (3) (102 SE2d 631); *Brewer v. Henson,*96 Ga. App. 501 (100 SE2d 661); *Hartsfield v. Hartsfield,*87 Ga. App. 707 (2) (75 SE2d 276.’ *Hodges v. Gay,*100 Ga. App. 210 (1) (110 SE2d 570).” *Burns v. McLucas,*106 Ga. App. 102 (1) (126 SE2d 309). Accordingly, the two remaining special grounds of the amended motion for new trial which failed to set forth, or refer by page number to, the pleadings and evidence requiring such instructions are incomplete and cannot be considered.

*587Decided September 21, 1962.

*Hitch, Miller, Beckmann*<fc *Simpson, Luhr G. C. Beckmann,*for plaintiff in error.

*Ralph L. Dawson,*contra.

4. The evidence authorized the verdict.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Frankum and Jordan, JJ., concur.*
AMENDMENT TO 1997 EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTION PLAN



 Exhibit 10.5 
 TERADYNE, INC. 
 Amendment 
 To 
 1997 Employee Stock Option Plan 
 This Amendment to the 1997 Employee Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”), of Teradyne, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”),
is adopted by resolution of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) pursuant to a meeting of the Board dated as of January 22-23, 2007 and effective as of January 23, 2007 (the “Effective Date”). Paragraph
6.D. Determination of Fair Market Value of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following as of the Effective Date: 
 “D. Determination of Fair Market Value. If, at the time an Option is granted under the Plan, the Company’s Common Stock is publicly traded, “fair market value” shall be determined as of the date of grant
or, if the prices or quotes discussed in this sentence are unavailable for such date, the last business day for which such prices or quotes are available prior to the date of grant and shall mean (i) the closing price (on that date) of the
Common Stock on the principal national securities exchange on which the Common Stock is traded, if the Common Stock is then traded on a national securities exchange; or (ii) the closing bid price (or average of bid prices) last quoted (on that
date) by an established quotation service for over-the-counter securities, if the Common Stock is not then traded on a national securities exchange. If the Common Stock is not publicly traded at the time an Option is granted under the Plan,
“fair market value” shall mean the fair market value of the Common Stock as determined by the Committee after taking into consideration all factors which it deems appropriate, including, without limitation, recent sale and offer prices of
the Common Stock in private transactions negotiated at arm’s length.”
# L_2019298EN.01001201.xml

| 19.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 298/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 298/12

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2019/1870 of 7 November 2019 amending and correcting Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 as regards maximum levels of erucic acid and hydrocyanic acid in certain foodstuffs

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 289 of 8 November 2019
  )

Annex I and II are replaced by the following:

“ANNEX I

In section 8 of the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006, entry 8.1 is replaced by the following:

| Foodstuffs(1) | Maximum level (g/kg) |
| --- | --- |
| “8.1 | Erucic acid, including erucic acid bound in fat | |
| 8.1.1 | Vegetable oils and fats placed on the market for the final consumer or for use as an ingredient in food, with the exception of camelina oil, mustard oil and borage oil | 20,0 |
| 8.1.2. | Camelina oil, mustard oil (*1) and borage oil | 50,0 |
| 8.1.3. | Mustard (condiment) | 35,0 |

Foodstuffs(1)

Maximum level (g/kg)

“8.1

Erucic acid, including erucic acid bound in fat

8.1.1

Vegetable oils and fats placed on the market for the final consumer or for use as an ingredient in food, with the exception of camelina oil, mustard oil and borage oil

20,0

8.1.2.

Camelina oil, mustard oil (*1) and borage oil

50,0

8.1.3.

Mustard (condiment)

35,0

ANNEX II

In section 8 of the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006, entry 8.3 is replaced by the following:

| Foodstuffs(1) | Maximum level (mg/kg) |
| --- | --- |
| “8.3 | Hydrocyanic acid, including hydrocyanic acid bound in cyanogenic glycosides | |
| 8.3.1 | Unprocessed whole, ground, milled, cracked, chopped apricot kernels placed on the market for the final consumer (54)
   (55) | 20,0 |

Foodstuffs(1)

Maximum level (mg/kg)

“8.3

Hydrocyanic acid, including hydrocyanic acid bound in cyanogenic glycosides

8.3.1

Unprocessed whole, ground, milled, cracked, chopped apricot kernels placed on the market for the final consumer (54)
   (55)

20,0

---

(*1)  With acceptance from the competent authority, the maximum level does not apply to mustard oil locally produced and consumed.“

*1

(54)  
  ‘Unprocessed products’ as defined in Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on they hygiene of foodstuffs (OJ L 139, 30.4.2004, p. 1).

54

(55)  
  ‘Placing on the market’ and ‘final consumer’ as defined in Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety (OJ L 31, 1.2.2002, p. 1)”.’

55

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5

       


<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                                OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                  DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                                             96,102
<SECURITIES>                                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                     524,483
<ALLOWANCES>                                                      190,000
<INVENTORY>                                                        94,386
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                1,372,301
<PP&E>                                                            372,914
<DEPRECIATION>                                                     17,981
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                  4,669,685
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           3,069,185
<BONDS>                                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                                             0
<COMMON>                                                          585,116
<OTHER-SE>                                                      (601,829)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                    4,669,685
<SALES>                                                           730,497
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                  730,497
<CGS>                                                             408,139
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                     408,139
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                1,342,432
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                 10,423
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               (1,030,497)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           (1,030,497)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                         0
<CHANGES>                                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  (1,030,497)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                      (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                           0

        



</TABLE>