alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Environmental Health Sciences Review Committee.                    

*Date:*                         August 25-26, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Sheraton Chapel Hill Hotel, One Europa Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27517.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Linda K Bass, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research and Training, Nat'l Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, P.O. Box 12233, MD EC-30, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, (919) 541-1307.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.115, Biometry and Risk Estimation—Health Risks from Environmental Exposures; 93.142, NIEHS Hazardous Waste Worker Health and Safety Training; 93.143, NIEHS Superfund Hazardous Substances—Basic Research and Education; 93.894, Resources and Manpower Development in the Environmental Health Sciences; 93.113, Biological Response to Environmental Health Hazards; 93.114, Applied Toxicological Research and Testing, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: August 3, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-18993 Filed 8-6-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Encorium Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Philip L. Calamia, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Philip L. Calamia                                         
|Philip L. Calamia                                             
|Interim Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting
Officer)

August 21, 2009

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or
as a separate disclosure document.
#### § 1010.920 Access to records.

Except as provided in §§ 1020.410(b)(1), 1021.410(a), and 1023.410(a)(1), and except for the purpose of assuring compliance with the recordkeeping and reporting requirements of this chapter, this chapter does not authorize the Secretary or any other person to inspect or review the records required to be maintained by this chapter. Other inspection, review or access to such records is governed by other applicable law.
§ 48.6427-5 Records to be kept in substantiation of credits or payments. ( a ) *In general.* Every person making a claim for credit or payment under section 6427 must keep records sufficient to enable the district director to determine whether the person is entitled to credit or payment under such section and, if so, the amount of the credit or payment. No particular form is prescribed for keeping the records, but the records must include a copy of the income tax return or claim and a copy of any statement or document submitted with the return or claim. The records must also show with respect to the period covered by the claim— ( 1 ) The number of gallons of fuel purchased and the dates of purchase,
( 2 ) The name and address of each vendor from whom fuel was purchased and the total number of gallons purchased from each,
( 3 ) The number of gallons of fuel purchased by the claimant and used during the period covered by the claim for nontaxable purposes, farming purposes, for other purposes taxable at a lower rate, in local, intercity, or school buses, and
( 4 ) Other information as necessary to establish the correctness of the claim.
( b ) *Acceptable records.* ( 1 ) Evidence of purchases of fuel, and the purposes for which it was used, to substantiate claims may include paid duplicate sales invoices or tickets from the fuel dealer or other vendor, and detailed records of all fuel used which show the amount used the prescribed purpose and the amount used for other purposes.
( 2 ) Records maintained for Federal or State income tax purposes, or to support claims for refund of a State tax on fuel, may be used to the extent that they contain the information necessary to substantiate the accuracy of the claim for credit under section 6427. However, the records must show separately the number of gallons of fuel used for nontaxable purposes, farming purposes, other purposes taxable at a lower rate, or in intercity, local, or school buses during the period covered by the claim.
( c ) *Place and period for keeping records.* ( 1 ) All records required by this section must be kept by the claimant at a convenient and safe location within the United States which is accessible to internal revenue officers and shall during normal business hours be available for inspection by internal revenue officers. If the claimant has a principal place of business in the United States, the records must be kept at that place of business.
( 2 ) Records required to substantiate a claim under section 6427 must be maintained for a period of at least 3 years from the last date prescribed for the filing of the claim for credit or payment.
[T.D. 8043, 50 FR 32049, Aug. 8, 1985]
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)





The
undersigned Chief Financial Officer of First Keystone Financial, Inc. (the
“Registrant”) hereby certifies that the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.





/s/ David M. TakatsName:
      David M. TakatsTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer





Date:  August
14, 2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act has been provided to First Keystone Financial, Inc. and will be retained by
First Keystone Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Louis Douglas, Appellant.

[805 NYS2d 755]

Appeal from a judgment of the Oneida County Court (Michael L. Dwyer, J.), rendered May 29, 2001. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him after a jury trial of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree (Penal Law § 220.18 [1]) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (§ 200.16 [1]). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the conviction *(see People v Gray,*86 NY2d 10, 19 [1995]). In any event, that contention is without merit. We conclude that there is a “valid line of reasoning and permissible inferences which could lead a rational person to the conclusion reached by the jury” *(People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]), i.e., that defendant exercised “a level of control over the drugs [seized from his accomplice] sufficient to support a finding of constructive possession” *(People v Manini,*79 NY2d 561, 575 [1992]). We reject defendant’s further contention that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence *(see generally Bleakley,*69 NY2d at 495).

Contrary to defendant’s contention, County Court properly refused to suppress the cocaine seized during the execution of a search warrant authorizing the search of defendant’s person. *1152We conclude that the testimony of a police investigator and a police informant before the Magistrate was sufficient to establish probable cause to issue the search warrant *(see People v McQueen,*11 AD 3d 1005, 1006 [2004], *lv denied*4 NY3d 765 [2005]). In addition, the court properly refused to suppress the cocaine seized from defendant’s accomplice. Defendant failed to establish a “legitimate expectation of privacy” with respect to the undergarments of his accomplice and therefore lacked standing to seek suppression of the cocaine that was seized from her *(People v Wesley,*73 NY2d 351, 359 [1989]).

We agree with defendant that the court erred in admitting the testimony of a police witness that a small amount of marihuana was recovered during a search of defendant *(see generally People v Ventimiglia,*52 NY2d 350, 359-360 [1981]). We nevertheless conclude that the error in admitting that testimony is harmless *(see generally People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230, 241-242 [1975]). We further conclude that the testimony of defendant’s accomplice was sufficiently corroborated by evidence tending to connect defendant to the commission of the crimes *(see*CPL 60.22 [1]; *People v Besser,*96 NY2d 136, 146 [2001]; *cf. People v Johnson,*1 AD3d 891 [2003]). The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contention and conclude that it is without merit. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Scudder, Kehoe, Smith and Pine, JJ.
#### § 11.408(a)(2)-1 Trustee of individual retirement accounts.

A person may demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the manner in which he will administer the trust will be consistent with the requirements of section 408 only upon the filing of a written application to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Attention: E:EP, Internal Revenue Service, Washington, D.C. 20224. Such application must meet the applicable requirements of the regulations under section 401(d)(1) relating to nonbank trustees of pension and profit-sharing trusts benefiting owner-employees.

(Sec. 408(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (88 Stat. 959, 26 U.S.C. 408(a)(2)))

[T.D. 7390, 40 FR 53580, Nov. 19, 1975]
# U n i ted S t a te s Cou r t o f Appe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 22-1292 September Term, 2022 RRRB- 08/ 08/202 2 Dec ision Filed O n: June 16 , 20 23 Lau ra A. Gutt eridge An os,

Pet itione r
v . U.S. Ra ilroad Re tireme nt B oard ,

Respo nde nt ON PETI TION FOR REVI EWFROM A N ORDER OF THE RA ILROA D RETIREMENT BOA RD BEFORE: Mill ett, Pillard, a nd Rao, Circuit Judges J U D G M E N T T his pe tition for review of an orde r of

the United Sta tes Ra ilroad Re tireme nt Boa rd was co nside red o n th e b riefs an d a ppe ndix f iled b y the pa rties. S ee Fed. R. App . P. 34 (a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 3 4(j). It is ORDERED A ND A DJUDGED tha t th e p etition for review be de nied . T he Railroad Retirem entBo ard’s d ecision was su ppo rted by substa ntial e v iden ce a nd not base d o n a ny error of

law. See Reed v. R.R. Ret. B d., 145 F.3d 37 3, 3 75 (D.C. Cir. 199 8) (per cu riam). Unde r the “highly de feren tial” sub stan tial-evi den ce sta nda rd, we mu st ab ide b y

the Bo ard’s “reaso nab le f indings an d co nclusion s,” even if the evidence could ha v e su ppo rted a co ntrary v iew . Marsha ll Cnty. Coal Co. v. Fed . Mine Safety & Health Rev. Comm 'n, 9 23 F.3d 19 2, 2 01 (D.C. Cir. 2019 ) (q uot ing Cumb erland Coal Res., L P v. Fed. Mine Sa fety & Hea lth Review Com m'n , 71 7 F.3 d 1 020 , 10 28 (D.C. Cir. 201 3)). Here, the Bo ard rea sona bly fo und pe titione r’s request un time ly w ith resp ect t o the pe riod th rough Dece mb er 20 10, reaso nab ly con cluding th at n eithe r the f raud no r the equity except ions t o th e four-year time ba r app lied. See 45 U.S.C. § 2 31h ; 20 C.F.R. § 211 .16 (a), (b)(1), (2)(iv ). As t o p etition er’s time ly request w ith resp ect t o th e mo nth of Jan uary 201 1, t he Boa rd likew ise rea sona bly fo und tha t pe titione r did n ot serv e a s an em ployee o f CSX Tran sporta tion during th at m ont h.

# U n i ted S t a te s Cou r t o f Appe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 22-1292 September Term, 2022
Pursua nt t o D.C. Circuit Ru le 36 , th is dispo sition will no t be pu blished . T he Clerk is directe d to w ithho ld issua nce of the m and ate he rein u ntil seven d ays af ter reso lution of an y tim ely petition for rehe aring or pe tition for rehe aring en ban c. S ee Fed. R. Ap p. P. 4 1(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41

. Per Curiam

Page 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1,466,770
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,373,839
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,840,609
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,840,609
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          423,015
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,417,594
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,840,609
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               69,522
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               27,144
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                42,378
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   42,378
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .00
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Properties III
L.P. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 29, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Neal Ludeke, Chief Financial Officer of Richman Housing Credits
Inc., general partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties III L.P., general partner
of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant
to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrant.


/s/ Neal Ludeke
---------------------------------------
Neal Ludeke
Chief Financial Officer of Richman
Housing Credits Inc., general partner
of Richman Tax Credit Properties III
L.P., General Partner of the Registrant
November 14, 2005
#### Ann S. Brannan, Respondent, v George W. Brownsell, III, et al., Appellants.

[804 NYS2d 217]

*1107Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Herkimer County (Michael E. Daley, J.), entered March 11, 2005. The order denied defendants’ motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint and granted plaintiffs cross motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of negligence.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed with costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for injuries she sustained when the vehicle in which she was a passenger was struck from behind by a vehicle owned by defendant George W. Brownsell, III and operated by defendant Jessica M. Brownsell. Supreme Court properly denied defendants’ motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). With respect to the “loss of a fetus” category of serious injury *(id.),*defendants met their initial burden by submitting the affidavit of their expert obstetrician/gynecologist. The affidavit of plaintiffs treating obstetrician/gynecologist, however, raises a triable issue of fact whether plaintiff suffered the loss of a fetus. Although defendants also met their initial burden with respect to the three remaining categories of serious injury alleged by plaintiff, i.e., the permanent consequential limitation of use, significant limitation of use and 90/180 categories, plaintiff raised triable issues of fact whether the injuries to her lumbar and cervical spine qualify under those categories *(see generally Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). With respect to the permanent consequential limitation of use and significant limitation of use categories, plaintiff submitted the affirmation of her physician in which he relied upon objective proof of plaintiffs injury *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345, 350 [2002]; *Matte v Hall,*20 AD3d 898, 899 [2005]), “provided numeric percentages of plaintiffs loss of range of motion as well as qualitative assessments of plaintiffs condition” and concluded that plaintiffs injuries were significant and permanent *(Leahey v Fitzgerald,*1 AD3d 924, 926 [2003]). Further, plaintiffs physician concluded that plaintiff was disabled from working for four months following the accident, when she was cleared to return to light duty, and thus plaintiff raised an issue of fact with respect to the 90/180 category *(see Matte,*20 AD3d at 899; *Zeigler v Ramadhan,*5 AD3d 1080, 1081 [2004]; *see also Leahey,*1 AD3d at 926). Finally, we conclude that the evidence *1108submitted by defendants in support of their motion is insufficient to shift the burden to plaintiff on the issue whether the injury to her lumbar and cervical spine allegedly sustained in the accident was a preexisting injury *(see Pommells v Perez,*4 NY3d 566, 577-578 [2005]; *cf. Franchini v Palmieri,*1 NY3d 536, 537 [2003]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Hurlbutt, Gorski and Smith, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       5
<LEGEND>      THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
              INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 10Q DATED 
              SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
              ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
              FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
<MULTIPLIER>                    1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                          299587
<SECURITIES>                    1086588
<RECEIVABLES>                   77479
<ALLOWANCES>                    4648
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1612779
<PP&E>                          150361
<DEPRECIATION>                  103297
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  2145030
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           237133
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        230
<OTHER-SE>                      1686024
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    2145030
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                322869
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   254430
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 74584
<INCOME-TAX>                    27100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             36407
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    36407
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   1.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                   1.60
        

</TABLE>