alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION OF SENIOR OFFICER IN CHARGE OF THE SERVICING FUNCTION OF THE SERVICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Kim Taylor, certify that:





1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Huntington Auto Trust 2016-1 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");





2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on the information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.








By:     /s/ Kim Taylor


Name:     Kim Taylor


Title:       Senior Vice President, The Huntington National Bank, as Servicer





Date: March 14, 2019
#### Richard J. Shaw, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Carrie Shaw, Deceased, et al., Appellants, v Qc-Medi New York, Inc., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

[803 NYS2d 479]

Appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (John *V.*Centra, J.), entered May 26, 2004. The order and judgment granted the motions of defendants QC-Medi New York, Inc., Olsten Kimberly Qualitycare, Inc., Olsten Health Services (Quantum) Corp., Olsten Corporation, Stafcare of New York, Inc. (doing business as AmeriCare), and Jean Sanders, L.EN., for partial summary judgment dismissing the claims for punitive damages.

It is hereby ordered that the order and judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for the reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Gorski, Smith and Lawton, JJ.
P. 04/ 05 

GOVERNMENT OF PUERTO RICO 

OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR 

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY BOARD PUERTO RICO 

VERDE 

Office of the Executivo Director 

April 29, 2010 

Mrs. Judith Bnck 

Regiona!Adrninistrator 

US Envirorunentl! Prottttion Agency 

290 Broadway, 26'" Floor 

New York, NY 10007-1866 

RECOMMENDATION TO INCLUDE THE HORMIGAS 

GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION SITE IN CAGUAS, PUERTO 

RICO ON THE NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST 

Dear Mrs. Enck: 

After reviewing all ti,e available infonnation reg.rding the Honnigas Groundwater 

Contamination Site located in the Municipality of Cagwts, the Puerto Rico 

Environmental Quality Board (PREQB), on behalf of the Govemor of Puerto Rico, 

is concurring with the decision made by the United States Environmental Protection 

Agency (USEPA) to include this site on the National Priorities List (NPL). Our 

concurrence in this case is made to ensure an appropriate action to protect the 

surrounding population and na!U1-.! resources from the risk posed by this site, due to 

the contamination of tlle groundwater. 

By including this site on the NPL, the USEPA will have the lead in the investigation 

and remediation of the gtoundwater in this area, as well as implementing a sttong 

community involvement plan. PREQB is committed to jointly porticip.te in this 

long-term process for the prese(Vation of our communities' health and welfare. Our 

goal is to assist the USEPA in their effort to define, contain, and dean up the 

contamination by implementing remedial actions in wruch the treatment permanently 

and significantly reduces the volume, TOxicity, or mobility of the hazardous 

substances, pollutants, and contaminants as defined in Section 121 of CERCLA, as 

amended by SARA. 

Cn..z A. MalO$ EnvlfQnmtntsl Agencle3 8ldg.. San o= ~ ndlJ:;lri~ 1 P:irtc 


1375 Ponca de Le6n Me" SIn Juan. PR OCl92S·26Q<t 


P.O. Ba:t 11488. S;)n Juan, PR 00910 


Tel. 787·767·8181 Fax 187.76S-01S0 


P. 04 r1AY-13-2010 09: 57 
f1AY -13-21211121 1121: 1121 

l'R£QB NPl. COOC\lnenee 3/2.9/2010 

Horrnigu Sill! rase 2 

If you need furcher .ssis..nce, please contact Mr Genara Toues of my Superfund 

s..ff at (787) 766-2823. 

Sincerely yours, 

C ECIid Y. Vilkps-Hctu!qut:2, PRP.QB 

GC"~fO rorr~ u6n, PRP.QB 

TOTAL P.05 

MAY- 13- 201121 1219:57 P.05
IA

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 182

Disapproving the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (most-favorednation treatment) to the products of the People’s Republic of China.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 13, 1996

Mr. ROHRABACHER (for himself, Mr. SOLOMON, Mr. GILMAN, Ms. PELOSI,

Mr. COX of California, Mr. WOLF, Mr. LANTOS, Mr. HUNTER, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. FAZIO of

California, Mr. TRAFICANT, Mr. DORNAN, Mr. FUNDERBURK, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. BUNNING of Kentucky, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. SCARBOROUGH, Mr.

DIAZ-BALART, Mr. ROSE, Mr. STOCKMAN, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Ms. ROSLEHTINEN, Ms. MCKINNEY, Mr. STEARNS, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. STARK,

Mrs. SCHROEDER, Mr. EVANS, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. MILLER of California,

Mr. BAKER of California, and Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts) introduced

the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on

Ways and Means

JOINT RESOLUTION

Disapproving the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment

(most-favored-nation treatment) to the products of the

People’s Republic of China.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the Congress does not approve the extension of the

4 authority contained in section 402(c) of the Trade Act of

5 1974 recommended by the President to the Congress on
2

•HJ 182 IH

1 May 31, 1996, with respect to the People’s Republic of

2 China.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          30,946
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   88,747
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (8,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    253,098
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               364,791
<PP&E>                                         405,930
<DEPRECIATION>                               (282,916)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 768,315
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,895,299
<BONDS>                                         36,358
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,242
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,165,583)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   768,315
<SALES>                                        119,096
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               119,096
<CGS>                                          101,332
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,764
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               316,751
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 934
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (299,921)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (300,721)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.013)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.013)
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Delroy Valentine, Appellant.

[803 NYS2d 432]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lott, J.), rendered April 12, 2004, convicting him of assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, he was not denied *418the effective assistance of counsel. Viewing the record as a whole, the defendant received meaningful representation *(see People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137 [1981]). Unsuccessful trial strategies and tactics do not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel *(see People v Adams,*12 AD3d 523 [2004]; *People v Mejias,*278 AD2d 249 [2000]). Cozier, J.P. Ritter, Spolzino and Lunn, JJ., concur.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus GARDUNO-MONTOYA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-50736.

D.C. No. CR-00-02241-1-JTM.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 10, 2002.*

Decided June 14, 2002.

Before RYMER, T.G. NELSON, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jesus Garduno-Montoya appeals the conviction and 8-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to importation of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Garduno-Montoya contends that the district court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the indictment because the statutory scheme under which he was charged, 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960, is unconstitutional. This contention is foreclosed by our recent decision in *United States v. Mendoza-Paz,*286 F.3d 1104, 1109-10 (9th Cir.2002) (concluding that § 960 is not facially unconstitutional).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
AAM-13-196-E 

February 22, 2013 

 Exemption No. 10305A 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-0701 

Mr. Daniel J. Lipko 

Pine Bottom Aviation Services, LLC 

Pine Bottom Heliport 

1702 Pulpit Road 

Martinsburg, PA 16662 

Dear Mr. Lipko: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption 

No. 10305. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions 

and limitations. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated February 2, 2013, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Pine Bottom Aviation Services, LLC (Pine Bottom) for an extension of 

Exemption No. 10305. That exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations (14 CFR) allows Pine Bottom, which is operating under separate parts of 14 

CFR, to cover its safety-sensitive employee under one testing program.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Pine Bottom. 
 2

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10305 

remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the 

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has 

delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions and limitations. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Pine Bottom are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times 

while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the 

Pine Bottom part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 10305 to July 31, 2015, unless 

sooner superseded or rescinded 

Sincerely, 

 /s/ 

James R. Fraser, M.D. 

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon
Amendment To Cinergy Corp. Directors' Deferred Compensation Plan



 Exhibit 10.68 
  
 AMENDMENT TO 
 CINERGY CORP. DIRECTORS’ DEFERRED
COMPENSATION PLAN 
  
 The Cinergy Corp. Directors’ Deferred
Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) is amended, effective as of December 19, 2006, as follows: 

	 	1.	Section 4.3 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following new paragraph at the end thereof: 

 “Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, each phantom unit of Common Stock credited to a Participant’s Unit Account on
the Distribution Date shall be converted, as of the Distribution Date, into phantom units of Spectra Energy Corp common stock and phantom units of Common Stock and reallocated as follows: 

	 	(a)	The number of phantom units of Spectra Energy Corp common stock shall be equal to the number of shares of Spectra Energy Corp common stock to which the Participant would have been entitled on
the Distribution had the phantom units of Common Stock represented actual shares of Duke Energy Corporation as of the Record Date, the resulting number of phantom units of Spectra Energy Corp common stock being rounded down to the nearest whole
unit. 


	 	(b)	The resulting number of phantom units of Spectra Energy Corp common stock shall automatically be transferred from the Unit Account and credited to a separate individual account established
and maintained for the exclusive purpose of accounting for the Participant’s deferred amounts which is accrued in terms of a theoretical number of units of Spectra Energy Corp common stock (the “Spectra Unit Account”), effective as of
the Distribution Date. The Spectra Unit Account shall thereafter be subject to the same adjustment provisions related to cash dividends and changes in Spectra Energy Corp common stock as apply to the Unit Account in Section 4.3 hereof.



	 	(c)	A Participant may elect, pursuant to rules and procedures prescribed by Duke Energy Corporation, to reallocate amounts deemed invested in the Spectra Unit Account into the Unit Account or the
Deferred Compensation Account. The Spectra Unit Account shall be closed to additional deferrals and to transfers from any other deemed investment option. 


	 	(d)	Capitalized terms used in this Section 4.3 that are not defined in this Plan shall have the meaning set forth in the Employee Matters Agreement by and between Duke Energy Corporation and
Spectra Energy Corp.” 


	 	2.	Article 6 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following new Section 6.4 at the end thereof: 


	 	“6.4	Payment of Deferred Fees Credited to the Spectra Unit Account. Notwithstanding anything contained in this Article 6 or Article 8 to the contrary, the amounts credited to a
Participant’s Spectra Unit Account will be distributed in the form of cash.” 


	 	3.	Except as explicitly set forth herein, the Plan will remain in full force and effect. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Cinergy Corp. has caused this Amendment to be executed and approved effective as of the date set forth herein. 
  

			
	 By:
	 	 /S/    CHRISTOPHER C.
ROLFE        

		 	Christopher C. Rolfe
		 	Group Executive and Chief
		 	Administrative Officer


  
 Date:
12/19/06
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          56,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,476,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,948,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,830,000
<PP&E>                                         529,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              28,778,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       20,339,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       283,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,156,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                28,778,000
<SALES>                                      7,921,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,921,000
<CGS>                                        3,777,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,440,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (411,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                115,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            115,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   115,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                     .004
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .004


</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.7510-1 Exemption from tax of domestic goods purchased for the United States.

For any regulations under section 7510, see the applicable regulations with respect to the various taxes.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 174 (Monday, September 9, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 55134]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-21885]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8457]

Waiver of Restriction on Assistance to the Central Government of 
Uzbekistan

    Pursuant to Section 7031 (b)(3) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2012 (Division I, 
Pub. L. 112-74) (``the Act''), and Department of State Delegation of 
Authority Number 245-1, I hereby determine that it is important to the 
national interest of the United States to waive the requirements of 
Section 7031 (b)(1) of the Act with respect to Uzbekistan and I hereby 
waive this restriction.
    This determination and accompanying Memorandum of Justification 
shall be reported to the Congress, and the determination shall be 
published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: May 7, 2012.
Thomas R. Nides,
Deputy Secretary for Management and Resources.

    Editorial Note: This document was received at the Office of the 
Federal Register September 4, 2013.
[FR Doc. 2013-21885 Filed 9-6-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-03-P
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

      The undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
First Keystone Financial, Inc. (the "Registrant") hereby certify that the
Registrant's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

                                   /s/ Donald S. Guthrie
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   Name: Donald S. Guthrie
                                   Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

                                   /s/ Thomas M. Kelly
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   Name: Thomas M. Kelly
                                   Title: President and Chief Financial Officer

Date:  May 15, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to First Keystone Financial, Inc. and
will be retained by First Keystone Financial, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
www.gpo.gov

### §5475. Reports on certain activities

At the same time each report is submitted pursuant to section 5474(c) of this title, the President shall submit to the appropriate committees of the Congress a report on the extent of espionage activities against the United States and other member countries of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization by operatives of the government of any East European country that is receiving assistance under this chapter. Such reports may be submitted in classified form.

(Pub. L. 101–179, title VII, §705, Nov. 28, 1989, 103 Stat. 1322.)

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original “this Act”, meaning Pub. L. 101–179, Nov. 28, 1989, 103 Stat. 1298, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5401 of this title and Tables.