alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                               <C>                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            3-mos                YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1996         DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                       MAR-31-1996         DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                 328,751             474,835
<SECURITIES>                                 0                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                0                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0                   0
<INVENTORY>                                  0                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             0                   0
<PP&E>                              17,447,726          17,150,303
<DEPRECIATION>                       2,708,714           2,573,713
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      15,570,662          15,483,025
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        0                   0
<BONDS>                              6,225,000           5,590,418
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0                   0
<PREFERRED>                                  0                   0
<COMMON>                                     0                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                   0                   0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        15,570,662          15,483,025
<SALES>                                      0                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       610,169           2,769,347
<CGS>                                        0                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          669,708           2,605,366
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       106,239             (36,392)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     177,362             559,394
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       (343,140)           (359,021)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 0                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          0                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                               0                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0                   0
<CHANGES>                                    0                   0
<NET-INCOME>                          (343,140)           (359,021)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           (20.76)             (21.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (20.76)             (21.72)

        



</TABLE>
IV

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 158

Instructing the Architect of the Capitol to recommend measures to recognize,

through the National Statuary Hall, the ongoing contributions of all

American citizens, including women.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 29, 1996

Mr. BROWDER submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on House Oversight

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Instructing the Architect of the Capitol to recommend measures to recognize, through the National Statuary Hall,

the ongoing contributions of all American citizens, including women.

Whereas President Clinton proclaimed March as Women’s

History Month;

Whereas National Statuary Hall was established by an Act

of Congress in 1864 as a place where each State may

honor 2 of its citizens who were ‘‘illustrious for their historic renown or for distinguished civic or military services’’ by providing statues of those citizens for display in

the National Statuary Hall;

Whereas 46 of the 95 statues donated by the States were

placed in the National Statuary Hall before ratification
2

HCON 158 IH

of the 19th amendment to the Constitution provided for

women’s suffrage in 1920;

Whereas only 6 of the 95 statues honor women, leaving the

historic contributions of women underrepresented in the

National Statuary Hall; and

Whereas the statues have become the property of the United

States and have formed a static display of each State’s

historic citizens: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Architect of the Capitol, not later

3 than 60 days after the date of the approval of this resolu4 tion and after consultation with individuals who are knowl5 edgeable about history and the arts, shall transmit to Con6 gress a report recommending measures to recognize the

7 ongoing contributions of all American citizens, including

8 women.

Æ
2007 Base Salary Rates; 2006 Cash Award Amounts



 Exhibit 10.1 
 2007 Base Salary Rates; 2006 Cash Award Amounts 
 The following table lists the 2007 base
salary rate and the amount of the 2006 cash incentive award approved on February 26, 2007, for each of our named executive officers. 
  

								
	 Name and Title
	  	 2007
 Base Salary
 Rate
	 	 	 2006
 Cash Bonus
 Amount

	 Arthur H. Keeney III
 President and Chief Executive Officer
	  	$	270,000	 	 	$	69,317
			
	 J. Dorson White
 Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
	  	 	160,000	 	 	 	28,213
			
	 William F. Plyler II
 Senior Vice President and Chief Credit Officer
	  	 	N/A 	(1)	 	 	22,473
			
	 Gary M. Adams
 Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	  	 	105,000	 	 	 	19,458



	(1)	Mr. Plyler retired effective on January 1, 2007.
Memorandum 

U.S. Department of 

Transportation 

Office of the Secretary 

of Transportation 

Subject: 

From: 

To: 

Notice of Communication in Docket: 

DOT-OST-OST-2000-7182 

Spechil Rules for Ronald Reagan Washingto 

Airport (within-perimeter exemptions) 

Secretary Ray LaHood 

Chief, Dockets 

In accordance with Department rules (14 CFR Part 300), I am reporting the following 

communication. 

On January 30, 2013, during a telephone conversation with Representative Gene 

Green of Texas, the Congressman raised the subject of the Department's 

proceeding to allocate two slot exemptions for operations between Ronald Reagan 

Washington National Airport (DCA) and airports within the 1,250-mile DCA 

perimeter. The Congressman expressed his support for Southwest Airlines' 

application to provide service between DCA and Houston's Hobby Airport. 

I informed the Congressman that, while I appreciated his interest in this case, I 

could not comment on its merits because the proceeding was under active 

consideration by the Department. 

Please place this memorandum in the appropriate Docket. 

cc: Congressman Gene Green
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          57,980
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  529,606
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (139,949)
<INVENTORY>                                    362,972
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,179,678
<PP&E>                                         382,516
<DEPRECIATION>                                 240,236
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,578,387
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,631,879<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,324
<OTHER-SE>                                   (316,007)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,578,387
<SALES>                                        716,186
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               716,186
<CGS>                                          320,539
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,396,288
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              87,877
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (759,916)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (761,516)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)
<FN>
<F1>Notes payable to stockholders of 1,249,359 are convertible to units of 
common stock at the option of the noteholders over various dates through 
December 31, 1997.  On average 95% convert to stock.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### § 49.4263-4 Cross reference.

For the rules applicable under section 4263(d) see § 49.4261-4 relating to payments made within the United States.

[T.D. 6430, 24 FR 9665, Dec. 3, 1959. Redesignated and amended by T.D. 9948, 86 FR 5007, Jan. 19, 2021]
| (logo) Grant Thornton |
|-----------------------|
|                  | **Grant Thornton LLP**

201 S College Street, 

Suite 2500

Charlotte, NC 28244-0100

 

T 704.632.3500

F 704.334.7701

www.GrantThornton.com |

 

 

**REPORT OF INDEPENDENTREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

 

Board of Directors

Trimont Real Estate Advisors,LLC:

 

We have examined management’sassertion, included in the accompanying Management’s CertificationRegarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria(“Management’s Report”), that **Trimont Real EstateAdvisors, LLC** (the “Company” or “Trimont”) compliedwith the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securitiesand Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the Company’s SpecialServicing Platform (the “Platform”) as of and for the year endedDecember 31, 2016, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii) and 1122(d)(4)(xv) whichmanagement has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by theCompany with respect to the Platform. The Platform consists of asset-backedtransactions and securities for which the Company acted as special servicer andas defined by management in Exhibit B of Management’s Report. Managementis responsible for the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’sassertion about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria for the Platform based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting OversightBoard (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis,evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria for the Platform and performing such other procedures as we considerednecessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selectedasset-backed transactions and securities constituting the Platform andevaluating whether the Company performed servicing activities related to thosetransactions and securities in compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria for the period covered by this report. Accordingly, our testing maynot have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed transactionor security constituting the Platform. Further, our examination was notdesigned to detect material noncompliance that may have occurred prior to theperiod covered by this report and that may have affected the Company’sservicing activities during the period covered by this report. We believe thatour examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examinationdoes not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance withthe applicable servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that Trimont Real Estate Advisors, LLC compliedwith the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the yearended December 31, 2016 for the Special Servicing Platform is fairly stated, inall material respects.

 

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

 

Charlotte, North Carolina 

February 24, 2017

 

 

**Grant Thornton LLP**

U.S. member firm of GrantThornton International Ltd
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Bernard Brown, Appellant.

[808 NYS2d 88]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Knipel, J.), rendered October 24, 2001, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant argues that the judgment of conviction must be set aside because the trial court failed to read to counsel or allow counsel to see the jury’s notes requesting certain exhibits and a readback of testimony. The defendant’s contention is unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Starling,*85 NY2d 509, 516 [1995]; *People v Fair,*308 AD2d 597*492[2003]; *People v Zito,*299 AD2d 569, 570-571 [2002]). Unlike the situation presented recently in *People v Kisoon*(23 AD3d 18 [2005]), the record reflects, albeit inferentially, that counsel reviewed the jury’s notes. Defense counsel neither objected nor responded in the negative to the contrary when the trial justice stated, “I assume you both saw the notes.” We decline to review the defendant’s argument in the interest of justice (see *People v Clark,*298 AD2d 461 [2002]). Luciano, J.P., Mastro, Spolzino and Skelos, JJ., concur.
1.06 NM

.6903 NM

1.282 NM

1.874 NM

30kt Wind - Due West

N

 Proposed Auke Bay Route - Westerly Wind

= Minimum Autorotation Glide Distance AS-350 at 2,000ft AGL w/ No Wind

= Autorotation Glide Distance Given a 30kt Westerly Wind at 1700ft/min 

 rate of descent from 2,000ft AGL with a 65kt glide speed

=Proposed Landing Site
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 139 Introduced in House (IH)]

  2d Session
H. J. RES. 139

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1996, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 1996

Mr. Obey introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1996, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That section 106(c) of Public 
Law 104-56 is amended by striking ``December 15, 1995'' and inserting 
``January 26, 1996''.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

1.   The undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Western Gas Resources, Inc. (“Western Gas Resources”). This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Western Gas Resources for the quarter ended March 31, 2006.

 

2.   We certify that such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Western Gas Resources.

 

This Certification is executed as of May 9, 2006.

 
|   | /s/ Peter A. Dea                                                        |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Peter A. Dea, Chief Executive Officerand President                      |
|   |                                                                    |
|   |                                                                    |
|   | /s/ William J. Krysiak                                                  |   |
|   | William J. Krysiak, Executive Vice Presidentand Chief Financial Officer |
|        |                                                                         |        |  |

 

----
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 12
EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 12
EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 12
EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 12
EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 12
EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 12
EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 12
EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 12
EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 12
EPA SANITIZED Page 10 of 12
EPA SANITIZED Page 11 of 12
EPA SANITIZED Page 12 of 12
#### § 403.39 Time of filing petition.

A complete petition for remission or mitigation must be filed before the expiration of three months after the sale or other disposition of the property with respect to which the petition is filed. For purposes of this part, the term “sale or other disposition” includes acquisition of the property for official use.

(Sec. 613, 46 Stat. 756, sec. 306, 49 Stat. 880; (19 U.S.C. 1613, 40 U.S.C. 304(k)))
§ 48.4041-9 Exemption for farm use. ( a ) *In general.* The tax imposed by section 4041 does not apply to diesel fuel or special motor fuel, or fuel used in noncommercial aviation, sold for use or used on a farm in the United States for farming purposes. The tax applies in the case of diesel fuel delivered into the fuel supply tank of a highway vehicle, or special motor fuel delivered into the fuel supply tank of a motor vehicle or motorboat, even if it is known that the liquid fuel is to be used on a farm for farming purposes. Credit or refund of the tax paid in such case may be claimed as provided by section 6427(c) upon proof that the taxable liquid was used on a farm for farming purposes. A tax-free sale of fuel delivered into the fuel supply tank of an aircraft in noncommercial aviation where such fuel is to be used on the farm for farming purposes may be made only if the requirements of § 48.4041-11 are met. The terms “used on a farm for farming purposes”, and related terms, have the same meaning for purposes of the exemption in section 4041(f) and the regulations in this section as these terms are defined in paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of section 6420(c) and the regulations contained in § 48.6420-4.
( b ) *Application of exemption.* The exemption referred to in paragraph (a) of this section does not apply with respect to diesel fuel or special motor fuel or fuel used in noncommercial aviation sold for use or used for nonfarming purposes, or diesel fuel or special motor fuel or fuel used in noncommercial aviation sold for use or used off a farm, regardless of the nature of the use. Thus, if a vehicle, motorboat, or aircraft is used both on a farm and off the farm, or if it is used on a farm both for farming and nonfarming purposes, the exemption applies only with respect to that portion of the diesel fuel or special motor fuel or fuel used in noncommercial aviation which is sold for use or used “on a farm for farming purposes”. For purposes of this exemption, it is immaterial whether or not a vehicle is registered for highway use. However, the actual use of the vehicle and the place where it is used are material. For example, if a truck used on a farm for farming purposes is also used on the highways (even though in connection with operating the farm), tax applies to that diesel fuel or special motor fuel which is sold for use or used in operating the truck on the highways, since the fuel was used off the farm.
( c ) *Termination of exemption.* The exemption referred to in paragraph (a) of this section shall not apply on and after October 1, 1988.
[T.D. 8066, 51 FR 18, Jan. 2, 1986]
**UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD DRIVE ANN ARBOR, MI 48105
- 2498

OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION **November 5 , 20**  **13** MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Meeting with Ford Mot or Company regarding Tier 3 FROM: Michael Olechiw TO: EPA Docket # EPA

- HQ
- OAR
- 2011
- 0135 This memo documents a meeting held on November 5 , 201 3 between representatives of Ford Motor Company an d EPA to discuss Tier 3 US06 PM standards. The agenda as wel l as the attendees are shown below. Th e purpose of the meeting was to clarify points in the Tier 3 rule

. Attendees: Michael Olechiw EPA Todd Rumpsa Ford Jeff Glodich Ford John Hedges Ford Tony Fernandez EPA Matti Maricq Ford Will Ruona Ford Domini c DiCicco Ford Tad Wy sor EPA Don Kopinski EPA David Eiges CARB (b y phone) Joe McDonald EPA (by phone) Agenda US06 PM Standards
Exhibit 35.15



|     |  |  |  |                                                                                                                        
|---- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  |  |  | Corporate Trust Services 
MAC R1204-010 9062 Old
Annapolis Road Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380

Citibank, National Association

388 Greenwich Street 14th floor

New York, NY 10013



|Re: | Annual Statement of Compliance for SG Commercial Mortgage Securities LLC Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-C5
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2016 (the Agreement), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator (Wells Fargo), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the Reporting Period):

(a)A review of Wells Fargos activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such
officers supervision; and

(b)To the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of
its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

February 27, 2017



|              
|--------------
|LOGO          
|BRIAN SMITH   
|Vice President



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Krupp Government Income Trust (the
"Trust") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas
Krupp, Chairman of the Board of the Trust, certify, pursuant to U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Trust as of September 30, 2002 (the last date of the period
            covered by the Report).


/s/ Douglas Krupp
---------------------------
Douglas Krupp,
Chairman of the Board
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 18

- 00540

- CR

Anthony Ruffins , Appellant

v.

The State of Texas , Appellee

FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

NO. CR2016

- 614

, THE HONORABLE DWIGHT E. PESCHEL , JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R A N D M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

Appellant ’ s appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw, explaining that she

currently is no t practi cing law . We gran t th e motion to withdraw, abate the appeal, and remand

t h e matter to the trial court to appoint substitute counsel to represent appellant in this appeal. In

addition, the trial cour t shall order the appropriate supplem ental clerk ’ s record to be pre pared and

for warded to this Court not later than October 13 , 2023

.

It is ordered on September 21, 2023.

Bef or e Chief Justice Byrne, Justices B aker and Kelly

A bated and R emanded

Filed: September 21, 2023

Do Not Publish