alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Russell Golman 

rgolman@gmail.com 

Thank you for allowing me the time to speak out in favor of the clean power plan. My name is Russell 

Golman. I live here in Pittsburgh, in Greenfield. I am a professor of social and decision sciences at 

Carnegie Mellon University. 

Pittsburgh is a wonderful community. It often shows up on lists of the most livable cities in America. I 

look forward to starting a family in this city and living here a long time. Unfortunately, air pollution 

makes Pittsburgh a less healthy home than it has the potential to be. My neighbors, friends, and family 

are all at greater risk for respiratory problems, even for cancer, because of air pollution that comes 

predominantly from coal-fired power plants. 

Renewable energy and higher energy efficiency standards offer us an opportunity to live in a cleaner city 

and have a higher quality of life. But I can't walk down Penn Ave in the strip district and buy cleaner air. 

Even Mayor Peduto can't solve this problem on his own, because the coal plants aren't located here in 

Pittsburgh, although their pollution is. We need the states, coordinated by the EPA at the federal level, 

to act. 

The EPA's clean power plan is a shining example of government- by the people, for the people- at its 

best. There are entrenched special interests that profit from the status quo, selling electricity produced 

by dirty coal without paying for the negative externality they impose on everyone else. But our 

government will not be bought off by these special interests. It serves us all. All Americans will be able 

to breathe a little easier because of the clean power plan. We may slow the pace of climate change and 

leave a more hospitable planet for our children because of the clean power plan. And, by investing in 

renewable energy and energy efficiency technologies, we may stimulate further innovation in these 

fields and grow a clean energy economy because of the clean power plan. I am proud of my 

government today. I am proud to speak out in full support of the EPA's clean power plan.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jamel Blocker, Appellant.

[806 NYS2d 640]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D’Emic, J.), rendered November *6, 2003,*convicting him of aggravated criminal contempt and assault in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the prosecution failed to prove that the complainant sustained a “physical injury” within the meaning of Penal Law § 10.00 (9). Contrary to the People’s contention, this issue is preserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Gray,*86 NY2d 10, 19-21 [1995]; *People v Baez,*13 AD3d 463, 464 [2004]). However, viewing the evidence adduced at trial in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to support the jury’s finding of physical injury. Specifically, the evidence established that the complainant’s injuries included swelling around her left eye, a laceration on her right middle finger that required sutures, bruising on her right breast, swelling on her arms, and bleeding. Also, the evidence established that the complainant experienced severe and pervasive pain while in the ambulance, complained again of pain in the hospital, and was given prescription pain medication, including intravenous morphine. Such evidence was legally sufficient to establish that the complainant suffered “impairment of physical condition or substantial pain” (Penal Law § 10.00 [9]; *see People v Greene,*70 NY2d 860 [1987]; *People v Williams,*203 AD2d 608 [1994]; *People v Crews,*159 AD2d 630 [1990]; *People v Lancia,*150 AD2d 799 [1989]; *cf. Matter of Philip A.,*49 NY2d 198 [1980]).

*576Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see*CPL 470.15 [5]). Goldstein, J.P., Skelos, Fisher and Lunn, JJ., concur.
Order filed September 4, 2014 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00432-CV

____________

LAWRENCE THOMPSON, Appellant

V.

KERRY ALLEN, Appellee

On Appeal from the 61st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2013-10948

O R D E R

This appeal is from a judgment signed December 18, 2013. The notice of 

appeal was filed May 1, 2014. It appears the notice of appeal is untimely but we 

are unable to make that determination because the clerk’s record has not been filed. 

Appellant has filed an affidavit of indigency in this court. Prior to any 

determination of indigency, we must first determine our jurisdiction. Accordingly, 

we enter the following order. 
The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a partial clerk’s record on 

or before September 15, 2014, containing (1) the court’s judgment; (2) any request 

for findings of fact and conclusions of law, any post-judgment motion, and the 

court’s order on the motion; and (3) the notice of appeal.

PER CURIAM
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 1, 2012 

t0529 

Order 

 

June 1, 2012 

145079 & (82) 

COALITION FOR A SAFER DETROIT, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 145079 

 COA: 300516 

Wayne CC: 10-009328-AW 

DETROIT CITY CLERK and DETROIT 

ELECTION COMMISSION, 

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the February 9, 2012 judgment of the Court of 

Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question 

presented should be reviewed by this Court.
§ 514.6 Private pensions and life annuities. ( a ) *Exemption from tax.* Private pensions and life annuities as defined in paragraph (d) of this section, derived from sources within the United States on or after January 1, 1945, and paid to a nonresident alien who is a resident of France are exempt from United States tax under the provisions of Article 8 of the convention of July 25, 1939.
( b ) *Exemption from withholding of United States tax—Form to use.* To secure exemption from withholding of United States tax at the source in the case of private pensions and life annuities, the nonresident alien who is a resident of France shall file Form 1001A-F, in duplicate, with the withholding agent in the United States.
( c ) *Manner of filing.* The provisions of § 514.4 relating to the execution, filing, effective period, and disposal of Form 1001A-F are equally applicable with respect to the income falling within the scope of this section.
( d ) *Definition.* As used in this section, the term “pensions” means periodic payments made in consideration for services rendered or by way of compensation for injuries received, and the term “life annuities” means a stated sum payable periodically at stated times during life, or during a specified number of years, under an obligation to make the payments in return for adequate and full consideration in money or money's worth. Neither term includes retired pay or pensions paid by the United States or by any State or Territory of the United States.
§ 11.412(c)-12 Extension of time to make contributions to satisfy requirements of section 412. ( a ) *In general.* Section 412(c)(10) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 provides that for purposes of section 412 a contribution for a plan year made after the end of such plan year but not later than two and one-half months after the last day of such plan year shall be deemed to have been made on such last day. Section 412(c) (10) further provides that the two and one-half month period may be extended for not more than six months under regulations.
( b ) *Six month extension of two and one-half month period.* ( 1 ) For purposes of section 412 a contribution for a plan year to which section 412 applies that is made not more than eight and one-half months after the end of such plan year shall be deemed to have been made on the last day of such year.
( 2 ) The rules of this section relating to the time a contribution to a plan is deemed made for purposes of the minimum funding standard under section 412 are independent from the rules contained in section 404(a) (6) relating to the time a contribution to a plan is deemed made for purposes of claiming a deduction for such contribution under section 404.
(Sec. 412(c)(10), Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (88 Stat. 917; 26 U.S.C. 412(c)(10)))
[T.D. 7439, 41 FR 46597, Oct. 22, 1976]
NO. 06-14-00109-CR

STATE OF TEXAS § IN THE

§

VS. § 6th COURT

§

MARLO DONTA PERSONS § OF APPEALS

MOTION TO WITHDRAW AFTER APPEAL

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT: 

Now comes Elisha Hollis, Movant and attorney of record for Defendant, 

Marlo Donta Persons, brings this Motion to Withdraw After Appeal as counsel and 

in support thereof shows: 

1. Movant was appointed by the Court to represent Defendant in the 

appeal of this cause. 

2. Defendant, Marlo Donta Persons, was convicted Possession of 

cocaine in an amount of 400 grams or more on June 05, 2014. 

3. The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas affirmed the 

judgment of the trial court on June 02, 2015. 

4. Tara Long, a licensed attorney in Texas is seeking to substitute in to 

represent the Defendant. Defendant request the Court allow Ms. Long to substitute 

in and represent the Defendant in his Petition for Discretionary Review in this 

case. Ms. Long's bar number is 24032680. Her contact information is as follows: 

 2656 South Loop W, Ste. 103 

ACCEPTED

06-14-00109-CR

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

6/17/2015 4:52:47 PM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 6/17/2015 4:52:47 PM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
Houston, TX 75054

Phone: 713-349-8896

Fax: 713-349-8863

5. Movant has advised Defendant of his right to file a Petition for 

Discretionary Review.

6. A copy of this motion will be mailed to the Defendant at his last known 

address: 

Marlo Persons

ID # 1939454

Eastham Unit

2665 Prison Rd. # 1

Lovelady, TX 75851

PRAYER

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Movant prays that the 

Court allow Elisha Hollis to withdraw as counsel for Marlo Donta Persons and 

from any further representation of Marlo Donta Persons in this cause. Defendant 

and Movant further pray the Court Attorney Tara Long to represent Defendant in 

the petition for discretionary review of this case.

Respectfully submitted,

The Law Office of Elisha Hollis

2608 Stonewall Street

Greenville, Texas 75401

Tel: (903) 450-2473

Fax: (903) 200-1290
ElishaHollis@gmail.com

By: /s/ Elisha Hollis

Elisha Hollis

State Bar No. 24083189

Attorney for Marlo Persons

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on June 17, 2015, a true and correct copy of the above 

and foregoing document was served on the District Attorney's Office, Hunt 

County, 2507 Lee Street, Greenville, TX, by hand delivery.

By: /s/ Elisha Hollis

Elisha Hollis

State Bar No. 24083189
www.gpo.gov

### §277d–12. Expenditures for flood fighting, rescue operations, repairs or restoration of flood control or sanitation works threatened or destroyed by floodwaters of Rio Grande, Colorado, or Tijuana Rivers

On and after June 20, 1956, in addition to the funds available under the appropriation “Rio Grande emergency flood protection”, the United States Commissioner is authorized to expend from any appropriation available to the International Boundary and Water Commission, United States and Mexico, American Section, such sums as may be necessary for prosecution of emergency flood fighting and rescue operations, repairs or restoration of any flood control or sanitation works threatened or destroyed by floodwaters of the Rio Grande, the Colorado or Tijuana Rivers, or other streams running across or near the boundary, and for taking emergency actions, consistent with the emergency provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act [42 U.S.C. 300f et seq.], to protect against health threatening surface and ground water pollution problems along the United States-Mexico boundary.

(June 20, 1956, ch. 414, title I, 70 Stat. 302; Pub. L. 101–246, title IV, §412(a), Feb. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 69; Pub. L. 103–236, title IV, §423(b), Apr. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 457.)

#### References in Text

The Safe Drinking Water Act, referred to in text, is title XIV of act July 1, 1944, as added Dec. 16, 1974, Pub. L. 93–523, §2(a), 88 Stat. 1660, as amended, which is classified generally to subchapter XII (§300f et seq.) of chapter 6A of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 201 of Title 42 and Tables.

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–236 substituted “Tijuana Rivers, or other streams running across or near the boundary, and for taking emergency actions, consistent with the emergency provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act, to protect against health threatening surface and ground water pollution problems along the United States-Mexico boundary” for “Tijuana Rivers, and for taking emergency actions to protect against health threatening sanitation problems by repairing or replacing existing capital infrastructure along the United States-Mexico Boundary”.

1990—Pub. L. 101–246 inserted “or sanitation” after “flood control” and inserted before period at end “, the Colorado or Tijuana Rivers, and for taking emergency actions to protect against health threatening sanitation problems by repairing or replacing existing capital infrastructure along the United States-Mexico Boundary”.
# L_2020397DE.01003301.xml

| 26.11.2020 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 397/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2020

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 397/33

---

Berichtigung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) 2019/103 der Kommission vom 23. Januar 2019 zur Änderung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) 2015/1998 in Bezug auf Präzisierung, Harmonisierung und Vereinfachung sowie die Verstärkung bestimmter spezifischer Luftsicherheitsmaßnahmen

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 21 vom 24. Januar 2019
  )

Seite 18, Anhang Nummer 26 zur Änderung von Nummer 11.1 des Anhangs der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) 2015/1998, Nummer 11.1.3 Buchstabe c:

Anstatt:

| „c) | die Prüfung von Lücken bei Beschäftigungs- und Ausbildungszeiten sowie sonstigen Lücken mindestens während der letzten 5 Jahre;“ |
| --- | --- |

„c)

die Prüfung von Lücken bei Beschäftigungs- und Ausbildungszeiten sowie sonstigen Lücken mindestens während der letzten 5 Jahre;“

muss es heißen:

| „c) | die Erfassung aller Beschäftigungsverhältnisse, Aus- und Weiterbildungen und jeglicher Lücken mindestens während der letzten 5 Jahre;“. |
| --- | --- |

„c)

die Erfassung aller Beschäftigungsverhältnisse, Aus- und Weiterbildungen und jeglicher Lücken mindestens während der letzten 5 Jahre;“.

Seite 19, Anhang Nummer 26 zur Änderung von Nummer 11.1 des Anhangs der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) 2015/1998, Nummer 11.1.4 Buchstabe c:

Anstatt:

| „c) | die Prüfung von Lücken bei Beschäftigungs- und Ausbildungszeiten sowie sonstigen Lücken mindestens während der letzten 5 Jahre.“ |
| --- | --- |

„c)

die Prüfung von Lücken bei Beschäftigungs- und Ausbildungszeiten sowie sonstigen Lücken mindestens während der letzten 5 Jahre.“

muss es heißen:

| „c) | die Erfassung aller Beschäftigungsverhältnisse, Aus- und Weiterbildungen und jeglicher Lücken mindestens während der letzten 5 Jahre.“ |
| --- | --- |

„c)

die Erfassung aller Beschäftigungsverhältnisse, Aus- und Weiterbildungen und jeglicher Lücken mindestens während der letzten 5 Jahre.“

---
Exhibit 32.2

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of HQ Sustainable Maritime Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10Q for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, JeanPierre Dallaire, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
SarbanesOxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 14, 2007



/s/ Jean-Pierre DallaireJean-Pierre DallairePrincipal Financial and Accounting Officer
Exhibit
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Properties III L.P.
(the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 29, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, James Hussey, Chief Financial Officer of Richman Housing Credits Inc.,
general partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties III L.P., general partner of
the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
  (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.
  /s/James HusseyJames
      HusseyChief
      Financial Officer of RichmanHousing
      Credits Inc., general partnerof
      Richman Tax Credit Properties IIIL.P.,
      General Partner of the RegistrantNovember
      9, 2009
EXHIBIT 32.1

                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                     OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Giant Industries, Inc.
("Giant") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Fred L. Holliger, Chief Executive Officer of Giant, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (a)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (b)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Giant.


                                       By: /s/ FRED L. HOLLIGER
                                         -------------------------------

                                       Name:   Fred L. Holliger
                                       Title:  Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 4, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 94 Engrossed in House (EH)]

    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 94

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. DEDICATION CEREMONY AND PLACEMENT OF A BUST OF RAOUL 
              WALLENBERG IN THE CAPITOL.

    The rotunda of the Capitol may be used on November 2, 1995, for a 
ceremony incident to the placement of a bust of Raoul Wallenberg in the 
Capitol as previously authorized by Congress.

SEC. 2. SECURITY AND PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall take such action with respect to 
security as may be necessary to carry out section 1. The Architect of 
the Capitol shall make appropriate physical preparations for the 
ceremony referred to in section 1.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 29, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 94

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

  Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a dedication 
ceremony incident to the placement of a bust of Raoul Wallenberg in the 
                                Capitol.
```
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.6231(c)-5 Criminal investigations. ( a ) *In general.* The treatment of items as partnership items with respect to a partner under criminal investigation for violation of the internal revenue laws relating to income tax will interfere with the effective and efficient enforcement of the internal revenue laws. Accordingly, partnership items of such a partner arising in any partnership taxable year ending on or before the last day of the latest taxable year of the partner to which the criminal investigation relates shall be treated as nonpartnership items as of the date on which the partner is notified that the partner is the subject of a criminal investigation and written notification is sent by the Internal Revenue Service that the partner's partnership items shall be treated as nonpartnership items. The partnership items of a partner who is notified that the partner is the subject of a criminal investigation shall not be treated as nonpartnership items under this section unless and until such partner is sent written notification from the Internal Revenue Service of such treatment.
( b ) *Effective date.* This section is applicable to partnership taxable years beginning on or after October 4, 2001. For years beginning prior to October 4, 2001, see § 301.6231(c)-5T contained in 26 CFR part 1, revised April 1, 2001.
[T.D. 8965, 66 FR 50561, Oct. 4, 2001]