alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the quarterly report of AmericanBiogenetic Sciences, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, I, Richard Rubin, CEO and CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Richard RubinCEO, CFO and Chairman

Dated: May 13, 2010

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to American Biogenetic Sciences, Inc. and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 155 (Thursday, August 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 40812]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19429]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[C-570-950]


Wire Decking from the People's Republic of China: Notice of 
Postponement of Preliminary Determination in the Countervailing Duty 
Investigation

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 13, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Copyak, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office 3, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone 202-482-2209.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On July 2, 2009, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
initiated the countervailing duty investigation of wire decking from 
the People's Republic of China. See Wire Decking From the People's 
Republic of China: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigation, 74 
FR 31700 (July 2, 2009).

Postponement of Due Date for Preliminary Determination

    Section 703(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 
requires the Department to issue the preliminary determination in a 
countervailing duty investigation within 65 days after the date on 
which the Department initiated the investigation. However, the 
Department may postpone making the preliminary determination until no 
later than 130 days after the date on which the administering authority 
initiated the investigation if, pursuant to section 703(c)(1)(B) of the 
Act, the Department concludes that the parties concerned in the 
investigation are cooperating and determines that the investigation is 
extraordinarily complicated and that ``additional time is necessary to 
the make the preliminary determination.''
    The Department is currently investigating a number of complex 
alleged subsidy programs, including various loan programs, grants, 
income tax incentives, and the provision of goods and services for less 
than adequate remuneration. Due to the number and complexity of the 
alleged subsidy programs being investigated, we find that this 
investigation is extraordinarily complicated and that additional time 
is necessary to make the preliminary determination. Therefore, in 
accordance with section 703(c)(1)(B) of the Act, we are fully extending 
the due date for the preliminary determination to no later than 130 
days after the day on which the investigation was initiated. The 
deadline for completion of the preliminary determination is now 
November 2, 2009.
    This notice is issued and published pursuant to section 703(c)(2) 
of the Act.

    Dated: August 7, 2009.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-19429 Filed 8-12-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Samuel Dolison, Appellant.

[803 NYS2d 805]

Lahtinen, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lamont, J.), rendered February 24, 2004 in Albany County, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree.

After refusing to accept several plea bargains, defendant pleaded guilty as charged to criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree just prior to the commencement of jury selection for his trial. Supreme Court advised defendant that, because he was required to be sentenced as a second felony offender, a sentence of at least *4xh*to 9 years in prison would have to be imposed. However, the court made a commitment to defendant that the longest sentence it would impose would be 6 to 12 years in prison. Ultimately, the court sentenced defendant to a prison term of 5 to 10 years. Defendant retained his right to appeal and now exercises that right.

Defendant’s failure to move to withdraw his plea or vacate the judgment of conviction renders his challenge to the voluntariness of his plea unpreserved for our review *(see People v Lopez,*71 NY2d 662, 665 [1988]). The exception to the preservation rule is inapplicable as defendant did not make any statements during the plea colloquy which cast significant doubt upon his guilt or the voluntariness of his plea *(see id.).*Regardless, defendant’s affirmative answers to Supreme Court’s in*845quiries sufficiently established the elements of the crimes, that he had not been coerced into pleading guilty and that he understood the proceedings as well as the rights he was relinquishing by pleading guilty (see *People v Coles,*13 AD3d 665, 666 [2004]; *People v Kemp,*288 AD2d 635, 636 [2001]).

The sentence imposed is not harsh and excessive under the circumstances. Indeed, despite defendant’s prior criminal history and pattern of substance abuse, Supreme Court sentenced him to less than the longest potential sentence agreed to upon his plea *(see People v Coles, supra*at 666; *People v Butterfield,*9 AD3d 682, 682 [2004]). Furthermore, the record reveals no extraordinary circumstances warranting modification of the sentence imposed *(see People v Jenkins,*19 AD3d 745, 745 [2005]; *People v Mills, 17*AD3d 712, 713 [2005], *lv denied*5 NY3d 766 [2005]).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
www.gpo.gov

### §286n. Special Drawing Rights

The President is hereby authorized (a) to accept the amendment to the articles of agreement of the International Monetary Fund (hereinafter referred to as the “Fund”), attached to the April 1968 report by the Executive Directors to the Board of Governors of the Fund, for the purpose of (i) establishing a facility based on Special Drawing Rights in the Fund and (ii) giving effect to certain modifications in the present rules and practices of the Fund, and (b) to participate in the special drawing account established by the amendment.

(Pub. L. 90–349, §2, June 19, 1968, 82 Stat. 188.)

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of act July 31, 1945, ch. 339, 59 Stat. 512, known as the Bretton Woods Agreement Act, which comprises this subchapter.

#### Short Title

Section 1 of Pub. L. 90–349 provided: “That this Act [enacting this section and sections 286*o* to 286r of this title and amending sections 412, 415, 417, and 467 of Title 12, Banks and Banking] may be cited as the ‘Special Drawing Rights Act’.”
(logo) pwc

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

To Management of AEGON USARealty Advisors, LLC

 

We have examinedmanagement’s assertion, included in the accompanying *Report onAssessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria Pursuant to Item1122(d) of Regulation AB under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934*, thatAEGON USA Realty Advisors, LLC (“AEGON” or the“Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for thecommercial mortgage backed securities transactions listed in management’sassertion (the “Platform”), as of December 31, 2016 and for theyear then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i),1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(ix),1122(d)(4)(x), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), 1122(d)(4)(xiii),1122(d)(4)(xiv) and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which AEGON has determined are notapplicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform.Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the servicingcriteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’sassertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicableservicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considerednecessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selectedasset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing ofselected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whetherthe Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selectedactivities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedureswere limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed bythe Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were notdesigned to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurredprior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances oramounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by thisreport. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for ouropinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on theCompany’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that AEGON complied with the aforementionedapplicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

February 28, 2017

 

 

*PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,1100 Walnut Street, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106*

*T: (816) 472 7921, F:(816)218 1890,*www.pwc.com/us
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 101 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 101

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To transfer a parcel of land to the Taos Pueblo Indians of New Mexico.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAND TRANSFER.

    (a) Transfer.--The parcel of land described in subsection (b) is 
hereby transferred without consideration to the Secretary of the 
Interior to be held in trust for the Pueblo de Taos. Such parcel shall 
be a part of the Pueblo de Taos Reservation and shall be managed in 
accordance with section 4 of the Act of May 31, 1933 (48 Stat. 108) (as 
amended, including as amended by Public Law 91-550 (84 Stat. 1437)).
    (b) Land Description.--The parcel of land referred to in subsection 
(a) is the land that is generally depicted on the map entitled ``Lands 
transferred to the Pueblo of Taos--proposed'' and dated September 1994, 
comprises 764.33 acres, and is situated within sections 25, 26, 35, and 
36, Township 27 North, Range 14 East, New Mexico Principal Meridian, 
within the Wheeler Peak Wilderness, Carson National Forest, Taos 
County, New Mexico.
    (c) Conforming Boundary Adjustments.--The boundaries of the Carson 
National Forest and the Wheeler Peak Wilderness are hereby adjusted to 
reflect the transfer made by subsection (a).
    (d) Resolution of Outstanding Claims.--The Congress finds and 
declares that, as a result of the enactment of this Act, the Taos 
Pueblo has no unresolved equitable or legal claims against the United 
States on the lands to be held in trust and to become part of the 
Pueblo de Taos Reservation under this section.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 1, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
                                     

104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 H.R. 101

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To transfer a parcel of land to the Taos Pueblo Indians of New Mexico.
```
IA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 37

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to provide

for a balanced budget for the United States Government.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. ORTON introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States to provide for a balanced budget for the United

States Government.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution if ratified

7 by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States

8 within seven years after its submission to the States for

9 ratification:
2

HJ 37 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE—

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. Total outlays of the United States for

3 any fiscal year shall not exceed total receipts to the United

4 States for that fiscal year.

5 ‘‘SECTION 2. Prior to each fiscal year, the President

6 shall transmit to the Congress a proposed budget for the

7 United States Government for that fiscal year in which

8 total outlays do not exceed total receipts.

9 ‘‘SECTION 3. For any fiscal year in which actual out10 lays exceed actual receipts, the Congress shall provide by

11 law for the repayment in the ensuing fiscal year of such

12 excess outlays. If Congress fails to provide by law for re13 payment, within fifteen days after Congress adjourns to

14 end a session, there shall be a sequestration of all outlays

15 to eliminate a budget deficit.

16 ‘‘SECTION 4. The provisions of this article may be

17 waived for any fiscal year only if Congress so provides by

18 law by a majority of the whole number of each House.

19 Such waiver shall be subject to veto by the President.

20 ‘‘SECTION 5. Total receipts shall include all receipts

21 of the United States Government except those derived

22 from borrowing. Total outlays shall include all outlays of

23 the United States Government, except for those for repay24 ment of debt principal.
3

HJ 37 IH

1 ‘‘SECTION 6. This article shall take effect beginning

2 with fiscal year 2002 or with the second fiscal year begin3 ning after its ratification, whichever is later.’’.

Æ
www.gpo.gov

### §262k–1. Transparency of budgets

#### (a) Limitation

Beginning three years after September 30, 1996, the Secretary of the Treasury shall instruct the United States Executive Director of each international financial institution to use the voice and vote of the United States to oppose any loan or other utilization of the funds of their respective institution, other than to address basic human needs, for the government of any country which the Secretary of the Treasury determines—

(1) does not have in place a functioning system for reporting to civilian authorities audits of receipts and expenditures that fund activities of the armed forces and security forces;

(2) has not provided to the institution information about the audit process requested by the institution.

#### (b) “International financial institution” defined

For purposes of this section, the term “international financial institution” shall include the institutions identified in section 532(b) of this Act.

(Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title I, §101(c) [title V, §576], Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–121, 3009–168; Pub. L. 105–118, title V, §572, Nov. 26, 1997, 111 Stat. 2430.)

#### References in Text

Section 532(b) of this Act, referred to in subsec. (b), is section 532(b) of Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title I, §101(c) [title V], Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–121, 3009–152, which is not classified to the Code.

#### Amendments

1997—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 105–118, §572(a), amended par. (1) generally. Prior to amendment, par. (1) read as follows: “does not have in place a functioning system for a civilian audit of all receipts and expenditures that fund activities of the armed forces and security forces;”.

Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 105–118, §572(b), amended par. (2) generally. Prior to amendment, par. (2) read as follows: “has not provided a summary of a current audit to the institution.”
PUBLIC LAW 111–342—DEC. 22, 2010 124 STAT. 3607 

Public Law 111–342 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to prevent the proceeds or instrumentalities 

of foreign crime located in the United States from being shielded from foreign 

forfeiture proceedings. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preserving Foreign Criminal 

Assets for Forfeiture Act of 2010’’. 

SEC. 2. PRESERVATION OF PROPERTY SUBJECT TO FORFEITURE 

UNDER FOREIGN LAW. 

Section 2467(d)(3)(A) of title 28, United States Code, is amended 

to read as follows: 

‘‘(A) RESTRAINING ORDERS.— 

‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—To preserve the availability of 

property subject to civil or criminal forfeiture under 

foreign law, the Government may apply for, and the 

court may issue, a restraining order at any time before 

or after the initiation of forfeiture proceedings by a 

foreign nation. 

‘‘(ii) PROCEDURES.— 

‘‘(I) IN GENERAL.—A restraining order under 

this subparagraph shall be issued in a manner 

consistent with subparagraphs (A), (C), and (E) 

of paragraph (1) and the procedural due process 

protections for a restraining order under section 

983(j) of title 18. 

‘‘(II) APPLICATION.—For purposes of applying 

such section 983(j)— 

‘‘(aa) references in such section 983(j) to 

civil forfeiture or the filing of a complaint shall 

be deemed to refer to the applicable foreign 

criminal or forfeiture proceedings; and 

Preserving 

Foreign 

Criminal Assets 

for Forfeiture 

Act of 2010. 

28 USC 1 note. 

Dec. 22, 2010 

[S. 4005] 


dkrause on GSDDPC29PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
124 STAT. 3608 PUBLIC LAW 111–342—DEC. 22, 2010 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 4005: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010): 

Dec. 14, considered and passed Senate. 

Dec. 16, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

‘‘(bb) the reference in paragraph (1)(B)(i) 

of such section 983(j) to the United States 

shall be deemed to refer to the foreign nation.’’. 

Approved December 22, 2010. 


dkrause on GSDDPC29PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.7216-0 Table of contents.

This section lists captions contained in §§ 301.7216-1 through 301.7216-3.

## § 301.7216-1 Penalty for disclosure or use of tax return information.

(a) In general.

(b) Definitions.

(c) Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act.

(d) Effective date.

## § 301.7216-2 Permissible disclosures or uses without consent of the taxpayer.

(a) Disclosure pursuant to other provisions of the Internal Revenue Code.

(b) Disclosures to the IRS.

(c) Disclosures or uses for preparation of a taxpayer's return.

(d) Disclosures to other tax return preparers.

(e) Disclosure or use of information in the case of related taxpayers.

(f) Disclosure pursuant to an order of a court, or an administrative order, demand, request, summons or subpoena which is issued in the performance of its duties by a Federal or State agency, the United States Congress, a professional association ethics committee or board, or the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.

(g) Disclosure for use in securing legal advice, Treasury investigations or court proceedings.

(h) Certain disclosures by attorneys and accountants.

(i) Corporate fiduciaries.

(j) Disclosure to taxpayer's fiduciary.

(k) Disclosure or use of information in preparation or audit of State or local tax returns or assisting a taxpayer with foreign country tax obligations.

(l) Payment for tax preparation services.

(m) Retention of records.

(n) Lists for solicitation of tax return preparation business.

(o) Producing statistical information in connection with tax return preparation business.

(p) Disclosure or use of information for quality, peer, or conflict reviews.

(q) Disclosure to report the commission of a crime.

(r) Disclosure of tax return information due to a tax return preparer's incapacity or death.

(s) Effective date.

## § 301.7216-3 Disclosure or use permitted only with the taxpayer's consent.

(a) In general.

(b) Timing requirements and limitations.

(c) Special rules.

(d) Effective date.

[T.D. 9375, 73 FR 1067, Jan. 7, 2008, as amended by T.D. 9478, 75 FR 52, Jan. 4, 2010; T.D. 9608, 77 FR 76403, Dec. 28, 2012]
# Jurnalul Oficial L 281/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0782 |
| --- | --- |
| Jurnalul Oficial
  al Uniunii Europene | L 281 |
| | |
| Ediţia în limba română | Legislaţie | Anul 6328 august 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0782

Jurnalul Oficial

al Uniunii Europene

L 281

Ediţia în limba română

Legislaţie

Anul 6328 august 2020

---

| Cuprins | | II   Acte fără caracter legislativ | Pagina |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | ACORDURI INTERNAŢIONALE |
| | * | Informare privind intrarea în vigoare a Acordului privind încetarea tratatelor bilaterale de investiții dintre statele membre ale Uniunii Europene | 1 |

Cuprins

II   Acte fără caracter legislativ

Pagina

ACORDURI INTERNAŢIONALE

*

Informare privind intrarea în vigoare a Acordului privind încetarea tratatelor bilaterale de investiții dintre statele membre ale Uniunii Europene

1

| RO | Actele ale căror titluri sunt tipărite cu caractere drepte sunt acte de gestionare curentă adoptate în cadrul politicii agricole şi care au, în general, o perioadă de valabilitate limitată.
  Titlurile celorlalte acte sunt tipărite cu caractere aldine şi sunt precedate de un asterisc. |
| --- | --- |

RO

Actele ale căror titluri sunt tipărite cu caractere drepte sunt acte de gestionare curentă adoptate în cadrul politicii agricole şi care au, în general, o perioadă de valabilitate limitată.

Titlurile celorlalte acte sunt tipărite cu caractere aldine şi sunt precedate de un asterisc.

---

II Acte fără caracter legislativ

ACORDURI INTERNAŢIONALE

| 28.8.2020 | RO | Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene | L 281/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2020

RO

Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene

L 281/1

---

Informare privind intrarea în vigoare a Acordului privind încetarea tratatelor bilaterale de investiții dintre statele membre ale Uniunii Europene

Acordul privind încetarea tratatelor bilaterale de investiții dintre statele membre ale Uniunii Europene, semnat la Bruxelles la 5 mai 2020
   (1), va intra în vigoare la 29 august 2020, în conformitate cu articolul 16 alineatul (1) din acord.

1

---

(1)  
  JO L 169, 29.5.2020.

1

---