alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 .
  1.
    
    the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the
periods presented in the Form 10-Q.
 Date:  November 14, 2008
    /s/ J. Marcus ScrudderJ. MARCUS SCRUDDERChief Executive Officer 3
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                0
<CASH>                                         576,881
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,959,945
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    8,876,626
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               13,387,881 
<PP&E>                                         2,324,726
<DEPRECIATION>                                 769,578
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 30,184,786
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          13,063,235
<BONDS>                                        5,655,231
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    485
<COMMON>                                       321,641
<OTHER-SE>                                     10,442,368
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   30,184,786
<SALES>                                        1,783,857
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,834,515
<CGS>                                          2,707,667
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  6,602,995
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               90,663
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             116,487
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,794,304)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,794,304)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,794,304)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        



</TABLE>
#### § 31.6674-1 Penalties for fraudulent statement or failure to furnish statement.

Any person required to furnish a statement to an employee under the provisions of section 6051 or 6053(b) is subject to a civil penalty for willful failure to furnish such statement in the manner, at the time, and showing the information required under such section (or § 31.6051-1 or § 31.6053-2), or for willfully furnishing a false or fraudulent statement to an employee. The penalty for each such violation is $50, which shall be assessed and collected in the same manner as the tax imposed on employers under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act. See section 7204 for criminal penalty.

[T.D. 7001, 34 FR 1006, Jan. 23, 1969]
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.7507-1 Banks and trust companies covered. ( a ) Section 7507 applies to any national bank, or bank or trust company organized under State law, a substantial portion of the business of which consists of receiving deposits and making loans and discounts, and which has— ( 1 ) Ceased to do business by reason of insolvency or bankruptcy, or
( 2 ) Been released or discharged from its liability to its depositors for any part of their deposit claims, and the depositors have accepted in lieu thereof a lien upon its subsequent earnings or claims against its assets either ( i ) segregated and held by it for benefit of the depositors or
( ii ) transferred to an individual or corporate trustee or agent who liquidates, holds or operates the assets for the benefit of the depositors.
( b ) As used in this section and §§ 301.7507-2 to 301.7507-11, inclusive: ( 1 ) The term *bank,* unless otherwise indicated by the context, means any national bank, or bank or trust company organized under State law, within the scope of section 7507.
( 2 ) The terms *statute of limitations* and *limitations* mean all applicable provisions of law (including section 7507) which impose, change, or affect the limitations, conditions, or requirements relative to the allowance of refunds and abatements or the assessment or collection of tax, as the case may be.
( 3 ) The term *segregated assets* includes transferred or trusteed assets, or assets set aside or earmarked, to all or a portion of which, or the proceeds of which, the depositors are absolutely or conditionally entitled.
( 4 ) The term *ceased to do business* means the bank no longer accepts deposits or makes loans and discounts, and is winding up its affairs and is in the process of liquidating its assets to pay depositors. A bank will not be considered to have ceased to do business on account of a transaction in which the bank— ( i ) Transfers assets and liabilities to a Bridge Bank in a transfer described in § 1.597-4 of this chapter;
( ii ) Transfers assets and liabilities to any person in a transaction to which section 381(a) applies or in which the transferee receives property with a transferred basis;
( iii ) Transfers assets or liabilities to any person in a transaction in which Federal Financial Assistance (as defined in section 597) is provided to any party to the transaction, unless all the Federal Financial Assistance is deposit insurance under § 301.7507-9(d); or
( iv ) Transfers assets or liabilities to any person in a transaction similar to any transaction described in paragraphs (b)(4)(i) through (iii) of this section. This paragraph (b)(4) applies to taxable years ending on or after April 22, 1992.
[32 FR 15241, Nov. 3, 1967, as amended by T.D. 8641, 60 FR 66105, Dec. 21, 1995]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6164
MILTON C. INCIARTE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHN HAHN, Warden, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-95-1490-A) Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: May 3, 1996 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Milton C. Inciarte, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denyingreconsideration of an order denying Appellant's motion for a preliminary injunction. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Inciarte v. Hahn , No. CA-95-1490-A (E.D. Va. Dec. 8, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 143.2 Taxes on self-dealing; scholarship and fellowship grants by private foundations. ( a ) *In general.* Section 4941(d)(1)(D) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 as added by section 101(b) of the Tax Reform Act of 1969 (83 Stat. 500) provides that the term “self-dealing” includes any direct or indirect payment of compensation (or payment or reimbursement of expenses) by a private foundation to a disqualified person. Section 4941(d)(1)(E) provides that the term “self-dealing” includes any direct or indirect transfer to, or use by, or for the benefit of, a disqualified person of the income or assets of a private foundation.
( b ) *Scholarship and fellowship grants.* A scholarship or fellowship grant to a person other than a Government official paid or incurred by a private foundation in accordance with a program which is consistent with the allowance of a deduction under section 170 for contributions made to such private foundation shall not constitute an act of self-dealing. For example, a scholarship or fellowship grant made by a private foundation in accordance with a program to award scholarship or fellowship grants to the children of employees of the donor shall not constitute an act of self-dealing if the private foundation has, after disclosure of the method of carrying out such program, received a ruling or determination letter stating that it is exempt from taxation under section 501(c)(3) and that contributions to the private foundation are deductible by the donor under section 170.
[T.D. 7030, 35 FR 4293, Mar. 10, 1970]
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

** Bailey v. United States , 516 U.S. 137, 150 (1995).

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-50973 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus GARY DWAYNE ALLBRIGHT, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-97-CA-123 (SA-94-CR-58-1)

- - - - - - - - - - April 23, 1999 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Gary Dwayne Allbright, federal inmate #63846-080, appeals the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. He argues that his 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) conviction should be vacated because the jury received an erroneous pre- Bailey ** instruction on “using” and therefore, the jury could have convicted him for mere possession of firearms. We have carefully reviewed the arguments and the appellate record. For essentially the same reasons as given bythe district court, see United States v. Allbright , No. SA-97-CA123 (W.D. Tex. Oct. 28, 1997), we conclude that Allbright is not entitled to relief on the jury-instruction claim. See United States v. Brown , 161 F.3d 256, 259 (5th Cir. 1998) (en banc); United States v. Hall , 110 F.3d 1155, 1162 (5th Cir. 1997); United States v. Shaid , 937 F.2d 228, 232 (5th Cir. 1991) (en banc). AFFIRMED.
# LI2019085EN.01006901.xml

| 27.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | LI 85/69 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

LI 85/69

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2019/216 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 January 2019 on the apportionment of tariff rate quotas included in the WTO schedule of the Union following the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union, and amending Council Regulation (EC) No 32/2000

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 38 of 8 February 2019
  )

On page 18, Annex, Part A, in the table, 11th row (relating to order number 094166):

for:

| ‘Semi-milled or wholly milled rice | t | 25 516 | OT | 094166 | 88 % | 22 442 ’ |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |

‘Semi-milled or wholly milled rice

t

25 516

OT

094166

88 %

22 442 ’

read:

| ‘Semi-milled or wholly milled rice | t | 25 516 | EO | 094166 | 88 % | 22 442 ’ |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |

‘Semi-milled or wholly milled rice

t

25 516

EO

094166

88 %

22 442 ’

---
§ 31.3402(b)-1 Percentage method of withholding. ( a ) *Percentage method of withholding.* The amount of tax to be deducted and withheld from an employee's wages under the percentage method of withholding is determined based on the entry for the employee's anticipated filing status or marital status and other entries on the employee's withholding allowance certificate using the applicable percentage method tables and computational procedures set forth in the applicable forms, instructions, publications, and other guidance prescribed by the Commissioner issued with respect to the period in which wages are paid.
( b ) *Applicability date.* The provisions of this section apply on and after October 6, 2020. Taxpayers may choose to apply this section on or after January 1, 2020 and before October 6, 2020. For rules that apply before October 6, 2020, see 26 CFR part 31, revised as of April 1, 2020.
[T.D. 9924, 85 FR 63026, Oct. 6, 2020]
**AD Economic Evaluation**



### Docket No . FAA - 2007 - 28229 Directorate ID : 2006 - SW - 23 - AD Helicopter Model: Eurocopter France Model EC 130 B4 Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 73 Helicopters in the US Registry . R eason : The actions of this AD are intended to detect debonding between the twist grip drive tubes and the control pinions on the pilot and co - pilot collective levers to prevent loss of cockpit throttle control of the engine, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $8,651 for a co -pilot twist grip assembly $12,542 for a pilot twist grip assembly $5 for a clamp$2 for a bolt $1 for a nut Labor per Helicopter * ( 0.25 work- hour x 

### $ 8 0 /work hour for the debonding inspection ) (2 work- hour x 

### $80/work hour for the collective replacement) $ 20 $160 Other (Explain) *average labor rate of $80 per work - hour used at the time of the AD publication Total Cost per Helicopter $20 for the debonding inspection $160 for the collect ive replacement (labor) $8,651 for a co -pilot twist grip assembly (part) $12,542 for a pilot twist grip assembly (part) $5 for a clamp$2 for a bolt (part) $1 for a nut (part) Total US Fleet Cost $ 1,460 for the debonding inspection Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact o n a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Ed Cuevas
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 18 (Thursday, January 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 5159]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1937]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than February 23, 2009.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Ivan Hurwitz, Bank 
Applications Officer) 33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001:
    1. Max Bancorp, LLC, New York, New York, to become a bank holding 
company by acquiring at least 50 percent of the voting shares of 
Allegiance Community Bank, South Orange, New Jersey.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 26, 
2009.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-1937 Filed 1-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
exv10w12wi



 






Exhibit 10.12 (i)



Date: April 6th, 2006




To:

Ms. Ora Setter




Re: Indemnification for VAT payments



Dear Madam,



On November 30, 2005 you were appointed to serve as an External Director of TopSpin Medical Inc.
(“TopSpin”). On November 7, 2005 the Board of Directors of TopSpin approved that each of the
External Directors of TopSpin will be entitled to certain considerations for the services provided
by them to TopSpin in such capacity (the “Consideration”).



After consulting with its tax advisors, no Value Added Taxes (“VAT”) should be born by you with
respect to the Consideration.



This letter is to confirm to you TopSpin’s undertaking, that if you will be required by the Israeli
tax authorities to pay VAT with respect to the Consideration, TopSpin will indemnify you with
respect to such amounts, subject to any applicable law, TopSpin incorporation documents and to the
following terms: (a) you will inform TopSpin immediately and in writing after you become aware of
any claim, demand or other action or proceeding (actual or potential), if a claim for
indemnification in respect thereof can be made by you under this letter (“Claim”); and (2) TopSpin
will be entitled to defend and settle, on your behalf, such Claim, and you will assist TopSpin to
defense or settle such Claim, including, without limitation, by issuing authorization letters or
proxies to TopSpin and its professional advisors to act on you behalf.



Our agreement is conditioned upon you acceptance of the terms of indemnification with your
signature hereunder.



Sincerely yours,



TopSpin Medical Inc.




I agree:





/s/ Ora Setter

Ora Setter
§ 54.4975-14 Election to pay an excise tax for certain pre-1975 prohibited transactions. ( a ) *In general.* Section 2003(c)(1)(B) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (88 Stat. 978) provides an election to pay an excise tax by certain persons involved prior to 1975 in prohibited transactions within the meaning of section 503 (b) or (g).
( b ) *Effect of election.* If a valid election is made under this section with respect to a particular transaction, any loss of exemption under section 501(a) because of a prohibited transaction within the meaning of section 503 (b) or (g) shall not apply. Instead, the person who made the election referred to in this section shall be subject to the taxes which would have been imposed by section 4975 (a) or (b) as though section 4975 had imposed a tax in respect of the transaction. (However, section 4975(f)(1), relating to joint and several liability, shall not apply to any person who has not made an election under this section, and interest for late payment of tax shall not begin to accrue until after the date of the election.) Such an election is irrevocable. However, the making of the election does not affect the application of section 6501 for purposes of assessment and collection of tax and section 6511 for purposes of filing a claim for credit or refund with respect to taxpayers and to taxable years of taxpayers whose tax liability is or may be affected by reason of the nonapplication of a denial of exempt status.
( c ) *Method of election.* A person shall make the election referred to in this section by filing the form issued for such purpose by the Internal Revenue Service, including therein the information required by such form and the instructions issued with respect thereto, and by paying the tax which the taxpayer indicates is due at the time the return is filed. To be valid the election must be made prior to the later of December 6, 1976, or 120 days after the date of notification referred to in § 1.503(a)-1(b) of this chapter (Income Tax Regulations), relating to loss of exemption for certain prohibited transactions. If there has been no notification of loss of exemption, the election may be made at any time. However, these limitations do not preclude an agreement between the disqualified person and the district director to extend the time within which the election is permitted.
( d ) *Computation of section 4975 excise tax.* To the extent applicable, and solely for purposes associated with the payment of a section 4975 excise tax under the election referred to in this section, § 53.4941(e)-1 of this chapter (Foundation Excise Tax Regulations) is controlling.
(Sec. 2003(c)(1)(B) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (88 Stat. 978))
[T.D. 7489, 42 FR 27882, June 1, 1977]
§ 31.6053-2 Employer statement of uncollected employee tax. ( a ) *Requirement that statement be furnished.* If— ( 1 ) The amount of the employee tax imposed by section 3101 in respect of tips reported by an employee to his employer pursuant to section 6053(a) (see § 31.6053-1) exceeds
( 2 ) The amount of employee tax imposed by section 3101 in respect of such tips which can be collected by the employer from wages (exclusive of tips) of such employee or from funds furnished to the employer by the employee, the employer shall furnish to the employee a statement showing the amount of the excess. For provisions relating to the collection of, and liability for, employee tax on tips, see § 31.3102-3.
( b ) *Form of statement.* Form W-2 is the form prescribed for use in furnishing the statement required by paragraph (a) of this section, except that if an employer files a composite return pursuant to § 31.6011(a)-8 he may furnish to the employee, in lieu of Form W-2, a statement containing the required information in a form suitable for retention by the employee. A statement is required under this section in respect of an excess referred to in paragraph (a) of this section, even though the employer may not be required to furnish a statement to the employee under § 31.6051. Provisions applicable to the furnishing of a statement under § 31.6051 shall be applicable to statements under this section.
( c ) *Excess to be shown on statement.* If there is an excess in respect of the tips reported by an employee in two or more statements furnished pursuant to section 6053(a), only the total excess for the period covered by the employer statement shall be shown on such statement.
[T.D. 7001, 34 FR 1005, Jan. 23, 1969, as amended by T.D. 7351, 40 FR 17145, Apr. 17, 1975]