alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Fl  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Referenceis hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as ofNovember 1, 2016, by and among GS MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORPORATION II, asDepositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, MIDLANDLOAN SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION , as GeneralSpecial Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as AMA Plaza SpecialServicer, AEGON USA REALTY ADVISORS, LLC, as 225 Bush Street Special Servicer,WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator,WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee and PARK BRIDGE LENDERSERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and as Asset Representations Reviewer withrespect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2016-GS4 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuantto Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Marthinsen, Managing Director ofSpecial Servicing do hereby certify that:

 

1.       Areview of the activities of the AMA Plaza Special Servicer during the periodfrom January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and ofits performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.       To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the AMA Plaza Special Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28thday of February 2018.

 

 

/s/DanielMarthinsen

DanielMarthinsen

ManagingDirector 

WellsFargo Bank

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tariq Jones, Appellant.

[803 NYS2d 920]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (J. Goldberg, J.), rendered October 24, 2002, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (s*ee People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, resolution of issues of credibility, as *497well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses *(see People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94 [1903]). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see People v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86, 88 [1974]). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see*CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. S. Miller, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Covello, JJ., concur.
(logo) GREYSTONE

 

C-III ASSET MANAGEMENT LLCd/b/a

GREYSTONE SPECIAL SERVICING

5221 N. O’Connor Blvd., Suite800

Irving, Texas 75039

Phone: 972-868-5300

Fax: 972-868-5303

 

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

**C-III Asset Management LLC**

 

The undersigned, Barry Davis,Vice President of C-III Asset Management LLC, the current Special Servicerunder that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1,2016, relating to the **Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust 2016-LC25, CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-LC25** (the “Pooling andServicing Agreement”), hereby certifies as follows:

 

1.  a review of theactivities of the Special Servicer and of its performance under the Pooling andServicing Agreement during a portion of the preceding calendar year 2019 (the“Reporting Period”) has been made under the undersigned’s supervision;

 

2.  to the best of theundersigned’s knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer maintainedan effective internal control system relating to its servicing of the MortgageLoans serviced by it and has fulfilled in all material respects its obligationsunder the Pooling and Servicing Agreement throughout the Reporting Period.

 

Capitalized terms nototherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given them in the Pooling andServicing Agreement.

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, as of the 1st day of March, 2020, I have hereuntosigned my name.

 

/s/ Barry Davis

**Barry Davis**, Vice President
#### § 31.3121(a)(18)-1 Payments or benefits under a qualified educational assistance program.

The term “wages” does not include any payment made, or benefit furnished, to or for the benefit of an employee in a taxable year beginning after December 31, 1978, if at the time of such payment or furnishing it is reasonable to believe that the employee will be able to exclude such payment or benefit from income under section 127.

[T.D. 7898, 48 FR 31019, July 6, 1983]
Exhibit
10.98


TRADEMARK
LICENSE EXTENSION AGREEMENT


This Extension Agreement
dated as of April 10, 2006 is by and between Hallmark Licensing, Inc. (“Hallmark
Licensing”) and Crown Media United States, LLC (“Crown US”).


WHEREAS, Crown US and
Hallmark Licensing have previously entered into that certain Movie Channel
Trademark License Agreement between the parties dated as of January 1, 2004, as
extended as of August 1, 2004, and as of August 1, 2005 (the “License Agreement”);
and


WHEREAS, the parties
desire to further extend the term of the License Agreement;


NOW, THEREFORE, Crown US
and Hallmark Licensing hereby agree as follows:


The term of the License
Agreement shall be extended for an additional period terminating on September
1, 2007, subject to any earlier termination pursuant to the terms of the
License Agreement.


All other terms and
conditions of the License Agreement will remain unchanged and in full force and
effect.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties hereto have executed this Extension Agreement as of the date set forth
above.


	
  HALLMARK LICENSING, INC.

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  

  /s/ Deanne Stedem

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  



  
	
  Title: 

  	
  Vice President

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  CROWN MEDIA UNITED STATES, LLC

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By: 

  	
  

  /s/ C. Stanford

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  



  
	
  Title: 

  	
  Vice President
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1011 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 233
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1011

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 14, 1995

            Received; read twice and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act applicable to the 
     construction of a hydroelectric project in the State of Ohio.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE.

    Notwithstanding the time limitations of section 13 of the Federal 
Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 
upon the request of the licensee for FERC Project No. 9423 (and after 
reasonable notice), is authorized, in accordance with the good faith, 
due diligence, and public interest requirements of such section 13 and 
the Commission's procedures under such section, to extend the time 
required for commencement of construction for the project for up to a 
maximum of 3 consecutive 2-year periods. This section shall take effect 
for the project upon the expiration of the extension (issued by the 
Commission under such section 13) of the period required for 
commencement of construction of such project.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 13, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 233

104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1011

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act applicable to the 
     construction of a hydroelectric project in the State of Ohio.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 14, 1995

            Received; read twice and placed on the calendar
```
#### Alina Briano, Respondent, v LKT Transport et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

[805 NYS2d 584]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants LKT Transport and David Le appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Solomon, J.), dated October 13, 2004, which denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 3113 to permit David Le to be deposed by open commission, and granted the plaintiff’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3126 to preclude them from offering any testimony or evidence at trial to the extent of precluding them from testifying at trial regarding liability and the “accident’s impact upon damages,” in the event they failed to produce a representative for deposition within 60 days.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The nature and degree of a penalty imposed pursuant to CPLR 3126 for failure to comply with discovery is within the trial court’s discretion *(see Razmilovic v Dowd,*14 AD3d 546 [2005]). The appellants failed to appear for a court-ordered deposition. Under the circumstances, the court providently exercised its discretion in directing the appellants to appear for depositions within 60 days or be precluded from testifying at trial *(see Razmilovic v Dowd, supra; Reyes v Vanderbilt,*303 AD2d 391, 392 [2003]).

The appellants’ remaining contentions are without merit. H. Miller, J.P., Crane, Krausman, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of availability.

# SUMMARY:

On August 4, 2009, in accordance with 16 U.S.C. 127 1-1287 (section 3(b) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act), the USDA Forest Service, Washington Office, transmitted the final boundaries of the North Fork Smith and Upper Rogue National Wild and Scenic Rivers to Congress. As specified by law, the boundaries will not be effective until ninety days after Congress receives the transmittal.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Information may be obtained by contacting the Rogue River Siskiyou National Forest, P.O. Box 520, Medford, Oregon 97501, 541-858-2200.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The North Fork Smith and Upper Rogue National Wild and Scenic Rivers boundaries are available for review at the following offices: USDA Forest Service, Recreation, Yates Building, 14th and Independence Avenues, SW., Washington, DC 20024; USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, 333 SW. 1st Ave., Portland, OR 97208; and, Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest, 333 West 8th Street, Medford, Oregon.

The Omnibus Oregon Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1988 (Pub. L. 100-557) of October 28, 1988, designated the North Fork Smith and the Upper Rogue River, Oregon, as National Wild and Scenic Rivers, to be administered by the Secretary of Agriculture.

Dated: August 7, 2009.

Claire Lavendel,

Regional Director of Recreation, Lands and Minerals.

[FR Doc. E9-19512 Filed 8-17-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1009 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1009

                   For the relief of Lloyd B. Gamble.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 21, 1995

  Mr. Davis introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                   For the relief of Lloyd B. Gamble.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS.

    (a) Payment.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of any 
money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to Lloyd B. Gamble of 
Fairfax, Virginia, the sum of $253,488.
    (b) Basis.--The payment required by subsection (a) shall be to 
compensate Lloyd B. Gamble for the injuries sustained by him as a 
result of the administration to him, without his knowledge, of lysergic 
acid diethylamide by United States Army personnel in 1957.

SEC. 2. SATISFACTION OF CLAIMS.

    The payment made pursuant to section 1 shall be in full 
satisfaction of all claims Lloyd B. Gamble may have against the United 
States for any injury described in such section.

SEC. 3. INELIGIBILITY FOR ADDITIONAL BENEFITS.

    Upon payment of the sum referred to in section 1, Lloyd B. Gamble 
shall not be eligible for any compensation or benefits from the 
Department of Veterans Affairs or the Department of Defense for any 
injury described in such section.

SEC. 4. LIMITATION OF AGENTS AND ATTORNEYS FEES.

    It shall be unlawful for an amount of more than 10 percent of the 
amount paid pursuant to section 1 to be paid to or received by any 
agent or attorney for any service rendered to Lloyd B. Gamble in 
connection with the benefits provided by this Act. Any person who 
violates this section shall be guilty of an infraction and shall be 
subject to a fine in the amount provided in title 18, United States 
Code.
                                 <all>
```
www.gpo.gov

### §290*l*–4. Subscription of stock

#### (a) Subscription authority

#### (1) In general

The Secretary of the Treasury may subscribe on behalf of the United States to 100,000 shares of the capital stock of the Bank.

#### (2) Effectiveness of subscription commitment

Any commitment to make such subscription shall be effective only to such extent or in such amounts as are provided for in advance by appropriations Acts.

#### (b) Limitations on authorization of appropriations

For payment by the Secretary of the Treasury of the subscription of the United States for shares described in subsection (a) of this section, there are authorized to be appropriated $1,167,010,000 without fiscal year limitation.

#### (c) Disposition of net income distributions by Bank

Any payment made to the United States by the Bank as a distribution of net income shall be covered into the Treasury as a miscellaneous receipt.

(Pub. L. 101–513, title V, §562(c)(6), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 2034.)

#### Codification

Subsecs. (a) to (c) were in the original (A) to (C), respectively, and pars. (1) and (2) of subsec. (a) were in the original (i) and (ii), respectively, and were editorially redesignated for purposes of codification.

#### First General Capital Increase

Pub. L. 105–118, title V, §560(a), Nov. 26, 1997, 111 Stat. 2425, provided in part that the Secretary of the Treasury may, to effect the United States participation in the first general capital increase of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, subscribe to and make payment for 100,000 additional shares of the capital stock of the Bank on behalf of the United States, and authorized $285,772,500 for paid-in capital and $984,327,500 for callable capital of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development to be appropriated without fiscal year limitation, subject to obtaining the necessary appropriations.
ROCKY EUGENE JACKSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-4668

_____________________________/

Opinion filed June 5, 2017.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County.

Keith Brace, Judge.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, 

Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, ROWE, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsBuckling Test Results and Preliminary Test and Analysis Correlation from the 8-Foot-Diameter Orthogrid-Stiffened Cylinder Test Article TA02Results from the testing of cylinder test article SBKF-P2-CYL-TA02 (referred to herein as TA02) are presented. TA02 is an 8-foot-diameter (96-inches), 78.0-inch-long, aluminum-lithium (Al-Li), orthogrid-stiffened cylindrical shell similar to those used in current state-of-the-art launch-vehicle structures and was designed to exhibit global buckling when subjected to combined compression and bending loads. The testing was conducted at the Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC), February 3-6, 2009, in support of the Shell Buckling Knockdown Factor Project (SBKF). The test was used to verify the performance of a newly constructed buckling test facility at MSFC and to verify the test article design and analysis approach used by the SBKF researchers.Document ID20170005857Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsHilburger, Mark W.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Waters, W. Allen, Jr.*(Analytical Mechanics Associates, Inc. Hampton, VA, United States)*Haynie, Waddy T.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Thornburgh, Robert P*(Army Research Lab. Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredJune 28, 2017Publication DateMarch 1, 2017Subject CategorySpace Transportation And SafetyReport/Patent NumberNASA/TP-2017-219587NF1676L-26704L-20801Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 869021.04.07.01.13Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20170005857.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 48.4223-1 Special rules relating to further manufacture. ( a ) *Purchasing manufacturer to be treated as the manufacturer.* For purposes of Chapter 32, a manufacturer or producer to whom an article is sold or resold tax free under section 4221(a)(1) of the Code for use by it in further manufacture shall be treated as the manufacturer or producer of such article. If a manufacturer who purchases an article tax free for further manufacture does not use the article for further manufacture, the sale of the article by it, or its use of the article other than in further manufacture, shall, for purposes of the taxes imposed by Chapter 32 of the Code, be treated as a sale or use of the article by the manufacturer thereof. See paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section for determination of taxable sale price where an article purchased tax free for further manufacture is resold, or used other than in further manufacture.
( b ) *Computation of tax.* Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, the tax liability referred to in paragraph (a) of this section shall be based on the price for which the article was sold by the purchasing manufacturer, or, where the manufacturer uses the article for a purpose other than which it was purchased, the tax shall be based on the price at which such or similar articles are sold, in the ordinary course of trade by manufacturers, producers, or importers thereof. See section 4218(e) and § 48.4218-5.
( c ) *Election.* ( 1 ) Instead of computing the tax as described under paragraph (b) of this section, the purchasing manufacturer who has incurred liability for tax on its sale or use of an article as provided by paragraph (a) of this section may compute the tax incurred under Chapter 32 by using as the tax base either the price for which the article was sold to it by the first purchaser, if any, or the price for which such article was sold by the actual manufacturer, producer, or importer of such article. The purchasing manufacturer must have in its possession information upon which to substantiate such basis for tax. For purposes of this paragraph, the price for which the article was sold by the actual manufacturer or by the first purchaser shall be determined as provided in section 4216 and the regulations thereunder. However, such price shall not be adjusted for any discount, rebate, allowance, return, or repossession of a container or covering, or otherwise.
( 2 ) The election under this paragraph shall be in the form of a statement attached to the return reporting the tax applicable to the sale or use of the article which gave rise to such tax liability. Such election, once made, may not be revoked.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Desmond Juwon Woods, Appellant

No. 06

- 15

- 00063

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 76th District Court of Morris County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 10,920CR ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Desmond Juwon Woods, has adequately indicated his inability
to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED DECEMBER 2 9 , 2015 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
#### § 513.4 Patent and copyright royalties and film rentals.

The provisions of § 513.2 relating to the degree of liability to Irish tax in the case of dividends are equally applicable with respect to the income falling within the scope of this section.

[T.D. 8734, 62 FR 53498, Oct. 14, 1997]