alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 152 (Monday, August 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 39996]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19236]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration


Sunshine Act Meetings; Unified Carrier Registration Plan Board of 
Directors

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

Time and Date: September 3, 2009, 12 noon to 3 p.m., Eastern Daylight 
Time.

Place: This meeting will take place telephonically. Any interested 
person may call Mr. Avelino Gutierrez at (505) 827-4565 to receive the 
toll free number and pass code needed to participate in these meetings 
by telephone.

Status: Open to the public.

Matters to be Considered: The Unified Carrier Registration Plan Board 
of Directors (the Board) will continue its work in developing and 
implementing the Unified Carrier Registration Plan and Agreement and to 
that end, may consider matters properly before the Board.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Avelino Gutierrez, Chair, Unified 
Carrier Registration Board of Directors at (505) 827-4565.

    Issued on: August 4, 2009.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy and Program Development.
[FR Doc. E9-19236 Filed 8-6-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 198

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 30, 1996

Received

JOINT RESOLUTION

Appointing the day for the convening of the first session

of the One Hundred Fifth Congress and the day for

the counting in Congress of the electoral votes for President and Vice President cast in December 1996.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HJ 198 RDS

1 SECTION 1. DATE FOR CONVENING OF THE ONE HUNDRED

2 FIFTH CONGRESS.

3 The first regular session of the One Hundred Fifth

4 Congress shall begin at noon on Tuesday, January 7,

5 1997.

6 SEC. 2. DATE FOR COUNTING 1996 ELECTORAL VOTES IN

7 CONGRESS.

8 The meeting of the Senate and House of Representa9 tives to be held in January 1997 pursuant to section 15

10 of title 3, United States Code, to count the electoral votes

11 for President and Vice President cast by the electors in

12 December 1996 shall be held on January 9, 1997 (rather

13 than on the date specified in the first sentence of that

14 section).

15 Passed the House of Representatives September 28,

16 1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
On April 25 , 201 3 , several representatives of energy efficiency advocacy organizations met with staff and members of the Compressed Air and Gas Institute (CAGI) along with some compressed air experts at t he offices of the Alliance to Save Energy to explore and di scuss a consensus approach to advancing energy efficiency of compressed air systems within the context of the DOE’s po tential rulemaking on compressors. The group discussed the need to assemble the relevant data and technical content that wil l be valuable in identifying possible pathways to achieve a meaningful and appropriate compressor standard that maximizes energy savings potential without creating an undue burden on the market.
Representing the energy efficiency advocacy organizations we re Tracy Kohler of the Compressed Air Challenge, R. Bruce Lung of the Alliance to Save Energy, Derek Murrow of the Natural Resources Defense Cou ncil, and Andrew d eLaski of the Appliance Standards Awareness Project.
Representing CAGI were Chris Johnson, John Addington, and Rick Sta c yshan

. Representing compressor manufacturers were Jordan Doria , Mark Krisa, Rob Hasele y (Ingersoll Rand), Wayne Perry, Werner Rauer, Stephen Horne and Waheed Chaudury (Kaeser), Gary Gillespie (Gardner

Denver), Dave Prator (Atlas

- Copco), Pamela Maitino and Mike Muller (FS

- Elliott), and Dave Booth (Sullair).
Compressed air experts were Bill Scales and Tom Taranto

. Also represented were Chris Bolduc of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and Brian Coffey and Kurt Klinke of Navi gant.
#### § 46.4371-1 Applicability of subpart.

The provisions of this subpart apply only to premiums paid on or after January 1, 1966. See subpart H, part 47 of this chapter for provisions relating to premiums paid or charged before January 1, 1966. If any portion of the tax imposed by section 4371 was paid on the basis of the premium charged before January 1, 1966, in accordance with the provisions of § 47.4371-2 of this chapter (documentary stamp tax), then, to the extent that such portion was paid by stamp, no further tax is due under the provisions of this subpart.
#### § 1.58-5 Common trust funds.

Section 58(e) provides that each participant in a common trust fund (as defined in section 584 and the regulations thereunder) is to treat as items of tax preference his proportionate share of the items of tax preference of the fund computed as if the fund were an individual subject to the minimum tax. The participant's proportionate share of the items of tax preference of the fund is determined as if the participant had realized, or incurred, his pro rata share of items of income, gain, loss, or deduction of the fund directly from the source from which realized or incurred by the fund. The participant's pro rata share of such items is determined in a manner consistent with section 1.584-2(c). Items of tax preference apportioned to a participant pursuant to this paragraph are taken into account by the participant for the participant's taxable year in which or with which the taxable year of the trust ends.

[T.D. 7564, 43 FR 40484, Sept. 12, 1978]
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #11825 and #11826]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of Florida dated 07/29/2009. *Incident:*
                         Severe storms and flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         07/11/2009.
 DATES: *Effective Date:*
                         07/29/2009. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         09/28/2009. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         04/29/2010.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Osceola. *Contiguous Counties:* Florida: Brevard, Highlands, Indian River, Lake, Okeechobee, Orange, Polk. The Interest Rates are: PercentHomeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
4.875Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.437Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
6.000Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available Elsewhere
4.500Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 11825 B and for economic injury is 11826 0. The State which received an EIDL Declaration # is Florida. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Dated: July 29, 2009. Karen G. Mills, Administrator.


[FR Doc. E9-18932 Filed 8-6-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit No. 32.1
Form 10-QSB
Universal Express, Inc.
File No. 0-18094

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Express, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Richard Altomare, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: February 20, 2007            By: /s/ Richard Altomare
                                        ---------------------------
                                        Richard Altomare
                                        Chief Executive Officer and
                                        Chief Accounting Officer


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
#### David L. JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John E. POTTER, Postmaster General;* United States Postal Service, Defendant-Appellee,

No. 01-16207.

D.C. No. CV-00-00451-WHA/JL.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 10, 2002.**

Decided June 17, 2002.

Before O’SCANNLAIN, BERZON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 John E. Potter, Postmaster General, is substituted for his predecessor' in office pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

**

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, Jones’s request for oral argument is denied.

MEMORANDUM***

David L. Jones appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment for the United States Postal Service in his Title VII and Rehabilitation Act action alleging employment discrimination based on race and disability, and retaliation. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

*327We review de novo the district court’s grant of summary judgment. *Lopez v. Smith,*203 F.3d 1122, 1131 (9th Cir.2000) (en banc). We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s order filed March 12, 2001.

Jones raised his “civil criminal” conspiracy claim for the first time in his motion to reconsider filed ten months after his notice of appeal. We lack jurisdiction over the district court’s order denying reconsideration because Jones failed to separately appeal that order. *TAAG Linhas Aereas de Angola v. Transamerica Airlines, Inc.,*915 F.2d 1351, 1354 (9th Cir.1990).

Jones’s remaining contentions lack merit.

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
DARION HATTEN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-5043

_____________________________/

Opinion filed May 1, 2017.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Suwannee County.

Paul S. Bryan, Judge.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, 

Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., MAKAR, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Fl  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2016, byand among CREDIT SUISSE COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP., as Depositor,WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITALADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asCertificate Administrator, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trusteeand PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and AssetRepresentations Reviewer with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates, Series 2016-C7 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized termsused herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in theAgreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.            A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period fromNovember 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the “ReportingPeriod”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period hasbeen made under my supervision, and 

 

2.            To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, hasfulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day ofFebruary 2017.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President                       

Wells Fargo Bank 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
§ 46.4371-3 Rate and computation of tax. ( a ) *Rate of tax.* ( 1 ) The tax under section 4371(1) is imposed at the rate of 4 cents on each dollar, or fractional part thereof, of the premium payment.
( 2 ) The tax under section 4371 (2) and (3) is imposed at the rate of 1 cent on each dollar, or fractional part thereof, of the premium payment.
( b ) *Meaning of premium payment.* For purposes of this subpart, the term “premium payment” means the consideration paid for assuming and carrying the risk or obligation, and includes any additional assessment or charge paid under the contract, whether payable in one sum or installments.
This document is located at the FAA Hearing Docket,

600 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591.

This document is not publicly available;

See Protective Order issued by ALJ Goodwin

Dated December 1, 2014.
```

[113th Congress Public Law 85]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 128 STAT. 1014]]

Public Law 113-85
113th Congress

                            Joint Resolution

 
Providing for the appointment of Risa Lavizzo-Mourey as a citizen regent 
of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. <<NOTE: Feb. 21, 
                        2014 -  [S.J. Res. 29]>> 

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 
43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, 
in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by reason of the 
expiration of the term of Patricia Q. Stonesifer of Washington, DC, on 
December 21, 2013, is filled by the appointment of Risa Lavizzo-Mourey 
of Pennsylvania. The appointment is for a term of 6 years, beginning on 
the later of December 22, 2013, or the date of enactment of this joint 
resolution.

    Approved February 21, 2014.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S.J. Res. 29:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014):
            Jan. 29, considered and passed Senate.
            Feb. 11, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
§ 143.5 Taxes on self-dealing; indirect transactions by a private foundation. ( a ) *In general.* Section 4941(d)(1)(D) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 as added by section 101(b) of the Tax Reform Act of 1969 (83 Stat. 500) provides that the term “self-dealing” includes any direct or indirect payment of compensation (or payment or reimbursement of expenses) by a private foundation to a disqualified person. Section 4941(d)(1)(E) provides that the term “self-dealing” includes any direct or indirect transfer to, or use by, or for the benefit of, a disqualified person of the income or assets of a private foundation. Section 4941(d)(1)(F) provides that the term “self-dealing” includes any direct or indirect agreement by a private foundation to make any payment of money or other property to a government official other than an agreement to employ such individual for any period after the termination of his government service if such individual is terminating his government service within a 90-day period.
( b ) *Indirect transactions by a private foundation.* A transaction engaged in directly with a Government official by an organization described in section 509(a) (1), (2), or (3) which is the recipient of a grant from a private foundation shall not constitute an indirect act of self-dealing between such private foundation and Government official if the private foundation does not earmark the use of the grant for any named Government official and does not control or retain any veto power over the selection of the Government official by the grantee organization. For purposes of the preceding sentence, a grant by a private foundation shall not constitute an indirect act of self-dealing even though such foundation had reason to believe that certain Government officials would derive benefits from such grant so long as the grantee, in fact, exercises control over the selecting process and actually makes the selection completely independent of the private foundation.
( c ) *Example.* The provisions of subsection (b) of this section may be illustrated by the following example.
Example. A private foundation made a grant to an organization described in section 509(a) (1), (2), or (3) to conduct a judicial seminar. The grantee conducting the seminar made payments to certain Government officials. By the nature of the seminar the grantor foundation had reason to believe that Government officials would be compensated for participation in such seminar. The grantee, however, had complete independent control over the selection of such participants. Since the grantee has not acted as a conduit for the private foundation and has, in fact, exercised independent control over the use of the grant, such grant by the private foundation shall not constitute an act of self-dealing with respect to the Government officials.
[T.D. 7036, 35 FR 6322, Apr. 18, 1970]
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

February 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129814 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

LAFARGE MIDWEST, INC., 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 129814 

 COA: 253591 

Muskegon CC: 03-042472-CK

FRANKENMUTH MUTUAL INSURANCE 

COMPANY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 11, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0221 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

February 27, 2006 

Clerk
§ 51.6302-1 Method of paying the branded prescription drug fee. ( a ) *Fee to be paid by electronic funds transfer.* Under the authority of section 6302(a), the fee imposed on branded prescription drug sales by section 9008 and § 51.5 must be paid by electronic funds transfer as defined in § 31.6302-1(h)(4)(i) of this title, as if the fee were a depository tax. For the time for paying the fee, see § 51.8.
( b ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section applies on and after July 28, 2014.
[T.D. 9684, 79 FR 43645, July 28, 2014]
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

September 12, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00594

- CV

IN THE MATTER OF A.S.,

From the 386th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018JUV00095 The Honorable Arcelia Trevino, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The clerk’s record in this appeal shows t hat the juvenile court waived its exclusive original jurisdiction and transfer red Appellant ’s case to a criminal district court . The trial court signed the order on June 15, 2019.
The waiver of jurisdiction and discretionary transfer to criminal court order is an appealable order. T EX

. F AM

. C ODE A NN

. § 56.01(c)(1)(A) ; see In re T. S. , 548 S.W.3d 711, 720 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2018, no pet.) . The appeal is accelerated and “ has precedence
over all other cases .” T EX

. F AM

. C ODE A NN

. § 56.01 (h).
Appellant’s notice of appeal was due on July 5, 2019. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.1(b). A
motion for extension of time to file a no tice of appeal was due not later than July 22, 20109. See
id. R. 26.3.
Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed on September 3, 2019

. Appellant’s notice of appeal appears to be untimely. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(a); Verburgt v. Dorner , 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (“[O] nce the period for granting a motion for extension of time under Rule [26.3] has passed, a party can no longer invoke the appellate court ’ s jurisdiction .”).

W e ORDER Appellant to SHOW CAUSE in writing within TEN days of the date o f this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. If Appellant fails to respond within the time provided, this appeal will be dismissed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c).
All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending further order of this court.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 12th day of September, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court