alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.6316-2 Definitions. For purposes of §§ 301.6316-1 to 301.6316-9, inclusive: ( a ) The term *tax,* as used in §§ 301.6316-1, 301.6316-3, 301.6316-4, 301.6316-5, and 301.6316-6 means the income tax imposed for the taxable year by chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, and as used in § 301.6316-7 means the Federal Insurance Contributions Act taxes imposed by chapter 21 of the Code (or by the corresponding provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939). The term “tax”, as used in §§ 301.6316-3 and 301.6316-9 shall relate to either of such taxes, whichever is appropriate.
( b ) The term *nonconvertible foreign currency* means currency of the government of a foreign country which, owing to ( 1 ) monetary, exchange, or other restrictions imposed by the foreign country,
( 2 ) an agreement entered into with the United States of America, or
( 3 ) the terms and conditions of the U.S. Government grant, is not convertible into U.S. dollars or into other money which is convertible into U.S. dollars. The term shall not, however, include currency which, notwithstanding such restrictions, agreement, terms, or conditions, is in fact converted into U.S. dollars or into property which is readily disposable for U.S. dollars.
( c ) If the taxpayer computes taxable income under the accrual method, then the term *received* shall be construed to mean “accrued.”
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Angelique Reid, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[804 NYS2d 479]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Ap*982peal Board, filed April 20, 2005, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was terminated from her position managing revenue recovery projects for Health Insurance Plan of New York after the employer learned that she misrepresented her income to a bank in connection with a home mortgage application. Claimant’s application for unemployment insurance benefits was thereafter denied on the ground that her misrepresentation constituted disqualifying misconduct. Following hearings, the Administrative Law Judge sustained the initial determination, and the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board affirmed. Claimant now appeals.

We affirm. Conduct may be disqualifying when it violates generally accepted standards of behavior that an employer has the right to expect from its employees or bears materially upon an employee’s honesty or integrity to serve in a particular capacity *(see Matter of Sinker [Sweeney],*89 NY2d 485, 487-488 [1997]; *Matter of Punter [Ross],*43 NY2d 743, 744 [1977]). Here, although claimant denied manufacturing salary verification letters on the employer’s letterhead, she admitted to misrepresenting her employment income to the bank when she initially pursued the mortgage application. Inasmuch as this apparent dishonesty impacted upon claimant’s fitness to continue in her employment, we find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s determination *(see Matter of Washington [Commissioner of Labor],*304 AD2d 896, 896 [2003]; *Matter of McAllister [Commissioner of Labor],*301 AD2d 1012, 1012 [2003]).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Spain, Carpinello and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
HPMSVtypeID yearID HPMSBaseYearVMT baseYearOffNetVMT

10 2015 37992550 0

20 2015 5604481195 0

30 2015 3443094275 0

40 2015 18580690 0

50 2015 214020305 0

60 2015 420171940 0
J-A11017-15

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

D.H. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

Appellee

v.

B.M.

Appellant No. 2015 EDA 2014

Appeal from the Order of July 3, 2014

In the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County

Civil Division Docket No: 11-07785 

BEFORE: FORD ELLIOT, P.J.E., OLSON and WECHT, JJ.

JUDGMENT ORDER PER CURIAM: FILED MAY 01, 2015

Appellant, B.M.,

1

appeals pro se from the July 3, 2014 order finding 

her in contempt of court. We dismiss the appeal.

On July 3, 2014, the trial court found Appellant to be in contempt of 

court for failing to attend court-ordered reunification counseling. The trial 

court ordered Appellant to pay $560.00 in costs associated with her missed 

counseling sessions. She appealed that contempt finding to this Court. 

Instead of filing a brief on appeal, Appellant filed a 12-page document that 

fails to address the merits of this appeal and, instead, discusses a myriad of 

unrelated issues. This document fails to comply with several Pennsylvania 

 

1 As this case involves child custody issues, we are identifying the parties by 

their initials so as to protect the identity of the minor child.
J-A11017-15

- 2 -

Rules of Appellate Procedure. See, e.g., Pa.R.A.P. 2111, 2114, 2116, 2117, 

2118, and 2119. 

“[W]e decline to become the appellant’s counsel. When . . . briefs are 

wholly inadequate to present specific issues for review, a Court will not 

consider the merits thereof.” Branch Banking & Trust v. Gesiorski, 904 

A.2d 939, 942–943 (Pa. Super. 2006) (internal alteration and citation 

omitted). Although we could discuss the deficiencies with respect to each 

rule of court listed above, we focus on Pennsylvania Rule 2116, which 

provides that “No question will be considered unless it is stated in the 

statement of questions involved or is fairly suggested thereby.” Pa.R.A.P. 

2116(a). Appellant’s document lacks a statement of questions involved. 

The lack of a statement of questions involved, along with the other 

deficiencies, renders Appellant’s document “wholly inadequate to present 

specific issues for review.” Gesiorski, 904 A.2d at 942. Therefore, 
J-A11017-15

- 3 -

pursuant to Pennsylvania Rule of Appellate Procedure 2101,2 we dismiss the 

appeal.3

Appeal dismissed.

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq.

Prothonotary

Date: 5/1/2015

 

2

 Pennsylvania Rule of Appellate Procedure 2101 provides that:

Briefs . . . shall conform in all material respects with the 

requirements of these rules . . . . [I]f the defects are in the brief 

or reproduced record of the appellant and are substantial, the 

appeal or other matter may be quashed or dismissed.

Pa.R.A.P. 2101. 

3 Even if we were to consider the merits of this appeal, we would affirm as 

Appellant has waived all issues on appeal. See Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b). Finally, 

even if we found that she had preserved any issues for appeal, we conclude 

her challenge to the trial court’s contempt order is without merit.
§ 31.3121(a)(12)-1 Tips. The term “wages” does not include remuneration received by an employee after December 1965 in the form of tips if— ( a ) The tips are paid in any medium other than cash, or
( b ) The cash tips received by an employee in any calendar month in the course of his employment by an employer are less than $20.
If the cash tips received by an employee in a calendar month after December 1965 in the course of his employment by an employer amount to $20 or more, none of the cash tips received by the employee in such calendar month are excluded from the term “wages” under this section. The cash tips to which this section applies include checks and other monetary media of exchange. Tips received by an employee in any medium other than cash, such as passes, tickets, or other goods or commodities do not constitute wages. If an employee in any calendar month performs services for two or more employers and receives tips in the course of his employment by each employer, the $20 test is to be applied separately with respect to the cash tips received by the employee in respect of his services for each employer and not to the total cash tips received by the employee during the month. As to the time tips are deemed paid, see § 31.3121(q)-1. For provisions relating to the treatment of tips received by an employee prior to 1966, see paragraph (j)(3) of § 31.3121 (a)-1. [T.D. 7001, 34 FR 999, Jan. 23, 1969]
IA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 59

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution authorizing the President to

disapprove or reduce an item of appropriations.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 19, 1995

Mr. POSHARD introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution authorizing

the President to disapprove or reduce an item of appropriations.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution if ratified

7 by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States

8 within seven years after its submission to the States for

9 ratification:
2

HJ 59 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE—

2 ‘‘The President may reduce or disapprove any item

3 of appropriation in any Act or joint resolution, except any

4 item of appropriation for the legislative branch of the Gov5 ernment. If any Act or joint resolution is approved by the

6 President, any item of appropriation contained therein

7 which is not reduced or disapproved shall become law. The

8 President shall return with his objections any item of ap9 propriation reduced or disapproved to the House in which

10 the Act or joint resolution containing such item originated.

11 The Congress may, in the manner prescribed under sec12 tion 7 of article I for Acts disapproved by the President,

13 reconsider any item disapproved or reduced under this ar14 ticle, except that only a majority vote of each House shall

15 be required to approve an item which has been dis16 approved or to restore an item which has been reduced

17 by the President to the original amount contained in the

18 Act or joint resolution.’’.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

         The undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
First Keystone Financial, Inc. (the "Registrant") hereby certify that the
Registrant's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

                                    /s/ Thomas M. Kelly
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Name: Thomas M. Kelly
                                    Title: President and Chief Financial Officer

Date: August 14, 2003
Order entered December 12 , 2016

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 15

- 01360

- CR

JUSTIN ROBERT BOYCE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 15t h Judicial District Court

Grayson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 063963



### O RDER

We GRANT appellant’s December 7 , 2016 second motion to extend time to file his reply

brief and ORDER the reply brie f filed no later than December 16 , 2016.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: The regulations contained in this part have been recodified in 46 CFR part 287.

§ 2.1-7 Circumstances permitting reimbursement from a construction reserve fund. ( a ) *Payments prior to establishment of fund.* If, prior to the establishment of a construction reserve fund under the regulations in this part, a taxpayer has made necessary payments under a contract which satisfies the provisions of the regulations in this part and section 511 of the Act for the construction or acquisition of a new vessel, such taxpayer may, if subsequently authorized to establish a construction reserve fund under the regulations in this part, draw against such fund as reimbursement for the amount, if any, of other funds which, with the approval or ratification of the Administration, the taxpayer used for making such necessary payments prior to the establishment of the fund.
( b ) *Payments subsequent to establishment of fund.* If, subsequent to the establishment of a construction reserve fund under the regulations in this part, the taxpayer has made necessary payments under a contract which satisfies the provisions of the regulations in this part and section 511 of the Act for the construction or acquisition of a new vessel, such taxpayer may draw against such fund as reimbursement for the amount, if any, of other funds which, with the approval or ratification of the Administration, the taxpayer had used for the purpose of making such necessary payments.
§ 48.4161(b)-1 Imposition and rates of tax; bows and arrows. ( a ) *Imposition of tax.* Section 4161(b) imposes a tax on the sale of the following articles by the manufacturer, producer, or importer thereof: ( 1 ) Any bow that has a draw weight of 10 pounds or more;
( 2 ) Any arrow that measures 18 inches overall or more in length;
( 3 ) Any part or accessory (other than a fishing reel) suitable for inclusion in or attachment to a bow or arrow described in subparagraph (1) or (2) of this paragraph; and
( 4 ) Any quiver suitable for use with arrows described in subparagraph (2) of this paragraph.
( b ) *Rate of tax.* The tax is imposed on the sale of articles enumerated in section 4161(b) and paragraph (a) of this section at the rate of 11 percent of the price for which such articles are sold. For the definition of the term “price”, see section 4216 and the regulations thereunder.
( c ) *Liability for tax.* (1) The tax imposed by section 4161(b) is payable by the manufacturer, producer, or importer making the sale. For determining who is the manufacturer, producer, or importer, see § 48.0-2(a)(4).
[T.D. 7328, 39 FR 36586, Oct. 11, 1974, as amended by T.D. 8043, 50 FR 32014, Aug. 8, 1985]
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 .
  1.
    
    the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the
periods presented in the Form 10-Q.
 Date:  November 7, 2007
    /s/ James R. RidingsJAMES R. RIDINGSChairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
IIA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1026

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 18, 1995

Received

AN ACT

To designate the United States Post Office building located

at 201 East Pikes Peak Avenue in Colorado Springs,

Colorado, as the ‘‘Winfield Scott Stratton Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 1026 RDS

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The United States Post Office building located at 201

3 East Pikes Peak Avenue, Colorado Springs, Colorado,

4 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Winfield Scott

5 Stratton Post Office’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the building

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

10 to the ‘‘Winfield Scott Stratton Post Office’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 17,

1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 12, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 34945]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-14260]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES

[Public Notice 2012-0145]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the United States.

ACTION: Submission for OMB Review and Comments Request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Form Title: EIB 92-41 Application for Financial Institution Short-
Term, Single-Buyer Insurance.

SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank), as a 
part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent 
burden, invites the general public and other Federal Agencies to 
comment on the proposed information collection, as required by the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
    The ``Application for Financial Institution Short Term Single Buyer 
Insurance'' form will be used by entities involved in the export of 
U.S. goods and services, to provide Ex-Im Bank with the information 
necessary to obtain legislatively required assurance of repayment and 
fulfills other statutory requirements.
    The application can be reviewed at: www.exim.gov/pub/pending/eib92-41.pdf Application for Financial Institution Short Term Single Buyer 
Insurance.

DATES: Comments should be received on or before (insert 60 days after 
publication) to be assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted electronically on 
WWW.REGULATIONS.GOV or by mail to Arnold Chow, Export-Import Bank of 
the United States, 811 Vermont Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20571.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Titles and Form Number: EIB 92-41 
Application for Financial Institution Short-Term, Single-Buyer 
Insurance.
    OMB Number: 3048-0019.
    Type of Review: Regular.
    Need and Use: The information requested enables the applicant to 
provide Ex-Im Bank with the information necessary to obtain 
legislatively required assurance of repayment and fulfills other 
statutory requirements.
    Annual Number of Respondents: 300.
    Estimated Time per Respondent: 1.5 hours.
    Government Annual Burden Hours: 450.
    Frequency of Reporting or Use: Annually.
    Government Review Time: 6 hours.
    Total Hours: 1,800.
    Cost to the Government: $69,696.

Sharon A. Whitt,
Agency Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-14260 Filed 6-11-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
#### In the Matter of Ruth Q. Susan C., Respondent; Judith B., Appellant, et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Hyman Q. Susan C., Respondent; Judith B., Appellant, et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 2.) Appellant.

[808 NYS2d 110]

In two related proceedings pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 81 to appoint legal guardians for the persons and property of Ruth Q. and Hyman Q., respectively, alleged incapacitated persons, Judith B. appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of two orders of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Taylor, J.), dated January 23, 2004, and February 11, 2004, respectively, as, in effect, denied her application for an award of an attorney’s fee.

Ordered that on the Court’s own motion, the notices of appeal are treated as applications for leave to appeal, and leave to appeal is granted *(see*CPLR 5701 [c]); and it is further,

Ordered that the orders are affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the petitioner-respondent, payable by the appellant.

The denial, in effect, of the appellant’s application for an award of an attorney’s fee was proper. Mental Hygiene Law article 81 does not authorize an award of an attorney’s fee for services rendered in opposing a petition for the appointment of a guardian for the person and property of alleged incapacitated persons *(cf.*Mental Hygiene Law § 81,16 [f]). Crane, J.P., Santucci, Mastro and Dillon, JJ., concur.
§ 56.6694-4 Extension of period of collection when tax return preparer pays 15 percent of a penalty for understatement of taxpayer's liability and certain other procedural matters. ( a ) *In general.* For rules relating to the extension of period of collection when a tax return preparer who prepared a return or claim for refund for tax under chapter 41 of subtitle D of the Internal Revenue Code pays 15 percent of a penalty for understatement of taxpayer's liability and procedural matters relating to the investigation, assessment and collection of the penalties under section 6694(a) and (b), the rules under § 1.6694-4 of this chapter will apply.
( b ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section is applicable to returns and claims for refund filed, and advice provided, after December 31, 2008.
[T.D. 9436, 73 FR 78461, Dec. 22, 2008]
★

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1014

AN ACT

To authorize extension of time limitation for a FERC-issued

hydroelectric license.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding the time limitation of section 13 of

4 the Federal Power Act, the Federal Energy Regulatory

5 Commission, upon the request of the licensee for FERC

6 Project No. 3701, is authorized, in accordance with the

7 good faith, due diligence, and public interest requirements
2

•HR 1014 EH1S

1 of section 13 and the Commission’s procedures under such

2 section, to extend the time required for the licensee to

3 commence the construction of such project for up to a

4 maximum of 3 consecutive 2-year periods. This section

5 shall take effect for the project upon the expiration of the

6 extension (issued by the Commission under section 13) of

7 the period required for commencement of construction of

8 such project. If the license for FERC Project 3701 should

9 expire prior to the date of enactment of this Act, the Com10 mission is authorized and directed to reinstate effective

11 June 1, 1995, the license previously issued for such

12 project.

Passed the House of Representatives November 13,

1995.

Attest:

Clerk.
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1014

AN ACT

To authorize extension of time limitation for a

FERC-issued hydroelectric license.
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.7517-1 Furnishing on request of statement explaining estate or gift valuation. ( a ) *In general.* Section 7517 requires the Service to furnish to a taxpayer, at the request of that taxpayer, a statement explaining the estate, gift or generation-skipping transfer valuation of any item contained on a return filed by the taxpayer as to which a determination or proposed determination of value has been made. The request must be filed no later than the latest time to file a claim for refund of the tax which is dependent on the value with respect to which the determination has been made. The request should be filed with the district director's office that has jurisdiction over the return of the taxpayer.
( b ) *Effective date* — ( 1 ) *Estates of decedents.* Section 7517 applies to estates of decedents dying after December 31, 1976.
( 2 ) *Gifts.* Section 7517 applies to gifts made after December 31, 1976.
( 3 ) *Generation-skipping transfer.* Section 7517 applies to any generation-skipping transfer subject to chapter 13.
[T.D. 7757, 46 FR 6930, Jan. 22, 1981]