alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
www.gpo.gov

### §286w. Denial of membership or other status in Fund for Palestine Liberation Organization; United States participation in Fund if membership or other status granted; report by President to Congress

It is the policy of the United States that the Palestine Liberation Organization should not be given membership in the Fund or be given observer status or any other official status at any meeting sponsored by or associated with the Fund. The United States Executive Director of the Fund shall promptly notify the Fund of such policy.

In the event that the Fund provides either membership, observer status, or any other official status to the Palestine Liberation Organization, such action would result in a serious diminution of United States support. Upon review of such action, the President would be required to report his recommendations to the Congress with regard to any further United States participation in the Fund.

(July 31, 1945, ch. 339, §37, as added Pub. L. 96–389, §7, Oct. 7, 1980, 94 Stat. 1554.)

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 7, 1980, see section 12 of Pub. L. 96–389, set out as a note under section 286s of this title.
§ 403.5 Meaning of terms. As used in this part, and unless the context otherwise requires, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth in this section. In this part words in the plural form shall include the singular, and vice versa, and words importing the masculine gender shall include the feminine. The terms “includes” and “including” do not exclude things not enumerated which are in the same general class. ( a ) *Appraised value.* The value placed upon seized property by the appraisers pursuant to § 403.26(a)(2) for the purpose of determining whether the property may be forfeited administratively.
( b ) *Equity.* For purposes of subpart D of this part, the petitioner's interest in the subject personal property at the time of final administrative action on the petition, but not including: ( 1 ) Any unearned finance charges accruing from the later of the date of seizure or the date of default;
( 2 ) any amount rebatable on account of paid insurance premiums;
( 3 ) attorney's fees for collection;
( 4 ) any amount identified as dealer's reserve; or
( 5 ) any amount in the nature of liquidated damages that may have been agreed upon by the buyer and the petitioner.
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Richard Rubin, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of American BiogeneticSciences, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the  issuer as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4. The  issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as 4efined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the  issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the  issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or causedsuch internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the  issuer's disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the  issuer's internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the  issuer's most recentfiscal quarter (the  issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the  issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The  issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the  issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the  issuer's board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the  issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether r not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the  issuer's internal control overfinancial reporting.

Date: May 13, 2010

/s/ Richard RubinCEO, CFO and Chairman
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Fl  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to thatcertain Trust and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 26, 2016, by andamong J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., as Depositor,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Servicer and Special Servicer, WellsFargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator and WilmingtonTrust, National Association, as Trustee with respect to Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates Series 2016-NINE (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 13.7 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Marthinsen, Managing Director of Special Servicing dohereby certify that:

 

1.            A review of the activities of the Special Servicer during the period fromSeptember 26, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the “ReportingPeriod”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period hasbeen made under my supervision, and 

 

2.            To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

                                                                                               

 

/s/ Daniel Marthinsen

Daniel Marthinsen, ManagingDirector                  

Wells Fargo Bank 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

Certification of Periodic Report

 

I, John F. Clifford, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of ProCyteCorporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

1.               theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Company for the quarterly period endedMarch 31, 2003 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (12 U.S.C. 78m or78o(d)); and

 

2.               theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  May 12, 2003 | By:    |   /s/ John F. Clifford                                                 |
|--------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |   |                                                                             |
|                     |   |   John F. Clifford, Chairman and CEO,    ProCyte Corporation |

 

**A signed original ofthis written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ProCyteCorporation and will be retained by ProCyte Corporation and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.**

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             308
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,655
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     28,844
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                68,330
<PP&E>                                          21,516
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 133,588
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,773
<BONDS>                                        125,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0   
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,781  
<OTHER-SE>                                   (143,896)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   133,588
<SALES>                                        125,390
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               125,390
<CGS>                                           71,886
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   71,886
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                43,562
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,328
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,799)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,634)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,165)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (10,553)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (22,718)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Directory of rural farmer,rancher, and fishery cooperatives**
 
2009 | 2010
 
SuDoc Number:A 109.9/2:
Item Number:0064-C-02 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000803658
 
January 3, 2018
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pearl B. MATTHEWS, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pearl B. Matthews, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 01-2395, 02-1411.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 30, 2002.

Decided June 6, 2002.

Pearl B. Matthews, Appellant Pro Se. G. Norman Acker, III, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Pearl B. Matthews appeals the district court’s orders denying her motions filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b), in which she sought to vacate the court’s prior orders in this foreclosure action by the government. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *United States v. Matthews,*No. CA-95-137-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 5, 2001; Apr. 15, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### Linda S. Gibson et al., Respondents, v Encompass Insurance Company, Appellant.

[804 NYS2d 226]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Frank A. Sedita, Jr., J.), entered April 15, 2005. The order denied defendant’s motion seeking to strike plaintiffs’ notice to produce and seeking a protective order.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed with costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action to recover supplementary underinsured motorist (SUM) coverage pursuant to an automobile liability insurance policy issued by defendant. Supreme Court properly denied that part of defendant’s motion seeking to strike plaintiffs’ notice to produce defendant’s file regarding plaintiffs’ SUM claim. The court did not abuse its broad discretion in determining “that the sought-after disclosure was ‘material and necessary’ for the prosecution of plaintiff[s’] action” *(Walsh v Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.,*289 AD2d 842, 843 [2001], quoting CPLR 3101 [a]). The disclosure request was not “palpably improper” *(Zambelis v Nicholas,*92 AD2d 936 [1983]; *see Salwen Paper Co., Profit Sharing Retirement Trust v Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith,*110 AD2d 895, 896 [1985]), and defendant’s contentions that the file contains material exempt from disclosure are raised for the first time on appeal and are *1048thus not preserved for our review *(see Central Buffalo Project Corp. v Rainbow Salads,*140 AD2d 943, 944-945 [1988]). In any event, defendant failed to meet its burden of establishing that the file contains material that is privileged or otherwise exempt from discovery *(see Bombard v Arnica Mut. Ins. Co.,*11 AD3d 647, 648 [2004]; *McCarthy v Klein,*238 AD2d 552, 553-554 [1997]).

The court also properly denied that part of defendant’s motion seeking a protective order to prevent the deposition of defendant’s underinsurance claim representative. We perceive no basis to disturb the determination that defendant’s representative possesses “material and necessary” information regarding the action (CPLR 3101 [a]; *see Walsh,*289 AD2d at 843). Present—Green, J.P., Gorski, Smith, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1002

To amend the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 to exempt marinas from the financial

responsibility requirements applicable to off shore facilities under that Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 21, 1995

Mr. GEJDENSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To amend the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 to exempt marinas

from the financial responsibility requirements applicable

to off shore facilities under that Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Marina Relief Act of

5 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

7 The Congress finds the following:

8 (1) The Oil Pollution Act of 1990 was enacted

9 in part in response to the EXXON VALDEZ oil

10 spill, which discharged approximately 11,000,000
2

•HR 1002 IH

1 gallons of crude oil into Prince William Sound,

2 Alaska.

3 (2) That Act was enacted to prevent similar

4 disasters in the future and to ensure that companies

5 transporting and drilling for oil had sufficient finan6 cial resources, insurance, or other means to pay for

7 comprehensive cleanup and environmental restora8 tion in response to discharges of oil into navigable

9 waters.

10 (3) That Act required offshore facilities which

11 could pollute navigable waters of the United States

12 to provide proof of financial responsibility of at least

13 $150,000,000.

14 (4) Marinas sell gasoline and diesel fuel only,

15 and reported that in fiscal year 1994 only 144 gal16 lons of gasoline and diesel fuel oil were spilled na17 tionwide.

18 (5) Marinas do not have the capital to self-in19 sure or receive letters of credit for $150,000,000

20 and insurance policies are unavailable to them for

21 that amount.

22 (6) Requiring marinas to demonstrate

23 $150,000,000 in financial responsibility could drive

24 many of them out of business with subsequent nega-
3

•HR 1002 IH

1 tive impacts on their owners and employees, boaters,

2 and coastal residents.

3 SEC. 3. MARINAS EXEMPTED FROM FINANCIAL RESPON4 SIBILITY REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO

5 OFFSHORE FACILITIES.

6 (a) EXEMPTION FROM FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

7 REQUIREMENT.—Section 1016(c)(1) of the Oil Pollution

8 Act of 1980 (33 U.S.C. 2716(c)(1))—

9 (1) by inserting ‘‘(A)’’ before ‘‘Except as pro10 vided in paragraph (2),’’; and

11 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub12 paragraph:

13 ‘‘(B) Subparagraph (A) shall not apply to a marina.’’.

14 (b) MARINA DEFINED.—Section 1001 of the Oil Pol15 lution Act of 1990 (33 U.S.C. 2701) is amended by strik16 ing ‘‘and’’ after the semicolon at the end of paragraph

17 (36), by striking the period at the end of paragraph (37)

18 and inserting ‘‘; and’’, and by adding at the end the follow19 ing:

20 ‘‘(38) ‘marina’ means a facility used primarily

21 for providing mooring space, dock space, fuel, stor22 age on land, or other services primarily for rec23 reational vessels.’’.

Æ
www.gpo.gov

### §258a. Enforcement of awards of foreign consuls

The district courts and the United States magistrate judges shall have power to carry into effect, according to the true intent and meaning thereof, the award or arbitration or decree of any consul, vice consul or commercial agent of any foreign nation, made or rendered by virtue of authority conferred on him as such consul, vice consul, or commercial agent, to sit as judge or arbitrator in such differences as may arise between the captains and crews of the vessels belonging to the nation whose interests are committed to his charge, application for the exercise of such power being first made to such court or magistrate judge, by petition of such consul, vice consul, or commercial agent. And said courts and magistrate judges may issue all proper remedial process, mesne and final, to carry into full effect such award, arbitration, or decree, and to enforce obedience thereto by imprisonment in the jail or other place of confinement in the district in which the United States may lawfully imprison any person arrested under the authority of the United States, until such award, arbitration or decree is complied with, or the parties are otherwise discharged therefrom, by the consent in writing of such consul, vice consul, or commercial agent, or his successor in office, or by the authority of the foreign government appointing such consul, vice consul, or commercial agent. The expenses of the said imprisonment and maintenance of the prisoners, and the cost of the proceedings, shall be borne by such foreign government, or by its consul, vice consul, or commercial agent requiring such imprisonment. The marshals of the United States shall serve all such process, and do all other acts necessary and proper to carry into effect the premises, under the authority of the said courts and magistrate judges.

(Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §271, 36 Stat. 1163; Pub. L. 90–578, title IV, §402(b)(2), Oct. 17, 1968, 82 Stat. 1118; Pub. L. 101–650, title III, §321, Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5117.)

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 393 of Title 28 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, by act June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §1, 62 Stat. 869.

#### Change of Name

“United States magistrate judges”, “magistrate judge”, and “magistrate judges” substituted in text for “United States magistrates”, “magistrate”, and “magistrates”, respectively, pursuant to section 321 of Pub. L. 101–650, set out as a note under section 631 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure. Previously, “magistrate” substituted for “commissioner” pursuant to Pub. L. 90–578. See chapter 43 (§631 et seq.) of Title 28.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
       
<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                    MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                                              3583105
<SECURITIES>                                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                        315240
<ALLOWANCES>                                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                          0
<PP&E>                                                             29439200
<DEPRECIATION>                                                     23656624
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                      9690510
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                     0
<BONDS>                                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                                               0
<COMMON>                                                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                                          9574037
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                        9690510
<SALES>                                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                     478764
<CGS>                                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                     275261
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                      203503
<INCOME-TAX>                                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                  203503
<DISCONTINUED>                                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                                         203503
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                          2.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                             0
        

</TABLE>
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Mildred Fishman

Argued March 5

decided March 5, 1968

*Arlen D. Nichowits,*assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (state).

*John D. Sailing,*for the appellant (defendant).

The motion by the state to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County is granted unless the defendant files her brief on or before April 30, 1968.