alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Ira S., Respondent, v Lauren S., Appellant. In the Matter of the Custody of Max S. and Another, Infants. Lauren S., Appellant; New York City Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent.

[805 NYS2d 17]

Orders, Family Court, Bronx County (Carol Ann Stokinger, J.), entered on or about July 9, 2002, October 30, 2002, December 15, 2003 and December 10, 2004, which, inter alia, discontinued family therapy until respondent mother meaningfully engaged in individual therapy, awarded custody of the par*289ties’ son to petitioner father, and denied the mother’s request for a hearing into the father’s relocation out of state with the son, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We decline to review Bronx County Family Court’s order, entered on or about March 24, 1999 (John M. Hunt, J.), which, in a neglect proceeding, after a hearing pursuant to Family Court Act § 1028, inter alia, denied the mother’s application for return of the son to her home. No appeal was taken directly from this intermediate order, although allowed (Family Ct Act § 1112 [a]), and the issues addressed at the section 1028 hearing had no effect on the final result in the article 10 proceeding (CPLR 5501 [a] [1]), which was dismissed as unnecessary on the basis of the disposition in the instant custody proceeding (Family Ct Act § 1051 [c]). The orders of July 9 and October 30, 2002 were not vague or otherwise improper, given a record showing that the mother was resistant to any sort of therapy, and that supervised visits were in the son’s best interests until such time as the mother engaged in individual therapy and otherwise meaningfully addressed the issues raised in the neglect petition, namely, her methods of discipline. The record contains no support for the mother’s contention that she was denied due process at the custody hearing resulting in the order of December 15, 2003, and indeed shows that, to the contrary, she was given great leeway in consideration of her pro se status.

In the order of December 10, 2004, Family Court properly refused to conduct a hearing into the father’s relocation out of state with the son, where the court had already determined that the best interests of the then 17-year-old son was for him to remain in the father’s custody, and the mother had no visitation rights but only the right to telephone or e-mail the son, which, it appears, she had not done. Therefore, the relocation could have had no adverse effect on visitation. No basis exists to disturb Family Court’s finding that it is the respective best interests of the children that the mother have custody of the parties’ daughter and the father have custody of the son *(see Eschbach v Eschbach,*56 NY2d 167, 172-173 [1982]). In addition, since there is no indication that the children’s interests were conflicting, each having expressed a desire to live with a different parent, there was no need for the appointment of separate law guardians. We have considered the mother’s other contentions and find them to be unavailing. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Friedman, Sullivan, Malone, JJ.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.7

                          WESTERN GAS RESOURCES, INC.

                  Resolutions Amending the Company's By-Laws
                  ------------------------------------------


        RESOLVED, that Section 11 of Article III of the Company's By-Laws is 
hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced, in lieu thereof, with the 
following:

        "Section 11. Unless otherwise restricted by the certificate of
        incorporation or these bylaws, any action required or permitted to be
        taken at any meeting of the Board of Directors or of any committee
        thereof may be taken without a meeting if one hundred percent of the
        members of the Board or one hundred percent of the members of the
        committee, as the case may be, consent thereto in writing and such
        writing is filed with the minutes of the proceedings of the Board or
        committee, as the case may be."

        RESOLVED, that Section 1 of ARTICLE VII of the Company's By-Laws is 
hereby amended by deleting all references to "any person" and replacing such 
phrase with "any officer or director" and by deleting all references to "a 
director, officer, employee or agent" and replacing such phrase with " a 
director or officer."







ADOPTED ON MARCH 21, 1997
## IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS District of St. Croix

PHILSBERT CODRINGTON, Petitioner, v. GME DOSPIVA LLC AND COMMISSIONER OF DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondents. Case Number: SX-2010-CV-00102 Action: Writ of Review



## NOTICE of ENTRY

of JUDGMENT/ORDER To: Philsbert Codrington, pro se Michael R. Francisco, Esq., AAG H.A. Curt Otto, Esq.

Please take notice that on December 21, 2023 a(n) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

dated December 21, 2023 was/were entered by the Clerk in the above-titled matter. Dated: December 21, 2023 Tamara Charles Clerk of the Court By:

Cheryl Parris

Court Clerk III
Exhibit 13.1



Certification
by the Principal Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Jiancong Huang,
Chief Executive Officer of ZK International Group Co., Ltd. (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | a. | the Company’s annual report on Form 20-F/A for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | b. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Dated July 8, 2019





|By: | /s/ Jiancong Huang             | 
|--- | ------------------------------ | 
|    | Name: Jiancong Huang           | 
|    | Title: Chief Executive Officer |
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.6101-1 Period covered by returns or other documents.

For provisions concerning the period covered by returns or other documents, see the regulations relating to the particular tax.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>        5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ACG
HOLDINGS, INC.'S UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                               0000856710
<NAME>                                              ACG HOLDINGS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                        1,000
<CURRENCY>                                          U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>            3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                      APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                        JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1
<CASH>                                              0
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       61,386
<ALLOWANCES>                                        3,022
<INVENTORY>                                         11,799
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    73,795
<PP&E>                                              288,593
<DEPRECIATION>                                      153,470
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      292,886
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               77,334
<BONDS>                                             185,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            1
<OTHER-SE>                                          (102,619)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        292,886
<SALES>                                             141,527
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    141,527
<CGS>                                               116,612
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       116,612
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    95
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  8,439
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     7,768
<INCOME-TAX>                                        832
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 6,936
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                        6,936
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                           GTECH HOLDINGS CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GTECH Holdings Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending November 27, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the Date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jaymin B. Patel, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
sections 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date: January 5, 2005                 /s/ Jaymin B. Patel
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Jaymin B. Patel, Senior Vice President and
                                      Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          10,872
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  335,538
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     41,261
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               390,167
<PP&E>                                       1,031,997
<DEPRECIATION>                               (285,119)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,187,731
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          370,915
<BONDS>                                        155,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        416
<COMMON>                                         3,255
<OTHER-SE>                                     361,417
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,187,731
<SALES>                                      1,208,989
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,213,664
<CGS>                                        1,077,870
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,077,870
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                82,382
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,027
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 37,385
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,645
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             23,586
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    25,586
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .56


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          32,192
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  135,250
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (8,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    176,786
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               336,228
<PP&E>                                         404,063
<DEPRECIATION>                               (254,136)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 709,211
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,986,184
<BONDS>                                          4,713
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,510
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,281,686)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   709,211
<SALES>                                        135,792
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               135,792
<CGS>                                          104,451
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,341
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               224,609
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,037
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (197,584)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (197,584)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.008)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.008)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 48.4082-3 Diesel fuel and kerosene; visual inspection devices. [Reserved]
(Logo of Williams & Webster, P.S.)


                              WILLIAMS & WEBSTER PS
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                        BANK OF AMERICA FINANCIAL CENTER
                           W 601 RIVERSIDE, SUITE 1940
                                SPOKANE, WA 99201
                                 (509) 838-5111


Board of Directors
Ramex Synfuels International, Inc.
Spokane, Washington

We consent to the use of  our review report dated September 6, 2000 on the
Financial Statements of Ramex Synfuels International, Inc. as of July 31, 2000,
for the filing with and attachment to the Form 10Q for the period ending
July 31, 2000.



/s/ Williams & Webster, P.S.


Williams & Webster, P.S.
Certified Public Accountants
Spokane,  Washington
September 15, 2000
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 51 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 51

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 Expressing the sense of the Congress concerning economic development, 
     environmental improvement, and stability in the Baltic region.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 51

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas from 1945 to the early 1990's Kaliningrad was a Russian 
        military outpost consisting of as many as 200,000 Russian 
        military personnel concentrated in an area of 15,000 square 
        kilometers and Kaliningrad has suffered substantial 
        environmental damage as a result of this military presence;
Whereas since this time the number of Russian military personnel in 
        Kaliningrad has declined significantly, although the number of 
        such personnel in the region is still substantial;
Whereas polls conducted by the Kaliningrad Sociological Center have 
        shown that over 60 percent of the Kaliningrad public favors 
        development of Kaliningrad as an economic bridge between Europe 
        and Russia;
Whereas establishment of Kaliningrad as a free economic zone by the 
        Russian Government in 1994 represents a positive step toward 
        Kaliningrad's integration into the Baltic and European 
        economies and toward giving Kaliningrad an opportunity to 
        flourish economically and to contribute substantially to the 
        well-being of the Baltic region; and
Whereas Russian economic analysts at the Russian Foreign Policy 
        Foundation have noted that militarization of Kaliningrad 
        ``corresponded neither to the needs of the population of the 
        region itself, nor to the necessities of its economic 
        development'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia have the right to self-
        determination which extends to the conduct of their foreign 
        policy regarding membership in the North Atlantic Treaty 
        Organization;
            (2) development of the Kaliningrad region as a free trade 
        zone will help ensure the freedom and future prosperity and 
        stability of the Baltic region; and
            (3) continued military reductions in and environmental 
        restoration of the Kaliningrad region will greatly facilitate 
        economic development and prosperity in Kaliningrad.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 26, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
|WELLS FARGO(logo) | Commercial Mortgage Servicing                                                 
|----------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                  | D1050-084, 8th Floor
401 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334



ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE



Reference is hereby made to that
certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2015, by and among Banc of America Merrill Lynch Commercial Mortgage
Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, A Division of PNC Bank,
National Association, as Special Servicer, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Trust Advisor, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee,
Certificate Administrator, Certificate Registrar, Authenticating Agent and Custodian with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates Series 2015-C25 (the “Agreement”). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the
meanings assigned in the Agreement.



Pursuant to Section 13.9 of the Agreement, I, Daniel
Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer
during the period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per
the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review,
the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting
Period.                                                      



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this
Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2018.



|/s/
    Daniel Bober     | 
|------------------------ | 
|Daniel Bober            
|Executive Vice President
|Wells Fargo Bank        



|Wells
    Fargo Bank, N.A. | Together we’ll go far
|-------------------------- | ---------------------
#### In the Matter of Ansel Caines, Appellant, v Robert Dennison, as Chairman of New York State Division of Parole, Respondent.

[803 NYS2d 457]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County (Mark H. Dadd, A.J.), entered August 3, 2004 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment dismissed the petition to review the determination of respondent denying petitioner’s request for release to parole.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs as moot *(see Matter of Ansari v Travis,*9 AD3d 901 [2004], *lv denied*3 NY3d 610 [2004]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Martoche, Pine and Hayes, JJ.