alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Health Resources and Services Administration 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Remy Aronoff, Executive Secretary, Healthcare Systems Bureau, Health Resources and Services Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Room 12-105, Rockville, Maryland 20857; telephone (301) 443-3264. 

Dated: August 4, 2009. 

Alexandra Huttinger, 

Director, Division of Policy Review and Coordination. 

 [FR Doc. E9-19110 Filed 8-10-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4165-15-P
§ 48.4083-1 Taxable fuel; administrative authority. ( a ) *In general* — ( 1 ) *Authority to inspect.* Officers or employees of the IRS designated by the Commissioner, upon presenting appropriate credentials and a written notice to the owner, operator, or agent in charge, are authorized to enter any place and to conduct inspections in accordance with paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section.
( 2 ) *Reasonableness.* Inspections will be performed in a reasonable manner and at times that are reasonable under the circumstances, taking into consideration the normal business hours of the place to be entered.
( b ) *Place of inspection* — ( 1 ) *In general.* Inspections may be at any place at which taxable fuel is (or may be) produced or stored or at any inspection site where evidence of activities described in section 6715(a) may be discovered. These places may include, but are not limited to— ( i ) Any terminal;
( ii ) Any fuel storage facility that is not a terminal;
( iii ) Any retail fuel facility; or
( iv ) Any designated inspection site.
( 2 ) *Designated inspection sites.* A designated inspection site is any State highway inspection station, weigh station, agricultural inspection station, mobile station, or other location designated by the Commissioner to be used as a fuel inspection site. A designated inspection site will be identified as a fuel inspection site.
( c ) *Scope of inspection* — ( 1 ) *Inspection.* Officers or employees may physically inspect, examine or otherwise search any tank, reservoir, or other container that can or may be used for the production, storage, or transportation of fuel, fuel dyes, or fuel markers. Inspection may also be made of any equipment used for, or in connection with, production, storage, or transportation of fuel, fuel dyes, or fuel markers. This includes any equipment used for the dyeing or marking of fuel. This also includes books and records, if any, that are maintained at the place of inspection and are kept to determine excise tax liability under section 4081.
( 2 ) *Detainment.* Officers or employees may detain any vehicle or train for the purpose of inspecting its fuel tanks and storage tanks. Detainment will be either on the premises under inspection or at a designated inspection site. Detainment may continue for such reasonable period of time as is necessary to determine the amount and composition of the fuel.
( 3 ) *Removal of samples.* Officers or employees may take and remove samples of fuel in such quantities as are reasonably necessary to determine the composition of the fuel.
( d ) *Refusal to submit to inspection.* For the penalty for any refusal to permit an entry or inspection authorized by this section, see section 4083(c)(3). This penalty is in addition to any tax that may be imposed by section 4041 or 4081 and any penalty that may be imposed by section 6715.
( e ) *Effective date.* This section is effective January 1, 1994.
[T.D. 8659, 61 FR 10458, Mar. 14, 1996, as amended by T.D. 8685, 61 FR 58007, Nov. 12, 1996; T.D. 8879, 65 FR 17159, Mar. 31, 2000]
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.6037-1 Return of electing small business corporation.

For provisions relating to requirement of return of electing small business corporation, see § 1.6037-1 of this chapter (Income Tax Regulations).
Exhibit 32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of HQ Sustainable Maritime Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Norbert Sporns, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the SarbanesOxley Act
of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 9, 2009



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Norbert Sporns     
|Norbert Sporns         
|Chief Executive Officer
#### § 1.9002-3 Election to have the provisions of section 481 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 not apply.

Section 4(a) of the Act provides that in the treatment of dealer reserve income by the taxpayer is changed to a method proper under the accrual method of accounting, then the taxpayer may elect to have such change treated as not a change in method of accounting to which the provisions of section 481 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 apply. This election shall apply to all taxable years ending on or before June 22, 1959, for which the assessment of any deficiency, or for which refund or credit of any overpayment, was not prevented on June 21, 1959, by the operation of any law or rule of law. This election may be made only if the alternative election under section 3(a) of the Act has not been exercised. If an election is made under section 4(a) of the Act, taxable income (or net income in the case of a taxable year to which the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 applies) shall be recomputed under a proper method of accounting for dealer reserve income for each taxable year to which the election applies, without regard to section 481.

[T.D. 6490, 25 FR 8372, Sept. 1, 1960]
Certification Pursuant To
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly Report of Universal Express, Inc. (the
"Company") on form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
A. Altomare, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
Certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d)
    of the securities Exchange Act of 1934: and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                  By:    /S/ RICHARD A. ALTOMARE
                                         --------------------------------------
                                         Richard A. Altomare,
                                         Chief Executive Officer and
                                         Chief Financial Officer
Date:  May 19, 2004













<PAGE>
Exhibit 35.3

OFFICERS CERTIFICATE

I, Karen Montbach, a
Managing Director of Citibank, N.A. (the Company), hereby certify, with respect to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the Agreement), dated as of November 1, 2016, between Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.,
as depositor, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as master servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as special servicer, TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as operating advisor and asset representations reviewer,
Citibank, N.A., as certificate administrator and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as trustee, the following:

1. A review of the
Companys activities as Certificate Administrator during the reporting period ending December 31, 2016 and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout the reporting period ending December 31, 2016.

This statement is given by the undersigned as an authorized officer of the
Company and not in the undersigneds individual capacity.

Date: February 27, 2017



Citibank, N.A.By:

/s/ Karen MontbachName:

Karen MontbachTitle:

Managing Director
<PAGE>
 
POTASH CORPORATION OF SASKATCHEWAN INC.
COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30
(Figures and amounts expressed in thousands, except per share and per option 
amounts)

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                                YTD-1997    YTD-1996   Q3-1997     Q3-1996
                                                               ---------   ---------  ---------   ---------
<S>     <C>                                                     <C>         <C>         <C>        <C> 
A       Net Income as reported, Canadian GAAP                  $224,763    $162,848    $71,418    $46,772
B       Items adjusting net income                             $(12,468)   $ (5,753)   $(8,176)   $(1,435)
C       Net income, US GAAP (A+B)                              $212,295    $157,095    $63,242    $45,337

D       Weighted average number of shares outstanding            51,765      45,525     53,724     45,549

E       Options outstanding to purchase equivalent                1,587       1,271      1,587      1,271

F       Average exercise price per option                        $52.90      $43.55     $52.90     $43.55

G       Average market price per share                           $78.37      $68.57     $76.00     $69.87

H       Period end market price per share                        $78.50      $66.25     $78.50     $73.13

I       Rate of Return available on option proceeds                0.05        0.05       0.05       0.05

CANADIAN GAAP

        Based earnings per share (A/D)                            $4.34       $3.58      $1.33      $1.03

J       Fully diluted earnings per share
        Imputed earnings on option proceeds (E*F)                 4,197       2,768      4,197      2,768

        Fully diluted earnings per share ((A+J)/(D+L))            $4.29       $3.54      $1.37      $1.06

UNITED STATES GAAP

K       Basic earnings per share
        Net additional shares issuable (E-(E*F/G))                  516         464        482        479

        Basic earnings per share (C/(D+K))                        $4.06       $3.42      $1.17      $0.98

L       Fully diluted earnings per share
        Net additional shares issuable (E-(E*F/H))                  517         435        517        514

        Fully diluted earnings per share (C/(D+L))                $4.06       $3.42      $1.17      $0.98

D+K     Weighted average shares for US GAAP                      52,281      45,989     54,206     46,028
</TABLE>
§ 31.3306(p)-1 Employees of related corporations. ( a ) *In general.* For purposes of sections 3301, 3302, and 3306(b)(1), when two or more related corporations concurrently employ the same individual and compensate that individual through a common paymaster which is one of the related corporations for which the individual performs services, each of the corporations is considered to have paid only the remuneration it actually disburses to that individual (unless the disbursing corporation fails to remit the taxes due). Paragraphs (b) and (c) of § 31.3121(s)-1 contain rules defining related corporations, common paymasters, and concurrent employment, and rules for determining the liability of the other related corporations for employment taxes if the common paymaster fails to remit the taxes pursuant to sections 3102 and 3111, and for allocating these taxes among the related corporations. Those rules also apply to the tax under section 3301. For purposes of applying those rules to this section, references in those rules to section 3111 are considered references to sections 3301 and 3302, and references to section 3121 are considered references to section 3306.
( b ) *Allocation of credit for contributions to State unemployment funds.* A special rule for applying the rules of § 31.3121(s)-1 to this section applies if it is necessary to determine the ultimate liability of each related corporation for which services are performed in the event the common paymaster fails to remit the tax to the Internal Revenue Service. In determining the ultimate liability of a corporation, the credit for contributions to State unemployment funds that the corporation may claim under section 3302 is calculated as if each corporation were a separate employer.
( c ) *Effective date.* This section is effective with respect to wages paid after December 31, 1978.
[T.D. 7660, 44 FR 75142, Dec. 19, 1979]
(logo) pwc

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

To the Board of Directors, PNCFinancial Services Group, Inc.:

 

We have examined management’sassertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance withRegulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Midland Loan Services, a division of PNCBank, National Association (“Midland” or the “Company”)complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of theSecurities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for all transactionsserviced on the *Enterprise!* Loan Management System (the“Platform”), as of December 31, 2016 and for the year then ended,excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C),1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to theservicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Managementis responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Ourresponsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on ourexamination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicableservicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessaryin the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected asset-backedtransactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selectedservicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether theCompany processed those selected transactions and performed those selectedactivities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedureswere limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed bythe Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were notdesigned to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurredprior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances oramounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by thisreport. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for ouropinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on theCompany’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that Midland complied with the aforementionedapplicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

February 17, 2017

 

 

*PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,1100 Walnut Street, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106*

*T: (816) 472 7921, F: (816)218 1890 www.pwc.com/us*
#### § 1.642(g)-1 Disallowance of double deductions; in general.

Amounts allowable under section 2053(a)(2) (relating to administration expenses) or under section 2054 (relating to losses during administration) as deductions in computing the taxable estate of a decedent are not allowed as deductions in computing the taxable income of the estate unless there is filed a statement, in duplicate, to the effect that the items have not been allowed as deductions from the gross estate of the decedent under section 2053 or 2054 and that all rights to have such items allowed at any time as deductions under section 2053 or 2054 are waived. The statement should be filed with the return for the year for which the items are claimed as deductions or with the district director for the internal revenue district in which the return was filed, for association with the return. The statement may be filed at any time before the expiration of the statutory period of limitation applicable to the taxable year for which the deduction is sought. Allowance of a deduction in computing an estate's taxable income is not precluded by claiming a deduction in the estate tax return, so long as the estate tax deduction is not finally allowed and the statement is filed. However, after a statement is filed under section 642(g) with respect to a particular item or portion of an item, the item cannot thereafter be allowed as a deduction for estate tax purposes since the waiver operates as a relinquishment of the right to have the deduction allowed at any time under section 2053 or 2054.
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.6851-1 Termination of taxable year.

For regulations under section 6851, see §§ 1.6851-1 to 1.6851-3, inclusive, of this chapter (Income Tax Regulations).
#### § 36.3121(l)(10)-4 Payment of amounts equivalent to tax.

A domestic corporation which has entered into an agreement as provided in § 36.3121(l)(1)-1 is not required to make deposits with an authorized financial institution of any amount for which liability is incurred under its agreement.

[T.D. 6145, 20 FR 6577, Sept. 8, 1955; 25 FR 14021, Dec. 31, 1960, as amended by T.D. 7953, 49 FR 19646, May 9, 1984; T.D. 8952, 66 FR 33832, June 26, 2001]
#### § 403.40 Place of filing.

The petition should be filed in triplicate with the District Director for the internal revenue district in which the property was seized.
----

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 12 December 2006 — Werners v Council and Commission

(Case T-373/94) (1)

(Actions for damages - Non-contractual liability - Milk - Additional levy - Reference quantity - Producers who entered into a non-marketing undertaking - SLOM 1984 producers - Failure to resume production on expiry of the undertaking)

(2006/C 331/60)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: R.W. Werners (Meppel, Netherlands) (represented by: initially H. Bronkhorst and E. Pijnacker Hordijk, lawyers, and subsequently E. Pijnacker Hordijk)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: initially A. Brautigam and A.-M. Colaert, Agents, and subsequently A.-M. Colaert,) and Commission of the European Communities (represented by: initially T. van Rijn, Agent, assisted by H.J. Rabe, lawyer, and subsequently T. van Rijn)

Re:

Action for compensation pursuant to Article 178 of the EC Treaty (now Article 235 EC) and the second paragraph of Article 215 of the EC Treaty (now the second paragraph of Article 288 EC) for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant by reason of the fact that he was prevented from marketing milk in accordance with Council Regulation (EEC) No 857/84 of 31 March 1984 adopting general rules for the application of the levy referred to in Article 5c of Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 in the milk and milk products sector (OJ 1984 L 90, p. 13), as supplemented by Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1371/84 of 16 May 1984 laying down detailed rules for the application of the additional levy referred to in Article 5c of Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 (OJ 1984 L 132, p. 11).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

----

(1)OJ C 370, 24.12.1994.

----
# 265-/5 ELECTRONIC RECORD
COA #14-13-00900-CR 

### OFFENSE: Capital Murder STYLE: Lakendrick Earl Jacobs v The State ofTexas COUNTY: Harris COA DISPOSITION: Affirmed th 

### TRIAL COURT: 3381" District Court DATE: February 19, 2015 Publish: No TC CASE #: 1289471

IN THE COURTOF CRIMINALAPPEALS STYLE: Lakendrick Earl Jacobs v The State ofTexas 

### CCA # 

# PkO SE Petition CCADisposition: FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: DATE: 

# a4*5W/ DATE: Obl&tUr JUDGE: 

# ^R '>***• JUDGE:. SIGNED: PUBLISH: PC: DNP:
FOR REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: MOTION FOR
ELECTRONICRECORD
Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement - Matthew Veal



 EXHIBIT 10.25 
 January 25, 2007 
 Matthew Veal 
 7937 Broadmoor
Pines Blvd. 
 Sarasota, FL 34243 
  

	 	Re:	Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement 

 Dear
Matthew: 
 This document is intended to memorialize the amendment of your Employment Agreement, dated May 29, 2006. 
 Our signatures below confirm that we have agreed to modify the Employment Agreement in Section 1 only as described below as follows: 
  

	1.	EMPLOYMENT; DUTIES. 

 The provision, as originally written
has been deleted in its entirety and is amended to read as follows: 
 The Company shall employ Executive as Controller and as Principal or Chief Accounting
Officer and as Acting Secretary, and Executive accepts such employment under the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Executive’s duties shall be consistent with those of a Controller, Chief Accounting Officer as defined from time
to time by the Company’s board of directors (the “Board”) and the Chief Executive Officer. 
 APPROVED AND AGREED: 
  

							
	DATE: 1/25/07	  	 	 	 	 	Matthew Veal
				
		  		 		 	 /s/ Matthew Veal

				
	DATE: 1/25/07	  		 		 	Sun Energy Solar, Inc.
				
		  		 		 	 /s/ Carl L. Smith

		  		 		 	Carl L. Smith
		  		 		 	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer