alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 69

Providing for the reappointment of Homer Alfred Neal as a citizen regent

of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 24, 1995

Mr. MINETA (for himself, Mr. LIVINGSTON, and Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas)

introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Oversight

JOINT RESOLUTION

Providing for the reappointment of Homer Alfred Neal as

a citizen regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Stat4 utes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on

5 the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in

6 the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by

7 reason of the expiration of the term of Homer Alfred Neal

8 of Michigan on December 6, 1995, is filled by the re-
2

•HJ 69 IH

1 appointment of the incumbent for a term of six years, ef2 fective December 7, 1995.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1
                                  Certification
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                                   As Adopted
                         Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                                   Sarbanes -
                                Oxley Act of 2002

         In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of HQ  Sustainable  Maritime
Industries,  Inc. (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31,
2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission  ("SEC") on the date
hereof  (the  "Report"),  the  undersigned  officer  of the  Company  certifies,
pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:


         1.       the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

         A signed  original of this written  statement  has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and will be  furnished to the SEC or
its staff upon request.


 /s/ Norbert Sporns
----------------------------
Norbert Sporns
Chief Executive Officer

May 13, 2005




         This  Certification of Chief Executive  Officer pursuant to Section 906
of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002. This exhibit is not "filed" for purposes of
Section 18 of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 but is instead  furnished as
provided by applicable rules of the Securities Exchange Commission.
§ 1.6709-1T Penalties with respect to mortgage credit certificates (temporary). ( a ) *Material misstatement* — ( 1 ) *Negligence.* If any person makes a material misstatement in any affidavit or other statement under a penalty of perjury made with respect to the issuance of a mortgage credit certificate and such misstatement is due to the negligence of that person, that person shall pay a penalty of $1,000 for each mortgage credti certificate with respect to which that misstatement was made.
( 2 ) *Fraud.* If a misstatement described in subparagraph (1) is due to fraud on the part of the person making the misstatement, that person shall pay a penalty of $10,000 for each mortgage credit certificate with respect to which the fraudulent misstatement was made. The penalty imposed by this paragraph (a)(2) is in addition to any criminal penalty.
( b ) *Reports.* ( 1 ) Any person required by § 1.25-8T to file a report with respect to any mortgage credit certificate who fails to file the report at the time and in the manner required by § 1.25-8T shall pay a penalty of $200 for each mortgage credit certificate with respect to which that failure occurred. The preceding sentence shall not apply if it is shown that such failure is due to reasonable cause and not to willful neglect.
( 2 ) In the case of any report required under § 1.25-8T(b), the aggregate amount of the penalty imposed by this paragraph shall not exceed $2,000.
[T.D. 8023, 50 FR 19355, May 8, 1985] JEOPARDY, BANKRUPTCY, AND RECEIVERSHIPS
39593.

#### SIMS v. THE STATE.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

The defendant, after pleading not guilty, waived jury trial and was tried and convicted by the court for the offense of burglary. A motion for new trial, on the usual general grounds only, was overruled and error is assigned on such adverse judgment. The defendant was indicted and tried for having burglarized the residence of the prosecuting witness. This witness identified the defendant as having been in her bedroom when she was awakened at about one o’clock in the morning. The witness further testified that a light was on in the bedroom, that entry into the house was gained by removing a screen from a window, and that a sum of money was missing after the defendant escaped through either the front or rear door of the house. The defense, introduced evidence which, if believed, would have established alibi. *Held:*

1. “One witness for the State positively identified the defendant as being the person who broke and entered the residence. This was sufficient identification to authorize the verdict. *Mathews v. State,*86 Ga. 782 (1) (13 SE 16); *Berry v. State,*29 Ga. App. 282, 283 (2) (114 SE 922).” *Thompson v. State,*76 Ga. App. 239 (2) (45 SE2d 675).

*482Decided September 5, 1962.

*John J. Sullivan,*for plaintiff in error.

*Andrew J. Ryan, Jr., Solicitor General, Sylvan A. Garfunkel, Robert E. Barker, Assistant Solicitors General,*contra.

2. Where a witness for the State testifies positively that the defendant is the person who burglarized her residence a conviction is authorized although several witnesses testify as to facts which would establish a perfect alibi for the defendant. *Smith v. State,*76 Ga. App. 240 (45 SE2d 473).

3. The evidence authorized the conviction, and the trial court did not err in overruling the defendant’s motion for new trial based on the usual general grounds only.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Frankum and Jordan, JJ., concur.*
DRAFT (FOCUS 7/10/03)

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 03-0633 ENGINEER: Macek/CLH PV (kg/yr):

SUBMITTER:

USE:

OTHER USES:

MSDS:

CRSS (6/30/03): Chemical Category:

VP: torr @25 E C
S-H 2 O: g/L

MW: Phys State:

Consumer Use: No

SAT (7/1/03): Ground Water: negligible Health: 1 (No exposures needed) Eco: 3 (All releases to water)
PBT: P1B1T1

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: NRINITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 03-0633

ASSUMPTIONS:

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEWINITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 03-0633
AMENDMENT TO 1991 EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTION PLAN



 Exhibit 10.2 
 TERADYNE, INC. 
 Amendment 
 To 
 1991 Employee Stock Option Plan 
 This Amendment to the 1991 Employee Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”), of Teradyne, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”),
is adopted by resolution of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) pursuant to a meeting of the Board dated as of January 22-23, 2007 and effective as of January 23, 2007 (the “Effective Date”). Paragraph
6.D Determination of Fair Market Value of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following as of the Effective Date: 
 “D. Determination of Fair Market Value. If, at the time an Option is granted under the Plan, the Company’s Common Stock is publicly traded, “fair market value” shall be determined as of the date of such
Option is granted and shall mean (i) the closing price (on that date) of the Common Stock on the principal national securities exchange on which the Common Stock is traded, if the Common Stock is then traded on a national securities exchange;
or (ii) the closing bid price (or average of bid prices) last quoted (on that date) by an established quotation service for over-the-counter securities, if the Common Stock is not then traded on a national securities exchange. However, if the
Common Stock is not publicly traded at the time an Option is granted under the Plan, “fair market value” shall be deemed to be the fair market value of the Common Stock as determined by the Committee after taking into consideration all
factors which it deems appropriate, including, without limitation, recent sale and offer prices of the Common Stock in private transactions negotiated at arm’s length.”
IV

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 60

Commending India for its commitment to religious pluralism and tolerance.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 6, 1995

Mr. ROSE (for himself and Mr. GILMAN) submitted the following concurrent

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Commending India for its commitment to religious pluralism

and tolerance.

Whereas in 1920, Mohandas K. Ghandhi initiated a popular

movement against the British colonialists which eventually led to Indian independence in 1947;

Whereas that movement, known as ‘‘satayagraha’’, has become synonymous with nonviolent passive resistance;

Whereas India was founded as a secular republic, stressing

tolerance and respect for all religions;

Whereas few other nations have been so prolific in religious

thought or have been the birthplace of faiths which have

been followed by so many throughout the world;

Whereas India is now the world’s largest democracy with over

900,000,000 people, comprised of Hindus, Moslems,
2

•HCON 60 IH

Christians, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jews, Jains, Parsis, and

other ethnic and religious minorities; and

Whereas the Constitution of India grants specific rights for

religious groups to follow their own religious laws: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That—

3 (1) the Government of India should be com4 mended for its commitment to religious pluralism

5 and tolerance;

6 (2) the Government of India should be recog7 nized for its willingness to give refuge to displaced

8 victims of religious persecution; and

9 (3) the people of the United States recognize

10 and appreciate the enormous contributions of India

11 to the cause of religious harmony throughout the

12 world.

Æ
§ 53.6694-4 Extension of period of collection when tax return preparer pays 15 percent of a penalty for understatement of taxpayer's liability and certain other procedural matters. ( a ) *In general.* For rules relating to the extension of period of collection when a tax return preparer who prepared a return or claim for refund of tax under Chapter 42 of the Internal Revenue Code pays 15 percent of a penalty for understatement of taxpayer's liability and procedural matters relating to the investigation, assessment and collection of the penalties under section 6694(a) and (b), the rules under § 1.6694-4 of this chapter will apply.
( b ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section is applicable to returns and claims for refund filed, and advice provided, after December 31, 2008.
[T.D. 9436, 73 FR 78458, Dec. 22, 2008]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          10,872
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  335,538
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     41,261
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               390,167
<PP&E>                                       1,031,997
<DEPRECIATION>                               (285,119)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,187,731
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          370,915
<BONDS>                                        155,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              416
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,255
<OTHER-SE>                                     361,417
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,187,731
<SALES>                                      1,208,989
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,213,664
<CGS>                                        1,077,870
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,077,870
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                82,382
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,027
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 37,385
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,645
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             23,586
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,586
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .56


</TABLE>
§ 40.7701-1 Tax return preparer. ( a ) *In general.* For the definition of a tax return preparer, see § 301.7701-15 of this chapter.
( b ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section is applicable to returns and claims for refund filed, and advice provided, after December 31, 2008.
[T.D. 9436, 73 FR 78455, Dec. 22, 2008]
#### In the Matter of Corey Ford, Petitioner, v Joseph Smith, as Superintendent of Shawangunk Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

[805 NYS2d 663]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule that prohibits smuggling any item in or out of the correctional facility. The charges stem from an incident in the visiting room wherein petitioner was observed sliding a piece of paper to his visitor, who then read it and placed it in her purse. The paper was later discovered to have a name, phone number and Social Security number printed on it. Petitioner admitted that he did not have prior authorization to exchange any written information with his visitor. We are unpersuaded by petitioner’s contention that there were any significant gaps in the hearing transcript which would preclude meaningful judicial review *(see Matter of Michaelides v Goord,*300 AD2d 718, 719 [2002]; *Matter of Kalid v Farrell,*284 AD2d 603, 603 [2001]). To that end, the misbehavior report, supporting memoranda, testimony at the hearing and videotape of the incident provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt *(see Matter of Brown v Goord,*9 AD3d 646 [2004], *830
      *lv denied*3 NY3d 612 [2004]). Petitioner’s remaining contentions, to the extent that they are properly before this Court, have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Peters, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
#### § 50.8 Due date and place for filing returns and paying tax.

The return for a taxable year shall be filed with, and the tax shall be paid to, the district director at San Francisco, California, on or before September 30 of the calendar year in which the taxable year ends. The tax is due and payable on such date without assessment by, or notice from, the district director.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 197 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J. Res.197

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

                            Joint Resolution

 
  Waiving certain enrollment requirements with respect to any bill or 
 joint resolution of the One Hundred Fourth Congress making general or 
             continuing appropriations for fiscal year 1997.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF REQUIREMENT FOR PARCHMENT PRINTING.

    (a) Waiver.--The provisions of sections 106 and 107 of title 1, 
United States Code, are waived with respect to the printing (on 
parchment or otherwise) of the enrollment of any appropriation measure 
of the One Hundred Fourth Congress presented to the President after the 
enactment of this joint resolution.
    (b) Certification of Enrollment by Committee on House Oversight.--
The enrollment of any such measure shall be in such form as the 
Committee on House Oversight of the House of Representatives certifies 
to be a true enrollment.

SEC. 2. APPROPRIATION MEASURE DEFINED.

    For purposes of this joint resolution, the term ``appropriation 
measure'' means a bill or joint resolution that includes provisions 
making general or continuing appropriations for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 1997.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
II

Calendar No. 278

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 112

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 8, 1995

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and

Administration

DECEMBER 14, 1995

Reported by Mr. WARNER, without amendment

JOINT RESOLUTION

Providing for the appointment of Louis Gerstner as a citizen

regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian

Institution.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Stat4 utes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on

5 the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in

6 the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by

7 reason of the resignation of Ira Michael Heyman of Cali-
2

HJ 112 RS

1 fornia on May 27, 1994, is filled by the appointment of

2 Louis Gerstner of Connecticut. The appointment is for a

3 term of six years and shall take effect on the date on which

4 this joint resolution becomes law.

Passed the House of Representatives November 7,

1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.

Calendar No. 278

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 112

JOINT RESOLUTION

Providing for the appointment of Louis Gerstner as

Smithsonian Institution.a citizen regent of the Board of Regents of the

DECEMBER 14, 1995

Reported without amendment
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>          THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
                  FROM FORM 10-Q OF BERLITZ INTERNATIONAL, INC. FOR THE
                  QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
                  ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>               1,000
       
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                         MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                               28,404
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        48,063
<ALLOWANCES>                                         2,831
<INVENTORY>                                          9,788
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     99,197
<PP&E>                                               51,221
<DEPRECIATION>                                       18,602
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       659,312
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                98,202
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             1,003
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           344,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         659,312
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     104,656
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        63,231
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     4,339
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2,849
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      297
<INCOME-TAX>                                         205
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  23
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         23
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.00
        

</TABLE>
#### § 1.9101-1 Permission to submit information required by certain returns and statements on magnetic tape.

In any case where the use of a Form 1087 or 1099 is required by the regulations under this part for the purpose of making a return or reporting information, such requirement may be satisfied by submitting the information required by such form on magnetic tape or by other media, provided that the prior consent of the Commissioner or other authorized officer or employee of the Internal Revenue Service has been obtained. Applications for such consent must be filed in accordance with procedures established by the Internal Revenue Service. In any case where the use of Form W-2 is required for the purpose of making a return or reporting information, such requirement may be satisfied by submitting the information required by such form on magnetic tape or other approved media, provided that the prior consent of the Commissioner of Social Security (or other authorized officer or employee thereof) has been obtained.

[T.D. 6883, 31 FR 6589, May 3, 1966, as amended by T.D. 7580, 43 FR 60159, Dec. 26, 1978]