alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certainPooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2015, by and amongWELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGOBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC,as Special Servicer, PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGOBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administratorand as Custodian and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, withrespect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-NXS4 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 of thisAgreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Services dohereby certify that:

 

1.       Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.       To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilledall of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasexecuted this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells  Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Herbert T. Jones, Appellant, v Joseph J. Costello, as Superintendent of Mid-State Correctional Facility, Respondent.

[803 NYS2d 486]

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (John J. Brunetti, A.J.), entered March 8, 2004. The judgment dismissed the petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

*1122It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs as moot *(see Matter of Ansari v Travis,*9 AD3d 901 [2004], *lv denied*3 NY3d 610 [2004]). Present—Kehoe, J.P., Martoche, Pine, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **0 -**  **69 3**  **2**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appell ee ,
v. SEAN ANTHONY ROBINSON, a/k/a Black , Defendant

– Appell ant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Ea stern District of Virginia , at R ichmond
. Henry E. Hudson , District Judge. ( 3 :0 6

- c r - 002 04

- HEH

- 1 )

Submitted : October 19 , 2010 Decided: October 28, 2010

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judge s .
Dismiss ed by un published per curia m opinion
. Sean Anthony Robinson , Appellant Pro Se. Gurney Wingate Grant, II , Roderick Charles Young, Assistant United States Attorney s , Richmond , Virginia , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Se an Anthony Robinson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2010 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demon strating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district co urt denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have inde pendently reviewed the record and conclude that Robinson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequa tely presented in the materials3 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 18 (Thursday, January 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 5154]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1912]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2157-167-Washington]


Snohomish County; Public Utility District No. 1; Notice of 
Designation of Commission Staff as Non-Decisional

January 22, 2009.
    Commission staff member Bob Easton (Office of Energy Projects, 202-
502-6045; <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#62100d000710164c070311160d0c22040710014c050d14"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="14667b767166603a717567607b7a54727166773a737b62">[email protected]</span></a>) is designated as ``non-decisional'' 
staff and assigned to participate in settlement discussions and provide 
guidance on the Commission's policies and authorities for the Jackson 
Hydroelectric Project in the above-referenced proceeding.
    As ``non-decisional'' staff, Mr. Easton will not participate in an 
advisory capacity in the Commission's review of any offer of settlement 
or settlement agreement, or deliberations concerning the disposition of 
the relicense application in the above-referenced proceeding.
    Different Commission ``advisory staff'' will be assigned to review 
any offer of settlement or settlement agreement, and to process the 
relicense application, including providing advice to the Commission 
with respect to the agreement and the application. Non-decisional staff 
and advisory staff are prohibited from communicating with one another 
concerning the merits of the settlement and the relicense application.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-1912 Filed 1-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 1.274-7 Treatment of certain expenditures with respect to entertainment-type facilities.

If deductions are disallowed under § 1.274-2 with respect to any portion of a facility, such portion shall be treated as an asset which is used for personal, living, and family purposes (and not as an asset used in a trade or business). Thus, the basis of such a facility will be adjusted for purposes of computing depreciation deductions and determining gain or loss on the sale of such facility in the same manner as other property (for example, a residence) which is regarded as used partly for business and partly for personal purposes.

[T.D. 6659, 28 FR 6507, June 25, 1963]
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 151 (Friday, August 7, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39679-39680]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18901]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force

[Docket ID: USAF-2009-0049]


Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

AGENCY: Department of the Air Force, DoD.

ACTION: Notice to Delete a System of Records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Air Force proposes to delete a system of 
records to its inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act 
of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

[[Page 39680]]


DATES: This proposed action will be effective without further notice on 
September 8, 2009 unless comments are received which result in a 
contrary determination.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the Air Force Privacy Act Officer, Office 
of Warfighting Integration and Chief Information Officer, SAF/XCPPI, 
1800 Air Force Pentagon, Suite 220, Washington, DC 20330-1800.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Ben Swilley at (703) 696-6648.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department of the Air Force systems of 
records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as 
amended, have been published in the Federal Register and are available 
from the address above.
    The Department of the Air Force proposes to delete one system of 
records notice from its inventory of recorded systems subject to the 
Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. The proposed deletion 
is not within the purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974, 
(U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the submission of a new or 
altered system report.

    Dated: July 23, 2009.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

    Deletion:
F038 AFMC A

SYSTEM NAME:
    Manhour Accounting System (MAS). (June 11, 1997, 62 FR 31793).

REASON:
    The records are no longer maintained in this system. Therefore, 
this notice should be deleted.

[FR Doc. E9-18901 Filed 8-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
(logo)Deutsche Bank

1761East St. Andrew Place

SantaAna, CA 92705-4934

 

Tel714 247 6000

Fax714 247 6009 

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT ASTO COMPLIANCE

 

DBJPM 2016-SFCMortgage Trust

 

Theundersigned, David Co, a Director of Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as theCertificate Administrator (a "Certifying Servicer") under the Trust andServicing Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2016 (the "Agreement"), byand among, Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor, WellsFargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Pacific Life Insurance Company,as Special Servicer , Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, andDeutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Certificate Administrator, PayingAgent, and Custodian, here by certifies in accordance with Section 11.07 of theAgreement:

 

A)   A review of such Certifying Servicer's activities from January 1, 2017 to December31, 2017 (the "reporting period") and of such Certifying Servicer's performanceunder the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision and

B)   That, as to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such CertifyingServicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement, in all materialrespects throughout the reporting period.

 

DEUTSCHEBANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS

asCertificate Administrator

 

/s/David Co

BY:David Co

Title:Director

Date:March 1, 2018
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 168

JOINT RESOLUTION

Waiving certain enrollment requirements with reCongress. spect to two bills of the One Hundred Fourth
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 168

JOINT RESOLUTION

Waiving certain enrollment requirements with respect to two

bills of the One Hundred Fourth Congress.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the provisions of sections 106 and 107 of title 1,

4 United States Code, are waived with respect to the print5 ing (on parchment or otherwise) of the enrollment of H.R.
2

•HJ 168 EH

1 3019 and the enrollment of H.R. 3136, each of the One

2 Hundred Fourth Congress. The enrollment of either such

3 bill shall be in such form as the Committee on House

4 Oversight of the House of Representatives certifies to be

5 a true enrollment.

Passed the House of Representatives March 26,

1996.

Attest:

Clerk.
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: The regulations contained in this part have been recodified in 46 CFR part 287.

§ 2.1-19 Requirements as to new vessels. ( a ) *Requirements.* For the purposes of section 511 of the Act and the regulations in this part, the new vessel must be— ( 1 ) Documented under the laws of the United States when it is acquired by the taxpayer, or the taxpayer must agree that when acquired it will be documented under the laws of the United States;
( 2 ) ( i ) Constructed in the United States after December 31, 1939, or
( ii ) its construction has been financed under title V or title VII of the Act, or
( iii ) its construction has been aided by a mortgage insured under title XI of the Act; and
( 3 ) Either ( i ) of such type, size, and speed as the Administration determines to be suitable for use on the high seas or Great Lakes in carrying out the purposes of the Act, but of not less than 2,000 gross tons or of less speed than 12 knots, except that a particular vessel may be of lesser tonnage or speed if the Administration determines and certifies that the particular vessel is desirable for use by the United States in case of war or national emergency, or
( ii ) constructed to replace a vessel or vessels requisitioned or purchased by the United States, in which event it must be of such type, size, and speed as to constitute a suitable replacement for the vessel requisitioned or purchased, but if a vessel already built is acquired to replace a vessel or vessels requisitioned or purchased by the United States, such vessel must meet the requirements set forth in subdivision (i) of this subparagraph. Ordinarily, under subdivision (i) of this subparagraph, a vessel constructed more than five years before the date on which deposits in a construction reserve fund are to be expended or obligated for acquisition of such vessel will not be considered suitable for use in carrying out the purpose of the Act, except that the five-year age limitation provided above in this sentence shall not apply to a vessel to be reconstructed before being placed in operation by the taxpayer.
( b ) *Time of construction.* A vessel will be deemed to be constructed after December 31, 1939, only if construction was commenced after that date. Subject to the provisions of this section, a new vessel may be newly built for the taxpayer, or may be acquired after it is built.
( c ) *Replacement of vessels.* It is not necessary that vessels shall be replaced vessel for vessel. The new vessels may be more or less in number than the replaced vessels, provided the other requirements of this section are met.
----

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 16 November 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof te Amsterdam (Netherlands)) — Compaq Computer International Corporation v Inspecteur der Belastingdienst — Douanedistrict Arnhem

(Case C-306/04) (1)

(Customs value - Laptop computers equipped with operating systems software)

(2006/C 331/22)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Gerechtshof te Amsterdam (Netherlands)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Compaq Computer International Corporation

Defendant: Inspecteur der Belastingdienst — Douanedistrict Arnhem

Re:

Preliminary ruling — Gerechtshof te Amsterdam — Interpretation of Article 32(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ 1992 L 302, p. 1) — Customs value of goods — Portable computers incorporating operating software at the time of their importation

Operative part of the judgment

In order to determine the customs value of imports of computers equipped by the seller with software for one or more operating systems made available by the buyer to the seller free of charge, in accordance with Article 32(1)(b) or (c) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code, the value of the software must be added to the transaction value of the computers if the value of the software has not been included in the price actually paid or payable for those computers.

The same is true when the national authorities accept as the transaction value, in accordance with Community law, the price of a sale other than that made by the Community purchaser. In such cases, ‘buyer’ for the purposes of Article 32(1)(b) or (c) of the Customs Code must be understood to mean the buyer who concluded that other sale.

----

(1)OJ C 228, 11.9.2004.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                         1,850
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,850
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,850
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          166,361
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       143,234
<OTHER-SE>                                     (309,595)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,850
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               4,920
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,920)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.00
        


</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.6682-1 False information with respect to withholding allowances based on itemized deductions.

For regulations under section 6682, see § 31.6682-1 of this chapter (Employment Tax Regulations).

[T.D. 7109, 35 FR 16544, Oct. 23, 1970]
§ 513.8 Addressee not actual owner. ( a ) If any person with an address in Ireland who receives a dividend from a United States corporation with respect to which United States tax at the rate of only 15 percent has been withheld at source is a nominee or representative through whom such dividend flows to a person other than one described in § 513.2(a) as being entitled to such reduced rate of 15 percent, such recipient in Ireland will withhold an additional amount of United States tax equivalent to the difference between the United States tax which would have been withheld had the convention not been in effect (30 percent as of the date of approval of this subpart) and the 15 percent withheld at the source with respect to such dividend pursuant to § 513.2(d).
( b ) In any case in which a fiduciary or partnership with an address in Ireland receives, otherwise than as a nominee or representative, a dividend from a United States corporation with respect to which United States tax at the rate of only 15 percent has been withheld at source, if a beneficiary of such fiduciary or a partner in such partnership is not entitled to the reduced rate of tax provided in Article VI(1) of the convention, the fiduciary or partnership will withhold an additional amount of United States tax with respect to the portion of such dividend included in such beneficiary's share of the distributed or distributable income, or in such partner's distributive share of the income, of such fiduciary or partnership, as the case may be. The amount of the additional tax is to be calculated in the same manner as under paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) If any amount of United States tax is released pursuant to § 513.7(a) by the withholding agent in the United States with respect to a dividend received by such a person with an address in Ireland, the latter will also withhold from such released amount any additional amount of United States tax, otherwise required to be withheld by the preceding provisions of this section in respect of such dividend, in the same manner as if at the time of payment of such dividend United States tax at the rate of only 15 percent had been withheld at source therefrom.
( d ) The amounts so withheld by such withholding agents in Ireland will be deposited, without converting such amounts into United States dollars, with the Irish Revenue Commissioners on or before the 15th day after the close of the calendar year quarter in which such withholding in Ireland occurs. Each withholding agent making such deposit will render therewith the appropriate Irish form as prescribed in regulations made by the Revenue Commissioners. The Revenue Commissioners have arranged that the amounts so deposited will be remitted by draft in United States dollars to the District Director of Internal Revenue, Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A., on or before the end of the calendar month in which the deposits are made, such draft to be accompanied by the Irish form rendered by the withholding agents in Ireland in connection with such deposits.
(logo)CWCapital

ASSETMANAGEMENT

**Annual Statement asto Compliance**

**For the Period ofJanuary 1, 2018 to July 19, 2018**

 

**WFCM 2016-LC25**

 

Inaccordance with Item 1123 of Regulation AB and****with the requirementsdetailed in §11.09 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”)for the above-mentioned CMBS pool, CWCapital Asset Management LLC (“CWCAM”),in its capacity as Special Servicer, is providing this Officer’s Certificatewith respect to the following:

 

(A)      a review of CWCAM’s activities during the preceding calendar year or portionthereof (the “Reporting Period”) and of CWCAM’s performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer’s supervision and;

 

(B)      to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, CWCAM hasfulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period. 

 

Shouldyou have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

 

Sincerely,

CWCapitalAsset Management LLC

/s/James P. Shevlin

JamesP. Shevlin 

President/ChiefOperating Officer

 

 

7501Wisconsin Avenue | Suite 500 West | Bethesda, MD | 20814