alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 66

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States with

respect to the number of terms of office of Members of the Senate

and House of Representatives.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 27, 1995

Mr. DEAL of Georgia (for himself, Mr. MINGE, Mr. MEEHAN, and Mr. KINGSTON) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States with respect to the number of terms of office

of Members of the Senate and House of Representatives.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each house concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

8 States within seven years from the date of its submission

9 by the Congress:
2

HJ 66 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE—

2 ‘‘No person who has been elected to the Senate two

3 times shall be eligible for election or appointment to the

4 Senate. No person who has been elected to the House of

5 Representatives six times shall be eligible for election to

6 the House of Representatives. A State may establish limi7 tations on the length of service for Members of Congress

8 from that State provided said limitations do not exceed

9 the limits set forth in this article.’’.

Æ
§ 56.6694-2 Penalties for understatement due to an unreasonable position. ( a ) *In general.* A person who is a tax return preparer of any return or claim for refund of excise tax under chapter 41 of subtitle D of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) shall be subject to penalties under section 6694(a) of the Code in the manner stated in § 1.6694-2 of this chapter.
( b ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section is applicable to returns and claims for refund filed, and advice provided, after December 31, 2008.
[T.D. 9436, 73 FR 78460, Dec. 22, 2008]
ENCLOSURE 2

CERTIFICATION OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ACTIVITIES

AND COMPLIANCE WITH

STATE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

As required by 40 CFR 51.102 and Section 2.1 of Appendix V of 40 CFR Part 51, the 

following information regarding public participation activities and compliance with state 

administrative procedures is provided.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ACTIVITIES

As required by 40 CFR 51.102(a), a public comment period to provide the opportunity 

to submit written comments concerning a proposed revision to the Commonwealth of 

Virginia State Implementation Plan was held from April 21 to May 21, 2014.

As required by 40 CFR Part 51.102(a) and (d)(1) and (2), the public was given notice of 

the public comment period in the Virginia Register of Regulations, along with the 

location of the proposal for public inspection, on April 2, 2014. The notice included 

procedures to afford the public the opportunity to request that a hearing be held 

pursuant to 40 CFR 51.102(a); no such request was received. The attached copy of the 

notice provides the evidence required by Section 2.1(f) of Appendix V of 40 CFR Part 

51. 

The Regional Administrator for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency was notified 

of the public comment period, as was each local air pollution control agency which will 

be significantly affected by the revision and is located in the affected Air Quality Control 

Regions. In addition, the District of Columbia, Maryland and Tennessee, which share 

affected interstate Air Quality Control Regions with Virginia, were notified of the public 

comment period. These notifications follow the requirements of 40 CFR Part 

51.102(d)(3), (4) and (5).

COMPLIANCE WITH STATE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

As required by Section 2.1(b) of Appendix V of 40 CFR Part 51, the regulation

amendments were published in the Virginia Register of Regulations on February 10, 

2014 after being duly adopted by the State Air Pollution Control Board on June 21, 

2013, certified by the Office of the Attorney General as within the Board’s statutory 

authority on June 26, 2013 and thus fully enforceable under Virginia law, and submitted 

to the Virginia Registrar on behalf of the board by the Department of Environmental 

Quality as a true and accurate copy of the duly adopted regulation on January 10, 

2014, providing the evidence required by Section 2.1(b) and (e) of Appendix V of 40 

CFR Part 51. As required by Section 2.1(d) of Appendix V of 40 CFR Part 51, a copy of 

the actual regulation submitted for approval and incorporation by reference into the 

Commonwealth of Virginia State Implementation Plan is attached, along with the 

effective date of March 27, 2014.

SIP\NONATTN PLANS\2015\H13-SIP-2.DOC
#### § 1.6031(b)-2T REMIC reporting requirements (temporary). [Reserved]
#### In the Matter of Ronald Davidson, Appellant, v Robert Dennison, as Chair of the Board of Parole, Respondent.

[805 NYS2d 297]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Clemente, J.), entered December 15, 2004 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Since the determination giving rise to this CPLR article 78 proceeding, petitioner has reappeared before the Board of Parole and again was denied parole release. Accordingly, the instant appeal is now moot and must be dismissed *(see Matter of Lenihan v Travis,*17 AD3d 740 [2005]). Furthermore, we are unpersuaded by petitioner’s contention that this matter presents an exception to the mootness doctrine *(see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne,*50 NY2d 707, 714-715 [1980]).

Spain, J.P., Carpinello, Mugglin, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
#### § 40.6101-1 Period covered by returns.

See § 40.6011(a)-1(a)(2) for the rules relating to the period covered by the return.

[T.D. 8963, 66 FR 41776, Aug. 9, 2001]
#### Sampson Tkaczyk et al. *v.*Herman Levine, Administrator (Estate of Olga Gallagher), et al.

*Sampson Tkaczyk*and *Evelyn*Tkaczyk, pro se, in support of the motion.

Submitted January 7

decided January 21, 1964

So far as the document dated January 7,1964, entitled “motion por an order pertaining to clerk EDWARD HOEWITZ WITH REVIEW OP ACTION TAKEN BY THE 5 SUPERIOR COURT JUDGES WHO SAT ON THIS CASE, COMBINED WITH BRIEP ON MOTION TO REARGUE” purports to be a motion, it is denied.
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.6312-2 Certain Treasury savings notes acceptable in payment of certain internal revenue taxes. According to the express terms of their issue, the following series of Treasury savings notes are presently acceptable in payment of income taxes (current and back, personal and corporation taxes, and excess profits taxes) and estate and gift taxes (current and back): ( a ) Treasury Savings Notes, Series A,
( b ) Treasury Savings Notes, Series B,
( c ) Treasury Savings Notes, Series C.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Motor vehicle use map. SiuslawNational Forest, Oregon. Central Coast Ranger District**
 
2011 | 2013| 2015 | 2016| 2017
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.28:SI 9/9/
Item Number:0080-G (online)
CGP systemNumber:000925106
 
January 4, 2018
§ 1.684-4 Outbound migrations of domestic trusts. ( a ) *In general.* If a U.S. person transfers property to a domestic trust, and such trust becomes a foreign trust, and neither trust is treated as owned by any person under subpart E of part I of subchapter J, chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code, the trust shall be treated for purposes of this section as having transferred all of its assets to a foreign trust and the trust is required to recognize gain on the transfer under § 1.684-1(a). The trust must also comply with the rules of section 6048.
( b ) *Date of transfer.* The transfer described in this section shall be deemed to occur immediately before, but on the same date that, the trust meets the definition of a foreign trust set forth in section 7701(a)(31)(B).
( c ) *Inadvertent migrations.* In the event of an inadvertent migration, as defined in § 301.7701-7(d)(2) of this chapter, a trust may avoid the application of this section by complying with the procedures set forth in § 301.7701-7(d)(2) of this chapter.
( d ) *Examples.* The following examples illustrate the rules of this section. In all examples, *A* is a U.S. citizen, *B* is a U.S. citizen, *C* is a nonresident alien, and *T* is a trust. The examples are as follows:
Example 1. Migration of domestic trust with U.S. beneficiaries. A transfers property which has a fair market value of 1000X and an adjusted basis equal to 400X to *T,* a domestic trust, for the benefit of *A*'s children who are also U.S. citizens. *B* is the trustee of *T.* On January 1, 2001, while *A* is still alive, *B* resigns as trustee and *C* becomes successor trustee under the terms of the trust. Pursuant to § 301.7701-7(d) of this chapter, *T* becomes a foreign trust. *T* has U.S. beneficiaries within the meaning of § 1.679-2 and *A* is, therefore, treated as owning *FT* under section 679. Pursuant to § 1.684-3(a), neither *A* nor *T* is required to recognize gain at the time of the migration. Section 1.684-2(e) provides rules that may require *A* to recognize gain upon a subsequent change in the status of the trust.
Example 2. Migration of domestic trust with no U.S. beneficiaries. A transfers property which has a fair market value of 1000X and an adjusted basis equal to 400X to *T,* a domestic trust for the benefit of *A*'s mother who is not a citizen or resident of the United States. *T* is not treated as owned by another person. *B* is the trustee of *T.* On January 1, 2001, while *A* is still alive, *B* resigns as trustee and *C* becomes successor trustee under the terms of the trust. Pursuant to § 301.7701-7(d) of this chapter, *T* becomes a foreign trust, *FT. FT* has no U.S. beneficiaries within the meaning of § 1.679-2 and no person is treated as owning any portion of *FT. T* is required to recognize gain of 600X on January 1, 2001. Paragraph (c) of this section provides rules with respect to an inadvertent migration of a domestic trust.
[T.D. 8956, 66 FR 37899, July 20, 2001]
EXHIBIT 10.28

                                  April 15, 2003

                                                                  (212) 838-8040

Mr. K. Tucker Andersen
61 Above All Road
Warren, CT 06754

                         New Line of Credit for $900,000
                                       and
                     Extension of Maturity Date on $500,000
                         Owed Under 2001 Line of Credit

Dear Tucker:

      This will confirm that you have opened a new line of credit for Milestone
Scientific Inc., in the aggregate amount of $900,000. Borrowings under line will
bear interest at the rate of 8% per annum and will be evidenced by a promissory
note in usual form. Monies may be drawn by Milestone under the line upon 10
days' written notice to you from either Milestone's Chief Executive Officer or
Chief Financial Officer. The line will expire and borrowings under the line and
interest thereon will be payable in cash on January 2, 2005.

      This will also confirm that you have agreed to further extend the payment
date of the $500,000 owed under the Line of Credit dated January 29, 2001, which
is not now payable in stock at Milestone's election, from December 31, 2003
until January 2, 2005.

      This letter replaces and cancels the commitment in our earlier letter
dated April 8, 2003 which you countersigned.

      If this conforms with your understanding with Milestone please countersign
and return the copy of this letter.

                                                     Very truly yours


                                                     Stephen A. Zelnick

Accepted and agreed to
this 15th day of April, 2003


/s/ K. Tucker Andersen
----------------------------
K. Tucker Andersen
----

----

**EXHIBIT          31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS***

| Date:                    November 14, 2007  |   | By:/s/                    Ronald M. Diner               |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|                                             |   | Ronald                    M. Diner                      |
|                                             |   | President                                               |
|                                             |   | Raymond                    James Tax Credit Funds, Inc. |
|                                             |   | (the                    Managing General Partner)       |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 69 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 69

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
   Providing for the reappointment of Homer Alfred Neal as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 
43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian 
Institution, in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by 
reason of the expiration of the term of Homer Alfred Neal of Michigan 
on December 6, 1995, is filled by the reappointment of the incumbent 
for a term of six years, effective December 7, 1995.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 7, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 69

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

   Providing for the reappointment of Homer Alfred Neal as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.
```
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.6233(b)-1 Interest and penalties with respect to the adjustment year return. ( a ) *Interest and penalties with respect to failure to pay imputed underpayment on the date prescribed.* In the case of any failure to pay an imputed underpayment on the date prescribed for such payment (as described in § 301.6232-1(b)), a partnership is liable for— ( 1 ) Interest as determined under paragraph (c) of this section; and
( 2 ) Any penalty, addition to tax, or additional amount as determined under paragraph (d) of this section.
( b ) *Imputed underpayments to which this section applies.* This section applies to the portion of an imputed underpayment determined by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) under section 6225(a)(1), or an imputed underpayment resulting from adjustments requested by a partnership in an administrative adjustment request under section 6227, that is not paid by the date prescribed for payment under § 301.6232-1(b).
( c ) *Interest.* Interest determined under this paragraph (c) is the interest that would be imposed under chapter 67 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) by treating any unpaid amount of the imputed underpayment as an underpayment of tax imposed for the adjustment year (as defined in § 301.6241-1(a)(1)). The interest under this paragraph (c) begins on the date prescribed for payment (as described in § 301.6232-1(b)) and ends on the date payment of the imputed underpayment is made.
( d ) *Penalties.* If a partnership fails to pay an imputed underpayment by the date prescribed for payment (as described in § 301.6232-1(b)), section 6651(a)(2) applies to such failure, and any unpaid amount of the imputed underpayment is treated as if it were an underpayment of tax for purposes of part II of subchapter A of chapter 68 of the Code. For purposes of this section, the penalty under 6651(a)(2) is applied by treating the unpaid amount of the imputed underpayment as the unpaid amount shown as tax on a return required under subchapter A of chapter 61 of the Code.
( e ) *Applicability date* — ( 1 ) *In general.* Except as provided in paragraph (e)(2) of this section, this section applies to partnership taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, and ending after August 12, 2018.
( 2 ) *Election under § 301.9100-22 in effect.* This section applies to any partnership taxable year beginning after November 2, 2015, and before January 1, 2018, for which a valid election under § 301.9100-22 is in effect.
[T.D. 9844, 84 FR 6565, Feb. 27, 2019]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Supported scaffolding safetytips [electronic resource] = Andiamo de soporte consejos de seguridad.**
 
English | Espanol
 
SuDoc Number:L 35.2:SCA 2/2
Item Number:0765 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000624996
 
December 28, 2017
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Troy Radcliffe, Appellant.

[808 NYS2d 22]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Dominic Massaro, J.), rendered July 10, 2003, as amended September 25, 2003, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and assault in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 15 years and 7 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion in all respects. When the victim identified defendant’s photo from an array, this provided the police with probable cause to arrest defendant *(see People v Palacio,*121 AD2d 282, 283 [1986], *lv denied*68 NY2d 916 [1986]). We reject defendant’s argument that this identification was insufficiently reliable to establish probable cause. Although at the time of the identification the victim was hospitalized and under the influence of medication, the detective testified that the victim was lucid and that he unequivocally identified defendant’s photo *(cf. People v Gloster,*175 AD2d 258, 262 [1991], *lv denied*78 NY2d 1011 [1991]). The victim’s subsequent lineup identification was not unduly suggestive. The record establishes that any physical disparities between defendant and the other lineup participants were minimal and did not draw undue attention to defendant *(see People v Chipp,*75 NY2d 327, 336 [1990], *cert denied*498 US 833 [1990]). The lineup identification was not rendered infirm because the *302victim had seen a composite sketch that bore a resemblance to defendant.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490 [1987]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning identification and credibility.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Saxe, J.P., Marlow, Ellerin, Gonzalez and McGuire, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM
     10-Q OF BERLITZ INTERNATIONAL, INC. FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED
     SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         39,397
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  55,257
<ALLOWANCES>                                   4,067
<INVENTORY>                                    10,134
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               124,103
<PP&E>                                         76,975
<DEPRECIATION>                                 27,711
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 688,849
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          117,664
<BONDS>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       1,005
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     327,015
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   688,849
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               360,667
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  216,307
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               13,767
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             7,979
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                6,219
<INCOME-TAX>                                   7,638
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,747)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,747)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.18)



</TABLE>