alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(logo) pwc

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

 

To the Board of Directors andshareholders of CoreLogic, Inc.:

 

We have examinedmanagement’s assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessmentof Compliance, that CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc. (the"Company"), a subsidiary of CoreLogic, Inc. complied with theservicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and ExchangeCommission's Regulation AB for all loans for commercial mortgage loanoutsourcing customers for which the Company served as the commercial taxservice provider (the "Platform"), as of December 31, 2016 and forthe year then ended, only including 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(2)(v),1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and1122(d)(4)(xiii), which the Company has determined are applicable to theservicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Managementis responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Ourresponsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on ourexamination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicableservicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considerednecessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selectedservicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether theCompany performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicableservicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected servicingactivities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errorsthat may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may haveaffected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company duringthe period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides areasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legaldetermination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementionedapplicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016for all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which theCompany served as the commercial tax service provider is fairly stated, in allmaterial respects.

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers

 

February 6, 2017

 

 

*PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 1800, Dallas TX 75201-2997*

*T: 214-746-6500, F: 214-712-6660,*www.pwc.com
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID J. PEDERSEN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

TRACY SCHNEIDER, Correctional

Manager,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 22

- 35012

D.C. No. 3:21

- cv

- 05121

- RSM

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

Ricardo S. Martinez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 18, 2023 * *

Before: GRABER, PAEZ, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

David J. Pedersen

, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se the district

cour t’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging a First

Amendment violation in connection with the rejection of outgoing mail . We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court ’ s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JAN 27 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 22

- 35012

decision on cross

- motions for summary judgment. JL Beverage Co., LLC v. Jim

Beam Brands Co. , 828 F.3d 1098, 1104 (9th Cir. 2016). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment for defendant because

Pedersen failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether the rejected

outgoing letter was not obscene or whether the prison’s policy regulating outgoing

mail did not further a substantial government interest

. S ee Procunier v. Martinez

,

416 U.S. 396, 413 (1974), overruled on other grounds by Thornburgh v. Abbott

,

490 U.S. 401 (1989) ( explaining that the F irst A mendment is not violated by

regulation of outgoing prisoner mail which furthers a substantial governm ent

interest and is no greater than necessary to protect that interest ); Miller v.

California

, 413 U.S. 15, 23

- 2 6 (1973 ) ( setting forth test for determining obscene

material unprotected by the First Amendment )

.

AFFIRMED.
FIL ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTHCI RCUI T MAY 1, 2009 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 0 8- 14 61 4 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock etNo. 0 7- 00 03 6- CR-WLS-7 UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll ee, ve rs us JUAN GABRIEL MALDONADO, a.k .a Ju anGabr ia l M al do na do , Defen da nt -Ap pe ll an t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S tate s Di st ric t Co urt fo r th e Mi dd le Dis tri ctof Ge or gi a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ (Ma y 1, 2 00 9) Befo re BLACK, BARKETT an d HULL, Cir cu itJu dg es PER CURI AM: Ri ckCo ll um , ret ai ne d c ou ns el forJu anGabr ie l M al do na do inth is di rect cri m in al ap pe al , has m ov edto withd raw fro m furth er re pr es en ta ti onof t heap pe ll an t an d fi le d abri ef p ur su an t t o An de rs v. Ca li fo rn ia , 38 6 U.S. 7 38 , 87 S.Ct .

13 96 , 18 L.Ed.2d49 3 (1 96 7) . Our i nd ep en de ntrev ie w of the en ti re re co rdrev eal s th atco un se l’s as se ss m en t o f th e rel at iv e m eri t o f th e ap pe al is co rrec t. Bec au se in de pe nd en t ex am in at io n o f th e en ti re rec or d re ve al s n o arg uabl e is su es of m eri t, co un se l’s m ot io n t o wi th dr aw is GRANTED , andMal do na do ’s con vi ct io n and se nt en ce ar e AFFIRMED . Mal do na do ’s m ot io n fo r ap po in tm en t o f co un se l o n ap pe al is DENIE D AS MOOT .

2
IA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 8

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to limit

the terms of office for Representatives and Senators in Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mrs. FOWLER (for herself, Mr. JONES, Mr. WELDON of Florida, Mr. CANADY,

Mr. DEUTSCH, Mr. GOSS, Mr. MEEHAN, Mr. SMITH of Michigan, Mr.

GANSKE, Ms. DANNER, and Mr. HANCOCK) introduced the following joint

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States to limit the terms of office for Representatives

and Senators in Congress.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the follow4 ing article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitu5 tion of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents

6 and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by
2

•HJ 8 IH

1 the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States with2 in seven years after the date of its submission for ratifica3 tion:

4 ‘‘ARTICLE —

5 ‘‘No person may serve more than four consecutive

6 terms as Representative or two consecutive terms as Sen7 ator, not counting any term that began before the adop8 tion of this article of amendment.’’.

Æ
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Henry Rangel v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-18-00273-CR

Trial court case number: CR13465 

Trial court: 355th District Court of Hood County1

Appellant, Henry Rangel, has filed a motion to extend the time to file his appellate 

brief. Appellant’s motion complies with the rules. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a), 10.5(b). 

Accordingly, we grant appellant’s motion. Appellant’s brief is due on February 21, 2020.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: ___January 16, 2020____

 

1 Pursuant to its docket equalization powers, the Texas Supreme Court transferred this appeal 

from the Court of Appeals for the Second District of Texas to this Court. See TEX. GOV’T

CODE § 73.001; Misc. Docket No. 18-9049 (Tex. Mar. 27, 2018).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PETE'S
BREWING COMPANY'S FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1996 AS SHOWN IN AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO THE
10-Q FILING
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          10,952
<SECURITIES>                                    24,287
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,915
<ALLOWANCES>                                        98
<INVENTORY>                                      5,024
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                52,160
<PP&E>                                           3,635
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  59,819
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,644
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        48,197
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,978
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    59,819
<SALES>                                         51,553
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                51,553
<CGS>                                           25,160
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,930
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,516
<INCOME-TAX>                                       839
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,677
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,677
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 99.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Covalent Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for theperiod ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jorge A. Leon, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and result of operations of the Company.

|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |   |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ JORGE A. LEON                                                               |   |   |        |
| **Jorge A. Leon****Executive Vice President and****Chief Financial Officer****November 13, 2002**                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |   |   |   |

** **
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.6315-1 Payments of estimated income tax.

The payment of any installment of the estimated income tax (see sections 6015 and 6016) shall be considered payment on account of the income tax for the taxable year for which the estimate is made. The aggregate amount of the payments of estimated tax should be entered upon the income tax return for such taxable year as payments to be applied against the tax shown on such return.
§ 40.6091-1 Place for filing returns. ( a ) *Quarterly returns.* Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, returns must be filed in accordance with the instructions applicable to the form on which the return is made.
( b ) *Hand-carried returns* — ( 1 ) *Persons other than corporations.* Returns of persons other than corporations that are filed by hand carrying must be filed with any person assigned the responsibility to receive hand-carried returns in the local Internal Revenue Service office that serves the principal place of business or legal residence of the person.
( 2 ) *Corporations.* Returns of corporations that are filed by hand carrying must be filed with any person assigned the responsibility to receive hand-carried returns in the local Internal Revenue Service office that serves the principal place of business or principal office or agency of the corporation.
( c ) *Monthly and semimonthly returns.* Monthly and semimonthly returns required under § 40.6011(a)-1(b) must be filed in accordance with the forms and instructions, or other published guidance.
[T.D. 8442, 57 FR 48177, Oct. 22, 1992, as amended by T.D. 8968, 66 FR 41776, Aug. 9, 2001; T.D. 9158, 69 FR 55744, Sept. 16, 2004; T.D. 9602, 77 FR 72728, Dec. 6, 2012]
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Properties III
L.P. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, David Salzman, Chief Executive Officer of Richman Housing Credits
Inc., general partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties III L.P., general partner
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to
(S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.



/s/ David Salzman
-----------------------------
by: David Salzman
Chief Executive Officer of Richman
Housing Credits Inc., general partner of
Richman Tax Credit Properties III L.P.,
general partner of the Company
February 13, 2003
IA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 118

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1996, and for

other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 10, 1995

Mr. OBEY introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Appropriations

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

1996, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 106(c) of Public Law 104–31 (109 Stat.

4 280) is amended by striking ‘‘November 13, 1995’’ and

5 inserting ‘‘December 13, 1995’’.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 154 (Wednesday, August 12, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 40602]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19320]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Infectious Diseases Clinical 
Studies and Trails.
    Date: September 16, 2009.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: Crowne Plaza Hotel--Silver Spring, 8777 Georgia Avenue, 
Silver Spring, MD 20910.
    Contact Person: Edward W. Schroder, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, NIAID, NIH, Room 2156, 6700-B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-496-2550.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 5, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-19320 Filed 8-11-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 77 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 77

      Concerning the Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 15, 1995

 Mr. Lipinski submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
          referred to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
      Concerning the Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing.
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),
SECTION 1. FOURTH WORLD CONFERENCE ON WOMEN IN BEIJING.

    It is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) the Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing, China, 
        should promote an authentic women's perspective on issues of 
        equality, peace, and development; and
            (2) if the United States sends a delegation to the 
        Conference, the delegation should--
                    (A) in accordance with the United Nations Universal 
                Declaration of Human Rights, ensure that ``motherhood 
                [is] entitled to special care and assistance.'';
                    (B) in accordance with the Universal Declaration of 
                Human Rights, uphold the family as ``the natural and 
                fundamental group unit of society'' and therefore 
                ``entitled to protection by society and the state'';
                    (C) oppose female feticide;
                    (D) in accordance with the commonly used and 
                generally accepted usage of the word, gender refers to 
                woman and man as the two sexes of the human being; and
                    (E) in accordance with the United Nations 
                Declaration of Human Rights uphold ``the freedom of 
                conscience and religion [and the] manifestation [of] 
                one's religion or belief in practice'' with particular 
                regard to those who provide health care services.
                                 <all>
```
§ 305.7701-1 Definition of Indian tribal government. ( a ) *Definition.* A governing body of a tribe, band, pueblo, community, village, or group of native American Indians, or Alaska Natives, qualifies as an Indian tribal government upon determination by the Internal Revenue Service that the governing body exercises governmental functions. Designation of a governing body as an Indian tribal government will be by revenue procedure. If a governing body is not currently designated by the applicable revenue procedure as an Indian tribal government, and such governing body believes that it qualifies for such designation, the governing body may apply for a ruling from Internal Revenue Service. In order to qualify as an Indian tribal government, for purposes of section 7701(a)(40) and this section, such governing body must receive a favorable ruling from the Internal Revenue Service. The request for a ruling shall be made in accordance with all applicable procedural rules set forth in the Statement of Procedural Rules (26 CFR part 601) and any applicable revenue procedures relating to the submission of ruling requests. The request shall be submitted to the Internal Revenue Service, Associate Chief Counsel (Technical), Attention: CC:IND:S, room 6545, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, D.C. 20224.
( b ) *Effective date.* The provisions of this section are effective after December 31, 1982.