alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 58 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 58

Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution of the United 
                                States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 19, 1995

Mr. Hoke introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution of the United 
                                States.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Congress may not increase the limit on the debt of the 
United States held by the public without the approval of three-fifths 
of the whole number of each House of Congress.
    ``Section 2. No bill to increase tax revenue shall become law 
unless approved by three-fifths of the whole number of each House of 
Congress.
    ``Section 3. Congress may waive the provisions of this Article for 
any fiscal year in which a declaration of war is in effect. The 
provisions of this Article may be waived for any fiscal year in which 
the United States faces an imminent and serious military threat to 
national security and is so declared by a joint resolution, adopted by 
a majority of the whole number of each House, which becomes law.
    ``Section 4. Congress shall enforce and implement this Article by 
appropriate legislation.
    ``Section 5. This Article shall take effect for the fiscal year 
2002 or for the second fiscal year beginning after its ratification, 
whichever is later.''.
                                 <all>
```
IV

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 54

Expressing the sense of the Congress relating to diplomatic recognition of

the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 3, 1995

Mr. SOLOMON (for himself, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. ZIMMER, and Mrs. MALONEY)

submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress relating to diplomatic

recognition of the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.

Whereas the United States has strong and enduring economic, political, and strategic ties with the Hellenic Republic of Greece;

Whereas Greece has been a strategic ally of the United States

in the Eastern Mediterranean during every major conflict

in the 20th century;

Whereas historical and archaeological evidence demonstrates

that the ancient Macedonians were Greek;

Whereas Macedonia is a Greek name that has designated the

northern area of Greece for over 2,000 years;
2

•HCON 54 IH

Whereas in 1944, the United States opposed the changing of

the name of the Skopje region of Yugoslavia by Marshall

Tito from Vardar Banovina to Macedonia as part of a

campaign to gain control of the Greek province of Macedonia and the major port city of Salonika;

Whereas the regime in Skopje has persisted in inflaming tensions between it and Greece through a sustained propaganda campaign and the continued use of ancient Greek

symbols, including the Star of Vergina, in its flag;

Whereas the Skopje regime has refused to remove paragraph

(49) from its constitution, a reference to the 1944 declaration by the then communist regime calling for the

‘‘unification’’ of neighboring territories in Greece and

Bulgaria with the ‘‘Macedonian Republic’’;

Whereas Greece has no claim on the territory of the Former

Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and has repeatedly

reaffirmed the inviolability of all borders in the area in

general and among the two countries in particular; and

Whereas it is in the best interest of the United States to oppose any expansionist or irredentist policies in order to

promote peace and stability in the area: Now, therefore,

be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 President—

4 (1) should not have granted diplomatic recogni5 tion to the Skopje regime that insists on using the

6 Greek name ‘‘Macedonia’’ in the name of its coun-
3

•HCON 54 IH

1 try, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia;

2 and

3 (2) should reconsider this decision and with4 draw diplomatic recognition and any consideration of

5 financial assistance to the Skopje regime until such

6 time as the Skopje regime—

7 (A) renounces its use of the name ‘‘Mac8 edonia’’ in the name of its country;

9 (B) removes objectionable language in

10 paragraph (49) of its constitution;

11 (C) removes symbols which imply terri12 torial expansion, such as the Star of Vergina in

13 its flag;

14 (D) ceases propaganda against Greece; and

15 (E) adheres fully to the norms and prin16 ciples of the Conference on Security and Co17 operation in Europe.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>            5

<LEGEND>

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
ACG HOLDINGS, INC.'S UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>

<CIK>                                               0000856710
<NAME>                                              ACG HOLDINGS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                        1,000
<CURRENCY>                                          U.S. DOLLARS

       
<S> <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                      APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                        JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1
<CASH>                                              0
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       57,059
<ALLOWANCES>                                        6,210
<INVENTORY>                                         11,068
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    65,642
<PP&E>                                              242,525
<DEPRECIATION>                                      77,850
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      329,957
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               80,659
<BONDS>                                             185,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            1
<OTHER-SE>                                          (81,312)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        329,957
<SALES>                                             126,128
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    126,128
<CGS>                                               109,100
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       109,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    183
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    529
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  9,256
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (4,413)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        537
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (4,950)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (4,950)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0
        

</TABLE>
§ 26.6694-4 Extension of period of collection when preparer pays 15 percent of a penalty for understatement of taxpayer's liability and certain other procedural matters. ( a ) *In general.* For rules relating to the extension of period of collection when a tax return preparer who prepared a return or claim for refund for generation-skipping transfer tax under chapter 13 of subtitle B of the Internal Revenue Code pays 15 percent of a penalty for understatement of taxpayer's liability, and procedural matters relating to the investigation, assessment and collection of the penalties under section 6694(a) and (b), the rules under § 1.6694-4 of this chapter will apply.
( b ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section is applicable to returns and claims for refund filed, and advice provided, after December 31, 2008.
[T.D. 9436, 73 FR 78453, Dec. 22, 2008]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 116 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                                                     December 13, 1995.
      Resolved, That the resolution from the House of Representatives 
(H. Con. Res. 116) entitled ``Concurrent resolution directing the 
Secretary of the Senate to make technical corrections in the enrollment 
of S. 1060'', do pass with the following

                               AMENDMENT:

    Page 2, after line 10 insert:
            (7) In section 18, strike ``contract, loan, or any other 
        form'' and insert ``or loan''.
            (8) In section 12(b)(1), strike ``7'' and insert ``6''.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
104th CONGRESS

  1st Session 

                            H. CON. RES. 116

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENT
```
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 8

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution relating to a Federal balanced

budget.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 21 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 1993

Mr. THURMOND (for himself, Mr. DECONCINI, and Mr. SIMPSON) introduced

the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution relating to a

Federal balanced budget.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution if ratified

7 by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States

8 within seven years after its submission to the States for

9 ratification:
2

SJ 8 IS

1 ‘‘ARTICLE—

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. Total outlays of the United States for

3 any fiscal year shall not exceed total receipts to the United

4 States for that year, unless three-fifths of the whole num5 ber of both Houses of Congress shall provide for a specific

6 excess of outlays over receipts.

7 ‘‘SECTION 2. Any bill for raising taxes shall become

8 law only if approved by a majority of the whole number

9 of both Houses of Congress by rollcall vote.

10 ‘‘SECTION 3. The Congress may waive the provisions

11 of this article for any fiscal year in which a declaration

12 of war is in effect.

13 ‘‘SECTION 4. Total receipts shall include all receipts

14 of the United States except those derived from borrowing.

15 Total outlays shall include all outlays of the United States

16 except for those for repayment of debt principal.

17 ‘‘SECTION 5. This article shall take effect beginning

18 with fiscal year 1998 or with the second fiscal year begin19 ning after the ratification, whichever is later.’’.

Æ
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 229

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 28, 1996

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Directing the Secretary of the Senate to make corrections

in the enrollment of S. 1004.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That, in the enrollment of the bill S. 1004,

3 the Secretary of the Senate shall make the following cor4 rections:

5 (1) In section 1106(c), in the text added to sec6 tion 5 of the Act of January 2, 1951—
2

HCON 229 RDS

1 (A) strike ‘‘This section does not prohibit,

2 nor may any State make’’ and insert in lieu

3 thereof ‘‘With respect to a vessel operating in

4 Alaska, this section does not prohibit, nor may

5 the State of Alaska make’’;

6 (B) strike ‘‘except that a State may’’ and

7 insert in lieu thereof ‘‘except that such State

8 may’’; and

9 (C) strike paragraph (2) and insert in lieu

10 thereof the following:

11 ‘‘(2) A voyage referred to in paragraph (1) is a voy12 age that—

13 ‘‘(A) includes a stop in Canada or in a State

14 other than the State of Alaska;

15 ‘‘(B) includes stops in at least 2 different ports

16 situated in the State of Alaska; and

17 ‘‘(C) is of at least 60 hours duration.’’.

18 (2) In section 1113(d), in the text added to sec19 tion 12106 of title 46, United States Code, in sub20 section (e)(1)(E) strike ‘‘section 12102’’ and insert

21 in lieu thereof ‘‘this section’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 28,

1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>                                            5
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           3,904
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  230,598
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     21,718
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               257,384
<PP&E>                                       1,006,422
<DEPRECIATION>                               (272,011)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,046,237
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          268,625
<BONDS>                                        376,314
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              416
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,227
<OTHER-SE>                                     353,852
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,046,237
<SALES>                                        563,089
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               565,152
<CGS>                                          501,143
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  501,143
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                34,807
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,218
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,984
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,378
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,606
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,606
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30


</TABLE>
Letter from Lois E. Quam



 Exhibit 10(z) 
 

 
 November 9, 2006 
 Mr. Richard T. Burke 
 Chairman of the Board of Directors 
 UnitedHealth Group Incorporated 
 9900 Bren Road East 
 Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343 
 Dear Mr. Burke: 
 As I stated in my letter to you earlier this week, I believe that business leaders have a special responsibility to
society and to shareholders. For that reason, I would like to voluntarily relinquish to UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (“Company”) the value of the stock options granted to me by the Company that were suspended in October 1999 and
reinstituted in August 2000.1 
 As you know, on November 6, 2006, I entered into a letter agreement (“November 6 Agreement”) with the Company providing for the repricing of certain options granted to me by the Company during the years 1994 through 2002. In
doing so, I explained that, although I was not personally involved in the implementation of the Company’s stock option program, I want to ensure that I do not receive any unintended personal benefit as a result of options granted to me by the
Company. I believe that the actions described in this letter, combined with those set forth in the November 6 Agreement, will allow me to accomplish that goal. 
 As I have stated before, I believe that the Company will be stronger because of the comprehensive changes that have and will be made as a result of this situation. In working with our talented group of executives here
in Minnesota and around the country, I am constantly reminded that our best days are yet to come. Our most important contribution is ultimately made in the improvements to health care affordability and quality that we deliver to individuals and
families. On that basis, we will build a yet greater company. 
 Very truly yours, 
  

	
	/s/ Lois E. Quam
	Lois E. Quam

 cc: Stephen J. Hemsley 


	 1
	 In particular, I wish to relinquish the value of the 56,000 options that the Company originally granted
to me on February 6, 1998. Those options were suspended in October 1999, and reinstituted in August 2000.
<Page>




                                                    [LOGO]

                    INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 8 to Registration
Statement No. 333-43799 of Fortis Benefits Insurance Company Variable Account
D of our report dated February 28, 2003, relating to the financial statements
of Fortis Benefits Insurance Company Variable Account D, appearing in such
Statement of Additional Information, which is part of such Registration
Statement, and to the reference to us under the heading "Independent Public
Accountants" in such Statement of Additional Information.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Hartford, Connecticut

April 7, 2003
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

Re:          Annual Statement of Compliance for Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. CommercialMortgage Pass Through Certificates, Series 2016-BNK2

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of November 1, 2016 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a)     A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of itsperformance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision;and

 

(b)     Tothe best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

  

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
#### In the Matter of Alice Livingston, Petitioner, v New York City Housing Authority, Respondent.

[805 NYS2d 10]

*219Determination of respondent Housing Authority, dated June 16, 2004, terminating the subject tenancy, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Lottie F. Wilkins, J], entered November 23, 2004) dismissed, without costs.

The determination is supported by substantial evidence that petitioner breached respondent’s rules and regulations by permitting dogs, possessed by her or her guests or family members, to remain unleashed on Housing Authority premises and menace and inflict injury upon other tenants. The determination is additionally supported by substantial evidence that petitioner refused to discontinue use of a faulty washing machine, which repeatedly caused damage to the apartment beneath hers. No basis exists to disturb the hearing officer’s credibility determinations *(see Matter of Berenhaus v Ward,*70 NY2d 436, 443-444 [1987]). The penalty does not shock our sense of fairness *(see Matter of Wooten v Finkle,*285 AD2d 407, 408-409 [2001]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Ellerin, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.
Order entered January 30, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01000-CV

RUSSELL D. ABEREGG, Appellant

V.

MONICA CESCHAN, Appellee

On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-12-00023

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s January 29, 2014 motion to reset submission of his appeal 

to a date after February 15, 2014 because he is constructing an amended brief. This case has 

already been submitted without oral argument on January 28, 2014. We therefore DENY

appellant’s request to extend the time for submission.

We also DENY appellant’s motion to the extent that he requests an extension of time to 

file an amended brief. Appellant filed his original brief on May 20, 2013. On May 23, 2014, we 

sent appellant a defective brief notice and instructed him to file an amended brief correcting the 

deficiencies within ten days. Appellant did not file an amended brief as instructed or seek an 

extension of time to file an amended brief. Rather, he filed a motion for remand for a hearing. 

We denied his motion for remand by order dated July 2, 2013 and informed appellant that the 
appeal would be submitted on the brief he initially filed. On August 1, 2013, appellant sought 

clarification of the July 2, 2013 order and a thirty-day extension of time to file a brief. We 

denied appellant’s request for an extension of time to file a brief by order dated August 14, 2013.

In his motion, appellant also presented additional points labeled (a) through (g) as an 

“amendment” to his brief. We will consider these points to the extent they concern arguments 

already raised in appellant’s initial brief.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 04, 2018.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, April 04, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A18D0376. THE STATE v. MICHAEL DONOVAN ROSS.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

2014C48790