alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 80 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 80

    Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in 
    approving the Closing of a Public Alley and Establishment of an 
           Easement in Square 253, S.O. 88-107, Act of 1994.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 24, 1995

Mr. Stark introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 
          to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in 
    approving the Closing of a Public Alley and Establishment of an 
           Easement in Square 253, S.O. 88-107, Act of 1994.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress hereby 
disapproves of the action of the District of Columbia Council described 
as follows: The Closing of a Public Alley and Establishment of an 
Easement in Square 253, S.O. 88-107, Act of 1994 (D.C. Act 10-395), 
approved by the District of Columbia Council on February 7, 1995, and 
transmitted to Congress pursuant to section 602(c) of the District of 
Columbia Self-Government and Governmental Reorganization Act on 
February 7, 1995.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet and statement of income and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000857264
<NAME> KRUPP GOVERNMENT INCOME TRUST
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      18,991,047
<SECURITIES>                               211,070,121<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,606,936
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,658,726<F2>
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             242,326,830
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,910,347<F3>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   234,769,786
<OTHER-SE>                                     646,697<F4>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               242,326,830
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,314,943<F5>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,971,990<F6>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              9,342,953
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          9,342,953
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 9,342,953
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .62
<FN>
<F1>Includes Participating Insured Mortgage Investments ("PIMIs") (insured
mortgages of $114,757,175 and Additional Loans of $20,749,108), Participating
Insured Mortgages ("PIMs") of $48,562,091 and Mortgage-Backed Securities
("MBS") of $27,001,747
<F2>Includes prepaid acquisition fees and expenses of $13,473,359 net of
accumulated amortization of $5,801,083 and prepaid participating servicing of
$4,491,005 net of accumulated amortization of $1,504,555
<F3>Includes deferred income on Additional Loans of $6,889,487
<F4>Unrealized gain on MBS
<F5>Represents interest income on investments in mortgages and cash
<F6>Includes $1,218,453 of amortization for prepaid fees and expenses
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 156 (Friday, August 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 41173]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19476]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Environmental Research and Education; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Advisory Committee for Environmental Research and 
Education (9487).
    Dates: September 9, 2009, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. and September 10, 2009, 
9 a.m.-1 p.m.
    Place: Stafford I, Room 1235, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Blvd., Arlington, Virginia 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Alan Tessier, National Science Foundation, Suite 
635, 4201 Wilson Blvd, Arlington, Virginia 22230. Phone 703-292-
7198.
    Minutes: May be obtained from the contact person listed above.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice, recommendations, and 
oversight concerning support for environmental research and 
education.

Agenda

September 9

Introduction of New Members.
Update on recent NSF environmental activities.
Public release of the Committee's report: Transitions and Tipping 
Points in Complex Environmental Systems.
Discussion with Dr. Arden L. Bement, NSF Director.

September 10

Discussion of Future AC/ERE activities.
Joint session with Advisory Committee for Biological Sciences.

    Dated: August 11, 2009.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-19476 Filed 8-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
(logo)Rialto

          CAPITAL

 

**2018 Annual Statement of ServicerCompliance (Item 1123)**

** **

Poolingand Servicing Agreement (the " Pooling and Servicing Agreement")dated as of July 1, 2016 by and among SG Commercial Mortgage Securities, LLC asDepositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, RialtoCapital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC asOperating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer, 

WellsFargo Bank, National Association as Certificate Administrator, and WilmingtonTrust, National Association as Trustee relating to the SG Commercial MortgageSecurities Trust 2016- C5, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,Series 2016-CS **(SGCMS 2016-CS)**

 

Theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, asspecial servicer (the "Special Servicer") herein certifies to thefollowing:

 

1.All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under thePooling and Servicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the SpecialServicer.

 

2. Areview of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer forthe period of January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 (the "ReportingPeriod") in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has beenconducted under my supervision.

 

3. Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and ServicingAgreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there hasbeen a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, eachfailure and the nature and status thereof has been specifically identifiedherein.

I

 

Certifiedby: /s/ Adam Singer

AdamSinger, Managing Director

 

Date:March 1, 2019
#### § 1.662(c)-3 Termination of existence of other beneficiaries.

If the existence of a beneficiary which is not an individual terminates, the amount to be included under section 662(a) in its gross income for the last taxable year is computed with reference to §§ 1.662(c)-1 and 1.662(c)-2 as if the beneficiary were a deceased individual, except that income required to be distributed prior to the termination but actually distributed to the beneficiary's successor in interest is included in the beneficiary's income for its last taxable year.
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta name="pdf:PDFVersion" content="1.2">
<meta name="xmp:CreatorTool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="pdf:hasXFA" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:modify_annotations" content="true">
<meta name="dc:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="dcterms:created" content="1998-09-11T04:22:38Z">
<meta name="dcterms:modified" content="1998-09-11T04:22:39Z">
<meta name="dc:format" content="application/pdf; version=1.2">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator_tool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="access_permission:fill_in_form" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:modified" content="1998-09-11T04:22:39Z">
<meta name="pdf:hasCollection" content="false">
<meta name="pdf:encrypted" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Length" content="16696">
<meta name="pdf:hasMarkedContent" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Type" content="application/pdf">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print_faithful" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="pdf:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_for_accessibility" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:assemble_document" content="true">
<meta name="xmpTPg:NPages" content="1">
<meta name="pdf:hasXMP" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_content" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print" content="true">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser">
<meta name="access_permission:can_modify" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:created" content="1998-09-11T04:22:38Z">
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div class="page"><p></p>
<p>OPINION I- 0~6327 WAS NEVER ISSUED OR 
</p>
<p>WAS WITHDRAWN. </p>
<p></p>
</div>
</body></html>
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Re:          Annual Statement of Compliance for Hilton USA Trust 2016-HHV CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-HHV

 

Per the Trust and ServicingAgreement dated as of November 28, 2016 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a) A review of WellsFargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
#### In the Matter of Kenneth D. Sisk, an Attorney, Respondent. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner.

[804 NYS2d 137]

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1986. He maintained an office for the practice of law in Virginia, where he was admitted in 1978.

By order of revocation entered upon respondent’s consent, effective August 31, 2005, the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board revoked respondent’s license to practice law. In his consenting affidavit, respondent admitted to twice appearing on behalf of a client in federal court in Virginia while he was suspended from practice in that state for failure to comply with continuing legal education requirements. He also made apparently misleading statements to the court regarding his status. Respondent also admitted that the Virginia bar was aware of allegations that he had allegedly threatened to burn down a house, *916which resulted in the issuance of a protective order, and that he was allegedly involved in separate incidents of the unauthorized taking of certain personal property.

Petitioner moves for an order imposing reciprocal discipline *(see*22 NYCRR 806.19). Respondent has not appeared in response to the motion. We grant the motion and further conclude that respondent should be reciprocally disbarred *(see e.g. Matter of Weiss,*261 AD2d 708 [1999]).

Mercure, J.E, Crew III, Peters, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that petitioner’s motion is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is disbarred, and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys of the State of New York, effective immediately; and it is further ordered that respondent is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; respondent is forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority; or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice with relation thereto; and it is further ordered that respondent shall comply with the provisions of this Court’s rules regulating the conduct of disbarred attorneys *(see*22 NYCRR 806.9).
### /)Oj-05;1- 

# 1116-17/{ 

# Manistee CountyBlackerAirportAuthority

2323 AirportRoad •Manistee, Michigan49660•('231 l723-4351 May16th, 2014 Kevin Schlemmer Chief, Essential Air Service Division, X-53 Office ofAviation Analysis Department ofTransportation 

### 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington, D.C. 20590 Dear Mr. Schlemmer, .........i

: '! 

### ,,.
."-·····"'····
On behalf ofthe Manistee Blacker Airport Authority I as Chairman, am inquiring as to the status of Grant Agreements between the Airport Authority and the US Department of Transportation. These Grant Agreements provide for the essential air service at Manistee through the Alternate Essential Air Service Program. ···, .. .)

I am requesting information on the status ofAddendum #3 to the Grant Agreement entered into by the Parties on May 3, 2012. This agreement provides forthe current air service at Manistee underthe Alternate Essential Air Service Program. The addendum extends the end date ofthe current Grant Agreement to July 25th, 2014. In addition the Airport Authority submitted a·proposal for a new four year Grant Agreement to 

### DOT on April10, 2014. Our expectation is that a new four year agreement will be in place by July 25th in orderto avoid an interruption in air service at Manistee. Timely action on our requests is necessary to prevent harm to the community that a lapse in service would cause. Underthe standard Essential Air Service program, the importance of uninterrupted service is a priority, to the point that air carriers are held-in until replacement service is obtained. Although we are operating underthe Alternate Essential Air Service Program, the importance of uninterrupted air service is equally essential. We are available for any request you may have to help expedite completion ofthe new contract. In the mean time we look forvvard to a fully executed copy ofAddendum #3 (extension). Ifthere is anything you need please let ourAirport Director Barry Lind know. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. 

# Since?ViJdu£2--

PaulD. Schulert ChairmanManistee BlackerAirport Authority Cc: Sen. Carl Levin Sen. Debbie Stabenow Rep. Dan**~enishek** 

### M.D. Gov. RickSnyder
#### § 41.0-1 Introduction.

The regulations in this part are designated “Highway Use Tax Regulations.” The regulations in this part relate to the tax on the use of certain highway vehicles imposed by section 4481 and to certain associated administrative provisions.

[T.D. 8879, 65 FR 17153, Mar. 31, 2000]
Exhibit 32

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,
United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 (the Form 10-Q), of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 4, 2011



By:

/s/ William J. DoyleWilliam J. DoylePresident and Chief Executive Officer


Date: November 4, 2011



By:

/s/ Wayne R. BrownleeWayne R. BrownleeExecutive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of
Regulation S-K, section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
www.gpo.gov

### §286e–1b. Increase in quota of United States; authorization of appropriations

(a) The United States Governor of the Fund is authorized to consent to an increase of $1,035,000,000 in the quota of the United States in the Fund.

(b) In order to pay the increase in the United States subscription to the Fund provided for in this section, there is hereby authorized to be appropriated $1,035,000,000, to remain available until expended.

(July 31, 1945, ch. 339, §20, as added Pub. L. 89–31, June 2, 1965, 79 Stat. 119.)
§ 31.3406(b)(4)-1 Exemption for certain minimal payments. ( a ) *In general.* A payor of reportable interest or dividends (as described in section 3406(b)(2)) or of royalties (as described in section 3406(b)(3)(E)) may elect not to withhold from a payment that does not exceed $10 and that on an annualized basis does not exceed $10 (see paragraph (c) of this section). A broker or barter exchange may elect not to withhold on gross proceeds of $10 or less without regard to the annualization requirement. See § 31.6051-4 for the requirement to furnish a statement to the payee if tax is withheld under section 3406.
( b ) *Manner of making the election.* The election not to withhold from payments that do not exceed $10 can be made only for payments described in paragraph (a) of this section. The election may be made on a payment-by-payment basis.
( c ) *How to annualize* — ( 1 ) *In general.* To annualize a reportable interest payment, dividend payment, or royalty payment, a payor must calculate what the amount of the payment would be if it were paid for a 1-year period (instead of the period for which it actually is paid). The annualized amount is determined by dividing the amount of the payment by the number of days in the period for which it is being paid and then multiplying that result by the number of days in the year. If the annualized amount is $10 or less, the payor may elect not to withhold on that payment regardless of whether more than $10 may be or has been paid to the payee in other reportable payments during the calendar year. Conversely, if the annualized amount is more than $10, withholding applies even if $10 or less is actually paid to the payee during the calendar year. For purposes of computing the annualized amount, the payor may assume that February always consists of 28 days and that the year always consists of 360 days. For amounts that are deposited with a payor in a new account or certificate between the dates on which the payor customarily pays or credits interest, the payor may assume that the period for which the interest is paid is the payor's customary period for paying or crediting interest.
( 2 ) *Special aggregation rule for reportable interest and dividends.* If a payor maintains records that reflect multiple holdings of one payee and the payor makes an aggregate payment of reportable interest or dividends (as defined in section 3406(b)(2)) with respect to those multiple holdings (such as a dividend check that reflects payment on all stock owned by the payee), the payor must annualize the aggregate payment.
( d ) *Exception for window transactions and original issue discount.* A payor is not required to annualize payments made in window transactions (as defined in § 31.3406(b)(2)-3(b)) or payments of original issue discount. With respect to a window transaction, however, the payor is required to aggregate all payments made in the same transaction (e.g., payments made with respect to coupons or obligations presented for payment at the same time as described in § 1.6049-4(e)(4) of this chapter).
[T.D. 8637, 60 FR 66119, Dec. 21, 1995]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Hugo Flores, Appellant.

[803 NYS2d 85]

*195Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel P. FitzGerald, J.), rendered February 7, 2002, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 25 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s argument that the evidence was legally insufficient to support his conviction for depraved indifference murder because his actions established an intentional murder is unpreserved. In his motion for a trial order of dismissal, defense counsel stated: “I ask for a trial order of dismissal, that the People have not proved that defendant acted under circumstances evincing a depraved indifference to human life.” Thus, defendant did not alert the court to the instant argument, that his conduct was intentional, not reckless *(see People v Gray,*86 NY2d 10 [1995]; *People v Morrison,*17 AD3d 272 [2005]; *People v Rivera,*15 AD3d 247, 248 [2005], *lv denied*5 NY3d 768 [2005]). It is also noteworthy that defendant requested that the court charge the jury with the lesser included offense of second-degree manslaughter, essentially conceding that there was a reasonable view of the evidence that would support a finding that defendant acted recklessly, rather than with intent to kill *(see People v Sanchez,*98 NY2d 373, 378 [2002]). Accordingly, we decline to review the claim. Were we to do so, we would find that the jury could have reasonably concluded, particularly if it credited portions of defendant’s statement, that he lacked homicidal intent, but acted under circumstances evincing a depraved indifference to human life *(id.).*

The court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress his statements to police. The hearing evidence established that defendant, as did other of his fellow employees, voluntarily accompanied police to the station house, was fully cooperative, was not handcuffed, was left alone without supervision, was questioned in a manner that was investigatory rather than accusatory, and was neither a suspect nor was he treated like one. Thus, a reasonable person in defendant’s position would not have believed that the interrogation was custodial *(see e.g. People v Barrow,*284 AD2d 145 [2001], *lv denied*96 NY2d 916 [2001]; *196
      *People v Collazo,*216 AD2d 98 [1995], *lv denied*86 NY2d 780 [1995]).

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

Defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them as a basis for reversal. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Ellerin, Gonzalez and McGuire, JJ.