Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 153 / Tuesday, August 11, 2009 / Notices 40165 

1Baosteel consists of the following five entities: 

Baosteel Group Corporation, Shanghai Baosteel 

International Economic & Trading Co., Ltd., 

Shanghai Baosteel Group Corporation, Baosteel 

Group International Trade Corp., and Baoshan Iron 

and Steel Co., Ltd. 

2As noted above, Baosteel consists of the five 

entities listed in footnote 1. 

approval of this information collection; 

they also will become a matter of public 

record. 

Dated: August 4, 2009. 

Susan K. Fawcett, 

Records Officer, USPTO, Office of the Chief 

Information Officer, Administrative 

Management Group. 

[FR Doc. E9–19179 Filed 8–10–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–16–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Patent and Trademark Office 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request 

The United States Patent and 

Trademark Office (USPTO) will submit 

to the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for clearance the following 

proposal for collection of information 

under the provisions of the Paperwork 

Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). 

Agency: United States Patent and 

Trademark Office (USPTO). 

Title: Customer Panel Quality Survey. 

Form Number(s): None. 

Agency Approval Number: 0651– 

0057. 

Type of Request: Revision of a 

currently approved collection. 

Burden: 406 hours. 

Number of Respondents: 2,386 

responses. 

Avg. Hours per Response: The USPTO 

estimates that it takes the public 

approximately 10 minutes (0.17 hours) 

to complete either the paper or the 

online survey. This includes the time to 

gather the necessary information, 

respond to the survey, and submit it to 

the USPTO. 

Needs and Uses: Individuals who 

work at firms that file more than six 

patent applications a year use the 

Customer Panel Quality Survey to 

provide the USPTO with their 

perceptions of examination quality. The 

USPTO uses the feedback gathered from 

the survey to assist them in targeting 

key areas for examination quality 

improvement and to identify important 

areas for examiner training. 

Affected Public: Individuals or 

households; business or other for profit; 

and not-for-profit institutions. 

Frequency: Semi-annually. 

Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary. 

OMB Desk Officer: Nicholas A. Fraser, 

e-mail: 

Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov. 

Once submitted, the request will be 

publically available in electronic format 

through the Information Collection 

Review page at http://www.reginfo.gov. 

Paper copies can be obtained by: 

* E-mail: Susan.Fawcett@uspto.gov. 

Include ‘‘0651–0057 Customer Panel 

Quality Survey copy request’’ in the 

subject line of the message. 

* Fax: 571–273–0112, marked to the 

attention of Susan K. Fawcett. 

* Mail: Susan K. Fawcett, Records 

Officer, Office of the Chief Information 

Officer, Administrative Management 

Group, U.S. Patent and Trademark 

Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 

22313–1450. 

Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collection should be sent on 

or before September 10, 2009 to 

Nicholas A. Fraser, OMB Desk Officer, 

via e-mail at Nicholas_A._

Fraser@omb.eop.gov or by fax to 202– 

395–5167, marked to the attention of 

Nicholas A. Fraser. 

Dated: August 4, 2009. 

Susan K. Fawcett, 

Records Officer, USPTO, Office of the Chief 

Information Officer, Administrative 

Management Group. 

[FR Doc. E9–19177 Filed 8–10–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–16–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–865] 

Certain Hot–Rolled Carbon Steel Flat 

Products from the People’s Republic 

of China: Final Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 11, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni 

Dach or Paul Walker, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 9, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–1655 and (202) 

482–0413, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On November 3, 2008, the Department 

of Commerce (‘‘Department’’) published 

a notice of opportunity to request an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain hot– 

rolled carbon steel flat products from 

the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) 

for the period of review (‘‘POR’’) 

November 1, 2007, through October 31, 

2008. See Antidumping or 

Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or 

Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

to Request Administrative Review, 73 

FR 65288 (November 3, 2008). On 

December 1, 2008, Nucor Corporation 

(‘‘Nucor’’), a domestic producer of 

certain hot–rolled carbon steel flat 

products, requested that the Department 

conduct an administrative review of 

Baosteel Group Corporation, Shanghai 

Baosteel International Economic & 

Trading Co., Ltd., and Baoshan Iron and 

Steel Co., Ltd. (collectively ‘‘Baosteel’’).1

On December 1, 2008, ArcelorMittal 

USA, Inc. (‘‘ArcelorMittal’’), a domestic 

producer of certain hot–rolled steel flat 

products, requested that the Department 

conduct an administrative review of 

Angang Steel Company, Ltd., Angang 

Group International Trade Corporation, 

New Iron and Steel Co., Ltd., Angang 

Group Hong Kong Co., Ltd., Anshan 

Iron & Steel Group, and all affiliated 

entities (collectively ‘‘Angang’’); and 

Shanghai Baosteel Group Corporation, 

Baosteel Group International Trade 

Corp., and Baoshan Iron and Steel Co., 

Ltd. (also collectively ‘‘Baosteel’’).2 On 

December 24, 2008, the Department 

published a notice of initiation of an 

antidumping duty administrative review 

on certain hot–rolled carbon steel flat 

products from the PRC. See Initiation of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews and Request for 

Revocation in Part, 73 FR 79055 

(December 24, 2008). On March 18, 

2009, ArcelorMittal submitted a timely 

withdrawal of its request for review of 

Baosteel and Angang. 

On June 26, 2009, we rescinded this 

review with respect to Angang based on 

ArcelorMittal’s withdrawal of their 

request for review, and preliminarily 

rescinded this review with respect to 

Baosteel based on evidence on the 

record indicating that Baosteel made no 

entries of subject merchandise into the 

United States during the POR. See 

Rescission and Preliminary Rescission 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review: Certain Hot Rolled Carbon Steel 

Flat Products from The People’s 

Republic of China, 74 FR 30525 (June 

26, 2009) (‘‘Preliminary Rescission’’). 

We invited interested parties to submit 

comments on our Preliminary 

Rescission. We did not receive any 

comments on our Preliminary 

Rescission. 


sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES