alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ruben Ocasio, Appellant.

[802 NYS2d 621]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (James A. Yates, J.), rendered August 8, 2003, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted burglary in the first degree and sexual abuse in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 18 years to life and 12 years to life, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly adjudicated defendant a persistent violent felony offender. The court fully advised defendant of his right to challenge predicate convictions on constitutional grounds *(see*CPL 400.15, 400.16), and it correctly found that there was nothing defective about defendant’s 1994 conviction *(see People v Harris,*61 NY2d 9, 15-16 [1983]). Defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved and we decline to reach them in the interest of justice. Were we to reach these claims, we would find them to be without merit. We add only that even if the court had belabored the obvious (that defendant faced consecutive sentences of up to 25 years to life if convicted after trial) before rather than after defendant pleaded guilty, defendant’s claim that the court coerced the plea would be meritless just the same. Concur—Sullivan, J.P., Ellerin, Williams, Gonzalez and McGuire, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 150 (Thursday, August 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 39380]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18787]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee 
will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public 
comment, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the 
Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, September 23, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Gilbert at 1-888-912-1227 or 
(515) 564-6638.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee 
will be held Wednesday, September 23, 2009, at 3 p.m. Eastern Time via 
telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or 
submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference 
lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Susan 
Gilbert. For more information please contact Ms. Gilbert at 1-888-912-
1227 or (515) 564-6638 or write: TAP Office, 210 Walnut Street, Stop 
5115, Des Moines, IA 50309 or contact us at the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: July 31, 2009.
Shawn F. Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E9-18787 Filed 8-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
§ 56.6001-1 Notice or regulations requiring records, statements, and special returns. ( a ) *In general.* The provisions of § 53.6001-1 shall apply to any person subject to tax under chapter 41, subtitle D, of the Code, by treating each reference to chapter 42 in § 53.6001-1 as a reference to chapter 41.
( b ) *Cross references.* See § 56.4911-6 for general information on records of lobbying expenditures. See §§ 56.4911-9(d) and 56.4911-10(f) for information that members of an affiliated group and a limited affiliated group, respectively, are to provide to other members of the group and to the Internal Revenue Service.
Exhibit 10.26



 





Exhibit 10.26




Summary of Director and Executive Officer Compensation Arrangements




     In addition to the compensation arrangements filed as other exhibits to this annual report,
EnPro Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) has the following compensation arrangements with its
directors and named executive officers.



Compensation Arrangements for Directors




     EnPro Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) has an arrangement to pay non-employee members of the
Company’s board of directors compensation for their service on the board. Each non-employee member
of the Company’s board of directors receives an annual retainer of $100,000, $75,000 of which is
paid in cash and $25,000 of which is paid in phantom shares of our common stock for the first 10
years of a director’s service on the board. The non-executive chairman of the board receives an
additional monthly fee of $15,000, the chairman of the Audit and Risk Management Committee receives
an additional annual fee of $8,000, and the chairmen of the Compensation and Human Resources
Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee each receive an annual fee of $6,000.



Compensation Arrangements for Named Executive Officers




     The Company’s chief executive officer and its four other most highly compensated executive
officers, based on 2006 base salaries and bonuses (such five officers, the “named executive
officers”), are all “at-will” employees who serve at the pleasure of the board of directors. The
board of directors sets the annual base salary for each of the named executive officers and has the
discretion to change the salary of any of the officers at any time. Effective April 1, 2007, the
annual base salaries for the named executive officers are as follows:



	 	 	 	 	 
	Named Executive Officer	 	Base Salary
	Ernest F. Schaub

	 	$	655,000	 
	William Dries

	 	$	344,000	 
	Richard L. Magee

	 	$	313,000	 
	John R. Smith

	 	$	262,000	 
	J. Milton Childress II

	 	$	237,000
§ 56.6060-1 Reporting requirements for tax return preparers. ( a ) *In general.* A person that employs one or more tax return preparers to prepare a return or claim for refund of tax under chapter 41 of subtitle D of the Internal Revenue Code, other than for the person, at any time during a return period, shall satisfy the record keeping and inspection requirements in the manner stated in § 1.6060-1 of this chapter.
( b ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section is applicable to returns and claims for refund filed after December 31, 2008.
[T.D. 9436, 73 FR 78460, Dec. 22, 2008]
39665.

#### CHESSER v. SCARBOROUGH.

Bell, Judge.

This court has no jurisdiction over the present appeal for the reason that there is no valid bill of exceptions. *530The plaintiff makes his exceptions in the bill as follows: “ . . . now1 excepts, contends and insists that the rulings made on the 29th day of January, 1962, reinstating said motion for new trial and the rulings made on the 4th day of May, 1962, the same being the final order of the court, and granting the motion for new trial, *is contrary to law.”*(Emphasis added.)

Decided September 11, 1962.

*Spears & Smith, Ted D. Spears,*for plaintiff in error.

*Lanier Randall,*contra.

At another place in the bill the plaintiff recites that she comes and assigns error on all of the rulings of the court complained of as being *“contrary to law.”*(Emphasis added.)

An assignment of error that the ruling is contrary to law is not valid where the error might have been assigned on more than one ground, as the bill of exceptions should state “wherein it is contrary to law.” Such an assignment is too indefinite to present a question for decision by the appellate court. *Vick v. Farmers ■& Merchants Bank of Coolidge, 209*Ga. 77 (70 SE2d 764); *Soman v.*Yeager, 209 Ga. 444 ( 73 SE2d 198); and *Price v. Stewart,*209 Ga. 532 (74 SE2d 458). It seems clear that the granting of the motion to reinstate the motion for new trial and the granting of the motion for new trial (which as amended had several grounds in it) could have been contrary to law on more than one ground, and, therefore, the bill of exceptions not specifying wherein the rulings of the trial court were contraiy to law, under the above authorities, presents no questions for appellate review and must be dismissed. See also *Moore v. Moore,*215 Ga. 47 (108 SE2d 704).

*Writ of error dismissed.*

*Felton, C. J., and Hall, J., concur.*
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)





The
undersigned Chief Financial Officer of First Keystone Financial, Inc. (the
“Registrant”) hereby certifies that the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.





/s/ David M. TakatsName:
      David M. TakatsTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer





Date:  May
17, 2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act has been provided to First Keystone Financial, Inc. and will be retained by
First Keystone Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
EX-10.1






EXHIBIT 10.1




2006 Bonuses & 2007 Base Salaries for Certain Executive Officers




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Name and Principal Position(s) 1	 	2006 Bonus	 	2007 Base Salary
	Scott A. McGregor
President and Chief Executive Officer
	 	$	240,000	 	 	$	650,000	 
	David A. Dull
Senior Vice President, Business Affairs, General
Counsel and Secretary
	 	 	100,000	 	 	 	300,000	 
	Bruce E. Kiddoo
Vice President, Corporate Controller and Acting Chief
Financial Officer
	 	 	100,000	 	 	 	265,000	 
	Thomas F. Laggata
Senior Vice President, Worldwide Sales
	 	 	100,000	 	 	 	285,000	 
	Vahid Manian
Senior Vice President, Global Manufacturing Operations
	 	 	100,000	 	 	 	300,000	 






1 The Compensation Committee did not establish
the base salary for the Chairman of the Board and Chief Technical Officer of
the company, Dr. Henry Samueli, whose annual base salary will remain at the
nominal level of $1.00 for 2007, in accordance with his voluntary agreement to
maintain his base salary at that amount. In addition, Dr. Samueli voluntarily
did not participate in the 2006 Performance Bonus Plan.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 18 (Thursday, January 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 5204]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1929]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6497]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Titian, Tintoretto, Veronese: Rivals in Renaissance 
Venice''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et. seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et. seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects in 
the exhibition: ``Titian, Tintoretto, Veronese: Rivals in Renaissance 
Venice,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at 
the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, MA, from on or about March 15, 2009, 
until on or about July 19, 2009, and at possible additional exhibitions 
or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public 
Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: (202-
453-8050). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th 
Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    Dated: January 22, 2009.
C. Miller Crouch,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. E9-1929 Filed 1-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,068,943
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  533,386
<ALLOWANCES>                                    25,743
<INVENTORY>                                    319,011
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,393,886
<PP&E>                                         613,400
<DEPRECIATION>                                 376,975
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,256,679
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,215,820
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         28
<COMMON>                                         8,892
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,031,939
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,256,679
<SALES>                                        346,836
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               377,277
<CGS>                                          268,572
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,311,519
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              47,569
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (981,811)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (985,011)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (985,011)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.17)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 168 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J. Res.168

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

                            Joint Resolution

 
Waiving certain enrollment requirements with respect to two bills of the 
                      One Hundred Fourth Congress.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the provisions of 
sections 106 and 107 of title 1, United States Code, are waived with 
respect to the printing (on parchment or otherwise) of the enrollment 
of H.R. 3019 and the enrollment of H.R. 3136, each of the One Hundred 
Fourth Congress. The enrollment of either such bill shall be in such 
form as the Committee on House Oversight of the House of 
Representatives certifies to be a true enrollment.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
----

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 14 December 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria

(Case C-257/05) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Infringement of Article 49 EC - Freedom to provide services - Obligation of establishment within the national territory in order to be able to provide an inspection service for boilers and pressure tanks (‘Kesselprüfstelle’))

(2006/C 331/18)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: E. Traversa and W. Bogensberger, Agents)

Defendant: Republic of Austria (represented by: E. Riedl, Agent)

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Infringement of Article 49 EC — Freedom to provide services — Obligations laid down by national legislation to have the seat of the undertaking or an establishment within the national territory in order to be able to provide an inspection service for boilers and pressure tanks (‘Kesselprüfstelle’)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

----

(1)OJ C 217, 3.9.2005.

----
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 157 (Monday, August 17, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 41369]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19496]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Ravalli County Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Ravalli County Resource Advisory Committee will be meeting 
to assign monitors on 2008 projects and hold a short public forum 
(question and answer session). The meeting is being held pursuant to 
the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 106-393) 
and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act 
of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393). The meeting is open to the public.

DATES: The meeting will be held on August 25, 2009, 6:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Bitterroot National Forest, 
Supervisor Office, 1801 N First Street, Hamilton, Montana. Send written 
comments to Daniel G Ritter, District Ranger, Stevensville Ranger 
District, 88 Main Street, Stevensville, MT 59870, by facsimile (406) 
777-7423, or electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0e6a7c677a7a6b7c4e687d20686b6a207b7d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5c382e352828392e1c3a2f723a393872292f">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel Ritter, Stevensville District 
Ranger and Designated Federal Officer, Phone: (406) 777-5461.

    Dated: August 5, 2009.
David T. Bull,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. E9-19496 Filed 8-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 **ANNUALSTATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Trust and Servicing Agreementdated as of October 1, 2015, by and among Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., asDepositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Servicer and SpecialServicer and U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator andTrustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series2015-HAUL (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein nototherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.8 of the Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, ManagingDirector of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.      A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period fromJanuary 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”) , and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and 

 

2.      To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer,has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all materialrespects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-14-00348-CV 

IN RE ANTHONY G. HEREFORD, JR., RELATOR 

 

OPINION ON ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS 

 

October 17, 2014 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. 

Pending before the court is Anthony G. Hereford, Jr.’s (Hereford) Original Petition 

for Writ of Mandamus. In it he requests that we “order the 140th District Court of 

Lubbock County, Texas,” to “consider and rule on the properly filed Motion for Speedy 

Trial . . . and Motion for Appointment of Counsel . . . .” We dismiss the petition without 

prejudice to its re-filing.

Hereford, a prisoner, seeks to proceed as an indigent and has not complied with

all the requirements of Chapter 14 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. 

See Act of June 29, 2011, 82nd Leg., 1st C.S., ch. 3, § 12.01(a), 2011 Tex. Gen. Laws

116, 161 (amending Chapter 14 effective January 1, 2012, to make it applicable to

actions, including appeals and original proceedings, brought by indigent inmates in
2

appellate courts) (current version at TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 14.002 (West

Supp. 2014)); Douglas v. Moffett, 418 S.W.3d 336, 338-39 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th

Dist.] 2013, no pet.) (discussing amendment and prior law). That is, he failed to detail, 

via affidavit, the prior actions or lawsuits, if any, he has filed; such is required by 

§ 14.004(a) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM.

CODE ANN. § 14.004(a) (West Supp. 2014). The omission was brought to his attention 

via written correspondence from this court. In that correspondence, he was afforded 

opportunity to correct the matter by October 6, 2014, and was told that the cause would 

be dismissed if he did not. That date lapsed, and Hereford has yet to comply with the 

statute. Because a relator's failure to comply with Chapter 14 renders a petition for writ 

of mandamus subject to dismissal, In re Johnson, No. 07-13-00259-CV, 2014 Tex. App. 

LEXIS 3456 (Tex. App.—Amarillo March 28, 2014, orig. proceeding), we dismiss 

Hereford’s petition for writ of mandamus.

It is so ordered.

 Per Curiam
#### § 53.4943-1 General rule; purpose.

Generally, under section 4943, the combined holdings of a private foundation and all disqualified persons (as defined in section 4946(a)) in any corporation conducting a business which is not substantially related (aside from the need of the foundation for income or funds or the use it makes of the profits derived) to the exempt purposes of the foundation are limited to 20 percent of the voting stock in such corporation. In addition, the combined holdings of a private foundation and all disqualified persons in any unincorporated business (other than a sole proprietorship) which is not substantially related (aside from the need of the foundation for income or funds or the use it makes of the profits derived) to the exempt purposes of such foundation are limited to 20 percent of the beneficial or profits interest in such business. In the case of a sole proprietorship which is not substantially related (within the meaning of the preceding sentence), section 4943 provides that a private foundation shall have no permitted holdings. These general provisions are subject to a number of exceptions and special provisions which will be described in following sections.