alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo) WELLS 

           FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certainPooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2016, by and amongWELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGOBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS LLC, as SpecialServicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator,WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee and TRIMONT REAL ESTATEADVISORS, LLC, as Operating Advisor and as Asset Representations Reviewer withrespect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2016-C37 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 of thisAgreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Servicesdo hereby certify that:

 

1.       Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision,and

 

2.       To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasexecuted this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells  Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
#### § 25.6302-1 Voluntary payments of gift taxes by electronic funds transfer.

Any person may voluntarily remit by electronic funds transfer any payment of tax to which this part 25 applies. Such payment must be made in accordance with procedures prescribed by the Commissioner.

[T.D. 8828, 64 FR 37676, July 13, 1999]
IA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 51

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to require

three-fifths majorities for bills increasing taxes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 11, 1995

Mr. PETE GEREN of Texas (for himself and Mr. BARTON of Texas) introduced

the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the

Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States to require three-fifths majorities for bills increasing taxes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission

9 for ratification:
2

•HJ 51 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE —

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. Any bill that would have the effect of

3 increasing any revenue may pass only by a three-fifths ma4 jority of the whole number of each House of Congress.

5 ‘‘SECTION 2. Except as provided in this article, total

6 revenue of the United States Government for each fiscal

7 year shall not exceed 20 percent of the gross domestic

8 product. Any revenue in excess of the limit shall be used

9 to reduce the public debt of the United States Govern10 ment.

11 ‘‘SECTION 3. A specific amount of additional revenue

12 above the limit in section 2 may be authorized for the cur13 rent or next fiscal year when a bill for this sole purpose

14 is passed by a three-fifths majority of the whole number

15 of each House of Congress and such bill becomes law.

16 ‘‘SECTION 4. Upon the President’s request, the Con17 gress by a roll call vote may waive the first three sections

18 of this article for any fiscal year in which a declaration

19 of war is in effect. Any law that has the effect of increas20 ing any revenue, if adopted when a waiver is in effect,

21 shall expire no later than 2 years after the law is adopted.

22 ‘‘SECTION 5. This article shall take effect for the first

23 fiscal year beginning after its ratification.’’.

Æ
www.gpo.gov

### §287t. Prohibition against disclosure of information or knowledge

In adopting this subchapter, it is the understanding of the Congress that the constitution of the Organization does not require, nor does this subchapter authorize, the disclosure of any information or knowledge in any case in which such disclosure is prohibited by any law of the United States.

(July 30, 1946, ch. 700, §8, 60 Stat. 714.)

#### References in Text

The constitution of the Organization, referred to in text, is the constitution of the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, which is set out as a note under section 287m of this title.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Draft environmental impactstatement, proposed revised land management plans for the Malheur, Umatilla,and Wallowa-Whitman national forests.**
 
Volumes: One | Two| Three
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.92/2:M 29/3/
Item Number:0080-F-03 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000923158
 
December 28, 2017
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.6230(e)-1 Tax matters partner required to furnish names. ( a ) *In general.* If a notice of the beginning of an administrative proceeding is mailed to the tax matters partner with respect to any partnership taxable year, the tax matters partner shall furnish to the Internal Revenue Service office that issued the notice the name, address, profits interest, and taxpayer identification number of each person who was a partner in the partnership at any time during that taxable year if that information was not provided on the partnership return filed for that year.
( b ) *Revised or additional information.* If the tax matters partner discovers that any information furnished to the Internal Revenue Service on the partnership return or under paragraph (a) of this section was incorrect or incomplete, the tax matters partner shall furnish revised or additional information to the Internal Revenue Service within 15 days of discovering that the information furnished to the Internal Revenue Service was incorrect or incomplete.
( c ) *Information required with respect to indirect partners.* The requirements of this section for identifying information apply with respect to indirect partners to the extent that the tax matters partner has such information.
( d ) *Effective date.* This section is applicable to partnership taxable years beginning on or after October 4, 2001. For years beginning prior to October 4, 2001, see § 301.6230(e)-1T contained in 26 CFR part 1, revised April 1, 2001.
[T.D. 8965, 66 FR 50556, Oct. 4, 2001]
Exhibit 99.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Common Goal Health Care Pension
and Income Fund L.P. II, a Delaware limited partnership (the "Company"), on Form
10-QSB for the period  ending June 30, 2002,  as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Albert E. Jenkins,
III, Chief Executive  Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Common Goal Capital
Group, Inc., II, the managing general partner of the Company,  certify, pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge and based on my review of the
Report:


     1. the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




                              By:      Common Goal Capital Group, Inc., II
                                       Managing General Partner


                              By:      /s/ Albert E. Jenkins, III
                                       -----------------------------------
                                       Albert E. Jenkins, III
                                       Chief Executive Officer and
                                       Chief Financial Officer

                                       August 14, 2002
Exhibit 33.13



|     |  |                                                                  
|---- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | 130 S Jefferson Street
Suite 300 Chicago, IL 60631
(312) 233-6440
|    
|    
|    

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND

EXCHANGE COMMISSIONS REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

For
the calendar year ending December 31, 2017, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service

Vendor for Wells Fargo Bank(the
Servicer).

National Tax Search, LLC (NTS) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2017 and for
the period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the Reporting Period) with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the CFR). NTS has used
the servicing criteria communicated to NTS by the Servicer to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Only servicing criteria 1122 (d) (1)(ii), 1122 (d)1(iv), 1122 (d)2(ii), 1122 (d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and
1122(d)(4)(xii) (the Applicable Servicing Criteria) are applicable to the activities NTS performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122
(d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. The transactions covered by this report include all tax payments made on behalf of the Servicer using NTSs
TaxQ system (the Platform Transactions).

NTS, as a vendor, has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the
Reporting Period and has concluded that NTS has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2017 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform Transactions taken as a whole.

Plante & Moran, PLLC, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2017 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

National Tax Search, LLC, as
Vendor to Servicer



|                            
|----------------------------
|/s/ Lori D. Eshoo           
|Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO
|January 26, 2018
§ 1.996-5 Adjustment to basis. ( a ) *Addition to basis.* Under section 996(e)(1) amounts representing deemed distributions as provided in section 995(b) shall increase the basis of the stock with respect to which the distribution is made.
( b ) *Reductions of basis.* Under section 996(e)(2), the portion of an actual distribution treated as made out of previously taxed income shall reduce the basis of the stock with respect to which it is made and, to the extent that it exceeds the adjusted basis of such stock, shall be treated as gain from the sale or exchange of property. In the case of stock includible in the gross estate of a decedent for which an election is made under section 2032 (relating to alternate valuation), this paragraph shall not apply to any distribution made after the date of the decendent's death and before the alternate valuation date provided by section 2032. See section 1014(d) for a special rule for determining the basis of stock in a DISC, or former DISC, acquired from a decedent.
[T.D. 7324, 39 FR 35124, Sept. 30, 1974]
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Quan Minh TRAN, aka David Tran, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 99-50771.

D.C. No. CR-98-00116-02-AHS.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 3, 2002.*

Decided June 5, 2002.

Before O’SCANNLAIN, RYMER, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Defendant-Appellant Quan Minh Tran appeals his conviction for conspiring to and collecting payments on extensions of credit by extortionate means in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 894. Because the parties are familiar with the factual and procedural history of the case, we do not recount it here. We affirm.

Tran argues that the district court erred when it allowed the case agent to express her opinion interpreting the meaning of a recorded statement. Because Tran did not object to introduction of the evidence at trial on the same basis that he now asserts on appeal, we review the trial court’s decision for plain error. *See United States v. Varela-Rivera,*279 F.3d 1174, 1178 n. 3 (9th Cir.2002) (reviewing the admission of evidence for plain error when the defendant objected to the evidence on other grounds below). We may reverse for plain error when (1) there is error; (2) that is plain; (3) that affects substantial rights; and (4) the error “seriously affects the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings.” *United States v. Olano,*507 U.S. 725, 733-37, 113 S.Ct. 1770, 123 L.Ed.2d 508 (1993) (internal quotation marks, alterations, and citation omitted); *see also United States v. Perez,*116 F.3d 840, 846 (9th Cir.1997) (en banc). “An error is plain when it is ‘clear’ or *276‘obvious’ under the law.” *Id.*(quoting *Olano,*507 U.S. at 734).

Even assuming admission of the agent’s opinion constituted “clear” or “obvious” error, an issue we need not reach, it did not affect Tran’s substantial rights. Tran has not met his burden of showing that the error “affected the outcome of the district court proceedings.” *Olano,*507 U.S. at 734. Given the statements made by Tran on the tapes as well as the trial testimony of both Marquette and Ty Nguyen, the jury quite likely would have convicted Tran even without the agent’s opinion testimony and without the government’s brief reference to her opinion in its rebuttal closing argument.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 154 (Wednesday, August 12, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40602-40603]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19242]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration


Center for Substance Abuse Treatment; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given that the 
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) 
Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT) National Advisory Council 
will meet on August 24, 2009 from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. via teleconference.
    The meeting will include discussion and evaluation of grant 
applications reviewed by Initial Review Groups. Therefore, the meeting 
will be closed to the public as determined by the Administrator, 
SAMHSA, in accordance with Title 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6) and 5 U.S.C. App. 
2, section 10(d).
    Substantive program information, a summary of the meeting and a 
roster of Council members may be obtained as soon as possible after the 
meeting, either by accessing the SAMHSA Committee Web site at http://www.nac.samhsa.gov, or by contacting CSAT National Advisory Council's 
Designated Federal Official, Ms. Cynthia Graham (see contact 
information below).

    Committee Name: SAMHSA Center for Substance Abuse Treatment 
National Advisory Council.
    Dates/Times/Types: August 24, 2009, from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m.: 
Closed.
    Place: SAMHSA Building, 1 Choke Cherry Road, Great Falls Room, 
Rockville, Maryland 20857.
    Contact: Cynthia Graham, M.S., Designated Federal Official, 
SAMHSA CSAT National Advisory Council, 1 Choke Cherry Road, Room 5-
1035, Rockville, Maryland 20857. Telephone: (240) 276-1692. Fax: 
(240) 276-

[[Page 40603]]

1690. E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5d3e24332935343c733a2f3c353c301d2e3c30352e3c7335352e733a322b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e3809a8d978b8a82cd8491828b828ea390828e8b9082cd8b8b90cd848c95">[email protected]</span></a>.

Toian Vaughn,
Committee Management Officer, Substance Abuse and Mental Health 
Services Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-19242 Filed 8-11-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Chanel Senor, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.

[803 NYS2d 823]

*852Crew III, J.P.

Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (Collins, J.), entered May 10, 2004, which, inter alia, denied claimant’s motion for summary judgment.

Claimant, a prison inmate, allegedly exacerbated a preexisting back injury in October 2003 while using a jackhammer as part of his facility work detail. When claimant refused further participation in the work detail, he was placed in keeplock. Claimant thereafter filed the instant claim alleging that defendant’s agent was negligent in ordering him to use the subject jackhammer and in wrongfully confining him to keeplock. Following service of defendant’s answer, claimant moved for, inter alia, summary judgment. The Court of Claims denied claimant’s motion finding, among other things, that claimant’s motion papers were deficient. This appeal by claimant ensued.

We affirm. Preliminarily, it appears that claimant’s moving papers did not include the relevant pleadings and, as such, his motion for summary judgment was properly denied in its entirety on that ground alone *(see Bonded Concrete v Town of Saugerties,*3 AD3d 729, 730 [2004], *lv dismissed*2 NY3d 793 [2004]). Moreover, while the record contains copies of prescriptions for various medications provided to claimant and portions of his ambulatory health record, there simply is nothing in the record to support claimant’s assertion of a preexisting back injury, nor is there any evidence that the October 2003 incident exacerbated any such injury. Absent such proof, claimant’s motion for summary judgment as to his negligence claim was properly denied.

We reach a similar conclusion with regard to the wrongful confinement claim. Although defendant no longer opposes claimant’s motion to the extent that it seeks summary judgment on the issue of liability for wrongful confinement in excess of seven days, claimant is arguing that his confinement was wrongful in its entirety, and there remain questions of fact on that point as well as what damages, if any, were suffered by claimant as a result. Accordingly, summary judgment was appropriately denied as to this portion of the underlying claim as well.

Mugglin, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.
§ 48.6416(e)-1 Refund to exporter or shipper. ( a ) *In general.* Any payment of tax imposed by sections 4041, 4051 or chapter 32 that is determined to be an overpayment within the meaning of section 6416(b)(2) (A) or (E), section 6416(b)(3)(C) (prior to January 7, 1983), or section 6416(b)(4), and the regulations thereunder, by reason of the exportation of any article may be refunded to the exporter or shipper of the article pursuant to section 6416(c) of this section, if— ( 1 ) The exporter or shipper files a claim for refund of the overpayment, and
( 2 ) The person who paid the tax waives the right to claim credit or refund of the tax. No interest shall be paid on any refund allowed under this section. For provisions relating to the evidence required in support of a claim under this paragraph (a), see § 301.6402 of this chapter (Regulations on Procedure and Administration) and paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) *Supporting evidence required.* No claim for refund of any overpayment of tax to which this section applies shall be allowed unless the exporter or shipper submits with that claim proof of exportation in the form prescribed by the regulations under section 4221, and a statement, signed by the person who paid the tax, showing— ( 1 ) That the person who paid the tax waives the right to claim credit or refund of the tax,
( 2 ) In the case of an overpayment determined under section 6416(b)(2)(A) and paragraph (b) of § 48.6416(b)(2)-2 in respect of a truck, bus, tractor, etc., taxable under section 4061(a), that, pursuant to section 6416(g), the person who paid the tax possessed at the time that person shipped the article or at the time title to the article passed to that perons's vendee, whichever is earlier, evidence that the article was to be exported to a foreign country or shipped to a possession of the United States.
( 3 ) The amount of tax paid on the sale of the article and the date of payment, and
( 4 ) The internal revenue service office to which the tax was paid.
[T.D. 8043, 50 FR 32034, Aug. 8, 1985]
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **CMBS Department**

 

MAC N9401-011

1055 10th Avenue SE

Minneapolis, MN 55414 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. 

1585 BROADWAY

NEW YORK, New York 10036-8200

 

RE: Annual Statement ofCompliance for Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. Commercial Mortgage Pass ThroughCertificates, Series 2016-BNK2

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of November 1, 2016 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the yearending December 31, 2016 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

/s/ Gail Vannest

GAIL VANNEST

Vice President

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.