alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 31.3231(e)-1 Compensation. ( a ) *Definition* — ( 1 ) The term *compensation* has the same meaning as the term *wages* in section 3121(a), determined without regard to section 3121(b)(9), except as specifically limited by the Railroad Retirement Tax Act (chapter 22 of the Internal Revenue Code) or regulation. The Commissioner may provide any additional guidance that may be necessary or appropriate in applying the definitions of sections 3121(a) and 3231(e).
( 2 ) A payment made by an employer to an individual through the employer's payroll is presumed, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, to be compensation for services rendered as an employee of the employer. Likewise, a payment made by an employee organization to an employee representative through the organization's payroll is presumed, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, to be compensation for services rendered by the employee representative as such. For rules regarding the treatment of deductions by an employer from remuneration of an employee, see § 31.3123-1.
( 3 ) The term *compensation* is not confined to amounts paid for active service, but includes amounts paid for an identifiable period during which the employee is absent from the active service of the employer and, in the case of an employee representative, amounts paid for an identifiable period during which the employee representative is absent from the active service of the employee organization.
( 4 ) Compensation includes amounts paid to an employee for loss of earnings during an identifiable period as the result of the displacement of the employee to a less remunerative position or occupation as well as pay for time lost.
( 5 ) For rules regarding the treatment of reimbursement and other expense allowance amounts, see § 31.3121(a)-3. For rules regarding the inclusion of fringe benefits in compensation, see § 31.3121(a)-1T.
( 6 ) *Split-dollar life insurance arrangements. See* §§ 1.61-22 and 1.7872-15 of this chapter for rules relating to the treatment of split-dollar life insurance arrangements.
( b ) *Special Rules.* ( 1 ) If the amount of compensation earned in any calendar month by an individual as an employee in the service of a local lodge or division of a railway-labor-organization employer is less than $25, the amount is disregarded for purposes of determining the employee tax under section 3201 and the employer tax under section 3221.
( 2 ) Compensation for service as a delegate to a national or international convention of a railway-labor-organization employer is disregarded for purposes of determining the employee tax under section 3201 and the employer tax under section 3221 if the individual rendering the service has not previously rendered service, other than as a delegate, which may be included in the individual's years of service for purposes of the Railroad Retirement Act.
( 3 ) For special provisions relating to the compensation of certain general chairs or assistant general chairs of a general committee of a railway-labor-organization employer, see paragraph (c)(3) of § 31.3231(b)-1.
[T.D. 8582, 59 FR 66191, Dec. 23, 1994, as amended by T.D. 9092, 68 FR 54361, Sept. 17, 2003]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         232,663
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  383,253
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (67,743)
<INVENTORY>                                    240,744
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,135,366
<PP&E>                                         569,744
<DEPRECIATION>                               (288,528)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,776,073
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,856,326
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         19
<COMMON>                                         9,006
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,776,073
<SALES>                                      1,175,107
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,175,107
<CGS>                                          882,628
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,686,244
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,370,646
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              99,553
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,470,199)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,470,199)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,470,199)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  ($0.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  ($0.46)
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-07-381-CR

BEATE ELIZABETH EGERTON	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Appellant Beate Elizabeth Egerton attempts to appeal from the trial court’s judgment sentencing her to thirty days’ confinement for the offense of driving while intoxicated.  Because we do not have jurisdiction, we dismiss the appeal.

	The trial court signed the judgment on September 11, 2007.  Egerton did not file a motion for new trial; thus, her notice of appeal was due October 11, 2007.  See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a).  Egerton filed her notice of appeal on October 12, 2007, one day late.  See id.  On November 8, 2007, we sent notice to Egerton that because of the apparent untimeliness of the appeal, we would dismiss unless she responded with proof that she filed the notice of appeal by mail on or before October 11, 2007.  See Tex. R. App. P. 9.2(b)(1), (2).  Egerton responded that she could not provide any proof of timely mailing because she filed the untimely notice of appeal in person.

	A notice of appeal that complies with the requirements of rule 26 is essential to vest this court with jurisdiction.  See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522-23 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); see also Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998).  Because Egerton failed to timely file her notice of appeal, we have no basis for jurisdiction over this appeal.  Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

							PER CURIAM

PANEL D:  HOLMAN, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED:  December 13, 2007
§ 54.6695-1 Other assessable penalties with respect to the preparation of tax returns for other persons. ( a ) *In general.* A person who is a tax return preparer of any return or claim for refund of tax under chapter 43 of subtitle D of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) shall be subject to penalties for failure to furnish a copy to the taxpayer under section 6695(a) of the Code, failure to sign the return under section 6695(b) of the Code, failure to furnish an identification number under section 6695(c) of the Code, failure to retain a copy or list under section 6695(d) of the Code, failure to file a correct information return under section 6695(e) of the Code, and negotiation of a check under section 6695(f) of the Code, in the manner stated in § 1.6695-1 of this chapter.
( b ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section is applicable to returns and claims for refund filed after December 31, 2008.
[T.D. 9436, 73 FR 78459, Dec. 22, 2008]
#### § 48.6416(f)-1 Credit on returns.

Any person entitled to claim refund of any overpayment of tax imposed by section 4041, 4042, 4051 or chapter 32 may, in lieu of claiming refund of the overpayment, claim credit for the overpayment on any return of tax under this subpart subsequently filed. Any such credit claimed on a return must be supported by the evidence prescribed in the applicable regulations in this subpart and § 301.6402 of this chapter (Regulations on Procedure and Administration).

[T.D. 8043, 50 FR 32034, Aug. 8, 1985]
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 151 (Friday, August 7, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39641-39646]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18954]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal Nos. 09-30]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 
601-3740.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittals 09-30 with attached transmittal, and 
policy justification.

    Dated: July 28, 2009.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register, Liaison Officer Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P

[[Page 39642]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07AU09.067


[[Page 39643]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07AU09.068


[[Page 39644]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07AU09.069


[[Page 39645]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07AU09.070


[[Page 39646]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07AU09.071

[FR Doc. E9-18954 Filed 8-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
(November 18, 2005)

#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. John N. Tasolides, on Behalf of Alexander Karshenboym, Petitioner, v Anthony Amicucci, Warden of the Westchester County Jail, Respondent.

[803 NYS2d 924]

Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application to reduce bail upon Westchester County indictment No. 381-05.

Adjudged that the writ is sustained, without costs or disbursements, to the extent of reducing bail for Alexander Karshenboym on Westchester County indictment No. 381-05 to the sum of $750,000, which may be posted in the form of an insurance company bail bond in that sum or by depositing the same sum as a cash bail alternative, with a bail sufficiency hearing to be held pursuant to CEL 520.30; all conditions imposed by the County Court, Westchester County, in conjunction with the original bail set on October 24, 2005, are to remain as conditions of the reduced bail. Florio, J.P., Schmidt, Fisher and Dillon, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 100 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 100

  To encourage States to study and adopt interstate compacts for the 
                  regulation of interstate insurance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 11, 1995

   Mr. Moorhead introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
  referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the 
 Committee on Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by 
the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  To encourage States to study and adopt interstate compacts for the 
                  regulation of interstate insurance.
Whereas Article I of the Constitution of the United States authorizes 
        cooperation among the States through the use of interstate compacts;
Whereas the McCarran-Ferguson Act recognizes that the regulation by the several 
        States of the business of insurance is in the public interest;
Whereas there are more than 140 interstate compacts in effect today that have 
        proven to be effective and efficient mechanisms for the States to 
        strengthen and coordinate their regulatory responsibilities, 
        particularly as they affect complicated and comprehensive multistate 
        issues;
Whereas it is in the best interests of the people of the United States for the 
        regulatory capability of those States to be enhanced; and
Whereas the business of insurance is increasingly a multistate and international 
        business: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. INSURANCE COMPACTS.

    The Congress acknowledges the benefits of interstate compacts to 
address multistate problems. To the extent that they are not already 
empowered to do so, the States are encouraged and authorized to study 
and to adopt, where appropriate, interstate insurance regulatory 
compacts to address regulatory issues, including the regulation of 
alien (non-United States) insurers and reinsurers, insurer solvency, 
rehabilitation and liquidation, guaranty fund protection, and insurance 
agent licensing.
                                 <all>
```
§ 53.6695-1 Other assessable penalties with respect to the preparation of tax returns or claims for refund for other persons. ( a ) *In general.* A person who is a tax return preparer of any return or claim for refund of tax under Chapter 42 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) shall be subject to penalties for failure to furnish a copy to the taxpayer under section 6695(a) of the Code, failure to sign the return under section 6695(b) of the Code, failure to furnish an identification number under section 6695(c) of the Code, failure to retain a copy or list under section 6695(d) of the Code, failure to file a correct information return under section 6695(e) of the Code, and negotiation of a check under section 6695(f) of the Code, in the manner stated in § 1.6695-1 of this chapter.
( b ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section is applicable to returns and claims for refund filed after December 31, 2008.
[T.D. 9436, 73 FR 78458, Dec. 22, 2008]
Exhibit 32.2

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of HQ Sustainable Maritime Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Jean-Pierre Dallaire, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 3, 2006



/s/ Jean-Pierre DallaireJean-Pierre DallairePrincipal Financial and Accounting Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 148 Introduced in House (IH)]

  2d Session
H. J. RES. 148

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1996, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 1996

Mr. Obey introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1996, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That section 106(c) of Public 
Law 104-56 is amended by striking ``December 15, 1995'' and inserting 
``July 31, 1996''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 30 Engrossed in House (EH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 30

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, 
February 16, 1995, it stand adjourned until 12:30 p.m. on Tuesday, 
February 21, 1995, or until noon on the second day after Members are 
notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent 
resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses 
or adjourns at the close of business on Thursday, February 16, 1995, 
pursuant to a motion made by the majority leader or his designee, in 
accordance with this resolution, it stand recessed or adjourned until 
noon, or at such time on that day as may be specified by the majority 
leader or his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, on 
Wednesday, February 22, 1995, or until noon on the second day after 
Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the majority leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the minority leader of 
the House and the minority leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, 
in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 16, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
                                     

104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 30

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

            Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1009 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Private Calendar No. 4
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1009

                          [Report No. 104-546]

                   For the relief of Lloyd B. Gamble.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 21, 1995

  Mr. Davis introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

                              May 1, 1996

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                   For the relief of Lloyd B. Gamble.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS.

    (a) Payment.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of any 
money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to Lloyd B. Gamble of 
Fairfax, Virginia, the sum of $253,488.
    (b) Basis.--The payment required by subsection (a) shall be to 
compensate Lloyd B. Gamble for the injuries sustained by him as a 
result of the administration to him, without his knowledge, of lysergic 
acid diethylamide by United States Army personnel in 1957.

SEC. 2. SATISFACTION OF CLAIMS.

    The payment made pursuant to section 1 shall be in full 
satisfaction of all claims Lloyd B. Gamble may have against the United 
States for any injury described in such section.

SEC. 3. INELIGIBILITY FOR ADDITIONAL BENEFITS.

    Upon payment of the sum referred to in section 1, Lloyd B. Gamble 
shall not be eligible for any compensation or benefits from the 
Department of Veterans Affairs or the Department of Defense for any 
injury described in such section.

SEC. 4. LIMITATION OF AGENTS AND ATTORNEYS FEES.

    It shall be unlawful for an amount of more than 10 percent of the 
amount paid pursuant to section 1 to be paid to or received by any 
agent or attorney for any service rendered to Lloyd B. Gamble in 
connection with the benefits provided by this Act. Any person who 
violates this section shall be guilty of an infraction and shall be 
subject to a fine in the amount provided in title 18, United States 
Code.
                                     

                                                 Private Calendar No. 4

104th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1009

                          [Report No. 104-546]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

                   For the relief of Lloyd B. Gamble.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 1, 1996

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House and ordered to be printed
```
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Referenceis hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as ofApril 1, 2017, by and among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC.,as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer,RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Trustee and PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Operating Advisorand as Asset Representations Reviewer with respect to Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates Series 2017-BNK4 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement. 

 

Pursuantto Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice Presidentof Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that: 

 

1.A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from April1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and 

 

2.To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period. 

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28thday of February 2018. 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober 

DanielBober 

ExecutiveVice President

WellsFargo Bank 

 

 

| Wells  Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo)  Together we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|