alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 99 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
H. J. RES. 99

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
                      prohibit the death penalty.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 30, 1995

   Mr. Gonzalez introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
                      prohibit the death penalty.
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, to be valid only if 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of the final passage of this joint 
resolution:

                              ``Article--

    ``The death penalty shall not be imposed or executed by the United 
States, or by any State, Territory or other jurisdiction within the 
United States.''.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-30521 Summary Calendar

MICHAEL J. RILEY, SR., individually and on behalf of the class, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus TIG INSURANCE CO.; VALCO-USA CORP., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CV-2267

- - - - - - - - - - May 28, 1997 Before SMITH, DUHE’ and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Michael J. Riley, Sr., appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants. The record indicates that the mortgage debt exceeded the amount of loss, thus precluding recovery by Riley. See American General Fire & Casualty Co. v. Reese , 853 F.2d 370, 373 (5th Cir. 1988); Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Louisiana Ins. Guar. Ass'n , 514 So. 2dNo. 96-30521 - 2 - 245, 247 (La. Ct. App. 1987). As Riley has no continuing interest in the property, he would not benefit from any extinguishment of debt or additional repairs that might be made if additional sums were paid to the mortgagee. To the extent Riley claims reimbursement for prior expenses based upon his reliance interest in a policy of insurance, his claim is to no avail as the district court correctly held that he could not have reasonably relied upon the certificate of insurance when it explicitly referenced the master policy and when no document named Riley as an insured at the time of the loss. Furthermore, Riley failed to submit evidence to the district court regarding sums expended as a result of his reliance.
AFFIRMED.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1014

To authorize extension of time limitation for a FERC-issued hydroelectric

license.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 22, 1995

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To authorize extension of time limitation for a FERC-issued

hydroelectric license.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding the time limitation of section 13 of

4 the Federal Power Act, the Federal Energy Regulatory

5 Commission, upon the request of the licensee for FERC

6 Project No. 3701, is authorized, in accordance with the

7 good faith, due diligence, and public interest requirements

8 of section 13 and the Commission’s procedures under such

9 section, to extend until May 31, 2001, the time required

10 for the licensee to commence the construction of such
2

•HR 1014 IH

1 project. This section shall take effect for the project upon

2 the expiration of the extension (issued by the Commission

3 under section 13) of the period required for commence4 ment of construction of such project. If the license for

5 FERC Project 3701 should expire prior to the date of en6 actment of this Act, the Commission is authorized and di7 rected to reinstate effective June 1, 1995, the license pre8 viously issued for such project, to extend until May 31,

9 2001, the time required for the licensee to commence the

10 construction of such project.

Æ
§ 1.24 Disclosure of records to person other than the individual to whom they pertain. ( a ) *Conditions of disclosure.* No component of Treasury is required to disclose any record which is contained in a system of records maintained by it by any means of communication to any person, or to another agency, except pursuant to a written request by, or with the prior written consent of, the individual to whom the record pertains, or the parent, if a minor, or legal guardian, if incompetent, of such individual, unless disclosure of the record would be: ( 1 ) To those offices and employees of the Treasury who have a need for the record in the performance of their duties;
( 2 ) Required under 5 U.S.C. 552 (subpart A of this part);
( 3 ) For a routine use as defined in 5 U.S.C. 552a(a)(7) and § 1.21(g) and as described under 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4)(D) and § 1.23(a)(4);
( 4 ) To the Bureau of the Census for the purposes of planning or carrying out a census or survey or related activity pursuant to the provisions of title 13 of the U.S. Code;
( 5 ) To a recipient who has provided the component with advance adequate written assurance that the record will be used solely as statistical research or reporting record, and the record is to be transferred in a form that is not individually identifiable;
( 6 ) To the National Archives and Records Administration as a record which has sufficient historical or other value to warrant its continued preservation by the United States Government, or for evaluation by the Administrator of the General Services Administration or the designee of such official to determine whether the record has such value;
( 7 ) To another agency or to an instrumentality of any governmental jurisdiction within or under the control of the United States for a civil or criminal law enforcement activity, if: ( i ) The activity is authorized by law; and
( ii ) The head of the agency or instrumentality has made a written request to the Treasury specifying the particular portion desired and the law enforcement activities for which the record is sought;
( 8 ) To a person pursuant to a showing of compelling circumstances affecting the health or safety of an individual, if upon such disclosure, notification is transmitted to the last known address of such individual;
( 9 ) To either House of Congress, or, to the extent a matter is within its jurisdiction, any committee or subcommittee thereof, any joint committee of Congress or subcommittee of any such joint committee;
( 10 ) To the Comptroller General, or the authorized representatives of such official, in the course of the performance of the duties of the Government Accountability Office;
( 11 ) Pursuant to the order of a court of competent jurisdiction (see 5 U.S.C. 552a(b)); or
( 12 ) To a consumer reporting agency in accordance with 13 U.S.C. 3711(e).
( b ) [Reserved]
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of Owl Rock Capital Corporation II (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to the undersigned’s knowledge:

 

1) the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2) the information contained in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|                     |        |        |                                                     |
|---------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
| Date: March 4, 2022 |   | By:    | /s/ Bryan Cole                                      |
|                |   |   | Bryan Cole                                          |
|                |   |   | Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 58 Received in Senate (RDS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 58

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                April 6 (legislative day, April 5), 1995

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
            Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Friday, April 7, 
1995, it stand adjourned until 12:30 p.m. on Monday, May 1, 1995, or 
until noon on the second day after Members are notified to reassemble 
pursuant to section 3 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs 
first; and that when the Senate adjourns or recesses at the close of 
business on Thursday, April 6, 1995, Friday, April 7, 1995, Saturday, 
April 8, 1995, 
Sunday, April 9, 1995, or Monday, April 10, 1995, pursuant to a motion 
made by the majority leader, or his designee, in accordance with this 
concurrent resolution, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on 
Monday, April 24, 1995, or such time on that day as may be specified by 
the majority leader or his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, 
or until noon on the second day after Members are notified to 
reassemble pursuant to section 3 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. When the House adjourns on the legislative day of 
Wednesday, May 3, 1995, it stand adjourned until 12:30 p.m. on Tuesday, 
May 9, 1995, or until noon on the second day after Members are notified 
to reassemble pursuant to section 3 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 3. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble 
whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 6, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Record of Discussion D ocket N o. F /\/\- Direc to rate Id e ntifi e r: 

# ":)d 

# l



# ~- 

# c t

**~oi S'-**  

# 4P

**~D** W ith whom outs ide th e FAA has this acti on been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA , A O P A, ALPA, GAMA, etc)?

ORGA NIZATION PE RSO N CONTACT E D D ATE T OPICS DISCU SSED 

### Exp erimental Scan E lliot Decemb er 5, 2013 No response . 

### Aircra f t Association Aircraft Owners and Robert Hackman December 5, 2013 No response . 

### Pilots Associ a tion Alexand r ia Aircraft Andrew Vano December 5, 2013 Concur. 

### LLC (D e sign Approval H o lder) Be llanca-Champion R o bert Szego December 5, 2013 No re spons e. 

### C lub O ther / Ad d itional In fo rmatio n:

9
§ 801.1 Balanced performance measurement system; in general. ( a ) *In general.* ( 1 ) The regulations in this part 801 implement the provisions of sections 1201 and 1204 of the Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 (Public Law 105-106, 112 Stat. 685, 715-716, 722) (the Act) and provide rules relating to the establishment by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) of a balanced performance measurement system.
( 2 ) Modern management practice and various statutory and regulatory provisions require the IRS to set performance goals for organizational units and to measure the results achieved by those units with respect to those goals. To fulfill these requirements, the IRS has established a balanced performance measurement system, composed of three elements: Customer Satisfaction Measures; Employee Satisfaction Measures; and Business Results Measures. The IRS is likewise required to establish a performance evaluation system for individual employees.
( b ) [Reserved]
[T.D. 9227, 70 FR 60215, Oct. 17, 2005. Redesignated and amended by T.D. 9426, 73 FR 60628, Oct. 14, 2008]
#### Allcity Insurance Company, Appellant, v Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority et al., Defendants, and Hanover Insurance Company, Respondent.

[804 NYS2d 62]

Judgment (denominated an order), Supreme Court, Bronx County (Dianne T. Renwick, J.), entered January 6, 2005, which denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and granted defendant-respondent’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint and awarding defendant-respondent judgment on its counterclaim, unanimously modified, on the law, to declare in defendant-respondent’s favor that it had no duty to defend or indemnify the New York City Transit Authority, and otherwise affirmed, with costs in favor of defendant-respondent payable by plaintiff.

Defendant-respondent did not provide coverage to the Transit Authority, the certificate of insurance notwithstanding *(see Insurance Corp. of N.Y. v U.S. Underwriters Ins. Co.,*11 AD3d 235 [2004]), and its denial of control over or involvement in the third-party action commenced by the Transit Authority against its insured was unrebutted. Thus, there was no possibility it would be subrogated to its own insured *(cf. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa. v State Ins. Fund,*213 AD2d 164, 166 [1995] ; *National Cas. Co. v State Ins. Fund,*227 AD2d 115, 117 [1996] , *lv denied*88 NY2d 813 [1996]).

We modify solely to declare in defendant-respondent’s favor *(see Lanza v Wagner,*11 NY2d 317, 334 [1962], *cert denied*371 US 901 [1962]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Tom, Andrias, Sullivan and Malone, JJ.
www.gpo.gov

### §275a. Permanent International Commission of the Congresses of Navigation; authorization of appropriations

Not to exceed $45,000 annually of the funds appropriated for rivers and harbors shall be available for the support and maintenance of the Permanent International Commission of the Congresses of Navigation and for the payment in amounts approved by the Chief of Engineers of the expenses of the properly accredited delegates of the United States to the meetings of the congresses and of the Commission.

(June 30, 1948, ch. 771, title I, §107, 62 Stat. 1174; Pub. L. 89–298, title III, §306, Oct. 27, 1965, 79 Stat. 1094; Pub. L. 93–251, title I, §93, Mar. 7, 1974, 88 Stat. 39.)

#### Amendments

1974—Pub. L. 93–251 substituted “$45,000” for “$22,000”.

1965—Pub. L. 89–298 substituted “$22,000” for “$5,000”.
EXHIBIT 10.3(b)


2007 AMENDMENT TO
 THE DIRECTORS DEFERRED
 COMPENSATION STOCK PLAN


          The Board amends the Plan, effective February 12, 2007, as follows:

          Section 10(a) is hereby amended by replacing the current text with the following text:

          In the event of a stock dividend, stock split, recapitalization, merger in which the Company is the surviving corporation or other capital adjustment affecting shares of the Common Stock outstanding, an appropriate adjustment shall be made to the aggregate number of shares the Company may issue under the Plan and the number of shares in each Share Account.  All such adjustments will be effected in a manner that precludes the enlargement of rights and benefits under outstanding stock awards.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2016, byand among GS MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORPORATION II, as Depositor, WELLS FARGOBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, ADIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as General Special Servicer, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as AMA Plaza Special Servicer, AEGON USAREALTY ADVISORS, LLC, as 225 Bush Street Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Trustee and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as OperatingAdvisor and as Asset Representations Reviewer with respect to CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2016-GS4 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial MortgageServices do hereby certify that:

 

1.            A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period fromNovember 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the “ReportingPeriod”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period hasbeen made under my supervision, and 

 

2.            To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day ofFebruary 2017.

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President 

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
#### In the Matter of Gregory Gelman, Appellant, v Brion D. Travis, as Chair of the Board of Parole, Respondent.

[802 NYS2d 640]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Canfield, J.), entered April 1, 2004 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Since the determination giving rise to this CPLR article 78 proceeding, petitioner has reappeared before the Board of Parole and again was denied parole release. Given petitioner’s subsequent reappearance before the Board in June 2004, the instant matter is now moot and must be dismissed (see *Matter of Rivera v Travis,*8 AD3d 716 [2004]).

Cardona, PJ., Crew III, Carpinello, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
February
      28, 2007

    


    Dr.
      Stephen Chang

    President
      & CEO

    MultiCell
      Technologies, Inc.

    701
      George Washington Highway

    Lincoln,
      Rhode Island 02865

    


    Re:
      Additional Transaction

    


    Dear
      Stephen:

    


    Reference
      is made to the Convertible Debenture dated February 28, 2007 (the “Convertible
      Debenture”) issued by MultiCell Technologies, Inc. (“Company”) to La Jolla Cove
      Investors, Inc. (“Holder”). All terms used herein and not otherwise defined
      herein shall have the definitions set forth in the Convertible
      Debenture.

    


    The
      parties shall enter into an additional convertible debenture in the principal
      amount equal to $1,000,000 to purchase common stock on the same terms and
      conditions as the Convertible Debenture. The parties must enter into such
      additional convertible debenture no later than thirty days after the principal
      amount outstanding under the Convertible Debenture is less than $250,000. In
      the
      event that Holder fails to enter into the additional debenture in accordance
      with the terms of this paragraph, Holder shall pay the Company liquidated
      damages of $100,000.

    


    Sincerely,

    


    /s/T.W.
      Huff

    


    Travis
      W.
      Huff

    Portfolio
      Manager

    


    


    ACKNOWLEDGED
      AND AGREED:

    


    MultiCell
      Technologies, Inc.

    


    By:
      /s/Stephen
      MW Chang

    


    Title:
      President
      & CEO
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Referenceis hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September1, 2015, by and among CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC., asDepositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, LNRPARTNERS, LLC, as Special Servicer, SITUS HOLDINGS, LLC, as Operating Advisor,CITIBANK N.A., as Certificate Administrator and DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANYAMERICAS as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates, Series 2015-GC33 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized termsused herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in theAgreement.

 

Pursuantto Section 10.08 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice Presidentof Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.       Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.       To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28thday of February 2018.

 

 

/s/Daniel Bober

DanielBober 

ExecutiveVice President 

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **CMBS Department**

 

MAC N9401-011

1055 10th Avenue SE

Minneapolis, MN 55414 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. 

1585 BROADWAY

NEW YORK, New York 10036-8200

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliancefor Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2015-C24, CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C24

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of August 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the yearending December 31, 2016 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

/s/ Gail Vannest

GAIL VANNEST

Vice President

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.