alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Description of executive officer cash compensation for 2006



 Exhibit 10.24 
 ACE LIMITED 
 DESCRIPTION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CASH COMPENSATION 
 FOR 2006 
 Set forth below are the 2006
annual base salaries of the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and each of the three other most highly compensated executive officers in 2006 who were executive officers as of December 31, 2006. 
 Evan Greenberg, President and Chief Executive Officer 
 $1,000,000 
 Philip Bancroft, Chief Financial Officer 
 $670,000 
 Robert Cusumano, General
Counsel and Secretary 
 $500,000 
 Brian Dowd, Chief Executive Officer Insurance-North American 
 $625,000 
 Paul Medini, Chief Accounting Officer 
 $400,000 
 In addition to the above, these officers receive an annual bonus for 2006 that is determined in the first quarter of
2007 and perquisites and other personal benefits that may include housing allowances, personal use of the Company aircraft, relocation expenses, club memberships, private drivers, financial planning, car allowance or Company leased vehicle, home
security, personal apartment costs and long service awards, tax gross ups and contributions to retirement plans. The annual base salaries for 2007 for these officers are determined during the first quarter of 2007.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET OF SURCIGAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 AND THE RELATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE SIX MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000857353
<NAME> SURGICAL TECHNOLOGIES INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                             670
<SECURITIES>                                       500
<RECEIVABLES>                                      670
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                       1720
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  4709
<PP&E>                                            3196
<DEPRECIATION>                                     860
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    8934
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1186
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            43
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                        7704
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      8934
<SALES>                                           2232
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  2232
<CGS>                                             1677
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      773
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (119)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (20)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (99)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (99)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 39 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 39

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 15, 1995

     Received and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding Federal disaster relief.

Whereas catastrophic natural disasters are occurring with greater frequency, a 
        trend that is likely to continue for several decades according to 
        prominent scientists;
Whereas the Federal Government has responded to disasters by appropriating 
        relief funds, which provide only short-term assistance to victims but 
        long-term burdens to taxpayers; and
Whereas the increasing reliance on Federal disaster relief has overshadowed the 
        need to perform more comprehensive disaster planning and rely on private 
        insurance for protection against disaster risks: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) persons who live in areas at high risk to natural 
        disasters should assume more responsibility for their actions 
        by insuring against such risks in order to minimize the rising 
        cost of Federal disaster relief;
            (2) sensible, cost-effective disaster mitigation programs 
        should be encouraged and enhanced at the State and local level;
            (3) insurers should create a privately funded pooling 
        mechanism for the spreading of disaster risk in order to 
        encourage the continued availability and affordability of 
        private insurance in all parts of the Nation; and
            (4) a fundamental overhaul of Federal disaster policies 
        should be undertaken to reduce costs to taxpayers and encourage 
        more effective partnerships between the private sector and 
        government at all levels in anticipation of future 
        catastrophes.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 14, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Copyright © 1997 Global Compliance, LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Basics

Case No: 12-008-U - Flint Creek Retrofit Date Entered: 05/07/2012 12:03:42 PM

Party/Requestor: APSC Staff Date Received: 05/04/2012

Date Requested: 05/04/2012 Internal Due Date: 05/16/2012

Service Due Date: 05/21/2012

Answer Status: New Service Date:

Question No: 19

Regarding Exhibit SCW-5: Please explain why an SCR was assumed necessary in Option 

#2. Specify the environmental regulations that would necessitate SCR, and why SCR was 

chosen over other retrofit options.

Answer:

An SCR was assumed to be required at a gas-converted Flint Creek facility due to the 

need to achieve 

1) US EPA could significantly lower the ozone national ambient air quality standard 

during its next review of this standard in 2013. A lower ozone standard would ultimately 

lead to additional NOx reductions to meet that standard. Additional reductions in NOx 

emissions may also be required by a second phase of the Cross State Air Pollution Rule. 

SCR technology would mitigate this risk.

2) US EPA did not approve Arkansas' Regional Haze SIP for NOx and has directed 

ADEQ to require BART-eligible sources in Arkansas to perform a BART analysis (5 

factor analysis) in which SCR must be included. At the time of filing, it was uncertain 

whether the BART analysis will eliminate SCR as BART and whether EPA would accept 

this analysis if it did eliminate SCR. 

For consistency, note that an SCR was assumed--for modeling purposes only--to be 

included in the retrofit option for largely the same reasons.

Also note also that the cost of the SCR --estimated at approximately only $125/kW, or 

$29 million (SWEPCO share)-- is in-line with the type of SCR tecnology required for a 

gas-fired facility. 

Advanced

Date Verified: Date Accepted:

Confidential: No

Yes

Attachments:
Copyright © 1997 Global Compliance, LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Voluminous: No

Yes

Highly Sensitive: No

Yes

Comments:

Preparer(s): Henry C Steele Witness: Scott C Weaver

Modification History

Created by Scott C Weaver Created on 05/16/2012 10:41:59 AM Modified on 05/18/2012 02:32:47 PM

Edit History

3. Scott C Weaver 05/18/2012 02:32:34 PM

2. Edward J Locigno 05/17/2012 02:51:41 PM

1. Scott C Weaver 05/16/2012 10:51:30 AM
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.6365-2 Commencement and cessation of applicability of subchapter E to individual taxpayers. ( a ) *General rule.* Except for purposes of chapter 24 (relating to the collection of income tax at source on wages), whenever subchapter E begins or ceases to apply to any State (*i.e.*, a State agreement begins or ceases to be effective) as of any January 1, such commencement or cessation of applicability shall apply to taxable years of individuals beginning on or after such date. For example, if subchapter E begins to apply to a particular State on January 1, 1980, it would become applicable for calendar year 1980 for calendar-year taxpayers in that State; but if a taxpayer in the State is using a fiscal year running from July 1 to June 30, the subchapter would begin to apply (except for purposes of chapter 24) to that taxpayer on July 1, 1980, for his taxable year ending June 30, 1981. Similarly, if the subchapter ceases to apply to such State on January 1, 1982, it would cease to apply to calendar-year taxpayers after the end of calendar year 1981; but it would cease to apply (except for purposes of chapter 24) to fiscal-year taxpayers at the end of their fiscal years which are in progress on January 1, 1982. The cessation of applicability of subchapter E to a State does not affect rights, duties, and liabilities with respect to any taxable year for which subchapter E does apply with respect to any taxpayer (or his employer).
( b ) *Special rules pertaining to withholding* — ( 1 ) *Subchapter E beginning to apply.* The Federal withholding system provided in chapter 24 shall go into effect for State individual income tax purposes with respect to wages paid on or after the January 1 as of which subchapter E begins to apply to a State. If an employee is subject to a qualified tax imposed by the State, such withholding system shall apply to his wages paid on or after that January 1, without regard to whether he is a calendar-year or fiscal-year taxpayer. See § 301.6363-3 with respect to transition-year rules.
( 2 ) *Subchapter E ceasing to apply.* The Federal withholding system provided in chapter 24 shall cease to be effective for State tax purposes with respect to wages paid on or after the January 1 as of which subchapter E ceases to apply to the State, although fiscal-year taxpayers of that State continue to be subject to the other provisions of subchapter E for the remainder of their fiscal years then in progress. See § 301.6363-3 with respect to transition-year rules.
[T.D. 7577, 43 FR 59375, Dec. 20, 1978]
#### § 403.45 Re-appraisal of property involved in an allowed petition.

In determining the nature and extent of the relief to be afforded a petitioner pursuant to § 403.44 the value of the property with respect to which the petition has been allowed is the value of such property as determined by the appraisal thereof made pursuant to § 403.26(a)(2) but if the petitioner desires re-appraisal of the property, after notification as to the conditions of allowances of the petition, and makes written request therefor, undertaking in such request to pay, or to be liable for, the total costs of such re-appraisal, the property shall be re-appraised in the manner in which the original appraisal was made, and the conditions of allowance of the petition shall be modified to the extent required by such re-appraisal.
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.7476-1 Declaratory judgments.

See the regulations under section 7476 contained in part 1 of this chapter (Income Tax Regulations) for provisions relating to declaratory judgments, for provisions relating to the qualification of an employee as an “interested party”, and for a requirement that the applicant for an advance determination by the Internal Revenue Service of the qualification of certain retirement plans give notice of such application to interested parties.

[T.D. 7421, 41 FR 20878, May 21, 1976]
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 26, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, November 26, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19I0094. R.L. "BUTCH" CONWAY IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SHERIFF OF GWINNETT COUNTY v. JANISE LATRELL JONES.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 17A09517
#### § 49.4252-1 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14 AND 15d-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 AND SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of First Keystone Financial, Inc. (the
Registrant);
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the
audit committee of Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date:  August 14, 2008
    /s/ Thomas M. KellyThomas M. KellyPresident and Chief Executive Officer
```

[113th Congress Public Law 90]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 128 STAT. 1037]]

Public Law 113-90
113th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To address shortages and interruptions in the availability of propane 
    and other home heating fuels in the United States, and for other 
            purposes. <<NOTE: Mar. 21, 2014 -  [H.R. 4076]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Home Heating 
Emergency Assistance Through Transportation Act of 2014.>> 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Home Heating Emergency Assistance 
Through Transportation Act of 2014'' or the ``HHEATT Act of 2014''.
SEC. 2. PROPANE AND HOME HEATING FUEL EMERGENCY TRANSPORTATION.

    (a) <<NOTE: Termination date. Consultation. Determination.>>  In 
General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a covered 
emergency exemption issued by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety 
Administration shall remain in effect until May 31, 2014, unless the 
Secretary of Transportation, after consultation with the Governors of 
affected States, determines that the emergency for which the exemption 
was provided ends before that date.

    (b) Covered Emergency Exemption Defined.--In this section, the term 
``covered emergency exemption'' means an exemption issued under section 
390.23 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, or extended under 
section 390.25 of such title that--
            (1) was issued or extended during the period beginning on 
        February 5, 2014, and ending on the date of enactment of this 
        Act; and
            (2) provided regulatory relief for commercial motor vehicle 
        operations providing direct assistance supporting the delivery 
        of propane and home heating fuels.

    (c) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in subsection (a) may be 
construed to prohibit the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration 
from issuing or extending a covered emergency exemption beyond May 31, 
2014, under other Federal law.

    Approved March 21, 2014.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4076:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014):
            Mar. 4, considered and passed House.
            Mar. 13, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Properties III
      L.P.
      (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 29, 2008 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Neal Ludeke, Chief Financial Officer of Richman Housing Credits Inc., general
      partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties III L.P., general partner of the
      Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Registrant.




/s/Neal
                LudekeNeal
                LudekeChief
                Financial Officer of RichmanHousing
                Credits Inc., general partnerof
                Richman Tax Credit Properties IIIL.P.,
                General Partner of the RegistrantNovember
                13, 2008
§ 54.9815-2719AT Patient protections (temporary). ( a ) - ( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) *Applicability date.* The provisions of this section are applicable to group health plans and health insurance issuers for plan years beginning before January 1, 2022. *See also* §§ 54.9816-4T through 54.9816-7T, 54.9817-1T, and 54.9822-1T for rules applicable with respect to plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2022.
[T.D. 9951, 86 FR 36950, July 13, 2021]
```

[113th Congress Public Law 88]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 128 STAT. 1019]]

Public Law 113-88
113th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To allow the Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa in the State of 
     Minnesota to lease or transfer certain land. <<NOTE: Mar. 21, 
                         2014 -  [H.R. 2650]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CONGRESSIONAL APPROVAL OF CERTAIN LAND TRANSACTIONS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law 
(including regulations), and without further approval, ratification, or 
authorization by the United States, the Fond du Lac Band of Lake 
Superior Chippewa in the State of Minnesota (referred to in this Act as 
the ``Band'') may lease, sell, convey, warrant, or otherwise transfer 
all or any portion of the interest of the Band in any real property that 
is not held in trust by the United States for the benefit of the Band.
    (b) No Effect on Trust Land.--Nothing in this Act--
            (1) authorizes the Band to lease, sell, convey, warrant, or 
        otherwise transfer all or any portion of any interest in any 
        real property that is held in trust by the United States for the 
        benefit of the Band; or
            (2) affects any Federal law (including regulations) relating 
        to leasing, selling, conveying, warranting, or otherwise 
        transferring any interest in the real property described in 
        paragraph (1).

    Approved March 21, 2014.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2650:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 113-194 (Comm. on Natural Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 159 (2013):
                                    Dec. 3, considered and passed House.
                                                        Vol. 160 (2014):
                                    Mar. 13, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### § 403.56 All bids on unit basis.

All competitive bids shall be on a unit basis. Thus, for example, if a number of forfeited automobiles are advertised for sale at the same date, hour and place, whether or not in the same notice of sale, a separate individual bid is required as to each automobile. The Commissioner or his delegate will not accept one blanket bid to cover the entire group of automobiles offered for sale.