alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 31.3121(e)-1 State, United States, and citizen. ( a ) When used in the regulations in this subpart, the term “State” includes the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, the Territories of Alaska and Hawaii before their admission as States, and (when used with respect to services performed after 1960) Guam and American Samoa.
( b ) When used in the regulations in this subpart, the term “United States”, when used in a geographical sense, means the several states (including the Territories of Alaska and Hawaii before their admission as States), the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands. When used in the regulations in this subpart with respect to services performed after 1960, the term “United States” also includes Guam and American Samoa when the term is used in a geographical sense. The term “citizen of the United States” includes a citizen of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands, and, effective January 1, 1961, a citizen of Guam or American Samoa.
[T.D. 6744, 29 FR 8314, July 2, 1964]
Exhibit
10.18


Description
of Compensation of Non-Employee Directors


Fees
Earned or Paid in Cash


Cash payments to
non-employee directors are made as follows:


1.               Annual Retainer for
all non-employee directors: $25,000


2.               Committee Meeting
Fees: $1,000 per meeting attended (whether attended in-person or by phone)


3.               Annual Chairperson
Fees:


-                    $3,000 for
Nominating and Governance Committee


-                    $5,000 for
Compensation Committee


-                    $10,000 for
Audit Committee


4.               Board Meeting Fees:
$1,500 per meeting attended (whether attended in-person or by phone)


5.               Other:


-                    Lead director —
$10,000 annually (no lead director after August 2006)


-                    Chairman —
$35,000 annually (effective August 2006)


All amounts are paid
quarterly (except as noted). There is no pro-rating for service for less than a
full quarter; service on any committee for part of a quarter is treated the
same as an entire quarter. In addition, from time to time the Board of
Directors forms ad hoc committees and fixes compensation for those committees.


Equity Compensation


Each new
non-employee director receives 5,000 restricted stock units upon becoming a
director.


Each continuing
non-employee director receives 2,500 restricted stock units on the date of the
Board of Directors meeting that directly follows the annual meeting.


Prior to 2006,
each new non-employee director was granted a non-statutory option to purchase
15,000 shares of common stock when the individual became a director, and each
continuing non-employee director was automatically granted an annual non-discretionary,
non-statutory option to purchase 7,500 shares of our common stock on the date
of the Board meeting that directly followed the annual meeting.
IA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 54

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States regarding

federally-mandated expenditures.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 13, 1995

Mr. GILLMOR (for himself, Mr. FRANKS of New Jersey, Mr. COBURN, Mr.

BARTLETT of Maryland, and Mr. LIVINGSTON), introduced the following

joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States regarding federally-mandated expenditures.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission

9 for ratification:
2

•HJ 54 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE —

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. The Congress shall not enact any provi3 sion of law that has the effect of requiring any State or

4 local government to expend non-Federal funds to comply

5 with any Federal law unless the Congress reimburses the

6 State or local government for the non-Federal funds ex7 pended to comply with that Federal law.

8 ‘‘SECTION 2. Section 1 shall not prohibit the Con9 gress from enacting a provision of law that permits a State

10 or local government to choose to expend non-Federal funds

11 in order to receive Federal funds.

12 ‘‘SECTION 3. Sections 1 and 2 shall take effect five

13 years after the ratification of this article.’’.

Æ
§ 1023.670 Summons or subpoena of foreign bank records; termination of correspondent relationship. ( a ) Refer to § 1010.670 of this chapter.
( b ) [Reserved]
#### HENRY W. PEABODY ET AL. v. THE UNITED STATES.

[45 C. Cls. R., 532; 229 U. S. R., 47.]

*On the claimants' appeal.*

The contract requires the contractors to deliver monthly a certain quantity of “ *Wallsend”*coal, and contains the usual clause in Government contracts, that in case of the contractors’ *509failure to deliver, the contracting quartermaster “ *shall have the power to purchase in open marlcet ”*“ *such quantity of coal of equal grade as may he required,” “the difference in cost to he charged to the*contractors.” In consequence of a strike it becomes impossible for the contractors to furnish Wallsend coal, but they are allowed by the contracting quartermaster to furnish an inferior coal at the same price, it being “ *agreed that the same shall he considered as a purchase outside of the contract to meet existing*conditions.” The market value of this inferior coal at the time and place of delivery, owing in part to the strike aforesaid, is $5.15 a ton, which is “ *the price orally- ag.r-eed upon and paid to the contractors ”*by the contracting quartermaster. The contractors subsequently enter into a second contract. The Quartermaster-General decides that the contracting quartermaster could not agree to accept the inferior coal as a purchase outside of the first contract, and he deducts $3,193 from money due on the second contract.

The court below decides:

I. Where a coal contract contains the usual, clause of Government contracts that in case of the contractor’s failure to perform the defendants may purchase in open market, “ *the difference in cost to he charged to the*contractors,” and they furnish an inferior article under an oral agreement with the quartermaster in charge that “ *the same shall he considered as a purchase outside of the contract to meet existing conditions**’ (viz, the impossibility of procuring the coal named in the formal contract because of a strike), and the inferior coal is accepted and paid for, the transaction may be closed; but this will not prevent the defendants from subsequently treating it as a purchase in open márket from a third party and recovering, by way of set-off, not the difference in cost (which is nothing), but the difference in value, which is $3,193.

II. Where contractors obligated themselves to furnish a designated kind of coal they are not released from the obligation, though their inability to perform was the result of a strike in the collieries from which the coal came.

I.II. Set-off may be maintained by the defendants, ip, a suit on a *,*second contract for a liability incurred: by, the claimants in a. former contract, and this though the causes- of action arq distinct.

*510Tbe decision, of tbe court below is affirmed on tbe same grounds.

May 26, 1913.

Mr. Justice Lurton

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court
www.gpo.gov

### §286v. Membership for Taiwan in Fund

It is the sense of the Congress that it is the policy of the United States that Taiwan (before January 1, 1979, known as the Republic of China) shall be granted appropriate membership in the Fund and that the United States Executive Director of the Fund shall so notify the Fund.

(July 31, 1945, ch. 339, §36, as added Pub. L. 96–389, §6, Oct. 7, 1980, 94 Stat. 1554.)

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 7, 1980, see section 12 of Pub. L. 96–389, set out as a note under section 286s of this title.
**Exhibit 32**
     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of PotashCorporation of Saskatchewan Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge,that:
     AmendmentNo. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedMarch 31, 2005 (the “Form 10-Q/A”), ofthe Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Dated:  November18, 2005        /s/WILLIAM J. DOYLE    William J. Doyle    *President and Chief Executive Officer*  
Dated:  November18, 2005        /s/WAYNE R. BROWNLEE    Wayne R. Brownlee    *Senior Vice President, Treasurerand Chief Financial Officer*   
     Theforegoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form10-Q/A pursuant to Item601(6)(32) of Regulation S-K, section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not beingfiled as part of the Form 10-Q/A.
----

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 13 December 2006 — Neophytou v Commission

(Case F-22/05) (1)

(Officials - Open competition - Selection Board - Composition - Equal treatment - Conditions for admission)

(2006/C 331/101)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Neophytos Neophytou (Itzig, Luxembourg) (represented by: S.A. Pappas, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and H. Kraemer, Agents)

Re:

Annulment of the decision of the selection board EPSO/A/1/03 for the constitution of a reserve list of deputy administrators (A8) of Cypriot nationality not to include the applicant on the reserve list drawn up following that competition

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

----

(1)OJ C 155, 25.6.2005 (case initially registered before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities under number T-165/05 and transferred to the European Civil Service Tribunal by order of 15.12.2005).

----
IIA

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1009

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 22, 1996

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

AN ACT

For the relief of Lloyd B. Gamble.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 1009 RFS

1 SECTION 1. APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS.

2 (a) PAYMENT.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall

3 pay, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise ap4 propriated, to Lloyd B. Gamble of Fairfax, Virginia, the

5 sum of $253,488.

6 (b) BASIS.—The payment required by subsection (a)

7 shall be to compensate Lloyd B. Gamble for the injuries

8 sustained by him as a result of the administration to him,

9 without his knowledge, of lysergic acid diethylamide by

10 United States Army personnel in 1957.

11 SEC. 2. SATISFACTION OF CLAIMS.

12 The payment made pursuant to section 1 shall be in

13 full satisfaction of all claims Lloyd B. Gamble may have

14 against the United States for any injury described in such

15 section.

16 SEC. 3. INELIGIBILITY FOR ADDITIONAL BENEFITS.

17 Upon payment of the sum referred to in section 1,

18 Lloyd B. Gamble shall not be eligible for any compensa19 tion or benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs

20 or the Department of Defense for any injury described in

21 such section.

22 SEC. 4. LIMITATION OF AGENTS AND ATTORNEYS FEES.

23 It shall be unlawful for an amount of more than 10

24 percent of the amount paid pursuant to section 1 to be

25 paid to or received by any agent or attorney for any service

26 rendered to Lloyd B. Gamble in connection with the bene-
3

HR 1009 RFS

1 fits provided by this Act. Any person who violates this sec2 tion shall be guilty of an infraction and shall be subject

3 to a fine in the amount provided in title 18, United States

4 Code.

Passed the House of Representatives May 21, 1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.

By LINDA NAVE,

Deputy Clerk.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of American Biogenetic Sciences, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, I, Richard Rubin, CEO, CFO and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Richard Rubin

CEO, CFO and ChairmanDated: February 27, 2006

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to American Biogenetic Sciences, Inc.and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Natasha Benn, Appellant.

[806 NYS2d 211]

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered April 16, 2004, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court upon a finding that she violated two conditions thereof, upon her admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon her previous conviction of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that she was denied her right to due process of law when the County Court failed to hold a hearing with respect to her post-admission arrest is unpreserved for appellate review *(cf. People v Garner,*18 AD3d 669 [2005], *lv denied*5 NY3d 762 [2005]; *People v Stowe,*15 AD3d 597 [2005], *lv denied*5 NY3d 770 [2005]; *People v Potter,*288 AD2d 330 [2001]; *People v Scott P.,*275 AD2d 723 [2000]). In any event, the County Court properly imposed an enhanced sentence based on the defendant’s undisputed violation of another condition of *575her probation, to report any arrest to her probation officer within 24 hours *(see People v Lent,*10 AD3d 457 [2004]; *People v Guerra,*291 AD2d 410 [2002]; *People v Miles,*268 AD2d 489 [2000]).

The defendant’s written waiver of her right to appeal, executed on April 7, 2003, precludes her from arguing on appeal that the amended sentence which the County Court imposed was excessive *(see People v Gorovoy,*309 AD2d 764 [2003]; *People v Pitter,*272 AD2d 416 [2000]; *People v Strunkey,*268 AD2d 492 [2000]). Cozier, J.P., Luciano, Fisher and Covello, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 165 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                             H. J. RES. 165

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1996, and 
                          for other purposes.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 165

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1996, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 104-99 is 
further amended by striking out ``March 22, 1996'' in sections 106(c), 
112, 126(c), 202(c) and 214 and inserting in lieu thereof ``March 29, 
1996'', and that Public Law 104-92 is further amended by striking out 
``March 22, 1996'' in section 106(c) and inserting in lieu thereof 
``April 3, 1996''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 21, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           3,609
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   62,463
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,440)
<INVENTORY>                                     66,613
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               137,802
<PP&E>                                         120,040
<DEPRECIATION>                                (78,220)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 249,018
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          100,536
<BONDS>                                        305,086
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,147
<OTHER-SE>                                   (170,085)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   249,018
<SALES>                                        252,268
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               252,268
<CGS>                                          156,501
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   85,490
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (10,333)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   892
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,348
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,738)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,080
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,818)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,818)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
www.gpo.gov

### §290*o*–6. Effectiveness of Agreement

The Agreement shall have full force and effect in the United States, its territories and possessions, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, upon acceptance of membership by the United States in the Bank and the entry into force of the Agreement.

(Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title I, §101(c) [title VII, §708], Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–121, 3009–180.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         183,213
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,612,228
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  6,042,280
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,085,946
<PP&E>                                       1,469,189
<DEPRECIATION>                                 727,715
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,694,852
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,914,223
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,460,274
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,909,657
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,694,852
<SALES>                                      3,059,185
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,059,185
<CGS>                                        3,198,923
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,198,923
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,284,682
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              94,084
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,349,819)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,349,819)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,349,819)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In re the State of Texas ex rel. * Original Mandamus/Prohibition

Michael Munk, Proceeding

No. 11-14-00268-CV * November 10, 2014

 * Opinion by Bailey, J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

 This court has considered Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and 

petition for writ of prohibition and concludes that the petition for writ of mandamus 

should be conditionally granted in part and that the petition for writ of prohibition 

should be denied. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the petition 

for writ of mandamus is conditionally granted in part. The Honorable Carter T. 

Schildknecht is directed to vacate her order of October 2, 2014, to the extent that the 

order requires the State to conduct criminal history searches of the NCIC/TCIC 

databases. A writ of mandamus will issue only if Judge Schildknecht fails to act by 

November 25, 2014. Relator’s request for a writ of prohibition is denied.