alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 153 (Tuesday, August 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 40170]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19212]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


The Manufacturing Council: Meeting of the Manufacturing Council

AGENCY: International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of a meeting via teleconference.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Manufacturing Council will hold a meeting via 
teleconference to deliberate a draft letter of recommendation to the 
Secretary of Commerce.

DATES: August 25, 2009.
    Time: 11 a.m. (EDT).
    For the Conference Call-in Number and Further Information, Please 
Contact: The Manufacturing Council Executive Secretariat, Room 4043, 
Washington, DC 20230 (Phone: 202-482-4501), or e-mail the Executive 
Secretary at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b7fad6c5d499f4dfdec3c3c2daf7dad6dedb99d3d8d499d0d8c1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f1bc908392dfb299988585849cb19c90989ddf959e92df969e87">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: August 5, 2009.
J. Marc Chittum,
Executive Secretary, the Manufacturing Council.
[FR Doc. E9-19212 Filed 8-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DR-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 34.2**

(logo) pwc

  

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

** **

To the Board of Directors, PNC FinancialServices Group, Inc.:

 

We have examined management’s assertion, included in theaccompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Midland Loan Services, a division ofPNC Bank, National Association (“Midland” or the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forthin Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for all transactions serviced on the *Enterprise!*LoanManagement System (the “Platform”), as of December 31, 2015 and for the year then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii),1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C), 1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), whichthe Company has determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Managementis responsible for the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’sassertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestationstandards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis,evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considerednecessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprisethe Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed thoseselected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedureswere limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to ourtests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report.We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determinationon the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that Midland compliedwith the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 for the Platform is fairlystated, in all material respects.

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

February 25, 2016

 

*PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 1100Walnut Street, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106*

*T: (816) 472 7921, F: (816) 2181890 www.pwc.com/us*
Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement - Richard Hall



 EXHIBIT 10.26 
 January 25, 2007 
 Richard C. Hall 
 4925 Oxford
Drive 
 Sarasota, FL 34242 
  

	 	Re:	Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement 

 Dear Craig: 
 This document is intended to memorialize the amendment of your Employment Agreement, dated June 29, 2006. 
 Our signatures below confirm that we have agreed to modify the Employment Agreement in Section 1 only as described below as follows: 
  

	1.	EMPLOYMENT; DUTIES. 

 The provision, as originally written
has been deleted in its entirety and is amended to read as follows: 
 The Company shall employ Executive as Chief Financial Officer, and Executive accepts
such employment under the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Executive’s duties shall be consistent with those of a Chief Financial officer as defined from time to time by the Company’s board of directors (the
“Board”) and the Chief Executive Officer. 
 APPROVED AND AGREED: 
  


									
	DATE: 1/25/07	  	 	  	 	 	Richard C. Hall
					
		  		  		  		 	 /s/ Richard C. Hall

				
	DATE: 1/25/07	  		  		 	Sun Energy Solar, Inc.
					
		  		  		  		 	 /s/ Carl L. Smith

		  		  		  		 	Carl L. Smith
		  		  		  		 	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
IA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 63

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to provide

that Federal judges be reconfirmed by the Senate every 10 years.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 24, 1995

Mr. FIELDS of Texas introduced the following joint resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States to provide that Federal judges be reconfirmed

by the Senate every 10 years.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission

9 for ratification:
2

•HJ 63 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE—

2 ‘‘Notwithstanding section 1 of article III of this Con3 stitution, a judge or justice of a court created under that

4 article shall not continue in office, except with the consent

5 of the Senate, given within the first 365 days at the begin6 ning of each successive 10-year period after the judge or

7 justice first takes office. For the purposes of this article

8 of amendment, a judge or justice who first took office be9 fore the adoption of this article shall be deemed to have

10 first taken office on the date of such adoption.’’.

Æ
#### Charles J. Rosabella et al., Appellants, v Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al., Respondents.

[804 NYS2d 771]

*366In an action, inter alia, to recover damages under General Municipal Law § 205-e, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Barone, J.), dated April 1, 2004, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

The plaintiff Charles Rosabella, while a police officer in the Village of Port Chester, allegedly was injured when he fell down a staircase at the Port Chester railroad station during the pursuit of a robbery suspect. Rosabella and his wife commenced this action to recover damages under General Municipal Law § 205-e.

In order to prevail on their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, the defendants were required to establish their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by negating at least one essential element of the plaintiffs’ claim *(see Crawford v McBride,*303 AD2d 442 [2003]). The elements of a claim predicated on General Municipal Law § 205-e are a violation by the defendants of a relevant statute, ordinance, or regulation and a practical or reasonable connection between the violation and the injury of the police officer *(see Sconzo v EMO Trans,*295 AD2d 493 [2002]). The defendants successfully negated the plaintiffs’ claim of liability predicated upon a violation of ANSI standards, since those standards do not constitute statutes, ordinances, or regulations within the meaning of General Municipal Law § 205-e *(see Rabinowitz v City of New York,*286 AD2d 724, 724-725 [2001]).

The defendants failed to demonstrate, however, that Rosabella’s accident was not practically or reasonably connected to their failure, over an extended period of time, to maintain the staircase in compliance with former section 765.4 of subchapter B of the New York State Building Code (9 NYCRR), which is a statute, ordinance, or regulation within the meaning of General Municipal Law § 205-e and requires that a staircase landing be “level and true.” Moreover, the defendants did not establish, as a matter of law, that the defendant Metropolitan Transportation Authority is not a proper party to the action. Accordingly, *367the Supreme Court erred, in granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Cozier, J.P., Ritter, Spolzino and Lifson, JJ., concur.
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.6223(h)-1 Responsibilities of pass-thru partner. ( a ) *In general.* The pass-thru partner shall, within 30 days of receiving notice or any other information regarding a partnership proceeding from the Internal Revenue Service, the tax matters partner, or another pass-thru partner, forward a copy of that notice or information to the person or persons holding an interest through the pass-thru partner in the profits or losses of the partnership for the partnership taxable year to which the notice or information relates. In the case of a pass-thru partner that is a partnership within the meaning of section 6231(a)(1), the tax matters partner of such partnership shall forward copies of the notice or information to the partners of such partnership.
( b ) *Effective date.* This section is applicable to partnership taxable years beginning on or after October 4, 2001. For years beginning prior to October 4, 2001, see § 301.6223(h)-1T contained in 26 CFR part 1, revised April 1, 2001.
[T.D. 8965, 66 FR 50551, Oct. 4, 2001]
IA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 31

To amend the Constitution of the United States to provide for balanced

budgets and elimination of the Federal indebtedness.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. JACOBS introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

To amend the Constitution of the United States to provide

for balanced budgets and elimination of the Federal indebtedness.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is hereby proposed as an amendment to the

5 Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to

6 all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

8 States within two years after its submission to the States

9 for ratification:
2

HJ 31 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE—

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. Beginning in fiscal year 1999, the

3 United States government shall not borrow money or any

4 other thing of value except for the purpose of rolling over

5 its existing debt balance, and shall not issue additional

6 currency except as it reflects additional United States

7 productivity.

8 ‘‘SECTION 2. Beginning in fiscal year 2000, and for

9 the next 39 succeeding fiscal years thereafter, the national

debt shall be retired by an amount equal to 21 10 ⁄2 per cen11 tum of the national debt at the beginning of fiscal year

12 2000.

13 ‘‘SECTION 3. The Congress shall have power to en14 force this article by appropriate legislation.’’.

Æ
# Euroopan unionin C 29A/9. h

| | ISSN 1725-2490 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopan unionin
  virallinen lehti | C 29A |
| | |
| Suomenkielinen laitos | Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia | 50. vuosikerta9. helmikuu 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2490

Euroopan unionin

virallinen lehti

C 29A

Suomenkielinen laitos

Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia

50. vuosikerta9. helmikuu 2007

---

| Ilmoitusnumero | Sisältö | Sivu |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Ilmoitukset |
| | HALLINNOLLISET MENETTELYT |
| | Euroopan kemikaalivirasto |
| 2007/C 029A/01 | Ilmoitus avoinna olevasta pääjohtajan toimesta, toimipaikka: Euroopan kemikaalivirasto, Helsinki (palkkaluokka AD 15) | 1 |

Ilmoitusnumero

Sisältö

Sivu

V   Ilmoitukset

HALLINNOLLISET MENETTELYT

Euroopan kemikaalivirasto

2007/C 029A/01

Ilmoitus avoinna olevasta pääjohtajan toimesta, toimipaikka: Euroopan kemikaalivirasto, Helsinki (palkkaluokka AD 15)

1

| FI | |
| --- | --- |

FI

---

V Ilmoitukset

HALLINNOLLISET MENETTELYT

Euroopan kemikaalivirasto

| 9.2.2007 | FI | Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti | CA 29/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2007

FI

Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti

CA 29/1

---

Ilmoitus avoinna olevasta pääjohtajan toimesta, toimipaikka: Euroopan kemikaalivirasto, Helsinki (palkkaluokka AD 15)

(2007/C 29 A/01)

Kemiallisten aineiden sääntely Euroopan unionissa uudistetaan 1 päivänä kesäkuuta 2007 voimaan tulevalla REACH-asetuksella. Olennainen osa asetusta on Euroopan kemikaalivirasto, joka perustetaan Helsinkiin. Kemikaaliviraston vastuulla on hoitaa REACH-asetuksen teknisiä, tieteellisiä ja hallinnollisia näkökohtia ja varmistaa, että asetuksen soveltaminen on johdonmukaista. Viraston tehtävänä on tarjota jäsenvaltioille ja EU:n toimielimille parasta mahdollista tieteellistä ja teknistä ohjeistusta kemikaaleihin liittyvissä kysymyksissä.

Komissio etsii pääjohtajan toimeen henkilöä, joka pystyy johtamaan merkittävää EU:n sääntelyvirastoa sen toiminnan kannalta tärkeinä ensimmäisinä vuosina. Pääjohtajan on myös kyettävä ohjaamaan virastoa sen tieteellisesti, teknisesti ja organisatorisesti haastavassa tehtävässä luoda monitahoinen sääntelyprosessi alalle, joka on poliittisesti arkaluonteinen ja ihmisten terveyden, ympäristön, talouden kilpailukyvyn ja innovaatiotoiminnan kannalta ratkaisevan tärkeä. Hakijoilla olisi oltava osoittaa sekä vankka johtamiskokemus että -taito vastaavalta tieteelliseltä tai tekniseltä toimialalta.

Viraston hallintoneuvosto nimittää pääjohtajan Euroopan komission valitsemien ehdokkaiden luettelosta. Pääjohtaja nimitetään Euroopan yhteisöjen muuhun henkilöstöön sovellettavien palvelussuhteen ehtojen 2 artiklan a alakohdassa tarkoitetuksi väliaikaiseksi toimihenkilöksi palkkaluokkaan AD 15 viiden vuoden ajaksi. Nimitys voidaan uusia kerran enintään viideksi vuodeksi.

Yksityiskohtaisempi hakuilmoitus ja hakulomake ovat seuraavissa osoitteissa:

http://www.ec.europa.eu/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm

ja

http://www.ec.europa.eu/enterprise/reach/prep_jobs_en.htm.

Hakemusten viimeinen jättöpäivä on 23. maaliskuuta 2007.

---
IA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 125

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1996, and for

other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 18, 1995

Mr. OBEY introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Appropriations

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

1996, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 EXTENSION OF CONTINUING AUTHORITY.—Public

4 Law No. 104–31 is amended in section 106(c) by striking

5 out ‘‘November 13, 1995’’ and inserting in lieu thereof

6 ‘‘December 15, 1995’’.

Æ
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

** **

** **

Reference is herebymade to that certain Trust and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 26,2016, by and among J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp. asDepositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Servicer and SpecialServicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administratorand Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee with respect toCommercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2016-NINE (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section13.7 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.           A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from January 1,2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performanceper the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2.           To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day ofFebruary 2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

Leslie Hayton 

Managing Director 

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
Editorial Note on Part 862
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 862 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 862.3700 Propoxyphene test system. ( a ) *Identification.* A propoxyphene test system is a device intended to measure propoxyphene, a pain-relieving drug, in serum, plasma, and urine. Measurements obtained by this device are used in the diagnosis and treatment of propoxyphene use or overdose or in monitoring levels of propoxyphene to ensure appropriate therapy.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). A propoxyphene test system is not exempt if it is intended for any use other than employment or insurance testing or is intended for Federal drug testing programs. The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9, provided the test system is intended for employment and insurance testing and includes a statement in the labeling that the device is intended solely for use in employment and insurance testing, and does not include devices intended for Federal drug testing programs (*e.g.,* programs run by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), the Department of Transportation (DOT), and the U.S. military).
[52 FR 16122, May 1, 1987, as amended at 84 FR 71798, Dec. 30, 2019]
Amendment To Cinergy Corp. 401(K) Excess Plan



 Exhibit 10.67 
  
 AMENDMENT TO 
 CINERGY CORP. 401(K) EXCESS PLAN

  
 The Cinergy Corp. 401(k) Excess Plan (the “Plan”) is
amended, effective as of December 19, 2006, as follows: 

	 	1.	Section 4.2 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following new paragraph (c) at the end thereof: 


	 	“(c)	Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, each phantom unit of Company Stock credited to a Participant’s Account on the Distribution Date shall be converted, as of the
Distribution Date, into phantom units of Spectra Energy Corp common stock and phantom units of Company Stock and reallocated as follows: 


	 	(1)	The number of phantom units of Spectra Energy Corp common stock shall be equal to the number of shares of Spectra Energy Corp common stock to which the Participant would have been entitled on
the Distribution had the phantom units of Company Stock represented actual shares of the Company as of the Record Date, the resulting number of phantom units of Spectra Energy Corp common stock being rounded down to the nearest whole unit.



	 	(2)	The resulting number of phantom units of Spectra Energy Corp common stock shall automatically be transferred from the Company Stock Investment Option and credited to a separate Investment
Option that corresponds to the performance of Spectra Energy Corp common stock (the “Spectra Investment Option”), effective as of the Distribution Date. 


	 	(3)	A Participant may elect, pursuant to rules and procedures prescribed by the Company, to reallocate amounts deemed invested in the Spectra Investment Option into any other open Investment
Option. The Spectra Investment Option shall be closed to additional deferrals and to transfers from any other Investment Option. 


	 	(4)	Capitalized terms used in this Section 4.2(c) that are not defined in this Plan shall have the meaning set forth in the Employee Matters Agreement by and between Duke Energy Corporation
and Spectra Energy Corp.” 


	 	2.	Section 5.1(d) of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following new sub-paragraph (3) at the end thereof: 


	 	“(3)	Spectra Energy Corp Common Stock. The portion of a Participant’s Account that is deemed invested in Spectra Energy Corp common stock at the time of distribution will be
distributed in the form of cash in accordance with rules and procedures prescribed by the Company.” 


	 	3.	Except as explicitly set forth herein, the Plan will remain in full force and effect. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Cinergy Corp. has caused this Amendment to be executed and approved effective as of the date set forth herein. 
  

			
	 By:
	 	 /S/    CHRISTOPHER C.
ROLFE        

		 	Christopher C. Rolfe
		 	Group Executive and Chief
		 	Administrative Officer


  
 Date:
12/19/06
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

August 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
131323 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 131323 COA: 260141 Alcona CC: 02-011054-FC DARYL DOUGLAS JUSTICE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 18, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

p0821 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 29, 2006

Clerk