alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 49.4263-2 Duty to collect the tax in the case of certain refunds. ( a ) *Special rule for collection of tax.* Section 4263(b) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) provides a special rule for the collection of the tax where an unused ticket or order (or portion thereof) purchased without payment of tax is presented for refund and, as a result of the use of only a portion of the transportation purchased in connection with such ticket or order, liability for payment of tax has been incurred. In such a case, the person making the refund shall deduct the amount of the tax due, to the extent available, from the amount which would otherwise be refundable. If the redemption value of the unused ticket or order (or portion thereof) is less than the amount of the tax due on the amount paid for the travel actually performed, the person redeeming the unused ticket or order (or portion thereof) shall make no refund but shall apply the entire amount against the tax due and shall collect any additional tax due or, within 90 days, shall make a report of the amount of the tax remaining uncollected, together with the name and address of the person who sought the refund. The report shall be made to the Commissioner, and a copy of the report shall be furnished to the person presenting the unused ticket or order for redemption.
( b ) *Return of tax.* Any person who has made a collection of tax in accordance with the preceding paragraph shall include such amount in his regular return of taxes required to be collected under section 4291 of the Code.
( c ) *Example.* A carrier receives for redemption a ticket purchased in the United States for transportation from Calgary, Canada, to Edmonton, Canada, which the purchaser bought for use in conjunction with a ticket for nonstop transportation from Seattle to Calgary. The person applying for the refund does not establish to the satisfaction of the carrier that the tax on the Seattle-Calgary ticket has been paid or that the Seattle-Calgary ticket has been redeemed. The carrier, before making any refund for the unused ticket, is required to deduct from the amount otherwise refundable the tax applicable to the amount paid by the purchaser for the transportation from Seattle to Calgary and to report the tax so collected in its quarterly return of Form 720. In the event that the redemption value of the unused Calgary to Edmonton ticket is less than the amount of the tax due on the amount paid for the transportation from Seattle to Calgary, the carrier should not make any refund but should apply against the outstanding tax the entire amount refundable and should either collect the balance of the tax due or make a report, within 90 days, to the Commissioner, setting forth the name and address of the person seeking the refund and the amount of the tax remaining uncollected.
[T.D. 6430, 24 FR 9665, Dec. 3, 1959. Redesignated and amended by T.D. 9948, 86 FR 5007, Jan. 19, 2021]
#### § 1.9003-1 Election to have the provisions of section 613(c) (2) and (4) of the 1954 Code, as amended, apply for past years.

(a) *In general.* Section 4 of the Act of September 14, 1960 (Pub. L. 86-781, 74 Stat. 1017), amended section 302(c) of the Public Debt and Tax Rate Extension Act of 1960 to permit certain taxpayers for taxable years beginning before January 1, 1961, to apply the provisions of section 302(b) of that Act. Section 302(b) of the Act amended section 613(c) (2) and (4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 to read in part as follows:

Sec. 613. *Percentage Depletion.* * * *

(c) *Definition of gross income from property.* For purposes of this section:

---

(2) *Mining.* The term “mining” includes not merely the extraction of the ores or minerals from the ground but also the treatment processes considered as mining described in paragraph (4) (and the treatment processes necessary or incidental thereto), and so much of the transportation of ores or minerals (whether or not by common carrier) from the point of extraction from the ground to the plants or mills in which such treatment processes are applied thereto as is not in excess of 50 miles unless the Secretary or his delegate finds that the physical and other requirements are such that the ore or mineral must be transported a greater distance to such plants or mills.

---

(4) *Treatment processes considered as mining.* The following treatment processes where applied by the mine owner or operator shall be considered as mining to the extent they are applied to the ore or mineral in respect of which he is entitled to a deduction for depletion under section 611:

---

(F) In the case of calcium carbonates and other minerals when used in making cement—all processes (other than preheating of the kiln feed) applied prior to the introduction of the kiln feed into the kiln, but not including any subsequent process;

(b) *Election.* Under section 302(c)(2) of the Act, the taxpayer, in the case of calcium carbonates or other minerals when used by him in making cement, may elect to apply the provisions of section 613(c) (2) and (4) of the 1954 Code as amended in lieu of the corresponding provisions of prior law. The taxpayer must make the election in accordance with § 1.9003-4 on or before November 15, 1960, and the election shall become irrevocable on November 15, 1960.

(c) *Years to which the election is applicable.* If the election described in paragraph (b) of this section is made by the taxpayer, the provisions of section 613(c) (2) and (4) as amended by section 302(b) of the Act apply to all taxable years beginning before January 1, 1961, in respect of which:

(1) The assessment of any deficiency,

(2) Refund or credit of any overpayment,

(3) Commencement of a suit for recovery of a refund under section 7405 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954,

is not prevented on September 14, 1960, by the operation of any law or rule of law. The election also applies to taxable years beginning before January 1, 1961, in respect of which an assessment of a deficiency has been made but not collected on or before September 14, 1960.

[T.D. 6492, 25 FR 8905, Sept. 16, 1960]
#### Karen Appleby et al., Appellants, v William Douglas Evans et al., Respondents.

[804 NYS2d 111]

In an action pursuant to RPAPL article 15 for a judgment declaring the validity of an easement and for a permanent injunction preventing interference with use of the easement, the plaintiffs Karen Appleby and Gareth Hougham appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), entered May 18, 2004, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, declared that the easement was limited solely to use as a pedestrian right-of-way.

Ordered that the appeal by the plaintiff Gareth Hougham is dismissed as academic; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from by the plaintiff Karen Appleby; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the defendants.

“ ‘ “[T]he decision of the fact-finding court should not be disturbed upon appeal unless it is obvious that the court’s conclusions could not be reached under any fair interpretation of the evidence, especially when the findings of fact rest in large measure on considerations relating to the credibility of wit*324nesses” ’ ” *(Thoreson v Penthouse Intl.,*80 NY2d 490, 495 [1992], quoting *Thoreson v Penthouse Intl.,*179 AD2d 29, 31 [1992], quoting *Claridge Gardens v Menotti,*160 AD2d 544, 544-545 [1990]). There is no basis to disturb the Supreme Court’s determination, as the evidence established that the easement in question was intended to afford a right of egress and ingress limited solely to use as a pedestrian right-of-way, and not for vehicular ingress and egress.

The remaining contentions of the appellant Karen Appleby are without merit. H. Miller, J.P., Cozier, Ritter and Dillon, JJ., concur.
H. J. Res. 134

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

Joint Resolution

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1996, and for other

purposes

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SEC. 1. Section 106(c) of Public Law 104–56 is amended by

striking ‘‘December 15, 1995’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘January

26, 1996’’.

SEC. 2. The transmission of this joint resolution to the President

shall be in accordance with the requirements of the concurrent

resolution (H. Con. Res. 131) that establishes procedures making

such transmission contingent upon the submission by the President

of a seven-year balanced budget using the economic and technical

assumptions specified in or consistent with the Congressional

Budget Office Memorandum entitled ‘‘The Economic and Budget

Outlook: December 1995 Update’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 18 (Thursday, January 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 5182]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1944]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-09-003]


Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

Agency Holding the Meeting: United States International Trade 
Commission.

Time and Date: February 5, 2009 at 11 a.m.

Place: Room 101, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

Status: Open to the public.

Matters To Be Considered: 
    1. Agendas for future meetings: None.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Inv. No. 731-TA-1143 (Final) (Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes 
from China)--briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled 
to transmit its determination and Commissioners' opinions to the 
Secretary of Commerce on or before February 18, 2009.)
    5. Outstanding action jackets: None.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    Issued: January 26, 2009.

    By order of the Commission.
William R. Bishop,
Hearings and Meetings Coordinator.
[FR Doc. E9-1944 Filed 1-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
§ 48.4041-14 Exemption for sale to or use by certain aircraft museums. ( a ) *In general.* ( 1 ) The tax imposed by section 4041 does not apply to liquids which are sold for use or used by an aircraft museum in an aircraft or vehicle owned by such museum and used exclusively for the procurement, care, and exhibition of aircraft of the type used for combat or transport in World War II.
( 2 ) In the case of liquid sold for use in an aircraft owned by an aircraft museum and to be used for the pruposes described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, a tax-free sale may be made only if the requirements of § 48.4041-11 are met.
( b ) *Cross reference.* For the definition of aircraft museum, see section 4041(h)(2).
[T.D. 8066, 51 FR 20, Jan. 2, 1986]
**
**Exhibit 34.9**

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

Managing Member 

Park Bridge Lender Services LLC 

New York, NY 

We have examined management’s assertion, included in theaccompanying Management’s Report on Assessment of 2018 Compliance by Park Bridge Lender Services LLC with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria (“Management’s Report”), that Park Bridge Lender Services LLC (the “Company”)complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB (item 1122(d)) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018, excluding those criteria determined by managementand noted as not applicable (N/A) within Exhibit B to Management’s Report. The transactions covered by this report are only those transactions processed by the Company in its capacity as trust advisor or operating advisor for the asset backedsecurities transactions (the “Platform”) identified in Management’s Report. Reference Exhibit A to Management’s Report for the transactions covered by this examination. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliancewith the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria based on our examination. 

We conducted our examination in accordance with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).Those standards require that we plan and perform theexamination to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the Company complied with the applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d). Our examination included tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to the Platform,determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria during the specified period, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Ourprocedures were limited to the selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicing activities related to each asset backed transactionincluded in the Platform. Further an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the Company’s servicingactivities during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. 

In our opinion, management’sassertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria identified in Exhibit B to Management’s Report with respect to the transactions identified in Exhibit A to Management’s Report as of and for the yearended December 31, 2018, for the Platform, is fairly stated, in all material aspects. 

 

/s/ Katz, Sapper & Miller, LLP

New York, New York

February 20, 2019

 
1 

**
§ 303.1-2 Application of part. ( a ) *Property covered.* This part is applicable in connection with property vested in the Attorney General on and after December 18, 1941. It is not applicable in connection with property or interest in property so vested or acquired by the United States prior to December 18, 1941, which property or interest is governed by Treasury Decision 4168, approved June 21, 1928, as amended by Treasury Decision 4254, approved January 7, 1929, and Treasury Decision 4514, approved January 18, 1935 (26 CFR (1938 ed.) 452.1-452.10).
( b ) *Taxes covered.* Except as otherwise provided by specific exemption applicable with respect to the Alien Property Custodian, this part applies in the circumstances therein indicated, to any internal revenue tax applicable in respect of ( 1 ) property vested in the Attorney General or any action or transaction incidental to such property, or
( 2 ) any person whose property is so vested or any action or transaction of such person, whether the tax is applicable in respect of the period of vesting or any other period. Federal employment taxes are applicable with respect to wages paid to a person not a regular Government employee, permanent or temporary, for services immediately connected with the operation of an enterprise under control of the Attorney General such as might be rendered to a private operator.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 125 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 125

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1996, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 18, 1995

Mr. Obey introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1996, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,
    Extension of Continuing Authority.--Public Law No. 104-31 is 
amended in section 106(c) by striking out ``November 13, 1995'' and 
inserting in lieu thereof ``December 15, 1995''.
                                 <all>
```
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

RECO LATRON INGRAM,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D2023-1477

August 30, 2024

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Brett Szematowicz, 

Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Megan Olson, Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison C. Heim, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SLEET, C.J., and CASANEUVA and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Chang
      Hwa
      Commercial Bank, Ji-Cheng Branch

    


    Loan
      Approval Notification

    


    


    
      	
              Client

            	
              Kid
                Castle Internet Technology Corporation

            
	
              Amount
                of Approved Loan

            	
              NT$40,000,000.-

            
	
              Loan
                Category

            	
              1.  Middle-term
                unsecured loan : NT$10,000,000.-

              2.  Middle-term
                unsecured loan : NT$30,000,000.-

            
	
              Term
                of Loan 

            	
              March.
                21, 2005 - March. 31, 2006

            
	
              Interest
                Rate

            	
              1.  Middle-term
                unsecured loan : [Base Lending Rate] + 1.65% (current :
                5.33%)

              2.  Middle-term
                unsecured loan : [Base Lending Rate] + 2.15% (current :
                5.83%)

            
	
              Loan
                Conditions & Supplementary Items

            	
              1.  Re-request
                the Board Resolution of the Executive Board on loan approval
                determination

              2.  Re-request
                loan guarantee and loan agreement of both Pai Suang-Yi and Yang
                Ming-Tan

              3.  Middle-term
                unsecured loan: NT$10,000,000.the period for 3 years; principal and
                interest is paid on a monthly basis

              4.  Middle-term
                unsecured loan : NT$30,000,000.-; the amount of approved loan is
                at 125%
                of bills receivable under control of a special account at the
                Bank

            


    

    Please
      apply for relevant loan processes at the service counter of the Bank, thank
      you.


    


    
 

    Chang
      Hwa
      Commercial Bank, Ji-Cheng Branch

    Dated
      :
      Mar. 28, 2005
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer        Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Amended

Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted), James B. Boyd, the Senior
Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



In
Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 18th day of January, 2008.

|/s/JAMES. B BOYDJames B. Boyd Senior Vice President, Finance
and Chief Financial Officer | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, has been provided to Silicon Storage
Technology, Inc. and will be retained by Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This
certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the
Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

---



QuickLinks
(logo)Newmark Knight Frank

 

 

225Franklin Street

18thFloor

Boston,MA 02110

T877.526.3562

ngkf.com

 

** **

**Officer’sCertificate**

 

 

Pursuant to the requirements of theapplicable Servicing Agreement for the transactions listed on Schedule I hereto,for which Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association,as Master Servicer, and Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/a Newmark Knight Frank,as Primary Servicer, the undersigned, Ronald Steffenino, a Senior ManagingDirector of Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/a Newmark Knight Frank, herebycertifies subject to any limitations listed on Schedule I hereto, as of thedate hereof, solely in his capacity as an officer and not in his individualcapacity, as follows:

 

1. A review of the activities of thePrimary Servicer during the preceding calendar year (the "ReportingPeriod") and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under mysupervision; and

 

2.To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Primary Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 31stday of January, 2020.

 

 

BerkeleyPoint Capital LLC d/b/a

NewmarkKnight Frank

/s/Ronald Steffenino

RonaldSteffenino

SeniorManaging Director,

Servicingand Asset Management

 

 

**Schedule I**

 

CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates; Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/a NewmarkKnight Frank as ***Primary Servicer***:

 

| COMM  2014-CCRE 17 | COMM  2014-CCRE19 |
|--------------------|-------------------|
| GSMS  2014-GC24    | COMM  2014-UBS4   |
| COMM  2015-CCRE23  | COMM  2015 CCRE27 |
| GSMS  2015-GC30    | COMM  2015-LC19   |
| COMM  2015-LC21    | CFCMT  2016-C3    |
| CGCMT  2016-C3     | CFCRE  2016-C7    |
| CCRESG  2016 HEAT  | CCUBS  2017-Cl    |
| CGCMT  2017-C4     | UBS  2017-C5      |
| BMARK  2018 B3     | MSCI  2018 L1     |
| UBS  2018 C12      | UBS  2018 C14     |
| UBS  2018 C8       | UBS  2018 C9      |
| MSCI  2018 H4      | MSCI  2019 L2     |

 

 

BPCd/b/a NKF Primary Servicer for Midland