alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 150 (Thursday, August 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 39338]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18816]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLCAC00000 L07770900 XZ0000]


Notice of Public Meeting of the Central California Resource 
Advisory Council

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Public Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
(FLPMA) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S. 
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Central 
California Resource Advisory Council (RAC) will meet as indicated 
below.

DATES: The meeting will be held Friday and Saturday, Sept. 11 and 12, 
2009, at the Rabobank, 1070 Main St., Cambria, CA. On Sept. 11, the 
members will tour Piedras Blancas Light Station from 9 a.m. to noon. 
There will be a short meeting of the RAC Off-Highway Vehicle Subgroup 
at the Rabobank at 1 p.m., followed by the RAC meeting. Members of the 
public are welcome to attend the tour and meeting. Field tour 
participants must provide their own transportation and lunch. The 
Advisory Council will resume its meeting at 8 a.m. on Sept. 12, at the 
Rabobank. Time for public comment is reserved from 9 a.m. to 10 a.m. on 
Sept. 12.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: BLM Central California District 
Manager Kathy Hardy, (916) 978-4626; or BLM Public Affairs Officer 
David Christy, (916) 941-3146.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 12-member council advises the Secretary 
of the Interior, through the BLM, on a variety of planning and 
management issues associated with public land management in Central 
California. At this meeting, agenda topics will include an update on 
the Resource Management plans for the Carrizo Plain National Monument 
and the BLM Bakersfield Field Office. Additional ongoing business will 
be discussed by the council. All meetings are open to the public. 
Members of the public may present written comments to the council. Each 
formal council meeting will have time allocated for public comments. 
Depending on the number of persons wishing to speak, and the time 
available, the time for individual comments may be limited. Members of 
the public are welcome on field tours, but they must provide their own 
transportation and lunch. Individuals who plan to attend and need 
special assistance, such as sign language interpretation and other 
reasonable accommodations, should contact the BLM as provided above.

    Dated: July 23, 2009.
David Christy,
Public Affairs Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-18816 Filed 8-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-P
Exhibit
32.1




ICONIX
BRAND GROUP, INC.




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF




THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Iconix Brand Group, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”), I, Neil Cole,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Neil ColeNeil
      ColePresident
      and Chief Executive OfficerDate:
      May 5, 2010
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

** **

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Poolingand Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2016, by and among Banc ofAmerica Merrill Lynch Commercial Mortgage Inc, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC asSpecial Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as CertificateAdministrator, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee and ParkBridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor and Asset RepresentationsReviewer with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series2016-C31 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein nototherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. 

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 of theAgreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Servicesdo hereby certify that: 

 

1. A review of the activities of theMaster Servicer during the period from January 1, 2018 through December 31,2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement duringsuch period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based onsuch review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations underthe Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasexecuted this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/LeslieHayton 

LeslieHayton 

ManagingDirector 

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
Second Amendment Agreement to the Administrative Agency Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment
No. 2 to the Administrative Agency Agreement dated as of July 30, 2012, is entered into among UNITED STATES 12 MONTH OIL FUND, LP, a limited partnership organized under the laws of the State of Delaware (the
“Fund”), UNITED STATES COMMODITY FUNDS LLC, formerly Victoria Bay Asset Management, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and General Partner of the Fund (the “General Partner”), and BROWN BROTHERS
HARRIMAN & CO., a limited partnership formed under the laws of the State of New York (“BBH & Co.” or the “Administrator”), 

WITNESSETH: 
 WHEREAS, the Fund, General Partner and BBH & Co. entered into an Administrative Agency Agreement dated as of October 5, 2007 (the “Agreement”); 

WHEREAS, the Agreement was amended by the Fund, General Partner and BBH & Co. as of October 27, 2008; and 

WHEREAS, the Fund, General Partner and BBH & Co. wish to amend the Custodian Agreement; 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, the Fund, General Partner and
BBH & Co. hereby agree as follows: 
  

	 	1.	 Expenses and Compensation. Item 6 of the Agreement “Expenses and Compensation” is deleted in its entirety and replaced
with the following: 


 Expenses and Compensation. For the services to be rendered
and the facilities to be furnished by the Administrator as provided for in this Agreement, the General Partner shall pay the Administrator, a fee based on such fee schedule as may from time to time be agreed upon in writing among the General
Partner, the Fund and the Administrator. Additional services performed by the Administrator as requested by the General Partner on behalf of the Fund shall be subject to additional fees as mutually agreed from time to time. In addition to any such
fees, the Administrator shall bill the General Partner separately for any out-of-pocket disbursements of the Administrator based on an out-of-pocket disbursement schedule as may from time to time be agreed upon in writing among the General Partner,
the Fund and the Administrator. The foregoing fees and disbursements shall be billed to the General Partner for the Fund by the Administrator and shall be paid promptly by wire transfer or other appropriate means to the Administrator. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this Amendment No. 2 to be
duly executed as of the date first above written. 
  

			
	UNITED STATES 12 MONTH OIL FUND, LP
	By:	 	United States Commodity Funds LLC, as General Partner

  

	
	
	 /s/ Howard Mah

	Name: Howard Mah
	Title: Management Director

  

			
	UNITED STATES COMMODITY FUNDS LLC
		
		 	 /s/ Howard Mah

		 	Name: Howard Mah
		 	Title: Management Director

  

			
	BROWN BROTHERS HARRIMAN & CO.
		
		 	 /s/ James R. Kent

		 	Name: James R. Kent
		 	Title: Managing Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAY-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-31-1996
<CASH>                                         5,012
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5,012
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5,012
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          149,922
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       138,534
<OTHER-SE>                                     (283,444)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5,012
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               4,213
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,195)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.00
        


</TABLE>
#### Judith Demant et al., Appellants, v Town of Oyster Bay et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

[804 NYS2d 107]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Jonas, J.), entered May 13, 2004, which granted the respective motions of the defendant Town of Oyster Bay and the defendant Long Island Rail Road for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents.

The plaintiff Judith Demant contends that she was injured when she tripped on a pothole in the parking lot of a diner in Syosset. The defendant Long Island Rail Road (hereinafter the LIRR) established its prima facie entitlement to summary judgment through the submission of evidence establishing that it did not own or maintain the subject parking lot *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]; *Chand v Steuben Hill Mgt. Corp.,*20 AD3d 443 [2005]). The plaintiffs submitted no evidence in opposition to this prima facie showing and the evi*334dence submitted by the defendant Town of Oyster Bay was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557 [1980]). In fact, the deed submitted with the Town’s motion papers supported the LIRR’s entitlement to summary judgment by indicating that the subject premises was conveyed from the LIRR to the Town approximately 49 years before the plaintiffs accident *(see Rinzler v Jafco Assoc., 21*AD3d 360 [2005]; *Termine v Continental Baking Co.,*299 AD2d 406 [2002]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the LIRR’s motion for summary judgment.

The Supreme Court also properly granted the Town’s motion for summary judgment. Town Law § 65-a (1) requires prior written notice as a condition precedent to the maintenance of an action against a town for injuries arising from a defect in a parking lot *(see Bang v Town of Smithtown,*291 AD2d 516 [2002]). The only exceptions to such requirement which have been recognized by the Court of Appeals are when the municipality affirmatively created the defect, or when a special use confers a special benefit on the municipality *(see Amabile v City of Buffalo,*93 NY2d 471, 473 [1999]).

The Town established its entitlement to summary judgment by demonstrating that it did not have prior written notice of the alleged pothole *(see Strauss v Town of Oyster Bay,*201 AD2d 553 [1994]). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Zuckerman v City of New York, supra).*Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, the conclusory and speculative affidavit of their expert failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the Town affirmatively created the pothole *(see Amabile v City of Buffalo, supra; Mollin v County of Nassau, 2*AD3d 600 [2003]; *Leggio v Gearhart,*294 AD2d 543 [2002]; *Arias v City of New York,*284 AD2d 354 [2001]). Goldstein, J.P., Skelos, Fisher and Lunn, JJ., concur.
#### § 0.215 Recording government business.

An employee shall not electronically transmit, or create audio or video recordings of, conversations, meetings, or conferences in the workplace or while conducting business on behalf of the Department, except where authorized.

[82 FR 47106, Oct. 11, 2017]
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.6503(e)-1 Suspension of running of period of limitation; certain powers of appointment.

Where the estate of a decedent is allowed an estate tax charitable deduction under the provisions of section 2055(b)(2) (with respect to property over which the decedent's surviving spouse was given a power of appointment exercisable in favor of charitable organizations) subject to the later disallowance of the deduction if all conditions set forth in section 2055(b)(2) are not complied with, the running of the period of limitation for assessment or collection of any estate tax imposed on the decedent's estate is suspended until 30 days after the expiration of the period for assessment or collection of the estate tax imposed on the estate of the decedent's surviving spouse.
(Superior Court of Cincinnati,

1901.)

#### DREIDAME v. GERMANIA INVESTMENT COMPANY.

(1) A plaintiff may without or against the consent of his counsel voluntarily dismiss a suit brought in behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated; without the others consent, before decree, and before the others come in and are made parties, and -such dismissal will operate as to all parties.'

(2) In such case plaintiff’s counsel has no lien upon exhibits, the property of plaintiff attached to the petition and filed in court, which plaintiff has detached and carried away, and a motion will not lie by him to compel plaintiff to .retain such exhibits.

(1.) Motion to set aside entry of dismissal.

{2.) Motion for leave to file cross-petitions.

(3.) Motion to compel return of exhibits.

Col. Me Clure, for motions.

G. F. Osier, contra.

Dempsey, J.

All denied. Plaintiff, who sued for himself and others who might wish to come in, ignoring his own counsel, and through counsel for the defense, filed a written application to dismiss this case, which was granted. No summons had been returned as y.et, and no appearance of defendant effected in any way. After entry of dismissal, plaintiff, through defendant’s counsel, and without leave of court, detached from the petition and carried away certain exhibits, the property of the plaintiff.

Whatever may be the opinion of the court as to the ethical propriety of the course of practice pursued in this case, the rule has been settled in this state from the earliest times that a plaintiff, individually, has control of his case, and may ignore his counsel, and against counsel’s wishes, settle or dismiss his case. So held by the supreme court, in, 1844, in Dodson v. Riddle, 1 W. L. J., 393, and in Weakly v. Hall, 13 O. R., 167; and in the case of dismissal of the attorney, although his fees be not paid, he has no lien upon the papers filed by him in court, and cannot withdraw them, (Same authorities). So, also, it is held, as a general rule of law that a plaintiff may voluntarily dismiss a proceeding brought in behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated, and without their consent, before decree entered, until they actually come in and are made parties; after they do come in, a voluntary dismissal cannot be had without the consent of all, except that plaintiff may dismiss as to himself, 6 Ency. Pl. *&*Pr., pp. 853-854, title, “Dismissal,” and cases cited.

Under the facts at bar plaintiff’s dismissal operated to get the case out of court not only as to himself, but also as to those whom he purported to represent. As original counsel for plaintiff, under the rules laid down above, would have no lien upon the exihibits detaqhed, 'and as the plaintiff very likely could have obtained leave to substitute copies, it would serve no useful purpose to order them returned, and then grant' leave to withdraw them. Nevertheless, the practice of detaching and removing exhibits from the files, without the leave of court first had, cannot be too strongly condemned.

There is no other course open to the court but to deny the motions of plaintiff’s former counsel which is reluctantly done.
| (logo) NTS NATIONAL

TAX SEARCH, LLC | 130 S. Jefferson, Suite 300

Chicago, IL 60661

312-233-6440 |
|--------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OFCOMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION’S REGULATION AB SERVICINGCRITERIA

 

 

For the calendar year endingDecember 31, 2016, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for **WellsFargo Bank** (the “Servicer”).

 

National Tax Search, LLC(“NTS”) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2016 and forthe period from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the “ReportingPeriod”) with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d)of the Code of Federal Regulations (the “CFR”). NTS has used the servicingcriteria communicated to NTS by the Servicer to assess compliance with theapplicable servicing criteria. Only servicing criteria 1122 (d) (l)(ii), 1122(d)1(iv), 1122 (d)2(ii), 1122 (d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and1122(d)(4)(xii) (the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”) are applicable to theactivities NTS performs with respect to the transactions covered by thisreport. NTS has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth inItem 1122 (d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities itperforms with respect to the transactions covered by this report. Thetransactions covered by this report include all tax payments made on behalf ofthe Servicer using NTS’s TaxQ system (the “Platform Transactions”).

 

NTS, as a vendor, has assessedits compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Periodand has concluded that NTS has complied, in all material respects, with theApplicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2016 and for the ReportingPeriod with respect to the Platform Transactions taken as a whole.

 

Plante& Moran, PLLC, anindependent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation reporton the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as ofDecember 31, 2016 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

 

National Tax Search, LLC, asVendor to Servicer

 

 

/s/ Lori D. Eshoo

Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO 

January 23, 2017
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v *Brian*L. McCarty, Appellant.

[802 NYS2d 639]

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Tioga County (Sgueglia, J.), rendered January 26, 2004, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of driving while intoxicated and bail jumping in the second degree.

In satisfaction of two indictments, defendant pleaded guilty to driving while intoxicated and bail jumping in the second degree and was sentenced to five years of probation and one year in jail, respectively. On appeal, defense counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment as counsel for defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Upon our review of the record, we agree. The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted *(see People v Cruwys,*113 AD2d 979 [1985], *lv denied*67 NY2d 650 [1986]; *see generally People v Stokes,*95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Carpinello, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.
§ 31.6051-2 Information returns on Form W-3 and Social Security Administration copies of Forms W-2. ( a ) *In general.* Every employer who is required to make a return of tax under § 31.6011(a)-1 (relating to returns under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act), § 31.6011(a)-4 (relating to returns of income tax withheld from wages), or § 31.6011(a)-5 (relating to monthly returns) for a calendar year or any period therein, shall file the Social Security Administration copy of each Form W-2 required under § 31.6051-1 to be furnished by the employer with respect to wages paid during the calendar year. An employer may not truncate an employee's social security number to appear in the form of an IRS truncated taxpayer identification number (TTIN) on copies of Forms W-2 filed with the Social Security Administration. Each Form W-2 and the transmittal Form W-3 shall together constitute an information return to be filed with the Social Security Administration as indicated on the instructions to such forms. For the requirement to submit the information on Form W-2 on magnetic media, see section 6011(e) and § 301.6011-2 of this chapter (Procedure and Administration Regulations).
( b ) *Corrected returns.* The Social Security Administration copies of corrected Forms W-2 (or magnetic tape or other approved media) for employees for the calendar year shall be submitted with Form W-3 (or Form 4804), on or before the date on which information returns for the period in which the correction is made would be due under paragraph (a)(3)(ii) of § 31.6071(a)-1, to the Social Security Administration office with which Forms W-2 are required to be filed.
( c ) *Cross references.* For provisions relating to the time for filing the information returns required by this section and to extensions of the time for filing, see sections 6071 and 6081 and the regulations in this part under sections 6071 and 6081. For the penalties applicable to information returns and payee statements, see sections 6721 through 6724 and the regulations in part 301 under sections 6721 through 6724.
( d ) *Applicability date.* This section is applicable for statements required to be filed under section 6051 July 3, 2019.
(68A Stat. 747, 26 U.S.C. 6051; 68A Stat. 917, 26 U.S.C. 7805)
[T.D. 7351, 40 FR 17145, Apr. 17, 1975, as amended by T.D. 7580, 43 FR 60160, Dec. 26, 1978; T.D. 8155, 52 FR 34357, Sept. 10, 1987; T.D. 8344, 56 FR 15042, Apr. 15, 1991; T.D. 8636, 60 FR 66141, Dec. 21, 1995; T.D. 9061, 68 FR 34799, June 11, 2003; T.D. 9861, 84 FR 31720, July 3, 2019]