alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[801 NYS2d 601]

#### In the Matter of Ronald Richard, a Suspended Attorney, Respondent. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Petitioner.

First Department,

October 6, 2005

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Thomas J. Cahill, Chief Counsel, Departmental Disciplinary Committee,*New York City *(Kevin E.F. O'Sullivan*of counsel), for petitioner.

*98
      *Ronald Richard,*respondent pro se.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent Ronald Richard was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the First Judicial Department on April 2, 2001. At all times relevant to this proceeding, he maintained a business office located at Platinum Asset Management in Manhattan.

By corrected order entered October 10, 2003, this Court suspended respondent from the practice of law on an interim basis pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.4 (e) (1) (i) based on his wilful failure to cooperate with the Departmental Disciplinary Committee in its investigation of allegations of professional misconduct against him. Specifically, respondent failed to respond to the Committee regarding a complaint from his client that he failed to provide her with information concerning her investment accounts which he managed pursuant to a durable power of attorney.

The Committee’s notice of motion to suspend specifically stated that, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.4 (g), an attorney who is suspended and has not appeared or applied in writing to the Committee or the Court for a hearing or reinstatement within six months from the date of the order of suspension may be disbarred without further notice. On November 16, 2004, the Committee served respondent with a notice of entry containing a copy of this Court’s October 10, 2003 corrected suspension order.

The Committee now seeks an order disbarring respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.4 (g) on the ground that he has been suspended under 22 NYCRR 603.4 (e) (1) (i) and has not appeared or applied in writing to the Committee or this Court for a hearing or reinstatement for six months from the date of the order of suspension. In addition, the Committee advises that respondent has not filed with the Court or served upon the Committee an affidavit of compliance for a suspended attorney as mandated by 22 NYCRR 603.13 (f). As with the motion to suspend, respondent was served with the instant motion to disbar by mail at his last known home address, but has failed to respond.

Accordingly, inasmuch as more than six months have elapsed since the date of this Court’s order of suspension, and respondent has neither appeared nor applied in writing to the Com*99mittee or this Court for a hearing or reinstatement, the Committee’s motion for an order disbarring respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.4 (g) should be granted, and respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Marlow, Sullivan and Gonzalez, JJ., concur.

Respondent disbarred, and his name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, effective the date hereof.
Directors' Compensation



 Exhibit 10.20 
 Directors’ Compensation 
 Directors who are employees of Duquesne Light Holdings or any of our affiliates are not
compensated for their Board service to Holdings, Duquesne Light or any other affiliate. 
 Directors who are not employees are compensated
for their Board service by a combination of cash and an annual grant of Common Stock. Effective May 25, 2006, the cash component consists of an annual Board retainer of $30,000, payable in twelve monthly installments, and a fee of $1,500 for
each Board, Committee or ad hoc meeting attended. The Audit Committee Chair is paid an additional annual retainer of $3,000. The Board Chair is not compensated for attending Committee meetings. The stock component consists of an annual grant of
2,500 restricted shares or deferred stock units (which vest over two years) for each Director, plus annual grants of stock (which may be deferred in the form of deferred stock units at the recipient’s option) in the following amounts: $30,000
to the Board Chair; $15,000 to the Vice Chair; and $5,000 to each Committee chairperson. Prior to May 25, 2006, the annual retainer was $24,000, the meeting fee was $1,000 and the Audit Committee Chair did not receive an additional retainer;
the other compensation components were not changed. 
 For Directors elected prior to June 1, 2003, we have a Charitable Giving Program
funded by company-owned life insurance policies on the Directors. Upon the death of a Director, we donate up to $500,000, payable in ten equal annual installments, to a maximum of ten qualifying charitable or educational organizations recommended by
the Director and reviewed and approved by the Employment and Community Relations Committee and the Board. A Director must have Board service of 60 months or more in order to qualify for the full donation amount, with service of less than 60 months
qualifying for a pro-rated donation. The program does not result in any material cost to us. 
 We provide Business Travel Insurance to our
non-employee directors as part of our Business Travel Insurance Plan for Management Employees. In the event of accidental death or dismemberment, benefits of up to $400,000 per individual are provided. The program does not result in any material
cost to us. 
 Directors can participate in the Duquesne Light Company College Matching Gift Program, which provides a dollar-for-dollar
match of a gift of cash or securities (up to a maximum of $5,000 per donor per calendar year) to an accredited, nonprofit, non-proprietary, degree-granting college, university, or junior college located within the United States or one of its
possessions which is recognized by the Internal Revenue Service as eligible to receive tax-deductible contributions. The program does not result in any material cost to us.
# L_2019100EN.01000601.xml

| 11.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 100/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 100/6

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2019/575

of 4 April 2019

conferring protection under Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the name ‘Cebreros’ (PDO)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1), and in particular Article 99 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | In accordance with Article 97(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the Commission has examined the application to register the name ‘Cebreros’ sent by Spain and has published it in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In accordance with Article 97(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the Commission has examined the application to register the name ‘Cebreros’ sent by Spain and has published it in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | No statement of objection has been received by the Commission under Article 98 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

No statement of objection has been received by the Commission under Article 98 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.

| (3) | In accordance with Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the name ‘Cebreros’ should be protected and entered in the register referred to in Article 104 of that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In accordance with Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the name ‘Cebreros’ should be protected and entered in the register referred to in Article 104 of that Regulation.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Cebreros’ (PDO) is hereby protected.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 April 2019.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 438, 5.12.2018, p. 2.

2

---
#### In the Matter of Margaret Hiler, Respondent, v Board of Education of the Byron-Bergen Central School District, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

[803 NYS2d 495]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Genesee County (Robert C. Noonan, A.J.), entered July 1, 2004 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The order, inter alia, granted the petition to the extent of directing respondent to provide petitioner copay benefits equivalent to active employees.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs *(see*CPLR 5701 [b] [1]). Present—Green, J.P., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Gorski, JJ.
# L_2019027EN.01001101.xml

| 31.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 27/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 27/11

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) 2019/145

of 30 January 2019

correcting the Dutch language version of Regulation (EU) No 68/2013 on the Catalogue of feed materials

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 767/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on the placing on the market and use of feed, amending European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 and repealing Council Directive 79/373/EEC, Commission Directive 80/511/EEC, Council Directives 82/471/EEC, 83/228/EEC, 93/74/EEC, 93/113/EC and 96/25/EC and Commission Decision 2004/217/EC (1), and in particular Article 26(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The Dutch language version of Commission Regulation (EU) No 68/2013 (2) contains an error in entries 13.8.1 and 13.8.2. in Part C of the Annex as regards the reference to a constituent of a feed material to be declared. The erroneous reference to ‘moisture’ instead of ‘potassium’ affects the scope of certain obligations of the operators. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The Dutch language version of Commission Regulation (EU) No 68/2013 (2) contains an error in entries 13.8.1 and 13.8.2. in Part C of the Annex as regards the reference to a constituent of a feed material to be declared. The erroneous reference to ‘moisture’ instead of ‘potassium’ affects the scope of certain obligations of the operators.

| (2) | The Dutch language version of Regulation (EU No 68/2013 should therefore be corrected accordingly. The other language versions are not affected. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Dutch language version of Regulation (EU No 68/2013 should therefore be corrected accordingly. The other language versions are not affected.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

(does not concern the English language)

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 January 2019.

For the Commission

The President

Jean-Claude JUNCKER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 229, 1.9.2009, p. 1.

1

(2)  Commission Regulation (EU) No 68/2013 of 16 January 2013 on the Catalogue of feed materials (OJ L 29, 30.1.2013, p. 1).

2

---
(logo) GREYSTONE

 

C-III ASSET MANAGEMENT LLCd/b/a

GREYSTONE SPECIAL SERVICING

5221 N. O’Connor Blvd., Suite800

Irving, Texas 75039

Phone: 972-868-5300

Fax: 972-868-5303

 

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

**C-III Asset Management LLC**

 

 

The undersigned, Barry Davis,Vice President of C-III Asset Management LLC, the current Special Servicerunder that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2016relating to the **CSMC 2016-NXSR Commercial Mortgage Trust, Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-NXSR** (the “Pooling and ServicingAgreement”), hereby certifies as follows:

 

1.     a review of the activitiesof the Special Servicer and of its performance under the Pooling and ServicingAgreement during the calendar year 2019 (September 3 – December 31) has beenmade under the undersigned’s supervision;

 

2.     to the best of theundersigned’s knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer hasfulfilled all its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement in allmaterial respects throughout such calendar year 2019, or portion thereof.

 

Capitalized terms nototherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given them in the Pooling andServicing Agreement.

 

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF,** as of the 1st day of March, 2020, I have hereuntosigned my name.

 

 

/s/ Barry Davis

**Barry Davis**, Vice President
Exhibit 34.12



LOGO

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Tothe Board of Directors and shareholders of CoreLogic, Inc.:

We have examined managements assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance, that CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services,
Inc. (the Company), a subsidiary of CoreLogic, Inc. complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB for all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing
customers for which the Company served as the commercial tax service provider (the Platform), as of December 31, 2016 and for the year then ended, only including 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(2)(v), 1122(d)(2)(vi),
1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which the Company has determined are applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Companys
compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assertion based on our examination.

Our
examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company
performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not
designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe
that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2016 for all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the commercial tax service provider is fairly stated, in all material respects.



LOGO

February 6, 2017





PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 1800, Dallas TX 75201-2997

T: 214-746-6500, F: 214-712-6660,www.pwc.com
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 130 (Monday, July 8, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 40690]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-16454]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights

ACTION: Revised Notice of Business Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATE AND TIME: Friday, July 12, 2013; 9:30 a.m. EST

PLACE: 1331 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Suite 1150, Washington, DC 20425

MEETING AGENDA 

I. Approval of Agenda

II. Program Planning

 Approval of Final Draft of 2013 Statutory Enforcement Report
 Discussion re: Proposed Findings and Recommendations for the 
2013 Statutory Enforcement Report
 Status Update on the Sex Trafficking: A Gender-Based Violation 
of Civil Rights Report
 Status Update on the Federal Civil Rights Engagement with Arab 
and Muslim American Communities Post 9/11 Report

III. Management and Operations

 Staff Director's report
 Acting Chief of Regional Programs' report

IV. Approval of State Advisory Committee Appointment Slates

 Kentucky
 Maine
 Minnesota
 New Hampshire
 New York

V. Adjourn Meeting

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT PERSON: Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, 
Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8591.
    Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require 
the services of a sign language interpreter should contact Pamela 
Dunston at (202) 376-8105 or at signlanguage@usccr.gov at least seven 
business days before the scheduled date of the meeting.

    Dated: July 3, 2013.
TinaLouise Martin,
Director of Management/Human Resources.
[FR Doc. 2013-16454 Filed 7-3-13; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
From: "Backfisch Don (NORALNM)" <BackfisD@noralnm.com>

To: Rochelle Boyd/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 01/26/2011 10:16 AM

Subject: RE: Noranda New Madrid, MO Emission Point Coordinates

I have attached a site plan with the emissions points identified.

Don Backfisch

From: Boyd.Rochelle@epamail.epa.gov [ mailto:Boyd.Rochelle@epamail.epa.gov ]

Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 8:51 A M

To: Backfisch Don (NORALNM)

Subject: Re: Noranda New Madrid, MO Emission Point Coordinates

Do you have a diagram to match these emission point id nos.?

Rochelle Boyd, Environmental Engineer

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Sector Policies and Programs Division

109 T.W. Alexander Drive, RTP, NC 27711

Mail Drop D243

- 02

Ph: (919) 541

- 1390 Fax: (919) 541

- 3207

Email: boyd.rochelle@epa.gov

From: "Backfisch Don (NORALNM)" < BackfisD@noralnm.com>

To: Rochelle Boyd/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "Kisner Jeff (NORALNM)" <KisnerJ@noralnm.com>

Date: 01/26/2011 09:35 AM

Subject: Noranda New Madrid, MO Emission Point Coordinates

Rochelle,



### Attached is a file that includes the coordinates for all of our emission points that was

used in some modeling for our recent PSD applica tion. I hope this is the information

you were needing. Let me know if there is anything else you need.

<<Noranda Emission Point Coordinates.xlsx>>



### Don Backfisch

Environmental Superintendent

Noranda Aluminum, Inc.

P. O. Box 70

New Madrid, MO 63869

Phone (573) 643

- 2361 x2126

Fax (573) 643

- 6721
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GILBERTO GOMEZ-COTA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-73289

Agency No. A078-978-274

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 13, 2010** 

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Gilberto Gomez-Cota, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. 

Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of

FILED

SEP 30 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-73289

law. Ram v. INS, 243 F.3d 510, 516 (9th Cir. 2001). We deny in part and dismiss

in part the petition for review.

Gomez-Cota’s contention that the BIA’s order was inadequate fails because

the BIA order contained “a statement of its reasons for denying [Gomez-Cota]

relief adequate for us to conduct our review.” See Ghaly v. INS, 58 F.3d 1425,

1430 (9th Cir. 1995).

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination that

Gomez-Cota failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a

qualifying relative. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.

2005). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Able
Laboratories, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company certify, to the best knowledge and belief of each signatory,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                                       /s/Dhananjay G. Wadekar
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Dhananjay G. Wadekar
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       (Principal Executive Officer)


                                       /s/Robert Weinstein
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Robert Weinstein
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       (Principal Financial Officer)

Date: November 9, 2004