alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Krupp Government Income Trust II (the
"Trust") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas
Krupp, Chairman of the Board of the Trust, certify, pursuant to U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Trust as of March 31, 2003 (the last date of
                  the period covered by the Report).


 /s/ Douglas Krupp
----------------------------
Douglas Krupp,
Chairman of the Board
#### Derrick Vincent REDD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Millard SAILOR, Correctional Officer; Roberto Bryan, Correctional Officer, Defendants-Appellees, and Jane Doe, Nurse, Alexandria Detention Center; Kathleen Robertson, R.N., Defendants.

No. 02-6392.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 30, 2002.

Decided June 6, 2002.

Derrick Vincent Redd, Appellant Pro Se. Jack L. Gould, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Derrick Redd appeals the magistrate judge’s order granting summary judgment to prison officials and dismissing his civil rights complaint.* We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s memo*77randum opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. *See Redd v. Sailor,*No. CA-00-442-AM (E.D. Va. filed Feb, 13, 2002; entered Feb. 14, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*

*

 This case was decided by a magistrate judge exercising jurisdiction upon consent of the parties. 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994).
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>      5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         (108,380)
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   693,922
<ALLOWANCES>                                    182,400
<INVENTORY>                                      98,849
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              2,320,564
<PP&E>                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   79,681
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                4,485,629
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         4,165,831
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                         56,730
<OTHER-SE>                                            0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  4,485,629
<SALES>                                       1,334,444
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              1,334,444
<CGS>                                         1,028,256
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 1,028,256
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              1,375,638
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                3,180
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (1,072,630)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (1,072,630)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (1,072,630)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0



</TABLE>
Exhibit 35.18



|     |  |                                                                                                          
|---- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | Commercial Mortgage Servicing D1050-084, 8th Fl 401 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2016, by and among CCRE COMMERCIAL
MORTGAGE SECURITIES, L.P., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, AEGON USA REALTY ADVISORS, LLC, as Potomac Mills Special Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer with respect to Commercial Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates, CFCRE 2016-C6 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 10.11 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify
that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from November 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such
period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of
February 2017.



LOGO

|                        
|------------------------
|Daniel Bober            
|Executive Vice President
|Wells Fargo Bank        



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
**Exhibit 10.6(a)**     AMENDMENT dated as of August 24, 2007, between AMERICAN COLOR GRAPHICS, INC., a New Yorkcorporation (the “Company”), and KATHLEEN A. DEKAM (the “Executive”).     WHEREAS, the Executive entered an employment agreement with the Company dated as of April 19,2007 (the “Employment Agreement”); and the Company desires to amend the EmploymentAgreement to provide additional incentives for the Executive to remain in the employ of the Companyon the terms and conditions set forth herein, and the Executive desires to continue such employmenton the terms and conditions set forth herein;     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth and forother good and valuable consideration, the parties hereto agree to amend and restate Section 11.7of the Employment Agreement in its entirety as follows:     “11.7. Section 280G. Notwithstanding any other provision herein or any otheremployment, severance, change in control or similar agreement to the contrary, to the extent thatany payment or distribution of any type to or for the benefit of the Executive by the Company orany of its affiliates, whether paid or payable or distributed or distributable pursuant to theterms of this Agreement or otherwise (including, without limitation, any accelerated vesting ofstock options or restricted stock granted by the Company) (collectively, the “TotalPayments”) is or will be subject to the excise tax imposed under Section 4999 of the Code(which reference includes, for purposes of this Agreement, any similar successor provision toSection 4999), then the Total Payments shall be reduced (but not below zero) so that the maximumamount of the Total Payments (after reduction) shall be $1.00 less than the amount that would causethe Total Payments to be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code (such amountby which the Total Payments would thereby be reduced being the “Excess Amount”), unless theExcess Amount is approved by a vote of the eligible shareholders who own more than 75% of thevoting power of all outstanding stock of ACG Holdings, Inc. determined in accordance with theshareholder approval requirements of Section 280G(b)(5)(B) of the Code and the regulationsthereunder, in a vote that complies with such requirements including, without limitation,applicable disclosure requirements. Any reduction to the Total Payments shall be made by reducingany cash severance benefits.”     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be duly executed and theExecutive has hereunto set his hand, as of the day and year first above written.      AMERICAN COLOR GRAPHICS, INC.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

March 24, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 135643 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 135643 COA: 272534 Calhoun CC: 06-001434-FH SHAWNTELL TENNELL BARLOW, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 27, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d0317 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 24, 2008

Clerk
§ 31.3306(c)(16)-1 Services in employ of international organization. ( a ) Subject to the provisions of section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 228), services performed in the employ of an international organization as defined in section 7701(a)(18) are excepted from employment.
( b ) ( 1 ) Section 701(a)(18) provides as follows: Sec. 7701. *Definitions.* (a) When used in this title, where not otherwise distinctly expressed or manifestly incompatible with the intent thereof— (18) *International organization.* The term “international organization” means a public international organization entitled to enjoy privileges, exemptions, and immunities as an international organization under the International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288-288f).
( 2 ) Section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act provides as follows:
Sec. 1. [*International Organizations Immunities Act.*] For the purposes of this title [International Organizations Immunities Act], the term “international organization” means a public international organization in which the United States participates pursuant to any treaty or under the authority of any Act of Congress authorizing such participation or making an appropriation for such participation, and which shall have been designated by the President through appropriate Executive order as being entitled to enjoy the privileges, exemptions, and immunities herein provided. The President shall be authorized, in the light of the functions performed by any such international organization, by appropriate Executive order to withhold or withdraw from any such organization or its officers or employees any of the privileges, exemptions, and immunities provided for in this title (including the amendments made by this title) or to condition or limit the enjoyment by any such organization or its officers or employees of any such privilege, exemption, or immunity. The President shall be authorized, if in his judgment such action should be justified by reason of the abuse by an international organization or its officers and employees of the privileges, exemptions, and immunities herein provided or for any other reason, at any time to revoke the designation of any international organization under this section, whereupon the international organization in question shall cease to be classed as an international organization for the purposes of this title.
#### § 31.6161(a)(1)-1 Extensions of time for paying tax.

No extension of time will be granted for payment of any of the taxes to which the regulations in this part have application.
Exhibit 32.2
                                  ------------


                    Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002
      --------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of HQ Sustainable  Maritime  Industries,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31,  2006,  as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Jean-Pierre Dallaire,  Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: May 15, 2006

 /s/ Jean-Pierre Dallaire
-------------------------
Jean-Pierre Dallaire,
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
#### § 31.3403-1 Liability for tax.

Every employer required to deduct and withhold the tax under section 3402 from the wages of an employee is liable for the payment of such tax whether or not it is collected from the employee by the employer. If, for example, the employer deducts less than the correct amount of tax, or if he fails to deduct any part of the tax, he is nevertheless liable for the correct amount of the tax. See, however, § 31.3402(d)-1. The employer is relieved of liability to any other person for the amount of any such tax withheld and paid to the district director or deposited with a duly designated depositary of the United States.
(logo) Deutsche Bank

1761 East St. Andrew Place

Santa Ana, CA 92705-4934

 

Tel 714 247 6000

Fax 714 247 6009 

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

 

DBJPM 2016-SFC Mortgage Trust

 

The undersigned, dulyauthorized officers of Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as the CertificateAdministrator (a “Certifying Servicer”) under the Trust and ServicingAgreement, dated as of August 1, 2016 (the “Agreement”), by and among, DeutscheMortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Master Servicer, Pacific Life Insurance Company, asSpecial Servicer, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, andDeutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Certificate Administrator, PayingAgent, and Custodian, here by certifies in accordance with Section 11.07 of theAgreement:

 

A)     A review of such CertifyingServicer’s activities from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 (the “reportingperiod”) and of such Certifying Servicer’s performance under the Agreement hasbeen made under such officer’s supervision and 

B)     That, as to the best of suchofficer’s knowledge, based on such review, such Certifying Servicer hasfulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement, in all material respectsduring the reporting period.

 

DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANYAMERICAS

as Certificate Administrator

 

 

/s/ Ronaldo Reyes

BY: Ronaldo Reyes

Title: Vice President

Date: March 1, 2019

 

 

/s/ Karlene Collins

BY: Karlene Collins

Title: Assistant VicePresident

Date: March 1, 2019
#### § 403.29 Deposit of collateral.

Cash, postal money orders, certified or cashiers' or treasurers' checks, and bonds or notes of the United States, or other obligations which are unconditionally guaranteed as to both interest and principal by the United States, may be pledged and deposited by claimants as collateral security in lieu of corporate surety bonds in accordance with the provisions of Treasury Department Circular No. 154, revised (31 CFR part 225).

(Sec. 15, 61 Stat. 650, sec. 7101, 68A Stat. 847, as amended; (6 U.S.C. 15, 26 U.S.C. 7101))
----

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 21 December 2006 — Pantalis v Commission

(Case F-88/06) (1)

(2006/C 331/112)

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register further to an amicable settlement.

----

(1)OJ C 281, 18.11.2006, p. 44.

----
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Charles M.McKenna, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q of Ibis Technology Corporation;

2.             Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

4.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)             designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)            evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

c)             disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):

a)             allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)            anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date: August 14,  2007 |   | /s/ CHARLES M.  MCKENNA, PH.D.        |
|------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                   |   | Charles M. McKenna, PH.D.             |
|                   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
#### In the Matter of Sharon Albee et al., Respondents, v Board of Education of the Byron-Bergen Central School District, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

[803 NYS2d 496]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Genesee County (Robert C. Noonan, A.J.), dated July 1, 2004 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The order, inter alia, granted the petition to the extent of directing respondent to provide petitioners copay benefits equivalent to active employees.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs *(see*CPLR 5701 [b] [1]). Present—Green, J.P., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Gorski, JJ.
EX-10.25 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION AGREEMENT



 





Exhibit 10.25




AGCO CORPORATION DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

(As of February 28, 2007)




	 	 	 
	Annual Base Retainer:

	 	$40,000
	 
	 	 
	Annual AGCO Stock Grant:

	 	Equivalent to $25,000 (based on closing price on day of Annual Meeting)
	 
	 	 
	Board Meeting Fee:

	 	$2,000 per meeting
	 
	 	 
	Telephone Board Meeting Fee:

	 	$1,000 per meeting
	 
	 	 
	Lead Director Fee:

	 	$25,000
	 
	 	 
	Committees:
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	Chairman Annual Retainer:

	 	$10,000 (but $15,000 for Audit)
	 
	 	 
	Member Annual Retainer

	 	$5,000 per committee
	 
	 	 
	Committee Meeting Fee:
	 	 
	Chairman:

	 	$1,500 per meeting
	Phone Meeting:

	 	$1,000 per meeting
	Member:

	 	$1,000 per meeting
	Phone Meeting:

	 	$500 per meeting
To view the full contents of this document, you need a later version of the PDF viewer. You can upgrade to the latest version of Adobe Reader from www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html

For further support, go to www.adobe.com/support/products/acrreader.html
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 104

Providing for an adjournment of the two houses.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 29, 1995

Mr. SHAYS submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

considered and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for an adjournment of the two houses.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legisla3 tive day of Friday, September 29, 1995, it stand ad4 journed until 10 a.m. on Friday, October 6, 1995, or until

5 noon on the second day after Members are notified to reas6 semble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution,

7 whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses

8 or adjourns on any day beginning with Friday, September

9 29, 1995, through Friday, October 6, 1995, pursuant to

10 a motion made by the Majority Leader or his designee in

11 accordance with this resolution, it stand recessed or ad12 journed until noon on Tuesday, October 10, 1995, or until
2

HCON 104 ATH

1 such time on that day as may be specified by the Majority

2 Leader or his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn,

3 or until noon on the second day after Members are notified

4 to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent res5 olution, whichever occurs first.

6 Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority

7 Leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with

8 the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority Lead9 er of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House

10 and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in

11 their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Æ