alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   QUARTER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           2,612
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          22,164
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    158,977
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          13,396
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            12,760
<LOANS>                                        233,018
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,927
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 465,244
<DEPOSITS>                                     275,964
<SHORT-TERM>                                    65,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              8,736
<LONG-TERM>                                     74,660
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            6,531
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,153
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 465,244
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  4,795
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,061
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   161
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 8,017
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,896
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,954
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,063
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      105
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,614
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,120
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,120
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       859
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.41
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.58
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,683
<LOANS-PAST>                                       342
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     2
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,949
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      127
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,927
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,304
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            623


</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.7701-11 Social security number.

For purposes of this chapter, the term *social security number* means the taxpayer identifying number of an individual or estate which is assigned pursuant to section 6011(b) or corresponding provisions of prior law, or pursuant to section 6109, and in which nine digits are separated by hyphens as follows: 000-00-0000. Such term does not include a number with a letter as a suffix which is used to identify an auxiliary beneficiary under the social security program. The terms “account number” and “social security number” refer to the same number.

[T.D. 7306, 39 FR 9947, Mar. 15, 1974]
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Properties III L.P.
(the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 29, 2010 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, David Salzman, Chief Executive Officer of Richman Housing Credits Inc.,
general partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties III L.P., general partner of
the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.




/s/David SalzmanDavid
      SalzmanChief
      Executive Officer of RichmanHousing
      Credits Inc., general partnerof
      Richman Tax Credit Properties IIIL.P.,
      General Partner of the RegistrantNovember
      3, 2010
#### In the Matter of Roshanda D., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[802 NYS2d 620]

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Alma Cordova, J.), entered on or about June 17, 2004, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that she had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of grand larceny in the fourth degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and placed her with the Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490 [1987]). Appellant’s intent to permanently deprive the victim of property could be readily inferred from appellant’s statements and conduct during the incident, including, among other things, her express refusal to give back the property. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Tom, Mazzarelli, Marlow and Catterson JJ.
#### § 54.9816-7T Complaints process for surprise medical bills regarding group health plans (temporary).

*See* 45 CFR 149.150 for the process to receive and resolve complaints that a specific group health plan may be failing to meet the requirement of applying a qualifying payment amount under §§ 54.9816-4T, 54.9816-5T, 54.9816-6T, and 54.9817-1T, which may warrant an investigation.

[T.D. 9951, 86 FR 36950, July 13, 2021]
§ 509.111 Real property income and natural resource royalties. ( a ) *General.* Income of whatever nature derived by a nonresident alien who is a resident of Switzerland, or by a Swiss corporation or other entity, from real property situated in the United States, including gains derived from the sale or exchange of such property, rentals from such property, and royalties in respect of the operation of mines, quarries, or other natural resources situated in the United States, is not exempt from United States tax by the convention. Such items of income are subject to taxation under the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 generally applicable to the taxation of nonresident alien individuals and foreign corporations. See Article IX of the convention. Interest derived from mortgages and bonds secured by real property does not constitute income from real property for purposes of this section but is subject to the provisions applicable to interest generally. See § 509.109.
( b ) *Net basis* — ( 1 ) *General.* Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section, a nonresident alien who is a resident of Switzerland, or a Swiss corporation or other entity, who during the taxable year derives from sources within the United States any income from real property as described in such paragraph may elect for such taxable year to be subject to United States tax on a net basis as though such alien, corporation, or other entity were engaged in trade or business in the United States during such year through a permanent establishment situated therein.
( 2 ) *Manner of electing.* Such nonresident alien (including an individual, fiduciary, and member of a partnership) shall signify his election to be subject to tax on such a basis by filing Form 104B clearly marked at the top of the first page thereof as follows: “Return of Resident of Switzerland Electing to File on a Net Basis Pursuant to Article IX of Swiss Income Tax Convention”. Such corporation shall signify its election to be subject to tax on such a basis by filing Form 1120 clearly marked at the top of the first page there of as follows: “Return of Swiss Corporation Electing to File on a Net Basis Pursuant to Article IX of Swiss Income Tax Convention”. The election so signified shall be irrevocable for the taxable year for which such election is made. All income from sources within the United States, including gains from the sale or exchange of capital assets or of other property, shall be disclosed on the return so filed. See sections 871 and 882 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 and the regulations thereunder.
Order entered August 23, 2013

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 12

- 00154

- CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

V.

TERRANCE GERMAINE WILKINS

, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 6

Dallas County, Texas

T rial Court Cause No. F10

- 62224

- X



### O RDER

The State’s Motion to Rescind the Order of Abatement is DENIED.

/s/ KERRY P. FITZGERALD

JUSTICE
#### § 49.4252-3 [Reserved]
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Re:          Annual Statement of Compliance for JPMDB Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2016-C4Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-C4

 

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of November 1, 2016 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court No. DA 20-0242

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JOURNEY RYDER JOHN WIENKE,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is 

given an extension of time until July 19, 2021 to prepare, file and serve the 

Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 21 2021

06/21/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0242
§ 31.6011(a)-3 Returns under Federal Unemployment Tax Act. ( a ) *Requirement.* Every person shall make a return of tax under the Federal Unemployment Tax Act for each calendar year with respect to which he is an employer as defined in § 31.3306(a)-1. Except as otherwise provided in § 31.6011(a)-8, Form 940 is the form prescribed for use in making the return.
( b ) *When to report wages.* Wages taxable under the Federal Unemployment Tax Act shall be reported in the return required under this section for the return period in which they are actually paid unless they were constructively paid in a prior return period, in which case such wages shall be reported only in the return for such prior period.
( c ) *Time and place for filing returns.* For provisons relating to the time and place for filing returns, see §§ 31.6071 (a)-1 and 31.6091-1, respectively.
[T.D. 6516, 25 FR 13032, Dec. 20, 1960, as amended by T.D. 7200, 37 FR 16544, Aug. 16, 1972]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markm an

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis,

Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk November 3, 2010

p1027 

# Order

November 3, 2010

141333

RACHEL BAKER, Individually and as

Personal Representative of the Estate of

Jonathan Baker, Deceased,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 141333

COA: 289191

Oakland CC: 2007

- 086703

- NF

TRANS

- PORTE, INC.,

Defendant

- Appellant,

and

BRISTOL WEST INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 20, 2010

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be r eviewed by this Court.
IA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 60

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating

to a Federal balanced budget.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 19, 1995

Mr. POSHARD introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States relating to a Federal balanced budget.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission

9 for ratification:
2

•HJ 60 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE—

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. Total outlays of the United States may

3 not exceed total receipts of the United States for that

4 year, unless three-fifths of the whole number of each

5 House of Congress shall provide for a specific excess of

6 outlays over receipts.

7 ‘‘SECTION 2. Total receipts shall include all receipts

8 of the United States except those derived from borrowing

9 or retirement trust funds. Total outlays shall include all

10 outlays of the United States except those for retirement

11 trust funds or repayment of debt principal.

12 ‘‘SECTION 3. Prior to each fiscal year, the President

13 shall transmit to the Congress a proposed budget for the

14 United States Government in which total outlays do not

15 exceed total receipts, consistent with the provisions of this

16 Article.

17 ‘‘SECTION 4. The Congress may waive the provisions

18 of this Article for any fiscal year in which a declaration

19 of war is in effect.

20 ‘‘SECTION 5. All votes taken by the House of Rep21 resentatives or the Senate under this Article shall be roll22 call votes.

23 ‘‘SECTION 6. Congress shall enforce and implement

24 this Article by appropriate legislation.
3

•HJ 60 IH

1 ‘‘SECTION 7. This Article shall take effect for the sec2 ond fiscal year beginning after its ratification, but, if there

3 is a Federal budget deficit for the first fiscal year begin4 ning after its ratification, then, during the next five fiscal

5 years, the annual budget deficit may not exceed the follow6 ing percentums of that budget deficit for each of those

7 years as follows: eighty percentum during the first year

8 to which this Article applies, sixty percentum during the

9 second year, forty percentum during the third year, twenty

10 percentum during the fourth year, and zero percentum

11 during the fifth such year.’’.

Æ
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Douglas Williams, Also Known as Willie Dancy, Jr., Appellant.

[807 NYS2d 752]

Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Michael L. D’Amico, J), rendered July 8, 2003. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon a jury verdict, of murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25 [1]) and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (§ 265.03 [2]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, County Court did not err in refusing to suppress the in-court identifications of defendant by eyewitnesses who had identified him in a photo array. The record establishes that the photo array initially shown to various eyewitnesses did not contain a photograph of defendant. Several eyewitnesses indicated that the perpetrator either was or resembled one of the men depicted in that initial photo array. A second photo array contained defendant’s photograph but not that of the man identified in the initial photo array, and all of the eyewitnesses who made an identification in the second photo array identified *1132defendant as the perpetrator. Defendant contends that the identification procedure was unduly suggestive because the photograph of the man identified in the initial photo array did not appear in the second photo array. We reject that contention. The police did not inform any of the eyewitnesses who had identified the person in the initial photo array that he was not the perpetrator, nor did they suggest that the second photo array contained a photograph of the perpetrator (see *People v Zacharek,*170 AD2d 1008 [1991], *lv denied*77 NY2d 969 [1991]; *cf. People v Payne,*149 AD2d 542 [1989]). “In addition, the potential for irreparable misidentification such as where a witness repeatedly views the same photograph of a defendant until a positive identification results did not exist” under the circumstances of this case *(People v Dunlap,*9 AD3d 434, 435 [2004], *lv denied*3 NY3d 739 [2004]).

Also contrary to defendant’s contentions, the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence *(see generally People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]), and the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Gorski, Smith and Lawton, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350











We, each hereby certify to the best of our knowledge that the Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q of Gateway Tax Credit Fund II, Ltd. for the period ended December 31, 2010 containing the financial statements fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d)) and that information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Gateway.








/s/ Ronald M. Diner

Ronald M. Diner

President

Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc.

(the Managing General Partner)

February 11, 2011/s/ Toni S. Matthews

Toni S. Matthews

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc.

(the Managing General Partner)

February 11, 2011
June 10, 2015

Mr. Terry Camnitz

233 Red Rose Cr. Orlando, FL 32835

Dear Mr. Camnitz:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your May 20, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015- 1837), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 51

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 26, 1996

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress concerning economic

development, environmental improvement, and stability

in the Baltic region.

1 Whereas from 1945 to the early 1990’s Kaliningrad was

2 a Russian military outpost consisting of as many as

3 200,000 Russian military personnel concentrated in

4 an area of 15,000 square kilometers and Kaliningrad

5 has suffered substantial environmental damage as a

6 result of this military presence;
2

HCON 51 RDS

1 Whereas since this time the number of Russian military

2 personnel in Kaliningrad has declined significantly, al3 though the number of such personnel in the region

4 is still substantial;

5 Whereas polls conducted by the Kaliningrad Sociological

6 Center have shown that over 60 percent of the

7 Kaliningrad public favors development of Kaliningrad

8 as an economic bridge between Europe and Russia;

9 Whereas establishment of Kaliningrad as a free economic

10 zone by the Russian Government in 1994 represents

11 a positive step toward Kaliningrad’s integration into

12 the Baltic and European economies and toward giving

13 Kaliningrad an opportunity to flourish economically

14 and to contribute substantially to the well-being of the

15 Baltic region; and

16 Whereas Russian economic analysts at the Russian For17 eign Policy Foundation have noted that militarization

18 of Kaliningrad ‘‘corresponded neither to the needs of

19 the population of the region itself, nor to the neces20 sities of its economic development’’: Now, therefore,

21 be it

22 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

23 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

24 (1) Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia have the

25 right to self-determination which extends to the con-
3

HCON 51 RDS

1 duct of their foreign policy regarding membership in

2 the North Atlantic Treaty Organization;

3 (2) development of the Kaliningrad region as a

4 free trade zone will help ensure the freedom and fu5 ture prosperity and stability of the Baltic region;

6 and

7 (3) continued military reductions in and envi8 ronmental restoration of the Kaliningrad region will

9 greatly facilitate economic development and prosper10 ity in Kaliningrad.

Passed the House of Representatives September 26,

1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00443

- CR

Deborah Ann Brooks a/k/a Deborah

Ann Bradley

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 355th District Court

o f Hood County (CR10794 )

May 28, 2015

Opinion by Justice Walker

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

__ /s/ Sue Walker

___________________ Justice Sue Walker