alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.6226(b)-1 5-percent group. ( a ) *In general.* All members of a 5-percent group shall join in filing any petition for judicial review. The designation of a partner as a representative of a notice group does not authorize that partner to file a petition for a readjustment of partnership items on behalf of the notice group.
( b ) *Effective date.* This section is applicable to partnership taxable years beginning on or after October 4, 2001. For years beginning prior to October 4, 2001, see § 301.6226(b)-1T contained in 26 CFR part 1, revised April 1, 2001.
[T.D. 8965, 66 FR 50553, Oct. 4, 2001]
4~rribune

~ 

NOT)CE Ol~ L16 NEARINGS TO ADOPT 

5ACRAMENTO RE L 8-FtOUR OZOT1E ATTAINMENT AtJD 

REASONABLE ER PRO(3AESS Pt..AN (SM) AND 

FINAL ENVIRON ENTAL IIYIPACT REPOR7 (FEIR) 

The air dlstricts in 3ac(ewtento Federal N"ttainment Area (SFNA) wHl hald public hE 

adoption of the Sacramento Regional 8-Hotr Ozone Attainment and Reasonable Fur1 

(Plan). In addltlon to the Plan adoption, the Sacramento Meuopolitan,alir Quelity Ma 

(SSacMAQMD) wIN consider certlilcation of the Plan's Envir<iesmentai Im Re port. The 

ramento and Yolo counties, and portfong ot Plaoer, ~l Dorado, So~~Sutter crou 

The Plan shows that the region is meetin g requirements of the Clean Air Act for the 1 standard InGudln q meeting minimum emisslpn reduciion progress and reachin p air qualit) 

than 2018. The Plan also will updale the emission inveMory and establish new em 

transportatfeon and generai conformtty. In additfon, the plan makes eommitments to adopt i 

reasonably avell-able control moaeures. 

The Boards of Directors of the air districts In the SFNA wlil conaider the adoption ot L' 

public heari ngs in earty 2009. NOTE: As the lead agency, only the SMAQMD public hE 

¢artfbcatfan of the FEIR. 

~ The public hearings schedvtQ ts listed below. The Plan anif FE1R wlll be avallabie for o 

SMAQMD web site at http:/Mrww.airqualfty.orprcleanairplanfindex.shtml beg inning on Fri 

2008. You may contact your bcal air district to requesi a printed oopy of the Plan and FEII 

By this natic&, ait interested partsos are speclffcaNy raquested to comment on the Plan 1 

wridten testimony may be dtrected to the Alr Distria Board of Direciors at ttro public heay 

district oNic:e, as set torth below: 

Publlc Fieering locetlorts. ~c ~tr>~wlttan Air Qualltp Managb ~ strtct (SMAQMD) 

Sacnamer,to County Board Chambers Steven Lau 

700 H Street, Sacramenio, CA 95814 777 12th Slraet. 3rd Floor, Secrar 

Thursday, January 22. 2009, 8:30 A.M. (918) 874-4834 

Feather Rtver Air Quatiry MarregementUtstrict (FRAOMD) 

Yuba County Govemment Canter Sondra 1lndersson 

915 Bth Streot, Conference Room M1 938 141h Street. Marysville. CA 9F 

MarysviNe. CA 95901 (530) 010,7659 

Monday, February 02, 2009. 4:00 P.M. 

EI Dorado Counfiy Air Quality MAnagemenf Diatrfct (EDCAQMD) 

EI Dorado County Board oi Srrperv;sors' Carptyn Craig 

Mea ' Room 2t1,0 Fal rtane Cajrt , Bldg. C 

,,0 Fa Lane, PlacerviNe, CA, 95887 Ptaoerville, CA 95687 

Tussday. February to, 2009, 9:00 A.M (530) 8¢1-8862 

Yolo-Solano Air Quality Mana gerttent Distrlct (YSAQMD) 

Yolo- Sola Air Quaiiry Managernent Ditr:rtct no Mett.laies 

11947 Galileo Court, Suite 103 , Davis, CA 95818 1 949 Galileo Court, Sulte 103, Da 

Wednesday. February 11. 2009. 9:00 A.M- (530) 757-3650 

Planer County Air Poliution ContrW Districf (PCAPCD) 

Ptaccl County Board o1 Supenrisora Chambere Yu-Stwo Chang 

1T6 FutweHer Avenue8A2~ 

2 3A0 9560

3 

 ~~~A ~3 r Drive, SUe 24 

rnur9day, Fobnrpr (530) 745-2330 

~ Maps and genorai directions are available onitne at 

t` http:/Mrww.atrquOlity.ort,ydeanalrplarYndex_shtml 

JanuarY 

GE~ o

,re, ov 

P«'' ~ 

Signed: 

Date Amount Credit Balance 

01 /05/09 $225.06 $0.00 $225.06
#### Charles A. GEORGE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF PATTON VILLAGE, OFFICER HAUFORD IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 4816, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 85-2860

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 17, 1986.

Charles A. George, pro se.

Chuck Bailey, City Atty., City of Patton Village Mun. Court, Splendora, Tex., for defendant-appellee.

Before REAVLEY, JOHNSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

A few months ago Charles A. George was here contending that the Texas law prohibiting prostitution was unconstitutional. *George v. State of Texas,*788 F.2d 1099 (5th Cir.1986). Now he contends that the 55 mile per hour speed limit is unconstitutional (but not on a two lane two way highway). He argues that all violators are not apprehended and that. enforcement would be unsafe. We find no constitutional issue raised in anything Mr. George says. No more does he have a right to drive over 55 mph guaranteed by the United States Constitution than does he have a *462“right to sex” as urged by his previous appeal. The appeal is frivolous and double costs are awarded pursuant to Fed.R. App.P. 38.

AFFIRMED. DOUBLE COSTS AWARDED.
§ 303.1-1 Definitions. ( a ) *General.* When used in this part, the terms defined in this section shall have the meaning so assigned to them. A term not defined in this section shall have the meaning, if compatible with the context, imputed thereto under the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.
( b ) *Attorney General.* The term “Attorney General” includes the Alien Property Custodian whose functions were transferred to the Attorney General pursuant to Executive Order 9788 (3 CFR 1943-1948 Comp., p. 575), and any other officers and agencies to which such functions are transferred or assigned pursuant to such Executive Order, or otherwise.
( c ) *Commissioner.* The term “Commissioner” means the Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
( d ) *Person.* The term “person” includes an individual, a trust, estate, partnership, company, or corporation, and any entity having or claiming an interest in vested property or liable or charged with liability for internal revenue tax in connection with such property.
( e ) *Former owner.* The term “former owner” means the owner immediately prior to vesting and any successor in interest by inheritance, devise, bequest, or operation of law, of such owner.
( f ) *Trading With the Enemy Act.* The term “Trading With the Enemy Act” includes all amendments of such Act, and all orders, rules, and regulations issued or prescribed under such Act or any such amendment.
( g ) *Property.* The term “property” includes money, the proceeds of property, income, dividends, interest, annuities, and other earnings, but does not include any property or interest or any of the foregoing which vested in the Attorney General or was otherwise acquired by the United States prior to December 18, 1941.
( h ) *Property vested by or in the Attorney General.* The terms “property vested by the Attorney General” and “property vested in the Attorney General” include property conveyed, transferred, assigned, delivered, or paid to or held or controlled by or vested in the Attorney General, under the Trading With the Enemy Act.
( i ) *Engaged in trade or business in the United States.* The term “engaged in trade or business in the United States” includes the managing and renting of real estate in the United States by an agent of the Attorney General or of the former owner duly authorized to execute rental agreements and to pay all taxes and charges incident to the repair and maintenance of such property, but does not include the mere renting or leasing of property under an agreement requiring the lessee or occupant to pay taxes and to make repairs or improvements.
( j ) *Tax.* The term “tax” has the meaning stated in section 36(d) of the Trading With the Enemy Act as added by the Act of August 8, 1946.
§ 1.72-10 Effect of transfer of contracts on investment in the contract. ( a ) If a contract to which section 72 applies, or any interest therein, is transferred for a valuable consideration, by assignment or otherwise, only the actual value of the consideration given for such transfer and the amount of premiums or other consideration subsequently paid by the transferee shall be included in the transferee's aggregate of premiums or other consideration paid. In accordance with the provisions of section 72(g)(3) and paragraph (b) of § 1.72-4, an annuity starting date shall be determined for the transferee without regard to the annuity starting date, if any, of the transferor. In determining the transferee's investment in the contract, the aggregate amount of premiums or other consideration paid shall be reduced by all amounts received by the transferee before the receipt of an amount as an annuity or before the annuity starting date, whichever is the later, to the extent that such amounts were excludable from his gross income under the applicable income tax law at the time of receipt. For the treatment of amounts received by the transferee subsequent to both the annuity starting date and the date of receipt of a payment as an annuity, but not received as annuity payments, see § 1.72-11. For a limitation on adjustments to the basis of annuity contracts sold, see section 1021.
( b ) In the case of a transfer of such a contract without valuable consideration, the annuity starting date and the expected return under the contract shall be determined as though no such transfer had taken place. See paragraph (b) of § 1.72-4. The transferee shall include the aggregate of premiums or other consideration paid or deemed to have been paid by his transferor in the aggregate of premiums or other consideration as though paid by him. In determining the transferee's investment in the contract, the transferee's aggregate amount of premiums or other consideration paid (as so found) shall be reduced by all amounts either received or deemed to have been received by himself or his transferor before the annuity starting date, or before the date on which an amount is first received as an annuity, whichever is the later, to the extent that such amounts were excludable from the gross income of the actual recipient under the applicable income tax law at the time of receipt. For treatment of amounts received subsequent to both the above dates by such transferee, but not received as annuity payments, see § 1.72-11.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Properties III L.P.
(the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 30, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, David Salzman, Chief Executive Officer of Richman Housing Credits Inc.,
general partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties III L.P., general partner of
the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.




/s/David SalzmanDavid
      SalzmanChief
      Executive Officer of RichmanHousing
      Credits Inc., general partnerof
      Richman Tax Credit Properties IIIL.P.,
      General Partner of the RegistrantFebruary
      10, 2010
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 210 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 210

Congratulating the people and leaders of South Africa on the results of 
                    their first democratic election.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                  May 4 (legislative day, May 2), 1994

 Mr. Wofford (for himself, Mr. Simon, Mr. Jeffords, Mr. Moynihan, Mrs. 
     Kassebaum, Mr. Feingold, Ms. Moseley-Braun, Mr. Pell, and Mr. 
DeConcini) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Congratulating the people and leaders of South Africa on the results of 
                    their first democratic election.

Whereas the people of South Africa have demonstrated by their recent election a 
        desire to move toward full democratic government;
Whereas, despite the efforts of extremists, those elections have moved South 
        Africa towards a new era of multiracial cooperation and government;
Whereas President-elect Nelson Mandela, former President F.W. DeKlerk, Chief 
        Mangosuthu Buthelezi, and many others have by their cooperation helped 
        to achieve these good results; and
Whereas the people of South Africa now enter a new and important period in their 
        history: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate, on behalf of the people of the United 
States, hereby extends its congratulations to the people of South 
Africa and their leaders on the results of their first democratic 
election, and expresses the strong hope of all Americans that South 
Africa and its citizens continue on the road to freedom and national 
unity.

                                 <all>
```
February 26, 2013

Mr. Dennis 

### J. DeVany Chief, Essential Air Service Division, 

### X-53 Office ofAviation Analysis EAS@dot.gov

Dear Mr. DeVany:**.--.·~** .·, L-:,: C1**~_]** 

## Chamber of Commerce Convention & 

## Vistors Bureau 302 South Canal Street 

### PO Box 910 Carlsbad, New Mexico 88220 Phone 575-887-6516 Fax 575-885-1455

The Carlsbad Chamber ofCommerce has proudly supported local businesses since 1892. Our Chamber membership consists of hundreds of local businesses, ranging in size from antique shops and barbeque stands to majorcorporations representing the potash, oil and nuclear industries.
Carlsbad's Chamber ofCommerce responsibility is to represent the interests ofour organization's members and we are urging you to support an Essential Air Service (EAS) Contract forthis community offering pressurized flights to both Albuquerque and the Dallas/Fort Worth Metroplex. It is our understanding that Boutique Air offered this combination ofservices in its application to the Department ofTransportation.

Like most individuals and businesses, Carlsbad Chamber members make their travel plans based on necessity, but many do notconsider a non-pressurized flight across one ofthe country's most mountainous statesto be aviable option. The restoration of pressurized service out ofCarlsbad would have asignificant positive impact on our membership. Furthermore, travel options to bothAlbuquerque and DFW Airport would allow members to meettheir diverse business needs on both astate and national level.
The Chamber ofCommerce also supports the effortto bring more retirees to Carlsbad. Our low costs and warm, dry climate make this an attractive destination for Baby Boomers looking for agood place to retire. But air service, especially in the event ofa needed medical procedure, is one ofthe first questions asked by potential retirees. We believe Boutique's plan would significantly enhance our retirement effort.
Carlsbad is a pretty remote place -you'd probably have to go to Alaska to find acommunity in the country more distantfrom any professional sports teams, for example, butwe're also a community with
awide variety ofeconomic needs. On behalfofour members and their economic needs, we respectfully ask you to please consider awarding an EAS contract offering pressurized flights to Albuquerque and Dallas/Fort Worth to Boutique Air.

# 1:i!IAITodd Hyden, Igming Chairman ofthe Board Carlsbad Chamber ofCommerce

Email: info@>carlsbadchamber.com • www.carlsbadchamber.com
----

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/C 313/03)

----
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 36 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 36

    To make majority party appointments to a Senate committee under 
     paragraph 3(c) of rule XXV for the One Hundred Third Congress

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 26 (legislative day, January 5), 1993

 Mr. Mitchell submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    To make majority party appointments to a Senate committee under 
     paragraph 3(c) of rule XXV for the One Hundred Third Congress

    Resolved, That the following shall constitute the majority party's 
membership on the Ethics Committee for the One Hundred Third Congress, 
or until their successors are chosen:
    Select Committee on Ethics: Mr. Bryan (Chairman), Ms. Mikulski, and 
Mr. Daschle.

                                 <all>
```
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Fl  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

** **

Referenceis hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as ofNovember 1, 2016, by and among CREDIT SUISSE COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIESCORP., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as MasterServicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Adminstrator, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Trustee and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as OperatingAdvisor and Asset Representations Reviewer with respect to Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-C7 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuantto Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice Presidentof Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.       Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.       To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilledall of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28thday of February 2018.

 

/s/Daniel Bober

DanielBober

ExecutiveVice President 

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo)  Together we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 32.1    SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    The undersigned officer of Summit Financial Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and in connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 (the Report), that, to such officer's knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.     Date: May 5, 2004J. Randolph Potter, President and Chief Executive Officer     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Summit Financial Corporation and will be retained by Summit Financial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Thomas Keeling *v.*Neuss Floor Covering Company, Inc., et al.

Maltbie, C. J., Avert, Brown, Jennings and Ells, Js.

Argued June 6

decided June 26, 1940.

*Harrison D. Schofield,*for the appellants (defendants).

*Samuel E. Friedman,*with whom was *Samuel J. Tedesco,*for the appellee (plaintiff).

Per Curiam.

Taking the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, the jury could reasonably have found the following facts: He was struck and injured by a truck of the defendant while crossing State Street in Bridgeport at a point some distance from any street intersection or usual crosswalk. He passed between two parked cars and went a foot or two beyond them, looked to the right and left but saw no car approaching. He then proceeded to walk slowly straight across the street without looking again for approaching traffic. When he had proceeded some eighteen feet to a point a little beyond the middle of the street he saw the truck coming toward him from his left, some twenty feet away, and was almost immediately struck by the left front *717of it. The truck had been approaching along the street for some four or five hundred feet, at a speed of fifteen to twenty miles an hour. Its driver did not see the plaintiff until he was within seven or eight feet of him; he then put on his brakes, and while the car skidded slightly, it stopped within four or five feet after striking the plaintiff. After the accident the plaintiff lay on the pavement directly in front of the truck. It was sleeting somewhat at the time. The plaintiff could have seen a car approaching when it was one hundred to one hundred and fifty feet away. The pavement was somewhat slippery. The traffic on the street was heavy at the time, although there was a distance of about two hundred feet between the plaintiff’s truck and the next car ahead of it proceeding in the same direction.

Under these circumstances the jury could reasonably have concluded that the driver of the truck was negligent in not seeing the plaintiff and avoiding the accident, either by stopping his truck or turning it sufficiently to the right to avoid striking him. In crossing the street the plaintiff was bound to exercise a reasonable lookout for approaching traffic, and if no reasonable conclusion were possible other than that the plaintiff when he looked should have seen the truck approaching under circumstances involving a risk of injury to him, he would be guilty of negligence as matter of law. *Paskewicz*v. *Hickey,*111 Conn. 219, 221, 149 Atl. 671; *Puza*v. *Hamway,*123 Conn. 205, 211, 193 Atl. 776. Under the circumstances of this case we cannot say that as matter of law the plaintiff, in the performance of that duty, should have seen the truck when he paused to look for approaching traffic or that, not having seen it, he was guilty of negligence in proceeding without looking again. *Woodhull*v. *Connecticut Co.,*100 Conn. *718361, 365, 124 Atl. 42; *Sinkus*v. *Stein,*112 Conn. 677, 152 Atl. 135; *Skovronski*v. *Genovese,*124 Conn. 482, 483, 200 Atl. 575.

There is no. error.