alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 25.2523(h)-2 Effective dates. Except as specifically provided, in §§ 25.2523(e)-1(c)(3), 25.2523(f)-1(c)(3), and 25.2523(g)-1(b), the provisions of §§ 25.2523(e)-1(c), 25.2523(f)-1, 25.2523(g)-1, and 25.2523(h)-1 are effective with respect to gifts made after March 1, 1994. With respect to gifts made on or before such date, donors may rely on any reasonable interpretation of the statutory provisions. For these purposes, the provisions of §§ 25.2523(e)-1(c), 25.2523(f)-1, 25.2523(g)-1, and 25.2523(h)-1, (as well as project LR-211-76, 1984-1 C.B., page 598, see § 601.601(d)(2)(ii)( b ) of this chapter), are considered a reasonable interpretation of the statutory provisions. In addition, the rule in the last sentence of § 25.2523(e)-1(f)(1) regarding the determination of income under applicable local law applies to trusts for taxable years ending after January 2, 2004. [T.D. 8522, 59 FR 9663, Mar. 1, 1994, as amended by T.D. 9102, 69 FR 21, Jan. 2, 2004]
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 18 (Thursday, January 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 5206]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1928]

[[Page 5206]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Delegation of Authority No. 323]

Re-Delegation From the Deputy Secretary of State of Certain 
Authorities During the Transition Period

    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of State by the 
laws of the United States, and delegated to me by Delegation of 
Authority 245, dated April 23, 2001, I hereby delegate to the following 
officials to the extent authorized by law all authorities vested in the 
specified positions, including all authorities vested in the Secretary 
of State that have been or may be delegated or redelegated to those 
positions:
     To Deputy Assistant Secretary Steven J. Rodriguez, the 
authorities of the Assistant Secretary for Administration.
     To Deputy Assistant Secretary Eliot Kang, the authorities 
of the Assistant Secretary for International Security and 
Nonproliferation.
     To Deputy Spokesman, Robert A. Wood, the authorities of 
the Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs.
     To Deputy Assistant Secretary James L. Millette, the 
authorities of the Assistant Secretary for Resource Management.
     To Deputy Assistant Secretary Karin L. Look, the 
authorities of the Assistant Secretary for Verification, Compliance and 
Implementation.
     To Assistant Chief of Protocol for Diplomatic Affairs, 
Gladys Boluda authorities of the Chief of Protocol.
     To the Deputy Director, Edward Lacey, the authorities of 
the Director of Policy Planning.
     To Ruth E. Bennett, the authorities of the Senior Adviser 
on Women's Empowerment and the Director of the Office of International 
Women's Issues.
     To Nan E. Kennelly, the authorities of the Director of the 
Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons.
    Any authorities covered by this delegation are also hereby 
delegated to the Deputy Secretary for Management and Resources, the 
Under Secretary for Political Affairs and the Under Secretary for 
Management, and may also be exercised by the Secretary and the Deputy 
Secretary. Nothing in this delegation of authority shall be deemed to 
supersede any existing delegation of authority, which shall remain in 
full force and effect during and after this delegation.
    This delegation shall become effective at noon on January 20, 2009, 
and shall expire upon the appointment and entry upon duty in each 
specific case of a subsequently appointed individual to serve in the 
respective position.
    This memorandum shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: January 16, 2009.
John D. Negroponte,
Deputy Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. E9-1928 Filed 1-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
Third Amendment to the NCR Nonqualified Excess Plan effective December 31, 2006



 Exhibit 10.18.3 
 THIRD AMENDMENT 
 TO THE NCR NONQUALIFIED EXCESS PLAN 
 AMENDMENT TO THE NCR NONQUALIFIED EXCESS PLAN (the “Plan”) as restated and in effect January 1, 1996 by NCR Corporation (“NCR”).

 WHEREAS, the Plan was amended and restated effective January 1, 1996, and amended by a First Amendment effective September 1,
2004, to admit no new participants in the Plan and cease benefit accruals for all participants other than a grandfathered group, and a Second Amendment effective January 1, 2006; and 
 WHEREAS, NCR desires to amend the Plan to cease accruals as of December 31, 2006 and to make other technical corrections; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, NCR does hereby amend the Plan, effective December 31, 2006, as follows: 
  

	1.	The first paragraph of Section 3.1, as amended by the First Amendment, is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 

 “3.1 Each Participant (or the Beneficiary of a deceased Participant) shall be entitled to a benefit under this Plan equal to the excess of
(i) the benefit to which he or she would be entitled under the Pension Plan (including the portion of the PensionPlus benefit attributable to years after December 31, 1994, but disregarding the 1985 Minimum Benefit), calculated without
regard to the limitations set forth in Section 415 or Section 401(a)(17) of the Code for years of service after the later of December 31, 1994 or the date participation in the Plan commences, over (ii) the Participant’s
actual benefits from the Pension Plan. For purposes of calculating the benefit, any partial month of service shall count as a whole month, and only compensation earned while participating shall be included. Because the Pension Plan benefit ceased to
accrue effective December 31, 2006, no additional benefit will accrue under this Plan after December 31, 2006, and the calculation of the benefit under this Plan shall be done as of December 31, 2006. Notwithstanding the foregoing
provisions of this paragraph, interest shall continue to be credited to the portion of a Participant’s benefit under this Plan that is based on the Participant’s PensionPlus benefit under the Pension Plan in the same manner as interest
continues to be credited to the Participant’s PensionPlus Account under the pension Plan.” 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, NCR has caused this amendment to the Plan to be executed this 18th day of December, 2006. 
  

			
	FOR NCR CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Bridie Fanning

		 	Bridie Fanning
		 	Senior Vice President, Human Resources
§ 31.3406(d)-2 Payee certification failure. ( a ) *Requirement to backup withhold.* Withholding under section 3406(a)(1)(D) applies to a reportable interest or dividend payment (as defined in section 3406(b)(2)) if, and only if, the payee fails to certify to the payor, under penalties of perjury, that the payee is not subject to withholding due to notified payee underreporting under section 3406(a)(1)(C). The period for which withholding applies is described in § 31.3406(e)-1(e). See § 31.3406(d)-3(a) for special rules when an account is established directly with, or an instrument is acquired directly from, the payor by electronic transmission or by mail. See § 31.3406(c)-1(c)(3)(iv) for rules with respect to a payor's reliance on a payee certification for a new account following notified payee underreporting. See § 31.3406(d)-4 for special rules relating to the acquisition of a readily tradable instrument through a broker. The certificate on which the certification should be made is described in § 31.3406(h)-3.
( b ) *Exceptions.* Withholding under section 3406(a)(1)(D) and paragraph (a) of this section does not apply to reportable interest or dividend payments (as defined in section 3406(b)(2)) made— ( 1 ) With respect to a pre-1984 account (as defined in § 31.3406(d)-1(b)(1));
( 2 ) In a window transaction (as defined in § 31.3406(b)(2)-3(b));
( 3 ) With respect to a readily tradable instrument described in § 31.3406(d)-1(b)(2)(iv) or § 31.3406(d)-4(a)(3); or
( 4 ) During the period and with respect to an account or readily tradable instrument described in § 31.3406(d)-3.
[T.D. 8637, 60 FR 66125, Dec. 21, 1995]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 63 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 63

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
   provide that Federal judges be reconfirmed by the Senate every 10 
                                 years.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 24, 1995

 Mr. Fields of Texas introduced the following joint resolution; which 
             was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
   provide that Federal judges be reconfirmed by the Senate every 10 
                                 years.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Notwithstanding section 1 of article III of this Constitution, a 
judge or justice of a court created under that article shall not 
continue in office, except with the consent of the Senate, given within 
the first 365 days at the beginning of each successive 10-year period 
after the judge or justice first takes office. For the purposes of this 
article of amendment, a judge or justice who first took office before 
the adoption of this article shall be deemed to have first taken office 
on the date of such adoption.''.
                                 <all>
```
|    |                                                                                                                              |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Phillips Edison Grocery Center REIT III, Inc.; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                                                                                               |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                               |
| /s/ Devin I. Murphy                                                                           |
| Devin I. MurphyChief Financial Officer, Treasurer, and Secretary(Principal Financial Officer) |
#### In the Matter of Sanah J., a Child Alleged to be Abused and Neglected. Administration for Children’s Services of City of New York, Appellant; Tamika J. et al., Respondents.

[806 NYS2d 78]

In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the petitioner appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of a fact-finding order of the Family Court, Kings County (Staton, J.), dated December 27, 2004, as, after a fact-finding hearing, in effect, dismissed so much of the petition as alleged that the respondents had abused the subject child.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and the facts, without costs or disbursements, that branch of the petition which alleged that the respondents abused the subject child is reinstated, that branch of the petition is sustained, and the matter is remitted to Family Court, Kings County, for a dispositional hearing in accordance herewith; and it is further,

Ordered that pending the issuance of an order of disposition by the Family Court, Kings County, the subject child shall remain in the petitioner’s custody and shall not be removed from her current foster home.

The petitioner made out a prima facie case of abuse against the respondents by introducing evidence demonstrating that while the subject child was in their care, she suffered severe injuries that would not ordinarily occur absent an act or omission of the respondents (see Family Ct Act § 1046 [a] [ii]; *Matter of Philip M.,*82 NY2d 238, 243 [1993]). Indeed, the petitioner presented proof that the child, who was three months old, sustained 11 rib fractures, a fractured arm and leg, cerebral edema, retinal hemorrhaging, a subdural bilateral hematoma, and bruises (see *Matter of Infinite G.,*11 AD3d 688 [2004]; *Matter of Sharonda S.,*301 AD2d 532 [2003]; *Matter of Brandon C.,*247 AD2d 380 [1998]; *Matter of Christopher C.,*219 AD2d 519 [1995]).

*386The Family Court properly concluded that the respondents, who provided no reasonable explanation for the injuries, failed to rebut the evidence of parental culpability (see *Matter of Philip M., supra*at 244; *Matter of Infinite G., supra*at 689). However, while the Family Court found that the child was neglected, under the circumstances, the Family Court should have found that she was abused *(see*Family Ct Act § 1012 [e] [i]). Accordingly, based on our review of the entire record, we so find (see *Matter of Aniyah F.,*13 AD3d 529 [2004]; *Matter of Nyomi A.D.,*10 AD3d 684 [2004]; *Matter of New York City Dept. of Social Servs. v Carmen J.,*209 AD2d 525 [1994]). Florio, J.P., Goldstein, Fisher and Covello, JJ., concur.
----

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions at its meeting on given at its 407th meeting on 18 April 2006 concerning a draft decision relating to Case COMP/C.38.620 Hydrogen Peroxide and Perborate

(2006/C 303/18)

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Mutaquim Moses, Appellant.

[804 NYS2d 242]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce Allen, J.), rendered April 8, 2003, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 15 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Since defendant did not raise the issue by specific objection, his present claim that there was insufficient evidence to corroborate the testimony of an accomplice is unpreserved *(People v Gray,*86 NY2d 10 [1995]), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence. Police testimony, photographs and physical evidence linked defendant to the crime and fully satisfied the accomplice corroboration requirement *(see*CPL 60.22 [1]; *People v Besser,*96 NY2d 136, 143 [2001]; *People v Breland,*83 NY2d 286, 292-293 [1994]). We also conclude that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility *(see People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94 [1903]). Although only the accomplice testified as to the actual drug transaction, police testimony as to events before and after the transaction warranted the jury’s finding that defendant was a participant and not a spectator. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Friedman, Sullivan and Malone, JJ.
US
Bank(logo)



| | Global
    Corporate Trust          
| | ------------------------------------
| | 190
    S. LaSalle Street, 7th Floor
| | MK-IL-SL7C                          
| | Chicago,
    IL 60603               
| |                                     
| | usbank.com                          



Annual
Statement of Compliance

Morgan
Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2015-C25



VIA:
EMAIL



Banc
of America Merrill Lynch Commercial Mortgage Inc.



One
Bryant Park



New
York, New York 10036



Attention:
Leland F. Bunch, III



leland.f.bunch@baml.com



OWS
Administration, LLC



c/o
One William Street Capital Management, LP



299
Park Avenue, 25thFloor



New
York, NY 10171



Email:
Legal@owslp.com





17g5informationprovider@usbank.com



| | Re: | Pooling
                                         and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2015 (the “Agreement”)
                                         between Banc of America Merrill Lynch Commercial Mortgage Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo
                                         Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of
                                         PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Trust
                                         Advisor and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Certificate Administrator, Certificate
                                         Registrar, Authenticating Agent and Custodian.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



I,
Kimberly O. Jacobs, a Senior Vice President of U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator, as a certifying servicer
hereby certify that:



(1)
A review of the activities of the Certificate Administrator during the preceding calendar year (the “Reporting Period”)
and of the performance of the Certificate Administrator under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and



(2)
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Certificate Administrator has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement
in all material respects throughout such Reporting Period.



Capitalized
terms used but not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.



Date:
February 28, 2022



U.S.
Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator



|By: | /s/
    Kimberly O. Jacobs | 
|--- | -------------------------- | 
|    | Kimberly O. Jacobs         | 
|    | Senior Vice President      |
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.7604-1 Enforcement of summons. ( a ) *In general.* Whenever any person summoned under section 6420(e)(2), 6421(f)(2), or 7602 neglects or refuses to obey such summons, or to produce books, papers, records, or other data, or to give testimony, as required, application may be made to the judge of the district court or to a U.S. commissioner for the district within which the person so summoned resides or is found for an attachment against him as for a contempt.
( b ) *Persons who may apply for an attachment.* The officers and employees of the Internal Revenue Service whom the Commissioner has designated to carry out the authority given him by § 301.7602-1(b) to issue a summons are authorized to apply for an attachment as provided in paragraph (a) of this section.
[32 FR 15241, Nov. 3, 1967, as amended by T.D. 7297, 38 FR 34803, Dec. 19, 1973]
Certifications

I, Richard Simpson, certify that:


1.	I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2016-C3 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);


2.	Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.	Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;


4.	Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and


5.	All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.


In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association; Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC; Fintech Trust Advisors LLC DBA CRED iQ; Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas; Berkeley Point Capital LLC; Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; Computershare Trust Company, National Association; LNR Partners, LLC; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC; CoreLogic Solutions, LLC; Greystone Servicing Company LLC;and Wilmington Trust, National Association.

Date:	March 31, 2023

/s/ Richard Simpson ___________________Richard SimpsonPresident, Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)

CGCMT 2016-C3 Certifications

---