alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.6863-2 Collection of jeopardy assessment; stay of sale of seized property pending Tax Court decision. ( a ) *General rule.* In the case of an assessment under section 6851, 6852, 6861, or 6862, any property seized for the collection of such assessment shall not (except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section) be sold until the latest of the following occurs: ( 1 ) The period provided in section 7429(a)(2) to request the district director to review the action taken expires.
( 2 ) The period provided in section 7429(b)(1) to file an action in U.S. District Court expires if a request for a redetermination is made to the district director.
( 3 ) The U.S. District Court judgment in such action becomes final, if a civil action is begun in accordance with section 7429(b).
( 4 ) In addition to the occurrences described in paragraphs (a), (1), (2), and (3) of this section, in the case of an assessment of income, estate, gift, chapter 41, 42, 43, or 44 excise taxes, until the latest of the following occurs: ( i ) The expiration of the period provided in section 6213(a) within which the taxpayer may file a petition with the Tax Court; or
( ii ) The decision of the Tax Court becomes final, if a petition for redetermination is filed with the Tax Court (whether before or after the making of the assessment). However, notwithstanding paragraph (a)(4)(i) of this section, in the case of a termination assessment under section 6851, property seized may be sold after the due date (determined with extensions) of the taxpayer's return if the taxpayer does not file a return by such date. Furthermore, for the purposes of paragraph (a)(4)(ii) of this section, a petition will not operate as a further stay of the sale of the seized property unless the taxpayer files a bond as provided in section 7485.
( b ) *Exceptions.* Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section, any property seized may be sold— ( 1 ) If the taxpayer files with the district director a written consent to the sale, or
( 2 ) If the district director determines that the expenses of conservation and maintenance of the property will greatly reduce the net proceeds from the sale of such property, or
( 3 ) If the property is of a type to which section 6336 (relating to sale of perishable goods) is applicable.
[32 FR 15241, Nov. 3, 1967, as amended by T.D. 7575, 43 FR 58817, Dec. 18, 1978; T.D. 8628, 60 FR 62213, Dec. 5, 1995]
S erved: April 22 , 2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, DC

------------------------------------------------------------ 

### WEST ISLE AIR, INC.

-----------------------------------------------------------



### NOTICE OF REGISTRATION OF TRADE NAME

On March 22 , 2014

, West Isle Air, Inc. (“ West Isle ”)

, a U.S. c ommuter air carrier, 1 request ed that

the Department regist e r the trade name “ Chelan Seaplanes” for use in certain of its air transportation

operations and deregister its previous trade name “San Juan Airlines.”

In support of its request, West Isle states that on February 21 , 2014, the air carrier h a d sold , among

other assets, its trade name “San Juan Airlines” to Rugby Aviation

, LLC (“Rugby”)

, a U.S

commuter air carrier based in Northwest Washington

. 2 In addition, West Isle states that the Federal

Aviation Administration has already removed the “ San Juan Airlines ” trade name in th e air carrier’s

O perati ons S pecifications

.

Part 215 (14 CFR Part 215) of the Department’s regulations provides that any air carrier wishing to

use an alternative trade name must first register that name with the Department. The rule further

states that the Department may register such name after the air carrier gives notification to similarly

named air carriers of the proposed use of the name. In this case, the name “ Chelan Seaplanes” is

not currently being used by, nor is identical or similar to the name of, any other existing certificated,

commuter, or foreign air carrier.

Since West Isle has complied with the requirements of Part 215, we acknowledge the registration of

the trade name “ Chelan Seaplanes ” for immediate use in its operations. We also deregister the trade

name “San Juan Airlines.”

Dated at Washington, D.C.

, April 22 , 201 4

.

TODD M. HOMAN

Directo r

Office of Aviation Analysis

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at:

http:// www.regulations.gov

1 See Order 1992

- 5

- 3

, issued on May 18, 1992

. 2 See Order 2010

- 4

- 4 , issued on April 9, 2010. The Department consequently registered the trade name “San Juan

Airlines” for use in Rugby’s operations ( See Notice of Trade Name Registration for Rugby Aviation, LLC

, dated March

24, 2014 )

.Attachment A

SE RVICE LIST FOR WEST ISLE AIR, INC.

MR CLYDE CARLSON

MR SHANE CARLSON

WEST ISLE AIR, INC.

4000 AIRPORT ROAD, SUITE A

ANACORTES WA 98221 OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION

DOT/RSPA/BTS E

- 36

1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE

WASHINGTON DC 20590

MR LOUIS A JANSEN

OWNER, RUGBY AVIATION, LLC

4167 MITCHELL WAY

BELLINGHAM WA 98226 MR MARK MAZOR

CERTIFICATION MANAGE R

FAA AFS

- 900

45005 AVIATION DRIVE SUITE 131

DULLES VA 20166

MR CHIP PETERSON

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

PRINCIPAL OPERATIONS INSPECTOR

SEATTLE WA 89511 MR PETER LYNCH

ASST CHIEF COUNSEL FOR ENFORCEMENT

FAA/AGC

- 300

800 INDEPENDENCE AVE SW

WASHINGTON DC 20591
Exhibit 10.2 

On June 11, 2008, Encorium Group, Inc. (“Encorium”) entered into a term sheet with Fine Success Investments, Ltd., a British Virgin Islands company doing business as Linkcon (“Linkcon”) andChardan Capital, LLC (“Chardan”), pursuant to which, subject to certain conditions, Chardan will procure a loan for Encorium in the amount of $5,000,000 (the “Loan”) to make partial payment for the acquisition of PrologueResearch International, in exchange for a promissory note from Encorium (the “Note”). Although the terms of the Note are not fully finalized, it is currently expected that it will be senior unsecured debt, bear interest at 10% and includewarrants to purchase 500,000 shares of common stock of Encorium at an exercise price of $1.80 per share. It is also anticipated that principal and accrued interest on the Note will be payable upon the earlier of the consummation of Encorium'santicipated merger with Linkcon or 12 months from the date of the Note.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of HQ Sustainable Maritime Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Norbert Sporns, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002, to
the best of his knowledge, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: July 1, 2008



/s/ Norbert SpornsNorbert SpornsChief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.9


 


AMENDMENT TO INDUSTRIAL BUILDING LEASE


 


UNIQUE BUILDING
CORPORATION, as Lessor, and ZEBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, as Lessee, hereby
agree to amend that Industrial Building Lease dated May 15, 1989
pertaining to the property commonly known as 333 Corporate Woods Parkway,
Vernon Hills, Illinois, as follows:


 


1.     In consideration of improvements made by the Lessor consisting
of a 25,200 square foot expansion of manufacturing space and an 11,500 square
foot expansion of office space, the monthly rental payable pursuant to the
terms and conditions of the said Lease shall be increased according to the
following table on the dates indicated:


 


	
  Description

  	
   

  	
  Beginning

  	
   

  	
  and Ending

  	
   

  	
  Rent Shall Be Increased By

  
	
  25,200 sq. ft. factory

  	
   

  	
  Apr 1, 1993

  	
   

  	
  Mar 31, 1998

  	
   

  	
  $14,700

  
	
  11,500 sq. ft. office

  	
   

  	
  Aug 15. 1993

  	
   

  	
  Mar 31, 1998

  	
   

  	
  $6,700

  
	
  Office and factory

  	
   

  	
  Apr 1, 1998

  	
   

  	
  Mar 31, 2003

  	
   

  	
  $25,690

  



 


2.     The effective date of this Amendment shall be April 1, 1993.


 


3.     Except as they may have been modified by anything set forth in
this Amendment, all of the terms and provisions of the said Lease are hereby
ratified and confirmed by the parties hereto as being in full force and effect.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties hereto have sat their hands and seals this 1st day of April 1993.


 


	
  ZEBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION,

  	
  UNIQUE BUILDING CORPORATION,

  
	
  Lessee

  	
  Lessor

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Gerhard Cless

  	
   

  	
  Edward Kaplan

  
	
   

  	
  Secretary

  	
   

  	
  President
#### § 1.959-4 Distributions to United States persons not counting as dividends.

Except as provided in section 960(a)(3) and § 1.960-2, any distribution to a United States person which is excluded from the gross income of such person under section 959(a)(1) and § 1.959-1 shall be treated for purposes of chapter 1 (relating to normal taxes and surtaxes) of subtitle A (relating to income taxes) of the Code as a distribution which is not a dividend. However, see paragraph (b)(1) of § 1.956-1, relating to the dividend limitation on the amount of a controlled foreign corporation's investment of earnings in United States property.

[T.D. 7120, 36 FR 10860, June 4, 1971]
EXHIBIT 99.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Mark B. Cox, Chief Financial Officer of Giant Industries, Inc.
("Giant"), do hereby certify that: (a) the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of Giant for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 (the "Form
10-Q") to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (b) the information contained in
the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Giant.

Giant Industries, Inc.


By:  /s/ MARK B. COX
-------------------------------
Name:   Mark B. Cox
Title:  Chief Financial Officer

Date:   May 14, 2003.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 16 Introduced in House (IH)]

                                     

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 16

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                  relating to voluntary school prayer.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

Mr. Emerson (for himself and Mr. Hansen) introduced the following joint 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                  relating to voluntary school prayer.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is hereby proposed as 
an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution if 
ratified by the legislatures of at least three-fourths of the several 
States within seven years from the date of its proposal to the States 
by the Congress:

                              ``Article--

    ``Nothing in this Constitution shall be construed to prohibit 
individual or group prayer in public schools or other public 
institutions. No person shall be required by the United States or by 
any State to participate in prayer. Neither the United States nor any 
State shall prescribe the content of any such prayer.''
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 241 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 241

   To amend rule XVI of the Standing Rules of the Senate relating to 
            amendments to appropriation bills in the Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 13 (legislative day, July 11), 1994

Mr. Byrd submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                 Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   To amend rule XVI of the Standing Rules of the Senate relating to 
            amendments to appropriation bills in the Senate.

    Resolved, That paragraph 4 of rule XVI of the Standing Rules of the 
Senate is amended by--
            (1) inserting ``as passed by the House or as reported to 
        the Senate,'' after ``contained in the bill'';
            (2) striking ``relevancy of amendments under this rule'' 
        and inserting ``relevancy or germaneness of amendments under 
        this paragraph'';
            (3) striking ``submitted to the Senate and be decided 
        without debate'' and inserting ``ruled on by the chair'';
            (4) inserting ``(a)'' after ``4.''; and
            (5) adding at the end thereof the following:
    ``(b)(1) An affirmative vote of three-fifths of the Senators, duly 
chosen and sworn, shall be required to overturn a ruling of the Chair 
regarding questions of germaneness, relevancy, or legislation under 
this paragraph.
    ``(2) This paragraph may be waived with respect to an amendment by 
the affirmative vote of three-fifths of the Senators, duly chosen and 
sworn.''.
                                 <all>
```
III

★(Star Print)

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 230

To designate and assign two permanent Senate offices to each State.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 20 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Mr. WOFFORD submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Rules and Administration

RESOLUTION

To designate and assign two permanent Senate offices to

each State.

1 Resolved, That (a) effective on January 3, 1995, the

2 Committee on Rules and Administration shall begin to

3 designate two permanent offices for each State.

4 (b) The designation of permanent offices shall be ac5 complished—

6 (1) in a manner consistent with the current

7 rules and practices of the Senate; and

8 (2) in the most efficient and cost-effective man9 ner practicable.
2

SRES 230 IS1S

1 (c) Not later than June 30, 1995, each State shall

2 be designated two permanent offices for the Senators from

3 such State.

4 (d) Each Senator upon taking office shall be assigned

5 a permanent office designated to the State that the Sen6 ator represents.

7 (e) Effective December 31, 1995, no funds appro8 priated to the Senate shall be used for the purpose of mov9 ing a Senator from the office to which the Senator has

10 been assigned.

11 (f) All funds saved by the implementation of this res12 olution shall be dedicated to deficit reduction.

Æ
§ 31.3121(a)(5)-1 Payments from or to certain tax-exempt trusts, or under or to certain annuity plans or bond purchase plans. ( a ) *Payments from or to certain tax- exempt trusts.* The term “wages” does not include any payment made— ( 1 ) By an employer, on behalf of an employee or his beneficiary, into a trust, or
( 2 ) To, or on behalf of, an employee or his beneficiary from a trust. If at the time of such payment the trust is exempt from tax under section 501(a) as an organization described in section 401(a). A payment made to an employee of such a trust for services rendered as an employee of the trust and not as a beneficiary thereof is not within this exclusion from wages.
( b ) *Payments under or to certain annuity plans.* ( 1 ) The term “wages” does not include any payment made after December 31, 1962— ( i ) By an employer, on behalf of an employee or his beneficiary, into an annuity plan, or
( ii ) To, or on behalf of, an employee or his beneficiary under an annuity plan, if at the time of such payment the annuity plan is a plan described in section 403(a).
( 2 ) The term “wages” does not include any payment made before January 1, 1963— ( i ) By an employer, on behalf of an employee or his beneficiary, into an annuity plan, or
( ii ) To, or on behalf of, an employee or his beneficiary under an annuity plan, if at the time of such payment the annuity plan meets the requirements of section 401(a)(3), (4), (5), and (6).
( c ) *Payments under or to certain bond purchase plans.* The term “wages” does not include any payment made after December 31, 1962— ( 1 ) By an employer, on behalf of an employee or his beneficiary, into a bond purchase plan, or
( 2 ) To, or on behalf of, an employee or his beneficiary under a bond purchase plan,
if at the time of such payment the plan is a qualified bond purchase plan described in section 405(a). [T.D. 6876, 31 FR 2596, Feb. 10, 1966]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 118 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 118

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1996, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 10, 1995

Mr. Obey introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1996, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That section 106(c) of Public 
Law 104-31 (109 Stat. 280) is amended by striking ``November 13, 1995'' 
and inserting ``December 13, 1995''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 1.317-1 Property defined.

The term *property,* for purposes of part 1, subchapter C, chapter 1 of the Code, means any property (including money, securities, and indebtedness to the corporation) other than stock, or rights to acquire stock, in the corporation making the distribution.
IV

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 156

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding research on the human

papillomavirus and its relation to cervical cancer.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 27, 1996

Ms. DELAURO submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Commerce

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding research

on the human papillomavirus and its relation to cervical

cancer.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that in

3 conducting research relating to the prevention and detec4 tion of cervical cancer, the Director of the National Cancer

5 Institute and the Director of the National Institute of Al6 lergy and Infectious Diseases should collaborate in spon7 soring basic and clinical research on human

8 papillomavirus diagnosis and prevention as a risk of cer-
2

•HCON 156 IH

1 vical cancer, and as applicable, develop screening tech2 niques accordingly.

Æ
§ 302.1-2 Application of regulations. ( a ) *Property covered.* The regulations in this part are applicable in connection with property vested in the Attorney General pursuant to section 202 (a) of the Act and in connection with the net proceeds of any property described under section 202(b) of such Act which was vested in the Attorney General after December 17, 1941, pursuant to the Trading With the Enemy Act, as amended (40 Stat. 411).
( b ) *Taxes covered.* The regulations in this part are applicable to any internal revenue tax with respect to ( 1 ) property vested in the Attorney General or any action or transaction incidental to such property, or
( 2 ) any person whose property is so vested or any action or transaction of such person, whether the tax is applicable in respect of the period of vesting or any other period.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Stanley R. Ivy, Appellant.

[803 NYS2d 458]

Appeal from a judgment of the Genesee County Court (Robert C. Noonan, J.), rendered June 12, 2003. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of rape in the first degree (two counts), attempted sodomy in the first degree (two counts) and sexual abuse in the first degree (two counts).

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him following a jury trial of two counts each of rape in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.35 [1], [3]), attempted sodomy in the first degree (§§ 110.00, former 130.50 [1], [3]) and sexual abuse in the first degree (§ 130.65 [1], [3]). Defendant failed to renew his motion to dismiss with respect to count three of the indictment and thus waived his present contention that the evidence of forcible compulsion is legally insufficient to support his conviction under that count *(see People v Hines,*97 NY2d 56, 61 [2001], *rearg denied*97 NY2d 678 [2001]). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention concerning the alleged legal insufficiency of the evidence of forcible compulsion with respect to counts one and five of the indictment *(see People v Gray,*86 NY2d 10, 19 [1995]). We reject defendant’s further contention that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence *(see generally People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present—Green, J.P., Gorski, Smith, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.