alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Covalent Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth M. Borow, M.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Kenneth M. Borow, M.D.           
|Kenneth M. Borow, M.D.               
|President and Chief Executive Officer



August 12, 2005



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes
 Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



24
Morgantown Municipal Airport 

100 Hart Field Road 

Morgantown, West Virginia 26505 

MUNICIPAL AIRPORT 

Jackie R. Marhefka 

Airport Director 

jmarhefka@cityofmorgantown.org 

June 19, 2014 

Mr. Scott Faulk 

Transportation Industry Analyst 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

EAS & Domestic Analysis Division 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Mr. Faulk: 

(304) 291-7461 

www.morgantownairport.com 

For the past two years, Silver Airways Inc. consistently has demonstrated poor reliability and 

performance. Passengers have repeatedly experienced dozens of flight cancellations and 

hours-long delays that resulted in cancellations, all of which have led to the significant 

dwindling of MGW's enplanements and this community's trust and support. This low level of 

service is not acceptable and if it continues, we will request our air service be rebid early. 

I support Silver Airways, Inc. to provide commercial air service at Morgantown Municipal 

Airport (MGW) with daily roundtrip flights to Dulles International Airport (lAD) on the nonnegotiable condition that the company provides superior reliability and performance 

consistently to this community throughout the duration of its two-year EAS contract. Please 

recommend to the Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs that Silver 

Airways, Inc. be selected as the air carrier for this airport as we feel we have no other viable 

option. 

Morgantown Municipal Airport historically has maintained a strong, loyal passenger base that 

wants and, more importantly, deserves superior, reliable commercial air service to a primary 

hub that will best meet its needs and desires and ultimately restore the community's trust in 

this airport. 

Respectfully, 

~·~ Jackie R. Marhefka 

Director 

Morgantown Municipal Airport
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Wells Fargo CommercialMortgage Securities, Inc.

375 PARK AVE FL 2

Wells Fargo Securities, LLC

NEW YORK, New York 10152-0002

 

Re:          Annual Statement of Compliance for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities,Inc., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-NXS4

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of December 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 54

Commending President Bush on conclusion of the START II Treaty.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 2 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 1993

Mr. MCCAIN (for himself, Mr. DOLE, and Mr. LUGAR) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

RESOLUTION

Commending President Bush on conclusion of the START

II Treaty.

Whereas on January 3, 1993, President George Bush and

President Boris Yeltsin signed the Treaty on Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms

(START II);

Whereas, as a result of the implementation of the START I

and START II treaties, the immediate threat of nuclear

war will be reduced by creating a more stable mix of nuclear weapons between the world’s two foremost nuclear

powers;

Whereas the START treaties will eliminate heavy ICBMs and

multiple-warhead ICBMs, weapons which have long been

the most destabilizing weapons associated with the EastWest arms race;
2

•SRES 54 IS

Whereas the threat of a first strike in the event of renewed

hostilities with the former Soviet Union would be greatly

reduced;

Whereas nuclear weapons remain a central element of United

States force structure and an essential element of its national security;

Whereas the START II Treaty allows the United States to

maintain its nuclear triad with a more stable mix of

weapons while maintaining United States security in the

event of political instability in Russia; and

Whereas the START II Treaty continues the stringent verification regime of the first START agreement, thereby

reducing the risk of conscious Russian noncompliance:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) commends George Bush on the successful

3 conclusion of the START II Treaty;

4 (2) having received the START II Treaty from

5 the President, intends to take up the Treaty at the

6 earliest possible moment in pursuit of its Constitu7 tional duty to advise and consent to the ratification

8 of treaties;

9 (3) calls on President Clinton to encourage rati10 fication of START II by the Russian Parliament;

11 (4) calls on President Clinton to encourage the

12 ratification of START I by the parliaments of

13 Belarus and Ukraine; and
3

•SRES 54 IS

1 (5) calls on President Clinton to support appro2 priate forms and levels of assistance to the republics

3 of the former Soviet Union as a means to secure the

4 timely implementation of the START I and START

5 II treaties.

Æ
APPLICATIONUNDER THESMALLCOMMUNITYAIRSERVICEDEVELOPMENTPROGRAMSIOUXGATEWAYAIRPORT/COL.BUDDAYFIELD 

# Summary Information

A. Applicant Information :

X Not a Consortium Interstate Consortium Intrastate Consortium

X Community now receives EAS subsidy

X Community (or Consortium member) previousl y received a Small

Community Grant ; If previous recipient,

D ate of grant: Sep 2004 Oct 2010

E xpiration date of grant: Sep 2006 May 2012

Federal funds requested: $609,800 $500,000

Carrier(s) service obtained: N/A N/A

Destination(s) served: N/A N/A

B. Public/Private Partnerships **:**

Public Private

1. City of Sioux City 1. The Siouxland Initiative

2. Sioux Gateway Airport/Col. Bud

Day Field 2. Siouxland Chamber of Commerce

C

. Project Proposal **:**

X Marketing Start

- Up Cost Offset

Travel Bank Secu re Additional Service

Surface Transportation New Route

Launch New Carrier Subsidy

X Study Revenue Guarantee

Upgrade Aircraft First Service

Service Restoration Other ( explain below): Regional Service

D. Existing Landing Aids at Loca l Airport:

X Full ILS X Published Instrument Approach

Localizer Outer/Middle Marker

Other (specify): E. Project Cost:

Line Description Sub

Total Total

Amount

1 Federal amount requested $16 0,000

2 State cash financial contribution $ 28,00 0

Lo cal cash financial contribution

3a Airport cash funds $ 7,000

3b Non

- airport cash funds $ 5,000

3 Total local cash funds (3a+3b) $12 ,000

4 TOTAL CASH FUNDING (1+2+3) $20 0 ,000

In

- Kind contribution

5a Airport In

- Kind contribution** $0

5b O ther In

- Kind contribution** $ 4 0,000

5 TOTAL IN

- KIND CONTRIBUTION

(5a+5b) $ 40 ,000

6 TOTAL PROJECT COST (4+5) $240 ,000

F. In

- Kind Contributions:

For funds in lines 5a (Airport In

- Kind contribution) and 5b (Other In

- Kind contribution),

please describe the source(s) of fund(s) for each.

5b. 25% match from local media outlets that are part of the public

private partnership.

G. Is this application subject to review by State under Executive Order

12372 process?

a. This application was made available to the State under the Executive

Order 12372. Process for review on (date) _____________.

b. Program is subject to E.O. 12372, but has not been selected for

review.

c. Program is not covered by E.O. 12372.

H. Is the Applicant delinquent on any Federal deb t? (if “yes”, provide

explanation)

No

Yes (explain ) X

X
§ 300.12 Fee for estate tax closing letter. ( a ) *Applicability.* This section applies to the request by a person described in paragraph (c) of this section for an estate tax closing letter from the IRS.
( b ) *Fee.* The fee for issuing an estate tax closing letter is $67.
( c ) *Person liable for the fee.* The person liable for the fee is the estate of the decedent or other person requesting, in accordance with applicable procedures and policies, an estate tax closing letter to be issued with respect to the estate.
( d ) *Applicability date.* This section applies to requests for estate tax closing letters received by the IRS on or after October 28, 2021.
[T.D. 9957, 86 FR 53542, Sept. 28, 2021. Redesignated by T.D. 9962 at 87 FR 11297, Mar. 1, 2022]
§ 31.3121(a)(5)-2 Payments under or to an annuity contract described in section 403(b). ( a ) *Salary reduction agreement defined.* For purposes of section 3121(a)(5)(D), the term *salary reduction agreement* means a plan or arrangement (whether evidenced by a written instrument or otherwise) whereby payment will be made by an employer, on behalf of an employee or his or her beneficiary, under or to an annuity contract described in section 403(b)— ( 1 ) If the employee elects to reduce his or her compensation pursuant to a cash or deferred election as defined at § 1.401(k)-1(a)(3) of this chapter;
( 2 ) If the employee elects to reduce his or her compensation pursuant to a one-time irrevocable election made at or before the time of initial eligibility to participate in such plan or arrangement (or pursuant to a similar arrangement involving a one-time irrevocable election); or
( 3 ) If the employee agrees as a condition of employment (whether such condition is set by statute, contract, or otherwise) to make a contribution that reduces his or her compensation.
( b ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section is applicable on November 15, 2007.
[T.D. 9367, 72 FR 64942, Nov. 19, 2007]
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 150 (Thursday, August 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39377-39378]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18777]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

Open Meeting of the Area 6 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, New Mexico, North Dakota, 
Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 6 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comment, 
ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, September 1, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dave Coffman at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-
220-6095.

[[Page 39378]]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Area 6 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Tuesday, September 1, 2009, at 1 p.m. Pacific Time via telephone 
conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, 
notification of intent to participate must be made with Dave Coffman. 
For more information please contact Mr. Coffman at 1-888-912-1227 or 
206-220-6095, or write TAP Office, 915 2nd Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, 
WA 98174 or post comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: July 30, 2009.
Shawn F. Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E9-18777 Filed 8-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS FOUND IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          50,520
<SECURITIES>                                     3,855
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,849
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (520)
<INVENTORY>                                      3,818
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                72,947
<PP&E>                                          14,623
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (8,159)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  80,429
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,158
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        53,584
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,687
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    80,429
<SALES>                                         54,250
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                55,163
<CGS>                                           46,837
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   61,090
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,491)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,348)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,143)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,143)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)
        

</TABLE>
§ 31.3121(b)(12)-1 Services in employ of wholly owned instrumentality of foreign government. ( a ) Services performed by an employee in the employ of certain instrumentalities of a foreign government are excepted from employment. The exception includes all services performed in the employ of an instrumentality of the government of a foreign country, if— ( 1 ) The instrumentality is wholly owned by the foreign government;
( 2 ) The services are of a character similar to those performed in foreign countries by employees of the United States Government or of an instrumentality thereof; and
( 3 ) The Secretary of State certifies to the Secretary of the Treasury that the foreign government, with respect to whose instrumentality and employees thereof exemption is claimed, grants an equivalent exemption with respect to services performed in the foreign country by employees of the United States Government and of instrumentalities thereof.
( b ) For purposes of this exception, the citizenship or residence of the employee is immaterial.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Encorium Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lawrence R. Hoffman, Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                
|/s/ Lawrence R. Hoffman                                                         
|Lawrence R. Hoffman                                                             
|Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer

November 14, 2006

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of
the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



E-4
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 260

Congratulating Heather Whitestone on being crowned Miss America 1995.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 20 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Mr. SHELBY (for himself and Mr. HEFLIN) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Congratulating Heather Whitestone on being crowned Miss

America 1995.

Whereas on September 17, 1994, Heather Whitestone, a resident of Birmingham, Alabama and a student at Jacksonville State University, was crowned Miss America 1995;

Whereas Heather Whitestone is the first hearing-impaired

woman to hold the title of Miss America;

Whereas Heather Whitestone’s outstanding academic, artistic, and personal achievements make her a role model for

the youth of the United States;

Whereas Heather Whitestone’s success in overcoming significant obstacles to her personal and professional goals is

an inspiration to all the people of the United States who

face similar barriers to realizing their dreams; and
2

•SRES 260 ATS

Whereas Heather Whitestone’s commitment to excellence

makes her an exceptional choice for Miss America 1995:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate congratulates Heather

2 Whitestone on being crowned Miss America 1995.

3 SEC. 2. The Secretary of the Senate shall transmit

4 a copy of this resolution to Heather Whitestone, Miss

5 America 1995.

Æ
#### William T. GRIFFIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SANDY HOWARD PRODUCTIONS, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 85-6030.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 8, 1986.

Decided Sept. 9, 1986.

David B. Kesler, Brown, Dobson, Bur-nette, Kesler, Chattanooga, Tenn., for plaintiff-appellant.

Gary R. Patrick, Patrick, Beard & Samples, Chattanooga, Tenn., for defendant-ap-pellee.

Before MARTIN and JONES, Circuit Judges, and COHN, District Court Judge*.

*

The Honorable Avern Cohn, District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, William T. Griffin, filed a complaint against the defendant, Sandy Howard Productions, seeking damages for alleged breach of contract, trespass and conversion. Before Sandy Howard filed its answer, it filed a voluntary Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition in the Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California. Because the petition in bankruptcy was filed, the civil action against Sandy Howard was automatically stayed pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362 (1982). The district court then dismissed *sua sponte*Griffin’s complaint “without prejudice to [Griffin’s] right to pursue [his] claim in [the district] court with the permission of the Bankruptcy Judge,” reasoning that all of the issues could be resolved in the bankruptcy court. Griffin filed a motion to set aside the order under Rule 60 or Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which the district court denied. Griffin has appealed from the denial of that motion.

Griffin argues that the automatic stay provision of § 362 divested the district court of any power to dismiss the civil case filed in its court. That is, however, an issue we need not reach on this appeal for the district court committed a more fundamental error. The district court has no jurisdiction to dismiss *sua sponte*a diversity action because the issues may be resolved in a proceeding pending in another jurisdiction. *See Mendiola v. Hart,*561 F.2d 1207, 1208 (5th Cir.1977). The district court must await the resolution of the bankruptcy court proceeding in California before it can take any action on the civil case filed in its court.

We therefore REVERSE and REMAND the judgment with instructions to reinstate the case below.