alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 150 (Thursday, August 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 39374]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18844]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6722]


Waiver of Restriction on Assistance to Bolivia, Dominica, the 
Dominican Republic, Nicaragua, and St. Vincent and the Grenadines

    Pursuant to section 7088(c)(2) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2009 (Division H, 
Pub. L. 111-8) (``the Act''), and Department of State Delegation of 
Authority Number 245-1, I hereby determine that it is important to the 
national interest of the United States to waive the requirements of 
section 7088(c)(1) of the Act with respect to Bolivia, Dominica, the 
Dominican Republic, Nicaragua, and St. Vincent and the Grenadines, and 
I hereby waive such restriction.
    This determination shall be reported to the Congress, and published 
in the Federal Register.

    Dated: July 14, 2009.
Jacob J. Lew,
Deputy Secretary of State For Management and Resources, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. E9-18844 Filed 8-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-29-P
§ 25.2521-1 Specific exemption. ( a ) In determining the amount of taxable gifts for the calendar quarter (calendar year with respect to gifts made before January 1, 1971) there may be deducted, if the donor was a resident or citizen of the United States at the time the gifts were made, a specific exemption of $30,000, less the sum of the amounts claimed and allowed as an exemption in prior calendar quarters or calendar years. The exemption, at the option of the donor, may be taken in the full amount of $30,000 in a single calendar quarter or calendar year, or be spread over a period of time in such amounts as the donor sees fit, but after the limit has been reached no further exemption is allowable. Except as otherwise provided in a tax convention between the United States and another country, a donor who was a nonresident not a citizen of the United States at the time the gift or gifts were made is not entitled to this exemption. For the definition of calendar quarter see § 25.2502-1(c)(1).
( b ) No part of a donor's lifetime specific exemption of $30,000 may be deducted from the value of a gift attributable to his spouse where a husband and wife consent, under the provisions of section 2513, to have the gifts made during a calendar quarter or calendar year considered as made one-half by each of them. The “gift-splitting” provisions of section 2513 do not authorize the filing of a joint gift tax return nor permit a donor to claim any of his spouse's specific exemption. For example, if a husband has no specific exemption remaining available, but his wife does, and the husband makes a gift to which his wife consents under the provisions of section 2513, the specific exemption remaining available may be claimed only on the return of the wife with respect to one-half of the gift. The husband may not claim any specific exemption since he has none available.
( c ) ( 1 ) With respect to gifts made after December 31, 1970, the amount by which the specific exemption claimed and allowed in gift tax returns for prior calendar quarters and calendar years exceeds $30,000 is includible in determining the aggregate sum of the taxable gifts for preceding calendar years and calendar quarters. See paragraph (b) of § 25.2504-1.
( 2 ) With respect to gifts made before January 1, 1971, the amount by which the specific exemption claimed and allowed in gift tax returns for prior calendar years exceeds $30,000 is includible in determining the aggregate sum of the taxable gifts for preceding calendar years. See paragraph (b) of § 25.2504-1.
[T.D. 7238, 37 FR 28732, Dec. 29, 1972]
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 26, 2018.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 26, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A19I0094. R.L. "BUTCH" CONWAY IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SHERIFF OF 

GWINNETT COUNTY v. JANISE LATRELL JONES.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

17A09517
Drusilla Hufford 

Environmental Protection Agency 

Stratospheric Protection Division 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW 

Mail Code 6205J 

Washington, DC 20460 

7/2/2013

Ms. Hufford, 

On behalf of Heating, Air-conditioning and Refrigeration Distributors International (HARDI) I would like

to thank you and your department for your continued willingness to engage stakeholders on a variety of 

issues, including the development of the 2015-2019 HCFC Allocation Rule. HARDI vales its relationship 

with the EPA and looks forward to continuing to serve as a resource for the agency. 

In regards to the 2015-2019 HCFC Allocation rule, HARDI would like to make the following 

recommendations which we believe will be helpful as EPA continues to draft this important regulation. 

 HARDI asks that EPA and OMB work to move this regulation as swiftly as possible. A swift 

rulemaking would allow businesses to better plan for the future and allow for more 

communication throughout the supply chain on the phase-down of HCFC-22. 

 HARDI recommends that the 2015 allocation level for HCFC-22 begin at a level, no higher than 

40 million pounds and then proceed on a straight-line, or as close to a straight line as possible,

decline through the completion of this rule (2019).

 In the 2012-2014 Allocation rule, EPA stated that it may address the issue of “Dry-ship” 

condensing units in the 2015-2019 allocation rule. HARDI does not believe that EPA needs to 

address the issue in this rulemaking, as sales of these products continue to fall and do not 

represent a substantial problem in regards to the phase-down of HCFC-22. 

Again, we thank you for your efforts on this issue and your continued willingness to engage 

stakeholders. HARDI looks forward to participating and serving as a resource as the 2015-2019 HCFC 

Allocation rule is developed and completed. 

Regards, 

Jonathan Melchi 

Director of Government Affairs 

HARDI
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 61 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 61

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding certain recent remarks that 
 unfairly and inaccurately maligned the integrity of the Nation's law 
                         enforcement officers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 7, 1995

  Mr. Hyde (for himself, Mr. McCollum, and Mr. Schumer) submitted the 
following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of Congress regarding certain recent remarks that 
 unfairly and inaccurately maligned the integrity of the Nation's law 
                         enforcement officers.

Whereas police today are in more danger and face greater risks than ever before, 
        with thousands being assaulted and hundreds being killed or injured each 
        year;
Whereas attacks on the Nation's law enforcement officers directly endanger the 
        safety and well-being of all American citizens by incapacitating and 
        wounding those who protect all of us;
Whereas America's law enforcement officers are increasingly being confronted not 
        only with physical attacks, but with malicious, mean-spirited, and 
        misleading character assassinations that unnecessarily malign the 
        overwhelming majority of honest and ethical law enforcement officers 
        while at the same time undermining public confidence in our country's 
        duly established system of criminal justice; and
Whereas persons who hold positions of special social responsibility, such as 
        attorneys, officers of the courts, and instructors of our youth, by 
        virtue of their position bear a heightened responsibility not to mislead 
        the public, and especially not to mislead the public at the expense of 
        those upon whom we all rely for protection: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) this Nation owes a debt of the greatest magnitude to 
        the men and women who daily serve the people of America as law 
        enforcement officers;
            (2) the integrity, honesty, dedication, and sacrifice of 
        this Nation's law enforcement officers constitute the very 
        bedrock of the rule of law, which distinguishes a free society 
        from a state of tyranny; and
            (3) America's police deserve the thanks and support of the 
        people of the United States, which are hereby tendered by their 
        elected Senators and Representatives.
                                 <all>
```
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 111

JOINT RESOLUTION

Providing for the appointment of Anne D’Harnoncourt as

a citizen regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Stat4 utes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on

5 the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in

6 the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by

7 reason of the expiration of the term of Samuel Curtis
2

•HJ 111 EH

1 Johnson of Wisconsin on December 4, 1995, is filled by

2 the appointment of Anne D’Harnoncourt of Pennsylvania.

3 The appointment is for a term of six years and shall take

4 effect on December 5, 1995.

Passed the House of Representatives November 7,

1995.

Attest:

Clerk.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1313 Prepped by LaTeia Shed



### Document

Number: 

# 2 ) l-A- 1 Docket Number: 

# A-88-0 2

Printed 6/12/20089:03:27

AM Sheet 2 of 99P. 2 

## A-88-0 2

Informatio n o n healt h o r ris k assessmen t wa s remove d fromth e docket . Thi s informatio n wa s compile d befor e th e Clea n Ai r Ac t Amendment s (1990 ) bu t wa s no t use d i n th e developmen t o f th e chromiu

mNESHAP . 

# PT%iii- %

# Jk

•A..-^44~~*~~- . , • \ I l •s I" ' 

## M i 

# Z w 

# \*m p] 1 

# w^mSassz
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

** **

** **

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

** **

Referenceis hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as ofNovember 1, 2016, by and among J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage SecuritiesCorp., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as MasterServicer, Midland Loan Services, A Division of PNC Bank, National Association,as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as CertificateAdministrator, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as  Trustee, andPentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor and as Asset RepresentationsReviewer, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series2016-C4 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein nototherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuantto Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice Presidentof Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.       Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.       Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28thday of February 2018.

 

/s/Daniel Bober

DanielBober

ExecutiveVice President 

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo)  Together we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
          the quarter ended December 30, 1998 Form 10Q Balance Sheets and 
          Statements of Operations and is qualified in its entirety by reference
          to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                 0000856135
<NAME>                American Tax Credit Properties III, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>          1,000
<CURRENCY>            US Dollars
       
<S>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>            9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>        MAR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>           MAR-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>             DEC-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1.00
<CASH>                           572
<SECURITIES>                   3,079
<RECEIVABLES>                      0     
<ALLOWANCES>                       0
<INVENTORY>                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   0
<PP&E>                             0
<DEPRECIATION>                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                10,854
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          2,210
<BONDS>                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                        0
<COMMON>                           0
<OTHER-SE>                         0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  10,854
<SALES>                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 191
<CGS>                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   (403)  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (1,534)
<INCOME-TAX>                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (1,534)
<DISCONTINUED>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                  (1,534)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (42.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      0
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Patrick W. Kellick, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ACG Holdings, Inc. and AmericanColor Graphics, Inc., (collectively the “registrant”);  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date:    November 14, 2007 /s/  Patrick W. Kellick   Patrick W. Kellick   Chief Financial Officer
#### § 1.643(a)-2 Deduction for personal exemption.

The deduction for personal exemption under section 642(b) is not allowed in the computation of distributable net income.
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.7403-1 Action to enforce lien or to subject property to payment of tax. ( a ) *Civil actions.* In any case where there has been a refusal or neglect to pay any tax, or to discharge any liability in respect thereof, whether or not levy has been made, the Attorney General or his delegate, at the request of the Commissioner (or the Director, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, or the Chief Counsel for the Bureau, with respect to the provisions of subtitle E of the Code), or the Chief Counsel for the Internal Revenue Service or his delegate, may direct a civil action to be filed in a district court of the United States to enforce the lien of the United States under the Code with respect to such tax or liability or to subject any property, of whatever nature, of the delinquent, or in which he has any right, title or interest, to the payment of such tax or liability. In any such proceeding, at the instance of the United States, the court may appoint a receiver to enforce the lien, or, upon certification by the Commissioner or the Chief Counsel for the Internal Revenue Service during the pendency of such proceedings that it is in the public interest, may appoint a receiver with all the powers of a receiver in equity.
( b ) *Bid by the United States.* If property is sold to satisfy a first lien held by the United States, the United States may bid at the sale a sum which does not exceed the amount of its lien and the expenses of the sale. See also 31 U.S.C. 195.
[T.D. 7305, 39 FR 9950, Mar. 15, 1974]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                       5
<CIK>                                  0000856569
<NAME>                       COVALENT GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1                          
        
<S>                                   <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                        JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               6-MOS
<CASH>    2,021,779
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                           3,984,932
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        7,391,774
<PP&E>      970,415
<DEPRECIATION>                            279,092
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          8,278,312
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   4,502,753
<BONDS>           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                   11,676
<OTHER-SE>                              9,147,429
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            8,278,312
<SALES>   6,313,444
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        6,313,444
<CGS>     4,862,194
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           4,862,194
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        1,602,966
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (101,418)
<INCOME-TAX>                              103,518
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         2,090
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                2,090
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 .00
        

</TABLE>
1

 Deirdre Battaglia has been substituted for the original respondent, Kenneth R. Briley,

pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c)(2).

United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

August 14, 2006

Before

 Hon. RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

 Hon. KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge

 Hon. MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

No. 04-3044

Robert Simpson, Appeal from the United States

Petitioner-Appellant, District Court for the Northern

District of Illinois, Eastern Division.

v.

No. 02 C 3885

DEIRDRE BATTAGLIA, Warden,1

Respondent-Appellee. Matthew F. Kennelly,

Judge.

O R D E R

The slip opinion issued in the above-entitled cause on August 11, 2006, is amended as

follows:

Page 3, first paragraph, first line, delete “Greenwood” and replace with “Glenwood”.
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.6223(f)-1 Duplicate copy of final partnership administrative adjustment. ( a ) *In general.* Section 6223(f) does not prohibit the Internal Revenue Service from issuing a duplicate copy of the notice of final partnership administrative adjustment (for example, in the event the original notice is lost).
( b ) *Effective date.* This section is applicable to partnership taxable years beginning on or after October 4, 2001. For years beginning prior to October 4, 2001, see § 301.6223(f)-1T contained in 26 CFR part 1, revised April 1, 2001.
[T.D. 8965, 66 FR 50550, Oct. 4, 2001]