### Instructions for filling in the Emission Test Template

This Information Collection Request (ICR) spreadsheet is intended to collect information about emission data from fossil fue burning power plants and which test methods were used to do so for cases where the test methods are not currently supported by the Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT). This spreadsheet should only be used if the method is not in the ERT or if you do not have access to a lab which performs methods that are in the ERT. You must complete at least 3 separate runs or sampling events for each of the requested constituents. This spreadsheet is intended to be used for one boiler of one facility. Data for multiple boilers should be handled by using separate copies of this spreadsheet. are required. All cells that are shaded in green are populated using drop

- down lists. You do not need to populate cells shaded in gray, as they are automatically populated from the Boiler Information worksheet. spreadsheet with the following naming convention: [FacilityID]_Unit_[BoilerID]_EmisTestMethods.xls (example: 8100_Unit_2_EmisTestMethods.xls).

Please refer to the following steps when using these spreadsheets.

Boiler Information Worksheet

1. Please enter the EIA Facility Code, Facility Name and Boiler ID of your boiler on the Boiler Information worksheet. 2. Please enter the control device configuration.

Emission Data Worksheets

The emission data worksheets are provided for each constituent or constituent family required for this analysis. On each spreadsheet, you must enter boiler operating information during sampling, fuel input information, and emission test results. There are generally 1 to 3 emission test results records to be entered depending on the constituent or constituent family. For example, CO only requires 1 record with 3 sample events, while Mercury requires that you enter both Hg the Ontario

- Hydro Method was used, you would need to enter Hg 0

### , HgP, and Hg+2 

### . However, both the Speciated Volatile Organic HAP and Speciated Semi

-Volatile Organic HAP worksheets allow you to use a drop

field to define as many records as needed to record each HAP that you have results for. General instructions follow for these worksheets:

Boiler Operation Information

1. Please provide the values of all requested parameters for each of test run/sample. 2. Please provide any other supporting information or comments in the Other Supporting Information field.

Fuel Information

1. Please enter what types of fuel are being used in your boiler using the drop

- downs in the Fuel Type Selection field. You
may enter up to 4 fuel types. If you are not burning one or more of the fuel types entered in one or more samples, then enter an input rate of zero. 2. Please enter the unit of measure using the drop down provided. 3. Please enter the test method used to determine the fuel input rate. 4. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field.

Emission Data

### 1. Some constituents ask for the emission rate results of each run in two different units of measure, while others do not.

emission rate results are requested in two different units of measure (ex. lb/MMBtu (Pounds per million BTU) and ppmvd @ 7% O 2 

### (parts per million by volume dry basis at 7 percent oxygen)), you are required to provide both. 2. Please provide the test method used. This may or may not match the example given in the Test Method Used field. Please ensure that the name includes the owning organization of the test method (ex. U.S. EPA Method 0010). 3. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field. 4. If data sheets and QA/QC documentation tables are provided for the test method you are entering data for please also enter these data.

### This Information Collection Request (ICR) spreadsheet is intended to collect information about emission data from fossil fue l burning power plants and which test methods were used to do so for cases where the test methods are not currently supported by the Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT). This spreadsheet should only be used if the method is not in the ERT or if you do not have access to a lab which performs methods that are in the ERT. You must complete at least 3 separate runs or This spreadsheet is intended to be used for one boiler of one facility. Data for multiple boilers should be handled by using separate copies of this spreadsheet. Fields shaded in yellow down lists. You do not need to populate cells shaded in gray, as they are automatically populated from the Boiler Information worksheet. Please name each resulting spreadsheet with the following naming convention: [FacilityID]_Unit_[BoilerID]_EmisTestMethods.xls (example:

1. Please enter the EIA Facility Code, Facility Name and Boiler ID of your boiler on the Boiler Information worksheet.

The emission data worksheets are provided for each constituent or constituent family required for this analysis. On each spreadsheet, you must enter boiler operating information during sampling, fuel input information, and emission test results. There are generally 1 to 3 emission test results records to be entered depending on the constituent or constituent family. For example, CO only requires 1 record with 3 sample events, while Mercury requires that you enter both Hg 0 

### and Hg +2

### , or if . However, both the Speciated Volatile Volatile Organic HAP worksheets allow you to use a drop

- down provided in the Constituent field to define as many records as needed to record each HAP that you have results for. General instructions follow for

2. Please provide any other supporting information or comments in the Other Supporting Information field.

downs in the Fuel Type Selection field. You
may enter up to 4 fuel types. If you are not burning one or more of the fuel types entered in one or more samples, then

4. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field.

### 1. Some constituents ask for the emission rate results of each run in two different units of measure, while others do not. If emission rate results are requested in two different units of measure (ex. lb/MMBtu (Pounds per million BTU) and ppmvd @ (parts per million by volume dry basis at 7 percent oxygen)), you are required to provide both. 2. Please provide the test method used. This may or may not match the example given in the Test Method Used field. Please ensure that the name includes the owning organization of the test method (ex. U.S. EPA Method 0010). 3. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field. 4. If data sheets and QA/QC documentation tables are provided for the test method you are entering data for please alsoEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

10143 Colver Power Project ABB01Control Device Configuraton

Listed (by

boiler) in the Configuration Order Section of the Facility Unit Configurations Section of the Electronic ICRListed (by boiler) in the Configuration Order Section of the Facility Unit Configurations Section of the Electronic ICREIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 10143 Colver Power Project ABB01

1 4/28/2010 16:13 4/28/2010 2 4/29/2010 12:19 4/29/2010 3 4/29/2010 15:07 4/29/2010 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMe asured Value (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used
18:33 0.00209 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0011 14:34 0.00244 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0011 17:17 0.00241 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0011 Test End Time Formaldehyde Emission Test ResultsData Flag (ADL,

BDL, DDL) Test Method Comments lb/mmBtu ppmdv @ 7% O 2 ADL Detectable levels 0.00000227 0.00185 815132 ADL Detectable levels 0.00000258 0.00213 816491.3 ADL Detectable levels 0.00000256 0.00211 815561.6 Formaldehyde Emission Test Results Calculated Emission Rate Steam Output (1000 lb/hr)Fuel Input Rate 1163 7.4 14.62 5.15 273787 315 1201 1170.3 7.32 14.83 5.01 280046 315 1173 1195 7.19 14.77 5.06 277907 316 1144.33 Flue Gas Flow Rate (dscfm) Flue Gas

Temperature (F) Total Heat Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas

Moisture (%) Flue Gas

CO 2(%) Flue Gas

O 2(%)Fuel Type Units of Me asure Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure coal refuse (culm or gob) MMBtu/hr F-Factor coal refuse (culm or gob) MMBtu/hr F-Factor coal refuse (culm or gob) MMBtu/hr F-Factor

Fuel #1 Fuel #2Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of

Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of

Measure Fuel #3 Fuel #4Me asurement

Method Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 10143 Colver Power Project ABB01

1 4/28/2010 16:13 2 4/29/2010 12:26 3 4/29/2010 15:10 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start TimeMeasured Value (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry)

4/28/2010 18:12 5 Dry 4/29/2010 14:24 5 Dry 4/29/2010 17:09 5 Dry Methane Emission Test Results
Test End Date Test End TimeTest Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Test Method Comments lb/mmBtu

U.S. EPA Method 18 ADL [<0.015] U.S. EPA Method 18 ADL [<0.014] U.S. EPA Method 18 ADL [<0.015] Methane Emission Test Results Calculated Emission Rateppmdv @ 7% O 2

[<4.41] 815132 1163 7.4 14.62 5.15 273787 [<4.47] 816491.3 1170.3 7.32 14.83 5.01 280046 [<4.39] 815561.6 1195 7.19 14.77 5.06 277907 Flue Gas Flow Rate (dscfm) Calculated Emission Rate Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas

Moisture (%) Flue Gas CO 2(%) Flue Gas

O 2(%)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of

Me asure Measurement

Method Fuel

Input Rate Fuel Type Units of

Me asure
315 1201 coal refuse (culm or gob) MMBtu/hr F-Factor 315 1173 coal refuse (culm or gob) MMBtu/hr F-Factor 316 1144.33 coal refuse (culm or gob) MMBtu/hr F-Factor Flue Gas Temperat ure (F) Fuel #1 Fuel #2Me asurement

Method Fuel

Input Rate Fuel Type Units of

Me asure Measurement

Method Fuel

Input Rate Fuel Type Units of

Me asure Fuel #4 Fuel #3Me asurement

Method Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 10143 Colver Power Project ABB01

1 4/29/2010 5:45 2 4/29/2010 11:13 3 4/30/2010 5:43 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start TimePlease note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "AI"

Measured Value (μg/dscm) Basis (Wet or Dry)

4/29/2010 10:47 0.0855 Dry 4/29/2010 16:03 0.0835 Dry 4/30/2010 10:53 0.086 Dry

Test End Time Test End Date Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emission Test ResultsPlease note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "AI"

Test Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Test Method

Comments (lb/mmBtu)

U.S. EPA Method 30B Detectable levels 7.195E-08 816494 U.S. EPA Method 30B Detectable levels 7.085E-08 814793 U.S. EPA Method 30B Detectable levels 7.19E-08 816310 Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emission Test ResultsFuel Input Rate

1142.7 7.53 14.91 4.91 278182 321.6 1200.5 1182.7 7.26 14.8 5.04 278977 321.26 1158.7 1182.8 7.94 14.89 4.92 260530 321.81 1220.6 Flue Gas Moisture (%) Total Heat Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas CO 2(%) Flue Gas

O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm) Flue Gas

Temperature (F)Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of

Measure Measurement

Method coal refuse (culm or gob) MMBtu/hr F-Factor coal refuse (culm or gob) MMBtu/hr F-Factor coal refuse (culm or gob) MMBtu/hr F-Factor

Fuel #1 Fuel #2Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Measurement

Method Fuel #3 Fuel #4QA /QC Documentation

Trap ID Section 1

Mass (ng) Section 2

Mass (ng) Total

Mass (ng) Initial

Spike (ng) Total NonSpike (ng)
NN05395 25.484 0.47 25.954 0 25.954 NN07968 26.189 0.485 26.674 0 26.674 NN07752 26.765 0.3 27.065 0 27.065 Other Supporting InformationSample

Volume (dscm) Volume

Difference (%) Volume Diff. Limit Breaktrough

(%) Breaktrough

Limit Concentration

(μg/dscm) Trap ID

0.300983 1.84 0.086230784 NNP0121 0.301657 1.85 0.088424933 NNP0115 0.299008 1.12 0.090515973 NNP0120 ≤20% of field recovery test ≤10% of Section 1 Hg

mass for Hg conc. >1
μg/dscm: or ≤ 20% of Section Trap #1Section 1

Mass Section 2

Mass Total

Mass Initial

Spike Total NonSpike Sample

Volume Volume

Difference (%) Volume Diff. Limit
31.151 0.37 31.521 6 25.521 0.299599 29.951 0.36 30.311 6 24.311 0.298583 31.795 0.19 31.985 6 25.985 0.29771 ≤20% of field recovery test Trap #2Breaktrough (%) Breaktrough Limit Concentration

(μg/dscm) Abs. diff. RD (%) Limit C rec

1.19 0.085183862 0.001047 0.610754 0.02 1.20 0.081421246 0.007004 4.123547 0.01 0.60 0.087282926 0.003233 1.818373 0.02

* Spike Recovery

does not meet with the limit of the Method An em ail was forwarded to the Utility MACT ICR W ebsite regarding the handling of this and no response was received.

≥ 10 % RD mass for Hg conc. >1 μg/dscm: or
≤20% RD or ≤ 0.2 μg/dscm abs.diff. for Hg conc. ≤1 ≤10% of Section 1 Hg mass for Hg conc. >1
μg/dscm: or ≤ 20% of Section 1 for Hg conc. ≤1 Me asured Spike Recovery ( R ) Paired Trap Agreement (RD)R (%) by

Run Ravg(%) * Limit

92.3 60.4 81.8

An em ail was forwarded to the Utility MACT ICR W ebsite regarding the handling of this and no response was received. Average Recovery

, between 85 and 115% Me asured Spike Recovery ( R )

78.16666667EIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

10143 Colver Power Project ABB01

1 4/27/2010 15:07 4/27/2010 2 4/27/2010 17:16 4/27/2010 3 4/28/2010 5:40 4/28/2010 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMe asured Value (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used
17:17 0.16 Dry U.S. EPA Method 26A-Mod 18:42 0.26 Dry U.S. EPA Method 26A-Mod 6:53 0.51 Dry U.S. EPA Method 26A-Mod Hydrogen Cyanide Emission Test Results Test End TimeData Flag (ADL,

BDL, DDL) Test Method

Comments BDL Ph-11 0.000147 812669 1214.3 9.19 15.24 DLL Ph-11 0.000243 814302 1238.3 7.18 14.86 BDL Ph-11 0.000491 814816 1109.6 8.97 15.04 Calculated Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) Flue Gas Moisture (%) Flue Gas CO 2(%) Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Me asurement

Method 4.61 276594 315 1150.6 coal refuse (culm or gob) MMBtu/hr F-Factor 4.97 287909 316 1185.6 coal refuse (culm or gob) MMBtu/hr F-Factor 4.85 280299 312 1310.3 coal refuse (culm or gob) MMBtu/hr F-Factor Flue Gas Temperature (F) Fuel #1 Flue Gas O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm)Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel #2 Fuel #3Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel #4 Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

10143 Colver Power Project ABB01

1 4/27/2010 15:07 4/27/2010 2 4/27/2010 17:16 4/27/2010 3 4/28/2010 5:40 4/28/2010 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMe asured Value (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used
17:17 29.47 Dry U.S. EPA Method 26A-Mod 18:42 21.71 Dry U.S. EPA Method 26A-Mod 6:53 24.57 Dry U.S. EPA Method 26A-Mod Test End Time Hydrogen Chloride Emission Test ResultsData Flag (ADL,

BDL, DDL) Test Method

Comments ADL 0.0367 812669 1214.3 9.19 15.24 ADL 0.0276 814302 1238.3 7.18 14.86 ADL 0.0318 814816 1109.6 8.97 15.04 Hydrogen Chloride Emission Test Results Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr) Calculated Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) Flue Gas Moisture (%) Flue Gas CO 2(%)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method 4.61 276594 315 1150.6 coal refuse (culm or gob) MMBtu/hr F-Factor 4.97 287909 316 1185.6 coal refuse (culm or gob) MMBtu/hr F-Factor 4.85 280299 312 1310.3 coal refuse (culm or gob) MMBtu/hr F-Factor Flue Gas Flow Rate (dscfm) Flue Gas

Temperature (F) Fuel #1 Flue Gas O 2(%)Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel #2 Fuel #3Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel #4 Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

10143 Colver Power Project ABB01

1 4/27/2010 15:07 4/27/2010 2 4/27/2010 17:16 4/27/2010 3 4/28/2010 5:40 4/28/2010 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMe asured Value (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used
17:17 0.34 Dry U.S. EPA Method 26A-Mod 18:42 0.29 Dry U.S. EPA Method 26A-Mod 6:53 0.34 Dry U.S. EPA Method 26A-Mod Hydrogen Flouride Emission Test Results Test End TimeData Flag (ADL,

BDL, DDL) Test Method

Comments DLL 0.000232 812669 1214.3 9.19 DLL 0.000206 814302 1238.3 7.18 DLL 0.00024 814816 1109.6 8.97 Calculated Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) Flue Gas Moisture (%) Hydrogen Flouride Emission Test Results Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure 15.24 4.61 276594 315 1150.6 coal refuse (culm or gob) MMBtu/hr 14.86 4.97 287909 316 1185.6 coal refuse (culm or gob) MMBtu/hr 15.04 4.85 280299 312 1310.3 coal refuse (culm or gob) MMBtu/hr Flue Gas Temperature (F) Fuel #1 Flue Gas CO 2(%) Flue Gas

O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm)Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Measurement

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure F-Factor F-Factor F-Factor Fuel #2 Fuel #3Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel #4 Other Supporting Information