alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 210 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 210

  Expressing the sense of the Congress that a postage stamp should be 
  issued to honor law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 2, 1996

   Mr. Stupak (for himself and Mr. Ramstad) submitted the following 
     concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                    Government Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the Congress that a postage stamp should be 
  issued to honor law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty.

Whereas more than 14,000 law enforcement officers lost their lives in service to 
        American communities since records were started in 1794;
Whereas 174 law enforcement officers throughout the United States lost their 
        lives in service to American communities in 1995;
Whereas, every other day, one law enforcement officer is killed while serving an 
        American community;
Whereas more than 66,000 law enforcement officers are assaulted each year while 
        serving American communities and 24,000 are injured during such 
        assaults;
Whereas 600,000 law enforcement officers endanger their lives each day to serve 
        and protect American communities;
Whereas America's law enforcement officers represent the highly valued qualities 
        of strength, courage, and valor; and
Whereas issuing a postage stamp to honor the sacrifices of America's law 
        enforcement officers is proper and fitting: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) a postage stamp should be issued to honor law 
        enforcement officers killed in the line of duty; and
            (2) the Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee of the United 
        States Postal Service should recommend to the Postmaster 
        General that such a postage stamp be issued.
                                 <all>
```
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 276

A resolution providing that notwithstanding the sine die adjournment, the

President of the Senate, the President pro tempore, the majority and

minority leaders are authorized to make appointments to commissions,

committees, boards, or conferences.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 6 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Mr. MITCHELL (for himself and Mr. DOLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

A resolution providing that notwithstanding the sine die adjournment, the President of the Senate, the President

pro tempore, the majority and minority leaders are authorized to make appointments to commissions, committees, boards, or conferences.

1 Resolved, That notwithstanding the sine die adjourn2 ment of the present session of the Congress, the President

3 of the Senate, the President pro tempore, the majority

4 leader of the Senate, and the minority leader of the Senate

5 be, and they are hereby, authorized to make appointments

6 to commissions, committees, boards, conferences, or

7 interparliamentary conferences authorized by law, by con-
2

SRES 276 ATS

1 current action of the two Houses, or by order of the

2 Senate.

Æ
#### §§ 143.3-143.4 [Reserved]
exv10w1w63



 





Exhibit 10.1.63




AMENDMENT NO. 3

TO THE

SPECIALTY UNDERWRITERS’ ALLIANCE, INC.

PARTNER AGENT PROGRAM AGREEMENT




          This amendment (“Amendment”) is made and entered into as of December 31, 2006 (“Effective
Date”) by and between Appalachian Underwriters, Inc. (“Partner Agent”) and Specialty Underwriters’
Alliance, Inc. and its property and casualty insurance subsidiaries and affiliates (collective, the
“Company”), and amends the PARTNER AGENT PROGRAM AGREEMENT (“Agreement”), entered into by the
parties on October 11, 2005, as amended. Any terms defined in the Agreement and used herein shall
have the same meaning in this Amendment as in the Agreement. In the event that any provision of
this Amendment and any provision of the Agreement are inconsistent or conflicting, the inconsistent
or conflicting provision of this Amendment shall be and constitute an amendment of the Agreement
and shall control, but only to the extent that such provision is inconsistent or conflicting with
the Agreement. Any capitalized terms not defined herein shall be defined as in the Agreement.




          Now, therefore, in accordance with Section IX, D of the Agreement and in consideration of the
mutual agreements and covenants hereinafter set forth, the parties wish to amend the Agreement as
follows:




     Exhibit A, Section A shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:



     A. Except as otherwise provided in this Commission Schedule, Partner Agent’s Commission
shall be as follows:



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Program Description	 	Line of Business	 	Maximum Rate of Commission
	Artisan Contractor &
General Contractor in
the states specifically
described in the
underwriting guidelines
of the Company

	 	General Liability and
Automobile
	 	 	15	%
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	E-Comp. in the states
specifically described in the
underwriting guidelines of
the Company

	 	Workers’ Comp.
	 	 	12	%






          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed on their
behalf by their duly authorized officers as of the day, month and year above written.




	 	 	 	 	 
	SPECIALTY UNDERWRITERS’ ALLIANCE, INC.
	 
	 	 	 	 
	BY:

	 	/s/ William S. Loder	 	 
	NAME:

	 	 

 William S. Loder
	 	 
	TITLE:

	 	Senior Vice President, Chief Underwriting Officer	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	APPALACHIAN UNDERWRITERS, INC.
	 
	 	 	 	 
	BY:

	 	/s/ Robert J. Arowood
 


	 	 
	NAME:

	 	
 

 Robert J. Arowood
	 	 
	TITLE:

	 	 President
July 11, 2014

U.S. Enviro nmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Radiation Stratospheric Protection Division Attention: Rebecca von dem Hagen 1310 L Street NW, 10 th

Floor (1027J) Washington, DC 20005 Dear Ms. von dem Hagen: 

### Reference:

Pleas e contact me if you have any questions about this submission or need further clarification.

Via Federal Express
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-1-1995
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                          184,430
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   420,429
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,811,991
<PP&E>                          916,875
<DEPRECIATION>                  666,722
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  2,866,705
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           1,304,543
<BONDS>                         0
<COMMON>                        14,562
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<OTHER-SE>                      1,037,579
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    2,866,705
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                142,060
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   1,668,118
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                578,407
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (2,104,465)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 (2,526,106)
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (4,630,571)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (0.04)
        


</TABLE>
#### § 31.3231(d)-1 Service.

See § 31.3231(b)-1 for regulations relating to the term “in the service of an employer.”
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q OF
BERLITZ INTERNATIONAL, INC. FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000856529
<NAME>                        Berlitz International, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          28,215
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,146
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,540
<INVENTORY>                                     10,493
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               104,392
<PP&E>                                          70,470
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,590
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 670,607
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           89,929
<BONDS>                                          5,598
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,003
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     340,683
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   341,686
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               215,544
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  130,789
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,722
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,544
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,213)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,973
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3,007)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (2,144)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (5,151)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.54)


</TABLE>
427 A.2d 1222

#### Commonwealth v. Wright, Appellant.

Submitted November 16, 1979.

John H. Corbett, Jr., for appellant;

Charles W. Johns, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before PRICE, HESTER and CAVANAUGH, JJ.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 52 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 52

 Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the visit of the Prime 
       Minister of New Zealand, the Right Honorable James Bolger.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 28, 1995

 Mr. Rohrabacher submitted the following concurrent resolution; which 
        was referred to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the visit of the Prime 
       Minister of New Zealand, the Right Honorable James Bolger.

Whereas New Zealand and the United States enjoy a natural and historic 
        partnership built on shared values and shared Pacific shores, and an 
        unshakable commitment to democracy, human rights and to market 
        economies; and
Whereas the New Zealand Prime Minister will be visiting Washington, DC from 
        March 26 through 29, 1995, to meet with the President and leaders of the 
        United States Congress: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) welcomes the Prime Minister of New Zealand, the Right 
        Honorable James Bolger, to the United States of America on the 
        occasion of his visit;
            (2) recognizes the traditional and close ties between New 
        Zealand and the United States;
            (3) notes with interest the comprehensive economic reforms 
        New Zealand has undertaken over the last ten years, which has 
        seen it move from one of the most insulated and restrictive 
        economies among Organization for Economic Cooperation and 
        Development countries to one of the most open and competitive;
            (4) commends New Zealand for its dedication to reducing 
        agricultural protectionism and liberalizing world trade, 
        particularly in the Uruguay Round, where New Zealand and the 
        United States have worked closely together; and
            (5) welcomes bilateral trade between New Zealand and the 
        United States, which exceeded United States $2,000,000,000 in 
        1994.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Covalent Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth M. Borow, M.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/ Kenneth M. Borow, M.D.           
|Kenneth M. Borow, M.D.               
|President and Chief Executive Officer

August 11, 2006

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or
as a separate disclosure document.
exv10w13



 





Exhibit 10.13




CAL DIVE INTERNATIONAL, INC.




Summary of

2007

Executive Officer Cash Compensation




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Bonus Opportunity	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Base	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Total	 	 	Base and	 
	 	 	Salary	 	 	Performance	 	 	Group	 	 	Corporate	 	 	Bonus	 	 	Bonus	 
	Executive Management Team	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Quinn J. Hébert

President and CEO
	 	$	438,864	 	 	$	287,071	 	 	$	287,071	 	 	$	143,535	 	 	$	717,677	 	 	$	1,156,541	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Scott T. Naughton

Executive VP and COO
	 	 	286,965	 	 	 	170,488	 	 	 	170,488	 	 	 	85,244	 	 	 	426,220	 	 	 	713,185	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	G. Kregg Lunsford

Exec VP, CFO and Treasurer
	 	 	227,982	 	 	 	108,919	 	 	 	108,919	 	 	 	54,459	 	 	 	292,297	 	 	 	520,279	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Lisa M. Buchanan

VP, General Counsel and Secretary
	 	 	190,000	 	 	 	87,114	 	 	 	87,114	 	 	 	43,557	 	 	 	217,784	 	 	 	407,784
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 19, 2018

No. 04-18-00655-CR

Martin HERRERA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR8710A

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant filed a notice of appeal in the underlying cause on September 4, 2018. A 

clerk’s record was filed on September 14, 2018, and the docket sheet reflects that appellant is 

still awaiting sentencing. Because the trial court has not imposed sentence in the underlying 

cause, we have no jurisdiction to consider this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2 (providing 

appellate deadlines run from the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court). It is 

therefore ORDERED that appellant show cause in writing within two weeks from the date of this 

order why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All other appellate 

deadlines are SUSPENDED pending our resolution of the jurisdictional issue.

We further note that the trial court’s certification in this appeal states that “this criminal 

case is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas 

Rules of Appellate Procedure provides, “The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that 

shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these 

rules.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 19th day of September, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
#### Dickel Estate

*William B. Koch,*for trustees.

March 3, 1953.

Holland, P. J.,

By adjudication of this court, which became final June 21, 1952, and the schedule of distribution filed in pursuance thereof, the property allocated to the trust for Katherine D. Sharp in the schedule was awarded to Katherine D. Sharp and Agnes Kurtz Dickel, trustees for Katherine D. Sharp. In pursuance of his appointment in the adjudication, the examiner, Richard S. Lowe, Esq., made his examination and filed his report, which is now before the court for approval as to possession only by the trustees.

He reports that the assets, as shown by the schedule, were in the possession of the nominee of the trustees with some exceptions which are explained and are proper, such as sales and replacements. Were these assets in the possession of the trustees or in the possession of their nominee, such as is allowed by law, the court could approve the report as to possession by the trustees. Such is not the case. The report discloses that the assets are in the possession of Thayer, Baker & Company, an investment firm, and that all the stock share certificates are in the name of McCurdy *122& Company, the nominee of Thayer, Baker & Company. This is not the possession of the trustees and cannot be approved as such, and is illegal.

Section 943(c) of the Fiduciaries Act of April 18, 1949, P. L. 512, provides:

*“Corporate Fiduciary as Attorney-in-Fact.*

An individual trustee may employ a bank and trust company or a trust company incorporated in the Commonwealth, or a national bank with trust powers having its principal office in the Commonwealth, to act as his attorney-in-fact in the performance of ministerial duties, including the safe-keeping of trust assets, and such attorney-in-fact, when so acting, may be authorized to hold such investments in the name of its nominee to the same extent and subject to the same requirements that such attorney-in-fact, if it were the trustee, would be authorized to hold such investments in the name of its nominee.”

The law, therefore, has designated the class of institutions that can act for an individual trustee in the care, management, and administration of a trust. An investment firm is not among this class. Approval of the report must therefore be refused. The trustees should repossess themselves of these assets or take advantage of section 943(c) if they desire the assistance that that section of the Fiduciaries Act of 1949 affords, otherwise they may incur serious consequences.

And now, March 3, 1953, approval of the report as to possession by the trustees is suspended until they comply with the law as hereinabove indicated. The examiner is directed to give notice of this decree and opinion to the trustees or their counsel, together with a copy of the same which is being furnished by the court.
Date: September 12, 2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

NOTICE ACCEPTING FILING OF OBJECTIONS AS 

PETITIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION

Docket DOT-OST-2012-0204

Docket DOT-OST-2012-0205

On August 26, 2013, United Airlines, Inc. (“United”), filed an objection to Order 2013-4-12 tentatively 

finding National Air Cargo Group, Inc. d/b/a National Airlines (“National”), fit to engage in foreign 

scheduled passenger air transportation, along with a motion for leave to file an otherwise unauthorized 

document. On September 5, 2013, Delta Airlines, Inc., Airlines for America, and the Air Line Pilots 

Association, International filed answers in support of United’s objections. National has responded to 

these filings on September 4 and 9, respectively.

We note that the period for the filing of objections to Order 2013-4-12 has long passed, and that the 

Department’s Final Order 2013-7-12 had been issued on July 12, 2013 and was in section 41307 

Presidential review prior to the filing of these objections to our show cause order. 14 CFR § 302.14 

(Rule 14) permits the filing of petitions for reconsideration 20 days from the service date of 2013-7-12, 

with answers due 10 days thereafter. As a matter of administrative convenience, we will treat these

objections as petitions for reconsideration of the Department’s Final Order 2013-7-12 and National’s 

responses as answers thereto. If any other parties wish to file petitions for reconsideration or answers, 

Rule 14 will apply as usual.

We will serve this notice by email on all interested parties. 

Dated at Washington, D.C., September 12, 2013.

By:

SUSAN L. KURLAND

Assistant Secretary 

for Aviation and International Affairs 

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at:

http://www.regulations.gov
Attachment A

SERVICE LIST FOR

NATIONAL AIR CARGO GROUP INC. d/b/a NATIONAL AIRLINES

matwood@cozen.com

ewadsworth@cozen.com

hershel.kamen@united.com 

steve.morrissey@united.com

thomas.bolling@united.com 

lhalloway@crowell.com 

gmurphy@crowell.com

francis.heil@aa.com 

jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com 

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com 

sametta.c.barnett@delta.com 

esauer@ssd.com 

 luther.j.hipps@faa.gov

 peter.lynch@faa.gov

 leonard.beers@faa.gov

dberg@airlines.org

john.allen@faa.gov

john.duncan@faa.gov

Thomas.winston@faa.gov

paul.h.grandhahl@faa.gov

william.royal@faa.gov

kevin.montgomery®polaraircargo.com 

anita.mosner®hklaw.com 

howard.kass@usairways.com 

mbenge@zsrlaw.com 

dan.weiss@united.com

karine.faden@united.com

doug.kelley@united.com

robert.wirick@aa.com 

russell.pommer@atlasair.com 

chris.walker@delta.com 

sam.white@evergreenairlines.com

charters@evergreenairlines.com

agoerlich®ggh-airlaw.com 

jennifer.nowak®hklaw.com

benjamin.slocum@usairways.com

psanderlin@kalittaair.com