alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Christopher M. Cramer, Appellant, v County of Erie, Respondent.

[804 NYS2d 201]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Donna M. Siwek, J.), entered June 25, 2004. The order granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages for injuries that he sustained when he fell into a ravine in a park located on property owned by defendant county. Supreme Court properly granted defendant’s motion for summary judg*1146ment dismissing the complaint. Insofar as plaintiff alleges that defendant was negligent in failing to erect warning signs around the ravine, it is well established that there is no duty to warn of a hazard that is readily observable by the use of one’s own senses (see *Duclos v County of Monroe,*258 AD2d 925, 926 [1999]; *Tushaj v City of New York,*258 AD2d 283; 284 [1999], *lv denied*93 NY2d 818 [1999]; *Coote v Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.,*234 AD2d 907, 909 [1996]; *Plate v City of Rochester,*217 AD2d 984 [1995], *lv denied*87 NY2d 801 [1995]), particularly where, as here, the ravine “is a natural geographical phenomenon, the danger of which is open and obvious rather than latent” *(Coote,*234 AD2d at 909; *see Rosen v New York Zoological Socy.,*281 AD2d 238, 238-239 [2001]; *Tushaj,*258 AD2d at 284). Likewise without merit is plaintiff’s allegation that defendant was negligent in failing to erect a fence or guardrail around the ravine in order to protect plaintiff from falling into it. “It is well settled that ‘a landowner has no duty to erect barriers or fences in order to enclose natural geographical phenomena which do not in some way represent latent dangers or conditions, so as to prevent persons coming upon the land from injuring themselves by entering onto the condition in question’ ” *(Coote,*234 AD2d at 908; *see Rosen,*281 AD2d at 238-239; *Casela v City of Troy,*161 AD2d 991 [1990]). Finally, we conclude that plaintiff’s remaining allegations concerning defendant’s negligence lack merit as a matter of law. Present—Green, J.P., Scudder, Kehoe, Martoche and Hayes, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 58 Agreed to House (ATH)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 58

            Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 6, 1995

   Mr. Goss submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
            Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Friday, April 7, 
1995, it stand adjourned until 12:30 p.m. on Monday, May 1, 1995, or 
until noon on the second day after Members are notified to reassemble 
pursuant to section 3 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs 
first; and that when the Senate adjourns or recesses at the close of 
business on Thursday, April 6, 1995, Friday, April 7, 1995, Saturday, 
April 8, 1995, 
Sunday, April 9, 1995, or Monday, April 10, 1995, pursuant to a motion 
made by the majority leader, or his designee, in accordance with this 
concurrent resolution, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on 
Monday, April 24, 1995, or such time on that day as may be specified by 
the majority leader or his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, 
or until noon on the second day after Members are notified to 
reassemble pursuant to section 3 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. When the House adjourns on the legislative day of 
Wednesday, May 3, 1995, it stand adjourned until 12:30 p.m. on Tuesday, 
May 9, 1995, or until noon on the second day after Members are notified 
to reassemble pursuant to section 3 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 3. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble 
whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
                                 <all>
```
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO.

Robert W. Kneisley

Associate General Counsel

1901 L Street, NW

– Suite 640

Washin gton, DC 20036

(202) 263

- 628 4

(202) 263

- 6291

- Fax

bob.kneisley@wnco.com

January 9 , 201 2

The Honorable Susan Kurland

Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Application of US Airways, Inc. for Pendente Lite Authority to Operate

Within

- Perimeter Slot Exemptions ( DCA

- JAN ); Docket OST

- 20 00

- 7182

Dear Ms. Kurland :

On December 28, 201 1 Delta Airlines announced that it would terminat e

D CA

- JAN service on March 2, 2012 and return its two corresponding AIR

- 21 slot

exemptions for reallocation. On Januar y 4, 2012 US Airways requested p endente

l ite authority to operate the two exemptions until they are permanently reallocated

. I

am writing to inform the Department that Southwest Airlines has no object ion to US

Airways’ application for interim service in that market , subject, of course, to the

Department ’s oft

- stated admonition that the grant of pendent lite exemption authority

has no bearing on the award of permanent authority.

In fact, the Department’s overriding goal should be to reallocate the two slot

exemptions as promptly as reasonably possible on a permanent basis

, in a manner

that best vindicates the public interest

. To that end, Southwest will submit an

application in the reallocation proceeding that will generate far greater public

benefits than US Airways’ small aircraft service in the DCA

- JAN market.

Mo re importantly, t o allow US Airways to o btain slot exemptions on a

permanent basis

- and thereby increase its already dominant share of DCA slot

holdings

- would fly in the face of the Department’s recent decision o n the Delta/US

Airways “slot

- swap” requiring those carriers to give up DCA slots in order to preserve

competition

. If US Airways wishes to provide DCA

- JAN service on a long

- term

basis , it can do so simply by using just two of the 460 slots in its massive DCA

portfolio rather than trying to acquire the precious few slot exemptions that are

available for the benefit of the public

.

Sincerely,

cc: Polling list ; Docket OST

- 2000

- 7182
## Publications List

Series:Hate Crime

##   Use Search Filters  

### Select Filters

### Enter search criteria

### Sort by

Hate Crime Recorded by Law Enforcement, 2010-2019Date Published  September 2021SeriesHate CrimePublication TypePublication

Hate Crime Victimization, 2005-2019Date Published  September 2021SeriesHate CrimePublication TypePublication

Hate Crime Victimization, 2004-2015Date Published  June 2017SeriesHate CrimePublication TypePublication

Hate Crime Victimization, 2004–2012 - Statistical TablesDate Published  February 2014SeriesHate CrimePublication TypePublicationAgenciesBJS

Hate Crime Victimization, 2003-2011Date Published  March 2013SeriesHate CrimePublication TypePublicationAgenciesBJS

Hate Crime, 2003-2009Date Published  June 2011SeriesHate CrimePublication TypePublicationAgenciesBJS

Hate Crime Reported by Victims and PoliceDate Published  November 2005SeriesHate CrimePublication TypePublication

Hate Crimes Reported in NIBRS, 1997-99Date Published  September 2001SeriesHate CrimePublication TypePublication

## Side navigation

-  Just the Stats 
-  Search Publications 
-  Forthcoming Publications 
-  Research and Third-party Reports 
-  Data Corrections 

**Interested in Statistics?**

Sign up for email notices of new crime and justice statistical materials as they become available from BJS.

Subscribe
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This document is published to identify institutions of higher education that are ineligible for contracts and grants by reason of a determination by the Secretary of Defense that the institution prohibits or in effect prevents military recruiter access to the campus, students on campus or student directory information. It also implements the requirements set forth in section 983 of title 10, United States Code, and 32 CFR part 216. The institutions of higher education so identified are:

Vermont Law School, South Royalton, Vermont.

William Mitchell College of Law, St. Paul, Minnesota.

# ADDRESSES:

Director for Accession Policy, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, 4000 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Lieutenant Colonel Rose Jourdan, (703) 695-5529.

Dated: July 29, 2009.

Patricia L. Toppings,

OSD Federal Register, Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. E9-18827 Filed 8-5-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Properties III L.P.
(the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 30, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, James Hussey, Chief Financial Officer of Richman Housing Credits Inc.,
general partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties III L.P., general partner of
the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.




/s/James HusseyJames
      HusseyChief
      Financial Officer of RichmanHousing
      Credits Inc., general partnerof
      Richman Tax Credit Properties IIIL.P.,
      General Partner of the RegistrantFebruary
      13, 2009
Designation of Participant



 Exhibit 10.40 
  
 Designation of Participant Under the 
 Supplemental Management
Employees’ Retirement Plan 
  
  
 I hereby designate Dinyar Devitre as a Participant in the Supplemental Management Employees’ Retirement Plan (the “Plan”). 
  

In accordance with the provisions of Article II, Section A(1)(c) of the Plan, Mr. Devitre shall be entitled to receive an annual Supplemental Retirement Allowance based on
2.833 years of service while working for the Company in India (May 15, 1970 to February 28, 1973), an accrual rate of 1.75%, and his Final Average Earnings as of his retirement date. 
  
 The Supplemental Retirement Allowance shall be reduced as prescribed pursuant to Article II, Section C
of the Plan, by the Actuarial Equivalent value of any benefits payable under the Company’s other Retirement Plans for like service. 
  
 This SERP replaces and voids the SERP provided to Mr. Devitre on June 18, 1998. 
  

					
	May 18, 2004	  	 	 	/s/  Louis C. Camilleri
	Date	  	 	 	Louis C. Camilleri
	 	  	 	 	 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 Altria Group,
Inc.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant
to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Amended

Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted), Bing Yeh, the Chief Executive Officer of Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009, to which this Certification is attached as
Exhibit 32.1 (the Periodic Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 9th day of November, 2009.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ BING YEH           
|Bing Yeh               
|Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, has been provided to Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. and will be retained by Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the
Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 114 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 114

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
relative to contributions and expenditures intended to affect elections 
                     for Federal and State office.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 18, 1995

    Ms. Kaptur introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
relative to contributions and expenditures intended to affect elections 
                     for Federal and State office.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article --

    ``Section 1. Congress shall have power to set reasonable limits on 
expenditures made in support of or in opposition to the nomination or 
election of any person to Federal office.
    ``Section 2. Each State shall have power to set reasonable limits 
on expenditures made in support of or in opposition to the nomination 
or election of any person to State office.
    ``Section 3. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by 
appropriate legislation.''.
                                 <all>
```
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 172

Authorizing the 1996 Summer Olympic Torch Relay to be run through

the Capitol Grounds, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 11, 1996

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the 1996 Summer Olympic Torch Relay to be

run through the Capitol Grounds, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),
2

HCON 172 RDS

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF RUNNING OF 1996 SUMMER

2 OLYMPIC TORCH RELAY THROUGH CAPITOL

3 GROUNDS.

4 On June 20, 1996, or on such other date as the

5 Speaker of the House of Representatives and the Presi6 dent pro tempore of the Senate may jointly designate, the

7 1996 Summer Olympic Torch Relay may be run through

8 the Capitol Grounds, and the Olympic Torch may be dis9 played on the Capitol Grounds overnight, as part of the

10 ceremony of the Centennial Olympic Games to be held in

11 Atlanta, Georgia.

12 SEC. 2. CONDITIONS.

13 (a) IN GENERAL.—The event authorized by section

14 1 shall be free of admission charge to the public and ar15 ranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress, under

16 conditions to be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol

17 and the Capitol Police Board. The sponsor of the event

18 shall assume full responsibility for all expenses and liabil19 ities incident to all activities associated with the event.

20 (b) PROHIBITION ON DISPLAY OF ADVERTISE21 MENTS.—The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Po22 lice Board shall take such actions as may be necessary

23 to prohibit the display of advertisements for commercial

24 products or services during the event. Such actions shall

25 include measures to ensure that advertisements are not
3

HCON 172 RDS

1 displayed on any vehicle accompanying runners in the

2 Torch Relay.

3 SEC. 3. STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.

4 For the purposes of this resolution, the sponsor of

5 the event authorized by section 1 may erect upon the Cap6 itol Grounds, subject to the approval of the Architect of

7 the Capitol, such structures and equipment as are nec8 essary for the event.

9 SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

10 The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police

11 Board are authorized to make any additional arrangement

12 that may be required to carry out the event authorized

13 by section 1.

14 SEC. 5. LIMITATIONS ON REPRESENTATIONS.

15 A commercial sponsor of the 1996 Summer Olympic

16 Torch Relay may not represent, either directly or indi17 rectly, that this resolution or any activity carried out

18 under this resolution in any way constitutes approval or

19 endorsement by the Federal Government of the commer20 cial sponsor or any product or service offered by the com21 mercial sponsor.

Passed the House of Representatives June 10, 1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.

By LINDA NAVE,

Deputy Clerk.
Exhibit 10.18


Schedule
of Agreements with Executive Officers


The Company has entered
into change-in-control agreements with the executive officers listed
below.  Each agreement is substantially
identical in all material respects to the form agreement and amendment thereto,
set forth in Exhibits 10.16 and 10.17 to this 10-K report.


Joseph E. Abbott


Michael A.
Anderson


Steven A. Ellers


William J.
Federici


John R. Gailey III


Robert S.
Hargesheimer


Richard D. Luzzi
----

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Unabhängiger Finanzsenat, Auβenstelle Wien (Austria) lodged on 6 November 2006 — Gabriele Walderdorff v Finanzamt Waldviertel

(Case C-451/06)

(2006/C 326/83)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Unabhängiger Finanzsenat, Auβenstelle Wien

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Gabriele Walderdorff

Defendant: Finanzamt Waldviertel

Questions referred

Is Article 13B(b) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (1) (as last amended by Council Directive 2006/69/EC of 24 July 2006 (2)), hereinafter referred to as ‘the Sixth Directive’, to be interpreted as meaning that the grant of the entitlement to fish, for consideration, in the form of a lease concluded for a period of 10 years

constitutes ‘the leasing or letting of immovable property’?

----

(1)  OJ L 145, p. 1.

(2)  OJ L 221, p. 9.

----
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 144 Introduced in House (IH)]

  2d Session
H. J. RES. 144

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1996, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 1996

Mr. Obey introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1996, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That section 106(c) of Public 
Law 104-56 is amended by striking ``December 15, 1995'' and inserting 
``March 31, 1996''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 1.811-1 Taxable years affected.

Section 1.811-2, except as otherwise provided therein, is applicable only to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1957, and all references to sections of part I, subchapter L, chapter 1 of the Code are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended by the Life Insurance Company Income Tax Act of 1959 (73 Stat. 112).

[T.D. 6535, 26 FR 534, Jan. 20, 1961]
#### Charles S. Miller *v.*Frederick G. Reincke, Warden, Connecticut State Prison

King, C. J., Alcorn, House, Cotter and Thim, Js.

Argued October 9

decided October 9, 1968

*Arnold H. Klau,*special public defender, for the appellant (plaintiff).

*Walter M. Pickett, Jr.,*assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (state).

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed on the authority of *Reed*v. *Reincke,*155 Conn. 591, 236 A.2d 909, and *D’Amico*v. *Reincke,*155 Conn. 627, 236 A.2d 914.

There is no error.