Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 152 / Monday, August 10, 2009 / Notices 39987 

4 15 U.S.C. 78f. 

5 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4). 6 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 

1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 

2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 

3 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 

Exchange requests Commission 

approval to make the change retroactive 

to July 1, 2009. 

2. Statutory Basis 

The Exchange believes that the 

proposed rule change is consistent with 

the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,4

in general, and with Section 6(b)(4) of 

the Act,5 in particular, in that it 

provides an equitable allocation of 

reasonable dues, fees, and other charges 

among its members and other persons 

using the its facilities. The proposed 

rule change provides for a temporary 

suspension of initial, transfer, and 

relicensing fees applicable to all 

associated persons registering during 

the period of the fee holiday. 

B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement on Burden on Competition 

The Exchange does not believe that 

the proposed rule change will result in 

any burden on competition that is not 

necessary or appropriate in furtherance 

of the purposes of the Act, as amended. 

C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement on Comments on the 

Proposed Rule Change Received From 

Members, Participants, or Others 

Written comments were neither 

solicited nor received. 

III. Date of Effectiveness of the 

Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 

Commission Action 

Within 35 days of the date of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register or within such longer period (i) 

as the Commission may designate up to 

90 days of such date if it finds such 

longer period to be appropriate and 

publishes its reasons for so finding or 

(ii) as to which the self-regulatory 

organization consents, the Commission 

will: 

A. By order approve such proposed 

rule change, or 

B. Institute proceedings to determine 

whether the proposed rule change 

should be disapproved. 

IV. Solicitation of Comments 

Interested persons are invited to 

submit written data, views, and 

arguments concerning the foregoing, 

including whether the proposed rule 

change is consistent with the Act. 

Comments may be submitted by any of 

the following methods: 

Electronic Comments 

• Use the Commission’s Internet 

comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ 

rules/sro.shtml); or 

• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File 

No. SR–BX–2009–043 on the subject 

line. 

Paper Comments 

• Send paper comments in triplicate 

to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, 

Securities and Exchange Commission, 

100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 

20549–1090. 

All submissions should refer to File No. 

SR–BX–2009–043. This file number 

should be included on the subject line 

if e-mail is used. To help the 

Commission process and review your 

comments more efficiently, please use 

only one method. The Commission will 

post all comments on the Commission’s 

Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ 

rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the 

submission, all subsequent 

amendments, all written statements 

with respect to the proposed rule 

change that are filed with the 

Commission, and all written 

communications relating to the 

proposed rule change between the 

Commission and any person, other than 

those that may be withheld from the 

public in accordance with the 

provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be 

available for inspection and copying in 

the Commission’s Public Reference 

Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, 

DC 20549, on official business days 

between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. 

Copies of such filing also will be 

available for inspection and copying at 

the principal office of BX. All comments 

received will be posted without change; 

the Commission does not edit personal 

identifying information from 

submissions. You should submit only 

information that you wish to make 

available publicly. All submissions 

should refer to File No. SR–BX–2009– 

043 and should be submitted on or 

before August 31, 2009. 

For the Commission, by the Division of 

Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated 

authority.6

Florence E. Harmon, 

Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E9–19035 Filed 8–7–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8010–01–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[Release No. 34–60419; File No. SR–NYSE– 

2009–79] 

Self-Regulatory Organizations; New 

York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of 

Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of 

Proposed Rule Change Extending Until 

August 10, 2009 the Operation of 

Interim NYSE Rule 128, Which Permits 

the Exchange To Cancel or Adjust 

Clearly Erroneous Executions 

August 3, 2009. 

Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2

notice is hereby given that on July 31, 

2009, New York Stock Exchange LLC 

(‘‘NYSE’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with 

the Securities and Exchange 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the 

proposed rule change as described in 

Items I and II below, which Items have 

been prepared by the Exchange. NYSE 

has designated the proposed rule change 

as constituting a rule change under Rule 

19b–4(f)(6) under the Act,3 which 

renders the proposal effective upon 

filing with the Commission. The 

Commission is publishing this notice to 

solicit comments on the proposed rule 

change from interested persons. 

I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Terms of Substance of 

the Proposed Rule Change 

The Exchange proposes to proposes to 

[sic] extend until August 10, 2009, the 

operation of interim NYSE Rule 128 

(‘‘Clearly Erroneous Executions for 

NYSE Equities’’) which permits the 

Exchange to cancel or adjust clearly 

erroneous executions if they arise out of 

the use or operation of any quotation, 

execution or communication system 

owned or operated by the Exchange, 

including those executions that occur in 

the event of a system disruption or 

system malfunction. The text of the 

proposed rule change is available at the 

Exchange, the Commission’s Public 

Reference Room, and http:// 

www.nyse.com. 

II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Purpose of, and 

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 

Change 

In its filing with the Commission, the 

self-regulatory organization included 

statements concerning the purpose of, 

and basis for, the proposed rule change 

and discussed any comments it received 


rmajette on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
39988 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 152 / Monday, August 10, 2009 / Notices 

4See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 57323 

(February 13, 2008), 73 FR 9371 (February 20, 2008) 

(SR–NYSE–2008–09). 

5See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 57826 

(May 15, 2008), 73 FR 29802 (May 22, 2008) (SR– 

NASDAQ–2007–001). 

6See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58328 

(August 8, 2008), 73 FR 47247 (August 13, 2008) 

(SR–NYSE–2008–63). 

7See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58732 

(October 3, 2008), 73 FR 61183 (October 15, 2008) 

(SR–NYSE–2008–99). 

8See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59255 

(January 15, 2009) 74 FR 4496 (January 26, 2009) 

(SR–NYSE–2009–02). 

9See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59581 

(March 9, 2009) 74 FR 12431 (March 24, 2009) (SR– 

NYSE–2009–26). 

10See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59838 

(April 28, 2009) 74 FR 20767 (May 5, 2009) (SR– 

NYSEArca–2009–36) (See NYSE Arca Rule 7.10). 

11See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59581 

(March 9, 2009) 74 FR 12431 (March 24, 2009) (SR– 

NYSE–2009–26). 

12See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 60131 

(June 17, 2009) 74 FR 30196 (June 24, 2009) (SR– 

NYSEArca–2009–57) 

13See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59581 

(March 9, 2009) 74 FR 12431 (March 24, 2009) (SR– 

NYSE–2009–26). 

14See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 60312 

(July 15, 2009) 74 FR 36298 (July 22, 2009) (SR– 

NYSE–2009–70). 

15 15 U.S.C. 78f(a). 

16 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). 

17 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). 

18 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b– 

4(f)(6) requires a self-regulatory organization to give 

the Commission written notice of its intent to file 

the proposed rule change at least five business days 

on the proposed rule change. The text 

of those statements may be examined at 

the places specified in Item IV below. 

The Exchange has prepared summaries, 

set forth in sections A, B, and C below, 

of the most significant parts of such 

statements. 

A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Purpose of, and 

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 

Change 

1. Purpose 

The Exchange proposes to extend 

until August 10, 2009, the operation of 

interim NYSE Rule 128 (‘‘Clearly 

Erroneous Executions for NYSE 

Equities’’) which permits the Exchange 

to cancel or adjust clearly erroneous 

executions if they arise out of the use or 

operation of any quotation, execution or 

communication system owned or 

operated by the Exchange, including 

those executions that occur in the event 

of a system disruption or system 

malfunction. 

Prior to the implementation of NYSE 

Rule 128 on January 28, 2008,4 the 

NYSE did not have a rule providing the 

Exchange with the authority to cancel or 

adjust clearly erroneous trades of 

securities executed on or through the 

systems and facilities of the NYSE. 

In order for the NYSE to be consistent 

with other national securities exchanges 

which have some version of a clearly 

erroneous execution rule, the Exchange 

is drafting an amended clearly 

erroneous rule which will accommodate 

such other exchanges but will be 

appropriate for the NYSE market model. 

The NYSE notes that the Commission 

approved an amended clearly erroneous 

execution rule for Nasdaq in May 2008.5

On July 28, 2008, the Exchange filed 

with the SEC a request to extend the 

operation of interim Rule 128 until 

October 1, 2008 6 in order to review the 

provisions of Nasdaq’s clearly erroneous 

rule and to consider integrating similar 

standards into its own amendment to 

Rule 128. On October 1, 2008,7 the 

Exchange filed with the SEC a further 

request to extend the operation of 

interim Rule 128 until January 9, 2009 

in order to consider integrating similar 

standards into the amendment to Rule 

128. On January 9, 2009,8 the Exchange 

filed with the SEC a request to extend 

the operation of interim Rule 128 until 

March 9, 2009, indicating that the 

Exchange was still in the process of 

reviewing the Nasdaq rule with a view 

towards incorporating certain 

provisions into the amendment of 

interim Rule 128. 

On February 10, 2009, NYSE Arca 

submitted a proposal to the SEC to 

amend its clearly erroneous rule. The 

NYSE Arca proposed rule differed in 

certain respects from the Nasdaq clearly 

erroneous rule. On March 9, 2009, the 

Exchange filed with the SEC a request 

to extend the operation of interim Rule 

128 until June 9, 2009 9 to finalize 

review of NYSE Arca’s proposed 

amended CEE rule, which included 

market wide CEE initiatives, to 

determine if it was appropriate to 

incorporate such provisions into the 

Rule 128 amendment. 

Thereafter, on April 24, 2009, NYSE 

Arca filed a revised rule change with the 

Commission to amend its clearly 

erroneous rule (NYSE Arca Rule 7.10).10

The Exchange was in the process of 

finalizing its review of NYSE Arca’s 

revised CEE rule change, which also 

included market wide CEE initiatives, to 

determine if it was appropriate to 

incorporate all such provisions into 

NYSE’s interim Rule 128 amendment. 

On June 9, 2009, the Exchange filed 

with the SEC a request to extend the 

operation of interim Rule 128 until July 

15, 2009 11 to finalize review of NYSE 

Arca’s proposed amended CEE rule.12

On July 15, 2009, the Exchange filed 

with the SEC a request to extend the 

operation of interim Rule 128 until 

August 1, 2009 13 to finalize review of 

NYSE Arca’s proposed amended CEE 

rule.14

The Exchange anticipates finalizing 

proposed rule text of its clearly 

erroneous execution rule shortly, and is, 

therefore, requesting to extend the 

operation of interim Rule 128 until 

August 10, 2009. Prior to August 10, 

2009, the Exchange intends to formally 

file a 19b–4 rule change amending 

interim Rule 128. 

2. Statutory Basis 

The basis under the Securities 

Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’) 15 for 

this proposed rule change is the 

requirement under Section 6(b)(5) 16

that an Exchange have rules that are 

designed to promote just and equitable 

principles of trade, to remove 

impediments to and perfect the 

mechanism of a free and open market 

and a national market system and, in 

general, to protect investors and the 

public interest. 

As articulated more fully in the 

‘‘Purpose’’ Section above, the proposed 

rule would place the NYSE on equal 

footing with other national securities 

exchanges. This will promote the 

integrity of the market and protect the 

public interest, since it would permit all 

exchanges to cancel or adjust clearly 

erroneous trades when such trades 

occur, rather than canceling them on all 

other markets, but leaving them 

standing on only one market. 

B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement on Burden on Competition 

The Exchange does not believe that 

the proposed rule change will impose 

any burden on competition that is not 

necessary or appropriate in furtherance 

of the purposes of the Act. 

C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement on Comments on the 

Proposed Rule Change Received From 

Members, Participants or Others 

No written comments were solicited 

or received with respect to the proposed 

rule change. 

III. Date of Effectiveness of the 

Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 

Commission Action 

Because the foregoing proposed rule 

change does not: (i) Significantly affect 

the protection of investors or the public 

interest; (ii) impose any significant 

burden on competition; and (iii) become 

operative for 30 days from the date on 

which it was filed, or such shorter time 

as the Commission may designate, it has 

become effective pursuant to Section 

19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 17 and Rule 19b– 

4(f)(6) thereunder.18


rmajette on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 152 / Monday, August 10, 2009 / Notices 39989 

prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule 

change, or such shorter time as designated by the 

Commission. The Commission has determined to 

waive the five-day pre-filing period in this case. 

19 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 

20 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 

21For purposes only of waiving the 30-day 

operative delay, the Commission has considered the 

proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition, 

and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). 22 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 

1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 

2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 

A proposed rule change filed 

pursuant to Rule 19b–4(f)(6) under the 

Act 19 normally does not become 

operative for 30 days after the date of its 

filing. However, Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 20

permits the Commission to designate a 

shorter time if such action is consistent 

with the protection of investors and the 

public interest. NYSE requests that the 

Commission waive the 30-day operative 

delay because the Exchange believes 

that the absence of such a rule in an 

automated and fast-paced trading 

environment poses a danger to the 

integrity of the markets and the public 

interest. NYSE notes that immediate 

effectiveness of the proposed rule 

change will immediately and timely 

enable NYSE to cancel or adjust clearly 

erroneous trades that may present a risk 

to the integrity of the equities markets 

and all related markets. The 

Commission believes that waiving the 

30-day operative delay 21 is consistent 

with the protection of investors and the 

public interest because such waiver will 

permit the Exchange to continue 

operation of interim NYSE Rule 128 on 

an uninterrupted basis, and therefore 

designates the proposal operative upon 

filing. 

At any time within 60 days of the 

filing of the proposed rule change, the 

Commission may summarily abrogate 

such rule change if it appears to the 

Commission that such action is 

necessary or appropriate in the public 

interest, for the protection of investors, 

or otherwise in furtherance of the 

purposes of the Act. 

IV. Solicitation of Comments 

Interested persons are invited to 

submit written data, views, and 

arguments concerning the foregoing, 

including whether the proposed rule 

change is consistent with the Act. 

Comments may be submitted by any of 

the following methods: 

Electronic Comments 

• Use the Commission’s Internet 

comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ 

rules/sro.shtml); or 

• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File 

Number SR–NYSE–2009–79 on the 

subject line. 

Paper Comments 

• Send paper comments in triplicate 

to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, 

Securities and Exchange Commission, 

100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 

20549–1090. 

All submissions should refer to File 

Number SR–NYSE–2009–79. This file 

number should be included on the 

subject line if e-mail is used. To help the 

Commission process and review your 

comments more efficiently, please use 

only one method. The Commission will 

post all comments on the Commission’s 

Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ 

rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the 

submission, all subsequent 

amendments, all written statements 

with respect to the proposed rule 

change that are filed with the 

Commission, and all written 

communications relating to the 

proposed rule change between the 

Commission and any person, other than 

those that may be withheld from the 

public in accordance with the 

provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be 

available for inspection and copying in 

the Commission’s Public Reference 

Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, 

DC 20549, on official business days 

between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. 

Copies of such filing also will be 

available for inspection and copying at 

the principal office of the Exchange. All 

comments received will be posted 

without change; the Commission does 

not edit personal identifying 

information from submissions. You 

should submit only information that 

you wish to make publicly available. All 

submissions should refer to File 

Number SR–NYSE–2009–79 and should 

be submitted on or before August 31, 

2009. 

For the Commission, by the Division of 

Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated 

authority.22

Florence E. Harmon, 

Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E9–19033 Filed 8–7–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8010–01–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[Release No. 34–60420; File No. SR–CBOE– 

2009–052] 

Self-Regulatory Organizations; 

Chicago Board Options Exchange, 

Incorporated; Notice of Filing of a 

Proposed Rule Change Related to the 

Hybrid Matching Algorithms 

August 3, 2009. 

Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the 

‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2

notice is hereby given that on July 17, 

2009, the Chicago Board Options 

Exchange, Incorporated (the ‘‘Exchange’’ 

or ‘‘CBOE’’) filed with the Securities 

and Exchange Commission (the 

‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule 

change as described in Items I, II, and 

III below, which Items have been 

prepared by the Exchange. The 

Commission is publishing this notice to 

solicit comments on the proposed rule 

change from interested persons. 

I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Terms of Substance of 

the Proposed Rule Change 

The Exchange proposes to amend 

Rules 6.45A, Priority and Allocation of 

Equity Option Trades on the CBOE 

Hybrid System, and 6.45B, Priority and 

Allocation of Trades in Index Options 

and Options on ETFs on the CBOE 

Hybrid System, to adopt a modified 

participation entitlement priority 

overlay. The text of the proposed rule 

change is available on the Exchange’s 

Web site (http://www.cboe.org/Legal), at 

the Office of the Secretary, CBOE and at 

the Commission. 

II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Purpose of, and 

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 

Change 

In its filing with the Commission, the 

self-regulatory organization included 

statements concerning the purpose of 

and basis for the proposed rule change 

and discussed any comments it received 

on the proposed rule change. The text 

of those statements may be examined at 

the places specified in Item IV below. 

The Exchange has prepared summaries, 

set forth in sections A, B, and C below, 

of the most significant parts of such 

statements. 


rmajette on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICES