alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
39720.

#### HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY et al. v. CARROLL.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

M. A. Carroll received an injury while an employee of Murray County, Georgia, and an agreement to pay compensation was entered into between the parties, including the insurance carrier, on April 11, 1961, and approved by the State Board of Workmen’s Compensation on April 14, 1961. Compensation was paid under such agreement until November 9, 1961, when the insurer stopped making payments. On November 21, 1961, the insurer and employer filed a request seeking a hearing on a change in condition and on January 19, 1962, such hearing was held. Thereafter’, in June, 1962, the claimant filed a petition in the Superior Court of Murray County, Ga., seeking a judgment for accrued compensation from November 9, 1961, until the date of the hearing, held on January 19, 1962. The above facts were shown at the hearing before the superior court and it was stipulated that the application for a change in condition was still pending before the State Board of Workmen’s Compensation. *Held:*

1. “Where a claimant is entitled to compensation payments under *625a memorandum of agreement approved by the State Board of Workmen’s Compensation, the employer and its insurance carrier cannot discontinue payments thereunder until the claim has been paid in full, or has been settled between the parties, or until a new award or order of the board authorizes such discontinuance, or until an application for a hearing is filed with the board, and where none of these conditions exists at the time of discontinuance of payments, the claimant may obtain a judgment on the memorandum of agreement in the superior court under *Code*§ 114-711 for the unpaid compensation up to the date of filing of an application with the board for a hearing based on a change of condition.” *Employers Mut. Liab. Ins. Co. v. Derwael,*105 Ga. App. 54 (123 SE2d 345). See also *Sanders v. American Mut. Liab. Ins. Co.,*105 Ga. App. 472 (124 SE2d 923); *Zurich Ins. Co. v. Cooper,*106 Ga. App. 437 (127 SE2d 165); and *Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. Davis,*106 Ga. App. 369 (126 SE2d 909).

Decided September 24, 1962.

*Woodruff, Latimer, Saveli, Lane & Williams, John M. Williams,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Walter H. Bolling,*contra.

2. The claimant was entitled to a judgment from the date the insurance company and the employer ceased making payments under the approved agreement until the date the application for a hearing on a change of condition was filed. Accordingly, while the claimant was entitled to a judgment for the period between the time payments were stopped and the application for a change of condition was filed, so much of the superior court’s judgment as authorized a recovery while the application for a change in condition was pending was error and must be reversed.

*Judgment affirmed in p.art; reversed in part.*

*Frankum and Jordan, JJ., concur.*
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 181

To authorize testimony of a Senate employee.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 10 (legislative day, JANUARY 25), 1994

Mr. FORD (for Mr. MITCHELL) (for himself and Mr. DOLE) submitted the

following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To authorize testimony of a Senate employee.

Whereas in the case of United States v. Eduardo Lopez

Ballori, Cr. No. 91–380(GG), which was tried in the

United States District Court for the District of Puerto

Rico in 1992, the United States obtained the trial testimony of Claudia Breggia, a Senate employee;

Whereas by the privileges of the Senate of the United States

and rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate can, by administrative or judicial process, be taken

from such control or possession but by permission of the

Senate;

Whereas when it appears that evidence under the control or

in the possession of the Senate is needed for the promotion of justice, the Senate will take such action as will
2

SRES 181 ATS

promote the ends of justice consistent with the privileges

of the Senate; and

Whereas pursuant to section 130b(e)(1) of title II, United

States Code, the Senate’s authorization of testimony is

required in order for witness travel expenses to be reimbursable: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the testimony of Claudia Breggia in

2 United States v. Eduardo Lopez Ballori, Cr. No. 91–

3 380(GG) is deemed authorized.

Æ
#### § 1.860-4 Claim for credit or refund.

If the allowance of a deduction for a deficiency dividend results in an overpayment of tax, the taxpayer, in order to secure credit or refund of the overpayment, must file a claim on Form 1120X in addition to the claim for the deficiency dividend deduction required under section 860(g). The credit or refund will be allowed as if on the date of the determination (as defined in section 860(e)) two years remained before the expiration of the period of limitations on the filing of claim for refund for the taxable year to which the overpayment relates.

(The reporting requirements of this section were approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1545-0045)

(Sec. 7805, 68A Stat. 917; 26 U.S.C. 7805; sec. 860(e) (92 Stat. 2849, 26 U.S.C. 860(e)); sec. 860(g) (92 Stat. 2850, 26 U.S.C. 860(g)))

[T.D. 7936, 49 FR 2109, Jan. 18, 1984]
§ 1.663(c)-1 Separate shares treated as separate trusts or as separate estates; in general. ( a ) If a single trust (or estate) has more than one beneficiary, and if different beneficiaries have substantially separate and independent shares, their shares are treated as separate trusts (or estates) for the sole purpose of determining the amount of distributable net income allocable to the respective beneficiaries under sections 661 and 662. Application of this rule will be significant in, for example, situations in which income is accumulated for beneficiary A but a distribution is made to beneficiary B of both income and corpus in an amount exceeding the share of income that would be distributable to B had there been separate trusts (or estates). In the absence of a separate share rule B would be taxed on income which is accumulated for A. The division of distributable net income into separate shares will limit the tax liability of B. Section 663(c) does not affect the principles of applicable law in situations in which a single trust (or estate) instrument creates not one but several separate trusts (or estates), as opposed to separate shares in the same trust (or estate) within the meaning of this section.
( b ) The separate share rule does not permit the treatment of separate shares as separate trusts (or estates) for any purpose other than the application of distributable net income. It does not, for instance, permit the treatment of separate shares as separate trusts (or estates) for purposes of: ( 1 ) The filing of returns and payment of tax,
( 2 ) The deduction of personal exemption under section 642(b), and
( 3 ) The allowance to beneficiaries succeeding to the trust (or estate) property of excess deductions and unused net operating loss and capital loss carryovers on termination of the trust (or estate) under section 642(h).
( c ) The separate share rule may be applicable even though separate and independent accounts are not maintained and are not required to be maintained for each share on the books of account of the trust (or estate), and even though no physical segregation of assets is made or required.
( d ) Separate share treatment is not elective. Thus, if a trust (or estate) is properly treated as having separate and independent shares, such treatment must prevail in all taxable years of the trust (or estate) unless an event occurs as a result of which the terms of the trust (or estate) instrument and the requirements of proper administration require different treatment.
[T.D. 6500, 25 FR 11814, Nov. 26, 1960; 25 FR 14021, as amended by T.D. 8849, 64 FR 72543, Dec. 28, 1999]
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 58

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 6 (legislative day, APRIL 5), 1995

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legisla3 tive day of Friday, April 7, 1995, it stand adjourned until

4 12:30 p.m. on Monday, May 1, 1995, or until noon on

5 the second day after Members are notified to reassemble

6 pursuant to section 3 of this concurrent resolution, which7 ever occurs first; and that when the Senate adjourns or

8 recesses at the close of business on Thursday, April 6,

9 1995, Friday, April 7, 1995, Saturday, April 8, 1995,
2

HCON 58 RDS

1 Sunday, April 9, 1995, or Monday, April 10, 1995, pursu2 ant to a motion made by the majority leader, or his des3 ignee, in accordance with this concurrent resolution, it

4 stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Monday, April

5 24, 1995, or such time on that day as may be specified

6 by the majority leader or his designee in the motion to

7 recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second day after

8 Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section

9 3 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.

10 SEC. 2. When the House adjourns on the legislative

11 day of Wednesday, May 3, 1995, it stand adjourned until

12 12:30 p.m. on Tuesday, May 9, 1995, or until noon on

13 the second day after Members are notified to reassemble

14 pursuant to section 3 of this concurrent resolution, which15 ever occurs first.

16 SEC. 3. The Speaker of the House and the Majority

17 Leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with

18 the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority Lead19 er of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House

20 and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in

21 their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Passed the House of Representatives April 6, 1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Covalent Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth M. Borow, M.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 24, 2005 |  | /s/ Kenneth M. Borow, M.D.           
|                      |  | Kenneth M. Borow, M.D.               
|                      |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### § 31.6157-1 Cross reference.

For provisions relating to the time and manner of depositing the tax imposed by section 3301, see the provisions of § 31.6302(c)-3. For provisions relating to the time and manner of depositing the railroad unemployment repayment tax imposed by section 3321(a), see § 31.6302(c)-2A.

[T.D. 7037, 35 FR 6709, Apr. 28, 1970, as amended at T.D. 8227, 53 FR 34736, Sept. 8, 1988]
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.6011-6 Statement of series and series organizations [Reserved]
Exhibit 99.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Common Goal Health Care
Pension and Income Fund L.P. II, a Delaware limited partnership (the "Company"),
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Albert E. Jenkins,
III, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Common Goal Capital
Group, Inc., II, the managing general partner of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge and based on my review of the
Report:


                  1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                     By:  Common Goal Capital Group, Inc., II
                                          Managing General Partner

                                          ______________________________
                                          Albert E. Jenkins, III
                                          Chief Executive Officer and
                                          Chief Financial Officer

                                          November 14, 2002
IA

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 169

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating

to taxes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 28, 1996

Mr. BARTON of Texas (for himself, Mr. PETE GEREN of Texas, Mr. ARCHER,

Mr. SHADEGG, and Mr. HALL of Texas) introduced the following joint

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States relating to taxes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the follow4 ing article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitu5 tion of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents

6 and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by

7 the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States with8 in seven years after the date of its submission for ratifica9 tion:
2

•HJ 169 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE—

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. Any bill, resolution, or other legislative

3 measure changing the internal revenue laws shall require

4 for final adoption in either House the concurrence of two5 thirds the members present, unless that bill, resolution,

6 or measure is determined at the time of adoption, in a

7 reasonable manner prescribed by law, not to increase the

8 internal revenue by more than a de minimis amount.

9 ‘‘SECTION 2. The Congress may waive section 1 when

10 a declaration of war is in effect. The Congress may also

11 waive section 1 when the United States is engaged in mili12 tary conflict which causes an imminent and serious threat

13 to national security and is so declared by a joint resolu14 tion, adopted by a majority of the whole number of each

15 House, which becomes law. Any provision of law which

16 would, standing alone, be subject to section 1 but for this

17 section and which becomes law pursuant to such a waiver

18 shall be effective for not longer than 2 years.

19 ‘‘SECTION 3. All votes taken by the House of Rep20 resentatives or the Senate under this article shall be deter21 mined by yeas and nays and the names of persons voting

22 for and against shall be entered on the Journal of each

23 House respectively.’’.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 153 (Tuesday, August 11, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 40060-40061]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19122]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION

12 CFR Parts 619, 620, and 621

RIN 3052-AC35


Definitions; Disclosure to Shareholders; Accounting and Reporting 
Requirements; Disclosure and Accounting Requirements; Effective Date

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.

ACTION: Final rule; notice of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 40061]]

SUMMARY: The Farm Credit Administration (FCA or Agency), through the 
FCA Board (Board), issued a final rule under parts 619, 620, and 621 on 
June 17, 2009, amending FCA's regulations related to disclosure and 
reporting practices of Farm Credit System institutions. In accordance 
with 12 U.S.C. 2252, the effective date of the final rule is 30 days 
from the date of publication in the Federal Register during which 
either or both Houses of Congress are in session. Based on the records 
of the sessions of Congress, the effective date of the regulations is 
August 5, 2009.

DATES: Effective Date: Under the authority of 12 U.S.C. 2252, the 
regulation amending 12 CFR parts 619, 620, and 621 published on June 
17, 2009 (74 FR 28597), is effective August 5, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas R. Risdal, Senior Policy 
Analyst, Office of Regulatory Policy, Farm Credit Administration, 
McLean, Virginia 22102-5090, (703) 883-4498, TTY (703) 883-4434, or 
Robert Taylor, Attorney, Office of General Counsel, Farm Credit 
Administration, McLean, Virginia 22102-5090, (703) 883-4020, TTY (703) 
883-4020.

(12 U.S.C. 2252(a)(9) and (10))

    Dated: August 5, 2009.
Roland E. Smith,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. E9-19122 Filed 8-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
#### § 31.3406(i)-1 Effective date.

Sections 31.3406-0 through 31.3406(i)-1 (except §§ 31.3406(d)-5 and 31.3406(g)-1(c) and except for international transactions) are effective after December 31, 1996, and, optionally, for reportable payments made and transactions occurring on or after December 21, 1995. For the effective date of § 31.3406(d)-5, see § 31.3406(d)-5(i). Section 31.3406(g)-1(c) is effective before January 1, 1997. See §§ 35a.9999-0T through 35a.9999-5 of this chapter for rules that apply to international transactions after December 31, 1996.

[T.D. 8637, 60 FR 66133, Dec. 21, 1995]
# • RCRA REVISION CHECKUST 32 Standardsfor Generators - WasteMinimization Certifications 51 FR35190-35194

October 1, 1986 (HSWA Cluster I)

FEDERAL REQUIREMENT FEDERAL RCRA CITATION ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION STATE ANALOG IS: MORE BROADEQUIV- STRIN- ER IN ALENT GENT SCOPE PART 262 - GENERATOR REQUIREMENTS WAC 173-303
APPENDIX
UNIFORM HAZARDOUS WASTE MANIFEST generator's certification (item 16) Appendix 180(1) X
seeattachment (2 pages) for new form uniformmanifest instructions 8700-22 180(1 ) X 

# •

• October 1, 1986 - Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 1997
THIRD QUARTER 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,632
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      221
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (78)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,103
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,721
<PP&E>                                           3,288
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,965)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,349
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              686
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      9,464
<COMMON>                                        55,533
<OTHER-SE>                                    (59,334)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,349
<SALES>                                            205
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   596
<CGS>                                            2,121
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,121
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,301
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  30
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,738)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,738)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,738)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.65)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.65)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 137 (Monday, July 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 42118]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-18202]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

Agency Holding the Meeting:  Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Friday August 5, 2011.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance and Enforcement Matters. In the 
event that the times or dates of these or any future meetings change, 
an announcement of the change, along with the new time and place of the 
meeting will be posted on the Commission's Web site at http://www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-18202 Filed 7-14-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```