alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
www.gpo.gov

### §262b. Commitments for United States contributions to international organizations; limitations; consultation with Congressional committees

No representative of the United States Government in any international organization hereafter shall make any commitment requiring the appropriation of funds for a contribution by the United States in excess of 331/3 per centum of the budget of any international organization for which the appropriation for the United States contribution is contained in this Act: *Provided*, That in exceptional circumstances necessitating a contribution by the United States in excess of 331/3 per centum of the budget, a commitment requiring a United States appropriation of a larger proportion may be made after consultation by United States representatives in the organization or other appropriate officials of the Department of State with the Committees on Appropriations of the Senate and House of Representatives: *Provided, however*, That this section shall not apply to the United States representatives to the Inter-American organizations, Caribbean Commission and the Joint Support program of the International Civil Aviation Organization.

(Oct. 22, 1951, ch. 533, title VI, §602, 65 Stat. 599; Aug. 5, 1953, ch. 328, title I, 67 Stat. 368.)

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is act Oct. 22, 1951, ch. 533, title VI, 65 Stat. 599, popularly known as the Departments of State, Justice, Commerce and Judiciary Appropriation Act of 1952. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section is comprised of first paragraph of section 602 of act Oct. 22, 1951. Second par. of such section 602 contained a fiscal year provision.

#### Amendments

1953—Act Aug. 5, 1953, inserted proviso that this section is not to apply to the United States representatives to the Caribbean Commission and the Joint Support program of the International Civil Aviation Organization.

#### Similar Provisions

Provisions similar to this section were contained in act July 10, 1952, ch. 651, title I, 66 Stat. 550.

#### Section Referred to in Other Sections

This section is referred to in title 16 sections 773j, 3641, 5709.
DEPARTMENT THE

iNTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

R50 W

2

vd

fA ee
\o eh:

9 Raw
OPHIR 23 MF 157°
RET

? at®
.
PA

vous

Wier
}

R 40W'l

agin \ Ge ay
* Gaiony yar pee \ \ 35 es LS
eae? : j pose

odd

nee

a8
Z

6 -——

isgrog’ Uhr S3'W.
0

Base from U.S. Geological Survey

¢

13 r
i at
gat)

—

mn

R.51W
2

NS

wt PB. XG
4 [380 ee

fa)

wire fateh
Sa pa
i 42

Host

OPEN-FILE REPORT 88- 290

PLATE-1

4
R37W
30' R38 W GANES CREEK 10 Mi. \

7 Sarge 77 422"
BS 4! | fees] NS b

OS

STERLING LANDING
5 Me GRATES

Ld: ,
OI MB. | SY
FIO So VWI
BS

4 Ope
cg

GEORGETOWN 10 Mi.
Y SLEETMUTE 29 Mt
R. 44 W.

SCALE 1:250 000

5 9 5 10 15 20 25 MILES
In T

5 9 B 10. 15 20 25 KILOMETERS

SAMPLE LOCALITY MAP OF THE IDITAROD QUADRANGLE, ALASKA

J.M. MOTOOKA, J.E. GRAY, OLGA ERLICH, and GEORGE VANTRUMP, JR.

Wes fone

ok ca

This map is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed
for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 64 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 64

Authorizing the 1995 Special Olympics Torch Relay to be run through the 
                            Capitol Grounds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 1, 1995

Mr. Gilchrest submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the 1995 Special Olympics Torch Relay to be run through the 
                            Capitol Grounds.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF RUNNING OF SPECIAL OLYMPICS TORCH RELAY 
              THROUGH CAPITOL GROUNDS.

    On May 19, 1995, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House 
of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate may 
jointly designate, the 1995 Special Olympics Torch Relay may be run 
through the Capitol Grounds, as part of the journey of the Special 
Olympics torch to the District of Columbia Special Olympics summer 
games at Gallaudet University in the District of Columbia.

SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

    The Capitol Police Board shall take such action as may be necessary 
to carry out section 1.

SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS.

    The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions for physical 
preparations for the event authorized by section 1.
                                 <all>
```
NO. 07-07-0291-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

AUGUST 21, 2007

______________________________

MICHELLE MARTIN, APPELLANT

V.

CHARLES KIRTLAND AND DEBORAH KIRTLAND, APPELLEES

_________________________________

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY;

NO. C-1-CV-06-00-7610; HONORABLE J. DAVID PHILLIPS, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Michelle Martin filed a notice of appeal on June 12, 2007. However, she

did not pay the filing fee required of appellants under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure

5. Nor did she file an affidavit of indigence per Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1.

By letter from this Court dated July 30, 2007, we informed appellant that "[u]nless the filing

fee in the amount of $125.00 is paid by Thursday, August 09, 2007, this appeal will be

subject to dismissal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3.” The deadline lapsed, and the fee was

not received.
2

Because appellant failed to pay the requisite filing fee as directed by the Court, we

dismiss the appeal pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c).

James T. Campbell

 Justice
#### § 1.181-0 Table of contents.

This section lists the table of contents for §§ 1.181-1 through 1.181-6.

## § 1.181-1 Deduction for qualified film and television production costs.

(a) Deduction.

(1) In general.

(2) Owner.

(3) Production costs.

(4) Aggregate production costs.

(5) Pre-amendment production.

(6) Post-amendment production.

(7) Initial release or broadcast.

(8) Special rule.

(b) Limit on amount of aggregate production costs and amount of deduction.

(1) In general.

(i) Pre-amendment production.

(ii) Post-amendment production.

(iii) Special rules.

(2) Higher limit for productions in certain areas.

(i) In general.

(ii) Significantly paid or incurred for live action productions.

(iii) Significantly paid or incurred for animated productions.

(iv) Significantly paid or incurred for productions incorporating both live action and animation.

(v) Establishing qualification.

(vi) Allocation.

(c) Effect on depreciation or amortization of a qualified film or television production.

(1) Pre-amendment production.

(2) Post-amendment production.

## § 1.181-2 Election to deduct production costs.

(a) Election.

(1) In general.

(2) Exception.

(b) Time of making election.

(1) In general.

(2) Special rule.

(3) Six-month extension.

(c) Manner of making election.

(1) In general.

(2) Information required.

(i) Initial election.

(ii) Subsequent taxable years.

(3) Deductions by more than one person.

(d) Revocation of election.

(1) In general.

(2) Consent granted.

## § 1.181-3 Qualified film or television production.

(a) In general.

(b) Production.

(1) In general.

(2) Special rules for television productions.

(3) Exception for certain sexually explicit productions.

(c) Compensation.

(d) Qualified compensation.

(e) Special rule for acquired productions.

(f) Other definitions.

(1) Actors.

(2) Production personnel.

(3) United States.

## § 1.181-4 Special rules.

(a) Recapture.

(1) Applicability.

(i) In general.

(ii) Special rule.

(2) Principal photography not commencing prior to the date of expiration of section 181.

(3) Amount of recapture.

(b) Recapture under section 1245.

## § 1.181-5 Examples.

## § 1.181-6 Effective/applicability date.

(a) In general.

(b) Pre-effective date productions.

[T.D. 9551, 76 FR 60724, Sept. 30, 2011, as amended by T.D. 9603, 77 FR 72924, Dec. 7, 2012]
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos ESPINOZA-IBARRA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-10311.

D.C. No. CR-00-00124-ECR.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 10, 2002.*

Decided June 13, 2002.

Before RYMER, T.G. NELSON and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Carlos Espinoza-Ibarra appeals the 33-month sentence imposed after his guilty-plea conviction for one count of being an illegal alien found in the United States following removal, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We lack jurisdiction and dismiss.

Espinoza-Ibarra contends that the district court abused its discretion by only granting him a two-level downward departure for the minor nature of his previous aggravated felony, instead of the four lev*322els he requested. We lack jurisdiction to review the extent of a discretionary downward departure. *United States v. Riggins,*40 F.3d 1055, 1058 (9th Cir.1994).

Espinoza-Ibarra also contends that the district court abused its discretion by not granting a downward departure for his extraordinary acceptance of responsibility. We lack jurisdiction to review the district court’s discretionary decision not to grant a downward departure. *See United States v. Tam,*240 F.3d 797, 805 (9th Cir.2001).

DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 132 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                                                     December 21, 1995.
      Resolved, That the resolution from the House of Representatives 
(H.J. Res. 132) entitled ``Joint resolution affirming that budget 
negotiations shall be based on the most recent technical and economic 
assumptions of the Congressional Budget Office and shall achieve a 
balanced budget by fiscal year 2002 based on those assumptions'' do 
pass with the following

                               AMENDMENT:

            Amend the preamble as follows:

    Page 2, line 2, strike out [Office] and insert: Office, and the 
President and the Congress agree that the balanced budget must protect 
future generations, ensure medicare solvency, reform welfare, and 
provide adequate funding for medicaid, education, agriculture, national 
defense, veterans, and the environment. Further, the balanced budget 
shall adopt tax policies to help working families and to stimulate 
future economic growth

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             H. J. Res. 132

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENT
```
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 01670**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name 3**  **Description** x 

### 01670\01670_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 01670\01670_Completeness_Checklist.xlsx EPA Completeness Review Checklist x 

### 01670\01670_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 01670\01670_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 01670\01670_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 01670\01670_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 01670\01670_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 01670\Certification Statement Plant ID_01670.pdf Plant certification statement x 

### 01670\Supporting Documentation\01670_Aerial Map 1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey



### 01670\Supporting Documentation\01670_Bed ash system.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### 01670\Supporting Documentation\01670_Fly Ash Drawing.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 01670\Supporting Documentation\01670_Water Balance Diagram.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey



### 01670\Supporting Documentation\Bed ash system.xlsx Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### 01670\Supporting Documentation\Fly Ash Drawing.xlsx Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 01670\Supporting Documentation\Water Balance Diagram.xlsx Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket. 3No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
Motion Granted; Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 4, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-12-01045-CV

HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, Appellant

V.

RUFUS CHERRY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 157th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2010-09746

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from an interlocutory order signed November 2, 2012. On 

November 26, 2012, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.1. The motion is granted.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Seymore, Boyce, and McCally.
ADMINISTRATOR. WITHOUT INTEREST IN ANNUITY BONDS.

Court of Appeals for Hamilton County.

#### Mark A. Crawford, Administrator, v. The Foreign Christian Missionary Society; and Mark A. Crawford, Administrator, v. The American Christian Missionary Society.

Decided, March 8, 1915.

*Gifts*— Donations *to a Religious Society*— Evidenced *by Bonds Upon Which Annuities Were Paid*— Held *to Have Been Executed Gifts.*

Donations made by the decedent to the defendant society, receipted for by papers denominated annuity bonds and which recite that such donations are executed gifts to the society and are to belong to such society from the date thereof without any account or liability therefor, and which contain an agreement to pay an annuity to the donor during his lifetime, and such annuities being paid to the time of the donor’s death, are in fact executed gifts in which the administrator of the donor has no interest.

*W. C. Lambert*and *Guy W. Motion,*for plaintiff in error.

*Galvin ■(& Galvin*and *PL. A. Bayless,*contra.

*96Chittenden, J.

Plaintiff below, Mjark A. Crawford, as administrator of the estate of John F. Davis, deceased, began suit in each case to recover an amount of money which it was alleged the defendant had received for the benefit of the deceased or his estate. The defendants are religious organizations formed for the purpose of promoting the Christian religion.

It appears that at various times from 1897 to 1909, Mr. Davis had given various sums to these organizations, amounting in the aggregate to more than $30,000. Upon receipt of a given amount the societies issued to him a paper denominated an annuity bond. These bonds, in substance, recite that Mr. Davis had donated to and paid into the treasury of the society a specified amount of money, and recite that such sum so donated by him is to be considered as an executed gift to said society and to belong to said society from this date, without any account or liability therefor. It is further provided in the bonds that the society should pay an annuity of a given amount, in semi-annual payments, such payments to cease upon the death of the donor. These annuities ranged from four to six per cent, on the amount of the donation.

Without undertaking to discuss in detail the interesting arguments of counsel, we will state that it is our conclusion that the transaction constituted an executed gift, and that the paper issued by the society and denominated an annuity bond is a complete and specific declaration that it is a completed and executed gift. Such paper not only constitutes a declaration on the part of the society that it is receiving the money as a gift, but it is likewise a declaration upon the part of the donor who accepted these bonds and retained them during his lifetime. Whether the agreement upon the part of the society to pay the annuities could have been enforced by the donor, need not here be considered, because the societies did in fact pay to the donor such annuities until the time of his death.

Entertaining the views above announced, it follows that the .judgments should be, and the same are hereby affirmed.

Richards, J., and Kinkade, J., concur.
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.6511(c)-1 Special rules applicable in case of extension of time by agreement. ( a ) *Scope.* If, within the period prescribed in section 6511(a) for the filing of a claim for credit or refund, an agreement extending the period for assessment of a tax has been made in accordance with the provisions of section 6501(c)(4), the special rules provided in this section become applicable. This section shall not apply to any claim filed, or credit or refund allowed if no claim is filed, either ( 1 ) prior to the execution of an agreement extending the period in which assessment may be made, or
( 2 ) more than 6 months after the expiration of the period within which an assessment may be made pursuant to the agreement or any extension thereof.
( b ) *Period in which claim may be filed.* Claim for credit or refund of an overpayment may be filed, or credit or refund may be allowed if no claim is filed, at any time within which an assessment may be made pursuant to an agreement, or any extension thereof, under section 6501(c)(4), and for 6 months thereafter.
( c ) *Limit on amount to be credited or refunded.* ( 1 ) If a claim is filed within the time prescribed in paragraph (b) of this section, the amount of the credit or refund allowed or made shall not exceed the portion of the tax paid after the execution of the agreement and before the filing of the claim, plus the amount that could have been properly credited or refunded under the provisions of section 6511(b)(2) if a claim had been filed on the date of the execution of the agreement.
( 2 ) If no claim is filed, the amount of credit or refund allowed or made within the time prescribed in paragraph (b) of this section shall not exceed the portion of the tax paid after the execution of the agreement and before the making of the credit or refund, plus the amount that could have been properly credited or refunded under the provisions of section 6511(b)(2) if a claim had been filed on the date of the execution of the agreement.
( d ) *Effective date of agreement.* The agreement referred to in this section shall become effective when signed by the taxpayer and the district director or an assistant regional commissioner.
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 The undersigned officer of Summit Financial Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and in connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report), that, to such officer's knowledge:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated: August 7, 2003
 
 /s/ Blaise B. Bettendorf
 Blaise B. Bettendorf, Senior Vice President
 and Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Summit Financial Corporation and will be retained by Summit Financial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### §§ 1.904(f)-9-1.904(f)-11 [Reserved]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 165 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J. Res.165

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

                            Joint Resolution

 
 Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1996, and 
                           for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 104-99 is 
further amended by striking out ``March 22, 1996'' in sections 106(c), 
112, 126(c), 202(c) and 214 and inserting in lieu thereof ``March 29, 
1996'', and that Public Law 104-92 is further amended by striking out 
``March 22, 1996'' in section 106(c) and inserting in lieu thereof 
``April 3, 1996''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
§ 31.6694-2 Penalties for understatement due to an unreasonable position. ( a ) *In general.* A person who is a tax return preparer of any return or claim for refund of employment tax under chapters 21 through 25 of subtitle C of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) shall be subject to penalties under section 6694(a) of the Code in the manner stated in § 1.6694-2 of this chapter.
( b ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section is applicable to returns and claims for refund filed, and advice provided, after December 31, 2008.
[T.D. 9436, 73 FR 78454, Dec. 22, 2008]
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 72

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 25 (legislative day, MAY 15), 1995

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legisla3 tive day of Thursday, May 25, 1995, it stand adjourned

4 until noon on Tuesday, June 6, 1995, or until noon on

5 the second day after Members are notified to reassemble

6 pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, which7 ever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses or

8 adjourns at the close of business on Thursday, May 25,

9 1995, Friday, May 26, 1995, or Saturday, May 27, 1995,

10 pursuant to a motion made by the majority leader or his

11 designee, in accordance with this resolution, it stand re12 cessed or adjourned until 10 a.m. on Monday, June 5,

13 1995, or until noon on the second day after Members are
2

HCONRES 72 RDS

1 notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concur2 rent resolution, whichever occurs first.

3 SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the majority

4 leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with

5 the minority leader of the House and the minority leader

6 of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House and

7 Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in their opin8 ion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Passed the House of Representatives May 25, 1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.