alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, John F. Clifford, certify that:

 

1.                                       Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of ProCyte Corporation;

 

2.                                       Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                       Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)                                      Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this reportis being prepared;

 

b)                                     Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based upon suchevaluations; and

 

c)                                      Disclosed in the report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

4.                                       Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)                                      All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information ; and

 

b)                                     Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date:  August 20, 2004 | By:    | /s/ John F. Clifford                                    |   |
|----------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                             |   | John F. Clifford, Chairman and CEO  ProCyte Corporation |

 

----
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.6340-1 Records of sale. ( a ) *Requirement.* Each district director shall keep a record of all sales under section 6335 of real property situated within his district and of redemptions of such property. The records shall set forth ( 1 ) the tax for which any such sale was made, the dates of seizure and sale, the name of the party assessed and all proceedings in making such sale, the amount of expenses, the names of the purchasers, the date of the deed, and, in the case of redemption of the property,
( 2 ) the date of such redemption and of the transfer of the certificate of sale, the amount of the redemption price, and the name of the party to whom such redemption price was paid.
( b ) *Copy as evidence.* A copy of such record, or any part thereof, certified by the district director shall be evidence in any court of the truth of the facts therein stated.
Second Amendment to employment agreement Stephen Wynn



 Exhibit 10.104 
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this
“Amendment”) is entered into on the 31st day of January 2007, by and between Wynn Resorts, Limited (“Employer”) and Stephen A. Wynn (“Employee”). Capitalized terms that are not defined herein shall
have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement (as defined below). 
 RECITALS 
 A. Employer and Employee have entered into that certain Employment Agreement, dated as of October 4, 2002, as amended by that certain First
Amendment to Employment Agreement dated August 6, 2004 (collectively, the “Agreement”); and 
 B. Employer and Employee
desire to amend the Agreement to increase Employee’s Base Salary as provided herein. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
foregoing, the parties agree as follows: 
 1. Base Salary. Subsection 8(a) of the Agreement is hereby amended provide that, effective
February 1, 2007, Employee’s Base Salary shall not be less than $3,250,000 per annum. 
 2. Other Provisions of
Agreement. Other than as provided herein, the terms and conditions of the Agreement are ratified and confirmed. 
 IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the date first written above. 
  

			
	 WYNN RESORTS, LIMITED
	  	EMPLOYEE
		
	 /s/  MARC D. SCHORR
	  	 /s/  STEPHEN A. WYNN

	 Marc D. Schorr
 Chief Operating Officer
	  	 Stephen A. Wynn
IV

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 56

Expressing the sense of the Congress that rural health care should be

addressed in any Federal health care legislation.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 4, 1995

Mr. STUPAK submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Commerce

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that rural health care

should be addressed in any Federal health care legislation.

Whereas 27 percent of Americans live in rural areas;

Whereas many rural residents have poorer general health because they lack access to basic care;

Whereas rural areas lack sufficient resources to provide adequate long-term care;

Whereas rural areas lack an adequate number of medical personnel and have difficulty recruiting and retaining health

care professionals;

Whereas rural hospitals and health centers are experiencing

financial shortfalls and cannot fulfill all of the medical

needs of rural Americans;
2

•HCON 56 IH

Whereas rural areas have a disproportionate share of transportation-dependent individuals (including the elderly, the

poor, and the disabled) but do not receive a similar share

of Federal transit revenues;

Whereas rural emergency medical services are hampered by

long distances, poor road conditions, and limited financial

resources; and

Whereas significant numbers of rural persons with mental illnesses find it difficult, if not impossible, to secure needed

health care: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that any

3 legislation enacted to reform the health care delivery sys4 tem of the United States should—

5 (1) ensure that the unique needs of rural resi6 dents are addressed and solved;

7 (2) ensure that people who live in rural areas

8 receive the same quality health care as others;

9 (3) increase funding for programs that train

10 health care professionals for rural practice and pro11 vide incentives for them to practice in rural areas;

12 (4) encourage telecommunications consortia and

13 other measures to ensure rural access to emerging

14 medical technologies;

15 (5) increase coordination among transportation

16 programs, and increase funding to rural transit pro17 grams and to emergency medical services; and
3

•HCON 56 IH

1 (6) ensure that rural health care services are

2 coordinated effectively with existing systems and

3 programs of medical, income, residential, and social

4 support at the Federal, State, and local levels.

Æ
|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Registrant. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/              Neal              Ludeke                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |   |   |        |
| Neal LudekeChief                  Financial Officer of RichmanHousing                  Credits Inc., general partnerof                  Richman Tax Credit Properties IIIL.P.,                  General Partner of the RegistrantMarch                  14, 2008 |   |   |        |

----
SERVED: November 24, 2014 : ... ! .. -. 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

GLOBAL ARMS AND AMMUNITION 

DOCKET NO. FAA 2014-0320 

(Civil Penalty Action). 

: ; ~: --~~ ,._ 

ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN 

ANSWER 

Global Arms and Ammunition (hereinafter "Respondent") filed a Motion for Leave 

to File an Answer dated October 14, 2014, arguing it was not properly served. The 

Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter "Complainant") has not filed a Reply. 

WHEREFORE, it be and is hereby ORDERED as follows: 

1. Respondent's Motion for Leave to File an Answer is GRANTED; and 

2. Respondent's Answer dated October 14, 2014 is received; and 

3. Paragraphs #2 and #3 of the Procedural Order are amended as follows: 

a. On or before March 6, 2015, the parties shall conclude all discovery 

including, but not limited to, depositions, document production, responses to 

production requests and/or interrogatories. If the parties cannot resolve a 

discovery dispute they shall submit the dispute to the undersigned for 

resolution in a timely manner; 

b. The parties shall be prepared to present this case at a hearing on or after 

March 6, 2015, subject to the availability of courtroom facilities. The specific 

date and time for the hearing will be forthcoming in a separate Order. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 

1 

, __ / 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 

ONE COPY 

David Carl Williams, President 

Global Arms and Ammunition, Respondent 

28 -3ih Street N.E., Suite A 

Auburn, W A 98002 

TEL: 206-325-9400 

Kyle Lomazow, Complainant's Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Ave., S.W. 

Renton, W A 98057 

TEL: 425-227-1847 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0320 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2
THE NAVAJO NATION

REX LEE JIM \/ICE PRESIDENT Dr.AnitaLee(Air-3)

2 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX

I 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 RE: Request for Government-to-Government Consultation

in the Matter of U.S.E.P.A. Supplemental October 2010 Proposal for Best Available Retrofit Technology for Four Corners Power Plant with Alternative Option toResult in Greater Emissions Reductions and Visibility Improvement DearDr.Lee: li-i accordance with Executive Order 13175, the Navajo Nation hereby requests government-to- government consultation with the U.S.E.P.A., Region IX,todiscuss potential impacts tothe Navajo Nation asaresult of the U.S.E.P.A. determination
for Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) for Four Corners Power Plant (FCPP), as proposed
in the Supplementary October 2010 Proposal forBART for FCPP with Alternative Option toResult in Greater Emissions Reductions and Visibifity Improvement. Preliminarily, the Navajo Nation
is supportive
of the supplemental proposal, which will result in meaningful emissions reductions, and will notresult in job losses orcause

adecrease
in revenuetothe Navajo Nation. Within the broad contextof the supplemental proposal, there are positive economic and environmental aspectstobe supportive
of, and the supplemental proposal will elude the previous critical impacts that the Navajo Nation voiced inits March 2010 comments

tothe ANPRM. The Navajo Nation
is interested
in discussing the potential future impacts, beyond BART for FCPP, that mayarise outofaBART determination, especially

if SCR will be determined BART for FCPP. Particularly, the Navajo Nation
is concerned that without the utilization
ofaphased approach for the installation and implementation

of SCR, and without adequate consideration

ofatimeline that reasonably examines other proposed rulemakings, e.g., Mercury, GHG, and coal combustion, and how the FCPP will meetfuture schedules for addressing the additional anticipated rulemakings, there maybe future causesfor concern related tolosses of jobs and decreases
in revenue
tothe Navajo Nation. Weare equally interested
in discussing any planned health strategies that the U.S.E.P.A. has developed,
ormaybe working
to develop,
in consultation with Tribes, that will serveto provide important baseline health data from which conclusions
orreasoned implications canbe drawn about the effectiveness

of rulemakings under The Clean Air Actthat have improved public health. POST OFFICE BOX 7440
/ WINDOW ROCK NAVAJO NATION, ARIZONA

/ 86515 TELEPHONE: (928) 871-7000

/ FAX: (928) 871-4025I We appreciate your flexibility
in seeking the views of the Navajo Nation in this regulatory process and we look forward
to meaningful dialogue between the U.S.E.P.A. and our representatives

in this matter. Very Respectfully, Ben Shelly, P’,esiden) THE NAVAJO•TION Xc: Stephan Etsitty, Director, Navajo EPA Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator, Region IX File
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

  

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2015, byand among Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Master Servicer and initial Excluded Special Servicer,LNR Partners, LLC, as General Special Servicer, Park Bridge Lender ServicesLLC, as Trust Advisor, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, and WellsFargo Bank, National Association as Certificate Administrator, CertificateRegistrar, Authenticating Agent and Custodian, with respect to CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-C26 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 13.9 ofthe Agreement, I, Daniel Marthinsen, Managing Director of Special Servicinghereby certify that:

 

1.  A review of theactivities of the Excluded Special Servicer Servicer during the period fromJanuary 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”),and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made undermy supervision, and

 

2.  To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Excluded Special Servicer, has fulfilledall of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

/s/ Daniel Marthinsen

Daniel Marthinsen 

Managing Director

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
Exhibit
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Properties III L.P.
(the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, David Salzman, Chief Executive Officer of Richman Housing Credits Inc.,
general partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties III L.P., general partner of
the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to
(S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.
  
  /s/
David
Salzman David
Salzman
 Chief
Executive Officer of Richman Housing
 Credits
Inc., general partner of Richman
 Tax
Credit Properties III L.P., general partner
 of the
Registrant
 February
11, 2005
427 A.2d 1228

#### Commonwealth v. Miller, R., Appellant.

Reargument Denied July 8, 1980.

Argued November 12, 1979.

John J. Dirienzo, Jr., for appellant;

C. Gregory Frantz, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before SPAETH, HOFFMAN and VAN der VOORT, JJ.

The judgment of sentence of the lower court is hereby affirmed.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Douglas Hayth BREWBAKER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-6356.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 28, 2002.

Decided June 6, 2002.

Douglas Hayth Brewbaker, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Douglas Hayth Brewbaker appeals the district court’s order denying his request to stop the Bureau of Prisons from collecting his court-ordered restitution, which was agreed to in his plea agreement. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. *See United States v. Brown,*232 F.3d 399, 403-06 (4th Cir. 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALEXANDER MEZHBEIN,

 Petitioner - Appellee,

 v.

J. F. SALAZAR, Warden,

 Respondent - Appellant.

No. 08-55131

D.C. No. CV-06-08059-DOC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

David O. Carter, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 7, 2012** 

Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW, PAEZ, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

Warden J.F. Salazar appeals the district court’s grant of inmate Alexander

Mezhbein’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we reverse. 

FILED

JUN 08 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
1. Although Mezhbein was released from prison pursuant to an order of the

district court, this appeal is not moot. Mezhbein’s release was effected by the very

order that the Warden now argues was in error. See Eagles v. United States ex rel.

Samuels, 329 U.S. 304, 307–08 (1946) (“Though the writ has been granted and the

prisoner released, the appellate court by what it does is not rendering an opinion

and issuing an order which cannot affect the litigants in the case before it. . . .

Reversal undoes what the habeas corpus court did and makes lawful a resumption

of the custody.”). 

2. Mezhbein argues that the Warden failed to appeal the district court’s order

subsequent to its initial grant of Mezhbein’s habeas petition, which directed the

state governor to consent to Mezhbein’s release from prison. The Warden was not

obligated to appeal the district court’s subsequent order, because the relevant

judgment in a federal habeas appeal is the district court’s grant or denial of the writ

itself. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(a); see also Eagles, 329 U.S. at 307.

3. Federal due process requires only that a prisoner seeking parole receive an

opportunity to be heard, notification of the reasons for any denial, and advance

access to the record. See Swarthout v. Cooke, 131 S. Ct. 859, 862 (2011).

Mezhbein concedes that he was afforded this constitutionally adequate process. 
4. Finally, we note that since his release, Mezhbein has lived peaceably in

Southern California for five years. That the state is constitutionally entitled to

return him to custody does not mean that it would be judicious to do so. 

REVERSED.