alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. 

1585 BROADWAY

NEW YORK, New York 10036-8200

 

Re:          Annual Statement of Compliance for Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. CommercialMortgage Pass Through Certificates, Series 2016-BNK2

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of November 1, 2016 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a)     A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of itsperformance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision;and

 

(b)     Tothe best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

  

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go  far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
#### Damian JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James L. JENKINS, Chairman, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 02-6387.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 13, 2002.

Decided June 18, 2002.

*653Damian Jackson, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Damian Jackson appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint.' Jackson’s case was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1994). The magistrate judge recommended that, relief be denied and advised Jackson that failure to file timely and specific objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court’s order based on the recommendation. Despite this warning, Jackson failed to file any objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation.

The timely filing of objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. Fed. R.Civ.P. 72(b); *Wright v. Collins,*766 F.2d 841, 845-47 (4th Cir.1985); *see also Thomas v. Arn,*474 U.S. 140, 155, 106 S.Ct. 466, 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985). Failure to file timely specific objections shall constitute a waiver of a party’s appellate review if the recommendation is accepted by a district judge. *United States v. Schronce,*727 F.2d 91, 94 & n. 4 (4th Cir.1984). Jackson has waived appellate review by failing to file any objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
(logo) GREYSTONE

 

C-III ASSET MANAGEMENT LLCd/b/a

GREYSTONE SPECIAL SERVICING

5221 N. O’Connor Blvd., Suite800

Irving, Texas 75039

Phone: 972-868-5300

Fax: 972-868-5303

 

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

**C-III Asset Management LLC**

 

The undersigned, Barry Davis,Vice President of C-III Asset Management LLC, the current Special Servicerunder that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1,2016, relating to the **Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust 2016-C36, CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-C36** (the “Pooling andServicing Agreement”), hereby certifies as follows:

 

1.  a review of theactivities of the Special Servicer and of its performance under the Pooling andServicing Agreement during the calendar year 2019 (the “Reporting Period”) hasbeen made under the undersigned’s supervision;

 

2.  to the best of theundersigned’s knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer maintainedan effective internal control system relating to its servicing of the MortgageLoans serviced by it and has fulfilled in all material respects its obligationsunder the Pooling and Servicing Agreement throughout the Reporting Period.

 

Capitalized terms nototherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given them in the Pooling andServicing Agreement.

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, as of the 1st day of March, 2020, I have hereuntosigned my name.

 

/s/ Barry Davis

**Barry Davis**, Vice President
§ 40.6011(a)-2 Final returns. ( a ) *In general* — ( 1 ) *Permanent cessation of operations.* Any person that is required under § 40.6011(a)-1 to make returns and that permanently ceases all operations with respect to which liability for tax was incurred (or with respect to which tax had to be collected and paid over) must make a final return in accordance with the instructions applicable to the form on which the return is made. A person does not make a final return if only a temporary or partial cessation of such operations occurs and must continue to file returns as required under § 40.6011(a)-1.
( 2 ) *Change in law without cessation of operations.* Any person that is required under § 40.6011(a)-1 to make returns must make a final return in accordance with the instructions applicable to the form on which the return is made if, by reason of a change in law, that person is no longer liable for any tax (or, in the case of a collected tax, is no longer responsible for collecting and paying over any tax). For example, if the tax on a product is changed from a retail tax to a manufacturers tax, a retailer formerly liable for the tax but now buying the product tax-paid from its supplier must make a final return (assuming that the retailer has no other tax liability reportable on the return).
( b ) *Special rule for one-time filings* — ( 1 ) *In general.* A first return is also a final return if it is a one-time filing. A return is a one-time filing if the person reporting tax does not engage in any activity with respect to which tax is reportable on the return in the course of a trade or business.
( 2 ) *Deposits not required.* See § 40.6302(c)-1(e)(2) for a rule providing that no deposit of taxes reported on a one-time filing is required.
( c ) *Special rule for floor stocks taxes.* A first return reporting only floor stocks taxes under this part 40 is also a final return.
[T.D. 8442, 57 FR 48177, Oct. 22, 1992, as amended by T.D. 8685, 61 FR 58005, Nov. 12, 1996; T.D. 8963, 66 FR 41776, Aug. 9, 2001]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 132 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 132

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Affirming that budget negotiations shall be based on the most recent 
 technical and economic assumptions of the Congressional Budget Office 
and shall achieve a balanced budget by fiscal year 2002 based on those 
                              assumptions.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 132

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Affirming that budget negotiations shall be based on the most recent 
 technical and economic assumptions of the Congressional Budget Office 
and shall achieve a balanced budget by fiscal year 2002 based on those 
                              assumptions.

Whereas on November 20 the President signed legislation (Public Law 104-56) 
        committing Congress and the President to ``enact legislation in the 
        first session of the 104th Congress to achieve a balanced budget not 
        later than fiscal year 2002 as estimated by the Congressional Budget 
        Office'';
Whereas Congress has approved legislation that achieves a balanced budget in 
        fiscal year 2002 as estimated by the Congressional Budget Office;
Whereas congressional Democrats have offered alternative budgets in the House 
        and Senate which also achieve balance in fiscal year 2002 as estimated 
        by the Congressional Budget Office;
Whereas the commitment to enact legislation in the first session of Congress 
        requires action now in negotiations;
Whereas the negotiations have no preconditions on levels of spending or 
        taxation, except that the resulting budget must achieve balance by 
        fiscal year 2002 as estimated by the Congressional Budget Office;
Whereas the Congressional Budget Office has updated its technical and economic 
        assumptions following a thorough consultation with government and 
        private experts; and
Whereas the Congressional Budget Office has begun consultation and review with 
        the Office of Management and Budget: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the current negotiations 
between Congress and the President shall be based on the most recent 
technical and economic assumptions of the Congressional Budget Office, 
and that the Congress is committed to reaching an agreement this year 
with the President on legislation that will achieve a balanced budget 
by fiscal year 2002 as estimated by the Congressional Budget Office.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 18 
      (legislative day, December 15), 1995.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Riverview Road

Riverview Road

Bike & Hike Trail

Buckeye & Towpath Trails

Valley Trail

Buckeye Trail

Oak Hill Trail

Plateau Trail

Salt Run Trail

Tree Farm Trail

Wetmore

Trails

Pine

Grove

Trail

Cross Country

Trail

Forest Point

Trail Ledges

Trail

Furnace

Run Trail

Riding

Run 

Trail Langes

Trail

Butlers Trail

1.2

1.0

2.5

0.6

0.8

0.7

1.3

1.8

1.4

0.9

0.3

.6

.5

0.1

3.1

2.3

.1

0.7

0.1

303

303

271

80

Stumpy

Basin

80

Brandywine

Road

Lock

32

Mile

 21 

Mile

22

Lock

31

Mile

23 Lock

30

Mile

24

Lock

28

Mile

25

River

Cuyahoga

Twinsburg Road

271

Major Road

Everett Road

Bolanz Road

Northampton Road

Wetmore Road

Truxell Road

Akron Pen ni su al Road

Boston Mills Road

Boston Mills Road

Stine Road

Hines Hill Road

Akron Peninsula Road

Wheatley Road

Oak

Hill Road

Akron Peninsula Road

Lock 29

Trailhead

Road Closed

Oak Hill Road

Furnace Run

Quick Road

Buckeye Trail

Connector Trails

Valley Bridle Trail

Towpath Trail

Other Trails

Cross Country Skiing

Trailer Parking

Restrooms

Picnic Area

Parking

Train Station

Park Boundary

Distance between

arrows (in miles) 0.2

0

0

1 Kilometer

1 Mile

PENINSULA

DEPOT

VISITOR CENTER

HUNT FARM

VISITOR 

INFORMATION

CENTER

BOSTON STORE

VISITOR CENTER

Blue Hen

Falls

Horseshoe

Pond

Boston

Happy Days

Lodge

Stanford

to 

Merriman Valley 

Restaurants

Wetmore 

Kendall Lake 

Octagon

Deep Lock

Quarry 

Trail Mix

Brandywine

Golf Course

Everett

Pine Lane

Trailhead

Everett Road

Covered

Bridge

Virginia

Kendall

Park Cuyahoga Valley Scenic Railroad

Peninsula

to 

Hale Farm

& Village

Map updated 8/2013.

Dining

National Park Service

U.S. Department of the Interior

Cuyahoga Valley National Park

Buckeye and Valley Trails

Boston to Everett

The Buckeye Trail is a statewide trail, 

marked with blue blazes. 

Portions of the trail use the 

Ohio & Erie Canal Towpath Trail. 

Loop Distances

Boston to Peninsula .......... 7.1 miles

Using Buckeye & Towpath Trails

Peninsula to Hunt Farm .... 9.4 miles

Using Valley, Towpath & Buckeye Trails
#### § 31.3502-1 Nondeductibility of taxes in computing taxable income.

For provisions relating to the nondeductibility, in computing taxable income under subtitle A, of the taxes imposed by sections 3101, 3201, and 3211, and of the tax deducted and withheld under chapter 24, see §§ 1.164-2 and 1.275-1 of this chapter (Income Tax Regulations). For provisions relating to the credit allowable to the recipient of the income in respect of the tax deducted and withheld under chapter 24, see § 1.31-1 of this chapter (Income Tax Regulations).

[T.D. 6780, 29 FR 18148, Dec. 22, 1964]
www.gpo.gov

### §263a. International Criminal Police Organization

The Attorney General is authorized to accept and maintain, on behalf of the United States, membership in the International Criminal Police Organization, and to designate any departments and agencies which may participate in the United States representation with that organization. All dues and expenses to be paid for the membership of the United States shall be paid out of sums authorized and appropriated for the Department of Justice.

(June 10, 1938, ch. 335, 52 Stat. 640; Pub. L. 85–768, Aug. 27, 1958, 72 Stat. 921; Pub. L. 90–159, Nov. 28, 1967, 81 Stat. 517; Pub. L. 92–380, §1, Aug. 10, 1972, 86 Stat. 531; Pub. L. 93–468, §1, Oct. 24, 1974, 88 Stat. 1422; Pub. L. 95–624, §21(a), Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3466.)

#### Amendments

1978—Pub. L. 95–624 substituted provision authorizing payment of all dues and expenses for membership of the United States out of sums authorized and appropriated for Department of Justice for provisions authorizing each participating department and agency to pay its pro rata share of expenses of such membership and forbidding total dues paid for such membership to exceed $120,000 per annum.

1974—Pub. L. 93–468 substituted “$120,000” for “$80,000”.

1972—Pub. L. 92–380 substituted “$80,000” for “$28,500”.

1967—Pub. L. 90–159 substituted “$28,500” for “$25,000”.

1958—Pub. L. 85–768 authorized the Attorney General to designate departments and agencies which may participate, on a pro rata share basis, in the United States representation with the International Criminal Police Organization, and increased from $1,500 to $25,000 per annum the amount of expenses which may be incurred by reason of United States membership.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 6498]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March                               ( print page 5205)                            27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects in the exhibition: “Art of the Korean Renaissance, 1400-1600,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, NY, from on or about March 17, 2009, until on or about June 21, 2009, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-453-8050). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

Dated: January 13, 2009.

C. Miller Crouch,

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. E9-1932 Filed 1-28-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****The sentinel [electronicresource].**
PDF-v.1,n.1|PDF_v1,n2|PDF-v.1,n3
PDF-v.2,n.1|PDF-v2,n2|PDF_v2,n3
PDF-GettysburgSentinel-150thAnniversaryIssue
 
SuDoc Number:I 29.2:SE 5/

Item Number: 0648 (online)

CGP systemNumber:000918803
October 2, 2018
#### Mary Byrne et al., Appellants, v City of New York et al., Defendants, and New York City Transit Authority, Respondent.

[803 NYS2d 922]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Mega, J.), dated October 14, 2004, which denied their motion to compel the defendant New York City Transit Authority to produce an additional witness for deposition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs’ motion to compel the New York City Transit Authority to produce an additional witness for deposition since the plaintiffs failed to make a detailed showing of the necessity for taking further depositions *(see Romero v Korn,*236 AD2d 598 [1997]; *Defina v Brooklyn Union Gas Co.,*217 AD2d 681, 682 [1995]; *Colicchio v City of New York,*181 AD2d 528, 529 [1992]). Adams, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein, Skelos and Dillon, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>      5
<MULTIPLIER>   1
<CURRENCY>     U.S. Dollars
<CIK>          0000857351
<NAME>         Universal Express, Inc.





<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                   JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                     SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                  1
<CASH>                                17,873
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                      1,255,425
<ALLOWANCES>                        (107,600)
<INVENTORY>                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   1,646,666
<PP&E>                               278,386
<DEPRECIATION>                       (63,887)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     4,901,425
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              7,257,593
<BONDS>                              810,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                             155,460
<OTHER-SE>                        (3,118,695)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       4,901,425
<SALES>                            1,741,095
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   1,741,095
<CGS>                              1,072,477
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      1,072,477
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   1,518,289
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    35,189
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (884,860)
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 (884,860)
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                        (884,860)
<EPS-BASIC>                            (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (0.04)


</TABLE>
§ 20.2046-1 Disclaimed property. ( a ) This section shall apply to the disclaimer or renunciation of an interest in the person disclaiming by a transfer made after December 31, 1976. For rules relating to when the transfer creating the interest occurs, see § 25.2518-2(c)(3) and (c)(4) of this chapter. If a qualified disclaimer is made with respect to such a transfer, the Federal estate tax provisions are to apply with respect to the property interest disclaimed as if the interest had never been transferred to the person making the disclaimer. See section 2518 and the corresponding regulations for rules relating to a qualified disclaimer.
( b ) The first and second sentences of this section are applicable for transfers creating the interest to be disclaimed made on or after December 31, 1997.
[T.D. 8744, 62 FR 68184, Dec. 31, 1997]
#### Robert Peterson, Respondent, v Adam Youngelman, Appellant.

[803 NYS2d 919]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Berler, J.), dated September 22, 2004, which denied his motion, among other things, pursuant to CPLR 325 (b) to remove to the Supreme Court three separate actions pending against him in the District Court, Suffolk County.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the three actions commenced by the plaintiff in the District Court, Suffolk County, in addition to the defendant’s proposed counterclaims, are within the jurisdiction of that court, irrespective of whether they qualify as “small claims” within the meaning of Uniform District Court Act (hereinafter UDCA) article 18 *(see*UDCA 202, 208 [b]; 1805 [b]; 2501). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the motion.

In light of our determination, we do not reach the defendant’s remaining contentions. Florio, J.P., Goldstein, Fisher and Covello, JJ., concur.