alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
July 1, 2015

Mr. Jeremy Ryan

High Flying Images

63 Coniston Road

Short Hills, NJ 07078

Dear Mr. Ryan:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption of 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your exemption request on behalf of High Flying Images, posted to the public 

docket on April 27, 2015, (No. FAA−2015−1209), but we are unable to process your request 

any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 

(copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the 

following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.
2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst, Aircraft and 

 Airport Rules Division

Enclosure
To view the full contents of this document, you need a later version of the PDF viewer. You can upgrade 

to the latest version of Adobe Reader from www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html 

For further support, go to www.adobe.com/support/products/acrreader.html
Order filed October 6, 2022 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-22-00591-CV

____________

JERROD HOYLE, Appellant

V.

507 HOSEA STREET LLC, A SEPERATE SERVICES OF EWALD 

INVESTMENTS LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law

Washington County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2022-101

O R D E R

The notice of appeal in this case was filed August 9, 2022. To date, the filing 

fee of $205.00 has not been paid. No evidence that appellant is excused by statute 

or the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure from paying costs has been filed. See

Tex. R. App. P. 5. 

Accordingly, appellant is ordered to pay the filing fee in the amount of 

$205.00 to the clerk of this court within ten (10) days of the date of this order. If 

appellant fails to do so, the appeal is subject to dismissal without further notice for 

want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Hassan.
TELEPHONE CONTACT SUMMARY – 0212783.005 

FROM: Karen Schaffner, RTI International 

DATE OF CONTACT: February 15 and 24, 2011 

ORGANIZATION CONTACTED: 

Tom Felleisen, Lead Chemical Engineer, Bulk Liquids and Gases, U.S. Coast Guard 

Other Participants: 

Steve Shedd, EPA 

Karen Schaffner, RTI 

TELEPHONE NUMBER: (202) 372-1424 

SUMMARY OF CONTACT 

The purpose of the conference call was to discuss several public comments received on 

the October 21, 2010 proposal rule for Risk and Technology Review (RTR) for marine 

tank vessel loading operations NESHAP. Specifically, one public comment noted that 

the cited section in the Coast Guard regulations in 46 CFR 153.282 was specific to ships 

only. 

In discussions with Mr. Felleisen, he noted that several sections in the Coast Guard 

regulations have requirements for submerged fill. He noted that 46 CFR part 32 is 

specific to ships and barges loading flammable and combustible commodities, part 151 is 

specific to barges loading hazardous commodities (other than flammable or combustible), 

and part 153 is specific to ships loading hazardous commodities (other than flammable or 

combustible). Under part 32, loading of combustible commodities must meet the 

requirements of part 153.282 for submerged fill for both ships and barges, and loading of 

flammable commodities does not have a submerged fill requirement. He noted that part 

151 for barges has a general, or vague, requirement for submerged fill that requires filling 

lines that lead to a “point at or near the bottom” (46 CFR 151.20-20(d)), and that part 153 

for ships has a more specific requirement for submerged fill that requires the filling line 

“must be no higher above the bottom of the cargo tank or sump than 10 cm (approx. 4 in.) 

or the radius of the filling line, whichever is greater” (46 CFR 153.282). He also noted 

that part 32 for ships and barges has a requirement for submerged fill for combustible 

commodities that cites the requirements in section 153.282 (46 CFR 32.50-15(a)(2)(v)), 

and for flammable commodities there is no submerged fill requirement at all. Despite the 

differences in requirements across varying sections of the Coast Guard regulations, Mr. 

Felleison indicated that as a practical matter, all loading operations for both ships and 

barges meet the loading requirements in 46 CFR 153.282, because tank vessel 

construction means that both ships and barges are built such that they would meet these 

requirements. As an example, even barge loading of gasoline, which would be subject as 
2 

a flammable commodity under part 32, would be loaded using submerged fill that would 

meet the requirement in section 153.282. Therefore, Mr. Felleisen indicated that the best 

approach may be to cite the section 153.282 for all ship and barge loading, since as a 

matter of practice, these requirements are being met by all vessels. He also noted that no 

additional retrofit cost would be required as these vessels would not need additional fill 

pipe equipment for retrofit.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Krupp Government Income Trust (the
"Trust") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alan
Reese, Chief Accounting Officer of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Trust as of June 30, 2004 (the last date of the period
            covered by the Report).


/s/ Alan Reese
--------------
Alan Reese
Chief Accounting Officer

Date: August 13, 2004


                                      -18-
EX-10.9



 






Exhibit 10.9




SUMMARY OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS



On February 22, 2007, the Executive Compensation Subcommittee
(“Subcommittee”) of the Company’s
Board of Directors approved an increase to the annual base salary (effective April 1, 2007) of Mr.
Crowley, the Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer, from
$846,300 to $876,000 and of Mr. Pennella (Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors and Executive
Vice President) from $435,000 to $450,660. The April 1, 2007 increase to annual base salary for
the other named executive officers included in the Summary Compensation Table in “Item 11.
Executive Compensation” of Part III of the Form 10-K has not yet been determined. The Subcommittee
also approved the criteria for the annual bonus awards for performance during 2007 for executive
officers whose annual compensation is in excess of $1.0 million. The funding of these awards can
range from 20% to 145% of base salary for Mr. Crowley and from 0% to 90% for Mr. Pennella. These
awards are based on the Company’s operating income as a percentage of
revenues (“Operating Margin”) and are
subject to modification based on individual performance and achievement. The Subcommittee also
approved the criteria for Deferred Compensation Plan awards during 2007 for executive officers
whose annual compensation is in excess of $1.0 million. The funding of these awards can range from
0% to 180% of base salaries for Mr. Crowley and from 25% to 90% for Mr. Pennella. The awards are
subject to modification based on individual performance and achievement.



On February 27, 2007, the Board of Directors approved the funding criteria for the annual bonus
awards for performance during 2007 to executive officers whose annual compensation is less than
$1.0 million. The funding of these awards can range from 0% to 60% of base salaries and are based
on the Company's Operating Margin and are subject to
modification based on individual performance and achievement. The Board of Directors also approved
the funding criteria to fund the Deferred Compensation Plan for performance during 2007 to
executive officers whose annual compensation is less than $1.0 million. The funding of these
awards can range from 0% to 80% of base salaries and are based on consolidated operating income as
a percentage of consolidated revenue and subject to modification based on individual performance
and achievement.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>  THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
  FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 AND THE
  CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED 
  SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                    59,521 
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                             69,814
<ALLOWANCES>                               5,670
<INVENTORY>                               43,132
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         189,901
<PP&E>                                    79,612
<DEPRECIATION>                            42,187 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           238,583
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     55,318
<BONDS>                                        0
<COMMON>                                      22
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                               182,436
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             238,583
<SALES>                                  277,277 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         277,277
<CGS>                                    239,945
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            239,945
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           7,094
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           151
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (26,614)
<INCOME-TAX>                             (10,912)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (15,702) 
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                             (15,702)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              (0.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (0.71)  
        

</TABLE>
Terms of Compensation Arrangement with Charlie Lesko



 Exhibit 10.33 
 Terms of Compensation 
  

			
	Name:	 	Charlie Lesko
		
	Title:	 	Senior Vice President, Sales and Marketing
		
	Base Salary:	 	290,000
		
	Bonus Plan:	 	$25,000 one-time net hire date bonus
		
		 	Eligible for participation in the company’s Key Manager Incentive Program and Sales Incentive Plan with combined target payout at 70% of base salary and a maximum payout of 150% of base
salary
		
	Equity Awards:	 	Eligible to participate in the Amended and Restated AMIS Holdings, Inc. 2000 Equity Incentive Plan.
		
	Health Benefits:	 	eligible for group insurance program consisting of a hospital, surgical, major medical, life, dependent life, accidental death insurance and dental plan, and an annual executive
physical
		
	401K:	 	company match of 50% of the employee’s first 6% contribution, not to exceed 50% of the 402(g) limit
		
	Relocation:	 	Relocation Assistance from Irvine, California to Dallas, Texas
		
	Severance Payments:	 	Change of control severance agreement provides that, in the event that the executive’s employment with the Company is involuntarily terminated, other than for cause or by reason of the
executive’s death or disability, within ninety days prior to or two years after a change of control, the Company shall pay to the executive the following benefits:
		
		 	 •     a lump sum payment in cash equal to the value of his earned but unpaid annual base salary and other
vested but unpaid cash entitlements through the termination date;

		
		 	 •     any other vested benefits earned through the termination date under any employee benefit plan or
arrangement maintained by the Company;

		
		 	 •     a cash payment in an amount equal to the sum of nine-twelfths of the executive’s then-current
annual base salary and then-current target bonus;

		
		 	 •     a cash payment in an amount equal to the cost to the executive to purchase COBRA benefits for the
eighteen month period after the termination.

		
		 	In addition, one-half of the executive’s then-outstanding equity awards will accelerate and become fully vested.
		
		 	Should the executive remain in the employ of the Company as of the day prior to the effective date of the change of control, the Company will also pay the executive a cash payment equal to
three-twelfths of the executive’s annual base salary in effect immediately prior to the change of control.
EXHIBIT 32.2    SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   The undersigned officer of Summit Financial Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and in connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 (the Report), that, to such officer's knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.      Date: May 5, 2004Blaise B. Bettendorf, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 
   The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Summit Financial Corporation and will be retained by Summit Financial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Registrant. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |   |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Neal Ludeke                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |   |   |        |
| Neal                    LudekeChief                    Financial Officer of RichmanHousing                    Credits Inc., general partnerof                    Richman Tax Credit Properties IIIL.P.,                    General Partner of the RegistrantMarch                    14, 2008 |   |   |        |

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.6161-1 Extension of time for paying tax.

For provisions concerning the extension of time for paying a particular tax or for paying an amount determined as a deficiency, see the regulations relating to such tax.
A NEW GENERATION OF TRACERS FOR SURFACE WATER AND GROUNDWATER FLOW 

Mieke Heyde 

H. Gregg Williams 

EnviroGene, Ltd. 

Tredomen Innovation & Technology Centre 

Tredomen Business Park 

Ystrad Mynach 

Hengoed CF82 7FQ UK 

Voice: 44 (0)8452 584365 

Fax: 44 (0)1443 819052 

http://www.envirogene.co.uk 

Kerry Sublette* 

University of Tulsa 

Tulsa, OK 

EnviroGene’s nanoparticle DNA-based tracers utilize novel polymer technology co-developed with the 

University of Nottingham and the University of Milan. The polymer is biocompatible (minimal toxicity) and 

biodegradable. As the tracers are DNA based, large numbers of unique tracers are available. 

Uniquely, the DNA-based tracers are capable of tracking the source of the pollution to a single point, or 

assessing what proportion of waste comes from multiple geographic sources, thereby enabling the 

resolution of pollution problems, and the validation of pollution models. 

EnviroGene has developed a range of particles with differing stabilities, suitable for applications including: 

– Fecal pollution source identification 

– Sewer leakage studies 

– Groundwater flow 

– Potable water connectivity studies 

– Generation, amendment and validation of environmental flow models. 

###
Exhibit 99.1

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Supplemental Information

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors

Owl Rock Capital Corporation:

We have audited and reported separately herein on the consolidated financial statements of Owl Rock Capital Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2021.

We have also previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB, the consolidated statements of assets and liabilities of the Company, including the consolidated schedules of investments as of December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017 and 2016, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016 (none of which is presented herein), and we expressed unqualified opinions on those consolidated financial statements.

The senior securities table included in Part II, Item 5 of the December 31, 2021 annual report on Form 10-K of the Company, under the caption “Senior Securities” (Senior Securities Table) has been subjected to audit procedures performed in conjunction with the audit of the Company’s respective consolidated financial statements. The Senior Securities Table is the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our audit procedures included determining whether the Senior Securities Table reconciles to the respective consolidated financial statements or the underlying accounting and other records, as applicable, and performing procedures to test the completeness and accuracy of the information presented in the Senior Securities Table. In forming our opinion on the Senior Securities Table, we evaluated whether the Senior Securities Table, including its form and content, is presented in conformity with instructions to Form N-2. In our opinion, the Senior Securities Table is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the respective consolidated financial statements as a whole.

/s/ KPMG LLP

New York, New York

February 23, 2022

----
----

Opinion of the 397th advisory committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions at its meeting on 17 October 2005 concerning a preliminary draft decision relating to Case COMP/38.281/B.2 — Raw Tobacco Italy

(2006/C 303/13)

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          45,064
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,005,064
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                84,829
<PP&E>                                          17,496
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,737
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,097,738
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          244,468
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,750
<COMMON>                                        21,834
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,829,686
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,097,738
<SALES>                                        174,837
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               174,837
<CGS>                                          173,388
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  173,388
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,909,588
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,907,546)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,907,546)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      (8,003)
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,915,549)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.17)


</TABLE>