alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

February 22, 2013

jam

Order 

February 22, 2013

146701 (38)

In re CHESTER PATTERSON

____________________________________

CHESTER PATTERSON, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 146701

COA: 307456

KENT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, 

Defendant-Appellee.

___________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it 

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be 

liable for filing fees. 

Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the 

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $70.00, shall submit a copy of this order 

with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned 

with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being 

filed in this Court.

If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly 

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of 

the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of 

$305.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court.

Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in this 

Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. 

The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and 

return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.6215-1 Assessment of deficiency found by Tax Court.

Where a petition has been filed with the Tax Court, the entire amount redetermined as the deficiency by the decision of the Tax Court which has become final shall be assessed by the district director or the director of the regional service center and the unpaid portion of the amount so assessed shall be paid by the taxpayer upon notice and demand therefor.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Portable generator safety[electronic resource] : protect yourself = Seguridad de generados port�tiles :prot�jase.**
 
English | Espanol
 
SuDoc Number:L 35.2:P 94
Item Number:0765 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000625005
 
December 28, 2017
EXHIBIT
31.2














RULE
13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002















I, Blaise
B. Bettendorf, certify that:




1.
    I
      have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Summit Financial
      Corporation;   2.
    Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;   3.
    Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
      registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;   4.
    The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and have:   a)
    Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;   b)
    Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures
      and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
      the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
      covered by this report based on such evaluation; and   c)
    Disclosed
      in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent
      fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting; and   5.
    The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
      most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
      the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of
      directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):   a)
    All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and   b)
    Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control
      over financial reporting.  Date:
      May 11, 2005Blaise
      B. Bettendorf, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
      Officer
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Fl  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Trust and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 6, 2016, by andamong DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, AEGON USA REALTYADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asTrustee, and WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as CertificateAdministrator, Paying Agent and Custodian with respect to Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates, Hudson Yards 2016-10HY Mortgage Trust (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.07 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the Master Servicer during the period from August 6, 2016 through December31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreementduring such period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2015, byand among GS MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORPORATION II, as Depositor, MIDLAND LOANSERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer,WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, SITUS HOLDINGS,LLC as Operating Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asCertificate Administrator and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asTrustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series2015-GS1 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwisedefined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.07 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Marthinsen, Managing Director of Special Servicing dohereby certify that:

 

1.            A review of the activities of the Special Servicer during the period fromJanuary 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”),and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made undermy supervision, and

 

2.            To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Marthinsen

Daniel Marthinsen

Managing Director

Wells Fargo Bank

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
Searched for **http://www.ncua.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.ncua.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q OF
BERLITZ INTERNATIONAL, INC. FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000856529
<NAME>                        Berlitz International, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          29,304
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,643
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,067
<INVENTORY>                                     10,134
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               113,307
<PP&E>                                          77,036
<DEPRECIATION>                                  31,096
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 695,277
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           99,882
<BONDS>                                          6,260
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,003
<OTHER-SE>                                     344,676
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   695,277
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               335,041
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  200,467
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,357
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,261
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,423
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,506
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3,961)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (2,153)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (6,114)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.64)


</TABLE>
In Reply Refer to:

NG 0320 12

20 March 2012

The Honorable Ray LaHood

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Subject: Alaska Airlines ’ Application for SAN

- DCA, Docket No. DOT

- O ST

- 2012

- 0029

Dear Secretary LaHood:

N orthrop Grumman fully supports the application of Alaska Airlines for air service

between San Diego and Washington Reagan Nati onal Ai rport (DCA) . San Diego is the

largest region without direct service to DCA

. Additionally, due to the profound

community of interest between San Diego and th e nation’s capital, the region

generates the largest passenger market demand without nonstop service to the

convenient and close

- in airport serving our nation’s capital

.

San Diego’s sheer market size to Washington

, coupled with the fact that San Diego to

Dulles average airfares are the highest of west coast cities

, s hould qualify for the limited

slots available for this flight

. The high airfare is exacerbated when factoring in taxi fares

from Dulles to Washington’s city center that average about $ 6 0 each way. This means

travelers between Washington’s city center and San Diego via Dulles can pay on average

close to $400 one

- way

.

There are also countless other San Diego

- based and Washington

- based busines ses that

are engaged in health science, telecommunications, and national defense that need quick

and convenient access to Reagan National Airport. Northrop Grumman has an

immediate need for additional nonstop air service to our nation’s capital. Alask a Airlines

service would add a needed nonstop option to a primary gateway to Washington, DC.

Northrop Grumman joins with the San Diego County Regional Airport Authority, the San

Diego Regional Economic Development Corporation, the World Trade Center Sa n Diego, and the San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce in support of Alaska Airlines’

application for San Diego

– Washington Reagan National slots.NG 0320 12

2 0 March 2012

The Honorable Ray LaHood Page 2 of 2

We thank the Department of Transportation for the opportunity to comment on the above

referenced docket an d we hope to hear of a favorable review of Alaska Airlines’ San

Diego

– DCA proposal soon.

Sincerely

,

J im Zortman

S ector Vice President

Life Cycle Logistics and Support

Northrop Grumman Corporation

Site Manager, Unmanned Systems
Schedule of Executive Officer Compensation



 Exhibit 10.47 
 Schedule of Executive Compensation 
 Effective January 1, 2006, and pursuant to the annual review of base salary
compensation approved by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors, base salaries for its named executive officers were increased to the amounts shown in the table below: 
  

							
	 Name
	  	 Position
	  	 Currency of
Salary
	  	Revised Annual Base
Salary Effective
January 1, 2006
	 Dr. David Fyfe
	  	Chief Executive Officer	  	U. S. Dollars	  	480,690
	 Daniel Abrams (1)
	  	Chief Financial Officer	  	British Pounds	  	187,775
	 Michael Black (2)
	  	Vice-President Finance	  	British Pounds	  	106,000
	 Dr. Jeremy Burroughes
	  	Chief Technical Officer	  	British Pounds	  	159,805
	 Dr. SB Cha (3)
	  	Vice-President, Commercial	  	U. S. Dollars	  	280,000
	 Dr. Scott Brown
	  	Vice-President, Research	  	British Pounds	  	164,743
	 Stephen Chandler (4)
	  	Vice-President, Legal and Intellectual Property	  	British Pounds	  	200,619



	(1)	Mr. Abrams ceased to be an employee of the Company effective June 30, 2006 


	(2)	Mr. Black became a named executive officer effective July 3, 2006 and the salary shown was effective from that date 


	(3)	Dr. Cha entered into a new employment agreement with us effective February 1, 2006 and the salary shown was effective from that date. 


	(4)	Mr. Chandler ceased to be a named executive officer effective December 31, 2006 

 Effective January 1, 2007, and pursuant to the annual review of base salary compensation approved by the Compensation Committee of the
Company’s Board of Directors, the base salary for one named executive officer was increased to the amount shown in the table below: 
  

							
	 Name
	  	 Position
	  	 Currency of
Salary
	  	Revised Annual Base
Salary Effective
January 1, 2007
	 Jim Veninger
	  	Vice-President, Technology Development	  	British Pounds	  	160,000
#### § 31.3401(a)(2)-1 Agricultural labor.

The term “wages” does not include remuneration for services which constitute agricultural labor as defined in section 3121(g). For regulations relating to the definition of the term “agricultural labor”, see § 31.3121(g)-1.
39587.

#### SURMIAK v. STANDARD ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

Decided September 5, 1962.

*Joel Willis, Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*Philip Taylor, Harris, Russell ■& Watkins,*contra.

Felton, Chief Judge.

Where the claimant sustained an injury which resulted in a partial loss of the use of a leg for which she received compensation under an agreement, and where a deputy director, following a hearing under *Code*§ 114-709 for change of condition, awarded her compensation under *Code*§ 114-404, based upon his finding of total incapacity, and where the full board’s finding of 50% disability, with no superadded injury, disease or disability affecting other portions of claimant’s body, was supported by competent evidence, the full board did not err in making its award based upon *Code Ann.*§ 114-406 (o) and the court below did not err in its judgment affirming the board’s award. See *New Amsterdam Cas. Co. v. Brown,*81 Ga. App. 790 (1) (60 SE2d 245); *National Surety Corp. v. Nelson,*99 Ga. App. 95 (1) (107 SE2d 718); *National Surety Corp. v. Martin,*86 Ga. App. 77 (71 SE2d 666), and citations.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bell and Hall, JJ., concur.*
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 20-1168V

UNPUBLISHED

DONNA E. MAESTAS,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: November 9, 2021

Special Processing Unit (SPU); 

Vaccine Rule 21(a); Order 

Concluding Proceedings

Robert P. Goodwin, Walsh Roberts & Grace, Buffalo, NY, for Petitioner.

Claudia Barnes Gangi, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS1

On October 26, 2021, Petitioner filed a joint stipulation to voluntarily dismiss this 

case. Accordingly, pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a), the above-captioned case is hereby 

dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is hereby instructed that a 

judgment shall not enter in the instant case pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master

1 Because this unpublished order contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required 

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act 

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government 

Services). This means the order will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance 

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, 

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that 

the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of Owl Rock Capital Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to the undersigned’s knowledge: 

 

1) the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) as applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

2) the information contained in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

| Date: February 19, 2020 |   | By:    | /s/ Craig W. Packer |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|--------------------------|
|                    |   |   | Craig W. Packer          |
|                    |   |   | Chief Executive Officer  |
I EPA Region 9 SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST To evaluate compliance with 40 CFR 51, AppendixV

Complete Incomplete NotApplicable To Rule Material Missing

4401 4605 ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS (perAppendixV, Section 2.1)

(a) Submittal letterfrom Governor/designee X X (b) Evidence ofadoption X X (c) State/District legal authority to adopt X X (dl) Copy ofactual rule/plan X X (d2) Rule changes indicated by underline/cross-out X X (e) Proofthat action met procedural requirements X X (f) Copy ofpublic notice X X (g) Certification thathearing fulfilled public notice 

## x x (h) Public comments & agency response X X TECHNICAL SUPPORT (perAppendixV, Section 2.2)

(a) Regulated pollutants identified 

## x x (b) Affected sources & attainment status identified X X (c) Rule/plan emissions impact N/A N/A (d) Attainment, PSD & otherrequired demonstration N/A N/A (e) Modeling support as appropriate N/A N/A (f) Reliance on continuous emission reductions X X (g) Evidence oflimits & other needed requirements X X (i) Justification fordeviation from EPA policy N/A N/A
OVERALL COMPLETENESS C C Submittal Date July 28, 2011 District Name San Joaquin Valley APCD Date Reviewed August2, 2011 EPA Reviewer C.G. Allen Key:

N!A= 0 =

Notes: