alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Tian Xing Xing, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[803 NYS2d 283]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 1, 2005, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insur*748anee benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant worked as a houseman in the housekeeping department of a hotel for 14 years and was responsible for delivering linens and performing general cleaning. On July 29, 2004, claimant was directed to clean a room that had undergone repainting, but when the director of housekeeping checked the room, it had not been cleaned. Claimant, who had received prior warnings concerning his failure to perform his job assignments, was fired as a result. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board found, among other things, that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he was terminated due to misconduct. Claimant now appeals.

We affirm. An employee’s failure to comply with an employer’s reasonable request, despite repeated warnings, can constitute disqualifying misconduct *(see Matter of Pearlstein*[Engstrand—*Commissioner of Labor],*16 AD3d 947, 947 [2005]). Here, the director of housekeeping testified that claimant failed to clean the room as instructed and had been uncooperative in completing past assignments. Claimant had been warned on July 2, 2004 that if his work performance did not improve, he would be fired. In view of the foregoing, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision. Claimant’s contrary testimony that he, in fact, cleaned the room as requested presented a credibility issue for the Board to resolve *(see id.*at 948).

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Spain, Carpinello and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
The Honorable Garnett Thomas Eisele, United States District

1

Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

___________

No. 95-3818

___________

Delanor Berry; Jack Bennett; *

Elmer Jackson; John Hutson; *

Perry Scroggins; Ricky Armstrong,*

 *

Appellants, * Appeal from the United States

 * District Court for the

v. * Eastern District of Arkansas.

 *

The City of Little Rock, * [UNPUBLISHED]

 *

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: July 3, 1996

 Filed: August 23, 1996

___________

Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal from the district court's dismissal of their 42

1

U.S.C. § 1983 claim against the City of Little Rock, Arkansas, in which

they challenged the constitutionality of Local Ordinance 16,659 and its

application. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs,

we conclude that the district court's dismissal of the complaint was

correct, and that an opinion on these matters would have no precedential

value.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th

Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection
with the Annual Report of SINORAMA CORPORATION (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2016,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, ZHAO Hongxi, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|/s/ ZHAO Hongxi         |  | Date: March 31, 2017
|----------------------- |  | --------------------
|ZHAO Hongxi             |  |                     
|Chief Financial Officer |  |
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage Servicing**D1086-120, 12th Floor550 South Tyron StreetCharlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2015, by and among CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIAITON, as Special Servicer, PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Operating Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C4 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.07 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from November 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President 

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
H. J. Res. 198

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

Joint Resolution

Appointing the day for the convening of the first session of the One Hundred

Fifth Congress and the day for the counting in Congress of the electoral votes

for President and Vice President cast in December 1996.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DATE FOR CONVENING OF THE ONE HUNDRED FIFTH

CONGRESS.

The first regular session of the One Hundred Fifth Congress

shall begin at noon on Tuesday, January 7, 1997.

SEC. 2. DATE FOR COUNTING 1996 ELECTORAL VOTES IN CONGRESS.

The meeting of the Senate and House of Representatives to

be held in January 1997 pursuant to section 15 of title 3, United

States Code, to count the electoral votes for President and Vice

President cast by the electors in December 1996 shall be held

on January 9, 1997 (rather than on the date specified in the

first sentence of that section).

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
### Eleventh Court of Appeals Mandate

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS

T O T HE 35 TH D ISTRICT C OURT O F B ROWN C OUNTY

, G REETINGS :

BEFORE our Court of Appeals for the Eleventh District of Texas, on January 5, 2018, the cause

upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Rolando Santamaria

11th Court of Appeals No. 11-17-00064-CR and

35th District Court Case No. CR24605

The State of Texas

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

“ 

### This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion,

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed. "

WHEREFORE WE COMMAND YOU To observe the order of our said Court of

Appeals for the Eleventh District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

W ITNESS

, the H ON

. J OHN M. B AILEY

, Justice of this said Court, with the seal

thereof annexed at the City of Eastland, on

March 6, 2018.

S HERRY W ILLIAMSON

, C LERK

By: Myrna McGough, Deputy
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.7701-10 District director.

The term *district director* means the district director of internal revenue for an internal revenue district. The term also includes the Assistant Commissioner (International).

[32 FR 15241, Nov. 3, 1967, as amended by T.D. 8411, 57 FR 15241, Apr. 27, 1992]
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 72 (Monday, April 15, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 22198]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-08694]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R04-OAR-2012-0961; FRL-9802-8]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Charlotte, Raleigh/Durham and Winston Salem Carbon Monoxide Limited 
Maintenance Plan

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Withdrawal of direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Due to the receipt of a comment, EPA is voluntarily 
withdrawing the February 22, 2013, direct final rule to approve North 
Carolina's August 2, 2012, state implementation plan (SIP) submission 
for the limited maintenance plan showing continued attainment of the 8-
hour carbon monoxide (CO) National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) 
for the Charlotte, Raleigh/Durham and Winston-Salem Areas. EPA will 
consider this comment and will address the comment as appropriate and 
take final action at a later time. EPA will not institute a second 
comment period on this action.

DATES: The direct final rule published at 78 FR 12238 on February 22, 
2013, is withdrawn as of April 15, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Wong, Regulatory Development 
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management 
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth 
Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The telephone number is (404) 
562-8726. Mr. Wong can be reached via electronic mail at 
wong.richard@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 22, 2013 (78 FR 12238), EPA 
proposed to approve North Carolina's August 2, 2012, SIP submission. 
The limited maintenance plan update is for the maintenance areas 
showing continued attainment of the 8-hour CO NAAQS for the Charlotte, 
Raleigh/Durham and Winston-Salem Areas. In the direct final rule, EPA 
stated that if adverse comments were received by March 25, 2013, the 
rule would be withdrawn and not take effect. On March 25, 2013, EPA 
received a comment. The comment could be interpreted as adverse and, 
therefore, EPA is withdrawing the direct final rule. EPA will address 
the comment, as appropriate, in a subsequent final action based upon 
the proposed rulemaking action, also published on February 22, 2013 (78 
FR 12267). EPA will not institute a second comment period on this 
action.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: April 3, 2013.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.

0
Accordingly, the amendment to 40 CFR 52.1770 which published in the 
Federal Register on February 22, 2013, at 78 FR 12243 is withdrawn as 
of April 15, 2013.

[FR Doc. 2013-08694 Filed 4-12-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
#### Terrence Green, Appellant, v Grenadier Realty Corp. et al., Respondents.

[804 NYS2d 97]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jackson, J.), dated June 28, 2004, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. In support of their motion, the defendants presented evidence establishing, prima facie, that the metal plate on which the plaintiff slipped during a sleet storm was not inherently dangerous and was readily observable by the use of one’s senses *(see Cupo v Karfunkel,*1 AD3d 48, 52 [2003]; *Gibbons v Lido & Point Lookout Fire Dist.,*293 AD2d 646, 647 [2002]; *Gibbons v Lido & Point Lookout Fire Dist.,*293 AD2d 647, 648 [2002]; *Plessias v Scalia*
      *347
      *Home for Funerals,*271 AD2d 423 [2000]). In response to the defendants’ demonstration of entitlement, prima facie, to judgment as a matter of law, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Florio, J.P., Crane, Mastro and Rivera, JJ, concur.
450

450

450

450

550

450

450

500

500

450

500

500

450

450

450

400

500

450

450

16

16

16

16

D O R A C E

G O O D M A N

R D

D O R A C E

G O O D M A N

R D

D O R A C E G O O D M A N R D

H AY E S R D

16

16

16

16

D O R A C E

G O O D M A N

R D

D O R A C E

G O O D M A N

R D

D O R A C E G O O D M A N R D

H AY E S R D

Escobas Creek

Fandango Creek

Tejones Creek

Escobas Creek

Tejones Creek

Taquache

Creek

Taquache Creek

quache Creek

Escobas Creek

Taquache Creek

Tejones

Creek

Escobas

Creek

Rancho

Viejo Tank

La Mota Tank

Crudos

Tank

Salómoneno

Tank

Cerrito

Blanco Tank

Negras Tank

Cerritos

Tank

Vidal Tank

Burros

Tank

Indias Tank

Escobas

Bustamante

Tom East

Lake

Dam

Garza Lake

Number

2 Dam

Lauro Garza Lake

Number 1 Dam

Cameron

Cemetery

Gracia

Cemetery

Arroyo

Huisache

Las

Ovejas

Creek

Escobas

Arroyo

Veleño

Mogotes

Hill

Thompsonville

Guerra

Randado

Chargos

Creek

790 000

MR

MQ

99°00'

30"

99°

30"

30" 5'

00'

99° 2'

30"

99°00'

27° 27°07'

07'

27°

07'

30" 2'

27°

30"

5'

00'

07'

2'30"

5'

2'

5'

30"

E

29 29

4

4

000m

000m 4

30

4 4

29

4 4

29

29

29

4

29

4

000m

29

29

29

29

4

29 29

29

4

29

4

29

29

4

30

4 4

000m

4

4

29

4

4

29

29

4

4 4

29

29

29

4

90

93

93

94

97

00

94

88

91

93

89

89

92

87

95

99

N

97

92

96

95

N

88 97

98

90

98

E

95

89

89

87

91

98

92

94

98

88

94

93

96

90

99

97

96

92

95

99

90

00

88

000

FEET

000

16

FEET

FEET

16

MQ

MR

FEET

000

890

930

820

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

TEXAS

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

TX 2799-111

ESCOBAS, TX

2010

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Interstate Route US Route State Route

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

ESCOBAS QUADRANGLE

TEXAS

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Zone 14R

Imagery......................................................NAIP, April 2008

Roads.....................................US Census Bureau TIGER data

with limited USGS updates, 2008

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2008

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 1995

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2004

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator,

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Texas Coordinate System of 1983

(south zone)

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is also draft version 0.5.10

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0 1

MILES

MN

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

GN

UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 2 ́

1 MILS

5° 27 ́

97 MILS

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

14R

MQ

MR 30 00

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988
----

Notification according to Article 95 (4) of the EC Treaty

Withdrawal of a request to maintain national legislation derogating from the provisions of a Community Harmonisation Measure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/C 314/10)

----

(1)OJ L 304, 21.11.2003, p. 1.

(2)  Decree No 474/2000 setting down requirements for fertilisers.

(3)OJ L 150, 3.6.2006, p. 17.

(4)  http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_scher/scher_opinions_en.htm

----
<PAGE>




                                  Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Milestone Scientific Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the Nine months ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Leonard
Osser, Chief Executive Officer of Milestone, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of Milestone.


                              /s/ Leonard Osser
                              ----------------------
                              Leonard Osser
                              Chief Executive Officer
                              November 14, 2006
Searched for **http://www.eeoc.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.eeoc.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                       DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                          JUL-02-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                            SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                        2,182
<SECURITIES>                                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                17,708
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    402
<INVENTORY>                                                  22,854
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             45,474
<PP&E>                                                       61,307
<DEPRECIATION>                                               25,448
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               89,568
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        23,932
<BONDS>                                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                             0
<PREFERRED>                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                      5,435
<OTHER-SE>                                                        0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 89,568
<SALES>                                                      25,770
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             25,770
<CGS>                                                        22,887
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                27,199
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               (446)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              706
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              (1,689)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    164
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                               0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                   0
<CHANGES>                                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 (1,853)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                   (0.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 (0.34)




</TABLE>
Williams, Renee (OST) ^01^ QS 7"^ /^ f ^ ~ ^S^^L 

From: John Stevens [stevens.john709@gmail.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 9:35 PM 

To: EAS (OST) 

Subject: Massena, NY Essential Air Service 

Mr. Devany, 

I would like to show my support of Cape air for the following reasons. 

1. Cape Air is offering more frequent service, 21 per week versus 12 per 

week for Gulfstream. 

2. Gulfstream is asking for an annual subsidy nearly one million dollars 

more than Cape Air (Gulfstream-$2,518,485 vs. Cape Air $1,519,732.) That 

is one million dollars that we as taxpayers cant afford to spend. 

3. Cape Air will fly to Albany, and is also offering Boston. I agree 

Boston has more connections, and travelers will be able to continue onto 

Boston on Cape Air. 

4. Noted in the Massena paper, of the 60 responses to the Business 

Development Corporation's survey, the majority chose Albany as their 

preferred destination. 

5. Cape Air has provided reliable and courteous service to it's passengers 

over the last two years. 

6. Gulfstream only proposes a single flight on the weekends. This will make it 

difficult if not impossible to make connecting flights. 

V.According to Guifstream's public financial reports, they are on the verge of 

bankruptcy. 

Thank You, 

John Stevens 

Madrid, NY
#### § 48.4161(a) [Reserved]