alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.2







CONSENT OF WEIR INTERNATIONAL, INC.





Weir International, Inc., as independent mining engineers and geologists, hereby consents to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-215913) of (i) the use of our firm’s name and references to us as experts and (ii) the use of our reserves and resource studies (and inclusion of information contained therein) relating to the proven and probable coal reserves of Ramaco Resources, Inc.’s (the “Company”) Berwind, RAM Mine, Knox Creek and Elk Creek properties, which appear in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.







| | WEIR INTERNATIONAL, INC. |                   
| | ------------------------ | ------------------
| |                          |                   
| |                          |                   
| | By:                      | /s/ Fran X. Taglia
| |                          |                   
| |                          |                   





March 22, 2017
1 | Building Technologies Program eere.energy.gov 

# Example: Cost

- Efficiency data and CSLs for DL7 (75 kVA, 1

- phase)

$500 $1,500 $2,500 $3,500 $4,500 $5,500 $6,500 $7,500 $8,500 $9,500

97.80% 98.00% 98.20% 98.40% 98.60% 98.80% 99.00% 99.20% 99.40% 99.60%Manufacturer Selling Price ($)

Efficiency at 35% Load, Temperature Corrected M12_AlAl_bl_3leg M12_CuAl_bl_3leg M6_AlAl_bl_3leg M6_AlAl_fm_3leg M4_CuAl_fm_3leg M3_AlAl_fm_3leg M3_AlAl_slm_3leg M3_AlAl_dgw_3leg H0_AlAl_fm_3leg H0_AlAl_slm_3leg ZDMH_AlAl_dgw_3leg H0_CuCu_fm_3leg SA1_AlAl_dgw_5leg SA1_CuCu_dgw_5leg

CSLs CSL 0 CSL 1 CSL 2 CSL 3

NEMA Pr. CSL 4 CSL 5 CSL 6 CSL 72 | Building Technologies Program eere.energy.gov 

# • National impacts depend on the choice of TSL

– Energy savings

– Net present economic value

– Emissions and social cost of carbon

– Manufacturer impacts

– Demand for new materials



# • Certain TSLs are analyzed for most rule

- making processes

– “Max Tech” required by law

– Maximum NPV (typically the minimum LCC)

– Maximum energy savings with non

- negative LCC



# • Additional TSLs are defined as appropriate

– Technology break

- points

– Fill in gaps in the design space 

# Analysis Results for draft TSLs3 | Building Technologies Program eere.energy.gov 

# • TSLs so far

–

– MAX TECH, (COMPLETE)

– MAX NET PRESENT VALUE, (COMPLETE)

– MAXIMUM ENERGY SAVINGS WITH POSITIVE LIFE CYCLE COST, BASELINE (no standard standard), (COMPLETE)

– HIGHEST ENERGY SAVINGS WITH MULTIPLE CORE

MATERIAL SUPPLIERS

,

– HIGHEST ENERGY SAVINGS WITH MULTIPLE COMPETITIVE CORE MATERIAL SUPPLIERS,

– SOME ASPECT OF ANNUAL ELECTRICITY BILL SAVINGS ( eg , 30% OR 50%),

– GAP FILL AS NECESSARY. 

# Potential TSLs
§ 31.3406(h)-1 Definitions. ( a ) *In general.* For purposes of section 3406 and the regulations thereunder, the definitions of this section apply.
( b ) *Taxpayer identification number* — ( 1 ) *In general. Taxpayer identification number* means the identifying number assigned to a person under section 6109 (relating to identifying numbers, generally a nine-digit social security number for an individual and a nine-digit employer identification number for a nonindividual, e.g., a corporation, partnership, trust, or estate). An obviously incorrect number is not considered a taxpayer identification number. See § 31.6011(b)-2 and § 301.6109-1 of this chapter for provisions relating to obtaining a taxpayer identification number.
( 2 ) *Obviously incorrect number. Obviously incorrect number* means a number that does not contain nine digits or a number that includes an alpha character as one of the nine digits.
( c ) *Broker. Broker* is defined in section 6045(c)(1) and § 1.6045-1(a)(1) of this chapter. If there could be more than one broker with respect to any acquisition, only the broker having the closest contact (as determined under 1.6045-1(c)(3)(iii) and (iv) of this chapter) with the payee is treated as a broker. In the case of any instrument, the term *broker* does not include any person who is the payor with respect to the instrument as described in § 31.3406(a)-2.
( d ) *Readily tradable instrument. Readily tradable instrument* means— ( 1 ) Any instrument that is part of an issue any portion of which is traded on an established securities market (within the meaning of section 453(f)(5)); or
( 2 ) Any instrument that is regularly quoted by brokers or dealers making a market.
( e ) *Day. Day* means a calendar day unless specified otherwise under any section of the regulations under section 3406. For example, see §§ 31.3406(d)-5(a) and 31.3406(g)-3(a)(2).
( f ) *Business day. Business day* means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday (within the meaning of section 7503).
[T.D. 8637, 60 FR 66130, Dec. 21, 1995; 61 FR 12135, Mar. 25, 1996, as amended by T.D. 9010, 67 FR 48760, July 26, 2002]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 208 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  2d Session
H.CON. RES. 208

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 2, 1996

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
     Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make a 
               correction in the enrollment of H.R. 3103.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 3103), to amend the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 to improve portability and continuity of health 
insurance coverage in the group and individual markets, to combat 
waste, fraud, and abuse in health insurance and health care delivery, 
to promote the use of medical savings accounts, to improve access to 
long-term care services and coverage, to simplify the administration of 
health insurance, and for other purposes, the Clerk of the House of 
Representatives shall make the following correction:
            Strike subtitle H of title II of the bill and the items 
        corresponding to such subtitle in the table of contents of the 
        bill in section 1(b).

            Passed the House of Representatives August 2, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.

                              By Linda Nave,

                                                          Deputy Clerk.
```
P.1 

OAR Box 1781 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

82) IV-B-6 

Docket Number: 

A-90-37 

Printed 10/29/2008 10:46:21 AM Sheet 82 of 142 
P.2 

From: SAMPORTANOVA 

To: RTP3.RTMU542.CRUMPLER-DENNIS 

Date: 11/2/9810:10am 

Subject: Top Down BACT 

Dennis, here's one recent instance of where top-down BACT proved beneficial. This was for a 

British Petroleum PSD permit in Ohio. 

> » STEVEN GORG 10/29/98 08:17am > » 

The only example I can think of is really a response to those that are pushing to eliminate the 

"top down" approach. Referring to my most recent BP experience, BP was asked to perform a 

top down analysis as outlined in the NSR Workshop Manual to provide the necessary 

information to justify the decision making process of the BACT determination. Without that 

analysis, I highly doubt a majority of the public (non-engineers) would be able to understand 

why a technology was chosen over the other. In fact, a majority of the public did not imderstand 

the BACT determination as the initial BP permit did not have a top down approach. This initial 

permit resulted in numerous comments from members of the public, comments which could have 

been avoided if a proper analysis was performed in the first place. 

In my opinion, permits should be written so that anyone can pick them up and understand the 

reasoning behind BACT determinations and I feel the top down analysis provides that. Just my 

two cents. 

CC: GORG-STEVEN
§ 25.6011-4 Requirement of statement disclosing participation in certain transactions by taxpayers. ( a ) *In general.* If a transaction is identified as a *listed transaction* or a *transaction of interest* as defined in § 1.6011-4 of this chapter by the Commissioner in published guidance (see § 601.601(d)(2)(ii)( b ) of this chapter), and the listed transaction or transaction of interest involves a gift tax under chapter 12 of subtitle B of the Internal Revenue Code, the transaction must be disclosed in the manner stated in such published guidance.
( b ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section applies to listed transactions entered into on or after January 1, 2003. This section applies to transactions of interest entered into on or after November 2, 2006.
[T.D. 9350, 72 FR 43153, Aug. 3, 2007]
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1523

SUSAN J. BEARNS, Plaintiff – Appellant,

v. JAMES E. POTTER, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (8:06-cv-03085-DKC)
Submitted: January 8, 2010 Decided: February 9, 2010

Before MOTZ and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sheldon L. Gnatt, KNIGHT, MANZI, NUSSBAUM & LAPLACA, P.A., Upper Marlboro, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Michael P. Grady, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: Susan J. Bearns appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendant in Bearns’s civil action. On appeal, Bearns contends the district court erred in granting summary judgment to the Defendant on her retaliation and hostile work environment claims. We affirm. We review a district court’s grant of summary judgment
de novo. Jennings v. U.N.C. , 482 F.3d 686, 694 (4th Cir. 2007) (en banc). “At the summary judgment stage, facts must be viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party only if there is a ‘genuine’ dispute as to those facts.” Scott v. Harris , 550 U.S. 372, 380 (2007) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c)). Summary judgment “should be rendered if the pleadings, the discovery and disclosure materials on file, and any affidavits show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c). “[T]here is no issue for trial unless there is sufficient evidence favoring the nonmoving party for a jury to return a verdict for that party.” Anderson v. Liberty Lobby,

Inc. , 477 U.S. 242, 249-50 (1986). With these standards in mind, we have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Bearns v. Potter , No. 8:06-cv-03085-DKC (D. Md.

23 Mar. 6, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


             Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an
officer of ACG Holdings, Inc. and American Color Graphics, Inc., (collectively
the "Company") that the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information
contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:    August 9, 2005                   /s/ Stephen M. Dyott
      -------------------------           --------------------------------------
                                              Stephen M. Dyott
                                              Chief Executive Officer


Date:    August 9, 2005                   /s/ Patrick W. Kellick
      -------------------------           --------------------------------------
                                              Patrick W. Kellick
                                              Chief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Juan Sampel, Appellant.

[803 NYS2d 498]

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (John J. Connell, J), rendered December 6, 2002. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree (Penal Law § 220.18) and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of seven years to life imprisonment. On appeal, defendant contends that he has been denied equal protection of the law under the Rockefeller Drug Law Reform Act ([Act] L 2004, ch 738) and that the Act therefore is unconstitutional. We dismiss the appeal because defendant fails to raise any contention with respect to an “error or defect in the criminal court proceedings” resulting in the judgment from which he appealed (CPL 470.15 [1]; *see generally*CPL 470.60 [1]). Present—Scudder, J.P., Martoche, Pine, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.
# Europeiska unionens C 29A/9 fe

| | ISSN 1725-2504 |
| --- | --- |
| Europeiska unionens
  officiella tidning | C 29A |
| | |
| Svensk utgåva | Meddelanden och upplysningar | 50 årgången9 februari 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2504

Europeiska unionens

officiella tidning

C 29A

Svensk utgåva

Meddelanden och upplysningar

50 årgången9 februari 2007

---

| Informationsnummer | Innehållsförteckning | Sida |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Yttranden |
| | ADMINISTRATIVA FÖRFARANDEN |
| | Europeiska kemikaliemyndigheten |
| 2007/C 029A/01 | Utlysning av en tjänst som verkställande direktör vid Europeiska kemikaliemyndigheten i Helsingfors (lönegrad AD 15) | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Innehållsförteckning

Sida

V   Yttranden

ADMINISTRATIVA FÖRFARANDEN

Europeiska kemikaliemyndigheten

2007/C 029A/01

Utlysning av en tjänst som verkställande direktör vid Europeiska kemikaliemyndigheten i Helsingfors (lönegrad AD 15)

1

| SV | |
| --- | --- |

SV

---

V Yttranden

ADMINISTRATIVA FÖRFARANDEN

Europeiska kemikaliemyndigheten

| 9.2.2007 | SV | Europeiska unionens officiella tidning | CA 29/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2007

SV

Europeiska unionens officiella tidning

CA 29/1

---

Utlysning av en tjänst som verkställande direktör vid Europeiska kemikaliemyndigheten i Helsingfors (lönegrad AD 15)

(2007/C 29 A/01)

Reach-förordningen, som kommer att träda i kraft den 1 juni 2007, kommer att ge ett nytt regelverk för kemiska substanser i Europeiska unionen. Europeiska kemikaliemyndigheten, med säte i Helsingfors, kommer stå i centrum för Reach. Europeiska kemikaliemyndigheten kommer att ansvara för de tekniska, vetenskapliga och administrativa aspekterna av Reach, och för att se till att förordningen tillämpas konsekvent. Den kommer att ge medlemsstaterna och EU-institutionerna bästa möjliga vetenskapliga och tekniska råd i kemiska frågor.

Till tjänsten som verkställande direktör söker kommissionen en person som har förmåga att leda en stor tillsynsbyrå inom EU i början av dess verksamhet och leda den genom de vetenskapliga, tekniska och organisatoriska utmaningar det innebär att inrätta komplicerade tillsynsprocedurer inom ett område som är politiskt känsligt och ytterst viktigt för miljö, ekonomisk konkurrenskraft, innovation och människors hälsa. De sökande skall ha en gedigen erfarenhet av förvaltning och ledarskap inom relevanta vetenskapliga och tekniska områden.

Verkställande direktören kommer att utses av kemikaliemyndighetens styrelse bland de personer som kommissionen har valt ut och fört upp på en särskild förteckning. Han eller hon kommer att utses som tillfälligt anställd i lönegrad AD 15 i enlighet med artikel 2a i anställningsvillkoren för övriga anställda i Europeiska gemenskaperna för en period på fem år som kan förlängas en gång med ytterligare en period på högst fem år.

Utlysningen av tjänsten och ansökningsblankett finns på följande webbplatser:

http://www.ec.europa.eu/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm

och

http://www.ec.europa.eu/enterprise/reach/prep_jobs_en.htm

Sista ansökningsdag är den 23 mars 2007.

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.6073-1 Time for filing declarations of estimated income tax by individuals.

For provisions relating to time for filing declarations of estimated income tax by individuals, see §§ 1.6073-1 to 1.6073-4, inclusive, of this chapter (Income Tax Regulations).
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT DAVID E. PRIMM, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-4925 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed September 18, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk County; William Sites, Judge. David E. Primm, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
CASANUEVA, MORRIS, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
Regional Administrator 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region VII 

11201 Renner Blvd 

Lenexa, KS 66219 

Dear Regional Administrator Brooks: 

The Iowa Department of Natural Resources (DNR) requests that the U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency approve the attached State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision designed to prevent future 

violations of the 2008 lead (Pb) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) in Council Bluffs, Iowa. 

The DNR developed the SIP revision in response to the lead nonattainment designation for a portion of 

Pottawattamie County, published in the Federal Register November 22, 2011 (76 FR 72097). 

The SIP revision includes a modeling demonstration showing the reductions needed to attain and 

maintain the lead NAAQS, control measures meeting RACT and RACM requirements, enforceable 

commitments to implement contingency measures if triggered, and other required nonattainment plan 

provisions. The control measures are enforceable and contain procedures for monitoring compliance. 

Appendix B incorporates the Administrative Consent Order (2015-AQ-02) with Griffin Pipe Products Co., 

LLC, and Appendix C contains the construction permit (14-A-521) issued to Alter Metal Recycling; both 

included for adoption into the SIP. The submission conforms with the requirements of 40 Code of 

Federal Regulations Part 51, Appendix V. 

I look forward to the U.S. EPA's approval and promulgation of a SIP revision for the State of Iowa in this 

matter. If you have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact Matthew Johnson at 

matthew.johnson@dnr.iowa.gov or (515) 725-9554. 

Sincerely, 

Chuck Gipp 

Director 

Iowa Department of Natural Resources 

Enclosures 

7900 Hickman Road, Suite 1 I Windsor Heights, Iowa 50324 

515-725-9500 FAX 515-725-9501 www.lowaCieanAir.gov
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 18 (Thursday, January 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 5180]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1896]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[L10200000-MJ0000-LLORL00100; HAG 09-0062]


Southeast Oregon Resource Advisory Council: Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Southeast Oregon Resource Advisory Council: Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the Department of 
the Interior Bureau of Land Management (BLM) announces the following 
advisory committee meeting:
    Name: Southeast Oregon Resource Advisory Council (SEORAC).
    Time and Date: 1 p.m. February 26, 2009; 8 a.m. February 27, 2009.
    Place: Best Western Rory and Ryan Inns, 534 Highway 20 N, Hines, 
Oregon 97738.
    Status: Open to the public.
SUMMARY: The SEORAC will be briefed on BLM's wild horse and burro 
program, BLM's sagebrush habitat treatments and the current status of 
the Oregon Explorer grant. Council members will also provide 
orientation to new members, conduct chair elections, establish their 
2009 annual work plan and meeting schedule, receive organizational 
updates from designated federal officials, give interest area updates, 
implement a subgroup establishment process, identify new subgroup 
members, present active subgroup reports and develop agenda items for 
the next meeting. Any other matters that may reasonably come before the 
SEORAC may also be addressed.
    The public is welcome to attend all portions of the meeting and may 
contribute during the public comment period at 11 a.m. on February 27, 
2009. Those who verbally address the SEORAC during the public comment 
period are asked to provide a written statement of their comments or 
presentation. Unless otherwise approved by the SEORAC chair, the public 
comment period will last no longer than 30 minutes, and each speaker 
may address the SEORAC for a maximum of five minutes.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Program information, meeting records 
and a roster of council members may be obtained from Scott Stoffel, 
Public Affairs Specialist, 1301 South G Street, Lakeview, OR 97630, 
(541) 947-6237. The meeting agenda will be posted at http://www.blm.gov/or/rac/seorrac-minutes.php when available.
    Should you require reasonable accommodation, please contact the 
Lakeview District BLM at (541) 947-2177 as soon as possible.

    Dated: January 20, 2009.
Carol A. Benkosky,
District Manager.
[FR Doc. E9-1896 Filed 1-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-P