alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Date Meeting

Agencies/Organizations

Represented

December 15-16, 2008

FL Estuary Nutrient Criteria Meeting:

Collaboration Steering Committee Meeting

(Penscola, FL) EPA,FDEP

March 11, 2009

March 18, 2009

March 25, 2009

April 1, 2009

April 15, 2009

April 29, 2009

October 14, 2009

October 28, 2009

November 11, 2009

December 2, 2009

December 16, 2009

May 6, 2009 Face-to-Face Meeting (Atlanta, GA) EPA, FDEP

June 10, 2009

The Use of USGS SPARROW model for

Downstream Protection (Teleconference) EPA, USGS, FDEP

June 29 - 30, 2009

The Use of USGS SPARROW model for

Downstream Protection (Tallahassee, FL) EPA, USGS, FDEP

August 28, 2009

FL Estuarine/Coastal Nutrient Criteria (South

Florida)

EPA, USGS, NOAA, FDEP,

SFWMD, FIU

January 6, 2010

January 20, 2010

February 3, 2010

March 3, 2010

April 14, 2010

April 28, 2010

May 12, 2010

May 26, 2010

June 23, 2010

July 7, 2010

July 21, 2010

August 4, 2010

March 17, 2010 Face-to-Face Meeting (Pensacola, FL) EPA, FDEP

December 1, 2010

Overview of NEP Approaches for Nutrient

Management in SW Florida Estuaries

EPA, Tampa NEP, Sarasota NEP,

Charlotte Harbor NEP, Janicki

Environmental

December 8, 2010

Approaches for Numeric Nutrient Criteria

Development in Florida Estuaries, Coastal waters,

and Southern inland Flowing waters EPA, FDEp, SFWMD

2008

2009

Florida Estuary and Coastal Waters Numeric

Nutrient Criteria (Reoccuring Teleconference) EPA, FDEP

2010

Florida Estuary and Coastal Waters Numeric

Nutrient Criteria (Reoccuring Teleconference) EPA, FDEP

Additional Meetings

Additional Meetings
January 5, 2011

January 19, 2011

February 2, 2011

February 17, 2011

March 2, 2011

March 30, 2011

April 6, 2011

April 20, 2011

May 4, 2011

May 18, 2011

June 1, 2011

June 15, 2011

June 29, 2011

July 13, 2011

July 27, 2011

August 24, 2011

Additional Meetings

April 8, 2011

Tampa Bay Estuary Program and EPA

Development of Estarine Nutrient Criteria for

Tampa Bay (Tampa, FL)

EPA, FDEP, Tampa NEP,

Sarasota NEP, Tetra Tech,

Janicki Environmental

May 24, 2011

Numeric Nutrient Criteria Development in South

Florida Marine Waters (Webinar) EPA, NPS, FIU, SERC,Tetra Tech

June 7-8, 2011

Estuarine Criteria Development in the St. Johns

Watershed and Indian River Lagoon (Platka, FL)

EPA, FDEP, SJWMD, SFWMD,

Indian River Lagoon NEP,

Broward County, Tetra Tech,

Janicki Environmental

July 12-13, 2011

Criteria Development in South Florida Estuarine

and Coastal Marine Waters (Palm Beach, FL)

EPA, NPS, FDEP, SFWMD,

Charlotte Harbor NEP, FIU,

SERC, Miami-Dade DERM, PB

CORM, Broward County,

Loxahatchee Riverkeeper, Tetra

Tech

July 28, 2011

Additional data collection for Loxahatchee Estuary

(Teleconference) EPA, Loxahatchee River Keeper

August 31, 2011

Numeric Nutrient Criteria Development in Tampa

Bay, Sarasota Bay, and Charlotte Harbor

(Washington, DC)

EPA, Tampa NEP, Sarasota NEP,

Charlotte Harbor NEP, Janicki

Environmental, Tetra Tech

Florida Estuary Modeling Subgroup (Reoccuring

Teleconference) EPA, FDEP

2011

Florida Estuary and Coastal Waters Numeric

Nutrient Criteria (Reoccuring Teleconference) EPA, FDEP
#### DUQUESNE CLUB v. THE UNITED STATES

[Nos. 43180 and 43263]

[87 C. Cls. 483; 306 U. S. 649]

Petitions dismissed July 5, 1938.

Petitions for writ of certiorari *denied*by the Supreme Court March 13, 1939.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 153 (Tuesday, August 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 40286]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18968]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Thrift Supervision


Peoples Community Bank, West Chester, OH; Notice of Appointment 
of Receiver

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the authority contained in 
section 5(d)(2) of the Home Owners' Loan Act, the Office of Thrift 
Supervision (OTS) has duly appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation as sole Receiver for Peoples Community Bank, West Chester, 
Ohio (OTS No. 08097), on July 31, 2009.

    Dated: August 4, 2009.

By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Sandra E. Evans,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. E9-18968 Filed 8-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
Amendment To Cinergy Corp. Excess Profit Sharing Plan



 Exhibit 10.66 
  
 AMENDMENT TO 
 CINERGY CORP. EXCESS PROFIT SHARING PLAN

  
 The Cinergy Corp. Excess Profit Sharing Plan (the “Plan”)
is amended, effective as of December 19, 2006, as follows: 

	 	1.	Section 4.2 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following new paragraph (d) at the end thereof: 


	 	“(d)	Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, each phantom unit of Duke Energy Corporation common stock (held in the account formerly known as the Cinergy Corp. Common Stock
Fund, which has been renamed the Duke Energy Common Stock Fund) credited to a Participant’s Account on the Distribution Date shall be converted, as of the Distribution Date, into phantom units of Spectra Energy Corp common stock and phantom
units of Duke Energy Corporation common stock and reallocated as follows: 


	 	(1)	The number of phantom units of Spectra Energy Corp common stock shall be equal to the number of shares of Spectra Energy Corp common stock to which the Participant would have been entitled on
the Distribution had the phantom units of Duke Energy Corporation common stock represented actual shares of Duke Energy Corporation common stock as of the Record Date, the resulting number of phantom units of Spectra Energy Corp common stock being
rounded down to the nearest whole unit. 


	 	(2)	The resulting number of phantom units of Spectra Energy Corp common stock shall automatically be transferred from the Duke Energy Corporation Common Stock Fund and credited to a separate
Investment Option that corresponds to the performance of Spectra Energy Corp common stock (the “Spectra Investment Option”), effective as of the Distribution Date. 


	 	(3)	A Participant may elect, pursuant to rules and procedures prescribed by the Committee, to reallocate amounts deemed invested in the Spectra Investment Option into any other open Investment
Option. The Spectra Investment Option shall be closed to additional deferrals and to transfers from any other Investment Option. 


	 	(4)	Capitalized terms used in this Section 4.2(d) that are not defined in this Plan shall have the meaning set forth in the Employee Matters Agreement by and between Duke Energy Corporation
and Spectra Energy Corp.” 


	 	2.	Except as explicitly set forth herein, the Plan will remain in full force and effect. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Cinergy Corp. has caused this Amendment to be executed and approved effective as of the date set forth herein. 
  

			
	 By:
	 	 /S/    CHRISTOPHER C.
ROLFE        

		 	Christopher C. Rolfe
		 	Group Executive and Chief
		 	Administrative Officer


  
 Date:
12/19/06
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.6062-1 Signing of corporation returns.

For provisions relating to the signing of corporation income tax returns, see § 1.6062-1 of this chapter (Income Tax Regulations).
IV

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 22

Affirming the purpose and value of senior nutrition programs created under

the Older Americans Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 3, 1995

Mr. KENNEDY of Rhode Island (for himself and Mr. SCHUMER) submitted the

following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on

Economic and Educational Opportunities

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Affirming the purpose and value of senior nutrition programs

created under the Older Americans Act.

Whereas senior nutrition programs are low cost, locally managed, and enjoy widespread community and volunteer

support;

Whereas an essential the key to the success of senior nutrition programs is their openness. A means-test, if established, would discourage participation;

Whereas the nutritional needs of more than 2.5 million senior

citizens are met by congregate meal programs which

serve more than 1.3 million meals a year in churches,

senior centers, and community locations;

Whereas more than 820,000 shut-in senior citizens receive

meals delivered to their homes each year;
2

•HCON 22 IH

Whereas lunch can be delivered to a senior citizen at home

for a full year for less than the cost of one day in a hospital;

Whereas senior nutrition programs are a method of preventive care for senior citizens;

Whereas senior nutrition programs are a key link in the network of senior support programs, often providing the opportunity to coordinate the services senior citizens need

to lead independent and rewarding lives;

Whereas senior nutrition programs connect senior citizens to

social activities which significantly add to their quality of

life; and

Whereas without senior nutrition programs, senior citizens

would face a greater risk of nutritional deficiency, poor

health, and isolation: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 nutritional programs created under the Older Americans

4 Act provide essential assistance to senior citizens, that

5 their effectiveness would be severely compromised by re6 moving the programs from the Act, and that their viability

7 would be threatened by reducing the total funds available

8 and combining senior nutrition with means-tested public

9 assistance programs.

Æ
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 94

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 10, 1995

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a

dedication ceremony incident to the placement of a bust

of Raoul Wallenberg in the Capitol.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),

3 SECTION 1. DEDICATION CEREMONY AND PLACEMENT OF

4 A BUST OF RAOUL WALLENBERG IN THE CAP5 ITOL.

6 The rotunda of the Capitol may be used on November

7 2, 1995, for a ceremony incident to the placement of a

8 bust of Raoul Wallenberg in the Capitol as previously au9 thorized by Congress.
2

HCON 94 RDS

1 SEC. 2. SECURITY AND PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS.

2 The Capitol Police Board shall take such action with

3 respect to security as may be necessary to carry out sec4 tion 1. The Architect of the Capitol shall make appropriate

5 physical preparations for the ceremony referred to in sec6 tion 1.

Passed the House of Representatives September 29,

1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
exv10w53



 





Exhibit 10.53




CERTAIN BENEFITS AND FEES FOR OUR



NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS




     This chart summarizes benefits we make available to our named executive officers and directors
for which we do not otherwise have written plan documents on file.



	 	 	 	 	 
	Description of Benefit	 	Eligible Positions	 	Amount/Schedule
	Club Memberships

	 	Chief Executive
Officer and
President-Customer
Management
	 	Club Membership, not including dues
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Long-Distance Telephone Service (1)

	 	Legacy Sprint
Executive Officers,
including those that are
Named Executive Officers
	 	Actual usage (continues after

retirement)
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Personal use of corporate aircraft

	 	Chief Executive Officer
	 	Under an executive security
program established by the Human
Capital and Compensation Committee, the
Chief Executive Officer is required to
use Sprint Nextel aircraft for personal
as well as business travel. Sprint
Nextel provides these security services
for its benefit rather than as a
personal benefit or perquisite for the
Chief Executive Officer
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Other Executive
Officers, including the
other Named Executive
Officers and non-employee
members of the Board of
Directors
	 	The Chief Executive Officer must
pre-approve any proposed personal use
of the corporate aircraft for personal
reasons.
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Executive Physical

	 	Executive Officers,
including the Named
Executive Officers
	 	Reimbursement for annual physical

examination
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Board of Director Fees

	 	Non-employee members
of the Board of Directors
	 	Annual retainer -$70,000/year
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Additional Annual retainer for

Lead Independent Director -

$75,000/year
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Committee Chair additional annual

retainer:
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	     Audit Committee — $20,000

	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	     Human Capital and Compensation
Committee — $15,000

	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	     Finance and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees — $10,000

	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Board and Committee In-Person
Meeting Fees — $2,000/ meeting
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Telephonic Board and Committee
Meeting Fees-$1,000/meeting
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Annual award of $100,000 in
restricted stock units








 




			
	(1)	 	Sprint Nextel reimburses for income taxes associated with these benefits.






1
| (logo)  WELLS FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

** **

** **

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Referenceis hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement as of October 1,2015, by and among GS MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORPORATION II, as Depositor, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, ADIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, PENTALPHASURVEILLANCE LLC, as Operating Advisor, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asCertificate Administrator and Trustee, with respect to Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates Series 2015-GC34 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuantto Section 10.07 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice Presidentof Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.            A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period fromJanuary 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.           To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

  

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February2018.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive VicePresident 

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells  Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|------------------------------------|
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 150 (Thursday, August 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 39302]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18745]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XQ79


New England Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY:  National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of a public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The New England Fishery Management Council's (NEFMC) 
Scientific and Statistical Committee (SSC) will host an Ecosystem Based 
Fisheries Management (EBFM) Workshop for Council members and staff, 
Plan Development Team members, interested parties and members of the 
public. The intent of this meeting is to develop a ``blueprint'' that 
would inform the Council's efforts to develop an EBFM approach or plan 
for NEFMC-managed species.

DATES: This meeting will be held on August 26 and August 27, 2009. See 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for specific dates and times.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Marriott Hotel, 25 America's 
Cup Avenue, Newport, RI 02840; telephone: (401) 849-1000; fax: (401) 
849-3422.
    Council address: New England Fishery Management Council, 50 Water 
Street, Mill 2, Newburyport, MA 01950.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul J. Howard, Executive Director, 
New England Fishery Management Council; telephone: (978) 465-0492.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will begin at 9 a.m. on 
Wednesday, August 26, 2009 and recess at 5 p.m., or when business is 
complete; reconvene at 9 a.m. on Thursday, August 27, 2009 and recess 
at 3 p.m., or when business is complete.

Special Accommodations

    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Paul J. Howard, Executive Director, at 978-465-
0492, at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.

    Authority:  16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: July 31, 2009.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E9-18745 Filed 8-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Agricultural Research Service

# AGENCY:

Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of intent.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to OSPREY BIOTECHNICS, INC. of SARASOTA, FLORIDA an exclusive license to U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 11/901,547, “COMPOSITION OF ENTOMOPATHOGENIC FUNGUS AND METHOD OF PRODUCTION AND APPLICATION FOR INSECT CONTROL”, filed on September 13, 2007.

# DATES:

Comments must be received by September 8, 2009.

# ADDRESSES:

Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Rm. 4-1174, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-5131.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

June Blalock of the Office of Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 301-504-5989.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Government's patent rights in this invention are assigned to the United States of America, as represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public interest to so license this invention as OSPREY BIOTECHNICS, INC. of SARASOTA, FLORIDA has submitted a complete and sufficient application for a license. The prospective exclusive license will be royalty-bearing and will comply with the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The prospective exclusive license may be granted unless, within thirty (30) days from the date of this published Notice, the Agricultural Research Service receives written evidence and argument which establishes that the grant of the license would not be consistent with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.

Richard J. Brenner,

Assistant Administrator.

[FR Doc. E9-18850 Filed 8-5-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-03-P
# Montana Claims Service ofMt1es City, 

# Inc. P.O. Box369 • Miles City, MT 59301 (406)232-0306 •F AX: (406)232-0307 • EMAIL: mcsmc@midrivers.com Multi-lineAdjusters for tlteState of Montana andNorthern Wyoming April 11, 2013

Docket Operations M-30 West Building Ground Floor W 12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590;3 United States ofAmerica Department ofTransportation Office ofSecretary Washington DC RE: DocketDOS-OST-1997-2605

As a small business owner and member ofthe Miles City Airport Commission, I would strongly support the continuation ofEssential Air Service for Miles City, Montana. This service is essential for our area as it provides the necessary connectionto other airlines and services required by citizens from all ofsoutheastern Montana. The EAS provides safe travel for people who ate unable to drive; especially inhazardous winter conditions which often occur in our area. EAS also provides transportation to Billings, Montana for our elderly, disabled veterans, and others seeking medical treatment from specialists, as Billings is the medical hub for all ofeastern Montana. With the newly discovered oil in the Bakken formation ofwesternNorth Dakotaand eastern Montana along with the proposed Otter Creek coal development south ofMiles City, we are becoming even more dependent on EAS to supportMiles City in ourrole as the business hub ofeastern Montana. Itis absolutely essential we have reliable business airtransportation available for ourcommunity. Furthermore, Miles City is a link between the other Montana cities receiving EAS. The loss ofany one community in this link affects air service to all ofthe othercities in Montana. Essential Air Service also provides a number of jobs in our area. People within the system from passengers, airline pilots and staff, TSA employees and others support local motels and restaurants as well as numerous other businesses. With the recent change in the law, the area ofeastern Montana served by EAS at Miles City has not had time to address the impending loss ofair service. I urge you to not enforce the Show Cause Order contained in Docket DOS-OST-1997-2605 and allow the Montana Essential Air Task Force and the people ofeastern Montanatime '\ www.montanaclaimsservice.com Office locations: Billings, Bozeman, GreatFalls, Helena, Kalispell, Miles City andMissoulato develop a workable solution to increase usage ofthe airline service across our area. Continuation ofthe EAS at Miles City should be allowed for at leastthe nexttwo year period to give us time to complete our plan to increase usage ofthe Miles City facility. Thank you for your cooperation in helping us maintain our EAS connection with other Montana cities. Sincerely, Lee Richardson