39–010 

Calendar No. 342 

113TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! SENATE 2d Session 113–144 

A BILL TO AMEND THE CLEAN AIR ACT TO REMOVE THE 

REQUIREMENT FOR DEALER CERTIFICATION OF NEW 

LIGHT-DUTY MOTOR VEHICLES 

APRIL 1, 2014.—Ordered to be printed 

Mrs. BOXER, from the Committee on Environment and Public 

Works, submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H.R. 724] 

[Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office] 

The Committee on Environment and Public Works, to which was 

referred the bill (H.R. 724) to amend the Clean Air Act to remove 

the requirement for dealer certification of new light-duty motor vehicles, having considered the same, reports favorably thereon without amendment and recommends that the bill do pass. 

GENERAL STATEMENT AND BACKGROUND

H.R. 724 would repeal a requirement under the Clean Air Act 

that automobile dealers provide purchasers of new light-duty motor 

vehicles with a certificate that indicates the vehicle conforms to 

federal emissions standards. 

H.R. 724 strikes section 207(h)(1) of the Clean Air Act (42 

U.S.C.7541(h)), which requires auto dealers, upon sale of each new 

light duty motor vehicle, to furnish to the purchaser a certificate 

that such motor vehicle conforms to the emissions standards issued 

pursuant to section 202 (42 U.S.C. 7521) and notice of the purchaser’s right to have the manufacturer remedy any non-conformity 

to section 202 emissions standards at the cost of the manufacturer 

during the warranty period. 

The certification requirement was added to the Clean Air Act in 

the 1977 Amendments. At that time, catalytic converters for pollution control were often installed at the dealership, and the certification requirement was intended to hold the dealers responsible for 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
2 

making sure that the pollution controls were installed and working. 

Now, pollution controls are built into the vehicles by the manufacturers, who are fully responsible for the functioning of the pollution 

control equipment. 

In addition, the warranty information on the certificate is now 

outdated, and current warranty information is available to consumers elsewhere. Further, the Environmental Protection Agency 

no longer enforces this requirement. No other provisions of the 

Clean Air Act are changed by H.R. 724. 

OBJECTIVES OF THE LEGISLATION

The goal of the legislation is to remove an unnecessary and outdated paperwork requirement applicable to new motor vehicle purchases. 

SECTION-BY-SECTION ANALYSIS

Section 1 

Section 1 strikes paragraph 1 of section 207(h) of the Clean Air 

Act (42 U.S.C. 7541(h)), which provides that ‘‘[u]pon the sale of 

each new light-duty motor vehicle by a dealer, the dealer shall furnish to the purchaser a certificate that such motor vehicle conforms 

to the applicable regulations under section 7521 of this title, including notice of the purchaser’s rights under [this subsection].’’ 

The section also includes a technical correction, re-designating 

current paragraphs (2) and (3) as paragraphs (1) and (2), respectively. 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY

On February 14, 2013, H.R. 724 was introduced by Rep. Latta 

(R–OH) and Rep. Peters (D–MI) and referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. On December 10 and 11, 2013, 

the House Committee on Energy and Commerce met in open markup session and ordered H.R. 724 reported to the House, without 

amendment, by voice vote (H. Rept. 113–320). On January 8, 2014, 

the House suspended the rules and passed H.R. 724 by a vote of 

405–0. On January 9, 2013 the bill was received in the Senate and 

referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works. On 

February 6, 2014, the Committee on Environment and Public 

Works met to consider H.R. 724. The bill was ordered to be reported without amendment favorably. 

HEARINGS

No committee hearings were held on H.R 724. 

ROLLCALL VOTES

The Committee on Environment and Public Works met to consider H.R. 724 on February 6, 2014. The bill was ordered favorably 

reported by voice vote. No roll call votes were taken. 

REGULATORY IMPACT STATEMENT

In compliance with section 11(b) of rule XXVI of the Standing 

Rules of the Senate, the committee finds that H.R. 724 does not 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
3 

create any additional regulatory burdens, nor will it cause any adverse impact on the personal privacy of individuals. 

MANDATES ASSESSMENT

In compliance with the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 

(Public Law 104–4), the committee notes that the Congressional 

Budget Office found, ‘‘H.R. 724 contains no intergovernmental or 

private-sector mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act and would impose no costs on state, local, or tribal governments.’’ 

FEBRUARY 12, 2014. 

Hon. BARBARA BOXER, 

Chairman, Committee on Environment and Public Works, 

U.S. Senate, Washington, DC. 

DEAR MADAM CHAIRMAN: The Congressional Budget Office has 

prepared the enclosed cost estimate for H.R. 724, an act to amend 

the Clean Air Act to remove the requirement for dealer certification 

of new light-duty motor vehicles. 

If you wish further details on this estimate, we will be pleased 

to provide them. The CBO staff contact is Susanne S. Mehlman. 

Sincerely, 

DOUGLAS W. ELMENDORF. 

Enclosure. 

H.R. 724—An act to amend the Clean Air Act to remove the requirement for dealer certification of new light-duty motor vehicles 

H.R. 724 would repeal a requirement under the Clean Air Act 

(CAA) that automobile dealers provide purchasers of new light-duty 

motor vehicles with a certificate that indicates the vehicle conforms 

to federal emissions standards. The certificate also indicates the 

purchaser’s right to have the manufacturer fix the vehicle if it does 

not comply with emission standards. 

According to the Environmental Protection Agency, other provisions of the CAA ensure that all new vehicles offered for sale comply with the act. Thus, CBO estimates that repealing this requirement would have no impact on the federal budget. Enacting H.R. 

724 would not affect direct spending or revenues; therefore, pay-asyou-go procedures do not apply. 

H.R. 724 contains no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act and would 

impose no costs on state, local, or tribal governments. 

On December 19, 2013, CBO transmitted a cost estimate for H.R. 

724, as ordered reported by the House Committee on Energy and 

Commerce on December 11, 2013. The two versions of the legislation are identical, and the CBO cost estimates are the same. 

The CBO staff contact for this estimate is Susanne S. Mehlman. 

The estimate was approved by Theresa Gullo, Deputy Assistant Director for Budget Analysis. 

CHANGES IN EXISTING LAW

In compliance with section 12 of rule XXVI of the Standing Rules 

of the Senate, changes in existing law made by the bill as reported 

are shown as follows: Existing law proposed to be omitted is enVerDate Mar 15 2010 05:01 Apr 04, 2014 Jkt 039010 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\SR144.XXX SR144

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
4 

closed in øblack brackets¿, new matter is printed in italic, existing 

law in which no change is proposed is shown in roman: 

CLEAN AIR ACT 

* * * * * * * 

SEC. 101. (a) The Congress finds— 

(1)* * * 

* * * * * * * 

SEC. 207. (a)* * * 

* * * * * * * 

(h)ø(1) Upon the sale of each new light-duty motor vehicle by a 

dealer, the dealer shall furnish to the purchaser a certificate that 

such motor vehicle conforms to the applicable regulations under 

section 202, including notice of the purchaser’s rights under paragraph (2).¿ 

ø(2)¿ (1) If at any time during the period for which the warranty 

applies under subsection (b), a motor vehicle fails to conform to the 

applicable regulations under section 202 as determined under subsection (b) of this section such nonconformity shall be remedied by 

the manufacturer at the cost of the manufacturer pursuant to such 

warranty as provided in section 207(b)(2) (without regard to subparagraph (C) thereof). 

ø(3)¿ (2) Nothing in section 209(a) shall be construed to prohibit 

a State from testing, or requiring testing of, a motor vehicle after 

the date of sale of such vehicle to the ultimate purchaser (except 

that no new motor vehicle manufacturer or dealer may be required 

to conduct testing under this paragraph). 

* * * * * * * 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS