## Maine Department of Environmental Protection ReasonablyAvailable Control Technology (RACT) State Implementation Plan (SIP) Revision Under the 1997 8-Hour Ozone NationalAmbient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS)
August 20, 2009

### 1. Introduction

Background and Requirements The federal Clean AirAct (CAA) gives the states primary responsibility for achieving the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)
. The NAAQS areestablished by the U .S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as the maximum concentrations in the atmosphere for specific air contaminants to protect public health and welfare. Theprincipal mechanismat the state level for complyingwith the CAAis the State Implementation Plan (SIP)
. ASIPincludes the regulatory programs, actions, and commitments a state will carry out to implement its responsibilities under the CAA
. Once approved by the EPA, a SIP is legally enforceable under both federal and state law . This document is a SIP revision for meeting the Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) requirements mandated under the CAAand regulations related to the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. The CAArequires that states achieve the NAAQSby specified dates, based on the severity ofan area's air qualityproblem

. Maintainingconcentrations ofground level ozone below the health-based standard is important becauseozone is aserious humanhealth threat, and canalso causedamage to important food crops, forests andwildlife. Repeated exposure to ozonepollution maycauseavariety ofadverse health effects forboth healthypeople andthosewith existing conditions including difficulty breathing, chest pains, coughing, nausea, throat irritation and congestion. It canexacerbate bronchitis, heart disease, emphysema, and asthma, and reduce lung capacity. Ozone is generally not directly emitted to the atmosphere; rather it is formed in the atmosphere by photochemical reactions betweenvolatile organic compounds (VOC) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) in the presence ofsunlight. Consequently, in orderto reduce ozone concentrations in the ambient air, the CAArequires all nonattainment areas to apply controls on VOC/NOx emission sources to achieve emission reductions. Amongtheeffective control measures, the Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) controls play a major role in reducing emissions fromstationary sources. The EPAhas defined RACT as the lowest emission limitation that a particular source is capable of meeting by the application ofcontrol technology that is reasonably available considering technological and economic feasibility (44FR53761, September 17, 1979)
. Section 182ofthe CAAestablishes two separate RACT requirements for ozone nonattainment areas. Thefirst requirement, contained in section 182(a)(A) ofthe CAA, and referred to as RACT fix-up, requires the correction of RACT rules forwhich EPAidentified deficiencies before the CAAwas amended in 1990 . Maine has no deficiencies to correct under this section ofthe CAA . Thesecond requirement, setforth in Section 182(b)(2) ofthe CAA, applies to moderate or worseozone nonattainment areas as well as to marginal and attainment areas in OzoneTransport Regions (OTRs) established pursuant to Section 184ofthe CAA, and requires these nonattainment areas to implement RACT controls on all major VOCand NOx emission sources and on all sources and source categories covered by a Control Technique Guideline' document issued by EPA. Undersection 183 ofthe CAA, EPAwas required to issue by certain timeframes several guidance documents for RACT controls that would help states meet the requirements ofsection 182(b)(2)
. This requirement upon EPAincludes developing (1) Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG) documents for 1 AControl Technique Guideline (CTG) is an EPAguidance document intended to provide informationto assist state and local airpollution authorities in determining RACT for VOCsources. ACTGis not a regulation, but instead a recommendation based on cost-effective control strategies that are currently in use . 

### 2

### control ofVOCemissions fromstationary sources, and (2)Alternate ControlTechniques (ACT)

documents for control ofVOCand NOxemissions fromstationary sources. EPAissued three groups ofControl Techniques Guideline documentsestablishing a "presumptive norm" for RACT forvarious categories ofVOCsources: 1) Group I, issued beforeJanuary 1978 including 15 CTGs; 2) Group II, issued in 1978 including 9 CTGs; and 3) Group III, issued in theearly 1980s with 5 CTGs
. Sources not covered by the issued CTGs are referred to as non-CTGsources. Section 182(b)(2) ofthe CAArequires states with ozone nonattainment areas classified as moderate or worseto develop RACT controls for all pre-enactment (i .e., pre-1990) CTGsource categories, for all sources subject to postenactment (i .e., post-1990) CTGs, andfor all non-CTGmajor sources in their nonattainment areas. The EPAhas also issued more than 12ACTs forvarious categories ofVOCs and NOx sources. Maine's OzoneAir Quality Status Nine Maine counties were designated as nonattainment ofthe 1-hour ozone NAAQS under the 1990 CAA : York, Cumberland and Sagadahoc counties (Planning Area 1) ; Androscoggin and Kennebec counties (Planning Area 2) ; and Knox and Lincoln counties (Planning Area 3) were designated as "moderate" nonattainment, while Hancock and Waldo counties (Planning Area 4) were designated as "marginal" nonattainment for ozone.2 Maine had two nonattainment areas under the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. The Portland Nonattainment area consists ofthe 57 cities and towns comprising York, Cumberland and Sagadahoc Counties along with Durham, Maine in Androscoggin County, and was' been designated as "marginal" nonattainment for the 8-hour ozone standard, while the MidCoast Nonattainment Area consists of 55 coastal towns and islands in Hancock, Knox, Lincoln and Waldo counties, andwas designated as a "Basic/General" nonattainment area for the 8-hour ozone standard
. Based on ambient air quality monitoring data for the period from2003-2005, both the Portland and MidCoast 8-hour ozone nonattainment areas were attaining the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS3, andwere redesignated to attainment on 12/11/06 (70 FR 71489)
. The 1-hour and 1997 8-hour ozone nonattainment and maintenance areas are illustrated in Figure 1. For the purpose ofregulating stationary sources, the entire State of Maine is considered a "moderate" nonattainment area for the 8-hour ozone NAAQSbecause it is in the Ozone Transport Region established under operation oflaw under Section 184ofthe CAA . Sections 172(c)(1) and 182(b)(2) and (f) ofthe CAArequire owners andoperators ofsources in ozone nonattainment areas to implement RACT for sources that aresubject to Control Technique Guidelines (CTG) issued by EPAand for "major" sources ofVOCand NOx4,which are ozone precursors. RACT requirements arespecified in 2 Hancock and Waldocounties were redesignated to attainment for the 1-hour ozone standard in 1996. 3 These areas continue to meet the 1997 ozoneNAAQS. 4 On March 24, 2005, the Maine DEPsubmitted an exemption request fromthe NO, control requirements contained in section 182(f) ofthe CAAfor Northern Maine
. This exemption request demonstrated that NO,, emissions in Oxford, Franklin, Somerset, Piscataquis, Penobscot, Waldo, Hancock, Washington and Aroostook counties are not impacting Maine's (former) 8-hour nonattainment, or other 8-hour ozone nonattainment areas in the OzoneTransport Region (OTR) during times whenelevated ozone levels are monitored in these areas. Section 182(f) ofthe CAAalong with other sections 

### 3

### the CAAto assure that significant categories ofmajor source emissions are controlled to a "reasonable

extent, but not necessarily to the more stringent Best Available Control Technology (BACT) Maximum

Available Control Technology (MACT) or Lowest Achievable Emission Rate (LAER) levels.

~~ : ~ 

## zone~'Ihrtiand Bhr~Nonattainment~areas

. .

d0 80 Miles Createdby MertheWeb~ter,MEDEP-BAAreHSed 02f1595



## Figure 1 ® Legend 8hr nonattainment I IhrNonattainment G 1 hr Maintenance Area f
- I Attainment

According to the EPA's Final Rule to Implement the 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS (70 FR71612, November 29, 2005), areas classified as "moderate" nonattainment or higher must submit a demonstration, as a revision to the SIP, that their current rules fulfill 8-hour ozone RACT requirements for all CTG categories and all major, non-CTG sources5. Such a demonstration can be made with either a new RACT determination or a certification that previously-required RACT controls represent RACT for the 8-hour ozone NAAQS. The certification should be accompanied by appropriate supporting information, such as information received during the public comment period and consideration ofnew data, that may supplement existing RACT guidance documents that were developed for the 1-hour ofthe CAA requires states in the Ozone Transport Region to adopt reasonably available control technology rules formajor stationary sources ofNO ., and to provide for nonattainment area new source reviewfor new sourcesand modifications that meet orexceed the major source threshold forNO,, . The areas included in the section 182(f) "NO,, Waiver" are therefore not subjectto RACT, or new source reviewoffset and lowest achievable emission rate control requirements. The section 182(f) NOx Waiver was approved on February 3, 2006 (71 FR 5791)
. 5 The applicable EPAmajor source thresholds for RACT in Maine under the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQSare 50tons per year forVOCand 100tons per year for NOx. Table 3 indicates which Maine sourcesare majorunderthese thresholds. 

### 4

### standard, such that State SIPs accurately reflect RACT for the 8-hour ozonestandard based on the

current availability oftechnically and economically feasible controls. Adoption ofnewRACT regulation(s) shall occur when states have new stationary sources not covered by existing RACT regulations, or when new data or technical information indicates that a previously adopted RACT measure does not represent a newly-available RACT control level . Pursuant to EPA's Phase 2Rule, Mainewas required to submit a SIPaddressing 8-hour ozone RACT requirements within 29months of EPA's April 15, 2005 non-attainment areas designation. 2 . Certification ofVOCand NOx RACT Requirements The Department is certifying through this SIPthat its federally-approved SIP meets the RACT requirements for the 50tons peryear (tpy) non-CTGVOCsources andfor the 100tpy NOx sources, andthat all CTG-covered source categories in effect on April 15, 2005 are addressed at the emission thresholds set forth in the CTG . This certification is based on acombinationofthefollowing: 1) certification that previously-adopted RACT controls approved by EPAas revisions to Maine's SIP under the 1-hour ozone NAAQS are based on the currently available technically andeconomically feasible controls, and that theyrepresent RACT for 8-hour implementation purposes; and 2) the adoption ofmore recent regulations that represent RACT controls. Basedon theforegoing, the Department finds that all ofits existing andamended rules (see below) that applyto ozone precursor emissions fulfill RACT requirements for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS
. Moreover, the Department finds that all CTGsources and major non-CTGsources under itsjurisdiction are controlled to RACT or more stringent standards. Table 1 lists the VOCsource categories forwhich EPA issued CTGs prior toApril 15, 2005, and the existing negative declaration indicating that there are no sources in Maine, or the Maine RACT regulation for each ofthese categories. For all CTG categories, the Maine regulations either incorporated the CTGrecommended controls or achieved reductions equivalent to the CTGand were approved by EPA for 1-hour RACT purposes. 

### Negative Declarations The CTGcategories forwhich Maine previously submitted negative declarations stating that it did not have sources within a CTGcategory are also listed in Table 1 . Maine performedan inventory of existing and operating VOCsources andtheir applicable CTGcategories by reviewing its point source database for facilities with the North American Industrial Classification System(NAICS) codes that correspond to the CTGcategories forwhich Mainepreviously submitted negative declarations, reviewing its air emission licensedatabase, and conferring with field services staffto confirmthe presence (or lack of) asource category in Maine. The Department's analysis confirmedthat there are no emission sources in Maine subject to the following CTGrequirements: Control ofVolatile Organic Emissions fromExisting Stationary Sources, Volume 11: Surface Coating ofCoils, EPA-450/2-77- 008, May 1977 Control ofVolatile Organic Emissions fromExisting Stationary Sources, Volume IV: Surface Coating ofInsulation of Magnet Wire, EPA-450/2-77- 034, December 1977 Control ofVolatile Organic Emissions fromExisting Stationary Sources, Volume 11: Surface Coating ofAutomobiles and Light-duty Trucks, EPA-450/2-77- 008, May 1977

### Control ofVolatile Organic Emissions fromExisting Stationary Sources, Volume V : Surface Coating ofLarge Appliances, EPA-450/2-77- 034, December 1977 Control ofRefinery VacuumProducingSystems, Wastewater Separators, and Process Unit Turnarounds, EPA-450/2-77-025, October 1977 Control ofVolatile Organic Emissions fromManufacture ofSynthesized Pharmaceutical Products, EPA-450/2-78-029, December 1978 Control ofVolatile Organic Compounds Emissions fromLarge PetroleumDry Cleaners, EPA450-3-82-009, September 1982. Control ofVolatile OrganicCompounds Equipment Leaks fromSynthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing and Polymer Manufacturing Equipment, EPA-450/3-83-006, March 1984 Control ofVolatile Organic Compounds Equipment Leaks from Airoxidation Processes in Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry, EPA-450/3-84-015, March 1984 Control ofVolatile Organic Compound Emissions fromReactor Processes and Distillation Operations in SOCMI, EPA-450/4-91-031, November 1993 Control ofVolatile OrganicCompound Leaks fromPetroleumRefinery Equipment, EPA450/2-78-036,June 1978 Control ofVolatile Organic Compound Emissions From PetroleumLiquid Storage in External Floating RoofTanks, EPA-450/2-78-036, June 1978 Control ofVolatile Organic EmissionsfromManufacturingVegetableOils, EPA-450/2-78- 035, June 1978 Control ofVolatile Organic Emissions fromManufacture ofPneumatic Rubber Tires, EPA450/2-78-030, December 1978 Control ofVolatile Organic Compound Equipment leaks fromNatural Gas/Gasoline Processing Plants, EPA-450/2-83-007, December 1983 Certification The certification process beganwith the Department's staffreviewing thefederal andstate requirements, including CTGs,Available Control Technology (ACT) documents, federal Standards of Performance for New

Stationary Sources (NSPS), National Emission Standards for HazardousAir Pollutants (NESHAPS), and Maximum Available Control Technology (MACT) for the applicable source categories. Each regulation adopted by the Department has been evaluated against applicable CTGs andACTs, andfound to fulfill RACT forall applicable source categories with theexception of asphalt paving. Major sources ofVOCand NOxemissions not covered by a CTGaresubject to Maine's Chapter 134 Reasonably Available Control Technology for Facilities that Emit Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC RACT) rule and theChapter 138 Reasonably Available Technology For Facilities that Emit Nitrogen Oxides (NOx RACT) rule. These sources arealso subject to the Chapter 115 Major and Minor Source 6

### Air Emission License Regulations andChapter 140Part 70Air Emission License Regulations, which

specify the requirements for new or modified major and minor sources in Maine
. These regulations require that owners andoperators ofsuch new or modified sources comply with the Lowest Achievable Emission Rate (LAER) requirements for VOCand NOxb. Thesesources wouldalso be subject to the Best Available Control Technology (BACT) requirements mandated for the SIPapproved Prevention ofSignificant Deterioration (PSD) programifthey emit increased amounts of VOCor NOx abovecertain significance levels. MACT is an emission limitation based on the maximum

degree ofemission reduction (considering energy, environmental, and economic impacts) achievable through application ofproduction processes andavailable methods, systems and techniques. BACT does notallow emissions in excess ofthose allowed under any applicable federal CAAprovision. Areviewoftheemission levels for sources permitted under LAER/BACTafter the implementation of RACT forthe 1-hour NAAQS shows LAER control measures to be as stringent, or more restrictive than emission levels required by RACT. In addition to the BACT/LAER requirements for new or modified majorsources subject to NSR, the Department requires new sources that do not qualifyforreview

under major source NSRto instead implement best practical treatment (BPT) pursuant to 38 M

.R.S.A . § 601 . RACT Revisions In 2004, the Department amendedits Chapter 130Solvent Cleaners rule to require the useofvery low vapor pressure solvents7 in cold cleaning operations, and established several new work practice requirements. Theseamendments were based on a 2001 OzoneTransport Commission (OTC) Model rule, and were subsequently incorporated into the Maine SIPB. Maine has also determined that its previous asphalt paving regulations no longer constitute RACT under the 8-hour ozonestandard. Asphalt paving is used to pave, seal and repair surfaces such as roads, parking lots, andwalkways. Asphalt paving is grouped into three general categories: hot mix, cutbackand emulsified. Hot-mix asphalt, the most commonly used paving asphalt, produces minimal VOCemissions. Cutbackasphalt is prepared by blending asphalt cement with adiluent, typically from 25to 45 percent by volume ofpetroleumdistillates. Emulsified asphalt is a loweremitting alternative to cutbackasphalt; emulsified asphalts use a blend ofasphalt cement,water and an emulsifyingagent, such as soap. Some emulsified asphalts maycontainvirtually no VOCs; others maycontain up to 12% VOCby volume. The EPApublished a CTGfor the useofcutback asphalt in December 1977. The CTGrecommended replacing cutback asphalt binderswith emulsified asphalt during the ozone season. In 1979, EPA addeda specification for emulsified asphalt to the CTGrecommendations to limit the content ofoil distillate in emulsified asphalt to no greater than 7 percentoil distillate. Maine's regulation, 06-096 CMRChapter 131 Cutback Asphalt and Emulsified Asphalt, incorporated the CTGrequirements for this sector and met 1-hour RACT as noted in Table 1 . It prohibited the use ofcutback asphalt on public roads during the ozoneseason, but allowedfor a number ofexemptions. During its reviewofadditional control measures that states should consider adopting as part ofthe OTCregional 8-hour ozone attainment strategy, the OTCidentified asphalt paving as acategory where 6 Exceptingthe 182(f) NOx Waiverarea, which is subjectto BACT. 7 The amended Chapter 130 limits solvent vapor pressure to less than or equal to 1 .0 millimeters of mercury (mmHG) measured at 20'C (68IF), or containing less than or equal to 5% VOCbyweight. g (5/26/05, 70 FR 30367)

### further VOCemission reductions could be achieved. It developed a model rule for theasphaltpaving

control measures that prohibits the useofcutback asphalt during theozoneseason and limits the use of emulsified asphalt to that which contains not more than 0 .5 mL of oil distillate froma 200ml sample (as determined usingAmerican Societyfor Testing and Materials Methods)9 regardless ofthe application. After reviewing the OTCmodel rule, alongwith regulations in other northeastern states, Maine has amended its Chapter 131 Cutback and Emulsified Asphalt rule to limit theVOCcontent ofcutbackand emulsified asphalt, eliminate exempted uses ofcutback asphalt, and extend the scopeofthe regulation to all asphalt paving activities. Certification ofVOCRACT Requirements Table 1 lists each ofthe Department's VOC RACT regulations, the RACT basis for the regulation (CTG, ACT, etc.), the citation of EPA's approval ofthe SIP revision, the RACT rule applicability and requirements, and certification that the current rule represents RACT under the 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Where Maine has certified that a current SIP-approved regulation represents RACT under the 8-hour ozone NAAQS, the Department states that it is not aware ofany significant changes in control technology that affect the original RACT determination. The Department previously used a range of $3000-5000/ton ofVOCas a benchmark value when determining cost-effective control technology for VOCsources subject to the RACT requirements adopted for the 1-hour ozone standard. Due to increased energy costs, those previously determined cost-effective controls continue to represent RACT for the 8-hour ozone NAAQS because VOCcontrol technology has not substantially changed since the mid-1990s. 

### In addition to thefederally-required CTGandACT-based regulations, the Department is also including several regulations based on model rules developed by the Ozone Transport Commission in this certification. The Department believes that these rules, which are based on the 2001 Model Rules for Portable Fuel Containers, Mobile Equipment Refinishing and Repair, Consumer Products (along with the 2006 OTCModel Rule), and Architectural and Industrial Maintenance Coatings establish a benchmark for reasonably available control technology for these source categories. Certification of NOx RACT Requirements Table 2 lists the Department's NOx RACT regulations, thebasis for the regulation, the citation of EPA's approval ofthe SIP revision, the RACT rule applicability and requirements, and certification that the current rule represents RACT under the 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Where Maine has certified that a current SIP-approved regulation represents RACT under the 8-hour ozone standard, it states that it is not aware ofany significant changes in control technology that affect the original RACT determination. The Department previously used (for the 1-hour ozone NAAQS) a cost of $1,500/ton of NOx as a benchmark value when determining cost-effective control technology for NOx sources subject to the Chapter 138 Reasonably Available Technology For Facilities that Emit Nitrogen Oxides (NOx RACT) requirements. These controls continue to represent RACT for the 8-hour ozone NAAQS because NOx control technologies have not changed substantially since the mid-1990's. Although capital ; costs for certain control technologies such as SCRand low-NOx burners have remained fairly constant, the annual operating costs have significantly increased due to price increases forurea, electricity and operating labor.
9This is equivalent to a VOCcontent of0 .25 percent.

### The Department's other NOx RACT regulation, theChapter 148 Emissions FromSmaller-Scale

Electric Generating Resources rule, addresses multiplepollutants from stationary generators having a capacity equal to or greaterthan 50 kilowatts. This rule requires non-emergency generators to meet an emission limit that is equivalent to the use ofselective catalytic reduction (SCR)when applied to stationary diesel engines. Major Source VOCand NOx RACT As previously noted, the CAAalso requires RACT be appliedto any major existing stationary source with the potential to emit 50tons or greaterperyear ofVOCor 100tons or greater of NOx in the Ozone Transport Region. Maine's Chapter 134 Reasonably Available Control Technology for Facilities that Emit Volatile OrganicCompounds (VOC RACT) rule applies to all Maine sourceswith potential VOCemissions of40tpythat are not regulated specific regulationl°, whiletheChapter 138 Reasonably Available Technology For Facilities that Emit Nitrogen Oxides (NOx RACT) rule applies to all Maine sources with potential NOx emissions of 100tpythat are not locatedwithin the region subject to the section 182(f) NOxWaiver. Table 3 lists all majorsources in Maine, along with their licensed (potential to emit) emissions ofVOC and NOx. It should be notedthat many NOx sources are located within the nine-county NOx Waiver area, andare thus exempt fromfederal NOx RACT requirements. Many VOCsources are also exempt fromthe requirements oftheSIP-approved Chapter 134, which states: C . Exempted VOC emitting equipment or process. The following VOC-emitting equipment or processes are exempted in determining a facility's total VOCemissions: (1) VOC-emitting equipment or processes that are subject to regulation under 40 CFRPart 61 : National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS) ; (2) VOC-emitting equipment or processes that achieves Best Available Control Technology for VOC or the Lowest Achievable Emission Rate for VOC, as determined by the Department and imposed in an air emission license which contains specific emission limitations for all affected VOC-emitting equipment or processes and was issued pursuant to federally approved permitting regulations or regulations promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ; (3) VOC-emitting equipment or processes that receive RACT, as determined by the Department in accordance with the following: (a) Pursuant to a VOC control regulation approved by the EPA for which a Control Techniques Guideline (CTG) document was written, or (b) As contained in a federally enforceable air emission license issued by the Department prior to the applicable effective date; (4) VOC-emitting equipment from which the VOCs emitted are fromthe incomplete combustion ofany material, except where material is heated, burned, combusted or otherwise chemically changed under oxygen-deficient conditions by design; (5) Kraft Recovery Boilers; (6) Indirect contact woodkilns and wood yards; and 'o Specific processes at these facilities may be covered by aCTG . 9(7) Paper machine area emissions which include paper machines, and the finishing and converting areas. 

### After reviewing existing stationary sources in Maine, the Department has determined that all major sources ofVOCand NOxare currently meeting RACT requirements" (see Table 3)
. The Department hasdetermined, however, that the single-source VOCRACT determination for McCain Foods USA, Inc., Tatermeal Facility (Tatermeal) (air emission license amendment#A-459-71-D-A) was not submitted to EPAfor incorporation into the SIPat the time ofissuance. This SIPsubmittal therefore includes, as Appendix A, theTatermeal single-sourceVOCRACT air emission license amendment for incorporation in the Maine SIP. In addition to the currently-licensed major sources outlined in Table 3, a number ofsingle source RACT determinations have been previously issued to sources that are now permanently closed. These sources andtheir RACT approvals are summarized in Table 4 . Post- 2005CTGs Eleven new

CTGs have been issued by EPAsince September 2006. These include: Control Techniques Guidelines for Industrial Cleaning Solvents, EPA-453/R-06-001 ; Control Techniques Guidelines for Offset Lithographic Printing and Letterpress Printing, EPA-453/R-06-002; Control Techniques Guidelines for Flexible Package Printing, EPA-453/R-06-003; Control Techniques Guidelines for Flat Wood Paneling Coatings, EPA-453/R-06-004; Control Techniques Guidelines for Paper, Filmand Foil Coatings, EPA-453/R-07-003; Control Techniques Guidelines for Large ApplianceCoatings, EPA-453/R-07-004; Control Techniques Guidelines for Metal Furniture Coatings, EPA-453/R-07-005; Control Techniques Guidelines for Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Parts Coatings, EPA-453/R-08-003; Control Techniques Guidelines for Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials, EPA-453/R-08-004; Control Techniques Guidelines for Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives, EPA-453/R-08-005; andControlTechniques Guidelines forAutomobile and Light-Duty Truck Assembly Coatings, EPA-453/R-08-006 The Department has determined that there are no applicable sources for two ofthese new CTG categories (Control Techniques Guidelines for LargeAppliance Coatings and Control Techniques Guidelines forAutomobile and Light-Duty Truck Assembly Coatings) andwill be submitting negative declarations. For the remainingcategories, the Department will be undertaking rulemaking in the near future.

" Anumber of major sources are subject to BACT/LAER ; RACT is less stringentthan either ofthese control levels, so these facilities alreadymeet RACT under existing permits. 

### 100 .H `V

=V W .H U U 

### U 0 

### W -0 04 1. d Ey e~a v 0 0 N i . O 

# x

... w 0 U

p i G1 o ai o ai o ai o °' ° °' ° °' ° °' ° v ° °' ° °' o v o "~ U c c c c c c c c c ~ O ~r M

~ w au a$ N ro v v ~ ~ ~ ~ v ~ >

F-i OL ~' O L

r O ~ O F O ~ O ~ O ~ O F O ~ O

4V y~y,
V1

~ I~I 1~1 ^ ^ d . M r+

^

~ M ^I rl ^ ^ M ^ ~I

~ M ^ ^

~ M ^

~ M ^ ^
~ M ^ ^
~ M ~I

^

~. M

~ ' Crr ~ C~ P

r ~ ~o, ^°, ~a, ^o, ^o, ^ o~ '"o~ ^o~ ^o~ ^~
G~ O '~ . . " y Z A Y ~ J

h ~' O ~ , r, w



### z z z z z z z z z z
0 

### . x 0 E o, z ~ w a~ ~ w ° °~ ~ ~ ° ° ~ wo ~~ o °~'~ c4 c on ~ on c ~= ~

° 3 A- o, a~ ~ o a, c ~ o o 0 0, o c F V .o . -d .o ° ~ .a

- a.

E ~S ~, ~ ~ (,,) ~ ~ ~ Z ~ ~ > C ~w N ~ "CE U v F"' o ~4 !~I 4~ ~ ~ 4W ° ~ p .i . .. c~i 3 M ~ ~ ~ v~ VD f ~ d .6 5 o, 24 r- w. .,c ° F~ ° a o f- o0 ° c c _ ° ~ a °c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° '~U~ U~

~ " .

~ " L L " L " O Uj L '"' ~ ~ V] c y v~ a~ v~ cd a~ v~ cC a~ ~n

N a~ v~

cd U y y

° v~ O O~ N y ~n O O~ ° o ° ~ ° o a d o °- ¢ L ~, o .~ F, o .~

~, o L ~, o L ~, o c o

U °L' o 4 z a o U °: o L z

~! ~!1 V1 Vl o M Vl 1 M ~ M ~ M~ M ~ M M y~ M ~ M P4 ~ C4 ~ CC ~' C4 ~w~w ~w~w c~w o~w ~w

a~ a~ a~ ° a~

cz .O L p cd ' N y ~ o C D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C bA p ln cd bA bA

~ ~ ~ O ~ U C ` bLD d wp ~ " L+ + O a . -' Q "Y ~y LbA .L .+' L ' iC

U ~ .G ° '~ ~~ N °U
b.p o ~ U ~3 y ~ ~ `~ ~ > ~ ° ~ ' ~ w~ U o v' ~ wo p , L o >C v ~ v~ ~ .o t p U U c0 a

'

. 2 .^ '' a) 4 . 'v~ cC U a) U ~ C p L a) L N U ~ U ~a a ~ N p ~ o p Q' w a~ " ~ L L .'r p bA p a U bA E C ° o m a7 ~ t~p p y ,. d d Q " ~ ' V ~' ~ " ~ ~ G 

### z z z z z O U O ~O L c~ al ai ,~ cC L O . L ~ k 

### oQ ~- > ~~ .Oj) b ~ U .=J5 C U ~ ~ L p~ ,~ O p O cc3 

### o ~- L~ Ua Uw~ o = ~~ -

° ° w Q ai ° 'o ~ E U '~ c p o U 01 U ~ ~ M CJ ` .1 O E O4 ~ . o, > l- U C .' '- ci~ O

j O ~ cC GJ .N ~ W " y !'' ~ ."' ~ U ~' ~ ~_ C ~ ~" 7 +L' U U ~' U ~ s.+ L CC L Vl ~ R$ ~

# ~>y

U rn ~ ~

# yC

7 l~ p ~' ~ v'U ~° i .-U .,g4 ~(~O a UG~ Ci c N°

° L o ~ yo U .° o U E"' N ~ N N o a . ~ " L ~. , o y ~ y ~ ~ N N-~ > O cd (~ N p h~~cn caOUU
o F~ o0 o F- 00 o F-~ o0 o F~ o0

" U 'y U S L ~ ~ p V

j o ~ ~ y p ~ /~ G' ~, L p V U v~ y . p V U ~n y, o d U ln L ° a 'p Q" ~ Q 'p ~ G' O ~ p

r- O 

### U2 ~ .~z z U 2, 

### z UL~~z

O M O M ,-, M d" M~ M ~ M IZ w~R w Q~ N l~ O~ N O ~ O~ ~O v1 Nv1 ~O v1 v~ l~ ~O vi

U L .C N s.N . ~ bA U `~ on cz v o ~ an o u ~cd ou ~ ~ °dn < ~ ° E c .° A

" o ~_ >, _~a ~ ' ~ =S 7~5 U_ o a~ ~ ° ~ = U ~ I ° E _S

U ~ to L
~ " U ~ ' ~ C U y " > iC " = a~ S c. .~ .~ " ~ ~0 .^ .D 'C cUd N ~ N > U y" '~ iC n' w L O

> ' > °M a~ ~ "_ U 3 ^ "b 'O ~ y O 4~ ~ cC

~ ~ . cpC ~ O p ° ~, O E O~ _ > ° `~ ^ r U "'

n + N 'O p > cC ``" ~ " _ a ~ vi . ~ U C QE ' ~"' ~ ,r bD o ~ . : ; c 'c4 "°- E ~ E ~

:2 g ~ " ~ 06 o N o
~ bp p " p ~ 'D ~ ~ ~ U bA O .~ ' L c~ iC " ~ p~,p O ~ a, L L' 'C a~ U 7 O N a L '^ ~ v~ ~ E ~ ' > a~ 3 ° a ~ o o c a~

i ~ L N ° ~ > 3 ° °? ° ~ wa~ .a ~ O o . U E ~? _ U.

10 ~ " ~ ~ ~ '° U a~~, ~ c c~ o + o c - ~ " 2 W T 'a N °L' ~ = c ~ "'C> s "' ` ~ w

a> cz ~ ° c

` U

p ' Oa

"~ ° ~, o U 'q O U r- E ? Q " «3 `n "O O

cG

. U O ~ cd O U ~ ° U ~ 'Q 'O C U U s'"' _ > O Y U Q" cC

x bq " " ~' CG C .~ 'O V1 G . U ~ ~.'" ~ U 7 O O .r a) O O 

# ~3''i

a~ ~ a ~ o U ~ C O C p U ~ ~ ~ bA U ._ ~ o _ N c'' -o U U S . °n ,., i' o °° c,, ~n v~ °° E ~ ~ ~ a~ -o p O .Y

~ L L y 0

. 15 cC

~ ' :_ ~ ~ C a~ 6 . 4 ? ' ° a

# °~"~.

~ ~ ' E o ~ °~ m ° L -o cd c ~ 

# ,rcd

~ " p p y E o O h L .= U 0 . . Uw ai O ~r F-~ L O ~n L N '~ O E" ~n U W O U > O F-' L .= U fY U W F .

L w a 0 o v bb

. bio

. U o o ~ U~ ` v w ~n +~ ~n ~ w ci ,~ , cn .d p °° p ~ O, ~ _ " ~ a~ NC p p . N~r , Mo E-r o0 o F- o0

i ~ y N ~ sU . ~, 

### oa ~~ ~~Loa L L N N L Q y L y ~ ~ L Q y ., L ~ 

### u 2
° ° M M y~ M M `p M ~ Vl y~ M ,,~ ~w O~ 7 cr, w w N ° ° ^~

C ~ ~ M

O ~ C O ~ L O b11 V 'O

~ ~ ~ ~ c~d

. N ~ ." . .O cd c9 4 "O fn y,U, ~ ~ ~ C y T3 cd "O j bA Q ~ ~ U ~

O ~ ~ ~y CC O . f~JJ bA .' ;^ w E cNd

_ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~bA 0 M " ~, OA ^ -hr L' ^ C N " U C yr Q WO ~ ~', . .~ . rj, 'J ' O . L y+ . L ~ RS U C U cz U cC cd

U ~ .~ O m N O ~ 0U ? " ~ O ~ L 7., ~ ^~j = = '~ ~ ~ O ~ y '3 ,~ 8 O ~ ~ 'O

~ o C C au p C ~ W

.L~'~ N U O O N X

~ ~ N ~ L . LU

" .C C O .. t C

y . = G' ~ b E > ~ c~ qp pv 6-1 O.C ~ v' y ~ .O bJJ E E ~, C to

O ~ ~ L [~/1 U C Uu tt O CA ° ~., O[-' N c~ rWn O A
~ ~' LU

+ > CZ b °o, > ~ ~~ ~ .~ >,

~ . o c ;o c cz ~ C O > `~ ~ 'O N , L ~, y Y 9 y A

. c~ p, ~ C O O cqi o ~ `~ ~ .°3 ~ . ° w E .°3 ~ - °L' '~ ° a o F n ~ u an ~ ou °: > ~cs ° .5 -~ .°3 3 o o a F 0 0 3 U- o ^

. O r U U

- L _C " C ~+ N ~ NCir M O N~1o F- o0 0 E- o0 o F~ oo " ° U ¢ = ~ c ~ y c a~ ~ c V1 i .L O V ~ VJ y, O V '$""" (n yy O ~ V L ~ Cu L Q 

### "r L, ~ QJ L. Q ~+ ~ N L ^ Q 

### ~ ~ ~ 0 z

p M M M CI _'

~ W ~w ~w o~w N

bp ~ .~ ,_r O " ~ O O to
~ cz "iC ~ G' N " N y ~ '~ O " ~ ^ ~ " G U C ~ ~Q~ 4~ ~ C O Q . ~ " U G N s 1

~ ~ j E y pA s" ~ y~ C

. v~ U t . s . w ,F? > O ~' 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ° N i cd ^ 5 ° c > U U U O ~ ~ a
~ ~' CZ

° o 'o

s-r `' " ~ U O w ~ ,x O

"

. > sW .. s . '7 O ~

U cC ~ U O ~ C ct 'O r >> a L' cC O y cC

^1> rn U 'L7 Q" '7 a+ A . c C ~ '115 -' U O N cd bp ~ ~ ~ U W

~i U U O O ~ v' O ~ ~ ~ O 'O '-'

L1 ~' M ~ . C '-' N pp C O O " ~ OU " s" C s-. C . ~ Q" L' 'O U ^ M ~ C O
~ «Y "a O ~ 3 O ~ y ' ~ W~ U 2 2 ¢' w ~

CIO

~ U . '~~' y ^~ v~ ~ ~.. ~ a" v~ CJ . i' O CC > O . a 'O U a . . U ow

~ Q" N ~, ~

° x `Y 3 '° ¢ U ' cz ~ U U-

~ . ~ " + c c~ oj IG >

ct G cw N ~ p b ~ A .y ~ p O,' U IC Cy ~,^ U ~O U ~ ~ C O ~ O o f-L- ° :~' '~ u ~ a.~ . ° wE °3 O -"o o a"- rx F~-" op ~ U L
> L

O O y 'x ~ a ^ 

# a

U ^ U ~ cd bA O O w Nw N~23 c`°~, ` .-" «Y °~o a~ ~ "~ c O = -a to o ~ ,Cd .v ~ . U " = «3 =' N U 3 0 s Q" - .- O - .`~ 'U ~" c~ W N

LL cd o E o o ~,

_ ++ aS dj L -0 C-4 L;:; - p C 7 CL. u

E ~ - a~ >, ~ > ' b=~ N A ~ s
~a~ N U

~ ~ U on o >

~ p O.~b

A ~ U ~ ~ ~ 3 0 a ~ 3 E-~ ° p cC n °' 9 w d r ~ . -~ 0 s~ . L c - . o E~ oo U ~ o '~U~ Qo~ " a4 a~ c ~ y N ~,:,

L O O bD C) ~ ~ ti ¢ 7~ Q 

## o -7 ' r " S 

## U~~~~z z

00 O~ ~ M M
N N

" u cd p E " ~ N ~ p ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ p ~ a' L ~ " ~ QO

. T . . U ~ ~ fl p 4r o 0 3 .`~~° o o Q, ~ r ,.~ °

c ~ ,~ Y ~ aL~ L 3 orn ~'' p ~ p a~ = 'a ~ - :

O . U °" o .o ' ' C .

~ ~ N ,O a) O, s~

~ ~ c o ~ ~~ Q +- y ~ . ~ Y N

^" U _ O 'L ^' , " O . '~ 't/ ~ ,O ~+ ~

=s > " O C ~

~C, O . L ~ ct L T L r ~ ~ m o' O C~. c u , °

Q "~ 

# s

cd U ~ , .., ~ a) C p 4~ y O .~ v~ p c ~ `~° a ~ ,7, -0 H.b ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 U ~ ~ C W .o CZ -0 U p . o '-' a, L - - ;, aao

~ " " ~ -d _~ ~ w 1 p O L 7 ~J ~

~ C~ ~ ~

" U C~ ~ ~ ~ ^~ U L 1~0 v on 

# u~~SaL",v bAp~ C~SrC~y ~, >' [/Lp 7 O r"~"'bAGL 

# ~ O~i.+pL~ ., °, ~°'

O
~ 3 -, CC ~ .~ ~ ° o :c o O

-- °L' ~ s ~ ~ 8 a~ o N o ~ p N a~ n < ~ o ~o .c o ~ cc o Q E- cn ~p a~ o ci. r~ . . .

c, n . ~. a a~ ~ F- L

00 N

O'w ~ 

# ovi

p ~ U ~ A p ~ pp 'b ~ N L oo °` a, N ~ N UH ¢ o o

N

p M M M o~ w N p

GJ w ^1 V ~ ~ 'G N ~,' ~ bD M N ; N C bA N ~D a~ o v' ~ ~ y

~ " 5 'E '~' ~ o `~ ~ }, `~ ~ ~ .c `~ 3 w 0 a) M U U V ~ c~ O i ~ >, cd '~ C T7 .fl~' E U U o U v' cc ct ~ ~ = x o v ~ y 'A o A m Cy,' U
~ ~ Y ~ V U r .+

E ~

_ N a O -0

" - ¢ cc ,

ca V C 00 G~ ._ N O+' ca L L M ~ O L ; U 3 ,~' w Y 3 °- ~ >, o ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ o o .x z-- ~ >

~, ~ o ° a? ~ ~ ~ ca C N ~ ro V .~ N u ~ U ~ ~ o E- U s~,

to M m. ~ . , ~

o ~

. C~ -o ,

~ .o

~ U y ~ lu

_ O p C's M E'-' Ua ~ ~ 0 0 a a _ . o E L J 22 L

z Es i~ ~i m a 0 C, 72 C', C', cl, rq V5 ce u 5 0 r4

u C, E ;= U .- u CZ

QJ z U

C7, ":r rn m m

C=~ wl C=> C'l m r4 m C4 00 00 C :, r, - CA kn

C) 7 :3 C~ u 0j) z cz :2 cz C7, C5, C) t: C:? 0 C :, 2 ON olu tw twr- C~ll to
C-1 En cu gi. m 00o w on ,~

c °° 3 d o 3 N `o C ~

. ^ L E v, p e~ G ~ o ~ a a~ "v O "y ~

0 ~ w~ O N y ~ ~, ~ ~ a~ - a ~ o0 y " ~ " c~ "cC ~ "
.. ' C ~ C1 E " L U p 0 . Z '~ ~`" ^ '" ~'C
~ " ~ L

. o a~ o o,U o o ~ o a O
~ E-cC . ~ O C, n > V~ d U E sU . U C W

~d r

y O E^ 00 o ~ ~ U ~ LN Y C C' 00 o ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ b [~^ 00 o ~ U ~ ~ Y b ~^ o ct ^

. U " - a~ v (n U c

° U' a~ a~ y y C

~ W 0 v' y y Q d ' a~ U y U Vi L O a L C L ' y ~ ~ y n 7 ~, C ~ V7 L O a ~ ~ y s N L C VI L Oa L C y Vi L p a
_ O' " G1

. ~ O d Es Y~-i ~ L Q L O" C. b O d / N_ C L L u L v,

L R " b O d `_/~ ~ U y, ~ u N L a"' C CL E'~ Vi U L L '~ S~' z ~ ~ U L L ~ S," z F"~ V1 U L ~ 5 ., z E~' ~ U L L ~ S z

l~ ~D N 00 l~ ~p N l~ _M kr) O ~ M v1 OM V1 G~ . ~ CC, R OL~i ~O W ~ 0 .~ W W
. N OO N O ~ O M l- ^~ I- v1 l~ N [~

aJ ~ a~ U w " C " U L a~ a~ N

~ " O OL C c13 O " N w L S~ CL cd U ~

~ ~ a3 cC cd t

. U p ~ U U ~ > " O ~ O ~ O c~a ~ m 3 t p O ~ ~ " ~ U p CL y ~ 'r bA ~ p y U U cd w O ~ a" . wL ~

~ o o " L .~ . " v °? >, Q ~ o '~ ~ o ~ ~n ~ c ~' _ ~ o a, o c"~ "o o c _a~ "~ '^ L

" U E U Vi ¢~, C ~ 4~ ~ ~ ro O ~ U ~ ¢- Cl U ~ U ~ ~ c ~ " - bp ~' ~ " " , 'C _' ~ N v~ ~ " ~C bD C ~ + C ._ . C 1:10 " ' U " M cd cC

. ~ v~ U

" U U cC ~ '^ G E ^' 'T~ .

U . ' O G d ^ U ~n ~ O ~ " p C a~ O i' 4, U "13 p - a~ ~ ~ U
~ O " ~ a~ a~ " C d O L G U b'D O S1 ~ p >, C~ A L .r ~ O O L w 

# cd"U "~C"~ c cd" . .- ~ cd C C .' 'x ~ ~ C p O U L U ~ J ~ ~ U ~ Y ~ ~ c o U ~ cS n " a c U 3 p " U U ~ U ~ a ~p N ~ 0 1 y bA \O .-2 y ~ \p bp 7 " U

. U p "=

. cU~ o o `° ~ cd i O! . F-' O cz3 U O, Or F' O 0~ O . O ~ F-~ O L 7 _C 

# Of/~F-~Ow w

~ O ~ O vi ' C N C N i i ~Q~ C U p ~" C "~ :' O ~ O

.q O v O v O O y
" " '° b " a ~

. " U ~ '

~ O i-U 00" 00"' 0 .~ 6~ O 7 U U ° - UW ~ E t~ ~ a t: O 7= OQ . :~ ~ Clo

. ~ °~. ~ p~o o~, a - ~ a ro N C ~ U cod N ~ C O G1 O

Lt U ?? ~ C O bA C p
N 4~ O O 4~ N 4~ ~ ~ N W ~ Y W Q C ~ C " C C C O _ ON O " ~ :~ ON 7 ON 'O O x Ow OA"' ON 7 y ; d W O x N 7 OO O ~ a 0 r a r c No F~ o0 '~U~ c `' C ~ o v~ 

### =~~oa L ~ N L Q

~fr' 0

M O Ow v ~o

a3 U

~ °~ .E U ~cG c~o
~ ~a L L . , ~ LI W ~, 7 Y U ~ .`ti ^ O

. °w~ :°[-^ ;o 0 o ° i "~ ~ a o . cL w ~ - ~, o >, O ~ ~ ~ U M ~U a `'~ w° c~

.~ c a ~a U ~° E `°

n a~ s' ~ ~ G _ , V s~ bl) ~ O

~; _y a~ a~ O . .-. 'd

c OU > F-~ Q ~ p .. O

U
V 00

_ .O 

### `~ O L7 " E'~ U 0 

### o Z O N0

. . i . U U 

### O N b 

### w 

### E V
0 N 0 

# x 00 

# a w A 0

.~ 0 

### .~ z ~ . ~U
X w V v ~ H o cn ;, U cn
o F~ o0 o F- o0 

### A e~ ~ o ~

. .. ~ ~ o0 0 -4a ~ ~ o ~ ~ L ooa o ~ .~ CIO ~ N oa~ V ci O ~ ¢ ~, .2 l N O ¢ ~ I~ 

### U ~ ~



### U~.w~ C O 

### ~ .~z ,~,



### U ~ . ~ C O 

### ~w 00 rq r- 

### o 0 w `~'w ~ LL Q c~ o > 

### Z A
ro °p ~ ~ a '_ ° cC '~ L k O T a) cC 

### Qz ce to V F 

### _ " _T .b ~ ~ ¢'

. C/~ ~ O ^i 4 W ~ V

~ ~ Cj ~

~ 'n O

E E 0 Cd ~`~+

O o'

" ~ i ccf cd o r ~ °' vl ~ a~ N cG Ey ~

~ aj C13

~ ocG ~ ,Y o U o .~ .~ b4 O MU -o o a, 00 

# y

., ~ cc w U ~ ~ o ; ; ;? 00 ` c t n, m

. VN V ~ L' GJ N on O, L a oz ~ ~ T-i Y ° ~ ~ y ~ a~ ° . 

### " - r .o -°z ~- O ~ w °° w kr) . w c :O o F-~ O f--~ U ~ 3 z o r~ F-~ cn ~ N
N 'L' ~?? O 00 '" C O . ~ O . R3 O a~ F-' O E a m ~ ~ o . W u lu ~ 00 " 00 ~ ~ y N c ~ ' M F ~I ~ ~ r~ o ,~ p O ~ . ~ N yO ~Oa .'N o

.. .o ~ ~ , [-' Q j (~ O a~ _~ ~ ,~_ ' Q a~ a~ .~ O M O ~

~ . W~ H° U ~ U `°N ~ T ~ ~ ~ c o ~ c~ ¢ : ~ o n 0

'O N U v~ ~ ~ ' C4 X J O 7~ ~ o E ~ ~ !r W ~ ~ O O ~ O N O O . U ~ UrnUa cncn F-OM h 0

F U

~ . 

### a C

.

.~ O 

# z i."

4o O a> cr s. 0 0

. U X O 0 ~ cC ~ . C a~ 'O ~p ` R ~~M~z N~m ~"~ I i - w a ~ ~ ~~ ~v ~ a ~ ~ e ; d ~a m °° " w ~ .~ m co

Q m ¢ m ¢ m

Qm a ~ m

a , m E ; y X ~ .9 ca >, ~ f1" ~ O U 7 " ~ C.O 'O c "flC .J , z °~ c ~ o, ^ N W .n ti_ wv, .o uuU ca UW ~=o "a a.a~ N72 U I ay~, a~ c Y o~ ~ E > -^ O R II . ,-~ X ? , Z X U ~ y ° OA .Y o ~ Z

~ Py ~ ¢ '3 c3 C' " Gi' 3 Q ' w N ' D p ~ R ~ n ~ w o ~ ° F °w' N ° ~' c z_ F~-

.O ~ Y = ` V'1 !/7 U m F'~ ol {_U U E' w

a
8 rpn O y Y ~ ti y

. cr 0

m ~ CIO

. ~ i Q ~+ a .

U "' '>U o U

o U 0 YC' o u ' p _ o = p U o C p C o C' p C p y p ic' ° o> X o

! . +r a

>~ N z

d0 " z O z
M z
Mz

n z
N >_ 'IT _ . . z __ O~ N z O~ N z kn N z (op

~ z M

~ O, .

V

. z 4 w ~ H a w M

i ,O o0 C' N M ~n O~ M o0 00 O ~O i t~ I~p a ~ O V ~!1 V O N V V M M t .

. a 

# ;
F~ " = °_ .b
u ` ~ rj) ~ p

~ ~ `° m ¢~ o w~a 'o v~ w ~

> o v~ a

w p :-~ o U cz ~ F- E w
a U G i

a O 0 . 4 C % >, r ° a ~ ', °° c, o ° cls : E', .o `° U o U o U U U U a c o I , .v . o a cn ..~ a U U
w o .a .~ 2 ° Q

~ w° v z
~ VD
~ V)
~ ~c m a° . O ~

a ~ ~ ~ ~

ca a . ° 

## __ `° ro m `o

m o m `o m o m `o m ~a U F" U o

U o U ca O o O ~ L] o 4 ~

V . M

M

. M

# l~ t~ ~n

oo ~n

~ v~ t N ~ [~ lO oo

~ M oo N I~ O ~O ~ ,~

p1 1- N "-~ O~ o0 M ~

N

# ~O N M

M

~ o0 N

a li) V

. _ ~.~ .- '¬ i - ---- -'-L.-_- ' c °' ° Oti -

¬ > o

. ' ~ a 3 p, 3 o m ° Q ~s °' ° .= ^ N d iz d d ; d ~ c 3v`-'U vn ° i a cnF" oj ~ ~ .~ w= Q y _` E ~ ~ - `~p f~ .°3 . .o o °' ~ u U ¬ I, - ~ ro ai UO
~ .°,

. r.0 3A y _Q' ~O cd ~ > > O ^ k

O ~O 'ca =_ ' p > 'O U ~ O >'w = U U co .0- Ep~ : C6 00 u u 00 001, u U > > CZ. 7Z rL C4 61 LEI t: EU u U C~ c, u u u u E: Gj

l 0 M . o C : 0 Ur- I 0 -

o clb

0 0 u 0 0 ) > > z 2 z z z z lz z z z Z LZ 1> Z LZ 

### z lr~ lr~
n r4 I&

L - '4R

00 r =

C4 It cq

- ~q It C, 11 10 00 C-~

0~ ( U O m

- . ~ M

~ ~ ~ CO O

~ n r

O ~ ~ v1 ' ¬ ,-. ~ ~ ~ V ¬ ~ 4 m

^ O T G

(V O M

.
i i

I O N

s ~ ~ ro c=a c`a c .y o ~ ~ w ^~ c~a ~ ,c o ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~3 o z ~x w ~ a ' r
a j R ;

¬ [ T ( ! 1 ~I o a~ >,~
: n, 

### U
~ i c '°

~ '° 

### U
~ 

### ~ E ~ 

### 4 ~ °° 

### ~ .°_ 

### s ,~ ~

`° 

### >, a, 

### >, a ° R ¬ ~ . .Y C,

- ° ~ U U U a o a a =

o a

° I U cLn c ¬ w ~ a

a a~ c ~ a~ E
~ a~ `° ~ a~ ~r. an t'a a~ ¬ `° ~° w° w° 

## =

F'~ c ~ g U -° k w (

~ w G . 3

~ i i w ~ i w i w N O C7 ,, C7 O ~ O x c c

` > c

` cC ~C ~ R aC on C aB ' N

oo N ~c

~o m oo 00 ~ m ma

`c oo N ~n

~ N v j ~ , N N~ ~o ~ ~c ,~ v °, '

o v ~ mN ~n N ^n o a' ~c 0 v -'T 0 -- i ! ~ !!!ILL M NT ~ i F

U ~ o ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ ~,o J . Q c p ~a o ~ c
~ ~ ~ i . cd C>, _ O o C

. = c3 ~ U " U o ~ y ~ ° 3 c4 ~ 0 . ~ Q C cd "C ~ w o wU ° N `~ o ~

o ° U : ° ; o m a

o ~' ca O ti - Q "n F ~ ° "~ m Q Q m mm o ca a, c : a o . c~ s ~ o ~ ~ i Q i~ v . o =ULQ

.~ o ~ Q ~ cc c pz','~t/Zvoy ., ~U F a~ c~¢ F i oU ° p p O N a. _ ~ ° ~ N O ~ V `_ . _ C 7 LJ ~ C' 7aJ .~ U Q Q `°

. ° - a aw ° O ~3 0 Qcnv~o,~O (

-.. U °' 3U ~ o_- ~o'ro ;r O

. A O c~' "~ ~ Qcpd m o v Q v0 0 °_? ~ o~ ° a ~ ~ ~ ° 9 ° °°U N ¢ ~ _ "C3 ~ N ~ Q! ~ ~ ~ " ,3 `3" p ~ O R > (~ C . ' rn ~ J ~ w a ~ w r v, '3 cC

c . c ~ _

~ u . v o ° ~ w ~,, 3 \~ o ~o ~ o c Y ~ c a W

° ~~ .n o ~ ~ ~ o o ~ ca ~ o o .~ o ~ o o+ v v~ o~ cn 01 UmF UUU=U o, U U a Q=y yU,

p ~ 7 O U ~ O U U ~ 7 ~ O O n

~ O O O p O O p C O ~ . ~ . pp ~. O 1 C' ' ~ > i C/1 > UO > V] > . 4 > aa j d U ~=

O~ >~ U

O > U

O > x °=

Ooz~ ~

o z U O > x '~ Oa z~ c

o z c 0 z °c o z U °: ~ 2, Oa O~ >~ z~ U

O > U ~ °: OOA- >z~ " ~ ~ ~ 01 1 01 l~ l~ ^ 00 CC

00 ~O I~ N

~ ~ M M V m p

p O M M ~n ~ N ~ 0

t~ fV

~n 'n 1

0 ~n C

M M

' N N 1~ ~ N

O, ~n ~p v~

l\ ~O 00 o0 ~ ~ l~ d" .--~

' ~n # o l N N

10 O N N O N O ~O ID ~ V N

(8 F 19 3 "a , i U N a i j N ~+ G i l 7 o

U a _

~ ~ `a

" ~ 1 ~ a z ~

~ m Y

w ~^ ~ ` ~ ¢ ~

V ~ CO o_n

. O E

~ d ~

° Y 1 ! a .~ ~ v ~ aC

, i ` [ ~ a ` ;3 0 ' I u ~ R ~ o a, - " Z U c ~

o °- E a~ °' o G V o

~ o ~ i U ~ ~ ~ o m O~ ¬ " "R .'0 N 7 g' ' a' ~ p= ~ ^ "_O U y ° ~' a. vol F 77 U ', J O .. Q Q Q "n Q CG p U c/1 , > a ` o ° o ' 3 ° `a z c .N 113 ~ z ac. ~ ~ ~ c .n c w _ > ~C o ° °" o w~ a

U c ro U ' ° O Y >, ~ ° _, ~ ~ ~ ~d E G_ p p cC ~ U 4 y U O >, ~ t ° ~ O c _ O

~ l~ N ( N m e~ M ~ N v M [- ~ N ~ m i ! O Na bt1o

O a a .n a . N N >
T T c b U T R V .C
Go v ° ^

x `~ ~ a w U °' o y z O o 0 o ? ti bc,

~ 4, o

N ~C 40 ., .N . ~ _a~ c~a .~o °' o `° 3 .o U p- cG 'b o _~, O o `° > ~ N Y s°' N N o .°9 W

Cc, c`a ° w ~ ~ a 3

" U c° o ~ ~° 8 x cd U .~ N V N cc V O 7 G ro ¢ CL ,~ o b N p^ N V a~ Y C7 a~ c~ i~ o bn .c ~-'

_ `a c " ~? ° w o a~ y_ " 3 ^ ~a -o ," ~ _ v ~ ro W U U b o ~ ~a o ~ ~ c~a ~ o o ca N .CC ,O U CT L" _

._ z °
. o ° `c' u~ .. F- = T o ~1 °r `o U o ° - U a~ ° on a=, "y ~ ~ c " _^ c ^ y <t ~_ i bA ~ V T O Q "p 'fl V a~ ° E O_ . -p U ~ = V L' 'O = r},

= L O V C O N

N O b11 Q V Cd CC y V N V U ~ N ~ N

o ~ y ^= U ~ p . o ~ > .~ ~ a`~ g N ~ .~ _ > o °' .o N cUa C LL, " U a ~ U ~3 c~ ~ o t ~ R a~ > a ° ,o

~ V ~ t' R ~ y b T = y F" ~ N 3 ~, ~ o = T 'o .fl o N V V bD N ~ y N ° a 3 o ° a=, 3 0 0 ?, 3 .0 3 ay 0 0 . - o °, ` o ~0 °' `o °= a o o ~ ~= o = °

N a> ~ o - ~, °' ~_ o a~ U ~ ~ = N Y c E o . . II . '~ ~ U ~ ~ CC 'D '3 U o ° N

y a~ ca ~ a~ ~ c a~ ~ ` `d ?~ V nn ~ en cd CID ! M " ~ bU = y cd O C cd = ^ a> >

i .r C N N O ^ OTA O O

O ^ .= X a~

" N " N ~ ' .~ G " ~ a~ ° ~" V o z °' U U ; U U v t=

o O °' on O p a `~ '°

## Table 4

Previously-Approved RACT Determinations for Major Sources of VOCand NOx in MaineThat are Now

Permanently Closed Name Applicable RACT Rule EPASIPApproval Date Tree Free Fiber LLC, 096-096 Chapter 138Reasonably 9/9/02 Augusta Available Technology For Facilities that 67 FR 57154 Emit Nitrogen Oxides (NOx RACT) (FormerlyStatler Tissue) Scott Paper, Winslow 096-096 Chapter 138 Reasonably 9/9/02 Available Technology For Facilities that 67 FR 57154 Emit Nitrogen Oxides (NOx RACT) Georgia Pacific Chip and 06-096 Chapter 134 Reasonably 4/18/00 Saw, Available Control Technology for 65 FR20754 Facilities that Emit Volatile Organic Com p ounds (VOC RACT) Prime Tanning, Berwick 06-096 Chapter 134 Reasonably 4/18/00 Available Control Technology for 65 FR20753 Facilities that Emit Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC RACT) Nissen Bakeries 06-096 Chapter 134 Reasonably 4/18/00 Available Control Technology for 65 FR 20753 Facilities that Emit Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC RACT) Moosehead Manufacturing, 06-096 Chapter 134 Reasonably 5/20/02 Dover-Foxcroft Available Control Technology for 67 FR 35441 Facilities that Emit Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC RACT) Moosehead Manufacturing, 06-096 Chapter 134 Reasonably 5/20/02 Monson Available Control Technology for 67 FR 35441 Facilities that Emit Volatile Organic Com pounds (VOC RACT) Dexter Shoe, Dexter 06-096Chapter 134 Reasonably 4/18/00 Available Control Technology for 65 FR 20754 Facilities that EmitVolatile Organic Compounds (VOC RACT)

## APPENDIXASTATE OF MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

JOHN ELIAS BALDACCI

GOVERNOR DAWN R. GALLAGHER COMMISSIONER 

### McCain Foods USA, Inc., Tatermeal Facility ) Departmental Aroostook County ) Findings of Fact and Order Presque Isle, Maine ) Air Emission License A-459-71-D-A ) Amendment#2 After review of the air emissions license amendment application, staff investigation reports andother documents in the applicant's file in the Bureau ofAir Quality, pursuant to 38 M .R.S.A., Section 344and Section 590, the Department finds thefollowing facts: I . REGISTRATION A . Introduction 1. McCain Foods USA, Inc. was issued license A-459-72-B-R for their Tatermeal facility (Tatermeal) in Presque Isle, Maineon April 22, 1997. 2 . McCain Foods USA, Inc. has requested an amendment to their license to address VOCRACT for the Tatermeal facility as required by Chapter 134of the Department's regulations. B. Emission Equipment Tatermeal is authorized to operate thefollowing equipment: Fuel Burning Equipment Equipment Maximum

Design Capacity Maximum

Design Firing Rate Fuel Type, Date of Control Stack# MMBtu/hr al/hr % sulfur Const. Device -Kiln#1 30 215 #6oil, 2.0% Pre 1974 cyclone 1 

### K iln #2 30 215 #6oil, 2.0% Pre 1974 cyclone 2 ~ Kiln #3 ~ 60 ~ 428 #6oil, 2.0% 1980 cyclone 3 C . Application Classification This application for Tatermeal is to address VOC RACT requirements as per Chapter 134 of the Department's regulations and to address newVOCemission data that was revealed in stack testing results. The application is considered an amendment andis being processed as such. AUGUSTA 17 STATE HOUSE STATION AUGUSTA, MAINE 04333-0017 (207) 287-7688 RAY BLDG

., HOSPITAL ST. BANGOR PORTLAND PRESQUE ISLE 106 HOGAN ROAD 312 CANCO ROAD 1235 CENTRAL DRIVE, SKYWAY PARK BANGOR, MAINE 04401 PORTLAND, MAINE 04103 PRESQUE ISLE, MAINE 04769-2094 (207) 941-4570 FAX : (207) 941-4584 (207) 822-6300 FAX: (207) 822-6303 (207) 764-6477 FAX: (207) 764-1507 web site: www

".,tate.tne.u~idep printed on recycled paper

### McCain Foods USA, Inc., Tatermeal Facility ) Departmental

Aroostook County ) Findings of Fact and Order Presque Isle, Maine ) Air Emission License A-459-71-D-A 2 Amendment#2 II . AMENDMENT DESCRIPTION A . McCain Foods USA, Inc., on November 13, 2002, submitted an application to amend their license to address reasonable available control technology (RACT) for volatile organic compounds (VOC) as required by Chapter 134 of the Department's regulations for their potato waste drying facility (Tatermeal) located in Presque Isle, Maine. Chapter 134of the Department's regulations requires that any facility that has the potential to emit 40 tons or more of VOC per calendar year is subject to the requirements of Chapter 134 . The facility was not thought of in the past to emit VOC in quantities in excess of 40 tons per year. However, after stack testing performed in November, 2001 revealed that VOC emissions are higher than originally licensed, it has been determined by the Department that the facility is subject to Chapter 134

. On August 14, 2002, the Department requested that McCain Foods USA, Inc. submit a VOCRACT analysis in accordance with Chapter 134Part 3, Subpart A . McCain Foods USA, Inc. conducted an alternative feasibility study in accordance with the plan requirements for Option C : VOC Alternative Reduction Program (SourceSpecific RACT Determination) of Chapter 134 . B . Equipment Description Tatermeal operates three dryers that dehydrate primarily potato wastes to produce a material used as a binder and nutritional supplement in animal feed. The potato waste is supplied by McCain's operations in Easton, Maine and other regional food-processing plants, as well as by local growers. The three dryers are directcontact rotary dryers that combust#6fuel oil with asulfur content no greater than 2.0%sulfur by weight. Potential VOC emissions fromfuel combustion in the three dryers is approximately 1 .7 tons per year based on a 1 .28 pound of VOCper 1000 gallons of #6 fuel emission factor that was taken fromthe Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors (AP-42) andthe current license annual fuel usage limit of 2,628,000 gallons of #6 fuel oil peryear.

### McCain Foods USA, Inc., Tatermeal Facility ) Departmental

AroostookCounty ) Findings of Fact and Order Presque Isle, Maine ) Air Emission License A-459-71-D-A 3 Amendment #2 As stack testing has revealed, there is significant VOCemissions fromthe drying of the potato waste in addition to the small amount of VOCemissions fromthe fuel combustion. During stack testing, three test runs were made for each of the smaller dryers, Dryers #1 and #2, while four test runs were performed for Dryer #3. Testing was conducted for various mixtures of potato waste and the results indicated a wide variation in hourly VOC emissions rates. Potential VOC emissions were estimated for each unit assuming the highest measured hourly emission rate occurs for each of the 8,760hours of the year and adding a 15% safety margin to account for operational variability and flexibility. Using this approach, potential VOCemissions fromthe three dryers is estimated at 70.0 tons peryear for Dryers #1 and#2 each and 65.6 tons peryear for Dryer#3, for a total of approximately 205.5 tons ofVOCas carbon peryear for all dryers combined. Tatermeal also utilizes a Safety-Kleen parts degreaser that is used to clean equipment parts. The degreaser utilizes Safety-Kleen PremiumSolvent, which is 100%VOCs. The facility uses no more than 50gallons of solvent per year in the degreaser, which amounts to VOCemissions of approximately 0 .2 tons peryear. C . Feasibility ofAdd-On VOCControl Equipment As required under the Option C Plan Requirements of Chapter 134, McCain Foods USA, Inc. examined the technical and economic feasibility of available add-on control device equipment for the dryers at the Tatermeal facility. This examination included consideration of incineration, condensation, wet and dry scrubbing and biological treatment .

. 1 . Thermal Oxidizer/Incinerator Both thermal and catalytic incineration was considered in the VOC RACT feasibility study. Incineration is an oxidation process in which organic compounds areconverted to carbon dioxide andwater. a. Thermal incinerators are classified as either regenerative or recuperative. The regenerative incinerator utilizes a flame-based combustion chamber that connects two or three fixed beds containing inert (i .e. ceramic) packing. The exhaust streamenters the incinerator through a bed, which preheats the gas to near its final oxidation temperature. Thegas then flows into the combustion chamber, where it is oxidized. The regenerative incinerator typically achieves efficiencies of from 95%to 99% . This design has a high initial andoperational cost associated with it.

### McCain Foods USA, Inc., Tatermeal Facility ) Departmental

Aroostook County ) Findings of Fact and Order Presque Isle, Maine ) Air Emission License A-459-71-D-A 4 Amendment#2

b. The recuperative incinerator utilizes a shell and tube heat exchanger to preheat exhaust gases before they enter a combustion chamber where, exposed to a flame, volatile organic compounds are incinerated. This design is typically used in applications with lowgas flowrates and high VOCdensities and in these applications can achieve efficiencies of 98% to 99.9% . However, this design has a much lower thermal efficiency, and as a result is far less economical for applications with high flowrates and low VOCconcentrations such as those fromTaterrneal . c. Catalytic incinerators are similar to recuperative incinerators, modifying the flame-based incinerator to utilize a catalyst to promote incineration at lower temperatures. Catalytic incinerators are most effective in applications where there is little change in VOCconcentrations and where contaminants that could foul the catalyst are not present. Where the concentration of volatile organic compounds is inconsistent and the likeliness of clogging or deactivation of the catalyst from particulate matter carried in the exhaust streamfromdrying potato waste, a catalytic incinerator is not a viable candidate for this application. The catalyst is also subject to contamination fromsulfur and vanadium fromthe use of auxiliary fuel burning. Tatermeal will be firing #6 fuel oil with a sulfur content of 2.0% sulfur by weight in the dryers, which would cause a decrease in catalyst life and as a result a decrease in the systems overall efficiency. For these reasons, use of a catalytic incinerator is not technicallyfeasible for this application. d. Given the limitations of recuperative thermal oxidizers and catalytic oxidizers, McCain Foods USA, Inc. examined the cost associated with installation and operation of a regenerative thermal oxidizer to determine the economic feasibility of this design for use in VOCemissions reduction for the Tatermeal operation. Based on vendor information provided to McCain Foods USA, Inc. fromQuality Engineered Solutions, Ltd. (QES) of Fredericton, New

Brunswick, Canada, the total capital investment for an RTO, including purchased equipment costs and direct and indirect installation costs, would be approximately $2,349,470. The annual cost to operate and maintain the RTO were estimated to be approximately $1,161,961 per year, assuming the use of 0 .5% sulfur #6 fuel oil as auxiliary fuel
. Based on information fromQES as provided by several incinerator suppliers, 95%VOC removal efficiency was assumed for the RTO for the purpose of the cost evaluation.

### McCain Foods USA, Inc., Tatermeal Facility ) Departmental

Aroostook County ) Findings of Fact and Order Presque Isle, Maine ) Air Emission License A-459-71-D-A 5 Amendment#2

As indicated above, potential VOC emissions as carbon from the three dryers are approximately 205.5 tons per year and assuming a 95°Io efficiency of the RTO, VOC emissions would be reduced by 195.2 tons per year. The resulting cost effectiveness based on capital and annual cost would be approximately $ 17,989 per ton of VOCremoved. If the capital costs are annualized assuming a ten-year economic life for the control equipment and a seven percent interest rate, the cost effectiveness would be approximately $7,667 per ton of VOC reduction. Based on this analysis, discussions with vendors, and EPA documentation, the high capital and operating costs associated with use of an RTO make this technology infeasible for control of VOC emissions fromthe dryers at Tatermeal . 2. Condensation Applications with a condenser alone, a condenser with refrigeration and a condenser with chemical oxidation were considered in the VOC RACT feasibility study
. Condensation is a process in which volatile organic compounds are separated fromthe gas streamthrough saturation followed by a phase change. The phasechange is achieved either by increasing the system pressure at a given temperature, or by lowering the temperature at a constant pressure. In a two component system in which one of the components is non-condensable (i .e., air), condensation occurs at dew point (saturation) when the partial pressure of the volatile organic compound is equal to its vapor pressure. The more volatile the compound, the larger the amount that can remain as vapor at a given temperature, hence the lower the temperature required for condensation. a. QES conducted sampling in order to estimate the VOC reduction that could be expected fromTatermeal's dryers if condensation was utilized as VOCcontrol . QES estimated that the lowest temperature that the dryer exhaust could reasonably be reduced to was from between 150°F and 206°F down to between 80°F and 85°F. Thus, this temperature range was maintained during QES sampling. The exhaust gas sample was analyzed in accordance with the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Method 1500 and based on that analysis it was determined that the majority of VOCs in the dryer exhaust are not condensableat the 80°F and 85'F temperature range. Therefore, a condenser alone would not be a technically feasible option forTatermeal .

### McCain Foods USA, Inc., Tatermeal Facility ) Departmental

Aroostook County ) Findings of Fact and Order Presque Isle, Maine ) Air Emission License A-459-71-D-A 6 Amendment#2

b. The use of a refrigerated condenser was next evaluated. This type of technology is often utilized to obtain low temperatures required for acceptable removal efficiencies. This type of systemis normally used for operations with exhaust stream VOC concentrations above 5000 ppm, such as gasoline bulk terminals and storage. According to U.S. EPA, office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, "Survey of Control Technologies for Low Concentration Organic Vapor Gas Streams", condensation is not generally applicable to gases with organic vapor concentrations at levels belowseveral thousand ppm . If this technology were utilized, it would also generate a large volume of wastewater that would require the facility to construct an onsite wastewater treatment plant, further increasing the cost and operational burden ofTatenneal . The large volume of exhaust gas flowand the relatively low concentrations of VOCs in the exhaust stream, coupled with the need for wastewater treatment, make this technology a technically infeasible option for VOC control for the dryers at Tatermeal . c. QES investigated the use of a condenser in conjunction with chemical oxidation as a control device. According to QES, the design of the condenser would be a function of the total exhaust flowfromthe dryers. The condenser would need to be large enough to provide adequate contact time between the exhaust gas and the cooling water for sufficient energy transfer. It was assumed that a cooling towerwould be needed to cool the water from the condenser to a temperature adequate for condensation. Where thecondenserwould remove a certain amount of VOCs, a scrubber could be utilized to remove the non-condensable VOCs that remain in the exhaust stream

. The scrubber could be placed in thesystemdownstreamof the condenser and a chemical reagent could be injected into the scrubber to oxidize the non-condensable compounds trapped by the scrubber solution and asecond reagent would be needed to control solution pH . The VOCremoval efficiency of this type of systemis uncertain, although QES has estimated the efficiency to be between 50°7o and 90% . QES has indicated that an actual efficiency could not be determined without a substantial commitment in time andexpense to piloting activities. d. Given the limitations of utilizing a condenser alone or a refrigerated condenser, McCain Foods USA, Inc. examined the economic feasibility of the installation and operation of a condenser used in conjunction with a scrubber injected with a chemical oxidizer. Based on vendor information provided by QES, the total capital investment for a condensation/chemical oxidation system, including purchased equipmentcosts, direct and indirect installation costs, would be approximately $2,348,625. The annual cost to operate and maintain the system were estimated at approximately $986,667 peryear.

### McCain Foods USA, Inc., Tatermeal Facility ) Departmental

Aroostook County ) Findings of Fact and Order Presque Isle, Maine ) Air Emission License A-459-71-D-A 7 Amendment#2

As indicated above, potential dryer VOC emissions as carbon are approximately 205.5 tons per year and for the purpose of this evaluation, the VOC removal efficiency of the systemwas assumed to be 70% . This would provide for a VOCemission reduction of approximately 143.9 tons of VOC per year. The resulting cost effectiveness based on capital and annual cost would be approximately $23,186 per ton of VOCremoved. If the capital costs are annualized assuming a fifteen-year economic life for the control equipment and a seven percent interest rate, the cost effectiveness would be approximately $8,652 per ton of VOCreduction. These estimated costs do not include purchase, installation and operating costs of an onsite wastewater treatment operation. Based on this analysis, discussions with vendors, and EPA documentation, the high capital and operating costs associated with use of an RTO make this technology infeasible for control ofVOCemissions fromthedryers at Tatermeal . 3. Adsorption/Dry Scrubbing Adsorption is a process in which molecules adhere to a solid surface in a thin layer. In this type of system, the exhaust streamgases would pass through a porous solid and the volatile organic compounds would collect on the solid surfaces. This design can achieve efficiencies of 95% to 98%in applications where the VOCconcentrations are between 500 ppm and 2000 ppm

. Where the VOC concentration in the Tatermeal dryer exhaust is lower than these numbers, lower removal efficiency mayresult. QES found that vendors would not recommend this technology for application at Tatermeal because particulate matter in the dryer exhaust gases would likely cause plugging. Furthermore, this design does not accommodate large gas flow rates. Therefore, this technology is not a technically feasible option forTatermeal . 4 . Wet Scrubber/Absorption Awet scrubber design would allowfor the removal of organic and inorganic vapors in the gas streamby dissolving themin a liquid, usuallywater. Typical removal efficiencies for organic gases ranges from70%to 99% depending on the gas, type of solvent and type of absorber. However, this design in applications for organic gas removal is subject to several limitations and problems, including the availability of a suitable solvent andthe availability of vapor/liquid equilibrium data for the specific organic/solvent system of concern. The design is also susceptible to plugging if used in an application where there is a great deal of particulate matter in the gas stream . The wet scrubber design is more typically used in applications where gas concentrations are high. The tall towers, long contact ties and high liquid to gas ratios needed to obtain sufficient VOC removal may not make this technology economically feasible.

### McCain Foods USA, Inc., Tatermeal Facility ) Departmental

Aroostook County ) Findings of Fact and Order Presque Isle, Maine ) Air Emission License A-459-71-D-A 8 Amendment#2

For a wet scrubber to be effective, the vapors to be absorbed must be soluble in the fluid to be used, as only vapors that are soluble can be removed. Based on information supplied fromQES, a large variety of the VOCs emitted from the dryers are not soluble in water. In addition, a waste material and solvent medium treatment or disposal issue is created and as indicated above, Tatermeal does not already have a wastewater treatment facility and the local municipality is not interested in taking on the burden of treating the large quantities of VOCladen wastewater. For these reasons, use of this design is not considered technically or economically feasible. 5. Biological Treatment Biofiltration is the process of bringing the gas stream into contact with a biologically active material and microorganisms will break down the compounds into carbon dioxide, water, mineral salts and microbial biomass. Typical filter media are mixtures of compost, peat or biologically active soils. This technique is typically suitable for applications where the gas streamis of constant composition, ambient temperature, humidity and virtually free of particulate matter which would act to clog the bed pores. This design can be fragile and very sensitive to changes in temperature, pH and moisture that could cause bed sterilization. In order for this design to be effective at Tatermeal, the facility would have to increase the airflowto the exhaust gas streamto reduce the relative humidity of the gas streamto 50% . The biofilter itself would have to be approximately 2.5 acres in size to accommodate the large high flowrates of the exhaust gas and added air. No documentation could be found and no vendors could provide any examples where biological treatment has been successful in controlling emissions similar to those from Tatermeal's dryers, therefore this design is not considered technically feasible. D . The EPA RACT/BACT/LAER Clearinghouse (RBLC) was searched for any RACT determination made for equipment or processes similar to the potato waste drying process at Tatermeal . No entries were found in the Clearinghouse for any potato waste drying operations similar to those at Tatermeal . However, seven facilities were identified having the same Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code as Tatermeal, i :e., 2048, Prepared Feeds. Only one of the seven facilities addressed VOCemissions, Superior Agresources. BACT for VOCemissions for the dryers and pelletizing equipment at this facility was determined to be the use of natural gas, implying that VOCemissions were generated fromfuel burning. Where natural gas is not available at this time in Presque Isle and where the majority of VOC emissions are generated from the drying potato waste, converting to natural gas is not a technically or economically feasible approach to reducing VOCemissions.

### McCain Foods USA, Inc., Tatermeal Facility ) Departmental

Aroostook County ) Findings of Fact and Order Presque Isle, Maine ) Air Emission License A-459-71-D-A 9 Amendment#2 E. The alternative feasibility study for VOCRACT also requires examination of the technical and economic feasibility of changing to lowVOCemitting processes, i .e., pollution prevention options
. As discussed above, the vast majority of VOC emissions from the dryers are generated from the drying potato waste and the contribution to the VOC emissions fromfuel combustion is slightly less than 0.1%of the total VOCemissions. Any changes in fuel oil type or usage would result in relatively little VOC emissions reduction. Furthermore, reduction in drying time mayresult in a product with that has an unstable shelflife. McCain Foods USA, Inc. has made operational changes at the Tatermeal facility to reduce fugitive VOC emissions from the potato waste prior to the drying process. These changes include processing the oldest waste first and not accepting potato waste that has gone septic. However, it is not possible to quantify any actual emissions reductions that mayresult fromthese changes
. F. VOCEmissions McCain Foods USA, Inc. has agreed to restrict Tatermeal's total annual VOC emissions to 208tons per year on a twelve-month rolling total basis. Tatermeal shall maintain VOCemissions records to demonstrate compliance with the VOC emission restriction. The records shall be maintained on a monthly and twelvemonth rolling total basis. A copy of the record shall be submitted to the Department on a semiannual basis with submittals due within 30 days after the end of the second and fourth calendar quarters
. For the purposes of estimating the annual VOCemissions fromthe drying process at Tatermeal, an emission factor of 79.5 pounds of VOCper 1,000gallons of fuel combusted may be used, as proposed by McCain Foods USA, Inc. The factorwas calculated based on stack test data fromtesting performed in November, 2001 and assuming a linear relationship between VOC emissions, product produced and fuel consumed. Thecurrent license for theTatermeal facility includes an annual fuel restriction of 2,628,000 gallons of#6fuel at asulfur content of 2.0 % sulfur by weight basedon a twelve-month rolling total . Due to the calculation of the annual fuel restriction times the VOC emission factor being much less than the 208 tons of VOC restriction, maintaining this annual fuel restriction will ensure that the Tatermeal facility will not exceed theannual VOCemissions restriction.

### McCain Foods USA, Inc., Tatermeal Facility

Aroostook County Presque Isle, Maine A-459-71-D-A G . Annual Emissions ) Departmental ) Findings of Fact and Order ) Air Emission License 10 Amendment#2

Tatermeal has the following annual VOCemissions, based on a 12-month rolling total : Total AllowableAnnual Emission for the Facility

(used to calculate theannual license fee) Pollutant VOC Tons/Year

208 

### ORDER The Department hereby grants Air Emission License Amendment A-459-71-D-A

. .subject to the conditions found in Air Emission License A-459-72-B-R, in amendment A-459-71-C-Mand in thefollowing conditions: The following shall be in A-459-72-B-R: g. h. addition to Condition (12) of Air Emission License Tatermeal shall not exceed an annual fuel use limit of 2,628,000 gallons of #6 fuel oil, with a sulfur content of no greater than 2.0°Io sulfur by weight, based on a twelve-month rolling total
. McCain Foods USA, Inc. shall maintain fuel use records for the Tatermeal dryer system . The records shall be maintained on a monthly and twelve-month rolling total basis. The following is a new condition: (17) VOCEmissions A . B. C . Tatermeal's total annual VOCemissions shall be restricted to 208 tons per yearbased on a twelve-month rollingtotal basis. Tatermeal shall maintain a record of annual VOCemissions. The record shall be maintained on a monthlyand a twelve-month rolling total basis. Tatermeal shall submit a copy of the record to the Department on a semiannual basis with the initial semiannual report due January 30, 2004, for the period of July 1, 2003 through December 31, 2003. Subsequent reports shall be due on July 30 and January 30 of each year.

### McCain Foods USA, Inc., Tatermeal Facility ) Departmental

Aroostook County ) Findings of Fact and Order Presque Isle, Maine ) Air Emission License A-459-71-D-A 11 Amendment#2

(18) This amendment shall expire concurrently with Air Emission License A-459-72-B-R:

DONE AND DATED INAUGUSTA, MAINE THIS /Q,o DAY OF 1104,4 2003. 

### DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

PLEASE NOTE ATTACHEDSHEET FORGUIDANCE ONAPPEAL PROCEDURES 

### DAWN R

. GALLAG~R~COMMISSIONER

Date ofinitial receipt of application: November 13, 2002 Date ofapplication acceptance: November 14, 2002 Date filed with the Board of Environmental Protection: 

## MAR 20 2003 BOARDOF ENVIRONMENTAL PROT . - AINE This Orderprepared by,Peter G . Carleton, Bureau ofAir Quality