alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DATOS

RÁPIDOS

Departamento del Trabajo de EE.UU.

www.osha.gov (800) 321-OSHA

Para información más completa:

Administración de 

Seguridad y Salud 

Ocupacional

Protéjase

Seguridad de Generadores Portátiles

Generadores portátiles son usados con un motor de combustion interna para generar electricidad y están comunmente usados durante respuesta a desastres. Generadores

portátiles pueden ser peligrosos si se usan incorrectamente. 

Causas Mayores de Peligros y Fatalidades

• Descarga eléctrica o electrocusion por el uso incorrecto

de la energía o energizar accidentalmente otros sistemas

eléctricos.

• Monóxido de carbono por el tubo de escape del generador.

• Fuego por la forma inadecuada de poner combustible al

generador o la manera inapropiada de almacenar el combustible.

Prácticas de Trabajo Seguras

• Inspeccione los generadores portátiles por daño o perdida de combustible en la linea que pudo haber sido occurrido durante la transportación y/o manejo.

• Conserve el generador seco.

• Mantenga y opere el generador portátil de acuerdo con las

instrucciones sobre el uso y la seguridad del fabricante.

• Nunca conecte el generador directamente al sistema eléctrico de la estructura (casa, oficina, o remolque) a menos

que el generador tenga instalado una dispositivo de

transferencia debido a que esto crea un peligro de electrocución para los trabajadores de servicios.

• Siempre enchufe los dispositivos eléctricos directamente

al generador usando el cable suplido por el fabricante.

Use cables de extension de uso pesado que estén en perfecto estado que están conenctado a tierra (enchufe de 3

terminales)

• Use un interruptor de circuito con perdida a tierra según

la instrucciones del fabricante.

• Antes de echar gasolina nuevamente, apague el generador. Nunca almacene gasolina en el interior.

Envenenamiento con Monóxido de Carbono

Monóxido de carbono es un gas tóxico que es incoloro y

inoloro. Muchas personas han muerto de envenenamiento

de CO debido a que los generadores no estabán ventialados

adecuadamente.

• Nunca use un generador en la parte interior.

• Nunca coloque el generador afuera cerca de puerta, ventanas o ventiladores.

• Si usted o otros muestran síntomas de envenenamiento por

CO - mareos, dolores de cabeza, nausea, cansancio -

obtenga aire fresco inmediatamente y busque atención

médica.
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.6231(e)-1 Effect of a determination with respect to a nonpartnership item on the determination of a partnership item. ( a ) *In general.* The determination of an item after it has become a nonpartnership item with respect to a partner is not controlling in the determination of that item with respect to other partners. Thus, for example, the determination by a court in a separate proceeding relating to a partner that a certain partnership expenditure was deductible does not bind either the Internal Revenue Service or the other partners in a later partnership or other proceeding.
( b ) *Effective date.* This section is applicable to partnership taxable years beginning on or after October 4, 2001. For years beginning prior to October 4, 2001, see § 301.6231(e)-1T contained in 26 CFR part 1, revised April 1, 2001.
[T.D. 8965, 66 FR 50562, Oct. 4, 2001]
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Fl  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE** 

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2016, byand among Banc of America Merrill Lynch Commercial Mortgage Inc, as Depositor,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Rialto CapitalAdvisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCertificate Administrator, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee  and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisorand Asset Representations Reviewer with respect to Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates Series 2016-C31 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 of the Agreement, I, DanielBober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do herebycertify that:

 

1.  A review of the activities ofthe Master Servicer during the period from November 1, 2016 through December31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per theAgreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 

2.  To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
#### In the Matter of David R. Wendt, a Suspended Attorney, Resignor.

[807 NYS2d 320]

Resignation accepted, name stricken from roll of attorneys and order of restitution entered. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Kehoe, Martoche and Lawton, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 154 (Wednesday, August 12, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 40569]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19292]



[[Page 40569]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XQ70


Marine Mammals; File No. 1054-1731

AGENCY:  National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; issuance of permit amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  Notice is hereby given that the University of Florida, 
Aquatic Animal Program, College of Veterinary Medicine, 2015 SW 16th 
Avenue, Gainesville, FL 32610 [Dr. Ruth Francis-Floyd, Responsible 
Party] has been issued an amendment to scientific research Permit No. 
1054-1731.

ADDRESSES: The amendment and related documents are available for review 
upon written request or by appointment in the following office(s):
    Permits, Conservation and Education Division, Office of Protected 
Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room 13705, Silver Spring, MD 
20910; phone (301) 713-2289; fax (301) 713-0376; and
    Southeast Region, NMFS, 263 13th Avenue South, Saint Petersburg, 
Florida 33701; phone (727) 824-5312; fax (727) 824-5309.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Sloan or Jennifer Skidmore, (301) 
713-2289.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The requested amendment has been granted 
under the authority of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as 
amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.), the regulations governing the taking 
and importing of marine mammals (50 CFR part 216), the Endangered 
Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), the 
regulations governing the taking, importing, and exporting of 
endangered and threatened species (50 CFR 222-226), and the Fur Seal 
Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1151 et seq.).
    This minor amendment extends the expiration date of the permit from 
July 31, 2009 to July 31, 2010. The permit authorizes the Permit Holder 
to receive, import, and export marine mammal and threatened and 
endangered species under NMFS jurisdiction. No takes of live animals 
are authorized by the permit.
    Issuance of this permit, as required by the ESA, was based on a 
finding that such permit: (1) was applied for in good faith; (2) will 
not operate to the disadvantage of endangered species; and (3) is 
consistent with the purposes and policies set forth in section 2 of the 
ESA.

    Dated: July 30, 2009.
P. Michael Payne,
Chief, Permits, Conservation and Education Division, Office of 
Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E9-19292 Filed 8-11-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
Exhibit 32

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned
officers of Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 (the Form 10-Q), of the Company fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 1, 2012

By:

/s/ William J. DoyleWilliam J. Doyle
President and Chief Executive Officer


Date: August 1, 2012

By:

/s/ Wayne R. BrownleeWayne R. Brownlee
Executive Vice President, Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of
Regulation S-K, section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.7322-1 Delivery of seized property to U.S. marshal.

Any forfeitable property which may be seized under the provisions of the Code may, at the option of the assistant regional commissioner (alcohol, tobacco, and firearms) be delivered to the U.S. marshal of the judicial district wherein the property was seized, and remain in the care and custody and under the control of such marshal, pending the disposal thereof as provided by law.

[32 FR 15241, Nov. 3, 1967, as amended by T.D. 7188, 37 FR 12794, June 29, 1972; T.D. ATF-33, 41 FR 44038, Oct. 6, 1976]
#### Shelly Waters *v.*John Greer

*Richard J. Barrett,*in support of the petition.

*Richard E. Rapuano,*assistant attorney general, in opposition.

Submitted May 18

decided May 26, 1964

The petition by the defendant for certification for appeal from the Appellate Division of the Circuit Court is denied.
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.6802-1 Supply and distribution. ( a ) *Postmaster General.* The Commissioner shall furnish to the Postmaster General, without prepayment, a suitable quantity of adhesive stamps (other than the stamps on playing cards), coupons, tickets, or such other devices as may be prescribed pursuant to section 6302(b) (authorizing a discretionary method for collecting certain specified taxes) or chapter 69 of the Code, to be distributed to, and kept on sale by, the various postmasters in the United States in all post offices of the first and second classes, and such post offices of the third and fourth classes as are located in county seats or Postmaster General as necessary.
( b ) *Designated depositary of the United States.* The district director for the district in which any designated depositary of the United States is located shall furnish to such designated depositary, without prepayment, a suitable quantity of adhesive stamps to be kept on sale by the designated depositary.
( c ) *State agents.* Any person who is duly appointed and acting as agent of any State for the sale of stock transfer stamps of such State may make application to the district director for the district in which the State agent is located, to be designated for the purpose of being furnished without prepayment, for sale, stamps to be used in payment of the tax imposed by section 4301. The application shall contain the location and post office address of the State agent, and the maximum amount of stamps he desires to maintain on hand. A copy of the agent's appointment as State agent should be attached to the application.
Named Executive Officer Compensation




 Exhibit 10.5 
 Named Executive Officer Compensation 
 Effective January 1, 2007, the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors (the “Committee”) of Chesapeake Energy Corporation set the 2007 annual base salaries of the named executive officers at $975,000 for Aubrey K. McClendon, $775,000 for Marcus C. Rowland, $775,000 for Steven C. Dixon, $725,000 for
J. Mark Lester and $725,000 for Douglas J. Jacobson. In addition, the Committee awarded cash bonuses to the named executive officers, payable on January 19, 2007, of $830,000 for Aubrey K. McClendon, $550,000 for Marcus C. Rowland, $550,000 for
Steven C. Dixon, $450,000 for J. Mark Lester and $450,000 for Douglas J. Jacobson.
#### § 404.6048-1 [Reserved]
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certainPooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2015, by and among GSMORTGAGE SECURITIES CORPORATION II, as Depositor, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, ADIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, WELLS FARGOBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, SITUS HOLDINGS, LLC asOperating Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as CertificateAdministrator and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, withrespect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-GS1 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.07 of thisAgreement, I, Daniel Marthinsen, Managing Director of Special Servicing dohereby certify that:

 

1.           Areview of the activities of the Special Servicer during the period from January1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.          Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasexecuted this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Marthinsen

DanielMarthinsen

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___ ___________________ _____ No

. 02

- 18

- 00203

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 342nd District Court Ta rrant County, Texas Trial C ourt No. 342

- 295089

- 17

Before Bassel , J. ; Sudderth, C.J.; and Gabriel, J

. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion



### L ESTER 

### J. S TRAIT 

### , Appellant

V



### . S AVANNAH 

### C OURT 

### P ARTNERSHIP 

### ; PSJ P ROPERTIES 

### , L TD



### . ; V. P ATRICK 

### G RAY 

### C U STOM 

### H OMES 

### , I NC



### . ; H OME 

### C REEK 

### , L.L.C. ; JMJ T ORIAN 

### P ROPERTIES 

### , L.L.C. ; C HEATHAM 

### P ART NERS 

### ; T HE 

### C ITY OF 

### S OUTHLAKE 

### , T EXAS 

### ; L AURA 

### H ILL 

### , IN HER 

### O FFICIAL 

### C APACITY AS 

### M AYOR OF THE 

### C ITY OF 

### S OUTHLAKE 

### ; AND 

### S HANA 

### Y ELVERTON 

### , IN HER 

### O FFICIAL 

### C APACITY AS THE 

### C ITY 

### M ANAGER OF THE 

### C ITY OF 

### S OUTHLAKE 

### , Appellees2 MEMOR ANDUM OPINION
T his is an appeal from the trial court ’ s order granting Appellees ’ motions for summary judgment that were ba sed solely on collateral es toppel and res judicata. In

two interrelated iss ues, Appellant Lester J. Strait argues that Appellees ’ summary judgments should be reversed be caus e they were based on the prec lusive eff ect of a prio r judgment that was reversed o n appeal. See Strait v. Savannah Court P ’ ship , 576 S.W.3d 802, 818 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth 2019, pet. denied) ( Strait I )

. A p pellees

con cede that their mot ion s for summar y judgment in the underlying lawsuit ( Strait II )

w ere based on prec lusion doctrines and that this court ’ s reversal of the final judgm ent
in Strait I renders the summary judgment s in the Strait II lawsuit improper. We agree with the parties that this app eal requires reversal. We therefore sustain Strait ’ s iss ue s ,

revers e the trial court ’ s summary judgments, and remand the case to the trial court for
a new trial. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(d); see als o Chase Home Fin

. , LLC v. SFTF Holdings , LLC , No. 02

- 10

- 004 23

- CV, 2011 WL 2756175, at *1 (Tex. A p p.

— F o rt Worth July 14, 2011, no pet. ) (mem. op.) (per curiam) (reversing and remanding after appellee agreed to the relief sought by appellant) ; Smith v. L aw O ffice of Dale A. Burrows , P.C. , No. 02

- 10

- 00112

- CV, 2010 WL 4056229, at *1 (Tex. A pp.

— Fort Worth Oct. 14, 2010, no pet.) (mem. op.) (same).
Per Curiam
Delivered: February 6, 2020
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Encorium Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kai Lindevall, M.D. Ph. D., President and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ Kai Lindevall, M.D. Ph. D.
|Kai Lindevall, M.D. Ph. D.    
|Executive Chairman            
|(Principal Executive Officer) 

November 16, 2009

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             193
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,428
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     10,594
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,287
<PP&E>                                           9,358
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  27,866
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,267
<BONDS>                                          6,995
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         32
<COMMON>                                            62
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,308
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    27,866
<SALES>                                          9,190
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,190
<CGS>                                            5,540
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,540
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,604
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 285
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    761
<INCOME-TAX>                                       274
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                487
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       487
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11
        

</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

 v.

FRANCISCO MISAEL AMAYAPORTILLO, AKA Francisco AmayaPortillo, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 15-10533

D.C. No. 

2:15-cr-00955-SRB-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Susan R. Bolton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 12, 2016** 

San Francisco, California

Before: W. FLETCHER, CHRISTEN, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

After Francisco Amaya-Portillo pleaded guilty to violating 8 U.S.C. §

1326(a), the district court sentenced him to 18-months of imprisonment, followed

FILED

SEP 19 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
by three years of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291,

and affirm the sentence.

Amaya-Portillo’s sole claim on appeal is that the government breached the

plea agreement he had entered into by implicitly arguing for a harsher sentence

than the agreement allowed. We disagree. While the government could have

recommended the agreed-upon sentence more enthusiastically, it had no obligation

to do that. See United States v. Johnson, 187 F.3d 1129, 1135 (9th Cir. 1999).

Here, the government recommended the proper sentence, gave reasons to support

it, and addressed likely objections. This is all the agreement reasonably demanded.

AFFIRMED.

2