alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 49

Expressing the sense of the Congress that any legislation passed by the

Congress relating to assistance for school lunch and breakfast programs

should include a requirement to provide free lunches and breakfasts

to economically disadvantaged students.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 24, 1995

Mr. PAYNE of New Jersey submitted the following concurrent resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that any legislation

passed by the Congress relating to assistance for school

lunch and breakfast programs should include a requirement to provide free lunches and breakfasts to economically disadvantaged students.

Whereas the school lunch and breakfast programs under the

National School Lunch Act and the Child Nutrition Act

of 1966 have proven to be cost effective and instrumental

in improving the health of children and families in the

United States;

Whereas students whose annual family income does not exceed 130 percent of the applicable family size income levels contained in the most recent income poverty guide-
2

•HCON 49 IH

lines prescribed by the Office of Management and Budget

are provided free lunches and breakfasts under these programs; and

Whereas access to nutritious programs such as the school

lunch and breakfast programs make children better able

to learn, and, as a result, these children will be more productive members of society later in life: Now, therefore,

be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that any

3 legislation passed by the Congress relating to assistance

4 for school lunch and school breakfast programs should in5 clude a requirement to provide free lunches and breakfasts

6 to students whose annual family income does not exceed

7 130 percent of the applicable family size income levels con8 tained in the most recent income poverty guidelines pre9 scribed by the Office of Management and Budget and

10 based on data provided by the Bureau of the Census.

Æ
#### § 1.995-6 Taxable income attributable to military property.

(a) *Gross income attributable to military property.* For purposes of section 995(b)(3)(A)(i), the term “gross income which is attributable to military property” includes income from the sale, exchange, lease, or rental of military property (as described in paragraph (c) of this section). The term also includes gross income from the performance of services which are related and subsidiary (as defined in § 1.993-1(d)) to any qualified sale, exchange, lease, or rental of military property. Where gross income cannot be determined on an item by item basis, the gross income with respect to those items not so determinable shall be apportioned. Such apportionment shall be accomplished using appropriate facts and circumstances, so that the gross income apportioned to sale of military property bears a reasonably close factual relationship to the actual gross income earned on such sales. The apportionment shall be based on methods which include the fair market value of property sold or exchanged, the fair rental value of any leaseholds granted, the fair market value of any related or subsidiary services performed in connection with such sale or leases or methods based on gross receipts or costs of goods sold, where appropriate.

(b) *Deductions.* For purposes of section 995(b)(3)(A)(ii), deductions shall be properly allocated and apportioned to gross income, described in paragraph (a) of this section, in accordance with the rules of § 1.861-8. These deductions include all applicable deductions from gross income provided under part VI of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the Code.

(c) *Military property.* For purposes of this section, the term *military property* means any property which is an arm, ammunition, or implement of war designated in the munitions list published pursuant to section 38 of the International Security Assistance and Arms Export Control Act of 1976 (22 U.S.C. 2778 which superseded 22 U.S.C. 1934) and the regulations thereunder (22 CFR 121.01).

(d) *Illustration.* The principles of this section may be illustrated by the following example:

# Example.

X Corporation elects to be a DISC for the first time in 1976. X has taxable income of $50,000, of which $30,000 is attributable to military property and $10,000 to interest on producer's loans. The total deemed distributions with respect to X are as follows:

| (1) Gross interest from Producer's loans in 1976 | $10,000 |
| --- | --- |
| (2) 50 percent of the taxable income of the DISC attributable to military property in 1976 | 15,000 |
| (3) One-half of the excess of taxable income for 1976 over the sum of lines (1) and (2) (1/2 of ($50,000 minus $25,000)) | 12,500 |
| (4) Total deemed distributions (sum of total lines (1), (2), and (3)) | 37,500 |

(Secs. 995(e)(7), (8) and (10), 995(g) and 7805 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (90 Stat. 1655, 26 U.S.C. 995 (e)(7), (8) and (10); 90 Stat. 1659, 26 U.S.C. 995(g); and 68A Stat 917, 26 U.S.C. 7805))

[T.D. 7984, 49 FR 40019, Oct. 12, 1984]
300

350

450

450

400

400

300

400

300

400

400

350

400

400

400

300

350

500

500

450

Corralitos

Airport

83

83

83

83

F M 3 1 6 9

T O B IA S L N

F M 3 1 6 9

S E R G IO

G O N Z A L E Z R A N C H R D

F M 3 1 6 9

V A L L E V E R D E R D

83

83

83

83

F M 3 1 6 9

T O B IA S L N

F M 3 1 6 9

S E R G IO

G O N Z A L E Z R A N C H R D

F M 3 1 6 9

V A L L E V E R D E R D

El Grullo Creek

Las Palo

m

as Cre

e

k

El Grullo Creek

El Grullo Creek

Rio

Grande

Rio Grande

Rio

Grande

Falcon

Reservoir

Falc

o

n

R

eservoir

Arroyo

San

Francisco

El Arroyo

Zo

pilote

Arroyo

Zacatoso

UNITED

STATES

OF AMERICA

ESTADOS

UNIDOS

MEXICANOS

San

Ygnacio

ValleVerde

Colonia

Ramireno

Buoy 36

Buoy 34

Buoy 35

Mecom

Lake Dam

Cementerio

del Pueblo

Uribe

Cemetery

Old

Raotireno

Cemetery

New Ramireno

Cemetery

Zapata NW

Arroyo

Salado

East

Arroyo

Burro

San

Ygnacio

Zapata

Arroyo

Salado

West

FEET

FEET

660 000FEET

MR

MQ

MR

MQ

99°22'30"

07'

25'

30' 25'

27°

30"

27'

27'

22'30"

27°

30'

27° 30"

99°

27°

07'

00'

99° 99°

30"

2'

5'

30"

30" 2'

5'

00'

30"

16 930 000

690 000FEET

16 900000

E 4

29

29

000m

4

4 4

29

4

29

4 4

29

4

000m

000m

29

29

4

4

29

29

29

29

29

4

29

29

4 4

29

29

30

29

000m

29

4

29

4 4

29

4

4

29

30

29

29

4

29

4 4 4 4

29

29

60

88

59

51 55 58

95

53

62

95

87

54 56

90

52

53

89

54

N

60

96

58

00

97

98

00

90

98

88

E

99 99

89

56

N

59

91

96

93 93

57 62

92

61

55

87

61

94 94

57

92

91

52

97

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

TEXAS

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

TX 2799-122

SAN YGNACIO, TX-TAM

2010

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Interstate Route US Route State Route

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

SAN YGNACIO QUADRANGLE

TEXAS-TAMAULIPAS

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Zone 14R

Imagery......................................................NAIP, April 2008

Roads.....................................US Census Bureau TIGER data

with limited USGS updates, 2008

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2008

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 1995

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2008

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator,

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Texas Coordinate System of 1983

(south zone)

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is also draft version 0.5.10

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0 1

MILES

MN

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

GN

UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 12 ́

4 MILS

5° 37 ́

100 MILS

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

14R

MQ

MR 30 00

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 151 (Friday, August 7, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39710-39711]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19009]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

[FWS-R9-FHC-2009-N156; 94300-1122-0000-Z2]


Wind Turbine Guidelines Advisory Committee; Announcement of 
Public Meeting

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), will host a 
Wind Turbine Guidelines Advisory Committee (Committee) meeting 
September 1-3, 2009. The meeting is open to the public. The meeting 
agenda will include reports from the Legal and Synthesis Subcommittees, 
and discussion of the current draft Recommendations to the Secretary.

DATES: The meeting is scheduled for September 1-3, 2009. The sessions 
will be 8 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. September 1-2, and 8 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. 
September 3.

ADDRESSES: We will hold the meeting at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service, 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, Rooms 200A & B, Arlington, Virginia, 
22203. For more information, see ``Meeting Location Information.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rachel London, Division of Habitat and 
Resource Conservation, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, (703) 358-2161.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On October 24, 2007, the Secretary of the Interior (Secretary) 
established the Committee to provide advice and recommendations to the 
Secretary on developing effective measures to avoid or minimize impacts 
to wildlife and their habitats related to land-based wind energy 
facilities. The Committee is made up of 22 members representing the 
varied interests associated with wind energy development and its 
potential impacts to wildlife species and their habitats. All Committee 
meetings are open to the public.

[[Page 39711]]

Meeting Location Information

    Please note that the meeting location is accessible to wheelchair 
users. If you require additional accommodations, please notify us at 
least 2 weeks in advance of the meeting.
    Persons planning to attend the meeting must register at http://www.fws.gov/habitatconservation/windpower/wind_turbine_advisory_committee.html, by August 26, 2009. Seating is limited due to room 
capacity. We will give preference to registrants based on date and time 
of registration. Limited standing room will be available if all seats 
are filled.

    Dated: August 4, 2009.
Rachel London,
Alternate Designated Federal Officer, Wind Turbine Guidelines Advisory 
Committee.
[FR Doc. E9-19009 Filed 8-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          368621
<SECURITIES>                                    328416
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         3668621
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4365658
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     4133208
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4365658
<SALES>                                        6381915
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1319757
<CGS>                                          4592181
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5065535
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 26120
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                4985
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1166853
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1166853
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1166853
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   183.78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   183.78
        

</TABLE>
39622.

#### LESTER v. LUTTRELL.

Decided September 5, 1962

Rehearing denied September 21, 1962.

*575
      *Marson G. Dunaway, Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*Robert Edward Surtes,*contra.

Bkll, Judge.

When an attachment is returnable to the superior or county court, the plaintiff shall file his declaration at the first term. Code § 8-601. It is undisputed that no declaration was filed in this case after the attachment. However, the plaintiff contends that his petition for attachment was equivalent to a declaration, and even though it was defective, the defect was amendable and the judgment cured the defect. *Code*§ 110-702.

In *Mehring v. Charles,*58 Ga. 377, the Supreme Court held that the seizure of the defendant’s property by process of attachment will give the court jurisdiction to enable the plaintiff to file his declaration against the defendant provided the plaintiff alleges in the declaration that the defendant’s property has been attached and “. . . instead of praying process against the defendant, pray that the court will render a judgment that the property levied on may be sold in satisfaction of his demand.” Ibid., p. 379. It appears that at least some reference to the previous attachment is requisite for a good or an amendable declaration. *West v. Gainesville Nat. Bank,*32 Ga. App. 703, 707 (124 SE 733). See also *Kolb v. Cheney,*63 Ga. 688, 691; and *Wilson v. Stricker & Co.*66 Ga. 575 (2,4) 578.

*576Viewed in the light of the above authorities, the petition in the present action is not sufficient to constitute a declaration in attachment as required by *Code*§ 8-601. The defects inherent in the petition were not curable by the judgment. Anything to the contrary in *Smith v. Jacksonville Oil Mill Co.,*21 Ga. App. 679 (94 SE 900), must yield to the Supreme Court cases of *Kolb*and *Wilson,*supra.

Furthermore, the record reveals that there was no return of the writ of attachment. The return by the officer of the attachment writ is the foundation of the court’s jurisdiction in all subsequent proceedings against the property attached. *McReynolds v. Colclough,*146 Ga. 696 (3) (92 SE 206); *Chastain v. Alford,*193 Ga. 551, 552 (19 SE2d 721).

The affidavit to the writ for the attachment was made before the clerk of the superior court and not before' a judicial officer as required by *Code*§ 8-109. If the attachment had been otherwise valid, for this reason it was absolutely void. *Heard v. National Bank of Illinois,*114 Ga. 291 (2) (40 SE 266). Also see *Worley Bros. Granite Co. v. Haskins,*105 Ga. App. 444, 448 (124 SE2d 663).

The trial court properly arrested the judgment and dismissed the attachment.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Felton, C. J., and Hall, J., concur.*
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

** **

** **

Reference is hereby made to that certain Trustand Servicing Agreement dated as of August 17, 2016, by and among BANC OFAMERICA MERRILL LYNCH LARGE LOAN, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Servicer, AEGON USA REALTY ADVISORS, LLC, as SpecialServicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administratorand Custodian, and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, withrespect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-ISQR (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 13.7 of thisAgreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Servicesdo hereby certify that:

 

1.      Areview of the activities of the Servicer during the period from Janauary, 2018through December 31, 2018, the (“Reporting Period”) and of its performance perthe Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2.      To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer, has fulfilled all ofits obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasexecuted this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/LeslieHayton 

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
EX-4.37 Addendum No. 1/Crown Wind Limited



 





Exhibit 4.37


[Confidential Treatment]



Addendum No. 1 to the bareboat charter dated 20 April 2004 between NCL (Bahamas) Ltd. as
charterers and Crown Wind Limited as owners in relation to the vessel named “MV Norwegian Wind”
(the “Charter”)





	1.	 	The parties have agreed that the Charter Period set out in box 21 of the Charter shall
be amended to read “The Vessel shall be redelivered between [**] [Confidential Treatment]
”.






	2.	 	Save as expressly provided by this Addendum No. 1, all other terms and conditions of
the Charter shall remain unamended and in full force and effect.





Mark E.
Warren
                                                            




For and on behalf of NCL (Bahamas) Ltd.




Date:
28 November 2006




Signature
Illegible
                                                            

For and on behalf of Crown Wind Limited




Date:
28 November 2006
§ 31.3406(a)-3 Scope and extent of accounts subject to backup withholding. A payor who is required to withhold under § 31.3406(a)-1 must withhold— ( a ) On the accounts subject to withholding under § 31.3406(a)-1 (b)(1)(i) or (b)(2)(ii); and
( b ) On the accounts subject to withholding under § 31.3406(a)-1(b)(1)(ii) or (b)(2)(i), as described under § 31.3406(d)-5 (relating to notification of incorrect TIN) or § 31.3406(c)-1 (relating to notified payee underreporting), respectively.
[T.D. 8637, 60 FR 66114, Dec. 21, 1995]
#### § 1.9004-5 Terms; applicability of other laws.

All other terms which are not otherwise specifically defined shall have the same meaning as when used in the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (or the corresponding provisions of prior law) except where otherwise distinctly expressed or manifestly intended to the contrary. Further, all provisions of law contained in the Code (or the corresponding provisions of prior law) shall apply to the extent that they can apply. Thus, all the provisions of subtitle F of the Code (and the corresponding provisions of prior law) shall apply to the extent they can apply, including the provisions of law relating to assessment, collection, credit or refund, and limitations. For purposes of this section and §§ 1.9004-1 to 1.9004-4, inclusive, the term “Act” means the Act of September 26, 1961 (Pub. L. 87-312, 75 Stat. 674).

(75 Stat. 674, 26 U.S.C. 613 note)

[T.D. 6575, 26 FR 9633, Oct. 12, 1961]

QUARTZITE AND CLAY USED IN PRODUCTION OF REFRACTORY PRODUCTS; ELECTION FOR PRIOR TAXABLE YEARS
Exhibit 10.23


FRIENDLY ICE CREAM CORPORATION


BOARD OF
DIRECTORS COMPENSATION


The
non-employee directors of the Company  are compensated through a
combination of cash and equity-based compensation.


The
following is a summary of the cash compensation paid to the Company’s
non-employee directors.


	
  A.  Annual Retainer

  	
   

  	
  Directors

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  30,000

  	
   

  
	
  

  	
   

  	
  Chairman

  	
   

  	
  Additional

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  100,000

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  B.  Regularly Scheduled Board of 

  Directors 

  Meetings

  	
   

  	
  Directors

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  1,500

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  C.  Regularly Scheduled 

  Committee 

  Meetings

  	
   

  	
  Members

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  1,000

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  D.  Special 

  Teleconference 

  Meetings

  	
   

  	
  Directors

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  750

  	
   

  



 






A.           
Each director, including the Chairman, of the Company
receives a fee of $2,500 per month. 

Mr. Donald Smith receives additional compensation of $8,333.34 per month for
serving as Chairman of the Board.


B.           
Each director of the Company receives $1,500, plus expenses,
for each regularly scheduled meeting of the Board of Directors attended.


C.           
Each member of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee
and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receives a fee of $1,000,
plus expenses, for each regularly scheduled committee meeting attended. Each
member of the Audit Committee receives a fee of $1,500, plus expenses, for
attendance at the annual Audit Committee meeting.


D.           
Each director receives a fee of $750 for participating in
special teleconference meetings.


In addition to cash
compensation, on annual basis, the non-employee directors are awarded stock
options and/or restricted stock units under the Company’s equity incentive
plans.
#### § 1.857-10 Information returns.

Nothing in §§ 1.857-8 and 1.857-9 shall be construed to relieve a real estate investment trust or its shareholders from the duty of filing information returns required by regulations prescribed under the provisions of subchapter A, chapter 61 of the Code.

(Sec. 856(d)(4) (90 Stat. 1750; 26 U.S.C. 856(d)(4)); sec. 856(e)(5) (88 Stat. 2113; 26 U.S.C. 856(e)(5)); sec. 856(f)(2) (90 Stat. 1751; 26 U.S.C. (856(f)(2)); sec. 856(g)(2) (90 Stat. 1753; 26 U.S.C. 856(g)(2)); sec. 858(a) (74 Stat. 1008; 26 U.S.C. 858(a)); sec. 859(c) (90 Stat. 1743; 26 U.S.C. 859(c)); sec. 859(e) (90 Stat. 1744; 26 U.S.C. 859(e)); sec. 6001 (68A Stat. 731; 26 U.S.C. 6001); sec. 6011 (68A Stat. 732; 26 U.S.C. 6011); sec. 6071 (68A Stat. 749, 26 U.S.C. 6071); sec. 6091 (68A Stat. 752; 26 U.S.C. 6091); sec. 7805 (68A Stat. 917; 26 U.S.C. 7805), Internal Revenue Code of 1954))

[T.D. 6598, 27 FR 4089, Apr. 28, 1962. Redesignated and amended by T.D. 7767, 46 FR 11277, 11279, Feb. 6, 1981]