alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Covalent Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lawrence R. Hoffman, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Lawrence R. Hoffman                                                 
|Lawrence R. Hoffman Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



November 15, 2004



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes
 Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
## IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

May 17, 2024 SC-2023-0549 Sherman Dallas, Tanyanita Dallas, Chadrick Dallas, Glenda Freeman, and Louis Freeman v. Nicole Hicks, as administrator of the Estate ofWillie Louis Hicks, deceased (Appeal from Tallapoosa Circuit Court: CV21-900031). CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT WHEREAS, the ruling on the application for rehearing filed in this case and indicated below was entered in this cause on May 17, 2024: APPLICATION OVERRULED. NO OPINION. Mitchell, J. -- Parker, C.J., and Shaw, Bryan, and Mendheim, JJ., concur. WHEREAS, the appeal in the above referenced cause has been duly submitted and considered by the Supreme Court of Alabama and the judgment indicated below was entered in this cause on March 22, 2024: AFFIRMED. Mitchell, J. -- Parker, C.J., and Shaw, J., concur. Bryan and Mendheim, JJ., concur in the result. NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Rule 41, Ala. R. App. P., IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this Court's judgment in this cause is certified on this date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise ordered by this Court or agreed upon by the parties, the costs of this cause are hereby taxed as provided by Rule 35, Ala. R. App. P.

I, Megan B. Rhodebeck, certify that this is the record of the judgment of the Court, witness my hand and seal.

Clerk, Supreme Court of Alabama
Exhibit 10.1 - Executive Officer Compensation

         The Temecula Valley Bank ("Bank") Board of Directors, upon the
recommendation of the Executive Officer Compensation Committee, approved 2006
bonuses for certain executive officers who participate in the discretionary
executive bonus pool and whose bonuses are not subject to predetermined
formulas, as follows: Scott J. Word -- $100,000; Donald L. Schempp -- $50,000;
and Martin E. Plourd -- $35,000.
H. Con. Res. 229 Agreed to September 28, 1996

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

Concurrent Resolution

Directing the Secretary of the Senate to make corrections in the enrollment of

S. 1004.

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That, in the enrollment of the bill S. 1004, the Secretary

of the Senate shall make the following corrections:

(1) In section 1106(c), in the text added to section 5 of

the Act of January 2, 1951—

(A) strike ‘‘This section does not prohibit, nor may

any State make’’ and insert in lieu thereof ‘‘With respect

to a vessel operating in Alaska, this section does not

prohibit, nor may the State of Alaska make’’;

(B) strike ‘‘except that a State may’’ and insert in

lieu thereof ‘‘except that such State may’’; and

(C) strike paragraph (2) and insert in lieu thereof

the following:

‘‘(2) A voyage referred to in paragraph (1) is a voyage that—

‘‘(A) includes a stop in Canada or in a State other than

the State of Alaska;

‘‘(B) includes stops in at least 2 different ports situated

in the State of Alaska; and

‘‘(C) is of at least 60 hours duration.’’.
H. Con. Res. 229—2

(2) In section 1113(d), in the text added to section 12106

of title 46, United States Code, in subsection (e)(1)(E) strike

‘‘section 12102’’ and insert in lieu thereof ‘‘this section’’.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
Unassociated Document


    

      Exhibit
        10.2


    

    AMENDMENT
      TO CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT

     

    Amendment
      Agreement made this 18th
      day of
      July 2006 by and between Harvey F. Milman (“Executive”) and Drew Industries
      Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”). 

     

    WHEREAS,
      Executive has been Vice President-Chief Legal Officer of the Company;
      and

     

    WHEREAS,
      the Company and Executive entered into a Change In Control Agreement effective
      as of March 1, 2005 (the “Agreement”), and wish to amend the Agreement as
      expressly provided herein in order to conform the Agreement to other Change
      in
      Control Agreements subsequently entered into by the Company, 

     

    NOW,
      THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and for other good and valuable
      consideration the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, it is hereby agreed
      as follows:

     

    	1.  	
            AMENDMENT

          


     

    1.1 Section
      5.1 is hereby amended by adding to the end of the second sentence the
      following:

     

    “and
      fifteen (15) miles from the Company’s location on the date hereof.”

     

    1.2 Section
      6.1 is hereby amended by deleting the last sentence and adding in lieu thereof
      the following sentence:

     

    “Such
      payments shall commence on the next payroll payment date following the
      Qualifying Termination.”

     

    1.3 Section
      6.3 is hereby amended by adding in the second sentence after the phrase “...three
      (3) year period...” the following:

     

    “(or
      such
      shorter period as Executive has been employed by the Company)”

     

    	2.  	
            NO
              OTHER CHANGES

          


     

    Except
      as
      set forth in this Amendment Agreement, all terms, provisions, conditions and
      restrictions contained in the Agreement shall remain in full force and
      effect.

     

    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Executive have executed this Amendment
      Agreement the day and year first mentioned above.

     

    DREW
      INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED

    


    By:
      /s/Leigh J. Abrams  

    


    Name:
      Leigh
      J. Abrams

    Title:
      President and Chief Executive Officer

     

    /s/Harvey
      F. Milman

     

    Harvey
      F.
      Milman
§ 1.528-6 Expenditure test. ( a ) *In general.* An organization cannot qualify as a homeowners association under section 528 for a taxable year unless 90 percent or more of its expenditures for such taxable year are qualifying expenditures as defined in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section. The determination of whether an organization meets the provisions of this section shall be made after the close of the organization's taxable year. Investments or transfers of funds to be held to meet future costs shall not be taken into account as expenditures. For example, transfers to a sinking fund account for the replacement of a roof would not be considered an expenditure for the purposes of this section even if the roof is association property. In addition, excess assessments which are either rebated to members or applied against the members' following year's assessments will not be considered an expenditure for the purposes of this section.
( b ) *Qualifying expenditures.* Qualifying expenditures are expenditures by an organization for the acquisition, construction, management, maintenance, and care of the organization's association property. They include both current operating and capital expenditures on association property. Qualifying expenditures include expenditures on association property despite the fact that such property may produce income which is not exempt function income. Thus expenditures on a swimming pool are qualifying expenditures despite the fact that fees from guests of members using the pool are not exempt function income. Where expenditures by an organization are used both for association property as well as other property, an allocation shall be made between the two uses on a reasonable basis. Only that portion of the expenditures which is properly allocable to the acquisition, construction, management, maintenance or care of association property, shall constitute qualifying expenditures.
( c ) *Examples of qualifying expenditures.* Qualifying expenditures may include (but are not limited to) expenditures for: ( 1 ) Salaries of an association manager and secretary;
( 2 ) Paving of streets;
( 3 ) Street signs;
( 4 ) Security personnel;
( 5 ) Legal fees;
( 6 ) Upkeep of tennis courts;
( 7 ) Swimming pools;
( 8 ) Recreation rooms and halls;
( 9 ) Replacement of common buildings, facilities, air conditioning, etc;
( 10 ) Insurance premiums on association property;
( 11 ) Accountant's fees;
( 12 ) Improvement of private property to the extent it is association property; and
( 13 ) Real estate and personal property taxes imposed on association property by a State or local government.
[T.D. 7692, 45 FR 26322, Apr. 18, 1980]
Exhibit
        32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Properties III
        L.P.
        (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 29, 2005 as filed with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
        Neal Ludeke, Chief Financial Officer of Richman Housing Credits Inc., general
        partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties III L.P., general partner of the
        Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant
        to (S)
        906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
  (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Registrant.
  
  /s/
        Neal Ludeke
 Neal
        Ludeke
 Chief
        Financial Officer of Richman
 Housing
        Credits Inc., general partner
 of
        Richman Tax Credit Properties III
 L.P.,
        General Partner of the Registrant
 August
        15, 2005
   20
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 207 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 207

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 2, 1996

    Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
     Approving certain regulations to implement provisions of the 
 Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 relating to labor-management 
 relations with respect to covered employees, other than employees of 
the House of Representatives and employees of the Senate, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. APPROVAL OF REGULATIONS.

    (a) In General.--The regulations described in subsection (b) are 
hereby approved, insofar as such regula- 
tions apply to covered employees under the Congressional Accountability 
Act of 1995 (other than employees of the House of Representatives and 
employees of the Senate) and to the extent such regulations are 
consistent with the provisions of such Act.
    (b) Regulations Approved.--The regulations referred to in 
subsection (a) are the regulations issued by the Office of Compliance 
on July 9, 1996, under section 220(d) of the Congressional 
Accountability Act of 1995 to implement section 220 of such Act 
(relating to the application of chapter 71 of title 5, United States 
Code), as published in the Congressional Record on July 11, 1996 
(Volume 142, daily edition), beginning on page H7454.

SEC. 2. ADOPTION OF REGULATIONS RELATING TO HEARING OFFICERS.

    The Board of Directors of the Office of Compliance shall adopt 
regulations (in accordance with section 304 of the Congressional 
Accountability Act of 1995) to implement the requirement that the Board 
refer any matter under section 220(c)(1) of such Act which relates to 
covered employees (other than employees of the House of Representatives 
and employees of the Senate) to a hearing officer.

            Passed the House of Representatives August 2, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.

                              By Linda Nave,

                                                          Deputy Clerk.
```
Employment Letter Agreement between NewPage Corp. and Daniel A. Clark



 EXHIBIT 10.12 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 TO 
 EMPLOYMENT LETTER AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment No. 1 is made effective as of January 28, 2007, and modifies and amends the Employment Letter Agreement dated May 2, 2005 (“Agreement”) between NewPage Corporation
(“Company”) and Daniel A. Clark (“Executive”). Terms defined in the Agreement have the same meaning when used in this Amendment unless otherwise indicated. For good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged, Company and Executive agree as follows: 
  

	1.	Section 2(c) of the Agreement is amended in its entirety to read as follows: 

 “(c) Annual Bonus. For performance periods during the Term, Executive will be entitled to participate in the NewPage Corporation management incentive or bonus plan or plans approved annually by the Board
of Directors of the Company (the “Annual Incentive Plan”). Executive’s target bonus will be 45% of Base Salary for achieving targets set annually pursuant to the terms the Annual Incentive Plan. Each annual bonus (“Annual
Bonus”) will be paid on or before March 15th of the year following the tax year in which the relevant services required for payment have been performed. There will be no cap on the amount of any Annual Bonus.” 
  

	2.	Except as modified by this Amendment, the Agreement remains in full force and effect. 

  


					
	Company:	 	Executive:
	NewPage Corporation	 	
			
	By:	 	 /s/ Mark A. Suwyn
	 	 /s/ Daniel A. Clark

		 		 	Daniel A. Clark
	Title:	 	Chairman and CEO
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as Amended





Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted), Bing Yeh, the President and Chief Executive
Officer of Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies
that, to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005,
to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the "Periodic
Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the
9th day of August, 2005.





/s/ Bing Yeh Bing Yeh 
President and Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, has been provided to Silicon
Storage Technology, Inc. and will be retained by Silicon Storage Technology,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not
deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
Modification to Stock Option Agreement



 Exhibit 10.4 
 FIRST MODIFICATION AGREEMENT OF STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT 
 RELATING TO CHARITABLE PLEDGE BY EXECUTIVE

 THIS FIRST MODIFICATION AGREEMENT, dated as of June 29, 2006, by and between SUN ENERGY SOLAR, INC., a Delaware corporation formerly
known as Sologic, Inc. (the “Company”), and CARL L. SMITH, III (“Executive”). 
 Recitals 
 A. The Company and Executive are parties to that certain Stock Option Agreement, dated as of December 21, 2005 (the “Stock Option
Agreement”). 
 B. The Company and Executive desire to modify certain provisions of the Stock Option Agreement relating to the
assignment provisions to Executive, subject to and in accordance with the terms set forth in this First Modification Agreement. 
 Agreement

 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these premises, the mutual covenants and agreements of the parties hereunder, and for other good and
valuable consideration the sufficiency and receipt of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows; 
 1. Pledge
by Executive. Executive has agreed to pledge 25% of all his rights under the Stock Option agreement to appropriate charitable foundation(s) of his own choosing. 
 2. Modification of Provision 5 of Stick Option Agreement titled No Assignment. It has been deemed that such a provision may affect Executive’s ability to implement such a pledge, therefore, the aspects limiting
the assignability of this provision are now and forever removed from the agreement. 
 3. Stock Option Agreement Remains in Effect. Except as
expressly modified by this Agreement, the Stock Option Agreement remains in full force and effect. 
 4. Governing Law. This Agreement
shall in all respects be construed according to the laws of the State of Florida, including its conflict of laws principles. 
 5.
Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which may be executed by less than all of the parties to this Agreement, each of which shall be enforceable against the parties actually executing such counterparts,
and all of which together shall constitute one instrument 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the
date first above written. 
 [Signatures on following page.] 








					
	COMPANY:
	
	SUN ENERGY SOLAR, INC.
			
	By:	 	/s/ Richard C. Hall	 	[SEAL]
		 	 Richard C. Hall
 President
	 	
	
	EXECUTIVE
		
	/s/ Carl L. Smith III	 	[SEAL]
	Carl L. Smith III
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.7454-1 Burden of proof in fraud and transferee cases.

In any proceeding involving the issue whether the petitioner has been guilty of fraud with intent to evade tax, the burden of proof in respect of such issue shall be upon the Commissioner.
§ 1.544-1 Constructive ownership. ( a ) Rules relating to the constructive ownership of stock are provided by section 544 for the purpose of determining whether the stock ownership requirements of the following sections are satisfied: ( 1 ) Section 542(a)(2), relating to ownership of stock by five or fewer individuals.
( 2 ) Section 543(a)(5), relating to personal holding company income derived from personal service contracts.
( 3 ) Section 543(a)(6), relating to personal holding company income derived from property used by shareholders.
( 4 ) Section 543(a)(9), relating to personal holding company income derived from copyright royalties.
( b ) Section 544 provides four general rules with respect to constructive ownership. These rules are: ( 1 ) Constructive ownership by reason of indirect ownership. See section 544(a)(1) and § 1.544-2.
( 2 ) Constructive ownership by reason of family and partnership ownership. See section 544(a) (2), (4), (5), and (6), and §§ 1.544-3, 1.544-6, and 1.544-7.
( 3 ) Constructive ownership by reason of ownership of options. See section 544(a) (3), (4), (5), and (6), and §§ 1.544-4, 1.544-6, and 1.544-7.
( 4 ) Constructive ownership by reason of ownership of convertible securities. See section 544(b) and § 1.544-5. Each of the rules referred to in subparagraphs (2), (3), and (4) of this paragraph is applicable only if it has the effect of satisfying the stock ownership requirement of the section to which applicable; that is, when applied to section 542(a)(2), its effect is to make the corporation a personal holding company, or when applied to section 543(a)(5), section 543(a)(6), or section 543(a)(9), its effect is to make the amounts described in such provisions includible as personal holding company income.
( c ) All forms and classes of stock, however denominated, which represent the interests of shareholders, members, or beneficiaries in the corporation shall be taken into consideration in applying the constructive ownership rules of section 544.
( d ) For rules applicable in treating constructive ownership, determined by one application of section 544, as actual ownership for purposes of a second application of section 544, see section 544(a)(5) and § 1.544-6.
[T.D. 6500, 25 FR 11737, Nov. 26, 1960, as amended by T.D. 6739, 29 FR 7715, June 17, 1964]