alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Properties III L.P.
(the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 30, 2010 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, James Hussey, Chief Financial Officer of Richman Housing Credits Inc.,
general partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties III L.P., general partner of
the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.




/s/James HusseyJames
      HusseyChief
      Financial Officer of RichmanHousing
      Credits Inc., general partnerof
      Richman Tax Credit Properties IIIL.P.,
      General Partner of the RegistrantFebruary
      11, 2011
#### § 20.6321-1 Lien for taxes.

For regulations concerning the lien for taxes, see § 301.6321-1 of this chapter (Regulations on Procedure and Administration).

[T.D. 7710, 45 FR 50747, July 31, 1980]
# Gazzetta ufficiale C 301A/12 d

| | ISSN 1725-2466 |
| --- | --- |
| Gazzetta ufficiale
  dell’Unione europea | C 301A |
| | |
| Edizione in lingua italiana | Comunicazioni e informazioni | 49o anno12 dicembre 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2466

Gazzetta ufficiale

dell’Unione europea

C 301A

Edizione in lingua italiana

Comunicazioni e informazioni

49o anno12 dicembre 2006

---

| Numero d'informazione | Sommario | pagina |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Informazioni |
| | Commissione |
| 2006/C 301A/1 | Ufficio comunitario delle varietà vegetali — Invito a manifestare interesse alla nomina come presidente della commissione di ricorso e relativo supplente | 1 |

Numero d'informazione

Sommario

pagina

III   Informazioni

Commissione

2006/C 301A/1

Ufficio comunitario delle varietà vegetali — Invito a manifestare interesse alla nomina come presidente della commissione di ricorso e relativo supplente

1

| IT | |
| --- | --- |

IT

---

III Informazioni

Commissione

| 12.12.2006 | IT | Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea | CA 301/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2006

IT

Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea

CA 301/1

---

UFFICIO COMUNITARIO DELLE VARIETÀ VEGETALI

Invito a manifestare interesse alla nomina come presidente della commissione di ricorso e relativo supplente

(2006/C 301 A/01)

L’Ufficio comunitario delle varietà vegetali intende nominare il presidente della sua commissione di ricorso e il relativo supplente.

I candidati devono essere cittadini di uno degli Stati membri dell’Unione europea.

Il presidente ed il suo supplente sono nominati dal Consiglio in base ad un elenco di candidati proposto dalla Commissione, previo parere del consiglio di amministrazione dell’Ufficio. Informazioni sulla retribuzione sono ottenibili su richiesta presso il segretariato della commissione di ricorso (Ufficio comunitario delle varietà vegetali, 3, boulevard Maréchal-Foch, BP 10121, F-49101 Angers Cedex 02). L’Ufficio comunitario delle varietà vegetali e la Commissione applicano una politica di pari opportunità.

La descrizione delle mansioni, i moduli per la presentazione delle candidature e le istruzioni per l’invio di tali moduli sono disponibili su Internet ai seguenti indirizzi:

http://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/propertyrights/index_it.htm

e

http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm

Il termine fissato per la ricezione delle candidature è il 31 gennaio 2007 (per informazioni più dettagliate si rimanda alle istruzioni per la presentazione delle candidature).

---
NO T REC OM M EN DE D F OR F UL L- TEX T P UB LIC AT ION File Na me: 09a0102n.06 Filed: F ebrua

ry 6, 2009 No. 08-1572 U N IT E D S T A T E S C O U R T O F A P P E A LS F O R T H E S IX T H C IR C U IT D EA LER C O M PU T ER S ER VI CE S , I NC ., F . K . A . F OR D D EA LER C O M PU T ER S ER VI CE S , I NC . Plain tif f- Ap pe lla nt, On Appea l from the v. United States District Court for the Easter n District of Michig an F OX V AL L EY F O RD Defendant-

Appellee
.

______________________________ B e fo re : KEN

NE DY , M AR TI

N, and CO L E, Cir c uit

Judg e s. P ER CURIAM . Dea ler Computer Servic es, Inc. (“ Dea ler Computer” ) appe als the district court’s or der de nying its motion to vacate an ar bitration awa

rd per mitti ng Fox Va l l ey Ford (“F ox Valley”) to pr ocee d by class arbitration of its c ontrac t c laims w ith other car deale rships. De al er Computer sold and provided r epair for computer hardw are and softwar e to ca r dea lerships ac ross the
c ountr y . F ox Va lle y wa s amon g su c h de a le rs hip s. De a le r Com pute r u se d b oil e rp late c on tr a c ts w ith Fox Valley

and the other

car deale rships. On November 18, 2008, afte r the pa rties filed their br iefs in this appea l, this C ourt in Dealer Com pu te r S e rv s. , Inc. v. Du b H

e rri ng Fo rd , 5 47 F .3 d 5 58 (6 th C ir . 2 00 8) , d e c ide d a c a se that is vir tua lly ide nti c a l to the c a se be fo re us . D e a le r C omp ute r wa s the pla int if f- a pp e lla nt i n b oth c a se s. The c ontrac ts in both case s have ide ntical ar bitration clauses. The proce dural posture is the same. E v en t h e att orney s are the same. In Du b H e rri ng Fo rd , w e h e l d

th a tw e l a c k e d

j ur i s d i c t i o nto consider D eale r Computer’s motion to v ac ate the a rbitration awa

rd for its lack of ripe ness. Id. at55 9. Th e arb itr atio n p ane l ha d n ot ye t c e rt if ie d th e c ar deale rs hip s’ c la ims fo r c la ss a rb itr a tio n; i t
me re ly de c ide d th at th e a

rb itr atio n c la

us e s in De a le r C omp ute r’ s c on tr a c ts did no t pr e c lud e c la ss arbitration. The status of the a rbitration awa

rd is the same he re. The Du b H e rri ng Fo rd court noted that the ca

r dea lerships may

ultimately

fail t o s ec u re cl as s cer

tification for the ir claims and if that
occur s, the appe llant will not be harmed. Id. a t 561- 62 . Fu rt he rm or e , if

the c ar d e a le rs hip s o bta in
c la ss c e rt if

ic atio n, the a

pp e lla nt c an s til l ob ta in j ud ic ia l r e vie w b e fo re com mence me nt o f c la ss arbitration and resolution of the mer its. Id. at 562-63. Fo l l o wi n g Du b H

e rri ng Fo rd , we VA CATE the order of the di strict court and REMAND the
case to the district court with instructions to DI SMI SS for lack of jurisdiction.
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.6673-1 Damages assessable for instituting proceedings before the Tax Court merely for delay.

Any damages awarded to the United States by the Tax Court under section 6673 against a taxpayer for instituting proceedings before the Tax Court merely for delay shall be assessed at the same time at the deficiency and shall be paid upon notice and demand from the district director or the director of the regional service center and shall be collected as a part of the tax.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Daryl Barnes and Demeatrice Goff v. National Housing Development 

Corporation, Colony LLC

Appellate case number: 01-15-00060-CV

Trial court case number: 2012-34954

Trial court: 129th District Court of Harris County

Appellant’s Emergency Motion Requesting Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Brief 

is DISMISSED AS MOOT. The record in this case is not complete, therefore appellant’s brief 

is not yet due.

Appellant was sent a notification on March 3, 2015, that a deadline of April 2, 2015 is in 

place to either make arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record or establish indigence by that 

date, or the Court may require you to file a brief and we may decide your case on issues or points 

that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c). 

We note that appellant attempted to file an affidavit of indigence on February 8, 2015, 

however that document is dated June 7, 2012, and is therefore not timely in accordance with 

TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(c) (stating that the prior filing of an affidavit of indigence in the trial court 

pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 145 does not meet the requirements of this rule). Any 

affidavit of indigence must be current under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1(c).

We further note that the deadline has passed for paying the $195.00 appellate filing fee. 

If the fee is not paid on or before April 2, 2015, or appellant has not established indigence by that 

date, this appeal may be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

X Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: March 19, 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,140,714
<SECURITIES>                                 1,971,176
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,407,028
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,492,090
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          288,384
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,716,736
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,492,090
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               153,317
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               449,456
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,285,675)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,285,675)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,285,675)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (60.78)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (60.78)<F1>
<FN>
<F1>EPS IS NET LOSS PER $1,000 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP UNIT.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO

. 09

- 1 2

- 00 287

- C R



### ____________________

CHRISTOPHER GROZE

, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On A ppeal from the 356th District Court

Hardin County, Texas

Trial Cause No

. 18568

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Christopher Groze pleaded guilty under a plea agreement to aggravated

robbery. The trial court found the evidence substantiated his guilt , but deferred

further proceedings and placed him on community supervision for five years. The

State subseq uently filed a motion to revok e and appellant pleaded “true” to various

violations of the community supervision order. The trial court found appellant

violated these conditions, adjudicated him guilty of aggravated robbery, and

assessed punishment at twenty

- two years of confinement. Ap pellate counsel filed a2 brief that presents counsel’s professional evaluation of the record. Counsel

concludes there are no arguable points of error. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S.

738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1978). This Court granted an extension of time for appellant to file a

pro se response. We received no response from the appellant. We have reviewed

the appellate record and agree with counsel’s conclusion. It is unnecessary to order

a ppointment of new counsel to re

- brief the appeal. Compare Stafford v. State , 813

S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). The trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

________________________________ DAVID GAULTNEY

Justice

Submitted on March 5, 2013

Opinion Delivered March 27, 2013

D o Not Publish

Before Gaultney, Kreger, and Horton, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Amended

Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted), James B. Boyd, the Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of
his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the
Periodic Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 17th day of August, 2009.



|                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    JAMES. B BOYD                                      
|James B. Boyd                                             
|Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, has been provided to Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. and will be retained by Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to
be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.
Fw: please forward to Cortney Bill Maxwell to: Cortney_Higgins 02/23/2011 05:58 PM Cc: RobertJ Wayland, Ron Evans

Cortney --

As requested during today's meeting.

Thanks.

Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt

Bill Maxwell Energy Strategies Group Sector Policies and Programs Division
U.S. EPA Mail Code D243-01
109 T.W. Alexander Drive Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5430
FAX: 919-541-5450

----- Forwarded by Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/23/2011 05:57 PM ----- From: Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Larry Sorrels/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Jim DeMocker/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Rob Brenner/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 02/23/2011 04:10 PM Subject: please forward to Cortney

Bob, during the call just now Amanda Lee asked about documentation for changes in the EMPAX model to reflect the benefits side. Here is a copy of the final SAB review draft of the 812 report which contains the explanation. The discussion of benefits adjustments to EMPAX begins on page 8-13 (p.204 of the pdf). Please forward this to Cortney.

The link is http://www.epa.gov/oar/sect812/aug10/fullreport.pdf
Presidential Documents

38885 

Federal Register 

Vol. 74, No. 149 

Wednesday, August 5, 2009 

Title 3— 

The President 

Memorandum of July 30, 2009 

Guidelines for Human Stem Cell Research 

Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies 

As outlined in Executive Order 13505 of March 9, 2009, my Administration 

is committed to supporting and conducting ethically responsible, scientifically worthy human stem cell research, including human embryonic stem 

cell research, to the extent permitted by law. Pursuant to that order, the 

National Institutes of Health (NIH) published final ‘‘National Institutes of 

Health Guidelines for Human Stem Cell Research’’ (Guidelines), effective 

July 7, 2009. These Guidelines apply to the expenditure of NIH funds 

for research using human embryonic stem cells and certain uses of human 

induced pluripotent stem cells. The Guidelines are based on the principles 

that responsible research with human embryonic stem cells has the potential 

to improve our understanding of human biology and aid in the discovery 

of new ways to prevent and treat illness, and that individuals donating 

embryos for research purposes should do so freely, with voluntary and 

informed consent. These Guidelines will ensure that NIH-funded research 

adheres to the highest ethical standards. 

In order to ensure that all federally funded human stem cell research is 

conducted according to these same principles and to promote a uniform 

Federal policy across the executive branch, I hereby direct the heads of 

executive departments and agencies that support and conduct stem cell 

research to adopt these Guidelines, to the fullest extent practicable in light 

of legal authorities and obligations. I also direct those departments and 

agencies to submit to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB), within 90 days, proposed additions or revisions to any other guidance, policies, or procedures related to human stem cell research, consistent 

with Executive Order 13505 and this memorandum. The Director of the 

OMB shall, in coordination with the Director of NIH, review these proposals 

to ensure consistent implementation of Executive Order 13505 and this 

memorandum. 

This memorandum is not intended to, and does not, create any right or 

benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any 

party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its 

officers, employees, or agents, or any other person. Executive departments 

and agencies shall carry out the provisions of this memorandum to the 

extent permitted by law and consistent with their statutory and regulatory 

authorities and their enforcement mechanisms. 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with MISCELLANEOUS
38886 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 149 / Wednesday, August 5, 2009 / Presidential Documents 

The Director of the OMB is hereby authorized and directed to publish 

this memorandum in the Federal Register. 

[FR Doc. E9–18834 

Filed 8–4–09; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3110–01–P 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with MISCELLANEOUSOB#1.EPS</GPH>
§ 25.2522(d)-1 Additional cross references. ( a ) See section 14 of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (Pub. L. 90-542, 82 Stat. 918) for provisions relating to the claim and allowance of the value of certain easements as a gift under section 2522.
( b ) For treatment of gifts accepted by the Secretary of State or the Secretary of Commerce, for the purpose of organizing and holding an international conference to negotiate a Patent Corporation Treaty, as gifts to or for the use of the United States, see section 3 of Joint Resolution of December 24, 1969 (Pub. L. 91-160, 83 Stat. 443).
( c ) For treatment of gifts accepted by the Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, for the purpose of aiding or facilitating the work of the Department, as gifts to or for the use of the United States, see section 7(k) of the Department of Housing and Urban Development Act (42 U.S.C. 3535), as added by section 905 of Pub. L. 91-609 (84 Stat. 1809).
( d ) For treatment of certain property accepted by the Chairman of the Administrative Conference of the United States, for the purpose of aiding and facilitating the work of the Conference, as gifts to the United States, see 5 U.S.C. 575(c)(12), as added by section 1(b) of the Act of October 21, 1972 (Pub. L. 92-526, 86 Stat. 1048).
( e ) For treatment of the Board for International Broadcasting as a corporation described in section 2522(a)(2), see section 7 of the Board for International Broadcasting Act of 1973 (Pub. L. 93-129, 87 Stat. 459).
[T.D. 7318, 39 FR 25461, July 11, 1974]