alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           2,792
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          16,635
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    158,708
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          13,741
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            13,130
<LOANS>                                        234,104
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,949
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 460,745
<DEPOSITS>                                     275,973
<SHORT-TERM>                                    54,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             22,718
<LONG-TERM>                                     84,617
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            6,444
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,993
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 460,745
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  4,546
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,956
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   118
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 7,620
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,761
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,640
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,980
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      105
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   2392
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    925
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         925
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       738
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .35
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.52
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,075
<LOANS-PAST>                                        10
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     5
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  2,090
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,858
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       14
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,949
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               913
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            685


</TABLE>
www.gpo.gov

### §259. Repealed. Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, §53, 70A Stat. 641

Section, act May 31, 1939, ch. 161, 53 Stat. 795, authorized Secretary of Army to sell supplies to aircraft operated by any foreign military or air attache�AE1 accredited to United States. See sections 4626, 4629, 9626, and 9629 of Title 10, Armed Forces.
#### Peter A. Spina, Appellant, v Kim T. Spina, Respondent.

[803 NYS2d 462]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Philip A. Litteer, R.), entered December 29, 2004 in a divorce action. The order determined that the parties’ postnuptial agreement is invalid and unenforceable.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Kehoe, Martoche and Pine, JJ.
Unassociated Document


    Exhibit
      10.1


    AMENDMENT
      TO CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT

     

    Amendment
      Agreement made this 18th
      day of
      July 2006 by and between Fredric M. Zinn (“Executive”) and Drew Industries
      Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”). 

     

    WHEREAS,
      Executive has been Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
      the
      Company; and

     

    WHEREAS,
      the Company and Executive entered into a Change In Control Agreement effective
      as of September 12, 2003 (the “Agreement”), and wish to amend the Agreement as
      expressly provided herein in order to conform the Agreement to other Change
      in
      Control Agreements subsequently entered into by the Company, 

     

    NOW,
      THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and for other good and valuable
      consideration the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, it is hereby agreed
      as follows:

     

    	1.  	
            AMENDMENT

          


     

    1.1 Section
      5.1 is hereby amended by adding to the end of the second sentence the
      following:

     

    “and
      fifteen (15) miles from the Company’s location on the date hereof.”

     

    1.2 Section
      6.1 is hereby amended by adding the following as the last sentence:

     

    “Such
      payments shall commence on the next payroll payment date following the
      Qualifying Termination.”

     

    	2.  	
            NO
              OTHER CHANGES

          


     

    Except
      as
      set forth in this Amendment Agreement, all terms, provisions, conditions and
      restrictions contained in the Agreement shall remain in full force and
      effect.

     

    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Executive have executed this Amendment
      Agreement the day and year first mentioned above.

     

    


    DREW
      INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED

    


    By: /s/Leigh
      J. Abrams

    


    Name: Leigh
      J. Abrams

    


    Title:
      President and Chief Executive Officer

    


    /s/Fredric
      M. Zinn

    Fredric
      M. Zinn
#### M. L. HORD et al., Respondents, v. G. A. SHEPHERD, Appellant.

Kansas City Court of Appeals,

May 1, 1911.

1. PRACTICE, APPELLATE: Motion for New Trial: Time for Filing. Where the record shows that the motion for new trial was filed at the term succeeding that at which the trial was had and judgment rendered, such motion is out of time and cannot be considered on appeal.

2. -: BUI of Exceptions: Time for Filing. A bill of exceptions must be filed at the term during which final judgment is rendered, unless an extension of time is had; and a bill of exceptions filed at a succeeding term, without such extension, cannot be considered on appeal.

Appeal from Clinton Circuit *Court.*— Hon. *A. D. Burnes,*Judge.

Appeal dismissed.

*397
      *Frost & Frost*for appellant.

*F. B. Ellis*for respondents.

ELLISON, J.

This action was begun before a justice of the peace, on an account for lumber. On appeal to the circuit court judgment was rendered for the plaintiffs.

The record shows that while the judgment was rendered at the September term of court, the motion for new trial was filed at the following January term. The motion was therefore out of time and cannot be considered. The record also shows that the bill of exceptions was not filed until the following April term, and no order granting an extension of time. The bill of exceptions therefore could not be considered even if the motion for new trial had been properly filed.

After plaintiffs had moved to dismiss the appeal for these defects, defendant asked leave to file a supplemental abstract of the record, correcting these defects. Under frequent rulings of the Supreme and Appellate Courts this cannot be allowed. [Everett v. Butler, 192 Mo. 564; Harding v. Bedoll, 202 Mo. 625; Barham v. Shelton, 221 Mo. 66, 69; Weber Imp. Co. v. Hill, 139 Mo. App. 522; Redd v. Ry. Co., 122 Mo. App. 93.]

The appeal is dismissed.

All concur.
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.6231(c)-4 Termination and jeopardy assessment. ( a ) *In general.* The treatment of items as partnership items with respect to a partner against whom an assessment of income tax under section 6851 (termination assessment) or section 6861 (jeopardy assessment) is made will interfere with the effective and efficient enforcement of the internal revenue laws. Accordingly, partnership items of such a partner arising in any partnership taxable year ending with or within the partner's taxable year for which an assessment of income tax under section 6851 or 6861 is made shall be treated as nonpartnership items as of the moment before such assessment is made.
( b ) *Effective date.* This section is applicable to partnership taxable years beginning on or after October 4, 2001. For years beginning prior to October 4, 2001, see § 301.6231(c)-4T contained in 26 CFR part 1, revised April 1, 2001.
[T.D. 8965, 66 FR 50561, Oct. 4, 2001]
§ 514.3 Dividends received by addressee not actual owner. ( a ) *Additional tax to be withheld* — ( 1 ) *Nominee or representative.* The recipient in France of any dividend, paid on or after January 1, 1957, from which United States tax at the reduced rate of 15 percent has been withheld at source pursuant to § 514.2(c)(1), who is a nominee or representative through whom the dividend is received by a person other than one described in § 514.2(a) as being entitled to the reduced rate, shall withhold an additional amount of United States tax equivalent to the United States tax which would have been withheld if the convention had not been in effect (30 percent as of the date of approval of §§ 514.1 to 514.10) minus the 15 percent which has been withheld at the source.
( 2 ) *Fiduciary or partnership.* A fiduciary or a partnership with an address in France which receives, otherwise than as a nominee or representative, a dividend from which United States tax at the reduced rate of 15 percent has been withheld at source pursuant to § 514.2 shall withhold an additional amount of United States tax from the portion of the dividend included in the gross income from sources within the United States of any beneficiary or partner, as the case may be, who is not entitled to the reduced rate of tax in accordance with § 514.2(c). The amount of the additional tax is to be calculated in the same manner as under subparagraph (1) of this paragraph.
( 3 ) *Released amounts of tax.* If any amount of United States tax is released pursuant to § 514.8(a)(1) by the withholding agent in the United States with respect to a dividend paid to a nominee, representative, fiduciary, or partnership with an address in France, the latter shall withhold from such released amount any additional amount of United States tax, otherwise required to be withheld from the dividend by the provisions of subparagraphs (1) and (2) of this paragraph, in the same manner as if at the time of payment of the dividends United States tax at the rate of only 15 percent had been withheld at source therefrom.
( b ) *Returns filed by French withholding agents.* The amounts withheld pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section by any withholding agent in France shall be deposited, without converting the amounts into United States dollars, with the Directeur General des Impots of France on or before the 15th day after the close of the quarter of the calendar year in which the withholding in France occurs. The withholding agent making the deposit shall render therewith such appropriate French form as may be prescribed by the Directeur General des Impots. The amounts so deposited should be remitted by the Directeur General des Impots by draft in the United States dollars to the Director, International Operations Division, Internal Revenue Service, Washington 25, D. C., U. S. A., on or before the end of the calendar month in which the deposit is made, and should be accompanied by such French form as may be required to be rendered by the withholding agent in France in connection with the deposit.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                           GTECH HOLDINGS CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GTECH Holdings Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 29, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the Date hereof (the "Report"), I, W.
Bruce Turner, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to sections 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                    GTECH HOLDINGS CORPORATION

Date: July 2, 2004                  By /s/ W. Bruce Turner
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    W. Bruce Turner
                                    President and Chief Executive Officer
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.9100-9T Election by a bank holding company to forego grandfather provision for all property representing pre-June 30, 1968, activities. ( a ) *In general.* For purposes of sections 1101 through 1103 and 6158 of the Code, a bank holding company may elect under section 1103(g) to have the determination of whether property is prohibited property or is property eligible to be distributed without recognition of gain under section 1101(b)(1) made under the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1841 *et seq.*) as if the Act did not contain the proviso of section 4(a)(2) thereof.
( b ) *Manner of making election.* The election under section 1103(g) shall be made in a written statement filed with the Federal Reserve Board indicating that by resolution of its board of directors, the bank holding company is electing to apply the provisions of section 1103(g). In addition, the bank holding company shall indicate on its income tax return for each taxable year in which the election applies to a distribution or sale of property (in the manner specified in the Internal Revenue Service's instructions for the preparation of the return) that it has made the election under section 1103(g). The election shall be considered to be made on the date on which the written statement is received by the Federal Reserve Board.
( c ) *Scope of election.* The election under section 1103(g) applies to all determinations of whether property is prohibited property or is property eligible to be distributed without recognition of gain under section 1101(b)(1).
( d ) *Election; binding effect.* An election made under section 1103(g) is irrevocable.
( e ) *Final certification.* An election under section 1103(g) shall not apply unless the final certification referred to in section 1101(e) or section 6158(c)(2), as the case may be, includes a certification by the Federal Reserve Board that the bank holding company has disposed of either all banking property or all nonbanking property (including property described in the proviso of section 4(a)(2) of the Bank Holding Company Act).
( f ) *Conditional certification.* A certification by the Federal Reserve Board under section 1101 (a)(1)(B), 1101 (b)(1)(B), 1101 (c)(2)(C), 1101 (c)(3)(C), or 6158(a) that is conditioned upon the bank holding company's making an election under section 1103(g) shall not be considered to be made before the distribution or sale unless the certification and the election are made before the distribution or sale.
[T.D. 7570, 43 FR 52057, Nov. 8, 1978. Redesignated by T.D. 8435, 57 FR 43896, Sept. 23, 1992]
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.6051-1 Receipts for employees.

For provisions relating to statements for employees regarding remuneration paid during calendar year, see § 31.6051-1 of this chapter (Employment Tax Regulations).
www.gpo.gov

### §282n. Authority to agree to amendments to Articles of Agreement

The United States Governor of the Corporation is authorized to agree to amendments to the Articles of Agreement of the Corporation that would—

(1) amend Article II, Section 2(c)(ii), to increase the vote by which the Board of Governors of the Corporation may increase the capital stock of the Corporation from a three-fourths majority to a four-fifths majority; and

(2) amend Article VII(a) to increase the vote by which the Board of Governors of the Corporation may amend the Articles of Agreement of the Corporation from a four-fifths majority to an eighty-five percent majority.

(Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 788, §16, as added Pub. L. 102–511, title X, §1006, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3361.)
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to thatcertain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2016, by andamong DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, KEYBANK NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asTrustee,  WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as CertificateAdministrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC,as Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer with respect toCommercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-CD2 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.11 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the Master Servicer during the period from December 1, 2016 through December31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”),  and of its performance per theAgreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the ReportingPeriod.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

  

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President                       

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 111 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
H. J. RES. 111

Providing for the appointment of Anne D'Harnoncourt as a citizen regent 
        of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 29, 1995

Mr. Livingston (for himself, Mr. Mineta, and Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas) 
 introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on House Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for the appointment of Anne D'Harnoncourt as a citizen regent 
        of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 
43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian 
Institution, in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by 
reason of the expiration of the term of Samuel Curtis Johnson of 
Wisconsin on December 4, 1995, is filled by the appointment of Anne 
D'Harnoncourt of Pennsylvania. The appointment is for a term of six 
years and shall take effect on December 5, 1995.
                                 <all>
```
August 09, 2013

Mr. Kerrick R. Philleo

3280 Lakemont Drive

Eugene, OR 97408

Dear Mr. Philleo:

This is in response to your letter dated July 10, 2013 (public docket No. FAA-2002-13712)

petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for an extension of Exemption 

No. 7930, as amended. That exemption from § 91.109(a) of Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations allows you to conduct certain flight instruction and simulated instrument flights 

to meet the recent experience requirements in Beechcraft Bonanza and Beechcraft Debonair 

airplanes equipped with a functioning throwover control wheel in place of functioning dual 

controls.

On August 19, 2011, the FAA issued a revision to14 CFR § 91.109 as part of it “Pilot in 

Command Proficiency Check and Other Changes to the Pilot and Pilot School Certification 

Rules” final rule (76 FR 54095; August 31, 2011), which became effective October 31, 2011. 

A copy of the rule is enclosed.

Since the relief you requested is permitted in the revised § 91.109, an exemption is no longer 

required. Therefore we will take no further action on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda D. Courtney

Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division

Enclosure