alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 127 (Tuesday, July 2, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39728-39729]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15830]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK

Economic Impact Policy

    This notice is to inform the public that the Export-Import Bank of 
the United States has received an application for a $675 million direct 
loan to support the export of approximately $525 million in U.S. 
licenses and packaged refinery equipment to an oil refinery in Turkey. 
The U.S. exports will enable the facility to produce approximately: 
4,600 metric tons of naphtha per day; 1,200 metric tons of xylene per 
day; 2,500 metric tons of petroleum coke (pet coke) per day; and 450 
metric tons of sulfur per day. Available information indicates that the 
sulfur and pet coke will be sold into the

[[Page 39729]]

global market, and the remaining foreign output will be sold in Turkey.
    Interested parties may submit comments on this transaction by email 
to economic.impact@exim.gov or by mail to 811 Vermont Avenue NW., Room 
445, Washington, DC 20571, within 14 days of the date this notice 
appears in the Federal Register.

James Cruse,
Senior Vice President, Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. 2013-15830 Filed 7-1-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
#### §§ 1.48C-1-1.48C-2 [Reserved]
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.6049-1 Returns regarding payments of interest.

For provisions relating to the requirement of returns regarding payments of interest, see §§ 1.6049-1 to 1.6049-3, inclusive, of this chapter (Income Tax Regulations).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary informaiton extracted from the balance sheet of
CNL Income Fund VIII, Ltd. at September 30, 1996, and its statement of income
for the nine months then ended and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
the Form 10-Q of CNL Income Fund VIII, Ltd. for the nine months ended September
30, 1996.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,486,491
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,217
<ALLOWANCES>                                    16,683
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      15,906,963
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,177,320
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,400,737
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,352,568
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,400,737
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,493,880
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  302,580
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,274,726
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,274,726
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,274,726
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Due to the nature of its industry, CNL Income Fund VIII, Ltd. has an
unclassified balance sheet; therfore, no values are shown above for current
assets and current liabilities.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
IA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 36

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating

to the election of the President and Vice President.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. ORTON introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States relating to the election of the President and Vice

President.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution if ratified

7 by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States
2

HJ 36 IH

1 within seven years after its submission to the States for

2 ratification:

3 ‘‘ARTICLE—

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. The people of the several States and the

5 District constituting the seat of government of the United

6 States shall elect the President and Vice President. Each

7 citizen eligible shall cast a single vote for two persons who

8 shall have consented to the joining of their names as can9 didates for the offices of the President and Vice President.

10 No candidate shall consent to the joinder of his name with

11 that of more than one other person.

12 ‘‘SECTION 2. The citizens eligible to vote for election

13 of President and Vice President in each State shall have

14 the qualifications requisite for voters of the most numer15 ous branch of the State legislature, except that for voters

16 for President and Vice President, the legislature of any

17 State may prescribe less restrictive residence qualifications

18 and for voters for President and Vice President the Con19 gress may establish uniform residence qualifications.

20 ‘‘SECTION 3. The pair of persons having the greatest

21 number of votes for President and Vice President shall

22 be elected.

23 ‘‘SECTION 4. The times, places, and manner of hold24 ing such elections and entitlement to inclusion on the bal25 lot shall be prescribed in each State by the legislature
3

HJ 36 IH

1 thereof; but the Congress may at any time by law make

2 or alter such regulations. The days for such elections shall

3 be determined by Congress and shall be uniform through4 out the United States. The Congress shall prescribe by

5 law the time, place, and manner in which the results of

6 such elections shall be ascertained and declared.

7 ‘‘SECTION 5. The Congress may by law provide for

8 the case of the death or withdrawal of any candidate for

9 President or Vice President before a President and Vice

10 President have been elected, and for the case of the death

11 of both the President-elect and Vice President-elect.

12 ‘‘SECTION 6. This article shall take effect one year

13 after the 21st day of January following ratification.’’.

Æ
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.6873-1 Unpaid claims in bankruptcy or receivership proceedings. ( a ) If any portion of the claim allowed by the court in a receivership proceeding, or in any proceeding under the Bankruptcy Act (11 U.S.C. chs. 1-14) remains unpaid after the termination of such proceeding, the district director will send notice and demand for payment thereof to the taxpayer. Such unpaid portion with interest as provided in section 6601 may be collected from the taxpayer by levy or proceeding in court within the period of limitation for collection after assessment. For the general rule as to such period of limitation, see section 6502, and for suspension of the running of the period provided in section 6502, see, for example, section 6503. For suspensions under other provisions of law, see, for example, section 11f of the Bankruptcy Act (11 U.S.C. 29(f)). Extension of time for the payment of such unpaid amount may be granted in the same manner and subject to the same provisions and limitations as provided in section 6161(c).
( b ) Section 6873 is applicable only where a claim for taxes is allowed in a receivership proceeding or in a proceeding under the Bankruptcy Act. Claims for taxes, interest, additional amounts, or additions to the tax may be collectible in equity or under other provisions of law although no claim was allowed in the proceeding because, for example, such items were not included in a proof of claim filed in the proceeding or no proof of claim was filed. Except in the case of a proceeding under section 77 or chapter X of the Bankruptcy Act, a tax or a liability in respect thereof is not discharged by a proceeding under such act, whether or not a claim is filed in such proceeding, and provisions suspending the running of the period of limitation on the collection of taxes are applicable, whether or not a claim is filed in such proceeding.
## COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00292

- CV

TIM BRANDON APPELLANT

V.

WELLS FARGO BANK WAL LACE HALL, INDIVIDUALLY A MIA BECKER, INDIVIDUALLY CRYSTAL CASTILLO, INDIVIDUAL LY APPELLEES

------------

FROM THE 141ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------


### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

------------ On November 19, 2012, we notified appellant that his brief did not comply

with rules of appellate procedure 9.4(h) and 38.1(a)

– (k) and local rules 1.A and

1.A(8). We gave appellant until November 29, 2012, to file an amended brief that

complied with these rules and informed him that failure to do so might result in

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

striking the brief he had filed, waiver of noncomplying points, or dismissal of the

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 38.9(a), 42.3.

On December 11, 2012 , we notified appellant that because his amended

brief had not been filed

, we w ould dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution

unless

, on or before December 21, 2012, he or any party desiring to con tinue the

appeal filed with the court a motion reasonably explaining the failure to file his

amended brief and the need for an extension

. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1),

42.3. Having received no response, we dismiss the appeal for want of

prosecution. S ee Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MCCOY, MEIER

, and GABRIEL, JJ.

DELIVERED: January 1 7 , 2013
| (logo)usbank  | All  of **us** serving you |
|--------------------|----------------------------|

 

**Annual Statement ofCompliance**

MSJP 2015-HAUL

 

*VIA: EMAIL*

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.

1585 Broadway

New York, New York 10036

Attention: Stephen Holmes

Stephen.holmes@morganstanley.com

 

 

 

Re:         Trust and Servicing Agreementdated as of October 1, 2015 (the “Agreement”) between Morgan StanleyCapital I Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asServicer and Special Servicer, and U.S. Bank National Association, asCertificate Administrator and Trustee.

 

I, Kimberly O. Jacobs, a Senior VicePresident of U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator, as acertifying servicer hereby certify that:

 

(1) A review of the activities of theCertificate Administrator during the preceding calendar year (the “ReportingPeriod”) and of the performance of the Certificate Administrator under theAgreement has been made under my supervision; and

 

(2) To the best of my knowledge, based onsuch review, the Certificate Administrator has fulfilled all their obligationsunder the Agreement in all material respects throughout such Reporting Period. 

  

Capitalized terms used but not definedherein have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.

 

 

Date:March 1, 2018

 

 

U.S.Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator

 

 

By:/s/ Kimberly O. Jacobs

KimberlyO. Jacobs

SeniorVice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1997
<CASH>                                      21,208,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              224,567,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 9,539,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           256,764,000
<PP&E>                                      49,587,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              37,851,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             345,643,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      160,564,000
<BONDS>                                    137,643,000<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       224,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  34,749,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               345,643,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           265,957,000<F2>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              232,266,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               447,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,353,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,584,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   568,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             47,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    47,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
<FN>
<F1>Excludes current portion of bonds, mortgage, and similar debt.
<F2>Represents gross revenue which includes costs of certain services
subcontracted to third parties and other reimbursable direct project costs, such
as materials procured by the Company on behalf of its customers.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 153 (Tuesday, August 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 40189]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19208]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreements Filed; Correction

AGENCY: Federal Maritime Commission.

    Citation of Previous Notice of Agreements Filed: 74 FR 37709, July 
29, 2009.
    Previous Notice of Agreements Filed Dated: July 24, 2009.
    Correction to the Notice of Agreements Filed: All of the Filing 
Parties and the complete Synopsis of Agreement No. 201204 were not 
printed in the original Notice. The complete Notice should read as 
follows:
    Agreement No.: 201204.
    Title: Port of Houston Authority and Houston Marine Terminal 
Operators/Freight Handlers Agreement.
    Parties: Port of Houston Authority; Ceres Gulf, Inc.; Chaparral 
Stevedoring Company of Texas, Inc.; CT Stevedoring, Inc. dba Cooper/T. 
Smith Stevedoring Co.; Ports America Texas, Inc.; GP Terminals LLC; 
Shippers Stevedoring Company; and SSA Gulf, Inc.
    Filing Party: Erik A. Eriksson, Esq.; Port of Houston Authority; 
Executive Office; 111 East Loop; Houston, TX 77029-4327.
    Synopsis: The agreement authorizes the Port of Houston Authority 
and seven affiliated freight handlers to discuss and voluntarily agree 
on matters of common interest at the Port of Houston.
    Contact Person for More Information: Karen V. Gregory, Secretary, 
(202) 523-5725.

Tanga S. FitzGibbon,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-19208 Filed 8-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY


ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Invitation Homes Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John B. Bartling Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|   |                                                                                                                      
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:/s/ John B. Bartling Jr.John B. Bartling Jr.President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)








March 30, 2017





A signed original of this certification required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

JUSTIN AHMAD CLARK, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 635 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 1st day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED. 

Justices Eakin and Wecht did not participate in the decision of this matter.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of Jordan American Holdings, Inc. for the period ending
September 30, 1997, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         592,769
<SECURITIES>                                   588,794
<RECEIVABLES>                                  202,663
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,588,155
<PP&E>                                         323,537
<DEPRECIATION>                                  97,001
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,814,190
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          445,445
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     30,000
<COMMON>                                        10,559
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,328,186
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,814,190
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,116,011
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (515,520)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (515,520)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (515,520)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)
        


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2022 ND 60

Cliffton T. Fourth, Petitioner and Appellant

v.

State of North Dakota, Respondent 

No. 20210285

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial 

District, the Honorable James S. Hill, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Benjamin C. Pulkrabek, Mandan, ND, for petitioner and appellant; submitted 

on brief.

FILED 

IN THE OFFICE OF THE 

CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 

MARCH 17, 2022 

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
1

Fourth v. State

No. 20210285

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Cliffton Fourth appeals from an order denying his application for postconviction relief claiming he received ineffective assistance of counsel during a 

probation revocation hearing. Following an evidentiary hearing on his 

application, the district court found Fourth failed to establish the first prong 

of the Strickland test that his attorney’s representation fell below an objective 

standard of reasonableness and, even if Fourth had met the first prong, he did 

not establish he was prejudiced by the alleged deficient performance. The 

district court did not clearly err in finding Fourth did not prove ineffective 

assistance of counsel and denying his application for post-conviction relief. We 

summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.

Gerald W. VandeWalle

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jerod E. Tufte
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 .
  1.
    
    the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the
periods presented in the Form 10-Q.
 Date:  May 8, 2008
    /s/ J. Marcus ScrudderJ. MARCUS SCRUDDERChief Financial Officer