alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.9(e)


FOURTH AMENDMENT


TO


ADVANCED MEDICAL OPTICS, INC.


401(K) PLAN


The Section 5.3(d) of the Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. 401(k) Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended as follows:


I.                                         Section 5.3(d) of the Plan is amended as follows:


(d)       For the 2005 and 2006 Plan Year, the
Company shall contribute and allocate, for each Participant
                    set
forth in Appendix C — Special Provisions for Transferred Pharmacia Employees,
which is hereby attached and
                    made a
part of the Plan, a Profit Sharing Contribution in addition to the Profit-Sharing
Contribution described in
                    subsection
(c) above which, when added to Forfeitures available after the application of
Section 6.3, is equal to the
                    allocation
amount set forth for each such Participant in the attached Appendix C.


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. hereby executes this Fourth
Amendment to the Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. 401(k) Plan on this 14th day of December, 2006.


ADVANCED MEDICAL OPTICS, INC.


	
  BY:

  	
  /s/ AIMEE WEISNER

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Aimee Weisner

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Corporate Vice President, General Counsel, and
  Secretary
# r--6--6f

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 23
- 0246 SADDLEBROOK INVESTMENTS, LLC, as Assignee of Stuart M. Simonsen,

Plaintiff and Appellant,
v. KROHNE FUND, L.P.,

Defendant and Appellee. ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c), IT IS ORDERED THAT **Jacquelyn Marjorie Hughes,** whose name appears next on the list o f attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Money Judgments appeals which is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment. A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof. DATED this May 23, 2023.

Bowen Greenwood , Clerk of the Supreme Court
c: Matthew B. Gallinger, Steven Leon Stockdale, T. Thomas Singer, Greyson Douglas Hill, Amanda G. Hunter, Jacquelyn Marjorie Hughes 05/23/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0246
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sky Financial Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Marty E. Adams, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Marty E. Adams     
|Marty E. Adams         
|Chairman, President and
|Chief Executive Officer



May
10, 2004
### BEFOR E TH E DEPARTMEN TO F TRANSPORTATIO N WASHINGTON , D.C .
Agreement s Adopte d b yth e Traffi c Conference s o f th e Internationa l Ai r Transpor t Associatio n 

## OST-2011 - a / Z^

APPLICATIO N FO R APPROVA L O F AGREEMENT S

BYTH E INTERNATIONA L AI R TRANSPOR TASSOCIATIO N lAT A AGREEMEN T APPROVE D & IMMUNIZE D DOCKET OST-_££^ - O ( 2. H ACTIO N DAT E 

# /i^^f2. ^ 2 0 l i Thi s approval andgran t

o f antitrus t immunity i s subject , wher e applicable , t o condition s previousl y imposed . Tiii s actio n i s effectiv e afler 7 day s unles s apetitio n i s file dunde r 14 CF R385.3 0 o r

arevie w i s undertake n o n th e Department' s own motion . I n vie w o f th e agreement' s nor.controversial natur e an dth e availability o f th e above^ocedure , tj)af2j^ay,p^p di n 1 4 CF R303.4 2 i s waived .



## 7 Jul y 201 1 Communication s wit h respec t t o thi s documen t shoul d b e sen t t o Dougla s E . Lavi n Regiona l Vic e Presiden t - Nort h Americ a Internationa l Ai rTranspor t Associatio n 177 6 K.St . N.W.#12'''Floo r Washingto n D C 2000 6
#### § 20.2208-1 Certain residents of possessions considered citizens of the United States.

As used in this part, the term “citizen of the United States” is considered to include a decedent dying after September 2, 1958, who, at the time of his death, was domiciled in a possession of the United States and was a United States citizen, and who did not acquire his United States citizenship solely by reason of his being a citizen of such possession or by reason of his birth or residence within such possession. The estate of such a decedent is, therefore, subject to the tax imposed by section 2001. See paragraph (a)(2) of § 20.0-1 and § 20.2209-1 for further information relating to the application of the Federal estate tax to the estates of decedents who were residents of possessions of the United States. The application of this section may be illustrated by the following example and the examples set forth in § 20.2209-1:

# Example.

A, a citizen of the United States by reason of his birth in the United States at San Francisco, established residence in Puerto Rico and acquired a Puerto Rican citizenship. A died on September 4, 1958, while a citizen and domiciliary of Puerto Rico. A's estate is, by reason of the provisions of section 2208, subject to the tax imposed by section 2001 inasmuch as his United States citizenship is based on birth in the United States and is not based solely on being a citizen of a possession or solely on birth or residence in a possession.

[T.D. 6526, 26 FR 417, Jan. 19, 1961]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

LAW OFFICE OF KRUG, §

§ No. 106, 2019

Defendant-Below, §

Appellant/Cross-Appellee, § Court Below:

§ Court of Chancery

v. § of the State of Delaware

§

A&J CAPITAL, INC., § C.A. No. 2018-0240-JRS

§

Plaintiff-Below, §

Appellee/Cross-Appellant. §

Submitted: October 30, 2019

Decided: November 1, 2019

Before VALIHURA, Acting Chief Justice;* SEITZ and TRAYNOR, Justices. 

O R D E R

This 1st day of November 2019, the court having considered this matter on the briefs 

and oral arguments of the parties and the record below and having concluded that the same 

should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Court of Chancery 

in its Memorandum Opinion dated January 29, 2019 and its Final Order and Judgment 

dated February 8, 2019;

NOW, THEREFORE IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of Chancery 

be and the same hereby is, AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Acting Chief Justice

 

* Pursuant to Del. Const. Art. IV §§ 2, 13.
§ 1.9000-5 Effect of filing statement. ( a ) *Years other than years affected by a net operating loss carryback.* If the taxpayer files a timely statement in accordance with the provisions of § 1.9000-3, the amount of the increase in tax shown on such statement for a taxable year shall, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, be considered for all purposes of the Code, as tax shown on the return for such year. In general, such increase shall be assessed and collected in the same manner as if it had been tax shown on the return as originally filed. The provisions of this paragraph may be illustrated by the following example: Example. A taxpayer filed his return showing a tax liability computed under the methods of accounting provided by sections 452 and 462 as $1,000 and filed the statement in accordance with § 1.9000-3 showing an increase in tax liability of $200. The tax computed as though sections 452 and 462 had not been enacted is $1,200, and the difference of $200 is the increase in the tax attributable to the repeal of sections 452 and 462. This increase is considered to be tax shown on the return for such taxable year. Additions to the tax for fraud or negligence under section 6653 will be determined by reference to $1,200 (that is, $1,000 plus $200) as the tax shown on the return.
( b ) *Years affected by a net operating loss carryback.* In the case of a year which is affected by a net operating loss carryback from a year to which an election under section 452 or 462 applies, that portion of the amount of increase in tax shown on the statement for the year to which the loss is carried back which is attributable to a decrease in such net operating loss shall not be treated as tax shown on the return.
.6903 NM 1.282 NM 1.874 NM 

# N 30kt Wind - Due West 

## Proposed Auke Bay Route - Westerly Wind = Minimum Autorotation Glide Distance AS-350 at 2,000ft AGL w/ No Wind = Autorotation Glide Distance Given a 30kt Westerly Wind at 1700ft/min rate of descent from 2,000ft AGL with a 65kt glide speed =Proposed Landing Site
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       2,592,318
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,812,135
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,116,110
<PP&E>                                       2,081,151
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,246,052
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,005,603
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,135,135
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,203
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,858,265
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,005,603
<SALES>                                     10,640,405
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,640,405
<CGS>                                        5,361,393
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,361,393
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,658,108
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,620,904
<INCOME-TAX>                                   969,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,651,204
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,651,204
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13


</TABLE>
§ 25.6091-1 Place for filing returns and other documents. ( a ) *In general.* If the donor is a resident of the United States, the gift tax return required by section 6019 shall be filed with any person assigned the responsibility to receive returns in the local Internal Revenue Service office that serves the legal residence or principal place of business of the donor. If the donor is a nonresident (whether or not a citizen), and his principal place of business is served by a local Internal Revenue Service office, the gift tax return shall be filed with any person assigned the responsibility to receive returns in that office.
( b ) *Returns filed with service centers.* Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, unless a return is filed by hand carrying, whenever instructions applicable to gift tax returns provide that the returns be filed with a service center, the returns must be so filed in accordance with the instructions. Returns which are filed by hand carrying shall be filed with any person assigned the responsibility to receive hand-carried returns in the local Internal Revenue Service office in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) *Returns of certain nonresidents.* If the donor is a nonresident (whether or not a citizen), and he does not have a principal place of business in the United States, the gift tax return required by section 6019, whether or not such return is made by hand carrying, shall be filed with the Internal Revenue Service Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, or as designated on the return form or in the instructions issued with respect to such form.
(Secs. 6091, 7805 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (68A Stat. 917; 26 U.S.C. 7805))
[T.D. 7012, 34 FR 7692, May 15, 1969, as amended by T.D. 7238, 37 FR 28737, Dec. 29, 1972; 39 FR 797, Jan. 3, 1974; T.D. 7495, 42 FR 33726, July 1, 1977; T.D. 9156, 69 FR 55745, Sept. 16, 2004]
(logo) pwc

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

To Management of AEGON USARealty Advisors, LLC

 

We have examinedmanagement’s assertion, included in the accompanying *Report on Assessmentof Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria Pursuant to Item 1122(d) ofRegulation AB under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934*, that AEGON USARealty Advisors, LLC (“AEGON” or the “Company”)complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of theSecurities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the commercialmortgage backed securities transactions listed in management’s assertion(the “Platform”), as of December 31, 2016 and for the year then ended,excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i), 1122(d)(3)(ii),1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x),1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), 1122(d)(4)(xiii), 1122(d)(4)(xiv) and1122(d)(4)(xv), which AEGON has determined are not applicable to the servicingactivities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Management isresponsible for the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. Ourresponsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion basedon our examination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in thecircumstances. Our examination included testing of selected asset-backedtransactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selectedservicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether theCompany processed those selected transactions and performed those selectedactivities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedureswere limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed bythe Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were notdesigned to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurredprior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances oramounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by thisreport. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for ouropinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on theCompany’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that AEGON complied with the aforementionedapplicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

February 28, 2017

 

 

*PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,1100 Walnut Street, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106*

*T: (816) 472 7921, F:(816)218 1890,*www.pwc.com/us
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
R.P. SCHERER CORPORATION'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FILING.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          30,982
<SECURITIES>                                     2,822
<RECEIVABLES>                                  134,998
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,566
<INVENTORY>                                     66,804
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               243,829
<PP&E>                                         481,612
<DEPRECIATION>                                 128,273
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 782,008
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          109,055
<BONDS>                                        159,389
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           242
<OTHER-SE>                                     402,118
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   782,008
<SALES>                                        449,365
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               449,365
<CGS>                                          301,960
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  374,761
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,296
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 69,308
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,365
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             52,790
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    52,790
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.65
        

</TABLE>
l>oT-oerr-2.c?oo-(^T>5 

Pacific LLC. 

P.O. Box 20280 

Mesa, Arizon a 85277-028 0 

888) 575-454 6 Tol l Free 

www. pacificwings.co m 

January 25, 2011 

VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL 

Mr. Dennis DeVany, 

Essential Air Service Chief 

US Department of Transportation 

EAS and Domestic Analysis Division 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

W86-471 

Washington, DC 20590 

iv> 

CD 

O 

soo 

o ^ 

CO 

Dear Mr. DeVany, 

Thank you for your consideration of Pacific Wings' request to 

re-implement subsidized Essential Air Service at Kalaupapa, 

Hawaii. 

Pacific Wings has served the community without subsidy for 

approximately four years. During this time, our airline has 

offered fares for travel to Kalaupapa equivalent to (or less 

than) those offered by subsidized EAS carriers serving other 

remote locations throughout the country. 

Pacific Wings has devoted considerable time and resources to 

addressing concerns about the cost of Kalaupapa travel, 

expressed to the Department and the airline by various 

community representatives. These individuals believe EAS 

subsidies should be used to provide lower air fares. 

Pacific Wings takes no position on use of EAS subsidies for 

this purpose; however, the airline does believe any taxpayer 

investment or changes to the company's business model must be 

coherent, cost-justified and fully rationalized. 

Through our continuing dialogue with the community. Pacific 
D. DEVANY - 25 JAN 2011 

Wings has determined a level of consensuses necessary to 

manage expectations and ensure success does not yet exist. 

Moreover, the apparent perception of undefined service issues 

requires that the airline explore and resolve any real or 

imagined problems before proceeding. 

Pacific Wings hereby withdraws its notice of intent to claim 

EAS subsidy at Kalaupapa, Hawaii, dated 0 6 DEC 2010. Pacific 

Wings will continue to provide the current level of service to 

Kalaupapa without subsidy, just as it has for approximately 

four years. 

Pacific Wings will continue to work with the community to 

identify and address specific details of any alleged service 

issues; and, may request subsidy again at some point in the 

future, when conditions are more conducive to success. 

Re^peerr^ully, 

Greg Kahlstorf 

Chief Executive Officer 

Pacific Wings, L.L.C. 

Paae 2
No. 76-6487.

#### Vitale *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Order filed October 6, 2022

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 22

- 00591

- CV

____________ JERROD HOYLE , Appellant

V.

507 HOSEA STREET LLC, A SEPERATE SERVICES OF EWALD

INVESTMENTS LLC , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law Washington County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2022

- 101



### O R D E R

The notice of appeal in this case was filed August 9, 2022. To date, the filing fee of $20 5.00 has not been paid. No evidence that appellant is excused by statute or the Texas Rule s of Appellate Procedure from paying costs has been filed. See Tex. R. App. P

. 5

. Accordingly, a ppellant is ordered to pay th e filing fee in the amount of $20 5.00 to the c lerk of this court within ten (10) days of the date of this order. If appellant fail s to do so, the appeal is subject to dismissal without further notice for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Hassan.
(logo) Deutsche Bank

 

1761 East St. Andrew Place

Santa Ana, CA 92705-4934

 

Tel 714 247 6000

Fax 714 247 6009 

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TOCOMPLIANCE

 

 

DBJPM 2016-SFC Mortgage Trust

 

 

The undersigned, David Co, aDirector of Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as the CertificateAdministrator (a "Certifying Servicer") under the Trust and ServicingAgreement, dated as of August 1, 2016 (the "Agreement"), by andamong, Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor, WellsFargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Pacific Life InsuranceCompany, as Special Servicer, Wilmington Trust, National Association, asTrustee, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as CertificateAdministrator, Paying Agent, and Custodian, here by certifies in accordancewith Section 11.07 of the Agreement:

 

A) A review of such CertifyingServicer's activities from August 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 (the"reporting period") and of such Certifying Servicer's performanceunder the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision  and

 

B) That, as to the best ofsuch officer's knowledge, based on such review, such Certifying Servicer hasfulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement, in all material respectsthroughout the reporting period.

 

 

DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANYAMERICAS

as Certificate Administrator

 

 

/s/ David Co

BY: David Co 

Title:  Director

Date: March 1, 2017