39712 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 151 / Friday, August 7, 2009 / Notices 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Inv. No. 337–TA–682] 

Notice of Investigation; In the Matter of 

Certain Collaborative System Products 

and Components Thereof 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Institution of investigation 

pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on July 

2, 2009, under section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 

1337, on behalf of eInstruction 

Corporation of Denton, Texas. 

Supplements to the complaint were 

filed on July 10, 2009 and July 23, 2009. 

The complaint, as supplemented, 

alleges violations of section 337 based 

upon the importation into the United 

States, the sale for importation, and the 

sale within the United States after 

importation of certain collaborative 

system products and components 

thereof by reason of infringement of 

certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 

6,930,673. The complaint further alleges 

that an industry in the United States 

exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of 

section 337. 

The complainant requests that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue an 

exclusion order and a cease and desist 

order. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint and 

supplements, except for any 

confidential information contained 

therein, are available for inspection 

during official business hours (8:45 a.m. 

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 

112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 

202–205–2000. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server at http:// 

www.usitc.gov. The public record for 

this investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Aarti Shah, Esq., Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, telephone (202) 205–2657. 

Authority: The authority for institution of 

this investigation is contained in section 337 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 

in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules 

of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 

(2008). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

August 3, 2009, ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain collaborative 

system products or components thereof 

that infringe one or more of claims 

1–3, 6–10, 13–18, and 21–24 of U.S. 

Patent No. 6,930,673, and whether an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by subsection (a)(2) of section 

337; 

(2) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainant is—eInstruction 

Corporation, 308 N. Carroll Boulevard, 

Denton, Texas 76201. 

(b) The respondent is the following 

entity alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and is the party upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

QOMO HiteVision, LLC, 28265 Beck 

Road, Suite C–1, Wixom, Michigan 

48393. 

(c) The Commission investigative 

attorney, party to this investigation, is 

Aarti Shah, Esq., Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite 

401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(3) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Honorable Paul J. Luckern, Chief 

Administrative Law Judge, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, shall 

designate the presiding Administrative 

Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondent in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such 

responses will be considered by the 

Commission if received not later than 20 

days after the date of service by the 

Commission of the complaint and the 

notice of investigation. Extensions of 

time for submitting responses to the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation will not be granted unless 

good cause therefor is shown. 

Failure of the respondent to file a 

timely response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

Issued: August 3, 2009. 

William R. Bishop, 

Acting Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E9–18935 Filed 8–6–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree 

Under the Clean Air Act 

Notice is hereby given that on August 

4, 2009, a proposed Consent Decree in 

United States et al. v. Aleris 

International, Inc. et al., Civil Action 

No. 1:09–cv–00340, was lodged with the 

United States District Court for the 

Northern District of Ohio. 

The Consent Decree would resolve 

claims for injunctive relief and the 

assessment of civil penalties asserted by 

the United States; the States of Idaho, 

Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, 

Tennessee, and West Virginia; the 

Commonwealths of Kentucky and 

Virginia; the Oklahoma Department of 

Environmental Quality; and the 

Maricopa County Air Quality 

Department (collectively, ‘‘Plaintiffs’’) 

against Aleris International, Inc. and 13 

of its subsidiaries (collectively, 

‘‘Aleris’’) pursuant to Sections 113(b) 

and 304(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act, 42 

U.S.C. 7413(b) and 7604(a)(1). 

Aleris processes aluminum scrap and 

dross to produce various secondary 

aluminum products, a process that 

results in emissions of regulated air 

pollutants, including dioxins and 

furans, hydrogen chloride, particulate 

matter, and hydrocarbons. The 

Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint, filed 

concurrently with the Consent Decree, 

alleges that Aleris violated Section 112 

of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7412; the 

National Emissions Standards for 

Hazardous Air Pollutants (‘‘NESHAP’’) 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES