alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 200

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 25, 1996

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Honoring the victims of the June 25, 1996, terrorist bombing

in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.

Whereas on June 25, 1996, a terrorist truck bomb outside

a military housing compound in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia,

killed 19 members of the Armed Forces and wounded

hundreds of others;

Whereas the members of the Armed Forces killed and wounded in the bombing were defending the national security

interests of the United States;
2

HCON 200 RDS

Whereas the defense of United States national interests continues to require the forward deployment of members of

the Armed Forces to other countries;

Whereas the members of the Armed Forces are called upon

to perform duties that place their lives at risk from terrorist elements hostile to the United States;

Whereas global terrorism has demonstrated no respect for the

historic rules of war, no reluctance to strike against innocent and defenseless individuals, and a willingness to engage in tactics against which conventional defenses are

difficult;

Whereas it is the duty of the President and the military chain

of command to take all necessary steps to keep members

of the Armed Forces protected and as safe as the nature

of their mission permits;

Whereas the people of the United States stand with those

who have volunteered to serve their country and grieve at

the loss of those who, to quote Lincoln, ‘‘have given their

last full measure of devotion’’ to the security and wellbeing of the United States;

Whereas those members of the Armed Forces serving in

Saudi Arabia and around the world demonstrate valor

and a faith in the American way of life that reflects honorably not only on themselves but upon the country that

they represent; and

Whereas the military personnel who lost their lives on June

25, 1996, in the bombing in Dhahran died in the honorable service of their Nation and exemplified all that is

best and most virtuous in the American people: Now,

therefore, be it
3

HCON 200 RDS

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),

3 That Congress hereby—

4 (1) recognizes the 19 members of the Armed

5 Forces who died in the terrorist truck bombing in

6 Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, on June 25, 1996, and hon7 ors them for their service and sacrifice;

8 (2) calls upon the Nation to hold fast the mem9 ory of those who died;

10 (3) extends its sympathies to the families of

11 those who died; and

12 (4) assures the members of the Armed Forces

13 serving anywhere in the world that their well-being

14 and interests will at all times be given the highest

15 priority.

Passed the House of Representatives September 24,

1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED DAVID LYNN RHODES,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D 16

- 3398 STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed December 5, 2017 Appea l from the Circuit Court for Marion County , Anthony M. Tatti , Judge. James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Allison A. Havens, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Rivero v. State , 35 So. 3d 183, 184-86 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) ; Sorey v. State , 419 So. 2d 810, 813 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

WALLIS , EDWARDS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
H. J. Res. 165

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

Joint Resolution

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1996, and for other

purposes.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law

104–99 is further amended by striking out ‘‘March 22, 1996’’ in

sections 106(c), 112, 126(c), 202(c) and 214 and inserting in lieu

thereof ‘‘March 29, 1996’’, and that Public Law 104–92 is further

amended by striking out ‘‘March 22, 1996’’ in section 106(c) and

inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘April 3, 1996’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John V. Woodard, Appellant.

[803 NYS2d 776]

Spain, J.

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the County Court of Franklin County (Main, Jr., J.), entered September 29, 2004, which denied defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 and 440.20 to vacate the judgment convicting him of conspiracy in the second degree and to set aside the sentence, without a hearing.

Defendant pleaded guilty to conspiracy in the second degree in connection with his involvement in a murder for hire scheme. As part of the plea, he waived his right to appeal except with respect to the sentence. County Court agreed not to impose a sentence of greater than 5 to 15 years in prison and ultimately sentenced defendant to a 4 to 12-year prison term. On direct appeal, this Court declined to disturb the sentence as harsh and excessive (263 AD2d 682 [1999], *lv denied*93 NY2d 1029 [1999]). Raising numerous contentions, defendant thereafter moved pursuant to CPL 440.10 and 440.20 seeking to vacate the judgment of conviction or, alternatively, to set aside the sentence. In a thorough and lengthy written decision, County Court denied *772the motion without a hearing and this Court granted defendant permission to appeal.

Defendant’s sole assertion on this appeal is that County Court erroneously denied his postverdict motion without a hearing, asserting entitlement to a hearing on his claim that his incriminating statements to police had been coerced and he was denied the effective assistance of counsel by his attorney’s failure to request a *Huntley*hearing. We note that defendant’s affidavit, the sole proof submitted in support of his motion, contained only conclusory generic allegations concerning his statements and counsel’s failure to move to suppress them. Pursuant to CPL 440.30 (4) (d), a court need not conduct a hearing where “[a]n allegation of fact essential to support the motion (i) . . . is made solely by the defendant and is unsupported by any other affidavit or evidence, and (ii) under these and all the other circumstances attending the case, there is no reasonable possibility that such allegation is true.” In view of the paucity of defendant’s affidavit and the lack of other proof supporting the conclusion that suppression of the incriminating statements was warranted or that defense counsel provided inadequate representation, we find that County Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying defendant’s motion without a hearing (see *People v Sayles,*17 AD3d 924, 925 [2005], *lv denied*5 NY3d 794 [2005]; *People v Aiken,*186 AD2d 897, 898 [1992]).

Cardona, P.J., Peters, Carpinello and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 150 (Thursday, August 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 39284]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18850]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Research Service


Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive License

AGENCY: Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to OSPREY 
BIOTECHNICS, INC. of SARASOTA, FLORIDA an exclusive license to U.S. 
Patent Application Serial No. 11/901,547, ``COMPOSITION OF 
ENTOMOPATHOGENIC FUNGUS AND METHOD OF PRODUCTION AND APPLICATION FOR 
INSECT CONTROL'', filed on September 13, 2007.

DATES: Comments must be received by September 8, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 
5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Rm. 4-1174, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-5131.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: June Blalock of the Office of 
Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 
301-504-5989.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Government's patent rights in 
this invention are assigned to the United States of America, as 
represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public 
interest to so license this invention as OSPREY BIOTECHNICS, INC. of 
SARASOTA, FLORIDA has submitted a complete and sufficient application 
for a license. The prospective exclusive license will be royalty-
bearing and will comply with the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 
and 37 CFR 404.7. The prospective exclusive license may be granted 
unless, within thirty (30) days from the date of this published Notice, 
the Agricultural Research Service receives written evidence and 
argument which establishes that the grant of the license would not be 
consistent with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.

Richard J. Brenner,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. E9-18850 Filed 8-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-03-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR DECEMBER 31, 1998 (UNAUDITED) AND THE
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 (UNAUDITED)
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,355
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                99,733
<PP&E>                                       2,956,092
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (40,760)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,015,065
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          320,170
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     369,895
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,015,065
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,555
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               196,958
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,706
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (203,109)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (203,109)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.09)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 (the
Form 10-Q), of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:
May 2, 2017



By:

/s/ Jochen E. TilkJochen E. TilkPresident and Chief Executive Officer


Date: May 2, 2017



By:

/s/ Wayne R. BrownleeWayne R. BrownleeExecutive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to
Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K, Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and,
accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

January 18, 2011

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with the Engine Manufacturers Association (EMA)

FROM: Angela Cullen

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0162

This memorandum documents a meeting held on Tuesday, January 18, 2011 between EMA, 

NHTSA and EPA and included the following individuals:

EMA: Tim Blubaugh - EMA, Jed Mandel – EMA, Tony Cook – Navistar, Patrick 

Charbonneau – Navistar, David Kayes – Daimler, Dan Kieffer – PACCAR, Margaret 

Sullivan – PACCAR, Brian Mormino - Cummins, Jackie Yeager – Cummins, Tony

Greszler – Volvo, Marc Miller – Volvo, Brian Burton – Daimler, Tom Sloane –

PACCAR, Jack Gehring – Caterpillar, Don Keski-Hynnila – Detroit Diesel

NHTSA/DOT: James Tamm, Maurice Hicks, Coralie Cooper

EPA: Byron Bunker, Chuck Moulis, and Angela Cullen

The discussion focused on vehicle certification process; tractor and vocational vehicle 

definitions; vehicle speed limiters; determination of aerodynamic performance; credit fungibility; 

tire warranty; small business exemptions; innovative credits; and deterioration factors.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          99,087
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  353,456
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (6,486)
<INVENTORY>                                    345,395
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               825,909
<PP&E>                                       3,566,311
<DEPRECIATION>                               (591,583)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,435,702
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          477,146
<BONDS>                                      1,270,718
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,206,125
<OTHER-SE>                                     900,514
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,435,702
<SALES>                                      1,141,482
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,141,482
<CGS>                                          842,303
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  842,303
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                53,952
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,378
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                207,849
<INCOME-TAX>                                    54,504
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            153,345
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   153,345
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.01
        

</TABLE>
#### § 1.907(e)-1 [Reserved]
39628.

#### BOWEN v. TOWN FINANCE CORPORATION et al.

Hall, Judge.

The defendant (plaintiff in error) assigns error on a judgment denying a traverse of service and motion to set aside a default judgment against him. The return of *327service traversed was as follows: “Georgia, Fulton County. I have this day served the defendant William Bowen Jr. 86 Gammon by leaving a copy of the action and summons at his most notorious place of abode in this County, Delivered same into hands of Willie Mae Guilin, a Inmate (colored) person, described as follows: Age, about 22 years; weight, about 105 pounds; height, about 5 feet and 4 inches, domiciled at the residence of defendant. This 8-15-61 /s/ James H. Pirkle, Deputy Marshal.” *Held:*

“The procedural rules of the Civil Court of Fulton County were created by statute and where such rules depart from those prescribed for the courts of general jurisdiction, the statutory enactments for the civil court will prevail, and the mode of procedure used in the superior court is inapplicable.” *Washington Nat. Ins. Co. v. Edwards,*102 Ga. App. 381, 382 (116 SE2d 514). The act of 1913, as amended, established the basic procedural rules for the Civil Court of Fulton County. Ga. L. 1913, p. 145. Section 36 of said act provides: “Such summons and copy shall be served by the marshal, or his deputy, by delivering a copy thereof to the defendant, or by leaving such copy with some person more than eighteen years old domiciled at the residence of the defendant; and the marshal, or his deputy, as the case may be, shall make return of service, stating the method thereof; and, where personal service is not made, the marshal or his deputy, as the case may be, shall state the place where summons was left, with a brief description of the person with whom it Was left, giving the name of such person if possible.”

The defendant did not deny that he resided at the address stated in the return of service. The conflict in the evidence, both as to whether the process was left at that residence and whether it was delivered into the hands of the person identified by the marshal, who the evidence showed lived at the residence, was resolved by the trial .judge by finding that there was proper service, which he was authorized to do. *Perry v. Lowry Co.,*31 Ga. App. 91 (119 SE 462); *Cooper v. Fourth Nat. Bank of Atlanta,*26 Ga. App. 44 (105 SE 375), affirmed, 152 Ga. 599 (110 SE 723).

In view of the above decision it is unnecessary to decide whether the judge erred in finding that the traverse was not filed within the time prescribed by law.

*328Decided July 13, 1962.

*Cassandra E. Maxwell,*for plaintiff in error.

*Wotton, Long, Jones & Read, Charles D. Read, Jr., Harold Sheats,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Felton, C. J., and Bell, J., concur.*
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
 
**Title:****Louisiana, Morgan City to PortAllen, including the Atchafalaya River
 
 
**Year
**jpg
**pdf
**jpg
**pdf
** 
 
 
 
 
**1974
11354-8p0
11354-8p0
11354-8p1
11354-8p1
** 
11354-9p0
11354-9p0
11354-9p1
11354-9p1
** 
 
 
 
 
**1975
11354-8p0

11354-8p0

11354-8p1
11354-8p1
** 
11354-9p0
11354-9p0
11354-9p1
11354-9p1
** 
 
 
 
 
**1976
11354-6p0

11354-6p0

11354-6p1
11354-6p1
** 
11354-9p0
11354-9p0
11354-9p1
11354-9p1
** 
 
 
 
 
**1977
11354-7p0

11354-7p0

11354-7p1
11354-7p1
** 
11354-9p0
11354-9p0
11354-9p1
11354-9p1
** 
 
 
 
 
**1978
11354-7p0

11354-7p0

11354-7p1
11354-7p1
** 
11354-9p0
11354-9p0
11354-9p1
11354-9p1
** 
 
 
 
 
**1979
11354-7p0

11354-7p0

11354-7p1
11354-7p1
** 
11354-9p0
11354-9p0
11354-9p1
11354-9p1
** 
 
 
 
 
**1980
11354-7p0

11354-7p0

11354-7p1
11354-7p1
** 
11354-8p0
11354-8p0
11354-9p1
11354-9p1
** 
 
 
 
 
**1981
11354-7p0

11354-7p0

11354-7p1
11354-7p1
** 
11354-9p0
11354-9p0
11354-9p1
11354-9p1
** 
 
 
 
 
**1982
11354-8p0

11354-8p0

11354-8p1
11354-8p1
** 
11354-9p0
11354-9p0
11354-9p1
11354-9p1
 
 
 
 
SuDoc Number:C 55.418/7:11354/
Item Number:0191-B-13 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000921445
 
December 19, 2017******************************************************************
|                                      |
|--------------------------------------|
|                                      |  |
| Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas | BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware |
| As Indenture Trustee                 | As Owner Trustee |
| Attn:  Michelle H.Y. Voon  | Attn: Robert Castle / Kristine Gullo |
| 100 Plaza One 6th Floor         | 301 Bellevue Parkway, 3rd Floor |
| Jersey City, NJ 07311                | Wilmington, DE 19809 |

|                                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                                 |  |
| The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. | Ally Auto Assets LLC |
| Attn:  Diane Moser                    | Ally Financial Inc. |
| 2 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1020              | 500 Woodward Ave |
| Chicago, IL  60602                    | Mail code:  MI-01-20-TRES |
|                                            | Detroit, MI 48226 |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| Re:    | Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2016-1 |
|   | Annual Statement as to Compliance |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| a. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period of January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018, and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under his supervision, and |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| b. | To the best of his knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement throughout such period. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | Very truly yours, |
|   |   |
|   | /s/ David J. DeBrunner |   |
|   | David J. DeBrunner |
|   | Vice President, Controller & Chief Accounting Officer |
|   |   |