alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Properties III
L.P. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 29, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David Salzman, Chief Executive Officer of Richman Housing Credits Inc.,
general partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties III L.P., general partner of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S)
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



/s/ David Salzman
-------------------------------------
David Salzman
Chief Executive Officer of
Richman Housing Credits Inc.,
general partner of
Richman Tax Credit Properties III L.P.,
general partner of the Company
August 13, 2002
§ 41.4482(c)-1 Definition of State, taxable period, use, and customarily used. ( a ) *State. State* includes any State, any political subdivision of a State, the District of Columbia, and, to the extent provided by section 7871, any Indian tribal government.
( b ) *Taxable period.* For the definition of *taxable period,* see section 4482(c).
( c ) *Use.* The term “use”, as used in the regulations in this part with reference to a highway motor vehicle, means the use of the highway motor vehicle on the public highways in the United States, that is, operation of the vehicle, by means of its own motor, on any roadway (whether a Federal highway, State highway, city street, or otherwise) in the United States which is not a private roadway. Thus, for purposes of the tax, there is no use of a highway motor vehicle while the vehicle is in “dead storage”. The term “use” does not include operation of a new highway motor vehicle on a public highway in the United States if such operation is merely for the purpose of transporting the vehicle from the point of manufacture or assembly to the consumer, whether direct or with intermediate deliveries to such points as are involved in the distribution process. For example, operation of a new vehicle for the purpose of delivering it from the factory to a branch establishment of the manufacturer, or from the factory or branch establishment to a dealer, distributor, or consumer, does not constitute use of the vehicle within the meaning of the regulations in this part; likewise, the further operation of the vehicle by a dealer or distributor for the purpose of delivering the vehicle to a consumer does not constitute use of the vehicle. Similarly, the operation of a secondhand highway motor vehicle by a dealer or distributor for the purpose of delivering the vehicle to a purchaser does not constitute use of the vehicle within the meaning of the regulations in this part. Furthermore, the term “use” does not include operation of a new or secondhand highway motor vehicle, if such operation is exclusively for the purpose of demonstration of the vehicle by a dealer in, or distributor of, new or secondhand highway motor vehicles. Operation of a highway motor vehicle on a private roadway, or other private property, does not constitute use of the vehicle within the meaning of the regulations in this part.
( d ) *Customarily used.* A semitrailer or trailer is treated as *customarily used* in connection with a highway motor vehicle if the vehicle is equipped to tow the semitrailer or trailer.
[T.D. 7409, 41 FR 9877, Mar. 8, 1976, as amended by T.D. 7505, 42 FR 42856, Aug. 25, 1977; T.D. 8027, 50 FR 21248, May 23, 1985; T.D. 8159, 52 FR 33584, Sept. 4, 1987; T.D. 8879, 65 FR 17154, Mar. 31, 2000]
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Fl  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2016, by andamong SG COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, LLC, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, asSpecial Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as CertificateAdministrator, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee and PARKBRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and as Asset RepresentationsReviewer with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series2016-C5 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein nototherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.  A review of theactivities of the  Servicer during the period from July 1, 2016 throughDecember 31, 2016,  and of its performance per the Agreement during suchperiod has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2.  To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the periodJuly 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016.

 

 

 

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President 

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
§ 20.7701-1 Tax return preparer. ( a ) *In general.* For the definition of a tax return preparer, see § 301.7701-15 of this chapter.
( b ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section is applicable to returns and claims for refund filed, and advice provided, after December 31, 2008.
[T.D. 9436, 73 FR 78451, Dec. 22, 2008]
IA

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 180

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to abolish

the Electoral College and to provide for the direct election of the President and Vice President of the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 12, 1996

Mr. CAMPBELL (for himself and Mr. JACOBS) introduced the following joint

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States to abolish the Electoral College and to provide

for the direct election of the President and Vice President of the United States.

1 Resolved, by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the follow4 ing article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitu5 tion of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents

6 and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by

7 the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States with-
2

HJ 180 IH

1 in seven years after the date of its submission for ratifica2 tion:

3 ‘‘ARTICLE —

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. The President and Vice President shall

5 be elected by the people of the several States and the dis6 trict constituting the seat of government of the United

7 States.

8 ‘‘SECTION 2. The electors in each State shall have

9 the qualifications requisite for electors of the most popu10 lous branch of the legislature of the State; although Con11 gress may establish uniform age qualifications.

12 ‘‘SECTION 3. Each elector shall cast a single vote for

13 two persons who have consented to the joining of their

14 names as candidates for President and Vice President. No

15 elector shall be prohibited from casting a vote for a can16 didate for President or Vice President because either can17 didate, or both, are inhabitants of the same State as the

18 elector.

19 ‘‘SECTION 4. The pair of candidates having the great20 est number of votes for President and Vice President shall

21 be elected, if such number be at least 50 percent of the

22 whole number of votes cast for such offices. If no pair

23 of candidates has such number, a runoff election shall be

24 held in which the choice of President and Vice President

25 shall be made from the two pairs of candidates who re-
3

HJ 180 IH

1 ceived the greatest numbers of votes cast in the election

2 nationally.

3 ‘‘SECTION 5. The times, places, and manner of hold4 ing such elections and entitlement to inclusion on the bal5 lot shall be determined by Congress.

6 ‘‘SECTION 6. The Congress may by law provide for

7 the case of the death or any other disqualification of any

8 candidate for President or Vice President before the day

9 on which the President-elect or Vice President-elect has

10 been chosen; and for the case of a tie in any election.

11 ‘‘SECTION 7. This article shall take effect one year

12 after the first day of January following ratification.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Properties III
L.P. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 29, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, David Salzman, Chief Executive Officer of Richman Housing Credits
Inc., general partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties III L.P., general partner
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to
(S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ David Salzman
----------------------------------
David Salzman
Chief Executive Officer of Richman
Housing Credits Inc., general partner of
Richman Tax Credit Properties III L.P.,
general partner of the Company
February 13, 2003
Exhibit 35.7



|     |  |  |  |                                                                                                                        
|---- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  |  |  | Corporate Trust Services 
MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road Columbia, MD 21045 
Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380

Citibank, National Association

388 Greenwich Street

14th Floor

New York, New York 10013



|Re: | Annual Statement of Compliance for Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2016-C30 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series
2016-C30
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2016 (the
Agreement), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator (Wells Fargo), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the
Reporting Period):

(a)    A review of Wells Fargos activities during the Reporting Period and of its
performance under the Agreement has been made under such officers supervision; and

(b)    To the best of such
officers knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

March 1, 2017



|              
|--------------
|LOGO          
|BRIAN SMITH   
|Vice President



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
# AN ---·-- PROJECT: laxSite Designation Survey{Fall '10) Environmental Consulting. Inc. 

## Chain-of-Custody



# - Sample Sample Sample Sample Numberof Analyses Station ID Date Time Matrix Containers Containers Requested JAX-Fa10-N05-WC-AT 09/17/10 14:12 Water amber glass, plastic 7 see attached JAX-Fa10-N05-WC-BT 09/17/10 14:10 Water amberglass, plastic 7 see attached JAX-Fa10-N09-WC-AT 09/15/10 10:29 Water amber glass, plastic 7 see attached JAX-Fa10-N09-WC-BT 09/15/10 10:27 Water amberglass, plastic 7 see attached JAX-Fa10-N10-WC-AT 09/15/10 10:30 Water amberglass, plastic 7 see attached JAX-Fa10-S02-WC-AT 09/16/10 10:45 Water amber glass, plastic 7 see attached JAX-Fa10-S02-WC-BT 09/16/10 10:42 Water amber glass, plastic 7 see attached JAX-Fa10-S04-WC-AT 09/15/10 14:18 Water amberglass, plastic 14 see attached JAX-Fa10-S04-WC-BT 09/15/10 14:16 Water amberglass, j?lastic 7 see attached



### ,_



# -

-

# J-1''-~~o**o~ t~--**  Vfr-**~ ~~** **1'-14~** Samples Relinquished by: ____ Received by: __ _ Date: __ _ Time: ___ _ Date: Time: ___ _ Samples Relinquished by: Received by: Date: __ Time: ___ _ Date: Time: Samples Relinquished by: Received by: Date: ___ _ Time: Date: ____ _ Time: Lab Sample ID Comments

Collected extra waterforQC



### ANAMAR Environmental Consulting, Inc. 2106 NW 67th Place, Suite 5 Gainesville, FL 32653 (352) 377-5770 FAX (352) 378-1500 

## en
§ 300.11 Fee for obtaining a preparer tax identification number. ( a ) *Applicability.* This section applies to the application for and renewal of a preparer tax identification number pursuant to 26 CFR 1.6109-2(d).
( b ) *Fee.* The fee to apply for or renew a preparer tax identification number is $11 per year and is in addition to the fee charged by the contractor.
( c ) *Person liable for the fee.* The individual liable for the application or renewal fee is the individual applying for and renewing a preparer tax identification number from the IRS.
( d ) *Applicability date.* This section applies to applications for or renewal of a preparer tax identification number filed on or after October 19, 2023.
[T.D. 9503, 75 FR 60321, Sept. 30, 2010. Redesignated at T.D. 9523, 76 FR 21807, Apr. 19, 2011, and further redesignated by T.D. 9559, 76 FR 72623, Nov. 25, 2011; T.D. 9742, 80 FR 66794, Oct. 30, 2015; T.D. 9781, 81 FR 52767, Aug. 10, 2016. Redesignated at 84 FR 20804, May 13, 2019. T.D. 9903, 85 FR 43436, July 17, 2020. Redesignated by T.D. 9962 at 87 FR 11297, Mar. 1, 2022; T.D. 9980, 88 FR 68459, Oct. 4, 2023]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 10 Introduced in House (IH)]

                                     

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 10

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                        regarding school prayer.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

   Mr. Solomon introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                        regarding school prayer.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Nothing in this constitution shall prohibit the inclusion of 
voluntary prayer in any public school program or activity. No person 
shall be coerced by the United States or by any State to participate in 
such prayer. Neither the United States nor any State shall prescribe 
the content of any such prayer.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Krupp Government Income Trust (the
"Trust") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter
F. Donovan, Chief Executive Officer of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Trust as of June 30, 2004 (the last date of the period
            covered by the Report).


/s/ Peter F. Donovan
--------------------
Peter F. Donovan,
Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 13, 2004


                                      -17-
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22
- 6305
(CHIEF) COL. MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER

- GORBEY , Petitioner

– Appellant ,

v. WARDEN, FCI Beckley , Respondent

– Appel lee

.

No. 22
- 6390
(CHIEF) COL. MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER

- GORBEY , Petitioner

– Appellant ,

v. WARDEN, FCI Beckley , Respondent

– Appellee

.

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia , at Beckley

. Frank W. Volk , District Judge. ( 5:2 1

- cv - 00583 )

Submitted : June 27, 2023 Decided: July 10, 2023 USCA4 Appeal: 22-6305 Doc: 13 Filed: 07/10/2023 Pg: 1 of 42 Before KING , AGEE, and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Michael S. Owlfeather

- Gorbey , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6305 Doc: 13 Filed: 07/10/2023 Pg: 2 of 43 PER CURIAM: (Chief) Col. Michael S. Owlfeather

- Gorbey, a District of Columbia offender , seeks to appeal the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, and denying reconsideration. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A); Madley v. U.S. Parole Comm’n , 278 F.3d 1306, 1310 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (D.C. cou rts are “state courts for purposes of this statute”); cf. In re Wright , 826 F.3d 774, 783 (4th Cir. 2016) (“when a prisoner being held ‘pursuant to the judgment of a State court’ files a habeas petition claiming the execution of his sentence is in violatio n of the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States, the more specific § 2254 ‘and all associated statutory requirements’ shall apply, regardless of the statutory label the prisoner chooses to give his petition”). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find th e district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis , 580 U.S. 100, 115

- 17 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134,
140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Owlfeather

- Gorbey has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability USCA4 Appeal: 22-6305 Doc: 13 Filed: 07/10/2023 Pg: 3 of 44 and dismiss the appeals. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma terials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 22-6305 Doc: 13 Filed: 07/10/2023 Pg: 4 of 4
#### § 1.672(c)-1 Related or subordinate party.

Section 672(c) defines the term “related or subordinate party”. The term, as used in sections 674(c) and 675(3), means any nonadverse party who is the grantor's spouse if living with the grantor; the grantor's father, mother, issue, brother or sister; an employee of the grantor; a corporation or any employee of a corporation in which the stock holdings of the grantor and the trust are significant from the viewpoint of voting control; or a subordinate employee of a corporation in which the grantor is an executive. For purposes of sections 674(c) and 675(3), these persons are presumed to be subservient to the grantor in respect of the exercise or nonexercise of the powers conferred on them unless shown not to be subservient by a preponderance of the evidence.