alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 12

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States limiting

the number of consecutive terms for Members of the House of Representatives and the Senate.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. SOLOMON introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States limiting the number of consecutive terms for

Members of the House of Representatives and the

Senate.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several
2

•HJ 12 IH

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission

2 by the Congress:

3 ‘‘ARTICLE—

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. A person may not serve any portion of

5 a term as a Representative if the person has served as

6 a Representative for more than one year of each of the

7 six terms that immediately precede the term.

8 ‘‘SECTION 2. A person may not serve any portion of

9 a term as a Senator if the person has served as a Senator

10 for more than three years of each of the two terms that

11 immediately precede the term.

12 ‘‘SECTION 3. This article shall not prevent a person

13 who is serving any portion of a term as a Representative

14 or Senator on the date of the ratification of this article

15 from serving the remainder of the term.’’.

Æ
#### In the Matter of Albert A. Belbol, Respondent, v Rachel Stevenson, Also Known as Rachel Nau, Appellant.

[805 NYS2d 90]

In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Marks, J.), dated September 1, 2004, which, without a hearing, denied her application to modify a prior order of the same court (Koenig, J.), dated April 21, 2001, awarding custody of the subject child.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly denied, without a hearing, the mother’s application to modify a prior order of the same court (Koenig, J.), dated April 21, 2001, awarding custody of the subject child *(see Matter of Carpenter v Whitaker,*5 AD3d 681 [2004]; *Engeldrum v Engeldrum,*306 AD2d 242 [2003]; *Matter of Johnson v Semple,*273 AD2d 311 [2000]; *cf. Matter of Dow v Dow,*306 AD2d 529 [2003]; *Granata v Granata,*289 AD2d 527 [2001]). The mother contends that her relocation to North Carolina was a change of circumstances warranting a hearing. However, while the present custody order provides that the parties shall have joint custody of the child, it states that the child shall reside with the father. Custody should be established on a long-term basis whenever possible *(see Obey v Degling,*37 NY2d 768 [1975]) and the mother presented no evidence that the child’s best interests would be served by relocating with him to North Carolina *(see Matter of Tropea v Tropea,*87 NY2d 727 [1996]). Adams, J.P., Luciano, Mastro and Lunn, JJ., concur.
#### Thomas ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James ANDERSON; Patricia Anderson, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-15537.

D.C. No. CV-98-00744-DWH/RAM.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*318Submitted June 10, 2002.*

Decided June 13, 2002.

Before O’SCANNLAIN, BERZON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Thomas Anderson appeals pro se the district court’s order dismissing his diversity action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, *Breitman v. May Co. California,*37 F.3d 562, 563 (9th Cir.1994), and for clear error the district court’s factual determinations relating to the existence of diversity jurisdiction, *Prudential Real Estate Affiliates v. PPR Realty, Inc.,*204 F.3d 867, 872-73 (9th Cir. 2000). We affirm.

The district court’s factual finding that Patricia Anderson was domiciled in Oregon at the time this action commenced is not clearly erroneous. *See Fisher v. Roe,*263 F.3d 906, 912 (9th Cir.2001). Consequently, dismissal was proper because Appellant failed to establish that complete diversity existed. *See Lew v. Moss,*797 F.2d 747, 749 (9th Cir.1986).

Appellant’s remaining contentions lack merit.

We deny all outstanding motions.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### § 25.2702-0 Table of contents.

This section lists the major paragraphs contained in §§ 25.2702-1 through 25.2702-7.

## § 25.2702-1 Special valuation rules in the case of transfers of interests in trust.

(a) Scope of section 2702.

(b) Effect of section 2702.

(c) Exceptions to section 2702.

(1) Incomplete gift.

(2) Personal residence trust.

(3) Charitable remainder trust.

(4) Pooled income fund.

(5) Charitable lead trust.

(6) Certain assignments of remainder interests.

(7) Certain property settlements.

## § 25.2702-2 Definitions and valuation rules.

(a) Definitions.

(1) Member of the family.

(2) Transfer in trust.

(3) Retained.

(4) Interest.

(5) Holder.

(6) Qualified interest.

(7) Qualified annuity interest.

(8) Qualified unitrust interest.

(9) Qualified remainder interest.

(10) Governing instrument.

(b) Valuation of retained interests.

(1) In general.

(2) Qualified interest.

(c) Valuation of a term interest in certain tangible property.

(1) In general.

(2) Tangible property subject to rule.

(3) Evidence of value of property.

(4) Conversion of property.

(5) Additions or improvements to property.

(d) Examples.

## § 25.2702-3 Qualified interests.

(a) In general.

(b) Special rules for qualified annuity interests.

(1) Payment of annuity amount.

(2) Incorrect valuations of trust property.

(3) Computation of annuity amount in certain circumstances.

(4) Additional contributions prohibited.

(c) Special rules for qualified unitrust interests.

(1) Payment of unitrust amount.

(2) Incorrect valuations of trust property.

(3) Computation of unitrust amount in certain circumstances.

(d) Requirements applicable to qualified annuity interests and qualified unitrust interests.

(1) In general.

(2) Contingencies.

(3) Amounts payable to other persons.

(4) Term of the annuity or unitrust interest.

(5) Commutation.

(6) Use of debt obligations to satisfy the annuity or unitrust payment obligation.

(e) Examples.

(f) Qualified remainder interest.

(1) Requirements.

(2) Remainder interest.

(3) Examples.

## § 25.2702-4 Certain property treated as held in trust.

(a) In general.

(b) Leases.

(c) Joint purchases.

(d) Examples.

## § 25.2702-5 Personal residence trusts.

(a) In general.

(b) Personal residence trust.

(1) In general.

(2) Personal residence.

(3) Qualified proceeds.

(c) Qualified personal residence trust.

(1) In genera1.

(2) Personal residence.

(3) Income of the trust.

(4) Distributions from the trust to other persons.

(5) Assets of the trust.

(6) Commutation.

(7) Cessation of use as a personal residence.

(8) Disposition of trust assets on cessation as qualified personal residence trust.

(d) Examples.

## § 25.2702-6 Reduction in taxable gifts.

(a) Transfers of retained interests in trust.

(1) Inter vivos transfers.

(2) Testamentary transfers.

(3) Gift splitting.

(b) Amount of reduction.

(1) In general.

(2) Treatment of annual exclusion.

(3) Overlap with section 2001.

(c) Examples.

## § 25.2702-7 Effective dates.

[T.D. 6334, 23 FR 8904, Nov. 15, 1958; 25 FR 14021, Dec. 31, 1960, as amended by T.D. 9181, 70 FR 9223, Feb. 25, 2005]
#### TRW, INC., and TRW Datacom International, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. SAIT ELECTRONICS, S.A., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 84-6633.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Sept. 24, 1986.

Anne H. Egerton, Jeffrey Weinberger, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Macklin Fleming, D.W. Hunt, Los Ange-les, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Before ANDERSON, FARRIS and NELSON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This panel, after much deliberation, has concluded that principles of comity dictate that we withdraw submission of this case for decision pending a final decision of the Belgian courts in litigation pending therein *905between the same parties and involving issues of crucial importance to this case.

Unless it will violate some positive rule of law, or canon of professional or judicial ethics, the parties hereto, through counsel, shall jointly advise the Belgian Court of the entry of this deferral order and of the contents thereof.

This deferral shall be for a reasonable period of time, not to exceed 150 days. Within this deferral period and upon the conclusion thereof, counsel for the parties shall promptly and jointly advise this court of any events that may affect the continuation of this deferral.

If, and when, the Belgian court renders a final decision in its pending litigation, the parties shall promptly forward certified, translated copies of that decision to this court for distribution to the panel.

Whether or not further briefing or oral argument will be entertained will be determined in a later order of this court.
§ 25.6065-1 Verification of returns. ( a ) *Penalties of perjury.* If a return, statement, or other document made under the provisions of Chapter 12 or Subtitle F of the Code or the regulations thereunder with respect to any tax imposed by Chapter 12 of the Code, or the form and instructions issued with respect to such return, statement, or other document, requires that it shall contain or be verified by a written declaration that it is made under the penalties of perjury, it must be so verified by the person or persons required to sign such return, statement, or other document. In addition, any other statement or document submitted under any provision of Chapter 12 or Subtitle F of the Code or regulations thereunder with respect to any tax imposed by Chapter 12 of the Code may be required to contain or be verified by a written declaration that it is made under the penalties of perjury.
( b ) *Oath.* Any return, statement, or other document required to be submitted under Chapter 12 or Subtitle F of the Code or regulations prescribed thereunder with respect to any tax imposed by Chapter 12 of the Code may be required to be verified by an oath.
[T.D. 6600, 27 FR 4987, May 29, 1962]
Page 1 of 1 

EPA’s Planned Proposed Rulemaking to Address the Process for Tribes to Obtain 

Treatment in a Similar Manner as States for the Clean Water Act Impaired Water Listing 

and Total Maximum Daily Load Program – Meeting with Environmental Chiefs from the 

National Association of Attorneys General 

 Thursday, May 28, 2015 

3:00 – 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time 

Meeting Summary 

EPA Moderator: Avi Garbow, EPA General Counsel 

EPA Presenter: James Curtin, EPA Office of General Counsel 

Participants: Representatives of over 40 states 

The topic of the planned proposed rulemaking to address the process for tribes to obtain 

treatment in a similar manner as states for the Clean Water Act (CWA) Impaired Water Listing 

and Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program was one of several on the agenda. A planned 

proposed rulemaking fact sheet (May 2015) of the same name was provided to invitees in 

advance of the meeting and is available in docket EPA-HQ-OW-2014-0622. 

James Curtin provided a brief overview of the planned proposed rulemaking. 

 

Participants raised no questions or issues.
§ 31.3402(r)-1 Withholding on distributions of Indian gaming profits to tribal members. ( a ) ( 1 ) *General rule.* Section 3402(r)(1) requires every person, including an Indian tribe, making a payment to a member of an Indian tribe from the net revenues of any class II or class III gaming activity, as defined in 25 U.S.C. 2703, conducted or licensed by such tribe to deduct and withhold from such payment a tax in an amount equal to such payment's proportionate share of the annualized tax, as that term is defined in section 3402(r)(3).
( 2 ) *Withholding tables.* Except as provided in paragraph (a)(4) of this section, the amount of a payment's proportionate share of the annualized tax shall be determined under the applicable table provided by the Commissioner.
( 3 ) *Annualized amount of payment.* Section 3402(r)(5) provides that payments shall be placed on an annualized basis under regulations prescribed by the Secretary. A payment may be placed on an annualized basis by multiplying the amount of the payment by the total number of payments to be made in a calendar year. For example, a monthly payment may be annualized by multiplying the amount of the payment by 12. Similarly, a quarterly payment may be annualized by multiplying the amount of the payment by 4.
( 4 ) *Alternate withholding procedures* — ( i ) *In general.* Any procedure for determining the amount to be deducted and withheld under section 3402(r) may be used, provided that the amount of tax deducted and withheld is substantially the same as it would be using the tables provided by the Commissioner under paragraph (a)(2) of this section. At the election of an Indian tribe, the amount to be deducted and withheld under section 3402(r) shall be determined in accordance with this alternate procedure.
( ii ) *Method of election.* It is sufficient for purposes of making an election under this paragraph (a)(4) that an Indian tribe evidence the election in any reasonable way, including use of a particular method. Thus, no written election is required.
( 5 ) *Additional withholding permitted.* Consistent with the provisions of section 3402(p), a tribal member and a tribe may enter into an agreement to provide for the deduction and withholding of additional amounts from payments in order to satisfy the anticipated tax liability of the tribal member. The agreement may be made in a manner similar to that described in § 31.3402(p)-1 (with respect to voluntary withholding agreements between employees and employers).
( b ) Effective date. This section applies to payments made after December 31, 1994.
[T.D. 8634, 60 FR 65238, Dec. 19, 1995]
§ 1.951A-7 Applicability dates. ( a ) *In general.* Except as otherwise provided in this section, sections 1.951A-1 through 1.951A-6 apply to taxable years of foreign corporations beginning after December 31, 2017, and to taxable years of United States shareholders in which or with which such taxable years of foreign corporations end.
( b ) *High-tax exception.* Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph (b), section 1.951A-2(c)(1)(iii), (c)(3)(ii), and (c)(7) and (8) apply to taxable years of foreign corporations beginning on or after July 23, 2020, and to taxable years of United States shareholders in which or with which such taxable years of foreign corporations end. In addition, taxpayers may choose to apply the rules in § 1.951A-2(c)(1)(iii), (c)(3)(ii), and (c)(7) and (8) to taxable years of foreign corporations that begin after December 31, 2017, and before July 23, 2020, and to taxable years of U.S. shareholders in which or with which such taxable years of the foreign corporations end, provided that they consistently apply those rules and the rules in § 1.954-1(c)(1)(iii)(A)( 3 ), § 1.954-1(c)(1)(iv), and the first sentence of § 1.954-1(d)(3)(i) to such taxable years. Section 1.951A-2(c)(7)(iii)(B), (c)(8)(ii), (c)(8)(iii)(A)( 2 )( ii ), and (c)(8)(iii)(B) apply to taxable years of foreign corporations beginning on or after December 28, 2021, and to taxable years of United States shareholders in which or with which such taxable years of the foreign corporations end. In addition, taxpayers may choose to apply the rules in § 1.951A-2(c)(7)(iii)(B), (c)(8)(iii)(A)( 2 )( ii ), and (c)(8)(iii)(B)( 2 )( iii ) to taxable years of foreign corporations that begin after December 31, 2019, and before December 28, 2021, and to taxable years of U.S. shareholders in which or with which such taxable years of the foreign corporations end. For taxable years of foreign corporations beginning before December 28, 2021, see § 1.951A-2(c)(7)(iii)(B), (c)(8)(iii)(A)( 2 )( ii ), and (c)(8)(iii)(B)( 2 )( iii ) as contained in 26 CFR part 1 revised as of April 1, 2021.
( c ) [Reserved]
( d ) *Deduction for disqualified payments.* Section 1.951A-2(c)(6) applies to taxable years of foreign corporations ending on or after April 7, 2020, and to taxable years of United States shareholders in which or with which such taxable years end.
[T.D. 9866, 84 FR 29341, June 21, 2019, as amended by T.D. 9902, 85 FR 44648, July 23, 2020; T.D. 9922, 85 FR 72070, Nov. 12, 2020; T.D. 9959, 87 FR 373, Jan. 4, 2022]
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.6103(k)(9)-1 Disclosure of returns and return information relating to payment of tax by credit card and debit card.

Officers and employees of the Internal Revenue Service may disclose to card issuers, financial institutions, or other persons such return information as the Commissioner deems necessary in connection with processing credit card and debit card transactions to effectuate payment of tax as authorized by § 301.6311-2. Officers and employees of the Internal Revenue Service may disclose such return information to such persons as the Commissioner deems necessary in connection with billing or collection of the amounts charged or debited, including resolution of errors relating to the credit card or debit card account as described in § 301.6311-2(d).

[T.D. 8969, 66 FR 64742, Dec. 14, 2001]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Baseball : the national pastimein the National Archives**
 
PDF| epub
 
SuDoc Number:AE 1.102:B 29
Item Number:0569-B-02 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000921234
 
December 27, 2017
Aleutian Pribilof Island Community Development Association 

234 Gold Street • Juneau, Alaska 99801 • (907) 586-0161 • Fax: (907) 586-0165 

717 K Street, Suite 100 • Anchorage, Alaska 99501 • (907) 929-5273 • Fax: (907) 929-5275 

October 27, 2012 

Mr. Dennis J. DeVany 

Chief EAS and Domestic Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington DC 20590 

Re: DOT Order# 2012-8-39 

APICDA comments on EAS proposal by Grant Aviation at Akun, Alaska 

Dear Mr. DeVany 

:·~., ·.·' :;~ •• : f 

}> 

--1:=! 

~~~~ fi]§EJ~ .__t'j 

Akutan is one of seven communities that make up Aleutian Pribilof Island Community Development 

Association {APICDA). As such, its ability to operate as a city with all components being fully functional is 

critical to our mission. Due to the City's isolation, it requires daily air service for the transport of 

residents, food, freight and mail. Further, air service is imperative to the survival of the community as 

water service is seldom the most efficient or secure manner of transportation. 

With Pen Air's announcement to discontinue service to Akutan, Grant Aviation's EAS proposal for air 

service to Akun Island is of great significance and we encourage the U.S. Department of Transportation 

to give the submission its full and immediate attention. APICDA fully supports Grant Aviation's proposal 

and is happy to be of any assistance that would help to expedite its institution. 

Sincerely, 

"") 

I 

Cc: Mr. Joe Bereskin, Mayor 

Mr. CJ Zane
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Fl  401 South Tryon Street.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2016, byand among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as General Master Servicer, C-III ASSETMANAGEMENT LLC, as General Special Servicer, NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BANK, N.A.,as NCB Master Servicer and as NCB Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Trustee and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as OperatingAdvisor and as Asset Representations Reviewer with respect to CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2016-C36 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.            A review of the activities of the General Master Servicer during the periodfrom November 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the “ReportingPeriod”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period hasbeen made under my supervision, and 

 

2.            To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the General Master Servicerhas fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all materialrespects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
Exhibit 12.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Pat Sek Yuen Chan, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to annual report on
Form 20-F/A of Borqs Technologies, Inc.; and



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|Date: December 18, 2020 | By: | /s/ Pat Sek Yuen Chan                                        
|----------------------- | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |     | Pat Sek Yuen Chan.                                           
|                        |     | Chief Executive Officer
        (Principal Executive Officer)