alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### R eg ulat o ry E Ya l uation D

ocke t No. FAA-



## 20 **N~ttt oo**  

## t.f- {J) D i r e ct o rat e Id c nti l i e r: -AD A dd t h e wo rk h o ur s . par is c ost . and 1wmh e r oj" U. S . r e giste red p r o du c ts totlu : ta hl e below. W lle u yo u ar e Jini. \ h e d. cli ck o n th e ·· uiu lat e Fi el d s·· 1m /loll l o

**aut**

**ic ol~r**  **ill** in th e total s . 

### U

p date Fie ld s Es timated Co s t s: Act i o n Cost s per Produ c t (e. g., air c rnfi , engine , (e . g. , I nsp ec ti o n , pr ope ll er , appl i ance) W

o rk
- ho u rs Lab or P a

11 s Co s t To t al Cos t s Numb er o f Tota l C o s t re placem ent) ( in c lu de co s t (l a bor + 

## u.s . f or U.S . Fl ee t Do 1 w 1 in clud e 011- co nditio 11 c os t s l n • r e a c ces s . te s tin g, ( @ $85 /h parts ) Re gis ter e d an d c los e - up) o ur) Pr o du c t s Rem ova l I 

### 40 00 

### 88 0 I n

s pec tio n 1.5 

# .. Rc plo c c m c nt 

### J .S 

# . , A rm /tet/1 ) •h· ·' 

## I.A 0 :l'l I

,, 

### ,, 'I'

**~** (1{1 Ill '•i l 0 I 1 1

o I

0 

## -·

I 

# ., " ' T h e k no w n num be r o f" prod u c t s in co mplian ce: N u mb e r T o tnl C os t s o f co m p l ianc e l o r U . S. fleet : S 3 5 9 , 48 0 C os t s cove re d under w a r ra nt y 

## (if k n own ) s\Va r rall l \ O n-C o n d iti o n C os t s : • Ac ti o n W or k
- h

o u

r s L a

bor cos t P an s Cos t Cos t per P rod uc t ( \! . g .. I n sp ec ti on. ( in c lu cie ac ce s s . < (cil S 8 5 / hour) te s tin g . and clo se · repla c emen t) up) l ,, ' I


### - -- L_S p ec i a l con s id c nttion s for Eco n o mi c Anal ys i s rU se thi s .fi e ld t o e xplain anything in th e £ vtimat cd Cos t s ta b l e that wa s a s sullu : d ur might 1101 he o h1·io u s . Tllisfldd can al so be 1/ .'ie

d to explain warranty co st s) : E xecutive Ordc t· 12866: 

### Could the AD be co n sidered a "significant regu l atory acti o n" ? . YES* 0 NO 

### I8J *Exp l anat ion: DOT Regulatory Policie s a nd Pmccdur·c s: 

### Is th e A D sig nifi ca nt ?



# ~ YES* 

### 0 NO 

### I8J * Exp l ana ti on: Reg ulator y F l ex ibili ty Act: 

### W

ill th e AD ha ve a s i g nilicant economic i mpa ct o n a s ub stantial numb e r of s mall entiti es? Ex pl ain for ei th er 

### a Y es or No an swe r . 

# 0 YES 

### 0 NO 

### 181 Ex pl an at i on : Intrastate Aviatio n in Ala s l m: 

### T hi s AD c o uld affect i ntra s tate aviatio n in Al a

s k

a. I s it appro priate to i nclud e specific requirement s for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation m ight be the on l y m o de of tran spo rtati on? • Y ES* 0 NO 

### r8J * Explanatio n :
39485.

#### BUTLER v. NATIONAL LEAD COMPANY.

Decided June 18, 1962.

*181*Grace W. Thomas,*for plaintiff in error.

*Benj. B. Blackbv/rn, III, Woodruff, Latimer, Saveli, Lane & Williams, John M. Williams,*contra.

Jordan, Judge.

“Where a claim before the State Board of Workmen’s Compensation involves a question of whether the employee is disabled as the result of an occupational disease, the sole jurisdiction to decide this medical issue lies with the Medical Board, and the only jurisdiction of the Board of Workmen’s Compensation is to enter an award in conformity therewith. *Code Ann.*§ 114-819; *Griffith v. Employers Mutual Liability Ins. Co.,*100 Ga. App. 157 (110 SE2d 539). The findings of the Medical Board are conclusive and not reviewable unless an appeal is made directly therefrom on statutory grounds. *Code Ann.*§ 114-823 (5); *Borden Co. v. Fuerlinger,*95 Ga. App. 556 (1) (98 SE2d 410).” *Farrill v. Travelers Ins. Co.,*105 Ga. App. 600 (125 SE2d 562).

The record in this case does not show that the members of the Medical Board acted without and in excess of their powers in making the instant decision or that said decision was contrary to law or that there was not sufficient competent evidence to support said decision, the three statutory grounds of appeal relied upon by the claimant in this case. To the contrary, the *182record shows that the Medical Board made a very thorough and exhaustive study of this case, heard testimony from eminent medical authorities in this field, and had available to them the results of the usual tests conducted to determine the presence of lead poisoning in a human being. The Medical Board after its second hearing in the matter said, “The board has stated in a previous opinion that they could not establish lead poisoning in Butler from a medical viewpoint; yet, the board would not go so far as to say that Butler may not have a masked case of lead poisoning. Perhaps his condition might have become obscured by treatment, and other influences which we do not know about; yet hematologically and chemically, lead poisoning in Butler cannot be substantiated.” The report went on to say, “. . . if a diagnosis of lead poisoning was made in his case, it would have to be made purely on the fact that he had worked in a lead industry where he was exposed and nothing more.”

Thus, the medical issue in this case has been decided against the claimant by the only tribunal having jurisdiction to decide the issue. There is ample evidence in the record to support the conclusion reached by the Medical Board.

Accordingly, the Superior Court of Fulton County did not err in affirming the award of the State Board of Workmen’s Compensation, denying the claim.

*<Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Frankum, J., concur.*
§ 25.6694-3 Penalty for understatement due to willful, reckless, or intentional conduct. ( a ) *In general.* A person who is a tax return preparer of any return or claim for refund of gift tax under chapter 12 of subtitle B of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) shall be subject to penalties under section 6694(b) of the Code in the manner stated in § 1.6694-3 of this chapter.
( b ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section is applicable to returns and claims for refund filed, and advice provided, after December 31, 2008.
[T.D. 9436, 73 FR 78452, Dec. 22, 2008]
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 130

To amend paragraphs 2 and 3 of Rule XXV

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 1 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Mr. MITCHELL submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

To amend paragraphs 2 and 3 of Rule XXV

1 Resolved, that paragraph 2 of Rule XXV of the

2 Standing Rules of the Senate is amended for the One

3 Hundred Third Congress as follows:

4 (1) Strike ‘‘20’’ after ‘‘Armed Services’’ and in5 sert in lieu thereof ‘‘22’’.

6 (2) Strike ‘‘19’’ after ‘‘Foreign Relations’’ and

7 insert in lieu thereof ‘‘20’’.

8 SEC. 2. Paragraph 3 of Rule XXV of the Standing

9 Rules of the Senate is amended for the One Hundred

10 Third Congress as follows, in subparagraph (a) strike

11 ‘‘21’’ after ‘‘Small Business’’ and insert in lieu thereof

12 ‘‘22’’.
2

SRES 130 ATS

Æ
#### § 1.9002-6 Acquiring corporation.

Section 5(d) of the Act provides that for purposes of such Act in the case of the acquisition of the assets of a corporation by another corporation in a distribution or transfer described in section 381(a) of the Code the acquiring corporation shall be treated as if it were the distributor or transferor corporation.

[T.D. 6490, 25 FR 8373, Sept. 1, 1960]
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, James M. Seneff, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the corporate  general  partner of CNL Income Fund VIII, Ltd. (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the  Partnership's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 (the "Report"). The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



Date:  November 10, 2003                /s/ James M. Seneff, Jr.
                                        --------------------------------
                                        Name:  James M. Seneff, Jr.
                                        Title: Chief Executive Officer


                                        A  signed   original  of  this   written
                                        statement  required  by Section  906 has
                                        been  provided  to CNL Income Fund VIII,
                                        Ltd.  and will be retained by CNL Income
                                        Fund VIII,  Ltd.  and  furnished  to the
                                        Securities  and Exchange  Commission  or
                                        its staff upon request.
Autoridad de Aviaci6n Civil 

Kn1 91/l, Ca1-retc:t.1 Panan1t.!ricana, llopangoJ El Sidv,HlOl\ C.:\. 

'IU,: 25654409. 

Mr. Paul Gretch 

Director 

Office of International Aviation 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

40007111 Street, S.W. Room 6402 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dear Mr. Gretch: 

Gerencia L,egal. 

llopango, May 23, 2014 

AAC-GL-028-2014-DE 

The El Salvador Civil Aviation Authority hereby confirms, that it will grant, on the basis of 

reciprocity, to any air carrier designated by the United States of America, the right to conduct 

fifth and seventh freedom traffic rights on schedules or non-schedules basis, which are in 

conformity to the Air Transport Agreement between the Government of the United States of 

America and the Government of El Salvador, signed on May 8111 1997. 

Sincerely Yours, 

Li
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc. (the "Company") for the annual period
ended December 31, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael A. Ewald, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Sally F.
Dornaus, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:

Date:
February 26, 2020



/s/ Michael A. Ewald Michael A. Ewald
Chief Executive OfficerBain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc./s/ Sally F. Dornaus Sally F. Dornaus
Chief Financial OfficerBain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc.


---



QuickLinks
#### § 31.3121(a)(15)-1 Payments by employer to disabled former employee.

The term “wages” does not include any payment made after 1972 by an employer to an employee, if at the time such payment is made such employee is entitled to disability insurance benefits under section 223(a) of the Social Security Act and such entitlement commenced prior to the calendar year in which such payment is made, and if such employee did not perform any service for such employer during the period for which such payment is made.

[T.D. 7374, 40 FR 30950, July 24, 1975, as amended by T.D. 7373, 40 FR 30957, July 24, 1975]
## R e q u e s t f

o r I n f o r m a t i o n ­ F A

A

­ 2 0 1 5

­ 2 2 1 4

9

­ A W A

­ A V S

­ 3 3 3 E x e m p t i o n s ( F A

A )

S e n t : T u e s d a y , A u g u s t 0 4

, 2 0 1 5 9 : 0 6 A M

T o : b r a d @ u m v s o l u t i o n s

. c o m C c : N g o , D a n ( F A A )

D e a r M r

. B a e r w a l d t :

T h i s l e t t e r i s t o i n f o r m y o u t h a t t h e f

o l l o w i n g i n f

o r m a t i o n i s m i s s i n g f r o m y

o u r p e t i t i o n ( D o c k

e t N o

. F A A

− 2 0 1 5

− 2 2 1 4 )

. T h i s i n f o r m a t i o n i s n e c e s s a r y f

o r t h e F e d e r a l A v i a t i o n A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ( F A A ) t o p r o c e s s y o u r p e t i t i o n

.

D e s c r i b e t h e a i r c r a f

t m a k e s , m o d e l s , a n d t

y p e s ( i

. e

. , f i x e d

‐ w i n g , r o t o r c r a f t

, l i g h t e r

‐ t h a n

‐ a i r ) f

o r t h e p r o p o s e d

U A S o p e r a t i o n

. T h e d e s c r i p t i o n s s h o u l d i n c l u d e t h e m a x i m u m w e i g h t ( i n c l u d i n g p a y l o a d )

. T h i s i n f o r m a t i o n

c a n b e l o c a t e d i n t h e a i r c r a f

t m a n u a l s

.

P l e a s e s u b m i t t h e a d d i t i o n a l i n f o r m a t i o n ( n o n

‐ p r o p r i e t a r y ) t o y o u r d o c k e t a t w w w

. r e g u l a t i o n s

. g o v a n d s u b m i t a n y

p r o p r i e t a r y i n f

o r m a t i o n t o t h e F A A H e a d q u a r t e r s o r e l e c t r o n i c a l l y v i a e m a i l t o 3 3 3 e x e m p t i o n s @ f a a

. g o v

. I f y

o u w a n t

u s t o p r o c e s s y

o u r r e q u e s t a n y f u r t h e r , w e m u s t r e c e i v e t h e i n f o r m a t i o n d e s c r i b e d a b o v

e b y 8 / 1 8 / 1 5

. I f w e d o n o t

r e c e i v e t h e i n f o r m a t i o n , w e w i l l c l o s e t h e d o c k e t w i t h o u t n o t i f

y i n g y o u f u r t h e r

.

I f y o u h a v e a n y q u e s t i o n s , p l e a s e f

e e l f r e e t o c o n t a c t m e a t ( 2 0 2 ) 2 6 7

­ 4 2 6 4

.

S i n c e r e l y , D a n N g o
F A A O f f i c e o f R u l e m a k i n g
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,320,777
<SECURITIES>                                 1,647,548
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,607,313
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,985,101
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          282,646
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,953,477
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,985,101
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               103,256
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               296,427
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (861,729)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (861,729)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (861,729)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (22.92)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (22.92)<F1>
<FN>
<F1>EPS IS NET INCOME (LOSS) PER $1,000 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP UNIT.
</FN>


</TABLE>
No. 96-10905 - 1 -

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-10905 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus
JORGE EDUARDO DAVALOS, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:96-CR-10-2

- - - - - - - - - - February 24, 1997 Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jorge Eduardo Davalos was convicted of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine and possession of cocaine. On appeal, Davalos challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his convictions. To prove the possession with intent to distribute charges against Davalos, the Government was required to prove knowing possession of the illegal substances with intent to distribute.United States v. Cardenas , 9 F.3d 1139, 1158 (5th Cir. 1993),

cert. denied , 114 S. Ct. 2150 (1994). To prove the conspiracy count, the Government was required to show an agreement to violate the drug laws and that the defendant knew about it and voluntarily joined and participated in it. United States v. Pierre , 958 F.2d 1304, 1311 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied , 506 U.S. 898 (1992). We conclude that a rational trier of fact could have found that the evidence established guilt of these crimes beyond a reasonable doubt. United States v. Ivey , 949 F.2d 759, 766 (5th Cir. 1991), cert. denied , 506 U.S. 819 (1992). AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Properties III L.P.
(the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 29, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
James Hussey, Chief Financial Officer of Richman Housing Credits Inc., general
partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties III L.P., general partner of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.




/s/James HusseyJames
      HusseyChief
      Financial Officer of RichmanHousing
      Credits Inc., general partnerof
      Richman Tax Credit Properties IIIL.P.,
      General Partner of the RegistrantJuly
      29, 2010
100 Seawall Road, Adak AK 99546 Phone: 206-497-7155 Fax: 509-293-4788

March 17, 2015

Mr. Kevin Schlemmer

Office of Aviation Analysis

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Proposal to provide essential air service in Adak, Alaska, Docket DOT-OST-2000-8556

Dear Mr. Schlemmer:

I am writing you to express our support and interest in keeping the existing two weekly flights to Adak provided by 

Alaska Airlines, as outlined in their February 11th proposal. This jet service is the only form of reliable transportation 

to transport our Live Crab out of Adak and into the market place. Due to the nature of our extremely perishable 

product, it is time sensitive and can only economically be flown out of Adak. Losing Alaska Airlines jet service would 

be detrimental to our business model and we would have to leave Adak as there would not be a reliable, proper 

way to get our products to our customers. Our product goes to customers not only in the contiguous United States

but also Asia and the Middle East. 

As a testament to the potential success of our business model, Premier Harvest has shipped approximately 73,000

pounds of Live Golden King Crab and used 36 passenger flights originating or departing from Adak since December 

2014. We are looking at our outgoing volume to increase to approximately 150,000 pounds per week if we can 

secure more flights into Adak. Succinctly put, not only do we need the two weekly flights proposed but we have 

also reached out to Alaska Airlines representatives to inquire about the possibility of more flights. Ultimately, we 

believe that successfully implementing our business plan will help in reducing the amount of subsidy required for 

Essential Air Service in the coming years.

It is imperative to the survival of our business in Adak that the twice a week jet aircraft flights remain as a minimum 

service level. Alaska Airlines has been wonderful to work with and have went up and beyond to help us move our 

perishable product even when there have been weather or mechanical problems. As we look into expanding the 

capabilities of the processing plant, Alaska Airlines service will be integral in moving materials and passengers in 

and out of Adak, similar to other processing plants that have operated in Adak in the past.

Respectfully I urge the Department of Transportation to support the Alaska Airlines proposal for providing Essential 

Air Services to Adak, Alaska. Without the support and operation of Alaska Airlines our operations in Adak, Alaska 

will not be successful. Should you have and questions or concerns please feel free to contact me at any time. 

Sincerely,

Dustin Anderson

Chief Executive Officer / Founder
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS  
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                        AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                   24,540
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                             3,077
<ALLOWANCES>                               (500)
<INVENTORY>                               2,588
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         32,135
<PP&E>                                  496,466
<DEPRECIATION>                         (496,466)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           33,730
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   209,055
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                 19,333
<OTHER-SE>                             (194,658)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             33,730
<SALES>                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         86,902
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            98,475
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (11,573)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (11,573)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                            (11,573)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

          We, Stephen M. Dyott, Chief Executive Officer of ACG Holdings, Inc.
and American Color Graphics, Inc., collectively (the "Company") and Joseph M.
Milano, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certify that this
report fully complies with the requirements of section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78o(d)), and that the information contained
herein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Date     August 13, 2002                             /s/ Stephen M. Dyott
         ---------------                             ---------------------------
                                                         Stephen M. Dyott
                                                         Chief Executive Officer



Date     August 13, 2002                             /s/ Joseph M. Milano
         ---------------                             ---------------------------
                                                         Joseph M. Milano
                                                         Chief Financial Officer