alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 1 | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2016-1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 2 | Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 3 | Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 4 | Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 5 | All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. |

|                                                               |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                               |  |
| /s/ Ryan C. Farris                                            |   |
|                                                          |
| Ryan C. Farris                                                |
| President, Ally Auto Assets LLC, as Depositor                 |
| (Senior Officer in charge of securitization of the depositor) |
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Felton TABOR, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-4022.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 7, 2002.

Decided June 24, 2002.

C. Carlyle Steele, Jr., Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellant. Regan Alexandra Pendleton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Felton Tabor appeals his sentence imposed by the district court. Felton’s counsel has filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), asserting there are no meritorious issues for appeal, but addressing the propriety of the district court’s plea hearing conducted pursuant to Fed. R.Crim.P. 11. Tabor has also filed an informal brief on his own behalf raising several additional contentions. We have reviewed the plea hearing and the colloquy the district court undertook with Tabor. We find the court fully complied with Rule *70911 and that Tabor’s plea was knowing and voluntary. Moreover, we find the issues raised in Tabor’s informal brief to be without merit. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.

We have examined the entire record in this case in accordance with the requirements of *Anders*and find no meritorious issues for appeal. This Court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this Court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. Finally, we dispense with oral argument, because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 151 (Friday, August 7, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39715-39716]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19003]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (09-071)]


Review of U.S. Human Space Flight Plans Committee; Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public 
Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration announces a meeting of the Review of U.S. Human Space 
Flight Plans Committee. This is a contingency public meeting if 
required by the committee and is subject to cancellation on short 
notice. For the most up-to-date information, refer to the Committee Web 
site (http://hsf.nasa.gov) or contact the NASA Designated Federal 
Official by e-mail (<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#23534b4a4f4a530d4e40424f4a50574651634d4250420d444c55"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="15657d7c797c653b787674797c66617067557b7466743b727a63">[email protected]</span></a>) or phone (202-358-0712).

DATES: Monday, August 24, 2009, 1 p.m.-5:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: JW Marriott Hotel, Grand Ballroom, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, 
Washington, DC 20004, phone: 202-626-6906.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Philip R. McAlister, Office of 
Program Analysis and Evaluation, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration, Washington, DC 20546, at 202-358-0712.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The agenda topics for the meeting include 
Committee deliberations on the Final Report. The meeting will be open 
to the public up to the seating capacity of the room. It is imperative 
that the meeting be held on this date to accommodate the scheduling 
priorities of the key participants.


[[Page 39716]]


    Dated: August 4, 2009.
P. Diane Rausch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-19003 Filed 8-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 The undersigned officer of Summit Financial Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and in connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report), that, to such officer's knowledge:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated: November 5, 2003
 
 /s/ Blaise B. Bettendorf
 Blaise B. Bettendorf, Senior Vice President
 and Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Summit Financial Corporation and will be retained by Summit Financial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | CMBS Department

 

MAC N9401-011

1055 10th Avenue SE

Minneapolis, MN 55414 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.

1585 Broadway

New York, New York 10036

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for MAD 2015-11MD Mortgage Trust Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates

 

Per the Trust and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 6, 2015 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

March 1, 2016

 

/s/ GAIL VANNEST

GAIL VANNEST

Vice President

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
/)Oj-05;1- 1116-17/ { 

Manistee County Blacker Airport Authority 

2323 Airport Road • Manistee, Michigan49660 • ('231 l 723-4351 

May16th, 2014 

Kevin Schlemmer 

Chief, Essential Air Service Division, X-53 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey A venue SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dear Mr. Schlemmer, 

........ .i 

: '! 

,,. 

."-·····"'···· 

On behalf of the Manistee Blacker Airport Authority I as Chairman, am inquiring as to the 

status of Grant Agreements between the Airport Authority and the US Department of 

Transportation. These Grant Agreements provide for the essential air service at Manistee 

through the Alternate Essential Air Service Program. 

···, .. .) 

I am requesting information on the status of Addendum #3 to the Grant Agreement entered 

into by the Parties on May 3, 2012. This agreement provides for the current air service at 

Manistee under the Alternate Essential Air Service Program. The addendum extends the end 

date of the current Grant Agreement to July 25th, 2014. In addition the Airport Authority 

submitted a ·proposal for a new four year Grant Agreement to DOT on April10, 2014. Our 

expectation is that a new four year agreement will be in place by July 25th in order to avoid an 

interruption in air service at Manistee. 

Timely action on our requests is necessary to prevent harm to the community that a lapse in 

service would cause. Under the standard Essential Air Service program, the importance of 

uninterrupted service is a priority, to the point that air carriers are held-in until replacement 

service is obtained. Although we are operating under the Alternate Essential Air Service 

Program, the importance of uninterrupted air service is equally essential. 

We are available for any request you may have to help expedite completion of the new 

contract. In the mean time we look forvvard to a fully executed copy of Addendum #3 

(extension). If there is anything you need please let our Airport Director Barry Lind know. 

Thank you for your consideration in this matter. 

Since?ViJdu£2--

Paul D. Schulert 

Chairman Manistee Blacker Airport Authority 

Cc: Sen. Carl Levin 

Sen. Debbie Stabenow 

Rep. Dan ~enishek M.D. 

Gov. Rick Snyder
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 153 (Tuesday, August 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40180-40181]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19128]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL08-49-003]


BJ Energy LLC, Franklin Power LLC, GLE Trading LLC, Ocean Power 
LLC, Pillar Fund LLC, Complainants, v. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., 
Respondent; Notice of Filing

August 4, 2009.
    Take notice that on July 31, 2009, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. 
filed a refund report in compliance with the Commission's April 2, 2009 
Order, BJ Energy LLC v. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., 127 FERC 61,006 
(2009).
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will

[[Page 40181]]

not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or motion 
to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests must 
be filed on or before the comment date. Anyone filing a motion to 
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the 
Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#83c5c6d1c0ccedefeaede6d0f6f3f3ecf1f7c3e5e6f1e0ade4ecf5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b8fefdeafbf7d6d4d1d6ddebcdc8c8d7caccf8deddcadb96dfd7ce">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on August 21, 2009.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-19128 Filed 8-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 151 (Friday, August 7, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 39719]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18981]



[[Page 39719]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request; Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC 
20549-0213.

Extension:
    Form T-3, OMB Control No. 3235-0105, SEC File No. 270-123.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collection of 
information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this 
existing collection of information to the Office of Management and 
Budget for approval.
    Form T-3 (17 CFR 269.3) is an application for qualification of an 
indenture under the Trust Indenture Act of 1939 (15 U.S.C. 77aaa et 
seq.). The information provided by Form T-3 is used by the staff to 
decide whether to qualify an indenture relating to securities offered 
to the public in an offering registered under the Securities Act of 
1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.). Form T-3 takes approximately 43 hours per 
response to prepare and is filed by 78 respondents. We estimate that 
25% of the 43 burden hours (11 hours per response) is prepared by the 
filer for a total reporting burden of 858 hours (11 hours per response 
x 78 responses).
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether this proposed 
collection of information is necessary for the performance of the 
functions of the agency, including whether the information will have 
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the 
burden imposed by the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance 
the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) 
ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
respondents, including through the use of automated collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will 
be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60 
days of this publication.
    Please direct your written comments to Charles Boucher, Director/
CIO, Securities and Exchange Commission, C/O Shirley Martinson, 6432 
General Green Way, Alexandria, Virginia 22312; or send an e-mail to: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b1e1e3f0eefcd0d8ddd3dec9f1c2d4d29fd6dec7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="08585a4957456961646a6770487b6d6b266f677e">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: August 3, 2009.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-18981 Filed 8-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
II; II 

~ni!.!;~~~ff? AI, POfluu~n Controf DI'tricf 24580 Silver Cloud Court I 

Monterey. CA 93940 

• 

" Serving Monterey, San Benito and Santa Cruz Counties I PHONE: (831) 647-9411 • FAX: (831) 647-8501 II 

-- II 

I July 28,2010 

Mr. Jared Blumenfeld 

Regional Administrator 

U.S. EPA Region 9 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

I 

SUBJECT: IMPLEME1TATION OF GREENHOUSE GAS T~ILORfNG RULE 

Dear Administrator Blumenfeld: I 

As requested in the Final Gr~enhouse Gas Tailoring Rule, the konteiey Bay Unified Air 

Pollution Control District is informing EPA Region 9 on rule change~ necessary to 

implement the Tailoring Rul~ Greenhouse Gas (GHG) provisidns. II • 

The District's New Source Jeview and Prevention of Significabt De1brioration rule (Rule 

207) contains language that ~llows us to implement the Tailori~g Rul:e GHG provisions. 

Therefore, no changes to Rule 207 are necessary to implement ithe Tailoring Rule. 

The District's Title V rule (Jule 218) does not have the flexibJity n~Lssary to implement 

the Tailoring Rule GHG pro~isions. Therefore, the District wilI be ptoposing revisions to 

the definition ofMajor Sour~e in Rule 218 to mirror the Tailoring RJle. I 

II 

Should you have any questid1ns relative to this matter

Ericksen or Mike Sewell of tny staff. 

, you rna 

II 

contact e

I 

' 

ither Lance 

II 

Sincerely, II 

j'ichard Sted~1 Air Pollution Control Officer 'I 

Monterey Bay Unified APCD 

Rkho" A. """m~, AirPoIfu",," Coo"'" 0#11
#### James S. WILLIAMS, Petitioner—Appellant, v. SUPERIOR COURT KERN COUNTY, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 01-16347.

D.C. No. CV-93-05508-REC.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 15, 2002.

Decided June 14, 2002.

Before HAWKINS and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI,* Judge.

*

 Honorable Jane A. Restani, United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

We previously remanded this case for the district court to determine whether Williams’s request to represent himself on the day of trial was made for the purpose of delay. *Williams v. Kern County Superior Court,*1999 WL 132271 (9th Cir.1999). The district court conducted an evidentiary hearing and heard testimony from Williams, his trial counsel, the state prosecutor and the state trial judge. The district court concluded that the request for self-representation was just “another effort to delay the trial.” Because the district court properly considered the “purpose of delay” factors of *Fritz v. Spalding,*682 F.2d 782 (9th Cir.1982), and its factual *891findings are not clearly erroneous, we affirm the denial of habeas relief.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
IA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 15

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution to provide for a balanced budget

for the United States Government and for greater accountability in

the enactment of tax legislation.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. EMERSON introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution to provide for

a balanced budget for the United States Government

and for greater accountability in the enactment of tax

legislation.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution if ratified
2

HJ 15 IH

1 by the legislatures of three-forths of the several States

2 within seven years after its submission to the States for

3 ratification:

4 ‘‘ARTICLE—

5 ‘‘SECTION 1. Prior to each fiscal year, the Congress

6 and the President shall agree on an estimate of total re7 ceipts for that fiscal year by enactment into law of a joint

8 resolution devoted solely to that subject. Total outlays for

9 that year shall not exceed the level of estimated receipts

10 set forth in such joint resolution, unless three-fifths of the

11 total membership of each House of Congress shall provide,

12 by a rollcall vote, for a specific excess of outlays over esti13 mated receipts.

14 ‘‘SECTION 2. Whenever actual outlays exceed actual

15 receipts for any fiscal year, the Congress shall, in the en16 suing fiscal year, provide by law for the repayment of such

17 excess. The public debt of the United States shall not be

18 increased unless three-fifths of the total membership of

19 each House shall provide by law for such an increase by

20 a rollcall vote.

21 ‘‘SECTION 3. Prior to each fiscal year, the President

22 shall transmit to the Congress a proposed budget for the

23 United States Government for that fiscal year in which

24 total outlays do not exceed total receipts.
3

HJ 15 IH

1 ‘‘SECTION 4. No bill to increase revenue shall become

2 law unless approved by a majority of the total membership

3 of each House by a rollcall vote.

4 ‘‘SECTION 5. The provisions of this article are waived

5 for any fiscal year in which a declaration of war is in ef6 fect.

7 ‘‘SECTION 6. Total receipts shall include all receipts

8 of the United States except those derived from borrowing.

9 Total outlays shall include all outlays of the United States

10 except for those for repayment of debt principal.

11 ‘‘SECTION 7. This article shall take effect beginning

12 with fiscal year 1995 or with the second fiscal year begin13 ning after its ratification, whichever is later.’’.

Æ