alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                               
<ARTICLE>                           5
                                     
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                 714,037
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                0
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             0
<PP&E>                              18,785,390
<DEPRECIATION>                       4,178,182
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      15,442,344
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        0
<BONDS>                              5,657,243
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                   0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        15,442,344
<SALES>                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     2,758,076
<CGS>                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        2,052,212
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     336,698
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        369,166
<INCOME-TAX>                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          0
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                           369,166
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            22.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                            22.34
        
 

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 152 (Monday, August 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 39918]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19087]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


University of Texas at Austin, et al.; Notice of Consolidated 
Decision on Applications for Duty-Free Entry of Electron Microscopes

    This is a decision consolidated pursuant to Section 6(c) of the 
Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 
(Pub. L. 89-651, as amended by Pub. L. 106-36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR 
part 301). Related records can be viewed between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. 
in Room 3705, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.
    Docket Number: 09-038. Applicant: University of Texas at Austin, 
Austin, TX 78758. Instrument: Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI 
Company, Czech Republic. Intended Use: See notice at 74 FR 32890, July 
9, 2009.
    Docket Number: 09-039. Applicant: National Institutes of Health, 
Hamilton, MT 59840. Instrument: Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI 
Company, Czech Republic. Intended Use: See notice at 74 FR 32890, July 
9, 2009.
    Docket Number: 09-040. Applicant: Stanford University, Stanford, CA 
94305. Instrument: Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI Company, the 
Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at 74 FR 32890, July 9, 2009.
    Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of 
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such 
purposes as these instruments are intended to be used, was being 
manufactured in the United States at the time the instruments were 
ordered. Reasons: Each foreign instrument is an electron microscope and 
is intended for research or scientific educational uses requiring an 
electron microscope. We know of no electron microscope, or any other 
instrument suited to these purposes, which was being manufactured in 
the United States at the time of order of each instrument.

    Dated: August 4, 2009.
Gregory Campbell,
Acting Director, Subsidies Enforcement Office, Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-19087 Filed 8-7-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 152 (Monday, August 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 39934]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19088]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

Withdrawal of Application for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific 
Instruments

    Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific and 
Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-651; as amended 
by Pub. L. 106-36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301), the Department of 
Commerce determines whether instruments of equivalent scientific value, 
for the purposes for which the instruments shown below are intended to 
be used, are being manufactured in the United States.
    Applications may be examined between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. in Room 
2104, Statutory Import Programs Staff, U.S. Department of Commerce 14th 
and Constitution Ave., NW., Room 2104 Washington, DC 20230.
    Docket Number: 09-041. Applicant: State University of New York 
College at Geneseo, Erwin Hall 218, 1 College Circle, Geneseo, NY 
14454. Instrument: 4.5 Model Astrodome. Manufacturer: Astro Dome, 
Australia. Intended Use: The instrument will be used to house a 
telescope and CCD. Application accepted by Commissioner of Customs and 
Border Protection: June 26, 2008.
    The Department of Commerce received the Rice University application 
from Customs and Border Protection on July 13, 2009. The application 
was reviewed and the Department determined that the application did not 
have sufficient information for the Department to determine whether an 
equivalent instrument was being produced in the United States. In 
accordance with section 301.5(a)(2), the Department contacted the 
University to afford them an opportunity to supplement the application 
by providing further information regarding the purpose of the 
instrument and whether an equivalent instrument was being produced in 
the United States.
    The State University of New York College at Geneseo then informed 
the Department that they had discovered that cost and design features 
were the determining factors in selecting the instrument. The 
University decided to withdraw the application for the Model Astrodome 
since they had been made aware that neither of these factors could be 
considered a pertinent specification in the comparison of instruments, 
in accordance with section 301.2(s).
    Therefore, the Department of Commerce had discontinued the 
processing of this application, in accordance with section 301.5(g) of 
the regulations. See 15 CFR 301.5(g).

    Dated: August 4, 2009.
Gregory Campbell,
Acting Director, Subsidies Enforcement Office, Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-19088 Filed 8-7-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
```
§ 31.3306(c)(5)-1 Family employment. ( a ) Certain services are excepted from employment because of the existence of a family relationship between the employee and the individual employing him. The exceptions are as follows: ( 1 ) Services performed by an individual in the employ of his or her spouse;
( 2 ) Services performed by a father or mother in the employ of his or her son or daughter; and
( 3 ) Services performed by a son or daughter under the age of 21 in the employ of his or her father or mother.
( b ) Under paragraph (a) (1) and (2) of this section, the exception is conditioned solely upon the family relationship between the employee and the individual employing him. Under paragraph (a)(3) of this section, in addition to the family relationship, there is a further requirement that the son or daughter shall be under the age of 21, and the exception continues only during the time that such son or daughter is under the age of 21.
( c ) Services performed in the employ of a partnership are within the exception described in paragraph (a) of this section only if the requisite family relationship exists between the employee and each of the partners comprising the partnership.
( d ) Services performed in the employ of a corporation are not within the exception described in paragraph (a) of this section, except that services performed in the employ of an entity that is treated as a corporation under § 301.7701-2(c)(2)(iv)(B) of this chapter may qualify for the exception if the requirements of the exception are otherwise met. An entity that is treated as a corporation under § 301.7701-2(c)(2)(iv)(B) of this chapter is not treated as the employer for purposes of applying section 3306(c)(5) and this section. For purposes of applying section 3306(c)(5) and this section, the owner of an entity that is treated as a corporation under § 301.7701-2(c)(2)(iv)(B) of this chapter is treated as the employer.
( e ) Paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section apply to wages paid on or after November 1, 2011. However, taxpayers may apply paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section to wages paid on or after January 1, 2009.
[T.D. 6516, 25 FR 13032, Dec. 20, 1960; 25 FR 14021, Dec. 31, 1960, as amended by T.D. 9554, 76 FR 67365, Nov. 1, 2011; T.D. 9670, 79 FR 36206, June 26, 2014]
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-16-00347-CR

Steven Turner, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 7 OF TRAVIS COUNTY,

NO. C-1-CR-12-216032,

THE HONORABLE ELISABETH ASHLEA EARLE, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R A N D M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s brief was due September 15, 2016. The brief has not been received and

appellant, representing himself in this Court pro se, did not respond to this Court’s notice that the

brief is overdue.

The appeal is abated and remanded to the trial court. The trial court shall conduct a

hearing to determine whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, whether appellant is

indigent, and, if so, whether counsel should be appointed to represent appellant in this appeal. See

Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). The court shall make appropriate written findings and

recommendations and, if necessary, shall appoint counsel who will effectively represent appellant

in this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). Following the hearing, which shall be

transcribed, the trial court shall order the appropriate supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s
records—including all findings and orders—to be prepared and forwarded to this Court no later than

February 10, 2017. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(3).

It is so ordered on this the 11th day of January, 2017.

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Goodwin

Abated and Remanded

Filed: January 11, 2017

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                         438,136
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      17,564,243
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,843,714
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,668,095
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      6,191,611
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,668,095
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,408,999
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,359,849
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                (3,344)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             299,342
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (246,848)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (246,848)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (14.94)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (14.94)    
        

</TABLE>
#### § 31.6061-1 Signing of returns.

Each return required under the regulations in this subpart shall, if signature is called for by the form or instructions relating to the return, be signed by (a) the individual, if the person required to make the return is an individual; (b) the president, vice president, or other principal officer, if the person required to make the return is a corporation; (c) a responsible and duly authorized member or officer having knowledge of its affairs, if the person required to make the return is a partnership or other unincorporated organization; or (d) the fiduciary, if the person required to make the return is a trust or estate. The return may be signed for the taxpayer by an agent who is duly authorized in accordance with § 31.6011(a)-7 to make such return.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                           GTECH HOLDINGS CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of GTECH Holdings Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 28, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the Date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jaymin
B. Patel, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to sections 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date: June 30, 2005               /s/ Jaymin B. Patel
                                  -------------------------------------------
                                  Jaymin B. Patel, Senior Vice President and
                                  Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 10.3

                             FIRST AMENDMENT
                                 TO THE
             GIANT INDUSTRIES, INC. AND AFFILIATED COMPANIES
                        DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN


WHEREAS, Giant Industries, Inc. (the "Employer") maintains the Giant
Industries, Inc. and Affiliated Companies Deferred Compensation Plan (the
"Plan") effective October 31, 2005; and

WHEREAS the Employer desires to amend the plan to permit a one-time
change in distribution elections under transition rules under applicable
regulations; and

WHEREAS the Board of Directors has authorized the Administrative
Committee to amend the Plan, to facilitate the Plan's administration of
its design if the modifications do not significantly increase the cost of
the Plan.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended by adding Section 6.13 as follows:

"6.13	TRANSITION ELECTION

	A Participant may make an election to change the distribution date
      with respect to amounts deferred for 2005 under Section 6.4; the
      distribution form with respect to distributions under Section 6.1;
      and the distribution date under Section 6.7, as long as (1) the
      election is made by December 31, 2006, (2) the election change is
      not made with respect to payments that would otherwise be made in
      2006, and (3) the election change does not cause payments to be
      made in 2006."

Adopted as of  November 13, 2006.

Administrative Committee of the Giant Industries, Inc.
and Affiliated Companies Deferred Compensation Plan

By: /s/ NATALIE R. DOPP
   -------------------------------------------------

Committee Member: Natalie R. Dopp
                 -----------------------------------
Exhibit 35.25



|     |  |  |  |                                                                                                                        
|---- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  |  |  | Corporate Trust Services 
MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045 
Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax:
410 715 2380

Citibank, National Association

388 Greenwich Street

14th Floor

New York, New York 10013



|Re: | Annual Statement of Compliance for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust 2016-C37, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series
2016-C37
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2016 (the
Agreement), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator (Wells Fargo), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the
Reporting Period):

(a) A review of Wells Fargos activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the
Agreement has been made under such officers supervision; and

(b) To the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review,
Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

March 1, 2017



|              
|--------------
|LOGO          
|BRIAN SMITH   
|Vice President



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
EX-4.31



 





Exhibit 4.31




CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

TO

CERTIFICATE OF TRUST

OF

ST. PAUL TRAVELERS CAPITAL TRUST III




     THIS Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Trust (the “Amendment”) of St. Paul Travelers
Capital Trust III (the “Trust”) is being duly executed as of February 27, 2007 and filed on behalf
of the Trust by each of the undersigned, as trustees, to amend the Certificate of Trust of the
Trust which was filed on June 28, 2004 (the “Certificate of Trust”), with the Secretary of State of
the State of Delaware under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act (12 Del. C. § 3801 et
seq.) (the “Act”).



     Names. The name of
the statutory trust and Delaware trustee amended hereby is St. Paul Travelers Capital Trust III and Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National Association.



     Amendments.
The Certificate of Trust is hereby amended by changing the name of
the Trust to  Travelers Capital Trust III and the name of the trustee to The Bank of New York (Delaware).


                             The Certificate of Trust is hereby further amended by changing the address of the trustee to 100 White Clay Center, Route 273, P.O. Box 6995, Newark, DE 19711.


     Effective Date. This Amendment shall be effective upon filing.



 









 





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned, as trustees of the Trust, have executed this
Amendment in accordance with Section 3811(a)(2) of the Act.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	THE BANK OF NEW YORK (DELAWARE),
as Delaware Trustee
 	 
	 	By:  	/s/  Kristine K. Gullo	 
	 	 	Name:  	Kristine K. Gullo	 
	 	 	Title:  	Vice President	 
	 




 








 





	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Bruce A. Backberg	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 

Name: Bruce A. Backberg, as
Administrative Trustee
Editorial Note on Part 868
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 868 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 868.5795 Tracheal tube cleaning brush. ( a ) *Identification.* A tracheal tube cleaning brush is a device consisting of a brush with plastic bristles intended to clean tracheal cannula devices after their removal from patients.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 868.9. If the device is not labeled or otherwise represented as sterile, it is exempt from the current good manufacturing practice requirements of the quality system regulation in part 820 of this chapter, with the exception of § 820.180, with respect to general requirements concerning records, and § 820.198, with respect to complaint files.
[51 FR 40388, Nov. 6, 1986, as amended at 66 FR 38795, July 25, 2001]
#### In the Matter of Martin E., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant. Clinton County Department of Social Services, Respondent.

[804 NYS2d 458]

Peters, J.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Clinton County (Lawliss, J.), entered March 11, 2005, which, inter aha, granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 3, to extend respondent’s placement with petitioner.

In December 2003, respondent was adjudicated a juvenile delinquent and placed in petitioner’s custody for a period of one year. This proceeding was initiated for an extension of respondent’s placement and an approval of his permanency plan. After a hearing, Family Court granted the relief requested, thus prompting this appeal.

We find no error in Family Court’s consideration of the *960Uniform Case Review Risk Assessment and Service Plan, annexed as an exhibit to the petition, since those documents are required by 22 NYCRR 205.17 (d) (2). In addition to its consideration of those documents, Family Court reviewed the testimony of the director of clinical services at respondent’s residence, its social worker and the family’s foster care caseworker, before determining that it was not in respondent’s best interests to return to his mother’s custody. It found that the mother was unable to provide respondent with meaningful and adequate supervision in light of his then-current behaviors, which demonstrated that he posed a danger to himself, his mother and the community. It further determined that petitioner made reasonable efforts with both respondent and his mother to assist in respondent’s safe return home *(see*Family Ct Act § 355.3 [4] [i]; *Matter of Michael RR.,*266 AD2d 709, 710-711 [1999]). According due deference to the credibility determinations made by Family Court *(see Matter of Michael RR., supra*at 710; *Matter of Sabrina S.,*256 AD2d 914, 915 [1998]), we find that a preponderance of credible evidence supports the determination rendered *(see*Family Ct Act § 350.3 [2]; *see also Matter of Mickie PP.,*279 AD2d 943, 945 [2001]).

Cardona, P.J., Spain, Carpinello and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****What you need to know aboutthyroid cancer**
 
PDF | Mobi | epub
 
SuDoc:HE 20.3152:T 42/2/2012
Item Number:0507-G-02 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000910702
 
December 13, 2017