Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 152 / Monday, August 10, 2009 / Notices 39979 

*FPL Energy Seabrook, LLC (FPLE Seabrook) is 

authorized to act as agent for the Hudson Light & 

Power Department, Massachusetts Municipal 

Wholesale Electric Company, and Taunton 

Municipal Light and has exclusive responsibility 

and control over the physical construction, 

operation and maintenance of the facility. 

from occupational exposure to benzene. 

The major information collection 

requirements in the Standard include 

conducting worker exposure 

monitoring, notifying workers of the 

benzene exposure, implementing a 

written compliance program, 

implementing medical surveillance for 

workers, providing examining 

physicians with specific information, 

ensuring that workers receive a copy of 

their medical surveillance records, and 

providing access to these records by 

OSHA, the National Institute for 

Occupational Safety and Health, the 

worker who is the subject of the records, 

the worker’s representative, and other 

designated parties. 

II. Special Issues for Comment 

OSHA has a particular interest in 

comments on the following issues: 

• Whether the proposed information 

collection requirements are necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

Agency’s functions, including whether 

the information is useful; 

• The accuracy of OSHA’s estimate of 

the burden (time and costs) of the 

information collection requirements, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

• The quality, utility, and clarity of 

the information collected; and 

• Ways to minimize the burden on 

employers who must comply; for 

example, by using automated or other 

technological information collection 

and transmission techniques. 

III. Proposed Actions 

OSHA is requesting that OMB extend 

its approval of the collections of 

information requirements contained in 

the Standard on Benzene (29 CFR 

1910.1028). As a result of re-estimating 

the number of medical examinations 

from 10,800 examinations to 11,233 

examinations there was an increase in 

burden hours from 125,209 hours to 

126,180 hours and an increase in costs 

from $8,132,978 to $8,133,499. 

OSHA will summarize the comments 

submitted in response to this notice, 

and will include this summary in 

request to OMB to extend the approval 

of the information collection 

requirements contained in the Benzene 

standard (29 CFR 1910.1028). 

Type of Review: Extension of 

currently approved collection. 

Title: Benzene Standard (29 CFR 

1910.1028). 

OMB Number: 1218–0129. 

Affected Public: Business or other forprofits. 

Total Responses: 267,376. 

Frequency: On occasion. 

Estimated Time per Response: Varies 

from 5 minutes (.08 hour) for employers 

to maintain records to 4 hours for 

workers to receive referral medical 

exams. 

Total Burden Hours: 126,180. 

Estimated Cost (Operation and 

Maintenance): $8,133,499. 

IV. Public Participation—Submission of 

Comments on This Notice and Internet 

Access to Comments and Submissions 

You may submit comments in 

response to this document as follows: 

(1) Electronically at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, which is the 

Federal e-Rulemaking Portal; (2) by 

facsimile (FAX); or (3) by hard copy. All 

comments, attachments, and other 

material must identify the Agency name 

and OSHA docket number for the ICR 

(Docket No. OSHA–2009–0021). You 

may supplement electronic submissions 

by uploading document files 

electronically. If you wish to mail 

additional materials in reference to an 

electronic or facsimile submission, you 

must submit them to the OSHA docket 

Office (see the section of this notice 

titled ADDRESSES). The additional 

materials must clearly identify your 

electronic comments by your name, 

date, and the docket number so the 

Agency can attach them to your 

comments. 

Because of security procedures, the 

use of regular mail may cause a 

significant delay in the receipt of 

comments. For information about 

security procedures concerning the 

delivery of materials by hand, express 

delivery, messenger, or courier service, 

please contact the OSHA Docket Office 

at (202) 693–2350 (TTY (877) 889– 

5627). 

Comments and submissions are 

posted without change at http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Therefore, OSHA 

cautions commenters about submitting 

personal information such as social 

security numbers and date of birth. 

Although all submissions are listed in 

the http://www.regulations.gov index, 

some information (e.g., copyrighted 

material) is not publically available to 

read or download through this Web site. 

All submissions, including copyrighted 

material, are available for inspection 

and copying at the OSHA Docket Office. 

Information on using the http:// 

www.regulations.gov Web site to submit 

comments and access the docket is 

available through the Web site’s ‘‘User 

Tips’’ link. Contact the OSHA Docket 

Office for information about materials 

not available through the Web Site, and 

for assistance in using the Internet to 

locate docket submissions. 

V. Authority and Signature 

Jordan Barab, Acting Assistant 

Secretary of Labor for Occupational 

Safety and Health, directed the 

preparation of this notice. The authority 

for this notice is the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506 

et seq.) and Secretary of Labor’s Order 

No. 5–2007 (72 FR 31160). 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 4th day of 

August 2009. 

Jordan Barab, 

Acting Assistant Secretary of Labor for 

Occupational Safety and Health. 

[FR Doc. E9–19072 Filed 8–7–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–26–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[NRC–2009–0348; Docket No. 50–443] 

FPL Energy Seabrook, LLC, et al.*; 

Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1; 

Environmental Assessment and 

Finding of No Significant Impact 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission (NRC) is considering 

issuance of an amendment for Facility 

Operating License No. NPF–86, issued 

to FLP Energy Seabrook, LLC (the 

licensee), for operation of the Seabrook 

Station, Unit No. 1, located in 

Rockingham County, New Hampshire. 

Therefore, as required by 10 CFR 51.21, 

the NRC is issuing this environmental 

assessment and finding of no significant 

impact. 

Environmental Assessment 

Identification of the Proposed Action 

The proposed action would change 

the legal name of the Licensee and Coowner from ‘‘FPL Energy Seabrook, 

LLC’’ to ‘‘NextEra Energy Seabrook, 

LLC.’’ 

The proposed action is in accordance 

with the licensee’s application dated 

April 16, 2009. 

The Need for the Proposed Action 

The proposed action is necessary to 

reflect the legal change of name of the 

Licensee and Co-Owner on April 16, 

2009. 

Environmental Impacts of the Proposed 

Action 

The NRC has concluded in its safety 

evaluation of the proposed action that 


rmajette on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
39980 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 152 / Monday, August 10, 2009 / Notices 

1Notice of the United States Postal Service of 

Filing of Changes in Rates Not of General 

Applicability, July 28, 2009 (Notice). 

2See PRC Order No. 162, Docket Nos. MC2009– 

10, CP2009–12, Order Adding Inbound 

International Expedited Services 2 To Competitive 

Product List, December 31, 2008. 

since this action is for a name change 

only that (1) there is a reasonable 

assurance that the health and safety of 

the public will not be endangered by 

operation in the proposed manner, (2) 

such activities will be conducted in 

compliance with the Commission’s 

regulations, and (3) the issuance of the 

amendments will not be inimical to the 

common defense and security or to the 

health and safety of the public. 

The details of the staff’s safety 

evaluation will be provided in the 

license amendment that will be issued 

as part of the letter to the licensee 

approving the license amendment. 

The proposed action will not 

significantly increase the probability or 

consequences of accidents. No changes 

are being made in the types of effluents 

that may be released offsite. There is no 

significant increase in the amount of 

any effluent released offsite. There is no 

significant increase in individual or 

cumulative occupational radiation 

exposure. Therefore, there are no 

significant radiological environmental 

impacts associated with the proposed 

action. 

With regard to potential nonradiological impacts, the proposed 

action does not have a potential to affect 

any historic sites. It does not affect nonradiological plant effluents and has no 

other environmental impact. Therefore, 

there are no significant non-radiological 

environmental impacts associated with 

the proposed action. 

Accordingly, the NRC concludes that 

there are no significant environmental 

impacts associated with the proposed 

action. 

Environmental Impacts of the 

Alternatives to the Proposed Action 

As an alternative to the proposed 

action, the staff considered denial of the 

proposed action (i.e., the ‘‘no-action’’ 

alternative). Denial of the application 

would result in no change in current 

environmental impacts. The 

environmental impacts of the proposed 

action and the alternative action are 

similar. 

Alternative Use of Resources 

The action does not involve the use of 

any different resources than those 

previously considered in the Final 

Environmental Statement for the 

Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1, NUREG– 

0895, dated December 1982. 

Agencies and Persons Consulted 

In accordance with its stated policy, 

on July 16, 2009, the staff consulted 

with the New Hampshire and 

Massachusetts State officials, Messrs. M. 

Nawoj and J. Giarrusso, respectively, 

regarding the environmental impact of 

the proposed action. Neither State 

official had any comments. 

Finding of No Significant Impact 

On the basis of the environmental 

assessment, the NRC concludes that the 

proposed action will not have a 

significant effect on the quality of the 

human environment. Accordingly, the 

NRC has determined not to prepare an 

environmental impact statement for the 

proposed action. 

For further details with respect to the 

proposed action, see the licensee’s letter 

dated April 16, 2009. Documents may 

be examined, and/or copied for a fee, at 

the NRC’s Public Document Room 

(PDR), located at One White Flint North, 

Public File Area O1 F21, 11555 

Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, 

Maryland. Publicly available records 

will be accessible electronically from 

the Agencywide Documents Access and 

Management System (ADAMS) Public 

Electronic Reading Room on the Internet 

at the NRC Web site, http:// 

www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. 

Persons who do not have access to 

ADAMS or who encounter problems in 

accessing the documents located in 

ADAMS should contact the NRC PDR 

Reference staff by telephone at 1–800– 

397–4209 or 301–415–4737, or send an 

e-mail to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 31st day 

of July 2009. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Dennis Egan, 

Senior Project Manager, Plant Licensing 

Branch 1–2, Division of Operating Reactor 

Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor 

Regulation. 

[FR Doc. E9–19056 Filed 8–7–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION 

[Docket No. CP2009–57; Order No. 271] 

International Mail Product 

AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Postal Service recently 

filed with the Commission notice of 

changes in rates for Inbound 

International Expedited Services 2. This 

document establishes a docket for 

consideration of the filing, provides 

public notice of the filing, and invites 

public comment. 

DATES: Comments are due August 12, 

2009. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments 

electronically via the Commission’s 

Filing Online system at http:// 

www.prc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel, 

at 202–789–6820 or 

stephen.sharfman@prc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Introduction 

II. Background 

III. Notice of Filing 

IV. Supplemental Information 

V. Ordering Paragraphs 

I. Introduction 

On July 28, 2009, the Postal Service 

filed a notice announcing changes in 

rates not of general applicability for 

Inbound International Expedited 

Services 2 effective January 1, 2010.1

The Postal Service attached a redacted 

copy of the 2010 rates and a certified 

statement establishing compliance with 

39 U.S.C. 3633 and 39 CFR 3015.5(c)(2) 

to the Notice as Attachments 1 and 2, 

respectively. Id. at 2. The Postal Service 

also submitted a listing of countries in 

each pricing tier and incorporated by 

reference the description of Inbound 

International Expedited Services 2 

contained in its supporting 

documentation filed in Docket Nos. 

MC2009–10 and CP2009–12. The Postal 

Service submitted the rates, related 

financial information, and certified 

statement required by 39 CFR 

3015.5(c)(2) under seal. 

II. Background 

The Notice states that in Docket No. 

MC2009–10, the Governors established 

prices and classifications not of general 

applicability for Inbound Express Mail 

International (EMS). In Order No. 162, 

the Commission added Inbound 

International Expedited Services 2 to 

the Competitive Product List as a new 

product under Express Mail, Inbound 

International Expedited Services.2 The 

rates took effect on January 1, 2009. 

In accordance with the provisions of 

the EMS Cooperative of the Universal 

Postal Union (UPU), rates for the 

delivery of inbound Express Mail 

International must be communicated to 

the UPU by August 31 of the year before 

which they are to take effect. As a 

member of the EMS Cooperative, the 

Postal Service may not change its rates 

for the coming year after August 31. In 

Order No. 162, the Commission raised 

concerns with filing these rates with the 


rmajette on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICES