alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IA

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 171

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to permit

the Congress to limit contributions and expenditures in elections for

Federal office.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 29, 1996

Mr. LANTOS submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States to permit the Congress to limit contributions and

expenditures in elections for Federal office.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each house concurring therein), That the following

4 article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution

5 of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents

6 and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by

7 the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States with8 in seven years from the date of its submission by the Con9 gress:
2

HJ 171 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE—

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. The Congress shall have the power to

3 set limits on expenditures made by, in support of, or in

4 opposition to the nomination or election of any person to

5 Federal office.

6 ‘‘SECTION 2. The Congress shall have the power to

7 set limits on contributions by individuals or entities by,

8 in support of, or in opposition to the nomination or elec9 tion of any person to Federal office.

10 ‘‘SECTION 3. The Congress shall have the power to

11 enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this

12 article.’’.

Æ
February
      28, 2007

    


    


    Dr.
      Stephen Chang

    President
      & CEO

    MultiCell
      Technologies, Inc.

    701
      George Washington Highway

    Lincoln,
      RI 02865

    


    Re:
      Escrow Common Shares

    


    Dear
      Stephen:

    


    Reference
      is made to the 7 3⁄4 % Convertible Debenture dated February 28, 2007 (the
“Convertible Debenture”) issued by MultiCell Technologies, Inc. (“Company”) to
      La Jolla Cove Investors, Inc. (“Holder”). Capitalized terms used herein and not
      otherwise defined herein shall have the definitions set forth in the Convertible
      Debenture.

    


    Upon
      notification and verification that the Registration Statement for the Conversion
      Shares has been declared effective by the SEC (such date, the “Effective Date”),
      and such shares can legally be issued to Holder, the Company shall immediately
      deliver that number of the Company’s registered Common Shares (in 50
      certificates of equal amount) equal to $1,000,000 divided by the average of
      the
      closing prices of the Company’s Common Shares for the five Trading Days prior to
      the Effective Date according to the following schedule: (i) $187,500 worth
      of
      Common Shares three (3) days after the Effective Date; (ii) $187,500 worth
      of
      Common Shares thirty (30) days after the Effective Date; and (iii) $375,000
      worth of Common Shares sixty (60) days after the Effective Date. All such Common
      Shares shall be registered in the name of La Jolla Cove Investors, Inc., and
      transferred to Merrill Lynch (“Escrow Agent”) by DWAC, who shall hold the shares
      in trust as a joint escrow agent for the Company and Holder. The delivery of
      such shares shall occur as prescribed above, and prior to or concurrently with
      the funding by Holder to the Escrow Agent of the remainder of the Purchase
      Price. Such shares may only be released by the Escrow Agent pursuant to valid
      Debenture conversions notices submitted by Holder. Any shares not released
      to
      Holder for Debenture conversions shall be returned to the Company. It is
      understood that Holder shall not be considered the owner of the Common Shares
      held in escrow, and Holder agrees that it will not vote the shares in escrow
      or
      exercise any control whatsoever over such shares until such times as the shares
      are released to Holder by the Escrow Agent.

    


    Sincerely,

    


    /s/T.W.
      Huff

    


    Travis
      W.
      Huff

    Portfolio
      Manager

    


    


    ACKNOWLEDGED
      AND AGREED:

    


    MultiCell
      Technologies, Inc.

    


    By:
      /s/Stephen
      MW Chang

    


    Title:
      Portfolio
      Manager
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Aerial lifts [electronicresource] : safety tips = Jirifas : consejos de seguridad.**
 
English | Espanol
 
SuDoc Number:L 35.2:SCA 2
Item Number:0765 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000625009
 
December 28, 2017
I 

COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA 

D•>llglas W Domenech 

Secretory of Natural ResouJces 

DEPARTMENT OF ElVVIROtVMEVTAL QU LITV 

Slreet c.JCidreso;. 629 East Main Srreet. Richmond Virginia 23219 

1\1/uilincr addreS.\" P.O. Box 1105 Riehm nd. Vu·ginia 2.>218 

Fa; (804) 698-4500 TDD (804) 698- 021 

www.deq. virgin ia.gov 

Ms. Diana Esher, Director 

Air Protection Division (3APOO) 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III 

1650 Arch Street 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029 

( 

R 

Dav1d K Pa) lor 

DircctL11 

i804) 698-401)0 

1-800-592-5482 

FE l ~ 2013 

Reference: Withdrawal of Certain 

Portions of the SIP Submittal for 

Major Source Permits, Revision All 

Dear Ms. Esher: 

On August 25, 2011, Virginia officially requested approval from the U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) of a revision to the Commonwealth of Virginia State Implementation 

Plan (SIP). The revision consisted primarily of amendments to major new source review 

permitting regulations for PSD and nonattainment areas (Articles 8 and 9 of 9V AC5 Chapter 80) 

as set out in 40 CFR 51.165 and 40 CFR 51.166. The amendments (i) establish the major source 

threshold, significant emissions rate, and offset ratios for particulate matter less than 2.5 

micrometers (PM2.s), interpollutant trading for offsets and applicability ofNSR to PM2.5 

precursors as promulgated by EPA on May 16, 2008 (73 FR 28321 ); and (ii) add maximum 

allowable increases in ambient pollutant concentrations (increments), significant impact levels 

(SILs), and a significant monitoring concentration (SMC) for PM2.s as promulgated by EPA on 

October 20, 2010 (75 FR 64864). EPA proposed approval of this submittal on August 1, 2012 

(77 FR 45523). 

On January 22, 2013 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit 

vacated and remanded to EPA policies establishing SILs for PM2.5 except for the parts of the rule 

codifying PM2.5 SILs in 40 CFR. § 51.165(b )(2). The court also found that EPA exceeded its 

Clean Air Act authority in establishing PM2.s SMCs and vacated that rule as well. There is 

therefore no longer any underlying legal basis for the corresponding provisions in the Virginia 

rules. Therefore, the Commonwealth hereby requests to withdraw paragraph A(2) of section 
9V AC5-80-1715 and the exemption relating to PM2.5 at paragraph E(l) of section 9V AC5-80-

1695 from the August 25, 201 1 SlP submittal. 

If you have any questions or need additional information, please let us know. 

DKP\k.gs 

TEMPLA TES\SIP-REG\REGOOw 

SIP\MAJOR NSR\A II w-SIP.DOC 

~:J9!f¥_ David K. Paylor
Order entered January 23, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 14

- 00920

- CV

RODRICK SAMPLES, Appellant

V.

THE DALLAS COUNTY SP ECIAL CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, ET A L ., Appellee s

On Appeal from the 160th Judicial Distr ict Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC12

- 11245



### O RDER

We GRANT appellees’ January 21, 2015 second motion for an extension of time to file a

brief. Appellees shall file their brief by FEBRUARY 23, 2015

.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
#### § 25.2512-1 Valuation of property; in general.

Section 2512 provides that if a gift is made in property, its value at the date of the gift shall be considered the amount of the gift. The value of the property is the price at which such property would change hands between a willing buyer and a willing seller, neither being under any compulsion to buy or to sell, and both having reasonable knowledge of relevant facts. The value of a particular item of property is not the price that a forced sale of the property would produce. Nor is the fair market value of an item of property the sale price in a market other than that in which such item is most commonly sold to the public, taking into account the location of the item wherever appropriate. Thus, in the case of an item of property made the subject of a gift, which is generally obtained by the public in the retail market, the fair market value of such an item of property is the price at which the item or a comparable item would be sold at retail. For example, the value of an automobile (an article generally obtained by the public in the retail market) which is the subject of a gift, is the price for which an automobile of the same or approximately the same description, make, model, age, condition, etc., could be purchased by a member of the general public and not the price for which the particular automobile of the donor would be purchased by a dealer in used automobiles. Examples of items of property which are generally sold to the public at retail may be found in § 25.2512-6. The value is generally to be determined by ascertaining as a basis the fair market value at the time of the gift of each unit of the property. For example, in the case of shares of stocks or bonds, such unit of property is generally a share or a bond. Property shall not be returned at the value at which it is assessed for local tax purposes unless that value represents the fair market value thereof on the date of the gift. All relevant facts and elements of value as of the time of the gift shall be considered. Where the subject of a gift is an interest in a business, the value of items of property in the inventory of the business generally should be reflected in the value of the business. For valuation of interests in businesses, see § 25.2512-3. See § 25.2512-2 and §§ 25.2512-4 through 25.2512-6 for further information concerning the valuation of other particular kinds of property. See § 25.2702-6 for an adjustment to the total amount of an individual's taxable gifts where the individual's current taxable gifts include the transfer of certain interests in trust that were previously valued under the provisions of section 2702.

[T.D. 6826, 30 FR 7709, June 15, 1965, as amended by T.D. 8395, 57 FR 4254, Feb. 4, 1992]
IV

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 82

Directing the Secretary of the Senate to make technical corrections in the

enrollment of S. 523.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 11, 1995

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska submitted the following concurrent resolution; which

was considered and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Directing the Secretary of the Senate to make technical

corrections in the enrollment of S. 523.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill (S. 523)

3 to amend the Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Act

4 to authorize additional measures to carry out the control

5 of salinity upstream of Imperial Dam in a cost-effective

6 manner, and for other purposes, the Secretary of the Sen7 ate shall make the following corrections:

8 (1) In the last sentence of paragraph (1) of sec9 tion 1 of the bill (adding a new paragraph (6) to

10 section 202(a) of the Colorado River Basin Salinity
2

•HCON 82 ATH

1 Control Act) insert a period after the words ‘‘sub2 mits such report’’.

3 (2) In paragraph (2)(B) of section 1 of the bill

4 (amending section 205(a)(4)(i) of the Colorado River

5 Basin Salinity Control Act) strike ‘‘section 202(a)

6 (4) and (5)’’ and insert ‘‘sections 202(a) (4) and

7 (5)’’.

8 (3) At the end of paragraph (4) of section 1 of

9 the bill (amending section 202(b)(4) of the Colorado

10 River Basin Salinity Control Act) strike the period

11 before the closing quotation marks.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 150 (Thursday, August 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 39308]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18773]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive Patent License; AmberWave 
Systems Corporation

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DOD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy hereby gives notice of its intent 
to grant to AmberWave Systems Corporation, a revocable, nonassignable, 
exclusive license to practice in the field of use of substrates for 
optoelectronic devices, radio frequency amplifiers and power 
transistors; and of optoelectronic devices in the United States, the 
Government-owned inventions described in U.S. Patent No. 6,323,108: 
Fabrication of Ultra-Thin Bonded Semiconductor Layers, Navy Case No. 
78,980.//U.S. Patent No. 6,328,796: Single Crystal Material on Non-
Single Crystalline Substrate, Navy Case No. 78,978.//U.S. Patent No. 
6,497,763: Electronic Device with Composite Substrate, Navy Case No. 
82,672.//U.S. Patent No. 6,593,212: Method for Making Electro-Optical 
Devices Using a Hydrogen Ion Splitting Technique, Navy Case No. 
79,639.//U.S. Patent No. 7,358,152: Wafer Bonding of Thinned Electronic 
Materials and Circuits to High Performance Substrate, Navy Case No. 
84,023.//U.S. Patent No. 7,535,100: Wafer Bonding of Thinned Electronic 
Materials and Circuits to High Performance Substrates, Navy Case No. 
84,023 and any continuations, divisionals or re-issues thereof.

DATES: Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license must file 
written objections along with supporting evidence, if any, not later 
than August 21, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Written objections are to be filed with the Naval Research 
Laboratory, Code 1004, 4555 Overlook Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20375-
5320.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rita Manak, Head, Technology Transfer 
Office, NRL Code 1004, 4555 Overlook Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20375-
5320, telephone (202) 767-3083. Due to U.S. Postal delays, please fax 
(202) 404-7920, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#73011a07125d1e121d1218331d011f5d1d12050a5d1e1a1f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f98b908d98d79498979892b9978b95d797988f80d7949095">[email protected]</span></a> or use courier delivery 
to expedite response.

    Authority:  35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR Part 404.

    Dated: July 29, 2009.
A.M. Vallandingham,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-18773 Filed 8-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Memorandum U.S. Department of Transportation Officeofthe Secretary ofTransportation Subject:

From: To: Notice ofCommunication in Docket: DOT-OST-OST-2000-7182 Spechil Rules for Ronald Reagan Washingto Airport (within-perimeter exemptions) Secretary Ray LaHood Chief, Dockets In accordance withDepartmentrules (14 CFR Part 300), I am reporting the following communication. OnJanuary 30, 2013, during a telephone conversation with Representative Gene Green ofTexas, the Congressmanraised the subject ofthe Department's proceeding to allocate two slot exemptions for operations between Ronald Reagan WashingtonNational Airport (DCA) and airports within the 1,250-mile DCA perimeter. The Congressman expressed his support for Southwest Airlines' application to provide service between DCA and Houston's Hobby Airport. I informed the Congressmanthat, while I appreciated his interest in this case, I could not comment on its merits because the proceeding was under active consideration by the Department. Please place this memorandum in the appropriate Docket.

cc: Congressman Gene Green
10-B-i

APPENDIX 10-B. NATIONAL ENERGY SAVINGS AND NET PRESENT VALUE 

USING ALTERNATIVE ECONOMIC GROWTH SCENARIOS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

10-B.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 10-B-1

10-B.2 NIA RESULTS USING ALTERNATIVE GROWTH SCENARIOS ................ 10-B-2

LIST OF TABLES

Table 10-B.2.1 Cumulative National Energy Savings and Net Present Value of 

Consumer Benefits, High Economic Growth Scenario ........................... 10-B-2

Table 10-B.2.2 Cumulative National Energy Savings and Net Present Value of 

Consumer Benefits, Low Economic Growth Scenario............................ 10-B-3

LIST OF FIGURE

Figure 10-B.1.1 Housing Starts Forecast Under Alternative AEO2010 Economic 

Growth Scenarios..................................................................................... 10-B-1

Figure 10-B.1.2 Average Residential Electricity Price Forecasts under Alternative 

AEO2010 Economic Growth Scenarios .................................................. 10-B-2
10-B-1

APPENDIX 10-B. NATIONAL ENERGY SAVINGS AND NET PRESENT VALUE 

USING ALTERNATIVE ECONOMIC GROWTH SCENARIOS

10-B.1 INTRODUCTION

This appendix presents national energy savings (NES) and net present value 

(NPV) results using inputs from alternative economic growth scenarios. The scenarios 

use the energy price and housing starts forecasts in the High Economic Growth case and 

the Low Economic Growth case from EIA’s Annual Energy Outlook 2010 (AEO 2010).

i

Figures 10-B.1.1 and 10-B.1.2 show the forecasts for housing starts and 

residential electricity prices under the different economic growth scenarios. AEO2010

provides a forecast to 2035. To estimate the trend after 2035, DOE followed guidelines 

that the EIA had provided to the Federal Energy Management Program, which called for 

using the average rate of change for electricity during 2020–2035.

Figure 10-B.1.1 Housing Starts Forecast Under Alternative 

AEO2010 Economic Growth Scenarios
10-B-2

Figure 10-B.1.2 Average Residential Electricity Price 

Forecasts under Alternative AEO2010 

Economic Growth Scenarios

10-B.2 NIA RESULTS USING ALTERNATIVE GROWTH SCENARIOS

Table 10-B.2.1 Cumulative National Energy Savings and Net Present Value of 

Consumer Benefits, High Economic Growth Scenario

Trial 

Standard 

Level (TSL)

NES 

(Quads)

NPV (billion 2010$)

7% Discount 

Rate

3% Discount 

Rate

1 0.22 1.13 2.22

2 0.32 1.58 3.11

3 0.44 2.03 4.04

4 0.67 2.54 5.23
10-B-3

Table 10-B.2.2 Cumulative National Energy Savings and Net Present Value of 

Consumer Benefits, Low Economic Growth Scenario

Trial 

Standard 

Level (TSL)

NES 

(Quads)

NPV (billion 2010$)

7% Discount 

Rate

3% Discount 

Rate

1 0.20 0.92 1.76

2 0.28 1.27 2.46

3 0.39 1.62 3.17

4 0.60 1.98 4.00
10-B-4

REFERENCES

 i U.S. Department of Energy–Energy Information Administration. Annual Energy 

Outlook 2010 with Projections to 2035. May 2010. U.S. DOE–EIA: Washington, 

D.C. DOE/EIA-0383(2010).
IA

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 173

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to protect

the rights of victims of crime.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 22, 1996

Mr. HYDE introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States to protect the rights of victims of crime.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the follow4 ing article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitu5 tion of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents

6 and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by

7 the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States with8 in seven years after the date of its submission for ratifica9 tion:
2

•HJ 173 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE —

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. To insure that victims of crime are

3 treated with fairness, dignity, and respect, in each pros4 ecution by the United States or a State, for a crime either

5 involving violence or for which the defendant can be im6 prisoned for a period longer than one year, any victim of

7 the crime shall have the right to receive notice of, and

8 to be present at, every stage of the public proceedings,

9 unless the court determines there is good cause for the

10 victim not to be present; to comment at any such proceed11 ing involving the possible release of the defendant from

12 custody, the acceptance of any plea agreement with the

13 defendant, or the sentencing of the defendant; to be in14 formed of any release or escape of the defendant; to re15 ceive reasonable protection from physical harm or intimi16 dation relating to the proceedings; to have the proceedings

17 resolved in a prompt and timely manner; and to have the

18 court order restitution from the defendant upon convic19 tion.

20 ‘‘SECTION 2. The rights established in section 1 shall

21 be made available to victims upon request to the prosecut22 ing authority and in the manner provided by law under

23 section 3.

24 ‘‘SECTION 3. The legislatures of the States, with re25 spect to a proceeding in a State forum, and the Congress
3

•HJ 173 IH

1 with respect to a proceeding in a United States forum,

2 shall have the power to enforce this article by appropriate

3 legislation.’’.

Æ