alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 1 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 1

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas, on December 17, 1994, the helicopter of Army Chief Warrant Officer 
        David Hilemon and Army Chief Warrant Officer Bobby W. Hall II was shot 
        down over North Korea;
Whereas, as a result of this incident, Chief Warrant Officer Hilemon sacrificed 
        his life for his country and Chief Warrant Officer Hall was taken 
        captive by the Korean People's Army;
Whereas, on December 22, 1994, Chief Warrant Officer Hilemon's remains were 
        returned to the United States at the Demilitarized Zone at Panmunjom and 
        on December 28, 1994, he was laid to rest with full military honors and 
        in full view of Mt. Rainier in the State of Washington, in accordance 
        with the wishes of Chief Warrant Officer Hilemon; and
Whereas Chief Warrant Officer Hall, held in captivity for 13 days under 
        stressful circumstances, served his country above and beyond the call of 
        duty: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) recognizes the sacrifice of Army Chief Warrant Officer 
        David Hilemon to his country and expresses gratitude for his 
        selflessness and deepest regret for his loss to his family; and
            (2) recognizes the exceptional service of Army Chief 
        Warrant Officer Bobby W. Hall II to his country and expresses 
        commendation for his courage.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 5 (legislative 
      day, January 4), 1995.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
                                     

104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             H. CON. RES. 1

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 Recognizing the sacrifice and courage of Army Warrant Officers David 
Hilemon and Bobby W. Hall II, whose helicopter was shot down over North 
                      Korea on December 17, 1994.
```
§ 11.412(c)-7 Election to treat certain retroactive plan amendments as made on the first day of the plan year. ( a ) *General rule.* Under section 412(c)(8), a plan administrator may elect to have any amendment which is adopted after the close of the plan year to which it applies deemed to have been made on the first day of such plan year if the amendment— ( 1 ) Is adopted no later than 2 and one-half months after the close of such plan year (or, in the case of a multiemployer plan, no later than 2 years after the close of such plan year),
( 2 ) Does not reduce the accrued benefit of any participant determined as of the beginning of such plan year, and
( 3 ) Does not reduce the accrued benefit of any participant determined as of the time of adoption of the amendment, or, if it does so reduce such accrued benefit, it is shown that the plan administrator filed a notice with the Secretary of Labor notifying him of the amendment, and— ( i ) The Secretary of Labor approved the amendment, or
( ii ) The Secretary of Labor failed to disapprove the amendment within 90 days after the date on which the notice was filed.
( b ) *Time and manner of making election.* ( 1 ) The election under section 412(c)(8) shall be made by the plan administrator by a statement of election described in subparagraph (3) of this paragraph, attached to the annual return relating to minimum funding standards required to be filed under section 6058 with respect to the plan year to which the election relates.
( 2 ) In the event that an amendment to which paragraph (a) of this section applies is adopted after the filing of the annual return required under section 6058, the plan administrator may make the election under section 412(c)(8) by attaching a statement of election, described in paragraph (b)(3) of this section, to a copy of such annual return, and filing such copy no later than the time allowed for the filing of such returns under section 6058. (In the case of multiemployer plans, such copy may be filed within a 24 month period beginning with the date prescribed for the filing of such returns.)
( 3 ) The statement of election filed by or on behalf of the plan administrator shall— ( i ) State the date of the close of the first plan year to which the amendment applies and the date on which the amendment was adopted;
( ii ) Contain a statement that the amendment does not reduce the accrued benefit of any participant determined as of the beginning of the plan year preceding the plan year in which the amendment is adopted; and
( iii ) Contain either— ( A ) A statement that the amendment does not reduce the accrued benefit of any participant determined as of the time of adoption of such amendment, or
( B ) A copy of the notice filed with the Secretary of Labor under section 412(c)(8) and a statement that either the Secretary of Labor has approved the amendment or he has failed to act within 90 days after notification of the amendment.
[T.D. 7338, 39 FR 44751, Dec. 27, 1974]
----

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 September 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-49/06) (1)

(Failure of member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 1999/37/EC - Registration documents for vehicles - Failure to transpose within the period prescribed)

(2006/C 294/30)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: N. Yerrell, Agent)

Defendant: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (represented by: S. Schreiner, Agent)

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to adopt, within the period prescribed, the provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 1999/37/EC of 29 April 1999 on the registration documents for vehicles (OJ 1999 L 138, p. 57)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

----

(1)OJ C 60, 11. 03. 2006.

----
<PAGE>




                                  Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Milestone Scientific Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the Nine months ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Leonard
Osser, Chief Executive Officer of Milestone, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of Milestone.


                              /s/ Leonard Osser
                              ----------------------
                              Leonard Osser
                              Chief Executive Officer
                              November 20, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 230 Received in Senate (RDS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 230

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 30, 1996

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for the sine die adjournment of the second session of the One 
                        Hundred Fourth Congress.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Monday, 
September 30, 1996, or of Tuesday, October 1, 1996, on a motion offered 
pursuant to this concurrent resolution by the Majority Leader, or his 
designee, it stand adjourned sine die, or until noon on the second 
day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of 
this concurrent resolution, and that when the Senate adjourns on 
Monday, September 30, 1996, or Tuesday, October 1, 1996, on a motion 
offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by the Majority Leader, 
or his designee, it stand adjourned sine die, or until noon on the 
second day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 
2 of this concurrent resolution.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, 
in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002



---

In connection with the Quarterly Report of HQ Sustainable Maritime Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Norbert Sporns, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 11, 2006



/s/ Norbert SpornsNorbert SpornsChief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

The undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer of HQ Sustainable Maritime Industries, Inc. (the Company), certifies that, to his knowledge on
the date of this certification:



|1. | This Quarterly Report on Form 10Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The foregoing certifications are made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350) and shall
not be relied upon for any other purpose.

Dated: November 9, 2010



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Norbert Sporns     
|Norbert Sporns         
|Chief Executive Officer
#### § 44.4413-1 Certain provisions made applicable.

For regulations under sections 4901, 4902, 4904, 4905, and 4906, as extended and made applicable to the special tax imposed by section 4411 and to the persons upon whom such tax is imposed, see Subpart D of this part.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Larry Barrett, Appellant.

[804 NYS2d 274]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (DiFiore, J.), rendered May 6, 2004, convicting him of attempted robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Schmidt, J.P., S. Miller, Mastro, Spolzino and Lunn, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 35.1








ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC








The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer pursuant to Section 3.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2015 (the "Sale and Servicing Agreement") among CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2015-4, as Issuer (the "Issuer"), CarMax Auto Funding LLC, as Depositor, and CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer (the "Servicer"), does hereby certify that:





|   |                                                                                                              
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | CarMax Business Services, LLC is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.




|   |                                                                                      
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate.




|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|3. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period beginning on October 28, 2015 and ending on February 29, 2016 and of the Servicer's performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement was made under my supervision.  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout such period.







Capitalized terms used in this certificate and not otherwise defined herein have the meanings assigned to them in the Sale and Servicing Agreement.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of the Servicer, has duly executed this Officer's Certificate this 20th day of May, 2016.





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC





/s/ Andrew J. McMonigle


Andrew J. McMonigle


Vice President, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.7454-2 Burden of proof in foundation manager, etc. cases. ( a ) *Foundation manager.* In any proceeding involving the issue whether a foundation manager as defined in section 4946(b) has “knowingly” participated in an act of self-dealing within the meaning of section 4941, participated in an investment which jeopardizes the carrying out of exempt purposes within the meaning of section 4944, or agreed to the making of a taxable expenditure within the meaning of section 4945 or whether an organization manager (as defined in section 4958(f)(2)) has “knowingly” participated in an excess benefit transaction (as defined in section 4958(c)), the burden of proof in respect of such issue shall be upon the Commissioner.
( b ) *Trustee of a black lung benefit trust.* In any proceeding involving the issue whether a trustee of a trust described in section 501(c)(21) has “knowingly” participated in an act of self-dealing within the meaning of section 4951 or agreed to the making of a taxable expenditure within the meaning of section 4952, the burden of proof in respect of such issue shall be upon the Commissioner.
[T.D. 7838, 47 FR 44253, Oct. 7, 1982, as amended by T.D. 8920, 66 FR 2171, Jan. 10, 2001]
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Encorium Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Niklas Tevajärvi, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Niklas TevajärviNiklas TevajärviPrincipal Accounting Officer





May 3, 2011





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM SULLIVAN
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.'S UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR
THE NINE MONTH PERIOD  ENDED  DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                              0000856710
<NAME>                             SULLIVAN COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                       1,000
<CURRENCY>                         U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                     APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                       DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                          1
<CASH>                                   0
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                       60,637
<ALLOWANCES>                         6,279
<INVENTORY>                         10,388
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    75,099
<PP&E>                             235,870
<DEPRECIATION>                      66,327
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     344,541
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               82,924
<BONDS>                            185,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<COMMON>                                 1
<OTHER-SE>                         (63,937)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       344,541
<SALES>                            414,671
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   414,671
<CGS>                              362,069
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      362,069
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        85
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     2,640
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  27,233
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (17,189)
<INCOME-TAX>                         2,302
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (19,491)
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                       (19,491)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0
        

</TABLE>
SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


      THIS  SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the "Second
Amendment") is entered into as of January 17, 2007 by and between
Seaboard  Marine Ltd., a Liberian corporation, together with  any
successor   thereto,  the  "Company,"  and  Edward  A.   Gonzalez
("Executive").

                      W I T N E S S E T H:

     WHEREAS, the Company and Executive entered into that certain
Employment Agreement ("Employment Agreement") dated as of July 1,
2005,  which  was amended pursuant to that certain  Amendment  to
Employment Agreement dated August 8, 2006 (the "Amendment");

      WHEREAS, it was intended that the Amendment also set  forth
an  amendment to Section 10 of the Employment Agreement to extend
the "Non-Compete Period";

      WHEREAS,  the  Company and Executive desire  to  amend  the
Employment Agreement, as amended, as set forth herein;

      NOW,  THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises  and  the
mutual  covenants and promises contained herein,  and  Employee's
continued employment hereunder, and for further good and valuable
consideration, the Company and Executive hereby agree as follows:

     1.   Amendment to Paragraph 10.   The  definition  of  "Non-
Compete Period" or "Non-Solicitation Period," as set   forth   in
paragraph  10(a)  of  the Employment Agreement,  as  amended,  is
amended and restated to read as follows:

          (a)   "Non-Compete  Period"  or  "Non-Solicitation
     Period"   means   the   period   beginning   with   the
     Commencement  Date  and ending on:  (x)  the  two  year
     anniversary  date  of  the  Date  of  Termination  with
     respect  to  any  termination  of  employment  by   the
     Executive pursuant to Section 8(d) above by Executive's
     resignation other than for Good Reason; or (y) the  one
     (1)  year  anniversary date of the Date of  Termination
     with  respect  to any other termination  of  employment
     hereunder.

     2.   Agreement Continues in Effect.   Except  as  set  forth
herein, the Employment Agreement shall continue in full force and
effect pursuant to its terms.

     3.    Miscellaneous.  This Amendment shall be  governed  and
construed  in accordance with the laws of the State  of  Florida,
without  reference  to  principles of  conflict  of  laws.   This
Amendment   may   be  executed  in  counterparts  (including   by
facsimile), each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of
which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

<PAGE>

     IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the Company has  duly  executed  this
Agreement  by  its authorized representative, and  Executive  has
hereto set his hand, in each case, effective as of the date first
above written.

                                   SEABOARD MARINE LTD.



                                   By:  /s/ Robert L. Steer
                                        Robert L. Steer, Vice President


                                   EXECUTIVE:



                                   By:  /s/ Edward A. Gonzalez
                                        Edward A. Gonzalez