alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
!

!

!

!

!

!

¬«3

£¤97

§ ̈¦5

¬«96

§ ̈¦5

Happy Camp

Callahan

Ft. Jones

Yreka

Weed

Goosenest

The Klamath National Forest cannot assure the acuracy of this information

for a particular purpose. Original data may have been compiled from various

sources. Spatial information may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards.

This information may be updated without notification.

Project Area

0 0.5 1 2

Miles Da

®

te: 3/8/2017

HORSE CREEK COMMUNITY PROTECTION AND FOREST RESTORATION PROJECT

ALTERNATIVE 2

Happy Camp/Oak Knoll Ranger District

Klamath National Forest

Klamath NF Rouge River - Siskiyou NF

T45 N

R11 W

T45 N

R10 W

T45 N R11 W

T46 N R11 W

T46 N

R10 W

T46 N

R9 W

T46 N R10 W

T47 N R10 W

T46 N R10 W

T45 N R10 W

T46 N

R10 W

T46 N

R11 W

T46 N

R9 W

T47 N

R9 W

T47 N

R10 W

T47 N

R11 W

T47 N

R10 W

T47 N

R9 W

T46 N

R11 W

T47 N

R11 W

20

33

16

27

2

35

14

11

12

12

36

6

21

9

15

11

12

1

24

7

5

21

16

28

14

18

31

19

7

8

16

4

10

3

23

1

24

30

7

19

5

8

4

15

22

15

2

11

23

35

30

7

18

7

29

32

29

5

28

4

34

22

22

10

36

25

13

7

6

6

32

9

33

3 2

2

23

24

31

24

9

11

26

2

35

12

12

31

31

8

28

10

10

26

5

33

4

27

27

11

1

6

6

29

8

32

20

5

4

3

3

10

25

1

30

6

20

17

5

16

33

3

34

3

2

23

2

25

18

29

9

9

34

34

11

36

26 25

1

1

13

6

9

35

26

14

36

7

17

17

21

4

27

22

13

1

19

12

32

17

8

20

8

28

21

15

10

14

13

19

30

18

118.94

118.95

117.24

115.38

118.96

118.93

118.97

115.33

116.50

118.62

117.23

118.58

117.20 117.21

117.15

117.16

118.04

118.26

117.19

118.05

118.06

118.03

118.07

118.09

117.18

117.14

117.17

118.12

118.60

118.59

117.22

115.35

115.32

115.31

116.49

118.64 118.63

118.57

115.34

118.27

115.36

117.24

Horse Creek Project Alternative 2

Salvage Harvest Skyline (Cable)

Salvage Harvest Ground-Based

Site Preparation and Planting (without salvage)

HorseCreekSIA

Fuels Zone 1

Roadside Fuels Treatment

Private Property 1

Project Boundary

SalvageTemporary Roads

Roadside Hazard Tree Removal

SIA Temporary Roads
Exhibit 32

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned
officers of Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 (the Form 10-Q), of the Company fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: October 31, 2012



By:

/s/ William J. DoyleWilliam J. Doyle
President and Chief Executive Officer


Date: October 31, 2012



By:

/s/ Wayne R. BrownleeWayne R. Brownlee
Executive Vice President, Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of
Regulation S-K, section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 191 (Monday, October 3, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 61134]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-25436]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7920]

Waiver of Restriction on Assistance to the Central Government of 
Angola

    Pursuant to Section 7086(c)(2) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2010 (Div. F, Pub. 
L. 111-117), as carried forward by the Full-Year Continuing 
Appropriations Act, 2011 (Div. B, Pub. L. 112-10) (``the Act''), and 
Department of State Delegation of Authority Number 245-1, I hereby 
determine that it is important to the national interest of the United 
States to waive the requirements of Section 7086(c)(1) of the Act with 
respect to Angola and I hereby waive such restriction.
    This determination shall be reported to the Congress, and published 
in the Federal Register.

    Dated: July 20, 2011.
Thomas Nides,
Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources.
[FR Doc. 2011-25436 Filed 9-30-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-26-P
```
#### Hoesie et al. v. Yorke

*240
      *Thomas I. Guerin,*for plaintiffs.

*Philip S. Polis,*for defendant.

*James E. Grant,*for garnishee.

September 3, 1952.

Alessandroni, J.,

Plaintiffs filed a complaint in assumpsit seeking the recovery of certain moneys deposited with defendant. Defendant filed an answer and counterclaim. The cause was tried by a judge and jury. Judgments were entered on the verdicts of the jury which were based on special findings. Judgment was entered for defendant on plaintiffs’ claim and for plaintiffs on defendant’s counterclaim. Costs were taxed by the prothonotary. Defendant issued a fi. fa. for costs and plaintiffs satisfied the claim by payment to the sheriff. Plaintiffs subsequently issued attachment sur judgment for costs against defendant. Defendant petitioned for a rule to show cause why the attachment should not be dissolved.

Plaintiffs first argue that this is a collateral attack on the judgment. It is difficult to appreciate the force of this argument. Nowhere has the judgment on defendant’s counterclaim been attacked directly or indirectly. Hence, there is no merit in this contention.

The only question is that of the costs. Normally, costs follow the judgment: 15 Standard Pa. Practice 456. The statutes dealing with costs are to be liberally construed to justly compensate parties who have been obliged to incur expenses in prosecuting lawful claims or defending against unjust claims: Tunison v. Commonwealth, 347 Pa. 76.

Stahl et al. v. Erie Delivery Company, 31 D. *&*C. 429, contains a review of the decisions on this point *241of several other jurisdictions. The court there adopted the rule that where there is a complaint followed by a cross-complaint (that case dealt with a trespass action) and both parties suffered adverse verdicts on their respective complaints, plaintiff, the aggressor, was bound to pay the costs. With the court’s conclusion, we agree.

Although it is a matter of conjecture, as far as the record is concerned, we must conclude that the cross-complaint, here the counterclaim, would not have been filed but for plaintiff’s action. Since he is the aggressor, and since he, further, suffers an adverse verdict, he must bear the costs. In the instant case, plaintiffs suffered defeat; the fact that they defeated defendant’s counterclaim does not alter the result. Plaintiffs forced defendant to come into court. Such action, plus the failure to prevail, requires that they pay the costs. Under such circumstances, defendant is not liable for costs even though his counterclaim is defeated.

*Order*

And now, to wit, September 3,1952, defendant’s rule to show cause why the attachment sur judgment should not be dissolved is made absolute.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         416,852
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,404,706
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,821,558
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          502,182
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,319,376
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,821,558
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               120,522
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               39,262
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   81,260
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .00


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Corey C., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[805 NYS2d 622]

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, *462Queens County (Hunt, J.), dated May 19, 2004, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated December 15, 2003, made after a hearing, finding that the appellant committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of menacing in the third degree, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent and placed him on probation for a period of 18 months. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order dated December 15, 2003.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The evidence adduced at the fact-finding hearing, viewed in the light most favorable to the presentment agency, was legally sufficient to establish that the appellant committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of menacing in the third degree *(see Matter of Jatari W.,*18 AD3d 767 [2005]; *Matter of Louis C.,*6 AD3d 430 [2004]; *cf People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]).

Moreover, resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the trier of fact, which saw and heard the witnesses. Its determination should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see Matter of Jabari W., supra; Matter of James B.,*262 AD2d 480, 481 [1999]). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the findings of fact were not against the weight of the evidence *(see*Family Ct Act § 342.2 [2]; *cf.*CPL 470.15 [5]). Schmidt, J.P., S. Miller, Santucci and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 72 Engrossed in House (EH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 72

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, May 
25, 1995, it stand adjourned until noon on Tuesday, June 6, 1995, or 
until noon on the second day after Members are notified to reassemble 
pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs 
first; and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of 
business on Thursday, May 25, 1995, Friday, May 26, 1995, or Saturday, 
May 27, 1995, pursuant to a motion made by the majority leader or his 
designee, in accordance with this resolution, it stand recessed or 
adjourned until 10 a.m. on Monday, June 5, 1995, or until noon on the 
second day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 
2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the majority leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the minority leader of 
the House and the minority leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, 
in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
            Passed the House of Representatives May 25, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
                                     

104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 72

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

            Providing for the adjournment of the two Houses.
```
§ 31.6302-3 Federal tax deposit rules for amounts withheld under the backup withholding requirements of section 3406 for payments made after December 31, 1992. ( a ) *General rule.* The rules of § 31.6302-1 shall apply to determine the time and manner of making deposits of amounts withheld under the backup withholding requirements of section 3406.
( b ) *Treatment of backup withholding amounts separately.* A taxpayer that withholds income tax under section 3406 with respect to reportable payments made after December 31, 1992, and before January 1, 1994, may, in accordance with the instructions provided with Form 941, deposit such tax under the rules of § 31.6302-1 without taking into account the other taxes described in paragraph (e) of § 31.6302-1 for purposes of determining when tax withheld under section 3406 must be deposited. A taxpayer that treats backup withholding amounts separately with respect to reportable payments made after December 31, 1992, and before January 1, 1994, shall not take tax withheld under section 3406 into account for purposes of determining when the other taxes described in paragraph (e) of § 31.6302-1 must otherwise be deposited under that section. See § 31.6302-4 for rules regarding the deposit of income tax withheld under section 3406 with respect to reportable payments made after December 31, 1993.
( c ) *Example.* The following example illustrates the provisions of this section.
Example. For the last two calendar quarters of 1991 and the first two calendar quarters of 1992, Bank *A* reports employment taxes with respect to wages paid totalling in excess of $50,000. For the same four quarters, pursuant to section 3406, *A* withholds income tax with respect to dividend payments in an amount aggregating less than $50,000. For deposit and reporting purposes, *A* treated the backup withholding amounts separately from the employment taxes with respect to wages paid. Accordingly, for calendar year 1993, if *A* chooses to treat the items separately, *A* must use the Semi-Weekly rule of § 31.6302-1(c)(2) to deposit taxes with respect to wages paid but may use the Monthly rule of § 31.6302-1(c)(1) for the deposit of backup withholding amounts. If *A* chooses not to treat the items separately, the Semi-Weekly rule would apply to the combined amount of both the taxes with respect to wages paid and the backup withholding amounts.
[T.D. 8436, 57 FR 44106, Sept. 24, 1992, as amended by T.D. 8504, 58 FR 68035, Dec. 23, 1993]
§ 48.4061(b)-3 Rebuilt, reconditioned, or repaired parts or accessories. ( a ) *Rebuilt parts or accessories.* Rebuilding of automobile parts or accessories, as distinguished from reconditioning or repairing, constitutes manufacturing, and the rebuilder of such parts or accessories is liable for the tax imposed by section 4061(b) with respect to his sales of such rebuilt parts or accessories. Reboring or other machining, rewinding, and comparable major operations constitute rebuilding. The person owning the part or accessory being rebuilt is the manufacturer of the article and is liable for the tax on his sale of the rebuilt part or accessory. The tax attaches whether the machining or other operation is performed by the rebuilder himself or by some other person in his behalf. For example, the tax attaches with respect to sales of ( 1 ) rebuilt batteries,
( 2 ) rebabbited or machined connecting rods,
( 3 ) reassembled clutches after operations such as the resurfacing of clutch plates,
( 4 ) rewound armatures,
( 5 ) reassembled generators with armatures rewound by or for the person reassembling the generator,
( 6 ) reground or remetalized crankshafts, and
( 7 ) engines in which blocks are machined (such as cylinders rebored or new sleeves inserted with or without cylinders being rebored) or new blocks installed. For provisions relating to the sale price of rebuilt parts or accessories, see § 48.4062(b)-1.
( b ) *Reconditioned parts or accessories.* The mere disassembling, cleaning, and reassembling (with any necessary replacements of worn parts) of automobile parts or accessories, such as fuel pumps, water pumps, carburetors, distributors, shock absorbers, windshield-wiper motors, brake shoes, clutch disks, voltage regulators, and other parts or accessories, are regarded as reconditioning operations rather than the manufacturing or production of rebuilt parts or accessories. The sale of a reconditioned part or accessory is not subject to tax if previous to the reconditioning there had been a prior sale of such part or accessory in the United States. Any new taxable parts or accessories produced, or purchased tax free for use in further manufacture, and used as replacements in reconditioning such units are subject to tax when used by the reconditioner.
( c ) *Repaired parts or accessories.* The tax does not apply to the amount paid for the repair of automobile parts or accessories for the owner thereof. Repairing consists of the restoration, whether by rebuilding or reconditioning, of an owner's part or accessory to usable condition for his own use rather than for sale. The person who performs the repairing must retain in his possession evidence or documents from which the nontaxable nature of the operation can be ascertained. Any person engaged in rebuilding parts or accessories for purposes of sale incurs liability for tax with respect to his own use of any part or accessory rebuilt by him for sale.
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Properties III
L.P. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 29, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Neal Ludeke, Chief Financial Officer of Richman Housing Credits
Inc., general partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties III L.P., general partner
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to
(S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Neal Ludeke
---------------------------------------
Neal Ludeke
Chief Financial Officer of Richman
Housing Credits Inc., general partner of
Richman Tax Credit Properties III L.P.,
general partner of the Company
February 13, 2003
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.7701-16 Other terms.

For a definition of the term “withholding agent” see § 1.1441-7(a). Any other terms that are defined in section 7701 and that are not defined in §§ 301.7701-1 to 301.7701-15, inclusive, shall, when used in this chapter, have the meanings assigned to them in section 7701.

(Secs. 1441(c)(4) (80 Stat. 1553; 26 U.S.C. 1441(c)(4)), 3401(a)(6) (80 Stat. 1554; 26 U.S.C. 3401(a)(6)), and 7805 (68A Stat. 917; 26 U.S.C. 7805), Internal Revenue Code of 1954)

[T.D. 7977, 49 FR 36836, Sept. 20, 1984]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Policy Board Advisory Committee.

# ACTION:

Notice.

      ( print page 39307)    

# SUMMARY:

The Defense Policy Board Advisory Committee will meet in closed session on September 9, 2009 from 8 a.m. until 6 p.m. and on September 10, 2009 from 8 a.m. until 10:30 a.m. at the Pentagon.

The purpose of the meeting is to provide the Secretary of Defense, Deputy Secretary of Defense and Under Secretary of Defense for Policy with independent, informed advice on major matters of defense policy. The Board will hold classified discussions on national security matters.

In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended [5 U.S.C. App II (1982)], it has been determined that this meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552B (c)(1)(1982), and that accordingly this meeting will be closed to the public.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ann Hansen, (703) 571-9232.

Dated: July 30, 2009.

Patricia L. Toppings,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. E9-18826 Filed 8-5-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P