alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsNeutron Angular Scatter Effects in 3DHZETRN: Quasi-ElasticThe current 3DHZETRN code has a detailed three dimensional (3D) treatment of neutron transport based on a forward/isotropic assumption and has been compared to Monte Carlo (MC) simulation codes in various geometries. In most cases, it has been found that 3DHZETRN agrees with the MC codes to the extent they agree with each other. However, a recent study of neutron leakage from finite geometries revealed that further improvements to the 3DHZETRN formalism are needed. In the present report, angular scattering corrections to the neutron fluence are provided in an attempt to improve fluence estimates from a uniform sphere. It is found that further developments in the nuclear production models are required to fully evaluate the impact of transport model updates. A model for the quasi-elastic neutron production spectra is therefore developed and implemented into 3DHZETRN.Document ID20170004503Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsWilson, John W.*(Old Dominion Univ. Norfolk, VA, United States)*Werneth, Charles M.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Slaba, Tony C.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Badavi, Francis F.*(Old Dominion Univ. Norfolk, VA, United States)*Reddell, Brandon D.*(NASA Johnson Space Center Houston, TX, United States)*Bahadori, Amir A.*(Kansas State Univ. Manhattan, KS, United States)*Date AcquiredMay 9, 2017Publication DateMarch 1, 2017Subject CategorySpace RadiationReport/Patent NumberNF1676L-26529L-20794NASA/TP-2017-219597Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 651549.02.07.10Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20170004503.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 1.951-2 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1996
<CASH>                                             517
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,594
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,279
<INVENTORY>                                     22,011
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,784
<PP&E>                                          71,718
<DEPRECIATION>                                  31,271
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  88,195
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,259
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,313
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,194
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    88,195
<SALES>                                         29,285
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,285
<CGS>                                           24,698
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,424
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (160)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   104
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 525
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    392
<INCOME-TAX>                                       169
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                223
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       223
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04
        

</TABLE>
Jun 191210:43p Don Vasquez 

Document Management Fac;jljty .. ~ ·~ 

US Dept of Transportation · · ~ · ~ 

1200 New Jersey Ave SE 

Room W12-140 

Washington, DC 20590 

Document 2012-0350 

Dear Committee members, 

940 498 1822 p.1 

511 Oakcrest St 

Lake Dallas, TX 75065-2315 

June 20, 2012 

I am a FAA certified Private pilot with 1,375 hours and I typically fly 20- 30 

hours each year. 

This letter is in support of the FAA proposal to exempt recreational pilots from 

being required to obtain 3rd class physical exams from FAA AMEs as now 

required under FAR 61.23. 

This proposal would allow the exemption for private and recreational pilots 

who are limited to flying a 180 HP aircraft or less, 4 seats or less, and to only 

fly dayllght VFR. 

These limitations restrict the flying to fun only purposes. Night flying, IFR 

flights, and other business-related flights would still require a Class Ill exam. 

Research has shown that LSA pilots (exempt from an FAA. medical) are not at 

risk for medica! emergencies while flying. Flying for fun, using the pilot's own 

determination if he/she is physically fit has shown it does not present any 

adverse medica! risk for pilots. 

Also this will reduce the cost of flying for about 100,000 pilots by eliminating 

the expensive FAA required physical exam. 

Therefore, I endorse this recommendation and hope the FAA will approve this 

proposal. 

Sincerely, 

~ Donald J Vasq'7{z 

511 Oakcrest ~ Lake Dallas, TX 75065-2315 

940-498-1822 

vasq uezd@centurytel. net
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a), AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.



I, Kenneth M. Borow, M.D., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Covalent Group,
Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based upon such evaluation; and



c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.



|                   |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 14, 2004 |  | /s/ Kenneth M. Borow, M.D.           
|                   |  | Kenneth M. Borow, M.D.               
|                   |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Ambrocio HUBER-CARLON; et al., Petitioners, v. John ASHCROFT,* Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 00-70395.

INS Nos. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ] [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 10, 2002 **.

Decided June 18, 2002.

Before O’SCANNLAIN, BERZON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 John Ashcroft is substituted for Janet Reno pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

**

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

Ambrocio Huber-Carlon and Maricela Hernandez-Nolasco, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their appeal of the Immigration Judge’s order denying their application for cancellation of removal because they failed to demonstrate “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship” to a qualifying relative under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l)(D).

*917We lack jurisdiction to review this petition. *See 8*U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); *Montero-Martinez v. Ashcroft,*277 F.3d 1137, 1144 (9th Cir.2002).

We deny as moot petitioners’ motion for stay of removal pending decision of this Court.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 153 (Tuesday, August 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 40207]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19091]



[[Page 40207]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Amended Notice of 
Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Institute of General Medical Sciences Special Emphasis Panel, August 
17, 2009, 8 a.m. to August 17, 2009, 5 p.m., National Institutes of 
Health, Natcher Building, Room 3AN12, 45 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 
20892 which was published in the Federal Register on July 24, 2009, 74 
FR 36728.
    The meeting has been changed from August 17, 2009 to August 20, 
2009. The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: August 4, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-19091 Filed 8-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
          the quarter ended September 29, 1999 Form 10Q Balance Sheets and
          Statements of Operations and is qualified in its entirety by reference
          to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                          0000856135
<NAME>                         American Tax Credit Properties III L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                     US Dollars

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              MAR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                 MAR-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                   SEP-29-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                       1.00
<CASH>                                 772
<SECURITIES>                         2,561
<RECEIVABLES>                           17
<ALLOWANCES>                             0
<INVENTORY>                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         0
<PP&E>                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       8,494
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                2,294
<BONDS>                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<COMMON>                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         8,494
<SALES>                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       119
<CGS>                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       261
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (1,015)
<INCOME-TAX>                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 (1,015)
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                        (1,015)
<EPS-BASIC>                       (28.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0


</TABLE>
(logo)****CURCIO

+COHEN

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

Managing Member

Park Bridge Lender ServicesLLC

New York, NY

 

 

We have examinedmanagement’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management’sReport on Assessment of 2016 Compliance by Park Bridge Lender Services LLC withRegulation AB Servicing Criteria (“Management’s Report”),that Park Bridge Lender Services LLC (the “Company”) complied withthe servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securities andExchange Commission’s Regulation AB as of and for the year ended December31, 2016, excluding those criteria noted as not applicable (N/A) within ExhibitB to Management’s Report. The transactions covered by this report areonly those transactions processed by the Company in its capacity as trustadvisor or operating advisor for the asset backed securities transactions (the“Platform”) identified in Management’s Report. ReferenceExhibit A to Management’s Report for the transactions covered by thisexamination. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance withthe applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinionon management’s assertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted inaccordance with attestation standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicableservicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considerednecessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of a selectedsample of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whetherthe Company performed those selected activities in compliance with theapplicable servicing criteria during the specified period. Our procedures werelimited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by theCompany during the period covered by this report. Our examination was notdesigned to detect material noncompliance arising from errors that may haveoccurred prior to or subsequent to our tests, that may have affected theCompany’s servicing activities during the period covered by this report.We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’scompliance with the applicable servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementionedapplicable servicing criteria identified in Exhibit B to Management’sReport with respect to the transactions identified in Exhibit A toManagement’s Report as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, forthe Platform, is fairly stated in all material aspects.

 

 

/s/ Curcio & Cohen,CPA’s, P.C.

 

 

New York, NY

February 2, 2017

 

 

CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTSPC 7 PENN PLAZA, SUITE 1500 NEW YORK NY 10001

TEL: 212 557-9800  FAX:212 557 9819   WEBSITE: WWW.CWCCPAFIRM.COM
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 17 Referral Instructions Senate (RIS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 17

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 27 (legislative day, January 10), 1995

                                Received

             February 1 (legislative day, January 30), 1995

   Referred jointly pursuant to the order of August 4, 1977, to the 
 Committees on the Budget and Governmental Affairs, with instructions 
that if one committee reports, the other committee have thirty days to 
                        report or be discharged

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Relating to the treatment of Social Security under any constitutional 
                 amendment requiring a balanced budget.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, for the purposes of any constitutional amendment requiring a 
balanced budget, the appropriate committees of the House and the Senate 
shall report to their respective Houses implementing legislation to 
achieve a balanced budget without increasing the receipts or reducing 
the disbursements of the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust 
Fund and the Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund to achieve that 
goal.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 25, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
AMENDMENT TO 1996 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR STOCK OPTION PLAN



 Exhibit 10.4 
 TERADYNE, INC. 
 Amendment 
 To 
 1996 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan 
 This Amendment to the 1996 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”), of Teradyne, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (the
“Company”), is adopted by resolution of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) pursuant to a meeting of the Board dated as of January 22-23, 2007 and effective as of January 23, 2007 (the “Effective
Date”). Paragraph 5. Option Price of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following as of the Effective Date: 
 “5. Option Price. The purchase price of the stock covered by an option granted pursuant to this Plan shall be 100% of the fair market value of such shares on the day the option is granted. The option price will be subject
to adjustment in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 10 of this Plan. For purposes of this Plan, if, at the time an option is granted under the Plan, the Company’s Common Stock is publicly traded, “fair market value” shall be
determined as of the last business day for which the prices or quotes discussed in this sentence are available prior to the date such option is granted and shall mean (i) the closing price (on that date) of the Common Stock on the principal
national securities exchange on which the Common Stock is traded, if the Common Stock is then traded on a national securities exchange; or (ii) the closing bid price (or average of bid prices) last quoted (on that date) by an established
quotation service for over-the-counter securities, if the Common Stock is not traded on a national securities exchange.”
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 153 (Tuesday, August 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 40180]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19129]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL08-47-004]


PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.; Notice of Filing

August 4, 2009.
    Take notice that on July 31, 2009, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. 
filed revised sheets to Schedule 1 of its Amended and Restated 
Operating Agreement, the parallel provisions of Attachment K--Appendix 
of the PJM Open Access Transmission Tariff, and Schedule 2 of the 
Operating Agreement in compliance with the Commission's February 19, 
2009 Initial Order on Market Power Mitigation Provisions and 
Establishing Procedures, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., 126 FERC 61,145 
(2009).
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov/. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov/, using 
the ``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9cdad9cedfd3f2f0f5f2f9cfe9ececf3eee8dcfaf9eeffb2fbf3ea"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6f292a3d2c20010306010a3c1a1f1f001d1b2f090a1d0c41080019">[email protected]</span></a> or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, 
call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on August 21, 2009.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-19129 Filed 8-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JAIME GONZALEZ, §

No. 08-15-00187-CR

Appellant, §

Appeal from the

v. §

34th Judicial District Court

§

THE STATE OF TEXAS, of El Paso County, Texas

§

Appellee. (TC# 20110D03634)

§

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be 

dismissed for want of jurisdiction, in accordance with the opinion of this Court. We therefore 

dismiss the appeal. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2015.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Hughes, JJ.