alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         10,866
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,367,527
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               734,872
<PP&E>                                         1,070,439
<DEPRECIATION>                                 755,490
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,133,579
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,971,490
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       239
<OTHER-SE>                                     (490,765)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,133,579
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               573,285
<CGS>                                          341,559
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,874,449
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,297,670
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,939,035)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,939,035)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,939,035)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (1.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (1.25)
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 147 (Monday, August 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 38428]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18448]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than August 28, 2009.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Ivan Hurwitz, Bank 
Applications Officer) 33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001:
    1. Morgan Stanley, New York, New York; to acquire up to 9.9 percent 
of the voting shares of Community Bankers Trust Corporation, Glen 
Allen, Virginia, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Bank 
of Essex, Essex, Virginia.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 29, 2009.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-18448 Filed 7-31-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
----

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 23 November 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di pace di Monselice (Italy)) — Lidl Italia Srl v Comune di Arcole (VR)

(Case C-315/05) (1)

(Directive 2000/13/EC - Labelling of foodstuffs to be delivered as such to the ultimate consumer - Scope of the obligations under Articles 2, 3 and 12 - Compulsory statement of the alcoholic strength by volume for certain alcoholic beverages - Alcoholic beverage produced in a Member State other than that in which the distributor is established - ‘Amaro alle erbe’ - Actual alcoholic strength by volume lower than that appearing on the label - Overstepping of the tolerance - Administrative fine - Liability of the distributor)

(2006/C 331/23)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Giudice di pace di Monselice (Italy)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Lidl Italia Srl

Defendant: Comune di Arcole (VR)

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Giudice di Pace di Monselice — Interpretation of Directive 2000/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 March 2000 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the labelling, presentation and advertising of foodstuffs (OJ 2000 L 109, p. 29) — Scope of the obligations under Articles 2, 3 and 12 of the directive — Alcoholic beverage produced and packaged in another Member State having an alcohol content lower than that stated on the label — ‘Amaro alle erbe’

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 2, 3 and 12 of Directive 2000/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 March 2000 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the labelling, presentation and advertising of foodstuffs are to be interpreted as not precluding legislation of a Member State, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which makes it possible for an operator, established in that Member State, which distributes a pre-packaged alcoholic beverage to be delivered as such within the meaning of Article 1 of that directive, produced by an operator established in another Member State, to be held liable for an infringement of that provision, established by a public authority, resulting from the producer's inaccurate statement on the product label of the alcoholic strength by volume of the product and, consequently, to be penalised by an administrative fine, even where, as the mere distributor, it simply markets the product as delivered to it by the producer.

----

(1)OJ C 281, 12.11.2005.

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.7606-1 Entry of premises for examination of taxable objects.

Any officer or employee of the Internal Revenue Service may, in the performance of his duty, enter in the daytime any building or place where any articles or objects subject to tax are made, produced, or kept, so far as it may be necessary for the purpose of examining said articles or objects and also enter at night any such building or place, while open, for a similar purpose.

[T.D. 7297, 38 FR 34804, Dec. 19, 1973]
#### In the Matter of Domingo Marmolejo, Appellant, v Roxanne Calabrese, Respondent.

[805 NYS2d 752]

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Paul G. Buchanan, J), entered August 19, 2004 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order dismissed the petition for visitation.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner contends that Family Court erred in dismissing his petition seeking visitation with his daughter without conducting a hearing to determine whether visitation is in his daughter’s best interests. We reject that contention. Petitioner was incarcerated shortly before his daughter’s birth in 1993 and has never seen his daughter. In addition, he admit*1123ted in an affidavit that he will be deported upon his release from prison. An evidentiary hearing was not required herein because “it is clear from the record that the court ‘possessed sufficient information to render an informed determination that was consistent with the child’s best interests’ ” *(Matter of Bogdan v Bogdan,*291 AD2d 909, 909 [2002], quoting *Matter of Vangas v Ladas,*259 AD2d 755, 755 [1999]; *see Matter of Oliver S. v Chemung County Dept. of Social Servs.,*162 AD2d 820, 821-822 [1990]), particularly in view of the lengthy period of petitioner’s incarceration *(see Matter of Gutkaiss v Leahy,*285 AD2d 752 [2001]; *Matter of Bougor v Murray,*283 AD2d 695 [2001]), the “virtually nonexistent previous relationship” of petitioner with his daughter *(Matter of Ellett v Ellett,*265 AD2d 747, 748 [1999]; *see Gutkaiss,*285 AD2d at 753), and the fact that petitioner will be deported upon his release from prison. Present—Kehoe, J.P., Martoche, Pine, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Craftmade International, Inc. (the Company), does
hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that: The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004
(the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q. Date: May 17, 2004
    
    /s/ James R. RidingsJames R. RidingsChairman of the Board,President andChief Executive Officer
 The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form
10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part
of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
general incorporation language in such filing.
IA

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 160

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to provide

that Federal judges be reconfirmed by the Senate every six years.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 16, 1996

Mr. HAYES introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States to provide that Federal judges be reconfirmed

by the Senate every six years.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission

9 for ratification:
2

HJ 160 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE—

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. Except as provided in section 2, no per3 son may serve more than six years as a judge of a court

4 created by Act of Congress, except with the consent of the

5 Senate, given within the first year at the beginning of each

6 successive six-year period after the judge first takes office.

7 ‘‘Sec. 2. For purposes of this article, any person who

8 first took office as a judge of a court created by Act of

9 Congress before the adoption of this article shall be di10 vided into three classes. The first class, those judges who

11 have twelve or more years of service, shall be subject to

12 reconfirmation by the Senate within the first year follow13 ing the adoption of this article. The second class, any per14 son who first took office as a judge no fewer than five

15 nor more than twelve years before the adoption of this ar16 ticle, shall be subject to reconfirmation by the Senate with17 in the second year following the adoption of this article.

18 The third class, all other judges, shall be reconfirmed by

19 the Senate within the first 365 days at the beginning of

20 each successive six-year period after the judge first took

21 office.

Æ
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.6503(c)-1 Suspension of running of period of limitation; location of property outside the United States or removal of property from the United States; taxpayer outside of United States. ( a ) *Property located outside, or removed from, the United States prior to November 3, 1966.* The running of the period of limitations on collection after assessment prescribed in section 6502 is suspended for the period of time, prior to November 3, 1966, that collection is hindered or delayed because property of the taxpayer is situated or held outside the United States or is removed from the United States. The total suspension of time under this provision shall not in the aggregate exceed 6 years. In any case in which the district director determines that collection is so hindered or delayed, he shall make and retain in the files of his office a written report which shall identify the taxpayer and the tax liability, shall show what steps were taken to collect the tax liability, shall state the grounds for his determination that property of the taxpayer is situated or held outside, or is removed from, the United States, and shall show the date on which it was first determined that collection was so hindered or delayed. The term “property” includes all property or rights to property, real or personal, tangible or intangible, belonging to the taxpayer. The suspension of the running of the period of limitations on collection shall be considered to begin on the date so determined by the district director. A copy of the report shall be mailed to the taxpayer at his last known address. For further guidance regarding the definition of last known address, see § 301.6212-2.
( b ) *Taxpayer outside United States after November 2, 1966.* The running of the period of limitations on collection after assessment prescribed in section 6502 (relating to collection after assessment) is suspended for the period after November 2, 1966, during which the taxpayer is absent from the United States if such period is a continuous period of absence from the United States extending for 6 months or more. In a case where the running of the period of limitations has been suspended under the first sentence of this paragraph and at the time of the taxpayer's return to the United States the period of limitations would expire before the expiration of 6 months from the date of his return, the period of limitations shall not expire until after 6 months from the date of the taxpayer's return. The taxpayer will be deemed to be absent from the United States for purposes of this section if he is generally and substantially absent from the United States, even though he makes casual temporary visits during the period.
[T.D. 7121, 36 FR 10782, June 3, 1971, as amended by T.D. 8939, 66 FR 2821, Jan. 12, 2001]
ToddC . Emerson , #817 5

44 4 Sout h Rive r Road St . George , Utah , 8479 0 Telephone : (435 ) 634-353 0 Facsimile : (435 ) 634-350 5 Email : temerson@skywest.co m

- an d- Michae l L . Dworki n #6404 7 46 5 Californi aStreet , Suit e 21 0 San Francisco , Californi a9410 4 Telephone : (415 ) 421-0250 0 Facsimile : (415)421-256 0 Email : la\v@avialex.co m Attorney s fo

r SkyWes t Airlines , Inc . 

### p 2

- 

### S-^ >

UNITE D STATE S O FAMERIC A DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N OFFIC E O FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D.C . I n th e Matte r

of : SkyWes t Airlines , Inc . FA A Case s No . 201INM06001 0 an d0600 : DM S Nos . FAA-2011-0485 an d048 6 . SKYWES T AIRLINES , INC.' S NOTIC E O FUNAVAILABILIT Y

O FCOUNSE L Judge : Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwi n SKYWES T AIRLINES , INC . (hereinafte r referre dto a s "SKYWEST") , b y an dthroug h it s undersigne dcounsel , respectfull y submit s thi s Notic e o f Unavailability o f

Counsel . Althoug h thi s consolidate dmatte r ha s no t ye t bee n set fo r hearing , i

n th e interes t

ofschedulin g ahearin g o n date s upo n whic h SKYWEST' s counse l wil l b e available , i t i s requeste d that th e hearin g no t

b e se t o n any o f

th e followin g dates ; Apri l 24-26 , 2012 ; Ma y 5-11 , 2012 ; Ma y 20-25 , 2012 ; Jul y 14-Aiigust3 , 2012 ; Augus t 25-Septembe r

14,2012 ; Septen^ber25,2012 ; Octobe r 10,2012 ; October24-26 , 2012;an d Novembe r

1-15,2012 . Respectfull y subrfiilte c

X MICHAE L L . DWORKI N

Co-Counse l fo r

ShyWes l Airline s Dated : Februar

y 6 , 201 2

2011NM06001 0 and060011/DM S Nos . FAA-20n-048 5 an d048 6

SkyWest' s Notic e o f

Unavailability o f

Counse l Pag e 2CERTIFICAT E O FSERVIC E

Th e undersigne dhereb y certifie s tha t o n thi s 6t h da y o f February , 2012 , atru e andcorrec t cop y o f th e foregoin g SKYWEST' S NOTIC E O FUNAVAILABILIT Y O FCOUNSE L wa s serve da s follows : Th e Honorabl e RichardC . Goodwi n Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mE12

- 32 0 Washington , D.C . 2059 0

{Federa l Express ] Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenu e S W Washington , DC 2059 1 Attn : Hearin g Docket

Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wright Buildin g - Suit e 2W100 0 fFedera l Express } Jeffrey M . Harper

Federal Aviatio n Administratio n Northwes t

Mountai n Region , ANM- 7 160 1 Lhi dAvenu e S.W . Renton , Washingto n 9805 7 FA X (425 ) 227-100 7

{Facsimil e an dFedera l Express }

2011NM06001 0 an d060011/DM S Nos . FAA-2011-048 5 an d048 6

SkyWest' s Notic e o f

Unavailability o f

Counse l Pag e 3
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 89 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 89

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

   Waiving provisions of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1970 
             requiring adjournment of Congress by July 31.
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 89

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, nothwithstanding the provisions of section 132(a) of the 
Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 198(a)), the House of 
Representatives and the Senate shall not adjourn for a period in excess 
of three days, or adjourn sine die, until both Houses of Congress have 
adopted a concurrent resolution providing either for an adjournment (in 
excess of three days) to a day certain or for adjournment sine die.
            Passed the House of Representatives July 31, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 92 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.92
                                                Agreed to August 4, 1995

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
  the fourth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-five

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Friday, August 
4, 1995, pursuant to a motion made by the Majority Leader, or his 
designee, it stand adjourned until noon on Wednesday, September 6, 
1995, or until noon on the second day after Members are notified to 
reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this resolution, whichever occurs 
first; and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns on any day 
beginning on Saturday, August 5, 1995, through Saturday, August 19, 
1995, pursuant to a motion made by the Majority Leader, or his 
designee, in accordance with this resolution, it stand recessed or 
adjourned until noon on Tuesday, September 5, 1995, or until such time 
on that day as may be specified by the Majority Leader or his designee 
in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second day 
after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, 
in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```