alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
J-S24016-18

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

v.

XAVIER LACOSTA-FRANCO, 

Appellant

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

 PENNSYLVANIA

 No. 1195 MDA 2017

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence, March 2, 2017,

in the Court of Common Pleas of Berks County,

Criminal Division at No(s): CP-06-CR-0002791-2014.

BEFORE: OLSON, J., KUNSELMAN, J., and MUSMANNO, J.

JUDGMENT ORDER BY KUNSELMAN, J.: FILED JUNE 04, 2018

Xavier Lacosta-Franco appeals from his judgment of sentence. 

The trial judge, in his 1925(a) Opinion, points out that, after LacostaFranco filed this appeal, his sentence became illegal when this Court decided

Commonwealth v. Butler, 173 A.3d 1212 (2017). The trial court asks that 

we vacate and remand this matter to it for resentencing. Trial Court Opinion, 

1/18/18, at 9.

Accordingly, it is SO ORDERED.

Judgment of sentence vacated. Case remanded. 

Jurisdiction relinquished.
J-S24016-18

- 2 -

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq.

Prothonotary

Date: 06/04/2018
Jame s Tumer/R6/USEPA/U S

H^i^^'^ii: ' ' 0''/24/200 8 11:2 3 A M 

# mxz Z T o "Gentry , Frederick " <fgentry@littlerock.org > ccShaw n Ghose/R6/USEPA/US@EPA , rebamburg@aol.co m bc c SubjectRE : Monitorin g atRoger s RoadE ) Mr
. Gentry , I a m makin g a mino rchang e t o th e languag e o fne wsubparagrap h 4(f ) t o mak e i tcompor twit h th e exhibit s t o th e instrument
. Tha tis , I a m changin g th e wor d "shown " i n th e secon d lin e t o th e wor d "described" , becaus e Exhibi tC i s a narrative , writte n propert ydescriptio n an d i s no ta visua l one , suc h a s a plat , map , o rphotograph
. Ther e ar e n o othe rchange s t o th e language , i fyo u hav e an yquestions , pleas e telephon e o remai l m e pe rth e informatio n below
. Jame s L
. Turne r Senio rAttorne y Offic e o fRegiona l Counse l (6RC-S ) U.S
. EP ARegio n 6 144 5 Ros s Avenue , Ste
. 120 0 Dallas , Texa s 75202-273 3 E-Mail : Turner.James@epa.go v Ph : (214)665-315 9 Fax:(214)665-646 0



### 905033 1
Order filed June 10, 2014 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-13-01086-CR

DERRICK BROOKS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 178th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1326207

ORDER

On June 4, 2014, this Court issued an order abating the appeal and directing 

the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the reason for the failure to file 

appellant’s brief. On June 5, 2014, appellant filed a motion to withdraw that order,

as well as his brief and a motion to extend time to file the brief.

The motions are granted. Our order of June 4, 2014, is withdrawn and the 

appeal is reinstated. The State’s brief is due thirty days after the date of this order. 

.

PER CURIAM
IA

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 165

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1996, and for

other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 20, 1996

Mr. LIVINGSTON introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Appropriations

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

1996, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Public Law 104–99 is further amended by striking

4 out ‘‘March 22, 1996’’ in sections 106(c), 112, 126(c),

5 202(c), and 214 and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘March 29,

6 1996’’, and that Public Law 104–92 is further amended

7 by striking out ‘‘March 22, 1996’’ in section 106(c) and

8 inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘April 3, 1996’’.

Æ
IA

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 188

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States regarding

the liability of Members of Congress for false statements made in carrying out their official duties.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 2, 1996

Mrs. MYRICK introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States regarding the liability of Members of Congress

for false statements made in carrying out their official

duties.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the follow4 ing article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitu5 tion of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents

6 and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by

7 the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States with-
2

•HJ 188 IH

1 in seven years after the date of its submission for ratifica2 tion:

3 ‘‘ARTICLE—

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. Senators and Representatives may be

5 held liable for false statements or other false communica6 tions made in carrying out their official duties.

7 ‘‘SECTION. 2. The Congress shall have power to en8 force this article by appropriate legislation.’’.

Æ
#### Nathaniel Pringle, Respondent, v Theodore Roussan, Appellant.

[804 NYS2d 265]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (M. Garson, J.), dated September 22, 2004, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In opposition to the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, the plaintiff submitted evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether he sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) *(see Agyeman v Osei-Owusu,*15 AD3d 599 [2005]). Cozier, J.P., Luciano, Fisher and Covello, JJ., concur.
Summary of Director' Compensation



 Exhibit 10.16 
 Summary of Directors’ Compensation 
 In 2006, non-employee directors were paid $15,800 per quarter ($63,200 per
year) and received 200 shares per quarter (beginning in July 2006) of Albemarle common stock in accordance with the 2006 Stock Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors of the Company for service as a director. In addition, non-employee directors
received an additional amount based on their committee service: Audit Committee members received $2,250 per quarter ($9,000 per year) and the Chairman of the Audit Committee received an additional $2,250 per quarter ($9,000 per year); Executive
Compensation Committee members received $1,750 per quarter ($7,000 per year) and the Chairman of the Executive Compensation Committee received an additional $1,125 per quarter ($4,500 per year); and Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility
members received $1,250 per quarter ($5,000 per year) and the Chairman of the Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility Committee received an additional $750 per quarter ($3,000 per year). In addition, we reimbursed each of our non-employee
directors for reasonable travel expenses incurred in connection with attending Board and Board Committee meetings. Employee members of the Board of Directors were not paid separately for service on the Board. 
  

 94
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.6511(e)-1 Special rules applicable to manufactured sugar. ( a ) *Use as livestock feed and for distillation of alcohol.* No payment shall be allowed or made under section 6418 (a) unless within 2 years after the date the right to such payment has accrued a claim therefor is filed by the person entitled thereto. Such right accrues as of the date the manufactured sugar, or article manufactured therefrom, is used for a purpose for which payment is allowable under section 6418(a).
( b ) *Exportation.* No payment shall be allowed or made under section 6418 (b) unless within 2 years after the date the right to such payment has accrued a claim therefor is filed by the person entitled thereto. Such right accrues as of the date the articles are exported.
#### § 25.6091-2 Exceptional cases.

Notwithstanding the provisions of § 25.6091-1 the Commissioner may permit the filing of the gift tax return required by section 6019 in any local Internal Revenue Service office.

[T.D. 6600, 27 FR 4987, May 29, 1962, as amended by T.D. 9156, 69 FR 55745, Sept. 16, 2004]
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

GS Mortgage SecuritiesCorporation II 

200 West Street

New York, New York 10282

 

Re:          Annual Statement of Compliance for GS Mortgage Securities Trust 2016-GS4Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-GS4

 

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of November 1, 2016 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned,a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as CertificateAdministrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of andfor the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of WellsFargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 167 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 167

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
             limit the judicial power of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 21, 1996

    Mr. Talent introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
             limit the judicial power of the United States.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article --

    ``The judicial power of the United States shall not include the 
power to require any of the several States, the District of Columbia, 
or any commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States to 
levy or increase any tax.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 132 Considered and Passed House (CPH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 132

 Affirming that budget negotiations shall be based on the most recent 
 technical and economic assumptions of the Congressional Budget Office 
and shall achieve a balanced budget by fiscal year 2002 based on those 
                              assumptions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

            December 18 (legislative day, December 15), 1995

  Mr. Kasich (for himself, Mr. Condit, and Mr. Hobson) introduced the 
 following joint resolution; which was considered under suspension of 
                          the rules and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Affirming that budget negotiations shall be based on the most recent 
 technical and economic assumptions of the Congressional Budget Office 
and shall achieve a balanced budget by fiscal year 2002 based on those 
                              assumptions.

Whereas on November 20 the President signed legislation (Public Law 104-56) 
        committing Congress and the President to ``enact legislation in the 
        first session of the 104th Congress to achieve a balanced budget not 
        later than fiscal year 2002 as estimated by the Congressional Budget 
        Office'';
Whereas Congress has approved legislation that achieves a balanced budget in 
        fiscal year 2002 as estimated by the Congressional Budget Office;
Whereas congressional Democrats have offered alternative budgets in the House 
        and Senate which also achieve balance in fiscal year 2002 as estimated 
        by the Congressional Budget Office;
Whereas the commitment to enact legislation in the first session of Congress 
        requires action now in negotiations;
Whereas the negotiations have no preconditions on levels of spending or 
        taxation, except that the resulting budget must achieve balance by 
        fiscal year 2002 as estimated by the Congressional Budget Office;
Whereas the Congressional Budget Office has updated its technical and economic 
        assumptions following a thorough consultation with government and 
        private experts; and
Whereas the Congressional Budget Office has begun consultation and review with 
        the Office of Management and Budget: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the current negotiations 
between Congress and the President shall be based on the most recent 
technical and economic assumptions of the Congressional Budget Office, 
and that the Congress is committed to reaching an agreement this year 
with the President on legislation that will achieve a balanced budget 
by fiscal year 2002 as estimated by the Congressional Budget Office.
                                 <all>
```
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 25, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-13-01023-CR

SANTANA MATA OLGUIN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 149th District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 64937

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal from the trial court’s order denying 

his application for post-conviction writ of habeas corpus pursuant to Article 11.07 

of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. An article 11.07 writ of habeas corpus is 

returnable to the Court of Criminal Appeals, and the convicting court’s order may 

not be appealed to this court. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3. Thus, only 

the Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction to review post-conviction habeas 
2

corpus proceedings. Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S. W.2d 241, 243 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1991); Board of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals 

for Eighth Dist., 910 S. W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995) (holding that article 

11.07 provides the exclusive means to challenge a final felony conviction). 

This court lacks jurisdiction to consider an appeal from the order on 

appellant’s post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus. Accordingly, we 

order the appeal dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher, and Brown.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
```

[113th Congress Public Law 80]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 128 STAT. 1006]]

Public Law 113-80
113th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that the Inspector 
  General of the Office of Personnel Management may use amounts in the 
    revolving fund of the Office to fund audits, investigations, and 
     oversight activities, and for other purposes. <<NOTE: Feb. 12, 
                         2014 -  [H.R. 2860]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: OPM IG Act.>> 
SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 5 USC 101 note.>> SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``OPM IG Act''.
SEC. 2. USE OF OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT REVOLVING FUND FOR 
                    AUDITS, INVESTIGATIONS, AND OVERSIGHT 
                    ACTIVITIES.

    Subsection (e) of section 1304 of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by adding before the period at the end 
        of the first sentence the following: ``, and for the cost of 
        audits, investigations, and oversight activities, conducted by 
        the Inspector General of the Office, of the fund and the 
        activities financed by the fund''; and
            (2) in paragraph (5)--
                    (A) by striking ``The Office'' and inserting ``(A) 
                The Office''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(B) <<NOTE: Budget estimate.>>  Such budget shall include 
        an estimate from the Inspector General of the Office of the 
        amount required to pay the expenses to audit, investigate, and 
        provide other oversight activities with respect to the fund and 
        the activities financed by the fund.
            ``(C) The amount requested by the Inspector General under 
        subparagraph (B) shall not exceed .33 percent of the total 
        budgetary authority requested by the Office under subparagraph 
        (A).''.

    Approved February 12, 2014.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2860:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 113-268 (Comm. on Oversight and Government Reform).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014):
            Jan. 14, considered and passed House.
            Jan. 29, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### § 31.3306(b)(6)-1 Payment by an employer of employee tax under section 3101 or employee contributions under a State law.

The term “wages” does not include any payment by an employer (without deduction from the remuneration of, or other reimbursement from, the employee) of either (a) the employee tax imposed by section 3101 or the corresponding section of prior law, or (b) any payment required from an employee under a State unemployment compensation law.
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is herebymade to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1,2016, by and among DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, asDepositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, KEYBANKNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Trustee, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as CertificateAdministrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC,as Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer with respect toCommercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-CD2 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section10.11 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President ofCommercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of theactivities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2017through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance perthe Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best ofmy knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all ofits obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the ReportingPeriod.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February2018.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive VicePresident 

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
§ 31.3401(a)(15)-1 Moving expenses. ( a ) An amount paid to or on behalf of an employee after March 4, 1964, either as an advance or a reimbusement, specifically for moving expenses incurred or expected to be incurred is excepted from wages, and hence is not subject to withholding, if (and to the extent that) at the time of payment it is reasonable to believe that a corresponding deduction is or will be allowable to the employee under section 217. The reasonable belief contemplated by the statute may be based upon any evidence reasonably sufficient to induce such belief, even though such evidence may be insufficient upon closer examination by the district director or the courts finally to establish that a deduction is allowable under section 217. The reasonable belief shall be based upon the application of section 217 and the regulations thereunder in Part 1 of this chapter (Income Tax Regulations). When used in this section, the term “moving expenses” has the same meaning as when used in section 217. See § 1.6041-2(a) in Part 1 of this chapter (Income Tax Regulations), relating to return of information as to payments to employees, and § 31.6051-1(e), relating to the reporting of reimbursements of or payments of certain moving expenses.
( b ) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (a) of this section, or in a numbered paragraph of section 3401(a), amounts paid to or on behalf of an employee for moving expenses constitute wages subject to withholding.
[T.D. 7493, 42 FR 33730, July 1, 1977]
Appeal Dismissed and Opinion Filed September 13, 2012

In The

(!tnurt nf Appiats

3JiftI! Diztrict nf ixa at atIa

No. 05-12-00698-CR

DAVE OSCAR-RAMOGI JUMA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 001-85018-2011

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before ChiefJustice Wright and Justices Bridges and Myers

Appellant, who is representing himself, has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. The Court

GRANTS the motion and ORDERS that the be appeal DISMISSED and this decision be certified

below for observance. See TEx. R. App. P. 42.2(a).

PER CURTAM

Do Not Publish

TEx. R. App. P. 47