alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains financial information from the Consolidated Balance Sheet
at  June  30, 1999 (unaudited) and the Consolidated Statements of Income for the
six  months  ended June 30, 1999 (unaudited) and is qualified in its entirety by
reference  to  such  statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. Dollars

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                         1
<CASH>                                        5930
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         614
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                              2220
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  25233
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             0
<LOANS>                                     141625
<ALLOWANCE>                                   2050
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              181705
<DEPOSITS>                                  153562
<SHORT-TERM>                                  2500
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                           2230
<LONG-TERM>                                   7000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                      3050
<OTHER-SE>                                   13363
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              181705
<INTEREST-LOAN>                               6483
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              714
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                57
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              7254
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                            2825
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            3103
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                         4151
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  210
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              22
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                               3112
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               1612
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    1612
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                  1149
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .32
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                5.32
<LOANS-NON>                                      0
<LOANS-PAST>                                   328
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                              1827
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  148
<RECOVERIES>                                   161
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                             2050
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                          2050
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                              0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                       2050



</TABLE>
#### § 20.2056A-13 Effective dates.

Except as provided in this section, the provisions of §§ 20.2056A-1 through 20.2056A-12 are applicable with respect to estates of decedents dying after August 22, 1995. The rule in the fourth sentence of § 20.2056A-5(c)(2) regarding unitrusts and distributions of income to the surviving spouse in conformance with applicable local law is applicable to trusts for taxable years ending after January 2, 2004.

[T.D. 9102, 69 FR 21, Jan. 2, 2004]
#### Schiller Pantaleon, Respondent, v Marlon Ogilivie, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

[804 NYS2d 766]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Marlon Ogilivie appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (M. Garson, J.), dated September 10, 2004, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was for leave to enter judgment against him upon his default in appearing or answering the complaint, and denied his cross motion to extend the time to answer and to compel the plaintiff to accept his late answer.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and as a matter of discretion, with costs, the branch of the motion which was for leave to enter judgment against the defendant Marlon Ogilivie upon his default in appearing or answering the complaint is denied, the cross motion is granted, and the answer annexed to the cross motion papers is deemed served upon the plaintiff.

Service of the summons and complaint on the defendant Marlon Ogilivie was made in May and June 2003 pursuant to CPLR 308 (2) and (4), respectively. On or about July 25, 2003, the plaintiff moved, inter alia, for leave to enter judgment against Ogilivie upon his default in appearing or answering the complaint. Ogilivie served an unverified answer on August 8, 2003, by regular mail sent to the plaintiffs attorney. Subsequently, Ogilivie cross-moved, inter alia, to compel acceptance of his answer, a copy of which was annexed to the cross motion, on the ground that it was not timely rejected pursuant to CPLR 3022.

The plaintiffs proof did not elaborate on the circumstances surrounding the “receipt” of the answer some 13 days after its mailing. Under these circumstances, the plaintiff did not suf*361flciently establish timely rejection of the unverified answer *(see*CPLR 3022), and therefore, the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying Ogilivie an opportunity to serve an answer before directing entry of a default judgment against him *(see Matter of Kaufman v Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of N.Y,*210 AD2d 226 [1994]; *Rodriguez v L&S Sons,*295 AD2d 492 [2002]; *Specialized Risk Mgt. v Cri-Bet Realty,*307 AD2d 309 [2003]). Therefore, that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was for leave to enter judgment against Ogilivie should have been denied and the defendant’s cross motion, inter alia, to compel the plaintiff to accept Ogilivie’s answer should have been granted. H. Miller, J.P., Crane, Krausman, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.
IA

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 192

To consent to certain amendments enacted by the Legislature of the State

of Hawaii to the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, 1920.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 16, 1996

Mr. ABERCROMBIE introduced the following joint resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Resources

JOINT RESOLUTION

To consent to certain amendments enacted by the Legislature

of the State of Hawaii to the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, 1920.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That, as required by section 4 of the Act entitled ‘‘An

4 Act to provide for the admission of the State of Hawaii

5 into the Union’’, approved March 18, 1959 (73 Stat. 4),

6 the United States consents to the following amendments

7 to the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, 1920, adopted

8 by the State of Hawaii in the manner required for State

9 legislation:
2

•HJ 192 IH

1 (1) Act 339 of the Session Laws of Hawaii,

2 1993.

3 (2) Act 37 of the Session Laws of Hawaii,

4 1994.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This article contains summary information extracted from the nine months ended
December 30, 1999 Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000856135
<NAME>                        Neal Ludeke
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       MAR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                               1.00
<CASH>                                      762,358
<SECURITIES>                              2,486,975
<RECEIVABLES>                                     0
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  0
<PP&E>                                            0
<DEPRECIATION>                                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            8,108,352
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             0
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                5,756,083
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              8,108,352
<SALES>                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            181,685
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          1,575,881
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   0
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                             (1,394,196)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0


</TABLE>
§ 31.3121(i)-1 Computation to nearest dollar of cash remuneration for domestic service. ( a ) An employer may, for purposes of the act, elect to compute to the nearest dollar any payment of cash remuneration for domestic service described in section 3121(a)(7)(B) (see § 31.3121(a)(7)-1) which is more or less than a whole-dollar amount. For the purpose of the computation to the nearest dollar, the payment of a fractional part of a dollar shall be disregarded unless it amounts to one-half dollar or more, in which case it shall be increased to one dollar. For example, any amount actually paid between $4.50 and $5.49, inclusive, may be treated as $5 for purposes of the taxes imposed by the act. If an employer elects this method of computation with respect to any payment of cash remuneration made in a calendar year for domestic service in his private home, he must use the same method in computing each payment of cash remuneration of more or less than a whole-dollar amount made to each of his employees in such calendar year for domestic service in his private home. Moreover, if an employer elects this method of computation with respect to payments of the prescribed character made in any calendar year, the amount of each payment of cash remuneration so computed to the nearest dollar shall, in lieu of the amount actually paid, be deemed to constitute the amount of cash remuneration for purposes of the act. Thus, the amount of cash payments so computed to the nearest dollar shall be used for purposes of determining whether such payments constitute wages; for purposes of applying the employee and employer tax rates to the wage payments; for purposes of any required record keeping; and for purposes of reporting and paying the employee tax and employer tax with respect to such wage payments.
( b ) The provisions of this section apply to any cash payment for domestic service in a private home of the employer made on or after January 1, 1994. For rules applicable to any cash payment for domestic service in a private home of the employer made prior to January 1, 1994, *see* § 31.3121(i)-1 in effect at such time (*see* 26 CFR part 31 contained in the edition of 26 CFR parts 30 to 39, revised as of April 1, 2006).
[T.D. 6516, 25 FR 13032, Dec. 20, 1960, as amended by T.D. 9266, 71 FR 35157, June 19, 2006]
# Continuation of the National Emergency with Respect to the Actions of Certain Persons to Undermine the Sovereignty of Lebanon or its Democratic Processes and Institutions 

On August 1, 2007, by Executive Order 13441, the President declared a national emergency and ordered related measures blocking the property of certain persons undermining the sovereignty of Lebanon or its democratic processes or institutions and certain other persons, pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706). The President determined that the actions of certain persons to undermine Lebanon's legitimate and democratically elected government or democratic institutions; to contribute to the deliberate breakdown in the rule of law in Lebanon, including through politically motivated violence and intimidation; to reassert Syrian control or contribute to Syrian interference in Lebanon, or to infringe upon or undermine Lebanese sovereignty contribute to political and economic instability in that country and the region and constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States.

Despite some positive developments in the past year, including the establishment of diplomatic relations and an exchange of ambassadors between Syria and Lebanon, the actions of certain persons continue to contribute to political and economic instability in Lebanon and continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States. Therefore, the national emergency declared on August 1, 2007, and the measures adopted on that date to deal with that emergency, must continue in effect beyond August 1, 2009. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13441.

                        This notice shall be published in the                         *Federal Register*                        and transmitted to the Congress.                    

[FR Doc. E9-18592

Billing code 3195-W9-P
>: ,,5:

# .~**'?~~** . 

# ". Maryland . , 

# Department of Planning Martin 0 'Malky RichardEberhart HaU Governor Secretary Antho'!J G. BrolV1t Matthelll

### J. POIIIef" U. GOVff1lor Depury Secretary July 2,2010

Ms. Deborah Rabin Regulations Coordinator, Air & Radiation Management Administration Maryland Department ofthe Environment 1800 Washington Boulevard Suite 730 Baltimore, MD 21230 STATE CIJEARINGHOUSE REVIEW PROCESS

State Application Identifier: MD20100fi30-0652 Project Description: Notice ofPublic Hearings: Definition ofFuel Burning Equipment; Distributed Generation Amendments; Large Appliance Coating; Lithographic and Letter Press Printing Project Location: Maryland Clearinghouse Contact: Bob Rosenbush Dear Ms. Rabin: Thank you for submitting your project for intergovernmental review. Participation in the Maryland Intergovernmental Review and Coordination (MIRC) process helps ensure project consistency with plans, programs, and objectives ofState agencies and local governments. Notice ofyour application is being provided to State and local public officials through the 

### Intergovernmental Monitor, which is a weekly Internet publication identifying projects received by the State Clearinghouse for Intergovernmental Assistance. This document may be viewed at http://www.mdp.state.md.us/CLHOUSEImonitorfy04.htm. The project has been assigned a unique State Application Identifier that should be used on all documents and correspondence. All MIRC requirements have been met in accordance with Code ofMaryland Regulations (COMAR 34.02.01.04-.06) and this concludes the review process for the above referenced project. Ifyou need assistance or have questions, contact the State Clearinghouse staffperson noted above at 410-767-4490 or through e-mail atbrosenbush@rndp.state.md.us

. Thank you for your cooperation with the MIRC process. Sincerely,

# '~t.~~ Linda C. Janey, J.D.,

# Assis~;ec~etar? for Clearinghouse and Communications LCJ:BR

cc: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency J 0-0652_NMNEWdoc

301 West Preston Street -Suite 1101 -Balti11lorr, Maryland 21201-2305 Telephone: 410.767.4500
- Fax: 410.767.4480
- ToUFm: 1.877.767.6272

- TIY Users: Maryland**&~** Internet: Planning.MarylandgJII
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

ROBERT L. MARTIN , Appellant,

v.

LAKESIDE AT TAMARAC CONDOMINIUM ASSOC IATION , INC. , Appellee

.

No. 4D 2 1

- 2137

[ April 21, 2022 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; John B. Bowman , Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE19

- 005199

.
Robert L. Martin, Tamarac, pro se

.
Daniel C. Lopez of Frank Perez

- Siam, P.A., Miami , for appellee

.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

C ONNER , C.J., F ORST and Artau

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.7423-1 Repayments to officers or employees.

The Commissioner is authorized to repay to any officer or employee of the United States the full amount of such sums of money as may be recovered against him in any court, for any internal revenue taxes collected by him, with the cost and expense of suit, and all damages and costs recovered against any officer or employee of the United States in any suit brought against him by reason of anything done in the official performance of his duties under the Code.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA - 2014 - 0920 Directorate Identifier: 2014NM192AD

GE 5000ELM - 28 - 075, R1 --- 5/6/14 GE 6000ELM - 28 - 076, R1 --- 5/6/14

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
IV

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 203

Providing for an Adjournment of Both Houses.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 26, 1996

Mr. ARMEY submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

considered and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for an Adjournment of both Houses.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That, in consonance with section 132(a) of

3 the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946, when the

4 House adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, August

5 1, 1996, Friday, August 2, 1996, or Saturday, August 3,

6 1996, pursuant to a motion made by the Majority Leader

7 or his designee, it stand adjourned until noon on Wednes8 day, September 4, 1996, or until noon on the second day

9 after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to sec10 tion 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first;

11 and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close

12 of business on Thursday, August 1, 1996, Friday, August
2

HCON 203 ATH

1 2, 1996, Saturday, August 3, 1996, or Sunday, August

2 4, 1996, pursuant to a motion made by the Majority Lead3 er or his designee in accordance with this resolution, it

4 stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Tuesday, Sep5 tember 3, 1996, or until such time on that day as may

6 be specified by the Majority Leader or his designee in the

7 motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second

8 day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to

9 section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs

10 first.

11 SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority

12 Leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with

13 the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority Lead14 er of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House

15 and Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in their

16 opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

This notice corrects a notice (FR Doc. E9-18448 published on page 38428 of the issue for Monday, August 3, 2009, 2009.

Under the Federal Reserve Bank of New York heading, the entry for Morgan Stanley, New York, New York, is revised to read as follows:

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York**                     (Ivan Hurwitz, Bank Applications Officer) 33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001:                

*1. Morgan Stanley*, New York, New York; to retain 9.2 percent, and to acquire up to 9.9 percent, of the voting shares of Community Bankers Trust Corporation, Glen Allen, Virginia, and thereby indirectly retain and acquire voting shares of Bank of Essex, Essex, Virginia.                

Comments on this application must be received by August 28, 2009.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 3, 2009.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. E9-18824 Filed 8-5-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
IV

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 77

Concerning the Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 15, 1995

Mr. LIPINSKI submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Concerning the Fourth World Conference on Women in

Beijing.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),

3 SECTION 1. FOURTH WORLD CONFERENCE ON WOMEN IN

4 BEIJING.

5 It is the sense of the Congress that—

6 (1) the Fourth World Conference on Women in

7 Beijing, China, should promote an authentic wom8 en’s perspective on issues of equality, peace, and de9 velopment; and

10 (2) if the United States sends a delegation to

11 the Conference, the delegation should—
2

•HCON 77 IH

1 (A) in accordance with the United Nations

2 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, ensure

3 that ‘‘motherhood [is] entitled to special care

4 and assistance.’’;

5 (B) in accordance with the Universal Dec6 laration of Human Rights, uphold the family as

7 ‘‘the natural and fundamental group unit of so8 ciety’’ and therefore ‘‘entitled to protection by

9 society and the state’’;

10 (C) oppose female feticide;

11 (D) in accordance with the commonly used

12 and generally accepted usage of the word, gen13 der refers to woman and man as the two sexes

14 of the human being; and

15 (E) in accordance with the United Nations

16 Declaration of Human Rights uphold ‘‘the free17 dom of conscience and religion [and the] mani18 festation [of] one’s religion or belief in prac19 tice’’ with particular regard to those who pro20 vide health care services.

Æ