alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 147 (Monday, August 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38473-38474]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18327]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Interchangeable Virtual Instruments Foundation, 
Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on June 22, 2009, pursuant to section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Interchangeable Virtual 
Instruments Foundation, Inc. has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, Ascor, Inc., has changed its name to 
Gigatronics, San Ramon, CA.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Interchangeable Virtual Instruments 
Foundation, Inc. intends to file additional written notifications 
disclosing all changes in membership.
    On May 29, 2001, Interchangeable Virtual Instruments Foundation, 
Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the 
Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal 
Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on July 30, 2001 (66 FR 
39336).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on April 10, 
2009. A notice was published in the Federal

[[Page 38474]]

Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on May 21, 2009 (74 FR 
23884).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. E9-18327 Filed 7-31-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 97 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 97

To commend the Tar Heels of the University of North Carolina at Chapel 
  Hill for winning the 1993 National Collegiate Athletic Association 
                     Men's Basketball Championship.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 19, 1993

   Mr. Helms (for himself and Mr. Faircloth) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To commend the Tar Heels of the University of North Carolina at Chapel 
  Hill for winning the 1993 National Collegiate Athletic Association 
                     Men's Basketball Championship.

Whereas the men's basketball team of the University of North Carolina at Chapel 
        Hill has had another outstanding season;
Whereas the men's college basketball program at the University of North Carolina 
        at Chapel Hill has in the history of college basketball won more games 
        than has the program of any other college or university in the Nation;
Whereas North Carolina coach Dean Smith has amassed 774 victories in his career, 
        the second-highest total in NCAA history;
Whereas the 1993 North Carolina Tar Heels compiled a record of 35-4 and won the 
        Atlantic Coast Conference regular season championship;
Whereas the North Carolina Tar Heels reached the NCAA's Final Four for the 
        second time in three years; and
Whereas the North Carolina Tar Heels won the 1993 NCAA men's basketball 
        championship: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate commends the Tar Heels of the University 
of North Carolina at Chapel Hill for having won the 1993 National 
Collegiate Athletic Association Men's Basketball Championship.

                                 <all>
```
exv10w14



 





Exhibit 10.14




Compensation of Directors



Nonemployee Directors: Compensation of Nonemployee Directors, aside from that provided
pursuant to the Company’s incentive plans, is as follows:




     Retainer:


Base: $33,000 per year


Serving as a committee chair: Additional $15,000 per year




     Compensation for Attendance at Meetings:


$1,100 for each Board meeting





$1,100 for each Committee meeting



     Deferred Share Units: The Hydril Company 2000 Incentive Plan provides for an automatic annual
nonqualified stock option award to each non-employee director for 3,000 shares of common stock. In
2006, the non-employee directors waived the automatic grant and, in lieu of the options, each
non-employee director was awarded 2,000 deferred share units. The awards will vest and become
payable in full on June 1, 2009. Upon vesting, the deferred share units are settled in cash at the
then fair market value of the common stock on a one-for-one basis. As the deferred share units
cannot result in the issuance of shares of Hydril common stock, they are not issued in connection
with any Hydril incentive plan. See the form of deferred share unit agreement filed as an exhibit
to the Company’s reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for more information.



     Pension Plan: Richard Seaver is a participant in the Hydril Company Retirement Plan.



Employee Directors: Richard Seaver is regarded as an employee of Hydril and was paid
$175,000 by Hydril in 2006. Directors who are employees of Hydril receive no additional
compensation for serving on the Board of Directors. See the Company’s other disclosures in its
reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and exhibits filed therewith regarding executive
compensation for a description of compensation.


Reimbursement of Expenses: All directors are reimbursed for transportation, lodging, meals
and other out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending meetings of the Board of Directors or
committees thereof, including for their spouse for one meeting each year, and for other expenses
incurred in their capacity as directors.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 9, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-60921

Summary Calendar

CHRISTOPHER MUSYOKI,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

--------------------

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A78 885 665

--------------------

Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Christopher Musyoki petitions this court for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’s (BIA) order affirming the

immigration judge’s (IJ) denial of his request for a continuance. 

Musyoki sought a continuance of his removal proceeding pending an

appeal by his wife of the denial of an I-130 petition filed on

his behalf.

Musyoki argues that he was unfairly surprised by the denial

of the I-130 petition. He contends that his wife did not have an

opportunity to respond to the denial or to lodge an appeal. 
No. 06-60921

-2-

The grant of a motion to continue lies within the sound

discretion of the IJ, who may grant the motion for good cause

shown. Witter v. INS, 113 F.3d 549, 555-56 (5th Cir. 1997); see

8 C.F.R. § 1003.29. An “immigration judge’s decision denying a

motion for a continuance will not be reversed unless the alien

establishes that [the] denial caused him actual prejudice and

harm and materially affected the outcome of his case.” In re

Sibrun, 18 I & N Dec. 354, 356-57 (BIA 1983). To show prejudice,

“the alien must specifically articulate the particular facts

involved or the evidence which he would have presented, and

otherwise fully explain how the denial of his motion

fundamentally changed the result reached.” Id. at 357. 

Given that the I-130 petition filed by his wife had been

denied, the petition was not “prima facie approvable.” In re

Garcia, 16 I & N Dec. 653, 656 (BIA 1978). Musyoki did not show

good cause for the grant of a continuance before the IJ. See

Witter, 113 F.3d at 555-56. On his appeal to the BIA, Musyoki

failed to show that the BIA’s affirmance of the IJ’s denial of a

continuance prejudiced him or that it had a material affect on

the outcome of his case. See In re Sibrun, 18 I & N Dec. at 356-

57. Musyoki has not shown that the BIA abused its discretion in

affirming the IJ’s denial of his motion a continuance. See

Witter, 113 F.3d at 555.

Musyoki also contends that the denial of a continuance

violated his right to due process given that his wife is entitled
No. 06-60921

-3-

to appeal the denial of the I-130 petition. Musyoki has not

specified facts or evidence that would suggest that the I-130

petition filed on his behalf by his spouse was improperly denied

or that the outcome would be different on appeal. Musyoki’s due

process claim fails because he has not made “an initial showing

of substantial prejudice.” Anwar v. INS, 116 F.3d 140, 144 (5th

Cir. 1997). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 16

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the two Houses of Congress assemble

3 in the Hall of the House of Representatives on Tuesday,

4 January 24, 1995, at 9 p.m., for the purpose of receiving

5 such communication as the President of the United States

6 shall be pleased to make to them.

7 Passed the House of Representatives January 23,

8 1995.

Attest:

Clerk.
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 16

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for a joint session of Congress to receive

Union.a message from the President on the state of the
§ 303.1-6 Interest and penalties. ( a ) *Liability for interest and civil penalties.* Under subsection (d) of section 36 of the Trading With the Enemy Act there is no liability for interest or penalty on account of any act or failure of the Attorney General. Such subsection is not applicable to interest or penalties payable in respect of any act or failure during the period prior to the vesting of the property by the Attorney General, or after the return of the property, or during the period during which the property was vested by the Attorney General on account of an act or omission of any person other than the Attorney General.
( b ) *Adjustment.* In case of any assessment or collection, or credit or refund, of interest or a civil penalty contrary to the provisions of section 36 (c) or (d), proper adjustment shall be made.
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.6532-2 Periods of limitation on suits by the United States.

The United States may not recover any erroneous refund by civil action under section 7405 unless such action is begun within 2 years after the making of such refund. However, if any part of the refund was induced by fraud or misrepresentation of a material fact, the action to recover the erroneous refund may be brought at any time within 5 years from the date the refund was made.
June 1, 2015 

Mr. Cody Messer 

180 Clearwater Rd 

Carbondale, CO 81623 

Dear Mr. Messer: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your April 30th, 2015 exemption request on behalf into the public docket 

(No. FAA-2015-1374), but we are unable to process your request any further. The 

information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For 

us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 89

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 1 (legislative day, JULY 10), 1995

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Waiving provisions of the Legislative Reorganization Act of

1970 requiring adjournment of Congress by July 31.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That, nothwithstanding the provisions of sec3 tion 132(a) of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946

4 (2 U.S.C. 198(a)), the House of Representatives and the

5 Senate shall not adjourn for a period in excess of three

6 days, or adjourn sine die, until both Houses of Congress

7 have adopted a concurrent resolution providing either for

8 an adjournment (in excess of three days) to a day certain

9 or for adjournment sine die.

Passed the House of Representatives July 31, 1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.6316-8 Refunds and credits in foreign currency. ( a ) *Refunds.* The refund of any overpayment of tax which has been paid under section 6316 in foreign currency may, in the discretion of the Commissioner, be made in the same foreign currency by which the tax was paid. The amount of any such refund made in foreign currency shall be the amount of the overpayment in U.S. dollars converted, on the date of the refund check, at the rate of exchange then used for his official disbursements by the disbursing officer of the Department of State in the country where the foreign currency was originally deposited.
( b ) *Credits.* Unless otherwise in the best interest of the Internal Revenue Service, no credit of any overpayment of tax which has been paid under section 6316 in foreign currency shall be allowed against any outstanding liability of the person making the overpayment except in respect of that portion or the liability which, in accordance with § 301.6316-1 or § 301.6316-7, would otherwise be permitted to be paid in the same foreign currency.
----

Order of the President of the Court of 9 October 2006 — Commission of European Communities v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-85/06) (1)

(2006/C 326/111)

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

----

(1)OJ C 74, 25.03.2006.

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.6050M-1 Information returns relating to persons receiving contracts from certain Federal executive agencies.

For provisions relating to the requirements of returns of information relating to persons receiving contracts from certain Federal executive agencies, see § 1.6050M-1 of this chapter (Income Tax Regulations).

[T.D. 8275, 54 FR 50372, Dec. 6, 1989]

Information Regarding Wages Paid Employees
(logo)TORCHLIGHT

          LOAN SERVICES

 

 

**ANNUAL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

 

CERTIFICATIONJ.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2015-C33,Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through CertificatesSeries 2015-C33 (the “Trust”)

 

I, Jacob Baron, on behalf of TorchlightLoan Services, LLC, as special servicer (the “Certifying Servicer”),certify to J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp. and itsofficers, directors and affiliates, and with the knowledge and intent that theywill rely upon this certification, that:

 

I (or Servicing Officers under my supervision) have reviewed the Certifying Servicer’s activities forthe fiscal year 2017 (the “Reporting Period”) and the Certifying Servicer’sperformance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement; and

 

To the best of my knowledge,based on such review, the Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respectsduring the Reporting Period. 

 

 

Date:February 28, 2018

 

TORCHLIGHT LOAN SERVICES, LLC, as Special 

Servicer

 

By: /s/ Jacob Baron

Name: Jacob Baron

Title: Authorized Signatory

 

 

475 Fifth Avenue, New York,NY 10017

T 212.883.2800  F 212.883.2560

Einfo@torchlightloanservices.com

www.torchlightinvestors.com
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 191 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 191

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 31, 1996

        Received and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  To recognize and honor the Filipino World War II veterans for their 
 defense of democratic ideals and their important contribution to the 
                        outcome of World War II.

Whereas the Commonwealth of the Philippines was strategically located and thus 
        vital to the defense of the United States during World War II;
Whereas the military forces of the Commonwealth of the Philippines were called 
        into the United States Armed Forces during World War II by Executive 
        order and were put under the command of General Douglas MacArthur;
Whereas the participation of the military forces of the Commonwealth of the 
        Philippines in the battles of Bataan and Corregidor and in other smaller 
        skirmishes delayed and disrupted the initial Japanese effort to conquer 
        the Western Pacific;
Whereas that delay and disruption allowed the United States the vital time to 
        prepare the forces which were needed to drive the Japanese from the 
        Western Pacific and to defeat Japan;
Whereas after the recovery of the Philippine Islands from Japan, the United 
        States was able to use the strategically located Commonwealth of the 
        Philippines as a base from which to launch the final efforts to defeat 
        Japan;
Whereas every American deserves to know the important contribution that the 
        military forces of the Commonwealth of the Philippines made to the 
        outcome of World War II; and
Whereas the Filipino World War II veterans deserve recognition and honor for 
        their important contribution to the outcome of World War II: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress recognizes and honors the Filipino World War II 
veterans for their defense of democratic ideals and their important 
contribution to the outcome of World War II.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 29, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 10.6
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT
 First Amendment Borrower Administrative Agent Lenders
  Credit Agreement
     
 Definitions
 
 Amendment to Credit Agreement Section 1.1
 Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio in lieu
 Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio plus plus minus minus minus minus
 5




---



##### 



Amendment to Credit Agreement Section 6.15 Section 6.15 in lieu
 Dividends and Stock Repurchases provided
 Amendment to Compliance Certificate Exhibit E Exhibit E Exhibit E in lieu
 
 Conditions
 Documents
      6




---



##### 



No Default
 Representations and Warranties
 Article VII
 Article V
 Expenses of Administrative Agent
 
 Ratification
 
 Representations and Warranties
 7




---



##### 



Reference to Credit Agreement
 Severability
 Counterparts
 INTEGRATION
 GOVERNING LAW
 The Remainder of This Page Is Intentionally Left Blank.
 8




---



##### 



BORROWER:
    CRAFTMADE INTERNATIONAL, INC.By:
    /s/ J. Marcus ScrudderName:
    J. MARCUS SCRUDDERTitle: OTHER OBLIGORS:
WOODARDCM, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability companyBy:
    /s/ J. Marcus ScrudderName:Title:DUROCRAFT INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
a Texas corporationBy:
    /s/ Brad Dale HeimannName:Title:PRIME HOME IMPRESSIONS, LLC,
a North Carolina limited liability companyBy:
    /s/ Brad Dale HeimannName:Title:




---



##### 



TRADE SOURCE INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
a Delaware corporationBy:
    /s/ Brad Dale HeimannName:Title:C/D/R INCORPORATED,
a Delaware corporationBy:
    /s/ John P Garniewski, Jr.Name:Title:DESIGN TRENDS, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability companyBy:
    /s/ Brad Dale HeimannName:Title:




---



##### 



ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT:
    THE FROST NATIONAL BANK,
as Administrative AgentBy:
    /s/ Julie GlassName:Title:LENDERS:
    THE FROST NATIONAL BANKBy:
    /s/ Julie GlassName:Title:




---



##### 



WHITNEY NATIONAL BANKBy:
    /s/ Jonathan BeverlyName:Title:




---



##### 



COMMERCE BANK, N.A.By:
    /s/ Joe McCaddonName:Title: