alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Craftmade
International, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that: The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the Form 10-Q) of
the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and
for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q. Date: May 10, 2005
    /s/ James R. RidingsJames R. RidingsChairman of the Board, President
and
Chief Executive Officer The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item
601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being
filed as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made
before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. 34
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 .
  1.
    
    the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the
periods presented in the Form 10-Q.
 Date: November 8, 2005
    
    /s/ James R. RidingsJames R. RidingsChairman of the Board, President andChief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 174 (Thursday, September 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 46616]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18936]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of the Secretary


Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission; 
Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with Section 552b of Title 5, 
United States Code, that a meeting of the John H. Chafee Blackstone 
River Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission will be held on 
Thursday, September 17, 2009.
    The Commission was established pursuant to Public Law 99-647. The 
purpose of the Commission is to assist federal, state and local 
authorities in the development and implementation of an integrated 
resource management plan for those lands and waters within the 
Corridor.
    The meeting will convene on September 17, 2009 at 9 a.m. at the 
Jesse M. Smith Memorial Library located at 100 Tinkham Lane, 
Harrisville, RI for the following reasons:
1. Approval of Minutes.
2. Chairman's Report.
3. Executive Director's Report.
4. Financial Budget.
5. Public Input.
    It is anticipated that about thirty people will be able to attend 
the session in addition to the Commission members.
    Interested persons may make oral or written presentations to the 
Commission or file written statements. Such requests should be made 
prior to the meeting to:
Jan H. Reitsma, Executive Director, John H. Chafee, Blackstone River 
Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission, One Depot Square, 
Woonsocket, RI 02895, Tel.: (401) 762-0250.
    Further information concerning this meeting may be obtained from 
Jan H. Reitsma, Executive Director of the Commission at the 
aforementioned address.

Jan H. Reitsma,
Executive Director, BRVNHCC.
[FR Doc. E9-18936 Filed 9-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-RK-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000856143
<NAME>                        CELLMETRIX, INC.

<S>                           <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                        816,000
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 35,000
<ALLOWANCES>                  (22,000)
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              881,000
<PP&E>                        29,000
<DEPRECIATION>                (12,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                3,559,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         1,610,000
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   5,000
<COMMON>                      1,633,000
<OTHER-SE>                    (89,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  3,559,000
<SALES>                       10,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              10,000
<CGS>                         8,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 8,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              798,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            202,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (998,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (998,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (998,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                 (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (.09)


</TABLE>
(logo)Rialto 

CAPITAL

 

 

**2017 AnnualStatement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)**

 

Pooling andServicing Agreement (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) dated as of July 1,2016 by and among SG Commercial Mortgage Securities, LLC as Depositor, WellsFargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors,LLC as Special Servicer, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC as Operating Advisorand Asset Representations Reviewer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association asCertificate Administrator, and Wilmington Trust, National Association asTrustee relating to the SG Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2016-C5,Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-C5

**(SGCMS 2016-C5)**

 

Theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, asspecial servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:

 

1.       Allservicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under thePooling and Servicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the SpecialServicer.

 

2.       Areview of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer forthe period of January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”) inaccordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under mysupervision.

 

3.       Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and ServicingAgreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there hasbeen a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, eachfailure and the nature and status thereof has been specifically identifiedherein.

 

 

Certifiedby: /s/ Adam Singer

AdamSinger, Managing Director

 

Date:March 1, 2018
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****What you need to know aboutcancer of the esophagus**
 
PDF | Mobi | epub
 
SuDoc:HE 20.3152:ES 5/2013
Item Number:0507-G-02 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000910644
 
December 13, 2017
IA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 121

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States in order

to secure the unalienable right of the people to acknowledge, worship,

and serve their Creator, according to the dictates of conscience.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 15, 1995

Mr. HYDE (for himself, Mr. CANADY of Florida, and Mr. GOODLATTE) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States in order to secure the unalienable right of the

people to acknowledge, worship, and serve their Creator,

according to the dictates of conscience.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the follow4 ing article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitu5 tion of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents

6 and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by

7 the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States with-
2

•HJ 121 IH

1 in seven years after the date of its submission for ratifica2 tion:

3 ‘‘ARTICLE —

4 ‘‘Neither the United States nor any State shall deny

5 benefits to or otherwise discriminate against any private

6 person or group on account of religious expression, belief,

7 or identity; nor shall the prohibition on laws respecting

8 an establishment of religion be construed to require such

9 discrimination.’’.

Æ
#### ARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY COMM’N *v.*Silas R. STOBAUGH et ux

5-4989

445 S. W. 2d 511

Opinion delivered September 29, 1969

[Rehearing denied November 3, 1969]

*Thomas R. Keys, Philip N. Gowen*and *Hubert E. Graves,*for appellant.

*Gordon, Gordon & Eddy,*for appellees.

*232George Rose Smith, Justice.

In this proceeding the highway department is condemning, for Interstate 40, part of the appellees’ improved residential lot in the city of Plumerville. The jury fixed the landowners’ compensation at $8,000. In this court the department contends that there is no substantial evidence to support the verdict.

The taking cuts diagonally across the lot, coming within about a foot of the front corner of the house. Stobaugh valued the property at $18,000 before the taking and at $6,000 after the taking. The highway department does not question the latter figure, which is only a few hundred dollars above the corresponding figure given by the appellant’s expert witnesses.

The department does contend that Stobaugh’s initial valuation of $18,000 does not amount to substantial testimony. Stobaugh testified that he had owned and occupied the lot for about fifty years and that he had spent about $8,000 in enlarging and improving the house some six years before the trial. In view of his long familiarity with the property Stobaugh was competent, by reason of being the landowner, to give his opinion about the value of the property. *Arkansas State Highway Comm’n*v. Russell, 240 Ark. 21, 398 S. W. 2d 201 (1966).

Of course, it is true, as pointed out in that case, that the landowner’s evaluation must be disregarded if he is unable on cross examination to give a reasonable basis for his opinion. In the case at bar, however, counsel for the highway department did not pursue their cross examination far enough to demonstrate that Stobaugh had no reasonable basis for his conclusions. ¡Stobaugh mentioned what may have been a comparable sale, in which a house and lot was sold for $20,000. He also stated on redirect examination that he based his opinion on sales that he knew about in the city of Plumerville. Counsel for the condemnor made no effort to discredit the witness’ testimony by probing further into *233the basis for his beliefs. Hence the prima facie admissibility of the landowner’s opinion was not destroyed on cross examination. His testimony is sufficient to support the verdict.

Affirmed.
§ 1.507-7 Value of assets. ( a ) *In general.* For purposes of section 507(c), the value of the net assets shall be determined at whichever time such value is higher: ( 1 ) The first day on which action is taken by the organization which culminates in its ceasing to be a private foundation, or
( 2 ) The date on which it ceases to be a private foundation.
( b ) *Valuation dates.* ( 1 ) In the case of a termination under section 507(a)(1), the date referred to in paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall be the date on which the terminating foundation gives the notification described in section 507(a)(1).
( 2 ) In the case of a termination under section 507(a)(2), the date referred to in paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall be the date of occurrence of the willful and flagrant act (or failure to act) or the first of the series of willful repeated acts (or failures to act) giving rise to liability for tax under chapter 42 and the imposition of tax under section 507(a)(2).
( c ) *Fair market value.* For purposes of this section, fair market value shall be determined pursuant to the provisions of § 53.4942(a)-2(c)(4) of this chapter.
( d ) *Net assets.* For purposes of section 507 and the regulations thereunder, the term *net assets* shall mean the gross assets of a private foundation reduced by all liabilities of the foundation, including appropriate estimated and contingent liabilities. Thus, a determination of net assets may reflect reductions for any liability or contingent liability for tax imposed upon the private foundation under chapter 42 with respect to acts or failures to act prior to termination, for any liability or contingent liability for failures to correct such acts or failures to act, or for any liability or estimated or contingent liability with respect to expenses associated with winding up the organization. If a private foundation's determination of net assets reflects any reduction for any estimated or contingent liability, such private foundation must establish, to the satisfaction of the Commissioner, the reasonableness of such reduction. If the amount of net assets reflects a reduction for any estimated or contingent liability, at the earlier of the final determination of the contingency or the termination of a reasonable time, any excess of the amount by which the gross assets was reduced over the amount of the liability shall be treated in the same manner as if such excess had been considered part of the net assets.
[T.D. 7233, 37 FR 28161, Dec. 21, 1972]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                              0000854926
<NAME> FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                       1

<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                     APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                       JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             5,635,197
<SECURITIES>                                       112,483
<RECEIVABLES>                                      0
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   1,115,668
<PP&E>                                             143,197,833
<DEPRECIATION>                                     45,637,807
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     106,004,675
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              79,429,483
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                         26,575,192
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       106,004,675
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   3,648,311
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   3,551,428
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 1,172,160
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (1,063,048)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                0
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (1,063,048)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (14.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   sep-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         3,536,382
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  11,976
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,552,836
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,003,426
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          400,000
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,603,426
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,003,426
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               203,581
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               67,812
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                135,769
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   135,769
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        
                    

</TABLE>
IV

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 68

Expressing the sense of the Congress that Federal tax law should be clarified

to allow a reasonable charitable tax deduction for the reasonable and

necessary expenses of Alaska Native subsistence whaling captains.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 17, 1995

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska submitted the following concurrent resolution; which

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that Federal tax law

should be clarified to allow a reasonable charitable tax

deduction for the reasonable and necessary expenses of

Alaska Native subsistence whaling captains.

Whereas there is a need to preserve the traditional lifeways

in certain Alaska Native villages; and

Whereas a prohibitive financial burden has been placed upon

Alaska Native subsistence whaling captains by international obligations ratified by the United States: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that Fed3 eral tax law should be clarified to allow a reasonable tax
2

•HCON 68 IH

1 deduction for the reasonable and necessary expenses of

2 Alaska Native subsistence whaling captains related to

3 their conduct of the centuries-old subsistence whaling

4 hunt, which should be treated for such purposes as a char5 itable contribution for the benefit of their native commu6 nity, donations to which are deductible under section 170

7 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

Æ
Director Compensation



 Exhibit 10.25 
 Director Compensation 
 Our non-management directors receive $200,000 per year for their service as directors. We pay $120,000 of this fee in
the form of restricted stock units, based on the fair market value of our Ordinary Shares at the date of award. These stock units are awarded at the Annual General Meeting and vest at the next Annual General Meeting. We pay the remaining $80,000 of
the annual fee to directors in cash quarterly. Committee chairmen receive committee chair retainers as follows: 
  

	 	•	 	 Audit Committee -$25,000, 


  

	 	•	 	 Compensation Committee-$15,000, and 


  

	 	•	 	 Other committees-$10,000. 


 The Lead Director
receives a retainer of $15,000, which is in addition to any retainer received as a committee chairman. All members of the Audit Committee, other than the chairman, receive a premium of $10,000 per year and all members of the Compensation Committee,
other than the chairman, receive a premium of $5,000 per year. Directors are not paid fees for attending regular Board or committee meetings but, at the discretion of the Chairman of the Board and the Lead Director, we may pay an additional $2,000
fee for each special meeting attended by telephone and $3,000 for each special meeting attended in person. We pay the retainers for committee chairmanships and Lead Director, and premiums for Audit or Compensation Committee service and special Board
meeting fees quarterly in cash. Directors may elect to receive all of their compensation, other than compensation for special meetings, in the form of stock units issued on an annual basis. We will issue Ordinary Shares for stock units six months
after a director’s termination from the Board. Until we issue such Ordinary Shares, the director may not sell or transfer the stock units awarded to them. When we pay dividends on our stock, we will issue stock units to directors equivalent in
value to the dividend payments that they would have received if they held stock rather than stock units. 
 In addition to the above
described compensation, we have a matching contribution program for non-management directors pursuant to which we will match director charitable contributions to registered charities, churches or schools up to a maximum of $10,000 per year, with a
$5,000 maximum per organization.