alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 888
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 888 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 888.3370 Hip joint (hemi-hip) acetabular metal cemented prosthesis. ( a ) *Identification.* A hip joint (hemi-hip) acetabular metal cemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a portion of the hip joint. This generic type of device includes prostheses that have an acetabular component made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum. This generic type of device is limited to those prostheses intended for use with bone cement (§ 888.3027).
( b ) *Classification.* Class III.
( c ) *Date PMA or notice of completion of a PDP is required.* A PMA or a notice of completion of a PDP is required to be filed with the Food and Drug Administration on or before December 26, 1996 for any hip joint (hemi-hip) acetabular metal cemented prosthesis that was in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976, or that has, on or before December 26, 1996 been found to be substantially equivalent to a hip joint (hemi-hip) acetabular metal cemented prosthesis that was in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976. Any other hip joint metal (hemi-hip) acetabular metal cemented prosthesis shall have an approved PMA or a declared completed PDP in effect before being placed in commercial distribution.
[52 FR 33702, Sept. 4, 1987, as amended at 61 FR 50710, Sept. 27, 1996]
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.6032-1 Returns of banks with respect to common trust funds.

For provisions relating to requirement of returns of banks with respect to common trust funds, see § 1.6032-1 of this chapter (Income Tax Regulations).
8.00

9.00

10.00

11.00

12.00

13.00

14.00

Q1 1990

Q3 1990

Q1 1991

Q3 1991

Q1 1992

Q3 1992

Q1 1993

Q3 1993

Q1 1994

Q3 1994

Q1 1995

Q3 1995

Q1 1996

Q3 1996

Q1 1997

Q3 1997

Q1 1998

Q3 1998

Q1 1999

Q3 1999

Q1 2000

Q3 2000

Q1 2001

Q3 2001

Q1 2002

Q3 2002

Q1 2003

Q3 2003

Q1 2004

Q3 2004

Q1 2005

Q3 2005

Q1 2006

Q3 2006

Q1 2007

Q3 2007

Q1 2008

Q3 2008

Q1 2009

Q3 2009

Q1 2010

Q3 2010

Q1 2011

Average Awarded ROE

Avg. Awarded ROE

Source: SNL Financial / Regulatory Research Assoc. and EEI Rate Department / U.S. Federal 

Reserve 
Credit Actions - 2010

 51 downgrades

 29 upgrades

 Key factors:

 Downgrades - recession-induced reductions in sales, 

cashflow, interest coverages

 Upgrades – conservative financial management and 

constructive regulatory outcomes
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.6336-1 Sale of perishable goods. ( a ) *Appraisal of certain seized property.* If the district director determines that any property seized by levy is liable to perish or become greatly reduced in price or value by keeping, or that such property cannot be kept without great expense, he shall appraise the value of such property and return it to the owner if the owner complies with the conditions prescribed in paragraph (b) of this section or, if the owner does not comply with such conditions, dispose of the property in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section.
( b ) *Return to owner.* If the owner of the property can be readily found, the district director shall give him written notice of his determination of the appraised value of the property. However, if the district director determines that the circumstances require immediate action, he may give the owner an oral notice of his determination of the appraised value of the property, which notice shall be confirmed in writing prior to sale. The property shall be returned to the owner if, within the time specified in the notice, the owner— ( 1 ) Pays to the district director an amount equal to the appraised value, or
( 2 ) Gives an acceptable bond as prescribed by section 7101 and § 301.7101-1. Such bond shall be in an amount not less than the appraised value of the property and shall be conditioned upon the payment of such amount at such time as the district director determines to be appropriate in the circumstances.
( c ) *Immediate sale.* If the owner does not pay the amount of the appraised value of the seized property within the time specified in the notice, or furnish bond as provided in paragraph (b) of this section within such time, the district director shall as soon as practicable make public sale of the property in accordance with the following terms and conditions— ( 1 ) *Notice of sale.* If the owner can readily be found, a notice shall be given to him. A notice of sale also shall be posted in two public places in the county in which the property is to be sold. The notice shall specify the time and place of sale, the property to be sold, and the manner and conditions of sale. The district director may give such other notice and in such other manner as he deems advisable under the circumstances.
( 2 ) *Sale.* The property shall be sold at public auction to the highest bidder.
( 3 ) *Terms.* The purchase price shall be paid in full upon acceptance of the highest bid. The payment shall be made in cash, or by a certified, cashier's or treasurer's check drawn on any bank or trust company incorporated under the laws of the United States or under the laws of any State, Territory, or possession of the United States, or by a U.S. postal, bank, express, or telegraph money order.
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.6229(e)-1 Information with respect to unidentified partner. ( a ) *In general.* A partner who is not properly identified on the partnership return (including an indirect partner) remains an unidentified partner for purposes of section 6229(e) until identifying information is furnished as provided in § 301.6223(c)-1.
( b ) *Effective date.* This section is applicable to partnership taxable years beginning on or after October 4, 2001. For years beginning prior to October 4, 2001, see § 301.6229(e)-1T contained in 26 CFR part 1, revised April 1, 2001.
[T.D. 8965, 66 FR 50555, Oct. 4, 2001]
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 152 / Monday, August 10, 2009 / Notices 39937 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal Nos. 09–26] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601– 

3740. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittals 09–26 

with attached transmittal and policy 

justification. 

Dated: July 17, 2009. 

Patricia L. Toppings, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, 

Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 


rmajette on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICESEN10AU09.002</GPH>
39938 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 152 / Monday, August 10, 2009 / Notices 

[FR Doc. E9–18958 Filed 8–7–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal Nos. 09–36] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601– 

3740. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittals 09–36 

with attached transmittal, policy 

justification, and Sensitivity of 

Technology. 

Dated: July 28, 2009. 

Patricia L. Toppings, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, 

Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 


rmajette on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICESEN10AU09.003</GPH>
427 A.2d 1210

#### Commonwealth v. Vasquez, Appellant.

Submitted September 13, 1979.

Thomas G. Klingensmith, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant;

Ronald L. Buckwalter, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before SPAETH, HESTER and CAVANAUGH, JJ.

The judgment of sentence of the lower court is hereby affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       3,078,635
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  906,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (65,421)
<INVENTORY>                                    781,464
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,937,342
<PP&E>                                       6,139,336
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,589,336)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,402,094
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          480,152
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    85,084,167
<OTHER-SE>                                (73,162,225)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,402,094
<SALES>                                      2,339,546
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,150,728
<CGS>                                          629,568
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,684,388
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,060,833)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,060,833)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)


</TABLE>
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2007-28229 Directorate ID: 2006-SW-23-AD

Helicopter Model: Eurocopter France Model EC 130 B4 Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 73 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to detect debonding between the twist grip drive 

tubes and the control pinions on the pilot and co-pilot collective levers to prevent loss of cockpit 

throttle control of the engine, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $8,651 for a co-pilot twist grip assembly

$12,542 for a pilot twist grip assembly

$5 for a clamp$2 for a bolt

$1 for a nut

Labor per Helicopter*

(0.25 work-hour x $80/workhour for the debonding 

inspection)

(2 work-hour x $80/workhour for the collective 

replacement)

$20

$160

Other (Explain) *average labor rate of $80 per work-hour used at the

time of the AD publication

Total Cost per Helicopter $20 for the debonding inspection

$160 for the collective replacement (labor)

$8,651 for a co-pilot twist grip assembly (part)

$12,542 for a pilot twist grip assembly (part)

$5 for a clamp$2 for a bolt (part)

$1 for a nut (part)

Total US Fleet Cost $1,460 for the debonding inspection

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Ed Cuevas
es
Re)
oy
& DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOPHYSICAL INVESTIGATIONS Oa
",

wor
’» UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MAP GP 160 ee

74°

15°
aici"

EXPLANATION

Magnetic contours and flight
traverse

Contours dashed where data
are incomplete; contours
show total intensity relative
to an arbitrary datum.

CO

Magnetic contour enclosing
area of lower magnetic
intensity

ca
x
Measured maximum or minimum
intensity within closed high
or closed low

NOTE

Aeromagnetic data are obtained and compiled
along a continuous line, whereas ground mag-

ground magnetic
care should be
:

Mp

i ((M

WMS
Nw L
NA
Noes
\ Wel
nel Z
ZIM / \
gS MIM

Base from U. S. Geological Survey

Aeromagnetic survey flown at ,
topographic quadrangle map

- ‘
ia 500 feet above ground 1951 Se,

AEROMAGNETIG MAP OF THE GREENWOOD LAKE QUADRANGLE
PASSAIC COUNTY, NEW JERSEY AND ORANGE COUNTY
NEW YORK

By John R. Henderson, Natalie Tyson, May Wilson and others

Scale 1:31 680

wn
pyvon g\ane
ae |
HLYON 3NYL

1
1 i ° I MILE
SS J
Approximate mean declination 1957 .
Contour interval 50 and 250 gammas
GEOPHYSICAL INVESTIGATIONS
MAP GP 160 1958

For sale by the U.S, Geological Survey, price 50 cents
Summary of compensation arrangements for independent directors of Time Warner



 Exhibit 10.21 
 INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS COMPENSATION 
 Effective January 25, 2007 
  

			
	Annual Retainer	  	$55,000 (payable $13,750 quarterly)
		
	Annual fee Audit Committee Chair	  	$20,000
		
	Annual fee Compensation Committee Chair	  	$15,000
		
	Nominating and Governance Chair	  	$8,500
		
	Stock Options	  	3,000 options granted each quarter on the last trading day of each calendar quarter as compensation for the ensuing quarter, immediate vesting.
		
		  	50,000 granted at election, with strike price equal to the NASDAQ closing price on the effective date of Board service, vesting over 3 years (first 1/3 vests at first anniversary of grant and
the balance will vest annually thereafter in equal installments on the second and third anniversaries of the grant date).
		
		  	All options will be exercisable for a period of one year from the effective date of termination of board service, unless the termination was for cause,
		
	Restricted Stock	  	2,500 shares of Restricted Stock granted to each sitting independent director under the Company’s amended 2000 Employee Stock at the first regularly scheduled meeting of the Board of
Directors in each calendar year, each grant to vest upon the departure of the independent director from the Board: provided that, with respect to each grant, such director shall have served a term of one year or greater from the effective date of
the grant(s). If the departure date is less than one year from the date of grant(s), the restricted stock will be forfeited. Any director who joins the board after the first regularly scheduled meeting will receive a pro-rated grant on the effective
date of his or her board service.
		
	Expense Reimbursement	  	For Board and Committee meetings in accordance with the Board of Directors Travel Policy.
H. Con. Res. 64 Agreed to May 12, 1995

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the fourth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-five

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF RUNNING OF SPECIAL OLYMPICS

TORCH RELAY THROUGH CAPITOL GROUNDS.

On May 19, 1995, or on such other date as the Speaker of

the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of

the Senate may jointly designate, the 1995 Special Olympics Torch

Relay may be run through the Capitol Grounds, as part of the

journey of the Special Olympics torch to the District of Columbia

Special Olympics summer games at Gallaudet University in the

District of Columbia.

SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

The Capitol Police Board shall take such action as may be

necessary to carry out section 1.
H. Con. Res.—642

SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS.

The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions for physical preparations for the event authorized by section 1.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
Exhibit
      No. 32.1






CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      ss. 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Express, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard
      Altomare, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company,
      certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Dated:
                  June 14, 2007
            By:
            /s/ Richard
              AltomareRichard
                AltomareChief
                Executive Officer andChief
                Accounting Officer






This
      certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.
#### § 1.562-3 Distributions by a member of an affiliated group.

A personal holding company which files or is required to file a consolidated return with other members of an affiliated group may be required to file a separate personal holding company schedule by reason of the limitations and exceptions provided in section 542(b) and § 1.542-4. Section 562(d) provides that in such case the dividends paid deduction shall be allowed to the personal holding company, with respect to a distribution made to any member of the affiliated group, if such distribution would constitute a dividend if it were made to a shareholder which is not a member of the affiliated group.
9/3/2015 Request for Information ­ FAA­2015­2515

https://email.dot.gov/owa/9­AWA­AVS­333Exemptions@faa.gov/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAABFvqQJAFf5SI8crGhIsEIyBwD3qfMUO7BCQ74YBi9P12... 1/1

Request for Information ­ FAA­2015­2515

9­AWA­AVS­333Exemptions (FAA)

Sent:Thursday, September 03, 2015 9:22 AM

To: jharvey@just1uav.com; gnorth@just1uav.com

Dear Mr. North:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA­2015­2515).

This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s) (i.e., fixed‐wing, rotorcraft, lighter‐than‐air) for the

proposed UAS operation. The description(s) should include the maximum weight (including payload). This

information can be located in the aircraft manual(s).

Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order

8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove

closed‐set filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested

response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non‐proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want

us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 9/17/15. If we do not

receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267­4264.

Sincerely,

Dan Ngo

FAA Office of Rulemaking
To whom it may concern.

Docket FAA 2015-0480, Petition for Amendment to Exemption No. 11590;

We kindly request for Expedited Handling as we have been approached by

several film directors for upcoming filming.

Simon Feldman Studio, Inc., which received FAA Exemption No. 11590 on May

14th ,2015 authorizing Simon Feldman Studio, Inc (SFS) under section 333 of

the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 to operate its DJI Phantom and

Inspire1 unmanned aircraft system ("UAS" ) for purposes of capturing Aerial

photography/videography for Film/Television. 

In this present petition for amendment to Exemption No. 1159 SFS seeks

revision to condition 2 so that if may fly its UASs on closed set motion picture

and television sets . SFS is a film production company and this is our core

focus, we have been approached by several film directors for upcoming filming

projects and have turned them down.

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material

respects to those presented in the aforementioned petitions. In Grants of

Exemption Nos. 11440 to Wild Rabbit Productions, LLC (see Docket No.

FAA–2015–0168) , 11062 to Astraeus Aerial (see Docket No. FAA-2014-

0352), 11109 to Clayco, Inc. (see Docket No. FAA-2014-0507), 11112 to

VDOS Global, LLC (see Docket No. FAA-2014-0382), and 11213 to Aeryon

Labs, Inc. (see Docket No. FAA-2014-0642), the FAA found that the enhanced

safety achieved using an unmanned aircraft (UA) with the specifications

described by the petitioner and carrying no passengers or crew, rather than a

manned aircraft of significantly greater proportions, carrying crew in addition

to flammable fuel, gives the FAA good cause to find that the UAS operation

enabled by this exemption is in the public interest.

SFS respectfully requests FAA reissue the May 14, 2015 grant of exemption No

11590.

Regards,

Simon Feldman

President

Simon Feldman Studio Inc

375 Farragut Ave, Hastings-on-Hudson NY 10706

Tel. 914-589-2423