alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 109

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States establishing

English as the official language of the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 28, 1995

Mr. DOOLITTLE (for himself, Mr. HANCOCK, Mr. HANSEN, and Mr. SHAYS)

introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States establishing English as the official language of

the United States.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several
2

HJ 109 IH

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission

2 for ratification:

3 ‘‘ARTICLE—

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. The English language shall be the offi5 cial language of the United States. As the official lan6 guage, the English language shall be used for all public

7 acts including every order, resolution, vote or election, and

8 for all records and judicial proceedings of the Government

9 of the United States and the governments of the several

10 States.

11 ‘‘SECTION 2. The Congress and the States shall en12 force this article by appropriate legislation.’’.

Æ
Water Quality Standards Regulatory Revisions Rulemaking

MEMORANDUM TO RECORD SUBJECT: Meeting with State-EPA Roundtable DATE: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 TIME: Noon – 2:00 PM
Participants: EPA – Sara Hisel-McCoy, Shari Barash, Manjali Vlcan, Janita Aguirre, Christina Christensen, Heather Goss, Gary Russo, Rosaura Conde, Ruth Chemerys, David Hair, Glynis Hill, Ellen Weitzler, Wayne Jackson, Cheryl Atkinson, Lisa Perras-Gordon, David Pfeifer, Russell Nelson, Ann Lavaty, Phillip Woods ACWA/States – Melissa McCoy (ACWA), Gerry Szal (Massachusetts), Scott Stoner (New York), Alex Barron (Virginia), Connie Brower (North Carolina), Martha Clark Mettler (Indiana), Jason Childress (Oklahoma), Mike Tate (Kansas), Tom Stiles (Kansas), Sarah Johnson (Colorado), Lindsay Patterson (Wyoming), Nancy Sonafrank (Alaska), Cheryl Niemi (Washington), Susan Braley (Washington) Summary of Meeting:Participants discussed options derived from public comments received. Agenda TOPIC TIME LEAD__________ 1. Workgroup Roll Call 10 min Aguirre 2. Roundtable Input on Options 60 min Roundtable 3. Questions & Answers 15 min Roundtable 4. Reminders for next Roundtable meeting 5 min Aguirre
#### American Mutual Liability Insurance Company et al. *v.*Alfred N. Premo, Insurance Commissioner, et al.

*Frank E. Callahan*and *John D. Fassett,*in support of the motion.

Submitted June 2

decided June 16, 1964

The motion by the plaintiffs seeking an amendment of the order of this court dated November 12, 1963, denying the plaintiffs’ motion for a ruling on the question whether the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County had become moot is denied.
Exhibit 32.2

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, the undersigned officer of Sky Financial Group, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge,
that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Kevin T. Thompson                               
|Kevin T. Thompson                                   
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                                                    
|April 28, 2006                                      

The signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,408,632
<SECURITIES>                                 1,899,440
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,665,155
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,242,015
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          284,130
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,430,511
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,242,015
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                51,098
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               139,987
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (571,900)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (571,900)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (571,900)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (15.20)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (15.20)<F1>
<FN>
<F1>EPS IS NET LOSS PER $1,000 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP UNIT.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
IV

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 33

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding a private visit by President

Lee Teng-hui of the Republic of China on Taiwan to the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 6, 1995

Mr. LANTOS (for himself, Mr. SOLOMON, and Mr. TORRICELLI) submitted the

following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on

International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding a private

visit by President Lee Teng-hui of the Republic of China

on Taiwan to the United States.

Whereas United States diplomatic and economic security interests in East Asia have caused the United States to

maintain a policy of recognizing the People’s Republic of

China while maintaining solidarity with the democratic

aspirations of the people of Taiwan;

Whereas the Republic of China on Taiwan (known as Taiwan) is the United States’ sixth largest trading partner

and an economic powerhouse buying more than twice as

much annually from the United States as do the

1,200,000,000 Chinese of the People’s Republic of China;
2

•HCON 33 IH

Whereas the American people are eager for expanded trade

opportunities with Taiwan, the possessor of the world’s

second largest foreign exchange reserves;

Whereas the United States interests are served by supporting

democracy and human rights abroad;

Whereas Taiwan is a model emerging democracy, with a free

press, free elections, stable democratic institutions, and

human rights protections;

Whereas vigorously contested elections conducted on Taiwan

in December 1994 were extraordinarily free and fair;

Whereas United States interests are best served by policies

that treat Taiwan’s leaders with respect and dignity;

Whereas President Lee Teng-hui of Taiwan, a Ph.D. graduate of Cornell University, has been invited to pay a private visit to his alma mater and to attend the annual

USA-ROC Economic Council Conference in Anchorage,

Alaska;

Whereas there is no legitimate policy grounds for excluding

the democratic leader of Asia’s oldest republic from paying private visits;

Whereas the Senate of the United States voted several times

in 1994 to welcome President Lee to visit the United

States; and

Whereas Public Law 103–416 provides that the President of

Taiwan shall be welcome in the United States at any

time to discuss a host of important bilateral issues: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 President should promptly indicate that the United States
3

•HCON 33 IH

1 will welcome a private visit by President Lee Teng-hui to

2 his alma mater, Cornell University, and will welcome a

3 transit stop by President Lee in Anchorage, Alaska, to at4 tend the USA–ROC Economic Council Conference.

5 SEC. 2. The Clerk of the House of Representatives

6 shall transmit a copy of this concurrent resolution to the

7 President.

Æ
TS-CKHI02

Attachment #6

Pt. 2, Sec. A, 3

Environmental Release and Disposal Info rmation on the New Chemical Substance

at Industrial Sites Controlled by the Submitter
Order entered April 20, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01449-CV

DOUGLAS HUNDERMAN AND DOROTHY HUNDERMAN, Appellants

V.

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, ET AL, Appellees

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-09043

ORDER

Before the Court are appellants’ second motion for extension of time to file 

their opening brief and appellees’ response opposing the motion and seeking 

dismissal of the appeal. We DENY appellees’ request that the appeal be 

dismissed. We GRANT the extension motion and ORDER appellant’s brief be 

filed no later than May 20, 2020.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG 

JUSTICE
§ 31.3306(c)(11)-1 Services in employ of foreign government. ( a ) Services performed by an employee in the employ of a foreign government are excepted from employment. The exception includes not only services performed by ambassadors, ministers, and other diplomatic officers and employees but also services performed as a consular or other officer or employee of a foreign government, or as a nondiplomatic representative thereof.
( b ) For purposes of this exception, the citizenship or residence of the employee is immaterial. It is also immaterial whether the foreign government grants an equivalent exemption with respect to similar services performed in the foreign country by citizens of the United States.
§ 1.665(c)-2 Indirect payments to the beneficiary. ( a ) *In general.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, for purposes of section 665 any amount paid to a U.S. person which is from a payor who is not a U.S. person and which is derived directly or indirectly from a foreign trust created by a U.S. person shall be deemed in the year of payment to the U.S. person to have been directly paid to the U.S. person by the trust. For example, if a nonresident alien receives a distribution from a foreign trust created by a U.S. person and then pays the amount of the distribution over to a U.S. person, the payment of such amount to the U.S. person represents an accumulation distribution to the U.S. person from the trust to the extent that the amount received would have been an accumulation distribution had the trust paid the amount directly to the U.S. person in the year in which the payment was received by the U.S. person. This section also applies in a case where a nonresident alien receives indirectly an accumulation distribution from a foreign trust created by a U.S. person and then pays it over to a U.S. person. An example of such a transaction is one where the foreign trust created by a U.S. person makes the distribution to an intervening foreign trust created by either a U.S. person or a person other than a U.S. person and the intervening trust distributes the amount received to a nonresident alien who in turn pays it over to a U.S. person. Under these circumstances, it is deemed that the payment received by the U.S. person was received directly from a foreign trust created by a U.S. person.
( b ) *Limitation.* In the case of a distribution to a beneficiary who is a U.S. person, paragraph (a) of this section does not apply if the distribution is received by such beneficiary under circumstances indicating lack of intent on the part of the parties to circumvent the purposes for which section 7 of the Revenue Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 985) was enacted.
[T.D. 6989, 34 FR 735, Jan. 17, 1969]
#### State of Indiana, ex rel. Bingham, Attorney-General *v.*Fred Miller Brewing Company of Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

[No. 21,732.

Filed June *24,*1914.]

From Superior Court of Marion County (77,128) ; *Pliny W. Bartholomew,*Judge.

Action by the State of Indiana, on the relation of James Bingham, Attorney-General, against the Fred Miller Brewing Company of Milwaukee, Wisconsin. From a judgment for defendant, the relator appeals.

*Affirmed.*

*James Bingham, W. B. Thompson, B. M. White*and *A. G. Gavins,*for appellant.

*Miller, Shirley & Miller*and *Pickens, Cox £ Kahn,*for appellee.

Cox, C. J.

This action was begun by information in the nature of *quo warranto*brought upon the relation of the Attorney-General against appellee, a manufacturing corporation organized under the laws of Wisconsin and admitted to transact business in this State under laws authorizing it. The complaint or information was, in all material respects, identical with that in *State, ex rel.*v. *Home Brewing Co.*(1914), *ante*75, 105 N. E. 909. A demurrer was addressed to it which, among other causes, challenged the authority of the Attorney-General to exhibit the information by himself as relator. This demurrer was sustained and from that ruling this appeal is brought. The questions involved are the same as in the former case and for the reasons given in the opinion in that case the judgment in this is affirmed.
Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature:

Project No.: 0317.02.005.520 Page 1 of 1

Project Name: 304m 2015 Annual Review CBI?

Yes

No

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD

Incoming

Outgoing

Date: 06/08/15 Time: 3:20 am

pm

Company Name: Iowa Department of Natural Resources ERG Staff Name: Kara Edquist

Contact Name: Wendy Heeb Contact Phone Number: (515) 725-8405

General Subject: Obtaining Tyson Fresh Meats, Columbus Junction, IA permit

TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

June 8th, 2015 at 3:20pm I called Wendy Heeb and left a voicemail.

June 8th, 2015 at 4:40pm Ms. Heeb returned my call and left a voicemail. She explained the permit is still 

expired and waiting on UAA stream designation. The facility is about to obtain a construction permit to extend 

pipe to Cedar River, which would negate the need to wait for UAA stream designation. Once the pipe is in 

place, IA DNR can move forward with permit reissuance. The new application should hopefully get to her 

sometime this year.

On June 12th at 10:14am I called Ms. Heeb and left a voicemail acknowledging we know that the facility falls 

under 40 CFR part 432, Subcategory B, and asking if she would be able to comment on the type of the meat the 

facility processed.

On June 12th at 10:16am Ms. Heeb returned my call and stated it is a swine production (processes hogs) facility.
Order entered January 24 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 01381

- CV

METHODIST HOSPITALS OF DALLAS D/B/A METH ODIST HEALTH SYSTEM AND

D/B/A METHODIST DALL AS ME DICAL CENTER, Appellant

V.

JESUS NIETO, RICHARD O FELIPE NIETO, JESS E NIETO, AND ORLANDO NIETO, EACH INDIVIDUALLY AN D AS HEIRS OF THE ES TATE OF MARY JESSIE

ALVAREZ, DECEASED, Appellee s

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 18

- 02115



### O RDER

Before the Court is appellees’ January 23, 2019 unopposed second motion for extension

of time to file their brief

. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief received by the Court

on January 23, 2019 timely filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
§ 157.6107-1 Tax return preparer must furnish copy of return or claim for refund to taxpayer and must retain a copy or record. ( a ) *In general.* A person who is a signing tax return preparer of any return or claim for refund of tax under section 5891 of the Internal Revenue Code shall furnish a completed copy of the return or claim for refund to the taxpayer and retain a completed copy or record in the manner stated in § 1.6107-1 of this chapter.
( b ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section is applicable to returns and claims for refund filed after December 31, 2008.
[T.D. 9436, 73 FR 78462, Dec. 22, 2008]
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 134

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the

fiscal year 1996, and for other purposes.
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 134

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

1996, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the following sums are hereby appropriated, out of

4 any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated,

5 and out of applicable corporate or other revenues, receipts,
2

•HJ 134 EH

1 and funds, for the several departments, agencies, corpora2 tions and other organizational units of Government for the

3 fiscal year 1996, and for other purposes, namely:

4 SEC. 101. ENSURED PAYMENT DURING FISCAL YEAR 1996

5 OF VETERANS’ BENEFITS IN EVENT OF LACK

6 OF APPROPRIATIONS.

7 (a) PAYMENTS REQUIRED.—In any case during fiscal

8 year 1996 in which appropriations are not otherwise avail9 able for programs, projects, and activities of the Depart10 ment of Veterans Affairs, the Secretary of Veterans Af11 fairs shall nevertheless ensure that—

12 (1) payments of existing veterans benefits are

13 made in accordance with regular procedures and

14 schedules and in accordance with eligibility require15 ments for such benefits; and

16 (2) payments to contractors of the Veterans

17 Health Administration of the Department of Veter18 ans Affairs are made when due in the case of serv19 ices provided that directly relate to patient health

20 and safety.

21 (b) FUNDING.—There is hereby appropriated such

22 sums as may be necessary for the payments pursuant to

23 subsection (a), including such amounts as may be nec24 essary for the costs of administration of such payments.
3

•HJ 134 EH

1 (c) CHARGING OF ACCOUNTS WHEN APPROPRIA2 TIONS MADE.—In any case in which the Secretary uses

3 the authority of subsection (a) to make payments, applica4 ble accounts shall be charged for amounts so paid, and

5 for the costs of administration of such payments, when

6 regular appropriations become available for those pur7 poses.

8 (d) EXISTING BENEFITS SPECIFIED.—For purposes

9 of this section, existing veterans benefits are benefits

10 under laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Af11 fairs that have been adjudicated and authorized for pay12 ment as of—

13 (1) December 15, 1995; or

14 (2) if appropriations for such benefits are avail15 able (other than pursuant to subsection (b)) after

16 December 15, 1995, the last day on which appro17 priations for payment of such benefits are available

18 (other than pursuant to subsection (b)).

Passed the House of Representatives December 20,

1995.

Attest:

Clerk.
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.6224(a)-1 Participation in administrative proceedings. ( a ) *In general.* Every partner in the partnership, including an indirect partner, has the right to participate in any phase of administrative proceedings. However, except as provided in section 6223 and the regulations thereunder, neither the Internal Revenue Service nor the tax matters partner is required to provide notice of any proceeding to the partners. Consequently, a partner who wishes, for example, to be present during a preliminary discussion between an examining agent and the tax matters partner should make special arrangements with the tax matters partner to obtain information as to the time and place of the discussion. The Internal Revenue Service and the tax matters partner will determine the time and place for all administrative proceedings. Arrangements will generally not be changed merely for the convenience of another partner.
( b ) *Effective date.* This section is applicable to partnership taxable years beginning on or after October 4, 2001. For years beginning prior to October 4, 2001, see § 301.6224(a)-1T contained in 26 CFR part 1, revised April 1, 2001.
[T.D. 8965, 66 FR 50551, Oct. 4, 2001]
EXHIBIT 32.2

                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                     OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Giant Industries, Inc.
("Giant") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Mark B. Cox, Chief Financial Officer of Giant, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (a)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (b)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Giant.


                                       By: /s/ MARK B. COX
                                         -------------------------------
                                       Name:   Mark B. Cox
                                       Title:  Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 9, 2007
8% UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

~ REGION IX

~

_____ 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 941 05-3901 L PRO~ 

## APR 2 12016 Mr. Richard W. Corey, Executive Officer CaliforniaAir Resources Board Post Office Bo42815 Sacrament~~frflfomia 95812 Dear orey: On Ai1~il 6, 2016, CARB submitted a revision to the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). We have reviewed the materials submitted with the following document and found thattheyfulfill the completeness criteria in 40 CFR Part 51, AppendixV.

AQMD Title ofPlan El Dorado Ozone Emergency Episode Plan This addresses the only revision in this submittal. In the coming months we will reviewthe complete revision foraction pursuantto Clean AirAct section 110(k). Questions regarding our completeness review should be directed to Arnold Lazarus at (415) 972-3024. Sincerely,

~hJordan~~~ Director, Air Division Mr. DaveJohnston Air Pollution Control Officer El Dorado CountyAirQuality Management District Ms. Karen Magliano, Chief Air Quality Planning and Science Division CaliforniaAirResources Board

Printed on 100% Posiconsumer Recycled Paper Process Chlorine Free.