alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 10.3
 
 ARBITRATION AND NOTICE OF FINAL AGREEMENT
 To:
    
    Craftmade International, Inc., a Delaware corporation650 S. Royal LaneCoppell, Texas 75019(collectively, whether one or more, Borrower)
 Lender Loan
 ARBITRATION
 Loan Documents




---



##### 



FACSIMILE DOCUMENTS AND SIGNATURES
 fax
 WAIVER OF RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY
  NOTICE OF FINAL AGREEMENT
 Other Obligors Written Loan Agreement




---



##### 



THE WRITTEN LOAN AGREEMENT REPRESENTS THE FINAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PARTIES AND MAY NOT BE
CONTRADICTED BY EVIDENCE OF PRIOR, CONTEMPORANEOUS, OR SUBSEQUENT ORAL AGREEMENTS OF THE PARTIES.
 THERE ARE NO UNWRITTEN ORAL AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE PARTIES.
  BORROWER
    
    LENDER:CRAFTMADE INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
    
    THE FROST NATIONAL BANK,a Delaware corporation
    
    a national banking associationBy:
    
    /s/ Brad Heimann
    
    By:
    
    /s/ D. Michael RandallBrad Heimann, Executive Vice President
    
    
    
    D. Michael Randall, Senior Vice PresidentOTHER OBLIGORS:DESIGN TRENDS, LLC,a Delaware limited liability companyBy:
    
    Craftmade International, Inc.,a Delaware corporation, ManagerBy:
    
    /s/ Brad HeimannBrad Heimann, Executive Vice PresidentDUROCRAFT INTERNATIONAL, INC.,a Texas corporationBy:
    
    /s/ Brad HeimannBrad Heimann, Secretary




---



##### 



TRADE SOURCE INTERNATIONAL, INC.,a California corporationBy:
    
    /s/ Brad HeimannBrad Heimann, SecretaryC/D/R INCORPORATED,a Delaware corporationBy:
    
    /s/ Clifford CrimmingsClifford Crimmings, V.P. Marketing
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Craftmade
International, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that: The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 (the Form 10-Q) of
the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and
for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q. Date: February 9, 2005
    
    /s/ Brad Dale HeimannBrad Dale HeimannExecutive Vice President andInterim Chief Financial Officer
 The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item
601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being
filed as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made
before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
#### § 157.6061-1 Signing of returns and other documents.

Any return, statement, or other document required to be made with respect to a tax imposed by chapter 55 (Structured Settlement Factoring Transactions) of the Internal Revenue Code or the regulations under chapter 55 must be signed by the person required to file the return, statement, or other document, or by the persons required or duly authorized to sign in accordance with the regulations, forms, or instructions prescribed with respect to such return, statement, or document. An individual's signature on such return, statement, or other document shall be prima facie evidence that the individual is authorized to sign the return, statement, or other document.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Encorium Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Philip L. Calamia, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Philip L. Calamia                                                           
|Philip L. Calamia Interim Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)

August 14, 2008

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or
as a separate disclosure document.



E-4
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage Servicing**D1086-120, 12th Floor550 South Tryon StreetCharlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 **ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**  Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and  Servicing  Agreement  dated as of October 1, 2015, by and among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE  SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as General Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS, LLC, as General Special Servicer, NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BANK, N.A., as NCB Master Servicer, NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BANK, N.A., as NCB Special Servicer, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as One Court Square Special Servicer, PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, as  Tax Administrator and as Custodian and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-NXS3 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that: 1. A review of the activities of the General Master Servicer during the period from October 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the General Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.  /s/ Daniel BoberDaniel BoberExecutive Vice PresidentWells Fargo Bank   

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
Martin, Michael (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

Gary E Williams <GEWilliams@KakeFirstNation.org> 

Wednesday, October 10, 2012 3:15 PM 

Martin, Michael (OST); rich.sewell@alaska.gov; citymanager@cityofkake.org 

bruce@btpost.net; hank@hankm.com; tsieber@seaportair.com; Tom@WardAir.com 

RE: SeaPort Airlines Petition - Request for Comments 

Kake EAS, OVK recommendation letter t-DOT.PDF; RE: Essential Air Service proposals at 

Kake and Excursion Inlet 

Attn: Michael Martin, U.S. DOT EAS & SCASDP Programs 

After presentation by both Wings of Alaska I SeaPort Airlines and also Air Excursions I Alaska Seaplanes at the Organized 

Village of Kake's (OVK) 10105/12 IRA Tribal Council meeting here in Kake Alaska, the OVK council passed a motion to 

reaffirm the tribal government's earlier recommendation for Air Excursions LLC as OVK's preferred provider under the 

EAS program (see attached). 

If a formal letter is needed for this latest comment, please advise; otherwise we will assume this email to reaffirm the 

tribe's recommendation will suffice. As always, thank you for your work to ensure the important Essential Air Service 

contract is in place to help fill the unquestionable need for "essential air service" in our rural community. 

Best regards, 

Gary E. Williams, 

Executive Director 

Organized Village of Kake 

P.O. Box 316 

Kake, AK 99830-0316 

direct office email: GEWilliams@KakeFirstNation.org 

office phone: 907-785-6471 x111 fax: 907-785-4902 

cellphone: 907-321-3577 

From: Michaei.F.Martin@dot.gov [mailto:Michaei.F.Martin@dot.gov] 

Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2012 10:42 AM 

To: rich.sewell@alaska.gov; gewilliams@kakefirstnation.org; citymanager@citvofkake.org 

Cc: bruce@btpost.net; hank@hankm.com; tsieber@seaportair.com; Tom@WardAir.com 

Subject: SeaPort Airlines Petition - Request for Comments 

Everyone: 

I recently e-mailed you documents pertaining to a Petition for Reconsideration submitted by SeaPort Airlines regarding 

the recent EAS selection order at Kake and Excursion Inlet. We would like to give the Alaska DOT and the communities 

the opportunity to offer any comments on the record with regard to SeaPort's petition before we submit a 

recommendation to the Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs. In case you no longer have the e-mail 

I sent, I have attached SeaPort's petition and Air Excursion's response. 

We request that you review the attached documents and submit any comments you may have as soon as possible, but 

no later than Friday. October 19. Please send your comments via e-mail to EAS@dot.gov. If you have any questions, 

feel free to contact me. 

1 
Regards, 

Michael Martin 

United States Department of Transportation 

Essential Air Service (EAS) and Small Community Air Service Development Program (SCASDP) 

(2,02) 366-6494 

2
§ 1.507-4 Imposition of tax. ( a ) *General rule.* Section 507(c) imposes on each organization the private foundation status of which is terminated under section 507(a) a tax equal to the lower of: ( 1 ) The amount which such organization substantiates by adequate records (or other corroborating evidence which may be required by the Commissioner) as the aggregate tax benefit (as defined in section 507(d)) resulting from the section 501(c)(3) status of such organization, or
( 2 ) The value of the net assets of such organization.
( b ) *Transfers not subject to section 507(c).* Private foundations which make transfers described in section 507(b)(1)(A) or (2) are not subject to the tax imposed under section 507(c) with respect to such transfers unless the provisions of section 507(a) become applicable. See §§ 1.507-1(b), 1.507-2(a)(6) and 1.507-3(d).
[T.D. 7233, 37 FR 28161, Dec. 21, 1972]
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.6361-5 Effective date of section 6361.

Section 6361 shall take effect on the first January 1 which is more than 1 year after the first date on which at least one State has filed a notice of election with the Secretary or his delegate to enter into a State agreement. For purposes of this section, a notice of election shall be deemed to have been filed by a State only if there is no defect in either the State's notice of election or the State's tax law of which the Secretary notified the Governor pursuant to paragraph (c) of § 301.6363-1, and which has not been retroactively cured under the provisions of such paragraph.

[T.D. 7577, 43 FR 59365, Dec. 20, 1978]
APPENDIX II 

MATES III 

FINAL REPORT 

MATES III Technical Advisory Group
MATES III Final Report

Appendix II-1 

Appendix II 

MATES III Technical Advisory Group 

 Member Name Affiliation

L.A. County Sanitation Districts 

Cal EPA Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment 

General Motors 

Desert Research Institute 

Integrated Environmental Sciences 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Southern California Edison 

Center for Environmental Research and Technology 

University of California, Los Angeles 

Health Effects Institute 

Health Effects Institute 

Consultant 

Engine Manufacturers Association 

California Small Business Alliance 

East Yard Communities for Environmental Justice 

Sonoma Technology 

City of Santa Monica 

California Air Resources Board 

California Air Resources Board 

California Council for Environmental and Economic Balance 

University of Southern California 

Loma Linda University 

Consultant 

Greg Adams 

Robert Blaisdell 

Steven Cadle 

Judith Chow 

Steve Colome 

Bob Devlin 

Rob Farber 

Dennis Fitz 

John Froines 

Dan Greenbaum 

Debra Kaden 

Dean High 

Mike Lakin 

Bill LaMarr 

Angelo Logan 

Fred Lurmann 

Rod Merl 

Dale Shimp 

Shankar Prasad 

Bill Quinn 

Constantino Sioutas 

Samuel Soret 

Mel Zeldin
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2022-3841

_____________________________

VIKAS KAPOOR,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Joshua M. Hawkes, Judge.

May 29, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BILBREY, WINOKUR, and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Robert David Malove of the Law Office of Robert David Malove, 

P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Damaris E. Reynolds, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7036

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DUANE CURTIS CHASE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, Chief District Judge. (CR-03-483-BEL; CA-05-1315-BEL) Submitted: November 18, 2005 Decided: December 6, 2005 Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Duane Curtis Chase, Appellant Pro Se. Bonnie S. Greenberg, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Duane Curtis Chase, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find both that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336- 38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Chase has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Translations on telecommunicationspolicy, research and development.**
 
SuDoc Number: Y3.J 66:13/:
CGP systemNumber: 000923177
 
December 28, 2017
 
 
**1977:
N13_14_Sep_1977.pdf
n1_18_May_1977.pdf
n2_24_May_1977.pdf
n3_6_Jun_1977.pdf
n4_14_Jun_1977.pdf
n5_23_Jun_1977.pdf
n6_5_Jul_1977.pdf
n7_15_Jul    1977.pdf
n8_28_Jul_1977.pdf
n9_4_Aug_1977.pdf
n10_19_Aug_1977.pdf
n11_26_Aug_1977.pdf
n12_7_Sep_1977.pdf
n14_23_Sep_1977.pdf
n15_29_Sep_1977.pdf
n16_12_Oct_1977.pdf
n17_18_Oct_1977.pdf
n18_27_Oct_1977.pdf
n19_9_Nov_1977.pdf
n21_21_Nov_1977.pdf
n22_29_Nov_1977.pdf
n23_12_Dec_1977.pdf
n24_19_Dec_1977.pdf
n25_28_Dec_1977.pdf
 

**1978
n26_6_Jan_1978_1.pdf
n26_6_Jan_1978_2.pdf
n27_19_Jan_1978.pdf
n28_9_Feb_1978.pdf
n35_28_Apr_1978.pdf
n39_6_Jun_1978.pdf
n40_13_Jun_1978.pdf
n41_21_Jun_1978.pdf
n44_7_Jul_1978.pdf
n45_11_Jul_1978.pdf
n46_18_Jul_1978.pdf
n48_2_Aug_1978.pdf
n49_11_Aug_1978.pdf
n50_16_Aug_1978.pdf
n51_18_Aug_1978.pdf
n52_7_Sep_1978.pdf
n53_14_Sep_1978.pdf
n54_22_Sep_1978.pdf
n55_12_Oct_1978.pdf
n56_18_Oct_1978.pdf
n57_27_Oct_1978.pdf
n58_6_Nov_1978.pdf
n59_14_Nov_1978.pdf
 

 ****
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Re:          Annual Statement of Compliance for Banc of America Merrill Lynch Large LoanInc. Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-ISQR

 

Per the Trust and ServicingAgreement dated as of August 17, 2016 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 24, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
§ 157.6001-1 Records, statements, and special returns. ( a ) *In general.* Any person subject to tax under chapter 55 (Structured Settlement Factoring Transactions) of the Internal Revenue Code must keep such complete and detailed records as are sufficient to enable the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to determine accurately the amount of liability under chapter 55.
( b ) *Notice by the IRS requiring returns, statements, or the keeping of records.* The IRS may require any person, by notice served upon him, to make such returns, render such statements, or keep such specific records as will enable the IRS to determine whether or not the person is liable for tax under chapter 55.
( c ) *Retention of records.* The records required by this section must be kept at all times available for inspection by the IRS, and shall be retained so long as the contents thereof may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of Owl Rock Capital Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to the undersigned’s knowledge:

 

1) the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) as applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2) the information contained in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

|                         |        |        |                                                     |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
| Date: February 23, 2022 |   | By:    | /s/ Jonathan Lamm                                   |
|                    |   |   | Jonathan Lamm                                       |
|                    |   |   | Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 76 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 76

  Expressing respect and affection for the flag of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 14, 1995

    Mr. Skaggs (for himself and Mr. Kolbe) submitted the following 
   concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing respect and affection for the flag of the United States.
Whereas freedom and liberty protected by the Constitution are fundamental and 
        precious rights of each American;
Whereas the flag of the United States is an historic and revered symbol of that 
        freedom and liberty;
Whereas generations of Americans have fought with valor under the flag to 
        protect the sacred values it represents;
Whereas all the people of the United States, and their representatives in 
        Congress, should show respect and affection for the flag;
Whereas the flag has been a source of inspiration for freedom-seeking people 
        around the world;
Whereas deeply held respect and affection for the flag have caused many to 
        propose an amendment to the Constitution to protect the flag from 
        desecration; and
Whereas an amendment to the Constitution, expanding the powers of government to 
        prohibit offensive behavior, would entail a limitation on freedoms 
        previously protected under the First Amendment: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress of the United States expresses deep respect and 
affection for the flag of the United States, and states its abiding 
trust in the freedom and liberty which the flag symbolizes.
                                 <all>
```