alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### New Releases

                        - Jails in Indian Country, 2023   
                        - Criminal Victimization, 2023   
                        - Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Cases in Federal Courts, 2012–2022   
                        - Socio-Emotional Consequences of Violent Crime, 2022   
                        - Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program, 2023   
                        - Tribal Crime Data Collection Activities, 2024   
                        - Report on Indicators of School Crime and Safety: 2023 and Indicator 2: Incidence of Nonfatal Victimization at School and Away From School

View more new releases

#### Jails in Indian Country, 2023

This report provides statistics on the demographic characteristics, most serious offense, and conviction status of persons held in Indian country jails...

Read more

#### Criminal Victimization, 2023

This report presents official estimates of nonfatal criminal victimizations reported and not reported to police from BJS’s...

Read more

## **Corrections Statistical Analysis Tool (CSAT) - Prisoners **

View Archived Featured Content

----

#### Data by Topic

Access the latest datasets and documentation by topic.

#### Open Funding Opportunities

Find FY24 Funding opportunities available from BJS.

#### Data Analysis Tools

Access data tools and dashboards featuring custom datasets and visualizations.

#### Learn about BJS Research

Discover BJS 3rd party reports and other research papers.

## Announcements

Public comments requested on reinstating a previously approved data collection with changes: Census of Public Defender Offices

Corrections Statistical Analysis Tool (CSAT) - Prisoners

New Unit Chief of the Statistical Methods Unit, Melissa Cidade

Public comments requested on the Reinstatement, With Change, of a Previously Approved Collection: 2024 Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics (LEMAS) Survey

New Deputy Director of Planning and Operations, James McDaniel

View More Announcements

Learn about BJS Programs

### Learn about BJS Programs

Learn about Funding

### Learn about Funding

Access Resources

### Access Resources

Browse all Topics

### Browse all Topics

## BJS Facebook

>
#### In the Matter of Alex Rivero, Respondent, v Robert Ferraro, et al., Appellants.

[808 NYS2d 111]

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Board of Zoning Appeals of the Incorporated Village of Lynbrook, dated October 23, 2003, which, after a hearing, denied the petitioner’s application for certain area variances, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Galasso, J.), dated August 2, 2004, which vacated the determination and granted the application.-

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits.

In determining whether to grant an area variance, a zoning board of appeals is required by Village Law § 7-712-b (3) to engage in a balancing test weighing the benefit to the applicant against the detriment to the health, safety, and welfare of the *480neighborhood or community if the variance is granted *(see Matter of Sasso v Osgood,*86 NY2d 374 [1995]). The zoning board is also required to consider whether (1) an undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood, or a detriment to nearby properties will be created by the granting of the area variance, (2) the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some other method, other than an area variance, feasible for the applicant to pursue, (3) the required area variance is substantial, (4) the proposed variance will have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district, and (5) the alleged difficulty was self-created *(see*Village Law § 7-712-b [3]; *Matter of Ifrah v Utschig,*98 NY2d 304, 307-308 [2002]; *Matter of Easy Home Program v Trotta,*276 AD2d 553 [2000]).

Local zoning boards have broad discretion in considering applications for variances, and judicial review is limited to determining whether the. action taken by the board was illegal, arbitrary, or an abuse of discretion *(see Matter of Ifrah v Utschig, supra*at 308; *Matter of Sasso v Osgood, supra*at 384; *Matter of Stone Landing Corp. v Board of Appeals of Vil. of Amityville,*5 AD3d 496 [2004]). Thus, the determination of a zoning board should be sustained upon judicial review if it had a rational basis, was not arbitrary and capricious, and was supported by substantial evidence *(see Matter of Ifrah v Utschig, supra; Matter of Milburn Homes v Trotta,*7 AD3d 531 [2004]; *Matter of Gold Mark 35*Assoc. *v Town of Somers,*263 AD2d 483 [1999]).

Under the circumstances of this case, the denial of the petitioner’s application by the Board of Zoning Appeals of the Incorporated Village of Lynbrook had a rational basis, was not arbitrary and capricious, and was supported by substantial evidence *(see Matter of Ifrah v Utschig, supra; Matter of Ceballos v Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Town of Mount Pleasant,*304 AD2d 575 [2003]). Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Luciano and Lifson, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0368 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,
v. THOMAS WILLIAM SIGEA,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including March 5 , 2021 within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 28 2021

01/28/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0368
§ 1.852-1 Taxation of regulated investment companies. ( a ) *Requirements applicable thereto* — ( 1 ) *In general.* Section 852(a) denies the application of the provisions of part I, subchapter M, chapter 1 of the Code (other than section 852(c), relating to earnings and profits), to a regulated investment company for a taxable year beginning after February 28, 1958, unless— ( i ) The deduction for dividends paid for such taxable year as defined in section 561 (computed without regard to capital gain dividends) is equal to at least 90 percent of its investment company taxable income for such taxable year (determined without regard to the provisions of section 852(b)(2)(D) and paragraph (d) of § 1.852-3); and
( ii ) The company complies for such taxable year with the provisions of § 1.852-6 (relating to records required to be maintained by a regulated investment company). See section 853(b)(1)(B) and paragraph (a) of § 1.853-2 for amounts to be added to the dividends paid deduction, and section 855 and § 1.855-1, relating to dividends paid after the close of the taxable year.
( 2 ) *Special rule for taxable years of regulated investment companies beginning before March 1, 1958.* The provisions of part I of subchapter M (including section 852(c)) are not applicable to a regulated investment company for a taxable year beginning before March 1, 1958, unless such company meets the requirements of section 852(a) and subparagraph (1) (i) and (ii) of this paragraph.
( b ) *Failure to qualify.* If a regulated investment company does not meet the requirements of section 852(a) and paragraph (a)(1) (i) and (ii) of this section for the taxable year, it will, even though it may otherwise be classified as a regulated investment company, be taxed in such year as an ordinary corporation and not as a regulated investment company. In such case, none of the provisions of part I of subchapter M (other than section 852(c) in the case of taxable years beginning after February 28, 1958) will be applicable to it. For the rules relating to the applicability of section 852(c), see § 1.852-5.
[T.D. 6598, 27 FR 4091, Apr. 28, 1962]
**~t..** ..... STATE OFMISSOURI JeremiahW (Jay) Nixon, Governor • Sara Parker Pauley, Director 

# DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
www.dnr
.mo.gov April 19, 2016
Mr. Mark Hague ActingRegional Administrator U.S. EPA, Region VII 11201 RennerBoulevard Lenexa, KS 66219 Re: Missouri Department ofNatural Resources' (department) Response to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) proposed area designations DearMr. Hague: This letter and attached enhanced technical analysis is in response to EPA's February 16, 2016 letter and Technical SupportDocument (TSD) titled "Missouri AreaDesignations for the 2010 S02PrimaryNational AmbientAir Quality Standard." EPA's letter served as notification to the state thatEPA intends to modify Missouri's original recomn1endation. This letter and attachments reaffirm and supplement ourpreviously submitted recommendations dated September 25,2015. The enclosed technical analysis provides detailed information that supports Missouri's original recommendation as well as addresses the concerns and issues raised by EPA in the received letter and TSD. Missouri's supplemental technical support documentation is contained in Attachment 1. The table below summarizes our arearecommendations for the July 2, 2016 round of designations. 

### R a'lons b

- our SO S d J I lssoun 

### 'A ecommend 

### f th 2010 1 h d 2016 DeSlgnatlons rea or e 2 tan ar : uy . 

### Area Designation Recommended Boundary Affected Area Recommendations Sikeston All ofScott County Attainment Sibley Portion ofJackson County Attainment Labadie N/A Unclassifiable



# o Rl"',Hlrd I'"p(-r

### Mr. Mark Hague Page Two
Thank you for your attention to this matter. Ifyou have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact Ms. Darcy Bybee with the Missouri Department ofNatural Resources' Air Pollution Control Program at P.o. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102 or by telephone at (573) 751-4817. Sincerely, AIR POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAM
Kyra L. Moore Director KLM:akc Enclosures: Attachments 1-3 Electronic copy ofthe letter and attachments
c: Missouri Air Conservation Commission Project# 2010-SOr4 Consent Decree
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 14, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, January 14, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A21A0738. JAMISON ONIS CORLEY v. KIMBERLY MARIE JACKSON.

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW 

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion the hereby GRANTED, and 

jurisdiction is released back to the trial court upon receipt of this order.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE PRODUCER
ENTERTAINMENT GROUP LTD'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                        (27,398)
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,770,441
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,363,171
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         178,898
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,548,305
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    652,250
<COMMON>                                       831,457
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,548,305
<SALES>                                        304,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               304,100
<CGS>                                          (1,347)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              (1,476,687)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (115,015)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (986,196)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (5,304)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (991,500)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,097,758)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)
<FN>
<F1>THE COMPANY HAS ELECTED TO PRESENT AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-93,064-01
IN RE BILL Y RAY BUTLER, Relator
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF M ANDAM US CAUSE NO. 241-1055-16 IN THE 241ST DISTRICT COURT

F ROM SMITH COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R Relator has filed a motion for leave to file an application for a writ of mandamus under this Court’s orig inal jurisdiction. He contends that he filed an application for a writ of habea s corpus in Smit h County

and his applica tion has not been prope rly forwa rded to this Court. Respondent, the District Clerk of Smit h County , shall forwa rd Relator’s habea s application to this Court, respond that Relator has not filed a habea s application in Smit h County , or forwa rd a copy of an order desig nating issues toge ther with corr espondenc e documenting the date the State
rec eived Relator’s habea s application. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(c) and (d); T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 5). This motion for leave to file will be held. Respondent shall comply with this order within thirty

day s from the da

te of this order
.2

Filed: September

29, 2021 Do not publish
§ 1.662(a)-1 Inclusion of amounts in gross income of beneficiaries of estates and complex trusts; general. There is included in the gross income of a beneficiary of an estate or complex trust the sum of: ( a ) Amounts of income required to be distributed currently to him, and
( b ) All other amounts properly paid, credited, or required to be distributed to him
by the estate or trust. The preceding sentence is subject to the rules contained in § 1.662(a)-2 (relating to currently distributable income), § 1.662(a)-3 (relating to other amounts distributed), and §§ 1.662(b)-1 and 1.662(b)-2 (relating to character of amounts). Section 662 has no application to amounts excluded under section 663(a).
§ 20.6109-1 Tax return preparers furnishing identifying numbers for returns or claims for refund. ( a ) *In general.* Each estate tax return or claim for refund prepared by one or more signing tax return preparers must include the identifying number of the preparer required by § 1.6695-1(b) of this chapter to sign the return or claim for refund in the manner stated in § 1.6109-2 of this chapter.
( b ) *Effective/applicability date.* Paragraph (a) of this section is applicable to returns and claims for refund filed after December 31, 2008.
[T.D. 9436, 73 FR 78450, Dec. 22, 2008]
----

Publication of an application pursuant to Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs

(2006/C 320/07)

This publication confers the right to object to the application pursuant to Article 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006. Statements of objection must reach the Commission within six months from the date of this publication.

SUMMARY

COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 510/2006

Application for registration according to Article 5 and Article 17(2)

‘MEJILLÓN DE GALICIA’ or ‘MEXILLÓN DE GALICIA’

EC No: ES/PDO/005/0156/10.10.2000

PDO ( X ) PGI ( )

This summary has been drawn up for information only. For full details, interested parties are invited to consult the full version of the product specification obtainable from the national authorities indicated in section 1 or from the European Commission (1).

1.   Responsible department in the Member State:

2.   Group:

3.   Type of product:

Class 1.7.: Fresh fish, molluscs and crustaceans and products derived therefrom

4.   Specification (summary of requirements under Article 4(2))

----

(1)  European Commission, Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, Agricultural Product Quality Policy, B-1049 Brussels.

----
##### 



Exhibit 32 Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc. (the
company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that: The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004
(the Form 10-Q), of the company fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the company. Dated: May 6, 2004 /s/ William J. Doyle
William J. DoylePresident and Chief Executive Officer
 Dated: May 6, 2004 /s/ Wayne R. Brownlee
Wayne R. BrownleeSenior Vice President, Treasurer, and Chief
Financial Officer
 The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form
10-Q pursuant to Item 601(6)(32) of Regulation S-K, section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part
of the Form 10-Q.
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

** **

** **

Reference is herebymade to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1,2016, by and among J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., asDepositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, MidlandLoan Services, A Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as SpecialServicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator,Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, and Pentalpha SurveillanceLLC, as Operating Advisor and as Asset Representations Reviewer, with respectto Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2016-C4 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section11.09 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.           A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period fromJanuary 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.           To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day ofFebruary 2019.

 

 

/s/ Leslie Hayton

Leslie Hayton 

Managing Director 

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 153 (Tuesday, August 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 40281]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19218]



[[Page 40281]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Delegation of Authority No. 326 ]


Delegation by the Secretary of State as Chairperson of the Board 
of the Millennium Challenge Corporation to the Vice President for 
Compact Implementation

    By virtue of the authority vested in me as Chairperson of the Board 
of Directors of the Millennium Challenge Corporation by Section 18 of 
Article I of the Bylaws and other relevant provisions of the bylaws and 
law, including Section 614(d) of the Millennium Challenge Act, 2003, 
and Section 1(a)(4) of the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 
1956, I hereby delegate to Darius Mans, Vice President for Compact 
Implementation, to the extent authorized by law, the functions, duties 
and powers of the chief executive officer, to be exercised subject to 
my direction.
    Any authorities covered by this delegation may also be exercised by 
me and may be redelegated to the extent authorized by law.
    This delegation shall enter into effect on July 31, 2009 and shall 
expire upon the appointment and entry upon duty of a new Chief 
Executive Officer pursuant to Section 604(b) of the Millennium 
Challenge Act of 2003.
    This delegation of authority shall be published in the Federal 
Register.

    Dated: July 15, 2009/
Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E9-19218 Filed 8-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-07-P
HE .!~ATTORNEY GENERAL 0~ TEXAS

Dear Sir: Opinion No. O-7070 Re: Exemption andrates of tax applicable to a city in computing inheritance taxes. 

### 1946, We are inreceipt ofyour letter of January 28, which requests the opinion of this Department as to the exemption andrate of tax applicable toBay City, Texas, in computing inheritance taxes arising from atransaction with V. L. Le Tulle, deceased.

A close examination of ths inheritance tax skatutes shows that no tax is laidupon acity. A city cannot possibly come within any of the classes taxes sxcept Class E--Foreign bequest, the applicable pcrtion ofwhich reads as follows:

"Ifpassing to or for theuse of theUnited States, to or for theuse of any other person or religious, educational or charitable organization or institution, or to any other person, corporation or association not included in any of the classes mentioned in theprecedingporticns of-the original Act known asChapter 29 of theGeneral kaws ofthe Second Called Session of the ~lhirty-eTghthLegislature, the tax shall be:

. . *It '(Emphasisours) Section

### 4, aspreceding portion of the original Act, mentions and lays an inheritance tax upon cities although subsequent legislative revisions of the inheritance tax statutes resulted in the omission of cities from any of the classes taxed.

Therefore, you are advised that since a city does not come within any of the classes taxed neither the estate ofV. L. Le Tulle nor the city ofBay City, Texas, is liable for any inheritance tax arising from the transaction about which you inquired. WIE:na/pam APPROVED MAR 13 1946 Yours very truly Carlos Ashley ATTORNEY GENERAL OF T,EXAS First Assistant Attorney General BY Woodrow H. Edwards Assistant THINSOPINION CONSIDERED ,ANDAPPROVED IN LIMITED CONFERENCE