alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1.6050B-1 Information returns by person making unemployment compensation payments.

For taxable years beginning after December 31, 1978, every person who makes payments of unemployment compensation (as defined in section 85 (c)) aggregating $10 or more to any individual during any calendar year shall file a Form 1099UC in accordance with the instructions to such form.

[T.D. 7705, 45 FR 46070, July 9, 1980]
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D20-3515

_____________________________

NAKIA CAMPBELL,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel—

Original Jurisdiction.

September 23, 2021

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate 

counsel is denied on the merits.

ROWE, C.J., and LEWIS and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Nakia Campbell, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and David Welch, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
SCPW-20-0000433
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I
MARSHALL MARTINEZ, Petitioner,

vs. M. FRINK, Warden, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CR. NO. 2PC000007716(1))
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Wilson, JJ., and Circuit Judge Johnson, assigned by reason of vacancy) Upon consideration of petitioner Marshall Martinez’s petition for writ of habeas corpus, filed on June 29, 2020, the documents attached thereto and submitted in support thereof, and the record, it appears that petitioner presents no special reason for this court to invoke its jurisdiction and has alternative means to seek relief. See Oili v. Chang, 54 Haw. 411, 412, 557 P.2d 787, 788 (1976). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-20-0000433 13-JUL-2020 08:53 AMIT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the

appellate court shall process the petition for writ of habeas corpus without payment of the filing fee.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, July 13, 2020. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Ronald G. Johnson

2
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 3 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 3

   Expressing the sense of the Congress that the Office of Personnel 
Management should provide certain vocational rehabilitation services in 
 its administration of the civil service disability retirement program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

Mrs. Collins of Illinois submitted the following concurrent resolution; 
 which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the sense of the Congress that the Office of Personnel 
Management should provide certain vocational rehabilitation services in 
 its administration of the civil service disability retirement program.

Whereas individuals under the civil service disability retirement program should 
        have the option of resuming useful employment after their careers are 
        interrupted by severe injury;
Whereas vocational rehabilitation methods, such as selective job referral, 
        retraining, and career counseling, have progressed to the point where 
        they represent cost-effective, as well as humane, alternatives to 
        continued dependence on disability benefits;
Whereas the former Federal policy favoring the rehiring of injured employees has 
        been curtailed because of recent hiring ceilings; and
Whereas vocational rehabilitation is used throughout the insurance industry as 
        well as under Federal workmen's compensation law, and should be a part 
        of the Office of Personnel Management's functions in administering the 
        civil service disability retirement program: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that the Office of Personnel 
Management should identify those individuals under the disability 
retirement provisions of title 5, United States Code, who could benefit 
from vocational rehabilitation and should advise such annuitants of the 
various vocational rehabilitation programs available to them, including 
those administered by the United States Employment Service and State 
vocational education divisions.
                                 <all>
```
MEMORANDUM 

To: GSFL and IRL Docket Number: EE-2006-STD-0131 

Date: December 23, 2008 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

This memo provides documentation of a phone conversation held on December 8, 

2008 between a contractor of the U.S. Department of Energy, Mahima Gupta (Navigant 

Consulting, Inc.) and Edward Yandek of General Electric Consumer & Industrial, 

Manager-Worldwide Industry Standards. During the conversation between Ms. Gupta 

and Mr. Yandek, Ms. Gupta gained further clarification on NEMA's position regarding its 

suggested amendments to the definition of "colored fluorescent lamp." In particular, Mr. 

Yandek explained why it would be appropriate to set standards for fluorescent lamps with 

a correlated color temperature (CCT) of 7,000K, but not higher CCT lamps. Mr. Yandek 

explained that manufacturers would likely produce a lamp at 7,000K using the same 

materials as common 6,500K lamps. However, Mr. Yandek indicated that producing a 

lamp with a CCT higher than 7,000K would likely require significant changes in 

materials and, thus, would likely have different design trade-offs than lamps with lower 

CCTs. 

EE-2006-STD-0131 COMMENT 29
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 13-639V

Filed: January 12, 2016

Not for P ublication

*************************************

SHERRY KACHMARIK , *

*

Petitioner

, * * Attorneys’ fees and costs decision based on

* stipulation of fact

v. *

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

* Respondent. *

*

*************************************

Michael D. Bell , Toledo, OH, for petitioner.

Althea W. Davis , Washington, DC, for respondent.

MILLMAN, Special Master

DECISION AWARDING ATTORNEYS ’ FEES AND COSTS 1

On January 12, 2016, the parties filed a stipulation of fact in which they agreed on an appropriate amount for attorneys’ fees and costs in this case

.

I n accordance with t he General Order #9 requirement, petitioner asserts that she did not incur any costs in pursuit of her petition. Petitione r submitted a draft application for attorneys’ fees and costs to respondent. During informal discussions, respondent raised objections to certain items in petitioner’s application . Petitioner now requests reimbursement for attorneys’ fees and

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation f or the special master’s action in this case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal

Claims’ s website, in accordance with the E

- Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107

- 347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special master s will be made available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of priva cy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and

move to redact such information prior to the document = s disclosure. If the special master, upon review, agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall

redact such material from public access.costs in th e amount of $11,010.00. Respondent does not object to this amount. The undersigned finds this amount to be reasonable. Accordingly, the court awards $11,010.00 , representing reimbursement for attorneys’ fees and costs. The award shall be in the form of a chec k payable jointly to petitioner and Gallon, Takacs, Boissoneault & Schaffer Co., L.P.A. in the amount of $11,010.00

.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment herewith. 2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 12, 2016 s/ Laura D. Millman

Laura D. Millman

Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party , either separately or jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.

2
# Aleutian PribilofIsland Community DevelopmentAssociation 234 Gold Street • Juneau, Alaska 99801 • (907) 586-0161 • Fax: (907) 586-0165 717 KStreet, Suite 100 •Anchorage, Alaska 99501 • (907) 929-5273 • Fax: (907) 929-5275

October 27, 2012 Mr. Dennis 

### J. DeVany Chief EAS and Domestic Analysis U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, SE Washington DC 20590 Re: DOT Order# 2012-8-39 APICDA comments on EAS proposal by Grant Aviation at Akun, Alaska

Dear Mr. DeVany**:·~.,** ·.·'**:;~** •• : f 

## }>

# ~~~~ --1:=!

## fi]§EJ~ .__t'j

Akutan is one ofseven communities that make up Aleutian Pribilof Island Community Development Association {APICDA). As such, its abilityto operate as a citywith all components being fully functional is critical to our mission. Due to the City's isolation, it requires daily air service forthe transport of residents, food, freight and mail. Further, air service is imperative to the survival ofthe community as water service is seldom the most efficient orsecure manner oftransportation. With Pen Air's announcement to discontinue service to Akutan, Grant Aviation's EAS proposal for air service to Akun Island is ofgreat significance and we encourage the U.S. Department ofTransportation to give the submission its full and immediate attention. APICDA fully supports Grant Aviation's proposal and is happy to be ofany assistance that would help to expedite its institution. Sincerely, "") I

Cc: Mr.Joe Bereskin, Mayor Mr. CJ Zane
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Re: Annual Statement ofCompliance for JPMBB Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2015-C32, CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C32

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of October 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
N OTE : This o rder is non precedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
ISAAC A. POTTER, JR.
, Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

ROBERTA S. BREN AND OBLON SPIVAK
, Defendants

- Appellees

,

AND

MICHELLE K. LEE, DEP UTY DIRECTOR, U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, AND LINDA M. KING, Defendants

- Appellees.

______________________

2014

- 1379

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in No. 1:13

- cv

- 01417

- CMH

IDD, Senior Judge Claude M. Hilton.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

P ER C URIAM

.

O R D E R Case: 14-1379 Document: 18 Page: 1 Filed: 05/06/2014POTTER v. BREN 2

Appellees respond to this court’s March 31, 2014 show cause order. Isaac A. Potter, Jr. moves for entry of jud gment, to disqualify appellees’ counsel , and for various other relief . Appellees respond.

Mr. Potter filed his action in the United States Di strict Court for t he Eastern District of Virginia, and it appears that his district court complaint challenges

, at least in part

, registration of the trademark KNIGHTS OF THE ZODIAC to registrant Toei Animation Co. Mr. Potter has previously filed an interlocutory appeal in the
same case to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth C ircuit. Mr. Potter’s current appeal appears to stem from the district court’s order granting certain defendants’ motions to dismiss and directing Mr. Potter to file an amended complaint.
This court is a court of limited jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. § 1295. U pon review, we conclude that the district court’s jurisdiction did not arise in whole or in part under the laws specified in § 1295 as defining this court’s appellate jurisdiction. This court therefore lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. We deem it the better course to transfer the matter to the Fourth Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631.
Accordingly,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT : This appeal and all pending motions are transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631.

F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

s30 Case: 14-1379 Document: 18 Page: 2 Filed: 05/06/2014
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Craftmade International, Inc. (the "Company"), does
hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003
(the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.


Date:  November 14, 2003                     /s/ James R. Ridings
                                        ---------------------------------
                                                 James R. Ridings
                                                 Chairman of the Board,
                                                 President and
                                                 Chief Executive Officer


     The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form
10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,
whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.
# Amtsblatt C 301A/12.

| | ISSN 1725-2407 |
| --- | --- |
| Amtsblatt
  der Europäischen Union | C 301A |
| | |
| Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache | Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen | 49. Jahrgang12. Dezember 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2407

Amtsblatt

der Europäischen Union

C 301A

Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache

Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen

49. Jahrgang12. Dezember 2006

---

| Informationsnummer | Inhalt | Seite |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Bekanntmachungen |
| | Kommission |
| 2006/C 301A/1 | Gemeinschaftliches Sortenamt — Aufforderung zur Bekundung des Interesses an der Ernennung zum/zur Vorsitzenden der Beschwerdekammer und zu dessen/deren Stellvertreter/in | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Inhalt

Seite

III   Bekanntmachungen

Kommission

2006/C 301A/1

Gemeinschaftliches Sortenamt — Aufforderung zur Bekundung des Interesses an der Ernennung zum/zur Vorsitzenden der Beschwerdekammer und zu dessen/deren Stellvertreter/in

1

| DE | |
| --- | --- |

DE

---

III Bekanntmachungen

Kommission

| 12.12.2006 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | CA 301/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2006

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

CA 301/1

---

GEMEINSCHAFTLICHES SORTENAMT

Aufforderung zur Bekundung des Interesses an der Ernennung zum/zur Vorsitzenden der Beschwerdekammer und zu dessen/deren Stellvertreter/in

(2006/C 301 A/01)

Das Gemeinschaftliche Sortenamt möchte den/die Vorsitzende(n) seiner Beschwerdekammer sowie dessen/deren Stellvertreter/in ernennen.

Die Bewerber und Bewerberinnen müssen die Staatsangehörigkeit eines der Mitgliedstaaten der Europäischen Union besitzen.

Der/die Vorsitzende des Amtes und der/die Stellvertreter/in werden aus einer Liste von Kandidaten und Kandidatinnen, die die Kommission nach Anhörung des Verwaltungsrates des Sortenamtes vorschlägt, vom Rat ernannt. Auskünfte über die Besoldung erteilt auf Anfrage das Sekretariat der Beschwerdekammer (Gemeinschaftliches Sortenamt, 3, boulevard Maréchal-Foch, BP 10121, F-49101 Angers Cedex 02). Das Gemeinschaftliche Sortenamt und die Kommission verfolgen eine Politik der Chancengleichheit.

Stellenbeschreibung, Bewerbungsformulare und Hinweise zur Einreichung der Bewerbungen sind im Internet unter folgender Adresse abrufbar:

http://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/propertyrights/index_en.htm

oder

http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm

Die Frist für die Einreichung von Bewerbungen endet am 31. Januar 2007 (Einzelheiten sind den vorgenannten Hinweisen zu entnehmen).

---
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.6852-1 Termination assessments of tax in the case of flagrant political expenditures of section 501(c)(3) organizations. ( a ) *Authority for making.* Any assessment under section 6852 as a result of a flagrant violation by a section 501(c)(3) organization of the prohibition against making political expenditures must be authorized by the District Director.
( b ) *Determination of income tax.* An organization shall be subject to an assessment of income tax under section 6852 only if the flagrant violation of the prohibition against making political expenditures results in revocation of the organization's tax exemption under section 501(a) because it is not described in section 501(c)(3). An organization subject to such an assessment is not liable for income taxes for any period prior to the effective date of the revocation of the organization's tax exemption.
( c ) *Payment.* Where a District Director has made a determination of income tax under paragraph (b) of this section or of section 4955 excise tax, notwithstanding any other provision of law, any tax will become immediately due and payable. The taxpayer is required to pay the amount of the assessment within 10 days after the District Director sends the notice and demand for immediate payment regardless of the filing of an administrative appeal or of a court petition. Regardless of filing an administrative appeal or of petitioning a court, enforced collection action may proceed after the 10-day payment period unless the taxpayer posts the bond described in section 6863. For purposes of collection procedures such as section 6331 (regarding levy), assessments under the authority of paragraph (a) of this section do not constitute situations in which the collection of such tax is in jeopardy and, therefore, do not suspend normal collection procedures.
( d ) *Effective date.* This section is effective December 5, 1995.
[T.D. 8628, 60 FR 62212, Dec. 5, 1995] jeopardy assessments
§ 20.2053-5 Deductions for charitable, etc., pledges or subscriptions. ( a ) A pledge or a subscription, evidenced by a promissory note or otherwise, even though enforceable against the estate, is deductible (subject to any applicable limitations in § 20.2053-1) only to the extent that— ( 1 ) Liability therefor was contracted bona fide and for an adequate and full consideration in cash or its equivalent, or
( 2 ) It would have constituted an allowable deduction under section 2055 (relating to charitable, etc., deductions) if it had been a bequest.
( b ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section applies to the estates of decedents dying on or after October 20, 2009.
[T.D. 6296, 23 FR 4529, June 24, 1958, as amended at T.D. 9468, 74 FR 53664, Oct. 20, 2009]
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 241

To amend rule XVI of the Standing Rules of the Senate relating to

amendments to appropriation bills in the Senate.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 13 (legislative day, JULY 11), 1994

Mr. BYRD submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Rules and Administration

RESOLUTION

To amend rule XVI of the Standing Rules of the Senate

relating to amendments to appropriation bills in the Senate.

1 Resolved, That paragraph 4 of rule XVI of the Stand2 ing Rules of the Senate is amended by—

3 (1) inserting ‘‘as passed by the House or as re4 ported to the Senate,’’ after ‘‘contained in the bill’’;

5 (2) striking ‘‘relevancy of amendments under

6 this rule’’ and inserting ‘‘relevancy or germaneness

7 of amendments under this paragraph’’;

8 (3) striking ‘‘submitted to the Senate and be

9 decided without debate’’ and inserting ‘‘ruled on by

10 the chair’’;
2

•SRES 241 IS

1 (4) inserting ‘‘(a)’’ after ‘‘4.’’; and

2 (5) adding at the end thereof the following:

3 ‘‘(b)(1) An affirmative vote of three-fifths of the Sen4 ators, duly chosen and sworn, shall be required to overturn

5 a ruling of the Chair regarding questions of germaneness,

6 relevancy, or legislation under this paragraph.

7 ‘‘(2) This paragraph may be waived with respect to

8 an amendment by the affirmative vote of three-fifths of

9 the Senators, duly chosen and sworn.’’.

Æ