alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                    OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Fredric L. Holliger, Chief Executive Officer of Giant Industries, Inc.
("Giant"), do hereby certify that: (a) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
of Giant for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 (the "Form 10-Q")
to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, and (b) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Giant.

Giant Industries, Inc.


By: /S/ FREDRIC L. HOLLIGER
-----------------------------------
Name:   Fredric L. Holliger
Title:  Chief Executive Officer

Date:   November 13, 2002.
----

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 26 October 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Centrale Raad van Beroep — Netherlands) — K. Tas-Hagen, R.A. Tas v Raadskamer WUBO van de Pensioen- en Uitkeringsraad

(Case C-192/05) (1)

(Benefit awarded to civilian war victims by a Member State - Condition of residence in the territory of that State at the time when the application for the benefit is submitted - Article 18(1) EC)

(2006/C 326/21)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Centrale Raad van Beroep

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: K. Tas-Hagen, R.A. Tas

Defendant: Raadskamer WUBO van de Pensioen- en Uitkeringsraad

Re:

Preliminary ruling — Centrale Raad van Beroep — Grant of a benefit by a Member State to civilian war victims — Benefit reserved for nationals of the Member State in question who are resident in that Member State at the time when the application is submitted — Whether compatible with Article 18 EC

Operative part of the judgment

Article 18(1) EC must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State under which it refuses to grant to one of its nationals a benefit for civilian war victims solely on the ground that, at the time at which the application was submitted, the person concerned was resident, not in the territory of that Member State, but in the territory of another Member State.

----

(1)OJ C 182, 23. 7. 2005.

----
H. Con. Res. 82 Agreed to July 13, 1995

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the fourth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-five

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill (S. 523) to amend the

Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Act to authorize additional

measures to carry out the control of salinity upstream of Imperial

Dam in a cost-effective manner, and for other purposes, the Secretary of the Senate shall make the following corrections:

(1) In the last sentence of paragraph (1) of section 1 of

the bill (adding a new paragraph (6) to section 202(a) of the

Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Act) insert a period after

the words ‘‘submits such report’’.

(2) In paragraph (2)(B) of section 1 of the bill (amending

section 205(a)(4)(i) of the Colorado River Basin Salinity Control

Act) strike ‘‘section 202(a)(4) and (5)’’ and insert ‘‘sections 202(a)

(4) and (5)’’.

(3) At the end of paragraph (4) of section 1 of the bill

(amending section 202(b)(4) of the Colorado River Basin Salinity

Control Act) strike the period before the closing quotation

marks.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
DESCRIPTION OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION



 Exhibit 10.13 
  
 Description of Non-Employee Director Compensation 
  
 Each non-employee director of Markel Corporation (“Company”) receives for services as director an annual fee of
$30,000, plus reimbursement of expenses incurred in connection with attending meetings and training sessions attended at the Company’s request. The Company also matches up to $5,000 per year in charitable contributions made by each non-employee
director. 
  
 Each non-employee director other than Lemuel Lewis
previously received a one-time award of 1,000 Restricted Stock Units under the Company’s Omnibus Incentive Plan. Such awards vest ratably over a five-year period from the date of grant, although no shares will be issued until the end of five
years. When Mr. Lewis joined the Board in February 2007, he received a one-time award of 250 Restricted Stock Units vesting in May 2008. 
  
 Non-employee directors are also eligible to participate, up to the total amount of fees received by the director, in the Company’s Employee Stock
Purchase and Bonus Plan (“Stock Plan”). Under the Stock Plan, amounts specified by a director are withheld from that director’s fees and forwarded to an independent administrator who purchases shares of the Company’s Common Stock
on behalf of the director participant. In addition, the Company provides a “bonus” of 10% of the net increase in shares owned under the Stock Plan in a calendar year. 
  
 The Company offers loans to participants to facilitate the purchase of shares under the Stock Plan. As required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, directors may no longer receive new loans under the Stock Plan. Existing loans to directors continue in accordance with their terms in effect on July 30, 2002. In connection with the “grandfathered” loans for
directors, the Company provides an incentive payment based on a five-year compound annual growth in book value, calculated in accordance with the terms of the Stock Plan, as follows: 
  

			
	 5-Year Average Compound
 Annual Growth in Book Value

	  	 Company Incentive Payment
 as % of Original Loan Balance


	  
	 Under 15%
	  	    0%
	             15%
	  	1.25%
	             16%
	  	  2.0%
	             17%
	  	2.75%
	             18%
	  	  3.5%
	             19%
	  	4.25%
	             20%
	  	    5%
	             21%
	  	5.75%
	             22%
	  	  6.5%
	             23%
	  	7.25%
	             24%
	  	  8.0%
	             25%
	  	8.75%
	    Over 25%
	  	Discretionary
§ 25.6109-1 Tax return preparers furnishing identifying numbers for returns or claims for refund. ( a ) *In general.* Each gift tax return or claim for refund prepared by one or more signing tax return preparers must include the identifying number of the preparer required by § 1.6695-1(b) of this chapter to sign the return or claim for refund in the manner stated in § 1.6109-2 of this chapter.
( b ) *Effective/applicability date.* Paragraph (a) of this section is applicable to returns and claims for refund filed after December 31, 2008.
[T.D. 9436, 73 FR 78451, Dec. 22, 2008]
10

10

10

10

20

10

10

20

20

10

10

10

10

20

10

10

10

30

10

20

20

10

10

10

10

20

10

10

40

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

20

10

10

10

10

10

10

20

10

10

10

10

10 10

10

10

20

10

10

20

20

20

10

10

10

10

10

20

20

20

10

10

10

10

20

20

10

10

10

10

20

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

20

10

30

10

10

10

10

10

10

20

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

20

10

10

10

10

20

10

10

20

20

10

10

20

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

30

20

10

10

10

10

10

20

10

20

10

20

10

20

10

10

10

10

LAGUNA

MADRE

OldTajos

Ranch Mesquite

Rincon

Calabazas

Islands

Tres

Marias

Saltillo

Well

Potrero

Cortado

Potrero

Lopeno SW

La Parra

Ranch SW

Potrero

Lopeno NW

Los Amigos

Windmill

San

Pedro

Ranch

La Parra

Ranch SE

Maria

Estella

Well

FEET

FEET

1 270 000 FEET

97°30'

30"

37'

26°

55'

97° 35' 97°

00'

30"

35' 30"

52'

27°

37'

27°

97°

26°

55'

30" 52'

30"

57'

00'

57'30"

32'

32' 30'

30"

30"

16 880 000

1 300 000 FEET

16 850000

E

29

6

6

29

6

000m

29

29

000m 6

29

29

29

6

6

6

29

29

29

6

6

6

29

6

29

29

29

6 6

29

29

29

29

6

000m

29

29

6

6

29

6

29

6

29

6

29

29

6 6 000m

86

86

E 39

N

80

41

83

46

74

38

84

43

40 47

83

81

77

43

84

37

41

76

45 47

44

74

42

82

48

87 N

87

38

79

85

82

76

79

77

44

42 48

40

85

80

39

81

75

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

TEXAS

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

TX 2697-344

MARIA ESTELLA WELL, TX

2010

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Interstate Route US Route State Route

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

MARIA ESTELLA WELL QUADRANGLE

TEXAS

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Zone 14R

Imagery......................................................NAIP, April 2008

Roads.....................................US Census Bureau TIGER data

with limited USGS updates, 2008

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2008

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 1995

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2009

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator,

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Texas Coordinate System of 1983

(south zone)

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is also draft version 0.5.10

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0 1

MILES

MN

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

GN

UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 39 ́

12 MILS

4° 42 ́

84 MILS

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

14R

PQ

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988
**Exhibit 32**
     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each ofthe undersigned officers of Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc. (the“Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:
     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004(the “Form 10-Q”), of the Company fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and informationcontained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Dated: November 5, 2004        /s/ William J. Doyle   William J. Doyle    *President and Chief Executive Officer*   
Dated: November 5, 2004        /s/ Wayne R. Brownlee   Wayne R. Brownlee    *Senior Vice President, Treasurer, and ChiefFinancial Officer*   
     The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form10-Q pursuant to Item 601(6)(32) of Regulation S-K, section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as partof the Form 10-Q.
3
RULE 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I, Blaise B. Bettendorf, certify that:
 I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Summit Financial Corporation;Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent calendar quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
 Date: July 28, 2004Blaise B. Bettendorf, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Charles LLEWYLN, a/k/a Owen Oddman, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bobby Lee MEDFORD, Sheriff, Buncombe County; Lieutenant Evans, Facility Administration, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-8073.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 13, 2002.

Decided June 18, 2002.

Charles Llewyln, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Charles Llewyln appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion to reconsider its denial of relief under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001).* We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Llewyln v. Medford,*No. CA-01-54-MU (W.D.N.C. Jan. 29, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*

*

To the extent Appellant seeks to appeal the Court’s order denying § 1983 relief, his December 10, 2001 notice of appeal is untimely as to that order, which was entered on the court’s docket on July 30, 2001. Appellant never sought an extension of time in which to appeal or reopening of the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5) or (a)(6). We have construed Appellant’s informal brief filed in this Court as a timely notice of appeal from the denial of reconsideration. *See Smith v. Barry,*502 U.S. 244, 248, 112 S.Ct. 678, 116 L.Ed.2d 678 (1992).
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 180 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 180

Commending the Americans who served the United States during the period 
                         known as the Cold War.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 22, 1996

 Mr. Lazio of New York (for himself, Mr. DeLay, Mr. Spence, Mr. Stump, 
 and Mr. Parker) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which 
was referred to the Committee on National Security, and in addition to 
the Committees on International Relations, and Intelligence (Permanent 
Select), for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Commending the Americans who served the United States during the period 
                         known as the Cold War.

Whereas the most dangerous military competition in the history of mankind has 
        come to a close without a nuclear holocaust;
Whereas men and women in the armed forces, intelligence community, and foreign 
        service community of the United States faithfully performed their duties 
        during the period known as the Cold War;
Whereas many of these persons were isolated from family and friends and served 
        under arduous conditions in far away lands in order to preserve peace 
        and harmony throughout the world;
Whereas these persons performed their duty in the most successful, extended, 
        military competition in the history of mankind and ensured that weapons 
        of mass destruction, capable of destroying all humanity, were never 
        released;
Whereas the self-discipline and dedication of these persons were fundamental to 
        the prevention of a Super Power conflict; and
Whereas the silent determination of these persons brought a peaceful victory to 
        all the people of the world: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress acknowledges the service and sacrifices of these 
Americans who contributed to historic victory in the Cold War.
                                 <all>
```
RIGHTS OF THE VENDEE UNDER A RESCINDED CONTRACT.

Circuit Court of Cuyahoga County.

#### Catherine Galagher v. Samuel E. Dettelbach.

Decided, 1902.

*Quasi Contract*— Vendee *May Recover Purchase Money Paid Under a Voidable Contract.*

Where a vendor elects to rescind a contract which is voidable under the statute of frauds, the vendee may maintain an action to recover from the vendor any purchase money which he may have paid under the contract without alleging that he himself is ready and willing to perform.

*James F. Walslv,*for plaintiff in error.

*Carpenter & Yoxmg,*contra.

Hale, J.; Caldwell, J., and Marvin, J., concur.

The court of common pleas sustained a general demurrer to the petition and gave judgment for the defendant.

It is alleged in the petition that the defendant, on the 23d day of October, 1897, entered into a verbal contract with the plaintiff by the terms of which the defendant sold and agreed to convey to the plaintiff for the consideration of $2,475 certain described real estate, and that on said day the plaintiff paid to the defendant, on the agreed purchase price, the sum of $300. That the defendant elected to rescind said verbal contract, and, on the 6th day of April, 1898, conveyed said real estate to another and refuses to repay to the plaintiff said sum of $300.

This petition, we hold, states a cause of action.

One who has entered into a verbal contract for the purchase of real estate, voidable under the statute of frauds, and paid a portion of the purchase price, may not himself elect to rescind the contract, refuse to perform the agreement on his part, and by action recover the amount paid by him, the vendor making no default.

If, however, the vendor elects to rescind the contract or refuses performance on his part, and puts it beyond his power *348to convey the real estate in accordance with the terms of the verbal agreement, the purchaser may recover the money paid.

It being alleged that the defendant elected to rescind the contract, and conveyed the premises to another, it was unnecessary, to constitute a good cause of action, that the petition should contain the further allegation that the plaintiff had performed, or offered to perform, the contract on his part.

If the defendant has received from the plaintiff money upon a contract voidable at his election and has elected to avoid the contract, he should refund the money so received.

The judgment of the court of common pleas is reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
#### § 20.6061-1 Signing of returns and other documents.

Any return, statement, or other document required to be made under any provision of Chapter 11 or Subtitle F of the Code or regulations prescribed thereunder with respect to any tax imposed by Chapter 11 of the Code shall be signed by the executor, administrator or other person required or duly authorized to sign in accordance with the regulations, forms or instructions prescribed with respect to such return, statement, or other document. See section 2203 for definition of executor, administrator, etc. The person required or duly authorized to make the return may incur liability for the penalties provided for erroneous, false, or fraudulent returns. For criminal penalties see sections 7201, 7203, 7206, 7207, and 7269.

[T.D. 6600, 27 FR 4986, May 29, 1962]
Exhibit
10.18


CF
Industries Holdings, Inc.

Non-employee Director

Compensation Policy


The following sets forth the compensation for
non-employee members of the Board of Directors of CF Industries Holdings, Inc.:


Annual Cash Retainer


Each non-employee director will receive, upon joining
the Board, a cash retainer of $40,000, payable in advance.  Thereafter, each continuing non-employee
director will receive an annual cash retainer of $40,000, payable in advance on
the date of each annual meeting of the stockholders. The Chairman of the Audit
Committee and the Lead Independent Director will also receive an additional
annual cash retainer of $10,000 which shall be paid in the same manner.


Annual Restricted Stock Grant


Each non-employee director will receive, upon joining
the Board, a restricted stock grant with a fair market value of $65,000.  Thereafter, each continuing non-employee
director will receive an annual restricted stock grant with a fair market value
of $65,000 on the date of each annual meeting of the stockholders.  Assuming continuing service as a non-employee
director, all shares of restricted stock will vest on the earlier of
(x) the date of the first annual meeting of the stockholders following the
date of grant or (y) the first anniversary of the date of grant.


Meeting Fees


Each director will receive $1,500 for each Board
meeting attended in person (or $500 per meeting for participation via
conference call).  During a typical
calendar year, there would be seven regularly scheduled Board meetings (six in
person and one telephonic).  There may
also be one or more special Board meetings.


Each Board committee member will receive $1,250 for
each committee meeting attended in 
person (or $425 per meeting for participation via conference call).  During a typical calendar year, there would
be (i) six regularly scheduled Audit Committee meetings (five in person
and one telephonic); (ii) six regularly scheduled Compensation Committee
meetings (five in person and one telephonic); and (iii) three regularly
scheduled Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee meetings (all in
person).  There may also be one or more
special committee meetings.


Stock Ownership Guidelines


Non-employee directors will have a period of five
years in which to achieve stock ownership with a market value equal to five
times their annual cash retainer.