alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States 

Department of 

Agriculture

Forest 

Service 

Black Hills 

National 

Forest 

Mystic Ranger District 

8221 South Highway 16 

Rapid City, SD 57702 

Phone 605-343-1567 Fax 605-343-7134

 Caring for the Land and Serving People Printed on Recycled Paper

File Code: 1950-Pactola Project Area 

Date: November 17, 2011 

Greetings from the Black Hills National Forest: 

On November 17, 2011, I approved the Pactola Project Record of Decision. The project area lies 

approximately 10 miles west of Rapid City, South Dakota and encompasses approximately 26,017 

acres. The project area consists of 24,863 acres of National Forest System lands and 1,154 acres 

of interspersed private lands. 

The project’s main focus is to reduce the threat to forest resources from the existing mountain pine 

beetle infestation and to reduce hazardous fuels in order to minimize the potential for large-scale 

wildfire. The Healthy Forest Restoration Act (HFRA) of 2003 (P.L.108-148) provides expedited 

processes for projects focused on reducing insect infestations and wildfire hazards on National 

Forest System lands. 

The Record of Decision (ROD) documents my decision and rationale for the decision. Resource 

management actions authorized by my decision apply only to National Forest System (NFS) lands 

and do not include private lands. This decision was made following completion of the pre-decisional 

objection process, pursuant to Forest Service regulations at 36 CFR 218, Subpart A. Information 

regarding this process is contained in the ROD. 

Additional copies of the Pactola Project Area ROD or copies of the Pactola Project Final 

Environmental Impact Statement can be obtained at the Mystic Ranger District Office in Rapid City, 

South Dakota or at the Black Hills National Forest Office in Custer, South Dakota. The documents 

are also available on the BHNF web site at http://go.usa.gov/Bh1. 

For further information, contact me or Jessica Eggers at the Mystic Ranger District Office in Rapid 

City, South Dakota at 605-343-1567. 

Sincerely, 

/s/Jacqueline Groce 

JACQUELINE GROCE 

Acting District Ranger 

Enclosure: Pactola Project Area Record of Decision
----

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2006/C 296/04)

2.   Procedure

Community producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.

Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Community producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Community producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Division B-1), J-79 5/16, B-1049 Brussels (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

----

(1)OJ L 56, 6.3.1996, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 2117/2005 (OJ L 340, 23.12.2005, p. 17).

(2)  Telefax : (32-2) 295 65 05.

----
Motion Granted; Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 4, 2012.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 12

- 01045

- CV

HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS , Appellant

V.

RUFUS CHERRY , Appellee

On Appeal from the 157th District Court

Harris County, Texas T rial Court Cause No. 2010

- 09746



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
This is an appeal from a n interlocutory order signed November 2 , 201 2 . On
November 26 , 2012, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.
42.1. The motion is granted.
Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Seymore, Boyce, and McCally.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as Amended





Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted), Bing Yeh, the President and Chief Executive
Officer of Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies
that, to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2004, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the "Periodic
Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the
5th day of August, 2004.





/s/ Bing Yeh Bing Yeh 
President and Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, has been provided to Silicon
Storage Technology, Inc. and will be retained by Silicon Storage Technology,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not
deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.17

                       FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE GROUP, INC.
                           2005 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN

                          NOTICE OF STOCK OPTION GRANT

        You (the "Optionee") have been granted the following option to purchase
Class A Common Stock of Fidelity National Title Group, Inc. (the "Company"), par
value $0.0001 per share ("Share"), pursuant to the Fidelity National Title
Group, Inc. 2005 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the "FNT Plan") according to the
attached Personnel Grant Sheet ("PGS") incorporated herein by reference:

<Table>
<S>                                            <C>
---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------
Name of Optionee:

---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------
Total Number of Shares Subject to Option:      As shown on attached PGS Sheet

---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------
Type of Option:                                Nonqualified

---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------
Exercise Price Per Share:                      As shown on attached PGS Sheet

---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------
Effective Date of Grant:                       As shown on attached PGS Sheet

---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------
</Table>

By your signature below, you and the Company agree and acknowledge that this
option is granted under and governed by the terms and conditions of the FNT Plan
and the Stock Option Agreement, which are incorporated herein by reference, and
that you have been provided a copy of the FNT Plan and the Stock Option
Agreement. In the event of any conflict between the terms of the plan under
which your option was originally granted and the FNT Plan, the provisions of the
FNT Plan shall govern.

OPTIONEE:



----------------------------------
Date:
     -----------------------------
Address:
        --------------------------

        --------------------------
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 By Notice dated August 28, 2009, and published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     on September 8, 2009, (74 FR 46231), Cody Laboratories, 601 Yellowstone Avenue, Cody, Wyoming 82414, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed in schedules I and II: Drug
ScheduleDihydromorphine (9145)
IAmphetamine (1100)
IIMethamphetamine (1105)
IIAmobarbital (2125)
IIPentobarbital (2270)
IISecobarbital (2315)
IIPhenylacetone (8501)
IICocaine (9041)
IICodeine (9050)
IIDihydrocodeine (9120)
IIOxycodone (9143)
IIHydromorphone (9150)
IIDiphenoxylate (9170)
IIEcgonine (9180)
IIHydrocodone (9193)
IIMeperidine (9230)
IIMethadone (9250)
IIMorphine (9300)
IIOxymorphone (9652)
IIAlfentanil (9737)
IIRemifentanil (9739)
IISufentanil (9740)
IIFentanyl (9801)
II
 The company plans on manufacturing the listed controlled substances in bulk for sale to its customers. No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of Cody Laboratories to manufacture the listed basic classes of controlled substances is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has investigated Cody Laboratories to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823, and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed. Dated: January 6, 2010. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 2010-511 Filed 1-12-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
November 9, 2010

RE: Docket No. FAA

- 2010

- 0832 The Air Transport Association of America, Inc., the National Air Carrier Association and the Regional Airline Association hereby withdraw their requ est for a limited exemption from 14 C.F.R. § 121 .803(c)(3), s ubmitted on August 10, 2010. The shortage of e pinephrine 1:10,000, 2 cc, injectable, (single dose ampule or equivalent) and d extrose, 50%/50 cc injectable, (single dose ampule or equivalent) , which gave rise to the petition, have been resolved and there fore the exemption is no longer needed. We appreciate your attention to this matter.

Katherine B. Andrus Air Transport Association of America, Inc.
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alpha Energy, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Karen Ziegler, Principal Executive Officer and Michael D. Davis Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: August 19, 2015   /s/ Karen Ziegler /s/ Michael D. Davis Karen Ziegler Michael D. Davis Principal Financial Officer Principal Executive Officer
Amendment No. 1 to the Mission Resources Corporation 1996 Stock Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.45 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE MISSION RESOURCES CORPORATION 1996 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 
 Section 6.10.
of the Mission Resources Corporation 1996 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following language: 
 “In the event of any change in the outstanding Common Stock by reason of a stock dividend or distribution, recapitalization, merger, consolidation, split-up, combination, exchange of shares or the like, the Plan
Administrator shall proportionately adjust the number of shares of Common Stock which may be issued under the Plan, the number of shares of Common Stock subject to options or Performance Shares theretofore granted under the Plan, and any and all
other matters deemed appropriate by the Plan Administrator.” 
 This Amendment No. 1 to the Plan is effective this 7th day of
November, 2006. 
  

			
	Petrohawk Energy Corporation
		
	By:	 	/s/ Floyd C. Wilson
	Name:	 	    Floyd C. Wilson
	Title:	 	    President and Chief Executive Officer
#### § 1.665(b)-3 Exclusions under section 663(a)(1).

Subpart D (section 665 and following), part I, subchapter J, chapter 1 of the Code, has no application to an amount which qualifies as an exclusion under section 663(a)(1), relating to gifts, bequests, etc.
#### Anthony Grebloski, Jr., et al. *v.*Henry Faux

King, C. J., Murphy, Alcorn, House and Bogdanski, Js.

Argued April 8

decided April 28, 1964

*Lawrence B. Schwarts,*for the appellants (plaintiffs).

*Ronald D. Williams,*with whom was *William B. Rush,*for the appellee (defendant).

*713Per Curiam.

The plaintiffs are father and son. The defendant was the operator of an automobile which, about 1 a.m. on the morning of January 6, 1962, struek the rear of the father’s car, then being operated by the son, as it was pulling away from a stop sign at which it had stopped. The son sought recovery for alleged injuries, and the father for damage to the left rear of the car. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant which the court refused to set aside, and the plaintiffs have appealed.

The plaintiffs are not entitled to any corrections in the claims of proof in the finding. The jury could find that visibility was poor due to fog and rain, that the road was slippery, that the defendant had slowed his car from a speed of twenty miles an hour because he knew of the stop sign, that the fog was heavy at this point, and that the defendant applied his brakes when he saw the unlighted rear of the plaintiffs’ car but was unable to prevent his car from sliding on the icy road into the plaintiffs’ car. The injuries which the son claimed to have sustained were the same as the injuries which he had suffered in another accident, two and a half months before, and from which he had not recovered. The court was not in error in denying the motion to set aside the verdict.

The plaintiffs have not established reversible error in the charge. The charge on the burden of proving contributory negligence at least met the minimum suggestions in *Marley*v. *New England Transportation Co.,*133 Conn. 586, 590, 53 A.2d 296, and it was not necessary specifically to refer to the statute on the subject. *Voronelis*v. *White Line Bus Corporation,*123 Conn. 25, 28, 192 A. 265. The plaintiffs excepted to the charge on sudden *714emergency because it had not been pleaded as a special defense. It need not be. *Pareles*v. *McCarthy,*149 Conn. 238, 243, 178 A.2d 155. The other claims of error in the charge were not properly raised in the trial and will not be considered. The other assignments of error have no merit.

There is no error.
#### § 1.908 [Reserved]
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE:

SHANNON MARK DOUTHIT,

Relator.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-24-00008-CR

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING 

IN MANDAMUS

OPINION

Relator Shannon Mark Douthit, a pro se inmate, filed a petition for writ of mandamus 

asking this Court to compel the Honorable Roy Ferguson, District Judge of the 394th Judicial 

District Court to rule on his motion for post-conviction DNA testing pursuant to Article 64 of the 

Code of Criminal Procedure. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 64.03. For the reasons below, we 

deny the petition as moot. 

Douthit filed his motion for DNA testing on August 29, 2023. He called the motion to the 

trial court’s attention on December 6, 2023, when he filed a request for a hearing on the motion. 

He filed this mandamus on January 22, 2024. 

On April 17, 2024, the district clerk filed a supplemental clerk’s record that includes an 

order of the trial court dated January 23, 2024. The order takes action on Douthit’s motion by 
ordering the State to deliver the evidence at issue to the trial court, file a response, and appoint 

counsel for Douthit. The trial court’s ruling on Douthit’s pending motion renders moot his petition 

for mandamus seeking the same. See In re Bonilla, 424 S.W.3d 528, 534 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014)

(orig. proceeding) (concluding that mandamus relief is rendered moot when relator received the 

relief requested by other means). Therefore, we deny the petition as moot. 

JEFF ALLEY, Chief Justice

April 22, 2024

Before Alley, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.
§ 1.988-1T Certain definitions and special rules (temporary). ( a ) ( 1 ) through(a)
( 2 ) [Reserved] For further guidance, see § 1.988-1(a)(1) through (2).
( 3 ) *Specified owner functional currency transactions of a section 987 QBU not treated as section 988 transactions.* Specified owner functional currency transactions, as defined in § 1.987-3T(b)(4)(ii), held by a section 987 QBU are not treated as section 988 transactions. Thus, no currency gain or loss shall be recognized by a section 987 QBU under section 988 with respect to such transactions.
( 4 ) through(i) [Reserved] For further guidance, see § 1.988-1(a)(4) through (i).
(j) *Effective/applicability date.* This section applies to taxable years beginning on or after one year after the first day of the first taxable year following December 7, 2016. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, if a taxpayer makes an election under § 1.987-11(b), then this section applies to taxable years to which §§ 1.987-1 through 1.987-10 apply as a result of such election. (k) *Expiration date.* The applicability of this section expires on December 6, 2019. [T.D. 9795, 81 FR 88879, Dec. 8, 2016]
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 150 (Thursday, August 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 39379]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18784]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 5 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, Oklahoma, and 
Texas)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 5 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, 
ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, September 8, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia Robb at 1-888-912-1227 or 
414-231-2360.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Area 5 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Tuesday, September 8, 2009, at 9:30 a.m. Central Time via telephone 
conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, 
notification of intent to participate must be made with Patricia Robb. 
For more information please contact Ms. Robb at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-
231-2360, or write TAP Office Stop 1006MIL, 211 West Wisconsin Avenue, 
Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221, or post comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: July 30, 2009.
Shawn F. Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E9-18784 Filed 8-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
##### 



Exhibit 32 Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc. (the
Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that: The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the
Form 10-Q), of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:   August
5, 2004 /s/ William J. DoyleWilliam J. DoylePresident and Chief Executive Officer Dated:   August
5, 2004 /s/ Wayne R. BrownleeWayne R. BrownleeSenior Vice President, Treasurer, andChief Financial Officer The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form
10-Q pursuant to Item 601(6)(32) of Regulation S-K, section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part
of the Form 10-Q.