alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# i1iiiti.' rc: )(

%OO' August 8, 2012

Administrator Lisa Jackson U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Room 300, Ariel Rios Building 1200 Pennsylvania A y e, NW Washington, DC 20460

Dear Administrator Jackson,

I am writing today to ask that you immediately consider using your existing waiver authority to adjust the corn-ethanol mandate for the Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS) to reflect the impact the mandate is having on increasing food and feed costs. Additionally, I would urge you to take into consideration that impact as you decide on the volumetric requirements for the RFS for the 2013.

According to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), drought conditions and a "rapid decline in crop conditions" since early June have caused the USDA to reduce the projected U.S. corn yield by 20 bushels per acre in its latest forecast, TheUSDA also reported that the 50 percent of the nation's corn crop was rated as poor-tovery-poor earlier this week. Last month, similar forecasts pushed U.S. corn prices to record levels, and the price remains exceptionally high today.

The use of corn to meet the requirements of the RFS is contributing to higher prices because a substantial amount of our nation's food crop is diverted to make fuel. With approximately 40 percent of our nation's corn crop diverted from the normal food supply chain to make fuel, feed and food prices are skyrocketing to unacceptable levels for producers and working families.

All of these factors make it essential for you to use the authority given to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to waive all or portions of the RFS if there is inadequate supply to meet the mandate or when such a waiver will prevent economic harm to the country, a region, or a state. When you combine the USDA's projections for food price inflation at levels significantly higher than normal economic inflation with the already struggling economy, families and businesses will continue to struggle if you do not grant this waiver.

I look forward to your prompt consideration of this request and hope that you will agree that an immediate adjustment of the corn-ethanol mandate is necessary.

Michael B. Enzi United States Senate
§ 1.986(c)-1 Coordination with section 965. ( a ) *Amount of foreign currency gain or loss.* Foreign currency gain or loss with respect to distributions of section 965(a) previously taxed earnings and profits (as defined in § 1.965-1(f)(39)) is determined based on movements in the exchange rate between December 31, 2017, and the time such distributions are made.
( b ) *Section 965(a) previously taxed earnings and profits.* Any gain or loss recognized under section 986(c) with respect to distributions of section 965(a) previously taxed earnings and profits is reduced in the same proportion as the reduction by a section 965(c) deduction amount (as defined in § 1.965-1(f)(42)) of the section 965(a) inclusion amount (as defined in § 1.965-1(f)(38)) that gave rise to such section 965(a) previously taxed earnings and profits.
( c ) *Section 965(b) previously taxed earnings and profits.* Section 986(c) does not apply with respect to distributions of section 965(b) previously taxed earnings and profits (as defined in § 1.965-1(f)(40)).
( d ) *Applicability dates.* The section applies beginning the last taxable year of a foreign corporation that begins before January 1, 2018, and with respect to a United States person, for the taxable year in which or with which such taxable year of the foreign corporation ends.
[T.D. 9846, 84 FR 1915, Feb. 5, 2019]
MARYBETH M. NELSON 

Attorney at Law 

March 12, 2015 

Court of Appeals 

First District 

301 Fannin Street 

Houston, Texas 77002 

830 Apollo Lane • Houston, Texas 77058 

office: 409.684.3067 • fax:817-533-1131 

1830 Hwy. 87 • Crystal Beach, Texas 77650 

marybethmnelson@yahoo.com 

RE: 01-15-00199-CV; Correction of email address for attorney for appellee, Marybeth M. 

Nelson. 

Dear Assistant Clerk: 

I noted on appellant's docketing statement that my email address was incorrectly noted. The 

correct email is marvbethmnelson@yahoo.com. All else appears correctly. I appreciate your time and 

effort in this regard. 

Sincerely, 

~M7f;fi Marybeth M. Nelson 

Attorney for Appellee, Jimmy Brill Cox 

Cc: Wilfried P. Schmitz 

-M9YMACCEPTED

01-15-00199-CV

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

3/12/2015 3:18:43 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 3/12/2015 3:18:43 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
EX-10.6






EXHIBIT 10.6




AMENDMENT NO. 2

TO

AMENDED AND RESTATED

CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT




THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 (“Amendment No. 2”) to the Amended and Restated Change in Control
Agreement referred to herein below, dated as of February 26, 2007, by and between eFunds
Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”) and Paul F. Walsh (the “Executive”),
recites and provides as follows:



RECITALS




WHEREAS, Executive entered into an Amended and Restated Change in Control Agreement with the
Corporation on November 3, 2004 and an Amendment No. 1 to that Agreement as of December 4, 2006
(such agreement, as amended, referred to herein as the “Change in Control Agreement”); and



WHEREAS, pursuant to this Amendment No. 2 the parties wish to amend the Change in Control
Agreement as provided below;



NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements hereinafter set forth and for other
good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the
Company and the Recipient agree as follows:



AGREEMENT




1. Amendment. (a) The definition of “Business Combination Period” in Section I of the
Change in Control Agreement is hereby amended to (i) delete the words “fifth anniversary” appearing
therein and to substitute the words “sixth anniversary” therefor and (ii) delete the words “three
years” appearing therein and to substitute the words “six years” therefor.



(b) Section II of the Change in Control Agreement is hereby amended to delete the words
“fifth anniversary” appearing therein and to substitute the words “sixth anniversary” therefor.



2. Definitions. Capitalized terms used and not defined in this Amendment No. 2 shall
have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Change in Control Agreement.



3. Continuing Effect of Change in Control Agreement. Except as expressly provided
herein to the contrary, the Change in Control Agreement shall remain unaffected and shall continue
in full force and effect after the date hereof.



4. References to Change in Control Agreement. From and after the execution and
delivery of this Amendment No. 2, all references to the Change in Control Agreement in the Change
in Control Agreement or any other document executed or delivered in connection therewith shall be
deemed a reference to the Change in Control Agreement as amended hereby, unless the context
expressly requires otherwise.



5. Counterparts. This Amendment No. 2 may be executed by one or more of the



parties to this Amendment on any number of separate counterparts (including counterparts delivered
by telecopy), and all of said counterparts taken together shall be deemed to constitute one and the
same instrument. Any such counterpart delivered by telecopy shall be effective as an original for
all purposes.



6. Governing Law. This Amendment No. 2 shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without reference to principles of conflict of
laws.



EFUNDS CORPORATION



By:/s/ Laura DeCespedes

Name: Laura DeCespedes

Title: EVP, Human Resources




PAUL F. WALSH



By: /s/ Paul F. Walsh

Name:

Title:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AGELLAN
TECHNOLOGY, INC. JUNE 30, 1997 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          51,228
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               155,043
<PP&E>                                          95,849
<DEPRECIATION>                                (14,447)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,666,820
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,061,235
<BONDS>                                      1,398,291
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,724
<OTHER-SE>                                      76,357
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,666,820
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  766,144
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                91,521
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              45,925
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (857,665)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (857,665)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (857,665)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)
        

</TABLE>
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4451 — Alcatel/Nortel Networks)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/C 306/06)

On 7 December 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 41 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.41
                                        Agreed to March 16, 1995        

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
  the fourth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-five

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on Thursday, March 16, 1995, it stand 
adjourned until 12:30 p.m. on Tuesday, March 21, 1995.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
§ 15.1-2 Revocation of election to deduct. ( a ) *Manner of revoking election.* A taxpayer may revoke an election made by him under section 615(e) or section 617(a) by filing with the internal revenue officer with whom the taxpayer's income tax return is required to be filed, within the periods set forth in paragraph (b) of this section, a statement, signed by the taxpayer or his authorized representative, which sets forth that the taxpayer is revoking the election previously made by him with respect to the deduction of mining exploration expenditures paid or incurred after September 12, 1966, and states with whom the document making the election was filed. A taxpayer revoking such an election shall file amended income tax returns, reflecting any increase or decrease in tax attributable to the revocation of election, for all taxable years affected by the revocation of election. See section 617(a)(2)(C) for provisions relating to the tolling of the statute of limitations for the assessment of any deficiency for any taxable year, to the extent the deficiency is attributable to an election or revocation of election under section 617(a). In applying the revocation of an election to the years affected there shall be taken into account the effect that any adjustments resulting from the revocation of election shall have on other items affected thereby, such as the deduction for charitable contributions, the foreign tax credit, net operating loss, and other deductions or credits the amount of which is limited by the taxpayer's taxable income, and the effect that adjustments of any such items have on other taxable years.
( b ) *Time for revoking election* — ( 1 ) *Election under section 615(e).* An election under section 615(e) may be revoked at any time before the expiration of the 3-year period described in paragraph (d)(1) of § 15.1-1. Such an election may not be revoked after the expiration of the 3-year period.
( 2 ) *Election under section 617(a).* An election under section 617(a) may be revoked before the expiration of the last day of the third month following the month in which the final regulations issued under the authority of section 617 are published in the Federal Register. After the expiration of this period, a taxpayer who has made an election under section 617(a) may not revoke that election unless he obtains the consent of the Secretary or his delegate in the manner to be set forth in the final regulations under section 617.
( c ) *Additional information to be furnished by a transferor of mineral property.* If, before revoking his election, the taxpayer has transferred any mineral property with respect to which he deducted exploration expenditures paid or incurred after September 12, 1966, to another person in a transaction as a result of which the basis of such property in the hands of the transferee is determined by reference to the basis in the hands of the transferor, the statement submitted pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section shall state that such property has been so transferred and shall identify the transferee, the property transferred, and the date of the transfer.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 137 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 137

   Expressing the sense of Congress that mediators should be used in 
 discussions between Congress and the President to produce a balanced 
                                budget.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 31, 1996

 Mr. Minge (for himself, Mr. Blute, Mr. Browder, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Klug, 
  Mr. Lipinski, Ms. McKinney, and Mr. Quinn) submitted the following 
     concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                    Government Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the sense of Congress that mediators should be used in 
 discussions between Congress and the President to produce a balanced 
                                budget.

Whereas Congress and the President have proposed budget reconciliation plans 
        that balance in 7 years as scored by the Congressional Budget Office;
Whereas negotiations have been suspended and may not be resumed because of 
        disagreements over the details of how to balance the budget;
Whereas the American people have called on the President and Congress to resolve 
        their differences;
Whereas the benefits of balancing the budget may be lost if differences between 
        the parties are not resolved;
Whereas our Nation has successfully mediated disputes in other regions and it is 
        common practice in the private sector to appoint a mediator when 
        negotiations reach an impasse: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that the President and Congress should 
use mediators to resolve differences over the task of balancing the 
budget in 7 years.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certificationof President and Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuantto Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Amended**

Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended (18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted), Bing Yeh, thePresident and Chief Executive Officer of Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

1.               The Company’s QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006, to which this Certificationis attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and

2.               The informationcontained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his handhereto as of the 4th day of August, 2006.

 
| /s/ Bing Yeh                          |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                                  |
| Bing Yeh                              |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, has beenprovided to Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. and will be retained by SiliconStorage Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to whichit relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission andis not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under theSecurities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespectiveof any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from the balance
sheet of CNL Income Fund VII, Ltd. at June 30, 1999, and its statement of income
for the six  months then ended and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
the  Form  10-Q  of  CNL Income Fund VII, Ltd. for the six months ended June 30,
1999.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         1,970,012<F2>
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  19,178
<ALLOWANCES>                                   16,679
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         16,586,787
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,459,373
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 25,319,329
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0<F1>
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     24,334,924
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   25,319,329
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,274,073
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  351,283
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,371,128
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,371,128
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,371,128
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Due  to  the  nature  of  its  industry,  CNL  Income  Fund VII, Ltd. has an
unclassified  balance  sheet;  therefore,  no values are shown above for current
assets and current liabilities.
<F2>Includes 1,063,383 in restricted cash.
</FN>


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 180 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 180

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 Commending the members of the Armed Forces and civilian personnel of 
the Government who served the United States faithfully during the Cold 
                                  War.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 180

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas, during the period of the Cold War, from the end of World War II until 
        the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, the United States and the 
        Soviet Union engaged in a global military rivalry;
Whereas this rivalry, potentially the most dangerous military confrontation in 
        the history of mankind, has come to a close without a direct superpower 
        military conflict;
Whereas military and civilian personnel of the Department of Defense, personnel 
        in the intelligence community, members of the foreign service, and other 
        officers and employees of the United States faithfully performed their 
        duties during the Cold War;
Whereas many such personnel performed their duties while isolated from family 
        and friends and served overseas under frequently arduous conditions in 
        order to protect the United States and achieve a lasting peace; and
Whereas the discipline and dedication of those personnel were fundamental to the 
        prevention of a superpower military conflict: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 
concurring),That Congress hereby commends, and expresses it gratitude 
and appreciation for, the service and sacrifices of the members of the 
Armed Forces and civilian personnel of the Government who contributed 
to the historic victory in the Cold War.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 26, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```