alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 19 December 2006 — Suhadolnik v Court of Justice

(Case F-78/06) (1)

(Officials - Recruitment - Appointment - Probationary period - Probationer - Establishment - Grading by grade and step - Transitional measures of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations - Admissibility the action)

(2006/C 331/110)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Simona Suhadolnik (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: S. Rodrigues, A. Jaume, and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Defendant: Court of Justice of the European Communities (represented by: M. Schauss, Agent)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Arpio and I. Sulce, Agents)

Re:

Firstly, annulment of the decision of the Court of Justice of 22 July 2005 establishing the applicant and fixing her grade in accordance with Article 12(3) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations and her step in accordance with the new version of Article 32 of the Staff Regulations and, secondly, a request for reclassification and a claim for damages.

Operative part of the order

The Tribunal:

----

(1)OJ C 237, 30.9.2006, p. 17.

----
exv10w48



 





Exhibit 10.48




FIRST AMENDMENT TO CHANGE OF CONTROL PLAN




     Pursuant to the instructions of the Board of Directors of The Houston Exploration Company
as stated in the Minutes of their May 17, 2002 meeting, the Change of Control Plan is hereby
amended as follows:



ATTACHMENT D

OUTPLACEMENT SERVICES



In the event of a Change of Control (as defined herein), any Eligible Employee who is subject to a
Qualified Termination or who resigns voluntarily with Good Reason shall be eligible to receive
Outplacement Services. The level and nature of Outplacement Services shall be consistent with the
employee’s position within the Company and shall be approved by the Vice President Human Resources
and Administration.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	THE HOUSTON EXPLORATION COMPANY

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ James F. Westmoreland
 	 
	 	Name:  James F. Westmoreland 	 
	 	Title:    Vice President & Chief Accounting Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 218 (Thursday, November 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 70209]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-29154]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Delegation of Authority: 304-1]

Delegation by the Secretary of State to the Under Secretary of 
State for Arms Control and International Security of Authority To 
Submit Certain Non-Proliferation Reports to Congress

    By virtue of the authority vested in me as the Secretary of State, 
including Section 1 of the State Department Basic Authorities Act, as 
amended (22 U.S.C. 2651a), the authorities enumerated below, and 
Executive Order 13346, I hereby delegate to the Under Secretary for 
Arms Control and International Security, to the extent authorized by 
law, the authority to approve submission of reports to Congress 
pursuant to:
    (1) Section 1344 of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal 
Year 2003, Public Law 207-228;
    (2) Section 2809(c)(2) of the Foreign Affairs Reform and 
Restructuring Act of 1998, Public Law 105-277;
    (3) Section 1343(a) of the Iran Nuclear Proliferation Prevent Act 
of 2002 (incorporated in the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, 
Fiscal Year 2003), Public Law 107-228;
    (4) Section 204(c) of the International Emergency Economic Powers 
Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) and Section 401(c) of the National 
Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.);
    (5) Section 1308(a) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act for 
FY 2003, Public Law 107-228;
    (6) Determination and Congressional Reporting Requirement 
Concerning Israeli Participation in the IAEA required by the Foreign 
Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 
2006, Title II of Public Law 109-102; and
    (7) Certification consistent with section 2(7)(C)(i) of the 
resolution of advice and consent to ratification of the Chemical 
Weapons Convention adopted by the Senate on April 24, 1997, with 
respect to the effectiveness and viability of the Australia Group.
    Any act, executive order, regulation or procedure subject to, or 
affected by this delegation shall be deemed to be such act, executive 
order, regulation or procedure, as amended from time to time.
    Notwithstanding this delegation of authority, the Secretary, the 
Deputy Secretary, or the Deputy Secretary for Management and Resources 
may at any time exercise any authority or function delegated by this 
delegation or authority.
    This Delegation of authority supersedes Delegation of Authority 
304, dated February 16, 2006, and shall be published in the Federal 
Register.

    Dated: October 28, 2011.
Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-29154 Filed 11-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-27-P
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the quarterly report of Milestone Scientific Inc. (“Milestone”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph D’Agostino, Chief Financial Officer of Milestone, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Milestone.

 

Date November 16, 2018

 

| /s/ Joseph D’Agostino                                                                                                |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Joseph D’Agostino

Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

A signed original of this certification has been provided to Milestone and will be retained by Milestone and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

** **
Editorial Note on Part 878
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 878 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 878.4160 Surgical camera and accessories. ( a ) *Identification.* A surgical camera and accessories is a device intended to be used to record operative procedures.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 878.9.
[53 FR 23872, June 24, 1988, as amended at 54 FR 13827, Apr. 5, 1989; 66 FR 38802, July 25, 2001]
**Exhibit 32**     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of PotashCorporation of Saskatchewan Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge,that:     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the “Form 10-Q”), ofthe Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated:August 5, 2005      /s/William J. Doyle  William J. Doyle
----

Commission Notice on Immunity from fines and reduction of fines in cartel cases

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/C 298/11)

I.   INTRODUCTION

II.   IMMUNITY FROM FINES

A.   Requirements to qualify for immunity from fines

B.   Procedure

III.   REDUCTION OF A FINE

A.   Requirements to qualify for reduction of a fine

B.   Procedure

IV.   CORPORATE STATEMENTS MADE TO QUALIFY UNDER THIS NOTICE

V.   GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS

----

(1)  Reference in this text to Article 81 EC also covers Article 53 EEA when applied by the Commission according to the rules laid down in Article 56 of the EEA Agreement.

(2)OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

(3)  The assessment of the threshold will have to be carried out ex ante, i.e. without taking into account whether a given inspection has or has not been successful or whether or not an inspection has or has not been carried out. The assessment will be made exclusively on the basis of the type and the quality of the information submitted by the applicant.

(4)  Corporate statements may take the form of written documents signed by or on behalf of the undertaking or be made orally.

(5)  This requires in particular that the applicant provides accurate, not misleading, and complete information. Cfr judgement of the European Court of Justice of 29 June 2006 in case C-301/04 P, Commission v SGL Carbon AG a.o., at paragraphs 68-70, and judgement of the European Court of Justice of 28 June 2005 in cases C-189/02 P, C-202/02 P, C-205/02 P, C-208/02 P and C-213/02 P, Dansk Rørindustri A/S a.o. v. Commission, at paragraphs 395-399.

(6)OJ L 1, 4.1.2003, p. 1.

(7)OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 18.

(8)OJ C 325, 22.12.2005, p. 7.

(9)  Commission Notice on cooperation within the Network of Competition Authorities, OJ C 101, 27.4.2004, p. 43.

(10)OJ L 145, 31.5.2001, p. 43.

----
§ 20.2013-3 “Second limitation”. ( a ) The amount of the Federal estate tax attributable to the transferred property in the present decedent's estate is the “second limitation”. Thus, the credit is limited to the difference between— ( 1 ) The net estate tax payable (see paragraph (b)(5) or (c), as the case may be, of § 20.0-2) with respect to the present decedent's estate, determined without regard to any credit for tax on prior transfers under section 2013 or any credit for foreign death taxes claimed under the provisions of a death tax convention, and
( 2 ) The net estate tax determined as provided in subparagraph (1) of this paragraph but computed by subtracting from the present decedent's gross estate the value of the property transferred (see § 20.2013-4), and by making only the adjustment indicated in paragraph (b) of this section if a charitable deduction is allowable to the estate of the present decedent.
( b ) If a charitable deduction is allowable to the estate of the present decedent under the provisions of section 2055 or section 2106 (a)(2) (for estates of nonresidents not citizens), for purposes of determining the tax described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, the charitable deduction otherwise allowable is reduced by an amount, E, which bears the same ratio to F (the charitable deduction otherwise allowable) as G (the value of the transferred property (see § 20.2013-4)) bears to H (the value of the present decedent's gross estate reduced by the amount of the deductions for expenses, indebtedness, taxes, losses, etc., allowed under the provisions of sections 2053 and 2054 or section 2106(a)(1) (for estates of nonresidents not citizens)). See paragraph (c)(2) of example ( 1 ) and paragraph (c)(2) of example
( 2 ) in § 20.2013-6.
( c ) If the credit for tax on prior transfers relates to property received from two or more transferors, the property received from all transferors is aggregated in determining the limitation on credit under this section (the “second limitation”). However, the limitation so determined is apportioned to the property received from each transferor in the ratio that the property received from each transferor bears to the total property received from all transferors. See paragraph (c) of example (2) in § 20.2013-6.
( d ) For illustrations of the application of this section, see examples (1) and (2) set forth in § 20.2013-6.
[T.D. 6296, 23 FR 4529, June 24, 1958; 25 FR 14021, Dec. 31, 1960, as amended by T.D. 7296, 38 FR 34191, Dec. 12, 1973]
April 17, 2013 

Custer County Commissioners 

1 01 0 Main Street 

Miles City. MT 59301 

Dear Commissioners: 

(· .. 

".. ·~·-. 

: ~ f ~ .. i _j 

Holy Rosary Healthcare is extremely supportive of the essential air services (EAS) program for 

Miles City, Montana. The impact of the loss ofEAS to Holy Rosary Healthcare (HRH) would 

be significant. HRH depends on this service tor the recruitment of and coverage by physicians 

and other essential healthcare professionals. Being able to maintain appropriate healthcare 

coverage is critical not only to the members of our community but also to the surrounding 

communities that depend on the services HRH provides. 

In addition, our corporate offices are located in Denver, CO which requires several HRH 

associates to travel to Denver monthly. The change in airlines in 2011, eliminating a direct flight 

to Denver from Miles City, created a substantially negative impact on travel volumes as our 

associates must now fly out of Billings, MT. This has also created a critical impact on higher 

travel costs for HRH and other businesses in our community. 

The effects of Miles City losing the EAS program could be damaging to all of southeastern 

Montana. HRH would be appreciative for the continuation of the EAS program in Miles City. 

Sincerely, 

----, 

1/ ~/;).___ 

Paul Lewis 

Chief Executive Officer 

2600 Wilson Street· Mile.r Ci(y, Montana 59301 .f-06-233-2600
#### § 1.818-4 [Reserved]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary

                    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201*et seq.*). The due date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate cases a final order without further proceedings.                

*Docket Number:*                     DOT-OST-2004-18468.                

*Date Filed:*                     July 16, 2009.                

*Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify Scope:*                     August 6, 2009.                

*Description:*                     Application of Polar Air Cargo Worldwide, Inc. requesting renewal of its certificate of public convenience and necessity for Route 820 authorizing it to provide scheduled foreign air transportation of property and mail between any point or points in the United States, via any intermediate points, to a point or points in China open to scheduled international operations, and beyond to any points outside of China, with full traffic rights.                

Renee V. Wright,

Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. E9-18688 Filed 8-4-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.6074-1 Time for filing declarations of estimated income tax by corporations.

For provisions relating to time for filing declarations of estimated income tax by corporations, see §§ 1.6074-1 to 1.6074-3, inclusive, of this chapter (Income Tax Regulations).
Order entered August 8, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00907-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF H.B.C., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 397th Judicial District Court

Grayson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. FA-17-1672

ORDER

Before the Court is the request of Paula Thomas, Official Court Reporter for the 397th 

Judicial District Court, for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. We GRANT the 

request and extend the time to Monday, August 19, 2019. 

/s/ KEN MOLBERG 

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         434,082
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,361,485
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,795,567
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          491,089
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,304,478
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,795,567
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               56,237
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               23,539
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   23,539
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   32,698
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .00


</TABLE>
IV

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 189

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the importance of United

States membership in regional South Pacific organizations.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 18, 1996

Mr. GILMAN (for himself, Mr. BEREUTER, Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA, and Mr. BERMAN) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the importance of United States membership in regional South

Pacific organizations.

Whereas the United States and the South Pacific region

enjoy a close and historic partnership built on a strong

foundation of shared values and an unshakable commitment to democracy, development, and human rights;

Whereas the island countries of the Pacific, together with

New Zealand and Australia, share many of the global objectives of the United States, including the nonproliferation of nuclear weapons, unique ecosystems, and sustainable economic development consistent with good resource

management practices; and
2

•HCON 189 IH

Whereas the United States is a member of the regional economic and social development body, the South Pacific

Commission, the regional environmental body, the South

Pacific Regional Environment Program, as well as being

a dialogue partner for the regional political body, the

South Pacific Forum: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) recognizes the traditional and close ties be4 tween the United States and the South Pacific re5 gion and reaffirms the value of these ties;

6 (2) notes the need to continue to support the

7 efforts of the countries of the region to enhance the

8 sustainable development of the more fragile island

9 economies and their integration into the regional

10 economy, while helping to ensure the protection of

11 the unique ecosystems of the region;

12 (3) commends the South Pacific Commission

13 for the process of managerial and organizational re14 form currently being undertaken, and recognizes the

15 important role the United States financial contribu16 tion to, and participation in, the organization makes

17 in assisting it to realize the gradual economic self18 sufficiency to all members of the organization; and

19 (4) reaffirms the commitment of the United

20 States as a member of the South Pacific Commis21 sion and the South Pacific Regional Environment
3

•HCON 189 IH

1 Programme, and the post-forum dialogue partner2 ship of the United States with the South Pacific

3 Forum.

Æ