alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
39739.

#### PADGETT v. THE STATE.

Decided September 18, 1962

Rehearing denied October 3, 1962.

*Frank G. Wilson,*for plaintiff in error.

*Wm. M. West, Solicitor General, Jack J. Gautier,*contra.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

1. Where the State, in a criminal case, introduces evidence that the accused was at the scene of a crime and immediately thereafter ran to avoid arrest a charge on “flight” is authorized. See *Lewis v. State,*200 Ga. 388 (37 SE2d 405), and citations.

2. There was evidence in the present case that the accused, after attempting to rob a service station, ran when help arrived to aid the attendant in charge of such service station. The charge on flight was authorized.

3. The verdict was authorized by the evidence and the trial court did not err in overruling the defendant’s motion for new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Frankum and Jordan, JJ., concur.*
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.6806-1 Posting occupational tax stamps.

For provisions relating to the posting of specific stamps used with respect to a particular tax, other than a special tax under subchapter B of chapter 35, subchapter B of chapter 36, or subtitle E, see the regulations relating to such tax. For penalties for failure to post occupational tax stamps, see section 7273.

[T.D. 7188, 37 FR 12795, June 29, 1972]
----

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 27 September 2006 — Telefónica v OHIM — Branch (emergia)

(Case T-172/04) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the figurative Community trade mark emergia - Earlier word Community trade mark EMERGEA - Likelihood of confusion - Refusal to register - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2006/C 294/93)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Telefónica, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: A. Sirimarco, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Laporta Insa, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the Court of First Instance: David Branch (Reading, United Kingdom) (represented by: initially, C. Berenguer Marsal, and subsequently, I.M. Barroso Sánchez-Lafuente and M.C. Trullols Durán, lawyers)

Re:

Action for annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 March 2004 (Case R 676/2002-1) relating to opposition proceedings between David Branch and Telefónica, SA.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

----

(1)OJ C 179, 10.07.2004.

----
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 18

- 00143

- CR

PATRICK HENRY FEATHE RSTON

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the County Court at Law No

. 1

Brazos County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17

- 00865

- CRM

- CCL1

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Patrick Henry Featherston has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2(a). We have not issued a decision in this appeal, and Featherston

personally signed the motion. The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

We also grant Featherston ’s request that the mandate issue at this Court’s earliest

c onvenience. See id. R. 18.3(c). The Clerk’s Office is directed to issue the mandate

concurrently with the rendering of the judgment.Featherston v. State Page 2 REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis , and

Justice Scoggins

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed November 7, 2018

Do not p ublish

[C R25]
Financial Astrology by Mahendra Sharma

http://www.mahendraprophecy.com/pdf-viewer.php?opdf=906OPDFS314c85f4f4a66b5edd1d86039ee507a2[4/18/2014 4:24:04 PM]

Please allow a few minutes for the reader to load...
Amendment to Severance and Retirement Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
 SEVERANCE AND RETIREMENT AGREEMENT 
 AMENDMENT dated as of February 28, 2007 to Severance
Agreement dated as of January 1, 1999 (the “Agreement”), as amended, between FORTUNE BRANDS, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and NORMAN H. WESLEY (the “Executive”). 
 WITNESSETH: 
 WHEREAS, the Company and
the Executive have previously amended the Agreement as of January 1, 2000 and February 3, 2003; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company and the
Executive desire to further amend the Agreement in order to reduce the amount of additional retirement plan service credited to Executive under certain circumstances. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the parties agree that the Agreement is amended as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Section 3(a)(i) is amended so that subsection (y) thereof reads as follows: 

 “(y) the Executive had accumulated an additional period of Benefit Service thereunder (subsequent to his Termination Date) until the third anniversary of the Termination Date or, if the Executive’s Normal
Retirement Date occurs prior to the third anniversary of the Termination Date, until the Executive’s Normal Retirement Date, at his rate of Compensation in effect on the date hereof plus any increases subsequent thereto,” 
  

	 	2.	Section 3(a) is amended so that the last sentence thereof reads as follows: 

 “For purposes of clause (i) there shall be considered as part of the Executive’s Compensation for the period from the Termination Date to the third anniversary of the Termination Date or, if the
Executive’s Normal Retirement Date occurs prior to the third anniversary of the Termination Date, until the Executive’s Normal Retirement Date, for purposes of determining his highest consecutive calendar three-year average rate of
Compensation the sum of (x) the Executive’s annual base salary at the rate in effect on the date hereof plus any increases subsequent thereto plus (y) the amount awarded to the Executive under the Incentive Compensation Plans for the
year immediately prior to the Termination Date or, if higher, for the year in which the Termination Date occurs (whether or not paid).” 







 Except as amended hereby, all provisions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect. 
  

					
	[Seal]	 	FORTUNE BRANDS, INC.
			
		 	By:	 	 /s/ Mark A. Roche

	ATTEST:	 		 	
			
	 /s/ Elizabeth R. Lane
	 		 	
		 		 	 /s/ Norman H. Wesley

		 		 	Norman H. Wesley
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 278

Relating to Pakistan.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 7 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Mr. ROBB submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Foreign Relations

RESOLUTION

Relating to Pakistan.

Whereas the United States government has longstanding policies opposing the spread of terrorism and narcotics trafficking;

Whereas the United States government has committed massive amounts of funding through the years to combat

both of these problems;

Whereas on January 7, 1993, the Islamic Republic of Pakistan was placed on the State Department’s watch list of

nations suspected of supporting terrorism;

Whereas on July 14, 1993, the State Department removed

the Islamic Republic of Pakistan from the watch list;

Whereas former Pakistan Prime Minister Narwaz Sharif recently alleged that his Army Chief of Staff, General

Aslam Beg, and General Asad Durrani, head of the Inter
2

SRES 278 IS

Service Intelligence Agency, had informed him while in

office that the Pakistani Army and ISI planned to conduct covert acts of terrorism in other countries and fund

these activities through large scale narcotics sales;

Whereas 317 Indian citizens were killed in March 1993, in

a series of bombings of the Bombay Stock Exchange and

other sites in Bombay;

Whereas a leading suspect in the bombing has publicly implicated the Pakistan government in the bombings by alleging that the ISI provided weapons, money, and explosives

for the attacks in Bombay;

Whereas former Prime Minister Sharif recently stated that

Pakistan has possessed nuclear weapons for several

years;

Whereas in 1985, the United States Congress enacted legislation prohibiting foreign assistance to Pakistan unless the

President certified that Pakistan does not possess a nuclear explosive device; and

Whereas President Bush and President Clinton have been unable to certify that Pakistan does not possess a nuclear

explosive device: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that:

2 (1) the United States condemns the alleged in3 volvement of Pakistan in acts of terrorism in other

4 countries;

5 (2) the United States condemns any involve6 ment by Pakistan in the illegal manufacture, sale,

7 transportation, or distribution of any narcotic sub8 stance;
3

SRES 278 IS

1 (3) the Administration should review the 1993

2 State Department decision to remove Pakistan from

3 the Watch List of nations suspected of involvement

4 in terrorism abroad; and

5 (4) the United States reaffirms current law

6 prohibiting foreign assistance to Pakistan in light of

7 Prime Minister Sharif’s claim that Pakistan has pos8 sessed a nuclear weapon for several years.

Æ
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 03377

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name3

Description

x 03377\03377_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03377\03377_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x 03377\03377_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03377\03377_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03377\03377_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03377\03377_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03377\03377_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03377\03377_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

03377\Supporting Documents\map001.JPG Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

3

 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 98

To refer S. 794 entitled, ‘‘A bill for the relief of land grantors in Henderson,

Union and Webster counties, Kentucky, and their heirs,’’ to the Chief

Judge of the United States Claims Court for a report thereon.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 19, 1993

Mr. FORD submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

To refer S. 794 entitled, ‘‘A bill for the relief of land

grantors in Henderson, Union and Webster counties,

Kentucky, and their heirs,’’ to the Chief Judge of the

United States Claims Court for a report thereon.

1 Resolved, That the bill (S. 794) entitled ‘‘A bill for

2 the relief of land grantors in Henderson, Union, and Web3 ster Counties, Kentucky, and their heirs’’, now pending

4 in the Senate, together with all accompanying papers, is

5 referred to the Chief Judge of the United States Court

6 of Claims. The Chief Judge shall proceed with the same

7 in accordance with the provisions of sections 1492 and

8 2509 of title 28, United States Code, and report back to
2

•SRES 98 IS

1 the Senate, at the earliest practicable date, giving such

2 findings of fact and conclusions that are sufficient to in3 form Congress of the amount, if any, legally or equitably

4 due from the United States to the claimants individually.

Æ
### The Honorable Stephen Reasoner, Chief Judge, United State s 1 

### District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable H. David Young, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. ___________ No. 95-2256

___________ Larry Friar, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas * Eastern District of Arkansas. Department of Correction, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: March 5, 1996 Filed: March 11, 1996

___________ Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Arkansas inmate Larry Friar appeals from the distric t court's denial 1 of his petition for habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 . Havingreviewed the record, we conclude no error of law appears and w e affirm the judgment of the district court for th e reasons set forth in its opinion. See8th Cir . R. 47B. We deny Friar's motion for appointment of counsel.

### -2- A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### § 20.2014-6 Period of limitations on credit.

The credit for foreign death taxes under section 2014 is limited to those taxes which were actually paid and for which a credit was claimed within four years after the filing of the estate tax return for the decedent's estate. If, however, a petition has been filed with the Tax Court of the United States for the redetermination of a deficiency within the time prescribed in section 6213(a), the credit is limited to those taxes which were actually paid and for which a credit was claimed within four years after the filing of the return, or before the expiration of 60 days after the decision of the Tax Court becomes final, whichever period is the last to expire. Similarly, if an extension of time has been granted under section 6161 for payment of the tax shown on the return, or of a deficiency, the credit is limited to those taxes which were actually paid and for which a credit was claimed within four years after the filing of the return, or before the date of the expiration of the period of the extension, whichever period is the last to expire. See section 2015 for the applicable period of limitations for credit for foreign death taxes on reversionary or remainder interests if an election is made under section 6163(a) to postpone payment of the estate tax attributable to reversionary or remainder interests. If a claim for refund based on the credit for foreign death taxes is filed within the applicable period described in this section, a refund may be made despite the general limitation provisions of sections 6511 and 6512. Any refund based on the credit for foreign death taxes shall be made without interest.
§ 1.6011-1 General requirement of return, statement, or list. ( a ) *General rule.* Every person subject to any tax, or required to collect any tax, under Subtitle A of the Code, shall make such returns or statements as are required by the regulations in this chapter. The return or statement shall include therein the information required by the applicable regulations or forms.
( b ) *Use of prescribed forms.* Copies of the prescribed return forms will so far as possible be furnished taxpayers by district directors. A taxpayer will not be excused from making a return, however, by the fact that no return form has been furnished to him. Taxpayers not supplied with the proper forms should make application therefor to the district director in ample time to have their returns prepared, verified, and filed on or before the due date with the internal revenue office where such returns are required to be filed. Each taxpayer should carefully prepare his return and set forth fully and clearly the information required to be included therein. Returns which have not been so prepared will not be accepted as meeting the requirements of the Code. In the absence of a prescribed form, a statement made by a taxpayer disclosing his gross income and the deductions therefrom may be accepted as a tentative return, and, if filed within the prescribed time, the statement so made will relieve the taxpayer from liability for the addition to tax imposed for the delinquent filing of the return, provided that without unnecessary delay such a tentative return is supplemented by a return made on the proper form.
( c ) *Tax withheld on nonresident aliens and foreign corporations.* For requirements respecting the return of the tax required to be withheld under chapter 3 of the Code on nonresident aliens and foreign corporations and tax-free covenant bonds, see § 1.1461-2.
[T.D. 6500, 25 FR 12108, Nov. 26, 1960, as amended by T.D. 6922, 32 FR 8713, June 17, 1967]
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 150 (Thursday, August 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 39377]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18774]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 4 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, Tennessee, and 
Wisconsin)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 4 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, 
ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, September 15, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Smiley at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-
231-2360.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Area 4 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Tuesday, September 15, 2009 at 1 p.m. Central Time via telephone 
conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, 
notification of intent to participate must be made with Ellen Smiley. 
For more information please contact Ms. Smiley at 1-888-912-1227 or 
414-231-2360, or write TAP Office Stop 1006MIL, 211 West Wisconsin 
Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221, or post comments to the Web site: 
http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: July 30, 2009.
Shawn F. Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E9-18774 Filed 8-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 221 Agreed to House (ATH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 221

Directing the Clerk of the House to make corrections in the enrollment 
                             of H.R. 3159.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 26, 1996

 Mr. Shuster submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Directing the Clerk of the House to make corrections in the enrollment 
                             of H.R. 3159.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 3159, the Clerk of the House 
of Representatives shall make the following corrections:
            (1) In section 5902(b) proposed to be inserted in title 49, 
        United States Code, by section 204(b), strike ``electric'' and 
        insert ``electronic''.
            (2) In section 204(e)(1), by inserting after 
        ``respectively'' the following: ``, and by moving the text of 
        paragraph (2), as so redesignated down 1 line and to the left, 
        flush full measure and indenting such paragraph''.
            (3) In section 205(1), by inserting ``in subsection (a)'' 
        before ``a comma''.
            (4) In paragraph (4) of section 5905(a) proposed to be 
        inserted in title 49, United States Code, by section 206, after 
        ``(c),'', move the remainder of the text of the paragraph down 
        1 line and to the left, flush full measure.
            (5) In section 206(2), by striking ``(9)(b)(1)'' and 
        inserting ``(b)(1)''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             982,000
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,688,000
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,923,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,702,000
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           218,000
<OTHER-SE>                                        (997,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,923,000
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     2,000
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,689,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (49,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (10,876,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,638,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   7,686,000 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    552,000 
<CHANGES>                                                0 
<NET-INCOME>                                   (10,876,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.55)
        


</TABLE>
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED J ASON M. OSBORN , A ppellant ,
v. Case No

. 5D 21

- 659 LT Cas e No. 2013- CF

- 000247 -A

STAT E OF FLORIDA ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Decision filed J anuary 31 , 20 23 3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Citrus County , Mark J. Yerman , J udge. Jas on M. Osborn, Raiford , pro se. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison L ei gh Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM. A FFIRMED.

EVAN DER , WALLIS and EISNAUGLE , JJ., conc ur.