alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

Action brought on 11 October 2006 — TORRES v OHIM — Bodegas Cándido (TORRE DE FRIAS)

(Case T-285/06)

(2006/C 310/38)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Miguel Torres S.A. (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: E. Armijo Chávarri, M. A. Baz de San Ceferino and A. Castán Pérez-Gόmez, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Bodegas Cándido S.A.

Form of order sought

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Bodegas Cándido S.A.

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark TORRE DE FRIAS for goods in Class 33 — Application No 305 151.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant.

Mark or sign cited in opposition: National word marks TORRES, international word mark TORRES, and international word mark LAS TORRES for goods in Class 33.

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition dismissed.

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed.

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1) since the word TORRE is the dominant component in the overall impression produced by the mark applied for there are aural and visual similarities between the conflicting marks, and there is a likelihood of confusion between them which makes it impossible for them to coexist on the market.

----

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

----
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 152 (Monday, August 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39938-39940]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18960]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal Nos. 09-36]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 
601-3740.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittals 09-36 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

    Dated: July 28, 2009.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 39939]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10AU09.004


[[Page 39940]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10AU09.005

[FR Doc. E9-18960 Filed 8-7-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
(logo) Rialto CAPITAL

 

 

2016 Annual Statement ofServicer Compliance (Item 1123)

 

Pooling and ServicingAgreement (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) dated as ofDecember 1, 2015 by and among Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc.,as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, RialtoCapital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as TrustAdvisor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Certificate Administrator,as Tax Administrator and as Custodian, and Wilmington Trust, NationalAssociation as Trustee relating to the Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust2015-NXS4, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-NXS4(WFCM 2015-NXS4)

 

 

The undersigned, a dulyauthorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the“Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:

 

1. All servicing activitiesand performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and ServicingAgreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.

 

2. A review of the servicingactivities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1,2016 to December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”) in accordancewith the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under mysupervision.

 

3. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in allmaterial respects for the Reporting Period and if there has been a failure tofulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and thenature and status thereof has been specifically identified herein.

 

 

Certified by: /s/ Adam Singer

Adam Singer, Managing Director

Date: March 1, 2017
EXHIBIT 32


               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of GUNDAKER/JORDAN AMERICAN HOLDINGS,
INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005, (the
"Report"), I, W. Neal Jordan, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial and
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1)  The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.


June 24, 2005



/s/ W. Neal Jordan
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial and
Accounting Officer
**
**Exhibit 32**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, UnitedStates Code), each of the undersigned officers of Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2017 (the“Form 10-Q”), of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date:October 31, 2017 

 
By: 
/s/ Jochen E. Tilk
 Jochen E. Tilk *President and Chief Executive Officer*
Date: October 31, 2017 

 
By: 
/s/ Wayne R. Brownlee
 Wayne R. Brownlee *Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer*
The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant toItem 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K, Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and,accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
**
**Exhibit 11**POTASH CORPORATION OF SASKATCHEWAN INC.COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS(1)FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30               **2005** **2004**    ** ** ** **A Net income as reported, Canadian GAAP ($ millions) $295.5  $123.3            B Items adjusting net income(2) ($ millions) $(8.8) $2.2            C Net income, US GAAP(2) ($ millions) $286.7  $125.5            D Weighted average number of shares outstanding  110,365,000   106,866,000            E Net additional shares issuable fordiluted earnings per share calculation  3,041,000   1,364,000              CANADIAN GAAP                     Basic earnings per share (A/D) $2.68  $1.15              Diluted earnings per share (A/(D+E)) $2.61  $1.14              UNITED STATES GAAP(2)                     Basic earnings per share (C/D) $2.60  $1.17              Diluted earnings per share (C/(D+E)) $2.53  $1.16 (1)   In the third quarter of 2004, the Board of Directors of PCSapproved a split of the company’s outstanding common shares on a two-for-one basis in the form of astock dividend. All comparative share and per-share data have been retroactively adjusted toreflect the stock split.(2)   US GAAP figures restated, as described and quantified in Note 17 to the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements includedin this Amendment.
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 221

Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the case of United States

v. Knox.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 14 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Mr. ROTH (for himself and Mr. GRASSLEY) submitted the following resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the case of

United States v. Knox.

Whereas the United States Congress has passed legislation to

protect children against the evils of child pornography,

including the Child Protection Act of 1984, and provided

for the enforcement of those laws;

Whereas on November 4, 1993, the United States Senate, by

a vote of 100-to-0, denounced as improper the United

States Justice Department’s new, narrow interpretation

of the Federal child pornography statutes as delineated

by the Solicitor General in the case of United States v.

Knox and implored the Justice Department to properly

enforce the law and protect our Nation’s children; and

Whereas, on June 9, 1994, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in the case of United States
2

•SRES 221 IS

v. Knox rejected the Justice Department’s narrow interpretation of the Federal child pornography statutes and

reinstate the conviction of Stephen Knox: Now, therefore,

be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the

2 Justice Department should accept the persuasive opinion

3 of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Cir4 cuit in the case of United States v. Knox and that the

5 Justice Department should vigorously oppose any effort

6 by the defendant in that case, or any other party, to over7 turn the decision in that case.

Æ
#### § 20.6321 Statutory provisions; lien for taxes.

Sec. 6321. *Lien for taxes.* If any person liable to pay any tax neglects or refuses to pay the same after demand, the amount (including any interest, additional amount, addition to tax, or assessable penalty, together with any costs that may accrue in addition thereto) shall be a lien in favor of the United States upon all property and rights to property, whether real or personal, belonging to such person.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         865,456
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,177,969
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,490,817
<PP&E>                                       1,103,278
<DEPRECIATION>                                 541,637
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,335,018
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,850,372
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,861
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,472,785
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,335,018
<SALES>                                      7,491,582
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,491,582
<CGS>                                        5,207,675
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,207,675
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,717,534
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (433,627)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (147,556)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (286,071)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (286,071)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
§ 20.6324B-1 Special lien for additional estate tax attributable to farm, etc., valuation. ( a ) *General rule.* In the case of an estate of a decedent dying after December 31, 1976, which includes any interest in qualified real property, if the executor elects to value part or all of such property pursuant to section 2032A, a lien arises in favor of the United States on the property to which the election applies. The lien is in the amount equal to the adjusted tax difference attributable to such interest (as defined by section 2032A(c)(2)(B)). The term “qualified real property” means qualified real property as defined in section 2032A(b), qualified replacement property within the meaning of section 2032A(h)(3)(B), and qualified exchange property within the meaning of section 2032A(i)(3). The rules set forth in the regulations under section 2032A shall apply in determining whether this section is applicable to otherwise qualified real property held by a partnership, corporation or trust.
( b ) *Period of lien.* The lien shall arise at the time the executor files an election under section 2032A. It shall remain in effect until one of the following occurs: ( 1 ) The liability for the additional estate tax under section 2032A(c) with respect to such interest has been satisfied; or
( 2 ) Such liability has become unenforceable by reason of lapse of time; or
( 3 ) The district director is satisfied that no further liability for additional estate tax with respect to such interest may arise under section 2032A(c), i.e., the required time period has elapsed since the decedent's death without the occurrence of an event described in section 2032A(c)(1), or the qualified heir (as defined in section 2032A(e)(1)) had died. For procedures regarding the release or subordination of liens or discharge of property from liens, see § 301.6325-1 of this chapter (Regulations on Procedure and Administration).
( c ) *Substitution of security for lien.* The district director may, upon written application of the qualified heir (as defined in section 2032A(e) (1)) acquiring any interest in qualified real property to which a lien imposed by section 6324B attaches, issue a certificate of discharge of any or all property subject to such lien, after receiving a bond or other security in an amount or value determined by the district director as sufficient security for the maximum potential liability for additional estate tax with respect to such interest. Any bond shall be in the form and with the security prescribed in § 301.7101-1 of this chapter.
( d ) *Special rules.* The rules set forth in section 6324A(d) (1), (3), and (4), and the regulations thereunder, shall apply with respect to a lien imposed by section 6324B as if it were a lien imposed by section 6324A.
[T.D. 7847, 47 FR 50856, Nov. 10, 1982]
Exhibit 10.25


    
      

    

     

    
      Exhibit
        10.25


      BASE
        SALARIES OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

      


      
        	
                Named
                  Executive Officer

              	
                Base
                  Salary

              
	 	 
	
                Robert
                  L. Long

                Chief
                  Executive Officer

              	
                $850,000

              
	 	 
	
                Jean
                  P. Cahuzac

                President

              	
                $515,000

              
	 	 
	
                Steven
                  L. Newman

                Executive
                  Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

              	
                $415,000

              
	 	 
	
                Gregory
                  L. Cauthen

                Senior
                  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

              	
                $385,000

              
	 	 
	
                Eric
                  B. Brown

                Senior
                  Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate
                  Secretary

              	
                $365,000
§ 26.6695-1 Other assessable penalties with respect to the preparation of tax returns for other persons. ( a ) *In general.* A person who is a tax return preparer of any return or claim for refund of generation-skipping transfer tax under chapter 13 of subtitle B of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) shall be subject to penalties for failure to furnish a copy to the taxpayer under section 6695(a) of the Code, failure to sign the return under section 6695(b) of the Code, failure to furnish an identification number under section 6695(c) of the Code, failure to retain a copy or list under section 6695(d) of the Code, failure to file a correct information return under section 6695(e) of the Code, and negotiation of a check under section 6695(f) of the Code, in the manner stated in § 1.6695-1 of this chapter.
( b ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section is applicable to returns and claims for refund filed after December 31, 2008.
[T.D. 9436, 73 FR 78453, Dec. 22, 2008]
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 125 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 125

          Relating to the retirement of Thomas L. Nottingham.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 23 (legislative day, June 22), 1993

    Mr. Mitchell (for himself, Mr. Dole, Mr. Ford, and Mr. Simpson) 
 submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
          Relating to the retirement of Thomas L. Nottingham.

Whereas the Senate has been advised of the retirement of Thomas L. Nottingham, 
        Chief of the United States Capitol Guide Service effective June 30, 
        1993;
Whereas a professional Capitol Guide Service has been essential in expanding 
        learning and appreciation about the Capitol to the million and a half 
        Americans who visit each year;
Whereas Thomas L. Nottingham worked tirelessly for passage of legislation in 
        1971 to establish a professional salaried Guide Service;
Whereas he has devoted 30 years of his life to promoting the Capitol and 
        educating the American people about the historic building housing the 
        Congress; and
Whereas he has gained the admiration and respect of his associates and the 
        Members of the United States Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the United States Senate recognizes the notable 
contributions made by Thomas L. Nottingham to the Senate and to his 
country and express to him its appreciation and gratitude for his long, 
faithful and outstanding service.
    Sec. 2. The Secretary of the Senate is directed to transmit a copy 
of this resolution to Thomas L. Nottingham.

                                 <all>
```
ARON EASLEY

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 5028

____________ _________________/

Opinion filed March 4, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Linda L. Nobles , Judge

.

Aron Easley, pro se , Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM

.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAn N+3 Technology Level Reference Propulsion SystemAn N+3 technology level engine, suitable as a propulsion system for an advanced single-aisle transport, was developed as a reference cycle for use in technology assessment and decision-making efforts. This reference engine serves three main purposes: it provides thermodynamic quantities at each major engine station, it provides overall propulsion system performance data for vehicle designers to use in their analyses, and it can be used for comparison against other proposed N+3 technology-level propulsion systems on an equal basis. This reference cycle is meant to represent the expected capability of gas turbine engines in the N+3 timeframe given reasonable extrapolations of technology improvements and the ability to take full advantage of those improvements.Document ID20170005426Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsJones, Scott M.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Haller, William J.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Tong, Michael To-Hing*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredJune 9, 2017Publication DateMay 1, 2017Subject CategoryAircraft Propulsion And PowerAircraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberE-19373NASA/TM-2017-219501GRC-E-DAA-TN41487Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 081876.02.03.30.04Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20170005426.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 13.11 Revocation of election to report income on the installment basis. ( a ) *In general.* Under section 453(c)(4) taxpayers who are dealers in personal property and who elected installment-basis income reporting, subject to the provisions of section 453(c)(1) (relating to change from accrual to installment basis), may revoke their previously made election.
( b ) *Time and manner of revoking election.* The revocation by a taxpayer may be made by filing an amended return on an appropriate form or forms, such as Form 1040X for an individual taxpayer, for the year of change (the first year for which income was computed using the installment basis) and for each subsequent year for which a return was filed using the installment basis. The taxpayer should indicate on such amended returns that he is revoking an election to report income on the installment basis. Such revocation must be made within 3 years from the last date prescribed for the filing of the return for the year of change including any extension of time granted the taxpayer. In reporting income on the amended returns described in this section, the taxpayer shall use the accrual method of accounting.
[T.D. 7044, 35 FR 8823, June 6, 1970]