alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Gehl
Company's consolidated balance sheet at September 27, 1997 and consolidated
statements of income for the nine month period ended September 27, 1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                            3204
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    69784
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                      16877
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 95210
<PP&E>                                           62240
<DEPRECIATION>                                   37061
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  129926
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            38950
<BONDS>                                          12016<F2>
<COMMON>                                           620
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       74140
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    129926
<SALES>                                         143407 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                143407
<CGS>                                           100070
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   100070
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1339
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  15417
<INCOME-TAX>                                      5550
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               9867
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      9867
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F3>
<FN>
<F1>Company presents receivables on a net basis in compliance with Article 10
of Regulation S-X.
<F2>Includes all non-current portion of debt obligations
<F3>Not reported
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Geology of epigenetic uranium deposits in sandstone in the 
United States

#### Professional Paper 538

Tweet


#### Links

- More information: **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**     
                             (html)
- Document: **Document**                                
  (pdf)
- Plates:
- **Plate 1**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 2**                                
    (pdf)
- Paper 
  version: **USGS Store**
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp538 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 
2012 00:05:41
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.6231(c)-7 Bankruptcy and receivership. ( a ) *Bankruptcy.* The treatment of items as partnership items with respect to a partner named as a debtor in a bankruptcy proceeding will interfere with the effective and efficient enforcement of the internal revenue laws. Accordingly, partnership items of such a partner arising in any partnership taxable year ending on or before the last day of the latest taxable year of the partner with respect to which the United States could file a claim for income tax due in the bankruptcy proceeding shall be treated as nonpartnership items as of the date the petition naming the partner as debtor is filed in bankruptcy.
( b ) *Receivership.* The treatment of items as partnership items with respect to a partner for whom a receiver has been appointed in any receivership proceeding before any court of the United States or of any State or the District of Columbia will interfere with the effective and efficient enforcement of the internal revenue laws. Accordingly, partnership items of such a partner arising in any partnership taxable year ending on or before the last day of the latest taxable year of the partner with respect to which the United States could file a claim for income tax due in the receivership proceeding shall be treated as nonpartnership items as of the date a receiver is appointed in any receivership proceeding before any court of the United States or of any State or the District of Columbia.
( c ) *Effective date.* This section is applicable to partnership taxable years beginning on or after October 4, 2001. For years beginning prior to October 4, 2001, see § 301.6231(c)-7T contained in 26 CFR part 1, revised April 1, 2001.
[T.D. 8965, 66 FR 50561, Oct. 4, 2001]
#### Carolyn C. Willard *v.*Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Hartford

*John B. Willard,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

*Joseph J. Burns,*assistant corporation counsel, for the appellee (defendant).

Argued June 2

decided June 2, 1964

The motion by the plaintiff, in her appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Hartford County, for an order directing judgment in her favor is denied.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 151 (Friday, August 7, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39612-39613]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18832]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Lake Tahoe Basin Federal Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Lake Tahoe Basin Federal Advisory Committee will hold a 
meeting on August 25, 2009 at The Chateau, 955 Fairway Blvd., Incline 
Village, NV 89451. This Committee, established by the Secretary of 
Agriculture on December 15, 1998 (64 FR 2876), is chartered to provide 
advice to the Secretary on implementing the terms of the Federal 
Interagency Partnership on the Lake Tahoe Region and other matters 
raised by the Secretary.

DATES: The meeting will be held August 25, 2009, beginning at 1 p.m. 
and ending at 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at The Chateau, 955 Fairway 
Boulevard, Incline Village, NV 89451.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR TO REQUEST AN ACCOMMODATION (ONE WEEK PRIOR 
TO MEETING DATE) CONTACT: Linda Lind, Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit, 
Forest Service, 35 College Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150, (530) 
543-2787.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Items to be covered on the agenda include: 
(1) Discussion of the Tahoe Science Consortium review of capital 
projects for monitoring and adaptive management opportunities; (2) 
review of the Erosion Control Program process and priorities; and (3) 
Public Comment. All Lake Tahoe Basin Federal Advisory Committee 
meetings are open to the public. Interested citizens are encouraged to 
attend at the above address. Issues may be brought to the attention of 
the Committee during the open public comment period at the meeting or 
by filing written statements with the secretary for the Committee 
before or after the meeting. Please refer

[[Page 39613]]

any written comments to the Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit at the 
contact address stated above.

    Dated: July 31, 2009.
Gina Thompson,
Acting Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. E9-18832 Filed 8-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
# Emergency Situations 

# II Return Home 

### & Land Mode Be sure you are in a large open area. Before you take off, make sureyou have a good GPS lock by ensuring your LED indicators are flashing Green. Fly the Phantom at least 50ft away from your take off point. Turn offthe Remote Controller. The Phantom will enter itIs failsafe Return-To-Home Mode. Letthe Phantom finish itIs routine and land itselfwithin 2 meters ofthe take off point. 

# t:r----

----------,

El 15 meters I I I 

# •

Intercepting Return Home 

### & Land Mode Be sure you are in a large open area. Beforeyou take off, make sure you have a good GPS lock by ensuring your LED indicators are flashing Green. Fly the Phantom 50ft away from your take off point.Turn offthe Remote Controller. The Phantom will enter it Is failsafe Return-To-Home Mode. When the Phantom is returning home, you can intercept RTH Mode by switching the Sl Switch from the top position to the middle or lower position,then continue flying the Phantom.

# --**----** • I 

# ' •
1 15 meters

## www.dji.com

Copyright:2014 DJIInnovations. All Rights Reserved.
# C_2015007EN.01004302.xml

| 12.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/43

---

Action brought on 5 November 2014 — Montenegro v OHIM (Shape of a bottle)

(Case T-748/14)

(2015/C 007/49)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Montenegro Srl (Zola Predosa, Italy) (represented by: F. Jacobacci, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Trade mark at issue: International Registration No 1 1 62  963 designating the European Union in respect of the tri-dimensional mark representing a shape of a bottle

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 August 2014 in Case R 20/2014-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the contested decision;

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of the PrincipalExecutive Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section1350**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kaiser GroupHoldings, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending September 30, 2004 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Douglas W. McMinn, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 that:

 

(1)  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| November 15, 2004 | /s/ Douglas W. McMinn                 |   |
|-------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|              | Douglas W. McMinn,                    |
|              | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to theextent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “ExchangeAct”).  Such certification will not bedeemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Actof 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Companyspecifically incorporates it by reference.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 1, 2012

t0529 

# Order

June 1, 2012

145079 & (82)

COALITION FOR A SAFER DETROIT, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145079 COA: 300516 Wayne CC: 10-009328-AW DETROIT CITY CLERK and DETROIT ELECTION COMMISSION, Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the Fe bruary 9, 2012 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be revi ewed by this Court.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 149 (Wednesday, August 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 39118]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18836]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION


Sunshine Act; Notice of Public Hearing

September 3, 2009.

Time and Date:  2 p.m., Thursday, September 3, 2009.

Place:  Offices of the Corporation, Twelfth Floor Board Room, 1100 New 
York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.

Status:  Hearing open to the Public at 2 p.m.

Purpose:  Public Hearing in conjunction with each meeting of OPIC's 
Board of Directors, to afford an opportunity for any person to present 
views regarding the activities of the Corporation.

Procedures:  Individuals wishing to address the hearing orally must 
provide advance notice to OPIC's Corporate Secretary no later than 5 
p.m. Thursday, August 27, 2009. The notice must include the 
individual's name, title, organization, address, and telephone number, 
and a concise summary of the subject matter to be presented.
    Oral presentations may not exceed ten (10) minutes. The time for 
individual presentations may be reduced proportionately, if necessary, 
to afford all participants who have submitted a timely request to 
participate an opportunity to be heard.
    Participants wishing to submit a written statement for the record 
must submit a copy of such statement to OPIC's Corporate Secretary no 
later than 5 p.m. Thursday, August 27, 2009. Such statement must be 
typewritten, double-spaced, and may not exceed twenty-five (25) pages.
    Upon receipt of the required notice, OPIC will prepare an agenda 
for the hearing identifying speakers, setting forth the subject on 
which each participant will speak, and the time allotted for each 
presentation. The agenda will be available at the hearing.
    A written summary of the hearing will be compiled, and such summary 
will be made available, upon written request to OPIC's Corporate 
Secretary, at the cost of reproduction.

Contact Person for Information:  Information on the hearing may be 
obtained from Connie M. Downs at (202) 336-8438, via facsimile at (202) 
218-0136, or via e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a5e6cacbcbccc08be1cad2cbd6e5cad5ccc68bc2cad3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c380acadadaaa6ed87acb4adb083acb3aaa0eda4acb5">[email protected]</span></a>.

     Dated: August 3, 2009.
Connie M. Downs,
OPIC Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-18836 Filed 8-3-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3210-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
June 24, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

KIM-HUONG T. HUNYHG, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00418-CV V.

HOUTEX CITY ALLSTAR REALTY, LLC D/B/A RE/MAX MEMORIAL 

REALTY AND PETER B. MERRITT, LLC, Appellees

________________________________

Today the Court heard appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

order signed by the court below on March 3, 2014. Having considered the motion 

and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that each party shall pay its costs by reason of this appeal.

We further order that mandate be issued immediately.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
1 of 3ELECTRONICALLY FILED MAY 08, 2020 CLERK OF SUPREME COURT2 of 33 of 3
From: Richard Parker [mailto:richardparkerdc@gmail.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 10:27 PM 

To: Andrew Delaski; Art Rosenfeld; Bob Smith; Brian Coffey; Caitlin Johnson; Carlos Siqueiros; Caskey, 

John; Chad Kennedy; Chris Bolduc; Chris Brown; Creevy, Jim; Dan Cohen; Daniel Young; Eduardo 

Robles; Edwards, Brenda; Eric Peterson; Freeman, Jeremiah; Gary Fernstrom; Greg Rosenquist; Jennifer 

Tiedeman; Jerry Schoen; Jim Raba; Joanna Mauer; John Cymbalsky; Katie Coughlin; Matthew Nardotti; 

Maxine Savitz; Meg Waltner; Michael Rivest; Millure, Dave; Phil Harter; Polinski, Raymond; Richard W. 

Parker; Rob Greeson; Robert Berman; Robert van Buskirk; Robin Roy; Ryan, Paul; Scott Beck; Steve 

Nadel; Steve Rosenstock; Ted Johnstone; Thomas Patzner; Thomas Petrosino; Tim Ballo; Vijay 

Tendulkar; Wes Patterson; Zhimei Luo 

Subject: Low Voltage Dry Type Analysis and Minutes 

Colleagues, 

Attached please find updated Engineering, LCC and NIA results for the low voltage transformer 

discussions on Thursday and Friday, along with the latest Manufacturing Impact Analysis. 

Also attached FYI are draft minutes for our LV meetings and telephone conference (except the 

October mtg). They are unofficial but I welcome any corrections to significant omissions or 

mistakes. 

These will all be posted to Sharepoint site as well. 

See you on Thursday if not before. 

All best, 

Richard Parker
----

Amendments to the Agreement between the EFTA States on the establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice

(2006/C 291/19)

The Agreements amending Protocol 4 to the Agreement between the EFTA States on the establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice signed in Brussels on 11 March 2005 and 10 March 2006 entered into force on 27 March 2006.

These Agreements and the updated consolidated version of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice have now been published on the EFTA Secretariat's website.

They can be found through the following links:

----
Order filed, March 16, 2020

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14

- 20

- 00057

- CV

____________

NATALIE Y. MOORE , Appellant

V.

MARIA BENITEZ , Appellee

On Appeal from the Co Civil Ct at Law No 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1146033



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due March 9, 2020

. See Tex. R. App.

P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record.

The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s rec ord has not

been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Alexandra L. McDaniel , the court reporter, to file the record in this

appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Bourliot , Hassan and Poissant.
#### Jennie Fillipone *v.*Corporation of the Church of the Immaculate Conception

King, C. J., Murphy, Alcorn, Comley and House, Js.

Argued June 3

decided June 16, 1964

*Eugene H. Kaplan,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

*718
      *Kevin T. Gormley,*with whom were *Gerald P. Dwyer*and, on the brief, *Martin E. Gormley,*for the appellee (defendant).

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff sued to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained as the result of a fall while she was descending the steps of the defendant church after attending mass.1 The fall was alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant. The defendant pleaded, as a special defense, that it was a charitable corporation without capital stock whose members derived no financial benefit from its operation. The plaintiff demurred, claiming that the defendant had failed to state a proper defense, and the demurrer was overruled. The plaintiff failed to plead further, and the court granted the defendant’s motion for a nonsuit.

The trial court did not err in overruling the demurrer. We adhere to our previous holdings that “a charitable corporation is not liable for injuries sustained by a beneficiary as a result of the negligent conduct of agents or servants of the corporation whom it has selected with due care.” *Bader*v. *United Orthodox Synagogue,*148 Conn. 449, 452, 172 A.2d 192; *McDermott*v. *St. Mary’s Hospital Corporation,*144 Conn. 417, 422, 133 A.2d 608.

There is no error.

During oral argument counsel stipulated that the demurrer had been argued and decided in the trial court as though the complaint had alleged that the plaintiff fell while leaving the church immediately after attending mass. Counsel requested that this appeal be decided on the same basis since the plaintiff’s objective is not to claim recovery under the rule of cases such as *Cohen*v. *General Hospital Society,*113 Conn. 188, 199, 154 A. 435, but to overthrow the defense of charitable immunity as it is now recognized in this state. We have decided to comply with the request and treat the case as it was treated by the parties and the court below. *Anselmo*v. *Cox,*135 Conn. 78, 79, 60 A.2d 767, cert. denied, 335 U.S. 859, 69 S. Ct. 132, 93 L. Ed. 405.