alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
o 

V(5 

U.S. Department :...'; t: ; V i/J^j;! 800 IndependenceAve S.W. 

of Transportation Washington. D.C. 20591 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

VIA REGULAR MAIL 

NOV 0 6 2009 Pauletta J. Brown, Esq. 

MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL, LLP 

1201N. Market Street 

P.O. Box 1347 

Wilmington, Delaware 19899-1347 

Joseph Michael Lamonaca, Esq. 

New Castle County Airport 

P.O. Box 10583 

Wilmington, Delaware 19850-0583 

RE: Aero Ways v. Delaware River & Bay Authority ~ FAA Docket No. 16-09-12 

Request for Extension of Time 

Dear Ms. Brown and Mr. Lamonaca: 

Via a motion dated October 30, 2009, counsel for the Delaware River & Bay Authority, requested an 

extension of time until January 13, 2010 to file the Authority's Answer in the above-referenced 

matter. In the motion, the Authority's counsel informed FAA that counsel for Aero Ways consented 

to the 60 day extension of time. 

Accordingly, the request for an extension is granted. The respondent's Answer is now due on 

Wednesday January 13, 2010. Complainant Aero Ways may file a Reply within ten days of the date 

of service of the Answer. 

Sincerely, 

Elizabeth Newman 

Attorney, Airports Law Branch 

cc: Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket 

ACO-lOO
Exhibit 10.22


AMENDMENT TO CHANGE IN CONTROL SEVERANCE AGREEMENT

 


AMENDMENT dated as of February 22, 2007 to Change in Control
Severance Agreement (the “Severance Agreement”) between Pfizer Inc.
(the “Company”)
and ______________ (the “Executive”).


WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive entered into the Severance Agreement; and 


WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive wish to amend the provisions of the Severance Agreement relating to the severance payment and to Performance-Contingent Share Awards; 


NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed as follows: 

	
1.     	
The first paragraph of Section 4(iv)(B) of the Severance Agreement is amended in its entirety to read as follows: “The Company shall pay you, on a date that is no later than the fifth day following the Date of
Termination, as severance pay to you a severance payment equal to 2.99 times the sum of (i) your full base salary and (ii) your annual incentive payment, in each case in effect at the time the Notice of Termination is given. In addition, the Company
shall pay or otherwise transfer to you, on a date that is no later than the fifth day following the Date of Termination, amounts and property that you are eligible to receive in respect of awards made to you prior to the Date of Termination pursuant
to the Company’s Performance- Contingent Share Awards (or any successor long-term compensation plan or award in effect as of the Date of Termination) that remain outstanding as of the Date of Termination, such amounts and property to be
calculated using the target number of shares, payments or other benefits that you could have received pursuant to all such outstanding awards.”

  
	 
	
2.	
The second paragraph of Section 4(iv)(B) of the Severance Agreement is deleted in its entirety.

  
	 
	
3.	
The Severance Agreement, as amended in Sections 1 and 2 hereof, shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.

  



1













IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Executive have voluntarily caused this Amendment to be signed as of the day and year first above written. 


PFIZER INC. 

	By	 
	 
	 	 Margaret M. Foran
  	 
	 	 Senior Vice President-Corporate Governance,
  	 
	 	 Associate General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
  	 
	 	 

  	 
	 	 

  	 
	 	 

  	 
	
    EXECUTIVE  	 
	 	  	 
	 
	 





2
# Department of Pesticide Regulation

Edmund G. Brown Jr.

Governor

1001 I Street • P.O. Box 4015 • Sacramento, California 95812-4015 • www.cdpr.ca.gov

A Department of the California Environmental Protection Agency

Printed on recycled paper, 100% post-consumer--processed chlorine-free. July 28, 2011

Mr. Andrew Steckel U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9

75 Hawthorne Street

Mail Code AIR-4 San Francisco, California 94105-3901

Dear Mr. Steckel:

California’s ozone State Implementation Plan for the federal Clean Air Act contains a pesticide element that requires the Department of Pesticid e Regulation (DPR) to develop and maintain an emission inventory to track volat ile organic compound (VOC) emissions from pesticides, and to reduce pesticide VOC emissions by specified levels in specified ozone no nattainment areas. In October 2009, the Air Resources Board s ubmitted DPR’s State Implementation Plan amendments and three sets of regulations for reducing VOC emissions from fumigants to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) . To assist U.S. EPA with its review, the

attached document contains more detailed in formation than previously submitted on DPR’s evaluation of fumigation methods, and informa tion on other potential pesticide VOC reduction measures. Additionally, this document includes more recent emission inventory data. This document is an update of the original versi on dated June 1, 2011, and includes information on the two additional sets of pesticide VOC regulations submitted to U.S. EPA this month.

Please contact me if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Original signed by

Randy Segawa Environmental Program Manager Environmental Monitoring Branch

916-324-4137

cc: see next pageMr. Andrew Steckel August 28, 2011 Page 2

cc: Mr. Charles M. Andrews, DPR Associate Director Marylou Verder-Carlos, DPR Assistant Director Ms. Polly Frenkel, DPR Chief Counsel John S. Sanders, Ph.D., DPR Environmental Program Manager Ms. Karen Magliano, Air Resources Board Mr. Kerry Drake, U.S. EPA Associate Director Ms. Nancy Levin, U.S. EPA
IV

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 46

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Firefighter Challenge.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 21, 1995

Mr. WELDON of Pennsylvania submitted the following concurrent resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the

Firefighter Challenge.

Whereas the Firefighter Challenge launches its fourth year of

competition involving over 4,000 firefighters from the

United States, Canada, and Australia;

Whereas the Firefighter Challenge will conduct over 23 competitions throughout the United States, Canada, and

Australia;

Whereas the Firefighter Challenge demonstrates the fitness

and readiness of career and volunteer firefighters to people of all ages;

Whereas the Firefighter Challenge pays tribute to the valor

and dedication of the American Fire Service in preserving

life and property; and
2

•HCON 46 IH

Whereas the Firefighter Challenge commences a day of activities in Washington, District of Columbia, honoring firefighters which culminates with the National Fire and

Emergency Services Dinner, hosted by the Congressional

Fire Services Institute: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),

3 SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR THE FIRE4 FIGHTER CHALLENGE.

5 The Congressional Fire Services Institute shall be

6 permitted to host a public event on the Capitol Grounds

7 during the period beginning on April 24, 1995, and ending

8 on April 27, 1995, or during such other period as the

9 Speaker of the House of Representatives and the Presi10 dent pro tempore of the Senate may jointly designate.

11 SEC. 2. CONDITIONS.

12 The event to be carried out under this resolution shall

13 be free of admission charge to the public and arranged

14 not to interfere with the needs of Congress, under condi15 tions to be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol and

16 the Capitol Hill Police Board; except that the Congres17 sional Fire Services Institute shall assume full responsibil18 ity for all expenses and liabilities incident to all activities

19 associated with the event.
3

•HCON 46 IH

1 SEC. 3. STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.

2 For the purposes of this resolution, the Congressional

3 Fire Services Institute is authorized to erect upon the

4 Capitol grounds, subject to the approval of the Architect

5 of the Capitol, such stage, sound amplification devices,

6 and other related structures and equipment as may be

7 required for the event to be carried out under this

8 resolution.

9 SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

10 The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Hill Po11 lice Board are authorized to make such additional ar12 rangements as may be required to carry out the event

13 under this resolution.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 73 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 73

   To amend Senate Resolution 62, agreed to February 28, 1991 (102d 
                               Congress).

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             February 24 (legislative day, January 5), 1993

    Mr. McCain (for himself and Mr. Inouye) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   To amend Senate Resolution 62, agreed to February 28, 1991 (102d 
                               Congress).

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. TRAINING EXPENSES.

    Section 21(c) of Senate Resolution 62, agreed to February 28, 1991 
(102d Congress), is amended by deleting the period at the end thereof 
and inserting in lieu thereof a comma and the following: ``and not to 
exceed $3,000 may be expended for the training of professional staff of 
such committee (under procedures specified by section 202(j) of such 
Act).''.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 132 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 132

 Relating to the extradition of Martin Pang from Brazil to the United 
                                States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1996

 Ms. Dunn of Washington submitted the following concurrent resolution; 
     which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Relating to the extradition of Martin Pang from Brazil to the United 
                                States.

Whereas it is alleged that Martin Pang started a warehouse fire in Seattle, 
        Washington on January 5, 1995, that killed four firefighters;
Whereas shortly thereafter Martin Pang fled to Brazil where he currently awaits 
        extradition to the United States on charges of arson and first degree 
        murder;
Whereas the extradition orders of the Government of Brazil state that Martin 
        Pang should stand trial in the United States only for arson and not for 
        first degree murder; and
Whereas nothing under international law prevents the Government of Brazil from 
        extraditing Martin Pang to the United States to stand trial for both 
        arson and first degree murder: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that, in the interests of 
furthering good relations between the United States and Brazil, the 
Government of Brazil should reverse its extradition orders relating to 
Martin Pang and allow Martin Pang to be extradited to the United States 
to stand trial for both arson and first degree murder.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 17 Engrossed in House (EH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 17

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, for the purposes of any constitutional amendment requiring a 
balanced budget, the appropriate committees of the House and the Senate 
shall report to their respective Houses implementing legislation to 
achieve a balanced budget without increasing the receipts or reducing 
the disbursements of the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust 
Fund and the Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund to achieve that 
goal.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 25, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.

104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 17

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 Relating to the treatment of Social Security under any constitutional 
                 amendment requiring a balanced budget.
```
#### Lawrence Simmons *v.*Rose Sorrentino et al.

*Raphael Korff,*in support of the petition.

Submitted May 14

decided May 26, 1964

The petition by the defendants for certification for appeal from the Appellate Division of the Circuit Court is denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet of CNL Income Fund VIII, Ltd. at March 31, 1998, and its statement of
income for the three months then ended and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the Form 10Q of CNL Income Fund VIII, Ltd. for the three months
ended March 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,811,192
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,612
<ALLOWANCES>                                    21,416
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      15,398,766
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,490,776
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,330,772
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  30,886,706
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,330,772
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               838,568
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   95,460
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                807,808
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            807,808
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   807,808
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Due to the nature of its industry, CNL Income Fund VIII, Ltd. has an
unclassified balance sheet; therefore, no values are shown above for current
assets and current liabilities.
</FN>
        



</TABLE>
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 265

To express the sense of the Senate concerning district council elections in

Hong Kong on September 18, 1994.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 21 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Mr. BROWN (for himself and Mr. DECONCINI) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

SEPTEMBER 29 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Reported by Mr. PELL without amendment

OCTOBER 5 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To express the sense of the Senate concerning district council

elections in Hong Kong on September 18, 1994.

Whereas the United States strongly supports the development

of effective, functioning democratic institutions worldwide;

Whereas the government of Hong Kong successfully conducted its first District Board elections on September

18th;

Whereas voter registration for the September 18th district

council elections in Hong Kong was higher than ever before;
2

SRES 265 ATS

Whereas the number of candidates running for District

Board positions is higher than in any previous election in

Hong Kong’s history;

Whereas Hong Kong has recently taken bold strides to increase democracy and expand the rule of law;

Whereas the rule of law is essential to the effective functioning of a market economy;

Whereas Hong Kong currently is one of the world’s leading

market economies;

Whereas recent electoral reforms in Hong Kong are consistent with the Joint Declaration and the Basic Law for

Hong Kong;

Whereas Hong Kong is an important friend and trading partner of the United States;

Whereas the people of the United States and Hong Kong

have long maintained close, friendly ties;

Whereas the stability of Hong Kong and the continuance of

its special status are of great importance to the United

States;

Whereas, to be effective, the rule of law must be firmly based

upon the consent of those it governs; and

Whereas one of the most effective methods to protect against

corruption is to ensure a government that is accountable

to those it governs: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate:

2 (1) Free and fair elections are an essential com3 ponent of a stable, democratic government in Hong

4 Kong that is free from corruption.
3

SRES 265 ATS

1 (2) The people of Hong Kong should be con2 gratulated for the recent success of the District

3 Board elections and for the progress of democratic

4 reforms that support the rule of law in Hong Kong.

5 (3) The United States should make every effort

6 to support the progress of democratic reforms in

7 Hong Kong and to encourage all parties to protect

8 these gains as the 1997 transition approaches.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights and the Federal Advisory Committee Act, that the New Hampshire Advisory Committee will convene a briefing meeting and planning meeting at 10 a.m. on Friday, August 14, 2009, at the Legislative Office Building, Room 201, Concord, New Hampshire 03301. The purpose of the briefing meeting is to hear presentations from experts about civil rights issues in the State. The purpose of the planning meeting is for the Committee to discuss possible topics for the Committee's future civil rights project.

                    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments; the comments must be received in the regional office by September 14, 2009. The address is the Eastern Regional Office, 624 Ninth Street, NW., Suite 740, Washington, DC 20425. Persons wishing to e-mail their comments, or who desire additional information should contact Alfreda Greene, Secretary, at 202-376-7533 or by e-mail to:                     *ero@usccr.gov.*

Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.

                    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced at the Eastern Regional Office, as they become available, both before and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site,                     *http://www.usccr.gov,*                     or to contact the Eastern Regional Office at the above e-mail or street address.                

The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

Dated in Washington, DC, July 29, 2009.

Peter Minarik,

Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.

[FR Doc. E9-18464 Filed 7-31-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00568-CV

In re Ryan O’Quinn Anders

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM FAYETTE COUNTY

M E M O R AN D U M O P I N I O N

We deny Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus challenging the transfer order and

dismiss, as moot, Relator’s request for emergency relief. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8.

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Field

Filed: September 8, 2014