alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TMO 10-K Exhibit 10.81


    Exhibit
      10.81

    


    


    


    Summary
      of Amendments to Certain Fisher Scientific International Inc. 

    Restricted
      Stock Unit Awards

    


    


    In
      connection with the closing of the merger of Thermo Electron Corporation (the
      predecessor to Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., also referred to as “the company”)
      and Fisher Scientific International Inc. (“Fisher”) on November 9, 2006, each
      existing stock unit award in respect of Fisher common stock was assumed by
      the
      company and converted into a stock unit award in respect of the number of shares
      of company common stock equal to the number of shares of Fisher common stock
      subject to the Fisher stock unit award, multiplied by the merger exchange ratio.
      Upon closing of the merger, each converted stock unit award had the same terms
      and conditions as were in effect immediately prior to the closing of the merger,
      except that performance conditions applicable to the vesting of the converted
      stock unit awards were deemed to have been satisfied upon closing of the merger,
      and the converted stock unit awards instead generally vest and are settled
      in
      three equal increments on the first three anniversaries of their original grant
      date, subject to the holder’s continued employment with the company as of each
      such vesting date, with certain exceptions. Alan Malus and Joseph Massaro were
      among the holders at the time of the closing of the merger of stock unit awards
      including performance conditions that were so
      converted.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 Certification Pursuant To
Rules 13a-14(a) And 15d-14(a) Under The Securities Exchange Act Of 1934, As Amended
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Biopure Corporation (the Registrant);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;4.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: September 14, 2007
    /s/ Francis H. MurphyFrancis H. MurphyChief Financial Officer
§ 1.6655(e)-1 Time and manner for making election under the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993. ( a ) *Description.* Section 6655(e)(2)(C), as added by section 13225 of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 (Pub. L. 103-66, 107 Stat. 486), allows a corporate taxpayer to make an annual election to use a different annualization period to determine annualized income for purposes of paying any required installment of estimated income tax for a taxable year beginning after December 31, 1993.
( b ) *Time and manner for making the election.* An election under section 6655(e)(2)(C) must be made on or before the date required for the payment of the first required installment for the taxable year. For a calendar or fiscal year corporation, Form 8842, Election to Use Different Annualization Periods for Corporate Estimated Tax, must be filed by the 15th day of the 4th month of the taxable year for which the election is to apply. Form 8842 must be filed with the Internal Revenue Service Center where the corporation files its income tax return.
( c ) *Revocability of election.* The election described in this section is irrevocable.
( d ) *Effective date.* The rules set forth in this section are effective December 12, 1996.
[T.D. 8688, 61 FR 65322, Dec. 12, 1996]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7261

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RAUL LABOY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Terrence W. Boyle,

Chief District Judge. (CR-91-87-4-BO; CA-97-69-4-BO)

Submitted: July 28, 2004 Decided: September 8, 2004

Before WILKINSON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raul LaBoy, Appellant Pro Se. Jane H. Jolly, OFFICE OF THE UNITED

STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*By order filed March 5, 2004, this appeal was placed in

abeyance for Jones v. Braxton, No. 03-6891. In view of our recent

decision in Reid v. Angelone, 369 F.3d 363 (4th Cir. 2004), we no

longer find it necessary to hold this case in abeyance for Jones.

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Raul LaBoy seeks to appeal the district court’s orders

dismissing his motion for a bill of review that sought to modify

his sentence and denying reconsideration. The district court

construed LaBoy’s pleading as a motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000), and dismissed it as successive, noting that LaBoy had not

obtained authorization from this court to file such a motion.* An

appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding

unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of

appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable

jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and

that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are

also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322,

338 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v.

Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently

reviewed the record and conclude that LaBoy has not made the

requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral
- 3 -

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-15-00012-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF K.D., A MINOR CHILD

On Appeal from the 307th District Court

Gregg County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-70-DR

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.
2

O RDER

This Court, upon review of the clerk’s record and reporter’s record filed in this case, has 

found that each contain the full name of the child involved in this appeal from a parental-rights 

termination. 

Rule 9.8, titled “Protection of Minor’s Identity in Parental-Rights Termination 

Cases . . . ,” states,

In an appeal or an original proceeding in an appellate court, arising out of a case 

in which the termination of parental rights was at issue:

(1) except for a docketing statement, in all papers submitted to the 

court, including all appendix items submitted with a brief, petition, or motion:

(A) a minor must be identified only by an alias unless the court 

orders otherwise; 

(B) the court may order that a minor’s parent or other family 

member be identified only by an alias if necessary to protect a minor’s 

identity, and

(C) all documents must be redacted accordingly . . . .

TEX. R. APP. P. 9.8(b)(1). 

Therefore, because the clerk’s record and the reporter’s record fail to protect the minor’s 

identity, we order the Clerk of this Court, or her appointee, pursuant to the inherent power of this 

Court, to seal the electronically filed reporter’s record and clerk’s record in this case. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: February 19, 2015
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc. (the “Company”) for the annual period ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael A. Ewald, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Sally F. Dornaus, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:

 
| 1. |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of   Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,   as amended; and     |
|----|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. |   | The information contained in the Report fairly   presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of   operations of the Company. |

 

Date: March 29, 2017

 

 
|   | /s/ Michael A. Ewald                        |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|   | Michael A. Ewald                            |
|   | Chief Executive Officer                     |
|   |                                        |
|   | Bain Capital Specialty   Finance, Inc. |
|   |                                        |
|   | /s/ Sally F. Dornaus                        |
|   | Sally F. Dornaus                            |
|   | Chief Financial Officer                     |
|   |                                        |
|   | Bain Capital Specialty   Finance, Inc. |

 

----
~O Sr4, ) UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

4 REGION IX “74 ~ 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105-3901 

## MAR 302016 Mr. Richard W. Corey, Executive Officer CaliforniaAir Resources Board Post Office Box 2815 Sacramento, California 95812 Dear Mr. Corey: On March 21, 2016, CARB submitted a revision to the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). We have reviewed the materials submitted with the following document and found thattheyfulfill the completeness criteria in 40 CFR Part 51, Appendix V.

This addresses the only revision in this submittal. In the coming months wewill reviewthe complete revision foraction pursuantto Clean AirAct section 110(k). Questions regarding ourcompleteness review should be directed to Arnold Lazarus at (415) 972-3024. Sincerely,

I•~i ahJordan 

# U Director, Air Division
Mr. DaveJohnson Air Pollution Control Officer El Dorado CountyAirQuality Management District330 Fair Placerville, California 95667-4100 Ms. Karen Magliano, Chief AirQuality Planning and Science Division, CaliforniaAir Resources Board, Post Office Box2815 Sacramento, California

Pnnted on Recycled Paper
#### § 1.6664-0 Table of contents.

This section lists the captions in §§ 1.6664-1 through 1.6664-4T.

## § 1.6664-1 Accuracy-related and fraud penalties; definitions and special rules.

(a) In general.

(b) Effective date.

(1) In general.

(2) Reasonable cause and good faith exception to section 6662 penalties.

(i) For returns due after September 1, 1995.

(ii) For returns filed after December 31, 2002.

(3) Qualified amended returns.

## § 1.6664-2 Underpayment.

(a) Underpayment defined.

(b) Amount of income tax imposed.

(c) Amount shown as the tax by the taxpayer on his return.

(1) Defined.

(2) Effect of qualified amended return.

(3) Qualified amended return defined.

(i) General rule.

(ii) Undisclosed listed transactions.

(4) Special rules.

(5) Examples.

(d) Amounts not so shown previously assessed (or collected without assessment).

(e) Rebates.

(f) Underpayments for certain carryback years not reduced by amount of carrybacks.

(g) Examples.

## § 1.6664-3 Ordering rules for determining the total amount of penalties imposed.

(a) In general.

(b) Order in which adjustments are taken into account.

(c) Manner in which unclaimed prepayment credits are allocated.

(d) Examples.

## § 1.6664-4 Reasonable cause and good faith exception to section 6662 penalties.

(a) In general.

(b) Facts and circumstances taken into account.

(1) In general.

(2) Examples.

(c) Reliance on opinion or advice.

(1) Fact and circumstances; minimum requirements.

(i) All facts and circumstances considered.

(ii) No unreasonable assumptions.

(iii) Reliance on the invalidity of a regulation.

(2) Advice defined.

(3) Cross-reference.

(d) Underpayments attributable to reportable transactions.

(e) Pass-through items.

(f) Special rules for substantial understatement penalty attributable to tax shelter items of corporations.

(1) In general; facts and circumstances.

(2) Reasonable cause based on legal justification.

(i) Minimum requirements.

(A) Authority requirement.

(B) Belief requirement.

(ii) Legal justification defined.

(3) Minimum requirements not dispositive.

(4) Other factors.

(g) Transactions between persons described in section 482 and net section 482 transfer price adjustments. [Reserved]

(h) Valuation misstatements of charitable deduction property.

(1) In general.

(2) Definitions.

(i) Charitable deduction property.

(ii) Qualified appraisal.

(iii) Qualified appraiser.

(3) Special rules.

## § 1.6664-4T Reasonable cause and good faith exception to section 6662 penalties

(a)-(c) [Reserved]

(d) Transactions between persons described in section 482 and net section 482 transfer price adjustments.

[T.D. 8381, 56 FR 67505, Dec. 31, 1991, as amended by T.D. 8519, 59 FR 4799, Feb. 2, 1994; T.D. 8617, 60 FR 45666, Sept. 1, 1995; T.D. 8656, 61 FR 4885, Feb. 9, 1996; T.D. 8790, 63 FR 66435, Dec. 2, 1998; T.D. 9109, 68 FR 75128, Dec. 30, 2003; T.D. 9309, 72 FR 903, Jan. 9, 2007]
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 2.9 (c) of the 2015-3 Servicing
Supplement dated as of September 2, 2015 (the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of GM Financial Automobile Leasing Trust 2015-3 (the
Trust), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the Servicer) and GMF Leasing LLC in
connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that
I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer. I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the
fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.



|    |  |                                         |  |                      
|--- |  | --------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Connie Coffey                       |  | Dated: March 15, 2018
|    |  | Connie Coffey                           |  |                      
|    |  | Executive Vice President, Corporate     |  |                      
|    |  | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |  |
Summary of Executive Compensation


  Exhibit 10.29
 
 Summary of Executive Compensation 
 
 The Compensation Committee
of the Board of Directors (the "Compensation Committee") of First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company"), after considering a market review of total compensation for certain executive officers expected to be named in the Company's
2007 Proxy Statement, determined the 2007 base salary for such officers, which is presented in the table below. 
 
  
 

	 Name and Principal Positions
	 2007 Base Salary
	 
	 Mr. John M. O'Meara, President and Chief Executive Officer
 
	 $678,000
	 
	 Mr. Thomas J. Schwartz, Group President Commercial Banking
 
	 $409,900
	 
	 Mr. Michael L. Scudder, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 
	 $355,100
	 
	 Mr. Mark M. Dietrich, Group Executive Vice President and Chief Operations Officer
 
	 $223,900
	 (1)

	 Ms. Janet M. Viano, Group President Retail Banking
 
	 $216,200
	 
	 Note: (1) Mr. Dietrich's compensation did not change for 2007 as he retired in first quarter 2007.
	 

  
 Each of these officers is also eligible to receive certain benefits and to participate in the Company's employee benefit plans applicable to
executive officers, including the Company's Savings and Profit Sharing Plan, Pension Plan, Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan, the Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan, and Nonqualified Retirement Plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of
such plans. These officers are also parties to Indemnification Agreements and Employment Agreements that, among other things, entitle them to payments upon severance or upon a change in control.
# Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali C NaN/2006

| | ISSN 1725-5198 |
| --- | --- |
| Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali
  ta' l-Unjoni Ewropea | C NaN |
| | |
| Edizzjoni bil-Malti | Informazzjoni u Avviżi | Volum 4929 ta' Diċembru 2006 |

ISSN 1725-5198

Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali

ta' l-Unjoni Ewropea

C NaN

Edizzjoni bil-Malti

Informazzjoni u Avviżi

Volum 4929 ta' Diċembru 2006

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Din il-Ħarġa Speċjali bil-Malti għandha n-Nru C 321 E. |

---

(1)   Din il-Ħarġa Speċjali bil-Malti għandha n-Nru C 321 E.

1

| MT | |
| --- | --- |

MT

---
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed February 22, 2018.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-17-01316-CV

ERIC DEWAYNE PRICE, Appellant

V.

JAMES SKOKAN & DIANA C. SKOKAN, AS TRUSTEES OF JAMES SKOKAN & 

DIANA C. SKOKAN 1989 INTER VIVOS TRUST, Appellees

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-08631

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Lang-Miers, Myers, and Boatright

Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers

Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. By postcard dated January 16, 2018, we notified 

appellant the time for filing his brief had expired. We directed appellant to file a brief and an 

extension motion within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to file a brief and an 

extension motion would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, 

appellant has not filed a brief, filed an extension motion, or otherwise corresponded with the Court 

regarding the status of this appeal.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), (c).

171316F.P05

/Elizabeth Lang-Miers/

ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

ERIC DEWAYNE PRICE, Appellant

No. 05-17-01316-CV V.

JAMES SKOKAN & DIANA C. 

SKOKAN, AS TRUSTEES OF JAMES 

SKOKAN & DIANA C. SKOKAN 1989 

INTER VIVOS TRUST, Appellees

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-08631.

Opinion delivered by Justice Lang-Miers. 

Justices Myers and Boatright participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellees JAMES SKOKAN & DIANA C. SKOKAN, AS 

TRUSTEES OF JAMES SKOKAN & DIANA C. SKOKAN 1989 INTER VIVOS TRUST 

recover their costs of this appeal from appellant ERIC DEWAYNE PRICE.

Judgment entered this 22nd day of February, 2018.
#### § 1.6013-3 Treatment of joint return after death of either spouse.

For purposes of section 21 (relating to change in rates during a taxable year), section 443 (relating to returns for a period of less than 12 months), and section 7851(a)(1)(A) (relating to the applicability of certain provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 and the Internal Revenue Code of 1939), where the husband and wife have different taxable years because of death of either spouse, the joint return shall be treated as if the taxable years of both ended on the date of the closing of the surviving spouse's taxable year. Thus, in cases where the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 otherwise would apply to the taxable year of the decedent spouse and the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 would apply to the taxable year of the surviving spouse, this provision makes the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 applicable to the taxable years of both spouses if a joint return is filed.
#### Howard B. Quinn, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles E. Larson and Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation, a Corporation, Defendants-Appellees.

Gen. No. 68-30.

Second District.

December 10, 1968.

Samuel E. Hirseh, of Chicago, for appellant;

McCarthy, Scheurich, Duffy and McCarthy, of Chicago, for appellees.

Opinion by

PRESIDING JUSTICE ABRAHAMSON.

Not to be published in full.
#### § 1.7701(l)-0 Table of contents.

This section lists captions that appear in §§ 1.7701(l)-1 and 1.7701(l)-3:

## § 1.7701(l)-1 Conduit financing arrangements.

## § 1.7701(l)-3 Recharacterizing financing arrangements involving fast-pay stock.

(a) Purpose and scope.

(b) Definitions.

(1) Fast-pay arrangement.

(2) Fast-pay stock.

(i) Defined.

(ii) Determination.

(3) Benefited stock.

(c) Recharacterization of certain fast-pay arrangements.

(1) Scope.

(2) Recharacterization.

(i) Relationship between benefited shareholders and fast-pay shareholders.

(ii) Relationship between benefited shareholders and corporation.

(iii) Relationship between fast-pay shareholders and corporation.

(3) Other rules.

(i) Character of the financing instruments.

(ii) Multiple types of benefited stock.

(iii) Transactions affecting benefited stock.

(A) Sale of benefited stock.

(B) Transactions other than sales.

(iv) Adjustment to basis for amounts accrued or paid in taxable years ending before February 27, 1997.

(d) Prohibition against affirmative use of recharacterization by taxpayers.

(e) Examples.

(f) Reporting requirement.

(1) Filing requirements.

(i) In general.

(ii) Controlled foreign corporation.

(iii) Foreign personal holding company.

(iv) Passive foreign investment company.

(2) Statement.

(g) Effective date.

(1) In general.

(2) Election to limit taxable income attributable to a recharacterized fast-pay arrangement for periods before April 1, 2000.

(i) Limit.

(ii) Adjustment and statement.

(iii) Examples.

(3) Rule to comply with this section.

(4) Reporting requirements.

[T.D. 8853, 65 FR 1313, Jan. 10, 2000]