alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali L 272/2020

| | ISSN 1977-074X |
| --- | --- |
| Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali
  tal-Unjoni Ewropea | L 272 |
| | |
| Edizzjoni bil-Malti | Leġiżlazzjoni | Volum 6319 ta' Awwissu 2020 |

ISSN 1977-074X

Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali

tal-Unjoni Ewropea

L 272

Edizzjoni bil-Malti

Leġiżlazzjoni

Volum 6319 ta' Awwissu 2020

---

| Werrej | | Rettifika | Paġna |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Rettifika għall-Adozzjoni definittiva (UE, Euratom) 2020/1078 tal-Baġit emendatorju Nru 4 tal-Unjoni Ewropea għas-sena finanzjarja 2020 ( ĠU L 254, 4.8.2020 ) | 1 |

Werrej

Rettifika

Paġna

*

Rettifika għall-Adozzjoni definittiva (UE, Euratom) 2020/1078 tal-Baġit emendatorju Nru 4 tal-Unjoni Ewropea għas-sena finanzjarja 2020 ( ĠU L 254, 4.8.2020 )

( ĠU L 254, 4.8.2020 )

1

| MT | L-Atti li t-titoli tagħhom huma stampati b'tipa ċara huma dawk li għandhom x'jaqsmu mal-maniġment ta' kuljum ta' materji agrikoli, u li ġeneralment huma validi għal perijodu limitat.
  It-titoli ta'l-atti l-oħra kollha huma stampati b'tipa skura u mmarkati b'asterisk quddiemhom. |
| --- | --- |

MT

L-Atti li t-titoli tagħhom huma stampati b'tipa ċara huma dawk li għandhom x'jaqsmu mal-maniġment ta' kuljum ta' materji agrikoli, u li ġeneralment huma validi għal perijodu limitat.

It-titoli ta'l-atti l-oħra kollha huma stampati b'tipa skura u mmarkati b'asterisk quddiemhom.

---

Rettifika

| 19.8.2020 | MT | Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea | L 272/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.8.2020

MT

Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea

L 272/1

---

Rettifika għall-Adozzjoni definittiva (UE, Euratom) 2020/1078 tal-Baġit emendatorju Nru 4 tal-Unjoni Ewropea għas-sena finanzjarja 2020

(
  Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea L 254 tal-4 ta’ Awwissu 2020
  )

F’paġna 36, ringiela “Total” fil-kolonna “Baġit 2020 – Pagamenti”:

għal:

“
  167 248 223 575
  ”;

aqra:

“
  150 948 403 832
  ”.

F’paġna 36, ringiela “Total” fil-kolonna “Ammont ġdid – Pagamenti”:

għal:

għal

“
  167 520 721 783
  ”;

aqra:

aqra

“
  151 220 902 040
  ”.

---
IV

House Calendar No. 61

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 38

[Report No. 104–150]

Authorizing the use of the Capitol grounds for the Greater Washington

Soap Box Derby.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 10, 1995

Mr. HOYER (for himself, Mrs. MORELLA, Mr. WYNN, Ms. NORTON, Mr.

WOLF, and Mr. MORAN) submitted the following concurrent resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

JUNE 21, 1995

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of the Capitol grounds for the Greater

Washington Soap Box Derby.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),
2

HCON 38 RH

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF SOAP BOX DERBY RACES

2 ON CAPITOL GROUNDS.

3 The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby Associa4 tion (hereinafter in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘As5 sociation’’) shall be permitted to sponsor a public event,

6 soap box derby races, on the Capitol grounds on July 15,

7 1995, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House

8 of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the

9 Senate may jointly designate.

10 SEC. 2. CONDITIONS.

11 The event to be carried out under this resolution shall

12 be free of admission charge to the public and arranged

13 not to interfere with the needs of Congress, under condi14 tions to be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol and

15 the Capitol Police Board; except that the Association shall

16 assume full responsibility for all expenses and liabilities

17 incident to all activities associated with the event.

18 SEC. 3. STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.

19 For the purposes of this resolution, the Association

20 is authorized to erect upon the Capitol grounds, subject

21 to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, such stage,

22 sound amplification devices, and other related structures

23 and equipment as may be required for the event to be car24 ried out under this resolution.
3

HCON 38 RH

1 SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

2 The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police

3 Board are authorized to make any such additional ar4 rangements that may be required to carry out the event

5 under this resolution.
House Calendar No. 61

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 38

[Report No. 104–150]

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of the Capitol grounds for the

Greater Washington Soap Box Derby.

JUNE 21, 1995

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.6103(m)-1 Disclosure of taxpayer identity information. ( a ) *Definition.* For purposes of applying the provisions of section 6103(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, the term *agent* includes a contractor.
( b ) *Effective date.* This section is applicable January 6, 2004.
[T.D. 9111, 69 FR 507, Jan. 6, 2004]
§ 1.6164-4 Payment of remainder of tax where extension relates to only part of the tax. ( a ) *Time for payment.* If an extension of time relates to only part of the tax, the time for payment of the remainder of the tax shall be considered to be the dates on which payments would have been required if such remainder had been the tax and the taxpayer had elected to pay the tax in installments as provided in section 6152(a).
( b ) *Example.* The provisions of this section may be illustrated by the following example:
Example. Corporation X, which keeps its books and makes its tax returns on the calendar year basis, filed its income tax return for 1956 on March 15, 1957. The corporation showed a tax of $1,000 on its return and paid 50 percent of such tax, or $500 on March 15, 1957. On June 3, 1957, Corporation X, pursuant to the provisions of section 6164, extended the time for payment of $400 of such tax. The remainder of the tax the time for payment of which was not so extended, i.e., $600, is to be considered the tax for purposes of determining when it is to be paid. The remainder is considered to be due on the dates on which payment would have been required if such remainder had been the tax. Since the taxable year ended on December 31, 1956, the tax is payable in two equal installments of $300 each on March 15, 1957, and June 17, 1957. The taxpayer, having paid $500 on March 15, 1957, will have $100 to pay on June 17, 1957.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 150 (Thursday, August 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 39379]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18782]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Assistance 
Center Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer 
Assistance Center Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy 
Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, September 22, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Smiley at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-
231-2360.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Assistance 
Center Committee will be held Tuesday, September 22, 2009, at 1 p.m. 
Central Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make 
oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to 
limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be 
made with Ellen Smiley. For more information please contact Ms. Smiley 
at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-231-2360, or write TAP Office Stop 1006MIL, 
211 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221, or post comments 
to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: July 30, 2009.
Shawn F. Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E9-18782 Filed 8-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                Exhibit 11

POTASH CORPORATION OF SASKATCHEWAN INC.
COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
FOR THE PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30
(Figures and amounts expressed in thousands, except per share and per option
amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       YTD-1996        YTD-1995        Q3-1996         Q3-1995
                                                       --------        --------        -------         -------
<S>  <C>                                               <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>
A    Net Income as reported, Canadian GAAP              162,848         122,296         46,772          23,077
B    Items adjusting net income                          (5,753)              0         (1,435)              0
C    Net income, US GAAP (A+B)                          157,095         122,296         45,337          23,077

D    Weighted average number of shares outstanding       45,525          43,202         45,549          43,567

E    Options outstanding to purchase equivalent shares    1,271             926          1,271             926

F    Average exercise price per option                    43.55           34.74          43.55           34.74

G    Average market price per share                       68.57           59.68          69.87            48.8

H    Period end market price per share                    66.25           62.25          73.13           62.25

I    Rate of Return available on option proceeds           0.05            0.05           0.05            0.05


CANADIAN GAAP

     Basic earnings per share (A/D)                        3.58            2.83           1.03            0.53

     Fully diluted earnings per share
J    Imputed earnings on option proceeds (E*F*I)          2,767           1,609          2,767           1,609

     Fully diluted earnings per share ((A+J)/(D+E))        3.54            2.81           1.06            0.55


UNITED STATES GAAP

     Primary earnings per share
K    Net additional shares issuable (E-(E*F/G))             464             387            479             267

     Primary earnings per share (C/(D+K))                  3.42            2.81           0.98            0.53

     Fully diluted earnings per share
L    Net additional shares issuable (E-(E*F/H))             435             409            514             409

     Fully diluted earnings per share (C/(D+L))            3.42            2.80           0.98            0.52

     D+K Weighted average shares for US GAAP             45,989          43,589         46,028          43,834
</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

FEDNEL DAVID,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-2689

[May 16, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; John S. Kastrenakes, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

2016CF008106AMB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Jeffrey Anderson, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melynda L. 

Melear, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., MAY and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

DUSTIN PARRISH,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D23-2539

April 12, 2024

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County, Laura Ward, Judge.

Dustin Parrish, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, LUCAS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
§ 1.853-1 Foreign tax credit allowed to shareholders. ( a ) *In general.* Under section 853, a regulated investment company, meeting the requirements set forth in section 853(a) and paragraph (b) of this section, may make an election with respect to the income, war-profits, and excess profits taxes described in section 901(b)(1) which it pays to foreign countries or possessions of the United States during the taxable year, including such taxes as are deemed paid by it under the provisions of any income tax convention to which the United States is a party. If an election is made, the shareholders of the regulated investment company shall apply their proportionate share of such foreign taxes paid, or deemed to have been paid by it pursuant to any income tax convention, as either a credit (under section 901) or as a deduction (under section 164(a)) as provided by section 853(b)(2) and paragraph (b) of § 1.853-2. The election is not applicable with respect to taxes deemed to have been paid under section 902 (relating to the credit allowed to corporate stockholders of a foreign corporation for taxes paid by such foreign corporation). In addition, the election is not applicable to any tax with respect to which the regulated investment company is not allowed a credit by reason of any provision of the Internal Revenue Code other than section 853(b)(1), including, but not limited to, section 901(j), section 901(k), or section 901(l).
( b ) *Requirements.* To qualify for the election provided in section 853(a), a regulated investment company ( 1 ) must have more than 50 percent of the value of its total assets, at the close of the taxable year for which the election is made, invested in stocks and securities of foreign corporations, and
( 2 ) must also, for that year, comply with the requirements prescribed in section 852(a) and paragraph (a) of § 1.852-1. The term “value”, for purposes of the first requirement, is defined in section 851(c)(4). For the definition of foreign corporation, see section 7701(a).
( c ) *Effective/applicability date.* The final sentence of paragraph (a) of this section is applicable for RIC taxable years ending on or after December 31, 2007.
[T.D. 6500, 25 FR 11910, Nov. 26, 1960; 25 FR 14021, Dec. 31, 1960, as amended by T.D. 9357, 72 FR 48553, Aug. 24, 2007]
§ 20.6011-1 General requirement of return, statement, or list. ( a ) *General rule.* Every person made liable for any tax imposed by subtitle B of the Code shall make such returns or statements as are required by the regulations in this part. The return or statement shall include therein the information required by the applicable regulations or forms.
( b ) *Use of prescribed forms.* Copies of the forms prescribed by §§ 20.6018-1 and 20.6036-1 may be obtained from district directors. The fact that an executor has not been furnished with copies of these forms will not excuse him from making a return or, if applicable, from filing a preliminary notice. Application for a form shall be made to the district director in ample time for the executor to have the form prepared, verified, and filed with the appropriate internal revenue office on or before the date prescribed for the filing thereof (see §§ 20.6071-1 and 20.6075-1). The executor shall carefully prepare the return and, if applicable, the preliminary notice so as to set forth fully and clearly the data called for therein. A return or, if applicable, a preliminary notice which has not been so prepared will not be accepted as meeting the requirements of §§ 20.6018-1 through 20.6018-4, and § 20.6036-1.
[T.D. 6296, 23 FR 4529, June 24, 1958, as amended by T.D. 7238, 37 FR 28720, Dec. 29, 1972]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MARCUS NEAL PALMER,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 326 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 13th day of December, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED

.
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 64

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 10 (legislative day, MAY 1), 1995

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the 1995 Special Olympics Torch Relay to be

run through the Capitol Grounds.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF RUNNING OF SPECIAL

4 OLYMPICS TORCH RELAY THROUGH CAPITOL

5 GROUNDS.

6 On May 19, 1995, or on such other date as the

7 Speaker of the House of Representatives and the Presi8 dent pro tempore of the Senate may jointly designate, the

9 1995 Special Olympics Torch Relay may be run through

10 the Capitol Grounds, as part of the journey of the Special

11 Olympics torch to the District of Columbia Special Olym12 pics summer games at Gallaudet University in the District

13 of Columbia.
2

HCON 64 RDS

1 SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

2 The Capitol Police Board shall take such action as

3 may be necessary to carry out section 1.

4 SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARA5 TIONS.

6 The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions

7 for physical preparations for the event authorized by

8 section 1.

Passed the House of Representatives May 9, 1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DONNA LYNN BRADLEY,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

CAREMARK RX LLC,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 13-15677

D.C. No. 2:11-cv-00980-SRB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Susan R. Bolton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 18, 2014** 

Before: LEAVY, FISHER, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Donna Lynn Bradley appeals pro se from the district court’s summary

judgment in her employment action alleging age and sex discrimination, and

retaliation, in connection with her termination. We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Hawn v. Exec. Jet Mgmt., Inc., 615 F.3d

FILED

DEC 4 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
1151, 1155 (9th Cir. 2010). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Bradley’s age

discrimination claim because Bradley failed to raise a genuine dispute of material

fact as to whether she was performing her job satisfactorily, or whether she was

replaced by a substantially younger employee with equal or inferior qualifications. 

See Sheppard v. David Evans & Assocs., 694 F.3d 1045, 1049 (9th Cir. 2012)

(setting forth elements of prima facie case of discrimination under the Age

Discrimination in Employment Act). 

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Bradley’s sex

discrimination claim because Bradley failed to raise a triable dispute as to whether

she was qualified for the job, or whether similarly situated men were treated more

favorably. See Villiarimo v. Aloha Island Air, Inc., 281 F.3d 1054, 1062 (9th Cir.

2002) (setting forth elements of prima facie case of sex discrimination under Title

VII).

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Bradley’s

retaliation claim because Bradley failed to raise a triable dispute as to whether

there was a causal link between any protected activity and her termination. See id.

at 1064 (setting forth elements of prima facie case of retaliation under Title VII).

AFFIRMED.

2 13-15677
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Irma Ofelia PEREA-SANTANA, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 01-50670.

D.C. No. CR-01-01941-JTM.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*927Submitted June 10, 2002.*

Decided June 19, 2002.

Before RYMER, T.G. NELSON and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Irma Ofelia Perea-Santana appeals her conviction after her guilty plea to one count of importing marijuana. Her argument challenging the constitutionality of 21 U.S.C. § 841 is foreclosed by *United States v. Buckland,*289 F.3d 558, -, -, slip op. 6645, 6650 (9th Cir.2002) (en banc), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 2314,-L.Ed.2d-(2002). Her challenge to 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960 is foreclosed by *United States v. Varela-Rivera,*279 F.3d 1174, 1175 n. 1 (9th Cir.2002) and *United States v. Mendoza-Paz,*286 F.3d 1104 (9th Cir.2002). Finally, this court has also rejected her claim that the government was required to prove that she knew the quantity and type of the drugs involved in the offense. *United States v. Carranza,*289 F.3d 634 (9th Cir.2002).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.6155-1 Payment on notice and demand.

Upon receipt of notice and demand from the district director (including the Director of International Operations) or the director of the regional service center, there shall be paid at the place and time stated in such notice the amount of any tax (including any interest, additional amounts, additions to the tax, and assessable penalties) stated in such notice and demand.