alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Uradni list L 272/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0804 |
| --- | --- |
| Uradni list
  Evropske unije | L 272 |
| | |
| Slovenska izdaja | Zakonodaja | Letnik 6319. avgust 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0804

Uradni list

Evropske unije

L 272

Slovenska izdaja

Zakonodaja

Letnik 6319. avgust 2020

---

| Vsebina | | Popravki | Stran |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Popravek Dokončnega sprejetja (EU, Euratom) 2020/1078 spremembe proračuna Evropske unije št. 4 za proračunsko leto 2020 ( UL L 254 4.8.2020 ) | 1 |

Vsebina

Popravki

Stran

*

Popravek Dokončnega sprejetja (EU, Euratom) 2020/1078 spremembe proračuna Evropske unije št. 4 za proračunsko leto 2020 ( UL L 254 4.8.2020 )

( UL L 254 4.8.2020 )

1

| SL | Akti z rahlo natisnjenimi naslovi so tisti, ki se nanašajo na dnevno upravljanje kmetijskih zadev in so splošno veljavni za omejeno obdobje.
  Naslovi vseh drugih aktov so v mastnem tisku in pred njimi stoji zvezdica. |
| --- | --- |

SL

Akti z rahlo natisnjenimi naslovi so tisti, ki se nanašajo na dnevno upravljanje kmetijskih zadev in so splošno veljavni za omejeno obdobje.

Naslovi vseh drugih aktov so v mastnem tisku in pred njimi stoji zvezdica.

---

Popravki

| 19.8.2020 | SL | Uradni list Evropske unije | L 272/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.8.2020

SL

Uradni list Evropske unije

L 272/1

---

Popravek Dokončnega sprejetja (EU, Euratom) 2020/1078 spremembe proračuna Evropske unije št. 4 za proračunsko leto 2020

(
  Uradni list Evropske unije L 254 z dne 4. avgusta 2020
  )

Stran 36, vrstica „Skupaj“ v stolpcu „Proračun 2020 – Plačila“:

besedilo:

„
  167 248 223 575
  “

se glasi:

„
  150 948 403 832
  “.

Stran 36, vrstica „Skupaj“ v stolpcu „Nov znesek – Plačila“:

besedilo:

besedilo

„
  167 520 721 783
  “

se glasi:

se glasi

„
  151 220 902 040
  “.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 177 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 177

  Informing the President of the United States that a quorum of each 
                          House is assembled.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 25, 1994

    Mr. Mitchell (for himself and Mr. Dole) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Informing the President of the United States that a quorum of each 
                          House is assembled.

    Resolved, That a committee consisting of two Senators be appointed 
to join such committee as may be appointed by the House of 
Representatives to wait upon the President of the United States and 
inform him that a quorum of each House is assembled and that the 
Congress is ready to receive any communication he may be pleased to 
make.

                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 6715]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Leonardo da Vinci: Hand of the Genius,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the High Museum of Art, Atlanta, GA, from on or about October 6, 2009, until on or about February 21, 2010; at the J. Paul Getty Museum, Los Angeles, CA, from on or about March 23 to on or about June 20, 2010; and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/453-8048). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW. Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

Dated: July 24, 2009.

C. Miller Crouch,

Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. E9-18333 Filed 7-30-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```

[Federal Register: July 8, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 130)]
[Notices]               
[Page 39204-39205]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr08jy10-37]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT

 
Notice of Public Information Collections Being Reviewed by the 
U.S. Agency for International Development; Comments Requested

SUMMARY: U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) is making 
efforts to reduce the paperwork burden. USAID invites the general 
public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment 
on the following proposed and/or continuing information collections, as 
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act for 1995. Comments are 
requested concerning: (a) Whether the proposed or continuing

[[Page 39205]]

collections of information are necessary for the proper performance of 
the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall 
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the burden estimates; (c) 
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information 
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of 
information on the respondents, including the use of automated 
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.

DATES: Submit comments on or before September 7, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Send comments via e-mail at jjtaylor@usaid.gov or mail 
comments to: Jacqueline Taylor, Office of Acquisition and Assistance, 
United States Agency for International Development, Ronald Reagan 
Building, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20523, (202) 
712-0492.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Johnson, Bureau for 
Management, Office of Administrative Services, Information and Records 
Division, U.S. Agency for International Development, Room 2.07-106, 
RRB, Washington, DC 20523, (202) 712-1365 or via e-mail at 
bjohnson@usaid.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    OMB No: OMB 0412-0565.
    Form No.: N/A.
    Title: Applicant's Certification that it Does Not Support Terrorist 
Organizations or Individuals.
    Type of Review: Renewal of Information Collection.
    Purpose: The United States Agency for International Development 
(USAID) needs to require applicants for assistance to certify that it 
does not and will not engage in financial transactions with, and does 
not and will not provide material support and resources to individuals 
or organizations that engage in terrorism. The purpose of this 
requirement is to assure that USAID does not directly provide support 
to such organizations or individuals, and to assure that recipients are 
aware of these requirements when it considers individuals or 
organizations are subrecipients.
    Annual Reporting Burden:
    Respondents: 2,000.
    Total Annual Responses: 4,000.
    Total Annual Hours Requested: 1,500 hours.

    Dated: June 28, 2010.
Roberto Miranda,
Director, Office of Administrative Services, Bureau for Management.
[FR Doc. 2010-16466 Filed 7-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6116-02-M
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

November 1, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00344

- CV

John B. URBAHNS
, Appellant

v.

LSREF2 COBALT (TX), LLC, Appellee

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2017CI22479 Honorable Richard Price, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

After we granted Appellee ’ s first motion for an extension of time to file the brief, Appellee ’ s brief wa s due on Octo ber 31 , 201 8

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(b) , (d)

. On the extended due date, Appellee filed a second motion for an extension of time to file the brief until November 1 6 , 201 8 , for a total extension of twenty

- three days

. S ee id. R. 10.5(b)

. Appellee ’ s motion is GRANTED. Appellee ’ s brief is due on Novem ber 1 6 , 201 8

.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Al varez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 1st day of November, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE
, Clerk of Court
IV

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 182

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the need for the President

to seek the Senate’s advice and consent for ratification of the 1994

Inter-American Convention on the Prevention, Punishment, and Eradication of Violence Against Women.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 6, 1996

Mr. TORRES (for himself, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Ms. ESHOO, Mrs. MINK of

Hawaii, Mr. BECERRA, Mrs. CLAYTON, Mr. PORTER, Mrs. ROUKEMA,

and Mr. HORN) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the need

for the President to seek the Senate’s advice and consent

for ratification of the 1994 Inter-American Convention

on the Prevention, Punishment, and Eradication of Violence Against Women.

Whereas the 1994 Inter-American Convention on the Prevention, Punishment, and Eradication of Violence Against

Women (hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Convention’’) was

adopted by the General Assembly of the Organization of

American States in June, 1994, in Belem do Para,

Brazil;
2

•HCON 182 IH

Whereas the United States was a participant in the discussions and present at the General Assembly when the Convention was adopted;

Whereas violence against women constitutes a violation of

their human rights and fundamental freedoms;

Whereas violence against women refers to any act or conduct,

based on gender, that causes death or physical, sexual, or

psychological harm or suffering to women;

Whereas violence against women is an offense against human

dignity and a manifestation of the historically unequal

power relations between women and men;

Whereas violence against women pervades every sector of society regardless of class, race, ethnic group, income, culture, level of education,

Whereas elimination of violence against women is essential to

ensure the full and equal participation of women in society;

Whereas adoption of the Convention within the framework of

the Organization of American States is a positive contribution in protecting the rights of women and eliminating violence against them; and

Whereas by ratifying and acceding to the Convention the

United States will become a more credible proponent of

the rights of women and a more effective advocate in encouraging other countries to protect the human rights

and fundamental freedoms of women: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 President should promptly seek the advice and consent of
3

•HCON 182 IH

1 the Senate to ratification of the 1994 Inter-American Con2 vention on the Prevention, Punishment and Eradication

3 of Violence Against Women.

Æ
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

The regulations contained in this part have been recodified in 46 CFR part 287.

#### § 2.1-11 Time deposits.

Deposits in the construction reserve fund not invested in securities may be placed in time deposits when, in the judgment of the taxpayer, it is desirable and feasible so to do. The taxpayer shall promptly advise the Administration of any time deposit arrangements made with the depository. The Administration reserves the right at any time to require the termination or modification of any such arrangements. With prior approval of the Administration a time deposit may be made in a depository other than the one with which the construction reserve fund is established.
§ 20.2106-1 Estates of nonresidents not citizens; taxable estate; deductions in general. ( a ) The taxable estate of a nonresident who was not a citizen of the United States at the time of his death is determined by adding the value of that part of his gross estate which, at the time of his death, is situated in the United States and, in the case of an estate to which section 2107 (relating to expatriation to avoid tax) applies, any amounts includible in his gross estate under section 2107(b), and then subtracting from the sum thereof the total amount of the following deductions: ( 1 ) The deductions allowed in the case of estates of decedents who were citizens or residents of the United States under sections 2053 and 2054 (see §§ 20.2053-1 through 20.2053-9 and § 20.2054-1) for expenses, indebtedness and taxes, and for losses, to the extent provided in § 20.2106-2.
( 2 ) A deduction computed in the same manner as the one allowed under section 2055 (see §§ 20.2055-1 through 20.2055-5) for charitable, etc., transfers, except— ( i ) That the deduction is allowed only for transfers to corporations and associations created or organized in the United States, and to trustees for use within the United States, and
( ii ) That the provisions contained in paragraph (c)(2) of § 20.2055-2 relating to termination of a power to consume are not applicable.
( 3 ) Subject to the special rules set forth at § 20.2056A-1(c), the amount which would be deductible with respect to property situated in the United States at the time of the decedent's death under the principles of section 2056. Thus, if the surviving spouse of the decedent is a citizen of the United States at the time of the decedent's death, a marital deduction is allowed with respect to the estate of the decedent if all other applicable requirements of section 2056 are satisfied. If the surviving spouse of the decedent is not a citizen of the United States at the time of the decedent's death, the provisions of section 2056, including specifically the provisions of section 2056(d) and (unless section 2056(d)(4) applies) the provisions of section 2056A (QDOTs) must be satisfied.
( b ) Section 2106(b) provides that no deduction is allowed under paragraph (a) (1) or (2) of this section unless the executor discloses in the estate tax return the value of that part of the gross estate not situated in the United States. See § 20.2105-1. Such part must be valued as of the date of the decedent's death, or if the alternate valuation method under section 2032 is elected, as of the applicable valuation date.
[T.D. 6296, 23 FR 5429, June 24, 1958, as amended by T.D. 6526, 26 FR 417, Jan. 19, 1961; T.D. 7296, 38 FR 34197, Dec. 12, 1973; T.D. 7318, 39 FR 25457, July 11, 1974; T.D. 8612, 60 FR 43552, Aug. 22, 1995]
#### IN THE MATTER OF THE UNIFICATION OF THE BAR OF ARKANSAS

5-5116

448 S. W. 2d 948

Opinion delivered January 12, 1970

*Bruce Bullion, Nathan Gordon, Richard Mays, W. S. Mitchell, J. L. Shaver, Sr.*and *Henry Woods,*for petitioners.

PER CURIAM.

'This is the second attempt by the *927Arkansas Bar Association to obtain an order of this court integrating or unifying the bar of Arkansas. In the earlier instance petitions for integration, signed by a substantial majority of the actively practicing lawyers in the State, were filed. After the announcement of our preliminary order granting the petition the Bar Association reversed its position in the matter and adopted a resolution opposing integration. A poll then taken by the court resulted in a vote of 489 for integration and 1,003 against ,it. We therefore rescinded our order and denied the petitions. *In the Matter of the Integration of the Bar,*222 Ark. 35, 259 S. W. 2d 144 (1953).

In substance the earlier procedure was followed in the present instance. The executive committee of the Bar Association first filed a petition asking for an order approving the unification of the bar. A proposed constitution and by-laws were also submitted. Those documents, together with briefs for and against the proposal, were mailed by the Bar Association to all licensed members of our bar.

Thereafter we again took a poll of the lawyers. Of about 2,600 licensed attorneys there were 1,714 valid votes, as follows:

> Attorney’s Category For Against Total

> Active Resident Lawyer 610 597 1,207

> Active Nonresident Lawyer 9 6 15

> Inactive Resident Lawyer 95 183 278

> Inactive Nonresident Lawyer 111 103 214

> 825 889 1,714

It will be seen that slightly less than a majority of the votes were cast in favor of unification and that those favoring the proposal constituted only about 32% of the 2,600 licensed lawyers. Regardless of the merits of the proposal, about which we need express no opinion, we *928are unanimously of the view that the organization would have little chance of success with such a small part of the bar sufficiently interested in it to cast a favorable vote. The petition is therefore denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1995
<CASH>                                      23,105,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              216,613,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                11,030,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           255,078,000
<PP&E>                                      43,254,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              33,392,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             345,847,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      172,017,000
<BONDS>                                    120,096,000<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          213,000
<PREFERRED>                                 19,770,000
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,431,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               345,847,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           781,127,000<F2>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              312,704,000<F3>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,440,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          11,943,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,015,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,257,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,634,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,634,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
<FN>
<F1>Excludes current portion of bonds, mortgages, and similar debt.
<F2>Represents gross revenue which includes costs of certain services subcontracted
to third parties and other reimbursable direct project costs, such as materials
procured by the Company on behalf of its customers.
<F3>Excludes subcontract and direct material costs of $413,257,000.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.51

Transaction Bonus Summary

The Companys Board of Directors has determined that it is appropriate to
provide bonuses (collectively, the Bonus Pool) to certain executive officers
of the Company for their assistance in effectuating a strategic transaction for
the Company. The Bonus Pool will accrue at an amount equal to:



| | (a) |  | 0.5% times the amount of consideration that a
purchaser will pay to complete the transaction (the
Purchase Price) up to Cdn. $100 million; plus
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (b) |  | 1.5% times the amount that the Purchase Price
exceeds Cdn. $100 million.                                                                         

Keith J. Carlson, the Companys President and Chief Executive Officer, will be
entitled to an amount equal to 50% of the Bonus Pool, with the remaining 50% of
the Bonus Pool to be divided among certain executive officers of the Company
which the Companys Board of Directors deem had important roles in the
consummation of the transaction. Any bonus payable to the Companys executive
officers from the Bonus Pool is contingent on the consummation of the
transaction and upon such executive officers satisfaction of all their
respective obligations before and up to three months after the closing if
required by a potential buyer.

If the Companys investment management business is acquired by Mackenzie
Financial Corporation, the value of this business will not be included in the
Bonus Pool. If the advisory portion of that business is sold, the value
received for that operation will be included in the Bonus Pool. The value of
any cash or investments repatriated to Mackenzie Financial Corporation will be
included in the calculation of the Bonus Pool.

If the Company absorbs any ongoing costs as a result of a transaction, such as
lease termination expenses, such costs will generally be deducted from the
sales proceeds for purposes of calculating the Bonus Pool.

This Bonus Pool will be payable solely in connection with the completion of a
transaction and will not be included for purposes of calculating constructive
or other dismissal related payments.