alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 31

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the United States should support

the efforts of Greece, in its negotiations with the Former Yugoslav

Republic of Macedonia, to find a solution which promotes a solid, cooperative relationship between these two neighboring countries and that the

United States should not establish formal diplomatic relations with the

Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia until this relationship is established.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 16, 1995

Mrs. MALONEY (for herself and Mr. BILIRAKIS) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International

Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the United States

should support the efforts of Greece, in its negotiations

with the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, to

find a solution which promotes a solid, cooperative relationship between these two neighboring countries and

that the United States should not establish formal diplomatic relations with the Former Yugoslav Republic of

Macedonia until this relationship is established.

Whereas negotiations under the auspices of the United Nations are currently being conducted pertaining to the
2

•HCON 31 IH

name and to other national symbols of the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia;

Whereas all historical and archaeological evidence demonstrates that the ancient Macedonians were Greeks and

Macedonia is a Greek name in origin;

Whereas in 1944 the name of the territory of the Former

Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia was changed from

Vardar Banovina to Macedonia as part of the campaign

by Yugoslavia’s Communist dictator Tito to gain control

of the Greek province of Macedonia and the United

States opposed the use of the name Macedonia by Tito

at that time;

Whereas Greece was a valuable ally of the United States during World War II and during the cold war;

Whereas Greece continues to be a valuable ally of the United

States in the Eastern Mediterranean as demonstrated by

its coalition role in the Persian Gulf conflict;

Whereas Greece has no claim on the territory of the Former

Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and has repeatedly

reaffirmed the inviolability of all borders in the area of

the two countries; and

Whereas it is in the interest of the United States to oppose

any expansionist or irredentist policies in order to promote peace and stability in such area: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) the United States should use its influence

4 as a permanent member of the United Nations Secu5 rity Council to support the efforts of Greece, in its
3

•HCON 31 IH

1 negotiations with the Former Yugoslav Republic of

2 Macedonia, to find a solution which promotes a

3 solid, cooperative relationship between these two

4 neighboring countries; and

5 (2) the United States should not establish for6 mal diplomatic relations with the Former Yugoslav

7 Republic of Macedonia until such a relationship is

8 established.

Æ
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20 22

- 3 8 41

_____________________________
V IKAS K APOOR , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Jo shua M. Hawkes, Judge

. May 29, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
B ILBREY , W INOKUR , and T ANENBAUM , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Robert David Malove of the Law Office of Robert David Malove, P.A., Fort Lauderdale
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and D amaris E. Reynolds, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

FRANCESCA McELROY,

Appellant,

v.

GREGORY SOLOMON and MICHAEL McELROY,

Appellees.

No. 2D2023-1218

April 19, 2024

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the County Court for 

Pasco County; Kent Compton, Judge.

John Cullum, Wesley Chapel, for Appellant.

Somah Sameni, Tampa, for Appellee Gregory Solomon.

No appearance for Appellee Michael McElroy.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, BLACK, and LABRIT, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
§ 1.5000A-5 Administration and procedure. ( a ) *In general.* A taxpayer's liability for the shared responsibility payment for a month must be reported on the taxpayer's Federal income tax return for the taxable year that includes the month. The period of limitations for assessing the shared responsibility payment is the same as that prescribed by section 6501 for the taxable year to which the Federal income tax return on which the shared responsibility payment is to be reported relates. The shared responsibility payment is payable upon notice and demand by the Secretary, and except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, is assessed and collected in the same manner as an assessable penalty under subchapter B of chapter 68 of the Internal Revenue Code. The shared responsibility payment is not subject to deficiency procedures of subchapter B of chapter 63 of the Internal Revenue Code. Interest on this payment accrues in accordance with the rules in section 6601.
( b ) *Special rules.* Notwithstanding any other provision of law— ( 1 ) *Waiver of criminal penalties.* In the case of a failure by a taxpayer to timely pay the shared responsibility payment, the taxpayer is not subject to criminal prosecution or penalty for the failure.
( 2 ) *Limitations on liens and levies.* If a taxpayer fails to pay the shared responsibility payment imposed by this section and §§ 1.5000A-1 through 1.5000A-4, the Secretary will not file notice of lien on any property of the taxpayer, or levy on any property of the taxpayer for the failure.
( 3 ) *Authority to offset against overpayment.* Nothing in this section prohibits the Secretary from offsetting any liability for the shared responsibility payment against any overpayment due the taxpayer, in accordance with section 6402(a) and its corresponding regulations.
( c ) *Applicability date.* Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph (c), this section and §§ 1.5000A-1 through 1.5000A-4 apply for months beginning after December 31, 2013. Section 1.5000A-2(b)(2)(ix) applies for months beginning after September 28, 2020.
[T.D. 9632, 78 FR 53655, Aug. 30, 2013, as amended by T.D. 9970, 87 FR 76575, Dec. 15, 2022] Tax on Certain Foreign Procurement
Page 3 of 6


Page 6 of 6
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from the balance
sheet of CNL Income Fund VII, Ltd. at June 30, 2000, and its statement of income
for the six months then ended and is  qualified  in its entirety by reference to
the Form 10-Q of CNL Income  Fund VII,  Ltd.  for the six months  ended June 30,
2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         1,429,957
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  14,717
<ALLOWANCES>                                   10,960
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         15,534,787
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,561,269
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 24,926,392
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0<F1>
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     23,978,288
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   24,926,392
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,220,308
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  326,547
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,168,802
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,168,802
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,168,802
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Due to the nature of its industry, CNL Income Fund VII, Ltd. has an unclassified
balance  sheet;  therefore,  no values are shown  above for  current  assets and
current liabilities.
</FN>



</TABLE>
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | Commercial Mortgage Servicing

D1086-120, 12th Floor

550 South Tryon Street

Charlotte, NC 28202

1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2015, by and among Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer and initial Excluded Special Servicer, LNR Partners, LLC, as General Special Servicer, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Trust Advisor, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator, Certificate Registrar, Authenticating Agent and Custodian with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-C26 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 13.9 of the Agreement, I, Daniel Marthinsen, Managing Director of Special Servicing do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activities of the Excluded Special Servicer Servicer during the period from November 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Excluded Special Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Marthinsen

Daniel Marthinsen

Managing Director

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A |  (logo) Together we’ll go far

  |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 92

Condemning the proposed withdrawal of North Korea from the Treaty on

the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 2 (legislative day, MARCH 3), 1993

Mr. ROBB (for himself, Mr. BIDEN, Mr. HELMS, Mr. MURKOWSKI, Mr.

D’AMATO, and Mr. LUGAR) submitted the following resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

MAY 27 (legislative day, APRIL 19), 1993

Reported by Mr. PELL, without amendment

MAY 27 (legislative day, APRIL 19), 1993

Considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Condemning the proposed withdrawal of North Korea from

the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons,

and for other purposes.

Whereas North Korea stated its intention on March 12,

1993, to withdraw from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, done on July 1, 1968;

Whereas North Korea remains obligated under the Treaty for

a 90-day period;

Whereas no other country has ever formally withdrawn from

the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons;
2

•SRES 92 ATS

Whereas no other country has ever compelled the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to request a special inspection of its nuclear facilities;

Whereas North Korea refuses to allow a special inspection of

suspected nuclear waste sites in violation of the Treaty

on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons;

Whereas representatives from 35 countries make up the

IAEA Board of Governors allowing the Agency to act in

an impartial manner;

Whereas the United States withdrew all tactical nuclear

weapons from the Korean peninsula in 1991; and

Whereas annual Team Spirit U.S.-Republic of Korea exercises are conducted for defensive purposes and are not a

provocative act of war: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That (a) the Senate hereby condemns North

2 Korea for its stated intention to withdraw from the Treaty

3 on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.

4 (b) It is the sense of the Senate that the United

5 States and its international partners should take meas6 ured steps to compel North Korea to remain a party to

7 the Treaty and to allow unconditional special inspections

8 of apparent nuclear waste sites and other areas suspected

9 of harboring a nuclear weapons-building program.

Æ
<PAGE> 1
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


Item 6.                         
                                
Exhibit 11                              
                                
                                
                                                                      Three Months          Nine Months
                                                                         Ended                 Ended
                                                                     June 30, 1998        June 30, 1998
                                                                    ----------------     ----------------

<S>                                                                     <C>                  <C>       
Computation of per share earnings                                


Net income                                                               $779,021            $2,216,396
                                                                       ----------            ----------  

Weighted average common shares outstanding                              1,614,972             1,612,675
                                                                       ----------            ----------

Common stock equivalents due to dilutive effect of stock options           81,998                75,079
                                                                       ----------            ----------
                                
Total weighted average common shares and equivalents outstanding        1,696,970             1,687,754
                                                                       ----------            ----------
                                
Basic earnings per common share                                             $0.48                 $1.37
                                                                       ----------            ----------
                                
Diluted earnings per common share                                           $0.46                 $1.31

                                                                       ----------            ----------
</TABLE>
#### § 1.9003-5 Terms; applicability of other laws.

All other terms which are not otherwise specifically defined shall have the same meaning as when used in the Code (or the corresponding provisions of prior law) except where otherwise distinctly expressed or manifestly intended to the contrary. Further, all provisions of law contained in the Code (or the corresponding provisions of prior law) shall apply to the extent that they can apply. Thus, all of the provisions of subtitle F of the Code and the corresponding provisions of prior law shall apply to the extent they can apply, including the provisions of law relating to assessment, collection, credit or refund, and limitations. For purposes of this section and §§ 1.9003-1 to 1.9003-4, inclusive, the term “Act” means the Public Debt and Tax Rate Extension Act of 1960 as amended (74 Stat. 293, 1018).

[T.D. 6492, 25 FR 8905, Sept. 16, 1960]

CERTAIN BRICK AND TILE CLAY, FIRE CLAY, AND SHALE; REGULATIONS UNDER THE ACT OF SEPTEMBER 26, 1961
# Eiropas Savienības C 311A/2006

| | ISSN 1725-5201 |
| --- | --- |
| Eiropas Savienības
  Oficiālais Vēstnesis | C 311A |
| | |
| Izdevums latviešu valodā | Informācija un paziņojumi | 49. sējums2006. gada 19. decembris |

ISSN 1725-5201

Eiropas Savienības

Oficiālais Vēstnesis

C 311A

Izdevums latviešu valodā

Informācija un paziņojumi

49. sējums2006. gada 19. decembris

---

| Paziņojums Nr. | Saturs | Lappuse |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Paziņojumi |
| | Padome |
| 2006/C 311A/1 | Paziņojums par vakanci: administrators – padomnieks audiovizuālajos jautājumos (Atsauces Nr.: CONS/AD/046) | 1 |

Paziņojums Nr.

Saturs

Lappuse

III   Paziņojumi

Padome

2006/C 311A/1

Paziņojums par vakanci: administrators – padomnieks audiovizuālajos jautājumos (Atsauces Nr.: CONS/AD/046)

1

| LV | |
| --- | --- |

LV

---

III Paziņojumi

Padome

| 19.12.2006 | LV | Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis | CA 311/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2006

LV

Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis

CA 311/1

---

PAZIŅOJUMS PAR VAKANCI: ADMINISTRATORS – PADOMNIEKS AUDIOVIZUĀLAJOS JAUTĀJUMOS

(Atsauces Nr.: CONS/AD/046)

(2006/C 311 A/01)

Eiropas Savienības Ģenerālsekretariāts meklē kandidātu brīvajai amata vietai F ģenerāldirektorāta (Prese, Sakari, Protokols) 1. nodaļā “Preses dienests”.

Izvēlētajam kandidātam piedāvās pagaidu darbinieka līgumu AD10 kategorijā uz četriem gadiem (ar sešu mēnešu ilgu pārbaudes laiku), ko varēs atjaunot tikai vienu reizi ne vairāk kā uz diviem gadiem.

Lai iegūtu plašāku informāciju par brīvo amata vietu un kandidatūras iesniegšanas procedūru, lūdzam skatīt paziņojumu par vakanci, kas pieejams Padomes interneta vietnē:

http://www.consilium.europa.eu/concours

Kandidatūru pieteikumi jāiesniedz līdz 2007. gada 19. janvārim (pasta zīmogs).

---
[J-145A&B-2012] [MO: Per Curiam] 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Appellee 

 v. 

MICHAEL BARDO, 

 Appellant 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Appellant 

 v. 

MICHAEL BARDO, 

 Appellee 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 650 CAP 

Appeal from the Order dated 12/30/2011 

(docketed on 1/3/2012) in the Court of 

Common Pleas, Criminal Division, 

Luzerne County at No. CP-40-MD0002778-1992 

No. 651 CAP 

Appeal from the Order dated 12/30/2011 

(docketed on 1/3/2012) in the Court of 

Common Pleas, Criminal Division, 

Luzerne County at No. CP-40-MD0002778-1992 

SUBMITTED: November 5, 2012 

CONCURRING OPINION AND OPINION IN SUPPORT OF AFFIRMANCE ON 

DOCKET No. 651 CAP 

MR. JUSTICE BAER DECIDED: December 16, 2014 

 

 I join the Per Curiam Opinion’s disposition of the appeal of Michael Bardo and its 

affirmance of the denial of guilt-phase relief. As to the penalty phase, however, I join 

the Concurring Opinion and Opinion in Support of Affirmance on Docket No. 651 CAP 

by Justice Saylor to the extent that he would uphold the reasoning and holding of the 

post-conviction court in awarding penalty phase relief to Bardo because, like Justice 
[J-145A&B-2012] [M.O. - Per Curiam] - 2 

Saylor, I believe the lower court’s determinations are sufficiently supported by the 

record and free of legal error.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 28, 2015

p0720

Order 

Clerk

July 28, 2015

150464

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 150464

COA: 322848

Jackson CC: 09-005355-FH

TRENT ALLEN GARDNER, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 7, 2014 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
(c) EPA-approve

regulations.
§ 20.2039-3 Lump sum distributions under “qualified plans;” decedents dying after December 31, 1976, and before January 1, 1979. ( a ) *Limitation of section 2039(c) exclusion.* This section applies in the case of a decedent dying after December 31, 1976, and before January 1, 1979. If a lump sum distribution is paid with respect to the decedent under a plan described in § 20.2039-2(b) (1) or (2) (a “qualified plan”), no amount payable with respect to the decedent under the plan is excludable from the decedent's gross estate under § 20.2039-2.
( b ) *“Lump sum distribution” defined.* For purposes of this section the term “lump sum distribution” means a lump sum distribution defined in section 402(e)(4)(A) that satisfies the requirements of section 402(e)(4)(C), relating to the aggregation of certain trusts and plans. The distribution of an annuity contract is not a lump sum distribution for purposes of this section, and § 20.2039-2 will apply with respect to the distribution of an annuity contract without regard to whether the contract is included in a distribution that is otherwise a lump sum distribution under this paragraph (b). A distribution is a lump sum distribution for purposes of this section without regard to the election described in section 402(e)(4)(B).
( c ) *Amounts payable as a lump sum distribution.* If on the date the estate tax return is filed, an amount under a qualified plan is payable with respect to the decedent as a lump sum distribution (whether at the election of a beneficiary or otherwise), for purposes of this section the amount is deemed paid as a lump sum distribution no later than on such date. Accordingly, no portion of the amount payable under the plan is excludable from the value of the decedent's gross estate under § 20.2039-2. If, however, the amount payable as a lump sum distribution is not, in fact, thereafter paid as a lump sum distribution, there shall be allowed a credit or refund of any tax paid which is attributable to treating such amount as a lump sum distribution under this paragraph. Any claim for credit or refund filed under this paragraph must be filed within the time prescribed by section 6511, and must provide satisfactory evidence that the amount originally payable as a lump sum distribution is no longer payable in such form.
( d ) *Filing date.* For purposes of paragraph (c) of this section, “the date the estate tax return is filed” means the earlier of— ( 1 ) The date the estate tax return is actually filed, or
( 2 ) The date nine months after the decedent's death, plus any extension of time for filing the estate tax return granted under section 6081.
[T.D. 7761, 46 FR 7304, Jan. 23, 1981]