alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF GENZYME DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, L.P. FOR THE 
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY 
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                              73
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    98
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      98
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              382
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       (284)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        98
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    57
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   659
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (602)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (602)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (602)<F1>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>GENZYME DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, L.P. IS A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP. NET
EARNINGS OR LOSS ARE REPORTED PER PARTNERSHIP UNIT INSTEAD OF PER SHARE. THE
PARTNERSHIP INCURRED NET LOSSES OF $602,000 IN THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 1998 WHICH WERE ALLOCATED 100% TO THE GENERAL PARTNER.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
        32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Fonix Corporation on Form 10-Q for
        the
        period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
        Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas A. Murdock, Chief
        Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
        1350,
        as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
 
 (1)       The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)       The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
    
 **/s/
                THOMAS A.
                MURDOCK**Thomas
                A. MurdockChief
                Executive OfficerDated
                November 14, 2007
#### William G. MERRITT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-15595.

D.C. No. CV-97-006072-AWI.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*321Submitted June 10, 2002.*

Decided June 13, 2002.

Before RYMER, T.G. NELSON, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

William G. Merritt, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment for defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s summary judgment, *see Barnett v. Centoni,*31 F.3d 813, 815 (9th Cir.1994) (per curiam), and affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Merritt’s evidence, at most, demonstrated that his opinion differed from that of the prison’s medical staff with respect to the proper treatment for his vascular disease. *See Jackson v. McIntosh,*90 F.3d 330, 332 (9th Cir.1996); *Franklin v. Oregon,*662 F.2d 1337, 1344 (9th Cir.1981).

We deny all pending motions.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
dfA-,_IzcFieldsofOpportunitiesTERRYE.BRANSTAD,GOVERNORKIMREYNOLDS,LT.GOVERNORJanuary30,2015KarlBrooksRegionalAdministratorU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgencyRegionVII11201RennerBlvdLenexa,KS66219DearRegionalAdministratorBrooks:reD)5STATEOF10\NADEPARTMENTOFNATURALRESOURCESCHUCKGIPP,DIRECTORTheIowaDepartmentofNaturalResources(DNR)requeststhattheU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgencyapprovetheattachedStateImplementationPlan(SIP)revisiondesignedtopreventfutureviolationsofthe2008lead(Pb)NationalAmbientAirQualityStandards(NAAQS)inCouncilBluffs,Iowa.TheDNRdevelopedtheSIPrevisioninresponsetotheleadnonattainmentdesignationforaportionofPottawattamieCounty,publishedintheFederalRegisterNovember22,2011(76FR72097).TheSIPrevisionincludesamodelingdemonstrationshowingthereductionsneededtoattainandmaintaintheleadNAAQS,controlmeasuresmeetingRACTandRACMrequirements,enforceablecommitmentstoimplementcontingencymeasuresiftriggered,andotherrequirednonattainmentplanprovisions.Thecontrolmeasuresareenforceableandcontainproceduresformonitoringcompliance.AppendixBincorporatestheAdministrativeConsentOrder(2015-AQ-02)withGriffinPipeProductsCo.,LLC,andAppendixCcontainstheconstructionpermit(14-A-521)issuedtoAlterMetalRecycling;bothincludedforadoptionintotheSIP.Thesubmissionconformswiththerequirementsof40CodeofFederalRegulationsPart51,AppendixV.IlookforwardtotheU.S.EPA'sapprovalandpromulgationofaSIPrevisionfortheStateofIowainthismatter.Ifyouhaveanyquestionsregardingthissubmittal,pleasecontactMatthewJohnsonatmatthew.johnson@dnr.iowa.govor(515)725-9554.Sincerely,ChuckGippDirectorIowaDepartmentofNaturalResourcesEnclosures7900HickmanRoad,Suite1IWindsorHeights,Iowa50324515-725-9500FAX515-725-9501www.lowaCieanAir.gov
§ 20.2056(c)-1 Marital deduction; definition of “passed from the decedent.” ( a ) *In general.* The following rules are applicable in determining the person to whom any property interest “passed from the decedent”: ( 1 ) Property interests devolving upon any person (or persons) as surviving coowner with the decedent under any form of joint ownership under which the right of survivorship existed are considered as having passed from the decedent to such person (or persons).
( 2 ) Property interests at any time subject to the decedent's power to appoint (whether alone or in conjunction with any person) are considered as having passed from the decedent to the appointee under his exercise of the power, or, in case of the lapse, release or nonexercise of the power, as having passed from the decedent to the taker in default of exercise.
( 3 ) The dower or curtesy interest (or statutory interest in lieu thereof) of the decedent's surviving spouse is considered as having passed from the decedent to his spouse.
( 4 ) The proceeds of insurance upon the life of the decedent are considered as having passed from the decedent to the person who, at the time of the decedent's death, was entitled to receive the proceeds.
( 5 ) Any property interest transferred during life, bequeathed or devised by the decedent, or inherited from the decedent, is considered as having passed to the person to whom he transferred, bequeathed, or devised the interest, or to the person who inherited the interest from him.
( 6 ) The survivor's interest in an annuity or other payment described in section 2039 (see §§ 20.2039-1 and 20.2039-2) is considered as having passed from the decedent to the survivor only to the extent that the value of such interest is included in the decedent's gross estate under that section. If only a portion of the entire annuity or other payment is included in the decedent's gross estate and the annuity or other payment is payable to more than one beneficiary, then the value of the interest considered to have passed to each beneficiary is that portion of the amount payable to each beneficiary that the amount of the annuity or other payment included in the decedent's gross estate bears to the total value of the annuity or other payment payable to all beneficiaries.
( b ) *Expectant interest in property under community property laws.* If before the decedent's death the decedent's surviving spouse had merely an expectant interest in property held by her and the decedent under community property laws, that interest is considered as having passed from the decedent to the spouse.
[T.D. 6296, 23 FR 4529, June 24, 1958; 25 FR 14021, Dec. 31, 1960. Redesignated and amended by T.D. 8522, 59 FR 9654, Mar. 1, 1994]
IV

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 210

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a postage stamp should be issued

to honor law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 2, 1996

Mr. STUPAK (for himself and Mr. RAMSTAD) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a postage stamp

should be issued to honor law enforcement officers killed

in the line of duty.

Whereas more than 14,000 law enforcement officers lost their

lives in service to American communities since records

were started in 1794;

Whereas 174 law enforcement officers throughout the United

States lost their lives in service to American communities

in 1995;

Whereas, every other day, one law enforcement officer is

killed while serving an American community;

Whereas more than 66,000 law enforcement officers are assaulted each year while serving American communities

and 24,000 are injured during such assaults;
2

•HCON 210 IH

Whereas 600,000 law enforcement officers endanger their

lives each day to serve and protect American communities;

Whereas America’s law enforcement officers represent the

highly valued qualities of strength, courage, and valor;

and

Whereas issuing a postage stamp to honor the sacrifices of

America’s law enforcement officers is proper and fitting:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) a postage stamp should be issued to honor

4 law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty;

5 and

6 (2) the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee of

7 the United States Postal Service should recommend

8 to the Postmaster General that such a postage

9 stamp be issued.

Æ
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services****M..A..C R1204-0109062 Old Annapolis RoadColumbia, MD 21045Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380** |
|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp.

11 MADISON AVE

NEW YORK, New York 10010-3643

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificate Series 2015-C4

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

February 29, 2016

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
EXHIBIT 32.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Affordable Housing II Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Principal Executive Officer of the general partner of the general partner of the Partnership's general partner, C&M Management Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)-15 or 15(d)-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.



|                  |     |                            
|----------------- | --- | ---------------------------
|Date:             |     |                            
|February 21, 2006 | By: | /s/ John P. Manning        
|                  |     |                            
|                  |     | John P. Manning            
|                  |     | Principal Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 160 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 160

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

   Congratulating the people of the Republic of Sierra Leone on the 
        success of their recent democratic multiparty elections.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 160

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas since 1991 the people of the Republic of Sierra Leone have endured a 
        horrific civil war that has killed thousands of individuals and 
        displaced more than half the population of the country;
Whereas for the first time in almost 30 years, the Republic of Sierra Leone held 
        its first truly democratic multiparty elections to elect a president and 
        parliament and put an end to military rule;
Whereas the elections held on February 26, 1996, and the subsequent runoff 
        election held on March 15, 1996, were deemed by international and 
        domestic observers to be free and fair and legitimate expressions of the 
        will of the people of the Republic of Sierra Leone;
Whereas success of the newly elected democratic government led by President 
        Ahmad Tejan Kabbah could have a positive effect on the West African 
        neighbors of the Republic of Sierra Leone; and
Whereas the historic event of democratic multiparty elections in the Republic of 
        Sierra Leone should be honored: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) congratulates the people of the Republic of Sierra 
        Leone for holding their first democratic multiparty 
        presidential and parliamentary elections in nearly 30 years;
            (2) encourages all people of the Republic of Sierra Leone 
        to continue to negotiate an end to the civil war and to work 
        together after taking the critical first step of holding 
        democratic elections in that country;
            (3) reaffirms the commitment of the United States to help 
        nations move toward freedom and democracy; and
            (4) further reaffirms that the United States is committed 
        to encouraging peace, democracy, and economic development on 
        the African continent.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 21, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
     COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
     MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000856573
<NAME>                                         North American Vaccine, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                 937
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          494
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                          2,773
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     5,417
<PP&E>                                              59,800
<DEPRECIATION>                                      41,276
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      29,140
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               41,883
<BONDS>                                            100,326
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                          6,538
<COMMON>                                            90,550
<OTHER-SE>                                        (224,094)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        29,140
<SALES>                                                526
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       526
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       13,807
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2,086
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (15,303)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (15,303)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (15,303)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.47)



</TABLE>
(logo) pwc

 

 

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

 

To the Board of Directors and shareholders of CoreLogic,Inc.:

 

We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanyingReport on Assessment of Compliance, that CoreLogic Commercial Real EstateServices, Inc. (the "Company"), a subsidiary of CoreLogic, Inc.complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of theSecurities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for all loans for commercialmortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Company served as thecommercial tax service provider (the "Platform"), as of December 31,2016 and for the year then ended, only including 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(ii),1122(d)(2)(v), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii)and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which the Company has determined are applicable to theservicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Managementis responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Ourresponsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on ourexamination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestationstandards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and,accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’scompliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such otherprocedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examinationincluded testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, anddetermining whether the Company performed those selected activities incompliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limitedto the selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the periodcovered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detectnoncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequentto our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated orreported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believethat our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Ourexamination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliancewith the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Companycomplied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and forthe year ended December 31, 2016 for all loans for commercial mortgage loanoutsourcing customers for which the Company served as the commercial taxservice provider is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers

 

February 6, 2017

 

 

*PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 1800,Dallas TX 75201-2997*

*T: 214-746-6500, F: 214-712-6660, *www.pwc.com