alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 35.1








ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC








The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer pursuant to Section 3.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2015 (the "Sale and Servicing Agreement") among CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2015-4, as Issuer (the "Issuer"), CarMax Auto Funding LLC, as Depositor, and CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer (the "Servicer"), does hereby certify that:





|   |                                                                                                              
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | CarMax Business Services, LLC is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.




|   |                                                                                      
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate.




|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|3. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period beginning onMarch 1, 2017and ending onFebruary 28, 2018and of the Servicer's performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement was made under my supervision.  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout such period.







Capitalized terms used in this certificate and not otherwise defined herein have the meanings assigned to them in the Sale and Servicing Agreement.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of the Servicer, has duly executed this Officer's Certificate this 18th day of May, 2018 .





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC





/s/ Enrique Mayor-Mora


Enrique Mayor-Mora


Vice President and Treasurer
IV

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 220

Commending the Governments of Hungary and Romania on the occasion

of the signing of a Treaty of Understanding, Cooperation and Good

Neighborliness.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 25, 1996

Mr. LANTOS (for himself and Mr. HOKE) submitted the following concurrent

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Commending the Governments of Hungary and Romania on

the occasion of the signing of a Treaty of Understanding,

Cooperation and Good Neighborliness.

Whereas on September 16, 1996, a ‘‘Treaty of Understanding, Cooperation and good Neighborliness between Romania and the Republic of Hungary’’ was signed by Gyula

Horn, Prime Minister of Hungary, and by Nicolae

Vacaroiu, Prime Minister of Romania, in Timisoara/

Temesvar, Romania;

Whereas this agreement between the two governments is an

important step in contributing to the stability of that region and to reconciliation and cooperation among the nations of Central and Eastern Europe;
2

HCON 220 IH

Whereas this agreement will enhance the participation of

both countries in the Partnership for Peace program and

will contribute to and facilitate their closer cooperation

with the members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and the eventual entry of these countries into full

NATO participation; and

Whereas this agreement is a further significant step in the

process of reconciliation between Hungary and Romania

and reflects the desire and effort of both countries to improve their economic cooperation, to foster the free movement of peoples between their countries, to expand military relationships, and to increase cultural and educational cooperation: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) commends the farsighted leadership shown

4 by both the government of Hungary and the govern5 ment of Romania in reaching agreement on the

6 Treaty of Understanding, Cooperation and Good

7 Neighborliness signed on September 16, 1996;

8 (2) commends the frank, open, and reasoned

9 political dialogue between officials of Hungary and

10 Romania which led to the treaty;

11 (3) commends the two countries for their effort

12 to foster improved relations in all fields; and

13 (4) calls upon the President to utilize all avail14 able and appropriate means on behalf of the United

15 States to support the implementation of the provi-
3

HCON 220 IH

1 sions of the ‘‘Treaty of Understanding, Cooperation

2 and Good Neighborliness between Romania and the

3 Republic of Hungary’’ and to promote their efforts

4 for regional cooperation as the best means of bring5 ing these two countries into NATO and to ensure

6 lasting security in the region.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 146 (Friday, July 31, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 38180]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18295]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR09-20-002]


Enbridge Pipelines (Louisiana Intrastate) L.L.C.; Notice of 
Filing

July 27, 2009.
    Take notice that on July 23, 2009, Enbridge Pipelines (Louisiana 
Intrastate) L.L.C. filed its Statement of Operating Conditions in 
compliance with the July 16, 2009 Letter Order and pursuant to section 
284.123(e) of the Commission's regulations. Louisiana Intrastate states 
that it made revisions to include a stand-alone statement of rates.
    Any person desiring to participate in this proceeding must file a 
motion to intervene or a protest in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 
of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining 
the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make 
protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a 
party must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as 
appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests must be filed on or 
before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing an intervention or 
protest must serve a copy of that document on the Applicant. Anyone 
filing an intervention or protest on or before the intervention or 
protest date need not serve motions to intervene or protests on persons 
other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#15535047565a7b797c7b70466065657a676155737067763b727a63"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1a5c5f485955747673747f496f6a6a75686e5a7c7f6879347d756c">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, August 4, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-18295 Filed 7-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
RestrictedFlightZonesinArea

WewillbeoperatingtothesouthoftheLoganInternational

AirportrestrictedzoneintheBostonarea.

Braintree,MA(homeoperation)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Gehl
Company's condensed consolidated balance sheet at July 1, 2000 and condensed
consolidated statements of income for the six-month period ended July 1,
2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-01-2000
<CASH>                                            3885
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   102233
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                      41109
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                156014
<PP&E>                                           89322
<DEPRECIATION>                                   46232
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  232004
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            56641
<BONDS>                                          62233<F2>
<COMMON>                                           548
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      102616
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    232004
<SALES>                                         148206
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                148206
<CGS>                                           107451
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   107451
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2264
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  14151
<INCOME-TAX>                                      4953
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               9198
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      9198
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.65<F3>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.60
<FN>
<F1>The Company presents receivables on a net basis in compliance with Article
10 of Regulation S-X.
<F2>Includes all non-current portion of debt obligations
<F3>The EPS under the "EPS-Primary" tag represents Basic Earnings Per Share.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Milestone Scientific, Inc. on Form
10-KSB for the three months ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Leonard Osser,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.


                                     /s/ Leonard Osser
                                     ----------------------
                                     Leonard Osser
                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                     May 17, 2004


                                       22
§ 1.681(a)-1 Limitation on charitable contributions deductions of trusts; scope of section 681. Under section 681, the unlimited charitable contributions deduction otherwise allowable to a trust under section 642(c) is, in general, subject to percentage limitations, corresponding to those applicable to contributions by an individual under section 170(b)(1) (A) and (B), under the following circumstances; ( a ) To the extent that the deduction is allocable to “unrelated business income”;
( b ) For taxable years beginning before January 1, 1970, if the trust has engaged in a prohibited transaction;
( c ) For taxable years beginning before January 1, 1970, if income is accumulated for a charitable purpose and the accumulation is ( 1 ) unreasonable,
( 2 ) substantially diverted to a noncharitable purpose, or
( 3 ) invested against the interests of the charitable beneficiaries.
Further, if the circumstance set forth in paragraph (a) or (c) of this section is applicable, the deduction is limited to income actually paid out for charitable purposes, and is not allowed for income only set aside or to be used for those purposes. If the circumstance set forth in paragraph (b) of this section is applicable, deductions for contributions to the trust may be disallowed. The provisions of section 681 are discussed in detail in §§ 1.681(a)-2 through 1.681(c)-1. For definition of the term “income”, see section 643(b) and § 1.643(b)-1. [T.D. 6500, 25 FR 11814, Nov. 26, 1960, as amended by T.D. 7428, 41 FR 34627, Aug. 16, 1976]
#### § 1.904(f)-3 Allocation of net operating losses and net capital losses.

For rules relating to the allocation of net operating losses and net capital losses, see § 1.904(g)-3T.

[T.D. 9371, 72 FR 72598, Dec. 21, 2007]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA PR 21-0005

IN RE THE MOTION OF SCOTT MICHAEL PRUDHOMME FOR ADMISSION TO THE BAR OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

# FILED SEP 2 8 2021 Bowan Greenwood CleEtta rk of S @cit prerr ig a

ourt

Scott Michael Prudhomme has filed a motion for admission to the Bar ofthe State ofMontana pursuant to Rule V of the Rules for Admission, Admission on Motion. The BarAdmissionsAdministrator ofthe State Bar ofMontanahas informed the Court thatthe Commission on Character and Fitness has certified that Prudhomme has provided the necessary documentation and has satisfied the requirements prerequisite to admission on motion under Rule V. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and completion of any other processing requirements as set forth by the Bar Admissions Administrator, Scott Michael Prudhomme may be sworn in to the practice of law in the State ofMontana. Arrangements for swearing in may be made by contacting the office of the Clerk ofthe Montana Supreme Court. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis order to Petitioner and to the State Bar ofMontana. DATED this

# er day ofSeptember, 2021. 09/29/2021

Case Number: PR 21-0005

# /Q4!,7 ,,tJL Justices
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 89

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Waiving provisions of the Legislative Reorganizagress by July 31. tion Act of 1970 requiring adjournment of Con-
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 89

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That, nothwithstanding the provisions of sec3 tion 132(a) of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946

4 (2 U.S.C. 198(a)), the House of Representatives and the

5 Senate shall not adjourn for a period in excess of three

6 days, or adjourn sine die, until both Houses of Congress

7 have adopted a concurrent resolution providing either for

8 an adjournment (in excess of three days) to a day certain

9 or for adjournment sine die.

Passed the House of Representatives July 31, 1995.

Attest:

Clerk.
- BMVIT- IV/L 1 (Strategie und lnternationales) 

• Postanschrift: Postfach 201 , 1000 Wien 

Buroanschrift: RadetzkystraBe 2, 1 030 Wien 

E-Mail: 11 @bmvit.gv.at 

Internet: www.bmvit.gv.at 

GZ. BMVIT-40.005/0003-IV/L 1/2013 DVR:0000175 

To 

Paul Gretch 

Director, Office of International Aviation 

Office of the Assistant Secretary for 

Aviation and International Affairs 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

400 7'h Street, S.W. Room 6402 

Washington, DC 20590 

Paui.Gretch@dot.gov 

CC: Miriam.Zammit@vistajet.com 

Dear Mr. Gretch, 

n um• 

Vienna, 5 February 2012 

With reference to the intentions of VistaJet Luftfahrtunternehmen GmbH in continuing nonscheduled (charter) air services to/from the United States based on fi"fth, sixth or seventh freedom 

traffic rights and referring to the designation of the said airline the Austria Civil Aviation Authority 

and according to the provisions of the bilateral air services agreement (Air Services Agreement 

between the Austrian Federal Government and the Government of the United States of America, 

done at Vienna on 16th of March 1989, as amended), the Austria Civil Aviation Authority 

hereby confirms that similar requests submitted by the U.S. carriers will be treated on the basis of 

reciprocity. 

Sincerely Yours, 

Silvia Gehrer 

Director, Air ransport Affairs 

Federal Ministry of Transport, 

Innovation and Technology 

Civil Aviation Authority
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LAMAR GURDINE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 127 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 18th day of October, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
#### Claudette P. TELFAIR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Marvin T. RUNYON, Postmaster General, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 01-6030.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

June 18, 2002.

George H. Cortelyou and Adam C. Ford; * Jon Romberg, of counsel, Seton Hall University School of Law, Newark, NJ, for Appellant.

Vincent Lipari, Assistant United States Attorney; Varuni Nelson, Assistant United States Attorney, on the brief, for Alan Vinegrad, United States Attorney, Eastern District of New York, Central Islip, NY, for Appellee.

Present MINER, CABRANES and POOLER, Circuit Judges.

*

 Law students appearing pursuant to U.S.C. Ct.App. 2nd Cir. R. 46(e) (2002).

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, *577AND DECREED that the judgment of said District Court be and hereby is VACATED AND REMANDED.

Plaintiff-appellant Claudette Telfair appeals from a judgment entered on January 9, 2001 granting the summary judgment motion of defendant-appellee Marvin T. Runyon, Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service (“USPS”).

In its January 9, 2001 judgment, the District Court granted the USPS’ motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint because: (1) “only those claims where plaintiff has exhausted her administrative remedies may be considered under the totality of circumstances test”; (2) Tel-fair administratively exhausted only three alleged incidents of discrimination; and (3) these three alleged incidents of discrimination were legally insufficient to state a claim for a hostile work environment, or for discrimination on the basis of race, age, or sex.

In light of the recent United States Supreme Court decision, *National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Morgan,*— U.S.-, 122 S.Ct. 2061, - L.Ed.2d - (2002), we vacate the judgment and remand the cause to the District Court for further consideration of its judgment in light of *Morgan.*By this ruling, we intimate no view on the merits of the claims asserted, nor on the merits of any motions that might be made by either party on remand, including any motion to amend the complaint.

For the foregoing reasons, the order of the District Court is hereby VACATED AND REMANDED.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       4,570,645
<SECURITIES>                                 1,802,150
<RECEIVABLES>                                  710,615
<ALLOWANCES>                                    54,948
<INVENTORY>                                    536,818
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,648,802
<PP&E>                                       8,187,302
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,160,213
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,532,470
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          796,059
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    84,480,480
<OTHER-SE>                                (64,744,069)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,532,470
<SALES>                                        949,581
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,137,298
<CGS>                                          398,121
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  398,121
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,780,294
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (958,139)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (958,139)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07
        

</TABLE>