alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                      5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Sep-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Oct-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1
<CASH>                                            750
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  11,764
<ALLOWANCES>                                      257
<INVENTORY>                                    10,277
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               28,142
<PP&E>                                         30,194
<DEPRECIATION>                                  9,442
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 63,883
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          19,385
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         1
<COMMON>                                          199
<OTHER-SE>                                     17,311
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   63,883
<SALES>                                        33,473
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               33,473
<CGS>                                          26,046
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   6,721
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  224
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,191
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (709)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (272)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (437)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (437)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.04)


</TABLE>
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAnalysis of the Ability of United States and Russian Trace Contaminant Control Systems to Meet U.S. 180-Day and Russian 360-Day Spacecraft Maximum Allowable ConcentrationsAs the Space Station Freedom program transitioned to become the International Space Station (ISS), uncertainty existed concerning the performance capabilities for U.S.- and Russian-provided trace contaminant control (TCC) equipment. In preparation for the first dialogue between NASA and Russian Space Agency personnel in Moscow, Russia, in late April 1994, an engineering analysis was conducted to serve as a basis for discussing TCC equipment engineering assumptions as well as relevant assumptions on equipment offgassing and cabin air quality standards. The analysis presented was conducted as part of the efforts to integrate Russia into the ISS program via the early ISS Multilateral Medical Operations Panel's Air Quality Subgroup deliberations. This analysis, served as a basis for technical deliberations that established a framework for TCC system design and operations among the ISS program's international partners that has been instrumental in successfully managing the ISS common cabin environment.Document ID20170005167Acquisition SourceMarshall Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsPerry, J. L.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Date AcquiredJune 5, 2017Publication DateJuly 1, 2016Subject CategoryMan/System Technology And Life SupportReport/Patent NumberM-1416NASA/TM-2016-218225Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20170005167.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 1.6109-1 Identifying numbers. ( a ) *Information to be furnished after April 15, 1974.* For provisions concerning the requesting and furnishing of identifying numbers with respect to returns, statements, and other documents which must be filed after April 15, 1974, see § 301.6109-1 of this chapter (Regulations on Procedure and Administration).
( b ) *Information to be furnished before April 15, 1974.* For provisions concerning the requesting and furnishing of identifying numbers with respect to returns, statements, and other documents which must be filed before April 16, 1974, see 26 CFR § 1.6109-1 (revised as of April 1, 1973).
[T.D. 7306, 39 FR 9946, Mar. 15, 1974; 39 FR 11080, Mar. 25, 1974]
#### § 1.955-4 Definition of less developed country.

(a) *Designation by Executive order.* For purposes of sections 951 through 964, the term “less developed country” means any foreign country (other than an area within the Sino-Soviet bloc) or any possession of the United States with respect to which, on the first day of the foreign corporation's taxable year, there is in effect an Executive order by the President of the United States designating such country or possession as an economically less developed country for purposes of such sections. Each territory, department, province, or possession of any foreign country other than a country within the Sino-Soviet bloc may be treated as a separate foreign country for purposes of such designation if the territory, department, province, or possession is overseas from the country of which it is a territory, department, province, or possession. Thus, for example, an overseas possession of a foreign country may be designated by Executive order as an economically less developed country even though the foreign country itself has not been designated as an economically less developed country; or the foreign country may be so designated even though the overseas possessions of such country have not been designated as economically less developed countries. The term “possession of the United States”, for purposes of section 955(c)(3) and this section, shall be construed to have the same meaning as that contained in paragraph (b)(2) of § 1.957-3.

(b) *Countries not eligible for designation.* Section 955(c)(3) provides that no designation by Executive order may be made under section 955(c)(3) and paragraph (a) of this section with respect to—

- Australia
- Austria
- Belgium
- CanadaDenmark
- France
- Germany (Federal Republic)
- Hong Kong
- Italy
- Japan
- Liechtenstein
- Luxembourg
- Monaco
- Netherlands
- New Zealand
- Norway
- Union of South Africa
- San Marino
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- United Kingdom.

(c) *Termination of designation.* Section 955(c)(3) provides that, after the President has designated any foreign country or possession of the United States as an economically less developed country for purposes of sections 951 through 964, he may not terminate such designation (either by issuing an Executive order for the purpose of terminating such designation or by issuing an Executive order which has the effect of terminating such designation) unless, at least 30 days prior to such termination, he has notified the Senate and the House of Representatives of his intention to terminate such designation. If such 30-day notice is given, no action by the Congress of the United States is necessary to effectuate the termination. The requirement for giving 30-day notice to the Senate and House of Representatives applies also to the termination of a designation with respect to an overseas territory, department, province, or possession of a foreign country. See paragraph (c) of § 1.955-2 for the effect of a termination of a Presidential designation upon property which would be a qualified investment in a less developed country but for the fact of such termination.

[T.D. 6683, 28 FR 11182, Oct. 18, 1963]
FAA-H-8083-6

Advanced Avionics Handbook

Updated May 2, 2013

Errata as of May 2, 2013

1. In Figure 3-16 on page 3-13, the following errors were discovered and will be corrected 

in the next version of this handbook:

a. The lower right control display indicates a bearing of 087° to COVAR. This should 

be corrected to indicate 079°.

b. The left navigation display indicates a bearing of 051° to COVAR. This should be 

corrected to indicate 079°.

Note: The #2 (blue) bearing pointer on the left navigation display indicating a 

bearing of 079° to COVAR is correct.

c. The upper right control display indicates a bearing of 272° to FOGON. This should 

be corrected to indicate 268° or 269°.

d. The left navigation display indicates a bearing of 270° to FOGON. This should be 

corrected to indicate 268° or 269°since the CDI needle is not exactly centered.

e. On the left navigation display, the #1 (green) CDI bar is set to 268°, but the center 

portion of the bar is not aligned in the center, so the set course is slightly to the right.

Depending on the settings, the bearing to FOGON should be corrected to indicate 

somewhere between 268° and 269°, but not 270°.

f. Both captions stating "FMS" should corrected to "GPS" since right side control 

displays are typical of GPS control units and are much simpler than most FMS units.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7066

TESSA R. R. G. C. CHILDRESS, a/k/a Tessa Rani Raybourne 

Childress,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

CHARLESTON COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE; DANA E HERRON, 

Inspector; INTERNAL AFFAIRS OFFICE OF THE PROFESSIONAL 

STANDARDS, The Charleston County Sheriff’s Office,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (2:13-cv-01008-SB)

Submitted: September 24, 2013 Decided: September 27, 2013

Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, 

Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tessa R R G C Childress, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Tessa R.R.G.C. Childress appeals the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Childress v. Charleston Cnty. Sheriff’s Office, No. 

2:13-cv-01008-SB (D.S.C. June 26, 2013). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2015, by andamong WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as General Master Servicer, CWCAPITAL ASSETMANAGEMENT LLC, as General Special Servicer, NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BANK, N.A.,as NCB Master Servicer, NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BANK, N.A, as NCB SpecialServicer, PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and asCustodian and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respectto Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-C30 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the General Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 throughDecember 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performanceper the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the General Master Servicer, has fulfilled allof its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
# Redirecting…

Click here if you are not redirected.
----

COUNCIL DECISION

of 4 December 2006

amending the Decision of 27 March 2000 authorising the Director of Europol to enter into negotiations on agreements with third States and non-EU related bodies

(2006/C 311/02)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Article 42(2), Article 10(4) and Article 18 of the Convention on the establishment of a European Police Office (Europol Convention) (1),

Having regard to the Council Act of 3 November 1998 laying down rules governing Europol's external relations with third States and non-European Union related bodies (2), and in particular Article 2 of that Act,

Having regard to the Council Act of 3 November 1998 laying down rules governing the receipt of information by Europol from third parties (3), and in particular Article 2 of that Act,

Having regard to the Council Act of 12 March 1999 adopting the rules governing the transmission of personal data by Europol to third States and third bodies (4), and in particular Articles 2 and 3 of that Act,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Council Decision of 27 March 2000 is hereby amended as follows:

in Article 2(1), under the heading ‘Third States’, the following States shall be added to the alphabetical list:

and

Article 2

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 4 December 2006.

For the Council

The President

L. LUHTANEN

----

(1)OJ C 316, 27.11.1995, p. 2.

(2)OJ C 26, 30.1.1999, p. 19.

(3)OJ C 26, 30.1.1999, p. 17.

(4)OJ C 88, 30.3.1999, p. 1.

(5)OJ C 106, 13.4.2000, p. 1. Decision as last amended by Decision 2005/169/EC (OJ L 56, 2.3.2005, p. 14).

----
** **

**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification ofthe Chief Financial OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

In connection with the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of Kaiser Group Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) forthe period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Nicholas Burakow, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| May 14, 2007 |   | /s/ Nicholas Burakow     |
|-------------------|--------|--------------------------|
|              |   | Nicholas Burakow, Ph.D., |
|              |   | Chief Financial Officer  |

 

 

----
§ 156.6694-2 Penalties for understatement due to an unreasonable position. ( a ) *In general.* A person who is a tax return preparer of any return or claim for refund of tax under section 5881 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) shall be subject to penalties under section 6694(a) of the Code in the manner stated in § 1.6694-2 of this chapter.
( b ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section is applicable to returns and claims for refund filed, and advice provided, after December 31, 2008.
[T.D. 9436, 73 FR 78461, Dec. 22, 2008]
EXHIBIT 10.3
                            FIRST AMENDMENT
                        TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

     This First Amendment to Employment Agreement (the "Amendment"),
effective as of May 8, 2000, is by and between Phoenix Fuel Co., Inc., an
Arizona corporation (the "Company"), and Jack W. Keller (the "Executive").

                               RECITALS

     A.  Pursuant to that certain Employment Agreement (the
         "Agreement"), dated as of May 7, 1997, the Company retained
         the Executive as an executive of the Company, for the
         consideration and on the terms set forth in the Agreement.
         Capitalized terms used herein that are not defined shall have
         the meaning given to such terms in the Agreement.

     B.  The Company and the Executive now desire to amend the
         Agreement to provide that the entire Stay-on Bonus shall be
         payable in cash and the final installment of $180,000 shall be
         payable on May 10, 2000.

     NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing Recitals and for
other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of
which are hereby acknowledged, each of the Company and the Executive,
intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:

                              AGREEMENT

     1.  Notwithstanding any provision of the Agreement to the
         contrary, the Stay-on Bonus shall be paid entirely in cash and
         the final installment of $180,000.00 shall be paid by the
         Company to the Executive on May 10, 2000.

     2.  This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts,
         each of which will be deemed an original but all of which
         taken together will constitute one and the same instrument.

     3.  Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, all other
         terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full
         force and effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment
as of the date first above written.

     COMPANY:

     Phoenix Fuel Co., Inc.

     By: /s/ MARK B. COX
        ________________________
     Name:  Mark B. Cox
     Title: Vice President

     EXECUTIVE:

     /s/ JACK W. KELLER
     ___________________________
          Jack W. Keller
Tabitha Femmer, Viznu, Lafayette LA

- Section 333 Exemption PetitionTabitha Femmer, Viznu, Lafayette LA

- Section 333 Exemption Petition
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 149 (Wednesday, August 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39054-39055]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18727]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-201-834]


Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from Mexico: Extension of Time 
Limit for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Flessner or Robert James, AD/CVD 
Enforcement Office 7, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6312 
and (202) 482-0649, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On April 10, 2009, the Department of Commerce (``Department'') 
published the preliminary results of administrative review of purified 
carboxymethylcellulose from Mexico for the July 1, 2007, through June 
30, 2008, period of review. See Purified Carboxymethylcellulose From 
Mexico: Notice of Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review, 74 FR 16359 (April 10, 2009). The final results 
for this administrative review are currently due no later than August 
8, 2009.

Extension of Time Limits for Preliminary Results

    Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the 
Act''), requires the Department to complete the final results of an 
administrative review within 120 days after the date on which the 
preliminary results are published. However, if it is not practicable to 
complete the review within these time periods, section 751(a)(3)(A) of 
the Act allows the Department to extend the 120 day time period for the 
final results to 180 days.
    The Department has determined it is not practicable to complete 
this review within the statutory time limit because of significant 
issues that require additional time to evaluate. These include 
questions involving entry dates and entered values, necessitating a 
post-preliminary supplemental questionnaire. Accordingly, the 
Department is extending the time limit for completion of the final 
results of this administrative review until no later than October 7, 
2009, which is 180 days after the date on which the preliminary results 
of review were published.

[[Page 39055]]

    This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 
751(a)(3)(A) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: July 30, 2009.
John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing 
Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. E9-18727 Filed 8-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S