alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 156.5881-1 Imposition of excise tax on greenmail. ( a ) *In general.* Section 5881 of the Code imposes a tax equal to 50 percent of the gain or other income realized by any person on the receipt of greenmail, whether or not the gain or other income is recognized.
( b ) *Transactions occurring on or after March 31, 1988.* For transactions occurring on or after March 31, 1988, greenmail is defined as any consideration transferred by a corporation (or any person acting in concert with the corporation) to directly or indirectly acquire stock of the corporation from any shareholder if: ( 1 ) The transferring shareholder has held the stock (as determined under section 1223) for less than two years before entering into the agreement to transfer the stock,
( 2 ) The shareholder, any person acting in concert with the shareholder, or any person related to the shareholder or to a person acting in concert with the shareholder made or threatened to make a public tender offer for stock of the corporation at some time during the two-year period ending on the date of the acquisition of the stock by the corporation, and
( 3 ) The acquisition is pursuant to an offer that was not made on the same terms to all shareholders.
( c ) *Transactions occurring before March 31, 1988.* For transactions occurring before March 31, 1988, greenmail has the same meaning as in paragraph (b) of this section, except that it does not include any consideration transferred by any person acting in concert with the corporation described in that paragraph.
( d ) *Effective date.* Generally, section 5881 of the Code applies to consideration received after December 22, 1987, in taxable years ending after that date. However, section 5881 does not apply to any acquisition of stock pursuant to a written binding contract in effect on December 15, 1987, and at all times thereafter before the acquisition.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21
- 7262

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. CLAYTON SAMUEL PAUL , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro

. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 1:13

- cr - 00342

- NCT

- 1 ; 1:21

- cv - 00560

- NCT

- LPA )

Submitted : January 20, 2022 Decided: January 25, 2022

Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Dismiss ed by un published per curiam opinion

. Clayton Samuel Paul , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Clayton Sam uel Paul seeks to appeal the district court ’ s order a ccepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and construing his “Motion Requesting Review of Conviction ” as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and dismissing it a s successive and unauthorized

. The order i s not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)( B ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When , as here, the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitution al right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Paul has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of a ppealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISS ED
##### 



Exhibit 11

POTASH CORPORATION OF SASKATCHEWAN INC.
COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30

(Figures and amounts expressed in millions, except per share amounts)

| |   |  |  |                                                                           |  |      |            |      |  |   |            |  
| | - |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ---------- | ---- |  | - | ---------- | -
| |   |  |  |                                                                           |  | 2002 |            | 2001
| |   |  |  |                                                                           |  |      |            |     
| | A |  |  | Net income as reported, Canadian GAAP                                     |  | $    | 39.2       |      |  | $ | 116.7      |  
| | B |  |  | Items adjusting net income                                                |  | $    | 5.3        |      |  | $ | (17.6      | )
| | C |  |  | Net income, US GAAP                                                       |  | $    | 44.5       |      |  | $ | 99.1       |  
| | D |  |  | Weighted average number of shares outstanding                             |  |      | 52,006,000 |      |  |   | 51,867,000 |  
| | E |  |  | Net additional shares issuable for diluted earnings per share calculation |  |      | 256,000    |      |  |   | 316,000    |  
| |   |  |  | CANADIAN
GAAP                                                            
| |   |  |  | Basic earnings per share (A/D)                                            |  | $    | 0.75       |      |  | $ | 2.25       |  
| |   |  |  | Diluted earnings per share ((A/(D+E))                                     |  | $    | 0.75       |      |  | $ | 2.24       |  
| |   |  |  | UNITED
STATES GAAP                                                       
| |   |  |  | Basic earnings per share (C/D)                                            |  | $    | 0.86       |      |  | $ | 1.91       |  
| |   |  |  | Diluted earnings per share ((C/(D+E))                                     |  | $    | 0.85       |      |  | $ | 1.90       |
Exhibit 35.10



|     |  |                                                                                                                       
|---- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | Corporate Trust Services MAC R1204-010 9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045 
Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380

Citibank, National Association

388 Greenwich Street

14th Floor

New York, New York 10013



|Re: | Annual Statement of Compliance for MSCCG Trust 2015-ALDR Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-ALDR
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Per the Trust and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 5, 2015 (the Agreement), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator (Wells Fargo), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the Reporting Period):

(a)    A review of Wells Fargos activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has
been made under such officers supervision; and

(b)    To the best of such officers knowledge, based on
such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

March 1,
2017



|              
|--------------
|LOGO          
|BRIAN SMITH   
|Vice President



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of : No. 22 DB 2021 (No. 26 RST 2021)

:

MEAGHAN ELIZABETH CHIRILLO : Attorney Registration No. 308152

:

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT :

 FROM INACTIVE STATUS : (Indiana County)

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6

th day of May, 2021, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated April 29, 2021, is approved and it is ORDERED that

Meaghan Elizabeth Chirillo, who has been on Inactive Status, has demonstrated that she 

has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to 

practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a 

member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the 

investigation and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000854941
<NAME>                        Elegant Illusions, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                        1
<CASH>                                         1,349,822
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    479,780
<ALLOWANCES>                                      16,000
<INVENTORY>                                    2,612,762
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,868,078
<PP&E>                                         3,298,443
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,447,221
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6,808,187
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            141,651
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           6,146
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,914,509
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6,808,187
<SALES>                                        2,254,863
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,254,863
<CGS>                                            644,930
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    644,930
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,662,374
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (52,441)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (19,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (33,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (33,441)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.00
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 149 (Wednesday, August 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 39094]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18709]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[AA-9526, AA-10173, AA-10205, AA-10211, AA-11471, AA-10222, AA-10224, 
AA-10273, AA-10278, AA-10381, AA-11412, AA-10383, AA-11665; LLAK-
962000-L14100000-HY0000-P]


Alaska Native Claims Selection

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of decision approving lands for conveyance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As required by 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice is hereby given that 
an appealable decision approving the conveyance of surface and 
subsurface estates for certain lands pursuant to the Alaska Native 
Claims Settlement Act will be issued to Calista Corporation for 198.70 
acres located northeasterly of the Native village of Akiak, Alaska, and 
southeasterly of the Native village of Napaskiak, Alaska. Notice of the 
decision will also be published four times in the Anchorage Daily News.

DATES: The time limits for filing an appeal are:
    1. Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely 
affected by the decision shall have until September 4, 2009 to file an 
appeal.
    2. Parties receiving service of the decision by certified mail 
shall have 30 days from the date of receipt to file an appeal.
Parties who do not file an appeal in accordance with the requirements 
of 43 CFR Part 4, Subpart E, shall be deemed to have waived their 
rights.

ADDRESSES: A copy of the decision may be obtained from: Bureau of Land 
Management, Alaska State Office, 222 West Seventh Avenue, <greek-i>13, 
Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7504.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Bureau of Land Management by phone 
at 907-271-5960, or by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7213195c101e1f5c111d1c04170b131c11173213195c101e1f5c151d04"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="90f1fbbef2fcfdbef3fffee6f5e9f1fef3f5d0f1fbbef2fcfdbef7ffe6">[email protected]</span></a>. Persons 
who use a telecommunication device (TTD) may call the Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8330, 24 hours a day, 
seven days a week, to contact the Bureau of Land Management.

Dina L. Torres,
Land Transfer Resolution Specialist, Resolution Branch.
[FR Doc. E9-18709 Filed 8-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JA-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.67

                             SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE
               DTE ENERGY COMPANY DEFERRED STOCK COMPENSATION PLAN
                           FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

                                    RECITALS

A. DTE Energy Company (the "Company") adopted the DTE Energy Company Deferred
Stock Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the "Plan") to enable the
Company to attract and retain Directors.

B. The Company's Board of Directors (the "Board") is authorized to amend the
Plan.

C. By a resolution properly adopted on January 27, 2005, the Board amended the
Plan to increase the number of hypothetical shares of Company stock annually
credited to Directors under the Plan.

                                 PLAN AMENDMENT

Effective January 1, 2005, the DTE Energy Company Deferred Stock Compensation
Plan for Non-Employee Directors is amended as follows:

Section III is replaced in its entirety with the following:

Each Director participating in the Plan who is a Director on the first business
day of a calendar year beginning on or after January 1, 2005 shall receive
automatically on January 27, 2005 for the 2005 calendar year and as of the first
business day of a calendar year beginning after 2005 as a credit to an unfunded
deferred stock account established for the Director under Section IV below,
1,250 hypothetical shares of Company Common Stock.

                            CERTIFICATE OF SECRETARY
                                       OF
                               DTE ENERGY COMPANY

I, Sandra Kay Ennis, certify that I am the Corporate Secretary of DTE Energy
Company, a Michigan corporation (the "Company"), and have access to the
Company's corporate records and am familiar with the matters contained and
certified to in this Certificate.

I certify that, at a duly called meeting of the Board of Directors of the
Company held on January 27, 2005, the Board of Directors adopted the above
amendment.


/s/ Sandra Kay Ennis
-----------------------------------------
Sandra Kay Ennis

February 19, 2007
-----------------------------------------
Date


        Second Amendment to Deferred Stock Compensation Plan- Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of Owl Rock Capital Corporation II (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to the undersigned’s knowledge: 

 

1) the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

2) the information contained in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| Date: March 2, 2018 |   | By:    | /s/ Craig W. Packer |
|---------------------|--------|--------|--------------------------|
|                |   |   | Craig W. Packer          |
|                |   |   | Chief Executive Officer  |
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Covalent Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth M. Borow, M.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    Kenneth M. Borow, M.D.                                                  
|                                                                               
|Kenneth M. Borow, M.D. President
and Chief Executive Officer  November 13, 2003
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In the Interest of C.H.M., a Child

No. 06-19-00108-CV

Appeal from the County Court at Law of 

Lamar County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 88327). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief 

Justice Morriss, Justice Burgess and Justice 

Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant has adequately indicated her inability to pay costs of appeal. 

Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MARCH 13, 2020

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification of Vice President, Finance and ChiefFinancial Officer**

 

**Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as Amended**

 

Pursuant to Rule13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted), Arthur O. Whipple, the Vice President, Finance andChief Financial Officer of Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

1.               The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period endedMarch 31, 2006, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the “PeriodicReport”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.               The informationcontained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

In Witness Whereof, theundersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 10th day of May, 2006.

 

 
| /s/ Arthur O. Whipple                                |   |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Arthur O. Whipple                                    |
| Vice President, Finance  and Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, has been provided to Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. andwill be retained by Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

This certificationaccompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by referenceinto any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, orthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or afterthe date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation languagecontained in such filing.

 

----
----

----

I Meddelelser

Kommissionen

----

Meddelelse fra Kommissionen i forbindelse med gennemførelsen af Rådets direktiv 89/106/EØF af 21. december 1988 om indbyrdes tilnærmelse af medlemsstaternes love og administrative bestemmelser om byggevarer

(EØS-relevant tekst)

(Titler og referencer for harmoniserede standarder som skal offentliggøres i henhold til direktivet)

(2006/C 304/01)

Bemærk:

Yderligere information kan findes på Europa-serveren:

http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/newapproach/standardization/harmstds/

----

(1)

(2)  Slutdatoen for sameksistensperioden er den samme som datoen for tilbagetrækning af uoverensstemmende nationale tekniske specifikationer, efter hvilken formodning om overensstemmelse skal baseres på harmoniserede europæiske specifikationer (harmoniserede standarder eller europæiske tekniske godkendelser).

(3)  I tilfælde af tillæg til standarder, er reference standarden EN CCCCC: YYYY, incl. eventuelle tidligere tillæg, og det nye anførte tillæg.

(4)EFT L 204 af 21.7.1998, s. 37

(5)EFT L 217 af 5.8.1998, s. 18.

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7663

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JOSE RICO-GOMEZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr.,

Chief District Judge. (3:06-cr-00147-RJC; 3:07-cv-00388-RJC)

Submitted: February 21, 2008 Decided: February 27, 2008

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior

Circuit Judge. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jose Rico-Gomez, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Jose Rico-Gomez seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000).

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. See Miller-El

v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529

U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.

2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that

Rico-Gomez has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED