Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 151 / Friday, August 7, 2009 / Notices 39697 

is no such delegated authority, the 

reports are sent directly to the EPA 

regional office. 

Burden Statement: The annual public 

reporting and recordkeeping burden for 

this collection of information is 

estimated to average 160 hours per 

response. Burden means the total time, 

effort, or financial resources expended 

by persons to generate, maintain, retain, 

or disclose and provide information to 

or for a Federal agency. This includes 

the time needed to review instructions, 

develop, acquire, install, and utilize 

technology and systems for the purposes 

of collecting, validating, and verifying 

information, processing and 

maintaining information, and disclosing 

and providing information. All existing 

ways will have to adjust to comply with 

any previously applicable instructions 

and requirements that have 

subsequently changed; train personnel 

to be able to respond to a collection of 

information; search data sources; 

complete and review the collection of 

information; and transmit or otherwise 

disclose the information. 

Respondents/Affected Entities: 

Mercury. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

107. 

Frequency of Response: Initially, 

annually and semiannually. 

Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 

20,490. 

Estimated Total Annual Cost: 

$1,735,421 in labor costs exclusively. 

There are no capital/startup or O&M 

costs associated with this ICR. 

Changes in the Estimates: There is no 

change in the labor cost in this ICR 

compared to the previous ICR. This is 

due to two considerations: (1) The 

regulations have not changed over the 

past three years and are not anticipated 

to change over the next three years; and 

(2) the growth rate for the industry is 

very low, negative or nonexistent, so 

there is no significant change in the 

overall burden. 

Since there are no changes in the 

regulatory requirements and there is no 

significant industry growth, the labor 

hours and cost figures in the previous 

ICR are used in this ICR, and there is no 

change in burden to industry. 

Dated: July 31, 2009. 

John Moses, 

Director, Collection Strategies Division. 

[FR Doc. E9–18965 Filed 8–6–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[ER–FRL–8596–2] 

Environmental Impact Statements and 

Regulations; Availability of EPA 

Comments 

Availability of EPA comments 

prepared pursuant to the Environmental 

Review Process (ERP), under section 

309 of the Clean Air Act and Section 

102(2)(c) of the National Environmental 

Policy Act as amended. Requests for 

copies of EPA comments can be directed 

to the Office of Federal Activities at 

202–564–7146. 

An explanation of the ratings assigned 

to draft environmental impact 

statements (EISs) was published in FR 

dated July 17, 2009 (74 FR 34754). 

Draft EISs 

EIS No. 20090176, ERP No. D–FHW– 

L40237–WA, WA–502 Corridor 

Widening Project, Proposes 

Improvements to Five Miles of WA– 

502 (NE–219th Street) between NE 

15th Avenue and NE 102nd Avenue, 

Funding, Clark County, WA. 

Summary: EPA expressed 

environmental concerns about wetland 

mitigation, ecological connectivity 

issues and stormwater impacts. EPA 

requested additional analysis of indirect 

and cumulative effects of travel and 

land use change, mobile source air 

toxics, and invasive species. Rating EC2. 

EIS No. 20090179, ERP No. D–AFS– 

K65367–CA, Klamath National Forest 

Motorized Route Designation, 

Motorized Travel Management, 

(Formerly Motorized Route 

Designation), Implementation, 

Siskiyou County, CA. 

Summary: EPA expressed 

environmental concerns about water 

resource impacts, and asbestos impacts, 

and requested additional information on 

monitoring, enforcement commitments, 

effects of climate change, and future 

planning for specific designated routes. 

Rating EC2. 

Final EISs 

EIS No. 20090213, ERP No. F–USN– 

E11068–00, Undersea Warfare 

Training Range Project, Installation 

and Operation, Preferred Site 

Jacksonville Operating Area, FL and 

Alternative Sites (within the 

Charleston, SC; Cherry Point, NC; and 

VACAPES Operating Areas, VA. 

Summary: EPA expressed 

environmental concerns about impacts 

to the marine environment from the 

deposition of expended training 

materials. 

EIS No. 20090214, ERP No. F–CGD– 

A03086–00, PROGRAMMATIC— 

Vessel and Facility Response Plans for 

Oil: 2003 Removal Equipment 

Requirements and Alternative 

Technology Revisions, To Increase the 

Oil Removal Capability, U.S. 

Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), 

United States, Alaska, Guam, Puerto 

Pico and other U.S. Territories. 

Summary: EPA continues to have 

environmental concerns about the 

potential environmental impacts from 

dispersant application. 

EIS No. 20090201, ERP No. FS–AFS– 

K65281–CA, Brown Project, Revised 

Proposal to Improve Forest Health by 

Reducing Overcrowded Forest Stand 

Conditions, Trinity River 

Management Unit, Shasta-Trinity 

National Forest, Weaverville Ranger 

District, Trinity County, CA 

Summary: No formal comment letter 

was sent to preparing agency. 

Dated: August 4, 2009. 

Robert W. Hargrove, 

Director, NEPA Compliance Division Office 

of Federal Activities. 

[FR Doc. E9–18967 Filed 8–6–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[ER–FRL–8596–1] 

Environmental Impacts Statements; 

Notice of Availability 

Responsible Agency: Office of Federal 

Activities, General Information (202) 

564–1399 or http://www.epa.gov/ 

compliance/nepa/. 

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact 

Statements 

Filed 07/27/2009 Through 07/31/2009 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9. 

EIS No. 20090265, Draft EIS, AFS, ID, 

Clearwater National Forest Travel 

Planning Project, Proposes to Manage 

Motorized and Mechanized Travel 

within the 1,827.380–Acre, 

Clearwater National Forest, Idaho, 

Clearwater, Latah and Shoshone 

Counties, ID, Comment Period Ends: 

09/21/2009, Contact: Doug Gober 

208–476–4541. 

EIS No. 20090266, Draft EIS, IBR, CA, 

Madera Irrigation District Water 

Supply Enhancement Project, 

Constructing and Operating a Water 

Bank on the Madera Property, Madera 

County, CA, Comment Period Ends: 

09/21/2009, Contact: Patti Clinton 

559–487–5127. 

EIS No. 20090267, Draft EIS, AFS, MT, 

Bitteroot National Forest Travel 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES