alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the financial
statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,654
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,966
<ALLOWANCES>                                        54
<INVENTORY>                                     17,507
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,380
<PP&E>                                          10,972
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,077
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  41,465
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,033
<BONDS>                                          1,791
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          5
<COMMON>                                            38
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,914
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    41,465
<SALES>                                         21,804
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,804
<CGS>                                           16,504
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,504
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 238
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,035
<INCOME-TAX>                                       981
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,054
<DISCONTINUED>                                    (133)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       921
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .26



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF GENZYME DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, L.P. FOR THE SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             137
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   198
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     198
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              226
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        (26)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       198
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   122
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    52
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     72
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 72
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        72<F1>
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>GENZYME DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, L.P. IS A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP. NET
EARNINGS OR LOSS ARE REPORTED PER PARTNERSHIP UNIT INSTEAD OF PER SHARE. THE
PARTNERSHIP RECORDED NET INCOME OF $72,000 IN THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
2000 WHICH WAS ALLOCATED 1% TO THE GENERAL PARTNER AND 99% TO THE LIMITED
PARTNERS.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Order entered October 26, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-01364-CV

MUAMAR ANANI, HANADI ANANI, BIG D CONCRETE, INC., AND ANANI, LLC,

Appellants

V.

JOSEPH ABUZAID, Appellee

On Appeal from the 95th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-09866-D

ORDER

Before the Court is Appellants Muamar Anani, Hanadi Anani, Big D Concrete, Inc., and 

Anani LLC’s Motion to Reinstate. Appellants indicate that appellee Joseph Abuzaid opposes 

reinstatement of the appeal. 

Appellee Joseph Abuzaid shall file a response, if any, to appellants’ Motion to Reinstate 

By November 2, 2018.

/s/ DAVID J. SCHENCK 

JUSTICE
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

THEOTIS JEROME HOLLOMAN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-0684

[ July 13, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. 

Lucie County; Steven J. Levin, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562015CF003070A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and James W. McIntire, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, DAMOORGIAN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-40430

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ALVARO PARAMO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:10-CR-2073-1

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and HAYNES and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Alvaro Paramo pleaded guilty to attempting to smuggle goods from the

United States and making false statements. The district court sentenced

Paramo to 60 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. In

his sole issue for appeal, Paramo contends that there is a clerical error in the

judgment of the offense of conviction that should be remanded for correction.

The judgment states that Paramo was convicted of smuggling goods from

the United States and making false statements. Attempt offenses are distinct

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 6, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-40430 Document: 00511813963 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/06/2012
No. 11-40430

from actual offenses, even where both offenses appear in the same statute. See

United States v. Angeles-Mascote, 206 F.3d 529, 531 (5th Cir. 2000).

The case is remanded to the district court for the limited purpose of

correcting the original judgment to reflect that Paramo was convicted of

attempting to smuggle goods from the United States and making false

statements. See FED. R. CRIM. P. 36. The district court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED in all other respects. 

2

Case: 11-40430 Document: 00511813963 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/06/2012
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED November 6, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-10524 Summary Calendar

JESUS ANTONIO ARBALLO-MARQUEZ, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus STATE OF TEXAS, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:02-CV-00204

-------------------- Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jesus Antonio Arballo-Marquez (Arballo), currently federal prisoner # 33643-077, seeks to appeal the district court’s denial of his purported 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging a state court drug conviction that was used to enhance his current federal sentence for illegal reentry following deportation. The State of Texas, the respondent-appellee in this action, has moved for leave to supplement the record. This motion is GRANTED.No. 03-10524 -2- The respondent also moves for dismissal of the appeal, asserting that because the district court lacks jurisdiction, this court lacks jurisdiction as well. This court may review a district court’s determination that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over a case. See Home Builders Ass’n of Miss. v. City of Madison, Miss. , 143 F.3d 1006, 1010 (5th Cir. 1998). However, a review of the arguments presented by the respondents, of the appellate brief submitted by Arballo, and of the record reveal that Arballo’s arguments against the district court’s rulings are frivolous. Because Arballo is no longer “in custody” for his state sentences, he may not proceed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. See Pleasant v. Texas , 134 F.3d 1256, 1258 (5th Cir. 1998). Arballo may not proceed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 because he is challenging errors occurring before his trial and sentencing rather than the execution of his sentence. See Jeffers v. Chandler , 253 F.3d 827, 830 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 1001 (2001). Arballo may not proceed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 because he did not file his action in the sentencing court and because he did not name his current custodian as the respondent.
See 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ¶ 1; Pleasant , 134 F.3d at 1258. This court may dismiss an appeal upon review of an interlocutory motion if the appeal appears frivolous. 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. Therefore, the respondent’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and Arballo’s appeal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition is
DISMISSED.
§ 1.987-9 Recordkeeping requirements. ( a ) *In general.* A taxpayer that is an owner of a section 987 QBU shall keep a copy of each election made by the taxpayer in accordance with the rules of § 1.987-1(g)(3) (if not required to be made on a form published by the Commissioner regarding section 987) and such reasonable records as are sufficient to establish the section 987 QBU's taxable income or loss and section 987 gain or loss.
( b ) *Supplemental information.* An owner's obligation to maintain records under section 6001 and paragraph (a) of this section is not satisfied unless the following information is maintained in such records with respect to each section 987 QBU: ( 1 ) The amount of the items of income, gain, deduction, or loss attributed to the section 987 QBU in the functional currency of the section 987 QBU.
( 2 ) The amount of assets and liabilities attributed to the section 987 QBU in the functional currency of the section 987 QBU.
( 3 ) The exchange rates used to translate items of income, gain, deduction, or loss of the section 987 QBU into the owner's functional currency and, if a spot rate convention is used, the manner in which such convention is determined.
( 4 ) The exchange rates used to translate the assets and liabilities of the section 987 QBU into the owner's functional currency and, if a spot rate convention is used, the manner in which such convention is determined.
( 5 ) The amount of the items of income, gain, deduction, or loss attributed to the section 987 QBU translated into the functional currency of the owner.
( 6 ) The amount of assets and liabilities attributed to the section 987 QBU translated into the functional currency of the owner.
( 7 ) The amount of assets and liabilities transferred by the owner to the section 987 QBU determined in the functional currency of the owner.
( 8 ) The amount of assets and liabilities transferred by the section 987 QBU to the owner determined in the functional currency of the owner.
( 9 ) The amount of the unrecognized section 987 gain or loss for the taxable year.
( 10 ) The amount of the net accumulated unrecognized section 987 gain or loss at the close of the taxable year.
( 11 ) If a remittance is made, the computations determined under § 1.861-9T(g) for purposes of sourcing and characterizing the remittance under § 1.987-5.
( 12 ) The transition information required to be determined under § 1.987-10(e).
( c ) *Retention of records.* The records required by this section, or records that support the information required on a form published by the Commissioner regarding section 987, must be maintained and kept at all times available for inspection by the Internal Revenue Service for so long as the contents thereof may become relevant in the administration of the Internal Revenue Code.
( d ) *Information on a dedicated section 987 form.* The requirements of paragraph (b) of this section shall be satisfied if the taxpayer provides the specific information required on a form published by the Commissioner for this purpose.
[T.D. 9794, 81 FR 88845, Dec. 8, 2016]
Exhibit
10.58


SPX
CORPORATION


AMENDMENT
TO THE


SPX
CORPORATION SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN

FOR TOP MANAGEMENT


Pursuant
to the powers of amendment reserved in Section 6.1 of the SPX Corporation
Supplemental Retirement Plan for Top Management (the “Plan”), SPX Corporation
hereby amends the Plan in the following manner:


1.             Effective
as of October 2, 2006, the Plan is amended by adding the new Appendix K attached hereto to the end thereof.


2.             Effective
as of December 13, 2006, the Plan is amended by adding the new Appendix L attached hereto to the end thereof.













Appendix
K


Special
Provisions for Sharon K. Jenkins


Sharon K. Jenkins will be
treated (i) as though she were a participant in this Plan beginning on October
2, 2006, the date she was named an officer of SPX Corporation (i.e., Continuous Service shall commence as of such date) for
purposes of determining the amount of benefits payable to her under this Plan
and (ii) as though she were a participant in the SPX Qualified Plan for
purposes of determining the eligibility for benefits and the amount of benefits
under the Plan.













Appendix
L


Special
Provisions for James A. Peters


James A. Peters will be
treated as though he were a participant in this Plan beginning on December 13,
2006, the date he was named an officer of SPX Corporation (i.e.,
Continuous Service shall commence as of such date) for purposes of determining
the amount of benefits payable to him under this Plan.
----

Action brought on 26 October 2006 — Dálnoky v Commission

(Case F-120/06)

(2006/C 310/66)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Noémi Dálnoky (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: P. Horváth, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant, a Romanian citizen of Hungarian ethnicity and mother tongue, claims that the Notice of Open Competition EPSO/AD/47/06 is, by requiring that applicants must have a thorough knowledge of Romanian language, in breach of EC law on several points:

----

(1)OJ C 145 A, 21.6.2006

----
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 73 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 73

Recognizing and commending American airmen held as prisoners of war at 
    the Buchenwald concentration camp during World War II for their 
                    service, bravery, and fortitude.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 25, 1995

Mr. Hutchinson (for himself, Mr. Montgomery, and Mr. Edwards) submitted 
    the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing and commending American airmen held as prisoners of war at 
    the Buchenwald concentration camp during World War II for their 
                    service, bravery, and fortitude.
Whereas during World War II 173 Allied airmen were captured by the enemy and 
        held as prisoners of war at the Buchenwald concentration camp in Weimar, 
        Germany;
Whereas the captured airmen included 81 Americans, 27 Canadians, and 65 Britons, 
        Australians, and New Zealanders;
Whereas the facts and circumstances of their confinement are amply documented in 
        the official records maintained by the National Archives and Records 
        Administration;
Whereas a report from the International Red Cross concerning Stalag Luft III in 
        Sagan, Germany, mentioned six American airmen held at Buchenwald, 
        including one whose name does not appear on the lists maintained by the 
        National Archives;
Whereas since the liberation of Buchenwald in 1945 numerous personal memoirs, 
        scholarly books, and articles have been published describing the 
        conditions at the concentration camp;
Whereas this extensive documentation records the extraordinarily inhuman 
        treatment, deprivations, and personal suffering inflicted on prisoners 
        of war and other inmates at Buchenwald; and
Whereas Allied Governments and veterans organizations outside the United States 
        have granted special recognition to their citizens and servicemembers 
        who were held as prisoners of war in World War II concentration camps: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) recognizes and commends the American airmen held as 
        prisoners of war at the Buchenwald concentration camp during 
        World War II for their faithful service, personal bravery, and 
        exceptional fortitude; and
            (2) requests that the President issue a proclamation 
        recognizing and commending the service, bravery, and fortitude 
        of those airmen.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 21.1

 

SUBSIDIARIES OF OWL ROCK CAPITAL CORPORATION 

|               |   |         |
|--------------------|--------|--------------|
|               |   |         |
| Name               |   | Jurisdiction |
|               |   |         |
| OR LENDING LLC     |   | DELAWARE     |
|               |   |         |
| ORCC FINANCING LLC |   | DELAWARE     |
|               |   |         |
| OR DH LLC          |   | DELAWARE     |
|               |   |         |
|               |   |         |
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Jeffrey L. Garon, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Silicon Storage
Technology, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and
have:

1. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,  to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure control and procedures, as of the end of period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and
3. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

1. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

1. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
2. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: August 13, 2003



|/s/ Jeffrey L. Garon                                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Jeffrey L. Garon
Vice President Finance & Administration, Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary