alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 70

Expressing the sense of the Congress that members of the Screen Actors

Guild should contribute funds to a private, self-sustaining endowment

for the arts.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 18, 1995

Mr. CALVERT (for himself, Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, Mrs. CHENOWETH, Mr.

RADANOVICH, Mr. GUTKNECHT, Mr. STEARNS, Mr. BACHUS, and Mr.

WELLER) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that members of the

Screen Actors Guild should contribute funds to a private,

self-sustaining endowment for the arts.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),

Whereas the American people provide the motion picture industry with billions of dollars in annual sales receipts;

Whereas on March 27, 1995, the president of the Motion Picture Academy made a worldwide plea for Congress not to

cut funding for the National Endowment for the Arts;

and
2

•HCON 70 IH

Whereas the National Endowment for the Arts may potentially be privatized through legislative action: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 Screen Actors Guild should request that its members with

4 annual individual incomes over $1 million place 10 percent

5 of such income in an endowment for the arts to be admin6 istered by a privatized National Endowment for the Arts

7 when $1 billion has accumulated in the fund.

Æ
----

Euro exchange rates (1)

15 December 2006

(2006/C 308/02)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

----
#### §§ 1.822-1-1.822-2 [Reserved]
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.6072-1 Time for filing income tax returns.

For provisions relating to time for filing income tax returns, see §§ 1.6072-1 to 1.6072-4, inclusive, of this chapter (Income Tax Regulations).
/ 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA tH3 {['[; :~0 /~ ~~I 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

TRAVEL GROUP, INC., D/B/A REPUBLIC AIR TRAVEL 

AND SCOT SPENCER 

AIRLIFT GROUP, INC. 

AND RICHARD BERNARD 

Unauthorized Air Transportation, 

Unfair and Deceptive Practices and Unfair Methods of 

Competition, and Violations of Public Charter Rules 

EXPRESS ONE INTERNATIONAL, INC. 

Unfair and Deceptive Practices and Unfair Methods of 

Competition, and Violations of Public Charter Rules 

Enforcement Proceeding 

STATUS REPORT 

DOT -OST -1995-272 

formerly Docket 49233 

The Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and 

Proceedings ("Enforcement Office"), pursuant to Your Honor's March 22, 2006, Order 

staying this proceeding, files this report detailing the current status of this proceeding and 

settlement negotiations. 

The Department has not ruled on the outstanding motions filed by Respondents 

and opposed by the Enforcement Office in Ascend Aviation Group, Docket OST-2004-

17486. 
/ 

I 

' 

2 

There have been no further settlement discussions. 

Date: April 30, 2013 

Respectfully submitted, 

Samuel Podberesky 

Assistant General Counsel for 

Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings 

Vinh Q. Nguyen 

Senior Trial Attorney 

United States Department of Transportation 

Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Room 96-429 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: 202-366-9342 

FAJ(: 202-366-7152 
I /' 

• 

. 

3 

Docket No. DOT-OST-1995-272 

I hereby certify that on this 30th day of April, 2013, a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing Status Report was served in the following manner to the following: 

Original 

U.S. Department ofTransportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building Ground Floor 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

By First Class Mail 

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: (202) 366-2142 

FAX: (202) 366-7536 

By First Class Mail 

Scot Spencer 

SBD Aircraft Services 

255 S Leland Norton Way 

Sam Bernardino, CA 92408
Western Global Airlines, LLC 

5566 Broadcast Court 

Sarasota, FL 34620 

941-313-4781 

August 5, 2014 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations 

West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Subject: Request for Exemption to 14 CFR 121.434(3} (c) (1) (ii) 

Dear U.S. Department of Transportation, 

_/: -~ .. -.·.•.: - - - i 

Western Global Airlines, LLC ("WGA"}, holder of Air Carrier Certificate 9WGA495N, is requesting and 

exemption to 14 CFR 121.434(3} (c) (1) (ii), the requirement for a Pilot in Command completing initial or 

upgrade training to be observed by a Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") Inspector during at least 

one flight leg which includes takeoff and landing, during the Operating Experience as specified by 14 CFR 

121.434. 

WGA is requesting the FAA to permit WGA to substitute a qualified and authorized check airman in 

place of a FAA inspector to observe a qualifying pilot in command who is completing the initial or 

upgrade training specified in Section 121.424 during at least one flight leg that includes a takeoff and a 

landing. 

WGA's business is predominantly engaged in international flying. Requiring a FAA inspector to conduct 

the observation would result in a substantial burden on both the FAA and WGA due to the thirty day 

lead time required for an FAA Inspector to obtain foreign country clearance. WGA proposes three check 

airmen be designated this authority. 

Granting this exemption is in the public interest in that it allows the FAA to utilize Inspectors for more 

immediate needs and should also provide financial savings in avoiding FAA inspector travel expense. 

$~~ Thorias J. Que hi 

Vice President, Operations 

Cc: William Royal, FAA POl, CMO 67
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS              
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         998,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,491,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   236,000
<INVENTORY>                                  8,836,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,583,000
<PP&E>                                       8,827,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,535,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              31,968,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,172,000
<BONDS>                                      3,335,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          811,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,882,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                31,968,000
<SALES>                                      7,707,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,707,000
<CGS>                                        6,234,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,234,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (6,000)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             198,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (599,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (603,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0 
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                 (603,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)
        

</TABLE>
§ 20.6161-2 Extension of time for paying deficiency in tax. ( a ) In any case in which the district director finds that payment, on the date prescribed therefor, of any part of a deficiency would impose undue hardship upon the estate, he may extend the time for payment for a period or periods not to exceed one year for any one period and for all periods not to exceed four years from the date prescribed for payment thereof. However, see § 20.6161-1 for extensions of time for payment of the part of a deficiency which is prorated to installments under the provisions of section 6166.
( b ) The extension will not be granted upon a general statement of hardship. The term “undue hardship” means more than an inconvenience to the estate. It must appear that a substantial financial loss, for example, due to the sale of property at a sacrifice price, will result to the estate from making payment of the deficiency at the date prescribed therefor. If a market exists, a sale of property at the current market price is not ordinarily considered as resulting in an undue hardship. No extension will be granted if the deficiency is due to negligence or intentional disregard of rules and regulations or to fraud with intent to evade the tax.
( c ) An application for such an extension must be in writing and must contain, or be supported by, information in a written statement declaring that it is made under penalties of perjury showing the undue hardship that would result to the estate if the extension were refused. The application, with the supporting information, must be filed with the district director. When received, it will be examined, and, if possible, within thirty days will be denied, granted, or tentatively granted subject to certain conditions of which the executor will be notified. The district director will not consider an application for such an extension unless it is applied for on or before the date prescribed for payment of the deficiency, as shown by the notice and demand from the district director. If the executor desires to obtain an additional extension, it must be applied for on or before the date of the expiration of the previous extension. The granting of the extension of time for paying the deficiency is discretionary with the district director.
( d ) The amount of the deficiency for which an extension is granted, with the additions thereto, shall be paid on or before the expiration of the period of extension without the necessity of notice and demand from the district director.
( e ) The granting of an extension of time for paying the deficiency will not operate to prevent the running of interest. See section 6601. An extension of time to pay the deficiency may extend the period within which State and foreign death taxes allowed as a credit under sections 2011 and 2014 are required to be paid and the credit therefor claimed. See paragraph (c) of § 20.2011-1 and § 20.2014-6.
( f ) For provisions requiring the furnishing of security for the payment of the deficiency for which an extension is granted, see § 20.6165-1.
[T.D. 6296, 23 FR 4529, June 24, 1958, as amended by T.D. 6522, 25 FR 13885, Dec. 29, 1960]
##### 



Exhibit 11

POTASH CORPORATION OF SASKATCHEWAN INC.
COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31

(Figures and amounts expressed in millions, except
per share amounts)

|  |  |                                                                           |  |      |            |      |  |   |            |  
|- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ---------- | ---- |  | - | ---------- | -
|  |  |                                                                           |  | 2002 |            | 2001
|  |  |                                                                           |  |      |            |     
|A |  | Net income as reported, Canadian GAAP                                     |  | $    | 12.8       |      |  | $ | 62.4       |  
|B |  | Items adjusting net income                                                |  | $    | 1.3        |      |  | $ | (5.0       | )
|C |  | Net income, US GAAP                                                       |  | $    | 14.1       |      |  | $ | 57.4       |  
|D |  | Weighted average number of shares outstanding                             |  |      | 51,960,000 |      |  |   | 51,860,000 |  
|E |  | Net additional shares issuable for diluted
earnings per share calculation |  |      | 258,000    |      |  |   | 373,000    |  
|  |  | CANADIAN GAAP                                                             |  |      |            |      |  |   |            |  
|  |  | Basic earnings per share (A/D)                                            |  | $    | 0.25       |      |  | $ | 1.20       |  
|  |  | Diluted earnings per share ((A/(D+E)                                      |  | $    | 0.24       |      |  | $ | 1.19       |  
|  |  | UNITED STATES GAAP                                                        |  |      |            |      |  |   |            |  
|  |  | Basic earnings per share (C/D)                                            |  | $    | 0.27       |      |  | $ | 1.11       |  
|  |  | Diluted earnings per share ((C/(D+E))                                     |  | $    | 0.27       |      |  | $ | 1.10       |
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 150 (Thursday, August 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 39379]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18783]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of New York, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New 
Hampshire, Vermont and Maine)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, 
ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, September 15, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Audrey Y. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 
718-488-2085.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Tuesday, September 15, 2009, at 10 a.m. Eastern Time via telephone 
conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, 
notification of intent to participate must be made with Audrey Y. 
Jenkins. For more information please contact Ms. Jenkins at 1-888-912-
1227 or 718-488-2085, or write TAP Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 625 
Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or contact us at the Web site: 
http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: July 30, 2009.
Shawn F. Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E9-18783 Filed 8-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
----

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 14 December 2006 — Branco v Commission

(Case T-162/04) (1)

(European Social Fund (ESF) - Reduction of financial assistance - Subcontracting - Reasonable time)

(2006/C 331/75)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Eugénio Branco, Lda (Lisbon, Portugal) (represented by: B. Belchior, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: P. Guerra e Andrade and A. Weimar, Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of the decision of the Commission of 8 August 2003 reducing the assistance of the European Social Fund (ESF) and, therefore, rejecting the application for payment of the balance of the assistance from the ESF, initially approved for operational program 87 03 01 P1.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

----

(1)OJ C 217, 28.8.2004.

----
—————

Map created February 92016

Map Projection: NAD 83 Oregon
‘and Washington

+8

—~ Stream

“= Government Camp - Cooper Spur
Land Exchange, February 2016

WP Land to be acquired by USFS Nu» Highways
WH UsFs Land tobe Conveyed “_ Road

US Forest Service
2) wicemess
Private

National
Forest

OREGON
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Jeffrey L. Garon, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Silicon Storage
Technology, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and
have:

1. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,  to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure control and procedures, as of the end of period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and
3. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

1. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

1. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
2. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: November 13, 2003



|/s/ Jeffrey L. Garon                                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Jeffrey L. Garon
Vice President Finance & Administration, Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8063 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8063

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 9, 2024

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To authorize the Secretary of the Army to posthumously award the 
   Distinguished Service Cross to William D. Owens for his valorous 
 actions from June 6, 1944, to June 8, 1944, during World War II at La 
    Fiere Bridge in Normandy, France, while serving with the 505th 
                          Parachute Infantry.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION FOR POSTHUMOUS AWARD OF THE DISTINGUISHED 
              SERVICE CROSS TO WILLIAM D. OWENS FOR ACTS OF VALOR AT LA 
              FIERE BRIDGE.

    (a) Waiver of Time Limitations.--Notwithstanding the time 
limitations specified in section 7274 of title 10, United States Code, 
or any other time limitation with respect to the awarding of certain 
medals to persons who served in the Armed Forces, the Secretary of the 
Army may award the Distinguished Service Cross under section 7272 of 
such title to William D. Owens for the acts of valor at La Fiere Bridge 
described in subsection (b).
    (b) Acts of Valor Described.--The acts of valor referred to in 
subsection (a) are the actions of William D. Owens from June 6, 1944, 
to June 8, 1944, at La Fiere Bridge for which he was previously awarded 
the Bronze Star Medal.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 8, 2024.

            Attest:

                                             KEVIN F. MCCUMBER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Credit Suisse First BostonMortgage Securities Corp. 

11 MADISON AVE

NEW YORK, New York 10010-3643

 

Re:  Annual Statement ofCompliance for Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp., CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C4

 

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of November 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned,a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as CertificateAdministrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of andfor the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

 February 27, 2017

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|