alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Bonnie RIFFLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. George BRADSHAW, Sergeant; Larry Bradley, Captain; Charles Platt, Trooper; J.C. Spriggs, Sergeant; Gary Edgell, Colonel, West Virginia State Police; West Virginia State Police, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-1272.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 13, 2002.

Decided June 18, 2002.

Bonnie Riffle, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey Kent Phillips, Steptoe *&*Johnson, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Bonnie Riffle appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Riffle v. Bradshaw,*No. CA-01-62-3 (N.D.W.Va. Jan. 28, 2002); *see also Heck v. Humphrey, 512*U.S. 477, 486-87, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 229

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Directing the Secretary of the Senate to make

corrections in the enrollment of S. 1004.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 229

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That, in the enrollment of the bill S. 1004,

3 the Secretary of the Senate shall make the following cor4 rections:

5 (1) In section 1106(c), in the text added to sec6 tion 5 of the Act of January 2, 1951—
2

•HCON 229 EH

1 (A) strike ‘‘This section does not prohibit,

2 nor may any State make’’ and insert in lieu

3 thereof ‘‘With respect to a vessel operating in

4 Alaska, this section does not prohibit, nor may

5 the State of Alaska make’’;

6 (B) strike ‘‘except that a State may’’ and

7 insert in lieu thereof ‘‘except that such State

8 may’’; and

9 (C) strike paragraph (2) and insert in lieu

10 thereof the following:

11 ‘‘(2) A voyage referred to in paragraph (1) is a voy12 age that—

13 ‘‘(A) includes a stop in Canada or in a State

14 other than the State of Alaska;

15 ‘‘(B) includes stops in at least 2 different ports

16 situated in the State of Alaska; and

17 ‘‘(C) is of at least 60 hours duration.’’.

18 (2) In section 1113(d), in the text added to sec19 tion 12106 of title 46, United States Code, in sub-
3

•HCON 229 EH

1 section (e)(1)(E) strike ‘‘section 12102’’ and insert

2 in lieu thereof ‘‘this section’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 28,

1996.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### § 1.663(a)-2 Charitable, etc., distributions.

Any amount paid, permanently set aside, or to be used for the charitable, etc., purposes specified in section 642(c) and which is allowable as a deduction under that section is not allowed as a deduction to an estate or trust under section 661 or treated as an amount distributed for purposes of determining the amounts includible in gross income of beneficiaries under section 662. Amounts paid, permanently set aside, or to be used for charitable, etc., purposes are deductible by estates or trusts only as provided in section 642(c). For purposes of this section, the deduction provided in section 642(c) is computed without regard to the provisions of section 508(d), section 681, or section 4948(c)(4) (concerning unrelated business income and private foundations).

[T.D. 6500, 25 FR 11814, Nov. 26, 1960, as amended by T.D. 7428, 41 FR 34627, Aug. 16, 1976]
IV

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 76

Expressing respect and affection for the flag of the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 14, 1995

Mr. SKAGGS (for himself and Mr. KOLBE) submitted the following concurrent

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing respect and affection for the flag of the United

States.

Whereas freedom and liberty protected by the Constitution

are fundamental and precious rights of each American;

Whereas the flag of the United States is an historic and revered symbol of that freedom and liberty;

Whereas generations of Americans have fought with valor

under the flag to protect the sacred values it represents;

Whereas all the people of the United States, and their representatives in Congress, should show respect and affection for the flag;

Whereas the flag has been a source of inspiration for freedom-seeking people around the world;
2

•HCON 76 IH

Whereas deeply held respect and affection for the flag have

caused many to propose an amendment to the Constitution to protect the flag from desecration; and

Whereas an amendment to the Constitution, expanding the

powers of government to prohibit offensive behavior,

would entail a limitation on freedoms previously protected

under the First Amendment: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress of the United States ex3 presses deep respect and affection for the flag of the

4 United States, and states its abiding trust in the freedom

5 and liberty which the flag symbolizes.

Æ
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10 (r)  


 
  ROLLINS, INC.
  
    FIRST AMENDMENT TO
  1994 EMPLOYEE STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
  AND
  1998 EMPLOYEE STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN    
    


Rollins, Inc.
(the "Company"), a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, by resolution of its Board of Directors has adopted this First Amendment to its 1994 Employee
Stock Incentive Plan and its 1998 Employee Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plans"), effective as of July 25, 2006. 



	1.
	Each
of the Plans is hereby amended to the extent necessary to provide as follows: 



If
the outstanding shares of common stock of Rollins, Inc. (the "Company") are changed into or exchanged for a different number or kind of shares or other securities of the Company by reason of
any recapitalization, reclassification, stock split, stock dividend, combination or subdivision of the common stock of the Company, or similar transaction involving the outstanding equity interests in
the Company (each, a "Change in Capitalization"), then, subject to any required action by the stockholders of the Company, the number and kind of shares of Company stock underlying each stock option,
restricted stock award, or other equity award (and, where applicable, the exercise price per share) shall be proportionately and equitably adjusted for any increase or decrease in the number of issued
shares of the Company resulting from a Change in Capitalization, such adjustments to be effected in the manner reasonably determined by the Committee. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no fractional
shares shall be issued in making the foregoing adjustments. This provision shall be effective immediately upon adoption by the Board of Directors and apply to all currently outstanding equity awards
under each of the Plans. 



	2.
	All
provisions of the Plans remain in effect except to the extent superseded by the foregoing. 






IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board has caused this Plan to be executed by a duly authorized officer of the Company as of the date set forth above. 



	 	 	ROLLINS, INC.
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	















QuickLinks


ROLLINS, INC. FIRST AMENDMENT TO 1994 EMPLOYEE STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN AND 1998 EMPLOYEE STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
Filed: May 11, 1999 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6498 (CA-98-702-S)

Leamon L. Tatum, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus Division of Corrections, et al, Defendants - Appellees.

ORDER The court amends its opinion filed March 4, 1999, as follows: On page 3, footnote *, lines 2 and 3 -- the dates of “May 16" and “May 17" are corrected to read “March 16" and “March 17,” respectively. For the Court - By Direction
/s/ Patricia S. Connor ClerkUNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6498

LEAMON L. TATUM, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS; RICHARD A. LANHAM, SR.; F. NASTI, Citation Adjuster; JAMES H. ASHBY, Citation Adjuster; T. PRICE, Citation Adjuster; WESTERN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; FRANK C. SIZER, JR., Warden; E. J. SCHEWE, ARP Coordinator; P. KNIGHT, Classification; CMSNIMES, Classification; R. GROVE, Classification; J. F. WHISER, JR., CO II; D. COWAN, CO II; L. C. REAMS, CO II; S. BOWMAN, CO II; H.EDMISTON, CO II; C. DETRICK, CO II; C. MCKENZIE, CO II; J. JOHNSON, CO II; D. STEWART, Ltd.; K. SHOOK, CO II; CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SYSTEMS; DEBORAH PULLER, Psych Associate; JANET HENDERSHOT, Doctor; BRUCE LILLER, Psych Associate, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA98-702-S) Submitted: December 15, 1998 Decided: March 4, 1999 Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.3 Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Leamon L. Tatum, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although the district court’s order of judgment is marked as “filed” on March 16, 1998, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on March 17, 1998. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was physically entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 4 PER CURIAM: Leamon L. Tatum appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Tatum v. Division of Corrections , No. CA-98- 702-S (D. Md. Mar. 17, 1998). * We also deny Tatum’s motions for discovery and for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
OFFICE OF THE A’ l-I ’ ORNEY GENERAL **OF** TEXAS **AUSTIN**

StateCow-d of Barber Exaridriers Xustin,

Texas GeRtlQlEQn: bor Examiners. \\ the State TressuAyr' is paid from and aai: the
all State departments

State runas." Zeveriue Buni. If it had been the le@.slative intent to apply th? Act also to State de~art~entisauogo~ted exolusivelyby - aPProprintions

from spaoiel funds, foes, and looalreceipts, it zould csem that the Legislaturewould merely have provided thEt the Aot should opgly to ell Stat0 departments exoept the eeucstional

institutionsof the State.-...

state Emrd of Barber Examiners, Paae 2

Ye therofore construethe Act as exoludingfrom Its operationthose State dopartmcntowhich are financed s~~~usivaly

from spccinl funds. Therefore, in our opinion, the provisionsof Se3atte 6111 No. 190 do not apply to the stateBoard of Ejnrber.Exa%iners. Yours very tNly ATMRXIX Gl!i?WV& OF TICXAS R. ST. Fairchild Aaaistant RXZ:pbp
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

COREY LEE MCLENDON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 159 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 26th day of December, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
!

!

!

!

!

!

¬«3

£¤97

§ ̈¦5

¬«96

§ ̈¦5

Happy Camp

Callahan

Ft. Jones

Yreka

Weed

Goosenest

The Klamath National Forest cannot assure the acuracy of this information

for a particular purpose. Original data may have been compiled from various

sources. Spatial information may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards.

This information may be updated without notification.

Project Area

Klamath NF Rouge River - Siskiyou NF

T45 N

R11 W

T45 N

R10 W

T45 N R11 W

T46 N R11 W

T46 N

R10 W

T46 N

R9 W

T46 N R10 W

T47 N R10 W

T46 N R10 W

T45 N R10 W

T46 N

R10 W

T46 N

R11 W

T46 N

R9 W

T47 N

R9 W

T47 N

R10 W

T47 N

R11 W

T47 N

R10 W

T47 N

R9 W

T46 N

R11 W

T47 N

R11 W

20

33

16

27

2

35

14

11

12

12

36

6

21

9

15

11

12

1

24

7

5

21

16

28

14

18

31

19

7

8

16

4

10

3

23

1

24

30

7

19

5

8

4

15

22

15

2

11

23

35

30

7

18

7

29

32

29

5

28

4

34

22

22

10

36

25

13

7

6

6

32

9

33

3 2

2

23

24

31

24

9

11

26

2

35

12

12

31

31

8

28

10

10

26

5

33

4

27

27

11

1

6

6

29

8

32

20

5

4

3

3

10

25

1

30

6

20

17

5

16

33

3

34

3

2

23

2

25

18

29

9

9

34

34

11

36

26 25

1

1

13

6

9

35

26

14

36

7

17

17

21

4

27

22

13

1

19

12

32

17

8

20

8

28

21

15

10

14

13

19

30

18

118.94

118.95

117.24

115.38

118.96

118.93

118.97

115.33

116.50

118.62

117.20 117.21

117.19

118.80

117.22

115.34

115.32

115.32

116.49

118.63 118.63

118.57

115.33

117.23

115.35

HORSE CREEK COMMUNITY PROTECTION AND FOREST RESTORATION PROJECT

ALTERNATIVE 3

Happy Camp/Oak Knoll Ranger District

Klamath National Forest

Da

®

te: 3/8/2017

0 0.5 1 2

Miles

Horse Creek Project Alternative 3

Salvage Harvest Skyline (Cable)

Salvage Harvest Ground-Based

Site Preparation and Planting (without salvage)

HorseCreekSIA

Fuel Zone 1

Roadside Fuels Treatment

Private Property 1

Project Boundary

Roadside Hazard Tree Removal

SIA Temporary Roads
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Frederick Sullivan

*Peter J. Zaccagnino,Jr.,*in support of the petition.

*James D. Mirabile,*assistant prosecuting attorney, in opposition.

Decided February 18, 1964

Consideration of the petition for certification is refused until the copies of the record have been amended to include the opinion of the Appellate Division legibly reproduced on one side only of each page and until the certification appearing below the opinion at the bottom of page 8 has been amended to show that the opinion is a final opinion and is subject to change only in matters of form and then only with the approval of the Reporter of Judicial Decisions.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of CEN Biotech, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I, Joseph Byrne, Chief Executive Officer, do hereby certify, to my knowledge:

 

(1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

| Date: April 17, 2018 |                    |
|----------------------|-------------------------|
|                 |                    |   |
| By:                  | */s/**Joseph Byrne*     |   |
|                 | Joseph Byrne            |   |
|                 | Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to CEN Biotech, Inc. and will be retained by CEN Biotech, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 272

Authorizing the taking of a photograph in the Chamber of the United States

Senate.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 28 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Mr. MITCHELL (for himself and Mr. DOLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Authorizing the taking of a photograph in the Chamber

of the United States Senate.

1 Resolved, That paragraph 1 of Rule IV of the Rules

2 for the Regulation of the Senate Wing of the United

3 States Capitol (prohibiting the taking of pictures in the

4 Senate Chamber) be temporarily suspended for the sole

5 and specific purpose of permitting an official photograph

6 to be taken of the United States Senate in actual session

7 on a date and time to be announced by the Majority Lead8 er after consultation with the Republican Leader.

9 SEC. 2. The Sergeant at Arms of the Senate is au10 thorized and directed to make the necessary arrangements
2

•SRES 272 IS

1 therefor, which arrangements shall provide for a minimum

2 of disruption to Senate proceedings.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 146 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 146

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the 1996 Special Olympics Torch Relay to be run through the 
                            Capitol Grounds.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 146

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF RUNNING OF SPECIAL OLYMPICS TORCH RELAY 
              THROUGH CAPITOL GROUNDS.

    On May 24, 1996, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House 
of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate may 
jointly designate, the 1996 Special Olympics Torch Relay may be run 
through the Capitol Grounds, as part of the journey of the Special 
Olympics torch to the District of Columbia Special Olympics summer 
games at Gallaudet University in the District of Columbia.

SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

    The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as may be 
necessary to carry out section 1.

SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS.

    The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions for physical 
preparations for the event authorized by section 1.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 26, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,081,986
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,107,367
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,095,785
<PP&E>                                       1,025,273
<DEPRECIATION>                                 326,172
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,994,782
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,875,369
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,701
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,169,279
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,994,783
<SALES>                                      9,858,680
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,858,680
<CGS>                                        7,024,257
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,024,257
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,630,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                287,318
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (36,754)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            324,073
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   324,073
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Covalent Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth M. Borow, M.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Kenneth M. Borow, M.D.           
|Kenneth M. Borow, M.D.               
|President and Chief Executive Officer



May
14, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          60,142
<SECURITIES>                                     1,398
<RECEIVABLES>                                      194
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,058
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                63,008
<PP&E>                                          58,271
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,441
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 104,589
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,992
<BONDS>                                         86,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      6,538
<COMMON>                                        75,032
<OTHER-SE>                                    (81,354)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   104,589
<SALES>                                            913
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,138
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,851
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,392
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (23,355)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (23,355)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (23,355)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.74)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.74)
        


</TABLE>