alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 153

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 11, 1996

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),
2

HCON 153 RDS

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF SOAP BOX DERBY RACES

2 ON CAPITOL GROUNDS.

3 The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby Associa4 tion (hereinafter in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘As5 sociation’’) shall be permitted to sponsor a public event,

6 soap box derby races, on the Capitol grounds on July 13,

7 1996, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House

8 of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the

9 Senate may jointly designate.

10 SEC. 2. CONDITIONS.

11 The event to be carried out under this resolution shall

12 be free of admission charge to the public and arranged

13 not to interfere with the needs of Congress, under condi14 tions to be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol and

15 the Capitol Police Board; except that the Association shall

16 assume full responsibility for all expenses and liabilities

17 incident to all activities associated with the event.

18 SEC. 3. STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.

19 For the purposes of this resolution, the Association

20 is authorized to erect upon the Capitol grounds, subject

21 to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, such stage,

22 sound amplification devices, and other related structures

23 and equipment as may be required for the event to be car24 ried out under this resolution.
3

HCON 153 RDS

1 SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

2 The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police

3 Board are authorized to make any such additional ar4 rangements that may be required to carry out the event

5 under this resolution.

Passed the House of Representatives June 10, 1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.

By JEFF TRANDAHL,

Assistant to the Clerk.
§ 1.382-7 Built-in gains and losses. ( a ) *Treatment of prepaid income.* For purposes of section 382(h), prepaid income is not recognized built-in gain. The term *prepaid income* means any amount received prior to the change date that is attributable to performance occurring on or after the change date. Examples to which this paragraph (a) will apply include, but are not limited to, income received prior to the change date that is deferred under section 455 or Rev. Proc. 2004-34 (2004-1 CB 991 (June 1, 2004)) (or any successor revenue procedure) (see § 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b)).
( b ) *Effective/applicability dates.* This section applies to loss corporations that have undergone an ownership change on or after June 11, 2010. For loss corporations that have undergone an ownership change before June 11, 2010, see § 1.382-7T as contained in 26 CFR part 1, revised April 1, 2009.
( c ) [Reserved]
( d ) *Special rules.* This paragraph (d) contains special rules regarding the identification of recognized built-in losses. ( 1 ) - ( 4 ) [Reserved]
( 5 ) *Section 382 disallowed business interest carryforwards.* Section 382 disallowed business interest carryforwards are not treated as recognized built-in losses.
( e ) - ( f ) [Reserved]
( g ) *Applicability dates.* ( 1 ) - ( 3 ) [Reserved]
( 4 ) *Paragraph (d)(5) of this section.* Paragraph (d)(5) of this section applies with respect to an ownership change occurring on or after November 13, 2020. For loss corporations that have undergone an ownership change before or after November 13, 2020, see § 1.382-7 as contained in 26 CFR part 1, revised April 1, 2019. However, taxpayers and their related parties, within the meaning of sections 267(b) and 707(b)(1), may choose to apply the rules of paragraph (d)(5) of this section to testing dates occurring during a taxable year beginning after December 31, 2017.
[T.D. 9487, 75 FR 33992, June 16, 2010, as amended by T.D. 9870, 84 FR 33692, July 15, 2019; T.D. 9905, 85 FR 56837, Sept. 14, 2020]
EXHIBIT 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                   OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Giant Industries, Inc.
("Giant") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Fred L. Holliger, Chief Executive Officer of Giant,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (a) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (b) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Giant.


                             By: /s/ FRED L. HOLLIGER
                                --------------------------------
                             Name:   Fred L. Holliger
                             Title:  Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 12, 2004.
#### § 1.910 [Reserved]
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.6031(a)-1 Return of partnership income.

For provisions relating to the requirement of returns of partnership income, see § 1.6031(a)-1 of this chapter.

[T.D. 8841, 64 FR 61502, Nov. 12, 1999]
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-20659

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JULIO CESAR AGUILAR-PEREZ

Defendant-Appellant

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-01-CR-851-1

-------------------- March 18, 2003

Before JONES, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Julio Cesar Aguilar-Perez appeals his sentence after pleading

guilty to illegally reentering this country, in violation of 8

U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b)(2). Aguilar argues that the district court

erred in applying an eight-level increase to his base offense level

for a prior conviction for simple possession of cocaine. He argues

that mere possession is not an aggravated felony under the

Sentencing Guidelines. This argument is foreclosed by our decisionNo. 02-20659

-2-

in United States v. Caicedo-Cuero , 312 F.3d 697, 706-09 (5th Cir.

2002). There we held that simple drug possession is an aggravated

felony under 8 U.S.C. § 1 326(b)(2) and U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2. I d. at

708.

Aguilar also argues that the term “aggravated felony” is

unconstitutionally vague and that the rule of lenity should operate

to reduce his sentence. The meaning of “aggravated felony” is

unambiguous; the rule of lenity is not applicable here. S ee United

States v. Rivera

, 265 F.3d 310, 312 (5th Cir. 2001) (citing United

States v. Hinojosa-Lopez , 130 F.3d 691, 693-94 (5th Cir. 1997)).

The district court did not err when it increased Aguilar’s base

offense level by eight levels due to his pri or possession

conviction.

Next, Aguilar argues that the district court erred by not

stating in open court its reasons for sentencing him to 37 months’

imprisonment within a guideline range of 30 to 37 months. When, as

here, the spread of an applicable Guideline range is less than 24

months, the district court is not required to state its reasons for

imposing a sentence at a particul ar point within the applicable

range. S ee United States v. Matovsky

, 935 F.2d 719, 721 (5th Cir.

1991).

Last, Aguilar argues that the district court erred when it

denied his request for a downward departure. We review a refusal

to depart only if the district court erroneously believed it lacked

the authority to depart. U nited States v. Davis

, 226 F.3d 346, 359No. 02-20659

-3-

(5th Cir. 2000). There must be “something in the record [to]

indicate that the district court held such an e rroneous belief.”

United States v. Landerman

, 167 F.3d 895, 899 (5th Cir. 1999).

There is no indica tion in the record that the court believed it

lacked authority to depart. The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED

.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                   Exhibit 10.40

  SUMMARY OF THE REGISTRANT'S COMPENSATORY ARRANGEMENTS WITH EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name and Title                                                    Base Salary
--------------                                                    -----------
<S>                                                               <C>
Paul Sagan                                                        $400,000
President and CEO-Elect

J. Donald Sherman                                                 $300,000
Senior Vice President - CFO-Elect

George Conrades                                                   $ 40,000(1)
Executive Chairman

Melanie Haratunian                                                $240,000
Vice President and General Counsel

Robert Hughes                                                     $350,000
Executive Vice President - Global Sales, Services and Marketing

Tom Leighton                                                      $ 20,000
Chief Scientist

Chris Schoettle                                                   $300,000
Executive Vice President - Technology, Networks and Support

Cathy Welsh                                                       $220,000
Chief Human Resources Officer
</TABLE>

----------
(1)  Reflects cash compensation for serving as Executive Chairman of the Board
     of Directors
----

Notification from the Norwegian authorities concerning regionally differentiated social security contributions

The EFTA Surveillance Authority has decided not to raise objections against the notified measure

(2006/C 305/11)

Date of adoption: 

EFTA State: Norway

Case No: 59280

Title: Regionally differentiated social security contributions

Objective: Reduce or prevent depopulation in the least populated regions in Norway by stimulating employment in these regions

Legal basis: Article 1 of the yearly Resolution of the Parliament on rates for social security contributions etc, and Section 23-2 of Act No 19 of 28 February 1997 relating to the National Insurance Scheme (Folketrygdloven)

Budget: Approximately NOK 8 billion (approximately EUR 1 billion) annually

Duration: From 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2013

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://www.eftasurv.int/fieldsofwork/fieldstateaid/stateaidregistry/

----
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 109 Introduced in House (IH)]

                                     

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 109

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
  establishing English as the official language of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 28, 1995

  Mr. Doolittle (for himself, Mr. Hancock, Mr. Hansen, and Mr. Shays) 
 introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
  establishing English as the official language of the United States.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The English language shall be the official language of 
the United States. As the official language, the English language shall 
be used for all public acts including every order, resolution, vote or 
election, and for all records and judicial proceedings of the 
Government of the United States and the governments of the several 
States.
    ``Section 2. The Congress and the States shall enforce this article 
by appropriate legislation.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 150 (Thursday, August 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39378-39379]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18781]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notice Improvement Issue 
Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notice 
Improvement Issue Committee will be

[[Page 39379]]

conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, 
ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, September 10, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sallie Chavez at 1-888-912-1227, or 
954-423-7979.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal
    Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting 
of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notice Improvement Issue Committee will 
be held Thursday, September 10, 2009, at 2 p.m. Eastern Time via 
telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or 
submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference 
lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Sallie 
Chavez. For more information please contact Ms. Chavez at 1-888-912-
1227 or 954-423-7979, or write TAP Office, 1000 South Pine Island Road, 
Suite 340, Plantation, FL 33324, or post comments to the Web site: 
http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: July 30, 2009.
Shawn F. Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E9-18781 Filed 8-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
exv10w13



 





EXHIBIT
10.13




VCA
ANTECH INC.

SUMMARY OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS COMPENSATION



          The
following table sets forth the Company’s current compensation
arrangements with its non-employee directors.





	 	 	 
	Annual Retainer:

	 	$10,000 per annum

(payable in 4 equal quarterly installments)
	 
	 	 
	In
Person Board or

Committee Meeting:

	 	$2,000 per meeting
	 
	 	 
	Telephonic Board or 

Committee Meeting:

	 	$1,000
	 
	 	 
	Audit Committee Chair Fee:

	 	$10,000 per annum

(payable in 4 equal quarterly installments)
	 
	 	 
	Equity Compensation:

	 	Upon appointment to the Board of
Directors, each non-employee director will
receive a grant, under our 2006 Equity
Incentive Plan, of 2,000 restricted shares
of stock.
	 
	 	 
	 

	 	These restricted shares will vest in three equal annual installments,
in each of the three 12-month periods (each an “annual period”)
following the date of grant on that day during such annual period which is the earlier to occur
of (a) the day immediately preceding the date of an annual meeting of the Company’s
stockholders occurring during such annual period and (b) on the anniversary of the date of grant.
	 
	 	 
	 

	 	In the event that the date of grant
is fewer than 12 months prior to the date
of the next annual meeting, the number of
shares granted will be reduced on a pro-rata basis, based
upon the number of months until the next annual meeting (e.g., if a
non-employee director is appointed January 1 and the next annual
meeting is April 1, such non-employee director will receive
500 restricted shares).
	 
	 	 
	 

	 	Each non-employee director will annually
receive a grant of 2,000 restricted
shares on the date of the annual meeting.
	 
	 	 
	 

	 	These restricted shares will vest in three equal annual
installments, in each of the three annual periods following the date of
grant on that day during such annual period which is the earlier to occur of (a) the day
immediately preceding the date of an annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders occurring during
such annual period and (b) on the anniversary of the date of grant.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Office of the Secretary

Notice is hereby given in accordance with Section 552b of Title 5, United States Code, that a meeting of the John H. Chafee Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission will be held on Thursday, September 17, 2009.

The Commission was established pursuant to Public Law 99-647. The purpose of the Commission is to assist federal, state and local authorities in the development and implementation of an integrated resource management plan for those lands and waters within the Corridor.

The meeting will convene on September 17, 2009 at 9 a.m. at the Jesse M. Smith Memorial Library located at 100 Tinkham Lane, Harrisville, RI for the following reasons:

1. Approval of Minutes.

2. Chairman's Report.

3. Executive Director's Report.

4. Financial Budget.

5. Public Input.

It is anticipated that about thirty people will be able to attend the session in addition to the Commission members.

Interested persons may make oral or written presentations to the Commission or file written statements. Such requests should be made prior to the meeting to:

Jan H. Reitsma, Executive Director, John H. Chafee, Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission, One Depot Square, Woonsocket, RI 02895, Tel.: (401) 762-0250.

Further information concerning this meeting may be obtained from Jan H. Reitsma, Executive Director of the Commission at the aforementioned address.

Jan H. Reitsma,

Executive Director, BRVNHCC. 

[FR Doc. E9-18936 Filed 9-9-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-RK-P
**Exhibit 32**     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of PotashCorporation of Saskatchewan Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge,that:     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the “Form 10-Q”),of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated:  November8, 2005           /s/ William J. Doyle    William J. Doyle    *President and Chief Executive Officer*   Dated:  November8, 2005           /s/ Wayne R. Brownlee    Wayne R. Brownlee    *Senior Vice President, Treasurer, and ChiefFinancial Officer*        The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item601(6)(32) of Regulation S-K, section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not beingfiled as part of the Form 10-Q.
3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      31,990,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              264,667,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 8,620,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           317,738,000
<PP&E>                                      49,418,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              37,454,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             406,330,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      221,077,000
<BONDS>                                    141,624,000<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       243,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  36,357,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               406,330,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           305,256,000<F2>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              268,455,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               667,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,821,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,105,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,149,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            445,000 
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   445,000 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02 
<FN>
<F1>Excludes current portion of bonds, mortgages, and similar debt.
<F2>Represents gross revenue which includes costs of certain services 
subcontracted to third parties and other reimbursable direct project costs, such
as materials procured by the Company on behalf of its customers.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### § 1.818-1 Taxable years affected.

Sections 1.818-2 through 1.818-8, except as otherwise provided therein, are applicable only to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1957, and all references to sections of part I, subchapter L, chapter 1 of the Code are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended by the Life Insurance Company Income Tax Act of 1959 (73 Stat. 112).

[T.D. 6558, 26 FR 2785, Apr. 4, 1961, as amended by T.D. 7469, 42 FR 12181, Mar. 3, 1977]