alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Ehave, Inc. (the “Company”)
hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge that:



| | 1. | The accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2017 (the “Report”)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: May 15, 2019



|/s/ Dianne Parsons             | 
|------------------------------ | 
|Dianne Parsons                 | 
|Acting Chief Financial Officer | 



The foregoing certification
is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for the purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference to any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
427 A.2d 1213

#### Commonwealth v. Kauffman, Appellant.

Submitted June 27, 1978.

Frank J. Mar-cone, for appellant;

Vraim Nedurian, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

*611Before JACOBS, P. J., and HOFFMAN, CERCONE, PRICE, VAN der VOORT, SPAETH and HESTER, JJ.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

CERCONE, P. J., concurred in the result.

JACOBS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
#### Juan L. STEWARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The COLONIAL WILLIAMSBURG FOUNDATION, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 02-1350.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 13, 2002.

Decided June 18, 2002.

Juan L. Steward, Appellant Pro Se. Alexander Neal Barkus, Hunton & Williams, Washington, D.C.; Jeffrey Brian Hardie, Hunton *&*Williams, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Juan L. Steward appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action alleging employment discrimination. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Steward v. Colonial Williamsburg Found.,*No. CA-01-79-4 (E.D.Va. Mar. 20, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
QUALIFICATION STATEMENT FOLLOWING SIGNATURE ON NOTE.

Circuit Court of Cuyahoga County.

#### H. H. Wylie v. The Kingsley Paper Company.

Decided, November 5, 1902.

*Bills and Notes*— Promise *of Agent, a Personal Obligation.*

Where one signs a promissory note and after his signature adds the statement that he is signing it for another, he nevertheless becomes personally liable upon it.

*O. J. Campbell,*for plaintiff in error.

*Carpenter, Young <& Stocker,*contra.

Marvin, J.; Caldwell, J,, and Hale, J., concur.

The Kingsley Paper Company sued II. H. Wylie before a justice of the peace, upon two promissory notes. One of said notes reads as follows:

> “$50.00. November 26, 1898.

> “Two months after date I promise to pay to The German-American Ptg. Co. or order fifty dollars, value received, at their office.

> “IT. H. Wylie,

> *for the Critic Pub. and Prtg. Co.*

> “No.-. Due Jan. 26.”

> The other note reads as follows:

> “$50.00. November 18, 1898.

> “Sixty days after date I, we or either of us promise to pay to the order of The German-American Prtg. Company fifty dollars at their office. Value received.

> “H. TI. Wylie,

> *for the Critic Pub. & Prtg. Co.*

> “No.-. Due Jan. 17.”

The only defense made to these notes was that upon their face they show that Wylie was not the maker of the notes and could not be held personally liable thereon; that each Of the notes was *144a note of the Critic Publishing & Printing Company. The court held otherwise, and judgment was given the plaintiff. This judgment was affirmed by the court of common pleas. It is sought here to reverse the judgment. We hold that the judgment was right, and must be affirmed.

The cases holding that commercial paper signed by one as agent, and as agent of particular persons, is the personal obligation of him who signed the paper are decidedly in point.

It is urged that it can not be claimed that the words following the signature of Wylie on these notes are simply a description of the person; but we think that the notes in this case are clearly written promises on the part of Wylie .for the payment of the money. It is true he says that he promises to pay for this publishing and printing company, but it is clearly *he*who promises to pay. Suppose these notes read “I, H. H. Wylie, promise to pay for the Critic Publishing and Printing Company.” Could there be any doubt that it would be the promise of Wylie, which he is bound to make good? We think not. And we think the language used in the notes sued upon is equally clear that Wylie promised to pay for the company.
Analysis Performed & Reported 

in 2008 Leco Inter-Mountain (Relative Percent Difference)

Air Volume Leco TOF ICP-MS TOF ICP-MS Lab Leco TOF/IML 2008 Data/IML

(m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) RPD RPD

1660 0.45 Not Run 0.29 N/A 42%

1590 4.23 4.58 4.92 -7% -15%

1650 1.61 1.21 1.47 -20% 9%

1850 4.41 4.00 3.42 16% 25%

1840 6.02 5.01 5.14 -3% 16%

1870 4.85 4.49 5.29 -16% -9%

1940 4.52 3.93 4.04 -3% 11%

1970 1.15 0.96 0.43 76% 91%

1920 1.98 1.46 1.17 22% 52%

1940 2.27 2.02 2.13 -5% 6%

1990 1.15 0.89 1.08 -18% 7%

1900 1.78 1.43 1.73 -19% 3%

1890 3.09 2.67 3.03 -13% 2%

1810 1.24 0.90 1.03 -14% 18%

1820 2.35 2.42 2.47 -2% -5%

1960 1.12 0.83 1.14 -31% -2%

1970 1.68 1.23 1.49 -19% 12%

1980 1.95 1.40 1.70 -19% 14%

2000 3.46 3.51 3.68 -5% -6%

2.60 2.39 2.52 -5% -3%

 Analysis Performed & Reported in August, 2010 Data Comparison 

Average (ug/m3)
THE SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 40590 

September3, 2014 

The Honorabl.e 1. Lynn Lewis 

~ayor of Delhi . 

. P.O. Box277 

'I;>elhi~ LA 71232 

Dear Mayor Lewis: 

··. ·r .- . . _ ; 

··). 

~~,; ,_) 

Tb~l;; you. for your letter supporting the application ~ubmitted by Mo11roe Regional Airport for a 

grant under .the U.S. Depart111ent of Transportation's Small. Cmumunity Air Sel*Vice. 

Development Program. 

The ~frilall Community Air Service Developme11tProgrrun was established to help.smallet 

conuuU,nities ~dgress air service deficiencies, particularly issues related to high airfares and 

insufficient seryice. Under the statute, the Dep~rtment may make a maximum of 40 grant 

awards each year~ although no more than four may be to communities in the same State. To 

provide communities with latitude in developing solutions to their air service deficiencies; the 

statute provides flexibility in the types of air service development projects that can be funded. 

On June 30, the Department i~sued an order setting a deadline of July 31 for applications. Joj.s 

these grru1t requests are pending before the Department, I cat1not comment on the merits of any 

particular Proposal. I assure you, howeyer, that the Department will give full and fair 

consideration to all proposals that have been properly filed. 

As is our stat1dard practice, I an1 placing a copy of your letter and this response in Docket 

DOT-OST -20 14-011 3 as a contact outside therecotd of this matter. I appreciate yotirintetest in 

this program. 

f)~ 

\.~ 

Anthony R. Foxx 
2!)9BROADWAY • P.O. BOX277 • DELHI, LOUISIANA •n:m 

TEL (.318) 878-3792 • FAX (318).878-3362 

July29, 2014 

The HonorableAnthony R Foxx 

Secretary 

US DeparbnentofTra:nsportation 

Washington DC 

Subject: Mrmroe R.ugi01wl Airpfm 's crpplicmionjbrjitmlillg mulcr tile Small Cmmmmity Air Sen•i<:cr 

Drtw!lopmmf Progmm for](} /4, 

Dear Secretary Foxx: 

I am writing to express my strong support for the applications submitted by 

the Monroe Regional Airport in Louisiana, for funding under the Small Community 

Air Service Development Program (SCASDP). The Monroe Regional Airport has 

submitted this application to help secure low-cost, non-stop jet service to one or 

more .major destinations for Northeastern Louisiana, Southern Arkansas, and 

Western Mississippi. 

The Town of Delhi acknowledges that the Mon~·oe regional Airport is an 

important local and regional community economic engine in Louisiana. Federal 

funding under The Small Community Air Service Development Program wiH go a 

lortg way in helping expand jet service to more destinations in the United States 

from the Monroe Regional Airport such as a new route fi"Om Monroe to Denver. 

Ortce again, I support the Monroe regional airports application under the 

s111all community air service development progra111. 1 respectfully request your full 

and fair consideration for this proposal. Thank you. 

THIS INSTITUTION lS AN EQUAl. OPPORTUNITY PROV!DER AND EMPLOYER
§ 157.6694-3 Penalty for understatement due to willful, reckless, or intentional conduct. ( a ) *In general.* A person who is a tax return preparer of any return or claim for refund of tax under section 5891 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) shall be subject to penalties under section 6694(b) of the Code in the manner stated in § 1.6694-3 of this chapter.
( b ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section is applicable to returns and claims for refund filed, and advice provided, after December 31, 2008.
[T.D. 9436, 73 FR 78462, Dec. 22, 2008]
# Jornal Oficial C 301A/12 d

| | ISSN 1725-2482 |
| --- | --- |
| Jornal Oficial
  da União Europeia | C 301A |
| | |
| Edição em língua portuguesa | Comunicações e Informações | 49.o ano12 de Dezembro de 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2482

Jornal Oficial

da União Europeia

C 301A

Edição em língua portuguesa

Comunicações e Informações

49.o ano12 de Dezembro de 2006

---

| Número de informação | Índice | Página |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Informações |
| | Comissão |
| 2006/C 301A/1 | Instituto Comunitário das Variedades Vegetais — Convite à manifestação de interesse na nomeação como presidente da instância de recurso ou como seu suplente | 1 |

Número de informação

Índice

Página

III   Informações

Comissão

2006/C 301A/1

Instituto Comunitário das Variedades Vegetais — Convite à manifestação de interesse na nomeação como presidente da instância de recurso ou como seu suplente

1

| PT | |
| --- | --- |

PT

---

III Informações

Comissão

| 12.12.2006 | PT | Jornal Oficial da União Europeia | CA 301/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2006

PT

Jornal Oficial da União Europeia

CA 301/1

---

INSTITUTO COMUNITÁRIO DAS VARIEDADES VEGETAIS

Convite à manifestação de interesse na nomeação como presidente da instância de recurso ou como seu suplente

(2006/C 301 A/01)

O Instituto Comunitário das Variedades Vegetais pretende nomear o presidente da sua instância de recurso e o seu suplente.

Os candidatos devem ser nacionais de um dos Estados-Membros da União Europeia.

O presidente e seu suplente serão nomeados pelo Conselho a partir de uma lista de candidatos, que serão propostos pela Comissão após parecer do Conselho de Administração do Instituto. Para informações quanto à remuneração oferecida, devem os interessados dirigir-se ao Secretariado da Instância de Recurso (Instituto Comunitário das Variedades Vegetais, 3, boulevard Marechal-Foch, BP 10121, F-49101 Angers Cedex 02). O Instituto Comunitário das Variedades Vegetais e a Comissão aplicam uma política de igualdade de oportunidades.

A descrição de funções, os formulários de candidatura e as instruções para a apresentação de candidaturas podem ser obtidos na internet nos seguintes endereços:

http://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/propertyrights/index_en.htm

ou

http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm

O prazo de recepção das candidaturas termina em 31 de Janeiro de 2007 (para mais informações, ver instruções de candidatura).

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.7701-12 Employer identification number.

For purposes of this chapter, the term *employer identification number* means the taxpayer identifying number of an individual or other person (whether or not an employer) which is assigned pursuant to section 6011 (b) or corresponding provisions of prior law, or pursuant to section 6109, and in which nine digits are separated by a hyphen, as follows: 00-0000000. The terms “employer identification number” and “identification number” (defined in § 31.0-2(a)(11) of this chapter (Employment Tax Regulations)) refer to the same number.

[T.D. 7306, 39 FR 9947, Mar. 15, 1974]
**EXHIBIT 31.1**








RULE 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002







I, J. Randolph Potter, certify that:


1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Summit Financial Corporation;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and


5.****The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.









Date: May 5, 2004J. Randolph Potter, President and Chief Executive Officer
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 17, 2023

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00749-CR

NO. 14-22-00750-CR

HIPOLITO TORRES GALICIA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 268th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 19-DCR-089024 & 19-DCR-089025

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The State charged appellant with two counts of indecency with a child and 

one count of aggravated sexual assault of a child. After appellant was convicted of 

aggravated sexual assault of a child, the State moved to dismiss the two charges for 

indecency. The trial court granted the motion and dismissed the charges for 

indecency with a child. Appellant, however, filed a notice of appeal in each of the 
2

three cause numbers, despite there only being a final judgment in one of the 

causes. 

In Texas, appeals in criminal cases are permitted only when they are 

authorized by statute. State ex rel. Lykos, 330 S.W.3d 904, 915 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2011); see Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 44.02. Generally, a criminal defendant may 

only appeal from a final judgment of conviction. See State v. Sellers, 790 S.W.2d 

316, 321 n. 4 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990). The courts of appeals do not have 

jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders in a criminal appeal absent express 

statutory authority. Apolinar v. State, 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex. Crim. App.

1991). See also Ragston v. State, 424 S.W.3d 49 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

There is not a judgment of conviction in trial court cause number 19-DCR089024, appellate cause number 14-22-00749-CR; nor in trial court cause number 

19-DCR-089025, appellate cause number 14-22-00750-CR. Accordingly, we have 

no jurisdiction over these appeals. 

We dismiss the appeals. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Bourliot and Hassan.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
3

20

0

10

30

20

20

20

10

20

20

20

20

20

20

30

20

20

10

20

20

20

20

10

20

40

10

20

20

20

10

30

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

30

20

20

20

20

20

20

30

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

10

20

20

30

10

20

20

20

20

20

20 20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

30

20

20

30

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

10

20

20

20

20

30

20

20

30

20

20

10

20

20

10

20

20

10

30

20

20

30

20

10

10

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

10

20

20

20

30

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

30

20

20

20

10

20

20

20

20

10

20

20

20

20

30

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

10

20

20

20

20 20

30

20

20

20

20

Cayo Soledad

Salvador

Windmill

Mike

Windmill

Chicago

Windmill

Borrego

Windmill

Saltillo

Well

Rosita

Lake Rudolph

Los Amigos

Windmill

San

Pedro

Ranch

Norias

Rosita

Lake NE

Maria

Estella

Well

Armstrong

FEET

FEET

1 230 000 FEET

97°37'30"

30"

37'

30" 40'

40' 97°

97°

26°

45' 26°

45'

45'

45'

26°

97° 30"

52' 52'30"

42'

47'30" 47'30"

30"

42'

50'

26°

50'

16 840 000

1 260 000 FEET

16 800 000

E

6 000m 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

6 000m

29

29

29

29

6

29

29

6

29

29

29

6

29

6

29

6

29

29

29

000m

29

29

29

29

6

29

6

29

000m

6

6 6

29

29

6

6

29

29

29

25 E 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33

27 31

67

66

32

68

26

60

36

61

63

62

69

34

60

73

69

61

30

65

73

70

63

70

65

N

33

66

71

71

28

35

36

62

67

72

N

68

29 35

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

TEXAS

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

TX 2697-342

SALTILLO WELL, TX

2010

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Interstate Route US Route State Route

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

SALTILLO WELL QUADRANGLE

TEXAS

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Zone 14R

Imagery......................................................NAIP, April 2008

Roads.....................................US Census Bureau TIGER data

with limited USGS updates, 2008

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2008

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 1995

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2009

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator,

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Texas Coordinate System of 1983

(south zone)

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is also draft version 0.5.10

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0 1

MILES

MN

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

GN

UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 35 ́

11 MILS

4° 46 ́

85 MILS

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

14R

PQ

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

I. VELLA-LOPEZ, 4A Law Library

Officer at CSP-Corcoran; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 11-17176

D.C. No. 1:11-cv-00990-AWISKO

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Anthony W. Ishii, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 9, 2012 ** 

Before: RAWLINSON, MURGUIA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Raymond Alford Bradford, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from

the district court’s judgment denying him leave to proceed in forma pauperis in his

42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations in connection with his

FILED

OCT 16 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-17176

medical treatment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de

novo the district court’s interpretation and application of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g),

Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1052 (9th Cir. 2007), and for an abuse of

discretion its denial of leave to proceed in forma pauperis, O’Loughlin v. Doe, 920

F.2d 614, 616 (9th Cir. 1990). We reverse and remand.

The district court improperly denied Bradford’s request to proceed in forma

pauperis because Bradford made plausible allegations that he was “under imminent

danger of serious physical injury” at the time he lodged the complaint, including

that defendants continued to deny him adequate treatment for his blood clotting

disorder. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); see also Andrews, 493 F.3d at 1055 (an exception

to the three-strikes rule exists “if the complaint makes a plausible allegation that

the prisoner faced ‘imminent danger of serious physical injury’ at the time of

filing”).

REVERSED and REMANDED.