alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made to thatcertain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2015, by andamong WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as General Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS,LLC, as General Special Servicer, NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BANK, N.A., as NCBMaster Servicer, NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BANK, N.A., as NCB Special Servicer,MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as OneCourt Square Special Servicer, PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Trust Advisor,WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, as TaxAdministrator and as Custodian and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asTrustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-NXS3(the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwisedefined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the General Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 throughDecember 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performanceper the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the General Master Servicer, has fulfilled allof its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

 

/s/Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President 

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       4,869,987
<SECURITIES>                                 6,913,139
<RECEIVABLES>                                  226,357
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,944,267
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,215,049
<PP&E>                                       8,021,034
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,563,286
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,228,277
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          554,700
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    82,935,482
<OTHER-SE>                                (63,367,591)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,228,277
<SALES>                                        236,460
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               439,076
<CGS>                                          127,543
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,487,683
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,048,607)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,048,607)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,048,607)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6999

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SETH MICHAEL FERRANTI, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CR-91-337-A, CA-97-1075-AM) Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: October 26, 1998 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Seth Michael Ferranti, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Fay Wright, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Seth Michael Ferranti seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Ferranti , Nos. CR-91-337-A; CA-97-1075-AM (E.D. Va. Apr. 22, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>


                                                                     EXHIBIT 32
                                                                     ----------

                  FAIRFIELD INN BY MARRIOTT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                             FORM 10-Q JUNE 30, 2003
                             ------------------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fairfield Inn by Marriott
Limited Partnership, (the "Partnership"), on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date
indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Partnership.


Date:  August 13, 2003                      /s/ Michael L. Ashner
                                            ---------------------
                                                Michael L. Ashner
                                                Chief Executive Officer

Date:  August 13, 2003                      /s/ Thomas C. Staples
                                            ---------------------
                                                Thomas C. Staples
                                                Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1375

In re: HARRY CHARITY, III,

 Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. 

(1:06-cr-00175-CMH-1; 1:13-cv-00736-CMH)

Submitted: October 26, 2016 Decided: November 7, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harry Charity, III, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Harry Charity, III, petitions for a writ of mandamus, 

alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this 

court directing the district court to act. Our review of the 

district court’s docket reveals that the district court ruled on 

the § 2255 motion, denying it and declining to grant a 

certificate of appealability. Accordingly, because the district 

court has recently decided Charity’s case, we deny the mandamus 

petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
AMENDMENT 5 TO KINDRED 401K PLAN




 EXHIBIT 10.13 
 AMENDMENT NO. 5 
 TO THE 
 KINDRED 401(k) PLAN 
 This is Amendment No. 5 to the Kindred 401(k) Plan
(the “Plan”) as last amended and restated as of January 1, 2003, which amendment shall be effective as of December 27, 2006. 
 RECITALS 
  

	A.	Kindred Healthcare, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Plan and has reserved the right in Section 9.1 of the Plan to amend the Plan from time to time in its
discretion. 

  

	B.	The Company desires to amend the Plan in order to provide for participation in the Plan by employers who are managed by the Company pursuant to a management agreement or partnership
that has been accepted as a Participating Employer. 

 AMENDMENTS 
 1. Appendix B to the Plan is hereby amended to add the following at the end thereof: 
 As of March 1, 2006. 
 Partnerships 
  

					
	 Name of Partnership
	 	 Partners
	 	 Total Direct or Indirect Kindred Ownership

	 KPS Denver, LLC
 #8410
	 	 KPS Mountain, Inc. – 51%
 ARC Pharmacy Services, LLC – 49%
	 	 51%


 As of May 1, 2006. 
 Partnerships 
  

					
	 Name of Partnership
	 	 Partners
	 	 Total Direct or Indirect Kindred Ownership

	 KPS Dallas Limited Partnership
 #8413
	 	 Kindred Institutional Pharmacy Services – 50%
 KPS Dallas Holdings, LLC – 1%
 ARC Pharmacy Services, LLC – 49%
	 	 51%

			
	 KPS Phoenix, LLC
 #8412
	 	 Kindred Institutional Pharmacy Services – 51%
 ARC Pharmacy Services, LLC – 49%
	 	 51%










 As of July 1, 2006. 
 Partnerships 
  

					
	 Name of Partnership
	 	 Partners
	 	 Total Direct
or
Indirect
Kindred
Ownership

	 KPS Houston Limited Partnership
 #8421
	 	 Kindred Institutional Pharmacy Services– 50%
 KPS Houston Holdings, LLC– 1%
 ARC Pharmacy Services, LLC– 49%
	 	 51%

			
	 KPS San Antonio Limited Partnership
 #8419
	 	 Kindred Institutional Pharmacy Services– 50%
 KPS San Antonio Holdings, LLC– 1%
 ARC Pharmacy Services, LLC– 49%
	 	 51%


 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Employer has
caused this Amendment No. 5 to be executed this 27th day of December 2006. 
  

			
	KINDRED HEALTHCARE, INC.
		
	By	 	 /s/ Richard E. Chapman

		
	Title:	 	 Executive Vice President and
 Chief Administrative
and
 Information Officer



  

 2
H. Con. Res. 41 Agreed to March 16, 1995

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the fourth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-five

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That when the House adjourns on Thursday, March 16,

1995, it stand adjourned until 12:30 p.m. on Tuesday, March 21,

1995.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
# C_2014175EN.01002101.xml

| 10.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/21

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Oradea (Romania) lodged on 7 March 2014 — Horațiu Ovidiu Costea v SC Volksbank România SA

(Case C-110/14)

2014/C 175/25

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Judecătoria Oradea

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Horațiu Ovidiu Costea

Applicant:

Defendant: SC Volksbank România SA

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Must Article 2(b) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (1) be interpreted as including in, or as excluding from, the definition of ‘consumer’ a natural person who practises as a lawyer and concludes a credit agreement with a bank, in which the purpose of the credit concerned is not specified, when in that agreement that natural person’s law firm is stated to be the guarantor for the mortgage?

1

---

(1)  OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29.

1

---
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

	I, Theron G. Reed, certify that: 

l.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Community National Bancorporation;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

	(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

	(b)	[Intentionally omitted]

	(c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

	(d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

	(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

	(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 13, 2003.

/S/ Theron G. Reed
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 152 (Monday, August 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 39991]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19013]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice of Reporting Requirements Submitted for OMB Review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35), agencies are required to submit proposed reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements to OMB for review and approval, and to 
publish a notice in the Federal Register notifying the public that the 
agency has made such a submission.

DATES: Submit comments on or before September 9, 2009. If you intend to 
comment but cannot prepare comments promptly, please advise the OMB 
Reviewer and the Agency Clearance Officer before the deadline.
    Copies: Request for clearance (OMB 83-1), supporting statement, and 
other documents submitted to OMB for review may be obtained from the 
Agency Clearance Officer.

ADDRESSES: Address all comments concerning this notice to: Agency 
Clearance Officer, Jacqueline White, Small Business Administration, 409 
3rd Street, SW., 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20416; and OMB Reviewer, 
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and 
Budget, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacqueline White, Agency Clearance 
Officer, (202) 205-7044.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: Application for Small Business Size Determination.
    SBA Form Number: 355.
    Frequency: On Occasion.
    Description of Respondents: Small Businesses.
    Responses: 600.
    Annual Burden Hours: 2,400.

Jacqueline White,
Chief, Administrative Information Branch.
[FR Doc. E9-19013 Filed 8-7-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of CEN Biotech, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I, Richard Boswell, Chief Financial Officer, do hereby certify, to my knowledge:

 

(1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

| Date: April 17, 2018 |                    |
|----------------------|-------------------------|
|                 |                    |   |
| By:                  | */s/**Richard Boswell*  |   |
|                 | Richard Boswell         |   |
|                 | Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to CEN Biotech, Inc. and will be retained by CEN Biotech, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4491 — DHC/KP1)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/C 293/06)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

(2)OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

EDELLA JOHNSON (A/K/A EDELLA 

ROBINSON A/K/A EDELLA ROBINSON 

JOHNSON) , ERIC JOHNSON, 

INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF 

OTHER SIMILARLY SITUATED FORMER 

AND CURRENT HOMEOWNERS IN 

PENNSYLVANIA,

Petitioners

v.

PHELAN HALLINAN & SCHMIEG, LLP,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 11 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of May, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

GRANTED, LIMITED to the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining 

issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity is: 

Did the Superior Court err in determining the mortgage at issue was not a 

“residential mortgage” and that petitioners are therefore not entitled to seek 

damages pursuant to 41 P.S. §§406 and 502?
#### § 20.6302-1 Voluntary payments of estate taxes by electronic funds transfer.

Any person may voluntarily remit by electronic funds transfer any payment of tax to which this part 20 applies. Such payment must be made in accordance with procedures prescribed by the Commissioner.

[T.D. 8828, 64 FR 37676, July 13, 1999]
#### § 1.6050I-0 Table of contents.

This section lists the major captions that appear in §§ 1.6050I-1 and 1.6050I-2.

## § 1.6050I-1 Returns relating to cash in excess of $10,000 received in a trade or business.

(a) Reporting requirement.

(1) Reportable transaction.

(i) In general.

(ii) Certain financial transactions.

(2) Cash received for the account of another.

(3) Cash received by agents.

(i) General rule.

(ii) Exception.

(iii) Example.

(b) Multiple payments.

(1) Initial payment in excess of $10,000.

(2) Initial payment of $10,000 or less.

(3) Subsequent payments.

(4) Example.

(c) Meaning of terms.

(1) Cash.

(i) Amounts received prior to February 3, 1992.

(ii) Amounts received on or after February 3, 1992.

(iii) Designated reporting transaction.

(iv) Exception for certain loans.

(v) Exception for certain installment sales.

(vi) Exception for certain down payment plans.

(vii) Examples.

(2) Consumer durable.

(3) Collectible.

(4) Travel or entertainment activity.

(5) Retail sale.

(6) Trade or business.

(7) Transaction.

(8) Recipient.

(d) Exceptions to the reporting requirements of section 6050I.

(1) Receipt of cash by certain financial institutions.

(2) Receipt of cash by certain casinos having gross annual gaming revenue in excess of $1,000,000.

(i) In general.

(ii) Casinos exempt under 31 CFR 1010.970(c).

(iii) Reporting of cash received in a nongaming business.

(iv) Example.

(3) Receipt of cash not in the course of the recipient's trade or business.

(4) Receipt is made with respect to a foreign cash transaction.

(i) In general.

(ii) Example.

(e) Time, manner, and form of reporting.

(1) Time of reporting.

(2) Form of reporting.

(3) Manner of reporting.

(i) Where to file.

(ii) Verification.

(iii) Retention of returns.

(f) Requirement of furnishing statements.

(1) In general.

(2) Form of statement.

(3) When statement is to be furnished.

(g) Cross-reference to penalty provisions.

(1) Failure to file correct information return.

(2) Failure to furnish correct statement.

(3) Criminal penalties.

## § 1.6050I-2 Returns relating to cash in excess of $10,000 received as bail by court clerks.

(a) Reporting requirement.

(b) Meaning of terms.

(c) Time, form, and manner of reporting.

(1) Time of reporting.

(i) In general.

(ii) Multiple payments.

(2) Form of reporting.

(3) Manner of reporting.

(i) Where to file.

(ii) Verification of identity.

(d) Requirement to furnish statements.

(1) Information to Federal prosecutors.

(i) In general.

(ii) Form of statement.

(2) Information to payors of bail.

(i) In general.

(ii) Form of statement.

(iii) Aggregate amount.

(e) Cross-reference to penalty provisions.

(f) Effective date.

[T.D. 8652, 61 FR 7, Jan. 2, 1996, as amended by T.D. 8974, 66 FR 67687, Dec. 31, 2001; T.D. 9972, 88 FR 11764, Feb. 23, 2023]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Be th Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 28, 2015

p0720 

# Order

Clerk July 28, 2015

150363

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 150363

COA: 322023

Emmet CC: 11

- 003521

- FH

REGGIE BERNARD BURKS

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 19, 2014

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIE D, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).