alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**MAC R1204-0109062 Old Annapolis RoadColumbia, MD 21045Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for COMM 2015-LC23 Mortgage Trust Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates

 

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

February 29, 2016

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

/s/ Jeffrey Coletta

Jeffrey Coletta

Assistant Secretary

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 21, 2016

t0914

Order 

Clerk

September 21, 2016

153367

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 153367

COA: 315774 

Wayne CC: 12-001086-FC

ANTON T. BLEVINS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 11, 2016 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the 

cases of People v Steanhouse (Docket No. 152849) and People v Masroor (Docket Nos. 

152946-8) are pending on appeal before this Court and that the decisions in those cases 

may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that 

the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decisions in those cases.
#### § 1.863-0A Table of contents.

This section lists captions contained in §§ 1.863-3A and 1.863-3AT.

## § 1.863-3A Income from the sale of personal property derived partly from within and partly from without the United States.

(a) General.

(1) Classes of income.

(2) Definition.

(b) Income partly from sources within a foreign country.

(1) General.

(2) Allocation or apportionment.

(c) Income partly from sources within a possession of the United States.

(1) General.

(2) Allocation or apportionment.

(3) Personal property produced and sold.

(4) Personal property purchased and sold.

## § 1.863-3AT Income from the sale of personal property derived partly from within and partly from without the United States (temporary).

(a) [Reserved].

(b) Income partly from sources within a foreign country.

(1) [Reserved].

(2) Allocation or apportionment.

(c)(1) through (4) [Reserved].

[T.D. 9921, 85 FR 79845, Dec. 11, 2020]
39704.

#### KRAMER v. STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

The State Highway Department brought a condemnation proceeding against the condemnee’s property. On appeal to the jury, Judge Knight having disqualified himself, the case was heard by Judge Foster. Thereafter, the condemnee’s motion for new trial was overruled and she now excepts to such adverse judgment. *Held:*

1. At least one-half of the seventy-eight pages of testimony contained in the purported brief of evidence includes either motions to rule out evidence, objections to evidence, rulings of the court on various objections and motions, colloquies between counsel and between counsel and the court, and various other irrelevant matter. “This court will not undertake to separate material evidence from extraneous matter where counsel have not undertaken to do so, and will not pass upon assignments of error requiring a consideration of the evidence where the evidence is not in proper form for consideration. *Brown v.*Clarke, 211 Ga. 61 (84 SE2d 14); *Williamson v.*Yakupian, 211 Ga. 61 (84 SE2d 15); *Boston Ins. Co. v. Harmon,*66 Ga. App. 383 (1) (18 SE2d 84).” *Satterwhite v. Mansfield,*91 Ga. App. 450 (85 SE2d 802). Accordingly, neither the usual general grounds of the motion for new trial nor the special grounds, with the exception of the last such special ground, will be considered as each of such grounds requires a consideration of the evidence.

2. The last special ground complains that the jury was drawn by a disqualified judge. Judge Knight, Judge of Carroll Superior Court, who had represented the condemnor prior to his election and had disqualified himself, had drawn the jury panels. No objection appears to have been made before the trial of the case, and there is no contention that the plaintiff in error or her counsel did not know of the alleged defect in the drawing of the jury panel. “When parties are furnished with a list of the jury it is their duty, if they know that any of the jurors are disqualified, to call attention to the same, or the disqualification will be held to have been waived.” *Moore v. Farmers Mut. Ins. Assn.,*107 Ga. 199, 209 (33 SE 65). See also *Jennings v. Autry,*94 Ga. App. 344 (94 SE2d 629). Therefore, assuming, but not deciding, that the contention of the condemnee (that a judge disqualified from hearing the case is also disqualified from drawing the jury panel), is cor*707rect, yet where no objection is made until after an adverse verdict and no showing is made that the losing party or her counsel did not know of such purported disqualification until after verdict such alleged disqualification is waived.

Decided September 20, 1962

Rehearing denied October 3, 1962.

*Shirley C. Boykin, William P. Johnson,*for plaintiff in error.

*Eugene Cook, Attorney General, Carter Goode, Assistant Attorney General, Herbert M. Crane, Jr., William J. Wiggins,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Frankum and Jordan, JJ., concur.*
Employment Letter Agreement between NewPage Corp. and Charles J. Aardema



 EXHIBIT 10.30 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 TO 
 EMPLOYMENT LETTER AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment No. 1 is made effective as of January 28, 2007, and modifies and amends the Employment Letter Agreement dated May 2, 2005 (“Agreement”) between NewPage Corporation
(“Company”) and Charles J. Aardema (“Executive”). Terms defined in the Agreement have the same meaning when used in this Amendment unless otherwise indicated. For good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged, Company and Executive agree as follows: 
  

	1.	Section 2(c) of the Agreement is amended in its entirety to read as follows: 

 “(c) Annual Bonus. For performance periods during the Term, Executive will be entitled to participate in the NewPage Corporation management incentive or bonus plan or plans approved annually by the Board
of Directors of the Company (the “Annual Incentive Plan”). Executive’s target bonus will be 37% of Base Salary for achieving targets set annually pursuant to the terms the Annual Incentive Plan. Each annual bonus (“Annual
Bonus”) will be paid on or before March 15th of the year following the tax year in which the relevant services required for payment have been performed. There will be no cap on the amount of any Annual Bonus.” 
  

	2.	Except as modified by this Amendment, the Agreement remains in full force and effect. 

  


					
	Company:	 	Executive:
	NewPage Corporation	 	
			
	By:	 	 /s/ Mark A. Suwyn
	 	 /s/ Charles J. Aardema

		 		 	Charles J. Aardema
	Title:	 	Chairman and CEO
# Euroopa Liidu C 301A/12.

| | ISSN 1725-5171 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopa Liidu
  Teataja | C 301A |
| | |
| Eestikeelne väljaanne | Teave ja teatised | 49. köide12. detsember 2006 |

ISSN 1725-5171

Euroopa Liidu

Teataja

C 301A

Eestikeelne väljaanne

Teave ja teatised

49. köide12. detsember 2006

---

| Teatis nr | Sisukord | Lehekülg |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Teatised |
| | Komisjon |
| 2006/C 301A/1 | Osalemiskutse Ühenduse Sordiameti apellatsiooninõukogu esimehe ja aseesimehe konkursile | 1 |

Teatis nr

Sisukord

Lehekülg

III   Teatised

Komisjon

2006/C 301A/1

Osalemiskutse Ühenduse Sordiameti apellatsiooninõukogu esimehe ja aseesimehe konkursile

1

| ET | |
| --- | --- |

ET

---

III Teatised

Komisjon

| 12.12.2006 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | CA 301/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2006

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

CA 301/1

---

OSALEMISKUTSE ÜHENDUSE SORDIAMETI

apellatsiooninõukogu esimehe ja aseesimehe konkursile

(2006/C 301 A/01)

Ühenduse Sordiamet soovib nimetada ametisse oma apellatsiooninõukogu esimehe ja aseesimehe.

Kandideerija peab olema Euroopa Liidu liikmesriigi kodanik.

Nõukogu nimetab ametisse esimehe ja aseesimehe kandidaatide nimekirjast, mille komisjon esitab pärast ameti haldusnõukogu arvamuse saamist. Teavet töötasu kohta võib saada apellatsiooninõukogu sekretariaadilt (Ühenduse Sordiamet, 3, Boulevard Maréchal-Foch, BP 10121, F-49101 Angers Cedex 02). Ühenduse Sordiamet ja komisjon järgivad võrdsete võimaluste poliitikat.

Töö kirjeldus, avalduste vormid ja avalduste saatmise juhised on allalaadimiseks saadaval järgmistel veebilehtedel:

http://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/propertyrights/index_en.htm

või

http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm.

Avalduste esitamise tähtaeg on 31. jaanuar 2007 (vt üksikasju avalduste saatmise juhistest).

---
§ 157.6694-4 Extension of period of collection when preparer pays 15 percent of a penalty for understatement of taxpayer's liability and certain other procedural matters. ( a ) *In general.* For rules relating to the extension of period of collection when a tax return preparer who prepared a return or claim for refund for tax under section 5891 of the Internal Revenue Code pays 15 percent of a penalty for understatement of taxpayer's liability and procedural matters relating to the investigation, assessment and collection of the penalties under section 6694(a) and (b), the rules under § 1.6694-4 of this chapter will apply.
( b ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section is applicable to returns and claims for refund filed, and advice provided, after December 31, 2008.
[T.D. 9436, 73 FR 78462, Dec. 22, 2008]
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 148 (Tuesday, August 4, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 38630]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18557]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Office of the Secretary


Office for Civil Rights; Delegation of Authority

    Notice is hereby given, that I have delegated to the Director of 
the Office for Civil Rights (OCR), with authority to redelegate, the 
following authority vested in the Secretary of Health and Human 
Services:
    1. The authority under section 262 of the Health Insurance 
Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), Public Law 104-191, 
as amended, to the extent that these actions pertain to the ``Security 
Standards for the Protection of Electronic Protected Health 
Information,'' at 45 CFR part 160 and part 164, subparts A and C, to
    A. Impose civil money penalties under section 1176 of the Social 
Security Act for a covered entity's failure to comply with certain 
requirements and standards;
    B. Issue subpoenas requiring the attendance and testimony of 
witnesses and the production of any evidence that relates to any matter 
under investigation or compliance review for failure to comply with 
certain requirements and standards; and
    C. Make exception determinations, under section 1178(a)(2)(A) of 
the Social Security Act, concerning when provisions of State laws that 
are contrary to the Federal standards are not preempted by the Federal 
provisions.
    2. The authority under section 262 of HIPAA, as amended, to 
administer the regulation ``Security Standards for the Protection of 
Electronic Protected Health Information,'' at 45 CFR part 160 and part 
164, subparts A and C, and General Administrative Requirements, 45 CFR 
Part 160, as these requirements pertain to part 164, subparts A and C, 
and to make decisions regarding the interpretation and enforcement of 
these Standards and General Administrative Requirements.
    This delegation shall be exercised under the Department's existing 
delegation of authority and policy relating to regulations.
    This delegation supersedes the memorandum from the Secretary to the 
Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, dated October 
7, 2003, titled ``Delegation of Authority for Certain Provisions Under 
Part C of Title XI of the Social Security Act.''
    I hereby affirm and ratify any actions taken by the Director of OCR 
or his/her subordinates which involved the exercise of the authority 
delegated herein prior to the effective date of this delegation.
    This delegation is effective immediately.

    Dated: July 27, 2009.
Kathleen Sebelius,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-18557 Filed 8-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4153-01-P
#### § 1.815-5 Other accounts defined.

The term *other accounts,* as used in section 815(a)(3) and paragraph (b) of § 1.815-2, means all amounts which are not specifically included in the shareholders surplus account under section 815(b) and paragraph (b) of § 1.815-3, or in the policyholders surplus account under section 815(c) and paragraph (b) of § 1.815-4. Thus, for example, other accounts includes amounts representing the increase in tax due to the operation of section 802(b)(3) which is not taken into account for the taxable years 1959 and 1960 because of the special transitional rule provided in section 802(a)(3), earnings and profits accumulated prior to January 1, 1958, paid-in surplus, capital, etc. To the extent that a distribution (or any portion thereof) is treated as being made out of other accounts, no tax is imposed on the company with respect to such distribution.

[T.D. 6535, 26 FR 544, Jan. 20, 1961, as amended by T.D. 9849, 84 FR 9236, Mar. 14, 2019]
##### 



Exhibit 11
 (1)
 2005
    
    2004A
    
    Net income as reported, Canadian GAAP ($ millions)
    
    $
    295.5
    
    
    $
    123.3B
    
    Items adjusting net income ($ millions)
    
    $
    3.5
    
    
    $
    4.8C
    
    Net income, US GAAP ($ millions)
    
    $
    299.0
    
    
    $
    128.1D
    
    Weighted average number of shares outstanding
    
    
    110,365,000
    
    
    
    106,866,000E
    
    Net additional shares issuable for diluted earnings per share calculation
    
    
    3,041,000
    
    
    
    1,364,000CANADIAN GAAPBasic earnings per share (A/D)
    
    $
    2.68
    
    
    $
    1.15Diluted earnings per share (A/(D+E))
    
    $
    2.61
    
    
    $
    1.14UNITED STATES GAAPBasic earnings per share (C/D)
    
    $
    2.71
    
    
    $
    1.20Diluted earnings per share (C/(D+E))
    
    $
    2.64
    
    
    $
    1.18
 
 (1)
#### § 1.822-7 Amortization of premium and accrual of discount.

Section 822(d)(2) makes provision for the appropriate amortization of premium and the appropriate accrual of discount, attributable to the taxable year, on bonds, notes, debentures, or other evidences of indebtedness held by a mutual insurance company subject to the tax imposed by section 821. Such amortization and accrual is the same as that provided for life insurance companies by section 818(b)(1), as amended by the Life Insurance Company Income Tax Act of 1959 (73 Stat. 133), and shall be determined in accordance with paragraphs (a) and (b) of § 1.818-3, except in the case of a mutual insurance company subject to the tax imposed by section 821, paragraph (b) of § 1.818-3 shall apply without regard to the date of acquisition and the basis provided in section 1012 shall be used in lieu of the acquisition value.

[T.D. 6610, 27 FR 8722, Aug. 31, 1962]
# G 

# U 

# L 

# F 

# O 

# F 

# M 

# E 

# X 

# I 

# C 

# O P

A

C

I

F

I

C

O

C

E

A

N A T L A N T I C

O C E A N 

## L a k e S

u p

e r i o r

L a k e M i c h i g a n 

### L a k

e H

u r o n

L a k e E

r i e O n t a r i o

L a k e



### G U

L F O

F A

L A S K A 

### P 

### A 

### C



### I 

### F



## I 

## C 

## O 

## C 

## E 

## A 

## N B E R I N G 

### S



### E 

### A 

### A R C T I C O C E A N

R U S S I

A

C A

N A D A 

### P A C

I F I C O C E A N 

# M E X

I C O 

# C 

# A 

# N 

# A 

# D 

# A

C U B A T



## H



## E 

## B 

## A



## H



## A



## M



## A



## S MAINE

VERMONT NEW HAMPSHIRE



## NEW Y ORK MA SS

A CHUSE TTS

CONNECTICU T RH ODE ISLAND



## PENNS YL

V

ANIA

NEW JER SEY

DELA W

ARE

MAR

YLAND



## VIR GINIA WES T

VIR GINIA 

# OHIO



# INDIANA 

# ILLINOIS 

# WISCONSIN

KENTUCKY



# TENNESSEE NOR TH CAR OLINA

SO U TH

CAR OLINA



# GEOR GIA 

# ALAB AMA

FLORID A MISSISSIPPI



# LO UISIANA TEXA S 

# ARKANS A S MISSO URI IO W A 

# MINNESO T A NOR TH D AK O T A



# SO U TH D AK O T A

NEBRA SKA



# KANS A S

OKLAH OMA

NEW MEXICO 

# COLORAD O W Y OMING MONT ANA

ID

AH O



## U T

AH

ARIZONA NEV AD A

CALIFORNIA OREGON 

## W

A

SHINGT ON

DC 

### M

I C

H

I G

A

N



# HA W AII

ALA SKA



# T he National Atlas of the United States of America U.S. Department of the Interior

U.S. Geological Survey 

# Wher e W e Ar e 

# national atlas .go v TM



# O **R**

**states(bright)2.pdf IN TERIOR-GEOL**  **OGICAL SUR VE**  **Y , RES**  **T ON,**  **VIRGINIA-20 03**  P A C I F I C O C E A N A T L A N T I C

O C E A N

H A W A I I A

L A S K A



### 200 mi 0

200 km 0 100 mi 0

100 km 0

300 mi 0

300 km 200 0 100 100 200 

# ST A TES

in bright colors
§ 876.5960 Computerized behavioral therapy device for treating symptoms of gastrointestinal conditions. ( a ) *Identification.* A computerized behavioral therapy device for treating symptoms of gastrointestinal conditions is a prescription device intended to provide a computerized version of condition-specific therapy as an adjunct to standard of care treatments to patients with gastrointestinal conditions.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are: ( 1 ) Clinical data must be provided to fulfill the following: ( i ) Describe a model of therapy for the indicated gastrointestinal conditions;
( ii ) Validate the model of therapy as implemented by the device using a clinically defined endpoint; and
( iii ) Evaluate all adverse events.
( 2 ) Software must be described in detail in the software requirements specification and software design specification. Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis must be performed. Software documentation must demonstrate that the device effectively implements the behavioral therapy model.
( 3 ) Usability assessment must demonstrate that the intended user(s) can safely and correctly use the device.
( 4 ) Labeling: ( i ) Labeling must include instructions for use, including images that demonstrate how to interact with the device;
( ii ) Patient and physician labeling must list the minimum operating system requirements that support the software of the device;
( iii ) Patient and physician labeling must include a warning that the device is not intended for use in lieu of a standard therapeutic intervention or to represent a substitution for the patient's medication;
( iv ) Patient and physician labeling must include a warning to seek medical care if a patient has feelings or thoughts of harming themselves or others; and
( v ) Physician and patient labeling must include a summary of the clinical testing with the device.
[88 FR 3636, Jan. 20, 2023]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Statement of Financial Condition at December 31, 1997 (unaudited) and the
Statement of Income for the three months ended December 31, 1997 (unaudited) and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        28,547
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               600
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       29,147
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                28,547
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             7793
<OTHER-SE>                                           (7,193)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         29,147
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (28,547)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (28,547)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
## In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 18

- 00092

- CV

CORKER CUSTOM HOMES, LLC, CORKER DEVELOPMENT, LLC, AND ARTHUR

CORKER, III, Appellants

V.

ELIZABETH DANNER AND AARON DANNER, Appellees

On Appeal from the 425th Judicial District Court

Williamson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16

- 0539

- C425

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Burgess2 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION

The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal, representing that they have

fully and finally resolved any pending issues related to the judgment from which this appeal was

filed. Under the authority of Rule 42.1(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure and in

keeping with the parties’ wishes, we grant the motion to dismiss. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(a).

We dismiss this appeal.

Ralph K. Burgess

Justice

Date Submitted: November 19, 2018

Date Decided: November 20, 2018