Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 186 / Tuesday, September 25, 2012 / Notices 58989 

denied the August 4, 2011, Petition 

(Petition), submitted under title V of the 

Clean Air Act (Act) by WildEarth 

Guardians (Petitioner), to object to 

WDEQ’s June 7, 2011 Permit (Permit) 

issued to Cheyenne Light, Fuel & Power 

(CLF&P) for their Wygen II power plant 

(Wygen II). 

Pursuant to sections 307(b) and 

505(b)(2) of the Act, a petition for 

judicial review of those portions of the 

Order that deny issues in the Petition 

may be filed in the United States Court 

of Appeals for the appropriate circuit 

within 60 days from the date this notice 

appears in the Federal Register. 

ADDRESSES: You may review copies of 

the final Order, the Petition, and other 

supporting information at the EPA 

Region 8 Office, 1595 Wynkoop Street, 

Denver, Colorado, 80202–1129. EPA 

requests that if at all possible, you 

contact the individual listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

view the copies of the final Order, the 

Petition, and other supporting 

information. You may view the hard 

copies Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 

4 p.m., excluding Federal holidays. If 

you wish to examine these documents, 

you should make an appointment at 

least 24 hours in advance. Additionally, 

the final Order for CLF&P Wygen II is 

available electronically at: http://www.

epa.gov/region07/air/title5/petitiondb/

petitions/wygen2_response2011.pdf. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Donald Law, Air Program (8P–AR), EPA 

Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, 

Colorado, 80202–1129. Phone: (303) 

312–7015. Email: law.donald@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Act 

affords EPA a 45-day period to review 

and object to, as appropriate, a title V 

operating permit proposed by State 

permitting authorities. Section 505(b)(2) 

of the Act authorizes any person to 

petition the EPA Administrator, within 

60 days after the expiration of this 

review period, to object to a title V 

operating permit if EPA has not done so. 

Petitions must be based only on 

objections to the permit that were raised 

with reasonable specificity during the 

public comment period provided by the 

State, unless the petitioner demonstrates 

that it was impracticable to raise these 

issues during the comment period or the 

grounds for the issues arose after this 

period. EPA received a petition from 

WildEarth Petitioner dated August 4, 

2011, requesting that EPA object to the 

issuance of the Permit to CLF&P for the 

Wygen II power plant located in 

Campbell County, Wyoming. The 

Petition alleges that WDEQ failed to 

respond to comments on the draft 

permit. 

On August 23, 2012, the 

Administrator issued an Order denying 

the Petition. The Order explains the 

reasons behind EPA’s conclusions. 

Dated: September 11, 2012. 

James B. Martin, 

Regional Administrator, Region 8. 

[FR Doc. 2012–23590 Filed 9–24–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[FRL–9720–7] 

Proposed CERCLA Administrative 

Cost Recovery Settlement for the 

Buckbee-Mears Co. Superfund Site in 

Cortland, NY, Cortland County 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice; request for public 

comment. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 

122 (h) of the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation, and Liability Act of 

1980, as amended (‘‘CERCLA’’), notice 

is hereby given of a proposed 

administrative settlement for recovery of 

past response costs concerning the 

Buckbee-Mears Co. Superfund Site 

located in Cortland, Cortland County, 

New York, (the ‘‘Site’’) with the State 

Bank of India, New York Branch (the 

‘‘Bank’’). Pursuant to the settlement EPA 

will receive: (1) All funds in an escrow 

account with accrued interest 

(approximately $116,500); (2) Twentyfive percent of any funds the Bank 

collects from the principals of 

International Electron Devices (USA), 

LLC, the current owner and past 

operator of the Site at the time of 

disposal; and (3) A share of the proceeds 

from the sale of two parcels of land 

within the Site (‘‘Properties’’) following 

the Bank’s foreclosure sale and 

distribution of certain amounts to the 

City of Cortland (‘‘City’’) and Cortland 

County (‘‘County’’) in settlement of their 

respective tax liens. The sales proceeds 

shall be distributed as follows: (a) The 

Bank will pay to the City the greater of 

$302,881 or 15% after the Bank is paid 

$150,000 attributable to the costs of 

marketing and selling the Properties; (b) 

The Bank will pay to the County $2,120; 

and (c) Any proceeds from the 

foreclosure sale remaining after the 

above payments will be distributed in 

proportion to the following lien 

amounts: (1) For EPA, $8,323.204; (2) 

for the Bank, $8,434,911; (3) for the City, 

$1,199,043 minus the greater of 

$302,881 or fifteen percent (15%) of the 

proceeds from the sale of the Properties. 

The settlement also includes a covenant 

not to sue the settling party pursuant to 

Sections 106 and 107(a) of CERCLA, for 

Existing Contamination, as defined in 

the settlement, at the Site. For thirty (30) 

days following the date of publication of 

this notice, the Agency will receive 

written comments relating to the 

settlement. The Agency will consider all 

comments received and may modify or 

withdraw its consent to the settlement 

if comments received disclose facts or 

considerations which indicate that the 

settlement is inappropriate, improper, 

or inadequate. 

DATES: Comments must be provided 

within thirty days of the publication of 

this notice. 

ADDRESSES: Comments should be 

addressed to the U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, Office of Regional 

Counsel, 290 Broadway, 17th Floor, 

New York, New York 10007–1866 and 

should refer to the Buckbee-Mears Co. 

Superfund Site located in Cortland, 

New York, Cortland County, EPA 

Region II Docket No. CERCLA–02– 

2012–2017. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Office of Regional Counsel, 290 

Broadway, 17th Floor, New York, New 

York 10007–1866, Attention: Marla E. 

Wieder, Assistant Regional Counsel at 

(212) 637–3184. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A copy of 

the proposed settlement may be 

obtained from Marla Wieder, Assistant 

Regional Counsel at the address above, 

or via email at wieder.marla@epa.gov. 

Dated: July 20, 2012. 

John LaPadula, 

Deputy Director, Emergency & Remedial 

Response Division. 

[FR Doc. 2012–23587 Filed 9–24–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

EXPORT–IMPORT BANK 

[Public Notice 2012–0505] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Final Collection; Comment 

Request 

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the U.S. 

ACTION: Submission for OMB Review 

and Comments Request. 

Form Title: EIB 11–05 Exporter’s 

Certificate for Loan Guarantee & MT 

Insurance Programs 

SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank of 

the United States (Ex-Im Bank), as a part 

of its continuing effort to reduce 

paperwork and respondent burden, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
58990 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 186 / Tuesday, September 25, 2012 / Notices 

invites the general public and other 

Federal Agencies to comment on the 

proposed information collection, as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act of 1995. 

Ex-Im Bank’s borrowers, financial 

institution policy holders and 

guaranteed lenders provide this form to 

U.S. exporters, who certify to the 

eligibility of their exports for Ex-Im 

Bank support. For direct loans and loan 

guarantees, the completed form is 

required to be submitted at time of 

disbursement and held by either the 

guaranteed lender or Ex-Im Bank. For 

MT insurance, the completed forms are 

held by the financial institution, only to 

be submitted to Ex-Im Bank in the event 

of a claim filing. Ex-Im Bank believes 

that EIB 11–05 requires emergency 

approval in order to continue operation 

of its long- and medium-term financing 

programs. It is an integral component of 

the programs and is heavily used. 

Lack of an emergency approval of this 

form would preclude our ability to 

continue operation of its long- and 

medium-term financial institution 

programs. Ex-Im Bank developed the 

referenced form to obtain exporter 

certifications regarding the export 

transaction, content sourcing, and their 

eligibility to participate in USG 

programs. These details are necessary to 

determine the value and legitimacy of 

Ex-Im Bank financing support and 

claims submitted. It also provides the 

financial institutions a check on the 

export transaction’s eligibility at the 

time it is fulfilling a financing request. 

Accordingly, Ex-Im Bank requests 

emergency approval of EIB 11–05 in 

order to continue operation of these 

important export programs. 

The form can be viewed at: www.

exim.gov/pub/pending/eib11-05.pdf. 

DATES: Comments should be received on 

or before October 25, 2012 to be assured 

of consideration. 

ADDRESSES: Comments may be 

submitted electronically on WWW.

REGULATIONS.GOV or by mail to 

Office of Information and Regulatory 

Affairs, 725 17th Street NW., 

Washington, DC 20038 Attn: OMB 

3048–XXXX. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Titles and Form Number EIB 11–05 

Exporter’s Certificate for Direct Loan, 

Loan Guarantee & MT Insurance 

Programs 

OMB Number: 3048–0043. 

Type of Review: New. 

Need and Use: The information 

collected will provide information 

needed to determine compliance and 

content for transaction requests 

submitted to the Export-Import Bank 

under its insurance, guarantee, and 

direct loan programs. 

Affected Public: This form affects 

entities involved in the export of U.S. 

goods and services. 

Annual Number of Respondents: 

4,000. 

Estimated Time per Respondent: 30 

minutes. 

Total Burden: 2,000 hours. 

Government Reviews only forms 

when a claim is filed—in FY 2011 54 

claims were filed utilizing this form. 

Government Annual Burden Hours: 

54. 

Frequency of Reporting or Use: As 

needed. 

Total Cost to the Government: 

$2,090.88. 

Sharon A. Whitt, 

Agency Clearance Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2012–23561 Filed 9–24–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6690–01–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

Information Collection Being Reviewed 

by the Federal Communications 

Commission 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications 

Commission (FCC), as part of its 

continuing effort to reduce paperwork 

burdens, invites the general public and 

other Federal agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on the 

following information collection, as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act (PRA) of 1995. Comments are 

requested concerning whether the 

proposed collection of information is 

necessary for the proper performance of 

the functions of the Commission, 

including whether the information shall 

have practical utility; the accuracy of 

the Commission’s burden estimate; 

ways to enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information collected; 

ways to minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on the 

respondents, including the use of 

automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology; 

and ways to further reduce the 

information collection burden on small 

business concerns with fewer than 25 

employees. 

The FCC may not conduct or sponsor 

a collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid control 

number. No person shall be subject to 

any penalty for failing to comply with 

a collection of information subject to the 

PRA that does not display a valid Office 

of Management and Budget (OMB) 

control number. 

DATES: Written PRA comments should 

be submitted on or before November 26, 

2012. If you anticipate that you will be 

submitting comments, but find it 

difficult to do so within the period of 

time allowed by this notice, you should 

advise the contact listed below as soon 

as possible. 

ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to 

the Federal Communications 

Commission via email to PRA@fcc.gov 

and Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

additional information about the 

information collection, contact Cathy 

Williams at (202) 418–2918. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

OMB Control Number: 3060–0692. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Title: Sections 76.802 and 76.804, 

Home Wiring Provisions; Section 

76.613, Interference from a Multichannel Video Programming Distributor 

(MVPD). 

Form Number: N/A. 

Respondents: Individuals or 

households; Business or other for-profit 

entities. 

Number of Respondents: 22,000. 

Estimated Time per Response: 0.083— 

2 hours. 

Frequency of Response: On occasion 

reporting requirement; Recordkeeping 

requirement; Annual reporting 

requirement; Third party disclosure 

requirement. 

Obligation to Respond: Required to 

obtain or retain benefits. The statutory 

authority for this collection is contained 

in Sections 1, 4, 224, 251, 303, 601, 623, 

624 and 632 of the Communications Act 

of 1934, as amended. 

Total Annual Burden: 36,114 hours. 

Total Annual Cost: None. 

Privacy Act Impact Assessment: No 

impact(s). 

Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: 

There is no need for confidentiality with 

this collection of information. 

Needs and Uses: In the Cable 

Television Consumer Protection and 

Competition Act of 1992, Congress 

directed the FCC to adopt rules 

governing the disposition of home 

wiring owned by a cable operator when 

a subscriber terminates service. The 

rules at 76.800 et seq., implement that 

directive. The intention of the rules is 

to clarify the status and provide for the 

disposition of existing cable operatorowned wiring in single family homes 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES