alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Encorium Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Philip L. Calamia, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Philip L. Calamia                                         
|Philip L. Calamia                                             
|Interim Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)

May 15, 2008

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or
as a separate disclosure document.



E-4
#### State of Indiana, ex rel. Stockton *v.*Lane, Trustee, et al.

[No. 22,625.

Filed May 13, 1914.

Rehearing denied October 8, 1914.]

1. *Appeal.*— Assignment *of Errors.*— Parties.—Dismissal.—An assignment of errors on appeal must be against the party in whose favor the judgment appealed from was rendered; hence where the judgment was for defendant in his official capacity, nothing was presented by an assignment of errors naming defendant a party in his individual capacity, and, on appellant’s failure to amend, a dismissal of the appeal was required, p. 250.

From White Circuit Court; *James P. Wason,*Judge.

Action by the State of Indiana, on the relation of Jay W. Stockton, against Edward P. Lane, as trustee of Newton School Township in Jasper County and others. From a judgment for defendants, the relator appeals. (Trans*250ferred from the Appellate Court under §1399 Burns 1914, Acts 1901 p. 565.)

*Appeal dismissed.*

*John A. Dunlap,*for appellant.

*George A. Williams,*for appellees.

Morris, C. J.

This was an action for damages on the bond of a township trustee. The complaint was filed by appellant, against appellee Edward P. Lane as trustee of the school township of Newton, county of Jasper, and the sureties on the official bond. Lane, as trustee, filed a demurrer to the complaint, which the court sustained, and appellant declining to plead further, judgment was rendered in favor of the trustee. Prom such judgment this appeal is prosecuted.

1.

The judgment was rendered on December 29, 1911, and the brief of appellant was filed here on April 17, 1912, while appellees’ brief was filed May 16, 1912. In the latter brief, appellee Lane, as trustee, calls our attention to appellant’s assignment of errors, which shows that it is against Edward P. Lane, and the sureties sued, and that no error is assigned against Lane in his official capacity. The brief contains a motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellant never asked leave to amend the assignment of errors. In *Braden*v. *Leibenguth*(1891), 126 Ind. 336, 25 N. E. 899, this court said: “The assignment of error, like a complaint, must be against the proper party. One person can not be sued in the court below, and on appeal assign error against another. The assignment of error must be against the person in whose favor the alleged erroneous ruling was made.” .There was no judgment below in favor of Edward P. Lane. It was for Lane in his official capacity. Had appellant, after appellees’ motion to dismiss was filed, and before the expiration of the year allowed for appeals from final judgments, filed a proper motion for leave to amend the assignment of errors, it would, no doubt have been granted. No such petition was presented, and no reply brief was filed, *251and the appeal must be dismissed for failure to assign any error against the party that recovered judgment. Appeal dismissed.

Note. — Reported in 105 N. E. 147. See, also, 2 Cyc. 985.
Editorial Note on Part 890
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 890 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 890.5380 Powered exercise equipment. ( a ) *Identification.* Powered exercise equipment consist of powered devices intended for medical purposes, such as to redevelop muscles or restore motion to joints or for use as an adjunct treatment for obesity. Examples include a powered treadmill, a powered bicycle, and powered parallel bars.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 890.9.
[48 FR 53047, Nov. 23, 1983, as amended at 61 FR 1125, Jan. 16, 1996; 66 FR 38818, July 25, 2001]
#### Donald J. PANDO, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. David RYAN, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 01-56549.

D.C. No. CV-01-00635-IEG.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 10, 2002.*

Decided June 13, 2002.

Before O’SCANNLAIN, BERZON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 We unanimously find this case suitable for decision without oral argument and deny Pando’s request for oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Donald J. Pando appeals pro se the district court’s order dismissing his action against California Superior Court Judge David Ryan. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Moore v. Brewster,*96 F.3d 1240, 1243 (9th Cir.1996), and we affirm.

Pando’s complaint alleged that Judge Ryan ruled against him and issued a restraining order as part of a conspiracy and a vendetta against Pando for filing lawsuits against the district attorney and other judges. The district court properly dismissed this action because Judge Ryan is protected by absolute judicial immunity. *See Id.*at 1244 (noting that “even a conspiracy between a judge and [a party] to predetermine the outcome of a judicial proceeding, while clearly improper, nevertheless does not pierce the immunity extended to judges.”).

All pending motions are denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage Servicing**D1086-120, 12th Floor550 South Tryon StreetCharlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 **ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**  Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2015, by and among J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Torchlight Loan Services, LLC, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-C33 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. Pursuant to Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that: 1. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from November 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.  /s/ Daniel BoberDaniel BoberExecutive Vice PresidentWells Fargo Bank   

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.   | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|-------------------------------|------------------------------------|
Amendment No.2 dated March 22, 1990



 EXHIBIT (10) (c) 
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 
 TO 
 THE FIRST AMERICAN FINANCIAL CORPORATION 
 EXECUTIVE SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFIT PLAN

 This Amendment No. 2 to The First American Financial Corporation Executive Supplemental Benefit Plan (hereinafter referred to as
the “Plan”) is effective as of January 2, 1990 and modifies such Plan as set forth below: 
 Section 3 (d) of the
Plan is amended to read in full as follows: 
 “(d) Deferred Retirement 
 A participant who retires after his Normal Retirement Date shall be entitled to a Retirement Income Benefit in the form of a Joint
Survivor Annuity equal to the greater of: 
 (i) the Retirement Income Benefit he would have received had he retired on his
Normal Retirement Date (without regard to compensation received or service performed after his Normal Retirement Date), increased for each Year of Credited Service, or fraction thereof, between his Normal Retirement Date and actual retirement date
(not to exceed 5 such years) at the rate of 5% per annum, compounded annually, or 
 (ii) the Retirement Income Benefit
he would have received had he retired on his Normal Retirement Date, except that such benefit shall be computed based on Final Average Compensation received through his 70th birthday.” 
 Executed at Santa Ana, California, this 22nd of March, 1990. 
  

			
	THE FIRST AMERICAN FINANCIAL CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	/s/ D.P. Kennedy
	Its:	 	President
		
	By:	 	/s/ William Zaenglein
	Its:	 	Secretary & Counsel
39938 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 152 / Monday, August 10, 2009 / Notices 

[FR Doc. E9–18958 Filed 8–7–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal Nos. 09–36] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601– 

3740. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittals 09–36 

with attached transmittal, policy 

justification, and Sensitivity of 

Technology. 

Dated: July 28, 2009. 

Patricia L. Toppings, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, 

Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 


rmajette on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICESEN10AU09.003</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 152 / Monday, August 10, 2009 / Notices 39939 


rmajette on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICESEN10AU09.004</GPH>
39940 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 152 / Monday, August 10, 2009 / Notices 

[FR Doc. E9–18960 Filed 8–7–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal Nos. 09–27] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 


rmajette on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICESEN10AU09.005</GPH>
#### § 1.678(d)-1 Renunciation of power.

Section 678(a) does not apply to a power which has been renounced or disclaimed within a reasonable time after the holder of the power first became aware of its existence.
Exhibit 11
 POTASH CORPORATION OF SASKATCHEWAN INC.
COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30
 2008
    
    
    2007A Net income as reported, Canadian GAAP ($ millions)
    
    
    2,707.2
    
    
    
    726.8B Items adjusting net income ($ millions)
    
    
    (51.3
    )
    
    
    10.5C Net income, US GAAP ($ millions)
    
    
    2,655.9
    
    
    
    737.3D Weighted average number of shares outstanding
    
    
    310,076,000
    
    
    
    315,444,000E Net additional shares issuable for diluted earnings per share calculation (Canadian GAAP)
    
    
    10,408,000
    
    
    
    8,136,000F Net additional shares issuable for diluted earnings per share calculation (US GAAP)
    
    
    10,404,000
    
    
    
    8,119,000CANADIAN GAAPBasic earnings per share (A/D)
    
    
    8.73
    
    
    
    2.30Diluted earnings per share (A/(D+E))
    
    
    8.45
    
    
    
    2.25UNITED STATES GAAPBasic earnings per share (C/D)
    
    
    8.57
    
    
    
    2.34Diluted earnings per share (C/(D+F))
    
    
    8.29
    
    
    
    2.28
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**MAC R1204-0109062 Old Annapolis RoadColumbia, MD 21045Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc.

375 PARK AVE FL 2

Wells Fargo Securities, LLC

NEW YORK, New York 10152-0002

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-SG1, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-SG1

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

February 25, 2016

 

 

/s/ BRIAN SMITH

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Encorium Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kai Lindevall, M.D. Ph. D., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Kai Lindevall, M.D. Ph. D.Kai Lindevall, M.D. Ph. D.Executive Chairman(Principal Executive Officer)





May 3, 2011





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
§ 1.996-8 Effect of carryback of capital loss or net operating loss to prior DISC taxable year. ( a ) Under § 1.995-2(e), the deduction under section 172 for a net operating loss carryback or under section 1212 for a capital loss carryback is determined as if the DISC were a domestic corporation which had not elected to be treated as a DISC. A carryback of a net operating loss or of a capital loss of any corporation which reduces its taxable income for a preceding taxable year for which it qualified as a DISC will have the consequences enumerated in paragraphs (b) through (e) of this section.
( b ) For such preceding taxable year, the amount of a deemed distribution of one-half of certain taxable income described in § 1.995-2(a)(4) will ordinarily be reduced in effect (but not below zero) by one-half of the sum of the amount of the deduction under section 172 for such year for net operating loss carrybacks and the amount of the deduction under section 1212 for such year for capital loss carrybacks.
( c ) The amount of reduction in the deemed distribution under paragraph (b) of this section will have the effect of increasing the limitation, provided in § 1.995-2(b)(2), on the amount of foreign investment attributable to producer's loans which is deemed distributed under § 1.995-2(a)(5).
( d ) If the amount of a deemed distribution for a preceding taxable year is reduced as described in paragraph (b) of this section, then for such preceding taxable year the previously taxed income (as defined in § 1.996-3(c)) shall be decreased by the amount of such reduction and the accumulated DISC income (as defined in § 1.996-3(b)) shall be increased by the amount of such reduction. Such adjustments shall be made as of the time the deemed distribution for such preceding taxable year is treated as having occurred. See § 1.996-1(d) for the priority of such deemed distribution in relation to other distributions made in that preceding taxable year.
( e ) The amount and treatment of any actual distribution made in such preceding taxable year or a year subsequent to such preceding year, and the treatment of gain on a disposition (in any such year) of the DISC's stock to which § 1.995-4 applies, shall be properly adjusted to reflect the adjustments to previously taxed income and accumulated DISC income described in paragraph (d) of this section.
[T.D. 7324, 39 FR 35125, Sept. 30, 1974]
EX-31 Rule13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Anthony Sfarra,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed inrespect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the Wells FargoCommercial Mortgage Trust 2015-C31 (the "Exchange Act periodicreports");

 

2. Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on myknowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required tobe provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is includedin the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on myknowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under theservicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesand their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in thisreport in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to

this report, exceptas otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties:

 

Midland LoanServices, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer,Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, TriMont Real EstateAdvisors, LLC, as Trust Advisor, CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services,Inc., as Servicing Function Participant, National Tax Search, LLC, as ServicingFunction Participant, Prudential Asset Resources, Inc., as Primary Servicer,Prudential Asset Resources, Inc., as Primary Servicer for the Patrick HenryMall Mortgage Loan, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer for thePatrick Henry Mall Mortgage Loan, Wilmington Trust, National Association, asTrustee for the Patrick Henry Mall Mortgage Loan, TriMont Real Estate Advisors,Inc., as Trust Advisor for the Patrick Henry Mall Mortgage Loan, KeyBankNational Association, as Primary Servicer for the 11 Madison Avenue MortgageLoan, KeyBank National Association, as Special Servicer for the 11 MadisonAvenue Mortgage Loan, and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trusteefor the 11 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan.

 

 

 

Dated: March 21, 2018

 

 

/s/ Anthony Sfarra

 

 

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
Exhibit 10.11


GENERAL MARITIME CORPORATION


Amendment No. 1 to General
Maritime Corporation’s 2001 Stock Incentive Plan


(as
amended and restated, effective March 30, 2006)


Section 2.7(e) of the
2001 Stock Incentive Plan of General Maritime Corporation (the “Company”), as
amended and restated (effective March 30, 2006), is hereby amended by adding
the underscored sentence to the end thereof as set forth below:


(e)           Minimum Vesting Periods.  To the extent that vesting of restricted
stock is based on the grantee’s continued employment (or other service) with
the Company for a specified period, the shares of restricted stock shall not
vest in full until the third anniversary of the grant date, provided, however,
that in each calendar year the Committee may grant up to 76,597 restricted
shares (subject to adjustment as provided in Section 3.7(a)) with shorter
vesting periods to (i) non-employee directors in lieu of director fees, and
(ii) new employees or consultants in connection with their commencing
employment or other service.  For the avoidance of doubt, this Section
2.7(e) shall not preclude the accelerated vesting of restricted stock in the
case of termination of employment, death, disability, Change in Control, or
similar special circumstances.


December 18, 2006
§ 26.6696-1 Claims for credit or refund by tax return preparers. ( a ) *In general.* For rules for claims for credit or refund by a tax return preparer who prepared a return or claim for refund for generation-skipping transfer tax under chapter 13 of subtitle B of the Internal Revenue Code, or by an appraiser that prepared an appraisal in connection with such a return or claim for refund under section 6695A, the rules under § 1.6696-1 of this chapter will apply.
( b ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section is applicable to returns and claims for refund filed, and advice provided, after December 31, 2008.
[T.D. 9436, 73 FR 78453, Dec. 22, 2008]