alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 05, 2021. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, May 05, 2021 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A21D0302. INLAND FRESH SEAFOOD CORPORATION OF AMERICA, INC. v. TOP QUALITY RECRUITMENT, INC.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 2017CV295535
# PHANTOM 3 In the Box ADVANCED Check that all of the following items are in your package. If any items are missing, please contact DJI or your local dealer.

©2015 DJI. All Rights Reserved. Intelligent Flight Battery ×1 Gimbal Clamp ×1 Aircraft Body ×1 Remote Controller ×1 Propeller Pairs ×4
16GB Micro-SD Card ×1 Manuals Vibration Absorbers ×4

Power Cable ×1 Anti-drop Kit ×2 Micro-USB Cable ×1 Landing Pads ×4 Propeller Wrench ×1 Stickers ×4 (Silver, red, blue, pink) * Accessories are not covered by warranty. In the Box Phantom 3 Professional / Advanced Safety Guidelines and Disclaimer Phantom 3 Professional / Advanced Intelligent Flight Battery Safety Guidelines Phantom 3 Advanced Quick Start Guide **Accessories*** **Essentials** Battery Charger ×1
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 191

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 31, 1996

Received and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To recognize and honor the Filipino World War II veterans

for their defense of democratic ideals and their important

contribution to the outcome of World War II.

Whereas the Commonwealth of the Philippines was strategically located and thus vital to the defense of the United

States during World War II;

Whereas the military forces of the Commonwealth of the

Philippines were called into the United States Armed

Forces during World War II by Executive order and were

put under the command of General Douglas MacArthur;
2

HCON 191 RFS

Whereas the participation of the military forces of the Commonwealth of the Philippines in the battles of Bataan

and Corregidor and in other smaller skirmishes delayed

and disrupted the initial Japanese effort to conquer the

Western Pacific;

Whereas that delay and disruption allowed the United States

the vital time to prepare the forces which were needed to

drive the Japanese from the Western Pacific and to defeat Japan;

Whereas after the recovery of the Philippine Islands from

Japan, the United States was able to use the strategically

located Commonwealth of the Philippines as a base from

which to launch the final efforts to defeat Japan;

Whereas every American deserves to know the important contribution that the military forces of the Commonwealth of

the Philippines made to the outcome of World War II;

and

Whereas the Filipino World War II veterans deserve recognition and honor for their important contribution to the

outcome of World War II: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress recognizes and honors the

3 Filipino World War II veterans for their defense of demo4 cratic ideals and their important contribution to the out5 come of World War II.

Passed the House of Representatives July 29, 1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
EX-31 Rule13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Anthony Sfarra,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed inrespect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the Wells FargoCommercial Mortgage Trust 2015-C31 (the "Exchange Act periodicreports");

 

2. Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on myknowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required tobe provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is includedin the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on myknowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under theservicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesand their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in thisreport in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except asotherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties:

 

Midland LoanServices, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer,Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, TriMont Real EstateAdvisors, LLC, as Trust Advisor, CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services,Inc., as Servicing Function Participant, National Tax Search, LLC, as ServicingFunction Participant, Prudential Asset Resources, Inc., as Primary Servicer,Prudential Asset Resources, Inc., as Primary Servicer for the Patrick HenryMall Mortgage Loan, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer for thePatrick Henry Mall Mortgage Loan, Wilmington Trust, National Association, asTrustee for the Patrick Henry Mall Mortgage Loan, TriMont Real Estate Advisors,Inc., as Trust Advisor for the Patrick Henry Mall Mortgage Loan, KeyBankNational Association, as Primary Servicer for the 11 Madison Avenue MortgageLoan, KeyBank National Association, as Special Servicer for the 11 MadisonAvenue Mortgage Loan, and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trusteefor the 11 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan.

 

 

 

Dated: March 22, 2019

 

 

/s/ Anthony Sfarra

 

 

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         1950315
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               5920000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    8638159
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                       95591231
<ALLOWANCE>                                    1923690
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               115989833
<DEPOSITS>                                   102525727
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             827685
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       7649291
<OTHER-SE>                                     4987130
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               115989833
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                2423249
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               221471
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               2644720
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             1277864
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1277864
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          1366856
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   165000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 781162
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 585092
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      585292
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    328092
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.09
<LOANS-NON>                                     397432
<LOANS-PAST>                                    351662
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 170166
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               1824179
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    70402
<RECOVERIES>                                      4913
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              1923690
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           1890000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          33690
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.26


Compensation
Arrangements for the Executive Officers


Set forth below is a summary of the compensation by
SEACOR Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) to its executive officers in their
positions as of the date of filing of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Form 10-K”). All of
the Company’s executive officers are at-will employees whose compensation and
employment status may be changed at any time in the discretion of the Company’s
Board of Directors.


Base Salary.   Effective January 1, 2007, the executive
officers are scheduled to receive the following annual base salaries in their
current positions:




	
  Name and Current Position

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Base Salary

  	
   

  
	
  Charles Fabrikant,  Chairman of the Board,
  President, and Chief Executive Officer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  700,000

  	
   

  
	
  Randall Blank,
  Senior Vice President

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  375,000

  	
   

  
	
  James Cowderoy,
  Senior Vice President

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  335,000

  	
   

  
	
  Dick Fagerstal,
  Senior Vice President, Corporate Development and Treasurer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  335,000

  	
   

  
	
  John Gellert,
  Senior Vice President

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  365,000

  	
   

  
	
  Alice Gran,
  Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  335,000

  	
   

  
	
  Richard Ryan,
  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  335,000

  	
   

  
	
  Matthew Cenac,
  Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  240,000

  	
   

  
	
  Andrew Strachan, Vice
  President

  	
   

  	
  £

  	
  140,000

  	
   

  






 


Cash Bonus and Share
Incentive Plan.   In their current
positions, the executive officers are eligible to:


·       Receive
an annual cash incentive award subject to the discretion of the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors.


·       Participate
in incentive programs, which currently involve awards of restricted stock and
stock options pursuant to the Company’s 2003 Share Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10.18
to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2006).


Benefit
Plans and Other Arrangements.   In
their current positions, the executive officers are eligible to  participate in the Company’s broad-based benefit programs
generally available to its salaried employees, including health, disability and
life insurance programs, and a qualified 401(k) plan.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 22, 2020

Order 

Clerk

July 22, 2020

153828(85)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 153828

v COA: 324018 

Wayne CC: 14-000152-FC

THEODORE PAUL WAFER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

By order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellant to extend the time 

for filing his supplemental brief is GRANTED. The brief will be accepted as timely filed 

if submitted on or before August 17, 2020.
----

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/C 303/26)

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/

----

(1)  NPV: Net present value

----
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk August 18, 2010 

# Order

August 18, 2010

139799(56)(58)

JOHN F. SINGER, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, SC: 139799 v COA: 284575 Macomb CC: 06-002281-NI ANURADHA SREENIVASAN and BALAJI GANAPATHY, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ ________________

On order of the Chief Justice, the mo tion by Michigan Defens e Trial Counsel for
leave to file a brief amicus curiae is considered and it is GRANTED. The motion by plaintiff-appellant for extension to August 11, 2010 of the time for filing his brief is
considered and it is GRANTED.
H. Con. Res. 153 Agreed to June 21, 1996

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

Concurrent Resolution

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Greater Washington Soap

Box Derby.

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF SOAP BOX DERBY RACES ON CAPITOL

GROUNDS.

The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby Association (hereinafter in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Association’’) shall be

permitted to sponsor a public event, soap box derby races, on

the Capitol Grounds on July 13, 1996, or on such other date as

the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President

pro tempore of the Senate may jointly designate.

SEC. 2. CONDITIONS.

The event to be carried out under this resolution shall be

free of admission charge to the public and arranged not to interfere

with the needs of Congress, under conditions to be prescribed by

the Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board; except

that the Association shall assume full responsibility for all expenses

and liabilities incident to all activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.

For the purposes of this resolution, the Association is authorized

to erect upon the Capitol Grounds, subject to the approval of the

Architect of the Capitol, such stage, sound amplification devices,

and other related structures and equipment as may be required

for the event to be carried out under this resolution.
H. Con. Res. 153—2

SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board

are authorized to make any such additional arrangements that

may be required to carry out the event under this resolution.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 230

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 30, 1996

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for the sine die adjournment of the second session

of the One Hundred Fourth Congress.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legisla3 tive day of Monday, September 30, 1996, or of Tuesday,

4 October 1, 1996, on a motion offered pursuant to this con5 current resolution by the Majority Leader, or his designee,

6 it stand adjourned sine die, or until noon on the second
2

HCON 230 RDS

1 day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to

2 section 2 of this concurrent resolution, and that when the

3 Senate adjourns on Monday, September 30, 1996, or

4 Tuesday, October 1, 1996, on a motion offered pursuant

5 to this concurrent resolution by the Majority Leader, or

6 his designee, it stand adjourned sine die, or until noon

7 on the second day after Members are notified to reassem8 ble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution.

9 Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority

10 Leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with

11 the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority Lead12 er of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House

13 and Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in their

14 opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Passed the House of Representatives September 28,

1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D2023-2026

LT Case No. 2021-CP-000761

_____________________________

AMBER JADE F. JOHNSON,

Appellant,

v.

AMY R.P. BOMBERGER,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County.

John Galluzzo, Judge.

Robert C. Wilkins, Jr., of Robert C. Wilkins, Jr., P.L., Orlando, 

for Appellant. 

Cynthia G. Crider, Winter Garden, for Appellee.

May 7, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

JAY, KILBANE, and PRATT, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
# C_2016402EN.01003301.xml

| 31.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 402/33

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2016 — PT Wilmar Bioenergi Indonesia and PT Wilmar Nabati Indonesia v Council

(Case T-139/14) (1)

1

((Dumping - Imports of biodiesel originating in Indonesia - Definitive anti-dumping duties - Article 2(3) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 - Normal value - Production costs))

(2016/C 402/36)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: PT Wilmar Bioenergi Indonesia (Medan, Indonesia) and PT Wilmar Nabati Indonesia (Medan) (represented by: P. Vander Schueren, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented initially by S. Boelaert, and subsequently by H. Marcos Fraile, acting as Agents, and by R. Bierwagen and C. Hipp, lawyers)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by J.-F. Brakeland, M. França and A. Stobiecka-Kuik, acting as Agents) and European Biodiesel Board (EBB) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by O. Prost and M.-S. Dibling, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action pursuant to Article 263 TFUE for annulment of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1194/2013 of 19 November 2013 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of biodiesel originating in Argentina and Indonesia (OJ 2013 L 315, p. 2) in so far as the applicants are concerned.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Articles 1 and 2 of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1194/2013 of 19 November 2013 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of biodiesel originating in Argentina and Indonesia, in so far as they concern PT Wilmar Bioenergi Indonesia and PT Wilmar Nabati Indonesia; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Articles 1 and 2 of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1194/2013 of 19 November 2013 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of biodiesel originating in Argentina and Indonesia, in so far as they concern PT Wilmar Bioenergi Indonesia and PT Wilmar Nabati Indonesia;

| 2. | Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by PT Wilmar Bioenergi Indonesia and PT Wilmar Nabati Indonesia; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by PT Wilmar Bioenergi Indonesia and PT Wilmar Nabati Indonesia;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission and the European Biodiesel Board (EBB) to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission and the European Biodiesel Board (EBB) to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 151, 19.5.2014.

1

---
§ 1.9003-2 Effect of election. ( a ) *In general.* If a taxpayer makes the election described in paragraph (b) of § 1.9003-1, he shall be deemed to have consented to the application of section 302(b) of the Act with respect to all taxable years to which the election applies. Thus, subparagraph (F) of section 613(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 as amended must be applied in determining gross income from mining for the taxable years to which the election applies (including years subject to the Internal Revenue Code of 1939) whether or not the taxpayer is litigating the issue. Further, the election shall apply to all calcium carbonates or other minerals mined and used by the taxpayer in making cement.
( b ) *Effect on gross income from mining.* The election is only determinative of what constitutes “mining” for purposes of computing percentage depletion and has no effect on the method employed in determining the amount of gross income from mining. In applying the election to the years affected there shall be taken into account the effect that any adjustments resulting from the election shall have on other items affected thereby, such as charitable contributions, foreign tax credit, net operating loss, and the effect that adjustments to any such items shall have on other taxable years. The provisions of section 302(b) of the Act are applicable with respect to taxable years subject to the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 for purposes of applying sections 450 and 453 of that Code.
[T.D. 6492, 25 FR 8905, Sept. 16, 1960]