alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.13


 


American Dental

Technologies, Inc.


 


555 Bear Lane     Corpus
Christi, TX 78405


Telephone:  (361) 289-1145    Fax: 
(361) 289-5554


 


April 29, 2002


 


Mr. Benjamin Gallant

1 Schendel

Portland, Texas 78374


 


Dear Ben:


 


As you know, it is with regret
that we accept your resignation as an officer and director of American Medical
Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) which was tendered at the board meeting on
April 23, 2002.  This letter will
confirm that the Company will honor the terms of its employment agreement with
you which is effective through July 31, 2003 and will pay you all amounts
required thereunder.  The Company will
also carry you under its health insurance through July 31, 2003.


 


If the foregoing correctly sets
forth our agreement, please sign below.


 


With best personal regards,


 


	
  /s/    John
  Vicker, III

  	
   

  
	
   

  
	
  John Vickers
  III, Chairman and CEO

  



 


 


Agreed and accepted:


 


	
  /s/   Benjamin Gallant

  	
   

  
	
   

  
	
  Benjamin
  Gallant
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.7701-6 Definitions; person, fiduciary. ( a ) *Person.* The term *person* includes an individual, a corporation, a partnership, a trust or estate, a joint-stock company, an association, or a syndicate, group, pool, joint venture, or other unincorporated organization or group. The term also includes a guardian, committee, trustee, executor, administrator, trustee in bankruptcy, receiver, assignee for the benefit of creditors, conservator, or any person acting in a fiduciary capacity.
( b ) *Fiduciary* — ( 1 ) *In general.* Fiduciary is a term that applies to persons who occupy positions of peculiar confidence toward others, such as trustees, executors, and administrators. A fiduciary is a person who holds in trust an estate to which another has a beneficial interest, or receives and controls income of another, as in the case of receivers. A committee or guardian of the property of an incompetent person is a fiduciary.
( 2 ) *Fiduciary distinguished from agent.* There may be a fiduciary relationship between an agent and a principal, but the word agent does not denote a fiduciary. An agent having entire charge of property, with authority to effect and execute leases with tenants entirely on his own responsibility and without consulting his principal, merely turning over the net profits from the property periodically to his principal by virtue of authority conferred upon him by a power of attorney, is not a fiduciary within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code. In cases when no legal trust has been created in the estate controlled by the agent and attorney, the liability to make a return rests with the principal.
( c ) *Effective date.* The rules of this section are effective as of January 1, 1997.
[T.D. 8697, 61 FR 66593, Dec. 18, 1996]
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.6514(b)-1 Credit against barred liability.

Any credit against a liability in respect of any taxable year shall be void if the collection of such liability would be barred by the applicable statute of limitations at the time such credit is made.

Mitigation of Effect of Period of Limitations
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.7483-1 Petition for review.

The decision of the Tax Court may be reviewed by a U.S. Court of Appeals as provided in section 7482 of the Code if a petition for such review is filed by either the Commissioner or the taxpayer within 3 months after the decision is rendered. If, however, a petition for such review is so filed by one party to the proceeding, a petition for review of the decision of the Tax Court may be filed by any other party to the proceeding within 4 months after such decision is rendered.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer        Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Amended

Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted), Bing Yeh, the President and
Chief Executive Officer of Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



In
Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 18th day of January, 2008.

|/s/BING YEHBing Yeh President and Chief Executive
Officer | 
|--------------------------------------------------------- | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, has been provided to Silicon Storage
Technology, Inc. and will be retained by Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This
certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the
Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

---



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 72 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.72
                                          Agreed to May 25, 1995        

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
  the fourth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-five

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, May 
25, 1995, it stand adjourned until noon on Tuesday, June 6, 1995, or 
until noon on the second day after Members are notified to reassemble 
pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs 
first; and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of 
business on Thursday, May 25, 1995, Friday, May 26, 1995, or Saturday, 
May 27, 1995, pursuant to a motion made by the majority leader or his 
designee, in accordance with this resolution, it stand recessed or 
adjourned until 10 a.m. on Monday, June 5, 1995, or until noon on the 
second day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 
2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the majority leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the minority leader of 
the House and the minority leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, 
in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.6057-2 Employee retirement benefit plans; notification of change in plan status. ( a ) *Change in plan status.* The plan administrator (within the meaning of section 414(g)) of an employee retirement benefit plan defined in § 301.6057-1(a)(3) (including a plan to which more than one employer contributes, as described in § 301.6057-1(b)(1)) must notify the Internal Revenue Service of the following changes in plan status— ( 1 ) A change in the name of the plan.
( 2 ) A change in the name or address of the plan administrator,
( 3 ) The termination of the plan, or
( 4 ) The merger or consolidation of the plan with another plan or the division of the plan into two or more plans.
( b ) *Notification.* A notification of a change in status described in paragraph (a) of this section, must be filed on the Annual Return/Report of Employee Benefit Plan (form 5500 series) for the plan year in which the change in status occurred. The notification must be filed at the time and place and in the manner prescribed in the form and any accompanying instructions.
( c ) *Penalty.* For amounts imposed in the case of failure to file a notification of a change in plan status required by section 6057(b) and this section, see section 6652(e)(2).
( d ) *Effective date.* This section is effective for changes in plan status occurring within plan years beginning after December 31, 1975.
[T.D. 7561, 43 FR 38006, Aug. 25, 1978]
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 150 (Thursday, August 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39305-39306]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18829]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program, 
Scientific Advisory Board

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is published in accordance with Section 10(a)(2) 
of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463). The topic of 
the meeting on September 9-11, 2009 is to review new start research and 
development projects requesting Strategic Environmental Research and 
Development Program funds in excess of $1M. This meeting is open to the 
public. Any interested person may attend, appear before, or file 
statements with the Scientific Advisory Board at the time and in the 
manner permitted by the Board.

DATES: Wednesday, September 9, 2009 from 9 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Thursday, 
September 10, 2009 from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., and Friday, September 11, 
2009 from 8:30 a.m. to 12 p.m.

[[Page 39306]]


ADDRESSES: SERDP Office Conference Center, 901 North Stuart Street, 
Suite 804, Arlington, VA 22203.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jonathan Bunger, SERDP Office, 901 
North Stuart Street, Suite 303, Arlington, VA or by telephone at (703) 
696-2126.

    Dated: July 31, 2009.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. E9-18829 Filed 8-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
- 1 - 

Alexander Van der Bellen 

Managing Director and 

Associate General Counsel 

Delta Air Lines, Inc. 

1212 New York Avenue NW 

Washington, DC 20005 

202.842.4184 

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com 

April 22, 2010 

via email and regulations.gov 

Ms. Dorothy Beard 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations 

West Building Ground Floor 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

 

 RE: Letters of Support for Delta Air Lines 

 U.S.- Haneda Service Proposals 

 Docket DOT-OST-2010-0018 

 

 

Dear Ms. Beard: 

Enclosed are 120 additional letters of support for Delta's U.S.-Haneda service proposals 

received from federal, state and local elected officials, airport directors, corporations, travel 

agencies and customers. These include recently received letters, and select letters that were 

previously submitted directly to the Secretary, but not yet registered on the docket. 

 

 

Respectfully submitted, 

Alexander Van der Bellen 

cc: Service List 

 

 

 






























































































































SERVICE LIST 

A copy of the foregoing document has been served this 22nd day of April, 2010, upon 

the following persons via email: 

carl.nelson@aa.com 

dan.weiss@coair.com 

hershel.kamen@coair.com 

rbkeiner@crowell.com 

mrosia@crowell.com 

gmurphy@crowell.com 

jeffrey.manley@united.com 

julie.oettinger@united.com 

howard.kass@usairways.com 

benjamin.slocum@usairways.com 

jhill@dowlohnes.com 

ldeavers@dowlohnes.com 

perkmann@dowlohnes.com 

dmendersbee@zsrlaw.com 

todd.homan@dot.gov 

paul.gretch@dot.gov 

keith.glatz@dot.gov 

esta.rosenberg@dot.gov 

byerlyjr@state.gov 

eugene_alford@ita.doc.gov 

joe.cambron@wcaa.us 

Ishiwata.K@portseattle.org 

Safora.I@portseattle.org 

mike.orr@airlineinfo.com
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                 5

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                            3,786,384
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        87,870
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          0
<PP&E>                                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    4,591,399
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     0
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                        4,355,158
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      4,591,399
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  2,752,444
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     88,506
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    1,791
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2,662,147
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               2,662,147
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2,662,147
<EPS-BASIC>                                             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0



</TABLE>
----

Action brought on 3 November 2006 — H v Council

(Case F-127/06)

(2006/C 326/171)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: H (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Forms of order sought

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant, who was retired with effect from 30 April 2003 due to her invalidity, was reintegrated on 1 November 2004. Following a number of absences due to illness, the Council once again retired her and granted her the invalidity allowance provided for in the first paragraph of Article 78 of the Staff Regulations, with effect from 1 April 2006.

In support of her action, the applicant claims that the Invalidity Committee did not rule on the origin of her illness or on a possible causal link between the deterioration of her illness and her working conditions. In those circumstances, the Council did not have the necessary information to determine whether the applicant was entitled to the allowance provided for by the first paragraph of Article 78 of the Staff Regulations or the one provided for in the fifth paragraph of that article. The Council's choice, less favourable to the applicant, is unlawful.

The applicant adds that the contested decision is vitiated by a manifest error of assessment as regards the nature of her illness, which indeed deteriorated due to her return to work and the stress linked to her carrying out her professional duties.

----
----

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the The Commissione Tributaria Provinciale (Regional Tax Court) Milan, Italy lodged on 18 September 2006 — Bakemark Italia Srl v Agenzia Entrate Ufficio Milano 1 (Local Tax Office) Milan

(Case C-386/06)

(2006/C 294/45)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

The Commissione Tributaria Provinciale (Regional Tax Court), Milan

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Bakemark Italia Srl

Defendant: Agenzia Entrate Ufficio (Local Tax Office) Milan

Question referred

Is Article 19(a)(1)(c), (d) and (e) of DPR No 633/72 incompatible with Article 17 of the Sixth Council Directive No 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977? (1)

----

(1)  OJ L145, p. 1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from the balance
sheet of CNL Income VIII,  Ltd. at  September  30,  2000,  and its  statement of
income  for the nine  months  then ended and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by
reference  to the Form 10-Q of CNL Income  Fund VIII,  Ltd.  for the nine months
ended September 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         1,994,015 <F2>
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  90,235
<ALLOWANCES>                                   459
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         17,776,938
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,895,952
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 31,620,682
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0<F1>
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     30,515,231
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   31,620,682
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,240,149
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  494,455
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2,562,367
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2,562,367
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,562,367
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0

<FN>
<F1>Due  to the  nature of its  industry,  CNL Income  Fund  VIII,  Ltd.  has an
unclassified  balance  sheet;  therefore,  no values are shown above for current
assets and current liabilities.
<F2>Includes 423,440 in restricted cash.</FN>

</TABLE>
GAYLA R. MAY CSR, RPR 27th Judicial District Court P. O. Box 747 Belton, TX 76513

(254) 933-5270

August 17, 2015

Mr. Jeffrey D. Kyle, Clerk Third District of Texas Court of Appeals P. O. Box 12547 Capitol Station Austin, TX 78711 Re: Trial Court No. 68919; State of Texas Vs. Tremaine Saunders; 27th District Court, Bell County, TX; Case No. 03-15-00273-CR Dear Mr. Kyle: In reference to the above-cap tioned cause, the filing date for the Reporter's Record was last Friday, August 14. I am waiting on one repo rter's record -- the jury trial -- and she notified me on Friday that she could not have it to me until this date: Monday, August 17. I replied to her it HAD TO BE today so I am waiting for her email with the PDF record. I hope to have the complete record filed this evening. Thank you for your continued assistance. Sincerely,

Gayla R. May, CSR, RPR

cc: Mr. Bob Odom Mrs. Erika Copeland
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of Z.B., J.B., * From the 326th District Court

and S.B., children, of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 10792-CX.

No. 11-23-00248-CV * April 11, 2024

* Memorandum Opinion by Williams, J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the 

order of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.6231(c)-3 Limitation on applicability of §§ 301.6231(c)-4 through 301.6231(c)-8. ( a ) *In general.* A provision of §§ 301.6231(c)-4 through 301.6231(c)-8 shall not apply with respect to partnership items arising in a partnership taxable year if, as of the date on which those items would otherwise begin to be treated as nonpartnership items under that provision— ( 1 ) A notice of final partnership administrative adjustment with respect to those items has been mailed to the tax matters partner; and
( 2 ) Either— ( i ) The period during which an action with respect to that final partnership administrative adjustment may be brought under section 6226 has expired and no such action has been brought; or
( ii ) The decision of the court in an action brought under section 6226 with respect to that final partnership administrative adjustment has become final.
( b ) *Effective date.* This section is applicable to partnership taxable years beginning on or after October 4, 2001. For years beginning prior to October 4, 2001, see § 301.6231(c)-3T contained in 26 CFR part 1, revised April 1, 2001.
[T.D. 8965, 66 FR 50560, Oct. 4, 2001]