alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Magellan Technology, Inc. Form 10-QSB  3rd Qtr 1998
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                        SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                                  110,035
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           296,142
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                           1,805,598
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      2,391,317
<PP&E>                                                1,113,581
<DEPRECIATION>                                          138,254
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        5,059,872
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 5,823,533
<BONDS>                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                  3,520
<OTHER-SE>                                            1,439,851
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          5,059,872
<SALES>                                               1,855,079
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      1,855,079
<CGS>                                                   331,775
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      4,210,034
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      288,359
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (2,800,116)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (2,800,116)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (2,800,116)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             (.17)
        

</TABLE>
39660.

#### JONES v. THE STATE.

Jordan, Judge.

C. J. Jones was tried and convicted in the Superior Court of Decatur County under an indictment in two counts charging him with the offense of burglary. His amended motion for new trial was denied and he excepted to that j udgment. *Iield:*

1. It was alleged in count 1 of the indictment that the defendant burglarized the place of business of T. L. Smith on April 30, 1961, and stole $13 and one portable transistor radio belonging to Mr. Smith. Upon the trial of the case a portable transistor radio found in the possession of the defendant was exhibited to Mr. Smith, a witness for the State, and he testified that the radio stolen from him was like the one being ■ exhibited to him but that he did not have a record of any serial numbers or any marks of identification and could not swear that the radio exhibited to him was the one stolen. There was no other evidence adduced as to the identity of said radio nor was there any other evidence connecting the defendant with the alleged crime other than the fact that said radio was found in his possession. Under these circumstances it was error as contended in special ground 12 for the trial court to admit said radio in evidence over the objection that it had not been identified as the stolen article. It is well settled that in a prosecution for the offense of burglary where the State relies upon the defendant’s recent possession of goods allegedly stolen or feloniously taken for conviction it is absolutely essential that the identity of the stolen articles be indisputably established. *Cannon v.*State, 12 Ga. App. 637, 639 (77 SE 920); *Rayfield v. State, 5*Ga. App. 816 (63 SE 920). There being insufficient evidence to identify said radio as having been among the stolen articles, the admission of the same in evidence over the defendant’s objection requires the grant of a new trial.

2. Special ground 13 which contends that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence one “Zippo” cigarette lighter inscribed with the name “Harry Legette,” which is alleged in count 2 of the indictment to have been stolen by the defendant, over the objection that there was no evidence that “there is no other cigarette lighter like it” is without merit. The burden was upon the State to identify positively the *615particular article introduced into evidence as being the one stolen as alleged in the indictment, and not to negate the existence of similar lighters.

Decided September 24, 1962.

*J. C. Hale, J. M. Pace, Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*Maston O’Neal, Solicitor General,*contra.

3. Since this case is to be tried again, the general grounds and special grounds 1-10 inclusive which merely elaborate upon the general grounds will not be ruled upon; nor will the remaining special ground be considered, as the error complained of therein will not likely recur upon the subsequent trial of this case.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Frankum, J., concur.*
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Community National
Bancorporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended March
31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the
date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Theron G. Reed, principal
executive and financial officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
         the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.


/s/ Theron G. Reed
------------------------------
Theron G. Reed
President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive and financial officer)

May 12, 2005
------------------------------
Date
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comment, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Wednesday, September 23, 2009.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Susan Gilbert at 1-888-912-1227 or (515) 564-6638.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee will be held Wednesday, September 23, 2009, at 3 p.m. Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Susan Gilbert. For more information please contact Ms. Gilbert at 1-888-912-1227 or (515) 564-6638 or write: TAP Office, 210 Walnut Street, Stop 5115, Des Moines, IA 50309 or contact us at the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

                        Dated:                         *July 31, 2009.*

Shawn F. Collins,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. E9-18787 Filed 8-5-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
§ 20.6065-1 Verification of returns. ( a ) *Penalties of perjury.* If a return, statement, or other document made under the provisions of Chapter 11 or Subtitle F of the Code or the regulations thereunder with respect to any tax imposed by Chapter 11 of the Code, or the form and instructions issued with respect to such return, statement, or other document, requires that it shall contain or be verified by a written declaration that it is made under the penalties of perjury, it must be so verified by the person or persons required to sign such return, statement or other document. In addition, any other statement or document submitted under any provision of Chapter 11 or Subtitle F of the Code or regulations thereunder with respect to any tax imposed by Chapter 11 of the Code may be required to contain or be verified by a written declaration that it is made under the penalties of perjury.
( b ) *Oath.* Any return, statement, or other document required to be submitted under Chapter 11 or Subtitle F of the Code or regulations prescribed thereunder with respect to any tax imposed by Chapter 11 of the Code may be required to be verified by an oath.
[T.D. 6600, 27 FR 4986, May 29, 1962]
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 153 (Friday, August 8, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46440-46441]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-18825]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9915-01-Region-4; CERCLA-04-2014-3764]

J.J. Seifert Machine Shop Superfund Site; Sun City, Hillsborough 
County, Florida; Notice of Settlement

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of settlement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under 122(h) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), the United States 
Environmental Protection Agency has entered into a settlement with 
Pamela S. Ahlen, J.J. Seifert Land Company and J.J. Seifert Machine 
Co., Inc. concerning the J.J. Seifert Machine Shop Superfund Site 
located in Sun City, Hillsborough County, Florida. The settlement is 
based on a financial analysis and addresses liability for past and 
future costs concerning work being performed at the Site and allows for 
the sale of the property.

DATES: The Agency will consider public comments on the settlement until 
September 8, 2014. The Agency will consider all comments received and 
may modify or withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments 
received disclose facts or considerations which indicate that the 
amended settlement is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.

[[Page 46441]]

ADDRESSES: Copies of the settlement are available from the Agency by 
contacting Ms. Paula V. Painter, Environmental Protection Specialist 
using the contact information provided in this notice. Comments may 
also be submitted by referencing the Site's name through one of the 
following methods:
     Internet: www.epa.gov/region4/superfund/programs/enforcement/enforcement.html U.S. Mail: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Superfund 
Division, Attn: Paula V. Painter, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, 
Georgia 30303.
     Email: Painter.Paula@epa.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paula V. Painter at 404/562-8887

    Dated: July 29, 2014.
Anita L. Davis,
Chief, Superfund Enforcement & Information Management Branch, Superfund 
Division.
[FR Doc. 2014-18825 Filed 8-7-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
§ 1.168A-4 Definitions. As used in the regulations under section 168, the term— ( a ) “Certifying authority” means the certifying authority designated by the President by Executive order.
( b ) “Emergency facility” means any facility, land, building, machinery, or equipment, or any part thereof, the acquisition of which occurred after December 31, 1949, or the construction, reconstruction, erection, or installation of which was completed after such date, and with respect to which a certificate under section 168(e) has been made. In the case of an application for a certificate under section 168(e) which is filed after March 23, 1951, only the part of any such facility which is constructed, reconstructed, erected, or installed by any person not earlier than six months prior to the filing of such application, and which is certified in accordance with section 168(e), shall be deemed to be an emergency facility, notwithstanding that the other part of such facility was constructed, reconstructed, erected, or installed earlier than six months prior to the filing of such application. However, if the facility is one described in section 168(e)(2)(C) and the application was filed after September 1, 1958, and on or before December 2, 1958, the preceding sentence shall not apply. The term “emergency facility,” as so defined, may include, among other things, improvements of land, such as the construction of roads, bridges, and airstrips, and the dredging of channels.
( c ) “Emergency period” means the period beginning on January 1, 1950, and ending on the date on which the President proclaims that the utilization of a substantial portion of the certified emergency facilities is no longer required in the interest of national defense.
[T.D. 6500, 25 FR 11402, Nov. 26, 1960; 25 FR 14021, Dec. 21, 1960. Redesignated by T.D. 8116, 51 FR 46619, Dec. 24, 1986]
Order entered January 15, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 01072
- CR EXZAYVIA COSBY, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F12
- 01027
- U



### O RDER
On January 15, 2015 , the State fil e d a motion asking us to extend th e time for filing the
State’s brief. The motion is GRANTED

. The State’s brief is due in this Court no later than Wednesday, February 11, 2015 , at 9 a.m

. N o further extensions of time will be granted, absent exceptional circumstances.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 53

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas United States diplomatic and economic security interests in East Asia have caused the United States to

maintain a policy of recognizing the People’s Republic of

China while maintaining solidarity with the democratic

aspirations of the people of Taiwan;

Whereas the Republic of China on Taiwan (known as Taiwan) is the United States sixth largest trading partner

and an economic powerhouse buying more than twice as

much annually from the United States as do the

1,200,000,000 Chinese of the People’s Republic of China;
2

HCON 53 EH

Whereas the American people are eager for expanded trade

opportunities with Taiwan, the possessor of the world’s

second largest foreign exchange reserves;

Whereas the United States interests are served by supporting

democracy and human rights abroad;

Whereas Taiwan is a model emerging democracy, with a free

press, free elections, stable democratic institutions, and

human rights protections;

Whereas vigorously contested elections conducted on Taiwan

in December 1994 were extraordinarily free and fair;

Whereas United States interests are best served by policies

that treat Taiwan’s leaders with respect and dignity;

Whereas President Lee Teng-hui of Taiwan, a Ph.D. graduate of Cornell University, has been invited to pay a private visit to his alma mater and to attend the annual

USA–ROC Economic Council Conference in Anchorage,

Alaska;

Whereas there are no legitimate grounds for excluding President Lee Teng-hui from paying private visits;

Whereas the Senate of the United States voted several times

in 1994 to welcome President Lee to visit the United

States; and

Whereas Public Law 103–416 provides that the President of

Taiwan shall be welcome in the United States at any

time to discuss a host of important bilateral issues: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 President should promptly indicate that the United States
3

HCON 53 EH

1 will welcome a private visit by President Lee Teng-hui to

2 his alma mater, Cornell University, and will welcome a

3 transit stop by President Lee in Anchorage, Alaska, to at4 tend the USA–ROC Economic Council Conference.

5 SEC. 2. The Clerk of the House of Representatives

6 shall transmit a copy of this concurrent resolution to the

7 President.

Passed the House of Representatives May 2, 1995.

Attest:

Clerk.
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 53

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding a

States.Republic of China on Taiwan to the Unitedprivate visit by President Lee Teng-hui of the
exv10w11



 





Exhibit 10.11




QUICKSILVER RESOURCES INC.

Description of Non-Employee Director Compensation




     Beginning in 2006, each non-employee director of Quicksilver Resources Inc. receives an annual
fee of $166,250. Each non-employee director is paid $60,000 of the annual fee in restricted stock
under the Quicksilver Resources Inc. 2006 Equity Plan (the “Plan”). Each non-employee director is
paid the remaining $106,250 of the annual fee in cash, unless the non-employee director makes an
appropriate election under the Plan, in which case the individual receives $60,000 of the remaining
$106,250 of the annual fee in restricted stock or options to purchase common stock.
Amendment No. 1 Prudential Insurance Co. of America Deferred Compensation Plan



 Exhibit 10.12 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 TO THE 
 THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA 
 DEFERRED COMPENSATION
PLAN 
 Pursuant to the power reserved to it in Section 8.1(a) of The Prudential Insurance Company of America Deferred
Compensation Plan (the “Plan”), The Prudential Insurance Company of America (the “Company”) hereby amends the Plan, effective January 1, 2005, as follows: 
 1.   Section 3.2(b) of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following new paragraph to end thereto: 
 “Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, if a Participant filed a Participation Agreement with respect to any Eligible Compensation earned
during 2005 (the “2005 Deferral Commitment”), that portion of the 2005 Deferral Commitment that is not withheld during 2005 as a result of administrative error shall be cancelled and distributed to the Participant in 2005 in accordance
with the transition relief provided in IRS Notice 2005-1.” 
 * * * 
 To record the adoption of this Amendment No. 1 to the Plan, the Company has caused its officer to execute these presents this 15th day of
December, 2005. 
  

			
	 THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE
 COMPANY OF AMERICA

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Haroon Saeed

		 	Haroon Saeed
		 	Vice President - Compensation
**Exhibit 31(a)**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, William J. Doyle, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Potash Corporationof Saskatchewan Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
   (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;    (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and    (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
   (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and    (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.         By:  /s/ William J. Doyle   William J. Doyle    *President and Chief Executive Officer*   
Date: November 5, 2004
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7342
JON DREUITT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ABDUL JAMALUDEEN, Medical Doctor; BETH HOLCOMB, Registered Nurse, Medical Department Supervisor, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:06-cv-00061-JRS) Submitted: April 28, 2008 Decided: August 7, 2008 Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jon Dreuitt, Appellant Pro Se. John David McChesney, Elizabeth Martin Muldowney, RAWLS & MCNELIS, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Jon Dreuitt appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dreuitt v. Jamaludeen , No. 3:06-cv-00061-JRS (E.D. Va. Aug. 29, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED