alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 110 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                        Calendar No. 69

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              S. RES. 110

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

                 Relating to the purchase of calendars.

_______________________________________________________________________

                May 20 (legislative day, April 19), 1993

                         Placed on the calendar

                                                        Calendar No. 69
103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 110

                 Relating to the purchase of calendars.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                May 20 (legislative day, April 19), 1993

Mr. Ford, from the Committee on Rules and Administration, reported the 
    following original resolution; which was placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
                 Relating to the purchase of calendars.

    Resolved, That the Committee on Rules and Administration is 
authorized to expend from the contingent fund of the Senate, upon 
vouchers approved by the chairman of that committee, not to exceed 
$76,960 for the purchase of one hundred and four thousand 1994 ``We The 
People'' calendars. The calendars shall be distributed as prescribed by 
the committee.
```
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICING COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2015-4 for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2015 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby certify and represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 26, 2015, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2015-4 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC./s/ Jennifer M. DavisName: Jennifer M. DavisTitle:   Deputy Chief Financial OfficerDate:   March 29, 2016/s/ Rich MorrinName: Rich MorrinTitle:   Chief Operating OfficerDate:   March 29, 2016
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Properties III
L.P. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 29, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Neal Ludeke, Chief Financial Officer of Richman Housing Credits
Inc., general partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties III L.P., general partner
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to
(S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.



/s/ Neal Ludeke
---------------------------------
Neal Ludeke
Chief Financial Officer of Richman
Housing Credits Inc., general partner of
Richman Tax Credit Properties III L.P.,
general partner of the Company
November 13, 2002
§ 1.665(e)-2 Application of separate share rule. In trusts to which the separate share rule of section 663(c) is applicable for any taxable year, subpart D (section 665 and following), part I, subchapter J, of the Code, is applied as if each share were a separate trust. Thus, “undistributed net income” and the amount of an “accumulation distribution” are computed separately for each share. The “taxes imposed on the trust” are allocated as follows: ( a ) There is first allocated to each separate share that portion of the “taxes imposed on the trust”, computed before the allowance of credits under section 642(a), which bears the same relation to the total that the distributable net income of the separate share bears to the distributable net income of the trust, adjusted for this purpose as follows: ( 1 ) There is excluded from distributable net income of the trust and of each separate share any tax-exempt interest, foreign income of a foreign trust, and excluded dividends, to the extent such amounts are included in distributable net income pursuant to section 643(a) (5), (6), and (7); and
( 2 ) The distributable net income of the trust is reduced by any deductions allowable under section 661 for amounts paid, credited, or required to be distributed during the taxable year, and the distributable net income of each separate share is reduced by any such deduction allocable to that share.
( b ) The taxes so determined for each separate share are then reduced by that portion of the credits against tax allowable to the trust under section 642(a) in computing the “taxes imposed on the trust” which bear the same relation to the total that the items of income allocable to the separate share with respect to which the credit is allowed bear to the total of such items of the trust. The amount of taxes imposed on the trust allocable to a separate share as so determined is then reduced by the amount of the taxes allowed under sections 667 and 668 as a credit to a beneficiary of the separate share on account of any accumulation distribution determined for any taxable year intervening between the year for which the determination is made and the year of an accumulation distribution with respect to which the determination is made. See paragraph (b) of § 1.665(d)-1.
[T.D. 6500, 25 FR 11814, Nov. 26, 1960, as amended by T.D. 6989, 34 FR 741, Jan. 17, 1969. Redesignated by T.D. 6989, 34 FR 736, Jan. 17, 1969]
PUBLIC LAW 115–29—APR. 19, 2017 131 STAT. 133 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S.J. Res. 36: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 163 (2017): 

Mar. 27, considered and passed Senate. 

Apr. 6, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–29 

115th Congress 

Joint Resolution 

Providing for the appointment of Roger W. Ferguson as a citizen regent of the 

Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Statutes (20 U.S.C. 43), 

the vacancy of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, 

in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by reason 

of the expiration of the term of Robert P. Kogod of the District 

of Columbia on May 5, 2017, is filled by the appointment of Roger 

W. Ferguson of the District of Columbia. The appointment is for 

a term of 6 years, beginning on May 6, 2017, or the date of 

the enactment of this joint resolution, whichever occurs later. 

Approved April 19, 2017. 

Effective date. 

Apr. 19, 2017 

[S.J. Res. 36] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
#### § 1.832-6 Policyholders of mutual fire or flood insurance companies operating on the basis of premium deposits.

For purposes of determining his taxable income for any taxable year, a taxpayer insured by a mutual fire or flood insurance company under a policy for which the premium deposit is the same regardless of the length of the term for which the policy is written, and who is entitled to have returned or credited to his on the cancellation or expiration of such policy the unabsorbed portion of the premium deposit not required for losses, expenses, or establishment of reserves, may, if such amount is otherwise deductible under this chapter, deduct so much of his premium deposit as was absorbed by the company during the taxpayer's taxable year. The amount of the premium deposit absorbed during the taxpayer's taxable year shall be determined in accordance with the schedule of unabsorbed premium deposit returns in effect for the company during such taxable year. If the taxpayer is unable to determine the applicable rate of absorption in effect during his taxable year, he shall compute his deduction on the basis of the rate of absorption in effect at the end of the company's taxable year which next preceded the end of the taxpayer's taxable year. In such a case, an appropriate adjustment will be made upon the final determination of the rate of absorption applicable to the taxable year.

[T.D. 6681, 28 FR 11130, Oct. 17, 1963]
§ 20.2204-1 Discharge of executor from personal liability. ( a ) *General rule.* The executor of a decedent's estate may make written application to the applicable internal revenue officer with whom the estate tax return is required to be filed, as provided in § 20.6091-1, for a determination of the Federal estate tax and for a discharge of personal liability therefrom. Within 9 months after receipt of the application, or if the application is made before the return is filed then within 9 months after the return is filed, the executor will be notified of the amount of the tax and, upon payment thereof, he will be discharged from personal liability for any deficiency in the tax thereafter found to be due. If no such notification is received, the executor is discharged at the end of such 9 month period from personal liability for any deficiency thereafter found to be due. The discharge of the executor from personal liability under this section applies only to him in his personal capacity and to his personal assets. The discharge is not applicable to his liability as executor to the extent of the assets of the estate in his possession or control. Further, the discharge is not to operate as a release of any part of the gross estate from the lien for estate tax for any deficiency that may thereafter be determined to be due.
( b ) *Special rule in the case of extension of time for payment of tax.* In addition to the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section, an executor of the estate of a decedent dying after December 31, 1970, may make written application to be discharged from personal liability for the amount of Federal estate tax for which the time for payment has been extended under section 6161, 6163, or 6166. In such a case, the executor will be notified of the amount of bond, if any, to be furnished within 9 months after receipt of the application, or, if the application is made before the return is filed, within 9 months after the return is filed. The amount of any bond required under the provisions of this paragraph shall not exceed the amount of tax the payment of which has been extended. Upon furnishing the bond in the form required under § 301.7101-1 of this chapter (Regulations on Procedure and Administration), or upon receipt of the notification that no bond is required, the executor will be discharged from personal liability for the tax the payment of which has been extended. If no notification is received, the executor is discharged at the end of such 9 month period from personal liability for the tax the payment of which has been extended.
[T.D. 7238, 37 FR 28720, Dec. 29, 1972, as amended by T.D. 7941, 49 FR 4468, Feb. 7, 1984]
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-19-00081-CR

JOHN FITZGERALD DAVIS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 188th District Court

Gregg County, Texas

Trial Court No. 48028-A

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.
2

O RDER

Appellant John Fitzgerald Davis was convicted of unlawfully possessing a firearm and was 

sentenced to six years’ imprisonment. Davis has appealed from that conviction and the resulting 

sentence. On August 7, 2019, Davis’s court-appointed appellate counsel, Jason D. Cassel, filed 

an Anders1 brief, and on September 9, 2019, Davis filed a pro se motion for access to the appellate 

record for purposes of preparing a response to his counsel’s Anders brief. Under Kelly v. State,

2

we are required to enter an order specifying the procedure to be followed to ensure Davis’s access 

to the record.

Cassel advised this Court on September 16, 2019, that he would mail a complete paper 

copy of the appellate record to Davis. The record contains no digitally recorded exhibits. Allowing 

fifteen days for the record to be delivered to Davis and giving Davis thirty days to prepare his pro 

se response, we hereby set October 31, 2019, as the deadline for Davis to file his pro se response 

to his counsel’s Anders brief.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

DATE: September 17, 2019

 1

See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

2

Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 321–22 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 2011

- NM

- 225

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7309 

To repeal certain formula grants under the Elementary and Secondary 

Education Act of 1965 and use such funds to award block grants to States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2024 

Mr. BURCHETT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To repeal certain formula grants under the Elementary and 

Secondary Education Act of 1965 and use such funds 

to award block grants to States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Building Lasting Op5 portunities for Community K–12 Act’’ or the ‘‘BLOCK 

6 Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. BLOCK GRANTS TO STATES. 

8 Beginning with fiscal year 2025, and each succeeding 

9 fiscal year thereafter, the Secretary of Education shall 

10 award block grants to each State in an amount that the 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 7309 IH

1 State received under the provisions listed in section 3 for 

2 fiscal year 2024. 

3 SEC. 3. REPEAL OF CERTAIN FORMULA GRANTS UNDER 

4 THE ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDU5 CATION ACT OF 1965. 

6 On October 1, 2024, the following provisions of the 

7 Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 

8 U.S.C. 6301 et seq.) shall be repealed: 

9 (1) Grants to local educational agencies under 

10 part A of title I (20 U.S.C. 6311 et seq.). 

11 (2) State Assessment Grants under part B of 

12 title I (20 U.S.C. 6361 et seq.). 

13 (3) Migrant Education under part C of title I 

14 (20 U.S.C. 6391 et seq.). 

15 (4) Neglected and Delinquent under part D of 

16 title I (20 U.S.C. 6421 et seq.). 

17 (5) Supporting Effective Instruction State 

18 Grants under part A of title II (20 U.S.C. 6611 et 

19 seq.). 

20 (6) English Language Acquisition under part A 

21 of title III (20 U.S.C. 6811 et seq.). 

22 (7) Student Support and Academic Enrichment 

23 Grants under part A of title IV (20 U.S.C. 7111 et 

24 seq.). 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 7309 IH

1 (8) The 21st Century Learning Centers under 

2 part B of title IV (20 U.S.C. 7171 et seq.). 

3 (9) Rural Education under part B of title V (20 

4 U.S.C. 7341 et seq.). 

5 (10) Indian Education Formula Grants to 

6 Local Educational Agencies under subpart 1 of part 

7 A of title VI (20 U.S.C. 7421 et seq.). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### § 1.275-1 Deduction denied in case of certain taxes.

For description of the taxes for which a deduction is denied under section 275, see paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (e), and (h) of § 1.164-2.

[T.D. 6780, 29 FR 18148, Dec. 22, 1964, as amended by T.D. 7767, 46 FR 11264, Feb. 6, 1981]
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

ETHICON LLC,

Appellant

v.

INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC.,

Appellee

______________________

2020-1453

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2018-

00935.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

ANISH R. DESAI, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, New 

York, NY, for appellant. Also represented by ELIZABETH 

WEISWASSER; BRIAN E. FERGUSON, CHRISTOPHER 

MARANDO, PRIYATA PATEL, CHRISTOPHER PEPE, Washington, DC.

 STEVEN KATZ, Fish & Richardson P.C., Boston, MA, for 

appellee. Also represented by JOHN C. PHILLIPS, San Diego, CA.

 ______________________

Case: 20-1453 Document: 25 Page: 1 Filed: 03/05/2021
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

 PER CURIAM (O’MALLEY, CLEVENGER, and STOLL, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

March 5, 2021

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 20-1453 Document: 25 Page: 2 Filed: 03/05/2021
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-18-00143-CR

PATRICK HENRY FEATHERSTON,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 1

Brazos County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17-00865-CRM-CCL1

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Patrick Henry Featherston has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). We have not issued a decision in this appeal, and Featherston

personally signed the motion. The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

We also grant Featherston’s request that the mandate issue at this Court’s earliest 

convenience. See id. R. 18.3(c). The Clerk’s Office is directed to issue the mandate 

concurrently with the rendering of the judgment. 
Featherston v. State Page 2

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed November 7, 2018

Do not publish

[CR25]
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.61

                              TERMINATION ADDENDUM

            AMENDED AND RESTATED QUOTA SHARE RETROCESSION AGREEMENT

                                 BY AND BETWEEN

                      PLATINUM UNDERWRITERS BERMUDA, LTD.

                                      and

                    PLATINUM UNDERWRITERS REINSURANCE, INC.

     IT IS HEREBY MUTUALLY AGREED that effective December 31, 2006, the Amended
and Restated Quota Share Retrocession Agreement dated as of January 1, 2006, by
and between Platinum Underwriters Reinsurance, Inc., a Maryland domiciled
insurance company (the "Retrocedent"), and Platinum Underwriters Bermuda, Ltd.
(the "Retrocessionaire"), is terminated pursuant to this Termination Addendum (
the "Addendum").

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Addendum to be executed in
duplicate by their respective officers duly authorized so to do, on the date set
forth below.

                                 Platinum Underwriters Bermuda, Ltd.

                                 By:   /s/ Les Waters
                                      --------------------------------------
                                      Name:  Les Waters
                                      Title: Vice President
                                      Date:  February 19, 2007

                                 Platinum Underwriters Reinsurance, Inc.

                                 By:   /s/ Kevin Marine
                                      --------------------------------------
                                      Name:  Kevin Marine
                                      Title: Senior Vice President
                                      Date:  February 12, 2007
**EXHIBIT 31.2**







**RULE 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302**


**OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






I, Blaise B. Bettendorf, certify that:
  1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Summit Financial Corporation;2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent calendar quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
 Date: November 1, 2004Blaise B. Bettendorf, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer