alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998             SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998             JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         116,575                 116,575
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  448,969                 448,969
<ALLOWANCES>                                    28,988                  28,988
<INVENTORY>                                    876,111                 876,111
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,447,148               1,447,148
<PP&E>                                         120,348                 120,348
<DEPRECIATION>                                  56,057                  56,057
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,575,976               1,575,976
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          954,690                 954,690
<BONDS>                                        541,616                 541,616
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           546                     546
<OTHER-SE>                                      68,258                  68,258
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,575,976               1,575,976
<SALES>                                      6,627,104               2,129,192
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,627,104               2,129,192
<CGS>                                        6,309,016               2,029,723
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,309,016               2,029,723
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               206,509                  62,901
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 8,505                     122
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              34,250                   9,558
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 77,329                  27,010
<INCOME-TAX>                                    30,164                  10,538
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             47,165                  16,472
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    47,165                  16,472
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .99                     .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .97                     .34


</TABLE>
#### St. Nicholas Syrian Orthodox Church et al. *v.*Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Trumbull et al.

It appearing that the named defendant in the above-entitled case has failed to prosecute its appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Fairfield County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed.

*658Argued June 4

decided June *4,*1968

*Aaron A. Levine,*for the appellant (named defendant).

The appellant filed a motion for reargument which was denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                       DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                          JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                            SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                        2,182
<SECURITIES>                                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                17,708
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    402
<INVENTORY>                                                  22,854
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             45,474
<PP&E>                                                       61,307
<DEPRECIATION>                                               25,448
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               89,568
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        23,932
<BONDS>                                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                             0
<PREFERRED>                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                      5,435
<OTHER-SE>                                                        0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 89,568
<SALES>                                                      86,070
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             86,070
<CGS>                                                        72,702
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                85,868
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               (352)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            1,822
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              (1,268)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    270
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                               0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                   0
<CHANGES>                                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 (1,538)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                   (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 (0.28)




</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-01-00382-CV

United States Wireless Cable, Inc., Appellant

v.

World Satellite Network, Inc., Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 261ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. GN000512, HONORABLE PETER M. LOWRY, JUDGE PRESIDING 

Because appellant United States Wireless Cable, Inc. has failed to file an appellant’s

brief, we will dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).

The Clerk of this Court filed the notice of appeal and the clerk’s record in this cause

on July 12, 2001. A reporter’s record was not filed. Thus, appellant’s brief was due August 13.

By postcard dated October 8, 2001, the Clerk of this Court notified the parties that

the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution unless appellant tendered a motion for

extension of time by October 18 reasonably explaining the failure to file a brief. Thus far, appellant

has submitted neither a brief nor a motion for extension of time to file a brief.
2

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution on our own motion. See

id. 42.3(b).

 

David Puryear, Justice

Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices Smith and Puryear

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: December 13, 2001

Do Not Publish
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 17 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 17

 Relating to the treatment of Social Security under any constitutional 
                 amendment requiring a balanced budget.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 23, 1995

 Mr. Flanagan (for himself, Mr. Hayworth, Mr. Dreier, Mr. LaHood, Mr. 
Ewing, Mr. Paxon, Ms. Molinari, Mr. Largent, Mr. Barr, Mr. Talent, Mr. 
Watts of Oklahoma, Mr. Latham, Mr. LaTourette, Mr. Frisa, Mr. Wamp, Mr. 
English of Pennsylvania, Mr. Hostettler, Mr. Hastert, Mr. McIntosh, Mr. 
  Ensign, Mr. Nethercutt, Mr. Crane, Mr. DeLay, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. 
   Moorhead, Mr. Hancock, Mr. Ehrlich, Mr. Funderburk, Mr. Ney, Mr. 
    Weller, Mr. Camp, Mr. Forbes, Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut, Mr. 
  Christensen, Mr. Boehner, Mr. Schiff, Mr. Bryant of Tennessee, Mr. 
 Martini, Mr. Hastings of Washington, Mr. Davis, Mr. Hyde, Mr. Leach, 
Mr. Chabot, Mr. Brownback, Mr. Hilleary, Mr. McCollum, Mr. Walker, Mr. 
Solomon, Mr. Armey, Mr. Graham, Mr. Ganske, Mr. Longley, Mr. Chambliss, 
Mr. Norwood, Mr. Heineman, Mrs. Cubin, and Mr. Chrysler), submitted the 
following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                                 Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Relating to the treatment of Social Security under any constitutional 
                 amendment requiring a balanced budget.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, for the purposes of any constitutional amendment requiring a 
balanced budget, the appropriate committees of the House and the Senate 
shall report to their respective Houses implementing legislation to 
achieve a balanced budget without increasing the receipts or reducing 
the disbursements of the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust 
Fund and the Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund to achieve that 
goal.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Small Business/Self Employed Issue Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, September 24, 2009.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Janice Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6098.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Small Business/Self Employed Issue Committee will be held Thursday, September 24, 2009, at 8:30 a.m. Pacific Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to                           ( print page 39381)                        limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Janice Spinks. For more information please contact Ms. Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6098, or write TAP Office, 915 2nd Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, WA 98174 or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: July 30, 2009

 Shawn F. Collins,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. E9-18788 Filed 8-5-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 181 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 428
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 181

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 5, 1996

                  Received and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Agriculture 
  should dispose of all remaining commodities in the disaster reserve 
 maintained under the Agricultural Act of 1970 to relieve the distress 
of livestock producers whose ability to maintain livestock is adversely 
affected by disaster conditions existing in certain areas of the United 
             States, such as prolonged drought or flooding.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, in light of the prolonged drought and other adverse weather 
conditions existing in certain areas of the United States, the 
Secretary of Agriculture should promptly dispose of all commodities in 
the disaster reserve 
maintained under section 813 of the Agricultural Act of 1970 (7 U.S.C. 
1427a) to relieve the distress of livestock producers whose ability to 
maintain livestock is adversely affected by the disaster conditions, 
such as prolonged drought or flooding.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 4, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 428

104th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 181

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

  Expressing the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Agriculture 
  should dispose of all remaining commodities in the disaster reserve 
 maintained under the Agricultural Act of 1970 to relieve the distress 
of livestock producers whose ability to maintain livestock is adversely 
affected by disaster conditions existing in certain areas of the United 
             States, such as prolonged drought or flooding.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              June 5, 1996

                  Received and placed on the calendar
```
May26, 2012 Docket Management Facility U.S. Department ofTransportation 400 Seventh St. S.W. Washington, DC, 20590 Reference: Comments to EAA/AOPA petition forexemption, DOTDocket No. FAA-2012-0350. Dear Sirs; 

### ) r:

I strongly support this petition for exemption that EAA and AOPA submitted and urge the FAA to approve it as soon as possible. This exemption request has a lot of strong safety benefits, induding allowing pilots to continue to fly their currently owned standard category aircraft and the on-line medical education course. It does not, in my opinion, have any negative impact on aviation safety or the safety of people 

## I property on the surface. Please approve this exemption request immediately! I I'd like to add the following personal comments for your consideration:



# .0

# ~~4(?~ Sincerely, · 

# r:J!**~** Name: ).. 

# Y rV1(/ 

# p 1'1 () 

# C

# A)..L State: {;-

# /11 Phone number: 

# ,!f?

# f!-

# J C ,)- 

# GqJ 

# S" I . c- '

. ..._;(;
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 5, 2019

s0225 

# Order

Clerk March 5, 2019

156724

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 156724

COA: 339876

Oakland CC: 2016

- 258995

- FC

ERIK DAVON THOMPKINS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the Oct ober 3, 2017

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Oakland Circuit Court for further

proceedings consistent with this order. On remand, appointed couns el may file, within

six months of the date of this order, any necessary or appropriate postconviction motions

in the trial court as to the defendant’s December 13, 2016 plea

- based conviction. If a

postconviction motion is filed in the trial court, counsel may file an application for leave

to appeal to the Court of Appeals within six months of the order disposing of that motion.

The defendant was effectively deprived, through no fault of his own, of the opportunity to

have appointed appellate counsel file a timely motion to withdraw the plea. The Court of

Appeals erred when it concluded that the defendant had failed to demonstrate that the

issue should be decided initially by the trial court. In all other respects, leave to appeal is

DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should

now be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
§ 11.412(c)-11 Election with respect to bonds. ( a ) *In general.* Section 412(c)(2)(B) provides that, at the election of the administrator of a plan which includes a trust qualified under section 401(a) or of a plan which satisfies the requirements of section 403(a) or section 405(a), the value of a bond or other evidence of indebtedness which is held by the plan and which is not in default as to principal or interest may be determined on an amortized basis running from initial cost at purchase to the amount payable at maturity (or, in the case of a bond which is callable prior to maturity, the earliest call date). So long as this election is in effect, the value of any such evidence of indebtedness shall, for purposes of section 412, be determined on such an amortized basis rather than on a method taking into account fair market value as described in section 412(c)(2)(A).
( b ) *Manner of making election.* The election to value evidences of indebtedness in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section shall be made by a statement to that effect attached to and filed as a part of the annual return of the plan required under section 6058 of the Code.
( c ) *Effect of election.* The election provided by section 412(c)(2)(B), once made, will affect the valuation of all evidences of indebtedness, not in default as to principal or interest, which are held by the plan for the plan year for which the election is made and any evidences of indebtedness which are subsequently acquired by the plan. The value of any evidence of indebtedness which is in default as of the valuation date for the plan year must be determined on the basis of any reasonable actuarial method of valuation which takes into account fair market value in accordance with section 412(c)(2)(A) and must continue to be so valued until the indebtedness is no longer in default.
( d ) *Consent to revoke required* — ( 1 ) *In general.* An election made in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section may be revoked only if consent to revoke the election is obtained from the Secretary or his delegate.
( 2 ) *Manner of obtaining permission for revocation.* [Reserved]
(Secs. 302(c)(2)(B), 412(c)(2)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (88 Stat. 871, 914))
[T.D. 7335, 39 FR 44009, Dec. 20, 1974]
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 14-1295

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Larry Big Boy

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of South Dakota - Rapid City

____________

 Submitted: June 24, 2014

Filed: November 20, 2014

[Unpublished]

____________

Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

While Larry Big Boy was serving a period of supervised release following

release from imprisonment on a conviction for attempting to sexually engage in
contact with a minor, the district court found he had violated a condition of his

1

supervised release and imposed a revocation sentence consisting of 6 months in

prison and 2 years of supervised release. On appeal, Big Boy’s counsel moves to

withdraw, and raises two arguments: (1) the revocation prison sentence is

unreasonable and (2) the court abused its discretion by continuing all of the

conditions of supervised release from Big Boy’s original term, without assessing

whether each condition was still necessary. 

Since briefing in this case was completed, counsel for Big Boy advised the

Court that Big Boy has completed his six-month revocation prison sentence and that

the issue of the reasonableness of the prison sentence is now moot. Accordingly, the

appeal as to this issue is dismissed as moot.

At the revocation hearing, Big Boy did not voice any concerns about the

propriety of the reimposed release conditions, and the court did not err, plainly or

otherwise, in not examining sua sponte whether the conditions were still warranted. 

See United States v. Simons, 614 F.3d 475, 478-81 (8th Cir. 2010); United States v.

Lebeau, 490 Fed. Appx. 831, 832 (8th Cir. 2012) (unpublished per curiam)

(defendant should not benefit from supervised release violations, where special

conditions of supervised release would have remained in effect at time in question if

defendant had not violated supervised release). Accordingly, we affirm. 

As to counsel’s motion to withdraw, we conclude that allowing counsel to

withdraw at this time would not be consistent with the Eighth Circuit’s 1994

Amendment to Part V of the Plan to Implement the CriminalJustice Act of 1964. We 

The Honorable Karen E. Schreier, United States DistrictJudge for the District 1

of South Dakota.

-2-
therefore deny counsel’s motion to withdraw as premature, without prejudice to

counsel refiling the motion upon fulfilling the duties set forth in the Amendment.

______________________________

-3-
§ 26.6107-1 Tax return preparer must furnish copy of return to taxpayer and must retain a copy or record. ( a ) *In general.* A person who is a signing tax return preparer of any return or claim for refund of generation-skipping transfer tax under chapter 13 of subtitle B of the Internal Revenue Code shall furnish a completed copy of the return or claim for refund to the taxpayer, and retain a completed copy or record in the manner stated in § 1.6107-1 of this chapter.
( b ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section is applicable to returns and claims for refund filed after December 31, 2008.
[T.D. 9436, 73 FR 78452, Dec. 22, 2008]
Order entered August 8, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 19 - 00907 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF H .B.C., A CHILD On Appeal from the 397th Judicial District Court

Grayso n County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. FA - 17 - 1672



### O RDER Before the Court is the request of Paula Thomas, Official Court Reporter for the 397th Judicial District Court, for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. We GRANT the request and exten d the time to Monday, August 19, 2019

. /s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE