alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONDENSED  CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOUND IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         4,271
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  27,626
<ALLOWANCES>                                   684
<INVENTORY>                                    23,406
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               57,146
<PP&E>                                         15,069
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4,526
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 72,939
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          37,565
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       60,186
<OTHER-SE>                                     (25,298)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   72,939
<SALES>                                        70,734
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               76,466
<CGS>                                          60,945
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  86,312
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (698)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             75
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,223)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   536
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,759)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,759)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.41)





</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6346
ALBERT CURTIS MILLS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus EUGENE NUTH, Warden, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA97-144-DKC) Submitted: December 23, 1997 Decided: January 9, 1998 Before WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Albert Curtis Mills, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's orders dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint and denyinghis motion for reconsideration. The district court dismissed Appellant's complaint without prejudice for failure to allege facts showing that his constitutional rights were violated. Because a dismissal without prejudice is not generally appealable, we dismiss the appeal. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 200

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Honoring the victims of the June 25, 1996,

terrorist bombing in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 200

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas on June 25, 1996, a terrorist truck bomb outside

a military housing compound in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia,

killed 19 members of the Armed Forces and wounded

hundreds of others;

Whereas the members of the Armed Forces killed and wounded in the bombing were defending the national security

interests of the United States;
2

•HCON 200 EH

Whereas the defense of United States national interests continues to require the forward deployment of members of

the Armed Forces to other countries;

Whereas the members of the Armed Forces are called upon

to perform duties that place their lives at risk from terrorist elements hostile to the United States;

Whereas global terrorism has demonstrated no respect for the

historic rules of war, no reluctance to strike against innocent and defenseless individuals, and a willingness to engage in tactics against which conventional defenses are

difficult;

Whereas it is the duty of the President and the military chain

of command to take all necessary steps to keep members

of the Armed Forces protected and as safe as the nature

of their mission permits;

Whereas the people of the United States stand with those

who have volunteered to serve their country and grieve at

the loss of those who, to quote Lincoln, ‘‘have given their

last full measure of devotion’’ to the security and wellbeing of the United States;

Whereas those members of the Armed Forces serving in

Saudi Arabia and around the world demonstrate valor

and a faith in the American way of life that reflects honorably not only on themselves but upon the country that

they represent; and

Whereas the military personnel who lost their lives on June

25, 1996, in the bombing in Dhahran died in the honorable service of their Nation and exemplified all that is

best and most virtuous in the American people: Now,

therefore, be it
3

•HCON 200 EH

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),

3 That Congress hereby—

4 (1) recognizes the 19 members of the Armed

5 Forces who died in the terrorist truck bombing in

6 Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, on June 25, 1996, and hon7 ors them for their service and sacrifice;

8 (2) calls upon the Nation to hold fast the mem9 ory of those who died;

10 (3) extends its sympathies to the families of

11 those who died; and

12 (4) assures the members of the Armed Forces

13 serving anywhere in the world that their well-being

14 and interests will at all times be given the highest

15 priority.

Passed the House of Representatives September 24,

1996.

Attest:

Clerk.
```

[115th Congress Public Law 37]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 131 STAT. 854]]

Public Law 115-37
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
   To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
 authorize COPS grantees to use grant funds to hire veterans as career 
   law enforcement officers, and for other purposes. <<NOTE: June 2, 
                           2017 -  [S. 583]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: American Law 
Enforcement Heroes Act of 2017. 42 USC 3711 note.>> 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``American Law Enforcement Heroes Act 
of 2017''.
SEC. 2. PRIORITIZING HIRING AND TRAINING OF VETERANS.

    Section 1701(b)(2) of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 
Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796dd(b)(2)) is amended by inserting ``, 
including by prioritizing the hiring and training of veterans (as 
defined in section 101 of title 38, United States Code)'' after 
``Nation''.

    Approved June 2, 2017.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 583 (H.R. 1428):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 163 (2017):
            May 16, considered and passed Senate.
            May 17, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
#### § 1.642(g)-2 Deductions included.

It is not required that the total deductions, or the total amount of any deduction, to which section 642(g) is applicable be treated in the same way. One deduction or portion of a deduction may be allowed for income tax purposes if the appropriate statement is filed, while another deduction or portion is allowed for estate tax purposes. Section 642(g) has no application to deductions for taxes, interest, business expenses, and other items accrued at the date of a decedent's death so that they are allowable as a deduction under section 2053(a)(3) for estate tax purposes as claims against the estate, and are also allowable under section 691(b) as deductions in respect of a decedent for income tax purposes. However, section 642(g) is applicable to deductions for interest, business expenses, and other items not accrued at the date of the decedent's death so that they are allowable as deductions for estate tax purposes only as administration expenses under section 2053(a)(2). Although deductible under section 2053(a)(3) in determining the value of the taxable estate of a decedent, medical, dental, etc., expenses of a decedent which are paid by the estate of the decedent are not deductible in computing the taxable income of the estate. See section 213(d) and the regulations thereunder for rules relating to the deductibility of such expenses in computing the taxable income of the decedent.
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o
. 1 0

- 2 0 1 9 8 C o n f e r e n c e C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v
. J U A N D E V O R A M O N T E L O N G O , a l s o k n o w n a s J u a n D e v o r a , a l s o k n o w n a s J u a n C a r l o s D e v o r a - M o n t e l o n g o , D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e S o u t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o
. 4 : 0 9

- C R

- 6 2 0

- 1

B e f o r e K I N G , B E N A V I D E S , a n d P R A D O , C i r c u i t J u d g e s
. P E R C U R I A M : * T h e F e d e r a l P u b l i c D e f e n d e r a p p o i n t e d t o r e p r e s e n t J u a n D e v o r a M o n t e l o n g o h a s m o v e d f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w a n d h a s f i l e d a b r i e f i n a c c o r d a n c e

w i t h A n d e r s v
. C a l i f

o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. D e v o r a M o n t e l o n g o h a s n o t f i l e d

a r e s p o n s e
. O u r i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w o f t h e r e c o r d a n d c o u n s e l ’ s b r i e f d i s c l o s e s

n o n o n f r i v o l o u s i s s u e f

o r a p p e a l

. A c c o r d i n g l y , c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n f o r l e a v e t o U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Decem ber 8 , 20 10 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R
. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-20198 Document: 00511316075 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/08/2010N o
. 1 0

- 2 0 1 9 8

w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n ,
a n d t h e A P P E A L I S D I S M I S S E D

. S e e 5 T H C I R

. R

. 4 2

. 2

.

2 Case: 10-20198 Document: 00511316075 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/08/2010
§ 20.6696-1 Claims for credit or refund by tax return preparers or appraisers. ( a ) *In general.* For rules for claims for credit or refund by a tax return preparer who prepared a return or claim for refund for estate tax under chapter 11 of subtitle B of the Internal Revenue Code, or by an appraiser that prepared an appraisal in connection with such a return or claim for refund under section 6695A, the rules under § 1.6696-1 of this chapter will apply.
( b ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section is applicable to returns and claims for refund filed, and advice provided, after December 31, 2008.
[T.D. 9436, 73 FR 78451, Dec. 22, 2008]
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 222 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 222

A resolution to commend the Razorbacks of the University of Arkansas at 
      Fayetteville for having won the 1994 NCAA Men's Basketball 
                             Championship.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 14 (legislative day, June 7), 1994

    Mr. Bumpers (for himself and Mr. Pryor) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
A resolution to commend the Razorbacks of the University of Arkansas at 
      Fayetteville for having won the 1994 NCAA Men's Basketball 
                             Championship.

Whereas the men's basketball team of the University of Arkansas at Fayetteville 
        had an outstanding and successful season;
Whereas Arkansas Razorback Head Coach Nolan Richardson was the recipient of the 
        1994 Naismith Coach of the Year Award;
Whereas Arkansas Razorback Forward Corliss Williamson was named 1994 NCAA Final 
        Four's Most Valuable Player;
Whereas the University of Arkansas and the Arkansas Razorbacks christened the 
        newly erected Bud Walton Arena with their best season to date; and
Whereas the Arkansas Razorbacks handed the Duke Blue Devils a 76-72 defeat, 
        winning the 1994 NCAA men's basketball championship: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the Senate commends the Razorbacks of the University 
of Arkansas at Fayetteville for having won the 1994 National Collegiate 
Athletic Association Men's Basketball Championship.

                                 <all>
```
-----"Richard Ramsdell" <RRamsdell@ebensburgpower.com> wrote: -----

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA From: "Richard Ramsdell" <RRamsdell@ebensburgpower.com>

Date: 07/08/2010 02:36PM cc: "Gary Anderson" <ganders on@TRAINING.rtp.epa.gov> Subject: ICR Extension Request

Plant ID: 05183

Ms. Alicea,

Ebensburg Power Company (EPC) recent ly received an Information Collect ion Request (ICR) that will be used to develop effluent limitation guidelines and standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Industry. EPC has started the proces s of compiling the information requested, but due to extensive amount of information requested, it will take some time to complete all the forms.

EPC respectfully requests a 90 day exte nsion for the submittal; of the data.

If you should have any questions or comments plea se contact me via the contact information below.

Thank you



### Richard A. Ramsdell Plant Engineer Ebensburg Power Company

PO Box 845 

### Ebensburg , PA 15931 

### Tel: (814) 472-1140 Ext. 305 Fax: (814) 472-1143 Email: RRamsdell@ebensburgpower.com Pa g e 1 of 1

8/24/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\TMedle y \Local Settin g s\Tem p \XP g r p wise\4C371982DO

...
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 150 (Thursday, August 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 39314]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18798]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RM06-22-008]

North American Electric Reliability Corporation; Notice of Filing

July 30, 2009.
    Take notice that on June 30, 2009, the North American Electric 
Reliability Corporation, in compliance with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Order No. 706, 122 FERC ] 61,040 
(2008), submitted Violation Severity Levels (``VSLs'') for eight 
Critical Infrastructure Protection (``CIP'') Version 1 Reliability 
Standards, CIP-002-1 through CIP-009-1, approved by the Commission.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
[email protected], or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on August 20, 2009.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-18798 Filed 8-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
Order filed September 18, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-00656-CV

____________

In the Interest of A.L., M.L., and J.Y.R., Children

On Appeal from the 315th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2010-06710J

ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment in a suit in which the termination of 

the parent-child relationship is at issue Appellant's brief was due September 17, 2012. 

No brief has been filed. 

Unless appellant files a brief with the clerk of this court within 10 days of the date 

of this order, the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Bing Yeh, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of
Silicon Storage Technology, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:
5. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
6. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
7. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and
8. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
9. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
10. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 6, 2004



|/s/ Bing Yeh                                  
|----------------------------------------------
|Bing Yeh
President and Chief Executive Officer

---
2013 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d

S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

3-19-2013 

# N e al C r i s pin v

. C ommi s sione r of I n t e r n al R eve n

P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : P r e c e de n t i al

D ock e t N o . 12-2275

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w

. v i l l a no v a

. e du/thir dc ir c uit_2013

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a

U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. I t h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2013 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a

U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w

. v i l l a no v a

. e du

. R e c omme nde d C it a t ion

" N e al C r i sp in v

. C ommi s sione r of I n t e r n al R e v e n " (2013). 2013 D e cisio n s

. P a pe r 1046.
h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w

. v i l l a no v a

. e du/thir dc ir c uit_2013/1046

### PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 12

- 2275

_____________

NEAL CRISPIN, Appellant,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

_______________
On Appeal from the Unit ed States Tax Court

( No. 28980

- 07 ) Judge: Hon. Diane L. Kroupa

_______________
Argued January 8 , 2013

Before: RENDELL, FISHER, and JORDAN

, Circuit

Judges

.

(Filed : March 19, 2013 )

_______________

### 2 George W. Connelly [ARGUED] Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Johnson & Williams
1200 Smith Street 1400 Citicorp Houston, TX 77002 Counsel for Appellant

Gary R. Allen
Tamara W. Ashford
Richard Farber Judith A. Hagley [ARGUED] Gilbert S. Rothenberg United States Department of Justice
Tax Divisio n 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
P.O. Box 502 Washington, DC 20044

_______________

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

_______________

JORDAN, Circuit Judge

.

IT IS NOW ORDERED that the above

- captioned opinion be amended as follows:

Footnote 3 shall now read:

The C ommissioner contends that that step in the CARDS transaction “is predicated on an invalid application of the ... basis provisions of the Internal Revenue Code.” (Appellee’s Br. at 4.)

### 3 Specifically, I.R.C. § 1012 provides that a taxpayer’s basis in propert y is generally equal to the purchase price paid by the taxpayer. That purchase price includes the amount of the seller’s liabilities assumed by the taxpayer as part of the purchase, on the assumption that the taxpayer will eventually repay those liabiliti es. See Comm’r v. Tufts , 461 U.S. 300, 308

- 09 (1983). But in a CARDS transaction, the Commissioner argues, the taxpayer and the foreign borrower agree that the taxpayer will repay only the portion of the loan equal to the amount of currency the taxpayer actually purchases.

/s/ Kent A. Jordan Circuit Judge

DATED: March 19, 2013