alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Journal officiel C 19A/27 j

| | ISSN 1725-2431 |
| --- | --- |
| Journal officiel
  de l'Union européenne | C 19A |
| | |
| Édition de langue française | Communications et informations | 50e année27 janvier 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2431

Journal officiel

de l'Union européenne

C 19A

Édition de langue française

Communications et informations

50e année27 janvier 2007

---

| Numéro d'information | Sommaire | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| 2007/C 019A/01 | AVIS AU LECTEUR | 1 |

Numéro d'information

Sommaire

page

2007/C 019A/01

AVIS AU LECTEUR

1

| | V   Avis |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCÉDURES ADMINISTRATIVES |
| | Office européen de sélection du personnel (EPSO) |
| 2007/C 019A/02 | Listes de réserve — Concours général EPSO/AD/41/05 — Juristes linguistes (AD7) de langue française (FR) | 3 |

V   Avis

PROCÉDURES ADMINISTRATIVES

Office européen de sélection du personnel (EPSO)

2007/C 019A/02

Listes de réserve — Concours général EPSO/AD/41/05 — Juristes linguistes (AD7) de langue française (FR)

3

| FR | |
| --- | --- |

FR

---

27.1.2007

| 27.1.2007 | FR | Journal officiel de l'Union européenne | CA 19/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

FR

Journal officiel de l'Union européenne

CA 19/1

---

AVIS AU LECTEUR

Image

---

V Avis

PROCÉDURES ADMINISTRATIVES

Office européen de sélection du personnel (EPSO)

| 27.1.2007 | FR | Journal officiel de l'Union européenne | CA 19/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2007

FR

Journal officiel de l'Union européenne

CA 19/3

---

LISTES DE RÉSERVE
   (1)

CONCOURS GÉNÉRAL EPSO/AD/41/05

JURISTES LINGUISTES (AD7) DE LANGUE FRANÇAISE (FR)

(2007/C 19 A/01)

Groupe de mérite 1

| BARBIER de la SERRE | Éric |
| --- | --- |
| BONTINCK | Gaëlle |
| de SCHIETERE de LOPHEM | Lucie |
| DOLT | Frédéric |
| HEBETTE | Martine |
| LAMBERT | Frédérique |
| PANAYOTOPOULOS | Nicolas |
| SALOU | Marianne |
| SEGNANA | Olivier |
| VAN WYMEERSCH | Laurence |
| VERNIERI | Alexis |
| WALLERAND | Florence |

BARBIER de la SERRE

Éric

BONTINCK

Gaëlle

de SCHIETERE de LOPHEM

Lucie

DOLT

Frédéric

HEBETTE

Martine

LAMBERT

Frédérique

PANAYOTOPOULOS

Nicolas

SALOU

Marianne

SEGNANA

Olivier

VAN WYMEERSCH

Laurence

VERNIERI

Alexis

WALLERAND

Florence

Groupe de mérite 2

| BARROIS | Frédéric |
| --- | --- |
| BOHLER | Arnaud |
| GERKENS | Caroline |
| LEMERCIER | Martine |
| MANIAKI-GRIVA | Alexia |
| MORDANT | Véronique |
| NOYON | Olivier |
| PELLERIN | Caroline |
| PIAGUET | Carine |
| ZAREMBA | Emilia |
| ZEIPPEN | Cathleen |

BARROIS

Frédéric

BOHLER

Arnaud

GERKENS

Caroline

LEMERCIER

Martine

MANIAKI-GRIVA

Alexia

MORDANT

Véronique

NOYON

Olivier

PELLERIN

Caroline

PIAGUET

Carine

ZAREMBA

Emilia

ZEIPPEN

Cathleen

Groupe de mérite 3

| CLAVIER | Dominique |
| --- | --- |
| KREMER | François-Xavier |
| PEERE | Véronique |
| PETREQUIN | Sophie |
| QUINTART | Laurent |
| ZENOU | Raphaël |

CLAVIER

Dominique

KREMER

François-Xavier

PEERE

Véronique

PETREQUIN

Sophie

QUINTART

Laurent

ZENOU

Raphaël

La validité des listes expirera le 31 décembre 2007 et pourra être prorogée.

---

(1)  À la demande expresse d'un lauréat, son nom n'est pas publié.

---
2004 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

6-2-2004

USA v. Bentley

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 03-1935

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2004 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"USA v. Bentley" (2004). 2004 Decisions. Paper 631.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004/631
*The Honorable Arthur L. Alarcón, Senior Judge, United States Court of Appeals

for the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation.

NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

____________

No. 03-1935

____________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

TYRONE BENTLEY,

a/k/a TYRONE HARRIS

 Tyrone Bentley,

 Appellant

____________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. No. 97-cr-00445)

District Judge: The Honorable Stewart Dalzell

____________

Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

May 28, 2004

Before: SCIRICA, Chief Judge, FISHER and ALARCÓN,* Circuit Judges.

(Filed June 2, 2004)

____________

OPINION OF THE COURT

____________
2

FISHER, Circuit Judge.

Tyrone Bentley claims, for the first time on this appeal, that he should not have

received a two-level upward adjustment in his offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3C1.2. 

The standard of review is plain error. Fed. R. Crim. P. 52(b); United States v. Torres, 209

F.3d 308, 313 (3d Cir. 2000).

The government concedes that the sentencing enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G.

§ 3C1.2 should not have been applied in this case, as the defendant was fleeing from

armored car employees, not law enforcement officials.

The government agrees that the erroneous application of § 3C1.2 warrants a

remand to permit resentencing. We will therefore vacate the judgment of sentence in this

case and remand the matter for resentencing.

________________________
#### § 1.936-9T Source of qualified possession source investment income (temporary). [Reserved]
H

î

"

H

î"

H

î "

H î "

H

î"

H

H

H î

î

î "

"

"

H

" î

H" î

H î "

?

?

?

200

250

150

200

150

150

200

150

150

200

200

200

200

150

200

200

200

200

200

150

FM-681

FM-1017 LA REFORMA RD

HIDALGO

CO

STARR

CO

HIDALGO

CO

STARR

CO

Puerto Rico

Cipres

La Reforma

Noche

Buena Windmill

La Rosita Windmill

Bella Vista

Windmill

El Chapote Windmill

El Perro

Windmill

Alaniz

Windmill

Los Angeles Windmill

Christalinas

Windmill

El Nuevo Windmill

ElToro

Windmill

ElTorero Windmill

Florida Windmill

Hargrove Windmill

La Pureta Windmill

El Javalin Windmill

Las

Margaritas Windmill

El Nuevo Windmill

Gudalupe

Toreros Cem

Santa

Guadalupe Cem

Santa

Monica Cem

Santa

Rita Cem

Linn

NW

Santa

Elena Hartland

McAllen

Ranch

La

Reforma

Bentsen

Ranch

Linn

Siding

Santa

Elena SE

San

Isidro

16

E 74

29

42'

40'

30"

060

42'

000

22'

55

790

29

37'

29

66

29

67

22'

52

54

40'

26°

30"

5

47

FEET

20'

45'

29

000m

20'

29

5

000m 5

55

29

63

46

5

5 5

56

58

49

69 5

26°

29

29

47

52

48

29

63

5

5

N

E

30"

000

16

5

26°

30"

5 5

29

51

67 74

29

17'

5

53

30"

50

5

29

000

29

30"

29

29

29

030 5

30"

760

FEET

65

56

000m

15'

71 45'

000

N

5

5 5

29

98°

49

26° 70

FEET

57

68

29

17'

64

69

29

72

50

51

98°

46

48

98°

70

73

29

29

29

65 5

54

FEET

29

5

1

57

5

15'

5

71

29

53

1

72

37'

30"

000m

66

29

68 98°

58

TEXAS

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

LA REFORMA QUADRANGLE

TEXAS

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

LA REFORMA, TX

2012

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

WX Interstate Route /. US Route H State Route

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Imagery..................................................NAIP, April 2010

Roads..............................................©2006-2012 TomTom

Names..........................................................GNIS, 2012

Hydrography....................National Hydrography Dataset, 2010

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2008

Boundaries....................Census, IBWC, IBC, USGS, 1972 - 2012

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 14R

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Texas Coordinate System of 1983 (south zone)

This map was produced to conform with the

National Geospatial Program US Topo Product Standard, 2011.

A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.6.7

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0

MILES

1

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

NQ

14R

×

Ù

MN

GN

UTM GRID AND 2012 MAGNETIC NORTH

DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 18 ́

5 MILS

4° 49 ́

86 MILS
Note to Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0837

At 10 a.m. on December 9, 2010, at 1310 L Street, Washington, D.C., EPA 

representatives Ragan Tate (OGC), John Schakenbach (OAR), and Bob Vollaro (OAR)

met with Lauren Freeman of Hunton & Williams representing the Utility Air Regulatory

Group (UARG) and Lisa Jaeger of Bracewell & Giuliani LLP representing Air Liquide in 

settlement discussions related to the Petition for Review filed by UARG, and the Petition 

for Review and Petition for Reconsideration filed by Air Liquide relating to January 24, 

2008 amendments to the Protocol Gas Verification Program and Minimum Competency

Requirements for Air Emission Testing provisions of 40 CFR Part 75.
----

Euro exchange rates (1)

21 December 2006

(2006/C 316/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

----
213 W. Wiygul Street • Fulton, MS 38843 • Office 662-862-4929 • Fax 662-862-9817
April26, 2012

DennisDeVany Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 Re: Tupelo Regional Airport (TUP) DocketDOT-OST-2009-0305 DearMr. DeVany: N .1>
N ro

I am writing in support ofSilver Airways' proposal to provide commercial air service to Tupelo Regional Airport. Citizens from Fulton depend on the Tupelo Regional Airport for their air service. It is very important to our local economy for air service to continue in and out of Tupelo. We believe Silver Airways' interline ticketing and baggage agreements with Delta Airlines make this option very attractive to our citizens. In ·addition the 30 to 50 seat aircraft are much more desirable that the 8 seat aircraft offered by 

### Air Choice One. We are excited about this chance to return to profitability. Thank youfor considering ourcitizensin yourdeliberations. Sincerely,

# ~~ Paul Walker Mayor

PAUL WALKER Mayor
KEVIN !+!OLAN

At-Large HAYWARD WILSON Ward/ LISA RUSSELL City Clerk ALDERMEN: MIKE NANNEY Ward// RAY O'NEAL Attorney LORI BASHAM Prosecuting Attorney
JOEY STEELE

Ward/II BARRY CHILDERS Ward IV
II; II 24580 Silver Cloud Court**~ni!.!;~~~ff?** AI,**POfluu~n** Controf DI'tricf I Monterey. CA 93940 •

" Serving Monterey, San Benito and Santa Cruz Counties I PHONE: (831) 647-9411 • FAX: (831) 647-8501 II -- II I July 28,2010 Mr. Jared Blumenfeld Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 9

75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 I SUBJECT: IMPLEME1TATION OF GREENHOUSE GAS**T~ILORfNG** RULE Dear Administrator Blumenfeld: I As requested in the Final**Gr~enhouse** Gas Tailoring Rule, the konteiey Bay Unified Air Pollution Control District is informing EPA Region 9 on rule**change~** necessary to implement the Tailoring**Rul~** Greenhouse Gas (GHG) provisidns. II • The District's New Source Jeview and Prevention of Significabt De1brioration rule (Rule 207) contains language that**~llows** us to implement the**Tailori~g** Rul:e GHG provisions. Therefore, no changes to Rule 207 are necessary to implement ithe Tailoring Rule. The District's Title V rule (Jule 218) does not have the flexibJity**n~Lssary** to implement

the Tailoring Rule GHG**pro~isions.** Therefore, the District wilI be ptoposing revisions to the definition of Major**Sour~e** in Rule 218 to mirror the Tailoring RJle. I II Should you have any questid1ns relative to this matter Ericksen or Mike Sewell of tny staff.

, you rna

II contact e I

' ither Lance II Sincerely, II j' ichard**Sted~1** Air Pollution Control Officer 'I Monterey Bay Unified APCD Rkho" A.**"""m~,** Air PoIfu",," Coo"'" 0#11
----

----

I Informacija

Komisija

----

Komisijos komunikatas, parengtas įgyvendinant 1988 m. gruodžio 21 d. Tarybos direktyvą 89/106/EEB dėl valstybių narių įstatymų ir kitų teisės aktų, susijusių su statybos produktais, derinimo

(tekstas svarbus EEE)

(Darniųjų standartų pavadinimų ir nuorodinių žymenų skelbimas pagal direktyvą)

(2006/C 304/01)

Pastaba:

Daugiau informacijos apie darniuosius standartus rasite internete adresu:

http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/newapproach/standardization/harmstds/

----

(1)

(2)  Standartų koegzistencijos laikotarpio pabaigos data sutampa su paskelbimu apie prieštaraujančių šiam darniajam standartui nacionalinių techninių specifikacijų galių netekimu, po kurio atitikties nustatymo prielaidos grindžiamos darniosiomis Europos techninėmis specifikacijomis (darniuoju standartu ar Europos techniniu liudijimu).

(3)  Jei daromi pakeitimai, pamatinis standartas yra EN CCCCC: YYYY, jo ankstesni pakeitimai, jei jų buvo, ir naujasis cituojamas pakeitimas.

(4)OL L 204, 1998 7 21, p. 37.

(5)OL L 217, 1998 8 5, p. 18.

----
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Groundwater quality andwater-well characteristics in the Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma JurisdictionalArea, central Oklahoma, 1948-2011**
 
Report | Plate 1 | Plate 2
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.76:2012-1255
Item Number:0624-H (online)
CGP systemNumber:000908267
 
December 13, 2017
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ASBEL PEREZ VICIEDO and CARLOS RENDA
, Appellant s ,

v.

CREAL DALLAS, LLC
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 3812

[ June 28, 2018 ]

Appeal of a non

- final order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Michael L. Gates , Judge; L.T. Case No.

16

- 12591CACE(12)

.

Marlon E. Bryan of Bryan Law, Fort Lauderdale, (withdrawn as counsel after filing brief), and Asbel Perez Viciedo and Carlos Renda, West Palm Beach, pro se.

Jonath an Feldman of Perlman, Bajandas, Yevoli & Albright, P.L., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS
, M AY and D AMOORGIAN
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 43703

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

QUENTIN C. PADILLA,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 617

Filed: July 28, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Timothy Hansen, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and aggregate unified sentence of twenty-five years, with 

a minimum period of confinement of seven years, for two counts of aggravated 

assault on certain law enforcement personnel, one count of possession of 

methamphetamine, one count of felony eluding a police officer, and one count of 

unlawful possession of a firearm, affirmed.

Eric D. Fredericksen, Interim State Appellate Public Defender; Andrea W. 

Reynolds, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Judge; GRATTON, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Quentin C. Padilla pled guilty to two counts of aggravated assault on certain law 

enforcement personnel, Idaho Code § 18-915(1), 18-905; one count of possession of 

methamphetamine, I.C. § 37-2732(c); one count of felony eluding a police officer, I.C. § 49-

1404(2)(a); and one count of unlawful possession of a firearm, I.C. § 18-3316. In exchange for 

the guilty plea, additional charges were dismissed. The district court imposed consecutive 

sentences of five years, with two years determinate, for each count of aggravated assault on 
2

certain law enforcement personnel; five years indeterminate for possession of methamphetamine; 

five years, with three years determinate, for felony eluding a police officer; and five years 

indeterminate for unlawful possession of a firearm, resulting in an aggregate unified sentence of 

twenty-five years, with a minimum period of confinement of seven years. Padilla appeals, 

contending that his aggregate sentence is excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Padilla’s judgment of conviction and aggregate sentence are affirmed.
SCPW-20-0000433

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

MARSHALL MARTINEZ, Petitioner,

vs.

M. FRINK, Warden, Respondent.

 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(CR. NO. 2PC000007716(1))

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Wilson, JJ.,

and Circuit Judge Johnson, assigned by reason of vacancy)

Upon consideration of petitioner Marshall Martinez’s

petition for writ of habeas corpus, filed on June 29, 2020, the

documents attached thereto and submitted in support thereof, and

the record, it appears that petitioner presents no special reason

for this court to invoke its jurisdiction and has alternative

means to seek relief. See Oili v. Chang, 54 Haw. 411, 412, 557

P.2d 787, 788 (1976). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of

habeas corpus is denied.

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-20-0000433

13-JUL-2020

08:53 AM
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the

appellate court shall process the petition for writ of habeas

corpus without payment of the filing fee.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, July 13, 2020.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Ronald G. Johnson

2
C.J. 

Pickering 

J. 

priority over a first security interest and that the association may 

nonjudicially foreclose on that lien. 

It is so ORDERED. 

f3tkos SI; , 

Hardesty 

fi3/4r7 Parraguirre 

, J. 

Douglas 

Saitta 

cc: Law Office of Richard L. Tobler, Ltd. 

Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP/Las Vegas 

Clerk, United States District Court for the District of Nevada 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 2 

NEVADA 

J. 

J. 

(0) 1947A
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-10849 Conference Calendar

EDWARD OSWALT Plaintiff-Appellant

v. KELLY VANDYGRIFF; SHAWN VANDYGRIFF; ABERNATHY FIRE CHIEF; ORIS J CECIL, Ex-Fire Marshal; SANTOS MARTINEZ; CAROLYN PURSLEY, State Fire Marshal; JAMES L WHARTON, Attorney for Travelers Lloyds and Hubbard Insurance Agency; DENNIS BELKNAP; CINDY RUNNELS; GARY MORMINO & ASSOCIATES, Travelers Lloyds of Texas Defendants-Appellees
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:07-CV-103
Before PRADO, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Edward Oswalt, Texas prisoner # 1421535, was convicted of arson and sentenced to five years in prison. Oswalt appeals the district court’s dismissal ofhis civil rights complaint, in which he claimed, inter alia, that the defendants had him falsely charged with arson so that his insurance company would not United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D April 15, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-10849

2 have to pay for the fire damage to his home. Oswalt also alleged that the defendants conspired to interfere with his civil rights, deprived him of his constitutional right to his home, and denied him equal protection under the law. Os walt sought monetary damages in the amount of 16 million dollars. The district court dismissed Oswalt’s complaint as frivolous and for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). Oswalt has filed a one-page appellate briefwith this court, asserting that the district court erred in dismissing his complaint. Oswalt has not, however, analyzed the district court’s merit-based dismissal ofhisclaims. Thus, Oswalt’s claims are deemed abandoned. SeeYohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). Oswalt’s brief fails to raise any issue of arguable merit. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Accordingly, we dismiss his appeal
as frivolous. See 5 TH C IR
. R. 42.2. The district court's dismissal of Oswalt’s suit
as frivolous and for failure to state a claim pursuant to § 1915(e)(2)(B) and § 1915A(b)(1) and this court's dismissal ofthis appeal as frivolous both count as strikesfor purposes of28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). SeeAdepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). Oswalt is cautioned that if he accumulates three strikes under § 1915(g), he will not be able to proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g). APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 20

- 1168 V

UNPUBLISHED

DONNA E. MAESTAS

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: November 9, 2021

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

Vaccine Rule 21(a); Order

Concluding Proceedings

Robert P. Goodwin, Walsh Roberts & Grace, Buffalo, NY , for P etitioner.

Claudia Barnes Gangi

, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for R espondent.

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS 1

O n October 26, 2021

, Petitioner filed a joint stipulation to voluntarily dismiss this

case. Accordingly, pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a), the a bove

- captione d case is here by

dismissed without prejudice . The Clerk of the Court is hereby instructed that a

judgment shall not enter in the instant case pursuant to Vaccine Rule 2 1(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master

1 Because this unpublished order contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

- Government Act

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government

Services). This means the order will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,

the disclosure of whic h would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that

the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.