alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.21



 Exhibit 10.21 
  
 Highland Hospitality Corporation 
 Compensation for Non-Employee Directors 
  
 For fiscal year 2006, we paid the Chairman of our Board of Directors an annual fee of $250,000. We paid each of our directors (other than Messrs.
Wardinski and Francis) who did not serve as the chairman of one of our committees a director’s fee of $20,000. We paid each director who served as a committee chairman, other than our Audit Committee chairman, a director’s fee of $25,000.
The director who served as our Audit Committee chairman was paid a director’s fee of $30,000. We paid each director, other than our Chairman and Mr. Francis, an additional $1,500 fee per Board or committee meeting attended (or $500 per
telephonic meeting), except that committee chairpersons were paid $2,500 per committee meeting attended. Directors who are officers or employees receive no additional compensation as directors. In addition, we reimburse all directors for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with their services on the Board. 
  
 Each of our non-employee directors serving at the time of our 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, other than Mr. Wardinski, received a grant of 2,000 vested shares of common stock at the time of the meeting of
the Board immediately following the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. 
  
 In January 2007, the Compensation Policy Committee and Board of Directors increased certain elements of director compensation for fiscal year 2007. For fiscal year 2007, we will pay each of our directors (other than Messrs. Wardinski and
Francis) who does not serve as the chairman of one of our committees a director’s fee of $30,000. We will continue to pay the Chairman of our Board of Directors an annual fee of $250,000. The director who serves as our Audit Committee chairman
will be paid a director’s fee of $42,000. The director who serves as our Compensation Policy Committee chairman will be paid a director’s fee of $37,500. The director who serves as our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee chairman
will be paid a director’s fee of $36,000. We will continue to pay each director, other than our Chairman and Mr. Francis, an additional $1,500 fee per Board or committee meeting attended (or $500 per telephonic meeting), except that
committee chairpersons will be paid $2,500 per committee meeting attended. In addition, each of our non-employee directors serving at the time of our 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders will receive a grant of 2,000 vested shares of common stock at
the time of the meeting of the Board immediately following the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Finally, we granted Mr. Wardinski 100,000 shares of restricted stock, which will vest in equal tranches over four years, conditioned on continued
service to the Company.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 150 (Thursday, August 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 39339]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18743]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent Decree

    In accordance with Departmental Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that a proposed Consent Decree in United States v. Sierra 
Properties I, LLC, Civil No. 8:09 CV-1400-T, was lodged with the United 
States District Court for the Middle District of Florida on July 28, 
2009.
    This proposed Consent Decree concerns a complaint filed by the 
United States against Sierra Properties I, LLC, pursuant to Sections 
301(a) and 404(s) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1311(a), 1344(s) to 
obtain injunctive relief and impose civil penalties against the 
Defendant for violating the Clean Water Act by discharging fill 
material in violation of a permit into waters of the United States. The 
proposed Consent Decree resolves these allegations by requiring the 
Defendant to pay a civil penalty. The Department of Justice will accept 
written comments relating to this proposed Consent Decree for thirty 
(30) days from the date of publication of this Notice. Please address 
comments to E. Kenneth Stegeby, United States Attorney's Office, Middle 
District of Florida, 400 North Tampa Street, Suite 3200, Tampa, Florida 
33602 and refer to United States v. Sierra Properties I, LLC, Civil No. 
8:09 CV-1400-T.
    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Clerk's Office, 
Sam M. Gibbons United States Courthouse, 2nd Floor, 801 North Florida 
Avenue, Tampa, Florida 33603. In addition, the proposed Consent Decree 
may be viewed at http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_Decrees.html.

Maureen M. Katz,
Assistant Section Chief, Environment & Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. E9-18743 Filed 8-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE; P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: N.M.J., A MINOR

PETITION OF: B.P.

:

:

:

:

:

No. 41 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 20th day of April, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
#### Anthony Charles McGAHA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. S.K. YOUNG, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 02-6485.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 30, 2002.

Decided June 7, 2002.

Anthony Charles McGaha, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Charles McGaha seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 *&*Supp.2001) and denying reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and the dis*625triet court’s opinions and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *See McGaha v. Young,*No. CA-01-238-3 (E.D. Va. Mar. 5 *&*Mar. 15, 2002). We also deny McGaha leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**  D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2015, byand among Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Master Servicer and initial Excluded Special Servicer,LNR Partners, LLC as General Special Servicer, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC,as Trust Advisor, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, and WellsFargo Bank National Association as Certificate Administrator, CertificateRegistrar, Authenticating Agent and Custodian with respect to CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates Sereis 2015-C26 (the“Agreement”).  Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 13.9 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 through December31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per theAgreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under this Agreement in all material respects  throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President 

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
§ 1.501(r)-7 Effective/applicability dates. ( a ) *Effective/applicability date.* The rules of §§ 1.501(r)-1 through 1.501(r)-6 apply to taxable years beginning after December 29, 2015.
( b ) *Reasonable interpretation for taxable years beginning on or before* December 29, 2015. For taxable years beginning on or before December 29, 2015, a hospital facility may rely on a reasonable, good faith interpretation of section 501(r). A hospital facility will be deemed to have operated in accordance with a reasonable, good faith interpretation of section 501(r) if it has complied with the provisions of the proposed or final regulations under section 501(r) (REG-130266-11 and/or REG-106499-12). Accordingly, a hospital facility may rely on § 1.501(r)-3 of the proposed or final regulations, or another reasonable interpretation of section 501(r)(3), for any CHNA conducted or implementation strategy adopted before the first day of the hospital organization's first taxable year beginning after December 29, 2015.
[T.D. 9708, 79 FR 78998, Dec. 31, 2014]
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-30260 Summary Calendar

LEN EDWIN DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus CHARLES C. FOTI, JR., Sheriff; BILLY SHORT, Warden, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 96-CV-2898-D

- - - - - - - - - - October 22, 1998 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Len Edwin Davis, #00004, has filed an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal, following the district court’s certification that an appeal would be frivolous. Davis has failed to challenge specifically the district court’s finding that his appeal was not taken in good faith and was legally frivolous. Although this court liberally construes pro
se briefs, see Haines v. Kerner , 404 U.S. 519, 520-21 (1972), theNo. 98-30260 -2- court requires arguments to be briefed in order to be preserved.

Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993). Thus, the only appealable issue -- the district court’s certification of the appeal as frivolous -- has been abandoned. See id
. Davis’ request for IFP status is DENIED, and his appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2; Baugh v. Taylor , 117 F.3d 197, 202 n.24 (5th Cir. 1997). DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 223 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 223

 To refer S. 2188 entitled ``A bill for the relief of the Pottawatomi 
   Nation in Canada for the proportionate share of tribal funds and 
annuities under treaties between the Pottawatomi Nation and the United 
  States, and for other purposes'', to the Chief Judge of the United 
        States Court of Federal Claims for a report on the bill.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 14 (legislative day, June 7), 1994

    Mr. Inouye (for himself and Mr. Simon) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To refer S. 2188 entitled ``A bill for the relief of the Pottawatomi 
   Nation in Canada for the proportionate share of tribal funds and 
annuities under treaties between the Pottawatomi Nation and the United 
  States, and for other purposes'', to the Chief Judge of the United 
        States Court of Federal Claims for a report on the bill.

    Resolved, That S. 2188 entitled ``A bill for the relief of the 
Pottawatomi Nation in Canada for the proportionate share of tribal 
funds and annuities under treaties between the Pottawatomi Nation and 
the United States, and for other purposes'', now pending in the Senate, 
together with all accompanying papers, is referred to the Chief Judge 
of the United States Court of Federal Claims. The Chief Judge shall 
proceed according to the provisions of sections 1492 and 2509 of title 
28, United States Code, and report back to the Senate, at the earliest 
practicable date, providing such findings of fact and conclusions that 
are sufficient to inform the Congress of--
            (1) whether the claims against the United States of the 
        Pottawatomi Nation in Canada that would have been compensable 
        under the Indian Claims Commission Act (25 U.S.C. 70 et seq.) 
        but for the residence of the Pottawatomi Nation in Canada and 
        outside of the territorial limits of the United States are 
        legal or equitable in nature;
            (2) the amount of damages (if any) that the Pottawatomi 
        Nation in Canada would have been entitled to receive under such 
        Act but for the residence of the Pottawatomi Nation in Canada 
        and outside of the territorial limits of the United States that 
        is payable to the Pottawatomi Nation in Canada in accordance 
        with section 1(1) of S. 2188; and
            (3) the amount of interest that is payable on the amount 
        referred to in paragraph (2) in accordance with section 1(2) of 
        S. 2188, calculated at a rate of 5 percent per year.

                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.6081-2 Automatic extension of time for filing an information return with respect to certain foreign trusts. ( a ) *In general.* A trust required to file a return on Form 3520-A, “Annual Information Return of Foreign Trust with a U.S. Owner,” will be allowed an automatic 6-month extension of time to file the return after the date prescribed for filing the return if the trust files an application under this section in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) *Requirements.* To satisfy this paragraph (b), a trust must— ( 1 ) Submit a complete application on Form 7004, “Application for Automatic Extension of Time to File Certain Business Income Tax, Information, and Other Returns,” or in any other manner prescribed by the Commissioner; and
( 2 ) File the application on or before the date prescribed for filing the return with the Internal Revenue Service office designated in the application's instructions.
( c ) *Termination of automatic extension.* The Commissioner may terminate an automatic extension at any time by mailing to the trust a notice of termination at least 10 days prior to the termination date designated in such notice. The Commissioner must mail the notice of termination to the address shown on the Form 7004 or to the trust's last known address. For further guidance regarding the definition of last known address, see § 301.6212-2 of this chapter.
( d ) *Penalties.* See section 6677 for failure to file information returns with respect to certain foreign trusts.
( e ) *Effective/applicability dates.* This section is applicable for applications for an automatic extension of time to file an information return with respect to certain foreign trusts listed in paragraph (a) of this section filed after July 1, 2008.
[T.D. 9407, 73 FR 37371, July 1, 2008] place for filing returns or other documents
RE: Interagency revisions to EPA proposed Biogenic emissions languageKymn, Christine J.to:Raj Rao, Lisa Sutton, Anna Wood08/04/2010 10:02 AM1 attachmentInteragency edits3_Proposed language, biogenic GHG sources, EPA NPRMs, Actions to Ensure Authority to Issue Permits under thePSD Program to Sources of GHG Emissions.dAll,Attached please find proposed edits to the FIP proposal (inserting one sentence in lieu of the earlier LDVRsentence and mirroring the first paragraph of the agreed upon SIP proposal language). The SIP proposallanguage is resolved at this stage. Please let me know EPA's response.Thanks,Christine-----Original Message-----From: Rao.Raj@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Rao.Raj@epamail.epa.gov]Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 2:57 PMTo: Kymn, Christine J.Subject: Re: Interagency revisions to EPA proposed Biogenic emissions languageHi Christine,Thanks for these comments. We are reviewing and considering the edits and will get back to you asap.rajRaj Rao, P.E.Group Leader, NSRGOAQPS/AQPD(MD- C504-03)109 TW Alexander DriveRTP, NC 27709919-541-5344919-541-5509 faxNote: Positions or views expressed here do not represent official EPA policy. Interagency deliberative andConfidential.From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>To: Raj Rao/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA,Lisa Sutton/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Anna Wood/DC/USEPA/US@EPADate: 08/03/2010 12:03 PMSubject: Interagency revisions to EPA proposed Biogenic emissions languageRaj, Lisa, Anna,Greetings. Attached please find proposed edits to EPA’s suggested biogenic GHG language. Let’s chatsometime today about these if possible.Thanks,Christine202.395.4638(See attached file: Interagency edits1_Proposed language, biogenic GHG sources, EPA NPRMs,Actions to Ensure Authority to Issue Permits under the PSD Program to Sources of GHG Emissions.docx)(Seeattached file: Interagency edits2_Proposed language, biogenic GHG sources, EPA NPRMs, Actions to EnsureAuthority to Issue Permits under the PSD Program to Sources of GHG Emissions.docx)
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 211 (Friday, October 31, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 64721-64722]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25725]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 271

[EPA-R06-RCRA-2014-0366; FRL-9918-55-Region-6]

Arkansas: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management 
Program Revisions

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

ACTION: Proposed rule

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The State of Arkansas has applied to EPA for Final 
authorization of the changes to its hazardous waste program under the 
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). EPA proposes to grant 
Final authorization to the State of Arkansas. In the ``Rules and 
Regulations'' section of this Federal Register, EPA is authorizing the 
changes by an immediate final rule. EPA did not make a proposal prior 
to the direct final rule because we believe this action is not 
controversial and do not expect comments that oppose it. We have 
explained the reasons for this authorization in the preamble to the 
direct final rule. Unless we get written comments which oppose this 
authorization during the comment period, the direct final rule will 
become effective on the date it establishes, and we will not take 
further action on this proposal. If we receive comments that oppose 
this action, we will withdraw

[[Page 64722]]

the direct final rule and it will not take effect. We will then respond 
to public comments in a later final rule based on this proposal. You 
may not have another opportunity for comment. If you want to comment on 
this action, you must do so at this time.

DATES: Send your written comments by December 1, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Alima Patterson, Region 6, Regional 
Authorization Coordinator, (6PD-O), Multimedia Planning and Permitting 
Division, at the address shown below. You can examine copies of the 
materials submitted by the State of Arkansas during normal business 
hours at the following locations: Arkansas Department of Environmental 
Quality, 8101 Interstate 30, Little Rock, Arkansas 72219-8913, (501) 
682-0876, and EPA, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-
2733, phone number (214) 665-8533 ; or Comments may also be submitted 
electronically or through hand delivery/courier; please follow the 
detailed instructions in the ADDRESSES section of the direct final rule 
which is located in the Rules section of this Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alima Patterson (214) 665-8533.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For additional information, please see the 
direct final rule published in the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of 
this Federal Register.

    Dated: August 22, 2014.
Samuel Coleman,
Acting Regional Administrator Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2014-25725 Filed 10-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
Exhibit
32.02








CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


REQUIRED
BY RULE 13a-14(b) or RULE 15d-14(b)


AND
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


OF
2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Williams Controls, Inc (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Dennis E. Bunday, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.








/s/ DENNIS E.
BUNDAY


Dennis E.
Bunday


Chief
Financial Officer


Williams
Controls, Inc.


May 6,
2009