alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON , D.C. 20460

OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
Memorandum Subject: Summary ofStakeholder Meetings From: John Bradfield To: Dockets EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-6002, EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0603, and EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0495 This memorandum summarizes meetings held with stakeholders in the month ofMay, 2015 On May 14, Clean Air Markets Division Director Reid Harvey and Sector Policy and Programs Division Associate Director Kevin Culligan metwiththe Edison electric Institute. EPA generally answered basic questions aboutthe clean power plan proposal forexisting sources. On May21, Sector Policy and Programs Division Associate Director Kevin Culligan metwith Marilyn Brown ofthe Georgia Tech School of Public Policy. Meeting Materialsattached. EPA generally answered basic questions aboutthe clean power plan proposal forexisting sources.

Internet Address (URL) • http: //www.epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper
##### 



Exhibit 11
 POTASH CORPORATION OF SASKATCHEWAN INC.
COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31
 2007
    
    
    2006A Net income as reported, Canadian GAAP ($ millions)
    
    
    198.0
    
    
    
    125.5B Items adjusting net income ($ millions)
    
    
    2.2
    
    
    
    1.8C Net income, US GAAP ($ millions)
    
    
    200.2
    
    
    
    127.3D Weighted average number of shares outstanding
    
    
    104,965,000
    
    
    
    103,641,000E Net additional shares issuable for diluted earnings per share calculation (Canadian GAAP)
    
    
    2,293,000
    
    
    
    2,184,000F Net additional shares issuable for diluted earnings per share calculation (US GAAP)
    
    
    2,293,000
    
    
    
    2,184,000CANADIAN GAAP
($)Basic earnings per share (A/D)
    
    
    1.89
    
    
    
    1.21Diluted earnings per share (A/(D+E))
    
    
    1.85
    
    
    
    1.19UNITED STATES
GAAP ($)Basic earnings per share (C/D)
    
    
    1.91
    
    
    
    1.23Diluted earnings per share (C/(D+F))
    
    
    1.87
    
    
    
    1.20
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 38 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 38

 Authorizing the use of the Capitol grounds for the Greater Washington 
                            Soap Box Derby.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 1995

  Mr. Hoyer (for himself and Mrs. Morella, Mr. Wynn, Ms. Norton, Mr. 
  Wolf, and Mr. Moran) submitted the following concurrent resolution; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Authorizing the use of the Capitol grounds for the Greater Washington 
                            Soap Box Derby.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF SOAP BOX DERBY RACES ON CAPITOL GROUNDS.

    The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby Association (hereinafter in 
this resolution referred to as the ``Association'') shall be permitted 
to sponsor a public event, soap box derby races, on the Capitol grounds 
on July 15, 1995, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate may jointly 
designate.

SEC. 2. CONDITIONS.

    The event to be carried out under this resolution shall be free of 
admission charge to the public and arranged not to interfere with the 
needs of Congress, under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board; except that the 
Association shall assume full responsibility for all expenses and 
liabilities incident to all activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.

    For the purposes of this resolution, the Association is authorized 
to erect upon the Capitol grounds, subject to the approval of the 
Architect of the Capitol, such stage, sound amplification devices, and 
other related structures and equipment as may be required for the event 
to be carried out under this resolution.

SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

    The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board are 
authorized to make any such additional arrangements that may be 
required to carry out the event under this resolution.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 289 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 289

  To authorize the President of the Senate to administer the oath of 
          office to the Honorable Fred Thompson of Tennessee.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            December 1 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

 Mr. Dole submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  To authorize the President of the Senate to administer the oath of 
          office to the Honorable Fred Thompson of Tennessee.

    Resolved, That the President of the Senate be, and he is hereby, 
authorized to administer the oath of office to the Honorable Fred 
Thompson of Tennessee in the Senate Chamber on Friday, December 9, 
1994, and that the said oath, when administered as herein authorized, 
shall be accepted and received by the Senate as the oath of office of 
the said Fred Thompson.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Marilyn Kelly

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

July 19, 2006 

l0712 

Order 

 

July 19, 2006 

129688 

J. W. HOBBS CORPORATION, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 129688 

 COA: 254069 

Ct of Claims: 02-000166-MT 

REVENUE DIVISION, DEPARTMENT 

OF TREASURY, STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 1, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

 CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal.
Seventh Amendment to the 2001 Restatement of Executive Supplemental Savings Plan




 Exhibit 10.33 
 SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO 
 THE 2001 RESTATEMENT OF 
 THE HARRAH’S ENTERTAINMENT, INC. 
 EXECUTIVE SUPPLEMENTAL SAVINGS PLAN 
  
 WHEREAS,
Harrah’s Entertainment, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), maintains the Harrah’s Entertainment, Inc. Executive Supplemental Savings Plan (the “Plan”) in order to provide its executives with an opportunity
and incentive to save for retirement and other purposes; 
 WHEREAS, the EDCP Committee now wishes to amend the Plan to provide for a special
lump sum distribution to a participant under the Plan during 2007 in accordance with the transition relief under Internal Revenue Service Notice 2005-1, Q/A-19(c), the Proposed Regulations under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code and
Internal Revenue Service Notice 2006-79; 
 WHEREAS, Section 12.1(a) provides that the EDCP Committee has the right to amend the Plan,
provided that such amendment does not have a material adverse financial effect on the Company or the Plan. 
 WHEREAS, the EDCP Committee has
approved the adoption of this Seventh Amendment to the 2001 Restatement of the Plan. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the 2001 Restatement of the Plan is
hereby amended, effective as of December , 2006, as follows: 
 AMENDMENT 
  

	1.	Article 8 is hereby amended to add new Section 8.6 to read in its entirety as follows: 

 8.6    Special In-Service Distribution. A Participant whose name is set forth on Appendix II hereto
shall receive a special lump sum distribution of the total balance of such Participant’s Accounts on January 2, 2007 (or within 30 days thereafter). Notwithstanding the foregoing, the lump sum distribution under this Section 8.6 shall
apply only to amounts that otherwise would not be payable during 2006. 
  

	2.	The Plan is hereby further amended to add new Appendix II in the form attached hereto. 

  

	3.	Except as herein amended, the Plan shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with the terms and conditions thereof. 









 This Seventh Amendment to the 2001 Restatement of the Plan is hereby executed by a duly authorized
officer of Harrah’s Entertainment, Inc., effective as of December 19, 2006. 
  

							
		 	HARRAH’S ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
				
		 	By:    	  	 /s/ Mary H. Thomas
	  	
				
		 	Its:	  	 Senior Vice President - HR
	  	

  

 2
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Itec Environmental Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Michael E. Hofmann, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Michael E. Hofmann
----------------------
Michael E. Hofmann
Chief Financial Officer

February 5, 2004
# C_2015146EN.01004401.xml

| 4.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 146/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 146/44

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 18 March 2015 — Rajala v OHIM

(Case F-24/14) (1)

1

((Civil service - Officials - Reports procedure - Appraisal report - General assessment of performance - Consistency))

(2015/C 146/59)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Tuula Rajala (El Campello, Spain) (represented by: H. Tettenborn, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: M. Paolacci, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the applicant’s appraisal report in respect of the period from 1 October 2011 to 31 December 2012.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Declares that Ms Rajala is to bear half of her own costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Declares that Ms Rajala is to bear half of her own costs;

| 3. | Declares that the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) is to bear its own costs and orders it to pay half of the costs incurred by Ms Rajala. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Declares that the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) is to bear its own costs and orders it to pay half of the costs incurred by Ms Rajala.

---

(1)  OJ C 175, 10.6.2014, p. 55.

1

---
#### § 156.6151-1 Time and place for paying of tax shown on returns.

The tax under chapter 54 (Greenmail) of the Code shown on any return shall, without notice of assessment and demand, be paid to the internal revenue officer with whom the return is filed at the time and place for filing such return (determined without regard to any extension of time for filing the return). For provisions relating to the time and place for filing such return, see §§ 156.6071-1 and 156.6091-1. For provisions relating to the extension of time for paying the tax, see § 156.6161-1.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS


Solely for the purposes of complying with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, we, William D. Gehl, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer,
and Kenneth P. Hahn, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer, of
Gehl Company, certify, based on our knowledge, that:

     (1)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 27,
          2003 (the "Periodic Report") to which this statement is an exhibit
          fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and

     (2)  information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Gehl Company.

Dated: November 10, 2003

                                          /s/ William D. Gehl
                                          ---------------------------
                                          William D. Gehl



                                          /s/ Kenneth P. Hahn
                                          ---------------------------
                                          Kenneth P. Hahn
Grafe, Jerome (DEP) 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

From: Brian Gannon [briangannon.j@gmail.com] 

Monday, September 24, 2012 11:23 AM 

Fichter, Katherine (DOT); Grafe, Jerome (DEP) 

Davey, Richard (DOT) 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

Blue Line/Red Line Extension Testimony 

Blue_Line.Red_Line_Testimony[1].docx 

Kenneth Kimmell 

Katherine Fitcher 

Jerome Graffe 

09/24/2012 

Dear Commissioner Kimmell and MDOT Board Members, 

Thank you for this opportunity to provide testimony on the critical issue of following through with the 

promised Blue line Red line connector. As a former Somerville/Cambridge resident; and a newer homeowner 

in East Boston (3 years) this Red Line/Blue Line connection is an essential missing link in Boston's Subway 

service. Isolated from the rest of metropolitan Boston due to the harbor and the tunnels East Boston 

residents need more opportunities to connect with other communities and become an easier destination to 

other community residents. Visiting friends from Cambridge and Somerville currently pay $3.50 just to come 

and visit me in my community since the three T connections make the trip arduous. Additionally many of East 

Boston residents work in both the tech and bio industry that is booming in Cambridge but also in the 

restaurants and hotels as well. The affordability of our neighborhood and the valuable labor it provides to the 

entire metro-Boston is a huge asset to small business owners. Please consider this connection and the 

positive economic impact on both the businesses that employ these workers as well as the improved quality of 

life of East Boston residents who fill these jobs. This connection is only a few blocks, the short term impact of 

its construction will result in long term positive environmental impacts, economic impacts, and a better 

connected city with fewer cars on the road. We provide the entire commonwealth with Transportation and 

bearing the burden of Logan Airport and its impacts, we also pay a toll to visit our own city, please don't skimp 

on our public transportation needs. 

Brian Gannon 

198 Everett Street 

East Boston MA 02128 

617-767-6046 

l
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 149 (Wednesday, August 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 39045]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18729]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

(A-580-810)


Welded ASTM A-312 Stainless Steel Pipe from the Republic of 
Korea: Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of Antidumping 
Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Martha Douthit, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office 6, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, 
Washington DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5050.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On February 2, 2009, the Department of Commerce (``Department'') 
published a notice of initiation of an administrative review of Welded 
ASTM A-312 Stainless Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea covering the 
period December 1, 2007 through November 30, 2008. See Initiation of 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Requests 
for Revocation in Part, 74 FR 5821 (February 2, 2009). The preliminary 
results of this administrative review are currently due no later than 
September 2, 2009.

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended (the ``Act''), the Department shall issue preliminary results 
in an administrative review of an antidumping duty order within 245 
days after the last day of the anniversary month of the order for which 
the administrative review was requested. However, if the Department 
determines that it is not practicable to complete the review within the 
aforementioned specified time limits, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act 
and
    19 CFR 351.213(h)(2) allow the Department to extend the 245-day 
period to 365 days.
    Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.213(h)(2), we determine that it is not practicable to complete the 
results of this review within the original time limit. The Department 
needs additional time to analyze a significant amount of information 
the parties submitted, and to determine whether any additional 
information is required. Therefore, in accordance with section 
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the Department has decided to extend the time 
limit for the preliminary results from 245 days to 365 days. The 
preliminary results will now be due no later than December 31, 2009. 
Unless extended, the final results continue to be due 120 days after 
the publication of the preliminary results, pursuant to section 
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1) of the Department's 
regulations.
    This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 
751(a)(3)(A) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: July 27, 2009.
John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing 
Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. E9-18729 Filed 8-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
IV

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 32

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the Sikh nation should be allowed

to exercise the right of self-determination in their homeland, Punjab,

Khalistan.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 22, 1995

Mr. PETE GEREN of Texas submitted the following concurrent resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the Sikh nation

should be allowed to exercise the right of self-determination in their homeland, Punjab, Khalistan.

Whereas the Sikh nation declared independence on October

7, 1987;

Whereas freedom is universally recognized as the birthright

of all nations;

Whereas self-determination is enshrined in Article 1 of the

United Nations Charter;

Whereas the Sikhs ruled Punjab from 1765 until it was annexed by the British in 1849;

Whereas an independent Sikh homeland is economically, militarily, and politically viable;
2

•HCON 32 IH

Whereas Khalistan will serve as a buffer state between India

and Pakistan;

Whereas Sikhs are committed to the principles of freedom,

justice, and democracy; and

Whereas an independent Sikh nation will help spread democracy and economic prosperity throughout all of South

Asia: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 Sikhs of Khalistan have the right to self-determination in

4 their homeland, Punjab, Khalistan.

Æ
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.6227(c)-1 Administrative adjustment request by the tax matters partner on behalf of the partnership. ( a ) *In general.* A request for an administrative adjustment filed by the tax matters partner on behalf of the partnership shall be filed on the form prescribed by the Internal Revenue Service for that purpose in accordance with that form's instructions. Except as otherwise provided in that form's instructions, the request shall be— ( 1 ) Filed with the service center where the original partnership return was filed (but, if the notice described in section 6223(a)(1) (beginning of an administrative proceeding) has already been mailed to the tax matters partner, the statement should be filed with the Internal Revenue Service office that mailed such notice);
( 2 ) Signed by the tax matters partner; and
( 3 ) Accompanied by revised schedules showing the effects of the proposed changes on each partner and an explanation of the changes.
( b ) *Denied request for treatment as a substituted return remains administrative adjustment request.* An administrative adjustment request filed by the tax matters partner on behalf of the partnership for which substituted return treatment is requested but not granted remains an administrative adjustment request. Thus, for example, the tax matters partner may file suit under section 6228(a) if the Internal Revenue Service fails to take timely action on the request.
( c ) *Effective date.* This section is applicable to partnership taxable years beginning on or after October 4, 2001. For years beginning prior to October 4, 2001, see § 301.6227(b)-1T contained in 26 CFR part 1, revised April 1, 2001.
[T.D. 8965, 66 FR 50554, Oct. 4, 2001]
0 

<.D 

....... 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 

AEROMAGNETIC MAP OF THE GREENWOOD LAKE QUA·DRANGLE 

.PASSAIC COUNTY, NEW JERSEY AND ORANGE COUNTY, NEW YORK 

By 

.John R. Henderson, Natalie Tyson, May Wilson and others 

GEOPHYSICAL INVESTIGATIONS 

MAP GP160 

PUBLISHED BY THE U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 

WASHINGTON, D. C. 

1957 

0 

<.D 

.......