alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      Exhibit 11
 
                    POTASH CORPORATION OF SASKATCHEWAN INC.
                       COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                         FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31
 
                  (Figures and amounts expressed in thousands,
                    except per share and per option amounts)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     01-1999      01-1998
                                                                     -------      -------
<S>  <C>                                                             <C>          <C>
A    Net income as reported, Canadian GAAP.......................    $39,517      $63,009
B    Items adjusting net income
C    Net income, US GAAP (A+B)...................................    $39,517      $63,009
D    Weighted average number of shares outstanding...............     54,249       54,007
E    Options outstanding to purchase equivalent shares...........      2,944        2,146
F    Average exercise price per option...........................    $ 70.36      $ 71.13
G    Average market price per share..............................    $ 60.08      $ 88.23
H    Period end market price per share...........................    $ 53.50      $ 90.88
I    Rate of Return available on option proceeds.................       5.00%        5.00%
CANADIAN GAAP
     Basic earnings per share (A/D)..............................    $  0.73      $  1.17
     Fully diluted earnings per share
J    Imputed earnings on options proceeds ((E*F*I)/4)............    $ 2,589      $ 1,908
     Fully diluted earnings per share ((A+J)/(D+E))..............    $  0.73      $  1.16
UNITED STATES GAAP
     Basic earnings per share (C/D)..............................    $  0.73      $  1.17
     Fully diluted earnings per share
K    Net additional shares issuable (E-(E*F/G))..................          0          416
     Fully diluted earnings per share (C/(D+K))..................    $  0.73      $  1.16
</TABLE>
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 105

Expressing the sense of the Congress that States should work more aggressively to attack the problem of violent crimes committed by repeat offenders and criminals serving abbreviated sentences.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 29, 1995

Mr. BARCIA submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that States should

work more aggressively to attack the problem of violent

crimes committed by repeat offenders and criminals serving abbreviated sentences.

Whereas a disturbing number of law-abiding citizens believe

they are prisoners in their own homes because of increasing violence in our society;

Whereas law-abiding citizens have the right to be fearful

knowing that violent offenders only serve on average 48

percent of the sentence they received;

Whereas more than 2⁄3 of persons under correctional supervision are currently on parole and not incarcerated;

Whereas 1 in 3 offenders admitted to State prisons were on

probation or parole violators;
2

•HCON 105 IH

Whereas the Federal Government eliminated parole in 1984

and prisoners convicted of Federal crimes now serve at

least 85 percent of their sentences;

Whereas under current Federal law, States are eligible for

prison construction funds if they keep felons in prison for

at least 85 percent of their sentence;

Whereas only 4 States, California, Minnesota, Oregon, and

Washington have laws that meet the 85 percent of sentence served requirements set forth in the 1994 crime

bill;

Whereas Florida recently passed a constitutional amendment—Stop Turning Out Prisoners (STOP)—to keep

violent felons in prison for at least 85 percent of their

term of imprisonment; and

Whereas the National Association of Police Organizations,

the International Chiefs of Police, the Fraternal Order of

Police, the National Association of Chiefs of Police, the

National District Attorney’s Association, and the Safe

Streets Coalition support the concept of an 85 percent

minimum length of service for violent criminals: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that—

3 (1) Congress commends California, Minnesota,

4 Oregon, Washington, and Florida for their existing

5 efforts with respect to prison time served by criminal

6 offenders;
3

•HCON 105 IH

1 (2) Congress encourages all remaining States to

2 adopt as quickly as possible legislation to increase

3 the time served by violent felons; and

4 (3) with respect to Federal crimes, Congress

5 reemphasizes its support for the requirement that

6 individuals who commit violent crimes should serve

7 at least 85 percent of their sentence.

Æ
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JAMES J. NETTER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-3469

[March 29, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Scott Suskauer, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2020-CF-007053-

AXXX-MB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Robert Porter, Assistant Public 

Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jessenia J. 

Concepcion, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Guzman v. State, 350 So. 3d 72 (Fla. 4th DCA 2022).

MAY, CIKLIN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# 4~ r ribune ~

NOT)CE Ol
~ L16 NEARINGS TO ADOPT 5ACRAMENTO RE L 8-FtOUR OZOT1E ATTAINMENT AtJD REASONABLE ER PRO(3AESS Pt..AN (SM) AND FINAL ENVIRON ENTAL IIYIPACT REPOR7 (FEIR) The air dlstricts in 3ac(ewtento Federal N"ttainment Area (SFNA) wHl hald public hE adoption of the Sacramento Regional 8-Hotr Ozone Attainment and Reasonable Fur1 (Plan). In addltlon to the Plan adoption, the Sacramento Meuopolitan,alir Quelity Ma (SSacMAQMD) wIN consider certlilcation of the Plan's Envir<iesmentai Im Re p ort. The ramento and Yolo counties, and portfong ot Plaoer,


### ~ l Dorado, So 

### ~~ Sutter crou The Plan shows that the region is meetin g requirements of the Clean Air Act for the 1 standard InGudln q meeting minimum emisslpn reduciion progress and reachin p air qualit) than 2018. The Plan also will updale the emission inveMory and establish new em transportatfeon and generai conformtty. In additfon, the plan makes eommitments to adopt i reasonably avell-able control moaeures. The Boards of Directors of the air districts In the SFNA wlil conaider the adoption ot L' public heari ngs in earty 2009. NOTE: As the lead agency, only the SMAQMD public hE ¢artfbcatfan of the FEIR.


### ~ The public hearings schedvtQ ts listed below. The Plan anif FE1R wlll be avallabie for o SMAQMD web site at http:/Mrww.airqualfty.orprcleanairplanfindex.shtml beg inning on Fri 2008. You may contact your bcal air district to requesi a printed oopy of the Plan and FEII By this natic&, ait interested partsos are speclffcaNy raquested to comment on the Plan 1 wridten testimony may be dtrected to the Alr Distria Board of Direciors at ttro public heay district oNic:e, as set torth below: Publlc Fieering 

### ~ c

locetlorts.



### ~ tr> 

### ~ wlttan Air Qualltp Managb 

### ~ strtct (SMAQMD) Sacnamer,to County Board Chambers Steven Lau 700 H Street, Sacramenio, CA 95814 777 12th Slraet. 3rd Floor, Secrar Thursday, January 22. 2009, 8:30 A.M. (918) 874-4834 Feather Rtver Air Quatiry M arrege mentUtstrict (FRAOMD) Yuba County Govemment Canter Sondra 1lndersson 915 Bth Streot, Conference Room M1 938 141h Street. Marysville. CA 9F MarysviNe. CA 95901 (530) 010 , 7659 Monday, February 02, 2009. 4:00 P.M. EI Dorado Counfiy Air Quality MAnagemenf Diatrfct (EDCAQMD) EI Dorado County Board oi Srrperv;sors' Carptyn Craig Mea ' Room 2t1,0 Fal rt ane Ca jrt , Bldg. C ,,0 Fa Lane, PlacerviNe, CA, 95887 Ptaoerville, CA 95687 Tussday. February to, 2009, 9:00 A.M (530) 8¢1-8862 Yolo-Solano Air Quality Mana ge rttent Distrlct (YSAQMD)

no Yol o

- Sola Air Quaiiry Managernent Ditr:rtct Mett.laies 11947 Galileo Court, Suite 103 , Davis, CA 95818 1 949 Galileo Court, Sulte 103, Da Wednesday. February 11. 2009. 9:00 A.M- (530) 757-3650 Planer County Air Poliution ContrW Districf (PCAPCD) Ptaccl County Board o1 Supenrisora Chambere Yu-Stwo Chang 1T6 FutweHer Avenue8A2 

### ~ 2 3A0 9560 3 

### ~~~A ~ 3 r Drive, SUe 24 rnur9day, Fobnrpr (530) 745-2330

~ Maps and genorai directions are available onitne at

t` http:/Mrww.atrquOlity.ort,ydeanalrplarYndex_shtml JanuarY 

# GE

~ o ,re, ov


# P«''

~ 

## Signed:

Date Amount Credit Balance

01 /05/09 $225.06 $0.00 $225.06
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                     5
                                    
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998

<CASH>                                          5,675
<SECURITIES>                                   45,065
<RECEIVABLES>                                   4,297
<ALLOWANCES>                                    2,097
<INVENTORY>                                     1,952
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               61,169
<PP&E>                                         16,237
<DEPRECIATION>                                 11,853
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 67,201
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           5,695
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       55,785
<OTHER-SE>                                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   67,201
<SALES>                                        15,659
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               15,659
<CGS>                                           3,427
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  10,005
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                587
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 2,814
<INCOME-TAX>                                      569
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    2,245
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .17
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0000855112
<NAME>                          Enex Oil & Gas Income Program IV-Series 4,L.P.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   sep-30-1996
<CASH>                                         5913
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  12904
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               24879
<PP&E>                                         1162418
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1048360
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 138937
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          24305
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     67146
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   138937
<SALES>                                        86919
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               86919
<CGS>                                          19807
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  296608
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               276801
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (209689)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                            <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999             DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,675                  20,175
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                      (30,925)                (32,425)
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                       0
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,273                   1,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,273)                 (1,500)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,273)                 (1,500)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0



</TABLE>
SERVED: MARCH 7, 2013 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

GRANT AVIATION, INC. 

FAA DOCKET No. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS No. FAA-2012-1261 

FDMS No. FAA-2010-1265 

FDMS No. FAA-2012-1266 

FDMS No. FAA-2012-1267 

FDMS No. FAA-2012-1268 

FDMS No. FAA-2013-0041 

ORDER DISMISSING PROCEEDINGS 

On December 14, 2012, the Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter "Complainant") 

filed Complaints in these cases. On November 29, 2012, Grant Aviation, Inc. (hereinafter 

"Respondent") had requested hearings. On February 28, 2013, Complainant withdrew its 

Complaints and moved to terminate the proceedings, citing settlement of the matters. 

14 C.P.R.§ 13.215 states: "At any time before or during a hearing, an agency attorney 

may withdraw a complaint or party may withdraw a request for a hearing without the 

consent of the administrative law judge. If an agency attorney withdraws the complaint or 

a party withdraws the request for a hearing and the answer, the administrative law judge 

shall dismiss the proceedings under this subpart with prejudice." 

WHEREFORE, the within filed Withdrawal of Complaints having been read and 

considered, it is ORDERED that: 

1. Complainant's Withdrawal of Complaints and Motion to Terminate Proceedings is 

hereby GRANTED; and 
2 

2. These proceedings be and are hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

Attachments - Service List 

ft.~C-~az. Richard C. Goodwin 

Administrative Law Judge 
3 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

Brent R. Cole, Respondent's Counsel 

Law Office ofBrent R. Cole, P.C. 

821 N Street, Suite 208 

Anchorage, AK 99501 

TEL: 907-277-8001 

FAX: 907-277-8002 

ONE COPY 

Glenn H. Brown, Complainant's Counsel 

Senior Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Alaskan Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

222 W. 7tlt Avenue #14 

Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 

TEL: 907-271-5271 

FAX: 907-271-2800 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-3 66-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: . 202-366-7536 

FDMS Nos. FAA-2012-

1261, 1265, 1266, 1267, 1268 

& 0041 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
§ 1.163-6T Reduction of deduction where section 25 credit taken (temporary). ( a ) *In general.* The amount of the deduction under section 163 for interest paid or accrued during any taxable year on a certified indebtedness amount with respect to a mortgage credit certificate which has been issued under section 25 shall be reduced by the amount of the credit allowable with respect to such interest under section 25 (determined without regard to section 26).
( b ) *Cross reference.* See §§ 1.25-1T through 1.25-8T with respect to rules relating to mortgage credit certificates.
[T.D. 8023, 50 FR 19355, May 8, 1985]
Jun 191210:43p Don Vasquez

Document Management Fac;jljty

..**~ ·~**  US Dept ofTransportation · ·**~** ·**~** 1200 New JerseyAve SE Room W12-140 Washington, DC 20590 Document 2012-0350 Dear Committee members, 940 498 1822 p.1

511 Oakcrest St Lake Dallas, TX 75065-2315 June 20, 2012



### Iam a FAA certified Private pilot with 1,375 hours and I typically

## fly 20- 30 hours each year. This letter is in 

### support ofthe FAA proposal to exempt recreational pilots from being required to obtain 3rd class physical exams from FAA AMEs as now required under FAR 61.23. This proposal would allowthe exemption for private and recreational pilots who are limited to flying a 180 HP aircraft 

### or less, 4 seats or less, and to only fly dayllghtVFR. These limitations restrict the flying to fun only purposes. Nightflying, IFR flights, and other business-related flights would still require a Class 

### Ill exam. Research has shown that LSA pilots (exemptfrom an FAA. medical) are not at risk for medica! emergencies while flying. Flying forfun, using the pilot's own determination if he/she is physicallyfit has shown it does not present any adverse medica! risk for pilots. Also this will reduce the cost offlying for about 100,000 pilots by eliminating the expensive FAA required physical exam. Therefore, I endorse this recommendation and hope the FAAwill approve this proposal. Sincerely,

# ~ Donald 

### J Vasq'7{z 511 Oakcrest

# ~ Lake Dallas, TX 75065-2315 940-498-1822 vasquezd@centurytel.net
To : Cc: Bcc: Subject: email from Dr Annesi-Maesano - Data (units) Clarification
From: Isabella Annesi-Maesano [mailto:annesimaesano@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday , February 15, 2011 4:19 AM To: Rooney, Andrew (NIH / NIEHS) [E] Subject: You are right! 

### Dear Andrew, You were perfectly right. The unit should have been microgr per liter. Thank you for alerting me. All my best regards Isabella

-- Dr Isabella Annesi-Maesano Directeur de Recherche INSERM Head: EPid Allergic Resp Dis Department ( www . epar . fr ) ADDRESS : EPAR UMR-S 707 INSERM & UPMC Paris6, Medi cal School Saint-Antoine Bureaux 803-4-6, 8ème étage 27, rue Chaligny 75571 Paris CEDEX 12 Tel: + 33 1 44738449 Fax: +33 1 44738454 Additional e-mail address: annesimaesano @ gmail
. com

............................... 

### Units correct? in: Annesi-Maesano I; Pollitt R; King G; Bousquet J; He llier G; Sahuquillo J; Huel G (2003). In utero exposure to lead and cord blood total IgE Is there a connection? Allergy, 58: 589-594.

__________________________________________

__________________________________________ Andrew A. Rooney, Ph.D. Senior Health Scientist National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences / National Toxicology Program NTP - Center for the Evaluation of Risks to Human R eproduction P.O. Box 12233, Mail Drop K2-04 RTP, NC 27709

____________________________ Phone: (919) 316-4704 Fax: (919) 541-3647 email: Andrew
. Rooney @ nih
. gov
39483.

#### STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT v. ROQUEMORE, Administrator, et al.

Decided June 28, 1962.

*Eugene Cook, Attorney General, Carter Goode, Richard L. Chambers, Assistants Attorney General, Phillip Benson Ham,*for plaintiff in error.

*Hugh D. Sosebee, Harold G. Clarke,*contra.

Hall, Judge.

1. *Code*§ 70-306 requires that “the opposite party” be served with a copy of the rule nisi (motion for new trial), and this term has been construed as including “all persons, if more than one, who were parties to the case and who are interested in sustaining the verdict.” *Carmichael v. City of Jackson,*194 Ga. 664 (22 SE2d 470). Ergo, all persons interested in sustaining the judgment below, or who would be affected by its reversal, are indispensable parties in the motion for new trial.

2. Where there is a joint judgment in favor of Frank L. Roquemore and James W. Roquemore (condemnees) in the amount of $15,000; the condemnor files a motion for new trial which refers only to Frank L. Roquemore; the rule nisi is directed only to Frank L. Roquemore; James W. Roquemore moves to dismiss the motion for new trial; and no amendment is filed by condemnor to make James W. Roquemore a party to said motion for new trial and rule nisi, it is not error for the ' trial court to sustain a motion to dismiss the motion for new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Felton, C. J., and Bell, J., concur.*