alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency

 Contractor's Cumulative Claim and Reconciliation

OMB No. 2030 – 0016

Expiration Date: XX/XX/XX

1. Contractor's Address (include zip code) 2. Contract No.

3. Total amounts claimed under this contract (less disallowances concurred by the contractor and disallowances not subject to appeal) and approved on Public 

Vouchers Nos. to (including completion vouchers).

Item Amount

Direct Labor $

Direct Material and Supplies $

Equipment $

Travel $

Subcontract Costs $

Other Direct Costs $

Consultant Fees $

Fixed Fee $

Indirect Costs (Total From Section 4) $

Total Amount Claimed $

4. Reconciliation of Indirect Costs Claimed. Record the amount of indirect costs calculated, for each cost center, using negotiated final indirect cost rate(s). 

Use provisional rate(s) if final rates are not negotiated for any fiscal year period(s). Use the reverse side of this form, if necessary, to display all years and 

cost centers.

Cost Center Cost Center Cost Center Cost Center Cost Center

FY

Base

Rate

Indirect Costs

FY

Base

Rate

Indirect Costs

FY

Base

Rate

Indirect Costs

Totals

No monies or other benefits may be paid unless this report is completed and filed as required in the EPA billing instructions. 

I certify that the information provided on this form and attachments thereto are accurate and complete. I acknowledge that any knowingly false or 

misleading information may be punishable by fine and/or imprisonment under applicable law.

Name and Title (Print or Type) Signature Date
Paperwork Reduction Act Notice

The public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 6.3 hours per 

response. Send comments on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and 

any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including through the use of automated collection techniques 

to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2822T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., 

NW, Washington, D.C. 20460. Include the OMB control number in any correspondence. Do not send the completed form

to this address.

Cost Center Cost Center Cost Center Cost Center Cost Center

FY

Base

Rate

Indirect Costs

FY

Base

Rate

Indirect Costs

FY

Base

Rate

Indirect Costs

FY

Base

Rate

Indirect Costs

FY

Base

Rate

Indirect Costs

Totals

No monies or other benefits may be paid unless this report is completed and filed as required in the EPA billing instructions.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 15 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 15

 Expressing the sense of Congress that a Member of Congress should be 
 treated to no special retirement benefits than those afforded to any 
                  employee of the Federal Government.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 20, 1995

Mr. Gutierrez submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of Congress that a Member of Congress should be 
 treated to no special retirement benefits than those afforded to any 
                  employee of the Federal Government.

Whereas action to resolve the Federal deficit is likely to cause economic 
        hardship for all Americans;
Whereas most Members of this Congress have chosen public service for the sake of 
        their community and the Nation rather than as a vehicle for personal 
        profit;
Whereas many Americans employed in the private sector have grave concerns 
        relating to the viability and continued payment rates of pension plans 
        in which they and their colleagues are enrolled;
Whereas title 5 of the United States Code includes language relating to the 
        benefits available to Federal employees, including Members of Congress 
        and their staff; and
Whereas provisions set forth in said title and elsewhere may afford benefits to 
        Members of Congress upon retirement, and to their spouses, that are not 
        available to other Federal employees, and may be perceived as overly 
        generous to the Members: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) steps be taken to examine whether a disparity exists 
        between benefits available to Members of Congress and those 
        offered to other employees of the Federal Government, with the 
        intent of discovering whether the retirement benefits available 
        to Members are more generous than those afforded to other 
        employees,
            (2) hearings be conducted by the House Committee on 
        Government Reform and Oversight in order to review such 
        findings,
            (3) legislation be drafted that resolves such differences 
        by, in general, removing any privileges in Federal retirement 
        programs afforded exclusively to Members and not available to 
        other Federal employees, and
            (4) that action be taken on this matter within the first 
        one hundred days of the One Hundred Fourth Congress.
                                 <all>
```
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2010-1190 Directorate ID: 2010-SW-038-AD

Helicopter Model: Apical Emergency Float Kits Installed on Various Model Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 324 Helicopters in the U.S. registry.

Reason: The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent helicopter occupants from 

further injury due to unnecessary exposure to harsh water conditions and to aid in deploying 

liferafts when liferafts are available on the helicopter and can be activated after a water landing.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $70

Labor per Helicopter

(0.5 x $85/work-hour)

$43

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $113 

Total US Fleet Cost $36,450

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Venessa Stiger
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4501 — HAL/Egeria/NB)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/C 297/13)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

(2)OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.

----
IV

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 88

Regarding recognition of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 27, 1995

Mr. SCARBOROUGH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Regarding recognition of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.

Whereas the Socialist Republic of Vietnam has failed to give

a full accounting of the United States personnel who remain not accounted for as a result of service in the

Armed Forces or other Federal Government service during the Vietnam era and has failed to adequately work

with the United States in determining their whereabouts

and condition;

Whereas the Hanoi government continues to remain a brutal

totalitarian communist regime dedicated to oppressing its

people and routinely giving to flaunting all standards of

international law and morality;

Whereas the people of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam are

entitled to live in a free and open society and deserve the
2

•HCON 88 IH

backing of the American people and Government in their

quest for liberty;

Whereas there live in the United States today several thousand refugees of the Hanoi regime who fled to these

shores to build a better life for themselves and their families until such time as they would be free to return to

their homes in a land both free and prosperous;

Whereas the United States must continue to stand for just

and open regimes in all parts of the world, especially in

those parts where it has been actively engaged; and

Whereas the United States must remain true to the memory

of the men and women who served in the Vietnam conflict and must therefore refuse to recognize the Hanoi

government which was responsible for the death of over

50,000 Americans: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 recent decision of President Clinton to recognize the Gov4 ernment of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam was in viola5 tion of the principles of the United States, and that he

6 should revoke such recognition until such time as the

7 Hanoi regime fully cooperates in determining the status

8 of all personnel who remain not accounted for as a result

9 of service in the Armed Forces or other Federal Govern10 ment service during the Vietnam era and adopts a free

11 and democratic government that respects human rights

12 and observes internationally recognized norms of behavior.

Æ
**Exhibit32.1**

**Certification of the Chief Executive OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kaiser Group Holdings,Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas W.McMinn, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of myknowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| August 11, 2006 | /s/ Douglas W. McMinn                 |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------|
|            | Douglas W. McMinn,                    |
|            | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
1

Step 4: If successful, THPHOON will beep, 

Return to the main screen. 'Mag Cali' will be 

displayed in MODE area.

CAMERA

MULTICOPTER

Video Settings

Audio Switch

GPS

Calibration

OFF

ON

Compass

Accelerometer

Step 3: Tap the Setting button on the 

ST10+ screen, then tap the Calibration 

button. Choose Compass option and tap it. 

Model:Q500 4K Welcome,Pilot 07:25 

GPS

N/A

SAT

N/A

POS

N/A E

N/A N

MODE

Mag Cali

ALT

N/A ft

VOLTS

N/A V

G-SPD

N/A mph

DIS

N/A ft

System Settings Flight Settings Model Select

WB

ISO 32

1/250s

Auto

Auto

Lock

Sunny

Cloudy

Fluorescent

AWB

3840 x 2160 F30
Flashes yellow 

Flashes red

Flashes green

Glows solid green

Flashes green ,blue slowly 

3

- Without T-card or T-card Memory Full 

- WiFi Error 

- WiFi Initialized 

- WiFi Connected to Terminal 

- Recoding Video or Taking Still Photos 

1

- Active Home Mode Activated Flashes red rapidly for 3 seconds and 

white for 1 second

- Active Smart Mode, Follow Me / Watch Me Feature Activated Solid green for 3 seconds and white for 1 second

1 second 1 second 1 second 1 second

1 second 1 second 1 second 1 second

1 second 1 second 1 second 1 second
(logo) CWCapital

ASSET MANAGEMENT

 

Annual Statement as to Compliance

For the Period of January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015

 

MSBAM 2015-C27 

 

 

In accordance with Item 1123 of Regulation AB andwith the requirements detailed in §13.9 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) for the above-mentioned CMBS pool, (the “CMBS Pool”), CWCapital Asset Management LLC (“CWCAM”), in its capacity as Special Servicer, is providing this Officer’s Certificate with respect to the following:

 

(A) a review of CWCAM’s activities during the preceding calendar year or portion thereof (the "Reporting Period") and of CWCAM’s performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision and; 

 

(B) to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, CWCAM has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

 

 

Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. 

 

 

Sincerely,

CWCapital Asset Management LLC

/s/ David B. Iannarone

David B. Iannarone

President

 

 

 

 

 

7501 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 500 West, Bethesda, MD 20814 www.cwcapital.com
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

May 17, 2024

SC-2023-0549

Sherman Dallas, Tanyanita Dallas, Chadrick Dallas, Glenda Freeman, 

and Louis Freeman v. Nicole Hicks, as administrator of the Estate of 

Willie Louis Hicks, deceased (Appeal from Tallapoosa Circuit Court: CV21-900031).

CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT

WHEREAS, the ruling on the application for rehearing filed in this 

case and indicated below was entered in this cause on May 17, 2024:

APPLICATION OVERRULED. NO OPINION. Mitchell, J. -- 

Parker, C.J., and Shaw, Bryan, and Mendheim, JJ., concur.

WHEREAS, the appeal in the above referenced cause has been duly 

submitted and considered by the Supreme Court of Alabama and the 

judgment indicated below was entered in this cause on March 22, 2024:

AFFIRMED. Mitchell, J. -- Parker, C.J., and Shaw, J., concur. 

Bryan and Mendheim, JJ., concur in the result.

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Rule 41, Ala. R. App. P., IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED that this Court's judgment in this cause is certified 

on this date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise ordered 

by this Court or agreed upon by the parties, the costs of this cause are 

hereby taxed as provided by Rule 35, Ala. R. App. P.

I, Megan B. Rhodebeck, certify that this is the record of the judgment of the Court, witness 

my hand and seal.

Clerk, Supreme Court of Alabama
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 112 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J. Res.112

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
  the fourth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-five

                            Joint Resolution

 
 Providing for the appointment of Louis Gerstner as a citizen regent of 
          the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 
43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian 
Institution, in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by 
reason of the resignation of Ira Michael Heyman of California on May 
27, 1994, is filled by the appointment of Louis Gerstner of 
Connecticut. The appointment is for a term of six years and shall take 
effect on the date on which this joint resolution becomes law.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Matthew Otis CHARLES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-5806.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

June 17, 2002.

Before MARTIN, Chief Circuit Judge; KEITH, and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges.

*ORDER*

Matthew Otis Charles, proceeding pro se, appeals a district court judgment denying his motion essentially seeking to reopen his prior 28 U.S.C. § 2255 case under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. RApp. P. 34(a).

In 1996, a jury convicted Charles of conspiracy to distribute cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, possession of cocaine base with intent to distribute cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841, making false statements to firearms dealers in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(6), and being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). The district court sentenced Charles to a total of 420 months of imprisonment. A panel of this court affirmed Charles’s convictions arid sentence on appeal. *United States v. Charles,*138 F.3d 257 (6th Cir.1998).

Thereafter, in November 1998, Charles filed a § 2255 motion, which the district court denied on November 18,1999. After the district court denied Charles a certificate of appealability (COA), this court also denied Charles a COA. *Charles v. United States,*No. 99-6666 (6th Cir. June 20, 2000). In July 2000, Charles filed a motion for an order authorizing the district court to consider a successive motion to vacate -under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Subsequently, the district court granted Charles’s motion to dismiss his motion for permission to file a second or successive § -2255 motion. In December 2000, Charles filed another motion for permission to file a successive § 2255 motion. On May 2, 2001, this court denied Charles’s motion. *In re: Charles,*No. 00-6782 (6th Cir. May 2, 2001).

In May 2001, Charles filed a Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion essentially seeking to reopen his criminal case. Charles argued that he had discovered new evidence that entitled him to have his convictions and sentence vacated. Upon review, the district court denied the motion because Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) does not apply to criminal cases. Charles has filed a timely appeal, essentially reasserting his claims.

Upon review, we conclude that the district court properly denied Charles’s Rule 60(b) motion. Charles’s motion is an admitted attempt to overturn his criminal conviction on the authority of Rule 60(b). However, a party may not seek relief from a criminal sentence under Rule 60(b), because Rule 60(b) is not applicable to criminal proceedings. *See*Fed.R.Civ.P. 1; *United States v. Mosavi,*138 F.3d 1365, 1366 (11th Cir.1998). Thus, Charles is not *759entitled to Rule 60(b) relief, and the district court properly denied his motion.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Rule 34(j)(2)(C), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

January 19, 2021

No. 0 4

- 20

- 00515

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF V.S., A CHILD

From the 285th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019PA00518 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant V.S.’s motion for leave to file his brief late is GRANTED. Appellant V.S.’s brief was filed on January 19, 2021

.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 19th day of January, 2021

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
#### Cancellier v. Cancellier

*92Before Gibson, P. J., Carson and Cummins, JJ.

*Michael E. Kusturiss,*for plaintiff.

October 27, 1952.

Gibson, P. J.,

The difficulty with this proceeding is obvious. There has been no service of the complaint on defendant.

Procedural Rule 1124 regulates the service in divorce proceedings: (1) It may be served by the sheriff, within the Commonwealth, by handing a copy to defendant by either himself or the deputization of the sheriff of any county in which defendant may be found; (2) by a constable of the county in which the action is pending, if authorized by rule of court; (3) by plaintiff, outside the Commonwealth, by having an attorney-at-law, other than attorney for plaintiff, hand a copy to defendant; (4) by sending a copy by registered mail to defendant and securing a return receipt signed by defendant personally.

If service cannot be made under 1 and 2, and has not been made under 3 and 4, and the sheriff or constable has made a return or affidavit of “Not Found”, plaintiff may have service by publication which shall be made by the sheriff. The requirements for publication must be strictly complied with. One of the essentials is a return by the sheriff or affidavit by a constable, where service by constable is authorized, that defendant was “Not Found”.

In this case, the attorney for plaintiff makes an affidavit that he made two efforts to serve defendant by registered mail outside the State of Pennsylvania and that both failed and on neither of them did he secure a return receipt signed by defendant personally, and set forth “that therefore a return of ‘Not Found’ is hereby made by reason thereof”. We do not find any authority in the attorney for plaintiff substituting himself for the sheriff.

On the same day, the attorney for plaintiff filed a praecipe for publication. In accordance therewith an *93order of publication was issued and the sheriff proceeded with an attempted service by publication without having previously made a return of “Not Pound”.

The result of all this is there is no service whatever and the decree at this time must be refused.
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.6203-1 Method of assessment.

The district director and the director of the regional service center shall appoint one or more assessment officers. The district director shall also appoint assessment officers in a Service Center servicing his district. The assessment shall be made by an assessment officer signing the summary record of assessment. The summary record, through supporting records, shall provide identification of the taxpayer, the character of the liability assessed, the taxable period, if applicable, and the amount of the assessment. The amount of the assessment shall, in the case of tax shown on a return by the taxpayer, be the amount so shown, and in all other cases the amount of the assessment shall be the amount shown on the supporting list or record. The date of the assessment is the date the summary record is signed by an assessment officer. If the taxpayer requests a copy of the record of assessment, he shall be furnished a copy of the pertinent parts of the assessment which set forth the name of the taxpayer, the date of assessment, the character of the liability assessed, the taxable period, if applicable, and the amounts assessed.