alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 1 556

_____________________________
T REVOR A LAN H ARVEY , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Russell Healey , Judge

. August 13, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. B.L. T HOMAS , K ELSEY , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender Tallahassee, for A ppellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         2,580,028
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  35,221
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,615,249
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,565,839
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          433,951
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,131,888
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,565,839
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               69,244
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               33,900
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                35,344
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   35,344
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .00
        

</TABLE>
A. G., A CHILD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-1974

_____________________________/

Opinion filed December 1, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Henry E. Davis, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Archie F. Gardner, Jr., Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and David Llanes, Assistant Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, ROWE, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**MAC R1204-0109062 Old Annapolis RoadColumbia, MD 21045Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. 375 PARK AVE FL 2Wells Fargo Securities, LLCNEW YORK, New York 10152-0002  RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-NXS4, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-NXS4 Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"): (a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and (b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.  February 25, 2016  /s/ Brian SmithBRIAN SMITHVice President  Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
### SERVED: November 24, 2014

:... !
..-. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC IN THE MATTER OF GLOBAL ARMS AND AMMUNITION DOCKETNO. FAA 2014-0320 (Civil PenaltyAction). : ;**~: --~~**  ,._

ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT'S MOTION FORLEAVE TO FILE AN ANSWER Global Arms and Ammunition (hereinafter "Respondent") filed a Motion for Leave to File an Answer dated October 14, 2014, arguing it was not properly served. The Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter "Complainant") has not filed a Reply. WHEREFORE, it be and is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Respondent's Motion for Leave to File an Answer is GRANTED; and 2. Respondent's Answer dated October 14, 2014 is received; and 3. Paragraphs #2 and #3 of the Procedural Order are amended as follows: a. On orbefore March 6, 2015, the parties shall conclude all discovery including, but not limited to, depositions, documentproduction, responses to productionrequests and/or interrogatories. Ifthe parties cannotresolve a discovery dispute they shall submitthe dispute to the undersigned for resolution in a timely manner; b. The parties shall be preparedto presentthis case at a hearing on or after March 6, 2015, subjectto the availability ofcourtroom facilities. The specific date andtime for the hearing will be forthcoming in a separate Order.

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment

- Service List

1 ,__/SERVICE LIST- BY

### U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: HearingDocket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W1000 1 ONE COPY 

### David Carl Williams, President Global Arms and Ammunition, Respondent 

### 28 -3ih StreetN.E., Suite A Auburn, W A 98002 TEL: 206-325-9400 Kyle Lomazow, Complainant's Counsel 

### Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Ave., S.W. Renton, W A 98057 TEL: 425-227-1847 FAX: 425-227-1007 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative Law Judge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2014-0320 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 2
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

  

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2015, byand among Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Master Servicer, CWCapial Asset Management LLC, as SpecialServicer, Situs Holdings, LLC, as Trust Advisor, Wilmington Trust, NationalAssociation, as Trustee, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCertificate Administrator, Certificate Registrar, Authenticating Agent andCustodian, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series2015-C27 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein nototherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 13.9 ofthe Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial MortgageServices do hereby certify that:

 

1.  A review of theactivities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016through December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.  To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
§ 20.6165-1 Bonds where time to pay tax or deficiency has been extended. ( a ) *Extensions under sections 6161 and 6163(b) of time to pay tax or deficiency.* If an extension of time for payment of tax or deficiency is granted under section 6161 or 6163(b), the district director may, if he deems it necessary, require the executor to furnish a bond for the payment of the amount in respect of which the extension is granted in accordance with the terms of the extension. However, such bond shall not exceed double the amount with respect to which the extension is granted. For other provisions relating to bonds required where extensions of time to pay estate taxes or deficiencies are granted under sections 6161 and 6163(b), see the regulations under section 7101 contained in part 301 of this chapter (Regulations on Procedure and Administration).
( b ) *Extensions under section 6163 of time to pay estate tax attributable to reversionary or remainder interests.* As a prerequisite to the postponement of the payment of the tax attributable to a reversionary or remainder interest as provided in § 20.6163-1, a bond equal to double the amount of the tax and interest for the estimated duration of the precedent interest must be furnished conditioned upon the payment of the tax and interest accrued thereon within six months after the termination of the precedent interest. If after the acceptance of a bond it is determined that the amount of the tax attributable to the reversionary or remainder interest was understated in the bond, a new bond or a supplemental bond may be required, or the tax, to the extent of the understatement, may be collected. The bond must be conditioned upon the principal or surety promptly notifying the district director when the precedent interest terminates and upon the principal or surety notifying the district director during the month of September of each year as to the continuance of the precedent interest, if the duration of the precedent interest is dependent upon the life or lives of any person or persons, or is otherwise indefinite. For other provisions relating to bonds where an extension of time has been granted for paying the tax, see the regulations under section 7101 contained in part 301 of this chapter (Regulations on Procedure and Administration).
[T.D. 6526, 26 FR 418, Jan. 19, 1961, as amended by T.D. 6600, 27 FR 4986, May 29, 1962]
§ 1.44-1 Allowance of credit for purchase of new principal residence after March 12, 1975, and before January 1, 1977. ( a ) *General rule.* Section 44 provides a credit against the tax imposed by chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 in the case of an individual who purchases a new principal residence (as defined in paragraph (a) of § 1.44-5) which is property to which section 44 applies (as provided in § 1.44-2). Subject to the limitations set forth in paragraph (b) of this section, the credit is in an amount equal to 5 percent of the purchase price (as defined in paragraph (b) of § 1.44-5).
( b ) *Limitations* — ( 1 ) *Maximum credit.* The credit allowed under section 44 and this section may not exceed $2,000.
( 2 ) *Limitation to one residence.* Such credit shall be allowed with respect to only one residence of the taxpayer; the combined purchase prices of more than one new principal residence cannot be aggregated to increase the credit allowed.
( 3 ) *Married individuals.* In the case of a husband and wife who file a joint return under section 6013, the maximum credit allowed on the joint return is $2,000. In the case of married individuals filing separate returns the maximum credit allowable to each spouse is $1,000. Where a husband and wife do not make equal contributions with respect to the purchase price of the new principal residence, allocation of the credit is to be made in proportion to their respective ownership interests in such residence. For this purpose, tenants by the entirety or joint tenants with right of survivorship are treated as equal owners.
( 4 ) Certain other taxpayers. Where a new principal residence is purchased by two or more taxpayers (other than a husband and wife), the amount of the credit allowed will be allocated among the taxpayers in proportion to their respective ownership interests in such residence, with the limitation that the sum of the credits allowed to all such taxpayers shall not exceed $2,000. For this purpose, joint tenants with right of survivorship are treated as equal owners. For an example of the operation of this provision see Example (2) of § 1.44-5(b)(2)(ii).
( 5 ) *Application with other credits.* The credit allowed by this section shall not exceed the amount of the tax imposed by chapter 1 of the Code for the taxable year, reduced by the sum of the credits allowable under— ( i ) Section 33 (relating to taxes of foreign countries and possessions of the United States),
( ii ) Section 37 (relating to retirement income),
( iii ) Section 38 (relating to investment in certain depreciable property),
( iv ) Section 40 (relating to expenses of work incentive program),
( v ) Section 41 (relating to contributions to candidates for public office), and
( vi ) Section 42 (relating to personal exemptions).
[T.D. 7391, 40 FR 55851, Dec. 2, 1975]
#### People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Raymond J. Kuhn, Defendant-Appellee.

Gen. No. 52,634.

First District, Second Division.

December 17, 1968.

John J. Stamos, State’s Attorney of Cook County, of Chicago (Elmer C. Kissane and Thomas M. Burnham, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel), for appellant.

No appearance made or brief filed in behalf of appellee.

MR. PRESIDING JUSTICE BURKE

delivered the opinion of the court.

On September 20, 1966, Raymond J. Kuhn was arrested and charged with driving a motor vehicle with a load 6,660 pounds in excess of the maximum allowable under the provisions of Ill Rev Stats 1965, c 95%, § 228. On that day he executed a bail bond and was released from custody. The case was postponed from time to time by judges hearing nonjury cases. On March 1, 1967, the defendant said he wanted a trial by jury. The case was set for March 7, 1967. Thereafter the case was continued by

*397order of court or on motion of the People until July 26, 1967, when the defendant moved for discharge under the provisions of Ill Rev Stats 1965, c 38, § 103-5. Defendant asserted that 120 days or more had elapsed since he filed his “demand for trial.” On July 26, 1967, the court sustained defendant’s motion to dismiss and discharged him. The People appealed. The defendant has not appeared or filed a brief.

 We are of the opinion that the People are right in their position that the defendant’s indication that he would not waive a jury trial did not constitute a demand for an immediate trial and that as he was at liberty on bond at all times subsequent to his arrest, he was not entitled to be discharged. The State’s Attorney relies on People v. Baskin, 38 Ill2d 141, 230 NE2d 208. In Baskin the defendant appealed, complaining that his constitutional right to a speedy trial had been violated. The court said at page 145, “In the present case the defendant was at liberty on bond at all times subsequent to the filing of the complaint. The original request for a jury trial cannot be considered as a demand for immediate trial, but only a demand that when trial was held it would be before a jury.” It was incumbent upon the defendant to make a demand for trial in order to avail himself of his statutory right to a speedy trial. No such demand appears in the record. Therefore the order dismissing the complaint and discharging the defendant is reversed and the cause is remanded with directions that it be reinstated and for further proceedings.

Order reversed and cause remanded with directions.

MCNAMARA and LYONS, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [Docket 51-2008]

A public hearing will be held on the application for subzone authority at the ThyssenKrupp Steel and Stainless USA, LLC (ThyssenKrupp) facility in Calvert, Alabama (73 FR 58535-58536, 10/7/08). The Commerce examiner will hold the public hearing on September 10, 2009 at 1:00 p.m., at the Department of Commerce, Room 4830, 1401 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20230. Interested parties should indicate their intent to participate in the hearing and provide a summary of their remarks no later than September 4, 2009.

The comment period for the case referenced above is being reopened through September 25, 2009, to allow interested parties additional time in which to comment. Rebuttal comments may be submitted during the subsequent 15-day period, until October 13, 2009. Submissions (original and one electronic copy) shall be addressed to the Board's Executive Secretary at: Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 2111, 1401 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20230.

For further information, contact Elizabeth Whiteman at Elizabeth_Whiteman@ita.doc.gov or (202) 482-0473.

Dated: July 24, 2009.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-18475 Filed 7-31-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
#### Quashnock v. Sigmund

Before Montgomery and Nixon, JJ.

*David Roth,*for plaintiff.

*Tryon & Ludwig,*for defendant.

June 10, 1953.

Nixon, J.,

In this case it appears that both relator and defendant are, and were at all significant times, duly elected Commisisoners of Reserve Township, a township of the first class. Pursuant to section 701 of the First Class Township Code of June 24, 1931, P. L. 1206, art. VII, sec. 701, as *585amended, 53 PS §19092-701 (Supp. 1952), the township commissioners met on January 7, 1952, for the purpose of organizing. All of the commissioners were present. At that meeting, relator was elected president by his fellow commissioners. He served in this capacity until April 14, 1952, when, at a regular monthly meeting of the board of commissioners all members being present, relator was removed from office and defendant was elected president of the board. On February 16, 1953, relator brought this action in quo warranto, seeking to remove defendant from the office of president of the board of township commissioners, and to have himself declared president. Defendant has filed preliminary objections by way of demurrer and asserts that the office of president of the board of township commissioners is an appointive one, and a majority of the commissioners may remove the incumbent at any time and appoint another commissioner to the office.

We agree that the contention of defendant is correct. The same question was decided many years ago in the case of Commonwealth ex rel. Mayer v. Pape, 21 Dist. R. 1123. To be sure, the First Class Township Act has undergone some changes since 1912, but nowhere in the present act, do we find any expression of legislative intent indicating a contrary view of the law on this question.

We have given careful consideration to the applicable constitutional provisions and as a result are obliged to hold that the office of president of the board of township commissioners is an appointive office within the meaning of article VI, sec. 4, of the Constitution. Therefore, a person holding such office may be removed at the pleasure of the board of commissioners.

Defendant’s demurrer must be sustained and the complaint dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1



SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, the undersigned officer of Sky Financial Group, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge,
that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Marty E. Adams     
|Marty E. Adams         
|Chairman, President and
|Chief Executive Officer



October 28, 2005



The signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21 - 0530 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. DAVID ABRAHAM LORENZ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 26, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 19 2022

09/19/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0530