alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS AND THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS FOUND IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR TO DATE AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          18,508
<SECURITIES>                                    15,115
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,988
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     18,860
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                71,296
<PP&E>                                          10,347
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  84,562
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,830
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        53,320
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,412
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    84,562
<SALES>                                         67,566
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                69,799
<CGS>                                           41,532
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   52,458
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,748
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,134
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,614
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,614
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.46
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-2007

In Re: JAMES JULIUS JACKSON,

Debtor.

JAMES JULIUS JACKSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN

RESOURCES,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

ROBERT TRUMBLE,

Trustee - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater,

District Judge. (CA-01-27, AP-00-3175, BK-00-32337)

Submitted: January 31, 2002 Decided: February 6, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Julius Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Tracey Brown Dawson,

STEPTOE & JOHNSON, Martinsburg, West Virginia; Robert Trumble,

MCNEER, HIGHLAND & MCMUNN, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

James Julius Jackson appeals from the district court’s order

affirming the bankruptcy court’s dismissal of his adversary proceeding. We have reviewed the record, the district court’s

opinion, and the bankruptcy court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Jackson v. West VA Dep’t Health & Human Resources, Nos.

CA-01-27; AP-00-3175; BK-00-32337 (N.D.W. Va. July 24, 2001). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF S.J.H.,

A Child.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00182-CV

Appeal from the

65th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2017DCM7953)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was reversible 

error in the judgment. We therefore reverse the judgment of the court below and remand the 

cause for further proceedings, in accordance with this Court’s opinion.

It appearing to this Court that Appellant is indigent for purposes of appeal, this Court 

makes no order with respect thereto. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2019.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before Rodriguez, J., Palafox, J., and McClure, Senior Judge

McClure, Senior Judge (Sitting by Assignment)
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Roy F. Darwin

Decided June 25, 1968

The Supreme Court of the United States, on May 20, 1968, granted a motion of the petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, a petition for certiorari, and it also reversed the judgment in *State*v. *Darwin,*155 Conn. 124, 230 A.2d 573, and remanded the case “for further proceedings not inconsistent with our decision herein”. The opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States is reported in 391 U.S. 346, 88 S. Ct. 1488, 20 L. Ed. 2d 630.

Pursuant to, and in conformity with, the mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States, the judgment of the Superior Court is reversed, a new trial is ordered, and the case is remanded to the Superior Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States of May 20, 1968, hereinbefore referred to.
128 STAT. 1006 PUBLIC LAW 113–80—FEB. 12, 2014 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2860: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 113–268 (Comm. on Oversight and Government Reform). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014): 

Jan. 14, considered and passed House. 

Jan. 29, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 113–80 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that the Inspector General of 

the Office of Personnel Management may use amounts in the revolving fund 

of the Office to fund audits, investigations, and oversight activities, and for 

other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘OPM IG Act’’. 

SEC. 2. USE OF OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT REVOLVING 

FUND FOR AUDITS, INVESTIGATIONS, AND OVERSIGHT 

ACTIVITIES. 

Subsection (e) of section 1304 of title 5, United States Code, 

is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1), by adding before the period at the 

end of the first sentence the following: ‘‘, and for the cost 

of audits, investigations, and oversight activities, conducted 

by the Inspector General of the Office, of the fund and the 

activities financed by the fund’’; and 

(2) in paragraph (5)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘The Office’’ and inserting ‘‘(A) The 

Office’’; and 

(B) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(B) Such budget shall include an estimate from the 

Inspector General of the Office of the amount required to pay 

the expenses to audit, investigate, and provide other oversight 

activities with respect to the fund and the activities financed 

by the fund. 

‘‘(C) The amount requested by the Inspector General under 

subparagraph (B) shall not exceed .33 percent of the total 

budgetary authority requested by the Office under subparagraph (A).’’. 

Approved February 12, 2014. 

Budget estimate. 

5 USC 101 note. 

OPM IG Act. 

Feb. 12, 2014 

[H.R. 2860] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
----

Order of the Court of First Instance of 16 October 2006 — Self Service Station Hasselerbaan v Commission

(Case T-276/99) (1)

(2006/C 310/54)

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Second Chamber Extended Composition has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

----

(1)OJ C 47, 19.2.2000.

----
§ 1.501(c)(17)-3 Relation to other sections of the Code. ( a ) *Taxability of benefit distributions* — ( 1 ) *Separation benefits.* If the separation benefits described in section 501(c)(17)(D)(i) are funded entirely by employer contributions, then the full amount of any separation benefit payment received by an employee is includible in his gross income under section 61(a). If any such separation benefit is funded by both employer and employee contributions, or solely by employee contributions, the amount of any separation benefit payment which is includible in the gross income of the employee is the amount by which such distribution and any prior distributions of such separation payments exceeds the employee's total contributions to fund such separation benefits.
( 2 ) *Sick and accident benefits.* Any benefit payment received from the trust under the part of the plan, if any, which provides for the payment of sick and accident benefits must be included in gross income under section 61(a), unless specifically excluded under section 104 or 105 and the regulations thereunder. See section 105(b) and § 1.105-2 for benefit payments expended for medical care, benefit payments in excess of actual medical expenses, and benefit payments which an employee is entitled to receive irrespective of whether or not he incurs expenses for medical care. See section 213 and § 1.213-1(g) for benefit payments representing reimbursement for medical expenses paid in prior years. See § 1.501(c)(17)-2(i) for the requirement that a trust described in section 501(c)(17) which receives employee contributions must be part of a written plan which provides for the allocation of the cost of funding sick and accident benefits.
( b ) *Exemption as a voluntary employees' beneficiary association.* Section 501(c)(17)(E) contemplates that a trust forming part of a plan providing for the payment of supplemental unemployment compensation benefits may, if it qualifies, apply for exemption from income tax under section 501(a) either as a voluntary employees' beneficiary association described in section 501(c)(9) or as a trust described in section 501(c)(17).
( c ) *Returns.* A trust which is described in section 501(c)(17) and which is exempt from tax under section 501(a) must file a return in accordance with section 6033 and the regulations thereunder. If such a trust realizes any unrelated business taxable income, as defined in section 512, the trust is also required to file a return with respect to such income.
( d ) *Effective date.* Section 501(c)(17) shall apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1959, and shall apply to supplemental unemployment benefit trusts regardless of when created or organized.
[T.D. 6972, 33 FR 12902, Sept. 12, 1968]
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Russell M. Whitney

Argued March 5

decided March *5,*1968

*Arlen D. Nicho wits,*assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (state).

*John D. Sailing,*for the appellant (defendant).

The motion by the state to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County is granted unless the defendant files his brief on or before April 2, 1968.
Amendment Number 1, dated January 3, 2007



 EXHIBIT 10.7.1 
 Amendment Number 1 to 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED 
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 Frank J. Wood

 THIS AMENDMENT, is made effective as of January 3, 2007, by and between Foundation Coal Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”) and (“Executive”). 
 WHEREAS, the Company and Executive previously entered into an Amended and
Restated Employment Agreement, dated March 13, 2006 (the “Employment Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (“Committee”) has considered the annual bonus percentage of base salary for obtaining target performance contained in the Employment Agreement; and 
 WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee requested a report from its independent compensation consultant regarding the appropriate percentage level of base
salary for obtaining target performance; and 
 WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee has reviewed the information provided by independent
compensation consultant and has determined it would be in the best interest of the Company and its Stockholders to amend the Employment Agreement to revise the percentage level of base salary for obtaining target performance. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the parties agree as follows:

 Section 4. Annual Bonus. The Percent of Base Salary is revised for obtaining 100% of Target Performance as shown: 

From: 
  

							
	 Company
 Performance
	  	 Percent of
Base Salary
	  	 Individual
 Performance
	  	 Percent of
Base Salary

	 100% of Target
	  	33.33%	  	Target	  	16.67%

 To: 
  

							
	 Company
 Performance
	  	 Percent of
Base Salary
	  	 Individual
 Performance
	  	 Percent of
Base Salary

	 100% of Target
	  	43.5%	  	Target	  	21.5%

  

 1 








 Except as otherwise noted in this Amendment Number 1, all other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement remain
as originally written. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms of this Amendment Number 1 and the terms of the Employment Agreement, the terms of this Amendment Number 1 shall be controlling. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. 
  

									
	FOUNDATION COAL CORPORATION	 		 	FRANK J. WOOD
					
	  	 	/S/ MICHAEL R. PEELISH	 		 	  	 	/S/ FRANK J. WOOD
	 By:
 Title:
	 	 Michael R. Peelish
 SVP Safety and Human
Resources
	 		 		 	

  

 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF GENZYME DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, L.P. FOR THE SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             235
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   281
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     281
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              452
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       (171)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       281
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    92
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    46
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     48
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 48
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        48
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
§ 1.735-1 Character of gain or loss on disposition of distributed property. ( a ) *Sale or exchange of distributed property* — ( 1 ) *Unrealized receivables.* Any gain realized or loss sustained by a partner on a sale or exchange or other disposition of unrealized receivables (as defined in paragraph (c)(1) of § 1.751-1) received by him in a distribution from a partnership shall be considered gain or loss from the sale or exchange of property other than a capital asset.
( 2 ) *Inventory items.* Any gain realized or loss sustained by a partner on a sale or exchange of inventory items (as defined in section 751(d)(2)) received in a distribution from a partnership shall be considered gain or loss from the sale or exchange of property other than a capital asset if such inventory items are sold or exchanged within 5 years from the date of the distribution by the partnership. The character of any gain or loss from a sale or exchange by the distributee partner of such inventory items after 5 years from the date of distribution shall be determined as of the date of such sale or exchange by reference to the character of the assets in his hands at that date (inventory items, capital assets, property used in a trade or business, etc.).
( b ) *Holding period for distributed property.* A partner's holding period for property distributed to him by a partnership shall include the period such property was held by the partnership. The provisions of this paragraph do not apply for the purpose of determining the 5-year period described in section 735(a)(2) and paragraph (a)(2) of this section. If the property has been contributed to the partnership by a partner, then the period that the property was held by such partner shall also be included. See section 1223(2). For a partnership's holding period for contributed property, see § 1.723-1.
( c ) *Effective date.* Section 735(a) applies to any property distributed by a partnership to a partner after March 9, 1954. See section 771(b)(2) and paragraph (b)(2) of § 1.771-1. However, see section 771(c).
[T.D. 6500, 25 FR 11814, Nov. 26, 1960, as amended by T.D. 6832, 30 FR 8574, July 7, 1965]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Encorium Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David Ginsberg, M.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                  
|/s/ David Ginsberg, D.O.                                          
|David Ginsberg, D.O.                                              
|President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)

May 21, 2009

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or
as a separate disclosure document.
§ 1.9005-1 Election relating to the determination of gross income from the property for taxable years beginning prior to 1961 in the case of clay and quartzite used in making refractory products. ( a ) *In general.* Section 2 of the Act of September 26, 1961 (Pub. L. 87-321, 75 Stat. 683), provides that certain taxpayers may elect to apply the provisions of such section to all taxable years beginning before January 1, 1961, with respect to which the election is effective. Section 2 of the Act prescribes special rules for the application of section 613(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (and corresponding provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939) in the case of quartzite and clay used by the mine owner or operator in the production of refractory products.
( b ) *Election.* The election to apply the provisions of section 2 of the Act may be made only in the case of quartzite and clay used in the production of products generally recognized as refractory products by the refractories industry. Examples of such products are clay firebrick, silica brick, and refractory bonding mortars. The election may be made only by a taxpayer who both mined the clay or quartzite and used it in the production of refractory products. The election must be made in accordance with § 1.9005-4 on or before February 14, 1962, and the election shall become irrevocable on that date.
( c ) *Years to which the election is applicable.* If the election described in paragraph (b) of this section is made by the taxpayer, the provisions of section 2 of the Act shall be effective on and after January 1, 1951, for all taxable years beginning before January 1, 1961, in respect of which the: ( 1 ) Assessment of a deficiency,
( 2 ) Refund or credit of an overpayment, or
( 3 ) Commencement of a suit for recovery of a refund under section 7405 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954,
was not prevented on September 26, 1961, by the operation of any law or rule of law. The election is also effective on and after January 1, 1951, for any taxable year beginning before January 1, 1961, in respect of which an assessment of a deficiency has been made but not collected on or before September 26, 1961. (Sec. 2(f), 76 Stat. 683, 26 U.S.C. 613 note)
[T.D. 6583, 26 FR 12078, Dec. 16, 1961]
Order entered November 9 , 2012 

In The 

Court of Zppeato 

If iftb Rtititritt of Texao at 313affass 

No. 05-11-01641-CR 

No. 05-11-01642-CR 

CHIUNG-YAU LEE, Appellant 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court 

Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause Nos. 429-81558-09, 429-81559-09 

ORDER 

The Court REINSTATES the appeals. 

On October 8, 2012, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why 

appellant's brief had not been filed. On November 6, 2012, we received appellant's brief, 

together with extension motions. Therefore, we VACATE the October 8, 2012 order. 

We GRANT the November 6, 2012 extension motions and ORDER appellant's brief 

filed as of the date of this order. 

L 

DAVID L. BRIDGES 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Encorium Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30 , 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Philip L. Calamia, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Philip L. CalamiaPhilip L. CalamiaInterim Chief Financial Officer(Principal Accounting Officer)





August 16, 2010





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### § 3.9 Consolidated returns. [Reserved]