alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(logo) LNR

Partners, LLC

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

OF

 

LNR PARTNERS, LLC

 

 

The undersigned, Job Warshaw, being the President of LNR Partners, LLC (the "Special Servicer"), as special servicer under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the transactions listed on Schedule I hereto, hereby certifies, subject to any limitations listed on Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, on behalf of the Special Servicer, solely in his capacity as an authorized officer of the Special Servicer and not in his individual capacity, as follows:

 

1. A review of the activities performed by the Special Servicer during the period commencing on January 1, 2015 and ending on December 31, 2015 (or any other shorter period set forth on Schedule I hereto) (the “Reporting Period”), and of the Special Servicer's performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review and using the applicable servicing criteria under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

LNR PARTNERS, LLC,

a Florida limited liability company

 

By: /s/ Job Warshaw

Job Warshaw 

President

 

Dated: February 23, 2016

 

1601 Washington Avenue ∙ Suite 700 ∙ Miami Beach, Florida 33139-3164

Telephone: (305) 695-5600 ∙ Fax: (305) 695-5601

 

 

Schedule I

 

MSBAM 2015-C26

Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2015-C26, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C26

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. 

1221 Avenue of the Americas

New York NY 10020

James Y. Lee

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. 

1585 Broadway

New York NY 10036 

Stephen Holmes

 

Park Bridge Lender Services LLC 

Att: MSBAM 2015-C26

560 Lexington Avenue, 17th Floor 

New York NY 10022

Group

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 

9062 Old Annapolis Road 

Columbia MD 21045 

Group Notices

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 

9062 Old Annapolis Road 

MAC: R1204-010

Columbia MD 21045

Irene Kaplanis

 

Wilmington Trust, National Association 

1100 North Market Street

Wilimington DE 19890 

Dorri Costello

 

Wilmington Trust, National Association 

1100 North Market Street

Wilmington DE 19890 

Group
Order entered July 2 5 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 01415
- CR
TAMARA LAVON CHRISTI AN, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Collin County, Texas Trial Cour t Cause No. 005
- 80320
- 2013



### O RDER
The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether appel lant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8( b ). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the
trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.

– Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. This ap peal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
exv10w1



 





Exhibit 10.1




Hythiam, Inc.

Director Compensation Structure

Effective Date — July 1, 2007




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Board of	 	Audit	 	Compensation	 	Nomination and
	 	 	Directors	 	Committee	 	Committee	 	Governance Committee
	Annual Retainer, Chair
	 	$	0	 	 	$	10,000	 	 	$	2,500	 	 	$	2,500	 
	Annual Retainer, Independent Member
	 	$	15,000	 	 	 	N/A	 	 	 	N/A	 	 	 	N/A	 
	Annual Retainer, Officer Member
	 	$	0	 	 	 	N/A	 	 	 	N/A	 	 	 	N/A	 
	Board Meeting Fee, Independent
Member*
	 	$	2,500	 	 	 	N/A	 	 	 	N/A	 	 	 	N/A	 
	Committee Meeting Fee
	 	 	N/A	 	 	$	1,500	 	 	$	1,500	 	 	$	1,500	 







	*	 	In excess of four (4) Board meetings per year, excluding telephonic meetings
|                                                |
|------------------------------------------------|
|                                                |  |
| Subsidiaries                                   | State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization |
| Hortican Inc.                                  | Canada |
| Peace Naturals Project Inc.                    | Canada |
| Cronos Global Holdings Inc.                    | Canada |
| Cronos Canada Holdings Inc.                    | Canada |
| Original BC Ltd.                               | Canada |
| Cronos Malta Holdings Limited                  | Malta |
| Cronos Device Labs Ltd.                        | Israel |
| Cronos Israel G.S. Store Ltd.                  | Israel |
| Cronos Israel G.S. Cultivation Ltd.            | Israel |
| Cronos Israel G.S. Pharmacy Ltd.               | Israel |
| Cronos Israel G.S. Manufacturing Ltd.          | Israel |
| Cronos Group Celtic Holdings Ltd.              | Ireland |
| Cronos Group USA Holdings Company Limited      | British Columbia |
| Cronos USA Holdings Inc.                       | Delaware, USA |
| Cronos USA Client Services LLC                 | Delaware, USA |
| Zeus Cannabinoids LLC                          | Delaware, USA |
| Redwood Wellness, LLC                          | Delaware, USA |
| Redwood IP Holding, LLC                        | Delaware, USA |
| Redwood Retail, LLC                            | California, USA |
| Redwood Operations CA, LLC                     | California, USA |
| Thanos Holdings Ltd. d/b/a Cronos Fermentation | British Columbia |
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Encorium Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David Ginsberg, M.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ David Ginsberg                                                 
|David Ginsberg, M.D.                                               
|President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer)

November 25, 2008

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or
as a separate disclosure document.



E-3
EX-10.11.3



 





EXHIBIT
10.11.3




Amendment to the

Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors




     This document (this “Amendment”) is an amendment to the Deferred Compensation Plan for
Non-Employee Directors (the “Plan”) of Ferro Corporation (the “Company”) that was adopted effective
January 1, 1995 and amended July 1, 2001.



Background





	A.	 	On January 1, 2005, Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code became effective to impose new
requirements on deferred compensation, including the requirement that the form of payment be
fixed at the time income is deferred, and the requirement that any later election to change
that form of payment be subject to restrictions which include a 12-month notice period and a
5-year postponement of the payment commencement date (the “Election Restrictions”).






	B.	 	Deferrals made under the Plan on and after January 1, 2005 and their related earnings (the
“Post-2004 Deferrals”) are paid in the form of a single lump sum unless the participant elects
at the time of the deferral to instead receive payment in substantially equal monthly,
semi-annual or annual installments over a period not in excess of ten (10) years.






	C.	 	The Plan is permitted to provide a “transition election” in 2006 by which the participants
can elect, on or before December 31, 2006, to change the designated form of payment of their
Post 2004 Deferrals without being subject to the Election Restrictions.
	 
	D.	 	The Company desires to provide the Plan participants with such a transition election.







	E.	 	Article IV of the Plan permits the Company to amend the Plan, provided that the amendment
does not adversely affect the rights of participants;





Amendment




     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, pursuant to the provisions of Article IV of
the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended effective December 13, 2006, as follows:



     1. A new paragraph (c) is added at the end of Section 2.3 as it pertains to Post-2004
Deferrals to read as follows:




     “(c) Special Transition Election in 2006. Pursuant to the relief
granted in IRS Notice 2005-1, Q&A-19(c) and as described in the Proposed Treasury
Regulations under Code Section 409A, a Participant shall be permitted to make a new
election in 2006 regarding the form of distribution of the Participant’s Account,
provided that such election is made in writing and filed with the Corporation no later
than December 31, 2006. Such election shall be immediately effective; provided,
however, that such election shall not operate to change the form of distribution of
amounts that otherwise would be payable in 2006, nor will it operate to make payable
in 2006 amounts that would not otherwise be payable in that year.”



 









 





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed as of the
20th day of December, 2006.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Ferro Corporation

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ James F. Kirsch
 	 
	 	 	James F. Kirsch 	 
	 	 	Chairman, President &


Chief Executive Officer 	 



 - 2 -
Order entered September 22 , 202 2

In t he 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 21 - 00353 - CR No. 05 - 21 - 00354 - CR No. 05 - 21 - 00355 - CR ARIK NYLES MAXEY , Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEX A S, Appellee On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F17 - 75257 - M, F17 - 52204 - M, & F17 - 75276 - M O RDER Before the C ourt is appellant’s September 19, 2022 pro se letter asking this Court to reconsider t he J une 23, 2022 opinion in this case

. This Court denied app ellant ’ s July 18, 2022 motion for rehearing on July 29, 2022. We construe appellant’s September 19, 2022 pro se letter as a further motion for rehearing. See Rodriguez v. State , 446 S.W.3d 520, 525 ( T ex. App.

— San Antonio 2 01 4 , no pet.) (construing “ motion to correct” as motion for rehearing)

.A fter a motion for rehearing is decided, a further motion for rehearing may be filed only if this court (1) modifies its judgment, (2) vacates its judgment and

r enders a new judgment, or (3) issues a different opinion. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 49.5. Because we did not take any of th o se actions, appellant is not permitted to file a further motion for rehearing. W e DISMISS appellant’s September 19, 2022 motion

. /s/ CO R Y L. CARLYLE JUSTICE
#### § 20.2031-4 Valuation of notes.

The fair market value of notes, secured or unsecured, is presumed to be the amount of unpaid principal, plus interest accrued to the date of death, unless the executor establishes that the value is lower or that the notes are worthless. However, items of interest shall be separately stated on the estate tax return. If not returned at face value, plus accrued interest, satisfactory evidence must be submitted that the note is worth less than the unpaid amount (because of the interest rate, date of maturity, or other cause), or that the note is uncollectible, either in whole or in part (by reason of the insolvency of the party or parties liable, or for other cause), and that any property pledged or mortgaged as security is insufficient to satisfy the obligation.
Opinion issued March 18, 2021

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 20 - 00618 - CV

——————————— YPD TRUCKING CORPORATION, YORJAN PEREZ, AND POLAR FREIGHT, INC. , Appella nt s

V. FAIZA BISMILLA BADARPURA , Appell e e

On Appeal from the 400th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 19 - DCV - 266920 - A

MEMORANDU M OPINION Appellant s YPD Trucking Corporation, Yorjan Perez, and Polar Freight, Inc., have failed to timely file a brief. See T EX . R. A PP . P . 38.6(a) (governing time to file brief), 38.8(a) (governing failure of appellant to file brief). After being notified on October 21, 2020 that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant s did not2

respond. See T EX . R. A PP . P . 42.3(b) (allowing involunt ary dismissal of case). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to timely file a brief. We dismiss any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Landau, and Hightower.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,690,434
<SECURITIES>                                16,868,039
<RECEIVABLES>                                  325,592
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    737,006
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            20,019,390
<PP&E>                                      10,195,462
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,472,701
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              26,347,857
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,366,463
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    82,773,866
<OTHER-SE>                                  57,797,614<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                26,347,857
<SALES>                                         29,554
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               672,677
<CGS>                                           11,765
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,599,952
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,927,275)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,927,275)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,927,275)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               13,290,058
<FN>
<F1>This represents deficit accumulated during development stage.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 157

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for an adjournment or recess of the two

Houses.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 157

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legisla3 tive day of Friday, March 29, 1996, it stand adjourned

4 until 12:30 p.m. on Monday, April 15, 1996, or until noon

5 on the second day after Members are notified to reassem6 ble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution,

7 whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses

8 or adjourns at the close of business on Friday, March 29,

9 1996, Saturday, March 30, 1996, or Sunday, March 31,

10 1996, pursuant to a motion made by the Majority Leader

11 or his designee in accordance with this resolution, it stand

12 recessed or adjourned until noon on Monday, April 15,

13 1996, or until such time on that day as may be specified

14 by the Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to

15 recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second day after

16 Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section

17 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.

18 SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority

19 Leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with
2

•HCON 157 EH

1 the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority Lead2 er of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House

3 and Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in their

4 opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Passed the House of Representatives March 29,

1996.

Attest:

Clerk.
Opinion issued June 27, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-24-00059-CV

———————————

MICHAEL DONALD LEE SANDERS, Appellant

V.

ARTEMIS INVESTMENT HOLDINGS, LLC, DARIN J. RAY, AND 

DUCKWORTH & RAY, LLP, Appellees

On Appeal from 12th District Court

Grimes County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 035864

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Michael Donald Lee Sanders failed to file a brief. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 38.6(a), 38.8(a).1 On April 2, 2024, the Clerk of this Court notified Appellant that 

1 On January 29, 2024, Appellant had filed a Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice, 

representing that “the parties have entered into a settlement agreement that 
2

his appellate brief was past due, and his appeal was subject to dismissal. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f). We directed Appellant to file his brief and a 

motion requesting an extension to file the brief within 10 days of our notice. 

Appellant did not respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). 

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to file a brief. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f). We deny any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Hightower, Rivas-Molloy, and Farris.

dismisse[d] all claims with prejudice to the rights of either party.” We denied the 

Motion to Dismiss without prejudice on procedural grounds.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED September 8, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40416 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus
RENE CASTILLO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:05-CR-804

-------------------- Before KING, GARWOOD, and JOLLY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Rene Castillo raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Slaughter , 238 F.3d 580, 582-84 (5th Cir. 2000), which held that Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), did not render 21 U.S.C. § 841 unconstitutional on its face. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
§ 1.9000-4 Form and content of statement. ( a ) *Information to be shown.* The statement shall be filed on Form 2175 which may be obtained from district directors. It shall be filed with the district director for the internal revenue district in which the return was filed. The statement shall be prepared in accordance with the instructions contained thereon and shall show the following information: ( 1 ) The name and address of the taxpayer,
( 2 ) The amounts of each type of income deferred under section 452,
( 3 ) The amount of the addition to each reserve deducted under section 462,
( 4 ) The taxable income and the tax liability of the taxpayer computed with the application of sections 452 and 462,
( 5 ) The taxable income and the tax liability of the taxpayer computed without the application of sections 452 and 462,
( 6 ) The details of the recomputation of taxable income and tax liability, including any changes in other items of income, deductions, and credits resulting from the repeal of sections 452 and 462, and
( 7 ) If self-employment tax is increased, the computations and information required on page 3 of Schedule C, Form 1040.
( b ) *Procedure for recomputing tax liability.* In determining the taxable income and the tax liability computed without the application of sections 452 and 462, such items as vacation pay and prepaid subscription income shall be reported under the law and regulations applicable to the taxable year as if such sections had not been enacted. The tax liability for the year shall be recomputed by restoring to taxable income the amount of income deferred under section 452 and the amount of the deduction taken under section 462. Other deductions or credits affected by such changes in taxable income shall be adjusted. For example, if the deduction for contributions allowed for the taxable year was limited under section 170(b), the amount of such deduction shall be recomputed, giving effect to the increase in adjusted gross income or taxable income, as the case may be, by reason of the adjustments required by the repeal of sections 452 and 462.
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.7515-1 Special statistical studies and compilations on request.

The Commissioner is authorized within his discretion, upon written request of any person and payment by such person of the cost of the work to be performed, to make special statistical studies and compilations involving data from returns, declarations, statements, or other documents required by the Code or regulations or from records established or maintained in connection with the administration and enforcement of the Code; to engage in any such special study or compilation jointly with the party or parties requesting it; and to furnish transcripts of any such study or compilation. The requests for services should be addressed to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Attention: PR, Washington, D.C. 20224. The requests should describe fully the nature of the study or compilation desired, giving detailed specifications for all tables to be prepared, and should include a general statement regarding the use to be made of the data requested.