alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 145 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 145

To authorize testimony by employees of the Senate in The People of the 
               State of California versus Roger Calderon.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 20 (legislative day, September 7), 1993

Ms. Mikulski for Mr. Mitchell (for himself and Mr. Dole) submitted the 
        following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To authorize testimony by employees of the Senate in The People of the 
               State of California versus Roger Calderon.

Whereas, in the case of The People of the State of California versus Roger 
        Calderon, No. 1457661, pending in the Municipal Court for the City and 
        County of San Francisco, California, the District Attorney has requested 
        testimony from Claudette Josephson, an employee of the Senate on the 
        staff of Senator Barbara Boxer;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and Rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate can, by administrative or judicial process, be 
        taken from such control or possession but by permission of the Senate; 
        and
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate is needed for the promotion of justice, the Senate will take 
        such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the 
        privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That Claudette Josephson and any other employee of the 
Senate from whom testimony may be necessary are authorized to testify 
in The People of the State of California versus Roger Calderon or 
related proceedings, except concerning matters for which a privilege 
should be asserted.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of Owl Rock Capital Corporation II (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to the undersigned’s knowledge:

 

1) the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2) the information contained in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|                     |        |        |                         |
|---------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------|
| Date: March 4, 2022 |   | By:    | /s/ Craig W. Packer     |
|                |   |   | Craig W. Packer         |
|                |   |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
NATIONAL WOMEN’S BUSINESS COUNCIL

WHO

WE ARE

The National Women’s Business Council (NWBC) is a non-partisan federal advisory council created to serve as an 

independent source of advice and counsel to the President, Congress, and the U.S. Small Business Administration 

on economic issues of importance to women business owners. The Council’s mission includes conducting and 

supporting research on these issues in order to promote bold initiatives, policies and programs designed to support 

women’s business enterprises at all stages of development in the public and private sector marketplace. The Council 

is the government’s only independent voice for women entrepreneurs. Members are prominent women business 

owners and leaders of women’s business organizations.

WHAT

WE DO

The Council is committed to:

• Conducting research on issues important to women business owners and their organizations.

• Communicating these findings widely.

• Providing a platform for change to expand and improve opportunities for women business owners and their 

 enterprises.

HISTORY The NWBC was established as part of the Women’s Business Ownership Act of 1988, which, among other things, 

eliminated the requirement in many states for women to have a male relative co-sign any business loan. In 1994, 

the Small Business Reorganization Act changed the Council’s structure to its current form to include both women 

business owners and representatives of women’s business organizations.

PRESIDENTIALLY

APPOINTED CHAIR

1

BUSINESS OWNERS/CEO’S

8

BUSINESS 

REPRESENTATIVES

6

MEMBERS

15 

YEAR

TERMS

3

MEMBER INDUSTRY

MARKETING

FINANCE

ENGINEERING

STRATEGY

IT

MANUFACTURING/

CONSUMER GOODS

MEMBER GEOGRAPHY

SPORTS/

ENTERTAINMENT
#### §§ 1.45Y-1-1.45Y-2 [Reserved]
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.6622-1 Interest compounded daily.

(a) *General rule.* Effective for interest accruing after December 31, 1982, in computing the amount of any interest required to be paid under the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 or sections 1961(c)(1) or 2411 of title 28, United States Code, by the Commissioner or by the taxpayer, or in computing any other amount determined by reference to such amount of interest, or by reference to the interest rate established under section 6621, such interest or such other amount shall be compounded daily by dividing such rate of interest by 365 (366 in a leap year) and compounding such daily interest rate each day.

(b) *Exception.* Paragraph (a) of this section shall not apply for purposes of determining the amount of any addition to tax under sections 6654 or 6655 (relating to failure to pay estimated income tax).

(c) *Applicability to unpaid amounts on December 31, 1982* —

(1) *In general.* The unpaid interest (or other amount) that shall be compounded daily includes the interest (or other amount) accrued but unpaid on December 31, 1982.

(2) *Illustration.* The provisions of this (c) may be illustrated by the following example.

# Example.

Individual A files a tax return for calendar year 1981 on April 15, 1982, showing a tax due of $10,000. A pays $10,000 on December 31, 1982, but A does not pay any interest with respect to this underpayment until March 1, 1983, on which date A paid all amounts of interest with respect to the $10,000 underpayment of tax. On December 31, 1982, A's unsatisfied interest liability was $1,424.66 ($10,000 × 20 percent × 260/365 days). Interest, compounded daily, accrues on this unsatisfied interest obligation beginning on January 1, 1983, until March 1, 1983, the date the total interest obligation is satisfied. On March 1, 1983, the total interest obligation is $1,462.62, computed as follows:

| Item | Amount |
| --- | --- |
| Unpaid tax at December 31, 1982 | 0 |
| Unpaid interest at December 31, 1982 | $1,424.66 |
| Total unsatisfied obligation at December 31, 1982 | 1,424.66 |
| Interest from December 31, 1982, to March 1, 1983, at 16 percent per year compounded daily | 37.96 |
| Total due, March 1, 1983 | 1,462.62 |

[T.D. 7907, 48 FR 38231, Aug. 23, 1983]
"ERARTMENTOF 

. V\NSPORW[ON 

V- Nu. OPERATIONS jyj^li^ J) Kuykendall, Mayor 

CITYOFPRESCOT T Wimn^in-^ SteveBlair,Cou.ciln.an 

^^OJ&IHM'JhuHiveiiHon/ John Hanna, Councilman 

Jim Lamerson, Councilman 

Tammy Linn, Councilwoman 

Lora Lopas, Councilwoman 

Mary Ann Suttles, Councilwoman 

January 26, 2011 

Mr. Dennis DeVany 

Chief, EAS & Domestic Analysis 

US Department of Transportation 

400 Seventh Street, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

(via email to Dennis.DeVany@dot.gov) 

Dear Mr. DeVany: 

RE: Essential Air Service to Prescott, AZ (Docket DOT-OST-1996-1899), 

This letter is to express the City of Prescott support for the air service proposed by Great Lakes Airlines to 

provide service to Denver, Colorado and Ontario, California or Los Angeles International Airport as 

specified in their written proposal. We would request that Great Lakes Airlines work closely with the City in 

regards to developing a reeisonable flight schedule to ensure that service is provided at the highest level 

possible. 

The City of Prescott wishes to thank you for your continued support of the Essential Air Service Program at 

the Prescott Municipal Airport. The air service provided through the Essential Air Service Program is a vital 

component to our community and we look forward to future expanded airline service opportunities to 

markets which benefit the majority of the traveling public. 

If you should have any questions, please feel fi-ee to contact my office. 

Sincerely, 

Marlin Kuykendall 

Mayor
Editorial Note on Part 301
Editorial Note: In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations. References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

§ 301.6233-1 Extension to entities filing partnership returns. ( a ) *Entities filing a partnership return.* Except as provided in paragraph (c)(1) of this section, the provisions of subchapter C of chapter 63 of the Internal Revenue Code (subchapter C) and the regulations thereunder shall apply with respect to any taxable year of an entity for which such entity files a partnership return as well as to such entity's items for that taxable year and to any person holding an interest in such entity at any time during that taxable year. Any final partnership administrative adjustment or judicial determination resulting from a proceeding under subchapter C with respect to such taxable year may include a determination that the entity is not a partnership for such taxable year as well as determinations with respect to all items of the entity that would be partnership items, as defined in section 6231(a)(3) and the regulations thereunder, if such entity had been a partnership in such taxable year (including, for example, any amounts taxable to an entity determined to be an association taxable as a corporation). For example, a final determination under subchapter C that an entity that filed a partnership return is an association taxable as a corporation will serve as a basis for a computational adjustment reflecting the disallowance of any loss or credit claimed by a purported partner with respect to that entity.
( b ) *Partnership return filed but no entity found to exist.* Paragraph (a) of this section shall apply where a partnership return is filed for a taxable year but it is determined that there is no entity for such taxable year. For purposes of applying paragraph (a) of this section, the partnership return shall be treated as if it were filed by an entity. However, any final partnership administrative adjustment or judicial determination resulting from a proceeding under subchapter C with respect to such taxable year may also include a determination that there is no entity for such taxable year.
( c ) *Exceptions.* Paragraph (a) of this section shall not apply to— ( 1 ) Entities for any taxable year in which such entity would be excepted from the provisions of subchapter C of the Internal Revenue Code under section 6231(a)(1)(B) and the regulations thereunder (relating to the exception for small partnerships) if such entity were a partnership for such taxable year; and
( 2 ) Entities for any taxable year for which a partnership return was filed for the sole purpose of making the election described in section 761(a).
( d ) *Effective dates.* This section is applicable to partnership taxable years beginning on or after October 4, 2001. For years beginning prior to October 4, 2001, see § 301.6233-1T contained in 26 CFR part 1, revised April 1, 2001.
[T.D. 8965, 66 FR 50563, Oct. 4, 2001]
(logo) pwc

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

 

To the Board of Directors andshareholders of CoreLogic, Inc.:

 

We have examinedmanagement’s assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessmentof Compliance, that CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc. (the"Company"), a subsidiary of CoreLogic, Inc. complied with theservicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and ExchangeCommission's Regulation AB for all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcingcustomers for which the Company served as the commercial tax service provider(the "Platform"), as of December 31, 2016 and for the year thenended, only including 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(2)(v),1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and1122(d)(4)(xiii), which the Company has determined are applicable to theservicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Managementis responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Ourresponsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on ourexamination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicableservicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considerednecessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selectedservicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether theCompany performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicableservicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected servicingactivities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errorsthat may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may haveaffected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company duringthe period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides areasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legaldetermination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementionedapplicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016for all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which theCompany served as the commercial tax service provider is fairly stated, in allmaterial respects.

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers

 

February 6, 2017

 

 

*PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 1800, Dallas TX 75201-2997*

*T: 214-746-6500, F:214-712-6660,*www.pwc.com
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 .
  1.
    
    the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the
periods presented in the Form 10-Q.
 Date:  May 14, 2009
    /s/ J. Marcus ScrudderJ. MARCUS SCRUDDERChief Executive Officer
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE :

SHANNON MARK DOUTHIT
,
Relator. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 2 4

- 00008

- C R

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

OPINION

Relator Shannon Mark Douthit , a pro se inmate, filed a petition for writ of mandamus
asking this Court to compel the Honorable Roy Ferguson, District Judge of the 394th Judicial

District Court to rule on his motion for post

- conviction DNA testing pursuant to Article 64 of the

Code of Criminal Procedure. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. a rt. 64.03. For the reasons below, we
deny the petition as moot

. Douthit filed his motion for DNA testing on August 29, 2023

. He called the motion to the

trial court’s attention on December 6, 2023
, when he filed a request for a hearing on the motion.

He filed this mandamus on January 22, 2024.
On April 17, 2024, the district clerk filed a supplemental clerk’s record that includes an
order of the trial court dated January 23, 2024. The order takes action on Douthit’s motion byordering the State to deliver the evidence at issue to the trial court, file a response, and appoint

counsel for Douthit. The trial court’s ruli ng on Douthit’s pending motion renders moot his petition
for mandamus seeking the same

. See In re Bonilla
, 424 S.W.3d 528, 534 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014)
(orig. proceeding) ( concluding that mandamus relief is rendered moot when relator received the

relief requested by other means). Therefore, w e d eny the petition as moot.

JEFF ALLEY
, Chief Justice
April 22, 2024

Before Alley , C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 .
  1.
    
    the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the
periods presented in the Form 10-Q.
 Date: November 8, 2006
    
    /s/ James R. RidingsJames R. RidingsChairman of the Board andChief Executive Officer
#### § 25.2522(c)-4 Disallowance of double deduction in the case of qualified terminable interest property.

No deduction is allowed under section 2522 for the transfer of an interest in property if a deduction is taken from the *total amount of gifts* with respect to that property by reason of section 2523(f). See § 25.2523(h)-1.

[T.D. 8522, 59 FR 9658, Mar. 1, 1994]
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | Commercial Mortgage Servicing

D1086-120, 12th Floor

550 South Tryon Street

Charlotte, NC 28202

1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Trust and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 10, 2015, by and among GS MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORPORATION II, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Servicer, AEGON USA REALTY ADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-590M (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.7 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from November 10, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.                                                                                                         (logo) Together we’ll go far
Editorial Note on Part 880
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 880 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 880.6710 Medical ultraviolet water purifier. ( a ) *Identification.* A medical ultraviolet water purifier is a device intended for medical purposes that is used to destroy bacteria in water by exposure to ultraviolet radiation.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in part 807, subpart E, of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 880.9.
[45 FR 69682, Oct. 21, 1980, as amended at 83 FR 25915, June 5, 2018]
§ 300.8 Renewal of enrollment of enrolled actuary fee. ( a ) *Applicability.* This section applies to the renewal of enrollment of enrolled actuaries with the Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries pursuant to 20 CFR Part 901.
( b ) *Fee.* The fee for renewal of enrollment as an enrolled actuary with the Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries is $680.00.
( c ) *Person liable for the fee.* The person liable for the renewal of enrollment fee is the person renewing their enrollment as an enrolled actuary with the Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries.
( d ) *Applicability date.* This section is applicable beginning November 20, 2023.
[T.D. 9370, 72 FR 72607, Dec. 21, 2007, as amended by T.D. 9503, 75 FR 60321, Sept. 30, 2010; T.D. 9982, 88 FR 72370, Oct. 20, 2023]
#### FINANCIAL SECURITY LIFE ASSURANCE CO. *v.*Birtie L. POWELL

5-5059

447 S. W. 2d 64

Opinion delivered November 10, 1969

[Rehearing denied December 8, 1969.]

*Pope, Pratt, Shamburger, Buffalo &*Ross; By: *Pat Moran,*for appellant.

*Wendell Utley, W. D. McKay*and *Larry W. Chandler,*for appellee.

Conley Byrd, Justice.

The above styled appeal is affirmed for noncompliance with Supreme Court Rule 9 (d), appellant having failed to abstract the complaint, answer, decree and doctor’s report upon which it relies.

Affirmed.
###### Editorial Note on Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

In the text of this part, integral section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; decimal section references are to the Code of Federal Regulations.

References in the text to the “Code” are references to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

#### § 301.6021-1 Listing by district directors of taxable objects owned by nonresidents of internal revenue districts.

Whenever there are in any internal revenue district any articles subject to tax, which are not owned or possessed by or under the care or control of any person within such district, and of which no list has been transmitted to the district director, as required by law or by regulations prescribed pursuant to law, the district director, or other authorized internal revenue officer or employee, shall enter the premises where such articles are situated, shall make such inspection of the articles as may be necessary, and shall make lists of the same according to the forms prescribed. Such lists, being subscribed by the district director or other authorized internal revenue officer or employee, shall be sufficient lists of such articles for all purposes.

information returns

Information Concerning Persons Subject to Special Provisions