alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 75

Expressing the sense of the Congress that Social Security should be

maintained and protected.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 14, 1995

Mr. RANGEL submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Ways and Means

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that Social Security

should be maintained and protected.

Whereas, on August 14, 1935, the 74th Congress enacted the

first Social Security Act;

Whereas President Franklin Roosevelt stated, ‘‘In pursuing

this policy we are walking toward the ultimate objective

of making it possible for Americans to live as Americans

should.’’;

Whereas Social Security blends together elements of economic

wisdom and of social justice;

Whereas Social Security is a self-financed program supported

by deductions from workers’ earnings and matched by

employers;
2

•HCON 75 IH

Whereas over 141 million persons pay into the Social Security system;

Whereas over 42 million persons receive Social Security benefits;

Whereas persons earn Social Security benefits because they

and their employers pay payroll taxes;

Whereas Social Security is the Nation’s most successful antipoverty program, saving 15 million persons from poverty;

Whereas Social Security is the only pension program for 5

out of 10 persons;

Whereas more than 60 percent of older beneficiaries rely on

Social Security for at least half their income;

Whereas 1 out of 4 older beneficiaries rely on Social Security

for at least 90 percent of their income;

Whereas the Social Security system currently has over $436

billion in reserves and that amount will increase in fiscal

year 1995 by an additional $65 billion;

Whereas the American public has rejected cutting Social Security to pay for tax cuts or to meet short-term budget

targets;

Whereas reforms of Social Security benefits should be made

only to strengthen the long-term integrity and solvency of

the Social Security Trust Fund;

Whereas Social Security provides both young and older persons with economic protection in the event of a disability

or the loss of a parent or spouse; and

Whereas Social Security is the centerpiece of the sacred contract between citizens of the United States and their government, the cornerstone of the Nation’s commitment to

the financial well being of all its citizens as they age or
3

•HCON 75 IH

become disabled and the primary insurance for Americans against an uncertain economic future: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that So3 cial Security should be maintained and that reforms

4 should be made not to pay for tax cuts or meet short5 term budget targets, but only to strengthen and preserve

6 the long-term integrity of this program that has provided

7 economic security for tens of millions of Americans in

8 their senior years.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.1

# CERTIFICATION OF
PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS

Solely for the purposes of complying
with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, William D. Gehl, Chairman of the
Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer, and Thomas M. Rettler, Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer, of Gehl Company, certify, based on our knowledge, that:

| | (1) | the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three- and six-month periods ended           July
2, 2005 (the Quarterly Report) to which this statement is an
          exhibit fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | information
contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material           respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Gehl Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated:  August 10, 2005

| | /s/ William D. Gehl  
| | ---------------------
| | William D. Gehl      
| | /s/ Thomas M. Rettler
| | Thomas M. Rettler
Exhibit 35.5



|     |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                                                                        
|---- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  |  |  |  |  | Corporate Trust Services 
MAC R1204-010 9062 Old
Annapolis Road Columbia, MD 21045 
Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380

Citibank, National Association

388 Greenwich Street

14th Floor

New York, New York 10013



|Re: | Annual Statement of Compliance for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C30
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2015 (the Agreement), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator (Wells Fargo), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the Reporting Period):

(a)    A review of Wells Fargos activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has
been made under such officers supervision; and

(b)    To the best of such officers knowledge, based on
such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

March 1,
2017



|              
|--------------
|LOGO          
|BRIAN SMITH   
|Vice President



|                      |  |  |  |     
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A |  |  |  | LOGO
#### Kevin L. CHOICE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Danny R. BLACKWELL, Physician II, Kershaw Correctional Institution, in his individual capacity; Doris Ann Cook, Nurse Administrator, KCI, in her individual capacity; Michelle M. Ussery, R.N., KCI, in her individual capacity, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-6604.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 13, 2002.

Decided June 19, 2002.

Kevin L. Choice, Appellant Pro Se. John Eric Fulda, Irmo, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Kevin L. Choice appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Choice v. Blackwell,*No. CA-01-1931-0-25BD (D.S.C. Mar. 29, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

L.C., the mother

, Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES

and GUARDIAN AD LITEM, Appellee s

.

No s . 4D 19

- 1864, 4D 19

- 3760, 4D 19

- 3761 and 4D 19

- 3763

[ March 12, 2020 ]

Consolidated a ppeal s from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Robert B. Meadows , Judge; L.T. Case No.

562016DP 81, 562016DP246, and 562018DP108

.

Ryan Thomas Truskosk i of Ryan Thomas Truskoski, P.A., Orlando, for appella nt.

Andrew Feigenbaum of Children's Legal Services, West Palm Beach, for appellee Department of Children and Families

.

Thomasina F. Moore, Statewide Director of Appeals of Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, and Morgan Lyle Weinstein of Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, Defending Best Interest Project Weinstein Law, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee Guardian ad Litem

.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

L EVINE
, C.J., C IKLIN and G ERBER
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Southern Indiana Power Company *v.*Meadows et al.

[No. 22,677.

Filed December 8, 1914.]

From Lawrence Circuit Court; *Oren O. SwaAls,*Judge.

Action by the Southern Indiana Power Company against James Meadows and others. From a judgment for defendants, the plaintiff appeals.

*Appeal dismissed.*

*BrooJcs & Broohs,*for appellant.

*Boruff & Boruff*and *John E. Edwards,*for appellee.

Cox, J.

This is one of a series of condemnation proceedings brought by appellant in aid of its hydro-electric power plant. The proceeding is in all respects identical with that involved in *Southern Ind. Power Co.*v. *Cook*(1914), *ante*505, 107 N. E. 12, and the same questions are involved in the appeal. On the authority of the decision in that ease the appeal herein is dismissed.
exv10w35w4



 





Exhibit 10.35.4



Appendix 4
 
 



BUSINESS OBJECTS SA

Mr. John SCHWARZ

157-159 rue Anatole France



92300 Levallois-Perret



Levallois-Perret, February 23rd,

2007




AMENDMENT LETTER



Dear Sir,



We make reference to the credit agreement (hereafter
called “the credit agreement”) between BUSINESS OBJECTS
SA, having its registered office at 157 – 159 rue Anatole
France, 92300 Levallois-Perret, with its sole
identification number 379 821 994 RCS Nanterre and SOCIETE
GENERALE SA, having its registered office at 29 boulevard
Haussmann, 75009 Paris, with its sole identification
number 552 120 222 RCS Paris, made in Levallois-Perret on
March 01st, 2006 for an amount of 100.000.000
EUR (one hundred million euros).



As commonly agreed between BUSINESS OBJECTS SA and SOCIETE
GENERALE S.A., we hereby temporarily extend the maturity
date of the credit facility from February 28th, 2007 to
May 31st, 2007.



All other terms and conditions of the credit agreement remain unchanged.



This amendment letter is submitted to French law and to
the jurisdiction of the courts in Paris.



We kindly ask you to acknowledge the temporary
extension as proposed.



Yours sincerely,




	 	 	 
	/s/ Pascal Bernard-Mettil	 	/s/ John Schwarz
	 
	 	 
	For SOCIETE GENERALE SA

Mr. Pascal Bernard-Mettil

Director

Societe Generale

La Defense Entreprises

	 	For BUSINESS OBJECTS SA

Mr. John SCHWARZ

CEO of BUSINESS OBJECTS




 

In 2 Copies
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Biopure Corporation for the quarter ended July 31, 2008, I, Zafiris G. Zafirelis, Principal Financial
Officer, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. the Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2008 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Biopure Corporation.



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ Zafiris G. Zafirelis   
|Zafiris G. Zafirelis       
|Principal Financial Officer

September 15, 2008
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 181

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress that the Secflooding. the United States, such as prolonged drought or by disaster conditions existing in certain areas of ability to maintain livestock is adversely affected relieve the distress of livestock producers whose maintained under the Agricultural Act of 1970 to maining commodities in the disaster reserve retary of Agriculture should dispose of all re-
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 181

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That, in light of the prolonged drought and

3 other adverse weather conditions existing in certain areas

4 of the United States, the Secretary of Agriculture should

5 promptly dispose of all commodities in the disaster reserve
2

•HCON 181 EH

1 maintained under section 813 of the Agricultural Act of

2 1970 (7 U.S.C. 1427a) to relieve the distress of livestock

3 producers whose ability to maintain livestock is adversely

4 affected by the disaster conditions, such as prolonged

5 drought or flooding.

Passed the House of Representatives June 4, 1996.

Attest:

Clerk.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mackenzie Investment Management
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Beverly Yanowitch, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.

|                                                                                | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ BEVERLY YANOWITCHBeverly Yanowitch
Chief Financial Officer
November 7, 2002
#### Dudley BRADBERRY *v.*Frank GOWER et al

5-5084

447 S. W. 2d 124

Opinion delivered November 24, 1969

*Camp*& *Lingle,*for appellant.

*Quy Brinkley,*for appellees.

Conley Byrd, Justice.

In this unlawful detainer action, appellant Dudley Bradberry admits that he has been in possession of lands belonging to appellees Frank Gower, Tommy Thompson, Virginia Thompson, Bill Foster and M.ary Foster as a tenant from year to year and that he was served with proper six months notice to quit and vacaté the premises. Appellant’s defense in the trial court was that a new oral lease had been entered into between himself and Frank Gower after he was served with the termination notices. Appellant’s testimony was corroborated by his son and two long time employees relative to a conversation around a combine in a field. Appellee Gower denied that such a conversation took place. The jury found the facts contrary to appellant’s position.

For reversal, appellant asserts that the verdict was contrary to the law and the evidence. We find no merit in this contention. The jury is the sole judge of the credibility of witnesses and we must affirm when there is substantial evidence to support the jury’s finding.

Affirmed with directions to the Clerk of this Court to issue an immediate mandate..
1

**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTAN A** 

**Supreme Court Cause No. DA** 

**- 0549** 

) PETER B. HUTTON, )

Plaintiff and Appellant ) )
v. ) ) ) ESTATE OF JERALD L. NYHART, ) ORDER TO ALLOW by and through the Personal Representative , ) EXTENSION OF TIME SANDY NYHART; POINT OF ROCKS ) TO FILE APPELLANT’S ANGUS RANCH, INC.; SHERRY N. ) REPLY BRIEF SMITH, an individual )

Defendants and A

ppellees )

) ) WHEREAS, Appellant Peter B. Hutton has filed a Motion for Extension of Time to file his Reply Brief; an d to consolidate the two replies in one filing; WHEREAS, Appellees ’ Counsel have been contacted and have no Objection; NOW THEREFORE, upon good cause , the time for filing Appellant’s Opening Brief is extended 1 0 days up to May 23, 2022 and Appellant may consolidate his Reply Briefs in one filing.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 28 2022

04/28/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0549
39392.

#### STROTHER v. KENNEDY, Executor.

Bell, Judge.

Movant brought the present action against the executor of the will of John U. Strother as a motion in the, nature of an application authorized by the Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act of 1940 to set. aside a previous verdict and decree in an action brought by the executor to determine, who were the heirs at law, legatees and distributees entitled to participate in the division of the estate of the deceased. While the movant alleged facts sufficient otherwise to warrant *382the granting of the motion to set aside the verdict and decree as to him only, the Act of Congress requires as a condition of opening the judgment that it be made to appear that the movant has a meritorious or legal defense to the action or some part thereof. 50 U.S.C.A. App. Sec. 520 (4).

Decided July 17, 1962

Rehearing denied July 26, 1962.

*Gumming, Nixon, Eve, Waller ■& Gapers, John D. Capers,*for plaintiff in error.

*Killebrew, McGahee & Plunkett, Paul K. Plunkett,*contra.

As an attempt to assert a meritorious defense, the movant alleged in his response to a separate action brought by the executor for the construction of the will of the deceased that he (movant) was the son of the deceased by virtue of a contract for his adoption entered into between his mother and the deceased and his wife. The Supreme Court of Georgia has interpreted these allegations as insufficient to set forth a valid contract for adoption. *Strother v. Kennedy,*218 Ga. 180. Since the Supreme Court has held that the allegations of the contract of adoption relied upon to make the movant a child of the deceased by virtual adoption were insufficient, the movant’s only asserted meritorious defense to the present-action is refuted. Therefore, there does not exist one of the essential grounds required by the Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act to authorize the setting aside and reopening of the judgment as to movant. The trial court properly denied the prayers of the movant’s petition.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Felton, C. J., and Hall, J., concur.*
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

,

Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 19, 2018 

# Order

Clerk Octo ber 1 9 , 2018

15 5276 ( 97 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appell ee

, SC: 15 5276

v COA: 328532

Wayne CC: 14

- 007466

- FC

DIALLO CORLEY

,

Defendant

- Appell ant

.

____________________________________ __/

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of defendant

- appell ant to adjourn the case

from the November 2018 oral argument session of the Court is GRANTED.
# SHELBY COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT

MARK H. LUTTRELL, JR. jANET L. SHIPMAN, J.D. HELEN MORROW, M.D., M.P.A. 

### PublicHealth MAYOR INTERIM DIRECTOR HEALTH OFFICER
CERTIFIED MAIL# 7002 2030 0003 5399 2931 November 5, 2015
Heather McTeerToney, Regional Administrator EPA Region4 61 Forsyth Street SW Atlanta, GA 30303
Dear Ms. Toney, Prll'VI!nt. Promote.**Pr.:~t.,ct.**

In accordance with the requirements of40 CFR 51.102, this serves as notice ofthe scheduling of a public hearing to receive comments on proposed amendments to the state implementation plan. Copies ofthe proposed SIP amendment are available for public inspection at the SCHD office during normal business hours and an electronic copy of the proposal along with all technical support docwnents can be found at the following ftp site: ht!ps://xfer.shelbvcountvtn.gov/ The usemame and password are both 'public'. A public hearing regarding this matter has been scheduled at the SCHD Auditorium at 814 Jefferson Avenue Memphis, TN onDecember 15,2015 at 5:30pm. Please feel free to contact me ifyou have any question regarding this matter. Respectfully,

# 1?~/2?~ Robert Rogers, P.E., Manager Pollution Control

Mission 

### Topromote,protectandimprove the health andenvironmentof allShelby County residents. 814 Jefferson Avenue 

### + Memphis, Tennessee 38105 (901) 222·9000
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

In the interest of J.A.F.

, a child, * From the 318 th District

Court of Midland County,

Trial Court No. FM 54,284

.

No. 11

- 15

- 00034

- CV * July 2, 2015

* Per Curiam Me morandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the appeal

should be dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the

appeal is dismissed.
Exhibit 21.1

 

SUBSIDIARIES OF OWL ROCK CAPITAL CORPORATION II

 

|                           |              |
|---------------------------|--------------|
| Name                      | Jurisdiction |
|                      |         |
| OR LENDING II LLC         | DELAWARE     |
|                      |         |
| ORCC II FINANCING LLC     | DELAWARE     |
|                      |         |
| ORCC II FINANCING II LLC  | DELAWARE     |
|                      |         |
| OR DH II LLC              | DELAWARE     |
|                      |         |
| OR MH II LLC              | DELAWARE     |
|                      |         |
| OR HH II LLC              | DELAWARE     |
|                      |         |
| OR HEH II LLC             | DELAWARE     |
|                      |         |
| OR Long Island MH II LLC  | DELAWARE     |
|                      |         |
| OR Garden State MH II LLC | DELAWARE     |
|                      |         |
| OR Toronto MH II LLC      | DELAWARE     |
|                      |         |
| OR Midwest MH II LLC      | DELAWARE     |
|                      |         |
| OR Jemico MH II LLC       | DELAWARE     |
|                      |         |
| OR Atlanta MH II LLC      | DELAWARE     |
|                      |         |
| OR PCF II LLC             | DELAWARE     |
|                      |         |
| OR GH II LLC              | DELAWARE     |
|                      |         |
| OR AH II LLC              | DELAWARE     |
|                      |         |
| ORCC II BC 2 LLC          | DELAWARE     |
|                      |         |
| ORCC II BC 3 LLC          | DELAWARE     |
|                      |         |
| ORCC II BC 4 LLC          | DELAWARE     |
|                      |         |
| ORCC II BC 5 LLC          | DELAWARE     |

 

 

 

----