alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 18.1379-1 Transitional rules on enactment. ( a ) *Prior elections.* Any election that was made under section 1372(a) (as in effect before the enactment of the Subchapter S Revision Act of 1982), and that is still in effect as of the first day of a taxable year beginning in 1983, shall be treated as being an election made under section 1362(a). In addition, any election that was made under section 1371(g)(2) (as in effect before the enactment of that Act), and that is still in effect as of the first day of a taxable year beginning in 1983, shall be treated as being an election made under section 1362(d)(2).
( b ) *Prior terminations.* For purposes of section 1362(g), any termination under section 1372(e) (as in effect before the enactment of the Subchapter S Revision Act of 1982) shall not be taken into account.
( c ) *Time and manner of making an election under section 6(c)(3)(B) of the Subchapter S Revision Act of 1982.* In the case of a qualified oil corporation (as defined in section 6(c)(3)(B) of the Subchapter S Revision Act of 1982), the corporation may elect under that section of the Act to have the amendments made by the Act not apply and to have Subchapter S (as in effect on July 1, 1982), Chapter I of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 apply. The election shall be made by the corporation by filing a statement that— ( 1 ) Contains the name, address, and taxpayer identification number of the corporation and of each shareholder,
( 2 ) Identifies the election as an election under section 6(c)(3)(B) of the Subchapter S Revision Act of 1982, and
( 3 ) Provides all information necessary in the judgment of the district director to show that the corporation meets the requirements (other than the requirement of making this election) of a qualified oil corporation.
The statement shall be signed by any person authorized to sign the return required to be filed under section 6037 and by each person who is or was a shareholder in the corporation at any time during the taxable year beginning in 1983 and shall be filed with the return for that taxable year.
R9E

23
t 26
1 &
Ss
7
35
¥
y
rey
Sl
S|
[*}
PB PB39 V
I
I
HE HES|
Cooper Spur ESTA Veo -— 1 153 1-1
5 Ski Area ma sa |
3 ZF -
a id & AF yy a <
9 10
+ T
; 2
g s
PBA
A8i
H 9 o/d /"
\ I
BaP SSSI t
. A \ i)
WW idd ern S79)!
om
ROE
Legend

VA) Crystal Springs Watershed 650
Special Resources
Management Unit

Forest Service Administered Land
Road Number ___
US Forest Service

630 Forest Service

T_—1 Crystal Springs Zone of Trail Number Private or Other
Contribution -
Highway
(MO Existing USFS Wilderness
Area Road
---— Trail
Stream

Mo6-02-07

0.8 1Mile

1Kilometer

Mount Hood
National
Forest

OREGON

Crystal Springs Watershed Special Resources Management
Unit, June 2006

This product was compiled from various S
sources and may be corrected, updated,
modified, or replaced at any time.
#### § 1.46-10 [Reserved]
#### § 15.0-1 Scope of regulations in this part.

The regulations in this part relate to expenditures of the type described in section 615(a) or in section 617(a)(1) paid or incurred after September 12, 1966. The regulations in this part do not apply to the income tax treatment of mining exploration expenditures paid or incurred before September 13, 1966, and no election made pursuant to the provisions of the regulations in this part shall have any effect on the income tax treatment of exploration expenditures paid or incurred before such date. See § 15.1-4 for rules relating to treatment of exploration expenditures paid or incurred during taxable years beginning before September 13, 1966, and ending after September 12, 1966.
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 147 (Monday, August 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 38475]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18437]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50-391; ASLBP No. 09-893-01-OL-BD01]

Establishment of Atomic Safety and Licensing Board; Tennessee 
Valley Authority

    Pursuant to delegation by the Commission dated December 29, 1972, 
published in the Federal Register, 37 FR 28,710 (1972), and the 
Commission's regulations, see 10 CFR 2.104, 2.300, 2.313, 2.318, and 
2.321, notice is hereby given that an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 
(Board) is being established to preside over the following proceeding: 
Tennessee Valley Authority (Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2)
    This proceeding concerns a request for hearing from petitioners 
Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, Tennessee Environmental Council, We 
the People, the Sierra Club, and the Blue Ridge Environmental Defense 
League. The hearing request was submitted in response to a May 1, 2009 
Notice of Receipt of Update to Application for Facility Operating 
License and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing for the Watts Bar Nuclear 
Plant, Unit 2 (74 FR 20350). Petitioners challenge the updated 
application filed by Tennessee Valley Authority for a facility 
operating license for the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2, to be 
located in Rhea County, Tennessee.
    The Board is comprised of the following administrative judges:

Lawrence G. McDade, Chair, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, 
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
Paul B. Abramson, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. Nuclear 
Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
Gary S. Arnold, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. Nuclear 
Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.

    All correspondence, documents, and other materials shall be filed 
in accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule, which the NRC promulgated in 
August 2007 (72 FR 49139).

    Issued at Rockville, Maryland, this 28th day of July 2009.
E. Roy Hawkens,
Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel.
[FR Doc. E9-18437 Filed 7-31-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
```
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alpha Energy, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Karen Ziegler, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: November 23, 2015   /s/ Karen Ziegler Karen Ziegler Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 

** Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137, 150 (1995).

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-50973

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GARY DWAYNE ALLBRIGHT,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-97-CA-123

(SA-94-CR-58-1)

- - - - - - - - - -

April 23, 1999

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Gary Dwayne Allbright, federal inmate #63846-080, appeals

the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. He argues that his 18

U.S.C. § 924(c) conviction should be vacated because the jury

received an erroneous pre-Bailey** instruction on “using” and

therefore, the jury could have convicted him for mere possession

of firearms. We have carefully reviewed the arguments and the

appellate record. For essentially the same reasons as given by
the district court, see United States v. Allbright, No. SA-97-CA123 (W.D. Tex. Oct. 28, 1997), we conclude that Allbright is not

entitled to relief on the jury-instruction claim. See United

States v. Brown, 161 F.3d 256, 259 (5th Cir. 1998) (en banc);

United States v. Hall, 110 F.3d 1155, 1162 (5th Cir. 1997);

United States v. Shaid, 937 F.2d 228, 232 (5th Cir. 1991) (en

banc).

AFFIRMED.
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 99

To express the sorrow of the Senate upon the death of George Speaker

Mickelson, Governor of the State of South Dakota, and other South

Dakota leaders.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 20 (legislative day, APRIL 19), 1993

Mr. PRESSLER (for himself and Mr. DASCHLE) submitted the following

resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To express the sorrow of the Senate upon the death of

George Speaker Mickelson, Governor of the State of

South Dakota, and other South Dakota leaders.

Whereas Governor Mickelson had a long and distinguished

career, having been born in Mobridge, South Dakota in

1941, earning a law degree from the University of South

Dakota in 1965 and serving a tour of duty with the

United States Army in Vietnam;

Whereas he was first elected to the South Dakota State

House of Representatives in 1974, where he served six

years and served as House Speaker in 1979–80;

Whereas he was elected Governor of South Dakota in 1986

and was reelected in 1990, during which time he was

dedicated to numerous initiatives, including economic de-
2

SRES 99 ATS

velopment, education and health care, and served as cochairman of a National Governors’ Association task force

on health care and as chairman of the Western Governors’ Association; and

Whereas Governor Mickelson and South Dakota State business leaders Roland Dolly, Ron Reed, Angus Anson,

Dave Birkeland, Roger Hainje, and pilots Ron Becker

and David Hansen were killed in a plane crash while returning to South Dakota from a meeting to help advance

economic development in the State: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate has heard with deep sorrow

2 and profound regret of the death of Governor Mickelson

3 and expresses its sympathy to his wife, Linda, his daugh4 ter, Amy, and his sons, Mark and David; and be it further

5 Resolved, That the Senate has heard with deep sorrow

6 and profound regret of the deaths of Roland Dolly, Ron

7 Reed, Angus Anson, Dave Birkeland, Roger Hainje, Ron

8 Becker, and David Hansen and expresses its sympathy to

9 the families of these leading South Dakotans.

Æ
### In The Matter Of: 

## SERVED: May 4, 2016
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC

DocketNo. FAA-2014-0552 Air Medical Resources Group, Inc. ) ) ·) ) ) 

### Case No. 2014NM070012 Respondent

DISMISSAL 

### ORDER
On May 3, 2016, the Respondent filed a Notice ofWithdrawal ofRequest for Hearing, stating that the parties had reached a settlement in this matter. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.215, a party may withdraw a requestfor a hearing without the consent ofthe administrative lawjudge at any time before or during a hearing. Upon such withdrawal, the administrative lawjudge shall dismiss the case with prejudice. THEREFORE,IT IS ORDEREDthat these proceedings are dismissed with prejudice.

# ~LD - Administrative Law Judge

Attachment: Service List

### SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. 

### MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington,DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000 1

ONE COPY Gregory S. Winton, Respondent's Counsel The Aviation Law Firm 1997 Annapolis Exchange Parkway, Suite 300 Annapolis, MD 21401 TEL: 301-294-8550 F.Ax::866-568-9886
Adam Runkel, 

### Complainant's Counsel Federal Aviation Administration Office ofthe ChiefCounsel Enforcement Division-Western Division 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. Renton, WA 98056 TEL: 425-227-2914 F.Ax:: 425-227-1007 Email: adam.runkel@faa.gov

The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald,Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (El 1-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2014-0552 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
§ 1.245A-11 Applicability dates. ( a ) *In general.* Sections 1.245A-6 through 1.245A-11 apply to taxable years of a foreign corporation beginning on or after December 1, 2020 and to taxable years of section 245A shareholders in which or with which such taxable years end.
( b ) *Exception.* Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, a taxpayer may choose to apply §§ 1.245A-6 through 1.245A-11 for a taxable year of a foreign corporation beginning before December 1, 2020 and to a taxable year of a section 245A shareholder in which or with which such taxable year ends, provided that the taxpayer and all persons bearing a relationship to the taxpayer described in section 267(b) or 707(b) apply §§ 1.245A-6 through 1.245A-11, in their entirety, and § 1.6038-2(f)(18) for all such taxable years and any subsequent taxable years beginning before December 1, 2020.
[T.D. 9934, 85 FR 76963, Dec. 1, 2020]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,387,107
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          70,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             2,080,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  7,892,357
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     75,113,905
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,524,837
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              88,587,683
<DEPOSITS>                                  81,058,725
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            872,492
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,767,085
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,178,551
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              88,587,683
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              5,149,455
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              468,248
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             5,617,703
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,930,619
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,930,885
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,155,066
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  489,300
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 282
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,559,703
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,487,300
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,487,300
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   796,100
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .65
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.86
<LOANS-NON>                                    415,276
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                415,276
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,200,398
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  245,604
<RECOVERIES>                                    80,743
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,524,837
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,502,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         22,837
        

</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Great Western Land and Recreation, Inc. (the
Company) for the six months ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jay N. Torok, Principal Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. /s/ Jay N. TorokJay N. TorokChairman of the Board andPrincipal Executive OfficerMay 16, 2005
 This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge
standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose. This certification is not being filed
as part of this Report or as a separate disclosure document.
§ 25.7701-2 Definitions; spouse, husband and wife, husband, wife, marriage. ( a ) *In general.* For the definition of the terms spouse, husband and wife, husband, wife, and marriage, see § 301.7701-18 of this chapter.
( b ) *Applicability date.* The rules of this section apply to taxable years ending on or after September 2, 2016.
[T.D. 9785, 81 FR 60616, Sept. 2, 2016]
Western Global Airlines, LLC 5566 Broadcast Court Sarasota, FL 34620 941-313-4781 August 5, 2014 U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Operations West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 1200 NewJersey Avenue SE Washington, DC 20590 Subject: Request for Exemption to 14 CFR 121.434(3} (c) (1) 

### (ii)
Dear U.S. Department ofTransportation, _/:**-~** .. -.·.•.: - 

### - - i

Western Global Airlines, LLC ("WGA"}, holderofAir Carrier Certificate 9WGA495N, is requesting and exemption to 14 CFR 121.434(3} (c) (1) (ii), the requirementfor a Pilot in Command completing initial or upgrade training to be observed by a Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") Inspector during at least one flight leg which includes takeoffand landing, during the Operating Experience as specified by 14 CFR 121.434. WGA is requesting the FAAto permit WGA to substitute aqualified and authorized check airman in place ofa FAA inspectorto observe a qualifying pilot in command who is completing the initial or upgrade training specified in Section 121.424 during at least one flight leg that includes atakeoffand a landing. WGA's business is predominantly engaged in international flying. Requiring a FAA inspectorto conduct the observation would result in a substantial burden on both the FAA and WGA due tothe thirtyday lead time required for an FAA Inspectorto obtain foreign country clearance. WGA proposes three check airmen be designated this authority. Granting this exemption is in the public interest in that it allows the FAAto utilize Inspectorsfor more immediate needs and should also provide financial savings in avoiding FAA inspectortravel expense.

# $~~ ThoriasJ. Quehi Vice President, Operations Cc: William Royal, FAA POl, CMO 67
AS TO TIME FOR FILING MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL.

Circuit Court of Cuyahoga County.

#### A. W. Moskowitz v. Silas Auerbach.

Decided, June 10, 1901.

*New Trial*— Date *for'Filing Motion.*

The time within which a motion for a new trial may be filed, dates from the rendition of the verdict and not from the overruling of a motion for judgment upon special findings of the jury.

*Hile & Horner,*for plaintiff in error.

*Ilenclerson*<£' *Quail,*contra.

Caldwell, J.; TIale, J., and Marvin, J., concur.

This case is here on a petition in error to reverse a judgment of the court of common pleas. Special findings were submitted to the jury at the request of counsel, and answers -were returned to the special findings, and a general verdict. Thereupon counsel for plaintiff filed a motion for judgment on-the. special findr ings, notwithstanding the general verdict against him. The court overruled his motion and, in overruling the motion, delivered an opinion which has been presented to the court and which has been published in one of the legal journals .of. the state. The complaint made, is that the court erred in overruling that motion.

AA^e fully concur in the judgment of the court and in the opinion pronounced as printed and as presented to us.

The only other error complained of is that the court refused to permit the plaintiff .to file a motion for a new trial. The plaintiff had a motion filed in time, which he thereafter withdrew, and after his motion for judgment on the pleadings was disposed of, he applied to the court to file his motion for a new trial. The time prescribed by statute for filing a motion for a new trial had then long passed and the court for that reason refused leave to file it. It is claimed this was error, and that the time for filing a mol ion for a new trial does not apply where a *275motion for judgment on special findings is interposed; that where that is done, the motion for a new trial should not be filed until that motion is disposed of. We do not think this point is well taken. ■

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.
----

Order of the Court of First Instance of 16 October 2006 — Weghorst-Oliko v Commission

(Case T-314/99) (1)

(2006/C 310/62)

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Second Chamber Extended Composition has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

----

(1)OJ C 63, 4.3.2000.

----
# Den Europæiske Unions C 311A/19.

| | ISSN 1725-2393 |
| --- | --- |
| Den Europæiske Unions
  Tidende | C 311A |
| | |
| Dansk udgave | Meddelelser og oplysninger | 49. årgang19. december 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2393

Den Europæiske Unions

Tidende

C 311A

Dansk udgave

Meddelelser og oplysninger

49. årgang19. december 2006

---

| Informationsnummer | Indhold | Side |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Oplysninger |
| | Rådet |
| 2006/C 311A/1 | Ledig stilling som administrator — audiovisuel rådgiver — Ref. CONS/AD/046 | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Indhold

Side

III   Oplysninger

Rådet

2006/C 311A/1

Ledig stilling som administrator — audiovisuel rådgiver — Ref. CONS/AD/046

1

| DA | |
| --- | --- |

DA

---

III Oplysninger

Rådet

| 19.12.2006 | DA | Den Europæiske Unions Tidende | CA 311/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2006

DA

Den Europæiske Unions Tidende

CA 311/1

---

LEDIG STILLING SOM ADMINISTRATOR — AUDIOVISUEL RÅDGIVER

Ref. CONS/AD/046

(2006/C 311 A/01)

Generalsekretariatet for Rådet ønsker at besætte en ledig stilling i Enhed 1 »Pressetjenesten« i Generaldirektorat F (Presse — Kommunikation — Protokol).

Den udvalgte ansøger vil få tilbudt en kontrakt som midlertidigt ansat i kategori AD, lønklasse 10, for en periode på fire år (med en prøvetid på seks måneder), som kun kan forlænges én gang for en periode på højst to år.

Yderligere oplysninger om den ledige stilling og om ansøgningsbetingelserne kan fås på Rådets websted under ledige stillinger på adressen:

http://www.consilium.europa.eu/concours

Ansøgningsfristen er den 19. januar 2007, idet poststemplets dato er afgørende.

---