alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 3.5


                      CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF THE
                    RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF
                      SILICON STORAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC.

     The undersigned certify that:

     1.   They are the duly elected and acting President and Chief Executive
Officer, and Secretary, respectively, of Silicon Storage Technology, Inc., a
California corporation.

     2.   Article III, paragraph A of the Restated Articles of Incorporation
of this corporation is amended to read in full as follows:

     "The Corporation is authorized to issue two classes of stock to be
     designated, respectively, "Common Stock" and "Preferred Stock."  The
     total number of shares the Corporation shall have the authority to
     issue is 250,000,000 shares of Common Stock, without par value, and
     7,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, without par value."

     3.   The foregoing amendment of the Restated Articles of Incorporation
has been duly approved by the Board of Directors.

     4.   The foregoing amendment of the Restated Articles of Incorporation
has been duly approved by the required vote of shareholders in accordance
with Section 902 of the California Corporations Code.  The total number of
outstanding shares of the corporation is 29,569,081 shares of Common Stock.
The number of shares voting in favor of the amendment equaled or exceeded the
vote required.  The percentage vote required was more than 50% of the
outstanding shares of Common Stock.  No shares of Series A Junior
Participating Preferred Stock are currently outstanding.

     We further declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State
of California that the matters set forth in this certificate are true and
correct of our own knowledge.

Executed at Sunnyvale, California on June 30, 2000.


                                       /s/ Bing Yeh
                                       -------------------------------------
                                       Bing Yeh
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer


                                       /s/ Jeffrey L. Garon
                                       -------------------------------------
                                       Jeffrey L. Garon
                                       Secretary
EX-10.11B



 






Exhibit 10.11(b)




Schedule of Executives with

Continuity Agreements




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Title	 	Name	 	Years/Comp*
	Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer

	 	Stephen D. Newlin
	 	 	3	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Senior Vice President and General
Manager, Distribution

	 	Michael L. Rademacher
	 	 	3	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Senior Vice President , Chief Legal
Officer and Secretary

	 	Wendy C. Shiba
	 	 	3	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Senior Vice President and Chief
Information and Human Resources Officer

	 	Kenneth M. Smith
	 	 	3	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

	 	W. David Wilson
	 	 	3	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Senior Vice President, Commercial Development

	 	Michael E. Kahler
	 	 	3	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Senior Vice President and General Manager,
Vinyl Compounds

	 	Robert M. Rosenau
	 	 	3	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Senior Vice President and General
Manager, Colors and Engineered
Materials, Europe and
Asia

	 	Bernard P. Baert
	 	 	2	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Vice President and General Manager,
Producer Services

	 	Patrick F. Burke
	 	 	1	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Vice President and General Manager,
Specialty Resins

	 	Francois S. Cote
	 	 	1	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Vice President and General Manager, North
America Engineered Materials

	 	Craig M. Nikrant
	 	 	1	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Vice President and General Manager, North
America Color and Additive Masterbatches

	 	John V. Van Hulle
	 	 	1	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Vice President, Research and Innovation

	 	Cecil Chappelow
	 	 	1	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Vice President, Scientific Development

	 	Roger W. Avakian
	 	 	1	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Vice President, Investor Relations and
Communications

	 	Dennis A. Cocco
	 	 	1	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Vice President and General Manager,
Polymer Coating Systems

	 	Daniel L. Kickel
	 	 	1	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Treasurer

	 	John L. Rastetter
	 	 	1	 








 




			
	*	 	Years of compensation payable upon change of control.
#### § 1.672(b)-1 Nonadverse party.

A *nonadverse party* is any person who is not an adverse party.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of Owl Rock Capital Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to the undersigned’s knowledge: 

 

1) the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) as applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

2) the information contained in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| Date: February 27, 2019 |   | By:    | /s/ Alan Kirshenbaum                           |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                    |   |   | Alan Kirshenbaum                                    |
|                    |   |   | Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
H. Con. Res. 34 Agreed to April 4, 1995.

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the fourth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-five

Concurrent Resolution

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Ringling Bros. and Barnum

& Bailey Circus Anniversary Commemoration.

Whereas Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus celebrates its 125th year on April 10, 1995, during its engagement in our

Nation’s Capital;

Whereas Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus represents a 200-year tradition of circus in America; Whereas Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus demonstrates to children of all ages that humans and animals can work together

in harmony and cooperation; and Whereas Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus is committed to its goal of educating the people of the United States as to

the need to conserve endangered species: Now, therefore, be it Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concur- ring),

SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR RINGLING BROS. AND

BARNUM & BAILEY CIRCUS ANNIVERSARY COMMEMORATION.

Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus (hereinafter in this resolution referred to as ‘‘Ringling Bros.’’) shall be permitted

to sponsor a public event, with circus elephants and performers,

on the Capitol Grounds on April 3, 1995, or on such other date

as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President

pro tempore of the Senate may jointly designate.

SEC. 2. CONDITIONS.

The event to be carried out under this resolution shall be

free of admission charge to the public and arranged not to interfere

with the needs of Congress, under conditions to be prescribed by

the Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board; except

that Ringling Bros. shall assume full responsibility for all expenses

and liabilities incident to all activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.

For the purposes of this resolution, Ringling Bros. is authorized

to erect upon the Capitol grounds, subject to the approval of the

Architect of the Capitol, such stage, sound amplification devices,

and other related structures and equipment as may be required

for the event to be carried out under this resolution.

SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board

are authorized to make any such additional arrangements that

may be required to carry out the event under this resolution.
H. Con. Res.—342

SEC. 5. LIMITATION ON REPRESENTATIONS.

Ringling Bros. shall not represent, either directly or indirectly,

that this resolution or any activity carried out under this resolution

in any way constitutes approval or endorsement by the Federal

Government of Ringling Bros. or any product or service offered

by Ringling Bros.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A0866. ERNEST MORTON v. ANGELA MORTON. 

In March 2018, the trial court entered a judgment and final decree of divorce

in this case. Two months later, the trial court entered a “Thrift Savings Plan

Retirement Benefits Court Order,” awarding Angela Morton a portion of Ernest

Morton’s retirement benefits. Ernest thereafter filed a motion to set aside the court’s

order pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-60 (d). The trial court denied the motion, and Ernest

filed this appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction.

An appeal from an order denying a motion to set aside a judgment under

OCGA § 9-11-60 (d) must be made by application for discretionary review. See

OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (8); Jim Ellis Atlanta, Inc. v. Adamson, 283 Ga. App. 116, 116

(640 SE2d 688) (2006). Moreover, “[a]ppeals from judgments or orders in divorce,

alimony, and other domestic relations cases” must also be made by application for

discretionary appeal. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2). “[C]ompliance with the discretionary

appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Fabe v. Floyd, 199 Ga. App. 322, 332 (1) (405

SE2d 265) (1991). Ernest Morton’s failure to file a discretionary application thus

deprives this Court of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

December 17, 2018

12/17/2018
Exhibit 32

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers
of Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2016 (the Form 10-Q), of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                     |  |     |  |                                                                
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 3, 2016 |  |     |  |                                                                
|                     |  | By: |  | /s/ Jochen E. Tilk                                             
|                     |  |     |  | Jochen E. Tilk                                                 
|                     |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer                          
|Date: August 3, 2016 |  |     |  |                                                                
|                     |  | By: |  | /s/ Wayne R. Brownlee                                          
|                     |  |     |  | Wayne R. Brownlee                                              
|                     |  |     |  | Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K, Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being
filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 14

- 00521

- CV

MEDINA INTERESTS, LTD.

, Appellant

v.

William Paul TRIAL , et al., Appellees

From the 218th Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13

- 04

- 00098

- CVK Honorable Stella Saxon, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE MARTINEZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s Order Granting Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and the trial court’s Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Cross

Motion for Partial Summary Judgment are AFFIRMED.

It is ORDERED that appellees recover their costs of appeal from appellant.

SIGNED June 24, 2015.

_____________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
MATERIALS NOT INCLUDED IN

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (AD) DOCKET

FAA-2013-0573

Docket Number

2012-SW-042-AD

Directorate Identifier

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

Eurocopter Emergency Alert Service Bulletin No. 01.00.81, Revision 0, dated March 19, 

2012

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel,

Southwest Region

Rules Docket

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663

Fort Worth, Texas 76137

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays.
<PAGE>
 Exhibit 11


                     POTASH CORPORATION OF SASKATCHEWAN INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                     FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30

                   (Figures and amounts expressed in millions,
                    except per share and per option amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                 2001           2000
                                                                              ----------    ----------
<S>                                                                           <C>           <C>
A    Net income as reported, Canadian GAAP                                    $    116.7    $    178.1

B    Items adjusting net income                                               $    (17.6)   $     (1.6)

C    Net income, US GAAP                                                      $     99.1    $    176.5

D    Weighted average number of shares outstanding                            51,867,000    52,651,000

E    Net additional shares issuable for fully diluted earnings per               316,000       269,000
     share calculation

     CANADIAN GAAP

     Basic earnings per share (A/D)                                           $     2.25    $     3.38

     Fully diluted earnings per share ((A/(D+E)                               $     2.24    $     3.36

     UNITED STATES GAAP

     Basic earnings per share (C/D)                                           $     1.91    $     3.35

     Fully diluted earnings per share ((C/(D+E))                              $     1.90    $     3.32
</TABLE>
#### § 1.907(b)-1 Reduction of creditable FORI taxes (for taxable years beginning after December 31, 1982).

If the foreign law imposing a FORI tax (as defined in § 1.907(c)-3) is either structured in a manner, or operates in a manner, so that the amount of tax imposed on FORI is generally materially greater than the tax imposed by the foreign law on income that is neither FORI nor FOGEI (“described manner”), section 907(b) provides a special rule which limits the amount of FORI taxes paid or accrued by a person to a foreign country which will be considered income, war profits, or excess profits taxes. Section 907(b) will apply to a person regardless of whether that person is a dual capacity taxpayer as defined in § 1.901-2(a)(2)(ii)(A). (In general, a dual capacity taxpayer is a person who pays an amount to a foreign country part of which is attributable to an income tax and the remainder of which is a payment for a specific economic benefit derived from that country.) Foreign law imposing a tax on FORI will be considered either to be structured in or to operate in the described manner only if, under the facts and circumstances, there has been a shifting of tax by the foreign country from a tax on FOGEI to a tax on FORI.

[T.D. 8338, 56 FR 11066, Mar. 15, 1991]
```

[111th Congress Public Law 381]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 124 STAT. 4133]]

Public Law 111-381
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To authorize leases of up to 99 years for lands held in trust for Ohkay 
          Owingeh Pueblo. <<NOTE: Jan. 4, 2011 -  [S. 3903]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. OHKAY OWINGEH PUEBLO LEASING AUTHORITY.

    Subsection (a) of the first section of the Act of August 9, 1955 (25 
U.S.C. 415(a)), is amended in the second sentence by inserting ``and 
lands held in trust for Ohkay Owingeh Pueblo'' after ``of land on the 
Devils Lake Sioux Reservation,''.

    Approved January 4, 2011.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 3903:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

SENATE REPORTS: No. 111-371 (Comm. on Indian Affairs).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010):
            Dec. 21, considered and passed Senate.
            Dec. 22, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
§ 1.6032-1 Returns of banks with respect to common trust funds. ( a ) Every bank (as defined in section 581) maintaining a common trust fund shall make a return of income of the common trust fund, regardless of the amount of its taxable income. Member banks of an affiliated group that serve as co-trustees with respect to a common trust fund must act jointly in making a return for the fund. If a bank maintains more than one common trust fund, a separate return shall be made for each. No particular form is prescribed for making the return under this section, but Form 1065 may be used if it is designated by the bank as the return of a common trust fund. The return shall be made for the taxable year of the common trust fund and shall be filed on or before the date prescribed by section 6072(b) with the service center prescribed in the relevant Internal Revenue Service revenue procedure, publication, form, or instructions to the form (see § 601.601(d)(2) of this chapter). Such return shall state specifically with respect to the fund the items of gross income and the deductions allowed by subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code, shall include each participant's name and address, the participant's proportionate share of taxable income or net loss (exclusive of gains and losses from sales or exchanges of capital assets), the participant's proportionate share of gains and losses from sales or exchanges of capital assets, and the participant's share of items which enter into the determination of the tax imposed by section 56. See §§ 1.584-2 and 1.58-5. If the common trust fund is maintained by two or more banks that are members of the same affiliated group, the return must also identify the member bank in the group that has contributed each participant's property or money to the fund. A copy of the plan of the common trust fund must be filed with the return. If, however, a copy of such plan has once been filed with a return, it need not again be filed if the return contains a statement showing when and where it was filed. If the plan is amended in any way after such copy has been filed, a copy of the amendment must be filed with the return for the taxable year in which the amendment was made. For the signing of a return of a bank with respect to common trust funds, see § 1.6062-1, relating to the manner prescribed for the signing of a return of a corporation.
( b ) This section applies to returns filed on or after January 30, 2020. Section 1.6032-1T (as contained in 26 CFR part 1, revised April 2019) applies to taxable years beginning before January 30, 2020.
[T.D. 9892, 85 FR 5324, Jan. 30, 2020]
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 23, 2020

NO. 03-18-00674-CR

Ashlee Dunbar, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 424TH DISTRICT COURT OF LLANO COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND KELLY

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgments revoking community supervision entered by the trial court. 

Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no 

reversible error in the trial court’s judgments revoking community supervision. Therefore, the 

Court affirms the trial court’s judgments revoking community supervision. Because appellant is 

indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
#### § 1.989(b)-1 Definition of weighted average exchange rate.

For purposes of section 989(b)(3) and (4), the term “weighted average exchange rate” means the simple average of the daily exchange rates (determined by reference to a qualified source of exchange rates described in § 1.988-1(d)(1)), excluding weekends, holidays and any other nonbusiness days for the taxable year.

[T.D. 8263, 54 FR 38664, Sept. 20, 1989. Redesignated by T.D. 8367, 56 FR 48437, Sept. 25, 1991; 57 FR 6060, Feb. 18, 1992; T.D. 9452, 74 FR 27890, June 11, 2009]
Adams, Kevin (OSn

From:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:

Attachments:

Hi All,

Adams, Kevin (OSn

Tuesday, December 03, 2013 12:40 PM

Barbara Sloniker (bsloniker@siouxlandchamber.com); Sioux City, Airport Manager, Curt

Miller; Sioux City, Mayor, Mike Hobart

'Livsey, Will'; SkyWest, Brad Rawson

Request for Comment

AA, Proposal at SUX.pdf; UA, Proposal at SUX.pdf

Attached above are the two timely-filed proposals for Essential Air Service (EAS) at Sioux City, Iowa, submitted by

United and American in response to Order 2013-11-3. We are currently reviewing those proposals. The attached

proposals are directly from the carriers and will soon be reflected in the Docket, which you may access through

Regulations.gov at

DOT-OST-2011-0131, along with other pertinent information on this proceeding.

The next step in the carrier-selection process is for you to provide us with your community's comments, a critically

important element in our carrier-selection decision, especially the comments of civic officials. Accordingly, I ask that

everyone get back to us, preferably by email, no later than January 6, 2014. We will docket this email, as well as any

replies.

In brief, look at the proposals, and if you have any questions, call me, and get back to us by the deadline, January 6,

2014.

Best,

Kevin Adams

202-366-1047

1
#### Spiro C. Zingus et al. *v.*Redevelopment Agency of the City oe New London

*C. George*Kanabis, for the appellees (plaintiffs).

*C. Robert Satti,*for the appellant (defendant).

Argued January 7

decided January 7, 1969

The motion by the plaintiffs to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in New London County is denied.
#### § 25.2523(h)-1 Denial of double deduction.

The value of an interest in property may not be deducted for Federal gift tax purposes more than once with respect to the same donor. For example, assume that D, a donor, transferred a life estate in a farm to D's spouse, S, with a remainder to charity and that D elects to treat the property as qualified terminable interest property. The entire value of the property is deductible under section 2523(f). No part of the value of the property qualifies for a charitable deduction under section 2522 for gift tax purposes.

[T.D. 8522, 59 FR 9663, Mar. 1, 1994]